alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

R & D FILM 1, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

 Civil Action 2:12-cv-1120

v. Judge Michael H. Watson

 Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers

DOES 272-352,

Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

 Plaintiff filed its Complaint in this action on December 5, 2012. On July 12, 2013, the

Court ordered Plaintiff to amend its Complaint within thirty days to substitute in the real names

for its Doe Defendants and to perfect service on those named partes as required under Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or to alternatively show cause why the Court should not dismiss

this action pursuant to Rule 4(m). (ECF No. 6.) To date, Plaintiff has not moved to amend its

Complaint to substitute in the real names for its Doe Defendants. Nor has Plaintiff responded to

the Court’s Show Cause Order. Plaintiff did, however, file a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal

With Prejudice as to Doe 352. (ECF No. 7.) It is therefore RECOMMENDED that the Court

dismiss the remaining Doe Defendants without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to

timely effect service of process. 

PROCEDURE ON OBJECTIONS

If any party seeks review by the District Judge of this Report and Recommendation, that

party may, within fourteen (14) days, file and serve on all parties objections to the Report and

Case: 2:12-cv-01120-MHW-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 08/21/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Recommendation, specifically designating this Report and Recommendation, and the part in

question, as well as the basis for objection. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

Response to objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

The parties are specifically advised that the failure to object to the Report and

Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and

waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court. See, e.g., Pfahler v. Nat’l Latex

Prod. Co., 517 F.3d 816, 829 (6th Cir. 2007) (holding that “failure to object to the magistrate

judge’s recommendations constituted a waiver of [the defendant’s] ability to appeal the district

court’s ruling”); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005) (holding that

defendant waived appeal of district court’s denial of pretrial motion by failing to timely object to

magistrate judge’s report and recommendation). Even when timely objections are filed,

appellate review of issues not raised in those objections is waived. Robert v. Tesson, 507 F.3d

981, 994 (6th Cir. 2007) (“[A] general objection to a magistrate judge’s report, which fails to

specify the issues of contention, does not suffice to preserve an issue for appeal . . . .”) (citation

omitted)).

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: August 21, 2013 /s/ Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers 

 Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers

 United States Magistrate Judge 

2

Case: 2:12-cv-01120-MHW-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 08/21/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 45148.

#### Protests 525788-G, etc., of Louis L. Allen et al. (New York).

*499Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
AAM-11-389-E 

July 28, 2011 

 Exemption No. 9965A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0990 

Mr. Craig Devenport 

Director of Operations 

West Bend Air, Inc. 

P.O. Box 409 

West Bend, WI 53095 

Dear Mr. Devenport: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 9965. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions 

and limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated July 11, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of West Bend Air, Inc. (WB Air), for an extension of Exemption No. 9965. That 

exemption from part 120 Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows WB Air, which is 

operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees 

under one testing program. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to WB Air. 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9965 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 
 2

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of WB Air are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times 

while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the WB Air part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9965 to November 30, 2013 

unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9965 remain the same. This letter must be 

attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9965. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David A. Campbell, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of InfraREIT, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of InfraREIT, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 18, 2015 |  |  |  | /s/ David A. Campbell                
|                     |  |  |  | David A. Campbell                    
|                     |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        

The foregoing certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of InfraREIT, Inc. under Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language of such filing.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection withthis quarterly report of Torotel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending October 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, H. James Serrone,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

 

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ H. James Serrone    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
|                    |   |
| H. James Serrone        |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| December 14, 2009  |   |

#####  

----
Order entered January 16, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01410-CV

IN RE NUSRAT PERVEEN, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-06933

ORDER

Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Schenck

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs, if any, of this original proceeding.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE 

JUSTICE
THIS SENIOR NOTE IS AN OBLIGATION SOLELY OF THE BANK AND WILL NOT BE AN OBLIGATION OF, OR OTHERWISE GUARANTEED BY, UNION PLANTERS CORPORATION OR ANY OF ITS AFFILIATES OTHER THAN THE BANK. THIS SENIOR NOTE DOES NOT EVIDENCE DEPOSITS OF THE BANK AND IS NOT INSURED BY THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION OR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCY. THE OBLIGATIONS EVIDENCED BY THIS SENIOR NOTE RANK PARI PASSU WITH ALL OTHER SENIOR UNSECURED INDEBTEDNESS OF THE BANK, EXCEPT DEPOSIT LIABILITIES (AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 11(d)(11) OF THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE ACT) AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS THAT ARE ENTITLED TO ANY PRIORITIES OR PREFERENCES. IN A LIQUIDATION OR OTHER RESOLUTION OF THE BANK, THIS SENIOR NOTE WOULD BE TREATED DIFFERENTLY FROM, AND HOLDERS OF THIS SENIOR NOTE COULD RECEIVE, IF ANYTHING, SIGNIFICANTLY LESS THAN HOLDERS OF, DEPOSIT LIABILITIES OF THE BANK.

UNLESS THIS SENIOR NOTE IS PRESENTED BY AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY (55 WATER STREET, NEW YORK, NEW YORK) (THE "DEPOSITARY") TO THE BANK OR ITS AGENT FOR REGISTRATION OF TRANSFER, EXCHANGE OR PAYMENT, AND ANY SENIOR NOTE ISSUED UPON REGISTRATION OF TRANSFER OF, OR IN EXCHANGE FOR, OR IN LIEU OF, THIS SENIOR NOTE IS REGISTERED IN THE NAME OF CEDE & CO. OR SUCH OTHER NAME AS REQUESTED BY AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DEPOSITARY AND ANY PAYMENT HEREON IS MADE TO CEDE & CO., ANY TRANSFER, PLEDGE OR OTHER USE HEREOF FOR VALUE OR OTHERWISE BY OR TO ANY PERSON IS WRONGFUL, SINCE THE REGISTERED OWNER HEREOF, CEDE & CO., HAS AN INTEREST HEREIN.

THIS GLOBAL SECURITY MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED EXCEPT AS A WHOLE BY THE DEPOSITARY TO A NOMINEE OF THE DEPOSITARY OR BY THE DEPOSITARY OR ANY SUCH NOMINEE TO A SUCCESSOR DEPOSITARY OR A NOMINEE OF SUCH SUCCESSOR DEPOSITARY.

THIS SENIOR NOTE IS ISSUABLE ONLY IN FULLY REGISTERED FORM IN MINIMUM DENOMINATIONS OF $250,000 AND INTEGRAL MULTIPLES OF $1,000 IN EXCESS THEREOF. EACH OWNER OF A BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN THIS SENIOR NOTE MUST BE AN INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR WHO IS AN "ACCREDITED INVESTOR" WITHIN THE MEANING OF RULE 501(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND IS REQUIRED TO HOLD A BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN A $250,000 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OR ANY INTEGRAL MULTIPLE OF $1,000 IN EXCESS THEREOF OF THIS SENIOR NOTE AT ALL TIMES.

No. FXR-001
NUMBER 13-11-00211-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

ORLANDO LASCANO A/K/A ORLANDO LARSCANO, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 94th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza 

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Orlando Lascano a/k/a Orlando Larscano, attempts to appeal his 

conviction for driving while intoxicated. The trial court has certified that this Ais a 

plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.@ See TEX. R. APP. P. 

25.2(a)(2).
2

On April 12, 2011, this Court notified appellant=s counsel of the trial court=s 

certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether 

appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel=s findings 

as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the 

existence of any amended certification.

On July 7, 2011, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel=s response 

does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that 

appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be 

dismissed if the trial court=s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of 

appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this 

appeal is DISMISSED. Appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

28th day of July, 2011.
A90A0173.

#### BANKS v. THE STATE. RADFORD v. SUPERIOR COURT OF EMANUEL COUNTY.

A90A0009.

(394 SE2d 356)

Decided April 10, 1990

Rehearing denied May 14, 1990.

Jimmy Radford, *pro se.*

*Richard A. Malone, District Attorney, Samuel H. Altman, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee (case no. A90A0009).

Cooper, Judge.

These pro se appeals have been consolidated for review because they both involve the denial of indigent appellants’ requests for copies of their trial transcripts to be provided at the State’s expense. Neither appellant filed a direct appeal from his criminal conviction within the time specified by law.

1. “ ‘While an indigent is entitled to a copy of his trial transcript for a direct appeal of his conviction, such is not the case in collateral post-conviction proceedings.’ [Cit.] ‘After the time for appeal has expired there is no due process or equal protection right to a free copy of one’s court records absent a showing of necessity or justification. [Cits.]’ [Cit.]” *McDowell v. Balkcom,*246 Ga. 611 (272 SE2d 280) (1980). Accord *Bailey v. State,*259 Ga. 340 (2) (380 SE2d 264) (1989); *Montgomery v. Tremblay,*249 Ga. 483 (292 SE2d 64) (1982). Since neither appellant stated a specific reason which would necessitate or justify obtaining a free copy of his trial transcript, there was no error in the denial of their motions.

2. Appellant Radford’s additional objections are likewise without merit, as they are either supported by no binding authority or no authority at all. Furthermore, our review of the record shows that these enumerations do not constitute grounds for reversal.

*Judgments affirmed.*

*Banke, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.*

*613Joseph Banks, *pro se.*

*Robert E. Wilson, District Attorney, Robert M. Coker, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee (case no. A90A0173).
# Official Journal L 170/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 170 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5130 June 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 170

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5130 June 2008

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 of 27 June 2008 laying down detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 on the common organisation of the market in wine as regards support programmes, trade with third countries, production potential and on controls in the wine sector | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 of 27 June 2008 laying down detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 on the common organisation of the market in wine as regards support programmes, trade with third countries, production potential and on controls in the wine sector

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Case: 2:12-cv-01191-EAS-EPD Doc #: 51 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T15:03:03-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
No. 45146.

#### Protest 29309-K of A. Reasenberg & Son (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the case was called for trial the protest was submitted without the introduction of evidence in support of the claims made. On the record presented the protest was overruled.
Case: 2:13-cv-00002-EAS-EPD Doc #: 55 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T18:59:59-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Déle a los niños una sonrisa saludable-- use fluoruros

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Déle a los niños una sonrisa saludable-- use fluoruros 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  National Institute of Dental Research (U.S.) 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  National Institute of Dental Research (U.S.) 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Children receiving fluoride for dental health. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  150 × 37 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018688873.jpg; 018688873.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of NYFIX,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the  period  ending  June 30,  2003 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Mark R. Hahn,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:

    (1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

/s/ Mark R. Hahn
---------------------------
Mark R. Hahn
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2003

This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

REPUBLIC WATER COMPANY OF

TEXAS, LLC

,

Appellant

,

v

.

MIDDLE PECOS GROUNDWATER

CONSERVATION DISTRICT

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 7

- 00 001

- CV

Appeal from the

112 th District Court

of Pecos C ounty, Texas

(TC# P

- 11956

- 112

- CV )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is the Appellant’s motion to extend mediation. The motion is

DENIED, and the Court ORDERS this appeal to continue. The appellate timetable suspension is

lifted and the Reporter’s R ecord shall now be filed in this Court on or befo re March 31 , 201 7

.

Further, the Court has this day filed the Clerk’s Record (1 volume) which was received on February

23 , 201 7 for the above styled and numbered cause.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 1 st day of March , 201 7

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
Case: 2:12-cv-01194-EAS-EPD Doc #: 54 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T21:17:11-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO