alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 72 (Monday, April 16, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 18884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7155]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD01-07-032]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Reynolds Channel, Lawrence, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast Guard District, has issued a 
temporary deviation from the regulation governing the operation of the 
Atlantic Beach Bridge across Reynolds Channel, mile 0.4, at Lawrence, 
New York. Under this temporary deviation a one-hour advance notice will 
be required for bridge openings from April 9, 2007 through April 27, 
2007, between 7 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., daily. This deviation is necessary 
to facilitate scheduled bridge maintenance.

DATES: This deviation is effective from April 9, 2007 through April 27, 
2007.

ADDRESSES: Materials referred to in this document are available for 
inspection or copying at the First Coast Guard District, Bridge Branch 
Office, One South Street, New York, New York, 10004, between 7 a.m. and 
3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone 
number is (212) 668-7165. The First Coast Guard District Bridge Branch 
Office maintains the public docket for this temporary deviation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First 
Coast Guard District, at (212) 668-7165.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Atlantic Beach Bridge across Reynolds 
Channel, mile 0.4, at Lawrence, New York, has a vertical clearance in 
the closed position of 25 feet at mean high water and 30 feet at mean 
low water. The existing operating regulations are listed at 33 CFR 
117.799.
    The bridge owner, Nassau County Bridge Authority, requested a 
temporary deviation to allow the bridge owner to require a one-hour 
advance notice for bridge openings to facilitate scheduled mechanical 
bridge maintenance.
    Under this temporary deviation a one-hour advance notice shall be 
required for bridge openings at the Atlantic Beach Bridge from April 9, 
2007 through April 27, 2007, between 7 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., daily.
    Should the bridge maintenance authorized by this temporary 
deviation be completed before the end of the effective period published 
in this notice, the Coast Guard will rescind the remainder of this 
temporary deviation, and the bridge shall be returned to its normal 
operating schedule. Notice of the above action shall be provided to the 
public in the Local Notice to Mariners and the Federal Register, where 
practicable.
    This deviation from the operating regulations is authorized under 
33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: April 6, 2007.
Gary Kassof,
Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7-7155 Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
Case: 2:13-cv-00002-EAS-EPD Doc #: 54 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T18:59:59-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
# Official Journal C 434A/24 N

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 434A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5924 November 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 434A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5924 November 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2016/C 434 A/01 | Notice of Open Competition — EPSO/AD/330/16 — Administrators in the field of nuclear energy (AD 7) for the following profiles: 1. Nuclear Safeguards Inspectors 2. Policy Officers | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2016/C 434 A/01

Notice of Open Competition — EPSO/AD/330/16 — Administrators in the field of nuclear energy (AD 7) for the following profiles: 1. Nuclear Safeguards Inspectors 2. Policy Officers

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRADLEY RYAN GRIM,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 1 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of June, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 15



November 1, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated November 1, 2002 on our
reviews of interim financial information of UniSource Energy
Corporation (the Company) and Tucson Electric Power Company
(TEP) as of and for the period ended September 30, 2002 and
included in the Company's and TEP's quarterly report on Form 10-
Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in
the Company's Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-
99317, 333-43765, 333-43767, 333-43769, 333-53309, 333-53333
and 333-53337), on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-31043 and 333-93769), and
on Form S-4 (No. 333-60809) and in TEP's Amendment No. 3 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-65143).

Very truly yours,



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Thomas
Brandt, Executive Vice President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Trans-Lux
Corporation, do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

    (1) The Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

    This Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not
be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Registrant or
the certifying officer.



                                       /s/ Thomas Brandt
                                       -----------------------------
Date:  May 13, 2005                    Thomas Brandt
                                       Executive Vice President and
                                       Co-Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 76 (Friday, April 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19883-19884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7579]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 041107A]

Marine Mammals; File No. 1121-1900; Correction

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; receipt of application; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that NOAA Fisheries Office of Science 
and Technology (Principal Investigator: Dr. Brandon Southall), Silver 
Spring, MD, has applied in due form for a permit to conduct scientific 
research on marine mammals.

DATES: Written, telefaxed, or e-mail comments must be received on or 
before May 17, 2007.

ADDRESSES: The application and related documents are available for 
review upon written request or by appointment in the following 
office(s):
    Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 
20910; phone (301)713-2289; fax (301)427-2521; http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/review.htm; and
    Southeast Region, NMFS, 263 13th Avenue South, Saint Petersburg, FL 
33701; phone (727)824-5312; fax (727)824-5309.
    Written comments or requests for a public hearing on this 
application should be mailed to the Chief, Permits, Conservation and 
Education Division, F/PR1, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 
East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910. Those 
individuals requesting a hearing should set forth the specific reasons 
why a hearing on this particular request would be appropriate.
    Comments may also be submitted by facsimile at (301)427-2521, 
provided the facsimile is confirmed by hard copy submitted by mail and 
postmarked no later than the closing date of the comment period.
    Comments may also be submitted by e-mail. The mailbox address for 
providing e-mail comments is [email protected]. Include in the 
subject line of the e-mail comment the following document identifier: 
File No. 1121-1900.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tammy Adams or Jolie Harrison, 
(301)713-2289.

[[Page 19884]]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    On April 17, 2007, notice was published in the Federal Register (72 
FR 19181) that a request for a scientific research permit had been 
submitted by the above-named applicant. The file number for the 
application in the title and e-mail comment address is corrected in 
this document. All other information to the notice has been unchanged. 
Please refer to the April 17, 2007, notice for a summary of the 
application.

    Dated: April 17, 2007.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of 
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-7579 Filed 4-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6748 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHN ERIC HUGHES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief

District Judge. (CR-00-4; CA-05-278-3)

Submitted: September 29, 2005 Decided: October 7, 2005

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Eric Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Cornell Wallace,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

John Eric Hughes, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his motion to vacate

judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), which Hughes

attempted to bring under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. An appeal may not be taken from the district court’s

order unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district

court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find both that the district court’s assessment of his

constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Hughes has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal.

Additionally, we construe Hughes’ notice of appeal and

informal brief on appeal as an application to file a second or

successive § 2255 motion. See United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d
- 3 -

200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file

a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on

either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously

unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on

collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence sufficient to

establish that no reasonable fact finder would have found the

movant guilty. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3)(c), 2255 (2000). Hughes’

claim does not satisfy either of these conditions. Therefore, we

decline to authorize Hughes to file a successive § 2255 motion. 

Hughes’ motions for appointment of counsel and for an

evidentiary hearing are denied. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
PRO JECT OVERVIEW

Union Station Redevelopment Corporation (USRC), in coordination with Amtrak, proposes to 

expand Washington Union Station and modernize the tracks and platforms.

Washington Union Station Expansion Project

May 2023

We want to hear from you! 

Visit the website to learn more and comment 

on the project:

www.wusstationexpansion.com 

 Accommodates projected long-term

ridership growth (through 2040):

 Enables more efficient train operations, 

easier boarding and ADA accessibility

 Provides more space for passenger

circulation and improved experience, 

and emergency egress

 Enhances multi-modal access and

capacity

Project Benefits

BACKGROUND

Washington Union Station, completed in 1908,

serves as the multimodal transportation hub to

37 million annual riders in the Washington, DC,

metropolitan area, linking: Amtrak intercity

trains; MARC and VRE commuter rail; WMATA

Metrorail; intercity and local bus services; DC

Streetcar and for-hire vehicles.

PROPOSED PROJECT COMPONENTS COST AND SCHEDULE

New 30-foot Wide

Train Platforms

New Below 

Track Concourses

New Bus Facility 

and Parking Garage

$8.81 Billion 

Construction Cost

13-Year1

Construction Time

New 1st and 2nd

Street Entrances

1 Estimates

Aerial view of Washington Union Station

Amtrak: 95%

MARC: 150%

VRE: 250%

Intercity Buses: 50%

In May 2023, the Federal Railroad 

Administration (FRA), as the lead federal 

agency, released a Supplemental Draft 

Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS) 

that describes impact of the new Preferred 

Alternative (Alternative F). 

Project Status

New 30

Train Platforms

New Bus Facility 

and Parking Garage

New Below 

Track Concourses
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OSAMA MIKHO ORAHA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 14-72123

Agency No. A096-742-979

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 15, 2016**

Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Osama Mikho Oraha, a native of Iraq and citizen of Canada, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s denial of his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8

U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. 

FILED

MAR 22 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition

for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion by denying as untimely Oraha’s

motion to reopen on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel, where he filed

the motion over two years after his final order of removal, see 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.23(b)(1), and he failed to demonstrate the due diligence necessary to

warrant equitable tolling of the filing deadline, see Avagyan v. Holder, 646 F.3d

672, 679 (9th Cir. 2011) (equitable tolling is available when a petitioner has

exercised due or reasonable diligence and tolling period should end . . .when

petitioner definitively learns of the harm resulting from counsel’s deficiency, or

obtains vital information bearing on the existence of his claim (internal quotation

marks and citation omitted)).

Because untimeliness is dispositive, we do not reach Oraha’s remaining

contentions regarding eligibility for relief from removal. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft,

371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (“As a general rule courts . . . are not required to

make findings on issues the decision of which is unnecessary to the results they

reach.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 

2 14-72123
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Union Planters Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Bobby L. Doxey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 281 

Honoring and thanking James Patrick Rohan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 19, 2005 

Mr. FRIST (for himself and Mr. REID) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring and thanking James Patrick Rohan. 

Whereas Assistant Chief of Police James Patrick Rohan, a 

native of the State of Maryland, has served the United 

States Capitol Police for thirty (30) years with distinction having been appointed as a Private on December 8, 

1975; 

Whereas Assistant Chief Rohan, having risen through the 

ranks to his current poisition over his longstanding career, has been instrumental in a variety of initiatives designed to enhance the security of the Congress; and 

Whereas Assistant Chief Rohan, who holds a Master of 

Science Degree in Justice/Law Enforcement from the 

American University and a Bachelor of Arts Degree in 

Law Enforcement from the University of Maryland, as 

well as numerous specialized law enforcement and secu-
2 

SRES 281 ATS

rity training accomplishments and honors: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate hereby honors and thanks 

2 James Patrick Rohan and his wife, Cecilia, and children, 

3 Ben, Natalie, Eric and David, and his entire family, for 

4 a lifelong professional commitment of service to the United 

5 States Capitol Police and the United States Congress. 

Æ
(logo) Grant Thornton

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

|  

 

 

  | Audit • Tax •Advisory 

Grant Thornton LLP

1201 Walnut St, Suite 2200

Kansas City, Missouri 64106

T 816.412.2400

F 816.412.2404 |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Board of Directors

Situs Holdings, LLC

 

We have examined management' s assertion, included in the accompanying Certification  Regarding Compliance with  Applicable  Servicing  Criteria (“Management's Assertion"), that Situs Holdings, LLC (the "Company") complied with servicing criteria set forth in Items  1117, 1119, 1122(d)(3)(i), 1122(d)(4)(i) and  1122(d)(4)(vii) of the U.S. Securities and  Exchange  Commission's Regulation  AB included in Appendix A as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, with respect to the Company's Operating or Trust Advisor Services performed over the deals listed in Appendix B (the “Platform”). Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Services and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination was not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's activities with respect to the Platform during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management's assertion that Situs Holdings, LLC complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

 

Kansas City, Missouri 

February 18, 2016
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ROBERT L. GRAY and ZILLAH R. )

JORDAN-GRAY a/k/a ZILLAH GRAY, )

)

Appellants, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-4085

)

U.S. BANK, N.A., as trustee, on behalf )

Of the J.P. Morgan Mortgage )

Acquisition Corp. 2006-FRE2 Asset )

Backed Pass-Through Certificates, )

Series 2006-FRE2; UNITED STATES )

OF AMERICA; UNKNOWN TENANT )

IN POSSESSION OF THE SUBJECT )

PROPERTY, )

)

Appellees. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed March 6, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Thomas H. Minkoff, Judge.

Robert E. Biasotti of Biasotti Law, St. 

Petersburg, for Appellants.

William L. Grimsley and Peter J. Maskow of 

McGlinchey Stafford, Jacksonville, for 

Appellee U.S. Bank, N.A., as trustee of 

behalf of the J.P. Morgan Mortgage 

Acquisition Corp. 2006-FRE2 Asset Backed 

Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-

FRE.

No appearance for remaining Appellees.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****United States, Alaska southcoast, Cook Inlet, Anchor Point to Kalgin Island**
 
pdf | jpg
 
SuDoc:C 55.418/7:16661/
Item Number:0191-B-15 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000918964
 
December 11, 2017