Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 241 / Tuesday, December 16, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 74647 

§ 721.10229 Ethylene glycol ethers. 

(a) Chemical substances and 

significant new uses subject to reporting. 

(1) The chemical substances identified 

in Table 1 of this paragraph are subject 

to reporting under this section for the 

significant new uses described in Table 

1 of this paragraph. 

TABLE 1—ETHYLENE GLYCOL ETHERS AND SIGNIFICANT NEW USES SUBJECT TO REPORTING

Chemical name 

Chemical 

Abstracts 

index name 

Chemical 

Abstracts 

Service 

Registry No. 

(CASRN) 

Significant new use(s) 

Monoethylene glycol dimethyl 

ether or monoglyme.

Ethane, 1,2,-dimethoxy- .......... 110–71–4 Any use in a consumer product. 

Diethylene glycol dimethyl ether 

or diglyme.

Ethane, 1,1′-oxybis[2-methoxy- 111–96–6 Any use in a consumer product. 

Diethylene glycol diethyl ether 

or ethyldiglyme.

Ethane, 1,1′-oxybis[2-ethoxy- .. 112–36–7 Any use in a consumer product except as a component of 

inks, coatings and adhesives, and as a component of paint/

graffiti removers. 

Triethylene glycol dimethyl 

ether or triglyme.

2,5,8,11-Tetraoxadodecane ..... 112–49–2 Any use in a consumer product, except as a solvent in consumer adhesives, in brake fluid, as a component of consumer paint/graffiti removers, and in consumer paints. 

Diethylene glycol dibutyl ether 

or butyldiglyme.

Butane, 1,1′-[oxybis(2,1- 

ethanediyloxy)]bis-.

112–73–2 Any use in a consumer product except as a solvent in consumer inks, coatings and adhesives, and as a component in 

soldering compounds. 

Ethylene glycol diethyl ether or 

ethylglyme.

Ethane, 1,2-diethoxy ................ 629–14–1 Any use in a consumer product. 

Triethylene glycol dibutyl ether 

or butyltriglyme.

5,8,11,14-Tetraoxaoctadecane 63512–36–7 Any use. 

(2) [Reserved] 

(b) [Reserved] 

[FR Doc. 2014–29429 Filed 12–15–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0703; FRL–9919–52– 

Region 9] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, Feather River Air 

Quality Management District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking direct final 

action to approve revisions to the 

Feather River Air Quality Management 

District (FRAQMD) portion of the 

California State Implementation Plan 

(SIP). These revisions concern 

emissions of particulate matter (PM), 

volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and 

oxides of nitrogen (NOX) from wood 

heating devices and open burning. We 

are approving local rules that regulate 

these emission sources under the Clean 

Air Act (CAA or the Act). 

DATES: This rule is effective on February 

17, 2015 without further notice, unless 

EPA receives adverse comments by 

January 15, 2015. If we receive such 

comments, we will publish a timely 

withdrawal in the Federal Register to 

notify the public that this direct final 

rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number EPA–R09– 

OAR–2014–0703, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions. 

2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel 

(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Instructions: All comments will be 

included in the public docket without 

change and may be made available 

online at www.regulations.gov, 

including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information that 

you consider CBI or otherwise protected 

should be clearly identified as such and 

should not be submitted through 

www.regulations.gov or email. 

www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, and EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send email 

directly to EPA, your email address will 

be automatically captured and included 

as part of the public comment. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: Generally, documents in the 

docket for this action are available 

electronically at www.regulations.gov 

and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California 94105–3901. While all 

documents in the docket are listed at 

www.regulations.gov, some information 

may be publicly available only at the 

hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted 

material, large maps), and some may not 

be publicly available in either location 

(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christine Vineyard, EPA Region IX, 

(415) 947–4125, vineyard.christine@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. The State’s Submittal 

A. What rules did the State submit? 

B. Are there other versions of these rules? 

C. What is the purpose of the submitted 

rules? 

II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action 

A. How is EPA evaluating the rules? 

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation 

criteria? 

C. EPA Recommendations To Further 

Improve the Rules 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
74648 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 241 / Tuesday, December 16, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

D. Public Comment and Final Action 

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. The State’s Submittal 

A. What rules did the State submit? 

Table 1 lists the rules we are 

approving with the dates that they were 

adopted by the local air agency and 

submitted by the California Air 

Resources Board (CARB). 

TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES

Local agency Rule No. Rule title Amended Submitted 

FRAQMD .......... 3.17 (except E.8 ‘‘. . . or other method approved by the 

Air Pollution Control Officer.’’ and F.2.e).

Wood Heating Devices ......... 10/05/09 07/25/14 

FRAQMD .......... 2.0 ......................................................................................... Open Burning ........................ 10/06/08 08/07/14 

On September 11, 2014, EPA 

determined that the submittals for 

FRAQMD Rules 3.17 and 2.0 met the 

completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 

Appendix V, which must be met before 

formal EPA review. 

When Rule 3.17 was amended on 

October 5, 2009, the resolution did not 

specifically direct the District to submit 

it to EPA as a SIP revision. The District 

adopted Resolution 2014–02 on 

February 3, 2014 directing staff to send 

Rule 3.17 to EPA as a SIP revision with 

minor changes discussed in EPA’s 

technical support document (TSD). 

B. Are there other versions of these 

rules? 

There is no previous version of Rule 

3.17 in the California SIP. 

In the late-1970s and 1980s, Sutter 

County and Yuba County adopted open 

burning rules which were approved by 

the EPA for inclusion into the California 

SIP for these counties. In March 2004, 

these rules were locally merged into 

Rule 2.0, to apply District-wide and 

amended again locally in October 2008. 

On August 7, 2014, CARB submitted 

Rule 2.0 to the EPA for inclusion into 

the California SIP, specifying this rule 

would supersede the Sutter County and 

Yuba County rules currently in the 

California SIP as listed below. 

TABLE 2—RULES TO BE SUPERSEDED 1

Rule 

No. Title Approval date Citation 

Sutter County 

2.1 ............ Exceptions to Rule 2.0 ...................................................................................................................... 04/12/1982 47 FR 15585 

2.2 ............ APCO May Issue Burn Permit ........................................................................................................... 04/12/1982 47 FR 15585 

2.3 ............ Burning on ’’No-Burn’’ Days .............................................................................................................. 04/12/1982 47 FR 15585 

2.4 ............ Exception to Rule 2.3 ........................................................................................................................ 04/12/1982 47 FR 15585 

2.5 ............ Permit Regulations ............................................................................................................................ 02/03/1987 52 FR 3226 

2.6 ............ Burning Hours .................................................................................................................................... 04/12/1982 47 FR 15585 

2.7 ............ Agricultural Burning Requirement ...................................................................................................... 04/12/1982 47 FR 15585 

2.8 ............ Range Improvement and Property Being Developed for Commercial or Residential Purposes ...... 04/12/1982 47 FR 15585 

2.82 .......... Open Burning of Waste Wood on Property Where Grown ............................................................... 01/26/1982 47 FR 3550 

2.9 ............ Prohibited Burning ............................................................................................................................. 04/12/1982 47 FR 15585 

2.10 .......... Exceptions ......................................................................................................................................... 04/12/1982 47 FR 15585 

2.11 .......... Fire Prevention .................................................................................................................................. 04/12/1982 47 FR 15585 

2.12 .......... Designated Agencies ......................................................................................................................... 04/12/1982 47/FR 15585 

2.14 .......... Reduction of Odorous Matter ............................................................................................................ 09/22/1972 37 FR 19812 

2.15 .......... Orchard and Citrus Heaters .............................................................................................................. 04/12/1982 47 FR 15585 

2.16 .......... Cost of Putting Out a Fire ................................................................................................................. 04/12/1982 47 FR 15585 

Yuba County 

2.0 ............ Open Fires ......................................................................................................................................... 04/17/1987 52 FR 12523 

2.1 ............ Exceptions to Rule 2.0 ...................................................................................................................... 04/17/1987 52 FR 12523 

2.2 ............ APCO May Issue Burn Permit ........................................................................................................... 01/26/1982 47 FR 3550 

2.3 ............ Burning on ‘‘No Burn’’ Days .............................................................................................................. 04/17/1987 52 FR 12523 

2.4 ............ Exceptions to Rule 2.3 ...................................................................................................................... 01/26/1982 

04/12/1982 

47 FR 3550 

47 FR 15585 

2.5 ............ Permit Regulations ............................................................................................................................ 04/17/1987 52 FR 12523 

2.6 ............ Burning Hours .................................................................................................................................... 04/17/1987 52 FR 12523 

2.7 ............ Agricultural Burning Requirements .................................................................................................... 04/17/1987 52 FR 12523 

2.8 ............ Forest Management Range Improvement and Property Being Developed for Commercial or Residential Purposes.01/26/1982 47 FR 3550 

2.9 ............ Prohibited Burning ............................................................................................................................. 04/17/1987 52 FR 12523 

2.10 .......... Exceptions ......................................................................................................................................... 01/26/1982 47 FR 3550 

2.11 .......... Fire Prevention .................................................................................................................................. 04/17/1987 52 FR 12523 

2.12 .......... Designated Agencies ......................................................................................................................... 01/26/1982 47 FR 3550 

2.14 .......... Pressure Tank ................................................................................................................................... 09/22/1972 37 FR 19812 

2.15 .......... Orchard and Citrus Heaters .............................................................................................................. 01/26/1982 47 FR 3550 

2.16 .......... Cost of Putting Out a Fire ................................................................................................................. 04/17/1987 52 FR 12523 

1 In some places the rule numbers contain an addition ‘‘0’’ (e.g. 2.01, 2.02, etc.). However, the original rules, as approved into the California 

SIP, were numbered as shown in Table 2. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 241 / Tuesday, December 16, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 74649 

C. What is the purpose of the submitted 

rules? 

Open burning emits PM, including 

particulate matter of ten microns or less 

(PM10) and particulate matter of 2.5 

microns or less (PM2.5), directly, as well 

as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) 

and oxides of nitrogen (NOX), which are 

precursors to ozone and PM2.5. PM and 

ozone contribute to effects that are 

harmful to human health and the 

environment, including premature 

mortality, aggravation of respiratory and 

cardiovascular disease, decreased lung 

function, visibility impairment, and 

damage to vegetation and ecosystems. 

Section 110(a) of the CAA requires 

States to submit regulations that control 

direct PM, VOC and NOX emissions. 

Rule 3.17 reduces inhalable PM 

emissions from residential wood heating 

devices, to achieve the same emission 

limits as other wood appliances, and to 

increase public awareness in Yuba and 

Sutter Counties. The burning of 

unseasoned wood is prohibited and any 

new or used wood heating device must 

be an EPA certified wood heating 

device. 

Rule 2.0 minimizes the impacts of 

smoke and other air pollutants 

generated by open burning and assures 

that it is managed consistent with state 

and federal law. The TSDs have more 

information about these rules. 

II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action 

A. How is EPA evaluating the rules? 

Generally, SIP rules must be 

enforceable (see section 110(a) of the 

Act) and must not relax existing 

requirements (see sections 110(l) and 

193). In addition, SIP rules must 

implement Reasonably Available 

Control Measures (RACM), including 

Reasonably Available Control 

Technology (RACT), in moderate PM10

and PM2.5 nonattainment areas, and Best 

Available Control Measures (BACM), 

including Best Available Control 

Technology (BACT), in serious PM10

and PM2.5 nonattainment areas (see CAA 

sections 189(a)(1) and 189(b)(1)). In 

addition, CAA section 172(c)(1) requires 

nonattainment areas to implement all 

reasonably available control measures 

(RACM) as expeditiously as practicable. 

FRAQMD is currently designated 

attainment for PM10. Therefore, Rule 

2.0, Open Burning, and Rule 3.17, Wood 

Heating Devices, are not required to 

implement RACM or BACM with 

respect to PM–10. 

The Yuba City-Marysville area, which 

is under FRAQMD jurisdiction, is 

designated nonattainment for the 2006 

24-hour PM2.5 National Ambient Air 

Quality Standard (NAAQS). However, 

on January 10, 2013 (78 FR 2211), EPA 

issued a determination that the area had 

attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5

standard based on complete, qualityassured, and certified ambient air 

monitoring data for the 2009–2011 

monitoring period. Under EPA’s Clean 

Data Policy and the regulations that 

embody it, 40 CFR 51.1004(c) (for 

PM2.5), an EPA rulemaking 

determination that an area is attaining 

the relevant standard suspends the 

area’s obligations to submit RACM for as 

long as the area continues to attain. As 

a result, we are not evaluating Rule 2.0 

for compliance with RACM 

requirements for PM2.5 at this time. In 

addition, on May 23, 2013, CARB 

requested that EPA redesignate the Yuba 

City-Marysville PM2.5 nonattainment 

area to attainment for the 2006 24-hour 

PM2.5 NAAQS. If the Yuba CityMarysville area is redesignated to 

attainment, RACM requirements for 

PM2.5 will no longer apply. 

FRAQMD regulates a portion of the 

Sacramento Metro ozone nonattainment 

area, which is classified as Severe-15 

under the 1997 and 2008 NAAQS for 

ozone (40 CFR 81.305). Therefore, 

FRAQMD must implement RACM for 

open burning and wood heating devices 

if those measures will advance 

attainment of ozone NAAQS, when 

considered collectively with other 

reasonable measures. Additional control 

measures may be required pursuant to 

CAA § 172(c)(1) if both: (1) Additional 

measures are reasonably available; and 

(2) these additional reasonably available 

measures will advance attainment in the 

area when considered collectively. EPA 

acts on the State’s RACM 

demonstrations separately based on an 

evaluation of the control measures 

submitted as a whole and their overall 

potential to advance the applicable 

attainment date. 

Guidance and policy documents that 

we use to evaluate enforceability 

include the following: 

1. ‘‘Issues Relating to VOC Regulation 

Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations; 

Clarification to Appendix D of November 24, 

1987 Federal Register Notice,’’ (Blue Book), 

notice of availability published in the May 

25, 1988 Federal Register. 

2. ‘‘Guidance Document for Correcting 

Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies,’’ 

EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little 

Bluebook). 

3. ‘‘State Implementation Plans; General 

Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of 

the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,’’ 57 

FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 

(April 28, 1992). 

4. ‘‘State Implementation Plans for Serious 

PM–10 Nonattainment Areas, and 

Attainment Date Waivers for PM–10 

Nonattainment Areas Generally; Addendum 

to the General Preamble for the 

Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act 

Amendments of 1990,’’ 59 FR 41998 (August 

16, 1994). 

5. ‘‘PM–10 Guideline Document,’’ EPA 

452/R–93–008, April 1993. 

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation 

criteria? 

We believe these rules area consistent 

with the relevant policy and guidance 

regarding enforceability, and SIP 

relaxations. The TSDs have more 

information on our evaluation. 

C. EPA Recommendations To Further 

Improve the Rules 

The TSDs describes additional rule 

revisions that we recommend for the 

next time the local agency modifies Rule 

2.0, Opening Burning, and Rule 3.17, 

Wood Heating Devices. 

D. Public Comment and Final Action 

As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of 

the Act, EPA is fully approving the 

submitted rules because we believe they 

fulfill all relevant requirements. We do 

not think anyone will object to this 

approval, so we are finalizing it without 

proposing it in advance. However, in 

the Proposed Rules section of this 

Federal Register, we are simultaneously 

proposing approval of the same 

submitted rules. If we receive adverse 

comments by January 15, 2015, we will 

publish a timely withdrawal in the 

Federal Register to notify the public 

that the direct final approval will not 

take effect and we will address the 

comments in a subsequent final action 

based on the proposal. If we do not 

receive timely adverse comments, the 

direct final approval will be effective 

without further notice on February 17, 

2015. This will incorporate these rules 

into the federally enforceable SIP. 

Please note that if EPA receives 

adverse comment on an amendment, 

paragraph, or section of this rule and if 

that provision may be severed from the 

remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt 

as final those provisions of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. 

III. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

State choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 

Accordingly, this action merely 

approves State law as meeting Federal 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
74650 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 241 / Tuesday, December 16, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by State law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address 

disproportionate human health or 

environmental effects with practical, 

appropriate, and legally permissible 

methods under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the State, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by February 17, 

2015. Filing a petition for 

reconsideration by the Administrator of 

this final rule does not affect the finality 

of this action for the purposes of judicial 

review nor does it extend the time 

within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. Parties with objections to this 

direct final rule are encouraged to file a 

comment in response to the parallel 

notice of proposed rulemaking for this 

action published in the Proposed Rules 

section of today’s Federal Register, 

rather than file an immediate petition 

for judicial review of this direct final 

rule, so that EPA can withdraw this 

direct final rule and address the 

comment in the proposed rulemaking. 

This action may not be challenged later 

in proceedings to enforce its 

requirements (see section 307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen 

dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: October 16, 2014. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart F—California 

■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by 

adding paragraphs (c)(447) and (c)(448) 

to read as follows: 

§ 52.220 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(447) New and amended regulations 

were submitted on July 25, 2014, by the 

Governor’s designee. 

(i) Incorporation by Reference. 

(A) Feather River Air Quality 

Management District. 

(1) Rule 3.17 (except specific 

provisions of subsections E.8, F.2 and 

F.4), ‘‘Wood Heating Devices,’’ amended 

on October 5, 2009. 

(448) New and amended regulations 

were submitted on August 15, 2014, by 

the Governor’s designee. 

(i) Incorporation by Reference. 

(A) Feather River Air Quality 

Management District. 

(1) Rule 2.0, ‘‘Open Burning,’’ 

amended on October 6, 2008. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29285 Filed 12–15–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

44 CFR Part 64 

[Docket ID FEMA–2014–0002; Internal 

Agency Docket No. FEMA–8361] 

Suspension of Community Eligibility 

AGENCY: Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, DHS. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This rule identifies 

communities where the sale of flood 

insurance has been authorized under 

the National Flood Insurance Program 

(NFIP) that are scheduled for 

suspension on the effective dates listed 

within this rule because of 

noncompliance with the floodplain 

management requirements of the 

program. If the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency (FEMA) receives 

documentation that the community has 

adopted the required floodplain 

management measures prior to the 

effective suspension date given in this 

rule, the suspension will not occur and 

a notice of this will be provided by 

publication in the Federal Register on a 

subsequent date. Also, information 

identifying the current participation 

status of a community can be obtained 

from FEMA’s Community Status Book 

(CSB). The CSB is available at http://

www.fema.gov/fema/csb.shtm. 

DATES: The effective date of each 

community’s scheduled suspension is 

the third date (‘‘Susp.’’) listed in the 

third column of the following tables. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you want to determine whether a 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES