alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 374 

To authorize testimony, document production, and legal representation in 

United States of America v. David Hossein Safavian. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2006 

Mr. FRIST (for himself and Mr. REID) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony, document production, and legal representation in United States of America v. David Hossein 

Safavian. 

Whereas, in the case of United States of America v. David 

Hossein Safavian, Crim. No. 05–370, pending in the 

United States District Court for the District of Columbia, testimony and documents have been requested from 

Bryan D. Parker, an employee on the staff of the Committee on Indian Affairs; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their 

official responsibilities; 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

SRES 374 ATS

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistently with the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Bryan D. Parker, and any other em2 ployee of the Committee on Indian Affairs from whom tes3 timony or the production of documents may be required, 

4 are authorized to testify and produce documents in the 

5 case of United States of America v. David Hossein 

6 Safavian, except concerning matters for which a privilege 

7 should be asserted. 

8 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

9 represent Bryan D. Parker, and any other Members, offi10 cers, or employees of the Senate, in connection with the 

11 testimony and document production authorized in section 

12 one of this resolution. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
No. 51170.

#### Protests 929751-G, etc., of Perrin Cooper & Co., Ltd. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of goatskins similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Winograd*(32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302). In accordance therewith the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained. Protest 929751-G, having been abandoned insofar as it covered entry WHB-40837, was overruled.
Case No. 5,475.

#### In re GLASER.

[1 N. B. R. 241 (Quarto, 18).] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

Jan. 14, 1808.

Affidavit to Stay Pkoceedings is State Cooets.

In bankruptcy.

“Siegmund Spingarn being duly sworn says, he is one of the copartners of the firm of Morrison, Lauterbach & Spingarn, attorneys at law. That Henry Morrison, one of the said firm, is the attorney of record of the said Louis Glaser, the petitioner for adjudication of bankruptcy. That the petition of said Louis Glaser was filed on the 13th day of January, 188S, by this deponent. That before the filing of said petition, several creditors of the said Louis Glaser commenced actions for the recovery of money due and owing to them from said Louis Glaser. That on the 9th day of January, 1S68, one L. H. Mandlebaum commenced an action in the Second district court of the city of New York, which action is now at issue and placed for trial. That on the same day a creditor named James Cohen commenced an action in the same court against the said Louis Glaser, the summons in which case is returnable on the 15th day of January, 1868. That on the same day George C. Eyland commenced an action in the marine court of the city of New York, against the said Louis Glaser, which action is now pending. That on the same day the firm of A. Altmayer & Co. commenced an action in the same court, to wit, the marine court, in which action the summons is returnable January 17,1S6S. Thaton the 10th day of January, 1868, Isaac Yau Deusen, John Van Deusen, and Henry Boehmer commenced an action in the supreme court of the state of New York, against the said Louis Glaser. Deponent further says, that the petitioner, Louis Glaser, has no valid and legal defence to interpose in any of these cases, and that they will recover judgment, unless restrained by order of this honorable court. Deponent further says that all these actions are brought to recover debts due by the said petitioner, Louis Glaser, which are set out in the schedule attached to the petition for adjudication of bankruptcy. That they are all debts provable under the act of congress passed March 2, 1867 [14 Stat. 517], and from which the petitioner may be discharged in bankruptcy. Sieg. Spingarn.

1

 [Reprinted by permission.]

*467“Sworn to before me, this 14th day of January, 1868. R. E. Stilwell, U. S. Commissioner.”

[See Case No. 5,474.]
** **

**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trinity CapitalCorporation, a New Mexico corporation (the “Company”), for the period endedMarch 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), William C. Enloe, as President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  William C. Enloe                  |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| William  C. Enloe                      |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |
| May 6,  2005                           |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50882

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ARTURO MORENO-GARZA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:07-CR-72-ALL

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Arturo Moreno-Garza

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty

provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v.

Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug.

28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 12, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 44195.

#### Protests 970494-G, etc., of K. F. Griffiths & Co., Inc. (New York)

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Chrystal*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 78, C. D. 291) the merchandise in question was held dutiable as pumice stone, unmanufactured, at one-tenth of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 206 as claimed.
Exhibit 32


                          UNISOURCE ENERGY CORPORATION

                          TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY

                              ---------------------

                        STATEMENTS OF CORPORATE OFFICERS
           (Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

                              ---------------------

     Each of the undersigned, James S. Pignatelli, Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer of UniSource Energy Corporation and Tucson
Electric Power Company (each a "Company"), and Kevin P. Larson, Vice President,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of each Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that each Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of such Company.


November 4, 2005

                                             /s/ James S. Pignatelli
                              --------------------------------------------------
                                                 James S. Pignatelli
                                        Chairman of the Board, President and
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                            UniSource Energy Corporation
                                           Tucson Electric Power Company


                                              /s/ Kevin P. Larson
                              --------------------------------------------------
                                                   Kevin P. Larson
                                       Senior Vice President, Treasurer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                            UniSource Energy Corporation
                                           Tucson Electric Power Company
# Official Journal C 8/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 8 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 657 January 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 8

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 657 January 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 8/01 | Appointment of the standing high-level independent Chair and Vice-Chair of the Panel referred to in Article 143 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 8/01

Appointment of the standing high-level independent Chair and Vice-Chair of the Panel referred to in Article 143 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 8/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10448 – MABANAFT / H&R / P2X) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2022/C 8/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10581 – SPIE / STRUKTON SERVICES) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| 2022/C 8/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10491 – Allianz/Intelsat) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 5 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2022/C 8/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10448 – MABANAFT / H&R / P2X) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

2

2022/C 8/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10581 – SPIE / STRUKTON SERVICES) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

2022/C 8/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10491 – Allianz/Intelsat) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
No. 58197.

protests 156735-K, 171441-K, and 184080-K (Los Angeles).

#### Quon Quon Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles in question consist of trays, brass iron trays, and/or silent butlers the same in all material respects as those involved in *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), *The Fan Co.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), and *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Regency
Affiliates, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Laurence S. Levy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
            Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of
            operations of the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: August 15, 2005


                                                /s/ Neil N. Hasson
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Neil N. Hasson
                                                Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Regency Affiliates, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Laurence S. Levy,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.





Dated:  September
17, 2009





By: /s/ Laurence S.
Levy


Laurence
S. Levy


President
and Chief Executive Officer
```

[104th Congress Public Law 243]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ243.104]

[[Page 110 STAT. 3143]]

Public Law 104-243
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
        construction of a hydroelectric project in the State of 
              Ohio. <<NOTE: Oct. 9, 1996 -  [H.R. 1011]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

    Notwithstanding the time limitations of section 13 of the Federal 
Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, upon 
the request of the licensee for FERC Project No. 9423 (and after 
reasonable notice), is authorized, in accordance with the good faith, 
due diligence, and public interest requirements of such section 13 and 
the Commission's procedures under such section, to extend the time 
required for commencement of construction for the project for up to a 
maximum of 3 consecutive 2-year periods. <<NOTE: Effective date.>>  This 
section shall take effect for the project upon the expiration of the 
extension (issued by the Commission under such section 13) of the period 
required for commencement of construction of such project.

    Approved October 9, 1996.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1011 (S. 468):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104-317 (Comm. on Commerce).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 104-104 accompanying S. 468 (Comm. on Energy and 
Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 141 (1995):
                                    Nov. 13, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 142 (1996):
                                    Sept. 27, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Michael S. Gross, Chief Executive Officer of
Solar Senior Capital Ltd. certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Solar Senior Capital Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Dated this 22nd day of February 2012.



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/    MICHAEL S.
GROSS
|    |  | Michael S. Gross       
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
November 8, 1999


Board of Directors
Tasty Baking Company
2801 Hunting Park Avenue
Philadelphia, PA 19129

Dear Directors:

We are  providing  this letter to you for  inclusion  as an exhibit to your Form
10-Q filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have been provided a copy of the Company's  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period  ended  September  25,  1999.  Note 4 therein  describes  a change in
accounting  principle  from the  last-in,  first-out  (LIFO)  method of  valuing
inventories to the first-in,  first-out  (FIFO) method.  It should be understood
that the  preferability of one acceptable  method of accounting over another for
valuing  inventories  has not been  addressed  in any  authoritative  accounting
literature,   and  in  expressing  our  concurrence  below  we  have  relied  on
management's   determination  that  this  change  in  accounting   principle  is
preferable.   Based  on  our  reading  of   management's   stated   reasons  and
justification for this change in accounting  principle in the Form 10-Q, and our
discussions  with  management as to their judgment  about the relevant  business
planning  factors  relating to the change,  we concur with  management that such
change represents, in the Company's circumstances,  the adoption of a preferable
accounting principle in conformity with Accounting  Principles Board Opinion No.
20.

We have not audited any  financial  statements  of the Company as of any date or
for any period  subsequent to December 26, 1998.  Accordingly,  our comments are
subject  to  change  upon  completion  of an audit of the  financial  statements
covering the period of the accounting change.

Very truly yours,



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
EXHIBIT 15.1 

January 7, 2010 

Board of Directors 

Texas Industries, Inc. 

We areaware of the incorporation by reference in the Post-Effective Amendment Number 9 to Registration Statement Number 2-48986 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 33-53715 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-11604 on Form S-8 (asamended), Registration Statement Number 333-121860 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-50517 on Form S-3 (as amended) and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated January 7, 2010 relating to the unaudited consolidated interimfinancial statements of Texas Industries, Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2009. 

 

Fort Worth, Texas