alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

** **

** **

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February1, 2016, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLANDLOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as SpecialServicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian,and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and AssetRepresentations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, COMM 2016-CCRE28 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized termsused herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made
to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2016, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING
CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC
BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor
and Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C1 (the "Agreement").
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.11
of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer
during the period from April 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per
the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.









Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 
Wells Fargo Bank

























Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Case: 2:12-cv-00856-EAS-EPD Doc #: 35 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 1 of 16  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00856-EAS-EPD Doc #: 35 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 2 of 16  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00856-EAS-EPD Doc #: 35 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 3 of 16  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00856-EAS-EPD Doc #: 35 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 4 of 16  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00856-EAS-EPD Doc #: 35 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 5 of 16  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00856-EAS-EPD Doc #: 35 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 6 of 16  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00856-EAS-EPD Doc #: 35 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 7 of 16  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00856-EAS-EPD Doc #: 35 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 8 of 16  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00856-EAS-EPD Doc #: 35 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 9 of 16  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00856-EAS-EPD Doc #: 35 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 10 of 16  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00856-EAS-EPD Doc #: 35 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 11 of 16  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00856-EAS-EPD Doc #: 35 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 12 of 16  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00856-EAS-EPD Doc #: 35 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 13 of 16  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00856-EAS-EPD Doc #: 35 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 14 of 16  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00856-EAS-EPD Doc #: 35 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 15 of 16  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00856-EAS-EPD Doc #: 35 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 16 of 16  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T09:39:11-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
(logo)CohnReznick

Advisory ∙Assurance ∙ Tax

 

CohnReznickLLP

cohnreznick.com

 

 

Report ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

ToTorchlight Loan Services, LLC

 

Wehave examined management of Torchlight Loan Services, LLC("Torchlight")'s assertion that Torchlight complied with theservicing criteria applicable to it under paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of theSecurities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")'s Regulation AB for thecommercial mortgage-backed securities transactions that were issued on or afterDecember 1, 2002 and that were registered with the SEC pursuant to theSecurities Act of 1933 for which Torchlight acted as the special servicerlisted in Appendix B ("Platform") included in the accompanyingManagement's Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable ServicingCriteria on SEC Regulation AB as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019.Torchlight's management is responsible for its assertion. Our responsibility isto express an opinion on management's assertion about Torchlight's compliancewith the specified requirements based on our examination.

 

Managementhas determined that the criteria set forth in Sections 1122 (d)(1)(iii),(d)(3)(i)(C), (d)(3)(i)(D), (d)(3)(ii), (d)(3)(iii), (d)(3)(iv), (d)(4)(iv),(d)(4)(v), (d)(4)(ix), (d)(4)(x), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii), (d)(4)(xiii),(d)(4)(xiv), and (d)(4)(xv) are not applicable to the activities performed byTorchlight as a special servicer with respect to Torchlight's Platform.

 

Ourexamination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards establishedby the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Thosestandards require that we plan and perform the examination to obtain reasonableassurance about whether management's assertion about compliance with thespecified requirements is fairly stated, in all material respects. Anexamination involves performing procedures to obtain evidence about whethermanagement's assertion is fairly stated, in all material respects. The nature,timing, and extent of the procedures selected depend on our judgment, includingan assessment of the risks of material misstatement of management's assertion,whether due to fraud or error. We believe that the evidence we obtained issufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Ourexamination does not provide a legal determination on Torchlight's compliancewith the specified requirements.

 

Inour opinion, management's assertion that Torchlight complied with the servicingcriteria applicable to it under paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of the SEC'sRegulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions thatwere issued on or after December 1, 2002 and that were registered with the SECpursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 for which Torchlight acted as thespecial servicer included in the accompanying Management's CertificationRegarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria on SEC Regulation AB isfairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/CohnReznick LLP

 

Bethesda,Maryland 

February19, 2020
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 00-4418



# 
J OEL J AIMES A VILES , a/k/a Felix Jaimes, Defendant-Appellant. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-99-261)
Submitted: February 16, 2001
Decided: March 26, 2001
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL
J. Matthew Martin, MARTIN & MARTIN, P.A., Hillsborough, North Carolina, for Appellant. Walter C. Holton, Jr., United States Attorney, Sandra J. Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM: Joel Jaimes Aviles appeals his conviction following a jury trial for (1) conspiracy to distribute cocaine hydrochloride in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1994); (2) possession with intent to distribute cocaine hydrochloride in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a)(West 1994 & Supp. 2000); and (3) possession of a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense, aiding and abetting that crime in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 924(c) & 2 (West 2000). In the sole issue raised by Aviles in this appeal, he contends that the district court erred indenying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 29 motion for acquittal because the evidence was insufficient to prove that he knowingly participated in the offenses.This court reviews the denial of a motion for acquittal under a sufficiency of the evidence standard. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 29; See Glasser v. United States , 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942); United States v. Romer , 148 F.3d 359, 364 (4th Cir. 1998). The sufficiency of the evidence in a criminal case is determined by viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the government. The conviction must be affirmed if the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the government, is sufficient for any rational jury to find the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Burgos , 94F.3d 849, 862 (4th Cir. 1996). In evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, we do not review the credibility of the witnesses, and we assume that the jury resolved all contradictions in the testimony in favor of the government. Romer , 148 F.3d at 364.We have reviewed the record and briefs and find sufficient evidence to support Aviles’ conviction. Accordingly, we affirm Aviles’ conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. A VILES
Exhibit
10.10


 


SUPPLEMENTARY
AGREEMENT NO. 2 FOR JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT


 


This
SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT NO. 2 FOR JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT is entered into as of the 9th day of March, 2022 by and between
NEXALIN TECHNOLOGY, INC. (’‘Nexalin”) and WIDER COM LIMITED (“Wider”). Nexalin and Wider are sometimes individually
referred to as a ’‘Party” and collectively as the “Parties”.


 


WHEREAS,
the Parties have previously entered into a Joint Venture Agreement dated as of September 21, 2018, as supplemented by a Supplementary
Agreement dated as of May 22, 2019 (the “Original Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS,
the Parties have determined it to be in their best interests to amend or modify certain covenants, terms, and conditions of the Original
Agreement, as described herein.


 


NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the Parties
agree to the following.


 


1. All
terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Original Agreement.


 


2.
The Parties have not established the JV as of the date hereof. The Parties acknowledge to each other that their ability to establish
the JV has been impacted by (i) legal and regulatory changes in the United States and the People’s Republic of China,
including changes related to investments in, or operations related to, entities with ownership of entities or operations or intended
operations in the People’s Republic of China and (ii) changing business plans or intended use and markets for the Nexalin
Products. The Parties re-confirm their mutual commitment and covenants to continue their reasonable commercial efforts to establish
the JV as intended by the Original Agreement.


 


3.
The Parties will use their reasonable commercial efforts to negotiate, execute and deliver further documentation, including without limitation,
one or more Services Agreements, Distribution Agreements and JV Documents related to the establishment, funding and management of the
JV and the intended treatments, product markets and uses for the Nexalin Products within the next 180 days from the date hereof.




 


4.
All references to December 21, 2018, including, without limitation, references contained in Sections 2.3 and 3.3 are hereby modified
and amended to read September 30, 2022.


 


5.
Each Party hereby waives any existing Events of Default under the Original Agreement that it may have or assert as of the date hereof.




 


6. This
Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts and by facsimile and/or by e-mail, and all executed counterparts together shall constitute
the original instrument.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this executed to be duly authorized and executed as of the 9th day of March, 2022.


 


	WIDER COM LIMITED	 	NEXALIN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ ZHU YUN	 	By:	/s/ Mark White
	Name:	ZHU YUN	 	Name:	Mark White
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Rideshare: don't end up on the rocks!

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Rideshare: don't end up on the rocks! 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Veterans Administration 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  Veterans Administration 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Lighthouse on rocky coast. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  171 × 49 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  019406329.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Case: 2:12-cv-01192-EAS-EPD Doc #: 58 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T16:48:45-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: Glenn P Johnson <glenn.p.johnson@dom.com> Date: 7/22/2010 3:21 PM Subject: Re: Dominion Facilities Extension Request Attachments: pic22988.gif; Dominion Facilities ELG-ICR Extension Request.pdf

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension requ est for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the following Dominion Resources Services facilities:

Altavista Power Station Brayton Point Kewaunee Kincaid Generation LLC Manchester Street Morgantown Energy Salem Harbor State Line Energy Bremo Bluff Chesapeake Chesterfield Clover Gordonsville Hopewell Mecklenburg Mt. Storm North Branch Possum Point Southampton Yorktown

The deadline for your plant to submit Version 1 and Version 2 of the completed questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. Please note that the deadline for Part G, if applicable, is unchanged and remains 120 days after receipt of the questionnaire. No extensions are granted for Version 3 or Version 4 of the questionnaire; the deadline for plants receiving these questionnaires remains 90 days after receipt.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic22988.gif)

From: Glenn P Johnson <glenn.p.johnson@dom.com>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPACc: Pamela Faggert <pamela.fagger t@dom.com>, Cathy C Taylor <cathy.c.taylor@dom.com>, Karen K Canody <karen.k.canody@dom.com>, JAMES R BELL <james.r.bell@dom.com>, Michael B Gregory <michael.b.gregory@dom.com>

Date: 07/09/2010 02:35 PM

Subject: Dominion Facilities Extension Request

Dear Ms. Alicea:

Please find attached, an electronic copy of the extension request for the twenty (20) Dominion facilities that have received Information Collection Requests for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines. Thank you for consideration of our request.

Sincerely,

Glenn Johnson Supervisor, Environmental Regulation Dominion Resources Services, Inc. 5000 Dominion Boulevard, Glen Allen, VA 23060 Phone: 804-273-2946 Tie Line: 8-730-2946

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains information which may be legally confidential and or privileged and does not in any case represent a firm ENERGY COMMODITY bid or offer relating thereto which binds the sender without an additional express written confirmation to that effect. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of th e contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.(See attached file: Dominion Facilities ELG-ICR Extension Request.pdf)
March 23, 1972

No. 72-11

#### William W. O’Reilly, Jr., U. S. Marine Corps v United States.

On consideration of the Petition for Appropriate Relief filed in the above-entitled action, it appearing that petitioner seeks review of an interlocutory ruling of the military judge made in the course of a pretrial hearing conducted pursuant to Article 39(a), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 839(a), it is, by the Court, this 23d day of March 1972,

ORDERED:

That said Petition be, and the same is hereby, dismissed. See, United States v Best, 6 USCMA 39, 19 CMR 165 (1955); Henderson v Wondolowski, 21 USCMA 63, 44 CMR 117 (1971).
O pinion filed February 4 , 2021



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

___ ___ ____ No. 11

- 20

- 00 210

- C V

____ __ ____ IN THE INTEREST OF K.B

. , A C HILD

On Appeal from the 29 th District Court Palo Pinto County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. C48674

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N This is an appeal from a final order in which the trial court terminated the parental rights of K.B. ’s mother and father

. See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 161.001 (West Supp. 20 20 ). The mo ther filed a notice of appeal. We affirm

. Appellant ’s court

- appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and a supporting brief in which he professionally and conscientiously examines the record
and applicable law and conclude s that the appeal presents no issues of arguable merit
and is therefore frivolous. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and
demonstr ating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See In re2 Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403 , 406

– 08 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); High v. State , 573
S.W.2d 807 , 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). In light of a holding by the Texas Supreme Court, however, a n Anders motion to withdraw “ may be premature ” if filed in the court of appeals under the circumstances presented in this case. See In
re P.M. , 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 (Tex. 2016). The court in P.M. stated that “a ppointed
counsel ’ s obligations can be satisfied by filing a petition for review that satisfies the
standards for an Anders brief. ” I d. at 27

– 28. Appellant’s counsel provided Appellant with a copy of the brief and the
motion to withdraw

. In compliance with Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 318

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014), counsel provided Appellant with a copy of the record in this
cause and informed Ap pellant of h er right to review the record and file a pro se response to counsel’s brief. W e conclude that Appellant’s couns el has satisfied his
dut ies under Anders , Schulman , and Kelly

. We note that Appellant has not f ile d a pro se response to counsel’s Anders
brief and motion to withdraw. F ollowing the procedures outlined in Anders and
Schulman , we have independently reviewed the record in this cause , and we agree that the appeal is frivolous

. However, in light of P.M. , we must deny the motion to withdraw that was filed by Appellant ’s court

- appointed counsel. See P.M. , 520
S.W.3d at 27

. Accordingly, we deny counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the trial
court’s order of termination

.

PER CURIAM February 4 , 2021
Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trott er , J., and W illiams, J.