alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018052EN.01000201.xml

| 12.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 December 2017 — Federal Republic of Germany v Council of the European Union

(Case C-600/14) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - External action of the European Union - Article 216(1) TFEU - Article 218(9) TFEU - Establishment of the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union in a body set up by an international agreement - Revision Committee of the Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail (OTIF) - Amendment of the Convention concerning International Carriage by Rail (COTIF) and the Appendices thereto - Competence shared between the European Union and its Member States - External competence of the European Union in an area where the Union has not yet adopted common rules - Validity of Decision 2014/699/EU - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of sincere cooperation))

(2018/C 052/02)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and J. Möller, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Interveners in support of the applicant: French Republic (represented initially by D. Colas, G. de Bergues and M. Hours, acting as Agents, and subsequently by D. Colas and M.-L. Kitamura, acting as Agents), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by C. Brodie, M. Holt and D. Robertson, acting as Agents, and by J. Holmes QC)

Interveners in support of the applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Finnegan, Z. Kupčová and J.-P. Hix, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by F. Erlbacher, W. Mölls and J. Hottiaux, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the French Republic, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the European Commission to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the French Republic, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the European Commission to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 73, 2.3.2015.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Angela
D. Toppi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Trans-Lux
Corporation, do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

    (1) The Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

    This Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not
be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Registrant or
the certifying officer.



                                       /s/ Angela D. Toppi
                                       --------------------------------
Date:  August 14, 2009                 Angela D. Toppi
                                       Executive Vice President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer
1 

### King, Melanie

Subject: FW: Mods rule - think this should be very close

Attachments: EO12866_GHG EGU ModifiedSources 2060-AR88 Proposal__20140530.docx

From: Culligan, Kevin

Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 4:58 PM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Subject: Mods rule

‐ think this should be very close

Would be very good for you to check language we discussed this morning and make sure I got it right.
(Reap. Dec. 10258)

#### Standard Brands Paint Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 4627, etc.

(Decided May 15, 1962)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (Edward, N. Q-lad*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*William S. Orriok, Jr,,*Assistant Attorney General *(James F. O’Sara,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Donlon, Judge:

On call of these cases at the term of court in Los Angeles on February 2, 1962, counsel stipulated, in open court, that the merchandise covered by the entries in the appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, attached to and made a part of this decision, was entered after February 27,1958, and was not on the final list published by the Secretary of the Treasury, T.D. 54521, under section 6 (a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, T.D. 54165. The cases were then submitted on a further written stipulation of counsel for the parties, which was filed of record, as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto:

> 1. That the appeals for reappraisement set forth in Schedule “A” hereto attached and made a part hereof are limited to the merchandise shipped by Hase-gawa Shoten Go. of Japan.

> 2. That the said merchandise was appraised under Section 402(b) of the Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, 2nd Session.

> 3. That at the time of exportation to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, were the unit invoice values less the proportionate share of the inland freight, storage, hauling and lighterage, insurance premium and petty shown on the invoices to be included in the unit invoice values.

Accepting these two stipulations as an agreed statement of facts, I find and hold that export value, as defined in section 402(b) of the *663Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, supra, is the proper basis for determination of the values of the merchandise, shipped by Hasegawa Shoten Co. of Japan, described in the invoices covered by the entries in these appeals for reappraisement, and that such values of the respective items of merchandise are the unit invoice values, less the proportionate share of the inland freight, storage, hauling and lighterage, insurance premium, and petties, all as shown on the invoices which are included in the official papers filed with the court in the several suits.

As to all other merchandise, these appeals for reappraisement are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 51139.

#### Protest 41985-K of Samuel Shapiro & Co., Inc. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry. The protest was sustained to this extent.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:13-cr-284

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAVERS

KEVIN WHITELY,

Defendant.

ORDER

On October 28, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to a

Superseding Information charging him with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than

1000 kilograms of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and money laundering, in violation

of 18 U.S.C. §1956(a)(1)(B)(i). 

Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District

Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of

Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis

in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:13-cr-00284-GCS Doc #: 80 Filed: 12/01/14 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS 

Defendant’s plea of guilty to the Superseding Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 1000 kilograms of marijuana and money

laundering.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:13-cr-00284-GCS Doc #: 80 Filed: 12/01/14 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# Official Journal C 222/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 222 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 622 July 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 222

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 622 July 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2019/C 222/01 | List of competent authorities which are authorised to search directly the data contained in the second generation Schengen Information System pursuant to Article 31(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Article 46(8) of Council Decision 2007/533/JHA on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System | 1 |
| 2019/C 222/02 | List of N.SIS II Offices and the national Sirene Bureaux | 173 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2019/C 222/01

List of competent authorities which are authorised to search directly the data contained in the second generation Schengen Information System pursuant to Article 31(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Article 46(8) of Council Decision 2007/533/JHA on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System

1

2019/C 222/02

List of N.SIS II Offices and the national Sirene Bureaux

173

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-60,940] 

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on March 29, 2007, applicable to workers of U.S. Global Flag LLC, Inc., Paterson, New Jersey. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 10, 2007 (72 FR 17937).                 

At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged in the production of men's trousers and short trousers and women's trousers and short skirts and jacket linings and bedding. 

New information shows that following a corporate decision, workers separated from employment at the subject firm had their wages reported under a separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax account for Thorn, Inc., a companion company. 

Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to properly reflect this matter. 

The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of U.S. Global Flag LLC, Inc., Paterson, New Jersey who were adversely affected by increased company imports. 

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-60,940 is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of U.S. Global Flag LLC, Inc., including workers paid by Thorn, Inc., Paterson, New Jersey, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after January 31, 2006, through March 29, 2009, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of April 2007. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7-7721 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
schn-ex102_355.htm



Exhibit 10.2

 

 

SUMMARY SHEET FOR 2022 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. 

The following table sets forth the compensation for the Company’s non-employee Directors for the Board term commencing at the 2022 annual meeting of shareholders:

 


	
Annual Cash Retainer
	
Annual cash retainer for non-employee Directors of $90,000 ($105,000 for the Lead Director) paid in arrears in four equal installments on or about March 31, 2022, June 30, 2022, September 30, 2022, and December 29, 2022 (the “Installment Dates”) for the Company’s most-recently ended fiscal quarter.  

	
Annual Deferred Stock Unit Grant
	
Annual grant of Deferred Stock Units to non-employee Directors for the right to receive shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock equal to the number of shares determined by dividing $120,000 by the closing market price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on the grant date. 

	
Committee Member and Committee Chairman Fees
	
Audit Committee:  $25,000 annual fee for Chair and $10,000 annual fee for Members.  

 

Compensation Committee:  $18,000 annual fee for Chair and $7,500 annual fee for Members.  

 

Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee:  $10,000 annual fee for Chair and $5,000 annual fee for Members.  

 

Committee Member and Committee Chairman fees are paid in arrears in four equal installments on the Installment Dates.




 

All Deferred Stock Units are granted under the Company’s 1993 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of November 2013, and are subject to the terms of such plan and the applicable Deferred Stock Units award agreements approved for issuance of Deferred Stock Units to non-employee Directors under the plan.

Non-employee Directors may elect to defer all or part of their compensation under the Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, which was adopted by the Board in 2006 and amended and restated as of January 2022.
Loan Agreement and Note Payable dated March 29, 2022


 

LOAN AGREEMENT

March 29, 2022

 

Richard N. Jeffs (the “Lender”) of 11750 Fairtide Road, Ladysmith, BC V9G 1K5, advanced CAD$50,000 (the “Principal Sum”) to Cell MedX (Canada) Corp. (the “Borrower”) of 820 - 1130 Pender Street West. Vancouver, BC V6E 4A4. The Lender advanced the funds on March 29, 2022. As per request of the Borrower, the Lender transferred the Principal Sum into the account of Cell MedX Corp., the Borrower’s parent corporation with an address at 123 W. Nye Ln, Suite 446, Carson City, NV 89706.

 

The Borrower agrees to repay the Principal Sum on demand, together with interest calculated and compounded monthly at the rate of 6% per year (the “Interest”) calculated from March 29, 2022 (the “Effective Date”). The Borrower is liable for repayment of the Principal Sum, accrued Interest, and any additional costs that the Lender incurs in trying to collect the amount owed to him under the terms of this Loan Agreement.

 

The Borrower will evidence the debt and its repayment of the Principal Sum and the Interest with a promissory note in the attached form.

 

	LENDER

	BORROWER


	Richard N. Jeffs

	Cell MedX (Canada) Corp.


	 

	 


	Per:

	Per:


	 

	 


	 

	 


	/s/ Richard N. Jeffs

	/s/  Yanika Silina


	Richard N. Jeffs

	Yanika Silina, Director




 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  




 

 

PROMISSORY NOTE

 

	Principal Amount: CAD$50,000

	March 29, 2022




 

 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED Cell MedX (Canada) Corp., (the “Borrower”) promises to pay on demand to the order of Richard N. Jeffs (the “Lender”) the sum of $50,000 lawful money of Canada (the “Principal Sum”) together with the Interest accrued on the Principal Sum calculated from March 29, 2022 (“Effective Date”) both before and after maturity, default and judgment at the Interest Rate as defined below.

 

For the purposes of this promissory note, Interest Rate means 6 per cent per year. Interest at the Interest Rate must be calculated and compounded monthly not in advance from and including the Effective Date (for an effective rate of 6.2% per annum calculated monthly), and is payable together with the Principal Sum when the Principal Sum is repaid.

 

The Borrower acknowledges that, at the Borrower’s request, the Lender transferred the Principal Sum to Cell MedX Corp., the Borrower’s parent corporation.

 

The Borrower may repay the Principal Sum, and the Interest in whole or in part at any time.

 

The Borrower waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonor of this promissory note.

 

 

BORROWER

Cell MedX (Canada) Corp.

 

Per:

 

 

/s/ Yanika Silina

Yanika Silina, Director
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:12-cr-189

James E. Mills 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 25) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the information, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: October 31, 2012 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:12-cr-00189-JLG Doc #: 26 Filed: 10/31/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 56611.

protests 170867-K, etc. (Baltimore).

#### S. Schapiro & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
No. 47551.

#### Protests 814680-G, etc., of Geo. H. Maus, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Hínchelos, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 40 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 40

 Authorizing the printing and binding of a supplement to, and revised 
                     edition of, Senate Procedure.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 28, 2006

Mr. Frist (for himself, Mr. Reid, Mr. Stevens, and Mr. Byrd) introduced 
the following joint resolution; which was read twice, considered, read 
                       the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the printing and binding of a supplement to, and revised 
                     edition of, Senate Procedure.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRINTING OF SUPPLEMENT TO, AND REVISED EDITION OF, SENATE 
              PROCEDURE.

    (a) In General.--Each of the following documents shall be prepared 
under the supervision of Alan Frumin, Parliamentarian and 
Parliamentarian Emeritus of the Senate, and shall be printed and bound 
as a Senate document:
            (1) A supplement to ``Riddick's Senate Procedure'', to be 
        styled ``Frumin's Supplement to Riddick's Senate Procedure''.
            (2) A revised edition of ``Riddick's Senate Procedure'', to 
        be styled ``Frumin's Senate Procedure''.
    (b) Copies.--One thousand five hundred copies of each document 
described in subsection (a) shall be printed for distribution to 
Senators and for the use of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```