alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 64324.

protests 59/21321, etc. (Cleveland).

#### The A. W. Fenton Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Official Journal C 177A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.177.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 177A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5622 June 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.177.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 177A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5622 June 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 177A/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — fourth supplement to the 31st complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 177A/01

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — fourth supplement to the 31st complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TODHUNTER
INTERNATIONAL, INC'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       6,748,670
<SECURITIES>                                 2,547,365
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,207,027
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 23,029,953
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,605,829
<PP&E>                                      77,351,484
<DEPRECIATION>                              37,042,372
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             122,935,347
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,144,323
<BONDS>                                     51,007,297
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,129
<OTHER-SE>                                  51,259,062
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               122,935,347
<SALES>                                     20,461,823
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,461,823
<CGS>                                       13,954,744
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,954,744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,754,933
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,037,205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,714,941
<INCOME-TAX>                                   424,054
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,290,887
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,168,790
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   122,097
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

                                      CERTIFICATION

I, Melvin J. Gordon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tootsie Roll
Industries, Inc,;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the state-
ments made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial infor-
mation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such dis-
closure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

                                    Date:  Nov 11, 2004


                                    By:      /S/MELVIN J GORDON
                                           --------------------
                                           Melvin J. Gordon
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Tank Car Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark J.
Garrette, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     In witness whereof, I have executed this certification as of the 13th day
of August, 2002.




                                       /s/ Mark J. Garrette
                                       --------------------------
                                           Mark J. Garrette
                                           Principal Financial Officer

                                      -20-
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Michael
R. Mulcahy, President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Trans-Lux Corporation
(the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

    (1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

    This Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not
be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the
certifying officer.



                                       /s/ Michael R. Mulcahy
                                       -----------------------------------------
Date:  November 12, 2004               President and Co-Chief Executive Officer
                                       Michael R. Mulcahy
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Torotel, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, H. James Serrone, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/H. JAMES SERRONEH. James Serrone
Chief Financial Officer
December 12, 2002 | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,167,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,772,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   420,000
<INVENTORY>                                  9,741,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,149,000
<PP&E>                                      24,914,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,401,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,868,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,969,000
<BONDS>                                      3,200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,531,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,115,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,868,000
<SALES>                                     47,037,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,037,000
<CGS>                                       31,545,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               45,489,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               114,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             738,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,548,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   507,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,041,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,041,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 20a0140n.06
Case No. 19
- 3219
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
DONALD HOPE , Defendant

-

Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

O P I N I O N

BEFORE: COLE, Chief Judge; BOGGS and SUTTON, Circuit Judges
COLE , C hief Judge. Appellant Donald Hope pleaded guilty to conspiring to possess with intent to distribute mixtures containing heroin and cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C), 846, and 856. At sentencing, the district court imposed a sentence of 220 months ’ imprisonment

. As part of the pl ea agreement, Hope waived his right to appeal his conviction and
sentence, except as to claim s of ineffective assistance of counsel , prosecutorial misconduct , or that his sentence exceeded the statutory maximum

. Hope now avails himself of his reserved rig ht to appeal on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel. Specifically, he claims that his attorney was ineffective for not arguing that the district court was required to apply the preponderance

- of

evidence standard in making any fact

- finding that would increase Hope’s base offense level under the Sentencing Guidelines and United States v. Watts , 519 U.S. 148 (1997)

.Case No. 19

- 3219 , United States v. Hope

- 2

-

We typically do not consider claims of ineffective assistance of counsel when they are raised for the first time on direct appeal. See, e.g. , United States v. Martinez , 430 F.3d 317, 338 (6th Cir. 2005). Instead, to allow the parties to “develop an adequate record on the issue,” we normally review ineffective

- assistance claims in post

- conviction proceedings. United States v.
Brown , 332 F.3d 363, 369 (6th Cir. 2003) (internal citation and quotation marks o mitted). The rationale for this practice is that “[w]hen an ineffective

- assistance claim is brought on direct appeal, appellate counsel and the court must proceed on a trial record not developed precisely for the object of litigating or preserving the cla im and thus often incomplete or inadequate for this purpose.” Massaro v. United States , 538 U.S. 500, 50 4

– 0 5 (2003). In short, to review an ineffective

- assistance

- of

- counsel claim, we require a record from which we can comprehensively evaluate the perfor mance of the counsel in question , and s uch a record is rarely available on direct appeal

. We are not persuaded that this is one of those rare instances. On the record currently before

us , we are unable to evaluate the effectiveness of Hope’s counsel at t he sentencing hearing to determine whether his approach was constitutionally deficient . Accordingly, and without opining

on the performance of Hope’s attorney at the sentencing hearing , we decline to reach Hope’s claim at this juncture and affirm the judgment and sentence of the district court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

WILLIAM C. MARTIN, 

 

 Petitioner, 

 CASE NO. 2:12-CV-878 

v. JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH 

 MAGISTRATE JUDGE ABEL 

ERNIE MOORE, WARDEN 

LEBANON CORRECTIONAL 

INSTITUTION, 

 Respondent. 

OPINION AND ORDER 

On December 16, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation

recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254 

be dismissed. Petitioner has filed an Objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Recommendation. Doc. No. 19. Respondent has filed a Response. Doc. No. 20. For the 

reasons that follow, Petitioner’s Objection, Doc. 19, is OVERRULED. 

Petitioner objects to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation of dismissal of all of his 

claims. He contends that his claim that his convictions were against the manifest weight may 

properly be considered in these proceedings. Petitioner again argues that the evidence was 

constitutionally insufficient to sustain his convictions. He raises all of the same arguments he 

previously raised. He contends that the factual findings of the state appellate court constitute an 

unreasonable determination of the facts in view of the evidence that was presented. He argues at 

length that all of his claims warrant relief, and makes all of the same arguments he previously 

presented. Additionally, Petitioner asserts that he is actually innocent of the charges against him, 

and a victim of a manifest miscarriage of justice. See Objection. 

Case: 2:12-cv-00878-GCS-MRA Doc #: 21 Filed: 03/20/14 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this Court has conducted a de novo review. For the 

reasons already well detailed in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Petitioner’s 

Objection is not well taken. A claim regarding the manifest weight of the evidence is not 

properly addressed in these proceedings. Further, Petitioner has brought forth no new evidence 

not already available at trial indicating that he is actually innocent of the charges against him. 

Further, he has failed to rebut the presumption of correctness afforded to the factual findings of 

the state appellate court. See 28 U.S.C. 2254(e). 

Respondent requests this Court to deny Petitioner a certificate of appealability. See

Response. However, Petitioner has not requested a certificate of appealability, so the Court need 

not address that issue at this time. 

Petitioner’s Objection, Doc. No. 19, is OVERRULED. The Report and 

Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/ George C. Smith ___________ 

 GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 

Case: 2:12-cv-00878-GCS-MRA Doc #: 21 Filed: 03/20/14 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
January 6, 1941

No. 45125.

Suit 4299.

#### V. *Mueller & Co.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 220 affirmed. C. A. D. 152.
Exhibit 10.2


AnPac Bio-Medical Science Co., Ltd. 


April 6, 2022


 


Via Email


 


Dear Ms. Sheng Liu :


 


This letter shall confirm
our discussions pursuant to which you have indicated your willingness to serve as an independent director on the Board of Directors of
AnPac Bio-Medical Science Co., Ltd. (the “Company”), Chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, a member
of the and the Compensation Committee, effective as of the date hereof, until the next annual shareholders meeting or your earlier resignation
or the removal pursuant to the Company’s by-laws.


 


Our company compensates our
non-employee directors for all services they perform as a director of our company, including attendance at Board of Directors meetings
and service as members of committees of the Board of Directors to which they are appointed. The details of such compensation are:


 


	 	1.	an annual director’s fee of $18,000;


 


	 	2.	eligible to participate in the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan, and to be compensated at the same level of other independent directors’ of the Company.


 


You would also be reimbursed
for all of your out-of-pocket expenses in traveling to and attending meetings of the Board of Directors and committees on which you would
serve.


 


You may indicate your agreement
with these terms by signing and dating this letter agreement and returning it to the undersigned. By signing this letter agreement, you
reconfirm to the Company that you have no contractual commitments or other legal obligations that would prohibit you from performing your
duties for the Company.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	AnPac Bio-Medical Science Co., Ltd.
	 	 
	 	By: 	   /s/
    Jianhua Shao             
	 	 	
    Jianhua Shao

    Director



 


I have read and accept and agree to the above terms of employment:


 


	By:	/s/ Sheng Liu 	 
	 	Sheng Liu
**EXHIBIT32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Torotel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ending January 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dale H. Sizemore, Jr., ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2)       The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/  Dale  H. Sizemore, Jr. |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
|                             |
|                             |
| Dale H. Sizemore, Jr.            |
| Chief Executive Officer          |
| March 15, 2007                   |

 

----
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Douglas W. Weir, certify that: 1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Toreador Resources Corporation;  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report;  4) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport; and  c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation asof the Evaluation Date; and  d. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.   Date: August 12, 2005     /s/ Douglas W. Weir     Douglas W. Weir  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 26, 1958

No. 62031.

Suit 4911.

#### United States *v.*F. W. Myers & Co., Inc.

C. D. 1810 affirmed January 22, 1958. C. A. D. 671.