alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.14





AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO CHANGE IN TERMS AGREEMENT





THIS AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO CHANGE IN TERMS AGREEMENT


(this "Amendment"), dated as of November 23, 2021, is entered into among PACIFIC WESTERN BANK, a California state-chartered bank ("Lender"), and HANCOCK PARK CORPORATE INCOME, INC., a Maryland corporation ("Borrower"), in light of the following facts:





RECITALS





WHEREAS, Borrower and Lender previously entered into that certain Change in Terms Agreement dated as of November 15, 2021 (the "Change in Terms Agreement"); and


WHEREAS, Lender and Borrower have agreed to amend the Change in Terms Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein.





NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:





1. DEFINITIONS. All terms which are defined in the Change in Te1ms Agreement shall have the same definition when used herein unless a different definition is ascribed to such term under this Amendment, in which case, the definition contained herein shall govern.





2. AMENDMENT TO CHANGE IN TERMS AGREEMENT. The Change in Terms Agreement is hereby amended as follows:





(a) The second sentence under the heading "Payment" is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:





"In addition, Borrower will pay regular monthly payments of all accrued unpaid interest due as of each payment date, beginning November 30, 2021, with all subsequent interest payments to be due on the same day of each month after that."





3. LIMITED EFFECT. Except for the specific amendment contained in this Amendment, the Change in Terms Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.





4. COUNTERPARTS: EFFECTIVENESS. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties on separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original. All such counterparts, taken together, shall constitute but one and the same Amendment. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this Amendment by facsimile or in electronic (i.e., "pdf' or "tif') format shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Amendment. This Amendment shall become effective upon the execution of this Amendment by each of the parties hereto.








[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK; SIGNATURE PAGES FOLLOWS]







---







IN WITNESS WHEREOF , Borrower and Lender have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.








HANCOCK PARK CORPORATE INCOME,


INC., a Maryland corporation , as Borrower





By:/s/ Jeffrey A. CernyJeffrey A. Cerny, CFOPACIFIC WESTERN BANKBy:/s/ Todd SavitzTodd Savitz, Senior Vice President
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 325 

To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Senate Election Law 

Guidebook. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2005 

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed 

to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Senate 

Election Law Guidebook. 

1 Resolved, That the Committee on Rules and Adminis2 tration shall prepare a revised edition of the Senate Elec3 tion Law Guidebook, Senate Document 106-14 , and that 

4 such document shall be printed as a Senate document. 

5 SEC. 2. There shall be printed, beyond the usual 

6 number, 500 additional copies of the document specified 

7 in the first section for the use of the Committee on Rules 

8 and Administration. 

Æ
# Official Journal C 306/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 306 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6315 September 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 306

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6315 September 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 194/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species supplement 2020/8 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2020/C 194/02 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species supplement 2020/8 (
  1
  ) | 29 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 194/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species supplement 2020/8 (
  1
  )

1

1

2020/C 194/02

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species supplement 2020/8 (
  1
  )

1

29

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Regency
Affiliates, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Laurence S. Levy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as
      of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the
      Company for the periods presented.

Dated: October 4, 2007


/s/ Laurence S. Levy
-------------------------------------
Laurence S. Levy
President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trinity Capital Corporation, a New Mexico corporation (“Trinity”), for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Daniel R. Bartholomew, as Chief Financial Officer of Trinity, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Trinity. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /s/ Daniel R. Bartholomew |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Daniel R. Bartholomew     |
| Chief Financial Officer   |
| May 11, 2009              |
UNISOURCE ENERGY CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                                        Three Months Ended
                                                             March 31,
                                                         2001        2000
                                                        ------      ------
                                                     - Thousands of Dollars -
                                                     (except per share data)

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:

 Net Income Before Cumulative
  Effect of Accounting Change                         $ 18,795     $   242

 Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change                    470           -
                                                     ---------    --------
 Net Income                                           $ 19,265     $   242

 Average Shares of Common Stock Outstanding             33,266      32,374
                                                     ---------    --------

Basic Earnings Per Share Before Cumulative
 Effect of Accounting Change                          $   0.57     $  0.01

Basic Earnings Per Share From Cumulative
 Effect of Accounting Change                              0.01           -
                                                     ---------    --------
Basic Earnings Per Share                              $   0.58     $  0.01
                                                     =========    ========

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:

 Net Income Before Cumulative
  Effect of Accounting Change                         $ 18,795     $   242

 Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change                    470           -
                                                     ---------    --------
 Net Income                                           $ 19,265     $   242

 Average Shares of Common Stock Outstanding             33,266      32,374
 Effect of Dilutive Securities:
  Warrants                                                 131           -
  Options and Stock Issuable under Employee Benefit
   Plans                                                   646         383
                                                      ---------    --------
 Total Shares                                           34,043      32,757
                                                      ---------    --------
Diluted Earnings Per Share Before Cumulative
  Effect of Accounting Change                         $   0.56     $  0.01

Diluted Earnings Per Share From Cumulative
     Effect of Accounting Change                          0.01           -
                                                     ---------    --------
Diluted Earnings Per Share                            $   0.57     $  0.01
                                                     =========    ========
     At March 31, 2001, UniSource Energy had no outstanding warrants. There
were 4.6 million of TEP warrants outstanding that were exercisable into TEP
common stock. However, the dilutive effect is the same as it would be if the
warrants were exercisable into UniSource Energy Common Stock.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 279 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 279

   To authorize testimony in State of Mississippi v. Edward Statecum.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 18, 2005

     Mr. Frist (for himself and Mr. Reid) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To authorize testimony in State of Mississippi v. Edward Statecum.

Whereas, in the case of State of Mississippi v. Edward Statecum, Case No. 
        M051648, pending in Municipal Court in the City of Clarksdale, 
        Mississippi, testimony has been requested from Kim Coalter, an employee 
        in the office of Senator Thad Cochran;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Kim Coalter is authorized to testify in the case of 
State of Mississippi v. Edward Statecum, except concerning matters for 
which a privilege should be asserted.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1
                             TRANS-INDUSTRIES, INC.


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trans-Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dale
S. Coenen, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kai Kosanke, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes--Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:


(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




/s/ Dale S. Coenen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name: Dale S. Coenen
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 17, 2003


/s/ Kai Kosanke
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name: Kai Kosanke
Title: Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 17, 2003



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Paragraph 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

See also the certification pursuant to Sec. 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, which is also attached to this Report.



                                       24
No. 56136.

protest 172281-K (Ogdensburg).

#### A. N. Deringer, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protest was dismissed.
# C_2007272EN.01S00301.xml

| 15.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/s3

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

On 15 November 2007, in Official Journal of the European Union C 272 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Seventh supplement to the 25th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see: http://publications.europa.eu/others/sales_agents_en.html).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

Image

---
DENIED and Opinion Filed June 16, 2023 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-23-00598-CV 

IN RE CONNIE DENISE SIGEL IN HER CAPACITY AS INDEPENDENT 

EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF FLO DELMARENE MCCARTHY, 

DECEASED, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the Probate Court No. 1 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. PR-18-00439-1 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Reichek, Carlyle, and Kennedy 

Opinion by Justice Kennedy 

In her June 14, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator seeks relief from 

two probate court orders issued in connection with an independent estate 

administration. The first order set aside an earlier distribution order. The second 

order is a pretrial scheduling order, setting certain issues for a jury trial. 

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court 

clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In 

re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. 

proceeding). Relator bears the burden of providing the Court with a sufficient record 

to show she is entitled to relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) 
 –2– 

(orig. proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, we 

conclude that relator has failed to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.8(a). 

We also deny relator’s emergency motion to stay as moot. 

230598F.P05 

/Nancy Kennedy/

NANCY KENNEDY 

JUSTICE
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

ReferenceisherebymadetothatcertainPooling and Servicing Agreementdatedas of February 1, 2016, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGESECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asMaster Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGOBANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asCertificate Administrator, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and as AssetRepresentations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates Series 2016-NXS5 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized termsused herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of thisAgreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that:

 

1.A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performanceper the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision,and

 

2.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the ReportingPeriod.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary2018.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
# C_2007170EN.01003902.xml

| 21.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/39

---

Action brought on 5 June 2007 — Cementownia ‘Odra’ v Commission

(Case T-199/07)

(2007/C 170/75)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Cementownia ‘Odra’ SA (represented by: P.K. Rosiak, legal adviser, and F. Puel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the Commission's decision of 26 March 2007 concerning the national allocation plan for greenhouse gas emission allowances notified by Poland in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission's decision of 26 March 2007 concerning the national allocation plan for greenhouse gas emission allowances notified by Poland in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2007) 1295 final of 26 March 2007 concerning the national allocation plan for greenhouse gas emission allowances notified by Poland in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1), in which the Commission decided that certain aspects of the Polish National Allocation Plan for CO2 Emission Allowances for 2008-2012, notified to the Commission on 30 June 2006, were not compatible with Articles 9(1) and (3), 10 and 13(2) of and the criteria set out in Annex III to Directive 2003/87/EC. The decision in question reduces the carbon dioxide emission limit in 2008-2012 by 26.7 % compared to the limit proposed by Poland in the national allocation plan for emission allowances notified to the Commission.

1

2

The pleas in law and main arguments put forward by the applicant are the same as those of the applicant in Case T-195/07.

---

(1)  Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32).

1

---
"

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. AF 07-0157

PILED

'Ed Smitfi

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF MONTANA

IN THE MATTER OF A CORRECTION TO

RULE 45 OF THE MONTANA RULES OF

CIVIL PROCEDURE

)

)

)

ORDER JUL 31 2012

An error has been brought to the Court's attention in M. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(2), as

adopted effective October 1, 2011.

IT IS ORDERED that M. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(2) is modified as shown below.

Highlighted language is added to the rule; language stricken through is deleted from the rule:

Issuedfrom Wlzich Court. I\. subpoena must

(I\.) for attendance at a hearing or trial, from the court for the district where the

hearing or trial is to be held;

(B) for attendance at a deposition, from the court for the district where the

deposition is to be taken; and

(C) for the production or inspection, ifseparate from a subpoena commanding

a person's attendance, from the court for the district \-"here the production or

inspection is to be made.

The above changes to M. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(2), which reflect the longstanding practice in cases

filed in Montana district courts, shall take effect immediately.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to each Clerk ofthe District Court

in the State ofMontana; each District Judge for the State ofMontana; Todd Everts and Kevin

Hayes at the Montana Legislative Services Division; the Montana Attorney General; the

Director ofthe Montana Trial Lawyers; the Director ofthe Montana Defense Trial Lawyers;

July 31 2012
2
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3544 — Bayer Healthcare/Roche (OTC Business))

(2005/C 7/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 19 November 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
No. 76-5301.

#### Silver *v.*Larson Ford Sales, Inc.

Appeal from Sup. Ct. Utah dismissed for want of substantial federal question.