alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Action brought on 17 September 2004 by Polyelectrolyte Producers Group against the Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-376/04)

(2004/C 284/51)

Language of the case: English

An action against the Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 17 September 2004 by Polyelectrolyte Producers Group, Brussels (Belgium) represented by K. Van Maldegem and C. Mereu, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

In support of its application the applicant submits that, in the absence of new Community legislation there was no power under Article 102 EEA Agreement to adopt the contested measures. The applicant further considers that the contested measures restrict the free movement of goods and thus infringe Articles 1, 3 and 97 of the EEA Agreement. It also claims that they infringe Articles 30 and 31 of Directive 67/548 (3). The applicant also invokes infringements of general principles of Community law, namely the principles of legal certainty and legitimate expectations, proportionality and of non-discrimination as well as of essential procedural requirements, namely the need to consult the European Parliament and the duty to state reasons.

Regarding its action for damages the applicant submits that because of the contested measures it has suffered both material damage, due to the need to label the polyarcylamide sold in Norway with a more restrictive label and danger warnings incurring additional costs, as well as non-material damage since, in the applicant's opinion, the Norwegian measures allowed by the defendant shed a bad light over the classification of polyarcylamide beyond Norwegian boundaries.

----

(1)  OJ L 277, p. 30.

(2)  OJ C185, p. 6.

(3)  Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances OJ English special edition: Series I Chapter 1967 p. 234.

----
EXHIBIT
32



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906



Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned officer of
ASN Satellites Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:



The
Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly represents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date:
March 31, 2017 | By: | /s/
    Jean Yves Armand Gicquel                                                
|-------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |     | Jean
    Yves Armand Gicquel
    Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
2012 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d

S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s

for the Thir d C ir c uit

10-16-2012



# M e r r i l l L y nch P ie r ce F e nne r S m v

. C he r y l

S ch w a r z w a elde r

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al

D ock e t N o . 11-2605

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2012

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a

U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2012 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a

U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du

. R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" M e r r i l l L y nch P ie r c e F e nne r S m v

. C he r y l S ch w a r zw a e lde r " (2012). 2012 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 282.

h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2012/282

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

October 4 , 2012

No. 11

- 2605

MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED,

Appellant

v.

CHERYL SCHWARZWAELDER

( W.D. Pa. Nos. 2

- 11

- cv

- 00107 and No. 2

- 11

- cv

- 00162)

Present: SLOVITER and VAN ASKIE

, Circuit Judge s

1. Appellee’s Petition for Reconstitution of Panel or, Alternatively, for Rehearing

by the Panel.

2. Appellant’s Answer to the Petition for Rehearing

Respectfully,

Clerk

____________________ __ ___________ ORDER

__________ _____________________ The foregoing petition for panel rehearing and reconstitution of the panel is granted. Oral

argument will be scheduled at the convenience of the panel

.

By the Court,

s/ Thomas I. Vanaskie

Circuit Ju dge

Dated: October 16, 2012

T nh/ cc: Joseph H. Chivers, III, Esq.

Patricia A. Tsipras, Esq.

Lauren D. Rushak, Esq.

Michael J. Fortunato, Esq.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 13 (Monday, January 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-777]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies; Correction

    This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. E6-22532) published on page 
334 of the issue for Thursday, January 4, 2007.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis heading, the entry for 
Enterprise Financial Services Corp., Clayton, Missouri, is revised to 
read as follows:
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community 
Affairs Officer) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Enterprise Financial Services Corp. Clayton, Missouri; to 
acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Clayco Banc Corporation, De 
Soto, Kansas, and thereby indirectly acquire Great American Bank, 
DeSoto, Kansas.
    Comments on this application must be received by January 26, 2007.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 16, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-777 Filed 1-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
JOHNNY LEE HILL

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 3583

Opinion filed October 16, 2017.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

-- Original

Jurisdiction

.

Johnny Lee Hill, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is dismissed as

untimely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(5).

LEWIS, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                     39,850
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                             583,005
<ALLOWANCES>                               18,335
<INVENTORY>                               492,691
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,150,871
<PP&E>                                  7,034,244
<DEPRECIATION>                          3,279,511
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          5,123,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     830,938
<BONDS>                                 1,252,223
<COMMON>                                   69,345
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                              1,981,382
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            5,123,752
<SALES>                                 2,162,716
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        2,162,716
<CGS>                                   1,656,673
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           2,064,083
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (1,535)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         59,023
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            41,145
<INCOME-TAX>                               15,223
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        20,229 <F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               20,229
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.29
<FN>
<F1>REFLECTS ADJUSTMENT FOR MINORITY INTEREST (NET OF TAX) OF $5,693
</FN>
        




</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of
January 13, 2016 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2016-1 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and
the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the
same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 13, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |                                         |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |  |                                         |  | 
|                                     |  |                                         | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  |  |  | Dated: March 15, 2017
|                                     |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |  |  |
EX-10.1




 Exhibit 10.1 

Twitter, Inc. 
 1355
Market Street 
 San Francisco, CA 94103 

April 4, 2022 
 Elon R. Musk 

2110 Ranch Road 620 S. #341886 
 Austin, TX 78734 

Dear Mr. Musk: 
 Twitter, Inc. (the
“Company”) and Elon Musk hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Appointment of Mr. Musk as a Director. As promptly as
practicable following the execution of this letter agreement, subject to and contingent upon the provision by Mr. Musk of any information that the Company reasonably requires to complete its customary onboarding procedures (including a
customary background check and completion of the Company’s D&O questionnaire) for members of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”), the Company and the Board will take all action necessary so that as
Mr. Musk will be appointed to the Board as a Class II director with a term expiring at the Company’s 2024 annual meeting of stockholders. 

2. Company Securities. Mr. Musk agrees that, for so long as Mr. Musk is serving on the Board and for 90 days thereafter, Mr. Musk will
not, either alone or as a member of a group, become the beneficial owner of more than 14.9% of Company’s common stock outstanding at such time, including for these purposes economic exposure through derivative securities, swaps or hedging
transactions. 
 3. Miscellaneous. The terms “group” and “beneficial owner” are as defined in Section 13(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and related rules. The parties agree that specific performance will be available to the parties under this letter agreement. This letter agreement is governed by, and will be construed in accordance with, the laws of the State
of Delaware. 
  

	
	ELON R. MUSK
	
	/s/ Elon
Musk                                         
           
	
	TWITTER, INC.
	
	By: /s/ Parag
Agrawal                                        

	Name: Parag Agrawal
	Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### Chas. Hall, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6714.

Entry No. 724782, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, March 1943, etc.

Certified March 1943, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., April 21, 1943, etc.

(Decided January 7, 1947)

*James W. Bevans*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# Official Journal L 83/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.083.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 83 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5622 March 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.083.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 83

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5622 March 2013

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 231/2013 of 19 December 2012 supplementing Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to exemptions, general operating conditions, depositaries, leverage, transparency and supervision (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 231/2013 of 19 December 2012 supplementing Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to exemptions, general operating conditions, depositaries, leverage, transparency and supervision (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Before the Third Division,

June 6, 1945

No. 50237.

#### Protests 69719-K, etc., of Castle Gate Hosiery & Glove Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
# Official Journal C 185/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.185.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 185 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5523 June 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.185.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 185

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5523 June 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 185/01 | Commission communication pursuant to Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws, concerning the competent authorities and single liaison offices (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 185/01

Commission communication pursuant to Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws, concerning the competent authorities and single liaison offices (1)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN OHIO DISTRICT

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. CR-2-13-262

 JUDGE GREGORY FROST

RICHARD M. SPRIGGS, JR.,

Defendant.

ORDER REVOKING SUPERVISED RELEASE AND IMPOSING SENTENCE

This matter came on for a hearing this 15th day of December, 2015 upon the Petition to

Revoke the Defendant’s Supervised Release Status and the Supplemental Report. Defendant,

Counsel for Defendant, and Counsel for the Government appeared.

At the hearing, Defendant admitted to violating:

Special Condition No. 1: “The defendant shall participate in home detention component

of location monitoring program for a period of three (3) months. The defendant

shall remain in his residence unless he is given permission in advance by the U.S.

Probation Office for approved activities. The defendant shall abide by all

requirements established by the U.S. Probation office related to the use of

location monitoring technology. The defendant shall pay part or all of the cost of

the location monitoring based upon his ability to pay as determined by the U.S.

Probation Office.”

Standard Condition No. 7: “The defendant shall refrain from excessive use of alcohol and

1

Case: 2:13-cr-00262-GLF Doc #: 53 Filed: 12/15/15 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
shall not purchase, possess, use, distribute, or administer any narcotic or other controlled

substance, or any paraphernalia related to such substances, except as prescribed by a

physician.”

The Court accepted the admissions.

The Court thereafter proceeded with sentencing. Pursuant to the United States

Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G.) 7B1.1(a)(2), Defendant has been found guilty of violating one

Special Condition and one Standard Condition of Supervised Release which conduct represents

Grade C violations. Based on Grade C violations and criminal history category I, the advisory

guideline imprisonment range for revocation purposes is 3 to 9 months. See U.S.S.G. 7B1.4(a).

Relying upon the foregoing, the facts of this case, and the 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) factors, the

Court modifies Defendant’s conditions of Supervised Release as follows:

1. Defendant shall remain on electronic monitoring for a period of ninety (90) days; and

2. Defendant shall make arrangements for paying and shall pay for the damages to the

location monitoring equipment in the amount of $1320.00.

All other terms and conditions of Supervised Release shall remain in effect.

After sentencing, the Defendant acknowledged his rights on appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/ Gregory L. Frost 

GREGORY L. FROST, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

Case: 2:13-cr-00262-GLF Doc #: 53 Filed: 12/15/15 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 58181.

protest 148795-K (Providence).

#### Atlas Converting Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, the record in *Atlas Converting Co.*v. *United States*(26 Cust. Ct. 198, C. D. 1324), involving nylon yarn wound upon both cones and spools, was incorporated herein. In the incorporated case, the court found nothing in the evidence submitted tending to controvert the correctness of the return of net weight of the nylon yarn, and the presumption of correctness of the collector’s action not having been overcome, the court was constrained to overrule the protests therein. In the pending case, it was held that there was no evidence introduced to establish that the invoice tare correctly represented the actual tare, rather than the tare returned by the Government weighers, whose weight returns stand presumptively correct, unless overcome by evidence presented before the court. In view of the lack of evidence in the incorporated case as well as in the case at bar, the protest was overruled.
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John
C. Lawrence, President, and Chief Executive Officer of United States Antimony
Corporation (the “Company”) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:





This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“report”),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











By: //s/ John
      C. Lawrence
                John
      C. Lawrence
                  President
      and Chief Executive Officer
              Date: November
      13, 2009