alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA piloted simulation of helicopter air combat to investigate effects of variations in selected performance and control response characteristicsA piloted simulation study investigating handling qualities and flight characteristics required for helicopter air to air combat is presented. The Helicopter Air Combat system was used to investigate this role for Army rotorcraft. Experimental variables were the maneuver envelope size (load factor and sideslip), directional axis handling qualities, and pitch and roll control-response type. Over 450 simulated, low altitude, one-on-one engagements were conducted. Results from the experiment indicate that a well damped directional response, low sideforce caused by sideslip, and some effective dihedral are all desirable for weapon system performance, good handling qualities, and low pilot workload. An angular rate command system was favored over the attitude type pitch and roll response for most applications, and an enhanced maneuver envelope size over that of current generation aircraft was found to be advantageous. Pilot technique, background, and experience are additional factors which had a significant effect on performance in the air combat tasks investigated. The implication of these results on design requirements for future helicopters is presented.Document ID19870020108Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsLewis, Michael S.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Mansur, M. Hossein*(Army Aviation Research and Development Command Moffett Field, Calif., United States)*Chen, Robert T. N.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1987Subject CategoryAircraft Stability And ControlReport/Patent NumberUSAAVSCOM-TM-87-A-3NASA-TM-89438A-87147NAS 1.15:89438Accession Number87N29541Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-61-51Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870020108.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 78 (Tuesday, April 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7808]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Reporting Requirements Submitted for OMB Review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit proposed reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to 
publish a notice in the Federal Register notifying the public that the 
agency has made such a submission.

DATES: Submit comments on or before May 24, 2007. If you intend to 
comment but cannot prepare comments promptly, please advise the OMB 
Reviewer and the Agency Clearance Officer before the deadline.
    Copies: Request for clearance (OMB 83-1), supporting statement, and 
other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the 
Agency Clearance Officer.

ADDRESSES: Address all comments concerning this notice to: Agency 
Clearance Officer, Jacqueline White, Small Business Administration, 409 
3rd Street, SW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20416; and OMB Reviewer, 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and 
Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline White, Agency Clearance 
Officer, (202) 205-7044.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Disaster Business Loan Application.
    No's: 5,1368.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Description of Respondents: Personnel that assist in the processing 
of loan applications and disbursement of loan funds to victims of 
hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma.
    Responses: 19,769.
    Annual Burden: 46,113.
    Title: 8(a) SDB Paper and Electronic Application.
    No's: 1010, 1010B, 1010C, 2065.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Description of Respondents: 8(a) SDB Companies.
    Responses: 8,400.
    Annual Burden: 36,210.

Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
 [FR Doc. E7-7808 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 13 (Monday, January 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-788]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER02-1656-000, ER06-615-000]


California Independent System Operator Corporation; Notice of 
FERC Staff Attendance

January 12, 2007.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives 
notice that on the following dates members of its staff will attend 
stakeholder meetings of the California Independent System Operator 
(CAISO). These meetings will be held at the CAISO, 151 Blue Ravine 
Road, Folsom, CA or by teleconference. The agenda and other documents 
for the meetings are available on the CAISO's Web site, http://www.caiso.com.

January 16, 2007
    Long-Term Transmission Rights.
January 17, 2007
    Systems Interface Users Group.
January 18, 2007
    Transmission Maintenance Coordination Committee.
January 18, 2007
    MRTU Market Simulation Phase 2.

    Sponsored by the CAISO, these meetings are open to all market 
participants, and staff's attendance is part of the Commission's 
ongoing outreach efforts. The meetings may discuss matters at issue in 
the above captioned dockets.
    For Further Information Contact: Katherine Gensler at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c0aba1b4a8a5b2a9aea5eea7a5aeb3aca5b280a6a5b2a3eea7afb6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c171d0814190e151219521b19120f10190e3c1a190e1f521b130a">[email protected]</span></a>; (916) 294-0275.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-788 Filed 1-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 45154.

#### Protest 845926-G of Great Western Mercantile Co. (Los Angeles).

*500Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Penn*(27 C. C. P. A. 242, C. A. D. 93) the claim at 90 percent under paragraph 1529 (a) was sustained.
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors, PNCFinancial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services,a division of PNC Bank, National Association (“Midland” or the“Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for alltransactions serviced on the *Enterprise!* Loan Management System (the“Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C),1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv),which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activitiesperformed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for theCompany's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedasset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing ofselected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that Midland complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 17, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816)218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*

* *
Before the Second Division,

January 30, 1942

No. 46906.

#### Protest 29661-K of Simon Healey *&*Goldstein, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is similar to that involved in Abstract 46059. The claim that this item is dutiable at 65 percent under paragraph 1529 and T. D. 48316 was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 13 (Monday, January 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-776]



[[Page 2648]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Meeting of the Land Between The Lakes Advisory Board

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Land Between The Lakes Advisory Board will hold a meeting 
on Thursday, February 8, 2007. Notice of this meeting is given under 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app.2.
    The meeting agenda includes the following:

(1) Welcome/Introductions
(2) Background from Previous Meeting
(3) Discussions on Prioritizing Strategies for Environmental Education
(4) Discussion on Potential Environmental Education Action Items
(5) FS Feedback on Proposed Strategic Plan for Environmental Education
(6) Board Discussion on Public Comments Received
(7) LBL Updates

    The meeting is open to the public. Written comments are invited and 
may be mailed to: William P. Lisowsky, Area Supervisor, Land Between 
The Lakes, 100 Van Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, Kentucky 42211. Written 
comments must be received at Land Between The Lakes by February 1, 
2007, in order for copies to be provided to the members at the meeting. 
Board members will review written comments received, and at their 
request, oral clarification may be requested at a future meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on February 8, 2007, 9 a.m. to 3:15 
p.m., CST.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Land Between The Lakes 
Administrative Building, Golden Pond, Kentucky, and will be open to the 
public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon Byers, Advisory Board Liaison, 
Land Between The Lakes, 100 Van Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, Kentucky 
42211, 270-924-2002.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

    Dated: January 16, 2007.
William P. Lisowsky,
Area Supervisor, Land Between The Lakes.
 [FR Doc. E7-776 Filed 1-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
No. 51174.

#### Protests 52215-K, etc., of John Minervini et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decisions cited the following allowances were made to compensate for the weight of the inedible substance on the outside of the cheese: (1) 2percent for the cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), Abstract 42146, and Abstract 48269; and (2) 1 percent for the cheese similar to the Reggiano cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States, supra.*The protests were sustained to this extent.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 13 (Monday, January 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-780]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Change in Meeting

January 17, 2007.
    Upon the affirmative vote of Chairman Kelliher and Commissioners 
Kelly, Spitzer, Moeller and Wellinghoff the following Docket Nos. and 
Companies are hereby added as Item M-3 on the Commission's open meeting 
scheduled for January 18, 2007.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Item No.                      Docket No. and company
------------------------------------------------------------------------
M-3...............................  IN07-1-000, NorthWestern Corporation
                                    IN07-3-000, SCANA Corporation
                                    IN07-4-000, Entergy Services, Inc.
                                    IN07-5-000, PacifiCorp
                                    IN07-6-000, NRG Energy, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-780 Filed 1-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Slip Op. 99-30

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

UMA IRON & STEEL CO., ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant.

BEFORE: DiCarlo, 

Senior Judge

Consol. Ct. 

No. 91-11-00825

JUDGMENT ORDER

The United States Department of Commerce submitted its Results of Redetermination in

accordance with this Court’s Remand order of May 13, 1994, in the case of Uma Iron and Steel

Co., et al. v. United States, Consolidated Court No. 91-11-00825. The Department of Commerce

requested this remand pursuant to the remand from the Court in Creswell Trading Company, Inc.,

et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 91-01-00012, Slip Op. 98-87. In its Redetermination of

the 1988 administrative review, Commerce recalculated the company-specific subsidy rates by

revising the rates relating to India’s International Price Reimbursement Scheme (IPRS). The

rates, however, did not change. Accordingly, the rates applicable to the 1988 period of review

are as follows:

Uma Iron & Steel Co. 10.03%

Govind Steel 14.08%

All Others 4.10%

These rates have been stipulated to and accepted by all parties to this action.
Consol. Ct. No. 91-11-00825 Page 2

The Court having reviewed the Redetermination Results, Commerce having complied

with the Court’s Remand, and the parties having stipulated to the rates, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the Redetermination Results are affirmed; and it is further

ORDERED that the rates listed above shall be the rates for the 1988 period, and it is

further

ORDERED that, as the parties have stipulated that they will not litigate any other issues,

this action is dismissed.

___________________________

Dominick L. DiCarlo

Senior Judge

Dated: New York, New York

April 1, 1999
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6246

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTWAN WELLS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CR-94-677, CA-96-2977-4-21BE) Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 23, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Antwan Wells, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wells , Nos. CR-94-677; CA-96-2977-4-21BE (D.S.C. Jan. 26, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 141 (Wednesday, July 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 42791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17277]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

Intent To Conduct a Detailed Economic Impact Analysis

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In conformity with the provisions of Section 2(e)(7)(B) of the 
Ex-Im Bank Charter, this notice is to inform the public that the 
Export-Import Bank of the United States has received an application for 
a loan guarantee to support the export of U.S.-manufactured Boeing 777 
and Boeing 737 passenger aircraft that will be operated by an airline 
in China. The specific amount of the loan guarantee, the value of the 
transaction, and the amount of new foreign production capacity are not 
included here because they are proprietary information. However, the 
total value of the transaction is in excess of $200 million and, based 
on currently available information, the amount of increased wide-body 
seat capacity resulting from these aircraft will be 1% or more of 
comparable wide-body seat capacity within the U.S. airline industry. 
The aircraft in this transaction will enable passenger route service 
within China and from China to various regional and international 
destinations, potentially including the United States.

DATES: Comments are due August 6, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Comments can be sent electronically to 
economic.impact@exim.gov or by mail to 811 Vermont Avenue, Washington, 
DC 20571, attention Policy and Planning Division.

James C. Cruse,
Senior Vice President, Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. 2014-17277 Filed 7-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
Case: 2:12-cv-01131-EAS-TPK Doc #: 41 Filed: 05/20/15 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-01131-EAS-TPK Doc #: 41 Filed: 05/20/15 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
December 15, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

QUINCY LEE JOHNSON, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00018-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 15







August 19, 2004

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated May 3, 2004, except as to the restatement of
unbilled revenue described in Note 18 to the condensed consolidated interim
financial statements which is as of August 19, 2004, on our reviews of interim
financial information of UniSource Energy Corporation (the Company) and Tucson
Electric Power Company (TEP) as of and for the period ended March 31, 2004 and
included in the Company's and TEP's quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the
quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in the Company's Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-43765, 333-43767, 333-43769, 333-53309,
333-53333, 333-53337 and 333-99317), on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-31043, 333-93769 and
333-103392) and in TEP's Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form
S-4 (No. 333-65143).


Very truly yours,



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
390000m.f
!

BATHYMETRIC MAP

970 i

POINT LAY WEST

4goo0om.,

CHUKCHI SEA

Nv
fo)

7760000m.N,

7760000m..Y,

V2

a
"|
f°

DAN

4
I

oS

nN
©
°

w
B

Wa

NO 5

Ny

\

a
©

POINT LAY NR 3.6

PS

O
is

—_

WES

mt

V

Tago00on N,

76G0000m.\y

SDS

1036

3goo00ng. 1

Base map information including bathymetry was compiled by the National
Ocean Service (NOS). Bathymetry was compiled from NOS hydrographic
surveys supplemented by hydrographic information from other sources
(see index). NOS hydrographic survey data complies with International
Hydrographic Organization (IHO) Special Publication 44 accuracy
standards or those used at the date of the survey. This is a reproduction
of a facsimile of the bathymetric manuscript and does not necessarily
represent the final publication. This information is not intended for navi-
gational purposes.

Bathymetric Contour Interval: 10 meters to maximum depth, supplemented
by 2 meter intervals.

Datum: Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW).

Universal Transverse Mercator Grid. Zone 3; 10,000 meter ticks (---) are
shown inside the neatline.

Protraction Diagram data shown in a subdued (screened) block was com-
piled by the Minerals Management Service (MMS).

THIS MAP IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal leasing purposes; for
such purposes use the MMS Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction
Diagrams.

Heavy line(s} indicate limits of these protraction

diagrams.
HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMATION

survey
survey survey suevey Line SPACING
NUMBER OnE SE (war. stves)
8685 1982 1100000 0317
rse62 1361 1:160,000 ote
rsees 1982 15100,000 Sots
8098 1362 15100,000 gona

OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MAP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE

1986

Produced at Washington, D.C.
for

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE

TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION
Scale 1:250,000
10

15 20 Statute Miles
— =
5 i?) 5 10 15 20 25 30 Kilometers
——— =
oO 5 10 15 Nautical Miles
— 1

NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE
HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY INDEX

woiset 165°
y FOP
1 He
H-8665 oe
H-8655 Supplementary
Data
{—H-8662
69° j69°
i6e° 165°

Photographic copies of the above and prior surveys
may be obtained, at the cost of reproduction, by
addressing the ‘Director (N/CG243), National
Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, Rockville, Maryland 20852,

‘4go000m.E,

POINT LAY WEST
NOS NR 3-5 (OCS)

INDEX TO
ADJOINING SHEETS 62
7°

aye
nm
SLND
we | REST | a
pot tay | point Lav
west | "Na's's
PowntT
oH S oF, LNG
NR 3? NR 3-8
6s? 68
171° 162

{
|

|

}
|
I

2

7 Assy he

@ fey

Me

(

(BLE

%,
No. 40338.

#### Protests 894519-G, etc., of Hain Pure Food Co. et al. (Los Angeles, etc.).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.