alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered October 17, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01404-CV

IN RE RONALD NEWTON, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-11818

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of today’s date, we DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus in part and DENY it in part. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original 

proceeding.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
# Official Journal C 105A/20 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 105A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6120 March 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 105A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6120 March 2018

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 105 A/01 | DG Education, Youth, Sport and Culture (DG EAC) — Vacancy notice for a Principal Adviser function (AD 14) — Brussels (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2018/10377 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2018/C 105 A/01

DG Education, Youth, Sport and Culture (DG EAC) — Vacancy notice for a Principal Adviser function (AD 14) — Brussels (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2018/10377

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,205,382
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,707,723
<ALLOWANCES>                                   271,127
<INVENTORY>                                 12,831,534
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,920,386
<PP&E>                                      22,049,344
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,105,194
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,414,469
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,353,194
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,129,767
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,931,508
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                49,414,469
<SALES>                                     61,141,510
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            61,141,510
<CGS>                                       26,914,037
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,783,384
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (287,255)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,731,344
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,056,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,675,344
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,675,344
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
        


</TABLE>
DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts

Chambers Works

Deepwater, NJ 08023

November 1, 2012

Director, Chemical Control Division

US Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

EPA East

Room 4146

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20004

Re: EPA – HQ – OPPT – 2003 - 0012

DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100

PFOA Data Submittal – Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples

August and September 2012 Sample Data

Dear Chemical Control Division:

Attached please find a summary of PFOA analytical results for the DuPont Chambers Works 

weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662A in August and September 2012. In 

accordance with the current site NJPDES permit (NJ0005100, effective September 2011), these 

results are provided to NJDEP on a monthly basis via electronic discharge monitoring reports. 

Per your request, the enclosures include two paper and two electronic copies of the analytical 

results from this monitoring period.

Sincerely, 

Jacques Monteux

Unit Manager-Site Manufacturing Systems 

DuPont Chambers Works

JM/clc

Enclosures
Copy to:

Document Control Office

US Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

EPA East

Room 6428

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20460

Ms. Susan Rosenwinkel (cover letter only)

Principal Environmental Engineer

NJDEP Division of Water Quality

Bureau of Point Source Permitting – Region 2

401 E. State Street

P.O. Box 029

Trenton, NJ 08625-0029
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 DECEMBER 30, 2010

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-16376

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 09-00024-CR-A-N

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHN ALBERT FLORES,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Alabama

_________________________

(December 30, 2010)

Before TJOFLAT, HILL and ALARCON, Circuit Judges.

*

PER CURIAM:

 Honorable Arthur L. Alarcon, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting *

by designation.
Appellant John Albert Flores (“Flores”) entered a conditional plea of guilty

to one count of knowing and willfully possessing with intent to distribute five

kilograms or more of a controlled substance, in this case cocaine hydrochloride, a

Schedule II Controlled Substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant

to the plea agreement, Flores reserved the right to appeal the district court’s denial

of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search of his tractor trailer

performed after a routine traffic stop. He now appeals the denial of his motion to

suppress.

Flores filed his motion to suppress on March 17, 2009. The matter was

referred to a magistrate judge, and, on April 7, 2009, an evidentiary hearing was

held. Following that hearing, on May 14, 2009, the magistrate judge issued a

Report and Recommendation recommending that the motion to suppress be denied.

Flores objected to that Report and Recommendation on May 28, 2009. The district

court conducted a de novo review of the evidence and adopted the magistrate

judge’s Report and Recommendation.

Our review of the record of the suppression hearing convinces us that the

finding of the magistrate judge and the district court that Flores consented to a

search of his tractor trailer is not clearly erroneous and that the court properly

applied the Fourth Amendment to that finding. The judgment of the district court

2
is therefore

AFFIRMED.

3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             720
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,467
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        517
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,843
<PP&E>                                           5,744
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,373
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,268
<BONDS>                                            479
<COMMON>                                            80
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,144
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,938
<SALES>                                          7,406
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,406
<CGS>                                            6,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  76
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    135
<INCOME-TAX>                                        62
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 73
<DISCONTINUED>                                     280
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       353
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.63
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 274/18 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 274 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6018 August 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 274

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6018 August 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 274/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 274/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Regency
Affiliates, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Laurence S. Levy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as
      of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the
      Company for the periods presented.

Dated: November 20, 2006


/s/ Laurence S. Levy
-------------------------------------
Laurence S. Levy
President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       24
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

TODD R. GERMAN,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:13-cr-030

Judge Peter C. Economus

ORDER

There being no objections, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Dkt. 11) that Defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The Court accepts 

Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count One of the Information, on which Defendant is hereby 

adjudged guilty.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case: 2:13-cr-00030-PCE-NMK Doc #: 14 Filed: 04/18/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
#### Mrs. Ferdinand Castagnola *v.*United States

No. 7619.

Appraisement Entry Nos. 420 and 417.

— Entered at Los Angeles, Calif.

(Decided September 27, 1948)

Plaintiff- not represented by counsel.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General *(Joseph E. Weil*and *William-J. Vitale,*special attorneys), for the defendant.

Cline, Judge:

These are appeals for reappraisement of certain, .earthenware, glassware, and marble statues imported from Italy on *304December 20 and December 30, 1946. The importer requested ap-praisement under section 498 (a) (5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 for the reason that the articles were gifts from her brother in Italy. Subsequent to appraisement, these appeals were filed.

When the cases were first called for trial the importer appeared and ■stated that the merchandise consisted of gifts to the family; that she Rad no invoices; and that she had no evidence other than the actual .articles. The cases were continued to the next docket to give her an ■opportunity to obtain proof of value.

When the cases were called again there was no appearance on the part of the ■ plaintiff. Counsel for the Government asked that her nonapp ear anee be noted and that the cases be marked submitted. It was so ordered.

An examination of the official record discloses nothing to disturb the values found by the appraiser, which are presumptively correct.

Therefore, I find the appraised values to be the proper dutiable values for the merchandise. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07

- 24

- 00106

- CR
STAAR MONIQUE DOMINGUEZ , A PPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 69th District Court Moore County, Texas Trial Court No

. 6072 , Honorable Kimberly Allen , Presiding



### September 17 , 2024 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. Appellant, Staar Monique Dominguez, appeals from the trial court’s judgment revoking her community supervision for the offense of possession of a controlled substance 1 and sentencing her to twenty

- four months of confinement in a state jail facility. Appellant ’ s brief was originally due May 23 , 2024, but we granted Appellant’s counsel three e xtensions to file a brief. By letter of August 2 , 2024 , we admonished counsel that

1 See T EX

. H EALTH & S AFETY C ODE A NN . § 481.115(b).2

no further extensions would be granted and that failure to file a brief by August 23 w ould result in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings without further notice. To date, A ppellant ’ s counsel has not filed a brief or had any further communication with this Court.
Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall determine the following:
(1) whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal; (2) whether A ppellant is indigent; (3) if A ppellant is not indigent, whether Appellant has made the necessary arrangements for filing a brief; (4) why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on A ppellant ’s behalf ; (5) whether A ppellant ’ s counsel has abandoned the appeal; (6) whether A ppellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel; (7) whether new counsel should be appointed; and (8) if A ppellant desires to continue the appeal, the date the C ourt may expect A ppellant ’ s brief to be filed.
T he trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this C ourt by October 17 , 2024

. If it is determined that A ppellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint h er new3

counsel; the name, address, email address, tele phone number, and state bar number of any newly appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.

Should Appellant’s counsel file a brief on or before October 8 , 2024 , s he is directed to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall not be required to take any further action.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam Do not publish.
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors, PNCFinancial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland LoanServices, a division of PNC Bank, National Association (“Midland”or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for alltransactions serviced on the *Enterprise!* Loan Management System (the“Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D),1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which theCompany has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performedby it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company'scompliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express anopinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedasset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing ofselected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that Midland complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 17, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816)218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*

* *
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 7, 2010

p0331 

# Order

April 7, 2010

140084

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140084 COA: 294355 Jackson CC: 08-004192-FH CURTIS ALVIN CRAFT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 12, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
(logo)CWCapital

ASSETMANAGEMENT

 

 

**Annual Statement asto Compliance**

**For the Period ofJanuary 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017**

* *

* ***CFCRE 2016-C3**

 

  

In accordance with Item 1123 of RegulationAB and****with the requirements detailed in §10.11 of the PoolingandServicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) for the above-mentioned CMBS pool, (the“CMBS Pool”), CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”), in its capacity asSpecial Servicer, is providing this Officer’s Certificate with respect to thefollowing:

 

(A)      a review of CWCAM’s activities during the period noted above (the"Reporting Period") and of CWCAM’s performance under the Agreementhas been made under my supervision;

 

(B)      to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

Shouldyou have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.  

 

Sincerely,

CWCapitalAsset Management LLC

 

 

/s/David B. Iannarone 

DavidB. Iannarone

President

 

 

7501Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 500 West, Bethesda, MD 20814

www.cwcapital.com
1

Amendment 1

Memorandum of Agreement

Among the

Federal Transit Administration, Federal Railroad Administration, and the

California State Historic Preservation Officer

For the

Transbay Terminal/Caltrain Downtown Extension/Redevelopment Project

in San Francisco County, California

Whereas, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 USC 470 et 

seq. requires Federal Agencies to take into account the effects of their 

undertakings on historic properties; and

Whereas, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) may assist the Transbay 

Joint Powers Authority (TJPA), the City and County of San Francisco (CCSF), 

the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (JPB), and the San Francisco 

Redevelopment Agency (SFRA) with construction of the proposed federally 

assisted undertaking is the a new multi-modal Terminal (Terminal) on the site of 

the present Transbay Transit Terminal (TTT), extension of the Peninsula Corridor 

Service (Caltrain) from its current San Francisco terminus at Fourth and 

Townsend Streets to a new underground terminus beneath the new Terminal, 

which will also accommodate high-speed rail service, and establishment of a 

Redevelopment Area Plan with related development projects, including transitoriented development on publicly-owned land in the vicinity of the new multimodal Terminal; and

Whereas, WHEREAS, on June 12, 2004, FTA, SHPO, TJPA, CCSF, JPB and 

SFRA entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) regarding the 

Undertaking; and

Whereas, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) has reserved funds through 

the High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) Program, to fund certain rail 

facilities of the Terminal; and

Whereas, in order to consider providing financial participation in the Federal 

Transit Administration undertaking, the FRA wishes to adopt the provisions of the 

MOA by becoming an additional signatory to the MOA; and

Whereas, Stipulation VII of the current MOA allows for a process to make 

amendments to the MOA; and

Now Therefore, FTA and the SHPO and the other parties hereto agree to the 

addition of the FRA as a signatory to the Memorandum of Agreement with the 

following stipulations: