alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 236/17 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 236 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6317 July 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 236

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6317 July 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 236/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 236/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 236/02 | State aid — Spain — State aid SA.33909 (2013/C, ex 2013/NN, ex 2011/CP) — Alleged aid to Ryanair and other airlines at Girona and Reus Airports — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 13 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 236/02

State aid — Spain — State aid SA.33909 (2013/C, ex 2013/NN, ex 2011/CP) — Alleged aid to Ryanair and other airlines at Girona and Reus Airports — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

13

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
No. 45153.

#### Protest 17313-K of Bullocks, Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was agreed by the respective parties that certain of the merchandise consists of woven mufflers similar to those the subject of Abstract 44055. In accordance therewith the claim at 35 percent under paragraph 1209 and T. D. 49753 was sustained as to those mufflers.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-41048 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ARTURO REYNOSO-ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-98-CR-417-1

- - - - - - - - - - July 23, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Arturo Reynoso-Ortiz appeals the sentence imposed by the district court after he pleaded guilty to illegally transporting aliens within the United States. He argues that the district court erred by declining to award him a three-level reduction pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(1) because he committed the offense in return for his own transportation into the U.S. and thus “other than for profit.” Reynoso-Ortiz bears the burden of proof to show the lack of any profit motive. See United States v. Cuellar-Flores , 891 F.2d 92, 93 (5th Cir. 1989).No. 98-41048 -2- The district court concluded that because Reynoso-Ortiz did not have to pay a fee of several hundred dollars in exchange for his driving the van, the offense was not “other than for profit” within the meaning of § 2L1.1(b)(1). Although he challenges the district court’s interpretation of the guideline as illogical, Reynoso-Ortiz has not met his burden of showing that he was entitled to the reduction. See Cuellar-Flores , 891 F.2d at 93;

see also United States v. Perez-Ruiz , 169 F.3d 1075, 1076 (7th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 15(a)
                                                               
                                                               
May 8, 1998


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We are aware that our report dated May 5, 1998 (issued pursuant
to the provisions of Statement on Auditing Standards No. 71) has 
been incorporated by reference by UniSource Energy Corporation in 
the Prospectuses constituting part of its Registration Statements 
on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-43765, 333-43767 and 333-43769) and by 
Tucson Electric Power Company in the Prospectus constituting part 
of its Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No, 33-55732).
We are also aware of our responsibilities under the Securities Act 
of 1933.

Yours very truly,


Price Waterhouse LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

ANDRE R. KABIR,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

vs.

 CASE NO. 2:12-CV-0641

PATRICK R. DONAHUE, JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

POSTMASTER GENERAL, MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH P. DEAVERS

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,

Defendant.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed August 16, 2013, JUDGMENT is hereby

entered DISMISSING this case.

Date: August 16, 2013 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-00641-EAS-EPD Doc #: 16 Filed: 08/16/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 5, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-60583 Summary Calendar

In The Matter Of: RONALD ELLZY WOODALL,

Debtor,

RONALD ELLZY WOODALL; MISSISSIPPI INSURANCE

GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION,
Appellees,

versus

DORIS MERCHANT; DON WHITE,
Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

(2:01-CV-328-PG)

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Doris Merchant and Don White appeal the district court’s

reversal of a bankruptcy court order autho rizing lifting an

automatic bankruptcy stay to allow a medical malpractice action to
proceed to trial against the debtor in state court. The only issue
for the district court was whether insurance coverage existed for2

the claim ed malpractice — if so, the stay-lift was appropriate.

The district court determined there was no coverage because the

debtor (ins ured) failed to report the claim to the insurance
company within the policy period as required by the policy.

Our review is de novo
. E .g. , In re Sutton , 904 F.2d 327, 329
(5th Cir. 1990). Based upon the parties’ briefs and the relevant
portions of the record, especially the insurance policy, and
essentially for the reasons stated by the district court in its
comprehensive opinion, the reversal of the stay-lift was proper.

AFFIRMED
First Amendment to Teradata Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan



 Exhibit 10.7 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO THE TERADATA CORPORATION EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 
 AMENDMENT TO THE TERADATA CORPORATION EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (the “Plan”) as adopted and in effect October 1, 2007 by Teradata
Corporation (“Teradata”). 
 WHEREAS, the Plan was adopted effective October 1, 2007; and 
 WHEREAS, Teradata desires to amend the Plan to allow greater flexibility in determining the period in which eligible employees may become participants
under the Plan; 
 WHEREAS, Teradata desires to permit the Vice President, Human Resources, to have the authority to determine such periods
pursuant to the authority granted to such executive officer under the terms of the Plan; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, Teradata does hereby amend the
Plan, effective as of August 1, 2008, as follows: 
 Section 5 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

  

	 	5.	Entry Into the Plan; Stock Purchase Agreements 

 Any
Eligible Employee may become a Participant in the Plan by filing a stock purchase agreement (a “Stock Purchase Agreement”) in accordance with procedures established by the Vice President, Human Resources. Once an Eligible
Employee has filed a Stock Purchase Agreement and become a Participant in the Plan, he shall remain a Participant until he withdraws from the Plan in accordance with Section 13 hereof, and he shall not be required to file a Stock Purchase
Agreement for any succeeding Offering or Plan Year until he withdraws from the Plan. 
 A Participant may change his level of payroll
deduction in accordance with procedures established by the Vice President, Human Resources. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Teradata has caused this amendment to the Plan to be executed this 29th day of July, 2008.

  

			
	FOR TERADATA CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Saundra Davis

		 	Saundra Davis
		 	Vice President, Human Resources
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

James Boles, :

Plaintiff, : Case No. 2:12-cv-1141

v. : JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST

Magistrate Judge Kemp

Ohio Department of 

Rehabilitation and Correction,

et al., :

Defendants. :

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff James Boles, a state prisoner, began this action 

by filing a motion for a temporary restraining order. 

Subsequently, he submitted a complaint and a motion for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis, which is being addressed in a separate

order. This order deals with his request for a temporary

restraining order.

In his motion, Mr. Boles claimed that after he was assaulted

by inmates at the North Central Correctional Institution, he was

transferred to the Ross Correctional Institution, where the

inmate who ordered the assault was also housed. He asserted that

he was threatened by that inmate that if he did not “ride out” he

would be harmed. He asked the Court to order him to be

transferred to the Lorain Correctional Institution.

Since that motion was filed, Mr. Boles has been transferred

out of RCI. His more recent filings indicate that he now resides

at the Mansfield Correctional Institution. That being so, his

request for a transfer from RCI is now moot. The Court therefore

RECOMMENDS that the Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order

(Doc. No. 2) be denied.

Case: 2:12-cv-01141-GLF-TPK Doc #: 9 Filed: 01/23/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
If any party objects to this Report and Recommendation, that

party may, within fourteen days of this Report, file and serve on

all parties written objections to those specific proposed

findings or recommendations to which objection is made, together

with supporting authority for the objection(s). A judge of this

Court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the

report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which

objection is made. Upon proper objections, a judge of this Court

may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings

or recommendations made herein, may receive further evidence or

may recommit this matter to the magistrate judge with

instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

The parties are specifically advised that failure to object

to the Report and Recommendation will result in a waiver of the

right to have the district judge review the Report and

Recommendation de novo, and also operates as a waiver of the

right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the

Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140

(1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). 

 /s/ Terence P. Kemp 

United States Magistrate Judge

 

-2-

Case: 2:12-cv-01141-GLF-TPK Doc #: 9 Filed: 01/23/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2022271EN.01000701.xml

| 14.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/7

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2022/C 271/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 23 February 2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 88118 |
| Decision No | 052/22/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Prolongation of a zero VAT rate for certain electronic news services |
| Legal basis | Act on Value Added Tax of 19 June 2009, No 58; and Regulation concerning Value Added Tax of 15 December 2009, No 1540 |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Support the demand and consumption of news and current affairs content among consumers; and to promote media pluralism and diversity |
| Form of aid | Zero VAT rate |
| Budget | Approx. NOK 500 million/year |
| Duration | Until 1 Mars 2028 |
| Economic sectors | Broadcasting and on-demand news services mainly containing audio or audio-visual content |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministry of Finance |
| P.O. Box 8008 Dep. |
| N-0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

23 February 2022

Case No

88118

Decision No

052/22/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Prolongation of a zero VAT rate for certain electronic news services

Legal basis

Act on Value Added Tax of 19 June 2009, No 58; and Regulation concerning Value Added Tax of 15 December 2009, No 1540

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Support the demand and consumption of news and current affairs content among consumers; and to promote media pluralism and diversity

Form of aid

Zero VAT rate

Budget

Approx. NOK 500 million/year

Duration

Until 1 Mars 2028

Economic sectors

Broadcasting and on-demand news services mainly containing audio or audio-visual content

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministry of Finance

P.O. Box 8008 Dep.

N-0030 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Internet: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 40

JOINT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the printing and binding of a supplement to,

and revised edition of, Senate Procedure.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRINTING OF SUPPLEMENT TO, AND REVISED EDITION OF, SENATE PROCEDURE.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Each of the following documents

shall be prepared under the supervision of Alan Frumin, Parliamentarian and Parliamentarian Emeritus of the Senate,

and shall be printed and bound as a Senate document:

(1) A supplement to ‘‘Riddick’s Senate Procedure’’,

to be styled ‘‘Frumin’s Supplement to Riddick’s Senate

Procedure’’.

(2) A revised edition of ‘‘Riddick’s Senate Procedure’’, to be styled ‘‘Frumin’s Senate Procedure’’.
 †

2

SJ 40 ES

(b) COPIES.—One thousand five hundred copies of each

document described in subsection (a) shall be printed for distribution to Senators and for the use of the Senate.

Passed the Senate June 29, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 40

JOINT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the printing and binding of a suppledure. ment to, and revised edition of, Senate Proce-
No. 54838.

#### Royal Dutch Products Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 156767-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the case was called for trial there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff and the court ordered it dismissed. The protest was therefore dismissed.
No. 54828.

#### S. B. Penick & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 145430-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protest was dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 306 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 306

  Recognizing that Veterans Day is a day to honor all veterans of the 
Army and to support the Army Freedom Team Salute's mission to recognize 
            the unsung heroes who have served this country.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 10, 2005

     Mr. Akaka (for himself and Mr. Bond) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing that Veterans Day is a day to honor all veterans of the 
Army and to support the Army Freedom Team Salute's mission to recognize 
            the unsung heroes who have served this country.

Whereas Army personnel have for 230 years answered the call to duty by becoming 
        guardians and defenders of America's freedoms;
Whereas millions of Army veterans selflessly served this Nation and their legacy 
        of duty has reigned in their continued support of the mission of the 
        Army;
Whereas the Army appreciates the sacrifices these courageous men and women have 
        made in answering the call to duty by choosing a life of service;
Whereas the 83rd Congress created Veterans Day as a national day of observance 
        to commemorate the heroes who served in the Armed Forces and the Army 
        recognizes the importance of honoring those who have served their 
        country; and
Whereas the Army created the Freedom Team Salute program to provide a way for 
        the United States and the Army to thank its veterans: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate recognizes that November 11, 2005, 
Veterans Day, is a day to honor all Army veterans and supports the Army 
Freedom Team Salute's mission to recognize the unsung heroes who have 
served this country.
                                 <all>
```
No. 65686.

#### Pan American Food Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 304019-K and 304023-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                             TRANS-INDUSTRIES, INC.

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trans-Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Richard A.
Solon, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Richard A. Solon
-------------------------------------
Name: Richard A. Solon
Title: Chairman and
       Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 14, 2005

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate
disclosure document.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form
10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 of Toreador
Resources Corporation (the "Issuer").

I, Douglas W. Weir, Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to my
knowledge:

         (1)      The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Issuer at the dates and for the periods indicated.

/s/ Douglas W. Weir
------------------------------------
Douglas W. Weir
Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  May 21, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Toreador Resources Corporation and will be retained by Toreador
Resources Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 118 

Recognizing June 2 through June 5, 2005, as the ‘‘Vermont Dairy Festival’’, 

in honor of Harold Howrigan for his service to his community and 

the Vermont dairy industry. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 21, 2005 

Mr. JEFFORDS (for himself and Mr. LEAHY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and 

Forestry 

APRIL 27, 2005 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing June 2 through June 5, 2005, as the ‘‘Vermont 

Dairy Festival’’, in honor of Harold Howrigan for his 

service to his community and the Vermont dairy industry. 

Whereas the town of Enosburg Falls, Vermont, will host the 

‘‘Vermont Dairy Festival’’ from June 2 through June 5, 

2005; 

Whereas the men and women of the Enosburg Lions Club 

will sponsor the Vermont Dairy Festival, which celebrates 

its 49th year; 
2 

SRES 118 ATS 

Whereas the Vermont Dairy Festival is a beloved expression 

of the civic pride and agricultural heritage of the people 

of Enosburg Falls and Franklin County, Vermont; 

Whereas the people of Enosburg Falls and Franklin County 

have long-held traditions of family owned and operated 

dairy farms; 

Whereas the St. Albans Cooperative Creamery, Inc., which 

was established in 1919, is a farmer-owned cooperative; 

Whereas Harold Howrigan served on the Board of the St. Albans Cooperative for 24 years; 

Whereas Mr. Howrigan was the President of the Board of the 

St. Albans Cooperative for 17 years; 

Whereas Mr. Howrigan recently retired from his position as 

President of the Board of the St. Albans Cooperative; 

and 

Whereas Mr. Howrigan led the St. Albans Cooperative to uphold the region’s traditions and to meet future challenges: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognizes June 2 through 

2 June 5, 2005, as the ‘‘Vermont Dairy Festival’’, in honor 

3 of Harold Howrigan for his service to his community and 

4 the Vermont dairy industry. 

Æ
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA, Appellant,
v. SUNVIEW SOFTWARE, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee. No. 2D23-478 September 1, 2023 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Mark Wolfe, Judge. Jeremy D. Bailie and R. Quincy Bird of Weber, Crabb & Wein, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellant. Jay M. Levy of Jay M. Levy, P.A., Miami, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.