alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form
10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 of Toreador
Resources Corporation (the "Issuer").

I, G. Thomas Graves III, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer,
certify that to my knowledge:

         (1)      The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Issuer at the dates and for the periods indicated.

/s/ G. Thomas Graves III
------------------------------------
G. Thomas Graves III
President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  May 21, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Toreador Resources Corporation and will be retained by Toreador
Resources Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TOROTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONTAINED IN ITS 
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 1997, 
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                           136,000
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,966,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     85,000
<INVENTORY>                                      2,978,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>	                                5,150,000
<PP&E>                                           4,575,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,819,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,169,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,828,000
<BONDS>			                                  					0
<COMMON>			                                  				1,440,000	
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,807,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,169,000
<SALES>                                          3,377,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,377,000
<CGS>                                            2,451,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,262,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 70,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               67,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (22,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (22,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (22,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Charles T. Dickson, Chief Financial Officer of United Components, Inc.certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of United Components,Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 13, 2004       By:  /s/ Charles T. Dickson     Name: Charles T. Dickson Title: Chief Financial Officer
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 472 

Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by 

the men and women who have lost their lives while serving as law 

enforcement officers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2006 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. FRIST, Mr. REID, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. 

OBAMA, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. GRAHAM, 

Ms. STABENOW, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. ALLEN, Ms. CANTWELL, and Mr. 

KYL) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by the men and women who have lost their 

lives while serving as law enforcement officers. 

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is 

preserved and enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance 

and dedication of law enforcement personnel; 

Whereas more than 900,000 men and women, at great risk 

to their personal safety, presently serve their fellow citizens as guardians of peace; 

Whereas peace officers are on the front lines in preserving 

the right of the children of the United States to receive 

an education in a crime-free environment, a right that is 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 472 ATS

all too often threatened by the insidious fear caused by 

violence in schools; 

Whereas 156 peace officers across the United States were 

killed in the line of duty during 2005, which is below the 

decade-long annual average of 167 deaths; 

Whereas a number of factors contributed to this reduction in 

deaths, including— 

(1) better equipment and increased use of bullet-resistant vests; 

(2) improved training; 

(3) longer prison terms for violent offenders; and 

(4) advanced emergency medical care; 

Whereas every other day, 1 out of every 16 peace officers is 

assaulted, 1 out of every 56 peace officers is injured, and 

1 out of every 5,500 peace officers is killed in the line 

of duty somewhere in the United States; and 

Whereas on May 15, 2006, more than 20,000 peace officers 

are expected to gather in Washington, D.C., to join with 

the families of their recently fallen comrades to honor 

those comrades and all others who went before them: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes May 15, 2006, as ‘‘Peace Offi3 cers Memorial Day’’, in honor of the Federal, State, 

4 and local officers that have been killed or disabled 

5 in the line of duty; and 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 472 ATS

1 (2) calls on the people of the United States to 

2 observe that day with appropriate ceremonies and 

3 respect. 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 18 August 2006         

amending Decision 2005/734/EC as regards certain additional risk mitigating measures against the spread of avian influenza

(notified under document number C(2006) 3702)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/574/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 2005/734/EC is amended as follows:

Article 2

Member States shall immediately take the necessary measures to comply with this Decision and publish those measures. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 August 2006.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 29. Directive as last amended by Directive 2002/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 315, 19.11.2002, p. 14).

(2)OJ L 274, 20.10.2005, p. 105. Decision as last amended by Decision 2006/405/EC (OJ L 158, 10.6.2006, p. 14).

(3)OJ L 274, 20.10.2005, p. 95.

----
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-10756

Conference Calendar

 

RICKY ZAMORA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL A. WILSON; 

DARWIN D. SANDERS,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:96-CV-25

- - - - - - - - - -

October 23, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ricky Zamora, Texas prisoner # 556986, appeals the district

court’s dismissal as frivolous of his civil rights action against

Darwin D. Sanders, the warden at the Clements Unit. Although

Zamora states as the appellate issue that the district court

abused its discretion in dismissing his complaint, he has failed

to brief any argument on appeal, and his claims are deemed
No. 96-10756

- 2 -

abandoned. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir.

1993). Because Zamora has presented no legal points arguable on

their merits, the appeal is frivolous, and it is DISMISSED. See

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. Rule

42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

RAY S. LIVINGSTON,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

OHIO BUREAU OF CASE NO. 2:13-CV-0047

MOTOR VEHICLES, JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK R. ABEL

Defendant.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed September 19, 2013, JUDGMENT is

hereby entered DISMISSING this case.

Date: September 19, 2013 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:13-cv-00047-EAS-MRA Doc #: 10 Filed: 09/19/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
#### L. Bamberger & Co. *v.*United States

No. 6362. Entry No. N-238.

Invoice dated London, England, November 1942.

Certified November 1942.

Entered at Newark, N. J., December 29, 1942.

(Decided September 19, 1946)

*Strauss & Hedges*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware and chinaware here involved, and that such values are the entered values. Insofar as the appeal relates to all other merchandise it is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
----

REPORT

on the annual accounts of the European Training Foundation for the financial year 2004 together with the Foundation's replies

(2005/C 332/11)

CONTENTS

Tables 1 to 4

The Foundation's replies

INTRODUCTION

THE COURT'S OPINION

Reliability of the accountsExcept for the situation described in paragraph 8, the Foundation's accounts for the financial year ended 31 December 2004 are, in all material respects, reliable.Legality and regularity of the underlying transactionsThe transactions underlying the Foundation's annual accounts, taken as a whole, are legal and regular.

OBSERVATIONS

This report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 5 October 2005.

For the Court of Auditors

Hubert WEBER

President

----

(1)OJ L 131, 23.5.1990.

(2)OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

(3)  These accounts were drawn up on 18 August 2005 and received by the Court on 22 September 2005.

(4)  Article 6(1) and (2) of the Foundation's financial regulation.

(5)  Paragraph 9 of the report for the financial year 2002 (OJ C 319, 30.12.2003, p. 48), paragraph 8 of the report for the financial year 2001 (OJ C 326, 27.12.2002, p. 51) and paragraph 11 of the report for the financial year 1999 (OJ C 373, 27.12.2000, p. 34).

(6)  The total for payments made in 2004 for the implementation of the Tempus programmes was 9,3 million euro.

(7)  Article 22 of the Foundation's financial regulation.

(8)  Article 27(3) of the Foundation's financial regulation.

(9)  Article 16 of the Foundation's financial regulation.

----

Table 1

European Training Foundation (Turin)

Table 2

European Training Foundation — Implementation of the budget for the financial year 2004

Table 3

European Training Foundation — Revenue and expenditure account for the financial years 2004 and 2003 (1)

Table 4

European Training Foundation — Balance sheet at 31 December 2004 and 31 December 2003 (2)

----

(1)  The revenue and expenditure account and balance sheet only take account of the Foundation's specific activities: they do not include programmes managed on behalf of the Commission.

Source: Foundation data — This table summarises the data supplied by the Foundation in its annual accounts.

(2)  The revenue and expenditure account and balance sheet only take account of the Foundation's specific activities: they do not include programmes managed on behalf of the Commission.

Source: Foundation data — This table summarises the data supplied by the Foundation in its annual accounts.

----

THE FOUNDATION'S REPLIES

----
(Reap. Dec. 8951)

Entry No. 10041.

#### John L. Domann *v.*United States

(Decided July 25, 1957)

*Stein & Shostak (Richard M. Kozinn*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Mollie Strum,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement involves the proper value of two “Goliath” automobiles, One a passenger automobile and the other a station wagon, imported from Germany on December 13, 1952, and entered at the port of Los Angeles. The merchandise was appraised at values higher than those at which entered.

At the trial, the case was submitted on an oral stipulation, wherein the parties agreed that cost of production, section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for appraisement of the items in question, and that such values are deutschemarks 4,863 for the Goliath passenger automobile and deutschemarks 5,073 for the Goliath station wagon.

On the agreed facts, I find cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are deutschemarks 4,863 for the Goliath passenger automobile and deutschemarks 5,073 for the Goliath station wagon.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Request for Public Comments on Exceptional Events in the Greater Phoenix Area

In 2005, Congress identified a need to account for events that result in exceedances of the 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) that are exceptional in nature (e.g., not 

expected to reoccur or caused by acts of nature beyond man-made controls.) In response, EPA 

promulgated the Exceptional Events Rule (EER) to address exceptional events in 40 CFR Parts 

50 and 51 on March 22, 2007 (72 FR 13560). On May 2, 2011, EPA released draft guidance 

documents on the implementation of the EER to State, tribal and local air agencies for review. 

The EER allows for states and tribes to “flag” air quality monitoring data as an exceptional 

event. If flagged, these data can be excluded from consideration in air quality planning if EPA 

concurs with the demonstration submitted by the flagging agency documenting that all 

procedural and technical requirements have been met. 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 50.14(c)(3)(i), the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) is 

soliciting comments on its final demonstrations of events that have caused elevated 

concentrations of PM10 in the Greater Phoenix area on September 11 & 12, 2011 and June 16; 

June 27; July 11; August 11; August 14; and September 6, 2012. ADEQ has decided to flag these 

episodes based on these analyses. Copies of the demonstrations are available for review 

beginning Monday, January 14, 2013, on the ADEQ website at 

www.azdeq.gov/environ/air/plan/. Interested parties can submit written comments throughout the 

comment period which will end at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 12, 2013. Any comments 

received will be responded to and forwarded to EPA with the final demonstrations. 

Written comments should be addressed, faxed, or e-mailed to: 

Andra Juniel, Air Assessment Section, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, 1110 W. 

Washington Street, 3415-A, Phoenix, AZ 85007, PHONE: (602) 771-4417; FAX: (602) 771-

2366, E-mail: juniel.andra@azdeq.gov. 

In addition to being available on-line, copies of the analyses are available for review, Monday 

through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., at the ADEQ Records Management Center, 1110 W. 

Washington St., Phoenix, AZ, 85007, Attn: Records Center, (602) 771-4380, email: 

recordscenter@azdeq.gov. 

Persons with a disability may request reasonable accommodations by contacting Linda Morrison 

at (602) 771-4793 or 1-800-234-5677 ext. 771-4793. This document is available in alternative 

formats by contacting ADEQ TDD phone number at (602) 771-4829.
- fplr2247-1
- fplr2247-2
- fplr2247-3
- fplr2247-4
- fplr2247-5
- fplr2247-6
- fplr2247-7
- fplr2247-8
- fplr2247-9
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Marathon Patent Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Doug Croxall, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: June 12, 2014


/s/ Doug CroxallDoug Croxall Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)