alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 454 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 454

      Honoring Malcom P. McLean as the father of containerization.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 27, 2006

 Mr. Lautenberg (for himself, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Inouye, and Mrs. Dole) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Honoring Malcom P. McLean as the father of containerization.

Whereas Malcom P. McLean is widely recognized as the father of containerization;
Whereas the innovative idea of using intermodal containers suitable for rail, 
        truck, and maritime transportation revolutionized and streamlined the 
        process of shipping goods, allowed products to be moved to the market 
        more quickly, and reduced prices for consumers;
Whereas the use of containerization in shipping practices enabled the United 
        States to increase international trade by modernizing and globalizing 
        the economy of the United States;
Whereas Mr. McLean launched numerous successful transportation businesses that 
        were located in the Port of Newark, New Jersey, including--

    (1) the Pan-Atlantic Steamship Company; and

    (2) Sea-Land Service Incorporated;

Whereas those businesses were crucial to the growth of shipping and industry in 
        New Jersey;
Whereas the innovations of Mr. McLean have enabled businesses to create 
        thousands of jobs that provide liveable wages for the citizens of New 
        Jersey and other citizens of the United States;
Whereas, on April 26, 1956, the first ship loaded with goods to be transported 
        from the United States in intermodal containers, the Ideal X, set sail 
        from Port Newark under the direction of Mr. McLean;
Whereas 2006 marks the 50th anniversary of that historic event;
Whereas the Containerization and Intermodal Institute in Holmdel, New Jersey, 
        has planned activities to commemorate that occasion; and
Whereas Mr. McLean was a transportation pioneer whose remarkable achievements 
        are worthy of recognition and commemoration: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) celebrates the remarkable contributions of Malcom P. 
        McLean to the development of a new era of trade and commerce in 
        the United States through the containerization of cargo;
            (2) honors the 50th anniversary of containerization, and 
        recognizes the crucial role that containerization has played in 
        the modernization of--
                    (A) shipping practices; and
                    (B) the economy of the United States; and
            (3) encourages all citizens to promote and participate in 
        celebratory activities that commemorate that landmark 
        anniversary.
                                 <all>
```
May 28, 1958

No. 62033.

Suit 4919.

#### Marshall Field & Company *v.*United States.

C. D. 1853 reversed January 22, .1958. C. A. D. 676.
Before the Third Division,

April 14, 1944

No. 49330.

#### Protests 35730-K, etc., of R. H. Macy & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of portions of cheese packed in boxes and that all such portions, except those described as Tilsit, are similar in all material respects to the cheese involved in *Gruyere Cheese Corp. et al.*v. *United States*(7 Cust. Ct. 171, C. D. 562) and *Kraft Phenix Cheese Corp.*v. *United States*(10 id. 271, C. D. 767), and that each of the said portions of cheese comprises an equal part of the appraised unit of value. In accordance therewith and following the cited decisions, which were admitted in evidence, the protests were sustained to this extent.
Case: 2:12-cv-01187-EAS-EPD Doc #: 54 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T19:54:24-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v JAMES E. MALLARD, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant

19 USCMA 457, 42 CMR 59

No. 22,580

May 28, 1970

*Colonel Daniel T. Ghent*and *Captain Lee A. Rau*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel David T. Bryant, Major Edwin P. Wasinger,*and *Captain Edwin L. Gage*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

DARDEN, Judge:

The appellant pleaded and was found guilty of desertion that began March 10, 1968, and ended by apprehension on May 13, 1969. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for three years. The term of the confinement was then reduced by the convening authority to one year and six months in compliance with a pretrial agreement. In extenuation and mitigation, the appellant informed the court through counsel that during the desertion period he had used drugs and had twice almost killed himself with an overdose. Since this is evidence of other misconduct, Mallard now contends that for sentence purposes the law officer erred in not giving limiting instructions. See United States v Rodriguez, 17 USCMA 54, 37 CMR 318 (1967); United States v Baskin, 17 USCMA *458315, 38 CMR 113 (1967); United States v Averette, 17 USCMA 319, 38 CMR 117 (1967).

The Manual for Courts-Martial that became effective January 1, 1969, changed the law by permitting consideration of other offenses or acts of misconduct for sentencing purposes. Paragraph 76a (2), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969; United States v Worley, 19 USCMA 444, 42 CMR 46 (1970). *Sua sponte*limiting instructions generally are no longer required. When the offense for which the accused was tried occurred before the effective date of the 1969 Manual, however, such evidence has the potential for *ex post facto*effect. United States v Griffin, 19 USCMA 348, 41 CMR 348 (1970). This is such an instance, since desertion is not a continuing offense. United States v Ray, 7 USCMA 378, 22 CMR 168 (1956).

Considering the nature of the evidence of the other misconduct, coupled with the knowledge that the court-martial gave Mallard the maximum punishment permissible for the desertion charged, we think the error in this case may have been harmful. If this evidence had been omitted, we doubt that the appellant would have received more than his pretrial agreement called for. Under these circumstances the decision of the United States Army Court of Military Review as to sentence is set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for resubmission to the Court of Military Review for reconsideration of the sentence. United States v Rodriguez; United States v Baskin; United States v Averette; all supra.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Judge Ferguson concurs in the result.
No. 59169.

protests 512232-G, 551040-G, and 577814-G (New York).

#### North China Produce Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FILED AS
PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ON FORM 10-Q.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                 2,613
<SECURITIES>                                           3,127
<RECEIVABLES>                                          7,579
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                            6,952
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      21,056
<PP&E>                                               125,104
<DEPRECIATION>                                        42,382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       112,829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 10,339
<BONDS>                                               31,454
<COMMON>                                               2,740
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                            22,586
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         112,829
<SALES>                                                8,693
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      14,652
<CGS>                                                  6,694
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         10,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     1,278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (1,250)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            (562)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (688)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (688)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (0.55)


</TABLE>
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Pathway to fishing: Fish handling, how to handle a: Trout, Bass, Catfish, Sunfish, Walleye

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Pathway to fishing: Fish handling, how to handle a: Trout, Bass, Catfish, Sunfish, Walleye 
                    -           Alternative Title        
                    -  Fish handling, how to handle a, Trout, Bass, Catfish, Sunfish, Walleye 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  199 × 70 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  028153923.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
The Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-2111

___________

Louisa Shelton, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of *

Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: November 26, 1998

 Filed: December 14, 1998 

___________

Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPARD

ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Louisa Shelton appeals the district court&s grant of summary judgment

1

affirming the Social Security Commissioner&s decision to deny her application for

disability insurance benefits (DIB) and supplemental security income (SSI). We

affirm.
-2-

Ms. Shelton filed the instant applications for DIB and SSI alleging she was

disabled due to degenerative arthritis, chronic pain, and muscle stiffness in the neck,

shoulders, and right arm and leg. The administrative law judge (ALJ) found that Ms.

Shelton did not have a severe impairment. Ms. Shelton contends that the ALJ

improperly failed to consider the assessment of her treating physician.

We review the ALJ&s decision to determine whether it is supported by

substantial evidence in the record as a whole--that is, whether there exists relevant

evidence that a reasonable person might accept as adequate to support the conclusion.

See Murphy v. Sullivan, 953 F.2d 383, 384 (8th Cir. 1992) (standard of review). We

find that the ALJ did not err in discounting Ms. Shelton&s subjective complaints of pain

under the standards set out in Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320, 1322 (8th Cir. 1984).

The ALJ considered the minimal objective medical evidence and the lack of large

doses of pain medication. See Richmond v. Shalala, 23 F.3d 1441, 1443-44 (8th Cir.

1994) (lack of strong pain medication is inconsistent with complaints of disabling

pain); Beeler v. Bowen, 833 F.2d 124, 126-27 (8th Cir. 1987) (absence of objective

medical evidence is one factor ALJ may consider); see also Dixon v. Sullivan, 905

F.2d 237, 238 (8th Cir. 1990) (if ALJ explicitly discredits claimant&s testimony and

gives good reason for doing so, this court normally defers to ALJ&s judgment).

We also find that the ALJ did not err in discounting the opinion of Ms. Shelton&s

treating physician, as his assessment was based primarily on Ms. Shelton&s subjective

statements regarding her level of pain, and Ms. Shelton&s mental examination indicated

that she was prone to report physical ailments in response to stress. See Ostronski v.

Chater, 94 F.3d 413, 421 (8th Cir. 1996) (physician&s opinion of disability properly

given less than controlling weight when unaccompanied by objective findings, but

instead is based solely on subjective complaints).

Accordingly, we affirm.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1834/2006

of 12 December 2006         

establishing a prohibition of fishing for hake in ICES zone VIII c, IX, X, CECAF 34.1.1 (EC waters) by vessels flying the flag of Portugal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy (1), and in particular Article 26(4) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to common fisheries policy (2), and in particular Article 21(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2006 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.

Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. It shall be prohibited to retain on board, tranship or land such stock caught by those vessels after that date.

Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 December 2006.

For the Commission

Jörgen HOLMQUIST            

Director-General for Fisheries and Maritime Affairs

----

(1)OJ L 358, 31.12.2002, p. 59.

(2)OJ L 261, 20.10.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 768/2005 (OJ L 128, 21.5.2005, p. 1).

(3)OJ L 16, 20.1.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1642/2006 (OJ L 308, 8.11.2006, p. 5).

----

ANNEX

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title: Needto know
 
SuDoc Number:E 1.2:N 28/
Item Number:0429-A (online)
CGP System Number:000616557
 
2006 January
2005 May
2004 November | April
2003 November | April | January
2002 July | April | January
2001 October | July | January
2000 October
 
 
September 13, 2017**
EXHIBIT 32.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Annual Report  of DNA Precious Metals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K A-1 for the period ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




3.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.









Date: December 10,  2014
By: /s/ James ChandikJames ChandikChief Executive Officer
(logo)Rialto 

         CAPITAL

 

 

**2017 AnnualStatement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)**

 

Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of May1, 2016 by and among CCRE Commercial Mortgage Securities, L.P. as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto CapitalAdvisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as OperatingAdvisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, U.S. Bank National Association asTrustee, Certificate Administrator and Paying Agent, and U.S. Bank NationalAssociation as Custodian, relating to the CFCRE 2016-C4 Mortgage Trust,Commercial Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2016-C4 **(CFCRE2016-C4)**

               

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.     Allservicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under thePooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2.      Areview of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer forthe period of January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “ReportingPeriod”), under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under mysupervision.

 

3.     Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and ServicingAgreement, in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period and ifthere has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any materialrespect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specificallyidentified herein. 

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/ Adam Singer                                              Date: March 1, 2018

     Adam Singer,Managing Director
# Official Journal C 188/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 188 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6510 May 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 188

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6510 May 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| | Corrigendum to Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006) (2022/C 131/05) ( OJ C 131, 24.3.2022 ) | 1 |

Contents

page

Corrigenda

Corrigendum to Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006) (2022/C 131/05) ( OJ C 131, 24.3.2022 )

( OJ C 131, 24.3.2022 )

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

Corrigenda

| 10.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 188/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 188/1

---

Corrigendum to Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006) (2022/C 131/05)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 131 of 24 March 2022
  )

(2022/C 188/01)

On page 5, in the second column of the table:

for:

‘27 March 2022’,

read:

‘17 March 2022’.

---