alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-20082

(Summary Calendar)

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN D. GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(USDC No. H-95-CR-58-1)

- - - - - - - - - -

February 19, 1997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Juan D. Gonzalez appeals his conviction and sentence for

aiding and abetting the possession of heroin in violation of

21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C). Gonzalez argues that 1) the district

court erred in determining the drug quantity attributable to him as

relevant conduct for sentencing purposes; 2) the district court

erred in enhancing his base offense level for his role in the

offense; 3) the district court abused its discretion in refusing to
2

allow him to withdraw his guilty plea; and 4) his counsel rendered

ineffective assistance.

The district court did not clearly err in calculating the

quantity of drugs involved for sentencing purposes. See United

States v. Mergerson, 4 F.3d 337, 345 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied,

510 U.S. 1198 (1994). The district court did not clearly err in

finding that Gonzalez played an aggravating role in the offense

pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c). United States v. Narvaez, 38 F.3d

162, 166 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1803 (1995).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying

Gonzalez’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. United States v.

Bounds, 943 F.2d 541, 543 (5th Cir. 1991). Because the record is

not developed on the merits of Gonzalez’s ineffective-assistanceof-counsel claim, this court declines to address it. United States

v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484

U.S. 1075 (1988). 

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the June 30, 1998 condensed consolidated balance sheet, condensed consolidated 
statement of income for the six months ended June 30, 1998, and the notes 
thereto, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         93,402
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                  82,406
<ALLOWANCES>                                    4,328
<INVENTORY>                                    88,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0<F1> 
<PP&E>                                      3,072,955
<DEPRECIATION>                              1,369,120
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              2,208,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0<F1>
<BONDS>                                       886,840
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      106,689
<OTHER-SE>                                    506,210
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                2,208,243
<SALES>                                       124,588 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              425,574<F2>
<CGS>                                         104,591     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 263,730 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             36,363
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                95,335
<INCOME-TAX>                                   37,436
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            57,899
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   57,899
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
<FN>

<F1> The Company issues financial statements utilizing a non-classified balance
     sheet.

<F2> The Company's revenues are derived primarily from railcar leasing.

<F3> The Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 170/2005

of 31 January 2005         

fixing the aid for tomatoes for processing for the 2005/06 marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the markets in processed fruit and vegetable products (1), and in particular Article 6(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 2005/06 marketing year, the aid for tomatoes under Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 shall be:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 January 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 29. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 386/2004 (OJ L 64, 2.3.2004, p. 25).

(2)OJ L 218, 30.8.2003, p. 14. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2169/2004 (OJ L 371, 18.12.2004, p. 18).

(3)OJ L 68, 6.3.2004, p. 12.

----
[4910-13-P]

- I



## '" .~ left andright wings between wing rib numbers 8 (wing station 387) and 9 (wing station 777-200LR and -300ER series airplanes. This AD requires doing ahigh frequency eddy 414.5), and related investigative and corrective actions ifnecessary. This AD results fro reports ofcracks emanating from the keyway ofthe 

### fuel tank access door cutout ofthe current inspection forcracking ofthe keyway ofthe 

### fueltank access door cutout on the Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. Federal Aviation Administration

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 777-200LR and -300ER Serie

SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) forcertain Model (Docket Np. FAA-lOID-Ol80; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-259-AD; Amendmen 

## Ilc33'1 39-**; AD **) 

## ;I.

DID- I:' -

## 03 RIN 2120-AA64 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 14 CFR Part 39

lower wing skin between wing rib numbers 8and 9. We are issuing this AD toprevent UTl>'G~YMIlOL loss ofthe lower wing skin load path, which could cause catastrophic structural failure NITIAW;I~I() the wing. DATES: This AD is effective [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. The Director ofthe Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of n: certain publication listed in the AD asof [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE 

### 0 PUBLICATION INTHE FEDERAL REGISTER]. .~ ADDRESSES: For senrice information identified inthis AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P. O. Box 3707, Me
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

WILLIE MAPP,

Petitioner,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2:12-CV-1039

JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

Respondent. MAGISTRATE JUDGE TERENCE P. KEMP

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the OPINION and ORDER filed August 20, 2013, JUDGMENT is

hereby entered DISMISSING this action.

Date: August 20, 2013 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-01039-EAS-TPK Doc #: 25 Filed: 08/20/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND RETAINED EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    Apr-03-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<CASH>                               76,566   
<SECURITIES>                         74,227   
<RECEIVABLES>                        28,389   
<ALLOWANCES>                          2,082     
<INVENTORY>                          44,403   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    230,245   
<PP&E>                              168,638   
<DEPRECIATION>                       82,631   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      502,156   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                56,820   
<BONDS>                               7,500   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             34,231   
<OTHER-SE>                          372,633   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        502,156   
<SALES>                              74,200   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     74,200   
<CGS>                                35,384   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        21,332   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     (1,956)   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         45  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       91  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      19,349   
<INCOME-TAX>                          7,024   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  12,325   
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         12,325   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .25  
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .25  
        

</TABLE>
```

[104th Congress Public Law 202]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ202.104]

[[Page 110 STAT. 2871]]

Public Law 104-202
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in Jackson, 
  Mississippi, as the ``G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery Department of Veterans 
    Affairs Medical Center''. <<NOTE:  Sept. 24, 1996 -  [S. 1669]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER, 
            JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI.

    (a) Name.--The Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in 
Jackson, Mississippi, shall be known and designated as the ``G.V. 
(Sonny) Montgomery Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center''. Any 
reference to such medical center in any law, regulation, map, document, 
record, or other paper of the United States shall be considered to be a 
reference to the G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery Department of Veterans Affairs 
Medical Center.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) shall take effect at noon on 
January 3, 1997.

    Approved September 24, 1996.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1669:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):
            Sept. 10, considered and passed Senate.
            Sept. 11, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Torotel,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Dale H. Sizemore, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Dale H. Sizemore, Jr. |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   |   |
|                           |   |   |
|                           |   |   |
| Dale H. Sizemore, Jr.          |   |
| Chief Executive Officer        |   |
| December 10, 2006              |   |

 

 

|   |
|--------|

 

----
```

[Federal Register: June 23, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 120)]
[Notices]               
[Page 35764]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23jn10-43]                         

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================

[[Page 35764]]

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

 
Agenda and Notice of Public Meetings of the Massachusetts 
Advisory Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, that planning and briefing meetings of the 
Massachusetts Advisory Committee will convene from 9:30 a.m. on 
Tuesday, July 20, 2010, at the Lawrence Main Library, 51 Lawrence 
Street, Lawrence, Massachusetts 01841. The purpose of the planning and 
briefing meeting is to examine civil rights issues in Lawrence, MA. The 
purpose of the planning meeting is to discuss the Committee's next 
steps.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by Thursday, August 
19, 2010. The address is: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Eastern 
Regional Office, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Suite 740, Washington, DC 
20425. Persons wishing to e-mail their comments, or who desire 
additional information should contact the Eastern Regional Office at 
202-376-7533 or by e-mail to: ero@usccr.gov.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations 
of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, June 18, 2010.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2010-15171 Filed 6-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
Searched for **http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/UserFiles/works/pdfs/tn505.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/UserFiles/works/pdfs/tn505.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### Koscherak Bros., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6730.

Entry No. 700179, etc.

Invoices dated Birmingham, England, June 1944, etc.

Certified June 1944, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 6, 1944, etc.

(Decided January 9, 1947)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, .for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id: Series title:**  **Labor force status: Type of data:**  **Age: Years:**  **Year Qtr1**  **Qtr2 Qtr3**  **Qtr4 Annual**  **2011** 110763 Employed full time (persons who usually work Number in thousands 16 years and over 2011 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value** LNU02500000Q **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Employed, Usually W ork Full Time

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:06:29 PM)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 262 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 262

  Condemning the statements of former Education Secretary William J. 
                                Bennett.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 30, 2005

 Mr. Lautenberg (for himself, Mr. Reid, Mr. Corzine, Ms. Mikulski, Ms. 
 Landrieu, and Mr. Schumer) submitted the following resolution; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Condemning the statements of former Education Secretary William J. 
                                Bennett.

Whereas William J. Bennett served as chairman of the National Endowment for the 
        Humanities from 1981 to 1985;
Whereas William J. Bennett served as Secretary of Education from 1985 to 1988;
Whereas William J. Bennett served as Director of the Office of National Drug 
        Control Policy from 1989 to 1990; and
Whereas on September 28, 2005, William J. Bennett stated the following on Salem 
        Radio Network's Bill Bennett's Morning in America: ``[I] do know that 
        it's true that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could--if that were 
        your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and 
        your crime rate would go down. That would be an impossible, ridiculous, 
        and morally reprehensible thing to do, but your crime rate would go 
        down.'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,
    Section 1. That the Senate strongly condemns William J. Bennett's 
reprehensible statements of September 28, 2005.
    Sec. 2. That the Senate believes that such statements are 
unbecoming of a former Cabinet Secretary.
                                 <all>
```
JAMES BARBOUR

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2068

Opinion filed November 9, 2016.

Petition for Belated Appeal

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

James Barbour, pro se

, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General,

Tallahassee , for Responde nt.

PER CURIAM.

The petition seeking belated appeal is denied on the merits.

WOLF, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
2007 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

9-6-2007

In Re: Shemonsky

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 07-3093

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In Re: Shemonsky " (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 464.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/464
CLD-337 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

NOS. 07-3093, 07-3104, & 07-3105

________________

IN RE: MICHAEL R. SHEMONSKY,

 Appellant

MICHAEL G. OLEYAR, JR.,

 Trustee

____________________________________

On Appeal From the United States District Court

For the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civ. Nos. 07-cv-00765, 07-cv-00766, & 07-cv-00806)

District Judge: Honorable Malcolm Muir

_______________________________________

Submitted For Possible Dismissal as Moot

August 16, 2007

BEFORE: RENDELL, SMITH and JORDAN, CIRCUIT JUDGES

(Filed: September 6, 2007)

_______________________

 OPINION

_______________________

PER CURIAM

Michael Shemonsky appeals the District Court’s order denying his motions to

proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Shemonsky filed notices of appeal from the District

Court’s order deeming his appeals from three Bankruptcy Court orders withdrawn. These

appeals were docketed at C.A. Nos. 07-2784, 07-2790, and 07-2791. Shemonsky filed
motions to proceed in forma pauperis in the District Court for each appeal. By order

entered July 10, 2007, the District Court denied the motions without prejudice to

Shemonsky filing a motion to proceed in forma pauperis with this Court. Shemonsky

then filed notices of appeal from the District Court’s July 10, 2007 order which were

docketed at C.A. Nos. 07-3093, 07-3104, and 07-3105. 

By order entered July 18, 2007, the Clerk granted Shemonsky’s motions to

proceed in forma pauperis in the appeals at C.A. Nos. 07-2784, 07-2790, and 07-2971. 

Because Shemonsky has now been granted the relief he sought in the District Court, the

appeals at C.A. Nos. 07-3093, 07-3104, and 07-3105 are moot. Accordingly, we will

dismiss the appeals.

2