alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Steven Sammet,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 2:12-cv-884

Carolyn W. Colvin,

Acting Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the court for consideration of the

August 15, 2013, report and recommendation of the United States

magistrate judge to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §636(b). The magistrate judge recommended that the decision

of the Commissioner be affirmed.

The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties

that failure to object to the report and recommendation within

fourteen days of the report “will result in a waiver of the right

to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to

appeal the judgment of the District Court.” Doc. 18, p. 22. The

time period for filing objections to the report and recommendation

has expired, and no party has objected to the report and

recommendation.

The court has reviewed the report and recommendation of the

magistrate judge. Noting that no objections have been filed and

that the time for filing such objections has expired, the court

adopts the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc.

18). Accordingly, the court affirms the decision of the

Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiff’s applications

Case: 2:12-cv-00854-JLG-MRA Doc #: 19 Filed: 09/26/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
for social security disability and supplemental security income

benefits. The clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the

Commissioner of Social Security.

Date: September 26, 2013 s/James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge 

2

Case: 2:12-cv-00854-JLG-MRA Doc #: 19 Filed: 09/26/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
OoT-'^sr- Qoo a - /rsV? 

^ 

ALASKA JUNEAU 

AERONAUTICS. INC. 

August 7, 2010 

Dennis DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation, S"* Floor, Room W86-472 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

Although our original proposal to provide air service for Athens, GA (OST 2002-11348) 

was 12 direct flights per week to Nashville, TN, the community expressed to us that they 

would prefer service to Atlanta, GA. Upon review of their request, we are able to offer 

that routing instead of what we originally proposed at the same frequency and subsidy 

amount. 

Please contact me with any questions or comments. 

Sincerely, 

;^^/ ^ _ 

Rob McKmney 

President 

Alaska Juneau Aeronautics, Inc. 

d/b/a SeaPort Airlines 

7505 NE Airport Way • Portland, OR 97218 • 971-340-1700
Order entered June 27, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00127 - CV TERRY JOHNSON, Appellant

V. MAI DINH, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 18 - 05233 - E



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s June 26, 2019 motion for an extension of time to file his brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion. We ORDER the brief tendered to this Court on June 26, 2019 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
BATHYMETRIC MAP

BEAUFORT SEA
HARRISON BAY

690000m£, |

(981 NR 5-2 ~P

989 |

| 990

13 14

HARRISON BAY NRI5-

21

7870000m.N,

TESHEKPUK NR 5.3 ~

/ KOGRU

TB]OITTN

a
N

€9UN LNIOd AHOIAS

Eskims
~ RIVER —

7770000.

Base map information including bathymetry was compiled by the National
Ocean Service (NOS). Bathymetry was compiled from NOS hydrographic
surveys supplemented by hydrographic information from other sources
(see index). NOS hydrographic survey data complies with International
Hydrographic Organization (IHO) Special Publication 44 accuracy
standards or those used at the date of the surveys. This information is not
intended for navigational purposes.

Bathymetric Contour Interval: 10 meters to maximum depth, supplemented
by 2 meter intervals

Datum: Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW).

Universal Transverse Mercator Grid. Zone 5; 10,000.meter ticks (--) are
shown inside the neatline.

Protraction Diagram data shown in a subdued (screened) black was com
piled by the Minerals Management Service (MMS].

THIS MAP IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal leasing purposes, for
such purposes use the MMS Quter Continental Shelf Official Protraction
Diagrams. .

Heavy line(s) indicate limits of these protraction

diagrams
HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMATION
survey } survey | survey |. suavey
number | “bare” | “Soate | une sPacing
(aur. mices)
we7as | i981 | 10000 | osae
eyst7 | test | 120000 | 03-20
Hjeta | test. | 120000 | — bs-e0
Wyse | asstsa | iaoeoo | Oca
tiojest | “aes2” | t:aoo00 | ds-60
fgose | 38s | taolooo | be70
races | tess | tooo | ozs
NOS CHART 16066 DEC. 25,1982 148.078

OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MAP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE

1984

Produced at Washington, D.C.
for

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE

TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION
Scale 1:250,000
1

20 Statute Miles

5 ° 5 i 15
5 ° 5 10 15 20 25 30 Kilometers
————a——
5 oO 5 10

15 Nautical Miles
7

7

NATIONAL OCEAN. SERVICE.

spitoom |

150°

1253°__HYDROGRAPHIC_SURVEY INDEX

4.7922) 6.16086 oem, Holiday Area
% on

71°

153% photographic copies of the above and prior surveys
may be obtained, at the cost of reproduction, by
addressing the Director (N/CG243), National
Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, Rockville, Maryland 20852

70°
150°

HARRISON BAY
NOS NR 5-4(OCS)

INDEX TO

“ADJOINING SHEETS
156° 17s 0

|ARRISON

NR

| 69°
147°

|
|

Wl 40 3903 HOUISOd
# Official Journal C 212/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 212 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6224 June 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 212

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6224 June 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 212/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| | European Food Safety Authority |
| 2019/C 212/02 | Networking of organisations operating in the fields within the European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA’s) mission | 2 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 212/01

Euro exchange rates

1

European Food Safety Authority

2019/C 212/02

Networking of organisations operating in the fields within the European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA’s) mission

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 212/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9404 — Goldman Sachs/B&B Hotels) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 3 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2019/C 212/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9404 — Goldman Sachs/B&B Hotels) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EE-PS-04-001 COMMENT 01.1

#1.1 

Letter of Invitation 

Dear Stakeholders: 

The Building Technologies Program is beginning our Appliance Standards Rulemaking 

process for establishing priorities for Fiscal Year 2005. We would like to invite you to 

attend an informal public meeting here at the Department of Energy in Washington on 

Wednesday, June 9, 2004, to discuss the proposed priorities. The meeting will be held in 

Room lE-245 of the Forrestal Building, beginning at 9:00 a.m. 

We have completed the FY 2005 Preliminary Priority-Setting Summary Report and 

Actions Proposed and have posted it for your review at the following website: 

http://www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance _standards/ 

The report includes the Proposed Fiscal Year 2005 Priorities for the Appliance Standards 

Rulemaking Process (Memorandum with Proposed Priorities), the FY 2005 Technical 

Support Document (Appendix A), revised data sheets for existing and potential new 

covered products (Appendix B), data sheets for non-covered products (Appendix C- most 

unrevised since the FY 2003 priority-setting), and Excel spreadsheets. 

You can find details for attending the meeting and submitting comments at the above 

website, or in the April 30, 2004, Federal Register notice attached below. If you cannot 

attend the meeting, please provide comments by July 9, 2004. 

Sincerely, 

Barbara Twigg 

Project Manager 

Building Technologies Program
# C_2008157EN.01001901.xml

| 21.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 157/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 157/19

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 June 2008

(2008/C 157/05)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5610 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 167,83 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4580 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78965 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3980 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6165 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 125,32 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0435 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,170 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 238,55 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7028 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,3660 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6745 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,350 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9140 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6352 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5805 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,1853 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0448 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1319 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 607,44 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,4622 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,7398 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2477 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 454,86 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0826 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,191 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,7740 |
| THB | Thai baht | 52,005 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5048 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,0998 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5610

JPY

Japanese yen

167,83

DKK

Danish krone

7,4580

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78965

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3980

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6165

ISK

Iceland króna

125,32

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0435

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,170

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

238,55

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7028

PLN

Polish zloty

3,3660

RON

Romanian leu

3,6745

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,350

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9140

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6352

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5805

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,1853

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0448

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1319

KRW

South Korean won

1 607,44

ZAR

South African rand

12,4622

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,7398

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2477

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 454,86

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0826

PHP

Philippine peso

69,191

RUB

Russian rouble

36,7740

THB

Thai baht

52,005

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5048

MXN

Mexican peso

16,0998

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors, PNCFinancial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland LoanServices, a division of PNC Bank, National Association (“Midland”or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for alltransactions serviced on the *Enterprise!* Loan Management System (the“Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C),1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedasset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing ofselected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that Midland complied with the aforementioned applicableservicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for thePlatform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 17, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816)218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Bruce M. Zorich, Chief Executive Officer of United Components, Inc. certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Components, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which the report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date:August 14, 2006         By: /s/ BRUCE M. ZORICH    Name:  Bruce M. Zorich    Title:  Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register: October 28, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 208)]
[Notices]               
[Page 66362]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28oc10-31]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

 
Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date and Time:  Friday, November 5, 2010; 9:30 a.m. EDT.

Place:  624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

Meeting Agenda

    This meeting is open to the public.

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Program Planning
     Approval of Project Outline and Discovery Plan for FY 2011 
Enforcement Report
     Discussion of Possible Briefing Topics for FY 2011
     Update on Status of Briefing on Disparate Impact in School 
Discipline Policies
III. Management & Operations
     Expiration of Commissioner Terms
IV. State Advisory Committee Issues
     Wisconsin SAC
V. Approval of Minutes of October 29 Meeting
VI. Adjourn

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

    Dated: October 26, 2010.
Martin Dannenfelser,
Staff Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-27451 Filed 10-26-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
USGSHomeContactUSGSSearchUSGS

USGS-NPS-NASAEAARLTopography

----

To view a tile as a PDF file, download a free copyof Adobe Reader:    

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPoliciesand Notices

U.S.Department of the Interior | U.S.Geological SurveyURL: *http://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/of/2007/1176/start.html*For more information, contact: FeedbackMaintained by Publishing Service Center Page Last Modified: Wednesday, 07-Dec-2016 20:33:27 EST

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 3, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 03-30567

Summary Calendar

_____________________

DEBORAH E. HARMON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SAINT GOBAIN CONTAINERS, L.L.C., formerly known as

Ball Foster Container Company, L.L.C.

Defendant-Appellee.

__________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 00-CV-1701

_________________________________________________________________

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Deborah Harmon filed a complaint alleging that her employer,

Saint Gobain Containers, Inc. (“SG”), discriminated against her in

violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the

Louisiana Employment Discrimination Law. Specifically, Harmon

argued that she was actually disabled and that SG discriminated

against her on the basis of such disability, and, in the

alternative, that she was not actually disabled, but that SG

regarded her as disabled in violation of federal and state law.
1The district court also found that Harmon failed to file an

administrative charge on her retaliation claim (which is necessary

to sustain a lawsuit in federal court), and thus dismissed that

claim. Harmon does not appeal this determination.

2

She also argued that SG unlawfully retaliated against her for her

complaints of its allegedly discriminatory treatment, in violation

of the ADA.

The district court, finding no genuine issue of material fact,

granted summary judgment to SG on the discrimination claim, which

Harmon now appeals.1 Harmon also appeals three non-dispositive

motions relating to docket management and supervision of discovery.

We find, for the reasons articulated by the district court,

that Harmon was not disabled as a matter of law and that SG did not

regard her as disabled under the ADA’s definition of that term.

See 42 U.S.C. § 12102(2) (West 2004); Sutton v. United Airlines,

Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 477-78 (1999). We also find -- to the extent

this issue is not waived by Harmon’s scant briefing of it -- that

the district court did not abuse its ample discretion in ruling on

the non-dispositive motions. See, e.g., Andrade v. Chojnacki, 338

F.3d 448, 454 (5th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, the judgment of the

district court is

AFFIRMED.