# Official Journal C 347/2011

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.347.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 347 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5426 November 2011 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.347.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 347

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5426 November 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2011/C 347/01 | Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 340, 19.11.2011 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2011/C 347/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 340, 19.11.2011

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2011/C 347/02 | Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2011 (references for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division, and the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court)) — Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm Chamberlain, Michael Madden, SR Leisure Ltd, Philip George Charles Houghton, Derek Owen (C-403/08) and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (C-429/08) (Satellite broadcasting — Broadcasting of football matches — Reception of the broadcast by means of satellite decoder cards — Satellite decoder cards lawfully placed on the market in one Member State and used in another Member State — Prohibition on marketing and use in a Member State — Visualisation of broadcasts in disregard of the exclusive rights granted — Copyright — Television broadcasting right — Exclusive licences to broadcast in a single Member State — Freedom to provide services — Article 56 TFEU — Competition — Article 101 TFEU — Restriction of competition by object — Protection of services based on conditional access — Illicit device — Directive 98/84/EC — Directive 2001/29/EC — Reproduction of works within the memory of a satellite decoder and on a television screen — Exception to the reproduction right — Communication of works to the public in public houses — Directive 93/83/EEC) | 2 |
| 2011/C 347/03 | Case C-302/09: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2011 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — State Aid — Aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia — Reductions in social security contributions — Withdrawal) | 3 |
| 2011/C 347/04 | Case C-493/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2011 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 63 TFEU and Article 40 of the EEA Agreement — Free movement of capital — Foreign and national pension funds — Corporation tax — Dividends — Exemption — Difference in treatment) | 4 |
| 2011/C 347/05 | Case C-381/10: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat Wien — Austria) — Astrid Preissl KEG v Landeshauptmann von Wien (Industrial Policy — Food hygiene — Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 — Installation of a washbasin in the toilets of an establishment which sells food) | 4 |
| 2011/C 347/06 | Case C-382/10: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat Wien (Austria)) — Erich Albrecht, Thomas Neumann, Van-Ly Sundara, Alexander Svoboda, Stefan Toth v Landeshauptmann von Wien (Industrial Policy — Food hygiene — Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 — Self-service retail of bread and bakery products) | 5 |
| 2011/C 347/07 | Case C-421/10: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany)) — Finanzamt Deggendorf v Markus Stoppelkamp, acting in his capacity as insolvency administrator of the estate of Harald Raab (VAT — Sixth Directive — Article 21(1)(b) — Determination of the place of reference for tax purposes — Services provided by a supplier residing in the same country as the customer but having established the seat of his economic activity in another country — Concept of ‘taxable person established abroad’) | 5 |
| 2011/C 347/08 | Case C-443/10: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif de Limoges — France) — Philippe Bonnarde v Agence de Services et de Paiement (Free movement of goods — Quantitative restrictions — Measures having equivalent effect — Importation, by a person resident in a Member State, of a vehicle already registered in another Member State — Ecological subsidy — Conditions — Registration certificate attesting to the nature of the demonstration vehicle) | 6 |
| 2011/C 347/09 | Case C-506/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Waldshut-Tiengen — Landwirtschaftsgericht — Germany) — Rico Graf, Rudolf Engel v Landratsamt Waldshut — Landwirtschaftsamt (Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Equal treatment — Self-employed frontier workers — Agricultural lease — Agricultural structure — Legislation of a Member State enabling an objection to be made to the contract if the goods produced in national territory by the self employed Swiss frontier farmers are intended to be exported, free of duty, to Switzerland) | 6 |
| 2011/C 347/10 | Case C-364/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság (Budapest, Hungary) lodged on 11 July 2011 — Abed El Karem El Kott Mostafa and Others v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal, Hivatal, ENSZ Menekültügyi Főbiztosság | 7 |
| 2011/C 347/11 | Case C-409/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Metropolitan Court lodged on 1 August 2011 — Gábor Csonka and Others v Hungarian State | 7 |
| 2011/C 347/12 | Case C-438/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 26 August 2011 — Lagura Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen | 8 |
| 2011/C 347/13 | Case C-439/11 P: Appeal brought on 25 August 2011 by Ziegler SA against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 16 June 2011 in Case T-199/08 Ziegler v Commission | 8 |
| 2011/C 347/14 | Case C-444/11 P: Appeal brought on 30 August 2011 by Team Relocations NV and others against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 16 June 2011 in Joined Cases T-204/08 and T-212/08, Team Relocations NV and others v Commission | 9 |
| 2011/C 347/15 | Case C-451/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Giessen (Germany) lodged on 1 September 2011 — Natthaya Dülger v District of Wetterau | 10 |
| 2011/C 347/16 | Case C-455/11 P: Appeal brought on 2 September 2011 by Solvay SA against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 16 June 2011 in Case T-186/06: Solvay SA v European Commission | 11 |
| 2011/C 347/17 | Case C-466/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Brescia (Italy) lodged on 9 September 2011 — Gennaro Currà and Others v The Italian Republic | 12 |
| 2011/C 347/18 | Case C-467/11 P: Appeal brought on 9 September 2011 by Audi AG and Volkswagen AG against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 6 July 2011 in Case T-318/09 Audi AG, Volkswagen AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) | 12 |
| 2011/C 347/19 | Case C-473/11: Action brought on 16 September 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands | 13 |
| 2011/C 347/20 | Case C-477/11 P: Appeal brought on 19 September 2011 by Sepracor Pharmaceuticals (Ireland) Ltd against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 4 July 2011 in Case T-275/09: Sepracor Pharmaceuticals (Ireland) Ltd v European Commission | 13 |
| 2011/C 347/21 | Case C-483/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Tribunalul Argeș (Romania) lodged on 20 September 2011 — Andrei Emilian Boncea, Filofteia Catrinel Boncea, Adriana Boboc, Cornelia Mihăilescu v Romanian State represented by the Ministry for Public Finance | 14 |
| 2011/C 347/22 | Case C-484/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Tribunalul Argeș (Romania) lodged on 20 September 2011 — Mariana Budan v Romanian State — Ministerul Finanțelor Publice represented by the Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Argeș | 15 |
| 2011/C 347/23 | Case C-487/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 22 September 2011 — Laimonis Treimanis v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests | 15 |
| 2011/C 347/24 | Case C-489/11 P: Appeal brought on 23 September 2011 by Mitsubishi Electric Corp. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 12 July 2011 in Case T-133/07: Mitsubishi Electric Corp. v European Commission | 15 |
| 2011/C 347/25 | Case C-492/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Mercato San Severino (Italy) lodged on 26 September 2011 — Ciro Di Donna v Società imballaggi metallici Salerno Srl (SIMSA) | 16 |
| 2011/C 347/26 | Case C-493/11 P: Appeal brought on 23 September 2011 by United Technologies Corp. against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Case T-141/07: United Technologies Corp. v European Commission | 17 |
| 2011/C 347/27 | Case C-494/11 P: Appeal brought on 23 September 2011 by Otis Luxembourg Sàrl, formerly General Technic-Otis Sàrl, Otis SA, Otis BV, Otis Elevator Company, Otis GmbH & Co. OHG against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Case T-141/07: Otis Luxembourg Sàrl, formerly General Technic-Otis Sàrl, Otis SA, Otis BV, Otis Elevator Company, Otis GmbH & Co. OHG v European Commission | 18 |
| 2011/C 347/28 | Case C-498/11 P: Appeal brought on 27 September 2011 by Toshiba Corp. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 12 July 2011 in Case T-113/07: Toshiba Corp. v European Commission | 18 |
| 2011/C 347/29 | Case C-501/11 P: Appeal brought on 28 September 2011 by Schindler Holding Ltd, Schindler Management AG, Schindler SA, Schindler Sàrl, Schindler Liften BV and Schindler Deutschland Holding GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Case T-138/07 Schindler Holding Ltd and Others v European Commission, supported by the Council of the European Union | 19 |
| 2011/C 347/30 | Case C-502/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 30 September 2011 — Vivaio dei Molini Azienda Agricola Porro Savoldi ss v Autorità per la Vigilanza sui Contratti Pubblici di lavori, servizi e forniture | 20 |
| 2011/C 347/31 | Case C-503/11 P: Appeal brought on 30 September 2011 by ThyssenKrupp Elevator (CENE) GmbH, formerly ThyssenKrupp Aufzüge GmbH, and ThyssenKrupp Fahrtreppen GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Joined Cases T-144/07, T-147/07, T-148/07, T-149/07, T-150/07 and T-154/07 ThyssenKrupp Liften Ascenseurs and Others v European Commission | 21 |
| 2011/C 347/32 | Case C-504/11 P: Appeal brought on 30 September 2011 by ThyssenKrupp Ascenseurs Luxemburg Sàrl against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Joined Cases T-144/07, T-147/07, T-148/07, T-149/07, T-150/07 and T-154/07 ThyssenKrupp Liften Ascenseurs and Others v European Commission | 22 |
| 2011/C 347/33 | Case C-505/11 P: Appeal brought on 30 September 2011 by ThyssenKrupp Elevator AG against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Joined Cases T-144/07, T-147/07, T-148/07, T-149/07, T-150/07 and T-154/07 ThyssenKrupp Liften Ascenseurs and Others v European Commission | 23 |
| 2011/C 347/34 | Case C-506/11 P: Appeal brought on 30 September 2011 by ThyssenKrupp AG against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Joined Cases T-144/07, T-147/07, T-148/07, T-149/07, T-150/07 and T-154/07 ThyssenKrupp Liften Ascenseurs and Others v Commission | 24 |
| 2011/C 347/35 | Case C-512/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Työtuomioistuin (Finland) lodged on 3 October 2011 — Terveys- ja sosiaalialan neuvottelujärjestö TSN ry v Terveyspalvelualan Liitto ry, Mehiläinen Oy | 25 |
| 2011/C 347/36 | Case C-513/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Työtuomioistuin (Finland) lodged on 3 October 2011 — Ylemmät Toimihenkilöt YTN ry v Teknologiateollisuus ry, Nokia Siemens Networks Oy | 25 |
| | General Court |
| 2011/C 347/37 | Case T-38/05: Judgment of the General Court of 12 October 2011 — Agroexpansión v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Spanish market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing and market sharing — Fines — Attributability of the unlawful conduct — Maximum limit of 10 % of turnover — Deterrent effect — Equal treatment — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation) | 26 |
| 2011/C 347/38 | Case T-41/05: Judgment of the General Court of 12 October 2011 — Alliance One International v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Spanish market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing and market-sharing — Fines — Attributability of the unlawful conduct — Maximum limit of 10 % of turnover — Deterrent effect — Attenuating circumstances) | 26 |
| 2011/C 347/39 | Case T-139/06: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2011 — France v Commission (Failure to comply with a judgment of the Court of Justice finding that there has been failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Periodic penalty payment — Adoption, by the Member State, of certain measures — Request for payment — Competence of the Commission — Jurisdiction of the General Court) | 27 |
| 2011/C 347/40 | Case T-312/07: Judgment of the General Court of 12 October 2011 — Dimos Peramatos v Commission (Financial contribution granted for an environmental project — LIFE — Decision to recover in part the amount paid out — Determination of the obligations of the recipient undertaken in the financed project — Legitimate expectations — Obligation to state reasons) | 27 |
| 2011/C 347/41 | Case T-449/08: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2011 — SLV Elektronik v OHIM — Jiménez Muñoz (LINE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark LINE — Earlier national word and figurative marks Line — Partial refusal to register — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 27 |
| 2011/C 347/42 | Case T-561/08: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2011 — Gutknecht v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Health policy — Biocidal products — Establishment of a list of active substances on the market — Adoption of regulations by the Commission by virtue of Directive 98/8/EC — Causal link) | 28 |
| 2011/C 347/43 | Case T-393/09: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2011 — NEC Display Solutions Europe GmbH v OHIM — Nokia (NaViKey) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark NaViKey — Earlier Community word mark NAVI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Breach of the duty to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) | 28 |
| 2011/C 347/44 | Case T-439/09: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2011 — Purvis v Parliament (Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Additional pension scheme — Refusal to grant a voluntary additional pension in part in the form of a lump sum — Plea of illegality — Acquired rights — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality) | 28 |
| 2011/C 347/45 | Case T-53/10: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2011 — Reisenthel v OHIM — Dynamic Promotion (Hampers, crates and baskets) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity by the Invalidity Division — Notification of the Invalidity Division’s decision by fax — Appeal before the Board of Appeal — Written statement setting out the grounds of appeal — Period for submission — Admissibility of the appeal — Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Correction of a decision — Article 39 of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 — General principle of law authorising the withdrawal of an unlawful decision) | 29 |
| 2011/C 347/46 | Case T-87/10: Judgment of the General Court of 11 October 2011 — Chestnut Medical Technologies v OHIM (PIPELINE) (Community trade mark — Application for registration of the Community word mark PIPELINE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) | 29 |
| 2011/C 347/47 | Case T-213/10: Judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2011 — P v Parliament (Appeal — Civil Service — Temporary staff — Dismissal — Breakdown of trust — Statement of reasons — Distortion of the evidence) | 29 |
| 2011/C 347/48 | Case T-224/10: Judgment of the General Court of 12 October 2011 — Association belge des consommateurs test-achats v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Belgian energy market — Decision declaring a merger to be compatible with the common market — Commitments given during the initial phase of the investigation — Decision refusing the partial referral of the merger investigation to the national authorities — Action for annulment — Consumer association — Interest in bringing proceedings — Failure to initiate the in-depth review procedure — Procedural rights — Inadmissibility) | 30 |
| 2011/C 347/49 | Case T-304/10: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2011 — dm-drogerie markt v OHIM — Semtee (caldea) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the Community figurative mark caldea — Earlier international word mark BALEA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 30 |
| 2011/C 347/50 | Case T-277/07: Order of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Secure Computing v OHIM — Investrónica (SECUREOS) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate) | 31 |
| 2011/C 347/51 | Case T-341/08: Order of the General Court of 30 June 2011 — Hess Group v OHIM — Coloma Navarro (COLOMÉ) (Community trade mark — Application for a declaration of invalidity — Agreement and withdrawal of application — No need to adjudicate) | 31 |
| 2011/C 347/52 | Case T-96/09: Order of the General Court of 28 September 2011 — UCAPT v Council (Action for annulment — Common agricultural policy — Support schemes for farmers — Production aid for tobacco — Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 — Not of individual concern — Inadmissible) | 31 |
| 2011/C 347/53 | Case T-128/09: Order of the General Court of 3 October 2011 — Meridiana and Meridiana fly v Commission (State aid — Action for annulment — Applicants’ failure to act — No need to adjudicate) | 32 |
| 2011/C 347/54 | Case T-297/10: Order of the General Court of 11 October 2011 — DBV v Commission (Action for annulment — Dumping — Imports of certain aluminium wheels originating in China — Rights of defence — Calculation of normal value — Proportionality — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law) | 32 |
| 2011/C 347/55 | Case T-149/11: Order of the General Court of 12 October 2011 — GS v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Regulation (EU) No 1210/2010 — Right of the Member States to refuse the reimbursement of euro coins unfit for circulation — No direct concern — Inadmissible) | 32 |
| 2011/C 347/56 | Case T-206/11: Order of the General Court of 28 September 2011 — Complex v OHIM — Kajometal (KX) (Community trade mark — Refusal of registration — Withdrawal of application for registration — No need to adjudicate) | 33 |
| 2011/C 347/57 | Case T-346/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 30 September 2011 — Gollnisch v Parliament (Interim measures — Waiving of the immunity of a member of the European Parliament — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency) | 33 |
| 2011/C 347/58 | Case T-347/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 30 September 2011 — Gollnisch v Parliament (Interim measures — Rejection of the request for the defence of immunity for a member of the European Parliament — Application for suspension of operation — Inadmissibility) | 33 |
| 2011/C 347/59 | Case T-379/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 15 September 2011 — Hüttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann and Others v Commission (Interim relief — Environment — Allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances free of charge in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC — Setting of the product benchmarks the subject of the Commission’s decision — Application for interim measures — Admissibility — Urgency) | 33 |
| 2011/C 347/60 | Case T-381/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 15 September 2011 — Eurofer v Commission (Interim relief — Environment — Allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances free of charge in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC — Setting of the product benchmarks the subject of the Commission’s decision — Application for interim measures — Admissibility — Urgency) | 34 |
| 2011/C 347/61 | Case T-384/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 28 September 2011 — Safa Nicu Sepahan v Council (Application for interim measures — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Application for interim measures — Lack of urgency) | 34 |
| 2011/C 347/62 | Case T-395/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 30 September 2011 — Elti v Delegation of the European Union to Montenegro (Application for interim measures — Public procurement — Tendering procedure — Rejection of a tender — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Disregard of the formal requirements — Inadmissibility) | 34 |
| 2011/C 347/63 | Case T-421/11 R: Order of the judge of the General Court hearing applications for interim measures of 3 October 2011 — Qualitest FZE v Council (Application for interim measures — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Lack of urgency) | 35 |
| 2011/C 347/64 | Case T-422/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 5 October 2011 — Computer Resources International (Luxembourg) v Commission (Interim measures — Public procurement — Tendering procedure — Rejection of a tender — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Loss of opportunity — Lack of serious and irreparable damage — Lack of urgency) | 35 |
| 2011/C 347/65 | Case T-309/10: Action brought on 15 September 2011 — Klein v Commission | 35 |
| 2011/C 347/66 | Case T-489/11: Action brought on 20 September 2011 — Rousse Industry v Commission | 36 |
| 2011/C 347/67 | Case T-495/11: Action brought on 19 September 2011 — Streng v OHIM — Gismondi (PARAMETRICA) | 37 |
| 2011/C 347/68 | Case T-498/11: Action brought on 16 September 2011 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission | 37 |
| 2011/C 347/69 | Case T-503/11: Action brought on 27 September 2011 — Al-Aqsa v Council | 38 |
| 2011/C 347/70 | Case T-508/11: Action brought on 27 September 2011 — LTTE v Council | 39 |
| 2011/C 347/71 | Case T-512/11: Action brought on 24 September 2011 — Ryanair v Commission | 40 |
| 2011/C 347/72 | Case T-516/11: Action brought on 22 September 2011 — MasterCard and Others v Commission | 40 |
| 2011/C 347/73 | Case T-519/11 P: Appeal brought on 29 September 2011 by Sandro Gozi against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 20 July 2011 in Case F-116/10 Gozi v Commission | 41 |
| 2011/C 347/74 | Case T-526/11: Action brought on 3 October 2011 — Igcar Chemicals v ECHA | 41 |
| 2011/C 347/75 | Case T-538/11: Action brought on 10 October 2011 — Belgium v Commission | 42 |
| 2011/C 347/76 | Case T-540/11: Action brought on 4 October 2011 — Melkveebedrijf Overenk and Others v Commission | 42 |
| 2011/C 347/77 | Case T-234/00: Order of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Fondazione Opera S. Maria della Carità v Commission | 44 |
| 2011/C 347/78 | Case T-235/00: Order of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Codess Sociale and Others v Commission | 44 |
| 2011/C 347/79 | Case T-255/00: Order of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Ciga and Others v Commission | 44 |
| 2011/C 347/80 | Case T-266/00: Order of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Confartigianato Venezia and Others v Commission | 44 |
| 2011/C 347/81 | Case T-502/09: Order of the General Court of 11 October 2011 — Inovis v OHIM — Sonaecom (INOVIS) | 44 |
| 2011/C 347/82 | Case T-23/11: Order of the General Court of 11 October 2011 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — BA&SH (ba&sh) | 44 |
| | European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
| 2011/C 347/83 | Case F-87/11: Action brought on 13 September 2011 — ZZ v FRONTEX | 45 |
| 2011/C 347/84 | Case F-88/11: Action brought on 16 September 2011 — ZZ v Commission | 45 |
| 2011/C 347/85 | Case F-89/11: Action brought on 18 September 2011 — ZZ v Committee of the Regions | 45 |
| 2011/C 347/86 | Case F-92/11: Action brought on 23 September 2011 — ZZ v EESC | 46 |
| 2011/C 347/87 | Case F-93/11: Action brought on 23 September 2011 — ZZ v Commission | 46 |
| 2011/C 347/88 | Case F-95/11: Action brought on 28 September 2011 — ZZ v EIB | 46 |
| 2011/C 347/89 | Case F-97/11: Action brought on 3 October 2011 — ZZ v Parliament | 47 |
| 2011/C 347/90 | Case F-98/11: Action brought on 3 October 2011 — ZZ and Others v European Commission | 47 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2011/C 347/02

Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2011 (references for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division, and the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court)) — Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm Chamberlain, Michael Madden, SR Leisure Ltd, Philip George Charles Houghton, Derek Owen (C-403/08) and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (C-429/08) (Satellite broadcasting — Broadcasting of football matches — Reception of the broadcast by means of satellite decoder cards — Satellite decoder cards lawfully placed on the market in one Member State and used in another Member State — Prohibition on marketing and use in a Member State — Visualisation of broadcasts in disregard of the exclusive rights granted — Copyright — Television broadcasting right — Exclusive licences to broadcast in a single Member State — Freedom to provide services — Article 56 TFEU — Competition — Article 101 TFEU — Restriction of competition by object — Protection of services based on conditional access — Illicit device — Directive 98/84/EC — Directive 2001/29/EC — Reproduction of works within the memory of a satellite decoder and on a television screen — Exception to the reproduction right — Communication of works to the public in public houses — Directive 93/83/EEC)

2

2011/C 347/03

Case C-302/09: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2011 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — State Aid — Aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia — Reductions in social security contributions — Withdrawal)

3

2011/C 347/04

Case C-493/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2011 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 63 TFEU and Article 40 of the EEA Agreement — Free movement of capital — Foreign and national pension funds — Corporation tax — Dividends — Exemption — Difference in treatment)

4

2011/C 347/05

Case C-381/10: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat Wien — Austria) — Astrid Preissl KEG v Landeshauptmann von Wien (Industrial Policy — Food hygiene — Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 — Installation of a washbasin in the toilets of an establishment which sells food)

4

2011/C 347/06

Case C-382/10: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat Wien (Austria)) — Erich Albrecht, Thomas Neumann, Van-Ly Sundara, Alexander Svoboda, Stefan Toth v Landeshauptmann von Wien (Industrial Policy — Food hygiene — Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 — Self-service retail of bread and bakery products)

5

2011/C 347/07

Case C-421/10: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany)) — Finanzamt Deggendorf v Markus Stoppelkamp, acting in his capacity as insolvency administrator of the estate of Harald Raab (VAT — Sixth Directive — Article 21(1)(b) — Determination of the place of reference for tax purposes — Services provided by a supplier residing in the same country as the customer but having established the seat of his economic activity in another country — Concept of ‘taxable person established abroad’)

5

2011/C 347/08

Case C-443/10: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif de Limoges — France) — Philippe Bonnarde v Agence de Services et de Paiement (Free movement of goods — Quantitative restrictions — Measures having equivalent effect — Importation, by a person resident in a Member State, of a vehicle already registered in another Member State — Ecological subsidy — Conditions — Registration certificate attesting to the nature of the demonstration vehicle)

6

2011/C 347/09

Case C-506/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Waldshut-Tiengen — Landwirtschaftsgericht — Germany) — Rico Graf, Rudolf Engel v Landratsamt Waldshut — Landwirtschaftsamt (Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Equal treatment — Self-employed frontier workers — Agricultural lease — Agricultural structure — Legislation of a Member State enabling an objection to be made to the contract if the goods produced in national territory by the self employed Swiss frontier farmers are intended to be exported, free of duty, to Switzerland)

6

2011/C 347/10

Case C-364/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság (Budapest, Hungary) lodged on 11 July 2011 — Abed El Karem El Kott Mostafa and Others v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal, Hivatal, ENSZ Menekültügyi Főbiztosság

7

2011/C 347/11

Case C-409/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Metropolitan Court lodged on 1 August 2011 — Gábor Csonka and Others v Hungarian State

7

2011/C 347/12

Case C-438/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 26 August 2011 — Lagura Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen

8

2011/C 347/13

Case C-439/11 P: Appeal brought on 25 August 2011 by Ziegler SA against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 16 June 2011 in Case T-199/08 Ziegler v Commission

8

2011/C 347/14

Case C-444/11 P: Appeal brought on 30 August 2011 by Team Relocations NV and others against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 16 June 2011 in Joined Cases T-204/08 and T-212/08, Team Relocations NV and others v Commission

9

2011/C 347/15

Case C-451/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Giessen (Germany) lodged on 1 September 2011 — Natthaya Dülger v District of Wetterau

10

2011/C 347/16

Case C-455/11 P: Appeal brought on 2 September 2011 by Solvay SA against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 16 June 2011 in Case T-186/06: Solvay SA v European Commission

11

2011/C 347/17

Case C-466/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Brescia (Italy) lodged on 9 September 2011 — Gennaro Currà and Others v The Italian Republic

12

2011/C 347/18

Case C-467/11 P: Appeal brought on 9 September 2011 by Audi AG and Volkswagen AG against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 6 July 2011 in Case T-318/09 Audi AG, Volkswagen AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

12

2011/C 347/19

Case C-473/11: Action brought on 16 September 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands

13

2011/C 347/20

Case C-477/11 P: Appeal brought on 19 September 2011 by Sepracor Pharmaceuticals (Ireland) Ltd against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 4 July 2011 in Case T-275/09: Sepracor Pharmaceuticals (Ireland) Ltd v European Commission

13

2011/C 347/21

Case C-483/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Tribunalul Argeș (Romania) lodged on 20 September 2011 — Andrei Emilian Boncea, Filofteia Catrinel Boncea, Adriana Boboc, Cornelia Mihăilescu v Romanian State represented by the Ministry for Public Finance

14

2011/C 347/22

Case C-484/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Tribunalul Argeș (Romania) lodged on 20 September 2011 — Mariana Budan v Romanian State — Ministerul Finanțelor Publice represented by the Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Argeș

15

2011/C 347/23

Case C-487/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 22 September 2011 — Laimonis Treimanis v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

15

2011/C 347/24

Case C-489/11 P: Appeal brought on 23 September 2011 by Mitsubishi Electric Corp. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 12 July 2011 in Case T-133/07: Mitsubishi Electric Corp. v European Commission

15

2011/C 347/25

Case C-492/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Mercato San Severino (Italy) lodged on 26 September 2011 — Ciro Di Donna v Società imballaggi metallici Salerno Srl (SIMSA)

16

2011/C 347/26

Case C-493/11 P: Appeal brought on 23 September 2011 by United Technologies Corp. against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Case T-141/07: United Technologies Corp. v European Commission

17

2011/C 347/27

Case C-494/11 P: Appeal brought on 23 September 2011 by Otis Luxembourg Sàrl, formerly General Technic-Otis Sàrl, Otis SA, Otis BV, Otis Elevator Company, Otis GmbH & Co. OHG against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Case T-141/07: Otis Luxembourg Sàrl, formerly General Technic-Otis Sàrl, Otis SA, Otis BV, Otis Elevator Company, Otis GmbH & Co. OHG v European Commission

18

2011/C 347/28

Case C-498/11 P: Appeal brought on 27 September 2011 by Toshiba Corp. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 12 July 2011 in Case T-113/07: Toshiba Corp. v European Commission

18

2011/C 347/29

Case C-501/11 P: Appeal brought on 28 September 2011 by Schindler Holding Ltd, Schindler Management AG, Schindler SA, Schindler Sàrl, Schindler Liften BV and Schindler Deutschland Holding GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Case T-138/07 Schindler Holding Ltd and Others v European Commission, supported by the Council of the European Union

19

2011/C 347/30

Case C-502/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 30 September 2011 — Vivaio dei Molini Azienda Agricola Porro Savoldi ss v Autorità per la Vigilanza sui Contratti Pubblici di lavori, servizi e forniture

20

2011/C 347/31

Case C-503/11 P: Appeal brought on 30 September 2011 by ThyssenKrupp Elevator (CENE) GmbH, formerly ThyssenKrupp Aufzüge GmbH, and ThyssenKrupp Fahrtreppen GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Joined Cases T-144/07, T-147/07, T-148/07, T-149/07, T-150/07 and T-154/07 ThyssenKrupp Liften Ascenseurs and Others v European Commission

21

2011/C 347/32

Case C-504/11 P: Appeal brought on 30 September 2011 by ThyssenKrupp Ascenseurs Luxemburg Sàrl against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Joined Cases T-144/07, T-147/07, T-148/07, T-149/07, T-150/07 and T-154/07 ThyssenKrupp Liften Ascenseurs and Others v European Commission

22

2011/C 347/33

Case C-505/11 P: Appeal brought on 30 September 2011 by ThyssenKrupp Elevator AG against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Joined Cases T-144/07, T-147/07, T-148/07, T-149/07, T-150/07 and T-154/07 ThyssenKrupp Liften Ascenseurs and Others v European Commission

23

2011/C 347/34

Case C-506/11 P: Appeal brought on 30 September 2011 by ThyssenKrupp AG against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Joined Cases T-144/07, T-147/07, T-148/07, T-149/07, T-150/07 and T-154/07 ThyssenKrupp Liften Ascenseurs and Others v Commission

24

2011/C 347/35

Case C-512/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Työtuomioistuin (Finland) lodged on 3 October 2011 — Terveys- ja sosiaalialan neuvottelujärjestö TSN ry v Terveyspalvelualan Liitto ry, Mehiläinen Oy

25

2011/C 347/36

Case C-513/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Työtuomioistuin (Finland) lodged on 3 October 2011 — Ylemmät Toimihenkilöt YTN ry v Teknologiateollisuus ry, Nokia Siemens Networks Oy

25

General Court

2011/C 347/37

Case T-38/05: Judgment of the General Court of 12 October 2011 — Agroexpansión v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Spanish market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing and market sharing — Fines — Attributability of the unlawful conduct — Maximum limit of 10 % of turnover — Deterrent effect — Equal treatment — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation)

26

2011/C 347/38

Case T-41/05: Judgment of the General Court of 12 October 2011 — Alliance One International v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Spanish market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing and market-sharing — Fines — Attributability of the unlawful conduct — Maximum limit of 10 % of turnover — Deterrent effect — Attenuating circumstances)

26

2011/C 347/39

Case T-139/06: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2011 — France v Commission (Failure to comply with a judgment of the Court of Justice finding that there has been failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Periodic penalty payment — Adoption, by the Member State, of certain measures — Request for payment — Competence of the Commission — Jurisdiction of the General Court)

27

2011/C 347/40

Case T-312/07: Judgment of the General Court of 12 October 2011 — Dimos Peramatos v Commission (Financial contribution granted for an environmental project — LIFE — Decision to recover in part the amount paid out — Determination of the obligations of the recipient undertaken in the financed project — Legitimate expectations — Obligation to state reasons)

27

2011/C 347/41

Case T-449/08: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2011 — SLV Elektronik v OHIM — Jiménez Muñoz (LINE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark LINE — Earlier national word and figurative marks Line — Partial refusal to register — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

27

2011/C 347/42

Case T-561/08: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2011 — Gutknecht v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Health policy — Biocidal products — Establishment of a list of active substances on the market — Adoption of regulations by the Commission by virtue of Directive 98/8/EC — Causal link)

28

2011/C 347/43

Case T-393/09: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2011 — NEC Display Solutions Europe GmbH v OHIM — Nokia (NaViKey) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark NaViKey — Earlier Community word mark NAVI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Breach of the duty to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)

28

2011/C 347/44

Case T-439/09: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2011 — Purvis v Parliament (Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Additional pension scheme — Refusal to grant a voluntary additional pension in part in the form of a lump sum — Plea of illegality — Acquired rights — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality)

28

2011/C 347/45

Case T-53/10: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2011 — Reisenthel v OHIM — Dynamic Promotion (Hampers, crates and baskets) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity by the Invalidity Division — Notification of the Invalidity Division’s decision by fax — Appeal before the Board of Appeal — Written statement setting out the grounds of appeal — Period for submission — Admissibility of the appeal — Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Correction of a decision — Article 39 of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 — General principle of law authorising the withdrawal of an unlawful decision)

29

2011/C 347/46

Case T-87/10: Judgment of the General Court of 11 October 2011 — Chestnut Medical Technologies v OHIM (PIPELINE) (Community trade mark — Application for registration of the Community word mark PIPELINE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)

29

2011/C 347/47

Case T-213/10: Judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2011 — P v Parliament (Appeal — Civil Service — Temporary staff — Dismissal — Breakdown of trust — Statement of reasons — Distortion of the evidence)

29

2011/C 347/48

Case T-224/10: Judgment of the General Court of 12 October 2011 — Association belge des consommateurs test-achats v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Belgian energy market — Decision declaring a merger to be compatible with the common market — Commitments given during the initial phase of the investigation — Decision refusing the partial referral of the merger investigation to the national authorities — Action for annulment — Consumer association — Interest in bringing proceedings — Failure to initiate the in-depth review procedure — Procedural rights — Inadmissibility)

30

2011/C 347/49

Case T-304/10: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2011 — dm-drogerie markt v OHIM — Semtee (caldea) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the Community figurative mark caldea — Earlier international word mark BALEA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

30

2011/C 347/50

Case T-277/07: Order of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Secure Computing v OHIM — Investrónica (SECUREOS) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)

31

2011/C 347/51

Case T-341/08: Order of the General Court of 30 June 2011 — Hess Group v OHIM — Coloma Navarro (COLOMÉ) (Community trade mark — Application for a declaration of invalidity — Agreement and withdrawal of application — No need to adjudicate)

31

2011/C 347/52

Case T-96/09: Order of the General Court of 28 September 2011 — UCAPT v Council (Action for annulment — Common agricultural policy — Support schemes for farmers — Production aid for tobacco — Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 — Not of individual concern — Inadmissible)

31

2011/C 347/53

Case T-128/09: Order of the General Court of 3 October 2011 — Meridiana and Meridiana fly v Commission (State aid — Action for annulment — Applicants’ failure to act — No need to adjudicate)

32

2011/C 347/54

Case T-297/10: Order of the General Court of 11 October 2011 — DBV v Commission (Action for annulment — Dumping — Imports of certain aluminium wheels originating in China — Rights of defence — Calculation of normal value — Proportionality — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

32

2011/C 347/55

Case T-149/11: Order of the General Court of 12 October 2011 — GS v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Regulation (EU) No 1210/2010 — Right of the Member States to refuse the reimbursement of euro coins unfit for circulation — No direct concern — Inadmissible)

32

2011/C 347/56

Case T-206/11: Order of the General Court of 28 September 2011 — Complex v OHIM — Kajometal (KX) (Community trade mark — Refusal of registration — Withdrawal of application for registration — No need to adjudicate)

33

2011/C 347/57

Case T-346/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 30 September 2011 — Gollnisch v Parliament (Interim measures — Waiving of the immunity of a member of the European Parliament — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency)

33

2011/C 347/58

Case T-347/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 30 September 2011 — Gollnisch v Parliament (Interim measures — Rejection of the request for the defence of immunity for a member of the European Parliament — Application for suspension of operation — Inadmissibility)

33

2011/C 347/59

Case T-379/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 15 September 2011 — Hüttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann and Others v Commission (Interim relief — Environment — Allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances free of charge in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC — Setting of the product benchmarks the subject of the Commission’s decision — Application for interim measures — Admissibility — Urgency)

33

2011/C 347/60

Case T-381/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 15 September 2011 — Eurofer v Commission (Interim relief — Environment — Allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances free of charge in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC — Setting of the product benchmarks the subject of the Commission’s decision — Application for interim measures — Admissibility — Urgency)

34

2011/C 347/61

Case T-384/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 28 September 2011 — Safa Nicu Sepahan v Council (Application for interim measures — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Application for interim measures — Lack of urgency)

34

2011/C 347/62

Case T-395/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 30 September 2011 — Elti v Delegation of the European Union to Montenegro (Application for interim measures — Public procurement — Tendering procedure — Rejection of a tender — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Disregard of the formal requirements — Inadmissibility)

34

2011/C 347/63

Case T-421/11 R: Order of the judge of the General Court hearing applications for interim measures of 3 October 2011 — Qualitest FZE v Council (Application for interim measures — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Lack of urgency)

35

2011/C 347/64

Case T-422/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 5 October 2011 — Computer Resources International (Luxembourg) v Commission (Interim measures — Public procurement — Tendering procedure — Rejection of a tender — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Loss of opportunity — Lack of serious and irreparable damage — Lack of urgency)

35

2011/C 347/65

Case T-309/10: Action brought on 15 September 2011 — Klein v Commission

35

2011/C 347/66

Case T-489/11: Action brought on 20 September 2011 — Rousse Industry v Commission

36

2011/C 347/67

Case T-495/11: Action brought on 19 September 2011 — Streng v OHIM — Gismondi (PARAMETRICA)

37

2011/C 347/68

Case T-498/11: Action brought on 16 September 2011 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission

37

2011/C 347/69

Case T-503/11: Action brought on 27 September 2011 — Al-Aqsa v Council

38

2011/C 347/70

Case T-508/11: Action brought on 27 September 2011 — LTTE v Council

39

2011/C 347/71

Case T-512/11: Action brought on 24 September 2011 — Ryanair v Commission

40

2011/C 347/72

Case T-516/11: Action brought on 22 September 2011 — MasterCard and Others v Commission

40

2011/C 347/73

Case T-519/11 P: Appeal brought on 29 September 2011 by Sandro Gozi against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 20 July 2011 in Case F-116/10 Gozi v Commission

41

2011/C 347/74

Case T-526/11: Action brought on 3 October 2011 — Igcar Chemicals v ECHA

41

2011/C 347/75

Case T-538/11: Action brought on 10 October 2011 — Belgium v Commission

42

2011/C 347/76

Case T-540/11: Action brought on 4 October 2011 — Melkveebedrijf Overenk and Others v Commission

42

2011/C 347/77

Case T-234/00: Order of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Fondazione Opera S. Maria della Carità v Commission

44

2011/C 347/78

Case T-235/00: Order of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Codess Sociale and Others v Commission

44

2011/C 347/79

Case T-255/00: Order of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Ciga and Others v Commission

44

2011/C 347/80

Case T-266/00: Order of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Confartigianato Venezia and Others v Commission

44

2011/C 347/81

Case T-502/09: Order of the General Court of 11 October 2011 — Inovis v OHIM — Sonaecom (INOVIS)

44

2011/C 347/82

Case T-23/11: Order of the General Court of 11 October 2011 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — BA&SH (ba&sh)

44

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2011/C 347/83

Case F-87/11: Action brought on 13 September 2011 — ZZ v FRONTEX

45

2011/C 347/84

Case F-88/11: Action brought on 16 September 2011 — ZZ v Commission

45

2011/C 347/85

Case F-89/11: Action brought on 18 September 2011 — ZZ v Committee of the Regions

45

2011/C 347/86

Case F-92/11: Action brought on 23 September 2011 — ZZ v EESC

46

2011/C 347/87

Case F-93/11: Action brought on 23 September 2011 — ZZ v Commission

46

2011/C 347/88

Case F-95/11: Action brought on 28 September 2011 — ZZ v EIB

46

2011/C 347/89

Case F-97/11: Action brought on 3 October 2011 — ZZ v Parliament

47

2011/C 347/90

Case F-98/11: Action brought on 3 October 2011 — ZZ and Others v European Commission

47

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN