# Official Journal C 148/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.148.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 148 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 535 June 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.148.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 148

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 535 June 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2010/C 148/01 | Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 134, 22.5.2010 | 1 |
| 2010/C 148/02 | Designation of the Judge replacing the President as the Judge hearing applications for interim measures | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2010/C 148/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 134, 22.5.2010

Official Journal of the European Union

1

2010/C 148/02

Designation of the Judge replacing the President as the Judge hearing applications for interim measures

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2010/C 148/03 | Case C-433/05: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Handens Tingsrätt (Sweden)) — Criminal proceedings against Lars Sandström (Directives 94/25/EC and 2003/44/EC — Approximation of laws — Recreational craft — Prohibition of using personal watercraft on waters other than general navigable waterways — Articles 28 EC and 30 EC — Measures having equivalent effect — Access to the market — Impediment — Protection of the environment — Proportionality — Directive 98/34/EC — Article 8 — Amendment to national legislation — Obligation to notify — Conditions) | 2 |
| 2010/C 148/04 | Case C-73/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle — Belgium) — Nicolas Bressol, Anthony Wolf, Cédric Helie, Valérie Jabot, Claude Keusterickx, Denis Wilmet, Charlène Meurou, David Bacquart, Ayhar Gabriel Arslan, Yves Busegnies, Serge Clement, Sabine Gelaes, Etienne Dubuisson, Caroline Kinet, Dominique Peeters, Robert Lontie, Yannick Homerin, Isabelle Pochet, Walid Salem, Karin Van Loon, Olivier Leduc, Annick Van Wallendael, Dorothée Van Eecke, Olivier Ducruet, Céline Hinck, Nicole Arpigny, Eric De Gunsch, Thibaut De Mesmaeker, Mikel Ezquer, Constantino Balestra, Philippe Delince, Madeleine Merche, Jean-Pierre Saliez, Véronique de Mahieu, Muriel Alard, Danielle Collard, Pierre Castelein, Dominique De Crits, André Antoine, Christine Antierens, Brigitte Debert, Véronique Leloux, Patrick Parmentier, M. Simon, Céline Chaverot, Marine Guiet, Floriane Poirson, Laura Soumagne, Elodie Hamon, Benjamin Lombardet, Julie Mingant, Anne Simon, Anaïs Serrate, Sandrine Jadaud, Patricia Barbier, Laurence Coulon, Renée Hollestelle, Jacqueline Ghion, Pascale Schmitz, Sophie Thirion, Céline Vandeuren, Isabelle Compagnion v Gouvernement de la Communauté française (Citizenship of the Union — Articles 18 and 21 TFEU — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 24(1) — Freedom to reside — Principle of non-discrimination — Access to higher education — Nationals of a Member State moving to another Member State in order to pursue studies there — Restriction on enrolment by non-resident students for university courses in the public health field — Justification — Proportionality — Risk to the quality of education in medical and paramedical matters — Risk of shortage of graduates in the public health sectors) | 3 |
| 2010/C 148/05 | Case C-91/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — Wall AG v Stadt Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurter Entsorgungs- und Service GmbH (FES) (Service concessions — Award procedure — Obligation of transparency — Subsequent replacement of a subcontractor) | 4 |
| 2010/C 148/06 | Case C-96/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 April 2010 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Pest Megyei Bíróság (Hungary)) — CIBA Speciality Chemicals Central and Eastern Europe Szolgáltató, Tanácsadó és Keresdedelmi Kft. v Adó- és Pénzügyi Ellenőrzési Hivatal Hatósági Főosztály (Freedom of establishment — Direct taxation — Vocational training levy — Basis for calculating the levy to be paid by undertakings established in the national territory — Account taken of the wage costs of workers employed in a branch established in another Member State — Double taxation — Whether it is possible to reduce gross liability to the levy) | 5 |
| 2010/C 148/07 | Case C-215/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — E. Friz GmbH v Carsten von der Heyden (Consumer protection — Contracts negotiated away from business premises — Scope of Directive 85/577/EEC — Entry into a closed-end real property fund established in the form of a partnership — Cancellation) | 5 |
| 2010/C 148/08 | Case C-485/08 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 April 2010 — Claudia Gualtieri v European Commission (Appeal — Seconded national expert — Daily subsistence allowance — Principle of equal treatment) | 6 |
| 2010/C 148/09 | Case C-511/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany)) — Verbraucherzentrale Nordrhein-Westfalen eV v Handelsgesellschaft Heinrich Heine GmbH (Directive 97/7/EC — Consumer protection — Distance contracts — Right of withdrawal — Consumer charged with the cost of delivering the goods) | 6 |
| 2010/C 148/10 | Case C-518/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France)) — Fundación Gala-Salvador Dalí, Visual Entidad de Gestión de Artistas Plásticos v Société Auteurs dans les arts graphiques et plastiques, Juan-Leonardo Bonet Domenech, Eulalia-María Bas Dalí, María del Carmen Domenech Biosca, Antonio Domenech Biosca, Ana-María Busquets Bonet, Mónica Busquets Bonet (Approximation of laws — Intellectual property — Copyright and related rights — Resale right for the benefit of the author of an original work of art — Directive 2001/84/EC — Persons entitled to receive royalties after the death of the author of the work of art — Concept of ‘those entitled’ — National legislation retaining, for a period of 70 years after the death of the author, the resale right solely for the benefit of the author’s heirs, to the exclusion of all legatees and successors in title — Whether that legislation is compatible with Directive 2001/84) | 7 |
| 2010/C 148/11 | Joined Cases C-538/08 and C-33/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden, Gerechtshof Amsterdam — Netherlands) — X Holding B.V. v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (Case C-538/08), Oracle Nederland BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst Utrecht-Gooi (Case C-33/09) (Sixth VAT Directive — Right to deduct input tax — National legislation excluding certain categories of goods and services from the right to deduct — Option for Member States to retain rules excluding the right to deduct which were in existence when the Sixth VAT Directive entered into force — Amendment after that directive had entered into force) | 7 |
| 2010/C 148/12 | Case C-542/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Friedrich G. Barth v Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Forschung (Freedom of movement for persons — Workers — Equal treatment — Special length-of-service increment for university professors provided for by national legislation held to be incompatible with Community law by a judgment of the Court — Limitation period — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness) | 8 |
| 2010/C 148/13 | Case C-38/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 April 2010 — Ralf Schräder v Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) (Appeal — The Court’s power of review — Regulations (EC) Nos 2100/94 and 1239/95 — Agriculture — Community plant variety rights — Distinctness of the candidate variety — Variety a matter of common knowledge — Proof — Plant variety SUMCOL 01) | 9 |
| 2010/C 148/14 | Case C-64/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 April 2010 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2000/53/EC — Articles 5(3) and (4), 6(3) and 7(1) — Defective transposition) | 9 |
| 2010/C 148/15 | Case C-294/09: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 April 2010 — European Commission v Ireland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2006/43/EC — Statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts — Failure to transpose completely within the prescribed period — Failure to communicate the measures to transpose the directive) | 10 |
| 2010/C 148/16 | Case C-80/09 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 February 2010 — Volker Mergel, Klaus Kampfenkel, Burkart Bill, Andreas Herden v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 7(1)(c) — Refusal to register — Word mark Patentconsult — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded) | 10 |
| 2010/C 148/17 | Case C-282/09 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 March 2010 — Caisse fédérale du Crédit mutuel Centre Est Europe (CFCMCEE) v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) — Refusal to register — Overall assessment with regard to the goods and services referred to in the application for registration — Goods and services constitute homogeneous groups — Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible) | 11 |
| 2010/C 148/18 | Case C-550/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 29 December 2009 — Generalbundesanwalt beim Bundesgerichtshof v E and F | 11 |
| 2010/C 148/19 | Case C-81/10 P: Appeal brought on 12 February 2010 by France Télécom SA against the judgment delivered on 30 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-427/04 and T-17/05 French Republic and France Télécom v Commission | 12 |
| 2010/C 148/20 | Case C-120/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’Etat (Belgium) lodged on 5 March 2010 — European Air Transport SA v Collège d'Environnement de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, Région de Bruxelles-Capitale | 13 |
| 2010/C 148/21 | Case C-123/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 8 March 2010 — Waltraud Brachner v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt | 14 |
| 2010/C 148/22 | Case C-131/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 12 March 2010 — Corman SA v Bureau d'intervention et de restitution belge (BIRB) | 14 |
| 2010/C 148/23 | Case C-133/10: Action brought on 15 March 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium | 15 |
| 2010/C 148/24 | Case C-137/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 15 March 2010 — The European Communities v The Région de Bruxelles-Capitale | 15 |
| 2010/C 148/25 | Case C-138/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad (Bulgaria) lodged on 15 March 2010 — DP Grup EOOD v Direcktor na Agentsia ‘Mituitsi’ | 16 |
| 2010/C 148/26 | Case C-144/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 18 March 2010 — Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG), Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts v JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., Frankfurt Branch | 17 |
| 2010/C 148/27 | Case C-145/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 22 March 2010 — Eva-Maria Painer v Standard VerlagsGmbH, Axel Springer AG, Süddeutsche Zeitung GmbH, SPIEGEL-Verlag Rudolf AUGSTEIN GmbH & Co KG, Verlag M. DuMont Schauberg Expedition der Kölnischen Zeitung GmbH & Co KG | 17 |
| 2010/C 148/28 | Case C-146/10: Action brought on 26 March 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Austria | 18 |
| 2010/C 148/29 | Case C-147/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Chancery Division, made on 29 March 2010 — British Sugar plc v Rural Payments Agency, an Executive Agency of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs | 19 |
| 2010/C 148/30 | Case C-149/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Diikitiko Efetio Thessalonikis (Greece) lodged on 29 March 2010 — Zoe Chatzi v Ipourgos Ikonomikon | 20 |
| 2010/C 148/31 | Case C-152/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret (Denmark) lodged on 31 March 2010 — Unomedical A/S v Skatteministeriet | 20 |
| 2010/C 148/32 | Case C-156/10 P: Appeal brought on 6 April 2010 by Mr Karen Goncharov against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 21 January 2010 in Case T-34/07 Karen Goncharov v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs); other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: DSB | 21 |
| 2010/C 148/33 | Case C-161/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) lodged on 6 April 2010 — Olivier Martinez, Robert Martinez v MGN Ltd | 21 |
| 2010/C 148/34 | Case C-307/08: Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 19 March 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium | 22 |
| 2010/C 148/35 | Case C-450/08: Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 12 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Tübingen — Germany) — FGK Gesellschaft für Antriebsmechanik mbH v Notar Gerhard Schwenkel, in the presence of: Präsidentin des Landgericht Tübingen | 22 |
| 2010/C 148/36 | Case C-26/09: Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 5 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal — United Kingdom) — The Motor Insurers’ Bureau v Helphire (UK) Limited, Angel Assistance Limited | 22 |
| 2010/C 148/37 | Case C-172/09: Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 10 March 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland | 23 |
| 2010/C 148/38 | Case C-223/09: Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland | 23 |
| 2010/C 148/39 | Case C-370/09: Order of the President of the Court of 26 February 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic | 23 |
| 2010/C 148/40 | Joined Cases C-411/09 to C-420/09: Order of the President of the Court of 19 March 2010 (references for preliminary rulings from the tribunal de grande instance de Nanterre — France) — Tereos, Vermandoise Industries SA, Sucreries de Toury et Usines annexes SA, Roquette Frères SA, Sucreries & Distilleries de Souppes — Ouvré Fils SA, Cruistal Union, Lesaffre Frères SA, Sucreries Bourdon, SAFBA, Sucreries du Marquenterre SA v Directeur général des douanes et droits indirects, Receveur principal des douanes et droits indirects de Gennevilliers | 23 |
| | General Court |
| 2010/C 148/41 | Case T-446/05: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — Amann & Söhne and Cousin Filterie v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in industrial thread — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Concept of a single infringement — Definition of the market — Fines — Upper limit for the fine — Gravity and duration of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Rights of the defence — Guidelines on the method of setting fines) | 24 |
| 2010/C 148/42 | Case T-448/05: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — Oxley Threads v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in thread for automotive customers — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Guidelines on the method of setting fines) | 24 |
| 2010/C 148/43 | Case T-452/05: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — BST v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in industrial thread — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation — Non-contractual liability — Disclosure of confidential information — Damage — Causal link) | 25 |
| 2010/C 148/44 | Joined Cases T-456/05 and T-457/05: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — Gütermann and Zwicky v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in industrial thread — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Actual impact on the market — Duration of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Proportionality — Guidelines on the method of setting fines) | 25 |
| 2010/C 148/45 | Case T-103/06: Judgment of the General Court of 13 April 2010 — Esotrade v OHIM — Segura Sánchez (YoKaNa) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark YoKaNa — Earlier Community and national figurative marks YOKONO — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 26 |
| 2010/C 148/46 | Case T-488/07: Judgment of the General Court of 15 April 2010 — Cabel Hall Citrus v OHIM — Casur (EGLÉFRUIT) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark EGLÉFRUIT — Earlier Community word mark UGLI and earlier national figurative mark ‘UGLI Fruit — but the affliction is only skin deep’ — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 26 |
| 2010/C 148/47 | Case T-187/08: Judgment of the General Court of 20 April 2010 — Rodd & Gunn Australia v OHIM (Representation of a dog) (Community trade mark — Figurative Community trade mark representing a dog — Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration — Request for renewal of the mark — Application for restitutio in integrum — Article 78 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 81 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 27 |
| 2010/C 148/48 | Case T-249/08: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2010 — Coin v OHIM — Dynamiki Zoi (Fitcoin) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark ‘Fitcoin’ — Earlier national, international and Community figurative marks ‘coin’ — Relative ground for refusal — Relevant public — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 27 |
| 2010/C 148/49 | Cases T-274/08 and T-275/08: Judgment of the General Court of 22 April 2010 — Italy v Commission (EAGF — Clearance of the accounts of the paying agencies of Member States concerning expenditure financed by the EAGF — Sums recoverable from the Italian Republic where there is non-recovery within the time-limits specified — Meaning of financial consequences — Receipt of interest — Article 32(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005) | 28 |
| 2010/C 148/50 | Case T-361/08: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2010 — Peek & Cloppenburg and van Graaf v OHIM — Queen Sirikit Institute of Sericulture (Thai Silk) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the figurative Community trade mark Thai Silk — Earlier national figurative trade mark representing a winged creature — Admissibility of the action — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 28 |
| 2010/C 148/51 | Case T-514/08: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2010 — Laboratorios Byly v OHIM — Ginis (BILLY’S Products) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark BILLY’S Products — Earlier Community and national word marks BYLY and byly — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 29 |
| 2010/C 148/52 | Case T-7/09: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2010 — Schunk v OHIM (Presentation of part of a chuck) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community trade mark in the form of a presentation of part of a chuck with three grooves — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Lack of distinctive character acquired by use — Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 29 |
| 2010/C 148/53 | Case T-225/09: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — Claro v OHIM — Telefónica (Claro) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community three-dimensional mark Claro — Earlier Community word mark CLARO — Inadmissibility of the appeal brought before the Board of Appeal — Articles 59 and 62 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Articles 60 and 64 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Rule 49(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95) | 30 |
| 2010/C 148/54 | Joined Cases T-529/08 to T-531/08: Order of the General Court of 13 April 2010 — Diputación Foral de Álava and Others v Commission (Application for annulment — State aid — Tax advantages — Recovery of State aid declared unlawful — Application of compound interest scheme — Confirmatory act — Inadmissibility) | 30 |
| 2010/C 148/55 | Case T-16/09 P: Order of the General Court of 23 March 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Staff case — Officials — Reasonable time for the submission of a claim for compensation — Lateness — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded) | 31 |
| 2010/C 148/56 | Case T-527/09: Action brought on 6 April 2010 — Ayadi v Commission | 31 |
| 2010/C 148/57 | Case T-117/10: Action brought on 5 March 2010 — Italy v Commission | 32 |
| 2010/C 148/58 | Case T-122/10: Action brought on 10 March 2010 — USFSPEI and Others v Council | 33 |
| 2010/C 148/59 | Case T-125/10: Action brought on 18 March 2010 — Amecke Fruchtsaft v OHIM — Uhse (69 Sex up) | 34 |
| 2010/C 148/60 | Case T-131/10: Action brought on 22 March 2010 — Saupiquet v Commission | 34 |
| 2010/C 148/61 | Case T-132/10: Action brought on 22 March 2010 — Communauté de communes de Lacq v Commission | 35 |
| 2010/C 148/62 | Case T-134/10: Action brought on 19 March 2010 — FESI v Conseil | 36 |
| 2010/C 148/63 | Case T-136/10: Action brought on 16 March 2010 — M v EMEA | 37 |
| 2010/C 148/64 | Case T-137/10: Action brought on 17 March 2010 — Coordination bruxelloise d'Institutions sociales et de santé (CBI) v European Commission | 38 |
| 2010/C 148/65 | Case T-139/10: Action brought on 26 March 2010 — Milux v OHIM (REFLUXCONTROL) | 39 |
| 2010/C 148/66 | Case T-140/10: Action brought on 26 March 2010 — Hans Günter Söns v OHIM — Settimio (GREAT CHINA WALL) | 39 |
| 2010/C 148/67 | Case T-145/10: Action brought on 24 March 2010 — Solae v OHIM — Délitaste (alpha taste) | 40 |
| 2010/C 148/68 | Case T-147/10: Action brought on 30 March 2010 — Meda Pharma v OHIM — Nycomed (ALLERNIL) | 40 |
| 2010/C 148/69 | Case T-148/10: Action brought on 25 March 2010 — Hynix Semiconductor v Commission | 41 |
| 2010/C 148/70 | Case T-149/10: Action brought on 25 March 2010 — Hynix Semiconductor v Commission | 42 |
| 2010/C 148/71 | Case T-150/10: Action brought on 26 March 2010 — Telefónica O2 Germany v OHIM — Loopia (LOOPIA) | 43 |
| 2010/C 148/72 | Case T-151/10: Action brought on 1 April 2010 — Bank Nederlandse Gemeenten NV v Commission | 43 |
| 2010/C 148/73 | Case T-152/10: Action brought on 30 March 2010 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM | 44 |
| 2010/C 148/74 | Case T-153/10: Action brought on 6 April 2010 — Schneider España de Informática v Commission | 45 |
| 2010/C 148/75 | Case T-156/10: Action brought on 6 April 2010 — Confederación de Cooperativas Agrarias de España and CEPES v Commission | 46 |
| 2010/C 148/76 | Case T-157/10: Action brought on 8 April 2010 — Barilla v OHIM — Brauerei Schlösser (ALIXIR) | 47 |
| 2010/C 148/77 | Case T-161/10: Action brought on 8 April 2010 — Longevity Health Products v OHIM — Tecnifar (E-PLEX) | 47 |
| 2010/C 148/78 | Case T-165/10: Action brought on 12 April 2010 — Grupo Osborne v OHIM — Confecciones Sanfertús (TORO) | 48 |
| 2010/C 148/79 | Case T-169/10: Action brought on 14 April 2010 — Grupo Osborne v OHIM — Industria Licorera Quezalteca (TORO XL) | 49 |
| 2010/C 148/80 | Case T-171/10: Action brought on 15 April 2010 — Slovak Telekom v Commission | 49 |
| 2010/C 148/81 | Case T-279/07: Order of the General Court of 23 March 2010 — France v Commission | 50 |
| 2010/C 148/82 | Case T-289/07: Order of the General Court of 23 March 2010 — Caisse Nationale des Caisses d'Epargne et de Prévoyance v Commission | 50 |
| 2010/C 148/83 | Case T-345/07: Order of the General Court of 23 March 2010 — Banque Postale v Commission | 51 |
| 2010/C 148/84 | Case T-431/08: Order of the General Court of 12 April 2010 — Bulur Giyim Sanayi ve Ticaret Sirketi v OHIM — Denim (VIGOSS) | 51 |
| 2010/C 148/85 | Case T-527/08: Order of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — Commission v TMT Pragma | 51 |
| 2010/C 148/86 | Case T-533/08: Order of the General Court of 19 March 2010 — Telekomunikacja Polska v Commission | 51 |
| 2010/C 148/87 | Case T-45/09: Order of the General Court of 22 March 2010 — Al Barakaat International Foundation v Commission | 51 |
| 2010/C 148/88 | Case T-256/09: Order of the General Court of 12 April 2010 — Aecops v Commission | 51 |
| 2010/C 148/89 | Case T-257/09: Order of the General Court of 12 April 2010 — Aecops v Commission | 51 |
| 2010/C 148/90 | Case T-26/10: Order of the General Court of 15 April 2010 — Alibaba Group v OHIM — allpay.net (ALIPAY) | 51 |
| | European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
| 2010/C 148/91 | Case F-2/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 April 2010 — Matos Martins v Commission (Staff case — Members of the contract staff — Call for expression of interest — Selection procedure — Pre-selection tests — Access to documents) | 52 |
| 2010/C 148/92 | Case F-104/08: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 April 2010 — Angelidis v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Vacant post — Execution of a judgment annulling the appointing decision — Legitimate expectations — Principle of officials’ entitlement to a career — Equal treatment — Principle of sound administration — Duty to have regard to the welfare of officials — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers) | 52 |
| 2010/C 148/93 | Case F-4/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 April 2010 — Britto Patricio Dias v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Posting — Reassignment — Interests of the service — Correspondence between grade and post — Rights of the defence — Reasons stated) | 53 |
| 2010/C 148/94 | Case F-102/08: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 March 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Despatch of the applicant’s personal effects — Action for damages — Action manifestly inadmissible — Action manifestly unfounded in law — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure) | 53 |
| 2010/C 148/95 | Case F-96/09: Action brought on 26 March 2010 — Cuallado Martorell v Commission | 54 |
| 2010/C 148/96 | Case F-22/10: Action brought on 1 April 2010 — Bombín Bombín v Commission | 54 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2010/C 148/03

Case C-433/05: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Handens Tingsrätt (Sweden)) — Criminal proceedings against Lars Sandström (Directives 94/25/EC and 2003/44/EC — Approximation of laws — Recreational craft — Prohibition of using personal watercraft on waters other than general navigable waterways — Articles 28 EC and 30 EC — Measures having equivalent effect — Access to the market — Impediment — Protection of the environment — Proportionality — Directive 98/34/EC — Article 8 — Amendment to national legislation — Obligation to notify — Conditions)

2

2010/C 148/04

Case C-73/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle — Belgium) — Nicolas Bressol, Anthony Wolf, Cédric Helie, Valérie Jabot, Claude Keusterickx, Denis Wilmet, Charlène Meurou, David Bacquart, Ayhar Gabriel Arslan, Yves Busegnies, Serge Clement, Sabine Gelaes, Etienne Dubuisson, Caroline Kinet, Dominique Peeters, Robert Lontie, Yannick Homerin, Isabelle Pochet, Walid Salem, Karin Van Loon, Olivier Leduc, Annick Van Wallendael, Dorothée Van Eecke, Olivier Ducruet, Céline Hinck, Nicole Arpigny, Eric De Gunsch, Thibaut De Mesmaeker, Mikel Ezquer, Constantino Balestra, Philippe Delince, Madeleine Merche, Jean-Pierre Saliez, Véronique de Mahieu, Muriel Alard, Danielle Collard, Pierre Castelein, Dominique De Crits, André Antoine, Christine Antierens, Brigitte Debert, Véronique Leloux, Patrick Parmentier, M. Simon, Céline Chaverot, Marine Guiet, Floriane Poirson, Laura Soumagne, Elodie Hamon, Benjamin Lombardet, Julie Mingant, Anne Simon, Anaïs Serrate, Sandrine Jadaud, Patricia Barbier, Laurence Coulon, Renée Hollestelle, Jacqueline Ghion, Pascale Schmitz, Sophie Thirion, Céline Vandeuren, Isabelle Compagnion v Gouvernement de la Communauté française (Citizenship of the Union — Articles 18 and 21 TFEU — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 24(1) — Freedom to reside — Principle of non-discrimination — Access to higher education — Nationals of a Member State moving to another Member State in order to pursue studies there — Restriction on enrolment by non-resident students for university courses in the public health field — Justification — Proportionality — Risk to the quality of education in medical and paramedical matters — Risk of shortage of graduates in the public health sectors)

3

2010/C 148/05

Case C-91/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — Wall AG v Stadt Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurter Entsorgungs- und Service GmbH (FES) (Service concessions — Award procedure — Obligation of transparency — Subsequent replacement of a subcontractor)

4

2010/C 148/06

Case C-96/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 April 2010 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Pest Megyei Bíróság (Hungary)) — CIBA Speciality Chemicals Central and Eastern Europe Szolgáltató, Tanácsadó és Keresdedelmi Kft. v Adó- és Pénzügyi Ellenőrzési Hivatal Hatósági Főosztály (Freedom of establishment — Direct taxation — Vocational training levy — Basis for calculating the levy to be paid by undertakings established in the national territory — Account taken of the wage costs of workers employed in a branch established in another Member State — Double taxation — Whether it is possible to reduce gross liability to the levy)

5

2010/C 148/07

Case C-215/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — E. Friz GmbH v Carsten von der Heyden (Consumer protection — Contracts negotiated away from business premises — Scope of Directive 85/577/EEC — Entry into a closed-end real property fund established in the form of a partnership — Cancellation)

5

2010/C 148/08

Case C-485/08 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 April 2010 — Claudia Gualtieri v European Commission (Appeal — Seconded national expert — Daily subsistence allowance — Principle of equal treatment)

6

2010/C 148/09

Case C-511/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany)) — Verbraucherzentrale Nordrhein-Westfalen eV v Handelsgesellschaft Heinrich Heine GmbH (Directive 97/7/EC — Consumer protection — Distance contracts — Right of withdrawal — Consumer charged with the cost of delivering the goods)

6

2010/C 148/10

Case C-518/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France)) — Fundación Gala-Salvador Dalí, Visual Entidad de Gestión de Artistas Plásticos v Société Auteurs dans les arts graphiques et plastiques, Juan-Leonardo Bonet Domenech, Eulalia-María Bas Dalí, María del Carmen Domenech Biosca, Antonio Domenech Biosca, Ana-María Busquets Bonet, Mónica Busquets Bonet (Approximation of laws — Intellectual property — Copyright and related rights — Resale right for the benefit of the author of an original work of art — Directive 2001/84/EC — Persons entitled to receive royalties after the death of the author of the work of art — Concept of ‘those entitled’ — National legislation retaining, for a period of 70 years after the death of the author, the resale right solely for the benefit of the author’s heirs, to the exclusion of all legatees and successors in title — Whether that legislation is compatible with Directive 2001/84)

7

2010/C 148/11

Joined Cases C-538/08 and C-33/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden, Gerechtshof Amsterdam — Netherlands) — X Holding B.V. v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (Case C-538/08), Oracle Nederland BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst Utrecht-Gooi (Case C-33/09) (Sixth VAT Directive — Right to deduct input tax — National legislation excluding certain categories of goods and services from the right to deduct — Option for Member States to retain rules excluding the right to deduct which were in existence when the Sixth VAT Directive entered into force — Amendment after that directive had entered into force)

7

2010/C 148/12

Case C-542/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Friedrich G. Barth v Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Forschung (Freedom of movement for persons — Workers — Equal treatment — Special length-of-service increment for university professors provided for by national legislation held to be incompatible with Community law by a judgment of the Court — Limitation period — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness)

8

2010/C 148/13

Case C-38/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 April 2010 — Ralf Schräder v Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) (Appeal — The Court’s power of review — Regulations (EC) Nos 2100/94 and 1239/95 — Agriculture — Community plant variety rights — Distinctness of the candidate variety — Variety a matter of common knowledge — Proof — Plant variety SUMCOL 01)

9

2010/C 148/14

Case C-64/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 April 2010 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2000/53/EC — Articles 5(3) and (4), 6(3) and 7(1) — Defective transposition)

9

2010/C 148/15

Case C-294/09: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 April 2010 — European Commission v Ireland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2006/43/EC — Statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts — Failure to transpose completely within the prescribed period — Failure to communicate the measures to transpose the directive)

10

2010/C 148/16

Case C-80/09 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 February 2010 — Volker Mergel, Klaus Kampfenkel, Burkart Bill, Andreas Herden v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 7(1)(c) — Refusal to register — Word mark Patentconsult — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

10

2010/C 148/17

Case C-282/09 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 March 2010 — Caisse fédérale du Crédit mutuel Centre Est Europe (CFCMCEE) v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) — Refusal to register — Overall assessment with regard to the goods and services referred to in the application for registration — Goods and services constitute homogeneous groups — Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible)

11

2010/C 148/18

Case C-550/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 29 December 2009 — Generalbundesanwalt beim Bundesgerichtshof v E and F

11

2010/C 148/19

Case C-81/10 P: Appeal brought on 12 February 2010 by France Télécom SA against the judgment delivered on 30 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-427/04 and T-17/05 French Republic and France Télécom v Commission

French Republic and France Télécom v Commission

12

2010/C 148/20

Case C-120/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’Etat (Belgium) lodged on 5 March 2010 — European Air Transport SA v Collège d'Environnement de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, Région de Bruxelles-Capitale

13

2010/C 148/21

Case C-123/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 8 March 2010 — Waltraud Brachner v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt

14

2010/C 148/22

Case C-131/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 12 March 2010 — Corman SA v Bureau d'intervention et de restitution belge (BIRB)

14

2010/C 148/23

Case C-133/10: Action brought on 15 March 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

15

2010/C 148/24

Case C-137/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 15 March 2010 — The European Communities v The Région de Bruxelles-Capitale

15

2010/C 148/25

Case C-138/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad (Bulgaria) lodged on 15 March 2010 — DP Grup EOOD v Direcktor na Agentsia ‘Mituitsi’

16

2010/C 148/26

Case C-144/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 18 March 2010 — Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG), Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts v JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., Frankfurt Branch

17

2010/C 148/27

Case C-145/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 22 March 2010 — Eva-Maria Painer v Standard VerlagsGmbH, Axel Springer AG, Süddeutsche Zeitung GmbH, SPIEGEL-Verlag Rudolf AUGSTEIN GmbH & Co KG, Verlag M. DuMont Schauberg Expedition der Kölnischen Zeitung GmbH & Co KG

17

2010/C 148/28

Case C-146/10: Action brought on 26 March 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Austria

18

2010/C 148/29

Case C-147/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Chancery Division, made on 29 March 2010 — British Sugar plc v Rural Payments Agency, an Executive Agency of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

19

2010/C 148/30

Case C-149/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Diikitiko Efetio Thessalonikis (Greece) lodged on 29 March 2010 — Zoe Chatzi v Ipourgos Ikonomikon

20

2010/C 148/31

Case C-152/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret (Denmark) lodged on 31 March 2010 — Unomedical A/S v Skatteministeriet

20

2010/C 148/32

Case C-156/10 P: Appeal brought on 6 April 2010 by Mr Karen Goncharov against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 21 January 2010 in Case T-34/07 Karen Goncharov v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs); other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: DSB

21

2010/C 148/33

Case C-161/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) lodged on 6 April 2010 — Olivier Martinez, Robert Martinez v MGN Ltd

21

2010/C 148/34

Case C-307/08: Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 19 March 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

22

2010/C 148/35

Case C-450/08: Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 12 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Tübingen — Germany) — FGK Gesellschaft für Antriebsmechanik mbH v Notar Gerhard Schwenkel, in the presence of: Präsidentin des Landgericht Tübingen

22

2010/C 148/36

Case C-26/09: Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 5 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal — United Kingdom) — The Motor Insurers’ Bureau v Helphire (UK) Limited, Angel Assistance Limited

22

2010/C 148/37

Case C-172/09: Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 10 March 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

23

2010/C 148/38

Case C-223/09: Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

23

2010/C 148/39

Case C-370/09: Order of the President of the Court of 26 February 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

23

2010/C 148/40

Joined Cases C-411/09 to C-420/09: Order of the President of the Court of 19 March 2010 (references for preliminary rulings from the tribunal de grande instance de Nanterre — France) — Tereos, Vermandoise Industries SA, Sucreries de Toury et Usines annexes SA, Roquette Frères SA, Sucreries & Distilleries de Souppes — Ouvré Fils SA, Cruistal Union, Lesaffre Frères SA, Sucreries Bourdon, SAFBA, Sucreries du Marquenterre SA v Directeur général des douanes et droits indirects, Receveur principal des douanes et droits indirects de Gennevilliers

23

General Court

2010/C 148/41

Case T-446/05: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — Amann & Söhne and Cousin Filterie v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in industrial thread — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Concept of a single infringement — Definition of the market — Fines — Upper limit for the fine — Gravity and duration of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Rights of the defence — Guidelines on the method of setting fines)

24

2010/C 148/42

Case T-448/05: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — Oxley Threads v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in thread for automotive customers — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Guidelines on the method of setting fines)

24

2010/C 148/43

Case T-452/05: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — BST v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in industrial thread — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation — Non-contractual liability — Disclosure of confidential information — Damage — Causal link)

25

2010/C 148/44

Joined Cases T-456/05 and T-457/05: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — Gütermann and Zwicky v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in industrial thread — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Actual impact on the market — Duration of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Proportionality — Guidelines on the method of setting fines)

25

2010/C 148/45

Case T-103/06: Judgment of the General Court of 13 April 2010 — Esotrade v OHIM — Segura Sánchez (YoKaNa) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark YoKaNa — Earlier Community and national figurative marks YOKONO — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

26

2010/C 148/46

Case T-488/07: Judgment of the General Court of 15 April 2010 — Cabel Hall Citrus v OHIM — Casur (EGLÉFRUIT) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark EGLÉFRUIT — Earlier Community word mark UGLI and earlier national figurative mark ‘UGLI Fruit — but the affliction is only skin deep’ — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

26

2010/C 148/47

Case T-187/08: Judgment of the General Court of 20 April 2010 — Rodd & Gunn Australia v OHIM (Representation of a dog) (Community trade mark — Figurative Community trade mark representing a dog — Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration — Request for renewal of the mark — Application for restitutio in integrum — Article 78 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 81 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

27

2010/C 148/48

Case T-249/08: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2010 — Coin v OHIM — Dynamiki Zoi (Fitcoin) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark ‘Fitcoin’ — Earlier national, international and Community figurative marks ‘coin’ — Relative ground for refusal — Relevant public — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

27

2010/C 148/49

Cases T-274/08 and T-275/08: Judgment of the General Court of 22 April 2010 — Italy v Commission (EAGF — Clearance of the accounts of the paying agencies of Member States concerning expenditure financed by the EAGF — Sums recoverable from the Italian Republic where there is non-recovery within the time-limits specified — Meaning of financial consequences — Receipt of interest — Article 32(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005)

28

2010/C 148/50

Case T-361/08: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2010 — Peek & Cloppenburg and van Graaf v OHIM — Queen Sirikit Institute of Sericulture (Thai Silk) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the figurative Community trade mark Thai Silk — Earlier national figurative trade mark representing a winged creature — Admissibility of the action — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

28

2010/C 148/51

Case T-514/08: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2010 — Laboratorios Byly v OHIM — Ginis (BILLY’S Products) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark BILLY’S Products — Earlier Community and national word marks BYLY and byly — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

29

2010/C 148/52

Case T-7/09: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2010 — Schunk v OHIM (Presentation of part of a chuck) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community trade mark in the form of a presentation of part of a chuck with three grooves — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Lack of distinctive character acquired by use — Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

29

2010/C 148/53

Case T-225/09: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — Claro v OHIM — Telefónica (Claro) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community three-dimensional mark Claro — Earlier Community word mark CLARO — Inadmissibility of the appeal brought before the Board of Appeal — Articles 59 and 62 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Articles 60 and 64 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Rule 49(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

30

2010/C 148/54

Joined Cases T-529/08 to T-531/08: Order of the General Court of 13 April 2010 — Diputación Foral de Álava and Others v Commission (Application for annulment — State aid — Tax advantages — Recovery of State aid declared unlawful — Application of compound interest scheme — Confirmatory act — Inadmissibility)

30

2010/C 148/55

Case T-16/09 P: Order of the General Court of 23 March 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Staff case — Officials — Reasonable time for the submission of a claim for compensation — Lateness — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

31

2010/C 148/56

Case T-527/09: Action brought on 6 April 2010 — Ayadi v Commission

31

2010/C 148/57

Case T-117/10: Action brought on 5 March 2010 — Italy v Commission

32

2010/C 148/58

Case T-122/10: Action brought on 10 March 2010 — USFSPEI and Others v Council

33

2010/C 148/59

Case T-125/10: Action brought on 18 March 2010 — Amecke Fruchtsaft v OHIM — Uhse (69 Sex up)

34

2010/C 148/60

Case T-131/10: Action brought on 22 March 2010 — Saupiquet v Commission

34

2010/C 148/61

Case T-132/10: Action brought on 22 March 2010 — Communauté de communes de Lacq v Commission

35

2010/C 148/62

Case T-134/10: Action brought on 19 March 2010 — FESI v Conseil

36

2010/C 148/63

Case T-136/10: Action brought on 16 March 2010 — M v EMEA

37

2010/C 148/64

Case T-137/10: Action brought on 17 March 2010 — Coordination bruxelloise d'Institutions sociales et de santé (CBI) v European Commission

38

2010/C 148/65

Case T-139/10: Action brought on 26 March 2010 — Milux v OHIM (REFLUXCONTROL)

39

2010/C 148/66

Case T-140/10: Action brought on 26 March 2010 — Hans Günter Söns v OHIM — Settimio (GREAT CHINA WALL)

39

2010/C 148/67

Case T-145/10: Action brought on 24 March 2010 — Solae v OHIM — Délitaste (alpha taste)

40

2010/C 148/68

Case T-147/10: Action brought on 30 March 2010 — Meda Pharma v OHIM — Nycomed (ALLERNIL)

40

2010/C 148/69

Case T-148/10: Action brought on 25 March 2010 — Hynix Semiconductor v Commission

41

2010/C 148/70

Case T-149/10: Action brought on 25 March 2010 — Hynix Semiconductor v Commission

42

2010/C 148/71

Case T-150/10: Action brought on 26 March 2010 — Telefónica O2 Germany v OHIM — Loopia (LOOPIA)

43

2010/C 148/72

Case T-151/10: Action brought on 1 April 2010 — Bank Nederlandse Gemeenten NV v Commission

43

2010/C 148/73

Case T-152/10: Action brought on 30 March 2010 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM

44

2010/C 148/74

Case T-153/10: Action brought on 6 April 2010 — Schneider España de Informática v Commission

45

2010/C 148/75

Case T-156/10: Action brought on 6 April 2010 — Confederación de Cooperativas Agrarias de España and CEPES v Commission

46

2010/C 148/76

Case T-157/10: Action brought on 8 April 2010 — Barilla v OHIM — Brauerei Schlösser (ALIXIR)

47

2010/C 148/77

Case T-161/10: Action brought on 8 April 2010 — Longevity Health Products v OHIM — Tecnifar (E-PLEX)

47

2010/C 148/78

Case T-165/10: Action brought on 12 April 2010 — Grupo Osborne v OHIM — Confecciones Sanfertús (TORO)

48

2010/C 148/79

Case T-169/10: Action brought on 14 April 2010 — Grupo Osborne v OHIM — Industria Licorera Quezalteca (TORO XL)

49

2010/C 148/80

Case T-171/10: Action brought on 15 April 2010 — Slovak Telekom v Commission

49

2010/C 148/81

Case T-279/07: Order of the General Court of 23 March 2010 — France v Commission

50

2010/C 148/82

Case T-289/07: Order of the General Court of 23 March 2010 — Caisse Nationale des Caisses d'Epargne et de Prévoyance v Commission

50

2010/C 148/83

Case T-345/07: Order of the General Court of 23 March 2010 — Banque Postale v Commission

51

2010/C 148/84

Case T-431/08: Order of the General Court of 12 April 2010 — Bulur Giyim Sanayi ve Ticaret Sirketi v OHIM — Denim (VIGOSS)

51

2010/C 148/85

Case T-527/08: Order of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — Commission v TMT Pragma

51

2010/C 148/86

Case T-533/08: Order of the General Court of 19 March 2010 — Telekomunikacja Polska v Commission

51

2010/C 148/87

Case T-45/09: Order of the General Court of 22 March 2010 — Al Barakaat International Foundation v Commission

51

2010/C 148/88

Case T-256/09: Order of the General Court of 12 April 2010 — Aecops v Commission

51

2010/C 148/89

Case T-257/09: Order of the General Court of 12 April 2010 — Aecops v Commission

51

2010/C 148/90

Case T-26/10: Order of the General Court of 15 April 2010 — Alibaba Group v OHIM — allpay.net (ALIPAY)

51

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2010/C 148/91

Case F-2/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 April 2010 — Matos Martins v Commission (Staff case — Members of the contract staff — Call for expression of interest — Selection procedure — Pre-selection tests — Access to documents)

52

2010/C 148/92

Case F-104/08: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 April 2010 — Angelidis v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Vacant post — Execution of a judgment annulling the appointing decision — Legitimate expectations — Principle of officials’ entitlement to a career — Equal treatment — Principle of sound administration — Duty to have regard to the welfare of officials — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers)

52

2010/C 148/93

Case F-4/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 April 2010 — Britto Patricio Dias v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Posting — Reassignment — Interests of the service — Correspondence between grade and post — Rights of the defence — Reasons stated)

53

2010/C 148/94

Case F-102/08: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 March 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Despatch of the applicant’s personal effects — Action for damages — Action manifestly inadmissible — Action manifestly unfounded in law — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure)

53

2010/C 148/95

Case F-96/09: Action brought on 26 March 2010 — Cuallado Martorell v Commission

54

2010/C 148/96

Case F-22/10: Action brought on 1 April 2010 — Bombín Bombín v Commission

54

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN