19490 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 18, 2007 / Notices 

Docket No. ER06–1471, Westar Energy, 

Inc. 

Docket No. ER06–1467, Southwest 

Power Pool, Inc. 

Docket No. EL06–71, Associated Electric 

Cooperative, Inc. v Southwest Power 

Pool. 

Docket No. ER07–14, Southwest Power 

Pool, Inc. 

Docket Nos. ER07–211 and ER07–709, 

Southwest Power Pool, Inc. 

Docket No. ER07–314, Southwest Power 

Pool, Inc. 

Docket No. ER07–319, Southwest Power 

Pool, Inc. 

Docket No. ER07–603, Southwest Power 

Pool, Inc. 

These meetings are open to the 

public. 

For more information, contact John 

Rogers, Office of Energy Markets and 

Reliability, Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission at (202) 502–8564 or 

john.rogers@ferc.gov. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E7–7311 Filed 4–17–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

Notice of Guidelines for Submission of 

CDs, DVDs, and Other Electronic 

Media 

April 12, 2007. 

Take notice that the Commission is 

issuing notice of guidelines for 

submission of CDs, DVDs and other 

electronic media. An increasing number 

of traditionally paper documents 

submitted to the Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission (FERC) are now 

accompanied by one or more CDs, DVDs 

or other electronic media that contain 

all or part of the submission, or contain 

supplements to the submission. These 

guidelines address such submissions 

and require that, among other things, 

the CDs/DVDs contain the entire 

submission. 

These guidelines apply to documents 

that cannot be submitted through any of 

the Commission’s existing electronic 

gateways: The eFiling system, the 

eForms system, or the Electric Quarterly 

Reports (EQR) system. They thus are 

primarily intended for larger filings and 

those filings that contain Privileged, 

Critical Energy Infrastructure (CEII), or 

Non-Internet Public (NIP) information. 

Persons following these guidelines 

will be granted an automatic waiver of 

the number of paper copies and may 

instead submit the requisite number of 

copies of a filing on CD/DVD and reduce 

the number of paper copies to an 

original and two copies in most cases. 

These guidelines do not change any 

FERC requirements concerning service 

of submissions on customers, parties, or 

other persons. 

The guidelines will be posted at: 

http://www.ferc.gov/help/submissionguide.asp and updated when necessary 

to reflect revised procedures or changes 

in media. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E7–7312 Filed 4–17–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–8301–1] 

Clean Air Act Operating Permit 

Program; Petition for Objection to 

South Dakota State Operating Permit 

for Pope & Talbot, Inc., Lumber Mill, 

Spearfish, SD 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of direct final order. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces that 

the EPA Administrator has responded to 

a citizens’ petition asking EPA to object 

to a State operating permit issued by the 

South Dakota Department of 

Environmental and Natural Resources 

(DENR). Specifically, the Administrator 

has partially granted and partially 

denied the petition submitted by Jeremy 

Nichols, and the other Petitioners, to 

object to the issuance of the operating 

permit issued to Pope and Talbot, Inc., 

for its lumber mill, located in Spearfish, 

South Dakota. 

Pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of the 

Clean Air Act (Act), Petitioners may 

seek judicial review of those portions of 

the petition which EPA denied in the 

United States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate Circuit. Any petition for 

review shall be filed within 60 days of 

the date this notice appears in the 

Federal Register, pursuant to section 

307(d) of the Act. 

ADDRESSES: You may review copies of 

the final Order, the petition, and other 

supporting information at the 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, 

Colorado 80202–1129 after April 16, 

2007. EPA requests that you contact the 

individual listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to view 

the copies of these documents. You may 

view these documents Monday through 

Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. If you wish to 

examine these documents, you should 

make an appointment at least 24 hours 

before the visiting day. The final Order 

is also available electronically at the 

each of the following addresses: http:// 

www.epa.gov/region07/programs/artd/ 

air/title5/petitiondb/petitions/ 

pope_talbot_decision2006.pdf. and 

http://www.epa.gov/region07/programs/ 

artd/air/title5/petitiondb/ 

petitiondb2006.htm. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christopher Ajayi, Environmental 

Engineer, Air and Radiation Program, 

Office of Partnerships and Regulatory 

Assistance, Mail Code 8P–AR, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, 

CO 80202–1129, telephone (303) 312–

6320, or e-mail at 

ajayi.christopher@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Clean 

Air Act (Act) affords EPA a 45-day 

period to review and object to, as 

appropriate, operating permits proposed 

by State permitting authorities. Section 

505(b)(2) of the Act authorizes any 

person to petition the EPA 

Administrator within 60 days after the 

expiration of this review period to 

object to State operating permits if EPA 

has not done so. Petitions must be based 

only on objections to the permit that 

were raised with reasonable specificity 

during the public comment period 

provided by the State, unless the 

Petitioner demonstrates that it was 

impracticable to object during the 

comment period or that the grounds for 

the objection or other issue arose after 

this period. 

On April 11, 2006, the EPA received 

a petition from Petitioners requesting 

that EPA object to the issuance of the 

Title V operating permit issued by 

South Dakota Department of 

Environmental and Natural Resources 

(DENR) to Pope and Talbot, Inc., to 

operate a lumber mill in Spearfish, 

South Dakota (‘‘the Facility’’). 

The Petitioners request that EPA 

object to the issuance of the proposed 

permit and raise the following 

objections as the bases for their petition: 

1. Permit fails to ensure compliance 

with Carbon Dioxide (CO) emission 

limits, 

2. Permit lacks sufficient periodic 

monitoring of CO emissions, 

3. Permit may need ‘‘schedule of 

compliance’’ because it fails to ensure 

that CO emission limits are below 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

(PSD) levels and thus not in compliance 

with PSD requirements, 

4. Permit fails to ensure compliance 

with South Dakota State 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES