alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#  Significant Earthquakes - 2024

What makes an earthquake "significant"?

use the Earthquake Search

----

#### What makes an earthquake "significant"?

  Events in this list and shown in red on our real-time earthquake map and list are considered “significant events’, and they are determined by a combination of magnitude, number of Did You Feel It responses, and PAGER alert level.

Here is the equation:

**mag_significance** = magnitude * 100 * (magnitude / 6.5);**pager_significance** = red is 2000 : orange is 1000 : yellow is 500 : green is 0;**dyfi_significance** = min(num_responses, 1000) * max_cdi / 10;

**significance** = max(mag_significance, pager_significance) + dyfi_significance;

Any event with a **significance > 600** is considered a significant event and appears on the list.

Questions or comments?
FacebookTwitterGoogleEmailEarthquakesLatest EarthquakesLists, Maps & StatisticsSpecial Earthquakes, Earthquake Sequences, and Fault ZonesEarthquake Photo CollectionsSearch Earthquake CatalogReal-time NotificationsInformation by RegionHomeEarthquakesHazardsScienceMonitoringEducationDataMapsMultimediaPublicationsWeb ToolsSoftwareNewsConnectPartnersAboutSearchLegal
No. 49363.

#### Protests 8470-K, etc., of Alpha Distributing Co. et al. (San Francisco) .

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15.400 the court dismissed the protests.
(Reap. Dec. 9361)

#### Rogers Auto Machinery Importers, Ltd. *v.*United States

Entry No. 654.

(Decided March 25, 1959)

*Paul Harvey*for the plaintiff.

*George Goehr an Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*575Oliver. Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to a certain crankshaft grinding machine, Model K 2000, and accessories, that were exported from Copenhagen, Denmark, and entered at the port of ISTorf oik, Va.

The case has been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Oourt, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the involved Crankshaft Grinding Machine, Model K 2000 and accessories at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, is as follows:

> VALUE *Article*(Danish Krona)

> 1 A.M.O. Crankshaft Grinding Machine Model K 2000 45,400

> (U.S. Dollars) Each

> 1 Rapid power traverse for grinding wheel 428. 00

> 1 Special deluxe finish; red 87.00

> 1 Grinding wheel 30” x 8” x *%"*47. 00

> 2 Grinding Wheels 30” x 8” x 1%" & l'-i/a” 49. 00

> 3 sets of grinding wheel centres 8” 38. 00

> 1 set of V belts 16.00

> 1 Diamond tipped dressing tool 0.75 carat 22. 00

> All items less 10% discount, plus cost of export packing.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no. higher export value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise heréin involved at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER AGREED that this case may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find foreign value, as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for ap-praisement of the merchandise in question, and hold that such statutory value for the articles is as hereinabove set forth in the stipulation of submission. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Before the Second Division,

August 21, 1939

No. 41964.

#### Protest 425174-G of Mamie Conti Gowns, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items consist of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000100122
<NAME> TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,905,572
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     80,272
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         254,714
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       300,717
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  70,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,611,407
<COMMON>                                       640,644
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          (403,315)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 237,329
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,136,320
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   48,603
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    867,302
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                18,444
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 303,409
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,611,407
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      350,619
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             1,399
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     292,795
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     294,194
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         56,425
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               6,558
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  62,983
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        55,948
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,035
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    7,035
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          31,296
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0




</TABLE>
** **

(logo) C-III | C-III AssetManagement

 

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

**C-III Asset Management LLC**

 

 

Theundersigned, Barry Davis, President of C-III Asset Management LLC *(f/k/aCenterline Servicing LLC)*, the Special Servicer under that certain Pooling andServicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2015, relating to the **CitigroupCommercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC35, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2015-GC35**(the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”),hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.       a review of theactivities of the Special Servicer and of its performance under the Pooling andServicing Agreement during the calendar year 2017 (the "ReportingPeriod") has been made under the undersigned's supervision;

 

2.       to the best of theundersigned's knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer maintainedan effective internal control system relating to its servicing of the MortgageLoans serviced by it and has fulfilled in all material respects its obligationsunder the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Capitalized terms nototherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling andServicing Agreement.

** **

** **

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, as of the 1st day of March, 2018, I have hereuntosigned my name.

 

 

/s/ Barry Davis

**Barry Davis**, President

C-III Asset Management LLC, a

Delaware limited liabilitycompany

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CGCMT 2015-GC35
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

SHANE T. BORMAN, 

 Case No. 2:12-cv-509 

 Plaintiff, JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST 

 Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King 

v. 

 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

 Defendant. 

ORDER

 This action seeks review under 42 U.S.C. ' 405(g) of a final decision of the 

Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff’s applications for a period of disability, 

disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income. On July 8, 2013, the United 

States Magistrate Judge recommended that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed 

pursuant to sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. ' 405(g) and that this action be remanded to the 

Commissioner for consideration of the medical opinion of David Bousquet. (Report and 

Recommendation, ECF No. 22.) The Magistrate Judge determined that the record failed to show 

that the administrative law judge considered Mr. Bousquet’s medical opinion. (Id. at PageID# 

636.) The Magistrate Judge also recommended that Plaintiff’s motion to remand (ECF No. 19) 

be denied as moot in light of the recommendation to reverse the Commissioner’s decision. 

The Report and Recommendation advised the parties of their right to object to the 

Magistrate Judge’s recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so. 

Specifically, the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that failure to object to the Report and 

Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and 

of the right to appeal the District Court’s decision adopting the Report and Recommendation. 

Case: 2:12-cv-00509-GLF-NMK Doc #: 23 Filed: 07/30/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2 

(ECF No. 22 at PageID# 637.) Despite this advisement, there has been no objection to the 

Report and Recommendation. 

The Court ADOPTS AND AFFIRMS the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation. 

(ECF No. 22.) The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and the matter is 

REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings to consider the medical opinion of 

David Bousquet. The Court DENIES AS MOOT Petitioner’s motion to remand (ECF No. 19). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 /s/ Gregory L. Frost 

 GREGORY L. FROST 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case: 2:12-cv-00509-GLF-NMK Doc #: 23 Filed: 07/30/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          33,753
<SECURITIES>                                 4,934,087
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,202,235
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,988,164
<PP&E>                                      84,235,289
<DEPRECIATION>                              30,104,401
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              73,786,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,240,077
<BONDS>                                     42,089,489
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    183,430
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,656,743
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                73,786,465
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,602,878
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,077,584
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,169
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             795,522
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                724,603
<INCOME-TAX>                                   270,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            454,403
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   454,403
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.58
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit      32**

**UNISOURCE        ENERGY CORPORATION**

**TUCSON        ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY**

**STATEMENTS        OF CORPORATE OFFICERS**

|   | /s/                  James S.                  Pignatelli                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  James                  S.                  PignatelliChairman                  of                  the Board, President andChief                  Executive OfficerUniSource                  Energy CorporationTucson                  Electric Power Company |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | /s/                  Kevin P.                  Larson                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | Kevin                  P.                  LarsonSenior                  Vice                  President, Treasurer andChief                  Financial OfficerUniSource                  Energy CorporationTucson                  Electric Power Company           |
EXHIBIT 11
                                TSI INCORPORATED
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Three Months Ended December 31       Nine Months Ended December 31
                                                   ------------------------------       -----------------------------

                                                           1998              1997              1998              1997
                                                           ----              ----              ----              ----
<S>                                                 <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
BASIC

Weighted average common shares
 outstanding                                         11,263,270        11,659,613        11,353,498        11,587,909
                                                    -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------

Net earnings                                        $ 1,913,231       $ 1,678,017       $ 5,391,238       $ 4,930,887
                                                    -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------

Basic earnings per common share                     $       .17       $       .14       $       .47       $       .43
                                                    ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========


DILUTED

Weighted average common shares
 outstanding                                         11,263,270        11,659,613        11,353,498        11,587,909
                                                    -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------


Dilutive effect of employee stock options,
 and purchase awards--based on the
 treasury stock method                                  161,053           267,595           170,402           293,858
                                                    -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------


Weighted average common shares
 outstanding and dilutive shares                     11,424,323        11,927,208        11,523,900        11,881,767
                                                    -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------


Net earnings                                        $ 1,913,231       $ 1,678,017       $ 5,391,238       $ 4,930,887
                                                    -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------

Diluted earnings per common share                   $       .17       $       .14       $       .47       $       .41
                                                    ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========
</TABLE>




                                      -15-
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v THOMAS F. HOLLAND, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Appellant

9 USCMA 323, 26 CMR 103

*324No. 11,331

Decided June 6, 1958

*Captain Arnold I. Melnick*and *First Lieutenant Herbert R. Brown*were •on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel John G. Lee*and *First Lieutenant John E. Riecker*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

On his plea of guilty the accused was convicted of three lengthy unauthorized absences from his organization and two specifications alleging a breach of restriction from the same area. Assuming that the former are embraced within the latter1 the punishment is two years instead of two years and six months. Considering the sentence adjudged and that approved by the intermediate appellate authorities, we are of the opinion that remand of the case for reassessment of the sentence is not justified. United States v Helfrick, 9 USCMA 221, 25 CMR 483.

Accordingly, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Judges Latimer and Ferguson concur in the reswlt.

1

 United States v Modesett, 9 USCMA 152, 25 CMR 414.
# Official Journal C 451/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 451 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6329 December 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 451

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6329 December 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 451/01 | Euro exchange rates — 28 December 2020 | 1 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2020/C 451/02 | Public holidays 2021 | 2 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 451/01

Euro exchange rates — 28 December 2020

1

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2020/C 451/02

Public holidays 2021

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 451/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10066 — Carlyle/Flender) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2020/C 451/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10044 — Mississippi Ventures/Parcom/Hema) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 5 |
| 2020/C 451/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10107 — BlackRock/Mubadala/Goldman Sachs/Calisen) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 7 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 451/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10066 — Carlyle/Flender) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

3

2020/C 451/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10044 — Mississippi Ventures/Parcom/Hema) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

5

2020/C 451/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10107 — BlackRock/Mubadala/Goldman Sachs/Calisen) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CHARLES V. HORN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LITHOPOLIS CITY POLICE 

DEPARTMENT, eta/., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action 2:12-cv-00267 

Judge Michael H. Watson 

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers 

ORDER 

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the October 3, 2012 Report 

and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 15.) After 

conducting an initial screen of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(e), the Magistrate Judge recommended dismissal of Plaintiff's claims for failure to 

state a claim. The Magistrate Judge also recommended that this Court decline to 

exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any remaining state law claims. 

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge specifically advises 

the parties that the failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen 

days of the Report results in a "waiver of the right to de novo review ... by the District 

Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court." (Report and 

Recommendation 8, ECF No. 15.) The time period for filing objections to the Report 

and Recommendation has expired. Plaintiff has not objected to the Report and 

Recommendation. 

Case: 2:12-cv-00267-MHW-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 01/07/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge. Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing 

such objections expired, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to an initial screen, Plaintiff's claims contained 

within his Amended Complaint are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. Additionally, 

the Court declines to exercise jurisdiction over any remaining state law claims. The 

Clerk is DIRECTED to remove this case from the Court's pending case list. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

2 

MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

Case: 2:12-cv-00267-MHW-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 01/07/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>