alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 332 

Honoring the life of former Governor Carroll A. Campbell, and expressing 

the deepest condolences of the Senate to his family. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 14, 2005 

Mr. DEMINT (for himself and Mr. GRAHAM) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life of former Governor Carroll A. Campbell, 

and expressing the deepest condolences of the Senate 

to his family. 

Whereas the Senate has learned with sadness of the death of 

Governor Carroll Campbell; 

Whereas Carroll Campbell dedicated a lifetime of service to 

the State of South Carolina and the United States; 

Whereas Carroll Campbell served most honorably as the Governor of South Carolina from 1987 to 1995; 

Whereas from 1979, and until he was elected Governor of 

South Carolina, Carroll Campbell served with high moral 

character and integrity in the United States House of 

Representatives; 
2 

•SRES 332 ATS

Whereas Carroll Campbell was the first Republican elected to 

the House of Representatives for the 4th Congressional 

District since the Reconstruction period; 

Whereas during his service as Governor, Carroll Campbell 

provided extraordinary leadership and comfort to the citizens of South Carolina throughout the devastating aftermath of Hurricane Hugo and the rebuilding of the coast; 

Whereas Carroll Campbell improved the economy of South 

Carolina and the livelihood of its citizens by attracting 

world class businesses; 

Whereas Carroll Campbell worked diligently to restructure 

the Government of South Carolina, making it more accessible and responsive to its citizens; 

Whereas Carroll Campbell focused on improving the quality 

of public education provided by the State of South Carolina to all of its citizens; 

Whereas Carroll Campbell was as devoted to his principles as 

he was to his loving family, which included his wife Iris, 

his sons Carroll and Mike, and his grandchildren 

‘‘Blakeney’’ Herlong Campbell, Carroll ‘‘Berrett’’ Campbell, Michael ‘‘Rhodes’’ Campbell, and Marie ‘‘Riley’’ 

Campbell; and 

Whereas Carroll Campbell was a visionary who worked to improve the lives of all South Carolinians: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) extends its prayers and deepest condolences 

3 to the entire Campbell family; 
3 

•SRES 332 ATS

1 (2) honors the life of Carroll Campbell and ex2 presses profound gratitude for his years of public 

3 service; and 

4 (3) acknowledges with appreciation the 

5 unfaltering commitment and loyalty of Carroll 

6 Campbell to his family and the State of South Caro7 lina. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 72 (Monday, April 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7164]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP03-36-026]


Dauphin Island Gathering Partners; Notice of Negotiated Rate

April 10, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 5, 2007, Dauphin Island Gathering 
Partners (Dauphin Island) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the revised tariff sheets listed 
below to become effective May 6, 2007:

Thirty-Second Revised Sheet No. 9
Twenty-Sixth Revised Sheet No. 10

    Dauphin Island states that this tariff sheet reflects changes to 
its statement of negotiated rates tariff sheets.
    Dauphin Island states that copies of the filing are being served 
contemporaneously on its customers and other interested parties.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d3959681909cbdbfbabdb680a6a3a3bca1a793b5b6a1b0fdb4bca5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a2e4e7f0e1edcccecbccc7f1d7d2d2cdd0d6e2c4c7d0c18cc5cdd4">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-7164 Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Official Journal C 53/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 53 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 651 February 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 53

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 651 February 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 53/01 | Euro exchange rates — 31 January 2022 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 53/01

Euro exchange rates — 31 January 2022

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
- 51 - N ebraska S upreme C ourt A dva nc e S heets 302 N ebraska R eports STATE v . MUELLER Cite as 302 Neb. 51



### S tate of 

### N ebraska 

### , appellee 

### , v



### . Z a c hary 

### A

. M ueller 

### , appella n t



### . ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed January 18, 2019. No. S-17-387.

suppleme n tal opi n io n 

### Appeal from the District Court for Morrill County: L eo 

### P

. D obrovol n y 

### , Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled. Sarah P. Newell, of Nebraska Commission on Public Advocacy, for appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Stacy M. Foust for appellee.
H eavi c a n 

### , C.J., M iller


### ‐ L erma n 

### , C assel 

### , S ta c y 

### , F u n ke 

### , and P

apik 

### , JJ.

P er 

### C uriam



### . This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the appellant, Zachary A. Mueller, concerning our opinion in State v. Mueller

. 1 

### We overrule the motion, but we modify the opinion as follows: In the statement of facts section, we withdraw the word “no” in the second sentence in the 16th paragraph and substitute the word “another” in the quotation. 2

1 State v. Mueller , 301 Neb. 778, 920 N.W.2d 424 (2018).
2 Id . at 786, 920 N.W.2d at 432. Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 02/22/2019 08:07 AM CST- 52 - N ebraska S upreme C ourt A dva nc e S heets 302 N ebraska R eports STATE v . MUELLER Cite as 302 Neb. 51 

### In the analysis section, we withdraw the fifth paragraph 3 

### under the subheading “ Venue Instruction ” and substitute the following: We note that although Mueller argued that the court should have given a venue instruction based on § 29

- 1306, he did not actually tender such an instruction, and that therefore, to the extent Mueller asserts on appeal that the court erred when it refused a requested instruction, under the applicable standards set forth above, we do not ordi

narily review whether the “tendered instruction” was a correct statement of the law or whether it was warranted by the evidence. See State v. Swindle , 300 Neb. 734, 915 N.W.2d 795 (2018). Here, we can review whether the venue instruction the court actually gave was proper under the circumstances; a consideration of whether the instruction should have included the content of § 29

- 1306 is an incidental part of that analysis. The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. F ormer opi n io n modified



### . M otio n for reheari n g overruled



### . F reude n berg 

### , J., not participating.

3 Id. at 791, 920 N.W.2d at 435.
# Official Journal L 203/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 203 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5131 July 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 203

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5131 July 2008

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EC) No 704/2008 of 15 July 2008 on the conclusion of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania for the period 1 August 2008 to 31 July 2012 | 1 |
| Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania for the period 1 August 2008 to 31 July 2012 | 4 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EC) No 704/2008 of 15 July 2008 on the conclusion of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania for the period 1 August 2008 to 31 July 2012

1

Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania for the period 1 August 2008 to 31 July 2012

4

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
ADDENDUM TO PETITION FOR RELIEF

SFAR 108 3(1) on page 579, states the requirements for pilot training. Initial training must be completed 

as specified in Appendices A through D. SFAR 108 2(g) lists the requirements for Differences training for 

each model the instructor will be providing instruction for.

Initial training for the instructors will be conducted in accordance with Appendix A to SFAR 108 

paragraph (d) Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3. The minimum training the instructor will receive will be 20 

hours of ground instruction and 12 hours of flight instruction with a minimum of six hours at Level E. 

Additionally, the Final Phase Check as specified in SFAR 108 Appendix C (pages 585-589) will be 

conducted at Level E.

SFAR 108 5(4)(b) on page 580, stipulates the requirements for a Flight Instructor (Simulator/Flight 

Training Device).

Flight instructors will be required to meet the minimum total pilot time stipulated in SFAR 108 

5(4)(b)(3)(i) on page 581, which states instructors must have 2000 hours pilot-in-command and 800 

hours pilot-in-command time in multiengine airplanes.

SFAR 108 5(4)(b)(3)(ii) requires Simulator/Flight Training Device instructors to have, within the 

preceding 12 months, 50 hours of pilot-in-command experience or 50 hours providing simulator or flight 

training device instruction for the Mitsubishi MU-2B aircraft. This is the requirement from which we are 

requesting relief for initial instructor qualification. To meet the requirements of SFAR 108 5(4)(b)(3)(ii), 

SimCom would have a SFAR 108 qualified instructor supervising all training provided for the first 50 

hours of instruction provided by the new instructor. The supervising instructor would meet the 

qualification requirements sated in either SFAR 108 5(4)(b)(3)(i) or SFAR 108 5(4)(b)(3)(ii).
Before the Second Division,

October 24, 1945

No. 50612.

#### Protest 35515-K of American Straw Goods Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was agreed in open court that certain items of the merchandise consist of knotted hemp hats similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 46497. Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact and following the cited authority the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.
# Official Journal C 207A/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2009.207.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 207A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 522 September 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2009.207.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 207A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 522 September 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Medicines Agency |
| 2009/C 207A/01 | Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Medicines Agency

2009/C 207A/01

Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London)

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 9 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | (IT) |
| 12 | (DE/FR) |
| 13 | |
| 14 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 16 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 17 | (BG/ET/LT/LV/MT/RO) |
| 20 | |
| 21 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 23 | |
| 24 | (DE/FR/NL) |
| 25 | (BG/ET/LT/LV/MT/RO) |
| 28 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 34 | (FR) |
| 36 | (GA/EN) |
| 37 | |
| 38 | |
| 39 | (SV) |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | (EN) |
| 45 | |
| 46 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 47 | |
| 52 | (DA/FI/MT) |
| 58 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 59 | (DE/EN/ES/FR/PT/SV) |
| 62 | (BG/CS/LT/LV/MT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 63 | |
| 70 | |
| 71 | |
| 75 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 80 | (FR) |
| 84 | (BG/RO) |
| 86 | |
| 91 | |
| 93 | (BG/RO) |
| 94 | |
| 95 | |
| 97 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 98 | |
| 99 | (GA/EN) |
| 103 | |
| 104 | (CS/PL) |
| 105 | |
| 106 | |
| 107 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 109 | (ET) |
| 114 | |
| 115 | (PL) |
| 116 | |
| 117 | |
| 118 | (EL) |
| 119 | |
| 121 | (BG/CS/LT/LV/MT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 124 | (FI) |
| 130 | |
| 131 | (SV) |
| 132 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 137 | |
| 138 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 139 | |
| 142 | (EN/FR) |
| 143 | (ET/GA/PL/SL) |
| 145 | (BG/CS/LT/LV/RO/SK) |
| 149 | (EN) |
| 150 | |
| 155 | (BG/RO) |
| 160 | (BG/CS/LT/LV/MT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 165 | |
| 170 | (BG/CS/LT/LV/MT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 172 | (EN) |
| 174 | (EL) |
| 176 | (ES) |
| 177 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 189 | |
| 194 | |
| 207 | |

9

(DE/EN/FR)

10

(IT)

12

(DE/FR)

13

14

(DE/EN/FR)

16

(DE/EN/FR)

17

(BG/ET/LT/LV/MT/RO)

20

21

(DE/EN/FR)

23

24

(DE/FR/NL)

25

(BG/ET/LT/LV/MT/RO)

28

(DE/EN/FR)

34

(FR)

36

(GA/EN)

37

38

39

(SV)

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

(EN)

45

46

(DE/EN/FR)

47

52

(DA/FI/MT)

58

(DE/EN/FR)

59

(DE/EN/ES/FR/PT/SV)

62

(BG/CS/LT/LV/MT/PL/RO/SK)

63

70

71

75

(DE/EN/FR)

80

(FR)

84

(BG/RO)

86

91

93

(BG/RO)

94

95

97

(DE/EN/FR)

98

99

(GA/EN)

103

104

(CS/PL)

105

106

107

(DE/EN/FR)

109

(ET)

114

115

(PL)

116

117

118

(EL)

119

121

(BG/CS/LT/LV/MT/PL/RO/SK)

124

(FI)

130

131

(SV)

132

133

134

(DE/EN/FR)

137

138

(DE/EN/FR)

139

142

(EN/FR)

143

(ET/GA/PL/SL)

145

(BG/CS/LT/LV/RO/SK)

149

(EN)

150

155

(BG/RO)

160

(BG/CS/LT/LV/MT/PL/RO/SK)

165

170

(BG/CS/LT/LV/MT/PL/RO/SK)

172

(EN)

174

(EL)

176

(ES)

177

(DE/EN/FR)

189

194

207

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 9 June 2005

in Case C-135/04: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain (1)

(Conservation of wild fauna - Wild birds - Hunting periods - Hunting of woodpigeon during return journey in the province of Guipúzcoa)

(2005/C 193/10)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case C-135/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: G. Valero Jordana and M. van Beek) v Kingdom of Spain (Agents: N. Díaz Abad and M. Muñoz Perez) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 12 March 2004 — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C. W. A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta, C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), R. Schintgen and G. Arestis, Judges; L. A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; M. Ferreira, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 9 June 2005, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 106 of 30.4.2004.

----
#### T. J. McKenna *v.*United States

No. 7411.

Invoice dated Bridport, England, December 12, 1945.

Certified December 13, 1945.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 6, 1946.

Entry No. 737722.

(Decided October 17, 1947)

*Barnes, Bichardson & Colburn (Hadley 8. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge

(Abstract): This appeal for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concerns the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

The cited case has been incorporated herein by consent of the parties who further agree on a set of facts, embodied in a written stipulation submitting the present case, showing export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory value is the appraised value of the articles in question, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances in similar cases.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/19

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■ ■

■ ■

★

●

●

●

●

★

●

● ● ●
# L_2008297EN.01S00301.xml

| 6.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 297/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 297/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
# C_2007140EN.01000401.xml

| 23.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 May 2007 — SGL Carbon AG v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-328/05 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Leniency Notice - Principle non bis in idem)

Appeals

Competition

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

Guidelines on the method of setting fines

Leniency Notice

Principle non bis in idem

(2007/C 140/06)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: SGL Carbon AG (represented by M. Klusmann and F. Wiemer, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, M. Schneider, W. Mölls and H. Gading, Agents,)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 15 June 2005 in SGL Carbon v Commission (Joined Cases T-71/03, T-74/03, T-87/03 and T-91/03), in which the Court of First Instance partially dismissed the action seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2002) 5083 final of 17 December 2002 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC — Cartel in the specialty graphite market

SGL Carbon

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders SGL Carbon AG to pay the costs |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders SGL Carbon AG to pay the costs

---

(1)  OJ C 281, 12.11.2005.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trinity Capital Corporation, a New Mexico corporation (the “Company”), for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), William C. Enloe, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Trinity Capital Corporation and will be retained by Trinity Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| /s/ William C. Enloe                  |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| William C. Enloe                      |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| November 14, 2003                     |

 

1
- 1 -

Alexander Van der Bellen

Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

July 11, 2014

via email and regulations.gov

Brett Kruger

Acting Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Joint Application of Delta Air Lines, Inc., GoJet Airlines, LLC, and Société Air 

France

For Blanket Codesharing

Docket DOT-OST-2000-6939

Dear Mr. Kruger:

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all of the carriers on the service list to the above 

referenced application and there are no objections. In these circumstances, we urge that the 

application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: Brian Hedberg, DOT

 Bob Finamore, DOT

 info@airlineinfo.com