alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 18/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 18 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6420 January 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 18

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6420 January 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Decision No 1/EC/2020 of 10 December 2020 of the Joint Committee set up under the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and Japan related to the registration of a conformity assessment body under the Sectoral Annex on Telecommunications Terminal Equipment and Radio Equipment [2021/43] | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Decision No 1/EC/2020 of 10 December 2020 of the Joint Committee set up under the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and Japan related to the registration of a conformity assessment body under the Sectoral Annex on Telecommunications Terminal Equipment and Radio Equipment [2021/43]

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 13-605

________________________________________________________________________

SPACE COOPERATION

Solar Physics Satellite Project

Agreement Between the

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

and JAPAN

Extending the Agreement of

June 10, 2005

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Washington June 5, 2013
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent

evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof

or authentication thereof.”
 JAPAN

 Space Cooperation: Solar Physics Satellite Project

 Agreement extending the agreement of

 June 10, 2005.

 Effected by exchange of notes at Washington

 June 5, 2013;

 Entered into force June 5, 2013.
# Official Journal C 98/14 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 98 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6214 March 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 98

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6214 March 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 98/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — second supplement to the 37th complete edition | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 98/01

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — second supplement to the 37th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Dale H. Sizemore, Jr.,certify that:

 

1.        I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-QSB of Torotel, Inc.

 

2.        Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.        Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.        Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)          designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

 

b)         evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 daysprior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)          presented inthis quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.        Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)          all significant deficiencies in thedesign or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial dataand have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses ininternal controls; and

 

b)         any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.        Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterlyreport whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| /s/  Dale  H. Sizemore, Jr. |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |
| Dale H.  Sizemore, Jr.                |
| Chief  Executive Officer              |
| September 9,  2005                    |

 

----
8

13

13

11

11

11

5 0

4

6

0

14

0 50 100

km

Figure 5 - Postglacial depositional features. A majority of these features,shown in green,

formed at Holocene lake levels lower than at present. Estimated crestal depths of each

feature, in meters, are shown as red numerals. Also shown are the mapped limits of

postglacial sediments adapted from Sly and Lewis (1972), and Thomas, et al.(1976).
# Official Journal C 160/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 160 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 594 May 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 160

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 594 May 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 160/1 | Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,00 % on 1 May 2016 — Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2016/C 160/2 | List of central authorities nominated by the Member States to deal with the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from a Member State and applying Article 4 of Directive 2014/60/EU | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 160/1

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,00 % on 1 May 2016 — Euro exchange rates

1

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2016/C 160/2

List of central authorities nominated by the Member States to deal with the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from a Member State and applying Article 4 of Directive 2014/60/EU

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 160/3 | Notice of cancellation | 13 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 160/4 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 14 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2016/C 160/3

Notice of cancellation

13

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2016/C 160/4

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

14

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 371 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 371

 Designating July 22, 2006, as ``National Day of the American Cowboy''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2006

   Mr. Thomas (for himself, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Burns, Mr. 
 Allard, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Reid, Mr. Martinez, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Salazar, 
   Mr. Baucus, Mr. Craig, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Allen, and Mr. 
 Ensign) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating July 22, 2006, as ``National Day of the American Cowboy''.

Whereas pioneering men and women, recognized as cowboys, helped establish the 
        American West;
Whereas that cowboy spirit continues to infuse this country with its solid 
        character, sound family values, and good common sense;
Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, compassion, respect, a 
        strong work ethic, and patriotism;
Whereas the cowboy loves, lives off of, and depends on the land and its 
        creatures, and is an excellent steward, protecting and enhancing the 
        environment;
Whereas the cowboy continues to play a significant role in the culture and 
        economy of the United States;
Whereas approximately 800,000 ranchers are conducting business in all 50 States 
        and are contributing to the economic well being of nearly every county 
        in the Nation;
Whereas rodeo is the sixth most-watched sport in the United States;
Whereas membership in rodeo and other organizations encompassing the livelihood 
        of a cowboy transcends race and sex and spans every generation;
Whereas the cowboy is an American icon;
Whereas to recognize the American cowboy is to acknowledge the ongoing 
        commitment of the United States to an esteemed and enduring code of 
        conduct; and
Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys to their communities should be 
        recognized and encouraged: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates July 22, 2006, as ``National Day of the 
        American Cowboy''; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
Case No. 14,611.

#### UNITED STATES v. BLODGETT.

[35 Ga. 336.]

[See Append. Fed. Cas.]
Cite as 2016 Ark. 331 

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS 

Opinion Delivered October 6, 2016

IN RE COMMITTEE ON CHILD 

SUPPORT

PER CURIAM 

Circuit Judge Kenny Johnson of Warren and Mark D’Auteuil, Esq., of Russellville 

are reappointed to the Supreme Court Committee on Child Support for four-year terms to 

expire on November 30, 2020. Court of Appeals Judge Rita Gruber of North Little Rock, 

James A. McLarty III, Esq., of Newport, and Barbara Morris-Williams, Esq., of Little Rock

have each served two terms; however, in light of the fact that they have spent considerable 

time on the committee’s latest project and it is at a critical stage, they are reappointed for an 

additional one-year term to expire on November 30, 2017. The court thanks them for 

their continued service.
No. 54238.

#### Abouchar & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 694626-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. TX07-1-000] 

                    On March 15, 2007, the Commission issued an Order Directing Interconnection and Transmission Services and Approving Settlement Agreement in                     *Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.,*                     118 FERC ¶ 61,199 (2007) (March 15 Order).                 

On March 30, 2007, Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. filed a motion requesting suspension of the obligations the Commission imposed in the March 15 Order, pending final Commission action in this proceeding. 

Upon consideration, the obligations the Commission imposed in the March 15 Order are suspended pending further Commission action in this proceeding. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

 [FR Doc. E7-7576 Filed 4-19-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
No. 50215.

#### Protests 57083-K, etc., of James G. Hardy & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should bo converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 24, 2017

Order 

Clerk

May 24, 2017

154358(55)

STEVEN ILIADES and JANE ILIADES,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

SC: 154358

v COA: 324726 

Oakland CC: 12-129407-NP

DIEFFENBACHER NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiffs-appellees to extend the time 

for filing their supplemental brief to June 9, 2017, is GRANTED.
RE: Can we push the 11:30 mtg on NO2 to noon? 

Lydia Wegman to: King, Heidi R. 01/20/2010 11:21 AM

Cc: Charlotte Bertrand, dmancini

Bcc: Tricia Crabtree

At this point we have nothing to discuss on the number of monitors. Can you confirm to me that you have 

no additional comments on the entire rulemaking package and the RIA and that the comment response I 

sent you last Friday takes care of all the interagency comments? Thanks. 

"King, Heidi R." EPA requested this time. You wrote yesterday t... 01/20/2010 11:05:06 AM

From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/20/2010 11:05 AM

Subject: RE: Can we push the 11:30 mtg on NO2 to noon?

EPA requested this time. You wrote yesterday that EPA was concerned with the 

number of monitors and wanted to discuss this further, but if you have nothing 

to discuss then we don't need to meet today.

Thanks,

heidi

-----Original Message-----

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:20 AM

To: King, Heidi R.

Cc: Bertrand.Charlotte@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: RE: Can we push the 11:30 mtg on NO2 to noon?

Do we have issues to discuss other than the numbers of monitors? That is an 

issue we're not ready to discuss at noon. Please let me know.

Thanks.

 

 From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov> 

 To: Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Date: 01/20/2010 10:05 AM 

 Subject: RE: Can we push the 11:30 mtg on NO2 to noon? 

Sure – Lydia, is noon ok with you?

From: Bertrand.Charlotte@epamail.epa.gov [ 
mailto:Bertrand.Charlotte@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:05 AM

To: King, Heidi R.

Cc: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Re: Can we push the 11:30 mtg on NO2 to noon?

My calendar is free, will you patch us in?

 

 From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov> 

 To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Charlotte 

 Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Date: 01/20/2010 09:57 AM 

 Subjec Can we push the 11:30 mtg on NO2 to noon? 

 t: 

Looks like my 11am will run late.

Would it be possible to talk at noon instead of 11:30?

Thanks,

heidi
# Four th Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 3, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00315

- CV

IN RE John J. ROCKEY

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

On May 15 , 2 0 17, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. On July 31, 2017, Relator filed a Supplemental Petition for Writ of Mandamus and an Emergency Motion for Temp orary Stay. Real Party in Interest filed a response on August 2, 2017. The court has considered the petition, supplemental petition

, and response

, and is of the opinion Relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for temporary relief and emergency stay are DENIED

. The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on August 3, 2017

.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of August, 2017

.

___________________________________ Luz Estrada Chief Deputy Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016

- CI

- 19967, styled John J. Rockey v. Mubeena Rockey , pending in the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas.
1 Rebecca Legett

From: **Rebecca Legett** Sent: **Monday, December 22, 2008 4:37 PM** To: **charles.llenza@ee.doe.gov** Cc: **Aris Marantan** Subject: **ECM Motor Manufacturers for Walk-in coolers and fre ezers** 

**Charlie,**

**There are currently at least 3 manufacturers of ECM motors that could be used as evaporator fan motors**  **for a walk-in. The details are below, and I have also attached mor**  **e information.**

**Rebecca Legett Navigant Consulting, Inc.**  **Office 202-481-8471 rebecca.legett@navigantconsulting.com** 

**--------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------**  **---------------**

**Parent company name** : GE **Motors subsidiary** : Regal-Beloit (If applicable) **Contact name** : N/A **Contact position** : N/A **Motor model** : ICE 59 **Attachment** : ICE59Release.pdf

**Is this an Electronically Commutated Motor (Brushle ss DC Motor)?**  Yes.

**Is this motor under 1 hp and less than 460 V?** Yes; this motor is 1/15 hp and uses line voltage (n ominally 115 V).

**Could this motor be used as an evaporator fan motor in a walk-in cooler or freezer?**  Yes.

**Is the motor manufactured by this company?** Yes.2 --------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------ **Parent company name** : Minebea **Motors subsidiary** : NMB Tech (If applicable) **Contact name** : Irvine Sloan **Contact position** : Program Manager **Motor model(s)** : BLDC40, BLDC65 **Attachment(s)** : BLDC_motor_details.pdf, BLDC40SG.pdf

**Is this an Electronically Commutated Motor (Brushle ss DC Motor)?**  Yes.

**Is this motor under 1 hp and less than 460 V?** Yes; these motors range from 0.025 to 0.26 hp and 1 2 to 48 V supply voltage.

**Could this motor be used as an evaporator fan motor in a walk-in cooler or freezer?**  Yes.

**Is the motor manufactured by this company?** Yes.

**--------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------**  **--------------------------------------------- Parent company name**  : Ametek **Motors subsidiary** : Pittman (If applicable) **Contact name** : Lou Tecsi **Contact position** : Engineering Department **Motor model(s)** : 2.5” Series, 3.55” Series, 5.25” Series **Attachment(s)** : 2%2e5 BLDC Motor[1].pdf, 3%2e55 BLDC Motor[1].pdf , 5%2e25 BLDC Motor[1].pdf

**Is this an Electronically Commutated Motor (Brushle ss DC Motor)?**  Yes.

**Is this motor under 1 hp and less than 460 V?** Yes; these motors range from 0.068 to 0.59 hp and f rom 24 to 27.6 V supply voltage.

**Could this motor be used as an evaporator fan motor in a walk-in cooler or freezer?**  Yes.

**Is the motor manufactured by this company?** Yes.

ECM_motors.doc 5%2e25 BLDC

Motor[1].pdf 3%2e55 BLDC

Motor[1].pdf 2%2e5 BLDC

Motor[1].pdf BLDC_motor_details .pdf ICE59Release.pdf BLDC40SG.pdf
No. 54229.

#### D. P. Harris Hardware & Manufacturing Co. *v.*United States,

protests 771782-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Before the First Division,

January 30, 1942

No. 46901.

#### Protest 67299-K of Strauss-Eckardt Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the tablecloths and napkins in question are the same as those involved in T. D. 50277 (1) the claim at 30 percent under paragraph 911 (b) was sustained.