P. 1



# OAR Box 1865 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 55 ) IV-H- 2
Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 12/3/20089:15:29AM

Sheet 55of 105P. 2

IV-H- 2 ^tmO sr„ ^ / A \ UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y | ^W ^ 3 Offic e o f Ai rQualityPlannin g an d Standard s X^aWam*^ Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 1 \ m o ^ 4 SE P 198 7

MEMORANDU

M SUBJECT : Reques t fo r OMB Clearanc e o f Reportin g an d Recordkeepin g Requirement s Associate d wit hFina l Performanc e Standard s (SO2 ) fo r Industrial-Commercial-Institutiona l Stea m Generatin g Unit s (Subpar t Db ) FROM : Geral d A . Emison , Directo r

Offic e o f Ai r Qualit y Plannin g an

d Standard s (MD-10 ) TO : Thoma s E . Kelly , Actin g Directo r

Offic e o f Standard s an d Regulation s (PM-223 ) THRU : Janin e Westhause n

Offic e o f Ai r an

d Radiatio n(ANR-443 ) Attache d ar e th e Standar d For m SF-8 3 (four copies ) an d supportin g statemen t (fou r copies ) fo r requestin g clearanc e o f th e reportin g an d recordkeepin g requirement s associate d wit hth e fina l performanc e stan dard s (SO2 ) fo r industrial-commercial-institutiona l stea m generatin g unit s (Subpar t Db) . Th e SF-8 3 an d supportin g statemen t hav e bee n revise d base d o

n additiona l informatio nobtaine d sinc e submitta l o f th e Steerin g Committee package . Pleas e review

thi s reques t an

d forwar d i t t o th e Offic e o f Managemen t an

d Budget . I f yo u hav e an y questions concernin g thi s submittal , pleas e contac t Fre d Porte r (FT S 629-5251 ) o r Wal t Stevenso n (FT S 629-5264) . 2 Attachment s
cc : Ke n Durke e (MD-13 ) Rober t Kolbinsk y

(MD-13 ) Harve y Nozic k (ANR-443 ) (w/ o attachments ) Fre d Porte r (MD-13 )P. 3

Standar d for m 8 3 (B*v.S«ptem5« f 1983 ) 

## Reques t fo r OM B Revie w
Importan t Read instruction s befor e completin g form
. O o no t us e th e sam e S F 8 3 t o reques

t bot h a n Executiv

e Orde r 1229 1 revie wan d approva l unde r th e Paperwor k

Reductio n Act
. Answer al l question s i n Par t I
. I f thi s reques

t i s fo r revie

wunde r E.O
. 12291 , complet

e Par t I I an d sig n th e regulator y certification
. I f thi s reques t i s fo r approva l unde r th e Paperwor k Reductio n Ac

t an d 5 CF R 1320 , ski p Par

t il , complet

e Par t II I an d sig n th e paperwor k certification
. Sen d thre e copie s o f thi s form , th e materia ! t o b e reviewed , an d f

o paperwork—thre e copie s o f th e supportin g statement , to : Offic e o f Informatio n an d Regulator y Affairs Offic e o f Managemen t an d Budge t Attention : Oocke

t Library , Roo m 320 1 Washington , D

C 2050 3
PAR T I.—Complet e Thi s Par t fo r Al l Requests
. 1
. Department/agenc

y and Bureau/offic

e originatin g reques

t 

### EPA/Offic e o f Ai r an

d Radiatio n

3
. Nam e o

f perso n wh o ca n bes

t answe r question s regardin g thi s reques t Walte r H
. Stevenso n 2
. Agenc y cod e
6 0 Telephon e numbe r < FT S ) 629-526 4 4
. Titl e o f informatio n collectio n o r rulemakin g NSP S fo r Industrial-Commercial-Institutiona l Stea m Generatin g Unit s (SO2 )

5
. Lega l authority fo r informatio n collectio n or 4 2 USf i 741 1 A 7A1 A
6. Affecte d publi c (check all that apply) 1 D Individual s o r household s 2 D Stat e o r loca l governments rul e (cite United States Coda, Public

Law, or Executive

Order)
.or

3 D Farm s 4 C J Businesse

s o r othe r for-profi t 

### 6d f 7 D Federa l agencie s o r employees Non-profi t institution s Smal l businesse

s o r organization s PART II.—Complet e Thi s Par t Onl y i f th e Reques t i s fo r OM B Revie wUnde r Executive Orde r 1229 1
7
. Regulatio n Identifie r Numbe r (RIN )

, or , Non e assigned D 8
. Typ e o f submissio n (check

one in each category) Ct-wifteatlon 1 D Majo r 2 D Nonmajo r Stage otdexmhpmarit 1 D Propose

d o r draf t 2 D rlnalc*irrtarimfirujl,witJipriorproposa l 3 D Oral«interi m fina L withou t prio r proposal Type of review requested 1 D Standar d 2 D Pendin g 3 D Emergenc

y 4 D Statutor

y o r judicia l deadlin e 9
. CF R sectio n affecte d

CF » 10
. Ooe s thi s regulatio n contai n reportin g o r recordkeepin g requirement s tha t require OM B approva l unde r th e Paperwor k Reductio n Ac

t

t

Certificatio n fo r Regulator y Submission s I n submittin g thi s reques t fo r OM B review , th e authorize d regulator y contact an d th e progra m officia l certif y tha t th e requirement s o f E.O
. 1229 1 an d any applican t polic y directive s hav

e bee n complie d with
. Signatur e o f progra m officia l

Signature o

f authorize d regulator

y contac t Oat e

Dat e

12. (OMB

use only)
Previou s e3T>on j obsolet e NSN7S4O-00-634-403

4 8 3 10 8 StandirdFerm83(»ev
. 9 Prescribe d b y ( 5 CF R 132 0 in d E O .2P. 4

PAR T ill.—Complet e Thi s Par t Onl y I f th e Reques t I s fo r Approva l of a Collectio n

o f Informatio n Unde r th e Paperwor k Reductio n Ac t an d 5 CF R 1320
. i3.Abstract—Describ

e needs , use s an d aHecte d publi c m s o word s o r les s Owner

s an d operator s o f industrial-Commercia l - institutiona l stea m generatin g unit s wit h hea t inpu t capacitie s greate r tha n 2 9 M W (10 0 millio n Btu/hour ) wil l b

e require d t o continuousl y monito r sulfu r dioxid e emission s an d submi t quarterl y report s o f emission s an d qualit y assuranc e tes t results
. Thi s informatio n i s necessar y t o ensur e tha t affecte d facilitie s compl y wit h th e SO ? emissio n standard s establishe d unde r th e NSP S : , —. 14
. Typ e o

f information i collectio n (check only one) Information

collections

no t contained

In rules 1 D Regula r submissio n Information

collections

contained

m rules 3 D Existin g regulatio n (no change proposed) 4 D Notic e o f propose d rulemakin g (NPRM ) 5 E Final , NPR M wa s previousl y publishe d 2 Q Emergency submrsstonfcert/f/cafweffac/wd }
6 Fina l o r interi m fina l withou t prio r NPR M ' A D Regula r submissio n B Q Emergency submissio n (ctrtftationattactted) 7
. Ente r dat e o f expecte d o r actua l Federa l Registe r publicatio n a t thi s stag e o f ru:emaki.-. g (month.Hay.year):

Dec
. 1
. 198 7
15
. Typ e of revie wrequeste d (check only one) l E Newcollectio n 2 D Revisio n o f a currentl y approve d collectio n 3 O Extensio n o f th e expiratio n dat e o f a currentl y approve d collectio n withou t an y chang e i n th e substanc e o r i n th e metho d o f collectio n 4 O Reinstatemen t o f a previousl y approve d collectio n fo r whic h approva l ha s expire d 5 D Existin g collectio n i n us e withou t a n OM B contro l numbe r 16
. Agenc y report for m numbers ) (include itandard/opfiiona

/ for m numbers))

17
. Annua l reportin g o r disclosure burde n 1 Numbe r of respondent s 2 Numbe r o f response s pe r responden t . . 3 Tota l annua l response s (line I times line 2) 4 Hours pe r respons e 5 Tota l hours flinc 3 nme*//r » 4 )
. . . . 22
. Purpos e of informatio n collectio n (cnec * a s many as apply) 1 D Applicatio n fo r benefit s 2 D Progra

m evaluatio n 3 D Genera l purpos e statistic s 4 0 9 Regulator

y o r complianc e S Q Progra m plannin g o r managemen t 6 D Researc

h 7 D Audi t 23
. Frequency o f recordkeepin g o r reportin g fenecf c all that apply) 1 Q Recordkeepin g Reporting 2 D O n occasio n 3 D Weekl y 4 D Monthl y 5 u D Quarterl y 6 D Semi-annuall y 7 D Annuall y 8 D Bienniall y 9 D Othe r (describe;. - 18
. Annua l recordkeepin g burde n 1 Numbe r o f recordkeeper s . 2 Annua l hour s pe r recerdkeeper
. ..... . 3 Tota l recordkeepin g hours 0»n e J times line 2) 4 Recordkeepin g retentio n perio d 19
. Tota l annua l burde n 1 Requested time 17-S plus line 18-3). 2 I n curren t OM B inventor y . . . . 3 Differenc e {Vn e J Jes

s <tn e 2 J
. . . Explanation

ot difference 4 Progra m chang e 5 Adjustmen t _ 2 y« r

20
. Curren t (most

recent) OM B contro l numbe r o r commen t numbe r 2060-013 6 2 1
. Requeste d expiratio n dat e Dec. 1 , 199

0 24
. Respondents ' obligatio n t o compl y (check the strongest

obligation

that applies. 1 D Voluntar

y 2 D Require d t o obtai n o r retai n a benefi t 3 B Mandatory 25
. Are th e respondent s primaril y educationa l agencie s o r institution s o r i s th e primar y purpos e of th e collectio n relate d t o Federa l educatio n programs ? D Yes Q N l 26
. Does th e Does th e agency use samplin g t o select respondent s o r does th e agency recommen d o r prescrib e th e us e o f samplin g o r statistica l analysi s ,- , yt b y respondents ' U Yes 13 N i 27
. Regulator

y authorit y fo r th e informatio n collectio n ~ " ~ 4 0 rr a 6 0 ,;or . F R ; or . Othe r (specify): Paperwor k

Certificatio n " " —• I n submittin g thi s reques t fo r OM B approval , th e agenc y head , th e senio r officia l o r a n authorize d representative , certifie s tha t th e requirement s of 5 CF R 1320
. V rnvac y Act , statistica l standard s o r directives , an d an y othe r applicabl e informatio n policy directive s have bee n complie d with
.

. Signature o

f progra m c"ic;s l " ' " " —__—_ _ Director , 0AQ

P Signatur e o f agency ?-••:«
. th e senio r officia l o r a n authorise d representative i iP. 5

SF-8 3 SUPPORTINGSTATEMEN T ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENC Y STANDARD S O F PERFORMANC E FO RNE W STATIONARYSOURCE S Industrial-Commercial-Institutiona l Stea m Generatin g Unit s

A . JUSTIFICATIO N 1 . Nee dfo r th e Informatio nCollection . Th e EPA i s charge d unde r Sectio n11 1 o f th e Clea nAi r Act , a s amended , t o establis hstandard s o f performanc e fo r new

stationar y

source s tha t reflect : ...applicatio no f th e bes t technologica l syste m o f continuou s emissio n reductio nwhic h(takin g Int o consideratio nth e cos t o f achievin g suc h emissio nreduction , an y nonai r qualit y

healt han

denvironmenta l impac t an d energ y requirements ) th e Administrato r determine s ha s bee nadequatel y demonstrate d[Sectio n111(a)(1)] . Inaddition , Sectio n114(a ) state s that : ...th e Administrato r ma y requir e an

y perso nwh o own s o r operate s an y emissio nsourc e o r wh o i s subjec t t o an y requiremen t o f thi s Ac t .. . t o (A ) establis han

dmaintai nsuc hrecords , (B ) mak e suc hreports , (C ) Install , use , an dmaintai nsuc hmonitoring equipmen t o r methods , (D ) sampl e suc h emission s (i naccordanc e wit hsuc hmethods , a t suc hlocations , a t suc h intervals , an

di nsuc hmanne r a s th e Administrato r shal l prescribe) , an d (E ) provid e suc hothe r Information , a s h e ma y reasonabl y

require . Th e ful l tex t o f Sectio n11 4 1 s reproduce dinAttachmen t A . Inth e Administrator' s judgment , Industrial-commercial-Institutiona l stea m generatin g unit s havin g hea t inpu t capacit y o f 2 9 M W (10 0 millio n Btu/hr ) o r large r caus e o r contribut e significantl y t o ai r pollutio ntha t
ma y reasonabl y

b e anticipate dt o endange r publi c healt ho r welfare . Therefore , ne w

sourc e performanc e standard s (NSPS ) fo r emission s o f sulfu r dioxid e (SO J ar e bein g promulgate dfo r thi s sourc e category . Industrial-commercial-institutiona l stea m generating unit s ar e th e larges t sourc e categor y fo r emission s o f S0 2 liste donth e EPA priorit y

lis tP. 6

publishe dinAugus t 21 , 1979 . Sulfu r dioxid e emission s fro m a typica l coal-fire d industrial-commercial-institutiona l stea m generatin g uni t regulate dunde r a

naverag e Stat e implementatio npla n(SIP ) limitin g emission s o f SO - ar e approximatel y 75 0 Mg/y r (83 0 tons/yr) . Sulfu r dioxid e emission s fro

m a typica l oil-fire d industrial-commercial-institutiona l stea m generatin g uni t regulate dunde r a naverag e SI P ar e approximatel y 98 0 Mg/y r (1,08 0 tons/yr) . I t 1 s projecte dtha t approximatel y 60 0 ne w industrial commercia l -Institutiona l stea m generatin g unit s subjec t t o th e standard s wil l b e constructe ddurin g th e firs t 5 year s followin g adoptio no f th e standards , mos t o f whic hwil l b e locate di nclos e proximit y t o urba nareas . Thi s growt hrat e 1 s amon g th e highes t fo r an y sourc e categor y

considere d fo r regulatio nunde r NSPS . Certai nreport s ar e necessar y t o enabl e th e Administrato r t o identif y
new source s subjec t t o th e standards , t o ensur e tha t th e best.demonstrate d technologica l (BDT ) system o f continuou s emissio nreductio n1 s bein g used , an dt o determin e whe nsource s ar e no t i ncomplianc e wit hth e standards . Additionally , source s mus t maintai nrecord s t o demonstrat e tha t th e emissio n reductio nsystem

1 s operate dan

dmaintaine d1 na manne r consisten t wit hth e bes t technologica l system o f continuou s emissio nreductio nan dtha t th e S0 ~ emissio nlimit s ar e achieve dona continuou s basis . Ne w sourc e performanc e standard s fo r particulat e matte r (PM ) an d nitroge noxide s (N

O ) emission s fro

m industrial-commercial-Institutiona l stea m generatin g unit s wer e promulgate donNovembe r 25 , 198 6 (5 1 FR42768) . Becaus e man y

o f th e reportin g an

drecordkeepin g requirement s associate d wit h th e promulgate dSO , standard s coincid e wit hthos e containe di nth eP. 7

promulgate dNSP S fo r P M an dNO x(OM

B Clearanc e Numbe r 2060-0072) , many o f th e action s take nt o compl y wit hth e PM/N0 Xreportin g requirement s wil l als o satisf y th e SO - reportin g requirement s (discusse dbelow) . Onc e promulgated , th e standard s fo r SO- , PM , an dN O wil l b e covere dina singl e regulatio n unde r Subpar t D bo f 4 0 CF RPar t 60 . Onl y th e incrementa l burde nassociate d wit hth e SO - standard s i s estimate dan ddiscusse dinthi s supportin g statement . 2 . Descriptio nan

dPractica l Utilit y

o f th e Informatio nCollectio n Activity . (a ) Informatio nCollectio nActivit y fo r Industrial-Commercial Institutiona l Stea

m Generatin g Units . Unde r thi s regulation , owner s o r operator s o f industrial-commercial-institutiona l stea m generatin g unit s woul db e require dt o submi t notificatio no f construction , anticipate dan d actua l startu pdates , an dphysica l o r operationa l change s t o existin g facilities , a s require dunde r th e NSP S Genera l Provisions , 4 0 CF R60.7 . Al l
o f thes e requirement s hav e bee naccounte dfo r i nth e Informatio ncollectio n reques t fo r th e promulgate dP M an dN O standards . Report s o f initia l performanc e tes t an

dInitia l performanc e evaluation s o f th e NO continuou s emissio nmonitorin g system s (CEMS ) ar e already required . Th e fina l SO standar drequire s S0 2 CEM S b e Installe dan doperate da t al l facilitie s firin g coa l o r oil . Th e SO - CEM S performanc e evaluatio nca nb e combine d wit hth e NO xCEM S evaluation . Afte r Initia l startup , th e regulatio nrequire s continuou s monitorin g o f emission s a t th e inle t an doutle t t o th e SO - contro l devic e an dcalculatio n
o f averag e percen t reductio nan demissio nrat e o na 30-da y rollin g averag eP. 8

basis . Th e firs t 30-da y rollin g averag e afte r initia l startu pwoul dserv e
a s th e initia l performanc e test ; a ne w 30-da y averag e percen t reductio nan d emissio nrat e woul db e calculate da t th e en do f eac hstea

m generatin g uni t operatin g day . (Althoughno t credite di nth e burde ncalculations , th e fina l regulation s allow

th e us e o f low-sulfu r complianc e fuel s fo r coal - o r oil-fire dstea

m generatin g unit s wit hannua l capacit y factor s fo r coa l o r oi l o f 3 0 percen t o r less . Th e fina l standard s als o allow abbreviate d (24-hour ) complianc e test s fo r stea m generatin g unit s wit hannua l capacit y factor s fo r oi l o f 1 0 percen t o r less . Thes e provision s reduc e th e burde n
o f th e initia l complianc e test s an dsubsequen t monitorin g fo r thes e units. ) Th e fina l regulatio nrequire s eac haffecte dfacilit y t o submi t quarterl y

reports . Thes e report s woul dInclud e eac h30-da y rollin g averag e percen t reductio nan

dSO - emissio nrat e calculate ddurin g th e quarter , a s wel l a s identificatio no f an y period s fo r whic hdat a wer e exclude d fro m thes e calculations , th e reaso nfo r thi s exclusion , an da descriptio no f correctiv e actio ntaken . I f th e percen t reductio nrequiremen t o r emissio n limi t 1 s exceede db

y an y 30-da y average , th e quarterl y repor t woul dInclud e th e reaso nfo r th e exceedanc e an da descriptio no f correctiv e actio ntaken . Inaddition , informatio nrequire dunde r 4 0 CF RPar t 60 , Appendi xF , Procedur e 1 (Qualit y

Assuranc e Requirement s fo r Gaseou s Continuou s Emissio n Monitorin g System

Use dfo r Complianc e Determinations ) (5 2 F R21003 , Jun e 4 , 1987 ) woul db e submitte dwit hth e quarterl y reports . Thi s woul dInclud e results o f al l quarterl y accurac y

assessment s performe do neac hCEM S an d Informatio nIdentifyin g any period s durin g whic hth e CEM S wa s operatin g wit h
anexcessiv e degre e o f measuremen t drift , a s determine db y dall y calibratio nP. 9

drif t tests . Record s o f al l emissio nmeasurement s an dquarterl y

report s woul dbe maintaine db

y th e affecte dfacilit y fo r a perio do f 2 years . (b ) EP A Us e o f Dat a Collected . Th e informatio nwil l b e use db y th e Agenc y t o (1 ) identif y

new , modified , o r reconstructe dsource s subjec t t o th e standards , (2 ) ensur e tha t BD T i s bein g applie dt o reduc e emission s fro m th e affecte dsources , (3 ) ensur e tha t th e emissio ncontro l system i s bein g properl y operate dan

dmaintained , an

d(4 ) ensur e tha t th e affecte dsource s
ar e bein g operate dincomplianc e wit hth e applicabl e emissio nstandards . I f th e informatio nrequire db y th e standard s wer e no t collected , th e Agenc y woul dhav e n o mean s fo r ensurin g tha t complianc e wit hth e NSP S i s achieve dan

dmaintaine db

y th e new , modified , o r reconstructe dsource s subjec t t o th e regulation . Unde r thes e circumstances , anowne r o r operato r coul delec t withou t consequenc e t o reduc e expense s b y no t Installing , maintaining , o r operatin g th e contro l technolog y require db

y th e standards . Inth e absenc e o f th e informatio ncollectio nrequirements , th e standard s coul db e enforce donl y throug hcontinuou s on-sit e inspectio nb y regulator y agenc y personnel . Consequently , no t collectin g th e Informatio nwoul dresul t i n(1 ) greatl y

Increase d resourc e requirement s for enforcemen t personne l o r (2 ) th e inabilit y

t o enforc e th e standard s o na continuou s basis . 3 . Minimizin g Burden . Th e burde nt o respondent s ha s bee nminimize d b y requirin g th e collectio nan dreportin g o f onl y

tha t informatio nwhic hth e Agenc y believe s 1 s essentia l t o ensur e tha t continuou s complianc e wit hth e standard s i s bein g achieved . A s discusse dbelow , th e specifi c procedure s fo r dat a collection , dat a reduction , an dreportin g hav e bee nestablishe ds o
a s t o minimiz e th e burde nt o respondents .P.1 0

Mos t o f th e dat a require dt o b e collecte dan dreporte dca nb e generate d automaticall y

wit havailabl e electroni c dat a processin g equipment , thu s minimizin g manpowe r requirements . Suc hequipmen t ca nautomaticall y perfor m th e necessar y

calculation s an

dforma t th e result s ina manne r suitabl e fo r submitta l i

nth e quarterl y

complianc e report . Th e cost s o f thi s equipmen t hav e bee ninclude dinth e tota l CEM S costs . I naddition , n o specifi c forma t fo r require dreport s ha s bee nestablished , allowin g eac hresponden t t o selec t th e leas t burdensome approac ht o dat a collectio nan dreportin g base d
onsite-specifi c conditions . Th e majo r burde nIte

m associate dwit hth e propose drulemakin g 1 s th e requiremen t t o compl y

wit hth e Appendi xF , Procedur e 1 qualit y assuranc e testin g an

dreportin g requirements , whic hrequire s th e CEM S operato r t o conduc t quarterl y

CEM S accurac y

audits . Th e Agenc y

believe s tha t quarterl y audit s o f accurac y

ar e essentia l t o ensur e vali dCEM S complianc e results . T o reduc e th e testin g burde nonth e respondents , Procedur e 1 require s a relativ e accurac y

tes t onc e a yea r an

dallow s th e us e o f les s expensive , surrogat e auditin g procedure s fo r th e othe r thre e quarters . Tw o technique s fo r performin g th e surrogat e quarterl y audit s ar e Include d inProcedur e 1 allowin g CEM S operator s t o selec t a procedur e tha t I s les s burdensom e i n ligh t o f site-specifi c circumstances . Th e dall y

calibratio ndrif t dat a collectio nprocedur e require di n
» Procedur e 1 1 s th e same a s currentl y require d1nth e Genera l Provision s o f 4 0 CF R60.13(d)(1) , an dthes e value s ca nb e generate dwit havailabl e electroni c dat a processin g equipment . Procedur e 1 additionall y require s tha t th e result s o f th e calibratio ndrif t measurement s b e compare dwit hP.1 1

specifi c limit s t o determin e th e acceptabilit y o f th e CEM S responses . Th e Agenc y considere drequirin g th e respondent s t o calculat e an drepor t statisticall y

determine dprecisio nvalue s using th e CEM S respons e drif t data . Thi s procedur e wa s rejecte da s bein g to o burdensome fo r th e minima l increas e ininformatio ntha t woul db e supplied . 4 . Nonduplication . Duplicatio ninth e reportin g o f emission s dat a unde r th e fina l standard s woul dbe minimal , i f i t occur s a t all . Becaus e th e standard s appl y

onl y t o new units , dat a onemission s fro m thes e facilitie s ar e no t currentl y bein g collecte dan

dd o no t duplicat e existin g dat a collectio nactivities . Inmor e tha n9 5 percen t o f th e cases , th e enforcemen t o f NSP S ha s bee n delegate dt o Stat e ai r pollutio ncontro l agencies . Insuc hcases , th e actua l emissio ndat a report s require db y th e standard s woul db e submitte dt o th e appropriat e Stat e agency , an dno t directl y

t o EPA . Thus , ther e 1 s minima l possibilit y

fo r th e submitta l o f duplicat e Informatio nt o Stat e agencie s an

dEPA . Inthos e limite dcase s wher e Stat e agencie s hav e no t requeste ddelegatio no f NSP S enforcement , I t woul dtheoreticall y b e possibl e tha t owner s o r operator s woul db e require dt o repor t Informatio nt o th e Stat e whic hduplicate s tha t require db y th e Agency . However , th e genera l provision s o f 4 0 CF RPar t 6 0 provid e tha t submissio no f a copy o f th e Stat e
o r loca l repor t t o th e Administrato r wil l satisf y th e reportin g requirements . Finally , EPA 1 s usin g an

dwil l continu e t o us e th e Federa l Informatio nLocato r System (FILS ) t o ensur e tha t duplicatio no f Federa l data-gatherin g effort s doe s no t occur .P.1 2

A s discusse dpreviously , many o f th e reportin g an

drecordkeepin g requirement s containe dinth e SO - regulatio ncoincid e wit hthos e i nth e promulgate dstandard s fo r P M an dN0 X . Wher e thi s occurs , a singl e repor t fo r al l thre e pollutant s i s required . Thi s ha s bee nreflecte di nth e burde n estimate s an

dcos t analyse s containe dinthi s supportin g statement . 5 . Consideratio no f Alternatives . Th e continuou s monitorin g requirements unde r th e fina l standard s ar e necessar y t o ensur e tha t source s subjec t t o th e SO - standard s ar e 1ncontinuou s complianc e wit hth e standards . N o othe r dat a ar e currentl y availabl e tha t coul db e use dt o demonstrat e thi s continuou s compliance . Reportin g o f onl y

exces s 30-da y

averag e emissio nrate s (an dpercen t reductio nlevels ) rathe r tha neac hdall y 30-da y rollin g averag e valu e wa s considere ddurin g developmen t o f th e standards , bu t wa s no t adopted . Reportin g o f onl y

exces s emissio nvalue s doe s no t noticeabl y reduc e th e informatio nburden , bu t woul dnoticeabl y reduc e enforceabilit y o f th e standards . Inaddition , becaus e emission s dat a wil l b e collecte dan d generate dusin g electroni c dat a processin g equipment , an y Increase d burde n associate dwit hreportin g al l 30-da y rollin g averag e value s pe r quarte r (9 0 dat a values ) 1 s minimal . Thes e dat a wil l ensur e tha t bot hth e sourc e
an dEPA ar e familia r wit hth e genera l performanc e o f th e facilit y an d identif y ina timel y

manne r period s o f noncompliance . Quarterl y

reportin g 1 s considere dt o b e th e minimu m reportin g frequenc y whic hwil l provid e enforcemen t agencie s wit htimel y Informatio nnecessar y t o
ensur e tha t source s ar e i ncontinuou s complianc e wit hth e SO - standards . Thi s reportin g burde nwil l b e minima l considerin g th e magnitud e o f emission s

8P.1 3

fro mindustrial-commercial-institutiona l stea mgeneratin g units , and considerin g tha t th e reporte d informatio n wil l b e generate d usin g electroni c dat a processin g equipment
. Semiannua l and annua l reportin g period s wer e considered , bu t wer e determine d t o b e to o infrequen t t o b e compatibl e wit h timel yenforcemen t o f th e standard
. 6
. Minimizin g Burde n fo r Smal l Business
. Th e informatio n collectio n burde n o n smal l businesse s wil l b e negligibl e o r nonexistent
. Becaus e o f th e lowe r siz e cutof f o f 2 9 M W (10 0 millio n Btu/hr ) hea t Inpu t capacit y unde r th e standard , few , i f any , smal l businesse s ar e expecte d t o b e affecte d b

yth e standard
. I n th e even t tha t a smal l busines s woul d b e subjec t t o th e standard , and therebysubjec t t o th e complianc e testin g and reportin g requirements , th e Impact s woul d b e smal l becaus e th e cost s o f emissio n measuremen t and reportin g requirement s unde r thi s rulemakin g represen t les s tha n 1 percen t
o f th e tota l annualize d stea m generatin g uni t costs
. 7
. Consideratio n o f Collection
. Fou r o f th e informatio n requirement s unde r th e fina l S0 2 standard s ar e alread ysatisfie d b yth e fina l PM/N O regulatio n and th e burde n associate d wit h thes e wa s addresse d i n th e informatio n collectio n reques t submitte d wit h tha t regulation
. Thes e requirement s ar e for :

notificatio n o f constructio n o r reconstruction , notificatio n o f physica l o r operationa l change , notificatio n o f anticipate d startup , and notificatio n o f actua l startup
.P. M

I naddition , fou r othe r informatio nrequirement s unde r th e SO - standard s ar e one-time onl y

notification s o r report s an dcanno t be performe dona les s frequen t basis . Thes e are :

notificatio no f demonstratio no f CEMS , notificatio no f Initia l performanc e test , repor t o f initia l performanc e test , an d repor t o f demonstratio no f CEMS . Onl y th e quarterl y

emission s repor t (Includin g result s o f th e Appendi xF relativ e accurac y

test s an

ddall y drif t assessment s discusse dabove ) 1 s a repetitiv e requirement . Thes e report s ar e necessar y t o ensur e complianc e wit hth e standard s ona continuou s basis . A s discusse d above , th e quarterl y frequenc y

o f thes e report s wa s chose nb y th e Agenc y

a s th e perio dtha t wil l provid e anadequat e margi no f assuranc e tha t facilitie s subjec t t o th e standar dwil l no t operat e fo r extende dperiod s i nviolatio no f th e standards . Consequently , dat a collectio nan dreportin g o na les s frequen t basi s woul ddecreas e th e margi no f assuranc e tha t facilitie s ar e i n complianc e wit hth e standard s an dIncreas e th e ris k t o publi c healt han d welfare . I naddition , becaus e th e dat a ar e collecte dan danalyze db

y automate dequipment , th e burde nassociate dwit hgenerating , copying , an d submittin g thes e dat a o na quarterl y versu s semiannua l basi s 1 s minimal . 8 . Paperwor k Reductio nAc t Guidelines . Ther e ar e n o specia l circumstance s tha t requir e th e Informatio ncollectio nt o b e conducte di na
manne r inconsisten t wit hth e guideline s In5 CF R1320.6 . 9 . Consultations . Fro m th e outset , th e comment s o f Intereste d person s hav e bee nsolicite dInformulatin g th e fina l standards . A n

1 0P.1 5

importan t elemen t ineffort s t o solici t publi c comment s durin g developmen t
o f NSP S i s th e review

o f staf f technica l analyse s an dpolic y recommendation s b y th e Nationa l Ai r Pollutio nContro l Technique s Advisor y Committe e (NAPCTAC) . Thi s advisor y committe e i s compose do f representative s o f Stat e
an dloca l governments , regulate dindustries , environmenta l organizations , an dtechnica l consultant s wit hexpertis e inai r pollutio ncontro l technologies . Severa l presentation s t o NAPCTAC wer e mad e t o solici t th e view s o f committe e member s an

dintereste dmember s o f th e public . Additiona l meeting s
wer e hel dwit haffecte dIndustrie s a t severa l time s durin g developmen t o f th e standard s t o solici t comment s onth e monitorin g an dreportin g requirements . Tabl e 1 i s a representativ e sampl e o f person s consulte din developin g th e standards . I naddition, a publi c commen t perio dwa s hel d fro m Jun e 19 , 1986 , t o Octobe r 2 , 1986 , t o solici t comment s onth e propose d standards . A

publi c hearin g wa s hel donSeptembe r 4 , 1986 , t o allow intereste dpartie s th e opportunit y fo r ora l presentatio no f views . Thes e comment s wer e carefull y considere dindevelopin g th e fina l standards . 10 . Confidentiality . Th e dat a require db y th e reportin g requirement s
ar e principall y

emission s dat a an

dar e no t confidential . However , i f an y informatio n1 s submitte dt o EPA fo r whic ha clai m

o f confidentialit y

i s made , th e Informatio n1 s safeguarde daccordin g t o th e Agenc y policie s se t fort hi n4 0 CF RPar t 2 , Subpar t B - Confidentialit y o f Busines s Information . 11 . Sensitiv e Questions . No t applicable . Informatio nconsist s o f emission s dat a andothe r simila r informatio ntha t hav e bee ndetermine dno t t o b e private .

1 1P,16

_

12 . Cos t t o th e Governmen t an dt o th e Respondents . (a ) Cos t t o th e Federa l Government . Th e regulatio nresult s i ncost s t o th e Federa l Governmen t associate dwit hth e analysi s o f th e reporte d information . Publicatio nan ddistributio no f th e reporte dInformatio nar e par t o f th e Complianc e Dat a System tha t i s operate dan

dmaintaine db

y EPA' s Stationar y

Sourc e Complianc e Division . Examinatio no f th e record s t o b e maintaine db

y th e respondent s wil l occu r Incidentall y a s par t o f th e periodi c Inspectio no f source s tha t 1 s a par t o f EPA' s overal l complianc e
an denforcemen t program . Th e averag e incrementa l annua l cost s t o th e Federa l governmen t associate dwit hth e S0 2 reportin g requirement s durin g eac ho f th e nex t 3 year s ar e expecte dt o be abou t $290,200 . Thes e cost s ar e base d onan averag e salar y

o f $14.5 0 pe r hou r (Grad e 10 , Ste p7) , 2,08 0 workin g hour s pe r year , an

da 11 0 percen t overhea drate , an dar e inadditio nt o th e cost s identifie d i

nth e PM/N0 Xstandar dsubmitta l fo r thi s sourc e category . Th e breakdow no f thes e cost s b

y categor y

1 s show nbelow : Cos t Categor y

£gs l Direc t personne l cost s $138,20 0 Overhea d(11 0 percent ) $152.00 0

Tota l $290,20 0 Th e basi s o f thi s estimat e 1 s presente di nTabl e 2 . (b ) Cos t t o Respondents . Th e cost s fo r a singl e representativ e responden t t o compl y

wit hth e SO - recordkeepin g an dreportin g requirement s
ar e summarize dinTabl e 3 . Th e Incrementa l annua l cos t t o a representativ e responden t associate dwit hthes e recordkeepin g an dreportin g requirement s

1 2P.1 7

woul db e abou t $35,00 0 t o $49,00 0 inYea r 1 an d$17,00 0 t o $30,00 0 in subsequen t years , dependin g o nth e typ e o f CEM S used . Thes e cost s ar e based
o na naverag e salar y

o f $14.5 0 pe r hou r an da 11 0 percen t overhea drate . Th e cost s t o compl y

wit hth e Appendi xF qualit y assuranc e requirement s ar e base do nal l wor k bein g performe db y contracto r personne l a t $5 0 pe r hour . A s show ninTabl e 3 , muc ho f th e calculate dcost s t o respondent s ar e one-time onl y

cost s associate dwit hinitia l performanc e demonstrations . Th e onl y recurren t cost s t o respondent s ar e thos e associate dwit hcollectin g an d maintainin g th e require demission s dat a an dsubmittin g quarterl y complianc e report s an

dAppendi xF qualit y

assuranc e reports . Becaus e th e dat a collectio nan

dmaintenanc e activitie s ar e performe dusin g th e sam e automate d equipmen t a s wer e already require dinth e fina l standard s fo r P M an dNO , onl y minima l additiona l time 1 s necessar y fo r operatio nan

dmaintenanc e o f CEM S i ncomplianc e wit hth e SO - standards . 13 . Estimatio no f Responden t Burden . A s mentione dabove , th e informatio ncollectio nrequirement s includ e th e followin g one-tim e onl y reports : notificatio no f constructio nor reconstruction , notificatio no f physica l o r operationa l changes , notificatio no f anticipate ddat e o f Initia l startup , notificatio no f actua l dat e o f initia l startup , notificatio no f demonstratio no f CEMS , an d notificatio no f th e dat e o f th e initia l performanc e test .

1 3P.1 8

Th e firs t fou r o f thes e d o no t conve y an y incrementa l burde nfo r th e SO informatio ncollectio nrequest , sinc e the y ar e completel y

satisfie db

y th e PM/NO reportin g requirements . I nadditio nt o th e one-time onl y requirements , th e followin g periodi c recordkeepin g an

dreportin g activitie s ar e required : quarterl y

complianc e reports , quarterl y

Appendi xF qualit y

assuranc e report , an

d records o f performanc e tes t emission s dat a collecte dusin g th e CEMS . A s mentione dabove , th e recordkeepin g burde nassociate dwit hth e SO standar dha s bee nInclude d 1nth e Informatio ncollectio nreques t fo r th e fina l P M an dNO standards . Thes e informatio ncollectio nrequirement s wer e applie d t o th e 12 1 fossil-fuel-fire d Industrial-commercial-Institutiona l stea m generatin g unit s projecte dt o b e constructe deac hyea r i nth e 5-yea r perio dfollowin g promulgatio no f th e standard . Th e annua l burde nt o al l respondent s subjec t t o th e SO - standard s 1 s estimate dt o b e 150,17 2 person-hour s (7 2 person-years ) pe r yea r durin g th e firs t 3 year s followin g promulgatio n
o f th e standard . Tabl e 3 provide s a breakdow no f th e component s tha t mak e
upth e tota l burden . Th e burde nma y var y fro m responden t t o responden t a s show ni nth e table , dependin g o nth e typ e o f CEM S employe db y th e * respondent . Fo r a numbe r o f reasons , thi s annua l responden t burde nleve l shoul d b e considere da

n"uppe r limit " estimat e o f possibl e burde nImpacts . First , th e America nBoile r Manufacturer s Associatio n(ABMA ) suggest s th e projecte d

1 4P.1 9

12 1 fossil-fuel-fire dstea m generatin g unit s pe r yea r overestimate s actua l
new stea m generatin g uni t construction , thereb y overestimatin g th e industry burde nassociate dwit hthi s regulation . Second , Subpar t Dbwil l supersed e Subpar t D fo r ne

w stea m generatin g unit s wit hhea t inpu t capacitie s greater tha n7 3 M

W (25 0 millio nBtu/hour ) an dburde ncredit s whic hcoul dhav e bee n claime dfo r th e Subpar t D monitorin g requirement s (whic hwoul drequir e thes e unit s t o Instal l CEM S eve ni nth e absenc e o f th e Subpar t O bestimates . Thi s woul dhav e further reduce dth e Industr y burde nestimate s associate dwit hth e fina l SO - standards . Third , th e fina l standard s allow "complianc e fuels " t o b e fire dan

dabbreviate dcomplianc e testin g fo r stea m generatin g unit s operatin g a t lo

w capacit y

factor s fo r coa l o r oil . A s note dpreviously , thes e les s stringen t requirement s hav e no t bee nInclude di nthes e burde n estimate s an

dwoul dfurthe r reduc e th e industr y burden . Finally , thes e burde nestimate s assume tha t al l o f th e projecte d 60 5 ne w fossil-fuel-fire dsteam generatin g unit s woul dfir e eithe r coa l o r oil , an dtha t n o natura l ga s (fo r whic hther e ar e n o continuou s monitorin g
o r reportin g requirements ) woul db e used . I t i s difficul t t o determin e exactl y how muc hnatura l ga s wil l b e fire dinth e future , bu t estimate s hav e indicate dtha t a s muc ha s 8 0 percen t o f th e ne w fossil-fuel-firedstea m generatin g unit s projecte dt o b e constructe dove r th e nex t 5 year s coul dbe gas-fired . Thus , th e Industr y burden s presente d1nTabl e 3 represen t a conservativ e estimate . Becaus e o f th e conservativ e natur e o f th e estimate s presented , n o additiona l burde nha s bee nadde dfo r th e possibl e 2 0 t o 3 0 mixed-fuel-fire d (coal/woo do r oil/wood ) steam generatin g unit s tha t ma y b e covere dunde r th e fina l SO - standards .
1 5P.2 0

14 . Reason s fo r Chang e i nBurden . Th e annua l burde nestimat e fo r th e promulgate dstandar di s 150,74 2 person-hours . Sinc e thi s i s a new standard , ther e i s n o previou s burde nleve l associate dwit hit . I t woul dIncreas e th e PM/NO burde nleve l o f 141,16 7 person-hour s b y 150,74 2 fo r a tota l Subpar t Dbburde no f 291,90 9 person-hour s pe r year . A s discusse dabove , thi s i s a conservativ e estimate . 15 . Scheduling . Th e dat a submitte db y respondent s wil l b e use dt o monito r complianc e wit hth e SO - emissio nstandar dan dwil l b e entere dInt o th e Complianc e Dat a System (CDS) . A

specifi c time schedul e fo r th e collectio no f informatio n1 s no t applicable . Th e dat a ar e no t bein g requeste dfo r an

y currentl y

schedule dsurve y

o r report . 16 . Standar dIndustria l Classificatio n(SIC ) Code . Thi s standar dwil l appl y t o stea m generatin g unit s tha t ar e operate dunde r numerou s industria l classification s (SI C codes) . Any industria l source s tha t emplo y a stea m generatin g uni t wit ha hea t Inpu t capacit y greate r tha n2 9 M

W (10 0 millfo n Btu/hour ) tha t fire s coa l o r oi l woul db e subjec t t o th e SO - compliance , reporting , an

drecordkeepin g requirements . Th e fiv e SI C group s coverin g th e majorit y o f respondent s ar e SI C Code s 2 0 (foodan dkindre dproducts) , 2 2 (textil e products) , 2 6 (pape r an dallie dproducts) , 2 8 (chemical s an d allie d products) , and2 9 (petroleu m an dcoa l products) . B . COLLECTION S O F INFORMATION EMPLOYINGSTATISTICA L METHOD S Thi s sectio n1 s no t applicabl e becaus e statistica l method s ar e no t use d inth e dat a collectio nassociate dwit hthi s regulation .

1 6P.2 1



### TABL E 1 . REPRESENTATIVE SAMPL E O F PERSON S CONSULTE D O N TH E DEVELOPMEN T O F TH E INDUSTRIAL-COMMERCIAL-INSTITUTIONAL STEA M GENERATIN

GUNI T NSP S FO

RSO Nam e
Barne yCamponesch i
Do n Culbertso n Mar k Wad e Bil l Qua n Vivia n Mclntir e Ellyc e H111berr y Benjami n Roger s Georg e Gree n Joh n Pinkerto n

Bil l Axtma n Affiliatio n
FM C Corporatio n Chevro n Gul f 01 1 Californi a Dept
. o f Healt h Service s Tennesse e Eastma n Ker n Count y(Calif. ) Ai r Pollutio n Contro l Distric t Genera l Motor s Publi c Servic e o f Colorad o Nationa l Counci l o f th e Pape r Industr yfo r Ai r and Strea m Improvement , Inc
. America n Boile r Manufacturer s Associatio n (ABMA ) Telephon e Numbe r (312 ) (805 ) (805 ) (916 ) (615 ) (805 )
(313 ) (303 ) (212 )

(703 ) 843-170 0 762-755 0 395-631 1 324-180 7 229-304 5 861-368 2

857-500 0 571-751 1 532-900 0

522-735 0



### 1 7TABL E 2 . ANNUA L ESTIMAT E O F DIREC T PERSONNE L COS T T O TH E FEDERAL GOVERNMEN T T O IMPLEMEN T INDUSTRIAL-COMMERCIAL-INSTITUTIONAL STEA M GENERATING UNI T NSP S FOR SO *

Activit y Hour s Assumption s

1 . Review

notificatio no f constructio no r reconstructio n 2 . Revie w

notificatio no f anticipate d startup 3 . Revie w

notificatio no f actua l startup 4 . Revie w

notificatio no f physica l o r operationa l chang e 5 . Revie w

notificatio no f initia l performanc e tes t

6 . Revie w

notificatio no f continuou s Monitorin g system 7 . Revie w

repor t o f initia l performanc e tes t 8 . Revie w

continuou s eo n1 to r In g syste a perforaanc e 9 . Revie w

quarterl y

reports i Exces s ealsslo nreport s Appendi xF O

A dat a assessmen t report s 0 0 0 0 24 2

24 2 96 8 ,93 6

.79 2 |

36 2 0

0 0 0 3.50 0

3.50 0 14,00 0 28.00 0

84.00 0
S.20 0 Already covere d b

y PM/N O regulation . Se e 1 . above . Se e 1 . above . N o reconstructe d source s anticipated . 2 hour s pe r report , 12 1 ne w source s subjec t t o perforaanc e tes t pe r year . 2 hour s pe r report , 12 1 source s pe r year . 8 hour s pe r report , 12 1 source s pe r year . 1 6 hour s pe r report , 12 1 source s pe r year .

8 hour s pe r report , 4 report s pe r sourc e pe r year , averag e o f 18 1 source s pe r reportin g period . 0. 5 hour s pe r report , 4 report s pe r sourc e pe r year , averag e o f 18 1 source s pe r reportin g period .

Base d o n a scenari o o f 10 0 percen t o f al l unit s eaploytn g FGD . S14.5 0 pe r hou r direc t personne l cos t (rounde d t o neares t SlOO) . c 12 1 ne w source s pe r yea r average d ove r th e 3-yea r period .

r oTABL E 3
. ESTIMATE D ANNUA L COS T AN D BURDEN T

O INDUSTR

Y T O IMPLEMENT INDUSTRIAL-COMMERCIAL-INSTITUTIONA L STEA M GENERATIN G UNI T NSP S FO R S0 „

Burde n Ite a Person-Hour s Pe r Occurrenc e Occurrence s

Pe r Responden t Pe r Yea r Person-Hour s

Pe r Responden t Pe r Yea r Cos t

Pe r Responden t <») a Respondent s

Pe r Yea r Person-Hour s

Pe r Yea r Cos t

Pe r Yea r ($> a

1 . Application s 2 . Survey s an

d Studie s 3 . Reportin g Requirement s A . Rea d Instruction s B . Require d Activitie s

- Initia l perforaanc e tes t

- Deaonstratlo n o f CEMS

- Appendi xF annua l relativ e accurac y tes t

- Appendi xF quarterl y audits :

- I n sit u CEM S (RAA )

- Extractiv e CEM S (CGA ) C Creat e Information 0 . Gathe r Existin g Informatio n E . Writ e Repor t

- Notificatio n o f construction / reconstruction

- Notificatio n o f physical/operationa l change s

- Notificatio n o f anticipate d startup

- Notificatio n o f actua l startup

- Notificatio n o f demonstratio n o f CEM S

- Notificatio n o f Initia l perforaanc e tes t

- Repor t o f Initia l perforaanc e tes t

- Repor t o f deaonstratlo n o f CEM S

- Quarterl y

emissio n repor t

- Appendi xF Q

A dat a assessmen t repor t N/ A N/ A

25 0 35 0 14 6

12 5 3 6 Se e 3 B Se e 3 E 1 1 1

3 3 25 0

35 0 14 6

37 5 10 8 30 u

7.612 ° 10.657 ° 7.300 c

18.750* - 5,400 c

0 r\ o d 2 2 Se e 3 B Se e 3 B 1 6 1 1 0

0 1 1

4 4 0

0 2 2

6 4 4 4 0

61 °

1,95 0 2.200 c 12 1

12 1 12 1 18 1

4 5 13 6 12 1

30.25 0 42.35 0 26,42 6

16.87 5 14,68 8

0 0 12 1 12 1

18 1 18 1 0

0 24 2 24 2

11.58 4 7.96 4 3.68 4

921.11 2 1,289.55 7 1.321.300 c

843, 1S0 T 734.400 c

0 0 7,36 9 7,36 9

352,73 3 398.20 0 (Continued )TABL E 3 . ESTIMATE D ANNUA L COS T AND BURDE N

T O INDUSTR

YT O IMPLEMEN T INDUSTRIAL-COMMERCIAL-INSTITUTIONAL STEA M GENERATING UNI T NSP S FO R S O (Concluded )

Burde n Ite a Person-Hour s Pe r Occurrenc e Occurrence s Person-Hour s Cos t Cos t

Pe r Responden t Pe r Responden t Pe r Responden t Respondent s Person-Hour s Pe r Yea r Pe r Yea r Pe r Yea r ($) " Pe r Yea r Pe r Yea r ($ )

4 . Recordkeepin g Requirement s A . Rea d Instruction s B . Pla nActivitie s C . Implemen t Activitie s D . Develo p Recor d System E . Tim e t o Ente r Informatio n

- Record s o f startup , shutdown , malfunctio n

- Record s o f al l measurement s an d Informatio nrequire d F . Tim e t o Trai nPersonne l G . Tim e fo r Audit s Se e 3 A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 0 d N/ A N/ A

Total : Al l Burde nIt a 1,23 4 (967 )f.h 48,62 1 (35.271 ) f. h 62 9 (362) 9 ' h30.20 0 (16,850) 9 ' h 150.74 2 5.879.47 4

a Cost s ar e base d o n a $14.5 0 pe r hou r pa y rat e plu s an overhea d rat e o f 11 0 percent . Thus , th e tota l cos t pe r hou r I s assume d t o b e $30.45 . One-tim e onl y

costs . c Base d o n contracto r cost s o f $5 0 pe r hour . Already covere d I

nth e PN/NO xreportin g requirements . e N o modifie d o r reconstructe d unit s anticipated . f Yea r 1 . ^Year s 2 an d 3 . Nuabe r I

nparenthese s I s fo r unit s equippe d wit hextractiv e CEMS ; nuabe r no t Inparenthese s I s fo r unit s equippe d wit hIn-slt u CEMS .P.2 5



### AttachMn t
_ £ TH E CLEA N AI RACT 1



### ' TITL E I--AI RPOLLUTIO N PREVENTION

AN O CONTRO L

INSPECTIONS , MONITORING , AN O ENTR Y Sac . 11 4 (a ) Fo r th t purpos e (1 ) o f developing o r assistin g i nth a develop—n t o f an

y implementationpla nunda r Sectio n11 0 o r 111(d) , an y standar do f parfornanc a unda r Sactio n111 , o r an y fissio nstandar dunda r Sectio n112 . (ii ) o f determinin g whethe r an y parso ni s i nviolatio no f an y suc hstandar do r an

y requiremen t o f suc ha plan , o r (ill ) carryin g ou t an y provisio no f thi s Ac t (axcap t a provisio no f Titl a I I wit h respec t t o a manufacture r o f ne w moto r vehicle s o r ne

w moto r vehicl e anginas) — (1 ) Th t Administrato r ma y requir e an

y parso nwh o own s o r operate s an y Missio nsourc a o r wh o 1 s subjec t t o an y requiremen t o f thi s Ac t (otht r tha na manufacture r subjec t t o th t provision s o f Stctlo n206(c ) o r 208 ) wit hrtspac t t o a provisio no f Titl t I I t o (A ) establis han d maintai nsuc hrecords . (B ) aak a suc hraports . (C ) install , ust . an dmain tai nsuc hmonitorin g tguiptn t o r Methods , (0 ) sampl e suchfission s (i n accordanc e wit hsuc hmtthods . a t suc hlocations , a t suc hintervals , an d insuc hmannt r a s th t Administrato r shal l prescribe) , an d(E ) provid e suc hotht r inforation , a s h t ma y reasonabl y

require ; an

d (2 ) th t Administrato r o r hi s authorize drepresentative , upon presentatio no f hi s credentials — (A ) shal l hav e a righ t o f entr y to , upon , o r throughan y premise s o f suc hparso no r i nwhic hany record s require dt o b t maintaine dundt r paragraph(1 ) o f thi s sactio nar t located , an d (B ) M y a t reasonabl e tilt s hav t accas s t o an dcop y an y records , inspec t an

y monitorin g equipmen t andmetho drequire dundt r paragraph(1) ,

l 

### 4 2 U.S. C 185 7 a t sag . 1 9P.26

_



### an dsampl e an

y fission s whic hsuc hparso ni s require dt o sampl e unda r paragraph(1) . (b ) (1 ) Eac hStat e may

develo pan

dsubmi t t o th t Administrato r a procedur e fo r carryin g ou t thi s stctit ni nsuc hStatt . I f th t Administrato r find s th t Stat t procedur e i s adtquatt , h t na y delegat e t o suc hStat a an

y authorit y

h t ha s t o carr y

ou t thi s saction . (2 ) Nothin g i nthi s subsectio nshal l prohibi t th t Administrato r fro m carryin g ou t thi s sactio ni na Stata . (c ) Any records , rtports , o r informatio nobtaine dundt r subsectio n(a ) shal l b a avallabi a t o th t public , txctp t tha t upo na showin g satisfactor y

t o th t Administrato r by

an y parso ntha t records , reports , o r information , o r particula r par t tharaof , (otht r tha nemissio n data ) t o whic hth t Administrato r ha s accas s unda r thi s sactio ni f mad t public , woul ddivulg e mtthod s o r processe s entitle dt o prottctio na s trad t secret s o f suc hptrsons , th t Administrato r shal l consida r suc h record , report , o r informatio no r particula r portio ntharao f confidentia l i naccordanc e wit htha purpose s o f sactio n190 5 o f Titl t 1 8 o f th a Unitt dStata s Coda , axcap t tha t suc hrecord , report , o r informatio nmay b t disclose dt o otht r officers , employees , o r authorize drepresentative s o f th t Unitt dState s concerne dwit hcarryin g ou t thi s Ac t o r wha n relevan t i nan

y procttdin g undt r thi s Act . (d ) (1 ) I nth t cas t o f any fissio nstandar do r limitatio no r otha r requiremen t whic hi s adopta dby a Stata , a s par t o f a napplicabl e implementatio npla no r a s par t o f a norde r undt r Sectio n113(d) , befor e carryin g ou t a nentry , inspection , o r monitorin g undt r Paragraph(2 ) o f Subsectio n(a ) wit hrespec t t o suc hstandard , limitation , o r otha r requirement , th t Administrato r (o r hi s representatives ) shal l provid e the Stat t ai r pollutio ncontro l agenc y wit hreasonabl e prio r notic a o f suc h action, Indicatin g th t purpos e o f suc haction . N o Stat t agenc y whic h rtctiva s notic e undt r thi s paragrapho f a nactio nproposa dt o b t take n •ay us a th t informatio ncontaine dI nth t notic t t o infor m th t ptrso n whos e propert y

i s propost dt o b t affecte do f th t proposa daction . I f th t Administrato r ha s reasonabl e basi s fo r btlitvin g tha t a Stat t agenc y i s s o usin g o r wil l s o us t suc hinformation , notic a t o th a agenc y unde r thi s paragraphi s no t require dunti l suc htlm t a s th t Administrato r 2 0P.2 7

r

### dtttrmlnt s th t agenc y wil l n o longt r s o us a informatio ncontaine dina notic t undt r thi s paragraph . Nothin g i nthi s sectio nshal l b t construe d t o requir e notificatio nt o any Stat a agenc y

o f an y actio ntake nb

y th e Administrato r wit hrespec t t o any standard , limitation , o r othe r require men t whic hi s no t par t o f a napplicabl e implementatio npla no r whic hwa s promulgate db

y th e Administrato r unde r Sectio n110(c) . (2 ) Nothin g i nParagrap h(1 ) shal l b e construe dt o provid e tha t an y failur e o f th e Administrato r t o compl y wit hth t requirement s o f suc h paragraphshal l b e a defens e i nany enforcemen t actio nbrough t b y th e Administrato r o r shal l mak e inadmissibl e a s evidenc e i nany suc hactio n an y informatio no r materia l obtaine dnotwithstandin g suc hfailur e t o compl y wit hsuc hrequirement .

2 1