alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

R & D FILM 1, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

 Civil Action 2:12-cv-1116

v. Judge Michael H. Watson

 Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers

DOES 158-171,

Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

 Plaintiff filed its Complaint in this action on December 4, 2012. On July 12, 2013, the

Court ordered Plaintiff to amend its Complaint within thirty days to substitute in the real names

for its Doe Defendants and to perfect service on those named partes as required under Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or to alternatively show cause why the Court should not dismiss

this action pursuant to Rule 4(m). (ECF No. 6.) To date, Plaintiff has not moved to amend its

Complaint to substitute in the real names for its Doe Defendants. Nor has Plaintiff responded to

the Court’s Show Cause Order. It is therefore RECOMMENDED that the Court dismiss this

action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to timely effect service of process. 

PROCEDURE ON OBJECTIONS

If any party seeks review by the District Judge of this Report and Recommendation, that

party may, within fourteen (14) days, file and serve on all parties objections to the Report and

Recommendation, specifically designating this Report and Recommendation, and the part in

question, as well as the basis for objection. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

Case: 2:12-cv-01116-MHW-EPD Doc #: 7 Filed: 08/21/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Response to objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

The parties are specifically advised that the failure to object to the Report and

Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and

waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court. See, e.g., Pfahler v. Nat’l Latex

Prod. Co., 517 F.3d 816, 829 (6th Cir. 2007) (holding that “failure to object to the magistrate

judge’s recommendations constituted a waiver of [the defendant’s] ability to appeal the district

court’s ruling”); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005) (holding that

defendant waived appeal of district court’s denial of pretrial motion by failing to timely object to

magistrate judge’s report and recommendation). Even when timely objections are filed,

appellate review of issues not raised in those objections is waived. Robert v. Tesson, 507 F.3d

981, 994 (6th Cir. 2007) (“[A] general objection to a magistrate judge’s report, which fails to

specify the issues of contention, does not suffice to preserve an issue for appeal . . . .”) (citation

omitted)).

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: August 21,2013 /s/ Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers 

 Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers

 United States Magistrate Judge 

2

Case: 2:12-cv-01116-MHW-EPD Doc #: 7 Filed: 08/21/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
1 The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-1410

___________ Eddie C. Risdal, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Terry Mapes, Warden; Paul Fitzgerald, * Story County Sheriff, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: December 29, 2006 Filed: January 10, 2007

___________ Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Eddie Risdal appeals the judgment of the district court 1 dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint prior to service. Fo llowing careful review of the record and Risdal’s arguments on appeal, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Case: 2:12-cv-00576-EAS-NMK Doc #: 9 Filed: 08/02/12 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T21:48:20-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
10

10

10

10

10

10

G

U

L

F

O

F

M

E

X

I

C

O

LAGUNA

MADRE

P

A

D

R

E

I S

L

A

N

D

Potrero

Lopeno SW

South of

Potrero

Lopeno NE

Potrero

Lopeno SE

South of

Potrero

Lopeno NW

Port

Mansfield

South of

Potrero

Lopeno SE

FEET

FEET

1 360 000 FEET

30" 97°15'

26°

97°

22'

45'

30"

22'

26°

97°

17'

97° 30" 20'

26°

30"

37' 30"

26°

20' 30"

37'

45'

17' 15'

30" 42'30"

40'

42'

40'

16 790 000

1 390 000 FEET

16 760 000

E

6 6

6

29

29

000m

6

29

29

6

29

29

6

29

29

6

29

6

29

29

29

29

6

6

29

6

29

29

6

29

29

29

29

29

29

6

6

000m

6

29

29

000m

29

6 6 6 6

6

6

000m

6 6 62 E 63 64 65

57

58

69

51

64 65 73

59

55

68

53

72

49

58

66

52

67 71

47

55

50

48

49

48

59

51

54

N

54

52

62

50

53

56

47

N

56

63

66 67 68 69 71 72 73

74

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 2697-424

SOUTH OF POTRERO LOPENO NE, TX

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

SOUTH OF POTRERO LOPENO NE QUADRANGLE

TEXAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14R

Imagery......................................................NAIP, April 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2008

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2009

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 45 ́

13 MILS

4° 35 ́

81 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14R

PQ

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
{In Archive} Re: McElmo modeling 

Scott Bohning to: neil.j.ryan 03/29/2005 12:09 PM

Cc: Shaheerah Kelly, Laura Yannayon

From: Scott Bohning/R9/USEPA/US

To: neil.j.ryan@exxonmobil.com, 

Cc: Shaheerah Kelly/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Laura Yannayon/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

Archive: This message is being viewed in an archive.

Neil -

Thanks for your revised modeling of 3/28/05, which addresses the PSD increment as well as the NAAQS. 

I apologize for omitting reference to the increment in my earlier communications.

As one of the air quality modelers at EPA Region 9, I reviewed your revised modeling inputs and outputs, 

and your summary, "McElmo Main Flare Dispersion Model Input Data and Summary Results" (file "Model 

Input Data and Summary Results_3-28-05.doc"). I think you have used the SCREEN3 model 

appropriately and conservatively, and have arrived at correct conclusions about the flare's impacts. The 

results are well below the NAAQS, and are below the significant modeling concentrations ("Signficiant 

Impact Levels" or SILs). Since the impacts are insignficant, no cumulative PSD increment analysis is 

required. Your analysis is acceptable as the basis for the PSD application required under your Consent 

Decree.

Good luck on this project, and don't hesitate to contact me if you need anything else.

- Scott Bohning

=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=

Scott Bohning

U.S. EPA Region 9, AIR-7

bohning.scott@epa.gov

415/947-4127 fax-3579
127 STAT. 666 PUBLIC LAW 113–62—DEC. 20, 2013 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2922: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113–259 (Comm. on Judiciary). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 159 (2013): 

Nov. 12, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 10, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–62 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To extend the authority of the Supreme Court Police to protect court officials 

away from the Supreme Court grounds. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF SUPREME COURT POLICE 

TO PROTECT COURT OFFICIALS OFF SUPREME COURT 

GROUNDS. 

Section 6121(b)(2) of title 40, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting ‘‘2019’’. 

Approved December 20, 2013. 

Dec. 20, 2013 

[H.R. 2922] 


srobinson on DSKB307YQ1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

<~EPt\RTMENT OF ! /JJSPORTATIPN < .- </': r IQDcRAT'IO"IS <! '.t t ~ I L, ,4.. {'<II 

INTRA-ALASKA BUSH Docket OST-2003-14694 

SERVICE MAIL RATES 

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 

PETITION FOR REVIEW OF REVISED 

BUSH SERVICE MAIL RATES 

The Postal Service has reviewed Show Cause Order 2010-9-24 and hereby petitions 

for its review. The occasion for this request is the significant variance in PenAir's 

reported freight RTMs as compared to those of the previous quarter, (50,600 vice 

163,562). That difference drives a 22.32% increase in the fuel adjustment set to be 

effective October 2. When contacted, PenAir claimed unfamiliarity with the 

discrepancy, which further suggests that the figure is incorrect. All of this clearly 

warrants a brief postponement of the Order's effective date until the Department can 

resolve the matter of the data's accuracy with the carrier, since otherwise there is no 

mechanism by which an erroneous windfall can be recouped. 

These comments have been provided to the affected carriers. 

Respectfully submitted, 

William J. Jones 

Attorney 

Civil Practice 

Law Department 

United States Postal Service 

william.j.jones@usps.com 

September 29, 2010
EXHIBIT 11


                                TSI Incorporated
                        Computation of Per Share Earnings


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      Three Months Ended             Six Months Ended
                                         September 30                  September 30
                                    1999             1998         1999             1998
                                    ---------------------         ---------------------
<S>                             <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
BASIC
Weighted average common
 shares outstanding             11,293,630     11,385,895     11,238,138     11,398,859
                               -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------

Net Earnings                   $ 2,675,593    $ 2,356,057    $ 5,011,738    $ 3,478,007
                               -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------

Basic earnings per common
 share                         $       .24    $       .21    $       .45    $       .31
                               ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========

DILUTED

Weighted average common
 shares outstanding             11,293,630     11,385,894     11,238,138     11,398,859
                               -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------

Dilutive effect of employee
 stock options and purchase
 awards--based on the
 treasury stock method             337,796        167,081        281,864        175,093
                               -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------

Weighted average common
 shares outstanding and
 dilutive shares                11,631,426     11,552,975     11,520,002     11,573,952
                               -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------

Net Earnings                   $ 2,675,593    $ 2,356,057    $ 5,011,738    $ 3,478,007
                               -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------

Diluted earnings per common
 share                         $       .23    $       .20    $       .44    $       .30
                               ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========
</TABLE>

                                      -15-
# Official Journal C 482/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 482 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6430 November 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 482

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6430 November 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 482/01 | Euro exchange rates — 26 November 2021 | 1 |
| 2021/C 482/02 | New national side of euro coins intended for circulation | 2 |
| 2021/C 482/03 | New national side of euro coins intended for circulation | 3 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2021/C 482/04 | Modification of a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) | 4 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 482/01

Euro exchange rates — 26 November 2021

1

2021/C 482/02

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2

2021/C 482/03

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

3

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2021/C 482/04

Modification of a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC)

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 482/05 | Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of fatty acid originating in Indonesia | 5 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 482/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10557 – CPP INVESTSMENTS / VOTORANTIM / VOTENER) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 17 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 482/05

Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of fatty acid originating in Indonesia

5

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 482/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10557 – CPP INVESTSMENTS / VOTORANTIM / VOTENER) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

17

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>
                                                          EXHIBIT 12

              TRANSAMERICA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
          COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


                                         Three months ended March 31,
                                              1997         1996
                                         (Dollar amounts in millions)

Fixed charges:
  Interest and debt expense                   $163.6      $173.0
  One-third of rental expense                   10.9         6.3
  Minority interest                              9.9         4.3
                                              ______      ______
    Total                                     $184.4      $183.6
                                              ======      ======

Earnings:
  Net income                                  $ 81.0      $115.3
  Provision for income taxes                    36.1        58.0
  Fixed charges                                184.4       183.6
                                              ______      ______
    Total                                     $301.5      $356.9
                                              ======      ======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges              1.64        1.94
                                                ====        ====
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

GEORGE A. SIMMONS,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

vs.

 CASE NO. 2:12-cv-086

OHIO REHABILITATION JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

SERVICES COMMISSION, et al., MAGISTRATE JUDGE TERENCE P. KEMP

Defendants.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed November 27, 2013, JUDGMENT is

hereby entered DISMISSING this case.

Date: November 27, 2013 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-00086-EAS-TPK Doc #: 40 Filed: 11/27/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# Official Journal L 1/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 1 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 604 January 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 1

English edition

Legislation

Volume 604 January 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1 of 3 January 2017 on procedures for watercraft identification under Directive 2013/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on recreational craft and personal watercraft (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2 of 3 January 2017 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 6 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1 of 3 January 2017 on procedures for watercraft identification under Directive 2013/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on recreational craft and personal watercraft (
  1
  )

1

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2 of 3 January 2017 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

6

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit10.4


 


Form of Amendment No. 6 to Wale Oshodi’s
Employment Agreement


 


This Amendment No. 4 (the “Amendment”),
dated as of April 7, 2022 (the “Effective Date”), is between International Seaways, Inc. (the “Company”)
and Adewale O. Oshodi (the “Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, Overseas Shipholding
Group, Inc. (“OSG”) and the Executive previously entered into an employment agreement, dated September 29, 2014 and
as amended as of March 2, 2015, which was assumed by the Company and subsequently further amended as of November 7, 2017, April 5, 2019,
April 2, 2020 and March 16, 2021 (the “Employment Agreement”).


 


WHEREAS, the Employment
Agreement was assigned to the Company on November 30, 2016 in connection with the spin-off of the Company from OSG (the “Assignment”).


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to
Section 13(g) of the Employment Agreement, following the Assignment, references to “the Company” in the Employment Agreement
constitute a reference to the Company (rather than to OSG).


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and the Executive wish to amend the Employment Agreement in accordance with Section 13(c) thereof.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the premises and mutual covenants herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:


 


		1.	Section 3(a) is hereby amended by replacing “$276,848” with “$285,708”.



 


		2.	Except as provided herein, the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall be
binding on the Company in the same manner and to the same extent as on OSG if no assignment to the Company had taken place.



 


		3.	This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original, but
all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.



 


[Signature Page Follows]


 









     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
have executed this Amendment to the Employment Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


	 	Adewale O. Oshodi
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	International Seaways, Inc.
	 	 
	 	 
	 	Name:
	 	 
	 	 
	 	Title:
# C_2008322EN.01S00301.xml

| 17.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 322/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 322/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v HENRY L. GASTON, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant

16 USCMA 626, 37 CMR 246

No. 19,949

April 21, 1967

*Colonel Daniel T. Ghent, Lieutenant Colonel Martin S. Drucker,*and *Major David J. Passamaneclc*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel David Rarick*and *Captain Salvatore A. Romano*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

A general court-martial in Vietnam convicted the accused of misbehavior before the enemy. The findings of guilty were disapproved by the board of review, which affirmed a finding of guilty of unauthorized absence. The accused appealed to this Court for further review, contending he was prejudiced by an instruction on the credibility of witnesses. We condemned a like instruction in United States v Robbins, 16 USCMA 474, 37 CMR 94.

The decision of the board of review is reversed and the finding of guilty and the sentence are set aside. A rehearing may be ordered.
# •

August 17, 2011 U.S. Department ofTransportation, Docket Management System, 400

## ih Street, SW., Room PL 401, Washington, DC 20591-0001 cc: Federal Aviation Administration New England Region 12 New England Executive Park Burlington, MA 01803 1of1

GEnx/PAH/056/11

Subject: Petition for Exemption to FAR 33.83(d) GEAviation General Electric Company, BBC15 P. 0. Box 156301, One NeumannWay Cincinnati, OH 45215-6301 513 243-9478 513 243-9478 FAX Email Paui.Hill1@ge.com bee: File/LB

Reference: Letter, GEnx/PAH/034/11, dated 25 July2011, "Petition for Exemption to FAR 33.83(d) for GEnx-2B (all models) Aircraft Engines" Gentlemen: This letter cancels and supersedes letter GEnx/PAH/034/11, dated, 25 July 2011. The General Electric Company (GE Aviation Division) herebywithdraws the Petition for Exemption to 14 CFR Part 33 Section 33.83(d) forthe GEnx-2B (all models) as requested in the reference (1) letter. Sincerely, 

### () /} l**?a~** 

### /-f. ' Paul 

### A Hill FAA-DER 

# 'Lf 'y/}**l'~** Principal Engineer, Airworthiness&Certification

cc: Mr. Robert Green, FAA (ANE-141)