alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
510000m.6.

BATHYMETRIC MAP

ARCTIC OCEAN
POSEY

7930000m..y,

7980000.

7880000m..y,

78g0000m.1),

m2
a
a

Base map information including bathymetry was compiled by the National
Ocean Service (NOS). Bathymetry was compiled from NOS hydrographic
surveys supplemented by hydrographic information from other sources
(see index). NOS hydrographic survey data compiles with International
Hydrographic Organization (IHO) Special Publication 44 accuracy
standards or those used at the date of the survey. This is a reproduction
of a facsimile of the bathymetric manuscript and does not necessarily
represent the final publication. This information is not intended for navi-
gational purposes.
Bathymetric Contour Interval: 10 meters to maximum depth, supplemented
by 2 meter intervals.
Datum: Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW).
Universal Transverse Mercator Grid. Zone 3; 10,000 meter ticks (--) are
shown inside the neatline.
Protraction Diagram data shown in a subdued (screened) black was com-
piled by the Minerals Management Service (MMS).
THIS MAP IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal leasing purposes; for
such purposes use the MMS Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction
Diagrams.

Heavy lines(s} indicate limits of these protraction diagrams.

HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMATION

suavey
survey suRvEY survey LINE SPACING
NUMBER DATE SCALE (NAUT. MILES)

H-8656 1962 41:100,000 20-1.2

OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MAP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE

1986

Produced at Washington, D.C.
for

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
, MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE

TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION
Scale 1:250,000
10

° 15 20 Statute Miles
5 ° 5 10 15 20 25 30 Kilometers
———— oI i

°

5 10

15 Nautical Miles
—

NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE

165° HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY INDEX 162°
72° 72°
‘Supplementary
Data
H-8656,
ne v1
165° Photographic copies of the above and prior surveys 162°

may be obtained, at the cost of reproduction, by
addressing the ‘Director (N/CG243), National
Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

POSEY
NOS NR 3-2 (OCS)

INDEX TO
1ege ADJOINING SHEETS | i¢90
73° 73°

ARCTIC OCEAN

couse; souivik
NR SS | ISLAND
NR 34

70°
168° 159°
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 73 (Tuesday, April 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19227-19228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7246]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending April 6, 
2007

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1383 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: OST-2007-27825.
    Date Filed: April 5, 2007.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Mail Vote 532--Resolution 010n, TC3 Special Passenger 
Amending Resolution Between Japan and China (excluding Hong SAR and 
Macao SAR) (Memo 1076).

[[Page 19228]]

    Intended effective date: 15 April 2007.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisory Docket Officer, Docket Operations, Alternate Federal 
Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. E7-7246 Filed 4-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
# C_2008326EN.01000602.xml

| 20.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5093 — DP World/Conti 7/Rickmers/DP World Breakbulk/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 326/08)

On 18 November 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5093. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5093. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Smithland locks and dam

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Smithland locks and dam 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Army. Corps of EngineersFitzgerald, Janet 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Smithland locks and dam by Janet Fitzgerald 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1970-1980 
                    -           Country        
                    -  United States 
                    -           State        
                    -  IllinoisKentucky 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  141 × 51 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  D103.49-3.R52-07.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

HENRY N. HARPER,

Plaintiff,

vs. Civil Action 2:11-CV-555

Judge Frost

Magistrate Judge King

WILLIAM NICHOLSON,

Defendant.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, brings this action alleging that

defendant, the attorney who represented plaintiff in his state court

criminal proceedings, committed legal malpractice during the course of

those proceedings. The Complaint invokes the Court’s diversity

jurisdiction and federal question jurisdiction and seeks an award of

monetary damages. This matter is now before the Court for the initial

screen of the Complaint required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e), 1915A. Because

the Court concludes that jurisdiction is lacking, it is recommended that

the action be dismissed.

Plaintiff and defendant are both identified as residents of

Ohio. The Court therefore lacks diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1332. The Court also lacks federal question jurisdiction because the

Complaint fails to allege the denial of a constitutional right by a state

agent or employee. See Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 318-19 (1981)

(a defense lawyer – even an attorney appointed by a state court - does

not act under color of state law in defending a client). Under these

circumstances, the Complaint must be dismissed for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction.

It is therefore RECOMMENDED that the action be dismissed under

28 U.S.C. §§1915(e), 1915A, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. It

Case: 2:11-cv-00555-MHW-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 06/27/11 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Court conclude that an appeal from the

judgment entered in the action would not be taken in good faith. See 28

U.S.C. §1915(a).

If any party seeks review by the District Judge of this Report

and Recommendation, that party may, within fourteen (14) days, file and

serve on all parties objections to the Report and Recommendation,

specifically designating this Report and Recommendation, and the part

thereof in question, as well as the basis for objection thereto. 28

U.S.C. §636(b)(1); F.R. Civ. P. 72(b). Response to objections must be

filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof. 

F.R. Civ. P. 72(b). 

The parties are specifically advised that failure to object to

the Report and Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to de

novo review by the District Judge and of the right to appeal the decision

of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers,

Local 231 etc., 829 F.2d 1370 (6th Cir. 1987); United States v. Walters, 

638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

 s/Norah McCann King Norah McCann King

 United States Magistrate Judge

June 27, 2011

(Date)

2

Case: 2:11-cv-00555-MHW-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 06/27/11 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2004106EN.01000702.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/7

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 1 April 2004

in Case C-90/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof): Finanzamt Gummersbach v Gerhard Bockemühl
   (1)

Finanzamt Gummersbach

Gerhard Bockemühl

1

(‘Reference for a preliminary ruling - Interpretation of Article 18(1) of the Sixth VAT Directive - Conditions for exercise of the right to deduct input VAT - Recipient of a service referred to in Article 9(2)(e) of the Sixth VAT Directive - Supply of staff by a taxable person established abroad - Recipient liable for VAT as the person to whom the supply was made - Requirement to hold an invoice - Content of the invoice’)

(2004/C 106/10)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-90/02: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Bundesfinanzhof (Federal Finance Court) (Germany) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Finanzamt Gummersbach and Gerhard Bockemühl – on the interpretation of Articles 18(1) and 22(3) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1), as amended by Council Directive 91/680/EEC of 16 December 1991 supplementing the common system of value added tax and amending Directive 77/388 with a view to the abolition of fiscal frontiers (OJ 1991 L 376, p. 1) and by Council Directive 92/111/EEC of 14 December 1992 amending Directive 77/388 and introducing simplification measures with regard to value added tax (OJ 1992 L 384, p. 47) – the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: P. Jann, acting for the President of the Fifth Chamber, A. Rosas and S. von Bahr (Rapporteur), Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 1 April 2004, in which it ruled:

Finanzamt Gummersbach

Gerhard Bockemühl –

A taxable person who is liable, as the recipient of services, for the value added tax relating thereto, in accordance with Article 21(1) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 91/680/EEC of 16 December 1991 supplementing the common system of value added tax and amending Directive 77/388 with a view to the abolition of fiscal frontiers and by Council Directive 92/111/EEC of 14 December 1992 amending Directive 77/388 and introducing simplificationmeasures with regard to value added tax, is not obliged to be in possession of an invoice drawn up in accordance with Article 22(3) of that directive in order to be able to exercise his right to deduct.

---

(1)  OJ C 169 of 13.7.2002.

1

---
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00461

- CV
Douglas Gengenbach, Viola Bazan, Individually and/or d/b/a Exotic Berry, LLC and/or Exotic Berry, LLC v. Ivonne Ochoa Angulo and Salvador Palacios, Individually and/or d/b/a Exotic Berry Frozen Yogurt

O n a ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 8 of Hidalgo County , Texas

Trial Cause No. CL

- 18

- 3329

- H

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DIS MISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. September 20, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1,000,000
       
<S>                                                          <C>    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                        51
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               0
<PP&E>                                                     3,093
<DEPRECIATION>                                             1,359
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            11,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          0
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                      15
<OTHER-SE>                                                 1,625
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              11,144
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             414
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 72
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              21
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               42
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  18
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           24
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  24
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0
        

</TABLE>
```

[113th Congress Public Law 63]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 127 STAT. 667]]

Public Law 113-63
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To treat payments by charitable organizations with respect to certain 
firefighters as exempt payments. <<NOTE: Dec. 20, 2013 -  [H.R. 3458]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Fallen 
Firefighters Assistance Tax Clarification Act of 2013. New York.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fallen Firefighters Assistance Tax 
Clarification Act of 2013''.
SEC. 2. PAYMENTS BY CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS WITH RESPECT TO 
                    CERTAIN FIREFIGHTERS TREATED AS EXEMPT 
                    PAYMENTS.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, 
payments made to--
            (1) any firefighter who was injured as a result of the 
        ambush of firefighters responding to an emergency on December 
        24, 2012, in Webster, New York,
            (2) the spouse of any firefighter who died as a result of 
        such ambush, or
            (3) any dependent (as defined in section 152 of such Code) 
        of any firefighter who died as a result of such ambush,

by an organization described in paragraph (1) or (2) of section 509(a) 
of such Code shall be treated as related to the purpose or function 
constituting the basis for such organization's exemption under section 
501 of such Code if such payments are made in good faith using a 
reasonable and objective formula which is consistently applied.
    (b) Application.--Subsection (a) shall apply only to payments made 
on or after December 24, 2012, and before the later of--
            (1) January 1, 2014, or
            (2) the date which is 30 days after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.

    Approved December 20, 2013.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3458:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 159 (2013):
            Dec. 12, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 13, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Before the Third Division,

April 19, 1944

No. 49356.

#### Protests 983157-G, etc., of Crosse & Blackwell Co. et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities-eited'in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

MICHAEL HEAD 

 CASE NO. 2:12-CV-1161 

 Petitioner, JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers 

 v. 

MICK OPPY, WARDEN, 

 Respondent. 

OPINION AND ORDER 

On February 3, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation

recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

be dismissed. Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge’s 

recommendations, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. 

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action hereby is 

DISMISSED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Algenon L. Marbley 

 ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 United States District Judge 

Case: 2:12-cv-01161-ALM-EPD Doc #: 15 Filed: 03/05/14 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2007315EN.01003802.xml

| 22.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/38

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 November 2007 — Charlott v OHIM — Charlo (Charlott France Entre Luxe et Tradition)

(Case T-169/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for figurative Community trade mark Charlott France Entre Luxe et Tradition - Earlier figurative national mark Charlot - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2007/C 315/72)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Charlott SARL (Chaponost, France) (represented by: L. Conrad, T. Parisot and L. Tremeaud, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Charlo — Confecções para Homens, Artigos de Lã e Outros SA.

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 April 2006 (Case R 223/205-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Charlo — Confecções para Homens, Artigos de Lã e Outros SA and Charlott SARL.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Charlott SARL to pay the costs, except those incurred by the intervener; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Charlott SARL to pay the costs, except those incurred by the intervener;

| 3. | Orders Charlo — Confecções para Homens, Artigos de Lã e Outros SA to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Charlo — Confecções para Homens, Artigos de Lã e Outros SA to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 212, 2.9.2006.

1

---