alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11
                                TSI Incorporated
                       Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                       Three Months Ended             Nine Months Ended
                                          December 31                    December 31
                                          -----------                    -----------

                                      1997           1996            1997           1996
                                   -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------
<S>                                 <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>       
PRIMARY
Average shares outstanding          11,659,613     11,276,305     11,587,909     11,245,038

Net effect of dilutive stock
options, based on the treasury
stock method using average
market price                           266,196        437,497        280,597        445,753
                                   -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------

Total                               11,925,809     11,713,802     11,868,506     11,690,791
                                   ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========

Net earnings                       $ 1,678,015    $ 2,193,098    $ 4,930,886    $ 5,675,344
                                   ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========

Primary per share amounts          $       .14    $       .19    $       .42    $       .49
                                   ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========


FULLY DILUTED
Average shares                      11,659,613     11,276,305     11,587,909     11,245,038

Net effect of dilutive stock
options, based on the treasury
stock method using the
period-end market price, if
higher than the average market
price                                  267,595        491,403        293,858        516,387
                                   -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------

Total                               11,927,208     11,767,708     11,881,767     11,761,425
                                   ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========

Net earnings                       $ 1,678,015    $ 2,193,098    $ 4,930,886    $ 5,675,344
                                   ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========

Fully diluted per share amounts    $       .14    $       .19    $       .41    $       .49
                                   ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========

</TABLE>
| (logo) plante moran | **Plante & Moran, PLLC**

10 South Riverside Plaza

9th floor

Chicago, IL 60606

Tel: 312.207.1040

Fax: 312.207.1066

plantemoran.com |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

To the Board of Directors

National Tax Search, LLC

 

We have examined National TaxSearch, LLC’s (the “Company”) compliance with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forthe National Tax Search TaxQ system (the “Platform”) as of and forthe year ended December 31, 2016. The Company has determined that only certain servicingcriteria, 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v),1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are applicable to theactivities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activitiesperformed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.

 

Management is responsible forthe Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility isto express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliancewith the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination wasconducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included a selection of a sample of transactionsand compliance activities related to the Platform during the examination periodand determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performedthose activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our testing ofselected transactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations,reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered bythis report. Our procedures did not include determining whether errors may haveoccurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amountscalculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this reportfor the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination doesnot provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with theservicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedservicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for thePlatform is fairly stated in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC

 

Chicago, IL

January 27, 2017

 

 

(logo) Praxity 

MEMBER

GLOBAL ALLIANCE OF 

INDEPENDENT FIRMS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 13, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132093 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 132093 

 COA: 268119 
 Wayne CC: 03-011896-01

MURAD WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 2, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

KELLY, J., would remand this case for resentencing. 

d1206 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 13, 2006 

 Clerk
Document

Exhibit 10.13


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THOMAS K. MCCARTHY


THIS AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated August 16, 2021, as amended on December 30, 2021 (the “Agreement”) is entered into by and between Altisource Asset Management Corporation (“AAMC”, the “Company,” or the “Employer”), and Thomas K. McCarthy (the “Executive”) as of March 30, 2022.
WHEREAS, the Employer desires to continue to employ the Executive as the Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company; 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth in the Agreement, Employer and the Executive hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 
1.Employment Term.
(a)Term. The term of this Agreement began on the first day of the Executive’s employment with the Employer, April 18, 2021 (the “Effective Date”), and will continue until the earliest to occur of: (i) the date on which a permanent Chief Executive Officer commences employment with the Company, (ii) May 31, 2022, and (iii) a Termination of Employment (as defined below) (the “Term”). The period commencing on the Effective Date and ending on the date on which the Executive’s employment terminates (the “Termination Date”) is referred to herein as the “Term.” 
2.Entire Agreement. Other than the change set forth in Section 1, this Amendment shall not alter any other terms of the Agreement.
(Signature Page Follows)










IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.
ALTISOURCE ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION




By: /s/ Kevin F. Sullivan______________    
Name: Kevin F. Sullivan
Date:   March 30, 2022


EXECUTIVE


    
By: /s/ Thomas K. McCarthy__________
Name: Thomas K. McCarthy
Date:   March 30, 2022    




    2
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofFebruary 1, 2016, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC, asDepositor, KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, asOperating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, and WILMINGTON TRUST,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-GC36 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Dan Marthinsen, Managing Director ofSpecial Servicing do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of theSpecial Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31,2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement duringsuch period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based onsuch review, the Special Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations underthe Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Marthinsen

DanielMarthinsen, Managing Director

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Tank Car Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth P. Fischl, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



In witness whereof, I have executed this certification as of the
13thday of May, 2005.



/s/ Kenneth P. FischlKenneth P. FischlPrincipal Executive Officer
Case: 2:12-cv-01190-EAS-EPD Doc #: 59 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T09:22:31-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Te xas

June 28, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00058

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF KENNETH CURTIS ANDREWS, DECEASED

,

From the 81st Judicial District Court

, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18

- 04

- 0239

- CVW

Honorable Sid L. Harle , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Appellant’s motion for rehearing and/or motion for e n ba n c reconsideration was due on

June 24, 2021. On June 24, 2021, appellant filed a motion requesting a twenty

- one day

extension of time. The motion is GRANTED and appellant’s motion for rehearing and/or

motion for e n banc reconsideration is due no later than July 15, 202 1

.

It is so ORDE RED Ju ne 28, 202 1

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

______ ____________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, CLERK OF COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>





<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
FOR THE THREE  MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           57666
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   577982
<ALLOWANCES>                                     17917
<INVENTORY>                                     506611
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1165514
<PP&E>                                         6966599
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3222810
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5131758
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           846166
<BONDS>                                        1250052
<COMMON>                                         69254
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1995643
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5131758
<SALES>                                        1057125
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1057125
<CGS>                                           812133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1012298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (2,935)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               31062
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  18853
<INCOME-TAX>                                      6712
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               9618
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      9618
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
<FN>
<F1> REFLECTS ADJUSTMENT FOR MINORITY INTEREST (NET OF TAX) OF $2523
</FN>
        






</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 76 (Friday, April 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7572]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-397-000]

Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

April 13, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 10, 2007, Colorado Interstate Gas Company 
(CIG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 272A, to become effective May 11, 
2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
[email protected], or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-7572 Filed 4-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
No. 62047.

#### R. H. Newmark, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 314067-K (New York).

Opinion by

Laweence, J.

The protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Mr. Allen 8. Conner, February 11, 1939, Page Q.

history 0r the time, the oontamporsneoue olroumetmo4s, and the conditions leading to the enactment of ths amendment, to ascertain th+ ?urposr snd msenl~ or the amendment, and the language v&l]. be construed to further that purpoae. Ewme t. kal,ra, 170 Ter. 3S3, 40 6. I’,. (2nd) 31; San Anton10 Independent Sohool Dlstrlot v. State, (Clv. App.) 173 s. ::i. 5%;

..‘illtome v, Carroll, It:: S. ‘7. 29. The thing to be sou(.!lt 1s the thought af~reaced, (Cardova v. stnte, 0 cr. l-t. 207) alth the view of ascertaining and giving effect to the intent of the people whoadopted the amendment. Collingsworth County v. Allred, 120 Tcx. 473, 40 z. :;‘
. (2nd) 13.

It 1s nmatter of oonmonknowleci;:e that tkJ-;c?anendmot was EOUf:ht in this instanoe solely to ellminnte the obsolete dueling olause. There wes no eu[;Ceetion of any other purpose to be arrected. In tsct, the very lanfusce of the amendr.lentindicates that the people intended that

“all officeran chould take the oath of offloe. “All Offlcers*ms both elective and appointive oi~flcere. Yet we should not impute to the -people of Texas an intention that appointive orflcers ahoul~dtake er: oath embodyIng lani:uege wholly inapplicable to the zanner by which they acquired their office.

Applylnc the rules of oonstltutional cooctruotion above stated, the conolusion Is olear. i:e therefore hold that, ln order to Give effect to the lntentlon Or the people in voting this amendment, all appointloo officers in thla State, Including ootarlre public, muet take the constitutional oath of offlco provided by the amendment, but that the oath as to themmust conclude, after eliminatlng the viorde, e.. . for the giving or withholding a vote at the election at whloh 1was cleated," after the word

“reward ,* with theaa words, e... to seoure myappointment. So help meGod.” Yours very truly ATTORNEY

G W&RALOFTEXAC By &&&.&&tAl

EC.‘A..Falrohlld F&w :F BP

_Assistant APPRCVXD:
r A ., (\.‘

. AWORtiEX G?E?%XAL OF TEXAS

6
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                             TRANS-INDUSTRIES, INC.


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trans-Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dale S.
Coenen, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kai Kosanke, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:


(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




/s/ Dale S. Coenen
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name: Dale S. Coenen
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 9, 2003


/s/ Kai Kosanke
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name: Kai Kosanke
Title: Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 9, 2003




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Paragraph 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

See also the certification pursuant to Sec. 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, which is also attached to this Report.
# Official Journal L 80I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 080I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6222 March 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 080I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6222 March 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | European Council Decision (EU) 2019/476 taken in agreement with the United Kingdom of 22 March 2019 extending the period under Article 50(3)TEU | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

European Council Decision (EU) 2019/476 taken in agreement with the United Kingdom of 22 March 2019 extending the period under Article 50(3)TEU

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.