alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ipii_ex469.htm

EXHIBIT 4.69
  
 Extension of Debenture Maturity Date
  
 TO Intellipharmaceutics International Inc. (the "Company")
  
 RE: Debenture dated May 1, 2019, for a face amount of US $1,050,000 issued by the Company to Isa Odidi and Amina Odidi (the "Debenture") and the Maturity Date (as defined in the Debenture and as extended from time to time) of such Debenture
  
 The undersigned hereby agree that the current Maturity Date of the Debenture (currently December 31, 2020) is extended to May 31, 2021.
   
 DATED as of December 31, 2020.
   
 	/s/ Isa Odidi 	 	 	/s/ Amina Odidi	 
	Isa Odidi  	 	 	Amina Odidi
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

 

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2015, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, C-III ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-P2 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from December 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”) , and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

  

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
```

[113th Congress Public Law 69]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 127 STAT. 1207]]

Public Law 113-69
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to modify the Pilot Project 
 offices of the Federal Permit Streamlining Pilot Project. <<NOTE: Dec. 
                        26, 2013 -  [H.R. 767]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PILOT PROJECT OFFICES OF FEDERAL PERMIT STREAMLINING 
                              PILOT PROJECT.

    Section 365 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15924) is 
amended by striking subsection (d) and inserting the following:
    ``(d) <<NOTE: State listing.>> Pilot Project Offices.--The following 
Bureau of Land Management Offices shall serve as the Pilot Project 
offices:
            ``(1) Rawlins Field Office, Wyoming.
            ``(2) High Plains District Office, Wyoming.
            ``(3) Montana/Dakotas State Office, Montana.
            ``(4) Farmington Field Office, New Mexico.
            ``(5) Carlsbad Field Office, New Mexico.
            ``(6) Grand Junction/Glenwood Springs Field Office, 
        Colorado.
            ``(7) Vernal Field Office, Utah.''.

    Approved December 26, 2013.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 767:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113-55 (Comm. on Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 159 (2013):
            May 15, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 19, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
# Official Journal L 22/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 22 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5928 January 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 22

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5928 January 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2016/72 of 22 January 2016 fixing for 2016 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters, and amending Regulation (EU) 2015/104 | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2016/72 of 22 January 2016 fixing for 2016 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters, and amending Regulation (EU) 2015/104

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
FORM OF
OUTSIDE DIRECTOR STOCK AWARD
 TOREADOR RESOURCES CORPORATION
2005 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
 Plan Company
 Participant
  Terms of Award Agreement ______ Awarded Shares
 Subject to Plan
 Vesting
 Voting provided however Section 4
 Representations, Etc.
 Simultaneous Death
 Dispute Resolution
 Arbitration




---



##### 



AAA Section 8
   Section 7(b) Section 7
  Emergency Relief Section 7 Section 7
 Participants Representations




---



##### 



Participants Acknowledgments
 Law Governing
 Legal Construction.
 Covenants and Agreements as Independent Agreements
 Entire Agreement
 Parties Bound
 Modification




---



##### 



Headings
 Gender and Number
 Notice
 (a)
    
    Notice to the Company shall be addressed and delivered as follows:Toreador Resources Corporation
13760 Noel Road, Suite 1100
Dallas, Texas 75240
Attn: Chief Executive Officer
Facsimile:  (214) 559-3945(b)
    
    Notice to the Participant shall be addressed and delivered as set forth on the
signature page.
 Tax Requirements Section 19 Company
 Signature Page to Follow




---



##### 



Section 1
 COMPANY:TOREADOR RESOURCES CORPORATIONBy:Name:Title:PARTICIPANT:SignatureName:Address:
#### Borough of Minersville, Appellant, *v.*Cullen.

March 16, 1925:

*Equity*— *Injunction*—■ *Preliminary injunction*— *Refusal*— Ap*peals.*

On an appeal from a refusal of a preliminary injunction to restrain the defendants from continuing an alleged trespass, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed, where there is no evidence of abuse of discretion on the part of the chancellor.

In such case, where the subject complained of is of a public nature, the Superior Court will immediately dispose of the case, without a discussion of the facts.

Argued March 12,1925.

Appeal, No. 73, Oct. T., 1925, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Schuylkill Co., Jan. T., 1925, No. 5, in Equity, in the case of The Corporation of the Borough of Minersville v. James H. Cullen, trading as the Cullen Fuel Company, Allen F. Keller, Supt., William Koons, Gen. Mgr., and Joseph McDonald, Foreman..

Before Porter, Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ.

Dismissed.

Bill in equity for injunction. Before Koch, J.

The court dismissed the bill. Plaintiff appealed.

*Error assigned*was the decree of the court.

*Roger Prosser,*Borough Solicitor, and with him *Edmund D. Smith,*for appellant.

*Jno. F. Whalen*and *George Ellis,*for appellees.

Per Curiam,

This, is an appeal from the refusal of a preliminary injunction. The bill prayed to restrain defendants from continuing an alleged trespass. We shall not refer to the merits at this time, but in view of the public nature of the subject complained of in the bill, we shall immediately dispose of the case.

As no abuse of discretion appears the appeal is dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

-- -- -- --

NO. 15-0477

ERIC DRAKE

v.

TRAVELERS INDEMNITY

COMPANY, CONSUMERS

COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE,

QUILLING, SELANDER, LOWNDS,

WINSLETT & MOSER, P.C.,

MARCIE SCHOUT, MATTHEW

KITA, WILLIAM LANCE LEWIS

AND TERESA GRAY

§

§

§

§

§

§

Dallas County,

5th District.

November 13, 2015

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 29th day of December, 2015.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
No. 53171.

#### Tuck Shing Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 825145-G, etc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Gerry Ruff-El,

Plaintiff

 v.

Capital Recovery Systems, Inc.,

Defendant

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action 2:12-cv-00383

Judge Smith

Magistrate Judge Abel

Order

Defendant Capital Recovery Systems, Inc.’s February 28, 2013 motion to extend

the discovery and dispositive motion deadlines (doc. 20) is GRANTED. Discovery must

be completed by March 30, 2013 and dispositive motions must be filed on or before

April 30, 2013.

Defendant’s January 14, 2013 unopposed motion to compel plaintiff to respond

to defendant’s discovery requests (doc. 18) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ORDERED to

provide complete responses to defendant’s first set of interrogatories and requests for

production of documents within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Failure to

comply with this Order may result in sanctions, which include:

(i) directing that the matters embraced in the order or other designated

facts be taken as established for purposes of the action, as the prevailing

party claims;

1

Case: 2:12-cv-00383-GCS-MRA Doc #: 21 Filed: 03/01/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
(ii) prohibiting the disobedient party from supporting or opposing

designated claims or defenses, or from introducing designated matters in

evidence;

(iii) striking pleadings in whole or in part;

(iv) staying further proceedings until the order is obeyed;

(v) dismissing the action or proceeding in whole or in part;

(vi) rendering a default judgment against the disobedient party; or

(vii) treating as contempt of court the failure to obey any order except an

order to submit to a physical or mental examination.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b).

Under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A), Rule 72(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., and

Eastern Division Order No. 91-3, pt. F, 5, either party may, within fourteen (14) days

after this Order is filed, file and serve on the opposing party a motion for

reconsideration by the District Judge. The motion must specifically designate the

Order, or part thereof, in question and the basis for any objection thereto. The District

Judge, upon consideration of the motion, shall set aside any part of this Order found to

be clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

s/Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge

2

Case: 2:12-cv-00383-GCS-MRA Doc #: 21 Filed: 03/01/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
**
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGEACT OF 1934,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

I, Timothy M. Cunningham, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Organogenesis Holdings Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [omitted]; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: April 30, 2019 

 
/s/ Timothy M. CunninghamTimothy M. Cunningham*Chief Financial Officer**(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)***
EX-32(b)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Union Planters Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Bobby L. Doxey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

SHANE BAKER,

Plaintiff,

 

V. Case No. 2:13-cv-0034

Judge Smith

Magistrate Judge King

JOEL E. KAYE, M.D., et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

On January 16, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge 

recommended that defendants’ motion for summary judgment, ECF 41, be 

granted. Report and Recommendation, ECF 48. Although the parties were 

advised of their right to object to that recommendation and of the 

consequences of their failure to do so, there has been no objection.

The Report and Recommendation, ECF 48, is ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED. 

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, ECF 41, is GRANTED.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter FINAL JUDGMENT in this case.

 s/George C. Smith______ 

 George C. Smith, Judge

 United States District Court

Case: 2:13-cv-00034-GCS-NMK Doc #: 49 Filed: 02/24/15 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Sherman Hill Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2015
of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James Cassidy
                                 Chief Executive OFficer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: June 30, 2016
#### Tobias & Co. *v.*United States

No. 6711.

Entry No. 733702.

Invoice dated Birmingham, England, November 11, 1941.

Entered at New York, N. Y., January 9, 1942.

(Decided January 7, 1947)

*Lane & Wallace*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Reeee, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402. (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2094/2004

of 8 December 2004         

opening and providing for the administration of a tariff quota of 10 000 tonnes of oat grains otherwise worked falling within CN code 1104 22 98         

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The tariff quota in the Annex is hereby opened for each marketing year running from 1 July to 30 June.

Article 2

The tariff quota referred to in Article 1 shall be managed by the Commission in accordance with the Articles 308a, 308b and 308c of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93.

Article 3

Imports of oat grains under the tariff quota referred to in Article 1 shall not require the submission of an import licence.

Article 4

Regulation (EC) No 2369/96 is hereby repealed.

Article 5

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 December 2004.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 323, 13.12.1996, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

(3)OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2286/2003 (OJ L 343, 31.12.2003, p. 1).

----

ANNEX

Tariff quota with a quota period running from 1 July to 30 June

----

(1)  Without prejudice to the rules for interpreting the Combined Nomenclature, the wording for the description of the products is to be considered as having no more than an indicative value, the preferential treatment being determined, in the context of this Annex, by the coverage of the CN codes as they exist at the time of adoption of this Regulation.

----
Searched for **http://www.eac.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.eac.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Renae Castillo and Rhonda Sanchez,

Plaintiffs

 v.

Morales, Inc., et al.,

Defendants

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action 2:12-cv-00650

Judge Marbley

Magistrate Judge Abel

ORDER

The State of Ohio’s October 10, 2012 motion to intervene (doc. 7) is GRANTED. I

reserve ruling on any of the other substantive issues raised by the State of Ohio’s

motion concerning whether this Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over

count ten of the complaint.

Under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A), Rule 72(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., and

Eastern Division Order No. 91-3, pt. F, 5, either party may, within fourteen (14) days

after this Order is filed, file and serve on the opposing party a motion for

reconsideration by the District Judge. The motion must specifically designate the

Order, or part thereof, in question and the basis for any objection thereto. The District

Judge, upon consideration of the motion, shall set aside any part of this Order found to

be clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

s/ Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case: 2:12-cv-00650-ALM-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 12/19/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 53687.

protests 129803-K, etc. (New York).

#### C. H. Pearson & Son Hardwood Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sawed dagame lumber similar in all material respects to that the subject of *John A. Hunter Hardwood Corp.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 139, C. D. 1143), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.