alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### David Brown *versus*Moses Witham *& als.*

To render the doings of a town meeting legal, it should appear that attested copies of the 'warrant for the meeting wore posted in public and conspicuous places, and that the places of posting were *within*the town.

This was an action of trespass *quare clausum,*submitted on report. It was admitted that the defendants entered upon and crossed the land described in plaintiff’s writ, claiming that a private way had been laid out by the town.

*Vinton,*for the plaintiff.

*Howard & Strout,*for the defendants.

The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court, which was drawn up by

Rice, J.

The question whether the defendants are liable, *30in this action, depends upon the legality of the proceedings to lay out a private way over the land of the plaintiff on the petition of the defendants. There are several objections to those proceedings relied upon. The first is, that the meeting of the town at which the way was accepted was not legally warned.

Sect. 7, of c. 3, R. S., provides that such meeting shall be notified by the person to whom the warrant is directed, by his posting up an attested copy thereof in some public and conspicuous place in said town, seven days before the meeting; unless the town has appointed by vote, in legal meeting, a different mode, which any town may do. In either case, the person who notifies the meeting shall make his return on the warrant, stating the manner of notice, and the time it was given.

The return on the warrant is as follows:—

"New Gloucester, June 22, 1858.

"Pursuant to the within warrant, to me directed, I have notified the inhabitants of said town of New Gloucester, qualified as therein expressed, to assemble at the time and place, and for the purposes therein mentioned, by posting up an attested copy of such warrant at the Congregationalist, Baptist, and Universalist meeting houses; and at Sabbath day pond, and at the school house ’over the hill, on the 22d day of June, being seven days before said meeting.

"E. S. White, Constable of New Gloucester.”

It does not appear from the return, or in any other manner, that attested copies of the warrant were posted in *public*or *conspicuous*places, or that the meeting houses named in the return, or the pond, or the " school house over the hill,” or either of them, were within the town of New Gloucester, nor has the Court judicial knowledge that such is the fact. The notice, therefore, was clearly insufficient and the proceedings of the meeting void. *State*v. *Williams,*25 Maine, 261; *Bearce*v. *Fossett,*34 Maine, 575.

The defendants, therefore, fail in their justification on this point, and, according to the provision of the report, must be *31defaulted for nominal damages. It is not necessary to consider the other objections. *Defendants defaulted,*

Tenney, C. J., Appleton, Goodenow, Davis and Walton, JJ., concurred.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000022

13-JUL-2018

10:18 AM
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19504-19505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7354]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Reissuance

    Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime 
Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 
U.S.C. Chapter 409), and the regulations of the Commission pertaining 
to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 
515.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
       License No.             Name/address           Date reissued
------------------------------------------------------------------------
017126N..................  Daily Freight Cargo,  January 19, 2007.
                            Corp., 8538 NW 70th
                            Street, Miami, FL
                            33166.
017121F..................  Freight Logistics     March 24, 2007.
                            Services, LLC,
                            21905 64th Avenue
                            West, Suite 301-A,
                            Mountlake Terrace,
                            WA 98043.
018123F..................  Susie Gonzalez, Inc.  March 2, 2007.
                            dba F.R.I.E.N.D.S.
                            Cargo Int'l, 8367
                            NW 74th Street,
                            Miami, FL 33166.
------------------------------------------------------------------------



[[Page 19505]]

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
 [FR Doc. E7-7354 Filed 4-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
No. 53166.

#### Saccone, Speed & Jenney, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 108258-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainPooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2016, by and amongWELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS,LLC, as General Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., AS NCBMaster Servicer and as NCB Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC as Operation Advisor andas Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2016-C32 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of thisAgreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that:

 

1.     A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the periodfrom January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and ofits performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer,has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

SONTAY T. SMOTHERMAN, 

 

 Petitioner, Civ. No. 2:14-cv-972 

 Crim. No. 2:12-cr-055(3) 

 v. Judge Frost 

 Magistrate Judge King 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Respondent. 

ORDER 

 On April 24, 2015, the Magistrate Judge denied Petitioner’s Motion for Discovery, ECF 

No. 281, and recommended that Petitioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 276, and 

Motion for Relief from Judgment, ECF No. 280, be denied and that the Motion to Vacate

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, ECF No. 270, be dismissed. Order and Report and

Recommendation, ECF No. 287. On May 6, 2015, this Court denied Petitioner’s objections to 

the recommendation and dismissed the Motion to Vacate. Order, ECF No. 291. On May 11, 

2015, the Court denied Petitioner’s amended objections to the recommendation, denied 

Petitioner’s Motion for Plain Error Review to Report and Recommendation and denied 

Petitioner’s motion to reconsider the Magistrate Judge’s denial of Petitioner’s request to conduct 

discovery, Order, ECF No. 295, and on May 15, 2015, the Court denied Petitioner’s subsequent 

motion to reconsider. Order, ECF No. 296. This matter is now before the Court on Petitioner’s 

May 18, 2015 Motion for Relief from Judgment, ECF No. 300, and on Petitioner’s May 19, 2015 

motion for reconsideration of the Court’s May 11, 2015 Order. Motion for Reconsideration, ECF 

No. 301. 

Case: 2:12-cr-00055-GLF-TPK Doc #: 302 Filed: 05/20/15 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2 

 In his most recent motions, Petitioner complains that the Court dismissed the action on 

May 6, 2015, prior to the filing of Petitioner’s amended objections to the Magistrate Judge’s 

recommendation. However, the Court considered Petitioner’s amended objections in its May 11, 

2015 Order, ECF No. 295. 

 Northing stated in Petitioner’s most recent motions persuades the Court that its prior 

orders, and the dismissal of this action under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, were erroneous. 

 Petitioner’s Motion for Relief from Judgment, ECF No. 300, and Petitioner’s Motion for 

Reconsideration, ECF No. 301, are therefore DENIED.

 /s/ GREGORY L. FROST 

 GREGORY L. FROST 

 United States District Judge 

Case: 2:12-cr-00055-GLF-TPK Doc #: 302 Filed: 05/20/15 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 32


                          UNISOURCE ENERGY CORPORATION

                          TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY

                              ---------------------

                        STATEMENTS OF CORPORATE OFFICERS
           (Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

                              ---------------------

     Each of the undersigned, James S. Pignatelli, Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer of UniSource Energy Corporation and Tucson
Electric Power Company (each a "Company"), and Kevin P. Larson, Vice President,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of each Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that each Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of such Company.


May 9, 2005

                            /s/ James S. Pignatelli
                            ---------------------------------------------------
                                          James S. Pignatelli
                                 Chairman of the Board, President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                     UniSource Energy Corporation
                                     Tucson Electric Power Company


                            /s/ Kevin P. Larson
                            ---------------------------------------------------
                                           Kevin P. Larson
                                     Vice President, Treasurer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                      UniSource Energy Corporation
                                     Tucson Electric Power Company
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Franklin Hill Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2015
of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James Cassidy
                                 former Chief Executive OFficer
                                 former Chief Financial Officer
		           During the period covered
			   by this report

Date: July 28, 2016
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

8 June 2005

(2005/C 140/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
Case: 2:12-cv-00761-EAS-EPD Doc #: 26 Filed: 08/20/15 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
|  |   |  |
|--|--------|--|

|  |  |  |  
PROSTATE, LUNG, COLORECTAL & OVARIAN CANCER SCREENING TRIAL (PLCO)Participant Newsletters
Please select an issue of the newsletter from the list below.
- Winter 2001
- Spring/Summer 2000
- Spring/Summer 1999
- Fall/Winter 1998
- Spring/Summer 1998

**HOME | DICTIONARY | SITE MAP | SEARCHACCESSIBILITY | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT DCP** |
|--|--|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 278 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 278

Designating the week of October 23, 2005, through October 29, 2005, as 
         ``National Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 18, 2005

Mr. Reed (for himself, Ms. Collins, Mr. Bayh, Mr. Biden, Mr. Bond, Mrs. 
Boxer, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Carper, Mr. Chafee, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Cochran, 
    Mr. Corzine, Mr. Dayton, Mr. DeWine, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Durbin, Mr. 
   Feingold, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Hagel, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Isakson, Mr. 
     Jeffords, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Kohl, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. 
Lautenberg, Mr. Levin, Mr. Lieberman, Mrs. Lincoln, Ms. Mikulski, Mrs. 
Murray, Mr. Obama, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. Schumer, 
 Ms. Snowe, Mr. Specter, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Talent, Mr. Conrad, and Ms. 
Murkowski) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating the week of October 23, 2005, through October 29, 2005, as 
         ``National Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Week''.

Whereas lead poisoning is a leading environmental health hazard to children in 
        the United States;
Whereas according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 310,000 
        preschool children in the United States have harmful levels of lead in 
        their blood;
Whereas lead poisoning may cause serious, long-term harm to children, including 
        reduced intelligence and attention span, behavior problems, learning 
        disabilities, and impaired growth;
Whereas children from low-income families are significantly more likely to be 
        poisoned by lead than are children from high-income families;
Whereas children may be poisoned by lead in water, soil, or consumable products;
Whereas children most often are poisoned in their homes through exposure to lead 
        particles when lead-based paint deteriorates or is disturbed during home 
        renovation and repainting; and
Whereas lead poisoning crosses all barriers of race, income, and geography: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of October 23, 2005, through 
        October 29, 2005, as ``National Childhood Lead Poisoning 
        Prevention Week''; and
            (2) calls upon the people of the United States to observe 
        the week with appropriate programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 76/2004

of 8 June 2004         

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 26d (Commission Regulation (EC) No 792/94) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EC) No 2327/2003 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 June 2004, provided that all the notifications pursuant to Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 June 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

S. GILLESPIE            

----

(1)OJ L 130, 29.4.2004, p. 3.

(2)OJ L 345, 31.12.2003, p. 30.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----
III 

★(Star Print) 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 43 

Designating the first day of April 2005 as ‘‘National Asbestos Awareness 

Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2005 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mrs. MURRAY) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Committee discharged; considered, amended, and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the first day of April 2005 as ‘‘National 

Asbestos Awareness Day’’. 

Whereas dangerous asbestos fibers are invisible and cannot 

be smelled or tasted; 

Whereas the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers can cause 

significant damage; 

Whereas these fibers can cause mesothelioma, asbestosis, and 

other health problems; 

Whereas asbestos-related diseases can take 10 to 50 years to 

present themselves; 

Whereas the expected survival time for those diagnosed with 

mesothelioma is between 6 and 24 months; 
2 

SRES 43 ATS1S 

Whereas generally little is known about late stage treatment 

and there is no cure for asbestos-related diseases; 

Whereas early detection of asbestos-related diseases may give 

some patients increased treatment options and might improve their prognosis; 

Whereas the United States has substantially reduced its consumption of asbestos yet continues to consume almost 

7,000 metric tons of the fibrous mineral for use in certain products throughout the Nation; 

Whereas asbestos-related diseases have killed thousands of 

people in the United States; 

Whereas asbestos exposures continue and safety and prevention will reduce and has reduced significantly asbestos exposure and asbestos-related diseases; 

Whereas asbestos has been a cause of occupational cancer; 

Whereas thousands of workers in the United States face significant asbestos exposure; 

Whereas thousands of Americans die from asbestos-related 

diseases every year; 

Whereas a significant percentage of all asbestos-related disease victims were exposed to asbestos on naval ships and 

in shipyards; 

Whereas asbestos was used in the construction of a significant number of office buildings and public facilities built 

before 1975; and 

Whereas the establishment of a ‘‘National Asbestos Awareness Day’’ would raise public awareness about the prevalence of asbestos-related diseases and the dangers of asbestos exposure: Now, therefore, be it 
3 

SRES 43 ATS1S 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates the first day of 

2 April 2005 as ‘‘National Asbestos Awareness Day’’. 

Æ
— GULF OF ALASKA
UNITED STATES BATHYMETRIC MAP MUDDLETON ISLAND

ya
 ,-—s r i 7 us"

i -
rs) reset a

Pe) My

a

ar
“ue

cso: Suey? aoraesive Aadihett oe! Wartngten. 210

MIDDLETON ISLAND

US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NOS NO 6-2

NATIONAL OCTANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
i AMONAL OCEANS SERVICE

1988
= 5 featronnabting CONTEAIN wateavac Hp METERS. ( 2m0 went torihe
= 33 : z nt : MCE 0 METERS TO MANU KL Bo
a CEPT, BARAMATATED WG MATE DTH NaRS ee
eatHATED ee as

Ar Matas LOWE Lom wate | 7

eartotmt eatcance MONCTON a! am — 1
teste 11000 : -- / ts
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
 .
 1.
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of United Components, Inc. for the quarter ended September
30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of United Components, Inc.
  By:
    /s/ BRUCE M. ZORICHName:
    
    Bruce M. ZorichTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer  By:
    /s/ MARK P. BLAUFUSSName:
    
    Mark P. BlaufussTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
No. 58182.

protest 184942-K (New York).

#### J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, a copy of a letter, dated April 28, 1952, addressed to the collector of customs by J. J. Flynn, the assistant surveyor, was admitted in evidence as exhibit 1. The letter stated that the weigher’s dock book showed that the 410 cases were weighed in two truckloads on Government electric platform scales, resulting in a total gross weight of 52,915 pounds; that the total tare allowance of 7,329 pounds was based upon actual tares of 3 cases out of the lot; that “Subsequent inquiry reveals that 10 cases out of the lot were tared by Ledoux & Co., weighers for importer and average tare found as 18.3 lbs. which applied to the entire 410 cases, made a total tare allowance of 7503 lbs.”; and that “In view of the foregoing, this office believes government weighers dock tare of 3 eases to have been insufficient and not representative and therefore recommends that a total tare allowance of 7503 lbs. based upon merchants weighers tare of 10 cases, be made in reliquidation for the 410 cases in question.” In view of the surveyor’s letter, judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff directing the collector to use as a basis of assessing duty the gross weight, less a tare of 7,503 pounds rather than 7,329 pounds.