alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2022 ND 103

In the Matter of the Petition of Shane Lance Yates for Name Change

No. 20220054

In the Matter of the Petition of Amy Jo Yates for Name Change

No. 20220056

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Stephannie N

. Stiel , Judge.

AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam

. Shane L. Yates, self

- represented, Fargo, ND , appellant. Amy J

. Yates, self

- represented, Fargo, ND , appellant.1 Matter of Shane Lance Yates

No. 20220054 Matter of Amy Jo Yates No. 20220056
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Shane Lance Yates and Amy Jo Yates (“Petitioners”) appeal district court orders denying their petitions for name changes and requests for evidentiary hearings. The Petitioners sought to change their names from “SHANE LANCE YATES” (in all uppercase letters) to “Shane Lance Yates” and “AMY JO YATES” (in all uppercase letters) to “Amy Jo Yates.” The Petitioners argue the court erred because they are exercising their private core civilian rights and that they should have been granted a private evidentiary heari ng. We conclude the district court did not err in denying the petitions for name changes or requests for evidentiary hearings. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7); Matter of Yates , 2022 ND 11, ¶ 5 , 969 N.W.2d 195 (holding there was no proper and reasonable cause for the district court to change two individuals ’ names from all capital letters to initial capital letters followed by lowercase letters because such a request was not a change from one name to another); Matter of Mees , 465 N.W.2d 172, 173 (N.D. 1991) ( “Section 32

- 28

- 02, N.D.C.C., does not require an evidentiary hearing in conjunction with a petition for change of name.”).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 23, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-20529

Conference Calendar

 

JOE ADAM RAMIREZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LETICIA G. McQUEEN; JOHN CASTILLO;

SALVADOR BUENTELLO, also known as Sammy Salvador,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:04-CV-1986

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Joe Adam Ramirez, Texas prisoner #636417, appeals from the

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous and for

failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). 

Ramirez contends that his continued confinement in administrative

segregation violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth

Amendment and the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the

Eighth Amendment. We review the district court’s judgment
No. 04-20529

-2-

de novo, see Velasquez v. Woods, 329 F.3d 420, 421 (5th Cir.

2003), and we find no error.

First, Ramirez has failed to allege a protected liberty

interest that was violated by his placement in administrative

segregation due to classification as a gang member, see Pichardo

v. Kinker, 73 F.3d 612, 613 (5th Cir. 1996), by the failure of

officials to remove information about his gang affiliation from

his prison records, see Velasquez, 329 F.3d at 421-22, or by any

possible delays in Ramirez being considered for release on parole

or mandatory supervision. See Malchi v. Thaler, 211 F.3d 953,

957, 959 (5th Cir. 2000). Second, Ramirez has failed to allege

facts suggesting that the conditions of confinement in

administrative segregation reflect deliberate indifference to

his basic human needs. See Harper v. Showers, 174 F.3d 716, 719

(5th Cir. 1999). Finally, Ramirez is warned that the district

court’s dismissal of his action counts as one strike for purposes

of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that once he accumulates three strikes

he will be barred from proceeding in forma pauperis in any civil

action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in

any facility unless he “is under imminent danger of serious

physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

AFFIRMED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 348 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 348

Making minority party appointments to certain Senate committees for the 
                            109th Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 18, 2006

 Mr. Reid submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Making minority party appointments to certain Senate committees for the 
                            109th Congress.

    Resolved, That notwithstanding the provisions of rule XXV, the 
following shall constitute the minority party's membership on the 
following standing committees for the 109th Congress, or until their 
successors are chosen:
     Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs: Mr. Sarbanes 
(Ranking Member), Mr. Dodd, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Reed, Mr. Schumer, Mr. 
Bayh, Mr. Carper, Ms. Stabenow, and Mr. Menendez.
     Committee on Energy and Natural Resources: Mr. Bingaman (Ranking 
Member), Mr. Akaka, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Johnson, Ms. Landrieu, 
Mrs. Feinstein, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Salazar, and Mr. Menendez.
     Special Committee on Aging: Mr. Kohl (Ranking Member), Mr. 
Jeffords, Mr. Wyden, Mrs. Lincoln, Mr. Bayh, Mr. Carper, Mr. Nelson of 
Florida, Mrs. Clinton, and Mr. Salazar.
     Committee on the Budget: Mr. Conrad (Ranking Member), Mr. 
Sarbanes, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Feingold, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Byrd, 
Mr. Nelson of Florida, Ms. Stabenow, and Mr. Menendez.
     Select Committee on Ethics: Mr. Johnson (Vice Chairman), Mr. 
Pryor, and Mr. Salazar.
     Select Committee on Intelligence: Mr. Rockefeller (Vice Chairman), 
Mr. Levin, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Bayh, Ms. Mikulski, and Mr. 
Feingold.
                                 <all>
```
IIA 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 24 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative 

to the reference to God in the Pledge of Allegiance and on United 

States currency. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2005 

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relative to the reference to God in the Pledge 

of Allegiance and on United States currency. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within 7 years after the date of its submission by 

9 the Congress: 
2 

•SJ 24 IS 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. A reference to God in the Pledge of Alle3 giance or on United States currency shall not be construed 

4 as affecting the establishment of religion under the first 

5 article of amendment of this Constitution. 

6 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress shall have the power to en7 force this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ
# C_2008296EN.01002301.xml

| 19.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/23

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST/75/08

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

(2008/C 296/07)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising open competition EPSO/AST/75/08 for the recruitment of social welfare assistants (AST 3).

The competition notice is published in English, French and German only, in Official Journal C 296 A of 19 November 2008.

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://europa.eu/epso

---
(Reap. Dec. 9266)

#### H. A. Gogarty, Inc., a/c Nife, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 728487, etc.

(Decided December 9, 1958)

*Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

Tbe appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedules “A” and “B,” attached to and made part of tbe decision herein, have been consolidated for determination.

Tbe parties hereto have entered into a stipulation of fact, which reads as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court, as to the merchandise covered by Schedules A and B hereto attached and made a part hereof:

> 1. That at the time of exportation to the United States of the said merchandise described in Schedule A, such or similar merchandise was not offered for sale in the country of exportation for home consumption, exportation to the United States, or for sale in the United States under the terms and conditions as provided for in Section 402 (c), (d) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended; and that there was no foreign, export, or United States value for such or similar merchandise, as defined in each of the said subsections.

> 2. That the cost of production, as defined in Section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, was not higher than the respective values stated in Schedule A hereto attached.

> 3. That the Nife batteries enumerated in Schedule B, hereto attached and made a part hereof, on the respective dates of exportation, were freely offered *592for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Sweden, the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities, in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the said merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, at the prices stated in Schedule B; and that the prices for such or similar merchandise offered for sale for exportation to the United States were not higher than the prices for home consumption.

> 4. That as to all other merchandise not contained or described in Schedules A and B, the appeals for reappraisement are hereby abandoned.

Upon the agreed facts, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (f)), is the proper basis of value for the merchandise itemized in schedule “A,” attached hereto, and that said value is as shown therein. I further find and hold that foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)), as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, is the proper basis for the merchandise itemized in schedule “B,” attached hereto, and that said value is as indicated therein.

As to any other merchandise, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Todd Shipyards Corporation ("we", "us", "our") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of our operations.

 

Date: November 8, 2007

 

 

/s/ Stephen G. Welch

Stephen G. Welch, 

President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:12-cr-130

Mathew Ryan Byrd 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 43) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the indictment, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: October 18, 2012 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:12-cr-00130-JLG-TPK Doc #: 45 Filed: 10/18/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-00476-EAS-EPD Doc #: 11 Filed: 10/19/12 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00476-EAS-EPD Doc #: 11 Filed: 10/19/12 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T14:01:30-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 General Services Administration [FMR Bulletin PBS-2007-B1]
 AGENCY: Public Buildings Service (P), GSA.
 ACTION: Notice of a bulletin.
 SUMMARY: The attached bulletin announces the redesignation of a Federal Building.
 DATES: *Expiration Date:*
                         This bulletin expires August 5, 2007. However, the building redesignation announced by this bulletin will remain in effect until canceled or superseded.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: General Services Administration, Public Buildings Service (P), Attn: Anthony E. Costa, 1800 F Street, NW, Washington, DC 20405, e-mail at 
                        *anthony.costa@gsa.gov,*
                         (202) 501-1100.


Dated: February 28, 2007. Lurita Doan, Administrator of General Services.
 U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION **[FMR BULLETIN PBS-2007-B1]** **REDESIGNATIONS OF FEDERAL BUILDINGS** TO: Heads of Federal Agencies SUBJECT: Redesignations of Federal Buildings 1. 
                    *What is the purpose of this bulletin?*
                     This bulletin announces the redesignation of a Federal Building. 2. 
                    *When does this bulletin expire?*
                     This bulletin expires August 5, 2007. However, the building redesignation announced by this bulletin will remain in effect until canceled or superseded. 3. 
                    *Redesignation.*
                     The former and new names of the redesignated building are as follows: Former Name
New NameUnited States Post Office and Courthouse, 700 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15219.
United States Courthouse, 700 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15219.
 4. 
                    *Who should we contact for further information regarding redesignation of this Federal Building?*
                     U.S. General Services Administration, Public Buildings Service (P),Attn: Anthony E. Costa, 1800 F Street, NW, Washington, DC 20405, telephone number: (202) 501-1100, e-mail at 
                    *anthony.costa@gsa.gov.* Dated: February 28, 2007. Lurita Doan, Administrator of General Services.


[FR Doc. E7-7230 Filed 4-16-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820-23-S
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7462

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ARNULFO D. BENAVIDES, a/k/a Arnold, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-67, CA-97-92-4) Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 9, 1999 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arnulfo D. Benavides, Appellant Pro Se. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Arnulfo D. Benavides seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Benavides , Nos. CR-92-67; CA-97-92-4 (E.D. Va. July 29, 1998). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
----

| 1.   | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement and the Administrator under the Administration Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010 among the Issuer, CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Administrator (the "Administrator"), and the Indenture Trustee. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | This Officer's Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Section 3.9 of the Indenture. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on July 8, 2010 and ending on February 28, 2011 and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5.   | A review of the activities of the Issuer during the period beginning on July 8, 2010 and ending on February 28, 2011 and of the Issuer's performance under the Indenture was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Issuer has complied in all material respects with all conditions and covenants under the Indenture throughout such period. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

|   |   | /s/ Keith D. Browning    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|   |   | Keith D. Browning   |
|   |   | Executive Vice President |
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**Subsidiaries of Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP**

 
| **Entity Name**               | ** ** | **Jurisdiction** |
|------------------------------------|------------|------------------|
| Kimbell Intermediate Holdings, LLC |       | Delaware         |
| Kimbell Intermediate GP, LLC       |       | Delaware         |
| Kimbell Royalty Holdings, LLC      |       | Delaware         |
| Rivercrest Royalties, LLC          |       | Delaware         |
| Rochester Minerals, L.P.           |       | Texas            |
| Hochstetter, L.P.                  |       | Texas            |
| Oakwood Minerals I, L.P.           |       | Texas            |
| RCPTX, Ltd.                   |       | Texas            |
| OGM Partners I                     |       | Texas            |

 

----
Exhibit 35.2



LOGO

OFFICERS CERTIFICATE

C-III Asset Management LLC

The undersigned, Kevin Donahue, President of C-III Asset Management LLC (f/k/a Centerline Servicing LLC), the
Special Servicer under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2015, relating to the Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-G35, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2015-GC35(the Pooling and Servicing Agreement), hereby certifies as follows:



|1. | a review of the activities of the Special Servicer and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the preceding calendar year 2016 (the Reporting Period) has been made under the
undersigneds supervision;
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | to the best of the undersigneds knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer maintained an effective internal control system relating to its servicing of the Mortgage Loans serviced by it and has
fulfilled in all material respects its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout such Reporting Period.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Capitalized
terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,as of the 1st
day of March, 2017, I have hereunto signed my name.



/s/ Kevin DonahueKevin Donahue, PresidentC-III Asset Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company