alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports onForm 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report onForm 10-K of the Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-NXS5 (the"Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, takenas a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilledtheir obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessmentof compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required tobe included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report onForm 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, WilmingtonTrust, National Association, as Trustee, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, asOperating Advisor, CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant,Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing FunctionParticipant for the Certificate Administrator on and after November 1,2021, Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing FunctionParticipant for the Custodian on and after November 1, 2021, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer for the 10 South LaSalle StreetMortgage Loan, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee for the 10South LaSalle Street Mortgage Loan, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as OperatingAdvisor for the 10 South LaSalle Street Mortgage Loan, CoreLogic Solutions,LLC, as Servicing Function Participant for the 10 South LaSalle Street MortgageLoan, and Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as ServicingFunction Participant for the Custodian for the 10 South LaSalle Street MortgageLoan on and after November 1, 2021.

 

 

 

Dated:March 8,2022

 

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

Anthony Sfarra 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Regency
Affiliates, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Laurence S. Levy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
            Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of
            operations of the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: November 22, 2004

                                          /s/ Laurence S. Levy
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Laurence S. Levy
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
340000m.E

BATHYMETRIC MAP

BRISTOL BAY
GOODNEWS

4g0000m.£,

6650000m.N.

6 40000m.N,

KUSKOKWIM BAY NO'3-2

6550000n.NN_

2

Ba5000OR FT

Base map information including bathymetry was compiled by the National Ocean Service
(NOS). Bathymetry was compiled from NOS hydrographic surveys (see index). NOS hydro-
graphic survey data complies with International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) Publication
44 accuracy standards or those used at‘the date of the surveys. This is a reproduction of a
facsimile of the bathymetric manuscript and does not necessarily represent the final publica-
tion. This information is not intended for navigational purposes.
Bathymetric Contour Intervals: 10 meters to maximum depth, supplemented by 2 meter intervals.
Datum: Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW).
Universal Transverse Mercator Grid. Zone 4; 10,000 meter ticks (---) are shown inside the neat-
line.
Protraction Diagram data shown in a subdued (screened) black was compiled by the Minerals
Management Service (MMS).
THIS MAP IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal leasing purposes; for such purposes
use the MMS Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction Diagrams. .

Heavy line(s) indicate limits of these protraction diagrams.

HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMATION

suRvEY

LINE. SPACING
(NAUT. MILES)

1-18
10-1.0
10-16

OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE

1985

Produced at Washington, D.C.
for
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE

TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION
Scale 1:250,000

NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE
HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY INDEX

162° -
Photographic copies of the above and prior surveys may be obtained, at the cost of reproduction, by

20 Statute Miles
addressing the Director (N/CG243), National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administation, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

ies"

5 ° 5 10 15
—— SS
5 ° 5 10 15 20 25
————— =
° 5 10 15 Nautical Miles
— =

‘4goo0om.g,

GOODNEWS
NOS NO 4-1 (OCS)

ois INDEX TO ADJOINING SHEETS

| NO 4-1

wt

BRISTOL BAY

___|—

156°
ie1°

NAKNEK
NO at

58°
156°

HIN SIA HO NIdd 30 3903 HOILISO4

Nf "Smae peed
1Pursuant to 5 th CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 th CIR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 13, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 05-41596

_____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee v. JUSTIN WADE GRANTHAM

Defendant - Appellant

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas, Sherman

--------------------- Before KING, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s motion to vacate District Court’s judgment and remand case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s alternative motion to extend time to file appellee’s brief for twenty (20) days from this court’ s denial of motion to vacate and remand is DENIED AS MOOT.
Case No. 8,593.

#### LUCKETT v. WEST et al.

[4 Cranch, C. C. 101.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1830.

Shipping —Supercargo — Ostensible Owners— Right to Retain Balance — Secret Owner.

1. A supercargo who receives his instructions from the ostensible owners of the whole cargo, has a right to retain, out of the whole proceeds of the cargo, the amount of a general balance due to him from such ostensible owners, although there may be another part-owner, whose interest was not disclosed to him until he had settled his account with such ostensible owners.

2. In such ease, the secret part-owner cannot compel the supercargo to account with him.

Bill by a secret part-owner against a supercargo, to account for one eighth of the cargo of the brig Sea Horse.

CRANCH, Chief Judge

(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent).

The plaintiff’s intestate, Fielder Luckett, was owner of one eighth of the brig Sea Horse, of which vessel, J. & J. Harper owned the residue; and the said F. Luckett was, by agreement with the Harpers, owner also of one eighth of the cargo consigned by them to the defendant, John West, as supercargo, on a voyage to Rio Grande and a market. West was entirely ignorant of Luckett’s interest in the vessel or cargo; all the documents, excepting the register of the brig, being in the name of the Harpers, or of “the owners,” without naming them. West was the agent and factor of the Harpers only, and derived his authority from them alone. If he had a right to retain in his hands the proceeds of the cargo, on account of their debt to him, he had fully accounted with his principal before notice of the plaintiff’s claim, except the sum of $410.01, which he has paid to the plaintiff, with the assent of the other parties. Having been of opinion, in the preceding case of Vowell v. West [Case No. 17,024], that West had a right to retain so much of the proceeds of the cargo as would cover the debt of the Harpers to him, it follows, that, as he has accounted to them for the residue, he has now nothing more in his hands, and the bill, as to him, must be dismissed. Bill dismissed as to the defendant West.
No. 49366.

#### Protests 94036-K, etc., of Adolphe Hurst & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the hides in question are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Rice*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 118, C. D. 807), which record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith the claim at 10 percent was sustained as to certain of the mer•chandise in question.
No. 65670.

#### The Huffman Manufacturing Company *v.*United States,

protest 61/2184 (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Order entered January 5, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01625-CV

IN RE MARGIE CLARK, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 304th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-1043-W

ORDER

Before the Court is relator’s motion for temporary stay of proceedings in the trial court. 

We DENY the motion. We ABATE the mandamus proceeding pursuant to rule 7.2(b) of the 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. This case is removed from the Court’s active docket until 

further order of this Court to allow the successor judge to reconsider the challenged ruling of the 

trial court. The parties shall timely notify this Court of all events affecting the status of this case, 

including when the successor judge has ruled in accordance with rule 7.2(b). The parties shall 

file either a status report or a motion to dismiss by January 19, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 76 (Friday, April 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7567]



[[Page 19914]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL06-44-005]


Avista Energy, Inc.; Notice of Compliance Filing

April 13, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 30, 2007, Avista Energy, Inc. submitted a 
compliance filing pursuant to the Commission's March 14, 2007 request 
to explain and justify the price of one transaction in excess of the 
Commission's WECC price soft-cap of $400.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b1d1e091814353732353e082e2b2b34292f1b3d3e2938753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d3b382f3e3213111413182e080d0d120f093d1b180f1e531a120b">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 30, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-7567 Filed 4-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Product Name: ICYNENE MD-R-200 TM

Page 1 of 2 (F) Spray ICYNENE LD-C-50 TM 6747 Campobello Rd., Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L7, Canada Tel: 905.363.4040 Toll Free: 800.758.7325 Fax: 905.363.0102



### Section 1: Chemical, Product and Company Information

Product Name: ICYNENE MD-R-200 TM

ICYNENE MD-R-200 TM is a trademark of Icynene Inc.

Product Use: SPRAY-ON CELLULAR PLASTIC INSULATION
Product Code: Not Applicable
Revision Date: July 28, 2009



### Section 2: Ingredient Information
Ingredients (% w/v, unless otherwise noted) Cas No: Wt.%:
(BASE SEAL ® ), Component A CAS# 009016-87-9 50 % by volume (ICYNENE MD-R-200 TM ), Resin Component B 50 % by volume

NOTE : Does not contain any ozone destroying or global warmi ng refrigerants such as CFC’s, HCFC’s, or HFA’s.



### Section 3: PHYSICAL DATA
Appearance:

Solubility In Water: Density: Semi-rigid platinum coloured cellular foam of “angel food cake” consistency and appearance

Insoluble.
2.0 lbs./cubic foot
Odour: None
Emissions: Safe for occupancy after 24 hrs, no emissions detectable after 30 days.



### Section 4: FIRE & EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA Flammability: Combustion occurs at 400 ° F (material will not sustain combustion on its own) Flame Spread: Less than 20 Smoke Developed: Less than 400

Method Used: ASTM E84 Melting: Does not melt

Flammable Limits: LFL: - not determined UFL: - not determined Extinguishing Media: Water, carbon dioxide, dry chemical or foam.

# MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Product Name: ICYNENE MD-R-200 TM

Page 2 of 2 (F) Spray ICYNENE LD-C-50 TM Fire & Explosion Hazards: Prevent breathing of combustion fumes (smoke)
Fire Fighting Equipment: Firefighters must wear a self-contained breathing ap paratus to avoid breathing smoke generated by combustion.



### Section 5: REACTIVITY DATA
Stability: Stable under all normal conditions Incompatibility: Compatible with all products 

### Section 6: ENVIRONMENTAL & DISPOSAL INFORMATION
Disposal Method: Follow all federal, provincial, state and local regu lations. 

### Section 7: HEALTH HAZARD DATA

Detectable Emissions: No detectable emissions Systemic & Other Effects: Not available Ingestion: The consequences of ingestion of large amounts are un known
Dust Inhalation: May cause mechanical irritation to the respiratory syste m Eye Protection: Use glasses when cutting foam
Skin Protection: Dust from foam cutting may cause irritation 

### Section 8: FIRST AID
Ingestion: Medical advice should be obtained
Inhalation: Remove to fresh air, consult a physician Eye Contact: Flush with water to remove particles
Skin Contact: No special precautions required 

### Section 9: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THE INFORMATION HEREIN IS GIVEN IN GOOD FAITH, BUT NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IS MADE. CONTACT ICYNENE INC. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 

### Section 10: PREPARATION INFORMATION:
Prepared by: D.Thom
Title: R&D Manager Telephone: 1-800-758-7325 Date of Preparation: July 28, 2009
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
 .
 1.
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of United Components, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30,
2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of United Components, Inc.
  By:
    
    /s/ BRUCE M. ZORICHName: Bruce M. ZorichTitle: Chief Executive Officer
  By:
    
    /s/ DANIEL J. JOHNSTONName: Daniel J. JohnstonTitle: Chief Financial Officer
# C_2020358EN.01000201.xml

| 26.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 358/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 358/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9716 — AMS/OSRAM)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 358/02)

On 6 July 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9716. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9716. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 4.1



 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


240 Greenwich
Street, 22W Floor, New York, NY 10286


 


 


 


April 1, 2022


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 561 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York Mellon
is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”) included in the Registration
Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated
therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on March 31, 2022, in accordance with the valuation method set
forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York
Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-262209) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Units of the Trust and to the filing of this consent as an
exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                         


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
#### UNITED STATES, Appellant v THOMAS L. DeVORE, Private, U. S. Army, Appellee

10 USCMA 375, 27 CMR 449

*376No. 12,909

Decided April 24, 1959

*Lieutenant Colonel James G. MeConaughy*and *First Lieutenant Wade H. Sides, Jr.,*were on the brief for Appellant, United States.

*Colonel James Garnett, Captain Arnold I. Melnick,*and *First Lieutenant William L. Garwood,*were on the brief for Appellee, Accused.

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

The accused was convicted by a general court-martial of larceny of a wrist watch of some unspecified value, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921, and was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge and total forfeitures. The convening authority reduced the forfeitures to $55.00 per month for six months, suspended the discharge until completion of appellate review, and ordered execution of the forfeiture portion of the sentence. The board of review, describing the suspension as one of indefinite duration, purported to reduce the period thereof by fixing June 16, 1959, as the date on which the same would be remitted unless sooner vacated. With this modification it affirmed the approved sentence.

The Judge Advocate General of the Army, acting pursuant to Article 67 (b) (2) of the Code, supra, 10 USC § 867, has requested our action with respect to the following issue:

> Was the board of review correct in holding that, in the absence of confinement, the convening authority could not suspend the execution of the punitive discharge without providing for its automatic remission?

' In essence, this is the same question as that presented by United States v May, 10 USCMA 358, 27 CMR 432, decided this date. There we held:

> “. . . Once a convening authority so empowered, undertakes to suspend any portion of a sentence, such suspension — without reference to the language employed or omitted — constitutes the accused a probationer whose status may be changed only after a full hearing.”

Whether or not the approved sentence includes confinement is of no importance. United States v Cecil, 10 USCMA 371, 27 CMR 445.

These authorities eifectively dispose of the issue certified.

They do not completely dispose of the ease, however, for, by its terms, the suspension in this case was for the period of appellate review only. That period will expire prior to June 16, 1959. Since subsequent authorities cannot extend the period of suspension, this portion of the board’s action is illegal. United States v Butts, 7 USCMA 472, 22 CMR 262.

As thus modified, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs:

Latimer, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent.

My views on this question are set forth in my dissenting opinion in United States v May, 10 USCMA 358, 27 CMR 432, this day decided, and accordingly I must disagree with my brothers. I would answer the issue certified in the case at bar in the negative, and I would reverse the decision of the board of review.