alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2008266EN.01S00301.xml

| 21.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 266/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 266/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:13-cr-083(5)

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEMP

JONATHAN C. COOPER, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On May 10, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant Cooper’s guilty plea to Count

Ten of the Indictment charging him with receiving and transferring forged and counterfeited

obligations of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 473 and 2. Defendant, represented by

counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge

conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:13-cr-00083-GCS-TPK Doc #: 104 Filed: 06/12/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count Ten of the Indictment. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of

receiving and transferring forged and counterfeited obligations of the United States.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:13-cr-00083-GCS-TPK Doc #: 104 Filed: 06/12/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Le s]oco0mg.

BATHYMETRIC MAP

30"
|

CHUKCHI SEA

[__810000m.. 168°

“Sef ] nro LAs oe! 983 ) 984

70°

OF

LINE

| NR 2.6

7660000m.N)

—ENTIO|N

CONY

US-RUSSEA

sj0000mE, |

Base map information including bathymetry was compiled by the National
Ocean Service (NOS). Bathymetry was compiled from NOS hydrographic
surveys (see index). NOS hydrographic survey data complies with Inter-
national Hydrographic Organization (IHO) Special Publication 44 accuracy
standards or those used at the date of the survey. This is a reproduction of a
facsimile of the bathymetric manuscript and does not necessarily represent
the final ‘publication. This information is not intended for navigational
purposes.

Bathymetric Contour Interval: 10 meters to maximum depth, supplemented
by 2 meter intervals.

Datum: Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW).

Universal-Transverse Mercator Grid. Zone 2; 10,000 Meter Ticks (---) are
shown inside the neatline.

Protraction Diagram data shown in a subdued (screened) black was com-
piled by the Minerals Management Service {MMS}.

THIS MAP IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal leas:
such purposes use the MMS Outer Continental Shelf
Diagrams.

purposes; for
Protraction

Heavy line(s) indicate limits of these protraction diagrams.

HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMATION

SURVEY
SuRVEY suRVEY SURVEY LINE SPACING
NUMBER DATE SCALE, (NAUT, MILES)
H-8662 1961 1:160,000 40-18
#8663 1981 1:160,000 60-16
H-8665, 1962 1:100,000 30-15

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE

1986

Produced at Washington, D.C.
for

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE

TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION
Scale 1:250,000
10

15

OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MAP wae

NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE.
HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY INDEX

168°
708 1 470°
! H-8665'
i
1 H-8663
I~
\
i}
1
|
|
|
| we6ce
|
|
|
|
|
q
|
1
i
t
1
9° 1 69°
a7 Photographic copies of the above and prior surveys 168°

20 Statute Miles

5 10 15 20 25

30 Kilometers

15 Nautical Miles

may be obtained, at the cost of reproduction, by
addressing the Director (N/CG243), National
Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, Rockville, Maryland 20852

610000m.E

CHUKCHI SEA
NOS NR 2-6 (OCS)

INDEX TO
174° ADJOINING SHEET _165°
20 re ee oe ee

i
stuoos | coveert
| NR 28 NR O33
i
i
t
cHuxc | point LAY
Sea west
NR 26 NR 3S
1
i
T
point nee | pow HOPE
west, Neo?
| nee
68° 68°
ae t Tes°

|
|
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 77 (Monday, April 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7620]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-61,069; TA-W-61,069A; TA-W-61,069B]


Quaker Fabric Corporation of Fall River; Plants A/B-700, C-710 
and J-720; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on March 6, 2007 in response to a petition filed by the 
Trade Program Manager, Division of Career Service of Boston, 
Massachusetts on behalf of workers at Quaker Fabric Corporation of Fall 
River, Plant A/B-700, Fall River, Massachusetts, (TA-W-61,069), Plant 
C-710, Fall River, Massachusetts (TA-W-61,069A) and Plant J-720, Fall 
River, Massachusetts (TA-W-61,069B).
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 12th day of April 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-7620 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 318 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 318

       Designating November 27, 2005, as ``Drive Safer Sunday''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2005

  Mr. Chambliss (for himself and Mr. Isakson) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Designating November 27, 2005, as ``Drive Safer Sunday''.

Whereas motor vehicle travel is the primary means of transportation in the 
        United States;
Whereas everyone on the roads and highways needs to drive more safely to reduce 
        deaths and injuries resulting from motor vehicle accidents;
Whereas the death of almost 43,000 people a year in more than 6 million highway 
        crashes in America has been called an epidemic by Transportation 
        Secretary Norman Mineta;
Whereas according to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, 
        wearing a seat belt saved 15,434 lives in 2004; and
Whereas the Sunday after Thanksgiving is the busiest highway traffic day of the 
        year: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) encourages--
                    (A) high schools, colleges, universities, 
                administrators, teachers, primary schools, and 
                secondary schools to launch campus-wide educational 
                campaigns to urge students to be careful about safety 
                when driving;
                    (B) national trucking firms to alert their drivers 
                to be especially focused on driving safely during the 
                heaviest traffic day of the year, and to publicize the 
                importance of the day using Citizen's band (CB) radios 
                and in truck stops across the Nation;
                    (C) clergy to remind their members to travel safely 
                when attending services and gatherings;
                    (D) law enforcement personnel to remind drivers and 
                passengers to drive particularly safely on the Sunday 
                after Thanksgiving; and
                    (E) everyone to use the Sunday after Thanksgiving 
                as an opportunity to educate themselves about highway 
                safety; and
            (2) designates November 27, 2005, as ``Drive Safer 
        Sunday''.
                                 <all>
```
MICHAELGILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, PLLC

CERTIFIEDPUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

10544ALTON AVE NE

SEATTLE,WA 98125

206.353.5736

 

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

Tothe Board of Directors

InbitCorp.

 

Weconsent to the use of our report dated February 2, 2016 with respect to the financial statements of Inbit Corp. as of December31, 2015 and 2014 and the related statements of operations, shareholders’ equity/(deficit) and cash flows for the year endedDecember 31, 2015 and for the period from September 30, 2014 (inception) through December 31, 2014. We also consent to the referenceto our firm under the caption “Experts” in the Form 10-K/A.

 

MichaelGillespie & Associates, PLLC

Seattle,Washington

November30, 2017

 

/S/Michael Gillespie & Associates, PLLC

** **
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-171527) pertaining to the 2004 Share Incentive Plan and the 2010 Share Incentive Plan of E-Commerce China Dangdang Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of E-Commerce China Dangdang Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2011. 

/s/Ernst & Young Hua Ming 

Beijing, The People’s Republic of China 

April 2, 2012
Appendix A

 Hazardous Materials
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017(the “Report”) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael S. Gross, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to thebest of my knowledge, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 
 /S/    MICHAEL S.GROSS                **Name:** **Michael S. Gross****Date:** **April 26, 2018****
Case: 2:12-cv-01039-EAS-TPK Doc #: 24 Filed: 08/20/13 Page: 1 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01039-EAS-TPK Doc #: 24 Filed: 08/20/13 Page: 2 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01039-EAS-TPK Doc #: 24 Filed: 08/20/13 Page: 3 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T14:51:26-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6780
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM DAVID CLAPP, JR., Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-7-A, CA-97-258-R) Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 25, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William David Clapp, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Clapp , Nos. CR-94-7-A; CA-97-258-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7143

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DECARLOS ANTONIO WRIGHT, a/k/a Carlos Wright,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, 

Senior District Judge. (5:12-cr-00170-H-2; 5:13-cv-00342-H)

Submitted: August 31, 2015 Decided: September 10, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Decarlos Antonio Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Tobin Webb Lathan, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Decarlos Antonio Wright seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and the 

order denying his motion for reconsideration. We dismiss the 

appeal. 

First, Wright did not timely appeal the district court’s 

order denying his § 2255 motion. When the United States or its 

officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed 

no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court’s 

final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the 

district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil 

case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 

U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order denying Wright’s § 2255 motion 

was entered on the docket on April 7, 2014. Because Wright did 

not file his motion for reconsideration within 28 days of that 

order, his motion did not toll the 60-day appeal period. See

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). Therefore, 

because Wright failed to file a timely notice of appeal or 

obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, his 

notice of appeal, filed on July 28, 2014, was untimely as to the 
3

order denying his § 2255 motion, and we dismiss the appeal of 

the § 2255 order for lack of jurisdiction.

Wright’s appeal is timely as to the district court’s order 

denying his motion for reconsideration. However, on appeal, we 

confine our review to the issues raised in the appellant’s 

brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Wright’s informal brief does not 

challenge the basis for the district court’s denial of 

reconsideration. Because Wright has forfeited appellate review 

of the court’s order, he fails to demonstrate that the district 

court’s denial of reconsideration is debatable. We therefore 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal of 

the order denying reconsideration.

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and 

dismiss the appeal of both orders. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Official Journal C 191/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.191.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 191 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 562 July 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.191.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 191

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 562 July 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 191/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2013/C 191/02 | List of competent authorities referred to in Article 4(1) of Council Directive 2011/16/EU | 2 |
| 2013/C 191/03 | Value added tax (VAT) — Administrative cooperation — List of competent authorities referred to in Article 3 of the Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 (administrative cooperation and combating fraud in the field of value added tax) (This list reflects the Authorities in whose name the Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 of 7 October 2010 on administrative cooperation in the field of value added tax is to be applied, whether directly or by delegation) | 4 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 191/01

Euro exchange rates

1

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2013/C 191/02

List of competent authorities referred to in Article 4(1) of Council Directive 2011/16/EU

2

2013/C 191/03

Value added tax (VAT) — Administrative cooperation — List of competent authorities referred to in Article 3 of the Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 (administrative cooperation and combating fraud in the field of value added tax) (This list reflects the Authorities in whose name the Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 of 7 October 2010 on administrative cooperation in the field of value added tax is to be applied, whether directly or by delegation)

(This list reflects the Authorities in whose name the Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 of 7 October 2010 on administrative cooperation in the field of value added tax is to be applied, whether directly or by delegation)

4

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Case: 2:12-cv-01189-EAS-EPD Doc #: 59 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T10:49:54-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
EX-10.4 FIRST AMENDMENT TO LTD PARTNERSHIP AGMT









Exhibit 10.4





First Amendment to Limited Partnership Agreement of




Green REIT Operating Partnership, LP




     This First Amendment to Limited Partnership Agreement (this “Amendment”) of Green REIT
Operating Partnership, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”) is entered
into as of this 14th day of August, 2008, by Green Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation, as
the sole general partner (the “General Partner”).



     WHEREAS, the Partnership was formed on October 29, 2007 and is governed by that certain
Limited Partnership Agreement of Green REIT Operating Partnership, LP dated November 9, 2007 (the
“Agreement”);



     WHEREAS, the General Partner desires to amend the Agreement to correct a scrivener’s error;



     WHEREAS, Article 11 of the Agreement provides that the General Partner may so amend the
Agreement without the consent of the Limited Partners;



     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, the General Partner amends the Agreement as follows:



     1.     Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in
the Agreement.



     2.     Section 5.2(b)(i) is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:




     “(i) all distributions of Net Sales Proceeds shall be made: (A) first, 100% to
the OP Unitholders in accordance with their respective Percentage Interests on the
Partnership Record Date until the OP Unitholders have received cumulative
distributions under this Section 5.2(b) equal to the aggregate Capital Contributions
made by the OP Unitholders to the Partnership plus a cumulative, noncompounded
pre-tax rate of return thereon of 8.0% per annum, determined by taking into account
the dates on which all such Capital Contributions and distributions were made and
(B) second, (1) 85% to the OP Unitholders, in accordance with their respective
Percentage Interests on the Partnership Record Date and (2) 15% to the Special OP
Unitholders in accordance with their respective Special Percentage Interests on the
Partnership Record Date; and”



     2.     Except as set forth in this Amendment and as necessary to give full effect to the
provisions and intents hereof, the Agreement remains unmodified and in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the General Partner has affixed its signature to this Amendment as of the
date first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Green Realty Trust, Inc.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Wayne R. Hannah III
 	 
	 	 	Wayne R. Hannah III 	 
	 	 	President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FORM  10-QSB FOR THE THREE  MONTHS  ENDED  September  30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                         Jul-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                           SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                   1,402,720
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            2,548,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                                94,000
<INVENTORY>                                              1,354,409
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         5,580,738
<PP&E>                                                   2,202,633
<DEPRECIATION>                                             130,199
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           8,797,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    2,628,668
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                     8,789
<OTHER-SE>                                               4,660,475
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             8,797,932
<SALES>                                                  1,666,456
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         4,045,117
<CGS>                                                      653,361
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            4,514,470
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          11,777
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (579,604)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (579,604)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (579,604)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (.07)
        

</TABLE>