alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Ostigaard, Crystal

From: Becca Fischer [rebecca@northernplains.org]

Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 4:39 PM

To: Ostigaard, Crystal

Subject: Yellowstone Valley air quality comments

To whom it may concern,

As a life-time resident of Billings with asthma, I strongly support any steps toward cleaner air in 

Yellowstone County. Growing up in Billings has shaped my health for the rest of my life and I hope 

these new regulations will help other Billings residents breathe easier.

-- I support the EPA’s preliminary intention to designate Yellowstone County, Montana, as 

being in non-attainment in locations where existing monitoring data from 2009-2011 

indicate violations of the 1-hour SO2 standard. 

-- I would like to see all areas in locations with SO2violations included in the nonattainment areas. 

-- I support the EPA’s decision that it is not appropriate to disregard 2010 data, as was 

suggested by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality 

-- Yellowstone County residents deserve the right to breathe clean air. 

-- I support the EPA’s mission to protect human health and the environment. Thank you 

for your attention to this issue.

Rebecca Fischer

Lead Organizer 

Northern Plains Resource Council 

220 S. 27th Street, Suite A 

Billings, MT 59101 

phone 406.248.1154 x105 

fax 406.248.2110 

rebecca@northernplains.org

www.northernplains.org

Right-click 

here to 

download 

pictures. To 

help protect 

your privacy, 

Outlo ok 

prevented 

auto matic 

download of 

this picture 

from the 

Internet.

 

Northern Plains is a grassroots conservation and family agriculture group. We organize Montana citizens to 

protect our water quality, family farms and ranches, and unique quality of life. If you aren't already a member, 

you should join!
# EUR-Lex - 11957A179 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A179

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE FOUR - FINANCIAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 179 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 179

THE COMMISSION SHALL IMPLEMENT THE BUDGETS , IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE REGULATIONS MADE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 183 , ON ITS OWN RESPONSIBILITY AND WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE APPROPRIATIONS .

THE REGULATIONS SHALL LAY DOWN DETAILED RULES FOR EACH INSTITUTION CONCERNING ITS PART IN EFFECTING ITS OWN EXPENDITURE .

WITHIN THE BUDGETS , THE COMMISSION MAY , SUBJECT TO THE LIMITS AND CONDITIONS LAID DOWN IN THE REGULATIONS MADE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 183 , TRANSFER APPROPRIATIONS FROM ONE CHAPTER TO ANOTHER OR FROM ONE SUB-DIVISION TO ANOTHER .
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

HERBERT ANDERSON,

Plaintiff,

vs. Civil Action 2:12-CV-642 

 Judge Marbley

Magistrate Judge King

JULIE M. KAGEL,

Defendant.

ORDER

On July 20, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended

that the action be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to

state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Report and

Recommendation, Doc. No. 6. Although plaintiff was advised of his right

to object to the recommendation and of the consequences of his failure

to do so, plaintiff has filed no objection.

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED. This action

is hereby DISMISSED.

The Clerk shall enter FINAL JUDGMENT in this action. Moreover, the

Court concludes that an appeal from that judgment would not be taken in

good faith.

 s/Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley

 United States District Judge 

Case: 2:12-cv-00642-ALM-NMK Doc #: 7 Filed: 08/28/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL IMFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, CONTAINED IN TRANSCONTINENTAL
GAS PIPE LINE CORPORATION'S 1999 FIRST QUARTER REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,039
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,469
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     73,893
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               617,936
<PP&E>                                       4,221,137
<DEPRECIATION>                                 595,503
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,452,423
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          405,310
<BONDS>                                        975,662
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,097,183
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,452,423
<SALES>                                        148,071
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               354,222
<CGS>                                          148,071
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  248,649
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,052
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 57,621
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,479
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,142
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,142
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 31, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60447

Summary Calendar

MOHAMMAD ALI RAZA

Petitioner

v.

ALBERTO R GONZALES, US ATTORNEY GENERAL

Respondent

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A78 554 614

--------------------

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mohammad Ali Raza, a native and citizen of Pakistan,

petitions for review of an order from the Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) affirming the immigration judge’s (IJ) decision to

deny his application for cancellation of removal. Raza argues

that the IJ’s denial of his motion for a continuance based on his

pending application for labor certification was inconsistent with

8 U.S.C. § 1255(i) because it was based on the Government’s

objection alone. He further contends that the BIA’s

determination that there was no good cause for a continuance
No. 05-60447

-2-

because of the uncertainty of his receiving the labor

certification or an employment-based immigrant visa was not

supported by the record. 

The IJ adopted the Government’s argument that a continuance

would have been speculative. Raza’s timely application for labor

certification did not constitute good cause for a continuance

because the grant of the certification would have been only the

first step in a long, discretionary process. See Ahmed v.

Gonzales, 447 F.3d 433, 438-39 (5th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, the

denial of Raza’s motion for a continuance was supported by the

record and was not an abuse of discretion. See Patel v. INS, 803

F.2d 804, 806 (5th Cir. 1986). 

Raza also argues for the first time in his petition for

review that the IJ’s denial of his motion for a continuance

violated his due process rights because he was prevented from

pursuing an adjustment of status under § 1255(i). Because Raza

has not exhausted his administrative remedies concerning this

issue by first raising it before the BIA, we lack jurisdiction to

consider it. See Wang v. Ashcroft, 260 F.3d 448, 452 (5th Cir.

2001). 

Raza’s petition for review is DENIED.
CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form
10-K of Health In Harmony Inc., for the year ending October 31, 2012, I, Nickolay Kukekov, the principal financial officer
of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



1.     Such yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ending October
31, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.     The information contained in such yearly report on Form 10-K
for the year ended October 31, 2012, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Health In Harmony Inc.



|Date: February 13, 2013                              | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                     | 
|/s/ Nickolay Kukekov                                 | 
|Nickolay Kukekov
        Principal Financial Officer |
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14

- 796 V

Filed: May 7, 2015

Not for P ublication

*************************************

JACQUELINE FREEMAN

, *

*

Petitioner

, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision b ased on

* s tipulation of f

act

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Maximill ian J. Mu ller

, Philadelphia, PA

, for petitioner.

Camille M. Collett , Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS ’ FEES AND COSTS 1

On May 6 , 2015 , the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case

.

I n accordance with t he General Order #9 r equiremen t, petitioner assert s that s he did not

incur any costs in pursuit of he r petition. Petitioner submitted a draft application for attorne ys’

f ees and costs to respondent

. During informal discussions, respondent ra ised objections t o certain

items in petitioner’ s application

. Based on these objections, petitioner amend s her application for

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation f or the special master’ s action in this

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal

Claims’ s website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899,

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decision s of the special masters will be made

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly

unwarr anted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and

move to redact such information prior to the document = s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,

agrees that the identified material fits within the b anned categories listed above, the special master shall

redact such material from public access.2

attor ne ys’ fees and costs to $ 16 ,484 .53

. Respondent does not object to this amount. The

undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards $ 16 ,484 .53

, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a

chec k payable jointly to petitioner and M u ller Brazil, L LP in the amount of $ 16 ,484 .53

.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursu ant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the

court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 7, 2015 s/ Laura D. Millman

Laura D. Millman

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party , either separately or

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
Great Lakes Data Rescue Project - Lake Ontario BathymetryIntroduction | Geomorphology | VectorsGridded Data and Shaded Relief ImagesTHIS DATA IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATIONAlthough       these data are of high quality and useful for planning and modeling       purposes, they do not necessarily reflect current conditions, nor do they       depict data which is on a nautical chart. For navigation please refer to       the NOS nautical chart series.       Click on 1 degree areasfor shaded       relief imagesor      (The CD-ROM containsthe Design a       Griddata extractor)More on Images
A LARGE MAP(1.9 mb) version of the image above is also available for viewing. All of the Canadian topographic(land) pixels on these images bounded by 44N and 43.25N, 80.5W and 77.5W were generated from a Geological Survey of Canada(GSC) 30 meter gridded dataset. The 30 meter gridded data can be obtained from the GSC and other images were generated from this data by the GSC. All of the other areas on these maps were generated from the gridded data on this CD-ROM.
Introduction | Geomorphology | Vectors
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

** **

** **

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofDecember 1, 2015, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage SecuritiesCorp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer, Midland Loan Services, A Division of PNC Bank, National Association,as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as  Trustee, andPentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset RepresentationsReviewer, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2015-JP1 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Exhibit 35.2



LOGO

OFFICERS CERTIFICATE

C-III Asset Management LLC

The
undersigned, Kevin Donahue, President of C-III Asset Management LLC (f/k/a Centerline Servicing LLC), the Special Servicer under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2015, relating to the Citigroup
Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC35 (the Pooling and Servicing Agreement), hereby certifies as follows:



|1. | a review of the activities of the Special Servicer and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the preceding calendar year 2015 (the Reporting Period) has been made under the
undersigneds supervision;
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | to the best of the undersigneds knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer maintained an effective internal control system relating to its servicing of the Mortgage Loans serviced by it and has
fulfilled in all material respects its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout such calendar year 2015.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, as of the 1st day of March, 2016, I have hereunto signed my name.



LOGOKevin Donahue, PresidentC-III Asset Management LLC, aDelaware limited liability company


CGCMT 2015-GC35
No. 56600.

protest 73424-K (San Francisco).

#### Paul S. Linforth *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Regency
Affiliates, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Neil N. Hasson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
            Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of
            operations of the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: May 23, 2005


                                                /s/ Neil N. Hasson
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Neil N. Hasson
                                                Chief Financial Officer


                                                                              20
No. 64315.

protest 59/13705 (New York).

#### Bibi & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 39012.

#### Protests 48530-G, etc., of G. G. Bode et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record established that certain items consist of rugs in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
Before the Second Division,

July 15, 1938

No. 39008.

#### Protests 93544-G, etc., of Max Mandel Laces, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record established that certain items consist of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense. 

# ACTION:

Record of decision. 

# SUMMARY:

                        On March 20, 2007, the United States Air Force signed a Record of Decision for the Realistic Bomber Training Initiative Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. This decision was based on information, analysis, and public comments contained in both the Environmental Impact Statement for the Realistic Bomber Training Initiative (                        **Federal Register**                         Notice of Availability February 4, 2000) and the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Realistic Bomber Training Initiative (                        **Federal Register**                         Notice of Availability published August 11, 2006), along with other relevant factors. After carefully considering the issues addressed in the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement and the comments submitted, the Air Force decided not to change the decision described in the initial Record of Decision and to continue implementation of Alternative B of the Realistic Bomber Training Initiative. This alternative includes the use of appropriate training assets associated with Instrument Route IR-178/Lancer Military Operations Area. As indicated above, a Notice of Availability of the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 11, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 155, Page 46220). The required 30-day waiting period for a Record of Decision has been completed.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sheryl K. Parker, Headquarters Air Combat Command, A7ZP/Comprehensive Planning Branch, 129 Andrews St., Suite 102, Langley AFB, VA 23655 or call (757) 764-9334. 

Bao-Anh Trinh, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

 [FR Doc. E7-7333 Filed 4-17-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-05-P