alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 49847.

#### Protest 58775-K of John A. Conkey & Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise-in question is the same in all material respects as the East India partially tanned cowhides, the subject of *Rice*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 118, C. D. 807). In accordance therewith the claim at 10 percent was sustained.
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                    TRANSAMERICA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS FROM CONTINUING
                          OPERATIONS TO FIXED CHARGES


                                                      Three months ended
                                                           March 31,
                                                      1998          1997
                                                 (Dollar amounts in millions)


Fixed charges:
     Interest and debt expense                   $    104.9      $    101.4
     One-third of rental expense                        9.0             9.3
     Dividends declared on preferred
       securities issued by affiliates                 14.1             9.9
                                                 ----------      ----------
         Total                                   $    128.0      $    120.6
                                                 ==========      ==========

Earnings:
     Net income                                  $    153.7      $     81.0
     Provision for income taxes                        75.2            36.1
     Fixed charges                                    128.0           120.6
                                                 ----------      ----------
         Total                                   $    356.9      $    237.7
                                                 ==========      ==========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                     2.79            1.97
                                                       ====            ====
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Dale H. Sizemore, Jr., certify that:

1.       I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Torotel, Inc.

2.       Based onmy knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.       Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.       The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:

a)       designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

b)       evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 daysprior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c)       presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

a)       all significant deficiencies in thedesign or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial dataand have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses ininternal controls; and

b)       any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

6.       The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicatedin this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes ininternal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internalcontrols subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including anycorrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses.
| /s/ Dale H. Sizemore, Jr. |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   |   |
|                           |   |   |
|                           |   |   |
| Dale H. Sizemore, Jr.          |   |
| Chief Executive Officer        |   |
| December 10, 2006              |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer Perry Hill Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016
of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James Cassidy
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 11, 2016
No. 53703.

protest 146309-K (Philadelphia).

#### Cedars Importing Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v GEORGE S. BALLARD, Private, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

16 USCMA 483, 37 CMR 103

No. 19,859

January 20, 1967

*Captain John P. Gleeson,*USN, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel J. E. Hanthorn,*USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The accused’s conviction of absence without leave, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 86, 10 USC § 886, led to a sentence of bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of $65.00 per month for six months, and confinement at hard labor for a like period. As a result of action by the board of review, he stands before this Court with a penalty of confinement at hard labor for six months and forfeiture of $62.00 per month for six months, it having disapproved the punitive discharge.

Our review of the record discloses a number of errors in connection with revision proceedings previously held in the case in an attempt to correct errors in the presentencing proceedings. See United States v Yerger, 1 USCMA 288, 3 CMR 22. The board of review also found such errors to exist and held the revision proceedings a nullity. It nevertheless purported to affirm a portion of the-sentence. As such proceedings, however, were a nullity, no basis for affirmance existed. Hence, the sentence must be disapproved.

In light of the fact that the accused has long since served those portions of the sentence made effective against him and the relatively insignificant length of the unauthorized absence with which he is charged, we deem it unnecessary to require him to undergo a rehearing in this case. See United States v Sheeks, 16 USCMA 430, 37 CMR 50.

The petition for review is granted *484and the decision of the board of review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. The charge is ordered dismissed,
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BRUCE MCEACHERN
, Appellant,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
, Appellee

.

No s . 4D 18

- 2064 and 4D18

- 3243

[ September 10, 2020 ]

Consolidated n onfinal a ppeal s from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Joel T. Lazarus , Judge;

L.T. Case No s

. CACE 10

- 08803

.

Claire Cubbin, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Jason F. Joseph and Andrea Tromberg of Tromberg Law Group, Boca Raton, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

D AMOORGIAN
, G ERBER and F ORST
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TOREADOR
ROYALTY CORPORATION UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH
31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,422,579
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  242,104
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,753,155
<PP&E>                                       4,849,549
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,636,450)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,074,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,821
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       836,964
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,048,138
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,074,343
<SALES>                                        677,835
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               825,150
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  553,068
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                272,082
<INCOME-TAX>                                    87,877
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            184,205
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   184,205
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Case: 2:12-cv-00377-EAS-EPD Doc #: 19 Filed: 06/28/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T11:23:18-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
No. 65672.

#### Anchor Pipe & Tube Co. *v.*United States,

protest 60/11828 (New York).

*494Opinion by

La whence, J.

From a review of the record in this case, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector. The protest was, therefore, overruled.
GULF OF ALASKA

BATHYMETRIC MAP SURVEYOR SEACHANNEL ~

670000m.E.

1004

Bi70000m-N

IH NV Id

ao

6320000m.NN

T z : i H t I ! > i Hl ji “ - J
5] 000m. : 670000m.E,

Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service (NOS) from Bathymetric Data other than EVALUATION OF BATHYMETRIC_DATA OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE. MANAGEMENT MAP . aie BATHYMETRIC DATA INDEX — . tase SURVEYOR SEACHANNEL

NOS hydrographic surveys. This is a facsimile reproduction of the bathymetric manuscript and 7 . se 58°
does not necessarily represent the final published form. This information is not intended for
navigational purposes. . : UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE : NOS NO 6-6 (OCS)
Bathymetric Contour Intervals: 50 meters to maximum depth, supplemented by 10 meter NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
intervals. Random Trockiines ond Gothyrmetie Survey doted 1844 to 1980. NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE
Datum: Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW). 11,000,555 wi 9 minim line spacing of 80'ond 9 maximum
- Universal Transverse Mercator Grid. Zone 6; 10,000 meter ticks (~-).are shown inside the ata orastd for sound velocity acording to EchoScunding : 1988
neatline. orvection Tables, °
Produced at Washington, D.C. jathymetri rom sources other than
Protraction Diagram data shown in a subdued (screened). black was compiled by the Minerals f 9 . sai oS Moraueapaie suns . iso INDEX TO ADJOINING SHEETS .

: : 8 + . ‘or > 150: 141
Management Service (MMS}. 59 ——_— 59°
THIS MAP IS NOT A ‘or Federal leasing purposes; for such purposes somock aut voy Bay
use the MMS Outer Co action Diagrams UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ANS SEAMOUNT Sours, |

) indicote limits of these protraction dic MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE — —|
suavevon = |
SEACUANREL ¥
Noes y
lL . $
TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION . en > ae? . 4°
Scale 1:250,000 seattount & |
—_ o 10 15 _ 20 Statute Miles ser +0
5 ° 5 10 15 20 25 30 Kilometers ware
SoS i
5 ° 5 10 15 Nautical Miles
j

= F
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 77 (Monday, April 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7656]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center Web site at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 18, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Burl Thornton, Assistant Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Broadway Bancorp, Inc., Chicago, Illinois; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Broadway Bank, Chicago, Illinois.
    2. St. Anne Bancorp, Inc., St. Anne, Illinois; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
National Bank of Saint Anne, Saint Anne, Illinois.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Donna J. Ward, Assistant 
Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Young Partners, L.P., and Young Corporation; to indirectly 
acquire, and Citizens Bancshares Co., all of Chillicothe, Missouri, to 
directly acquire, additional voting shares for a total of 22.1 percent 
of the voting shares of First Community Bancshares, Inc., Overland 
Park, Kansas, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares 
of First Community Bank, Lee's Summit, Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 18, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-7656 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of NYFIX,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Peter K.  Hansen,
Chairman,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Peter K. Hansen
--------------------------------
Peter K. Hansen
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
May 28, 2004

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to NYFIX, Inc. and will be retained by NYFIX, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      37,713
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              587,649
<ALLOWANCES>                                21,603
<INVENTORY>                                542,029
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         1,202,047
<PP&E>                                   7,293,164
<DEPRECIATION>                           3,587,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           5,191,385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      863,516
<BONDS>                                  1,301,629
<COMMON>                                    69,184
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                               1,895,956
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             5,191,385
<SALES>                                  3,385,948
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         3,385,948
<CGS>                                    2,586,823
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            3,241,222<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,604
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          87,324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             54,798
<INCOME-TAX>                                22,910
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         23,711<F2>
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                23,711
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.34

<FN>

<F1> INCLUDES A SPECIAL CHARGE OF $39.8 MILLION PRE-TAX RELATING TO
     RESTRUCTURING AND REORGANIZATION CHARGES AND ASSET WRITE-DOWNS.
<F2> REFLECTS ADJUSTMENT FOR MINORITY INTEREST (NET OF TAX) OF $8,177

</FN>
        



</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 8817)

#### N. M. Albert Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 834579, etc.

(Decided June 5, 1957)

*Joseph Winston*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrenoe, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule of appeals, attached to and made part of the decision herein, present the question of the proper dutiable value of certain flashlights.

The parties hereto have stipulated and agreed that, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States, are the prices as shown in schedule “A,” attached to and made part of this decision, for the respective models of flashlights. It was further stipulated and agreed that there was no foreign value for such or similar merchandise at the time of exportation thereof.

Upon the agreed statement of facts, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 Ü. S. C. § 1402 (d)), is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such value is as shown in schedule *“A,”*attached to and made part of this decision.

As to all other items of merchandise covered by the appeals for a reappraisement herein, there is no evidence to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the appraiser’s action. Therefore, the proper value of items of merchandise other than those enumerated in schedule *“A,” supra,*is the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will issue accordingly.