alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 23, 2015

Derick Seaton

P.O. Box 57

Savannah, TN 38372

Dear Mr. Seaton:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 11, 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

1554), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
SCPW-21-0000043
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

I N RE CHRIS SLAVICK, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Chris Slavick’s petition for writ of mandamus, filed on February 1, 2021, the supporting documents, and the record, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that he has a clear and indisputable right to the requested relief and has alternative means to seek relief, including seeking relief in the circuit court case (Case No. 1PC041001534), which petitioner is currently pursuing, or seeking relief from the Hawai # i Paroling Authority, as provided by law. Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to the requested extraordinary writ. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-21-0000043 12-FEB-2021 09:11 AM Dkt. 8 ODDPmeans to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the

requested action). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, February 12, 2021. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the March 31, 1997 condensed consolidated balance sheet, condensed consolidated 
statement of income for the three months ended March 31, 1997, and the notes 
thereto, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                     72,520
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                              78,338
<ALLOWANCES>                                4,054
<INVENTORY>                                68,725
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                0<F1>
<PP&E>                                  2,890,509
<DEPRECIATION>                          1,269,892
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          2,138,239      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           0<F1>      
<BONDS>                                   876,225
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                  106,689
<OTHER-SE>                                464,691
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            2,138,239
<SALES>                                    49,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          190,548<F2>
<CGS>                                      42,975
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             120,185
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         19,045
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            37,353
<INCOME-TAX>                               13,723
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        23,630
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               23,630
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0
<FN>

<F1> The Company issues financial statements utilizing a non-classified balance 
     sheet.

<F2> The Company's revenues are derived primarily from railcar leasing.

<F3> The Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary.
</FN>
         

</TABLE>
Case: 2:12-cv-01184-EAS-EPD Doc #: 55 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T10:11:16-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
       
<S>                                     <C>       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Aug-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          Sep-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            Nov-30-1997                     
<CASH>                                          326
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                326    
<PP&E>                                      509,888
<DEPRECIATION>                              425,895
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              172,100    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     4,763,609
<BONDS>                                           0 
<COMMON>                                 38,258,096
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                        0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                172,100
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  0
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (615,472)  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             99,160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          497,112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              19,200
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                               (615,472)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .01
        

</TABLE>
Figure 1-1 
Figure 1-1 

Conceptual View of Major elements of the Build Alternative 

Source: Parsons Brinckerhoff 2008
Figure 1-2 
Figure 1-2 

Cross-Section View of the Build Alternative 

Source: Parsons Brinckerhoff, June 2008
Appendix A: 

Impact Mitigation Measures 









Appendix B: 

Amended Memorandum of Agreement among FRA, FTA, RTD and SHPO 



Appendix C:

Final EIS Comments and Responses 















































Appendix D: 

Final EIS Errata
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To Management of AEGON USARealty Advisors, LLC

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying *Report onAssessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item1122(d) of Regulation AB under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934*, thatAEGON USA Realty Advisors, LLC (“AEGON” or the“Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for thecommercial mortgage backed securities transactions listed in management’sassertion (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for theyear then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i),1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix),1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii),1122(d)(4)(xiv) and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which AEGON has determined are notapplicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to thePlatform. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with theservicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion onmanagement’s assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedasset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing ofselected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that AEGON complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 28, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F:(816)218 1890,*www.pwc.com/us
Exhibit 23.2



LOGO

CONSENT OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.

INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.
333-181820) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-171333) of our letter report dated November 12, 2013, with respect to the proved oil, gas and natural gas liquids reserves and projected future net revenues associated with these reserves as of
December 31, 2012 attributable to QR Energy, LP, and consent to its use and inclusion in the Form 10-K Annual Report and in the Form 10-K/A for QR Energy, LP and to all references to our firm included therein.

The analysis, conclusions, and methods contained in the report are based upon information that was in existence at the time the report was
rendered and Miller and Lents, Ltd. has not updated and undertakes no duty to update anything contained in the report. While the report may be used as a descriptive resource, investors are advised that Miller and Lents, Ltd. has not verified
information provided by others except as specifically noted in the report, and Miller and Lents, Ltd. makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of such information. Moreover, the conclusions contained in such report are based on
assumptions that Miller and Lents, Ltd. believed were reasonable at the time of their preparation and that are described in such report in reasonable detail. However, there are a wide range of uncertainties and risks that are outside of the control
of Miller and Lents, Ltd. which may impact these assumptions, including but not limited to unforeseen market changes, actions of governments or individuals, natural events, economic changes, and changes of laws and regulations or interpretation of
laws and regulations.



MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.By:

/s/ R. Lee Comer, Jr.R. Lee Comer, Jr.Vice President


Houston, Texas

November 14, 2013
Rabbi Jeffrey Saxe EPA Testimony 

Temple Rodef Shalom July 30, 2014 

Falls Church, VA 703-532-2217 

info@temp!erodefshalom.org 

My name is Jeffrey Saxe, and I am a rabbi from Temple Rodef Shalom in Falls Church, VA. I have three 

young children who cannot fathom the challenges we are addressing today, but who are constant!y 

amazed at the beauty of the wor!d around them. I draw my inspiration from them. I a!so draw it from 

my religious tradition. Jewish teaching tells us the following story: after God finished creating the wor!d, 

God wa!ked the first humans around the Garden of Eden, and said to them, "Look at my works! See 

how beautiful they are, how excellent! For your sake I created them all. See to it that you do not spoil 

and destroy my wor!d, for if you do, there will be no one e!se to repair it." I imagine that this warning 

would have seemed strange to Adam and Eve. How could they ever destroy God's creation? What 

danger was God alluding to, that they cou!d not see? 

I am amazed by this legend, written down thousands of years ago by sages who, like my children, cou!d 

have had no idea of the threats the earth sees today. I am amazed, also, at how difficult it is for us to 

heed these words, knowing everything we know now. 

In my community, there is a group of dedicated members who are constantly searching for ways to help 

our congregation reduce its carbon footprint, do a better job minimizing and recyc!ing the waste created 

by our 5000 members, and educate our community on the need to remember God's warning to 

humanity. This is hard work, for so many reasons: It's hard to solve complex prob!ems; it's hard to 

balance competing needs, and it's hard to help peop!e remember, in their daily lives, to consider 

consequences that we cannot see. It's hard to consider our wor!d and its future when all we can see is 

what is in front of us today. 

This is why we need the wisdom of our traditions, and it is why we need national leaders who will take 

action with a larger vision in mind to protect our future. 

The Green Team of my congregation can on!y do so much, and that is why they are here with me today. 

we know that a solar panel on our Temp!e's rooftop and a sound p!an to dispose of our waste are like 

drops in the sea. You, on the other hand, can make a big difference, and these carbon pollution limits 

are an important part of that. You can he!p to ensure that we do not destroy our wor!d, so that my 

chi!dren, and yours, can enjoy it. 

I am a!so here today as an American. This nation is not founded on a principle of letting events take 

place around us, come what may. The American way is to take control of our own future and work 

towards a vision of what it should be. As a rabbi, I am commanded by my re!igious tradition not to 

remain indifferent. As an American, I am asking my leaders to show us a vision of a strong and healthy 

earth, and to act on that vision. I am here to be a part of that. I have faith that this country can show 

visionary leadership in protecting our wor!d, and I support the EPA's leadership in making that hope a 

rea!ity.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

# AGENCY:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

# ACTION:

Notice of issuance; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects a notice, appearing in the                         **Federal Register**                         on March 22, 2007 (72 FR 13534), that announces the availability of a final interim staff guidance document on “Preclosure Safety                               ( print page 19554)                            Analysis—Level of Information and Reliability Estimation.” This action is necessary to correct typographical errors.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:

                        Jon Chen, Project Manager, Division of High-Level Waste Repository Safety, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001 [Telephone: (301) 415-5526; fax number: (301) 415-5399; e-mail:                         *jcc2@nrc.gov.*]                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On page 13534, in the middle column, in the first paragraph, last sentence, “waste at a geologic repository” is changed to “waste geologic repository.” 

On page 13536, in the middle column, in the fourth complete paragraph, lines 4-5, “DOE should to consider” is changed to read “DOE should consider.” 

On page 13536, in the middle column, in the fourth complete paragraph, lines 7-8, “DOE should to provide” is changed to read “DOE should provide.” 

                    On page 13537, in the third column, in the eighth complete paragraph, lines 1-2, “Lines 445: Though 453: λ was changed to, to distinguish this quantity” is changed to “Lines 445 through 453: λ was changed to p                                         to distinguish this quantity.”                 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day of April, 2007. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

N. King Stablein, 

 Chief Project-Management Branch B, Division of High-Level Repository Safety, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.

 [FR Doc. E7-7373 Filed 4-17-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1842/2004

of 22 October 2004         

allowing the coexistence of the name ‘Munster or Munster-Géromé’ registered as a Protected Designation of Origin under Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 and the unregistered name ‘Münster Käse’ designating a place in Germany

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 of 14 July 1992 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1) and in particular Articles 13(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   The name ‘Münster Käse’ shall be allowed to coexist with the name ‘Munster or Munster-Géromé’ registered as a Protected Designation of Origin under Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92.

2.   The period of coexistence shall expire fifteen years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation, after which the unregistered name shall cease to be used.

3.   Germany as the country of origin shall be clearly and visibly indicated on the label of cheese bearing the name ‘Münster Käse’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 October 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 208, 24.7.1992, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1215/2004 (OJ L 232, 1.7.2004, p. 21).

(2)OJ L 148, 21.06.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1345/2004 (OJ L 249, 23.7.2004, p. 14).

(3)OJ L 99, 17.4.2003, p. 1.

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In Connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Properties Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
R. Willard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/Thomas R. Willard
--------------------
Thomas R. Willard
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2005


                                       28
# CA2005197EN.01000101.xml

| 12.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 197/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 197/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---