alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLectures series in computational fluid dynamicsThe lecture notes cover the basic principles of computational fluid dynamics (CFD). They are oriented more toward practical applications than theory, and are intended to serve as a unified source for basic material in the CFD field as well as an introduction to more specialized topics in artificial viscosity and boundary conditions. Each chapter in the test is associated with a videotaped lecture. The basic properties of conservation laws, wave equations, and shock waves are described. The duality of the conservation law and wave representations is investigated, and shock waves are examined in some detail. Finite difference techniques are introduced for the solution of wave equations and conservation laws. Stability analysis for finite difference approximations are presented. A consistent description of artificial viscosity methods are provided. Finally, the problem of nonreflecting boundary conditions are treated.Document ID19870019781Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeOther - OtherAuthorsThompson, Kevin W.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1987Subject CategoryNumerical AnalysisReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-100010A-87291NAS 1.15:100010Accession Number87N29214Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 151-02-60-05Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870019781.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# C_2019129EN.01000101.xml

| 5.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2017-2018 SESSION

Sittings of 28 February and 1 March 2018

The Minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 336, 20.9.2018
  .

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
No. 54224.

#### Amer-Mex Import & Export Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 149014-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7924 ROBERT LEE BROCK, a/k/a Two Souls Walker, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PATRICIA H. KRUEGER, Chief Deputy Clerk of State Supreme Court, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 95-7937 ROBERT LEE BROCK, a/k/a Two Souls Walker, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusNURSE HARRISON, Indian Creek Correction Center; NURSE GO ODE, Indian Creek Correction Center, Defendants - Appellees.Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-95-332, CA-95-507-2)2 Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lee Brock, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. The district court assessed filing fees in accordance with Evans v. Croom , 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied , 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the cases without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee orders. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED3
No. 46271.

#### Protest 805651-G of W. X. Huber Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the vases in question are chiefly used in the kitchen or household or on the table for utilitarian purposes they were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed. Abstracts 29991, 35047, and 45722 followed.
Annual Statement as to Compliance
For the Period of January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016







COMM 2016-DC2







In accordance with Item 1123 of Regulation AB and with
the requirements detailed in §10.11 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) for the above-mentioned
CMBS pool, (the “CMBS Pool”), CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”), in its capacity as Special Servicer,
is providing this Officer’s Certificate with respect to the following:



| | (A) | a review of CWCAM’s activities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof (the
“Reporting Period”) and of CWCAM’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision
and;
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (B) | that, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled
all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate
to contact us.



Sincerely,

CWCapital Asset Management LLC



David B. Iannarone

President





































7501 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 500 West, Bethesda, MD 20814
www.cwcapital.com
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-3015 KEVIN F. CORADESCHI,

Petitioner,

v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Respondent. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in NY0752040163-A-1. Before DYK, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin C. Coradeschi submits correspondence notifying the court how he believes this case should proceed in light of the court's decision in Ramos v. Department of Justice, 2008-3093. The court considers whether the Department of Homeland Security should be directed to respond how it believes this case should proceed. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT: The Department of Homeland Security is directed to respond within 14 days of the date of filing of this order how it believes this petition for review should proceed.
FOR THE COURT 

# FEB 2 4 2009 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk IL ED US. COURT

FOF AP PEALS FO R THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT cc: Hililary A. Stern, Esq. Thomas G. Roth, Esq. FEB 2 4 2009

JAN HORBALY CLERK s20
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                           Quarter Ended                          Six Months Ended
                                               June 30,                               June 30,
                                   ------------------------------         ----------------------------
                                         1997              1996                1997               1996
                                         ----              ----                ----               ----

<S>                                    <C>                <C>                <C>                <C>    
Net Income ($000)                      $10,611            $18,139            $20,229            $76,642


Weighted Average Common
 Shares Outstanding                 69,287,739         68,960,257         69,264,468         69,034,603


Earnings Per Share                       $0.15              $0.26              $0.29              $1.11


Weighted Average Common
 Shares Outstanding
 Including Common Stock
 Equivalents - Primary Basis        69,661,028         69,462,050         69,585,214         69,472,760


Primary Earnings Per Share               $0.15              $0.26              $0.29              $1.10


Weighted Average Common
 Shares Outstanding
 Including Common Stock
 Equivalents - Fully
 Diluted Basis                      69,738,945         69,462,050         69,715,674         69,472,760


Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share         $0.15              $0.26              $0.29              $1.10

</TABLE>




<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 250 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 250

       Supporting the goals and ideals of Gold Star Mothers Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 22, 2005

Mr. Coburn (for himself, Mr. Allen, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Byrd, Mr. Crapo, 
   Mr. Graham, Mr. Hagel, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Levin, Ms. Murkowski, Ms. 
Snowe, Mr. Thune, Mr. Bunning, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Grassley, 
    Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Johnson, and Mr. 
Martinez) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Supporting the goals and ideals of Gold Star Mothers Day.

Whereas the American Gold Star Mothers have suffered the supreme sacrifice of 
        motherhood by losing sons and daughters who served in the Armed Forces, 
        and thus perpetuate the memory of all whose lives were sacrificed in our 
        wars;
Whereas the American Gold Star Mothers assist veterans of the Armed Forces and 
        their dependents in the presentation of claims to the Veterans' 
        Administration, and aid the men and women who served and died or were 
        wounded or incapacitated during hostilities;
Whereas the services rendered to the United States by the mothers of America 
        have strengthened and inspired our Nation throughout our history;
Whereas we honor ourselves and the mothers of America when we revere and 
        emphasize the role of the home and the family as the true foundations of 
        our Nation;
Whereas by doing so much for the home, the American mother is a source of moral 
        and spiritual guidance for the people of the United States and thus acts 
        as a positive force to promote good government and peace among all 
        mankind; and
Whereas September 25, 2005, is being recognized as Gold Star Mothers Day: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of Gold Star Mothers Day; 
        and
            (2) calls on the people of the United States to observe 
        such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
No. 48706.

#### Protest 96599-K of Ernest E. Marks Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

An examination of the record failed to disclose evidence, sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to .the collector’s, decision. The protest was overruled.
##### 



Exhibit 15

Letter Re: Unaudited Financial Information

Audit Committee of the
Board of Directors
TRW Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements and in the related prospectuses of our report dated
November 7, 2001 relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial
statements of TRW Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2001.

|         |  |  |           | 
|-------- |  |  | --------- | 
|Form S-3 |  |  | 333-89133 | 
|Form S-3 |  |  | 333-48443 | 
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-68242 | 
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-61198 | 
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-61192 | 
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-36052 | 
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-27003 | 
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-27001 | 
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-20351 | 
|Form S-8 |  |  | 33-53503  | 
|Form S-8 |  |  | 33-29751  | 
|Form S-8 |  |  | 2-90748   | 
|Form S-8 |  |  | 2-64035   | 

|                                
|--------------------------------
|                                
|/s/  Ernst & Young LLP          
|                                
|                                
|November 7, 2001
Cleveland, Ohio
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANNE M. ESKER,

Appellant,

v.

CLAY LANE RENTAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Nevada limited 

partnership, and GOZZO DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Florida corporation,

Appellees.

No. 4D19-3757

[April 8, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; G. Joseph Curley, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2005-CA011607-XXXX-MB.

Steven Ellison of Nelson Mullins Broad and Cassel, West Palm Beach, 

for appellant.

Michael A. Monteverde and Kali Lauren M. Sinclair of Zinober, Diana & 

Monteverde, P.A., for appellee Gozzo Development, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., GROSS and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2008318EN.01S00301.xml

| 12.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided to no longer quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v JASPER B. PERRY, Corporal, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

18 USCMA 574, 40 CMR 286

*575No. 21,948

September 19, 1969

*Commander E. M. Fulton, Jr.,*JAGC, USN, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Anthony A. Derezinski,*for Appellee, United States. JAGC, USNR, was on the pleadings

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

The inquiry into the providence of accused’s plea of guilty to the offenses charged is comparable to that found in United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247. In this regard, the record reflects no reversible error. The procedure followed in this case, however, would not meet the standard that must apply to cases tried thirty days after the decision in *Care.*

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

FeRguson, Judge:

I concur in the result. See my dissent in United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Bruce M. Zorich, Chief Executive Officer of United Components, Inc. certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Components, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which the report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Date: May 11, 2005      By: /s/ Bruce M. Zorich     Name: Bruce M. Zorich Title: Chief Executive Officer
OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

204) ll-K-(I)-17 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

p.i 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:55 AM Sheet 204 of 325 
P.2 

II-K-(I)-17 

ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING THE POWERPLANT AND INDUSTRIAL 

FUEL USE ACT. 

U.S. Department of Energy. Publication No. 

DOE/EIA-0102/21. 

November 1978. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(I)-17
5]0000m.£. * 30°

BATHYMETRIC MAP

BEAUFORT SEA °
HARRISON BAY NORTH

agoo00me, 150°

TT 990|72°

7980000.

73g0000m.N

8

DEASE INLET) NR 5-1

7830000m.1)

78900000.N),

Base map information including bathymetry was compiled by the National
Ocean Service (NOS). Bathymetry was compiled from’ NOS hydrographic
surveys supplemented by hydrographic information from other sources
(see index). NOS hydrographic survey data complies with International
Hydrographic Organization (IHO) Publication 44 accuracy standards or
those used at the date of the surveys. This is a reproduction of a facsimile
of the bathymetric manuscript and does not necessarily represent the final
publication. This information is not intended for navigational purposes.
Bathymetric Contour Intervals: 10 meters to 200 meter depth, supplemented
by 2 meter intervals, thence 50 meters to maximum depth.
Datum: Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW).
Universal Transverse Mercator Grid. Zone 5; 10,000 meter ticks (--) are
shown inside the neatline.
Protraction Diagram data shown in a subdued (screened) black was com-
piled by the Minerals Management Service (MMS).
THIS MAP IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal leasing purposes; for
such purposes use the MMS Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction
Diagrams.

Heavy lines(s) indicate limits of these protraction diagrams.

HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMATION

suRVEY
suRVEY suRvey suRvEY LINE SPACING
NUMBER DATE SCALE (NAUT. MILES)

H.7922 1951-53, 1:40,000 04.2.5

OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MAP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATIO

NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE :
1986

Produced at Washington, D.C.
for

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE

TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION
Scale 1:250,000
10

° 5 15 20 Statute Miles
= = =
5 ° 5 10 15 20 26 30 Kilometers
SoS =
° 5 10 15 Nautical Miles
i = J

HARRISON BAY NORTH
WEG SELRAE Sex ase, ~NOS NR 5-2 (OCS)

153°
72° 728
INDEX TO
156° ADJOINING SHEETS 147°
734-— 73°
Supplementary Data | 5
aerow | canapa | CANADA
CANYON BASIN ‘BASIN
NS's? | West | Sey
| NS 5-8
ister. J P8GRVO" |“ poiny
ea
Ng's | NR et
H-7922
agison
ny °
Tesuexeux | we s-a | SEECHEY
. pee] SS ae
153° Photographic copies of the above and prior surveys 150° 9 tho:
may be obtained, at the cost of reproduction, by aser 1 4708

addressing the ‘Director (N/CG243), National
‘Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY 

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE 

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498 

 OFFICE OF 

 AIR AND RADIATION 

August 17, 2012 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meetings with Daimler regarding the EPA/NHTSA Joint Proposed Rulemaking for 

Greenhouse Gas and CAFE Standards for Model Year 2017-2025 Light-Duty Vehicles 

FROM: William Charmley, US EPA 

 

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799 

This memo documents three meeting between representatives of Daimler and EPA to discuss the 

EPA/NHTSA Joint Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Greenhouse Gas and CAFE Standards 

for Model Year 2017-2025 Light-Duty Vehicles. 

January 9, 2012 Meeting

This meeting was held at Daimler’s meeting rooms at the Detroit Auto Show in Detroit, 

Michigan. 

Representatives from Daimler included Thomas Weber, Jake Jones, and Bill Craven. 

Representatives from EPA included Margo Oge and Chet France. 

The discussion topics were focused on the level of stringency for the proposed GHG standards 

and Daimler participants discussed with EPA their technical concerns with the stringency of the 

proposal, in particular the stringency of the proposed passenger car standards. 

Daimler stated that they would submit detailed comments regarding their issues and 

recommendations to the public docket for the proposed rulemaking. 
January 11, 2012 Meeting

This meeting was held at EPA’s offices in Washington, DC on January 11, 2012 

Representatives from Daimler included Walter Putz, Jake Jones, Peter Oberlander, and Bill 

Craven. Daimler was also represented by Jackie Glassman, counsel to Damiler from Hogan and 

Hartson. 

Representatives from EPA included Margo Oge, Chet France, and Bill Charmley. 

The discussion topics focused on the level of stringency for the proposed GHG standards and the 

flexibilities and incentives proposed in the NPRM. Daimler representatives provided EPA with a 

confidential presentation during the meeting which contained the topics they wanted to discuss. 

They also stated the company would provide additional written comments on the proposal in 

February of 2012. 

April 24, 2012 Meeting

This meeting was held at Daimler’s offices in Stuggart, Germany. Representatives from Daimler 

included Bernard Heil, Manfred Schucker, Jan Kruger, Peter Liker, Walter Peutz, Peter 

Oberlander, Klaus Land, and Roland Kemmler. 

Representatives from EPA included Margo Oge, Chet France, Bill Charmley, and Matt Spears. 

Daimler provided a detailed technical updated on the companies future vehicle product plans. 

The majority of this information included confidential business information. The general topic 

areas included the topics of mass reduction, diesel engine technology, lean-burn gasoline 

technology. Daimler also discussed the mid-term review which was included in the NPRM, and 

the company reiterated their support for a mid-term review, consistent with their written 

comments on the NPRM.