alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 319/7 De

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 319 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 487 December 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 319

English edition

Legislation

Volume 487 December 2005

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1985/2005 of 6 December 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1986/2005 of 6 December 2005 on the opening of tariff quotas applicable to the importation into the Community of certain processed agricultural products originating in Romania and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2244/2004 | 3 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1985/2005 of 6 December 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1986/2005 of 6 December 2005 on the opening of tariff quotas applicable to the importation into the Community of certain processed agricultural products originating in Romania and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2244/2004

3

| | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission |
| | * | Commission Decision of 2 December 2005 amending Decision 2005/62/EC as regards the extension of the transitional period for Cyprus
  (notified under document number C(2005) 4630) | 7 |
| | * | Commission Decision of 6 December 2005 recognising Bulgaria as being free from Clavibacter michiganensis (Smith) Davis et al. ssp. sepedonicus (Spieckerman and Kotthoff) Davis et al.
  (notified under document number C(2005) 4722) | 9 |

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

Commission

*

Commission Decision of 2 December 2005 amending Decision 2005/62/EC as regards the extension of the transitional period for Cyprus
  (notified under document number C(2005) 4630)

(notified under document number C(2005) 4630)

7

*

Commission Decision of 6 December 2005 recognising Bulgaria as being free from Clavibacter michiganensis (Smith) Davis et al. ssp. sepedonicus (Spieckerman and Kotthoff) Davis et al.
  (notified under document number C(2005) 4722)

Clavibacter michiganensis

et al

sepedonicus

et al

(notified under document number C(2005) 4722)

9

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 357 

Designating January 2006 as ‘‘National Mentoring Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 27, 2006 

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mrs. DOLE, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. 

DEWINE, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. COCHRAN, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. DAYTON, Mr. 

DURBIN, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LEVIN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. CARPER, 

Mr. FEINGOLD, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. 

KERRY, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. ALLEN, Mrs. 

BOXER, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. TALENT, and Mr. DODD) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating January 2006 as ‘‘National Mentoring Month’’. 

Whereas youth mentoring is a centuries-old concept, through 

which an adult provides guidance, support, and encouragement to help a young person become a responsible 

and productive adult; 

Whereas mentoring, when done well, helps young people stay 

in school and improve academically, boosts self-esteem 

and communication skills, and improves the chances of 

going on to higher education; 

Whereas there are thousands of mentoring programs in communities of all sizes across the United States, focused on 
2 

•SRES 357 IS

building strong and effective relationships between caring 

adults and young people who need positive adult role 

models; 

Whereas in spite of the great benefits mentoring provides, the 

United States has a serious mentoring gap, with more 

than 15,000,000 young people currently in need of caring 

adult role models; 

Whereas the demand for mentoring far exceeds the current 

capacity of local mentoring programs and the number of 

adults who currently volunteer as mentors; 

Whereas recent research conducted as part of the National 

Conversation on Mentoring—Take II points to the need 

to generate significantly larger numbers of volunteer 

mentors as one of the most critical issues facing mentoring; 

Whereas the designation of January 2006 as National Mentoring Month will focus the Nation’s attention on the essential role mentoring plays in the lives of young people; 

Whereas the month-long celebration of mentoring will encourage more organizations, including schools, businesses, 

nonprofit organizations, faith institutions, foundations, 

and individuals to become engaged in mentoring; and 

Whereas National Mentoring Month will, most importantly, 

build awareness of mentoring and recruit more individuals to become mentors, helping close the Nation’s mentoring gap: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) proclaims the month of January 2006 as 

3 the fifth annual ‘‘National Mentoring Month’’; 
3 

•SRES 357 IS

1 (2) recognizes that the President has issued a 

2 proclamation calling upon the people of the United 

3 States and interested groups to observe the month 

4 with appropriate ceremonies and activities that pro5 mote awareness of and volunteer involvement with 

6 youth mentoring; and 

7 (3) recognizes with gratitude the contributions 

8 of the millions of caring adults who are already serv9 ing as mentors and encourages more adults to volun10 teer as mentors. 

Æ
Case No. 15,203.

#### UNITED STATES v. The GERTRUDE.

[See Case No. 5.369.]
Reap. Dec. 8968.

#### *Elliot Import Corp.*v. *United States.*

Entered at New York, N. Y. [Not published.] Motion by plaintiff.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

  

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2015, byand among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, C-III ASSET MANAGEMENTLLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asCertificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trusteeand PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset RepresentationsReviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2015-P2 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) , and of its performance per the Agreementduring such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of itsobligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
Case: 2:12-cv-01079-EAS-EPD Doc #: 5 Filed: 11/27/12 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T10:08:05-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

RON H. GANYON,

Plaintiff,

 Civil Action 2:12-cv-420

v. Judge Algenon L. Marbley

 Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant. 

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the January 23, 2013 Report and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers, to whom

this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). (ECF No. 18.) The Magistrate Judge

recommended that the Court grant Plaintiff’s Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees and Costs

Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act and award attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of

$2,946.42. 

The Report and Recommendation specifically advises the parites that the failure to object

to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of the Report results in a “waiver of the

right to de novo review . . . by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment

of the District Court.” (Report and Recommendation 3, ECF No. 18.) The time period for filing

objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. The Commissioner has not objected

to the Report and Recommendation. 

Case: 2:12-cv-00420-ALM-EPD Doc #: 19 Filed: 02/25/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation. Noting that no objections

have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the

Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees

and Costs Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act is GRANTED. (ECF No. 420.) 

Accordingly, Plaintiff is AWARDED attorneys fees’ and costs pursuant to the Equal Access to

Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, in the amount of $2,946.42. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Algenon L. Marbley 

 ALGENON L. MARBLEY

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DATED: February 25, 2013

2

Case: 2:12-cv-00420-ALM-EPD Doc #: 19 Filed: 02/25/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 20 13 - 0734 Directorate ID : 20 12 - SW - 080 - AD Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Model 222, 222B, 222U, 230, and 430 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operato rs): 146 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to detect pitting or penetration of the base metal of the piston rod that could lead to the piston rod’s failure, the servo actuator’s failure, and the loss of helicopter control. Cost:

 In specting the servo actuators would require 4 work- hours for a labor cost of $340 . No parts would be needed for a total cost of $1,020 per helicopter, and $ 1 4 8 , 920 for the U.S. fleet given 3 actuators per helicopter .  Overhauling the serv o actuators would require 8 work- hours for a labor cost of $680. Parts would cost $11,900 for a total cost of $12,580 per helicopter.

 Replacing the servo actuators would require 8 work- hours for a labor cost of $680. Parts would cost $35,700 for a total co st of $36,380 per helicopter.

Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  )2

Project Engineer : Matt Wilbanks
February 19, 1943

No. 48047.

#### Protests 914813-G, etc., of S. Nathan & Co., Inc.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Thomas
Brandt, Executive Vice President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Trans-Lux
Corporation, do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

    (1) The Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

    This Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not
be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Registrant or
the certifying officer.



                                       /s/ Thomas Brandt
                                       -----------------------------
Date:  November 14, 2007               Thomas Brandt
                                       Executive Vice President and
                                       Co-Chief Executive Officer
(Reap. Dec. 9355)

#### Plywood *&*Door Northern Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 906238, etc.

(Decided March 19, 1959)

*James Wilson Young*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran*Doub, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule *“A,”*attached hereto, were submitted for decision upon a stipulation of counsel for the parties upon the basis of which I find foreign value, as defined in section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the plywood involved, which was exported from Pinland in the years 1957 and 1958, and that such value is the appraised value, less 10 per centum, net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v HAROLD SILVER, Major, U. S. Army, Appellant

16 USCMA 611, 37 CMR 231

No. 19,941

April 7, 1967

*Colonel Daniel T. Ghent, Lieutenant Colonel Martin S. Drucker,*and *Captain Frank J. Martin, Jr.,*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel David Rarick*and *Captain Salvatore A. Romano*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

A general court-martial convened in South Vietnam convicted the accused of destroying a Government tent through neglect,1 and of wrongfully making a known false statement under oath, in violation of Articles 108 and 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 908 and 933, respectively. It sentenced him to be dismissed from the service. On review, a board of review set aside the latter offense, and reduced the sentence to a reprimand and forfeiture of $250.00 per month for six months.

Between the time of the board of review’s decision and the accused’s petition for grant of review, this Court decided United States v Robbins, 16 USCMA 474, 475, 37 CMR 94. We held it is error to instruct a court-martial that if it believes a witness has testified falsely to a material fact it can “ ‘disregard his testimony in whole or in part, except insofar as it may have been corroborated by other credible evidence.’ ” Substantially, the same instruction was given in this case. Reversal is, therefore, required.

The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the findings of guilty and sentence are set aside. A rehearing may be ordered.

1

 The theory of the Government was that the tent was enveloped by flames from a gasoline fire started by the accused to destroy an infestation of ants in the mat flooring of the tent.
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

DAVID N. DUNLAP, II and

SANDRA A. DUNLAP,

Plaintiffs,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, CASE NO. C2-11-0589

JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

Defendant. MAGISTRATE JUDGE E.A. PRESTON DEAVERS

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or

trial.

Pursuant to the ORDER filed December 2, 2011, JUDGMENT is hereby entered

DISMISSING this case.

Date: December 2, 2011 JAMES BONINI, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:11-cv-00589-EAS-EPD Doc #: 9 Filed: 12/02/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,984
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,775
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,484
<PP&E>                                         166,242
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,927
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,049,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          673,781
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,733
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,361,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,049,707
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,315
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,371,961
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             180,701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,541,347)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,541,347)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Tank Car Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark J. Garrette, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In witness whereof, I have executed this certification as of the 10thday of November, 2008.



/s/ Mark J. GarretteMark J. GarrettePrincipal Financial Officer
Phantom Pre-Flight Check List

Earth Forensics, Inc. 12532 Vista Panorama, North Tustin, California 92705 www. ea rth f or ens i cs . c om

Project Information

Date: Project: Weather:

PIC: Location: Visibility:

VO:

Flight Time Start

Flight Time End:

Flight Plan (Office)

Check Flight Plan on Topo

Airport not <5NM

Check Google Street View and Pictometry birds eye view photography for possible obstructions

Check weather forecast

Battery for UAS fully charged

Battery for Communication system between PIC and VO fully charged

Firmware up to date

Preflight

No People or animals close by

No Adverse Weather (wind, rain, snow)

No power lines or large buildings

Inspect propellers, gimbal, camera, landing gear, and remote control

Remove lens cap and gimbal clamp

Check remote control, Wi-Fi extender, phantom, prop guards, and mobile device power

Calibrate compass.

GPS signal (minimum 7)

Observer in place

Notes
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ASCENCION-CASTRO, AKA Jose 

Acesion-Castro, AKA Christian Ronald 

Clegg, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 19-71400 

Agency No. A202-014-952 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Jose Ascencion-Castro, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to remand 

and his motion to terminate, and dismissing his appeal from an immigration 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-71400 

judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his motion for a continuance. We have jurisdiction 

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to 

continue, Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir. 2008), the 

denial of a motion to remand, Movsisian v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1095, 1098 (9th Cir. 

2005), and the denial of a motion to terminate, Dominguez v. Barr, 975 F.3d 725, 

734 (9th Cir. 2020). We deny the petition for review.

The IJ did not abuse its discretion in denying Ascencion-Castro’s motion for 

a continuance. See Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d at 1247 (denial of continuance was 

not an abuse of discretion where the record did not establish petitioner’s present 

eligibility for relief); see also Matter of Sanchez Sosa, 25 I. & N. Dec. 807, 812-15 

(BIA 2012) (discussing how a movant may establish prima facie eligibility for a U 

visa such that good cause for a continuance might be established). 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Ascencion-Castro’s motion 

to remand where Ascencion-Castro may pursue a U visa with a removal order in 

place. See 8 C.F.R. § 214.14(c)(1)(ii). 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying administrative closure. See 

Gonzalez-Caraveo v. Sessions, 882 F.3d 885, 891-93 (9th Cir. 2018) (holding the 

non-exhaustive list of factors in Matter of Avetisyan, 25 I. & N. Dec. 688 (BIA 

2012), provides a standard for reviewing administrative closure decisions).
3 19-71400 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to terminate, 

where Ascencion-Castro’s contentions regarding his notice to appear are 

foreclosed by Aguilar Fermin v. Barr, 958 F.3d 887, 895 (9th Cir. 2020) (“the lack 

of time, date, and place in the NTA sent to [petitioner] did not deprive the 

immigration court of jurisdiction over her case”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.