1 The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-3917

___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * Kelvin Miller, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Defendant - Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 25, 2009 Filed: December 7, 2009

___________ Before MURPHY, BRIGHT, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Kelvin Miller appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) on the grounds that: (1) there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction; (2) the district court 1 improperly applied sentence enhancements under the United States Sent encing Guidelines (“USSG”) §§ 3C1.1 and 3C1.2; (3) the district court erred in denying his motion for a downward departure or variance; and (4) the district court faile d to adequately consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. We affirm.-2- After viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, see United States v. Urick , 431 F.3d 300, 303 (8th Cir. 2005), we conclude the evidence is sufficient to show Miller possessed a firearm. Two police officers testified they observed Miller carrying a weapon as heran through a St. Louis residential neighborhood. One of the officers testified that Miller pointed that weapon at him during the chase. An officer also testifie d that after Miller was arrested, he admitted to throwing this weapon in a nearby backyard. Officers subsequently found the weapon in that location. This evidence is sufficient to sustain Miller’s conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm.
We also conclude the district court pr operly imposed an obstruction of justice enhancement under USSG § 3C1. 1 based on Miller’s repeated denials at trial that he possessed a weapon. See United States v. Flores , 362 F.3d 1030, 1037 (8th Cir. 2004) (“Committing perjury at trial constitutes an obstruction of justice within the meaning of § 3C1.1.”). The record also indicat es that the district court applied the enhancement only after conducting its own i ndependent evaluation of all the evidence. See United States v. Kessler , 321 F.3d 699, 703 (8th Cir. 2003). That evidence strongly showed that Miller lied while on th e witness stand when he denied possessing the weapon, and the district court di d not err in enhancing his sentence.
Similarly, evidence supports the district court’s imposition of a sentence enhancement for creating a risk of death or injury during flight under USSG § 3C1.2. Miller admitted he fled from police, jump ed out of a moving vehicle which later struck a parked car, led police officer s on a foot chase through a residential neighborhood, and persistently disregarded officers’ commands to stop. The record also shows that Miller carri ed a loaded weapon during th e chase and pointed it at a police officer, which resulted in the officershooting Miller. This factual background justifies the enhancement for reckless endangerment under USSG§ 3C1.2. See United States v. Bates , 561 F.3d 754, 757 (8th Cir. 2009).-3- The district court also did not err in denying Miller’s request for a downward departure from the guideline sentence based on Miller’s claims of diminished capacity and mental health problems. After review ing the sentencing record, it is evident that the district court considered Miller’s request, but concluded the guideline sentence was appropriate and Miller ha d not established his case was sufficiently atypical to warrant a lesser sentence. See United States v. Lee , 553 F.3d 598, 601 (8th Cir. 2009).
Finally, the district court did not err in imposing a guideline sentence rather than one pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). We have carefully reviewed the record and conclude the district court properly consid ered the § 3553(a) factors and did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Miller to 96 months’ imprisonment.
Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________