alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 2:12-cv-00722-EAS-MRA Doc #: 32 Filed: 10/23/12 Page: 1 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00722-EAS-MRA Doc #: 32 Filed: 10/23/12 Page: 2 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00722-EAS-MRA Doc #: 32 Filed: 10/23/12 Page: 3 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00722-EAS-MRA Doc #: 32 Filed: 10/23/12 Page: 4 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00722-EAS-MRA Doc #: 32 Filed: 10/23/12 Page: 5 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00722-EAS-MRA Doc #: 32 Filed: 10/23/12 Page: 6 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00722-EAS-MRA Doc #: 32 Filed: 10/23/12 Page: 7 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00722-EAS-MRA Doc #: 32 Filed: 10/23/12 Page: 8 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00722-EAS-MRA Doc #: 32 Filed: 10/23/12 Page: 9 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00722-EAS-MRA Doc #: 32 Filed: 10/23/12 Page: 10 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00722-EAS-MRA Doc #: 32 Filed: 10/23/12 Page: 11 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00722-EAS-MRA Doc #: 32 Filed: 10/23/12 Page: 12 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00722-EAS-MRA Doc #: 32 Filed: 10/23/12 Page: 13 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T14:14:24-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 73 (Tuesday, April 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7245]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel ``Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research 
Centers: Special Interest Project Competitive Supplements (Panel 8),'' 
Request for Application Number (RFA) DP07-002

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces a meeting of the aforementioned Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Time and Date: 12 p.m.-4 p.m., June 12, 2007 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and 
the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services 
Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of research grant applications in response 
to RFA DP07-002, ``Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research 
Centers: Special Interest Project Competitive Supplements (Panel 8).''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maurine Goodman, M.A., M.P.H., 
Scientific Review Administrator, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., MS D72, Atlanta, GA 30333, 
telephone 404-639-4737.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: April 10, 2007.
Elaine L. Baker,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
 [FR Doc. E7-7245 Filed 4-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 36

_____________________________
T ITUS D ICKEY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Robert E. Long , Judge

. July 22, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , M AKAR , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Titus Dickey, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Tabitha Herrera , Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

ALEXANDER GREYBULL,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 19

- 30073

D.C. No. 1:18

- cr

- 00020

- SPW

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 15, 2019 **

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Alexander Greybull appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 1 8 0

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea convictions

for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violati on of

21 U.S.C. § 846 ; possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

exce pt as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

OCT 23 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 30073

cocaine , in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) ; possession of a firearm during a drug

trafficking offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) ; and being a felon in

possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)

.

Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Greybull ’ s counsel has filed

a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

as counsel of record. W e have provided Greybull the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
----

Corrigendum to notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/21-22/05 to constitute a reserve of heads of unit (A*9 and A*12) of Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene and Slovak citizenship in the following fields: internal market, external relations, management of research programmes, management of the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund, management of sustainable resources

(Official Journal of the European Union C 135 A of 2 June 2005)

(2005/C 172 A/01)

On page 17, heading C, point 1, footnote 7:

for:

‘No later than 12.00 noon, Brussels time, on 7 July 2005’,

read:

‘No later than 12.00 noon, Brussels time, on 28 July 2005’;

on page 18, heading C, point 1:

for:

‘The closing date for inscription is 7 July 2005. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time on that day’,

read:

‘The closing date for inscription is 28 July 2005. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time on that day’.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9354 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9354

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make certain temporary 
  provisions relating to the child tax credit permanent, to make such 
    credit fully refundable, and to increase the corporate tax rate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 13, 2024

Ms. Porter (for herself, Ms. Pressley, and Mrs. Ramirez) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make certain temporary 
  provisions relating to the child tax credit permanent, to make such 
    credit fully refundable, and to increase the corporate tax rate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Single Parent Penalty Elimination 
Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN CHILD TAX CREDIT.

    (a) Amount of Credit Increased.--Section 24(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``$1,000'' and inserting 
``$2,000''.
    (b) Repeal of Limitations.--Section 24 of such Code is amended by 
striking subsection (b).
    (c) Credit Made Fully Refundable.--Section 24(d) of such Code is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(d) Credit Refundable.--So much of the credit allowed to a 
taxpayer under subsection (a) as is determined without regard to 
subsection (h) shall be treated as a credit allowed to such taxpayer 
under subpart C.''.
    (d) Repeal on Certain Special Rules for Taxable Years 2018 Through 
2025.--Section 24(h) of such Code is amended by striking paragraphs 
(2), (3), (5), and (6).
    (e) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2023.

SEC. 3. INCREASE IN CORPORATE TAX RATE.

    (a) In General.--Section 11(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by striking ``21 percent'' and inserting ``28 percent''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.
                                 <all>
```
No. 45149.

#### Protests 972456-G, etc., of Barbara Costume Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 24 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 1 of 19  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 24 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 2 of 19  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 24 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 3 of 19  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 24 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 4 of 19  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 24 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 5 of 19  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 24 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 6 of 19  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 24 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 7 of 19  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 24 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 8 of 19  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 24 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 9 of 19  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 24 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 10 of 19  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 24 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 11 of 19  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 24 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 12 of 19  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 24 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 13 of 19  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 24 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 14 of 19  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 24 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 15 of 19  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 24 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 16 of 19  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 24 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 17 of 19  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 24 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 18 of 19  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 24 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 19 of 19  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T17:58:40-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

KEVIN D. DARRAH,

Plaintiff,

vs. Civil Action 2:12-cv-899 

 Judge Smith

Magistrate Judge King

DR. KRISHER, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

 On September 28, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge issued

a Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 4, recommending that defendants

Gary C. Mohr, Gary Croft, John DesMarais, Stuart Hudson, Robert Welch,

Mona Parks, Rod B. Johnson, Jondrea Parrish, Ralph Wilson, Donald

Root, Darhla Roberts, K. Layne and D. McGonigal be dismissed for

failure to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties were

specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and

Recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so. 

There has nevertheless been no objection to the Report and

Recommendation.

The Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.

The United States Marshal Service is DIRECTED to effect service of

process, by certified mail, on Dr. Krisher, Dr. Andrew Eddy, Dr. David

C. Weil and Karen Stanforth,1 who shall have forty-five (45) days after

1

The Report and Recommendation, which separated the claims of plaintiff

Robert A. Snead and the instant plaintiff, Kevin D. Darrah, concluded that

plaintiff Darrah’s allegations were sufficient to state Eighth Amendment

Case: 2:12-cv-00899-GCS-NMK Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/22/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
service of process to respond to the Complaint.

 s/George C. Smith 

 George C. Smith, Judge

 United States District Court

claims against these four defendants. Id. at 8-10. 

2

Case: 2:12-cv-00899-GCS-NMK Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/22/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 32








                          UNISOURCE ENERGY CORPORATION


                         TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY

                             _____________________


                        STATEMENTS OF CORPORATE OFFICERS
          (Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

                             _____________________

         Each of the undersigned, James S. Pignatelli, Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer of UniSource Energy Corporation and Tucson
Electric Power Company (each a "Company"), and Kevin P. Larson, Vice President,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of each Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that each Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained therein fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
such Company.



August 24, 2004

                                              /s/  James S. Pignatelli
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                                   James S. Pignatelli
                                            Chairman of the Board, President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                              UniSource Energy Corporation
                                             Tucson Electric Power Company


                                             /s/   Kevin P. Larson
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                                   Kevin P. Larson
                                             Vice President, Treasurer and
                                               Chief Financial Officer
                                             UniSource Energy Corporation
                                            Tucson Electric Power Company
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2009-0162 SNPRM

Directorate ID: 2004-NE-19-AD

Originating Office Tracking No.: SP1502EN-E

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: other

If other, explain: Concur with SNPRM as written

Commenter(s): The Boeing Company

What change to the AD action is requested? None

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? N/A

Do we agree? Yes

If YES, we agree because N/A Make the following changes to the AD: None

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:

If NO, we don’t agree because 
Page 2 of 3

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: SP1502EN-E

ASE Date

Branch Manager Date
Case No. 13,306.

#### STAR *et*al. v. The WHITE CLOUD.

[N. Y. Times.

April 3, 1858.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

1858.

Pleading in Admiralty — Collision.

This libel was filed by Jesse W. Star and others, the owners of the brig Topaz, to recover the damages sustained by her by a collision with the schooner off Barnegat. on the night of October 14.1855. The evidence as to the facts was contradictory and irreconcilable.

Beebe. Dean & Donohue, for libelants.

Burrill, Davison & Burrill, for claimants.

HELD BY

THE COURT

(HALL, District Judge):

That the pleadings on both sides are in violation of all sound principles of pleading in maritime cases, and of the positive rules of. the supreme court, neither party stating the course or bearings of the vessels, the direction of the wind, the state of the weather, the position of the vessels in respect to each other, or the land or the mode of their navigation at the time. That it is not fit in a case which may pass through all the gradations of a hostile litigation to leave it open to be shaped and varied as it progresses according to its necessities or the election of those who conduct it. That the pleadings contain no allegation of the facts in controversy and none which can be made a legal ground of acquittal or condemnation of the vessel under arrest, and the cause is therefore temporarily placed on the calendar for hearing.

THE- COURT allows the parties to put in proper pleadings now, and submit the case on them' and the proofs already in, for decision without further argument. If this proposal is not agreed to, then the libel is dismissed. or if accepted by the libelant, and not by the claimants, decree for the libelants pro confesso.
Skip to main content    

## Main navigation

-  About    -  Mission 
  -  Strategic Plan 
  -  Board 
  -  Policy 
  -  Jobs 
  -  Visit Us 
  -  Donate 
  -  Contact Us 
-  Grants    -  Grant Programs 
  -  Apply for a Grant 
  -  Manage Your Award 
  -  Search Awarded Grants  
  -  Peer Review 
-  Our Work    -  Priority Areas 
  -  Publications 
  -  National Medals 
  -  Partnerships 
  -  Grant Spotlights 
-  Data    -  Research & Evaluation 
  -   Data Catalog 
  -  Library Search & Compare 
  -  About the Numbers 
-  News    -  News Releases 
  -  Blog 
  -  Events 
  -  Webinars 
  -  COVID-19 Updates 
  -  Subscribe
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made
to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2016, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING
CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC
BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor
and Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM 2016-CCRE28 (the "Agreement").
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.11
of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer
during the period from February 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance
per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.







Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 
Wells Fargo Bank

























Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.