alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC SPARENTAL, LLC, d/b/a/MSI AVIATION, Complainant, 

### v. SOMERSET- PULASKI COUNTY AIRPORT BOARD, Respondent. FAA Docket 

### No. 16-13-02

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based onthe abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted AirportEnforcementProceedings, 14 CPR Part 16. Pursuantto 14 CPR Part 16, subpart B, the date by whichthe Director'sDetermination will be issued inthis matter is hereby extended to February 18, 2015. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case.

Randall S. Fiertz Director, Airport Compliance and Management Analysis DateCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on



### DecemberS~2014, I caused to be placedin the United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe Notice ofExtension ofTime to February 18, 2015 for FAA DocketNo. 16-13-02 addressed to: Counsel for Complainant: Konrad Kuczak 130 West Second Street, Suite 1010 Dayton, OH 45402 Counsel for Respondent: Rachel Owsley Bethany 

### A. Breetz Stites & Harbison, PLLC 400 West Market Street, Suite 1800 Louisville, KY 40202 Hand delivered to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-100



# ~fGA---/

Claudia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

JAMES D. WILHELM, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. Civil Action 2:12-cv-752 

 Judge Marbley 

 Magistrate Judge King 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

 Defendant. 

ORDER 

 On January 23, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge 

recommended that plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, Doc. No. 16, be granted 

and that this case be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security, 

pursuant to Sentence 6 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for consideration of new 

and material evidence. Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 17. 

Although the parties were advised of their right to object to the 

recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so, 

there has been no objection. 

 The Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 17, is ADOPTED AND 

AFFIRMED. Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, Doc. No. 16, is GRANTED. 

This action is REMANDED to the Commissioner, pursuant to Sentence 6 of 

42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for consideration of new and material evidence. 

 s/Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley 

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:12-cv-00752-ALM-NMK Doc #: 18 Filed: 02/20/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-5285

_____________________________

CHRISTOPHER E. MORRIS,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

January 16, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Christopher E. Morris, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth Steely, General Counsel, and Gayla Grant, Assistant 

General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, 

Tallahassee, for Respondent.
No. 53159.

#### K. Iguchi *v.*United States,

protests 836382-G and 871748-G (Providence).

*319Opinion by

Cline, J.

When this case was called for trial counsel for the Government moved to dismiss the case for failure to prosecute. An examination of the record failing to disclose evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s decision, the protests were overruled.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

R & D FILM 1, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

 Civil Action 2:12-cv-1138

v. Judge Michael H. Watson

 Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers

DOES 402-413,

Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

 Plaintiff filed its Complaint in this action on December 11, 2012. On July 12, 2013, the

Court ordered Plaintiff to amend its Complaint within thirty days to substitute in the real names

for its Doe Defendants and to perfect service on those named partes as required under Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or to alternatively show cause why the Court should not dismiss

this action pursuant to Rule 4(m). (ECF No. 6.) To date, Plaintiff has not moved to amend its

Complaint to substitute in the real names for its Doe Defendants. Nor has Plaintiff responded to

the Court’s Show Cause Order. It is therefore RECOMMENDED that the Court dismiss this

action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to timely effect service of process. 

PROCEDURE ON OBJECTIONS

If any party seeks review by the District Judge of this Report and Recommendation, that

party may, within fourteen (14) days, file and serve on all parties objections to the Report and

Recommendation, specifically designating this Report and Recommendation, and the part in

question, as well as the basis for objection. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

Case: 2:12-cv-01138-MHW-EPD Doc #: 7 Filed: 08/21/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Response to objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

The parties are specifically advised that the failure to object to the Report and

Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and

waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court. See, e.g., Pfahler v. Nat’l Latex

Prod. Co., 517 F.3d 816, 829 (6th Cir. 2007) (holding that “failure to object to the magistrate

judge’s recommendations constituted a waiver of [the defendant’s] ability to appeal the district

court’s ruling”); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005) (holding that

defendant waived appeal of district court’s denial of pretrial motion by failing to timely object to

magistrate judge’s report and recommendation). Even when timely objections are filed,

appellate review of issues not raised in those objections is waived. Robert v. Tesson, 507 F.3d

981, 994 (6th Cir. 2007) (“[A] general objection to a magistrate judge’s report, which fails to

specify the issues of contention, does not suffice to preserve an issue for appeal . . . .”) (citation

omitted)).

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: August 21,2013 /s/ Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers 

 Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers

 United States Magistrate Judge 

2

Case: 2:12-cv-01138-MHW-EPD Doc #: 7 Filed: 08/21/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case No. 8,030.

#### LAMBSON v. BOILEAU.

[Cited in Westbrook v. Romeyn, Case No. 17,-428. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 76 (Friday, April 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19933-19934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7506]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research 
Centers, Special Interest Project Competitive Supplements (Panels 9-
11), Request for Applications (RFA) DP07-002

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting.

    Time and Date: 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m., June 18, 2007 (Closed).
    Place: Doubletree Buckhead, 3342 Peachtree Road NE, Atlanta, GA 
30326, telephone 404-321-1234.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of ``Health Promotion and Disease 
Prevention Research Centers, Special Interest Project Competitive 
Supplements (Panels 9-11),'' RFA DP07-002.
    Contact Person for More Information: Juliana Cyril, M.P.H., PhD, 
Scientific Review Administrator, Office of the Chief Science 
Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE., Mailstop D74, Atlanta, GA 
30333, Telephone 404-639-4639.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for

[[Page 19934]]

both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Elaine L. Baker,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E7-7506 Filed 4-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6012
DARROL HARRISON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DENNIS FLOYD, Special Drug Enforcement Agent; JOHNNY DANIELS, Special Drug Enforcement Agent; JOHN DOE #I, Director of the Drug Enforcement Agents, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Robert S. Carr, Magistrate Judge. (CA-94-3004-2-18AJ) Submitted: November 28, 1995 Decided: January 5, 1996 Before HALL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darrol Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's report and recommendation in his Bivens* action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.§ 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
PUBLIC LAW 104–233—OCT. 2, 1996 110 STAT. 3057

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1834:

SENATE REPORTS: No. 104–338 (Comm. on Indian Affairs).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

Aug. 2, considered and passed Senate.

Sept. 25, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 104–233

104th Congress

An Act

To reauthorize the Indian Environmental General Assistance Program Act of 1992,

and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION.

Section 502(h) of the Indian Environmental General Assistance

Program Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 4368b(h)) is amended by striking

‘‘$15,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘such sums as may be necessary’’.

Approved October 2, 1996.

Oct. 2, 1996

[S. 1834]
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# It's really spooky how well I drive after a few beers

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  It's really spooky how well I drive after a few beers 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. American Forces Information Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  American Forces Information Service, Department of Defense 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 97-0371-P. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Defense billboard ; 117; Defense billboard (1988) ; # 117. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
(Reap. Dec. 9775)

#### Humphrey & MacGregor, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 133.

(Decided August 25, 1960)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Goehr an Do tit,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

There was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing. The court thereupon ordered the case submitted.

It is provided by the rules of the court that, in such an instance, after the opposite party has had an opportunity to present evidence on the issues, the case may be decided by the court on the record before it.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the present appeal for a reappraisement and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         920,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,845,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   295,000
<INVENTORY>                                  9,491,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,598,000
<PP&E>                                      25,790,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,321,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,036,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,020,000
<BONDS>                                      3,200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,564,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,452,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,036,000
<SALES>                                     15,981,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,981,000
<CGS>                                       10,733,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,564,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                18,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             219,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                417,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   146,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            271,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   271,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 81/3 Ma

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 81 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 663 March 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 81

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 663 March 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 81/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2023/C 81/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 8 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 81/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2023/C 81/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                           TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  Exhibit 27, Financial Data Schedule to Report
                         on Form 10Q, November 30, 1997
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                                    <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            9-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                          FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                                  3,139,316
<SECURITIES>                                              631,922
<RECEIVABLES>                                          14,222,979
<ALLOWANCES>                                              173,264
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       18,033,531
<PP&E>                                                  2,016,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                            999,181
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         19,184,881
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   4,047,487
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                   59,883
<OTHER-SE>                                             15,077,511
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           19,184,881
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       51,260,976
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          37,426,481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        9,585,749
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         4,372,052
<INCOME-TAX>                                            1,972,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     2,400,052
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                            2,400,052
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0.40
                                     
        


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 69 (Wednesday, April 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6875]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 040407B]

Marine Mammals; File No. 877-1903

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; denial of permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a request for a scientific 
research permit submitted by Daniela Maldini, Okeanis, PO Box 818, 
Pacific Grove, CA 93950 has been denied.

ADDRESSES: The application and related documents are available for 
review upon written request or by appointment in the following 
office(s):
    Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 
20910; phone (301)713-2289; fax (301)427-2521; and
    Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long 
Beach, CA 90802-4213; phone (562)980-4001; fax (562)980-4018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jaclyn Daly or Amy Hapeman, (301)713-
2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 5, 2007, a notice was published 
in the Federal Register (72 FR 5273) that an application had been filed 
by the above named individual. The requested permit has been denied 
subject to the provisions of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 
(16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) and because the application did not meet 
permit issuance criteria set forth in the regulations governing the 
taking and importing of marine mammals (50 CFR part 216).
    The applicant requested a 5-year permit to biopsy bottlenose 
dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in waters off California, specifically 
Monterey Bay and the Santa Monica Basin. The proposed research 
objectives were to investigate stock structure, demographics, and 
contaminant loads of coastal and offshore populations.

    Dated: April 4, 2007.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of 
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-6875 Filed 4-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
```