alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION 

DELLA M. DRAISE, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-cv-542

)

PLAINTIFF, ) 

)

vs. ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE ABEL

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) 

COMMISSIONER OF )

SOCIAL SECURITY, )

)

DEFENDANT. )

ORDER

In accordance with the Stipulation to Remand filed by the parties on February 19, 2013,

the court hereby remands this case to the agency for further proceedings pursuant to the fourth

sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon receipt of the Court’s remand order, the Appeals Council

will remand the case to an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) with instructions to: update the

treatment evidence regarding Plaintiff’s medical condition, including the functional capacity

evaluation performed in October 2010; if warranted, obtain evidence from a medical expert to

clarify the nature and severity of Plaintiff’s impairments; further evaluate the opinions of the

treating medical sources, including those from Dr. Dewar, Dr. Esselstein, and Ms. Sixx, and

explain the weight to which each such opinion is entitled; further consider Plaintiff’s residual

functional capacity on the update record, citing specific evidence in support of the assessed

limitations; further consider whether Plaintiff has past relevant work she could perform with the

limitations established by the evidence; as appropriate, secure additional evidence from a

vocational expert to clarify the effect of the assessed limitations on the Plaintiff’s occupational

base; and evaluate the effect, if any, of Plaintiff’s subsequent application for benefits filed on

Case: 2:12-cv-00542-GLF-MRA Doc #: 21 Filed: 02/19/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
January 10, 2010, resulting in a fully favorable Administrative Law Judge decision that Plaintiff

was disabled beginning September 30, 2010.

Judgment in favor of Plaintiff shall issue. 

s/Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: All parties of record

2

Case: 2:12-cv-00542-GLF-MRA Doc #: 21 Filed: 02/19/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Re: HPV 2 Vertellus Toxicity Data to Satisfy Test Rule for CASRN 68187-84-8 

David Brooks to: John Schaeffer, Paul Campanella, Marcus 

Aguilar 10/25/2012 10:20 AM

Cc: Mark Townsend, Meena Sonawane

Hi John, Paul and Marcus,

We have reviewed our contractor's report and it is acceptable. Please see attached file.

Dave

David Brooks

Risk Assessment Division (7403M)

High Production Volume Chemical Branch

EPA East Room 6308N

(202) 564-8603

68187-84-8_HPV2 Final Data Adequacy10-25-12.docx

Paul Campanella Dave, Below are the data submission and Robu... 06/27/2012 11:54:29 AM

From: Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US

To: David Brooks/DC/USEPA/US

Cc: John Schaeffer/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Marcus Aguilar/DC/USEPA/US

Date: 06/27/2012 11:54 AM

Subject: HPV 2 Vertellus Toxicity Data to Satisfy Test Rule for CASRN 68187-84-8

Dave, Below are the data submission and Robust summaries from Vertellus for RAD review. I will send 

the PC data to EETD.

[attachment "Final Submission - 31 May 2012.pdf" deleted by David Brooks/DC/USEPA/US] [attachment 

"E1- Ames Mutagenicity Assay.pdf" deleted by David Brooks/DC/USEPA/US] [attachment "E1 RSS Ames 

Assay (OECD 471).pdf" deleted by David Brooks/DC/USEPA/US] [attachment "E2 Oxidized Castor Oil - 

Chromosomal Aberration .pdf" deleted by David Brooks/DC/USEPA/US] [attachment "E2 RSS Chrom 

Aberr (OECD 473).pdf" deleted by David Brooks/DC/USEPA/US] [attachment "F1 28-Day Oral Toxicity in 

Rats - OECD 42.pdf" deleted by David Brooks/DC/USEPA/US] [attachment "F1 RSS 28 day Oral.pdf" 

deleted by David Brooks/DC/USEPA/US] 

Paul J. Campanella, Ph.D.

Chemical Information and Testing Branch

Chemical Control Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Washington, D.C. 

202-564-8091
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-60,757] 

                    By application dated April 5, 2007, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on March 8, 2007 and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 22, 2007 (72 FR 13528).                 

The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the finding that imports of upholstered furniture did not contribute importantly to worker separations at the subject firm and no shift of production to a foreign source occurred. 

The Department reviewed the request for reconsideration and has determined that the petitioner has provided additional information. Therefore, the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974. 

## Conclusion 

After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th of April, 2007. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7-7617 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FILED AS
PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         3,575
<SECURITIES>                                  15,183
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,826
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              26,745
<PP&E>                                        78,039
<DEPRECIATION>                                26,933
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                84,558
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,705
<BONDS>                                       32,682
<COMMON>                                       2,740
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                    20,246
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  84,558
<SALES>                                        3,504
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              10,548
<CGS>                                          2,185
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,930
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,181
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  475
<INCOME-TAX>                                     204
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              271
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     271
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.20
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Daniel Johnston, Chief Financial Officer of United Components, Inc. certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Components, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which the report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.       Date: November 14, 2007 By:
(Reap. Dec. 9769)

#### The American International Products Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 776620, etc.

(Decided August 10, 1960)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Dowd,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise the subject of the above *464entitled appeals to reappraisement is properly dutiable on the basis of American Selling Price as defined in Section 402(g) Tariff Act of 1930 as amended and that the said American Selling Price was as follows for the export periods indicated.

> Item Period Price

> Pas Sodium 1959 $1.75 per lb. less *1%*net packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here in question and that such value for the involved items in each of the appeals herein at the time of exportation heretofore indicated was as hereinabove set forth in the stipulation of submission.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
##### 



Exhibit 31.3
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Toreador Resources Corporation;(2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;(3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operation and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;(4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     (5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
   Date: January 14, 2007/s/ Charles J. CampiseCharles J. CampiseVice President  Accounting and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, CONTAINED IN
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CORPORATION'S 1996 THIRD QUARTER REPORT ON FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,973
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,256
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     67,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               398,887
<PP&E>                                       3,605,057
<DEPRECIATION>                                 289,083
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,935,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          390,601
<BONDS>                                        729,814
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,789,039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,935,965
<SALES>                                        595,225
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,203,273
<CGS>                                          595,223
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  960,005
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                104,210
<INCOME-TAX>                                    40,492
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             63,718
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,718
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 382 

Recognizing Kenneth M. Mead’s service as the Inspector General of the 

Department of Transportation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2006 

Mr. STEVENS (for himself, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. BURNS, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. 

ROCKEFELLER, Mr. LOTT, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. SUNUNU, Mr. PRYOR, 

and Mr. NELSON of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which 

was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Kenneth M. Mead’s service as the Inspector 

General of the Department of Transportation. 

Whereas Kenneth M. Mead has announced his retirement 

as the Inspector General of the Department of 

Transportation after nearly 9 years of service in that 

position; 

Whereas Kenneth M. Mead and his staff conducted investigations independently, impartially, and with rigorous professionalism into myriad issues affecting 

transportation and transportation policy; 

Whereas Kenneth M. Mead and his staff provided independent, thorough, and relevant commentary and recommendations on a wide-range of Federal transporVerDate Aug 31 2005 02:08 Mar 10, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6301 E:\BILLS\SR382.ATS SR382

bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 382 ATS 

tation policies and programs, including aviation operations and safety, highway, auto and truck operations and safety, transportation security, rail operations and safety, and pipeline and hazardous materials transportation safety; 

Whereas, during Kenneth M. Mead’s tenure as Inspector 

General, the events of September 11, 2001, had a 

dramatic impact on the Federal government’s relationship with the aviation industry and posed significant challenges for ensuring the safety and security 

of public transportation in general and the United 

States aviation industry in particular; and 

Whereas Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta 

recognized Kenneth M. Mead’s contributions by describing him as ‘‘a tireless advocate for setting the 

highest possible standards of integrity, accountability, and performance’’ in the Department’s efforts 

to make the Nation’s transportation system as safe 

and efficient as possible: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the United States Senate commends 

2 Kenneth M. Mead for his more than 8 years of faithful 

3 and exemplary service to the Nation as the Inspector Gen4 eral of the Department of Transportation, and expresses 

5 its deep appreciation and gratitude for his long and out6 standing service. 

7 SEC. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit 

8 a copy of this resolution to Kenneth M. Mead. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 434 

Designating the week of May 22, 2006, as ‘‘National Corporate Compliance 

and Ethics Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 6, 2006 

Mr. SANTORUM submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of May 22, 2006, as ‘‘National 

Corporate Compliance and Ethics Week’’. 

Whereas the United States has experienced corporate scandals in recent years, resulting in serious legislation and 

regulation dealing with professional responsibility, ethics, 

and compliance programs; 

Whereas the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is a compelling example of legislative guidance that recognizes the important role of compliance programs for organizations that 

desire to maintain ethical and law-abiding workplaces, 

services, and products; 

Whereas the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, including recent 

amendments to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, emphasize and reinforce that there are specific consequences 

for noncompliance; 


wwhite on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 434 IS

Whereas many companies in the United States have responded by developing and implementing corporate ethics 

and compliance programs intended to detect and prevent 

violations of law, such as establishing a high level official 

to oversee compliance and integrity in the organization, 

auditing and monitoring mechanisms to test compliance, 

reporting mechanisms such as hotlines to ensure open 

communication, and training programs designed to educate employees on the laws, regulations, and policies that 

affect their business operation; 

Whereas the private sector has organized to provide the necessary resources for ethics and compliance professionals 

and others who wish to promote quality compliance 

through organizations such as the Health Care Compliance Association and the Society for Corporate Compliance and Ethics; and 

Whereas the establishment of a National Corporate Compliance and Ethics Week would celebrate the creation and 

maintenance of these ethics and compliance programs, 

and their resulting impact on the integrity, ethics, and 

compliance of the organizations that have created them: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates the week of May 

2 22, 2006, as ‘‘National Corporate Compliance and Ethics 

3 Week’’. 

Æ 


wwhite on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6451

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

CLEVELAND MCLEAN, JR., 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior 

District Judge. (2:90-cr-00105-HCM-TEM-5) 

Submitted: August 7, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Cleveland McLean, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip 

Rosenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Cleveland McLean, Jr., appeals from the district 

court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000) motion for 

reduction of sentence. While his motion was long, rambling, and 

difficult to understand, McLean cited Sentencing Guidelines 

Amendments 500, 570, and 640 as the basis for his motion. The 

district court construed the motion as invoking Amendments 706, 

711, and 715. Because the district court did not consider 

McLean’s motion on the grounds raised, we vacate and remand for 

reconsideration. We grant McLean’s motion to supplement his 

informal brief. We express no opinion on the merits of McLean’s 

motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

VACATED AND REMANDED