Appendix B: Tier 1 DEIS Public and Agency 

Involvement Summary 

Distribution of the Tier 1 DEIS

The Tier 1 DEIS was included in the Environmental Protection Agency’s Notice of Availability (NOA) 

published in the Federal Register on September 20, 2019. The NOA initiated the public and agency review 

and comment period, which ran for 45 days, ending on November 4, 2019. The complete Tier 1 DEIS, 

including the appendices and supporting documentation, was made available for review on GDOT’s and 

FRA’s project websites and was displayed at the public meetings. Instructions for sending comments were 

included in Section 4.5.4 of the Tier 1 DEIS. 

Legal notices announcing the publication of the Tier 1 DEIS and the public meetings appeared in three 

newspapers for each state within the Project Study Area. 

Public Meetings

GDOT advertised notice of public meetings and the availability of the Tier 1 DEIS as well as any other 

project information twice within the 45-day agency and public comment period. The advertisements were 

made thirty days in advance of each public meeting, and again two weeks prior to the date of each public 

meeting. These were advertised through three separate newspapers, state DOT (GDOT, NCDOT and 

SCDOT) social media outlets, and press releases. 

FRA and GDOT held three open-house style public meetings, one each in Atlanta, GA, Greenville, SC, and 

Charlotte, NC. The purpose of these meetings was to provide agencies and the general public with the 

opportunity to learn about the proposed project, ask questions, and provide verbal or written comments on 

the DEIS, the proposed alternatives, and other issues related to the development of the Project. Information 

was made available on FRA and GDOT project websites for those that could not attend the meetings. 

Opportunities to provide online comments were also made available via an online comment form on 

GDOT’s project website. Additionally, a court reporter was present at each meeting for those who wanted 

to dictate verbal comments. 

Meeting attendees received a project fact sheet and a comment card, which mirrored the online comment 

form. The public meetings were conducted in an open house format. No formal presentation was given; 

however, nine display boards were exhibited in the meeting rooms for the public to view and ask questions. 

The displays were staffed by Project team members. A hardcopy of the Tier 1 DEIS and the supporting 

map books (refer to Appendix A of the Tier 1 DEIS) were available for review at the public meetings. 

Representatives from the FRA and GDOT were also available to answer any questions. Meeting venues 

and materials were coordinated with SCDOT, NCDOT, and local jurisdictions. 

ADDITIONAL PUBLIC OUTREACH ACTIVITIES 

Following the three public meetings, representatives from the Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln Metropolitan 

Planning Organization (MPO) requested an additional briefing to their constituents due to the proximity of 

all evaluated alternatives. A GDOT Project Manager provided a brief presentation to the Gaston-ClevelandLincoln MPO Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) during the regularly scheduled TCC meeting on 

Wednesday, November 13, 2019 to share information on the Project. 

Comments and Responses on the Tier 1 DEIS

FRA and GDOT encouraged public review and comment on the Tier 1 DEIS at each of the public meetings 

and through the various advertisements (i.e., legal ads, social media posts, and press releases). During the 
45-day public review and comment period, GDOT received a total of 2,154 public and agency comments. 

Comments were submitted electronically via an online comment form, through written comment cards at 

the public meetings, and verbally to the court reporter at public meetings.

Of the 2,154 agency and public comments submitted, most were in support of the overall proposed project. 

111 comments (5%) expressed opposition to the project. 1,260 comments expressed clear support for one 

or more Preferred Corridor Alternatives, as follows:

• Greenfield Preferred Corridor Alternative = 957 

• Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative = 173

• I-85 Corridor Alternative = 130

Approximately 76% of commenters who expressed support for a Preferred Corridor Alternative chose the 

Greenfield Corridor Alternative, followed by the Southern Crescent (14%) and the I-85 Corridor Alternative 

(10%). 51 respondents (4%) expressed support for more than one Preferred Corridor Alternative. Many 

comments expressed support for the fastest and most reliable travel times between major population areas 

along the corridor, which is consistent with the public’s choice for the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. Many 

commenters also expressed support for stations in their communities, or stations serving airports or 

universities. Commenters were also interested in the environmental benefits of non-vehicular modes, the 

economic benefits of passenger rail service, and potential connections between passenger rail and local 

transit systems. 

SCDOT and NCDOT also provided letters of support for the Preferred Corridor Alternative. On May 29, 

2020 SCDOT submitted a letter to GDOT stating that due to high potential impacts in five environmental 

categories and significant construction on Interstate 85, SCDOT concurred with selection of the 

Greenfield Corridor as the Preferred Corridor Alternative. On April 15, 2020, NCDOT submitted a letter of 

support to GDOT concurring with selection of the Greenfield Corridor Alternative as the Preferred Corridor 

Alternative, provided that additional studies are conducted as a part of the Tier 2 NEPA process to 

determine how the Greenfield Alignment can best access the Charlotte/Metrolina region. 

FRA and GDOT have reviewed the public and agency comments and have prepared responses while taking 

comments into consideration in the decision-making process for the Tier 1 EIS. Upon publication of this 

Tier 1 FEIS/ROD, responses to comments will be provided online for public and agency reference. An 

additional 30-day waiting period will be held after the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD is issued to allow for public and 

agency input on the selection of the Preferred Corridor Alternative. The 30-day waiting period will not be a 

formal comment and review period. Individual responses to comments submitted will not be provided. 

However, the FRA and the GDOT and any other future project sponsors will consider input received on this 

Tier 1 FEIS/ROD in subsequent phases of the Project, which may include a Tier 2 NEPA process. 
APPENDIX B

Tier 1 DEIS Public Meeting Information

1. FRA Letter to EPA for submittal of Tier 1 DEIS into Federal 

Register

2. GDOT Agency Distribution Letter for Tier 1 DEIS

3. GDOT Tier 1 DEIS Distribution Email for Atlanta to Charlotte Email 

Listserv 

4. Tier 1 DEIS Newsletter 

5. Tier 1 DEIS Public Meeting Comment Card 

6. GDOT Tier 1 DEIS Press Release 

7. Tier 1 DEIS Public Meeting Newspaper Ads and Legal Notice 
 

 

September 11, 2019 

NEPA Section, Strategic Program Office 

U. S. EPA Region 4 

61 Forsyth Street, SW 

Atlanta, GA 30303 

Re: Tier I EIS for the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail 

 Corridor Investment Plan

To Whom It May Concern: 

With this letter, please find two copies of the Tier I Environmental Impact Statement 

(EIS) for the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan (Project) – one paper 

copy and one electronic copy. The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) is the lead Federal 

Agency for the Project and the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) is FRA’s State 

partner for the EIS. 

FRA anticipates that the EIS will be uploaded to the Environmental Protection Agency’s eNEPA 

website the week of September 9th and GDOT is in the process of distributing the EIS to 

interested agencies and other parties. 

If you have any questions, please contact me at 202-493-6067 or John.Winkle@dot.gov. 

Sincerely, 

John Winkle 

Transportation Industry Analyst 

Enclosures 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 
Russell R. McMurry, P.E., Commissioner

One Georgia Center 

600 West Peachtree Street, NW 

Atlanta, GA 30308

(404) 631-1000 Main Office

September 12, 2019

Agency Official 

Agency Name

Agency Address Line 1

Agency Address Line 2 

City, State, Zip

RE: Tier 1 DEIS for the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan 

Dear Agency Name,

The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), in cooperation with the Georgia Department 

of Transportation (GDOT) is pleased to announce the release of the Tier 1 Draft

Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the proposed Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger 

Rail Corridor Investment Plan (the Project). Enclosed is a USB drive containing an 

electronic version of the Tier 1 DEIS document. Paper copies are available upon request. 

The Tier 1 DEIS will be published in the federal register on September 20, 2019 and the 

public and agency review and comment period will occur between September 20, 2019

and November 4, 2019. The primary purpose of the Tier 1 DEIS is to present the 

Project’s Purpose and Need and evaluate the potential effects of three Corridor 

Alternatives and a No-Build alternative. FRA will identify a NEPA Preferred Corridor 

Alternative based on input from the public, stakeholders, Native American Tribes, 

Federal, State, and local agencies. The Tier 1 DEIS was prepared in accordance with 

the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and its implementing regulations 

(40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Parts 1500-1508). Your agency is receiving 

notification that this Tier 1 DEIS is available for review as it was identified as a

Participating Agency during the Tier 1 EIS process. 

As of September 20, 2019 the Tier 1 DEIS is available on the federal register website and 

on the project website (http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoCharlotte). Public meetings 

will be announced on the project website and published in local newspapers. Paper 

copies will be available at public locations, which will be announced on the project website 

as well. 

1

Mertz, Kaycee

From: Mertz, Kaycee on behalf of AtlantaCharlotteHSR

Sent: Friday, September 20, 2019 5:09 PM

Subject: Project Updates

Hello, 

You are receiving this message because you have requested updates regarding the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail 

Corridor Investment Plan (PRCIP). 

For the latest updates and materials, please see the project website here: 

http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoCharlotte. 

GDOT and the FRA welcome your comments and questions on the Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement. You 

may submit your comments or questions online here: Comment Form

Thank you for your interest in this project. 
As part of the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan

(the Project), the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and the Georgia 

Department of Transportation (GDOT) prepared a Tier 1 Draft 

Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the extension of the Southeast 

High Speed Rail (SEHSR) corridor from Charlotte to Atlanta. The vision of 

the SEHSR Corridor is to develop an integrated passenger rail 

transportation solution for the Southeast, including proposed high-speed 

rail from Washington, DC through Richmond, VA, Charlotte and Raleigh, NC, 

and from Charlotte to Atlanta, GA. GDOT and FRA recently reached a major

milestone for the Project with the release of the Tier 1 DEIS on September 

20, 2019, a result of multiple years of technical analysis and collaboration 

with agencies and the public.

This newsletter provides information on the Tier 1 DEIS, including analysis 

of three Corridor Alternatives and key findings. FRA and GDOT encourage 

the public, agencies and interested organizations to provide comments on 

the Tier 1 DEIS. The comments received on the Tier 1 DEIS will help 

determine the identification of a Preferred Corridor Alternative for the Tier 1 

Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and Record of Decision (ROD).

The agency and public comment period for the Tier 1 DEIS is open from 

September 20, 2019 to November 4, 2019. Materials are available online 

at dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoCharlotte. The website will have the same 

materials as the in-person meetings.

The public can submit comments and questions to: 

AtlantaCharlotteHSR@dot.ga.gov

PASSENGER RAIL CORRIDOR INVESTMENT PLAN

NEPA Process 2

Purpose and Need 3

Project Schedule 3

Alternatives Considered 4

Corridor Alternatives & Analysis 5

Atlanta Approach 6

Technology and Speed Options 7

Operating Speed and Travel Time 8

Key Findings 9

Next Steps 10

Atlanta, Georgia

10/22/19, 5:30pm – 8:00pm

Georgia Department of Transportation 

600 West Peachtree Street NW

Atlanta, GA 30308

Greenville, South Carolina

10/23/19, 5:30pm – 8:00pm

Greenville County Square

301 University Ridge Suite 400

Greenville, SC 29601

Charlotte, North Carolina

10/24/19, 5:30pm – 8:00pm

Metrolina TMC

2327 Tipton Drive

Charlotte, NC 28206
2

Decisions that are discussed in this Tier 1 DEIS, but will be deferred to a Tier 2 Analysis include: station locations, rail 

alignment within the Preferred Corridor Alternative, airport connections, train technology, and the Atlanta Approach. 

Future NEPA steps following this Tier 1 DEIS could also include the following: (1) Tier 2 EIS; (2) Preliminary Engineering 

(could be concurrent with Tier 2 study); (3) Service Development Plan (could be concurrent with Tier 2 study); (4)

Identification of Project Funding; (5) Final Design; (6) Right-of way (ROW) acquisition; and (7) Construction. Tier 2 EIS 

studies focus on the analysis of project and alignment specific impacts, whereas the Tier 1 EIS focuses on defining 

broader, corridor-wide impacts. 

 

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires 

federal agencies to assess the environmental effects of 

their proposed actions prior to making decisions. FRA 

determined that a tiered NEPA process is appropriate for 

a project of this scale, as tiering involves a staged 

environmental review process applied to complex 

projects covering large geographic areas. 

For the project, this Tier 1 DEIS establishes:

• Purpose and Need 

• A broad assessment of the potential 

transportation, social, economic, and 

environmental impacts of Corridor Alternatives 

• The outcomes of public and agency 

coordination 

The Tier 1 DEIS also identifies general locations for 

potential stations; and discusses potential train 

technology, speed, and frequency necessary to support 

the Purpose and Need of the Project. After the public and 

interested agencies provide comments on the Tier 1 

DEIS, FRA and GDOT will publish the Final Environmental 

Impact Statement/Record of Decision (FEIS/ROD). The 

FEIS will respond to comments on the Tier 1 DEIS, 

discuss any changes made since the release of the DEIS, 

and FRA and GDOT will select a Preferred Corridor 

Alternative that could be evaluated further in a Tier 2 

study. At this time, funding has not been identified to 

initiate a Tier 2 study for the Atlanta to Charlotte corridor.

The exhibit on the right illustrates the tiered NEPA 

process.
3

Preliminary Engineering (PE) includes design work and analysis that leads to the production of construction plans and 

cost estimates for the Project. PE could include track alignment, station locations, bridge designs, and engineering and 

traffic surveys. Final Design concludes the engineering and design work with the production of final plans and prepares 

the project for right-of-way (ROW) acquisition and construction. A Service Development Plan (SDP) defines the service 

improvements, transportation network, operational and financial aspects for the Preferred Alternative selected through 

the NEPA process.

 

 

The Purpose of the Project is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the 

region’s transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and reliability through high-speed passenger rail 

services.

GDOT has identified seven transportation system needs relevant to the study area with each corresponding to the 

anticipated population and employment growth with increasing travel demand. 

The Project would satisfy the following needs:

• Population and Employment Growth

• Improve Regional Transportation System Connectivity

• Increase Transportation System Capacity

• Improve Travel Times and Reliability

• Provide an Alternative Travel Mode

• Traveler Safety

• Improve Energy Efficiency and Air Quality

• Maintain and Enhance Economic Growth and Vitality
4

GDOT started with six Corridor Alternatives identified by a 2008 United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) 

study. Three of the six alternatives were advanced by GDOT for further analysis based on their performance and 

conformity to the Purpose and Need: the Southern Crescent, I-85, and Greenfield. GDOT conducted high-level 

operational and performance analysis of the three Corridor Alternatives and identified potential station opportunities, 

considered rail technology and speed considerations, and identified two options for approaching metro Atlanta (the 

Atlanta Approach). Finally, GDOT evaluated potential environmental impacts of the three Corridor Alternatives using 

high-level measures appropriate for Tier 1 environmental analysis. 

The Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative is 268 miles and primarily follows the Norfolk Southern (NS) Piedmont 

Division ROW, which hosts the existing Amtrak Crescent long-distance service between Atlanta and Charlotte. This 

Corridor Alternative proposes operating fully on shared freight and passenger tracks for the standard operating

speed or proposes constructing some sections of passenger only track for the higher speed alternative. This corridor 

could serve three stations in North Carolina at Charlotte Gateway, Charlotte-Douglas International Airport (CLT)

airport, and Gastonia; four stations in South Carolina in Spartanburg, Greer, Greenville, and Clemson; and six 

stations in Georgia in Toccoa, Gainesville, Suwanee, Doraville, downtown Atlanta, and Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta 

International Airport (H-JAIA).

The I-85 Corridor Alternative is 255 miles and located primarily within the interstate highway ROW on a dedicated

high-speed passenger rail alignment following I-85 between Gastonia, NC and Suwanee, GA, then following a shared

railroad ROW in the approaches to the Charlotte and Atlanta termini. This corridor could serve three stations in North 

Carolina at Charlotte Gateway, CLT airport, and Gastonia; three stations in South Carolina in Spartanburg, Greenville, 

and Anderson; and four stations in Georgia in Suwanee, Doraville, downtown Atlanta, and H-JAIA.

The Greenfield Corridor Alternative is 274 miles and primarily on a new “greenfield” corridor on land without prior 

transportation use. This Corridor Alternative proposes a dedicated high-speed passenger rail alignment for a 

majority of the corridor, then follows shared freight railroad ROW in the approaches to the Charlotte and Atlanta 

termini. This route could serve three stations in North Carolina at Charlotte Gateway, CLT airport, and South 

Gastonia; two stations in South Carolina at Greenville-Spartanburg International airport (GSP) and Anderson; and 

five stations in Georgia in Athens, Suwanee, Doraville, downtown Atlanta, and H-JAIA.
5

The table below summarizes the results of the Tier 1 operational and performance analysis

including 2050 projections:

Alternative

Top 

Operating 

Speed*

(MPH)

End to End 

Travel Time

(hrs.:mins.)

Frequency 

(daily round 

trips)

Capital 

Cost**

2050 

Projected

Annual 

Ridership

2050 

Projected 

Annual 

Revenue***

2050 

Projected 

Annual 

O&M Cost

Revenue/O&M 

Cost

(over 30-year 

period)

Southern 

Crescent 79-110 4:35-5:34 4

$2.0B-

$2.3B

0.94M1.18M$43.5M-

$56.9M

$63.17M-

$66.1M 0.66 to 0.82

I-85 125-180 2:42-2:50 14 $13.3B-

$15.4B

5.50M5.62M$369.0M-

$377.2M

$192.9M-

$169.9M 2.05 to 2.30

Greenfield 125-220 2:06-2:44 16 – 22 $6.2B-

$8.4B

5.38M6.30M$397.9M-

$475.8M

$205.7M- 

$211.9M 2.08 to 2.32

* As described in DEIS Section 2.2.2.4, operating speeds are a function of equipment technology, geometry, topography, and other corridor characteristics. Generally, top 

speeds are only sustained for portions of the trip, the extent of which varies by Corridor Alternative. 

** Costs shown in 2012 dollars, reflecting the year of analysis

*** Revenue includes tickets and on-board services
6

GDOT evaluated two options for each of the Corridor Alternatives to approach downtown Atlanta in this Tier 1 Draft EIS 

document: the Southern Crescent ROW, operated by Norfolk Southern (NS), and the CSX ROW. The NS ROW travels 

through Gainesville, Suwanee, and Doraville. The CSX ROW travels through Lawrenceville and Tucker before entering 

downtown from the east. Both approaches converge at Howell Junction and follow a common Class I railroad ROW

along the NS/CSX corridor to access a station in downtown Atlanta and H-JAIA. GDOT assumes the Southern Crescent 

Corridor Alternative could use either approach; however, operating on shared tracks due to the modest level of service

and limited operating speed. GDOT also assumes the I-85 and Greenfield Corridor Alternatives could use either 

approach; however, operating on dedicated tracks and sharing the freight railroad ROW. Both options have similar travel 

time, but they would serve different station locations in the metro Atlanta suburbs.

Due to the complex environment of the approaches to and through Atlanta, and the nature of a tiered NEPA process, 

this Tier 1 EIS defers the selection of the preferred Atlanta Approach to a future Tier 2 EIS. In addition to the two potential 

Atlanta Approaches defined in this DEIS (NS and CSX), a future Tier 2 EIS could also identify additional feasible 

approaches or construction methods traversing the Atlanta metro area.
7

Generally classified into two categories of operating speeds, the three Corridor Alternatives anticipate maximum 

operating speeds between 79 mph and 125 mph utilizing diesel technology, compared to an anticipated operating 

speed of up to 220 mph with electric technology. Operating speeds will vary along each corridor depending on a 

range of factors such as: topography (i.e. grade), geometry (i.e. curves), distance between stations and electric vs. 

diesel train technology.

This Tier 1 EIS evaluated diesel powered trains paired with both conventional (non-tilting) and tilting technologies. 

Conventional trains travel at speeds ranging from 79 mph to 115 mph compared to trains with tilting cars traveling 

at speeds up to 125 mph. Tilting cars allow trains to maintain higher speed on curves that would otherwise limit travel 

speed.

Electric train technology utilizes electric power delivered directly to the trainset using overhead catenary power lines. 

The Tier 1 DEIS evaluated electric train technology with tilting passenger coaches in alternatives with speeds above 

125 mph to 220 mph. The table below summaries the two speed options evaluated for each of the three Corridor 

Alternatives. 
8

 

Corridor Alternative Rail Technology & Infrastructure Top Operating Speed Travel Time 

(hours: minutes)

Southern Crescent

Diesel trains sharing tracks with 

freight traffic 79 mph 5:34

Diesel trains using a combination of 

shared and dedicated tracks 110 mph 4:35

I-85

Diesel trains on dedicated tracks 125 mph 2:50

Electric trains on dedicated tracks 180 mph 2:42

Greenfield

Diesel trains on dedicated tracks 125 mph 2:44

Electric trains on dedicated tracks 220 mph 2:06

The table below summaries the two speed options evaluated for each of the three Corridor Alternatives. Trains cannot 

reach top operating speeds on all portions of the corridor. All Corridor Alternatives propose utilizing freight rail ROW for 

the Atlanta Approach reflected in the total travel time. 
9

GDOT evaluated each of the three Corridor Alternatives and the two Atlanta Approach options for potential impacts to 

environmental resources. GDOT generally used a 600-foot wide screening area around each Corridor Alternative and 

the No-Build Alternative as a baseline for comparison purposes. The No-Build Alternative is the future condition of an 

area in the absence of a project; it assumes that no improvements will be made with the exception of periodic 

maintenance and minor enhancements needed to maintain safe operation and those improvements already designated 

in an approved plan. The table below summarizes the results of the environmental screening process. For more detailed 

information about environmental resources and methodologies, refer to Chapter 3 of the DEIS.
10

GDOT invites the public and interested agencies to any of three Public Information Open House (PIOH) events during 

October 2019 to better understand the project, review the information in the Tier 1 DEIS, and provide comments 

and questions on the project. Additionally, the public may review materials from the PIOH online at: 

http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoCharlotte.

GDOT will accept public and agency comments for this Tier 1 DEIS from September 20, 2019 to November 4, 2019.

Please submit comments by way of email to the address AtlantaCharlotteHSR@dot.ga.gov or by regular mail to:

Kaycee Mertz

Rail and Transit Planning Manager

Georgia Department of Transportation 

Division of Intermodal

600 West Peachtree Street NW 

Atlanta, GA 30308

Atlanta, Georgia

Tuesday, October 22, 2019

Georgia Department of 

Transportation

600 West Peachtree Street NW

Atlanta, GA 30308

5:30pm – 8:00pm

Greenville, South Carolina

Wednesday, October 23, 2019

Greenville County Square

301 University Ridge Suite 400

Greenville, SC 29601

5:30pm – 8:00pm

Charlotte, North Carolina

Thursday, October 24, 2019

Metrolina Transportation 

Management Center (TMC)

2327 Tipton Drive 

Charlotte, NC 28206

5:30pm – 8:00pm

Following the public and agency comment period, FRA and GDOT will select a Preferred Alternative and document 

this process likely in a combined Final FEIS/ROD document. GDOT will base the Preferred Alternative decision on 

feedback and comments from the public and agencies, performance of each Corridor Alternative, and the potential 

environmental impacts of each Corridor Alternative. The Final EIS/ROD document will include a list of all revisions 

made to address feedback received during the 45-day review period.

The following decisions will be deferred to a Tier 2 Analysis: station locations, project alignment within the Preferred 

Corridor Alternative, airport connections, technology, and the Atlanta Approach. 
 P.I. T004193

Comment Card

Please print responses.

Name 

Address 

 

Select a category

□ Environmental Process □ Corridor Alternatives □ Public Meetings □ General/Other

Comments 

 

Did you attend, or do you plan to attend one of the public open house meetings?□ Yes □ No 

Did you review the document and/or the meeting materials? □ Yes □ No

If yes, did you understand the project after reviewing the materials? □ Yes □ No 

How did you hear about this project? □ Newspaper □ Other media □ Project mailing list 

□ GDOT Website □ Word of mouth □ Other (please specify) 

 

 

Mail to:

Ms. Kaycee Mertz, Rail & Transit Planning Manager

Georgia Department of Transportation

Division of Intermodal

600 West Peachtree Street, NW

Atlanta, Georgia 30308
Public Comment Sought on Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor

https://mailchi.mp/...0https://mailchi.mp/45672f703ffa/public-comment-sought-on-atlanta-to-charlotte-passenger-rail-corridor?e=01317cc7b8[1/28/2020 2:02:47 PM]

Please do not reply to NewsReleases@dot.ga.gov.

View this email in your browser

For Immediate Release:

Thursday, October 17, 2019

Contact:

Scott Higley 404.347.0543

Public Comment Sought on Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail

Corridor

ATLANTA, GA – The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and the Georgia Department of
Public Comment Sought on Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor

https://mailchi.mp/...0https://mailchi.mp/45672f703ffa/public-comment-sought-on-atlanta-to-charlotte-passenger-rail-corridor?e=01317cc7b8[1/28/2020 2:02:47 PM]

Transportation (Georgia DOT) are seeking public comment on the Tier I Draft Environmental

Impact Statement (DEIS) for the extension of the Southeast High-Speed Rail (SEHSR) corridor

from Charlotte, North Carolina to Atlanta, Ga., a project of the Passenger Rail Corridor Investment

Plan (PRCIP). Three open houses are scheduled – one occurring in Atlanta, Georgia; one in

Greenville, South Carolina; and the third in Charlotte, North Carolina. The public is encouraged to

participate and comment in person or online.

Public Open Houses

Date: Tuesday, October 22, 2019

Location: Georgia Department of Transportation

600 W. Peachtree St. NW

Atlanta, Georgia 30308

Time: 5:30 – 8 pm

Date: Wednesday, October 23, 2019

Location: Greenville County Square

301 University Ridge, Suite 400

Greenville, SC 29601

Time: 5:30 – 8 pm

Date: Thursday, October 24, 2019

Location: Metrolina Transportation Management Center

2327 Tipton Dr.

Charlotte, NC 28206

Time: 5:30 – 8 pm

Georgia DOT and FRA recently reached a major milestone for the project with the release of the

Tier 1 DEIS, a result of extensive technical analysis and collaboration with agencies and the

public.

The purpose of the Atlanta to Charlotte DEIS is to improve intercity passenger travel between

Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region’s transportation system capacity and improving trip

time and reliability through high-speed passenger rail services. The corridor is also an important

extension to the planned SEHSR corridor system which will connect Washington DC, Richmond

VA and Charlotte, NC. When complete, it will improve capacity and travel times, provide an

alternative to other modes of travel, enhance energy efficiency, promote economic development,

and increase traveler safety.

The plan lays out three options for the proposed Atlanta to Charlotte DEIS with a no build

alternative serving as the baseline. FRA and Georgia DOT encourage the public, agencies and

interested organizations to provide comments on the Tier 1 DEIS. The comments received will

help determine the identification of a Preferred Corridor Alternative for the Tier 1 Final

Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and Record of Decision (ROD).

Georgia DOT will base the preferred alternative decision on feedback and comments from the

public and agencies, performance of each corridor alternative and the potential environmental
Public Comment Sought on Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor

https://mailchi.mp/...0https://mailchi.mp/45672f703ffa/public-comment-sought-on-atlanta-to-charlotte-passenger-rail-corridor?e=01317cc7b8[1/28/2020 2:02:47 PM]

impacts of each corridor alternative.

The Agency and public comment period for the Tier 1 DEIS is open until November 4, 2019.

Comments may be made in person or via the online comment form. 

The public is encouraged to visit the website to review the PIOH materials and the information

presented in the Tier 1 DEIS, as well as ask questions or provide comments.

To stay informed on the improvement plans updates, send an email to join the mailing list for the

Atlanta to Charlotte PRCIP.

Georgia Department of Transportation plans, constructs and maintains Georgia’s state and federal highways. We’re involved in

bridge, waterway, public transit, rail, general aviation, bike and pedestrian programs. And we help local governments maintain

their roads. Georgia DOT and its nearly 4,000 employees are committed to delivering a transportation system focused on

innovation, safety, sustainability and mobility. The Department’s vision is to boost Georgia’s competitiveness through

leadership in transportation.

###

Follow Us Like Us Visit Us See Us Watch US

The information you provide to the Georgia Department of Transportation will be used solely by GDOT. The

Department does not sell or offer a subscriber's personal information to third parties for marketing purposes. To no

longer receive this e-news letter, please select "unsubscribe from this list" below.

For questions, contact Strategic Communications.

Copyright © 2019 Georgia Department of Transportation, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:

Georgia Department of Transportation

Office of Communications

600 West Peachtree Street N.W.

Atlanta, GA 30308

Want to change how you receive these emails?

You can unsubscribe from this list


+

On Thursday, October 24, 2019 at Metrolina Transportation Mana

Tipton Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28206, the Georgia Departmen

hold a Public Open House meeting concerning the project listed above

This project proposes to improve intercity passenger travel between A

expanding the region’s transportation system capacity and improving 

through high-speed passenger rail services. The Tier 1 Draft Environme

establishes the Project’s Purpose and Need and conducts a broa

environmental and transportation impacts of three Corridor Alterna

Alternative.

The purpose of this Public Open House meeting is to provide the pub

to view the project, ask questions, and comment on the project.

The Open House meeting will be held from 5:30 PM to 8:00 PM. It w

public is invited to attend anytime during these hours. There will be no 

court reporter will be available to allow the public an opportunity to m

about the project.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information:

The meeting site is accessible to persons with disabilities. Accommo

disabilities can be arranged with advance notice by calling the M

Management Center 704-342-6814.

Written statements will be accepted concerning this project until M

2019. Written statements may be submitted to:

Georgia Department of Transportation

Attn: Kaycee Mertz

600 West Peachtree Street, NW – 6th Floor

Atlanta, Georgia 30308

Copies of the Tier I Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) wil

the Open House meeting.

The displays at the Public Open House meeting will be available for te

the Open House at the location stated above. In addition, comments an

from the Open House meeting will be available at this location when ava

LP4389874


305 Sout
Public Meeting Display Boards
The Atlanta to Charlotte Corridor 

spans approximately 280 miles in 

Georgia, South Carolina, and North 

Carolina which GDOT proposes to 

connect with high-speed rail.

The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) 

serves as the lead federal agency on the 

project, and the Georgia Department of 

Transportation (GDOT) is the project sponsor.

The Tier 1 EIS comprises four 

primary components:

1) The development of the Project’s Purpose

and Need

2) Identifying and evaluating potential

Corridor Alternatives

3) Evaluating the potential environmental

impacts of the Corridor Alternatives with

the No-Build Alternative serving as

the baseline

4) Selecting and documenting the Preferred

Corridor Alternative.

Corridor Alternatives: A generalized area of travel that is 

600 feet wide

No-Build Alternative: The future condition of an area in 

the absence of a project

Project

Overview

Figure 2: Public Meeting Board #1
There are eight 

transportation system 

needs identified 

for the Study Area

as shown on the right.

The Project would support 

the following needs: 

Population and 

Employment Growth

Improve Regional Transportation 

System Connectivity 

Increase Transportation 

System Capacity 

Improve Travel Times 

and Reliability

Provide an Alternative 

Travel Mode

Traveler Safety

Improve Energy Eciency 

and Air Quality 

Maintain and Enhance 

Economic Growth and Vitality 

The purpose of the 

Project is to improve 

intercity passenger 

travel between 

Atlanta and Charlotte.

Purpose

Need

Figure 3: Public Meeting Board #2
Corridor Alternatives

GDOT & FRA evaluated three Corridor Alternatives in the Tier 1 EIS: the Southern Crescent, I-85, 

and Greenfield. GDOT identified potential station opportunities, considered rail technology and 

speed options, and identified two options for approaching metro Atlanta (the Atlanta Approach). 

Decisions on these project elements are deferred until a Tier 2 study.

Figure 4: Public Meeting Board #3
Tier 1

Environmental Impact

Statement (EIS) Process What’s an EIS?

An EIS is a comprehensive study that provides the 

public and decision-makers with key information 

on the alternatives under consideration and their 

potential impacts to the built, natural, and human 

environments within the project study area.

A Tier I EIS includes:

WE 

ARE 

HERE

Analysis will be refined during Tier 2 studies.

Scoping Process

Notice of Intent (NOI) published, initiating a formal 

scoping process and a public comment period.

Dra EIS

Dra EIS approved by Federal Railroad 

Administration (FRA) for public review.

Public Comment Period

45-day period to receive public and agency input.

Final EIS/Record of Decision

Combined Final EIS/Record of Decision (ROD) 

will identify the Preferred Corridor Alternative.

FRA publishes Notice of 

Availability in Federal Register

NEPA Process and Project Timeline

Broad, 

high-level 

environmental 

review

“Desktop 

analysis” 

based on 

available 

mapping, 

information

Physical 

(footprint) 

eects 

based on 

corridor 

alternatives

Figure 5: Public Meeting Board #4
 Categories Definitions Southern Crescent I-85 Greenfield

 Diverted Trips Projected Automobile, Air, 

and Bus Trips Diverted To Rail

 Socioeconomic and 

Environmental Justice

 Percentage of Census Block Groups 

Meeting EJ Criteria For Minority and 

Low-Income Populations

 Noise Number of Potential Noise 

Receptor Impacts

 Vibration Number of Potential Vibration 

Receptor Impacts

 Parklands and Wildlife Refuges Acres of Parklands and Wildlife 

Refuge Sites

 Cultural and Historic Resources Number of Known Cultural Resources

 Threatened and Endangered 

Species Habitats

 Number of Known Threatened and 

Endangered Species Habitats

 Wetlands Acres of Wetlands

 Waterbody Crossings Number of Waterbody Crossings 

(Rivers, Streams, Lakes)

 Floodplains Acres of Floodplains

 Community Facilities Number of Known 

Community Facilities

Environmental Impacts 

Comparison

Lowest Potential

Impact

Moderate Potential

Impact

Highest Potential

Impact

The results are based on a comparison of the three Corridor Alternatives against the No Build alternative.

Figure 6: Public Meeting Board #5
Address public and 

agency comments

Select and document 

the Preferred Corridor 

Alternative

Publish the Tier 1 Final 

Environmental Impact 

Statement (FEIS) and 

Record of Decision (ROD)

Decisions deferred 

for a Tier 2 Analysis

• Station locations

• Project alignment within

the Preferred Corridor

Alternative

• Airport connections

• Technology

• The Atlanta Approach

Next 

Steps

Figure 7: Public Meeting Board #6
Southern Crescent 

Corridor Alternative

Top Operating Speed (MPH)

Revenue/O&M Cost

Diesel 

Shared Track

79

Diesel Shared and 

Dedicated Track

79 to 110

End to End Travel Time (hrs:min)

Diesel 

Shared Track

5:34

Diesel Shared and 

Dedicated Track

4:35

2050 

Annual Ridership Capital Cost 2050 Annual 

O&M Cost

0.94 M to 

1.18 M

$2.0 B to 

$2.3 B

$63.17 M to 

$66.1 M

I-85 Corridor

Alternative

Top Operating Speed (MPH)

Diesel 

Dedicated Track

125

Diesel 

Dedicated Track

125

Electric 

Dedicated Track

180

Electric 

Dedicated Track

220

End to End Travel Time (hrs:min)

Revenue/O&M Cost

Diesel 

Dedicated Track

2:50

Electric 

Dedicated Track

2:42

2050 

Annual Ridership Capital Cost 2050 Annual O&M Cost

5.50 M to 

5.62 M

2.05 to 2.30

2.08 to 2.32

0.66 to 0.82

$13.3 B to 

$15.4 B

$192.9 M to 

$169.9 M

Greenfield Corridor 

Alternative

Top Operating Speed (MPH)

End to End Travel Time (hrs:min)

Revenue/O&M Cost

Diesel 

Dedicated Track

2:44

Electric 

Dedicated Track

2:06

2050 

Annual Ridership Capital Cost 2050 Annual O&M Cost

5.38 M to 

6.30 M

$6.2 B to 

$8.4 B

$205.7 M 

to $211.9 M

Figure 8: Public Meeting Board #7
The Atlanta Approach

GDOT evaluated two options for each of the Corridor Alternatives to access downtown Atlanta: the Norfolk 

Southern Atlanta Approach (Southern Crescent) or the CSX Atlanta Approach, as shown in the map. Due 

to the complex environment of the approaches to and through Atlanta, the Tier 1 EIS defers the selection of 

the preferred Atlanta Approach to a future Tier 2 study. A Tier 2 study could also consider other commuter 

and intercity rail planning eorts and additional alignment options for the Atlanta Approach.

Representative Alignments

Greenfield with CSX Atlanta Approach

I-85 with CSX Atlanta Approach

Cresent with CSX Atlanta Approach

Greenfield with Norfolk Southern Atlanta Approach

I-85 with Norfolk Southern Atlanta Approach

Cresent with Norfolk Southern Atlanta Approach

All Alternatives

Stations

Figure 9: Public Meeting Board #8
Diesel Electric

Train Speed and Train Technology

This Tier 1 EIS evaluated diesel powered trains with travel at top speeds ranging 

from 79 mph to 125 mph.

Train speed and train technology are classified into two categories. 

This train technology utilizes electric power delivered directly to the trainset 

via overhead catenary power lines. This Tier 1 EIS evaluated electric train 

technology with top speeds between 125 mph and 220 mph.

Operating speeds will vary along each Corridor Alternative depending on a range of factors such as: 

Topography (i.e. grade) | Geometry (i.e. curves) | Distance Between Stations

Dedicated Passenger Tracks vs. Tracks Shared with Freight Rail | Electric vs. Diesel Train Technology

The selection of speed and train technology is deferred until a Tier 2 study.

Top operating speeds cannot be reached on all portions of the corridor.

*Stock Photo by Bellena

*Source: Amtrak.com

Figure 10: Public Meeting Board #9
APPENDIX B 

Agency Comments on Draft Environmental Impact Statement 

1. Federal Government

A. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4

B. United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service

C. Federal Highway Administration

2. State Government

A. South Carolina Department of Transportation

B. North Carolina Department of Transportation 

C. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources 

D. North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources

E. South Carolina Department of Archives and History

F. Georgia Department of Natural Resources 

3. Local Government

A. City of Toccoa, GA

B. City of Tucker, GA

C. City of Suwanee, GA

D. City of Kings Mountain, NC

E. City of Charlotte, NC and the Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning 

Organization

4. Other

A. Atlanta Beltline, Inc. 

B. Tucker Northlake Community Improvement District 

C. Southern Environmental Law Center 

5. GDOT Response to Agency Comments 
1.FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY COMMENTS
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 4 

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 

61 FORSYTH STREET 

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 

NOV O 1 2019 

Mr. John Winkle 

Department of Transportation 

Federal Railroad Administration 

1200 New Jersey A venue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: EPA Review Comments on the Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Atlanta 

to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan; CEQ No. 20190225 

Dear Mr. Winkle: 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has reviewed the Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact 

Statement (DEIS) for the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan, developed by 

the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) in 

accordance with its responsibilities under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(C) of the 

National Environmental Policy Act. The purpose of the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor 

Investment Plan is to improve intercity passenger travel between the cities of Atlanta and Charlotte. The 

proposed expansion of the region's transportation system will improve trip time and reliability through 

highspeed passenger diesel or electric rail services. 

The EPA supports more sustainable approaches that address the region's growing traffic congestion. The 

DEIS evaluates three (3) corridors for passenger rail - the Southern Crescent Corridor, the 1-85 Corridor, 

and the Greenfield Corridor. A Preferred Corridor Alternative is not identified in the DEIS. According 

to the DEIS, the Preferred Corridor Alternative will be selected in the combined Tier 1 Final 

Environmental Impact Statement/Record of Decision (FEIS/ROD). 

The DEIS describes various planning-level scenarios, however, project-related impacts are not 

identified. The EPA recommends the examination of relevant environmental impacts in the FEIS/ROD 

or subsequent tiered documents, as appropriate (see enclosure). 

Should you have any questions concerning these comments or recommendations, please feel free to 

contact Ms. Amanetta Somerville at somerville.amanetta@epa.gov or (404) 562-9025. We appreciate 

the opportunity to comment on the proposed Tier l DEIS. 

Enclosure 

Sincerely, 

Ntale Kajumba 

Acting Chief, NEPA Section 

Strategic Programs Office 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed w,th Vegetable 011 Based Inks on Recycled Paper (M1n1mum 30% Postconsumer) 
ENCLOSURE 

Draft Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement 

Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan 

CEQ No. 20190225 

PROJECT DESCRIPTION 

The Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan will develop the Atlanta to Charlotte 

portion of the Southeast High-Speed Rail (SEHSR) Corridor initiative from Washington, DC to Atlanta, 

Georgia. The SEHSR Corridor is one of eleven U.S. Department of Transportation designated highspeed rail corridors in the country. The Atlanta to Charlotte corridor spans approximately 280 miles and 

connects the cities of Atlanta, Georgia, and Charlotte, North Carolina, in a general northeasterly 

direction. The study area includes the Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport and the proposed 

Charlotte Gateway Station. The study area generally follows I-20 (between Atlanta and Columbia), I-77 

(between Columbia and Charlotte), and the Norfolk Southern rail line (between Charlotte and Atlanta). 

It also contains I-85 between Charlotte and Atlanta as well as parts of surrounding metropolitan areas. 

DETAILED STUDY ALTERNATIVES 

Six preliminary alternatives were developed and evaluated during the early phases of the project studies. 

Three preliminary alternatives were eliminated because the purpose and need were not met. The three 

alternatives carried forward and evaluated in the Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) 

include the following: 

Southern Crescent Corridor 

The 268-m.ile Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative primarily follows the Norfolk Southern Piedmont 

Division right-of-way (ROW), which hosts the existing Amtrak Crescent long-distance service between 

Atlanta and Charlotte. This diesel alternative proposes sharing the ROW, with freight and passenger 

trains operating together on shared tracks in certain sections of the corridor and on separate tracks in 

others. This route will serve three stations in North Carolina at the Charlotte Gateway, Charlotte 

Douglas International Airport, and Gastonia; four stations in Spartanburg, Greer, Greenville, and 

Clemson, South Carolina; and six stations in Toccoa, Gainesville, Suwanee, Doraville, downtown 

Atlanta, and Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, Georgia. 

Interstate 85 Corridor 

The 255-mile diesel or electric I-85 Corridor Alternative is located primarily within the interstate 

highway ROW on a dedicated high-speed passenger rail alignment following I-85 between Gastonia, 

North Carolina, and Suwanee, Georgia. Then it follows a shared railroad ROW in the approaches to the 

Charlotte and Atlanta termini. This route serves three stations in North Carolina at the Charlotte 

Gateway, Charlotte Douglas International Airport, and Gastonia; three stations in South Carolina in 

Spartanburg, Greenville, and Anderson; and four stations in Georgia in Suwanee, Doraville, downtown 

Atlanta, and Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport. 

Greenfield Corridor 

The 274-rnile diesel or electric Greenfield Corridor Alternative is primarily on a new "greenfield" 

dedicated high-speed passenger rail alignment between Charlotte Douglas International Airport and 

Athens, Georgia. Then it follows shared railroad ROW in the approaches to the Charlotte and Atlanta 

termini. This route serves three stations in North Carolina at the Charlotte Gateway, Charlotte Douglas 

International Airport, and South Gastonia; two stations in South Carolina at Greenville-Spartanburg 
International Airport and Anderson; and five stations in Georgia in Athens, Suwanee, Doraville, 

downtown Atlanta, and Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport. 

GENERAL ENVIRONMENT AL ISSUES 

In Exhibit 0-6 of the Tier 1 DEIS, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and the Georgia 

Department of Transportation (GDOT) list performance measures by impact area which provides a brief 

but good overview of the impact areas. There is no definition or explanation of the parameters of High, 

Medium, and Low. 

Recommendation: The EPA recommends that the FEIS/ROD define or explain the parameters for High, 

Medi um, and Low impacts. 

Cumulative Impacts Analysis 

Cumulative impacts are not discussed in the DEIS. This examination of impacts is important for the 

evaluation of the three proposed alternatives. The Council for Environmental Quality's regulations 40 

CFR §§1500-1508 states direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts must be addressed and considered by 

Federal agencies in satisfying the requirements of EPA. Specifically, per 40 CFR §1508.7, "a 

cumulative impact is the impact on the environment, which results from the incremental impact of the 

action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of what 

agency (Federal or non-Federal) or person undertakes such other actions. Cumulative impacts can result 

from individually minor but collectively significant actions taking place over a period of time." 

Recommendation: The EPA recommends that the FEIS/ROD include a discussion of cumulative impacts 

that may result from the proposed high-speed rail corridor. 

ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACTS 

Environmental Justice 

Executive Order 12898, Federal Ac/ions to Address Environmenlal Justice in Minority and Low-Income 

Popu/aJions, directs federal agencies to identify and address disproportionately high and adverse effects 

of federal projects on the health or environment of minority and low-income populations to the greatest 

extent practicable. In section 3.6.3.2 of the DEIS, the proposed project will impact populations identified 

as minority and or low-income. The Tier 1 DEIS does not provide detailed information identifying the 

potentially impacted communities, and the methodology used to quantify the degree of impact. 

Recommendations: The EPA supports an alternative that maintains community continuity as well as 

minimizes disproportionately high and adverse effects of the proposed project on the health or 

environment of minority and or low-income populations. The EPA recommends that transportation 

agencies conduct a more in-depth evaluation of the potential transportation, and socioeconomic impacts 

of this project upon the local community in the FEIS/ROD. 

Air Quality 

The Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor traverses several counties that are nonattainment or 

maintenance for one or more of the ational Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) six criteria 

pollutants. The Atlanta area is comprised of Gwinnett, DeKalb, Fulton, and Clayton Counties, which are 

designated nonattainment for the 2015 8-hour ozone (0 3) standard. The Charlotte-Rock Hill, NC-SCarea, is comprised of Mecklenburg, Gaston, and York Counties is a maintenance area for the 2008 8-

hour 0 3 and 1997 0 3 standards. Additionally, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, is a maintenance 
area for Carbon Monoxide. Section 3.4.4.2 of the DEIS states that it is not likely that any alternative, 

regardless of the rail technology selected, will cause or contribute to an increase in the emission of 

criteria pollutants. However, the foundation ofthis conclusion is unclear, as the DEIS does not include 

the methodology used to quantify the degree of impact. 

Recommendation: The EPA recommends the FEIS/ROD include a more in-depth evaluation of the 

potential air quality impacts of the proposed project upon the corridor and the local community. 

General Conformity 

Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina have State Implementation Plans (SIP), developed under 

the Clean Air Act (CAA). Under the authority of the CAA, Federal entities are prohibited from taking 

actions in nonattainrnent or maintenance areas that do not conform to the SIP. The conformity analyses 

ensure that Federal activities do not interfere with established emissions budgets in the SIPs, that Federal 

activities do not cause or contribute to new violations, and that States achieve overall attainment and 

maintenance of the NAAQS. Section 3.4.2 of the DEIS states that the Tier 2 analysis will include a 

conformity determination and hot spot analysis where congestion is greatest or in areas of sensitive 

receptors. 

Recommendations: The EPA recommends that the FEIS/ROD expand the general conformity discussion 

to include a comparative analysis of each corridor's potential impact on conformity. 

Water Quality 

Section 3.9.3 of the DEIS discusses the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan 

impacts to water resources. The Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative generates the least amount of 

impacts with 30 acres of wetlands impacts, 55,697 linear feet of perennial streams impacts, 64,769 linear 

feet of intermittent streams impacts, and 397 acres of the 100-year floodplain impacts. The Interstate 85 

Corridor Alternative results in 135 acres of wetlands impacts, 106,414 linear feet of perennial streams 

impacts, 86,055 linear feet of intermittent streams impacts, and 686 acres of the 100-year floodplain 

impacts. The Greenfield Corridor Alternative result in 97 acres of wetlands impacts, 117,753 linear feet 

of perennial streams impacts; 149,889 linear feet of intermittent streams impacts; and 640 acres of the 

100-year floodplain impacts. 

Recommendations: The EPA recommends that the selected alternative minimize impacts to wetlands 

and streams to the maximum extent practicable. Where it is not practicable to avoid wetlands, consider 

measures to elevate the road and use end-on construction to the extent practicable to minimize impacts 

on wetlands associated with changes in hydrology and other adverse effects. 
United States Department of the Interior 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

RG Stephens, Jr. Federal Building 

355 East Hancock Avenue, Room 320

Athens, Georgia 30601

West Georgia Sub Office October 3, 2019

P.O. Box 52560 

Ft. Benning, Georgia 31995-2560 

Coastal Sub Office

4980 Wildlife Drive 

Townsend, Georgia 31331

Mr. Paul Nissenbaum Mr. Russell R. McMurry 

Associate Administrator, Railroad Policy and Dept Commissioner 

Federal Railroad Administration Georgia Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE, MS-20 One Georgia Center – 600 West Peachtree NW 

Washington, DC 20590 Atlanta, GA 30308 

ATTN: Kaycee Mertz and John Winkle 

RE: GDOT Project: Atlanta-Charlotte Passenger Rail; FWS Log 04EG1000-2020-TA-0046; ER 19/435

Dear Ms. Mertz and Mr Winkle: 

Please accept the following comments on the Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision for the 

proposed Atlanta-Charlotte High Speed Ground Transportation Project dated March 2019, on behalf of Georgia Ecological 

Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Please note for your files that Carrie Straight will be serving as Georgia 

Ecological Services’ contact for any future NEPA-related studies. 

Coordination History with Georgia Ecological Services: 

May 16, 2013. Federal Railroad Administration and Georgia Department of Transportation published a Notice of 

Intent to develop a Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail 

Corridor Investment Plan. The exact termini of alternative corridor routes have not yet been established and will 

be finalized as a part of the EIS scoping process, which also will address connectivity to proposed and existing 

passenger rail stations, airports, and other regional transportation services along the corridor. In particular, the 

project will consider connectivity between the proposed Georgia MultiModal Passenger Terminal (MMPT) and 

Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport in Atlanta, and between the proposed Charlotte Gateway Station 

and Charlotte-Douglas International Airport. 

May 16, 2013. Federal Railroad Administration submitted letters dated May 16, 2013 to the Department of the 

Interior and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southeast Regional Director inviting the Service to become a 

Participating Agencies in the Environmental Review Process for the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor 

Investment Plan. 

May 23, 2013. The Department of Interior concurred with their role as a participating agency.

September 20, 2019. The Georgia Ecological Field Office, Athens, GA, received notification from Headquarter U.S. 

Fish and Wildlife Service that a Tier 1 Draft EIS was available for environmental review. 

General Comments: 

As the proposed project design is developed, please consider assessing design measures to minimize impacts to terrestrial 

wildlife for any at-grade portions of the proposed alignments and impacts to birds and bats for any at-grade or above-grade

alignments, especially along commonly used flight paths and movement/migration corridors. It would be beneficial to 

conduct an analysis of potential mortality and fragmentation of habitat for species of concern that may be migratory or 

require unfragmented habitat for persistence on the landscape.

Please consider additional analyses for the Tier 2 NEPA related to any foreseeable indirect, cumulative, interrelated, and 

interdependent actions. This should include any related land use changes associated with stations, maintenance areas, 

storage areas, ancillary facilities, and other developments planned or included in state, county, municipal, or city planning 

documents for development along the proposed project alignment. This assessment should catalog likely changes in 

habitat or impervious surface in those areas relative to the baseline conditions. If the project is expected to require the 
September 30, 2019

Letter to Georgia Department of Transportation / Federal Railroad Administration

RE: GDOT Project Atlanta-Charlotte Passenger Rail

relocation of utility lines, other service lines, or existing facilities, please include the impacts (direct and indirect) on the 

listed species as a result of those impacts.

Our office looks forward to continued coordination during the development and analyses of the Tier 2 NEPA studies. We 

are happy to provide any assistance to assess impacts to federally-listed species along the Preferred Corridor Alternative 

and to develop avoidance and minimization options as the project progresses.

We would suggest that the project alignment shapefiles be uploaded into IPaC (Information for Planning and Consultation 

ecos.fes.gov/ipac) to update the species lists found in the tables for “Federal-Listed Protected Species” in Section 3 of the 

document. Because the information appears to be dated from 2014, some species are missing in the list, the status of some 

species have changed, and the states/counties have some inconsistencies. The project proponent can save these project files 

by logging into IPaC and will be able to quickly identify changes and other modifications to the species lists. We have 

attached current files from IPaC for the project using the Crescent, I-85 and Greenfield alignments. There are likely 

several species that are currently under review for listing under the authority of the Endangered Species Act that could 

require consultation in the future. Periodically using IPaC to check the species occurrences will help you develop the most 

up-to-date environmental document possible. In Georgia, an additional check on potential species occurring in the project 

alignment revealed only one species currently under review the tri-color bat (Perimyotis subflavus).

Additional information for consideration in the Final EIS or future environmental documentation for the project. 

Bats: Please assess any habitat (caves, forest, and existing infrastructure) that may be directly or indirectly impacted by the 

project to determine the level of consultation necessary with our agency, in addition to developing appropriate avoidance, 

minimization, and mitigation measures, if appropriate. Inspections of all bridges, culverts, and structures that could be 

impacted by the project to determine if the structure is being utilized as a roost by bats may help inform the risk to 

federally listed bats in the project area. In addition, in sensitive areas, vibrations or blasting from construction activities 

could impact protected bats and nearby roosts. Please assess the trade-offs of using traditional and alternative construction 

methods and time of day restrictions for driving piles and other activities with high noise or vibrations. Because Federal 

Railroad Administration is the lead federal agency for the project, the national programmatic agreement between Federal 

Highway Administration, Federal Railroad Administration and Federal Transit Administration and the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service for Indiana and northern long-eared bat may provide additional guidance and insight related to avoidance 

and minimization for projects impacting those species. Information on the programmatic agreement can be found here: 

https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/section7/fhwa/index.html. 

Aquatics: Federally and/or state-listed aquatic species could occur in the project area. These species are sensitive to 

sedimentation and changes in water quality. To protect water quality for both wildlife and human use / consumption, 

please consider methods to minimize disturbances to riparian buffers and for the protection of stream channels. The 

Service recommends use of erosion control practices, post construction stormwater management, and other best 

management practices to protect water quality.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the document. If you have any questions or require further 

information, please contact Georgia Ecological Service’s transportation liaison for the project area, Carrie Straight, at 706-

208-7508. 

Sincerely,

Donald W. Imm, Ph.D.

Field Supervisor
▪

October 03, 2019

United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

Georgia Ecological Services Field Office

355 East Hancock Avenue

Room 320

Athens, GA 30601

Phone: (706) 613-9493 Fax: (706) 613-6059

In Reply Refer To: 

Consultation Code: 04EG1000-2020-SLI-0039 

Event Code: 04EG1000-2020-E-00059 

Project Name: ATL-Charlotte Light Rail - I-85 alternative

Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project 

location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project

To Whom It May Concern:

This list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as critical 

habitat, that may be affected by your proposed project. This list may change before your project 

is completed. Under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the 

accuracy of this list should be verified after 90 days. The Service recommends that verification 

be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and 

implementation.

Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 

668 et seq.). Projects affecting these species may require development of an eagle conservation 

plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/eagle_guidance.html).

Wind energy projects should follow the wind energy guidelines http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/ 

for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and bats.

Guidance for minimizing impactsof communcation towers on migratory birds can be found 

under the "Bird Hazards" tab at: www.fws.gov/migratorybirds.

Attachment(s):

Official Species List
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EG1000-2020-E-00059   1

Official Species List

This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the 

requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether 

any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed 

action".

This species list is provided by:

Georgia Ecological Services Field Office

355 East Hancock Avenue

Room 320

Athens, GA 30601

(706) 613-9493

This project's location is within the jurisdiction of multiple offices. Expect additional species list 

documents from the following offices, and expect that the species and critical habitats in each 

document reflect only those that fall in the office's jurisdiction:

Asheville Ecological Services Field Office

160 Zillicoa Street

Asheville, NC 28801-1082

(828) 258-3939

South Carolina Ecological Services

176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200

Charleston, SC 29407-7558

(843) 727-4707
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EG1000-2020-E-00059   2

Project Summary

Consultation Code: 04EG1000-2020-SLI-0039

Event Code: 04EG1000-2020-E-00059

Project Name: ATL-Charlotte Light Rail - I-85 alternative

Project Type: TRANSPORTATION

Project Description: Review for Draft EIS of alternative routes for project.

Project Location:

Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://

www.google.com/maps/place/34.456293928771856N83.10250615438386W

Counties: Banks, GA | Barrow, GA | Clayton, GA | DeKalb, GA | Franklin, GA | Fulton, GA | 

Gwinnett, GA | Hart, GA | Jackson, GA | Cleveland, NC | Gaston, NC | 

Mecklenburg, NC | Anderson, SC | Cherokee, SC | Greenville, SC | Oconee, SC | 

Spartanburg, SC
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EG1000-2020-E-00059   3

1.

Endangered Species Act Species

There is a total of 7 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.

Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include 

species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species 

list because a project could affect downstream species.

IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA 

Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the 

Department of Commerce.

See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially 

within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office 

if you have questions.

NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an 

office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of 

Commerce.

Clams

NAME STATUS

Gulf Moccasinshell Medionidus penicillatus

There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7663

Endangered

Oval Pigtoe Pleurobema pyriforme

There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4132

Endangered

Purple Bankclimber (mussel) Elliptoideus sloatianus

There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7660

Threatened

Shinyrayed Pocketbook Lampsilis subangulata

There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6517

Endangered

1
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EG1000-2020-E-00059   4

Flowering Plants

NAME STATUS

Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217

Endangered

Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473

Endangered

Ferns and Allies

NAME STATUS

Black Spored Quillwort Isoetes melanospora

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6315

Endangered

Critical habitats

THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S 

JURISDICTION.
October 03, 2019

United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

South Carolina Ecological Services

176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200

Charleston, SC 29407-7558

Phone: (843) 727-4707 Fax: (843) 727-4218

http://www.fws.gov/charleston/

In Reply Refer To: 

Consultation Code: 04ES1000-2020-SLI-0009 

Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00016 

Project Name: ATL-Charlotte Light Rail - I-85 alternative

Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project 

location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project

To Whom It May Concern:

The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as 

well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your 

proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the 

requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the 

Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of 

species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to 

contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to 

federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical 

habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the 

Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be 

completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be 

completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and 

implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested 

through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.

The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the 

ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the 

Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to 

utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered 

species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or 

designated critical habitat.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00016   2

▪

▪

▪

A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having 

similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the 

human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) 

(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological 

evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may 

affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended 

contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.

If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that 

listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the 

agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service 

recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed 

within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 

consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered 

Species Consultation Handbook" at:

http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF

Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle 

Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require 

development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/ 

eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy 

guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and 

bats.

Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications 

towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http:// 

www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http:// 

www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/ 

comtow.html.

We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages 

Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project 

planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in 

the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project 

that you submit to our office.

Attachment(s):

Official Species List

USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries

Migratory Birds
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00016   1

Official Species List

This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the 

requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether 

any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed 

action".

This species list is provided by:

South Carolina Ecological Services

176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200

Charleston, SC 29407-7558

(843) 727-4707

This project's location is within the jurisdiction of multiple offices. Expect additional species list 

documents from the following offices, and expect that the species and critical habitats in each 

document reflect only those that fall in the office's jurisdiction:

Asheville Ecological Services Field Office

160 Zillicoa Street

Asheville, NC 28801-1082

(828) 258-3939

Georgia Ecological Services Field Office

355 East Hancock Avenue

Room 320

Athens, GA 30601

(706) 613-9493
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00016   2

Project Summary

Consultation Code: 04ES1000-2020-SLI-0009

Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00016

Project Name: ATL-Charlotte Light Rail - I-85 alternative

Project Type: TRANSPORTATION

Project Description: Review for Draft EIS of alternative routes for project.

Project Location:

Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://

www.google.com/maps/place/34.456293928771856N83.10250615438386W

Counties: Banks, GA | Barrow, GA | Clayton, GA | DeKalb, GA | Franklin, GA | Fulton, GA | 

Gwinnett, GA | Hart, GA | Jackson, GA | Cleveland, NC | Gaston, NC | 

Mecklenburg, NC | Anderson, SC | Cherokee, SC | Greenville, SC | Oconee, SC | 

Spartanburg, SC
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00016   3

1.

Endangered Species Act Species

There is a total of 13 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.

Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include 

species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species 

list because a project could affect downstream species.

IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA 

Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the 

Department of Commerce.

See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially 

within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office 

if you have questions.

NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an 

office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of 

Commerce.

Mammals

NAME STATUS

Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045

Threatened

Birds

NAME STATUS

Eastern Black Rail Laterallus jamaicensis ssp. jamaicensis

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10477

Proposed 

Threatened

Reptiles

NAME STATUS

Bog Turtle Clemmys muhlenbergii

Population: U.S.A. (GA, NC, SC, TN, VA)

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6962

Similarity of 

Appearance 

(Threatened)

1
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00016   4

Flowering Plants

NAME STATUS

Bunched Arrowhead Sagittaria fasciculata

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1720

Endangered

Dwarf-flowered Heartleaf Hexastylis naniflora

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2458

Threatened

Mountain Sweet Pitcher-plant Sarracenia rubra ssp. jonesii

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4283

Endangered

Persistent Trillium Trillium persistens

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3583

Endangered

Small Whorled Pogonia Isotria medeoloides

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1890

Threatened

Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473

Endangered

Swamp Pink Helonias bullata

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4333

Threatened

White Fringeless Orchid Platanthera integrilabia

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1889

Threatened

White Irisette Sisyrinchium dichotomum

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8097

Endangered

Lichens

NAME STATUS

Rock Gnome Lichen Gymnoderma lineare

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3933

Endangered
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00016   5

Critical habitats

THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S 

JURISDICTION.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00016   1

USFWS National Wildlife Refuge Lands And Fish 

Hatcheries

Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 

'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to 

discuss any questions or concerns.

THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00016   1

1.

2.

3.

Migratory Birds

Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle 

Protection Act .

Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to 

migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider 

implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.

The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.

The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.

50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)

The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS 

Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. 

To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see 

the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that 

every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders 

and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data 

mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For 

projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative 

occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional 

information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory 

bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found 

below.

For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures 

to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE 

SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and 

breeding in your project area.

NAME

BREEDING 

SEASON

Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus

This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention 

because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types 

of development or activities.

https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626

Breeds Sep 1 to 

Jul 31

Blue-winged Warbler Vermivora pinus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions 

(BCRs) in the continental USA

Breeds May 1 

to Jun 30

1

2
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00016   2

NAME

BREEDING 

SEASON

Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2974

Breeds Apr 28 

to Jul 20

Eastern Whip-poor-will Antrostomus vociferus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 1 

to Aug 20

Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 1 

to Jul 31

Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds Apr 1 to 

Jul 31

Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 10 

to Sep 10

Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds 

elsewhere

Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 10 

to Aug 31

Probability Of Presence Summary

The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be 

present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project 

activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the 

FAQ “Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report” before using or attempting 

to interpret this report.

Probability of Presence ( )

Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your 

project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week 

months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see 

below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher 

confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00016   3

1.

2.

3.

 probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data

How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:

The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in 

the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for 

that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee 

was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 

0.25.

To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of 

presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum 

probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence 

in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 

(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on 

week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.

The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical 

conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the 

probability of presence score.

Breeding Season ( )

Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across 

its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project 

area.

Survey Effort ( )

Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys 

performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of 

surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.

No Data ( )

A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.

Survey Timeframe

Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant 

information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on 

all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.

SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

Bald Eagle

Non-BCC Vulnerable
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00016   4

▪

▪

▪

SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

Blue-winged 

Warbler

BCC - BCR

Cerulean Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Eastern Whip-poorwill

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Prairie Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Prothonotary 

Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Red-headed 

Woodpecker

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Rusty Blackbird

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Wood Thrush

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Additional information can be found using the following links:

Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/

birds-of-conservation-concern.php

Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/

management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/

conservation-measures.php

Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/

management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf

Migratory Birds FAQ

Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts 

to migratory birds.

Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize 

impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly 

important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in 

the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very 

helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding 

in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or 

permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of 

infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.

What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified 

location?
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00016   5

1.

2.

The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern 

(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.

The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian 

Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, 

and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as 

occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as 

warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act

requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or 

development.

Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your 

project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list 

of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.

What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds 

potentially occurring in my specified location?

The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data 

provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing 

collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .

Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information 

becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and 

how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me 

about these graphs" link.

How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my 

project area?

To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, 

wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab 

of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of 

interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your 

migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your 

project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds 

elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.

What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?

Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:

"BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern 

throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, 

Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);

"BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation 

Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00016   6

3. "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on 

your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) 

potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities 

(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).

Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, 

in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC 

species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can 

implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, 

please see the FAQs for these topics.

Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects

For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species 

and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the 

Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides 

birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird 

model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical 

Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic 

Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.

Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use 

throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this 

information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study

and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.

What if I have eagles on my list?

If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid 

violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.

Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report

The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of 

birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for 

identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ “What does IPaC 

use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location”. Please be 

aware this report provides the “probability of presence” of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that 

overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look 

carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the “no 

data” indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey 

effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In 

contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of 

certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for 

identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might 

be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you 

know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement 

conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, 

should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ “Tell 
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00016   7

me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory 

birds” at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
October 03, 2019

United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

Asheville Ecological Services Field Office

160 Zillicoa Street

Asheville, NC 28801-1082

Phone: (828) 258-3939 Fax: (828) 258-5330

http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/countyfr.html

In Reply Refer To: 

Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2020-SLI-0005 

Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00017 

Project Name: ATL-Charlotte Light Rail - I-85 alternative

Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project 

location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project

To Whom It May Concern:

The attached species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as 

well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your 

proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. Although not required by 

section 7, many agencies request species lists to start the informal consultation process and begin 

their fulfillment of the requirements under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 

1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

This list, along with other helpful resources, is also available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service (Service) Asheville Field Office's (AFO) website: https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/

cntylist/nc_counties.html. The AFO website list includes “species of concern” species that could 

potentially be placed on the federal list of threatened and endangered species in the future. Also 

available are:

Design and Construction Recommendations 

https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project_review/Recommendations.html

Optimal Survey Times for Federally Listed Plants

https://www.fws.gov/nc-es/plant/plant_survey.html

Northern long-eared bat Guidance 

https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project_review/NLEB_in_WNC.html

Predictive Habitat Model for Aquatic Species

https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/Maxent/Maxent.html
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00017   2

New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of 

species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could require modifications of these lists. 

Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, 

the accuracy of the species lists should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be 

completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be 

completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website or the AFO website (the AFO website dates each 

county list with the day of the most recent update/change) at regular intervals during project 

planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be 

requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the 

enclosed list or by going to the AFO website.

The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the 

ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the 

Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to 

utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered 

species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or 

designated critical habitat.

A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having 

similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the 

human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) 

(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a Biological 

Evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may 

affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended 

contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12 and on our office's website 

at https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project_review/assessment_guidance.html.

If a Federal agency (or their non-federal representative) determines, based on the Biological 

Assessment or Biological Evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be 

affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 

50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species, and 

proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the 

regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license 

applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://

www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF.

Though the bald eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, please be aware 

that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 

U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require additional consultation (see 

https://www.fws.gov/southeast/our-services/permits/eagles/). Wind energy projects should follow 

the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to 

migratory birds (including bald and golden eagles) and bats.

Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications 

towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://

www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm;
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00017   3

▪

▪

▪

http://www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/

towers/comtow.html.

We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages 

Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project 

planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in 

the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project 

that you submit to our office.

Attachment(s):

Official Species List

Migratory Birds

Wetlands
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00017   1

Official Species List

This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the 

requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether 

any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed 

action".

This species list is provided by:

Asheville Ecological Services Field Office

160 Zillicoa Street

Asheville, NC 28801-1082

(828) 258-3939

This project's location is within the jurisdiction of multiple offices. Expect additional species list 

documents from the following offices, and expect that the species and critical habitats in each 

document reflect only those that fall in the office's jurisdiction:

Georgia Ecological Services Field Office

355 East Hancock Avenue

Room 320

Athens, GA 30601

(706) 613-9493

South Carolina Ecological Services

176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200

Charleston, SC 29407-7558

(843) 727-4707
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00017   2

Project Summary

Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2020-SLI-0005

Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00017

Project Name: ATL-Charlotte Light Rail - I-85 alternative

Project Type: TRANSPORTATION

Project Description: Review for Draft EIS of alternative routes for project.

Project Location:

Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://

www.google.com/maps/place/34.456293928771856N83.10250615438386W

Counties: Banks, GA | Barrow, GA | Clayton, GA | DeKalb, GA | Franklin, GA | Fulton, GA | 

Gwinnett, GA | Hart, GA | Jackson, GA | Cleveland, NC | Gaston, NC | 

Mecklenburg, NC | Anderson, SC | Cherokee, SC | Greenville, SC | Oconee, SC | 

Spartanburg, SC
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00017   3

1.

Endangered Species Act Species

There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.

Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include 

species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species 

list because a project could affect downstream species.

IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA 

Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the 

Department of Commerce.

See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially 

within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office 

if you have questions.

NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an 

office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of 

Commerce.

Mammals

NAME STATUS

Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045

Threatened

Clams

NAME STATUS

Carolina Heelsplitter Lasmigona decorata

There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3534

Endangered

1
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00017   4

Flowering Plants

NAME STATUS

Dwarf-flowered Heartleaf Hexastylis naniflora

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2458

Threatened

Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217

Endangered

Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849

Endangered

Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473

Endangered

Critical habitats

THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S 

JURISDICTION.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00017   1

1.

2.

3.

Migratory Birds

Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle 

Protection Act .

Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to 

migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider 

implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.

The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.

The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.

50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)

The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS 

Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. 

To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see 

the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that 

every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders 

and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data 

mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For 

projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative 

occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional 

information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory 

bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found 

below.

For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures 

to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE 

SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and 

breeding in your project area.

NAME

BREEDING 

SEASON

Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus

This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention 

because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types 

of development or activities.

https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626

Breeds Sep 1 to 

Jul 31

Blue-winged Warbler Vermivora pinus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions 

(BCRs) in the continental USA

Breeds May 1 

to Jun 30

1

2
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00017   2

NAME

BREEDING 

SEASON

Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2974

Breeds Apr 28 

to Jul 20

Eastern Whip-poor-will Antrostomus vociferus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 1 

to Aug 20

Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds Apr 20 

to Aug 20

Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 1 

to Jul 31

Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds Apr 1 to 

Jul 31

Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 10 

to Sep 10

Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds 

elsewhere

Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 10 

to Aug 31

Probability Of Presence Summary

The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be 

present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project 

activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the 

FAQ “Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report” before using or attempting 

to interpret this report.

Probability of Presence ( )

Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your 

project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week 

months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see 
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00017   3

1.

2.

3.

 probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data

below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher 

confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.

How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:

The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in 

the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for 

that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee 

was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 

0.25.

To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of 

presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum 

probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence 

in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 

(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on 

week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.

The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical 

conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the 

probability of presence score.

Breeding Season ( )

Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across 

its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project 

area.

Survey Effort ( )

Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys 

performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of 

surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.

No Data ( )

A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.

Survey Timeframe

Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant 

information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on 

all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00017   4

▪

▪

▪

SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

Bald Eagle

Non-BCC Vulnerable

Blue-winged 

Warbler

BCC - BCR

Cerulean Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Eastern Whip-poorwill

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Kentucky Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Prairie Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Prothonotary 

Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Red-headed 

Woodpecker

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Rusty Blackbird

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Wood Thrush

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Additional information can be found using the following links:

Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/

birds-of-conservation-concern.php

Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/

management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/

conservation-measures.php

Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/

management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf

Migratory Birds FAQ

Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts 

to migratory birds.

Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize 

impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly 

important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in 

the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very 

helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding 

in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or 
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00017   5

permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of 

infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.

What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified 

location?

The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern 

(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.

The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian 

Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, 

and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as 

occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as 

warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act

requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or 

development.

Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your 

project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list 

of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.

What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds 

potentially occurring in my specified location?

The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data 

provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing 

collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .

Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information 

becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and 

how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me 

about these graphs" link.

How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my 

project area?

To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, 

wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab 

of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of 

interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your 

migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your 

project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds 

elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.

What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00017   6

1.

2.

3.

Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:

"BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern 

throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, 

Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);

"BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation 

Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and

"Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on 

your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) 

potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities 

(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).

Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, 

in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC 

species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can 

implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, 

please see the FAQs for these topics.

Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects

For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species 

and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the 

Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides 

birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird 

model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical 

Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic 

Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.

Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use 

throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this 

information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study

and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.

What if I have eagles on my list?

If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid 

violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.

Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report

The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of 

birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for 

identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ “What does IPaC 

use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location”. Please be 

aware this report provides the “probability of presence” of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that 

overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look 

carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the “no 

data” indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey 

effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In 
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00017   7

contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of 

certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for 

identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might 

be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you 

know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement 

conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, 

should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ “Tell 

me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory 

birds” at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00017   1

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

Wetlands

Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 

404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.

For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers District.

Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to 

update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine 

the actual extent of wetlands on site.

FRESHWATER EMERGENT WETLAND

PEM1Fh

PEM1Ch

PEM1Kx

FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND

PFO1Ah

PFO1C

PSS1Ah

PSS1Ch

PSS1Cx

PFO1A

PSS1Fh

PFO1Ch

PSS1A

FRESHWATER POND

PUBHh

PUBHx

PUBKx

PUSCh

LAKE

L1UBHh

RIVERINE

R2UBH

R2UBHx

R4SBC

R5UBH
▪

October 03, 2019

United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

Georgia Ecological Services Field Office

355 East Hancock Avenue

Room 320

Athens, GA 30601

Phone: (706) 613-9493 Fax: (706) 613-6059

In Reply Refer To: 

Consultation Code: 04EG1000-2020-SLI-0043 

Event Code: 04EG1000-2020-E-00064 

Project Name: ATL-Charlotte Light Rail - Crescent alternative

Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project 

location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project

To Whom It May Concern:

This list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as critical 

habitat, that may be affected by your proposed project. This list may change before your project 

is completed. Under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the 

accuracy of this list should be verified after 90 days. The Service recommends that verification 

be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and 

implementation.

Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 

668 et seq.). Projects affecting these species may require development of an eagle conservation 

plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/eagle_guidance.html).

Wind energy projects should follow the wind energy guidelines http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/ 

for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and bats.

Guidance for minimizing impactsof communcation towers on migratory birds can be found 

under the "Bird Hazards" tab at: www.fws.gov/migratorybirds.

Attachment(s):

Official Species List
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EG1000-2020-E-00064   1

Official Species List

This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the 

requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether 

any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed 

action".

This species list is provided by:

Georgia Ecological Services Field Office

355 East Hancock Avenue

Room 320

Athens, GA 30601

(706) 613-9493

This project's location is within the jurisdiction of multiple offices. Expect additional species list 

documents from the following offices, and expect that the species and critical habitats in each 

document reflect only those that fall in the office's jurisdiction:

Asheville Ecological Services Field Office

160 Zillicoa Street

Asheville, NC 28801-1082

(828) 258-3939

South Carolina Ecological Services

176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200

Charleston, SC 29407-7558

(843) 727-4707
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EG1000-2020-E-00064   2

Project Summary

Consultation Code: 04EG1000-2020-SLI-0043

Event Code: 04EG1000-2020-E-00064

Project Name: ATL-Charlotte Light Rail - Crescent alternative

Project Type: TRANSPORTATION

Project Description: Review for Draft EIS of alternative routes for project. Co-use of Amtrak 

lines.

Project Location:

Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://

www.google.com/maps/place/34.460951337672924N83.5794532355338W

Counties: Banks, GA | Clayton, GA | DeKalb, GA | Fulton, GA | Gwinnett, GA | Habersham, 

GA | Hall, GA | Stephens, GA | Cleveland, NC | Gaston, NC | Mecklenburg, NC | 

Cherokee, SC | Greenville, SC | Oconee, SC | Pickens, SC | Spartanburg, SC
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EG1000-2020-E-00064   3

1.

Endangered Species Act Species

There is a total of 9 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.

Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include 

species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species 

list because a project could affect downstream species.

IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA 

Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the 

Department of Commerce.

See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially 

within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office 

if you have questions.

NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an 

office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of 

Commerce.

Mammals

NAME STATUS

Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045

Threatened

Clams

NAME STATUS

Gulf Moccasinshell Medionidus penicillatus

There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7663

Endangered

Oval Pigtoe Pleurobema pyriforme

There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4132

Endangered

Purple Bankclimber (mussel) Elliptoideus sloatianus

There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7660

Threatened

Shinyrayed Pocketbook Lampsilis subangulata

There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6517

Endangered

1
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EG1000-2020-E-00064   4

Flowering Plants

NAME STATUS

Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217

Endangered

Small Whorled Pogonia Isotria medeoloides

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1890

Threatened

Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473

Endangered

White Fringeless Orchid Platanthera integrilabia

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1889

Threatened

Critical habitats

THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S 

JURISDICTION.
October 03, 2019

United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

South Carolina Ecological Services

176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200

Charleston, SC 29407-7558

Phone: (843) 727-4707 Fax: (843) 727-4218

http://www.fws.gov/charleston/

In Reply Refer To: 

Consultation Code: 04ES1000-2020-SLI-0010 

Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00018 

Project Name: ATL-Charlotte Light Rail - Crescent alternative

Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project 

location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project

To Whom It May Concern:

The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as 

well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your 

proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the 

requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the 

Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of 

species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to 

contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to 

federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical 

habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the 

Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be 

completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be 

completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and 

implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested 

through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.

The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the 

ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the 

Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to 

utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered 

species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or 

designated critical habitat.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00018   2

▪

▪

▪

A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having 

similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the 

human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) 

(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological 

evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may 

affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended 

contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.

If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that 

listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the 

agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service 

recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed 

within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 

consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered 

Species Consultation Handbook" at:

http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF

Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle 

Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require 

development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/ 

eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy 

guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and 

bats.

Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications 

towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http:// 

www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http:// 

www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/ 

comtow.html.

We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages 

Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project 

planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in 

the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project 

that you submit to our office.

Attachment(s):

Official Species List

USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries

Migratory Birds
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00018   1

Official Species List

This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the 

requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether 

any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed 

action".

This species list is provided by:

South Carolina Ecological Services

176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200

Charleston, SC 29407-7558

(843) 727-4707

This project's location is within the jurisdiction of multiple offices. Expect additional species list 

documents from the following offices, and expect that the species and critical habitats in each 

document reflect only those that fall in the office's jurisdiction:

Asheville Ecological Services Field Office

160 Zillicoa Street

Asheville, NC 28801-1082

(828) 258-3939

Georgia Ecological Services Field Office

355 East Hancock Avenue

Room 320

Athens, GA 30601

(706) 613-9493
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00018   2

Project Summary

Consultation Code: 04ES1000-2020-SLI-0010

Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00018

Project Name: ATL-Charlotte Light Rail - Crescent alternative

Project Type: TRANSPORTATION

Project Description: Review for Draft EIS of alternative routes for project. Co-use of Amtrak 

lines.

Project Location:

Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://

www.google.com/maps/place/34.460951337672924N83.5794532355338W

Counties: Banks, GA | Clayton, GA | DeKalb, GA | Fulton, GA | Gwinnett, GA | Habersham, 

GA | Hall, GA | Stephens, GA | Cleveland, NC | Gaston, NC | Mecklenburg, NC | 

Cherokee, SC | Greenville, SC | Oconee, SC | Pickens, SC | Spartanburg, SC
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00018   3

1.

Endangered Species Act Species

There is a total of 12 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.

Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include 

species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species 

list because a project could affect downstream species.

IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA 

Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the 

Department of Commerce.

See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially 

within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office 

if you have questions.

NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an 

office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of 

Commerce.

Mammals

NAME STATUS

Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045

Threatened

Reptiles

NAME STATUS

Bog Turtle Clemmys muhlenbergii

Population: U.S.A. (GA, NC, SC, TN, VA)

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6962

Similarity of 

Appearance 

(Threatened)

1
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00018   4

Flowering Plants

NAME STATUS

Bunched Arrowhead Sagittaria fasciculata

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1720

Endangered

Dwarf-flowered Heartleaf Hexastylis naniflora

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2458

Threatened

Mountain Sweet Pitcher-plant Sarracenia rubra ssp. jonesii

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4283

Endangered

Persistent Trillium Trillium persistens

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3583

Endangered

Small Whorled Pogonia Isotria medeoloides

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1890

Threatened

Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473

Endangered

Swamp Pink Helonias bullata

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4333

Threatened

White Fringeless Orchid Platanthera integrilabia

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1889

Threatened

White Irisette Sisyrinchium dichotomum

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8097

Endangered

Lichens

NAME STATUS

Rock Gnome Lichen Gymnoderma lineare

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3933

Endangered
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00018   5

Critical habitats

THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S 

JURISDICTION.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00018   1

USFWS National Wildlife Refuge Lands And Fish 

Hatcheries

Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 

'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to 

discuss any questions or concerns.

THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00018   1

1.

2.

3.

Migratory Birds

Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle 

Protection Act .

Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to 

migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider 

implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.

The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.

The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.

50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)

The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS 

Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. 

To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see 

the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that 

every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders 

and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data 

mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For 

projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative 

occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional 

information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory 

bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found 

below.

For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures 

to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE 

SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and 

breeding in your project area.

NAME

BREEDING 

SEASON

Bachman's Sparrow Aimophila aestivalis

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6177

Breeds May 1 

to Sep 30

Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus

This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention 

because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types 

of development or activities.

https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626

Breeds Sep 1 to 

Jul 31

1

2
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00018   2

NAME

BREEDING 

SEASON

Blue-winged Warbler Vermivora pinus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions 

(BCRs) in the continental USA

Breeds May 1 

to Jun 30

Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2974

Breeds Apr 28 

to Jul 20

Eastern Whip-poor-will Antrostomus vociferus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 1 

to Aug 20

Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds Apr 20 

to Aug 20

King Rail Rallus elegans

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8936

Breeds May 1 

to Sep 5

Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 1 

to Jul 31

Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds Apr 1 to 

Jul 31

Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 10 

to Sep 10

Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds 

elsewhere

Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 10 

to Aug 31

Probability Of Presence Summary

The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be 

present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project 

activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the 
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00018   3

1.

2.

3.

FAQ “Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report” before using or attempting 

to interpret this report.

Probability of Presence ( )

Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your 

project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week 

months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see 

below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher 

confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.

How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:

The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in 

the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for 

that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee 

was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 

0.25.

To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of 

presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum 

probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence 

in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 

(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on 

week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.

The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical 

conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the 

probability of presence score.

Breeding Season ( )

Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across 

its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project 

area.

Survey Effort ( )

Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys 

performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of 

surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.

No Data ( )

A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.

Survey Timeframe

Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant 

information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on 

all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00018   4

▪

▪

▪

 probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data

SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

Bachman's Sparrow

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Bald Eagle

Non-BCC Vulnerable

Blue-winged 

Warbler

BCC - BCR

Cerulean Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Eastern Whip-poorwill

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Kentucky Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

King Rail

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Prairie Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Prothonotary 

Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Red-headed 

Woodpecker

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Rusty Blackbird

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Wood Thrush

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Additional information can be found using the following links:

Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/

birds-of-conservation-concern.php

Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/

management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/

conservation-measures.php

Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/

management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00018   5

Migratory Birds FAQ

Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts 

to migratory birds.

Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize 

impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly 

important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in 

the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very 

helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding 

in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or 

permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of 

infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.

What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified 

location?

The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern 

(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.

The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian 

Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, 

and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as 

occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as 

warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act

requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or 

development.

Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your 

project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list 

of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.

What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds 

potentially occurring in my specified location?

The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data 

provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing 

collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .

Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information 

becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and 

how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me 

about these graphs" link.

How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my 

project area?

To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, 

wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab 

of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of 
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00018   6

1.

2.

3.

interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your 

migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your 

project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds 

elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.

What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?

Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:

"BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern 

throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, 

Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);

"BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation 

Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and

"Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on 

your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) 

potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities 

(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).

Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, 

in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC 

species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can 

implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, 

please see the FAQs for these topics.

Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects

For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species 

and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the 

Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides 

birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird 

model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical 

Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic 

Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.

Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use 

throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this 

information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study

and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.

What if I have eagles on my list?

If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid 

violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.

Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report

The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of 

birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for 

identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ “What does IPaC 
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00018   7

use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location”. Please be 

aware this report provides the “probability of presence” of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that 

overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look 

carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the “no 

data” indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey 

effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In 

contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of 

certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for 

identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might 

be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you 

know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement 

conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, 

should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ “Tell 

me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory 

birds” at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
October 03, 2019

United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

Asheville Ecological Services Field Office

160 Zillicoa Street

Asheville, NC 28801-1082

Phone: (828) 258-3939 Fax: (828) 258-5330

http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/countyfr.html

In Reply Refer To: 

Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2020-SLI-0007 

Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00021 

Project Name: ATL-Charlotte Light Rail - Crescent alternative

Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project 

location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project

To Whom It May Concern:

The attached species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as 

well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your 

proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. Although not required by 

section 7, many agencies request species lists to start the informal consultation process and begin 

their fulfillment of the requirements under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 

1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

This list, along with other helpful resources, is also available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service (Service) Asheville Field Office's (AFO) website: https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/

cntylist/nc_counties.html. The AFO website list includes “species of concern” species that could 

potentially be placed on the federal list of threatened and endangered species in the future. Also 

available are:

Design and Construction Recommendations 

https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project_review/Recommendations.html

Optimal Survey Times for Federally Listed Plants

https://www.fws.gov/nc-es/plant/plant_survey.html

Northern long-eared bat Guidance 

https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project_review/NLEB_in_WNC.html

Predictive Habitat Model for Aquatic Species

https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/Maxent/Maxent.html
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00021   2

New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of 

species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could require modifications of these lists. 

Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, 

the accuracy of the species lists should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be 

completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be 

completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website or the AFO website (the AFO website dates each 

county list with the day of the most recent update/change) at regular intervals during project 

planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be 

requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the 

enclosed list or by going to the AFO website.

The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the 

ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the 

Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to 

utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered 

species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or 

designated critical habitat.

A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having 

similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the 

human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) 

(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a Biological 

Evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may 

affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended 

contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12 and on our office's website 

at https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project_review/assessment_guidance.html.

If a Federal agency (or their non-federal representative) determines, based on the Biological 

Assessment or Biological Evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be 

affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 

50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species, and 

proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the 

regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license 

applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://

www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF.

Though the bald eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, please be aware 

that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 

U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require additional consultation (see 

https://www.fws.gov/southeast/our-services/permits/eagles/). Wind energy projects should follow 

the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to 

migratory birds (including bald and golden eagles) and bats.

Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications 

towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://

www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm;
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00021   3

▪

▪

▪

http://www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/

towers/comtow.html.

We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages 

Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project 

planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in 

the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project 

that you submit to our office.

Attachment(s):

Official Species List

Migratory Birds

Wetlands
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00021   1

Official Species List

This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the 

requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether 

any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed 

action".

This species list is provided by:

Asheville Ecological Services Field Office

160 Zillicoa Street

Asheville, NC 28801-1082

(828) 258-3939

This project's location is within the jurisdiction of multiple offices. Expect additional species list 

documents from the following offices, and expect that the species and critical habitats in each 

document reflect only those that fall in the office's jurisdiction:

Georgia Ecological Services Field Office

355 East Hancock Avenue

Room 320

Athens, GA 30601

(706) 613-9493

South Carolina Ecological Services

176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200

Charleston, SC 29407-7558

(843) 727-4707
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00021   2

Project Summary

Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2020-SLI-0007

Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00021

Project Name: ATL-Charlotte Light Rail - Crescent alternative

Project Type: TRANSPORTATION

Project Description: Review for Draft EIS of alternative routes for project. Co-use of Amtrak 

lines.

Project Location:

Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://

www.google.com/maps/place/34.460951337672924N83.5794532355338W

Counties: Banks, GA | Clayton, GA | DeKalb, GA | Fulton, GA | Gwinnett, GA | Habersham, 

GA | Hall, GA | Stephens, GA | Cleveland, NC | Gaston, NC | Mecklenburg, NC | 

Cherokee, SC | Greenville, SC | Oconee, SC | Pickens, SC | Spartanburg, SC
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00021   3

1.

Endangered Species Act Species

There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.

Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include 

species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species 

list because a project could affect downstream species.

IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA 

Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the 

Department of Commerce.

See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially 

within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office 

if you have questions.

NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an 

office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of 

Commerce.

Mammals

NAME STATUS

Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045

Threatened

Clams

NAME STATUS

Carolina Heelsplitter Lasmigona decorata

There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3534

Endangered

1
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00021   4

Flowering Plants

NAME STATUS

Dwarf-flowered Heartleaf Hexastylis naniflora

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2458

Threatened

Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217

Endangered

Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849

Endangered

Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473

Endangered

Critical habitats

THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S 

JURISDICTION.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00021   1

1.

2.

3.

Migratory Birds

Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle 

Protection Act .

Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to 

migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider 

implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.

The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.

The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.

50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)

The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS 

Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. 

To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see 

the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that 

every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders 

and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data 

mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For 

projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative 

occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional 

information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory 

bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found 

below.

For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures 

to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE 

SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and 

breeding in your project area.

NAME

BREEDING 

SEASON

Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus

This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention 

because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types 

of development or activities.

https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626

Breeds Sep 1 to 

Jul 31

Blue-winged Warbler Vermivora pinus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions 

(BCRs) in the continental USA

Breeds May 1 

to Jun 30

1

2
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00021   2

NAME

BREEDING 

SEASON

Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2974

Breeds Apr 28 

to Jul 20

Eastern Whip-poor-will Antrostomus vociferus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 1 

to Aug 20

Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds Apr 20 

to Aug 20

Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 1 

to Jul 31

Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds Apr 1 to 

Jul 31

Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 10 

to Sep 10

Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds 

elsewhere

Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 10 

to Aug 31

Probability Of Presence Summary

The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be 

present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project 

activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the 

FAQ “Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report” before using or attempting 

to interpret this report.

Probability of Presence ( )

Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your 

project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week 

months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see 
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00021   3

1.

2.

3.

 probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data

below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher 

confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.

How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:

The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in 

the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for 

that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee 

was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 

0.25.

To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of 

presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum 

probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence 

in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 

(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on 

week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.

The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical 

conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the 

probability of presence score.

Breeding Season ( )

Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across 

its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project 

area.

Survey Effort ( )

Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys 

performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of 

surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.

No Data ( )

A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.

Survey Timeframe

Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant 

information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on 

all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00021   4

▪

▪

▪

SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

Bald Eagle

Non-BCC Vulnerable

Blue-winged 

Warbler

BCC - BCR

Cerulean Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Eastern Whip-poorwill

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Kentucky Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Prairie Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Prothonotary 

Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Red-headed 

Woodpecker

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Rusty Blackbird

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Wood Thrush

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Additional information can be found using the following links:

Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/

birds-of-conservation-concern.php

Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/

management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/

conservation-measures.php

Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/

management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf

Migratory Birds FAQ

Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts 

to migratory birds.

Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize 

impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly 

important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in 

the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very 

helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding 

in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or 
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00021   5

permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of 

infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.

What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified 

location?

The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern 

(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.

The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian 

Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, 

and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as 

occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as 

warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act

requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or 

development.

Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your 

project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list 

of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.

What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds 

potentially occurring in my specified location?

The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data 

provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing 

collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .

Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information 

becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and 

how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me 

about these graphs" link.

How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my 

project area?

To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, 

wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab 

of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of 

interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your 

migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your 

project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds 

elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.

What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00021   6

1.

2.

3.

Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:

"BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern 

throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, 

Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);

"BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation 

Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and

"Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on 

your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) 

potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities 

(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).

Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, 

in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC 

species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can 

implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, 

please see the FAQs for these topics.

Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects

For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species 

and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the 

Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides 

birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird 

model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical 

Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic 

Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.

Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use 

throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this 

information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study

and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.

What if I have eagles on my list?

If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid 

violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.

Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report

The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of 

birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for 

identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ “What does IPaC 

use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location”. Please be 

aware this report provides the “probability of presence” of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that 

overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look 

carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the “no 

data” indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey 

effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In 
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00021   7

contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of 

certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for 

identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might 

be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you 

know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement 

conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, 

should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ “Tell 

me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory 

birds” at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00021   1

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

Wetlands

Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 

404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.

For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers District.

Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to 

update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine 

the actual extent of wetlands on site.

FRESHWATER EMERGENT WETLAND

PEM1Fh

PEM1Ch

FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND

PFO1Ah

PFO1C

PSS1Ch

PFO1A

PSS1Fh

PFO1Ch

PSS1A

FRESHWATER POND

PUBHh

PUBHx

PUBKx

PUSAx

PUSCh

LAKE

L1UBHh

RIVERINE

R4SBC

R5UBH

R2UBH

R2UBHx
▪

October 03, 2019

United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

Georgia Ecological Services Field Office

355 East Hancock Avenue

Room 320

Athens, GA 30601

Phone: (706) 613-9493 Fax: (706) 613-6059

In Reply Refer To: 

Consultation Code: 04EG1000-2020-SLI-0038 

Event Code: 04EG1000-2020-E-00067 

Project Name: ATL-Charlotte Light Rail - Greenfield alternative

Subject: Updated list of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed 

project location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project

To Whom It May Concern:

This list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as critical 

habitat, that may be affected by your proposed project. This list may change before your project 

is completed. Under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the 

accuracy of this list should be verified after 90 days. The Service recommends that verification 

be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and 

implementation.

Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 

668 et seq.). Projects affecting these species may require development of an eagle conservation 

plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/eagle_guidance.html).

Wind energy projects should follow the wind energy guidelines http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/ 

for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and bats.

Guidance for minimizing impactsof communcation towers on migratory birds can be found 

under the "Bird Hazards" tab at: www.fws.gov/migratorybirds.

Attachment(s):

Official Species List
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EG1000-2020-E-00067   1

Official Species List

This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the 

requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether 

any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed 

action".

This species list is provided by:

Georgia Ecological Services Field Office

355 East Hancock Avenue

Room 320

Athens, GA 30601

(706) 613-9493

This project's location is within the jurisdiction of multiple offices. Expect additional species list 

documents from the following offices, and expect that the species and critical habitats in each 

document reflect only those that fall in the office's jurisdiction:

Asheville Ecological Services Field Office

160 Zillicoa Street

Asheville, NC 28801-1082

(828) 258-3939

South Carolina Ecological Services

176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200

Charleston, SC 29407-7558

(843) 727-4707
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EG1000-2020-E-00067   2

Project Summary

Consultation Code: 04EG1000-2020-SLI-0038

Event Code: 04EG1000-2020-E-00067

Project Name: ATL-Charlotte Light Rail - Greenfield alternative

Project Type: TRANSPORTATION

Project Description: Review for Draft EIS of alternative routes for project.

Project Location:

Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://

www.google.com/maps/place/34.43460289121052N82.58827868188004W

Counties: Barrow, GA | Clarke, GA | Clayton, GA | DeKalb, GA | Elbert, GA | Fulton, GA | 

Gwinnett, GA | Hart, GA | Jackson, GA | Madison, GA | Gaston, NC | Mecklenburg, 

NC | Anderson, SC | Cherokee, SC | Greenville, SC | Laurens, SC | Spartanburg, SC | 

Union, SC | York, SC
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EG1000-2020-E-00067   3

1.

Endangered Species Act Species

There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.

Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include 

species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species 

list because a project could affect downstream species.

IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA 

Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the 

Department of Commerce.

See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially 

within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office 

if you have questions.

NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an 

office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of 

Commerce.

Clams

NAME STATUS

Gulf Moccasinshell Medionidus penicillatus

There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7663

Endangered

Oval Pigtoe Pleurobema pyriforme

There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4132

Endangered

Purple Bankclimber (mussel) Elliptoideus sloatianus

There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7660

Threatened

Shinyrayed Pocketbook Lampsilis subangulata

There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6517

Endangered

Flowering Plants

NAME STATUS

Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217

Endangered

1
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EG1000-2020-E-00067   4

Ferns and Allies

NAME STATUS

Black Spored Quillwort Isoetes melanospora

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6315

Endangered

Critical habitats

THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S 

JURISDICTION.
October 03, 2019

United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

South Carolina Ecological Services

176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200

Charleston, SC 29407-7558

Phone: (843) 727-4707 Fax: (843) 727-4218

http://www.fws.gov/charleston/

In Reply Refer To: 

Consultation Code: 04ES1000-2020-SLI-0008 

Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00019 

Project Name: ATL-Charlotte Light Rail - Greenfield alternative

Subject: Updated list of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed 

project location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project

To Whom It May Concern:

The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as 

well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your 

proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the 

requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the 

Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of 

species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to 

contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to 

federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical 

habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the 

Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be 

completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be 

completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and 

implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested 

through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.

The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the 

ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the 

Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to 

utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered 

species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or 

designated critical habitat.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00019   2

▪

▪

▪

A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having 

similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the 

human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) 

(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological 

evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may 

affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended 

contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.

If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that 

listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the 

agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service 

recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed 

within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 

consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered 

Species Consultation Handbook" at:

http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF

Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle 

Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require 

development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/ 

eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy 

guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and 

bats.

Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications 

towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http:// 

www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http:// 

www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/ 

comtow.html.

We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages 

Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project 

planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in 

the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project 

that you submit to our office.

Attachment(s):

Official Species List

USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries

Migratory Birds
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00019   1

Official Species List

This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the 

requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether 

any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed 

action".

This species list is provided by:

South Carolina Ecological Services

176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200

Charleston, SC 29407-7558

(843) 727-4707

This project's location is within the jurisdiction of multiple offices. Expect additional species list 

documents from the following offices, and expect that the species and critical habitats in each 

document reflect only those that fall in the office's jurisdiction:

Asheville Ecological Services Field Office

160 Zillicoa Street

Asheville, NC 28801-1082

(828) 258-3939

Georgia Ecological Services Field Office

355 East Hancock Avenue

Room 320

Athens, GA 30601

(706) 613-9493
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00019   2

Project Summary

Consultation Code: 04ES1000-2020-SLI-0008

Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00019

Project Name: ATL-Charlotte Light Rail - Greenfield alternative

Project Type: TRANSPORTATION

Project Description: Review for Draft EIS of alternative routes for project.

Project Location:

Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://

www.google.com/maps/place/34.43460289121052N82.58827868188004W

Counties: Barrow, GA | Clarke, GA | Clayton, GA | DeKalb, GA | Elbert, GA | Fulton, GA | 

Gwinnett, GA | Hart, GA | Jackson, GA | Madison, GA | Gaston, NC | Mecklenburg, 

NC | Anderson, SC | Cherokee, SC | Greenville, SC | Laurens, SC | Spartanburg, SC | 

Union, SC | York, SC
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00019   3

1.

Endangered Species Act Species

There is a total of 16 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.

Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include 

species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species 

list because a project could affect downstream species.

IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA 

Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the 

Department of Commerce.

See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially 

within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office 

if you have questions.

NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an 

office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of 

Commerce.

Mammals

NAME STATUS

Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045

Threatened

Birds

NAME STATUS

Eastern Black Rail Laterallus jamaicensis ssp. jamaicensis

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10477

Proposed 

Threatened

Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614

Endangered

1
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00019   4

Reptiles

NAME STATUS

Bog Turtle Clemmys muhlenbergii

Population: U.S.A. (GA, NC, SC, TN, VA)

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6962

Similarity of 

Appearance 

(Threatened)

Clams

NAME STATUS

Carolina Heelsplitter Lasmigona decorata

There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3534

Endangered
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00019   5

Flowering Plants

NAME STATUS

Bunched Arrowhead Sagittaria fasciculata

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1720

Endangered

Dwarf-flowered Heartleaf Hexastylis naniflora

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2458

Threatened

Little Amphianthus Amphianthus pusillus

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6445

Threatened

Mountain Sweet Pitcher-plant Sarracenia rubra ssp. jonesii

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4283

Endangered

Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849

Endangered

Small Whorled Pogonia Isotria medeoloides

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1890

Threatened

Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473

Endangered

Swamp Pink Helonias bullata

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4333

Threatened

White Fringeless Orchid Platanthera integrilabia

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1889

Threatened

White Irisette Sisyrinchium dichotomum

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8097

Endangered

Lichens

NAME STATUS

Rock Gnome Lichen Gymnoderma lineare

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3933

Endangered
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00019   6

Critical habitats

THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S 

JURISDICTION.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00019   1

USFWS National Wildlife Refuge Lands And Fish 

Hatcheries

Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 

'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to 

discuss any questions or concerns.

THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00019   1

1.

2.

3.

Migratory Birds

Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle 

Protection Act .

Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to 

migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider 

implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.

The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.

The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.

50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)

The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS 

Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. 

To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see 

the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that 

every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders 

and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data 

mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For 

projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative 

occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional 

information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory 

bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found 

below.

For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures 

to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE 

SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and 

breeding in your project area.

NAME

BREEDING 

SEASON

Bachman's Sparrow Aimophila aestivalis

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6177

Breeds May 1 to 

Sep 30

Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus

This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention 

because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types 

of development or activities.

https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626

Breeds Sep 1 to 

Jul 31

1

2
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00019   2

NAME

BREEDING 

SEASON

Blue-winged Warbler Vermivora pinus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions 

(BCRs) in the continental USA

Breeds May 1 to 

Jun 30

Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2974

Breeds Apr 28 

to Jul 20

Eastern Whip-poor-will Antrostomus vociferus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 1 to 

Aug 20

Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds Apr 20 

to Aug 20

Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 1 to 

Jul 31

Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds Apr 1 to 

Jul 31

Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 10 

to Sep 10

Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds 

elsewhere

Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 10 

to Aug 31

Probability Of Presence Summary

The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be 

present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project 

activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the 

FAQ “Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report” before using or attempting 

to interpret this report.

Probability of Presence ( )
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00019   3

1.

2.

3.

 probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data

Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your 

project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week 

months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see 

below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher 

confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.

How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:

The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in 

the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for 

that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee 

was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 

0.25.

To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of 

presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum 

probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence 

in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 

(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on 

week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.

The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical 

conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the 

probability of presence score.

Breeding Season ( )

Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across 

its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project 

area.

Survey Effort ( )

Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys 

performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of 

surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.

No Data ( )

A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.

Survey Timeframe

Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant 

information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on 

all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00019   4

▪

▪

▪

SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

Bachman's Sparrow

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Bald Eagle

Non-BCC Vulnerable

Blue-winged 

Warbler

BCC - BCR

Cerulean Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Eastern Whip-poorwill

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Kentucky Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Prairie Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Prothonotary 

Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Red-headed 

Woodpecker

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Rusty Blackbird

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Wood Thrush

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Additional information can be found using the following links:

Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/

birds-of-conservation-concern.php

Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/

management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/

conservation-measures.php

Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/

management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf

Migratory Birds FAQ

Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts 

to migratory birds.

Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize 

impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly 

important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in 

the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very 

helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding 
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00019   5

in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or 

permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of 

infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.

What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified 

location?

The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern 

(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.

The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian 

Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, 

and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as 

occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as 

warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act

requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or 

development.

Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your 

project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list 

of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.

What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds 

potentially occurring in my specified location?

The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data 

provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing 

collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .

Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information 

becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and 

how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me 

about these graphs" link.

How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my 

project area?

To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, 

wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab 

of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of 

interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your 

migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your 

project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds 

elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.

What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00019   6

1.

2.

3.

Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:

"BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern 

throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, 

Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);

"BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation 

Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and

"Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on 

your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) 

potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities 

(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).

Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, 

in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC 

species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can 

implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, 

please see the FAQs for these topics.

Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects

For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species 

and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the 

Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides 

birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird 

model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical 

Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic 

Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.

Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use 

throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this 

information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study

and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.

What if I have eagles on my list?

If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid 

violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.

Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report

The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of 

birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for 

identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ “What does IPaC 

use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location”. Please be 

aware this report provides the “probability of presence” of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that 

overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look 

carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the “no 

data” indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey 

effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In 
October 03, 2019

United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

Asheville Ecological Services Field Office

160 Zillicoa Street

Asheville, NC 28801-1082

Phone: (828) 258-3939 Fax: (828) 258-5330

http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/countyfr.html

In Reply Refer To: 

Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2020-SLI-0004 

Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00022 

Project Name: ATL-Charlotte Light Rail - Greenfield alternative

Subject: Updated list of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed 

project location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project

To Whom It May Concern:

The attached species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as 

well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your 

proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. Although not required by 

section 7, many agencies request species lists to start the informal consultation process and begin 

their fulfillment of the requirements under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 

1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

This list, along with other helpful resources, is also available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service (Service) Asheville Field Office's (AFO) website: https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/

cntylist/nc_counties.html. The AFO website list includes “species of concern” species that could 

potentially be placed on the federal list of threatened and endangered species in the future. Also 

available are:

Design and Construction Recommendations 

https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project_review/Recommendations.html

Optimal Survey Times for Federally Listed Plants

https://www.fws.gov/nc-es/plant/plant_survey.html

Northern long-eared bat Guidance 

https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project_review/NLEB_in_WNC.html

Predictive Habitat Model for Aquatic Species

https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/Maxent/Maxent.html
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00022   2

New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of 

species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could require modifications of these lists. 

Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, 

the accuracy of the species lists should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be 

completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be 

completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website or the AFO website (the AFO website dates each 

county list with the day of the most recent update/change) at regular intervals during project 

planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be 

requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the 

enclosed list or by going to the AFO website.

The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the 

ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the 

Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to 

utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered 

species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or 

designated critical habitat.

A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having 

similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the 

human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) 

(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a Biological 

Evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may 

affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended 

contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12 and on our office's website 

at https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project_review/assessment_guidance.html.

If a Federal agency (or their non-federal representative) determines, based on the Biological 

Assessment or Biological Evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be 

affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 

50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species, and 

proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the 

regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license 

applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://

www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF.

Though the bald eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, please be aware 

that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 

U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require additional consultation (see 

https://www.fws.gov/southeast/our-services/permits/eagles/). Wind energy projects should follow 

the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to 

migratory birds (including bald and golden eagles) and bats.

Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications 

towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://

www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm;
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00022   3

▪

▪

▪

http://www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/

towers/comtow.html.

We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages 

Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project 

planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in 

the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project 

that you submit to our office.

Attachment(s):

Official Species List

Migratory Birds

Wetlands
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00022   1

Official Species List

This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the 

requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether 

any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed 

action".

This species list is provided by:

Asheville Ecological Services Field Office

160 Zillicoa Street

Asheville, NC 28801-1082

(828) 258-3939

This project's location is within the jurisdiction of multiple offices. Expect additional species list 

documents from the following offices, and expect that the species and critical habitats in each 

document reflect only those that fall in the office's jurisdiction:

Georgia Ecological Services Field Office

355 East Hancock Avenue

Room 320

Athens, GA 30601

(706) 613-9493

South Carolina Ecological Services

176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200

Charleston, SC 29407-7558

(843) 727-4707
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00022   2

Project Summary

Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2020-SLI-0004

Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00022

Project Name: ATL-Charlotte Light Rail - Greenfield alternative

Project Type: TRANSPORTATION

Project Description: Review for Draft EIS of alternative routes for project.

Project Location:

Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://

www.google.com/maps/place/34.43460289121052N82.58827868188004W

Counties: Barrow, GA | Clarke, GA | Clayton, GA | DeKalb, GA | Elbert, GA | Fulton, GA | 

Gwinnett, GA | Hart, GA | Jackson, GA | Madison, GA | Gaston, NC | Mecklenburg, 

NC | Anderson, SC | Cherokee, SC | Greenville, SC | Laurens, SC | Spartanburg, SC | 

Union, SC | York, SC
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00022   3

1.

Endangered Species Act Species

There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.

Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include 

species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species 

list because a project could affect downstream species.

IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA 

Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the 

Department of Commerce.

See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially 

within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office 

if you have questions.

NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an 

office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of 

Commerce.

Mammals

NAME STATUS

Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045

Threatened

Clams

NAME STATUS

Carolina Heelsplitter Lasmigona decorata

There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3534

Endangered

1
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00022   4

Flowering Plants

NAME STATUS

Dwarf-flowered Heartleaf Hexastylis naniflora

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2458

Threatened

Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217

Endangered

Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849

Endangered

Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata

No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473

Endangered

Critical habitats

THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S 

JURISDICTION.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00022   1

1.

2.

3.

Migratory Birds

Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle 

Protection Act .

Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to 

migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider 

implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.

The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.

The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.

50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)

The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS 

Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. 

To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see 

the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that 

every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders 

and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data 

mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For 

projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative 

occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional 

information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory 

bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found 

below.

For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures 

to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE 

SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and 

breeding in your project area.

NAME

BREEDING 

SEASON

Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus

This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention 

because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types 

of development or activities.

https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626

Breeds Sep 1 to 

Jul 31

Blue-winged Warbler Vermivora pinus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions 

(BCRs) in the continental USA

Breeds May 1 

to Jun 30

1

2
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00022   2

NAME

BREEDING 

SEASON

Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2974

Breeds Apr 28 

to Jul 20

Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds Apr 20 

to Aug 20

Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 1 

to Jul 31

Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds Apr 1 to 

Jul 31

Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 10 

to Sep 10

Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds 

elsewhere

Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina

This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA 

and Alaska.

Breeds May 10 

to Aug 31

Probability Of Presence Summary

The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be 

present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project 

activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the 

FAQ “Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report” before using or attempting 

to interpret this report.

Probability of Presence ( )

Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your 

project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week 

months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see 

below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher 

confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00022   3

1.

2.

3.

 probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data

How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:

The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in 

the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for 

that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee 

was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 

0.25.

To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of 

presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum 

probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence 

in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 

(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on 

week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.

The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical 

conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the 

probability of presence score.

Breeding Season ( )

Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across 

its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project 

area.

Survey Effort ( )

Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys 

performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of 

surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.

No Data ( )

A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.

Survey Timeframe

Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant 

information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on 

all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.

SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

Bald Eagle

Non-BCC Vulnerable
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00022   4

▪

▪

▪

SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

Blue-winged 

Warbler

BCC - BCR

Cerulean Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Kentucky Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Prairie Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Prothonotary 

Warbler

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Red-headed 

Woodpecker

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Rusty Blackbird

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Wood Thrush

BCC Rangewide (CON)

Additional information can be found using the following links:

Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/

birds-of-conservation-concern.php

Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/

management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/

conservation-measures.php

Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/

management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf

Migratory Birds FAQ

Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts 

to migratory birds.

Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize 

impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly 

important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in 

the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very 

helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding 

in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or 

permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of 

infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.

What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified 

location?
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00022   5

1.

2.

The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern 

(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.

The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian 

Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, 

and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as 

occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as 

warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act

requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or 

development.

Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your 

project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list 

of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.

What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds 

potentially occurring in my specified location?

The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data 

provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing 

collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .

Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information 

becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and 

how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me 

about these graphs" link.

How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my 

project area?

To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, 

wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab 

of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of 

interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your 

migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your 

project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds 

elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.

What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?

Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:

"BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern 

throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, 

Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);

"BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation 

Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00022   6

3. "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on 

your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) 

potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities 

(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).

Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, 

in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC 

species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can 

implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, 

please see the FAQs for these topics.

Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects

For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species 

and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the 

Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides 

birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird 

model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical 

Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic 

Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.

Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use 

throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this 

information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study

and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.

What if I have eagles on my list?

If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid 

violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.

Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report

The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of 

birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for 

identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ “What does IPaC 

use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location”. Please be 

aware this report provides the “probability of presence” of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that 

overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look 

carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the “no 

data” indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey 

effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In 

contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of 

certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for 

identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might 

be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you 

know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement 

conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, 

should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ “Tell 
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00022   7

me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory 

birds” at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-00022   1

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

▪

Wetlands

Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 

404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.

For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers District.

Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to 

update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine 

the actual extent of wetlands on site.

FRESHWATER EMERGENT WETLAND

PEM1Fh

PEM1Ch

FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND

PSS1Ch

PFO1A

PSS1Fh

PFO1Ch

PFO1C

PSS1A

PSS1/3A

PFO1Ah

PSS1C

FRESHWATER POND

PUBHh

PUSCh

PUBHx

LAKE

L1UBHh

L2USCh

RIVERINE

R5UBH

R2UBH

R4SBC

R2UBHx

R4SBA
10/03/2019 Event Code: 04ES1000-2020-E-00019   7

contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of 

certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for 

identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might 

be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you 

know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement 

conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, 

should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ “Tell 

me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory 

birds” at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

2.STATE GOVERNMENT AGENCY COMMENTS

 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

ROY COOPER J. ERIC BOYETTE

GOVERNOR SECRETARY

Mailing Address:

NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

RAIL DIVISION

1553 MAIL SERVICE CENTER

RALEIGH, NC 27699-1553

Telephone: 919-707-4700

Fax: 919-715-6580

Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968

Website: ncdot.gov

Location:

1 S. WILMINGTON STREET

RALEIGH, NC 27601

April 15, 2020

Ms. Kaycee Mertz

Intermodal Planning and Environmental Manager

Division of Intermodal

Georgia Department of Transportation

600 West Peachtree Street

Atlanta, Georgia 30308

Dear Ms. Mertz:

Thank you for your continued coordination with the North Carolina Department of Transportation 

Rail Division on the Atlanta to Charlotte Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). As 

you are aware, NCDOT provided comments during our conference call held on January 10, 2020. 

Additional comments in this letter are intended to supplement those previously provided.

As we understand, the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) and South Carolina 

Department of Transportation (SCDOT) both support the Greenfield Alignment as the preferred 

alternative. NCDOT concurs with the Greenfield Alignment as the preferred alternative, provided 

additional studies are conducted as a part of the Tier 2 NEPA process to determine how the

Greenfield Alignment can best access the Charlotte / Metrolina region. 

If you have any questions, or would like to discuss this in more detail, please either contact Eddie 

McFalls at ebmcfalls@ncdot.gov (919) 707-4727 or me at jorthner@ncdot.gov (919) 707-4714. 

Sincerely,

Jason Orthner, PE

Rail Director

cc: Julie White, Deputy Secretary for Multi-Modal Transportation

James Bridges, PE, Manager, Planning and Development Branch

Eddie McFalls, PE, Planning Consultant, Planning and Development Branch
Robert H. Boyles, Jr.

Interim Director

Lorianne Riggin

Director, Office of

Environmental Programs

 

South Carolina Department of 

Natural Resources 

1000 Assembly Street Suite 336

PO Box 167

Columbia, SC 29202

803.734.3282

mixong@dnr.sc.gov

November 4, 2019

Kaycee Mertz, Project Manager

Division of Intermodal

Georgia Department of Transportation

One Georgia Center – 600 West Peachtree NW

Atlanta, Georgia 30308

Electronic submission

RE: Atlanta-Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan

Draft Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement

Dear Ms. Mertz,

Personnel with the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR) have reviewed the 

Draft Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the proposed project and offer the 

following comments.

Project Description

The United States Department of Transportation - Federal Railroad Administration (USDOT-FRA) in 

cooperation with the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) is preparing a DEIS for the 

Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan. The purpose of the project is to 

improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region’s 

transportation system capacity and improving trip time and reliability through highspeed passenger 

rail services. GDOT has selected three build alternatives and a no-build alternative for further 

evaluation in the Tier 1 EIS process. The Southern Crescent Alternative is a 268-mile route that 

primarily follows the existing Norfolk Southern right-of-way (ROW) across South Carolina. The 

Interstate 85 Alternative is 255-miles in length and is located primarily within the Interstate 85 

ROW. The Greenfield Corridor Alternative is a 274-mile route primarily located on a new alignment 

across the state.

Agency Comments

The environmental impacts associated with the construction of major railways and associated 

facilities can be substantial. Impacts associated with rail corridor construction include habitat loss

and fragmentation, increased impervious surfaces, loss of wetlands and prime farmland,

stormwater runoff and wildlife mortality resulting from collisions. An adequate evaluation of the 

environmental consequences of rail projects requires consideration for the direct, indirect and 
2

cumulative impacts of project activities as well as a comprehensive review of all alternative 

alignments and other means for avoiding and minimizing project impacts. 

The three proposed build alternatives will each cross six major river watersheds in the Piedmont 

ecoregion of South Carolina. This includes the Savannah, Saluda, Enoree, Tyger, Pacolet and Broad 

Rivers as well as numerous tributaries, wetlands and riparian areas. The proposed Southern 

Crescent and Interstate 85 alternatives will also cross Lake Hartwell at multiple locations. SCDNR is 

particularly concerned that the proposed Greenfield alternative will cross both an existing 

mitigation bank and a proposed mitigation bank as indicated in Appendix A, Part 7 (Greenfield 

Corridor Alternative and NS Approach Map Book). Portions of the existing Big Generostee Creek 

Mitigation Bank are located in the project corridor near SC Highway 187 in Anderson County as 

shown on page 26 of 55. The project corridor crosses the proposed Minkum Creek Mitigation Bank 

including the main stem and several tributaries of Minkum Creek in Cherokee County as shown on 

page 45 of 55. For more information regarding potential impacts to these mitigation banks as well 

as to jurisdictional streams and wetlands, please consult with the Charleston District of the U.S. 

Army Corps of Engineers.

The Greenfield alternative will cross the Broad Scenic River Corridor as shown on page 46 of 55 in 

the corridor map book referenced above. This crossing is approximately one-half mile downstream 

of the 99 Islands Dam on the Broad River. A 15-mile segment of the Broad River between Cherokee 

and York counties was designated a State Scenic River in May 1991 by the South Carolina General 

Assembly. The designation extends from Ninety-Nine Islands Dam to the confluence with the 

Pacolet River. The Broad Scenic River presents an undeveloped riverfront of Piedmont forests and 

pasturelands. The riparian forest is home to diverse plant and animal life. Eagles, ospreys, and other 

birds frequent the river corridor. The area surrounding the river is rich with historical features 

including Smith's ford and Native American fish traps. More information is available on South 

Carolina’s designated scenic rivers at http://www.dnr.sc.gov/water/river/index.html.

The DEIS states that preliminary data indicates suitable habitat potentially occurs within the 

screening area counties for multiple protected species that are federally listed and/or listed by the 

states. These species are listed by county in Exhibits 3.10-4 through 3.10-12. South Carolina also 

maintains records of State Wildlife Action Plan (SWAP) species. SWAP species are those species of 

greatest conservation need not traditionally covered under any federally funded programs. Species 

are listed in the SWAP because they are rare or designated as at-risk due to knowledge deficiencies; 

species common in South Carolina but listed rare or declining elsewhere; or species that serve as 

indicators of detrimental environmental conditions. More information is available on South Carolina 

SWAP species at http://dnr.sc.gov/swap/species2015.html.

All the proposed build corridors will involve work in areas designated as prime farmland and 

farmlands of statewide importance. The Greenfield alternative appears to involve large areas of 

prime farmland. Prime farmland is land that has the best combination of physical and chemical 

characteristics for producing food, feed, forage, fiber, and oilseed crops. It has the soil quality, 

growing season, and moisture supply needed to produce economically sustained high yields of 

crops when treated and managed according to acceptable farming methods. SCDNR recommends 

that impacts to prime farmland be avoided where practicable and that unavoidable impacts be 

minimized. We recommend that consultation occur with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) 

Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) per the Farmland Protection Policy Act.
3

SCDNR recommends that the following guidelines be considered in the development of a Tier 2 EIS 

and in future project planning efforts.

• Railway routes should utilize existing disturbance corridors where practicable to avoid and 

minimize impacts to wetlands, streams and waterbodies and limit habitat fragmentation.

• All crossings of wetlands, streams and waterbodies must be made with appropriately sized 

bridges and/or culverts. The use of bridging should be maximized.

• Structures crossing navigable waters should be designed to provide adequate clearance for 

commercial and pleasure craft. All structures should allow for the unimpeded passage of 

migrating fishes and other wildlife and designed to prevent alteration of the natural stream 

morphology. 

• SCDNR prefers that arched or bottomless culverts are utilized; however, if using boxed 

culverts or pipes, the bottom elevation of the culvert or pipe must be at or below the 

stream bed elevation to allow for natural migration of aquatic organisms up- and 

downstream. 

• Where feasible, disturbed river and stream banks and lake shoreline areas should be 

restored by using bioengineering techniques for stabilization.

• The use of existing fill areas or embankments for causeways or access roads should be 

maximized. To the maximum extent possible, median and right-of- way widths should be 

reduced to minimize impacts to wetlands and streams.

• A thorough review of impacts related to the construction of access roads should include 

potential impacts resulting from development of the land parcel to be accessed. Secondary

development stemming from access road construction could result in additional impacts to 

wetland and stream systems and inhabiting wildlife and should be considered in the overall 

review of the project.

• Care should be taken in the design of railways and associated structures to minimize direct 

drainage of runoff into adjacent water bodies. Stormwater management techniques such as 

grassed swales, vegetative buffers or retention/detention basins should be implemented 

during construction and upon project completion. Embankments should be stabilized to 

minimize erosion and water quality degradation.

• Review of railway projects should consider the impacts on locally designated scenic 

highways and on other aesthetic considerations (e.g., enhancement and protection of scenic 

vista and preservation of unique tree canopies and other natural areas).

• Access to streams, rivers, wetlands and other aquatic habitats for construction should not 

involve the use of filled causeways or excavated canals. The use of construction mats for 

access is preferred. Encroachment into aquatic habitats should be avoided when possible 

and otherwise, limited.

• SCDNR prefers and recommends the use of native warm season grasses and/or other native 

forbs that would be beneficial for wildlife and pollinators for stabilization and cover in 

disturbed areas. Native warm season grass species suggestions include: indiangrass 

(Sorghastrum nutans), big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii) and little bluestem 

(Schizachyrium scoparium). A list of beneficial pollinator plant species, such as milkweed 

(Asclepias spp.), may be found at www.xerces.org/pollinators-southeast-region/ or at 

http://www.pollinator.org/guides. For planting details of quantities and timing, we 

recommend reaching out to the USDA NRCS Soil & Water Conservation Offices.

• The project must comply with any applicable local floodplain, stormwater, land disturbance, 

or riparian buffer ordinances. 
4

These technical comments are submitted to speak to the general impacts of the activities as 

described through inquiry by parties outside the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. 

These technical comments are submitted as guidance to be considered and are not submitted as 

final agency comments that might be related to any unspecified local, state or federal permit, 

certification or license applications that may be needed by any applicant or their contractors, 

consultants or agents presently under review or not yet made available for public review. In 

accordance with its policy 600.01, Comments on Projects Under Department Review, the South 

Carolina Department of Natural Resources, reserves the right to comment on any permit, 

certification or license application that may be published by any regulatory agency which may 

incorporate, directly or by reference, these technical comments. Interested parties are to 

understand that SCDNR may provide a final agency position to regulatory agencies if any local, state 

or federal permit, certification or license applications may be needed by any applicant or their 

contractors, consultants or agents. 

Thank you for the opportunity to review this project and provide comments. Should you have any 

questions or need more information, please do not hesitate to contact me by email at 

mixong@dnr.sc.gov or by phone at 803.734.3282.

Sincerely,

Greg Mixon

Office of Environmental Programs
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources

State Historic Preservation Office

Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator

Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History 

Secretary Susi H. Hamilton Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry 

Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: (919) 807-6570/807-6599

October 21, 2019

Georgia Department of Transportation AtlantaCharlotteHSP@dot.ga.gov

Division of Intermodal

Attn: Kaycee Mertz, Project Manager

1 Georgia Center

600 W Peachtree Street NW

Atlanta, GA 30308

Re: Tier 1 DEIS, Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan, Mecklenburg County, 

ER 13-1015

Dear Ms. Mertz:

We are in receipt of the announcement of publication of the Tier 1 DEIS for the above-referenced 

undertaking. We have reviewed the materials presented and concur that the corridors selected for further study 

in Tier 2 appear to be appropriate within the State of North Carolina. We will look forward to coordinating 

with GDOT as it undertakes the additional, in-depth studies.

Please send all future correspondence on this matter to Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Ramona M. 

Bartos at 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-4617 or, preferably, by email to: 

environmental.review@ncdcr.gov. You will get an autoreply from that address to let you know that we got 

your request for review/comments and will respond accordingly. As we are a “one-stop” cultural/historic 

resources shop, we will ensure that above/below ground and submerged resources are considered by our staffs.

Multiple previously recorded sites were identified along the three proposed corridor routes. Two of the 

proposed routes, Southern Crescent and I-85, would mostly be collocated within existing railroad or interstate 

ROWs and would likely have minimal impacts to eligible or unrecorded, but potentially eligible, archaeological 

resources. The Greenfield alternative, however, would extend through areas that have received little systematic 

survey and appear to contain landforms that have a high probability for archaeological sites. 

An archaeological survey of portions of the APE may well be recommended depending on the specific 

alternative that is selected. We, therefore, look forward to reviewing the APE of preferred alternative as the 

planning progresses and more information about areas of ground disturbance are identified.

Given our experience with the Richmond to Charlotte section of the Southeastern High Speed Rail projects, 

we would also expect that additional architectural survey work will be needed within the APE once a Preferred 

Corridor is selected.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the 

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR 

Part 800.

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment, 

contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579 or 

environmental.review@ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above 

referenced tracking number.

Sincerely,

Ramona M. Bartos

Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
October 17, 2019 

Kaycee Mertz, Project Manager 

One Georgia Center 

600 West Peachtree Street NW 

Atlanta, GA 30308 

 Re: Tier 1 DEIS for the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan 

 SHPO Project No. 13-SS0011

Dear Kaycee Mertz: 

Our office has received the letter containing a thumb drive with the Draft Environmental Impact 

Statement documents dated September 12th on September 24th that you submitted as part of your agency’s 

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process for the project referenced above. This letter is for 

preliminary, informational purposes only and does not constitute consultation or agency coordination with 

our office as defined in 36 CFR 800: “Protection of Historic Properties” or by any state regulatory 

process. If The Federal Railroad Administration chooses to substitute the NEPA process for the process 

outlined in Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, your agency must notify our office of 

the proposed substitution. 

Our office maintains several resources for identifying historic properties (for links please see our online 

research resources at 

https://scdah.sc.gov/sites/default/files/Documents/Historic%20Preservation%20(SHPO)/ResearchResources.pdf). These resources in particular should assist your agency in identifying historic properties 

for NEPA scoping. 

• ArchSite is an online Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping program that includes all 

known historic and archaeological sites in South Carolina. Information on both the Public View 

Map and Subscriber View Map of ArchSite can be found here: http://www.scarchsite.org. 

• SC Historic Properties Record (SCHPR) includes information on all National Register of Historic 

Places listings, and historic property surveys (in process) at http://schpr.sc.gov/. 

• Additional historic contexts, survey reports, and related historic property documents can be found 

here https://scdah.sc.gov/historic-preservation/historic-properties-research/historic-contextssurvey-reports. 

The State Historic Preservation Office will provide comments regarding historic properties and effects to 

them once the federal or state agency initiates consultation. Project Review Forms and additional 

guidance regarding our office’s role in the compliance process and historic preservation can be found on 

our website at: https://scdah.sc.gov/historic-preservation/programs/review-compliance. 
We request that I, Joseph E. Wilkinson, be made the primary contact in our office for this project. 

Please refer to SHPO Project Number 13-SS0011 in any future correspondence regarding this project. If 

you have any questions, please contact me at (803) 896-6184 or at jwilkinson@scdah.sc.gov. 

Sincerely, 

_________________________________ 

Joseph E. Wilkinson 

Review Coordinator for Transportation Projects 

State Historic Preservation Office

_________________________________ 
October 8, 2019 

Carol L. Comer 

Director, Division of Intermodal 

Georgia Department of Transportation 

One Georgia Center 

600 West Peachtree Street NW 

Atlanta, Georgia 30308 

Attn: Kaycee Mertz, Project Manager 

RE: Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan 

 Statewide, Georgia 

HP-150721-003 

Dear Ms. Comer: 

The Historic Preservation Division (HPD) has received additional information concerning the above 

referenced project requesting comments pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA). Our comments are offered to assist the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and its 

applicants in complying with the provisions of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 

1966, as amended (NHPA). 

 

Thank you for notifying us of this federal undertaking. We look forward to receiving Section 106 

compliance documentation, as appropriate. If the federal agency intends to utilize NEPA to comply with 

Section 106, in lieu of the procedures set forth in 36 CFR Part 800, the FRA should notify HPD and the 

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation of its intent. 

Please refer to project number HP 150721-003 in future correspondence regarding this project. If we 

may be of further assistance, please contact me at (770) 389-7851 or Jennifer.dixon@dnr.ga.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Jennifer Dixon, MHP, LEED Green Associate 

Program Manager 

Environmental Review & Preservation Planning 

Sincerely, 
3.LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY COMMENTS







Charlotte ∙ Cornelius ∙ Davidson ∙ Fairview ∙ Huntersville ∙ Indian Trail ∙ Iredell County ∙ Marshville ∙ Marvin ∙ Matthews ∙ Mecklenburg County

Metropolitan Transit Commission ∙ Mineral Springs ∙ Mint Hill ∙ Monroe ∙ Mooresville ∙ NCDOT-Division 10 ∙ NCDOT-Division 12 ∙ Pineville

Stallings ∙ Statesville ∙ Troutman ∙ Union County ∙ Waxhaw ∙ Weddington ∙ Wesley Chapel ∙ Wingate

charlottenc.gov 600 East Fourth Street, Charlotte, NC 28202 crtpo.org

Kaycee Mertz

Rail and Transit Planning Manager

Georgia Department of Transportation

Division of Intermodal

600 West Peachtree St. NW

Atlanta, GA 30308

Dear Ms. Mertz:

The following comments are provided on the draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the 

Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan and were developed jointly by the 

Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization (CRTPO) and the Charlotte Department of 

Transportation (CDOT). The comments are not listed in any order of importance.

1. The document refers to five MPOs being located with the study area. There are seven. Please 

ensure the Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln MPO (GCLMPO) and the Rock Hill/Ft. Mill Area 

Transportation Study (RFATS) are identified in the final EIS.

2. The document refers to the Mecklenburg-Union Metropolitan Planning Organization. The MPO 

for the Charlotte region was renamed the Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning 

Organization (CRTPO) in 2013. The final EIS should make the correction.

3. Three distinct corridor alternatives are identified. Will the Tier 2 process be flexible and allow 

for the consideration of a hybrid option? For example, a combination of the Greenfield Corridor 

and the I-85 Corridor. 

4. The Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS) is preparing to move into the design phase for the 

proposed Silver Line that will provide service to Charlotte Douglas International Airport. The 

Silver Line will closely parallel the project’s sole alternative in Charlotte, particularly near the 

Airport. 

5. The Centralina Council of Governments (CCOG) is scheduled to begin a regional transit study

before the end of 2019 that will involve multiple counties in North Carolina and South Carolina, 

including three in the study area: Mecklenburg and Gaston in North Carolina and York in South 

Carolina. The Tier 2 phase of this project should account for this major initiative. 

6. The DEIS does not appear to analyze land use impacts of the Greenfield Corridor. Will the Tier 2 

analysis do so?

7. Should it be assumed that the Greenfield Corridor will not include at-grade crossings?

8. Will the Tier 2 analysis provide an indirect and cumulative impacts assessment?

Timothy Gibbs, AICP

Charlotte Department of Transportation

tgibbs@charlottenc.gov

Robert W. Cook, AICP

Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning 

Organization

rwcook@charlottenc.gov
4.OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCY COMMENTS
From: Shaun Green <SGreen@atlbeltline.org> 

Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 12:58 PM 

To: AtlantaCharlotteHSR 

Cc: Henry Ikwut-Ukwa 

Subject: ATL to Charlotte Passenger Rail Tier 1 DEIS 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless 

you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 

Kaycee: 

 

I appreciate you accepting these comments from ABI... 

 

? There are no trail nor transit projects listed within the Georgia section of the Planned and 

Committed Projects list (Exhibit 2-7). 

o MARTA/Atlanta BeltLine previously performed a Tier 1 EIS, with a ROD issued in 2012. 

o The BeltLine program of projects is within Atlanta’s Transportation Plan, both trail and 

transit. 

o ABI and PATH Foundation have built and will build more local-funding only trail 

segments. Please do not ignore the BeltLine corridor because its entirety is not in the 

RTP. 

? The proposed Tier 1 DEIS is carrying forward passenger rail alignments within the “Atlanta 

Approach” that are in the NSR and CSX Corridors, to get to the Western Railroad Trunk via 

Howell Interlock. 

o As the corridor width is set at 600’, a lot of the same dirt that we are contemplating is 

being contemplated by this DEIS. 

o Do not preclude Atlanta BeltLine (or Clifton Corridor) within the expected overlapping 

geographies. 

? Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. will soon advertise a procurement for a trail and transit alternatives 

analysis and feasibility study. Generally, this will be looking at the Atlanta BeltLine corridor 

between MARTA Bankhead Station and MARTA Lindbergh Station (or from about 9 o’clock to 1 

o’clock on the BeltLine). 

? Atlanta BeltLine Inc. is happy to work with you to try to further all of these projects. 

 

 

thanks, 

-sg 

 

Shaun Green, PE

Senior Transportation Engineer

Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. 

Office: 404.477.3667 // sgreen@atlbeltline.org // beltline.org

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Visit // Explore // GetInvolved // Programs // Events

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. // 100 Peachtree Street NW, Suite 2300 Atlanta, GA 30303

 

 
Tucker-Northlake CID | 3350 Northlake Pkwy Atlanta GA 30345 | 678-939-8947

Monday November 4, 2019

Commissioner Russell R. McMurry 

Georgia Department of Transportation

One Georgia Center 

600 West Peachtree NW Atlanta GA 30308 

Re: Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Greenfield Corridor with the CSX Atlanta approach) 

Dear Commissioner McMurry, 

Thank you for your support in sponsoring the Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the 

Southeast High-Speed Rail (SEHSR) route from Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport to 

Charlotte, North Carolina. 

Kaycee Mertz and her team at the Public Information Open House in Atlanta were helpful in 

communicating the goals of the projects as well as the limitations. The documents online were also helpful 

in understanding the scope and potential of the project. Particularly the Greenfield Corridor with the CSX 

Atlanta approach. 

Stations in Athens, Lawrenceville, and Tucker make sense for Georgia. The CSX route also passes through

the Emory University campus. Placing commuter rail along this corridor shifts the focus from decades of 

a top-end centric investment pattern, to one that connects two of the state’s largest and most well-known 

academic institutions. 

Between the two, the proposed stations in Tucker and Lawrenceville make sense. The Northlake District 

in Tucker has access to I-285 from three exits, the MMIP includes direct access to the express lane system

from Northlake Parkway, and the I-285 Top End Transit Study proposes a BRT/Express bus station along 

Northlake Parkway. Commuter rail would be a natural fit. From a regional perspective, a station in Tucker 

makes more sense than duplicating existing rail access to Hartsfield-Jackson from Doraville. 

If the Tucker-Northlake CID can be of any assistance in helping fund Tier 2 of the study, please let me 

know. 

Sincerely, 

_______________________________ 

Matthew R. Lee

Executive Director, Tucker-Northlake CID 

mlee@tuckernorthlake.com

incerely,

_______________________________

Matthew 
1 

November 4, 2019 

Ms. Kaycee Mertz 

Rail Planning Manager 

Georgia Department of Transportation BY EMAIL 

600 West Peachtree Street, NW 

Atlanta, GA 

Re: Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan Tier 1 Draft EIS 

Dear Ms. Mertz: 

 The Southern Environmental Law Center would like to provide the following comments 

on the Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger 

Rail Corridor Investment Plan. SELC is a non-partisan, non-profit organization that works 

throughout the Southeast to promote transportation and land use decisions that strengthen our 

communities, protect our environment, and improve our quality of life. 

 SELC strongly supports the proposed Southeast High Speed Rail Corridor, and we have 

previously participated in environmental studies for a number of other segments of this regional 

plan. Improving intercity passenger rail in the Southeast is critical to make rail more competitive 

with automobile and air travel, and would provide significant economic and community benefits 

in expanding travel options, reducing emissions of greenhouse gases and other pollutants, and 

promoting more efficient land use patterns throughout the region. 

Enhancing passenger rail service between Atlanta and Charlotte would be particularly 

beneficial due to the substantial growth in population, employment, and traffic projected in the 

study area between these cities in the coming years. However, the Tier 1 Draft EIS makes clear 

that identifying a preferred corridor for these improvements will be a complex decision, 

involving important tradeoffs between the relative economic and travel benefits, capital and 

other costs, and environmental and community impacts of the proposed alternatives. 

 In our comments below, we highlight some of the key issues that must be considered in 

making this decision and identify some areas in which additional analysis may be needed in this 

Tier 1 study before a preferred corridor is selected. Based on the mixed results of each of the 

proposed corridor alternatives in the Draft EIS in terms of benefits, costs, and impacts, this 

includes further review of potential “hybrid” options that incorporate elements of multiple 

alternatives. We also flag a number of issues that will warrant particular attention in the future 

Tier 2 EIS or other detailed studies that may be conducted as this project moves forward. 
2 

I. Benefits of Enhanced Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail 

 The study area includes some of the fastest-growing cities in the Southeast, and 

significant additional population and employment growth is projected in the near future.1

 Given 

this estimated growth, it is not surprising that the Draft EIS also projects marked increases in 

traffic volumes and congestion in the study area’s interstate corridors—including failing levels of 

service along much of the I-85 corridor despite the highway being 10 to 14 lanes wide in some 

areas.2

 Enhancing passenger rail service in the study area would help to alleviate this congestion 

and provide several other important benefits, including expanding travel options, encouraging 

more efficient land development patterns, and reducing transportation-related emissions of 

greenhouse gases and other air pollutants. 

The Draft EIS estimates that the proposed corridor alternatives would greatly improve 

passenger rail travel times between Atlanta and Charlotte,3

 making rail a much more competitive 

alternative to automobile and air travel and diverting significant traffic from these other modes. 

It appears the greatest benefits in this respect would result from the Greenfield and I-85 corridor 

alternatives, which are expected to have the highest travel speeds and ridership,4

 while not 

having to compete with freight rail services (as would be the case for the Southern Crescent 

alternative utilizing the existing Norfolk Southern line). By 2050, the Draft EIS estimates that the 

Greenfield alternative would divert 4.3 million automobile trips each year from the study area’s 

highways, the I-85 alternative would divert 3.9 million auto trips, and the Southern Crescent 

option would divert 1 million auto trips.5 The Draft EIS also estimates that the higher-speed I-85 

and Greenfield alternatives would respectively divert 8% and 10% of all air trips between 

Atlanta and Charlotte by 2050.6 

 In addition to reducing automobile and air travel delays, increasing the share of passenger 

rail in the study area would reduce transportation-related emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) 

and other air pollutants. The transportation sector is now the nation’s largest contributor of GHG 

emissions, and several study area localities remain in Clean Air Act “nonattainment” or 

“maintenance” areas for criteria pollutants.7

 As a result, we note and support the inclusion of a 

specific element to “improve energy efficiency and air quality” in the Draft EIS’s purpose and 

need statement, as well as recognition elsewhere in the document of the benefits passenger rail 

can provide in meeting this need.8 It will be crucial that the Final EIS and/or Tier 2 study include 

a comprehensive analysis of the project’s anticipated effects on GHG and other air pollutant 

emissions in the study area, including analysis specific to the choice between diesel or electric 

locomotive technology. 

 

1

 For example, the population of Atlanta is projected to grow by 44% and Charlotte is projected to grow by 61% 

from 2010/2015 to 2040/2045—adding over 3 million people in these two metro areas. Draft EIS at 1-19. 

2 Id. at 3-14 to 3-15. 

3

 The Draft EIS reports that the current average travel time of Amtrak’s Crescent service between Atlanta and 

Charlotte is 5 hours and 17 minutes, compared to estimated travel times of 2:06-2:44 for the Greenfield alternative, 

2:42-2:50 for the I-85 alternative, and 4:35-5:34 for the Southern Crescent alternative. See id. at 1-23 & 0-10. 4 Id. at 2-42. 5 Id. at 3-36. 

6 Id. at 3-40 to 3-41. 7 Id. at 3-46. 

8 Id. at 1-27 to 1-28. 
3 

II. Environmental and Community Impacts

The Draft EIS indicates that each of the proposed corridor alternatives includes many 

communities and important environmental, historic, and cultural resources that warrant careful 

consideration in selecting a preferred corridor in this EIS and further study in a Tier 2 EIS or 

other future reviews completed for the project. 

 

A. Natural Resource Impacts 

Although the large scale of the environmental screening areas identified for the corridor 

alternatives make it inevitable that each will include many natural resources, there appear to be 

significant differences in the level of potential impacts between alternatives. For instance, 

potential impacts to aquatic resources in the study area—including wetlands, streams, and 

floodplains—are generally far greater for the Greenfield and I-85 corridor alternatives than the 

Southern Crescent route along the existing Norfolk Southern alignment.9

 The Greenfield 

alternative also has the potential to impact far more natural habitat than the other options under 

review.10 We urge you to carefully consider these potential effects in selecting a preferred 

corridor alternative, as well as any available options to avoid or minimize impacts to these 

resources in more detailed future studies. 

Moreover, across all corridor alternatives the Draft EIS indicates that the CSX Atlanta 

Approach option is expected to result in much greater impacts to aquatic resources and natural 

habitat than the Norfolk Southern Approach. For example, potential wetlands impacts from the 

Southern Crescent alternative increase from 45 acres following the Norfolk Southern Approach 

to 100 acres under the CSX Approach option, with similar increases for the Greenfield and I-85 

alternatives and various other natural resource types.11 While we understand that a decision on 

the preferred Atlanta approach option is planned to be deferred to the Tier 2 study, these initial 

results raise major questions about the CSX Atlanta Approach that will need to be addressed 

before this option is advanced any further. 

B. Impacts to Communities and Historic and Cultural Resources 

The Draft EIS similarly shows that each of the proposed corridors include a substantial 

number of communities and historic and cultural resources, including many block groups that 

qualify as minority or low-income environmental justice communities.12 While enhanced 

passenger rail service would benefit many study area residents, it also has the potential to cause 

adverse effects from increased noise and vibration, visual impacts, and in some cases, more 

direct property and relocation impacts. Careful consideration is needed of these potential impacts 

in selecting a preferred corridor for this project, and of any available options to avoid or 

 

9 See id. at 3-9 to 3-10. For example, for the Norfolk Southern Atlanta approach options, the Southern Crescent 

alternative has the potential to impact 45 acres of wetlands versus 130 acres for the Greenfield alternative and 148 

acres for the I-85 alternative. Id. at 3-10. 

10 Id. 11 See id. at 3-9 to 3-10. 12 Id.; see also id. at 3-70. 
4 

minimize these impacts in a future Tier 2 study and in the development of the project’s specific 

alignment and design. 

III. Further Consideration of Alternatives

The results of the Draft EIS analysis present difficult questions about the relative benefits 

and drawbacks of the proposed corridor alternatives. Quite simply, there are some significant 

benefits and serious problems with each alternative. The I-85 and Greenfield alternatives would 

produce the greatest benefits in terms of increased passenger rail speeds, ridership, and revenue, 

as well as reducing greenhouse gas emissions and other air pollutants; yet these options would 

result in greater impacts to many natural resources and would be far more expensive to build.13

According to the Draft EIS, the I-85 alternative would be particularly costly due to the 

challenges involved with constructing new passenger rail lines around—and within the footprint 

of—the existing interstate.14 In contrast, the Southern Crescent alternative would be much less 

expensive and could be accommodated largely within existing Norfolk Southern right-of-way, 

yet would be hampered by continuing to share rail lines with freight services and other factors 

that would limit potential speeds and train frequencies15—and thus would generate lower 

ridership and less pollution reduction. 

 Based on these results, the consideration of additional “hybrid” options that incorporate 

elements of multiple alternatives may be warranted in this Tier 1 study before a preferred 

corridor is selected. Potential options for further study include an I-85 focused option that 

incorporates new Greenfield segments in certain areas where retrofitting existing interstate rightof-way with new rail lines would be particularly difficult and costly, and additional Southern 

Crescent-Greenfield hybrid options to improve travel speeds and reduce conflicts between 

freight and passenger services along the existing Norfolk Southern corridor. As noted above, we 

also urge you to further refine any alternative that is advanced to Tier 2 study to minimize any 

remaining impacts to communities and natural, historic, and cultural resources in the corridor. 

Given the significant time and cost that will likely be required to fully implement 

passenger rail improvements in the study area, we also support the development of a phased 

approach to funding and implementing the project in the Tier 2 study. In developing phasing 

plans, we encourage you to consider not only dividing the corridor into segments, but also 

phasing of technological improvements (such as shifting from diesel to electric locomotives at a 

later date if such a shift is not feasible in the near-term), as well as phasing of the types of 

passenger rail services offered (such as potentially starting with new commuter rail service in 

key metro areas before extending to corridor-wide upgrades). 

 

13 See id.at 2-42 & 3-9 to 3-10. Estimated capital costs of the proposed corridor alternatives are $13.3-15.4 billion 

for the I-85 corridor, $6.2-8.4 billion for the Greenfield corridor, and $2.0-2.3 billion for the Southern Crescent 

corridor. 

14 Id. at 2-37 to 2-38. 

15 See Draft EIS App. B, Alternatives Development Report at 42. 
5 

Thank you for your consideration of these comments, and we look forward to continuing 

to participate as this important project moves forward. 

Sincerely, 

Brian Gist 

Senior Attorney 

Travis Pietila 

Staff Attorney 
5.GDOT RESPONSE TO AGENCY COMMENTS
Russell R. McMurry, P.E., Commissioner

One Georgia Center 

600 West Peachtree Street, NW 

Atlanta, GA 30308

(404) 631-1000 Main Office

October 1, 2020

Name

Title

Company

Address

City, State, Zip Code

RE: Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Project Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Dear Stakeholder,

Thank you for reviewing and commenting on the Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for 

the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor project during the comment period that took place in 

September-November 2019. The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and the Georgia Department of 

Transportation (GDOT) have reviewed all public and agencies comments, as well as feedback received 

during the three public open house meetings held in October 2019. 

FRA and GDOT anticipate issuing a combined Final Environmental Impact Statement and Record of 

Decision (FEIS/ROD) later this year and will make that document available on the GDOT website

(http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoCharlotte) as well as other locations which will be listed in the 

FEIS/ROD. Based on the comments and the analysis in the DEIS, the Greenfield Corridor Alternative will 

be selected as the Preferred Corridor Alternative. The FEIS/ROD includes a summary of all agency and 

public comments received and their responses. The FEIS/ROD also addresses any factual corrections or 

clarifications noted in public and agency comments.

The Department thanks your agency for its continued engagement and coordination throughout this 

project process. You will receive another notification when the FEIS/ROD is published. 

If you have any questions in the meantime, please contact the GDOT Rail Program at 

railprogram@dot.ga.gov. 

Thank you,

Kaycee Mertz, AICP

Intermodal Planning & Environmental Manager 

cc: John Winkle, Federal Railroad Administration 
GDOT and FRA Responses to Agency Comments on the Atlanta to Charlotte Tier 1 DEIS

Comment Response

Name/Title: Donald W. Imm

Agency: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)

As the proposed project design is developed, please consider assessing design measures to minimize 

impacts to terrestrial wildlife for any at-grade portions of the proposed alignments and impacts to birds 

and bats for any at-grade or above-grade alignments, especially along commonly used flight paths and 

movement/migration corridors. It would be beneficial to conduct an analysis of potential mortality and 

fragmentation of habitat for species of concern that may be migratory or require unfragmented habitat 

for persistence on the landscape. Additional information for consideration in the Final EIS or future 

environmental documentation for the project.

Bats: Please assess any habitat (caves, forest, and existing infrastructure) that may be directly or 

indirectly impacted by the project to determine the level of consultation necessary with our agency, in 

addition to developing appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures, if appropriate. 

Inspections of all bridges, culverts, and structures that could be impacted by the project to determine if 

the structure is being utilized as a roost by bats may help inform the risk to federally listed bats in the 

project area. In addition, in sensitive areas, vibrations or blasting from construction activities could 

impact protected bats and nearby roosts. Please assess the trade-offs of using traditional and 

alternative construction methods and time of day restrictions for driving piles and other activities with 

high noise or vibrations. Because Federal Railroad Administration is the lead federal agency for the 

project, the national programmatic agreement between Federal Highway Administration, Federal 

Railroad Administration and Federal Transit Administration and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for 

Indiana and northern long-eared bat may provide additional guidance and insight related to avoidance 

and minimization for projects impacting those species. Information on the programmatic agreement can 

be found here: https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/section7/fhwa/index.html.

Aquatics: Federally and/or state-listed aquatic species could occur in the project area. These species are 

sensitive to sedimentation and changes in water quality. To protect water quality for both wildlife and 

human use / consumption, please consider methods to minimize disturbances to riparian buffers and 

for the protection of stream channels. The Service recommends use of erosion control practices, post 

construction stormwater management, and other best management practices to protect water quality. 

Please consider additional analyses for the Tier 2 NEPA related to any foreseeable indirect, cumulative, 

interrelated, and interdependent actions. This should include any related land use changes associated 

with stations, maintenance areas, storage areas, ancillary facilities, and other developments planned or 

included in state, county, municipal, or city planning documents for development along the proposed 

project alignment. This assessment should catalog likely changes in habitat or impervious surface in 

those areas relative to the baseline conditions. If the project is expected to require the relocation of 

utility lines, other service lines, or existing facilities, please include the impacts (direct and indirect) on 

the listed species as a result of those impacts. We would suggest that the project alignment shapefiles 

Thank you for your comment. Because this is a Tier 1 EIS, 

GDOT and FRA did not conduct project-level analysis on 

potential impacts to the human or natural environment. As 

of the date of this FEIS/ROD, neither a Project proponent 

nor funding has been identified for Tier 2 analysis, which 

could consist of one EIS covering the entire Project area or 

multiple NEPA documents covering discrete improvements. 

If FRA participates in the Tier 2 analysis, FRA will ensure that 

sufficient analysis is done of any Project impacts to the 

natural environment, including the potential impacts 

identified in USFWS's comments.
Comment Response

be uploaded into IPaC (Information for Planning and Consultation ecos.fes.gov/ipac) to update the 

species lists found in the tables for “Federal-Listed Protected Species” in Section 3 of the document. 

Because the information appears to be dated from 2014, some species are missing in the list, the status 

of some species have changed, and the states/counties have some inconsistencies. The project 

proponent can save these project files by logging into IPaC and will be able to quickly identify changes 

and other modifications to the species lists. We have attached current files from IPaC for the project 

using the Crescent, I-85 and Greenfield alignments. There are likely several species that are currently 

under review for listing under the authority of the Endangered Species Act that could require 

consultation in the future. Periodically using IPaC to check the species occurrences will help you develop 

the most up-to-date environmental document possible. In Georgia, an additional check on potential 

species occurring in the project alignment revealed only one species currently under review the tri-color 

bat (Perimyotis subflavus).

Name/Title: Jennifer Dixon

Agency: Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Historic Preservation Division (GA DNR HPD)

If the federal agency intends to utilize NEPA to comply with Section 106, in lieu of the procedures set 

forth in 36 CFR Part 800, the FRA should notify HPD and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation of 

its intent. Please refer to project number HP 150721-003 in future correspondence regarding this 

project. If we may be of further assistance, please contact me at (770) 389-7851 or 

Jennifer.dixon@dnr.ga.gov.

Thank you for your comment. Because this is a Tier 1 EIS, 

GDOT and FRA did not conduct project-level analysis on 

potential impacts to the human or natural environment. As 

of the date of this FEIS/ROD, neither a Project proponent 

nor funding has been identified for Tier 2 analysis, which 

could consist of one EIS covering the entire Project area or 

multiple NEPA documents covering discrete improvements. 

If FRA participates in the Tier 2 analysis, FRA will ensure that 

sufficient analysis is done of any Project impacts to the 

human and natural environment. At that time, FRA will also 

determine whether to merge the Section 106 and NEPA 

analyses, and will consult with GA DNR HPD. 

Name/Title: Joseph E. Wilkinson

Agency: South Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SC SHPO)

If the Federal Railroad Administration chooses to substitute the NEPA process for the process outlined 

in Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, your agency must notify our office of the 

proposed substitution. Our office maintains several resources for identifying historic properties (for links 

please see our online research resources at 

https://scdah.sc.gov/sites/default/files/Documents/Historic%20Preservation%20(SHPO)/ResearchResources.pdf). 

These resources in particular should assist your agency in identifying historic properties for NEPA 

scoping. We request that I, Joseph E. Wilkinson, be made the primary contact in our office for this 

project. Please refer to SHPO Project Number 13-SS0011 in any future correspondence regarding this 

project. If you have any questions, please contact me at (803) 896-6184 or at jwilkinson@scdah.sc.gov. 

ArchSite is an online Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping program that includes all known 

historic and archaeological sites in South Carolina. Information on both the Public View Map and 

Subscriber View Map of ArchSite can be found here: http://www.scarchsite.org. SC Historic Properties 

Thank you for your comment. Because this is a Tier 1 EIS, 

GDOT and FRA did not conduct project-level analysis on 

potential impacts to the human or natural environment. As 

of the date of this FEIS/ROD, neither a Project proponent 

nor funding has been identified for Tier 2 analysis, which 

could consist of one EIS covering the entire Project area or 

multiple NEPA documents covering discrete improvements. 

If FRA participates in the Tier 2 analysis, FRA will ensure that 

sufficient analysis is done of any Project impacts to the 

human and natural environment. At that time, FRA will also 

determine whether to merge the Section 106 and NEPA 

analyses, and will consult with South Carolina SHPO. 
Comment Response

Record (SCHPR) includes information on all National Register of Historic Places listings, and historic 

property surveys (in process) at http://schpr.sc.gov/. Additional historic contexts, survey reports, and 

related historic property documents can be found here https://scdah.sc.gov/historicpreservation/historic-properties-research/historic-contexts-survey-reports. The State Historic 

Preservation Office will provide comments regarding historic properties and effects to them once the 

federal or state agency initiates consultation. Project Review Forms and additional guidance regarding 

our office’s role in the compliance process and historic preservation can be found on our website at: 

https://scdah.sc.gov/historic-preservation/programs/review-compliance.

Name/Title: Bill Bartosh

Agency: North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)

I will use the online link to view the material. Please add me to the project mailing list and updates. Thank you for your comment. GDOT has added you to the 

email distribution list, which can also be done by sending a 

request to AtlantaCharlotteHSR@dot.ga.gov. The Project 

website is 

http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoCharlotte.

Name/Title: Amtrak

Agency: National Railroad Passenger Corporation

Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan Tier One Draft Environmental Impact 

Statement COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) 

The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) submits the following comments on the Tier 1 

Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the proposed Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail 

Corridor Investment Plan. The Atlanta to Charlotte Corridor The corridor between Atlanta and Charlotte, 

a portion of the federally designated Southeast High-Speed Rail Corridor, is an excellent candidate for 

enhanced intercity passenger rail service. Atlanta and Charlotte are approximately 250 miles apart. They 

are well within the too-far-to-drive/too-short-to-fly sweet spot in which passenger rail can offer 

competitive door-to-door trip times. Their metropolitan areas are large and growing larger. Atlanta is 

the ninth largest metropolitan area in the United States and Charlotte the 23rd largest, and both are 

among the fastest growing metropolitan areas in the country. The Atlanta-to-Charlotte corridor also has 

significant intermediate population: the fast-growing Gainesville Metropolitan Area recently surpassed 

200,000 residents. Other travel modes are ill suited to meet future travel demand between Atlanta and 

Charlotte. Each year, over a million travelers fly between Charlotte and Atlanta. Hartsfield–Jackson 

Atlanta International Airport is the busiest airport in the United States (and the world) based upon the 

number of passengers. Charlotte Douglas International Airport is the 11th busiest airport in the country. 

The Federal Aviation Administration projects that, by 2045, the number of air passengers will increase 

64% in Atlanta and 69% in Charlotte. For more than a decade, airlines have been reducing the number 

of short-distance flights because of their unfavorable economics, and the time required for security 

screenings has made them less attractive to passengers. As demand for air travel continues to grow, 

using aviation system capacity for 250-mile flights in city pairs where passenger rail could be a viable 

alternative makes increasingly less sense. The vast majority of intercity trips of 250 miles or less are 

made by automobile. The Federal Highway Administration projects that by 2045 the severe peak period 

congestion that travelers on Interstate 85 experience today in the Atlanta and Charlotte areas will 

Thank you for your comment. FRA has selected the 

Greenfield Corridor Alternative as the Preferred Alternative 

in the FEIS/ROD. This alternative provides for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks 

without at-grade roadway crossings, which best meets the 

Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the other 

two Corridor Alternatives, including Amtrak’s preference for 

the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its 

geometry limited maximum speed, causing longer travel 

times that are not competitive with existing modes of 

travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. FRA and 

GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route 

into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as 

well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion 

technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT 

also support the Preferred Alternative. If FRA participates in 

the Tier 2 analysis, FRA anticipates Amtrak interest in the 

project as Amtrak could presumably be considered to 

operate the passenger service. As of the date of this 

FEIS/ROD, neither a Project proponent nor funding has 

been identified for Tier 2 analysis, which could consist of 

one EIS covering the entire Project area or multiple NEPA 

documents covering discrete improvements.
Comment Response

spread to nearly the entire distance between the two cities. At Amtrak, we are seeing growing demand 

for intercity passenger rail service in short-distance corridors linking major metropolitan areas. Over the 

past decade, ridership on our Northeast Corridor trains between Boston and Washington has increased 

26% and ridership on our other short-distance corridor services has grown 19% without any significant 

increases in the amount of service we provide. Population growth and urbanization, increasing highway 

and aviation system congestion, changing travel habits and concerns about climate change all align with 

passenger rail’s unique capability to efficiently connect major endpoint markets and intermediate cities 

and towns along a short-distance corridor. As indicated in the DEIS, Amtrak’s only current service in the 

Atlanta-to-Charlotte corridor is a single long-distance train, the New York-to-New Orleans Crescent. The 

Crescent operates just once a day, serves Charlotte in the middle of the night in both directions, and 

takes nearly five and a half hours to travel between Atlanta and Charlotte. The stations it currently uses 

in both cities are located outside their city centers and are not served by their rail transit systems. A 

single, nocturnal long- distance train does not make any meaningful contribution to meeting the 

demand, or realizing the potential, for passenger rail service within corridors like Atlanta to Charlotte. 

On other segments of the Southeast High-Speed Rail Corridor, partnerships between Amtrak and states 

to expand and improve corridor services have produced dramatic increases in ridership. In Virginia, 

ridership between Washington, Richmond and the Hampton Roads Area has grown 56% over the past 

decade. Ridership on Amtrak’s Piedmont service between Raleigh and Charlotte has more than tripled 

over the same period. Elsewhere in the country, the state-supported Amtrak Cascades service between 

Seattle and Portland – metropolitan areas with a combined population smaller than the combined 

population of Atlanta and Charlotte – carries more passengers than travel by plane. What all of these 

services have in common is that they offer multiple daily frequencies and trip times that, although 

limited by maximum speeds of 79 miles per hour, are competitive with other modes. 

Preferred Corridor Alternative 

The DEIS identifies three corridor alternatives under consideration and solicits comments on which 

should be chosen as the preferred corridor alternative. One of the three alternatives, the “Southern 

Crescent Corridor” would follow the current route of the Crescent between Charlotte and the Atlanta 

area, utilizing existing railroad right-of-way and operating at a maximum speed of 79 to 110 miles per 

hour on a combination of shared and dedicated tracks. The others – the “Interstate” and “Greenfield” 

corridors – would require the construction of a new rail line, dedicated to passenger trains, along new 

railroad rights-of-way between the two cities on which maximum speeds would be 125 miles per hour 

or more. Amtrak strongly believes that the Southern Crescent Corridor should be selected as the 

preferred alternative. Given the population and potential of the Atlanta-to-Charlotte corridor, and the 

attractiveness of high-speed rail as a travel mode, constructing a dedicated high-speed rail line between 

the two cities is an appealing concept. However, it would be very costly: three to seven times as 

expensive as the Southern Crescent Corridor according to the DEIS’s estimates. While there have been 

many studies of developing high-speed rail lines since the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and 

Congress began designating high-speed rail corridors in 1991, no high-speed rail lines have been 

constructed due to very limited federal funding. Only 213 miles of the 9,200 miles of designated highspeed rail corridors (excluding the Northeast Corridor) are currently operated at 90 mph or above, the 
Comment Response

pertinent statutory threshold for high-speed rail. Even dramatic increases in federal funding for intercity 

passenger rail development would not likely provide enough money for construction of a dedicated 

high-speed rail line, particularly since the entire line would have to be funded and constructed as a 

single project to be useable. By contrast, additional and improved passenger rail service on the Southern 

Crescent Corridor could be provided in the near term, and service and speeds could increase 

incrementally as funding permitted. That is the approach that North Carolina and Virginia have 

successfully followed on their portions of the Southeast High-Speed Rail Corridor. Developing a service 

compatible with their planned services, which will utilize conventional trains operating at a maximum 

speed of 110 miles per hour, would also facilitate integration of Atlanta-to-Charlotte service with service 

on the remainder of the Southeast High-Speed Rail Corridor. This would allow passengers to travel from 

Atlanta to Washington, New York City and Boston without having to change trains. The construction of a 

new high-speed rail line on new railroad right-of-way through a densely populated region that the 

Interstate and Greenfield corridors would require would also trigger many environmental challenges, as 

the California High Speed Rail project demonstrates. Conversely, the environmental impacts of 

constructing an additional track on a portion of an existing railroad right-of-way for a project that will 

not significantly increase train traffic density are generally minimal, as the FRA’s categorical exclusions 

for actions that do not involve significant environmental impacts reflect. See 23 C.F.R. 771.116(c)(12). 

While trip times on a shared corridor that is not grade separated will not be as fast as on a new highspeed rail line, they can be reduced to levels that make rail competitive with driving or flying. As 

contemplated by the DEIS, a dedicated track for passenger train operations at a maximum speed of 110 

miles per hour could be constructed along a portion of the route. The installation of Positive Train 

Control will also make it possible to increase speeds above 79 miles per hour on existing tracks if they 

are maintained to the requisite track safety standards. As Virginia, North Carolina and the Amtrak 

Cascades corridor demonstrate, targeted track infrastructure investments on slower segments of 

existing rail lines with maximum speeds of 79 miles per hour can also produce measurable speed and 

trip time improvements. Conclusion Amtrak appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on this 

very important initiative. In conjunction with our forthcoming reauthorization by Congress, we are 

developing a vision and plan for the future of our network that will identify markets in which there is 

high potential for new or expanded Amtrak service. We stand ready to partner with the federal 

government, states and local communities to develop frequent, high-quality, trip time-competitive rail 

services on corridors such as Atlanta to Charlotte as soon as possible.

Name/Title: Moises Marrero

Agency: Federal Highway Administration, Georgia

Thank you for providing us an opportunity to review the September 20, 2019 Tier One Draft 

Environmental Impact Statement for the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan. 

We have no comments at this time. Please include our agency as you continue to refine the plans for 

this project.

Thank you for your comment. GDOT appreciates your 

comment on the proposed project. All comments received 

will remain a part of the Project record and will be 

summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website.

Name/Title: Ntale Kajumba

Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Comment Response

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has reviewed the Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact 

Statement (DEIS) for the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan, developed by the 

Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) in 

accordance with its responsibilities under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(C) of the 

National Environmental Policy Act. The purpose of the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor 

Investment Plan is to improve intercity passenger travel between the cities of Atlanta and Charlotte. The 

proposed expansion of the region's transportation system will improve trip time and reliability through 

highspeed passenger diesel or electric rail services.

The EPA supports more sustainable approaches that address the region's growing traffic congestion. The 

DEIS evaluates three (3) corridors for passenger rail - the Southern Crescent Corridor, the 1-85 Corridor, 

and the Greenfield Corridor. A Preferred Corridor Alternative is not identified in the DEIS. According to 

the DEIS, the Preferred Corridor Alternative will be selected in the combined Tier 1 Final Environmental 

Impact Statement/Record of Decision (FEIS/ROD). The DEIS describes various planning-level scenarios, 

however, project-related impacts are not identified. The EPA recommends the examination of relevant 

environmental impacts in the FEIS/ROD or subsequent tiered documents, as appropriate (see 

enclosure). 

Should you have any questions concerning these comments or recommendations, please feel free to 

contact Ms. Amanetta Somerville at somerville.amanetta@epa.gov or (404) 562-9025. We appreciate 

the opportunity to comment on the proposed Tier l DEIS. 

GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 

In Exhibit 0-6 of the Tier 1 DEIS, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and the Georgia Department 

of Transportation (GDOT) list performance measures by impact area which provides a brief but good 

overview of the impact areas. There is no definition or explanation of the parameters of High, Medium, 

and Low.

Recommendation: The EPA recommends that the FEIS/ROD define or explain the parameters for High, 

Medium, and Low impacts. 

Cumulative Impacts Analysis 

Cumulative impacts are not discussed in the DEIS. This examination of impacts is important for the 

evaluation of the three proposed alternatives. The Council for Environmental Quality's regulations 40 

CFR §§1500-1508 states direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts must be addressed and considered by 

Federal agencies in satisfying the requirements of EPA. Specifically, per 40 CFR §1508.7, "a cumulative 

impact is the impact on the environment, which results from the incremental impact of the action when 

added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of what agency 

(Federal or non-Federal) or person undertakes such other actions. Cumulative impacts can result from 

Thank you for your comment. FRA and GDOT recognize the 

importance of the resource areas noted in the EPA's 

comments. Because this is a Tier 1 EIS, however, GDOT and 

FRA did not conduct project-level analysis on potential 

impacts to the human or natural environment. As of the 

date of this FEIS/ROD, neither a Project proponent nor 

funding has been identified for Tier 2 analysis, which could 

consist of one EIS covering the entire Project area or 

multiple NEPA documents covering discrete improvements. 

If FRA participates in the Tier 2 analysis, FRA will ensure that 

sufficient analysis is done of any Project impacts to the 

natural environment, including any potential impacts to the 

resource areas identified in EPA's comments. In addition, 

should FRA be the lead Federal agency in any future Tier 2 

analyses, FRA will invite EPA to participate in the study(ies) 

as a Cooperating or Participating Agency.
Comment Response

individually minor but collectively significant actions taking place over a period of time."

Recommendation: The EPA recommends that the FEIS/ROD include a discussion of cumulative impacts 

that may result from the proposed high-speed rail corridor.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

Environmental Justice

Executive Order 12898, Federal Ac/ions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority and Low-Income

Populations, directs federal agencies to identify and address disproportionately high and adverse effects

of federal projects on the health or environment of minority and low-income populations to the 

greatest extent practicable. In section 3.6.3.2 of the DEIS, the proposed project will impact populations 

identified as minority and or low-income. The Tier 1 DEIS does not provide detailed information 

identifying the potentially impacted communities, and the methodology used to quantify the degree of 

impact. 

Recommendations: The EPA supports an alternative that maintains community continuity as well as 

minimizes disproportionately high and adverse effects of the proposed project on the health or 

environment of minority and or low-income populations. The EPA recommends that transportation 

agencies conduct a more in-depth evaluation of the potential transportation, and socioeconomic 

impacts of this project upon the local community in the FEIS/ROD. 

Air Quality

The Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor traverses several counties that are nonattainment or 

maintenance for one or more of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) six criteria 

pollutants. The Atlanta area is comprised of Gwinnett, DeKalb, Fulton, and Clayton Counties, which are 

designated nonattainment for the 2015 8-hour ozone (0 3) standard. The Charlotte-Rock Hill, NC-SC 

area, is comprised of Mecklenburg, Gaston, and York Counties is a maintenance area for the 2008 8-

hour 03 and 1997 03 standards. Additionally, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, is a maintenance 

area for Carbon Monoxide. Section 3.4.4.2 of the DEIS states that it is not likely that any alternative, 

regardless of the rail technology selected, will cause or contribute to an increase in the emission of 

criteria pollutants. However, the foundation of this conclusion is unclear, as the DEIS does not include 

the methodology used to quantify the degree of impact. 

Recommendation: The EPA recommends the FEIS/ROD include a more in-depth evaluation of the 

potential air quality impacts of the proposed project upon the corridor and the local community. 

General Conformity Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina have State Implementation Plans (SIP), 

developed under the Clean Air Act (CAA). Under the authority of the CAA, Federal entities are prohibited 

from taking actions in nonattainrnent or maintenance areas that do not conform to the SIP. The 

conformity analyses ensure that Federal activities do not interfere with established emissions budgets in 
Comment Response

the SIPs, that Federal activities do not cause or contribute to new violations, and that States achieve 

overall attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS. Section 3.4.2 of the DEIS states that the Tier 2 

analysis will include a conformity determination and hot spot analysis where congestion is greatest or in 

areas of sensitive receptors. Recommendations: The EPA recommends that the FEIS/ROD expand the 

general conformity discussion to include a comparative analysis of each corridor's potential impact on 

conformity. 

Water Quality 

Section 3.9.3 of the DEIS discusses the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan 

impacts to water resources. The Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative generates the least amount of 

impacts with 30 acres of wetlands impacts, 55,697 linear feet of perennial streams impacts, 64,769 

linear feet of intermittent streams impacts, and 397 acres of the 100-year floodplain impacts. The 

Interstate 85 Corridor Alternative results in 135 acres of wetlands impacts, 106,414 linear feet of 

perennial streams impacts, 86,055 linear feet of intermittent streams impacts, and 686 acres of the 100-

year floodplain impacts. The Greenfield Corridor Alternative result in 97 acres of wetlands impacts, 

117,753 linear feet of perennial streams impacts; 149,889 linear feet of intermittent streams impacts; 

and 640 acres of the 100-year floodplain impacts.

Recommendations: The EPA recommends that the selected alternative minimize impacts to wetlands 

and streams to the maximum extent practicable. Where it is not practicable to avoid wetlands, consider 

measures to elevate the road and use end-on construction to the extent practicable to minimize impacts 

on wetlands associated with changes in hydrology and other adverse effects.

Name/Title: G. Scott Neisler

Agency: City of Kings Mountain, North Carolina

RE: Resolution 19-37 Statement of Support - Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail 

Dear Kaycee: 

It was a pleasure to meet with you in Charlotte last Thursday night at the Metrolina Transportation 

Management Center for the public information open house for the Tier 1 Draft environment impact 

statement. The City Council of the City of Kings Mountain approved the attached Resolution in support 

of specific recommendations as the Tier 2 draft environmental impact statement is drafted. We 

appreciate the work of the Georgia Department of Transportation working in conjunction with both the 

South Carolina Department of Transportation and the North Carolina Department of Transportation in 

conducting a tri state public information and open house in all three states. Please keep us on the list of 

interested agencies as this project moves forward. 

RESOLUTION 19-37 ATLANTA TO CHARLOTTE PASSENGER RAIL CORRIDOR INVESTMENT PLAN TIER 1 

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SUPPORT 

Thank you for your comment and for your interest in the 

Project. FRA has selected the Greenfield Corridor 

Alternative as the Preferred Alternative in the FEIS/ROD. 

This alternative provides for high-speed rail with frequent 

service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade 

roadway crossings, which best meets the Purpose and Need 

of the Project. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, including the City’s preference for the I-85 

Corridor Alternative; however, the exact alignment of the 

Greenfield Corridor Alternative including the route into 

Charlotte will be defined in a future Tier 2 analysis. FRA 

dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while it performed 

better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, the 

geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to 

reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and 

attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also expressed 

concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, 
Comment Response

WHEREAS, as part of the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor investment plan (the Project), the 

Federal Rail Administration (FRA) and the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) prepared a Tier 

1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the extension of the Southeast High-Speed Rail 

(SEHSR) corridor from Charlotte to Atlanta; and 

WHEREAS, the Project would satisfy the following needs, population and employment growth, improve 

regional transportation system connectivity, increase transportation system capacity, improve travel 

times and reliability, provide an alternative travel mode, traveler safety, improve energy efficiency and 

air quality and maintain and enhance economic growth and vitality; and 

WHEREAS, public information open houses were held in Atlanta, GA on October 22, 2019, Greenville, SC 

on October 23, 2019 and Charlotte, NC on October 24, 2019; and 

WHEREAS, the City of Kings Mountain was represented at the Greenville, SC and Charlotte, NC public 

information open houses, asked questions about Tier 2 analysis which will include decisions related to 

station locations, project alignment within the preferred corridor alternative, airport connections, 

technology and the Atlanta Approach; and 

WHEREAS, the three alternatives analyzed were the Southern Crescent, 1-85 and Greenfield; and 

WHEREAS, the Southern Crescent alternative had the lowest top operation speed of 79-110 MPH with 

only 4 daily round trips with 2050 projected Annual Ridership of 940,000 to 1,118,000 and an estimated 

capital cost of $2 Billion to $2.3 Billion; and WHEREAS, the 1-85 alternative had a top operation speed of 

between 125-180 MPH, with 14 daily round trips and project 2050 annual ridership of 5,500,000 to 

5,620,000 and an estimated capital cost of $13.3 Billion and $15.4 Billion; and

WHEREAS, the Greenfield alternative had a top operation speed of between 125-220 MPH utilizing 

electric locomotives, with 16-22 daily round trips, projected 2050 annual ridership of 5,380,000 to 

6,300,000 an estimated capital cost of $6.2 Billion to $8.4 Billion; and 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THIS 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE 

CITY OF KINGS MOUNTAIN, NORTH CAROLINA: 

Section 1. Council hereby supports the Tier 2 NEPA process and encourages GDOT, SCDOT and NCDOT 

to look at a hybrid alternates of the "Greenfield" Alternate from Atlanta to Greenville-Spartanburg 

Airport, and the "Interstate 85" Alternate continuing north from that point to Charlotte into a new 

fourth alternate route; and

Section 2. The City of Kings Mountain is located at the intersection of both 1-85 and the intersection of 4 

lane Rt. 74 at Exit 10 of 1-85, and Council hereby supports The City of Kings Mountain as a potential 

passenger rail station location that could serve as Western North Carolina "Park and Ride" location on

the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor; and

particularly through South Carolina. North Carolina DOT and 

South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. As the 

Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider 

studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the 

Greenfield Corridor to allow easier access to the service. If 

FRA participates in the Tier 2 analysis, FRA will work closely 

with the local jurisdictions and will take their interests into 

account as the analysis progresses. As of the date of this 

FEIS/ROD, neither a Project proponent nor funding has 

been identified for Tier 2 analysis, which could consist of 

one EIS covering the entire Project area or multiple NEPA 

documents covering discrete improvements. 
Comment Response

Section 3. Council hereby supports the 1-85 location alternative at the City of Kings Mountain as the 

visibility of passenger rail at Interstate 85 provides car passengers an visual acknowledgement that 

riding the train would be a faster alternative to passenger vehicles, especially in 2050 when Interstate 

highway capacity will be at a much higher volume that 2012 volumes utilized in the study; and 

Section 4. Council hereby acknowledges the long-term importance of passenger rail between Charlotte 

and requests that the Mayor provide a copy of this resolution prior to November 4, 2019 to: 

Kaycee Mertz, 

Rail and Transit Planning Manager 

Georgia Department of Transportation 

Division of Intermodal 

600 West Peachtree Street NW 

Atlanta, GA 30308 

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29th day of October, 2019. 

Name/Title: Shaun Green

Agency: Atlanta Beltline

Kaycee:

I appreciate you accepting these comments from ABI...

[?] There are no trail nor transit projects listed within the Georgia section of the Planned and

Committed Projects list (Exhibit 2-7).

o MARTA/Atlanta BeltLine previously performed a Tier 1 EIS, with a ROD issued in 2012.

o The BeltLine program of projects is within Atlanta’s Transportation Plan, both trail and transit.

o ABI and PATH Foundation have built and will build more local-funding only trail segments. Please do 

not ignore the BeltLine corridor because its entirety is not in the RTP.

[?] The proposed Tier 1 DEIS is carrying forward passenger rail alignments within the “Atlanta Approach” 

that are in the NSR and CSX Corridors, to get to the Western Railroad Trunk via Howell Interlock.

o As the corridor width is set at 600’, a lot of the same dirt that we are contemplating is being 

contemplated by this DEIS.

o Do not preclude Atlanta BeltLine (or Clifton Corridor) within the expected overlapping geographies.

[?] Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. will soon advertise a procurement for a trail and transit alternatives analysis 

and feasibility study. Generally, this will be looking at the Atlanta BeltLine corridor between MARTA 

Bankhead Station and MARTA Lindbergh Station (or from about 9 o’clock to 1 o’clock on the BeltLine).

[?] Atlanta BeltLine Inc. is happy to work with you to try to further all of these projects.

Thank you for your comment and for your interest in the 

Project. FRA has selected the Greenfield Corridor 

Alternative as the Preferred Alternative in the FEIS/ROD. 

This alternative provides for high-speed rail with frequent 

service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade 

roadway crossings, which best meets the Purpose and Need 

of the Project. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives; however, FRA and GDOT did leave open until 

Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and 

confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well as the 

location of stations and the choice of propulsion 

technology. If FRA participates in the Tier 2 analysis, FRA 

will work closely with the local jurisdictions and will take 

their interests into account as the analysis progresses. As of 

the date of this FEIS/ROD, neither a Project proponent nor 

funding has been identified for Tier 2 analysis, which could 

consist of one EIS covering the entire Project area or 

multiple NEPA documents covering discrete improvements.

Name/Title: Matthew Lee

Agency: Tucker-Northlake CID, Georgia

Re: Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Greenfield Corridor with the CSX Atlanta approach)

Dear Commissioner McMurry,

Thank you for your comment, for your attendance at the 

Project open houses, and for your interest in the Project. 

FRA has selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative as the 

Preferred Alternative in the FEIS/ROD. This alternative 
Comment Response

Thank you for your support in sponsoring the Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the 

Southeast High-Speed Rail (SEHSR) route from Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport to 

Charlotte, North Carolina. Kaycee Mertz and her team at the Public Information Open House in Atlanta 

were helpful in communicating the goals of the projects as well as the limitations. The documents online 

were also helpful in understanding the scope and potential of the project. Particularly the Greenfield 

Corridor with the CSX Atlanta approach. Stations in Athens, Lawrenceville, and Tucker make sense for 

Georgia. The CSX route also passes through the Emory University campus. Placing commuter rail along 

this corridor shifts the focus from decades of a top-end centric investment pattern, to one that connects 

two of the state’s largest and most well-known academic institutions. Between the two, the proposed 

stations in Tucker and Lawrenceville make sense. The Northlake District in Tucker has access to I-285 

from three exits, the MMIP includes direct access to the express lane system from Northlake Parkway, 

and the I-285 Top End Transit Study proposes a BRT/Express bus station along Northlake Parkway. 

Commuter rail would be a natural fit. From a regional perspective, a station in Tucker makes more sense 

than duplicating existing rail access to Hartsfield-Jackson from Doraville. If the Tucker-Northlake CID can 

be of any assistance in helping fund Tier 2 of the study, please let me know.

provides for high-speed rail with frequent service operating 

on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings,

which best meets the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA 

dismissed the other two Corridor Alternatives; however, 

FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the 

exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice 

of propulsion technology. If FRA participates in the Tier 2 

analysis, FRA will work closely with the local jurisdictions 

and will take their interests into account as the analysis 

progresses. As of the date of this FEIS/ROD, neither a 

Project proponent nor funding has been identified for Tier 2 

analysis, which could consist of one EIS covering the entire 

Project area or multiple NEPA documents covering discrete 

improvements.

Name/Title: Timothy Gibbs; Robert Cook

Agency: Charlotte Department of Transportation (CDOT); Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization (CRTPO);

The following comments are provided on the draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the 

Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan and were developed jointly by the 

Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization (CRTPO) and the Charlotte Department of 

Transportation (CDOT). The comments are not listed in any order of importance.

1. The document refers to five MPOs being located with the study area. There are seven. Please ensure 

the Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln MPO (GCLMPO) and the Rock Hill/Ft. Mill Area Transportation Study 

(RFATS) are identified in the final EIS.

2. The document refers to the Mecklenburg-Union Metropolitan Planning Organization. The MPO for 

the Charlotte region was renamed the Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization (CRTPO) 

in 2013. The final EIS should make the correction.

3. Three distinct corridor alternatives are identified. Will the Tier 2 process be flexible and allow for the 

consideration of a hybrid option? For example, a combination of the Greenfield Corridor and the I-85 

Corridor.

4. The Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS) is preparing to move into the design phase for the proposed 

Silver Line that will provide service to Charlotte Douglas International Airport. The Silver Line will closely 

parallel the project’s sole alternative in Charlotte, particularly near the Airport.

5. The Centralina Council of Governments (CCOG) is scheduled to begin a regional transit study before 

the end of 2019 that will involve multiple counties in North Carolina and South Carolina, including three 

in the study area: Mecklenburg and Gaston in North Carolina and York in South Carolina. The Tier 2 

Thank you for your comment. The FEIS/ROD has been 

updated to add the two MPOs and to correct the name of 

the CRTPO (refer to the Tier 1 DEIS Errata Table in the 

FEIS/ROD). FRA has selected the Greenfield Corridor 

Alternative as the Preferred Alternative in the FEIS/ROD. 

This alternative provides for high-speed rail with frequent 

service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade 

roadway crossings, which best meets the Purpose and Need 

of the Project. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives; however, FRA and GDOT did leave open until 

Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and 

confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well as the 

location of stations and the choice of propulsion 

technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT 

also support this Alternative. If FRA participates in the Tier 2 

analysis, FRA will ensure that sufficient analysis is done of 

any Project impacts to the natural environment, including 

impacts to land use, and the analysis will include indirect 

and cumulative effects (ICE). The ICE analysis should take 

into account other local initiatives, including the Silver Line 

and the CCOG's study. Finally, GDOT intends to eliminate, to 

the extent possible, the number of at-grade crossings. That 

analysis will also be part of any Tier 2 studies. As of the date 

of this FEIS/ROD, neither a Project proponent nor funding 

has been identified for Tier 2 analysis, which could consist 
Comment Response

phase of this project should account for this major initiative.

6. The DEIS does not appear to analyze land use impacts of the Greenfield Corridor. Will the Tier 2 

analysis do so?

7. Should it be assumed that the Greenfield Corridor will not include at-grade crossings?

8. Will the Tier 2 analysis provide an indirect and cumulative impacts assessment?

of one EIS covering the entire Project area or multiple NEPA 

documents covering discrete improvements.

Name/Title: Ramona Bartos

Agency: North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NC SHPO)

We are in receipt of the announcement of publication of the Tier 1 DEIS for the above-referenced 

undertaking. We have reviewed the materials presented and concur that the corridors selected for 

further study in Tier 2 appear to be appropriate within the State of North Carolina. We will look forward 

to coordinating with GDOT as it undertakes the additional, in-depth studies.

Please send all future correspondence on this matter to Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer 

Ramona M. Bartos at 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-4617 or, preferably, by email to: 

environmental.review@ncdcr.gov. You will get an autoreply from that address to let you know that we 

got your request for review/comments and will respond accordingly. As we are a “one-stop” 

cultural/historic resources shop, we will ensure that above/below ground and submerged resources are 

considered by our staffs.

Multiple previously recorded sites were identified along the three proposed corridor routes. Two of the 

proposed routes, Southern Crescent and I-85, would mostly be collocated within existing railroad or 

interstate ROWs and would likely have minimal impacts to eligible or unrecorded, but potentially 

eligible, archaeological resources. The Greenfield alternative, however, would extend through areas that 

have received little systematic survey and appear to contain landforms that have a high probability for 

archaeological sites. An archaeological survey of portions of the APE may well be recommended 

depending on the specific alternative that is selected. We, therefore, look forward to reviewing the APE 

of preferred alternative as the planning progresses and more information about areas of ground 

disturbance are identified. Given our experience with the Richmond to Charlotte section of the 

Southeastern High Speed Rail projects, we would also expect that additional architectural survey work 

will be needed within the APE once a Preferred Corridor is selected. The above comments are made 

pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic 

Preservation’s Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above 

comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579 or 

environmental.review@ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the 

above referenced tracking number.

Thank you for your comment. Because this is a Tier 1 EIS, 

GDOT and FRA did not conduct project-level analysis on 

potential impacts to the human or natural environment. 

FRA has selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative as the 

Preferred Alternative in the FEIS/ROD. This alternative 

provides for high-speed rail with frequent service operating 

on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings,

which best meets the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA 

dismissed the other two Corridor Alternatives; however, 

FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the 

exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice 

of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South 

Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. As of the date of 

this FEIS/ROD, neither a Project proponent nor funding has 

been identified for Tier 2 analysis, which could consist of 

one EIS covering the entire Project area or multiple NEPA 

documents covering discrete improvements. If FRA 

participates in the Tier 2 analysis, FRA will ensure that 

sufficient analysis is done of any Project impacts to the 

human and natural environment. At that time, FRA will also 

determine whether to merge the Section 106 and NEPA 

analyses, and will consult with the North Carolina SHPO 

and, if necessary, the Advisory Council on Historic 

Preservation. 

Name/Title: Frank Auman

Agency: City of Tucker, Georgia
Comment Response

The City of Tucker has been following the news of the Tier 1 Study of the Atlanta to Charlotte High 

Speed Rail corridor with great interest. The concept represents an economic game-changer for the 

entire region and we certainly look forward to seeing it become a reality. As you know, Tucker is one of 

the possibilities for a stop along this line as it travels into and out of Atlanta. Ours is a city with unique 

highway access; Interstate 285 (with the planned Managed Lanes), US 29, US 78 and SR 236 all traverse 

Tucker, and we are a stone's throw from Interstate 85. We are also home to a highly desirable 

commercial power center at the former Northlake Mall, which last week announced the first tenant in 

its hundred-million dollar revitalization: Emory Healthcare is committed to bring 1,600 jobs to Tucker, 

and is certain to be a catalyst for much more development in the next several years. Beyond just its 

relation to Tucker, a line that passes through Athens (the Greenfield alignment) would be extremely 

valuable as a way to enable day trips for business or pleasure, without driving, from metro Atlanta and 

points north. The attendant conveniences of being able to work, read and use electronic devices on the 

trip, while saving valuable parking space and costs, as well as the benefits to the environment, would 

make it certain to be heavily used by students, businesspeople and many others. As a descendant of the 

"Brain Train", it has the feel of something that would be a natural evolution for the region. For these 

reasons, the Greenfield Alternative would be the ideal choice. If I, or our staff, can be of any help to you 

in this process, please do not hesitate to reach out. 

Thank you for your comment and for your support for the 

Project. FRA has selected the Greenfield Corridor 

Alternative as the Preferred Alternative in the FEIS/ROD. 

This alternative provides for high-speed rail with frequent 

service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade 

roadway crossings, which best meets the Purpose and Need 

of the Project. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives; however, FRA and GDOT did leave open until 

Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and 

confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well as the 

location of stations and the choice of propulsion 

technology. If FRA participates in the Tier 2 analysis, FRA 

will work closely with the local jurisdictions and will take 

their interests into account as the analysis progresses. As of 

the date of this FEIS/ROD, neither a Project proponent nor 

funding has been identified for Tier 2 analysis, which could 

consist of one EIS covering the entire Project area or 

multiple NEPA documents covering discrete improvements. 

Name/Title: Resolution

Agency: City of Toccoa, Georgia

WHEREAS the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) and the Federal Railroad Administration 

(FRA) have recently released a draft study for a high-speed rail corridor that would extend from Atlanta, 

Georgia to Charlotte North Carolina; and, 

WHEREAS a 280 mile rail line between the two Southeastern cities of Atlanta and Charlotte could create 

jobs, reduce air pollution and improve mobility for millions of passengers a year; and, 

WHEREAS the rail corridor expansion's purpose is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta 

and Charlotte by expanding the region's transportation system capacity and improving trip time and 

reliability through high-speed passenger rail services; and, 

WHEREAS the "Southern Crescent" route was one of the three proposed routes studied by the draft 

report; and, 

WHEREAS the "Southern Crescent" route would follow the Norfolk Southern Railroad right of way North 

of Interstate 85, with proposed six stations in Georgia: Toccoa, Gainesville, Suwanee, Doraville, 

Downtown Atlanta and Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport, and two stations in South Carolina: 

Spartanburg and Greenville on the way to Charlotte; and, 

WHEREAS the Commission of the City of Toccoa has long supported expanding transportation options, 

including rail service; and, 

Thank you for your comment. FRA has selected the 

Greenfield Corridor Alternative as the Preferred Alternative 

in the FEIS/ROD. This alternative provides for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks 

without at-grade roadway crossings, which best meets the 

Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the other 

two Corridor Alternatives, including the City’s preference 

for the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its 

geometry limited maximum speed, causing longer travel 

times that are not competitive with existing modes of 

travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. FRA and 

GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route 

into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as 

well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion 

technology. As the Project continues to develop, 

municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of 

providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow 

easier access to the service. If FRA participates in the Tier 2 

analysis, FRA will work closely with the local jurisdictions 

and will take their interests into account as the analysis 

progresses. As of the date of this FEIS/ROD, neither a 

Project proponent nor funding has been identified for Tier 2 
Comment Response

WHEREAS following public comment on the draft study, GDOT will prepare a final study and select a 

preferred corridor for the Atlanta to Charlotte line; and 

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the governing authority of the City of Toccoa, Georgia, that as a 

group and as individuals, the governing authority supports the high speed rail line utilizing the 

"Southern Crescent" route.

RESOLVED this 28th day of October, 2019. 

analysis, which could consist of one EIS covering the entire 

Project area or multiple NEPA documents covering discrete 

improvements.

Name/Title: Alyssa Durden

Agency: City of Suwanee, Georgia

The City of Suwanee appreciates the opportunity to provide input as a stakeholder agency on potential 

routes for Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail. The City has reviewed the Tier 1 Draft Environment 

Impact Statements and is supportive of any of the three potential routes with a station location in the 

City of Suwanee. The location of a rail station in Suwanee is consistent with the Suwanee 2040 

Comprehensive Plan. The Suwanee City Council approved a resolution on October 22, 2019 in support of 

the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail with a station location in Suwanee. I have enclosed a copy of this 

resolution. Please feel free to contact me if the Suwanee can be of any assistance as the project moves 

forward. 770-904-2271 / adurden@suwanee.com.

Resolution -- A RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT A PASSENGER RAIL STATION WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF 

SUWANEE; AND OTHER PURPOSES 

WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council of Suwanee are supportive of the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail 

Corridor Investment Plan proposed by the Federal Railroad Administration and the Georgia Department 

of Transportation; and 

WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council of Suwanee support the proposed location of a passenger rail station 

within the city limits of Suwanee; and

WHEREAS, the location of a passenger rail station in the City of Suwanee is consistent with the Suwanee 

2040 Comprehensive Plan; and 

WHEREAS, the Suwanee 2040 Comprehensive Plan provides a coordinated and comprehensive plan of 

the long-term goals, objectives and priorities of Suwanee; and 

WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan serves to promote the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, 

prosperity, and general welfare of the present and future inhabitants of the City of Suwanee; and 

WHEREAS, the City of Suwanee is willing to work with other agencies to establish passenger rail service 

to and from Suwanee; and 

Thank you for your comment. FRA has selected the 

Greenfield Corridor Alternative as the Preferred Alternative 

in the FEIS/ROD. This alternative provides for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks 

without at-grade roadway crossings, which best meets the 

Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the other 

two Corridor Alternatives; however, FRA and GDOT did 

leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into 

Atlanta (one of which - the NS Approach - could potentially 

support a station in Suwanee) and confirmation of the route 

into Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the 

choice of propulsion technology. As the Project continues to 

develop, municipalities could consider studying the 

feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield 

Corridor to allow easier access to the service. If FRA 

participates in the Tier 2 analysis, FRA will work closely with 

the local jurisdictions and will take their interests into 

account as the analysis progresses. As of the date of this 

FEIS/ROD, neither a Project proponent nor funding has 

been identified for Tier 2 analysis, which could consist of 

one EIS covering the entire Project area or multiple NEPA 

documents covering discrete improvements.
Comment Response

NOW THEREFORE, be it ordained and resolved and it is hereby resolved by the Mayor and Council of the 

City of Suwanee this the 22th day of October, 2019, Suwanee supports the location of a passenger rail 

station within the City of Suwanee. 

Name/Title: Brian Gist

Agency: Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC)

The Southern Environmental Law Center would like to provide the following comments on the Tier 1 

Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor 

Investment Plan. SELC is a non-partisan, non-profit organization that works throughout the Southeast to 

promote transportation and land use decisions that strengthen our communities, protect our 

environment, and improve our quality of life. SELC strongly supports the proposed Southeast High 

Speed Rail Corridor, and we have previously participated in environmental studies for a number of other 

segments of this regional plan. Improving intercity passenger rail in the Southeast is critical to make rail 

more competitive with automobile and air travel, and would provide significant economic and 

community benefits in expanding travel options, reducing emissions of greenhouse gases and other 

pollutants, and promoting more efficient land use patterns throughout the region. Enhancing passenger 

rail service between Atlanta and Charlotte would be particularly beneficial due to the substantial growth 

in population, employment, and traffic projected in the study area between these cities in the coming 

years. However, the Tier 1 Draft EIS makes clear that identifying a preferred corridor for these 

improvements will be a complex decision, involving important tradeoffs between the relative economic 

and travel benefits, capital and other costs, and environmental and community impacts of the proposed 

alternatives. In our comments below, we highlight some of the key issues that must be considered in 

making this decision and identify some areas in which additional analysis may be needed in this Tier 1 

study before a preferred corridor is selected. Based on the mixed results of each of the proposed 

corridor alternatives in the Draft EIS in terms of benefits, costs, and impacts, this includes further review 

of potential “hybrid” options that incorporate elements of multiple alternatives. We also flag a number 

of issues that will warrant particular attention in the future Tier 2 EIS or other detailed studies that may 

be conducted as this project moves forward. Benefits of Enhanced Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail. 

The study area includes some of the fastest-growing cities in the Southeast, and significant additional 

population and employment growth is projected in the near future. Given this estimated growth, it is 

not surprising that the Draft EIS also projects marked increases in traffic volumes and congestion in the 

study area’s interstate corridors—including failing levels of service along much of the I-85 corridor 

despite the highway being 10 to 14 lanes wide in some areas. Enhancing passenger rail service in the 

study area would help to alleviate this congestion and provide several other important benefits, 

including expanding travel options, encouraging more efficient land development patterns, and 

reducing transportation-related emissions of greenhouse gases and other air pollutants. The Draft EIS 

estimates that the proposed corridor alternatives would greatly improve passenger rail travel times 

between Atlanta and Charlotte, making rail a much more competitive alternative to automobile and air 

travel and diverting significant traffic from these other modes. It appears the greatest benefits in this 

respect would result from the Greenfield and I-85 corridor alternatives, which are expected to have the 

highest travel speeds and ridership, while not having to compete with freight rail services (as would be 

the case for the Southern Crescent alternative utilizing the existing Norfolk Southern line). By 2050, the 

Draft EIS estimates that the Greenfield alternative would divert 4.3 million automobile trips each year 

Thank you for your comment. FRA and GDOT recognize the 

importance of the resource areas noted in the SELC's 

comments, including Cultural and Historic Resources and 

Environmental Justice Communities. Because this is a Tier 1 

EIS, however, GDOT and FRA did not conduct project-level 

analysis on potential impacts to the human or natural 

environment. As of the date of this FEIS/ROD, neither a 

Project proponent nor funding has been identified for Tier 2 

analysis, which could consist of one EIS covering the entire 

Project area or multiple NEPA documents covering discrete 

improvements. If FRA participates in the Tier 2 analysis, FRA 

will ensure that sufficient analysis is done of any Project 

impacts to the natural environment, including any potential 

impacts to the resource areas identified in SELC's 

comments. FRA has selected the Greenfield Corridor 

Alternative as the Preferred Alternative in the FEIS/ROD. 

This alternative provides for high-speed rail with frequent 

service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade 

roadway crossings, which best meets the Purpose and Need 

of the Project. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until 

Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and 

confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well as the 

location of stations and the choice of propulsion 

technology, the decision on which will include an analysis of 

emissions. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also 

support this Alternative. FRA dismissed the Southern 

Crescent because the corridor’s geometry limited maximum 

speeds, generating travel times that are not competitive 

with existing modes of travel, and attracting lower levels of 

ridership. FRA dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while it

performed better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, 

the geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains 

to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and 

attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also expressed 

concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, 

particularly through South Carolina. Finally, the I-85 
Comment Response

from the study area’s highways, the I-85 alternative would divert 3.9 million auto trips, and the 

Southern Crescent option would divert 1 million auto trips. The Draft EIS also estimates that the higherspeed I-85 and Greenfield alternatives would respectively divert 8% and 10% of all air trips between 

Atlanta and Charlotte by 2050. In addition to reducing automobile and air travel delays, increasing the 

share of passenger rail in the study area would reduce transportation-related emissions of greenhouse 

gases (GHG) and other air pollutants. The transportation sector is now the nation’s largest contributor of 

GHG emissions, and several study area localities remain in Clean Air Act “nonattainment” or 

“maintenance” areas for criteria pollutants. As a result, we note and support the inclusion of a specific 

element to “improve energy efficiency and air quality” in the Draft EIS’s purpose and need statement, as 

well as recognition elsewhere in the document of the benefits passenger rail can provide in meeting this 

need. It will be crucial that the Final EIS and/or Tier 2 study include a comprehensive analysis of the 

project’s anticipated effects on GHG and other air pollutant emissions in the study area, including 

analysis specific to the choice between diesel or electric locomotive technology. Environmental and 

Community Impacts. The Draft EIS indicates that each of the proposed corridor alternatives includes 

many communities and important environmental, historic, and cultural resources that warrant careful 

consideration in selecting a preferred corridor in this EIS and further study in a Tier 2 EIS or other future 

reviews completed for the project. Although the large scale of the environmental screening areas 

identified for the corridor alternatives make it inevitable that each will include many natural resources, 

there appear to be significant differences in the level of potential impacts between alternatives. For 

instance, potential impacts to aquatic resources in the study area—including wetlands, streams, and 

floodplains—are generally far greater for the Greenfield and I-85 corridor alternatives than the Southern 

Crescent route along the existing Norfolk Southern alignment. The Greenfield alternative also has the 

potential to impact far more natural habitat than the other options under review. We urge you to 

carefully consider these potential effects in selecting a preferred corridor alternative, as well as any 

available options to avoid or minimize impacts to these resources in more detailed future studies. 

Moreover, across all corridor alternatives the Draft EIS indicates that the CSX Atlanta Approach option is 

expected to result in much greater impacts to aquatic resources and natural habitat than the Norfolk 

Southern Approach. For example, potential wetlands impacts from the Southern Crescent alternative 

increase from 45 acres following the Norfolk Southern Approach to 100 acres under the CSX Approach 

option, with similar increases for the Greenfield and I-85 alternatives and various other natural resource 

types. While we understand that a decision on the preferred Atlanta approach option is planned to be 

deferred to the Tier 2 study, these initial results raise major questions about the CSX Atlanta Approach 

that will need to be addressed before this option is advanced any further. The Draft EIS similarly shows 

that each of the proposed corridors include a substantial number of communities and historic and 

cultural resources, including many block groups that qualify as minority or low-income environmental 

justice communities. While enhanced passenger rail service would benefit many study area residents, it 

also has the potential to cause adverse effects from increased noise and vibration, visual impacts, and in 

some cases, more direct property and relocation impacts. Careful consideration is needed of these 

potential impacts in selecting a preferred corridor for this project, and of any available options to avoid 

or minimize these impacts in a future Tier 2 study and in the development of the project’s specific 

alignment and design. The results of the Draft EIS analysis present difficult questions about the relative 

benefits and drawbacks of the proposed corridor alternatives. Quite simply, there are some significant 

presents engineering challenges due to corridor constrains 

around Greenville, SC that would require the Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. 
Comment Response

benefits and serious problems with each alternative. The I-85 and Greenfield alternatives would 

produce the greatest benefits in terms of increased passenger rail speeds, ridership, and revenue, as 

well as reducing greenhouse gas emissions and other air pollutants; yet these options would result in 

greater impacts to many natural resources and would be far more expensive to build. According to the 

Draft EIS, the I-85 alternative would be particularly costly due to the challenges involved with 

constructing new passenger rail lines around—and within the footprint of—the existing interstate. In 

contrast, the Southern Crescent alternative would be much less expensive and could be accommodated 

largely within existing Norfolk Southern right-of-way, yet would be hampered by continuing to share rail 

lines with freight services and other factors that would limit potential speeds and train frequencies—

and thus would generate lower ridership and less pollution reduction. Based on these results, the 

consideration of additional “hybrid” options that incorporate elements of multiple alternatives may be 

warranted in this Tier 1 study before a preferred corridor is selected. Potential options for further study 

include an I-85 focused option that incorporates new Greenfield segments in certain areas where 

retrofitting existing interstate right-of-way with new rail lines would be particularly difficult and costly, 

and additional Southern Crescent-Greenfield hybrid options to improve travel speeds and reduce 

conflicts between freight and passenger services along the existing Norfolk Southern corridor. As noted 

above, we also urge you to further refine any alternative that is advanced to Tier 2 study to minimize 

any remaining impacts to communities and natural, historic, and cultural resources in the corridor. 

Given the significant time and cost that will likely be required to fully implement passenger rail 

improvements in the study area, we also support the development of a phased approach to funding and 

implementing the project in the Tier 2 study. In developing phasing plans, we encourage you to consider 

not only dividing the corridor into segments, but also phasing of technological improvements (such as 

shifting from diesel to electric locomotives at a later date if such a shift is not feasible in the near-term), 

as well as phasing of the types of passenger rail services offered (such as potentially starting with new 

commuter rail service in key metro areas before extending to corridor-wide upgrades). Thank you for 

your consideration of these comments, and we look forward to continuing to participate as this 

important project moves forward.

Name/Title: Resolution

Agency: Stephens County, Georgia

A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (GDOT) AND THE 

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA) FOR A HIGH-SPEED RAIL CORRIDOR WHEREAS, the Georgia 

Department of Transportation (GDOT) and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) have recently 

released a draft study for a high-speed rail corridor that would extend from Atlanta, Georgia to 

Charlotte, North Carolina; and 

WHEREAS, a 280 mile rail line between the two Southeastern cities of Atlanta and Charlotte could 

create jobs, reduce air pollution, and improve mobility for millions of passengers a year; and 

WHEREAS, the corridor expansion purpose is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and 

Charlotte by expanding the region's transportation system capacity, and improving trip lime, and 

reliability through high-speed passenger rail services; and 

Thank you for your comment. FRA has selected the 

Greenfield Corridor Alternative as the Preferred Alternative 

in the FEIS/ROD. This alternative provides for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks 

without at-grade roadway crossings, which best meets the 

Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the other 

two Corridor Alternatives, including the County’s 

preference for the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative 

because its geometry limited maximum speed, causing 

longer travel times that are not competitive with existing 

modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. 

FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the 

exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 
Comment Response

WHEREAS, the "Southern Crescent" route was one of the original proposed routes studied by the draft 

report.; and 

WHEREAS, the "Southern Crescent" route would follow the Norfolk Southern Railroad right of way 

North or Interstate 85, with proposed six stations in Georgia: Toccoa, Gainesville, Suwanee, Doraville, 

Downtown Atlanta and Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport, and two stations in South Carolina: 

Spartanburg and Greenville on the way to Charlotte; and 

WHEREAS, the Stephens County Board of Commissioners support expanding transportation and rail 

services; and 

WHEREAS, the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) prepared a final study and selected a 

preferred corridor for the Atlanta to Charlotte line; and 

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Stephens County Board of Commissioners, supports the high 

speed rail line utilizing the "Southern Crescent" route. 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice 

of propulsion technology. As the Project continues to 

develop, municipalities could consider studying the 

feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield 

Corridor to allow easier access to the service. If FRA 

participates in the Tier 2 analysis, FRA will work closely with 

the local jurisdictions and will take their interests into 

account as the analysis progresses. As of the date of this 

FEIS/ROD, neither a Project proponent nor funding has 

been identified for Tier 2 analysis, which could consist of 

one EIS covering the entire Project area or multiple NEPA 

documents covering discrete improvements.

Name/Title: Natalia Rosario

Agency: City of Spartanburg, South Carolina

I am the city planner for the city of Spartanburg. We would be supportive of a stop/station in 

Spartanburg County or Spartanburg City, and are supportive of the project overall. During our Comp 

Planning Process we will conduct exercises considering the Downtown (Norfolk-Southern) and 

585/Milliken stop. Personally I would be thrilled for this to happen, even without a stop in Spartanburg -

it would be amazing for the development and economic opportunity for the entire Piedmont-Atlantic. I 

would prefer a stop in the City, but I am most supportive of the I-85 option. The Greenfield option 

would not take the advantage of existing infrastructure/regional modes/transit connections. I would 

also want to see as least amount of added environmental impact as possible and would be appreciative 

of the possibility to alleviate traffic congestion along I-85. This project will change the upstate radically -

regardless of how many stops are placed here. Transit Oriented Development for the win. I hope I see 

this come to fruition during my lifetime. 

Thank you for your comment and for your interest in the 

Project. FRA has selected the Greenfield Corridor 

Alternative as the Preferred Alternative in the FEIS/ROD. 

This alternative provides for high-speed rail with frequent 

service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade 

roadway crossings, which best meets the Purpose and Need 

of the Project. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, including the City’s preference for the I-85 

Corridor Alternative; however, the exact alignment of the 

Greenfield Corridor Alternative including the route into 

Charlotte will be defined in a future Tier 2 analysis. FRA 

dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while it performed 

better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, the 

geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to 

reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and 

attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also expressed 

concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, 

particularly through South Carolina. In particular, the I-85 

Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to 

corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would 

require a Project Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct 

through the area. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina 

DOT also support this Alternative. As the Project continues 

to develop, municipalities could consider studying the 
Comment Response

feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield 

Corridor to allow easier access to the service. If FRA 

participates in the Tier 2 analysis, FRA will work closely with 

the local jurisdictions and will take their interests into 

account as the analysis progresses. As of the date of this 

FEIS/ROD, neither a Project proponent nor funding has 

been identified for Tier 2 analysis, which could consist of 

one EIS covering the entire Project area or multiple NEPA 

documents covering discrete improvements.

Name/Title: Phil Lindler

Agency: City of Greenwood, South Carolina

The Greenfield route should be chosen for the following reasons: More affordable route, less 

development in the area to have to build around; the area south of I-85 will be the high growth 

population areas over the next 50 years, prime area for urban village, economic generator around the 

few upstate stations, more opportunities to connect with high population areas and accessibilty by all of 

the upstate. 

Thank you for your comment and support. FRA has selected 

the Greenfield Corridor Alternative as the Preferred 

Alternative in the FEIS/ROD. This alternative provides for 

high-speed rail with frequent service operating on 

dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings, which 

best meets the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA 

dismissed the other two Corridor Alternatives; however, 

FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the 

exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice 

of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South 

Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. All comments 

regarding Preferred Alternatives will remain a part of the 

project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 

FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also 

be provided on the project website. Project Sponsors and 

funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified 

to date.

Name/Title: Scott Neisler, Mayor

Agency: City of Kings Mountain, North Carolina

I want to talk about the total project, really. I became aware, on a recent visit to Atlanta, that we are not 

going to be able to construct enough lanes to take care of all the traffic that needs to be taken care of, 

so rail traffic is another means for people to be transported. I have read the study. I think it's a very 

good study. It's obvious that the Crescent route is not the optimum route, even though it's the 

cheapest. But I do believe that the Greenfield does not take care of the population that it should take 

care of; therefore, I'm for the I-85 corridor. It's where the population resides. I believe it will take traffic 

off of I-85. I think it's the best option for us. I obviously would also like, because I'm from Kings 

Mountain, North Carolina, to be able to have a Park and Ride from the west of Charlotte to be able to go 

to Atlanta. So I would like to have a station placed in Kings Mountain as well as Gastonia, then they have 

the one at the Charlotte Douglas Airport and then the Gateway. Let me think if there is anything else. So 

I believe that there could be a smorgasbord corridor made up at Greenfield when it makes sense for a 

Thank you for your comment and for your interest in the 

Project. FRA has selected the Greenfield Corridor 

Alternative as the Preferred Alternative in the FEIS/ROD. 

This alternative provides for high-speed rail with frequent 

service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade 

roadway crossings, which best meets the Purpose and Need 

of the Project. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, including the City’s preference for the I-85 

Corridor Alternative; however, the exact alignment of the 

Greenfield Corridor Alternative including the route into 

Charlotte will be defined in a future Tier 2 analysis. FRA 
Comment Response

right-of-way and I-85, because of picking up the population, to lessen the cost of the I-85 corridor 

because it's 15, 16 billion dollars and the other is 6 to 7 billion. I think that's about all I want to say. The 

time for passenger rail is now. So it might be that we start a service on the Norfolk Southern route first, 

just to get it started; to get people used to being on rail. Even though it takes longer, it's much more 

convenient and much more relaxing than being on 85, and I think it would relieve the 85 congestion. 

Somehow we have got to convince Norfolk Southern that it can be a money-making venture for them. 

They have been unwilling to talk about passenger rail, yet their tonnage for coal freight has been going 

down. Why can't we put passenger rail on to make up the difference of the losses from coal freight?

dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while it performed 

better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, the 

geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to 

reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and 

attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also expressed 

concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, 

particularly through South Carolina. North Carolina DOT and 

South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. As the 

Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider 

studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the 

Greenfield Corridor to allow easier access to the service. If 

FRA participates in the Tier 2 analysis, FRA will work closely 

with the local jurisdictions and will take their interests into 

account as the analysis progresses. As of the date of this 

FEIS/ROD, neither a Project proponent nor funding has 

been identified for Tier 2 analysis, which could consist of 

one EIS covering the entire Project area or multiple NEPA 

documents covering discrete improvements.

Name/Title: Nicholas Zviovich

Agency: U.S. Representative Lucy McBath

I am working with a Congressman's office who is representing a district the proposed railway will pass 

through. We are trying to get as much information as we can regarding the proposal and I was 

wondering if you could send me the meeting materials or any other pertinent information as updated. 

Thank you and I look forward to hearing from you soon! Please contact me at: 

Nicholas.Zviovich@mail.house.gov

Thank you for your comment and for your interest in the 

Project. Updates on the Atlanta to Charlotte Tier 1 EIS can 

be found at the GDOT website at 

http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoCharlotte or 

through joining the GDOT Atlanta to Charlotte mailing list 

by emailing AtlantaCharlotteHSR@dot.ga.gov to receive 

periodic project milestone updates. On November 11, 2019, 

GDOT staff had a call with staff from U.S. Representative 

Lucy McBath’s office. During the meeting, GDOT staff

shared the meeting materials from the Atlanta to Charlotte 

Tier 1 DEIS Open House. 

Name/Title: Alex Mitchem, City Administrator 

Agency: City of Auburn, GA

The City of Auburn would like to be considered for a surface transportation station/connection to the 

nearest rail station to enable its citizens to benefit from the proposed Atlanta to Charlotte Rail service. 

The City would like to be included in any network based on the final plan chosen for deployment. Please 

contact us if you need additional information on the City and its proposed plans that can include a 

station in a mixed-use development. The station would offer retail opportunities and excellent last mile 

connections. Contact Alex Mitchem, City Administrator or Jay Miller, City Planner @770-963-4002.

Thank you for your comment and for your interest in the 

Project. FRA has selected the Greenfield Corridor 

Alternative as the Preferred Alternative in the 

FEIS/ROD. This alternative provides for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without atgrade roadway crossings, which best meets the Purpose 

and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives; however, FRA and GDOT did leave 
Comment Response

open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta 

(one of which – the CSX Approach - could potentially 

support a station in Auburn) and confirmation of the route 

into Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the 

choice of propulsion technology. As the Project continues to 

develop, municipalities could consider studying the 

feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield 

Corridor to allow easier access to the service. If FRA 

participates in the Tier 2 analysis, FRA will work closely with 

the local jurisdictions and will take their interests into 

account as the analysis progresses. As of the date of this 

FEIS/ROD, neither a Project proponent nor funding has 

been identified for Tier 2 analysis, which could consist of 

one EIS covering the entire Project area or multiple NEPA 

documents covering discrete improvements.
Tier 1 DEIS Public Comment Matrix with GDOT 

and FRA Responses to Public Comments
Date Type Submitted Comment GDOT and FRA Response

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield is a horrible option. Just from viewing the maps, it looks like Georgia is just looking to get to Charlotte in record time at the expense of 

South Carolina and South Carolinians. And, cutting in to access GSP runs rail lines into Five Forks - one of the most popular Greenville suburbs and 

recently ranked the number one place to live in all of South Carolina (see Niche.com). No way there won't be a huge fight. If you select Greenfield, 

every local, state and federal election will have this as an issue. We will organize. We will get environmental groups involved to protect our rivers 

and wildlife. You don't need this kind of fight and the delays it will cause. Please chose I-85 option or revamp the Crescent option so it can be highspeed.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study. 

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern 

Crescent because the corridor’s geometry limited maximum speeds, generating travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and 

attracting lower levels of ridership. FRA dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while the I-85 performed better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, the 

geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also 

expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South Carolina. Finally, the I-85 presents engineering challenges 

due to corridor constrains around Greenville, SC that would require the Project Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the 

Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the EIS. 

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Having another reasonably priced alternative between Atlanta and Charlotte is a must in the future. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Please implement a version of this project. In my opinion rail travel is an essential option for our nation's function as climate change continues. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Build the high speed rail with a stop in Anderson !!! After living in Germany for the past 9 years affordable high speed rail service between these 

two major hubs would alleviate a lot of traffic and make air travel viable for many more people. Modern high speed trains are game changers.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes yes and yes! Light rails are a great way to fight climate change and are a cheaper alternative to flying. A stop in Tucker would be awesome! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.This Project would be an intercity rail project. 

Light rail refers to urban rapid transit systems.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I hope that there are stops along the way so that it serves the whole public other than just the two end points. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Would like to see path through Greenville, SC, on way from Atlanta to Charlotte. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Sounds like a great plan Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I think it’s a good idea. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Atlanta is drowning in traffic. Please do ANYTHING and EVERYTHING to add more transit, especially high speed rail like this. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I’m thrilled that this is a possibility for Anderson County! I’m a county native and lifelong upstate resident, so I can attest firsthand to the traffic and 

congestion that come from the Atlanta to Charlotte I-85 corridor. It would be wonderfully convenient, environmentally friendly, and measurably 

safer for our citizens if we were to take advantage of such a development!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Bringing passenger rail back to Tucker would be great! Tucker is easy to get to from all major roads and is an up-and-coming city. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I think a corridor transit rail to Charlotte would be a great idea. Charlotte is beginning to boom and it would give Atlanta a great way to get there 

fast.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

High speed rail options like this make SO MUCH sense. Please, please, please - do this! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I love the idea of high speed rail to Charlotte and beyond. Tucker, GA makes sense as a hub due to the easy access for the Metro Atlanta area. 

Tucker is 20 minutes from anywhere, has a strong and supportive local government and there is room for it.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I am commenting in support of this proposal for a train. Many people commute and this would offer an alternative to driving. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

I am all in favor of this system, as long as it reduces our carbon footprint and overcrowded road system by reducing automotive use. To use it as a 

means to attract more people to these areas would be a waste of energy and money.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

It’s good initiative to have speed rail route between Charlotte to Atlanta Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfeld or 85 option. All three are great options. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Please make this a reality, the sooner the better, and take it from airport to airport if at all possible. We can't continue to add more cars and 

concrete on this corridor. I love the most scenic route. I took the high speed train from Avignon, France,to Paris last summer. Sleek, quiet, efficient, 

a piece of cake!!!so glad people are thinking ahead instead of just ten years down the road. Get some traffic off the road and make it convenient 

enough for people to use it. Please look at places besides America to see the efficient and effectiveness of these high speed trains.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

I regular travel by train between Atlanta and Raleigh (visiting my family). The seat pitch better then flying for my 6'5" frame and the fare is often 

cheaper. Generally I catch the Crescent on a Thursday night after work and take it to Greensboro . I then layover for the Carolinian to Raleigh. I'll 

catch a movie with my family and return the next day in the 3:00 Piedmont and transfer to Greyhound, arriving in Atlanta Sunday morning around 3 

so I can make work at 9:30 that morning. Would love more rail options that connect with the NC trains. A late afternoon departure from Charlotte 

would mean I could forgot returning by bus.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

Rapid rail between Atlanta and Charlotte would relieve the congestion on I-85! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a great idea! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

We really need this in our area not only for business growth, but for the transport opportunities it will bring to our population. There is no easy way 

to get to Atlanta or Charlotte without fighting traffic accidents and delays.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

This would relieve traffic headed to Atlanta and Charlotte Airports. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

I travel from Charlotte to Atlanta by car on a frequent basis to visit my child (college student at Emory University). My husband, who is employed by 

Bank of America, works at the Charlotte based bank headquarters but he also occasionally works at the Atlanta Bank of America office. In addition 

to Atlanta, we have family in Northern VA and Richmond whom we visit regularly. We would HEARTILY welcome a faster, safer and more efficient 

way to travel to all of these locations. This corridor is one that is long overdue for improved infrastructure and mass transit. There would certainly 

be enough demand to make it a worthwhile investment, especially if the fastest option is chosen.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Great idea. Have been awaiting this matter to move forward. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Wish to hear more. Athens is a natural hub but Toccoa has history with the rail. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

This is the most cost effective route. It it much needed for our state. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

A railroad line connecting Atlanta to Charlotte would be positive for both states. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Haven't to long been finding out about this. What do I need to do? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Please eliminate the "No Build Alternative." This corridor desperately needs high speed rail service. I can see merits in all three options, but 1-85 and 

Greenfield Alternatives seem preferably given travel time, number of round trips per day, and forecasted annual ridership. This project should 

prioritize the ability to reduce car trips and airline travel along this corridor and present rail as a viable option. Existing conditions (one round trip per 

day via the Crescent Line) are pathetic and too restrictive and expensive for anyone to utilize, even those of us highly motivated to take trains for 

sustainability reasons.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. 40 CFR § 1502.14(c) requires that 

Environmental Impact Statements include an analysis of the no action alternative.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

This project seems like it would be a great idea because it would connect areas that greatly need public transit connection options. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Everyone loves trains  Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I enthusiastically support high-speed rail between Atlanta and Charlotte. Passenger rail is the most energy-efficient way to transport persons. If this 

service were provided, travelers would find it much easier and more convenient than air travel or driving between these two cities. Passenger rail is 

a pleasure that few Americans are conscious of any more. For the sake of our planet, that needs to change.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Strongly support the alignment that enables the high speed option. The project is worthwhile only if it reduces the travel time to Charlotte 

significantly.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

This would make it easier to visit family in the Atlanta, Commerce, Winder areas Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Would definitely take advantage of a high speed rail from Atlanta to Charlotte Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the creation of a high-speed rail in Georgia. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes! Please! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

Looks like a great opportunity for the upstate. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

We need high speed train Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

We want the high speed rail service in Anderson! It would be an amazing asset that my family would use often. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

Wonderful idea and needs to happen. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

Just incredibly excited about the possibility of this! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

I don’t want to see another Greenville but a rail system in Anderson would be a big boost fore the economy of Anderson Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

Please continue your work on building a real transit system in our region. I fully support financing and building high-speed rail that connects Atlanta 

to Charlotte and other regional cities. Functioning transit helps our economy and should be supported by government.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I think any of the high speed transit options would be fantastic! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the idea of having alternative travel options for long distances is always a good plan. I having been wanting a highspeed rail train in GA for so 

long. It would provide a great option for exploring other areas of GA and NC with out having to plan for driving. Also it expands the options for flight 

travel when other airports can be accessed with having to drive.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I propose a high speed railway. I think it’s an excellent idea & great use of money! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I support having a high speed rail stop in Anderson and would use it frequently to visit grandchildren in Charlotte and attend events in Atlanta. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

Please refer (below) to a recent letter I sent to Sir Richard Branson concerning this very topic: Dear Mr. Branson, Thank you for your commitment to innovation in the transportation industry. Having 

spent most of my adult life working in transportation, I understand the importance of developing better, more efficient methods of both human and cargo transport. I often wonder why more people 

don't use trains as part of their daily commute mix and the answer I have come to is that trains, in their current form, do not fit seamlessly into our transportation equation. If people are to embrace travel 

by rail, then travel by rail must bridge the gap conveniently and cost effectively between air travel and travel by automobile. My idea is to build a Maglev train system down the median of major interstate 

corridors across the United States. By incorporating the train system into the existing interstate system, a high visibility, convenient bridge between automobile and air travel can be achieved. For 

example, a major north / south, East Coast interstate in the U.S. is I-95. My vision would be to build a north and southbound ELEVATED Maglev track down the median of this interstate with off / on ramps 

for destinations along the way. Because a Maglev does not require an engine to pull a series of cars, each Maglev car would operate independently. A scenario of how this would work is as follows: A 

passenger in New York City wants to travel to West Palm Beach, FL as cheaply, conveniently and expediently as possible. They choose to drive their automobile to the nearest southbound Maglev 

terminal, park, buy a ticket from a Kiosk, and wait for the next southbound train to arrive. They enter the train car, take a seat and begin their journey. Along the way the passenger decides to exit the 

train in Savannah, GA to stretch and grab a bite to eat. They push a button conveniently located within their reach which instructs the car to stop at the next exit. The car exits the main Southbound track 

and enters the station in Savannah, GA. The passenger exits the car, inserts their ticket into the passenger exit kiosk, has lunch and uses the restroom in the terminal, then purchases another ticket and 

catches the next southbound train and continues on to West Palm Beach. The passenger's credit / debit card is charged appropriately for the mileage traveled. Each terminal will offer electric vehicle 

rentals and / or have waiting taxi cabs to make it a snap to reach their final destination. For the return home, the passenger would drive their electric rental car to the nearest northbound Maglev terminal 

and repeat the process for the journey home. Separate terminals could be provided at each off ramp to accommodate cargo only Maglev cars. A project of this magnitude would require a partnership 

between the Federal Government, State Governments, and private corporations. My thought is that the main track infrastructure would be designed, constructed and maintained by a joint partnership 

between the Federal and State governments such as how the current interstate infrastructure has been built. Cities would own and operate each terminal and would contract with private corporations to 

provide food, shopping and rental cars. Tech companies would compete to provide ticket kiosks and traffic management software and hardware. Utilities would own, operate, construct and maintain the 

electrical systems which power the trains. Transportation companies would own, operate and maintain each individual train car. An agreement on how the ticket sales from each passenger (or cargo 

shipment) will be divided among each partner would obviously have to be negotiated. I realize this is a very simplified explanation of a very complex idea, but I hope that I have at least succeeded in 

transferring a comprehensible vision from my mind to yours. With highest regards, Rob Danford

The Project's Purpose and Need (which appears in Section 3 of the Executive Summary) identifies the "Purpose of the Project is to improve intercity passenger 

travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region's transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and reliability through high-speed 

passenger rail system.". This is a proven, well-established technology. FRA and GDOT wish to avoid delay in implementing service in the corridor while new 

technology is developed, tested, and refined.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I travel by train a lot - I would love to see the federal and state authorities force freight companies to give Amtrak and any future passenger rail full 

priority and RoW.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Legislatioin giving priority to passenger rail over 

freight rail is outside of the scope of this Project.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support moving forward with the high speed rail project connecting The I-85 corridor major cities. I look forward to following. The progress 

of the project and will continue to offer up my opinion when GDOT asks for public input.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I am personally very excited about the prospect of a passenger rail system from Atlanta to Charlotte and am very interested in hearing more 

concerning this plan. This seems to be a positive initiative and a forward-thinking plan for the state that will benefit a large population of citizens 

across Georgia and the Carolinas.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

A rail line from Charlotte to Atlanta through Greenville is a wonderful idea. There are daily issues on I-85, which is inadequate for the traffic it 

handles. The route that stops at GSP seems like a good idea, but any of them would be an improvement. I would use it, providing the times are 

convenient.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I am for the train from Charlotte to Atlanta and would like to see it move forward immediately. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I am greatly in favor of more rail options in GA. A properly implemented rail would be the best traffic-reducing solution. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

High speed rail Charlotte to Atlanta. We're decades behind Europe. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this would be a great transportation idea for our SC upstate. A lot of people don't like driving through Atlanta and Charlotte. This would make 

such an easier way getting to/from the airports.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this would be an amazing idea! I just would want you all to make sure it wouldn’t end up being like the mess out in California. I also think 

stops in Athens and Clemson would be a cool addition. To better serve college students in these isolated college towns.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

Please have a stop in our beautiful Anderson County! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes, I believe that transportation would be much easier and cheaper.. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

Public transportation from Athens to Atlanta is much needed. It would bring revenue, with people shopping and traveling on both ends of the train. 

This can't come fast enough. 2050 is actually too far out. This was needed in 2000.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

In favor of high speed rail Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I fully support an Atlanta to Charlotte rail. Connecting two major airports will increase options for travelers to pick the best flights for their needs. It 

would also increase and diversify job opportunities in each city and those along the corridor.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

Would definitely use a rail network between ATL and CLT Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

About time. Just do it already. It's time to truly live up to the reputation of being a one of the largest metropolitan area in the country. Atlanta's 

metro transportation outreach to surrounding areas is nil.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this is a great idea that has tremendous potential to reduce automobile traffic along the I-85 corridor around Charlotte, Greenville, 

Spartanburg, and Atlanta as well as the likely reduction of automobile fatalities along this stretch of the interstate system. As someone who travels 

to Atlanta annually for DragonCon I relish the day when I no longer have to make that drive, especially since I had an accident a year ago in which I 

was rear ended by a semi-truck and trailer. If passengers have the ability to bring luggage, assuming storage locations will exist within the train cars, 

then I say bring it on!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love to see a high-speed rail link down the CLT to ATL corridor. I fly out of ATL plenty, and I would ride the link instead of driving. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Please make this happen. It's time for the US to join other developed nations. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

This is absolutely a wonderful idea and I would love to see high speed rail from Atlanta to Charlotte connect through the Anderson/Greenville area. 

Ideally with a stop in Anderson. America is so behind the times on high speed rail and Anderson would greatly benefit from this connection to two 

major cities.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

This is absolutely a wonderful idea and I would love to see high speed rail from Atlanta to Charlotte connect through the Anderson/Greenville area. 

Ideally with a stop in Anderson. America is so behind the times on high speed rail and Anderson would greatly benefit from this connection to two 

major cities.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

This would be helpful for travel. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

This is absolutely a wonderful idea and I would love to see high speed rail from Atlanta to Charlotte connect through the Anderson/Greenville area. 

Ideally with a stop in Anderson. America is so behind the times on high speed rail and Anderson would greatly benefit from this connection to two 

major cities.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I think a Corridor stop in Anderson would be a great economic stimulus to our city. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

This is absolutely a wonderful idea and I would love to see high speed rail from Atlanta to Charlotte connect through the Anderson/Greenville area. 

Ideally with a stop in Anderson. America is so behind the times on high speed rail and Anderson would greatly benefit from this connection to two 

major cities.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Wonderful plan. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

A high speed rail line that stops in Anderson SC will benefit the community. Public transportation and access to Greenville, Charlotte, and Atlanta is 

something that I will welcome.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

It would be great for business in Anderson for there to be a stop. I would also love the opportunity to be able to travel to Atlanta or Charlotte for the 

day or weekend and not have to worry about traffic.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

This is absolutely a wonderful idea and I would love to see high speed rail from Atlanta to Charlotte connect through the Anderson/Greenville area. 

Ideally with a stop in Anderson. America is so behind the times on high speed rail and Anderson would greatly benefit from this connection to two 

major cities.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Great Idea! Please bring to Anderson S.C. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love to have the express stop in Anderson. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

This is absolutely a wonderful idea and I would love to see high speed rail from Atlanta to Charlotte connect through the Anderson/Greenville area. 

Ideally with a stop in Anderson. America is so behind the times on high speed rail and Anderson would greatly benefit from this connection to two 

major cities.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Let's do it! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

As a lover of trains and transplant from the Northeast, seeing this initiative warms my soul. I recently made the drive from Atlanta to Charlotte and 

thought, this would be so much lovelier on a train. As the roads become more congested with cars, I believe a line from Atlanta to Charlotte serves 

as a wonderful solution. I hope that the future project is environmentally friendly and affordable, but I am simply just happy that it is in the works. 

To whoever is reading these comments, I wish you the best of luck and know that you are doing great work!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe this is a great idea and I fully support this. The southeast needs to modernize its transportation system and a rail line between ATL and CHA 

would be great.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

GSP as a train and air hub seems optimal. We need this modernized option for transport. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a fantastic idea and I hope it happens. I’m from Atlanta and just recently moved to Anderson. I have many friends and family that have to 

travel to Charlotte on a regular basis and they constantly dread that commute because of traveling on 85. From Atlanta to around Commerce GA it 

is 2 lanes going North and South. There is constant traffic and delays, construction and 85 is in horrible condition and is causing extreme wear and 

tear on everyone’s vehicle. This would make traveling for executives much easier, less stressful, and it would allow more people from Atlanta, 

Charlotte and surrounding areas a quick and easy getaway. I think there should be multiple stops along the way to allow people to visit these hidden 

treasures that many people are not aware even exist. Until my Grandmother moved to Hartwell, GA I had no idea it existed, much less how beautiful 

the area around Lake Hartwell is. I had never heard of Anderson SC until I moved to Hartwell, GA. I never knew how much this area has to offer until 

I moved here for my Grandmother. This would bring more revenue into our city as well as other towns along the way. This would allow easy travel 

for families to visit other family members, and allow families that have Lake houses in the area a much easier way to just pack up and take a spur of 

the moment weekend trip. So many people in Anderson and other surrounding areas travel to Charlotte for business, entertainment, shopping, 

and for medical treatment. Putting in a High Speed Passenger Rail would make traveling to Charlotte much easier and safer. This is a great plan! 

Let’s make this happen!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

This railway is a fantastic idea. Mass transportation saves money, reduces traffic, and reduces carbon emissions from high concentration of driving. 

Especially coming from Atlanta, there are many major cities and hubs that could benefit from this rail system.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I love the idea. Public transportation is the way of the future. This will allow for so many opportunities- business, college, entertainment like football 

or concerts and tourism.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a very needed resource for our state. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I think it’s awesome! My husband has to travel for his job and it includes going to Charlotte. He typically drives but would take this without 

hesitation. Let’s make it happen!!!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this would be great for Anderson. It would bring in visitors and also would provide a quick way to Charlotte. Great idea! Let's do it! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to see the quickest route utilized. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to voice my personal support to continue to pursue this project of connecting Atlanta to Charlotte with Greenville as a designated 

midpoint. Such a plan would allow Greenville's growing population to access the larger surrounding cities in an economically and environmentally 

friendly way. By doing so, this promotes greater collaboration in the larger interstate area which would drive further growth and development, 

especially among the demographics that otherwise don't have access to moving between cities for opportunity. With focus on ROI in terms of 

population productivity, environmental resources, and construction costs, I imagine this project will have a great chance of succeeding. Thank you 

for allowing me to participate.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe this would improve the quality of life in this area by reducing commute times and reducing congestion. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

This is absolutely a wonderful idea and I would love to see high speed rail from Atlanta to Charlotte connect through the Anderson/Greenville area. 

Ideally with a stop in Anderson. America is so behind the times on high speed rail and Anderson would greatly benefit from this connection to two 

major cities.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

We need high speed rail! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

If it comes through Anderson, I'm sir it would be a welcome alternative. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

BUILD IT! We've been waiting for this since it dubbed the "Brain Train" over a decade ago. At this point I don't care which option you choose, but I 

would like that you would have better adoption and ridership if you routed through Greenville and Athens on the route.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Our community has a stop now. New route will give us new destination. Great way to expose our town. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I think a high speed rail ATL to Charlotte is a great idea. In support of it. We need one to Chattanooga too while you’re at it. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

A Tier 1 Combined Final Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision (Tier 1 FEIS/ROD) was issued for the Atlanta-Chattanooga corridor in August, 

2017, and is available on both GDOT's and the FRA website.This is similar to this FEIS/ROD for the Atlanta-Charlotte corridor. To date, no funding has been 

identified for a Tier 2 EIS, the next stage in the Project Development process, for either corridor.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Just do it Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of rail system which is the most advanced as possible . Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I think speed should be the focus. If it takes just as long or longer than a drive or flight, it seems pointless Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Build it. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support this project. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in support of the high speed rail. It will give us an option for greater mobility I'm the region. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

We need more rapid transit and our environment needs more rapid transit. This would be a start. The Northeast US and Europe have very 

convenient and comfortable trains. If we subsidized trains like we do cars and planes, we could create a terrific transportation network.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

The Southern Crescent Corridor should not even be an option. The estimated number of travelers would kind of defeat the purpose of this project. 

The value i this project is keeping the most number of people of the roads.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

All in on rail transportation!! Especially anything that would cut traffic on I-85!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

This is to let you know that I am totally in favor of high-speed rail in the Southeast and believe it would do much to take cars off the road (meaning 

less Interstate traffic) and reduce air traffic (less pressure on airports and airspace).

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Please give citizens a transportation alternative... I e Europe has been setting an example for decades Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I would LOVE to be able t take a train to Charlotte and Atlanta. Please make this happen ASAP! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Trains are the future. We should embrace passenger rail like 100 years ago. Please build rail on the Southeast! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I work in financial services and spend a significant amount of time traveling between Atlanta and Charlotte. Every minute I spend driving between 

the two cities is completely lost productivity. Even if the route takes 1.5 times total travel time, I would not only utilize the service but increase the 

frequency with which I travel between the two metro areas.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a wonderful idea that my family has talked about for at least 20 years. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I wanted to affirm my support for the Atlanta to Charlotte High Speed Rail and also take the moment to support any other rail projects that GDOT 

may have planned.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Please start building high speed rail between Atlanta and Charlotte ASAP Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support the creation of high speed rail linking Charlotte and Atlanta to further fuel economic growth in the region. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Can't think of a smarter route than connecting the three airports. With parking, waits, security and tarmac congestion, it'd give travelers 

alternatives as the entire region connects.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the project. I am support projects that increase mobility in Georgia and increase connectivity. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

The plan that includes Tucker and Lawrenceville as a station is fantastic Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to see the rail from Atlanta to Charlotte. To ease more traffic I'm Atlanta, we should make a bypass around the city for vehicles coming 

from Chicago and NYC going to the airport or to Florida. An example is i540 in Raleigh going around the city to the airport.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I'm all for this! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Please please please do this. It will save millions in maintenence on roads (especially 316) and is much more sustainable than personal vehicles Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this is a great idea! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I do not think the Souther Crescent would be the smartest option. While it is cheap, I think the entire idea behind a train route like this would be to 

limit the time it takes to travel from Georgia to NC. I would much rather the DOT spend more money creating something convenient than less 

money creating something that most likely won’t be used as much.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Strongly support a rail option between these cities. Traffic and travel on 85 especially with the copious amounts of long haul trucks is congested and 

at time dangerous.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Charlotte to Atlanta PLEASE! I have so many friends in NC and the idea of this is amazing! I love it. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

One of the faster options is needed! I am in the metro Atlanta area 3 times a month at least and would love a travel alternative. Traffic into atlanta 

is awful and a solution is needed.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Need a 2 hr train from CLT to ATL Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Please implement the high-speed train route from Atlanta to Charlotte. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

It’s a great idea. So many people work in Charlotte / Atlanta / Greenville and live elsewhere. It would reduce traffic significantly for all three cities. It 

would also reduce wear and tear on roads.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

Wonderful would be great for both cities Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I think either of the tailways would help cut down on traffic. Also save traveling time. I would love to have one of these options worked out in the 

future.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

would love love love love to have this option available to us. i cannot begin to say how much nicer life would be with this feature. If this happens 

before i die, i hope the rail has stops at both the GSP and CLT airports

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

It would be beneficial to have a high speed rail to take you from Charlotte to Atlanta in 2 hours. I am a proponent of the rail plan in which it would 

only be a 2 hr window. It would be great, look at all the people who could commute from Charlotte to Atlanta and vice versa.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

My child plays travel soccer and there are no flights to Charlotte . The rail would help soccer familys so much. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I love the idea of a high speed train from Charlotte to Atlanta! Especially if it stops in Clemson and Athens, GA. Think of how many football fans 

would use it every weekend, not to mention students at those schools traveling home for weekends and holidays.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I favor fast rail from atlanta to charlotte through greenville Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

Very much in favor of this plan --- this should have been in the works a long time ago -- the 85 corridor will be one big parking lot before this is done. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I’ve worked in the Aviation and the Transit Rail industry, why would we not do this at any cost being that 85 is now over crowded and eventually the 

upgrades that are taking place will be inefficient by the time they finish them. Aviation will not only be to expensive but not practical. If we look to 

our European neighbors we can see that it works but we have to be willing to make the sacrifices now or we are only destined to become ever 

greater bogged down and further behind, must people in the upstate traveling to Ga. on the 85 death trap would rather stay at home as opposed to 

traveling that route, we have let the greatest rail system in the world go to waste as opposed to updating and maintaining. How long are we as 

educated people going to sit back and do nothing while we become so saturated with our individual killing machines that we can’t move period, 

move forward before it gets to the point that we have no option, and it cost way more that the present,

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I’ve worked in the Aviation and the Transit Rail industry, why would we not do this at any cost being that 85 is now over crowded and eventually the 

upgrades that are taking place will be inefficient by the time they finish them. Aviation will not only be to expensive but not practical. If we look to 

our European neighbors we can see that it works but we have to be willing to make the sacrifices now or we are only destined to become ever 

greater bogged down and further behind, must people in the upstate traveling to Ga. on the 85 death trap would rather stay at home as opposed to 

traveling that route, we have let the greatest rail system in the world go to waste as opposed to updating and maintaining. How long are we as 

educated people going to sit back and do nothing while we become so saturated with our individual killing machines that we can’t move period, 

move forward before it gets to the point that we have no option, and it cost way more that the present,

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

This project is long overdue, but is essential to accomodate growth along this corridor. I would prefer a more advanced technology be used. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

Infrastructure improvement is long overdue here in the Upstate. The growth along the Charlotte, Greenville, Atlanta corridor was planned under 

President Bill Clinton. Why has it taken so long to get more rail transportation? We see the high speed trains in China and Japan and shake our 

heads, wondering why we have not kept up with their transportation.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I’m for having a railroad! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

Please build the rail line Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

It's a very wise investment. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

This rail line would be so incredibly useful not only for Athens to Atlanta, but for going out of town to visit other cities with ease. Big yes for this 

project

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

Two of the greatest cities in the SE connected by light rail! It would be a game changer for CLT with regard to growth and development. Too many 

thoughts to put here, but I believe this is huge.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes to high speed rail. You can run it through my backyard. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

In favor of high speed railway from Atlanta to Charlotte Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I support a high speed train between Atlanta and Charlotte. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this is an INCREDIBLE idea. I would love having access to all of the surrounding airports, eats, concerts, sporting events, and other things so 

much easier. I think it would give the "Charlanta" region a tighter sense of community and bring new visitors to my area, the SC Upstate. Other 

countries have systems similar to this, and I think it is time that we catch up!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

Build the fast train from Atlanta to Charlotte. Would be great! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I support this initiative. It would become a source of revenue and would ease the environmental impact of car commuters. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I just want to express my support of any development. Even the longer route would be fantastic to those of us who commute using I 85 every day Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I am all I favor of light rail/ Hugh speed to Atlanta! One stop at airport or downtown Greenville is fine. The interstate is much too crowded and 

dangerous but we travel multiple times to Atlanta and to Charlotte!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

ATL - GREENVILLE - CLT Corridor would be an amazing option Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the rail to Charlotte would be wonderful. My sister lives there and I would love to see her more frequently. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

This is such a great idea. My only comment: if it’s not faster than driving, I don’t think I, or many others like me, will end up using it beyond riding it 

as a novelty. The faster the better for practical and functional use. Really hope this gets done. If you ever need any help from an MBA student, let 

me know.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I absolutely love the idea of the rail system and would use it to both Charlotte and Atlanta. I prefer having the convenience of the option which 

includes downtown Greenville, but any of the three options would be great! Hoping you guys can make this happen!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes! Please! I totally support this rail linking Charlotte and Atlanta! This is a wonderful idea and I’d use it EVERY WEEKEND. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I fully support this project. I hope to see it approved and funded as soon as possible. I used to live in both Atlanta and Charlotte and now live In 

Greenville. This train system would do amazing things for the I-85 corridor.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

This would be great to get to Atlanta from charlotte quickly. I would use this train to see the Braves and see family in Greenville and Clemson. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

please build this. traffic here is so bad with no future in sight. there are no buses either. a bus fits 50 to 70 people. a light rail even more. this makes 

traffic so much better. plus helps people who do not or can not drive.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes please do this. It is so common in Europe and Asia to get to different cities. I'm sick of driving or flying everywhere Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

This is an awesome opportunity and project. This is a much needed project that will pay dividends years down the road. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

A wonderful idea! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

We need high speed rail. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

It’s a good step , make everybody life easier by adding more trains to common locations Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Thank you so much for moving this forward. As a frequent traveler between Atlanta and Clemson area, and a heavy user of MARTA here in Atlanta, 

this would be a wonderful service. All corridor options seem viable, encourage choosing the most cost effective option. Thanks for your service.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I am highly encouraged to hear the DOT is considering a high-speed rail transportation alternative between Gainesville, Charlotte, and Atlanta- and 

am in favor of any public transportation we can improve between these larger cities!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

The option of a high speed rail is very exciting and would be well used. Public transport in the southeast is lacking, and this would be a huge step 

forward.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

LOVE this idea! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

In favor of high speed rail to eliminate traffic on I-85. Would use at least 4x year Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I love it !! Great idea. I'm willing to help pay for it too. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes for the CLT to ATL rail! This would connect two of the power house players in the southeast. CLT is the 2nd biggest banking center in America; 

having that connection to Atlanta would be a huge economic asset. Think of the investment that could flow between these two cities. It is a WIN!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

An essential step for reducing polution while increasing safety and convenience, a rail system such as this proposal is key. Build it and they will come! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I travel frequently to Charlotte for business, and this would be a game changer! I hope this project becomes a reality! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love to see the High Speed railway happen! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I am 100% in favor of a light-rail line. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I definitely support this fast train corridor. This is how country was developing Westwards and we have areas in upstate SC that clearly need 

development. Linking people only makes us stronger. This is a huge business as well as cultural development opportunity.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

High speed rail is, without a doubt, the only, best solution to travel in the future. Georgia is already lightyears behind North Carolina, with their NC 

Rail program. This plan would allow Georgians to tap into the value already in place with that program. However, as a former Cobb County resident, 

my heart breaks for an expansion of Marta to be a corollary to this!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to express support for the corridor project Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Long awaited and long overdue. All electric rail to and from CLT/ATL would be a great benefit for millions of people. Future expansion could include 

other big cities as well. It's time we stop taking notes from other countries and start Showing off our own high speed rail capabilities. This is just the 

beginning of endless possibilities. Find a way and I'll support it. Thank you!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I absolutely love the idea of having a train connecting Charlotte to Greenville to Atlanta. Just think how much less traffic there would be on the 

highway!! And it would be so incredibly convenient. I really hope this works out in the next few years!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I think it is absolutely imperative to develop a transportation line though Greenville to connect to two major metropolitan cities! It is conducive to 

support current & future growth. Why are we bringing in more jobs/employment, healthcare providers, & housing if we are not willing to create an 

efficient means of transportation to support the growth of Greenville.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Excellent idea, long overdue. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I live in Anderson but grew up in Simpsonville. As a massive Atlanta Braves fan, I just love the idea of taking the train to Atlanta with my kids and 

wife. I would be so proud of this! Also would love a stop in Anderson!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to see fast rail - I appose the Crescent route bc it does not save much time as compared to driving time. The other two options save 

significant travel time and I think would encourage travelers to use the rail service over driving a private vehicle.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

If you can get me from downtown greenville to downtown charlotte in under an hour on a consistent basis with reliable wifi access this project 

would change my life. I am a commuter to CLT 3 days/week for my job and spend easily over 6 hours in the car back and fourth and can be even 

longer if there is a single accident along the way. It’s lost time that my company and my life pay for... please seriously consider doing this project 

and doing it as quickly and efficiently as possible.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the light rail between Charlotte & Atlanta will be a great idea!! I reside in Greenville, but I am from Rock Hill, Sc. So to have the ability to 

travel from Greenville to Charlotte without putting miles on my car and constantly traveling on I-85 would be ideal. I would much rather pay a 

fare/ticket than a gas & be able to relax & ride. This will also allow me to visit Atlanta more frequently. I will not have to worry about traffic!!! This 

could really help improve the roadways between Charlotte & Atlanta as well!!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I think high speed rail is the only alternative. What a huge boost to the economies all along the route. I went to one Braves game and it took four 

hours to drive. I would definitely spend a lot more money in Georgia watching the Braves if I could get there in 1.5 hours. Anything slower I wouldn’t 

waste my time on.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

This would be a game changer. It would be so great for traffic, connecting to 3 cities, and it would help the working poor be able to get to needed 

job opportunities. Let's get it done!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Please provide an electric based service to serve the environment as well as public transit needs. I know many people who would utilize this service 

weekly if affordable and accessible. The time to travel does play a major roll as I would not use the service if it took longer for me to travel than by 

car. While the I-85 option seems appealing, it is already very congested and under construction leading to possible even greater delays in progress 

and more accidents and injuries despite the desire for forward progress. This line is NEEDED, please, let’s get this decision made and moving!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

 Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I simply wish to express my support for this project and never thought I'd see the day that such a project would be discussed in any serious capacity 

within the Southeastern United States. From what I'm seeing in certain online communities, much of the opposition to this project is based on socalled "not in my backyard"-ism; that is, people who are afraid that such an infrastructure project will bring crime or "undesirable people" from 

cities to outlying areas. I pray that too much mind is not given to such narrow-minded and antiquated views.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

We live in the Charlotte area and would absolutely love a high-speed train going from Charlotte to Atlanta. We love coming to the Atlanta area. 

Especially going to Braves games, to see Atlanta United Soccer, to go to a Falcons football game, and just go see things in the city. We love going to 

the Georgia Aquarium, the World of Coke, the old Olympic sites, Etc. We would get to come to Atlanta much more often if a high-speed rail was an 

option. I have a feeling a lot of people in the Charlotte area and throughout the state of North Carolina would feel the same way. We're highly 

supportive of a high-speed rail from Charlotte to Atlanta. Would love to see it happen!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Please drop the Southern Crescent and no diesel trains. Reasons why include the travel time is too slow with low ridership. You can drive just as fast, 

no benefit. Given the time frame of building and study diesel will be too expensive or unavailable.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the project. As someone who travels from the upstate of SC to Charlotte or Atlanta multiple times per month the idea of a train is very 

appealing

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenville/Spartanburg route would open up so many options, both for work and leisure, for this area. There are so many smalls towns within I85's shadow that have fell by the wayside that would suddenly experience growth due to this venture. On a personal note, my wife commutes over 

an hour one way several times per week for job in Spartanburg. This would cut here transit in half, allow here to use the time spent driving more 

productively, and allow for a much safer commute. There are many stories just like this. The route through Columbia only services that location, 

there is nothing else before of after. There are dozens along the I-85 route that would have quicker access to everything.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love to have this project brought to this area. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

High speed rail transportation would benefit counties, bring in jobs. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

This sounds like a great opportunity to expand the economic reach for GA, NC, and SC! Long trips can be avoided and allow for more time for people 

to shop, eat, etc., in all the cities this impacts. I do think that people need to be informed in more laymen terms and shorter pamphlets since the 

documents about the impacts are long and difficult to read to the average person.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing to state my strong support for this high speed rail line. This is something we have needed for a long time and which would change the 

game for domestic regional travel. It is a slam dunk.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

May help to reduce some traffic on I-85 and therefore some reduction in maintenance costs of it. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I am hugely in favor of this development. It is a logical decision to easily connect two of the premier cities in the Southeastern United States, 

enabling increased economic opportunity while simultaneously easing environmental pressure from excess personal vehicle use.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I wholeheartedly support this project. I often make a trip to Anderson and it is very painful to drive to and fro on 85 due to the endless construction 

and traffic tie ups. I hope the proposed system will make a stop in Anderson. I think such a system will encourage tourism between the two cities. 

There are lots of places I would like to visit in Atlanta and Athens, but would not dare make the drive to Atlanta. Traffic there is a real nightmare.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Please allow the high speed rail form Charlotte to Atlanta to happen. Would be a safer and faster alternative to cars. Also some people cannot drive 

and this would give them an opportunity to travel by other means

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

This project is an interstate corridor transit oriented development that will impact 3 states positively and reduce the traffic corridor for 3 states. Any 

route that produces a travel time of 3 hours or less that will bridge the economic divides for these 3 states when competing for economic 

investments from major urban centers throughout the U. S.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Having traveled extensively in Europe, S. & C. American as well as North America, the time is past for us to begin embracing mass transit that is 

efficient, approachable economically, and safe. With continued development of the I-85 corridor from Atlanta to Charlotte, there is a definite need. 

Although I am homeowner in rural Georgia, I'm also a community leader that sees the need for this project to proceed as soon as possible.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Got to do something. Population and economic growth is turning I-85 into a parking lot all the way from Charlotte to Atlanta. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Looking at the Southeast Corridor proposed high speed rail system. GVLtoday said you were looking for feed back. If it doesn't stop in the main 

metropolitan areas it will be harder to use. In Europe, I loved the TGV and being able to hop city to city so fast. The Southern Crescent line is TOO 

SLOW, 5 hours does not make riding a train worth it, but it has the best stop options. 85 route, also has most of the best stops, but fear of clogging 

up the highway with more traffic comes to mind. It is already a big mess. Greenfield is a good alternative, however you are not dropped off at any 

main hubs, Downtown Greenville, Spartanburg, close enough to the city centers where a day trip, which would make sense. I think you are getting 

close. Keeping costs lower, access to stops, and time of trip are extremely important. No one will ride a train if they can hop in their car and get 

their faster.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

There is tremendous public support for this in Greenville, SC. The best option would be the one that goes through or close to downtown Greenville 

and is the fastest to get from Atlanta to Charlotte. Very few people will take a train that takes longer to get from ATL to CLT than driving in a car.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

This project is very much needed in its intended areas to alleviate road congestion. Additionally this mode of transpiration will allow commuters the 

ability to rest and relax as they are safely transported to their desired destination by professional railroad crews. Please fully consider this forward 

think concept.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love and would use high speed (200 mph+) rail between Charlotte and Atlanta. I live in Greenville, SC and have 5 locations of my company 

along the I-85 corridor from Raleigh to Atlanta. I hate making the drive so I would us a rail option a lot.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I just wanted to take a moment to comment on what an amazing idea this is and how ecstatic I would be to use this type of transportation. I 

absolutely love this idea.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Whichever route is best I don't know, just please do this, I live near Anderson SC and I would travel to Charlotte and Atlanta so much more often if 

this ever happens, I don't very often now because I hate driving on I85, the way people drive these days is insane.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes, I think it’s a great idea to have a high speed rail between ATL and Charlotte NC. I would vote for it on ballot Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Love this idea. My request is that if the government moves forward on this project, that it’s done well the first time and won’t waste taxpayer 

money on cheap materials. Please add a stop in Spartanburg SC.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I fully support this project. Having rail service to the Charlotte/Atlanta area would promote more travel to these cities. If the rail stopped at the 

major venues on each end; it would prompt me and others to attend events there. Today, the traffic just makes it too difficult to attend.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing in SUPPORT of the high speed rail between Atlanta and Charlotte. For business and personal reasons, the commute from Charlotte to 

Atlanta is one that I make occasionally and would certainly make more frequently with the option of a high speed train. The train would empower 

me to live in either city and work in the other given my company provides flexible days in the office. My family in NC would also be much more 

likely to travel to Atlanta if it did not mean a long drive and sitting in traffic. If approved, I would be delighted to be a loyal passenger!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Depending on the cost to the rider and departure times, I support this initiative. As a person that lives in the Greenville, SC area, I believe it could 

be very beneficial to the area. Often times we'd like to go to Atlanta or Charlotte, or Athens for a sports event, concert, shopping, etc... It would be 

extremely convenient to simply get on a train and ride to our destination. It could allow for being productive on the train, rather than driving the 

car and sitting through traffic. With trains being more environmentally friendly than cars and planes. I think this is a wonderful step taking 

additional cars off the road and reducing carbon emissions.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a needed project! Has been for several years. Follow Greenville’s way and go with public and private $. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a great idea, and very much needed. It increases availability to airports, and would lead to me making more trips to Atlanta for sports, 

entertainment, etc. I currently avoid Atlanta (except connecting at the airport) at all costs due to traffic. I would come to Atlanta much more often if 

this is in play. Build it tomorrow! Great idea!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I hope this happens. It's a great option for travel and will be good for the environment. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

We are totally supportive of a rail link between Charlotte and Atlanta running through Greenville. Each time we travel to Charlotte or Atlanta on the 

heavily trafficked and dangerous I85 we say to each other.....If only there was a reliable and efficient train service between these cities! We have so 

enjoyed the convenience and safety of trains in Europe. Please let’s get serious and proceed with this necessary public service here.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a fantastic idea....any route chosen should include stops at all airports including G SP. 5is would great,y reduce traffic on our interstates and 

pollution. And safer than driving 85. We have been hoping for this for years and it would get tremendous use for these areas...people from 

Greenville always driving to clt or Atlanta for flights....Please make this happen!,,

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

The railway system is long overdue here in the Upstate. I hope it could help many of us who commute into downtown Greenville daily for work from 

all around the Upstate, as well as give us a quicker, safer, easier way to travel to NC and GA for events.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to see a high speed rail system connect these cities. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe speed and quickness of commute should be a high priority. Limiting the number of stops to 2 or 3 so that commute times between the 

different cities make it a truly viable alternative to driving. The commute radius could expand and allow anyone to live and work in any of the three 

cities! The municipalities and counties surrounding the route would have plenty of time to figure out how to connect to the stations and get their 

citizens access.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes to more trains. Always. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the high speed rail is something the southeast has been needing for a long time. I would utilize it all the time going from Greenville to Atlanta. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I find this to be one of the most effective ways Europe and other areas of the United States create making transportation easier for people leaving 

cities and traveling around inner cities. It is important we have a railway system for environmental growth not only for our economy but also for our 

climate change. I say yes to a railway system that will benefit all people.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I have anxiously been awaiting this results of this study. This region needs a rail system. Build it and we will come. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

If the benefits of this project are truly to be realized, then the fastest corridor should be selected. The Southern Crescent, being the slowest, offers 

no real benefits regarding travel times, and travelers will have the convenience of their own personal vehicles for the trip. This defeats the purpose. 

 Additionally, the last mile transportation network must be considered, as travelers will need an easy way to reach their final destination.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I think a high speed rail service from Charlotte to Atlanta would be beneficial. It would help alleviate some of the traffic. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I am a physician and I lead the South Carolina Upstate's only program for chronic pain, headache, and concussion for children and young adults. I am 

continually appalled at the rate of death and disability from motor vehicle collisions along the I-85 corridor between Atlanta, Greenville, and 

Charlotte. On a daily basis I treat young people experiencing life-altering conditions resulting from car collisions. South Carolina has the highest rate 

of traffic deaths per capita per distance traveled in the US (https://www.iihs.org/topics/fatality-statistics/detail/state-by-state), and Greenville 

County has the highest rate in the state. I wholeheartedly and enthusiastically support the prospect of an alternative to driving on the I-85 

corridor. In addition to the environmental, economic, and logistical considerations, the public health cost of the continued rate of death and 

disability from motor vehicle collisions needs to be counted as a cost of doing nothing. The public and personal health savings, reduced death and 

disability amongst young and healthy workers, and the value of protecting our neighbors is an economic and moral imperative that must be 

considered for this project. From my view, moving as many people as safely and effectively as possible between these cities is the priority. A route 

that is cheap, but inefficient, will not reduce driving along this corridor and will be the one that does not save as many lives. Please consider the 

health savings, worker productivity, and protection of life in all feasibility and economic evaluations for this project.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of a high speed rail line between Charlotte and Atlanta, and would use the service regularly. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Thank you for pursuing more mass transit Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to have a rail system to Atlanta and Charlotte! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Please start the project we need fast trains from Washington to Atlanta Thank you very much. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love if... we could have a quick connect, Greenville to Atlanta! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe the “char-lanta” Rail is a great idea. Potential for increased revenue in each city, more job opportunities, decrease amount of cars traveling 

85, and opportunity for better healthcare for patients who need specialized care.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

My family would absolutely take advantage of this line if it were to be put in place. We currently own homes in Metro Atlanta and Greenville, SC and 

have family in Clemsom and Spartanburg. We would love to be able to avoid 85 traffic to take our kids to see their grandparents!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

As someone from NC that lives in Atlanta I LOVE this idea! I know my family and I would make the trip to NC much more often is this were the 

option!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

As someone who has grown up in Greenville and seen it’s growth in the past 10 years the new high speed rail would be icing on the cake. My family 

takes trips often to both Charlotte and Atlanta. Having this rail would not only cut travel time significantly but also make it more enjoyable no longer 

having to deal with the traffic especially when coming into Atlanta. Greenville is one of the fastest growing cities on the southeast and is booming 

with tourism. The rail would help accommodate this even more. I hope this project comes through!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Excited for the possibility of a rail system in our area. Much needed alternative means of travel. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Enthusiastic support for this project, and would love any further updates on the progress. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Highly favor light rail. I have been asking for this for years. Don’t want Greenville to turn into Atlanta ir Charlotte with car traffic. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love a high speed rail from Charlotte to Atlanta Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to have a rail route that connected Greenville to Atlanta and Charlotte. The train would be so much easier than driving on the 

interstate.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I commute to Greenville from Spartanburg every day for work. I would LOVE to be able to take a train for this purpose, and would be happy to pay 

to use the service. It would literally add 8 hrs/week for me to work/read/relax on the train.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I’m very interested in any information that is shared with the public regarding this project. I remember this being brought up years ago and was very 

excited about the idea. We have family in both the ATL and CLT eats and hope there would be a stop here in Greenville for us to utilize this railway. 

We lived in Europe for several years and LOVED the rail system.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Let’s move forward with this with a high speed electric line!! Wonderful project that will benefit all economies involved and help reduce road traffic 

also!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I’m very sure this is one of the most ambitious project for the states, I’m very sure in the near future we will be connected with Florida and will be 

one of the most important public transportation, please don’t stop this Idea is just one step to the future of the region.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

The importance of this project to the region cannot be overstated. It is essential that the long term benefits are explained so that people better 

grasp the value. The opportunity to incorporate spur lines at a later date to connect other cities could also be of great benefit. This needs to happen.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Very excited about this project. I live and work in Greenville SC, but commute to Charlotte NC 2-3 times a week. A rail system would make travel 

easier, and allow me to work while traveling. I think this is a fantastic idea!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I love the idea of high speed rail in the southeast region. It will only further encourage economic development and provide equitable transportation 

for all.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe this would create economic opportunities while also helping with environmental concerns. This would benefit so many. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this is an amazing idea and hope to see it come to fruition. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I would use and agree with building a high speed train between Charlotte and Atlanta. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Would think connecting the three airports ATL, GSP and CLT would be key. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I would definitely use the high speed rail between Charlotte and Atlanta if it took two hours or less. I love Atlanta but dont visit as often as i would 

like due to the drive.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love to see this happen Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to see high speed rail, as well as other public transportation, in Atlanta. It would be a safer, more eco friendly, and would bring more 

business to the area. Also, a train from Athens to Kennesaw or Atlanta would be fantastic. My commute is brutal.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

In reference to high speed rail service between Atlanta and Charlotte, I think that our community would greatly benefit. It would be an opportunity 

for us to network and engage in weekend getaways. I believe that it would also further connect us to the rest of the eastern seaboard.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

This is such a fantastic idea. I can't wait. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I know that we here in the east metro area would greatly benefit from high speed rail, not just to Charlotte (and by extension DC and beyond), but 

also just from around Lawrenceville to the city. The under 30 bracket (of which I am a part of) is getting really sick of having to own a car to do 

absolutely anything outside of our own towns, and would love to be able to take a train from here to Atlanta everyday instead of sitting in the 

increasingly conjested highways for up to 2 hours every morning.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I am fully in support of this project. It is about time that the state of Georgia undertakes bold action to reinvigorate the economies of the small 

towns that this proposed high speed rail would run through. While I understand where the 'but how will we pay for it?' crowd is coming from, but I 

believe the long term economic impact would lead to an absolute windfall for Atlanta, Georgia, South Carolina, and metro Charlotte. It is about time 

the Southeast has caught up with our Northeastern and European counterparts in effective long range rail travel. Most importantly, however, this 

would be huge from an environmental standpoint. We can recycle, manage our household temps, and drive hybrid cars all we want; but it will 

require wholesale, systematic change to wean us away from car travel and air travel that is without question destroying our Earth. Rail travel has 

been proven time and time again to be the most environmentally friendly mode of transportation. I implore the GDOT to consider this project and 

to not fall for the corporate veiled as fiscally conservative arguments that only benefit Norfolk Southern, Delta, and Big Energy in general. I am a 

voting Georgia citizen, and I support this long range rail project.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this is an amazing project and great idea Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Please support the high speed rail between Charlotte and Atlanta!!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I am 67 and have a sister that lives in Alpharetta Georgia. Two weeks ago a 4 hour trip turned into a 6 hour nightmare. Bumper to bumper traffic 

caused from construction and so many headed in that direction. There was one section approximately 15 miles that it was all one lane because 

construction had put up a wall. I told my sister that it would be a long time before I made that trip again. The light rail line would just thrill me and 

I would definitely ride and I am sure along with hundreds of others. Count my vote in for this project!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

High Speed Rail between Atlanta and Charlotte will be invaluable to both metropolitan areas. A few examples: (1) elderly folks (e.g. grandparents) in 

either metro, who have difficulty driving the distance or flying, will have a safe, fast transportation option between the two areas to visit family or 

friends; (2) connections between the economies of Charlotte and Atlanta will be greatly enhanced, and many of us that occasionally have to travel 

to the other metro for work will have a reliable, safe, fast option; (3) as someone who often drives on I-85 to visit family and friends in North 

Carolina, the reduction of traffic (and cost savings of further expanding road infrastructure) will be of great benefit to everyone in both metro areas, 

not just those who ride the train. The corridor should attempt to include other principal metro areas, such as either 

Gainesville/Athens/Lawrenceville, and Greenville in SC.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

This new rail connect is a MUST. Plan and build for OVER 100 + years out. Lay down new Track locations unless engineers can build above or 

alongside current lines

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I think it would be a terrific idea ot have high speed rail between Charlotte and Atlanta. This would be great for the region and great linking both 

cities more closely.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I am all for the construction of a rail line through the city. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in support of this initiative - high speed rail would be great for interregional economy (tourism, commerce/trade, business) Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Great news! Desperately needed, this would be a benefit to so many people. Additionally, this would benefit both the Charlotte and Atlanta 

business communities.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I fully support Atlanta to Charlotte rail initiatives. I have been making the trip back and forth between Atlanta and Charlotte for both business and 

personal reasons for over 35 years and have always commented that train service would be an excellent means of transportation for the route. 

With the growth of Greenville, train service along the Atlanta to Charlotte corridor would enable to the region to achieve connectivity rivaling that 

of the Northeast. Access to talent, resources, and industry would be unmatched.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support the proposed High Speed Rail initiative. This will provide much needed congestion relief from our roads, make Georgia an even 

more desirable place for business, and create good jobs and careers.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

In strong favor of high-speed line going to Charlotte. Would like to see a stop in Marietta or nearby to make it more convenient. We drive up that 

way often to see family. Thanks

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

love this idea Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

We absolutely need this rail line. The highways are at capacity, we need to decrease pollution from so many cars. We needed to act years ago. 

Don’t put it off any longer

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

High speed rails are the future. Make life better for our citizens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Excellent idea! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I am excited about the possibility of a high-speed rail line passing through the Greenville area. Being able to go to Atlanta or Charlotte by rail would 

make traveling simpler more economical for most.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

It will be awesome transportation! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

This is very needed! This will change everything. Thank you for having this be a possibility. Big potential growth for future and will most def pay itself 

off.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

PLS SAVE US FROM ATLANTA TRAFFIC Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I would LOVE for this train to happen. Great economic booster! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Please please build this service. With the upcoming SunTrust / BBT Bank merger connection between Atlanta and the North Carolina banking 

corridor becomes vital. High speed services like this proposed rail line will keep our region relevant for decades to come. This is well worth the 

investment to attract future generations of professional citizens.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Regarding the proposed high speed transportation from Atlanta to Charlotte, I think it is a wonderful idea. It would cut down on traffic and improve 

safety travelling from one city to the other. I do hope to see this ides come to fruition soon as it would make a lot of lives easier.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

The Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor is a great idea and long past due. My family is looking forward to this. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Highly supportive of the high speed rail between Atlanta and Charlotte. It would create new jobs, provide a convenient way to connect the two 

largest cities in the Southeast for business, and help the Southeast continue to plan for the future. They already have a high-speed rail in the 

Northeast connecting DC to Boston and it's about time the Southeast has one as well.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I enthusiastically support a highspeed rail line -- the first of many, I hope, between Atlanta and Charlotte. I want to see it built quickly and efficiently 

with every effort made to mitigate environmental damage as well as undergoing proper archaeological surveys.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I LOVE the idea of a high speed rail. While traveling in Europe & Asia, my husband and I ONLY use the rail system. It is more economical and 

environmentally friendly, plus it gets where we want to go in a timely fashion. I would love to see more rail lines "spider-web" off of a framework 

similar to the Interstate Highway System. And imagine how that would impact secondary education and the economy of an efficiently mobile 

workforce....

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Love IT!!! Studying is done, lets build! We need this badly! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to have non driving alternatives to get to Emory, entertainment, airport. We just don’t go anymore unless medical attention requires it. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Please build a train. We need it. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

great ideal for rail to Charlotte Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

High speed rail between Washington DC and Atlanta would only bring even more growth to all the destinations on the route. Apart from the 

financial undertaking there is absolutely nothing to lose. This would be groundbreaking for America in general, where we greatly lag behind Europe 

in terms of public transport.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

We need high speed rail, We talked to long! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I am highly in favor of this. I have moved from Atlanta(Marietta) to Charlotte. When I come to visit Atlanta, the traffic on 85 is always crazy. A rail 

would help!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of fast train from atlanta to Charlotte and back Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I would very much like the train from Atlanta to Charlotte Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

We need to join the CHARLOTTE Light Rail. it would increase business and travel to and from Atlanta. We need to really start thinking regional rather 

than locally. It would cut down in traffic and that would be a huge environmental impact. I would use it regularly. I have business and family there. 

So i am there 6-9 times a year. Please push for this connection. We need to really work towards growing out rail lines for transportation and 

economic growth from tourism.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Long time coming. Environmentally this is a no brainer. I drive to The Charlotte area twice a month, the traffic is horrible, not to mention the 

number of accidents is extremely high. I’m am 100% for this project. Dan Salter

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

What a great idea!!!! Full speed ahead!!!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I support a line that would be able to get between Atlanta and Charlotte in 3 hours or less and that would be the most profitable. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a great plan and project. This is a system that should have been installed and put into service 25 years ago. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Highspeed rail will be necessary infrastructure in the megaregions of the future. The sooner highspeed rail is installed across the Piedmont Atlantic 

region the better chance it has to compete in the future economy. Put this project on the fastrack and plan for expansion.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I think it is a great idea!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I would definitely for this . We need alternatives to combat traffic. Also great city to city especially for work meetings. Less cars on road this way Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the high speed train from Atlanta to Charlotte is a fantastic idea. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I have lived in Japan, and enjoyed riding the Shinkansin(bullet train). But the train system in Japan has been a part of their cultural transportation for 

decades. Not so in America. Our primary means of transportation are: 1. auto, 2. airplane, 3. bus. I think a major investment in speed rail train would 

require too much of a culture shift, and would not be profitable. Americans are not major train riders. A better alternate transportation investment 

for metro Atlanta would in my opinion be a 2nd regional airport in north metro area (near GA 400). A north metro regional airport would relieve 

some congestion for HJI Airport. Short regional flights to and from cities like Charlotte within a 300 - 400 mile radius of Atlanta would I believe be 

successful and profitable. In anticipation of 2.5 millions new residents during the next 30 years, Atlanta MUST develop a major alternate 

transportation source in order to maintain it status as an attractive major international city. Even speed rail train would be better than nothing, as 

long as the long term plan includes connection to other 300 mile radius city, in addition to Charlotte.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. The Project's Purpose and Need (which appears 

in Section 3 of the Executive Summary) identifies the "Purpose of the Project is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by 

expanding the region's transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and reliability through high-speed passenger rail system." This is a proven, 

well-established technology. FRA and the Southeast Corridor states believe that high speed rail will be quickly embraced when it is available. High-speed and 

intercity passenger rail service in several corridors in the Southeast is in various stages of planning. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Build it! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Please make this happen! It will be a huge help for so many people! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

We NEED this!!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

It will serve the most people at the highest speeds at the lowest cost. No brainer. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I think that this project will help this region connect with the northeast. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Highly supportive of the tram from Atl to Charlotte. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I very much support this initiative Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Absolutely for this project! I frequent Charlotte often. I've purchased a Peach Pass and it's fantastic for GA. The tolls in NC are horrible and SC needs 

some sort of help!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Excellent idea! I love it. And I envision a network connecting all states eventually. We would love to not have to fly or drive within shorter distances! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Proceeding with this project is important to the region. If the project goal is to reduce highway travel by people going between Atlanta and 

Charlotte, the driving factor in gaining ridership is speed. Travelers will accept slightly higher cost to transit if the mode is faster and realatively easy 

to access.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

As a college student approaching graduation, one of the biggest issues drawing me away from Atlanta is transportation. For the size of the city, it 

simply can’t currently compete with other similar sized cities on the east coast. A high speed rail line like the one proposed would keep young talent 

like me (and engineering student at the University of Georgia) in state.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this would be a great addition to the Atlanta area especially with traffic so terrible and flights can get extremely expensive to go to closer 

cities like Charlotte. I travel between to two frequently and would use this service at least three times a month

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

All for more public transit options. I have reduced visits to family in NC because of traffic and road issues. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to see an Atlanta Charlotte corridor. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Do it. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes please bring us into the 21st century and give us high speed rail. I would LOVE a bullet train all the way from Miami to Boston and this sounds 

like a great first step towards that. Yes please, I would love to take a train vs driving

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a great idea! Please do it! We need more transportation alternatives! This can only be positive! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

We are the greatest country in the World - why would we have inferior railways than Japan . Europe or China . Go for the fastest and we will be in 

Atlanta from Charlotte in less than 90 minutes door to door.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

The idea of rail transportation from Atlanta to Charlotte is appealing for a number of reasons (1) as mentioned the potential increase in jobs. 

Perhaps I overlooked it, but wondering how long would the commute be from Station to Station? And secondly the improved quality of air due to 

less pollution is healthy for the environment. I vote in favor of the rail system.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Love the idea of route from Atl to Charlotte! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love to see rail service ANYWHERE. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I love the idea of rail from Charlotte to Atlanta. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

for the love of gawd DO IT !!!!!!!!!!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Great idea. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love to see rapid transit between Atlanta and Charlotte. It would make my trip to see my sister much shorter and stress free. More 

importantly, it will relieve some of the traffic in Gwinnett county.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I support all three alternatives Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Just do it. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

My household would LOVE an improved passenger rail between Atlanta, Greenville, and Charlotte. We talk regularly about how helpful it would be 

to be able to more easily take a day trip to Atlanta to go shopping or eat at one of the many impressive restaurants there, without having to worry 

about the traffic associated with th drive home. Furthermore, we are business owners and it would open many doors to business development in 

either of those large cities.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I say YESSSSSSSS to the Light rail from Charlotte to Atlanta! I work in Atlanta and it takes me toooo long to drive back and forth! Plus it’s too 

expensive to fly. I know that this project will cost a lot, but I will be happy to input into a donation box for it. Plus you will gain all the money back 

from the transportation fair.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. It should be clarified that "high-speed rail", as 

called for in the Project's Purpose and Need Statement (in the Executive Summary), is very different from "light rail", a much slower technology typically 

employed within urban areas (including Charlotte).

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this project would offer a wonderful opportunity for the Southeast in general and offers excellent prospects for low-impact commutes for a 

large number of people.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the high speed option (Charlotte to Atlanta in 2 hours) is by far the best and will be the most able to pay for itself in the long run as it will 

definitely attract the most riders. Charlotte to Atl. in 2 hours? Yes, please! If the ride time by rail is the same as driving there however, I think most 

people would just prefer to drive.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I think all three corridors should be implemented. I wouldn't mind paying more taxes to have these options. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

highspeed rail Charlotte Atlanta Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Build the railroad Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I used to live in upstate SC. I've been dreaming of this for years. It makes so much sense. Just a vote for any of the corridors as long as you proceed. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I fully support this plan. Unfortunately, I will be shocked if NIMBY doesn’t kill this before it can happen. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Please make the heavy rail happen. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. This Project is an intercity rail project. Heavy 

rail generally refers to electric railways urban transit systems with the capacity to handle high ridership, such as the Metro in Washington, DC.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I can't make the Thursday meeting, but believe the fast track train from Charlotte to Atlanta is a great idea! I would love to see the full route from 

DC to Atlanta become available one day as well. Public money and taxes well spent in my opinion!!!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I wish to share my support of this project. As the southeastern region of the USA continues to grow and attract residents from other parts of the 

country, it is essential that our transportation infrastructure continues to grow and innovate. Automobile transportation infrastructure cannot 

expand in a meaningful way to keep up with demand, and as a result we have seen constant traffic jams at all hours of the day on the corridor from 

Atlanta to Richmond. I reside along he I-85 corridor, and work along this region, and face this traffic on a daily basis. It's evident that much of the 

traffic is going through the region, and is not just local traffic. This first step of creating a high-speed railroad option from Atlanta to Charlotte is 

essential if we wish to continue to attract and retain business, as well as the employees to make these businesses successful. If built strategically 

and correctly, with sensible stations along the route, it should alleviate a reasonable amount of automobile traffic along this corridor as travelers 

seek this convenient, safe, and affordable alternative. I look forward to reading more about the plan and actions that will be taken toward making 

it a reality.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I fully support the option of the rail that would allow for a 2 hour ride to Charlotte from Atlanta. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Do the passenger rail ATL - CTL Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

This would be a HUGE benefit for eh entire Southeast. I-85 traffic volume is becoming a hindrance to travel. Light Rail will enhance and stimulate 

both business and personal life in the entire region. I'm wholeheartedly in favor of this proposal.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. It should be clarified that "high-speed rail", as 

called for in the Project's Purpose and Need Statement (in the Executive Summary), is very different from "light Rail", a much slower technology typically 

employed within urban areas (including Charlotte).

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

It’s about time Charlotte and the US invested in some serious mass transportation! I hope this train line gets built soon and that it sparks the 

initiative to build more rail and subway lines in and around the city of Charlotte so we can finally stop depending on roads and cars to get us 

everywhere.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in support of the Atlanta to Charlotte DEIS. This is a long overdue improvement which will greatly connect the southeast region. I spent some 

time traveling along the NJ transit system, between Philadelphia and New York City, and desire the same ease of connection among our region. I 

can confirm that it is a huge resource for the people in that region - people use it daily for commuting to work, airport, leisure, etc. Our roadway 

infrastructure and vehicular use, especially I-85, can not continue to grow as population in this area continues to increase. So, alternative 

transportation measures should be continuously developed and implemented moving forward. This should be considered one step in many to come.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I think it's a great idea. Let's the big banks on both cities to pay for it. NC is starving for Atlanta talent. SunTrust just joined the mix. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Please make this happen!!! Make Atlanta a railway hub again!!!!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to see this line (and many others -- possibly a both-ways loop of the major Georgia towns?) become a reality. Train travel is great. 

Even better if we can bring along a pet on short trips with reasonable behavior expectations and crating. I suspect a great deal of our traffic habits 

are built around "But without a car how do I bring the dog?"

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

High-speed and intercity passenger rail service in several corridors in the Southeast is in various stages of planning. Operational characteristics, such as 

allowability of pets, will be determined much later. A Service Development Plan (SDP) was not developed for this Tier 1 EIS, but will be developed during a 

future Tier 2 environmental review, and will outline how the proposed high-speed rail service will be operated, dispatched and maintained. 

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love to see this come to Atlanta. Could alleviate much of the traffic on 75/85. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the ATL-CLT high speed rail Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of building the rail and providing more environmentally-friendly and mobility-friendly options. Please give the airport some 

competition and give us citizens an alternative to air travel.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

This is sorely needed. We must push for a world less dependent on cars. I don’t have a strong opinion on which route, we just need a route 

regardless!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the high-speed rail between charlotte and atlanta. I am in DC but support more high-speed rail in the US and would look forward to take 

the charlotte-atlanta speed rail for travel. I would come to the meeting in support if I were located there.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Please build high speed rail between Charlotte and Atlanta!!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I’m in favor of the highspeed train connection to divert traffic from the roads Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Please build express rail from ATL to Charlotte! We need more mass transit options. I would spend a great deal of money for this convenience 

instead of sitting in terrible traffic.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I agree with the need for the rail system I believe it would be beneficial not only environmentally but economically as well for each city represented 

on the plan. I drive from Virginia to North Carolina and if I had the opportunity to take the rail system I would and then continue my journey to 

Georgia.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I think a high speed train would be the best especially with Atlanta traffic being so bad. I travel to Charlotte almost every weekend, but if there was 

a train that could get me there in 2 hours I would use this vs sitting in traffic for 4+ hrs. I think it would take many people off the roads. Overseas 

country have already adapted this concept and idea. Not sure why as advanced as the USA is we are so far behind in Public transportation..

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the new track is the best option. All others are not a viable alternative to driving. This will also create jobs, increase tourism and revenue for 

all three states from beginning to end. This definitely should be considered. Maybe hire private contractors in the same fashion as used for 485 

completion.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a great initiative and developing this rail option for transit between Atlanta and Charlotte would be really beneficial. In addition to the 

obvious economic benefits of having fast transportation options between the 2 cities(both Charlotte and Atlanta have major Fortune 500 companies 

with operations in both Atlanta and Charlotte), a lot of us also have families that live in both cities and having a fast and cheap travel option would 

be extremely valuable. I really hope this initiative comes to fruition.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Fully support better rail options between Charlotte and Atlanta. Currently, the only option is Amtrak, which leaves Charlotte in the middle of the 

night. Anything would be better, but high speed rail would be amazing. It is so important to be able to travel between these two major cities in the 

south!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a perfect opportunity to loop in citizens of Georgia that don't have quick access to I-85. People that live near I-85 already have a rapid 

method to travel north - those in the eastern part of the state have to drive 1-3 hours additional time just to access an interstate.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this project is essential in providing integration to transportation offering lowest impact on climate. Providing link between Atlanta and 

Charlotte and further to DC will also integrate a growing part of the country. I strongly support the development.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

What a fantastic Idea that should have been implemented twenty years ago! We are so far behind Europe, Japan, and the rest of the world for rail 

travel. It is efficient, great for mass travel and saves the environment. Get busy building it!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Please build it. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

This is absolutely needed to connect high density metro areas. The one between Atl. and CLT would be a vital line to bring the US forward on a 

global scale.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I am support of all the alternatives but the 2 hour trip to Atlanta would be fabulous! The most hated drive in our family and we drive it at least once 

a month:-(

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

This area should have implemented alternate transportation methods years ago. Being a resident of the area for 40 years, I have seen this area 

grow. As a fan of the railway system, this method could have been used to elevate traffic issues years ago for the city and the region.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support the Charlotte to Atlanta portion of the high-speed rail corridor. There are countless tourism (including sports, arts, 

entertainment) and economic growth opportunities to be shared between these two cities. And it would serve to reduce traffic on I-85.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Think this would be EXTREMELY positive for the eastern corridor and both Atlanta and Charlotte respectively. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Thank you for holding these meetings to introduce this idea. As a DC native who has lived in Charlotte now for five years, I whole-heartedly support 

any effort to improve rail travel between DC, Charlotte, and Atlanta. Great cities around the world boast well-established public travel, and these 

three cities offer a dismal selection of options slower than driving yet as expensive as flying. I would encourage you to focus on lines with the fewest 

stops and the safest, fastest speeds. Towns can grow towards the train line as opposed to trying to mold the train lines to existing towns. I am out of 

town during your public meetings, but am very interested in being updated at your findings.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the USA is way behind the rest of the world in options for high speed rail. In Europe, they share the same network as existing rail routes. I do 

not understand how it would be so more expensive to leverage the existing rail ROW to expand the capability for high speed traffic. But there is 

benefit to linking into local transportation hubs at major metropolitan areas. High speed rail is much more efficient than automobile or air airline 

travel.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

This would be great for the region. Please move forward with the route that provides the fastest travel time. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

We need to utilize our under used rail system for commuters,tourists,etc. Environmental benefits galore and fewer cars on the road. What a GREAT 

idea! Let's Do it!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

My son and I were just looking at colleges in New England. Both URI and UNH have Amtrack stations on campus. A major appeal in that he could go 

to Boston, NYC or Philadelphia without having to deal with traffic. 50 years from now the South will have similar population and traffic concerns 

that higher density regions have. Atlanta already does. It would be so great to get to Atlanta in 2 hours.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to have a direct train from Charlotte to Atlanta that took less than the drive time. Currently, the public transport to Atlanta is limited. 

This train would be a huge benefit to living in Charlotte both for work and leisure.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Build the fast / quick one. If we're going to do this, let's do it right. And do it right the first time. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

AS A RESIDENT OF CHARLOTTE AND A FORMER RESIDENT OF ATLANTA, I WOULD FULLY SUPPORT A HIGH-SPEED TRAIN INITIATIVE. I AM AN 

ATTORNEY BUT LICENSED IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. IF THERE IS ANYTHING THAT I CAN DO TO ASSIST PUSHING THROUGH THIS INITIATIVE, PLEASE 

CONTACT ME.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Long over do!!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the train would increase potential revenue in Charlotte and would be worth while for fast futuristic travel around the country. This is a great 

first step of many of making Charlotte a bigger city. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity and should be acted upon in a quick matter. If we don't 

do it now then we will fall behind and out of the loop while other cities pass us by.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

It is time to make access to Southern cities with quick, convenient transportation.This is worth a high level of consideration and will be invaluable as 

North Carolinas grows.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I’m in favor of the new corridor! Driving to Atlanta takes longer and longer each time I go. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I think it is a great idea and a step towards the right direction. The Charlotte to Atlanta by high speed train will fuel economic growth between the 

two cities as well as making us more environmentally friendly.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I say it is time the US will put money in this fundamental infrastructure. This will be good for the labor force involved, the environment (cutting 

down on short polluting flights) and the economy. It cannot come soon enough!!!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Very interested in high speed rail to Atl with new rails taking 2 hours. I travel least 2-3 month to Atl and would definitely use it. Hace traveled China 

used their high speed rail its about time. Would use it more to travel there just to fly out of Atl for trips( CLT is too expensive to fly in/out of) as well.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Excellent idea! Terrific idea for Atlanta & ALL the cities influenced by a high speed rail. The best method of travel and far surpasses the benefits of 

our aging highway system. Anyone who commutes using I85 will enthusiastically support high speed rail!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

High speed trail is long overdue. Would love to see Ga DOT focus on getting some lines in place inside our state to reduce interstate traffic in and 

out of Atlanta before embarking on connecting to other states.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Tracks built primarily for interstate high-speed 

travel often serve a dual purpose, being used for shorter distance service, such as commuter rail, as well.
10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe linking the two cities by high speed rail will benefit both cities. A reduction in air traffic and the ability to commute between cities. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

This is going to be great for both economies and lead to a lot of growth in both cities. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

2 hours train ride from Charlotte to Atlanta would be awesome. I just love the idea. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I make the round trip often from Charlotte to Atlanta as my company has four offices there and think it would provide a substantial boost to the 

Charlotte economy to have a high speed solution other than air travel for that corridor.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I travel from Charlotte to Atlanta multiple times per month. This would same a lot of time and well worth the cost of riding. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

My family travels from Charlotte to Atlanta about 4-6 times a year, we would ditch the car every time if the trip was only 2 hrs. With little kids that's 

huge.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Improved and expanded rail connections to and from Atlanta are a great idea. It's a win/win situation - environmentally, ease of safe travel and 

forward looking

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I would absolutely support a train from Atlanta to Charlotte. Currently the drive between cities is too long for a day trip, too short for a flight. I 

would travel to Atlanta frequently for personal & business trips if this train were available and would happily support increasing tax dollars to fund 

the project.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to vote in favor of the effort to construct public transit from Atlanta to DC. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

High speed train from Atlanta to Charlotte- absolutely yes!!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Best thing ever! Yes, do it, for a modern, sustainable future! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

The ATL>CLT transit corridor must be improved to include mass transit ASAP before it’s too late. This is vital to the health of our region. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

PLEASE build a high speed light rail b/w Atlanta and Charlotte!!! The drive time is insane - traffic is heavy and roads are clogged! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I think a high speed rail corridor between Atlanta and Charlotte is a great idea. Having driven from Charlotte to Atlanta many times for meetings and 

to visit family, I would have loved an alternative to driving in the traffic on I-85.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Excellent initiative Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I’m entering my support for a high speed rail line from DC to Atlanta. This is long overdue from a standpoint of lessening auto emissions and ease of 

commuting around the nation in general.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I would be in favor of a high speed train between Atlanta and Charlotte. Traffic is just getting worse by the day. Something needs to be done. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the high speed rail corridor between Atlanta and Charlotte with the most desirable route being a new route that would provide the 

shortest and fastest times between the two cities.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I think we should go with the plan I would love to go to Greenville Sc in 30 min and definitely Columbia and Atlanta in 2hrs that will be great Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to voice my supposed for the proposed rail line between Atlanta and Charlotte. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Just read about the possibility of high speed rail in the Greensboro newspaper. I frequently make the drive to Atlanta, and having the ability to take 

a train from CLT to ATL would provide not only a faster way to get there, it would also be safer. The drive down I-85 can be a nightmare.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Though I didn’t review the exact materials, I did read an online article. I think this is a great idea. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I think building an additional corridor for the proposed Charlotte/ Atlanta rail line is smart, necessary and is great for much needed job creation in 

Charlotte. I vote yes.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe this is a great idea for people who live near either Greenville, South Carolina and Charlotte, North Carolina. Also great idea for people who 

may have relatives in I-85 interstate corridor from Atlanta to Charlotte.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I love the idea of a 2 hour trip to Atlanta. A 10 year time of construction seems daunting, but I think the outcome is wonderful. It would bring so 

much to Charlotte. As a GA native, I'm excited about the idea. Now, if prices could be made affordable, that will be the breaking point.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Our entire country is behind the rest of the industrialized countries in transportation. This is a necessity. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Please, do this. We need a high speed rail in the South East between these major metropolitan areas. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I support this. As a Charlotte resident, I think it’s time we join the major cities in the north and start working on connection not only in the city, but 

between large cities like Atlanta and Charlotte

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I'm extremely excited for the possibility of high speed rail coming to Atlanta. This option has been a long time coming and I want to voice my 

support for this project.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I support use of public funds for expansion of rail service and especially high speed rail from Raleigh to Greensboro to Charlotte to Atlanta. Please 

start on this project! I frequently travel to Atlanta and would love a viable high speed rail option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a 

national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors. An FEIS/ROD for the Atlanta-Chattanooga corridor was issued in 2017. 

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes! Love this! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love to see this become a reality. Our three children and eight grandchildren live in Marietta Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am COMPLETELY in favor of a high-speed rail connecting Atlanta and Charlotte. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes to more public transportation. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

This has been a long time coming. There should have been commuter rail between Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina for a long time! 

Logically this needs to happen due to the multitude of anthropogenic and environmental factors that are currently extant. Had planners and those 

with the money had the wisdom to do this decades ago some of the damage to our environment, infrastructure and human existence itself might 

have been drastically reduced or even non-existent.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

The high speed rail option from Atlanta to Charlotte, as part of the greater corridor, is exactly what is needed to bring the Southeast into the 21st 

century. Economies in each city would benefit greatly and mass transit helps provide a greener transportation option. Please, please, please make 

this happen. As a Charlotte native, Georgia MBA grad, and Atlanta professional I am very familiar with I85 and it’s honestly a mess. Do the right 

thing. Don’t be a fool!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am thrilled with the plan and hope that Georgia will show ourselves to be forward-thinking and adopt this plan. I would love to attend a meeting if 

possible.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this is an excellent project to put money towards and I would definitely utilize it! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

This is an absolutely amazing idea and would bring so many new faces and opportunities to Charlotte. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

A high speed rail line is just just what the southeast needs. I know for a fact that I would take many trips to Atlanta and beyond if this project is built! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Please make high speed rails the future don’t invest in cheeped options just because they are cheaper. Connect the most people possibly and make 

transportation accessible for all

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I support a high speed rail. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this is a great idea. It will reduce traffic with is good for the environment. We are so behind Europe when it comes to high speed rail. It’s good 

economically, more jobs

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I love the idea of high speed rail project between Atlanta and Charlotte. I think this will provide a valuable economic development while 

simultaneously reducing the strain on air travel and congested interstate system. I think incorporating Gainesville or Athens would have a positive 

impact for general populations and business travel.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

In favor. This projects creates less traffic on 85 and ensures less car accidents, faster travel, and convenience. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I FULLY support this plan, and believe it would be highly utilized by millions of people. The United States needs travel options like this to catch up 

with the rest of the world.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

A high speed rail corridor between Atlanta and Charlotte would be incredibly valuable. It would greatly improve my ability to do business. I’m 

familiar with the high speed rail system in Europe and long for the same environmentally friendly and efficient alternative that I could use regularly. 

Please, please, please fund this project!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I support this initiative and all options. It will have a tremendous economic impact for Gaston county and our region. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes for the high speed rail project between Atlanta and Charlotte Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Faster is better. Don’t be shortsighted due to cost. I will absolutely use this (already use Amtrak to Raleigh for visits with family, but for little else 

due to slow travel times).

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I want better train options! I am highly supportive of all train transport options. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a good idea for employment, culture and environmental reasons. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I support this. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Why hesitate to help the environment on which our FUTURE children and country depend? High speed rail and more Public Transportation is 

needed now.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

The proposed railway from Atlanta to DC is an absolutely wonderful idea. I often think about the amount of pollution that could be spared by such a 

move, as well as the time and money that travellers could save. Having lived in Europe and been able to travel anywhere on bus or train, I think this 

is a great idea. I urge you to go through with it, this is the direction our country needs to move in to reduce climate change.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a 

national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors.An FEIS/ROD for the Atlanta-Chattanooga corridor was issued in 2017. 

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Building this high speed rail is the type of thing that would make me move to either city. This will draw hundreds of thousands of people who are 

mobility as the driving force of the future

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Thank you for considering expanded rail options. Our roads are too congested. Rail will take so many cars off the roads. I look forward to using more 

public transportation in the future. Thanks!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the high speed CLT to ATL rail is the best option. I would use it at least once every 2 weeks. Many people would use it weekly for business, 

leisure, etc. I drive to and from Atlanta all the time and the amount of traffic I see between these two major cities is incredible. People will most 

definitely prefer sitting in a train instead of driving. Less time, no traffic, no need to focus on the roads, etc. I believe the third option is a great 

investment and move into the future. They say Charlotte is the fastest growing city— let’s prove it!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

It seems to be a great idea. Id feel comfortable abput fulfilling my 13yr dream of moving to Charlotte without worry of my parents being able to visit 

if couldnt drive (and they wouldnt have to). Projected crime increase or reductionand how I could be part of this awesome inclusion/liaison at my 

job (Dept.of Labor) has my mind flowing.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the high speed rail plan. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like the option to travel quickly as my brother is in Charlotte and I work in atlanta Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

The railways would be a huge game changer. Georgia doesn’t utilize existing right of ways and this would be a low impact but very high yield project 

for both citizens and govt.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Please consider the high speed rail alternatives, to move us forward as other countries have done. This will have a positive affect on our 

environmental concerns as well.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

This is an amazing idea that deserves full support. Rapid rail can change the face of the South and reduce reliance on cars/planes. I wanted to share 

my strong support for this initiative. I’m not able to attend the upcoming meeting so wanted to send this survey.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as someone unable to attend be public meeting. I am overwhelmingly in support of the high-speed rail corridor, as well as in increasing 

public transit in general. This is crucial in ensuring a greener future and in helping change the atomized transit culture of the Southeast.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Please help get rail roads working between Charlotte and atlanta Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I'm very excited about the prospect of high speed rail to Atlanta. We should go with the option that will have the highest ridership. No sense 

building a slow rail that few people will use.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the Atlanta to Charlotte railway is a great idea! It will make traveling back and forth more convenient. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Fully support rail corridor between Atlanta and Charlotte. Superb idea and hope is accomplished as soon as possible. If could link the RTP triangle 

area as well would be wonderful.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

we need better public transportation. So I agree with this proposal Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Please make this happen. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing in full support of this project. Please follow through with enacting it! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I’m very excited by the prospect of passenger rail in the region. It is long overdue and greatly needed Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love for this light rail to be built. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

A Charlotte to Atlanta fast rail system makes infinite sence. The linking of Two major urban powerhouse southeast cities by high speed rail would 

excelerate economic growth.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

This rain line to Charlotte is awesome! I fully support it, great job! Please implement it Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Getting to Atlanta in 2 hours would be great and would allow for tremendous economic benefit. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

We have I-85, so it seems redundant to copy that path. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the high speed train. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the idea of building the route. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

As someone who just moved to Charlotte after living in Atlanta for 30 years, I would LOVE a faster way to go back, that doesn't involve getting on a 

plane (bc let's face it, it probably takes just as long to fly due to security and whatnot).

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Great idea extending to me from Atlanta to CharlotteNC Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes to high speed rail to Charlotte! I make that drive frequently and would take a high-speed train if it was on time and less than 3 hours. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

This is long awaited. As a travelling consultant, the Charlotte to Atlanta transportation options have often been called the "too long to drive, too 

short to fly route."

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I’d love a rail from Charlotte to Atlanta! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

For high speed rail to Atlanta Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I support high speed rail from Atlanta to Charlotte. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

The traffic on I-85 is getting worse and this extends all through Ga, SC and NC. Putting in a high speed train could alleviate some of the traffic 

problems now seen. GA had the opportunity to extend train service towards the Athens area when the Olympics were held in Atlanta and it never 

happened. Don’t drop the ball again!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I’m a big supporter of the rail. I use Charlotte to Raleigh all the time Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Hello, I work in Charlotte and live in Indian Land, SC (just outside Charlotte) and wanted to write in support of the proposed high speed rail line (the 

one with the 2 hour travel time) between Charlotte and Atlanta. It is definitely something I can see myself using, and would be a great investment in 

our communities. Thank you for your consideration.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I cannot make the meeting but wish to voice my support as an Athens resident Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I love this idea! Make it happen! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

We want high speed rail Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

This would be great for those who travel frequently! Traffic is getting out of hand. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

My wife and I are very supportive of a high speed train from Charlotte to Atlanta. After living the large majority of our lives in Georgia, we moved 

from Atlanta to Charlotte three years ago, leaving many family and friends behind. We still visit Georgia 3-6 times a year and would much prefer to 

take a high speed rail over driving. Thank you for taking the time to review my input on the matter.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

ABSOLUTELY YES!!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to see a train from Atl to Charlotte!! This could be beneficial in so many ways for so many people♡ Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Please approve the high speed train from Charlotte to Atlanta. Cutting the time to Atlanta in half and reducing motor vehicle traffic would be 

amazing.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

This would be AMAZING! Would create less traffic on the roads. Provide a safe alternative mode of transportation. Along with a fun & unique 

experience on travel!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the high speed rail project. The long term benefits will make it very worthwhile. Traffic between Athens and Atlanta is bad and this would 

lighten traffic and provide a traffic free alternative of travel.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the high speed rail project! We need to work on flying alternatives to stop the destruction of the planet; Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

This would really be great for both cities with Charlotte continuing to grow it’s like Atlanta little brother this will bring a lot more revenue to both 

cities.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love alternatives to driving Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Even an Athens Atlanta line would be huge! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I wish they could have much better access to get around by train. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Please get better public transportation between Charlotte and ATL! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am absolutely in favor of high speed rail linking Charlotte and Atlanta. It's about time the Southeast received its due in public transportation of this 

kind.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

A wonderful opportunity for Charlotte and the region. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would really use an Altanta-Charlotte corridor. Please bring one to our area!!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am an Athens resident and wholeheartedly support the plan and believe it would be monumental. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this one of the Big things our country need. I think we need high speed train all over the country. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I’m so excited, and in favor of, a high-speed rail system Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Better public transport please Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love to see this built! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

In favor of Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am very much in favor of the high-speed ATL > CLT lightrail! I think this would be an affordable, environmentally savvy, and highly used mode of 

transit.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. This Project would be an intercity rail project. 

Light rail refers to urban rapid transit systems.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Highly in support of this option. Thank you for allowing me to voice my support. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I cannot attend the meeting but I would like to express support of the high speed rail between Atlanta and Charlotte. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Please do whatever it takes to make this happen sooner rather than later. I am from Kannapolis, NC and have lived in Atlanta since 1999. I use to 

drive back home about every other mother. But the drive has become taxing and extremely long. Also with 3 kids that drive can be unbearable. The 

traffic and construction all the way up and down 85 is ridiculous. My mother and sister who are still in the Kannapolis don’t travel down here as 

much for the same. Please, please construct this corridor to keep families together.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Choosing any of the corridors that doesn't allow the **fastest** possible route between Charlotte and Atlanta is a waste of time and resources. A 4-

hour train ride isn't worth spending the resources. A 2-hour trip could dramatically change the region. People in Charlotte or Atlanta could get to the 

other town for an event after work, which would dramatically change the region. If the train ride took over 2 hours, it doesn't become much more 

competitive than a bus trip or the existing Amtrak option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes we need this. Please build this. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Bring the Charlotte Atlanta Corridor to Atlanta ASAP! It would be a great for Atlanta business. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am so excited and looking forward. I think this is a great idea that will reduce emissions and traffic. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I think that if funding is acquired, this would be a great thing for all 3 states Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

In favor or rapid transit from Atlanta to Charlotte. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Let’s build more train and rail to boost the economy and connect our cities! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/17/2019 Web 

Comment

I'm a fan of the proposed rail project. Connecting 2 major cities in the southeast while reducing vehicle traffic. It also looks like some of the 

proposed stops could be used as a commuter rail to reduce travel times to either city and offer residents of more rural areas access to higher paying 

jobs thus boosting the economy of the region while allowing a reduction in population growth of over populated metro areas.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/17/2019 Web 

Comment

I am all for it. I believe that commuter rail is something that is not looked into enough for Atlanta. In the same way, I believe intercity rail could also 

be a great addition to Atlanta, Charlotte, and the Southeast. I would use the train for both business and leisure.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Tracks built primarily for interstate high-speed 

travel are often used for shorter distance service, such as commuter rail, as well.

10/17/2019 Web 

Comment

This would be a great and lucrative idea. I love it! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/17/2019 Web 

Comment

This would be wonderful . We have family in greenville and this would be great to use! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/14/2019 Web 

Comment

This would be a great project which would connect a fast growing corridor - I could not think of a better use for GDOT's dollars. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/12/2019 Web 

Comment

Excellent concept and idea, With large extended family in Charlotte and many activities to attend in Atlanta, would love to see this rail line come to 

reality.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/11/2019 Web 

Comment

I feel like this train will help this region and provide important economic infrastructure! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/10/2019 Web 

Comment

I am strongly in favor of mass transit options and excited about the prospect of traveling from my home in Athens within the state of Georgia to 

Atlanta as well as out of state to North Carolina without driving my personal vehicle.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/7/2019 Web 

Comment

I think it is important to connect the three major airports, Atlanta, Spartanburg, and Charlotte. Putting it along I85 might relieve traffic congestion 

on the road. Since I am near Athens, I would like it to come there, but any of the routes is preferable to no train.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

9/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Hello, I am a former 13-year Atlanta-area resident and I spent the greater part of my life along the corridor, having grown up in the Charlotte area, attended school at Clemson University, and having spent 

most of my adult professional life in Atlanta architecture firms before moving my family to France almost exactly a decade ago. I now live and work in Paris, with the architecture and planning affiliate of 

French National Railways SNCF. I work daily in the high-speed rail environment and I have traveled tens of thousands of miles by TGV. My passion for HSR and the TGV, and my personal vision for highspeed rail along the Piedmont-Atlantic Corridor led me to move to France in order to study how they did it over there. I have been working on a proposal of some sort for this line for the last several 

years. I do not know what form (white paper, book, PowerPoint presentation, etc.) that this work will ultimately result in nor to whom I will address it but for now, my work currently exists as a growing 

compilation of research and alignment segments laid-out on Google Earth (TM). I am afraid that none of the three options follow the best approach to my opinion. At each end of your proposed line, there 

is a formidable enemy that will consecrate enormous resources into seeing that this project fails. Delta Airlines, on the Atlanta end, and American Airlines, in Charlotte. The two of them flew nearly 

700,000 passengers between Atlanta – Hartsfield-Jackson Int’l Airport, Greenville-Spartanburg Airport, and Charlotte Douglas Int’l Airport, in 2018, according to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics. 

Developing this line as is currently implied would be in direct competition with their revenue stream. They have observed how the development of HSR in Europe has decimated competing air routes, and 

therefore, would leave the airlines no logical choice but to devote all legal and influence resources at their disposal to ensure that the HSR project never gains steam. So, give the airlines a role (a stake in 

the game): - Make it a first priority to meaningfully connect the airports, to offer effective air-to-rail intermobility. Evaluate options to enable station platforms to have landside and airside flexibility. - 

Open the system to multiple HS train operators. Make the case to the airlines that they can be transportation providers and not simply air-service providers. Allow airlines to flag and operate high-speed 

rail trainsets and enable them to incorporate HSR routes into their normal timetables. - Encourage them to replace a number of their daily flights with time slots on the rails. Set minimum standards for 

passenger comfort aboard rolling stock that is permitted to operate on the line, as well as minimum square footage per passenger, and minimum accessibility standards beyond those prescribed by the 

ADA. Additionally, connect the Universities. Worldwide, students and faculty members make up a principal catchment of steady ridership in passenger rail systems. Many studies, such as one carried-out

recently by USPIRG indicate that younger generations are becoming less and less enamored with automobile ownership or with even obtaining their driver’s license. Craft the corridor alignment and the 

placement of stations accordingly. The Overland alignment is shown serving Athens and UGA, but it passes well south of the city of Anderson, SC and far too distant from Clemson University for Clemson 

students to reasonably benefit from it. Finally, look closely at alternative infrastructure financing and development scenarios. Build a team. Even “Socialist” France has turned to PPP to develop the HSR 

infrastructure. Obviously, this requires intelligent, comprehensive, and responsible public oversight. But PPP is a project enabler. The latest opening LGV (French high-speed line) to open in France, the 210-

mile South-Europe-Atlantic high-speed Line (LGV-SEA) opened in 2017 and was developed a mostly financed by a four-member consortium of an infrastructure development company and large 

investment, and asset-management firms who financed a majority share of the development cost in return for drawing a 44-year contract for the line’s revenue. Thank you,

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

GDOT recognizes that airlines have, generally, stopped opposition to high-speed regional rail projects. Apparently, they have determined that the relatively 

short distance flights are not very profitable and that it makes more sense to save the finite number of take-off/landing slots for longer distance flights. 

Integrating train stations directly into the air terminals so that trains can be effective feeders for long-distance flights, as is typical in worldwide best-practice, 

will be fully analyzed in upcoming phases of Project development.The full range of options for financing construction of high-speed rail will also be considered.

Web 

Comment

I just wanted to voice my support for the proposal that routes through Greenville SC. As a frequent traveler to both Atlanta and Charlotte, this area 

has long needed alternative transportation to these hubs.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
Written 

Comment

Please build transit.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

We need frequent trail service in USA. If for no other reason we need good service for security reasons. As we found out in 911, the on time air 

system can be stopped - not true for trains. Train travel is humane and delivers to city centers. Thank you for doing this. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

I would love to see new highspeed rail roughly parralleling the CSX corridor along the route of the silver comet. I watched the last silver comet pull 

through emory station over 50 years ago. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Fastest route possible between locations is incredibly important. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

This is a very exciting project and something we should push to accomplish as soon as possible. Please find a way to broadcast this message as much 

as possible. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

I think the corridor that reduces travel time should be preferred. Otherwise, who will ride?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Great project for the southeast part of the country. Keep doing a great job. I hope it gets funded all the way to the end. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Very interested in seeing the project through. It's time for this type of train option to be available for all commuters in this part of the country. Will 

open up the southeast as these states combine to grow. Pull for funding. It is a critical project and a worthwhile investment for the public. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Project is much needed. Use the existing Crescent Amtrack numerous times per year. Would use new trains on a much more regular basis if a train 

was available during daytime hours.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
Written 

Comment

I like a train from Charlotte to Atlanta. If that is the main idea, please focus on that. Try to make it between 90 minutes to 120 minutes. Just a few 

stops. Uptown to uptown. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Very interested in having this transportation option in our area. We need something like this. There is a cultural battle to overcome. Since people 

aren't use to these options in the area. However, there is a large group of supporters. Looking forward to hearing more. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

This is sorely needed. Traveling from Greenville to Charlotte on I-85 has been horrible. I am aware of rail passenger efforts in North Carolina and 

Virginia that have established or planned modern rail transportation. It is needed in GA and SC to complete a vital route. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

After reading the info provided I am favoring the continuation of the project. My biggest concern is the train travel speed. I would probably continue 

to drive if conventional diesel is used. Speed and convenience should be paramount. Enough with the "environmental justice" nonsense too. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

I am very happy to connect with everyone this evening. I am looking forward to being very active in helping bring this awesome progress to 

Greenville. Thank you for all your friendly information. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

I'm very excited about the possibility of this project. I really hope it happens not only as a transportation/train enthusist but also as a commuter for 

work. I work in hotels and often travel from Atlanta to Greenville to Charlotte monthly. This would greatly improve my business travel. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

I want to say that I think this is an amazing idea. This could real change the game for me in terms of expanding my reach professionally. There are so 

many more opportunities in Atlanta and Charlotte. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Very excited about the recruiting benefits, expanding economic mobility, regional transportation

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

This is what tax money is meant for. Awesome stuff, build it. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
Written 

Comment

Thanks for the preparation. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

This project is a dream come true. Having a mass transit opportunity linking Atlanta - Upstate - Charlotte would open up these communities to 

economic and cultural growth. Personally, being able to profit from professional and collegiate sports without a POV and the drive would be 

outstanding. Having lived in Europe and benefitting from available, reliable, economically accessible mass transit showed me if was possible. This 

would lessen the wear and tear on our aging 85 infrastucture and improve safety. The benefits of this project are clear to me, and I hope I am alive 

to ride. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

This was a well-organized event that is highlighted the significant neds in the area of improving our current transportation infrastructure. We need 

more forums like this and we need to include more stakeholders who will ultimately help advocate for this issue. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Court Reporter

I am pro for this idea, because in the long-term from our descendants, we need to give them mobility, freedom from Atlanta to LA. They can enjoy 

the ride to Atlanta and late dinner in Los Angeles. Also enjoying breakfast in Atlanta and late lunch to New York. It means not only the economy but 

also political and admittedly -- military purpose. China already completed their high speed rail from Beijing to Shanghai. To extend the other areas 

with high speed, that is a great infrastructure. So in the United States, we are just bounded by states. There are many people who are not 

experienced to go to the neighboring states. I hope the government will make it as a national project; not only rely on the state, but nationwide.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Court Reporter

I think it is a really good thing and definitely GDOT needs to give the project full funding. Considering that they have already spent well in excess of a 

billion dollars on railway interchange projects, that will be maxed out within ten years. I think this is a great opportunity to solve a lot of 

transportation and congestion problems throughout the Southeast. It is always going to be more expensive in the future. They definitely need to get 

on it now rather than later.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Court Reporter

And my concern is corridor alternatives. And really, an elevated solution like skyTran, S-K-Y-T-R-A-N, as a solution to larger, heavier locomotives. I 

talked to some people this week in California who are working with skyTran. They are the CEO and COO, I guess, of the company. And they have a 

test site in Israel and a test site in Texas and a site in California that they are working with. Now, they have don't have an operational site yet, but 

they are hoping the one in Texas is going to be operational soon. And they believe that in a year or two they are going to -- I'm going to say '23 they 

can have a -- they can be ready to build a ·corridor, a track where the vehicles would be 100 miles an hour or more. Okay? So I know that's not quite 

as fast as some of these solutions, but they probably could accelerate above that if that was a requirement. But the point is, in addition to looking at 

the cost of rail corridors, we need to look at what I'm going to call ultralight rail, personal rapid-transit or group rapid-transit vehicles.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
Court Reporter

I am a lawyer by training. I haven't been a courtroom in years. I am basically -- I guess you could say semi-retired now. I have been interested in rail 

travel ever since I was a child. When I was in law school, I used to get a train from Greenville to Charleston. You can't do that anymore. My 

hometown is Charleston. I live here, in Greenville. I have two granddaughters, two and six, in Atlanta. I hate getting on 85 anymore. I used to go up 

and down that road all the time to visit my wife's family in Tennessee. I don't like getting on 85 at all. The traffic is horrendous. The traffic is -- the 

roads are -- the interstate is not built for the traffic we have. They are not capable of handling the traffic we have now. They were great when they 

were young, but our railroad system in this country is like worse than a third-world country. I have been to Ireland, been to Scotland. Ireland's rail 

system is wonderful. Ours is horrible. A little ole country like Ireland, I think has about the population of South Carolina, has got such a much better 

public transportation system. It's absolutely ridiculous. We need this and we need it now, not when I'm 100, but I will take it whenever for my 

grandchildren and great-grandchildren. I think that's all I want to say.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Court Reporter

I want this to happen. I'm a retired school teacher, tight budget, but I'm willing to pay extra taxes for 21st-century transportation. Driving on the 

interstates is dangerous now for a senior citizen or for new drivers, and I would like to have access to reliable trains, rails, especially high-speed. 

Let's see. What else do I need to say? I just said about the 21st century. I think the impact on the environment would be less than automobiles. It 

would promote a better quality of life. Families like mine separated by distance, we have relatives in Atlanta and in Tennessee, we could visit more 

frequently, easily. Please make this happen soon. Okay. Thank you.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Court Reporter

I am, uh, a former resident of Atlanta for thirteen years. I grew up along the corrid -- uh, the Charlotte to Atlantic corridor. I was, uh -- I grew up in -- 

outside of Charlotte. I went to Clemson University, and I was in Atlanta for, uh, thirteen years professionally until, uh, about a decade ago when I 

moved to France. And, uh, so I would say since -- since I've been working for the, uh -- uh, station design affiliate for a French rail -- railway, SNCF. I -- 

this is --this project or the potential for this project has been a passion of mine since, uh, I first learned of the -- of a TGV. Um, and I think this is a, uh 

-- I have over-- well, somewhere around, uh, a hundred thousand miles logged in TGVs in Eu -- in France, and it's just an incredible way of travel. It's 

a transformative way of travel. People, um -- it is completely transformative -- the French culture, it -- with respect to how they get around, why 

they get around, what -- what they do and for --and what motivates them. Uh, it base -- it essentially changes the map. It -- it -- it stretches -- it -- it 

pulls-- it pulls cities much closer together. Cities which are once, uh, occasional vacation spots are now commuting locations. Um, so I -- the 

insistence, uh, this is something that we have to do in the US. We should already have been doing-- we should've -- have invented it. And, uh, I really 

hope to see this happening along the, uh, Charlotte, Atlanta corridor. Thank you.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Court Reporter

I represent myself. Um, this proposal actually hits every target of where I have to travel often. So it would be really helpful if we could get this done. 

My son is in Maryland at a private school, I am here working, and I'm traveling back to visit family in Georgia. So if I can get off the highway, save the 

money, keep that in my pocket in order to pay for his tuition, I will be extremely grateful. That's it.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
Court Reporter

Um, I'm live here in Charlotte for seven years now, and I always love Atlanta, and I want to travel there a lot, uh, for games, and, uh, I live in Europe 

for two years. So is -- it was very easy just moving by trains. So for me, I love this idea. I want to support it, and I will be traveling. I'm just waiting for 

the day that it's done. Yeah. Thank you.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I think that this is a fantastic idea bringing two large metropolitan areas, Charlotte and Atlanta, together. As a resident of Greenville, I could see 

myself using this for work purposes, but still residing in South Carolina. I think this would benefit South Carolina tremendously especially with the 

mess of 85. My suggestion would be to include Gaffney as a stop.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

1) I don't see how any alternative that uses the existing NW tracks can be considered. Those lines are already congested with freight traffic, to the 

extent that existing passenger rail (Amtrak) regularly runs hours late. Adding high speed rail to that already awful corridor is a waste of effort. High 

speed rail in this corridor must have its own tracks. 2) If rail can be faster than driving (i.e. 3 hours) then this is a viable idea. If rail is slower, it isn't 

worth looking at. 3) Tucker, and Lawrenceville are silly places to have stations. Go up the 985 corridor, have a station at Gainesville, and then 

north from there.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

ALTERNATIVE 6: CSX AND NS VIA ATHENS (CSX ATHENS) As an Athens native and resident, I can say that train service has been needed for years. 

There are not enough jobs in Athens that pay enough for professionals so we must go to Atlanta. However the commute times and parkinf in Atlanta 

make that impossible. The commute to my job in Fulton County was over two hours each way. Train service would make the commute time easier 

and more productive. It would keep traffic down and reduce individual consumption of fossil fuels.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Court Reporter

I want to talk about the total project, really. I became aware, on a recent visit to Atlanta, that we are not going to be able to construct enough lanes 

to take care of all the traffic that needs to be taken care of, so rail traffic is another means for people to be transported. I have read the study. I 

think it's a very good study. It's obvious that the Crescent route is not the optimum route, even though it's the cheapest. But I do believe that the 

Greenfield does not take care of the population that it should take care of; therefore, I'm for the I-85 corridor. It's where the population resides. I 

believe it will take traffic off of I-85. I think it's the best option for us. I obviously would also like, because I'm from Kings Mountain, North Carolina, 

to be able to have a Park and Ride from the west of Charlotte to be able to go to Atlanta. So I would like to have a station placed in Kings Mountain 

as well as Gastonia, then they have the one at the Charlotte Douglas Airport and then the Gateway. Let me think if there is anything else. So I 

believe that there could be a smorgasbord corridor made up at Greenfield when it makes sense for a right-of-way and I-85, because of picking up 

the population, to lessen the cost of the I-85 corridor because it's 15, 16 billion dollars and the other is 6 to 7 billion. I think that's about all I want to 

say. The time for passenger rail is now. So it might be that we start a service on the Norfolk Southern route first, just to get it started; to get people 

used to being on rail. Even though it takes longer, it's much more convenient and much more relaxing than being on 85, and I think it would relieve 

the 85 congestion. Somehow we have got to convince Norfolk Southern that it can be a money-making venture for them. They have been unwilling 

to talk about passenger rail, yet their tonnage for coal freight has been going down. Why can't we put passenger rail on to make up the difference of 

the losses from coal freight?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
Court Reporter

I have been around this stuff for almost 30 years, first as a member of the Atlanta City Council and then as the rail program manager of the Georgia 

Rail Passenger Authority. We have studied this and studied that and studied the other thing and done environmental studies, and we have gotten 

nowhere. I am hopeful that this may lead to something positive. But I also think that we need to walk before we run, and we need to get passenger 

rail established on existing corridors. I realize that that is maybe negative thinking, may not be forward thinking enough, but we have the 

infrastructure. We can improve the infrastructure that we have for nowhere near as much as we are talking about in order to provide people with 

alternative forms of transportation. I hope that I live to see this, but I am not optimistic about that. That's all.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Court Reporter

I'm the planning and economic development director. Had four comments primarily. One was, uh, would ask if you all would consider a hybrid 

approach when you consider the Phase II, Tier II process. In other words, right now you're looking at each one of those corridors as a independent, 

uh, between Charlotte and Atlanta, and I would hope that you might consider, um, mixing and matching, so to speak. And the reason for that is, uh, 

we believe that in City Kings Mountain, that we're a park and ride for the western part of North Carolina. And that as such, you know, a park and 

ride in that location and access to the station along I-85 Corridor will make a lot of sense. We do like the idea of the, uh, greenfill approach and the 

faster process that would allow with a greenfill. But also looking at what's going on in Gaston County and Gastonia, that it's probably very 

problematic to try to do the greenfill in that part of the country. So we would recommend that. Also, um, coming from a different part of the 

country, I came from Chicagoland area. I remember driving in on the interstate, and I remember going like two to five miles an hour. And, uh, I 

would look off to the left or right depending on -- well, actually it would be the left each way. Either going east or west, and I'm going two to five 

miles an hour or stopped, and I would see the, uh, commuter trail just flying by. And I think that, uh, while I-85 would allow that kind of approach to 

allow people to see a train going by pretty fast and allow people to think -- have a more top of mind approach to want to utilize rail as opposed to, 

um, just getting in their car. We have -- it doesn't matter how many lanes you put in, you know, eventually those lanes are gonna get clogged up 

and that's the advantage of, uh, the rail access, and we'd ask you consider those options. And thank you for your time.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

I am the city planner for the city of Spartanburg. We would be supportive of a stop/station in Spartanburg County or Spartanburg City, and are 

supportive of the project overall. During our Comp Planning Process we will conduct exercises considering the Downtown (Norfolk-Southern) and 

585/Milliken stop. Personally I would be thrilled for this to happen, even without a stop in Spartanburg - it would be amazing for the development 

and economic opportunity for the entire Piedmont-Atlantic. I would prefer a stop in the City, but I am most supportive of the I-85 option. The 

Greenfield option would not take the advantage of existing infrastructure/regional modes/transit connections. I would also want to see as least 

amount of added environmental impact as possible and would be appreciative of the possibility to alleviate traffic congestion along I-85. This project 

will change the upstate radically - regardless of how many stops are placed here. Transit Oriented Development for the win. I hope I see this come 

to fruition during my lifetime. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am fully in favor of the proposed Atlanta to Charlotte rail line. I would like to see the line connect Athens and then go northeast to the I-85 

corridor connecting with Clemson, Greenville, Spartanburg, and onward to Charlotte. I would hope North Carolina would possibly connect Raleigh 

and Wilmington. The route I propose is not one of the three proposed, but a blend of two of the three.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
Court Reporter

I will say that the route I like the most is the Green Line, with a little bit of the Red Line that they have incorporated into it. Like when it gets to 

around Greenville, South Carolina, I think that should be included too, if possible.· Another thing I want to bring up, I think this is really important. 

We should form a type of statewide express rail service that can take care of all the major cities like Augusta, Macon and Columbus.

I was working with the Gwinnett County Sierra Club, the Georgia chapter Sierra Club to get the vote out for the MARTA referendum. A lot of people 

were asking about, what about systems like transit X or the elevated pods on the rails that can go on the sides of streets. They don't take up much 

space, and they can go up and down. That sounds like a helpful thing, like cul-de-sac neighborhoods because there is a problem with accessibility for 

people getting around in cul-de-sac type subdivisions. It makes transportation difficult. That's about it.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Yeah please do that. It will be great of this High Speed Rail from Atlanta through Charlotte & Do Need stops in Greenville & Greer, SC areas too 

please. Thankyou.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I wanted to voice my support of a stop in Anderson, SC, and of the project in general. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Support 100% a route that comes to Suwanee, GA! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenville-Spartanburg International Airport (GSP) must be included in the proposed Atlanta-Charlotte high-speed rail line plans. To exclude 

GSP as an air-rail transportation hub would be a mistake.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

The Gaston Regional Chamber supports the a high-speed rail line between Charlotte and Atlanta, particularly with a stop in Gastonia, North Carolina Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

If rail travel on the Southern Crescent corridor would take up to 5.5 hours to deliver passengers to Charlotte from Atlanta (and vice versa), then 

that's not high speed travel and we don't need it considering that route can be driven by automobile in under four hours. One of the other options 

delivering passengers in under three hours would be the better route, so to speak. Other comments- there really needs to be a MMPT in downtown 

Atlanta. It would be nice if the Greenfield route went closer to downtown Greenville but I understand I-85 is probably in the way.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I think having a high speed rail line from Atlanta to Charlotte is a great idea, and would be beneficial to the southeast as a whole. The greater benefit 

would be if the line were to connect with Washington DC and then New York via Amtrak. It offers a much more environmentally friendly and 

sustainable mode of transportation compared to air travel. Also, when factoring in travel time to the airport and security screening etc it would 

possibly be faster. As long as it's done correctly with a vision of speed and efficiency then I think it's a great idea!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. An important part of the Purpose for the 

Atlanta-Charlotte project is its role as a key part of the Southeast Corridor to Washington DC, conncting there to the Northeast Corridor. The optimum 

operating plan, including whether trips through to DC will require a change of trains, will be made in later stages of the Project Development process.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I support a rail line going from Atlanta through Greenville to Charlotte. I would prefer a route that minimizes negative environmental impact and 

either goes through Greenville or includes plans for a spoke that will go from the main rail line into downtown Greenville.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

I'm excited to hear more about this ambitious project and am generally an advocate of needed public transit in the area. I am curious what benefit 

the Crescent line has over the others as it will not (or is not expected to) cover the costs of construction. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Great idea. I would discourage the Greenfield Route. In favor of a stop in Greenville. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I do not support the Greenfield option. The options that would interface with the towns and also touch GSP would serve the public better. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

The passenger corridor for high speed connection is needed. I am concerned that the project to lack a strong advocate. Who is the advocate for this 

project?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to see an energy efficient form of fuel. We already have issues with air quality. I would suggest the rail to be electric and have some 

solar panels added to save on running cost. I personally like the existing railway route. Thanks for your time.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 
Court Reporter

As an individual who cares about leaving a small environmental imprint on our earth, I think something like this is really important in order to 

protect our environment; to also allow individuals who need transportation to get from one place to another who can't afford a vehicle or don't 

want the vehicle emissions to impact our environment, whether it be urban or suburbs. Make it more feasible for individuals who want to travel far 

distances but don't have the means to do it. Do it in an environmentally friendly way. As an educator, I think it is important that raising a generation 

of future individuals who are going to take care of our earth, it is up to us to set a good example to do things like this and push initiatives like this. If 

we don't take care of the earth, who will teach our kids to do it?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Environmental considerations will be fully 

considered in the Tier 2 study.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Having a high speed rail link between my home of Atlanta to Charlotte would be incredibly beneficial to our cities. These to cities already do an 

incredible amount of business and trade together, such a rail link would be huge for both of these economies. It would also drastically reduce the 

environmental impact of all of this Intercity commerce since high speed rail travel produces a fraction of the emissions of air travel. Lastly, 

connecting this with the North East corridor would provide an excellent, rapid, and sustainable transportation alternative across the entire Eastern 

seaboard. The economic opportunities of that are boundless.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. 

An important part of the Purpose for the Atlanta-Charlotte project is its role as a key part of the Southeast Corridor to Washington DC, conncting there to the 

Northeast Corridor. The optimum operating plan, including whether trips through to DC will require a change of trains, will be made in later stages of the 

Project Development process.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I am glad to see our region considering robust mass transit options and I hope the plan goes forward, both to alleviate congestion on the I-85 

corridor and to lower carbon emissions. It's good to see the existing rail lines being considered, though I know it might not be feasible to use them 

all. However it's done, I hope it's as environmentally responsible as possible within the financial limitations. It would be great to see our region step 

up as leaders of both public infrastructure and climate-consciousness.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Environmental considerations will be fully 

considered in the Tier 2 study.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Pending the outcome of suitability and environmental impact studies, I 100% support the construction and implementation of a high-speed rail line 

through the Atlanta-Charlotte corridor.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Environmental considerations will be fully 

considered in the Tier 2 study.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

High speed from Atlanta to outer cities and not just communities is important. Traffic build up is environmentally unfriendly AMD unfortunately we 

just don't have enough movement through such a large city outbound. Investment sites and employment opportunities would be easier to access 

and I'd love to be able to visit and travel by train for those friends and family I just can't muster the idea of driving 3,5, or 12 hours to. Environmental 

care is first and foremost, but if the train saves people from driving individual vehicles or taking buses, I would say give it a go.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Environmental considerations will be fully 

considered in the Tier 2 study.

Written 

Comment

Sounds like an incredible and needed project as the region continues to grow. Was particularly interested in the environmental impact and 

information on revenue/O&M for each line. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Environmental considerations will be fully 

considered in the Tier 2 study.
11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Follow-up comments as per the public information session held in Atlanta, October, 22. Overall I am in support of any rail project – regional commuter or 

interstate passenger line. The basic expectation would be to pursue this or any rail project holistically in the context of long-range transportation planning efforts, 

balancing the needs with local transit - coordinating with the ATL/ Atlanta-Region Transit Link Authority, to ensure the best as possible transportation solutions. 

Incorporating private rail services would be beneficial as existing rail, though asking Norfolk Southern or CSX to forgo access would require financial incentives. 

 Route preference would be to maximize the number of connections to reach employment and education centers, including Athens GA, Anderson SC (Clemson 

Univ.), and Greenville SC. As for the project approach, applying a phased or iterative effort, targeting a first phase of service within the Atlanta/North Georgia 

Region could serve as a proof of concept before an even larger investment to span greater distances. For locomotive power, diesel-electric would be an ideal mode 

with no need to commit to a dedicated infrastructure such as catenary power lines, which may not work well on existing commercial rail lines running cars with 

excessive dimensions. Improving Public Communications/Collateral As one example of improved communications, in referencing the Atlanta to Charlotte 

newsletter distributed at the open house, it would be helpful to minimize - if not eliminate, the use of acronyms and jargon in favor of more common language 

terms to better engage the general public that is often not familiar or cares to know the process of pursing transportation projects. Ex. National Environmental 

Policy Act (NEPA), becomes Environmental Policy or government regulations, and Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) could be Preliminary 

environmental review or environmental study. In general, for all public transportation initiatives, it is helpful to communicate the benefits – even potential, of 

pursuing a particular project – economic sustainability, time savings, reduced environmental impact, energy efficiency, etc. The steps to fulfill a project are not very 

meaningful if people cannot relate to the end product or service. One specific layout edit, on page 7 "Technology and Speed Option," the last sentence of the 

Electric summary states there is a table below outlining the speed options, instead there are two track images, the comparison is on the following page 8.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support this project without even settling on the route option. I'm simply excited that it's even being considered. Like one of the 

attendees opined, I am also disappointed the higher tech solution is not being considered. I do understand that may be due to cost, but we're 

projecting this as a possibility many years into the future, and by that time how relevant will the technology be? Japan, Europe, and especially China 

are light years ahead of us in this field. I know we can do better. Still, I'm excited to lend my voice in support of this study.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. It is anticipated that the project will be 

constructed to then-current world-class standards.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

A few comments: If funding has not been figured out on this project yet, I believe we could set this up as an Opportunity Fund Investment. This 

would be a fast way to raise funds and at a lower rate. I'm happy to help with that even if I'm not involved in the final fundraising efforts. 

Melliott@SCOpportuintyFund.com The Boring Company can build a tunnel for $10MM per mile, very fast. They just built a tunnel under the GW 

Parkway from DC to Baltimore. We could just put a tunnel under I-85 and not have to worry about easements, rail crossings etc... We could also 

have the tunnels go straight from ATL to GSP to CLT airports. This would in my mind significantly reduce the cost and complexity of the project and 

also the speed at which it is started.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. It is anticipated that the project will be 

constructed to then-current world-class standards.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

As someone who frequently travels from northern cities to Greenville, South Carolina, it is always distressing to see the number of people flying 

between Greenville and Atlanta and Greenville and Charlotte (myself included because GSP is just not big enough to demand flights to many cities). 

I think a high-speed train could have wonderful impacts on travel time and could seriously cut down on these short flights that negatively impact the 

environment. Aside from impacts on air travel, it always seems like a good idea to have fewer people driving on I-85.

Thank you for your support. The Department appreciates your time attending the open house and commenting on the proposed project. All comments 

received will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS/ROD). Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. Please see Exhibit 1-8 in Chapter 1 of the DEIS for a comparison of travel modes and 

average travel times for automobile vs. air travel, the table can also be seen below. Also, see Exhibit 2-20 in Chapter 2 of the DEIS for potential travel times for 

the three Corridor Alternatives. High-speed rail service would provide many direct benefits for travel along the corridor. A high-speed rail line would provide 

direct service multiple cities and stations, increasing connectivity and accessibility for communities along the corridor. High-speed rail service would also 

provide similar door-to-door travel times as air service between endpoints when taking into account travel time to the airport and to clear security protocol. 

By shifting travelers from air to rail, additional capacity will become available at the region’s congested airports to allow for longer distance flights. Rail service 

also produces less emission pollutants than air travel. A Tier 2 study will consider diesel vs electric train technology types, if electric technology is selected, 

the reduction in emissions would be even greater. Costs can vary by alternative and the Corridor Alternatives have had a limited amount of engineering 

performed to date. From Appendix B (Alternatives Development Report) section 5.9.2 Capital Cost Estimates, the per mile cost (2013 dollars) for the Southern 

Crescent Corridor Alternative 110MPH service is 271 miles in length with a cost per mile of $8.5M; for the I-85 Corridor Alternative (180MPH) length is 266 

miles with a cost per mile of $57.8M; and for the Greenfield Corridor Alternative (220MPH), length is 273 miles with a cost per mile of $30.9M.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to say that the proposed light rail from Tucker to Charlotte would be amazing opportunity for Atlanta and Tucker community. I would 

love it if planning was done along with Atlanta MARTA to connect the train station to a marta station for ease of travel. Tucker would be a great 

location!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. It should be clarified that "high-speed rail", as 

called for in the Project's Purpose and Need Statement (in the Executive Summary), is very different from "light Rail", a much slower technology typically 

employed within urban areas (including Charlotte).
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Please create the new corridor. Only by having the maximum amount of speed in the minimum amount of time will a high speed rail network be 

used. Also wherever possible, it needs to be tied to a mass transit hub so that passengers do not need to rent a car, but have other options to 

proceed to their destinations. I am commenting now online as I will be unable to attend the meeting due to work.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. It is anticipated that the project will be 

constructed to then-current world-class standards.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

We need improved rail service between Charlotte and Atlanta; I drive or fly that route monthly. Ideally the train would run at least 4 times a day. 

Also, Ideally it would connect the Atlanta airport (or MARTA) to the Charlotte airport. The airports are our transportation hubs.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Stations are planned at the airports along the 

route.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I am very much in favor of the new corridor solution for high-speed trains between Charlotte and Atlanta, but I believe the train should allow 

vehicles to be carried, meaning passengers can drive their cars on to the train in Charlotte and then once in Atlanta (two hours later) they can drive 

off.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Carrying cars on trains requires special railcars which are not capable of safe operation at the high speeds (up to 220 mph) anticipated in this FEIS/ROD. 

Experience in other parts of the world where service carrying private cars on slower trains has been offerred is that its popularity has declined over time and 

most of them have been discontinued. An exception has been Amtrak Auto Train, a train that transports cars and their owners from Lorton, VA to Sanford, FL. 

While the trian is limited to 70 mph (less than other passenger trains on the line) the service is popular, particularly with people relocating for months at a 

time. 

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I support high speed rail in the Southeast, but I do not support only a line from Charlotte to Atlanta without incorporating South Carolina's other 

congested metro areas. Specifically, Charleston and Columbia MUST be included in any potential routes in order for it to be effective. Those metro 

areas outside of Atlanta and Charlotte also need to create better inner-city transportation in order for this to be attractive. I would ride a train from 

Columbia (my home) to Washington, DC, because I know when I get there, I will have several options to get around. Places like Columbia however, 

barely have a functioning transportation network.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a national 

rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1.Each state also has its own 

rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, environmental analyses of specific corridors.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Great idea! If this was already in place I’d ride to Savannah for vacation and even go to CLT for a fun weekend. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a 

national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Please make a high speed train line between Atlanta and Charlotte. It would be great to have one between Atlanta and Birmingham and Atlanta and 

Chattanooga too.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a national 

rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1.The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a great idea for not only Atlanta, but for SC and NC as well. I have three sons graduating from college in the next 4 years. This would expand 

their opportunities and stay close to home. Need a plan for Chattanooga and Nashville, and another for Savannah and Jacksonville.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project.The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a national 

rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors. FRA and GDOT have completed a Tier I FEIS/ROD for the Atlanta to Chattanooga Corridor. More information can 

be found here http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoChattanooga.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Building a rail line to Charlotte should be done. My only complaint is that it will not be completed in my lifetime. After extensive travels in Europe 

we have grown to love a robust public transportation system and it is a shame that the USA and Georgia has not looked to develop one sooner. 

Travel to Macon, Savannah, and Brunswick should be future considerations. The fact that Georgia has no local regional and national public 

transportation plan is foolish and short sighted. Please develop a comprehensive rail and public transportation program. You will have my support. 

 Thanks. Charles Platz

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a national 

rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

We have needed trains for over 25 years! Please let’s get one to Chattanooga to Atl, to Savanah and more Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

 The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project.The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a national 

rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors. FRA and GDOT have completed a Tier I EIS for the Atlanta to Chattanooga Corridor. More information can be 

found here http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoChattanooga
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to be able to access this route; however, I completely stand behind the people on and near the path. I would hope it would bring more 

income and accessibility to them, but I vote with them. Meanwhile, I'm in Cobb. Am jealous we aren't discussing a train to Chattanooga!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

High speed rail needs to happen - we need alternatives on the East Coast. ATL to Charlotte, Charlotte to Richmond, Richmond to DC, Philadelphia, 

NY and Boston.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. An important part of the Purpose for the 

Atlanta-Charlotte project is its role as a key part of the Southeast Corridor to Washington DC, conncting there to the Northeast Corridor.

 An important part of the Purpose for the Atlanta-Charlotte project is its role as a key part of the Southeast Corridor to Washington DC, conncting there to the 

Northeast Corridor.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

More trains including a direct route to Savannah Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a 

national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors.An FEIS/ROD for the Atlanta-Chattanooga corridor was issued in 2017. 

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I can’t think of a better thing to happen than Hi speed rail to Charlotte from Atlanta. Stopping in Greenville! Also please to Chattanooga as well. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a 

national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1.The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors. FRA and GDOT completed a Tier FEIS/ROD for the Atlanta to Chattanooga Corridor. More information can be 

found here http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoChattanooga.
Written 

Comment

I am very much in favor of high speed rail from Charlotte to Atlanta. I woud also like to see a route from Charleston to Greenville. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

 The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a 

national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors .An FEIS/ROD for the Atlanta-Chattanooga corridor was issued in 2017.

Court Reporter

I find the project very exciting. We have needed more passenger rail in Georgia, and this sounds wonderful. I take Amtrak, the Southern Crescent. I 

love it, but it is very slow and it is only once a day in each direction. We actually need trains to also connect us with Florida and with Chicago. That's 

mainly it, Florida and Chicago. A high speed train that connects us with Charlotte to Washington DC would be wonderful. All major highly industrial 

nations have wonderful train service in addition to air service. It is the only way to go in terms of having alternatives for traveling. One thing that I 

think about every once in a while is a terrorist threat could shut down the entire air system; but it can't shut down an entire rail system. It can only 

shut down one region or one line versus what happened with 9/11. So if for no other reason, that's a great reason to have an extensive and fast rail 

system and high speed system to be better. I have traveled Europe a number of times. I am getting ready to travel now in Eastern Europe. Train 

service is extremely usable. You can go from Prague to Munich to Amsterdam multiple times every day, and we need that kind of service here. The 

same is true for China. The same is true for Japan and India. So I am excited that we are at least talking about it. I may not live long enough to see it, 

but I would love to know that there is going to be high speed rail connecting Atlanta to major cities in the United States.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a 

national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors.

Court Reporter

When I was ten years old, my dad took me to Emory station to watch the last Silver Comet come through that station in the late 60's. I would dearly 

love to see something high speed run along the CSX corridor running through Tucker, Lawrenceville, Athens and up to the Carolinas, to Charlotte, 

the way the old Silver Comet used to run, or as close to it as possible. I am in full support of anything that puts passengers on rail. That's it.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

he Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a 

national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I’m in support of this project! The US needs more public transit options. My main concern is human trafficking though; how will these be 

monitored/patrolled to ensure people aren’t being trafficked?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Law enforcement is beyond the scope of this Project; however, safety and security of passengers is always a top priority for safe public transportation. Human 

trafficking would be addressed in a service safety plan that would be required by federal and state agencies as part of the implementation and commissioning 

of service on the corridor after the completion of Tier 1 and Tier 2 environmental reviews.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

A train between Atlanta and other local large cities is an excellent idea to increase the economic development of the south region. An even better 

idea would be commuter trains from Atlanta to; Alpharetta, Kennesaw and, Gwinnett. Traffic along 400, 75, and 85 needs a mass transit solution for 

economic and environmental reasons as well as to reduce congestion and allow inner city businesses to attact talent.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

While providing commuter rail service within the Atlanta region is not part of the Purpose and Need for the Atlanta-Charlotte Project, tracks provided for 

intercity passenger trains can also accommodate commuter rail service. Specifics of potential commuter rail service for the Atlanta region can be included in a 

future Tier 2 analysis of the Atlanta Approach for the overall Atlanta-Charlotte Project.

Court Reporter

Today is my birthday. For my birthday I would like for them to put the one in Tucker because it is close to me. That's it. I want to see a train, so 

noise, vibration, I want.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I have been to Japan and Europe and have ridden truly high-speed rail. You need to keep the stops to a minimum. Starting at the airport and then 

stopping within 5 - 10 miles is ridiculous. People can drive or shuttle or take Marta to a single starting point. There should be no less than 50 -100 

miles between stations. Schedule also needs to be adheared to.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

The idea to run a train from DC to ATL is excellent-- lots of folks travel up and down the inland east coast, and using already existing tracks would 

add to the already environmentally friendly nature of the project.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. An important part of the Purpose for the 

Atlanta-Charlotte project is its role as a key part of the Southeast Corridor to Washington DC, conncting there to the Northeast Corridor. The optimum 

operating plan, including whether trips through to DC will require a change of trains, will be made in later stages of the Project Development process. 

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to see high speed rail that connected Charlotte to other major cities! This is so common in other countries! Atlanta is a great first step, 

then DC, Philly, and New York!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. An important part of the Purpose for the 

Atlanta-Charlotte project is its role as a key part of the Southeast Corridor to Washington DC, conncting there to the Northeast Corridor. The optimum 

operating plan, including whether trips through to DC will require a change of trains, will be made in later stages of the Project Development process. 

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Like the idea of Atl- Charlotte connection. I don't understand however how this will move forward when we can't get support for rail between AtlAthens or a County airport.Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Responses to the DEIS indicate widespread 

support for high speed rail service between Atlanta and Charlotte. The FEIS/ROD has selected a route that would serve Athens as the Preferred Alternative. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this is an amazing idea. I believe people would use this rail as long as prices are cheeper then flights. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Please create the new corridor so we can have high-quality, high speed rail transportation between Atlanta and Charlotte! The current Amtrak route 

is incredibly slow and inaccessible for a lot of passengers, and we do not need more cars going between Charlotte and Atlanta. The only way to get 

people off the road is to incentivize rail travel -- and creating a rail that would get you from Charlotte to Atlanta in two hours would do it. I'd also 

like to know how you plan to make this route accessible for people of all incomes and classes. Charlotte has become a playground for the rich as of 

late, and I worry that things like public transportation are becoming unaffordable. How do you plan to help poorer folks afford this?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Wonderful idea and highly support, as long as it is made affordable. The problem with the NE Corridor Amtrak trains and why I rarely took them 

when I lived in NY for a decade was the cost. For such an idea to work, it would need to be affordable (eg maybe $20 or less from Athens to ATL). 

Otherwise the only ppl riding will be expense account businessmen. But I 100% support the idea. Long overdue in this area.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I am for the project. I am concerned for the environment and how GDOT will reinvest to the people/nature involved Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to be part of this Innovative effort. Where do I apply? We could stand to look to our forefathers and the life changing benefits of the 

Transcontinental Railroad. The social and economic impacts of a multi state rail system would generate direct growth through expanding markets 

and affordable transit. It would provide for partnerships and exchange of ideas. This movement between states would allow for business 

professionals to have a more expansive idea of their industry and allow improved access to information and skills. 

(https://gtgtechnologygroup.com/transcontinental-railroad/ ) Passengers would benefit from the speed and relative safety of traveling by train. The 

social benefits of time spent with friends and family without the headaches of traffic navigation would increase leisure travel. Reduced fatality 

incidents due to non-restricted social media/phone use. Thank you for considering community, social and economic impacts and most importantly 

the lost art of communication and connectivity.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I am a 35 year Veteran of Blacksburg Volunteer Fire Department. I have seen numerous wrecks on I-85 and on the Norfolk Southern Line that runs 

through our town. In every event, speed has been a contributing factor. At 220 mph, you are asking for a major problem. Will this be on the 

existing Norfolk line that runs through Greenville SC to Charlotte?

The FEIS/ROD has selected high-speed rail on the greenfield alignment, operating on dedicated tracks with no at-grade crossings, ensuring safety. In 2018, a 

Federal railroad Administration rule change amending 49 CFR part 238 allows trains to operate at 220 mph in the United States. This final rule adds a new tier 

of passenger equipment safety standards (Tier III) to facilitate the safe implementation of nation-wide, interoperable high-speed passenger rail service at 

speeds up to 220 mph. While Tier III trainsets must operate in an exclusive right-of-way without grade crossings at speeds above 125 mph, these trainsets can 

share the right-of-way with freight trains and other tiers of passenger equipment at speeds not exceeding 125 mph. This final rule also establishes 

crashworthiness and occupant protection performance requirements in the alternative to those currently specified for Tier I passenger trainsets. Please visit 

the Federal Register for more information: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/11/21/2018-25020/passenger-equipment-safety-standardsstandards-for-alternative-compliance-and-high-speed-trainsets.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I like this idea but , I wonder how safe a train running 220 mph would really be. I live in the Savannah area and heard about this through local 

media. I would attend a public meeting but doubt one will be held in my area.

The FEIS/ROD has selected high-speed rail on the Greenfield alignment, operating on dedicated tracks with no at-grade crossings, ensuring safety. In 2018, a 

Federal railroad Administration rule change amending 49 CFR part 238 allows trains to operate at 220 mph in the United States. This final rule adds a new tier 

of passenger equipment safety standards (Tier III) to facilitate the safe implementation of nation-wide, interoperable high-speed passenger rail service at 

speeds up to 220 mph. While Tier III trainsets must operate in an exclusive right-of-way without grade crossings at speeds above 125 mph, these trainsets can 

share the right-of-way with freight trains and other tiers of passenger equipment at speeds not exceeding 125 mph. This final rule also establishes 

crashworthiness and occupant protection performance requirements in the alternative to those currently specified for Tier I passenger trainsets. Please visit 

the Federal Register for more information: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/11/21/2018-25020/passenger-equipment-safety-standardsstandards-for-alternative-compliance-and-high-speed-trainsets.
11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Hopeful for the Greenfield Line to come to Tucker, Georgia. As a resident of Metro Atlanta for 45 years, this will be very beneficial to the area! I 

fully support this and look forward to using it frequently.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Greenfield option that goes through Athens. I would use this a lot to travel to and from Atlanta and it would be great for reducing 

traffic congestion in NE Georgia.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to see this built and have a stop in Tucker, GA on the Greenfield line! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

As a Tucker resident, I and my family of 6 are very much in favor of the Greenfield line. We travel up the I-85 corridor fairly often, and often are 

concerned for our safety (in addition to all the traffic), and it's only going to get worse. Our family and friends from here to Charlotte would use this 

line often. In addition, having the line stop here in Tucker would be a boon for the area, bringing visitors to an up-and-coming center of growth, 

vision, and diversity. What a wonderful alternative to all the stress and pollution of sitting in traffic, whether traveling to the airport or to Charlotte. 

 Thank you!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

We are in favor of the Greenfield Line with stops in Tucker and Athens. It would be so beneficial for UGA students Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to see this built and have a stop in Tucker, GA on the Greenfield line! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I am strongly in favor of the Greenfield Line with a station in Tucker. The Greenfield Line also goes through Athens which is huge advantage over the 

other alignments. Let’s get this done!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love a corridor through Athens to Atlanta and Charlotte. I see nothing but positives here. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I am strongly in support of rail connecting Athens to Atlanta and Charlotte (the Greenfield corridor). Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I support having a stop in Tucker GA (alt 6). Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

The proposed high-speed rail link between Atlanta and Charlotte -- particularly the 'Greenfield' route which passes through Athens -- is welcome, 

forward-thinking, and long overdue. Let's make it happen!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I'm writing to support the Greenfield option for high-speed rail service b/w ATL and Charlotte - would be great for the development of UGA to have 

a stop in Athens.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield route is perfect as it stops at all three airports as well as Anderson. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I vote for the Green line thru Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

If you bring a train through Gastonia the station you place will be a horrible loitering spot for some of the worst of Gastonia. We can’t even have a 

nice QT gas station (BESIDE THE POLICE DEPARTMENT), less than a year after it was built an employee was stabbed by a loitering patron. If you stick 

the route away from city congestion less crime should come. Stick with the Greenfield route to avoid a future of security issues.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I want to express support for the Greenfield line passing through Athens. Having the high-speed rail pass through Athens as many merits. The main 

one being that the University of Georgia will be able to add a considerable amount to riders to the system if a stop is added in Athens. Athens has a 

very active public transit-using community and having a train go to Charlotte will be very popular among the student crowd here. Among all the 

towns between Atlanta and Charlotte, Athens is one of the most populated (medium-density) and is capable of adding passengers to the system. 

There is an unused railroad that passes through the heart of the Athens UGA campus and if there is any possibility of UGA or Athens starting their 

own rail transit someday, that currently unused railroad connects to the Greenfield line.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I have read about the three different options being considered for the rail line, and I favor the Greenfield Corridor idea. I am very much in favor of 

providing more and better mass transit, particularly for environmental reasons.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

My preferred alternative is the greenfield corridor alternative. The speed / travel-time is the best of all three options, increasing the viability of the 

route, compared with driving or flying. It is also a reasonable cost, especially compared with the I-85 option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Fully support high-speed passenger rail through upstate South Carolina, connecting Charlotte and Atlanta. Greenfield route is the best alternative. 

Thank you for your work on this project.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I heartily endorse the proposal to construct high-speed rail between Atlanta and Charlotte, but it would be a shame if the route did not go through 

Athens. What could be more desirable than serving the state's main university? As I understand it, the Athens route (Greenfield) would cost less 

than the I85 route, and I think it would be ridiculous for Athenians to have to drive to Commerce to catch the train--no, it's not a huge distance, but 

a lot more of your traffic will originate in Athens than in Commerce. As for the Crescent route, I don't see the point at all.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love a train to Athens and Charlotte. Could really cut down game day traffic to UGA. As for Charlotte easy access to another thriving southern 

city

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

We need a tram from atl to Charlotte this will enable economic growth in both cites especially if it passes through Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

The route through Athens would be desirable as it would connect students at the University of Georgia to 2 airport options and the greater Atlanta 

metro area allowing them to leave their cars at home while attending school. Providing young adults with positive public transit experiences is the 

best way to increase ridership in the future.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield route is the most logical and is the best route of the three. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

As a resident of downtown Tucker, as a businessman and lawyer in Lawrenceville, and as a new parent who wants to see the economy of Georgia 

flourish for generations to come, I fully support the green field alternative Atlanta-CSX solution utilizing electric tracks. Routing a high speed train 

through Atlanta, Tucker, Lawrenceville, Athens, the Greenville Airport and Charlotte stands to be option that creates the greatest return on 

investment. The connection through Athens is particularly important as it would link one of our country’s great research universities to the two 

largest financial centers of the South, allowing for the creation of more direct paths for investment and entrepreneurship. Additionally, this route 

offers the highest speeds and fastest transit times between the two cities and their transportation hubs, which is necessary to ensure increased 

ridership. That increased ridership also stands to do the most good in terms of reduction of automobile emissions, which will ensure that future 

generations of Georgians can enjoy cleaner air and healthier and happier lives. While this option is not the cheapest, in the spirit of the phrase “you 

get what you pay for,” it would be the most positively impactful option. I’ve taken the crescent line north to Washington, D.C. and was shocked at 

the slow pace of the route compared with other routes between major cities. Atlanta was put on the National map by investment in steam engine 

train routes in the 19th century and on the global map through investments in the airport in the 20th century; in order to ensure it’s continued 

leadership in the 21st century we must make a comparable investment in new transportation technology and this high speed electric route is 

exactly what we need. I recently finished an around the world trip for work and I was shocked by how fast, convenient, and efficient it was to travel 

by high speed train in Europe and Asia compared to options here in the U.S. With this investment, we have the opportunity to set the bar in the 

South East and the broader United States, proving we remain the nation’s leader in transportation. Let’s make this happen!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of the Greenfield Corridor. I think it makes the best sense as it relates to time and speed. I think the whole idea of HSR is exciting and 

can be a game changer for not only Anderson but the Upstate region.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

It would be beneficial to have the route going through Athens as it is heavily populated area with a large number of travelers going between Athens 

and Atlanta daily. It would ease the traffic flow and increase economic development, benefiting many smaller cities around the corridor.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

As a Tucker resident who would be using this line often, I strongly advocate for the Greenfield corridor with the CSX approach to connect Athens, 

Tucker, and downtown Atlanta. With family and work opportunities in North Carolina, I know my family and I would use this line frequently if it were 

put in place. After the ATL-Charlotte line is built, we hope to see further extension to the Northeast Regional line to connect Atlanta easily to D.C. 

and New York. For both environmental and functional purposes, I hope to see an electric line built in place of diesel, likely ruling out the Southern 

Crescent. I am so happy that this is being considered, and know that it would be an economic stimulus to Atlanta and cities along the high-speed 

corridor.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Sustain Charlotte supports the Tier 1 study on the proposed passenger rail from Charlotte to Atlanta. Out of the three possible corridors and the two 

train technologies, we recommend the electric train option in the Greenfield corridor. It would produce the highest impact on driving behavior 

between Charlotte and Atlanta. The 220 mph speed with a travel time of two hours and six minutes will provide a quick and superior alternative to 

driving. This option would be more cost-effective, more efficient in moving people, all the while reducing the carbon emissions from automobiles. 

Thank you

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 
11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Please do this. A rail to CLT with connections to Athens would do wonders for th economy for the three cities Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the greenfield alignment because it's the alternative with the fastest travel time. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

The greenfield corridor would help Athens grow responsibly and create a viable rail network for our own proposed light-rail to tie into. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

An Athens stop is key to the lines success as a alternative transportation link from Atlanta to UGA. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I moved out of Georgia in 2018 in part due to the lack of infrastructure like this. Though my preference is the Greenfield route that runs through 

Athens, any of these projects would go a long way in getting me and others like me to return home.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to see the corridor to run through Athens. Be it a is already operating as a suburb of Atlanta. It is time we plan for improving our ability 

to move about.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

My name is Tommy Malcom and I also currently serve as a Council Representative from Georgia on the Rail Passengers Association (formerly the National Association of Railroad 

Passengers). I applaud Georgia's Department of Transportation (GDOT) partnering with other agencies to study the feasibility of high speed rail along the corridor between Atlanta 

and Charlotte in connection with other sections combining to ultimately link with our Nation's Capitol. I believe the Atlanta-Charlotte high-speed rail component for the Piedmont 

Atlantic Megaregion's growth as identified by the America 2050 organization is not a matter of if but when. I have several requests which I would like responded to. First, please 

give strategic consideration that in the same time frame of Atlanta-Charlotte high speed rail coming into being, Northeast Georgia may very well become the preferred and ideal 

location for a second major airport to address Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport landlocked congestion. Likely airfields already exist with available growth land which 

could either reroute air-cargo entirely and/or serve as passenger options. Specifically, the fields are Jackson County Airport (KJCA) near Jefferson, Barrow County Airport (KWDR) 

near Winder, and Gwinnett County Airport - Briscoe Field (KLZU) near Lawrenceville. All three existing fields are near the dense area of the I-85 corridor. All three of these fields are 

highly accessible to much of Northeast Georgia's projected population growth. Please consider station placement with this possibility of optimal connectivity with future air-travel 

projections. Secondly, I am also of the understanding that those tasked with making decisions regarding Georgia's future should keep their eyes focused on the existing roadbed of 

Georgia Highway 20 (SR 20) as a probable outer arc route to assist I-285 as population continues to sprawl beyond the City of Atlanta in the coming decades. Thirdly, I understand 

that the Greenfield is the most expensive but long-term would afford the quickest travel time and highest ridership estimates. Please give ample consideration to the optimal 

connectivity with college and university campuses along all proposed routes as these also tend to heavily influence overall community growth, employment, and life-quality 

dynamics. Ultimately, I hope decision makers will recognize that the growth that is coming to our Piedmont Atlantic Megaregion (2050) will demand multiple transportation 

modes beyond interstate highway lanes alone and the time has come to address the reality. At this point, I strongly believe delaying implementation decisions will only create larger 

hurdles for future generations of Georgians. Please let me know how I can assist in you efforts with encouraging decision makers at all levels to move forward. I want to stay 

informed and involved in your efforts over the coming months, years, and decades. I would like to know about and assist with regional communication and planning efforts 

something this magnitude require. I am also willing to serve in some community stakeholder role to help with the Atlanta to Charlotte process. I appreciate your consideration of 

my input and willingness to officially further serve the Atlanta to Charlotte endeavor. Please place me on your contact and mailing lists. Move Forward! Tommy Malcom Post 

Office Box 50 Watkinsville, Georgia 30677 tommymalcom@yahoo.com

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. It will be up to the proponents of Tier 2 analysis 

to consider how to best coordinate with the potential future developments outlined in the comment.
11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Please choose the Greenfield route that passes through Athens! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield route would be a great additional form of transportation to the area.The bus system we currently have is overwhelmed between 

UGA's student population and the public's need. The University of Georgia has an unused rail line that connects to the proposed greenfield route 

and cuts through campus, The Classic Center plans to have an arena built connected to the multi-modal station, and overall would be a great use on 

Football Saturdays in the South.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Connecting Atlanta to neighboring cities would be beneficial for all parties: traffic to and from Atlanta would be greatly reduced, as a result, there 

would be less time wasted, and that would help boost productivity. Additionally, I live in Athens, GA, and having an easy and fast way to commute 

to Atlanta would help me find more job opportunities.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

As a resident of Athens for 27 years, I believe that a passenger Rail from Atlanta to Athens to Charlotte would be the most ideal option. Athens is 

home to a major state University that would benefit from transit to Atlanta and Charlotte. This option also is the most economical based on the 

length of time for the trip. I am in full support of the Greenfield passenger Rail.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Need Greenfield route on Atlanta to Charlotte rail. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield Corridor looks to be the cheapest and shortest distance. You could always build spurs to other cities if needed. It would be a great benefit 

to traffic and people having to move between Atlanta and Athens. Could also promote tourism in both directions. It is getting to be too hard to drive 

to Atlanta!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Please go through Athens! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Green line is best. 85 corridor possible. Clemson line at slower speed not worth it. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

I would very much like it if the proposed train would traverse through Athens/Clarke County. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Please bring high speed rail to Anderson! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe the speed rail should pass through Athens-Clarke County. This would promote more eco-friendly travel for students and visitors to the 

Athens area. Because of the vast amount of influx of people into the Athens area for large events, this could help with the economic and 

environmental development and impact of Georgia.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Please have the Atlanta Charlotte high speed rail line stop in Athens, GA. This could greatly improve traffic on 85 and 316, especially on Georgia 

football game days. It could reduce many vehicles on the road as students travel from the university to Atlanta or the Atlanta airport, which would 

mean less young drivers on the road.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to see the train go thru Athens. As a fellow Dawg in a wheelchair there isn’t a public transportation system that navigates to this 

bubbling city. It would also help bring students home who live in ATL and want to see their family but don’t have a car like myself.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

I would prefer the Greenfield alternative. The advantages a dedicated new rail track presents outweigh the cost component. The Acela Express runs 

on a shared trackage similar to the Crescent alternative and it has presented numerous issues with both timeliness and ability of the train to achieve 

the speed required to be a high speed rail. In addition, the Greenfield alternative runs through Athens which would allow for speedy transport to 

Atlanta, where the highways in between have rather high amounts of congestion. In the ridership data presented, the Greenfield alternative has the 

potential to both be the fastest travel time and have the greatest ridership, at the second greatest expense of the 3 primary routes. If we are going 

to spend all of this money, it should at least be a high speed train we can be proud of.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like the railway to be built and stop in athens. We need it Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like the GREENFIELD ROUTE which would provide the fastest means of transportation. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Total support, would prefer the greenfield alternative for the fastest alternative. We make multiple trips per month into Atlanta and to GSP, would 

be a regular user of this service.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

A route through Anderson near Lake Hartwell would be great!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

As a student in UGA, i am so excited that this rail line could connect Athens directly with Atlanta airport and downtown Atlanta! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

I’m expressing support for the high-speed rail service between Atlanta and Charlotte, specifically in support of ”the Greenfield option” — with a stop 

in Athens.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

Just a vote from a long-time Athens-Clarke County resident for the corridor through Athens. It's been discussed for years, and of course, the state's 

flagship University is here...

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

Comment: The Greenfield Corridor seems to make the most sense. The price per projected passenger is the most ideal, the speed and cost are 

relatively great investments, and has least impact compared to the amount of people and money spent. I have always believed that with the right 

connection, Athens could be a prosperous city and with this corridor, it would encourage more companies to spread out towards the University and 

across North East Georgia.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield route seems like the most cost effective along with travel duration being reasonable Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support the Greenfield option Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

I would support the greenfield corridor. It would be very convenient to get to Atlanta or Charlotte from Athens. Currently there is no options besides 

driving or a very long bus drive.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield option Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

The Charlotte to Atlanta train should run through Athens. There is a large population traveling to and from Athens to Atlanta and Athens to 

greenville who would greatly benefit from this train line.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the greenfield alternative because it allows for the fastest travel time. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I highly support the idea of high speed rail between Atlanta and Charlotte. I'd especially love to see the Greenfield option. Athens once had 5 

separate railway lines converging here and now there's not a single passenger train coming through.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield makes the most sense. You’re wanting to have the least amount of travel time between two metro cities. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield route Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Greenfield corridor option for the high-speed rail project that would run from Atlanta to Charlotte. The Greenfield option is superior to 

the two alternatives because it is the only one that runs through Athens, a city that is poorly serviced by regional transportation options given its 

size and demographics. This corridor choice would benefit not only Athens and the other underserved communities in its scope, but also provide 

unique benefits to the anchor cities of Atlanta and Charlotte, and more broadly to the state of Georgia itself. 1. Athens has become a hub of tech 

business development. Connecting it to other centers of technological innovation in the Southeast High Speed Rail Corridor would facilitate that 

growth and be a force multiplier for the development of new technology and venture partnerships. 2. Athens has a large number of workers as 

well as students who commute large distances, many of them coming from or going to Atlanta. (I commuted by car from Athens for ten years when I 

worked at the Georgia Tech Research Institute. I cannot express how much I wish I had had a high-speed rail option.) High-speed rail service could 

reduce the related highway congestion, carbon footprint, and transportation cost while giving those workers productive time during their commute. 

 3. Athens has no commercial passenger air (despite having an airport, yes). Residents of the area, including not only the 40,000 university students 

and faculty, but also people living in surrounding counties, have to drive at least 80 miles to get to an airport. A high-speed rail option would 

dramatically lower travelers' carbon footprint, lower the cost and time of getting to and from the airport, and raise Athens' desirability to employers 

and workers. In summary, the Greenfield corridor option is superior to the others because it will promote smart, sustainable growth that benefits 

the state of Georgia—not just one city.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Please go through Athens! This would help so much with gameday traffic from the surrounding areas and students commuting to Atlanta to get to 

the airport. It would be fantastic foresight to bring this transportation to an area that is growing and becoming more economically attractive. I for 

one would definitely have visited Atlanta more often if I didn't have to drive there and I know many people feel the same way

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love for this rail to come through Athens, GA. I drive frequently to and from Atlanta for work meetings, concerts, sporting events, etc., and 

would absolutely utilize this form of transportation.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Please select the Greenfield option, with a stop in Athens. This would be a massive boon for students and for academic collaboration. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I think high speed rail would make the most sense to serve the most people and this could be done if the railway went through Athens, Greenville 

and Spartenburg.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield Route Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the green route! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield alternative for the high speed corridor is great! I hope it'll be electric! Let's move the South into the 21st century! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield Route Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

As an Athens resident and UGA professor, I would like to express my support for the rail corridor, particularly the "Greenfield" option through 

Athens. This corridor would relieve congestion on the roads, enhance collaboration between UGA and Atlanta-based universities, and provide 

Atlanta-based students economical transport to UGA-based classes.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Please include Athens on the route! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing to strongly support the Greenfield option. As someone who has to commute to Atlanta from Athens, and suffer the dangerous corridor 

that is 316, this would be an amazing relief on the hideous traffic that is my experience every time I drive to Atlanta. Greenfield is the most highlyrated alternative based on several years of data gathering, and the relief that I have been hearing about since moving to Athens 30 years ago. 

PLEASE make it happen! This would be a game-changer.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I love the Atlanta/Charlotte high speed rail proposal--especially the Greenfield option with a stop in Athens. I would become a regular user, as would 

many of my Atlanta-based students.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield is as good as we are going to get in planing. But the southern crescent is one of the most asinine proposals I’ve seen for a while. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Traffic around Atlanta continues to worsen and without improvements in infrastructure, the problem will seriously hamper growth of not only 

Atlanta but the surrounding areas. A high speed railway will help tremendously with this problem. The Greenfield option, especially, will go a long 

way in not only in easing traffic congestion around Atlanta, but also in connecting Georgia more closely and efficiently with major cities in the South.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing to express my strong support for a rail line between Atlanta and Charlotte and particularly for the Greenfield alternative. I live in 

Athens, GA and work at the University of Georgia, and a rail connection to Atlanta and to Charlotte would be invaluable to me personally and 

professionally. It would also provide a safe alternative for undergraduates from the Atlanta area, who often drive both tired and too fast going to 

and coming from campus. Lastly, and most importantly, this rail connection would allow UGA to increase its connections to the Atlanta and 

Charlotte areas and heighten its economic benefit to the state of Georgia.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of the Greenfield Route. While, as an Athens, Georgia resident, I would like to have the high-speed rail line available here, there are 

other reasons why I support the Greenfield Route. It is arguably the best line overall when factoring in cost, ridership and travel time. According to 

HNTB and the Revenue and Ridership analysis, this line is projected to have the highest ridership, end-to-end travel time is the quickest, and the 

cost, while not the lowest of the three, is still within a reasonable range. I am wholeheartedly in favor of a high-speed train connecting Charlotte 

and Atlanta and other high-population cities in between. Building more and bigger highways is unsustainable in terms of cost, traffic and pollution.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support the highspeed rail from Atlanta to Charlotte, the Greenfield option! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Greenfield option. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing to express my strong support for the Greenfield rail line between Atlanta and Charlotte. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of the development of a new “greenfield” high-speed rail corridor between Atlanta and Charlotte. I travel from Athens to Atlanta up to 

3 times a week for work, and would use this option for travel.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a repeat, but I forgot to say "Please pick Athens"! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield route Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the southern route with a stop in Anderson! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

Prefer Greenfield route Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

The third option that goes south of Anderson with a stop at GSP International Airport seems most practical. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

I vote for the Greenfield Corridor. I think that the GSP airport would be a great terminus for a trip to Charlotte or Atlanta. People could either get a 

ride from downtown Greenville to the airport, or ride from their home to the airport. Many of us who would use the train live in surrounding areas, 

and it would be a pain to have to go into downtown Greenville to catch a train. Present station is in blighted area. The GSP airport is vibrant, people 

there all the time, safe. I think some Greenville travelers who would use the train are people who would want to take the train from GSP to the 

Charlotte airport, or to the Atlanta airport. I would hope that this Greenfield Corridor would allow them to do this. I would like to work with others 

on this project to see this happen, I believe in train service.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

Route 3 Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

Route 3 Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Greenfield option. It is the cheapest and allows the highest speeds. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

I vote for the fastest route, thru the "Greenfield Corridor" Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

Route that goes through Athens Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

I and many of my friends and family would make great use of the route that goes through Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

I support this project and hope it will move forward with the fastest option, which appears to be the greenfields route. I travel to Atlanta for 

business and pleasure, and this would be a terrific option. Flying takes 4-5 hours with security, getting to/from airports, etc., and driving has big risk 

of traffic. High speed rail would be better than both.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

Definitely a huge need with the constant traffic and construction on I-85 between the two cities. Love the possibility of under 3 hr trip between the 

two and especially it being electric. High cost for the greenville option but has the highest impact downfield and also will reduce the amount of 

money needed to spend on road upkeep and overall construction cost.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the proposed Greenfield railway line from Atlanta to Charlotte. The stop in Athens would greatly enhance our small city, allowing citizens 

easier access to the Atlanta airport as well as relieving some of the traffic congestion on Interstate 85. It would also ensure that visitors to UGA's 

many events and convention-goers could more easily travel from Atlanta to Athens. In addition, the university attracts people from all over the 

country -- indeed, the world. There is a great need for easier, faster, and more efficient transportation to the state's one international airport.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

I have a strong preference for the Greenfield line as an Athens resident in a household that frequently travels back and forth between Atlanta. We 

would make use of this rail going west as well as east.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

The "Greenfield" route seems to be the best alternative for costs, speed, etc. and I support this one. Having a passenger rail link to CLT will greatly 

advance our state.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

Generally, I like the concept. I think I like the "greenfield" option the best. I'm worried that Amtrack and Clemson will lose it's line, if the crescent is 

used; and I-85 is just too hectic to try and go along with it, especially with the way they keep expanding it. Think the other route may help with 

transportation options and businesses, since it's not growing as fast as other areas. Think something like this will keep my kids in the area versus 

moving away in the years to come. And since I don't like planes, this would give me another option too versus driving all the time. Thanks for all your 

hard work on this. I hope it happens and benefits the areas in a good way.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

I would be for a high speed train that goes between Atlanta and Charlotte, via Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

I would be for a high speed train that goes between Atlanta and Charlotte, via Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

Based on the expected ratios of Revenue to Operation & Maintenance cost and the forecast ridership counts, clearly options 2 and 3 look better 

than option 1. While option 2 would benefit from the synergy with 85 (infrastructure, destinations already near interstate, etc.), I think option 3 

would offer riders a greener pathway that would differentiate the mode of transportation. It also could spur some additional growth around the 

Athens to Anderson corridor, as opposed to keeping everything centered around I-85.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

I fully support development of the proposed Greenfield high speed rail line. According to HNTB's revenue and ridership analysts, the Greenfield line 

would cost between $6.2 and $8.4 billion (in 2012 dollars), with an end-to-end travel time between 2 hours and 6 minutes and 2 hours and 44 

minutes. In contrast, the I-85 route would cost at least twice as much (estimated $13.3 - $15.4 billion in 2012 dollars). The two lines are projected to 

have similar ridership, with Greenfield having a predicted annual ridership of 5.38 million to 6.30 million and I-85 having a predicted annual ridership 

of 5.50 to 5.62 million by 2050. Other proposed lines, such as the Southern Crescent, may be less expensive to construct, but will have much longer 

end-to-end travel time (estimated at 4 hours and 35 minutes to 5 hours and 34 minutes) and would likely generate less revenue because its 

projected ridership is much smaller. The Greenfield route seems to be the best investment upfront for the greatest future yield.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I’d love for the speed rail to be put in place, the Greenfield rail is preferred. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the greenfield route going through Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the best line to move forward with would be the Greenfield line. It makes the most sense given how much traffic comes to and from Athens 

everyday.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield Corrider would be amazing for Georgia! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I prefer the greenfield route. This is an excellent idea and a tremendous growth opportunity for the entire 85 corridor Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

In favor of GREENFIELD Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to express support for a high speed train from Atlanta to Charlotte with a corridor through Athens, GA. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I feel like a train system will be highly beneficial, especially between Atlanta and Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I am glad to see that the Greenfield Corridor alternative is rated as the best option since this alternative would serve Athens. This route could 

significantly reduce traffic on 316 and 85. It would be great to be able to travel to the Atlanta Airport or an event in downtown Atlanta without 

needing a car. This is a much needed project.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

Vote for Greenfield route or more specifically any route that goes through Athens.I wish there was a route that went through Athens and then also 

stopped on the south side of Greenville, but the Athens portion is most important for us at the University.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I’d love to see the high speed railway come through Athens!! (Greenfield line). Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I am strongly in favor of building the high speed rail from charlotte to Atlanta. The middle priced route that would flow through Athens GA would be 

ideal, due to the speed. It would be a unique travel offering, one that I personally would utilize very often!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

would love to see the Greenfield Corridor selected. Not only is it the fastest, but is the most pragmatic. The Southern Crescent route is so slow 

most would just prefer to drive. I don't see the I-85 corridor ever being realized both due to the extreme cost and getting access to the necessary 

land and right of ways required. I travel by train frequently on my trips to Italy, Japan and China. It is a very efficient option and one much needed 

here in the US. This would also help to relieve some of the congestion on I-85 and help to further make the GSP airport a more cost competitive 

option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like the Greenfield route of the high speed rail to be selected for possible construction. It makes the most sense to travel through one of the 

largest cities heading east out of Atlanta on the way to South and North Carolina. It would receive the most use from faculty, students, and alumni 

of the University of Georgia.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I am very excited about a potential Atlanta to Charlotte rail connection. I prefer the Greenfield corridor option due to the low travel time and middle 

cost. I dislike the Southern Crescent corridor. This option does not significantly decrease the travel time compared to driving and has a much lower 

projected ridership.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to see the alternative cooridor that includes Athens as the final, implemented plan. As a student at the University of Georgia who travels 

home frequently, the Athens-Atlanta connection would be quite beneficial for travel. I know many other students and long-term residents who 

would like to see this route chosen.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the Greenfield option sounds best - fastest travel time, not as expensive as the route along interstate 85 and connects to the GSP airport. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the Greenfield option sounds best - fastest travel time, not as expensive as the route along interstate 85 and connects to the GSP airport. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I vote for the Greenfield project, which is the fastest route from Atlanta to Charlotte. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

High speed rail is more than overdue. The greenfield line would be incredibly beneficial to alleviate the congestion seen on 316 Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I love the idea of a highspeed railway connecting Atlanta and Charlotte. I hope you choose the Greenfield line so that the railway will go through 

Athens, GA. The city could benefit greatly from the line. We often have family fly in to visit from other areas of the country and this railway would 

offer a great alternative to car or shuttle for our family to get to Athens. We as a family would also be interested in using it for transportation to and 

from Atlanta as well as other areas along the line. With the University of Georgia in Athens, there are many times throughout the year that the city's 

infrastructure is not enough for the influx of traffic. A railway stop in Athens would help transportation for student move-in and move-out, footbal 

game days, commencement, and other large-scale events as well as provide a viable alternative for commuters. Please consider the Greenfield line!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the proposal of the Greenfield line high speed train. I think it would provide a great benefit tonAthens and would be utilized extensively. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this is a great idea. I for one would be interested in a REASONABLE rate to travel to Charlotte or Atlanta that I didn't have to drive. We did it 

all the time when I lived up north between Philadelphia - New York or Washington or Boston. I also think Option 3 would be best as it is the fastest.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

Living in Midtown Atlanta and having family in South Anderson. The Greenfield option works best. It is also cheaper out of two and the economic 

growth impact it would have in Anderson would benefit my family and friends greatly. This option also stop at GSP. Sometimes it cheaper to flight 

out of GSP or Charlotte. It also gives businesses the opportunity to save money when traveling to Atlanta and Charlotte for work. I feel the Upstate 

of South Carolina would feel a huge economic impact. This would be a huge step forward for the Southeast and America.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I am very much in favor of completing this. Imagine the number of guests that could easily arrive in Atlanta, Greenville, or Charlotte for local events. 

It would also cut down on cumbersome and wasteful air travel between the two largest cities in the area. I would prefer the most expensive route, 

but the second most would work well. I think the slowest route is a non-starter given the track is owned by a shipping company that already restricts 

Amtrak to the worst possible times (I took the crescent once, it left Greenville at 1am when it was supposed to leave at midnight).

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield route looks to be the best, since it's the fastest, it has the most potential for use, and it's NOT the most expensive. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of the Greenfield line. I believe it will be most beneficial to congestion from Atlanta to Athens and the UGA community. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I encourage consideration of the Greenfield light rail corridor through Athens. It would be wonderful to be able to travel between Athens and 

Atlanta by rail.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I greatly support the Greenfield high speed rail line with a stop in Athens. This would greatly reduce cars traffic between Athens and Atlanta. 

Students would be able to travel home without cars, people would not have to drive to either airport, and it would make it FAR easier for folks 

residing northwest of Atlanta to commute to ATL for work or pleasure.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I prefer the Greenfield route. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the train from Atlanta to NC is an incredible idea. As a resident of Athens, I'd love to see the Greenville line built so that myself and my family 

could use it. We travel to Atlanta frequently and it's difficult to make the drive with a toddler while stuck in traffic. The train would allow us to travel 

as a family and not worry about traffic congestion. Additionally, this is an excellent way to reduce our carbon footprint by commuting with others.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Greenfield route because of the ease of transportation it would create for my family and my fellow Anderson residents. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the GREENFIELD LINE as the most desirable alternative for high speed rail- this would provide an efficient means of travel (especially) 

between the University of GA & Atlanta (airport or otherwise), while reducing the widely experienced traffic congestion between the two cities. It 

would seem to especially (but not exclusively) benefit two catagories of ridership, ie, UGA students (who live in Atlanta or travel from out of state), 

and the growing number of retirees (Athens being nationally recognized as a highly desirable retirement destination). Thanks for soliciting 

comments, and I appreciate your considering my input.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

The idea of a stop in Athens is an excellent one (Green line). There is existing infrastructure, coupled with the supportive culture. This would lead to 

a higher utilization rate of the proposed system, compared to the alternatives.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

Go through Athens please. Will help immensely especially for airport travel Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to have the rail through Athens. It would make it a lot easier to get to shows and doctors in Atlanta. It might also cut down on some 

traffic on 316.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

The train line should absolutely go through Athens home of UGA. Connecting Athens via rail, connecting to Atlanta would be great for our colleges. 

Keeping all of our university students connected to our university resources is vital for our future. All aboard the Bulldog Express !!!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I am very much in favor of the route that passes through Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Please choose the railway that goes through Athens. We need an Athens to Atlanta line. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield route would be fastest and best for Anderson Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing in favor of the Greenfield route for the proposed high-speed train route from Atlanta to Charlotte. Not only is this route more 

economical for the taxpayers, but it also can be constructed quicker as there is less density along the route. Pursuing this option will achieve a 

functioning route substantially sooner than the alternatives.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield line seems to offer the best option when averaging time, cost and ridership. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield Route—connecting Atlanta, Athens, Greenville, and Charlotte—is by far the best option for the train. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I am supportive of the project, regardless of which route is ultimately selected. However, in terms of diverting the maximum number of rides and 

connecting key/economically strategic Georgia geographies and assets, my strong preference is for the route that connects Atlanta-->Lawrenceville--

>Athens-->Anderson, SC.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield alternative is really the best. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Please choose the Greenfield Athens high speed route! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I prefer the Greenfield Route due to speed, and new tracks. I have worked as a railroad conductor with CSX Transportation, and our tracks in the 

United States are very bad. A high speed rail would need a dedicated track in good condition. Additionally, this route includes the GSP Airport.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Please build the Greenfield high-speed rail route Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I really like the Greenfield route that is proposed. Living south of Anderson, it’d be nice to have an option to ride a train to Atlanta or Charlotte for a 

day trip or to attend events I would otherwise avoid because of traffic.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I'm strongly in favor of connecting our region with the Greenfield ROW option. While I don't benefit directly from a rail connection with this route, 

it's clearly the best long term strategy for giving our region flexibility to adapt to changing needs in the future. Unlike the Crescent or I-85 ROWs, 

the "Greenfield" option is a unique opportunity to offer businesses, community members, and visitors alike a one-of-a-kind mobility option across 

the entirety of the US. The northeast corridor is too dense to consider new low-curvature rail lines. We should reserve the Greenfield ROW before 

we face the same problem in the southeast. Even if we operate slower trains on the rails - or if we do not immediately build a rail line - the 

reservation of the Greenfield ROW raises the likelihood of being able to take advantage of future high speed technologies such as magnetic 

levitation (maglev) or vactrains like the hyperloop. These options may be generations away but prudent planning now will ensure that our region 

can consider such options when they have been proven elsewhere and made commercially viable.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support the Greenfield route, not only because it would connect Atlanta and Athens, but also because the review documents show that 

route to take the most cars off the road.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield option seems the most appropriate for all considerations. Other options are either too long or too expensive. Greenfield most closely 

replicates the conditions under which other successful high-speed rail services operate.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

The college kids believe a train to Atlanta and Charlotte will help with people wanting to keep the Athens lifestyle while working in Atlanta and/or 

Charlotte

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

As an Athens, GA resident, I support the Greenfield high speed rail line. This will reduce congestion in Atlanta, Athens, and the I85 corridor. 

Additionally, it will provide wonderful economic opportunities to Athens and Atlanta residents do the increase in affordable and efficient 

transportation. Although it will likely not be so sole solution to Atlanta traffic issues, this will provide a viable solution to take a significant amount of 

cars off the roads and provide reliable travel times between destinations.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Think the Greenfield option to be the best. We have and still do use the Crescent line. Having a more direct and faster option would be nice. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of the Greenfield line. Considering overall cost and estimated revenue generated, the Greenfield line offers the best compromise. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

SCC offers very little; therefore a waste of money. I-85C is a plus for Greenville,SC ,but at a tremendous expense. GC saves the most time, capital 

costs are about 1/2 of I-85, would require Greenville to build a connector.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield route seems to be the best option. Go for it! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Concerning high speed rail options, I support option 3, the Greenfield route. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I think a train from Charlotte to Atlanta is an excellent idea. The Greenfield Corridor Alternative seems the best idea because it is faster, uses 

electricity, cheaper, and goes through Athens. Athens would provide a huge base of people willing to ride the train. This corridor will also still go 

through Metro Atlanta, Gwinnett county, etc. like the other corridors.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 
10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

It seems to me that the Greenfield option is by far the best. It runs at a surplus, has a positive benefit to cost ratio, is the quickest, and generally has 

the least impact (for the most part) in many areas. It's also not the most expensive, and based on the surplus could eventually (by a very, very rough 

estimate, about 6 decades) fully cover the original capitol costs. There is little to no chance, in my opinion, that the South Crescent corridor plan 

would ever be accepted by the constituents in these states. Running a deficit and requiring public subsidy for a rail line is very much not an idea I 

see the generally tax-averse, conservative people of these states to appreciate. In addition, the projected travel times are not significantly different 

than highway travel times which means there would be very low appeal. The I-85 running a surplus could make it acceptable, although a negative 

benefit to cost ratio isn't promising either. I will say that running to Greenville proper rather than GSP is a fair benefit, however, since there is 

currently limited to no easy option getting from GSP to Greenville. I see the I-85 and Greenfield options as the only viable ones with Greenfield 

preferred to I-85.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield alternative appears to be most reasonable alternative when both speed and cost are factored in. Please take this alternative into serious 

consideration.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Allowing high speed rail to have stops in major university areas such as Athens and Anderson/Clemson as viewed in route proposal 3 increases 

desirability on both sides of the border and would decrease highway overcrowding during peak seasons. Southern railways deserve a return to 

greatness and can be an example to the industry of how to create economically impactful and environmentally conscious interstate transportation.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

The greenfield corridor sounds great. Would love to see this kind of project happen. I think the fastest route is needed in order to compete with 

airplanes and driving in general. If the train takes longer than either, than it doesn't attract as much interest from the public. I would totally ride it 

for a weekend it Charlotte or greenville. It would be a great economic boost for those areas including in atlanta!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield makes the most sense in terms of speed and safety. It also opens up new areas of economic development along the path. Anderson 

needs to be included as a stop because the county has the most international investment of any county in South Carolina with 52 companies 

representing 18 countries.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

If the premise is for passenger transportation, the Greenfield Corridor would undoubtedly be the most impactful. This is definitely needed, long 

awaited, and would have major positive impacts on local industry and the general workforce. I am looking forward to learning more specific 

information regarding the environmental comparison impacts of the alternatives.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the proposed Greenfield line that would pass through Athens. Having a high speed railway that connects Athens to Atlanta would be a 

game-changer for students who originate from the Metro ATL area as well as reducing traffic on the roads as people flood to Athens for game days.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

For my family the 3rd option from Charlotte to Atlanta would be the best. It would allow my husband and I to see family in Greenville within 30-

45mins vs sometimes nearly a 4hr commute depending on traffic (on a good day 2hr commute) it would also open up opportunities to visit Atlanta 

more frequently for the mlb games and other entertainment activities that atl has that Charlotte doesn’t.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to have the train come through Athens. I'd appreciate a safer, more environmentally friendly way to get into Atlanta and to visit my 

husband's army buddy in Charlotte.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I think they Atlanta-Charlotte railway should run through Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Greenfield option that runs through Athens Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe the Greenfield Corridor is the most efficient and cost effective plan. It allows access to populations south of Athens, including where I live, 

in Augusta.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I prefer the 3rd option, the Greenfield route. Stopping at GSP seems like a great option and I don’t believe the route needs a stop in downtown 

Greenville. It’s only a 15 min car or Uber/Lyft ride from GSP to downtown Greenville.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I think including Athens, and the University of Georgia would bring more riders and benefit more people. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I think having the rail line between Atlanta and Charlotte is a fantastic idea. Additionally, I think it should include the stop in Athens. As a UGA 

student who is from Charlotte this would more getting home much easier, and I believe this would be the same for students from Atlanta who are 

without their own transportation.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Please use the corridor through Athens Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Optio 3 with 2 stops in SC at Greenville/Spartanburg Airport & Anderson bc it is the FASTEST w/ most riders. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Greenfield option. It would be wonderful to connect athens and uga to Atlanta and surrounding areas. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Atlanta - Charlotte high speed rail line should run through Athens, in my opinion. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I like the idea. I believe the Greenfield corridor would be the best and most used. There would likely be a lot of travel between Athens and Atlanta 

and the connection between UGA and Atlanta colleges would be great.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield route through ATHENS, GA PLEASE!!!!!!!!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I'm so excited about the Greenfield option that would go through Athens. We're set up for it! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to state my support of the proposed Greenfield option for this project. While not the lowest cost option, the fact that it is currently the 

fastest option from end to end makes it more likely that it would be the top choice among transit options (train, driving, flying) to get from Atlanta 

to Charlotte, probably paying for itself considerably more quickly than the Crescent option could.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

The corridor that takes the train through Athens is the most financially sound option. Not only is ridership estimated to be the highest, but it will 

greatly reduce football-related traffic, make it easier for students and faculty to get to both the ATL and GSP airports, and will enable more dualcareer families to have one person working at UGA and one person in the ATL area, while keeping their cars off the roads. I commuted for one year 

from Athens to just inside the Atlanta perimeter and it was a nightmare: a normally one-hour commute between my home and office was always 2 

hours at rush hour, and even leaving at 5:00 a.m. (or on the reverse, at 3 or 3:30) did not help. Connections between UGA and Emory, Georgia Tech, 

Georgia State, and CDC will be easier, enabling more scientific and scholarly collaboration. Additionally, Athens-Clarke is one of the poorest counties 

in the state and in the nation, and a rail line could promote significant job growth and economic development. Athens will embrace high speed rail 

in a way that other cities on the alternative routes may not do as enthusiastically. PLEASE consider Athens your top choice.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I highly recommend the route coming through Athens! This is only going to help the student population and the community to be more efficiently 

connected to metro Atlanta and the ATL Airport, and all points north.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I vote for the Greenfield Corridor. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield route through Athens Georgia would make the most sense serving the large collegiate and related work population of the university 

which desperately needs better access to Atlanta, the airport and beyond..

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I would prefer the Greenfield corridor. The towns along the other routes parallel I-85. The Greenfield route would service more areas in need of 

transportation. Also traffic between Athens and Atlanta should be reduced if there is an alternative and take some stress off of Hwy 78 and 29.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

In support of the Greenfield Corridor Route Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I highly support the Greenfield Corridor line. If something like that existed now, it would cut down so much travel time for me and so many I know. I 

used to go to school in Athens and have an internship in Atlanta, driving the route back and forth 8 times a week - and I know many UGA students 

do the same. Choosing the rail line that provides a route between Atlanta and Athens would provide incredible environmental and economic effects. 

Now living in Atlanta and traveling to Charlotte frequently by plane, I see so many applications for this and am incredibly excited by the potential.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

A route connecting Athens to ATL airport is imperative. Either the greenfield or an alternative route that includes a stop in Athens would provide 

enormous improvements for travel for those in and around Athens.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

It would be nice to have High speed rail in Athens. It would help with alot of traffic going to and from Atlanta especially. It would also be nice to 

jump on a train and travel to Charlotte.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

The line should run through Athens. This is the best long term route and serves a highly mobile university community who have need for and would 

use the service.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of the Greenfield route through Athens because it is the fastest route, which will incentive people to use it instead of I-85, helping 

reduce the traffic problem in Atlanta. Also, for the thousands of students who attend the Univesity of Georgia from metro Atlanta, 316 is in 

desperate need of renovation. This rail line would offer that in a creative solution that would benefit the city of Athens as well.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I would absolutely love to see high speed rail between Athens, GA and Atlanta, GA. I have heard nothing but positive discussion about this option 

from residents of both Athens and Atlanta.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Go big or go home. The Greenfield route has the best usage potential, while being least disruptive to existing rail and interstates while it's built. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I just came across a news article about the proposed high-speed rail between Atlanta and Charlotte. As an Atlanta metro resident, originally from 

New York City, I'm in support of the proposal. I'm also a big supporter of the Atlanta United Major League Soccer team, and rumor has it Charlotte 

will be joining the league in the 2-3 years. I could see taking the high-speed rail to matches. I like the idea of stops in Athens (because it's home to 

the University of Georgia) and Greenville, for daytripping. A Doraville station would be closest to my home.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

The "Greenfield" Option is clearly the preferred option in this reviewer's professional opinion. It is the most cost effective option for limiting 

construction under traffic and traffic interruption, tailoring routing details to landform (grade separations), alignments for regional access strategies, 

alignments and super elevations for the accommodation of speed and rural corridor land costs.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Please seriously consider including Athens in the railpath. There is so much that could be accomplished between Atlanta and Athens if the car traffic 

congestion did not exist.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Please make Athens a stop! It would be of huge economic benefit to the town as well as make a dramatic environmental impact. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Very excited and hopeful that the greenfield cooridor connects Athens to other hubs. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I think it would be wonderful to have a high speed rail that went through Athens and connected it to Atlanta and Charlotte. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing to strongly encourage you to pick Greenfield route for the Charlotte to Atlanta proposed rail-line. Come on! It's time. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

The high speed railway is important to the Athens’ residents, especially the UGA has a big network with the Atlanta Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe the route through Athens would be of a greater service for a majority in the area. Hope this would help the traffic issues on 316 and 85. 

While also being the cheapest of the proposed routes.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Very much in favor of the "Greenfield" line running through Athens- worth the extra cost as it will have higher ridership and speeds Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Really would love a high-speed option like the greenfield corridor. It appears that removing the stop at the GSP airport would allow the trip to be 

done faster by straightening out the route. That might be a good tradeoff to make. Really looking forward to this happening!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

In favor of the Greenfield Corridor. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of high speed transportation between Athens and Atlanta. Think of the ridership between Atlanta and Athens for football weekends. It 

would be tremendous and probably pay for the project much more quickly. Also, it’s the fastest speed option and does not Have the highest price 

tag. Alternatively, I would not be opposed to doing a hybrid of these designs that would include an Athens spur or if one of the other options is 

selected, having an optional route dipping down to Athens then back up to the primary route. Athens is lacking a good road between it and 

Atlanta. Hwy 316 is the very bane of my existence and is all around AWFUL. I mean seriously, holy shit it is bad. Catch one redlight on the way to 

Atlanta and then you catch them all. It’s embarrassing knowing that most of the opposing SEC fan bases have to deal with that. I’m sure a bunch of 

opposing fans would be happy to stay in Atlanta and train over for the “gameday express” or whatever you’d like to call it. Athens already has 

infastructure in place from the multimodal center to handle it. Bottom line- include Athens and watch the payoff time be cut down substantially.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe the Atlanta to Charlotte train via Athens would see a large number of passengers riding for business (Travel thru Atlanta Hartsfield Airport, 

potential for career opportunities in all connected cities since travel time is short) as well as pleasure (Vacation travel thru Atlanta Hartsfield, UGA 

football games, arts and theater, tourism in all connected cities), therefore this route has my vote for the best rail line option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I prefer the Greenfield route because I think there will be a fair number of students riding through Athens and the cheaper price is obviously a plus. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Rail has long been needed to connect Atlanta with nearby cities. Public transportation in the form of high speed rail creates connectivity and 

accessibility that is crucial with today's growing population. I am a Master of Urban Planning and Design student and have studied a lot about 

transportation planning and alternative transportation modes. I believe the Greenfield Corridor Alternative is the best option for the Atlanta to 

Charlotte rail line. It is the fastest route and in terms of price, it seems quite reasonable. It would create a much needed connection between Athens 

and Atlanta, which would allow commuters and UGA students an alternative transportation option between the two cities that could alleviate 

vehicular traffic congestion.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield route for the Atlanta Charlotte high speed railway would be excellent for many reasons! In addition to providing transportation from 

Atlanta to Charlotte it would also provide fast transportation from Athens to Atlanta which is a highly commuted trip as it is. It would also mean 

direct access from Athens to the Atlanta airport which would be excellent for people coming in to watch football games, coming in for conferences 

or just going to visit family if their out-of-state students. I currently live in Athens and work for SunTrust which is merging with BB&t for a new 

headquarters in Charlotte. Any of the proposed routes would be excellent considering a lot of the existing SunTrust employees will be staying in 

Atlanta but we'll need to commute to Charlotte. Another great thing with the Greenfield round is it will 4 college students in Athens to take 

internships in Atlanta without moving since they would now have a reasonable way to commute to and from Atlanta.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

In favor of Atlanta to Charlotte Greenfield corridor alternative Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Please consider the Greenfield corridor alternative! Athens needs a train to Atlanta desperately, plus this option is still servicing Suwanee. Make 

smart decisions now; it will pay off in the future.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this is a great idea. The greenfield line would be most effective. The need for fast reliable public transit from Athens to Atlanta is very 

necessary and would help students, faculty, and staff from the University of Georgia get to the ATL airport, or even commute from Atlanta daily, like 

a lot of students currently do by car. This would also help students living in NC and SC get home faster and without using cars. The amount of trips 

by car would be greatly reduced, which is overall great for future sustainability, moving towards a society that is less dependent on cars. There are 

many people who would rely on this system, especially those without cars.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in support of the Atlanta to Charlotte Plan. Specifically the Greenfield alternative would be the most cost effective connection between major 

cities through Northeast Georgia and South Carolina. The connection is crucial to facilitating the massive population growth towards the Southeast.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Regarding the Atlanta-Charlotte high speed rail link, I'd like to include my thoughts/comments. 1. Since the drive time from Atlanta to Charlotte is 

about 4 hours, any rail link should be significantly faster in order to attract riders. 2. Attracting high levels of ridership will be key to long-term 

success of the project. Even if the rail fails to turn a profit, as long as many people are seeing a benefit, we will continue to want to support it. 

Given those two thoughts, I recommend you reject the "Southern Crescent" option - it would be too slow. I recommend you reject the I-85 option - 

 too expensive. I recommend you approve the Greenfield option. The Greenfield option links three airports together, providing a legitimate 

alternative to air travel - or an extension of air travel plans to intermediate destinations. The Greenfield option also includes a stop in Athens, 

which I think is an outstanding idea. This will give a realistic option for college students to travel by air to either ATL, GSP or Charlotte, and use the 

train for reaching their final destination in Athens/UGA. Thank you.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the Athens stop would be a huge boost in gaining public acceptance for this project. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I prefer the Greenville route through Athens. Could be great way to get to the airport and Charlotte Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Choose the route that goes through Athens Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

A rail service to Athens GA would be very beneficial to the city and the University of Georgia. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

Although the route would be longer, I support the route through Athens, GA. It would impact a larger population of the state with multiple benefits. 

Examples include lessen traffic, higher accessibility to the University of Georgia, commuting easiness, etc.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I support Greenfield high speed railway. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support the Greenfield route. It would increase the flow of people between Atlanta and Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love to see the Greenfield option chosen. Athens needs alternative travel options to Atlanta and Greenville. Charlotte is an added bonus. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support a high speed rail line and would like to see this route come through Athens. UGA had a 6.3 billion dollar economic impact last 

year. Connecting Athens to Atlanta and Charlotte by rail would enhance the positive impact of our state's flagship University. I'm

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

Welcoming many international speakers for lectures and other initiatives at UGA, the existence of a high speed railway connecting Athens to Atlanta 

airport would immensely facilitate the organization of such events. It would be a fast, efficient, and essential way to connect the University to the 

rest of the world! Thank you.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield route would provide the highest economic benefit to the region. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

The proposed Atlanta to Charlotte railroad should pass through Athens. This would benefit the large student population of UGA from Atlanta as well 

as provide alternative environmentally friendly means of commuting.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I feel the Greenfeild route would be better I live in athens Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

This line should include Athens. Of the towns in Georgia it is most likely to have citizens that will use it. It should also be chosen because people will 

not use routes that are much quicker than driving.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this is a wonderful idea. This has the opportunity to expand out the benefits of Atlanta's economic growth to other regions within the state. 

Furthermore, as Charlotte develops into the Southern banking hub, a connection with the Southern business hub would be a great system of 

transfer. Furthermore, giving Athens better access to both of these markets could stimulate growth in the University area due to easy-transit access, 

and greater commuting options.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of the Charlotte - Atlanta train going through Athens! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

Hoping for an Athens stop on the rail line! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love the implementation of the Greenfield option for the high speed Atlanta to Charlotte train railway. It would be extremely beneficial for 

students, faculty, and visitors to the University to be able to take the train from Atlanta to Athens and bypass the traffic and be more timely and 

convenient. The limited options for travel from Athens to Atlanta has been a deterrent for many potential new faculty when they visit.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

Use Greenfield Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to see this railway happen. I especially would like to see a station somewhere between Lawrenceville and Athens. Preferable barrow 

county. 316 and 81 has massive traffic flow issues, and if there was a station there, it may decrease the traffic on the local highways

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I’m an Athens teacher and resident and would use this rail twice a month if it went through Athens. Of the three options, the Athens route makes 

the most positive impact

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I write in support of the Greenfield corridor option. To help fund it, consider adding a Mall of Georgia station and operating UGA Game Day trains. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I choose Greenfield. It is not as accessible to all as the Southern Crescent route but it will be a faster route. I do think parking at the airport needs to 

be separate from the parking for those flying and a separate building or entrance for those using the train.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I am so excited for the possibility of a high speed rail station in Athens, GA! I have lived in Athens for a decade and have no plans to leave anytime 

soon. However, my parents and a large number of friends still live in Virginia. Having a high speed rail line through Athens that connects to 

Charlotte, NC and eventually Richmond, VA would be incredibly convenient for me. I would likely take day trips to Charlotte, NC for fun as well as 

travel home to VA more frequently if I had train travel as an option. Currently I travel to Virginia twice per year, and almost never travel to 

Charlotte, NC because I do not want to put the wear and tear onto my car.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a good idea, and it would be great if the rail network goes through Athens Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

Bring high speed rail to Athens, please! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I think a railway from Atlanta to Charlotte would be a great measure for both cities and would possibly alleviate some of Atlanta’s congestion. I also 

think that the railway should have a stop in Athens as this would decrease Athens to Atlanta traffic and help students get to the airport.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

We need a railway system from Charlotte to Atlanta - even more so as our cities continue to grow. Our highways are not keeping up with useage. In 

my opinion the proposed railway will not be used unless you implement one the two fastest options. Having a railway to connect all three cities will 

benefit all air travelers providing more cost and time efficient options for each destination. The middle price option would be sufficient as there is 

easy transportation to the airport using Uber and Lyft. I would like to see the most green alternative implemented.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

The Atlanta-Charlotte line should pass through Athens!! This would provide a HUGE benefit to students and townspeople alike that desperately 

need a way to get back and forth quickly

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I’ve looked at the high speed rail options for a Vhaflitte to Atlanta corridor. I believe he Greenfield option makes the most sense. Including Athens as 

a stop is very important, as UGA draws in many visitors every year and does not have an airport that accommodates commercial flights. Thank you.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I am very supportive of a high speed rail through Athens Connecting the Atlanta airport to Charlotte. To me, this option makes the most sense as far 

as the number of riders it would benefit. There is a strong Athens/Atlanta connection with the student body of UGA and could help decrease some 

of the traffic flow between the two destinations. Personally, as a professional in Athens, this option would allow for the potential to work in Atlanta 

while still living in Athens without the brutal commute. The traffic into Athens increases dramatically during football season and it doesn’t feel like 

there is the infrastructure to support it. This option could create better safety during these times and also allow folks to come into Athens without 

having to stay for the weekend.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

Please route the high-speed rail through Athens, GA. I am a physician who commutes from Athens to Atlanta for my job at the Centers for Disease 

Control and Prevention. I have many colleagues at CDC and at Emory who do the same.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love the Greenfield option. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I’m sorry I missed the meeting, but I read about it in the Greenville News. I am in favor of increasing passenger rail options. I’ve seen it work in 

Europe, and I think we ought to make it work here. From what I read about in the paper, I favor the greenfield route that stops at GSP.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

Please let this pass through Athens. It would be great to connect UGA with the greater Atlanta community. I am a professor at UGA (I drive to work 

4 or 5 days a week) and students and faculty would like a more direct and reliable transportation option than driving to Atlanta.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I am dropping my comments on the projected corridors for the new rail system and strongly support Athens corridor. Athens is not only highly 

populated area campared with other proposed routes but also very strong and growing academic center, place of conference meetings, cultural and 

sport events that attract people from other states and local community. It would be also a relief for more congested roads that have no capacity 

comparable to I-85. The new mean of transportation is to bring alternatives and possibly stimulate other part of the state. I was born and raised in 

Europe and see a need for rail system and understand how having such alternative helps the community to grow, makes life convenient and easy, 

makes moving from point A to B efficient and cuts travel time and CO2 footprint tremendously. Currently to reach Atlanta metropolitan area or 

airport via road is a great challenge causing stress and require a lot of time. Interstate 316 and other roads with intersections do not guarantee safe 

and smootg travel. Athens has already made a lot of improvement via SPLOST and other programs to promote car alternative transportation. A new 

multimodal public transportation hub has train station read but not the access to train. I think it is in our interest to allow local community to 

benefit from cultural and business exchange. Other nations have already figured out that rail is the future with all it's convenience and saved time 

and safety. I strongly support new Athens alternative corridor that in my view will help not only two different metropolitan areas to connect but also 

serve as an important bridge to improve the life of strategic communities in state and help the metropolitan areas to benefit from Athens great 

potential offered in science, business and culture and great community of Athens.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I think running through Athens would be very beneficial to this project because alot of people travel that route frequently. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield Route connecting athens sounds fantastic! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

This train should go through Athens! It would generate more revenue than the other routes because of the thousands of students going to and from 

Athens and Atlanta and the Atlanta Airport on a regular basis. And on UGA game days it would be absolutely fantastic. Our family has a small 

business in Athens and we use the Airport frequently. Creating a quick and easy way to get from the countryside to the airport would encourage 

business expansion into this very affordable area. It’s an idea that’s overdue!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

Please push for the Greenfield plan for the ATL-CLT railway! This would be amazing for those of us living in Athens! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

Bring the train through Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

The route through Athens looks best to me. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

Go through Athens!! It would not only benefit students but would be a huge economic boom for the eastern side of the state that’s beginning to see 

growing industry.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I am very pleased to hear that this railway fro Atlanta to Charlotte is being considered. This is a great step into the future. Athens needs to be one 

of the stops. It is a major city in the corridor.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Greenfield route as it would stop in Athens. With the large numbers of UGA students from the greater Atlanta area, this would be 

reliable stream for riders.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

Excited to see how this develops! I'm hoping the Greenfield route gets chosen! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I would prefer this railway be created to run through Athens, GA. There is a large population of citizens who commute from Athens to Atlanta for 

work, which causes 316 and 85 to be over-crowded, and dangerous. This new railway would save commuters time, frustration, increase their mental 

health, and drastically increase their safety.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

The rail system through Athens would be great for the environment by reducing traffic congestion during sporting events and the morning and 

evening commutes to and from the Atlanta area. Safety and security of traveler's and the public would also be easier to control since there would be 

easier ways of screening passengers when boarding for weapons and or drugs. The rail system would also possibly generate more revenue for the 

Athens area.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I've read the draft EIS documents. They make it clear that the Greenfield option is the most viable solution. The #1 thing currently hindering 

ridership of trains in the USA is speed, trailed by availability (whether geographic or time). If a train can get tot Charlotte in 2 hours, that makes it an 

incredibly compelling option for business travel. At 5 hours, it's a non-starter.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the route through Athens makes the most sense. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I think that the option which would use completely new ROW would be best for this project. It will be more competitive with both modes of 

transportation, it will offer very high speeds, and it will allow you to travel between the two cities of Charlotte and Atlanta in about 2 hours. If this 

option is selected, it would cost more to build, but it would generate a huge profit in the long run, when people will decide to use the train instead 

of being stuck in a traffic jam, or going through the hassles of the airport. Trains are a proven mode of transportation, they’ve helped connect cities 

together, and they are much more comfortable than cars or airplanes. High speed rail has worked overseas in Europe, China, Japan, and other 

countries, as well as what we have here in the northeast region. By adopting this mode of transportation here in this country, more people will want 

to take the train, especially knowing that they can get between cities in less time than it would take being in the car or on the plane. We need high 

speed rail across our country, I am glad to hear that we’re taking initiative to do these kind of things for the future to come.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love the rail to come through Athens. The Athens route seems to make the most since logistically, cost wise, and also for tourism. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I fully support making the Greenfield line Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

Please consider the Greenfield option for the high speed rail from Charlotte NC to Atlanta. We need the transportation connectivity in Athens 

desperately.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support a line that includes a stop in Athens. Rail service from Athens to Atlanta is long overdue. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes, yes, yes!!!!! Please build a high speed rail line from Charlotte to Atlanta, with a stop in Athens!! What a wonderful idea!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

Definitely choose a route through Athens, GA. This would benefit students tremendously, and make our highways safer by reducing vehicle traffic 

from Atlanta to Athens along I85 and GA416. UGA is the state's premier public institution of higher education. Let's enable its success by providing a 

high speed rail transit option!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the route that goes through Athens Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I spend a lot of time in France and Italy, in part because I can take trains between cities. Traffic makes driving too difficult for an older person and 

flying is a pain. Athens is a retirement destination, as well as a university town, and the train under consideration would be a great asset. I would 

take it frequently.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

Please select the route through Athens! It would be a HUGE boost to the entire N Georgia economy and bring a form of the long-proposed "Brain 

Train" - connecting UGA with universities in Atlanta and boosting the whole region.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I’m in favor of the Greenfield route as I believe it could greatly decrease traffic congestion by providing an alternative travel option between Athens 

and Atlanta.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I want the Greenfield route for the Atlanta to Charlotte railway because of the stop in Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love a high speed rail. Especially going through Athens, the Greenfield line option. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

As a current Atlanta resident and former resident along the Northeast Corridor, I am a strong proponent of increased high speed rail connectivity 

and improved dedicated high-speed infrastructure. I strongly favor the Greenfield alternative. It is imperative that we build dedicated high-speed 

rail infrastructure presently, before further development makes land acquisition difficult and costly. The greenfield route provides significant 

opportunities for further growth and higher operating speeds.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

The route should go through Athens to unite Atlanta with the University of Georgia. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I think a high speed train through Athens would be great! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

In general, I think this is a great idea! I am excited by the possibility of using this means of transportation. In reviewing the documents and 

weighing benefits and risks, I would vote for the Greenfield Corridor option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

Please include Athens Ga in the Atlanta to Charlotte railway. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

The green trail that goes by all three airports as well as Athens makes the most sense to me. The trail that follows 85 makes the least sense as there 

are few cities along the way that have populations to support it, as well as citizens along the way that would be likely to go to the other cities on the 

rail. There is tremendous traffic between Athens and Atlanta (especially the airport) and it is likely cheaper to build a rail than support a larger 

airport and flights to and from Athens.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

Prefer southernmost route Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield site seems the best long term plan as it touches the most people Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I think that the best route would be the Greenfield line with a suwannee/doraville approach. This seems to be the best overall option. The crescent 

route is worthless; it is far too slow to be competitive and amtrak already services what little demand there is for that. The I85 route, while an 

acceptable speed, is far too expensive to see a positive return on investment for the region during the life of the project. The greenfield route boasts 

the best numbers and that high speed would be a literal game changer, opening up the entire region for much more investment. I think ideally the 

route goes from downtown, up to Doraville and Suwanee before cutting over and going to Athens. I think a stop closer to Anderson would be good 

and then hitting up the GSP airport before possibly heading onward. I don't have the knowledge to comment on the Charlotte approach 

appropriately. Please let me know how I can help support this project happening regardless of the route.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

It should go through Athens Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the greenfield path is by far the best alternative. 1)it allows for redundancy and complementarity in the travel corridor. Frieght/commuter on 

the crescent. Cars on 85 and HSR greenfield. 2) it allows construction of a true HSR corridor. The crescent fix is helpful, but using it will still be more 

expensive and take longer than driving. It would be 2 billion invested with possibly no obvious benefits in transit numbers. 3) building on 85 would 

not only be expensive now but would increase any future project on the 85 corridor. What a mess! 4) the greenfield route allows for far more future 

benefits. The routing to the south to athens allows for a much shorter link to augusta and thus to savannah, columbia, and charleston. While the 

upfront cost is greater than the crescent route, it would allow for a real transit network in ways that the crescent would not. In sum, the 85 project 

is a headache, the crescent would be only minimally beneficial to passenger traffic and probably only for commuters, while the greenfield is truly 

transformative of the region.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Definitely want and will pay increased taxes to pay for any fast speed rails from Athens to Atlanta. Connect to bus service to move around Atlanta Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the Greenfield corridor would be ideal because it would like UGA and state botanical gardens to ATL and reduce traffic in 316, 85, and 20. 

And because I live in Athens! Electric, 220 mph! OMG!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

 Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Greenfield Corridor. We need a 'high speed limited stop' rail to support the southeast. Additional regional rail development should 

plan to connect to the 'high speed limited stop' stations.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

With 2 of the proposed routes having similar cost, it makes more sense to select the one with highest potential ridership, which would bring in more 

revenue. I understand that is the one going through Athens. The one going through Toccoa and Gainesville is the least costly, but also much slower 

and less projected ridership, and will become obsolete much sooner, meaning potentially more cost overall in the same period of time to bring up to 

date. My vote is for the Athens route. Of the three routes, it is more central to more people.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to see the third option of a new corridor ($6.2 - $8.4 billion) for fast rail from Charlotte to Atlanta. Would also like to see fast rail using 

same tracks from Greenville/Spartanburg/Anderson to/from Atlanta and Charlotte. If this is not in the plan, it needs to be added.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield provides the greatest benefit and should be chosen as the corridor. Also, I think Tucker is a fantastic location for a stop. The Northlake 

Retail District is emerging as a multi-modal transportation hub, including MARTA bus service with a potential transfer station, multi-use trails, 

proposed Bus Rapid Transit station, potential stop for GRTA express buses, etc. A high-speed rail station would be an excellent addition for 

improving connectivity in the area and connecting riders into other transportation modes.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I’d love to see high speed rail from Athens south to Atlanta and to the north to New York, Boston, and points in between. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

An important part of the Purpose for the Atlanta-Charlotte project is its role as a key part of the Southeast Corridor to Washington DC, conncting there to the 

Northeast Corridor. The optimum operating plan, including whether trips through to DC will require a change of trains, will be made in later stages of the 

Project Development process. 
10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield line would be extremely beneficial in lightening traffic north and east of Atlanta. I also like the idea of a brand new system and rail 

that takes advantage of today's planning technology. The red line is in overcrowded areas and in my opinion that would just add more crowding. 

Cars would still be traveling to the rail stations and parking would be a nightmare. The Greenfield line would give some relief instead of adding more 

congestion. The blueline, once past Suwanee, does not benefit enough of the population. It's too far west and spends wasted miles, and time, in 

low population/rural areas. Thanks for the opportunity to comment.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe high-speed rail -- or any passenger rail -- through northeast Georgia is essential, especially if it runs through Athens, which would be a boon 

to students, academics, football fans, and the broader community in general. It would turn the greater Atlanta area into something similar to the 

Research Triangle of Raleigh, Durham, and Chapel Hill in North Carolina. Yet, no matter what route is ultimately chosen, public investment in 

passenger railroads is a must for the Atlanta area. Demographic trends indicate that the Atlanta area will see a massive population increase. Traffic 

conditions are already problematic and the roads cannot handle much more of an increase in the number of cars.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Let's do the trains in Athens Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Send the train through Athens Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

As a frequent train passenger, I favor the Greenfield Corridor through Athens, which offers the highest speeds—125 miles per hour for diesel or 220 

mph for electric—as well as the highest potential ridership, carrying up to 6.3 million people in 2050. The Interstate 85 Corridor would have similar 

speeds and ridership, but at a much higher cost of $13.3 billion to $16.4 billion, compared to $6.2 billion to $8.4 billion for the Greenfield Corridor. 

Though the Southern Crescent Corridor would be much cheaper at $2 billion to $2.3 billion to upgrade those tracks, it would also top out at 79 mph 

for diesel and 110 mph for electric, and carry far fewer people, about 940,000 to 1.1 million in 2050. In terms of increasing cost effectiveness and 

ridership, I urge the selection of the Greenfield Corridor.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

 Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

i like the Greenfield route Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I think high speed rail for this corridor is an excellent idea. I prefer the greenfield alternative due to the low travel times. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Great opportunity for future growth in the area. I would go with a greenfield connecting Athens in the loop. We can add Gainesville later with the 

existing track.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

This should go through Athens to capture that large Atlanta commuting population Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support a rail line connecting Athens and the University of Georgia to Atlanta and Charlotte. It would improve the lives in the region and 

stimulate economic growth and exchange of ideas.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Please consider the green route for this high speed link through Athens. It can improve Athens to Atlanta traffic and provide a better alternative to 

driving. I am for it!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Seems to be much concern with impeding on private property with the greenline option. To me it seems like the best one. I live near the area that 

this rail will affect and I’m not mad about it! Having a Stop near GSP will be awesome and I for sure would use it to go to ATL.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield seems to be the best option since it’s the middle of the road. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield project with an electric train is able to complete the trip in just over two hours. That would be a game-changer for me and my wife. 

We have family in Atlanta, but the 3.5-4 hour drive is so long to visit them often. The slower the proposed plan, the more unlikely we would be to 

use it, since a 3 hour train ride is comparable to driving. I know my company would also love to have the highest speed line, because it means we 

could interview GT and UGA grads much easier. My only asks are for it to be faster (>220 mph) and for it to be built as soon as possible.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Okay here is the best option: The green line, because that connects all three airport hubs, is far enough away from I-85 so if a train derails it will not 

crash onto the highway, and the new track can be designed specifically for high speed travel to a top speed of 125 MPH. NO slower speed is 

acceptable because people on I-85 travel at least 80 MPH on the highway and ignore the 60 MPH speed limit signs, so no benefit in making this train 

slow. Finally, the train should be a "Siemens ES 64 U2" (will need to be changed for 60 Hertz use) electric train. This train tops out at 140 MPH and 

has a well proven safety track record as it is used quite a bit in Germany for their passenger trains.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

As much as we would all like to minimize costs, the long term solution that minimizes environmental impact, serves the most people, and sports the 

most efficiency has to be the best choice. I would say that the Greenfields choice might be the best of all worlds.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I prefer the fastest route. I believe this route will be used the most. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

It is embarrassing that we do not have good public transportation alternatives to the interstates. I support fully the Greenfield Corridor as it costs 

less and provides about the same benefits as the I-85 alternative. Unfortunately, I could not attend your open house meeting in Greenville as I was 

stuck on I-85 coming home from Charlotte. I could have easily gotten back in time if there had been a one hour train.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I travel to Greenville, Charlotte and Atlanta airports frequently. The travel time is often very long and frustrating due to the construction on the 

interstates. I would use the rail option frequently. I believe the best option is Greenfield Corridor.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to voice my support for the Greenfield Corridor option. The speed for the Southern Crescent wil prevent it from being utilized, despite 

the smaller impact on the budget. I-85 and Greenfield are nearly matched on travel time, but the Greenfield Corridor wil serve more people at a 

much lower cost. I would ask you to keep in mind the potential growth of ridership. The younger generation are more likely to rely on public transit 

in the future, or at least use it frequently. A line that would serve the Athens area would make a greater impact, but would also serve as a good 

example for the rest of the country. Athens is rapidly growing, as are the surrounding areas, but much of that route remains undeveloped and could 

be a great option to prevent displacing many people and businesses.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield through Athens, please! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I feel if we're going to make this investment, then let's get the fastest route possible. This is why I think the Greenfield route is the best option. I 

think we have to incentivize train transportation, and the best way to do that is to make a trip to Atlanta faster than it is by car.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Greenfield route for the Southeast High Speed Rail Corridor project if it will have a stop in Athens, GA. Please bring rail to Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

The route connecting Atlanta and Charlotte via Athens would solve about 90% of the transportation challenges experienced by individuals between 

the ages of 18 and 35 in the southeast. Annual ridership would be through the roof

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Please look at a mixed use path when/if the greenfield option is picked. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield option is my choice Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Prefer the Greenfield corridor for cost and speed. Environmental impact is ok also. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I wold like to show my support for the railway and suggest the Greenfield corridor route. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Greenfield alternative as the capital cost seems viable and the travel time is cut in half. We visited China recently and rode their bullet 

trains--fantastic. Why can't we have the same of better transportation technology? We're falling behind.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing becuase on my neighborhoods facebook page/ nextdoor there is a lot of NIMBYism against the Greenfield corridor. After reviewing the 

corridor, it looks to be by far the best corridor, going from GSP airport to CLT or ATL without catching a flight, I think it will be the best from a public 

transport perspective. I will say though there are people on our neighborhoods facebook and nextdoor asking people to put negative comments 

about the greenfield survey on here... there may be an influx of people trying to skew the survey sample

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I woul prefer and would definitely use the Greenfield option, particularly for GVL to Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

As someone that will be directly affected by the planned Alt #3 (rail construction would be less than a mile from our residence), I still see it as being 

the only worth while option to pursue. If we are going to do high speed rail (internationally recognized as 300 kph+), our effort should be the one 

option that has the foresight for true high speed rail speeds / time reductions between locations. If Alt #3 is not selected, air travel will continue to 

dominate this travel route. Especially when you consider the potential links to other east coast high speed rail networks. We don't want to be the 

"speed bump" in the whole system 25 years from now.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Very much in favor of a hi-speed rail line between Atlanta and Charlotte and would use multiple times a month. The cost and speed combination for 

Greenfield makes it look like the best alternative and the added bonus of getting folks from Atlanta to Athens would be attractive to UGA alumni.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Please make this happen. Is prefer the southern route but will take any of these options. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

This project is sorely needed as an alternative to car and air travel between Charlotte & Atlanta. We have long needed an alternative travel method 

such as that in the Northeast between Washington, DC, and New York City. I am 100% in favor of this project & prefer the 'Greenfield' alternative 

with a stop in Greenville, SC .

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Just wanting to voice support for this project, it would make access from Athens to Atlanta much faster and easier, especially to the airport, at this 

point there are no convenient or fast options to get to the airport other than limited shuttle services or driving. The ability to connect to other 

services to Charlotte and beyond is also appealing.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Let me first take the opportunity to express my gratitude, relief and general excitement for this project. High speed rail is sorely needed in this 

country. Politically speaking, this should be a bipartisan issue for which support should be overwhelming. The historical barriers that have kept this 

nation from such transformative transportation infrastructure are embarrassing to say the least. So, it’s certainly worth noting at the outset that I 

strongly support this project as well as the larger Southeast High-Speed Rail Corridor. After reviewing the three retained alternatives, I would like to 

share some simple, and perhaps obvious thoughts from the 30,000-foot view. I believe the Greenfield alternative is the way to move forward. The 

capital costs are medium range (comparatively) and it produces the highest speeds, most frequent trips and highest revenue projected in 2050. I 

think the overall effectiveness of the project is conditioned on these qualities. The option with the highest cost/ benefit analysis should win the day 

here. I believe the least viable option is the I-85 alternative. The capital cost is the greatest for a slower speed and less frequent trips than other 

alternatives considered. Similarly, the Southern Crescent alternative is problematic in self-defeating ways. The benefit/ cost ratio is the lowest of 

the three and it is the slowest speed of the three. Also, relying solely on diesel technology as we look toward the future seems undermining and 

short-sighted.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

For nearly 20 years citizens have voiced their opinions about the need for mass transit to Athens in order to link the University of Georgia with the 

professional working resources the city of Atlanta provides. The Greenfield route could make this dream a reality.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield Route should be chosen due to: the quickest travel time between Atlanta and Charlotte which is the primary benefit of the HSR 

concept; the capital cost is cheaper than the I-85 corridor; ridership success will pay for the ongoing maintenance of the project; current freight rail 

will not be impacted on the Greenfield route; Greenfield has the highest ridership than the other routes; the line does not have to be retrofitted 

into the built environment compared to the other two routes; GSP is on the route which is a necessity for an effective transportation link; current 

infrastructure is not in place in Greenville or Spartanburg city centers to handle the influx of passengers coming in to access a HSR station which 

means these communities (taxpayers) will have to pay for these additional improvements which are not built into your cost estimates - a GSP 

station has the space and ability to handle additional passengers; the future high growth areas of the Upstate are south of I-85 and the Greenfield 

Route would be more accessible to the populations of 2050; Greenfield has less stations which means fewer stops and faster route times; Greenfield 

will spur economic development in a future high growth area of the southern Upstate. Using the NS line with its many grade crossings (ie downtown 

Easley) would result in more train/auto collisions and delay the service between Atlanta and Charlotte. Using the I-85 corridor would also increase 

traffic congestion and impact safety as drivers would be distracted by the HSR train on the side of the interstate or within the median (not to 

mention the years of construction along the interstate to construct the project); when there is an accident on the side of the interstate, drivers are 

distracted looking at the wreck rather than focusing on the road. The Greenfield Route with its own designated route away from shared freight rail 

service is the best option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield option is the best option when looking at speed vs cost and the best benefit for the community. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I read about this on the day after the Greenville open house. I travel to Atlanta and Charlotte quite often and the number of semis and accidents on 

I85 is frightening. I believe the environmental impact alone not to mention the convenience would be worth pursuing this rail system. I like the 

fastest route that goes through Greenville but any of the plans would be excellant.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield Corridor through Athens is the best option! We have needed this for YEARS! Connect UGA to Atlanta and Charlotte... so many people 

are traveling back and forth by car daily. We need this!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

The railway would be great to bring through Athens, Georgia. There are thousands of internship and other opportunities in Atlanta that students 

and recently graduated college students could take advantage of if there was convenient transportation to Atlanta. This would also boost out-ofstate attendance to UGA through convenient transportation to and from North Carolina. Further, connection to two international airports is 

advantageous for everyone living in north Georgia, because it would alleviate individual car travel to Atlanta for the airport and allow Athens, 

Lawrenceville, and even nearby county residents to ride the railway instead. The eventual addition of the railway to D.C. would also be most 

beneficial to Athens' residents. Regardless of which path the railway ends up taking, it should be implemented as soon as possible to provide 

alternative means of transportation to north Georgia residents.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield project looks like a great way to get from GSP to ATL or CLT Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of the proposed Greenfield route. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a FANTASTIC idea!!! We need this desperately, especially connecting through Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I hope that serious consideration will be given towards the high speed rail option or Greenfield corridor for the Charlotte/Atlanta rail. Not only 

would this be a boon for business between the 2 cities, but also take a large portion of traffic off the roads and reduce congestion.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Do the fast route but bring the route into Greenville. Serve the people the people in the cities with rail service and take the freight out of the cities. I 

suggest a hybrid route of the Greenfield route but have it service Anderson and Greenville, preferably downtown. If I have to take a shuttle to a 

station, I might as well go to the airport. Work with the rail companies to give them something they want. A whole new corridor like the Greenfield 

could help freight and passenger service.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in support of the Greenfield option Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Go big or go home. I support the Greenfield line. Yes, it is the most expensive, but it has the potential to move the greatest number of people. I 

would make the trip to Atlanta much more frequently were this an option for travel. I have family in Greenville, SC, and the drive on 85 has grown 

increasingly crowded, long, and frustrating. My mother, a senior citizen, lives here in Charlotte, and she cannot drive anymore. She would be able to 

utilize this form of transportation to see her family in Greenville.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

The route thru Greenville-Spartanburg airport would seem the best for travelers and have easy access to downtown via shuttles if needed. This 

would make it a transportation hub and be in a safe accessible area.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I support this project. I think it's important the route goes through Athens and Greenville, in order to attract riders. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

As a resident of a town lying along the Athens corridor to Charlotte, I strongly support building the high speed line there. Assuming that it would be 

able to stop in Athens, there would finally be an easy way to travel between our state's major university city and its capitol, and I believe this route 

would see a lot of ridership, especially if it were to have stops in Lawrenceville and perhaps another North Carolina city before Charlotte. I know you 

will likely receive lots of negative comments from others who live in my area who are afraid of progress and modernity, but I want you to know that 

we don't all feel that way. The Athens route offers the best combination of cost and ridership of the three--that's the smart choice.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Please strongly consider the Greenfield route. In addition to providing better connections between major Georgia Cities it allows for the best speed 

at a reasonable middle of the road cost.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Please choose the Greenfield corridor, it serves the most people and will be the best investment, creating a better link between significant areas in 

the state. I-85 is so bad to drive

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I am all for a passenger train rail being built to connect Athens to neighboring larger cities. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

In favor of high speed rail. Just used it in Japan and it is wonderful. I hope people on this committee have been there to experience it. I favor the 

Greenfield option. Surrounding land around GSP might be used for a park and ride for people departing the Greenville area. The Southern option 

using existing rail line would, to me, be a mistake. Old line can cause problems. I-85 is good but seems to be the least feasible because of existing 

land use

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

High speed rail from Atlanta to Charlotte, eventually linking up with planned DC extension, is a great idea and one big government project that I 

would enthusiastically support. The I85 corridor is an unpleasant drive and I frequently prefer taking I-20 (out of the way, but more pleasant) back 

to my childhood home in NC. I also have family in Northern VA. I would prefer taking high speed rail from ATL, Athens or Greenville to Charlotte, 

Greensboro, Raleigh or DC as my current travel time to IAD is approximately 6 hrs given my drive to Hartsfield, parking, security, baggage etc. I have 

lived in Europe and it is much easier to work on the train than at the airport. Make this project happen- with a stop in Athens!-and don't let us fall 

behind the Chinese.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I really like the Greenfield Corridor route because more people would ride coming and going from Athens and Anderson as well as the airport. 

Granted, the route would cater more to airport travelers than locals, but the speed is the primary factor. I like the idea of a train going directly into 

downtown Greenville, but as a Greenville resident, I am more concerned about getting to the Charlotte or Atlanta city centers than having access to 

my own city's downtown.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Please bring this to Athens...well use it Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

If built, hope it follows the I-85 corridor, which would impact private landowners the least. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

EVERYONE PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO FILL OUT THIS PUBLIC COMMENT FORM: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/AtlCha19 “I am writing as an 

Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during the travel hours 

necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to have a high speed rail come through Athens!!!! I’ve lived here for over 18 years and would love to take advantage of what Atlanta 

offers and the train would make it more convenient.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the greenfield corridor option! Best cost when comparing max speeds, path, and locations/stops. Makes the most sense! (Though it would 

be nice to see an option that goes a little close to Greenville)

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes, this would be a huge incentive for me to stay in Athens, that way I can travel without always having to take a car. People could drink in 

Atlanta/Athens and be able to safely take the rail without having to pay huge Uber fees.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Athens route based on the potential rider population. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the "greenfield corridor" route through Athens for any upgrading of passenger rail service. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to voice support for the Greenfield alternative corridor. I understand this corridor to have the potential for the fastest travel time 

although at a higher costs. Now is the time for Georgia, South Carolina and North Carolina to work with the Federal government to make this high 

speed link a reality. The benefits of high speed rail are numerous, and examples can be found around the world of how increased mobility drives the 

economy. Even inside America we can see how in the North East Corridor Amtrak's higher speed and higher frequency offers drive the economic 

engine and spurs growth along the corridor. I urge GDOT to strongly consider the impacts of the high speed link, and look at the long term 

prospects. Infrastructure projects only get more difficult and more expensive over time, the longer they are put off. It is imperative to consider the 

cost benefit analysis and use the long term projected economic models to drive the decision to build the new G

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Environmental considerations will be fully 

considered in the Tier 2 study.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

1. Greenfield route 2. Get it done before 2050!! I want to use this while I can still walk.  Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield alternative to the proposed Atlanta to Charlotte corridor is by far the best solution. UGA students would not have to drive to and 

from the Campus in Athens and points West, if there was a train alternative. Today, Mondays and Fridays see hundreds of students driving to and 

from their homes and school.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Athens has much more potential traffic per capita than the other proposed cities/routes. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

It should absolutely run through Athens. As cities are becoming more crowded midsized cities are steadily growing in population. The Athens we 

have today will be dwarfed by the Athens that will likely exist by the time this route is finished. Gainesville does not have the same potential for 

growth that Athens does and leaving the classic city off the line would be a huge mistake

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Athens is prepared for high speed rail, and given both its central location between Atlanta and Greenville and the fact it is home to the University of 

Georgia, the plan to run a train through Athens makes the most sense of the options.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I support investing in high-speed rail between Atlanta and Charlotte, specifically the greenfield corridor, as I am an Athens Clarke-County resident 

and believe our city would greatly benefit from this alternative form of transportation.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes, bring the Greenfield corridor through Athens! I am a Realtor, professional musician, and local activist, and this is a no-brainer benefit to the 

community, the environment, and expanded work opportunities for Georgia residents. The Athens route offers the best combination of 

affordability and speed, serving the largest potential ridership, and decreasing traffic accidents and congestion along 316 and 85.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

For the love of god, make this a reality. I fully support a High-speed rail from Atlanta to Charlotte (through Athens). Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the idea of high speed rail between Atlanta and Charlotte is a fantastic idea, especially with a stop in Athens!!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love if the line came through Athens! Many people commute between Athens and Atlanta, and it is beyond time for there to be an option 

for more mass transit options between these two cities

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield Line seems the most viable as it goes to 3 airports. Great idea! Let’s get started! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I want to strongly encourage you to choose the Greenfield Corridor route for the Atlanta to Charleston high-speed rail. This route would allow a 

quick connection between UGA, Georgia State, and Georgia Tech, which would be a great book for our university communities. UGA students and 

faculty would be able to use this route to get to the ATL airport. And international visitors to UGA, whether faculty or students would finally have a 

public transit route to our campus.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Please approve the Greenfield route! As a resident of Athens, I know from experience that another form of transportation to and from Atlanta is 

vital for business in our city.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

If we are to do true HSR then the electric Greenfields option is the only option moving forward. Any other option with speeds lower than true HSR 

(150MPH plus) are non-starters. That and the use of diesel is a non-starter.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

 Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Athens has needed a rail system to connect us with Atlanta and other cities for years and it has yet to materialize. This would be a nice as it is the 

cheaper and much faster than the Gainesville route.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

“I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.”

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Though I know it is a source of funding issue, I believe most Atlantans, if given the opportunity to say so, would prefer improved transit in Atlanta 

than a rail line to Charlotte. Not that I am opposed to this line, just think there are more needed options. Of the choices given, I guess i'd go with 

the Greenfield. Being an electric line is important and going through Athens would help to link college areas in GA.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

 Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

A corridor through the Athens will provide the highest projected ridership, thus benefiting the maximum number of citizens. Despite the slight 

marginal increased cost, this option should be pursued by GDOT. High speed rail is a great alternative means of transportation and I would love to 

see GDOT pursuing more of these projects.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I am a resident of Athens Ga. the proposed train to Athens would be something I would very much like to see happen. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I think it should come through Athens. We need it! Think of all the traffic issues it would solve, especially on game days. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in support of the Greenfield Corridor. I believe that having access to a high speed rail will positively effect my home town of Athens, GA by 

improving access to jobs in metro Atlanta and also increasing tourism. This would also save lives by giving people a safer commuting alternative. I 

personally commuted to Duluth for approximately 3 months for work and it was unsustainable for a healthy work/life balance. Traffic is horrible and 

so when I was offered a job closer to home I took it even though my salary took a major hit. If I had the option to take a train to work every day I 

would do it in a heart beat. Not having to worry about traffic or the time spent in a car would dramatically improve many people's job prospects and 

in turn improve lives and economic standing. I would also consider traveling more if there was an alternative to driving to ATL airport. Currently, 

flying anywhere for me is an all day affair considering the hour and half travel time to the airport coupled with the two hours allotted for going 

through security, and however long the flight is. Sometimes I opt to drive to my destination because the time spent traveling is comparable. Having 

a quicker route to the airport would improve travel and tourism overall in a positive way – plus fewer cars on the road is a great thing for the 

environment. I hope this project goes forward.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield option that goes through Athens would be extremely beneficial. It appears to be the best option of the three as well (highest 

potential ridership, highest speed, middle of the road cost comparatively). This would help alleviate traffic between Atlanta and Athens (for students 

that commute, employees that commute, game day traffic, etc.), as well as support economic growth. I highly support my tax dollars going towards 

the Greenfield option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I am a regular commuter from the Athens area to the Atlanta area. Having the Greenfield route chosen and built would be beneficial to me and my 

family as we would take advantage of having a transportation alternative at that location. Right now, I spend at least an hour in traffic each trip 

going and coming back from work. I may not need to go to the Carolinas often but at least an Atlanta-Athens route would make me a regular train 

commuter.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I have to go to the airport ever now and then for business as well as Atlanta. I would ride the train to the airport and to Atlanta if it existed in 

Athens, GA. This would be a great addition to the transportation approaches from Athens to Atlanta. Also, also for people going to UGA games from 

Atlanta it would make a lot of sense for them as well to travel to Athens for a game.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I don't pretend to have absorbed every ounce of this info, but my immediate reaction as an Athens resident is that having a high-speed Atlanta to 

Charlotte rail line coming through my town would be absolutely amazing. My family travels to both of these cities routinely, and we would certainly 

welcome an alternative mode of transport. I think more transit option of this nature is generally a great thing, and I would love to see it happen. 

That Greenfield line looks great, please do it!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Please consider the high speed rail traveling through Athens. This would connect the higher populated athens/ oconee area to Atlanta and 

Charlotte. This would undoubtedly offer more growth potential than the alternative routes.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I'm writing in support of the Greenfield corridor for three main reasons: 1. Fastest route, most riders, reasonable price (Crescent is much cheaper, 

but too few riders) 2. Athens-Atlanta corridor would be a game-changer. I work at UGA and travel to Atlanta often. I would much prefer a train to 

the car. I know many people who make the Athens-Atlanta commute daily who would benefit from this. UGA also hosts many visitors arriving at ATL 

airport who would much prefer an easy train ride to clunky shuttle vans. UGA football game days would also see a spike in ridership on weekends. 

All of this would cut down on traffic congestion and emissions. 3. Athens-SC-Charlotte. I have family in Charlotte and visit multiple times per year. I 

would definitely prefer a train ride and my young kids would really enjoy riding the train to go see grandma and grandpa. I know many people in 

Athens who travel to Charlotte and Greenville/Clemson who would benefit from the train.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

We would like to see the Greenfield Corridor as the chosen option. Students from Atlanta would be able to travel back and forth and this would be 

an easier way to connect to Atlanta Hartsfield for UGA employees and visitors.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I am for this rail! I love Athens, but jobs are limited. I would love the opportunity to work in Atlanta, but remain living here.. We also love to visit 

Atlanta for a long weekend as we have family there. We would utilize this rail often!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

If we're going to do it, let's do it right, choose Greenfield corridor. If travel time doesn't compare very favorably with driving (as it doesn't with some 

of the other corridor alternatives) it won't be well utilized.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield option seems like the best route. Will accommodate higher speeds which will generate more useage. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the rail should come through Athens. Connecting this University town with larger cities via high speed rail will foster economic and cultural 

development like never before. Please make it happen!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the option going through Athens would be the best one to take. Every fall, over 100,000 extra people descend onto the town for game days 

and Athens has more events that attract people from outside its area than Gainesville or Commerce. Additionally, the Athens route seems better 

due to having its own dedicated right-of-way. Using the existing Amtrak Crescent route would force passenger rail to be delayed at the freight 

company's discretion like it is now. On-time performance of the Crescent route is less than 40%. Expanding passenger rail without having dedicated 

right-of-way is foolhardy.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I think a high speed rail system would be great, Especially if it had a stop in Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Love the idea of high speed rail connecting Atl. Athens. Charlotte. Best idea in a long time. Awesome. Green line is best option for North Ga Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Including Athens in the route from Atlanta to Charlotte would have an enormous impact on local economy Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I think a high speed rail system would be great, Especially if it had a stop in Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the idea of a high speed rail line between Atlanta and Charlotte, especially the Greenfield route, which would be extremely useful to my 

family and millions of other people and families. We would go on trips to both Atlanta and Charlotte FAR more often and spend more money in 

those areas if we didn't have to worry about driving/parking/traffic. We used to live in another state where a nice rail line was put in, and it really 

revitalized the area, bringing in business because people had quick, easy access. Large tech businesses, especially, set up shop nearby because they 

could attract a workforce who could come in on the train and not have to deal with traffic. Their employees loved that, and it helped them to grow. 

There was a huge amount of economic expansion in the area. The traffic around Atlanta is so bad that I avoid going there. I wish there were 

alternatives to driving in all that traffic. I am willing to pay taxes to support the building of a high speed rail line.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I would just like to cast my vote, however much that matters, for the high speed route that goes through Athens. It would certainly fill a big need for 

the University and for traffic to and from Atlanta. Plus, as I understand, it has the most potential for ridership and top speed. Thank you for your 

time.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Please select the Green Line for the high speed train from Atlanta to Charlotte via Athens Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Greenfield Corridor because it is the fastest and the most comparable to the rapid transit found throughout Europe, Japan, etc. We are 

way behind in Rapid Transit/High Speed Rail and I fully support the construction and build out of this line. It will help invigorate the economies of 

the different cities/stops along the route and foster a bigger conversation about the possibilities of rapid rail.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I support high-speed rail from Atlanta through Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the development of a high-speed rail through Athens, GA. The south needs to be a leader in high-speed rail development for our country. 

Connectivity between Atlanta and Charlotte will boost the economies of all cities and provide new employment and educational opportunities for 

generations to come. It is a worthy investment in the area, one that will last forever.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes, let's get a train from Atlanta through Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a terrific idea that should be funded now. The third option that constructs a new rail line with a higher speed rail, linking CLT/GSP/ATL 

airports is the preferred route. I would use the GSP line for travel to Atlanta even though I live in Asheville.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a great idea. I think the route that goes through Athens is the best option, as that area is rapidly growing. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I vote for the fastest route. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

A highspeed rail through Athens would be very important Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

The corridor route passing through Athens sounds like the most worthwhile, and I would prefer this one! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to submit my opinion that if the high speed rail is created, it should run the route that goes through Athens! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Please establish the high speed rail route through Athens. This could open up opportunities for jobs in the county with the highest poverty rate in 

Georgia. Thank you!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

As you may remember, plans for the so-called "Brain Train" from GA Tech to UGA have fallen through. Atlanta and the south in general is falling 

behind as far as transportation is concerned, but this is an excellent opportunity not only to connect Atlanta and Charlotte, but to make the Brain 

Train happen again. It might not happen immediately, but just having stations in the same parts of town as Tech, GSU, Emory, UGA, and even some 

of North and South Carolina's universities could encourage their working together across disciplines and across state lines, to say nothing of the 

economic impact it would have. In short, I'd like to encourage you to include Athens on the way to Charlotte. Perhaps later, on another phase, 

there can be a line out in other directions, but I think Athens should be the initial focus this time.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I would very much love for the route to go through Athens, GA. With UGA here, there is an incredible workforce talent pool, and adding high speed 

rail to Atlanta and Charlotte would create so many viable commute opportunities around the region. Thank you.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I am very much in favor of the train passing through Athens. I travel frequently to both Charlotte and Atlanta, and I would much prefer to take the 

train than drive, since I could work while travelling.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Please build the rail line from Atlanta to Charlotte! And go through Athens! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield Corridor would be great for Athens and Atlanta residents. Good for fun, commerce, and collaborative university research across multiple 

institutions.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Please move forward with this. Particularly the Greenfield path. This should have been started 20 years ago. Connecting Athens with Atlanta with 

high speed rail has made sense for 30 years. I know it is expensive, but this money is being spent one way or another,, if it isn't spent on this, then it 

will be spent on something else, so let's spend it connecting Atlanta to Athens to South Carolina to North Carolina.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the route through Athens make the most sense. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Such an exciting project! Please bring this infrastructure to the Athens area - very interested to see the impact that this corridor alternative can 

have on the growth of our city and diverting road traffic for our entire region. Seems like a home run!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Please do put in a high speed rail connecting Atlanta, Athens and surrounding areas. The lack of public transit here is a boon to the environment, 

increases traffic, and leaves no options for people who can't afford or don't want to have a personal vehicle.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Greenfield corridor option for a high speed rail connecting Atlanta to Charlotte. As a 26 year resident of Athens who has over the years 

commuter to Atlanta for work many times, I strongly support this public transportation option that would improve safety, public well-being and 

would provide a more environmentally sustainable way to connect with both Atlanta and other major cities up the east coast.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Preferred Corridor Alternative for the Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and Record of Decision (ROD). Please go through Athens, 

Georgia. There is a vital need for a DC/Research Triangle/Athens/ATL high speed rail transportation.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I highly support the “green corridor” option running through Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I live in Athens and think that an Atlanta to Charlotte rail should include a stop in Athens. I would ride all the time. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

100% pro the Atlanta to Charlotte rail, Green line through Athens would cut down on my long distance driving by many, many miles and reduce 

traffic congestion!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

With the University of Georgia faculty, staff and students having access to Atlanta and the airport, ridership could be high and frequent. A large 

percentage of students are from the Atlanta area. Faculty live in Atlanta and commute. Many guests, speakers, potential student families visit 

Athens. Having railway travel will reduce traffic and connect Atlanta with one of the largest universities in the state. Would love to have a public 

discussion here in Athens.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield Corridor with the train going through Athens seems like a great choice. I am totally biased because I would like to ride such a train 

and would increase my trips to Atlanta tenfold if a train were an option for me. But also, it seems like the Athens plan is a great idea because of 

UGA, generally high ridership, our transportation hub already in existence downtown, and the ability to do a high speed train here. Thank you!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

It's disgusting the State of Georgia would consider the Southern Crescent route which would obviously benefit a foreign institution (Clemson) to the 

detriment to the flagship institution of University System of Georgia. The I-85 plan is laughable due to cost and bringing further congestion to a 

congested corridor. The only appropriate choice for the State of Georgia is the Greenfield solution.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Hello, I would like to express my support for a high speed train from Atl to Charlotte through Athens GA. As one of the largest cities in GA, Athens is 

a natural stopping point to provide increased ridership. Having lived in Athens for 6 years, I consistently have to drive to Atlanta at least 6 or 7 times 

per year. I know that others travel much more frequently than that. This would be a safer alternative that would be more efficient and 

environmentally friendly.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I am so excited by the idea that there would be high-speed rail from Atlanta to Charlotte, connecting all the way to Washington! I could only be 

happier about it if it were possible to build it in the next 5 years. My vote is for the Greenfield alternative route, with stations in Tucker, 

Lawrenceville, and Athens. With higher speed, shorter travel times, and higher annual ridership projected, this appears to be the option that 

would more effectively transport people. The capital investment, while greater than that for a line using a shared freight rail, is half that of the I-85 

Corridor Alternative. I have taken AMTRAK from Chicago to Denver several times. That line shares a track with freight trains and is routinely 

delayed because of it. Please don't doom this line to poor ridership because the trains never run on time.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes, yes, yes! A high speed train between Atlanta and Charlotte would be a game changer for UGA faculty, students, and other professionals in 

Athens who fly often. This would save me literally hours in a car during my week.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I vote for the Greenfield Corridor. Northlake Tucker would be a terrific location for a train station. Rail access to UGA, Greenville and Charlotte 

would be terrific! Plus, transit going south west into Emory, downtown and the airport would be awesome. SO NEEDED!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the suggested rail line from Charlotte to Atlanta needs to come straight through ATHENS GA! Please we have been dying for an easy 

commute between Athens and Atlanta and THIS sounds freakin amazing.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Greenfield Corridor Alternative for this project, as it represents the best balance of initial capital cost versus service to the most riders. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Bring the train through Athens! I've read the proposals, It's the best Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

A highspeed rail between Atlanta and Athens would be highly beneficial, I would use the line once a week. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I've read about the three proposed routes, and I would like to advocate for the "Greenfield" route. Not only would it link Atlanta and Athens, but it 

would (according to GDOT documents) provide services for more riders at higher speeds.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Coming through Athens seems like the most logical route considering ridership and cost. Many Georgians will benefit from car-less, high-speed 

travel between Atlanta, Athens and Charlotte.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

As a resident of Tucker I would be delighted to see a station in my area. Especially if it connected to Athens and the Hartsfield Jackson airport. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love to see the route through Athens! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Would LOVE to see high speed rail go thru Athens and would definitely use it. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this is a wonderful idea. I am originally from Gainesville and used to listen to my grandmother tell stories about how she used to take the 

train to Atlanta back in the 60s--I have never been able to understand why we moved away from that. Why would you sit in a car on I-85 when you 

could sit on a train? I have read about a proposed line through Athens as well. As a student, I used to drive 316 almost weekly going back and forth 

from Athens to Atlanta---a very dangerous road. I don't think I ever drove without seeing at least one accident. A high speed train is definitely 

needed in the area.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I firmly favor the Greenfield corridor (passing through Athens). This rail line could significantly cut down on traffic from Athens to Atlanta, and could 

make it so that daily commutes from Athens to Atlanta would be a more realistic option for people, while simultaneously reducing individual 

environmental impacts.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of the Greenfield Corridor through Athens, GA. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Athens has needed a commuter rail system going to/from Atl for years, if not decades. The route you have proposed through Athens would carry far 

more people and be able to recoup costs much faster then any of the other routes that are proposed. It would help alleviate football gameday 

traffic from Atl, not to mention making it easier to relieve regular commuter traffic along 316/I-85 during the week. There is no reason NOT to have 

it go through Athens.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Please strongly consider running the route through Athens. This would be SO valuable to the Athens community to get back and forth to Atlanta and 

Charlotte w/o having to drive and it would do wonders for the communities along the routes.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

This would be an incredible opportunity for Athens, as many people commute to and from Athens from work each day. Highway 316 is heavily 

trafficked, and the high volume of vehicles and lights makes it incredibly dangerous for drivers. This project would positively impact thousands of 

drivers who make the trip to and from Atlanta each day.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Please consider the Greenfield corridor! It's financially wise as it will carry the highest ridership, allow for fastest speeds, and be cheaper than the 

Interstate 85 rout option. All of us in Athens would take advantage of the train to access shopping, events like football and basketball games, and 

access to the Airport. We would LOVE to stop driving to ATL and causing more congestion!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

This should have been done decades ago. But as the traffic gridlock in the region continues to get worse, it is absolutely essential. This would have 

an enormous positive impact on the region, and help to support this region as a leading research area nationally, efficiently linking the Research One 

universities in Atlanta, Athens, and Charlotte.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Please consider the Athens route for high speed rail. It would strengthen the 4 universities and colleges in the area and allow students to commute. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Athens absolutely should be considered as a stop on this rail! So many of us can not afford NOT to work in Atlanta but want to live OTP. We need a 

rail to connect the East to Atl to help ease the traffic burden all the way up 316.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing in support of the proposed high-speed railway passing through Athens, GA. This route has been projected to offer the fastest travel 

time and highest ridership, and I believe could benefit the northeast Georgia community in a number of ways: -Of the three options, Athens is the 

largest community with no obvious path toward Atlanta (as no interstate runs directly to Athens), and presents an opportunity to better connect 

both cities. This project could serve to reduce congestion on existing roadways (thereby improving safety/future need for expansion), and the high 

volume of students from the Atlanta area, conference attendees coming from Hartsfield-Jackson, and residents who commute into the city for work 

and post-secondary education opportunities could provide sustained ridership. -I believe the attractiveness of Athens as a tourist destination for 

sporting events, music, and cultural expression could also serve as an important factor in increasing/maintaining ridership. -Athens is considered by 

many to be central to operations in northeast Georgia for healthcare, hospitality, and cultural activity; with the rail line running through Athens, this 

could serve to better connect those of northeast Georgia to resources in Atlanta by way of the city already considered a hub for those in outlying 

counties. -As Athens-Clarke is one of the poorest counties in the state, the financial opportunities provided by the railway could serve to create 

sustainable jobs and increase the volume of industries as they exist here already, and provide those members of our community without reliable 

transportation a chance to more easily access resources in the metro Atlanta area. Thank you so much for your consideration.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Please run a high-speed rail corridor through Athens. It would help ease congestion tremendously, as well as provide much easier access to Atlanta. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Please consider having a stop in Athens, GA for the high speed rail. This will opportunity will greatly help the community and UGA. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

please consider athens to be a part of the train route! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe the high speed train should run through Athens Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

After reviewing the alternatives, it looks like the Greenfield Corridor Alternative looks like the fastest, is that correct? I really hope that the 

commission will opt for the route that stops in Athens, as the academic communities between UGA and the Research Triangle would appreciate the 

more direct route. I believe that this could encourage and facilitate so many collaborative projects among the faculty of these institutions, which 

would benefit not only the entire southeast region, but the nation as a whole as well.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I think GDOT need to support this withe route through Athens. With five universities between Atlanta and Athens alone we would see significant 

ridership. Downtown Atlanta entertainment would also see great benefits from the ability to ride a train in vs driving and parking.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Please prioritize the Greenfield line to include Athens, GA along the route. To include this university town that is also one of the most highly 

populous metropolitan areas in the state only makes sense and would ensure that this line functions as a regular commuting line & spurs diverse 

economic development opportunities.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

What Athens and GA need is the Greenfield Corridor! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to voice my opinion that GDOT should adopt the GREENFIELD CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVE AND NS APPROACH, as proposed in the 

documentation, with a train stop in Athens, GA. Athens is home to the flagship University of the State of Georgia and tens of thousands of students, 

as well as a thriving business community. All would benefit tremendously from a train line, as Athens is currently NOT served by an Interstate, 

making transportation slow, tedious, and unnecessarily dangerous. The population would benefit from and use train service not only to Atlanta, but 

also to North Carolina and other cities en route, many of which are "home" to the student population. It would also grow economic prospects for 

Athens, as it would encourage more regional visitors. Again, I strongly support this option and wish I could attend a public meeting, but they are 

being offered in major cities to which I am not connected by interstate. A train would permit my attendance.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

We need high-speed transit through Athens! Please choose accordingly! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Hello, I am an Athens resident and support the "greenfield corridor" through Athens Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I prefer the greenfield route for the high speed rail project. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

The proposed high speed train between Atlanta and Charlotte should run through Athens GA. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

As an Athens resident, we would like the trail option that could connect Atlanta to Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Fantastic. We travel often and wonder why high speed rail isnt available in high density US areas and between CBD's such as Atlanta, Spartanburg, 

Charlotte, D.C. Looking forward to hearing of continued successes on the move forward with this rail project. We're specifically excited about the 

Athens-Tucker-Hartsfield connection. Awesome!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I'm unable to attend the meetings due to the locations and scheduling. While I have trepidation about "high speed rail" projects, if the project is 

actually feasible then the only option is the greenfield. The other two options are two slow and, in one case, too expensive, to make sense as an 

alternative to flying or driving for most people. In addition, the project should consider that high speed passenger rail will operate relatively 

infrequently. As a result, the board should consider the option of high speed freight rail. While the relatively low-speed of traditional rail limits it 

principally to bulk goods, the option of a high-speed rail platform could, for certain goods now carried by trucks, be an excellent alternative along 

these rail corridors. Since the greenfield option would have the system entirely grade-separated, the freight could even be shipped by automated 

vehicles in small trains (this matches the system CSX is currently trying to create in its rail lines and which Canada Rail successfully implemented). 

Cars could be rented by shippers in much the same way they are rented from traditional railroads now; or traditional railroads could "rent" the line 

to operate their own cars. The possibilities are compelling. Failure to consider high speed freight would be a mistake for all the persons 

considering this project.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love the high speed rain to come through Athens! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

The greenfield corridor option is the most sensible if for no other reason than it would facilitate people traveling from Atlanta to UGA home football 

games on the one hand, but would also serve as a major economic driver as it would facilitate connections between virtually every major R1 

university in Georgia and the Carolinas boosting the economic impact of these research universities not just for the State of Georgia but for the 

whole southeastern region. The cheapest alternative would likely take decades before it would reach the same ridership, and it would only 

accomplish that provided the route experienced dramatic growth along the I-85 corridor between Jefferson and Commerce and the South carolina 

border. The more expensive route would likely spur considerable growth in gainesville, and could help alleviate traffic on the Georgia 985 and 

Georgia 400 corridors, but beyond that would likely not see significant ridership without substantial growth, and that seems unlikely because where 

would those people wind up working? That's the single largest consideration here, this isn't a commuter rail line in the same way that it's an 

intercity rail line that could potentially function as a commuter rail line for its last 65 miles or so in either direction.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I cannot emphasize enough how important it is to have a train that goes from Athens to Atlanta. Students need a way to get to the major airport 

that do not have a car here in Athens. Also this opens up many opportunities for students who want to work in Atlanta but live in Athens. It creates 

many opportunities for those living in Athens which is of course a thriving community.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Green line!! It would be amazing to have something like this come through Athens! Allows travel for students who may be far away from home with 

no form of transportation. Also for those small towns around the Athens area. Maybe a line connecting to Savannah as well!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in support of the "greenfield corridor" through Athens. We need to reduce the number of automobiles on the road ways. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Please develop a rail possibility for travel between Atlanta-Athens-Charlotte. This is desirable for ease of travel without automobiles. Thank you! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Green line would be the best Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I hope a train from ATL to Athens and to Charlotte is moving forward. Yes, I would definitely participate in taking this train, and I believe it's a vision 

for the future. It's sustainable for economic, environmental, and social impact and I really hope this happens!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I like the rail going through athens to charlotte Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to see the Greenfield route going through Athens, GA. If you consider Exhibit 2-6: Phase 1 Screening Results, this route is the clear 

winner. We are ready and waiting.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in support of an Atlanta to Charlotte rail with a stop in Athens, Georgia. I am confident that many Athens residents would use this to go to 

Charlotte and also to Atlanta (many commute to Atlanta).

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Would like the Greenfield option to go forward Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Just wanted to express my great enthusiasm for the high speed rail between Atlanta and Charlotte, going through ATHENS! This development 

would be well used by our community, especially college students going back and forth to their family, Uga faculty and staff traveling to airports and 

city activities, and reducing grid lock on 316

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Based on the information I've examined, I would prefer the Greenfield route as it appears to have the most potential ridership and the fastest travel 

time. I ride Amtrak 3-4 times a year between Atlanta and New York. I do this because I enjoy train travel and for environmental reasons. The 

biggest drawback to train travel on this route now is the frequent delay due to freight traffic. I believe that a dedicated line for passenger service 

must be a high priority.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this is a great idea! I would love for there to be high speed rail in the region for several reasons. One, as a UGA alum, I travel back and forth to 

Athens and Atlanta a LOT. If there was high speed rail connecting the two cities, I would definitely be using it to avoid driving on 316 or 78. Second, I 

think a HSR system in the region would GREATLY improve the traffic, specifically on the downtown connector.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe that the Greenfield route would be the best to help connect Athens to Atlanta as well as SC & NC Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

The green line that goes through Athens and makes a stop at gsp looks like the best option to me. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

It is my preference that it goes through Athens. The college students here would greatly appreciate the consideration and would use it frequently. 

Plus there currently is no fast mode of transportation from Athens to Atlanta, and this would greatly alleviate the current traffic. Several professors 

at UGA commute from Atlanta to Athens.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love a high speed rail that goes through Athens to Atlanta! I drive to Atlanta for work from Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Please bring high-speed rail to Athens, Georgia! Think of the students, football fans, and international visitors who'd travel between Athens and 

Atlanta, Athens and Charlotte, and the whole area and the benefits -- economic and environmental -- that would ensue. Although I'm worried about 

the loss of wetlands, etc., the amount of "diverted rides" and the potential 5million riders diverted from cars really impressed me. Gridlock is 

spreading from Atlanta outward and investment in great options such as high speed rail are the only way forward.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Environmental considerations will be fully 

considered in the Tier 2 study.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Light rail options from Athens to Atlanta and Atlanta to Charlotte PLEASE Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. This Project would be an intercity rail project. 

Light rail refers to urban rapid transit systems.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Please consider the Greenfield route through Athens! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe this rail is a great idea to help with the travel time as well as traffic from Atlanta to Charlotte as well as the proposed stops in Athens and 

other cities. This will help alleviate game day traffic and bring a boost to the economy as well. It will also provide an easy route for those who live in 

Athens who work in Atlanta perhaps. I know I would use it as I don’t drive and would love to be able to visit Athens.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Athens! Athens should be on the rail Atlanta to Charlotte! It should not follow the Crescent line, but open up new transportation opportunities to 

other communities.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I prefer the middle cost option - the Greenfield Corridor. Let's catch up with the world on train technology ! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like the train to come through Athens, GA, with scheduled stops. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

As a longtime Athens resident, I am heavily in favor of the option taking the corridor through Athens. Connecting the flagship University of our state 

with Atlanta and Charlotte makes the most sense. Thank you.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Please put the route through Athens, GA Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I highly prefer the Greenfield alternative as it would be the best option to connect multiple universities, GT, UGA, Clemson, etc. etc. The only way 

anyone will ride this line is if it is high speed, which is another reason the Greenfield option is the best alternative.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to see a high speed rail go through Athens, GA. The presence of UGA along with many federal agencies with strong ties to Atlanta 

guarantees that a train would be highly used to transport between Athens and Atlanta. I have family in NC and would definitely prefer a train ride to 

driving on 85. :)

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the greenfield alternative. People in Athens have been clamoring for passenger rail to Atlanta for 25 years. If routed through Athens, it will 

reduce congestion and pollution along 316, 78 and I-85, as well as spur economic development by making travel between Athens and Atlanta much 

easier.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I really like the route that goes through Athens. It makes so much sense with UGA here. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the proposed rail line from Atlanta, through Athens, into Charlotte. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

After reading the Charlotte Observer article on the different corridors that would connect us to Atlanta, I believe that the last option is the most 

feasible. Getting to Atlanta in about 2 hours seems ideal! I believe that there are countries in Europe that connect to other countries under the 

same amount of time. Why wouldn't two states be able to do the same thing?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I have thoroughly researched the Atlanta to Charlotte high speed rail initiative, and I have done a fair amount of research into the Southeast High Speed Rail Corridor. I think the most logical corridor is the 

Greenfield Corridor Alternative. While I currently live in Athens and this might bias my decision, I likely will not be in Athens when these plans come to fruition as I only have 3 more years in medical school 

here. First off, I think the Southern Crescent should be ruled out. While this is the cheapest option, it makes the least sense. The primary purpose of the high speed rail initiative is to link cities together 

at a faster speed than currently available, and the Southern Crescent alternative does not do this. This would lead to a low level of riders and it would not encourage people to switch from their current 

methods of transportation. Second, Amtrak currently links Atlanta and Charlotte in approximately 5 hours and 17 minutes, which is faster than the proposed diesel shared track time and only 42 minutes 

faster than the diesel shared and dedicated track time, which would likely be far away. Additionally, this doesn't compete with airplane travel. Finally, the revenue for the Southern Crescent alternative is 

predicted to be less than the operations and maintenance, making this alternative not feasible. Next, this let's look at the two remaining alternatives - the I-85 corridor alternative and the Greenfield 

corridor alternative. The I-85 corridor has the highest capital cost of any of the alternatives, and is approximately double the projected cost of the Greenfield corridor, which is the only alternative that is 

close to competing in terms of travel time. The annual operation and maintenance for the I-85 corridor is slightly lower (10-15%) than the costs for the Greenfield corridor, but the 2050 projected 

Revenue/O&M cost for the two corridors is almost the same. In the long run, this means that the Greenfield corridor could be profitable sooner. The Greenfield corridor is also the fastest of the 

alternatives, which makes it the most competitive option. The average advertised flight time for Atlanta to Charlotte is 1 hour and 15-25 minutes, depending on the carrier. When you add in the time it

takes to arrive at the airport early, go through security, and collect baggage at the end of the flight, the time it takes for a flight is around 2.5 hours. If the Greenfield corridor is selected and built out 

incrementally, with diesel used first and then electric later on, the train trip would take approximately the same amount of time on diesel, and it would be nearly 30 minutes faster to travel by train instead 

of plane once electric was used. Driving between Atlanta and Charlotte takes approximately 3 hours and 40 minutes without traffic, making the train trip faster for either the I-85 corridor or the Greenfield 

corridor. While both the Greenfield corridor and the I-85 corridor are similar in terms of revenue, ridership, and operation and maintenance costs, I think the Greenfield corridor is the better option due to 

its faster potential travel times and much lower capital cost. Also, I want to discuss ridership for the Greenfield corridor alternative. All 3 of the alternatives have the potential to become frequently used 

commuter rail for commutes into Atlanta from Gwinnett County. However, the Greenfield corridor is the only one that gives the opportunity to link Atlanta with Athens, a growing city with a population 

over 127,000. The current best way between Atlanta and Athens is SR 316, a road that is heavily trafficked during the morning and afternoon rush hours. With a commute time of about an hour from 

Athens to Atlanta without traffic, many people make this commute daily. However, during heavy traffic, this commute easily last over 90 minutes and can sometimes be as long as 2 hours. There are 

numerous professors and students that make this commute daily. High speed rail between Athens and Atlanta would draw many commuters, and this could even be used as a way to fund the rest of the 

development of this line. It would be feasible to open up the Atlanta to Athens part of this line as a first phase, and then extend the line to Greenville and Charlotte after the line initially opens and is able 

to start making money. Finally, I think including Athens as a stop on the Atlanta to Charlotte high speed rail project would help to draw support and funding for this project. Athens is the biggest of the 

cities designated as the first stop outside of Gwinnett county for any of the 3 corridors. The cities are Commerce (Southern Crescent), Gainesville (I-85), and Athens (Greenfield), which had 2017 

populations of 6,881 (Commerce), 40,359 (Gainesville), and 127,064 (Athens). Athens has the largest population of these, which has the potential for the greatest number of riders. Athens is also very 

progressive in terms of funding transportation projects and working on public transportation. In 2017, residents of Athens Clarke County passed TSPLOST 2018, a 5 year 1% sales tax to improve 

transportation within the county. This will be up for renewal in 2022, and it could be used to help fund part of the high speed rail that would benefit the Athens community. Additionally, Athens Transit is 

planning on extending public transportation to Epps Bridge, which is in Oconee County, a site that was mentioned as a potential location for the stop in Athens. The other potential stop would be in 

downtown Athens at the Multimodal Transportation Center, but it would be more difficult to have the high speed rail run through the UGA campus and downtown Athens. The proposed Athens Transit 

bus will link Epps Bridge with the Multimodal Transportation Center, and Athens is looking at ways to make the transit system completely free. Currently, kids ride free, and, this past summer, Athens 

extended free transportation to senior citizens, people with disabilities, and employees of the ACC government. Linking the high speed rail into Athens would also facilitate travel for visitors to the

University of Georgia that fly into Atlanta, and it would link UGA with Georgia Tech and Emory, which would connect the top 3 universities in the state, and 3 of the top 50 universities in the nation.

*Emory would be connected through MARTA with the stop at Doraville and the planned light rail line that will connect Emory and the CDC to MARTA heavy rail. I think that this project would be huge for 

travelers around the Southeast, and this could be a model project for expanding high speed rail around the nation. Once an alternative is selected, and I hope that the Greenfield corridor is selected as it is 

the best option of the three, efforts must be made to find funding for Tier 2 of the EIS and then to move this project forward into design and construction. Thank you for taking the time to read my 

comments!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

A high speed rail between Athens and Atlanta would be great for both cities. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Prefer the greenfield line to activate 10 universities along the route, as well as towns like Athens, which the other routes do not touch. The Brain 

Train was championed by many during the prior decade and would connect the Atlanta University Center (Clark, Morehouse, Spellman), Georgia 

State, Georgia Tech, Agnes Scott, Emory University, Mercer’s north Atlanta campus, Georgia Gwinnett and the University of Georgia. Small depots 

and stations already exist along the line at Emory as well as in Tucker, Norcross, Lawrenceville and Athens.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to see a line through Athens. I believe it would be used by those coming to the University of Georgia to school and those crowds coming 

to Athens for sporting events. It would ease the traffic congestion on highways between Athens and Atlanta.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Please route through Athens. I will use the train 18-24 times per year. Thank you. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

As a business professional in northeast Georgia, the route via Athens Georgia makes the most sense and adds the most value. There is little gained 

by mimicking the 85 route. And there is little economic activity on the route north of 85. Thank you.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I fully support this project but would love to see the project include Athens, home of the state's flagship university, to link it to Atlanta, home to 

numerous other state and private universities. This would be a cheap alternative to government travel reimbursements to UGA employees and 

would stimulate greater cooperation between institutions.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I have lived in both Athens and Charlotte and I think the best option is the corridor running through Athens, GA. Athens is growing economically and 

this route would benefit the employment rate of all cities along the route.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I think that the route through Athens would be the best! Because of the University of Georgia we have lots of travel in and out of the town, but few 

ways to efficiently do so. The train through Athens would be a great boost and help reduce traffic problems, as well as connect one of the top 

research universities in the country to other major cities in the southeast.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

the route through Athens would create a higher-ed corridor connecting multiple universities in Atlanta with multiple universities in Athens. High 

tech and healthcare resources would also be united along this particular route option. The state of Georgia and the SE would benefit from economic 

development and quality of life through the higher ed, tech, and healthcare connections.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

"Greenfield Route" preferred - thanks much! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I think that the route through Athens is the best-- so many students would benefit! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love to see the rail go through Athens, GA. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

As a resident of the Charlotte area, and a lover of train travel, I urge you to select the third option that creates a new corridor and allow speeds up 

to 220 mph between Charlotte and Atlanta. Thank you!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Green, through Athens ga Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield line has the most potential for use by linking to the airport AND Athens. It will be utilized by college kids too which will increase the 

yearly average revenue stream.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

The third option of having a high speed rail with speeds between 125 mph to 220 mph from Charlotte to Atlanta will be a great benefit for both 

cities and others as well. It's about time we catch up to other countries and their faster forms of transport

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

As a resident of Athens, GA, I would love the Greenfield option. Having the train to through Athens would mean guaranteed business to and from 

Atlanta for UGA students and UGA sports game attendees. If only 1/20 of the attendees to the recent Notre Dame game took the train, that would 

still be 4,600 round-trip riders. Also, because the route from Athens to Atlanta is particularly slow (mostly small highways), the train would get more 

use than if it paralleled the interstate. People will pay extra for the convenience and speed of the train.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to see a rail corridor include Athens, Ga. Our large population of individuals who would need to be in DC for many professional reasons, 

plus our heavy percentage of individuals who can't afford to fly out of Atlanta or drive to Gainesville, GA to catch the Crescent would make the 

Greenfield route the preferred one to increase ridership the most. The Greenfield route would also pick up travelers from the Clemson University 

environs.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I enthusiastically support a high-speed rail coridor between Atlanta and DC. Having ridden the Crescent from Gainesville, GA to NO, I know how 

LONG it takes. My preference of fo the Greenfield route, as it will nit two important universities and generate considerable travel opportunities for 

less-well-off people who can't afford to fly from ATL or Greeneville, NC. Gaving traveled by rail all over Europe, it has always been a puzzle to me 

why America has such a shoddy passenger rail system.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Please pick the third option to create a new corridor at a cost of $6.2 billion to $8.4 billion and would get people to Atlanta in about s two hours. 

This is the most cost effective and efficient options of all the rail links

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

High speed rail to Charlotte should be strongly considered. The Greenfield route seems to be the smartest. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

100% pro route #3 for the high speed rail creating a new corridor at 125-220mph. Would be amazing and solidly link CLT and ATL in terms of 

business and leisure. The possibilities and payoffs are endless. Stuck in CLT, hop on the High Speed train and catch a flight out of ATL or vice versa. 

People of ATL could high speed rail to CLT, rent a car and be in Asheville in approximately 4 hours! Business meetings in ATL or CLT are now day trips 

that don't involve an airline. Please make this happen. High speed rail from ATL to DC would be a game changer for the East Coast from business to 

tourism! Also high speed rail from CLT to RDU would be amazing.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

PLEASE find a way to move forward with the high speed train to Atlanta. It would be SO well-used, and such a wonderful alternative to the 

nightmare that driving I-85 currently is. My husband and I both are very supportive of this project. We prefer the Greenfield corridor, because it 

has the best travel time, and also accesses Athens, which would provide great ridership to and from the University of Georgia. We would highly 

recommend that you do not consider the Southern Crescent even though it's the cheapest, as it provides no better travel time than driving, thus 

eliminating one of the most attractive things about the rail alternative.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Atlanta native, born and raised, and current resident of Winston-Salem, NC, a city about an hour outside of Charlotte. I am unable 

to attend the public meeting happening in Charlotte due to lack of public transportation from Winston to Charlotte and the inability to leave work 

early and travel through heavy traffic during the hours necessary. I would like to state my support of this plan and would like to emphasize the need 

for such a railway. The Southeast lacks updated, modern, convenient, and accessable public transit within it's major cities and across the region. In 

my opinion, there's no acceptable reason why the Southeast can't and doesn't have a public railway system comparable to the Northeast's 

extensive public railway system. I would like to explicitly state my support of the Greenfield option, or a combination of both the Greenfield and the 

I-85 option. Specifically I would like to state the importance of having a stop in Athens, Ga. Thank you for this proposal.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love an option that includes Athens, GA Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Please do option 3 the fastest train to Atlanta from Charlotte! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I think that the third option with the bullet train would be the most beneficial. If the train is no faster than driving, people will not see the incentive 

to use it. With the bullet train option, that argument is invalid. It also costs less. As cost projections are rarely accurate since anticipating every issue 

is impossible, starting lower is beneficial. Also, having the option of taking the train to places like DC is extremely attractive.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Please do the trains, the corridor that goes through south Gastonia and Athens Georgia would be awesome. I’m already planning trips. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Please choose the Greenfield option Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I would very much love to see the greenfield option happen. For my family and for the employees of multiple businesses I own and manage. I could 

see using this multiple times a week.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Please support the route that goes through Athens. With the rapidly growing greater Athens area and the tens of thousands of students there, there 

is a huge base of potential customers.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Railway support from Athens to atlanta Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Thank you for the survey! I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation 

and obscene traffic during the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option. Thank you for the 

survey!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe the Greenfield route proposal would be the most beneficial. One large benefit would be connecting the University of Georgia to Metro 

Atlanta and Charlotte which will allow students to expand their internship and job opportunities.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of Corridor between Athens and Charlotte Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

As a resident of the Athens area I support routing the train through the city. It would be excellent for the economic development of the city and 

would bring jobs and new businesses to the area.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the track that goes through Athens, GA. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

It would appear that the third option listed..(A third option is to create a new corridor at a cost of $6.2 billion to $8.4 billion. It would whisk 

passengers along at 125 to 220 mph and get them to Atlanta in as little as two hours.) is the best. Even if we get no federal funding, the states 

should build this. What an attractive option for our citizens safe travel and for improving the environment.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

 Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Please build this railway corridor. I travel often for work and my company does business in Athens often. This requires the 1.5-2.5 (dependent on 

traffic) trip to ATL airport to be made weekly for myself as well as other company executives that simply hate the drive and waste of time/money in 

taking a day for commuting to the city. This provides Athens at a large economic disadvantage in comparison to many other cities in the south and 

causes my company to evaluate and reconsider our Athens operations on a yearly basis as it consumes so much additional travel time between 

major cities and airports. This railway would link major cities with smaller cities and bring economic opportunists and jobs to many people not just in 

the railway industry itself but in the ability to provide many companies an easier way to travel and move people around the surrounding 

communities without wasting time.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

BUILD THE RAILROAD THROUGH ATHENS TO CHARLOTTE Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

High speed rail through Athens please. We have so many commuters to and from Atlanta for the university and games already. This just makes 

sense.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

“I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I’d be 1000% supportive of this project. It would bring more connectivity to the South, more job opportunities and travel possibilities. Not to 

mention the reduction in car traffic especially between Atlanta and Athens. I hope this project comes finally through after so many years of 

promises.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

The new corridor is the only option that will be universally successful because it's the only one that offers passengers significant time savings. The 

Crescent option or I-85 option do not save car riders any time, so car riders will not use the rail line.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I fully support the high speed rail option that travels through Athens GA to make it's way northward. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I work in Raleigh, live in Charlotte, and my family lives in Atlanta. Connecting the top three southern cities where people can commute back and 

forth would increase the economy and lower barriers for all three cities. For this project to succeed, the commute time has to be significantly 

lowered, therefore, the portion I support is the 2 hour commute creating a new corridor at a cost of $6.2 billion to $8.4 billion. This is the clear 

winner, as the commute to cost ratio is a no brainer from amongst the three options. I clicked no to the meeting since I am in Raleigh during the 

week, however, if minutes are available I would love to access and review all documents. My information is from a GA newspaper.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I want to strongly voice my support for the high speed rail project connecting Charlotte and Atlanta. In particular, I support the third option 

(Greenfield) as it appears to be the fastest route that will see the most passengers.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the meeting Tuesday but I would like to express my support for the Greenfield option. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

We would love the Greenfield corridor that includes Athens, Ga as a stop. My family has to drive to Atlanta often for doctor appointments and a 

high speed train option would be so welcome for us.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Please select the green line that stops in Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

An option for transit from Athens to Atlanta Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Writing in support of the Greenfield option Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I like the green line option. Having a light rail that runs from Athens to Atlanta would be incredibly valuable to do many people. Airport trips, dinner 

dates, conventions, and job commutes would all be much easier.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Athens should be on the route! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Please add transit options to Greenville Athens and Atlanta. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of high speed train lines connecting Atlanta to other major cities. The Greenfield line connecting with Athens would be particularly 

helpful for our family, because my husband commutes from Athens to Atlanta every day for work.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

As a resident of Lawrenceville and a student at the University of Georgia, I support the Greenfield corridor. I believe that it would be beneficial for 

future generations that attend the University of Georgia as well as help ease congestion on GA-316. The line would get a lot of use for Georgia 

football games and would help commuters from Gwinnett county get to Atlanta easier than bumper to bumper traffic. As lawrenceville is the seat of 

gwinnett, it makes since to run the line through the city.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield, please! It would be so terrific to have a new alternative, not already served by interstate or Amtrak! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am a citizen of the state of North Carolina and my family is from Atlanta area. I routinely travel there at least two times per year. If this project 

were to be completed, we would likely travel back and forth several more times per year. This will be a massive boost to the economies of all states 

and would be the most significant improvement in transportation in the history of our country. Enough time has been spent trying to please 

everyone with the boondoggle of the NEPA process. We need to pick the greenfield alternative that it fastest and most useful and get started 

building immediately.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Please build the Greenfield line through Athens, which is a regional tourist, music and sports attraction that would greatly benefit economically from 

additional transportation options. In addition, Athens-Clarke County has committed to transitioning to 100% Renewable Energy, making it a green 

flagship city for the southeastern region; therefore, providing this relatively clean and efficient mode of transportation would facilitate the 

implementation of one of Athens' goals, which is to reduce net carbon emissions generated from transportation.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

South corridor preferred- through Athens and GSP airport Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I love the fastest option for routes. It would be a game changer in working along the east coast. I could easily live in Charlotte but work in Raleigh, or 

even Georgia. That is huge! It would also increase tourism in all of these areas. People would love to travel by train! People want to work all the 

time, or be doing something. In a train, they could sleep, read, socialize, or work. I think it’s worth the tax dollars to build the best version of this.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am all for the Railway coming to Athens !! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I have family in Charlotte and would use the high speed train a lot! If it stops in Athens, I imagine UGA students and fans would take advantage as 

well.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love to travel the Green route through Athens, GA, especially Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love the rail option that goes through Athens! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I like the Greenfield line. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Greengield option. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Please do not leave Athens out of this high speed railway plan. It’s a great idea and people in Athens would love to be able to be connected to 

Atlanta in this way.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to see a reduction in traffic from Atlanta to Athens, and a fast alternative to driving from Athens to Charlotte. This would be well used 

during Football season and hopefully cut down on traffic.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

After reviewing the three options, I support the Greenfield option. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am so very much in support of an Atlanta to Charlotte high speed rail coming through Athens. That would be wonderful and I would vote to fund it 

again and again.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Please bring the green line through Athens! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the greenfield option. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I’d prefer the rail line to go from the airport to Athens, GA. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Please move the GREENFIELD option forward!! I would love for the rail to go through Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

This would be a good thing for Athens and the surrounding areas. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Please take this rail line through Athens, Georgia. This would make the otherwise terrible commute from Atlanta much better, and it would allow 

experts who live in Atlanta to teach more conveniently in Athens. In addition it would allow better transfer of people and talent between the CDC in 

Atlanta and the Vet School in Athens.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Please allow the train to come through Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I’m a recent graduate from UGA, coming from Europe and now living in California before moving back to the East Coast next year. Connecting 

Atlanta to the state’s flagship research institution in Athens via fast, reliable public transportation (as well as to economics hubs in NC/SC) is the best 

option by far. In particular given that Athens is NOT located on I-85 (unlike Commerce), this link would be strategically enormously valuable. For 

UGA student/faculty recruitment it would change the calculus for the better by a significant margin, especially for international students and out-ofstate prospective Bulldawgs, especially in enabling a direct and easy connection to two major airports. It would also take the load off of strained 

Route 316 and routes leading north up to I-85 from Athens, saving dozens of lives annually, and easing traffic flowing into I-85/285 during peak. It 

would also create a tangible impact for supporters of Athens and Atlanta sports, making transportation from city to city (especially after members of 

a group have been drinking) both easier and less risky. Candidly I think all of these are great options and it would be great to see more rail in 

Georgia, period. However, while it would undeniably be a boost to Commerce or Gainesville to be on the route, for Athens/UGA to keep growing 

into a role as a secondary urban economic hub role for the state, a rail link to ATL and NC/SC is increasingly essential.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I'd like to express my enthusiasm for the corridor option that includes running the railway through Athens, GA. I think it would be fantastic not only 

for our community but for others as well. I'd be happy to use it as a transportation option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

The high speed rail to Atlanta is an amazing idea that absolutely needs to be pursued! The new, highest speed corridor should be the only option, as 

it makes no sense to invest in an outdated and slow Amtrak route that doesn’t get people to their destination any faster than driving and would 

undoubtedly be plagued by the same problems as the Northeast corridor

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I couldn't make the meetings this wéek as I have other commitments. I am a strong supporter of the Tier 1EIS project and am glad to see us working 

to catch up with other parts of the world in rail transportation. I believe the Greenfield and then the 85 corridors will better serve the state. I am 

hoping all corridors will have easy access to the Atlanta and Greenville airports. Feel free to contact me on future meetings.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I love the Greenfield option. Having an easier route between Atlanta and Athens would be so beneficial to so many people. In my personal life: it'd 

make it easier to see family (in atlanta), create more job opportunities to me, create more hiring opportunities to my employer (and to UGA!). 

Currently, the commute between the two cities is unreasonable; this could fix that.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I love the idea of a railway that goes from Atlanta and extends through Athens, GA. There are thousands of students who would use the railway, and 

tens of thousands of people who clog up the highway at times such as football game days who would benefit from such a railway. Athens suffers 

from horrendous traffic issues, and a railway would do so much good for the city as a whole. Please consider choosing the route option that will 

come to our city!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I LOVE the idea of one of these systems of transportation through Athens, GA! as a student who often factors in cost of transportation as a barrier to 

travel, this would make visiting both Atlanta AND cities throughout the Carolinas more accessible and cost effective. The Greenfield path (or I guess 

anything through Athens) has my vote!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I definitely favor running the rail line through Athens. I-85 skipped us, and my understanding is that I-85 was actually re-routed away from Athens 

after small parts had been built. Please don't leave Athens out this time.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Please choose the route that goes through Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I wanted to voice my full support for the high speed rail that would have a stop in Athens en route to Charlotte, NC. I believe it will be a major step 

in the right direction for affordable and green transportation

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Very glad to see this rail line under proposal. I would appreciate the ability to go from Athens, Ga to the airports in in Greenville, SC or Charlotte, NC 

without having to go to Hartsfield-Jackson airport in Atlanta. I would advocate for the green route as proposed. It would be a boon to the economy 

of Greenville to have a rail connection from Athens to the Greenville airport; lots of UGA travel could go through there.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I really think that a high-speed rail between Atlanta and Charlotte would open up a lot of great options for residents of Georgia to seek employment 

in areas beyond their immediate area of residence. I also have friends and family in Clemson and Anderson and Greenville so I would love a travel 

option to get there and back easily.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield all day. If North of 85 shows more need, then please connect Athens to the new line. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the route through Athens would generate a LOT of use from students at UGA without cars/out of state. Additionally, Athens is a fast growing 

and expanding city. I wouldn’t miss out on the opportunity to have a station in Athens or wait on it.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Although I am not able to attend the meeting regarding the high-speed rail, I want to emphasize my support and desire for the Atlanta to Charlotte 

route. As an Athens citizen, I would frequently use the train to Atlanta.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield is the most useful proposal. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athens citizen unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic 

during the travel hours necessary, but I would like to explicitly express support for the proposed Atlanta-Charlotte railway, including the 

GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Full support of the Greenfield Corridor, there are so many students, alumni, and visitors that would love to easily travel between Athens and Atlanta. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support the Greenfield corridor using electric trains to connect Atlanta to Charlotte via Athens. The city is host to the state’s flagship 

university (UGA), and is quickly developing a home for small businesses, technology start-ups, and research incubators as part of the innovation 

district. It’s also home to museums, outdoor recreation, performance venues, and athletic events. This rail line would decrease impact of vehicle 

traffic while increasing the city’s profile and connection people across to the state and region. We want and need this train!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the Greenfield corridor option that includes Athens in the journey from Atlanta to Charlotte should move forward. I think this would benefit 

the students of UGA in terms of opening up an easier connection to another major city with employers, it has the potential to improve the local 

Athens economy by giving people easier access to higher paying jobs in Atlanta without needing a car to commute, and would open up Athens to 

both easier commerce and tourism.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenway alternative makes most sense to me - Athens needs to be on the route. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to responsibilities during the travel hours necessary but I 

would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option. I live in Athens and work in Atlanta, as do many here. Public transportation 

increases between Athens and Atlanta with no detriment to the overall route end would most benefit the largest number of people.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

we have needed train service between ath and atl for a long time, and it has been proposed in a number of different formats (eg. the "brain train") 

the addition of train service near the athens area would be a boon to those of us who travel frequently for university business and eliminate the 

frequent need to drive into atlanta either in a shuttle or single car, hopefully reducing atlanta traffic. this would also go a long way towards 

encouraging folks in athens to even consider visitng atlanta (as it stands now, i have only been to atlanta to get to the airport in 15 years) for the 

other things the city has to offer, not to mention going north and visitng other cities on the line. please make this happen.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love high speed rail through Athens to Charlotte & Atl!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like the Greenfield option to go through to provide public transit to Atlanta from Athens Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of high speed rail between Charlotte and Atlanta using the corridor that would allow the highest speeds (220 mph). This is an important 

investment. Getting as many cars off the road as possible will prevent more negative climate change

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to see the Greenfield route as an option. As a resident of Athens, GA, we would use this route often to visit Atlanta for work, recreation 

and also to fly from the airport. I can also see us using it in the Eastern direction as well.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

While I think the overall concept is a good idea, the green line is the best alternate for achieving this goal while spreading out the congestion (move 

away from the 85 corridor!). Land acquisition will likely be easier along the green route. There are already too many warehouses concentrated 

along 85 & the truck traffic is ridiculous. Adding ANYTHING else along 85 would be grossly irresponsible. Thank you.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am sure you have heard from many other Athenians hoping for high-speed rail to Atlanta. This has been badly needed for a long time; highway 316 

is clogged and dangerous, with many lights and intersections; Highway 85 skipped us; Atlanta traffic is paralyzing no matter where you are coming 

from. The state seems to have given up trying to solve the problem, which only gets worse every year, and it has been years since we have seen a 

proposal. The proposed Greenfield line would be a huge boon to both cities. Many Athenians including myself would also use it to go to Greenville 

or even to Charlotte if an easy alternative to the Atlanta airport became an option. From reading the documents and the executive summary, the 

Greenfield line seems to make the most sense--the Crescent line is cheaper, but it doesn't really do what we'd want from a high-speed rail in terms 

of performance, and it has the high social and environmental justice impacts that are not what we need in Georgia now.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

GREENFIELD Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I live in Watkinsville and am writing to support a high speed rail project connecting Atlanta to Charlotte and would explicitly support the option to 

link Athens to the rail line (southern route). This would be a transformative option and would also allow tens of thousands of college students and 

local Athens-area citizens to more easily travel throughout the region. Thank you.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

The 220mph option from Atlanta to Charlotte needs to happen. Getting left out of a project of this magnitude would be akin to rejecting sustainable 

growth.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

We support rail through Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love for a train/subway to go from Atlanta to Athens. It would be really helpful. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Please include Athens as stop. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Please make a stop in Athens. We would love this. We have family in Charlotte. It would be a great way to go. We love riding trains. Thanks! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Greenfield Plan for this railway Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Athens really needs to be on the rail system. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in support of the greenfield line due to the speed of operation. I think that is by far the most important aspect when choosing a corridor. Most 

people will be looking to travel from Charlotte to Atlanta so the intervening stops are of relatively less importance. This needs to be electric to 

achieve top speeds. If done well and with an eye towards the best technology and speed, this could have immense economic impact for the region

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Please take the path that cuts through Athens Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I just want to echo the support of Im sure many others of the Greenfield option. Connecting the city of Athens to the city of Atlanta as well as being 

the only option with a dedicated high speed electric option means this is seems to be the clear winner when it comes to utility and and public good. 

Hope this is the route that is chosen.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Hi, I'd like the Greenfield option going forward. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

EVERYONE PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO FILL OUT THIS PUBLIC COMMENT FORM: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/AtlCha19 I am writing as an 

Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during the travel hours 

necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Please take the path that cuts through Athens Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Please choose greenfield option Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Please have the high speed railway from Atlanta to Charlotte go through Athens! (Via the Greenfield route) Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Please consider the high speed train from ATL - Charlotte going through Athens! As someone who grew up in NYC, I can say that this will easily 

attract not only thousands of UGA students but countless others in need of a transit system like this as well. This would be incredible!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Green line! We need a train through Athens! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Greenfield option, as it has the shortest travel time and hits the major mid points between Atlanta and Charlotte, and gives Athens, GA 

a much needed public high speed transportation option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would LOVE a railway to Atlanta! Most UGA students I know would use it like crazy. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Greenfield line and would encourage the GDOT to build this line, as it would provide an easy access for hundreds of thousands of 

people traveling to and from Athens, GA every year, as well as providing simple access from the State’s Capitol to the State’s flagship institution of 

higher education.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I greatly support the idea of having a high speed railway go through Athens and I just wanted to voice my support! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like the Greenfield option! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

The gross lack of public transportation options connecting Athens and the University of Georgia (our flagship institution, I might add) to the rest of 

the state and country is shocking and extremely problematic for a miriad of social and economic reasons. As such, I unequivocally support the 

Greenfield plan for its great potential to remove barriers to traveling to and from Athens, as well as increase its accessibility to the Atlanta metro 

area, other nearby cities, and beyond.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield option please! Athens is the busiest hub in northeast GA. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I should have probably included in my previous comment that the Greenfield route would be my preference, but any Atlanta Approach that goes 

through Lawrenceville would be amazing.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this going through Athens is a great idea! It gives the students more accessibility and more travel options and I think it would raise revenue in 

all stop locations.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Going through Athens is an incredibly exciting option for high speed rail Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Writing in my support for the route option through Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I cannot make it to the public meeting but I strong support the GREENFIELD option. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I'm writing to express my desire for the Greenfield option - particularly, that I would like to see it implemented. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

This would be amazing, especially if it ran through Athens too. Could reduce drunk driving, give folks access to experiences in other cities, reduce 

game day traffic etc.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I’d like to support the Greenfield alternative Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

It would be so economically beneficial to have a train stop in through Athens on the way to Atlanta. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would prefer it follow the CSX line through Lawrenceville, then Athens... Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option. This would greatly improve quality of like for 

many of our underserved here in Athens and provide an extremely valuable mode of transportation to reduce significant traffic during UGA home 

games.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am an Athens, GA resident who would love to see the GREENFIELD railway route implemented. I moved from Atlanta to Athens to attend UGA, and 

stayed in Athens after graduation, now working at UGA. It would be incredible to have Athens be a stop on the railway between Atlanta and 

Charlotte. I am unable to attend the meeting to express my support for the GREENFIELD line in person. Thank you for your consideration!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love it if the GREENFIELD option would go forward. Although I would support this project regardless of the alternative selected. Alternative 

transit is so important and this is a great idea!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Athens please! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield route. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.”

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the rail line going through Athens.. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing to express strong support for the high-speed Atlanta-Charlotte rail proposal and explicitly for the Greenfield option to include Athens! 

North Georgia desperately needs public transportation, and the Southeast in general needs more rail options. Please give us the rail and include the 

Greenfield option!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Would be amazing if we had transportation from ATL to AThens to Greenville to Charlotte. My dad always said Atlanta would go all the way to 

Charlotte one day. Make it happen.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield option is the way to go Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

It would be great to have the Greenfield route connect Athens, GA to both Atlanta and Charlotte! It would be a great way to decongest the highway 

and find a more environmentally friendly alternative.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Green route through Athens, please! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

“I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.”

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I love the idea of the high speed rail! The third option seems like the best all around, medium price and the highest speed. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Greenfield option Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am hoping that the railway is put in to include Athens GA!!! We need a rail connection! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

The highspeed rail line that connects Athens with Atlanta and beyond has been a wish of mine since moving to Georgia. I would love to take in 

events in ATL - soccer games, theater, restaurants, museums - but battling the traffic and struggling with parking makes this a rare occurrence. 

Being able to take the train to the ATL airport would also be so much more convenient!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday, but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD 

option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Please send the high speed rail through Athens! It is such an event to get back and forth to Atlanta, especially when you're just going to fly. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

“I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.”

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and terrible traffic during the 

travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option!!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Please run through Athens! The Greenfield option would be great Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I like the 6.2 to 8.4 Billion dollar plan for a high speed rail. Seems like you get the most bang for your buck and the most potential passengers using 

this.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

The route needs to come through or near Athens. As the largest university in GA, it will ensure regular use and increased ridership. This allows 

airport access for those that need to fly, and if the route extends up the east coast, travel options for students from out of state. Your website did 

not work well on mobile which is how many people will try to access it.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I live outside of Athens and travel to Atlanta regularly. I support a better, faster, more ecological approach to travel in this region. I can’t support this 

project more.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like the Greenfield option Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option. This high speed rail could do wonders for Georgia’s economy. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I'm all in for the Greenfields route for high speed rail that passes through Athens, GA. This new route would connect disconnected areas to train 

transportation.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lack of public transportation and obscene traffic during the 

travel hours necessary. I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option. I am for ANY public transportation we can now build. 

We must give people options for travel.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the greenfield option for rail service between Atlanta. Athens is an important destination — the University of Georgia is here. We would 

love to leave our cars at home and take a train to other cities. Please build this rail line through Athens. Thank you.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenville option that routers through Athens would allow people to access jobs and healthcare in Atlanta Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I prefer the Greenfield option because it is the quickest of all three options and therefore has the potential of securing the greatest number of 

passengers.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Please choose the train line from atl to Charlotte that goes through Athens. Athens could bring a lot of passengers to the train. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Option 3 for CLT to ATL transport seems like a good plan for travelers! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like the Greenfield option to go forward! Connect Athens to ATL and Charlotte! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield corridor would be so amazing! Don't do the I-85 route, there's plenty of interstate there already. A train through Athens would be 

absolutely incredible for the Athens economy and UGA community.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing because I am unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during the 

travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like the Greenfield option to move forward. Also the amount of traffic a high speed rail connecting Athens to Atlanta would reduce is 

substantial.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I like the Greenfield option for the high speed rail Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and terrible traffic during the 

travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Can’t attend the meeting in Charlotte on the proposed rail to Atlanta but I’m very much in favor of a high speed rail between DC and Atlanta. I 

would be in favor of the route that is the fastest. We have other trains that can do more “local” stops but we need high speed to compete with air 

travel and give travelers more options. Europe and the UK and Japan have great high speed rail. We should too regardless of cost.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to support the Greenfield railroad option Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like the Greenfield option that goes through Athens. Thank you! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

As an Athens resident, I would greatly appreciate the option to commute to Atlanta by rail, and I know many others who would as well. If the 

Greenfield option creates that possibility, then I support it wholeheartedly.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield option be great for Athens, GA Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

As a former textile industry business owner, I have ridden many miles in all the proposed corridors. I recommend the Greenfield Corridor which 

could take advantage of flatter, more open and cheaper land that is ideal for future residential or business without impacting the environmental and 

water quality sensitivity of the mountain region. Recent growth of Greenville SC is toward the south of the city. Also, it would offer an easier future 

link to Columbia SC and to Charleston SC eventually.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Please, please, please approve the Greenwood alternative. It would change so many lives. Imagine being able to live in Atlanta and attend UGA; or 

being able to live in Athens and work in Atlanta; or being able to take the train to a concert, to a football game, to get care at Emory or to attend a 

conference. Imagine not having to be excluded from all these things if you can't drive (or can't handle 12 lanes of high-speed traffic). Imagine the 

decrease in traffic injuries and fatalities (did you know transit is 10x safer than driving?). Imagine the improvement in air quality. I live in Athens and 

work full-time so I'm not able to attend any of the public meetings--but it doesn't mean I'm not deeply, passionately supportive of this project.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Recommend Greenfield Corridor - based on ridership estimate and time of travel Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Choose option 3. It would get there sooner and potentially have more customers Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

As an Athenian, I strongly support the GREENFIELD route for the high speed rail. Thank you! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I completely support the creation of this rail system and would use it every day. It would lead to great economic benefits for Athens and Northeast 

Georgia. Atlanta businesses would also be able to tap into a highly educated market with many college-educated professionals.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

As someone who loves traveling across Georgia and the Carolinas, I think this is an excellent plan, and as a graduate of UGA in Athens I think in 

particular the route through Athens is the best; it provides an alternative to game day traffic, a way for students to travel between their family 

homes in Atlanta and school in Athens, and Athens is all around a beautiful place to visit and I believe a rail through there would attract a lot of 

visitors and revenue for Georgia. Personally I would take the rail all the time just to visit Athens from Atlanta, I would save so much on gas.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

A high speed rail stop in Athens would be a huge boon for us! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

To the GDOT: I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene 

traffic during the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option. Thank you, Timothy Moore

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

“I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.”

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to express my support for the Greenfield option through Athens. I was a supporter of the "Brain Train" concept from years ago, 

connecting The University of Georgia with Ga Tech and Emory University as well as the Atlanta business community. Please choose the Greenfield 

Route.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as a UGA student unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation but I would like to 

explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option. Not only would this benefit UGA students, but the Athens community as a whole. Getting to 

the airport currently in Atlanta from Athens or vice-versa is currently a hard task and would be much easier with this.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I support high speed rail between Atlanta and Charlotte. The route that attracts the most riders is the one to build. Since Atlanta is at the end of the 

Southeast corridor, the fastest one is the best for Atlanta. It happens that this route would attract the most riders as well.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

“I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.”

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am strongly in favor of the Greenfield route that runs through Athens. I feel with the university this route would get a great deal of use. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I love the idea of a high speed rail and think the Greenfield option would be the best for the area. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I'll say this as not only a resident of Athens (who would LOVE some means of mass transit to Atlanta and to Charlotte because traffic is so awful in 

either direction) but as a world traveler who has been on train systems in the US and abroad - the train from Tokyo to Kyoto was amazing. The train 

from Hamburg to Copenhagen was also amazing. We currently do not utilize the crescent because Gainesville is too far from Athens for it to be a 

useful mass transit option (and let's face it, the Crescent is WAY too slow.) Put rail corridors where the people are and want to go. The Greenfield 

corridor provides the most utility out of the proposed corridors. If we were talking about another slow-mover with many stops like the Crescent, the 

Gainesville route might make more sense.... but for a high speed, limited stop people mover, you don't need to stop in small towns like Toccoa. This 

route also fulfills the long time dream of the Athenian "brain train" (and could even do some double duty in Athens for football traffic on certain fall 

Saturdays. How many folks are going from Gainesville to Clemson on game day? Not many. How many are going from Lawrenceville to Athens? 

Tens of thousands.) Of course, if Georgia and the US want to enter the 21st century, all of the above proposed train routes would need to be 

implemented eventually. Getting from Tokyo to Kyoto in about 2 hours was quite nice, but I was also able to take the trains in Tokyo to everywhere 

in the surrounding areas, including Tokyo Disney and a train stop about 10 minutes from my friend's apartment in the outer suburbs. But start 

with the routes that give us the most use first. Heck, a direct train route from Athens to Gainesville would be used by my husband, since he 

regularly travels there... by car.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support choosing the Greenfield route that goes through Athens. Athens has a large student population and public transit is already widely 

liked and used. If the route goes through Athens, it will be used and effective. Additionally it could do a lot to reduce Game day traffic which is a 

huge burden Thank you! Go Dawgs!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

“I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.”

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield option seems the least problematic. And it would include Athens, the home of a major university. Athens is now isolated due to 

conservative politics, including gerrymandering. Georgia will not remain rural for long and we must think of future modes of transportation.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to see the light rail come through athens ga. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I live in Athens and it’s too far to go to attend the open house but it would be amazing and so useful to have high speed rail from Atlanta to 

Charlotte and through Athens! I support the greenfield plan as the fastest but still less expensive option. Please do this, it’s been talked about for 

years and years and would greatly benefit the community.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Please make this go through Athens. This is a wonderful project idea! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield route through Athens would be a life changing advantage for many Athenians. Being about to commute between Athens and Atlanta 

via commuter train would provide unprecedented access to Atlanta for the citizens of Athens. It would also upon up routes of travel to the northern 

corridor that I never thought would be possible as a citizen of Athens.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

EVERYONE PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO FILL OUT THIS PUBLIC COMMENT FORM: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/AtlCha19 In the comments 

concerns box feel free to simply copy this statement: “I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to 

lack of transportation and the time necessary to travel but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option. Athens needs this 

option so much!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Yes!!!!, I would support this fully and opt for route option #3 around $6.2B yielding fastest times and most passengers. Thank you for conducting this 

environmental study and receiving public comment.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to express my support of the Greenfield option. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an UGA student unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic 

during the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option for the proposed high speed rail option from Atlanta to Charlotte. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as a Gwinnett citizen unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic 

during the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an UGA student unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic 

during the travel hours necessary, but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option. Thanks!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am thrilled by the idea of high speed rail that would extend between Atlanta and Athens (and then to Greenville and Charlotte). There are so many 

ways in which this would benefit the Athens community and beyond. In addition to the numerous visitors the university sees every year, there is 

also a more transportation-challenged population that could really benefit from reliable transportation to Atlanta and surrounding areas.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to endorse the Greenfield corridor option. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I express support for the Greenfield option. That will change a lot of lives here in Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Please consider the green route through Athens. I am elderly and rarely go to Atlanta alone. We have been promised a rail line for years, but it has 

never materialized. I cannot attend meetings in Atlanta, but with a rail line Atlanta would be more accessible for many of us.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I cannot make it to planning meetings, but support the Greenfield option which would transform not only long distance travel, but also travel 

between Atlanta and Athens, 2 major hubs of intellectual and economic activity kept separate by extreme traffic and lack of public transport.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an UGA student unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic 

during the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I don't live in Athens, but my husband works in Athens and I'm often in Athens for work and personal reasons. We live just outside of Athens. We are 

unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to obscene traffic during the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express 

support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am a UGA student unable to make it to the meeting but I would like to express support for the GREENFIELD option. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Come through Athens! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the greenfeld option for the high speed train initiative. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of the Greenfield option. Having rail service in Athens, Georgia, would revolutionize the transportation opportunities in the area. We 

have a dearth of public transit and this would make a huge difference for us. I am unable to attend the meeting.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to show support for the Greenland plan that goes through Athens as a way to provide college students an environmentally friendly way 

to travel without congesting roadways.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an UGA student unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday but I would like to explicitly express support for the 

GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as a citizen of the Athens area unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lack of public transportation and obscene 

traffic during the travel hours necessary - but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as a citizen of Monroe, Georgia and employee in Athens, Georgia, unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday in Atlanta due 

to rush-hour traffic and lack of public transportation during the travel hours necessary to attend the event. However, I would like to explicitly 

express support for the extension of the Southeast High-Speed Rail (SEHSR) from Charlotte to Atlanta "GREENFIELD" option. This would benefit 

residents and work commuters in many communities throughout Georgia, as well as South and North Carolina. We have long-time friends in 

Charlotte that grew up with us in Athens, Georgia, and they do a lot of driving back and forth to visit family and friends. Both of our families would 

use this public transportation option frequently. Thank you for your consideration of this project.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Greenfield route that goes through Athens. An Atlanta to Athens high speed rail project has been talked about for many years. Please 

make it a reality.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the GREENFIELD option Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am unable to attend the public meeting but would like to provide input regarding the rail route options for the proposed Atlanta to Charlotte line. 

Providing a connection between Atlanta and Athens would be a brilliant choice. Our University is among the top in the nation and it would behoove 

the city AND state to create an alternative way to travel to Athens. I would implore the committee to select the Greenfield Corridor. Thank you!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am an Emory student unable to make it to the meeting on Tuesday due to classes but would like to explicitly express support for the greenfield 

option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe the Greenfield option is the most economical and provides a needed alternative for Athens-Atlanta and Athens-Carolinas transportation. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an UGA student unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic 

during the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I highly support this as someone who lives in Atlanta and often visits family and friends in Athens, Ga. The railway would make it so much easier. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

We need this! Traffic to ATL from Athens is bad at times. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an UGA student unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic 

during the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the Greenfield Line will provide the most access through Georgia. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to the lack of public transportation and the traffic conditions 

during the relevant hours. However, partly because of those realities, I would like to explicitly express my strong support for the Greenfield option. 

Anyone who has traveled in Europe knows what a huge boon high speed rail is when it links up major cities, it is an example that we would do well 

to follow here, and the Greenfield option is clearly the most logical and beneficial of the alternatives available.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an UGA staff member unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic 

during the travel hours necessary, but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am unable to attend the public open house on Tuesday but I strongly support this plan in general and the Greenfield option in particular. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to see this have a stop in Athens! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an UGA student unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to traffic during the travel hours necessary but I would 

like to explicitly express support for any option of the high-speed Atlanta-Charlotte railway. As a student from Atlanta relocating to Charlotte, I am 

passionate about this and am excited about the possibility of easier transportation from Atlanta to Charlotte!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and graduate student 

requirements. My partner lives in Athens with me but works in Atlanta, requiring obscene amounts of travel by car in order to facilitate his earnings 

and my education. This is a situation for many other citizens in Athens and Atlanta. I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD 

option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary. I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option. This rail would change a lot of people’s lives and 

give people numerous options for transportation. I have lived in Athens for 7 years and a rail line to Atlanta would have been incredibly convenient.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

We need high speed rail through Athens! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athens resident unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic 

during the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am a UGA student and would like to encourage building a train on the path through Athens (green) Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as a UGA student unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to support the Greenfield option that goes through Athens. Athens is the largest town between Atlanta and Greenville. It also contains 

the University of Georgia so should be on the rail line.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an UGA student unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic 

during the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I think that the initiative to develop high-speed rail between Atlanta and Charlotte is excellent and will have significant transit, environmental, 

health and safety, cultural, and economic benefits for the region. That said, I think that it is incredibly important the a route be chosen that serves 

Athens, GA as an intermediary stop. As a major population center, as well as academic and cultural hub, I believe that it would be a huge loss to the 

Athens community, to the tens of thousands that commute between Athens and Atlanta regularly, and the the greater Georgia political and 

economic community if Athens is not included along the constructed route. For this reason, I want to register to voice my strong support for the 

Greenfield route option!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting on Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option. We desperately need transportation 

alternatives (preferably passenger rail) between Athens and Atlanta.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD 

option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing as an Athenian unable to make it to the open house meeting Tuesday due to lacking public transportation and obscene traffic during 

the travel hours necessary but I would like to explicitly express support for the GREENFIELD option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe the fastest Charlotte to Atlanta corridor should be considered. I live near the Gaston County line, and every weekend I-85 is backed up as 

early as 3:00 with the traffic headed to Atlanta for the weekend. Traffic between the two cities would definitely benefit from the faster alternative.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

The option through athens would be the most ideal and give the most benefit to all, especially college students that would now have a way to get to 

atlanta without a car.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe the Greenfield route is the best route between CHARLOTTE and Atlanta as it is the fastest and the majority of people traveling will be from 

Charlotte or Atlanta.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/17/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the greenfield option is the best balance between price and service. It also provides lots of potential for TOD Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/17/2019 Web 

Comment

I’d love a train from atlanta to Athens. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/17/2019 Web 

Comment

A passsenger rail option to Athens (which has a decent public transit system) would bolster the ties between that somewhat removed part of the 

metro area and its university to Atlanta proper. Other cities along the Crescent line are closer to the cores of their respective metro areas

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/17/2019 Web 

Comment

Go through Athens! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/17/2019 Web 

Comment

The Athens connection would be very useful. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/17/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support the greenfield alternative as it supports much better travel times and potentially more trips per day. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/17/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield route appears to be the best balance of cost, speed and access. This is a very important route, it needs to be built yesterday. I would 

use it regularly.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/17/2019 Web 

Comment

JUST BUILD THE DAMN TRAINS. We need more transportation options, and connecting the piedmont region via passenger train will do tremendous 

things for the economy of all cities involved. I would prefer the Greenfield option, as including the city of Athens and the University of Georgia along 

the line would be important to the state, but realistically any option would be better than the current transportation infrastructure in the southeast 

US

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/14/2019 Web 

Comment

Only way i see this charlotte to atlanta mode if transport working is if its quick. Limited regional stops. With wait times similar to air travel, and 

approximate driving time door to door of 4 hours, the end to end of 2 hours is really the only one that makes sense. Therefore, Greenfield with 

electric dedicated track is the solution, or just a waste of time and money.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/12/2019 Web 

Comment

Please bring the rail through Athens, GA! It'd be a huge boon to our community and the economy of both Athens and Atlanta! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/12/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in full support of a passenger rail line that goes through Athens, GA and connects Charlotte to the northeast and Atlanta to the southwest. I 

have been waiting for this to happen for 25 years!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/11/2019 Web 

Comment

Hello. I am writing to indicate my support for the Greenfield approach. I need to travel from Washington DC to Athens fairly often through out the 

year and direct passenger rail would be an wonderful alternative. In addition, I have many friends and family that commute directly from Athens to 

Atlanta for work and this would greatly relieve the traffic burden. Further, I would like to add that I strongly support the use of electric over diesel 

wherever practicable, to reduce the reliance on fossil fuels.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

Written 

Comment

These public meeting are very valuable, and I hope there will be more. I strongly support the high-speed rail transportation and connecting regional 

cities without needing an automobile. Out of the various corridors, I support the Greenfield corridor the most. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

I like the Greenfield alternative the best because there are less curves and more potential for an electric train. Electric trains don't pollute the air 

and it would have a high impact on bus, car, and plane use, which do pollute the air. I feel like it would be best for the environment. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

Written 

Comment

I prefer the Greenfield corridor; directions to meeting were well done; probably need a bigger room

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
Written 

Comment

After looking over the current environmental impact study the Greenfield option makes the most sense to me. I really would support the expansion 

of high-speed rail from Atlanta to Charlotte, perferably using electric power. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

Written 

Comment

Out of the 3 links the Greenfield seems like the best option. It can travel at the highest speeds, is lower cost than the I-85 line, and impacts more 

commuters/travlers than the Southern Crescent line. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

As a Charlotte native, USA Grad, and Atlanta redsident I would love to see the Greenfield alternative. I am painfully familiar with I-85 and it's 

horrible. A high-speed rail is a green way to bring the southeast into the 21st century. Europe has proven a railway system is effective and will be 

well used. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

I think it'd be great to connect any high speed rail through Athens. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Key will be how populated this can be by 2050 - with 30 years of transportation impacts from ever-growing population, it will be important to 

markget this also as a commuter alternative - Athens to Atlanta

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

I support the Greenfield Corridor alternative throug Athens. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

The Greenfield option should be chosen due to it's higher potential for frequency, ridership, diverted travels, and electrification

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
Written 

Comment

I am deeply in support of electric Bellena trains for environmental reasons. I also support a route that passes through Athens and Dacula. Thank you. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

 Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review.

Written 

Comment

The Greenfield corridor seems to be the best Alternative. It combines lower cost, less infrastructure/city impacts, and provides the fastest route 

with the most revenue. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

This project should move forward. Either the Greenfield or I-85 corridor alternatives shold be used with electric trains on dedicated tracks. Of these 

two, the Greenfield alternative seems the better corridor alternative because it is a lower capital cost than the I-85 corridor alternative. It has 

greater projected ridership, and it serves GSP international airport. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

Written 

Comment

Preferred Alternative = Greenfield. Good start to this endeavour. I'm very excited to see this type of discussion and serious study devoted to HSR in 

the USA. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

As a resident of Charlotte without an automobile I'm excited about the aspect of traveling across the southeast at a reasonable convenience. I think 

that individuals in urban areas are likely to use this service more than rural areas, and making the travel time better or comparable to driving will 

bekey to boosting ridership. I think the Greenfield option is superior on these fronts. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Forget Crescent; Greenfield is best. You'll have to resist a lot of political pressure to include more stops - hang tough. Greenfield is more expensive - 

no problem, this is building for the future. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Greenfield seems to be the biggest bang for the buck and makes best use of current/future technologies. Please look at purchasing enough corridor 

ROW to include room/planning for a multi-use path/greenway like east coast greenway. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
Written 

Comment

Firstly, congratulations on getting this far, this is very encouraging. Do not even bother with the Southern Crescent. It is the cheapest alternative 

and also the least useful. 20th century technology. The Greenfield option is th emost attractive considering cost, ridership, technology and speed. By 

the time such a project a implemented, it has to be with new technology and try to compete with other regions of the country and world. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

I-85 route is too pricey so I vote "no." I advocate for any project that best creates private company ineterst. I'd like the Crescent corridor to have 

higher frequencies and factor in connecting to Piedmont Corridor service. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

The Greenfield Alternative makes the most sense, considering cost and speed. If this is going to happen let's be bold! Using the existing rail for the 

Southern Crescent Alternative doesn't seem to gain anything since speed would be so limited. The I-85 alternative is way more expensive. Go green!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Greenfield route is best. If you're going to do a project of this magnitude be bold and get in the 21st century with truly high speed rail. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Based on information presented prefer the Greenfield line. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

With the stated purpose and need, the Greenfield route is the most beneficial. With this benefit and the revenue/O&M cost, it seems the easiest to 

service supporters to finance. A close second choice would be the I-85 corridor. The benefit of this is that he public awareness would be greater 

once implemented due to the proximity of those commuting by automobile. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Go for green route - fast/cost ok

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

The green option seems the best one to me. 220 mph best, speed, connect the most populated areas and is "cheaper" to build than the red one. 

Way to go! 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

I like the Greenfield alternative - we should maximize ridership. I really want to see this happen in Greenville. Greenville should be included. It would 

make life easier for my family and cut down on pollution. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
Written 

Comment

Greenline - fastest travel time, least cost, plus redundancy for frequent line. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

I think that the Greenfield alternative has many cost related and economic development benefits that should be considered. I strongly support this 

as the best alternative. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

The Greenfield route should be chosen for the following reasons: More affordable route, less development in the area to have to build around; the 

area south of I-85 will be the high growth population areas over the next 50 years, prime area for urban village, economic generator around the few 

upstate stations, more opportunities to connect with high population areas and accessibilty by all of the upstate. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Court Reporter

I feel like this is a great opportunity for not just Atlanta but the entire Southeast region. I strongly urge for the Green Field option due to the 

revenue to cost and the speed which people can get from Atlanta to Charlotte. I think that we should move to phase 2 as early as possible.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Given the 3 corridor alternatives, the Greenfields option is the most appealing since the primary purpose of the rail should be to facilitate travel 

from CBD Charlotte to CBD Atlanta. However, a rail that serves as a hybrid between the Greenfields and I85 corridor options by having stops only 

in CBD Charlotte, Charlotte Airport, CBD Greenville, CBD Atlanta, and Atlanta Airport would seem to be a superior route.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a huge need and something that I would use often, so glad to see the Southeast striving to build up the public transit network. I drive from 

Greenville to CLT airport for cheaper/alternative flight options frequently. Opening Atlanta Airport to a convenient option via rail would be 

awesome. However, if you're actually going to invest the time and money into this project, do it right! No one is going to ride a train that poses no 

benefits over driving (i.e. time, convenience). The crescent route should be eliminated from consideration. Public transportation is only valuable if it 

is a better option than driving. Having an empty train running along side busy traffic is more detrimental to carbon emissions and environmental 

considerations than not having a train at all. The Crescent route would be under utilized because it would not be more convenient to ride.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

No one would ride the low crescent option. Do high speed or do not do the project at all. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe the I-85 and greenfield corridors are both viable options for the planning of a high-speed rail travel. I think these will be good economically, 

culturally and environmentally for the south East. I would also urge that additional investigation of alternative technologies like the maglev’s also be 

considered.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I’m a Greenville resident and I’m in favor of the I-85 Corridor plan or Greenfield Corridor plan. Both seem like a great way to improve the ATL-GVLCLT travel options and bring the residents of these three great cities closer together. My wife and I love visiting Atlanta and I know we would come 

more often if we could cut our travel time in half.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support high speed rail connecting Greenville to Atlanta and Charlotte. I support the Greenfield Corridor option and envision GSP growing 

as a vibrant transportation hub, leveraging ride hailing services to downtown. I could easily see myself using either the Greenfield route or the I-85 

Corridor route on a weekly or bi-weekly basis to either Atlanta or Charlotte. I see no value in the Southern Crescent route and cannot envision 

myself using that service at all.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Comment: I support the high-speed rail projects, specifically the I-85 and Greenfield plans. High-speed rail is a critical need across the Southeast. 

After reviewing the plans and information provided by the DOT, I believe the slower "Southern Crescent" approach using the Amtrak lines doesn't 

save enough time to be worth it to me as a commuter. I regularly have to travel by air for work, and it would lower overall environmental impact of 

my flights if I could train down to ATL (Hartsfield) and fly out rather than "hopping" out of GSP, which always requires two flights. It appears the I85 corridor offers the best mix of pros and cons for the project, providing a genuine high-speed rail alternative with the least overall impact on 

people and environment, on average.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I like the I-85 or Greenfield Corridor options. I would not go with the southern crescent option. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Please, do this and not on the current rail system. This has been needed for a long time. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I prefer the 1-85 or Greenfield Corridor. I'm split on the decision because I like the speed of the commute between ATL and Charlotte on the 

Greenfield but don't like the Greenville, SC location being the airport.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

1) This needs to happen 2) even though I would love for this to go through my town where I could walk to catch the train, prefer 85 or Greenfield 

route because it has to be faster than taking car or people won’t use it 3) best scenario would be to consolidate high speed and freight line in same 

corridor (85 or greenfield) allowing current crescent route to become a rail trail.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

After reviewing the documents I would be most in favor of either the I-85 or Greenway routes. Selecting the Southern Crescent route as the option 

to run the project on would be largely counterproductive as I don’t believe the reduced time on the train would make up for the only-slightly 

reduced time it would take to drive, thus lowering the potential client base. Furthermore, unless the high speed rail would operate differently than 

the Amtrak, it would be at high risk for significant delays on these tracks. These concerns are backed up by it being the only option that is projected 

to cost more in the long term than the revenue it generates. Because of these reasons I believe that the Southern Crescent would be a poor 

selection. I believe that either the I-85 or Greenway routes would be excellent additions and serve our communities well in bolstering growth and 

connectivity of our region. While the Greenway route is cheaper and a little faster, the extreme inconvenience of stopping at GSP make the better 

route the I-85 selection in my opinion, especially with Greenville’s lack of well-planned and utilized public transportation. The best option would be 

the I-85 option as it combines the important convenience factor of having a stop in Greenville proper with the speed of the Greenway. While it may 

be the most expensive, it is one of only two which is projected to generate more revenue than cost, meaning in time the cost could be recouped. 

Overall I find the high speed rail highly valuable and a project that must be pushed forward to become reality; however I feel that selecting the 

Southern Crescent route would be a folly and the I-85 route combines the best aspects of all without long-term financial issues.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Our company has office locations in Charlotte, Greenville, and Atlanta. We have many associates driving the I-85 corridor every week. The I-85 or 

Greenfield routes would reduce travel time and encourage utilization. If the end-to-end travel time is more than 3-3.5 hours, our associates would 

likely continue to drive. The shorter routes would reduce our travel time and expenses and promote growth within the region.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support the faster two options. The crescent line as presented nobody would use. This would be economically transformative for the 

region and be amazing.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I absolutely support this project. I would prefer either the greenfield alternative or the I-85 alternative. This would enable the youth the travel from 

Atlanta to Greenville to Charlotte easily, lessen the accidents, provide more access to jobs across the states and attract a higher population in the 

areas where the train will travel through. So many of my peers was excited after hearing this proposal!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I have a house within a 15 minute drive of the proposed Athens terminal and within about 25 minutes of the proposed Commerce terminal. From a 

personal perspective, either one would be convenient. (The train noise might be annoying depending on wind direction since my house is only 2-3 

miles from the proposed Athens line, but I am hard of hearing, so I don't care. ;-) )Since I am already 55 years old, and I assume that it will take 10-

20 years for the line to exist, I'm not personally likely to be a frequent customer. If it existed today, I might use it to commute to the Atlanta airport 

several times per year and to commute by rail on vacation a couple of times a year. The ATL airport competition is a $45/person shuttle van service 

from Athens which is just fine, or driving my own car and parking at ATL. By chance, I recently lived in Rochester NY for six years, and I took Amtrak 

to NYC a few times. I think Amtrak reached speeds around 110 MPH, so I assume it is similar to a couple of the proposals. It was a pleasant and 

affordable experience, BUT I chose to drive to NYC most of the time because driving and parking and tolls in NYC are cheaper than Amtrak IF more 

than one person is going. As a side note, the fact that high-speed Amtrak stopped in Rochester did not "rescue" the economy in Rochester. It has 

been a depressed area regardless of the rail terminal. The primary effect on the Rochester economy has been the decline of the local businesses of 

Kodak and Xerox, not rail access. In summary, my opinion is that either high-speed route between Atlanta and Charlotte is good, i.e. not the slowspeed Gainesville route which already exists for Amtrak. The long-term value comes from being an economically competitive commuter route, i.e. 

the best way for daily workers to commute from areas with cheap housing to areas with expensive housing. That means it must have terminals near 

Atlanta like Suwanee and Doraville. One other thought - the Atlanta area needs a second major airport. If the Athens airport were to become a 

significant commercial airport in the next fifty years, having a high-speed train terminal 10 miles away would be very useful. This scenario only 

makes sense if Athens becomes a "real" city in that time period with a "real" airport rather than being a pleasant college town. FYI, I used the train 

system in Japan throughout my business career - more than 100 trips there. I loved the Japan rail system. I think it works because it is the 

cheapest/fastest way for millions of daily commuters to get to work. Tens of millions of people live in a VERY small space. That is different from the 

USA.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Environmental considerations will be fully 

considered in the Tier 2 study.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I do not live in an area where I could attend one of the public meetings, but the impact of this rail system would be a huge benifit to me. If the red 

or green coorodor were selected it would allow me to travel to Atlanta and Charlotte much more safley, with a lower environmental impact, and 

way faster. With all of the communities growing out this way it would allow for much better commuter traffic, again reducing the environmental 

impact of so many cars on the road as well as saving countless lives that are lost on the roads. It would be so incredabley worth it to put this system 

in place, and would help both Atlanta and Charlotte grow in a more sustainable way.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Just a couple of thoughts, though I'll admit I am hardly educated on this subject. 1) Getting to Athens for football games via rail would be nice. 2) 

Students would also benefit from rail to Athens. 3) Not much of a fan of the Atlanta station being at Hartsfiled-Jackson, but I understand that would 

benefit a great many people. 4) Sure would be nice to alleviate some of the traffic on the north side of I-285. 5) Using the I-85 corridor would 

seem to minimize disruption of otherwise "un-developed" land. Going right up the middle of I-85 just seems to make sense. But could there be a 

spur to Athens?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Prefer one of the two faster options. This is a must do! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

The second two options of the higher speed trains would be very welcome. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Based on the information presented, I would like to voice support for both the I-85 and Greenfield corridors, based on both the capital costs and 

usability (travel times) of the proposed corridors. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
Written 

Comment

Publics meetings should have a short presentation before looking at charts. Corridor Alternatives - I prefer the red or green options (I-85 or 

Greenfield). 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Am in favor of either I-85 or Greenfield alternative. Key stops in the middle should include Greenville and GSP. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

As millennial and younger generations make a larger and larger % of the population there will be more and more pressure to complete this project 

as soon as possible. As a taxpayer I fully support a high speed rail line between Atlanta and Charlotte and would be willing to accept higher tax's to 

support the line. While I would prefer either the Greenfield or the I-85 corridor any option would be better than none. Focus should be on 

generating the lowest ticket cost and using green energy wherever possible. Also removing the environmental impact by using a train with an 

effective septic storage system so that waterways are not harmed/contaminated. Every effort should be made to be upfront and clear on both 

how the line will be funded and operated (private / public) as we move forward. What is the depreciation rate for the projects like these? 

Anticipated revenue? Finally is there a way to personally contribute to the process other than participating in the public

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Environmental considerations will be fully considered in a Tier 2 study. Modern trains have retention toilets so waterways won't be harmed. Extensive effort 

has already gone into the planning process that has been conducted to date, with a major focus on developing operating plans, estimating ridership/revenue, 

and estimating capital and operating cost. This work has identified the Atlanta-Charlotte corridor as having great potential as a high speed rail service. 

Funding for completion of the planning, final design, right-of-way acquisition, and purchase of trains has not been identified as yet. The analysis to date is 

pretty clear that, once constructed, fares will cover all operating costs, with a profit, as is common with high speed rail projects around the world. Thus, it is 

likely that a solicitation will identify a private operator to provide the service, with no operating support required. Readers are encouraged to read all of the 

project documents developed to date, posted on the project website.

Written 

Comment

Please select either the I-85 or Greenfield Corridor Alternatives. The Souther Crescent is hardly high speed and electric is superior to diesel in speed, 

environmental impact, and efficiency. While my best reason is cost in dollars, these impacts cannot be overlooked. Due to these high costs 

(particularly for I-85 and Greenfield) please use as few taxpayer dollars as possible so we are not burdened with the cost of such a project that may 

likely be drawn out for too long. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I love the Athens and Toccoa corridor options. That would either connect Atlanta to Lake Lanier or Athens, both of which would be hugely beneficial Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I support your high speed rail efforts. Do not use Crescent Route. No one will ride the train if they are going to a place at fast as they can drive 

there themselves. People only become interested in train travel when the speeds are 2 to 3 times faster than the average 60 MPH they get on the 

freeways. Therefore, I support the I 85 and Greenville Routes. Even though I don't live on the direct route of this plan, I know that this plan will 

eventually affect my life since I do live within 100 miles of this project. I would like to have other travel options other than just the plane, or drive 

myself to either Atlanta or Charlotte from Columbia to catch a cheaper flight. (Or anywhere else for that matter) Please consider in the future 

bringing a high speed line from either Greenville or Charlotte to Columbia, South Carolina. Columbia is home to Fort Jackson, one of the largest 

Army training bases, meaning a steady supply of income for the train from the Department of Defence. Also, connceting the High Speed Rail line 

from Columbia to Savannah, past Jacksonville to Coca Beach, Florida (along with the Charlotte to Washington DC plan and the current Acela/future 

Avelia Liberty train service) will create an intergrated High Speed Rail Line which will streach from Miami, Florida to Boston, Massachusetts. 

Finally, get an outside train line other than Amtrac to run this new line you are planning. Virgin Trains USA (which runs the Miami to West Palm 

Beach and soon Orlando/Tampa Bay), Renfe of Spain, SNCF of France, and JR Central of Japan would be acceptable. Not only would they be able to 

run the passenger service efficently, they would be able to speed up construction and save money for the taxpayers. Thank you for your time and 

good luck with your three meetings. Todd A. Bridge

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a 

national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors. Funding for completion of the planning, final design, right-of-way acquisition, and purchase of trains has not 

been identified as yet. The analysis to date is pretty clear that, once constructed, fares will cover all operating costs, with a profit, as is common with high 

speed rail projects around the world. Thus, it is likely that a solicitation will identify a private operator to provide the service, with no operating support 

required.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a great idea. Tie this in with Athens due to high population/university area. Also tie in with Amtrak location at some point to extend possible 

destinations.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

 The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a 

national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

I want high speed rail to DC. The I-85 option seems terrible from the rider perspective, because the view would be of 85. That’s very unappealing. I 

like the Crescent route due to capital costs and how quickly it could be used, but I wish the speeds could be higher and passenger rail was prioritized 

over freight. The Greenfield option seems best, though I’d prefer if it stopped in Clemson, Greenville, and Spartanburg (preferably downtown). I am 

concerned about environmental and social impact but do not understand the potential effects well enough to speak to that.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

 An important part of the Purpose for the Atlanta-Charlotte project is its role as a key part of the Southeast Corridor to Washington DC, conncting there to the 

Northeast Corridor. The optimum operating plan, including whether trips through to DC will require a change of trains, will be made in later stages of the 

Project Development process. A Service Development Plan (SDP) was not developed for this Tier 1 EIS, but will be developed during a future Tier 2 

environmental review, and will outline how the proposed high-speed rail service will be operated, dispatched and maintained. Similarly, environmental 

considerations will be fully considered in the Tier 2 study.
10/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I want to support the Greenfield alternative as the best route option due to its potential for electrification, economic development, and integrating 

car-dependent cities without any type of rail service. The ROI and B/C for the Greenfield alternative are also compelling reasons to commit to this 

alternative as opposed to the others. I am concerned about the Atlanta MMPT station that is assumed in the documents. The Gulch area where 

that project was envisioned to exist has been sold to private developers, and there is unknown if they will leave enough room for passenger rail 

corridors -- especially as there would need to be room for this project, the Atlanta-Chattanooga HSR line, and regional commuter rail. I would like to 

know if GDOT or the FRA have plans to engage the private developers to set aside ample room for rail service, or if viable alternatives for a 

Downtown Atlanta station are being considered.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

This Tier 1 EIS considers the formerly proposed Georgia MMPT as one potential station location in Downtown Atlanta, although other opportunities may be 

explored during a Tier 2 analysis. The Georgia MMPT project was listed in the Atlanta MPO’s Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) while this Tier 1 EIS was 

being prepared; however, it has since been removed from the LRTP due to recent changes in property ownership in Downtown Atlanta.

9/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Can't make the meeting, but wanted to encourage the use of the Greenfield alternative for future study in the Tier 2. I make this recommendation 

on the basis of speed, reliability, cost, and projected usage. If this comment carries over to the Tier 2, I would encourage the removal of the 

Roebuck and CLT airport stations. I make this recommendation on the basis of overall end-to-end route time, and the closeness (and therefore 

duplicity) of the CLT and Gateway stations. Good luck getting more funding!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Greenfield route. Suggest a station just in a GA (Hartwell) instead of Anderson. Same dynamics but potentially less expensive and opens up NE GA 

for growth. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the Greenlink line would be the best idea because it combines cost effectiveness with shortened travel times. With that said, could this be 

made as an expandable line so that in the future spur lines could be added on (ie. a line from GSP through Greenville to Clemson)? If the possibility 

of expansion is included in the planing it will make said expansion more cost effective in the future.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. It would be possible to add branches from the 

main Atlanta-Chalotte line in the future.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I love the idea of high speed rail connecting Atlanta to Charlotte... and further along into the High Speed Rail corridor. I think that the greenfield 

alignment would serve more people in a better fashion—assuming that the Crescent would continue its traditional route. If the Crescent would be 

discontinued, then the alignments following the CSX/ Crescent alignment would best serve the community. Question: could there be plans for a fork 

somewhere along the line to Athens and then loop back into the alignment? This way, in the future, with rise in frequency, trains could alternate 

Gainesville/ Athens alignments?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

With the rapidly growing population and infamous highway traffic around Atlanta (especially the I-85), we need a high speed rail solution for the 

state to thrive. The Atlanta-Charlotte passenger rail route is ambitious, and I support pursuing it. This route will relieve the most congested highways 

and airport in the country, making way for economic growth for the entire region. For corridor alternatives, I support the Greenfield project. The 

obvious reason can be seen in the graphic given in the Phase I screening results: the best results among all alternatives. A critical component 

however is in the number of round trip trains per day. Everybody has a different schedule, and providing people flexibility will open up train travel to 

many more people than projected. Flights require getting to the airport (and dealing with traffic), security, and flying at set times during the day. 

Driving is available 24/7, but your mileage will vary wildly. Frequent high speed trains are just right: a solution that is not too limited to a timetable, 

but easy to access. Finally, on train technology. Electrified rail is the gold standard, but even a higher-speed diesel option on the Greenfield for 

now would be acceptable. The key is a mostly dedicated passenger route to be built. Once the system has proven itself, electrification may become 

easier to justify, and perhaps even desirable to those worried about cost. I look forward to the ROD (hopefully for Greenfield), and thank you for 

your time! I hope to see the DOT find the resources to pursue the Tier 2 EIS, and to see it break ground!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

Please keep us advised regarding the cost and corridor location that is selected. I would vote for the Greenfield Corridor, but I have witnessed major 

cost overruns on projects like these when I lived in Denver, Colorado. I have serious doubts that the cost estimated for each corridor is accurate. I 

expect to see the costs double, once the route is selected. How and who is paying for this project?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Comment: I commute heavily in Atlanta, and I also work in financial services with ties to Charlotte and a particular focus on economic valuation of 

public infrastructure. Having reviewed the high-level data, it seems the Greenfield Corridor Alternative is unequivocally the best choice, weighing 

environmental, social, and economic value, with the I-85 path second and Southern Crescent a distant third. In addition, I believe this project 

should consider electric power vehicles more heavily (as opposed to diesel powered trains) when accounting for infrastructure longevity and the 

integration of a full Southeastern transit network. Question: 1) What is the current plan for the Cost-Benefits Analysis in weighing environmental 

costs, social costs, capital costs, etc? 2) When appropriate, where can information on outside specialists and third-party contractors hired for this 

project/data be found?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. The Tier 2 Study will include a thorough analysis of environmental, social, and capital costs. Firms selected to perform consultant 

service can be found on the project website or requesting that information from the project sponsor.Use revised standard response. 

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing to support the Greenfiled option. A high speed rail will greatly increase accessibility and decrease costs and carbon emissions. Such a 

wonderful stimulus for the southeast!!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I would very much like a railway between Athens and Charlotte, but what are the environmental implications? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. A high level analysis of environmental impacts 

is included in the FEIS/ROD. A much more thorough analysis will be performed in the Tier 2 EIS. A high level analysis of environmental impacts is included in 

the FEIS/ROD. A much more thorough analysis will be performed in the Tier 2 EIS.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield route is preferable. In addition to the logical link with the University of Georgia, the Greenfield route would have less impact on our 

state's beautiful Blue Ridge Mountain areas.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Environmental considerations will be fully 

considered in the Tier 2 study.

Court Reporter

The reason I want to propose the Green Line against the other two is, Number 1, it is going to carry the most people by going through Athens. The 

educational system will be tied to the Atlanta universities. It will also pull in the Greenville/Spartanburg area with the terminal there, and continue 

up to Charlotte. This line will be a superior route to the others because of the topography and wetlands. It also has less intrusion from real estate 

development. It is more remote in its layout. Therefore, it would be a lot less expensive to build this line, less intrusive to the environment to build 

this line, and be a lot quicker to build this line without having to wait on the studies and so forth. Both of the other lines go through major wetlands, 

higher topography and higher real estate costs due to development. So if you look at all the factors, it is very easy to see why the Green Line would 

be the superior route for rapid rail. This line can connect all the major centers which is Athens, Greenville, Spartanburg and Charlotte to Atlanta. If 

you want more bang for your bucks, Athens needs to be tied to Atlanta.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Environmental considerations will be fully 

considered in the Tier 2 study.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe the Greenfield route will be the best option. It has the best travel time (especially if the electric option is selected) and the optimal capital 

cost (relative to the overall performance of the route). The Athens stop I think will be a key factor in the route's potential success. I also think the 

use of the electric train will be key, as it significantly reduces the travel time.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I'm very excited about this project, and I very strongly believe in the necessity to build a high speed rail network for more efficient, accessible and 

eco-friendly travel. That being said, I strongly feel (regardless of costs) that investing in a diesel powered rail line would be a huge mistake. I fully 

support this project if electric powered trains are used. Not only is it imperative that we move away from dependency on fossil fuels, but I also find 

it harder to believe people would see it as a viable alternative to driving or flying given the slower travel times. The extra 45 minutes to an hour 

could be enough to convince people to consider other modes of transportation. I also highly support the Greenfield route. I don't see how the 

Southern Crescent route could be considered viable since it has the lowest revenue and highest travel time. I understand that it has the lowest 

capital cost, but I can't wrap my head around why we should invest in something that isn't any more efficient (time wise) than driving or flying. 

The Greenfield route makes the most sense in my opinion. Overall travel time is the lowest and the capital cost is about half that of the I-85 route. I 

know there are so many other factors at play, but at half the capital cost of the I-85 route with a higher expected ridership and revenue and slower 

travel time, this just makes sense to me. I also don't really believe we should be too concerned with upfront costs of investing in something so 

important to our future (efficient, environmentally friendly, accessible transportation). As for the environmental impact comparison, it's hard for 

me to have any definitive opinions since the impacts aren't very clearly quantified or explained. Maybe I'll have a stronger opinion come Tier 2. 

Thank you!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. As noted in the comment, a more indepth analysis of the environmental impacts would occur in a Tier 2 environmental review. 
10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of the Greenfield route. The Greenfield route is mid priced yet it is a better deal than I-85 since it has a slightly higher projected 

ridership, faster top speed which means less travel time (both the electric and diesel options are faster than the counterpart), has an electric option 

which is important for the environment, and has the lowest projected environmental impact. Also, it would probably be much easier to do the 

Greenfield since it could be quite hard to find areas on I-85 to bring the rail through since certain parts are really developed. I think the Greenfield 

route is better than the Southern Crescent because, though it is slightly more expensive, the Greenfield route is better in every category. It cuts the 

travel time in half and multiplies the projected ridership by 6. It also doesn't operate at a huge deficit and has an electric option, unlike the Southern 

Crescent, making it better for the environment.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review, as will a more in-depth analysis of the Project's environmental impacts.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I am writing in support of the Atlanta to Charlotte passenger rail corridor plan. I think that the Greenfield Corridor is the best option, as it connects 

through Athens, GA, and has the shortest travel time. The Greenfield Corridor also will have the lowest costs and highest potential ridership, 

especially due to the creation of an Athens-to-Atlanta passenger railway, which has been sorely needed. Connecting these two cities will bring great 

prosperity to each of them. I also want to implore GDOT to please look forward and construct an electric-only line. In Europe, there is hardly a single 

diesel passenger train. To construct this corridor as a diesel line is looking backwards, not forwards, and will cause significant environmental damage 

across the line, on top of the increased costs and loss of reliability and efficiency. An electric-only line will have the additional beneficial outcome of 

reducing billions of tons of CO2 that would otherwise be generated from single-passenger vehicular travel between these cities.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review, as will a more in-depth analysis of the Project's environmental impacts.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Dear Scott, I read the press release titled “Public Comment Sought on Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor” and thought this was an 

interesting topic for me to comment on both personally and professionally as a citizen of Atlanta but working mostly in Charlotte. I believe the 

addition of a true high-speed rail system between the two cities will be beneficial to travelers because of convenience, time and cost savings over 

current rail, driving and flying options. Overall, this project has the potential to set a new standard for high speed passenger service in the United 

States. As it stands, I would rarely consider the current Amtrak rail option between Atlanta and Charlotte. Amtrak runs only one train per day 

between these locations and the pickup or drop-off times are at 2:45am or 1:00am depending on which city you originate. Furthermore, the journey 

takes over five and a half hours each way compared to four hours in a car. Lastly, Amtrak’s ticket costs of $120 round trip1 is more expensive than 

driving at $50 round trip. 2 The alternative option of flying between two of the nation’s busiest airports also poses a number of problems. To start, 

travelers generally dread the experience that comes with flying (i.e. overhead bag dilemmas, turning off cellphones, TSA security screenings, 

uncomfortable seats, high altitude exhaustion, etc). Additionally, flying saves only a marginal amount of time than driving when you factor in the 

TSA lines, boarding process, and commute to end destinations. Most importantly, flying is costly, with tickets ranging between $160 and $400 

depending on how far in advance you book. 3 This is where high speed rail comes into play because it is timely, cost competitive, and provides a 

better experience than air. Under the proposed study, a high-speed rail journey along the proposed I-85 or Greenfield corridors would take less than 

three hours- almost an hour savings from a car. Additionally, it is cost competitive with tickets costing somewhere between $60-$75 per trip.4 

Furthermore, the I-85 or Greenfield options would have 14-22 daily round trips which provides more than the 11 flights offered to air travelers 

today. Lastly, travel by train is easier than driving and flying because you have the freedom to walk around while on board, and you have a large seat 

from which to relax or catch up on those emails – with no interruption for takeoff and landing. While both I-85 and Greenfield corridors sound like 

good options, I believe we should design for electric trains instead of diesel and to set a new standard in the United States. Currently the fastest 

train in the U.S. is the Acela, an electric train between Wilmington, DE and Baltimore, MD with 150MPH top speeds. Electric trains on the proposed I85 and Greenfield corridors would beat the Acela’s record with top speeds of 180MPH and 220MPH respectively. While this is certainly a potential 

record breaker in the U.S. in terms of top speed and is consistent with top speeds in the rest of the world, I believe we should be looking at ways to 

increase the average speed between Charlotte and Atlanta. The proposed routes have average speeds of only 100MPH or 133MPH, which is far less 

than other high speed rail networks. China’s Beijing to Shanghai route, for example, has average speeds of almost 200MPH even when considering 

stops in between.2 By conforming to Chinese Standards, we could reduce our travel time down to 1.5 hours between Atlanta to Charlotte, which 

would clearly make high speed rail the mode of choice. Opponents to the idea of high speed rail might make the argument that the system is a 

great burden to the tax payer. However, you can find examples of profitable high speed rail in other countries. A recent article touted that the 

217MPH rail line from Beijing to Shanghai has become even more profitable by percentage than Apple.6 This is a true example that passenger rail 

can make money if it is convenient for travelers. Another counter-argument to the tax issue is that the interstate highway system must take in 

billions of subsidies each year to cover the shortcomings of fuel taxes. In summary, if we want to improve our transportation system for the future, 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Please develop the route that includes athens. Didn’t know of a public open house in athens area. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses GDOT and FRA selected meeting locations based on major population centers 

identified along the proposed project corridor. Future meetings for the public will be included as part of a Tier 2 environmental review, if a sponsor and a 

funding source are identified to advance the development of the Preferred Alternative. 
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I think that Athens would support this project. Hub for several small towns & UGA. As I understand it, Material indicates some of infrastructure 

already in place. Since Athens is potential placement I do think we should have Public Hearing here.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. GDOT and FRA selected meeting locations 

based on major population centers identified along the proposed project corridor. Future meetings for the public will be included as part of a Tier 2 

environmental review, if a sponsor and a funding source are identified to advance the development of the Preferred Alternative. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I am very in favor of the high speed rail to charlotte. I prefer the greenfield alternative due to cost time and ridership. I believe that the Tucker 

approach could be cheaper with more greenfield but I also believe that this needs to intercalate with a MARTA station in Tucker. Possibly this could 

also take a route that adds benefit to both the Emory and UGA campuses. I also believe that this opens a possiblity of a future secondary airport for 

Atlanta in the area between Tucker and Athens or expansion of Briscoe Gwinnett airport or Athens Ben Epps airport or a New alternative. Rail and 

Air need to be connected for a seamless transition both on the interstate side and the local sides.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. The potential of operating commuter rail trains 

from Tucker into Atlanta sharing track with trains from Charlotte could be included in the analysis of the Atlanta approach.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

A huge YES from me for high speed rail between Atlanta and Charlotte. Specifically, I am advocating for the Greenfield line. There is a huge need to 

connect Atlanta and Athens. It will improve traffic during typical rush hour times but also on game days, either in Atlanta or Athens. That is, more 

people could ride a train to Athens for a UGA event and vice versa, people in and around Athens could take the train into Atlanta for sporting 

events, concerts, etc. I cannot stress enough that regardless of which line you choose to proceed with (Greenfield, Interstate, or Crescent), the 

trains HAVE TO connect to Marta TRAINS. Please listen to me when I say this. People are not going to ride a train that takes them to the existing 

Amtrak station on Peachtree street and then get on a Marta bus. They have to be able to directly connect to a Marta Train, if you want people to 

actually use any new rail line. Proof of this can be seen in any region of the country or the world where rail is actually used. You have such a good 

opportunity here to create a really useful and well used rail line. Don't mess it up!!! Bring in behavioral scientists if you want to truly understand 

how people will use the trains.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Coordination with MARTA will be an imporant 

part of the analysis of the Atlanta approach.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield Corridor seems to make the most sense seems it links Athens with the Atlanta Area. 1.) Athens already has a multi-modal 

transportation center downtown. 2.) Athens is not served with an interstate type highway liking it to anywhere. 3.) Highway 316 is a joke. 4.)The 

sheer number of football fans would pay off the cost rapidly. 5.) If linked with MARTA it would allow the many Athens area to Atlanta commuters a 

viable way to get downtown. I have used Chicago's L many times and cannot express how wonderful it is to board the train in Aurora to go straight 

downtown to within site of the Willis Tower.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Coordination with MARTA will be an imporant 

part of the analysis of the Atlanta approach.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to express my support for the GREENFIELD option. It appears from the graphic that there are stops in Suwanee as well as Doraville that 

connect to the Greenfield route which I believe is critical as they have attempted to get MARTA in Gwinnett for years. That is where I grew up and 

where my mother still lives and there are a number of transplants to Athens that make that journey through Gco/ATL often. I would like to attend 

the meeting but may be unable due to traffic at that hour getting from Athens.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. The potential of operating commuter rail trains 

from Tucker into Atlanta sharing track with trains from Charlotte could be included in the analysis of the Atlanta approach.
Written 

Comment

I am a big fan of the Greenfield route. Please work w/CSX on the Clifton Corridor and MARTA and the Beltline for the northern arc of the city. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Coordination with MARTA will be an important 

part of the analysis of the Atlanta approach.

Court Reporter

Basically I want to say that I am excited about these corridor options. From examining the three major options, I think the Green Line has the most 

potential. It serves the most underserved routes out of the options. I believe that there is a significant potential ridership that would use it routinely, 

including myself. I think the Doraville station alternative, out of the options, would also be useful for commuters in the local regions to Atlanta, due 

to its proximity to the MARTA train station.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Coordination with MARTA will be an important 

part of the analysis of the Atlanta approach.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of the Greenfield alignment. This will, according to the information presented, be the fastest and also encourage growth in the areas 

along the route which is greatly needed. I also see this as the first step in this area toward High-Speed Rail for the New York (possibly Boston) to 

New Orleans AMTRAK Crescent route. Hopefully, the Northern and Southern extensions to the Greenfield alignment can be added in the relatively 

near future. Additionally, I would like to see added High-Speed Rail from the Southern end (Atlanta Airport) of the Greenfield alignment going to 

Macon, splitting to Savannah and Orlando and possibly to Jacksonville. I had understood from previous media articles that a Metro Atlanta 

MARTA/Bus/Train terminal would be built at at/near an existing MARTA station South of Five Points. Will this be a stop on the Greenfield alignment 

or will the MARTA/Bus/Train terminal be moved to the Atlanta Airport? I am a booster for High-Speed Rail, especially for relatively short trips up to 

400 - 500 miles and for leasurly longer trips, even cross-country, and look forward to seeing the High-Speed Rail project completed.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project.The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a national 

rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors. Current planning, to be confirmed in the planned Tier 2 analysis is that there would be both a downtown and an 

airport station in Atlanta. Coordination with MARTA will be an important part of the analysis of the Atlanta approach. It should be noted that high-speed rail 

and long distance trains can share the same track, as in the Northeast Corridor.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I applaud this effort by GDOT. High-speed rail has the potential to transform our state. I envision routes from Atlanta to Charlotte, Atlanta to 

Savannah (this would be incredible), Atlanta to Augusta, and Atlanta to Chattanooga. In terms of the proposed route, I really think a route to 

Athens is needed, but the Crescent corridor that serves Gainesville, Toccoa, Greenville, and Charlotte will help more people - especially in the 

overcrowded I-85 area.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. TThe Federal Railroad Administration has developed a 

national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1.The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe that rail transportation is a must for the future transportation needs of our nation. Rail transportation would make travel between Athens 

and Atlanta or Savannah easier, safer and quicker.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a national 

rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love for this to happen. But it needs to be sooner rather than later. We also need to have a stop in Greenville. I like the electrified Greenfield 

option the most but the stop for GSP should be closer to Greenville or, if it’s at GSP then there will need to be much more parking developed. I’m 

interested to know what 3rd party companies would be running this if the states didn’t? I’d also like to know how likely it would be that the federal 

government cover the cost? And if they only cover a portion of costs, where will the additional funding come from and how will that be broken up 

between the states and tax payers? Additionally, I’d like or know when do you all realistically think the line will be open for use?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The cost of transportation projects is typically divided between captial and operating costs. The analysis conducted in this FEIS/ROD indicates that the AtlantaCharlotte project would be expected to cover operating costs. Capital costs are typically shared between federal and state governments, with the proportion 

paid by each for passenger rail projects varying considerably. Currently, there are high-speed rail projects in exceptionally good markets in Florida and Texas, 

where right-of-way acquisition, design, and construction are being sponsored by private, for profit firms. In any case completion of environmental analysis, 

design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction would take several years.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Will there be 'express' options for the greenfield route (my preference)? It seems like there are about 3-5 too many stops on any of the alternatives, 

and the GSP airport seems to add quite a bit of distance to the route as well.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Appendix B Section 5.7.2: Alternative Stopping Patterns and Schedules provides information regarding stopping patterns for express and local trains 

considered in the Tier 1 EIS analysis. Schedules and stopping patterns will be evaluated further in a future Tier 2 environmental review. 

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the high-speed-rail between Atlanta and Charlotte because it links two of the biggest cities in the Southeast, and will be an important link 

when combined with planned high-speed line between Charlotte and Washington, and the existing high-speed corridor between Washington and 

Boston.I prefer the Greenfield alternative, because it appears to offer the shortest trip times and the highest ridership and it is less expensive than 

the I-85 p[topm/

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

An important part of the Purpose for the Atlanta-Charlotte project is its role as a key part of the Southeast Corridor to Washington DC, conncting there to the 

Northeast Corridor. The optimum operating plan, including whether trips through to DC will require a change of trains, will be made in later stages of the 

Project Development process. 

Written 

Comment

Favor Greenfield Corridor/Electrified/220 MPH. However, must continue to provide Amtrack service on Southern Crescent Corridor for "Crescent" 

train/diesel/110 mph, plus several added daytime trains serving Atlanta/Charlotte as well as downtown Greenville/Spartanburg and intermediate 

stops. Try fall back position if high-speed proves too experience is to maintain existing crescent service, place several new added daytime Amtrack 

trains on the existing railroad corridor/Atlanta to Charlotte additional track. Can be added to accommodate NS freight trains at far less than the cost 

of a new high-speed corridor. The overnight Crescent could shift to the new line and Amtrak could be the operator of the high-speed rail service.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. It would not be financially feasible to construct 

both the Greenfield high-speed rail route and the improvements to the the existing NS railroad to be able to accommodate increased passenger train service 

without unduly intefering with freight operations. The overnight Crecent could shift to the new line and Amtrak could be the operator of the high-speed rail 

service. 
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Strongly support high-speed rail Atlanta->Charlotte through Athens, GA. Please choose this route and send me info about how I can help with 

grassroots organizing for the votes. Unable to attend public meetings due to prior commitments.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. It is not clear at this time what public 

participation needs/opportunities there will be as the Project advances.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I’m very concerned about the capital cost, community impact and eminent domain for the I-85 option. For example around exit 27 on I-85 you have 

the BOSCH plant on one side of the interstate and now TTI building their North America headquarter on the other side. Would the rail system be 

built up here or would it be necessary to go into urban areas? Seams to me that the Greenfield line is the best long term option when it comes to 

profit, operating cost, efficiency and also gives the state of SC the opportunity to built a high-speed electric rail system that will be state of the art, 

fast (bragging rights) that will attract more international manufacturing businesses and jobs.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

A track to and from Charlotte to Atlanta through Athens would be great if and only if it was set up as an affordable method of public transportation 

for daily commuting. If the concept of this train is for purposes such as Amtrack which is extremely unaffordable and does not run often enough to 

be used as commuting transportation from many cities, then it is not worth the time, construction damage, or money. If this is designed to ease the 

burden of housing and traffic in Atlanta while making the region more acceptable, then it would be wonderful. As a student in Athens, I am highly 

limited to internships and jobs that do no reach into ATL traffic, however, a train like this would provide greater opportunities for students, families, 

and simply working adults who do not have time or money to extend their life any closer to ATL though more opportunities may exist there.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. The Atlanta approach of the Charlotte highspeed rail route could also accommodate commuter rail service with affordable fares for local travel within the segment south of Athens.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

High-speed rail would reduce emissions, reduce clogs on I-85, and keep inexperienced/aged drivers off the roads. There are many people who live in 

the Charlotte area and commute to Atlanta and vise versa. I split my residence between the Atlanta area (75%) and Rock Hill, SC (25%). Please do 

not use the Crescent route. Amtrak is outdated and inefficient. No one takes the train because it takes longer than driving. Along I-85 sounds so 

expensive, and would likely further clog-up the interstate. How many people's homes and neighborhoods would be disrupted by the "greenfield" 

option? It sounds like the best option. If those areas could be adequately compensated and relocated to a comparable neighborhood, we should go 

for that. High speed rail would help me so much. It's time we caught up to Japan and Europe and reduce our dependence on cars.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Further environmental surveys and reporting will be conducted to ensure all impacts to the quality of life for the natural and built environments are fairly 

evaluated and kept as a part of the project record. Additionally, avoidance, minimization, and mitigation efforts will also be utilized for anticipated impacts to 

the resources along the corridor. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I think that the Greenfield is the option we should pursue hardest. The difference in time is well worth the cost spent over the Crescent. The I85 

route is too much more expensive than the greenfield and is slower. We want to be investing in infrastructure that can support tomorrows 

technology not infrastructure that is limited to yesterdays. The diesel options are too slow to make it a truly impactful transit option. Being able to 

be in Charlotte in just over 2hrs is competitive with flying once you take TSA into consideration. There are a lot of people who live in Athens and 

commute to Atlanta, this would easily take all of those cars off of the road. I cannot support Greenfield enough. Please let me know how I can help 

push it more.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. Supporters are encouraged to contact elected officials.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

The Electric Greenfield Line has the most benefit and would be a welcome addition for most people. It would allow much needed connectivity, while 

creating jobs, eliminating traffic, reducing pollutants, and generating revenue. Connecting to Athens would also help college kids to get back home 

safely and quickly, as well as limiting the ATL to Athens traffic on local highways when there is a Bulldogs game. Please move this forward. I will 

pledge my support on the local level in my community. Please contact me with updates and opportunities to assist on the local level. I am a Civil 

Designer and Project Manager.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

 Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. 

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Please do not choose the amtrack option, it would take just as long to drive and nobody would choose rail over car if it's just as easy. Choose the 

high speed option, otherwise don't even bother. If we're going to spend time, money and effort on a project like this then PLEASE let's build a highspeed train and catch up with the rest of the world using high-speed rail.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I fully support alternative transportation options along the I-85 corridor. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be 

provided on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I live in Tucker and I think a high speed train is an excellent idea! I have family in Anderson, SC, Charlotte, NC, and Washington, DC. Having this train 

nearby would make travel so much easier and faster. I think using the I-85 corridor is the best option and maybe connect to other corridors in future.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be 

provided on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. An important part of the Purpose 

for the Atlanta-Charlotte project is its role as a key part of the Southeast Corridor to Washington DC, conncting there to the Northeast Corridor. The optimum 

operating plan, including whether trips through to DC will require a change of trains, will be made in later stages of the Project Development process. 

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Cast my vote for the I-85 rail route Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Anderson route Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be 

provided on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

The red line directly through Greenville and S.burg makes the most sense - If this is to be "mass transit", why not through the greatest "mass" of 

people instead of skirting these cities through the smaller towns and cities? It would help to alleviate the growing traffic snarl along I-85 through 

GSP

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to have a high speed train pass through Anderson on the route from Charlette and Atlanta! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be 

provided on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I-85 route thru Anderson SC Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

It would be great if this could happen. Following the I-85 corridor makes more sense to me. There are rail lines active and inactive to the east of the 

Interstate in Anderson County. This would cut down on auto driving to both Atlanta and Charlotte if we could have a station nearby.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Prefer the I-85 rail system Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

vote for route I85 / 2.5 hr trip Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support I-85 alternative. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

Route 2 Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

Please do not further consider the Greenfield option through/near Simpsonville. This would have a dramatically negative affect on our way of life, 

safety and property values. It makes more sense to follow 85 and/or the rail lines already in place as in the other options.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

This Tier I EIS performed a desktop-level review of environmental impacts that would result from this Project and did not perform any fieldwork as part of this 

study. A future Tier 2 study will perform a detailed review, including performing fieldwork, to determine any environmental impacts that result from the 

Project. FRA and the Project Sponsor will work with stakeholders to develop appropriate mitigation strategies for any environmental impacts that result from 

the Project. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide the 

development of the study. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study. 

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

To minimize impact on the environment, I think the Interstate 85 route may be the best one. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

Option 2 or 3 with stops in Anderson Co would be awesome! Anderson and Clemson residents and surrounding areas would surely use it! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be 

provided on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I would support the I-85 Corridor alignment that has as few stops as possible to maximize speed. Preferably in city centers. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I would prefer new track along the I-85 corridor. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I currently live on the west side of Anderson county and commute to Greenville daily for work. I think the i5 corridor route proposed could be an 

excellent resource for daily commuters such as myself. Having this as an option would help financially support this mode of public transportation, 

give a more environmentally friendly option to commuters, promote growth to an area with abundant outdoor resources, and hopefully alleviate 

traffic on hwy 85. This route seems like a great route and I would be very excited to see it chosen as this project moves forward.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

The I-85 route is most appealing to us because of the speed and access to GSP for parking and convenience. The high number of proposed riders is 

impressive, too. If you build it, they will come.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of the I-85 corridor route for the new high speed rail. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of the most direct route for high speed rail along I-85 Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I wholeheartedly support a high speed railway between Atlanta and Charlotte. My preference would be to follow the I-85 corridor as that would 

open up so many positive benefits, including alleviating traffic in that corridor, if stations were set up to feed area residents who drive in but could 

now train in. I personally would utilize the train often to go to both cities, Atlanta and Charlotte, to visit friends/relatives, as well as to get to work. I 

feel it would be incredibly beneficial to so many people within the region.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

i like i85 corridor Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the I-85 corridor is the best route and that there should be a stop in Spartanburg County Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the project, specifically the I85 route. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

85 not Greenfield Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

To properly prepare for future growth, the proposed I-85 corridor would greatly improve travel between Atlanta and Charlotte. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I-85 Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I favor the I-85 route but whatever route it takes it needs to connect all 3 airports. ATL-GSP-CLT. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be 

provided on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I prefer the I-85 alternative. I think it absolutely necessary to have a stop in Greenville, to allow commuting and access to Greenville businesses Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Comment: The best route is the I - 85 corridor. The project must began quickly and completed in the short term, not phased in. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I am very supportive of the project. I think the I85 alternative would be the most effective alternative in that it's the faster alternative to upgrading 

the existing crescent line and people travelling on the interstate would see it and it would make them more likely to switch transportation modes.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Prefer I-85 Corridor route Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

The Green option would insanely invade a growing residential area near 5 forks that is already over congested with little view of future relief. Using 

the interstate with depots at airports makes the best sense. Ride view would be mundane but it would have to be more practical and cost effective 

to utilize an already established traveling corridor.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

From the perspective of bringing relative value to the greater Greenville area, the i-85 corridor route would be preferable. It provides the best 

accessibility for residents living in the rapidly developing communities of Mauldin and Simpsonville

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love the I-85 route option. My husband and I live in downtown Greenville and work in Spartanburg. Additionally, we have numerous friends 

that live in Atlanta and visit 1-2 weekends a month. Finally, we tend to drive to the Marta station in Chamblee and take the Marta to the ATL airport 

when we fly. The I-85 route would significant cut down on our driving and traffic!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I prefer the 85 route option. And I think electric is the only reasonable option. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I vote for the I-85 corridor train. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I-85 corridor is preferable in my area to Enoree River or 5 forks. Thank you Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I feel that for the Atlanta to Charlotte option - you must consider the population hubs - Greenville/Spartanburg in the middle of this route. The cost 

for the I-85 seemed to be higher but long term this would appear to benefit the sustainability of the project. The growth of the GSP area - airport 

options for travel - and job collaboration opportunities would be significant. The other two routes are just not convenient for the population hub. I 

think the project must have central stops in the metro area of Greenville for sure.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I feel that the I-85 corridor route makes the most sense for the proposed high-speed rail. It is faster than the Crescent, which I feel most people 

wouldn't take as it is a significantly longer route than driving. The I-85 route runs through more major city areas where more people would take the 

rail.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I-85 Corridor seems to be a better option. It would be amiss not to stop in/near downtown Greenville - a key city that has helped the connectivity 

between Charlotte and Atlanta. Greenville/Spartanburg/Anderson also directly and indirectly helps fuel the growth of the entire area. While it is the 

most expensive option, it also is the most forward thinking of the options. One city may balk at that cost, but three large metropolitan areas 

certainly should be able to pool resources together and help develop something that will only help the entire region. It's time for things to be built 

with the future in mind, rather than building what is needed now (or 10 years prior). Other key metropolitan areas have had these types of systems 

in place for years. Why would we want to go build something that just brings us up to where the standards are (Brightline in S. Florida - connecting 

WPB, FLL, MIA for example) - instead of elevating ourselves and leveraging the opportunity to be ahead of other areas.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Please consider the I-85 route... it's faster, and takes the least amount of private land. Using the Crescent line at 5 hours defeats the purpose... 

people will just drive. The Greenfield line would be too intrusive to those with private property.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the I-85 route. It keeps development on that corridor and keeps existing and new infrastructure in one area instead of disturbing new 

areas and creating a bigger environmental impact on green fields.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the I-85 option is best Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I like the project but in my opinion it should go along the I85. That would have the least amount of impact on people and wildlife. It must connect 

the airports because the parking and commuting infrastructure is already in place.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the I-85 train route option because I feel it delivers a fair balance between speed and servicing the major metro areas. The nation is 

becoming more urbanized and focusing on speed and serving downtown metro areas will be key for our future. As a frequent business traveler I 

would use this line to quickly connect me to ATL or CLT airports, eliminating my need to take a senseless 25 min flight from GSP to ATL. Thank you.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

First of all a high speed rail from Atlanta via the Greenville area to Charlotte is an inevitable project. From living in other large cities where high 

speed rail was developed, ridership far exceeded projected expectations and I believe it would here as well. I think the I-85 corridor makes the 

most sense, stopping at the Greenville/Spartanburg airport en route to Charlotte. This allows for easier access since it right off I-85, vs going 

downtown. So yes, i am a strong supporter for this project.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a great project. Please build the I-85 route - don't force everyone in the Upstate SC to drive to the airport to access the train. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

The 85 corridor option, while the most upfront cost, would provide the most useful access in my opinion. If the 85 corridor is going to keep growing 

we desperately need a 21st century solution to public transit across these cities.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I am totally in favor of the three states continuing to work on high speed rail along the I-85 corridor between ATL and CLT. It makes very good sense 

for now and the future. I do question why we are not considering moving freight, as well as people. If we are going to undertake such a mammoth 

project, we must think of everything....you probably only get one shot at this! Removing shipping containers off of the interstate system between 

ATL and CLT would be a very effective improvement and probably offset enormous federal funds that would be spent in the future for widenings.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of the high speed rail in Gaston County Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support the high speed rail project, as rapid mass transit is essential to a healthy infrastructure for our country. I reviewed the proposals 

and am in favor of the I-85 route, as I think it makes the most sense for capacity and route.I would use the rail system if available, and it will be 

worth the investment.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Keep all rail lines flowing along the main expressways please. Do not hinder suburban or county areas. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I am a resident of Commerce, Georgia. I am an active member on its Downtown Development Authority. I support the corridor along I-85 through 

Commerce.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

As an active housing developer in the Southeast trying to meet the needs of our growing populations, I have been saying in our community 

(Greenville) for some time that we critically need high speed rail connecting Atlanta (Hartsfield) to Charlotte, and really on to Raleigh. I have been 

to China where these critical high speed rail lines are spurring development and ease of movement for its people. It is critical that the major 

stations in the major metropolitan areas are proximate to the urban cores that are walkable from all the urban infill residential development as well 

as hubs of public transportation in those communities. While the cost might exceed $15 billion to do this right, it is critical to be done right and it 

will pay off for these communities in spades, reduce highway congestion, and create economic stimulus in a way that will deliver for likely more 

than a decade.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I am so excited about this project! I lived in the Atlanta area from 1988 until May of this year. I think this project has been talked about for 30 years 

and is long overdue. Regarding the route, I think something that follows I-85 would be most convenient for passengers. Perhaps the stations could 

take the place of some of the rest stops along the way.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I am a property owner in Commerce GA. This area is renewing and growing. There has been a station in Commerce in years past. I believe a station 

would continue the economic growth in this area. I also believe the location of Commere offers many advantages.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a great idea.I believe the 85 corridor makes more sense. Thank You and keep up the good work Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Totally in favor of the I-85 corridor. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I really like the route that follows I-85. It is an established corridor, so the environmental impacts as well as site work costs should be less than the 

other routes. In addition, putting high speed rail along a heavily traveled corridor would help reinforce how valuable and preferable high speed rail 

would be. Imagine sitting in traffic in your car on the interstate as you watch the train zoom but, full of people that are reading, working, etc. 

Because they aren't driving or stuck in traffic.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of the proposed train route that will run along I-85. I think this option would provide a great alternative route for people like myself 

that travel a lot for work and would rather not drive.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

New tracks running beside I-85, would cost $13.3 billion to $15.4 billion. Trains would go 125 to 180 mph and take less than three hours to reach 

Atlanta. Though this is a costly alternative. It would best serve the future needs of the population. The other alternatives are just band-aids which 

won't have enough rider participation to support the expense.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/17/2019 Web 

Comment

I like the Interstate 85 Corridor Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
10/12/2019 Web 

Comment

As a former transportation planner at GPATS who still lives in the City of Greenville, I wholeheartedly support this project. I have strong leanings 

towards the 85 route since it would benefit the most riders and have the most sensible stops (in larger cities). This is something I’ve been interested 

in for a long time, even before my transportation planning days. I believe this would greatly benefit the southeast in so many ways including 

environmentally, economically, quality of life, etc. I think connecting to each of the three major airports (atl, gvl-spart, Clt) is the smartest strategy 

as well. Thanks for getting this kick-started!!!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

9/20/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe you should look at providing a high capacity transit alternative using a high speed automated transit network (ATN) that parallels and uses 

the I-85 corridor right of way where possible. And use feeder loops of ultralight ATN to connect at mobility hubs to high speed ATN.

The Project's Purpose and Need (which appears in Section 3 of the Executive Summary) identifies the "Purpose of the Project is to improve intercity passenger 

travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region's transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and reliability through high-speed 

passenger rail system". This is a proven, well-established technology. FRA and GDOT wish to avoid delay in implementing service in the corridor while new 

technology is developed, tested, and refined.

Written 

Comment

Despite the high cost with the I-85 option long term speaking or even shorter term, I think it will have the higher impact in a positive way. The fact 

that it cuts through the major cities, it will benefit the larger population and very likely to reduce traffic problem, as it gives incentive to people to 

take the train as man mode of transportation as they travel. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

Written 

Comment

The I-85 corridor is my preference. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

Written 

Comment

I-85 Alternative appears best suited to Greenville and Spartanburg needs while providing reasonably fast rail speed and maximum ridership. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
Written 

Comment

I-85 corridor seems the most viable for longterm success. The Southern Crescent layout is appealing for quick timeline to implement and capital cost 

and for environmental impact, but isn't projected to operate in the black. Thank you GDOT for leading the wya to better mass transit options in the 

southern US. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Either option 2 or 3. Just bring the railway system to Anderson. We need it and welcome it!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be 

provided on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

Let's go for the "I-85" or "Greenfield" Option. I love this idea Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be 

provided on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe this project if greenlit would be a great addition to the region. The Southeast, in general, is sorely lacking in infrastructure. Connecting 

these two major cities will likely have a positive economic impact on the region. As a young professional it will make the possibility of living/working 

in a larger city realistic. I personally favor the two faster options over Southern Crescent Corridor which is not much different from the Amtrak train I 

have used in the past in terms of speed-- at least, not to the degree that it would warrant such a project. So, in closing, I say I-85/Greenfield 

Cooridor or bust!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be 

provided on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I am excited about our area possibly getting a high speed train. For many years I have felt that this would be a great addition to the area, for 

business and pleasure travel. I feel that the I-85 or Greenfield Corridor would be excellent choices.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be 

provided on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

While I like the stops on the crescent route best, I think the fact that it would be the slowest, while also being the least profitable and 

environmentally friendly, means it should not be the selected option. I like the stops for I-85 better than Greenfield, so that would be my choice. 

However the large difference in initial cost would make me ok with Greenfield as the selection too.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be 

provided on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the corridor that includes a potential station in Commerce. My second choice is Athens, and the third is Gainesville. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I want this to happen and favor options 2 and 3 Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern 

Crescent because the corridor’s geometry limited maximum speeds, generating travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and 

attracting lower levels of ridership. FRA dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while the I-85 performed better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, the 

geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also 

expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South Carolina. Finally, the I-85 presents engineering challenges 

due to corridor constrains around Greenville, SC that would require the Project Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the 

Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I fully support a high speed rail between Atlanta and Charlotte. I think it would greatly benefit all regions that the rail passes through. I think the 

proposed I-85 rail or the Southern Crescent are great ideas.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern 

Crescent because the corridor’s geometry limited maximum speeds, generating travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and 

attracting lower levels of ridership. FRA dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while the I-85 performed better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, the 

geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also 

expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South Carolina. Finally, the I-85 presents engineering challenges 

due to corridor constrains around Greenville, SC that would require the Project Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the 

Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I am opposed to the Greenfield route. I believe the other routes would provide more benefit for more locations in Georgia. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

This Tier I EIS performed a desktop-level review of environmental impacts that would result from this Project and did not perform any fieldwork as part of this 

study. A future Tier 2 study will perform a detailed review, including performing fieldwork, to determine any environmental impacts that result from the 

Project. FRA and the Project Sponsor will work with stakeholders to develop appropriate mitigation strategies for any environmental impacts that result from 

the Project. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide the 

development of the study. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study. 
10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I recommend the I85/NS or CSX corridor routes. There will be more opportunity for stations in more populated areas. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I think both the Crescent or I-85 corridor would be great in either of their proposed alignments. However, I prefer the alignments that include a stop 

in Tucker, as it would make it extremely easy for me to get downtown for work and to NE Georgia/Charlotte for personal visits.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern 

Crescent because the corridor’s geometry limited maximum speeds, generating travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and 

attracting lower levels of ridership. FRA dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while the I-85 performed better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, the 

geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also 

expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South Carolina. Finally, the I-85 presents engineering challenges 

due to corridor constrains around Greenville, SC that would require the Project Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the 

Corridor Alterna^ve’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I would totally support a high-speed rail lying that has a stop I would totally support a high-speed rail line that has a stop in Spartanburg South 

Carolina. I lived in the Northeast corridor and used trains every single day to go to work and it was a wonderful bonus and a benefit. I would also 

support fact that being able to go to Atlanta and or Greenville and Charlotte for major cultural events and museums and shows. given the 

alternative of not having anyway to go to work high-speed rail could get me into the larger markets that supports graphic design. I am a graphic 

designer. I am interested in public transit. Please expand the system and make it a reality. Thank you!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern 

Crescent because the corridor’s geometry limited maximum speeds, generating travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and 

attracting lower levels of ridership. FRA dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while the I-85 performed better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, the 

geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also 

expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South Carolina. Finally, the I-85 presents engineering challenges 

due to corridor constrains around Greenville, SC that would require the Project Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the 

Corridor Alterna^ve’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Please do an affordable (as in cost to traveler) high speed rail system from Charlotte to Atlanta! I would be good with the Southern Crescent 

Corridor or the I-85. This is something that is long overdue and would decrease the amount of traffic (and accidents) on I-85 so much. Please do 

this!!!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern 

Crescent because the corridor’s geometry limited maximum speeds, generating travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and 

attracting lower levels of ridership. FRA dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while the I-85 performed better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, the 

geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also 

expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South Carolina. Finally, the I-85 presents engineering challenges 

due to corridor constrains around Greenville, SC that would require the Project Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the 

Corridor Alterna^ve’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

This project is an excellent idea! Would love to see it become a reality after all these years. This region of the United States is very poorly connected. 

The only way to travel around is by car. The Crescent and Interstate 85 routes are very compelling even if they may be more expensive than the 

Greenfield option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern 

Crescent because the corridor’s geometry limited maximum speeds, generating travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and 

attracting lower levels of ridership. FRA dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while the I-85 performed better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, the 

geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also 

expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South Carolina. Finally, the I-85 presents engineering challenges 

due to corridor constrains around Greenville, SC that would require the Project Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the 

Corridor Alterna^ve’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

There is no reason NOT to follow already available rail or highway right-of-ways, versus the environmental & economic impact to local residents. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern 

Crescent because the corridor’s geometry limited maximum speeds, generating travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and 

attracting lower levels of ridership. FRA dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while the I-85 performed better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, the 

geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also 

expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South Carolina. Finally, the I-85 presents engineering challenges 

due to corridor constrains around Greenville, SC that would require the Project Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the 

Corridor Alterna^ve’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

This high speed rail option is wonderful to hear about and I am very excited for it to move forward. In my opinion not build is not an option. Of the 3 

options I believe the I85 or Cressent option would be best from a personal use, but all 3 any significantly better than not build. I live half way 

between atlanta and Charlotte and drive to both often, taking a high speed train would be so much better, especially to get to both major airpirts.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern 

Crescent because the corridor’s geometry limited maximum speeds, generating travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and 

attracting lower levels of ridership. FRA dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while the I-85 performed better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, the 

geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also 

expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South Carolina. Finally, the I-85 presents engineering challenges 

due to corridor constrains around Greenville, SC that would require the Project Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the 

Corridor Alterna^ve’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

In favor of the I-85 or the Greenfield Corridor. Being able to get to and from Atlanta, Greenville and or Charlotte would be huge for us personally and 

business wise.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern 

Crescent because the corridor’s geometry limited maximum speeds, generating travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and 

attracting lower levels of ridership. FRA dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while the I-85 performed better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, the 

geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also 

expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South Carolina. Finally, the I-85 presents engineering challenges 

due to corridor constrains around Greenville, SC that would require the Project Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the 

Corridor Alterna^ve’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield option would have too much impact on private homeowners and potential detriment to the Enoree River. I strongly oppose that 

option. Would be better to follow 85 or existing railroad tracks

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development.

In this Tier I EIS, FRA and GDOT performed a desktop-level review of environmental impacts that would result from this Project and did not perform any 

fieldwork as part of this study. A future Tier II study will select an exact route within the Greenfield Corridor Alternative, and will perform a detailed review, 

including fieldwork, to determine any environmental impacts that result from the Project. FRA and the Project Sponsor will work with stakeholders to develop 

appropriate mitigation strategies for any environmental impacts that result from the Project. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout 

the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide the development of the study. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have 

not been identified for a Tier II study. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe it should come through Gastonia. It's the largest nearby city outside of Charlotte. It's on route (I-85) from Atlanta to Charlotte, and would 

provide a way to encourage easy transportation for work, college students, etc.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

As a resident of Tuxedo Park, I am in no way interested in having a railway running along along the Enoree River. This would essentially be in our 

backyard. I believe the better option would be to have it run parallel to interstate 85.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I am not in favor of the Greenfield option. I would rather see it parallel to I85 Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the EIS. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I vehemently reject the greenfield project. Too many impacts on greens spaces, rivers, animals. I would vote on the 85 project. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the EIS. 
10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I am thrilled at the prospect of this project. Hopefully, I will see it come to fruition in my lifetime. I wanted to weigh in on the validity of the 

proposed corridor alternatives and train technology. While I am very sensitive to the socio-economic impact that the Southern Crescent line could 

have on the small towns it would serve, I can't endorse that option. I, for one, would have no use for a 5 to 6-hour train ride to get me to Charlotte 

when I can make that drive in under four hours. Given the lack of interest and continued subsidization of the Amtrac service that currently already 

uses that line it seems to be a waste of money to further invest in that option. If the people are going to pay for the rail system, it needs to benefit 

as many people as possible. I would probably be happy with either of the other two options. However, given that the I85 corridor has a more 

positive impact on the socio-economic category and the least impact on Parklands and Wildlife Refuges and Cultural and Historic Resources, I would 

most likely endorse that option. After end to end travel time, which will, in turn, impact the diverted trips category, those three categories are my 

top three concerns. I also like the fact that that the I85 alternative shows potential stations in places closer to high-density living areas(i.e., 

Greenville and Spartanburg). It would be prudent to plan for the continued influx of people moving from outlying areas to the inner city. Stops 

providing easy access to the downtown areas of Greenville and Spartanburg would definitely be an asset. My initial thoughts on electric versus 

diesel technology would lead me to endorse the electric option. Common sense dictates that more people will use a faster option and electric 

appears to fit that bill. Additionally, from an environmental standpoint, I would think electric would be a better option. I would like to see additional 

detailed information regarding each option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the EIS. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I do not support the Southern Crescent. It is too slow. No stops are easy to access. No stops are ADA compliant so cost listed would probably double. 

There is no connection to public buses or sidewalks. I do not support Greenfield. It had zero benefits for SC. It negatively impacts rural 

communities and landowners. It does not create a SC regional system. It poses health and safety issues. I DO support I85 and feel running the 

train in the median or above it makes sense. No land would be needed except for stops, ATL-GSP-CLT are all off 85 It creates tri-state regional 

system and an Upstate SC transportation system needed for projected growth. It is the only one that helps SC and since most of it will be in SC it 

needs to help our state not hurt it. What is the cost to SC? Who from disability organizations are part of your committee? Wish it would be in 

place in my lifetime.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the EIS. 

Any newly built rail facilities will fully comply with ADA regulations. To date, a community adivisory committee has not been established for this Project. 

However, throughout the study process GDOT met with community groups and other stakeholders to present the Project and receive their feedback. In 

future Tier 2 studiees, the Project Sponsor will continue to keep the public and other stakeholdes informed of the study progress. Funding and a Project 

Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study. 

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Preferred Alternative is I-85, need to limit number of stops to major metro cities to allow for high-speed rail to actually be effective and reduce 

travel time. I see no reason for multiple stops in Atlanta or Charlotte, but needs to connect with already existing rail system in cities. I don't see a 

need to connect to the airports, if someone is flying, they will fly to Charlotte, Greenville, etc. I would use this as long as total travel time, including 

time for me to get to stations, is less than driving and there is access to other modes of transportation at hubs. Ticket price point for travel also 

needs to be competitive to air travel, as travel by rail right now via Amtrack is not competitive enough or quick enough to warrant use.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the EIS. 
11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

The route illustrated for the Southern Crescent seems the most appealing to me. It also appears that many of the estimates for this route are based 

on a 4+ hour travel time however, page 2-34 of the Alternatives Considered document show a possible travel time of approximately 2.5 hours (2 

hours, 34 minutes). If ridership and other estimates related to the Southern Crescent are based on the 4+ hour shared+dedicated track alternative, 

I'd like to see the estimates revised in light of the 2.5 hour SC shared track travel time estimate. In any case, I would prefer to see the Norfolk 

Southern Atlanta approach.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be 

provided on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. It appears that the comment misstates the description of the Southern Crescent Alternative. Its estimated trip time is 5 hours 34 minutes, not 2 hours 34 minutes.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Utilizing the current Crescent Line infrastructure seems to be the most cost efficient choice. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to give my opinion that Toccoa, GA is a perfect venue for high speed rail. The tracks are already in place. Visitors would visit the military 

museum, Ida Cox festival, and Toccoa Falls to bane a few sights.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Atlanta to Charlotte Old C resent line Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Please use existing lines to save time and money. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I love the proposed Crescent route as it would service the greatest amount of people in between Atlanta and Charlotte. I feel what would make that 

route the clear choice would be a stop at the Greenville-Spartanburg Airport, like the Greenfield route has. That way, you reach the greatest amount 

of people as well as the three airports along the route, opening up this entire corridor in a way that no other region in the Southeast has done. 

Best of luck, I hope this gets done!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

We want high speed rail through Toccoa, Ga. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Please utilize the Cresent rail Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I’m in favor of the train. Also I’m in favor of stops/stations in Tucker GA and Toccoa GA. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be 

provided on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Please use the existing tracks through Toccoa Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Needs to come thru Toccoa Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I favor the Crescent route (through Suwanee, Toccoa and Clemson.) Seems to me it would require the least amount of work to make an ATL to CLT 

high speed rail line possible.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Gdot utilize the existing infrastructure on the crescent line, the most cost efficient option Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like the GDOT to utilize the current infrastructure on the Crescent Line to accomplish the high speed rail. I believe that would be the best 

option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Please utilize the existing infrastructure, crescent line Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

I am commenting to suggest creating the rail corridor by utilizing the infrastructure currently in place provided by the Cresent Line. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

We want you to use the existing track that Amtrak uses coming through Toccoa GA. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Choose the Blue line! Most cost effective and better for the local economy!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Choose BLUE! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Choose the blue option! Using existing infrastructure! It’s the only option that makes sense. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Please choose the blue line. Using the existing infrastructure and most likely the most cost effective corridor. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Expressing support for high speed rail on Crescent line with a stop in Toccoa, GA Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I feel using the Crescent rail line for high speed rail between Atlanta and Charlotte would be the way to go Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

This is concerning the proposed extension of a high speed rail corridor that would extend from Atlanta to Charlotte, NC. And I ask the GDOT to 

utilize the existing infrastructure on the Crescent Line, the most cost efficient option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

Please use the crescent line Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

Please use existing Toccoa rail line Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

I am all for it going through Toccoa. Plus it is way more cost effective. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

We would like to see the high speed rail from Atlanta to Charlotte utilize the Crescent line and stop in Toccoa. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to suggest that the lowest cost route be used for the high speed train from Atlanta to Charlotte. d like Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to see the current rail through Toccoa utilized. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

The Railroad that could possibly run through Toccoa is a God sent. Toccoa is a place that is growing and changing. I believe that Toccoa will be a 

HUGE attraction and Asset to the GA economy in the near future, and a line like this one will benefit GA as a whole. More than the other proposed 

lines will.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

A route through Toccoa would make my travel needs extremely better for health care and recreation! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

Please use current Norfolk Southern route thru Toccoa as this seems to me to be the best and cheapest route. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

Please choose the route through TOCCOA! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to see the new train line utilize an already existing rail line through Toccoa that offers more stops and times for our community. We 

have limited public transportation and this could expand job opportunities for our community as well as decrease traffic on 365 and 85 to Atlanta or 

Greenville!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

Please use the existing railway in Toccoa, GA. We would welcome the added opportunities for commerce and visibility. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

It seems that using the existing track/tracks would make this a no-brainer. This would have to the cost immensely. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

We believe the train line through Toccoa & Gainesville would be beneficial to those who travel often to Hartsfield Jackson Airport from the NE 

Georgia area. It would certainly reduce the necessity of traveling through metro Atl to get to the airport and MARTA is not accessible from NE Ga.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Please utilize the existing infrastructure and use the crescent route for the proposed railway to Charlotte. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Use current line through Toccoa, Georgia Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Use the existing line Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Please consider using the rails that already exists for the new high speed train. We would Love to have them come through Toccoa. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Allowing the corridor to be placed into the heart of the small town of Toccoa would result in a positive impact on the economy by bringing more 

visitors and potential businesses. It would also bring about an easily affordable travel method to pass through toccoa into a bigger city. The town 

needs traffic and a stimulus to the economy and I think that this would bring both.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Recommend using the crescent line since it is existing and will save funds Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to express my desire to see a high speed rail system developed on the current Crescent infrastructure in place. Having traveled in other 

countries that utilize high speed railways, I am excited about the possibilities for Georgia.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Please use the most cost effective corridor using the current Crescent line. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Please use existing infrastructure on the Crescent Line which is the most cost effective option. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Using the existing infrastructure on the Crescent line makes the best sense environmentally and financially. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Please utilize the existing infrastructure on the Crescent line. It just makes sense and disrupts the fewest people and land. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I feel like the Toccoa Route would be a great option since it is the least expensive. Although the route is the longest time-wise, it is significantly 

cheaper and more resourceful to use already existing infrastructure.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Please utilize the existing infrastructure on the Crescent Line in Toccoa. Thank You. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the use of existing infrastructure along the crescent line as this is most economical option . Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

The Cresent Line would be the most cost effective solution. And it would already use the current infrastructure existing on the North-South line of 

Southern Railway. I'll be happy to attend one of your meetings if another is coming in the near future.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

GDOT I would like you to consider utilizing the existing infrastructure on the Crescent Line, the most cost-efficient option. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Would love to see this come through Toccoa. It would be the cheapest and most efficient plus this little towns needs some attention. It would be a 

perfect stop to explore a downtown area plus be close to so many outdoor hikes.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Support running the route via existing corridor on Amtrac rails through Toccoa. Saves money and will probably be used more. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

The idea of a new high speed train is exciting news. The best route would definitely be the proposed route through Toccoa, GA. According to news 

reports, it would be the most cost effective choice. Toccoa has a lovely downtown area with several restaurants and many shops which would cater 

to travelers Toccoa is full of history such as the stories of the Band of Brothers and Olympic Gold medalist Paul Anderson- a lovely museum is 

located steps away from the Amtrak station. Toccoa is a lovely representation of Southern charm which any traveler would enjoy experiencing.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Please use the existing infrastructure to bring the high speed rail through Toccoa. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to urge the state of Georgia and all other parties involved would they ask for a high-speed train through Toccoa Georgia to please use 

the existing line with Norfolk Southern I go another small communities sure could use a boost by doing this and it also would save the state millions 

of dollars doing so.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I’m very much in favor of the Corredor coming through Toccoa. It will save a lot of money by utilizing existing lines. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Go through Toccoa Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Respectfully request the route that stops in Toccoa for high speed rail. Makes the best use of existing track and is the most efficient route. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

Please utilize the existing infrastructure on the Crescent line. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

I feel the existing infrastructure (Crescent Line) should be used for the high speed rail line link between Atlanta and Charlotte. We live in a country 

that needs to get back to some economic basics. The citizens can't afford extravagant costs. To me it is a no brainer which route to choose: a $2 

billion, $8 billion or a $13 billion - $16 billion line. Let's use some common sense and build the $2 billion rapid rail line.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

Does not make sense to take private land when the RR could easily follow the current rail lines Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

I work for Currahee Military Museum in Toccoa. We are actually located in the same train depot that is currently used for Amtrak stops in Toccoa. 

Since our museum depends on tourism, we are always suggesting to our visitors and potential travelers to use Amtrak. Another option for faster 

travel with different hours would be a win win for tourist, vacationers and business travel from Toccoa and points north to Atlanta, especially the 

Atlanta and Charlotte airports.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I would prefer route one that goes through Clemson because it brings a lot of easy options for Clemson students and faculty members. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

It makes most sense to follow an existing rail line...most likely cheaper and could be completed faster. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

The world certainly does not need more rail grade crossings for the motoring public to disregard! So using the present Cresent line seems more 

practical and economical.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be 

provided on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

First I'd like to state my support for this project, I believe that this and many more high speed transit systems will make our country more globally 

competitive as well as create a more equitable society. I'd also like to state my support for the proposed Crescent route as I believe it would be an 

enormous economic asset to a region which has long needed additional industry. I intend to do everything I can to support the continued growth 

and acceptance of this project!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

The upstate route going through Greer on the Crescent line would be a boom to the already growing Greer inland port which has great economic 

impact on whole state also would be cheapest route to take.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Requesting DOT to use the existing infrastructure along the crescent line using Toccoa as a stop. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Would like for the highspeed rail Atlanta to Charlotte to come through Toccoa, GA, where we already have Amtrak. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Please use the existing infrastructure along the Crescent Line for the route to Charlotte. It will be cheaper and help the economies of the small 

towns along the route. It’s also more scenic.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I wish to express my opinion for routing of the rail line along the current infrastructure using the crescent rail line that is already in place, and to 

include a stop at the Toccoa Depot.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I prefer the Southern Crescent route with a stop in Toccoa. Thank you. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Whole I will fully support any of the three corridor options, it seems to me that the downtown Greenville stop would be best for most ridership. 

Ridership will grow as well as people realize they can live in Greenville and be in Atlanta or Charlotte for work in an hour or so. I would expect major 

population growth in our area for that reason alone.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be 

provided on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Northern route is very desirable and preferred. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

High speed rail is long overdue for the south. Of the corridor options outlined in the documentation, it is my opinion that the Southern Crescent is 

the best choice. Since high speed rail is controversial and has a reputation for being expensive while providing little benefit, it makes sense to go 

with the most economical option that will provide service to the largest number of people. The increased number of stops on this route as well as 

the lack of disruption to existing infrastructure makes it a solid choice for the South's first foray into this transportation technology.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I prefer either the Norfolk Southern Railroad route or the Interstate 85 route for the rail system. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern 

Crescent because the corridor’s geometry limited maximum speeds, generating travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and 

attracting lower levels of ridership. FRA dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while the I-85 performed better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, the 

geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also 

expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South Carolina. Finally, the I-85 presents engineering challenges 

due to corridor constrains around Greenville, SC that would require the Project Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the 

Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the EIS. 
10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

Current Crescent line. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I applaud your consideration of an alternate train for the CLT-ATL route and encourage you to pursue this. For years I road Amtrak from G'ville to 

Birmingham for business, rather than drive the distance and I avoided the horrible ATL traffic. I booked a rental car to pick me up in B'ham and 

made sale calls for a week. My business associates who had never used public transit in Europe, didn't understand my enjoyment of the no- stress 

travel arrangements. I vote to use the existing tracks for economic reasons, but urge a private/public co-op to upgrade them. Currently Amtrak 

trains are often delayed because of issues with commercial trains, which take precedence over Amtrak.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

Use crescent line which is already in use and savings can be used for upgrades or other projects. Track maintenance could be shared, improved and 

there is a upgrade being done on the rail station being done now. Most cost effective and seems a more direct route since this is to link major 

cities. Moved here (Toccoa) 4 years ago from Atlanta.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

As someone who moved just outside of Charlotte now, but frequently travels between the two cities and GSP, I think this is a great travel option! I 

do think any ability to utilize current infrastructure (even with some upgrades as needed) is a much more cost efficient option and much less 

environmental impact than others. This would also, I would think, lower the revenue to cost ratio in the immediate and longer term as it is sharing 

infrastructure with a track and other stakeholders. Having an option to connect to gsp for both Charlotte and Atlanta folks would also increase the 

number of individuals who purchase flights to and from GSP as tickets are typically cheaper there as I have found the last 8-9 years. The economic 

impact to all connected cities would also see an increase being easily accessible by high speed rail service for day trips. I do think consideration of 

cost to outfit emergency services within the operating region needs to be weighed heavily as additional fire fighting equipment from trucks to foam 

for fires, to emergency access does cost a significant amount. The risk of something happening requiring emergency services is increased as speed of 

the rail services increase and just the fact of people not always making smart choices or animals venturing into tracks or natural things such as down 

trees happening. All in all. I think this would be a great asset though

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be 

provided on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Since the proposed high-speed 

rail line would have no at-grade crossings, would be fenced, and would have adjacent trees removed, it would be extremeely safe, as high-speed rail lines 

have proven to be in other countries.
10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

Please consider the alternatives for the high-speed rail line to use the Norfolk Southern line or along the I 85 corridor passing through Gastonia, 

North Carolina. As the county seat, Gastonia would Support use of this rail line and has the infrastructure for parking to meet the needs of the line 

also. The population density would also help to support use of the line between Charlotte and Atlanta.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern 

Crescent because the corridor’s geometry limited maximum speeds, generating travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and 

attracting lower levels of ridership. FRA dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while the I-85 performed better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, the 

geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also 

expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South Carolina. Finally, the I-85 presents engineering challenges 

due to corridor constrains around Greenville, SC that would require the Project Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the 

Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the EIS. 

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I would prefer the first option with stops located in Greenville, Clemson, Greer, and Spartanburg. This would allow for further employment 

opportunities.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Huge supporter of the rail. I have family that lives in Atlanta and just myself settled down here in Greenville. I just purchased a property in Greer, SC 

and believe the rail would accommodate the growth of this area. Having an option of a ride share that saves time would encourage travel to the 

nearby cities. I, as well as my relatives, would be regular riders for sure.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to see the high speed rail option that travels through Gainesville, GA using the existing Silver Crescent Track. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

The use of the current infrastructure of the Cresent that comes through Toccoa, GA is recommended for the Atlanta to Charlotte railway. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

The option of using the existing Norfolk Southern line or a new line that follows I-85 are the best. The Greenfield option is not the best for Gastonia, 

as it will bypass our downtown.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern 

Crescent because the corridor’s geometry limited maximum speeds, generating travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and 

attracting lower levels of ridership. FRA dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while the I-85 performed better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, the 

geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also 

expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South Carolina. Finally, the I-85 presents engineering challenges 

due to corridor constrains around Greenville, SC that would require the Project Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the 

Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the EIS. 

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I would encourage the use of the existing rail corridor currently used by Amtrak and the Norfolk Southern Railway. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to let my voice be heard on the proposed plans for a high speed rail corridor that could come through Toccoa, using the Amtrak's 

Crescent Line. I am currently em[plowed by the Chamber of Commerce and work as the Welcome Center Manager. I see this opportunity as an 

asset for not only the new train, but also for our community. I have several people come through during the week asking about our train service. 

They are impressed by our facilities and that we have this in our city.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Please consider using the Crescent Line/Norfolk Southern/Amtrak line that is already available in Toccoa! Excellent facilities. Excellent location. We 

would travel this line regularly if it was made available.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Love this idea and love the route that has a proposed stop at Clemson. I would utilize this form of travel to go to Charlotte or Atlanta. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

In regard to the high speed rail, I ask that you please utilize the existing infrastructure on the Cresent line through Toccoa. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

In regard to the high speed rail, I would like to encourage use of the existing infrastructure on the Cresent line, through Toccoa. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Use the current Norfolk attack route Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Please give rights to have a high speed AmTrak to use the existing Norfolk Track through Toccoa Georgia. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to have the highspeed rail service that is proposed to run Atlanta to Charlotte come through, and stop, in Toccoa, Georgia. We currently 

have the rails coming through Toccoa.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the southern crescent option, as Greer is about to take off and having access to city centers is a much more car-free friendly option. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Please do the last option that goes through Gainesville. There are many many people who have to commute from the university to Atlanta and back 

again. Students, alumni, faculty, and for all those games.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

The crescent rail corridor would be a fantastic choice for the high speed rail. This alignment will be the cheapest saving billions of taxpayer dollars, 

and it likely will have the quickest build out. In addition, the crescent alignment will also provide a transportation alternative for the thousands of 

Clemson fans that travel to the town for football games. Go Tigers!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

highly support to connect and enhance transportation through upstate SC Clemson Oconee County Industry Power Plant ie Seneca has 

active rail line

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I support option 1. Crescent line Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Please build the Southeast Corridor!!!! The economic benefit would be enormous. The Southeast corridor would connect Clemson University to 

major cities and airports, and allow the talent and research to spread throughout the southeast. Also, this could help with the sprawl of Atlanta and 

Charlotte. More people could live farther out without having to drive.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I have family in Atlanta and Charlotte and I will still drive. I would lived in the Northeast and rarely took the high speed train from Boston to NYC. 

Go with the less expensive option, less disruptive to established communities Don’t think people in the South are as used to public transportation 

as up North

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

A route for the high speed train along the existing Crescent corridor would make the most sense. The population of potential Georgia stakeholders 

are greatest in the NE Atlanta suburbs. The project would need a substantial source of funding through fares, and both the density and affluence in 

these areas would best support such a model. Additionally, infrastructure improvements along the Crescent corridor close in to Atlanta and 

Charlotte could assist in lowering funding hurdles for improvements/extensions of state or local light rail options.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I prefer Suwanee thru Gainesville line. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the project to build a high speed rail connection between Atlanta and Charlotte. I suggest following the Crescent route. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly support the expansion of public transit in the southeast, and I believe that the proposed blue line from Atlanta to Charlotte running 

through Gainesville and Greenville would be the most impactful. If we here in the South are going to compete with the larger interconnected 

regions like the northeast in the coming years, especially in wooing large corporations as traffic worsens and we run out of roads here in Atlanta, 

then we must drastically overhaul our outlook towards public transit. The devil is in the details, and I hope that, when planning this type of project, 

there is no cronyism or foolish self-dealing, because, if done correctly, this type of project could pave the way for healthy economic growth in a 

multitude of industries in our great southern region.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I and numerous others, greatly prefer the new highspeed rail to use the I-985 and current Amtrack corridor. It not only passes through more cities to 

gain additional passengers with more possible destinations if needed in the future, but it would be less stress on the environment than through east 

GA and be away from the current traffic and construction issues on the I-85 corridor. With a current rail line already in this path, it should also have 

less construction costs.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

By all means, the Crescent route is the most direct and most efficient. Please choose this one!!! We need it :) Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I really liked the Cresent Route. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

The cresent corridor is the best option Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Great idea!! Hope they build it. Too bad it is just to Charlotte because I drive to Burlington, NC a lot. It will help with traffic!!! I like the blue and red 

line better more the blue one because it goes through more GA cities. The red I feel will cause issues on I-85 when being built. The green passes 

few big towns after metro Atlanta. It is nice it goes to Athens but then it goes to Anderson and not another city again til Greenville. The other two 

reach more cities.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern 

Crescent because the corridor’s geometry limited maximum speeds, generating travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and 

attracting lower levels of ridership. FRA dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while the I-85 performed better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, the 

geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also 

expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South Carolina. Finally, the I-85 presents engineering challenges 

due to corridor constrains around Greenville, SC that would require the Project Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the 

Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the EIS. 

Atlanta - Charlotte is part of the larger Southeast Rail Corridor that covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond 

and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast Corridor. Other long-term visions are under consideration for the development of rail in the 

Southeast. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional 

rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-network-development/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast 

Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copyof-commission-reports-1.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

We need this. Please consider the route that comes closest to Hall and Forsythe counties. This has been the fastest-growing area in Georgia for 

some time.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I would be in favor for avtesin route. ( for my location preferably the blue route only because getting to Gainesville has become a nightmare) 

however I do think doing something to improve safety and traffic between Clarkesville and Cleveland and improving safety on 365 should be a 

higher priority.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Build additional tracks along the Norfolk Southern corridor at 110-125 mph speeds. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the Crescent route due to its using an existing rail ROW thus reducing environmental impact and lessening the cost for infrastructure. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

The proposed high speed train connecting Atlanta and Charlotte is a wonderful plan! My husband and I are frequent travelers and would LOVE to be 

able to take a train from Toccoa to various airports. Please approve this plan.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Because of Gwinnett County's resistance to extending MARTA, the hope for Hall County/Gainesville having any rail connection to Atlanta is far, far 

away. And it would be a plus to take high speed rail into Charlotte.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Residents of Gainesville, GA, would love to be able to ride a train to the Atlanta airport, to cultural events in Atlanta and Charlotte, to visit relatives, 

and would find MANY other reasons to ride instead of drive that long distance!!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe the best high-speed rail option is the 268 mile Norfolk Southern route. It would go through the heart of Hall County with a major 

population. There is no other public transportation in this area to speak of and is desperately needed for commuting into the city of Atlanta 

including the airport. The nearest Marta station is in Doraville which is over 31 miles away.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

My preference is #1: using the Southern Crescent ROW, as I understand the materials. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I would prefer the existing Crescent line and Norfolk Southern approach into Atlanta. Please add me to the project mailing list. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I think that high-speed rail service is a great idea for the Gainesville economy as well as convenience for travel. I have traveled to Boca Raton and 

their service (Brightline) is an excellent option for travel to reduce emissions of vehicles traveling on the roads.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Please bring high speed rail along the Amtrak line to include Toccoa to the airport! It takes 2.5-3hrs to get there from here by car. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Please utilize the existing Cresent line for the expansion/upgrade of the Atlanta to Charlotte route. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Favor using the Crescent line for high speed rail. Highly support addition of this type of transport, wld be very beneficial. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Strongly support this high speed rail alternative. The route that includes Gainesville Ga would be well supported ,especially by several large 55+ 

communities that are interested in using alternative transportation.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

Glad to see state of GA embrace more rail to move people regionally. We need it so bad in the Southeast US. Prefer the plan that includes Suwanee. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love to see the corridor chosen through Hall County (Norfolk Southern Line). Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

The blue line please. A train stop in Gainesville Ga. would be nice so would a stop in Gafney Sc. 85 corridor is so busy and a train option would do 

well.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I do not think this should go through Anderson, SC or Athens, GA. Athens is already a high population area due to the university and adding this will 

only make it more congested. Anderson is also getting to be a high congested area. I feel as if other options are a better idea to prevent these cities 

from getting more congested and causing more pollution.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I just wanted to state that I think the Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor (Crescent route) is an AWESOME idea and would be extremely 

beneficial for another mode of transportation, hopefully lessening some of the traffic on the highways and interstates along this corridor.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Offering this alternative means of travel will open the door to increase trade and help grow business and commerce in NE Georgia. We already have 

consistent, every day traffic on and off the Crescent Line in Toccoa, I am requesting GDOT use the existing infrastructure along the Crescent line, 

keeping Toccoa as a stop. Doing so will attract even more commuters and help grow NE Georgia. Our community has recently built a beautiful 

RailwayViewing Station and Amtrak is currently renovating the Toccoa Station...ready for the new commuter train addition to the existing Crescent 

Line. In fact, they may be updating our rail platform specifically for this rail corridor

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the route through gainesville is the best route, we already have the rails and a depot,Gainesville is a fast growing area and we need more 

transit options

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I respectfully ask you to go with the route that goes through Toccoa. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

The current railroad tracks from Atlanta GA to Gainesville, GA. toToccoa GA, to Clemson SC and to Greenville, S.C. and on to Charlotte NC should be 

the best route. Also for the proposed line to cross Lake Hartwell the span for the Northern route would be much much less than the other routes.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

The current railroad tracks from Atlanta GA to Gainesville, GA. toToccoa GA, to Clemson SC and to Greenville, S.C. and on to Charlotte NC should be 

the best route. Also for the proposed line to cross Lake Hartwell the span for the Northern route would be much much less than the other routes.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Please utilize the existing rail line infrastructure along the Crescent line. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe it would make sense to use the existing infrastructure on the Crescent line. It would also bring tourists through a beautiful and scenic area 

of Northeast Georgia.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this is a great idea and would love any of the corridor options.My rankings of the options, through Gainesville makes the most sense, 

followed by the Athens option and then the third option.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

Written 

Comment

Southern Crescent corridor to Greenville & Charlotte is my vote. Please continue to hold open houses for other corridors. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
Written 

Comment

I wish to comment on the proposed rapid rail line from Atlanta to Charlotte.. The rail line already exists and is barely used for people.. It is a disgrace 

that the only Amtrak stations in use in Georgia are Atlanta, Savannah and Toccoa.. If you wish to go from Atlanta to Savannah on rail you have to go 

to Charlotte or Washington and transfer.. The only passenger trains through Atlanta are a northbound at night and a south bound early in the 

morning. South bound after Atlanta the next stop is Anniston, Alabama.. North bound the next stop is Toccoa at 10pm and then on north.. Atlanta is 

the hub of air transportation in the southeast but barely exists for rail service.. The service to Toccoa and beyond aready has the tracks in place.. It 

would be a simple thing for Congress/ ICC to change the schedules for freight traffic to allow passenger use for rush hours and the evening... The 

rails and stations are already there.. Just purchase passenger cars and engines and it is ready to go.. We are talking about instituting service in a 

matter of months instead of decades.. Also we are speaking of doing it for millions instead of billions.. This would be an immediate stop gap measure 

to relieve traffic on I-85 and Buford Highway.. 

If public hearings are held on this I would like to be notified.. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

Written 

Comment

I think the Southern Crescent would meet my needs the most a long with the City of Greer. It would be nice to have stops in Greenville, Greer, and 

Spartanburg. Also, Anderson. I would ride out to both Atlanta and Charlotte for pleasure. I would prefer train over automobiles. #2 choice would be 

Greenfield Corrirdor with electric. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

Written 

Comment

The Southern Crescent corridor sounds very appealing with multiple stops, especially in Greer. I also like the Greenfield Corridor because of the 

nearby acccess at GSP. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
Court Reporter

I am proposing that the DOT do this project on an existing rail route on the Norfolk Southern Railroad, starting with commuter rail. Start in Hall 

County with several stops including Buford, Dacula, Duluth, Norcross and others; then from Norcross run an express train no stops straight to the 

Buckhead train station. This could be done in 60 days if they would hurry. Certainly it shouldn't take over a year to do. There is existing rail because 

Amtrak runs this route every day.· So I know it can be done. They have the cars and locomotives. All that equipment can be acquired for this. The rail 

stops would be nothing but a concrete pad with a shed roof, just like they use in Europe. In Norcross, the parking places are right down through the 

middle of town. The city has the railroad. In Duluth, public property is on both sides of where this proposed station would be. The City owns the 

property on one side, the school board owns the property on the other side. There could be a big rail station there. There are other stops further up 

the line, and when you get passed Sugarloaf Parkway, there is a lot of vacant land up there for proposed rail. That would be true all the way to Hall 

County. This will take an enormous amount of traffic off 985 and 85. Right of way for the rail stops shouldn't cost over a million dollars. Operational 

costs would be minimal compared to operating MARTA rail. It is the most practical answer to rapid transit in Hall County down to Atlanta. It is the 

cheapest, can be built the fastest, and will transport the most people. I know it can be done because the state has already signed a contract with 

CSX for operation doing rail from Hall County to Cherokee County and various stops. That property would require rebuilding the Howell Interlock 

where CSX and Norfolk Southern cross. This doesn't require rebuilding anything.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Commuter rail service is outside of the Purpose and Need of this study, however both of the Altanta and Charlotte metro areas 

have considered commuter rail services through other studies. 

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I support building a high-speed rail system between Atlanta and Charlotte. I prefer the Southern Crescent alternative (for its linkage to key university 

and tech-centered cities) and the Greenfield alternative (for its linkage to Athens and the higher speed/lower trip time that the alternative would 

provide). I agree that it is important to look at the ability for an alternative to replace single-user vehicles and air travel between Atlanta and 

Charlotte in order to determine its effectiveness. High-speed passenger rail is very much needed within the nation. The SEHSR Corridor would go a 

long way to provide more efficient and environmentally-friendly travel between Washington DC and Atlanta. I believe that building this system 

would be a good use of tax-payer money.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Student living on campus at UNC Charlotte. It may be worth looking at where the majority of the slowdown on the Southern Crescent corridor 

occurs. The population centers at Greenville and possibly Spartanburg do look like they need reliable and direct service not provided by the 

Greenfield route, and the I-85 corridor seems to have a high enough cost to not be feasible. If tehre was some way to find an alternative with limited 

Greenfield serving Athens and perhaps Anderson and then connec to existing NS tracks along the Southern Crescent through Greenville and 

Spartanburg and maybe Gastonia and may reduce cost and have only a limited time cost. I know a fair amoun of Greenville-Spartanburg 

International Airport flights are connections to Charlotte-Douglas (though I am unsure of how much of overall travel that includes). There may be a 

lot of potential to compete with those short connections if a connection at Greenville-Spartanburg is direct enough to Charlotte-Douglas to be 

completitive considering time cost of secuirty at airports. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Prefer Southern Crescent connecting through downtown Greenville, however, +4 hours ride time is too long to serve majority of reasons I would 

ride. I-85 route would be next choice if it connected/had stop at or close to GSP. All 3 airports along route would be ideal. Priorities: ride time, 

connect through downtown Greenville, connect through GSP. Willing to pay extra taxes for something that is actually beneficial. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern 

Crescent because the corridor’s geometry limited maximum speeds, generating travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and 

attracting lower levels of ridership. FRA dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while the I-85 performed better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, the 

geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also 

expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South Carolina. Finally, the I-85 presents engineering challenges 

due to corridor constrains around Greenville, SC that would require the Project Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the 

Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Do not want the rail system to take my neighborhood. It needs to follow EXISTING railway in place!!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

As someone that would possibly by effected by the Greenfield Option, I support the other possible routes except Greenfield. It appears that it only 

exists for an Athens stop, which seems a little ridiculous. The Crescent option seems to be the best choice especially since it goes through Clemson.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development.

This Tier I EIS performed a desktop-level review of environmental impacts that would result from this Project and did not perform any fieldwork as part of this 

study. A future Tier 2 study will perform a detailed review, including performing fieldwork, to determine any environmental impacts that result from the 

Project. FRA and the Project Sponsor will work with stakeholders to develop appropriate mitigation strategies for any environmental impacts that result from 

the Project. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide the 

development of the study. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study. 

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Short of some Mickey-Mouse monorail, the fact that there isn't a single Mag-lev/High speed type train system, functioning anywhere in the land of 

my birth, from sea to shining sea; should be taken as, a point of national, not just regional disgrace. I'm all for the project! The Crescent line seems 

to make the most sense. My last commute, was 22 miles from Cartersvile to the PnR in Acworth, Express bus to Art Cntr Station, free shuttle to 

Atlantic Station, and the opposite, in the eve. 100 mile commute. I'd be impressed, if in 2019, you could actually catch a rail anywhere in Marietta, 

let alone Kennesaw College, or Cartersville, to the busiest airport on the planet, in our own backyard. Just another complete failure, by successive 

waves of no local vision or leadership. So I'm all for making Atlanta work by rail first! As one example, Marta needs to tunnel up to Kennesaw 

College, minimum! 20 years ago, they built a 30ft diameter, 2-300ft underground, Poop-pipe from Sope Creek to Chattahoochee at Moores Mill. 

Why does noone mention tunneling? Are we not allowed to have tunnels in the South? Ridiculous! How many miles of tunnels were constructed 

many decades ago in NY, and other cities? The European Chunnel is DECADES old! Use whatever works...a mix of above ground prefab stilts, 

traditional ground level and miles of tunnels where you need it. No above ground impediments, go in a straight line...pick a few choice locales to 

reemerge at a station, ....not necessarily rocket science. The tubes could possibly be later retrofit for pneumatic, autonomous, or other high-speed 

tech as they become increasingly feasible, over time. But the path would be there. Thanks for listening!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Tier 1 EIS did not consider or evaluate an underground option for any of the Corridor Alternatives or sections of a Corridor Alternative. Tunneling costs are 

typically much higher than at-grade construction and, in some instances, alignments that are elevated on structure. Tunneling of sections of the corridor may 

be considered in Tier 2 environmental reviews if feasible, cost effective, or required to avoid existing obstacles. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I have read the details on the High Speed Rail from Atlanta to Charlotte and I believe the best option is the Southern Crescent line. With Gwinnett 

county expected to be the largest county in the next 20-30 years, it makes sense for this line to take this route and cater to the heavy population. 

The I-85 route would be the next best option, but the potential for additional traffic on an already heavy travelled freeway, would be unbearable 

while construction would go on the median. High speed rail is desperately needed. On an east/west route since MARTA ends in Chamblee.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 
10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

After looking at the 3 route alternatives for the new rail project, I feel strongly that the Crescent route makes the most sense overall. It follows 

along closely to an existing rail line and be less intrusive to the existing communities and businesses along I-85 interstate. Yes, its not as fast, but the 

cost is considerably lower and much less intrusive. On a personal note, I travel to Atlanta regularly. I don't think I would use the rail as by the time I 

drive to the train depot (where ever that may be), park, have to arrive early most likely and then when I get to Atlanta, someone would have to pick 

me up and deal with traffic in that location. So, for me, it would be a lot easier to get in my car and drive and that way I would not have to 

inconvenience anyone. Also, the times the train would actually run through my town may not work with my schedule to travel. I don't think its 

worth the money. Widen 1-85 from Atlanta to Anderson to 3 lanes. That would help ALOT.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology.North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study. 

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of the crescent line. It could potentially provide safer alternatives to travel with convenient stops. I feel it could change how my family 

travels. Also, what is considered "high speed" and will it he affordable? I have looked at traveling via the station in Toccoa or Gainesville, but the 

price and amount of hours required to travel were at no advantage to driving or flying.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

I have been reviewing this project for a while-essentially since it was first announced several years ago. While I find myself largely agreeing with the Greenfield route, I strongly 

suggest that the respective DOTs reconsider some parts of the route. As is, I believe the Greenfield route is fatally flawed in two areas, specifically the approaches to the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area, and the "South Gastonia" approach. With respect to the approaches to Greenville/Spartanburg, the Greenfield routing, having a station only in the 

area of GSP airport fundamentally undermines the downtown-to-downtown concept of rail transit that is so attractive to potential consumers of such transit. Indeed, rail transit is 

most attractive when it can offer door-to-door service between major business destinations, and bypassing the cities of Greenville and Spartanburg does not accomplish this 

objective. In fact, I would submit that skipping Greenville and Spartanburg will largely eliminate the ridership that could otherwise be generated in the space between Atlanta and 

Charlotte (i.e. those whose trips are not originating in Atlanta and terminating in Charlotte or vice versa). Doing so necessarily reduces the benefits that can be garnered by directly 

serving the two primary cities of the Upstate region in terms of revenue and economic development potential as well. When presenting the aforementioned concerns to the 

officials attending the Charlotte meeting, a common refrain by several of the officials was to describe a hypothetical scenario in which the GSP stop on the Greenfield route could 

become a regional transit hub, and the cities of Greenville and Spartanburg could voluntarily choose to buildout a regional rapid transit system connecting to that hub. I reminded 

the officials with whom I spoke that the hypothetical outlined above was a scenario that while possible, may not necessarily happen, and was therefore by implication, a poor 

justification for bypassing Greenville and Spartanburg. I also reminded the officials if someone had to make a business trip from say Spartanburg to Charlotte, he/she would likely 

not be inclined to travel 15-20 minutes from Spartanburg to the GSP station (even with convenient rapid transit), wait 30-60 minutes on a train, and then ride for 45-60 minutes on 

the train when they could accomplish the Spartanburg-Charlotte trip in their own personal car in just over an hour. The second fatal flaw is the approach into west Charlotte. 

Indeed, the South Gastonia station not only bypasses the center of Gastonia, it also looks as if it cuts through a large number of single-family residential neighborhoods. The 

individuals in these neighborhoods would likely strongly oppose such an alignment. Furthermore, the possibility of damage to environmentally sensitive areas including probable 

adverse impacts to wetlands around the Catawba River and South Fork Catawba River create the distinct possibility that the project could face long and costly legal battles. One need 

look no further than the defunct Garden Parkway project (a project which was to traverse the area south of Gastonia) to see just how a powerful coalition of environmental activists 

and NIMBYs can derail a large scale infrastructure project. Given the aforementioned concerns, I strongly suggest that GDOT, NCDOT, and SCDOT consider changing the Greenfield 

route to a hybrid route in which segments of the Southern Crescent route are utilized in order to gain access to the areas in/near downtown Greenville, Downtown Spartanburg, and 

Downtown Gastonia. Such a route, roughly described, would follow the Greenfield alignment between Atlanta and Anderson, then turn northward, intercepting the Southern 

Crescent route West of Greenville and utilizing that route through Greenville, Greer, and Spartanburg. Once past Spartanburg, the hybrid alignment would continue East, 

intercepting the Greenfield route again and utilizing that route until reaching the area south of Kings Mountain where it would need to be turned northward and again merged with 

the Crescent route for the approach to Charlotte. I believe this route to be far superior to the Greenfield route as proposed because it would provide direct access to the 

employment and population centers of Greenville, Spartanburg, and Gastonia rather than the indirect access that the Greenfield alignment provides to those cities as it is currently 

proposed to do. Considering that employment and population density are [ostensibly] highly correlated to ridership, I believe the hybrid route would produce greater ridership and 

greater revenue, albeit with a minor tradeoff for average train speed. As a secondary benefit, such a route could provide the basis for regional commuter rail lines between Athens 

and Atlanta, Greenville and Spartanburg, and Gastonia and Charlotte which could potentially share ROW or perhaps even tracks. As such, it could open the possibility of potential 

alternate funding streams for the proposed high speed rail line. The Atlanta to Charlotte high speed rail corridor is a project that represents a generational opportunity. Getting it 

right is absolutely imperative, and bypassing major cities along the corridor is not a recipe for getting it right.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. The approach into Charlotte will be 

validated in the Tier 2 study, with additional analysis if necessary.

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

Follow the interstate, but split at Commerce to catch Athens/Lawrenceville/Tucker. There were 15 comments, or 0.006% of total comments, that referenced support for alternatives not considered in the Draft EIS. The Purpose of the Project is 

to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region’s transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and 

reliability through high-speed passenger rail services. The Project will provide transportation system capacity necessary to accommodate current and 

projected population and economic growth occurring along the Southeast High-Speed Rail (SEHSR) Corridor network including the following metropolitan 

areas in the Piedmont Atlantic Megaregion: Atlanta, Charlotte, Greenville, and Spartanburg. GDOT has identified eight transportation system needs relevant 

to the Study Area, each corresponding to the anticipated population and employment growth with increasing travel demand. The Project will satisfy the 

following needs: population and employment growth; improve regional transportation system connectivity; increase transportation system capacity; improve 

travel times and reliability; provide an alternative travel mode; traveler safety; improve energy efficiency and air quality; and maintain and enhance economic 

growth and vitality. The Project Need and Purpose can be referenced in Section 1.4 of the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. 

During this Tier 1 EIS, each of the Corridor Alternatives was analyzed (e.g. environmental, ridership modeling, etc.) independently and for the entire proposed 

route versus on a segment level. Therefore, the observed/calculated potential benefits and/or impacts for each of the Corridor Alternatives are not 

transferrable or interchangeable to any of the other corridor alternatives. A future Tier 2 environmental review may evaluate variations or corridor hybrids 

that will require further evaluation of impacts related to environmental, ridership, stations, service operating characteristics and other potential benefits. 
10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

You should modify the Greenfield route to go through both downtown greenville and GSP airport. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

We would request that an alternate option to the greenfield option be selected for a high speed rail through south carolina. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Please pursue a true high speed rail route that prioritizes passenger travel over a shared corridor with freight. Atlanta and Charlotte (in addition to 

Nashville) are the foundation of the southeast's growing economy in the United States. Linking these economic powerhouses that punch above their 

belt considering existing density will be a boon to economic activity, infill development in-town, and provide true alternatives to single occupant 

vehicle travel and carbon emission heavy air travel. As Atlanta and Charlotte continue to grow in prosperity, connecting the cities with high speed 

rail will allow their economies to accelerate through healthy trade and easier access between one another. The corridor will draw in even more 

talent as it becomes easier to navigate between the two destinations. The slower approach will not make a significant impact on existing traffic or 

economy. In reality, the slowest approach will only hinder our economies moving forward as we would be decades behind the infrastructure 

capabilities and economic demands, warranting the modern technology. Meanwhile the fastest approaches, so long as they include train stations 

at economic hubs and walkable city centers, not just airports where you'd have to park and ride or rent another car. This is why I do not suggest one 

alternative over the other except for to not pursue the slowest Southern Crescent or diesel track alternatives. Rather, I recommend a blend of the 

electric dedicated tracks for the Greenfield Corridor alternative to include Athens, GA, but also a portion of the I-85 Corridor to include Greenville, 

SC. Greenville is a growing economic destination as a city for people who want to trade and live. Bypassing Greenville's urban center takes away 

from the economic potential of a major opportunity for South Carolina and the southeast. It is absolutely critical we invest the financial capital to 

receive the economic return on investment, even if it were to exceed the $6-8 billion estimates for the Greenfield Corridor dedicated electric tracks. 

Finally, ensure the origin and destinations of the high speed rail lines begin and end in walkable, pedestrian friendly destinations in both Charlotte 

and Atlanta. The goal is to get people between cities without a car. Do not place the stations in locations where riders would have to switch major 

modes of transportation other than existing public transit or be able to walk or bike to their destinations. Atlanta to Charlotte high speed rail is a 

major economic opportunity for the southeastern United States in a location that will have limited impact of forthcoming climate change. Now is 

the time to invest in economic powerhouses Atlanta and Charlotte, which are located in geographically sensible locations and whose demographic 

and economic trends continue to show bustling residential and employment growth. We are the future.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to see a combination of the I-85 and Greenfield options. The Greenfield route seems to bypass a lot of population centers in South 

Carolina and seems to exist mainly to link Atlanta and Charlotte without serving South Carolina as well as the other options. The Anderson station is 

far from anything, and Greenville and Spartanburg would have to both have some kind of transit link from the city to the GSP airport station. It 

would be good to explore a route that starts with the Greenfield option from Atlanta to Athens, then north of Anderson SC to serve a 

Clemson/Anderson station, along I-85 to Greenville and Spartanburg, and then back to the Greenfield route through South Gastoinia.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I would STRONGLY encourage planners to consider COMBINING routes. I am generally in favor of the "Greenfield" option, but its most significant 

drawback is its distance (i.e. station distances) from the central areas of Greenville and Spartanburg. If it's a viable option to route the line 

completely along I-85, then why can it not be routed along 85 for a portion of the route, namely through GSP? The Greenfield route is already 

veering sharply west and east to make a connection at the GSP Airport, so just do so separately, on the north side of Spartanburg and south side of 

Greenville, respectively. The old 85 (i.e. 585) in Spartanburg needs an overhaul anyway--and the new 85 is never much more than a mile away at 

any point--so reconstructing the highway there with rail wouldn't be too disruptive, and having a station so close to the center of town (and by USC 

Upstate), would be well worth the trouble. I realize Greenville is more difficult, but it's even more important--since Greenville is the population 

center of the Upstate--to have a station in Greenville actually easily accessible to a majority of the city's population. The same rationale for 

relocating the train station in Charlotte--to the Gateway District--should be applied for getting train service as close to the center cities of Greenville 

and Spartanbug. But if routing the corridor through the countryside is cheaper, easier, and will provide faster service, then by all means do that, but 

just outside GSP. COMBINE ROUTES!!!!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I am in favor of developing a rail line with stops in Atlanta, Greenville-Spartanburg, and Charlotte. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Please add a stop in Greenville, SC. This would make it so much easier to reach Atlanta. This should connect the airports as well. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

9/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Has any consideration been given to modifying the Greenfield routing to more directly serve both Greenville's & Spartanburg's core areas? The 

routing already makes a significant diversion north to access the airport, so how much additional cost would be added if that diversion was 

stretched to the east & west, so that the route passes through (or much nearer) to the downtowns?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

A hybrid of the routes should be considered, specifically the Greenfield route from Charlotte to GSP and then pick up either the I-85 or Southern 

Crescent route to Atlanta. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

I support a hybrid route that includes downtown centers instead of airports (esp. Greenville). Such a route better connect other forms of 

transportation. If a hybrid is not viable, I encourage the southern crescent route for the reasons above. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

I would strongly encourage the alignment to NOT share usage with freight (i.e. Crescent). While I like this alignment in where it serves, sharing with 

freight always makes passenger service slow and unattractive. We need a reliable high speed rail service that's offered during normal passenger 

travel times. For example current rail service between Atlanta and Birmingham has awful time options for taking the service, and is not convenient. 

As far as alignment, I prefer that the HSR service making a connection to Athens, but would suggest that when heading east that the high speed rail 

line after Athens reconnect to the I-85 alignment so that it gets closer to Clemson than the greenfield option would. Connecting Atlanta and Athens 

to the heart of Greenville and Spartanburg is important, as all these cities are big draws for local travel and connecting college towns offers a 

generous pool of potential riders.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/17/2019 Web 

Comment

Given the complexity of this project, I suggest splitting the Greenfield alternative into several phased pieces. The proposed Greenville Spartanburg 

station at GSP airport is very close to the existing Crescent route. A short piece of track could allow for a combination of Greenfield from Atlanta to 

GSP and existing track from GSP t Charlotte. This adds complexity to alternatives analysis but could also reduce cost or allow for phased 

construction.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Is there any way to combine the 1-85 and Greenfield options to connect with Athens but also have another option in Greenville besides only the 

airport (based off the Greenfield option)? As Greenville grows, having a stop that is closer to the city (like the Southern Cresent option) will likely 

help divert more car trips in terms of convenience. Also, I like how the environmental comparison chart considers environmental justice. Does the 

environmental analysis look at the entire life cycle of the construction process (i.e. building materials, etc.)?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Court Reporter

Essentially, I am interested in seeing a hybrid between some of the corridors. I like the Green ine that goes to Athens in Georgia, but in South 

Carolina. I like the alignment that follows the existing railroad tracks through the various towns and cities. I like the connections to like Gaffney and 

Spartanburg, Greenville and Clemson. I think that is a very valuable connection because those are historic communities that need development. I 

have noticed that some of the criteria about where to encourage development -- I am wondering if they considered where development is needed. 

Atlanta and Charlotte are growing very fast. Rural parts of Georgia and South Carolina don't need new development, they need development in the 

communities that exist. So that's why I would like to see a hybrid alignment that goes through Athens, Georgia and follows the railroad track in 

South Carolina. That's it.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I strongly oppose a mass transit being built through my county/ city. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Not important when you can’t fix the bad road in Atlanta first. Waste of money when a ride to Charlotte only 3 1/2 ride what’s the rush besides a 

plane. Taking advantage of construction up 85 not going to be the same after it take 25 year to build this high speed rail .

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.
11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Train to Charlotte is a huge waste of resources. Flights are cheap and effective. This is completely unnecessary. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I do not want a fast track railroad this close to my house! Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Do not want it in Madison County Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

I do not want the high speed rail. It will be overpriced, take up land, and run behind schedule just like California. There are alternate transportation 

routes available that people can use. People should not lose their land for this boondoggle

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Please do not bring high speed rail through Madison county Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Not here please. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

No. We do not want a high speed rail line through our community. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.
11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Please don't do this! Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

No thanks. We live in farm country because we don’t want the pollution, visual and environmental, or the increased people. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

We are apposed to bringing this rapid rail line through our county, Madison county.This area is one of the truly rural and farmland areas in this part 

of the state,and we don't need our farms and timberlands split in in half just to benefit our neighboring counties to our south.We love our rural 

setting which has already been compromised with this multimillion waste of taxpayers money on this new bypass road that you recently bulldozed 

through our countryside. Thanks for your consideration.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

Do not put the rail system through Madison county!! Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

We have HUGE needs to replace 50 plus year old bridges and drainage systems. Without showing how our taxes will cover the long term financial 

requirements to maintain these facilities, i cannot support a project of this magnitude.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study. The 

analysis shows that operation of this high speed rail service would be profitable, as is typical of high speed rail lines in heavily-populated corridors such as this.

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

We have HUGE needs to replace 50 plus year old bridges and drainage systems. Without showing how our taxes will cover the long term financial 

requirements to maintain these facilities, i cannot support a project of this magnitude.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study. The 

analysis shows that operation of this high speed rail service would be profitable, as is typical of high speed rail lines in heavily-populated corridors such as this.

11/2/2019 Web 

Comment

Please no rail going through! Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.
11/1/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield high speed train option is NOT OK. I am against putting these tracks on private property. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

Clemson is already too congested and to far from 85 for major community access without imposing on local traffic. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

A truly dumb idea that is way to costly. Another high speed rail boondoggle like the one in California. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

Unhappy with these routes being planned through Cherokee county without any access being given for our residents. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

We do not need the high speed rail from Charlotte to Atlanta. We have the interstate system (that we already have to pay for) and planes. We also 

do not need the high crime that comes along with your rail proposal. We pay enough taxes for the roads maintenance, so we do not want to be 

taxed more for something we don't need.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

No public transportation in the US is profitable and is subsidized. This project will be no different. IE it’s a waste of money. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study. The 

analysis shows that operation of this high speed rail service would be profitable, as is typical of high speed rail lines in heavily-populated corridors such as this.
10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

This is BORING. We already have Amtrak and nobody rides it. Why not go with a HyperLoop? That would be an investment to get excited about. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

The Project's Purpose and Need (which appears in Section 3 of the Executive Summary) identifies the "Purpose of the Project is to improve intercity passenger 

travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region's transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and reliability through high-speed 

passenger rail system". This is a proven, well-established technology. FRA and GDOT wish to avoid delay in implementing service in the corridor while new 

technology is developed, tested, and refined.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe we have wasted enough money on AMTRAK over the past 30+ years. If this project is feasible let a private company invest their own 

money and keep the tax payers off the hook. Our deficit is too large to support this type of project. These always go way over budget anyway.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

The concept of a rail line that spans from GA to NC is beyond asinine. The cost far outweighs any benefit. Perhaps we should focus on our internal 

issues before lining the pockets of whatever contractors and officials are wanting this ridiculous expenditure of a project.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Do not like the whole idea. Too much money. Go get on a plane. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I beleive this is a bad idea and a waste of our tax dollars .ga cant even fix the roads and tracks they alright have. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a waste of taxpayer money. The demand is and will be far too low compared to the cost of building the track and infrastructure. This old 

idea of fixed point to point construction is highly inefficient and does not accurately predict travel preferences years into the future. So, drop this 

idea.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.
10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I am against this proposal because I do not believe a high speed rail project is a viable alternative to other less costly alternatives. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Waste of money. We need a train system in the city first. Expand Marta!!!! Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a terrible idea and a financial blunder that makes no economical sense. There are many different less costly options than a high speed rail 

project. Look at every high speed rail project in the United States and they are all failures. Why even hate time talking about such a project.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study. The 

analysis shows that operation of this high speed rail service would be profitable, as is typical of high speed rail lines in heavily-populated corridors such as this.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Hello. My name is Timothy Scipio and I am an active resident of Tuxedo Park. Our community is along one of the corridor options for this high speed 

rail. As a member of our HOA, we are actively voting against the option of the high speed rail option through Greenville.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Please DO NOT run that thing this way!!! Keep the traffic and congestion out of Athens! Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

No to this Atlanta-Charlotte rail. Save taxpayer money. Airlines are faster, the infrastructure is already in place and being utilized. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I do not approve. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.
10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

This is NOT ny. la. or chicago... AXE it altogether. We don't want nor need this crap in the deep south. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Way too expensive! Move on. Nothing to see here! Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Total waste of money. Especially since there is an airport in both Charlotte, NC & in Atlanta,GA ... Cheap to get on a small puddle jumper plane to 

get from one place to the other. No need for an expensive rail line between these two locations.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

To whom it may concern; I was flabbergasted to hear of a proposal to spend 15.1 BILLION tax dollars for a high speed rail project. Without wasting 

to much of your time it is one of the single worst ideas I have heard in recent history and am completely opposed to building it or spending more on 

studying it. Cease and desist forthwith. Sincerely, Mark Holzkamm

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Boston to NYC best known for speed of failures and rising costs. My favorite comment was in response to Public Hearing concerns about crossings 

used by school buses. CT shoreline too congested to safely lower gates. Response: Buy shorter buses and move pupils closer to drivers. Sad. There 

was more.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I'm sorry, but i see nothing good coming from this project. I don't need a high speed option go get from Atlanta to Charlotte. I'm OK with how long 

it takes to get to Charlotte now, and i'm not willing to lose more green spaces to something like this which is not needed

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

This project will be just as wasteful and inefficient as the California High Speed Rail Project. Please do not waste my money on this boondoggle. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Have you looked at the success of the Atlanta Street Car Project? This project will be the same, a billion dollar waist. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I do NOT wish to have this High Speed rail coming through my neighborhood. Use the I-85 corridor Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

no we dont need a rail corridor to charlotte, and i wasnt aware of any open house meetings on this so far but i might attend if given enough notice. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Our state can't even get Marta rail expanded. Why do this state allow voters to vote on mass transit but can put up toll lanes or roads without 

public vote? It is like paying taxes to build the roads then charging is residents to use it. Scrap this plan and connect the Georgia regions with highspeed rail first. 14 Billion dollars wouldn't even be the price for doing that.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Waste of money Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a waste of tax payer money. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

While it may be nice to have something like that, it takes me 4 hours to drive there from Atlanta. Spending $15 billion to shave two hours off a 4 

hour drive doesn’t seem like a good use of taxpayer money. If it was an 8 hour drive in 4 hours, that would have a better reason to look into it.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I am not in favor of a high speed railway cutting through the Braselton/Hoschton area. This would severely inhibit the productive growth of 

residences In this area. It would also negatively impact traffic as drivers would either need to reroute or deal with even more congestion to avoid 

rails. Find another path for this train!

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I think it would be a terrible waste of tax-payer money just like the HOV lanes and reversible lanes. Don’t do it!!!!!!!! Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

15 Billion while traffic fixes are being delayed in the Atlanta area? What's more urgent, fixing the gridlock here or building this unnecessary project 

at this absurd cost that will probably be more like 25 billion with cost over runs: a route that takes 28 minutes to fly and as little as 3 to 3 and a half 

hours to drive. Whose crazy idea was this? And how much money did the study cost? This will never happen.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Stop with the trains. Stop with the trains. Stop with the trains. For the love of all things good in the world, Stop with the trains. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Fixed guideway is no way to move people in 2020 and beyond. Stop the madness and wasteful spending. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

There should be no rail between Charlotte and Atlanta. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I say a Big NO for high speed rail service to ATL. We need to put our money into our own community. Like schools, teachers, housing. There are 

already several options to get to ATL Bring the Light Rail to Gastonia and Mooresville to ease local traffic first. Make it easier for local people to 

expand their area to work on the city of CLT.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

This is an idiotic waste of taxpayer funds. Focus on Georgia transit with out tax dollars. We've seen the 'bullet train' scam out in California...don't 

bring that to our Great State!

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

The money that would be spent on this project would be better spent on Traffic flow problems here in Georgia. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

We must first fix our infrastructure streets Plumbing sewer water before we even think about this project Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

There is not a rail line that Amtrack runs that can break even, unless it is in the northeast corridor. This will be an incredible waste of money, and 

will require taxpayer funding for multiple decades, if it ever breaks even. Money would be much better spent on other modes of transportation

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study. The 

analysis shows that operation of this high speed rail service would be profitable, as is typical of high speed rail lines in heavily-populated corridors such as this.

9/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Please do NOT have the corridor go through Oconee County (Southern option). We don’t want ANY part of it. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the train would be a massive money pit. Still if any train runs the 85 corridor it must stop in Spartanburg and gville. Stopping in Anderson 

would be ok but Spartanburg and gville are a must. GSP in Spartanburg would be acceptable.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.
11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

My family’s Farm is adjacent to the CSX R/W in Colbert. Our farm, ponds, creeks, cattle and property would be greatly impacted, devalued and 

damaged by this development. We are strongly against it.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Please DO NOT proceed with the Greenfield route for the proposed high speed Atlanta / Charlotte railway. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I am concerned about the GreenField option. As a homeowner very near to the GSP area- I am flat out against this option. It feels like Georgia is 

coming in and deciding they don’t care if they take our land when their citizens will not experience much loss of private property. If this project 

starts, it will be massively delayed by Imminent Domain issues in SC.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield option for the railroad is not an option! This would go right through our neighborhood and would be detrimental to our livelihood as a 

family and community. Please do not consider the Greenfield option.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Do not want greenfield option!!! Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I do NOT want a high speed railway with the greenfield option. This is not going to help us in this already congested out soon to be overpopulated 

area. It will simply make travel that is already quite difficult even harder. Very few people from this area travel that route and therefore it will not 

get rid of traffic problems it will just add to them. Please rethink this option and put a stop to bringing a high speed railway to our backyards.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

NO to the Greenfield option!!!! Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I am aware that there are several potential routes for the railway. I am against the Greenfield line and hope that one of the alternative routes 

would be considered. Thank you for reviewing my feedback.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Please don’t consider the Greenfield project east of 85 for the rail line. While I’m in favor of the rail line, let’s not ruin our neighborhoods in the Five 

Forks area. It’s way overcrowded as is and our infrastructure has not kept up. All our roads are in terrible condition and some very narrow. The 

traffic is unbearable at times. Work on our infrastructure before you make a decision to make it even worse. Seems like all Greenville wants is 

hurried progress without looking at the big picture of traffic and road concerns.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Please do not choose the Greenfield option. This will directly impact my neighborhood/community area and we enjoy the 

nature/woods/community that is already here. Thank you

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

AGAINST GREENFIELD OPTION Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Please do not chose the option for the high speed rail to be close to the Enoree River neighborhoods. (Along Highway 14/Batesville/Anderson 

Ridge.) There is much private property there & more than enough congestion - with no plan to alleviate in sight. Many of us purchased homes in 

Pelham Falls (the Enoree River literally runs along it) for its serenity. Choose the path less traveled...please!

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I object to the greenfield option. As a neighboring homeowner, it will have an impact on a highly residential area in and around the Five Forks area. 

To me the options along already existing tracks presents less impact on existing home and property owners.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I am opposed to a railway through or near Five Forks and/or rhe Enoree River in the Greenville/Greer cities of South Carolina. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

The idea of a high speed rail is great but we DO NOT want the greenfield option. That option will go through private land near our homes and 

schools. Our opinion is to follow 85 or the other tacks that are already there.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield option is not okay with me. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I am strongly against the greenfield line option. This would significantly impact many people’s quality of life in enjoyment of our property which we 

have worked so hard for. I am concerned about the environmental impact, traffic, and noise pollution the project would cause.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Do not choose Greenfield option. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I noticed that the Greenfield Route seems to come very close to our house and am Strongly opposed to this being built near where we live. I do not 

think it is wise to increase traffic to Greenville in general with any kind of rail line. As it is, our infrastructure is already struggling to keep up with the 

growth without this added rail line. NO from us!!!!

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

We oppose the Greenfield Corridor alternative, as it would run right through our backyard and destroy our neighborhood property values. We are 

at Batesville Rd and Hwy 14. The track would run along the Enoree River at that point. Which borders our beautiful neighborhood of 400 houses, 

Pelham Falls.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

The geenfield railway is not currently laid out in the best configuration. There is enough country open land to avoid going through or directly 

against the many neighborhoods that are on the current path that is laid out.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield option not okay Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Strongly oppose the Greenfield Corridor option as it directly impacts my neighborhood, personal property, and routes to and from school and work. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I am completely opposed to the Greenfield option for the railway. People are not going to want to stay here or move into this area near a railway. 

stick to I85 or along an existing railroad.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Phase 2 study should be focused on utilizing existing transportation corridors and not running through rural areas. Greenfield routing should not be 

considered.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Opposed to Greenfield option. Live close to the Enoree and would disrupt our neighborhood and commuting to and from work and school Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

This plan affects far too many residences in an area that is developing, not commercially, but with neighborhoods. A high speed rail would 

negatively impact the neighborhood environment, decrease property values, and disrupt the peace and tranquility for which many of its residents 

located here.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Oppose the Greenfield corridor Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Oppose the corridor following the Enoree river between neighborhoods at Vines Creek. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Very much opposed to cutting into suburban area not otherwise on a highway or railway. The Greenfield option does just this - straight into the 

Enoree river and my back yard! This is beautiful natural habitat that you would disrupt when you have two other options that would stay on a 

current system or with the highway. Please do not move forward with the Greenfield option!

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

Written 

Comment

2 options without much takings and one that will ruin a peaceful suburban/rural area - the Greenfield line. Please do not go the Greenfield line.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

The Enoree is basically In my back yard. We have a ton of wild life and natural resources here we don’t want to lose. We are very opposed to this rail 

line going in behind our homes! This is not something any of us here want and it is a disaster for the environment and the natural resources! Please 

do not allow this rail line near us or the Enoree! No to greenfield line rail!

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Reading that the Greenfield option is the preferred route, how can the impact on developing counties such as Jefferson County and the destruction 

of family neighborhoods and property values be mitigated against a ridership that will provide zero financial benefit to the county or those who will 

be displaced or see investments become devalued. Other corridors with existing right of way already exist without the negative environmental or 

negative financial impact this proposal places on the taxpayer in these regions that will gain no benefit.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

NO. I live about 1.5 miles from proposed greenfield route. I found out about this last night. The meetings should be held in locations where the 

lines are being proposed. I am adamantly against any high speed rail line through north east GA, but especially against one that would travel 

through quiet farming communities. I foresee nothing but problems for the citizens that will have to live with this in their backyard. The local papers 

should have been notified about these meetings so that they could have let the residents of these areas know what was being proposed.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.
10/12/2019 Web 

Comment

I want it to be understood and stated that our area (being Anderson area I-85) has already been through enormous negative changes to our farm 

and surrounding. Our area is sought after for the peace and being rural. We purchased our horse farm 15 years ago specifically to be in a quiet area 

due to the nature and inherent risk of horses and riding due to their skiddish nature. I would fear liability issues with my lesson kids. Now we have 

numerous neighborhoods being built all around us and a new huge plant being built right beside Brookstone Meadows golf course brining in 18 

wheeler truck traffic like crazy. This area of Anderson School District One is already unhappy with changes in our area and I am absolutely certain 

there would be intense resistance from this community. Please consider my strong feelings on this. I will share this information with other leaders in 

my community and be sure we all attend the community meeting. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Would make more sense to run rail to Florida than Charlotte. Oppose this senseless venture. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a national 

rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I see no need for this. I would rather see it between Raleigh and charlotte..lets concentrate on our own state first Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a 

national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the money would be better spent building a rail system around the metro area where it is needed most. Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.
10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

This desire to build rapid rail to Charlotte is terribly misplaced. The desire should be to improve the rail system for the city of Atlanta and its suburbs - 

 where 6 million people sit gridlocked every day because no one is funding or planning a better, more comprehensive rail system for our city. Spend 

some time in New York, D.C., MInneapolis, Boston, etc. to see successful transit systems in action. It is a pleasure to visit and do business in those 

cities and have no need of a car. I've never heard ANYONE in Atlanta say, "Boy, I sure wish I could go to Charlotte by rail today!" Instead, people are 

cursing because they've missed another of their child's soccer games or the start of a show, or are late for work again because they're stuck in 

traffic. Expand the rail system in Atlanta! Never mind Charlotte!

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Local transportation is beyond the scope of this Project.It should be noted that Atlanta area commuter rail service sharing the 

high speed rail tracks can be considered in a Tier 2 analysis.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Why is this under consideration? What is the demand for this rail route? It seems that this is another waste of taxpayer money for a project that 

won’t be self-supporting through actual ridership. Why don’t you consider expanding local rail service to Clayton County first? You already have a 

station and parking garage going unused next to Clayton State University that would be a far more beneficial route for people.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

 The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Local transportation is beyond the scope of this Project.It should be noted that Atlanta area commuter rail service sharing the 

high speed rail tracks, which could serve Clyton County can be considered in a Tier 2 analysis. The analysis shows that operation of this high speed rail service 

would be profitable, as is typical of high speed rail lines in heavily-populated corridors such as this.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Are the people who vote to approve this willing to pay the difference from their own pockets when ridership fees are not enough to cover cost of 

construction and operation. The world has enough trains that people don’t ride.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study. The 

analysis shows that operation of this high speed rail service would be profitable, as is typical of high speed rail lines in heavily-populated corridors such as this.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

After reading the alternatives and projected costs, I believe this is not a good use of funds. We need to use that money to improve surface roads and 

existing highways instead. Commercial truck traffic will continue to grow as consumption of goods increase so we need viable and realistic road 

improvements. A train system is a nice to have however you can not deliver goods on it to stores and businesses as the rails will not go to where 

they need them. Also it would do nothing to help the current roads

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a waste of resources. Outside of the NY/DC corridor, nearly every passenger rail line requires huge annual subsidies. Why would you think 

this will be different? Why would I drive 45min to rail station, wait 30-45min for train to leave on 2.5hr trip, take the time to rent a car in Charlotte 

to complete my journey, all of which would take the same amount of time for me to drive directly to my destination? Use the money to widen I85, which is 15 years overdue.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study. The 

analysis shows that operation of this high speed rail service would be profitable, as is typical of high speed rail lines in heavily-populated corridors such as this.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

DO NOT WASTE MONEY ON HIGH SPEED RAIL SYSTEM FROM ATLANTA TO CHARLOTTE. Fix 85 and add an 80mph express lane for hybrids and 

electric cars...boom. 15 billion saved. Include electric shuttles for those needing public transit. We ALL know 15 billion really means 20+ billion and 

years of delays. I can think of a lot more pressing needs for that kind of money than bragging rights to an unnecessary high speed rail line. I can only 

imagine the corruption in awarding the contracts for this little gem.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.
10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

About the largest and dumbest expenditure to keep a heartbeat. Kill this idiocy. Atlanta to Charlotte has ZERO of the ties of any of the Northeastern 

cities that require transiting from or to Philly or NYC or Boston. This is stupid.Widen the highway. Make getting on and off safer. Develop more train 

traffic of truck products, already in place.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe it would be in the best interest of the citizens if the line had a stop in Anderson. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will remain a 

part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. 

Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alterna^ve’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

A stop in Asheville would be nice and valuable to the region. Not only do we feel very isolated out here in the mountains due to the lack of public 

transportation to other major cities with airports, but tourism in this area has increased drastically and is projected to do so even more in the future.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Project's Purpose and Need (which appears in Section 3 of the Executive Summary) identifies the "Purpose of the Project is to improve intercity passenger 

travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region's transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and reliability through high-speed 

passenger rail system". This is a proven, well-established technology. FRA and the Southeast Corridor states believe that high speed rail will be quickly 

embraced when it is available. High-speed and intercity passenger rail service in several corridors in the Southeast is in various stages of planning. 

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

This rail line needs to happen and come through Anderson SC Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will remain a 

part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. 

Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I'd like to see a stop in Anderson. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will remain a 

part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. 

Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I think is a fantastic idea to make them pass through Tucker Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will remain a 

part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. 

Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

Need to put the station in around the Simpsonville/Fountain Inn area; like SC-417/SC-146 intersection or SC-101/SC-146 intersection. Then have a 

spur line from that station to GSP or a shuttle service to GSP. Train needs to have over an average speed of over 200 mph including the time at 

stops along the route and ample trains (1 or more per hour during no peak hours and every 15 min during the morning and evening rush hour 

windows) or it will never be seen as better than driving. Station parking should be free or it will lose the financial benefit of using vs a car.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will remain a 

part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. 

Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

Why not straight up I20 , connecting colleges, businesses and the capital of SC?. Better climate and splits the state allowing the possibilty of feeder 

lines to Columbia.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will remain a 

part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. 

Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Project's Purpose and Need (which appears in Section 3 of the Executive Summary) identifies the "Purpose of the Project is to improve intercity passenger 

travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region's transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and reliability through high-speed 

passenger rail system". This is a proven, well-established technology. FRA and the Southeast Corridor states believe that high speed rail will be quickly 

embraced when it is available. High-speed and intercity passenger rail service in several corridors in the Southeast is in various stages of planning. 

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I see nothing for York county citizens. We would still have to go to C"lotte airport. To do that, we might as well catch a flight. Is this going to stop at 

all the extra cities in #1 or just travel nearby? If not actually serving the cities, choose the faster route. If serving all the cities, use the route with the 

most stops, more passengers would use it. But if you have to travel very far to use it, i think people might choose to fly instead. I would like to see a 

route plan serving York county, SC. After all, travelers going to and from our new PANTHERS' headquarters will need it.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will remain a 

part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. 

Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. York County could be served by a S. Gastonia station along the 

Greenfield Corridor Alternative. 

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

If, I'm not mistaken, Norfolk Southern has a parallel right of way in Cherokee County, just past the Spartanburg County line where tracks used to run 

years ago.....that could save money to procure property, if that right of way still exists and where it starts and ends......

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative 

because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative because its geometry 

limited maximum speed, causing longer travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of ridership. More 

than one Tier II study may be required prior to construction to define the corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and 

detailed environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier 

access to the service. 

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Please add Augusta Georgia as a stop Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Project's Purpose and Need (which appears in Section 3 of the Executive Summary) identifies the "Purpose of the Project is to improve intercity passenger 

travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region's transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and reliability through high-speed 

passenger rail system". This is a proven, well-established technology. FRA and the Southeast Corridor states believe that high speed rail will be quickly 

embraced when it is available. High-speed and intercity passenger rail service in several corridors in the Southeast is in various stages of planning. 
10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I support the project. I hope it will have a stop in downtown greenville or a light rail link from Downtown to the main route very important that the 

high density downtown have rail access to the route

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

This proposed high speed rail line definitely needs to come as close as possible to downtown Greenville Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Stops in downtown Greenville and near the airport at GSP are critical in Upstate SC Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I recommend having the Greenfield line stop in Rock Hill/ Fort Mill. One of the fastest growing areas in the entire country. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

 The Project's Purpose and Need (which appears in Section 3 of the Executive Summary) identifies the "Purpose of the Project is to improve intercity 

passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region's transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and reliability through 

high-speed passenger rail system". This is a proven, well-established technology. FRA and the Southeast Corridor states believe that high speed rail will be 

quickly embraced when it is available. High-speed and intercity passenger rail service in several corridors in the Southeast is in various stages of planning. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Why not have the red line stop at the Greenville-Spartanburg Int. Airport as well? It is already going very close to it, and would add more 

trasportation options/flexibility than just having the green line stop at the airport.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

PLEASE do not add a stop to Suwanee. Lawrenceville is a better alternative. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

An Atlanta-Charlotte route through Winterville would be a plus for northern Georgia. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

If this High speed Rail is built. Is it gonna make a stop in Greenville/ Spartanburg? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Can't really tell the difference between the location of these options, but I think there should be planned stops near the historic districts and parks. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/15/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the corridor should not exclude the following: the Atlanta Airport, the Multi Model Passenger Terminal, Athens, Clemson, Greenville, 

Greenville Airport, Spartenburb, Charlotte, and the Charlotte Gateway Airport. I think including both Clemson and UGA would be essential to any 

corridor considered. Thanks for looking into it!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/13/2019 Web 

Comment

The proposed station in Athens. Do you have a good idea where it would be located at or is it still too early? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/7/2019 Web 

Comment

From the map it runs through Cherokee County, SC, but there are no stops. Shouldn’t have at least one? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Definitely need a SC upstate stop. Certainly downtown Greenville or GSP would make sense from a density and people standpoints, but it looks like 

something slightly outside town would be cheaper and keep the speed in high speed. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Ideally the high speed rail should connect Atlanta airport, Greenville Spartanburg airport, downtown Greenville, Charlotte Airport. Travel time of 

4:35-5:34 using Southern Crescent route would be a deterrent to use. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Please serve downtown Greenville! Take freights out of the cities and serve the population densities where they live. If I have to take a shuttle to 

the train station, I might as well go to the airport. Build a hybrid of greenfield but include Anderson, Greenville, and Spartanburg. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Consideration should be given to moving the proposed Anderson SC station to a location between Clemson University and City of Anderson. This 

would make the line more convenient to more potential riders. This would allow for a more straight route to the Greenville Spartanburg Airport 

proposed station while making the rail more accessible. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Court Reporter

This is about station placement. If any of the stations did need to be eliminated, I would say it would be the Downtown Atlanta one. The placement 

of that, the cost to build it, seems to be the highest. A northern perimeter stop in Doraville and the airport station still makes this transit accessible. 

So while a Downtown Atlanta stop is preferred, it could be eliminated with minimal effects to the project's success.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

How will stations in Atlanta or Greenville be built? My home town of tucker stands to greatly benefit but realistate in Atlanta and Greenville is 

rather expensive. Also if the I85 corridor were used, how would space be allocated in urban areas. These are all things that I presume are answered 

in the 2008 study of course. If this plan went ahead, would more local trains like Lawrenceville to Heathfield-Jackson via Tucker and Atlanta be 

operated, as this would likely be a popular corridor if the price were set right.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

The cheapest most convenient option - the Crescent line gets my vote. However with these modifications: (1) we need a spur to Athens (Gainesville-

->Athens) in which case I support the Gainesville-Suwanee-Doraville-Atl approach because it will interconnect with MARTA (2) there must be DIRECT 

connectivity to Greenville-Spartanburg Int airport whichever route is chosen and (3) OMIT Toccoa and Greer stations (the less stations the better)

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

The Southeast high-speed rail corridor plan should include some kind of connection to the Myrtle Beach area. There are a number of people, like 

my husband, who travel weekly to Atlanta for work. Flying is beyond expensive. Traveling by car means overnight stays and time away from family. 

To have the opportunity to catch a high speed train would allow people to have access to additional jobs that they otherwise my not be able to 

take. For people who do have travel, it would cut down on expenses and decrease the amount of time spent away from families. It would also 

benefit the tourist industry in the Myrtle Beach area allowing easier access from other parts of SC, Georgia and up and down the east coast. Access 

to high speed train from Myrtle Beach would also help alleviate the traffic on the already congested highways and interstates. Please consider 

adding a stop in the Myrtle Beach area.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Project's Purpose and Need (which appears in Section 3 of the Executive Summary) identifies the "Purpose of the Project is to improve intercity passenger 

travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region's transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and reliability through high-speed 

passenger rail system". This is a proven, well-established technology. FRA and the Southeast Corridor states believe that high speed rail will be quickly 

embraced when it is available. High-speed and intercity passenger rail service in several corridors in the Southeast is in various stages of planning. 

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

If this is simply a question of whether or not there should be a high-speed rail connection between Charlotte and Atlanta, then the answer is an 

unequivocal yes. If the question is whether this connection should take priority over other connections, then the answer is almost certainly a "no". 

First, neither "city" is a destination - as a Charlotte resident, I have no interest in voluntarily traveling to Atlanta. I also see no reason why somebody 

in Atlanta would choose to travel here. Second, neither city has earned any belief that their residents would willingly pry their selves away from 

their cars. Both locations are designed exclusively around the auto, with transit given a half-hearted nod. If only a minuscule portion of the 

population of either location would consider consistently traveling within their own town by any means other than an auto, is there any reason to 

believe that they would opt to travel between cities by rail? Third, both "destinations" would be the end of the line. If I travel by high-speed rail 

from here to Atlanta, then... I'm stuck in Atlanta. If an Atlantan travels here by high-speed rail, then they're stuck here. However, if a connection 

was created between either location and DC, then that would open up all Acela destinations. High-speed rail between Charlotte and Atlanta? Yes. 

But only after connections have been established between more worthwhile places.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Use revised standard response. Add: The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and 

Charlotte via the Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has 

developed a national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors.
9/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Citizens of Augusta-Thomson GA-part of the Central Savannah River Area (CSRA) requesting inclusion of Atlanta-Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor via 

existing CSX rail tracks; expand passenger rail service into middle Georgia where it has not been available for 50 years. Augusta GA population 

growth should be considered in your current studies of planning and is being requested herein.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Project's Purpose and Need (which appears in Section 3 of the Executive Summary) identifies the "Purpose of the Project is to improve intercity passenger 

travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region's transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and reliability through high-speed 

passenger rail system". This is a proven, well-established technology. FRA and the Southeast Corridor states believe that high speed rail will be quickly 

embraced when it is available. High-speed and intercity passenger rail service in several corridors in the Southeast is in various stages of planning. 

Written 

Comment

Great project with three distinctly different and interesting alternatives. Would love to see consideration/inclusion of spur lines into major 

population centers off of a Greenfield line that stays as straight as possible (avoiding GSP). Similar to high speed in Europe that stay out of cities and 

preserve high speeds/low travel time. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Finally. The Atlanta highway hub has been and continues to be an abysmal quagmire of vehicle traffic jams. In spite of the Peach Pass lane. It gets 

jammed too! And dealers just keep selling cars! And don't dwell on just one HSR spoke. Run one southeast into Florida. And one west southwest. 

And one northwest. Just over 100 years ago, the horse and buggy was replaced by the automobile. It's been long past time for the automobile to 

go the way of the horse and buggy. HSR will create lots of jobs! Cut massive pollution! And make it a *pleasure* to travel again! And take a hint 

from the countries that have had HSR for quite a while now. They've designed it to be *1st class*. And I'll bet 100s of THOUSANDS of folks would be 

*happy* to pay good money to travel in comfort, while not being forced to navigate the constant quagmire of interstate traffic. Thank you for 

allowing me to comment. Please feel free to pass it along.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. 

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a 

national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

We need to provide real incentives for the potential travelers in terms of time savings and cost savings. Reducing the travel time from average of 

the closet to 250 mile trip from 3:30 hours to 2:06 would be a good way to start (total travel time of 1:30min or less will definitely do it for me). But 

if the proposed speed is not going to get us there in less than 3 hours, then as a driver, it is very likely I wouldn't take the ride. Also, we need to start 

thinking about high speed train to other more "popular" locations such Washington D.C, Miami FL or even New York City. I traveled constantly 

throughout the Europe and Asia, and it really hurts me to see how neglected our nation's rail system is.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

Ballpark time frame in which the final decision of the route will be made? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

How long would the project take to complete! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. The remaining steps include completing 

environmental analysis, design, railroad coordination, right-of-way acquisition, construction, operator selection, train acquisition, and commissioning. While 

some of these may overlap, the process will take a number of years.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

What is the timeline for this? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. The remaining steps include completing 

environmental analysis, design, railroad coordination, right-of-way acquisition, construction, operator selection, train acquisition, and commissioning. While 

some of these may overlap, the process will take a number of years.

Written 

Comment

I would have liked a description of Greenfield and even what state it is in. I will google it however when I am home. I am interested in knowing what 

or who would be displaced. Thank you for informing ordinary residents that this is being proposed. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

What year would the option be finished that would connect Charlotte to Atlanta in about 2 hours? Also, where can we find more information about 

the meeting schedule to discuss? There are huge concerns around the Light Rail around safety and I'd like to understand how they will be safe.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. The remaining steps include completing 

environmental analysis, design, railroad coordination, right-of-way acquisition, construction, operator selection, train acquisition, and commissioning. While 

some of these may overlap, the process will take a number of years. High Speed Rail has no at-grade roadway crossings. It is extremely safe.

9/30/2019 Web 

Comment

Hello, How many years before the shovels hit dirt? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. The remaining steps include completing 

environmental analysis, design, railroad coordination, right-of-way acquisition, construction, operator selection, train acquisition, and commissioning. While 

some of these may overlap, the process will take a number of years. A Service Development Plan (SDP) was not developed for this Tier 1 EIS, but will be 

developed during a future Tier 2 environmental review, and will outline how the proposed high-speed rail service will be operated, dispatched and 

maintained. 

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

what is the route of the proposed rail Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Charlotte media argues the Crescent option would be the least expensive ($2.3B) because it uses existing track currently owned by Norfolk 

Southern, but also says this route would "draw the fewest passengers." It also argues the maximum speed on the Crescent is 79-110 mph, which 

would not significantly improve travel times. By contrast, the I-85 option would cost $15.4B and trains would speed along at 180 mph. The 

Greenfield option would cost $8.4, and trains could travel the max 220 mph. My question is this: Are these facts and figures the best arguments 

for/against choosing an option? I live in Greenville and would prefer to NOT have the stop at GSP.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

What are the main factors that are differentiating the 3 options? What makes each one attractive? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Please see Chapter 2 of the Draft EIS for a 

description of the three alternatives.
10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

What will be the stops? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Which communities would be responsible for the cost of this project? Where would the line connect after Atlanta? Why would we install high speed 

rail when we're still so behind installing positive train control on our current system?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Currently, PTC is fully implemented and in 

operation on all required Class I route-miles.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenfield route doesn't make any sense to me. It is routed around the major upstate cities with a stop at GSP airport (not exactly a major hub 

airport). Shouldn't a high-speed rail service connect city centers which gives it a competitive advantage versus air travel?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Written 

Comment

Are there plans for incorporating bike trails or other alternatives along the rail corridors? Are plans for physical and systems security being 

developed at this phase? 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

 Bike trails are not part of the Purpose and Need for the Project, but could potentially be considered along portions of the corridor during subsequent 

planning. The system will need to meet strict Federal Railroad Administration saftety regulations as well as the operating rules of the rail operator. Existing 

high-speed rail systems have proven to be extremely safe.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Hello I would like to ask that the Greenfield route currently being considered as a possible route for the high speed rail NOT be considered. The 

other two routes would not cause mass disruptions to our suburban area nor would it lower our property value. Thank you. Sara Rudolph

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern 

Crescent because the corridor’s geometry limited maximum speeds, generating travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and 

attracting lower levels of ridership. FRA dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while the I-85 performed better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, the 

geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also 

expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South Carolina. Finally, the I-85 presents engineering challenges 

due to corridor constrains around Greenville, SC that would require the Project Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the 

Corridor Alterna^ve’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I am against the proposed Greenfield line as it will DESTROY many established neighborhoods that are located along this proposed line. I do not 

think the analysis has taken into account all the families this would affect. The line goes right through many neighborhoods. Wetlands and Wildlife 

that live along the Enoree would be disrupted as well. The I-85 corridor would be much, much less disruptive.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Two years ago, we built and moved into our dream house at 105 Ledgestone Way in Greer, South Carolina. We love the area. It is quiet, the schools 

are excellent, and the community in general is great. At the time we purchased the land, we did not realize that we would come to live in the most 

affluent area in South Carolina. With the Greenfield Corridor alternative that I admittedly just learned about today via Nextdoor, I was met with 

complete surprise to see the rail path moving within 0.25 miles of my subdivision, Ledgestone. While I am a strong supporter of public 

transportation alternatives, I am extremely concerned about the disruption in the area from both construction and ongoing noise. I am concerned 

about the diminished property value that will likely accompany the disruption. I am concerned about the environmental impact and the wildlife 

that is already strained by growth. I am concerned about the potential traffic impact at roadways that are already exceeding capacity. I am 

concerned about public safety due to the near proximity of the proposed path to a fast-growing population center that your modeling likely hasn't 

accounted for. In summary, I believe that the proposal is taking away something from the community that cannot be restored. How will you 

ensure that our concerns are considered in your weighting system? As a taxpayer that will ultimately be funding the activity, how can you assure 

me that there will be compensation for the human impact in terms of health, environment, and financial well-being?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Will this project be championed by FRA or is GDOT the only project sponsor? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

who are the main sponsoring agencies and officials working on this project? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Contact information for both GDOT and 

FRA can be found on the signature page of the Draft EIS.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

In order to decrease pollution, better public transportation must be developed linking major cities in efficient manners. Would the new rail use 

alternative fuels for lower missions?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. 

Use of electric power propulsion is being considered. Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can 

accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no 

emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation 

and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 environmental review. 
Written 

Comment Looking at options Southern Crescent takes too long and stations are not AGAA/ADA compliant and do not connect with transit or direct road 

systems and should be omitted from further study. Greenfield does not create a regional transportation system is a huge threat for immeniant 

domain to land owners providing no true access in South Carolina. I see no benefit of SC and not support this option. The I-85 option seems best at 

first glance to create a regional transportation system that has potential to benefit GA-SC-Nc. The proposed stops could connect to other transit 

systems and potentially benefit business and tourism for all. Some questions not answered: Where along I-85 would this run? What properties 

would be impacted? Is elevated rail considered? Is ABA and ADA accessible design included? Will all SC stops be included? What is the ask financially 

for the state of SC? What is the carbon footprint and impact? How does this impact rivers and lakes? Do the speeds and times listed include these 

stops in SC, it seems responses from meeting only included GSP. When would proposed routes run - days of week, times of day? Would these 

benefit times needed in SC equally together? How is this determined? Concerns: Takeing business away from those along route and GSP airport 

equating to loss of revenue and jobs in SC; impact of safety and noise around lines; imminent domain concerns; if using existing amtrack/NS line 

cost to upgrade stations for ABA/ADA accessibility, road, pubic transit, parking, etc. makes this SC options unrealistic; health and safety impacts - 

loss of trees, greenspace, threat to water, noise; has the disability community been specifically involved in research and planning efforts now? What 

plans are there for the future? I am happy to assist in bringing disability leaders and organizations from all 3 states together to participate in ongoing 

processes. Please do not leave this critical piece out. Thank you. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. 

South Carolina DOT supports the Greenfield Alternative. More in-depth analysis of environmental impacts will occur during a Tier 2 study. The Project will 

need to comply with ADA regulations, including level boarding platforms, and other operational characteristics of the service, such as schedules, will be 

determined at a later stage of Project development. A Service Development Plan (SDP) was not developed for this Tier 1 EIS, but will be developed during a 

future Tier 2 environmental review, and will outline how the proposed high-speed rail service will be operated, dispatched and maintained. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Your Tier 1 study is yet to be published and the content on the Railway is limited to info graphics. Also the Map of Alternative routes does not work 

on your site at all. My concern is the environmental impact and overall displacement of acreage and wildlife along the routes when will this 

information be available?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. More in-depth analysis of environmental 

impacts will occur during a Tier 2 study.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

If properly utilized by citizens, what are the potential environmental benefits? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. More in-depth analysis of environmental 

impacts will occur during a Tier 2 study.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I am very concerned about the Greenfield option since our neighborhood (as well as many others) borders the Enoree River, which seems to be very 

close to the projected route. I would be against such a project if it was within either visual or audible distance of our home.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development.

This Tier I EIS performed a desktop-level review of environmental impacts that would result from this Project and did not perform any fieldwork as part of this 

study. A future Tier 2 study will perform a detailed review, including performing fieldwork, to determine any environmental impacts that result from the 

Project. FRA and the Project Sponsor will work with stakeholders to develop appropriate mitigation strategies for any environmental impacts that result from 

the Project. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide the 

development of the study. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study. 

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

How many more trees are we gonna loose?? Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development.

This Tier I EIS performed a desktop-level review of environmental impacts that would result from this Project and did not perform any fieldwork as part of this 

study. A future Tier 2 study will perform a detailed review, including performing fieldwork, to determine any environmental impacts that result from the 

Project. FRA and the Project Sponsor will work with stakeholders to develop appropriate mitigation strategies for any environmental impacts that result from 

the Project. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide the 

development of the study. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study. 
10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I live in South Carolina near the proposed Greenfield Route. I own my historic home and almost 19 acres of forested land on Hwy 296 between the 

Enoree River and Brockman McCliman Rd. I would strongly object to the choice of the Greenfield Route. This area has seen many subdivisions for 

homes and neighborhoods. I purchased the land next to our home to protect the rural quality of the area and most importantly to preserve the 

mature forest containing a large variety of native trees. Some of the springs and a creek feeding the Enoree River are also on my property. I am also 

concerned about the environmental impact and about the traffic and neighborhoods in the path.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. More in-depth analysis of environmental 

impacts will occur during a Tier 2 study.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I would love for this to be a reality! As long as environmental impacts are completely considered. Most of my family are in the Atlanta area, but it is 

such a long drive and traffic is terrible! I believe if this is utilized, it would help with traffic and a lot of gas would be saved and emissions kept out of 

the air.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. More in-depth analysis of environmental 

impacts will occur during a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

What effects will this train have on the environment? Please consider carbon emissions , as passenger trains emit 14 Grams of CO2 per passenger 

mile . Railway Transport emissions are 80% less than cars and I think you should consider pros and cons as far as environmental effect as well!

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. More in-depth analysis of environmental 

impacts will occur during a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

With all the damage that we’ve done to the earth and the environment, we need to be intensely thoughtful of the environmental impact of 

everything and anything we do!! I admire the trains in Europe - the efficiency, regularity, reliability, and low environmental footprint they leave. I 

hope this project will place importance on those objectives.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. More in-depth analysis of environmental 

impacts will occur during a Tier 2 study.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

How will this impact the local wildlife? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. More in-depth analysis of environmental 

impacts will occur during a Tier 2 study.

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

How will this affect the green space along I85? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. More in-depth analysis of environmental 

impacts will occur during a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

The green corridor will be a massive impact on nature. On top of creating a lot of environmental issues it would require to take so much private 

property when there is already a corridor with 85 created to enable circulation. I dont see why we should consider the green corridor even as an 

option. Greenville is growing at a high rate, building more properties every minute and that green corridor could put in jeopardy even neighborhood 

that are not existing yet.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. More in-depth analysis of environmental 

impacts will occur during a Tier 2 study.
10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

I am opposed to the "Greenfield" Corridor. Please do not violate and blight some of the most beautiful countryside in the whole State of Georgia, 

South Carolina, and North Carolina. A highspeed rail in the Greenfield Corridor would introduce pollution (sound and light and etc.) and destroy 

historic properties and natural resources. It would be better to continue along established routes such as I-85 and the Silver Crescent. These areas 

have long established developement. I'd also like to add, that the proposed 2 1/2 hours from Atl to Charlotte is inaccurate. By the time someone 

travelled from their home to the Atlanta airport, went through security etc, waited, etc. - then travel on the train - then disembarked in Charlotte, 

grabbed an Uber, rented a car, got picked up, they would be beyond the 3.75 to 4.5 hours it takes to get there already by car. Not to mention they 

could just as easily have done this via air travel. Furthermore we do have very advanced telecommunications, a businessman can conduct a 

business meeting without physically being there. A high speed train from Atlanta to Savannah, along 1-20 or established routes would better 

serve the area. The long proposed brain-train from Emory to Athens would accomplish much. But Atl to Charlotte??? , this need/ desire to travel 

between the two are already well accomodated (and can be in the future. The "Greenfield" Corridor should not be considered; Let's not create 

more negative blight and environmetal scars across our beautiful countryside and earth. Keep the Greenfield corridor Green. PLease, Thank you, 

Jonathan W. LaCrosse, RA

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study. 

Service along I-20 or from Atlanta to Savannah was found to be inconsistent with the Project's Purpose and Need, although those needs are being considered 

in other planning being conducted by GDOT and the Federal Railroad Administration. Atlanta-Athens commuter trains could share tracks with the high-speed 

rail trains to Charlotte.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because it performed best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern 

Crescent because the corridor’s geometry limited maximum speeds, generating travel times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and 

attracting lower levels of ridership. FRA dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while the I-85 performed better than the Southern Crescent Alternative, the 

geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and attracting less ridership. The State DOTs also 

expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South Carolina. Finally, the I-85 presents engineering challenges 

due to corridor constrains around Greenville, SC that would require the Project Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the 

Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. Service along I-20 or from Atlanta to Savannah was found to be inconsistent 

with the Project's Purpose and Need, although those needs are being considered in other planning being conducted by GDOT and the Federal Railroad 

Administration. Atlanta-Athens commuter trains could share tracks with the high-speed rail trains to Charlotte.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

I have info from my neighborhood representative that the project is considering 3 possible routes (at least that affect my area in the Greenville SC 

vicinity east of I-85. 1 is a Greenfield, would involve obtaining some significant private property. The other 2 are not Greenfield. I am writing here to 

tell you the Greenfield option is NOT ok - not ok to disrupt lives and neighborhoods for the sake of your project. If you are going forward with 

studies please have some respect for those who could be affected - if the railway was planned to come through your backyard at your house - how 

would you feel about it? How would your family feel about it?

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the all electric Train would be the way to go. The impact on the long term for the diesel train just because more of an Issue, addressing the 

cost would be the next hurdle. I still think in today’s society you should put Environment impact over cost to an extent.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

I would really like this train to be electric. Lowering emissions from cars would be amazing, and it could adapt to a changing grid (renewable energy). 

I'd also like to be able to access it from Spartanburg area.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

While I am excited about the possibility of a high speed rail coming through Greenville. I am very concerned about the noise and vibration as well as 

increase in road congestion around the Simpsonville/Five forks SC area. And after reviewing the initial study, I understand the attractiveness of the 

greenfield route. But I don’t think you fully comprehend the rate of residential increase in the area you are proposing going through near GSP 

airport. I’m not sure you can maintain much speed at all through there and the rail crossings would cause gridlock at rush hour (it’s already close to 

that at rush hour anyway). The only way I could see this option being feasible is if you garantee an electric train. Because if you use diesel and 

Travel between Greenville and Atlanta is 2 hrs (this is an assumption based on the 2:48 time between Atlanta and Charlotte). Almost no one in 

Greenville is going to choose to leave behind their car to save 30 min that they’d lose waiting for the train to arrive anyway...If you’re going diesel 

you might as well use the I-85 route that way part of the appeal is it drops you at stations downtown in Greenville...that would make the 2:55 travel 

time a little easier to sell if they don’t need additional ground transportation. Although, with diesel the train itself is significantly more mosey at low 

speed and generates fumes, particulate, as well as maintenance. It’d be nice to finally have a truest high-speed rail with an electric train. I’m excited 

to see what you come up with.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. More in-depth analysis of environmental 

impacts will occur during a Tier 2 study.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I am very interested in this project, but I am curious as to why options like MagLev were not used? Japan utilizes a fantastic railway system for 

transport and I have been wanting to see something like that in the USA. I would like to see a few more options drawn up to make a proper decision 

on the project. I think the railway should come close to DT Greenville, but I like the idea of utilizing GSP because that area could use more 

development as a transportation hub. I think the city of Greenville can decide if they would like to branch off from that hub at GSP. Either way, I 

love the project and would only hope it gets completed within the next 10 years or so.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Project's Purpose and Need (which appears in Section 3 of the Executive Summary) identifies the "Purpose of the Project is to improve intercity passenger 

travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region's transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and reliability through high-speed 

passenger rail system". This is a proven, well-established technology. FRA and GDOT wish to avoid delay in implementing service in the corridor while new 

technology is developed, tested, and refined.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

1. A larger question is why the FRA is not envisioning using maglev trains as it lays completely new tracks? Why are we stuck with dated technology, 

when maglev trains are faster, cleaner, and less expensive to operate. It is shortsighted in the extreme for the FRA not to transition "high speed" rail 

to maglev trains, especially if the I-85 route is selected which requires much new track and a high price tag. 2. The point of the SEHSR is supposed 

to be PASSENGER usage and connecting communities, per your statement: "FRA is implementing this high-speed rail initiative through the HighSpeed Intercity Passenger Rail Program (HSIPR), created to address the nation’s transportation challenges by making strategic investments in an 

efficient network of passenger rail corridors connecting communities across the country." If this is truly the case, then the optimal route is the one 

that people in the communities between ATL and CLT would have easy access to and would use. Based on the ridership projections, this would be 

the I-85 route. Greenfield route, while projecting high ridership, is inaccessible to those of us who would use it to travel between communities in the 

Upstate (such as between Greenville and Spartanburg, where no bus service even exists for commuters!). I think the end-to-end travel time of the 

Crescent route makes it less appealing than the I-85 route (but still preferable to Greenfields because of access to people in 

communities/destinations.) I assume that the low ridership projections for Crescent are due to it being slow (and thus not a replacement for car or 

air travel between ATL and CLT). Which brings me back to (a) WHY NOT MAGLEV trains??, and (b) USE THE I-85 ROUTE.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed 

rail with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor 

Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well 

as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will 

remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on the project 

website. Project Sponsors and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 

Corridor Alternative performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum speeds, creating longer trips times and 

attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly through South 

Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 EIS. 

The Project's Purpose and Need (which appears in Section 3 of the Executive Summary) identifies the "Purpose of the Project is to improve intercity passenger 

travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region's transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and reliability through high-speed 

passenger rail system". This is a proven, well-established technology. FRA and GDOT wish to avoid delay in implementing service in the corridor while new 

technology is developed, tested, and refined.
10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to see a detailed map of the lines & know what the variable is? 1/2 mile, 1 mile etc for the rail locations & levels of sound along track? Is 

this an elevated track, ground level and what barriers would be in place to muffle noise? What hours would the trains run

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. The precise route for the rail line will be 

determined during a Tier 2 analysis, which will also include a more in-depth analysis of the environmental impacts of the Project as well as potential 

mitigation measures for those impacts. For more information on the noise analysis done for this Tier I EIS, please see Section 3.5 of the Draft EIS. 

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Has anyone researched or discussed an underground option? The state already owns the land, use I-85 as a guide. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Tier 1 EIS did not consider or evaluate an underground option for any of the Corridor Alternatives or sections of a Corridor Alternative. Tunneling costs are 

typically much higher than at-grade construction and, in some instances, alignments that are elevated on structure. Tunneling of sections of the corridor 

could be considered in Tier 2 environmental reviews if feasible, cost effective, or required to avoid existing obstacles. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Wait for HyperLoop to prove out and be perfected. Then Buy. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Project's Purpose and Need (which appears in Section 3 of the Executive Summary) identifies the "Purpose of the Project is to improve intercity passenger 

travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region's transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and reliability through high-speed 

passenger rail system". This is a proven, well-established technology. FRA and GDOT wish to avoid delay in implementing service in the corridor while new 

technology is developed, tested, and refined.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

What is being done to explore new tech solutions for passenger and freight like AirTrac. https://airtractransport.com/ How can a company like 

AirTrac participate in the process?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Project's Purpose and Need (which appears in Section 3 of the Executive Summary) identifies the "Purpose of the Project is to improve intercity passenger 

travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region's transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and reliability through high-speed 

passenger rail system". This is a proven, well-established technology. FRA and GDOT wish to avoid delay in implementing service in the corridor while new 

technology is developed, tested, and refined.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

The proposed rail for high speed corridor runs right by my house. We DO NOT want high speed passenger rail. We already have enough loud freight 

trains running by here at all hours of the day and night. Do not need more rail traffic. And i woukd attend a meeting if there were one nearby. A 

railway impacting NE Ga should have meetings IN NE Ga.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study. 

Freight trains, which are longer, slower and heavier, usually generate more noise than faster, shorter passenger trains. For more information on the noise 

analysis done for the Project, please see Section 3.5 of the Draft EIS. Sites for public meetings are normally centrally-located.

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Hello, Is the meeting facility close enough to the NC AMTRAK station to walk to this meeting or will a shuttle be provided? Robert Abney 

Mooresville, NC

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Sites for public meetings are normally centrally-located. Individuals are responsible for their own transportation. Sites for public meetings are normally 

centrally-located.
10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

This has not been very well communicated. the first I heard of it was in the Greenville paper on October 27. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

Following the federal legal advertisement requirements for public involvement, these meetings were advertised 30 days in advance of the meeting in the 

Atlanta Journal Constitution (AJC) starting on 9/25/19, the Charlotte Observer on 9/24/19, and The Greenville News on 9/25/19. A second round of legal 

notices were advertised a week in advance of the meeting in the AJC, Charlotte Observer, and The Greenville News. Additionally, NPR in Atlanta advertised 

the meetings on 10/22/19 on their morning radio show, and NPR in Charlotte hosted a one hour show on the Project and overall high speed in a program 

called "Charlotte Talks" on 10/23/19. News outlets and various social media posts were also included as a part of advertisements for the public meetings. All 

partners advertised the meetings. The meeting materials were also available online as well as in the DOT offices of each state through the public comment 

period. GDOT and FRA believe that overall communication of the Project public meetings was sufficient. 276 people signed in for the three public meetings, 

and over 2100 comments on the Project were submitted.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I learned about the public meeting in Atlanta too late to attend. Why did you schedule these meetings a mere 5 days after the press release 

announcing them? One might think that you deliberately want to squelch public comment.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. 

 Following the federal legal advertisement requirements for public involvement, these meetings were advertised 30 days in advance of the meeting in the 

Atlanta Journal Constitution (AJC) starting on 9/25/19, the Charlotte Observer on 9/24/19, and The Greenville News on 9/25/19. A second round of legal 

notices were advertised a week in advance of the meeting in the AJC, Charlotte Observer, and The Greenville News. Additionally, NPR in Atlanta advertised 

the meetings on 10/22/19 on their morning radio show, and NPR in Charlotte hosted a one hour show on the Project and overall high speed in a program 

called "Charlotte Talks" on 10/23/19. News outlets and various social media posts were also included as a part of advertisements for the public meetings. All 

partners advertised the meetings. The meeting materials were also available online as well as in the DOT offices of each state through the public comment 

period. 276 people signed in for the three public meetings, and over 2100 comments on the Project were submitted.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

what will be the cost per seat mile of a high speed rail to Charlotte and why does anyone think it offers a good ROI over air travel ? California spent 

100's of millions on high speed between LA and San Francisco and have NOTHING to show for it. None of these pie in the sky projects ever turn out 

to meet budget and this would be a gigantic waste of taxpayer money

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

A Tier 2 analysis will include an estimated cost for the overall Project. Detailed operating characteristics, including details on fares, will be determined much 

later. A Service Development Plan (SDP) was not developed for this Tier 1 EIS, but will be developed during a future Tier 2 environmental review, and will 

outline how the proposed high-speed rail service will be operated, dispatched and maintained. Operation of high-speed rail in major corridors, such as the 

Northeast Corridor and systems overseas, are profitable, and there is no operating deficit to finance.
10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a complete boondoggle - look at CA Hi Speed Rail disaster. Not enough of time difference to make it far better than auto. I lived in NE Corridor 

for 14 years and would drive from southern CT to Boston most of the time rather than take train. Who will cover the operating and capital deficits? 

Local taxpayers?? Issues: 1/ If you are on the train you need transportation to station at start and to final destination at other end - by the time you 

transfer what is the actual time savings? 2/ On the train, how much baggage will you be willing to drag? Can load a car easily. 3/ Family travel - 3-4 

people traveling in a car are still only buying 1 tank of gas - 3-4 tickets on HS Rail make the cost much higher than auto. 4/ Every politician along the 

route will want a station in exchange for access through the territory - how many stops will you allow (see NE Corridor trains.... even the Acela has 

multiple stops) 5/ Dedicated busses with comfortable seats, wifi etc can make the trip in competitive time frame, run far more frequently at far less 

cost. 6/ Compare total time for train with commercial flights - air travel is similar overall and probably cheaper than the train will ever be. You build 

1 airport and it can handle flights to everywhere - trains are a point to point infrastructure and will never get the traffic that you estimate. (nor will 

the cost be what you think...) As much as I love train travel - there is no way this will ever be a successful project. Unfortunately I can't be at the 

meeting in Charlotte as I am traveling, but with an MBA from Wharton in Transportation & Logistics I cannot see how this project will ever pay for 

itself - and the last thing anyone needs is another hole to sink money into.

As discussed in the Purpose and Need section the intent of the project is to provide time-competitive rail service as an alternative to the existing auto and air 

infrastructure in the region. It is not possible to provide infinite highway or air capacity. See exhibit 2-20 in Chapter 2 of the Draft EIS for potential travel times 

for the Corridor Alternatives. Operation of high-speed rail in major corridors, such as the Northeast Corridor and systems overseas, are profitable, and there is 

no operating deficit to finance. A Service Development Plan (SDP) was not developed for this Tier 1 EIS, but will be developed during a future Tier 2 

environmental review, and will outline how the proposed high-speed rail service will be operated, dispatched and maintained.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

I think it would be beneficial if this line connected in some way to the new Braves stadium. I know the area between Atlanta and Charlotte has a lot 

of Braves fans and if this was a viable option for getting to a game it could help increase riders.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Connections to local attractions in the 

Atlanta area will be identified in the Tier 2 analysis.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

In my view, a stop at the Doraville (or Chamblee) MARTA station is vital to the usability, and ultimate success of this corridor. Both the I-85 and 

Crescent options provide for such a stop, and I support them. In addition, the I-85 corridor is the least expensive option and accordingly the most 

"doable". 110 mph is not perfect, no; but the perfect 220 mph option should not enemy of the good 110 mph option. Thank you.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. 

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip 

times. Electric trains have lower operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The higher speed generates more 

ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 2 

environmental review. 

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

I'm interested to know how this will be connected to MARTA and of course cost. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. The Tier 2 analysis will include an updated 

cost estimate and will discuss potential connections to MARTA.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

If CSX presently owns the right-of-way (ROW) behind my house, and this project moves forward, who will be responsible for ROW maintenance, 

coordination of passenger and freight traffic, and mediation between the two entities (CSX and passenger rail authority) when disputes arise over 

various challenges with either transportation mode?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

GDOT anticipates that the Preferred Alternative project would acquire right-of-way for construction of new dedicated passenger rail tracks. It is not known 

whether they will be adjacent to existing tracks. By being completely separate the need for ongoing coordination will be minimized. A Service Development 

Plan (SDP) was not developed for this Tier 1 EIS, but will be developed during a future Tier 2 environmental review, and will outline how the proposed highspeed rail service will be operated, dispatched and maintained. A Service Development Plan (SDP) was not developed for this Tier 1 EIS, but will be developed 

during a future Tier 2 environmental review, and will outline how the proposed high-speed rail service will be operated, dispatched and maintained.
10/10/2019 Web 

Comment

Switzerland has rail lines that take passengers in box cars, but ALSO PEOPLE IN VEHICLES through the alps. People Love their cars when they get to 

where they will be. I highly recomend and encourage you to benchmark, copy and paste the very successful and pleasureable rail travel in europe if 

w ewant this to be the best and most used form of high speed transportation

The Preferred Alternative is the use of high-speed rail of the same type as used in most European countries, as well as several other countries in the world. 

Carrying cars on trains requires special railcars which are not capable of safe operation at the high speeds (up to 220 mph) anticipated in this FEIS/ROD. 

Experience in other parts of the world where service carrying private cars on slower trains has been offerred is that its popularity has declined over time and 

most of them have been discontinued. An exception has been Amtrak Auto Train, a train that transports cars and their owners from Lorton, VA to Sanford, FL. 

While the trian is limited to 70 mph (less than other passenger trains on the line) the service is popular, particularly with people relocating for months at a 

time. 

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Why don't you use this opportunity to benefit smaller towns that need a boost? GSP is growing just fine but the smaller towns struggle, yet you 

want to use tax payers money to cover it.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I would like to know EXACTLY where this proposed rail line will go. Also, it seems like it will primarily benefit those in non-rural areas, while those of 

us in rural areas that are near or on this rail will suffer. Please let me know if I am mistaken.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. The precise route for the line will be 

determined during the Tier 2 analysis.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

I like the idea but also like the idea of something from Augusta to Atlanta and want to be sure we have s demand for it I hate when things don't turn 

out popular

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Atlanta-Charlotte route via Augusta and Columbia was found to be inconsistent with the Project's Purpose and Need and were removed from 

consideration. However, there are oither passenger rail studies in the region. A route from Atlanta to Columbia (via Augusta) could take advantage of the 

Greenfield Alternative, sharing track from Atlanta to Athens.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

Please include a line from Charleston through Columbia to Greenville. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

 The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a 

national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1.

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

How about rail service from Savannah to Atlanta and Jesup to Virginia. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a 

national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1.
10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

Can you please extend it up to Florida? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a national 

rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Why Atlanta to Charlotte? Why not Atlanta to Savannah, Raleigh or Chattanooga?? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a national 

rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. A Tier 1 Combined Final 

Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision (Tier 1 FEIS/ROD) was issued for the Atlanta-Chattanooga corridor in August, 2017, and is available 

on both GDOT's and the FRA website.This is similar to this FEIS/ROD for the Atlanta-Charlotte corridor. To date, no funding has been identified for a Tier 2 EIS, 

the next stage in the Project Development process, for either corridor.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Is this a pressing transportation need to Charlotte? Don’t we need rapid rail to Chattanooga, Savannah, Macon, Valdosta first? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a national 

rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Your plan looks like a boom for upstate Carolinas and a bust for more than half of Georgia. Please consider ways to move Georgians more efficiently 

through GEORGIA. Not planning to attend any of your hearings because you have ignored middle, west, east central, and South Georgia with this 

very expensive idea that will benefit our competitor states.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. This is a joint project with South Carolina 

and North Carolina, in the same way way as I-85 is a shared highway and other rail projects between Atlanta and Washington DC are joint projects.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Why not Atlanta to Chattanooga? The Northeast Georgia areas have no buses, no trains, no decent transit route to Atlanta. A Tier 1 Combined Final Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision (Tier 1 FEIS/ROD) was issued for the Atlanta-Chattanooga corridor in August, 

2017, and is available on both GDOT's and the FRA website.This is similar to this FEIS/ROD for the Atlanta-Charlotte corridor. Atlanta-Chattanooga would be 

one step in the process of building high-speed rail to the Midwest. To date, no funding has been identified for a Tier 2 EIS, the next stage in the Project 

Development process, for either corridor. A Tier 1 Combined Final Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision (Tier 1 FEIS/ROD) was issued for 

the Atlanta-Chattanooga corridor in August, 2017, and is available on both GDOT's and the FRA website.This is similar to this FEIS/ROD for the AtlantaCharlotte corridor. To date, no funding has been identified for a Tier 2 EIS, the next stage in the Project Development process, for either corridor.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Rail access has proven itself in not only major USA cities, but all over the world. 1.) Atlanta to Charlotte is good... 2.) Atlanta to ChattanoogaNashville-and Midwest is better. Not only moving persons...but also goods and services from the heartland and renewed industrial areas.A Tier 1 Combined Final Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision (Tier 1 FEIS/ROD) was issued for the Atlanta-Chattanooga corridor in August, 

2017, and is available on both GDOT's and the FRA website.This is similar to this FEIS/ROD for the Atlanta-Charlotte corridor. Atlanta-Chattanooga would be 

one step in the process of building high-speed rail to the Midwest. To date, no funding has been identified for a Tier 2 EIS, the next stage in the Project 

Development process, for either corridor. A Tier 1 Combined Final Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision (Tier 1 FEIS/ROD) was issued for 

the Atlanta-Chattanooga corridor in August, 2017, and is available on both GDOT's and the FRA website.This is similar to this FEIS/ROD for the AtlantaCharlotte corridor. To date, no funding has been identified for a Tier 2 EIS, the next stage in the Project Development process, for either corridor.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Wouldn’t it hold more public interest to go from Atlanta to Savannah instead? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

 The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a 

national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Wouldn't it be more beneficial to have a line to Chattanooga? Allowing stops throughout Cobb and North GA? This doesn't seem like the best 

option/location.

A Tier 1 Combined Final Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision (Tier 1 FEIS/ROD) was issued for the Atlanta-Chattanooga corridor in August, 

2017, and is available on both GDOT's and the FRA website.This is similar to this FEIS/ROD for the Atlanta-Charlotte corridor. To date, no funding has been 

identified for a Tier 2 EIS, the next stage in the Project Development process, for either corridor.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

 While I appreciate a rail line to Athens, it’s seems a bit redundant to have both this line and crescent going to essentially the same destination. I’ve 

ridden the Crescent line before, and think we need rail service that diversifies destinations not essentially goes to similar locations to the crescent 

line. Why not north to Chattanooga/Nashville or south to Florida (without going through Savannah).

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Greenfield high-speed rail project, with fast frequent service offers a different service and user experience from the Southern Crescent service. Cities 

outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a national rail plan and is working with states 

and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-network-development/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast 

Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, 

https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

While I appreciate the idea of a high rail line to Charlotte, I really think we need more help in connecting the parts of Georgia to each other - like ALL 

of the suburbs to Atlanta. Or - create something on a larger scale.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a 

national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. Commuter rail service to 

various parts of the Atlanta area could share tracks with the Atlanta-Charlotte high-speed rail service. A Tier 1 Combined Final Environmental Impact 

Statement and Record of Decision (Tier 1 FEIS/ROD) was issued for the Atlanta-Chattanooga corridor in August, 2017, and is available on both GDOT's and the 

FRA website.This is similar to this FEIS/ROD for the Atlanta-Charlotte corridor. To date, no funding has been identified for a Tier 2 EIS, the next stage in the 

Project Development process, for either corridor.
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I've been talking about this concept for years, but Charlotte is the wrong destination to start with, and the benefit is too small. There are not a lot of 

people that commute from Charlotte to Atlanta or vice versa every day. Definitely not enough to pay for the cost of a rail line. There are more 

people that commute from Chattanooga to Atlanta. The distance to Chattanooga is shorter, lowering the cost to build. Almost all of the distance is 

inside GA borders - which means that the cost to build which is being footed by GA is being spent in GA also. Atlanta has a shortage of water, but 

the Tennessee River is at Chattanooga. Build the rail line, but at the same time, build an aquaduct into it, so that Atlanta gets the water it needs, 

and Chattanooga becomes attractive to large corporations. It's a win for GA and TN. Put one end point near the old train station in Chattanooga. 

Put the other end point at the Amtrack location at Buckhead. Put a mid point station at Cartersville or Adairsville. The benefit to that area is that 

there is a lot of land that is cheaper and empty, and it would spark a lot of home building around there, helping the economy. People living there 

could quickly work in Atlanta, or in Chattanooga, and get to work in minutes. This solution helps Atlanta by getting it much needed water, reduces 

traffic congestion, and gives MARTA more passengers (the people that get off the high speed line and still need to finish their commute into 

Atlanta). It benefits Chattanooga by making it more attractive to business - corporations can locate their offices there and lower their costs for real 

estate. It benefits that workers that choose to live in Chattanooga for quality of life, but need to work in Atlanta can still do so easily. It benefits 

many towns - Cartersville, Adairsville, Rome, Canton. etc. by allowing them to choose to drive to the midpoint and then reach either location 

quickly. Additionally, the local economy should benefit from the additional growth. It benefits TN by giving themand anchor point to which they 

could choose to expand on - running the rail lines up to Nashville and/or Knoxville - and those projects would be under the TN DOT, not funded by 

GA.

A Tier 1 Combined Final Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision (Tier 1 FEIS/ROD) was issued for the Atlanta-Chattanooga corridor in August, 

2017, and is available on both GDOT's and the FRA website.This is similar to this FEIS/ROD for the Atlanta-Charlotte corridor. To date, no funding has been 

identified for a Tier 2 EIS, the next stage in the Project Development process, for either corridor. An aqueduct is not part of the identified Purpose and Need 

for this project.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Need rail to NC and Tennessee!!!!! Charlotte, Nashville, Chattanooga, Knoxville!!!!! Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a 

national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. A Tier 1 Combined Final 

Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision (Tier 1 FEIS/ROD) was issued for the Atlanta-Chattanooga corridor in August, 2017, and is available 

on both GDOT's and the FRA website.This is similar to this FEIS/ROD for the Atlanta-Charlotte corridor. To date, no funding has been identified for a Tier 2 EIS, 

the next stage in the Project Development process, for either corridor.

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I think this is a great plan that should stretch through Macon and on to Savannah Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

 The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a national 

rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

I’d like to see more lines added OTP to ITP. I’d also like to see rail service from the Atlanta Metro to Orlando, Florida. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a national 

rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1.
10/12/2019 Web 

Comment

Why would Gdot go through the Carolinas.Augusta is bustling at the seems with The NSA / Cyber command.We need high speed rail into Fort 

Gordon..The infrastructure can not handle the growth. The Rail is already in place. Straight up I20. Take care of Georgia first- and that includes 

Augusta- we are growing faster than Atlanta

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Atlanta-Charlotte route via Augusta and Columbia was found to be inconsistent with the Project's Purpose and Need and were removed from 

consideration. However, there are oither passenger rail studies in the region. A route from Atlanta to Columbia (via Augusta) could take advantage of the 

Greenfield Alternative, sharing track from Atlanta to Athens. This is a joint project with South Carolina and North Carolina, in the same way way as I-85 is a 

shared highway and other rail projects between Atlanta and Washington DC are joint projects.

Written 

Comment

Please consier inter-city express (e.g. Atlanta to Macon to Savannah), and other metro transit options like TransitX. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a 

national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1.

Written 

Comment

Why not for a GDOT Rail System i.e., MARTA? Then we can built out passenger rail throughout the state. 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

 The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. Intercity and commuter rail service to various parts of 

Georgia could share tracks in the Atlanta area with the Atlanta-Charlotte high-speed rail service.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

A commuter train from Macon to Atlanta will reduce traffic on 75 that has a stop in Henry or Clayton county Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. 

 The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. Intercity and commuter rail service to various parts of 

Georgia could share tracks in the Atlanta area with the Atlanta-Charlotte high-speed rail service.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

HOW WILL YOU GET FUNDING? WOULD YOUR APPROACH BE SIMILAR TO CALIFORNIA? SUGGEST AA LITE RAIL SYSTEM FROM GREENVILLE S C 

TOMYTRLE BEACH AREA HITTING THE LOCAL PORTS AND CRUISE INDUSTRY. COULD BE DONE BY COORDATING WITH RAILROAD AS THIS PROVIDES A 

SHORTER TIME ON INTERMODAL CONTAINERS FOR AUTO INDUSTRY. WHY NOT HWY 86 UTILIZING THE MEDIUM IN OPEN NON CITY AREAS?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a 

national rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. As of this FEIS/ROD, 

additional funding for the Project, both for Tier 2 analysis and for construction, has not been identified or secured. GDOT anticipates that construction funding 

will need to be a shared Federal/state effort, like most public works projects (including public-private partnerships).
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Why Charlotte? There are better ways to put tax dollars to work. There may be better alternatives before long, and with the expense it seems 

unnecessary.

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Would definitely travel using the high-speed transit system for work and personal trips between New York,D.C, Philadelphia, Raleigh, Columbia, 

Jacksonville. When is it slated for going live?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. The remaining steps include completing 

environmental analysis, design, railroad coordination, right-of-way acquisition, construction, operator selection, train acquisition, and commissioning. While 

some of these may overlap, the process will take a number of years.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I support this project but I question whether this will even happen. There needs to be some controls and studies in place but the NEPA process is 

absurd in the level of detail it goes into. This is why it takes this country 20+ years to make a project like this happen and we are so far behind 

Europe. In the meantime, developers build and build, lining the pockets of politicians to the point our infrastructure can’t support the growth. It’s 

embarrassing. 3 questions: What is your plan to actually make this happen in a timely fashion so that I should actually care? How are you going to 

timely secure the necessary Right Of Way for a project of this magnitude? How are you going to fund this, in reality - assuming a P3 project?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. The remaining steps include completing 

environmental analysis, design, railroad coordination, right-of-way acquisition, construction, operator selection, train acquisition, and commissioning. While 

some of these may overlap, the process will take a number of years. States have extensive experience in acquiring right-of-way for highways. GDOT 

anticipates that construction funding will need to be a shared Federal/state effort, like most public works projects (including P3s). 

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

Will they be Express and local trains ? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

As a mother, my concern is adding another gateway into Atlanta and North Ga towns in light of the increased human trafficking. What security 

measures if any will be in place to protect our children and others?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Law enforcement is beyond the scope of 

this study; however, safety and security of passengers is always a top priority for safe public transportation. Human trafficking would be addressed in a service 

safety plan that would be required by federal and state agencies as part of the implementation and commissioning of service on the corridor after the 

completion of Tier 1 and Tier 2 environmental reviews.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

Please provide ongoing information concerning the high speed rail Updates on the Atlanta to Charlotte Tier 1 EIS can be found at the GDOT website at http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoCharlotte or through joining the 

GDOT Atlanta to Charlotte mailing list by emailing AtlantaCharlotteHSR@dot.ga.gov to receive periodic project milestone updates. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

My residence resides along I-85 and would be taken for the I-85 corridor proposal. I would like to stay informed of plans to the extent of 

understanding my courses of action and need to sell my property.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Updates on the Atlanta to Charlotte Tier 1 

EIS can be found at the GDOT website at http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoCharlotte or through joining the GDOT Atlanta to Charlotte mailing list by 

emailing AtlantaCharlotteHSR@dot.ga.gov to receive periodic project milestone updates. 

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Could you please update me on the project? Updates on the Atlanta to Charlotte Tier 1 EIS can be found at the GDOT website at http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoCharlotte or through joining the 

GDOT Atlanta to Charlotte mailing list by emailing AtlantaCharlotteHSR@dot.ga.gov to receive periodic project milestone updates. 

10/20/2019 Web 

Comment

Is it possible for you to broadcast this meeting via the web? I am sure there are many of us who would love to attend one of these meetings but it is 

just not at a time and we can work it into our schedules.

These meetings were not broadcast. Broadcasting public meetings could be considered in the future. Updates on the Atlanta to Charlotte Tier 1 EIS can be 

found at the GDOT website at http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoCharlotte or through joining the GDOT Atlanta to Charlotte mailing list by emailing 

AtlantaCharlotteHSR@dot.ga.gov to receive periodic project milestone updates. 
10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Very interested to hear what COA, GDOT will take under advisement from the citizens of GA. Updates on the Atlanta to Charlotte Tier 1 EIS can be found at the GDOT website at http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoCharlotte or through joining the 

GDOT Atlanta to Charlotte mailing list by emailing AtlantaCharlotteHSR@dot.ga.gov to receive periodic project milestone updates. 

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Will the draft be made available electronically also as a more eco-friendly option? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. All project documents are on the Project 

website http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoCharlotte

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Without public transport options to Atlanta, And only one family car, I am unable to join the meeting seeking input. I would like to Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/17/2019 Web 

Comment

Is the meeting in Charlotte, NC available to local governments? Thank you for your response in advance. Updates on the Atlanta to Charlotte Tier 1 EIS can be found at the GDOT website at http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoCharlotte or through joining the 

GDOT Atlanta to Charlotte mailing list by emailing AtlantaCharlotteHSR@dot.ga.gov to receive periodic project milestone updates. 

10/13/2019 Web 

Comment

What floor will this meeting be held on October 22nd? Updates on the Atlanta to Charlotte Tier 1 EIS can be found at the GDOT website at http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoCharlotte or through joining the 

GDOT Atlanta to Charlotte mailing list by emailing AtlantaCharlotteHSR@dot.ga.gov to receive periodic project milestone updates. 

Written 

Comment Please would you kindly mail me additional information and updates. You can send me them to my email address. 

Updates on the Atlanta to Charlotte Tier 1 EIS can be found at the GDOT website at http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoCharlotte or through joining the 

GDOT Atlanta to Charlotte mailing list by emailing AtlantaCharlotteHSR@dot.ga.gov to receive periodic project milestone updates. 

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I support that GDOT is thinking about interstate high speed rail options. That's great. However my comment is about overall priorities and focus for 

NOW - we have current traffic issues in Atlanta just getting around. We need to focus on MARTA. Specifically we need to prove the concept of 

transit can actually work in Atlanta (otherwise no one will buy into interstate rail). Stop trying to build out MARTA where people don't currently 

want it (ie the burbs) and focus on supporting and funding light rail around the whole Beltline loop where people want it AND will USE it. When the 

burbs see a profitable, well connected transit system that works not just for commuters but for recreational use also, I believe they will buy into it. 

And that will make selling interstate high speed rail a lot easier cos it will be more desirable for business and pleasure as a no-auto transport option. 

The power of transit is in whole journey connectivity not just transit connectivity for a segment of a journey. What's going to happen when they 

arrive in Atl or Charlotte - will they likely need to rent a car (probably)? - in which case they will opt to just take the car for the convenience and 

spend an extra hour on the road.

One of the goals of the Project is to support the development of planned multimodal transportation hubs that complement existing and planned transit 

services. With respect to improving regional transportation systems linkages, providing seamless connections to local transportation systems along the 

corridor is equally important to improving mobility. The Project will improve transportation options along the corridor by integrating with other local and 

regional travel networks, such as Atlanta’s Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) and the Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS), travel nodes 

such as H-JAIA and CLT airports, and multimodal transportation facilities such as the Charlotte Gateway Station. Station locations and transit connections will 

be determined in the Tier 2 EIS environmental review. For more information about transit planning in the Metro Atlanta area, please consult the Atlanta 

Transit Link Authority website: https://atltransit.ga.gov/. 

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

As a resident and part of the workforce in the City of Atlanta, it is fun to see the city gaining so much popularity with people moving here and big 

events coming to town. This rail project will put yet another spotlight on the city and how well it caters to national and global travelers. However, 

with this increased focus and rapidly growing population, local travel in and around the city is only getting worse. GDOT’s plans to expand highways 

around the city in the next two decades is only a bandage on a much larger transportation problem. It is my opinion that if Atlanta wants to 

compete with other cities on a national and global scale, that GDOT should first focus on funding public and mass transportation improvements in 

and around the city to improve interconnectivity within the city. MARTA is a good start, but it’s limitations, and the limitations of the city to keep 

pace with a city like New York will become evident very quickly if it is not made a priority. Mass and public transportation is the way of the future 

and Atlanta’s ability to grow and compete with other cities will be largely determined by the success of its local public transportation network. As 

we have seen recently, it is in desperate need of upgrade and expansion and these changes cannot come soon enough.

One of the goals of the Project is to support the development of planned multimodal transportation hubs that complement existing and planned transit 

services. With respect to improving regional transportation systems linkages, providing seamless connections to local transportation systems along the 

corridor is equally important to improving mobility. The Project will improve transportation options along the corridor by integrating with other local and 

regional travel networks, such as Atlanta’s Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) and the Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS), travel nodes 

such as H-JAIA and CLT airports, and multimodal transportation facilities such as the Charlotte Gateway Station. Station locations and transit connections will 

be determined in the Tier 2 EIS environmental review. For more information about transit planning in the Metro Atlanta area, please consult the Atlanta 

Transit Link Authority website: https://atltransit.ga.gov/. 
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

What is the impact on the workforce? Even with more people living in GVL and commuting to Atlanta or Charlotte (which could better employment 

for some) there may still be some who commute to GVL and could be taking up jobs here. What are the projections for unemployment to decrease 

here for those of low income (increasing economic mobility- we are one of the lowest in the country)? Without more opportunities given to work 

than taken from outsiders for this group it could further worsen this detrimental problem.

The Project's Purpose and Need Statement identifies supporting an expanding economy as one of the needs of this Project. Providing an alternative to the 

auto and air networks will help to alleviate congestion for a more reliable transportion network that can support economic growth. More and better 

transportation options would be expected to make and better employment opportunities available to all. Specific emploment impacts have not been studied 

as part of this Tier 1 study. Future studies may consider conducting such an analysis. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

COBB COUNTY HAS ISSUES REGARDING SUPPORTING AND FUNDING EXPANDING A LIGHT RAIL TRAIN SYSTEM, BUS ROUTES!!! WHY??? IN MY OPINION FROM VARIOUS SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER & OTHER 

STUDIES THAT THE LACK OF TRANSPORTATION IS DUE TO A RACIAL, SOCIOECONOMICAL EQUITY PLAN THAT HINDERS YOUTH FROM OBTAINING EDUCATIONAL, WORKFORCE & ECONOMICAL TRAINING,. PROGRESS 

ESPECIALLY FOR TRANSPORTATION... THE DISABLED TO GAIN ACESS TO INDEPENDENCE & SENIOR CITIZENS TO HEALTH CARE, ACTIVITIES & ENRICHMENT!!! I AND NUMEROUS COBB COUNTY RESIDENTS & 

COMMUNITY LEADERS ARE OF THE OPINIONS THAT TIM LEE AND HIS GOOD OLE BOYS BUSINESSES BUILD THE SUNTRUST STADIUM & AREA SURROUNDING IT... WITH BACK ROOM DEAL$, UNDER THE TABLE 

KICKBACK$, ETC!!! AND WITH NO VOTE OF CONFIDENCE & REGARDS FOR ITS CITIZENS!!! WHY??? 1.LACK OF TRANSPORTATION MEANS: THE LIVEABILITY INITIATIVE 2020 PLAN IS NULL TO INCREASE THE HAVE VS 

THE HAVE NOTS!!! INCREASE TAXES, EXTEND THE COUNTY BUDGET BEYOND ITS MEANS & PASS IT ON TO THE TAXPAYERS, COBB COUNTY COMMISSIONERS & CHAIR!!! 2.LACK OF TRANSPORTATION MEANS: THE OUT 

OF SIGHT, OUT OF MIND PLAN FAMILIES MARGINALIZED THEREFORE ARE LOSING THEIR QUALITY OF LIFE, THEIR HOMES TO COMMERCIAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, EMINENT DOMAIN PLANS, MOM & POP 

BUSINESSES ARE CLOSING, ENTREPRENEURSHIP BY BLACK & BROWN RESIDENTS DECLINES!!! BIG BUSINESSES CLOSING IN WITH UNLIVABLE WAGES!!! INDUSTRY GIANTS LIKE AMAZON, STARBUCKS, ETC HIRING 

MORE IMMIGRANTS & OUT OF TOWNERS THAN HIRING OUR YOUTH, DISPLACED ADULT WORKERS!!! IN ADDITION THEY CAN ONLY FIND JOBS IN INDUSTRIAL PARKS WHICH ARE USUALLY LOCATED ON THE OUTSKIRT 

CORRIDORS OF THE COUNTY. WHICH ARE EVEN HARDER TO REACH WITH OUT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION!!! WHY??? 3.LACK OF COBB COUNTY TRANSPORTATION MEANS: DIVIDE AND CONQUER PLAN WHICH 

MEANS A MORE WHITE AFFLUENT & RETIRED COMMUNITY VS A MULTI CULTURAL BLACK & BROWN COMMMUNITY!!! WHO GETS PRICED OUT OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING, WORKFORCE 

TRAINING, JOB OPPORTUNITIES AND QUALITY OF LIFE IS STIFILED, GENTRIFIED BY MILLENNIALS, REDLINED REAL ESTATES & FURTHER MARGINALIZED BY SOCIALLY ENGINEERING POVERTY & POLARIZING THE 

WORKING POOR FAMILIES!!! WHY??? 4. LACK OF A BUDGET TRANSPORTATION MEANS: THE FLEX SHUFFLE BUSES HAVE A LITTLE BUDGET $$$ PLAN SETUP FIR FAILURE! AND NOW THE COBB COUNTY CITIZENS ARE 

PAYING FOR IT!!! RATHER THAN PAY FOR INCREASING ROUTES, ZONES & RIDERSHIP ON THE PRESENT BUS SHUTTLES...WHICH WAS A PILOT TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM SET UP TO FAIL...BY LIMITING ACCESS TO 

BUSE ROUTES AND ZONING AREAS IN LOW INCOME AREAS THAT NEED THE SHUTTLE BUS BUT CAN'T AFFORD IT!!! WE NEED SUBSIDIES FOR BUS PASSES FIR STUDENTS, SENIORS AND DISABLED! IN CONCLUSION I AND 

OTHER COMMUNITY LEADERS, ADVOCATES & CITIZENS HAVE ATTEND MEETINGS AT THE COBB COUNTY TRANSPORTATION BOARD. WE WERE TOLD OVER & OVER AGAIN THERE IS NO FUNDING AVAILABLE TO 

EXPAND BUS ROUTES, INCREASE RIDERSHIP, MARKETING, ADVERTISING THE PRESENT BUS SHUTTLES OR DEVELOP LIGHT RAIL COMMUTER TRANSPORTATION!!! WHY??? BECAUSE COBB COUNTY DON'T CARE ABOUT 

ITS POOR OF WORKING POOR!!! THAN WHY ARE THERE RAILROAD TRACKS THROUGHOUT COBB COUNTY NOT BEING UTILIZED FOR PUBLIC PASSENGERS TRANSPORTATION??? AND ANY WHERE YOU LIVE IN COBB 

COUNTY YOU CAN HERE A TRAIN HORN BLOWING TRANSPORTING CARGO FROM AND TO SAVANNAH GA SHIPPING PORTS, BUT NO PASSINGER RAILROAD SYSTEM THAT WILL RUNS DAY AND NIGHT IN AND THROUGH 

COBB COUNTY FOR ITS RESIDENTS!!! WHY??? APPARENTLY THE SMALL MINDED GOOD OLE BOYS, SMALL TOWN MAYBERRY MENTALITY & SMALL PROGRESSIVESELECTED OFFICIALS SEEM TO THINK THAT IF THEY 

KEEP COBB COUNTY TRANSPORTATION FROM EXPANDING, THEY WILL KEEP COBB COUNTY TO MAINTAIN THAT SMALL TOWN FEELING!!! BUT THE REAL REASON IS MORE POLITICALLY & RACIAL MOTIVATED!!! AND 

THAT IS THEY BELIEVE THEY WILL STOP THE UNDESIRABLES AT BAY... LOLLLL BUT THE UNDESIRABLES HAVE CARS TOO!!! WHICH IS WHY THE COBB COUNTY RED RIGHT WINGED CONSERVATIVES, GOP, REPUBLICAN 

PARTY REGIME & RACIAL BASIED AGENDA IS SO AFRAID OF WHATS HAPPENING AND GOING TO TURN COBB COUNTY BLUE BY 2020!!! Possible ways of lessening cars on the road is by biking and walking. Do you 

consider your city to be bike and walk friendly? How might that be improved upon? Is this a priority for you? Yes but we must have the leadership and political will to make Powder Springs a bike and walk friendly 

town. First there are not enough sidewalks, non existent bike lane markers or bike storage racks and not encourage by the City Council or Mayor! Has your city taken any steps to become electric vehicle friendly? 

NO NOT THERE YET!!! How does your city encourage recycling? The City of Powder Springs has several recycling containers throughout the town. In my opinion needs to do more comprehensive Green Plan that 

includes mandated recycling bins, resident waste recycling containers and a recycling drop off center for citizens to use. Does your city offer any incentives for smart growth, e.g. redevelopment of existing buildings 

rather than clear cutting and starting over, transit-oriented development, mixed use development? No! Because the Mayor, City Council and Community Development department of Powder Springs lacks the political 

will and back bone to take a stand against the Long time “Residental Silver head Towners and diehard Mayberryites”! Who don’t want Progressive Changes, Modern Social Resposibile Programs, Commercial Green 

Plan Redevelopment for Cityhood, and Racial Reconciliatory Projects, Social Economical justice industries. In other words they serve at the pleasure of the elite and seniors who keep voting for them and keeping them 

in office to do their biddings!

One of the goals of the Project is to support the development of planned multimodal transportation hubs that complement existing and planned transit 

services. With respect to improving regional transportation systems linkages, providing seamless connections to local transportation systems along the 

corridor is equally important to improving mobility. The Project will improve transportation options along the corridor by integrating with other local and 

regional travel networks, such as Atlanta’s Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) and the Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS), travel nodes 

such as H-JAIA and CLT airports, and multimodal transportation facilities such as the Charlotte Gateway Station. Station locations and transit connections will 

be determined in the Tier 2 EIS environmental review. For more information about transit planning in the Metro Atlanta area, please consult the Atlanta 

Transit Link Authority website: https://atltransit.ga.gov/. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I don't know where this fits. Given how things are, we could use some shuttles or buses to the train. Also, buses between cities. Could be a matter 

of local transit beefing up...?

One of the goals of the Project is to support the development of planned multimodal transportation hubs that complement existing and planned transit 

services. With respect to improving regional transportation systems linkages, providing seamless connections to local transportation systems along the 

corridor is equally important to improving mobility. The Project will improve transportation options along the corridor by integrating with other local and 

regional travel networks, such as Atlanta’s Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) and the Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS), travel nodes 

such as H-JAIA and CLT airports, and multimodal transportation facilities such as the Charlotte Gateway Station. Station locations and transit connections will 

be determined in the Tier 2 EIS environmental review. For more information about transit planning in the Metro Atlanta area, please consult the Atlanta 

Transit Link Authority website: https://atltransit.ga.gov/. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Why is rail even being proposed? It is an outmoded form of transportation that is expensive to build, expensive to maintain and underutilized. It is 

the perfect 19th century solution to a 21st century problem. Bus rapid transit is much more cost-effective and the lanes built for buses can also by 

used by autonomous vehicles. By the time a rail line is built, autonomous microtransit will be fully implemented and the technology will allow transit 

to be much more efficient and convenient.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. Bus Rapid Transit does not meet the 

Project's defined Purpose and Need .

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Regarding ATL-Charlotte train, why not put your efforts to solving the greater Metro Atlanta area traffic issues, which the Express Lanes did not 

solve.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 

of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the Greenville/Spartanburg area. Commuter rail service within the 

Atlanta region would be able to share the high-speed rail tracks.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

Like to know the benefits of Tucker receiving this, other than a train ride. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.
10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

I reviewed all the PIOH materials and have the following questions & comments. 1) The purpose and need is very general. Hasn't there been work 

conducted as part of the Statewide Transportation Plan or even by ARC Region's Plan to specifically identify the problems/needs of intercity travel? 

What are they and how is this particular project expected to meet those needs? I agree that rail is a very important mode, and more options are 

essential, however without a bit more specifics it's hard to support such a huge investment. My extended family lives in Raleigh, NC area so we 

travel this corridor often, and I would LOVE to use a high speed train instead of personal vehicle. However, to really support it we need better 

evidence for decision makers to invest. 2) Are all the impacts negative? Diverting car trips would be a positive impact right - so the blue symbol is 

best? However, impacts to minority and lower income groups are assumed to be negative impacts right? - so the green symbol is best for that row? 

It's hard to compare alternatives without at least a little more detail or clarification, or at least presentation of the impacts in a comparable way.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. he Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of 

the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the Greenville/Spartanburg area. Please read relevant chapters of 

the FEIS/ROD for more details than contained in the PIOH material.

10/31/2019 Web 

Comment

The train would be great. But as someone who has lived in Amtrak’s northeastern corridor and used it frequently, the problems here are a) will we 

actually have service on the new line if it’s built? Currently we can go to Charlotte like 1x/day on Amtrak - that’s pretty useless for practical 

purposes. b) taking the train to Charlotte is way worse if you have to get a car when you get there.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

A Service Development Plan (SDP) was not developed for this Tier 1 EIS, but will be developed during a future Tier 2 environmental review, and will outline 

how the proposed high-speed rail service will be operated, dispatched and maintained, and will include potential train schedules.

10/30/2019 Web 

Comment

What is the cost per passenger (10 years of ridership)? How many trains per day? Will it connect to Washington DC, NYC, and Boston? Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

 The Atlanta-Charlotte corridor has been identified as having very high ridership potential. It is anticipated that train operations will be profitable, as is typical 

of high-speed rail in populous corridors. Hourly or better service is anticipated. Connections to the Southeast and Northeast Corridor beyond Charlotte have 

not yet been determined. A Service Development Plan (SDP) was not developed for this Tier 1 EIS, but will be developed during a future Tier 2 environmental 

review, and will outline how the proposed high-speed rail service will be operated, dispatched and maintained. 

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Matters less which corridor is selected and more that funding for a day train to connect Metro Atlanta to the Northeast is found. Start service and 

let the corridor improvements flow from that.

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

This Project is an extension of the Southeast High-Speed Rail Corridor that will ultimately connect to the Northeast Corridor at Union Station in Washington, 

D.C .This Project is planning fast, frequent service. Adding a single train at the current speeds would not meet the Project's defined Purpose and Need. A 

Service Development Plan (SDP) was not developed for this Tier 1 EIS, but will be developed during a future Tier 2 environmental review, and will outline how 

the proposed high-speed rail service will be operated, dispatched and maintained. 
10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

I travel weekly on business,national and international Potential connection to Atlanta should be supported (and not just to Atlanta) What about 

DC and NY and Chicago? Air travel is a customer and environmental mess Ridiculous USA dies not lead the world in this area

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

 The Purpose of this Project (in Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROS) is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte via the 

Greenville/Spartanburg area. Cities outside of this Corridor are beyond the scope of this Project. The Federal Railroad Administration has developed a national 

rail plan and is working with states and other stakeholders on a series of regional rail plans https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-networkdevelopment/planning/national-rail-plan. The Southeast Corridor Commission adopted the Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study, the final report is posted 

on the Southeast Corridor Commision's webiste, https://www.southeastcorridor-commission.org/copy-of-commission-reports-1. The Southeast Rail Corridor 

covers the corridor between Atlanta-Greenville/Spartanburg-Charlotte-Raleigh-Richmond and Washington DC, where it connects with the the Northeast 

Corridor. Each state also has its own rail plan which is available on the state DOT website. States have also led feasibity studies, and in some cases, 

environmental analyses of specific corridors.

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

It would be helpful to study the potential impact of the new route to encourage tax payer approval. Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

I think the corridor is a bad idea. What's the purpose? Who will use this? There's nothing in Atlanta I want to use or see and the same goes for 

Charlotte. Put this thing through here and this Beautiful City turns to crap!

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail 

with frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into Charlotte, 

as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. Detailed 

frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified for a Tier 2 study.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Why can you not use existing rail lines? Why do you need to use a greenfield? Why do we need this new rail system? Who do you expect to use it? 

Who have you surveyed for the need for this rail system?

Prior to establishing the Project’s Need and Purpose, a scoping phase was conducted with stakeholders and agencies to discuss goals and objectives that 

ultimately determined a need for the Project. Once this step in the Tier 1 EIS process was complete, the Project’s purpose was established, which is to 

improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region’s transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and 

reliability through high-speed passenger rail services. The Project will provide transportation system capacity necessary to accommodate current and 

projected population and economic growth occurring along the SEHSR Corridor network including the following metropolitan areas in the Piedmont Atlantic 

Megaregion: Atlanta, Charlotte, Greenville, and Spartanburg. It is not possible to provide infinite highway and airport capacity. GDOT has identified eight 

transportation system needs relevant to the Study Area, each corresponding to the anticipated population and employment growth with increasing travel 

demand. The Project will satisfy the following needs: population and employment growth; improve regional transportation system connectivity; increase 

transportation system capacity; improve travel times and reliability; provide an alternative travel mode; traveler safety; improve energy efficiency and air 

quality; and maintain and enhance economic growth and vitality. 

The Project Purpose and Need can be referenced in Section 1.4 of the Tier I FEIS/ROD. For ridership, please see Chapter 2 of the FEIS/ROD, specifically Section 

2.2.2.5 (Ridership and Revenue) and also Appendix B (Alternatives Development Report), specifically Section 5.6.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

The study states a need for this project. Please show the research used to determine this need. Prior to establishing the Project’s Need and Purpose, a scoping phase was conducted with stakeholders and agencies to discuss goals and objectives that 

ultimately determined a need for the Project. Once this step in the Tier 1 EIS process was complete, the Project’s purpose was established, which is to 

improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region’s transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and 

reliability through high-speed passenger rail services. The Project will provide transportation system capacity necessary to accommodate current and 

projected population and economic growth occurring along the SEHSR Corridor network including the following metropolitan areas in the Piedmont Atlantic 

Megaregion: Atlanta, Charlotte, Greenville, and Spartanburg. It is not possible to provide infinite highway and airport capacity. GDOT has identified eight 

transportation system needs relevant to the Study Area, each corresponding to the anticipated population and employment growth with increasing travel 

demand. The Project will satisfy the following needs: population and employment growth; improve regional transportation system connectivity; increase 

transportation system capacity; improve travel times and reliability; provide an alternative travel mode; traveler safety; improve energy efficiency and air 

quality; and maintain and enhance economic growth and vitality. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

What is the pressing need for this connection? Georgia cannot seem to accommodate the transportation needs of its citizens in the most densely 

populated cities in North Georgia.

Prior to establishing the Project’s Need and Purpose, a scoping phase was conducted with stakeholders and agencies to discuss goals and objectives that 

ultimately determined a need for the Project. Once this step in the Tier 1 EIS process was complete, the Project’s purpose was established, which is to 

improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region’s transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and 

reliability through high-speed passenger rail services. The Project will provide transportation system capacity necessary to accommodate current and 

projected population and economic growth occurring along the SEHSR Corridor network including the following metropolitan areas in the Piedmont Atlantic 

Megaregion: Atlanta, Charlotte, Greenville, and Spartanburg. It is not possible to provide infinite highway and airport capacity. GDOT has identified eight 

transportation system needs relevant to the Study Area, each corresponding to the anticipated population and employment growth with increasing travel 

demand. The Project will satisfy the following needs: population and employment growth; improve regional transportation system connectivity; increase 

transportation system capacity; improve travel times and reliability; provide an alternative travel mode; traveler safety; improve energy efficiency and air 

quality; and maintain and enhance economic growth and vitality. 
10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I'm not sure I see the value of having high speed rail between Atlanta and Charlotte. Are there really that many people traveling between the two 

cities to warrant this kind of project? What about the millions of us who sit in traffic in Atlanta each day? That should be our primary concern. We 

already have transportation to Charlotte available via HJAIA.

Prior to establishing the Project’s Need and Purpose, a scoping phase was conducted with stakeholders and agencies to discuss goals and objectives that 

ultimately determined a need for the Project. Once this step in the Tier 1 EIS process was complete, the Project’s purpose was established, which is to 

improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region’s transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and 

reliability through high-speed passenger rail services. The Project will provide transportation system capacity necessary to accommodate current and 

projected population and economic growth occurring along the SEHSR Corridor network including the following metropolitan areas in the Piedmont Atlantic 

Megaregion: Atlanta, Charlotte, Greenville, and Spartanburg. It is not possible to provide infinite highway and airport capacity. GDOT has identified eight 

transportation system needs relevant to the Study Area, each corresponding to the anticipated population and employment growth with increasing travel 

demand. The Project will satisfy the following needs: population and employment growth; improve regional transportation system connectivity; increase 

transportation system capacity; improve travel times and reliability; provide an alternative travel mode; traveler safety; improve energy efficiency and air 

quality; and maintain and enhance economic growth and vitality. 

10/21/2019 Web 

Comment

What will it bring to the city ? A lot in every sector Prior to establishing the Project’s Need and Purpose, a scoping phase was conducted with stakeholders and agencies to discuss goals and objectives that 

ultimately determined a need for the Project. Once this step in the Tier 1 EIS process was complete, the Project’s purpose was established, which is to 

improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region’s transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and 

reliability through high-speed passenger rail services. The Project will provide transportation system capacity necessary to accommodate current and 

projected population and economic growth occurring along the SEHSR Corridor network including the following metropolitan areas in the Piedmont Atlantic 

Megaregion: Atlanta, Charlotte, Greenville, and Spartanburg. It is not possible to provide infinite highway and airport capacity. GDOT has identified eight 

transportation system needs relevant to the Study Area, each corresponding to the anticipated population and employment growth with increasing travel 

demand. The Project will satisfy the following needs: population and employment growth; improve regional transportation system connectivity; increase 

transportation system capacity; improve travel times and reliability; provide an alternative travel mode; traveler safety; improve energy efficiency and air 

quality; and maintain and enhance economic growth and vitality. 

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

Please tell me why this is needed. The southern Crescent has been available for decades and ridership continues to fall. Even with hefty 

government subsidies, the cost of a ticket is not competitive with alternative methods of transportation. Why would this be any different?

Prior to establishing the Project’s Need and Purpose, a scoping phase was conducted with stakeholders and agencies to discuss goals and objectives that 

ultimately determined a need for the Project. Once this step in the Tier 1 EIS process was complete, the Project’s purpose was established, which is to 

improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region’s transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and 

reliability through high-speed passenger rail services. The Project will provide transportation system capacity necessary to accommodate current and 

projected population and economic growth occurring along the SEHSR Corridor network including the following metropolitan areas in the Piedmont Atlantic 

Megaregion: Atlanta, Charlotte, Greenville, and Spartanburg. It is not possible to provide infinite highway and airport capacity. GDOT has identified eight 

transportation system needs relevant to the Study Area, each corresponding to the anticipated population and employment growth with increasing travel 

demand. The Project will satisfy the following needs: population and employment growth; improve regional transportation system connectivity; increase 

transportation system capacity; improve travel times and reliability; provide an alternative travel mode; traveler safety; improve energy efficiency and air 

quality; and maintain and enhance economic growth and vitality. 

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

There is already rail service between Charlotte and Atlanta. Why is the money being spent? Could it not be put to better use somewhere else? Prior to establishing the Project’s Need and Purpose, a scoping phase was conducted with stakeholders and agencies to discuss goals and objectives that 

ultimately determined a need for the Project. Once this step in the Tier 1 EIS process was complete, the Project’s purpose was established, which is to 

improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region’s transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and 

reliability through high-speed passenger rail services. The Project will provide transportation system capacity necessary to accommodate current and 

projected population and economic growth occurring along the SEHSR Corridor network including the following metropolitan areas in the Piedmont Atlantic 

Megaregion: Atlanta, Charlotte, Greenville, and Spartanburg. It is not possible to provide infinite highway and airport capacity. GDOT has identified eight 

transportation system needs relevant to the Study Area, each corresponding to the anticipated population and employment growth with increasing travel 

demand. The Project will satisfy the following needs: population and employment growth; improve regional transportation system connectivity; increase 

transportation system capacity; improve travel times and reliability; provide an alternative travel mode; traveler safety; improve energy efficiency and air 

quality; and maintain and enhance economic growth and vitality. 

10/18/2019 Web 

Comment

My concern is that a lot of money will be spent to construct this and then the ridership will be lower than expected. Then some form of subsidies 

will be needed to keep it fiscally viable. Then the burden falls upon those that don't use it to pay for it. This will be challenged in court.

Prior to establishing the Project’s Need and Purpose, a scoping phase was conducted with stakeholders and agencies to discuss goals and objectives that 

ultimately determined a need for the Project. Once this step in the Tier 1 EIS process was complete, the Project’s purpose was established, which is to 

improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region’s transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and 

reliability through high-speed passenger rail services. The Project will provide transportation system capacity necessary to accommodate current and 

projected population and economic growth occurring along the SEHSR Corridor network including the following metropolitan areas in the Piedmont Atlantic 

Megaregion: Atlanta, Charlotte, Greenville, and Spartanburg. It is not possible to provide infinite highway and airport capacity. GDOT has identified eight 

transportation system needs relevant to the Study Area, each corresponding to the anticipated population and employment growth with increasing travel 

demand. The Project will satisfy the following needs: population and employment growth; improve regional transportation system connectivity; increase 

transportation system capacity; improve travel times and reliability; provide an alternative travel mode; traveler safety; improve energy efficiency and air 

quality; and maintain and enhance economic growth and vitality. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Why are we building a light rail to Charlotte when we can’t build one to Northwest Atlanta metro in Cobb. This is literally a waste of money. Prior to establishing the Project’s Need and Purpose, a scoping phase was conducted with stakeholders and agencies to discuss goals and objectives that 

ultimately determined a need for the Project. Once this step in the Tier 1 EIS process was complete, the Project’s purpose was established, which is to 

improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region’s transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and 

reliability through high-speed passenger rail services. The Project will provide transportation system capacity necessary to accommodate current and 

projected population and economic growth occurring along the SEHSR Corridor network including the following metropolitan areas in the Piedmont Atlantic 

Megaregion: Atlanta, Charlotte, Greenville, and Spartanburg. It is not possible to provide infinite highway and airport capacity. GDOT has identified eight 

transportation system needs relevant to the Study Area, each corresponding to the anticipated population and employment growth with increasing travel 

demand. The Project will satisfy the following needs: population and employment growth; improve regional transportation system connectivity; increase 

transportation system capacity; improve travel times and reliability; provide an alternative travel mode; traveler safety; improve energy efficiency and air 

quality; and maintain and enhance economic growth and vitality. 
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Boondoggle; why not build a high speed rail line, for instance, from Chattanooga, TN to Jacksonville, FL that would traverse our state and serve more 

Georgia citizens and taxpayers. How many citizens travel to Charlotte?

Prior to establishing the Project’s Need and Purpose, a scoping phase was conducted with stakeholders and agencies to discuss goals and objectives that 

ultimately determined a need for the Project. Once this step in the Tier 1 EIS process was complete, the Project’s purpose was established, which is to 

improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region’s transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and 

reliability through high-speed passenger rail services. The Project will provide transportation system capacity necessary to accommodate current and 

projected population and economic growth occurring along the SEHSR Corridor network including the following metropolitan areas in the Piedmont Atlantic 

Megaregion: Atlanta, Charlotte, Greenville, and Spartanburg. It is not possible to provide infinite highway and airport capacity. GDOT has identified eight 

transportation system needs relevant to the Study Area, each corresponding to the anticipated population and employment growth with increasing travel 

demand. The Project will satisfy the following needs: population and employment growth; improve regional transportation system connectivity; increase 

transportation system capacity; improve travel times and reliability; provide an alternative travel mode; traveler safety; improve energy efficiency and air 

quality; and maintain and enhance economic growth and vitality. This is a joint project with SCDOT and NCDOT, in the same way as I-85 is a joint effort.

11/3/2019 Web 

Comment

I live along this corridor and in perfect world this may be a good idea. However, where in the US has High Speed Rail been completed anywhere 

close to the budget? Where in the US has HSR been successful? Why do you think it will be successful in this corridor? Just another waste of tax 

money and a way for the politicians to spend their "pork" from state and federal budgets.

High-speed rail is now operating in 20 countries with widely varying geographies and demographics. Several U.S. projects are in construction or final design.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

This is a ridiculous project, a boondogle. Number one, it is too expensive. Number two, ridership will be minimal. Please scrap the project. You 

have already spent too much money studying this.

Prior to establishing the Project’s Need and Purpose, a scoping phase was conducted with stakeholders and agencies to discuss goals and objectives that 

ultimately determined a need for the Project. Once this step in the Tier 1 EIS process was complete, the Project’s purpose was established, which is to 

improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region’s transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and 

reliability through high-speed passenger rail services. The Project will provide transportation system capacity necessary to accommodate current and 

projected population and economic growth occurring along the SEHSR Corridor network including the following metropolitan areas in the Piedmont Atlantic 

Megaregion: Atlanta, Charlotte, Greenville, and Spartanburg. It is not possible to provide infinite highway and airport capacity. GDOT has identified eight 

transportation system needs relevant to the Study Area, each corresponding to the anticipated population and employment growth with increasing travel 

demand. The Project will satisfy the following needs: population and employment growth; improve regional transportation system connectivity; increase 

transportation system capacity; improve travel times and reliability; provide an alternative travel mode; traveler safety; improve energy efficiency and air 

quality; and maintain and enhance economic growth and vitality. 

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

EVERY dollar stolen from taxpayers and used to fund "Public" or "Mass" transit including high-speed rail, is money flushed down the toilet. It's an 

abuse of the taxpayer and the money they provide. FIX THE HIGHWAYS. ELIMINATE TOLL ROADS. STOP WASTING MONEY ON TRAFFIC CALMING 

AND BIKE LANES. PRIORITIZE MOTOR VEHICLE TRAFFIC, because motor vehicle owners/operators are the ONLY people paying EXTRA to fund 

roadway infrastructure (via the motor vehicle fuel tax.)

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. The motor fuel tax now only pays about 

60% of expenses associated with roadways. The balance comes from general revenues.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

Greenfield route doesn't have the road names on the map. Is there a more detailed schematic or listing of route? Please see Appendix A, Parts 6 and 7 of the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD map books. GDOT can provide GIS or KMZ files upon request. The precise route of the rail line will 

be determined during the Tier 2 analysis.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

The ATL-Charlotte rail is fine as long as the counties it goes through pay for it, as the rail has no impact on my commute. Prior to establishing the Project’s Need and Purpose, a scoping phase was conducted with stakeholders and agencies to discuss goals and objectives that 

ultimately determined a need for the Project. Once this step in the Tier 1 EIS process was complete, the Project’s purpose was established, which is to 

improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region’s transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and 

reliability through high-speed passenger rail services. The Project will provide transportation system capacity necessary to accommodate current and 

projected population and economic growth occurring along the SEHSR Corridor network including the following metropolitan areas in the Piedmont Atlantic 

Megaregion: Atlanta, Charlotte, Greenville, and Spartanburg. It is not possible to provide infinite highway and airport capacity. GDOT has identified eight 

transportation system needs relevant to the Study Area, each corresponding to the anticipated population and employment growth with increasing travel 

demand. The Project will satisfy the following needs: population and employment growth; improve regional transportation system connectivity; increase 

transportation system capacity; improve travel times and reliability; provide an alternative travel mode; traveler safety; improve energy efficiency and air 

quality; and maintain and enhance economic growth and vitality. Funding for construction has not yet been identified but, like most public works projects, 

some combination of state and Federal funding will probably be required. Atlanta-Charlotte has been identified as a major corridor and it is antipated that 

operations will be profitable, as is typical of high-speed rail in populous corridors.

10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Once again the taxpayer is on the hook for a new, massive project. How about letting taxpayers op-in for this project rather than being forced to 

just accept something of this magnitude as status quo. My prediction: it will be less expensive to drive individually, subscribe to a ride-share service, 

or autonomous driver vehicles. The ATL Streetcar is a perfect example of how government continues to waste taxpayer dollars.

Prior to establishing the Project’s Need and Purpose, a scoping phase was conducted with stakeholders and agencies to discuss goals and objectives that 

ultimately determined a need for the Project. Once this step in the Tier 1 EIS process was complete, the Project’s purpose was established, which is to 

improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region’s transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and 

reliability through high-speed passenger rail services. The Project will provide transportation system capacity necessary to accommodate current and 

projected population and economic growth occurring along the SEHSR Corridor network including the following metropolitan areas in the Piedmont Atlantic 

Megaregion: Atlanta, Charlotte, Greenville, and Spartanburg. It is not possible to provide infinite highway and airport capacity. GDOT has identified eight 

transportation system needs relevant to the Study Area, each corresponding to the anticipated population and employment growth with increasing travel 

demand. The Project will satisfy the following needs: population and employment growth; improve regional transportation system connectivity; increase 

transportation system capacity; improve travel times and reliability; provide an alternative travel mode; traveler safety; improve energy efficiency and air 

quality; and maintain and enhance economic growth and vitality. 
10/24/2019 Web 

Comment

Connecting communities and resources will never be a bad idea but how long and at what cost to the sanity of our region will this build impact us. 

Careful consideration of the already ongoing upheaval in traffic should be a significant consideration.

Prior to establishing the Project’s Need and Purpose, a scoping phase was conducted with stakeholders and agencies to discuss goals and objectives that 

ultimately determined a need for the Project. Once this step in the Tier 1 EIS process was complete, the Project’s purpose was established, which is to 

improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region’s transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and 

reliability through high-speed passenger rail services. The Project will provide transportation system capacity necessary to accommodate current and 

projected population and economic growth occurring along the SEHSR Corridor network including the following metropolitan areas in the Piedmont Atlantic 

Megaregion: Atlanta, Charlotte, Greenville, and Spartanburg. It is not possible to provide infinite highway and airport capacity. GDOT has identified eight 

transportation system needs relevant to the Study Area, each corresponding to the anticipated population and employment growth with increasing travel 

demand. The Project will satisfy the following needs: population and employment growth; improve regional transportation system connectivity; increase 

transportation system capacity; improve travel times and reliability; provide an alternative travel mode; traveler safety; improve energy efficiency and air 

quality; and maintain and enhance economic growth and vitality. Funding for construction has not yet been identified but, like most public works projects, 

some combination of state and Federal funding will probably be required. Atlanta-Charlotte has been identified as a major corridor and it is antipated that 

operations will be profitable, as is typical of high-speed rail in populous corridors.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

This project is like so many with well documented data to support the focus or same. In general the idea of improving transportation is good BUT —- 

I don’t understand why we focus on moving people vs goods as my person observation is the highway system is clogged with trucks not cars. If 

eliminating cars is the goal then how is this going to work in terms of cost? There is tons of data on speed and reduction of cars but not how it will 

work on a P&L basis. Will this be another well intended idea that can’t support itself. I wish it would but the facts on most of these systems is they 

don’t work where the tire meets the road. The simple costs of a large Govt Dept to manage it alone suggests the P&L will end be another Post 

Office. Sorry but if allowed to vote I will be against it unless a new approach to building and running is put forth. Thanks for listening!

Prior to establishing the Project’s Need and Purpose, a scoping phase was conducted with stakeholders and agencies to discuss goals and objectives that 

ultimately determined a need for the Project. Once this step in the Tier 1 EIS process was complete, the Project’s purpose was established, which is to 

improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region’s transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and 

reliability through high-speed passenger rail services. The Project will provide transportation system capacity necessary to accommodate current and 

projected population and economic growth occurring along the SEHSR Corridor network including the following metropolitan areas in the Piedmont Atlantic 

Megaregion: Atlanta, Charlotte, Greenville, and Spartanburg. It is not possible to provide infinite highway and airport capacity. GDOT has identified eight 

transportation system needs relevant to the Study Area, each corresponding to the anticipated population and employment growth with increasing travel 

demand. The Project will satisfy the following needs: population and employment growth; improve regional transportation system connectivity; increase 

transportation system capacity; improve travel times and reliability; provide an alternative travel mode; traveler safety; improve energy efficiency and air 

quality; and maintain and enhance economic growth and vitality. Funding for construction has not yet been identified but, like most public works projects, 

some combination of state and Federal funding will probably be required. Atlanta-Charlotte has been identified as a major corridor and it is antipated that 

operations will be profitable, as is typical of high-speed rail in populous corridors.

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

A high speed rail system between ATL and CLT would be awesome, assuming tickets are reasonably priced. We frequently travel to both cities and if 

we could cut the travel times in half, we would definitely consider going by rail. But with a family of 5, we'd have to weigh the cost of rail to 

gas/time and getting around without a vehicle on the other end if not traveling to airports. If you could add a field in the survey to accept email 

addresses for you to send information to friends and family about the project, it would be beneficial to all.

Tier 1 DEIS, Appendix B Section 5: Revenue Maximizing Analysis provides details regarding cost per passenger mile and provides high-level station pair fares. 

However, actual fares would be determined during future implementation and commissioning phases of the Project. The project website is 

http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoCharlotte.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I'm in favor of this service. We drive several times a year, at least 6, to visit family and we're getting older and would enjoy taking the train. I think 

the cost would be a factor for many customers. Will be interested in the development of this idea.

Tier 1 DEIS, Appendix B Section 5: Revenue Maximizing Analysis provides details regarding cost per passenger mile and provides high-level station pair fares. 

However, actual fares would be determined during future implementation and commissioning phases of the Project.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

As an individual who travels among Southern states frequently for both work and leisure, I am very supportive of the proposed rail line from Atlanta 

to Charlotte. My only concern would be the affordability argument. Will this be priced as an affordable alternative to air travel or car travel for 

those unable to afford or access those methods? I hope so.

Tier 1 DEIS, Appendix B Section 5: Revenue Maximizing Analysis provides details regarding cost per passenger mile and provides high-level station pair fares. 

However, actual fares would be determined during future implementation and commissioning phases of the Project.

10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

How expensive would riding be? Tier 1 DEIS, Appendix B Section 5: Revenue Maximizing Analysis provides details regarding cost per passenger mile and provides high-level station pair fares. 

However, actual fares would be determined during future implementation and commissioning phases of the Project.

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

How will taxes be lowered to adjust for this? The Purpose of the Project is not to lower taxes. Construction of this project is intended to meet the Project's Purpose and Need, which was estblished in a 

Scoping process. In essence, the intent is to provide a competitive transportation alternative to the existing auto and air system in the Atlanta to Charlotte 

corridor. It is not possible to add infite amounts of auto and air capacity. A specific source of funding has not been identified as yet but, like most major public 

works projects, construction is likely to use a combination of Federal and state funds. Like most high-speed rail projects in populous corridors, operation of 

the service is expected to be profitable and will not require ongoing government support. 

10/27/2019 Web 

Comment

The Greenville News article was incomplete in that although it stated some Capital Cost figures, it did not address the ongoing 

operational/maintenance costs. The Phoenix Arizona light rail, for example, has been an ongoing tax burden to the public, the vast majority of which 

never use it. The Phoenix rail system is heavily subsidized by the taxpayers, and this fact needs to be made clear. Large implementation cost and 

then ongoing operational/maintenance taxes to boot. Nothing is free despite what Democrats will tell you.

The proposed Project is currently in the planning and environmental analysis stages. The Alternatives vary significantly in their capital and operating costs and 

fare revenue so selection of the Preferred Alternative will have varying impacts on funding requirements. A funding source and project sponsor have not been 

identified for Tier 2 environmental review or construction of the Project. Atlanta - Charlotte has been identified as a major corridor and it is antipated that 

operations will be profitable, as is typical of high-speed rail in populous corridors.
10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

Would like more information on the planned stops for each of the corridors. Improvements/last mile connectivity at those nodes are key to the 

success of this plan. Also, I dont understand how the other routes have a higher revenue/costs than the existing crescent route. Can you explain 

that?

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with 

frequent service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two 

Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation of the route into 

Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred 

Alternatives will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided 

on the project website. A Project Sponsor and funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date. 

Local connectivity will be essential and will be a key element of planning. The speed and frequency of the other Alternatives will cost significantly more than 

the Southern Crescent to operate but will attract much larger numbers of riders. Operation is expected to be profitable, as is typical of high-speed rail in 

populous corridors.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I didn’t see much in the means of a cost effective analysis and return on investment. Is this public(Government) or private(ie Amtrak) funded? 

What’s the basis for the project? Reduction in traffic, safety, time savings, or etc.?

Construction of this project is intended to meet the Project's Purpose and Need, which was estblished in a Scoping process. In essence, the intent is to 

provide a competitive transportation alternative to the existing auto and air system in the Atlanta to Charlotte corridor. It is not possible to add infite 

amounts of auto and air capacity. A specific source of funding has not been identified as yet but, like most major public works projects, construction is likely 

to use a combination of Federal and state funds. Like most high-speed rail projects in populous corridors, operation of the service is expected to be profitable 

and will not require ongoing government support. Amtrak is heavily dependent upon the Federal government; Amtrak covers much of its operating costs, but 

most of its capital improvment projects are funded through Congressional appropriations.

Written 

Comment

Explore multiple operator options (airlines, etc). Explore PPP options for developing the corridor (i.e., the LEV South-Europe Atlantic, in France). 

Alternatives for raising construction funding will be considered in future phases of the Project Development process. Note that these approaches only change 

the payment plan; they do not reduce how much a project costs. Like most high-speed rail projects in populous corridors, operation of the service is expected 

to be profitable and will not require ongoing government support. Selection of the operator will also be done in a future phase. As of this FEIS/ROD, additional 

funding for the Project, both for Tier 2 analysis and for construction, has not been identified or secured. GDOT anticipates that construction funding will need 

to be a shared Federal/state effort, like most public works projects (including public-private partnership).

Written 

Comment

Open-up to multiple operators. Consider airlines as well as public operators (i.e., Luftuausa Express Rail) high speed freight (Amazon Prime/UPS/FedEx) (see Haly's Mercitalia)

Alternatives for raising construction funding will be considered in future phases of the Project Development process. Note that these approaches only change 

the payment plan; they do not reduce how much a project costs. Like most high-speed rail projects in populous corridors, operation of the service is expected 

to be profitable and will not require ongoing government support. Selection of the operator will also be done in a future phase. As of this FEIS/ROD, additional 

funding for the Project, both for Tier 2 analysis and for construction, has not been identified or secured. GDOT anticipates that construction funding will need 

to be a shared Federal/state effort, like most public works projects (including public-private partnership).

10/25/2019 Web 

Comment

Would it not be cheaper to add the necessary lanes to I-85, especially if there are many stops for the rail line which would slow the average speed of 

the train?

The Project's Purpose and Need (which appears in Section 3 of the Executive Summary) identifies the "Purpose of the Project is to improve intercity passenger 

travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region's transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and reliability through high-speed 

passenger rail system. In addition, lanes are being added to I-85, but these will use all available right-of-way. It is not possible to add infinite highway capacity. 

This project is intended to provide time competitive, reliable travel alternatives to alleviate congestion on existing transportation infrastructure.

10/23/2019 Web 

Comment

I feel that this is a waste of resources. The effort and money earmarked for this project would serve the citizens of Georgia better being used to find 

solutions to alleviate the congestion issues that plague the Atlanta metro area. Despite the belief by GDOT that adding more lanes doesn't help 

congestion, the NW corridor express lanes demonstrate that adding more lanes improves traffic flow.

The Project's Purpose and Need (which appears in Section 3 of the Executive Summary) identifies the "Purpose of the Project is to improve intercity passenger 

travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region's transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and reliability through high-speed 

passenger rail system. Lanes are being added to I-85 in both Georgia and South Carolina. However, these will use all available right-of-way. It is not possible to 

add infinite amounts of highway capacity. The purpose of this Project is to develop an alternative which is competitive with auto and air travel using proven 

high-speed rail technology.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

Passenger rails don’t get enough use as it is. Let alone spending a couple of billions of dollars on a new rail. How about invest that money into our 

own state and build a rail system to ease the congestion around the big 3 interstates ? Building a rail system going up 75, around 285 and up 85 

would be way more useful that from Atlanta to Charlotte

The elements within the Atlanta area suggested in the comment are part of the Scope of of this Project. An alignment for this portion of the route will be 

identified in the "Atlanta Approach" portion of a Tier 2 study. These tracks will have enough capacity to accomodate both intercity trains on several corridors 

and Atlanta area commuter rail trains.
10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

Money to be spent on an Atlanta to Charlotte commuter rail line would be better spent to complete the widening of I-85 between Jackson County 

and the SC line, including bridge replacement over Lake Hartwell. If this money is earmarked specifically for a commuter rail project it would be 

better spent on multiple shorter routes along the I-85 corridor such as Atlanta-Lawrenceville-Athens and Atlanta-Suwanee-Gainesville, as suggested 

in the ATL-CLT project. This would provide a greater benefit to metro Atlanta and NE Georgia exurban residents and still provide some benefit to 

people traveling between Atlanta and Charlotte, assuming easy access from the I-85 corridor (i.e., travel by car or bus to the northeasternmost 

station and then take the train). This would also help to backfill the opportunity lost when Gwinnett County rejected MARTA by providing an 

express rail alternative through Gwinnett as a replacement for MARTA heavy rail. There's not much time benefit to be had by running rail through 

rural areas, and we need to help the metro Atlanta area more than we need to help Charlotte and the SC upstate. This could benefit Charlotte more 

than Atlanta, and to Atlanta's long-term detriment. I understand and agree with the need to provide an alternative to the ATL airport, such as CHA 

or in this case CLT or GSP, but the politics of that may make this just that much more difficult. A more politically palatable alternative for Georgia's 

citizens might be high-speed rail down the I-75 corridor to MCN, particularly coupled with the truck express lanes being built, creating a central 

Georgia air freight and passenger hub. Also, we need to look at the pitfalls of running commuter rail lines on freight rail tracks or rights of way, as 

privately-owned freight rail lines have historically been resistant to other people using their facilities and/or have caused delays in construction and 

passenger rail schedules which have to work around freight traffic. Look at the problems with completing the Beltline where active freight lines are 

still present. If we could only build one line, I would start with the "Greenfield" line so as to not interfere with either CSX's or Norfolk Southern's 

tracks.

The Project's Purpose and Need (which appears in Section 3 of the Executive Summary) identifies the "Purpose of the Project is to improve intercity passenger 

travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region's transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and reliability through high-speed 

passenger rail system. Lanes are being added to I-85 in both Georgia and South Carolina. However, these will use all available right-of-way. It is not possible to 

add infinite amounts of highway capacity. The purpose of this Project is to develop an alternative which is competitive with auto and air travel using proven 

high-speed rail technology.

10/26/2019 Web 

Comment

Instead of spending this kind of money, which of course will be heavily weighted from tax dollars and also of course is underestimated, to put in fast 

rail without adequate justification as a need, the existing road system should be brought up to standards, i.e. pot holes filled. This sounds like 

someone just dreamed up something they wanted to play with at others' expense.

The Project's Purpose and Need (which appears in Section 3 of the Executive Summary) identifies the "Purpose of the Project is to improve intercity passenger 

travel between Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region's transportation system capacity, and improving trip time and reliability through high-speed 

passenger rail system. Lanes are being added to I-85 in both Georgia and South Carolina. However, these will use all available right-of-way. It is not possible to 

add infinite amounts of highway capacity. The purpose of this Project is to develop an alternative which is competitive with auto and air travel using proven 

high-speed rail technology.

10/29/2019 Web 

Comment

I am very much in favor of these as long as they are financially reasonable for everyone There are logical steps that need to be followed in developing a major passenger rail project such as this. Each step needs a project sponsor (which can 

change between steps). From the point at which this project is now, the primary remaining steps are:

1. This Tier 1 EIS process needs to be completed with issuance of the FEIS/ROD and publication of the ROD selecting the Preferred Alternative Corridor.

2. A Tier 2 environmental review must be conducted selecting a specific alignment within the corridor. This needs to include the Atlanta Approach and the 

Charlotte Approach; the corridor could be broken into separate Tier 2 environmental reviews with different Project Sponsors (potentially the three states).

3. Right-of-way acquisition/Design

4. Construction

5. Implementation/Commissioning

A project sponsor and funding source needs to be identified for each step. Also, please refer to the project newsletter for general timing and a listing of next 

steps 

http://www.dot.ga.gov/InvestSmart/Rail/Documents/Atl-Char/ATLCLT%20Newsletter_FINAL.pdfThe careful analysis called for in the defined Project 

Development process is intended to ensure that the Project will be delivered in the most cost-effective manner.

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

I believe it is of great importance that the general public in the Greenville area be well informed of the opportunities at hand with the rail service. I 

would greatly appreciate the opportunity to work with your group to get the information to every household. Please feel free to call text or email 

me to let me know how I can get involved. Tresa Lyle 255 A Street Greenville, SC 29609 poemillpark255@gmail.com 864-505-4154 Thank you, 

Tresa

Updates on the Atlanta to Charlotte Tier 1 EIS can be found at the GDOT website at http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoCharlotte or through joining the 

GDOT Atlanta to Charlotte mailing list by emailing AtlantaCharlotteHSR@dot.ga.gov to receive periodic project milestone updates. 

10/22/2019 Web 

Comment

How do we get people who normally do not support publicly funded projects to support this? If there is not enough support or money available 

from the government would a private organization be interested in building instead or funding along with our public governments?

There are logical steps that need to be followed in developing a major passenger rail project such as this. Each step needs a project sponsor (which can 

change between steps). From the point at which this project is now, the primary remaining steps are:

1.This Tier 1 EIS process needs to be completed with issuance of the FEIS/ROD and publica^on of the ROD selec^ng the Preferred Alterna^ve Corridor.

2.A Tier 2 environmental review must be conducted selec^ng a specific alignment within the corridor. This needs to include the Atlanta Approach and the 

Charlotte Approach; the corridor could be broken into separate Tier 2 environmental reviews with different Project Sponsors (potentially the three states).

3.Right-of-way acquisi^on/Design

4.Construc^on

5.Implementa^on/Commissioning

A project sponsor and funding source needs to be identified for each step. Also, please refer to the project newsletter for general timing and a listing of next 

steps 

http://www.dot.ga.gov/InvestSmart/Rail/Documents/Atl-Char/ATLCLT%20Newsletter_FINAL.pdf
10/19/2019 Web 

Comment

This would be wonderful. How can we get this funded so that it's possible to get it built sooner?

There are logical steps that need to be followed in developing a major passenger rail project such as this. Each step needs a project sponsor (which can 

change between steps). From the point at which this project is now, the primary remaining steps are:

1.This Tier 1 EIS process needs to be completed with issuance of the FEIS/ROD and publica^on of the ROD selec^ng the Preferred Alterna^ve Corridor.

2.A Tier 2 environmental review must be conducted selec^ng a specific alignment within the corridor. This needs to include the Atlanta Approach and the 

Charlotte Approach; the corridor could be broken into separate Tier 2 environmental reviews with different Project Sponsors (potentially the three states).

3.Right-of-way acquisi^on/Design

4.Construc^on

5.Implementa^on/Commissioning

A project sponsor and funding source needs to be identified for each step. Also, please refer to the project newsletter for general timing and a listing of next 

steps 

http://www.dot.ga.gov/InvestSmart/Rail/Documents/Atl-Char/ATLCLT%20Newsletter_FINAL.pdf

11/4/2019 Web 

Comment

1.Was there an RFP to conduct this por^on of the study? 2.What is the name of the actual contract under which this study is being conducted? 

3.Was there a project DBE outreach in Georgia or in any state by HNTB or GDOT? 4.My firm IDS Global is GDOT DBE and qualified to do corridor 

studies (Area Class 1.05); was a DBE firm from either involved state along the project corridor u^lized in this study to do engineering? 5.What is 

the DBE u^liza^on so far on this study for the past three months? 6.What was the African American u^liza^on on this study? 7.What is the 

current African American and overall DBE u^liza^on for the overall Contract under which this study is being conducted? 8.Did the corridor 

question importance of the Appalachain Trail with respect to the proposed Overground Rail, i.e., project date may coincide with 100th anniversary 

of Appalachian Trail? 9.Did the corridor analysis take into account and document similari^es and importance of the “Underground Railroad” with 

respect to the proposed Overground Rail? 10.The last GDOT disparity study showed underu^liza^on of African American owned firms on FHWA 

contracts; will there be an effort to involve a broader range of DBE’s on this project? Samuel Williams President IDS Global (770) 364-7914 

sam.williams@idsglobal.com

Yes, there was an RFP. Contract number is TOOIPSPC100674. Required 12% DBE participation for master contract, the overall annual goal for DBE 

participation on all federally funded projects when this project was executed. The Appalachain trail is not located in the Study Area and the Project would not 

cross the trail. 

10/28/2019 Web 

Comment

When o when will the public restrooms on the I-16 near Dublin be repaired??? It took many months to get them remodeled and they were lovely! 

They were only open for a few months and now both have been shut down for the entire summer and well into this fall. I have heard it is due to 

problems with the main water line to both. Also heard that this is the responsibility of the nearest town. This taxpayer wants it repaired NOW, 

whoever’s the one responsible!!! If this had occurred near Atlanta, it would have been fixed months ago! There truly are 2 Georgias.

This issue is not part of the Atlanta to Charlotte Tier 1 EIS. For more information and contact information for rest stops, please see this website 

http://www.dot.ga.gov/DS/Travel/RestAreas/. 
1

General Public Comments and Questions and FRA/GDOT Responses from the 

Tier 1 DEIS Public Comment Period

CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES

General support for project 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD 

(refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with frequent service 

operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield 

Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor Alternatives, although FRA 

and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and 

confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice 

of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages 

of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will remain a part 

of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. Project Sponsors and 

funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

General support for alternatives presented 

a. Greenfield Corridor Alternative

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD 

(refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with frequent service 

operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield 

Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor Alternatives, although FRA 

and GDOT did leave undecided until a Tier 2 analyses the exact route into Atlanta and 

confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice 

of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages 

of Project Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will remain a part 

of the project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the 

comment summaries will also be provided on the project website. Project Sponsors and 

funding for the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

b. I-85 Corridor Alternative

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Corridor Alternative has been identified in the 

FEIS/ROD (refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with frequent 

service operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the 

Greenfield Corridor. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor Alternatives, although FRA 

and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and 

confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice 

of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. 
2

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project 

Development. All comments regarding Preferred Alternatives will remain a part of the 

project record and will be summarized in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment 

summaries will also be provided on the project website. Project Sponsors and funding for 

the Tier 2 EIS analyses have not been identified to date.

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because this alternative performed the 

best in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. While the I-85 Corridor Alternative 

performed well, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor did not allow trains to reach maximum 

speeds, creating longer trips times and attracting lower level of ridership. The State DOTs 

also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects, particularly 

through South Carolina. Finally, the I-85 Corridor Alternative presents engineering 

challenges due to corridor constraints around Greenville, SC that would require a Project 

Sponsor to construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the I-85 Corridor 

Alternative’s performance are available in Chapter 3 of the EIS.

c. Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative 

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD 

(refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with frequent service 

operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield 

Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor Alternatives, although FRA and 

GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and confirmation 

of the route into Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice of propulsion 

technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this Alternative. 

Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages of Project 

Development. FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because it performed best 

in meeting the Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent 

Corridor Alternative because its geometry limited maximum speed, causing longer travel 

times that are not competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting a lower level of 

ridership. More than one Tier 2 study may be required prior to construction to define the 

corridor alignment, the propulsion technologies, the specific station locations, and detailed 

environmental impacts. 

As the Project continues to develop, municipalities could consider studying the feasibility 

of providing a connection to the Greenfield Corridor to allow easier access to the service. 

d. Preferred Either I-85 or Southern Crescent Corridors

Thank you for your support. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD 

(refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with frequent service 

operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield 

Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor Alternatives, although FRA 

and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and 

confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice 

of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. 
3

FRA selected the Greenfield Corridor Alternative because it performed best in meeting the 

Purpose and Need of the Project. FRA dismissed the Southern Crescent because the

corridor’s geometry limited maximum speeds, generating travel times that are not 

competitive with existing modes of travel, and attracting lower levels of ridership. FRA 

dismissed the I-85 Corridor because while the I-85 performed better than the Southern

Crescent Alternative, the geometry of the I-85 Corridor also did not allow trains to reach 

maximum speeds, creating longer trips times, and attracting less ridership. The State 

DOTs also expressed concern about preserving I-85 for future roadway projects,

particularly through South Carolina. Finally, the I-85 presents engineering challenges due 

to corridor constrains around Greenville, SC that would require the Project Sponsor to 

construct an elevated viaduct through the area. Details of the Corridor Alternative’s 

performance are available in Chapter 3 of the EIS. 

Unsupportive of project 

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD 

(refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with frequent service 

operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield 

Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor Alternatives, although FRA 

and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and 

confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice 

of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages 

of Project Development. The Tier 2 studies will also analyze environmental impacts at a 

detailed level. The public and other stakeholders will be informed throughout the study 

process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide the development of 

the study. All comments will remain a part of the project record and will be summarized 

in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Responses to the comment summaries will also be provided on 

the project website. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been identified 

for a Tier 2 study.

Are opposed to the Greenfield alignment, mostly due to environment concerns in the 

Greenville suburbs, notably where it is shown as close to the Enoree River

Thank you for your comment. A Preferred Alternative has been identified in the FEIS/ROD 

(refer to Section 2.1 in the FEIS/ROD) and it is for high-speed rail with frequent service 

operating on dedicated tracks without at-grade roadway crossings in the Greenfield 

Corridor Alternative. FRA dismissed the other two Corridor Alternatives, although FRA 

and GDOT did leave open until Tier 2 analyses of the exact route into Atlanta and 

confirmation of the route into Charlotte, as well as the location of stations and the choice 

of propulsion technology. North Carolina DOT and South Carolina DOT also support this 

Alternative. Detailed frequencies, schedules, and fares will be developed in further stages 

of Project Development.

In this Tier I EIS, FRA and GDOT performed a desktop-level review of environmental 

impacts that would result from this Project and did not perform any fieldwork as part of this 

study. A future Tier II study will select an exact route within the Greenfield Corridor 
4

Alternative, and will perform a detailed review, including fieldwork, to determine any

environmental impacts that result from the Project. FRA and the Project Sponsor will work 

with stakeholders to develop appropriate mitigation strategies for any environmental 

impacts that result from the Project. The public and other stakeholders will be informed 

throughout the study process and have opportunities to provide comments to help guide 

the development of the study. At this time, funding and a Project Sponsor have not been 

identified for a Tier II study. 

Concern about which stations would be served throughout the corridor, why these 

locations were chosen, and/or suggestions of additional stations or transit service that 

should be added along the corridor. 

For this Tier 1 EIS, station locations identified are considered potential areas for stations 

to be located. Precise locations will be determined in a future Tier 2 environmental review, 

using specific service-related metrics and further environmental analysis of the Preferred 

Alternative. 

The current station areas were influenced by the Project’s Purpose and Need (refer to 

Section 1.4 of the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD), as well as input from stakeholders and the public. 

Additionally, these station areas were selected based on analyzed ridership and potential 

travel-time impacts/benefits (refer to section 5.6 Ridership and Revenue of the DEIS 

Appendix B). Section 2.2.2.2 of the DEIS describes the refinement of the Corridor 

Alternatives and station locations. 

Consistent with the Project’s Purpose to connect the end-point cities of Charlotte and 

Atlanta, GDOT assumed the following station opportunities will be common throughout the 

three Corridor Alternatives (listed from north to south): 

• the future Charlotte Gateway Station; 

• the CLT airport (Charlotte’s airport); 

• a downtown Atlanta station; 

• and H-JAIA (Atlanta’s airport)

These anticipated stations are located along all three Corridor Alternatives and help meet 

the Purpose and Need by providing airport connectivity, transit access, and service 

between the downtowns of Atlanta and Charlotte. However, since the station locations 

have not been finalized for the Tier 1 EIS analysis, potential new stations and/or modified 

station locations along the identified Preferred Alternative are possible in a future Tier 2 

environmental review.

Potential for other cities to be connected or the line expanded 

See the response for No. 5 above regarding stations. As part of the Project’s Purpose and 

Need, the proposed high-speed rail line is part of the SEHSR corridor that currently proposes 

connections between Jacksonville, FL, Savannah and Atlanta GA, Columbia, SC, Charlotte 

and Raleigh, NC, Richmond, VA, and Washington, D.C. As of the commencement of this Tier 

1 EIS and the publication of this document in 2020, intercity passenger rail service is available 

in Charlotte provide connecting service to points north on the SEHSR corridor through 
5

Washington, D.C. to New York, NY. Additional service from Charlotte to Washington, D.C. is 

planned and documented as part of separate Tier 1 EIS and Tier 2 environmental review 

documents for the SEHSR corridor.

Refer to Section 1.2: About the Project, of the Tier 1 DEIS for more information on the SEHSR 

as it relates to this Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Please visit 

https://www.ncdot.gov/divisions/rail/projects/southeast-corridor/Pages/default.aspx for more 

information on the SEHSR corridor and developing projects in the Southeast region. Please 

visit the following link for additional GDOT Rail Planning documents, 

http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail

What is the general timeframe a Preferred Alternative would be selected? 

Once all public comments have been received and organized, the Preferred Alternative will 

be discussed in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD. Copies of the FEIS/ROD will be available online and 

also filed with regional libraries for public viewing. GDOT anticipates that the Record of 

Decision (ROD) will be simultaneously released with the FEIS/ROD in 2021. The ROD 

identifies the Preferred Alternative, presents the basis for the decision, and includes 

descriptions of the Corridor Alternatives considered. The ROD is the final step in the Tier 1 

EIS process, signifying approval of the proposed action. 

Main factors differentiating the 3 alternatives? What makes each one attractive? 

The main factors differentiating the three (3) Corridor Alternatives are location, operating 

speeds, travel times, anticipated ridership, capital cost, and ratio of fare revenue to operating 

cost. These factors demonstrate the alternative characteristics evaluated in the Tier 1 DEIS. 

Please refer to Exhibit 2-20: Summary of Alternatives, in the Tier 1 DEIS. 

The Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative is primarily located west of I-85 and has the 

slowest operating speeds, longest travel times, lowest ridership, and fares would be 

significantly lower than operating cost. The Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative has the 

ability to share the use of the existing Norfolk Southern Railway tracks and right-of-way and 

could serve as an expansion of the existing Amtrak Crescent service. Although this alternative 

has the lowest capital cost and has the ability to share and existing transportation corridor, 

the majority of the railroad corridor is either privately owned or heavily developed.

The I-85 Corridor Alternative inherently follows I-85 and has higher operating speeds, much 

shorter travel times, ridership five times as high as the Southern Crescent, and the highest 

capital cost, but fare revenue would be more than twice as high as operating cost. Following 

the highway right-of-way, which includes more gradual curves and gradients than the railroad 

alignment, provides a new passenger rail corridor that is competitive with automobile travel 

times between Atlanta and Charlotte. Although the I-85 Corridor Alternative has the ability to 

use publicly owned highway right-of-way, it has the highest capital cost due to the additional 

infrastructure needed to safely share the existing highway corridor.

The Greenfield Corridor Alternative is primarily located east of I-85 and has the fastest 

operating speeds, shortest travel times, highest ridership, capital cost substantially lower than 

the I-85 Corridor Alternative, and a ratio of fare revenue to operating cost very similar to I-85. 

The Greenfield Corridor Alternative provides an opportunity to construct a new corridor in a 

generally lesser developed area with more gradual terrain, which delivers a new passenger 
6

rail corridor that is the most competitive with automobile and air travel times between Atlanta 

and Charlotte. Although the Greenfield Corridor Alternative has the lowest capital cost, the 

majority of the corridor would require acquisition of right-of-way from private property owners. 

Unsupportive of Greenfield—how can the impact on developing counties and the 

destruction of family neighborhoods and property values be mitigated against ridership 

that will provide zero financial benefit to the county or those who will be displaced when 

there are options that utilize existing corridors? 

The Project would provide a corridor-wide benefit by adding capacity to the transportation 

network to supplement the existing air, rail, and highway transportation networks, and to help 

accommodate future employment and population growth in the region. The additional 

capacity would provide greater mobility for travelers between Atlanta and Charlotte whose 

transportation choices are currently limited to constrained air and highway networks.

Right-of-way impacts are unknown at this time. Right-of-way impacts, specific alignments, 

environmental impacts, mitigation measures, connections to local transit, etc. will be 

addressed in a future Tier 2 environmental review. During a future Tier 2 environmental 

review, public and stakeholder outreach will continue throughout the project development 

process. 

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires federal agencies to assess the 

environmental effects of their proposed actions prior to making decisions. FRA determined 

that a tiered NEPA process is appropriate for a project of this scale, as tiering involves a 

staged environmental review process applied to complex projects covering large geographic 

areas. 

For the project, this Tier 1 DEIS establishes:

• Purpose and Need 

• A broad assessment of the potential transportation, social, economic, and environmental 

impacts of Corridor Alternatives 

• The outcomes of public and agency coordination 

The Tier 1 DEIS also identifies general locations for potential stations; and discusses potential 

train technology, speed, and frequency necessary to support the Purpose and Need of the 

Project. After the public and interested agencies provide comments on the Tier 1 DEIS, FRA 

and GDOT will publish the Final Environmental Impact Statement/Record of Decision 

(FEIS/ROD). The FEIS/ROD will respond to comments on the Tier 1 DEIS, discuss any 

changes made since the release of the DEIS, and FRA and GDOT will select a Preferred 

Corridor Alternative that could be evaluated further in a Tier 2 environmental review. At this 

time, funding has not been identified to initiate a Tier 2 environmental review for the Atlanta 

to Charlotte corridor. 

Decisions that are discussed in this Tier 1 DEIS, but will be deferred to a Tier 2 environmental 

review include: station locations, rail alignment within the Preferred Corridor Alternative, 

airport connections, train technology, and the Atlanta Approach. Future NEPA steps following 

this Tier 1 DEIS could also include the following: (1) Tier 2 EIS; (2) Preliminary Engineering 
7

(could be concurrent with Tier 2 study); (3) Service Development Plan (could be concurrent 

with Tier 2 study); (4) Identification of Project Funding; (5) Final Design; (6) Right-of way 

(ROW) acquisition; and (7) Construction. Tier 2 EIS studies focus on the analysis of project 

and alignment specific impacts, whereas the Tier 1 EIS focuses on defining broader, corridorwide impacts.

Preliminary Engineering (PE) includes design work and analysis that leads to the production 

of construction plans and cost estimates for the Project. PE could include track alignment, 

station locations, bridge designs, and engineering and traffic surveys. Final Design 

concludes the engineering and design work with the production of final plans and prepares 

the project for right-of-way (ROW) acquisition and construction. A Service Development Plan 

(SDP) defines the service improvements, transportation network, operational and financial 

aspects for the Preferred Alternative selected through the NEPA process.

I am a 35 year Veteran of Blacksburg Volunteer Fire Department. I have seen numerous 

wrecks on I-85 and on the Norfolk Southern Line that runs through our town. In every event, 

speed has been a contributing factor. At 220 mph, you are asking for a major problem. 

Will this be on the existing Norfolk line that runs through Greenville SC to Charlotte?

The proposed train technology and speed options that could reach top speeds of 220 mph 

would have dedicated tracks with grade-separated highway-rail crossings. Federal regulations 

require that all highway-rail crossings be grade-separated where train speeds exceed 125 

mph. An exact alignment will be determined during a Tier 2 environmental study. In 2018, a 

rule change amending 49 CFR part 238 allows trains to operate at 220 mph in the United 

States. This final rule adds a new tier of passenger equipment safety standards (Tier III) to 

facilitate the safe implementation of nation-wide, interoperable high-speed passenger rail 

service at speeds up to 220 mph. While Tier III trainsets must operate in an exclusive rightof-way without grade crossings at speeds above 125 mph, these trainsets can share the rightof-way with freight trains and other tiers of passenger equipment at speeds not exceeding 125 

mph. This final rule also establishes crashworthiness and occupant protection performance 

requirements in the alternative to those currently specified for Tier I passenger trainsets. 

Please visit the Federal Register for more information: 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/11/21/2018-25020/passenger-equipmentsafety-standards-standards-for-alternative-compliance-and-high-speed-trainsets

There are huge concerns around rail safety and I’d like to understand how they will be 

safe.

A benefit of high-speed intercity rail as an alternative travel mode is its contribution to the 

overall net improvement in traveler safety. Based on national data provided by the Bureau of 

Transportation Statistics, between the years 2008 and 2013, rail service had lower fatality 

rates compared to auto and air travel. Implementing high-speed rail passenger service 

between Atlanta and Charlotte could potentially lower the incidence of fatalities within the 

Study Area. 
8

Fatalities by Travel Mode – United States 

Travel Mode 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Air 568 548 476 489 449 429

Highway 37,423 33,883 32,999 32,479 33,782 32,719

Water 854 865 821 904 765 642

*Train 317 252 269 256 239 242

Source: United States Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics1

*Includes train accidents and incidents at highway-rail grade crossings

The proposed train technology and speed options that could reach top speeds of 220 mph would 

have dedicated tracks with grade-separated highway-rail crossings. Federal regulations require 

that all highway-rail crossings be grade-separated where train speeds exceed 125 mph. In 2018, 

a rule change amending 49 CFR part 238 allows trains to operate at 220 mph in the United States. 

This final rule adds a new tier of passenger equipment safety standards (Tier III) to facilitate the 

safe implementation of nation-wide, interoperable high-speed passenger rail service at speeds 

up to 220 mph. While Tier III trainsets must operate in an exclusive right-of-way without grade 

crossings at speeds above 125 mph, these trainsets can share the right-of-way with freight trains 

and other tiers of passenger equipment at speeds not exceeding 125 mph. This final rule also 

establishes crashworthiness and occupant protection performance requirements in the alternative 

to those currently specified for Tier I passenger trainsets. Please visit the Federal Register for 

more information: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/11/21/2018-

25020/passenger-equipment-safety-standards-standards-for-alternative-compliance-and-highspeed-trainsets

ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS 

Will FRA or agencies other than GDOT be involved in sponsoring the project?

GDOT is the sponsor for this Tier 1 EIS; however, no sponsor has been identified for further 

phases of the Project. Because the proposed project corridor crosses three states and 

involves several larger metropolitan areas, other agencies or public/private partnership could 

sponsor future phases of the Project. In a Tier 2 environmental review, FRA would likely be 

the lead federal agency, but other federal agencies could also be involved. 

Will effects of carbon emissions/carbon footprint be considered? Would alternative fuels 

be considered? 

The DEIS discusses the preliminary effects of air quality and climate change at a high level 

during the Tier 1 EIS evaluation (refer to Section 3.4 of the DEIS and Section 1.4.2.7 of the 

 

1 https://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/national_transportation_statistics/html/table_02_01.html
9

DEIS). During the Tier 2 environmental review phase, a more detailed analysis of impacts and 

mitigation will be conducted of the Preferred Alternative and technologies to be utilized. The 

Greenfield has the greatest potential to divert trips from highway and air travel, followed 

closely by I-85, whereas the Southern Crescent Corridor, while more competitive with bus 

travel, only diverts a negligible amount of highway and air travel. GDOT expects that the 

Greenfield and I-85 Corridor Alternatives would have the greatest reduction in vehicular 

emissions, based on modal shift projections.

When will more information regarding environmental impacts be available?

Tier 1 DEIS analysis for environmental impacts is discussed in Chapter 3: Affected 

Environment and Environmental Consequences. Contingent upon additional funding and 

project sponsor, a future Tier 2 environmental review will evaluate the Preferred Alternative 

with more details and analysis, including field verification efforts. The Tier 2 environmental 

review level of effort will also include avoidance, minimization and mitigation measures. 

However, a timeframe and sponsor for a Tier 2 environmental review have not been identified. 

If properly utilized by citizens, what are the environmental benefits?

It is unknown at this time what the overall environmental benefits would be, but GDOT 

anticipates that the Project will have a positive environmental benefit due to trips diverted from 

auto and air to rail. The diverted trip summary is included in the Tier 1 DEIS Exhibit 3.7-11: 

Number of Auto-trips Diverted Annually. Additionally, please refer to the Tier 1 DEIS Exhibit 

3-5: Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts for other environmental measures across 

the Corridor Alternatives. A future Tier 2 environmental review will further define what benefits, 

if any, the proposed project will have on the surrounding environment. The Greenfield has the 

greatest potential to divert trips from highway and air travel, followed closely by I-85, whereas 

the Southern Crescent Corridor, while more competitive with bus travel, only diverts a 

negligible amount of highway and air travel. GDOT expects that the Greenfield and I-85 

Corridor Alternatives would have the greatest reduction in vehicular emissions, based on 

modal shift projections. Additionally, both the Greenfield and I-85 alternatives consider the 

use of electric train technology, which would generate an even greater reduction of emissions 

pollutants when compared to diesel service. The Tier 2 environmental study will include a 

detailed air quality assessment and detailed analysis of diesel and electric train technology. 

What would be the overall environmental impacts to resources such as wildlife, waters, 

and greenspace? 

A future Tier 2 environmental review of the Preferred Alternative will evaluate the potential for 

environmental impacts to all resources. Specific impacts to environmental resources are 

currently unknown in this process. However, Table 3-3 in the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD provides a 

summary of potential environmental impacts. Parklands, Wildlife Refuges, and Recreational 

Areas Impacts can be found in Section 3.7 of the DEIS; Water Resources Impacts can be 

found in Section 3.9 of the DEIS; and Biological Resource Impacts can be found in Section 

3.10 of the DEIS. 
10

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires federal agencies to assess the 

environmental effects of their proposed actions prior to making decisions. FRA determined 

that a tiered NEPA process is appropriate for a project of this scale, as tiering involves a 

staged environmental review process applied to complex projects covering large geographic 

areas. 

For the project, this Tier 1 DEIS establishes:

• Purpose and Need 

• A broad assessment of the potential transportation, social, economic, and 

environmental impacts of Corridor Alternatives 

• The outcomes of public and agency coordination 

The Tier 1 DEIS also identifies general locations for potential stations; and discusses potential 

train technology, speed, and frequency necessary to support the Purpose and Need of the 

Project. After the public and interested agencies provide comments on the Tier 1 DEIS, FRA 

and GDOT will publish the Final Environmental Impact Statement/Record of Decision 

(FEIS/ROD). The FEIS will respond to comments on the Tier 1 DEIS, discuss any changes 

made since the release of the DEIS, and FRA and GDOT will select a Preferred Corridor 

Alternative that could be evaluated further in a Tier 2 environmental review. At this time, 

funding has not been identified to initiate a Tier 2 environmental review for the Atlanta to 

Charlotte corridor. 

Decisions that are discussed in this Tier 1 DEIS, but will be deferred to a Tier 2 environmental 

review include: station locations, rail alignment within the Preferred Corridor Alternative, 

airport connections, train technology, and the Atlanta Approach. Future NEPA steps following 

this Tier 1 DEIS could also include the following: (1) Tier 2 EIS; (2) Preliminary Engineering 

(could be concurrent with Tier 2 study); (3) Service Development Plan (could be concurrent 

with Tier 2 study); (4) Identification of Project Funding; (5) Final Design; (6) Right-of way 

(ROW) acquisition; and (7) Construction. Tier 2 EIS studies focus on the analysis of project 

and alignment specific impacts, whereas the Tier 1 EIS focuses on defining broader, corridorwide impacts.

Preliminary Engineering (PE) includes design work and analysis that leads to the production 

of construction plans and cost estimates for the Project. PE could include track alignment, 

station locations, bridge designs, and engineering and traffic surveys. Final Design concludes 

the engineering and design work with the production of final plans and prepares the project 

for right-of-way (ROW) acquisition and construction. A Service Development Plan (SDP) 

defines the service improvements, transportation network, operational and financial aspects 

for the Preferred Alternative selected through the NEPA process.

Does the environmental analysis look at the entire life cycle of the construction process? 

Evaluating the construction process is not a part of this Tier 1 EIS. Additional environmental 

analysis of the environmental impacts on the Preferred Alternative will be conducted in a Tier 

2 environmental review, including construction related impacts. 
11

Are all the impacts negative? Diverting car trips would be a positive impact right - so the 

blue symbol is best? However, impacts to minority and lower income groups are assumed 

to be negative impacts right? - so the green symbol is best for that row? It's hard to 

compare alternatives without at least a little more detail or clarification, or at least 

presentation of the impacts in a comparable way.

The symbols 

(http://www.dot.ga.gov/InvestSmart/Rail/AtlCharPublicMeetings/8%20Environmental_Comp

arison.pdf) were utilized in the graphics for public involvement to help simplify the more robust 

table in the Chapter 3 of the DEIS. The symbols did not represent positive or negative impacts 

but rather the highest or lowest potential for impacts. Please see the Table below for more 

details about the Project’s potential environmental impacts. In addition, Chapter 3 of the DEIS 

goes into detail about the potential environmental impacts of each of the Corridor Alternatives. 

Summary Potential Environmental Impacts

Corridor Alternative

Measures Southern 

Crescent 

with NS 

Atlanta 

Approach

Southern 

Crescent 

with CSX 

Atlanta 

Approach

I-85

with NS 

Atlanta 

Approach

I-85

with CSX 

Atlanta 

Approach

Greenfield 

with NS 

Atlanta 

Approach

Greenfield 

with CSX 

Atlanta 

Approach

Percentage of 

automobile trips 

diverted to rail 

(2050, rounded)

1% 3% 4%

Percentage of air 

trips diverted to 

rail (2050, 

rounded)

n/a* 8% 10%

Percentage of 

intercity bus rips 

diverted to rail 

(2050, rounded)

19% 19% 15%

Number of 

potential noise 

receptor impacts

11,872 11,310 7,163 6,963 9,628 9,246

Number of 

potential 

vibrationreceptor impacts

29 37 21 26 145 149
12

Percentage of 

Census Block 

Groups meeting 

EJ criteria for 

Minority 

Population

44.7% 43.2% 42.1% 41.8% 37.7% 37.2%

Percentage of 

Census Block 

Groups meeting 

EJ criteria for 

Low-Income 

Population

34.1% 30.11% 26.8% 23.7% 22.7% 19.02%

Parklands and 

Wildlife Refuges 

Sites (number)

28 33 21 26 17 22

Parklands and 

Wildlife Refuges 

(acres)

950.7 937.65 74.88 107.71 48.01 66.18

Known Historic 

Resources 

(number)

117 110 52 49 44 37

Community 

Facilities 

(number)

366 354 187 185 120 116

Wetlands (acres) 45 100 148 194 130 169

Waterbody 

Crossings 

(number)

169 270 462 525 566 629

Floodplains 

(acres)

494 918 762 1,181 738 1,129

Known 

Threatened and 

Endangered 

Species Habitats 

(number)

38 41 38 41 35 38

Natural 

Terrestrial 

Habitat (acres)

6,312 7,517 2,688 3,893 10,520 10,854
13

Note: Analysis of environmental resources is presented for each combination of Corridor Alternative and Atlanta 

Approach, except for transportation impact, since the two Atlanta Approaches have similar performance from an 

operational and ridership standpoint. The NS option is used as the representative Atlanta Approach for 

transportation impacts. 

Sources and methodologies for each resource are discussed in the following sections of this chapter. 

*As described in DEIS Appendix B, air travel diversion was modeled for the I-85 and Greenfield Corridor 

Alternatives, but not the Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative. GDOT determined that the level of service 

provided by the Southern Crescent would not be competitive with air travel, primarily due to the longer travel time. 

TECHNOLOGY

Benefit of diesel versus electric train technologies?

Diesel trains do not require the infrastructure and higher capital cost associated with installing 

electrification along the corridor. The lesser capital cost could enable diesel technology to be 

implemented as an earlier phase of development of passenger service along the corridor. 

Diesel technology is also consistent with the trains that operate on the SEHSR corridor north 

of Charlotte. The lesser speed, however, results in a lower ridership and higher operating cost. 

The lower ridership reduces the revenue generated to offset operation and maintenance 

costs. Electrification could be installed at a later date.

Benefit of electric versus diesel train technologies? 

Electric trains can operate at up to 220 mph where track alignment curvature is limited and 

can accelerate faster than diesel trains to further reduce trip times. Electric trains have lower 

operating and maintenance cost, are quieter, and have no emissions at the point of use. The 

higher speed generates more ridership and revenue which supports a more frequent train 

schedule and reduces operation and maintenance costs. This will be evaluated further in Tier 

2 environmental review. 

Was the Maglev option considered?

Maglev technology was not evaluated in this Tier 1 EIS, but could be considered in a Tier 2 

environmental review.

Will the track be elevated or ground level? What type of barriers would be in place to muffle 

noise? Will a noise analysis be performed to show sound levels along the proposed track, 

and will this be made available to the public? 

Several factors will determine if the track will be elevated such as topography, track vertical 

geometry requirements and separation of roadway crossings. For this Tier 1 EIS, GDOT 

assumed that the track would likely both be elevated and at ground level at various locations 

along the corridor alternatives. The Southern Crescent Corridor Alternative route will primarily 

only be at existing ground level following the existing railroad alignment grade. The I-85 

Corridor Alternative will follow the grade of the existing highway in segments where proposed 

in the highway median. In constrained segments where construction the track in the median 

is not feasible, the railroad corridor will be elevated above the highway and interchanges. 
14

GDOT assumes that the Greenfield Corridor Alternative alignment would be built at ground 

level unless required by terrain conflicts, the need to separate above or under roadways, 

and/or minimize impacts to adjacent properties and sensitive environmental areas. These are 

just some of the factors that will determine if the track will be elevated above existing ground 

or kept at or near ground level. Noise analysis was performed as part of the Tier 1 DEIS and 

summarized in Chapter 3 – Section 3.5.

This Tier 1 EIS identifies potential receptors as a measure of potential impacts. This level of 

analysis does not indicate a negative noise or vibration impact, but the estimated number of 

possible noise and vibration receptors located within each Corridor Alternative. A Tier 2 

environmental review will conduct a detailed noise and vibration analysis of the Preferred 

Corridor Alternative, and explore noise and vibration impacts related to construction activities 

and station areas. The Tier 2 environmental review will also identify mitigation strategies for 

the selected alignment, technology, and station areas.

More detailed noise analysis will be part of a future Tier 2 environmental review of the 

Preferred Alternative.

Has anyone researched or discussed an underground option? The state already owns the 

land, use I-85 as a guide. 

The Tier 1 EIS did not consider or evaluate an underground option for any of the Corridor 

Alternatives or sections of a Corridor Alternative. Tunneling costs are typically much higher 

than at-grade construction and, in some instances, alignments that are elevated on structure. 

Tunneling of sections of the corridor could be considered in Tier 2 environmental reviews if 

feasible, cost effective, or required to avoid existing obstacles. 

What is being done to explore new tech solutions for passenger and freight like AirTrac. 

https://airtractransport.com. How can a company like AirTrac participate in the process?

The Tier 1 EIS did not explore alternative technology solutions like AirTrac. AirTrac 

participation could be considered in a future Tier 2 environmental review. However, a project 

sponsor and funding source has not been identified yet. The I-85 and Greenfield Corridor 

Alternatives were designed for dedicated passenger rail use; however, the design standards

do not preclude freight operations in the future. Adding freight traffic to the Alternatives was 

not evaluated as a part of this Tier I EIS. 

PUBLIC MEETINGS/LOGISTICS 

Why were meetings not advertised in newspapers?

Following the federal legal advertisement requirements for public involvement, these meetings 

were advertised 30 days in advance of the meeting in the Atlanta Journal Constitution (AJC) 

starting on 9/25/19, the Charlotte Observer on 9/24/19, and The Greenville News on 9/25/19. 

A second round of legal notices were advertised a week in advance of the meeting in the AJC, 

Charlotte Observer, and The Greenville News. Additionally, National Public Radio (NPR) in 
15

Atlanta advertised the meetings on 10/22/19 on their morning radio show, and NPR in 

Charlotte hosted a one hour show on the Project and overall high-speed rail in a program 

called "Charlotte Talks" on 10/23/19. News outlets and various social media posts were also 

included as a part of advertisements for the public meetings. The meeting materials were 

also available online as well as in the DOT offices of each state through the public comment 

period.

Meetings should be held in locations where the lines are being proposed.

GDOT and FRA selected meeting locations based on major population centers identified 

along the proposed project corridor. Future meetings for the public will be included as part of 

a Tier 2 environmental review, if a sponsor and a funding source are identified to advance the 

development of the Preferred Alternative. 

Meetings were not announced early enough.

Following the federal legal advertisement requirements for public involvement, these meetings 

were advertised 30 days in advance of the meeting in the Atlanta Journal Constitution (AJC) 

starting on 9/25/19, the Charlotte Observer on 9/24/19, and The Greenville News on 9/25/19. 

A second round of legal notices were advertised a week in advance of the meeting in the AJC, 

Charlotte Observer, and The Greenville News. Additionally, NPR in Atlanta advertised the 

meetings on 10/22/19 on their morning radio show, and NPR in Charlotte hosted a one hour 

show on the Project and overall high speed in a program called "Charlotte Talks" on 10/23/19. 

News outlets and various social media posts were also included as a part of advertisements 

for the public meetings. All partners advertised the meetings. The meeting materials were also 

available online as well as in the DOT offices of each state through the public comment period. 

INTERMODAL

What are the benefits of a high-speed rail line vs air travel? What would be the cost per 

mile? 

Please see Exhibit 1-8 in Chapter 1 of the DEIS for a comparison of travel modes and average 

travel times for automobile vs. air travel, the table can also be seen below. Also, see Exhibit 

2-20 in Chapter 2 of the DEIS for potential travel times for the three Corridor Alternatives. 

High-speed rail service would provide many direct benefits for travel along the corridor. A 

high-speed rail line would provide direct service multiple cities and stations, increasing 

connectivity and accessibility for communities along the corridor. High-speed rail service 

would also provide similar door-to-door travel times as air service between endpoints when 

taking into account travel time to the airport and to clear security protocol. By shifting travelers 

from air to rail, additional capacity will become available at the region’s congested airports to 

allow for longer distance flights. Rail service also produces less emission pollutants than air 

travel. A Tier 2 study will consider diesel vs electric train technology types, if electric 

technology is selected, the reduction in emissions would be even greater. 
16

Comparison of Existing Travel Modes and Proposed Corridor Alternatives

Travel Mode Frequency of Trips

(Round Trips)

Average Travel Time between Atlanta and 

Charlotte

Automobile

I-85 N/A 3 hours, 45 minutes2

I-20, I-77 N/A 4 hours, 43 minutes

3

Intercity Bus 14 5 hours, 14-16 minutes, depending on carrier

Intercity Rail

Amtrak Crescent 1 5 hours, 17 minutes4

Air 36

American 18 1 hour 17 minutes (direct flight time only)5

Delta 18 1 hour, 10 minutes (direct flight time only) 6

Passenger Rail Proposed 

Corridor Alternatives

Crescent 4 4 hours, 35 minutes to 5 hours, 34 minutes 

I-85 14 2 hours, 42 minutes** to 2 hours, 50 minutes

Greenfield 16-22* 2 hours, 6 minutes** to 2 hours, 44 minutes

* With electric high-speed technology, 22 round trips can be supported

** Potential travel times for electric high-speed technologies 

Sources: HNTB Revenue and Ridership Results, May 2013; Websites of Greyhound, Megabus, and 

Amtrak; Google maps 

Costs can vary by alternative and the Corridor Alternatives have had a limited amount of 

engineering performed to date. From Appendix B (Alternatives Development Report) section 

5.9.2 Capital Cost Estimates, the per mile cost (2013 dollars) for the Southern Crescent 

Corridor Alternative 110MPH service is 271 miles in length with a cost per mile of $8.5M; for 

the I-85 Corridor Alternative (180MPH) length is 266 miles with a cost per mile of $57.8M; and 

for the Greenfield Corridor Alternative (220MPH), length is 273 miles with a cost per mile of

$30.9M. 

How or will this connect with MARTA? 

See above response to stations. Since stations, at this juncture, are described as general 

areas and not exact locations, how the proposed high-speed rail service will connect with 

MARTA has not been determined yet. However, as the MARTA system looks today, potential 

connections with MARTA rail service will be at the Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport and 

 

2 Travel times reflect start/end points from city-centers of Charlotte and Atlanta Google Maps Driving Directions, assumes 

vehicles are driving the posted speed limits

3 Travel times reflect start/end points from city-centers of Charlotte and Atlanta. Google Maps Driving Directions, assumes 

vehicles are driving the posted speed limits

4 Amtrak, http://www.amtrak.com/home (accessed on 1/31/18)

5 Estimate based on information provided by searching for weekday flights between Atlanta and Charlotte 

6 Estimate based on information provided by searching for weekday flights between Atlanta and Charlotte 
17

downtown Atlanta. Station locations and potential for local transit connections will be further 

evaluated in a Tier 2 environmental review. 

Who will be responsible for ROW maintenance, coordination of passenger and freight 

traffic, and mediation between the two entities (CSX and passenger rail authority) if 

existing rail is utilized? 

A Service Development Plan (SDP) was not developed for this Tier 1 EIS, but will be 

developed during a future Tier 2 environmental review, and will outline how the proposed highspeed rail service will be operated, dispatched and maintained. Only the Southern Crescent 

Alternative assumes significant shared use of existing track. Maintenance of the right-of-way 

and freight rail coordination is also deferred to a future Tier 2 environmental review.

I am very much in favor of the new corridor solution for high-speed trains between 

Charlotte and Atlanta, but I believe the train should allow vehicles to be carried, meaning 

passengers can drive their cars on to the train in Charlotte and then once in Atlanta (two 

hours later) they can drive off.

Allowing vehicles to be carried on the proposed high-speed rail service from Atlanta to 

Charlotte does not meet the Purpose and Need of the project. Based on the Study Area’s 

existing and future travel demand and transportation system capacity, there is a need to 

supplement Interstate highways and other travel modes to increase system capacity by 

diverting more trips from these modes to trains. The Project would supplement the Study 

Area’s transportation system capacity and serve as an alternative to automobile trips by 

connecting with other local transit options.

Travel time and reliability is also an important Need defined in the DEIS, which could be 

hindered by the addition of allowing automobiles onto the trains. Deficiencies with the existing 

transportation system hinder travel time reliability between Atlanta and Charlotte. To improve 

intercity travel and mobility between Atlanta and Charlotte, a proposed travel mode must 

provide competitive travel times and reliability in comparison to existing modes. The Study 

Area’s projected travel demand, resulting from population and employment growth, further 

underscores the need for a travel mode that offers competitive and reliable travel times. 

Amtrak offers the Auto Train, a train that transports cars and their owners from Lorton, VA to 

Sanford, FL. 

GENERAL

How will the rail line benefit rural areas?

In addition to the overall benefits that the entire service area could enjoy from a new highspeed rail service, the rural areas will benefit from a new service that provides an additional 

travel mode with stations spaced at reasonable intervals along each of the corridors compared 

in the DEIS. Additionally, the Project would provide a corridor-wide benefit by adding capacity 

to the transportation network to supplement the existing air and highway transportation 

networks and to help accommodate future employment and population growth in the region. 

The additional capacity would provide greater mobility for travelers in the corridor between 
18

Atlanta and Charlotte whose transportation choices are currently limited to constrained air and 

highway networks.

How will the City of Tucker benefit from this? 

In addition to the overall benefits that the entire service area could potentially enjoy from a 

new high-speed rail service, specific benefits for residents of the City of Tucker will depend 

on the alignment chosen for the approach to downtown Atlanta. A discussion of the Atlanta 

Approach can be found in the DEIS in Section 2.2.2.2 Phase 2 - Refinement of Corridor 

Alternatives. In this Tier 1 EIS, FRA did not select an Atlanta Approach Instead, the Atlanta 

approach will be subject of a subsequent Tier 2 environmental review which will be focused 

on identifying the optimal corridor for extending passenger rail into and through the Atlanta 

area. 

Has there been work conducted as part of the Statewide Transportation Plan or by ARC to 

specifically identify the problems/needs of intercity travel? If so, what are they and how 

would/is this project expected to meet those needs? 

Please refer to Chapter 1 of the DEIS, specifically Section 1.1, for a timeline of other initiatives 

conducted within the Study Area. The State Rail Plan identifies this corridor in Georgia’s 

Proposed Passenger Rail Improvements and Investments in Section 3.3.2 Atlanta – Charlotte. 

The State Rail Plan can be viewed here: http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/StateRailPlan. 

Additional passenger rail planning documents completed by GDOT can be found here: 

http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail. See Chapter 2 of the DEIS for potential benefits as far as travel 

times, number of daily round trips, and other potential benefits. Ongoing coordination with 

state agencies and regional governments will continue throughout the Tier 1 EIS, any future 

Tier 2 environmental review, and subsequent implementation steps. 

What hours would trains run? 

Tier 1 DEIS Appendix B Section 5.7.2: Alternative Stopping Patterns and Schedules provides 

sample times when trains would run for this stage of the planning process. Schedules, 

frequencies and stopping patterns will be evaluated further in a future Tier 2 environmental 

review as well as a subsequent Service Development Plan. 

What is the cost per passenger? How many trains per day? Will it connect to Washington 

DC, NYC, and Boston? 

Tier 1 DEIS Appendix E Section 6: Revenue Maximizing Analysis provides details regarding 

cost per passenger mile. For the purposes of this study, fares were estimated based on the 

distance between station pairs, the cost to access an origin and destination station, and a 

boarding fee. However, passenger ticket prices will be further defined as part of a future 

Service Development Plan and would be determined by the operator and other partners. As 

of the commencement of this Tier 1 EIS and the publication of this document in 2020, intercity 

passenger rail service is available in Charlotte to provide connecting service to points north 

on the SEHSR corridor through Washington, D.C. to New York, NY. Additional service from 

Charlotte to Washington, D.C. is planned and documented as part of separate Tier 1 EIS and 
19

Tier 2 environmental review documents for the SEHSR corridor. GDOT anticipates that 

connections for service to Washington D.C., New York, NY and Boston, MA will continue to 

be available at the Charlotte Gateway Station. Fare, frequency and connectivity will be 

evaluated further in a future Tier 2 environmental review. 

Were any participants from disability organizations consulting parties? 

Disability organizations were not identified as consulting parties for the Tier 1 EIS. The Tier 1 

DEIS states that any future design and more specifically related to stations and train 

equipment will be required to be ADA compliant. 

Why do we need this new rail system? Who will use it and has a survey been conducted 

to determine need? 

Prior to establishing the Project’s Need and Purpose, a scoping phase was conducted with 

stakeholders and agencies to discuss goals and objectives that ultimately determined a need 

for the Project. Once this step in the Tier 1 EIS process was complete, the Project’s purpose 

was established, which is to improve intercity passenger travel between Atlanta and Charlotte 

by expanding the region’s transportation system capacity and improving trip time and reliability 

through high-speed passenger rail services. The Project will provide transportation system 

capacity necessary to accommodate current and projected population and economic growth 

occurring along the SEHSR Corridor network including the following metropolitan areas in the 

Piedmont Atlantic Megaregion: Atlanta, Charlotte, Greenville, and Spartanburg. GDOT has 

identified eight transportation system needs relevant to the Study Area, each corresponding 

to the anticipated population and employment growth with increasing travel demand. The 

Project will satisfy the following needs: population and employment growth; improve regional 

transportation system connectivity; increase transportation system capacity; improve travel 

times and reliability; provide an alternative travel mode; traveler safety; improve energy 

efficiency and air quality; and maintain and enhance economic growth and vitality. 

The Project Purpose and Need can be referenced in Section 3.1 of the Tier I FEIS/ROD. For 

ridership, please see Chapter 2 of the DEIS, specifically Section 2.2.2.5 (Ridership and 

Revenue) and also Appendix B of the DEIS (Alternatives Development Report), specifically 

Section 5.6.

Greenfield route doesn't have the road names on the map. Is there a more detailed 

schematic or listing of routes? 

Please see Appendix A, Parts 6 and 7 of the Tier 1 DEIS map books. GDOT can provide GIS 

or KMZ files upon request. 

How will public concerns be considered when choosing a Preferred Alternative? 

Following the public and agency comment period, FRA and GDOT will select a Preferred 

Alternative and document this process, likely in a combined Final EIS/ROD document. GDOT 

will base the Preferred Alternative decision on feedback and comments from the public and

agencies, performance of each Corridor Alternative, and the potential environmental impacts 
20

of each Corridor Alternative. The Final EIS/ROD document includes a list of all revisions made 

to address feedback received during the 45-day Tier 1 DEIS review period. 

Is there a pressing transportation need for a destination in Charlotte? Shouldn't rapid rail 

to Chattanooga, Savannah, Macon, or Valdosta be considered first? 

Please see Chapter 1 of the Tier 1 DEIS, specifically Section 1.4 for the Project’s Purpose 

and Need statement. For ridership, please see Chapter 2 of the DEIS, specifically Section 

2.2.2.5 (Ridership and Revenue). Please see this website for more information on the overall 

SEHSR Corridor, https://www.ncdot.gov/divisions/rail/projects/southeastcorridor/Pages/about.aspx. Discussions regarding the Savannah and Macon Corridors are 

included in the Georgia State Rail Plan (http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/StateRailPlan). 

There is a need for a competitive alternative to auto and air travel modes in the corridor 

between Atlanta and Charlotte (including major intermediate travel destinations) that 

accommodates the Study Area’s existing and forecasted population and employment growth. 

Current transportation system-capacity constraints and the estimated increase in travel 

demand substantiate this need (See Section 7 of Chapter 3 of the Tier 1 DEIS for further 

information). Contemporary travel patterns also require alternative transportation choices for 

those who cannot or choose not to drive, and those seeking alternatives to congested 

highways, airports, and other transportation modes. 

What is your plan to actually make this happen in a timely fashion? How are you going to 

timely secure the necessary Right of Way for a project of this magnitude? 

A project sponsor and funding source for Tier 2 environmental review or construction of the 

Project has not been identified. Thus, specific time tables for right-of-way acquisition and/or 

construction is not available at this time.

This FEIS/ROD identifies the Greenfield as the Preferred Alternative Corridor for the Atlanta 

to Charlotte high-speed rail line. The next step in the Project Development process will be a 

Tier 2 environmental review which will identify a specific alignment within the corridor. The 

project sponsor (typically a state DOT) could rely on the outcome of the Tier 2 environmental 

review to identify and procure right-of-way. The project sponsor for the design and actual 

construction could be led by state DOTs. However, as is currently being done in Florida and 

Texas, the design and construction are sponsored by a private, for profit partnership.

Will they be express and local trains? 

Tier 1 DEIS Appendix B Section 5.7.2: Alternative Stopping Patterns and Schedules provides 

information regarding stopping patterns for express and local trains considered in the Tier 1 

EIS analysis. Schedules and stopping patterns will be evaluated further in a future Tier 2 

environmental review. 

My main concern is human trafficking though; how will these be monitored/ patrolled to 

ensure people aren’t being trafficked? 
21

Safety and security of passengers is always a top priority for safe public transportation. Human 

trafficking would be addressed in a service safety plan that would be required by federal and 

state agencies as part of the implementation and commissioning of service on the corridor 

after the completion of Tier 1 and Tier 2 environmental reviews. 

Where can we receive updates about the Project? 

Updates on the Atlanta to Charlotte Tier 1 EIS can be found at the GDOT website at 

http://www.dot.ga.gov/IS/Rail/AtlantatoCharlotte or through joining the GDOT Atlanta to 

Charlotte mailing list by emailing AtlantaCharlotteHSR@dot.ga.gov to receive periodic project 

milestone updates. 

What is the impact on the workforce? Even with more people living in GVL and commuting 

to Atlanta or Charlotte (which could better employment for some) there may still be some 

who commute to GVL and could be taking up jobs here. What are the projections for 

unemployment to decrease here for those of low income (increasing economic mobilitywe are one of the lowest in the country)? Without more opportunities given to work than 

taken from outsiders for this group it could further worsen this detrimental problem.

Each of the Corridor Alternatives would improve mobility in the region by adding a new mode 

of transportation to increase accessibility to employment, air transportation, and opportunities 

for education, recreation, and commercial facilities. While all Corridor Alternatives serve the 

same end points, they don’t all serve the same intermediate populations. For example, only 

the Greenfield Corridor serves Athens. Therefore, depending on the Corridor Alternative, 

different populations would receive the accessibility benefits from the proposed service. 

Population and employment levels within the Study Area are expected to increase by 2040. 

The largest population and employment growth is expected to occur within Gwinnett County 

(Metro-Atlanta) and Mecklenburg County (Metro-Charlotte). Population and employment 

levels could further grow due to land development occurring at proposed station locations and 

along the corridor as an indirect effect of the Project. 

In the Tier 2 analysis, a project sponsor will determine the proposed station locations, storage 

and maintenance facility locations, and the exact alignment configuration. The analysis will 

also further explore impacts to employment and socioeconomics, related to the following 

topics:

• Property acquisitions and residential and business relocations,

• Relocation analysis to determine adequate real estate availability,

• Community cohesion, including residential neighborhoods,

• Population and employment growth as a result of the project,

• Viewshed and aesthetics impacts on the surrounding communities, and

• Demand on community facilities.

A train between Atlanta and other local large cities is an excellent idea to increase the 

economic development of the south region. An even better idea would be commuter trains 

from Atlanta to; Alpharetta, Kennesaw and, Gwinnett. Traffic along 400, 75, and 85 needs 
22

a mass transit solution for economic and environmental reasons as well as to reduce 

congestion and allow inner city businesses to attract talent.

One of the goals of the Project is to support the development of planned multimodal 

transportation hubs that complement existing and planned transit services. With respect to 

improving regional transportation systems linkages, providing seamless connections to local 

transportation systems along the corridor is equally important to improving mobility. The 

Project will improve transportation options along the corridor by integrating with other local 

and regional travel networks, such as Atlanta’s Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority 

(MARTA) and the Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS), travel nodes such as H-JAIA and 

CLT airports, and multimodal transportation facilities such as the Charlotte Gateway Station. 

Station locations and transit connections will be determined in the Tier 2 EIS environmental 

review. For more information about transit planning in the Metro Atlanta area, please consult 

the Atlanta Transit Link Authority website: https://atltransit.ga.gov/. 

COST

How will this project be funded? Who will pay for it? 

The Tier 1 EIS was funded by the Atlanta-Charlotte Corridor Investment Plan via a 

Grant/Cooperative Agreement between FRA and GDOT. The grand total for the grant was 

$5.125M, with 80% ($4.1M) being contributed by FRA and $1.025M (20%) contributed by 

GDOT. The federal grant is a product of the High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) 

Program. More info on this program can be accessed via the following link 

https://cms8.fra.dot.gov/passenger-rail/high-speed-rail/high-speed-intercity-passenger-railhsipr-program

Currently, a project sponsor and funding source are unknown for a Tier 2 environmental 

review or construction of the Project. Moving forward, all three of the states in the corridor will

continue to be involved. 

How will taxes be affected by this?

The proposed Project is currently in the planning and environmental analysis stages. The 

Alternatives vary significantly in their capital and operating costs and fare revenue so selection 

of the Preferred Alternative will have varying impacts on funding requirements. A funding 

source and project sponsor have not been identified for Tier 2 environmental review or 

construction of the Project. 

Are project cost and train speed the best figures to use in an argument for/against 

choosing an option? 

Tier 1 DEIS Chapter 2 (Exhibit 2-20) and Chapter 3 (Exhibit 3-5) provide key performance 

metrics for each Corridor Alternative. Cost and speed are only two considerations for choosing 

a Preferred Alternative but speed affects travel time travel time affects ridership, and ridership 
23

affects revenue, so these are important factors. Other analysis including environmental 

impacts and public and agency comments will also considered.

What would be the cost to South Carolina? 

Project capital costs will be further evaluated in a Tier 2 environmental review. Neither a 

Project Sponsor nor funding sources have been identified as this time. High-level capital cost 

estimates can be found in the DEIS Appendix E: Alternative Development Report Section 5.9. 

The cost to Project sponsors to construct and operate the Project will continue to be defined 

as the Project progresses into more detailed analysis of environmental impacts and 

engineering, and as the operating characteristics for the service become more defined. 

Continued outreach will inform stakeholders and the public on the Project’s costs throughout 

the project development process. 

For taxpayers who will be ultimately funding the activity, what assurances can be made 

that there will be compensation for the human impact in terms of health, environment, and 

financial well-being? 

Contingent upon funding for a future Tier 2 environmental review, further environmental 

surveys and reporting will be conducted to ensure all impacts to the quality of life for the 

natural and built environments are fairly evaluated and kept as a part of the project record. 

Additionally, avoidance, minimization, and mitigation efforts will also be utilized for anticipated 

impacts to the resources along the corridor. 

Why do the Greenfield and I-85 routes have higher revenue/costs than the existing 

Southern Crescent route? 

Both the I-85 and Greenfield Corridor Alternatives have higher revenue than the Southern 

Crescent Corridor Alternative because of higher forecasted ridership. The I-85 and Greenfield 

Corridors are capable of reaching operating speeds ranging from 125 to 220 mph, resulting 

in faster trip times that attracts more riders. To reach these faster speeds, greater capital 

investment is required to construct a corridor with geometry compatible with higher speeds. 

The Southern Crescent Corridor utilizes an existing railroad right-of-way with limited 

opportunities to operate over 79 mph. The slower speed results in a longer trip time and fewer 

riders, generating less revenue for the service. However, because the Southern Crescent 

alternative utilizes an existing corridor, the alternative has fewer capital needs and a lower 

capital cost. 

It is important to note that both the I-85 and Greenfield Corridor Alternatives are projected to 

have fare revenue that is twice as high as their operating and maintenance costs. The faster 

speeds attracts more ridership, thereby generates more revenue, and lowers operating cost 

due to crews having higher productivity (i.e. traveling more miles in the course of a workday 

of a given number of hours). 
24

Is this public or private funded? What’s the basis for the project? Reduction in traffic, 

safety, time savings, or etc.? 

The Tier 1 EIS was publicly funded through the Atlanta-Charlotte Corridor Investment Plan 

(awarded in 2011), a federal discretionary grant in which the State of Georgia provided 

matching dollars. The Tier 2 environmental review or construction of the Project could be 

funded publicly, privately, or a combination of both; however, funding has not been determined 

at this time. 

Additionally, the Purpose of the Project is to improve intercity passenger travel between 

Atlanta and Charlotte by expanding the region’s transportation system capacity, and 

improving trip time and reliability through high-speed passenger rail services. The Project will 

provide transportation system capacity necessary to accommodate current and projected 

population and economic growth occurring along the SEHSR Corridor including the following

metropolitan areas in the Piedmont Atlantic Megaregion: Atlanta, Charlotte, Greenville, and 

Spartanburg. GDOT has identified eight transportation system needs relevant to the Study 

Area, each corresponding to the anticipated population and employment growth with 

increasing travel demand. The Project will satisfy the following needs: population and 

employment growth; improve regional transportation system connectivity; increase 

transportation system capacity; improve travel times and reliability; provide an alternative 

travel mode; traveler safety; improve energy efficiency and air quality; and maintain and 

enhance economic growth and vitality. The Project Purpose and Need can be referenced in 

Section 3.1 of the Tier 1 FEIS/ROD.

Would it not be cheaper to add the necessary lanes to I-85, especially if there are many 

stops for the rail line which would slow the average speed of the train? 

The Tier 1 EIS did not compare the cost of adding lanes to I-85 versus implementing rail 

service between Atlanta to Charlotte. However, in Georgia, I-85 is currently being widened 

from north of Atlanta to the South Carolina state line. Please refer to Section 3.3.4.1 (Exhibit 

3-13) of the Tier 1 DEIS Additionally, the purpose of the Tier 1 EIS was to study a different 

mobility option other than interstate highway travel. Please refer to the previous response for 

the Project’s Need and Purpose or Section 3.1 of the FEIS/ROD. Adding additional lanes to 

I-85 does not align with the Purpose and Need of this Project. 

How can we get this funded so that it's possible to get it built sooner? 

There are logical steps that need to be followed in developing a major passenger rail project 

such as this. Each step needs a project sponsor (which can change between steps). From the 

point at which this project is now, the primary remaining steps are:

1. This Tier 1 EIS process needs to be completed with issuance of the FEIS/ROD and 

publication of the ROD selecting the Preferred Alternative Corridor.

2. A Tier 2 environmental review must be conducted selecting a specific alignment within 

the corridor. This needs to include the Atlanta Approach and the Charlotte Approach; 

the corridor could be broken into separate Tier 2 environmental reviews with different 

sponsors (potentially the three states).
25

3. Right-of-way acquisition/Design

4. Construction

5. Implementation/Commissioning

A project sponsor and funding source needs to be identified for each step. Also, please refer 

to the project newsletter for general timing and a listing of next steps 

http://www.dot.ga.gov/InvestSmart/Rail/Documents/AtlChar/ATLCLT%20Newsletter_FINAL.pdf

How expensive would riding be? 

Tier 1 DEIS, Appendix B Section 5: Revenue Maximizing Analysis provides details regarding 

cost per passenger mile and provides high-level station pair fares based primarily on the 

distance between the origin and destination station, and other factors such an estimation of 

the cost to access and egress a station and a boarding fee. However, actual fares would be 

determined during future implementation and commissioning phases of the Project.