# Official Journal C 378/9 No

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 378 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 639 November 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 378

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 639 November 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2020/C 378/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice

2020/C 378/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2020/C 378/02 | Joined Cases C-674/18 and C-675/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht — Germany) — EM v TMD Friction GmbH (C-674/18), FL v TMD Friction EsCo GmbH (C-675/18) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Transfers of undertakings — Directive 2001/23/EC — Articles 3 and 5 — Safeguarding of employees’ rights — Protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer — Transfer made by the insolvency administrator of the transferring undertaking subject to insolvency proceedings — Occupational old-age pension benefits — Restriction on the obligations of the transferee — Amount of the benefit payable under the supplementary occupational pension scheme calculated on the basis of the employee’s pay when insolvency proceedings were instituted — Directive 2008/94/EC — Article 8 — Direct effect — Conditions) | 2 |
| 2020/C 378/03 | Case C-719/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Vivendi SA v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Electronic communications — Article 11(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Freedom and pluralism of the media — Freedom of establishment — Article 49 TFEU — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 15 and 16 — National legislation prohibiting an undertaking which has significant market power in a sector from establishing a ‘significant economic dimension’ in another sector — Calculation of revenues received in the electronic communications sector and the media sector — Definition of the electronic communications sector — Restriction to markets which have been subject to ex ante regulation — Account taken of the income of affiliated companies — Fixing of different income thresholds for undertakings active in the electronic communications sector) | 3 |
| 2020/C 378/04 | Case C-742/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 — Czech Republic v European Commission, Kingdom of Sweden (Appeal — European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) — Expenditure excluded from EU financing — Expenditure incurred by the Czech Republic — Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 — Articles 19 and 77 — Wine market — Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 — Article 33 — Support for rural development — Area-related aid — Decoupled direct aid — Cross-compliance checks — Traditional on-the-spot checks and on-the-spot checks by remote sensing — Burden of proof — One-off and flat-rate corrections — Doubts concerning the effectiveness of the checks — Risk analysis — Deficiencies) | 4 |
| 2020/C 378/05 | Case T-784/18 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2020 — Mellifera eV, Vereinigung für wesensgemäße Bienenhaltung v European Commission (Appeal — Aarhus Convention — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Article 2(1)(g) and Article 10(1) — Internal review of administrative acts — Limitation to measures of individual application — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1056 — Extension of the approval period of the active substance ‘glyphosate’ — Application for internal review — Measure of general application — Dismissal) | 4 |
| 2020/C 378/06 | Case C-817/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 September 2020 — Vereniging tot Behoud van Natuurmonumenten in Nederland and Others v European Commission and Others (Appeal — State aid — Aid scheme relating to the subsidised acquisition or free granting of nature land — Preliminary examination procedure — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Article 1(h) — Concept of ‘serious difficulties’ — Service of general economic interest — Secondary activities — Related actions) | 5 |
| 2020/C 378/07 | Joined Cases C-21/19 to C-23/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden — Netherlands) — Criminal proceedings against XN (C-21/19), YO (C-22/19), P.F. Kamstra Recycling BV (C-23/19) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Waste — Shipments — Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 — Waste subject to the prior written notification and consent procedure — Article 1(3) — Shipments subject to approval requirements — Directive 2008/98/EC — Article 5(1) — Concept of ‘by-products’ — Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 — Article 3, point 1 — Concept of ‘animal by-products’ — Shipments of a mixture of animal by-products and other material) | 6 |
| 2020/C 378/08 | Joined Cases C-84/19, C-222/19 and C-252/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Szczecin — Prawobrzeże i Zachód w Szczecinie, Sąd Rejonowy w Opatowie — Poland) — Profi Credit Polska SA v QJ (C-84/19), BW v DR (C-222/19), QL v CG (C-252/19) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 1(2) — Scope — National provision providing for the maximum amount of non-interest credit costs — Article 3(1) — Contractual term passing on to the consumer costs of the lender’s business activity — Significant imbalance between the rights and obligations of the parties — Article 4(2) — Obligation to draft contract terms in plain intelligible language — Contractual terms which do not specify the services for which remuneration is sought — Directive 2008/48/EC — Article 3(g) — National legislation laying down a method of calculating the maximum non-interest credit cost which may be charged to the consumer) | 7 |
| 2020/C 378/09 | Joined Cases C-119/19 P and C-126/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 September 2020 — European Commission v Francisco Carreras Sequeros and Others, European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Appeal — Civil service — Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Reform of 1 January 2014 — Article 6 of Annex X — Officials and members of the contract staff serving in a third country — New provisions on the granting of days of paid annual leave — Objection of illegality — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 31(2) — Directive 2003/88/EC — Fundamental right to paid annual leave) | 8 |
| 2020/C 378/10 | Case C-186/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Supreme Site Services GmbH, Supreme Fuels GmbH & Co KG, Supreme Fuels Trading Fze v Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 1(1) — Scope — Civil and commercial matters — Jurisdiction — Exclusive jurisdiction — Article 24(5) — Disputes concerning the enforcement of judgments — Action brought by an international organisation based on immunity from execution seeking to have an interim garnishee order lifted and a prohibition on new orders being levied on the same grounds) | 9 |
| 2020/C 378/11 | Case C-214/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 — achtung! GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(b) — Distinctive character — None) | 10 |
| 2020/C 378/12 | Case C-254/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) — Ireland) — Friends of the Irish Environment Ltd v An Bord Pleanála (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Article 6(3) — Scope — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘agreement’ — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a protected site — Decision extending the duration of a development consent for the construction of a liquefied natural gas regasification terminal — Original decision based on national legislation which did not properly transpose Directive 92/43) | 10 |
| 2020/C 378/13 | Case C-265/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) — Ireland) — Recorded Artists Actors Performers Ltd v Phonographic Performance (Ireland) Ltd, Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, Ireland, Attorney General (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Rights related to copyright — Directive 2006/115/EC — Article 8(2) — Use of phonograms in the European Union — Right of the performers to equitable remuneration shared with the phonogram producers — Applicability to nationals of third States — Performances and Phonograms Treaty — Articles 4 and 15 — Reservations notified by third States — Limitations of the right to equitable remuneration that may, on the basis of reciprocity, follow, in the European Union, for nationals of third States from those reservations — Article 17(2) and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Fundamental right to the protection of intellectual property — Requirement that any limitation must be provided for by law, respect the essence of the fundamental right and be proportionate — Division between the European Union and the Member States of competences to set those limitations — Division of competences in relations with third States — Article 3(2) TFEU — Exclusive competence of the European Union) | 11 |
| 2020/C 378/14 | Case C-356/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy w Warszawie — Poland) — Delfly sp. z o.o. v Smartwings Poland sp. z o.o., formerly Travel Service Polska sp. z o.o. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 7 — Right to compensation in the event of delay or cancellation of a flight — Compensation procedure — Claim expressed in national currency — National provision prohibiting the creditor from choosing the currency) | 12 |
| 2020/C 378/15 | Joined Cases C-503/19 and C-592/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 17 de Barcelona, Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 5 de Barcelona — Spain) — UQ (C-503/19), SI (C-592/19) v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Barcelona (References for a preliminary ruling — Status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents — Directive 2003/109/EC — Article 6(1) — Elements to be taken into consideration — National rules — Failure to take those elements into consideration — Refusal to grant long-term resident status on the ground that the person concerned has previous convictions) | 13 |
| 2020/C 378/16 | Case C-530/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — NM, acting as liquidator of NIKI Luftfahrt GmbH v ON (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Articles 5 and 9 — Obligation of the air carrier to offer hotel accommodation to passengers whose flights have been cancelled — Damage suffered by a passenger during her stay at the hotel providing the accommodation — Possibility of invoking the liability of the air carrier as a result of negligence on the part of employees of the hotel) | 13 |
| 2020/C 378/17 | Case C-539/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I — Germany) — Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV v Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Roaming on public mobile communications networks within the European Union — Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 — Article 6a — Article 6e(3) — Roaming provider required to automatically apply the regulated roaming tariff — Application to consumer having opted for a specific roaming tariff prior to the entry into force of Regulation (EU) No 531/2012) | 14 |
| 2020/C 378/18 | Case C-651/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État — Belgium) — JP v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Asylum policy — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Action brought against a subsequent application for international protection as being inadmissible — Time limit for bringing proceedings — Rules governing notification) | 15 |
| 2020/C 378/19 | Case C-273/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 22 June 2020 — Bundesrepublik Deutschland v SW | 15 |
| 2020/C 378/20 | Case C-279/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 26 June 2020 — Federal Republic of Germany v XC | 16 |
| 2020/C 378/21 | Case C-358/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Oradea (Romania) lodged on 30 July 2020 — Promexor Trade SRL v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Cluj — Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Bihor | 17 |
| 2020/C 378/22 | Case C-394/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 18 August 2020 — XY v Finanzamt V | 18 |
| 2020/C 378/23 | Case C-405/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 28 August 2020 — EB and Others v Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter, Eisenbahnen und Bergbau (BVAEB) | 19 |
| 2020/C 378/24 | Case C-412/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 3 September 2020 — European arrest warrant issued against P, Other party to the procedure: Openbaar Ministerie | 20 |
| 2020/C 378/25 | Case C-413/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 2 September 2020 — Belgian State v LO, OG, SH, MB, JD, OP, Bluetail Flight School SA (BFS) | 20 |
| 2020/C 378/26 | Case C-439/20 P: Appeal brought on 18 September 2020 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 8 July 2020 in Case T-110/17, Jiangsu Seraphim Solar System v Commission | 21 |
| 2020/C 378/27 | Case C-441/20 P: Appeal brought on 21 September 2020 by Council of the European Union against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 08 July 2020 in Case T-110/17, Jiangsu Seraphim Solar System v Commission | 22 |
| | General Court |
| 2020/C 378/28 | Case T-437/16: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Italy v Commission (Language regime — Notice of open competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of audit — Language knowledge — Limitation of the choice of second language to German, English and French — Language for communication — Regulation No 1 — Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations — Discrimination on grounds of language — Justification — Interest of the service — Proportionality) | 25 |
| 2020/C 378/29 | Case T-626/17: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Slovenia v Commission (Agriculture — Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 — Designations of origin in the wine sector — Wine labelling — Use of the name of a wine grape variety which contains or consists of a protected designation of origin — Prohibition — Derogation — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1353 — Inclusion of the name of the wine grape variety ‘teran’ in the list set out in Part A of Annex XV to Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 — Retroactive effect from the date of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union — Slovenian protected designation of origin ‘Teran’ — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Right to property — Act concerning the conditions of accession of Croatia to the European Union — Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making — Institutional balance) | 25 |
| 2020/C 378/30 | Case T-745/17: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Kerkosand v Commission (State aid — Aid for an investment project in western Slovakia — Regional investment aid — Rejection of a complaint — Decision not to raise any objections — Conditions for exemption — Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 — Scope of the Commission’s supervisory power — Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014-2020 — Concept of SME — Article 3(2) and (3) of Annex I to Regulation No 651/2014 — Data used for the staff headcount and the financial amounts and reference period — Article 4 of Annex I to Regulation No 651/2014 — Doubts as to the compatibility of the aid with the internal market — Article 4(4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Serious difficulties) | 26 |
| 2020/C 378/31 | Case T-143/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Société générale v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks entrusted to the ECB — Specific supervision powers of the ECB — Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital — Absence of individual examination) | 27 |
| 2020/C 378/32 | Cases T-150/18 and T-345/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — BNP Paribas v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee scheme or to the single resolution fund by way of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks conferred on the ECB — ECB’s specific supervision powers — Article 4(1)(f), Article 16(1)(c) and Article 16(2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure imposing the deduction of the cumulative sum of outstanding irrevocable payment commitments from Common Equity Tier 1 — Absence of individual examination) | 27 |
| 2020/C 378/33 | Case T-46/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Greece v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Area-related aid scheme — Definition of ‘permanent grasslands’ — Article 4(1)(h) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 — Integrated administration and control system — Key controls — Regulation No 1306/2013 — Duty to state reasons) | 28 |
| 2020/C 378/34 | Case T-50/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Casual Dreams v EUIPO — López Fernández (Dayaday) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Dayaday — Earlier national figurative marks DAYADAY and dayaday — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Reputation — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark) | 29 |
| 2020/C 378/35 | Case T-144/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Kludi v EUIPO — Adlon Brand (ADLON) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark ADLON — Earlier EU word mark ADLON — Proof of the reputation of the earlier mark — Rule 19 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Temporal application of the law — Late submission of documents — Board of Appeal’s discretion — Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relative ground for refusal — Damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark) | 30 |
| 2020/C 378/36 | Case T-187/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Glaxo Group Ltd v EUIPO (Shade of the colour purple) (EU trade mark — Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a shade of the colour purple — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Lack of distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) | 30 |
| 2020/C 378/37 | Case T-589/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Gothe and Kunz v EUIPO — Aldi Einkauf (FAIR ZONE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark FAIR ZONE — Earlier EU word mark FAIR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 31 |
| 2020/C 378/38 | Case T-625/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Daw v EUIPO (SOS Innenfarbe) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark SOS Innenfarbe — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001) | 31 |
| 2020/C 378/39 | Case T-669/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Novomatic v EUIPO — Brouwerij Haacht (PRIMUS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for European Union word mark PRIMUS — Earlier EU word mark PRIMUS — Earlier Benelux word mark PRIMUS — Relative ground for refusal — Damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 32 |
| 2020/C 378/40 | Case T-879/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Sumol + Compal Marcas v EUIPO — Jacob (Dr. Jacob’s essentials) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Dr. Jacob’s essentials — Earlier international word mark COMPAL ESSENCIAL — Earlier national and international figurative marks FRUTA essencial, COMPAL essencial and Compal FRUTA essencial — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 33 |
| 2020/C 378/41 | Case T-81/20: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Klose v EUIPO (Representation of three coloured segments in a rectangle) (EU trade mark — Application for an EU figurative mark representing three coloured segments in a rectangle — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 33 |
| 2020/C 378/42 | Case T-131/20: Judgment of the General Court of 2 September 2020 — IR v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Rights and obligations of officials — Secondment in the interests of the service — Article 37, first paragraph, heading (a), first indent, of the Staff Regulations — Article 38 of the Staff Regulations — Refusal to extend a secondment — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Rights of the defence) | 34 |
| 2020/C 378/43 | Case T-529/19: Order of the General Court of 10 September 2020 –ADESO v Commission (Action for annulment — Grant contracts relating to the projects ‘Your Environment is Your Life’ and ‘Social Safety Net for Poor and Vulnerable Households in Northern Regions of Somalia/Somaliland Phase II’ — Non-eligible costs — Debit notes — Confirmation letter — Challengeable act — Contractual nature of the dispute — Act not open to challenge — Act forming part of a purely contractual framework from which it is inseparable — Inadmissibility) | 34 |
| 2020/C 378/44 | Case T-645/19: Order of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — IMG v Commission (Action for annulment — Development cooperation — Implementing the EU budget in indirect management — Execution of a judgment of the Court of Justice — Commission letter requesting that certain documents be provided — Act not open to challenge — Preparatory measure — Inadmissibility — Action for damages — Close link with the claim for annulment — Lis pendens — Inadmissibility — Failure to comply with procedural requirements — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Manifest inadmissibility) | 35 |
| 2020/C 378/45 | Case T-735/19: Order of the General Court of 25 August 2020 — Frank Recruitment Group Services Ltd v EUIPO — Pearson (PEARSON FRANK) (European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to adjudicate) | 36 |
| 2020/C 378/46 | Case T-512/20: Action brought on 14 August 2020 — TrekStor v EUIPO — Zagg (Protective covers for computer hardware) | 36 |
| 2020/C 378/47 | Case T-522/20: Action brought on 11 August 2020 — Carpatair v Commission | 37 |
| 2020/C 378/48 | Case T-540/20: Action brought on 27 August 2020 — Jushi Egypt for Fiberglass Industry v Commission | 38 |
| 2020/C 378/49 | Case T-564/20: Action brought on 10 September 2020 — TrekStor v EUIPO — Zagg (Protective covers for computer hardware) | 39 |
| 2020/C 378/50 | Case T-565/20: Action brought on 10 September 2020 — TrekStor v EUIPO — Zagg (Protective covers for computer hardware) | 39 |
| 2020/C 378/51 | Case T-569/20: Action brought on 7 September 2020 — Stichting Comité N 65 Ondergronds Helvoirt v Commission | 40 |
| 2020/C 378/52 | Case T-583/20: Action brought on 23 September 2020 — Italia Wanbao-ACC v Commission | 41 |
| 2020/C 378/53 | Case T-589/20: Action brought on 24 September 2020 — Calzaturificio Emmegiemme Shoes v EUIPO — Inticom (MAIMAI MADE IN ITALY) | 43 |
| 2020/C 378/54 | Case T-593/20: Action brought on 28 September 2020 — Tirrenia di navigazione v Commission | 44 |
| 2020/C 378/55 | Case T-596/20: Action brought on 29 September 2020 — Roller v EUIPO — Flex Equipos de Descanso (DORMILLO) | 46 |
| 2020/C 378/56 | Case T-601/20: Action brought on 29 September 2020 — Tirrenia di navigazione v Commission | 46 |
| 2020/C 378/57 | Case T-53/20: Order of the General Court of 18 September 2020 — IMI 2 Joint Undertaking v CHS | 48 |
| 2020/C 378/58 | Case T-108/20: Order of the General Court of 15 September 2020 — Kahimbi Kasagwe v Council | 48 |
| 2020/C 378/59 | Case T-334/20: Order of the General Court of 8 September 2020 — KH v EEAS | 48 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2020/C 378/02

Joined Cases C-674/18 and C-675/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht — Germany) — EM v TMD Friction GmbH (C-674/18), FL v TMD Friction EsCo GmbH (C-675/18) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Transfers of undertakings — Directive 2001/23/EC — Articles 3 and 5 — Safeguarding of employees’ rights — Protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer — Transfer made by the insolvency administrator of the transferring undertaking subject to insolvency proceedings — Occupational old-age pension benefits — Restriction on the obligations of the transferee — Amount of the benefit payable under the supplementary occupational pension scheme calculated on the basis of the employee’s pay when insolvency proceedings were instituted — Directive 2008/94/EC — Article 8 — Direct effect — Conditions)

2

2020/C 378/03

Case C-719/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Vivendi SA v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Electronic communications — Article 11(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Freedom and pluralism of the media — Freedom of establishment — Article 49 TFEU — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 15 and 16 — National legislation prohibiting an undertaking which has significant market power in a sector from establishing a ‘significant economic dimension’ in another sector — Calculation of revenues received in the electronic communications sector and the media sector — Definition of the electronic communications sector — Restriction to markets which have been subject to ex ante regulation — Account taken of the income of affiliated companies — Fixing of different income thresholds for undertakings active in the electronic communications sector)

3

2020/C 378/04

Case C-742/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 — Czech Republic v European Commission, Kingdom of Sweden (Appeal — European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) — Expenditure excluded from EU financing — Expenditure incurred by the Czech Republic — Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 — Articles 19 and 77 — Wine market — Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 — Article 33 — Support for rural development — Area-related aid — Decoupled direct aid — Cross-compliance checks — Traditional on-the-spot checks and on-the-spot checks by remote sensing — Burden of proof — One-off and flat-rate corrections — Doubts concerning the effectiveness of the checks — Risk analysis — Deficiencies)

4

2020/C 378/05

Case T-784/18 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2020 — Mellifera eV, Vereinigung für wesensgemäße Bienenhaltung v European Commission (Appeal — Aarhus Convention — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Article 2(1)(g) and Article 10(1) — Internal review of administrative acts — Limitation to measures of individual application — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1056 — Extension of the approval period of the active substance ‘glyphosate’ — Application for internal review — Measure of general application — Dismissal)

4

2020/C 378/06

Case C-817/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 September 2020 — Vereniging tot Behoud van Natuurmonumenten in Nederland and Others v European Commission and Others (Appeal — State aid — Aid scheme relating to the subsidised acquisition or free granting of nature land — Preliminary examination procedure — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Article 1(h) — Concept of ‘serious difficulties’ — Service of general economic interest — Secondary activities — Related actions)

5

2020/C 378/07

Joined Cases C-21/19 to C-23/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden — Netherlands) — Criminal proceedings against XN (C-21/19), YO (C-22/19), P.F. Kamstra Recycling BV (C-23/19) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Waste — Shipments — Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 — Waste subject to the prior written notification and consent procedure — Article 1(3) — Shipments subject to approval requirements — Directive 2008/98/EC — Article 5(1) — Concept of ‘by-products’ — Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 — Article 3, point 1 — Concept of ‘animal by-products’ — Shipments of a mixture of animal by-products and other material)

6

2020/C 378/08

Joined Cases C-84/19, C-222/19 and C-252/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Szczecin — Prawobrzeże i Zachód w Szczecinie, Sąd Rejonowy w Opatowie — Poland) — Profi Credit Polska SA v QJ (C-84/19), BW v DR (C-222/19), QL v CG (C-252/19) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 1(2) — Scope — National provision providing for the maximum amount of non-interest credit costs — Article 3(1) — Contractual term passing on to the consumer costs of the lender’s business activity — Significant imbalance between the rights and obligations of the parties — Article 4(2) — Obligation to draft contract terms in plain intelligible language — Contractual terms which do not specify the services for which remuneration is sought — Directive 2008/48/EC — Article 3(g) — National legislation laying down a method of calculating the maximum non-interest credit cost which may be charged to the consumer)

7

2020/C 378/09

Joined Cases C-119/19 P and C-126/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 September 2020 — European Commission v Francisco Carreras Sequeros and Others, European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Appeal — Civil service — Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Reform of 1 January 2014 — Article 6 of Annex X — Officials and members of the contract staff serving in a third country — New provisions on the granting of days of paid annual leave — Objection of illegality — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 31(2) — Directive 2003/88/EC — Fundamental right to paid annual leave)

8

2020/C 378/10

Case C-186/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Supreme Site Services GmbH, Supreme Fuels GmbH & Co KG, Supreme Fuels Trading Fze v Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 1(1) — Scope — Civil and commercial matters — Jurisdiction — Exclusive jurisdiction — Article 24(5) — Disputes concerning the enforcement of judgments — Action brought by an international organisation based on immunity from execution seeking to have an interim garnishee order lifted and a prohibition on new orders being levied on the same grounds)

9

2020/C 378/11

Case C-214/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 — achtung! GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(b) — Distinctive character — None)

10

2020/C 378/12

Case C-254/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) — Ireland) — Friends of the Irish Environment Ltd v An Bord Pleanála (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Article 6(3) — Scope — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘agreement’ — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a protected site — Decision extending the duration of a development consent for the construction of a liquefied natural gas regasification terminal — Original decision based on national legislation which did not properly transpose Directive 92/43)

10

2020/C 378/13

Case C-265/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) — Ireland) — Recorded Artists Actors Performers Ltd v Phonographic Performance (Ireland) Ltd, Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, Ireland, Attorney General (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Rights related to copyright — Directive 2006/115/EC — Article 8(2) — Use of phonograms in the European Union — Right of the performers to equitable remuneration shared with the phonogram producers — Applicability to nationals of third States — Performances and Phonograms Treaty — Articles 4 and 15 — Reservations notified by third States — Limitations of the right to equitable remuneration that may, on the basis of reciprocity, follow, in the European Union, for nationals of third States from those reservations — Article 17(2) and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Fundamental right to the protection of intellectual property — Requirement that any limitation must be provided for by law, respect the essence of the fundamental right and be proportionate — Division between the European Union and the Member States of competences to set those limitations — Division of competences in relations with third States — Article 3(2) TFEU — Exclusive competence of the European Union)

11

2020/C 378/14

Case C-356/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy w Warszawie — Poland) — Delfly sp. z o.o. v Smartwings Poland sp. z o.o., formerly Travel Service Polska sp. z o.o. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 7 — Right to compensation in the event of delay or cancellation of a flight — Compensation procedure — Claim expressed in national currency — National provision prohibiting the creditor from choosing the currency)

12

2020/C 378/15

Joined Cases C-503/19 and C-592/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 17 de Barcelona, Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 5 de Barcelona — Spain) — UQ (C-503/19), SI (C-592/19) v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Barcelona (References for a preliminary ruling — Status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents — Directive 2003/109/EC — Article 6(1) — Elements to be taken into consideration — National rules — Failure to take those elements into consideration — Refusal to grant long-term resident status on the ground that the person concerned has previous convictions)

13

2020/C 378/16

Case C-530/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — NM, acting as liquidator of NIKI Luftfahrt GmbH v ON (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Articles 5 and 9 — Obligation of the air carrier to offer hotel accommodation to passengers whose flights have been cancelled — Damage suffered by a passenger during her stay at the hotel providing the accommodation — Possibility of invoking the liability of the air carrier as a result of negligence on the part of employees of the hotel)

13

2020/C 378/17

Case C-539/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I — Germany) — Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV v Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Roaming on public mobile communications networks within the European Union — Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 — Article 6a — Article 6e(3) — Roaming provider required to automatically apply the regulated roaming tariff — Application to consumer having opted for a specific roaming tariff prior to the entry into force of Regulation (EU) No 531/2012)

14

2020/C 378/18

Case C-651/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État — Belgium) — JP v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Asylum policy — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Action brought against a subsequent application for international protection as being inadmissible — Time limit for bringing proceedings — Rules governing notification)

15

2020/C 378/19

Case C-273/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 22 June 2020 — Bundesrepublik Deutschland v SW

15

2020/C 378/20

Case C-279/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 26 June 2020 — Federal Republic of Germany v XC

16

2020/C 378/21

Case C-358/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Oradea (Romania) lodged on 30 July 2020 — Promexor Trade SRL v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Cluj — Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Bihor

17

2020/C 378/22

Case C-394/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 18 August 2020 — XY v Finanzamt V

18

2020/C 378/23

Case C-405/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 28 August 2020 — EB and Others v Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter, Eisenbahnen und Bergbau (BVAEB)

19

2020/C 378/24

Case C-412/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 3 September 2020 — European arrest warrant issued against P, Other party to the procedure: Openbaar Ministerie

20

2020/C 378/25

Case C-413/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 2 September 2020 — Belgian State v LO, OG, SH, MB, JD, OP, Bluetail Flight School SA (BFS)

20

2020/C 378/26

Case C-439/20 P: Appeal brought on 18 September 2020 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 8 July 2020 in Case T-110/17, Jiangsu Seraphim Solar System v Commission

21

2020/C 378/27

Case C-441/20 P: Appeal brought on 21 September 2020 by Council of the European Union against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 08 July 2020 in Case T-110/17, Jiangsu Seraphim Solar System v Commission

22

General Court

2020/C 378/28

Case T-437/16: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Italy v Commission (Language regime — Notice of open competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of audit — Language knowledge — Limitation of the choice of second language to German, English and French — Language for communication — Regulation No 1 — Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations — Discrimination on grounds of language — Justification — Interest of the service — Proportionality)

25

2020/C 378/29

Case T-626/17: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Slovenia v Commission (Agriculture — Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 — Designations of origin in the wine sector — Wine labelling — Use of the name of a wine grape variety which contains or consists of a protected designation of origin — Prohibition — Derogation — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1353 — Inclusion of the name of the wine grape variety ‘teran’ in the list set out in Part A of Annex XV to Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 — Retroactive effect from the date of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union — Slovenian protected designation of origin ‘Teran’ — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Right to property — Act concerning the conditions of accession of Croatia to the European Union — Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making — Institutional balance)

25

2020/C 378/30

Case T-745/17: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Kerkosand v Commission (State aid — Aid for an investment project in western Slovakia — Regional investment aid — Rejection of a complaint — Decision not to raise any objections — Conditions for exemption — Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 — Scope of the Commission’s supervisory power — Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014-2020 — Concept of SME — Article 3(2) and (3) of Annex I to Regulation No 651/2014 — Data used for the staff headcount and the financial amounts and reference period — Article 4 of Annex I to Regulation No 651/2014 — Doubts as to the compatibility of the aid with the internal market — Article 4(4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Serious difficulties)

26

2020/C 378/31

Case T-143/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Société générale v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks entrusted to the ECB — Specific supervision powers of the ECB — Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital — Absence of individual examination)

27

2020/C 378/32

Cases T-150/18 and T-345/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — BNP Paribas v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee scheme or to the single resolution fund by way of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks conferred on the ECB — ECB’s specific supervision powers — Article 4(1)(f), Article 16(1)(c) and Article 16(2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure imposing the deduction of the cumulative sum of outstanding irrevocable payment commitments from Common Equity Tier 1 — Absence of individual examination)

27

2020/C 378/33

Case T-46/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Greece v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Area-related aid scheme — Definition of ‘permanent grasslands’ — Article 4(1)(h) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 — Integrated administration and control system — Key controls — Regulation No 1306/2013 — Duty to state reasons)

28

2020/C 378/34

Case T-50/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Casual Dreams v EUIPO — López Fernández (Dayaday) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Dayaday — Earlier national figurative marks DAYADAY and dayaday — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Reputation — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark)

29

2020/C 378/35

Case T-144/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Kludi v EUIPO — Adlon Brand (ADLON) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark ADLON — Earlier EU word mark ADLON — Proof of the reputation of the earlier mark — Rule 19 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Temporal application of the law — Late submission of documents — Board of Appeal’s discretion — Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relative ground for refusal — Damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark)

30

2020/C 378/36

Case T-187/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Glaxo Group Ltd v EUIPO (Shade of the colour purple) (EU trade mark — Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a shade of the colour purple — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Lack of distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001)

30

2020/C 378/37

Case T-589/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Gothe and Kunz v EUIPO — Aldi Einkauf (FAIR ZONE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark FAIR ZONE — Earlier EU word mark FAIR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

31

2020/C 378/38

Case T-625/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Daw v EUIPO (SOS Innenfarbe) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark SOS Innenfarbe — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001)

31

2020/C 378/39

Case T-669/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Novomatic v EUIPO — Brouwerij Haacht (PRIMUS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for European Union word mark PRIMUS — Earlier EU word mark PRIMUS — Earlier Benelux word mark PRIMUS — Relative ground for refusal — Damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

32

2020/C 378/40

Case T-879/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Sumol + Compal Marcas v EUIPO — Jacob (Dr. Jacob’s essentials) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Dr. Jacob’s essentials — Earlier international word mark COMPAL ESSENCIAL — Earlier national and international figurative marks FRUTA essencial, COMPAL essencial and Compal FRUTA essencial — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

33

2020/C 378/41

Case T-81/20: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Klose v EUIPO (Representation of three coloured segments in a rectangle) (EU trade mark — Application for an EU figurative mark representing three coloured segments in a rectangle — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

33

2020/C 378/42

Case T-131/20: Judgment of the General Court of 2 September 2020 — IR v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Rights and obligations of officials — Secondment in the interests of the service — Article 37, first paragraph, heading (a), first indent, of the Staff Regulations — Article 38 of the Staff Regulations — Refusal to extend a secondment — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Rights of the defence)

34

2020/C 378/43

Case T-529/19: Order of the General Court of 10 September 2020 –ADESO v Commission (Action for annulment — Grant contracts relating to the projects ‘Your Environment is Your Life’ and ‘Social Safety Net for Poor and Vulnerable Households in Northern Regions of Somalia/Somaliland Phase II’ — Non-eligible costs — Debit notes — Confirmation letter — Challengeable act — Contractual nature of the dispute — Act not open to challenge — Act forming part of a purely contractual framework from which it is inseparable — Inadmissibility)

34

2020/C 378/44

Case T-645/19: Order of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — IMG v Commission (Action for annulment — Development cooperation — Implementing the EU budget in indirect management — Execution of a judgment of the Court of Justice — Commission letter requesting that certain documents be provided — Act not open to challenge — Preparatory measure — Inadmissibility — Action for damages — Close link with the claim for annulment — Lis pendens — Inadmissibility — Failure to comply with procedural requirements — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Manifest inadmissibility)

35

2020/C 378/45

Case T-735/19: Order of the General Court of 25 August 2020 — Frank Recruitment Group Services Ltd v EUIPO — Pearson (PEARSON FRANK) (European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to adjudicate)

36

2020/C 378/46

Case T-512/20: Action brought on 14 August 2020 — TrekStor v EUIPO — Zagg (Protective covers for computer hardware)

36

2020/C 378/47

Case T-522/20: Action brought on 11 August 2020 — Carpatair v Commission

37

2020/C 378/48

Case T-540/20: Action brought on 27 August 2020 — Jushi Egypt for Fiberglass Industry v Commission

38

2020/C 378/49

Case T-564/20: Action brought on 10 September 2020 — TrekStor v EUIPO — Zagg (Protective covers for computer hardware)

39

2020/C 378/50

Case T-565/20: Action brought on 10 September 2020 — TrekStor v EUIPO — Zagg (Protective covers for computer hardware)

39

2020/C 378/51

Case T-569/20: Action brought on 7 September 2020 — Stichting Comité N 65 Ondergronds Helvoirt v Commission

40

2020/C 378/52

Case T-583/20: Action brought on 23 September 2020 — Italia Wanbao-ACC v Commission

41

2020/C 378/53

Case T-589/20: Action brought on 24 September 2020 — Calzaturificio Emmegiemme Shoes v EUIPO — Inticom (MAIMAI MADE IN ITALY)

43

2020/C 378/54

Case T-593/20: Action brought on 28 September 2020 — Tirrenia di navigazione v Commission

44

2020/C 378/55

Case T-596/20: Action brought on 29 September 2020 — Roller v EUIPO — Flex Equipos de Descanso (DORMILLO)

46

2020/C 378/56

Case T-601/20: Action brought on 29 September 2020 — Tirrenia di navigazione v Commission

46

2020/C 378/57

Case T-53/20: Order of the General Court of 18 September 2020 — IMI 2 Joint Undertaking v CHS

48

2020/C 378/58

Case T-108/20: Order of the General Court of 15 September 2020 — Kahimbi Kasagwe v Council

48

2020/C 378/59

Case T-334/20: Order of the General Court of 8 September 2020 — KH v EEAS

48

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN