alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Bleiberg Entertainment, LLC,

Plaintiff

 v.

John Does 1-16,

Defendants

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action 2:13-cv-00040

Judge Sargus

Magistrate Judge Abel

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s January 15, 2013 Ex Parte Motion for

Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference to take limited, immediate

discovery, which was supported by the Declaration of Darren M. Griffin (doc. 3). For

good cause shown, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED.

It is ORDERED that Plaintiff Bleiberg Entertainment, LLC may serve limited,

immediate discovery on the internet service providers (“ISPs”) identified in Exhibit 1 to

the Declaration of Darren M. Griffin and on any later-discovered unknown or

intermediary ISPs to obtain the identity of each Doe Defendant or other identified

alleged infringers by serving a Rule 45 subpoena that seeks documents that identify

each Doe defendant, including the name, addresses, telephone numbers, email

addresses, and Media Access Control addresses for each alleged infringer. The

1

Case: 2:13-cv-00040-EAS-MRA Doc #: 5 Filed: 01/17/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
disclosure of this information is ordered pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1232g(b)(2)(B) where

applicable to educational institutions.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT any information that is disclosed to Plaintiff

in response to the Rule 45 subpoenas may be used by Plaintiff solely for the purpose of

protecting Plaintiff’s rights under the Copyright Act.

s/Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge

2

Case: 2:13-cv-00040-EAS-MRA Doc #: 5 Filed: 01/17/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2019054EN.01000301.xml

| 11.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/3

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 November 2018 — Toontrack Music AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

(Case C-48/18 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - European Union trade mark - Application for registration of the word mark EZMIX - Rejection of the application - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) - Articles 65, 75 and 76 - Descriptive character - Perception of the relevant public - Right to a hearing - Principle of examination by EUIPO of its own motion - Obligation to state reasons - Distortion - Evidence presented for the first time before the General Court))

(2019/C 54/03)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Appellant: Toontrack Music AB (represented by: L.-E. Ström, advokat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | Toontrack Music AB shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Toontrack Music AB shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                             TRANS-INDUSTRIES, INC.

                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trans-Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kai
Kosanke, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Kai Kosanke
--------------------------------
Name: Kai Kosanke
Title: Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 12, 2004

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Paragraph 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 64308.

protests 185217-K and 58/13352 (New York).

#### Charles Hall, Inc., and Steelmasters, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Official Journal L 185/24 M

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 185 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4724 May 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 185

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4724 May 2004

---

| Contents | | Corrigenda | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 811/2004 of 21 April 2004 establishing measures for the recovery of the northern hake stock
  (OJ L 150, 30.4.2004) | 1 |
| | * | Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 812/2004 of 26 April 2004 laying down measures concerning incidental catches of cetaceans in fisheries and amending Regulation (EC) No 88/98
  (OJ L 150, 30.4.2004) | 4 |
| | * | Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 813/2004 of 26 April 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1626/94 as regards certain conservation measures relating to waters around Malta
  (OJ L 150, 30.4.2004) | 13 |
| | * | Corrigendum to Council Decision 2004/425/EC of 21 April 2004 on the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on the mutual recognition of certificates of conformity for marine equipment
  (OJ L 150, 30.4.2004) | 18 |

Contents

Corrigenda

page

*

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 811/2004 of 21 April 2004 establishing measures for the recovery of the northern hake stock
  (OJ L 150, 30.4.2004)

(OJ L 150, 30.4.2004)

1

*

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 812/2004 of 26 April 2004 laying down measures concerning incidental catches of cetaceans in fisheries and amending Regulation (EC) No 88/98
  (OJ L 150, 30.4.2004)

(OJ L 150, 30.4.2004)

4

*

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 813/2004 of 26 April 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1626/94 as regards certain conservation measures relating to waters around Malta
  (OJ L 150, 30.4.2004)

(OJ L 150, 30.4.2004)

13

*

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2004/425/EC of 21 April 2004 on the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on the mutual recognition of certificates of conformity for marine equipment
  (OJ L 150, 30.4.2004)

(OJ L 150, 30.4.2004)

18

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
No. 55428.

#### Air Express Int’l. Agency, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 167151-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.:
(Reap. Dec. 9767)

#### Westro, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. WHB 99280; WHB 100769.

*462(Decided August 10, 1960)

*Sharretts, Paley<& Garter*for tlie plaintiff.

*George Oochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted these two appeals for reappraisement for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the issues of fact and questions of law involved in the above named appeals for reappraisement are the same in all material respects as those in *Westro, Inc.*v. *United States,*43 Cust. Ct. 497, Reap. Dec. 9516.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there is no foreign or export value as those terms are defined in sections 402 (c) or (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended for such or similar merchandise and that the price at which such or similar imported merchandise was freely offered for sale for domestic consumption, packed ready for delivery, in the principal market of the United States to all purchasers, at the times of exportation of the merchandise covered by the above named appeals, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, with allowance made for duty, cost of transportation and insurance, and other necessary expenses from the place of shipment to the place of delivery, profits not to exceed 8 per centum and a reasonable allowance for general expenses, not to exceed 8 per centum was $0.1857 each net packed for the merchandise covered by reappraisement 244027-A and $0.1791 each net packed for the mei-chandise the subject of reappraisement 244028-A.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the record in Reap. Dec. 9516 be incorporated with the record in these cases and that these appeals for reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

Oil the agreed facts and following the cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the articles in question is United States value, as defined in section 402(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and hold that such statutory value for the merchandise covered by reappraisement 244027-A is $0.1857 each, net packed, and for the merchandise covered by reappraisement 244028-A is $0.1791 each, net packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
----

Action brought on 4 June 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-235/04)

(2004/C 201/21)

An action against the Kingdom of Spain was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 4 June 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by D.M. van Beek and Gregorio Valero Jordana, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

Article 4(1) and (2) of Directive 79/409/EC places on Members States an obligation to classify territories as special protection areas for the conservation of birds, to ensure effective protection of the species listed in Annex I to that directive and of regularly occurring migratory species, in order to guarantee their survival and reproduction in their area of distribution. That obligation relates, as a minimum, to all the most suitable territories, as regards their number and size, for the conservation of the species concerned, having regard to their protection requirements. What constitutes a sufficient number of special protection areas is determined by reference to the objective pursued.

The Member Stakes enjoy a degree of latitude in determining which territories best meet the requirements listed in Article 4 of the directive, but they must base their evaluations solely on scientific ornithological criteria. In the case of Spain, the inventory of important bird areas (IBA) drawn up by the Sociedad Española de Ornitología (Spanish Ornithological Society) in 1998 (SEO/Birdlife Inventory 98) constitutes the best documented and most accurate basis available for defining the most suitable territories for conservation and, in particular, for the survival and reproduction of important species. That inventory is based on balanced ornithological criteria, making it possible to indicate which places are most suitable for guaranteeing conservation of all the species mentioned in Annex 1 and other migratory species, and identifies the priority areas for the conservation of birds in Spain.

From a comparison of the data of the SEO/Birdlife Inventory 98 with the special protection areas designated by the Kingdom of Spain, for Spanish territory as a whole, and from a more detailed analysis by the Autonomous Communities, it can be inferred that the number and size of the areas classified as special protection areas fall short of what scientific evidence indicates as the areas most suitable for providing adequate protection of the birds covered by Article 4 of the directive.

----

(1)OJ L 103 of 25.4.1979, p. 1.

----
June 12, 1972

No. 72-17

#### Raymond J. Stanten (Formerly Stankevicius), MAJ, U. S. Army v United States.

On consideration of petitioner’s “Petition for Reconsideration of Dismissal of Appellant’s Petition for Reconsideration or Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis or Other Extraordinary Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (a) ” filed in the above-entitled action, it is, by the Court, this 12th day of June 1972,

ORDERED:

That said Petition for Reconsideration be, and the same is, hereby denied.

(Petition for Reconsideration or Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis or Other Extraordinary Relief Pursuant to 28 USC § 1651 (a) dismissed in Memorandum Opinion and Order on June 1, 1972. 21 USCMA 431, 45 CMR 205).
Case: 2:12-cv-01186-EAS-EPD Doc #: 55 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T17:53:08-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case No. COMP/M.3090 - VOLKSWAGEN / Offset / Crescent / Lease Plan / JV)

(2004/C 145/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1

----
#### Gimbel Bros., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7572.

Entry No. 728897.

Pro forma invoice dated London, England, April 1943.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 26, 1943.

(Decided March 30, 1948)

*Fred Bennett*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the entered values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Case: 2:13-cv-00007-EAS-NMK Doc #: 25 Filed: 04/09/14 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T10:07:28-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

Jeffery A. Johnson, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Muskingum Co. Sheriff's 

Dept., et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:13-cv-25 

Judge Michael H. Watson 

OPINION AND ORDER 

On May 13, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge King issued a Report 

and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending the Court grant Defendant 

Muskingum County Defendants' motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 68. 

ECF No. 78. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, objects. ECF No. 82. 

As an initial matter, Plaintiff includes in his objection a motion to amend his 

Complaint, but the Magistrate Judge has already denied the request as untimely 

and without merit. Opinion and Order 4-5, ECF No. 84. 

Plaintiff's remaining substantive objection is as follows: 

Defendants have failed to deny the 351bs weight loss suffered by 

Plaintiff. Or the pain and suffering inflicted on him by his inability to 

swallow food and their deliberate indifference. Nor the reason his 

150 times he actively sought medical attention and treatment. The 

bleeding and swelling of his throat, without giving consideration to 

Boerhaaue's Syndrome, Defendants were well aware of Plaintiff's 

condition and injuries, but denied personally proper and complete 

medical care. A scheduled CAT scan would have shown damage to 

the soft tissue of the throat. 

Case: 2:13-cv-00025-MHW-NMK Doc #: 86 Filed: 09/17/14 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Objection 2, ECF No. 82. (emphasis in original). 

Plaintiff appears to be objecting to the Magistrate Judge's finding that 

Plaintiff failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact as to the existence of a 

serious medical need and Defendants' deliberate indifference to that need. 

However, Plaintiff does not offer any evidence to substantiate his assertions. As 

the Magistrate Judge noted, "Plaintiff's prose status does not relieve him of this 

obligation." R&R 8, ECF No. 78 (citing cases). Accordingly, Plaintiff has not 

demonstrated that the Magistrate Judge erred in finding that Defendants' were 

not deliberately indifferent to a serious medical need. 

For the foregoing reasons, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiff's objections 

and ADOPTS the R&R. The Clerk shall remove ECF No. 78 from The Civil 

Justice Reform Act Motions Report. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

NnCHAEL 

~-it!~ H. WATSON, JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

Case: 2:13-cv-00025-MHW-NMK Doc #: 86 Filed: 09/17/14 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2007155EN.01001602.xml

| 7.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/16

---

Action brought on 10 May 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-234/07)

(2007/C 155/31)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Shotter and G. Braga da Cruz, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | a declaration that, by failing to ensure in practice, to the extent technically feasible, that information on the location of callers, for all calls made to the European emergency number 112, is made available to the authorities responsible for handling emergencies, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 26 (3) of Directive 2002/22/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive); |
| --- | --- |

—

a declaration that, by failing to ensure in practice, to the extent technically feasible, that information on the location of callers, for all calls made to the European emergency number 112, is made available to the authorities responsible for handling emergencies, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 26 (3) of Directive 2002/22/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive);

1

| — | an order that the Portuguese Republic should pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

an order that the Portuguese Republic should pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposition of the directive into domestic law expired on 24 July 2004.

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 108, p. 51.

1

---
# CA2008297EN.01S00301.xml

| 20.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 297/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 297/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided to no longer quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
No. 62043.

#### L. H. Graves et al. *v.*United States,

protests 253593-K, etc. (Laredo).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 73 (Tuesday, April 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7273]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5777]


Determination and Waiver of Section 517(a) of the Foreign 
Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act 
(2006) (Pub. L. 109-102), as Carried Forward Under the Revised 
Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Pub. L. 110-5), Relating to 
Assistance for the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union

    Pursuant to the authority vested in me as Deputy Secretary of 
State, including by Section 517(a) of the Foreign Operations, Export 
Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act (2006) (Pub. L. 109-
102), as Carried Forward Under the Revised Continuing Appropriations 
Resolution, 2007 (Pub. L. 110-5), Executive Order 13118 of March 31, 
1999, and State Department Delegation of Authority No. 245 of April 23, 
2001, I hereby determine that it is in the national security interest 
of the United States to make available funds appropriated under the 
heading ``Assistance for the Independent States of the Former Soviet 
Union'' in Title II of the FOAA, as carried forward under the CR, 
without regard to the restriction in that section.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress promptly and 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: April 4, 2007.
John D. Negroponte,
Deputy Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E7-7273 Filed 4-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-23-P