alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-61,069; TA-W-61,069A; TA-W-61,069B] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on March 6, 2007 in response to a petition filed by the Trade Program Manager, Division of Career Service of Boston, Massachusetts on behalf of workers at Quaker Fabric Corporation of Fall River, Plant A/B-700, Fall River, Massachusetts, (TA-W-61,069), Plant C-710, Fall River, Massachusetts (TA-W-61,069A) and Plant J-720, Fall River, Massachusetts (TA-W-61,069B). 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 12th day of April 2007. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7-7620 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Document

Exhibit 10.1

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
SWITCH, INC.
2017 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN


This First Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Switch, Inc. 2017 Incentive Award Plan (as may be amended from time to time, the “Plan”) is made as of April 11, 2022 (the “Effective Date”). Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Plan.


WHEREAS, the Plan was adopted in 2017 to enhance the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate persons who make (or are expected to make) important contributions to the Company by providing these individuals with equity ownership opportunities;


WHEREAS, Section 9(i) of the Plan permits the Administrator to reprice Options and Stock Appreciation Rights;


WHEREAS, the Administrator desires to amend the Plan to expressly prohibit repricing of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights unless stockholder approval is obtained; and


WHEREAS, Section 10(d) of the Plan permits the Administrator to amend the Plan from time to time, subject only to certain limitations specified therein.


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of the Effective Date:


1.The first sentence of Section 9(i) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


(i) Repricing. Subject to Section 8, the Administrator shall not, without the approval of the stockholders of the Company in accordance with the Company’s charter and bylaws, (i) authorize the amendment of any outstanding Option or Stock Appreciation Right to reduce its price per share, or (ii) cancel any Option or Stock Appreciation Right in exchange for cash or another Award when the Option or Stock Appreciation Right price per share exceeds the Fair Market Value of the underlying Shares.


* * *
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 255 

Recognizing the achievements of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service 

and the Waterfowl Population Survey. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2005 

Mrs. LINCOLN (for herself and Mr. COCHRAN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

OCTOBER 26, 2005 

Reported by Mr. INHOFE, without amendment 

OCTOBER 31, 2005 

Considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the achievements of the United States Fish and 

Wildlife Service and the Waterfowl Population Survey. 

Whereas every spring and summer teams of United States 

Fish and Wildlife Service pilot-biologists take to the skies 

to survey North America’s waterfowl breeding grounds 

flying more than 80,000 miles a year, crisscrossing the 

country just above the treetops and open fields, they and 

observers on the ground record the number of ducks, 

geese, and swans and assess the quality and quantity of 

water-fowl breeding habitats; 
2 

SRES 255 ATS 

Whereas the pilot biologists operate from the wide open bays 

and wetlands of the eastern shores of North America to 

some of the most remote regions of Canada and Alaska, 

and are documenting an important part of our wildlife 

heritage; 

Whereas the Waterfowl Population Survey, operated by the 

United States Fish and Wildlife Service, is celebrating its 

50th anniversary in 2005, is featured on the 2005–2006 

Duck Stamp, and has been recognized by the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation for its contribution to waterfowl hunting; 

Whereas the Waterfowl Population Survey Program has 

evolved into the largest and most reliable wildlife survey 

effort in the world; 

Whereas for more than 50 years cooperative waterfowl surveys have been performed by the United States Fish and 

Wildlife Service, the Canadian Wildlife Service, State and 

provincial biologists, and nongovernmental partners; and 

Whereas survey results determine the status of North America’s waterfowl populations, play an important role in setting annual waterfowl hunting regulations, and help 

guide the decisions of waterfowl managers throughout 

North America: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the achievements and contribu3 tions of the Waterfowl Population Survey Program; 

4 (2) expresses strong support for the continued 

5 success of the Waterfowl Population Survey Pro6 gram; 
3 

SRES 255 ATS 

1 (3) encourages the United States Fish and 

2 Wildlife Service in its efforts to broaden under3 standing and public participation in the Waterfowl 

4 Population Survey Program by increasing partner5 ships to continue growth and development of the 

6 Survey; and 

7 (4) reaffirms its commitment to the Waterfowl 

8 Population Survey Program and the conservation of 

9 the rich natural heritage of the United States. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trinity Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James E. Perry, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company, as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.




/s/ James E. Perry


James E. Perry


Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


August 1, 2013


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7828]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) will submit to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).
    Title: Application for NATO International Competitive Bidding.
    Agency Form Number: BIS-4023P.
    OMB Approval Number: 0694-0128.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden: 40 hours.
    Average Time Per Response: 1 hour.
    Number of Respondents: 40.
    Needs and Uses: All U.S. firms desiring to participate in the NATO 
International Competitive Bidding (ICB) process under the NATO Security 
Investment Program (NSIP) must be certified as technically, financially 
and professionally competent. The U.S. Department of Commerce is the 
agency that provides the Statement of Eligibility that certifies these 
firms. Any such firm seeking certification is required to submit a 
completed Form BIS-4023P along with a current annual financial report 
and a r[eacute]sum[eacute] of past projects in order to become 
certified and placed on the Consolidated List of Eligible Bidders. The 
information provided on the form is used to certify the U.S. firm for 
placement on the bidders' list database.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households, business or other for-
profit organizations.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to retain or obtain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, e-mail address, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#024663746b665d506d7176696770426d6f602c676d722c656d74"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d296b3a4bbb68d80bda1a6b9b7a092bdbfb0fcb7bda2fcb5bda4">[email protected]</span></a>, or Fax number, (202) 395-7285.

    Dated: April 19, 2007.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-7828 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Three Months Ended
                                                            March 31,
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                   1997                1996
<S>                                                <C>                   <C>    
Net Income ($000)                                  $9,618                $58,503


Weighted Average Common
  Shares Outstanding                           69,240,938             69,108,949


Earnings Per Share                                  $0.14                  $0.85


Weighted Average Common
  Shares Outstanding
  Including Common Stock
  Equivalents - Primary Basis                  69,531,790             69,507,429


Primary Earnings Per Share                          $0.14                  $0.84


Weighted Average Common
  Shares Outstanding
  Including Common Stock
  Equivalents - Fully
  Diluted Basis                                69,531,790             69,542,427


Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share                    $0.14                  $0.84
</TABLE>



<PAGE>
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 52005AP0195

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 74/408/EEC relating to motor vehicles with regard to the seats, their anchorages and head restraints (11935/3/2004 - C6-0031/2005 - 2003/0128(COD))***Official Journal 117 E , 18/05/2006 P. 0134 - 0139*

P6_TA(2005)0195

Seats and head restraints in motor vehicles ***II

European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 74/408/EEC relating to motor vehicles with regard to the seats, their anchorages and head restraints (11935/3/2004 — C6-0031/2005 — 2003/0128(COD))

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Council common position (11935/3/2004 — C6-0031/2005) [1],

- having regard to its position at first reading [2] on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2003)0361),

- having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0115/2005),

1. Approves the common position as amended;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] OJ C 111 E, 11.5.2005, p. 33.

[2] OJ C 91 E, 15.4.2004, p. 487.

--------------------------------------------------
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2010-4 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based upon my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

-vsWilliam R. Clay

________________________________

Case No. 2:13-cr-171

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to

Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P. and has entered a plea of guilty to Count one of

the Indictment. After examining the Defendant under oath concerning

each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determine that the

defendant is competent and capable of entering an informed plea, that

the guilty plea is knowingly and voluntary made and that the offenses

charged are supported by an independent basis in fact containing each

of the essential elements of such offense. 

 I therefore RECOMMEND the plea agreement and the plea of

guilty should be accepted and the Defendant should be adjudged guilty

and sentenced accordingly. Otherwise, the plea agreement should be

rejected and the defendant should be allowed to withdraw the guilty

plea. 

The Defendant remains in the custody of the U.S. Marshal pending

sentencing. 

Date: October 11, 2013 /s/ Terence P. Kemp 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and

Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service

shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and

Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28

U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B).

Case: 2:13-cr-00171-GCS Doc #: 31 Filed: 10/11/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:13-cr-00171-GCS Doc #: 31 Filed: 10/11/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
### NUMBER 13
- 1 4
- 00 593
- CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ AGUA SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT , A ppellant ,

v.
BASILISA PEREZ GONZA LEZ, ROSALVA SOSA, RAQUEL G. CHATRIWALA , ROGELIO GONZALES, ROLANDO GONZALEZ, RE BECCA G. RAMIREZ, RAMON GONZALEZ III, ROEL GONZALEZ, RICARDO GONZALEZ AND HEIRS AND UNKNOWN HE IRS, ASSIGNS OR DEVISEES OF RAMON GONZALEZ , A ppellees

.

__ __________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 8

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No.

8 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CCD

- 0125

- H . Appellant has filed a n2

amended motion to dismiss t he appeal on grounds it no longer wishes to pursue the appeal

. The certificate of conference reflects that appellant was unable to confer with appellees because appellant does not have a valid phone number or electronic mail
address or facsimile number fo r appellees. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant ’ s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). Appellant ’ s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is he reby
DISMISSED. There being no agreement in the motion regarding costs, pursuant to Rule 42.1(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all costs are taxed against appellant.
See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

D elivered a nd filed the 12th day of February , 20 15

.
September 2010

Economic Impact Analysis for 

Corporate Parent and NAICS 

Reporting Amendment to MRR 

Report for Final Rule

CONTENTS

Section 1 Introduction and Background

1-1

Section 2 Summary of the FINAL Ammendment

2-1

2.1 Definition of Affected Entities

2-1

2.2 Rationale for Collecting Information on Parent Company(s), NAICS 

code(s) and Cogeneration

2-6

Section 3 FACILITY- and Supplier-LEVEL Cost Analysis

3-1

3.1 Estimating the Loaded Hourly Wage Rates
3-1

3.2 Estimating Facility and Supplier Reporting Burden

3-2

3.2.1 U.S. Parent Company Name, Address, and Percent Ownership

3-2

3.2.2 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code(s) 

and Cogeneration

3-4

3.2.3 Summary of Burden Esitmate Per Facility

3-6

Section 4 Economic Analysis

4-1

4.1 National Cost Estimates

4-1

4.1.1 National Cost Estimate

4-2

4.2 Small Entity Analysis

4-4

4.3 Synopsis of Benefits

4-4

Section 5 Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

5-1
5.1 Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review

5-1

5.2 Paperwork Reduction Act

5-1

5.3 Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

5-3

5.4 Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

5-4

5.5 Executive Order 13132: Federalism

5-5

5.6 Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments

5-5

5.7 Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks

5-6

5.8 Executive Order 13211: Actions that Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use

5-6

5.9 National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

5-6

5.10 Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice 

in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

5-6

5.11 Congressional Review Act
5-7
LIST OF TABLES

Table 21.Examples of Regulated Entities by Category 2-2

Table 31 Loaded Hourly Wage Rates by Labor Category 3-1

Table 32. Summary of Burden Estimate Per Facility For Parent Company Name(s), Address(es), 

and Percent Ownership. 3-4

Table 33. Summary of Burden Estimate for NAICS and Cogeneration Per Facility 3-5

Table 34. Summary of Burden Estimate Per Facility 3-6

Table 41. Number of Facilities and Suppliers Required to Report GHG Emissions by Industry 

Sector 4-2

Table 43. National Burden and Costs to Reporters by Data Element and Reporting Year 4-4

Table 51. Cost Summary for Final Rulemaking 5-1
# C_2008283EN.01001201.xml

| 7.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/12

---

Call for proposals for the ESPON 2013 Operational Programme

(2008/C 283/06)

In the framework of the ESPON 2013 Programme, a call for tender was opened. Please visit: www.espon.eu regularly for further information.

---