alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 121I/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 121I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6516 March 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 121I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6516 March 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2022/C 121 I/01 | Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/429, and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/427 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 1 |
| 2022/C 121 I/02 | Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine apply | 3 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2022/C 121 I/01

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/429, and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/427 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

1

2022/C 121 I/02

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine apply

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 32.3


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Angela
D. Toppi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Trans-Lux
Corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge
that:

    (1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2004 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

    This Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not
be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the
certifying officer.



                                       /s/ Angela D. Toppi
                                       -----------------------------------
Date:  May 13, 2004                    Executive Vice President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       Angela D. Toppi
BEAUFORT SEA

BATHYMETRIC MAP DEMARCATION POINT 4

3g0000m.£,

T7g0000m.N

1776 0000m.N)

<=
&
&
¢
8
S
%
S
&
}
|
I
|
\
|
| 5
= zg
| |
| | | . | age
390000. | - i i i i i i gnats 741°
Base map information including bathymetry was compiled by the National j
Ocean Service (NOS). Bathymetry was compiled from NOS hydrographic OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOU RCE MANAGEMENT MAP NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE DEMARCATION POI! NT |
surveys supplemented by hydrographic information from other sources (see . HYDROGRAPIC SURVEY INDEX ‘
index). NOS hydrographic survey data complies with International Hydro- UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 70 commen =¥ Speen 70° NOS NR 7-5 (OCS) ‘
arophie Organization (IHO) Publication 44 accuracy stondards or those NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION Oats He gp3 Soa |
used at the date of the surveys. This is a reproduction of a facsimile of the H-7980°—— {
bathymetric manuscript and does not necessarily represent the final pub- . NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE :
lication. This information is not intended for navigational purposes. 1986 ° .
Bathymetric Contour Intervals: 10 meters to maximum depth, supplemented
by 2 meter intervals. Produced at Washington, D.C. NDEX TO : /
Datum: Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW). for H-7982 7 }4Z_ADOINING SHEETS 138°
is ADJO ° '

Universal Transverse Mercator Grid. Zone 7; 10,000 meter ticks (—) are

- . MACKENZIE |
shown inside the neatline. ‘CANYON

Flaxman | BARTER {
ISLAND. SLAND NORTH, :
NR 7-4

Si
NR 6-8

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Protraction Diagram dota shown in a subdued (screened) black was com-

piled by the Minerals Management Service (MMS). : » MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE 4 |
° H . > EMAR! JACKENZIE,
THIS MAP IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal leasing purposes; for . ‘ P rou, “casvon \
such purposes use the MMS Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction ‘ ‘
Diagrams . ‘ ‘ . ;
9 . TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION
Heavy line(s} indicate limits of these protraction diagrams. Scale 1:250,000 69° _ i
HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMATION 5 ° 5 10 15 20 Statute Miles may be obtained, at the cost of reproduction, by \
‘SURVEY E E = addressing the Director (N/CG243), National 68°L__ ne ,
s €) INE SPACING 5 fe) Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric 147° oo 38° j
NUMBER SoATE. Sone iwavt. MILES) fee ey 2 10 18 20 25 30 Kilometers Administration, Rockville, Maryland 20862. |
#7980 1982 1:20,000 03-12 5. ° 5 10 15 Nautical Miles
7301 1982 1120000 08-10 SS ——
Hoyese 1852 120,000 oats
H79e4 1982 1:40,000 0-10

sidl WO
No. 48052.

#### Protests 993466-G, etc., of Henry Pollak, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and, on the. authority of Abstract 47291 the protests were sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:12-cr-132

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAVERS

DENNIS WOOD, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On June 22, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant Wood’s guilty plea to the

Information charging him with receiving and possessing firearms not registered to him in the National

Registration and Transfer Record in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5841, 5861(d) and 5871.

Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District

Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of

Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a

basis in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and

Recommendation by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and

Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure. Defendant did not file any objections. 

Case: 2:12-cr-00132-GCS-NMK Doc #: 23 Filed: 07/12/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of receiving

and possessing firearms not registered to him in the National Registration and Transfer Record. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:12-cr-00132-GCS-NMK Doc #: 23 Filed: 07/12/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          15,563
<SECURITIES>                                 3,873,216
<RECEIVABLES>                                  923,277
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,649,635
<PP&E>                                      80,711,367
<DEPRECIATION>                              28,873,945
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              67,992,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,118,429
<BONDS>                                     30,170,870
<COMMON>                                       178,430
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,098,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                67,992,359
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,021,049
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,816,044
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,783
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,191,257
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,995,965
<INCOME-TAX>                                   745,085
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,250,880
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,250,880
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Southern District of Ohio

Samelia J. McCray, )

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-829

Arthur R. McCray, et al.,

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

’ the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of %, along with costs.

’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

other: All claims against Bosch are DISMISSED with prejudice, all claims against A. McCray are 

 REMANDED to the Ross Cty. Court of Common Pleas, all parties 

 shall bear own costs and expenses. This action is DISMISSED. .

This action was (check one):

’ tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

’ tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: Sep 18, 2012 CLERK OF COURT

s/Denise Shane, Deputy Clerk

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-00829-JLG-EPD Doc #: 7 Filed: 09/19/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

      ( print page 19770)    

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax Credit Issue Committee will be conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Monday, May 14, 2006.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 (toll-free), or 718-488-2085 (non toll-free).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax Credit Issue Committee will be held Monday, May 14, 2007 from 10:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. ET via a telephone conference call. The public is invited to make oral comments. Individual comments will be limited to 5 minutes. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made in advance Ms. Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or (718) 488-2085. Written comments may be sent to Audrey Y. Jenkins, TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201 or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: April 12, 2007.

John Fay,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E7-7399 Filed 4-18-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
# C_2008301EN.01000402.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/4

---

Designation of the Chamber responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 104b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice

(2008/C 301/06)

At its meeting on 30 September 2008, the Court designated the Second Chamber of the Court as the Chamber which, in accordance with Article 9(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, is responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 104b of the Rules of Procedure, for the period from 7 October 2008 to 6 October 2009.

---
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10 - 16 - 00251 - CR No. 10 - 16 - 00252 - CR JOHNNY CANDIDO MANSO LO , Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 2015
- 447 - C1 & 2015
- 49 - C1

O RDER
Johnny Candido Mansolo ’s convictions were affirmed by this Court on December 14, 2014. See Mansolo v. State , Nos. 10

- 16

- 00251

- CR & 10

- 16

- 00252

- CR, 2016 Tex. App. Lexis 13224 (Tex. App.

— Waco Dec. 14, 2016, no pet. h.) (publish). After the convictions
were affirmed and Mansolo ’s appointed attorney was released from representing him pursuant to Anders procedures, see Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L.Mansolo v. State Page 2

Ed. 2d 493 (1967) , Mansolo filed a Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc requesting an additional 30 days to file a motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc in each appeal

. We granted Mansolo’s motion , and his motion for rehearing was due on February 10, 2017

. On February 13, 2017, we received another motion for extension of time from
Mansolo. Although the motion is styled, “In the Tenth Court of Appeals” and was specifically mailed to this Court, it is entitled, “Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Discretionary Review” and is add ressed to “The Honorable Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals.” We have determined that Mansolo has not previously filed a motion for extension of time to file a petition for discretionary review with the Court of Criminal Appeals. Further, in the mot ion he states his “petition for discretionary review” is due February 10, 2017, the date his motion for rehearing was due. Thus, we consider this motion to be a second motion for extension of time to file his motion for rehearing. In his first motion, Ma nsolo asked for an extension of 30 days to file his motion for rehearing. He was given over 30 days from the date it was otherwise due. He now requests an additional 60 days alleging he was not informed of our decision in his c ase until February 3, 2017 and wa s trying to “gain legal representation in this matter.” We note that Mansolo knew about our decision in his case well before February 3, 2017. Aside from the fact that his first motion was filed on December 30, 2016, and was signedMansolo v. State Page 3

by Mansolo, he a lso asserted in that motion that he needed the extension because he was only informed of our decision on December 20, 201 6

. Mansolo has had ample time to file a motion for rehearing in each of his appeals. His second motion, and the blatant misrepresen tations therein, shows to us that he is not serious in his attempts to file a motion for rehearing. We do not tolerate the type of game Mansolo is playing. Accordingly, Mansolo’s “Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Discretionary Rev iew , ” which we are treating as a second motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing, is denied.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Motion denied O rder issued and filed March 8, 2017
EXHIBIT 31

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Axel G. Roehlig, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Northwest Passage Ventures, Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition Rules contained
in SEC Release No. 33-8238;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions);

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: February 2, 2005



By:  /s/ Axel G. Roehlig
Axel G. Roehlig
President, Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer
and a member of the Board of Directors
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40805 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

JESUS MURILLO

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:16

- CR

- 1612

- 1

Before SOUTHWICK, WILLETT, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Murillo has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Murillo h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
June 20 , 2018
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40805 Document: 00514521346 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2018No. 17

- 40805

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANT ED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-40805 Document: 00514521346 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2018
# C_2007315EN.01002401.xml

| 22.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/24

---

Order of the Court of 11 October 2007 — Hans Peter Wilfer v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-301/05 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Word sign ‘ROCKBASS’ - Refusal to register - No need to adjudicate)

(2007/C 315/41)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Hans Peter Wilfer (represented by: A. Kocklauner, Rechtsanwalt)

Applicant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Schennen, O. Montalto and G. Schneider, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 8 June 2005 in Case T-315/03 Wilfer v OHIM by which the Court dismissed the action for annulment of the decision refusing to register the mark ‘ROCKBASS’ — Descriptive character of the trade mark

Wilfer

OHIM

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the appeal brought by Mr Wilfer. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the appeal brought by Mr Wilfer.

| 2. | Mr Wilfer is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Wilfer is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 281 of 12.11.2005.

1

---
Case: 2:12-cv-01186-EAS-EPD Doc #: 57 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T17:53:09-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO