alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

COUNCIL OPINION

of 14 March 2006

on the updated stability programme of Portugal, 2005-2009

(2006/C 82/08)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 of 7 July 1997 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies (1), and in particular Article 5(3) thereof,

Having regard to the recommendation of the Commission,

After consulting the Economic and Financial Committee,

HAS DELIVERED THIS OPINION:

In view of the above assessment, the Council notes that the programme is broadly consistent with a correction of the excessive deficit by 2008, subject to a full implementation of the measures announced in the programme that need to be reinforced for the years 2007 and beyond to accommodate the downward risks to the budgetary targets. In the light of the recommendations under Article 104(7) of 20 September 2005, the Council invites Portugal to:

Comparison of key macroeconomic and budgetary projections

----

(1)OJ L 209, 2.8.1997, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1055/2005 (OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 1). The documents referred to in this text can be found at the following website:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/economy_finance/about/activities/sgp/main_en.htm

(2)  In particular, the programme does not follow the model structure of the new code of conduct, it rather presents four sections: Summary; Economic and budgetary backdrop; Economic and budgetary outlook and Sustainability of public finances. The programme provides all compulsory data and most optional data prescribed by the new code of conduct.

(3)  Commission services calculations on the basis of the information in the programme.

(4)  Cyclically-adjusted balance (as in the previous rows) excluding one-off and other temporary measures.

(5)  There are no one-off and other temporary measures in the programme.

(6)  One-off and other temporary measures taken from the Commission services' autumn 2005 forecast: 2.2% of GDP in 2004, 0.4% of GDP in 2005 and 0.4% of GDP in 2006 and 0.1% of GDP in 2007; all deficit-reducing.

(7)  One-off operations taken from the June 2005 programme: 2.3% of GDP in 2004 and 0.2% of GDP in 2005; all deficit-reducing.

(8)  Based on estimated potential growth of 1.3%, 1.1%, 1.2% and 1.4% respectively in the period 2004-2007.

(9)  Private consumption deflator

Source:

Stability programme (SP); Commission services' autumn 2005 economic forecasts (COM); Commission services' calculations

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Torotel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the periodending July 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dale H. Sizemore, Jr., Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Dale H. Sizemore, Jr. |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                      |
|                      |
| Dale H. Sizemore, Jr.     |
| Chief Executive Officer   |
| March 30,  2005           |

 

----
Draft Proposal E-2 

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Existing Buildings Code (IEBC).   

Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft code

change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/iebc_concepts

Repair Definition (E-2) 

Objective: Expand definition of “repair” to include retrofits and changes to energy systems. 

Suggested Code Change Proposal 

Revise Section 202 as follows: 

The restoration to good or sound condition or renewal of any part of an existing building 

that is not an alteration for the purpose of its maintenance.

Reason: For consistency with the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC). The 

terms “good” and “sound” are not used in the 2012 IECC and are subjective. The wording “for 

the purpose of its maintenance” is a reason for the text but not relevant to a definition. Who 

determines if something is necessary for maintenance and what metric is to be used? Simply 

saying “restoration or renewal,” along with the clarification that it is other than an alteration, 

would clarify this term in the code. This is especially important because this definition and the 

definition of alteration are key to determining which of Chapters 6, 7, 8, and/or 9 are applicable 

to the work being conducted. 

Cost Impact: There is no cost impact other than ensuring that maybe something that might not 

have been considered within the scope of the International Existing Buildings Code (IEBC) 

would now, through clarification, be considered.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7123

THOMAS FRANKLIN BOWLING, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. GENE JOHNSON, Director, VDOC; VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:09-cv-00085-jlk-mfu)

Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 20, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Franklin Bowling, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Thomas Franklin Bowling seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bowling has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
----

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 5 April 2006 — Saiwa v OHMI

(Case T-344/03) (1)

(Community trade mark - Application for a figurative mark including the word element ‘SELEZIONE ORO Barilla’ - Opposition - Earlier word marks ORO and ORO SAIWA - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Opposition rejected)

(2006/C 131/72)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Saiwa SpA (Genoa Italy) (represented by: G. Sena, P. Tarchini, J.-P. Karsenty and M. Karsenty-Ricard, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: M. Capostagno and O. Montalto, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: Barilla Alimentare SpA (Parma, Italy) (represented by: A. Vanzetti and S. Bergia, lawyers)

Re:

Action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 July 2003 (R 480/2002-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Saiwa SpA and Barilla Alimentare SpA

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 304, 13.12.2003.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       7,329,414
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,934,968
<ALLOWANCES>                                   477,624
<INVENTORY>                                 14,667,945
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,409,951
<PP&E>                                      23,594,322
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,620,088
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,914,024
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,278,365
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,164,490
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,471,169
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,914,024
<SALES>                                     20,685,942
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,685,942
<CGS>                                        9,015,870
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,136,839
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (190,383)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,723,616
<INCOME-TAX>                                   953,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,770,616
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,770,616
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 301/5 Se

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 301 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 575 September 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 301

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 575 September 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 301/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 301/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2014/C 301/02 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation) (1) | 4 |
| 2014/C 301/03 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 | 9 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2014/C 301/02

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation) (1)

4

2014/C 301/03

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Before the First Division,

January 9, 1941

No. 45138.

#### Protests 697906-G, etc., of Henry Pollak, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar to that the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.
Case: 2:12-cv-01209-EAS-NMK Doc #: 18 Filed: 01/29/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T21:17:20-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 2, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 39729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15868]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS13-17]

Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104 (b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in closed session:
    Location: OCC--400 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20024.
    Date: July 10, 2013.
    Time: Immediately following the ASC open session.
    Status: Closed.
    Matters to be Considered: June 12, 2013 minutes--Closed Session. 
Preliminary discussion of State Compliance Reviews.

    Dated: June 27, 2013.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-15868 Filed 7-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
# **EXHIBIT 32.1**

#  

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) thisQuarterly Report of Cruzan International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company asof March 31, 2005 and its results of operations for the period ended March 31,2005.

 
|   | /s/ Jay S.  Maltby                                 |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Jay S. Maltby                                      |
|   | Chairman , Chief Executive  Officer  and President |

 

 

Date:  May 13, 2005

 

1

----
Exhibit 31.4





Certification of Chief Financial Officer





I, R. Craig Owen, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rosehill Resources Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2018; and





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





By:/s/ R. Craig OwenName:R. Craig OwenTitle:Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





Date: June 21, 2019
No. 17,802.

#### United States v William C. Hewett, PFC, U. S. Marine Corps. (NCM 64-0473).

On consideration of the Petition for Grant of Review of the decision of the Board of Review in case No. NCM 64-0473 of the United States Navy it appears that the accused’s absence without leave commenced on March 6, 1952, and was, for the purpose of determining the correct maximum punishment, committed on that date, but that the law officer improperly utilized the provisions of Executive Order 10565, September 28, 1954, 16 FR 6299, to inform the court-martial that the maximum punishment which might be imposed extended to dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement at hard labor for one year, and reduction. The court adjudged a sentence which included that maximum, and such has been approved at every level. Insofar as it purports to adjudge confinement at hard labor in excess of a period of six months, the sentence is illegal and void. United States v Bruner, 11 USCMA 658, 29 CMR 474; United States v Emerson, 1 USCMA 43, 1 CMR 43. It is, therefore, by the Court, this 24th day of July, 1964,

ORDERED:

That said Petition be, and the same is, hereby granted.

The decision of the Board of Review is reversed, and the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy. The Board of Review may reassess the sentence or order a rehearing thereon.
# Official Journal C 236/6 Ju

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 236 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 616 July 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 236

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 616 July 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 236/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections
   (1
  ) | 1 |
| 2018/C 236/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - Cases where the Commission raises no objections
   (2
  ) | 3 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 236/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections
   (1
  )

1

1

2018/C 236/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - Cases where the Commission raises no objections
   (2
  )

2

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 236/03 | State aid — Romania — State aid SA.48394 (2018/C) (ex 2017/N) — Restructuring of National Uranium Company (Compania Nationala a Uraniului CNU) — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
   (1
  ) | 6 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2018/C 236/03

State aid — Romania — State aid SA.48394 (2018/C) (ex 2017/N) — Restructuring of National Uranium Company (Compania Nationala a Uraniului CNU) — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
   (1
  )

1

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty.

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Case: 2:11-cv-00133-MHW-TPK Doc #: 12 Filed: 12/13/11 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00133-MHW-TPK Doc #: 12 Filed: 12/13/11 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T21:52:21-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer**


**pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted**


**pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002** ****




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NYFIX, Inc. for the
      quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Steven R. Vigliotti, as
      Chief Financial Officer of NYFIX, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to the best of his knowledge the Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NYFIX,
      Inc.




Dated:
                November 10, 2008By:
            / S/
                Steven R. VigliottiSteven
                R. VigliottiChief
                Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In Connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Properties Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James M. Kemper, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ James M. Kemper, Jr.
----------------------------
James M. Kemper, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002