alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
110 STAT. 3018 PUBLIC LAW 104–215—OCT. 1, 1996

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3287:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–700 (Comm. on Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

July 30, considered and passed House.

Sept. 19, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–215

104th Congress

An Act

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey the Crawford National Fish Hatchery

to the city of Crawford, Nebraska.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Crawford National Fish Hatchery

Conveyance Act’’.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF CRAWFORD NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY TO

THE CITY OF CRAWFORD, NEBRASKA.

(a) CONVEYANCE REQUIREMENT.—Within 180 days after the

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior

shall convey to the city of Crawford, Nebraska, without reimbursement, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and

to the property described in subsection (b), for use by the city

for a city park and other public recreational purposes.

(b) PROPERTY DESCRIBED.—The property referred to in subsection (a) is the property known as the Crawford National Fish

Hatchery, located in the city of Crawford, Nebraska, consisting

of 5.95 acres (more or less), and all improvements and related

personal property under the control of the Secretary that is located

on that property, including buildings, structures, equipment, and

all easements, leases, and water rights relating to that property.

(c) USE AND REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—If any of the property

conveyed to the city of Crawford, Nebraska, under this section

is used by the city for any purpose other than the uses authorized

under subsection (a), all right, title, and interest in and to all

property conveyed under this section shall revert to the United

States. The city of Crawford, Nebraska, shall ensure that all property that reverts to the United States under this subsection is

in substantially the same or better condition as at the time of

conveyance to the city.

Approved October 1, 1996.

Crawford

National Fish

Hatchery

Conveyance Act.

Oct. 1, 1996

[H.R. 3287]
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2013-0943

Docket Number

2013-SW-001-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket - NPRM

Agusta Bollettino Tecnico (BT) No. 109-135, dated December 19, 2012;

Agusta BT No. 109EP-125, dated December 19, 2012;

Agusta BT No. 109K-55, dated December 19, 2012; and 

Agusta BT No. 119-052, dated December 19, 2012.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 77 (Monday, April 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7616]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,625]


Huntington Foam Pittsburgh Corporation, a Subsidiary of 
Huntington Foam Corporation, Mt. Pleasant, PA; Dismissal of Application 
for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Huntington Foam Pittsburgh 
Corporation, a subsidiary of Huntington Foam Corporation, Mt. Pleasant, 
Pennsylvania. The application did not contain new information 
supporting a conclusion that the determination was erroneous, and also 
did not provide a justification for reconsideration of the 
determination that was based on either mistaken facts or a 
misinterpretation of facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal of the 
application was issued.

TA-W-60,625; Huntington Foam Pittsburgh Corporation, a Subsidiary of 
Huntington Foam Corporation, Mt. Pleasant, Pennsylvania (April 9, 
2007).

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of April 2007.
Ralph DiBattista,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-7616 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Case: 2:13-cv-00005-JLG-TPK Doc #: 12 Filed: 05/10/13 Page: 1 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:13-cv-00005-JLG-TPK Doc #: 12 Filed: 05/10/13 Page: 2 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:13-cv-00005-JLG-TPK Doc #: 12 Filed: 05/10/13 Page: 3 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:13-cv-00005-JLG-TPK Doc #: 12 Filed: 05/10/13 Page: 4 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:13-cv-00005-JLG-TPK Doc #: 12 Filed: 05/10/13 Page: 5 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:13-cv-00005-JLG-TPK Doc #: 12 Filed: 05/10/13 Page: 6 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:13-cv-00005-JLG-TPK Doc #: 12 Filed: 05/10/13 Page: 7 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T14:48:16-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Regency
Affiliates, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Neil N. Hasson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
            Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of
            operations of the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: November 22, 2004

                                                /s/ Neil N. Hasson
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Neil N. Hasson
                                                Chief Financial Officer
# Official Journal C 71A/25 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 71A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5225 March 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 71A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5225 March 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Medicines Agency |
| 2009/C 071A/01 | Call for expression of interest for Contract Agents for temporary assignments (EMEA, London) | 1 |
| 2009/C 071A/02 | Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London) | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Medicines Agency

2009/C 071A/01

Call for expression of interest for Contract Agents for temporary assignments (EMEA, London)

1

2009/C 071A/02

Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London)

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of NYFIX,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the  period  ending  March 31,  2003 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Peter K.  Hansen,
Chairman,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Peter K. Hansen
-----------------------
Peter K. Hansen
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003

This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```
* This decision is rendered by a quorum, due to the retirement of then-Chief Judge Hatchett on May 14, 1999. 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). Forrest Kelly CLAY, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. RIVERWOOD INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Thomas H. Johnson, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 97-8592. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 27, 1999. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. (No. 1:95-CV-3147-CAM), Charles A. Moye, Jr., Judge. ON PETITION FOR REHEARING. Before DUBINA and CARNES, Circuit Judges *

. PER CURIAM: Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing, the prior opinion issued on October 14, 1998, and published at 157 F.3d 1259, is modified, as follows: We vacate the introductory paragraph and also Part III A. of our prior opinion in this case, found at 157 F.3d at 1259, 1261, 1263-68, and adopt in their place the concurring opinion of Judge Carnes, which is found in 157 F.3d at 1269-71. We also vacate Part IV of our prior opinion and s ubstitute in its place this paragraph: As to the insider trading issue involving Clay's stock appreciation rights, we do not decide whether those rights are securities or otherwise trigger the "disclose or abstain" ru le of insider trading, but instead affirm the district court's judgment on the ground that Clay lacks standing to bring a claim under § 20A of the Securities and Exchange Act. As to the securities fraud issue invol ving Riverwood's July 1995 press release, we affirm the judgment of the district court because that release di d not require any subseque nt disclosure under § 10(b) or Rule 10b-5.

## 2 AFFIRMED.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 292 

Calling on the President to condemn the anti-Israel sentiments expressed 

by the President of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, on October 26, 2005. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 27, 2005 

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mr. SMITH, Mr. DODD, Mrs. DOLE, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mr. CORZINE, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. LEVIN, 

Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. COLEMAN, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Calling on the President to condemn the anti-Israel sentiments expressed by the President of Iran, Mahmoud 

Ahmadinejad, on October 26, 2005. 

Whereas, on October 26, 2005, the President of Iran, 

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, said that Israel must be ‘‘wiped 

off the map’’ and that ‘‘[a]nybody who recognizes Israel 

will burn in the fire of the Islamic nations’ fury’’; 

Whereas the Department of State has designated Iran as a 

state sponsor of terrorism that has repeatedly provided 

support for acts of international terror; 

Whereas the Government of Iran sponsors terrorist organizations such as Hezbollah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the alAqsa Martyrs Brigades, and PFLP–GC by providing 
2 

•SRES 292 ATS

funding, training, weapons, and safe haven to such organizations; and 

Whereas the outrageous statements of Mr. Ahmadinejad are 

not in accord with the expressions of the Palestinian 

leadership in the peace process: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) thoroughly repudiates the anti-Israel senti3 ments expressed by the President of Iran, Mahmoud 

4 Ahmadinejad, on October 26, 2005; and 

5 (2) calls on the President, on behalf of the 

6 United States, to thoroughly repudiate, in the 

7 strongest terms possible, the statement by Mr. 

8 Ahmadinejad. 

Æ
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Annual Emissions Estimates from SPI-Anderson Stoker Boiler

Proposed PSD Permit No. SAC 12-01

TO: File for Administrative Record

As noted on Page 9 of the Ambient Air Quality Impact Report, annual emissions estimates differ from the PSD 

Application submission by SPI and Environ. EPA calculated annual emissions estimates at worst case annual heat 

input of 468 MMBtu/hr, not 425 MMBtu/hr, and the CO BACT limit was revised to 0.23 lb/MMBtu. 

As a result emissions were calculated as follows:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:12-cr-039

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAVERS

RICHARD KENDRICK, JR., 

Defendant.

ORDER

On March 16, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant Kendrick’s guilty plea to

Count One of the Information charging him with conspiracy to distribute more than 500 grams of

cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B) and §846. Defendant, represented by

counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge

conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s

plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:12-cr-00039-GCS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 04/02/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count One of the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of

conspiracy to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:12-cr-00039-GCS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 04/02/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
KAYR. HAGAIM

NORTH CAROLINA

United States Senate

WASHINGTON, DC 20510-3309

COMMITTEES:

ARMED SERVICES

BANKING, HOUSING, AND

URBAN AFFAIRS

HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR,

AND PENSIONS

SMALL BUSINESS AND

ENTREPRENEURSHIP

May 21, 2014

The Honorable Gina McCarthy

Administrator

Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20460

Dear Administrator McCarthy,

I write to request that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provide at least a 120-

day comment period for the upcoming proposal to regulate greenhouse gas emissions

from existing power plants.

Addressing carbon emissions from existing generation units presents challenges and

opportunities. It will almost certainly be among the most technically complex regulations

to be considered under the Clean Air Act. While the science on the reality of global

warming is clear, any effort to reduce carbon emissions will benefit from collaboration

and dialogue between diverse stakeholders and interested parties.

Balancing environmental priorities with economic and technological challenges are

paramount to the ultimate success of any rule seeking to combat global warming. I

believe that providing ample opportunity for diverse viewpoints to be shared on this

forthcoming proposal is a means toward achieving that objective.

Thank you for your consideration of this request.

Sincerely,

Kay R. Hagan

United States Senator

521 Dirksen Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510-3309

(202)224-6342

701 Green Valley Road, Suite 201

Greensboro, NC 27408

(336)333-5311

Toll Free: (877) 852-9462

310 New Bern Avenue

Raleigh, NC 27601

(919)856-4630

1520 South Boulevard, Suite 205

Charlotte, NC 28203

(704) 334-2448

82 Patton Avenue, Suite 635

Asheville, NC 28801

(828)257-6510

website: www.hagan.senate.gov

e-mail: www.hagan.senate.gov/contact

PRINTED ON RECYCLED paper

301 South Evans Street, Suite 102

Greenville, NC 27858

(252)754-0707
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v JOHN DAVID FREELAND, Engineman Fireman, U. S. Navy, Appellant

19 USCMA 455, 42 CMR 57

No. 22,651

May 22, 1970

*Lieutenant Martin A. Selzer,*JAGC, USNR, argued the cause for Appellant, Accused. With him on the brief was *Captain John N. Stafford,*USMCR.

*Lieutenant Thomas J. Donegan, Jr.,*JAGC, USNR, argued the cause for Appellee, United States. With him on the brief was *Lieutenant Colonel Charles J. Keever,*USMC.

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

Here, as in United States v Weatherford, 19 USCMA 424, 42 CMR 26 (1970), the question is whether defense counsel violated his responsibilities as counsel by making it apparent to the court members that the accused desired to be separated from the service, even with a punitive discharge, in preference to confinement. Defense counsel did not, as in *Weatherford,*argue that a bad-conduct discharge was an appropriate punishment, but he made the point clear by the answers he elicited from the accused, who testified under oath in connection with the sentence.

An examination of the record leaves no doubt that defense counsel acted in response to the accused’s considered desire. The accused had a history of unauthorized absence from December 7, 1968; he was substantially in debt; and he had no desire “to go back to duty,” notwithstanding the “bad effects” a punitive discharge could have on his “life later on.”

On the record, the present case is substantially like *Weatherford.*For the reasons set out in our opinion in that case, we affirm the decision of the United States Navy Court of Military Review.

Judge Darden concurs.

Ferguson, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent.

Since I do not believe that defense counsel may, consistent with ethical principles, urge, or, by other means, impart to the court members his belief that his client should be punitively *456separated from the service, I must record my dissent in this case. For a further exposition of my thinking on this matter, see my dissent in United States v Weatherford, 19 USCMA 424, 42 CMR 26 (1970).
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER AND N OTICE OF I NTENT TO D ISMISS FOR W ANT OF P ROSECUTION

Appellate case name: Lemorris Grover and Marcelo Sanchez a/k/a Marcelo
Sanchez

- Reyes v. Terence and Carolyn McGuinness

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 1

- 00 20 4

- CV

Trial court case number: 2006

- 59727

Trial court: 61st District Court of Harris County

This appeal was stayed pursuant to the Suggestion of Ban kruptcy filed in this Court on February 23, 201 2 , stating that one appellant, Lemorris Grover

, had filed a bankruptcy petition i n the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, which was assigned case number 1 2

- 31 3 6 4. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.2 ; s ee also 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) . Through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records website, the Court has learned that appellant’s bankruptcy case was dismissed on May 2 8 , 201 4

. Accordingly,
the Court directs the Clerk of thi s Court to r einstate this appeal as an active case

. However, t he filing fee ha s not been paid and the clerk’s record ha s not yet been filed due to appellant Grover ’s lack of payment and he ha s not established indigence

. Thus, appellant s are ORDERED t o pay the $1 7 5.00 filing fee to the Clerk of this Court
and to request the clerk’s record and pay, or make arrangements to pay, for the clerk’s record fee, and file evidence of such payment with the Clerk of this Court within 30 days of the date of this order, or th is appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution
without further notice

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 5 , 37.3(b), 42.3 (b), (c)

. In addition

, because appellant Grover ’s counsel

, Kevin R. Michaels, had filed a
motion to withdraw , which was still pending at the time of the stay

, counsel is
ORDERED to send a copy of this order to Lemorris Grover and to file confirmation of mailing with this Court within 10 days of this order. See id. 6.3(c), 6.5(a)(2), (b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

 Acting individually

Date: August 16, 2016
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL AP PEALS OF TENNES SEE AT NAS HVILLE On Re m and from

the Te nnessee Suprem e Court STA TE OF TEN NES SEE v. AN THON Y RIGGS Direc t Appeal from the Circ uit Court for Wayne County

No. 13,665 Stella Hargrove , Judge

No. M2007- 02322-RM -CD - F iled May 7, 2008

J A M ES C UR WO OD W I TT , J R ., J ., co n cu rr i n g.

Iconcur in the majority

opinion ex cept I

would have not r elied upon the pr esente nce repor t for a Blak

e ly -ty pe admission. See State v. Charles Vantilburg III , No. W20 06 -0 24 75 -C CA -R 3- CD (T e nn . Cr im. Ap p. , a t Jac ks on , F e b. 12 , 20 08 ) (h old ing that st a te me nts “made outside the confine s of any judicial proce eding . . . do not qualify as admissions for purpose s of the Six th Amendment”)

.

___________________________________ J AMES CURW OOD WI TT, J R., J UDGE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 22-0103

SKYLINE CONSULTING GROUP,

 

 Appellant,

 and

MORTENSEN WOODWORK, INC., 

 Appellee.

 

 

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Having considered the Appellee’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time 

to File Appellee’s Brief in Response to Appellant’s Opening Brief and good cause 

being found, the Court HEREBY ORDERS: that the deadline for Appellee to file 

his response brief be extended 30 days from Wednesday, May 18, 2022, to Friday, 

June 17, 2022. 

ORDERED this ___ day of _______________ 2022.

cc: Cherche Prezeau/Colin Phelps

Ryan Lorenz/Jame R. Artzer

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

May 18 2022

05/18/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0103