alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

RUSSELL JUNIOR DIEHL,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 96-1361

BRYAN E. SAUBLE,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.

William G. Connelly, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-94-2673-S)

Submitted: February 13, 1997

Decided: February 27, 1997

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and

BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Michael L. Sandul, LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT GRAHAM FIORE,

Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellant. W. Barry Wraga, Kensington,

Maryland, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Brian Lee Sauble appeals from a jury verdict requiring him to pay

$20,900 in future medical expenses to the plaintiff in a civil diversity

car accident case. We affirm.

Sauble claims that the amount awarded for future medical expenses

was in excess of that established by the plaintiff's expert and therefore not supported by reasonable certainty. He does not attack the evidence by which future injury justifying future medical expenses was

demonstrated, and we therefore express no opinion as to the sufficiency of that evidence. Under Maryland law if a jury believes the

plaintiff's expert as to a condition which will result in future damages,

the amount to be awarded is a question for the jury. DiLeo v. Nugent,

592 A.2d 1126, 1135 (Md. Ct. Spec. App.), cert. granted, 599 A.2d

90 (Md. 1991). Further, the question of whether a verdict is either

excessive or inadequate is one for the trial court, in the exercise of its

sound discretion, to decide on a motion for a new trial. Kujawa v. Baltimore Transit Co., 167 A.2d 96, 102 (Md. 1961). Sauble did not

move for a new trial, but rather moved for the verdict to be made to

conform to the evidence and to the amount claimed in discovery. We

find nothing in the material submitted by the parties which suggests

an abuse of discretion in the denial of this motion and accordingly we

affirm.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 2
Owosso Graphic Arts 

Terri Zick to: Christopher Lambesis 05/04/2007 04:32 PM 

From: 

To: 

"Terri Zick" <tzick@cticompanies.com > 

Christopher Lambesis/R5/USEPA/US@EPA 

Christopher, 

In our recent conversations, you had inquired about Cyanide. As there were fewer CN results than other 

parameters, Owosso Graphic Arts chose to collect additional samples for analysis to assist in your review. 

Attached is a summary of the results. I will forward the data sheets as soon as I receive the final lab 

report. 

The other parameter you had inquired about was Zinc. I believe that there are numerous zinc results, and 

am hopeful that you have sufficient data for this parameter. 

You had commented on the fact that the Owosso Graphic Arts web site advertises brass dies as well as 

magnesium and copper. I confirmed with the owner/operators that the brass product line involves only 

engraving and does not include etching or other chemical treatment. 

I look forward to discussing this petition with you further. I will contact you at the beginning of next week. 

Thank you! 

Terri Zick 

313-300-7401
No. 65688.

#### John V. Carr & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/7507 (Detroit).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 396 

Congratulating Rosey Fletcher for her Olympic bronze medal in the parallel 

giant slalom. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2006 

Mr. STEVENS (for himself and Ms. MURKOWSKI) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Rosey Fletcher for her Olympic bronze medal 

in the parallel giant slalom. 

Whereas on February 23, 2006, Rosey Fletcher became the 

first woman from the United States to win an Olympic 

medal in the parallel giant slalom; 

Whereas Rosey Fletcher won a bronze medal for her performance at the 2006 Torino Olympic Winter Games; 

Whereas Rosey Fletcher is the only snowboarder to have competed in 3 Winter Olympic Games; 

Whereas Rosey Fletcher was a silver medalist at the 1999 

and 2001 world championships and is ranked 8th in the 

parallel giant slalom on the World Cup circuit; 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•SRES 396 ATS

Whereas February 23, 2006, was declared ‘‘Rosey Fletcher 

Day’’ by Alyeska Resort in honor of her Olympic achievement and mentoring of young Alaskan athletes; and 

Whereas Rosey Fletcher is a hometown hero from Girdwood, 

Alaska: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate congratulates Rosey 

2 Fletcher for winning the bronze medal in the parallel giant 

3 slalom. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1


                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Michael
R. Mulcahy, President and Chief Executive Officer of Trans-Lux Corporation, do
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

    (1) The Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

    This Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not
be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Registrant or
the certifying officer.



                                       /s/ Michael R. Mulcahy
                                       -------------------------------------
Date:  November 17, 2008               Michael R. Mulcahy
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 8 1595 Wynkoop Street DENVER, CO 80202-1129 Phone 800-227-8917 http://wviV'J.epa.gov!region08 

## MAR 

## 23 2009 Urian Ciustafsol1, Administrator Air 

### Quality Program 

### Dept. (If**l~nviromm:nt** & 

### Natura) Resources Jue l'uss 

### Building, :'23 

### F, ('apilOl Pkn('. SJ) 57501 RE: South Dakota 20t)8 \1onituring Network Plan
Dear \Ir. (iustal:'iOlJ: ! am \Hiling 

### this k'ttl'r**t~)** prt)\ 

### ide approval ufth..: S(luth Dakota**[)1~'\R20()8** 

### Ambient :\ir \loniloring 

### :\nnua! '\clwork 

### Plan. The plan prl'rured by your stall is 

### an ,;xcdknt document. providing a thorough**l)\l~rvic\\** Ol'thl' ambient air 

### lllonitoring dcli\ ilies ofynur departmcnt. it 

### shnllJd prrl\e lIsefult,) 

### your statr 

### FPA and 

### to the general public. The CI·R providcs 

### a list of required 

### inl<mnation to be 

### included in each 

### al1llual plan. The 2008 South 

### Dakota Plan included all these dements. As alv
..

### ays. the**l~PA** 

### staff arc available to ans\\cr questions 

### you may have and provide**hl~lp** where needed. You 

### may contact me with questions at (303) 312-6434. or. 

### ir members 

### or your**~;larf** tum: 

### qUL:stiul1s the) 

### rna) contact Richard [>,lytOI1 at OO}) 3 J2-6439.


### Sincerely,

./) ,).i1/
.... Call ie 0\. Videtich.\)irettor Air Program 

# *

PI/flted on Rr:cycfed Paper
#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7574.

Entry Nos. 728919/1/2 and 728289/1/2.

Invoices dated Longton, England, November 3, 1945, etc

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 19, 1945, etc.

(Decided March 30, 1948)

*John R. Rafter*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This proceeding has been submitted upon a stipulation wherein the parties hereto have agreed that the issues involved in these reappraisements are the same in all material respects as in the case of *United States v. Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334. The record in that case was admitted as part of the record herein.

In view of the aforesaid stipulation and accepting same as a statement of fact, and in view of the decision cited, I find and hold that the export values of the merchandise are the values found by the appraiser, less any additions on entry by the importer by reason of advances by the appraiser in similar cases to equal the so-called British purchase tax.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors and shareholdersof CoreLogic, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the"Company"), a subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loanoutsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial taxservice provider (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2016 and forthe year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii),1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii)and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included testing of selected servicingactivities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Companyperformed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activitiesperformed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Ourprocedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors thatmay have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affectedthe balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the periodcovered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonablebasis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determinationon the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicableservicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for all loansfor commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company servedas the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in all materialrespects.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

 

February 6, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas TX 75201-2997*

*T: 214-746-6500, F:214-712-6660,*www.pwc.com
Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3 
 

 
 August 1, 2008 
 Via email:
dennisryll@yahoo.com and 
 nevada2595@yahoo.com 
 Dennis L. Ryll, M.D. 
 1029 Speckledwood Manor Court 
 Chesterfield, MO 63017 
 RE: Biovest International, Inc. – $46,015.10 Loan [Pulaski Interest] 
 Dear Dennis: 
 As you know Biovest’s Unsecured Promissory Note to you
dated October 1, 2007, in the principal amount of $46,015.10 (the “Note”) has been continued at your consent from its original maturity on May 31, 2008. In connection with and to potentially facilitate its financing efforts,
Biovest wishes to memorialize the continuation of the maturity through October 1, 2009. 
 If you agree, please so indicate by signing where indicated
below and return to us as soon as possible. 
 If you have any questions, please call. Thank you. 
 Sincerely, 
  

	
	 /s/    James A. McNulty

	James A. McNulty, CPA

 Tel: 813-864-2554 ext. 262 
 Email: jamcnulty@biovest.com 
 EXTENSION OF UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE 
 The undersigned hereby amends the terms of the Unsecured Promissory Note (the “Note”) dated October 1, 2007, to provide that the maturity date of the
Note shall be October 1, 2009 at which time all principal and accrued interest pursuant to the Note shall be due and payable in full in one installment. 
  

					
	 /s/    Dennis L. Ryll
	 		 	Dated: 08/12/08                    
	Dennis L. Ryll, M.D.	 		 	

  
  
 324 S Hyde Park Avenue Suite 350 Tampa, Florida 33606 
 www.biovest.com t: 813 864 2554 f: 813 258 1621
No. 41960.

#### Protest 386330-G of Saks & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel atomizers, boxes, flaeons, caskets, trays, match holders, photo frames, lamps, bottles, dresser sets, boxes, and droppers were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339. *United States*v. *Friedlaender*(21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), *Dow*v. *United States*(id. 282, T. D. 46816), *Woolworth*v. *United States*(T. D. 47857), *Rice*v. *United States*(T. D. 49373), and Abstract 39787 cited.
Exhibit 34.10



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Tothe Board of Directors and shareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services,
Inc. (the Company), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan
outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider (the Platform), as of December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi),
1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Companys
compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our
examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company
performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not
designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2015 for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in all material respects.

February 4, 2016







LOGO







LOGO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000097452
<NAME> TEXAS GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             461
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,346
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,601
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,135
<PP&E>                                         940,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,843
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,316,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          112,392
<BONDS>                                        254,101
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     707,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,316,500
<SALES>                                         44,553
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               262,477
<CGS>                                           43,976
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  121,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,807
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,796
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,343
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,428
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,915
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,915
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 2/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.002.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 2 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 545 January 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.002.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 2

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 545 January 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 002/01 | Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 1,00 % on 1 January 2011 — Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 002/01

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 1,00 % on 1 January 2011 — Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 002/02 | Call for proposals — EACEA/36/10 — EU-US Cooperation in Higher Education and Vocational Training — Atlantis: Actions for Transatlantic Links and Academic Networks in Training and Integrated Studies — Call for proposals 2011 | 2 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2011/C 002/02

Call for proposals — EACEA/36/10 — EU-US Cooperation in Higher Education and Vocational Training — Atlantis: Actions for Transatlantic Links and Academic Networks in Training and Integrated Studies — Call for proposals 2011

2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Memorandum

Date: February 1, 2021

Reply to Attn of: MP&E 21-01

Subject: Technical Bulletin MP&E 21-01, Submission of Forms and Notifications for 

Steam Locomotives, Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 230

From: Charles King, Director, Office of Railroad Infrastructure and Mechanical 

Equipment

To: All Safety Management Teams, Motive Power and Equipment (MP&E) 

Specialists, Railroad Safety Oversight Managers, State Program Managers, and 

all Federal and State MP&E Inspectors

Background: The purpose of this Technical Bulletin (TB) is to provide Inspectors with 

guidance in the application of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 230 

Steam locomotive standards. On June 1, 2020, the Office of Railroad Safety 

implemented a major reorganization that eliminated all former Regional Offices. In 

doing so, the position of Regional Administrator was abolished. Throughout Part 230, 

the owner and/or operators of steam locomotives are instructed to send all required 

notifications and forms for the operation and maintenance of steam locomotives to the 

Regional Administrator where the locomotive is maintained/operated. Examples are, but 

not limited to Form No. 4 Boiler Specification Card, Form No. 5 Locomotive Service 

Day Record, Form No. 19 Report of Alteration or Welded or Riveted Repair, et. al.

Guidance: FRA recognizes that owner and/or operators of steam locomotives may 

continue to submit the required forms and inspection notifications to the Regional 

Administrator, as specified in the current CFR. Until the various sections of Part230 

are amended to reflect the reorganization, owners and/or operators are to make all 

notifications, and submit all forms to:

Staff Director, Motive Power and Equipment Division

Federal Railroad Administration

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Mail Stop-25

Washington, DC 20590
2

Upon receiving such notifications/forms, the Motive Power & Equipment (MP&E) 

Division will notify and distribute copies of all information to the appropriate MP&E 

Specialist. Concurrently, the MP&E Division is developing an electronic database 

where all Specialists and Inspectors will have access to the steam locomotive’s file for 

both current and legacy forms and information.

In addition, District MP&E Specialists are requested to inform all steam locomotive 

owners and/or operators in their Districts of the changes to the notice and filing 

procedures. Also, reaffirm with them that for all 1472 service day inspections shall 

include all annual, and 5th annual, inspection requirements, as well as any items 

required by the steam locomotive owner and/or operator or the FRA inspector. This 

includes all notifications for planned inspections.

If there are any questions or concerns regarding the notification or submission of 

steam locomotive related forms, please contact the Staff Director of the MP&E 

Division in the Office of Railroad Infrastructure and Mechanical Equipment at (202) 

493-6322.

#
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

NAEEM JONES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 216 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of November, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.