Technical Report 690

An Investigation of Alternatives for Setting

Second-to-Third Tour Reenlistment Standards

Frances C. Grafton and David K. Home

CD

=.".

Manpower and Personnel Policy Research Group

Manpower and Personnel Research Laboratory

""" DTIC

AMNELCTE

"FEB 21986

.4 ' U. S. Army

Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences

August 1985

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

86 2 25 11 7

.- .* ,,
U. S. ARMY RESEARCH INSTITUTE

FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES

A Field Operating Agency under the Jurisdiction of the

Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel

WM. DARRYL HENDERSON

EDGAR M. JOHNSON COL, IN

Technical Director Commanding

Accession For

Technical review by NTIS GRA I

DTIC TAP

Jeffrey Horey Unan -- El

Lawrence L. Hanser Justin'l

Distr 1 ,. -

NOTICES

DISTRIBUTION: Primary distribution of this report has been made by ARI. Please address correspondence concerning distribution of reports to: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral

and Social Sciences, ATTN: PERI-POT, 5001 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, Virginia 22333-5600.

o FINAL DISPOSITION: This report may be destroyed when it is no longer needed. Please do not

return it to the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

NOTE: The findings in this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army

position, unless so designated oy other authorized documents.

I oVi
UNCLASSIFIED

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (Wh.n Dat. F.ntered)

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE BEFORE COMPLETING FORM

I. REPORT NUMBER 2. G VT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER

ARI Technical Report 690 , / &L

4. .mv TfTYPE TITLE (arid Subtitle) • F - - OF REPORT & PERIOD COVERED

AN INVESTIGATION OF ALTERNATIVES FOR SETTING Final Report

SECOND-TO-THIRD TOUR REENLISTMENT STANDARDS January 1985-August 1985

6. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER

MPPRG Working Paper 85-2 7. AUTHOR(s) S. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER(&)

Frances C. Grafton

David K. Horne

9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. PROGRAM ELEMENT. PROJECT, TASK

AREA & WORK UNIT NUMBERS

U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral 20263731A792

and Social Sciences 212 2170

5001 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22333-5600

I1. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATE

ODCSPER 26 August 1985 U.S.E U. Army13. NUMBER OF PAGES S. Army

14. MONITORING AGENCY NAME & ADDRESS(If dilerent from Controlling Office) 15. SECURITY CLASS. (of this report)

U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral

and Social Sciences Unclassified

5001 Eisenhower Avenue IS5. DECLASS#FICATION/DOWNGRADING

Alexandria, VA 22333-5600 SCHEDULE

16. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of this Report)

* Approved for public release; distribution unlimited

17. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of Che abstract entered In Block 20, It dlfferent from Report)

1S. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

19. KEY WORDS (Continue on reverse side It necessary and Identify by block number)

Reenlistment criteria Regressions

I SQT Correlations

Qoalifications AFQT

Manpower quality Performance

MOS Tests

2Q. ABSTRACT (Coatinue am reverse .dp II nmceeay and Idenilty by block number)

This paper was written in response to a request from the Office of the

Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel, Department of the Army. The task was to

investigate the appropriateness of using the General Technical (GT) composite

of the ASVAB as a reenlistment criterion. Three aptitude measures, all ASVAB

composites, were compared to measures of proficiency in job performance:

Armed Forces Qualification Test (AFQT), General Technical (GT), and the specific Aptitude Area (AA) composites. The GT is similar to the AFQT except

for exclusion of a speed test. The AA composites are differential (Continued)

DO IFOR" 1473 EDITION, OF OVGS IS OBSOLETE UNCLASSIFIED

U iSECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (whem Date Entered)
UNCLASSIFIED

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE(Whan Date Enlrd)

ARI Technical Report 690

20. (Continued)

aptitude measures and would be expected to provide a better prediction of performance in specific military occupational specialties (MOS). The predictive

ability of each of these composites was analyzed and the results compared.

Job proficiency was measured by the Skill Qualification Tests (SQT).

- The univariate and multivariate statistical methods used in this research

demonstrated that all aptitude measures were significantly related to performance across MOS and skill levels. This is true even when variables measuring

experience and education are included in the analysis. The specific AA composites generally predicted performance better than either AFQT or GT. The

results suggest that, when no MOS-specific performance measures are available,

AA scores are the preferable reenlistment criteria relative to either AFQT or

GT scores.

...

UNCLASSIFIED

iSECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE(0h.n De. EnFIlod)

. i it-A. t
Technical Report 690

An Investigation of Alternatives for Setting

Second-to-Third Tour Reenlistment Standards

Frances C. Grafton and David K. Home

Manpower and Personnel Policy Research Group

Curtis L. Gilroy, Chief

Manpower and Personnel Research Laboratory

Newell K. Eaton, Acting Director

U.S. ARMY RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES

5001 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia 22333-5600

*" Office. Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel

Department of the Army

August 1985

Army Project Number Manpower and Personnel

20263731 A792

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

i%
ARI Research Reports and Technical Reports are intended for Sponsors of

R&D tasks and for other research and military agencies. Any findings ready

for implementation at the time of publication are presented in the last part

of the Brief. Upon completion of a major phase of the task, formal recommendations for official action normally are conveyed to appropriate military

agencies by briefing or Disposition Form.

,'.

6

,5?

2'

iiv

U
FOREWORD

The Manpower and Personnel Policy Research Group of the Army Research

Institute (ARI) performs research on the issues of manpower, personnel, and

training of particular significance to the U.S. Army. This report addresses

the issue of using composites from the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery as reenlistment criteria and was prepared as part of ARI's continuing

support for the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel.

EDGAR M. JOHNSON

Technical Director

_JV

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :.:: - :.-. - ;:--'*.. : * :;; ;:: .k ';:> *- : ;:< -:-::::.: :.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are Statistician and Economist, respectively, in the Manpower

and Personnel Policy Research Group. This paper has benefited from discussion

with Karen Mitchell, Curtis L. Gilroy, Captain Thomas Daula, and Captain Jeffrey

Anderson. Cynthia Rieder provided valuable research assistance. The views expressed here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent

those of aforementioned individuals, the U.S. Army, or the Department of Defense.

gv

.°* * ** * . . . . . . .

" /I I * ~ I*~I . ...
AN INVESTIGATION OF ALTERNATIVES FOR SETTING SECOND-TO-THIRD ""OUR

REENLISTMENT STANDARDS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Requirement:

- The Army is selective about who is permitted to reenlist after any tour of

duty. Soldiers who reenlist will normally be given more complex job tasks, as

well as supervisory responsibilities. The role of the reenlistment criteria is

to select those soldiers who will perform adequately in higher level assignments. The Skill Qualification Test (SQT) gives an index of future performance

based on past and present performance. When SQT scores are unavailable, or the

soldier is applying to a new MOS, a measure of aptitude may be used as an alter-

- native reenlistment criterion. This paper compares the predictive ability of

several measures of Job aptitude: the Armed Forces Qualification Test (AFQT),

the General Technical (GT) composite, and the specific Aptitude Area (AA)

composite.

Procedure:

The predictive ability of each of the three composites was estimated and

compared using both univariate and multivariate statistical methods. Each composite was correlated with the SQT score. The differences between correlations

were tested for significance for each MOS and skill level. The multivariate

methods included a variety of regression techniques. Ordinary least squares,

instrumental variables (to correct for the classical errors-in-variable problem), and logit regression equations were estimated for each analysis sample.

Additional independent variables included measures of experience, education,

and sex.

Findings:

The univariate correlations were generally highest for the AA composites.

The differences were often statistically significant, as indicated in Appendix A.

The three regression methods, as well, found all three aptitude measures to be

statistically significant after holding all other variables constant. In most

cases the effect of AA was greater than that of GT or AFQT, and the R2 was normally higher as well. The finding that the AA composite is the better predictor

of MOS performance was consistent across all techniques.

Utilization of Findings:

The results of the research suggest that the MOS-specific Aptitude Area

composite is the better alternative reenlistment criterion. Although AA predicts Job proficiency as measured by SQT score more accurately than either AFQT

or GT, current Army policy uses GT to select soldiers for reenlistment when SQT

vii

-oS . . . . ,°. . . . . . ... . . .. . .
scores are unavailable. Replacing the GT score with an AA score criterion would

most likely lead to a higher average level of job performance in the Army.

.v

4

I
AN INVESTIGATION OF ALTERNATIVES FOR SETTING SECOND-TO-THIRD TOUR

REENLISTMENT STANDARDS

CONTENTS

Page

INTRODUCTION ............ ............................... . i. 1

REENLISTMENT CRITERIA . . . . . ................ . . .. 2

PROCEDURES .... .......... . . ................. . . 4

RESULTS . . . . . . ............................ 4

Univariate Model ........................... ............ 4

Multivariate Model.................. . ....... 5

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION...................... 7

REFERENCES .................... . . . . . . . . . . ............. 9

APPENDIX A ................ ................................ A-i

B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BLIST OF TABLES

- Table 1. Availability of SQT scores as of 30 September 1984 .......... 3

ix
AN INVESTIGATION OF ALTERNATIVES FOR SETTING SECOND-TO-THIRD

TOUR REENLISTMENT STANDARDS

INTRODUCTION

Unlike many other large organizations, the Army must select its "middle

management"--the Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) corps--from among those who join

at the lowest entry level. Many individuals who can perform adequately at the

entry and journeyman levels cannot perform successfully when promoted to supervisory positions. Although the Army has a selection and classification system

that is based on many years of both research and experience, the system is designed primarily to select soldiers who can perform successfully in entry and

journeyman positions (paygrades E-1 through E-5). The Army also ieeds a system

to select supervisors, or career NCO, from among its journeyman soldiers. A

-. -third-term soldier must expect to be both a leader and a teacher, and the Army

must be able to select those soldiers who can perform these functions well.

The purpose of this effort is to (I) establish a relationship, if any, between the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) composite test

. scores and second-tour performance, and (2) determine the composites that have

the strongest relationship to performance.

The Army has two primary means of judging an applicant's potential for

successfully completing an enlistment: the applicant's high school diploma

status and scores on the ASVAB.

Research has consistently shown that soldiers who have a high school

diploma upon entering the Army are much more likely to complete successfully

their first enlistment term than are non-high school graduates. High school

diploma status is primarily useful in predicting adaptation to military

service.

The ASVAB is a paper-and-pencil battery of cognitive tests covering both

academic and nonacademic subjects. The battery contains both speed and power

tests, the scores of which are combined in various ways to obtain an Armed

Forces Qualification Test (AFQT) score and 10 composite scores. The AFQT was

implemented originally in 1950, and it has served since that time as a measure

of general trainability. In order to enlist in the Army, an applicant must

--first achieve an AFQT percentile score at or above a specified minimum. Those

* -'" individuals who score below 10 on the AFQT have never been admitted iinto the

Army, while current standards require a minimum AFQT score of 16 for high school

graduates and a minimum of 31 for nongraduates.

In addition to the AFQT, the Army computes nine specific Aptitude Area (AA)

.'.i composites from combinations of ASVAB test scores. These aptitude areas are

Combat (CO), Clerical (CL), Operators/Foods (OF), Electronics (EL), Field/Artillery (FA), General Maintenance (GM), Mechanical Maintenance (MM), Surveillance/

Communications (SC), and Skilled Technical (ST). The Aptitude Area composites

were developed specifically to predict success in initial Army training courses.

Every Army job, or Military Occupational Specialty (MOS), requires a minimum

score on one of the nine aptitude areas as a prerequisite for training in the

MOS. The choice of the relevant aptitude area is related to the general

V 1
dimensions of the MOS, while the minimum required for admittance relates primarily to the technical complexity of the MOS. Current minimum requirements

range from 85 to 120.

An additional composite, General Technical (GT), is also computed from

the ASVAB and is a combination of the Verbal and Arithmetic Reasoning tests of

the ASVAB. This composite of verbal and arithmetic skills is commonly accepted

as a measure of general scholastic ability.

The development of the AFQT and Aptitude Area composite scores has always

focused on the first-tour soldier. Acceptable performance during the first

tour, however, is not necessarily directly related to acceptable performance

as an NCO in the second and succeeding tours. Performing a task one has been

trained to accomplish is not the same as teaching someone how to accomplish a

specific task, nor is accomplishing a task that one is directed to do the same

as deciding who should do which tasks and when they should be done.

REENLISTMENT CRITERIA

The Army is faced with deciding which soldiers, among those who are willing

* to remain upon completion of each enlistment, will continue to perform in a competent and effective manner. The most appropriate criteria upon which to base

this decision, of course, are records of past and present job performance. The

.. Army currently has two operational measures of enlisted job performance: En-

.- listed Efficiency Reports (EER) and Skill Qualification Tests (SQT).

Only those soldiers in grades E-5 and above receive an EER. The first EER

is given 90 days after promotion to E-5 and annually thereafter in most cases.

A weighted average is maintained for soldiers during the time they remain in a

specific paygrade, and a new weighted average is begun upon promotion to the

next higher grade. Unfortunately, EER scores have been prone to "grade inflation" over the years to the extent that almost all weighted averages are at or

near the maximum possible score. As a result, it is impossible to use EER to

discriminate accurately among performance levels.

Skill Qualification Tests became operational in FY77 and replaced MOS proficiency tests r- indicators of job performance. The intent was to develop a

separate SQT every year for each skill level (l through 4) for every MOS. Skill

levels are defined relative to grades: level 1 for E-1 to E-4, level 2 for E-5,

level 3 for E-6, and level 4 for E-7. The SQT for a specific MOS and skill

level is administered on a worldwide basis during a specified time period each

year. Any particular SQT may be used for only 1 year before it is replaced by

a new test. In order to pass any SQT, a soldier must obtain a "GO" score on

60% of the tasks scored. A soldier who obtains a "GO" on 80% of the tasks

tested is considered to be performing proficiently enough to be considered for

promotion. Subject matter experts (SME) in each MOS develop Skill Qualification Tests. These SME develop written items to test proficiency on a variable

percentage of the critical tasks contained in the Soldiers' Manual for that MOS

and skill level. The tests are fielded with a minimum of pretesting.

SQT results across several years demonstrate a wide range of test difficulty. Within any particular year the mean score achieved varies from 30 to

more than 95 across MOS. The percentage of soldiers scoring at or above both

2
60 and 80 on individual SQT varies from zero to 100. The difficulty of SQT appears to be unrelated to either the technical complexity of the MOS or the skill

level being tested. The SQT for a particular skill level within a particular

MOS may be "easy" (i.e., high overall mean score and few soldiers scoring below

60 and/or 80), while the SQT in a different year for the same MOS and skill

level may be "difficult" (i.e., low overall mean score and few individual scores

above 60 or 80).

Despite the differences among various SQT, there is little disagreement

that the scores of soldiers taking a specific SQT accurately reflect differences

in performance. A soldier who scores 80 on a particular SQT generally knows and

performs his or her job better than a soldier who scores 50 on the same SQT (although this individual may or may not perform better than a soldier who receives

a score of 50 on a different SQT).

The lack of an equivalent score scale for various SQT is not the only drawback to using SQT as the sole reenlistment standard for soldiers in their second

tour and beyond. An additional problem is the paucity of SQT scores on official

files. Table 1 shows the availability of SQT scores on the Enlisted Master File

for all soldiers serving in pay grades E-5 and E-6 as of 30 September 1984.

Those soldiers having SQT on file are further divided into those who have an

SQT score of 80 and above and those whose SQT score is less than 80. Almost

one fourth of the soldiers in grades E-5 and E-6 have no SQT scores on file.

Table 1

Availability of SQT scores as of 30 September 1984

SQT 2,3 SQT 2 SQT 3

Paygrade No SQT LT 80 GE 80 GE 80 Total

E-5 N 31,644 41,520 28,344 386 101,894

(31) (41) (28) (0)

E-6 N 11,622 36,342 14,145 24,260 86,369

% (14) (42) (16) (28)

Total N 43,266 77,862 42,489 24,646 188,263

(23) (41) (23) (13)

The SQT provides information on an individual's performance in a specific

MOS. If a soldier desires to reenlist in a different MOS, or if no SQT score

is available, an alternative reenlistment standard should exist. In these

cases an ASVAB composite, such as the General Technical or specific Aptitude

Area score, may be used as an alternative. The GT composite has been traditionally used in this role. The use of GT is defended on the basis that soldiers with high general ability either have, or could readily acquire, the

skills necessary to teach and lead the lower grade soldiers under their supervision. The purpose of this analysis is to compare the predictive ability of

3

62
the ASVAB composites, primarily the GT and the specific AA, for performance in

individual MOS.

PROCEDURES

Records for all accessions who entered active duty between 1 January 1976

and 30 September 1980 were matched against files containing skill level 2, 3,

- and 4 SQT scores for 1983 and 1984. The resulting matched cases were sorted

into separate SQT samples by MOS, year, and skill level. When only those samples containing 100 or more cases were retained, the number of analysis samples

was 195; individual sample sizes ranged from 100 to more than 3,000. There

were no skill level 4 SQT samples large enough to be included in the final

set. There are 95 unique MOS among the 195 analysis samples. Appendix A,

Table Al, lists the titles of the MOS included.

The samples were edited prior to analysis. All cases not having test

scores from forms 6 or 7 of the ASVAB as well as those having SQT scores of

zero were deleted from the samples. In addition, all cases with out-of-range

information on any of the variables of interest were also deleted. Because

of these deletions, some samples had less than 100 cases, but final sample

sizes were all over 50. AFQT scores and ASVAB Aptitude Area composite scores

were computed for all cases using the correctly calibrated conversion tables

for ASVAB 6/7 issued in July 1980. The forms 6 and 7 of the ASVAB were used

from January 1976 until October 1980. The computational formulas used are

found in Table A2 of Appendix A.

Two separate approaches were utilized to analyze the data. The first consisted of computing and comparing three univariate models relating AFQT, GT,

and the classification AA composite to SQT performance. The second included

using other variables as well as a GT or an AA composite in a multivariate regression model.

RESULTS

Univariate Method

The correlations between the three ASVAB scores (AFQT, GT, and AA composite) and SQT scores were computed for all samples. Although it is the pri-

*mary selection test for first-term soldiers and has not been considered as an

appropriate basis for setting reenlistment standards, AFQT was included in this

analysis to provide a reference point for use in comparing results obtained

%. with GT and AA scores. Appendix A, Table A3, presents the aptitude composite

" *used for classifying recruits into training, sample size, and the mean AFQT,

GT, AA, and SQT scores for each sample. Samples are ordered by MOS within

aptitude areas. Final sample sizes range from 52 for 1984 skill level 3 SQT

in MOS 31V (Tactical Communications Systems Operator/Mechanic) to 3,659 for

the 1983 skill level 2 SQT in MOS l1B (Infantryman). In general, the skill

level 3 samples are smaller than the skill level 2 samples, while the 1984

samples are smaller than 1983 samples for the same MOS and skill levels.

The correlations between SQT scores and the three ASVAB scores are presented in Appendix A, Table A3. An (*) next to the correlation indicates that

14
the correlation is significantly different from zero at the 95% confidence interval. Some 84% (163 of 195) of the samples show positive significant correlations between GT and SQT, while 96% (186 of 195) show positive significant

correlations between AA and SQT. Only two samples produce negative correlations, and these are not significant.

Preliminary examination of the correlations indicates that for seven of

the nine aptitude areas the aptitude composite scores are more highly correlated with SQT than either GT or AFQT. Both the size of the correlations and

the relatively better predictive power of the Aptitude Area composites over

GT indicate that the use of an aptitude area cutoff score as an alternative

second-tour and beyond reenlistment standard would be quite appropriate for

most Army MOS.

The two apparent exceptions are the Operators/Food and the Clerical aptitude composites, where the highest correlation varies considerably among the

three ASVAB variables. Across all samples using OF, the mean correlations for

AFQT, GT, and AA are .29, .28, and .27, respectively. For samples using CL,

the mean correlations are .32, .30, and .30, respectively.

The computational formulas for the OF and CL aptitude composites of ASVAB

* 6/7, however, are no longer used. Estimates of the ASVAB 8/9/10 OF and CL

composites were computed for the appropriate samples, and the correlation between the new composite and SQT score was derived for each sample. The formulas for the new composites are shown in Table A2 of Appendix A. The new composites are consistently more highly correlated with SQT performance than AFQT,

GT, and the original ASVAB 6/7 composite. The mean correlation for the estimated new OF composite is -35, while the mean correlation is .40 for the new

CL composite. The means of the new composites are presented in Appendix A,

Table A3. For the remainder of the analysis, the new OF or CL composite is

substituted for the original composite.

The AA-SQT correlation for each MOS was compared to the GT-SQT and AFQTSQT correlations, and the difference was tested for statistical significance

(at the 95% confidence interval). Significance is denoted by (@) to the right

of the GT-SQT or AFQT-SQT correlation in Appendix A, Table A3. The AA-SQT

correlation was significantly lower in only one MOS. The single exception was

the 1983 skill level 3 SQT for MOS 13F (Fire Support Specialist) where the

AFQT-SQT correlation exceeded the AA-SQT correlation. The old and new composites for OF and CL were also tested for differences. Significant differences in the correlations (with SQT) are denoted by (*) immediately after the

new composite score.

Multivariate Model

The multivariate model controls for other variables, which may be correlated with the ASVAB composite scores, to measure the contribution of aptitude

to performance (SQT). The additional independent variables included in this

model are education, experience, training, and gender. The regression techniques are designed to measure the specific contribution of each variable to

the SQT score. Statistical methods (instrumental variables) are used in this

analysis to correct for measurement error in the independent variables attributable to the imperfect measurement of aptitude by the ASVAB composites.

-"

.....................
The multivariate analysis is limited to the 1993 SOT results bv each MOS

and skill level (2 and 3) in which the final number of observations exceeds

9q. The following models were estimated for each of the 90 sample:

SQT = BO+BI(AFQT)+B2(EDYRS)+B3(GED)+B4(HSG)+B5(TSERVICE)+B6(SEX)+B7(MOST),

SOT = WO+W 1(AA)+W2 (EDYRS)4W3 (GED)4W4 (HSG)4W5 (TSERVICE)+W6 (SEX)+ 47 (MOST),

SQT = ZO+ZI(AFQT)+Z2(EDYRS)+Z3(GED)+Z4(HSG)+Z5(TSERVICE)+Z6(SEX)+Z7 (OST),

* where

EDYRS is years of education,

GED is general education degree (GED - I with degree),

HSG is high school diploma (HSG - 0 for graduates),

TSERVICE is time (months) in service,

SEX is gender of the individual (sex - n for males), and

MOST indicates whether training occurred in that MOS for which the SOT

was taken (MOST - 1. if same MOS).

The variables in each MOS are identical except for the choice of composite--GT,

AA, or AFQT. The variables are also defined in Appendix B, Table Bl. Each model

was estimated with three regression techniques and yielded approximately 3 x 3 x 90

or 810 equations. The results using alternative regression specifications are

discussed below.

Ordinary Least Squares. Ordinary least squares (OLS) results, as expected,

support the findings of the univariate method in the previous sertion; the

*2L equations that include Aptitude Area scores predict SQT scores best, while the

General Technical equations are the worst predictors. The ranking of R s

indicates that the explanatory power of the AA scores exceeds that of the AFOT

scores, which, in turn, are more powerful than GT scores. The specific OLS

results are not reported in this paper.

The OLS results also indicate that, of all the variables included in the

model, the three composite scores are significant in nearly all MOS and skill

levels. The impact of the composite scores on SQT scores Is large. Each of the

other variables is significant in some of the equations, but not one is as

consistent as the composite scores themselves. Furthermore, the GT-SQT profiles

are less steep than the AA-SQT profiles, as demonstrated by the SQT projections

in Appendix B, Table B2. This fact indicates that the coefficients of the AA

composite in most cases exceed the coefficients of the GT composite. Thus, the

use of CT scores underpredicts the impact of changes in aptitude levels on job

performance.

Instrumental Variables. Since the ASVAB composites are imperfect measures

of job aptitude, the resulting measurement error introduced into the regressions

is likely to bias the OLS estimator. The error-in-variables problem is corrected

-. by using an instrumental variables (IV) technique (see Maddala, 1977, pp. 293-

.* 298). In this case, a Durbin instrument, which is a rank ordering of observations by (each) composite score, is used. The results of the IV regressions

are quite consistent. The IV coefficients of the composites are generally about

10% higher than the OLS coefficients; this fact indicates a negative bias in

the OLS estimates due to the measurement error. The estimates are quite precise,

and the general conclusions of the OLS regressions are still applicable.

6
The equations that include AA predict a greater trade-off between the score

and the SQT performance measure.

Logit Analysis. Another way to model job performance is to analyze the

probability of obtaining a given SQT score. A cutoff score of 80 was chosen

because: (1) this is the level of job performance desired for NCOs; and

(2) there were enough individual scores below 80 to generate a probability

distribution as a function of the independent variables. In many MOS almost

all SQT scores exceed the passing grade of 60, in which case the probability

of passing would be approximately equal to 1.

The probabilities were estimated using a logit regression analysis. The

probability of exceeding the SQT score varies across MOS and skill level, but

the composite scores are significant as determinants of the probabilities in

nearly all samples. Once again, the MOS-specific Aptitude Area scores explain

more variation and demonstrate a greater effect on SQT scores than do the General Technical scores. The logit regression results are consistent with the IV

and OLS results.

Projections of SQT scores are provided in Appendix B, Table B2. The projections illustrate the variations in the SQT scores for different composite

scores, if the other variables are held at their means. The IV equations were

used to generate predicted SQT scores for AA and GT scores of 80, 90, 100, 110,

and 120. AFQT results are not included because AFQT is clearly inappropriate

as a reenlistment criterion, and the difference in scale prevents simple comparison of AFQT results with those of the AA and GT scores. The logit equations

were used to generate the probability of scoring at least 80 on the SQT.

The projections provide a clear demonstration of the relative effects of

AA and GT scores on SQT scores. As the AA and GT scores rise, the SQT scores

rise dramatically. Job aptitude, as measured by these tests, is a significant

predictor of job performance in the Army. Furthermore, the impact of changes

in the AA scores is substantially greater than changes in GT scores.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

There is little doubt that the best predictor of future performance is a

valid measure of current and past performance. It is, therefore, reasonable

that the primary reenlistment criterion be a specific score on a Skill Qualification Test in the same MOS and skill level for which the soldier wishes to reenlist. As Table 1 shows, only 28% of soldiers in grades E-5 and E-6 would be

permitted to reenlist if an SQT score of 80 in an individual's current skill

level were the only means of qualifying for reenlistment. In addition, there

are no data available to support the assumption that acceptable performance in

one MOG is necessarily indicative of acceptable performance in another MOS, and

* many soldiers migrate from one MOG to another at reenlistment. Daula (1981)

notes that almost one third of the soldiers who start in MOG lIB (Infantryman)

migrate to other MOS during their Army careers.

If an additional criterion is to be used for reenlistment purposes, one

should expect a priori that the MOS-related Aptitude Area scores would be bet-

* ter predictors of performance than either GT or AFQT. The aptitude areas are

developed to predict differentially specific job performance (albeit in training),

7
while both GT and AFOT are measures of general ahility. Not only are ASVAR

scores maintained on official Army files, but in-service retesting is available

on a worldwide basis. All composites with the excention of AFQT can he computed

and submitted to the Military Personnel Center (MTLPERCEN) to replace the scores

currently on file.

The data presented in this report support the contention that AA scores are

better at predicting job performance than CT scores. The simple correlations,

*OLS regressions, IV equations, and logit regressions all demonstrate the greater

explanatory power of the AA composites. Furthermore, the impact of the AA

scores on SQT is much greater than the effect of the GT scores. The policy

recommendation that follows from these results is clear: the appropriate

Aptitude Area composite should replace the General Technical composite as an

alternative reenlistment criterion.

The current Army policy of using the GT composite as a reenlistment

criterion is costly in two respects. Some soldiers who could perform well are

denied the opportunity to reenlist, while others who will not perform up to

standard in a new MOS are incorrectly accepted for reenlistment. The overall

level of performance could be compromised by using GT scores rather than AA

scores as a reenlistment criterion.

The optimal predictor of performance, as measured by SOT scores, is the

specific AA composite score. Yet the GT, which is a general composite, has been

a popular reenlistment criterion for all MOS. Several reasons may account for

tr.'s popularity. When only one score cutoff is applied to all MOS, the

criLtrion is easy to remember and simple to apply. In addition, many people

still believe that GT is a measure of general ability or intelligence.

The choice of criteria depends on the objective of the selection process.

The rationale for suggesting that the AA composite is preferable to GT as a

reenlistment criterion is that the AA composite is a better predictor of

performance in specific MOS. The soldier who is promoted to a higher grade

requires both MOS-specific skills and the aptitude to be an effective leader and

instructor. Certainly these composites should not be used to the exclusion of

SQT performance, commanders' evaluations, previous military training, and other

criteria. However, the addition of minimum Aptitude Area scores as an

alternative reenlistment criterion should lead to higher quality soldiers in

each OS after reenlistment.

,8

°..

-,V.,,€ ' ,, , ' " , . ,. . . . . - " . .,. - - . . .,. ,,.. . . ' . ' . ' . . ., ' " , ,., ' i
REFERENCES

Daula, Thomas V. (1981). The retention of first term soldiers--theory and

empirical evidence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts

Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

Maddala, G. S. (1977). Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

V

6

5,

4. 9

r '- - 1 - - S.' |' . .
~APPENfDIX A

S....

41

' - •
Table Al

Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) Titles

OOR RECRUITER

05B RADIO OPERATOR

05C RADIO TELETYPE RADIO OPERATOR

05D ELECTRONIC WARFARE/SIGNAL INTELLIGENCE EMITTER IDE

05H ELECTRONIC WARFARE/SIGNAL INTELLIGENCE INTERCEPTOR

05K ELECTRONIC WARFARE/SIGNAL INTELLIGENCE NON-MORSE

11B INFANTRYMAN

11C INDIRECT FIRE INFANTRYMAN

11H HEAVY ANTIARMOR WEAPONS INFANTRYMAN

12B COMBAT ENGINEER

12C BRIDGE CREWMAN

12E ATOMIC DEMOLITION MUNITIONS SPECIALIST

13B CANNON CREWMAN

13E CANNON FIRE DIRECTION SPECIALIST

13F FIRE SUPPORT SPECIALIST

15D LANCE CREW MEMBER/MLRS SERGEANT

15E PERSHING MISSILE CREW MEMBER

16B HERCULES MISSILE CREW MEMBER

16D HAWK MISSILE CREW MEMBER

16E HAWK FIRE CONTROL CREW MEMBER

16P ADA SHORT RANGE MISSILE CREW4AN

16R ADA SHORT RANGE GUNNERY CREWMAN

16S MANPADS CREWMAN

17K GROUND SURVEILLANCE RADAR CREWMAN

19D CAVALRY SCOUT

19E M48-M60 ARMOR CREWMAN

26Q TACTICAL SATELLITE/MICROWAVE SYSTEMS OPERATOR

27E TOW/DRAGON REPAIRER

31E FIELD RADIO REPAIRER

31J TELETYPEWRITER REPAIRER

A-1
31M MULTICHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATOR

V. 31V TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS OPERATOR/MECHANIC

32D STATION TECHNICAL CONTROLLER

36C WIRE SYSTEMS INSTALLER/OPERATOR

36K AVIONICS MECHANICS

43E PARACHUTE RIGGER

44B METAL WORKER

45K TANK TURRET REPAIRER

45N M6OAI/A3 TANK TURRET MECHANIC

51B RES CARPENTRY AND MASONRY SPECIALIST-SAW

51H CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER SUPERVISOR

52D POWER GENERATION EQUIPMENT REPAIRER

54E NBC SPECIALIST

55B AMMUNITION SPECIALIST

55D EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL SPECIALIST

55G NUCLEAR WEAPONS MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST

57H CARGO SPECIALIST

62B CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT REPAIRER

62E HEAVY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT OPERATOR

63B LIGHT VEHICLE/POWER GENERATION MECHANIC

63D SELF-PROPELLED FIELD ARTILLERY SYSTEM MECHANIC

63G FUEL AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS REPAIRER

63H TRACK VEHICLE REPAIRER

63N M6OA1/A3 TANK SYSTEM MECHANIC

63S HEAVY WHEEL VEHICLE MECHANIC

63T ITV/IFV/CFV SvSTEM MECHANIC

63W WHEEL VEHICLE REPAIRER

' 63Y TRACK VEHICLE MECHANIC

64C MOTOR TRANSPORT OPERATOR

68J AIRCRAFT FIRE CONTROL REPAIRER

S•71C SECRETARY

71D LEGAL CLERK

71L ADMINISTRATIVE SPECIALIST

71M CHAPEL ACTIVITIES SPECIALIST

A-2

46I
71P FLIGHT OPERATION COORDINATOR

" 72E COMBAT TELECOM CENTER OPERATOR

73C FINANCE SPECIALIST

73D ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST

74D COMPUTER/MACHINE OPERATOR

74F PROGRAMMER/ANALYST

75B PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION SPECIALIST

75C PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST

75D PERSONNEL RECORDS SPECIALIST

75E PERSONNEL ACTIONS SPECIALIST

75F PERSONNEL INFO SYSTEM MGT SPECIALIST

76C EQUIPMENT RECORDS AND PARTS SPECIALIST

76P MATERIEL CONTROL AND ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST

76V MATERIEL STORAGE AND HANDLING SPECIALIST

76W PETROLEUM SUPPLY SPECIALIST

76Y UNIT SUPPLY SPECIALIST

82C FIELD ARTILLERY SURVEYOR

91C PRACTICAL NURSE

91E DENTAL SPECIALIST

91P X-RAY SPECIALIST

91Q PHARMACY SPECIALIST

91R VETERINARY SPECIALIST

92B MEDICAL LABORATORY SPECIALIST

93H AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER OPERATOR

93J AIR TRAFFIC RADAR CONTROLLER

94B FOOD SERVICE SPECIALIST

95B MILITARY POLICE

95C CORRECTIONAL SPECIALIST

. 96B INTELLIGENCE ANALYST

* 98C ELECTRONIC WARFARE/SIGNAL INTELLIGENCE A

98G ELECTRONIC WARFARE/SIGNAL INTELLIGENCE V

-pA-3

.3
'V.

Table A2

Sample Sizes and Means

Skill Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean

MOS Year Lvl AA N AFQT CT Old AA New AA SQT

71C 83 2 CL 83 55.4 107.7 112.6 106.5 65.6

71D 83 2 CL 411 57.5 108.2 111.8 107.6 66.4

71D 84 2 CL 90 57.8 108.5 112.0 108.7 73.2

71L 83 2 tL 1418 46.7 100.8 104.9 100.4 59.6

71L 83 3 CL 76 61.6 110.3 113.4 109.7 64.1

71L 84 2 CL 1760 45.2 99.9 104.5 99.4 74.2

73C 83 2 CL 372 55.7 106.3 109.5 107.3 81.6

73C 84 2 CL 486 54.8 105.7 109.7 107.1 73.2

7 5B 83 2 CL 926 40.9 96.7 101.7 96.9 65.1

75B 84 2 CL 1024 40.2 96.2 101.5 96.5 72.5

75C 83 2 CL 233 50.8 103.5 107.5 103.1 72.8

-, 75C 84 2 CL 273 51.4 104.2 108.3 103.9 65.4

, 75D 83 2 CL 337 45.3 99.8 103.0 99.4 67.3

75D 84 2 CL 319 45.4 99.7 103.3 99.8 72.8

75E 83 2 CL 94 48.6 102.1 106.7 101.6 70.0

- 75E 84 2 CL 116 45.1 100.0 105.1 100.2 69.8

*'" 75F 83 2 CL 168 45.2 100.0 105.1 99.3 71.0

75F 84 2 CL 183 44.1 99.9 105.0 99.6 76.9

76C 83 2 CL 394 36.6 93.5 97.6 93.6 72.5

76C 84 2 CL 757 31.0 89.6 94.7 90.0 80.7

76P 83 2 CL 317 37.0 93.8 98.1 94.2 59.5

76P 83 3 CL 58 46.8 101.7 105.8 100.4 67.9

76V 83 2 CL 362 33.0 90.2 93.1 90.2 64.6

76V 84 2 CL 481 30.7 88.3 91.5 88.7 71.9

76W 83 2 CL 231 27.6 86.0 87.9 86.4 71.4

76W 84 2 CL 193 24.7 83.2 85.5 84.3 66.1

76Y 83 2 CL 1352 42.2 98.4 102.5 97.1 82.4

76Y 83 3 CL 439 48.3 101.1 104.2 99.5 80.9

76Y 84 2 CL 345 37.8 95.4 100.7 93.7 73.8

76Y 84 3 CL 202 43.9 98.6 102.1 97.5 80.3

11B 83 2 CO 3659 40.8 93.1 94.9 70.1

11B 83 3 CO 1258 46.7 97.7 97.4 70.2

11B 84 2 CO 1090 40.3 92.4 94.8 67.3

11B 84 3 CO 643 44.9 96.2 96.3 74.4

11C 83 2 CO 1060 36.2 90.1 91.3 70.0

1IC 83 3 CO 93 62.0 108.2 104.1 74.1

11C 84 2 CO 278 35.2 89.2 91.7 72.2

* ** 11C 84 3 CO 56 54.7 103.1 101.3 80.9

11H 83 2 CO 659 41.7 93.8 95.8 70.7

1H 83 3 CO 106 43.7 95.1 93.8 70.1

11H 84 2 CO 173 40.6 92.7 94.8 72.7

11H 84 3 CO 64 39.9 91.7 92.2 74.4

12B 83 2 CO 1155 40.2 92.8 95.4 87.6

12B 83 3 CO 294 53.7 102.8 102.0 90.1

12B 84 2 CO 430 37.3 90.6 93.6 67.3

O:A-4

i . " *. "v -"- ." " " , .-" - . "-" f "'= , , "."- ," . .... - ..... . . . . . .- - . A
Skill Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean

MOS Year Lvl AA N AFQT GT Old AA New AA SQT

12B 84 3 CO 211 46.9 97.8 99.9 65.3

12C 83 2 CO 195 40.0 92.5 95.0 88.4

12E 83 2 Cc 117 56.4 103.6 103.8 92.6

19D 83 2 CO 869 41.0 93.4 95.6 65.2

19D 83 3 CO 262 47.4 99.6 97.9 71.2

19D 84 2 CO 238 36.9 90.5 92.5 67.6

19D 84 3 CO 127 45.3 98.4 97.3 74.6

19E 83 2 CO 1817 39.8 92.4 94.9 72.2

19E 83 3 CO 420 47.1 98.3 97.7 69.9

17K 83 2 EL 126 49.2 99.5 100.9 79.5

26Q 83 2 EL 158 42.0 94.4 101.1 80.9

26Q 84 2 EL 118 37.4 91.8 97.8 73.5

27E 83 2 EL 84 42.9 94.0 102.7 85.1

27E 84 2 EL 118 39.6 93.3 100.9 92.2

31E 83 2 EL 148 42.8 95.1 100.6 80.9

31J 83 2 EL 75 43.0 95.2 98.8 77.6

31J 84 2 EL 112 39.6 93.4 97.0 81.7

31', 83 2 EL 639 33.0 88.9 92.8 81.7

31M 84 2 EL 762 30.8 86.8 91.7 75.5

31V 83 2 EL 205 43.0 95.9 102.8 81.1

31V 83 3 EL 126 56.6 105.2 108.3 73.9

31V 84 2 EL 110 38.2 92.4 101.9 81.6

31V 84 3 EL 52 50.8 100.8 104.4 77.5

32D 83 2 EL 116 58.8 106.4 109.1 75.6

36C 83 2 EL 323 31.1 87.2 90.4 69.5

36K 83 2 EL 285 31.2 87.2 91.7 74.5

36K 84 2 EL 296 29.0 84.8 90.2 74.2

13B 83 2 FA 1780 32.1 88.8 93.5 73.1

13B 83 3 FA 305 38.7 92.7 97.3 78.4

13B 84 2 FA 1786 30.5 87.4 92.4 77.9

13B 84 3 FA 615 35.8 91.1 96.3 84.1

13F 83 2 FA 447 49.9 101.0 107.3 74.3

13F 83 3 FA 127 55.9 105.2 107.7 73.8

13F 84 2 FA 90 46.6 97.8 106.9 73.8

13F 84 3 FA 94 51.3 103.1 106.2 78.3

43E 83 2 GM 149 43.1 94.8 97.1 88.9

" 43E 84 2 GM 154 42.5 94.5 96.1 71.4

44B 83 2 GM 74 39.2 92.7 95.9 77.4

44B 84 2 GM 156 37.0 91.3 94.2 60.6

45K 84 2 GM 90 44.8 96.2 101.3 56.9

51B 83 2 GM 153 42.1 96.1 95.7 83.2

51B 84 2 GM 206 40.2 93.6 95.0 60.8

51H 84 3 GM 73 47.4 99.2 101.0 62.7

52D 84 2 GM 141 43.7 97.1 101.1 63.3

55B 83 2 GM 156 32.1 89.8 88.1 63.8

55D 83 2 GM 121 71.3 113.8 114.8 81.3

55D 84 2 GM 137 70.0 113.3 114.1 89.0

A-5

-----------------... . . .
Skill Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean

MOS Year LvI AA N AFQT GT Old AA New AA SQT

55G 84 3 GM 60 57.1 105.8 105.0 77.4

57H 83 2 GM 112 32.2 89.5 87.9 69.6

57H 84 2 GM 154 29.1 86.9 85.4 62.4

62E 83 2 GM 247 41.2 94.8 99.2 71.8

68J 83 2 GM 67 51.7 100.8 104.5 86.6

45N 84 2 MM 99 35.8 91.8 96.6 80.0

62B 84 2 MM 290 38.7 92.1 100.3 73.1

63B 83 2 MM 1752 35.9 89.7 98.6 83.3

63B 83 3 MM 109 48.4 99.9 109.4 66.9

63B 84 2 MM 2592 34.0 88.4 96.8 74.0

63D 83 2 MM 113 39.8 92.3 103.3 90.9

63D 84 2 MM 151 37.3 90.5 101.4 79.4

63C 84 2 MT! 80 28.9 84.6 90.5 47.8

63H 83 2 MM 299 38.1 91.1 99.2 79.4

63H 83 3 MM 131 47.3 97.3 105.1 57.1

63H 84 2 MM 354 35.2 89.5 96.7 59.4

63N 83 2 DM 219 41.3 94.4 103.7 78.1

63N 83 3 MN 88 42.9 93.8 104.0 74.1

63N 84 2 MM 260 36.6 90.4 100.9 75.2

63S 83 2 MM 107 35.5 88.8 98.4 93.5

63S 84 2 MIM 197 35.6 89.3 98.3 66.9

63T 84 2 MM 305 35.3 89.1 100.5 71.5

63W 83 2 MM 220 34.6 90.0 98.1 89.9

63W 84 2 MM 247 33.4 88.2 96.7 51.4

63Y 83 2 MM 128 37.5 91.4 102.0 93.3

63Y 84 2 MM 185 36.1 89.8 101.4 66.2

15D 83 2 OF 166 38.8 92.7 102.7 95.5 77.9

15D 84 2 OF 143 37.2 91.0 100.7 93.3 72.3

15E 83 2 OF 210 37.9 91.9 101.2 94.6 61.8

16B 83 2 OF 87 30.6 87.2 91.7 88.4 86.7

16D 83 2 OF 169 30.3 86.9 93.0 87.0 92.0

16D 84 2 OF 259 28.6 85.3 91.5 87.0 73.2

16E 83 2 OF 107 41.3 94.3 105.1 96.5 82.5

16E 84 2 OF 166 40.6 93.6 104.1 96.0 71.4

16E 84 3 OF 59 51.0 100.6 110.6 103.0 74.0

16P 84 2 OF 190 26.8 82.3 91.2 84.3 62.2

16P 84 3 OF 84 39.2 91.9 97.9 92.7 72.8

16R 84 2 OF 243 27.5 83.7 92.3 86.2 69.1

16R 84 3 OF 81 39.2 92.4 97.7 93.1 72.8

16S 84 2 OF 256 28.0 83.7 92.8 86.0 68.2

16S 84 3 OF 126 37.5 91.5 98.2 93.6 64.9

64C 83 2 OF 1254 36.0 90.6 96.8 92.6 84.9

64C 83 3 OF 74 54.5 103.4 109.6 105.5 82.7

64C 84 2 OF 2090 33.8 89.2 95.3 91.1 77.5

64C 84 3 OF 102 49.1 99.1 105.5 101.2 72.8

94B 83 2 OF 131 46.5 98.7 102.6 96.0 78.0

94B 83 3 OF 1287 31.8 87.9 91.4 87.0 70.1

A-6

~ ."P"'-%{JL' ~ '," ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W- - " ' , -" ,'.,.," - "r% . -. "- . . . . .
Skill Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean

MOS Year Lvl AA N AFQT GT Old AA New AA SQT

05B 83 2 SC 378 53.4 103.6 101.8 83.9

05C 83 2 SC 893 40.6 94.2 91.9 72.9

05C 84 2 SC 519 41.3 94.6 92.7 75.5

05C 84 3 SC 132 44.8 96.5 94.0 72.8

05H 83 2 SC 346 64.3 111.3 107.4 86.3

05H 84 2 SC 266 60.7 108.8 105.2 87.4

72E 83 2 SC 587 36.8 92.1 88.9 77.5

OOR 84 3 ST 118 61.7 109.3 106.5 75.0

05D 83 2 ST 84 67.8 113.5 113.3 83.1

05K 83 2 ST 124 65.9 112.5 112.9 80.4

05K 84 2 ST 126 63.2 110.4 111.9 82.4

13E 83 2 ST 212 52.8 102.8 105.8 58.5

13E 83 3 ST 87 59.9 108.3 109.5 70.9

13E 84 2 ST 156 47.9 99.7 104.2 54.8

13E 84 3 ST 86 61.1 107.9 109.6 70.1

54E 83 2 ST 716 43.8 97.8 101.1 72.4

54E 83 3 ST 231 54.1 104.7 105.4 71.0

71P 84 2 ST 102 43.1 97.6 100.0 73.6

73D 83 2 ST 81 60.3 109.7 111.0 67.2

73D 84 2 ST 81 60.2 110.1 111.2 69.4

74D 83 2 ST 214 53.0 103.8 106.4 78.0

- 74D 84 2 ST 132 51.6 103.5 105.4 70.9

74F 83 2 ST 172 66.7 112.4 115.6 79.6

74F 83 3 ST 71 70.3 114.8 116.5 76.2

82C 83 2 ST 252 46.2 98.0 102.8 58.6

82C 83 3 ST 56 63.1 108.1 108.7 67.0

91C 83 3 ST 262 61.3 110.0 109.7 86.5

91C 84 3 ST 408 59.4 109.1 110.1 82.8

91E 83 2 ST 216 47.6 100.3 103.5 90.9

91E 84 2 ST 337 46.4 99.8 102.4 74.7

91P 83 2 ST 144 52.0 102.8 107.4 88.3

91Q 83 2 ST 179 58.7 108.2 112.6 92.0

91Q 84 2 ST 188 58.8 108.5 112.2 83.0

91R 83 2 ST 104 54.6 105.9 108.1 90.2

91R 84 2 ST 173 51.4 103.5 106.6 74.5

92B 83 2 ST 104 65.5 113.1 116.0 93.7

92B 84 2 ST 154 60.6 110.6 113.8 77.3

93H 83 2 ST 112 56.4 106.2 107.9 82.8

93H 84 2 ST 103 54.8 104.6 108.2 83.5

93H 84 3 ST 57 59.3 108.4 110.5 85.0

93J 83 2 ST 87 59.4 107.0 108.2 85.2

93J 84 2 ST 120 60.0 107.2 108.2 80.3

95B 83 2 ST 1324 56.7 106.1 106.8 86.1

95B 83 3 ST 169 71.0 115.4 111.8 86.4

95B 84 2 ST 1190 52.6 103.2 105.6 81.3

95B 84 3 ST 215 66.5 112.4 109.3 82.1

95C 83 2 ST 199 35.9 91.5 92.3 90.0

95C 84 2 ST 216 33.5 90.0 90.8 87.2

96B 84 2 ST 232 58.5 107.2 108.8 72.8

96B 84 3 ST 220 63.0 109.5 108.5 76.5

A-7

L,"%
Skill Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean

MOS Year Lvl AA N AFQT CT Old AA New AA SQT

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

98C 83 2 ST 311 75.7 117.8 119.9 74.5

98C 83 3 ST 80 75.7 118.2 119.2 72.1

98C 84 2 ST 311 76.3 117.6 119.4 80.2

, 98C 84 3 ST 146 77.5 119.4 119.4 81.4

98G 83 2 ST 252 83.2 122.7 123.0 80.2

98G 83 3 ST 98 82.8 122.5 124.1 78.1

A-8

~X4i
Table A3

Correlation between SQT and Various ASVAB Scores

with Associated Tests of Significance

Ski r r r r MOS Year Lvl AA AFQT GT Old AA New AA

71C 83 2 CL .36 .24*@ .20* •35*

71D 83 2 CL -41@ .38*@ .36* •45*

71D 84 2 CL .26 .30* •30* .34

71L 83 2 CL .38@ .35*@ .36* .43*

71L 83 3 CL .25@ .22 @ .28* .36

71L 84 2 CL .36@ .35*@ •34* •43*

73C 83 2 CL .46@ •44*@ •39* .52*

73C 84 2 CL .42@ .43*@ .38* .50*

75B 83 2 CL •42@ .39*@ .39* •47*

75B 84 2 CL .35@ .34*@ .32* •43*

75C 83 2 CL .42@ .40*@ .36* .50*

75C 84 2 CL .46@ .44*@ .43* .53*

75D 83 2 CL .40@ .40*@ •40* •51*

75D 84 2 CL .38@ .40*@ .42* .51*

75E 83 2 CL •37@ .33*@ •37* .50*

75E 84 2 CL .30@ .28*@ .32* .42*

75F 83 2 CL .29@ .26*@ .28* •41*

75F 84 2 CL -43@ .46*@ .40* •54*

76C 83 2 CL .21 .14*@ .12* .24*

76C 84 2 CL .25@ .24*@ .19* .33*

76P 83 2 CL .28@ .26*@ .30* .35

76P 83 3 CL .04 .10 .13 .17

76V 83 2 CL .28@ .27*@ .31* .32

76V 84 2 CL .19@ .16*@ .17* .24*

76W 83 2 CL .16 .08 @ .11* .17

76W 84 2 CL .27@ .18* .20* .30*

76Y 83 2 CL .24@ .23*@ .22* .29*

76Y 83 3 CL .33 •33* .31* •36*

76Y 84 2 CL .22@ .23*@ .14* .32*

76Y 84 3 CL .35@ .27* .21* -34*

11B 83 2 CO .54 •53* .54*

1IB 83 3 CO .48 .47* .48*

An (*) next to GT/SQT, AA/SQT correlation indicates correlation

* is significantly different from zero. An (@) indicates that the

AFQT-SQT or GT-SQT correlation is significantly different from the

AA-SQT correlation. An (*) next to the old AA Score indicates that

it is significantly different from the new AA Scores. The AFQT-SQT

correlations were not tested for significance.

•A.

@1 A-9

'l 

•

m +" N "+ . "+ " '+ -"" .+ • % +. .*I "+ m. . ° +. "+ . ++ q. u " '+ ' "+ ". + " + - " '+ ' . . . + " •

.
Skl r r r 

r

MOS Year Lvl AA AFQT GT Old AA New AA

11B 84 2 CO .43 .43* .45*

11B 84 3 CO .28 .29* .30*

11C 83 2 CO .45 .43* .44*

11C 83 3 CO .40 .42* .40*

11C 84 2 CO .34 .34* .37*

11C 84 3 CO .48 .41* .39*

11H 83 2 CO .51 .51* .48*

11H 83 3 CO .41 .36* .43*

11H 84 2 CO .36 .38* .37*

11H 84 3 CO .30 .23 .37*

12B 83 2 CO .24 .25* .22*

12B 83 3 CO .26 .38* .35*

12B 84 2 CO .47 .45* .43*

12B 84 3 CO .48 .47* .44*

12C 83 2 CO .30 .28* .34*

. 12E 83 2 CO .23 .17 @ .35*

19D 83 2 CO .51 .46* .50*

0 19D 83 3 CO .37 .36* .42*

19D 84 2 CO .50 .49* .47*

19D 84 3 CO .43 .42* .39*

19E 83 2 CO .38 .37*@ .40*

19E 83 3 CO .31@ .32*@ •39*

17K 83 2 EL .16 .15 .19*

26Q 83 2 EL .47 .46* .50*

26Q 84 2 EL .36@ .33*@ .64*

27E 83 2 EL .38 .58* .45*

27E 84 2 EL .43 .46* •49*

31E 83 2 EL .39 .41* .34*

31J 83 2 EL .49 .44* .45*

31J 84 2 EL .39 .40* .46*

31M 83 2 EL .25@ .21"@ .39*

31M 84 2 EL .27@ .26*@ .35*

31V 83 2 EL .12@ .16*@ .30*

31V 83 3 EL .48@ .46*@ .58*

31V 84 2 EL .23 .29* .30*

31V 84 3 EL .31 .16 @ .47*

32D 83 2 EL .46 .45* .38*

36C 83 2 EL .25 .23*@ .33*

36K 83 2 EL .38 .34" .37*

36K 84 2 EL .33@ .28*@ .42*

13B 83 2 FA .31 .27*@ .33*

13B 83 3 FA .28 .27*@ .34*

13B 84 2 FA .22 .19@ .21*

13B 84 3 FA .29 .25* .34*

13F 83 2 FA .42 .40* .40*

13F 83 3 FA .43@* .39* .33* 13F 84 2 FA .40 .36* .34*

A-10
Skl r r r r

MOS Year Lvl AA AFQT CT Old AA New AA

13F 84 3 FA .30 .32* .24*

43E 83 2 GM -.09 -.09 -.04

43E 84 2 CM .21 .21* .27*

44B 83 2 GM .30 .31* .25*

44B 84 2 GM .32@ .33*@ .50*

45K 84 2 GM .22 .17 .24"

51B 83 2 GM .34@ .29*@ .44*

51B 84 2 GM .43@ .35*@ .52*

51H 84 3 GM .31 .35* .29*

52D 84 2 GM .11@ .05 @ .33*

55B 83 2 GM .27 .26* .32*

55D 83 2 GM -.01 .03 -.02

55D 84 2 GM .19@ .27* .32*

550 84 3 GM .37 .31* .29*

57H 83 2 GM .08 .05 .15

57H 84 2 GM .06 .10 .17*

62E 83 2 GM .26 .22*@ .31*

68J 83 2 GM .14 .12 @ .28*

45N 84 2 LMM .30 .25* .38*

62B 84 2 MM .37@ .37*@ .60*

63B 83 2 MM .21@ .19*@ .29*

63B 83 3 MM .35 .26*@ .41*

63B 84 2 MM .42@ .41*@ .57*

63D 83 2 MM .14@ .17 .30*

63D 84 2 MM .50@ .51"@ .62*

630 84 2 MMI .54 .48*@ .65*

63H 83 2 MM .26 .27* .28*

63H 83 2 MM .29 .26*@ .40*

63H 84 2 MM .52@ .52*@ .66*

63N 83 2 MM .30 .31* .34*

63N 83 3 Mm .39@ -33*@ .62*

63N 84 2 MM .30@ .29*@ .46*

63S 83 2 MM .15 .18 .27*

63S 84 2 fM .45 .43* .52*

63T 84 2 MM .36 .34* .40*

63W 83 2 MM .26 .27* .32*

63W 84 2 M .47@ .46*@ .61*

63Y 83 2 MM .17 .08 .18*

63Y 84 2 MM .45@ .45*@ .55*

15D 83 2 OF .35 .31* .30* .36

15D 84 2 OF .34 .33* .16* .36*

15E 83 2 OF .23@ .25*@ .27* .36

16B 83 2 OF .20 .17 .27* .25

16D 83 2 OF .05@ .04 @ .20* .23

16D 84 2 OF .27@ .19*@ .30* .36

16E 83 2 OF .20@ .20*@ .30* .33

16E 84 2 OF .46@ .43*@ .41* .58*

A-Il
Skl r r r r

MOS Year Lvl AA AFQT GT Old AA New AA

16E 84 3 OF .28 .24 .25* .28

16P 84 2 OF .26@ .32* .27* .38*

16P 84 3 OF .33 .31* .26* .32

16R 84 2 OF .29 .27*@ .25* .36*

16R 84 3 OF .46 .43* .28* .40*

16S 84 2 OF .30 .24* .16* .30*

16S 84 3 OF .42 .43* .43* .47

64C 83 2 OF .20@ .20*@ .22* .27*

64C 83 3 OF .25 .24 .08 .21

64C 84 2 OF .29@ .27*@ .30* .38*

64C 84 3 OF .21 .17 .14* .23

94B 83 2 OF .37 .44* .31* .37

94B 83 3 OF .29@ .29*@ .26* •37*

05B 83 2 SC .19@ .15*@ .28*

05C 83 2 SC .26 .24*@ .27*

05C 84 2 SC .29@ .28*@ .32*

05C 84 3 SC .29@ .27*@ .36*

05H 83 2 SC .48 .46* .49*

05H 84 2 SC •37 •34* .37*

72E 83 2 SC .14@ .09 @ .19*

OOR 84 3 ST .30 .21*@ .34*

05D 83 2 ST .42 .41* •47*

05K 83 2 ST .07@ .04 @ .18*

05K 84 2 ST .24@ .23*@ .38*

13E 83 2 ST .37 .33* .38*

13E 83 3 ST .29@ .21* .33*

13E 84 2 ST .47 .42* •47*

13E 84 3 ST .48 •43* .43*

54E 83 2 ST .39 .39* .43*

54E 83 3 ST .49@ .46*@ .59*

71P 84 2 ST .21@ .25*@ •36*

73D 83 2 ST .14@ .16 @ .42*

73D 84 2 ST .20 .18 @ .31*

74D 83 2 ST .19 .20* .21*

74D 84 2 ST .41 .46* .45*

74F 83 2 ST .42 .42* .36*

74F 83 3 ST .25 .30* .38*

82C 83 2 ST .38 .35* .40*

4 820 83 3 ST .35 .24 .29*

91C 83 3 ST .20 .15*@ .23*

910 84 3 ST .25@ .25@ .35*

91E 83 2 ST .29 .25*@ .34*

91E 84 2 ST .26 .22*@ .30*

91P 83 2 ST .11 .06 .12

4 91Q 84 2 ST .27 .24* .30*

91R 83 2 ST .44 .40* •44*

91R 84 2 ST .43 .40* .43*

[A-,

a A- 12

. . . . . . . .... . .-.... . . . . . . . ......--... 
Skl r r r r

MOS Year Lvl AA AFQT GT Old AA New AA

92B 83 2 ST .22@ .26*@ .46*

92B 84 2 ST .26 .29* -33*

93H 83 2 ST .24 .22 .18

93H 84 2 ST .28@ .24*@ .39*

93H 84 3 ST .44 .55* .53*

93J 83 2 ST .14 .21* .23*

93J 84 2 ST .22 .22* .24*

95B 83 2 ST .28@ .29*@ .33*

95B 83 3 ST .30 .34* .37*

95B 84 2 ST .35 .34* .36*

95B 84 3 ST .30 .29*@ .36*

95C 83 2 ST .04 .03 .02

95C 84 2 ST .27 .27* .22*

96B 84 2 ST .50 .53* .53*

96B 84 3 ST .46@ .47*@ .54*

98C 83 2 ST .31 .32* .27*

98C 83 3 ST .30@ .34*@ .43*

87 84 2 ST .30 .32* .30

98C 84 3 ST .20@ .27* .32*

98G 83 2 ST .29@ .30*@ -43*

98G 83 3 ST .23 .16 @ .31*

A-13
.I4

.*o.
TABLE B1

Variable Definitions for Table B2

SYMBOL ____VARIABLE

Composite GT or AA composite

Ed-Yrs Years of Education

GED General educational Degree (none-0)

HSG High school graduate (graduate=0)

Ser-Time Time (months) in service

Sex Sex (male=0)

Train-MOS SQT: MOS same as training MOS (different0O)

* Indicates the variable is significant at the

.10 level

Indicates significance at the .05 level

B- 1

.*-A
TABLE B2

###############################################################################

M 0 S 71D ######################################################################## #######

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .37** .08** 80 55.9831 0.002

Ed-Yrs -.52 -.01 90 59.6831 0.005

" Ged -2.14 -.46 100 63.3831 0.011

Hsg -.78 -7.71 110 67.0831 0.025

Ser-Time .16* .02** 120 70.7831 0.053

Sex -.55 .15

Train-Mos 2.87** .47

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CL)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .44** .07** 80 53.1315 0.002

Ed-Yrs -.28 .06 90 57.5315 0.005

Ced -3.19 -.39 100 61.9315 0.010

Hsg .34 -7.69 110 66.3315 0.020

Ser-Time .16** .02* 120 70.7315 0.0319

Sex -1.59 -.15

Train-Mos 2.32** .45

#################################################################### l ~fF!-,," 

M 0 S 71L ##################################################################### p-ri # i

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS ]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOG7T

Composite .33** .04** 80 53.0058 0.016

Ed-Yrs -.03 -.02 90 56.3058 0.023

Ged 1.81 .23 100 59.6058 0.034

Hsg -1.31 -. 19 110 62.9058 0.05

Ser-Time .02 -.01 120 66.2058 0.073

Sex 1.51* .03

Train-Mos .91 -.09

B-2

p',M

i ; ,-> ' .. ...... ...... ......--. '// --- --
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CL)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .37** .05** 80 50.3995 0.018

Ed-Yrs .01 -.01 90 54.0995 0.030

Ged 1.55 .22 100 57.7995 0.049

Hsg -.44 -.10 110 61.4995 0.07B

Ser-Time .04 -.01 120 65.1995 0.122

Sex 1.03 -.05

Train-Mos .27 -.15

############################################################################ ##

M 0 S 71M I ##############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

4 VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .36** .08** 80 71.6819 0.125

Ed-Yrs -.51 .11 90 75.2819 0.242

Ged -10.93* -1.93 100 78.8819 0.415

Hsg 2.58 .30 110 82.4819 0.613

Ser-Time -.01 .01 120 86.0819 0.779

Sex 5.58** 1.21**

" Train-Mos 1.77 .52

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CL)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .22** .06** 80 75.0267 0.327

Ed-Yrs -.08 .16 90 77.2267 0.469

Ged -9.41 -1.28 100 79.4267 0.617

Hsg 4. .42 110 81.6267 0.746

Ser-Time .01 .02 120 83.8267 0.842

Sex 4.41* .96

Train-Mos 4.37* .80

B-3

., .--. .. .*. ... , . -... - . .. .. . . .. .. , .. -.
#############################################################################

M 0 S 73C ###############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .25** .05** 80 74.6267 0.214

Ed-Yrs .21 -.06 90 77.1267 0.310

Ged 1.13 .36 100 79.6267 0.426

Hsg 1.13 -.15 110 82.1267 0.550

Ser-Time .04 .01 120 84.6267 0.669

Sex -1.15 -.29

Train-Mos 5.86** 1.29**

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CL)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .23** .05** 80 75.4517 0.352

Ed-Yrs .32 -.04 90 77.7517 0.473

Ged 1.5 .43 100 80.0517 0.597

Hsg 1.25 -.13 110 82.3517 0.709

Ser-Time .05 .01 120 84.6517 0.801

Sex -1.49 -.34

Train-Mos 6.04** 1.26*

########################################################################### p'-,

M 0 S 75B #######################################################################fff#f#

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .38** .08** 80 58.2154 0.035

Ed-Yrs .39 .17* 90 62.0154 0.075

Ged -4.43** -.64 100 65.8154 0.153

Hsg 2.8* .78** 110 69.6154 0.287

Ser-Time .05* .01 120 73.4154 0.472

Sex -.99 -.27

Train-Mos 6.27** .64**

B-4
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CL)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .46** .08** 80 54.1341 0.009

Ed-Yrs .5 .19** 90 58.7341 0.021

Ged -4.95** -.64 100 63.3341 0.045

Hsg 3.86** .89** 110 67.9341 0.095

Ser-Time .09** .01* 120 72.5341 0.189

Sex -i.99* -.43

Train-Mos 5.63** .51*

###############################################################################

M 0 S 75C ########################################################################### ###

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .35** .06** 80 65.9003 0.138

Ed-Yrs -.39 -. 10 90 69.4003 0.225

Ged -.18 -.80 100 72.9003 0.346

Hsg -6.93** -. 17 110 76.4003 0.491

Ser-Time .06 .02 120 79.9003 0.638

Sex -2.37 .34

Train-Mos 2.36 .03

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CL)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .35** .05** 80 64.0963 0.100

Ed-Yrs -.11 -.05 90 67.5963 0.155

Ged -.54 .74 100 71.0963 0.232

Hsg -6.45* -. 12 110 74.5963 0.333

Ser-Time .06 .01 120 78.0963 0.452

Sex -2.38 .05

Train-Mos 2.65 .09

*B-5
#############################################################################

~#######################UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU################################# M 0 S 75D

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .41** .10* 80 58.4654 0.017

Ed-Yrs -1.6"* -.25* 90 62.5654 0.044

Ged -1.87 -1.36* 100 66.6654 0.111

Hsg 2.08 1.03* 110 70.7654 0.253

Ser-Time .08 -.01 120 74.8654 0.480

Sex -4.58** -.25

Train-Mos 9.57** 1.33**

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CL)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

-- - - -- - - - - - - ----- - -

Composite .45** .10** 80 55.5742 0.006

Ed-Yrs -1.85** -.31** 90 60.0742 0.017

Ged -1.54 -1.30 100 64.5742 0.045

Hsg 1.47 .90 110 69.0742 0.114

Ser-Time .11* .00 120 73.5742 0.258

Sex -4.81** -.42

Train-Mos 8.45** 1.13**

###############################################UUUUU#######################

M 0 S 75F ###############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .21** .05** 80 66.6583 0.129

Ed-Yrs -. 07 .12 90 68.7583 0.196

Ged 3.69 .64 100 70.8583 0.286

Hsg .67 -.16 110 72.9583 0.398

Ser-Time .06 .02 120 75.0583 0.522

Sex 1.72 .27

" Train-Mos .00 .00

B-6

.7.
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CL)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .29** .07** 80 63.6595 0.036

Ed-Yrs -.16 .08 90 66.5595 0.069

Ged 2.54 .34 100 69.4595 0.131

Hsg 1.24 -.04 110 72.3595 0.232

Ser-Time .07 .02 120 75.2595 0.379

Sex .86 .06

Train-Mos .00 .00

############################U##########################################

M 0 S 76C ###############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES = = ------------------------------------------------------------- ==-- = z===========-----

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .14** .02** 80 70.1422 0.174

Ed-Yrs .38 .13 90 71.5422 0.204

Ged -.88 -.33 100 72.9422 0.239

Hsg 2.61 .52 110 74.3422 0.277

Ser-Time .03 .00 120 75.7422 0.319

Sex -2.71* -.75**

Train-Mos 2.79 -.32

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CL)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .16** .03** 80 69.4641 0.223

Ed-Yrs .19 .10 90 71.0641 0.279

Ged -1.36 -.40 100 72.6641 0.343

Hsg 2.49 .50 110 74.2641 0.414

Ser-Time .04 -.00 120 75.8641 0.458

Sex -2.88* -.78**

Train-Mos 3.82 -5.14

r,..

4

B-7
############################################################################

M 0 S 76P #############################################################################b#

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .24** .05** 80 56.3952 0.079

Ed-Yrs 1.35 .13 90 58.7952 0.124

Ged -12.26** .34 100 61.1952 0.190

Hsg 3.13 .04 110 63.5952 0.279

Ser-Time .09 .05** 120 65.9952 0.389

Sex .04 .16

Train-Mos 1.42 .08

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CL)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .33** .06** 80 53.5923 0.031

Ed-Yrs 1.07 .09 90 56.8923 0.056

Ged -11.94** .35 100 60.1923 0.097

Hsg 3.36 .09 110 63.4923 0.164

Ser-Time .10 .05** 120 66.7923 0.264

Sex -.96 .02

Tnrain-Mos 1.25 .05

#fo

M 0 S 76V

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .23** .O3** 80 62.2784 0.130

Ed-Yrs 2.52** .31* 90 64.5784 0.168

Ged -2.63 -.95 100 66.8784 0.214

Hsg 6.25** 1.24** 110 69.1784 0.269

Ser-Time .03 -.02 120 71.4784 0.332

.4 Sex .48 -.11

Train-Mos -.47 .34

SB-8
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CL)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .31** .03** 80 60.3676 0.049

Ed-Yrs 2.21** .28* 90 63.4676 0.065

Ged -1.7 -.86 100 66.5676 0.085

Hsg 5.47** 1.18** 110 69.6676 0.112

Ser-Time .05 -.02 120 72.7676 0.145

Sex -.84 -.23

Train-Mos -.39 .35

###############################################################################

M 0 S 76W ###############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

* VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .13* .02* 80 71.1629 0.227

Ed-Yrs 1.38 .07 90 72.4629 0.264

- Ged -6.52 .36 100 73.7629 0.304

* Hsg 4.51 .23 110 75.0629 0.348

Ser-Time .00 .01 120 76.3629 0.395

Sex -6.08** -1.03*

Train-Mos 2.46 .76**

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CL)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .18** .03** 80 70.2036 0.292

Ed-Yrs 1.38 .07 90 72.0036 0.358

Ged -6.11 .46 100 73.8036 0.429

Hsg 4.51 .23 110 75.6036 0.503

Ser-Time .01 .01 120 77.4036 0.578

Sex -6.78** -1.08**

Train-Mos 2.37 •77**

* B-9

A.,(
"1. ############################################################## ####### ' .M

M 0 S 76Y ###############################U#UU######U# #U#U#UU###############

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .21** •04** 80 79.5426 0.655

Ed-Yrs .13 -.04 90 81.6426 0.739

- Ged 1.54 .43 100 83.7426 0.809

Hsg 1.49 -.06 110 85.8426 0.863

Ser-Time .10* .02** 120 87.9426 0.904

Sex -.99 -.17

Train-Mos .95 .12

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CL)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

• VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .25** .04** 80 77.4779 0.509

Ed-Yrs .15 -.03 90 79.9779 0.608

Ged 1.67 .45 100 82.4779 0.698

Hsg 1.81 .01 110 84.9779 0.775

Ser-Time .111 .02 120 87.4779 0.837

Sex -1.17 -.16

Train-Mos .50 .04

###############UUUUU###UU###########UUUU######################### fff

M 0 S 76Y SKILL LEVEL 3 #######UUUU#UUU#UUUUUUUU#U ##UUU U##UUUU#U###U#######U#UUUUU############## yf

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .24** .05** 80 75.9762 0.350

Ed-Yrs -I.04* -.26* 90 78.3762 0.470

Ged -.04 .17 100 80.7762 0.594

Hsg -.28 -.11 110 83.1762 0.707

Ser-Time -.03 -.01 120 85.5762 0.799

Sex -2.13 • 70**

Train-Mos 1.0 .08

B-1O
* w

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CL)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .26* .06** 80 75.0958 0.337

Ed-Yrs -1.06* -.27** 90 77.6958 0.481

Ged .49 .26 100 80.2958 0.628

Hsg -.19 -.07 110 82.8958 0.755

Ser-Time -.02 -.01 120 85.4958 0.848

Sex -2.33 -.75**

Train-Mos .68 .01

, #############################################################################

V M 0 S 11B ###########################UUUUU#UUUU##UUUUUUUU#UUU###UUUU#U###############

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

--

Composite .28** .08** 80 66.4942 0.037

Ed-Yrs -.18 .04 90 69.2942 0.075

Ged .34 .27 100 72.0942 0.148

Hsg -.08 -.02 110 74.8942 0.272

Ser-Time -.02** .00 120 77.6942 0.444

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos 2.4 .6

-A APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CO)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite *37** .09** 80 64.8497 0.052

Ed-Yrs .22 .09 90 68.5497 0.118

Ged .36 -.18 100 72.2497 0.248

Hsg -.13 -.03 110 75.9497 0.448

Ser-Time .00 .01** 120 79.6497 0.666

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos 1.55** 48**

B-11

-'"
M 0 S liC ######UU################################################################ ###

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

•VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE iVS LOGIT

Composite .21** .05** 80 68.1418 0.040

Ed-Yrs .37 .33** 90 70.2418 0.064

Ged .23 .44 100 72.3418 0.101

Hsg -.27 -.52 110 74.4418 0.157

Ser-Time .06** .02** 120 76.5418 0.234

Sex 6.63 -4.27

Train-Mos 4.33** 1.56**

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CO)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .29** .07** 80 66.9085 0.026

Ed-Yrs .66 .45** 90 69.8085 0.051

Ged 1.34 .89 100 72.7085 0.097

Hsg -.10 -.44 110 75.6085 0.178

Ser-Time *Q9** .03** 120' 78.5085 0.303

Sex 4.49 -4.82

Train-Mos 4.08** 1.60**

#########################################################################ff#ff#

M 0 S 11H #########################################################################ffff

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT CT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .24** .06** 80 67.7861 .026

, Ed-Yrs .14 .01 90 70.1861 0.046

Ged -3.43** -1.42 100 72.5861 0.081

Hsg .33 -.15 110 74.9861 0.138

- Ser-Time .01 .00 120 77.3861 0.226

Sex -1.54 -5.85

Train-Mos .72 -.29

B-12
l- _-. - - I -- -

41.

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CO)

4 IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .29** .07** 80 66.4287 0.042

Ed-Yrs .38 .15 90 69.3287 0.081

Ged -3.51** -1.66 100 72.2287 0.150

Hsg .15 -.08 110 75.1287 0.262

Ser-Time .01 .00 120 78.0287 0.417

Sex 6.02 -4.08

Train-Mos .6 -.31

########################################################################## # #

M 0 S 12B

###############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIOS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .15** .03** 80 86.3339 0.801

Ed-Yrs -. 15 -.09 90 87.8339 0.844

Ged -.56 -.32 100 89.3339 0.880

Hsg .26 -.13 110 90.8339 0.908

Ser-Time .03 .00 120 92.3339 0.930

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos 3.75** 50**

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CO)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .17 .04 80 85.8126 0.838

Ed-Yrs .07 -.05 90 87.5126 0.885

Ged -.42 -.28 100 89.2126 0.920

*. B-13
.1%

,, ######################### ###################################'##### / ####1#

M 0 S 12C i ################UUUU####################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .11* .05** 80 87.0239 0.795

Ed-Yrs -1.04 -.06 90 88.1239 0.865

4. Ged 1.49 -.58 100 89.2239 0.914

Hsg -2.18 -.4 110 90.3239 0.946

Ser-Time .04 .01 120 91.4239 0.966

Sex 0 0

Train-Mos 1.86 .48

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CO)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

* VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .17** .06** 80 85•7871 0.707

Ed-Yrs -1.04 -.07 90 87.4871 0.814

Ged 1.65 -.48 100 89.1871 0.889

Hsg -2.61 -.50 110 90.8871 0.936

Ser-Time .03 .00 120 92.5871 0.964

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos 1.72 .34

.-,###########################################################################yM OS 12E ! ###################U#################################################### :

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECT!ONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .08** .01 80 91.0773 0.975

Ed-Yrs -.22 -.06 90 91.8773 o

Ced 3.33 4.92 100 92.6775 0. 9:76

Hsg -2.33* -1.43 110 93.4773 0. 9B1

Ser-Time -.05 -.09 120 94.2773 4., Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos -2.02* .00

B-14
APTITUDE AREA S SCORE ESTIMATES (CO) = S = = =---------------------------------------------

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .17** .14** 80 90.9748 0.799

Ed-Yrs -.02 -.24 90 92.6748 0.942

Ged 2.04 5.52 100 94.3748 0.985

Hsg -1.86 -1.61 110 96.0748 0.996

Ser-Time -.06 -.08 120 97.7748 0.999

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos 2.18** -.54

############################################################################k##

M 0 S 19D ######################################################################### # ##

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES * ~==================== == = = == = = = ======== == = =--------------------------

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIkBLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .33** .06* 80 60.6772 0.027

Ed-Yrs .43 .26 90 63.9772 0.048

Ged .84 -.03 100 67.2772 0.084

Hsg 2.09 .51 110 70.5772 0.143

Ser-Time -.02 .01 120 73.8772 0.233

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos 1.15 .29

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CO)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .46** .08** 80 58.5017 0.032

Ed-Yrs 1.13* .42** 90 63.1017 0.069

Ged .63 -.02 100 67.7017 0.141

Hsg 2.74* .56 110 72.3017 0.268

Ser-Time .01 .01 120 76.9017 0.44--

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos .91 .19

B-15
M 0 S 19E ~############################################################################H###

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES =-------------------------------===========-------:=--

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IvS LOGIT

Composite .24** .04** 80 69.1504 0.151

Ed-Yrs .11 .01 90 71.5504 0.210

Ged -1.68 -.14 100 73.9504 0.284

Hsg .46 .03 110 76.3504 0.372

Ser-Time .01 .01 120 78.7504 0.469

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos -6.3 -7.09

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CO)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT @

Composite .33** .06** 80 67.0687 0.138

Ed-Yrs .44 .07 90 70.3687 0.226

Ged -1.78 -.18 100 73.6687 0.348

Hsg .40 .02 110 76.9687 0.493

Ser-Time .03* .01** 120 80.2687 0.639

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos -2.81 -6.46

M 0 S 11B SKILL LEVEL 3 " ##########################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .35** .06** 80 63.8333 0.023

Ed-Yrs -.05 .01 90 67.3333 0.041

Ged .06 -1.42 100 70.8333 0.072

Hsg -.21 .15 110 74.3333 0.123

Ser-Time .00 .00 120 77.8333 0.204

Sex .00 -5.85

Train-Mos 3.72** -.29**

B-16
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CO)

Ivs LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .43** .07** 80 62.9978 0.070

Ed-Yrs .38 .04 90 67.2978 0.132

Ged .19 .12 100 71.5978 0.234

Hsg .23 -.18 110 75.8978 0.381

Ser-Time -.01 .00 120 80.1978 0.553

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos 3.09** .65**

######################################################################### H #

M 0 S 11H SKILL LEVEL 3 #############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES f==------====== == = = = = =

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

- - -- - - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- -- - - -

Composite .27** .07** 80 65.7019 0.082

Ed-Yrs -1.27 -.30 90 68.4019 0.153

Ged 7.00 1.50 100 71.1019 0.267

Hsg 1.02 .06 110 73.8019 0.423

Ser-Time -.04 .00 120 76.5019 0.596

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos -9.10* -1.79

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CO)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .34** .06** 80 65.7611 0.086

Ed-Yrs -.23 -.01 90 69.1611 0.146

Ged 5.43 1.23 100 72.5611 0.238

Hsg 3.05 .48 110 75.9611 0.363

Ser-Time .04 .02 120 79.3611 0.509

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos -4.18 -.77

4

B-I

............:* * ..- *-
############################################################H################

M 0 S 12B SKILL LEVEL 3 ###############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .20** .06** 80 85.9232 0.736

Ed-Yrs -.24 -.04 90 87.9232 0.836

Ged .21 -.11 100 89.9232 0.903

Hsg .69 .01 110 91.9232 0.944

Ser-Time .06* .02 120 93.9232 0.969

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos 1.3 .67

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CO)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .21** .05** 80 86.3487 0.631

Ed-Yrs .20 .10 90 88.4487 0.738

Ged .35 .02 100 90.5487 0.823

Hsg .71 -.01 110 92.6487 0.885

Ser-Time .06* .01 120 94.7487 0.927

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos .73 .44

#############################################################################£ 9ESILLEE

M 0 S 19E SKILL LEVEL 3 ###############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .24** .04** 80 65.1407 0.112

Ed-Yrs .74 .34* 90 67.5407 0.158

Ged -5.48** -.53 100 69.9407 0.219

Hsg 2.51 .58 110 72.3407 0.295

Ser-Time .08* .00 120 74.7407 0.385

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos -2.02 -.30

B- 18
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CO)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .35** .05** 80 63.9976 0.118

Ed-Yrs .66 .35* 90 67.4976 0.181

Ged -4.61" -.41 100 70.9976 0.267

Hsg 1.23 .43 110 74.4976 0.375

Ser-Time .10 .00 120 77.9976 0.497

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos -1.22 -.22

.. %. ##############################################################################

M OS 17K

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

0.,,. Composite .13"* .02** 80 77.6416 0.552

Ed-Yrs .52 .24 90 78.9416 0.601

Ged 4.95 1.11 100 80.2416 0.648

Hsg -.14 -.13 110 81.5416 0.692

Ser-Time .12 .03 120 82.8416 0.733

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos .33 -.48

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (EL)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .18** •03* 80 75.6632 0.579

Ed-Yrs .36 .23 90 77.4632 0.650

Ged 3.29 .90 100 79.2632 0.715

Hsg .22 -.41 110 81.0632 0.772

Ser-Time .15* .03* 120 82.8632 0.820

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos .69 -. 43

B-19

--------------------------

'o.....................................
~~~#######################################t################### ##it#/### ### # ,,-, ft/

M 0 S 26Q

########################################################U#####################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONSI

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .26** .07** 80 77.3094 0.409

%. Ed-Yrs -1.27 -.35 90 79.9094 0.583

Ged 8.31** 1.08 100 82.5094 0.738

.sg -7.62** -2.07** 110 85.1094 0.850

Ser-Time .11 .02 120 87.7094 0.919

Sex -5.67 -2.18**

Train-Mos 2.39 .69

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (EL)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

* VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGiT

Composite .41** .I* 80 71.6965 0.119

Ed-Yrs -.75 -.14 90 75.7965 0.268

Ged .07** .87 100 79.8965 0.499

Hsg -7.0** -1.82** 110 83.9965 0.730

Ser-Time .04 .00 120 88.0965 0.880

Sex -2.73 -1.22

Train-Mos .87 .23

~~######################################################################ff :

M OS 31E

##########################################################4#########.,t

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]3

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .43** .07** 80 74.0444 0.497

Ed-Yrs -1.23 -.45 90 78.3444 0.666

Ged -10.43* -1.12 100 82.6444 0.601

Hsg 2.40 .59 110 86.9444 0.89D

Ser-Time .16 .03"* 120 91 .2444 0.94.?

Sex 1.34* .21

Train-Mos 4.61* .55

B-20

4€,'..
*APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (EL) == == = -_= -= =- == = ==

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .49** .06* 80 70.2925 0.294

Ed-Yrs -.78 -.28 90 75.1925 0.432

Ged -7.88 -.67 100 80.0925 0.581

Hsg 2.06 .65 110 84.9925 0.716

Ser-Ti,..e .21** ,03** 120 89.8925 0.821

Sex 10.98** 1.46**

Train-Mos 6.38* .72

- .. ######################################################################## ######

M OS 31M ##############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .28** .05* 80 83.7101 0.640

Ed-Yrs -.85 -.23 90 86.5101 0.746

Ged 1.56 .74 100 89.3101 0.829

Hsg .63 -.35 110 92.1101 0.889

Ser-Time .04* .01 120 94.9101 0.929

Sex -10.55"* -197**

Train-Mos 1 .53* .34

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (EL)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .32** .09 80 77.61 53 0.476

Ed-Yrs -.69 -.20 90 80.8153 0.690

Ged 1.44 .71 100 84,0153 0.846

Hsg -.79 -.43 110 87.2153 0.931

Ser-Time .06** .01 120 90.41 53 0.971

Sex -574** -.91**

Train-Mos 1.09 .23

B-21

'Z '' :., ...... ........ .
"' #######################################################################ff###h###

M 0 S 32D "',.'.<'########################################################################t

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT OT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .22 .04** 80 69.4489 0.162

Ed-Yrs 1.93** .11 90 71.6489 0.223

Ced -1.92 -1.01 100 73.8489 0.300

Hsg .24 .27 110 76.0489 0.390

Ser-Time .16** .03** 120 78.2489 0.488

Sex 3.07 .32

Train-Mos 3.24 1.37**

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (EL)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .32** .04* 80 65.7728 0.117

Ed-Yrs 1.94 .16 90 68.9728 0.166

Ged -2.39 -.79 100 72.1728 0.228

Hsg -.43 .20 110 75.3728 0.306

Ser-Time .18** .03** 120 78.5728 0.397

Sex 7.56** .94

Train-Mos 2.94 1.39**

-. ################################################################### ,

M 0 S 36C

,.,##############################################################################

-'. GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT CT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .15** .03** 80 67.7593 0.110

Ed-Yrs -3.67** -.85* 90 69.2593 0.143

Ged 1.94 -.25 100 70.7593 0.183

Hsg -6.5** -.91* 110 72.2593 0.233

Ser-Time .07 .03* 120 73.7593 0.290

Sex -4.97** -.39

Train-Mos 4.74** .47

B-22

." ." .. . .

:. .- ' .- a .- ,. . . - .- .- . • . . - , ' , -' . . - .... " ' " " . . . . . . . . " J" P
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (EL)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTION]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .18** .05** 80 67.6283 0.073

Ed-Yrs -3.81** -. 93* 90 69.4283 0.115

Ged 2.42 -.19 100 71.2283 0.176

Hsg -6.55** -2.00 110 73.0283 0.260

Ser-Time .io** .03* 120 74.8283 0.367

Sex -1.47 .46

Train-Mos 4.14** .25

M 0 S 36K ,, ###############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .18** .05** 80 73.4454 0.234

Ed-Yrs -.21 -.07 90 75.2454 0.335

Ged -.12 -.94 100 77.0454 0.454

Hsg .24 .48 110 78.8454 0.578

Ser-Time .05 .00 120 80.6454 0.693

Sex -1.98 -. 63

Train-Mos 2.15 1.36**

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (EL)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .24** .08 80 71.9449 0.128

Ed-Yrs -.37 -. 26 90 74.3449 0.246

Ged -.44 -1.06 100 76.7449 0.421

Hsg .06 .21 110 79.1449 0.618

Ser-Time .07* .01 120 81.5449 0.782

Sex 2.05 .49

Train-Mos 1.14 1.26

B..2

i.,.. .
###################UU###UU#U##UU##U###UU#UUUUUUUUUUUUU#######################

M 0 S 13B ##############UUUU#UUUUUUUU##UUUUU#######UUU#U##UU#####################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .23** .04** 80 70.5846 0.206

Ed-Yrs .13 -.05 90 72.8846 0.279

Ged 1.97 .32 100 75.1846 0.367

Hsg -.55 -. 11 110 77.4846 0.463

Ser-Time .10"* .01* 120 79.7846 0.563

Sex 13.04 6.96

Train-Mos 3.48** .54**

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (FA)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .38** .07** 80 67.4836 0.141

Ed-Yrs -.27 -. 14 90 71.2836 0.248

Ged 1.26 .19 100 75.0836 0.399

Hsg -.94 -.21 110 78.8836 0.572

Ser-Time .12** .02** 120 82.6836 0.729

Sex 16.75 7.65

Train-Mos 3.62** .62**

#######U#####U#####U####UU#########UU###U#########################ff

M 0 S 13F ###############################UU###################UUU#############

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .31** .05** 80 67.8193 0.079

Ed-Yrs .86 •30** 90 70.9193 0.125

Ged -2.13 .15 100 74.0193 0.190

Hsg .51 .26 110 77.1193 0.279

Ser-Time .08* .00 120 80.2193 0.390

Sex .00 .00

* Train-Mos 2.18 .2

B-.24

I1
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (FA)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .46** .08** 80 61.2706 0.033

Ed-Yrs .72 .28* 90 65.8706 0.071

Ged -2.09 .12 100 70.4706 0.146

Hsg 1.53 .47 110 75.0706 0.275

Ser-Time .12** .01 120 79.6706 0.458

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos 1.53 .13

###U##########UUUU###U##UUUUUU######U#UU##UUUUUU####UU##UUU######

M 0 S 13B SKILL LEVEL 3 ##########U#U##UU##UU#####UU#U############U######U#UU#################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .23** .04** 80 75.1771 0.367

Ed-Yrs -1.24 -.03 90 77.4771 0.464

Ged .67 -.43 100 79.7771 0.563

Hsg -4.43 .20 110 82.0771 0.658

Ser-Time .01 .00 120 84.3771 0.742

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos .02 .42

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (FA)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .41** .o6 80 71.3515 0.285

Ed-Yrs -2.09 -.15 90 75.4515 0.420

Ged -.72 -.68 100 79.5515 0.569

Hsg -4.27 .26 110 83.6515 0.706

Ser-Time .06 .01 120 87.7515 0.814

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos .19 .48

A B-25

....
M 0 S 13F SKTLL LEVEL 3 #########UUUUUUUUUUUU#####UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU####################/

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES === ====2 = 2=================== == ==

IVS LOGIT CT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .33** .10"* 80 65.4297 0.017

Ed-Yrs -1.48 -.50* 90 68.7297 0.046

Ged -7.31 -2.49* 100 72.0297 0.115

Hsg 5.80* 1.01 110 75.3297 0.261

Ser-Time .08 .04 120 78.6297 0.490

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos -.11 .90

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (FA)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .36** .13** 80 63.0767 0.008

Ed-Yrs -1.53 -.54* 90 66.6767 0.030

Ged -5.36 -1.93 100 70.2767 0.102

Hsg 4.98 .58 110 73.8767 0.295

Ser-Time .08 .04 120 77.4767 0.604

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos -1.22 .69

S##################UUU##UU######################################### f~fff

M 0 S 51B ########################UUU#U########UU##UU#######UU#U#UUUU#####f#

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

- Composite .2** .05** 80 79.7798 0.157

Ed-Yrs .23 -.07** 90 81.7798 0.235

Ged 3.38 -.94* 100 83.7798 0.337

Hsg -.56 .48** 110 85.7798 0.455

Ser-Time .07 .00 120 87.7798 0.530

Sex -12.00** -.63

Train-Mos 3.74* 1.36

B-26
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (GM)

IVS LOCIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .35** .06** 80 77.4565 0.577

Ed-Yrs .2 -.68 90 80.9565 0.713

Ged .86 1.31 100 84.4565 0.819

Hsg -.16 -2.05 110 87.9565 0.892

Ser-Time .09 .02 120 91.4565 0.938

Sex -8.71* -.83

Train-Mos 2.69 .10*

###############################################################################

M 0 S 55B ###############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .24** .10* 80 61.204 0.003

Ed-Yrs -1.49 -.84 90 63.604 0.003

Ged -1.88 -6.07 100 66.004 0.021

Hsg -.98 -.16 110 68.404 0.054

Ser-Time .07 .03 120 70.804 0.135

Sex -3.23 -.09

Train-Mos -.28 1.18

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (GM)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .30** .09** 80 61.4144 0.005

Ed-Yrs -1.24 -.30 90 64.4144 0.012

Ged 2.1 -6.39 100 67.4144 0.029

Hsg .43 .78 110 70.4144 0.068

Ser-Time .08 .03 120 73.4144 0.152

Sex 1.62 1.41

Train-Mos -.54 1.07

itB-2

B.-27
################################################################### ######## ItMS5

MO0S 57H ############################ #U #U U ###### ### ####

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .02 -.01 80 69.3267 0.094

Ed-Yrs 3.35 1.33 90 69.5267 0.085

Ged 9.26 1.01** 100 69.7267 0.078

Hsg 4.52 1.59 110 69.9267 0.071

Ser-Time .05 .00 120 70.1267 0.065

Sex -5.83 -2.01

Train-Mos -.43 .13

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (GM)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

* VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .07 .01 80 69.1189 0.159

Ed-Yrs 3.33 1.32** 90 69.8189 0.173

Ged 8.75 .83 100 70.5189 0.188

Hsg 4.67 1.67 110 71.2189 0.204

Ser-Time .06 .01 120 71.9189 0.221

Sex -5.27 -2.03

Train-Mos -. 33 .14

• " #####/#/##################################################################M S62

MO0S 62E ######## ##### ####### #################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOG TT

Composite .18** .03** 80 67.8027 0.044

Ed-Yrs -1.14 -.15 90 69.6027 0.059

Ged 4.74 .53 100 71 .4027 0.078

Hsg -6.59** -.94 110 73.2027 0.102

Ser-Time .04 -.01 120 75.0027 0.133

Sex -14.71** -6.15

Train-Mos .60 -.14

B-28
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (GM)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .26** .06** 80 65.362 0.056

Ed-Yrs -.76 -.12 90 67.962 0.098

Ged 4.67** .56 100 70.562 0.166

Hsg -5.77* -.88 110 73.162 0.265

Ser-Time .06 .00 120 75.762 0.397

Sex -13.07* -5.79

Train-Mos .36 -.17

M O S 63B , ###############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .11** .02** 80 82.2228 0.724

Ed-Yrs -.49 -.17 90 83.3228 0.762

Ged .74 .16 100 84.4228 0.796

Hsg .05 -.19 110 85.5228 0.827

Ser-Time .04** .01** 120 86.6228 0.854

Sex -453** -.91*

Train-Mos 1.17** .23*

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (MM)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .18** .04** 80 80.4054 0.650

Ed-Yrs -.50 -.18 90 82.2054 0.735

Ged .75 .18 100 84.0054 0.805

Hsg .06 -.20 110 85.8054 0.860

Ser-Time .04** .01"* 120 87.6054 0.902

Sex -1.38 -.27

Train-Mos 1.05* .21

-'2

* B-29
###############################################################################

M 0 S 63D ########################################################################## #####

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .09** .04 80 90.0405 0.975

Ed-Yrs -1.34 -1.58 90 90.9405 0.983

Ged -4.50 -2.83** 100 91.8405 0.989

Hsg -1.10 -1.71 110 92.7405 0.992

Ser-Time -.04 .04 120 93.6405 0.995

Sex 0 0

Train-Mos 1.71 8.61

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (MM)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .18** .05 80 87.006 0.954

Ed-Yrs -.37 -.92 90 88.806 0.972

Ged -4.68 -3.02** 100 90.606 0.983

Hsg .98 -.74 110 92.406 0.989

Ser-Time -.04 .04 120 94.206 0.994

Sex 0 0

Train-Mos 3.32 8.93

S#################################################################### #######

M 0 S 63H ~###############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONSI

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .13** .04** 80 77.7847 0.572

Ed-Yrs .26 .03 90 79.0847 0.666

Ged 3.34* .68 100 80.3847 0.749

Hsg .13 -.03 110 81.6847 0.816

Ser-Time -.02 -.01 120 82.9847 0.869

Sex 2.96* -.12

Train-Mos -.81 -.76**

*I B-30

...............................
.0. z== APTITUDE __ AREA = SCORE ESTIMATES = 

(MM)=2 = 

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

*Composite .13** .04** 80 76.2404 0.432

Ed-Yrs .19 .02 90 77.5404 0.532

Ged 3.35* .65 100 78.8404 0.629

Hsg -.07 -.07 110 80.1404 0.717

Ser-Time -.03 -.02* 120 81.4404 0.790

Sex -.20 .63

Train-Mos -.86 -.74**

M 0 S 63N

####################################################################### ##ff i#

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

0

Composite .17** .05"* 80 75.889 0.290

Ed-Yrs -.41 .00 90 77.5893 0.402

Ged -3.71 -.34 100 79.2893 0.526

Hsg -.12 .02 110 80.9893 0.647

Ser-Time .o6 .02 120 82.6893 0.751

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos .00 .00

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (MM)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGiT

Composite .22** .06** 80 73.63838 0.082

Ed-Yrs -.39 .00 90 75.83838 0.140

Ged -.327 -.20 100 78.03838 0.2 ;

Hsg .21 .10 110 80.23838 0.550

Ser-Time .04 .01 120 82.43858 0.496

Sex .00 .00

TrF'n-Mos .00 .00

B-31

.° A.
############################################################### ktl## i##M

0 S 63S ############################################################################ ##

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .08* .67 80 92.8937 1

Ed-Yrs -. 13 3.72 90 93.6937 1

Ged 2.50 1.49 100 94.4937 1

Hsg -.05 .50 110 95.2937 1

Ser-Time .03 .43 120 96.0937 1

Sex .18 1.39

Train-Mos 1.92 16.69

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (MM)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .13** .10 80 91.7482 0.984

Ed-Yrs -. 17 .53 90 93.0482 0.994

Ged 3.00 6.38 100 94.3482 0.998

Hsg -.17 -.43 110 95.6482 0.999

Ser-Time .03 .08 120 96.9482 1

Sex -.29 4.18

Train-Mos 2.83 9.15

## ######################################################################## ff

M 0 S 63W #############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .19** .06** 80 88.2681 0.828

Ed-Yrs .67 -. 29 90 90.1681 0.898

Ged -.89 .21 100 92.0681 0.941

Hsg 1.84 -.31 110 93.9681 0.967

Ser-Time .04 .01 120 95.8681 0.982

Sex -.30 -.67

Train-Mos -.26 .13

B-32
- APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (MM) --------------------------------- == === =-----------------------------------

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .23** .06** 80 85.8214 0.738

Ed-Yrs .06 -.39 90 88.1214 0.837

Ged -1.22 .03 100 90.4214 0.904

J Hsg 1.2 -.32 110 92.7214 0.945

Ser-Time .02 .01 120 95.0214 0.969

Sex -.75 .19

* Train-Mos -4.83 .08

4#### ### ## #### #################################

M 0 S 63Y 7. #############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .05 - 80 93.072 1

Ed-Yrs .04 - 90 93.572 1

Ged -.93 - 100 94.072 1

Hsg -.26 - 110 94.572 1

Ser-Time .03 - 120 95.072 1

Sex -11.15"*

Train-Mos -1.23 -

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (MM)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .07 - 80 91.6802 1

Ed-Yrs .12 - 90 92.3802 1

Ged -.68 - 100 93.0802 1

. Hsg -.05 - 110 93.7802 1

Ser-Time .02 - 120 94.4802 1

Sex -9.06**

Train-Mos -1.31

B-33

% " " " : ar . " -' "' ' '- " L -" .-- -" -"e' " '-..- --. '-.'- '. '- " .' '. ,;- "'.'" " " ". , " "-"-,, . "* ,,. ,,.." . . ' '.,* .. ,,... .'
##########################################################################P

M 0 S 15D #############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .28** .05** 80 75.3402 0.444

Ed-Yrs -2.25 -.05 90 78.1402 0.569

Ged 1.39 .17 100 80.9402 0.685

Hsg -2.78 -.28 110 83.7402 0.782

Ser-Time .06 .01 120 86.5402 0.855

Sex -7.02* -1.37**

Train-Mos .10O* 1.21**

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (OF)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .33** .05** 80 70.4735 0.262

Ed-Yrs -2.77 -.14 90 73.7735 0.369

Ged 1.02 .15 100 77.0735 0.491

Hsg -.30 -.32 110 80.3735 0.614

Ser-Time .08 .02 120 83.6735 0.724

Sex .25 -.15

Train-Mos S.29** .90*

###################################################################### # ft

M 0 S 15E ######################################################################### f

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES * ~========================================S===-= = = =========== = =--------------

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .19** .03 80 58.8777 0.005

Ed-Yrs -1.62 -.69 90 60.7777 0.006

Ged -2.78 -8.37 100 62.6777 0.008

Hsg -2.51 -.27 110 64.5777 0.011

Ser-Time .04 -.02 120 66.4777 0.015

Sex -12.02** -.20

Train-Mos 5.18** 8.12

B-34 '* -- -c
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (OF) ..V.. ,,. ass ... _= ...... = .. _- ......................... _-_= .. _-2= = .. _-= = .=2==2= _-=._ = = == -= -_

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .25** .06* 80 56.6296 0.001

Ed-Yrs -1.44 -.79 90 59.1296 0.002

Ged -3.69 -8.33 100 61.6296 0.003

Hsg -1.63 -.26 110 64.1296 0.005

Ser-Time .05 -.01 120 66.6296 0.010

Sex -9.62** .49

Train-Mos 3.13* 7.77

%- ############################# # ############# #########

M 0 S 16D #####################/#/####################################//###

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .01 .00 80 91.0065 0.917

Ed-Yrs -.92 -.34 90 91.1065 0.917

Ged -1.91 -.44 100 91.2065 3.917

Hsg .31 -.29 110 91.3065 0.917

Ser-Time .00 .00 120 91.4065 0.917

Sex -9.25** -2.07**

Train-Mos -.04 -.20

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (OF)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .13** .03 80 89.8842 0.892

Ed-Yrs -1.01 -.37 90 91.1842 0.917

Ged -1.87 -.44 100 92.4842 0.938

Hsg .13 -.34 110 93.7842 0.953

Ser-Time .02 .00 120 95.0842 0.965

Sex -9.19** -2.15**

Train-Mos -.05 -.17

B-35

; " b ",,'.":' ", " " " " ',<' ',-,<.:',-"<'- .' ,';/ '.'"'7,. < .''.''-"".''- '- -'*. ',,-... .",' .".,' .''.'.'" .... ''.","," ,. '"',''.''.
######################################################################/#/#//####

M 0 S 16E ##############UU##UUUU#UUU#U#UUUU############################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .15"* .O3* 80 80.4525 0.701

Ed-Yrs 1.51 .09 90 81.9525 0.760

Ged 1.01 .52 100 83.4525 0.811

Hsg 1.71 -.39 110 84.9525 0.852

Ser-Time .07 .01 120 86.4525 0.886

Sex -13.91* -1.15

Train-Mos 5.43 1.02

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (OF)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite *33** .03 80 74.7979 0.498

Ed-Yrs .92 .11 90 78.0979 0.573

Ged .72 .41 100 81 .3979 0.644

Hsg .07 -.47 110 84.6979 0.710

Ser-Time .11 .01 120 87.9979 0.767

Sex -11.19** -.74

Train-Mos 4.62 .91

###########################################################################

M 0 S 64C ###############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .13"* .02** 80 81 .0417 0.506

Ed-Yrs -.76 -.26** 90 82.3417 0.556

Ged 1.66 .47 100 83.6417 0.605

Hsg -.43 -.22 110 84.9417 0.652

Ser-Time .00 .00 120 86.2417 0.695

Sex -2.79** .68**

Train-Mos 2.40** •44**

I

~B- 36
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (OF)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .17** .03** 80 82.4458 0.625

Ed-Yrs -.86* -.27** 90 84.1458 0.692

Ged 1.24 .41 100 85.8458 0.752

Hsg -.22 -.18 110 87.5458 0.804

Ser-Time .02 .00 120 89.2458 0.847

Sex .13 -.17

Train-Mos 2.36** .42**

#############################################################################

M 0 S 94B

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .23** .05** 80 68.3086 0.146

Ed-Yrs .87* .09 90 70.6086 0.223

Ged -1.00 -.27 100 72.9086 0.321

Hsg 2.05* .09 110 75.2086 0.438

Ser-Time .06** .02** 120 77.5086 0.562

Sex -3.15** -.53**

Train-Mos 3.55** .54**

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (OF)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .23** .05** 80 67.1907 0.135

Ed-Yrs 1.19** .18 90 69.4907 0.205

Ged -1.09 -.32 100 71.7907 0.298

Hsg 3.54** .43 110 74.0907 0.412

Ser-Time .09** .02** 120 76.3907 0.536

Sex .75 .32

Train-Mos 3.00** .46**

i-

[-.4

B-37
_ . 1:####################UU#######################################################

~#U#############U############### M 0 S 94B SKILL LEVEL 3 # #U #U # ####### ########d

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .22** .05** 80 73.48 0.317

Ed-Yrs 1.16 .10 90 75.68 0.434

Ged -8.76 -6.18 100 77.88 0.558

Hsg 12.45* 6.43 110 80.08 0.676

Ser-Time .05 .01 120 82.28 0.775

Sex 2.24 .82

Train-Mos 4.34** .60

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (OF)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .20** .03** 80 74.0582 0.233

Ed-Yrs 1.34 .11 90 76.0582 0.291

Ged -12.54* -6.91 100 78.0582 0.357

Hsg 17.01** 7.29 110 80.0582 0.428

Ser-Time .08 .01 120 82.0582 0.503

Sex 4.85* 1.25**

Train-Mos 3.42* .41

M 0 S 72E ########## ##########################################"Y######

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT LSQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGT

-- -- - ---.- - - - - ----- - -

Composite .13** .02** 80 77.1624 0.420

Ed-Yrs -.86 .01 90 78.4624 0.469

Ged 1.45 .37 100 79.7624 0.519

Hsg -.75 .30 110 81.0624 0.569

Ser-Time .04 .01 120 82.3624 0.617

Sex -6.60** -. 10*

Train-Mos .76 .02

B-38

, . , '.* 
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (SC)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite 0.21** .03* 80 77.0518 0.397

Ed-Yrs -.82 .02 90 79.1518 0.471

Ged 1.62 .42 100 81.2518 0.545

Hsg -.50 .34 110 83.3518 0.618

Ser-Time .05 .01 120 85.4518 0.686

Sex -5.82** -.98**

Train-Mos .83 .03

#############################################################################H#

M 0 S 05B ###############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE I

T S LOGIT

Composite .09** .02** 80 82.3437 0.610

Ed-Yrs .12 .20 90 83.2437 0.656

Ged 1.98 .46 100 84.1437 0.700

Hsg -1.45 -.07 110 85.0437 0.740

Ser-Time .00 -.01 120 85.9437 0.777

Sex 5.07** 1.61**

Train-Mos .39 -.11

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (SC)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .20** .05** 80 79.6248 0.628

Ed-Yrs -.08 .17 90 81.6248 0.735

Ged 1.56 .39 100 83.6248 0.821

Hsg -1.49 -.08 110 85.6248 0.883

* Ser-Time .02 .00 120 87.6248 0.926

' Sex -4.35** -1.5*

* Train-Mos .44 -.11

043

B-39

-A-.....,.. ..... ...................................... 1......-A*.9 ' .- 
############################################################/####i##/#####h#,u

M 0 S O5C ############################################################################## #

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT CT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .20** .04** 80 69.2673 0.126

Ed-Yrs .29 .04 90 71.2673 0.176

Ged 2.74 .32 100 73.2673 0.242

Hsg -.43 -.09 110 75.2673 0.323

Ser-Time .12** .02** 120 77.2673 0.416

Sex -4.97** -.83**

Train-Mos 1.86 .01

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (SC)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .27** .05** 80 70.2102 0.126

Ed-Yrs .39 .06 90 72.9102 0.192

Ged 2.68 .3 100 75.6102 0.281

Hsg -.36 -.06 110 78.3102 0.392

Ser-Time .15** .02** 120 81.0102 0.515

Sex -4.16** -•65**

Train-Mos 1.88** .02

###### ####################################################################fff i

M 0 S 05H ################################## #### ##########f####

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .38** .09** 80 74.9903 0.145

Ed-Yrs .18 .05 90 78.7903 0.294

Ged -8.2** -2.45** 100 82.5903 0.506

Hsg 4.02 1.05 110 86.3903 0.716

Ser-Time .16** .05** 120 90.1903 0.861

Sex -1.98** -.19

Train-Mos -1.31 .09

B..
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (SC)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .39** .10** 80 75.8136 0.226

Ed-Yrs .14 .03 90 79.7136 0.442

Ged -9.28** -2.66** 100 83.6136 0.683

Hsg 3.92 .89 110 87.5136 0.854

Ser-Time .17** .05** 120 91.4136 0.941

Sex -.78 .21

Train-Mos -1.66 -.01

M O S 54E ##########UUUUUUUUU########################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .35** .06** 80 67.0945 0.212

Ed-Yrs .61 .00 90 70.5945 0.329

Ged -.79 -.17 100 74.0945 0.472

Hsg 1.39 -.01 110 77.5945 0.620

Ser- T ime .07* .01 120 81.0945 0.748

Sex -6.50** -.68**

Train-Mos 1.04 .07

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (ST)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .54** .08** 80 61.5724 0.049

Ed-Yrs .59 .01 90 66.9724 0.103

Ged .31 -.01 100 72.3724 0.204

Hsg 1.68 .08 110 77.7724 0.363

Ser-Time .10** .O1" 120 83.1724 0.559

Sex -5.23** -.47*

Train-Mos -.39 -.12

I B-4 IFI

Bh
##############################################################k# ############

M 0 S 74D ##############################UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHU#UUUUUUUUU#################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .17** .04** 80 73.9956 0.299

Ed-Yrs -1.57* -.49** 90 75.6956 0.389

Ged -.85 -.74 100 77.3956 0.487

Hsg -.79 -.48 110 79.0956 0.586

Ser-Time -.06 .00 120 80.7956 0.679

Sex .73 .21

Train-Mos 4.45* 1.07**

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (ST)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .21** .07** 80 72.3396 0.072

Ed-Yrs -1.71** -.56** 90 74.4396 0.135

Ged -.85 -.87 100 76.5396 0.240

Hsg -.35 -.39 110 78.6396 0.388

Ser-Time -.07 -.01 120 80.7396 0.561

Sex 1.27 .28

Train-Mos 5.04 1.34**

######################################################################### f#

M 0 S 74F ########################################################################### ##

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .33** .06** 80 69.4612 0.198

Ed-Yrs -.19 .10 90 72.7612 0.310

Ged -2.35 -.25 100 76.0612 0.450

Hsg 2.86 .30 110 79.3612 0.598

Ser-Time .03 .00 120 82.6612 0.751

Sex 2.18 .22

Train-Mos 2.89 -.38

B-42
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (ST)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .41** .07** 80 65.5066 0.055

" Ed-Yrs -.58 .02 90 69.6066 0.105

Ged .24 .16 100 73.7066 0.191

Hsg .96 -.03 110 77.8066 0.323

Ser-Time .04 .00 120 81.9066 0.490

Sex 4.20** .57

Train-Mos 2.26 -.45

###########################################################################

M 0 S 82C ##############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .25** .16** 80 53.0415 0

Ed-Yrs .65 .00 90 55.5415 0

Ged -6.95** -6.72 100 58.0415 c

Hsg -.13 .14 110 60.5415 0.001

Ser-Time .01 -.04 120 63.0415 0.006

Sex -4.97* -5.41

Train-Mos -3.21* 6.39

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (ST)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .41** .19** 80 48.0548 0

Ed-Yrs .39 .07 90 52.1548 0

Ged -6.87** -9.47 100 56.2548 0

Hsg -.48 .92 110 60.3548 0.001

Ser-Time .04 -.02 120 64.4548 0.006

Sex -4.5* -3.51

Train-Mos -3.96** 5.14

B-43

" . . . . .--
M 0 S 91E

' #################################################################### ########H#

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .08** .09** 80 88.7988 0.995

Ed-Yrs .24 5.68 90 89.5988 0.998

Ged .15 -10.96 100 90.3988 0.999

Hsg .51 25.21 110 91.1988 1

Ser-Time .05 .02 120 91.9988 1

Sex .20 -.05

Train-Mos 3.40** 1.87**

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (ST)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

* VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOG!T

Composite .18** .07** 80 86.8779 0.994

Ed-Yrs .10 5.79 90 88.6779 0.997

Ged .44 -10.91 100 90.4779 0.998

Hsg -.07 25.4 110 92.2779 0.999

Ser-Time .05 .03 120 94.0779 1

Sex .45 1.01

Train-Mos 2.86** 1.62*

###################################################################### ## ##

M 0 S 91P

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .03 -.02 80 87.6446 0.999

Ed-Yrs -.27 -.09 90 87.9446 0.999

Ged 2.03 6.47 100 88.2446 0.999

Hsg -4.68 -1.6 110 88.5446 0.993

Ser-Time -.01 0.04* 120 88.8446 0.998

Sex -.69 -.50

Train-Mos -.01 -.64

B-44

Job .[ ,l[ 1 % i I .i lli <i i j, . i ? i i4. -t,¢ ) 7 .. ., 2" -. .-. i;" . " ' i -'
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (ST)

IVS LOGIT AA [ SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .08 -.01 80 90.1292 0.912

Ed-Yrs -.75 -.09 90 90.9292 0.903

Ged 1.44 6.29 100 91.7292 0.894

Hsg -.02 -1.46 110 92.5292 0.885

Ser-Time -.02 -.04* 120 93.3292 0.874

Sex -2.45 -.58

/ Train-Mos .77 -.70

-.4

": ########### #### ###U###############################################

M OS 91Q

*############U#### /###### #############

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

4 VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .09** .02 80 89.2273 0.953

Ed-Yrs -.73** -.35* 90 90.1273 0.961

Ged .57 -.61 100 91 .0273 0.968

Hsg .70 5.37 110 91.9273 0.973

Ser-Time -.03 -.02 120 92.8273 0.978

Sex -2.48** -.18" Train-Mos .5 .72

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (ST)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .08* .00 80 89.0049 0.951

Ed-Yrs -.75** -.34* 90 89.8049 0.951

Ged 1.44 -.36 100 90.6049 0.951

Hsg -.02 5.36 110 91.4049 0.951

Ser-Time -.02 -.02 120 92.2049 0.951

Sex -2.45** -1.20*

Train-Mos .77 .80

4

w. N B-45

.4' .~t

<.,, {,," 2 ,-v',,, '.; .:.: -...,..:.,:, . ., ,-:-: , .,,-,;- -,.: ..- ..,:- .-..... . . , .,, :- .,, .,:--,.
#####################################################################t#####//#

M 0 S 91R

################################ ### ###################### ##

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .21** .08** 80 85.2201 0.859

Ed-Yrs -.14 -.31 90 87.3201 0.931

Ged -1.63 -7.14 100 89.4201 0.968

Hsg .59 5.85 110 91.5201 0.985

Ser-Time .05 .05 120 93.6201 0.993

Sex -1.14 -.45

Train-Mos 1.3 .41

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (ST)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

,- -----

Composite *30** .18** 80 81.9489 0.282

Ed-Yrs .02 -.34 90 84.9489 0.704

Ged -3.07 -9.20 100 87.9489 0.935

Hsg .59 7.44 110 90.9489 0.989

Ser-Time .07 .07 120 93.9489 0.998

Sex .54 .60

Train-Mos 1.26 .43

#########################################################

M 0 S 92B ############################################################## ff

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .17** .08** 80 87.9212 0.949

Ed-Yrs -.63 -.47 90 89.6212 0.976

Ged 5.59 -1.79 100 91.3212 0.989

Hsg -.08 7.07 110 93.0212 0.995

Ser-Time -.06 -.10 120 94.7212 0.998

Sex -.24 .21

Train-Mos 5.37** 2.68*

4B-6

B-4

,V .i" . -''. - .. V ..' % ,' " * -. , , • . , - . - .- . . . .. , . . . . . .
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (ST)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOCIT

Composite .25** .13** 80 84.5524 0.664

Ed-Yrs -.56 .02 90 87.0524 0.879

Ged 4.78 -2.48 100 89.5524 0.964

Hsg .20 8.05 110 92.0524 0.990

Ser-Time -.0, -.09 120 94.5524 0.997

Sex .07 .04

- Train-Mos 4.87** 1.72

, #############################################################################

M 0 S 93H ~###############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .13** .02 80 79.3597 0.516

Ed-Yrs .56 .12 90 80.6597 0.566

Ged 3.84 1.94 100 81.9597 0.614

Hsg 1.23 -.25 110 83.2597 0.660

Ser-Time .01 .00 120 84.5597 0.704

Sex .26 -.45

Train-Mos .64 .49

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (ST)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .12 .02 80 79.8878 0.639

Ed-Yrs .78 .16 90 81.0878 0.684

Ged 3.93 1.93 100 82.2878 0.726

Hsg 1.29 -.24 110 83.4878 0.764

Ser-Time .01 .00* 120 84.6878 0.798

Sex .50 .41

Train-Mos 1.05 .54

B-47
M 0 S 95B ########################################################################## #####

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .14** .05** 80 81 .9053 0.636

Ed-Yrs -.38 -.27 90 83.3053 0.742

Ged -2.09** -.35** 100 84.7053 0.826

Hsg .27 -.07 110 86.1053 0.887

Ser-Time -.01 .00 120 87.5053 0.928

Sex -2.19** -1.14**

Train-Mos 1.65** .32*

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (ST)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

* VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .20** .07** 80 81.0113 0.434

Ed-Yrs -*44* -.30 90 83.0113 0.607

Ged -1.67* -.21 100 85.0113 0.757

Hsg .27 -.08 110 87.0113 0.862

Ser-Time -.01 .00 120 89.0113 0.927

Sex -1.82** -1.02**

Train-Mos 1.22** .12

M 0 S 95C

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .06 .01 80 89.6018 0.938

Ed-Yrs -.47 .11 90 90.2018 0.943

Ged -.59 6.42 100 90.8018 0.949

Hsg .84 .79 110 91.4018 0.953

Ser-Time -.06 -.02 120 92.0018 0.958

Sex -3.10 .13

Train-Mos 2.62** .48

B-48
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (ST)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .07 -.01 80 96.0372 0.904

Ed-Yrs -.44 .14 90 96.7372 0.895

Ged -.48 6.5 100 97.4372 0.886

Hsg .80 .76 110 98.1372 0.875

Ser-Time .06 -.02 120 98.8372 0.864

Sex -2.84 .23

Train-Mos 2.68* .37

################################################################### ######## i

M 0 S 96B ##############################################################################ff

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .51* .06** 80 55.9659 0.069

Ed-Yrs -.17 .04 90 61.0659 0.120

Ged .62 -.34 100 66.1659 0.199

Hsg -2.8 .22 110 71.2659 0.311

Ser-Time .11 .02 120 76.3659 0.451

Sex -1.21 .02

Train-Mos 7.32** .50

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (ST)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .63** .07** 80 52.1051 0.072

Ed-Yrs -.06 .06 90 58.4051 0.135

Ged 2.66 -.13 100 64.7051 0.239

Hsg -1.36 .36 110 71.0051 0.388

Ser-Time .14 .02 120 77.3051 0.560

Sex .55 .18

Train-Mos 6.76** .48

B-49

), . -.- ..- - ,- . . . " , . - . . - . 't • - - . - , . . - - - . - . - . - . - . . -
" ##########################################################/###########/ #####h

M 0 S 98C #############################################################################i/k/

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

* VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .47** .06** 80 56.8274 0.087

Ed-Yrs .11 -.05 90 61.5274 0.148

Ged .72 .22 100 66.2274 0.241

Hsg -4.41 -.50 110 70.9274 0.366

Ser-Time .22** .04** 120 75.6274 0.513

Sex 1.95 .42

Train-Mos .68 .12

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (ST)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .56** .09** 80 52.4211 0.014

Ed-Yrs .10 -.09 90 58.0211 0.033

Ged -1.08 .02 100 63.6211 0.077

.Hsg -3.29 -.44 110 69.2211 0.170

Ser-Time .21** .04** 120 74.8211 0.334

Sex 3.33** .69**

Train-Mos .57 .17

M 0 S 98G ############################################################## ######### :ff#

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGiT

Composite .22** .03** 80 70.5667 0.155

Ed-Yrs -.04 .08 90 72.7667 0.199

Ged 8.63 6.53 100 74.9667 0.251

Hsg -6.43 .63 110 77.1667 0.311

Ser-Time .19** .03** 120 79.3667 O.1379

Sex -2.48** -.39

Train-Mos 6.17** 1.08**

B_50

-d-o

I.,.

4'r. . . , "-[ ' , . . '. " ' ' . ' " 

. " , , .. .. - .o , .. . . . . . . . .

*. . . .. . . . . ';c. . ' . \ u"- l-, ' <5," : :2 ",.- -'" .
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (ST)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .42** .08** 80 62.3152 0.044

Ed-Yrs -.17 .06 90 66.5152 0.093

Ged 12.46 7.23 100 70.7152 0.186

Hsg -5.06 1.01 110 74.9152 0.338

Ser-Time .21** .04** 120 79.1152 0.532

Sex -.93 -.11

Train-Mos 5.79** 1.10*

. ###############################################################################

M 0 S 19D SKILL LEVEL 3 ###############################################################################

" - GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .27** .04** 80 65.9682 0.144

Ed-Yrs .69 .25 90 68.6682 0.201

Ged -2.98 -.47 100 71 .3682 0.272

Hsg 4.76* 1.00* 110 74.0682 0.358

Ser-Time -.02 -.01 120 76.7682 0.454

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos -6.12** -1.15*

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (CO)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .38** .07** 80 64.6079 0.098

Ed-Yrs 1.71** .42** 90 68.4079 0.180

Ged -3.9 -.67 100 72.2079 0.306

Hsg 5.78** 1.20** 110 76.0079 0.470

Ser-Time -.01 -.01 120 79.8079 0.641

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos -5.97** -1.23*

. .45

."J"

-'BS
M 0 S 54E SKILL LEVEL 3

#4# # # # # # # # # # ## ########## h

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONSI

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .41** .08** 80 60.9266 0.061

Ed-Yrs .19 -.26 90 65.0266 0.126

Ged 3.86 .23 100 69.1266 0.243

Hsg -1.44 -.38 110 73.2266 0.416

Ser-Time .20** .04 120 77.3266 0.614

Sex -7.43** -1.92*

Train-Mos 2.85 .70*

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (ST)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .56** .13** 80 56.4593 0.010

Ed-Yrs -.29 -.51** 90 62.0593 0.037

Ged 3.66 .12 100 67.6593 0.125

Hsg -2.19 -.61 110 73.2593 0.344

Ser-Time .19** .04* 120 78.8593 0.658

Sex -5.96** -1.87*

Train-Mos 2.36 .81*

M 0 S 95B SKILL LEVEL 3

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

% IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGT

Composite .20** .08** 80 78.3305 0.301

Ed-Yrs -.66 -.24 90 80.3305 0.489

Ged 2.88 1.13 100 82.3305 0.680

Hsg -2.63 -.95 110 84.3305 0.826

Ser-Time .06 .01 120 86.3305 0.913

Sex -1.69 .40

Train-Mos -3.37** -2.25**

B-52
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (ST)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .21** .08** 80 79.1996 0.424

Ed-Yrs -.68 -.22 90 81.2996 0.621

Ged 4.19 1.61 100 83.3996 0.785

Hsg -3.37 -1.20 110 85.4996 0.890

Ser-Time .05 .01 120 87.5996 0.947

Sex -3.13 -.20

Train-Mos -3.11** -1.98**

M 0 S 96B SKILL LEVEL 3 ##############################################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

* VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .71** .04** 80 48.5001 0.112

Ed-Yrs -1.70 -.13 90 55.6001 0.159

Ged 10.87 -.16 100 62.7001 0.220

Hsg -17.15** -1.05 110 69.8001 0.296

Ser-Time .12 .02 120 76.9001 0.385

Sex .18 -.01

Train-Mos 1.51 .07

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (ST)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

-------- --- -- _ _ _ --- -- --- -- - -

Composite •89* .07** 80 44.2018 0.039

Ed-Yrs -2.06 -.21 90 53.1018 0.076

Ged 4.15 -. 59 100 62.0018 0.141

Hag .' -14.88 -.99 110 70.9018 0.249

Ser-Time .09 .02 120 79.8018 0.400

Sex 3.78 .40

Train-Mos .49 -.02

B-53
########################################################################1

M 0 S 05K

######################I#i#############################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .04 .01 80 79.126 0.407

Ed-Yrs 3.38** •47** 90 79.526 0.431

Ged -7.70 -1.92 100 79. 926 0.456

, Hsg 9.86 1.4 110 80.326 0.481

Ser-Time .o6 0 120 80.726 0.506

Sex -2.38 .22

Train-Mos .4 -.24

APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (ST)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .18 .04** 80 74.2637 0.167

Ed-Yrs 3.06** .42 90 76.0637 0.231

Ged -8.25 -2.06 100 77.8637 0.309

Hsg 9.58 1.36 110 79.6637 0.400

Ser-Time .07 .00 120 81.4637 0.499

Sex -1.3 .46

Train-Mos .34 -.25

~############################################################################ ##

M OS 13E ##########################################################

GENERAL TECHNICAL SCORE ESTIMATES

IVS LOGIT GT [SQTPROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

Composite .38** .05** 80 49.5845 0.029

Ed-Yrs -.16 -.13 90 53.3845 0.047

Ged 3.63 -6.75 100 57.1845 0.076

Hsg -3.41 .48 110 60.9845 0.119

Ser-Time .15* .00 120 64.7845 0.182

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos 6.29* 1.10

B-54
APTITUDE AREA SCORE ESTIMATES (ST)

IVS LOGIT AA [SQT-PROJECTIONS]

VARIABLE COEFS COEFS SCORE IVS LOGIT

- Composite .06** 80 43.0597 0.016

Ed-Yrs -.85 -.17 90 48.7597 0.030

Ged 5.26 -6.67 100 54.4597 0.052

Hsg -5.64 -.62 110 60.1597 0.092

Ser-Time .18** .00 120 65.8597 0.155

Sex .00 .00

Train-Mos 6.65** 1.16

J',: ###############################################################################

020386

B-55

%" . ' - ' , -. .. "'' - .- , . - -. .-. ,. -.. .. . . . . . .. . .