alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 297 

Marking the dedication of the Gaylord Nelson Wilderness within the Apostle 

Islands National Lakeshore. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2005 

Mr. FEINGOLD (for himself and Mr. KOHL) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Marking the dedication of the Gaylord Nelson Wilderness 

within the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore. 

Whereas the Honorable Gaylord Nelson, a State Senator, 

Governor, and United States Senator from Wisconsin, devoted his life to protecting the environment by championing issues of land protection, wildlife habitat, environmental health, and increased environmental awareness, including founding Earth Day; 

Whereas the Honorable Gaylord Nelson authored the Apostle 

Islands National Lakeshore Act, which led to the protection of one of the most beautiful areas in Wisconsin and 

recognized the rich assemblage of natural resources, cultural heritage, and scenic features on Wisconsin’s north 

coast and 21 islands of the 22-island archipelago; 
2 

•SRES 297 ATS

Whereas the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore was designated a National Park on September 26, 1970; 

Whereas, on December 8, 2004, approximately 80 percent of 

the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore was designated 

the Gaylord Nelson Wilderness; 

Whereas the Gaylord Nelson Wilderness within the Apostle 

Islands National Lakeshore provides a refuge for many 

species of birds, including threatened bald eagles and endangered piping plovers, herring-billed gulls, doublecrested cormorants, and great blue herons, and is a safe 

haven for a variety of amphibians, such as blue-spotted 

salamanders, red-backed salamanders, gray treefrogs, 

and mink frogs, and is a sanctuary for several mammals, 

including river otters, black bears, snowshoe hares, and 

fishers; 

Whereas the official dedication of the Gaylord Nelson Wilderness occurred on August 8, 2005, 36 days after the Honorable Gaylord Nelson’s passing; and 

Whereas the Honorable Gaylord Nelson changed the consciousness of our Nation and embodied the principle that 

1 person can change the world, and the creation of the 

Gaylord Nelson Wilderness is a small, but fitting, recognition of his efforts: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the Honorable Gaylord Nelson’s 

3 environmental legacy; 

4 (2) celebrates the dedication of the Gaylord 

5 Nelson Wilderness within the Apostle Islands Na6 tional Lakeshore; and 
3 

•SRES 297 ATS

1 (3) requests that the Secretary of the Senate 

2 transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to the 

3 family of the Senator. 

Æ
No. 59185.

protest 239494-K (New York).

#### Importsales, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

At the hearing, the amended memorandum of the collector was received in evidence. Said memorandum states, that following the appraiser’s amended description, the merchandise would now be properly classified as free of duty under paragraph 1810. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
P. O. Box 3506,
West Palm Beach, FL 33402
Telephone: (561) 494-1040
Fax: (561) 494-1117

wot Pat “Beach Date: September 14, 2012

“The Capital City of the Palm Beaches”

Mr. Seth C. Behn, AICP

Lewis, Longman & Walker, P.A.
515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 1500
West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Re: _ Service Availability for: Florida East Coast Industries (Three possible locations)
East side of tracks north of N 5" Street, West side of tracks between Datura and Evernia,
East side of tracks near Okeechobee Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida

Dear Mr. Behn,

In response to your request for verification of service availability for the subject arsa please be advised of the following:
Water Service:

The City has sufficient water plant capacity to serve these properties. Domestic, Fire and Irrigation waterservices to the
subject described areas must be designed andconstructed at the developer’s expense.
Wastewater Service:

The City has sufficient wastewater plant capacity to serve these properties. Sanitary sewer service for each of the described
areas must be designed andconstructed at the developer’s expense.
Storm Water:

We will require that you retain storm water on your site(s) to meet the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD)
criteria and obtain permits from the proper drainage district to discharge Storm water into their system.
Solid Waste Collection:

The City will be able to supply solid waste collection to serve these properties. Dumpster area(s) must be provided by the
developer per City of West Palm Beach Standar&.
Roadways:

There is adequate access to serve these properties. Driveway connections must be designed and constructed at the
developer’s expense. Proper permits must be obtained from the City and/orthe jurisdictional transportation agency.

This letter of service availability does not give approval of the development or service connections. The City of West Palm
Beach Engineering Services Departmentstill requires the review and approval of the plans for the actual service connections to
be made, at the owner’s expense. The developer will assume all Right-of-Way utility improvements and upgrades
associated with this project. The applicable capacity charges, installation charges, deposits, and other normal

fees charged by the Public Utilities Department shall be assessed at the time of request for permits/review.
Thank you for the request and interest in being served by the City of West Palm Beach, Public Utilities Department. Please feel
free to contact us at (561) 494-1040 regarding this or any other related matter.

Sincerely,

laseeulh bagel

Manuel Gonzalez, Project Coordinator
Cc: Brian M. Moree, CWPB Construction Manager
No. 47545.

#### Protest 32789-K of Semon Bache & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

A sample received in evidence consists of a circular piece of glass, button-like in appearance, ruby red in color, and about % of 1 inch in diameter and approximately K of 1 inch in height at the apex. It is convex on the upper surface and concave on the under side, the upper surface being smooth and the under side gilded. The assistant treasurer testified in behalf of th? plaintiffs and the examiner testified in behalf of the defendant. It was fairly established by this testimony that the chief use of the articles is on bolts that are used to securely hold license plates on automobiles, that their use is primarily ornamental, and that they are impractical for any illuminating purpose. It is contended by the plaintiffs that the case of *United States*v. *Horni*(27 C. C. P. A. 316, C. A. D. 106) is controlling in this case. However, the court was of the opinion that the button-like article in the present case is entirely different from that in the cited case in that it is neither an illuminating article nor one that is used in connection with artificial illumination, that no light passes through it, and that it does not “pass, reflect, refract, disperse, color, or otherwise effect the light for either practical or ornamental illuminating purposes,” citing *413
      *Solomon*v. *United States*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 353, T. D. 41256). It was therefore found that the glass articles under consideration are not properly dutiable as illuminating articles for use in connection with artificial illumination, as classified. One of the claims of the plaintiffs is that the articles are faceted, but the plaintiffs have failed to meet the burden of establishing this fact, and a most casual examination shows that they are not faceted within the ordinary meaning of that term. It was held that notwithstanding the showing that the collector’s classification is wrong, the plaintiffs failed to prove the correctness of their claims. The protest was therefore overruled without affirming the action of the collector.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Accor Franchising North America,

LLC, et al.,

Plaintiffs

 v.

HI Hotel Group, LLC, et al.,

Defendants

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action 2:12-mc-00027

Judge Frost

Magistrate Judge Abel

ORDER

Counsel for Accor Franchising North America, LLC advised the Court that he

has received the documents from Red Roof Franchising LLC and that the motion to

compel is MOOT. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

s/ Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case: 2:12-mc-00027-GLF-MRA Doc #: 8 Filed: 08/28/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000099102
<NAME> TRANS-INDUSTRIES, INC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          65,386
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,801,491
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 11,831,454
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,900,094
<PP&E>                                      15,969,574
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,953,662
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,774,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,526,981
<BONDS>                                      3,237,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       313,974
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,026,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,774,818
<SALES>                                      8,910,832
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,961,927
<CGS>                                        6,247,649
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,450,365
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             184,214
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 79,699
<INCOME-TAX>                                    58,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,699
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,699
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1586

THUYA MAUNG,

Petitioner,

v.

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A98-478-440)

Submitted: April 11, 2008 Decided: April 25, 2008

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sandy Khine, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Jeffrey S.

Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez

Wright, Assistant Director, Jonathan Robbins, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION

LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Thuya Maung, a native and citizen of Burma, petitions for

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals adopting and

affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for

relief from removal. 

Maung first challenges the determination that he failed

to establish eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a

determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show

that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable

factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.”

INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have

reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Maung fails to

show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Having failed to

qualify for asylum, Maung cannot meet the more stringent standard

for withholding of removal. Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th

Cir. 1999); INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
(logo)TORCHLIGHT

 

 

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

CERTIFICATIONJ.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-C33, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through CertificatesSeries 2015-C33 (the “Trust”)

 

I, WilliamA. Clarkson, on behalf of Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as special servicer(the “Certifying Servicer”), certify to J.P. MorganChase CommercialMortgage Securities Corp. and its officers, directors and affiliates, and withthe knowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification, that:

 

I (orServicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the CertifyingServicer’s activities for the fiscal year 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) and theCertifying Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement;and

 

Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement inall material respects during the Reporting Period.  

 

 

Date:February 28, 2019

 

 

TORCHLIGHTLOAN SERVICES, LLC, as Special

Servicer

 

 

By: /s/ William A. Clarkson

Name: William A. Clarkson

Title: Authorized Signatory

 

 

280 Park Avenue, New York,NY 10017

T 212.883.2800  F 212.883.2560

E info@torchlightloanservices.com

www.torchlightinvestors.com
#### August F. Stauff & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6409.

Entry No. 715314, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, November 1942, etc.

Certified November 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 29, 1942, etc.

(Decided October 3, 1946)

*Daniel P. McDonald*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*352Colb, Judge

(Abstract): These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

A written stipulation of fact, upon which the cases have been submitted, establishes that export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)) is the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values for the articles in question are the appraised values, less additions made on entry by the importer because of advances in similar cases.
Order filed July 27, 2012 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-00527-CR

 14-10-00528-CR

ANDRES MALDONADO NAVA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1260355, 1233224

ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) and 

34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's Exhibit 150, State's Exhibit 269a , Appellant's 

Exhibit #1 and Appellant's Exhibit #2.

The clerk of the 232nd District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this court the original 

of State's Exhibit 150, State's Exhibit 269a , Appellant's Exhibit #1 and Appellant's Exhibit #2, on or 

before August 7, 2012. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this 

original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of 
inspection, to return the original of State's Exhibit 150, State's Exhibit 269a , Appellant's Exhibit #1 

and Appellant's Exhibit #2, to the clerk of the 232nd District Court.

PER CURIAM
B'2&;

,17+(81,7('67$7(6',675,&7&2857

)257+(6287+(51',675,&72)2+,2

($67(51',9,6,21

$'9$1&(''5$,1$*(6<67(06,1&

  3ODLQWLII

Y       &LYLO$FWLRQ1R&9

48$/,7<&8/9(57,1&   

&2817<3,3(&253DQG

-2+1+6211(17$* 

  'HIHQGDQWV

25'(5*5$17,1*'()(1'$1767+(23325781,7<72

6833/(0(17(;3(575(3257,15(63216(72$)),'$9,72)0$5.6785*(21

 'HIHQGDQWV 4XDOLW\ &XOYHUW ,QF &RXQW\ 3LSH &RUS DQG -RKQ+ 6RQQHQWDJ

FROOHFWLYHO\3'HIHQGDQWV ́KDYLQJPRYHGWKLV&RXUWRQ2FWREHUIRUDQRUGHUDOORZLQJ

'HIHQGDQWV WKH RSSRUWXQLW\ WR VXSSOHPHQW WKHLU H[SHUW UHSRUW WR UHVSRQG WR WKH -XO\ 

$IILGDYLW RI 0DUN 6WXUJHRQ DQG VXEVHTXHQWO\ $GYDQFHG 'UDLQDJH 6\VWHPV ,QF DQG WKH

'HIHQGDQWVKDYLQJUHDFKHGDVWLSXODWLRQWRDGGUHVV'HIHQGDQWV¶PRWLRQ

,7,6+(5(%<25'(5('

  'HIHQGDQWV¶ H[SHUW PD\ VXSSOHPHQW KHU H[SHUW UHSRUW WR UHVSRQG WR QHZ

VWDWHPHQWV DQG RSLQLRQV DGGUHVVHG LQ WKH -XO\  $IILGDYLW RI 0DUN 6WXUJHRQ DQG KLV

VXEVHTXHQWGHSRVLWLRQWHVWLPRQ\EXWQRWSUHYLRXVO\H[SUHVVHGWR'HIHQGDQWVZLWKLQWKLUW\

GD\VRIWKLV2UGHU

  3ODLQWLIIPD\GHSRVH'HIHQGDQWV¶H[SHUWZLWQHVVDVWRKHUVXSSOHPHQWDORSLQLRQV

UHJDUGLQJ WKH -XO\  $IILGDYLW RI 0DUN 6WXUJHRQ DQG KLV0D\  DQG $XJXVW

GHSRVLWLRQVZLWKLQWZHQW\GD\VDIWHU'HIHQGDQWV¶UHEXWWDOUHSRUWLVFRPSOHWHG

 'DWHGWKLVBBBBBBBGD\RI1RYHPEHU

      %<7+(&2857

 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

      7KH+RQRUDEOH*UHJRU\/)URVW

18th

/s/ GREGORY L. FROST

Case: 2:12-cv-01121-GLF-NMK Doc #: 128 Filed: 11/18/15 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 34.7



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To Management of AEGON USA Realty Advisors, LLC

We have
examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,that AEGON USA
Realty Advisors, LLC (AEGON or the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage backed securities
transactions listed in managements assertion (the Platform), as of December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v),
1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii), 1122(d)(4)(xiv) and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which AEGON has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management
is responsible for the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that AEGON complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December
31, 2015 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.



LOGO

March 14, 2016



LOGO
Case: 2:12-cv-01203-JLG-TPK Doc #: 6 Filed: 01/04/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-07T18:15:50-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
EXHIBIT 32.2


		  CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
		      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
			     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Thomas
Brandt, Executive Vice President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Trans-Lux
Corporation, do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

    (1) The Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2008 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

    This Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not
be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Registrant or
the certifying officer.



				       /s/ Thomas Brandt
				       -----------------------------
Date:  August 14, 2008		       Thomas Brandt
				       Executive Vice President and
				       Co-Chief Executive Officer
No. 46889.

#### Protests 977701-G, etc., of R. H. Macy *&*Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consisting of fancy woven luncheon table goods, fringed, linen and wool, wool chief value, is the same as the articles the subject of *Akawo*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 370, C. D. 498). In accordance therewith they were held dutiable at 90 percent under paragraph 1529 as claimed. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
Share Knowledge ~ Save a Life

ZERO FATALITIES

SOFA ALERT

PLEASE POST IMMEDIATELY

June 26, 2023 – A Conductor trainee who was riding the 

leading end of a shoving movement was fatally injured after 

falling into the path of the movement.

August 6, 2023 - A Conductor trainee who was riding the side 

of equipment was fatally injured after encountering a close 

clearance situation during a shove movement.

Take Away

While these recent cases have not yet been analyzed, the 

SOFA Working Group is concerned by the two fatalities that have 

occurred involving employees in training and reminds all 

employees to remain vigilant while mentoring inexperienced 

employees. Last, but not least, remember to always hold a job 

briefing whenever the job or situation changes, especially prior to 

making a shove movement. 

As a cross-industry collaboration for over 20 years, the SOFA Working Group has identified the Possible 

Contributing Factors for more than 210 switching operations fatalities since 1992. The SOFA Working Group 

reports its finding and emerging data trends with the goal of zero fatalities in the railroad industry.