alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
% Worker exposure 2 weeks, 5 days/week exposure, 30 days no exposure

% From Occup_Soil Inc for PBPK.xlsx, Applicator Rochelle rate, Cole Crops

% January 19, 2016

% Cecilia Tan

% Setting model parameters

use human_parameters_MRP

QPC = 31; % to get QALV = 8.3 L/min @BW = 69 kg

use preg_female_parameters

BWSW=1;%Set BW to a fixed value

BWST=69;%Set BW to 69kg

PREG=0;%Not pregnant

DZONE = 1;%Turn dermal exposure on

KDIS = 0.0;%daily dissipation

TSTOP=1392;%Simulation time in hours

% Dermal exposure

SAF=1; % Fraction of skin in contact with chlorpyrifos.

FAD=1; % Fraction of dose available to be absorbed. Values of <1 could be used if pesticide is encapsulated.

DERM =5.91;% dose in ug/kg

D3=5; %DAYS/WEEK

P2=8; %HRS/DAY

S2=0 ;%OFFSET FROM 0 START TIME (EG IF YOU WANT TO MODEL FROM MIDNIGHT, BUT DOSE AT 8 AM)

%W2=28; %28 day exposure

W2=14; %14 day exposure

% Inhalation exposure

CONCMGM=0.000863; % Inhalation concentration mg/m3. Value is largest value reported in monitoring data.

D3IN=5; %DAYS/WEEK

P2IN=8; %HRS/DAY

S2IN=0 ;%OFFSET FROM 0 START TIME (EG IF YOU WANT TO MODEL FROM MIDNIGHT, BUT DOSE AT 8 AM)

%W2IN=28; %28 day exposure

W2IN=14; %14 day exposure

prepare @clear@all

start @NoCallback

simall = [_time _rbcce _urinetcpy _cv*350.6];%conc unit = ug/L

%save simall @file='applicator_spray_cole_rochelle_01192016' @format=ascii

save simall @file='applicator_spray_cole_rochelle_01212016' @format=ascii
No. 44199.

#### Protests 660690-G, etc., of A. Hirschberger (New York).

Opinion by

Bbown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of bodies, hoods, forms, or shapes similar to that the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were sustained accordingly.
BATHYMETRIC MAP

| 510000m.:

6640000m.Y,

BERING SEA
ALEUTIAN BASIN

16650000m.N,

6550000m.)

/
7/220

fd

|

[/

16550000m.N

Ao

973

997 998

£1041 { 1042

~~ 660000m£,

1
1016.4, O17
i

T50000m.

Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service (NOS) from Bathymetric Data other than
NOS hydrographic surveys. This is a facsimile reproduction of the bathymetric manuscript and

does not necessarily represent the final published form. This information is not intended for *

navigational purposes. .
Bathymetric Contour Intervals: 50 meters to maximum depth, supplemented by 10 meter
intervals.

Datum: Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW).

Universal Transverse Mercator Grid. Zone 60; 10,000 meter ticks (---) are shown inside the
neatline. .

Protraction Diagram data shown in a subdued (screened) black. was compiled by the Minerals
Management Service (MMS).

= THIS MAP IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal leasing purposes; for such purposes

use the MMS Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction Diagrams.
- Heavy line(s) indicate limits of these protraction diagrams.

EVALUATION OF BATHYMETRIC DATA

Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service from
Random Tracklines and Bathymetric Surveys dated 1944 to 1980,
The Bathymetric Data ranges in scale from 1:500,000 to
1:1,000,000 with a minimum line spacing of 3.0.and @ maximum
line spacing of 15.0 nautical miles.

Data corrected for sound velocity according to Echo'Sounding
Correction Tables, 19

OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MAP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
‘NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE

1989

Produced at Washington, D.C,
for ~

“UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE

TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION
Scale 1:250,000.
10

—

oO” 5 15 20 Statute Miles
=
i?) 5 10 15 20 25 30. Kilometers
a _
io} 5 10 * 15 Nautical Miles
J

477!
60" 7
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
¢
x
x
x
x
x
x
“
x Bathymetric data from sources other than
4 NOS hydrographic surveys.
59°

59°

ALEUTIAN BASIN
NOS NO 60-2 (OCS)

INDEX TO ADJOINING SHEETS

ec
e1*

x PERVENETS
x7 mueumian| "canyon
BASIN NOt
NO 60-2 former

* st. MATTHEW CANYON

* ST, MATTHEW
‘CANYON
NO 1-3
former
patron canyon |
58°! 58°
174° Teo" wr

TOP OW
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v WALTER J. KOREN, Private First Class, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

17 USCMA 513, 38 CMR 311

No. 20,678

May 3, 1968

*Lieutenant Clinton F. Raymond,*USNR, argued the cause for Appellant, Accused. With him on the brief was *Captain W. H. Hogan, Jr.,*USNR.

*Captain R. S. Gasiorowski,*USMCR, argued the cause for Appellee, United States. With him on the brief was *Lieutenant Colonel C. R. Larouche,*USMC.

Opinion of the Court

Ferguson, Judge:

As in United States v Lipovsky, 17 USCMA 510, 38 CMR 308, this day decided, issues are presented to this Court inquiring whether accused was denied a speedy trial and, if so, whether the prejudice flowing from such denial was eliminated by a pretrial agreement in the case. As in that case, we are unable to determine whether a majority of the board passed upon the issue as one of fact. See United States v Lamphere, 16 USCMA 580, 37 CMR 200. Accordingly, we remand the case for clarification of the decision. United States v Stivers, 11 USCMA 512, 29 CMR 328; United States v Judd, 10 USCMA 113, 27 CMR 187.

In addition, it is urged that the accused was deprived of the services of some of his appointed defense counsel. The appointing order in fact lists three officers as defense counsel. Only one, Captain Joseph E. McDonald, appeared at the trial, having, in addition, represented the accused at the pretrial investigation. In United States v Tav*514olilla, 17 USCMA 395, 38 CMR 193, we pointed out accused was entitled to be represented by each and every member of the defense named as such on the appointing order, noting those not present “could not be authorized by the convening authority to be absent from the trial.” *Tavolilla,*supra, at page 399. On the basis of inquiries made by the law officer and knowledgeable replies by the accused, we found in that case an express waiver of the right to have other counsel present and assisting in the defense. Here, the law officer made no such inquiries, but the record expressly reflects accused was to be “defended by Captain Joseph E. McDonald, U. S. Marine Corps Reserve.” Fairly read, and absent any complaint by the accused, such indicates waiver of his entitlement to the presence and services of the other members of the defense. United States v Tavolilla, supra; United States v Culp, 14 USCMA 199, 33 CMR 411, separate opinion of Judge Ferguson, at page 219.

The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record of trial is remanded to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for action not inconsistent with this opinion.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Kil-day concur.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 63 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National High School Seniors Voter 

Registration Day. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2005 

Mr. VITTER submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National High School 

Seniors Voter Registration Day. 

Whereas in order for the Government of the United States 

to remain of the people, by the people, and for the people, 

individuals must take advantage of their right to vote; 

Whereas the right to vote is one of the most important rights 

of a citizen, and every effort should be made to promote 

voter registration at school so that students may begin 

participating in the foundation of the Nation’s representative democracy; 

Whereas the Legislature of Louisiana voted in 2002 to recognize annually the first Tuesday in May as National High 

School Seniors Voter Registration Day; and 
2 

•SCON 63 IS

Whereas the purpose of National High School Seniors Voter 

Registration Day is to allow students to register to vote 

at school to encourage their participation in making democracy work: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress supports the goals and ideals 

3 of National High School Seniors Voter Registration Day, 

4 and encourages all eligible students to register to vote. 

Æ
Before the Third Division,

December 3, 1951

No. 56105.

protest 120928-K (New York).

#### Federal Wine & Liquor Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the September 30, 1997 condensed consolidated balance sheet, condensed 
consolidated statement of income for the nine months ended September 30, 1997, 
and the notes thereto, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                        104,334 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  77,479 
<ALLOWANCES>                                    4,472 
<INVENTORY>                                    80,650 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0<F1>       
<PP&E>                                      3,034,486      
<DEPRECIATION>                              1,316,974    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              2,126,335      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0<F1>    
<BONDS>                                       842,306  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                      106,689 
<OTHER-SE>                                    479,223       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                2,126,335         
<SALES>                                       193,101          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              623,875<F2>          
<CGS>                                         168,942          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 410,218          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             56,585       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               114,831       
<INCOME-TAX>                                   42,669      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            72,162      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                   72,162 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0<F3> 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
<FN>

<F1> The Company issues financial statements utilizing a non-classified balance
     sheet.

<F2> The Company's revenues are derived primarily from railcar leasing.

<F3> The Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
1 Of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.



# United Stat es Court of Appeals

For the First C ircuit
No. 02-1938 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
v. JOHN B. STEWART, Defendant, Appellant.

Before Lynch, Circuit Judge , Coffin and Porfilio, 1 Senior Circuit Judges .

ERRATA
The opinion of the court issued on July 29,2003, is amended as follows: On page 8, line 7: delete "has the obligation" and substitute "should" On page 8, line 8: delete "to" On page 8, line 14: insert the following footnote after "cause." Altho ug h we urge full disclosure of all non-trivial information available to law enforcement, this does not alter the longstanding materiality test for a Frank s hearing. An evidentiary hearing is required only if the defendant is able to show that alleged misstatements or omissions are material to the probable cause determination.
# Official Journal C 117/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 117 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 592 April 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 117

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 592 April 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 117/1 | Initiation of proceedings (Case M.7758 — Hutchison 3G Italy/WIND/JV) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 117/1

Initiation of proceedings (Case M.7758 — Hutchison 3G Italy/WIND/JV) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2016/C 117/2 | List of national contact points for tackling cross-border vehicle crime | 2 |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 117/3 | Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,00 % on 1 April 2016 — Euro exchange rates | 7 |
| 2016/C 117/4 | Notice of invitation to tender for the buying-in of skimmed milk powder by the paying agencies | 8 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2016/C 117/2

List of national contact points for tackling cross-border vehicle crime

2

European Commission

2016/C 117/3

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,00 % on 1 April 2016 — Euro exchange rates

7

2016/C 117/4

Notice of invitation to tender for the buying-in of skimmed milk powder by the paying agencies

8

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 117/5 | Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures | 9 |
| 2016/C 117/6 | Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures | 10 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 117/7 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7943 — DOW/DCC) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 11 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY

European Commission

2016/C 117/5

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

9

2016/C 117/6

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

10

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2016/C 117/7

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7943 — DOW/DCC) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

11

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2009018EN.01001401.xml

| 24.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 18/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 18/14

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 January 2009

(2009/C 18/06)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2795 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,65 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4535 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,93870 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7058 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4955 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,9940 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,106 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 289,85 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7042 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4405 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3053 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1433 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9836 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6087 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9238 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,4592 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9282 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 787,50 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,2081 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7492 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3973 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 496,74 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6388 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,580 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,2975 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,674 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0121 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,1433 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,9000 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2795

JPY

Japanese yen

113,65

DKK

Danish krone

7,4535

GBP

Pound sterling

0,93870

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7058

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4955

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,9940

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

28,106

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

289,85

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7042

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4405

RON

Romanian leu

4,3053

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1433

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9836

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6087

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9238

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,4592

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9282

KRW

South Korean won

1 787,50

ZAR

South African rand

13,2081

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7492

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3973

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 496,74

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6388

PHP

Philippine peso

60,580

RUB

Russian rouble

42,2975

THB

Thai baht

44,674

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0121

MXN

Mexican peso

18,1433

INR

Indian rupee

62,9000

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 217 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 217

        Designating August 13, 2005, as ``National Marina Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 2005

  Mrs. Murray (for herself and Ms. Cantwell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
        Designating August 13, 2005, as ``National Marina Day''.

Whereas the people of the United States value highly recreational time and the 
        ability to access the waterways of the United States, one of the 
        country's greatest natural resources;
Whereas in 1928, the National Association of Engine and Boat Manufacturers first 
        used the word ``marina'' to describe a recreational boating facility;
Whereas the United States is home to more than 12,000 marinas that contribute 
        substantially to local communities by providing safe and reliable 
        gateways to boating;
Whereas the marinas of the United States serve as stewards of the environment 
        and actively seek to protect surrounding waterways for the enjoyment of 
        this generation and generations to come;
Whereas the marinas of the United States provide communities and visitors with a 
        place where friends and families, united by a passion for the water, can 
        come together for recreation, rest, and relaxation; and
Whereas the Association of Marina Industries has designated August 13, 2005 as 
        ``National Marina Day'' to increase awareness among citizens, 
        policymakers, and elected officials about the many contributions that 
        marinas make to communities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates August 13, 2005 as ``National Marina Day'';
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        ``National Marina Day'' with appropriate programs and 
        activities; and
            (3) urges the marinas of the United States to continue to 
        provide environmentally friendly gateways to boating for the 
        people of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0773 Directorate ID: 2009-SW-71-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Model MBB-BK 117 C-2 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 88 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The proposed actions are intended to detect blind rivets installed in the long tail rotor 

drive shaft, which could lead to failure of the tail rotor drive shaft and subsequent loss of control 

of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $4,600

Labor per Helicopter

(2 x $85/work-hour) $170

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $4,770

Total US Fleet Cost $419,760, assuming that the long tail rotor drive 

shaft assembly would be required to be replaced 

on the entire fleet.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Jim Grigg
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             TRANS-INDUSTRIES, INC.

                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trans-Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kai Kosanke, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Kai Kosanke
-------------------------------------
Name: Kai Kosanke
Title: Vice President, and
       Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 15, 2005

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate
disclosure document.


                                       27