alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

Calendar No. 259 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 255 

Recognizing the achievements of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service 

and the Waterfowl Population Survey. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2005 

Mrs. LINCOLN (for herself and Mr. COCHRAN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

OCTOBER 26, 2005 

Reported by Mr. INHOFE, without amendment 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the achievements of the United States Fish and 

Wildlife Service and the Waterfowl Population Survey. 

Whereas every spring and summer teams of United States 

Fish and Wildlife Service pilot-biologists take to the skies 

to survey North America’s waterfowl breeding grounds 

flying more than 80,000 miles a year, crisscrossing the 

country just above the treetops and open fields, they and 

observers on the ground record the number of ducks, 

geese, and swans and assess the quality and quantity of 

water-fowl breeding habitats; 
2 

•SRES 255 RS 

Whereas the pilot biologists operate from the wide open bays 

and wetlands of the eastern shores of North America to 

some of the most remote regions of Canada and Alaska, 

and are documenting an important part of our wildlife 

heritage; 

Whereas the Waterfowl Population Survey, operated by the 

United States Fish and Wildlife Service, is celebrating its 

50th anniversary in 2005, is featured on the 2005–2006 

Duck Stamp, and has been recognized by the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation for its contribution to waterfowl hunting; 

Whereas the Waterfowl Population Survey Program has 

evolved into the largest and most reliable wildlife survey 

effort in the world; 

Whereas for more than 50 years cooperative waterfowl surveys have been performed by the United States Fish and 

Wildlife Service, the Canadian Wildlife Service, State and 

provincial biologists, and nongovernmental partners; and 

Whereas survey results determine the status of North America’s waterfowl populations, play an important role in setting annual waterfowl hunting regulations, and help 

guide the decisions of waterfowl managers throughout 

North America: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the achievements and contribu3 tions of the Waterfowl Population Survey Program; 

4 (2) expresses strong support for the continued 

5 success of the Waterfowl Population Survey Pro6 gram; 
3 

•SRES 255 RS 

1 (3) encourages the United States Fish and 

2 Wildlife Service in its efforts to broaden under3 standing and public participation in the Waterfowl 

4 Population Survey Program by increasing partner5 ships to continue growth and development of the 

6 Survey; and 

7 (4) reaffirms its commitment to the Waterfowl 

8 Population Survey Program and the conservation of 

9 the rich natural heritage of the United States. 
Calendar No. 259 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 255 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the achievements of the United States 

Population Survey. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Waterfowl 

OCTOBER 26, 2005 

Reported without amendment
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          81,014
<SECURITIES>                                 4,079,830
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,347,893
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,475,798
<PP&E>                                      90,738,345
<DEPRECIATION>                              31,150,467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              75,420,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,445,431
<BONDS>                                     41,418,456
<COMMON>                                       183,430
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,001,082
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                75,420,767
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,677,055
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,849,495
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,850
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,506,993
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,306,717
<INCOME-TAX>                                   904,996
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,401,721
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,401,721
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.82
        

</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

June 5, 1958

No. 62044.

#### M. Aronin & Sons et al. *v.*United States,

protests 147812-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskins the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Joseph Rotberg & Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(40 Cust. Ct. 22, C. D. 1952), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
LARRY A. GIBBS JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4915

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 8, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Nassau County.

Robert M. Foster, Judge.

Larry A. Gibbs Jr., pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, WETHERELL, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR
(logo)****CURCIO

+COHEN

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

Managing Member

Park Bridge Lender ServicesLLC

New York, NY

 

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’sReport on Assessment of 2016 Compliance by Park Bridge Lender Services LLC withRegulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”), thatPark Bridge Lender Services LLC (the “Company”) complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities andExchange Commission’s Regulation AB as of and for the year ended December31, 2016, excluding those criteria noted as not applicable (N/A) within ExhibitB to Management’s Report. The transactions covered by this report areonly those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trustadvisor or operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the “Platform”)identified in Management’s Report. Reference Exhibit A toManagement’s Report for the transactions covered by this examination.Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion onmanagement’s assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of a selectedsample of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whetherthe Company performed those selected activities in compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria during the specified period. Our procedures werelimited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by theCompany during the period covered by this report. Our examination was notdesigned to detect material noncompliance arising from errors that may haveoccurred prior to or subsequent to our tests, that may have affected theCompany’s servicing activities during the period covered by this report.We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’scompliance with the applicable servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit B to Management’sReport with respect to the transactions identified in Exhibit A toManagement’s Report as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, forthe Platform, is fairly stated in all material aspects.

 

 

/s/ Curcio & Cohen,CPA’s, P.C.

 

 

New York, NY

February 2, 2017

 

 

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTSPC 7 PENN PLAZA, SUITE 1500 NEW YORK NY 10001

TEL: 212 557-9800  FAX:212 557 9819   WEBSITE: WWW.CWCCPAFIRM.COM
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DALE B. GREEN,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D18-1611

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed August 24, 2018

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit 

Court for Putnam County,

Patti A. Christensen, Judge.

Dale B. Green, Daytona Beach, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. 

We affirm the postconviction court’s denial of Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion as it 

was both untimely and improperly successive. We dismiss Appellant’s untimely effort to 

seek review of the denial of his rule 3.800(c) motion, as no appeal is available from an 

order denying that motion which sought purely discretionary relief from the court below.

AFFIRMED. 

COHEN, C.J., LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v WAYNE E. KITTLE, Basic Airman, U. S. Air Force, Appellant

9 USCMA 321, 26 CMR 101

No. 10,982

Decided June 6, 1958

*Lieutenant Colonel Ellis L. Gottlieb*and *Major George M. Wilson*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Robert W. Michels*and *Lieutenant Colonel James R. Thorn*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused was convicted of four specifications of unauthorized absence and three specifications of escape from confinement. Under specification 2, Charge I, the accused was convicted of an unauthorized absence from his organization at Truax Field, Wisconsin, from November 1 to November 27,1956. He was found guilty of an unauthorized absence from the same organization for the period from November 29, 1956, to April 24, 1957 (specification 3, Charge I). In Charge II he was charged with two specifications of escape from confinement from the base stockade at Truax Field, on November 1 and November 29, respectively. Although the place of each offense is ostensibly different, it is apparent from the evidence that the escape from the stockade provides the basis for the unauthorized absence entry in the morning report of the accused’s organization. See United States v Mitchell, 7 USCMA 238, 22 CMR 28. The third escape and unauthorized absence were from the same unit at the same time. It clearly-appears, therefore, that the proof required to establish each escape also establishes the corresponding unauthorized absence. Consequently, each group of offenses is not separately punishable. United States v Welch, 9 USCMA 255, 26 CMR 35; United States v Modesett, 9 USCMA 152, 25 CMR 414.

The decision of the board of review as to the sentence is set aside. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for submission to a board of review for reassessment of the sentence.

Judge Ferguson concurs.

Judge Latimer dissents.
EX-32(a)
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Union PlantersCorporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) I,Jackson W. Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.         By:                                        /s/ Jackson W. Moore    Jackson W. Moore, Chairman  Date: May 10, 2004  President and Chief Executive Officer   
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Union Planters Corporation and will be retained by Union PlantersCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that
certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2016, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION,
as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as
Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations
Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C1 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized
terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of
this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through
December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made
under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.



Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 
Wells Fargo Bank
No. 58201.

protest 209423-K (New York).

#### Basil C. Rodes *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, the plaintiff testified that he had caused the shipper to pack 85 pounds per barrel, rather than 100 pounds, and to fill the barrels up with certain specified percentages of brine. Documents were admitted in evidence to substantiate the testimony. However, according to the provision under which assessment was made, duty is directed to be taken upon the basis of the gallon. According to the gauger, the official return of quantity was 539 gallons of olives, upon which the assessment of duty was made. In view, of the fact that the evidence failed to establish that a lesser gallonage was imported than that returned in the official gauge of quantity, the action of the collector was held to be presumptively correct. The protest was therefore overruled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,955,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,067,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   429,000
<INVENTORY>                                 10,045,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,631,000
<PP&E>                                      24,679,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,066,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,562,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,553,000
<BONDS>                                      3,200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,503,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,651,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,562,000
<SALES>                                     31,329,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,329,000
<CGS>                                       21,123,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,420,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                96,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             475,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                909,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   402,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            507,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   507,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

April 13, 1950

No. 54237.

#### Ludwig Starck *v.*United States,

protest 843451-G (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:13-cr-291

Raul Higareda-Ramirez 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 41) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the indictment, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: October 20, 2014 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:13-cr-00291-JLG-EPD Doc #: 43 Filed: 10/20/14 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 183 

Recognizing the achievements and contributions of the Migratory Bird Commission on the occasion of its 72nd anniversary and the first day of 

sale of the 2005–2006 Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamp. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 28, 2005 

Mr. COCHRAN (for himself, Mrs. LINCOLN, and Ms. SNOWE) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the achievements and contributions of the Migratory Bird Commission on the occasion of its 72nd 

anniversary and the first day of sale of the 2005–2006 

Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamp.

Whereas the 2005–2006 Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamp, popularly known as the ‘‘Duck Stamp’’, 

marks the Migratory Bird Conservation Commission’s 

72nd anniversary; 

Whereas June 30, 2005, will be the first day of sale for the 

2005–2006 Duck Stamp; 

Whereas the Migratory Bird Conservation Commission was 

created by Congress in 1929 to consider and approve any 

areas of land or water recommended by the Secretary of 

the Interior for purchase or rental by the United States 
2

•SRES 183 ATS

Fish and Wildlife Service under the Migratory Bird 

Hunting and Conservation Stamp Act, and to consider 

the establishment of new waterfowl refuges; 

Whereas the Waterfowl Population Survey, operated by the 

United States Fish and Wildlife Service, is celebrating its 

50th anniversary in 2005 and is featured on the 2005–

2006 Duck Stamp; and 

Whereas since its inception in 1934, the Federal Duck Stamp 

Program has raised over $700,000,000 through the sale 

of Duck Stamps to hunters, stamp collectors, and conservationists to help purchase 5,200,000 acres of wetlands habitat for the National Wildlife Refuge System: 

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the achievements and contribu3 tions of the Migratory Bird Conservation Commis4 sion on the occasion of its 72nd anniversary and the 

5 first day of sale of the 2005–2006 Migratory Bird 

6 Hunting and Conservation Stamp; 

7 (2) expresses strong support for the continued 

8 success of the Migratory Bird Hunting and Con9 servation Stamp; 

10 (3) encourages the United States Fish and 

11 Wildlife Service in its efforts to broaden under12 standing of, and appreciation for, the Migratory 

13 Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamp and the Na14 tional Wildlife Refuge System by increasing partner15 ships on behalf of the National Wildlife Refuge Sys-
3

•SRES 183 ATS

1 tem that will contribute to increased growth and de2 velopment of the system; and 

3 (4) reaffirms its commitment to the National 

4 Wildlife Refuge System and the conservation of the 

5 rich natural heritage of the United States.

Æ
Resignation(Officer)


EXHIBIT 10.03

SHOTGUN ENERGY CORPORATION

(the “Company”)

 

Officer and Director Resignation

I hereby resign as Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, effective immediately.

Dated:  August 7, 2008

/s/: Robert Klein

Robert Klein
** **

(logo) C-III | C-III AssetManagement

 

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

**C-III Asset Management LLC**

 

 

Theundersigned, Barry Davis, President of C-III Asset Management LLC *(f/k/aCenterline Servicing LLC)*, the Special Servicer under that certain Poolingand Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2016, relating to the **CitigroupCommercial Mortgage Trust 2016-P3, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2016-P3**(the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”),hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.       a review of theactivities of the Special Servicer and of its performance under the Pooling andServicing Agreement during the calendar year 2018 (the "ReportingPeriod") has been made under the undersigned's supervision;

 

2.       to the best of theundersigned's knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer maintainedan effective internal control system relating to its servicing of the MortgageLoans serviced by it and has fulfilled in all material respects its obligationsunder the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Capitalized terms nototherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling andServicing Agreement.

** **

** **

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, as of the 1st day of March, 2019, I have hereuntosigned my name.

 

 

/s/ Barry Davis

**Barry Davis**, President

C-III Asset Management LLC, a

Delaware limited liabilitycompany

 

 

CGCMT 2016-P3