alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,473,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,258,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   323,000
<INVENTORY>                                  9,327,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,797,000
<PP&E>                                      25,230,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,931,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,887,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,569,000
<BONDS>                                      3,200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,575,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,293,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,887,000
<SALES>                                     14,857,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,857,000
<CGS>                                        9,710,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,211,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                25,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             187,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                646,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   211,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            435,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   435,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
APPENDIX "C"

PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

1. ARB Staff Rule Review Comments, December 16, 2013

2. ARB Staff Rule Review Comment, March 19, 2014

3. US EPA Region IX Rule Review Comment, April 2, 2014

AVAQMD Rule 701 C-1

Final Staff Report, 08/21/14
This page intentionally left blank.

C-2 AVAQMD Rule 701

Final Staff Report , 08/21/14
1. ARB Staff Rule Review Comments

AVAQMD Rule 701 C-3

Final Staff Report, 08/21/14
1.

C-4 AVAQMD Rule 701

Final Staff Report , 08/21/14
1. The district originally chose to amend AV Rule 701 at the January 21, 2014 Governing Board 

meeting. This action was published on December 20, 2013. The District took no action at the time on 

the proposed amendment. After further review, the District has decided to incorporate the ARB 

comment into the Rule and proceed with the amendment. Attachment 2 has been modified to reflect 

the PM criteria as developed by OEHHA and others for the Wildfire Smoke Guide.

1. District response to ARB Staff Rule Review Comments

AVAQMD Rule 701 C-5

Final Staff Report, 08/21/14
2. ARB Staff Rule Review Comments

C-6 AVAQMD Rule 701

Final Staff Report , 08/21/14
2. No response necessary.

2. District response to ARB Staff Rule Review Comments

AVAQMD Rule 701 C-7

Final Staff Report, 08/21/14
From: Steckel, Andrew 

Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 6:04 PM

To: eheaston@mdaqmd.ca.gov; Mike Guzzetta

Cc: Drake, Kerry; Law, Nicole

Subject: EPA comment on Antelope Rule 701

United States Environmental 

Protection Agency

Region IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

April 02, 2014

Transmittal of EPA Rule Review Comments

To: Eldon Heaston, Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District; 

eheaston@mdaqmd.ca.gov

Mike Guzzetta, California Air Resources Board

mguzzett@arb.ca.gov

From: Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief

steckel.andrew@epa.gov

Re: Draft Rule 701, Air Pollution Emergency Contingency Actions, dated 

February 12, 2014

We are providing comments based on our preliminary review of the draft rule identified above. We support the 

District's efforts to update the rule and lower the thresholds for episode criteria for particulate matter. Please direct 

any questions about our comments to me at (415) 947-4115 or to Nicole Law at (415) 947-4126.

- In Attachment 1 to the Rule on page 701-9, paragraph (b) should be edited to read that the health advisory 

episode applies only to Ozone and PM2.5 since the District is introducing a health advisory level for PM2.5 in 

Attachment 2 Episode Criteria. 

Saved as draft: 03/25/2014 03:15 PM

Submitted for review: 04/02/2014 04:46 PM

Review Completed/Ltr sent out: 04/02/2014 05:54 PM

Reviewer: Nicole Law

3. US EPA Region IX Rule Review Comment

C-8 AVAQMD Rule 701

Final Staff Report , 08/21/14
1. After further review, the District has decided to incorporate the US EPA comment into the Rule 

and proceed with the amendment. Attachment 1 has been modified to reflect the requested 

clarification in paragraph (b).

3. District Response to US EPA Region IX 

Comment Letter

AVAQMD Rule 701 C-9

Final Staff Report, 08/21/14
# C_2009049EN.01S00301.xml

| 28.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
#### F. C. Gerlach & Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6394.

Entry No. 703902, etc.

Invoices dated Birmingham, England, July 10, 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 17, 1942, etc.

(Decided September 30, 1946)

*Jordan & Klingaman*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon, the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
abc_ex1010.htm

EXHIBIT 10.10
   
 Compensation of Non-Employee Directors
  
 Compensation for our directors is discretionary and is reviewed from time to time by our Board of Directors. Any determinations with respect to Board compensation are made by our Board of Directors. On February 28, 2022, we adopted the following compensation plan for our independent directors who serve on our Board: a quarterly stipend of $7,500, with $5,000 and $2,500 payable in Company stock issued in arrears and cash, respectively. Additionally, the chair of our audit committee receives an additional quarterly stipend of $2,500 payable in cash. All directors are also entitled to reimbursement for travel expenses for attending director meetings.
(Reap. Dec. 8809)

#### Meadows Wye & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 886741, etc.

(Decided May 21, 1957)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Laweence, Judge:

The records indicate that there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached to and made part of this decision were called for hearing, and the cases were, consequently, ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any ease shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner,. or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the records in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for COMM 2015-LC23 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of November 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer'sknowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

/s/ Jeffrey Coletta

Jeffrey Coletta 

Assistant Secretary

 

  

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-12-0432

SAT Date: 7/6/2012

Print Date: 7/30/2012

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 1

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

2 21

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Inhalation 

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG, ONCO-LUNG

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-12-0432

FATE: 

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = U

Sorption to soils/sediments = strong - v.strong

PBT Potential: P2B2
*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl - slow

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes based on physical/chemical 

properties. There is concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled based on 

information for other poorly soluble respirable particulates and concern for oncogenicity if 

inhaled based on the expected 

oderate concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for SAR 

chemical class = MW > 100,000; pH7; 

effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness 

<150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

*

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
#### Jared C. Nash *& al., versus*Eri H. Drisco.

Tho construction of a written contract, inYolving the meaning of words used therein, is not a question of fact, but one of law.

In a contract for the purchase of “ timber,” the purchaser acquires no title to trees not suitable for any purpose but for firewood.

Exceptions from tho ruling at *Nisi Prius*of Davis, J.

This was an action of trespass.

*J. A. Milliken,*for the plaintiff.

*B. Bradbury,*for tho defendant.

The opinion of tho Court was drawn up by

Davis, J.

The plaintiffs purchased of the defendant, by a written contract or permit, " the right to cut and haul all the *timber*and bark” on certain premises, " down to as small as ten inches at the stump or but of the trees.” Under this the plaintiffs operated, cutting and. taking away timber for vessels, and for other purposes. And they also cut trees for firewood, and had it corded up, ready to be hauled away. While the wood was in this condition, the defendant, claiming that the plaintiffs had no right to cut it, took it himself, and appropriated it to his own use. For this, the present action of trespass has been brought.

The presiding Judge, in submitting the case to the jury, remarked, "that tho word *timber,*in its etymological sense, might embrace nothing but materials for building or manufacturing purposes ;” but that " the signification of the word was a question of fact for tho jury to determine.” The verdict was for the plaintiffs, and the defendant excepted to the instructions.

The signification given to the word "timber,” by the Court, was correct. The words from which it was derived, and incorporated into the English language, all relate to the *erection*or *construction*of buildings or chattels. Webster defines it as " that sort of wood which is proper for build*418ings, or for tools, utensils, furniture, carriages, fences, ships, and the like.”

Firewood, or what is sometimes called " cordwood,” cannot properly be said to be constructed or manufactured. The materials of which it is composed are not called timber, though timber might be used for that purpose. In a contract for the purchase of " timber,” the purchaser acquires no title to trees not suitable for any purpose but for firewood.

The construction of a written contract, involving the meaning of the words used therein, is not a question of fact, but one of law. The submission of it to the jury was therefore erroneous.

If there' had been any evidence in the case of any local or special signification, which the parties might be presumed to have adopted, the question might properly have been submitted to the jury. But there was no such evidence.

Or if the jury had determined the question correctly, a new trial would not be granted in consequence of its having been submitted to them. But, in the case at bar, the jury must have given to the word an erroneous meaning. The exceptions are therefore sustained, and a new trial is granted.

Appleton, C. J., Cutting, Walton and Barrows, JJ., concurred. .
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

MICHAEL MAVASHEV,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 No. 19-1701C

 (Filed: January 14, 2020)

ORDER

This action was initially brought in the Supreme Court of the State of New York and 

removed to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York on March 27, 

2019. ECF No. 1. On August 28, 2019, Judge Glasser granted the government’s motion to 

dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and directed the Clerk of Court of the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of New York to transfer this action to the Court of Federal Claims in 

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1631. ECF No. 29. 

On November 1, 2019, the case was transferred to the Court of Federal Claims from the 

Eastern District of New York, ECF No. 32, and on November 8, 2019, the Clerk issued the 

notice of filing, ECF No. 33. 

Pursuant to Rule 3.1(a)(4) of the Court of Federal Claims, “[w]ithin 28 days after service 

of the notice of filing, the plaintiff must file an amended complaint, conforming to the 

requirements of RCFC 5.5(d)(1) and setting forth the claim or claims transferred.” Plaintiff’s 

transfer complaint was therefor due on December 6, 2019. ECF No. 33. 

To date, no transfer complaint has been filed. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS

plaintiff to show cause by February 11, 2020 why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to 

RCFC 41(b) for failure to comply with the Rules of this Court or to prosecute this case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Elaine D. Kaplan 

ELAINE D. KAPLAN

Judge
No. 50642.

#### Protest 92707-K of Di Santo & Co. (New York).

*314Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the reliquidation of the entry herein involved is similar in all material respects to that in *Bel Paese Sales Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(15 Cust. Ct. 7, C. D. 932). In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited,'judgment was entered directing ihe collector to reliquidate the entry herein, refunding the duty established to have been taken in excess, in accordance with the decision and judgment in Abstract 44860.
Exhibit 4.2



 


 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated April 8, 2022, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2106 contained in Amendment No. 4 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-262220) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


April 8, 2022
T

E

X

A

S

T

E

X

A

S

KENEDY

C

O

KE

N

E

DY

C

O

K

E

N

E

D

Y

C

O

G U L F O F M E X I C O

G U L F O F M E X I C O

Potrero

Cortado

OE E

Potrero

Cortado

Yarborough

Pass

Potrero

Lopeno NW

Potrero

Lopeno

NW OE E

Yarborough

Pass OE E

6 70

6

99

91

94

E

000

93

01

69

27°

15'

90

89

6

FEET

27° 607'

00

27°

6

29

16

95

72

PQ

29

30"

6

94

PR

65

00'

20'

2'

29

000m 6

000m

15'

360

01

20'

92

390

29

96

97°

29

17'

29

71

89

88

29

6 000

66

30

1

22'

30

16

97°

PQ

99

29

30"

29

29

66

2'

96

29

67

6

PR

97

00' 6

00

000m

000

29

07'

29

930

30" 97°

6

29

71 73

29

90

6 FEET

29

29

91

6 6

17'

98

6

62

5'

64 6

6 68

30"

22' 63

000 6

N

30"

98

67 6

88

6

30"

29

30

70

29

E

000m

72

27°

29

900

29

95

6

1

93

97° 6

5'

62

63 FEET

30"

68

64 69 6 30"

N

FEET

30

65

29

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

POTRERO CORTADO OE E QUADRANGLE

TEXAS-KENEDY CO.

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

POTRERO CORTADO OE E, TX

2013

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Imagery..................................................NAIP, April 2010

Roads..............................................©2006-2012 TomTom

Names..........................................................GNIS, 2012

Hydrography....................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010

Contours....................................................Not Available

Boundaries....................Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2012

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 14R

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983 (south zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.7

CONTOURS NOT PRESENT BECAUSE AVAILABLE ELEVATION

DATA DO NOT MEET ACCURACY REQUIREMENTS

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

PR

PQ

30 00

14R

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2013 MAGNETIC NORTH

DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 46 ́

14 MILS

4° 11 ́

74 MILS
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Harbin Electric, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
certify pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date:  May 13, 2005                                   /S/Tianfu Yang
                                                       ---------------------
                                                       Tianfu Yang
                                                       Chief Executive Officer


Date:  May 13, 2005                                   /S/Zedong Xu
                                                       ----------------------
                                                       Zedong Xu
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
### Faulk, Scott (OST) Subject: FW: Macon ,GA
-----Original Message----- From: Greg Kahlstorf [mailto:gkahlstorf@gmail.com] Sent:Thursday, April 26, 2012 4:03 PM To: Devany, Dennis (OST) Subject: Macon, GA Dennis, ·-,I 1 '!

Please accept this 90-day notice of Pacific Wings' intenttoterminate unsubsidized service to Macon, Ga. effective 26 JUL 2012. We are taking this action due to the potential for USDOTto introduce federally subsidized competitors in EAS locations already receiving service at no costtothe federal government,just as the Department recently did in Kalaupapa, Hawaii. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Greg Kahlstorf Chief Executive Officer Pacific Wings Sentfrom my iPad

1
Before the Third Division,

April 6, 1950

No. 54215.

#### W. A. Gleeson *v.*United States,

protest 129463-K (St. Albans).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
- fplr2201-1
- fplr2201-2
- fplr2201-3
- fplr2201-4
- fplr2201-5
- fplr2201-6
- fplr2201-7
- fplr2201-8
- fplr2201-9
- fplr2201-10
- fplr2201-11
- fplr2201-12
- fplr2201-13
- fplr2201-14
- fplr2201-15