alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.7


 


AMENDMENT
TO REVOLVING LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Revolving Loan and Security Agreement dated April 28, 2011, as amended on July
26, 2014 and October 31, 2017 (the “Agreement”) is entered into this 31st day of January 2021, by and between Vaxstar
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Vaxstar”), and Netcapital Inc. (“Netcapital”), a Utah corporation,
with reference to the following:


 


READINGS/RECITALS


 


A.            The Agreement, as amended, contains a maturity date of January 31, 2021, and Netcapital
and Vaxstar desire to extend the maturity date to a time in the future.


 


B.            Both parties seek to amend the Agreement.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, of the mutual promises hereinafter set forth and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


Paragraph
9 (k) of the Agreement is amended to read:


“Maturity
Date” means April 30, 2021.


 


Paragraph
1. (d) (i) of the Agreement is amended to read:


Subject
to Section 7(b)(ii), the principal amount outstanding under the Loan Advances shall accrue interest from the date of this Amendment
until the Maturity Date at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum, compounding daily. Interest is not due until the Maturity
Date.


 


COUNTERPARTS:
This Amendment may be executed simultaneously in one or more counterparts, each of which when executed and delivered shall be
deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute a single agreement.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Amendment as of the date written above.


 


	Vaxstar LLC	 
	 	 
	Signature:		 
	 	Manuel Teixeira, Manager	 



 


	ValueSetters, Inc	 
	 	 
	Signature:		 
	 	Coreen Kraysler, CFO
December 15, 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

QUINCY LEE JOHNSON , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00018

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell ee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds tha t there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Case: 2:12-cv-00715-EAS-TPK Doc #: 37 Filed: 09/04/14 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T14:16:21-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Case: 2:12-cv-01194-EAS-EPD Doc #: 56 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T21:17:13-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
# Official Journal L 175/10 M

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 175 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4710 May 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 175

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4710 May 2004

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Committee of the Regions |
| | * | Rules of Procedure | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Committee of the Regions

*

Rules of Procedure

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# C_2008032EN.01001401.xml

| 6.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/14

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/124/08

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

(2008/C 32/05)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the open competition:

| | EPSO/AD/124/08 — Head of Unit (AD9) having as main language Dutch, French or German for the Information Office of the European Parliament in Brussels. |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/124/08 — Head of Unit (AD9) having as main language Dutch, French or German for the Information Office of the European Parliament in Brussels.

The competition notice is published in Dutch, French and German only, in Official Journal C 32 A of 6 February 2008.

Full details can be found on the EPSO website: http://europa.eu/epso

---
NOT RECOMMENDED F OR F ULL-TEXT PUBLICATION F ile Nam e: 11a0487n.06 Nos. 08-6374, 09-5047 UNITED STAT ES COURT OF AP P EALS F OR THE S IXTH CIRCUIT

UNI TED STATES OF AMERI CA, Plaintiff-Appellee ,

v. ANTON I O GOI

NS; W I L L IAM FREEMAN , Def endants-A

ppellants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON AP P E AL FROM THE UNI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT FOR THE WES TERN DI STRI CT OF KENTUCKY

BEF ORE: BOG GS, ROGERS, and W HI TE, Circuit J udg es. ROGERS, Circuit J udg e. These consolidated case s addre ssed whether defe ndants who wer e
sentenc ed pursuant to Rule 11(c) (1)( C) plea ag ree ments could qualify for sentenc e reduc tions based

on retroa ctive ame ndments to the S entenc ing Guidelines. Both Goins and Free man were charg ed wi t h dru g and wea

pon offe nses in 2005 and eac h enter ed a plea ag ree ment pursuant to Rule 11(c) (1)( C). The d i s t ri ct court acc epted the pleas and enter ed judgme nt. Subsequently , the Sentencing Commi ssion amende d the Guidelines to red u ce t h e disparity in the t reatment of crack and powder coca ine and made the amendment retroa ctive. See U.S.S.G. Appx. C, Amend. 706, id

. § 1B1.10. Goins and Fr eema n soug ht to have their sentenc es reduc ed, but the district court held that this circ uit’s prec edent in United States v. Pev eler , 359 F.3d 369 (6t h C i r. 2004), prec luded modification of a sentenc e i mposed pursuant to a Rule 11(c) (1)( C) plea ag ree ment. This court aff irmed. United States v. Goins , 355 F. App’x 1 (6th Cir. 2009). The Supreme Court subsequentlyNos. 08-6374, 09-5047

United States v. Goins

g rante d cer

tiorari and issued an opinio n i n Fr ee m an’s case , reve rsing this court’s decision and

rema nding the case . Freem an v. United States , No. 09-10245, 564 U.S. — (June 23, 2011). In light of that decision, the Court issued a summary order g ranting cer tiorari and rema

nding Goins’s case . Goins v. United States , No.09-10246, 564 U.S. — (June 28, 2011). We now rema nd both case s to the district court for

proce eding s consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

- 2 -
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer**


**pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted**


**pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002** ****











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NYFIX, Inc. for the
      quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), P. Howard Edelstein, as Chief
      Executive Officer of NYFIX, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to the best of his knowledge the Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NYFIX, Inc.







Dated:
      August 28, 2007





By:/S/
                P. Howard Edelstein
              P.
                Howard Edelstein
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer
----

**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                  MARK                  S. ROBINOW |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Mark                  S. Robinow                      |
|   | Chief                  Financial Officer              |

----
**Exhibit 12.1**

**302 CERTIFICATION**

I,Valter Moro, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Endesa Américas S.A.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: April 29, 2016
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Joseph F. Spanier, certify that:

   1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TransTechnology
Corporation;

   2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

   3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

   4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

   5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

   Date: November 12, 2003                /s/ Joseph F. Spanier
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Joseph F. Spanier
                                          Chief Financial Officer


                                       23
# Official Journal C 47A/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2014.047.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 47A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5719 February 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2014.047.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 47A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5719 February 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Medicines Agency |
| 2014/C 047A/01 | Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Medicines Agency

2014/C 047A/01

Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London)

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
No. 56135.

protest 169111-K/3059 (Chicago).

#### J. E. Bernard & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protest was dismissed.
# CE2004065EN.01025201.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/252 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/252

---

(2004/C 65 E/267)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2977/03

by Stavros Xarchakos (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(6 October 2003)

Subject:   High prices and inadequate veterinary inspections in Greece

Subject:

According to Greek consumer organisations and the Greek Ministry of Development prices watchdog body, consumer prices have increased steeply over the past year, while wholesalers (particularly in the agricultural sector) are coming under growing criticism for purchasing products cheaply in situ and selling them at very high prices, doubling or tripling the final amounts paid by consumers in Greece.

According to the most recent Eurostat data, per capita income in Greece amounts to scarcely 67 % -69 % of the Community average while salaries and pensions there are among the lowest in the EU.

Added to this, the strike by veterinarians and related professions in the livestock sector has left enormous gaps in the Greek meat marketing sector, legal livestock slaughtering having come to a halt in Greece (without the necessary veterinary inspections) and large quantities of meat are being imported (mainly from third countries) regarding which it is impossible to establish whether adequate inspections were carried out in the countries of slaughter.

What immediate action can the Commission take to ensure that the Greek authorities introduce price inspections which are effective (and not purely nominal as has been the case until now) and to impose heavy fines for price speculation? Is the Commission aware of the situation regarding meat marketing in Greece in view of repeated observations by Commissioner Byrne to the effect that health standards in Greek slaughterhouses and meat markets fall far short of those in other EU Member States?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(4 November 2003)

(4 November 2003)

The Commission is continuing to monitor the hygiene conditions in meat markets and slaughterhouses in Greece and refers the Honourable Member to replies already given this year to his Written Question E-1709/03 (1), and Written Questions E-691/03 by Mr Hatzidakis (2) and P-558/03 by Mr Papayannakis (3). The Commission has no special knowledge of the impact of the circumstances described in the Honourable Member's written question. It is writing to the Member State concerned to request information and will inform the Honourable Member of its findings.

1

2

3

Community consumer law does not provide for means to control prices for goods offered to consumers. It only stipulates by Directive 98/6/EC that the indication of the selling price and the price per unit of measurement offered by traders to consumers improves consumer information and facilitate the comparison of prices. Inflationary price increases however are not covered by Community consumer law.

---

(1)  OJ C 11 E, 15.1.2004, p. 217.

1

(2)  OJ C 222 E, 18.9.2003, p. 228.

2

(3)  OJ C 161 E, 10.7.2003, p. 226.

3

---
**AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

 JUDGMENT IN CIVIL CASE 

CHARLES J. SUMMERS : 

 : 

 Plaintiff, : Case No. 2:12-CV-689 

 : 

 v. : JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 : 

THE STATE OF OHIO, et al., : Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel 

 : 

 Defendants. : 

 

[] Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been 

tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. 

[] Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have 

been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. 

[X] Decision by Court. This action was decided by the Court without a trial or hearing. 

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED That pursuant to the October 26, 2012 

Opinion and Order, the Court GRANTED Defendant Ohio Governor John R. 

Kasich’s Motion to Dismiss. This case is hereby DISMISSED. 

Date: October 26, 2012 John Hehman, Clerk

 

 s/Betty L. Clark 

 Betty L. Clark/Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-00689-ALM-MRA Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/26/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# Instructions

# Input & Output

# Input & Output

# X-ing Impact

# half zone impact

# Curve Fit
October 21, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JOSHUA CORDELL HUR D , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00786

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
De-identified Clothes Dryer Data - Collected December 2007 for DOE Rulemaking

Updated: 4/11/2008Residential Clothes Dryer Shipments

Standard Electric 240 V Compact Electric Gas Target Actual

1993 3,674,000 1,156,000 1 70 

1994 3,838,000 1,239,000

2 70.08 

1995 3,823,000 1,169,000

3 70.08 

1996 3,947,000 1,193,000

4 70.24 

1997 4,115,000 1,195,000

5 70.33 

1998 4,482,000 1,307,000

6 70.17 

1999 4,865,000 1,444,000

7 69.7 

2000 5,027,467 1,480,000

8 71.6 

2001 5,037,118 1,384,000

9 70.5 

2002 5,319,898 1,490,000 10 70.9 

2003 5,622,260 47,000 1,616,000 11 70 

2004 6,159,145 51,140 1,660,000 12 56 

2005 6,329,966 56,514 1,707,000 13 55.99 

2006 6,246,068 55,974 1,614,000 14 55.99 

15 55.99 16 58.43 

Residential Clothes Dryer Market Share Efficiency Data 17 58.58 

18 58.58 

Electric Standard 19 55.4 

2005 2006 20 55.8 

Market share (%) Market share (%) 21 55.7 

3.01 - 3.09 26% 33% 22 56 

3.10 - 3.29 74% 67%

Target RMC into dryer 

Gas Average RMC into dryer 

2005 2006 Average EF 

Market share (%) Market share (%) SD 

2.67 - 2.74 25% 28% Percent EF change 

2.75 - 2.84 42% 44%

> 2.85 32% 27%

Effect of RMC on Residential ClotheEnergy Factor

5670

EFEF

Year Test

RMC into dryer (%) B

Shipments

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0010 COMMENT 14
Exhibit
10.17 


 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

   


 SCHEDULE A 


 LEGAL DESCRIPTION
OF THE PROPERTY 


   


 Schedule
Omitted 


   


 Certain
schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. Gold Royalty agrees to furnish a copy of any omitted
schedules to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 SCHEDULE B 


 DEED OF HYPOTHEC 


 


 Schedule
Omitted 


   


 Certain
schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. Gold Royalty agrees to furnish a copy of any omitted
schedules to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.