alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008282EN.01000201.xml

| 6.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 November 2008

(2008/C 282/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2870 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,40 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4438 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80650 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,9369 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5051 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 305,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6600 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,300 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 259,30 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7089 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,5175 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,7035 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,345 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9409 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,8609 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4858 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9746 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1342 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9037 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 611,32 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,4517 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7879 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,1390 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 141,56 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5367 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,710 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,6359 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,039 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7420 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,1905 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2870

JPY

Japanese yen

127,40

DKK

Danish krone

7,4438

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80650

SEK

Swedish krona

9,9369

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5051

ISK

Iceland króna

305,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6600

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,300

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

259,30

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7089

PLN

Polish zloty

3,5175

RON

Romanian leu

3,7035

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,345

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9409

AUD

Australian dollar

1,8609

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4858

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9746

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1342

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9037

KRW

South Korean won

1 611,32

ZAR

South African rand

12,4517

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7879

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,1390

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 141,56

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5367

PHP

Philippine peso

61,710

RUB

Russian rouble

34,6359

THB

Thai baht

45,039

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7420

MXN

Mexican peso

16,1905

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

NICOLAS LEE BUSH,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:13-cr-140

Judge Peter C. Economus

ORDER

There being no objections, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Dkt. 25) that Defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The Court accepts 

Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count One of the Indictment, on which Defendant is hereby 

adjudged guilty.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case: 2:13-cr-00140-PCE-NMK Doc #: 31 Filed: 07/30/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

LEROY COLLINS,

Plaintiff,

Civil Action 2:12-cv-1093

v. Judge George C. Smith

Magistrate Judge Deavers

WARDEN, LONDON CORRECTIONAL

INSTITUTION, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the December 7, 2012 Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 4). Following an initial screen pursuant to

28. U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Magistrate Judge recommended dismissal of Plaintiff’s purported

claims against Defendant Timmerman-Cooper for failure to monitor inmate complaints. (Id. at

6-7). Specifically, the Magistrate Judge concluded that Plaintiff failed to state a claim upon

which relief may be granted against Defendant Timmerman-Cooper because Plaintiff failed to

allege sufficient personal involvement and deprivation of a right secured by the Constitution,

both of which are required for a plaintiff to properly assert a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Id.

at 5-7).

In her Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge specifically informed the

parties that “the failure to object to the Report and Recommendation will result in a waiver of the

right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of

the District Court.” (Id. at 8.) The time period for filing objections to the Report and

Case: 2:12-cv-01093-GCS-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 01/22/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Recommendation has expired. No party has objected to the Report and Recommendation. 

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 

Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing objections has expired, the

Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 4). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims

against Defendant Timmerman-Cooper are DISMISSED. At this juncture, Plaintiff may

proceed with his claims against the remaining Defendants. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

Case: 2:12-cv-01093-GCS-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 01/22/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 13 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 13

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         relative to marriage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 14, 2005

  Mr. Brownback (for himself and Mr. Inhofe) introduced the following 
joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         relative to marriage.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. Marriage in the United States shall consist only of 
the union of a man and a woman.
    ``Section 2. Congress shall have the power to enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2008233EN.01S00301.xml

| 11.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
Case: 2:12-cv-00363-EAS-EPD Doc #: 16 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 1 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00363-EAS-EPD Doc #: 16 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 2 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00363-EAS-EPD Doc #: 16 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 3 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00363-EAS-EPD Doc #: 16 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 4 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00363-EAS-EPD Doc #: 16 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 5 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00363-EAS-EPD Doc #: 16 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 6 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00363-EAS-EPD Doc #: 16 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 7 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00363-EAS-EPD Doc #: 16 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 8 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T10:18:17-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Tank Car Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth P. Fischl, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



In witness whereof, I have executed this certification as of the
13thday of August, 2004.



/s/ Kenneth P. FischlKenneth P. FischlPrincipal Executive Officer
# Official Journal L 114/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.114.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 114 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5625 April 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.114.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 114

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5625 April 2013

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 344/2013 of 4 April 2013 amending Annexes II, III, V and VI to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 344/2013 of 4 April 2013 amending Annexes II, III, V and VI to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 , as adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) of Hancock Park Corporate Income, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jeffrey A. Cerny, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


/s/ Jeffrey A. CernyName:Jeffrey A. CernyDate:March 31, 2017
### PHANTOM 3 STANDARD Release Note

© 201 5 DJI . All Rights Reserved . 

### 2015. 12.22 Overview : 1. All
- in - O ne firmware version updated to : v1.3.0050 2. DJI GO app iOS version updated to: v 2.4.2 3. DJI GO app Android version updated to: v 2.4.3 

### What ’s New : 1. Improved battery reliability when using the aircraft in cold environments . 2. Optimized bat tery management. 

### Notes : 1. Users are advised to update all the Intelligent Flight Batteries with this All
- in - One firmware. 2. Do not power off the remote controller or exit the DJI GO app during firmware update.

### PHANTOM 3 STANDARD Release Note

© 201 5 DJI . All Rights Reserved . 

### 201 5 . 9 . 3 Overview : 1. All
- in - O ne f irmware version updated to : v 1. 0030 2. DJI GO app iOS version updated to: v 2.2.0 3. DJI GO app Android version updated to: v 2.1.0 

### What ’s New : 1. Added Intelligent Navigation Modes including Point of Interest, Follow Me and Waypoint. 

### Bug Fixes : 1. Wi
- Fi extender failed to respond during the linking process. 2. Users could not reset the W i - Fi extender password from the DJI GO app. 3. Users could not initiate the linking process from the DJI GO app. 4. Users could not customize the control stick modes in the D JI GO app
# C_2008323EN.01S00301.xml

| 18.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 323/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 323/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
TSD for U.S. EPA’s Proposed Numeric Nutrient Criteria for FL Inland Surface Fresh Waters

Appendix A-9: Memo to FDEP Regarding Interval and Equivalence 

Tests for the LVI 
TSD for U.S. EPA’s Proposed Numeric Nutrient Criteria for FL Inland Surface Fresh Waters

A9-1 

Appendix A-9. Memo to FDEP Regarding Interval and Equivalence Tests for 

the LVI 

MEMORANDUM Statistical Design 

136 NW 40th St. 

Seattle, WA 98107 

(206) 708-5048 

DATE: May 17, 2009 

TO: Nia Wellendorf and Russ Frydenborg, Florida DEP 

FROM: Leska S. Fore, Statistical Design 

RE: Impairment thresholds for LVI 

Objective 

Calculate thresholds and indeterminate range of values for LVI using interval and equivalence 

tests for the 2.5th and 5th percentiles of values for references sites. 

Results 

The intervals were wider for LVI than for SCI due to the smaller samples sizes. 

Table 1. Impairment Threshold Values for LVI, Values for Impairment, Undetermined 

and Reference Condition for a Single LVI Value at 30 Reference Sites 

Impairment 

Threshold 

Impairment 

Threshold LVI Value Impaired Undetermined Reference 

2.5th %tile 42 <33 33-48 >48 

5th %tile 47 <39 39-52 >52 

Table 2. Impairment Threshold Values for LVI, Values for Impairment, Undetermined 

and Reference Condition for an Average of Two LVI Value at 15 Reference Sites 

Impairment 

Threshold 

Impairment 

Threshold Average 

of 2 LVI Values Impaired Undetermined Reference 

2.5th %tile 46 <31 31-53 >53 

5th %tile 50 <37 37-57 >57
• 

August 17, 2011 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Docket Management System, 

400 ih Street, SW., Room PL 401, 

Washington, DC 20591-0001 

cc: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

New England Region 

12 New England Executive Park 

Burlington, MA 01803 

1 of 1 

GEnx/PAH/056/11 

Subject: Petition for Exemption to FAR 33.83(d) 

GE Aviation 

General Electric Company, BBC15 

P. 0. Box 156301, One Neumann Way 

Cincinnati, OH 45215-6301 

513 243-9478 

513 243-9478 FAX 

Email Paui.Hill1@ge.com 

bee: File/LB 

Reference: Letter, GEnx/PAH/034/11, dated 25 July 2011, "Petition for Exemption to FAR 

33.83(d) for GEnx-2B (all models) Aircraft Engines" 

Gentlemen: 

This letter cancels and supersedes letter GEnx/PAH/034/11, dated, 25 July 2011. 

The General Electric Company (GE Aviation Division) hereby withdraws the Petition for 

Exemption to 14 CFR Part 33 Section 33.83(d) for the GEnx-2B (all models) as requested in the 

reference (1) letter. 

Sincerely, 

() /} l ?a~ /-f. 

' 

Paul A Hill 

FAA-DER 

'Lf 'y /} 

l'~ 

Principal Engineer, Airworthiness&Certification 

cc: Mr. Robert Green, FAA (ANE-141)
145 of 290
146 of 290
147 of 290
148 of 290
149 of 290
150 of 290
151 of 290
152 of 290
153 of 290
154 of 290
155 of 290
156 of 290
157 of 290
158 of 290
159 of 290
160 of 290
161 of 290
162 of 290
163 of 290
164 of 290
165 of 290
166 of 290
167 of 290
168 of 290
169 of 290
170 of 290
171 of 290
172 of 290
173 of 290
174 of 290
175 of 290
176 of 290
177 of 290
178 of 290
179 of 290
180 of 290
181 of 290
182 of 290
183 of 290
184 of 290
185 of 290
186 of 290
187 of 290
188 of 290
189 of 290
190 of 290
191 of 290
192 of 290
193 of 290
194 of 290
195 of 290
196 of 290
197 of 290
198 of 290
199 of 290
200 of 290
201 of 290
202 of 290
203 of 290
204 of 290
205 of 290
206 of 290
207 of 290
208 of 290
209 of 290
210 of 290
211 of 290
212 of 290
213 of 290
214 of 290
215 of 290
216 of 290
217 of 290
218 of 290
219 of 290
220 of 290
221 of 290
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING LP, 

Plaintiff,

Case No. 2:11-cv-274

v. JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST

Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp

FALL OAKS FARM LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the December 28, 2015 combined

motion to stay and motion for leave to file additional pleadings filed by Defendant James Moder. 

(ECF No. 194.) In this filing, Moder again asks this Court to stay the foreclosure sale of the

property involved in this action. As he has done repeatedly, Moder bases this request on his

disagreement with this Court’s decisions and his continued characterization of the facts and the

law. But the Court has already repeatedly rejected the substance of these arguments and has

repeatedly recognized that the pleading stage of this case is over. The judgment of foreclosure in

this case was entered on May 2, 2013. (ECF No. 116.) Since that date, Moder has repeatedly

attempted to reopen the merits of this case and otherwise prevent the ordered sale through

duplicative motions practice. Moder has failed to present grounds warranting either additional

pleadings or a stay. The Court therefore DENIES the combined motion to stay and motion for

leave to file additional pleadings. (ECF No. 194.) 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Gregory L. Frost 

GREGORY L. FROST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case: 2:11-cv-00274-GLF-TPK Doc #: 195 Filed: 01/06/16 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-2358

___________________________

James Elmer Shaw

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Troy Ponto, Associate Warden, Individual and Official Capacity; Al Madsen, Unit

Manager, Individual and Official Capacity, Sam Badure, Unit Manager, Individual

and Official Capacity, Derick Bieber, Unit Manager, Individual and Official

Capacity, Jacob Glasier, Unit Coordinator, Individual and Official Capacity, Dr.

Mary Carpenter, M.D. (Health Services), Individual and Official Capacity; Dr.

Eugene Regier, M.D., Individual and Official Capacity; Heather Bowers, RN

(Health Services), Individual and Official Capacity; Audrey Shedd, Head Register

Nurse, Individual and Official Capacity

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court

for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls

 ____________

 Submitted: May 10, 2019

Filed: May 17, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, the district court1

adopted in part a magistrate

judge’s

2

recommendation to grant partial summary judgment on some of Shaw’s

claims, and following a jury trial, entered judgment on the jury verdict against him

on his remaining claims. On appeal, Shaw challenges only the partial grant of

summary judgment, arguing that the district court erred in determining that some of

his claims were barred by the statute of limitations and that the court failed to

recognize that his verified complaint was the equivalent of an affidavit for summary

judgment purposes.

We conclude that the district court did not err in finding that some of Shaw’s

claims were time-barred. See Bell v. Fowler, 99 F.3d 262, 265-66 (8th Cir. 1996)

(South Dakota’s 3-year statute of limitations appliesto § 1983 actions). Further, after

de novo review of the summary judgment record, including Shaw’s verified

complaint, we conclude that the grant of partial summary judgment was warranted. 

See Roberson v. Hayti Police Dep’t, 241 F.3d 992, 994-95 (8th Cir. 2001) (grant of

summary judgment is reviewed de novo; record is reviewed in light most favorable

to nonmoving party; verified complaint is equivalent of affidavit for summary

judgment purposes). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States DistrictJudge for the District

of South Dakota.

2The Honorable Veronica L. Duffy, United States Magistrate Judge for the

District of South Dakota.

-2-
#### S. Stern Henry & Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6733.

Entry No. 11989, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, September 1945, etc.

Certified September 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 3, 1945, etc.

(Decided January 9, 1947)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

An agreed set of facts, embodied in the stipulation of submission, establishes that export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff-Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. *282§ 1402 (d)), is the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values of the articles in question are the appraised values, less additions made by the importers on entry because of advances in similar cases.