alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Third Division,

August 13, 1943

No. 48671.

#### Protest 54796-K of Bertha Lewin (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

The official papers showed that the effects were imported on February 8, 1939, but entry was not made until August 22, 1940. The deputy collector testified on behalf of the plaintiff that all of the regulations attending free entry of household effects had been complied with and that said merchandise would have been entitled to free entry were it not for the ruling in T. D. 50171 (3). The plaintiff contends that the time limit set by the Secretary of the Treasury is not authorized by statute. The Government contends that the articles are abandoned and are not entitled to free entry because of plaintiff's failure to enter within 1 year after importation, as provided for in section 491, *243Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (T. D. 49668). Following *Werner*v. *United States*(10 Cust. Ct. 123, C. D. 735) judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TOREADOR
ROYALTY CORPORATION UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH
31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         264,506
<SECURITIES>                                 1,971,069
<RECEIVABLES>                                  522,146
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,133,347
<PP&E>                                      18,969,941
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,871,541
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,456,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,263,617
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    160,000
<COMMON>                                       881,886
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,530,560
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,456,063
<SALES>                                        631,016
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,274,678
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  979,398
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             176,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                119,173
<INCOME-TAX>                                    40,946
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             78,227
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    78,227
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 59/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.059.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 59 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 562 March 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.059.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 59

English edition

Legislation

Volume 562 March 2013

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 180/2013 of 1 March 2013 amending for the 188th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the Al Qaida network | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 181/2013 of 1 March 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 3 |
| | | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | | 2013/112/EU |
| | * | Commission Recommendation of 20 February 2013 Investing in children: breaking the cycle of disadvantage | 5 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 180/2013 of 1 March 2013 amending for the 188th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the Al Qaida network

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 181/2013 of 1 March 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

3

RECOMMENDATIONS

2013/112/EU

*

Commission Recommendation of 20 February 2013 Investing in children: breaking the cycle of disadvantage

5

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 118 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 118

    Recognizing June 2 through June 5, 2005, as the ``Vermont Dairy 
    Festival'', in honor of Harold Howrigan for his service to his 
               community and the Vermont dairy industry.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 21, 2005

   Mr. Jeffords (for himself and Mr. Leahy) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

                             April 27, 2005

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Recognizing June 2 through June 5, 2005, as the ``Vermont Dairy 
    Festival'', in honor of Harold Howrigan for his service to his 
               community and the Vermont dairy industry.

Whereas the town of Enosburg Falls, Vermont, will host the ``Vermont Dairy 
        Festival'' from June 2 through June 5, 2005;
Whereas the men and women of the Enosburg Lions Club will sponsor the Vermont 
        Dairy Festival, which celebrates its 49th year;
Whereas the Vermont Dairy Festival is a beloved expression of the civic pride 
        and agricultural heritage of the people of Enosburg Falls and Franklin 
        County, Vermont;
Whereas the people of Enosburg Falls and Franklin County have long-held 
        traditions of family owned and operated dairy farms;
Whereas the St. Albans Cooperative Creamery, Inc., which was established in 
        1919, is a farmer-owned cooperative;
Whereas Harold Howrigan served on the Board of the St. Albans Cooperative for 24 
        years;
Whereas Mr. Howrigan was the President of the Board of the St. Albans 
        Cooperative for 17 years;
Whereas Mr. Howrigan recently retired from his position as President of the 
        Board of the St. Albans Cooperative; and
Whereas Mr. Howrigan led the St. Albans Cooperative to uphold the region's 
        traditions and to meet future challenges: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate recognizes June 2 through June 5, 2005, 
as the ``Vermont Dairy Festival'', in honor of Harold Howrigan for his 
service to his community and the Vermont dairy industry.
                                 <all>
```
Case: 2:12-cv-01193-EAS-EPD Doc #: 55 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T15:51:43-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:12-CR-19

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEMP

GUILLERMINA JIMENEZ-JIMENEZ, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On January 26, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to Count One

of the Information charging her with reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1326(a)

and (b)(1). Defendant, represented by counsel, waived her right to appear on the matter before a

District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had

a basis in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of her right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:12-cr-00019-GCS Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/14/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count One of the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of

reentry of a removed alien. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:12-cr-00019-GCS Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/14/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1804/2006

of 7 December 2006         

laying down transitional measures to be adopted on account of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania in respect of the reserve drawn up in accordance with Article 46 of Regulation (EC) No 1043/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Treaty of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania,

Having regard to the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania, and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 41 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

By way of derogation from Article 47 of Regulation (EC) No 1043/2005, for the budgeting year ending 15 October 2007, the specified limit of EUR 75 000 mentioned in the first subparagraph of paragraph 2 shall not apply to applications from operators established in Bulgaria or Romania in respect of exports taking place in the period from 1 January 2007 to 28 February 2007.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force subject to and on the date of the entry into force of the Treaty of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania.

It shall expire on the 16 October 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 December 2006.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN            

Vice-President

----

(1)OJ L 172, 5.7.2005, p. 24. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1580/2006 (OJ L 291, 21.10.2006, p. 8).

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Toreador Resources Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that: the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

Dated: November 10, 2008/s/ NIGEL J. LOVETT Nigel J. Lovett
President and Chief Executive OfficerDated: November 10, 2008/s/ CHARLES J. CAMPISE Charles J. Campise
Senior Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer
(Principle Financial Officer)


The
foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
1

Order of September 21, 2012 Withdrawn, Appeal Reinstated and Order filed 

October 25, 2012 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00648-CV

____________

PATRICIA ANN POTTS, Appellant

V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES, ET AL, 

Appellees

On Appeal from the 257th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-24678

ORDER

This attempted appeal is from an order signed June 15, 2012, dismissing the 

underlying suit. On September 21, 2012, we abated this appeal for a determination of 

indigence and findings pursuant to section 13.003 of the Texas Civil Practice & 

Remedies Code. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 13.003(a). On October 12, 

2012, we were notified that pursuant to section 11.103 of the Texas Civil Practice and 

Remedies Code, Patricia Ann Potts has been declared a vexatious litigant and is therefore 
2

subject to the pre-filing order under section 11.101. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 

11.101, 11.103 (West Supp. 2012).

Under section 11.103(a), the clerk of this court may not file an appeal presented by 

a vexatious litigant subject to a pre-filing order under section 11.101 unless the litigant 

obtains an order from the local administrative judge permitting the filing, or the appeal is 

from a pre-filing order entered under section 11.101 designating a person a vexatious 

litigant. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 11.103(a) & (d) (West Supp. 2012). This 

is not an appeal from a pre-filing order entered under section 11.101. Accordingly, we 

withdraw our order of September 21, 2012, and reinstate the appeal.

This court will consider dismissal of this appeal unless appellant, within 10 days 

of the date of this order, shows that she has obtained an order from the local 

administrative judge permitting the filing of this appeal. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. 

Code Ann. § 11.103(a) (West Supp. 2012).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and Jamison.
1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2016-A Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and
 5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
  Date:  June 23, 2017
 By:/s/ Mark KaczynskiMark KaczynskiPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofNissan Motor Acceptance Corporation(senior officer in charge of theservicing function)
 9
No. 43062.

#### Protest 958456-G of A. Cohen & Sons Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The protest was submitted without the introduction of evidence in support of the claims made. On the record presented it was overruled.
(Reap. Dec. 8799)

#### Aeista Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 374299; 307649.

(Decided May 15, 1957)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Laweence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeals for a reappraisement were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff, and the cases were ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that — •

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser,

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

 v. 

JEFFREY A. JOHNSON, 

Defendant.

Case No. 2:13-cr-192 

Judge Peter C. Economus

ORDER

There being no objections, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Dkt. 26) that Defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The Court accepts 

Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment, on which Defendant is hereby adjudged 

guilty.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case: 2:13-cr-00192-PCE Doc #: 32 Filed: 11/19/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Appendix B 

Memorandum of Agreement among U.S. Army 

 Corps of Engineers, Charleston District; Federal 

 Railroad Administration or Other U.S. 

 Department of Transportation Agency; Palmetto 

Railways; Advisory Council on Historic 

Preservation; Muscogee (Creek) Nation; and the 

South Carolina State Historic Preservation 

Officer Regarding the Navy Base Intermodal 

Facility Project in Charleston County, South 

Carolina 
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Appendix B
Case: 2:12-cv-01181-EAS-EPD Doc #: 55 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T14:50:48-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a),

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brant Meleski, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of InfraREIT, Inc.; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: March 12, 2018 | /s/ Brant Meleski                                 |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Brant Meleski                                     |
|                 | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                 | (Principal Financial Officer)                     |