alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 76 (Friday, April 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19918-19919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7515]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-396-000]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

April 16, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 9, 2007, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
(Tennessee) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1, Ninth Revised Sheet No. 324, and Fifth Revised 
Sheet No. 324A, to become effective May 9, 2007.
    Tennessee states that it is proposing to add additional contract 
flexibility to the tariff provisions applicable to extension of long 
term firm service agreements.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practices and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the

[[Page 19919]]

appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. 
Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the 
provisions of Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 
154.210). Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or 
protest on or before the intervention or protest date need not serve 
motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#99dfdccbdad6f7f5f0f7fccaece9e9f6ebedd9fffcebfab7fef6ef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b7f1f2e5f4f8d9dbded9d2e4c2c7c7d8c5c3f7d1d2c5d499d0d8c1">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-7515 Filed 4-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          953859
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   736742
<ALLOWANCES>                                     28366
<INVENTORY>                                    2009258
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3901835
<PP&E>                                         3015712
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1371807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8321089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           969255
<BONDS>                                         269991
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      54097719
<OTHER-SE>                                  (46573563)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8321089
<SALES>                                        1682342
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1682342
<CGS>                                          1081242
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1790225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 16651
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 30904
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               11239
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (119859)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (119859)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (119859)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUIS VERDU-DEGREGORIO,

Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 15-73323

Agency No. A206-262-982

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Department of Homeland Security

Submitted September 27, 2016** 

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Luis Verdu-Degregorio, a native and citizen of Spain, petitions pro se for

review of the Department of Homeland Security’s (“DHS”) final administrative

removal order finding Verdu-Degregorio removable as an alien convicted of an

aggravated felony, after expedited removal proceedings pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 

FILED

OCT 05 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
§ 1228(b). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo

claims of due process violations. Singh v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir.

2004). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Verdu-Degregorio does not challenge the DHS’s determination that he has

been convicted of an aggravated felony that renders him removable under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii). See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010)

(issues not raised in an opening brief are waived). 

To the extent that Verdu-Degregorio contends that he did not knowingly

waive his right to appeal his removal order and request withholding of removal, his

due process claim fails because he does not explain how his due process rights

were violated in his signing of the waiver, nor did he establish any resulting

prejudice. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error

and prejudice to prevail on a due process claim).

To the extent that Verdu-Degregorio is collaterally attacking his underlying

state criminal conviction, we lack jurisdiction to consider this claim. See RamirezVillalpando v. Holder, 645 F.3d 1035, 1041 (9th Cir. 2010) (holding that petitioner

could not collaterally attack his state court conviction on a petition for review of an

agency decision).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

2 15-73323
(Reap. Dec. 8232)

#### Meakin & Ridgway, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 795217.

(Decided May 28, 1953)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley B. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon tbe following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the attorneys for the parties hei’eto, that the instant appeal to reappraisement covers 50 dozen earthenware plates, Newport Red Barn series, exported from Great Britain on or about May 8, 1947.

> That the said Newport Red Barn series plates were manufactured by William Adams & Sons, Tunstall, Stoke-On-Trent, Great Britain.

> That on or about the date of exportation of the instant merchandise such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption in Great Britain or for export to the United States. That on or about the date of exportation such or similar imported merchandise was not freely offered for sale in the United States.

> That the cost of production, as such cost is defined in Section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, for the said Newport Red Barn series plates was £6-8-0 per dozen.

> That the instant appeal is submitted on this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find tbe cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of the merchandise here involved, and that sucb value for tbe Newport Red Barn series plates was £6.8.0. per dozen.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# C_2008222EN.01000301.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 August 2008

(2008/C 222/05)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4735 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 160,22 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,458 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,805 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4381 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6164 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 122,35 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9435 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,735 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 237,68 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7035 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,3508 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,537 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,336 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7415 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7066 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,551 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,5034 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,089 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0846 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 602,8 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,3597 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0714 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,1515 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 482,53 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0003 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,76 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,2401 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,453 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4071 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,11 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4735

JPY

Japanese yen

160,22

DKK

Danish krone

7,458

GBP

Pound sterling

0,805

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4381

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6164

ISK

Iceland króna

122,35

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9435

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,735

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

237,68

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7035

PLN

Polish zloty

3,3508

RON

Romanian leu

3,537

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,336

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7415

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7066

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,551

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,5034

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,089

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0846

KRW

South Korean won

1 602,8

ZAR

South African rand

11,3597

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0714

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,1515

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 482,53

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0003

PHP

Philippine peso

67,76

RUB

Russian rouble

36,2401

THB

Thai baht

50,453

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4071

MXN

Mexican peso

15,11

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
EXHIBIT 13.1/13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with this annual report of
Globus Maritime Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Georgios Karageorgiou, President, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: April 30, 2013



|By: | /s/ Georgios Karageorgiou                                             | 
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Name: Georgios Karageorgiou                                           | 
|    | Title: President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
REVOLVING
      LOAN AGREEMENT

    AMENDMENT
      THREE

     

    Amendment
      Date: September
      24, 2007

     

    Amended
      Credit Limit: $25,000.00                

     

    RFG
      Acquisition I Inc., a Delaware corporation, promises to pay JOHN W. BRANCH
      (“Lender”), an individual, the amended sum of TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND and 00/100
      DOLLARS ($25,000.00) (the “Amended Credit Limit”) or such other principal amount
      that may be outstanding, in no case to exceed the Amended Credit Limit, as
      evidenced by the books and records of Lender. 

     

    This
      Agreement Three hereby amends the Credit Limit as defined in the Revolving
      Loan
      Agreement, dated November 20, 2006, as amended, by and among RFG Acquisition
      I
      Inc. and John W. Branch. All other terms and conditions of the original
      Revolving Loan Agreement, dated November 20, 2006, as amended, remain unchanged
      and in full force and effect.

    


    This
      Agreement Three is effective as of the date listed above.

    


    RFG
      Acquisition I Inc.

     

    By: 
      /s/
      David
      W. Matre 

    
      

    

    David
      W.
      Matre

    Chief
      Financial Officer  

     

    “Lender”


    


    /s/
      John
      W. Branch

    
      

    

    JOHN
      W.
      BRANCH, an individual

     

    DO
      NOT DESTROY THIS ORIGINAL AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
# C_2009007EN.01000501.xml

| 13.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 January 2009

(2009/C 7/06)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3394 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,48 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4527 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89560 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7605 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5005 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4130 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,570 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 279,40 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7058 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0430 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2770 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1114 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9478 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6021 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3867 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,3103 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9898 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 830,93 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,4237 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,1575 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3413 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 967,80 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7837 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,690 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,6005 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,819 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0656 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,3766 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,4230 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3394

JPY

Japanese yen

120,48

DKK

Danish krone

7,4527

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89560

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7605

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5005

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4130

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,570

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

279,40

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7058

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0430

RON

Romanian leu

4,2770

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1114

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9478

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6021

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3867

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,3103

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9898

KRW

South Korean won

1 830,93

ZAR

South African rand

13,4237

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,1575

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3413

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 967,80

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7837

PHP

Philippine peso

63,690

RUB

Russian rouble

41,6005

THB

Thai baht

46,819

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0656

MXN

Mexican peso

18,3766

INR

Indian rupee

65,4230

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
EXHIBIT 32

 

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Jean-Marc Allain, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of Trans-Lux Corporation (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

 

(1) The Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

            This Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Registrant or the certifying officer.

 

 

 

/s/ Jean-Marc Allain                

Date:  November 3, 2017                                            Jean-Marc Allain

President, Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Accounting Officer
CITY OF QGDENSBURG, NEW YORK 

dry Clerk's Office :': 

Oc-ARTMENTOF 

:;iN'SPORTAT!ON 

v;'-TOPERAT 

h A 11: OM 

November 9, 2010 

Mr. Dennis DeVany, Chief 

Essential Air Service Division 

USDOT 

Room W86-308 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

Enclosed please find a certified copy of a resolution passed by the Ogdensburg City 

Council on November 8, 2010. This resolution is in support of Cape Air Airlines as the 

proposal for Essential Air Service for Ogdensburg and the North Country. 

Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

Kathleen A. Bouchard, CMC 

City Clerk 

Enclosure 

CFTY MALI.' 330 FORD STREET* ROOM H4 • OGDENSBIJRC. NEW >ORK I3WW • (315) 3'J3-35i4(l • FAX (315) 3<)3-| 136 

www.o(;tlciishiir'; .()(•>; 
CERTIFICATION OF RESOLUTION 

At a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Ogdensburg, held on Monday, 

November 8, 2010, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, Ogdensburg, 

New York, at which meeting the following were: 

PRESENT: Mayor Nelson , Councillors Cilley, Morley, 

Powers, Sholette, Skamperle and Vaugh 

ABSENT: None 

The attached resolution was introduced by Mayor Nelson who moved its adoption, 

seconded by Councillor Morley to wit: 

The vote on the roll call resulted as follows: 

AYES: Mayor Nelson , Councillors Cilley, Morley, 

Powers, Sholette, Skamperle and Vaugh 

NAYS: None 

CARRIED, AYES ALL 

State of New York ) 

County of St. Lawrence ) 

I, Kathleen A. Bouchard, City Clerk of the City of Ogdensburg, New York, do hereby 

certify that the attached is a copy of a resolution passed by the City Council of the City 

of Ogdensburg, meeting in regular session November 8, 2010, and do further certify 

that it is a true and correct copy of and the whole of said original resolution is on file in 

my office in the minutes of the Ogdensburg City Council Meeting. 

IDATED: November 9, 2010 

Katiileen A. Bouchard, CMC 

City Clerk, City of Ogdensburg 
RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT 

OF CAPE AIR SERVICE PROPOSAL 

WHEREAS, the United States Department of Transportation has solicited 

proposals for Essential Air Service to the North Country, and 

WHEREAS, the community has judged Cape Air to best satisfy the air travel 

needs of the Ogdensburg area, and 

WHEREAS, Cape Air will provide EAS service to Albany and Boston, 

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Ogdensburg City Council 

hereby supports Cape Air, Option 1 for a 4 year rate, as the best proposal for Essential 

Air Service for Ogdensburg and the North Country, and 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk forward copies of this 

resolution to the Chairman of the OBPA, Mr. Dennis DeVany (USDOT), Renee 

Williams (USDOT), Congressman Bill Owens, and Senators Charles Schumer and 

Kirsten Gillibrand.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 71 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 71

Expressing the sense of Congress that States should require candidates 
  for driver's licenses to demonstrate an ability to exercise greatly 
   increased caution when driving in the proximity of a potentially 
                     visually impaired individual.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 15, 2005

  Mr. Akaka (for himself, Mr. Inouye, and Mr. Salazar) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                 Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that States should require candidates 
  for driver's licenses to demonstrate an ability to exercise greatly 
   increased caution when driving in the proximity of a potentially 
                     visually impaired individual.

Whereas many people in the United States who are blind or otherwise visually 
        impaired have the ability to travel throughout their communities without 
        assistance;
Whereas visually impaired individuals encounter hazards that a pedestrian with 
        average vision could easily avoid, many of which involve crossing 
        streets and roadways;
Whereas the white cane and guide dog should be generally recognized as aids to 
        mobility for visually impaired individuals;
Whereas many States do not require candidates for driver's licenses to associate 
        the use of the white cane or guide dog with potentially visually 
        impaired individuals; and
Whereas visually impaired individuals have had their white canes and guide dogs 
        run over by motor vehicles, have been struck by the side view mirrors of 
        motor vehicles, and have suffered serious personal injury and death as 
        the result of being hit by motor vehicles: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that each State should require any 
candidate for a driver's license in such State to demonstrate, as a 
condition of obtaining a driver's license, an ability to associate the 
use of the white cane and guide dog with visually impaired individuals 
and to exercise greatly increased caution when driving in proximity to 
a potentially visually impaired individual.
                                 <all>
```