alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
 








































 
 

  Exhibit 4(i)    
    


 PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY        P. O. BOX 2606        BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA    35202-2606  


 BENEFIT BASED FEE ENDORSEMENT

FOR

VARIABLE ANNUITY DEATH BENEFIT RIDERS  


        We are adding the following provisions to the Variable Annuity Death Benefit Rider attached to your Contract: 


        Benefit Cost—The cost for the death benefit is equal, on an annualized basis, to {0.10%} of the average death benefit value on
the Valuation Days described in the next paragraph. 


        Monthly Fee—Once each month while the Variable Annuity Death Benefit Rider is in force, we will calculate the fee for the
death benefit and deduct that amount from the Contract Value. The monthly fee is calculated as of the end of the Valuation Period that includes the same day of the month as the Effective Date, or the
last Valuation Period of the month if that date does not occur during the month for which the fee is being calculated. The fee is deducted from the Contract Value as of the next Valuation Period. 


        Calculating the Monthly Fee—We calculate the monthly fee using the formula below: 


Monthly Fee = [1 - (1 - {0.10%})1/12] × dbv, where 



        dbv = is the value of the death benefit as of the calculation date. 


        Deducting the Monthly Fee—We will deduct the monthly fee as of the Valuation Period immediately following the Valuation Period
for which it was calculated. The monthly fee will be deducted pro rata from the Allocation Options in the same proportion that the value of the Allocation Option bears to the total Contract Value. We
will not assess a surrender charge on these deductions and the deductions will not reduce any penalty free surrender amount available under the Contract. 



        Signed
for the company and made a part of the contract as of the Effective date. 


PROTECTIVE
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 



	
	

 
	Secretary




1











QuickLinks



Exhibit 4(i)
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Waterfowl habitat: key to many values: join us in the North American Waterfowl Management Plan

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Waterfowl habitat: key to many values: join us in the North American Waterfowl Management Plan 
                    -           Alternative Title        
                    -  North American Waterfowl Management Plan 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Forest ServiceU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  Forest Service, Dept, of AgricultureU.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  159 × 89 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  020437220.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
EXHIBIT 14.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-180313) pertaining to the 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan of Caesarstone
Sdot-Yam Ltd., of our report dated March 22, 2013, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Caesarstone
Sdot-Yam Ltd. included in its annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.



|/s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer |  | 
|-------------------------------- |  | 
|KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER     |  | 
|A Member of Ernst & Young Global |  | 
|                                 |  | 
|Haifa, Israel                    |  | 
|March 22, 2013                   |  |
Case No. 6,873.

#### HUMPHRIES v. TENCH.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 337.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Oct. Term, 1822.

Petition eor Freedom — Depositions as Evidence.

Depositions taken in another suit for freedom, 'by one of the same family, cannot be read in evidence as hearsay respecting the condition of their common ancestor.

Petition for freedom. The defendant offered to read the depositions in a record of Charles county court in Maryland, in a suit for freedom, by one of the same family of negroes, as hearsay, in relation to the common ancestor of that family.

Mr. Key and Mr. Caldwell, for petitioner,

•objected, and cited 1 Phil. Ev. 190.

Mr. Smith and Mr. Swann, contra,

cited 1 Phil. Ev. 174; Wheat. Dig. p. 153, § 16.

THE COURT

(nem. con.) said that the depositions could not be read in evidence, to prove the condition of the ancestor, (Airy.)

Verdict for the petitioner.
No. 59162.

protest 247810-K (B) (New York).

#### Morey Machinery Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
# C_2009014EN.01000401.xml

| 21.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5314 — Robert Bosch/Hägglunds Drives)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 14/07)

On 10 December 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5314. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5314. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Case: 2:12-cv-00734-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/19/13 Page: 1 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00734-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/19/13 Page: 2 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00734-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/19/13 Page: 3 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00734-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/19/13 Page: 4 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00734-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/19/13 Page: 5 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00734-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/19/13 Page: 6 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00734-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/19/13 Page: 7 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00734-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/19/13 Page: 8 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00734-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/19/13 Page: 9 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T20:56:38-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

CYNTHIA MACQUEEN TURNER 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT 

FROM INACTIVE STATUS 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 184 DB 2015 (No. 3 RST 2016) 

Attorney Registration No. 63077 

(Philadelphia) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 19th day of January, 2016, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated January 7, 2016, is approved and it is ORDERED that 

Cynthia MacQueen Turner, who has been on Inactive Status, has never been 

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, 

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the 

Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the 

Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation 

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
IIA 

Calendar No. 158

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 18

[Report No. 109–101] 

Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 

Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2005 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. LEAHY, 

Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. OBAMA, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. 

SARBANES, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. BURNS, Mr. 

CHAMBLISS, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. DEWINE, Mrs. DOLE, Mr. DOMENICI, 

Mr. ENSIGN, Mr. FRIST, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. KYL, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. 

SANTORUM, Mr. SMITH, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. BURR, Mr. 

DURBIN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. CORZINE, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. 

KOHL, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. KERRY, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. 

NELSON of Nebraska, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. 

LIEBERMAN, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. SUNUNU, and Mr. CHAFEE) introduced 

the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Finance 

JULY 12, 2005

Reported by Mr. GRASSLEY, without amendment 

JOINT RESOLUTION

Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in 

the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.
2

•SJ 18 RS 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Congress approves the renewal of the import restric4 tions contained in section 3(a)(1) of the Burmese Freedom 

5 and Democracy Act of 2003. 

Calendar No. 158

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 18

[Report No. 109–101] 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Approving the renewal of import restrictions conAct of 2003. tained in the Burmese Freedom and Democracy 

JULY 12, 2005

Reported without amendment
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v LOUIS R. SCHWARTZ, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant

19 USCMA 431, 42 CMR 33

*432No. 22,883

May 15, 1970

*Colonel Daniel T. Ghent*and *Captain Monte Engler*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Major Edwin P. Wasinger*was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

In part, the accused was convicted of a battery upon a stockade guard and attempted escape from confinement. At the trial, which was before a military judge, the two offenses were regarded as separately punishable. However, the circumstances of the commission of the offenses indicate they were so united in purpose and execution as to be “multiplicious for punishment.” United States v Pearson, 19 USCMA 379, 381, 41 CMR 379 (1970).

In his sentence argument, defense counsel contended that the circumstances should “prompt” the judge to “separate . . . [the accused] from the service as soon as possible.” There is no indication anywhere in the record that accused wanted defense counsel to argue for a punitive discharge as an acceptable lesser form of punishment. See United States v Weatherford, 19 USCMA 424, 42 CMR 26 (1970). To the contrary, there is substantial evidence that he desired to remain in the service. Thus, he pleaded not guilty to a charge of desertion, and he testified that when he absented himself he intended to remain away for a time and then “turn . . . [himself] in”; on cross-examination by trial counsel, he insisted that in escaping from the stockade he was not “really trying to get away from the Army.” He also testified that he had previously applied for a “rehabilitation program”; at that time he told a Lieutenant Nolan that he “wanted to go back to duty,” and that he “didn’t want the discharge,” which he had heard “they put . . . [him] in for.” It compellingly appears, therefore, that defense counsel’s argument was improper. Since the military judge did not stop the argument, or otherwise indicate that he would not take it into account in imposing sentence, there is more than a fair risk that he was influenced by it in adjudging a dishonorable discharge as part of the punishment. United States v Garcia, 18 USCMA 5, 39 CMR 5 (1968) ; United States v Mitchell, 16 USCMA 302, 36 CMR 458 (1966).

The decision of the United States Army Court of Military Review as to the sentence is reversed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for resubmission to the Court of Military Review. In its discretion, it may reassess the sentence, without a punitive discharge and with regard to the multipli-cious nature of Charges I and II, or it may order a rehearing on the sentence.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# When your child has flu or chicken pox -- check with your doctor before giving aspirin

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  When your child has flu or chicken pox -- check with your doctor before giving aspirin 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Food and Drug Administration 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. Food and Drug Administration 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  HHS publication ; no. (FDA) 84-3143 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 43 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018242865.jpg; 018242865.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Torotel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending January 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, H. James Serrone,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)       The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)       The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ H. James Serrone    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
|                    |   |
| H. James Serrone        |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| March 10,  2006         |   |
|                         |        |  |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v WALTER W. WELCH, Private, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

8 USCMA 315, 24 CMR 125

No. 10,479

Decided October 18, 1957

*Commander Charles Timblin,*USN, was on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*First Lieutenant Daniel P. Reardon, Jr.,*USMCR, was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

At the trial, defense counsel objected to the admission of a pretrial statement by the accused on the ground that it was obtained in violation of Article 31, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 831. The accused testified in support of the objection. The president of the court overruled the objection and admitted the statement but he did not at any time instruct the court members on their right to consider the question of voluntariness in their deliberations on the accused’s guilt or innocence. Under the circumstances, the omission constitutes prejudicial error. United States v Yearty, 8 USCMA 191, 23 CMR 415.

The decision of the board of review is reversed. The findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside. A rehearing may be ordered.

Judge Ferguson concurs.

Latimer, Judge

(dissenting):

1 dissent.

The mere mention by the accused of the term “involuntary confession” should not be used as a magic password which flings open the door to an appellate reversal. In the instant case, the record indicates that the issue of volun-tariness was not reasonably raised and, therefore, I do not believe that the law officer was required to instruct upon, that question. Furthermore, my evaluation of the record leads me to conclude that, aliunde the confession, the court-martial received compelling evidence of the accused’s guilt.

I would affirm the board of review.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 199 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 199

To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee on 
 Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
                                Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 18, 2005

     Mr. Frist (for himself and Mr. Reid) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee on 
 Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
                                Affairs.

Whereas the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on 
        Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs has been conducting an 
        investigation into the United Nations ``Oil-for-Food'' Programme;
Whereas the Subcommittee has received a number of requests from law enforcement 
        officials, regulatory agencies, and other governmental entities for 
        access to records of the Subcommittee's investigation;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be 
        taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate; 
        and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take 
        such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        pivileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the 
Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Homeland 
Security and Governmental Affairs, acting jointly, are authorized to 
provide to law enforcement officials, regulatory agencies, and other 
entities or individuals duly authorized by Federal, State, or foreign 
governments, records of the Subcommittee's investigation into the 
United Nations ``Oil-for-Food'' Programme.
                                 <all>
```
No. 65683.

#### A. Newberg & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/23370 and 60/27682 (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chewing gum similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fred L. Strauss*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 136, C.D. 2117), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
July 19, 1971

No. 71-29

#### Robert Stephen Todd, SA, U. S. Navy v RADM J. W. Williams, Jr., Commandant, Eleventh Naval District.

On consideration of the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition filed in the above-entitled action, it appearing that no action by the convening authority referred to therein tends to deprive this Court of its jurisdiction ultimately to review petitioner’s case, or upon review, to grant meaningful relief should such relief appear warranted, it is, by the Court, this 19th day of July 1971,

ORDERED:

That said Petition be, and the same is, hereby dismissed. 28 USC § 1651(a); United States v Best, 6 USCMA 39, 19 CMR 165 (1955); Priest v Koch, 19 USCMA 293, 41 CMR 293 (1970). This action is without prejudice to the right of *662petitioner to raise the issue herein presented by appropriate motion before the military judge, and at the various stages of appellate review should the same be considered necessary.