alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

99–011 2010

111th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 111–156 

ALTERNATIVE PLAN FOR 2011 LOCALITY-BASED 

COMPARABILITY PAYMENTS 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

ALTERNATIVE PLAN FOR 2011 LOCALITY-BASED COMPARABILITY 

PAYMENTS 

DECEMBER 1, 2010.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and ordered to be 

printed 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with HDOCE:\Seals\Congress.#13

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with HDOC
(1) 

To the Congress of the United States: 

The law authorizes me to implement an alternative pay plan for 

locality pay increases for civilian Federal employees covered by the 

General Schedule and certain other pay systems in January 2011, 

if I view the adjustments that would otherwise take effect as inappropriate due to ‘‘national emergency or serious economic conditions affecting the general welfare.’’ Our country faces serious economic conditions affecting the general welfare. As the economic recovery continues, the time has come to put our Nation back on a 

sustainable fiscal course, an effort that requires tough choices and 

shared sacrifice. Accordingly, I have determined that it is appropriate to exercise my statutory alternative plan authority under 5 

U.S.C. 5304a to set alternative January 2011 locality pay rates. 

This decision will not materially affect our ability to attract and retain a well-qualified Federal workforce. 

Under the authority of section 5304a of title 5, United States 

Code, I have determined that the current locality pay percentages 

in Schedule 9 of Executive Order 13525 of December 23, 2009, shall 

not increase from their 2010 levels. Pursuant to the Non-Foreign 

Area Retirement Equity Assurance Act of 2009 (sections 1911– 

1919, Public Law 111–84), I am also establishing applicable 2011 

locality pay rates for Alaska and Hawaii that are based on 2010 

locality pay levels. 

The locality pay rates established in 2010, and continued in 2011 

under this alternative plan, are shown in the attachment. 

BARACK OBAMA. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, November 30, 2010. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with HDOC
2 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with HDOCInsert offset folio 3 here HD156.001
# C_2008329EN.01S00301.xml

| 24.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 72 (Monday, April 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19024-19025]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7101]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,709]


Caraustar Industries, York Carton Plant; York, PA; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on February 14, 2007, applicable to workers of 
Caraustar Custom Packaging Group, Inc., Austell, Georgia. The notice 
was published in the Federal Register on February 27, 2007 (72 FR 
8794).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of folding cartons.
    New information shows that the correct name and location of the 
subject firm should read Caraustar Industries, York Carton Plant, York, 
Pennsylvania.
    Caraustar Custom Packaging Group, Inc., Austell, Georgia, the 
parent firm of Caraustar Industries, was inadvertently stated as the 
subject firm of this investigation in the original certification and is 
not the subject firm of this investigation.
    The investigation that was conducted was correctly conducted on 
behalf of the workers of Caraustar Industries, York Carton Plant, York, 
Pennsylvania.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to 
correct the subject firm name, city and State.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Caraustar Industries, York Carton Plant who were adversely 
affected by customer imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-60,709 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Caraustar Industries, York Carton Plant, York, 
Pennsylvania, who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after December 20, 2005 through February 14, 2009, 
are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of 
the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for 
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.


[[Page 19025]]


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of April 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-7101 Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT OSAM A M IKHO OR

AHA, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 14-72123 Age n c y No. A096-742-979 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d M a

rc h 15, 2016 * * B e fore : GOODW IN, LEAVY, a nd C HR ISTEN, C irc uit Judge s. Osam a M ikho Ora

ha , a native of Ira q a

nd c itiz e n of C ana da , pe titions for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ orde r dism issing his a p pe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de nia l of his m otion to re ope n. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re v ie w for a buse of disc re tion thede nia l of a m otion to re ope n. 

# FIL ED MAR 22 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).Mohamme d

v . Gonzale

s , 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th C ir. 2005). W e de ny the pe tition for re vie w. The a ge n c y

did not a b u se its disc re tion by

de ny ing a s untim e ly

Oraha ’ s m otion to re o pe n o n

the ba sis of ine ffe c tive a ssista nc e of c ounse l, whe re he file d the m otion ove r two y e ars a fte r his fina l orde r of re m ova l, se e 8 C .F.R . § 1003.23(b)(1), a

nd he fa ile d to de m onstra te the due dilige nc e ne c e ssa ry to warran t e quita

ble tolling of the filing de a dline , se e Av agy an v . Holde r , 646 F.3d 672, 679 (9th C ir. 2011) (e quita ble tolling is a

va ila ble whe n a

pe titione r ha s e xe rc ise d due or re a sona

b le dilige nc e and tolling pe riod should end . . .whe n pe titione r de finitive l y

le arns of the ha

rm re sulting from

c ounse l’ s de fic ie n c y , or obta ins vita l inform ation be aring on the e x iste nc e of his c la im (inte rna l quota tion m arks a nd c ita tion omitte d)). B e c a use untim e line ss is dispositive , we do not re a c h Oraha ’ s re m a i ning c onte ntions re g arding e ligibility for re lie f from

re m ova l. Se e Sime onov

v . Ashc roft , 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th C ir. 2004) (“ As a ge ne ra l rule c o urts . . . a

re not re quire d to m ake findings on issue s the de c ision of whic h is unne c e ssa ry to the re sults the y re a c h.” ). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 4 - 7 2 1 2 3 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRADLEY RYAN GRIM,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 1 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
### Slip Op. 99-30 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
UMA IRON & STEEL CO., ETAL. , Plaintiffs,

v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. BEFORE: DiCarlo, Senior Judge Consol. Ct. No. 91-11-00825

JUDGMENT ORDER The United States Department of Commerce submitted its Results of Redetermination in accordance with this Court’s Remand order of May 13, 1994, in the case of Uma Iron and Steel Co., et al. v. United States , Consolidated Court No. 91-11-00825. The Department of Commerce requested this remand pursuant to the remand from the Court in Creswell Trading Company, Inc., et al. v. United States , Consol. Court No. 91-01-00012, Slip Op. 98- 87. In its Redetermination of the 1988 administrative review, Commerce recalculated the company-specific subsidy rates by revising the rates relating to India’s International Price Reimbursement Scheme (IPRS). The rates, however, did not change. Accordingly, the rates applicable to the 1988 period of review are as follows: Uma Iron & Steel Co. 10.03% Govind Steel 14.08% All Others 4.10% These rates have been stipulated to and accepted by all parties to this action.Consol. Ct. No. 91-11-00825 Page 2 The Court having reviewed the Redetermination Results, Commerce having complied with the Court’s Remand, and the parties having stipulated to the rates, it is hereby ORDERED that the Redetermination Results are affirmed; and it is further ORDERED that the rates listed above shall be the rates for the 1988 period, and it is further ORDERED that, as the parties have stipulated that they will not litigate any other issues, this action is dismissed.

___________________________ Dominick L. DiCarlo Senior Judge Dated: New York, New York April 1, 1999
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army—U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability. 

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District (Regulatory Division), in coordination with the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), has completed a Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Hemet/San Jacinto Integrated Recharge and Recovery Project. EMWD requires authorization pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act for 15.9 acres of fill into waters of the U.S. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Questions or comments concerning the Final EIS should be directed to Dr. Daniel P. Swenson, Regulatory Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, P.O. Box 532711, Los Angeles, CA, 90053, (213) 452-3414. Comments should be submitted no later than May 10, 2007. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None. 

Mark Durham, 

Acting Chief, Regulatory Division.

[FR Doc. E7-6723 Filed 4-9-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710-KF-P
Date 3/26/10 Page of



### POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT

Summary Page

Chemical ID: P090478
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5772] 

*Summary:*                     Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Treasures from the Hermitage and Guggenheim Collections”, imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Guggenheim-Hermitage Museum, Las Vegas, Nevada, from on or about May 25, 2007, until on or about February 29, 2008, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

*For Further Information Contact:*                     For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Wolodymyr Sulzynsky, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202) 453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.                 

Dated: April 5, 2007. 

C. Miller Crouch, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E7-7040 Filed 4-12-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

of Boardwalk Pipelines, LLC

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(as adopted by Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned chief financial officer of Boardwalk Pipelines, LLC (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/  Jamie L. Buskill



Jamie L. Buskill

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

Boardwalk Pipelines, LLC

May 5, 2005
# C_2008298EN.01000201.xml

| 21.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 November 2008

(2008/C 298/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2542 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 119,87 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4524 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,8421 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2395 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,529 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 245 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,87 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,635 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 269,94 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,85 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,817 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,38 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1354 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9927 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5814 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7202 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,3209 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9176 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 892,24 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,2315 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5718 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,135 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 363,95 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5446 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,76 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,5555 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,079 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0198 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9003 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2542

JPY

Japanese yen

119,87

DKK

Danish krone

7,4524

GBP

Pound sterling

0,8421

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2395

CHF

Swiss franc

1,529

ISK

Iceland króna

245

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,87

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,635

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

269,94

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,85

RON

Romanian leu

3,817

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,38

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1354

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9927

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5814

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7202

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,3209

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9176

KRW

South Korean won

1 892,24

ZAR

South African rand

13,2315

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5718

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,135

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 363,95

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5446

PHP

Philippine peso

62,76

RUB

Russian rouble

34,5555

THB

Thai baht

44,079

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0198

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9003

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Mary L. Sherman,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 2:12-cv-738

Commissioner of Social

Security,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the court for consideration of the

October 21, 2013, report and recommendation of the United States

magistrate judge to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §636(b). See Doc. 21. The magistrate judge recommended

that the court grant the plaintiff’s motion for an award of

attorney fees and costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice

Act, but that the hourly amount be reduced to the statutory rate of

$125 per hour, resulting in an award in the amount of $2,375.00. 

The magistrate judge further recommended that the court issue no

order as to how that award must be paid.

The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties

that the failure to object to the report and recommendation within

fourteen days of the report would result in a “waiver of the right

to de novo review by the District Judge and of the right to appeal

the decision of the District Court[.]” Doc. 21, p. 7. The time

period for filing objections to the report and recommendation has

expired, and no party has objected to the report and

recommendation.

The court has reviewed the report and recommendation of the

Case: 2:12-cv-00738-JLG-EPD Doc #: 22 Filed: 11/08/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
magistrate judge. Noting that no objections have been filed and

that the time for filing such objections has expired, the court

adopts the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc.

21). Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees and costs

(Doc. 18) is granted. However, plaintiff will be awarded attorney

fees based on the statutory rate of $125 per hour. Plaintiff is

hereby awarded attorney fees and costs under the Equal Access to

Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §2412, in the amount of $2,375.00.

Date: November 8, 2013 s/James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge 

2

Case: 2:12-cv-00738-JLG-EPD Doc #: 22 Filed: 11/08/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 40189 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Alexander Yovani Galvez,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:20

- CR

- 1456

- 1

Before **King, Costa,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alexander Yovani Galvez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Galvez has not filed a response. We

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 23, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-40189 Document: 00516026701 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/23/2021No. 21

- 40189

2 have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appella te review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 21-40189 Document: 00516026701 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/23/2021
Case: 2:12-cv-01078-EAS-TPK Doc #: 44 Filed: 08/12/15 Page: 1 of 11 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-01078-EAS-TPK Doc #: 44 Filed: 08/12/15 Page: 2 of 11 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-01078-EAS-TPK Doc #: 44 Filed: 08/12/15 Page: 3 of 11 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-01078-EAS-TPK Doc #: 44 Filed: 08/12/15 Page: 4 of 11 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-01078-EAS-TPK Doc #: 44 Filed: 08/12/15 Page: 5 of 11 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-01078-EAS-TPK Doc #: 44 Filed: 08/12/15 Page: 6 of 11 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-01078-EAS-TPK Doc #: 44 Filed: 08/12/15 Page: 7 of 11 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-01078-EAS-TPK Doc #: 44 Filed: 08/12/15 Page: 8 of 11 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-01078-EAS-TPK Doc #: 44 Filed: 08/12/15 Page: 9 of 11 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-01078-EAS-TPK Doc #: 44 Filed: 08/12/15 Page: 10 of 11 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-01078-EAS-TPK Doc #: 44 Filed: 08/12/15 Page: 11 of 11 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 39020.

#### Protest 748811-G of Andre Debrie, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was found that the cameras in question would not function without the finders and that these finders are “integral, constituent, or component parts” thereof, and necessary to their proper operation. *United States*v. *Willoughby Camera Stores*(21 C. C. P. A. 322, T. D. 46851) cited. On the authority of *Paramount Public*v. *United States*(T. D. 46956) it was found that the tripods are dutiable as parts of cameras. The claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1551 was sustained. *United States*v. *Zeiss*(24 C. C. P. A. 145, T. D. 48624) cited.