alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### G. Tawara *v.*United States

No. 7530.

Entry Nos. 5823; 5986; 6369.

Invoices dated Yokohama, Japan, January 23, 1941, etc.

Certified January 23, 1941, etc.

Entered at San Francisco, Calif., February 10, 1941, etc.

(Decided February 6, 1948)

*Harper & Harper (George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*377OliveR, Presiding Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated as follows between counsel for plaintiff (s) and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, concerning the merchandise referred to herein:

> (1) That this stipulation is limited to so much of said merchandise as is described in the invoices as clams in 5-ounce cans or tins, such items being marked *“A”*and initialed by Examiner R. R. Lee (RRL), said article being appraised on the basis of the American selling price in accordance with the Presidential proclamation published in TD 47031.

> (2) That said merchandise is the same in all material respects as the imported clams involved in *United States*v. *Mutual Supply Co.,*and *Mutual Supply Co.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 5950, and in *Cherry Co. Ltd.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 6047, and that the issues herein are the same-in all material respetíts as the issues involved in said decisions.

> (3) That upon the dates of exportation to the United States of the merchandise covered by these appeals, like or similar merchandise manufactured or produced in the United States was being freely offered for sale and sold to all purchasers in the principal market of the United States in the ordinary course of trade and in the usual wholesale quantities, including all containers and coverings and all costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for delivery, at the following prices per dozen cans or tins, less a cash discount of 1)4 percent:

> 5-ounee size: January 1, 1941 to March 15, 1941_$1.00 per doz.

> March 16, 1941 to June 30, 1941....$1.05 “ “

> (4)That the records in said RD’s 5950 and 6047 may be incorporated herein and that upon this stipulation these appeals may be deemed submitted, they being limited to the items marked *“A”*on the invoices and abandoned as to all other merchandise.

On tbe agreed facts I find tbe American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402 (g) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, to be.tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of the merchandise described on tbe invoices as clams in 5-ounce cans or tins, and marked “A” and initialed “RRL” by Examiner R. R. Lee, and that such values, for merchandise exported during tbe specified periods, are as follows:

> *5-ounce sire Per doren V. S. dollars*

> January 1, 1941 to March 15, 1941_ 1. 00

> March 16, 1941 to June 30, 1941__„.. 1. 05

> less 1)4 per centum cash discount

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent tbe appeals are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

ANTHONY BARRETT,

Petitioner,

CASE NO. 2:15-CV-02876

CRIM. NO. 2:11-CR-00173(1)

JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY

v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEMP

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

OPINION AND ORDER

On October 7, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation

recommending that the instant motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2255 be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for

authorization forfiling as a successive petition. Although the partieswere advised of the right to

object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing

to do so, no objections have been filed.

The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 137) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. The

motion (ECF No. 136) is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States Court Appeals for the

Sixth Circuit for authorization for filing as a successive petition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ALGENJ

United Swrtes DistrictJudge"

Case: 2:11-cr-00173-ALM-EPD Doc #: 139 Filed: 11/13/15 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 65680.

#### Frederik Lunning, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/15 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vases in mineral colors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62694, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S><C><C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>

THIS DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE TJ INTERNATIONAL, INC. BALANCE SHEET AT JULY 4, 1998, AND FROM
ITS STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 4, 1998. 
THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                      <C>              <C>          
<PERIOD-TYPE>            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JAN-02-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                    139,980
<SECURITIES>                                    0 
<RECEIVABLES>                              88,889
<ALLOWANCES>                                  394
<INVENTORY>                                77,548
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          320,491
<PP&E>                                    616,603
<DEPRECIATION>                            240,310
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            733,384
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      80,216
<BONDS>                                   142,390
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                13,405
<COMMON>                                   17,947
<OTHER-SE>                                217,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              733,384
<SALES>                                   379,190
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          379,190
<CGS>                                     274,587
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             274,587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           57,903
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          4,539
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            23,851
<INCOME-TAX>                                8,944
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        14,907
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               14,907
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 .85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .79

        

</TABLE>
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

ROSEANN MORRISON, D.P.M.,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

CASE NO. 2:11-cv-1002

KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH P. DEAVERS

Defendant.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed June 28, 2013, this case is REMANDED to

the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services for a

decision on the merits regarding whether the Secretary’s overpayment calculation was

correct. This case is closed.

Date: June 28, 2013 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:11-cv-01002-EAS-EPD Doc #: 12 Filed: 06/28/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 46888.

#### Protests 804469-G (A), etc., of Fish Schurman Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the microscopic cover glass in question is similar to that the subject of *United States*v. *Clay Adams*(T. D. 48625) it was held dutiable at the appropriate rate according to area under the provisions of paragraph 219 as claimed.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

SONTAY T. SMOTHERMAN, 

 

 Petitioner, Civ. No. 2:14-cv-972 

 Crim. No. 2:12-cr-055(3) 

 v. Judge Frost 

 Magistrate Judge King 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Respondent. 

ORDER 

 On April 24, 2015, the Magistrate Judge denied Petitioner’s Motion for Discovery, ECF 

No. 281, and recommended that Petitioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 276, and 

Motion for Relief from Judgment, ECF No. 280, be denied and that the Motion to Vacate

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, ECF No. 270, be dismissed. Order and Report and

Recommendation, ECF No. 287. On May 6, 2015, this Court denied Petitioner’s objections to 

the recommendation and dismissed the Motion to Vacate. Order, ECF No. 291. The Court 

thereafter denied Petitioner’s amended objections to the recommendation, denied Petitioner’s 

Motion for Plain Error Review to Report and Recommendation and denied Petitioner’s motion to 

reconsider the Magistrate Judge’s denial of Petitioner’s request to conduct discovery. Order, 

ECF No. 294. This matter is now before the Court on Petitioner’s motion to reconsider, ECF No. 

296. 

 In his most recent motion to reconsider, Petitioner asks only that he be permitted to 

reargue his objections and motions; he does not suggest what those arguments might be. 

 Northing stated in Petitioner’s most recent motion to reconsider persuades the Court that 

its prior orders, or the dismissal of this action under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, were erroneous. 

Case: 2:12-cr-00055-GLF-TPK Doc #: 297 Filed: 05/15/15 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2 

 Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 296, is therefore DENIED.

 /s/ GREGORY L. FROST 

 GREGORY L. FROST 

 United States District Judge 

Case: 2:12-cr-00055-GLF-TPK Doc #: 297 Filed: 05/15/15 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7220

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff – Appellee, 

 v. 

DIRK LADSON, 

 Defendant – Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:93-cr-00162-RAJ-10) 

Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 20, 2008 

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Dirk Ladson, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Dirk Ladson appeals the district court’s order denying 

his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. See United States v. Ladson, 

No. 2:93-cr-00162-RAJ-10 (E.D. Va. filed June 11, 2008; entered 

June 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

 AFFIRMED
110 STAT. 3172 PUBLIC LAW 104–258—OCT. 9, 1996

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2869:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–512 (Comm. on Commerce).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

Apr. 16, considered and passed House.

Sept. 27, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–258

104th Congress

An Act

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric project

in the State of Kentucky.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION

DEADLINE FOR HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT IN

KENTUCKY.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period specified

in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would

otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Project No. 6641, the Commission shall, at the request of the

licensee for the project, in accordance with the good faith, due

diligence, and public interest requirements of that section and the

Commission’s procedures under that section, extend until June

15, 1998, the time period during which the licensee is required

to commence construction of the project.

(b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall take effect on the

expiration of the extension, issued by the Commission under section

13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), of the period required

for commencement of construction of the project described in subsection (a).

(c) REINSTATMENT OF LICENSE.—The Commission is authorized

to reinstate the license for the project referred to in subsection

(a), effective as of the date of its expiration or termination.

Approved October 9, 1996.

Oct. 9, 1996

[H.R. 2869]
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 283 

Recognizing the contributions of Korean Americans to the United States 

and encouraging the celebration of ‘‘Korean American Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 20, 2005 

Mr. ALLEN (for himself and Mr. DURBIN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the contributions of Korean Americans to the 

United States and encouraging the celebration of ‘‘Korean American Day’’. 

Whereas on January 13, 1903, the arrival of 102 pioneer immigrants to the United States initiated the first chapter 

of Korean immigration to the United States; 

Whereas members of the early Korean American community 

served with distinction in the Armed Forces of the 

United States during World War I, World War II, and 

the conflict in Korea; 

Whereas in the early 1950s, thousands of Koreans, fleeing 

from war, poverty, and desolation, came to the United 

States seeking opportunities; 
2 

•SRES 283 IS

Whereas Korean Americans, like waves of immigrants to the 

United States before them, have taken root and thrived 

as a result of strong family ties, robust community support, and countless hours of hard work; 

Whereas the contributions of Korean Americans to the 

United States include the invention of the first beating 

heart operation for coronary artery heart disease, development of the nectarine, a 4-time Olympic gold medalist, 

and achievements in engineering, architecture, medicine, 

acting, singing, sculpture, and writing; 

Whereas Korean Americans play a crucial role in maintaining 

the strength and vitality of the United States-Korean 

partnership; 

Whereas the centennial year of 2003 marked an important 

milestone in the now more than 100-year history of Korean immigration; and 

Whereas the Centennial Committees of Korean Immigration 

and Korean Americans have designated January 13th of 

each year as ‘‘Korean American Day’’ to memorialize the 

more than 100-year journey of Korean Americans in the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of a ‘‘Korean 

3 American Day’’; 

4 (2) commemorates the 103rd anniversary of the 

5 arrival of the first Korean immigrants to the United 

6 States; and 

7 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

8 to— 
3 

•SRES 283 IS

1 (A) share in such commemoration in order 

2 to greater appreciate the valuable contributions 

3 Korean Americans have made to the United 

4 States; and 

5 (B) to observe ‘‘Korean American Day’’ 

6 with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and ac7 tivities. 

Æ
Order entered June 1 6 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00349
- CV
DAVID AND WENDY MEIS ENBACH LIMITED PARTN ERSHIP, Appellant s V. SAMEER P. SETHI, SET HI OPERATING COMPANY , AND SETHI PETROLEU M,

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Appellee s On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429
- 01149
- 2014



### O RDER
The Court has been notified that the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas has rendered an order appointing a receiver in a case involving the appellees. Pursuant to that May 14, 2015 order, further action is this proceeding is stayed. Accordingly, we ABATE this appeal

. For administrative purposes, the appeal will be treated as a closed case. It may be reinstated on motion by any party showing the stay has been lifte d and specifying what further action, if any, is required from this Court.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 72 (Monday, April 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7114]



[[Page 19023]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail Advisory Council; 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, that a meeting of the Selma to 
Montgomery National Historic Trail Advisory Council will be held 
Thursday, May 17, 2007 at 9 a.m. until 3:30 p.m., at the Lowndes County 
Interpretive Center located at 7002 Highway 80 West, Hayneville, 
Alabama. The Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail Advisory 
Council was established pursuant to Public Law 100-192 establishing the 
Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail. This Council was 
established to advise the National Park Service on such issues as 
preservation of trail routes and features, public use, standards for 
posting and maintaining trail markers, and administrative matters.
    The matters to be discussed include:
    (A) Welcome New Members.
    (B) Update on the Lowndes Interpretive Center.
    (C) Update on other Interpretive Sites.
    The meeting will be open to the public. However, facilities and 
space for accommodating members of the public are limited and persons 
will be accommodated on first come, first serve basis. Anyone may file 
a written statement with Superintendent Catherine F. Light concerning 
the matters to be discussed.
    Persons wishing further information concerning this meeting may 
contact Catherine F. Light, Trail Superintendent, Selma to Montgomery 
National Historic Trail, at 334-727-6390 (phone), 334-727-4597 (fax) or 
mail 1212 Old Montgomery Road, Tuskegee Institute, Alabama 36088.

    Dated: April 3, 2007.
Shirley T. Streeter,
Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail (Acting) Superintendent.
[FR Doc. E7-7114 Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-04-P
Page 1 of 9
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 2 of 9
 

Page 3 of 9
Page 4 of 9
Page 5 of 9
Page 6 of 9
Page 7 of 9
Page 8 of 9
Page 9 of 9
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Is this tank under your town? if it is, you could have gasoline or other harmful chemicals in your drinking water

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Is this tank under your town? if it is, you could have gasoline or other harmful chemicals in your drinking water 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  176 × 51 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  21966432.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

ZACKARY W. BENNETT,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

WHITE TIGER, INC., et al., CASE NO. 2:12-CV-00171

JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK R. ABEL

Defendants.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the Order filed October 15, 2013, JUDGMENT is hereby entered

DISMISSING this case.

Date: October 15, 2013 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-00171-EAS-MRA Doc #: 27 Filed: 10/15/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Before the Second Division,

May 17, 1949

No. 53154.

#### B. Altman & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 145272-K (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of knitted wool scarves the same in all material respects as those the classification of which was involved in Abstract 50303, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.