alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 29 (Friday, February 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 7807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3143]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 29 / Friday, February 11, 2011 / 
Notices

[[Page 7807]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

[Docket No. APHIS-2009-0057]

National Wildlife Services Advisory Committee; Reestablishment

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of reestablishment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are giving notice that the Secretary of Agriculture will 
reestablish the National Wildlife Services Advisory Committee for a 2-
year period. The Secretary has determined that the Committee is 
necessary and in the public interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Joanne P. Garrett, Director, 
Operational Support Staff, WS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 87, 
Riverdale, MD 20737; (301) 734-7921.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the National Wildlife 
Services Advisory Committee (the Committee) is to advise the Secretary 
of Agriculture on policies, program issues, and research needed to 
conduct the Wildlife Services program. The Committee also serves as a 
public forum enabling those affected by the Wildlife Services program 
to have a voice in the program's policies.

    Done in Washington, DC, this 7th day of February 2011.
Pearlie S. Reed,
Assistant Secretary for Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-3143 Filed 2-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
```
(Reap. Dec. 8483)

#### Nelson Bead Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 744409, etc.

(Decided September 23, 1955)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*Geo. Stephen Leonard,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise and the issues in the Appeals to Reappraisement listed in the Schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and the issues decided in the case of *United States*v. *Nelson Bead Co.,*C. A. D. 590, and that the record in said case be incorporated and made a part of the record herein

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised values of the merchandise covered by the Appeals to Reappraisements enumerated herein, *412less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the Appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready foi' shipment to the United States, and that there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise. •

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                           2,726
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,315
<ALLOWANCES>                                       762
<INVENTORY>                                     50,971
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,534
<PP&E>                                          82,664
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,273
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 197,410
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,721
<BONDS>                                         75,626
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,878
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   197,410
<SALES>                                        131,071
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,288
<CGS>                                           90,884
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,705
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   129
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,418
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,699
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,855
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,844
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (674)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,170
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.22
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 259 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 259

    Commending the efforts of the Department of Veterans Affairs in 
                    responding to Hurricane Katrina.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 28, 2005

     Mr. Craig (for himself and Mr. Akaka) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Commending the efforts of the Department of Veterans Affairs in 
                    responding to Hurricane Katrina.

Whereas Hurricane Katrina physically devastated many areas in the States of 
        Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana;
Whereas the Department of Veterans Affairs operates 11 medical centers, 18 
        community-based outpatient clinics, 3 regional offices, and 8 national 
        cemeteries in the States of Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana;
Whereas the Department of Veterans Affairs evacuated over 1,000 patients, 
        employees, and their families from facilities in the affected areas 
        without any loss of life due to the evacuations;
Whereas over 1,000 employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs are 
        volunteering to assist veterans and their families affected by Hurricane 
        Katrina throughout the United States;
Whereas the Department of Veterans Affairs is providing shelter to over 550 
        staff and their families who have been displaced as a result of 
        Hurricane Katrina;
Whereas patients and employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs in Texas 
        provided extraordinary support and medical assistance to veterans, 
        staff, and families affected by Hurricane Katrina and coordinated 
        numerous medical efforts as part of the overall Federal Government 
        response and recovery efforts in the Gulf Region; and
Whereas heroic actions and efforts on the part of numerous employees and 
        volunteers of the Department of Veterans Affairs saved countless lives 
        and provided immeasurable comfort to the victims of Hurricane Katrina: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate commends the employees and volunteers of 
the Department of Veterans Affairs, who risked life and limb to assist 
veterans, staff, and their respective families who were affected by 
Hurricane Katrina.
                                 <all>
```
# CA2008179EN.01000301.xml

| 16.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 179/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 179/3

---

RESERVE LIST

   (1)

RESERVE LIST

(1

OPEN COMPETITION

OPEN COMPETITION

(2008/C 179 A/02)

EPSO/AD/86/07 — CONFERENCE INTERPRETERS (AD 5)

HAVING CZECH (CS) AS MAIN LANGUAGE

Option 1

| KONŠALOVÁ | Petra |
| --- | --- |
| KOVÁŘOVÁ | Pavlina |

KONŠALOVÁ

Petra

KOVÁŘOVÁ

Pavlina

Option 2

| ALFRAHOVÁ (RUSINKOVÁ) | Elena |
| --- | --- |
| ŠIMKOVÁ | Martina |
| VAJRYCHOVÁ | Lucie |

ALFRAHOVÁ (RUSINKOVÁ)

Elena

ŠIMKOVÁ

Martina

VAJRYCHOVÁ

Lucie

Option 3

| WESTERBEEK | Jan Olof |
| --- | --- |

WESTERBEEK

Jan Olof

The reserve list will be valid until 31 December 2009 and may be extended.

31 December 2009

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
# C_2008188EN.01002301.xml

| 25.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 188/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 188/23

---

Latest publication of COM documents other than legislative proposals and legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

(2008/C 188/06)

OJ C 118, 15.5.2008

OJ C 118, 15.5.2008

History of previous publications:

OJ C 106, 26.4.2008

OJ C 55, 28.2.2008

OJ C 9, 15.1.2008

OJ C 4, 9.1.2008

OJ C 246, 20.10.2007

OJ C 191, 17.8.2007

---
### combustionsurvey

- Fw: Boiler MACT Reconsideration

- CO CEMS Data

-----Forwarded by Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/ 16/2011 03:31PM -----
To: Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Stapper, Carole" <CaroleStapper@templeinland. com> Date: 07/15/2011 06:20PM Cc: "Foulke, Russ" <RussFoulke@templeinland.com> Subject: Boiler MACT Reconsideration - CO CEMS Data (See attached file: EPA Boiler MACT Reconsideration - CO CEMS Data.pdf) (See attached file: TIN Rome Mill WFB CO CEMS Data. xlsx)

Mr. Shrager:

Temple-Inland is submitting CO CEMS data for the Bo iler MACTreconsideration process as requested in the Federal Register notice publishedo n May 18, 2011. I was going to submit this directly to the docket, butit does not appear to be “open” for submittals. Since you arethe point of contact listed in the notice, I assume it is sat isfactory to sendthis directly to you. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you.

Carole J. Stapper
Environmental Manager - Air 

### Temple-Inland

Office: 512-434-1048

Fax: 512-434-8151
CaroleStapper@templeinland.com 

### From: Brian Shrager <Shrager.Brian@epamail.epa.gov> To: <combustionsurvey@erg.com> Date: 7/16/2011 3:33 PM Subject: Fw: Boiler MACT Reconsideration

- CO CEMS Data Attachments: EPA Boiler MACT Reconsideration - CO CEMS Data.pdf; TIN Rome Mill WFB CO

CEMS Data.xlsx Page 1 of 2

8/2/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpw ise\4E21AF51DO

...********** Confidentiality Notice **********

This electronic transmission and any attached docum ents or other writings are confidential and are for the sole use of the in tended recipient(s) identified above. This message may contain informat ion that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable law. If the receiver of this information is not the inte nded recipient, or the employee, or agent responsible for delivering the i nformation to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that an y use, reading, dissemination, distribution, copying or storage of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this info rmation in error, please notify the sender by return email and delete the el ectronic transmission, including all attachments from your system.



### = Page 2 of 2

8/2/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpw ise\4E21AF51DO

...
EX-10.21


   

  Exhibit 10.21

   

  AMENDMENT NO. 1

  TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

   

             This AMENDMENT   NO.   1   TO   AMENDED   AND RESTATED   EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “New Amendment”) is made as of March 18, 2021, by and between Finch Therapeutics Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“FTG”, together with all subsidiaries and affiliates hereinafter referred to as the “Company”), and Joseph Vittiglio (the “Executive”) This New Amendment shall amend that certain AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of March 12, 2021 (the “Prior Amendment”), by and between the Company and the Executive.

   

  RECITALS

   

  WHEREAS, the Prior Amendment amended that certain Employment Agreement, dated on or about December 7, 2020, by and between the Company and the Executive (the “Employment Agreement”); and

   

  WHEREAS, the vesting commencement date set forth in the Prior Amendment was mis-stated due to an administrative error; and

   

  WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Prior Amendment to reflect the true intention of the Company and the Executive, as set forth herein.

   

  NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

   

  1.AMENDMENT OF SECTION 2.3(a) OF THE PRIOR AMENDMENT. The vesting commencement date for the Option referenced in Section 2.3(a) of the Prior Agreement shall be amended such that the vesting commencement date shall be on the first year anniversary of December 7, 2020, and the remaining shares covered by the Option vesting and becoming exercisable in forty-eight (48) equal monthly installments thereafter, subject to Executive’s continuous service as of each such date.


   

  2.COUNTERPARTS. This New Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


   

  3.GOVERNING LAW. All issues and questions concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation of this New Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts without regard to conflicts of laws principles.


   

  4.NO OTHER AMENDMENT. Except as specifically amended by this New Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Prior Amendment shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their terms without modification.


   

   

  

   

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hereby executes this New Amendment as of the date first above written.

   

  FINCH THERAPEUTICS GROUP, INC.

   

   

  By:	/s/ Mark Smith 	

  Name: Mark Smith Title: CEO

   

   

  EXECUTIVE:

   

   

  									                                                /s/ Joseph Vittiglio

  Name: Joseph Vittiglio
Interagency comments on Chapter 6 of the RIA
12/16/2011 11:50 AM

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Hi Bob, I’m pulling together comments on the preamble which will come shortly, including changes to the employment language that tracks with these suggested edits, but attached are redline edits on Chapter 6. Please let me know if there are any questions.

Regards,
Cortney

Chapter 6_EmploymentImpactAnalysis_1215_I nteragencycommentsu nderEO13563.docx
Case Wo. 5,460.

#### GILPIN v. OXLEY.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 568.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

July Term, 1809.

Principal and Surety — Administration Bond— Proof of Debt.

An action will not lie against the sureties in an administration bond, until the plaintiff shall have proved his debt and a devastavit, in an action against the administrator.

Debt [by Gilpin, judge of the orphans' court] on an administration bond against the administrator of Henley and his sureties. The breach alleged is the non-payment of two promissory notes made by Henley.

Mr. Taylor, for Murgatroyd,

one of the sureties, prayed the court to instruct the jury that no suit can be supported against the sureties, until the debt has been established by a suit against the administrator, and nulla bona returned upon an execution c!e bonis testatoris. Braxton v. Winslow, 1 Wash. [Va.] 31.

E. J. Lee, contri.

The object of the bond is to secure creditors. If the administrator runs away, the plaintiff can get no judgment against him. And if his sureties are not liable, he will have no remedy. The sureties may require counter security. In Braxton v. Winslow, the suit was against the sureties only. The executor was not a party to the suit. In Turner v. Chinn's Ex’rs, 1 Hen. *&*M. 53, the court of appeals say the question is not decided; and they leave the question open, whether the return, that the executor had removed to Kentucky, was sufficient to charge the sureties. As to guardians’ bonds, there is no such decision. Call v. Ruffin, 1 Call, 333.

THE COURT

stopped Mr. Taylor in reply, considering the point as settled by the court of appeals in Virginia. Nonsuit.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 38 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 38

 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
       Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

Mr. McConnell (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. McCain, Mr. Frist, Mr. 
Reid, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Allard, Mr. Allen, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Biden, Mr. 
Bingaman, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Bunning, Mr. Burns, Mr. Burr, 
Mr. Chafee, Mr. Chambliss, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Cochran, Ms. Collins, Mr. 
DeWine, Mrs. Dole, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Ensign, Mr. Feingold, 
 Mr. Hagel, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Kohl, Mr. Kyl, Mr. 
   Leahy, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Lugar, Mr. Martinez, Mr. Menendez, Ms. 
  Mikulski, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Obama, Mr. Salazar, Mr. Santorum, Mr. 
 Sarbanes, Mr. Smith, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Sununu, Mr. Voinovich, and Mr. 
Wyden) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
       Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003, and for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO BURMESE FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY ACT OF 2003.

    Section 9(b)(3) of the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003 
(Public Law 108-61; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended by striking ``three 
years'' and inserting ``six years''.

SEC. 2. RENEWAL OF IMPORT RESTRICTIONS UNDER BURMESE FREEDOM AND 
              DEMOCRACY ACT OF 2003.

    (a) In General.--Congress approves the renewal of import 
restrictions contained in section 3(a)(1) of the Burmese Freedom and 
Democracy Act of 2003.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--This joint resolution shall be deemed to 
be a ``renewal resolution'' for purposes of section 9 of the Burmese 
Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on 
the date of the enactment of this Act or July 26, 2006, whichever 
occurs first.
                                 <all>
```
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 181 

Recognizing July 1, 2005, as the 100th Anniversary of the Forest Service. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 23, 2005 

Mr. SMITH (for himself, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. BURNS, 

and Mr. FEINGOLD) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION

Recognizing July 1, 2005, as the 100th Anniversary of the 

Forest Service.

Whereas Congress established the Forest Service in 1905 to 

provide quality water and timber for the benefit of the 

United States; 

Whereas the mission of the Forest Service has expanded to 

include management of national forests for multiple uses 

and benefits, including the sustained yield of renewable 

resources such as water, forage, wildlife, wood, and recreation; 

Whereas the National Forest System encompasses 

192,000,000 acres in 44 States, Puerto Rico, and the 

Virgin Islands, including 155 national forests and 20 national grasslands; 
2

•SRES 181 ATS

Whereas the Forest Service significantly contributes to the 

scientific and technical knowledge necessary to protect 

and sustain natural resources on all land in the United 

States; 

Whereas the Forest Service cooperates with State, Tribal, 

and local governments, forest industries, other private 

landowners, and forest users in the management, protection, and development of forest land the Federal Government does not own; 

Whereas the Forest Service participates in work, training, 

and education programs such as AmeriCorps, Job Corps, 

and the Senior Community Service Employment Program; 

Whereas the Forest Service plays a key role internationally 

in developing sustainable forest management and biodiversity conservation for the protection and sound management of the forest resources of the world; 

Whereas, from rangers to researchers and from foresters to 

fire crews, the Forest Service has maintained a dedicated 

professional workforce that began in 1905 with 500 employees and in 2005 includes more than 30,000; and 

Whereas Gifford Pinchot, the first Chief of the Forest Service, fostered the idea of managing for the greatest good 

of the greatest number: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes July 1, 2005, as the 100th Anni3 versary of the Forest Service; 

4 (2) commends the Forest Service of the Depart5 ment of Agriculture for 100 years of dedicated serv6 ice managing the forests of the United States; 
3

•SRES 181 ATS

1 (3) acknowledges the promise of the Forest 

2 Service to continue to preserve the natural legacy of 

3 the United States for an additional 100 years and 

4 beyond; and 

5 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

6 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

7 activities.

Æ