alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006131EN.01005301.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/53

---

Action brought on 10 April 2006 — Strack v Commission

(Case F-37/06)

(2006/C 131/96)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Guido Strack (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: G. Bouneaou and F. Frabetti, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the defendant's implied decision of 7 July 2005 rejecting the applicant's request that his illness should be acknowledged to be an occupational illness; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the defendant's implied decision of 7 July 2005 rejecting the applicant's request that his illness should be acknowledged to be an occupational illness;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the applicant EUR 2 000 by way of damages and interest to compensate for the material loss suffered in consequence of the decision of 7 July 2005 to reject the request; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the applicant EUR 2 000 by way of damages and interest to compensate for the material loss suffered in consequence of the decision of 7 July 2005 to reject the request;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the applicant EUR 5 000 by way of damages and interest to compensate for the non-material loss suffered in consequence of the decision of 7 July 2005 to reject the request; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the applicant EUR 5 000 by way of damages and interest to compensate for the non-material loss suffered in consequence of the decision of 7 July 2005 to reject the request;

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the claim for annulment, the applicant puts forward three pleas alleging, by the first plea, infringement of Article 90 of the Staff Regulations, by the second plea, infringement of the principle of the prohibition on arbitrary procedure, of the obligation to give reasons and abuse of powers and, by the third plea, infringement of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.

In support of the claim for damages, the applicant submits that the implied decision rejecting his request left him in a state of uncertainty and anxiety which persisted for a number of months, giving rise to consequent material and non-material loss.

---
Exhibit 4.2





ADDENDUM No. 2


to


the Management Agreement dated 31/05/2011 and any addenda thereto


(the "Management Agreement")





Between


ALAQUA MARINE LIMITED


of Liberia


(as Owner)





And





ALLSEAS MARINE S.A.


of Liberia


(as Manager)





In respect of the management of the Vessel CMA CGM MARLIN (the "Vessel")





Notwithstanding the relevant provisions of the Management Agreement, it is this, 18th day of September 2012, mutually agreed between the Owner and the Manager that a clause 8.05 shall be added to read as follows:





"Unless the agreement is terminated by the Owner in accordance with Clauses 12.03 (iii) and (iv) of this Agreement or by reason of default by gross negligence or misconduct of Manager, its Directors, officers and/or employees in the performance under this Agreement, upon termination of this Agreement in relation to the Vessel, the Management Fee will be continued at the above rate then in effect for 90 days from the date of termination. This is to cover operating and accounting cost of finalizing the Vessels' disbursements, demurrage, etc. In addition, the Owner shall continue to pay the following:





i)
Crew support costs for a further period of three calendar months


ii)
An equitable proportion of any management staff redundancy costs which may materialize.





Notwithstanding the above, in the event that the Management Agreement is terminated in accordance with Clause 12.05, then the provisions of the Compensation Agreement between the Manager and Box Ships Inc. dated 12/09/2012, copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, forming an integral part of this Agreement, or any renewal thereof shall be applied."





All other fees, terms, conditions and provisions of the Management Agreement remain unaltered and in Full force and effect.








IN WITNESS WHEREOFthe parties have signed this Addendum this 18th day of September, 2012.


FOR THE OWNER
FOR THE MANAGER/s/ Maria Stefanou
/s/  George SkrimizeasMARIA STEFANOU
GEORGE SKRIMIZEASAttorney-in-fact
Attorney-in-fact
#### Sears Roebuck & Co. *v.*United States

No. 7387.

Invoice dated Redditch, England, June 1945.

Certified June 1945.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 10, 1945.

Entry No. 700725.

(Decided September 26, 1947)

*J ames W. Bevans*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the above-mentioned merchandise are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

*255Upon the agreed facts I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the values of said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# CA2009016EN.01000401.xml

| 22.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 16/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 16/4

---

RESERVE LISTS

   (1)

OPEN COMPETITIONS

(2009/C 16 A/03)

EPSO/AD/90/07 — CONFERENCE INTERPRETERS (AD 5) HAVING SLOVAK (SK) AS MAIN LANGUAGE

Option 1

| KRAJČÍROVÁ | Kristina |
| --- | --- |
| NERÁD | Juraj |
| PLULÍKOVÁ | Jana |
| REGNEROVÁ | Zuzana |

KRAJČÍROVÁ

Kristina

NERÁD

Juraj

PLULÍKOVÁ

Jana

REGNEROVÁ

Zuzana

Option 2

| PSICOVÁ | Katarina |
| --- | --- |

PSICOVÁ

Katarina

Option 3

| SOROLLA SERRANO | Maria Teresa |
| --- | --- |

SOROLLA SERRANO

Maria Teresa

EPSO/AD91/07 — CONFERENCE INTERPRETERS (AD 7) HAVING SLOVAK (SK) AS MAIN LANGUAGE

Option 1

| CABADAJOVÁ | Ivana |
| --- | --- |
| MATUŠKOVÁ | Katarina |
| PETROVSKÁ | Miroslava |
| RUSIŇÁKOVÁ | Eva |

CABADAJOVÁ

Ivana

MATUŠKOVÁ

Katarina

PETROVSKÁ

Miroslava

RUSIŇÁKOVÁ

Eva

Option 2

| MAKAROVÁ | Viera |
| --- | --- |
| TOMÁŠEKOVÁ | Zdenka |

MAKAROVÁ

Viera

TOMÁŠEKOVÁ

Zdenka

Option 3

NO SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE

The reserve lists will be valid until
  31 December 2010
  and may be extended.

31 December 2010

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
Amendment to Letter Agreement--Henry R. Wolfe


 Exhibit 10.3 
 CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEDGED 
 August 11, 2008 
 Henry R. Wolfe, Ph.D. 
 c/o Genaera Corporation 
 5110 Campus Drive 
 Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 
 Dear Hank: 
 As discussed with you, Genaera proposes to amend your letter of employment dated March 23, 2005, as amended
by letter agreement dated May 8, 2008. The following paragraph is hereby added as the new last paragraph: 
 “Additionally, if
Genaera terminates your employment without cause (as defined in Genaera’s 2004 Stock Based Incentive Compensation Plan): (a) all of your outstanding unvested options to purchase, or awards to acquire, securities of Genaera Corporation
shall vest as of the date of termination; and (b) all of your outstanding options to purchase, or awards to acquire, securities of Genaera Corporation shall remain exercisable for the shorter of twelve (12) months following the date of
termination or the original term of such option to purchase, or award to acquire, securities of Genaera Corporation.” 
 Except as amended above, all
other terms and conditions of your employment shall remain in full force and effect. 
 Please indicate your acceptance of this amendment by your signature
below and return to Human Resources by August 15, 2008. 
  

	
	 /s/ John L. Armstrong, Jr.

	John L. Armstrong, Jr.
	President and Chief Executive Officer


			
		
	Accepted:	 	 /s/ Henry R. Wolfe

		
	Date:	 	August 13, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 70 (Thursday, April 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18486-18487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6905]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection

[CBP Dec. 07-23]


Re-Accreditation and Re-Approval of Intertek Caleb Brett, Inc., 
as a Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of re-approval of Intertek Caleb Brett, Inc., of 
Benicia, California, as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 
151.13, Intertek Caleb Brett, Inc., 6050 Egret Court, Benicia, 
California 94510, has been re-approved to gauge petroleum and petroleum 
products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils, and to test petroleum 
and petroleum products for customs purposes, in accordance with the 
provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this 
entity to conduct laboratory analysis or gauger services should request 
and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or 
approved by the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection to conduct the 
specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries 
regarding the specific tests or gauger services this entity is 
accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the Bureau of 
Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry 
may also be sent to http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/org_and_operations.xml.

DATES: The re-approval of Intertek Caleb Brett as a commercial gauger 
and laboratory became effective on September 21, 2005. The next 
triennial inspection date will be scheduled for September 2008.

[[Page 18487]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eugene J. Bondoc, PhD, or Randall 
Breaux, Laboratories and Scientific Services, Bureau of Customs and 
Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, 
Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

    Dated: April 6, 2007.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
 [FR Doc. E7-6905 Filed 4-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7312]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Guidelines for Submission of CDs, DVDs, and Other 
Electronic Media

April 12, 2007.
    Take notice that the Commission is issuing notice of guidelines for 
submission of CDs, DVDs and other electronic media. An increasing 
number of traditionally paper documents submitted to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (FERC) are now accompanied by one or more CDs, 
DVDs or other electronic media that contain all or part of the 
submission, or contain supplements to the submission. These guidelines 
address such submissions and require that, among other things, the CDs/
DVDs contain the entire submission.
    These guidelines apply to documents that cannot be submitted 
through any of the Commission's existing electronic gateways: The 
eFiling system, the eForms system, or the Electric Quarterly Reports 
(EQR) system. They thus are primarily intended for larger filings and 
those filings that contain Privileged, Critical Energy Infrastructure 
(CEII), or Non-Internet Public (NIP) information.
    Persons following these guidelines will be granted an automatic 
waiver of the number of paper copies and may instead submit the 
requisite number of copies of a filing on CD/DVD and reduce the number 
of paper copies to an original and two copies in most cases. These 
guidelines do not change any FERC requirements concerning service of 
submissions on customers, parties, or other persons.
    The guidelines will be posted at: http://www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide.asp and updated when necessary to reflect revised 
procedures or changes in media.

Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-7312 Filed 4-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:12-CR-059

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

MICHAEL E. HANNA, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On April 9, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to Count One of

the Information charging him with enticing or attempting to entice a minor to engage in unlawful

sexual activities, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) (Doc. 19). Defendant, represented by counsel,

waived his right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted

the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s plea was

knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis in fact. Further, the Magistrate Judge

observed that at the time Defendant entered his guilty plea, he was in full possession of his faculties,

was not suffering from any apparent physical or mental illness, and was not under the influence of

narcotics or alcohol. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

Case: 2:12-cr-00059-GCS Doc #: 23 Filed: 05/01/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
not file any objections. 

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count One of the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of

enticing or attempting to entice a minor to engage in unlawful sexual activities. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:12-cr-00059-GCS Doc #: 23 Filed: 05/01/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/gpo45166/mgg8.gif[2/20/2014 11:04:18 AM]
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/image/mgg8.gif[1/14/2014 3:29:50 PM]
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

RONALD D. LEONARD,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

GARY MOHR, et al., CASE NO. C2-11-152

JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

Defendants. MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK R. ABEL

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or

trial.

Pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed March 20, 2012, JUDGMENT is hereby

entered for the Defendants. This case is DISMISSED.

Date: March 20, 2012 JAMES BONINI, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:11-cv-00152-EAS-MRA Doc #: 51 Filed: 03/20/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
```

[104th Congress Public Law 245]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ245.104]

[[Page 110 STAT. 3145]]

Public Law 104-245
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To reinstate the permit for, and extend the deadline under the Federal 
Power Act applicable to the construction of, a hydroelectric project in 
 Oregon, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Oct. 9, 1996 -  [H.R. 1290]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT OF PERMIT EXTENSION DEADLINE.

    Notwithstanding the expiration of the permit and notwithstanding the 
time period specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 
806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission Project No. 7829, the Commission shall, at the request of the 
licensee for the project, <<NOTE: Effective date.>>  reinstate the 
permit effective May 23, 1993, and extend the time period during which 
the licensee is required to commence the construction of the project so 
as to terminate on May 25, 1999.

    Approved October 9, 1996.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1290 (S. 538):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104-320 (Comm. on Commerce).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 104-75 accompanying S. 538 (Comm. on Energy and 
Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 141 (1995):
                                    Nov. 13, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 142 (1996):
                                    Sept. 27, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Boise Paper 

400 Second Street, International Falls, MN 56649 

T 218.285.5664 F 208.331 .5n3 

November 28, 2011 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

• 

On behalf of Boise Inc. and the 850 employees at our International Falls paper mill, I am writing in 

strong support of the federal Essential Air Service (EAS} program that maintains service to our 

community. 

With the recent announcement by Delta Airlines to terminate service to the International Falls 

airport, the case for protecting EAS is significantly reinforced. Air service is the only means of 

public transportation to and from our community and is essential to the growth and development of 

our business. 

Air service is particularly important as we serve our customer needs. Technical service 

representatives must be able to respond in a timely manner to customer concerns. Driving to 

another community would add an additional day to our response time, put us at a competitive 

disadvantage, and could potentially cause the loss of customers that are so critical to our economic 

vitality. 

Also imperative is supplier response time. When experiencing operational difficulties, time is of the 

essence. If suppliers experience additional travel time, it would cause additional hours of lost 

productivity and could be the difference in meeting important customer delivery requirements. 

In addition, we use air service as a selling point when recruiting employees. It is difficult to attract 

those without ties to our remote location and would be even more so without this critical 

transportation service. 

We will whole-heartedly support the airline that replaces Delta and ask that you continue to 

consider the small communities in Minnesota that economically cannot afford to be without air 

service. 

Bert Brown 

Mill Manager 
Page 2 

November 28, 2011 

xc: Falls Airport Commission 

International Falls City Council 

Koochiching County Board of Commissioners 

Pete Makowski, Office of Senator AI Franken 

Jerry Fallos, Office of Senator Amy Klobuchar 

Alisa Rossini, Office of Representative Chip Cravaack 

Essential Air Service - Dayton
SANDEE BRYAN MARtON CHIEF JUSTICE KAREN ANGELINI MARIALYN BARNARD REBECA C. MARTINEZ PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA JASON PULLIAM

JUSTICES 

### COURT OF APPEALS FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE CENTER 300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 3200 SAN ANTONIO. TEXAS 78205-3037 WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4THCOA.ASPX

July 12,2016 

### Leigh Cutter Jean Brown Family Law 222 Main Plaza San Antonio, TX 78205 

### Margaret D. Roberts 15331 Clear Grove San Antonio, TX 78247
RE: Court ofAppeals Number: 04-16-00170-CV Trial Court Case Number: 2009-CI-09297 

### Style: In the Interest ofA.B.R. and P.Y.R., Children KEITH E. HOTTLE CLERK OF COURT

TELEPHONE (210)335-2635 FACSIMILE NO.

(210)335-2762



### Enclosed please find the order which the Honorable Court ofAppeals has issuedin reference to the above styled and numbered cause. 

### If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

cc: Jean S. Brown 

### Very truly yours, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Jacqueline 

### Legal Assistant, Fourth CourtofAppeals 210-335-3854

# w, Jfourti) Court of^pealsi ^an Slntonio, tlTexafi July 12, 2016
No. 04-16-00170-CV IN THE INTEREST OF A.B.R. AND P.Y.R., Children, 

### From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-CI-09297 

### Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding
ORDER 

### The Appellee's Motion to ExtendMediation Stay ofthis appeal to September2,2016 is DENIED, Itis FURTHER ORDERED that all appellate deadlines will remain suspended until August 4,2016; in accordance to the orderissued by this court on June 20, 2016.



# #o/ 50/

INWITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set myhand andaffixed the seal of the said court on this 12th day ofJuly, 2016. Marifilyn Bamgrd, Justice

Keitn E. Hottle Clerk ofCourt
No. 41906.

#### Protests 941837-G, etc., of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) siren whistles and horns at 45 percent under paragraph 397, Abstracts 39948 and 40480 followed; (2) tin kazoos similar to those the subject of Abstract 32264 at 45 percent under paragraph 397; (3) paper bells like those the subject of *Kresge*v. *United States*(25 C. C. P. A. 1, T. D. 48975) at 45 percent under paragraph 397; and (4) opera glasses similar to those passed upon in *Woolworth*v. *United States*(C. D. 74) at 35 percent under paragraph 228 (b) and the French Trade Agreement.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

ALCA, Inc. et al 

Complainants 

Miami-Dade County, Florida 

Respondent 

FAA Docket 16-08-05 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

Pursuant to 14 CFR § 16.11(a), the Director does hereby extend the date that the Director's 

initial determination will be rendered in the above-referenced case to February 9, 2009. An 

extension is necessary because the Agency requires additional time to review information it 

believes is essential for a fair and complete hearing of the matter. 

NOV 2 3 2009 

Randall S. Fiertz Date 

Director of Office of Airport Compliance 

and Field Operations 

CD 

. C O 

"J ~o 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on November ^^ , 2009,1 caused to be placed in the 

United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) or personally delivered, a true copy of 

the foregoing document addressed to: 

Michael A. Pizzi, Jr., P.A. 

15271 NWeO*^ Avenue 

Suite 206A 

Miami Lakes, FL 33014 

Counsel for Complainants 

David M. Murray 

Thomas P. Abbott 

Assistant County Attorneys 

Aviation Division 

P.O. Box 025504 

Miami, FL 33102-5504 

Counsel for Respondent 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Office of Airports, Compliance and Field Operations, ACO-lOO 

le Torgerson U 

Office of Airport Compliance and 

Field Operations