alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 4 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 25
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 4

 Providing for congressional disapproval of the rule submitted by the 
  Department of Agriculture under chapter 8 of title 5, United States 
  Code, relating to risk zones for introduction of bovine spongiform 
                            encephalopathy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2005

   Mr. Conrad (for himself, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Salazar, Mr. 
Johnson, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Reid, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Durbin, 
 Mr. Burns, and Mr. Wyden) introduced the following joint resolution; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

                             March 2, 2005

   Discharged pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c) and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for congressional disapproval of the rule submitted by the 
  Department of Agriculture under chapter 8 of title 5, United States 
  Code, relating to risk zones for introduction of bovine spongiform 
                            encephalopathy.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Agriculture relating to the 
establishment of minimal risk zones for introduction of bovine 
spongiform encephalopathy (published at 70 Fed. Reg. 460 (2005)), and 
such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                                        Calendar No. 25

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              S. J. Res. 4

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 Providing for congressional disapproval of the rule submitted by the 
  Department of Agriculture under chapter 8 of title 5, United States 
  Code, relating to risk zones for introduction of bovine spongiform 
                            encephalopathy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 2, 2005

   Discharged pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c) and placed on the calendar
```
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of InterXion Holding N.V. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies to the undersigneds knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ David C. Ruberg

David C. Ruberg

Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 8, 2014
U.S. Department 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

of Transportation Washington, DC 20590

Federal Railroad

Administration

NOTICE

FRA Administrator’s Declaration of Emergency Situation:

Novel Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19)

Pursuant to Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 211.45, Federal Railroad 

Administration Administrator Ronald L. Batory has determined that the imminent threat and

exposure to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) poses a risk of serious illness that 

constitutes an “emergency situation” as related to railroad operations.

In making this determination, the Administrator notes the President has declared a national 

emergency related to COVID-19 and the World Health Organization (WHO) has made the 

assessment of COVID-19 and it is now characterized as pandemic, which can cause serious 

illness to high risk populations. Governors of several States have issued various Emergency 

Declarations related to COVID-19 outbreaks. The Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention (CDC) has reported more than 1,600 cases across forty-six (46) States and the 

number of cases of this respiratory illness is expected to increase. 

Therefore, the Administrator has activated the Emergency Relief Docket (FRA-2020-0002) 

for Novel Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) as of March 13, 2020, and the emergency relief

provisions of 49 CFR § 211.45 are in effect.
RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS ON POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL (PTC) | PAGE 1

Research Publications on Positive Train Control (PTC)

January 2015–July 2018

Click on the title to access the publication via FRA's website.

Title of Report Report Type eLibrary

Publication Date

Positive Train Control Interoperability Test Support: 

Radio Frequency Desense Testing Research Results July 13, 2018

Research on Methods for Enhancing Positive Train 

Control Freight Braking Algorithms Technical Report July 12, 2018

Positive Train Location: Final Report Technical Report June 11, 2018

Positive Train Control Track Data Auditing System Technical Report May 31, 2018

PTC Test Bed Siding Signal Upgrade at the 

Transportation Technology Center Technical Report May 30, 2018

PTC Test Bed Upgrades to Back Office and ComputerAided Dispatch Systems Technical Report May 7, 2018

Positive Train Control Test Bed Verification Technical Report May 2, 2018

PTC Test Facility Assessment and Laboratory 

Development: Phase I

Technical Report April 12, 2018

Next Generation Track Circuits Technical Report April 10, 2018

Northeast Corridor PTC Radio Frequency 

Network Design Technical Report April 4, 2018

PTC Radio Frequency Network Design for Dense 

Urban Areas Technical Report April 3, 2018

PTC Radio Desense Mitigation Research Phase 2: 

Filter Identification and Testing1

Technical Report March 15, 2018

Appendix A. Requirements for Positive Train Control 

220 MHz Locomotive Radio Filter

1 Published separately; to 

accompany Technical 

Report published on 

March 15, 2018

March 15, 2018

Appendix B. 220 MHz PTC Locomotive Filter Test Plan 

and Procedures

1 Published separately; to 

accompany Technical 

Report published on

March 15, 2018

March 15, 2018

Signaling System and Advanced Civil Speed 

Enforcement System Upgrade to Transit Test Track at 

the Transportation Technology Center

Technical Report September 19, 2017
RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS ON POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL (PTC) | PAGE 2

Title of Report Report Type eLibrary

Publication Date

Providing Wireless Bandwidth for High-speed 

Rail Operations Technical Report July 26, 2016

Positive Train Control Desense Mitigation Test: 

Research Phase 1 Technical Report May 31, 2016

Employee-In-Charge Portable Remote Terminal Phases 

3 and 4 Summary Report Technical Report May 6, 2016

Status of the Transportation Technology Center - 2015 Technical Report March 21, 2016

Positive Train Control Interoperability and 

Networking Research Technical Report December 4, 2015

PTC Test Bed Upgrades to Provide ACSES 

Testing Support Capabilities at Transportation 

Technology Center

Technical Report June 12, 2015

Positive Train Control Shared Network Research Results May 8, 2015

Identity Management for Interoperable PTC Systems 

in Bandwidth-Limited Environments (Part 1) Technical Report January 8, 2015

Note: “PTC” may not appear in all report titles listed above; in such instances, PTC was an implicated element of the study.
# C_2008208EN.01000301.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 208/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 208/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 August 2008

(2008/C 208/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4907 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 163,36 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4591 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,7953 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3838 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6219 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 120,63 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,006 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,351 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 237,28 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7035 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,309 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5265 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,325 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,766 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,701 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5775 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,6426 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1197 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0984 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 549,88 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,6461 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2262 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,1874 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 685,37 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9655 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,86 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,2275 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,274 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3983 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,1261 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4907

JPY

Japanese yen

163,36

DKK

Danish krone

7,4591

GBP

Pound sterling

0,7953

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3838

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6219

ISK

Iceland króna

120,63

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,006

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,351

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

237,28

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7035

PLN

Polish zloty

3,309

RON

Romanian leu

3,5265

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,325

TRY

Turkish lira

1,766

AUD

Australian dollar

1,701

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5775

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,6426

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1197

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0984

KRW

South Korean won

1 549,88

ZAR

South African rand

11,6461

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2262

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,1874

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 685,37

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9655

PHP

Philippine peso

66,86

RUB

Russian rouble

36,2275

THB

Thai baht

50,274

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3983

MXN

Mexican peso

15,1261

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

MARVIN E. MYERS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Civil Action 2:12-CV-255 

Judge Graham

Magistrate Judge King

D. BLACKWELL,

Defendant.

ORDER

On August 16, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended

that plaintiff’s motion for entry of defendants’ default be denied. 

Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 28. This matter is now before the

Court on plaintiff’s objection to that recommendation. Objection, Doc.

No. 24, 2012.

In recommending that plaintiff’s motion be denied, the Magistrate

Judge observed, inter alia, that certain defendants had forty-five (45)

days after service of process to respond to the Amended Complaint;

because that time had not yet elapsed, those defendants were not in

default. Plaintiff objects to that aspect of the Report and

Recommendation, arguing that all defendants are required to respond

within twenty-one (21) days after service of process. 

Rule 12(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides

that an answer must be filed “within 21 days after being served with the

summons and complaint[.]” However, a court has authority to extend that

time, for good cause, “with or without motion or notice if the court

acts, or if a request is made, before the original time or its extension

expires[.]” Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A). In authorizing service of

Case: 2:12-cv-00255-JLG-NMK Doc #: 35 Filed: 08/31/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
process by the Marshals Service in this case, the Magistrate Judge

extended the time for responding to forty-five (45) days. Initial Screen

of the Complaint, Doc. No. 4. Because all defendants are employees of the

Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, who are frequently

named as defendants in civil litigation initiated by inmates, there is

good cause for providing this standard extension. Thus, defendants were

not in default for response to the Amended Complaint at the time that

plaintiff moved for entry of default.

Plaintiff’s Objection, Doc. No. 30, is DENIED. The August 16, 2012

Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 28, is ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED. 

Date: August 31, 2012 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

2

Case: 2:12-cv-00255-JLG-NMK Doc #: 35 Filed: 08/31/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
USCIS Initiative to Combat the Unauthorized Practice of Immigration

Law</br> Fact Sheet

Introduction

The unauthorized practice of immigration law (UPIL) endangers the integrity of our immigration system and victimizes members of the

immigrant community. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) plans to launch an initiative to combat this exploitative

practice by:

Promoting public understanding of the best ways to find bona fide legal advice and avoid scams

Building capacity for legitimate assistance and services

Supporting enforcement action against those who engage in the unauthorized practice of immigration law

Unauthorized Practice of Immigration Law

The unauthorized practice of immigration law occurs when those who are not attorneys or accredited representatives:

Provide legal assistance to applicants or petitioners in immigration matters

Charge more than a nominal fee

Hold themselves out to be qualified in legal matters

Locally Focused Engagement Plan

Since January 2010, USCIS has been working with internal and external stakeholders to understand the community’s concerns about UPIL. After hosting an initial dialogue with the public earlier this year, the agency convened an internal working group to analyze best practices and design a comprehensive public-engagement strategy.

USCIS will begin the initiative with a focus on seven pilot cities: Atlanta, Baltimore, Detroit, Fresno, Los Angeles, New York and San

Antonio. These cities were selected based on the following criteria:

Geographic diversity

Diversity of immigrant communities

Well-established and recent immigration gateways

Identified need for additional Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) recognized organizations and accredited representatives

Mix of cities with varying degrees of existing UPIL efforts and resources

Earlier this year, USCIS hosted engagement sessions in seven pilot cities to collect input on specific local concerns. USCIS plans to

expand this initiative nationwide in 2011.

Last Reviewed/Updated: 03/10/2011

USCIS Initiative to Combat the Unauthorized Practice of Immigrati... http://www.uscis.gov/news/fact-sheets/uscis-initiative-combat-una...

1 of 1 03/12/15 8:10 AM
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 179 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 179

   To provide for oversight over the Capitol Visitors Center by the 
                       Architect of the Capitol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2005

Mr. Lott (for himself, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Frist, Mr. Reid, Mr. Stevens, Mr. 
     Durbin, Mr. Cochran, and Mr. Allard) submitted the following 
     resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To provide for oversight over the Capitol Visitors Center by the 
                       Architect of the Capitol.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. CAPITOL VISITOR CENTER.

    (a) In General.--The Architect of the Capitol shall have the 
responsibility for the facilities management and operations of the 
Capitol Visitor Center.
    (b) Executive Director.--The Architect of the Capitol may appoint 
an Executive Director of the Capitol Visitor Center whose annual rate 
of pay shall be determined by the Architect of the Capitol and shall 
not exceed $1,500 less than the annual rate of pay for the Architect of 
the Capitol.
    (c) Congressional Oversight.--The responsibilities of the Architect 
of the Capitol under this section shall be subject to congressional 
oversight by the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate 
and as determined separately by the House of Representatives.
    (d) Capitol Preservation Commission Jurisdiction.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to remove the jurisdiction of the Capitol 
Preservation Commission.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

CERTIFICATION

I, Dale H. Sizemore, Jr.,certify that:

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Torotel, Inc.

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:

a)        designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

b)        evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “EvaluationDate”); and

c)        presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

a)        all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)        any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.     The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there weresignificant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.
| /s/ Dale H. Sizemore, Jr. |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                      |
|                      |
| Dale H. Sizemore, Jr.     |
| Chief Executive Officer   |
| March 15, 2007            |

 

----
# C_2008175EN.01000202.xml

| 10.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5167 — EMC/Iomega)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 175/04)

On 2 June 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5167. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5167. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
# C_2008067EN.01005001.xml

| 12.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 67/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 67/50

---

Framework Programme ‘Security and Safeguarding Liberties’

Specific Programme ‘Prevention of and Fight against Crime’

Operating grants

(2008/C 67/08)

A call for proposals is published on the Europa website at:

http://www.ec.europa.eu/justice_home/funding/isec/funding_isec_en.htm

Deadline for presentation of proposals: 15 April 2008.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
unaudited financial statements contained in the Company's Form 10-QSB and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                               15440359
<SECURITIES>                         1785262 
<RECEIVABLES>                        110515
<ALLOWANCES>                         0
<INVENTORY>                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     17336136
<PP&E>                               856276
<DEPRECIATION>                       0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       23453716
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                673236
<BONDS>                              0
<COMMON>                             524157
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0 
<OTHER-SE>                           20149466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         23453716
<SALES>                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     897532
<CGS>                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        472730 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      421587
<INCOME-TAX>                         155000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  266587
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0 
<CHANGES>                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                         266587
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0
        

</TABLE>