alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of SodaStream International Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Erdreich,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





April 16, 2013



|By: | /s/ Daniel Erdreich            | 
|--- | ------------------------------ | 
|    | Name: Daniel Erdreich          | 
|    | Title: Chief Financial Officer |
Order entered July 8, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00799-CV

IN RE KAJIN SHAMDEEN, Relator

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 3

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 003-02757-2019

ORDER

On February 2, 2021, this Court issued an order explaining that this matter 

will remain abated until June 30, 2021, unless any party shows by prompt motion 

that the receivership court has extended the stay. Because the parties have not 

advised us that the receivership has extended the stay, we LIFT the abatement and 

REINSTATE this original proceeding.

The response, if any, to the petition for writ of mandamus shall be filed 

WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS.

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK

JUSTICE
SEC Reference 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of eMedia Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Henrik Schaumann Jorgensen, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:






(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and






(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Henrik Schaumann JorgensenHenrik Schaumann JorgensenPrincipal Executive Officer

Principal Financial OfficerDate: May 12, 2016
Exhibit-32.1 -- Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)

 

I am the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officerof JA Energy, a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Kof the Company for the year ended August 31, 2011 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange

Commission ("Form 10-K").

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the amended Form 10-K fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information containedin the amended Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

Dated: December 14, 2011

By: /s/ James Lusk	

James Lusk

Its: Principal Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Yosemite

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Yosemite 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  Berann, Heinrich C. 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  National Park Service/ U.S. Department of the Interior 
                    -           Description        
                    -  artwork by Heinrich Berann 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  Yosemite National Park (Calif.) 
                    -           Country        
                    -  United States 
                    -           State        
                    -  California 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  174 × 99 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  020496848.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Exhibit 34.14



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



| |  |  |  |                                                                                                                               
| |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | Audit . Tax . Advisory
Grant Thornton LLP 1201 Walnut St, Suite 2200
Kansas City, Missouri 64106 T 816.412.2400
F 816.412.2404

Board of Directors

Situs
Holdings, LLC

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing
Criteria (Managements Assertion), that Situs Holdings, LLC (the Company) complied with servicing criteria set forth in Items 1117, 1119, 1122(d)(3)(i)(A-B) and 1122(d)(4)(vii) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commissions Regulation AB for the Operating or Trust Advisor Services Platform (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016. The platform consists of asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management in
Appendix B of Managements report. Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion about the Companys
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction or
security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Companys servicing activities
during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that Situs Holdings, LLC complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2016, for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Kansas City, Missouri

February 28, 2017
Exhibit 99.2



            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350
                        as adopted pursuant to
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                      Chief Financial Officer

The undersigned, as the chief financial officer of Todd Shipyards
Corporation (the "Company") does hereby certify for purposes of
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that (i) the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-K for the Company's fiscal quarter ending September 29,
2002 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on October 29, 2002, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and (ii) information contained in the periodic report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the periods covered in the Report.



By:
    Scott H. Wiscomb
    Chief Financial Officer



October 29, 2002
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersignedcertifies that (1) this Quarterly Report of Todhunter International, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company andits results of operations as of and for the periods covered therein.

 
|   | /s/  Jay S. Maltby                          |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|   | Jay S. Maltby                                    |
|   | Chairman, Chief  Executive Officer and President |

 

 

Date:  August 14, 2003

 

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versionof this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
# C_2007315EN.01003701.xml

| 22.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/37

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 7 November 2007 — Marly v OHIM — Erdal (Top iX)

(Case T-57/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for figurative Community trade mark Top iX - Earlier international word mark TOFIX - Relative ground for refusal - Absence of likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Request for proof of genuine use of the earlier mark submitted for the first time before the Court - Inadmissibility)

(2007/C 315/69)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: NV Marly SA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Mouffe and O. Rodesch, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Petrequin and A. Rassat, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Erdal GmbH (Hallein, Austria) (represented by: M. Thewes and V. Wiot, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 December 2005 (Case R 1147/2004-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Erdal GmbH and NV Marly SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders NV Marly SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders NV Marly SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 96, 22.4.2006.

1

---
# C_2008288EN.01000102.xml

| 11.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5327 — Ashland/Hercules)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 288/02)

On 6 October 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5327. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5327. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

DELLA M. DRAISE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:12-cv-542

JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST

Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel

ORDER

 This matter is before the Court for consideration of attorney Adrienne Pietropaolo’s

unopposed December 3, 2014 motion for an award of attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). 

(ECF No. 24.) Counsel seeks an award of $10,000.00 in attorney fees. 

Under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), the Court can award reasonable attorney fees for work

performed before it, not to exceed 25 percent of the past-due benefits owed to the claimant. See

42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A) (“Whenever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant under

this subchapter who was represented before the court by an attorney, the court may determine

and allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess of 25

percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by reason of such

judgment . . . .”). The Supreme Court has stated that the method for determining the

appropriateness of an attorney fee begins by focusing on the contingent fee agreement between

counsel and her client. Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 808 (2002). Counsel has the

burden of showing that the fee request is reasonable, and the court serves “as an independent

1

Case: 2:12-cv-00542-GLF-MRA Doc #: 25 Filed: 02/04/15 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
check” to assure that the agreement yields a reasonable result in a particular case. Id. at 807.

Here, the fee agreement is reasonable. The fee sought is approximately 15.9% of the

past-due benefits, less than the 25% agreed to by Plaintiff. Additionally, Plaintiff’s counsel has

not sought and will not seek an award of attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(a) for services

performed at the administrative level. The fee award will be offset by $2,550 previously

awarded by the Court under the EAJA (which counsel incorrectly states as $2,500 in the

motion). (ECF No. 23.) As a result, the Court finds that the requested 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) fee of

$10,000.00 is reasonable.

The Court GRANTS attorney Adrienne Pietropaolo’s December 3, 2014 motion for an

award of attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) and awards $10,000.00 in attorney fees. (ECF

No. 24.)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Gregory L. Frost 

GREGORY L. FROST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case: 2:12-cv-00542-GLF-MRA Doc #: 25 Filed: 02/04/15 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

I, H. JamesSerrone, certify that:

 

1.       I have reviewed  this  quarterly report on Form  10-QSB of Torotel, Inc. (the “registrant”).

 

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.       The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

 

(a)               Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and  procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, ismade known to us by others within the entity, particularly during the periodin  which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)              Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)               Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that  occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is  reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.       The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlsover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors:

 

(a)               All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)              Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a  significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 
| /s/ H. James Serrone    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| H. James Serrone        |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| March 17, 2008     |   |

 

 

----
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-3877 Directorate ID: 2015-SW-039-AD

Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters Model AS332C, AS332C1, AS332L, and AS332L1

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 19 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to detect and prevent structural damage to the tail 

rotor (T/R) blades caused by overheating, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $167,644 (4-blade T/R set)

$209,555 (5-blade T/R set)

Labor per Helicopter

(1 work-hour X $85 for 

inspection)

(2 work-hours X $85 for 

deactivation)

(0.5 work-hour X $85 for 

RFM revision)

(0.5 work-hour X $85 for 

placard)

(3 work-hours X $85 for 

blade replacement)

$85

$170

$43

$43

$255

Other

(Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $85 per inspection

$170 for the deactivation

$43 for the RFM revision

$43 for the placard

$167,899 (replacement, 4-blade T/R set)

$209,810 (replacement, 5-blade T/R set)

Total U.S. Fleet Cost $1,615 per inspection

$3,230 for the deactivation

$817 for the RFM revision

$817 for the placard

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()
2

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: George Schwab