alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 383/2011

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.383.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 383 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5430 December 2011 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.383.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 383

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5430 December 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 383/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2011 to 31 October 2011(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2011/C 383/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2011 to 31 October 2011(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 17 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 383/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2011 to 31 October 2011(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2011/C 383/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2011 to 31 October 2011(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

17

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-82,850-01 and -02

EX PARTE ANTHONY EUGENE JOHNSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. W08-71994-V(A) AND W11-00273-V(A) IN THE 292nd DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

assault and manslaughter and sentenced to ten and twenty years’ imprisonment, respectively. The

Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Johnson v. State, Nos. 05-12-00743-CR &

05-12-00744-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas July 3, 2013) (not designated for publication). 

On October 7, 2015 the parties were ordered to brief the following issues:

A. The standard for harm set out in Vasquez v. State, 830 S.W.2d 948 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1992), is the proper standard when trial counsel fails to request

a jury instruction. In Vasquez, this Court held that, due to trial counsel’s

failure to request an instruction on the defensive issue of necessity, the jury
2

was precluded from giving affect to the appellant’s defense and that “in itself

undermines our confidence in the conviction sufficiently to convince us that

the rest of the trial might have been different had the instruction been

requested and given.” Id. at 951; and

B. Counsel rendered ineffective assistance in this case.

The briefs of the parties were due by December 7, 2015.

On October 20, 2015 this Court received a letter notifying the Court that in both cases the

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law signed by the habeas judge had been vacated prior to being

sent to this Court on March 13, 2015. The order vacating the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of

Law was included with the letter. 

This Court relied on the vacated Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law when it set these

cases to be briefed. It is now clear from the record that the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

are void and that the records were forwarded prematurely. New Findings of Fact and Conclusions

of Law in these cases need to be filed and sent to this Court.

These applications will be held in abeyance until the habeas court has resolved the fact issues. 

We now remand these applications to the 292 District Court of Dallas County to allow the judge

nd

assigned to these cases to complete an evidentiary investigation and enter Findings of Fact and

Conclusions of Law. Supplemental records containing the new habeas judge’s supplemental

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and any supporting affidavits and transcripts, shall be

forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be

obtained from this Court. These applications and the briefing orders will be held in abeyance until

further orders from this Court. 

Filed: October 28, 2015

Do not publish
WILLIE EDWARD DOZIER , Petitioner,

v. STATE OF FLORIDA , Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2812

Opinion filed October 19, 2016. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

-- Original Jurisdiction

. Willie Edward Dozier, pro se , Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Baker v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).2 Petitioner is warned that the filing of any further successive or unauthorized pleadings concerning Duval County Circuit Court case number 16

- 2008

- CF

- 0143 39

- AXXX

- MA may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to a bar on further pro se appearances before this court. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.410. BILBREY and M.K. THOMAS, JJ. , CONCUR ; KELSEY, J., dissents in part with opinion

.3 KELSEY , J., dissenting in part. I concur in the dismissal of the present petition, styled "The All Great Writ." I respectfully dissent, however, as to imposing sanctions barring any additional pro se filings seeking relief from the same judgment and sentence c hallenged here and in at least five prior cases in this Court. The Court issued a show

- cause order under State v. Spencer , 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Petitioner responded that he should be allowed many more frivolous filings before he is barred, citi ng cases in which we have allowed over two dozen filings determined to be without merit before entering a sanction order barring further pro se filings. Petitioner has not yet raised any meritorious challenge to his judgment and sentence, and in response to our show cause order he has not articulated any meritorious challenges yet to be raised. I fully respect petitioner's constitutional right of access to courts, but on these facts I conclude that his constitutional rights to access this Court have been satisfied, and I would immediately prohibit petitioner from filing any additional pro se challenges to the same judgment and sentence at issue here.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 121 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 121

Supporting May 2005 as ``National Better Hearing and Speech Month'' and 
     commending those States that have implemented routine hearing 
  screenings for every newborn before the newborn leaves the hospital.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2005

Mr. Coleman (for himself, Mr. Lieberman, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Durbin, and Mr. 
Bunning) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

               April 29 (legislative day, April 28), 2005

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting May 2005 as ``National Better Hearing and Speech Month'' and 
     commending those States that have implemented routine hearing 
  screenings for every newborn before the newborn leaves the hospital.

Whereas the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders 
        reports that approximately 28,000,000 people in the United States 
        experience hearing loss or have a hearing impairment;
Whereas 1 out of every 3 people in the United States over the age of 65 have 
        hearing loss;
Whereas the overwhelming majority of people in the United States with hearing 
        loss would benefit from the use of a hearing aid and fewer than 
        7,000,000 people in the United States use a hearing aid;
Whereas 30 percent of people in the United States suffering from hearing loss 
        cite financial constraints as an impediment to hearing aid use;
Whereas hearing loss is among the most common congenital birth defects;
Whereas a delay in diagnosing the hearing loss of a newborn can affect the 
        social, emotional, and academic development of the child;
Whereas the average age at which newborns with hearing loss are diagnosed is 
        between the ages of 12 to 25 months; and
Whereas May 2005 is ``National Better Hearing and Speech Month'', providing 
        Federal, State, and local governments, members of the private and 
        nonprofit sectors, hearing and speech professionals, and all people in 
        the United States an opportunity to focus on preventing, mitigating, and 
        treating hearing impairments: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of May 2005 as ``National 
        Better Hearing and Speech Month'';
            (2) commends those States that have implemented routine 
        hearing screenings for every newborn before the newborn leaves 
        the hospital; and
            (3) encourages all people in the United States to have 
        their hearing checked regularly.
                                 <all>
```
Before the Third Division,

November 22, 1949

No. 53734.

protest 58646-K (New York).

#### Satisfaction Supply Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that thé issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry. The protest was sustained to this extent.
----

Call for proposals for Pilot Projects on civil protection cross border co-operation in the fight against natural disasters

(2006/C 176/13)

----
No. 64292.

protest 59/18010, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Castelazo & Associates and The Wolsey Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “triangles, squares, adjustable triangles, rules, French curves, and protractors, composed of acrylic plastic containing no filler material, and are not similar in use to any enumerated dutiable article,” the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 176 

Congratulating Cam Neely on his induction into the Hockey Hall of Fame. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 20, 2005 

Mr. KENNEDY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Cam Neely on his induction into the Hockey 

Hall of Fame. 

Whereas on June 8, 2005, Cam Neely was elected to the 

Hockey Hall of Fame in Toronto, Canada, and will be 

formally inducted into the Hall of Fame on November 7, 

2005; 

Whereas as a member of the Boston Bruins, Cam Neely became one of ice hockey’s greatest players, defining the 

position of ‘‘power forward’’; 

Whereas although his career was cut short when he retired 

at the age of 31 due to injury, Cam Neely scored 395 

goals and had 299 assists in 726 games in his brilliant 

career; 
2 

•SRES 176 IS

Whereas Cam Neely led the Boston Bruins in goals for 7 seasons, led the team in scoring for 2 seasons, and was the 

team’s all-time leader in goals during playoffs; 

Whereas Cam Neely had three 50-goal seasons for the Boston 

Bruins, including back-to-back 50-goal seasons in 1989– 

1990 and 1991–1992; 

Whereas Cam Neely, returning to the Boston Bruins after an 

injury in 1993–1994, scored 50 goals and was awarded 

the National Hockey League’s Bill Masterton Trophy as 

the ‘‘player who best exemplifies the qualities of perseverance, sportsmanship, and dedication to hockey’’; 

Whereas Cam Neely, number 8, became the tenth Boston 

Bruin to be honored by having his uniform number retired; and 

Whereas Cam Neely continues to provide invaluable assistance to charitable causes in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, including the establishment of the Neely House 

and the Neely Foundation, which comfort, support, and 

offer hope to cancer patients and their families: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) honors the extraordinary achievements of 

3 Cam Neely during his brilliant career in ice hockey 

4 with the Boston Bruins; 

5 (2) commends Cam Neely for his recent and 

6 eminently well-deserved induction into the Hockey 

7 Hall of Fame; and 

8 (3) directs the Secretary of the Senate to trans9 mit an enrolled copy of this resolution to: 
3 

•SRES 176 IS

1 (A) Cam Neely; 

2 (B) Jeremy Jacobs, owner of the Boston 

3 Bruins; 

4 (C) Harry Sinden, president of the Boston 

5 Bruins; and 

6 (D) Mike Sullivan, head coach of the Bos7 ton Bruins. 

Æ
<PAGE>
                                    EXHIBIT 12

                           THOMAS & BETTS CORPORATION
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (Thousands of Dollars)
<TABLE>
                                        
                      Nine Months
                      Ended                  For the Years Ended             
<s >                  <C>       <C>      <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
                      Sept. 29, Dec 31,  Jan. 1,    Jan. 2,  Dec. 31,  Dec. 31, 
                      1996      1995     1995      1994      1992      1991  

Earnings from  
 continuing operations          
 before income taxes  $103,027  $117,170 $    494   $59,942   $52,983   $55,465

Add:
 Interest on  
  indebtedness          32,798    28,299   26,852    30,247    33,405    12,752 
  
 Amortization of 
 debt expense              905     1,364    1,133     1,062     2,538      -  

 Portion of rents 
 representative of
 the interest factor     5,943     7,920    7,377     7,011     6,515     3,816 

Deduct:
 Interest capitalized
  and undistributed 
  earnings from less-
  than-50-percent-
  owned entities        (6,393)   (2,848)  (1,863)       -       -        (376)

Earnings 
 as adjusted          $136,280  $151,905  $33,993   $98,262   $95,441   $71,657 

Fixed charges: 
 Interest on
  indebtedness         $32,798   $28,299  $26,852   $30,247   $33,405   $12,752
 
 Amortization of
 debt expense              905     1,364    1,133     1,062     2,538      -  

 Portion of rents
 representative of
 the interest factor     5,943     7,920    7,377     7,011     6,515     3,816
 
Total fixed charges   $ 39,646  $ 37,583  $35,362   $38,320   $42,458   $16,568

Ratio of earnings
 to fixed charges         3.4x      4.0x    0.96x       2.6       2.2x     4.3x

</TABLE>
The ratio for the year ended January 1, 1995 of 0.96x, was inadequate to cover
fixed charges by $1,369.  This was due to a provision for restructuring
operations of $79,011 provided in the third quarter of 1994.
**
**Exhibit 34.14**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Tothe Board of Directors 

Situs Holdings, LLC 

We have examined management’sassertion, included in the accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (Management’s Assertion), that Situs Holdings, LLC (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(3)(i)and 1122(d)(4)(vii) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Regulation AB (the applicable servicing criteria) for services by the Company that are encompassed by contractual obligations to perform Regulation AB reporting for theOperating or Trust Advisor Services Platform (the “Platform”), including only those asset-backed securities transactions defined below, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018. Appendix B to management’s assertionidentifies the individual asset-backed transactions defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for Situs Holdings, LLC’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express anopinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination. 

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, includedexamining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed thoseactivities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by theCompany during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliancearising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides areasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In ouropinion, management’s assertion that Situs Holdings, LLC complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

 

/s/ RSM US LLP

Duluth, Minnesota

January 31, 2019

 
1 

**
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of TransTechnology Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 28, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date:       February 10, 2004           /s/ Robert L. G. White
       ---------------------------      ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert L. G. White,
                                        President & Chief Executive Officer


Date:       February  10, 2004          /s/ Joseph F. Spanier
       ---------------------------      ----------------------------------------
                                        Joseph  F. Spanier,
                                        Chief Financial Officer


                                       24
No. 62042.

#### Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 241251-K, etc. (El Paso).

*592Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 92 (Tuesday, May 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27362-27363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10940]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8730]

Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Expressionism in Germany and France: From Van Gogh to 
Kandinsky''

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 14, 2014, notice was published on page 20960 of the 
Federal Register (volume 79, number 71) of determinations made by the 
Department of State pertaining to the exhibition ``Expressionism in 
Germany and France: From Van Gogh to Kandinsky.'' The referenced notice 
is corrected here to include an additional object as part of the 
exhibition. Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the additional object 
to be included in the exhibition ``Expressionism in Germany and France: 
From Van Gogh to

[[Page 27363]]

Kandinsky,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the additional object 
at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Los Angeles, California, from 
on or about June 8, 2014, until on or about September 14, 2014, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
description of the additional object, contact Paul W. Manning, 
Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: May 7, 2014.
Evan Ryan,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-10940 Filed 5-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```