alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007283EN.01003101.xml

| 24.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/31

---

Appeal brought on 19 September 2007 by Commission of the European Communities against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 5 July 2007 in Case F-26/06, Bertolete and Others v Commission

(Case T-359/07 P)

(2007/C 283/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Martin and L. Lozano Palacios, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: M. Bertolete (Wolowé-Saint-Lambert, Belgiun), A.P. Cunha Correia (Koekelberg, Belgium), M. Lichteveld (Wavre, Belgium), M. Mozelsio (Enghien, Belgium), F. Orlando (Anderlecht, Belgium), F. Pendville (Etterbeek, Belgium), B. Simons (Bocholt, Belgium), D. Sneessens (Auderghem, Belgium), S. Voisin (Forest, Belgium)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought by the appellant

| — | Annul the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 5 July 2007 in Case F-26/06; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 5 July 2007 in Case F-26/06;

| — | refer the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal; |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal;

| — | reserve the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

reserve the costs;

| — | in the alternative, annul the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 5 July 2007 in Case F-26/06 and, in determining the present case itself, grant the forms of order sought by the defendant at first instance, and therefore, dismiss the action in Case F-26/06; order the defendant in the appeal to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 5 July 2007 in Case F-26/06 and, in determining the present case itself, grant the forms of order sought by the defendant at first instance, and therefore, dismiss the action in Case F-26/06; order the defendant in the appeal to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By judgment of 5 July 2007 in Case F-26/06, Bertolete and Others v Commission, the Civil Service Tribunal (CST) annulled the decisions by which the Commission fixed the applicants' grading and remuneration under contracts for members of the contract staff. The applicants, former salaried employees under Belgian law, were engaged as nursery school teachers following a change to the regime applicable to other servants of the Communities.

Bertolete and Others

Commission

The Commission's first plea in support of its appeal alleges an error of law in that the Civil Service Tribunal misconstrued the scope of the principle of equal treatment in its interpretation of the applicable provisions, in particular in relation to the definition used by the Commission to include family allowances in the definition of remuneration.

The second plea alleges breach of the principle of the obligation to state reasons in that the Civil Service Tribunal did not rule on the concept of remuneration.

---
### FW: Eramet Wittberg, Richard A to : Conrad Chin Cc : ccbeidler This message has been foJWarded
. 2 attachments



# [8 

# il AIT371179.txt p.hoto.JPG
Last one.

----- Or i g inal Message----- From: Danajsinger [ma ilt o:danajs in ger®gmail .com] Sent: TUesday, May 01, 2012 10:34 AM To: Wittberg, Richard A Subject: Eramet 05/01/2012 11 :45 AM
[4910-13-P]

14 CFR Part 39

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

(Yf32.

[Docket No. FAA-2010-*****; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-OOI-AD]

R1N 212Q-AA64

Airworthiness Directivesj Bombardier, inc. Model DHC-8-200 and

DHC-8-300 Series Airplanes

,~

,~, fM--:f

~

&~

DATE

~-, 3w,j;"

.J(}JA - ift

7lJJl8V),,~

ID

OUTI. S\

";" - (Of

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

I

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the product

DurING SYMOO

4v;'1-IVO

listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continwng airworthiness

information (MeAl) originated by an aviatlon authority of another country to identify

ROUTI>I() SYMBOL

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe

condition as:

OlJTI>Il) 'VMl!Ol

During a recent production fuel system test, it was found that all three

flapper valves located in each collector tank did riot confonn to the design

requirements, due to the fact that a valve spring was installed on the

flapper hinge pin. This valve spring should have been removed prior to

install~tion of the valves.

NITIAI.SISlG

* * * * * * *

NITlAUiSIG

* * * * * * *

With the valve spring installed, the flapper valve is held closed by the

valve spring, preventing gravity feed. In the event of scavenge system

failure, the collector tank fuel level can no longer be maintained,

potentially leading to an in-flight engine shutdown.

I
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAnON

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

IDocket No. FAA-2010·*"'***; »irectoratc Identifier 2010-NM-OOI-ADI

RIN 2120·AA64

1<00""" "',",,,,,r,

ANE-173

Airworthiness Dkectivcs; Bombardi~r. Inc. Model DHC·8-200 and

DHC·g·300 Sedes Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed mlcmak.ing (NPRM).

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for tbe products

listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness

infomlation (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product The MeAl describes the unsafe 3.~ tetD

condition as:

During a recent production fuel system test. it was found that all three

flapper valves located in eaeh collector tank did not conform to the design

requirements, due to the fact that a valve spring waslinstalled on the

flapper hinge pin. This valve sprillg should have boon removed prior to

installation ofille valves.

1~''••.

"~R

,,"",..'''''';

• • • • • • •

With the valve spring installed, the flapper valve is held closed by the

valve sprillg, preventing gravity feed. In the event of scavenge system

failure, the collector tank fuel level can no longer be maintained,

potentially leading to Iln in-flight engine shutdown .

I~"'".'''''''

• • • • • • •
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ZEC, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, E. Thomas Layton, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 12, 2017 By: /s/ E. Thomas Layton

E. Thomas Layton

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409), and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515. License No.
Name/address
Date reissued017126N
Daily Freight Cargo, Corp., 8538 NW 70th Street, Miami, FL 33166
January 19, 2007.017121F
Freight Logistics Services, LLC, 21905 64th Avenue West, Suite 301-A, Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043
March 24, 2007.018123F
Susie Gonzalez, Inc. dba F.R.I.E.N.D.S. Cargo Int'l, 8367 NW 74th Street, Miami, FL 33166
March 2, 2007.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. E7-7354 Filed 4-17-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
<PAGE>

                           AMENDMENT TO SECURITY AGREEMENT


     THIS AMENDMENT to that certain Security Agreement, dated December 22, 1999
(the "Security Agreement"), between Tipperary Corporation, a Texas corporation
("Debtor"), and Slough Estates USA Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Secured
Party"), is made this 11th day of March 1999, between Debtor and Secured Party.

     WHEREAS, the parties entered into the Security Agreement to secure
performance and payment of certain Promissory Notes, (i) the first, dated
December 22, 1998, payable to Secured Party by Debtor in the amount of
$5,500,000 (the "$5.5 Million Note") and (ii) the second, dated December 22,
1998, payable to Secured Party by Tipperary Oil & Gas (Australia) Pty Ltd., in
the amount of $6,000,000 (the "$6.0 Million Note"); and

     WHEREAS, the Debtor is executing a Promissory Note, of even date herewith,
in the principal amount of $6.5 million (the "$6.5 Million Note"), in
consideration of the cancellation of the $5.5 Million Note and receipt of $1.0
million from Secured Party; and

     WHEREAS, the parties desire that the Security Agreement and collateral
provided therein shall secure repayment of the $6.5 Million Note in the same
respects as the $5.5 Million Note;

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the loan evidenced by the $6.5 Million
Note and the promises of the parties evidenced thereby and hereby:

     1.   The Security Agreement is hereby amended in that, as of, and after the
execution of the $6.5 Million note, all references in the Security Agreement to
the "Promissory Note" shall be deemed to be to the $6.5 Million Note (in place
of the $5.5 Million Note as therein provided before this Amendment) and the $6.0
Million Note.  All provisions in the Security Agreement shall otherwise remain
unchanged, and the Security Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

TIPPERARY CORPORATION                   SLOUGH ESTATES USA INC.



By:  /s/ David L. Bradshaw              By:  /s/ R. W. Rohner
   --------------------------------        -------------------------------------
   David L. Bradshaw, President and        Randall W. Rohner, Vice President and
   Chief Executive Officer                 Chief Financial Officer
# C_2007211EN.01000902.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 July 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria

(Case C-517/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2003/98/EC - Re-use of public sector information - Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)

(2007/C 211/16)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Braun and E. Montaguti, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Austria (represented by: E. Riedl, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the period prescribed, all the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information (OJ 2003 L 345, p. 90)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt in the legislation of the Länder of Styria and Salzburg, within the period prescribed, all the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt in the legislation of the Länder of Styria and Salzburg, within the period prescribed, all the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 42, 24.2.2007.

1

---
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 295 

Expressing the sense of the Senate on the arrest of Sanjar Umarov in 

Uzbekistan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2005 

Mr. LUGAR (for himself, Mr. FRIST, and Mr. MCCAIN) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate on the arrest of Sanjar 

Umarov in Uzbekistan. 

Whereas the United States supports the development of democracy, free markets, and civil society in Uzbekistan 

and in other states in Central Asia; 

Whereas the rule of law, the impartial application of the law, 

and equal justice for all courts of law are pillars of all 

democratic societies; 

Whereas Sanjar Umarov was reportedly arrested in 

Tashkent, Uzbekistan, on October 22, 2005; 

Whereas Sanjar Umarov is a businessman and leader of the 

Uzbek opposition party, Sunshine Coalition; 

Whereas Sanjar Umarov was reportedly taken into custody 

on October 22, 2005, during a crackdown on the Sun-
2 

•SRES 295 ATS

shine Coalition that included a raid of its offices and seizure of its records; 

Whereas Sanjar Umarov was reportedly charged with grand 

larceny; 

Whereas press accounts report that representatives of Sanjar 

Umarov claim that Mr. Umarov was drugged and abused 

while at his pretrial confinement center in Tashkent, 

Uzbekistan, but such accounts could not be immediately 

confirmed, and official information about the health, 

whereabouts, and treatment while in custody of Mr. 

Umarov has thus far been unavailable; 

Whereas the United States has expressed its serious concern 

regarding the overall state of human rights in Uzbekistan 

and is seeking to clarify the facts of this case; 

Whereas the European Union (EU) and the Organization for 

Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) have expressed concern about the arrest and possible abuse of 

Sanjar Umarov; and 

Whereas the Government of Uzbekistan is party to various 

treaty obligations, and in particular those under the 

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 

which obligate governments to provide for due process in 

criminal cases: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 

2 (1) the law enforcement and judicial authorities 

3 of Uzbekistan should ensure that Sanjar Umarov is 

4 accorded the full measure of his rights under the 

5 Uzbekistan Constitution to defend himself against 

6 any and all charges that may be brought against 
3 

•SRES 295 ATS

1 him, in a fair and transparent process, so that indi2 vidual justice may be done; 

3 (2) the Government of Uzbekistan should ob4 serve its various treaty obligations, especially those 

5 under the International Covenant on Civil and Polit6 ical Rights, which obligate governments to provide 

7 for due process in criminal cases; and 

8 (3) the Government of Uzbekistan should pub9 licly clarify the charges against Sanjar Umarov, his 

10 current condition, and his whereabouts. 

Æ
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 203 

Recognizing the 75th anniversary of the establishment of the Veterans’ Administration and acknowledging the achievements of the Veterans’ Administration and the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2005 

Mr. CRAIG (for himself and Mr. AKAKA) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 75th anniversary of the establishment of 

the Veterans’ Administration and acknowledging the 

achievements of the Veterans’ Administration and the 

Department of Veterans Affairs. 

Whereas in the history of the United States more than 

48,000,000 citizen-soldiers have served the United States 

in uniform and more than 1,000,000 have given their 

lives as a consequence of their duties; 

Whereas as of July 21, 2005, there are more than 

25,000,000 living veterans; 

Whereas on March 4, 1865, President Abraham Lincoln expressed in his Second Inaugural Address the obligation of 

the United States ‘‘to care for him who shall have borne 

the battle and for his widow and his orphan’’; 
2 

•SRES 203 ATS

Whereas on July 21, 1930, President Herbert Hoover issued 

an executive order creating a new agency, the Veterans’ 

Administration, to ‘‘consolidate and coordinate Government activities affecting war veterans’’; 

Whereas on October 25, 1988, President Ronald Reagan 

signed into law the Department of Veterans Affairs Act 

(Public Law 100–527; 102 Stat. 2635), effective March 

15, 1989, redesignating the Veterans’ Administration as 

the Department of Veterans Affairs and establishing it as 

an executive department with the mission of providing 

Federal benefits to veterans and their families; and 

Whereas in 2005, the 230,000 employees of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs continue the tradition of their predecessors of caring for the veterans of the United States 

with dedication and compassion and upholding the high 

standards required of them as stewards of the gratitude 

of the public to those veterans: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the 75th anniversary of the es3 tablishment of the Veterans’ Administration; and 

4 (2) acknowledges the achievements of the em5 ployees of the Veterans’ Administration and the De6 partment of Veterans Affairs and commends these 

7 employees for serving the veterans of the United 

8 States. 

Æ
1

FRA’s ATIP – Automated Track Inspection Program (December 2023)

ATIP fleet

• 3 Staffed geometry platforms (DOTX 216 transferred 

from MERMEC to ENSCO and is in a transition period)

• 3 Autonomous geometry cars (ENSCO & Tetra Tech)

• 1 Hi-rail geometry vehicle

• 1 Hi-rail ultrasonic rail test vehicle (the DOTX 305 is a 

new asset for ATIP and is paying dividends)

Research to reality

FRA pioneered automated track inspection 

technology now used by every Class I railroad.

Data collected by ATIP vehicles support:

• Track safety trend analyses

• State of good repair assessments

• Provide data to railroads for targeted repairs and 

improved maintenance

• GIS mapping

• Risk analyses

• Manual inspection resource allocation

• Foot-by-foot analyses 

• Asset inventory

• Research by various departments, agencies, 

universities

• Machine learning

• Research and development

FRA has three contractors for ATIP

The two new contracts for operators were awarded in 

April 2023 to ENSCO and Tetra Tech. (The Tetra Tech 

vehicle is a contractor-owned, contractor-operated 

survey car).

ATIP Operations 2021 2022 2023 (Thru 11/30)

Miles Surveyed 152,670 179,442 163,246

Total Exceptions 7,951 9,177 7,640

Safety Critical Exc. 1,898 2,108 1,390
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

EMMA RHODES,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

RLJ MANAGEMENT COMPANY, CASE NO. 2:12-cv-00321

JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

Defendant. MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK R. ABEL

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the Order filed January 29, 2013, JUDGMENT is hereby entered

DISMISSING this case.

Date: January 29, 2013 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-00321-EAS-MRA Doc #: 12 Filed: 01/29/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

            <S>     <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TOROTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONTAINED IN ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
JANUARY 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                 JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                                           84,000
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 3,498,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     94,000
<INVENTORY>                                                   2,652,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                6,630,000
<PP&E>                                                        4,290,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                2,402,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                8,467,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         2,519,000
<BONDS>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    2,303,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  8,467,000
<SALES>                                                      11,943,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             11,943,000
<CGS>                                                         8,788,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                11,711,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               (516,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              244,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 504,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    172,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             332,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    332,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       .12


        

</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

January 5, 1939

No. 40314.

#### Protest 958015-G of S. S. Perry (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

On the authority of *Akawo*v. *United States*(T. D. 48067) the protest was sustained.