### Name: Ms. Tiffany Le

Title: Senior Environmental Scientist Company: Kansas City Board of Public Utilities Sign Date: Name: Mr. Jeremy Miller Title: Lead Field Engineer Company: GE International, Inc. Sign Date: Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date 

## Kansas City Board of Public Utilities

Final Test Report for

/ / Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information in this test report are true, accurate, and complete. I have reviewed all testing details and results in this test report and hereby certify that the test report is authentic and accurate.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 Page 1 of 11

### Kansas City Board of Public Utilities

Facility Information: Quindaro Power Station
3601 North 12th Street

Kansas City KS 66104 Contact: Ms. Tiffany Le Phone: 913-573-9789 Fax: 913-328-6281 Email: tle@bpu.com Testing Company: GE International, Inc.
888 Industrial Drive

Elmhurst IL 60126 Contact: Mr. Jeremy Miller Phone: 219-838-6082 Fax: 219-838-6083 Email: jeremy1.miller@ge.com

Air Permit Number: 2090048 Permitted Source ID/Name: Quindaro Power Station 1295 Permitted Maximum Process Rate: 144 MW Max. Normal Operation Process Rate: 119 MW Target Process Test Rate 100 MW

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or process flow diagram: The flue gas is controlled via an Electrostatic Precipitator. Industry/SCC/NAIS 221112

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information: AFS #: 2020900048 FRS #: 110000445368

SCC / Description

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location Round

Duct Diam. Distance from upstream dist. Distance from

downstream dist. Number of

Traverse Ports Equiv. Diam Min.Travers Points Rect. Duct Length /Width Unit 2 Stack 159.96 624 2940 4 0 24 0 0

Target Parameter Test Method Number of

Test Runs Test Run

Duration Sample

Points Comments Location Cadmium Method 29 3 240 0 Unit 2 Stack Lead Method 29 3 240 0 Unit 2 Stack Nickel Method 29 3 240 0 Unit 2 Stack Antimony Method 29 3 240 0 Unit 2 Stack Manganese Method 29 3 240 0 Unit 2 Stack Chromium Method 29 3 240 0 Unit 2 Stack Beryllium Method 29 3 240 0 Unit 2 Stack Arsenic Method 29 3 240 0 Unit 2 Stack



### Wednesday, February 23, 2011 Page 2 of 11

### Kansas City Board of Public Utilities

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation of request AND approval, including dates. Because of the port parameters OTM27/OTM28 was supplanted with M5/OTM28. Teflon liners were also used as a precaution due to the long port lengths and subsequently long particulate probes. Both modifications had prior EPA approval. Selenium Method 29 3 240 0 Unit 2 Stack Cobalt Method 29 3 240 0 Unit 2 Stack Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 400 0 Unit 2 Stack O2 Method 3A O2 3 400 0 Unit 2 Stack Filterable Particulate Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0 Unit 2 Stack Total Particulate Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0 Unit 2 Stack Organic Condensible

Particulate Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0 Unit 2 Stack
Inorganic (Aqueous)

Condensible Part. Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0 Unit 2 Stack

Filterable Particulate Method 5 3 240 0 Unit 2 Stack



### Wednesday, February 23, 2011 Page 3 of 11

### Kansas City Board of Public Utilities

Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary



### Location Unit 2 Stack - Method 29 Average Run Number 1 2 3
Test Date 6/15/2010 6/16/2010 6/18/2010 Run Start Time 2:40:00 PM 8:50:00 AM 9:35:00 AM

Run Finish Time 8:10:00 PM 2:00:00 PM 2:40:00 PM Net Run Time, minutes 240 240 240 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 142.909 142.898 136.690 140.832 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 10.70 11.10 10.54 10.780 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.000 Carbon Dioxide, % 11.8 12.4 11.3 11.833 Oxygen, % 8.2 7.7 8.8 8.233 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 310.90 313.44 303.85 309.397 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 268,394.3 266,684.3 258,136.9 264,405.167 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 456,518.9 455,095.4 434,580.5 448,731.600 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.1 101.7 100.5 101.100 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 10025 9031 9275 9,443.667
Fw 0 0 0 0.000
Fc 1901 1797 1833 1,843.667



### Wednesday, February 23, 2011 Page 4 of 11

### Kansas City Board of Public Utilities

Location Unit 2 Stack - Method 5 Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time
Run Finish Time Net Run Time, minutes Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2
Fw
Fc



### Location Unit 2 Stack - Method 5/OTM-28 Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Net Run Time, minutes Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2
Fw
Fc



### Wednesday, February 23, 2011 Page 5 of 11

### Kansas City Board of Public Utilities

Emissions Summary



### Location: Unit 2 Stack - Method 29 Compound: Antimony Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.0028 0.0028 0.00298 0.003 lb/mmBtuO2 7.13E-07 6.18E-07 7.70E-07 0.000 

### Compound: Arsenic Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.00679 0.00747 0.00903 0.008 lb/mmBtuO2 1.73E-06 1.65E-06 2.33E-06 0.000 

### Compound: Beryllium Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.00097 0.00099 0.00131 0.001 lb/mmBtuO2 2.47E-07 2.18E-07 3.38E-07 0.000 

### Compound: Cadmium Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.00092 0.00132 0.00125 0.001 lb/mmBtuO2 2.34E-07 2.91E-07 3.23E-07 0.000 

### Compound: Chromium Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.00983 0.00984 0.02837 0.016 lb/mmBtuO2 2.50E-06 2.17E-06 7.33E-06 0.000 

### Compound: Cobalt Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.00405 0.00431 0.00725 0.005 lb/mmBtuO2 1.03E-06 9.51E-07 1.87E-06 0.000 

### Compound: Lead Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.01479 0.01349 0.01949 0.016 lb/mmBtuO2 3.76E-06 2.98E-06 5.04E-06 0.000 

### Compound: Manganese Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.03923 0.04533 0.05883 0.048 lb/mmBtuO2 9.98E-06 1.00E-05 1.52E-05 0.000 

### Compound: Nickel Average



### Wednesday, February 23, 2011 Page 6 of 11

### Kansas City Board of Public Utilities

Process Run Data RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.01337 0.01207 0.04187 0.022 lb/mmBtuO2 3.40E-06 2.66E-06 1.08E-05 0.000 

### Compound: Selenium Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.0164 0.0232 0.0147 0.018 lb/mmBtuO2 4.17E-06 5.12E-06 3.80E-06 0.000



### Location: Unit 2 Stack - Method 5 Compound: Filterable Particulate Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 79.7 81 159.8 106.833 lb/mmBtuO2 2.03E-02 1.79E-02 4.13E-02 0.027



### Location: Unit 2 Stack - Method 5/OTM-28 

### Compound: Filterable Particulate Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 90.6 99.2 177.7 122.500 lb/mmBtuO2 2.34E-02 2.19E-02 4.53E-02 0.030 

### Compound: Inorganic (Aqueous) Condensible Pa Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 18.02 20.32 13.82 17.387 lb/mmBtuO2 4.66E-03 4.49E-03 3.52E-03 0.004 

### Compound: Organic Condensible Particulate Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 4.08 4.08 3.38 3.847 lb/mmBtuO2 1.05E-03 9.01E-04 8.61E-04 0.001 

### Compound: Total Particulate Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 112.7 123.6 194.9 143.733 lb/mmBtuO2 2.91E-02 2.73E-02 4.97E-02 0.035



### Wednesday, February 23, 2011 Page 7 of 11

### Kansas City Board of Public Utilities

Process Run Data

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data 

### Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value 1 Coal Firing Rate 0.0545 1000 tons/hr 0


### 1 Gross Megawatt 92.9 MW/hr 0
1 Heat Input 1152 MMBtu/hr 0
2 Coal Firing Rate 0.0562 1000 tons/hr 0


### 2 Gross Megawatt 96.1 MW/hr 0
2 Heat Input 1157.1 MMBtu/hr 0
3 Coal Firing Rate 0.05 1000 tons/hr 0


### 3 Gross Megawatt 85.1 MW/hr 0
3 Heat Input 1084.5 MMBtu/hr 0



### Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value 1 LOW NOX BURNERS 0 0


### 1 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR 0 0

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 Page 8 of 11

### Kansas City Board of Public Utilities

Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail



### Location Unit 2 Stack - Method 29 Average Run Number 1 2 3 Test Date 6/15/2010 6/16/2010 6/18/2010 Run Start Time 2:40:00 PM 8:50:00 AM 9:35:00 AM Run Finish Time 8:10:00 PM 2:00:00 PM 2:40:00 PM Net Traversing Points 48 48 48 Net Run Time, minutes 240 240 240 Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.237 0.237 0.237 0.237 Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.009 1.009 1.009 1.009 Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.82 28.95 28.8 28.857 Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.13 1.13 1.04 1.100 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 152.901 153.391 147.480 151.257 Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 90.63 94.92 94.76 93.437 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 142.909 142.898 136.690 140.832 Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 363.9 379.1 342.2 361.733 Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 17.13 17.84 16.11 17.027 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 10.70 11.10 10.54 10.780 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.000 Dry Mole Fraction 0.893 0.889 0.8946 0.892 Carbon Dioxide, % 11.8 12.4 11.3 11.833 Oxygen, % 8.2 7.7 8.8 8.233 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80 79.9 79.9 79.933 Fuel Factor 1.08 1.06 1.07 Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.22 30.29 30.16 30.223 Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.91 28.93 28.88 28.907 Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.8 -0.8 -0.8 -0.800 Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.76 28.89 28.74 28.797 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 310.90 313.44 303.85 309.397 Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.6215814451 12051 0.619001810

022396 0.567514184

986363 0.603
Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 54.52 54.35 51.90 53.590 Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 139.557 139.557 139.557 139.557 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 268,394.3 266,684.3 258,136.9 264,405.167 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 456,518.9 455,095.4 434,580.5 448,731.600 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.1 101.7 100.5 101.100 Percent Excess Air, % 63.5 57.5 71.6 64.200 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 10025 9031 9275 9,443.667 Round Duct Diameter, inches 159.96 159.96 159.96 Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0 Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0 Fw 0 0 0 0.000 Fc 1901 1797 1833 1,843.667



### Wednesday, February 23, 2011 Page 9 of 11

### Kansas City Board of Public Utilities

Location Unit 2 Stack - Method 5 Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Net Traversing Points Net Run Time, minutes Nozzle Diameter, inches Pitot Tube Coefficient Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf Total Moisture Liquid collected, g Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % Dry Mole Fraction Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % Fuel Factor Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % Percent Excess Air, % F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Round Duct Diameter, inches Rectangular Duct Width, inches Rectangular Duct Length, inches Fw Fc



### Wednesday, February 23, 2011 Page 10 of 11

### Kansas City Board of Public Utilities

Location Unit 2 Stack - Method 5/OTM-28 Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Net Traversing Points Net Run Time, minutes Nozzle Diameter, inches Pitot Tube Coefficient Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf Total Moisture Liquid collected, g Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % Dry Mole Fraction Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % Fuel Factor Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % Percent Excess Air, % F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Round Duct Diameter, inches Rectangular Duct Width, inches Rectangular Duct Length, inches Fw Fc



### Wednesday, February 23, 2011 Page 11 of 11