alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CONSENT OF TETRA TECH CANADA INC.

The undersigned hereby consents to:

| | (i)  | the use of the written disclosure derived from the report
      entitled Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate for the Las
      Chispas Property, Sonora, Mexico effective February 12, 2018 and dated,
      as amended, May 9, 2018 in the Annual Information Form for the year ended
      December 31, 2018 (AIF) of SilverCrest Metals Inc. (the Company) being
      filed as an exhibit to the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report for the
      period ended December 31, 2018, and any amendments thereto (the 40-F),
      being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission;
      and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
| | (ii) | the use of our name in the AIF and the
  40-F.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

| | TETRA TECH CANADA INC.    
| | --------------------------
| |                           
| |                           
| | /s/ P.
      James F. Barr
| | Name: P. James F. Barr    
| | Title: Senior Geologist   

Date: March 13, 2019

---
Care During Shove Moves

"When in Doubt, Dismount!!"

ü Maintain ongoing crew communication

by repeatedly giving only the distance

known to be clear

ü Continually ensure entire route to be

ridden is clear of unexpected close or no

clearance

From 2011-2021, 27 of the 34 analyzed SOFA Fatalities involved a shove move

SOFA Working Group

Share Knowledge ~ Save a Life ~ Zero Fatalities

As a cross-industry collaboration for over 25 years, the SOFA Working Group has

identified the Possible Contributing Factors for each of the more than 210 switching

operations fatalities since 1992. The SOFA Working Group reports its findings and

emerging data trends with the goal of zero fatalities in the railroad industry.

Prior to beginning a shove move, 

every crew should job brief and 

answer the following questions: 

• What type of car is to be ridden?

• Which side is to be ridden?

• Is there sufficient clearance to ride?

• Where will dismount occur?

• Is it safer to walk any part of the move?

For Every Shove...

ü Ensure a position of safety while riding

and/or mounting/dismounting equipment

ü Update initial job briefing with entire crew

when any circumstance changes

What Happened?

While riding the leading end of a shoving 

movement into a loading dock a conductor 

attempted to dismount moving equipment on to 

a defective stairway, causing him to foul the 

track and be fatally injured between the leading 

car and the platform. 

What Happened?

A crew consisting of a conductor, engineer, 

and trainee were performing work at an 

unattended yard with known clearance 

issues. While shoving a cut of cars the 

conductor was fatally injured by a tree 

branch fouling the track after a storm.

Most Common Findings in Switching Operations Fatalities

Inadequate 

Job Briefing

15%

Close / No 

Clearance

18%

Industry 

Hazard

15%

Struck by 

Mainline Train

11%

Slips, Trips, 

& Falls

11%

Inexperienced 

Employee

19%
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

In connection withthis quarterly report of Torotel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending January 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Dale H. Sizemore, Jr., ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

 

(1)            The reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)            Theinformation contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Dale H.  Sizemore, Jr. |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |   |
| Dale H.  Sizemore, Jr.     |   |
| Chief Executive Officer         |   |
| March 17, 2008             |   |

 

 

----
A90A0596, A90A0597.

#### WESTWIND CORPORATION v. WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION (two cases).

(393 SE2d 479)

Sognier, Judge.

Westwind Corporation filed two appeals in the Superior Court of Hall County from writs of possession granted by a magistrate court to Washington Federal Savings & Loan Association. Both appeals were dismissed under OCGA § 9-11-41 (b) for failure to prosecute. This opinion consolidates Westwind Corporation’s appeals from those dismissals.

1. Appellant enumerates five errors regarding the writs of possession issued by the magistrate court. The record affirmatively establishes that the superior court did not rule on any matters involving the merits of appellant’s appeals from the magistrate court’s orders. There is thus no ruling on these matters which we can properly consider, “for ‘this court will review and correct only such error as was made in the trial court. . . . (Cit.)’ [Cit.]” *Chrysler Corp. v. Marinari,*182 Ga. App. 399, 403 (3) (355 SE2d 719) (1987).

2. The orders dismissing appellant’s appeals recite that the actions were dismissed because neither appellant nor counsel for appellant responded to the jury calendar calls of those actions. These orders met the requirements of OCGA § 9-11-52 (a) and (b). *Scott v. W. S. Badcock Corp.,*161 Ga. App. 826 (1) (289 SE2d 769) (1982). Accordingly, appellant’s fourth enumeration presents no ground for reversal of the superior court’s orders.

*Judgments affirmed.*

*Carley, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.*

*412Decided April 3, 1990

Rehearing denied April 19, 1990

Harrison Cronic, *pro se.*

*Campbell, Martin & Manley, David B. Manley III,*for appellee.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CFO PURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Trinity Capital Corporation, a New Mexico corporation (the “Company”), forthe period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Daniel R. Bartholomew as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Daniel R. Bartholomew |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Daniel R. Bartholomew     |
| Chief Financial Officer   |
| November 9, 2005     |

 

1

----
No. 53723.

protest 136940-K (San Francisco).

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise consists of pimientos, packed in brine, similar in all material respects to those involved in *Von Bremen, Asche, De Bruyn, Inc.*v. *United States*(64 Treas. Dec. 269, T. D. 46643) and that the net drained weight of the pimientos herein is 38.22 pounds per case. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited, it was held that the merchandise is properly dutiable upon the basis of the net drained weight of 38.22 pounds per case at 6 cents per pound under paragraph 775, as claimed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011 (the "Report") of
New Mountain Finance Holdings, L.L.C., New Mountain Finance Corporation and New Mountain Finance AIV Holdings Corporation (the "Registrants"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof, I, Adam B. Weinstein, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrants, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



/s/ ADAM B. WEINSTEINName:

Adam B. WeinsteinDate:

March 7, 2012


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 35.1 

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows: 

(1) The undersigned has caused a reviewof the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and ServicingAgreement, dated as of February 10, 2016 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables2016-A Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and 

(2) To the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forpublicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 26th day of June, 2018.
exv10w01






EXHIBIT 10.01




DESCRIPTION OF GLU MOBILE INC.

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION




(Adopted on October 13, 2006)



The Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee evaluate the appropriate
level and form of compensation for non-employee directors and recommend changes to the Board when
appropriate. In connection with our initial public offering (“IPO”), the Board adopted the
following policy with respect to the compensation of our non-employee directors:




Cash Compensation




	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual Retainer Fee, provided that until the first annual meeting
of stockholders following the IPO, directors who are affiliated
with one of our principal stockholders are not eligible for this
annual base compensation:
	 	$	20,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Lead Independent Director Fee:
	 	$	15,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Committee Fees:
	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee Chair
	 	$	15,000	 
	Audit Committee Member (other than Chair)
	 	$	5,000	 
	Compensation Committee Chair
	 	$	15,000	 
	Compensation Committee Member (other than Chair)
	 	$	5,000	 
	Nominating and Governance Committee Chair
	 	$	5,000	 
	Nominating and Governance Committee Member (other than Chair)
	 	$	5,000	 





All cash compensation will be paid in quarterly installments based upon continuing service. We also
reimburse our directors for reasonable expenses in connection with attendance at Board and
committee meetings.




Equity Compensation



Each year at about the time of our annual meeting of stockholders, each non-employee director will
receive an additional equity award of, at that director’s discretion, either a grant of a number of
shares of restricted stock with a then fair market value equal to $50,000 or an option to purchase
three times as many shares of our common stock, in either case vesting pro rata monthly over one
year.



About the time he or she joins the board, each new non-employee director will receive an initial
equity award of, at that director’s discretion, either a grant of a number of shares of restricted
stock with a then fair market value equal to $150,000 or an option to purchase three times as many
shares of our common stock, in either case vesting as to 16 2/3% of the shares after six months and
thereafter vesting pro rata monthly over the next 30 months.
U.S. Access Board: Rail Vehicles Access Advisory Committee

Subcommittee on Boarding and Alighting Meeting #8

January 29, 2014

1:00 – 3:00 Eastern

1.0 Introductions

2.0 Approval of the Agenda

3.0 Develop rationale and benefits/costs for guidelines that are changing, and consider submitted 

concerns

4.0 Identify potential research needs.

5.0 Discuss recommendations to the DOT.

6.0 Identify subcommittee members to write the report to the full committee.

Next meeting – February 26-27, 2015 at the Access Board office in Washington, DC

[Attachments]
No. 46288.

#### Protest 552785-G/of Tai Wo Tong (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated-that the merchandise in question is the same as that the subject of Abstract 28603. In accordance therewith the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1558 ivas sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                             266
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                       532
<INVENTORY>                                     64,469
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,954
<PP&E>                                         109,922
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,452
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 292,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,969
<BONDS>                                        113,028
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,688
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   292,656
<SALES>                                        107,851
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,239
<CGS>                                           73,002
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,144
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,283
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,261
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,093
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,683
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,410
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (781)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,629
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72
        

</TABLE>
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 150 

Expressing continued support for the construction of the Victims of 

Communism Memorial. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2005 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. SMITH, and Mr. MARTINEZ) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION

Expressing continued support for the construction of the 

Victims of Communism Memorial.

Whereas section 905 of the FRIENDSHIP Act (40 U.S.C. 

1003 note) authorizes the construction of a memorial to 

honor the victims of communism; 

Whereas the construction of a Victims of Communism Memorial near the United States Capitol in the District of Columbia is scheduled to begin in the fall of 2005; 

Whereas construction of the Memorial is supported by many 

Americans whose country of origin is, or was, a ‘‘Captive 

Nation’’, from Baltic-Americans to Vietnamese-Americans; 

Whereas communism has claimed the lives of more than 

100,000,000 people in less than 100 years; and 
2

•SRES 150 ATS

Whereas it is important for the people of the United States 

to honor and remember the victims of communism by 

supporting the construction of this memorial: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate expresses its continued 

2 support for the construction of the Victims of Communism 

3 Memorial.

Æ
J~~1E0 S7ql~S 

C 

o Q 

0 

< pA01E~~\2 

NOV 2 2 19% 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Mr. David T. Deal 

American Petroleum Institute 

1220 L St., N.W. 

Washington, D.C . 20005-4070 

Dear Dave : 

Thank you for your letter of November 13, describing API's concerns about the 

refinery modeling being undertaken by the Department of Energy (DOE) on behalf of 

EPA in connection with our consideration of API's petition on the Phase II RFG NOx 

standard. We and DOE would be happy to meet with you at this time to discuss API's 

concerns, as your letter requests, although DOE's modeling and analysis are still in 

progress . As you know, in response to API's needs, we are committed to completing our 

consideration of the API petition by the end of this year. 

Another option, that you discussed when we met on November 19, would be to 

schedule a meeting when DOE has released a draft of its complet:, modeling results . A 

meeting shortly following the release of the draft could provide an opportunity for you to 

ask clarifying questions that would assist in your review of the refinery cost modeling 

results . DOE is currently expecting to conclude its analysis on December 13, which 

would mean that a draft report should be available for release on December 16. We 

could schedule a meeting as early as Monday, December 23 . 

The purpose of the meeting would be to provide an explanation of the information 

contained in the DOE report and answer questions that arise in your preliminary review. This meeting would include all interested parties ; all of the organizations that submitted 

public comments on the API petition would be invited to attend. We would allow 25 

days from that meeting for written comments to be submitted to EPA (i .e ., until January 

17, 1997). Those comments could include the issues you raised in your November 13 

letter, if they remain of concern, and any additional issues that arise from review of 

DOE's report. EPA would study the submissions from all of the commenters, incorporate 

them into its response, and attempt to complete its response within 45 days, by March 

3, 1997. 

1 

~- 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C . 20460 

Recycled/Recyclable . Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (40~o Postconsurner) 
-2-

Our concern is that this option extends the decision beyond the end of 1996; 

however, you indicated that it may be preferable as it would permit member companies 

an opportunity to comment on DOE's analysis prior to a final decision by EPA on the 

API petition. 

I look forward to hearing from you on this issue. Please respond in writing. 

Sincerely, 

Charles N. Freed 

Director 

Fuels and Energy Division 

cc : Barry McNutt, DOE
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 12

- 00569

- CV
MAE FIELDS AND THOMAS BETTS, ET AL.

v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICAN AND WARDEN ORLANDO PEREZ

On a ppeal from the 197th District Court of Willacy County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2011

- CV

- 0264

- A

JUDGM ENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further o rder this decision certified below for observance. May 8, 2014.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 27, 2009 

d0120 

Order 

 

January 27, 2009 

136235(86) 

 

PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 136235 

 COA: 271764 

Macomb CC: 2005-000694-AR 

39th District Court: 04-242199 

EDWARD STROSS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 

10, 2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order 

was entered erroneously. 

 KELLY, C.J., would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would deny 

leave to appeal.
# C_2008272EN.01000501.xml

| 25.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/5

---

Designation of the judge to replace the President of the Tribunal for the purpose of dealing with applications for interim measures

(2008/C 272/05)

On 30 September 2008, in accordance with Article 103(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the Tribunal decided that, for the period from 1 October 2008 to 30 September 2009, Judge Kanninen, President of the Second Chamber, will replace the President of the Tribunal for the purpose of dealing with applications for interim measures in the event of the President's absence or his being prevented from attending.

---