alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 33.1

Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria



|1. | Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Asserting Party) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it under paragraph
(d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Reporting Period). The transactions covered by this report include privately and publicly issued auto loan asset-backed securities
transactions issued since 2006 for which the Asserting Party acted as servicer involving auto loans (the Platform).
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The Asserting Party used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the applicable servicing criteria
except for the following criteria which the Asserting Party determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Asserting Party with respect to the Platform: 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122 (d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(ix),
1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), and 1122(d)(4)(xiii).
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | The Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2011 and for the Reporting Period with
respect to the Platform taken as a whole.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | Deloitte & Touche LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Asserting Partys assessment of compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2011 and for the Reporting Period.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

March 16, 2011

SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Jason Kulas        
|Name:  |  | Jason Kulas            
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
# Official Journal C 5A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.005.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 5A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5610 January 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.005.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 5A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5610 January 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| 2013/C 005A/01 | Corrigendum to vacancy notice ECA/2012/74 — Director (function group AD, grade 14/15) — Secretariat-General — Translation Directorate (OJ C 369 A, 29.11.2012) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2013/C 005A/01

Corrigendum to vacancy notice ECA/2012/74 — Director (function group AD, grade 14/15) — Secretariat-General — Translation Directorate (OJ C 369 A, 29.11.2012)

(OJ C 369 A, 29.11.2012)

1

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |

5

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

Corrigenda

| 10.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 5/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 5/1

---

Corrigendum to vacancy notice ECA/2012/74 — Director (function group AD, grade 14/15) — Secretariat-General — Translation Directorate

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 369 A of 29 November 2012
  )

(2013/C 5 A/01)

The Court of Auditors has decided to publish vacancy notice ECA/2012/74 in the 23 official languages of the European Union.

The deadline for applications has therefore been extended.

The final date for submitting applications is 1 February 2013 at midnight.

Candidates who have already applied are not required to resubmit an application.

---
No. 48025.

#### Protest 92984-K of Jacob Jehuda (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J,

Prom an examination of the record consisting of the official papers nothing was disclosed that would warrant the court in disturbing the finding of the collector, which was held presumptively correct. The protest was therefore overruled.
(Reap. Dec. 9274)

#### North American Plywood Corp. et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 708133, etc.

(Decided December 18, 1958)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have stipulated and agreed in. these cases as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto that the merchandise involved in the Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof consists of plywood exported from Finland in the years 1955 and 1956 and that the merchandise is properly dutiable on the basis of the foreign market value as defined in Section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers *599in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for home consumption including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the appraised unit values less 4% packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher export value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof and that the stipulation is limited to the invoices where the merchandise was advanced in value and appraised on the basis of the home market value; that with respect to invoices embraced in such appeals where appraisement was made on the basis of the entered invoice unit values said appeals are herewith abandoned with respect to such invoices.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeals to Re-appraisement referred to herein may be submitted on this stipulation.

Upon the agreed facts, I find that foreign value, as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is the proper basis of valuation for the merchandise involved in the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the schedule attached to this decision, and that such value in each case was the appraised value, less 4 per centum, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
# Campaign finance data

See how candidates and committees raise and spend money in federal elections. This financial data helps voters make informed decisions.

## Compare candidates

##  

Icon of a graphRaising »
Discover which candidates are raising the most

Icon of a graphSpending »
Discover which candidates are spending the most

## Look up candidate and committee profiles

Examples: Obama for America; C00431445; Bush, George W.; P00003335; or enter an image number for a filing.

#### Top raising candidates running in 2024:

            - BIDEN, JOSEPH R JR [DEM] | US-President
            - HARRIS, KAMALA [DEM] | US-President
            - TRUMP, DONALD J. [REP] | US-President

## Find contributions from specific individuals

#### Possible uses of this data:

            - All contributions over $2,000
            - All contributions in this year
            - Browse all and apply custom filters

## Browse data

Icon of a piggy bank              Raising            

Icon of representing spending              Spending            

Icon of a candidate              Candidates            

Icon of a committee              Committees            

Icon of filed papers              Filings and reports            

Icon of an open hand with a dollar symbol              Loans and debts            

Icon of bulk data              Bulk data and other sources            

Icon representing external pages              External data sources
(Reap. Dec. 9339)

#### Finwood Industries, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 433-H, etc.

(Decided March 6, 1959)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the schedule attached hereto are from findings of value by the appraiser as to certain plywood exported from Finland in the years 1955 and 1956.

*552The appeals have been submitted for decision upon stipulation of ’counsel limiting the appeals to the merchandise which was advanced in^value by the appraiser and appraised on the basis of home market value. Upon the basis of the stipulated facts, I find, as to such merchandise, that foreign value, as defined in section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of such merchandise, and that such value, in each instance, is the appraised unit value, less 4 per centum, packed.

As to the merchandise which was appraised on the basis of the entered invoice unit values, the appeals for reappraisement, having been abandoned, are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
82° 00'W

82° 00'W

81° 30'W

81° 30'W

81° 00'W

81° 00'W

80° 30'W

80° 30'W

80° 00'W

80° 00'W

79° 30'W

79° 30'W

79° 00'W

79° 00'W

41° 30'N

42° 00'N

42° 30'N

10

8

9

9

10

11 8 10 7 7

7

7 7 8

7

7

6

6

6 7 7 8

10 10 9 10

7 8 56 3

2

4

66

34 8 5 11

8 12 10 10 5 8-14 9 14 13

108

9

7

7

14

14

16

18

17

16

15 13

11

11

12

11

10

12

8

18

12

16

27

22

131618 16

8

16

-cut shore zone of the perimeter of Lake Erie and its islands. The outer perimeter is shown as a green line. Spot depths to the lower limits of the steep shore zone are shown as red numerals.
A90A0148.

#### PIEDMONT PROPERTIES, INC. et al. v. SIMS et al.

(393 SE2d 496)

Decided April 12, 1990.

*F. Carter Tate,*for appellants.

*Glass, McCullough, Sherrill & Harrold, Terrence McQuade, Robert S. Jones, James Will, Jr.,*for appellees.

Cooper, Judge.

This case arises from a dispute about the validity of a contract for the sale of real property. Appellants sued appellees for specific performance or, in the alternative, damages. This appeal follows the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to appellees.

We first consider whether we have jurisdiction to consider this matter. “An action seeking specific performance seeks equitable relief [cits.], and an appeal from a judgment rendered pursuant to a request for equitable relief is within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. [Cits.]” *Lemke v. Southern Farm &c. Ins. Co.,*182 Ga. App. 700 (356 SE2d 739) (1987). This appeal from a judgment rendered pursuant to a request for equitable relief is within the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction. 1983 Ga. Const., Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (2).

*Case transferred to Supreme Court.*

*Banke, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.*
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with this quarterly report of Torotel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dale H. Sizemore, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Dale H. Sizemore, Jr. |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   |
|                           |   |
| Dale H. Sizemore, Jr.     |   |
| Chief Executive Officer        |   |
| December 15, 2010         |   |

 

----
Exhibit 33.11



|     |  |  |  |                                                               
|---- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  | 303 E Wacker Drive, Suite 900
Chicago, IL 60601 (312)
233-6440

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONS REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2015, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank(the
Servicer).

National Tax Search, LLC (NTS) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2015 and for the period
from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the CFR). NTS has used the
servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (1)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii),
1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of
the Servicer using NTSs TaxQ system (the Platform Transactions).

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
Transactions taken as a whole.

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the
assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer
|                                               
|/s/ Lori D. Eshoo                              
|Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO                   
|January 18, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 221 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 221

 Supporting the goals and ideals of ``National Campus Safety Awareness 
                                Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 28, 2005

  Mr. Feingold (for himself and Mr. Specter) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                           September 14, 2005

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Supporting the goals and ideals of ``National Campus Safety Awareness 
                                Month''.

Whereas college and university campuses are subject to criminal threats both 
        from within and outside their borders;
Whereas under the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus 
        Crime Statistics Act a total of 86 homicides, 7,648 sex offenses, 9,649 
        aggravated assaults, and 3,590 arsons were reported on-campus from 2000 
        to 2002;
Whereas between \1/5\ and \1/4\ of female students become the victim of a 
        completed or attempted rape, usually by someone they know, during their 
        college careers;
Whereas each year more than 70,000 students between the ages of 18 and 24 are 
        victims of alcohol-related sexual assault;
Whereas each year more than 600,000 students between the ages of 18 and 24 are 
        assaulted by another student who has been drinking;
Whereas 1,400 college students between the ages of 18 and 24 die each year from 
        alcohol-related unintentional injuries, including motor vehicle crashes;
Whereas each year there is approximately $2.8 million dollars worth of property 
        damage from fires on-campus;
Whereas Security On Campus, Inc., a national group dedicated to promoting safety 
        and security on college and university campuses, and the University of 
        Wisconsin-Green Bay Student Government Association have designated 
        September 2005 as National Campus Safety Awareness Month; and
Whereas the designation of National Campus Safety Awareness Month provides an 
        opportunity for colleges and universities to inform students about 
        existing campus crime trends, campus security policies, crime prevention 
        techniques, fire safety, and alcohol and other drug education, 
        prevention, and treatment programs: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate supports the goals and ideals of 
``National Campus Safety Awareness Month''.
                                 <all>
```
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 235 

To permit the solicitation of donations in Senate buildings for the relief 

of victims of Hurricane Katrina. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2005 

Mr. LOTT (for himself, Mr. DODD, Mr. COCHRAN, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. 

VITTER, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. FRIST, Mr. REID, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. KOHL, Mr. KYL, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. GREGG, Mr. 

KENNEDY, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. MARTINEZ, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. ENZI, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. CARPER, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. CORZINE, Mr. REED, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. 

DEWINE, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. DAYTON, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. THUNE, 

Mr. ALLEN, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. COBURN, Mr. BURR, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. 

PRYOR, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. 

STEVENS, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. TALENT, Mr. KERRY, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. 

HARKIN, Mr. COLEMAN, Mrs. DOLE, and Ms. CANTWELL) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To permit the solicitation of donations in Senate buildings 

for the relief of victims of Hurricane Katrina. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SOLICITATION FOR HURRICANE KATRINA RE3 LIEF. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of the rules or 

5 regulations of the Senate— 
2 

•SRES 235 ATS

1 (1) a Senator or employee of the Senate may 

2 solicit another Senator or employee of the Senate 

3 within Senate buildings for nonmonetary donations 

4 for the relief of victims of Hurricane Katrina; and 

5 (2) a Senator or employee of the Senate may 

6 work with a nonprofit organization with respect to 

7 the delivery of donations described in paragraph (1). 

Æ
IIA 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 21 

Recognizing Commodore John Barry as the first flag officer of the United 

States Navy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 26, 2005 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself, Mr. CORZINE, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. SCHUMER, 

and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

JOINT RESOLUTION

Recognizing Commodore John Barry as the first flag officer 

of the United States Navy.

Whereas John Barry, American merchant marine captain and 

native of County Wexford, Ireland, volunteered his services to the Continental Navy during the American War 

for Independence and was assigned by the Continental 

Congress as captain of the Lexington, taking command 

of that vessel on March 14, 1776, and later participating 

in the victorious Trenton campaign; 

Whereas the quality and effectiveness of Captain John Barry’s service to the American war effort was recognized 

not only by George Washington but also by the enemies 

of the new Nation; 
2

•SJ 21 IS

Whereas Captain John Barry rejected British General Lord 

Howe’s flattering offer to desert Washington and the patriot cause, stating: ‘‘Not the value and command of the 

whole British fleet can lure me from the cause of my 

country.’’; 

Whereas Captain John Barry, while in command of the frigate Alliance, successfully transported French gold to 

America to help finance the American War for Independence and also won numerous victories at sea; 

Whereas when the First Congress, acting under the new Constitution of the United States, authorized the raising and 

construction of the United States Navy, it was to Captain 

John Barry that President George Washington turned to 

build and lead the new Nation’s infant Navy, the successor to the Continental Navy of the War for Independence; 

Whereas Captain John Barry supervised the building of his 

flagship, the U.S.S. United States; 

Whereas on February 22, 1797, President Washington personally conferred upon Captain John Barry, by and with 

the advice and consent of the Senate, the rank of Captain, with ‘‘Commission No. 1’’, United States Navy, 

dated June 7, 1794; 

Whereas John Barry served as the senior officer of the 

United States Navy, with the title of ‘‘Commodore’’ (in 

official correspondence), under Presidents Washington, 

John Adams, and Jefferson; 

Whereas as commander of the first United States naval 

squadron under the Constitution of the United States, 

which included the U.S.S. Constitution (‘‘Old Ironsides’’), 
3

•SJ 21 IS

John Barry was a Commodore, with the right to fly a 

broad pendant, which made him a flag officer; and 

Whereas in this sense it can be said that Commodore John 

Barry was the first flag officer of the United States 

Navy: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Commodore John Barry is recognized, and is hereby 

4 honored, as the first flag officer of the United States 

5 Navy.

Æ