Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment i

Table of Contents

 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................... IV 

1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1

2.0 WYANET CONNECTION AND EOLA MAIN LINE IMPROVEMENTS ........................ 

 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ............................................................................ 3

2.1 PURPOSE AND NEED ...................................................................................................... 3

2.1.1 Background on Current Rail Operations ................................................................. 4

2.1.2 Purpose ................................................................................................................... 6

2.1.3 Need for the Eola Main Line Improvements ............................................................ 7

2.1.4 Proposed Eola Main Line Improvements ................................................................ 8

2.2 ALTERNATIVES .............................................................................................................. 9

2.2.1 Eola Main Line Improvements ................................................................................. 9

2.2.2 Wyanet Connection ................................................................................................. 9

2.3 TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................................... 10

2.3.1 Affected Environment ............................................................................................ 10

2.3.2 No-Build Alternative .............................................................................................. 11

2.3.3 Preferred Alternative - Two Round-trip Trains per Day ......................................... 12

2.3.4 Preferred Alternative - Five Round-trip Trains per Day ......................................... 12

2.4 NOISE AND VIBRATION ................................................................................................. 13

2.4.1 Noise Assessment ................................................................................................ 13

2.4.2 Ground-borne Vibration Assessment .................................................................... 15

2.5 AIR QUALITY ............................................................................................................... 17

2.6 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS .............................................................................................. 20

2.6.1 Eola Main Line Improvements ............................................................................... 20

2.6.2 Wyanet Connection ............................................................................................... 21

2.6.3 No-Build Alternative .............................................................................................. 23

2.6.4 Preferred Alternative – Two Round-trip Trains per Day ........................................ 24

2.6.5 Preferred Alternative – Five Round-trip Trains per Day ........................................ 24

2.7 CULTURAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................... 25

2.7.1 No-Build Alternative .............................................................................................. 25

2.7.2 Preferred Alternative – Two Round-trip Trains per Day ........................................ 26

2.7.3 Preferred Alternative – Five Round-trip Trains per Day ........................................ 26

2.8 PARKS AND NATURAL AREAS ........................................................................................ 26

2.8.1 Eola Main Line Improvements ............................................................................... 26

2.8.2 Wyanet Connection ............................................................................................... 27

2.8.3 No-Build Alternative .............................................................................................. 27

2.8.4 Preferred Alternative - Two Round-trip Trains per Day ......................................... 28

2.8.5 Preferred Alternative - Five Round-trip Trains per Day ......................................... 28
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

ii Service Level Environmental Assessment

2.9 SECTION 4(F)RESOURCES ........................................................................................... 29

2.9.1 No-Build Alternative .............................................................................................. 30

2.9.2 Preferred Alternative - Two Round-trip Trains per Day ......................................... 30

2.9.3 Preferred Alternative - Five Round-trip Trains per Day ......................................... 32

2.10 WATERWAYS (STREAM RELOCATION) ........................................................................... 32

2.10.1 No-Build Alternative .............................................................................................. 33

2.10.2 Preferred Alternative - Two Round-trip Trains per Day ......................................... 33

2.10.3 Preferred Alternative - Five Round-trip Trains per Day ......................................... 35

2.11 WETLANDS ................................................................................................................. 35

2.11.1 No-Build Alternative .............................................................................................. 36

2.11.2 Preferred Alternative - Two Round-trip Trains per Day ......................................... 36

2.11.3 Preferred Alternative - Five Round-trip Trains per Day ......................................... 37

2.12 WATER QUALITY ......................................................................................................... 37

2.12.1 No-Build Alternative .............................................................................................. 39

2.12.2 Preferred Alternative - Two Round-trip Trains per Day ......................................... 40

2.12.3 Five Round-trip Trains per Day ............................................................................. 41

2.13 FLOODPLAINS.............................................................................................................. 41

2.13.1 No-Build Alternative .............................................................................................. 42

2.13.2 Preferred Alternative - Two Round-trip Trains per Day ......................................... 42

2.13.3 Preferred Alternative - Five Round-Trip Trains per Day ........................................ 44

2.14 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES ..................................................................... 44

2.14.1 Two Round-Trip Trains per Day ............................................................................ 45

2.14.2 Five Round-Trip Trains per Day ............................................................................ 46

2.15 CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS ............................................................................................. 47

2.15.1 No-Build Alternative .............................................................................................. 47

2.15.2 Preferred Alternative - Two Round-trip Trains per Day ......................................... 47

2.15.3 Preferred Alternative - Five Round-trip Trains per Day ......................................... 49

2.16 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ................................................................................................. 49

3.0 COMMENTS AND COORDINATION ....................................................................... 52

3.1 PUBLIC MEETING ......................................................................................................... 52

3.2 PUBLIC COMMENTS ..................................................................................................... 52

3.3 COMMENT RESPONSES ................................................................................................ 53

3.4 AGENCY COORDINATION .............................................................................................. 53

4.0 NEXT STEPS ............................................................................................................ 55

4.1 PROJECT SECTIONS .................................................................................................... 55

4.2 ADDITIONAL STUDIES ................................................................................................... 57

5.0 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 58
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment iii

List of Tables 

Table 2.4-1 Summary ofTraffic Conditions ............................................................................................. 14

Table 2.4-2 Impact Threshold Contour Distances .................................................................................... 15

Table 2.4-3 Distances to Category 2 Ground-borne Vibration Impacts .................................................... 16

Table 2.11-1 Wetlands within Survey Limits .............................................................................................. 35

Table 2.12-1 2010 Illinois EPA 303(d) List – Specific Assessment information for Fox River .................... 38

Table 2.12-2 2010 Illinois EPA 303(d) List – Specific Assessment Information for Pond Creek ................ 39

Table 2.14-1 Federally Listed or Candidates for Listing Threatened and Endangered Species within 

the Eola Main Line Improvements Section of the Project Area ............................................. 45

Table 3.2-1 Comments by Media Type .................................................................................................... 52

Table 3.2-2 Comments by Topic .............................................................................................................. 53

Table 3.4-1 Agency Coordination ............................................................................................................. 54

List of Charts 

Chart 2.4-1 FTA Noise Impact Criteria ..................................................................................................... 14 

Figures 

Figure 1-1 Project Location 

Figure 1-2 Eola Main Line Improvements Section of the Project Area 

Figure 1-3 Wyanet Connection Section of the Project Area 

Figure 2.1-1 Regional Rail Related to Eola Main Line Improvements 

Figure 2.1-2 Eola Main Line Improvements Vicinity 

Figure 2.4-1 Vibration and Noise Contours and Impacts 

Figure 2.6-1 Eola Main Line Improvements Environmental Constraints 

Figure 2.6-1 Wyanet Connection Environmental Constraints 

Attachments 

Attachment 1 Eola Main Line Improvements PESA 

Attachment 2 Wyanet Connection PESA 

Attachment 3 Eola Main Line Improvements Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum 

Attachment 4 Wyanet Connection Archaeological Survey Short Report 

Attachment 5 Eola Main Line Improvements Aquatic/Stream Impact Analysis Conceptual Mitigation 

Technical Memorandum 

Attachment 6 Wyanet Connection Aquatic/Stream Impact analysis Conceptual Mitigation Technical 

Memorandum 

Attachment 7 Eola Main Line Improvements Wetland Delineation Report 

Attachment 8 Wyanet Connection Wetland Delineation Report 

Attachment 9 Agency Comment Letters 

Attachment 10 Comments and Responses 

Attachment 11 Illinois Natural History Survey, Preliminary Prairie Report (pending) 

 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

iv Service Level Environmental Assessment

Acronyms and Abbreviations 

AST aboveground storage tank 

BGEPA Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act 

BMP best management practice 

BNSF BNSF Railway Company 

CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Information System 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

CN Canadian National Railway Corporation 

CO carbon monoxide, county 

CO2 carbon dioxide 

CSXT CSX Transportation Company 

CWA Clean Water Act 

dBA A-weighted decibels 

EA Environmental Assessment 

EcoCAT Ecological Compliance Assessment Tool 

EJ&E Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway 

EO Executive Order 

EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency 

EPA FRS EPA Federal Registry System 

ERNS Emergency Response Notification System 

ESA U.S. Endangered Species Act 

et seq. and the following 

FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency 

FHWA U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway 

Administration 

FINDS Facility Index System 

FR Federal Register 

FRA U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad 

Administration 

FTA U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit 

Administration 

GBV ground-borne vibration 

GHG (human-generated) greenhouse gas 

HC hydrocarbons 

HDR HDR Engineering, Inc. 

HMIRS Hazardous Materials Incident Report System 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment v

HSIPR High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail 

HUC hydrologic unit code 

IA Iowa 

IAIS Iowa Interstate Railroad 

IDNR Illinois Department of Natural Resources 

IL Illinois 

ILCS Illinois Compiled Statutes 

Illinois DOT Illinois Department of Transportation 

Illinois EPA Illinois Environmental Protection Agency 

INAI Illinois Natural Areas Inventory 

INHS Illinois Natural History Survey 

Iowa DOT Iowa Department of Transportation 

ISGS Illinois State Geological Survey 

Ldn day-night noise level 

LOC limits of construction 

LUST leaking underground storage tank 

MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act 

MetroLINK Rock Island County Metropolitan Mass Transit 

District 

MP milepost 

Mph miles per hour 

MWRRI Midwest Regional Rail Initiative 

NEPA National Environmental Policy Act 

NOx nitrogen oxides 

NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 

NRHP National Register of Historic Places 

NWI National Wetlands Inventory 

O3 ozone 

PCB polychlorinated biphenyl 

PEM palustrine forested 

PEMF palustrine, emergent, semi permanently flooded 

PESA Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment 

PFO palustrine emergent 

PHMSA U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and 

Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 

PM-2.5 particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers in 

diameter 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

vi Service Level Environmental Assessment

PM-10 particulate matter less than 10 micrometers in 

diameter 

Preferred Alternative Route A – Amtrak-BNSF-IAIS 

Project reestablishment of passenger rail service between 

Chicago, Illinois, and Iowa City, Iowa 

RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act 

ROW right-of-way 

RTC Rail Traffic Controller 

Section 4(f) Section 4(f) of the U.S. Department of Transportation 

Act of 1966 

Section 106 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act 

of 1996, as amended 

Section 404 Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, as amended 

SHPO State Historic Preservation Office 

SHWS State Hazardous Waste Sites 

SO2 sulfur dioxide 

SRP State Remediation Program 

TPD trains per day 

TSS total suspended solids 

USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 

USAG-RIA U.S. Army Garrison-Rock Island Arsenal 

USC United States Code 

USDOT U.S. Department of Transportation 

USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 

UST underground storage tank 

VdB vibration decibels 

VOC volatile organic compound 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION 

In September 2009, the Illinois Department of Transportation (Illinois DOT) and the 

Iowa Department of Transportation (Iowa DOT) published an Environmental Assessment 

(EA) evaluating the service level (tier 1) issues for the reestablishment of intercity 

passenger rail service between Chicago, Illinois, and Iowa City, Iowa (the Project) 

(Figure 1-1, Project Location, located at the end of this document). The September 2009 

Service Level EA was submitted to the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) 

Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) in support of a High Speed Intercity Passenger 

Rail (HSIPR) grant application submitted by Illinois DOT and Iowa DOT. FRA received 

a very large number of HSIPR grant applications, and unfortunately, because of funding 

constraints, FRA was not able to fund the majority of the grant applications, including the 

Chicago to Iowa City Service grant application. As part of the Illinois DOT and Iowa 

DOT 2010 HSIPR Grant application for the Chicago to Iowa City Service, FRA 

requested additional analysis of the potential impacts associated with construction and 

operation of the Eola Main Line Improvements and the Wyanet Connection to 

supplement the September 2009 Service Level EA. 

This document provides supplemental information to the September 2009 Service Level 

EA as well as additional analysis of the potential impacts of Eola Main Line 

Improvements and the Wyanet Connection. In addition, this document includes errata to 

the September 2009 Service Level EA and updates some of the information in the 

September 2009 Service Level EA. 

The September 2009 Service Level EA identified Route A as the Preferred Alternative 

for reestablishing passenger rail service between Chicago and Iowa City. Route A would 

use the track of three carriers: 1.6 miles on Amtrak, 115.3 miles on BNSF Railway 

Company (formerly known as the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad [BNSF]), 

and 102.3 miles on Iowa Interstate Railroad (IAIS). The Eola Main Line Improvements1

were discussed in the September 2009 EA as a contributor to the cumulative impacts, not 

as a Project component: 

Illinois: Improvements Proposed for the BNSF Eola Yard in Aurora – 

Improvements are proposed to improve the flow of train traffic on the 

BNSF line from Chicago to Aurora. This triple-track line is currently used 

for BNSF freight trains, Metra commuter trains, and Amtrak passenger 

trains. Metra commuter trains depart and arrive at the Hill Yard/Aurora 

Transportation Center using two lead tracks, which join the double-track 

BNSF main lines at the west end of Eola Yard. Departing and arriving 

Metra trains block the main BNSF lines, delaying BNSF and Amtrak 

trains. The Hill Yard lead track would be extended to the east end of Eola 

 

1

 Several different names have been used for the set of track improvements envisioned for the BNSF rail 

line near Aurora, Illinois. The September 2009 Service Level EA identified these improvements as 

“Improvements Proposed for the BNSF Eola Yard in Aurora.” Because the improvements are more 

closely connected with the BNSF’s Chicago Subdivision main line that runs through Eola Yard, this 

Supplemental Information identifies the improvements as the “Eola Main Line Improvements.” 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

2 Service Level Environmental Assessment

Yard, freeing up one of the BNSF main lines. Two yard lines would be 

extended to ensure that trains in the Eola Yard can clear the BNSF line. 

This would allow BNSF and Amtrak trains to operate on this BNSF main 

line, reducing delays through this congested area. Because of the high 

number of freight, commuter, and intercity passenger trains currently 

operating on the BNSF rail line between Chicago and Aurora, the 

improvements to the BNSF Eola Yard in Aurora are needed before the 

service to Iowa City could commence. A separate HSIPR grant application 

was submitted by Illinois DOT on August 24, 2009, for funds to pursue 

the BNSF Eola Main Line Improvements. These improvements, which are 

one part of a suite of Chicago Terminal improvements, are needed to 

reduce congestion and improve the on-time performance of the current 

passenger trains as well as accommodate the new Chicago to Iowa City 

service. Because the Eola Main Line Improvements have independent 

utility and will be pursued irrespective of the Chicago to Iowa City 

service, the Eola Main Line Improvements will be the subject of a separate 

[National Environmental Policy Act] NEPA evaluation (State of Illinois, 

August 24, 2009). 

– September 2009 Service Level EA, page 3-81 

The Chicago Terminal Improvements project was not funded and is not advancing at this 

time. Because the improvements to the main line service through Eola Yard are no longer 

being completed through the Chicago Terminal Improvements project, but are a 

necessary component to provide passenger rail service from Chicago to Iowa City, the 

Eola Main Line Improvements are now considered a component of the Chicago to Iowa 

City Project (Figure 1-2, Eola Main Line Improvements Section of the Project Area). The 

intent of this supplemental information is to address the potential impacts resulting from 

the main line improvements when considered as part of the Chicago to Iowa City Project. 

Route A would require a new connection between the BNSF and the IAIS rail lines; the 

connection would be at the location where the two rail lines cross, approximately 1 mile 

southwest of Wyanet, Illinois as shown in Figure 1-3, Wyanet Connection Section of the 

Project Area. The Wyanet Connection would consist of approximately 4,000 feet of new, 

single-track rail line located in the northwest quadrant of the grade-separated crossing of 

the BNSF and IAIS rail lines. The new connection would require approximately 7 acres 

of new railroad right-of-way (ROW) and would accommodate a train speed of 

approximately 50 miles per hour (mph). 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 3

2.0 WYANET CONNECTION AND EOLA MAIN LINE 

IMPROVEMENTS SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 

This supplemental information focuses primarily on those resources that may be affected 

by construction and operation of the Wyanet Connection and Eola Main Line 

Improvements. In accordance with 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1502.21, this 

supplemental information hereby incorporates by reference all information that is 

included in the September 2009 Service Level EA and is not changing or does not require 

additional analysis (such as the discussion of indirect and cumulative impacts). 

Section 2.1, Purpose and Need, and Section 2.2, Alternatives, supplement the discussion 

presented in the September 2009 Service Level EA with information on the Eola Main 

Line Improvements. Where applicable, this document also includes updated information 

and errata to the September 2009 Service Level EA. The following list identifies the 

specific resource topics addressed and their respective sections in this document: 

• Transportation (Section 2.3) 

• Noise and Vibration (Section 2.4) 

• Air Quality (Section 2.5) 

• Hazardous Materials (Section 2.6) 

• Cultural Resources (Section 2.7) 

• Parks and Natural Areas (Section 2.8) 

• Section 4(f) Properties (Section 2.9) 

• Waterways (Stream Relocation) (Section 2.10) 

• Wetlands (Section 2.11) 

• Water Quality (Section 2.12) 

• Floodplains (Section 2.13) 

• Threatened and Endangered Species (Section 2.14) 

• Construction Impacts (Section 2.15) 

This document focuses on the No-Build Alternative and the Preferred Alternative 

(Route A – Amtrak,-BNSF-IAIS) identified in the September 2009 Service Level EA. 

Both the two round-trip trains per day (TPD) and the five round-trip TPD scenarios are 

discussed. The Route B Alternative (Amtrak-Canadian National Railway Corporation 

[CN]-Metra/Rock Island District-CSX Transportation Company [CSXT]-IAIS) identified 

in the September 2009 Service Level EA is not discussed because the Eola Main Line 

Improvements and the Wyanet Connection are not part of that alternative. Section 2.15 

summarizes impacts identified for individual resources affected by the Wyanet 

Connection and Eola Main Line Improvements. Section 3.0 summarizes additional 

comments received and agency coordination conducted since publication of the 

September 2009 Service Level EA. Section 4.0 outlines the next steps in the NEPA 

process for the Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service. 

2.1 PURPOSE AND NEED

This section supplements the September 2009 Service Level EA purpose and need 

statement with information on the Eola Main Line Improvements only. A full discussion 

of the purpose of and need for the related Wyanet Connection was included in the 

September 2009 Service Level EA. 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

4 Service Level Environmental Assessment

As discussed in Section 1.0, Introduction, the Eola Main Line Improvements are 

necessary to reestablish passenger service between Chicago and Iowa City. The following 

sections provide background information on current rail operations between Chicago, 

Eola, and Wyanet, Illinois; state the purpose of and need for this element of the Project; 

and explain the proposed Main Line Improvements at Eola.2

2.1.1 Background on Current Rail Operations 

BNSF serves Chicago with three main lines converging on the city from the west. Two of 

the main lines, the single-track Aurora Subdivision from the Pacific Northwest and the 

double-track Mendota Subdivision from the central western states, converge at 

Montgomery, just west of Aurora, Illinois, and west of the location of the proposed Eola 

Main Line Improvements. At Montgomery, the Mendota and Aurora Subdivisions 

combine as the Chicago Subdivision (see Figure 2.1-1, Regional Rail Related to the Eola 

Main Line Improvements). The triple-track Chicago Subdivision runs 36 miles from the 

West Eola Plant3 in Aurora through Eola Yard and Chicago’s western suburbs, to 

Chicago’s Union Station. At the West Eola Plant, the two “Hill Yard” signalized lead 

tracks4 diverge from the Chicago Subdivision main lines and carry Metra commuter trains 

to and from the Aurora Transportation Center in Aurora (see Figure 2.1-2, Eola Main 

Line Improvements Vicinity). 

BNSF freight trains, which number approximately 50 per day at present, move east and 

west across the Chicago Subdivision, passing through Eola at all times of the day and 

night. BNSF’s Chicago Subdivision, together with the Aurora and Mendota subdivisions, 

form a critical transportation artery for freight movement in North America. Principal 

commodities hauled on these rail lines are coal destined for Midwest power plants, 

containerized consumer goods and auto parts of both international and domestic origins, 

grain and animal feed for domestic and international consumption, construction materials, 

finished autos, and industrial materials. BNSF has no alternative route for this freight 

traffic. The freight traffic carried on the three subdivisions is either destined to or 

originates in the Chicago area, or it must pass through Chicago between points as 

dispersed as the Upper Ohio Valley to the east, the intermountain states to the west, and 

the Pacific Coast. 

Amtrak daily long-distance and regional intercity passenger trains, presently eight per 

day (or four round trips), use the Chicago Subdivision to Aurora. Amtrak trains Nos. 3 

and 4, the Southwest Chief, use the Mendota Subdivision en route to Kansas City, 

Missouri, and Los Angeles, California. Amtrak trains Nos. 5 and 6, the California 

Zephyr, use the Mendota Subdivision en route to Denver, Colorado, and Oakland, 

 

2

 In reality, there is no town called Eola, Illinois. Eola is a railroad location name and has been said to be 

an acronym for End of Line Aurora. This Supplemental Information discusses proposed railroad 

infrastructure improvements from the West Eola Plant (MP 35.3 on BNSF’s Chicago Subdivision) 

through Eola Yard to the Eola Plant (MP 33.4 on BNSF’s Chicago Subdivision). 

3

 The West Eola Plant includes the West Eola interlocking. An interlocking is an arrangement of 

interconnected signal equipment that enables train movements to succeed each other in safe, proper 

sequence. It may be operated manually or automatically. 

4

 Hill Yard is located approximately 1.5 miles west of Eola Yard. Two tracks, located north of the 

Chicago subdivision tracks, lead into Hill Yard. 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 5

California. Four Illinois Service (regional intercity passenger) trains, 380 through 383, 

use the Mendota Subdivision to Galesburg, Illinois. 

Metra commuter trains, approximately 1105 TPD on weekdays (both revenue and 

nonrevenue), use the Chicago Subdivision from Chicago Union Station to Eola, and use 

the Hill Yard lead tracks to Aurora Transportation Center, 3 miles west of Eola. This 

commuter service is Metra’s densest, carrying approximately 63,200 passengers daily, or 

about 20 percent of all of Metra’s ridership. The volume of Metra passenger trains peaks 

in the inbound (toward Chicago) direction between 6 a.m. and 9 a.m. and in the outbound 

(toward Aurora) direction between 4 p.m. and 7 p.m. In addition, Metra provides midday 

and late evening service as well as weekend and holiday service. 

At Eola, the Hill Yard lead tracks converge with the main tracks of the Chicago 

subdivision in a series of signalized high-speed crossover tracks enabling trains to access 

the correct track to make station stops, change routes, meet trains moving in the opposite 

direction, and overtake trains that are slowing down to change tracks or to leave the main 

tracks. Crossover tracks at the West Eola Plant (Milepost [MP] 35.3) and at the Eola 

Plant (MP 33.4) are used to sort train traffic onto the appropriate main tracks for optimal 

schedule adherence for both passenger and freight trains. However, when Metra 

passenger trains depart from the Hill Yard lead, they block all the main line tracks as they 

cross-over from the north side of the main lines to the south side of the main lines – 

requiring all other approaching train traffic to slow or stop until the Metra train has 

cleared the interlocking plant. 

Eola Yard, located between the West Eola Plant and the Eola Plant, consists of two 

separated yards: one to the north of the Chicago Subdivision main tracks, called the 

“West Yard”; and one to the south, called the “East Yard.” These two yards operate as 

one. The West Yard assembles carload freight from local customers in Chicago for 

forwarding several times a day on non-unit trains6 to BNSF’s classification yard at 

Galesburg. The East Yard disassembles non-unit trains containing local cars from 

through-trains arriving from the west. In general, Eola Yard marshals (classifies) both 

eastbound and westbound cars for movement either east to Chicago and beyond or west 

to points such as Denver, Colorado; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Seattle, Washington; and 

Portland, Oregon. 

At Eola Yard, and on the main tracks between the two halves of Eola Yard, BNSF also 

stages7 unit trains and general manifest trains8 that are fully blocked9 and ready for 

 

5

 Not all of the 110 Metra commuter trains per day originate or terminate at the Aurora Transportation 

Center. Some of the Metra trains terminate or originate at intermediate stations on the Chicago 

Subdivision. 

6

 Unit trains consist entirely of cars typically of the same commodity shipped from the same origin to the 

same destination, without being split up or stored en route. To meet the needs of shippers and receivers, 

unit trains are generally quite long and cannot readily be broken-up into smaller sections. 

7

 Train staging is the process of preparing (classifying and blocking) and storing trains off the main line 

until they are ready for advancement to the train’s ultimate destination. 

8

 General manifest trains are composed of mixed railcars (such as boxcars and tank cars) hauling many 

different cargoes. 

9

 Blocking rail cars is the process of grouping rail cars in blocks of cars with a similar destination. 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

6 Service Level Environmental Assessment

interchange10 for CN, the Belt Railway of Chicago, and the Western Avenue Corridor 

when these trains cannot be accepted by these connections at the time they arrive at Eola. 

At Eola, connection tracks diverge from the Chicago Subdivision to CN’s former Elgin, 

Joliet & Eastern (EJ&E) rail line. BNSF exchanges several trains daily with CN on these 

connecting tracks. 

Several factors strongly influence the capability of the connecting railroads to accept 

trains from BNSF. These include commuter train peak periods in Chicago, the 

complexities of rail operations in Chicago, maintenance activities, inclement weather, 

and freight and passenger rail operations east and west of Chicago. However, most of the 

tracks at Eola Yard are too short to hold these unit trains and general manifest trains that 

are en route to other railroads. When Eola Yard tracks cannot accommodate unit or 

interchange trains, the options for staging the trains at Eola are limited. Staging trains on 

one or two of the three Chicago Subdivision main tracks between West Eola and Eola 

reduces the capacity of the Chicago Subdivision. Staging trains on the eastbound yard 

running track blocks the remainder of the tracks in the yard and requires that switching 

operations cease. It is not practical to stage trains east of Eola on the Chicago Subdivision 

because of the numerous at-grade highway crossings, the dense residential land use along 

the subdivision, and because it is beyond the connection track to CN’s EJ&E rail line. 

Because of the lack of capacity in Eola Yard, and the inability to move freight trains into 

Eola Yard during the commuter peak periods, freight trains are routinely staged on one of 

the two Mendota Subdivision main tracks west of Eola. Staging of trains is especially 

common at a location approximately 24 miles west of Aurora at the 10.4 mile segment of 

rail line at the crossovers between the two main tracks at Somonauk and Earlville (on the 

Mendota Subdivision between Eola and Wyanet). Staging of trains on the Mendota 

Subdivision reduces the capacity of the rail line from two main tracks to one between the 

crossovers on the rail line segment on which a freight train is parked. In other words, 

when a freight train must wait outside of Eola Yard on the Mendota Subdivision, it 

effectively occupies the entire length of one track between crossovers. When the train is 

parked between the crossover at Somonauk and the crossover at Earlville, a 10.4 mile 

section of double track is reduced to a single track. 

2.1.2 Purpose 

The purpose of the Eola Main Line Improvements is to provide adequate track capacity to 

hold freight trains at Eola, either on a main track or a yard track, to enable on-time 

operation of the proposed Chicago to Iowa City passenger rail service on the Mendota 

Subdivision, without disrupting the on-time performance of other Amtrak intercity 

passenger trains and Metra commuter trains, and without degrading the operation of 

BNSF freight trains. The Eola Main Line Improvements would provide infrastructure at 

the Eola Yard to avoid the need to hold trains on the Mendota Subdivision and would 

restore the main-track capacity which at present is fully consumed by existing Amtrak 

long-distance and intercity passenger trains, Metra commuter passenger trains, and BNSF 

freight trains. 

 

10 Rail cars that are blocked (grouped into blocks of cars with a similar destination) are ready for 

interchange (transfer to another rail line). 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 7

2.1.3 Need for the Eola Main Line Improvements 

The need for the Eola Main Line Improvements is to enable reestablishment of the 

Chicago to Iowa City intercity passenger rail service. The current rail infrastructure at 

Eola is at capacity for the freight and passenger traffic that must travel through Eola and 

is not adequate to hold unit freight trains. The proposed new service would add one 

morning pair (one westbound and one eastbound) and one afternoon pair of Amtrak 

intercity passenger trains each day, for a total of four new trains. The new eastbound and 

westbound passenger trains would pass each other on the BNSF Mendota Subdivision in 

the Somonauk to Earlville segment. Because one track in this segment is generally 

occupied by a parked freight train, one of the Amtrak trains would be delayed each day. 

The addition of four Chicago to Iowa City passenger trains, as proposed for the Project, 

would result in a tipping point, with consequent loss of reliability and loss of on-time 

performance for Metra and Amtrak passenger trains as well as added freight-train 

congestion, longer freight transit times, loss of reliability for freight shipments, and 

higher transportation costs for shippers. BNSF has conducted Rail Traffic Controller 

(RTC) modeling that simulates the effects of the four proposed Chicago to Iowa City 

passenger trains in both the no-build (no construction of proposed tracks) and the build 

(construction of the proposed tracks) cases. The RTC modeling demonstrated that 

without the Eola Main Line Improvements two or more of the proposed Amtrak intercity 

passenger trains, or existing Amtrak trains, would be delayed each day between Mendota 

and Wyanet by an average of 15 minutes. 

Rail operations on BNSF’s main tracks through Eola are heavily influenced by the Metra 

commuter train schedule. During the morning and evening commuter peaks, main track 

capacity is almost entirely consumed by Metra trains; freight train traffic is held to 

accommodate these commuter peaks. During the morning commuter peak, local stop 

commuter trains typically use the south side main track on the Chicago Subdivision, 

while express commuter trains typically use the center main track. The north side main 

track is used for counterflow Metra trains and Amtrak trains. During the evening peak, 

the pattern reverses. The requirement for Metra trains to cross over at Eola to reach the 

Hill Yard lead tracks consumes additional main track capacity which, in fact, has a ripple 

effect on approaching trains for several miles. There is no capacity to hold a freight train 

on the main line of the Chicago Subdivision at Eola. In addition, the yard tracks are not 

of sufficient length to hold a unit train. Therefore, freight trains are held on the Mendota 

Subdivision. 

Freight trains held on the double-track Mendota Subdivision main tracks reduce the 

capacity on this rail line. Typically on a double-track main line with heavy traffic, most 

trains run one way on each of the tracks. Holding a train on one of the main tracks 

reduces the main line to a single main track usable for through-trains. The train that is 

held is typically parked between crossovers, enabling through trains to resume two-track 

operation at either end of the section on which the parked train is located. Crossovers on 

the Mendota Subdivision are spaced at 10- to 15-mile intervals. When a train is held on a 

main track, this effectively creates a 10- to 15-mile interval of single main track. The 

capacity of the remaining main track is reduced by greater than 50 percent compared to 

the capacity of two tracks. The reduced capacity is caused by the ripple effects of trains 

queuing at each end of the single-track section as they wait for trains moving in the 

opposite direction (that must reduce their speed in order to use the crossovers) and by 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

8 Service Level Environmental Assessment

trains that are unable to progress fluidly over the subdivision, creating secondary or 

incidental effects.11 Passenger trains, in particular, are affected because they must meet 

and pass on the Mendota Subdivision as they simultaneously move in opposite directions. 

The proposed new westbound intercity passenger service train would normally pass the 

new eastbound intercity passenger service train on the Mendota Subdivision between the 

crossovers at Somonauk and Earlville. Single-track sections, and the congestion of trains 

awaiting movement through the single-track sections, can create severe delays and loss of 

reliability. 

In addition to the single-track effects of trains held on the Mendota Subdivision, negative 

effects result from station stops made by passenger trains. On a double-track railroad, a 

train slowing to a station stop, boarding and deboarding passengers, and then resuming 

track speed will have no effect on trains moving in the opposite direction on the opposite 

track (that is, in the case of rail lines with station platforms on the same side as the train 

serving the station). On a single-track railroad, however, trains making station stops 

create considerable delays for trains moving in the opposite direction. On rail lines with 

heavy passenger traffic, such as the Chicago Subdivision, “single tracking” caused by 

held freight trains typically results in severe interaction delays between passenger trains. 

This would also be the case on the Mendota Subdivision with the addition of the Chicago 

to Iowa City passenger rail service. 

2.1.4 Proposed Eola Main Line Improvements 

The Eola Main Line Improvements would consist of (1) the construction of a fourth main 

track (a new lead track to Hill Yard); (2) the construction of new and reconfigured 

crossovers at West Eola and Eola; (3) the extension of the run-around track and yard 

tracks in the East Yard; and (4) the signal system required to control the new track 

configurations. The new fourth main track and crossovers would enable Metra trains to 

cross over at West Eola and Eola, from the Chicago Subdivision tracks to the Hill Yard 

lead tracks, thereby enabling a more fluid integration of the train flows on the three 

subdivisions. The new infrastructure would allow BNSF to temporarily hold one unit 

train on one of the Chicago Subdivision main lines, and the extension of the tracks in the 

East Yard would provide adequate track length to allow BNSF to temporarily stage 

freight trains on the run-around track and three of the yard tracks. The new main track 

capacity at Eola would reduce the need to use the Mendota Subdivision to stage freight 

trains that are en route to connecting railroads in Chicago (these trains would be staged at 

Eola, thereby restoring the capacity of the Mendota Subdivision to a full double-track 

main line). The improvements would thus enable the proposed four additional intercity 

passenger trains between Chicago and Iowa City to operate with minimal delay on the 

Mendota Subdivision and to travel through Eola in the opposite direction of the Metra 

trains without creating schedule adherence problems for either the Metra trains or the 

proposed service trains to Iowa. The high-speed crossovers at West Eola would enable 

 

11 Note that these queuing effects can have significant impacts on network fluidity: a stopped train might 

require 3-5 minutes to accelerate to its maximum speed, and a similar time to decelerate from its 

maximum speed to a full stop. Similarly, a freight train might require 5 minutes just to switch tracks at a 

crossover. In this regard, rail operations are not at all comparable to the rapid response of a system 

made up of automobiles, and automobile networks cannot serve as analogs for understanding rail 

networks. 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 9

Metra trains to travel at higher speeds through Eola in order to clear the yard and would 

reduce the bottleneck caused by the Metra trains crossing over from the Chicago 

Subdivision triple main tracks to the two Hill Yard lead tracks. These improvements 

would provide the required capacity both through the Eola bottleneck and on the 

Mendota Subdivision to efficiently operate the four proposed additional intercity 

passenger trains without risking undue delay to proposed and existing Amtrak passenger 

service. 

2.2 ALTERNATIVES

The following is an update to the alternatives discussion presented in the September 2009 

Service Level EA regarding the Government Bridge, and supplements the discussion of 

the Preferred Alternative (Route A –Amtrak-BNSF-IAIS) with the Eola Main Line 

Improvements that were not addressed in that document. 

Page 2-3 of the September 2009 Service Level EA states: “The passenger rail service 

would use the Arsenal Bridge to cross the Mississippi River. The U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers (USACE) owns and operates the Arsenal Bridge, but IAIS is responsible for 

the track and signal maintenance across the bridge.” The reference to the name and 

ownership of the bridge is incorrect. The bridge is known as the “Government Bridge” 

and is owned by the U.S. Army Garrison-Rock Island Arsenal (USAG-RIA), not 

USACE. USACE-Louisville, on behalf of the Department of the Army, administers the 

lease (to IAIS) of the tracks that cross the USAG-RIA between the cities of Rock Island 

and Davenport. 

2.2.1 Eola Main Line Improvements 

The proposed Eola Main Line improvements would consist of construction of a fourth 

main track (a new lead track to Hill Yard); construction of new and reconfigured 

crossovers at West Eola and Eola; extension of the run-around track and yard tracks in 

the East Yard; and installation of the signal system required to control the new track 

configurations. The new fourth main track and crossovers would enable Metra trains to 

cross from the Chicago Subdivision tracks to the Hill Yard lead tracks at West Eola and 

Eola, enabling a more fluid integration of the trains on the three subdivisions. 

Construction of the new main track would require that approximately 4,920 linear feet of 

the waterway that runs through Eola Yard be placed in a culvert. The improvements 

would also enable the proposed additional intercity passenger trains between Chicago and 

Iowa City to travel through Eola in the opposite direction of the Metra trains without 

creating schedule adherence problems. 

2.2.2 Wyanet Connection 

As stated in Section 2.3.1, Preferred Alternative (Route A – Amtrak-BNSF-IAIS) of the 

September 2009 Service Level EA, approximately 1 mile southwest of Wyanet, the 

BNSF Railway track is grade-separated over the IAIS track; there is currently no 

connection between the tracks. To permit straightaway train movements a connection 

track (approximately 4,000 feet long) would be constructed in the northwest quadrant of 

the intersection (see Figure 1-3, Wyanet Connection Section of the Project Area). The 

connection would be designed to accommodate a train speed of 50 mph. Approximately 

7 acres of ROW would be required for the proposed connection. 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

10 Service Level Environmental Assessment

2.3 TRANSPORTATION

This discussion describes impacts of the Eola Main Line Improvements on rail 

transportation while referring to the information included in the September 2009 Service 

Level EA. See Section 3.2, Transportation, of the September 2009 Service Level EA for 

the discussion of the transportation impacts of the Wyanet Connection. 

2.3.1 Affected Environment 

The following subsections supplement the descriptions of Section 3.2.1, Affected 

Environment, in the September 2009 Service Level EA. Additional subsections for 

Freight Rail and Commuter Rail have been developed to address the entire Chicago to 

Iowa City Project, including Eola. Following those discussions are sections specific to the 

transportation effects of the Eola Main Line Improvements. The transportation effects 

throughout the rest of the Chicago to Iowa City Project area are discussed in 

sections 3.2.2 and 3.2.3 of the September 2009 Service Level EA.

Regional Transportation Network 

Chapter 3, page 3-2 of the September 2009 Service Level EA refers to the availability of 

a feeder bus system from Cedar Rapids, Iowa, to Iowa City. The feeder bus system is not 

part of the initial service level of two round-trip TPD, but is anticipated to be part of the 

ultimate service level of five round-trip TPD; the feeder bus system would be evaluated 

in the subsequent tier 1 service level NEPA document and tier 2 project level NEPA 

documents prepared for the five round-trip TPD scenario. 

Freight Rail 

As discussed in Section 2.1.1, Background on Current Rail Operations, BNSF serves 

Chicago with three main lines (the Mendota and Aurora Subdivisions merging into the 

Chicago Subdivision approximately 5 miles west of West Eola and the Chillicothe 

Subdivision to the south of the Chicago Subdivision, which is not affected by the 

proposed passenger rail service) converging on the city from the west. At West Eola, the 

two “Hill Yard” signalized leads diverge from the Chicago Subdivision main lines and 

carry Metra commuter trains to and from the Aurora Transportation Center at Aurora. 

Crossover tracks at West Eola and at Eola are used to sort train traffic onto the 

appropriate main tracks to attain the best possible schedule adherence for both passenger 

and freight trains. 

The inability of the connecting railroads to accept trains from BNSF is strongly 

influenced by commuter train peak periods in Chicago, the complexities of railroad 

operations in the east side of Chicago, and operations east of Chicago. Unfortunately, 

most of the Eola Yard tracks are not of sufficient length to hold these trains, and when 

multiple trains must be staged at Eola, successive trains must be tied down where they 

block and thus limit through-train operations. In particular, when Eola Yard tracks cannot 

accommodate unit or interchange trains, such trains are staged (1) on one or two of the 

three Chicago Subdivision main tracks between East and West Eola; (2) on the eastbound 

yard running track, which blocks the remainder of the yard’s tracks and requires 

switching operations to cease; or (3) on one of the two Mendota Subdivision main tracks 

west of Eola, which reduces the Mendota Subdivision from two main tracks to one 

between those crossovers where the freight train is parked. Rail operations on main tracks 

through Eola are heavily influenced by Metra commuter train schedule adherence 

requirements. During the morning and evening commuter peaks, main track capacity is 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 11

mostly consumed by commuter trains; freight train traffic declines. During the morning 

commuter peak, local-stop commuter trains typically use the south main track, while 

express commuter trains typically use the center main track. The north main track is used 

for counterflow Metra trains and Amtrak trains. During the evening peak, the pattern 

reverses. 

Commuter Rail 

The Metra commuter rail system operates in six counties (Cook, Du Page, Kane, Lake, 

McHenry, and Will) in the Chicago metropolitan area and in more than 100 communities, 

with 239 stations on 11 routes. An average of 325,000 passengers ride Metra each 

weekday; the 2008 annual ridership was more than 86.8 million passengers and is the 

second largest commuter rail operation in the nation. Metra operates an average of 

110 TPD, both revenue and nonrevenue, on its BNSF Railway line from Chicago Union 

Station to Aurora. Weekday ridership averages 63,200 passengers on this route. Metra 

operates an average of 54 TPD on its Rock Island District route from Chicago’s La Salle 

Station to Joliet. Weekday ridership averages 35,600 passengers on this route (Metra, 

2009). Metra service was evaluated as part of the Chicago to Iowa City Service 

Development Plan. Tier 2 project level NEPA evaluation of the capacity, operational, and 

infrastructure requirements for the BNSF Eola Yard (as well as the Chicago hub area) 

would be conducted to minimize, avoid, or mitigate impacts on existing Metra, Amtrak, 

and freight railroad service. 

The City of Moline, Illinois, has conducted a preliminary commuter rail feasibility study 

for service between Silvis, Illinois, and Rock Island, Illinois. The proposed commuter rail 

service would be operated by the Rock Island County Metropolitan Mass Transit District 

(MetroLINK). The commuter rail system would operate on a 12.4-mile route connecting 

Silvis, East Moline, Moline, and Rock Island (Hanson Professional Services, 2008). A 

specific tier 2 project level NEPA evaluation, “Illinois Track Improvements,” would be 

conducted for the proposed alignment in Illinois to address the infrastructure and 

operations requirements for the new service, existing freight service, and potential 

commuter rail service. In addition to the City of Moline feasibility study, FRA provided 

comments regarding Metra and MetroLINK operations, which are included in 

Attachment 9, Agency Comment Letters. 

Chapter 3, page 3-6 of the September 2009 Service Level EA cites ridership numbers 

from a 1998 Amtrak study. The relative percentages of travel by mode (automobile and 

other passenger vehicles, air, and bus) from this study were used for analysis of train 

ridership; absolute numbers for the analysis were derived from the 2008 Amtrak 

feasibility studies. There have been no substantial changes in transportation systems for 

travel modes between Chicago and Iowa City, and the relative percentages of travel by 

mode from 1998 are the best available information. 

2.3.2 No-Build Alternative 

The No-Build Alternative would not result in changes to existing railroad infrastructure 

or operations. The Eola Main Line Improvements would not be constructed, and no 

passenger rail service would be added between Chicago and Iowa City. Therefore, the 

No-Build Alternative would not result in impacts on or improvements to transportation in 

the Eola Main Line Improvements section of the Project area. 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

12 Service Level Environmental Assessment

2.3.3 Preferred Alternative - Two Round-trip Trains per Day 

The proposed Eola Main Line Improvements consist of construction of a fourth main 

track, which can be thought of as a new Hill Yard lead track or “race track” through Eola, 

and construction of new and reconfigured crossovers at East and West Eola. These new 

track configurations would require that the control signal system be updated as well. 

From a passenger train operations perspective, the new fourth main track and crossovers 

would enable Metra trains to crossover at Eola as well as at West Eola, from the Chicago 

Subdivision tracks to the Hill Yard leads, enabling a more fluid integration of the train 

flows on the three subdivisions. 

The proposed Chicago to Iowa City intercity passenger service would initially add two 

round trips per day, for a total of four new passenger TPD through Eola. One of the 

proposed two round-trip TPD trains traveling from Chicago to Iowa City would be 

travelling from Chicago to Iowa City in the morning and from Iowa City to Chicago in 

the evening, and one of the trains would depart from Iowa City to Chicago in the morning 

and from Chicago to Iowa City in the evening. The movement of these trains would be 

contrary to the Metra Commuter trains which travel into Chicago in the morning and out 

of Chicago in the evening. The new track capacity gained from the improvements would 

enable the proposed two additional round-trip TPD to travel through Eola in the opposite 

direction of the Metra trains, without creating schedule adherence problems for either the 

Metra trains or the proposed new Iowa service trains. 

The high-speed crossovers at West Eola would enable Metra trains to travel at higher 

speeds through Eola in order to clear the yard and reduce the bottleneck caused by the 

Metra trains crossing-over from the Chicago Subdivision triple-main tracks to the twomain tracks (Hill Yard leads). 

From a freight train operations perspective, the proposed improvements would result in a 

minimal lengthening of yard tracks to accommodate trains being staged for interchanges, 

primarily with CN. This would eliminate the need to hold trains on the Chicago 

Subdivision main tracks or on the Mendota Subdivision main track, thus clearing a path 

for the proposed Chicago to Iowa City intercity passenger service. 

In essence, the combined main line and yard improvements would provide the required 

capacity both through the Eola bottleneck and on the Mendota Subdivision to efficiently 

operate the four proposed additional intercity passenger trains without risking undue 

delay to the proposed and existing Amtrak passenger service. 

2.3.4 Preferred Alternative - Five Round-trip Trains per Day 

According to Section 3.2.3, Impacts of Proposed Action and Alternatives – Five 

Round-trip Trains per Day Scenario, of the September 2009 Service Level EA 

(Chapter 3, page 3-11), the addition of five round-trip TPD (10 new passenger trains 

through Eola) would require considerable coordination among the various entities that 

operate within the Project area, including simulations to identify infrastructure needs, and 

scheduling adjustments for maintenance activities and train traffic. With the Eola Main 

Line Improvements, the impact of the additional trains would be substantially reduced 

compared to operating on the existing infrastructure which would, in effect, not function 

with the new trains. 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 13

2.4 NOISE AND VIBRATION

This section discusses the methodology and potential impacts related to the operational 

airborne noise and potential ground-borne vibration (GBV) from the proposed Eola Main 

Line Improvements section of the Project area. 

As part of the September 2009 Service Level EA, a General Noise Assessment and a 

General Vibration Assessment were performed for rail sections between Chicago and 

Iowa City (September 2009 Service Level EA, Section 3.7 and Appendix C). The 

proposed Eola Main Line Improvements were addressed only in the cumulative impacts 

discussion, whereas noise and vibration impacts were assessed for the Wyanet 

Connection section of the Project area. However, the Eola Main Line Improvements lie 

within the rail sections assessed for the September 2009 Service Level EA, and the 

results of the September 2009 Service Level EA have been reevaluated for the Eola Main 

Line Improvements. After a confirmation that the assumptions made in the previous 

assessment remain valid for the current Eola Main Line Improvements, the effects of the 

proposed changes were considered and the potential impacts of the proposed realignment 

of the main line and special track were evaluated. Refer to Appendix C of the September 

2009 Service Level EA for a more complete discussion of methods used for these 

evaluations. 

2.4.1 Noise Assessment 

The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and FRA established similar procedures and 

guidelines for assessing train noise. Train noise is expressed in units of A-weighted 

decibels (dBA) using the day-night noise level (Ldn) to assess train noise near land use 

areas where people sleep (primarily residences, but could include hotels, hospitals, etc.). 

The Ldn can be thought of as a 24-hour average noise level that penalizes noise events 

that happen at night because most people are more annoyed by nighttime noise than they 

are by daytime noise. 

This tier 1 service level NEPA review assessed only Project-related noise at land use 

areas where people sleep, which is consistent with FRA guidance for tier 1 service level 

NEPA reviews. Residences were identified by visual inspection of digital aerial 

photographs; no windshield surveys were performed. 

The FTA noise impact criteria are defined by two curves, representing severe and 

moderate noise impacts, which are defined below. 

• Severe Impact. A significant percentage of people are highly annoyed by 

noise in this range. Noise mitigation would normally be specified for severe 

impact areas unless it is not feasible or reasonable (unless there is no practical 

method of mitigating the impact). 

• Moderate Impact. In this range, other project-specific factors are considered 

to determine the magnitude of the impact and the need for mitigation. These 

factors include the predicted increase over existing noise levels, the types and 

number of noise-sensitive land uses affected, existing outdoor-indoor sound 

insulation, and the cost-effectiveness of mitigating noise to more acceptable 

levels. 

The FTA noise impact criteria are summarized in Chart 2.4-1. The chart illustrates 

existing noise exposure and Project-related noise exposure, and demonstrates that FTA 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

14 Service Level Environmental Assessment

noise impact thresholds vary with existing noise levels. Although the chart references all 

three land use categories used by FTA, this analysis focused on Category 2 (residential 

land uses and any buildings where people sleep, such as hotels and hospitals). 

Chart 2.4-1 

FTA Noise Impact Criteria 

Refer to Appendix C of the September 2009 Service Level EA for a discussion of the 

methodology used in these assessments. Table 2.4-1 summarizes the train traffic 

conditions used in assessing the Project. 

Table 2.4-1 

Summary of Traffic Conditions 

Traffic Type Trains 

per Day 

No. of 

Locomotives 

No. of 

Cars 

Speed 

(mph) 

Existing Freight Trains 36.0 2.6 74.8 60 

Existing Passenger Trains 89.1 1.0 11.4 60 

Future (Proposed) Passenger Trains 4.0 1.0 8.0 70 

The Eola Main Line Improvements section of the Project area lies in a quiet zone, and no 

at-grade crossings exist in the area; therefore, horn noise was not modeled. 

No-Build Alternative 

This analysis assumes that train-induced noise would not change anywhere throughout 

the Project area under the No-Build Alternative. Consequently, no new noise impacts are 

projected to occur beyond those that could occur due to other projects. 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 15

Preferred Alternative - Two Round-trip Trains per Day 

This portion of the analysis is based on the proposed addition of two round-trip TPD at 

70 mph through Eola Yard. Table 2.4-2 summarizes the calculated impact threshold 

contour distances (the area where noise impacts are predicted to occur) for the existing 

and proposed conditions. 

Table 2.4-2 

Impact Threshold Contour Distances 

Impact Existing Conditions 

Noise Impact Contour 

Distance (feet)

(No-Build Alternative)

Future Conditions Noise Impact 

Contour Distance (feet)

(Two Round-Trip TPD)

Future Conditions Noise 

Impact Contour Distance 

(feet)

(Five Round-Trip TPD) 

Moderate 256 261 268 

Severe 134 137 141 

The incremental increase in the moderate and severe noise impact contour distances are 

5 feet and 3 feet, respectively. These distances are within the combined margin of error 

associated with the digital aerial photographs and the noise modeling methodology used 

in this assessment. Based on these distances, there are seven incremental moderate noise 

impacts potentially resulting from the Eola Main Line Improvements, all in a small 

cluster of homes near the extreme western end of Eola Yard (Figure 2.4-1, Vibration and 

Noise Contours and Impacts); there are no additional severe noise impacts. Because the 

magnitude of change in the noise contour distance is so small, and there are no additional 

severe noise impacts, noise mitigation measures are not recommended. 

Preferred Alternative - Five Round-trip Trains per Day 

Table 2.4-2 presents a simple comparison of noise contour distances under each of the 

ranges of rail traffic, including a proposed five round-trip TPD scenario. These data 

indicate the incremental increases over existing conditions for moderate and severe noise 

impact contour distances are 12 and 7 feet, respectively. 

2.4.2 Ground-borne Vibration Assessment 

Refer to Appendix C of the September 2009 Service Level EA for a discussion of the 

vibration assessment methodology used in this analysis. Based on the daily train counts 

for the current and anticipated rail usage, the FTA frequent-event criterion of 72 vibration 

decibels is applied in this assessment (this is the vibration impact threshold). The 

FTA/FRA vibration impact assessment methodology uses vibration decibels (VdB) 

relative to a reference of 1 microinch per second (10-6 inches per second). The FTA/FRA 

frequent-event criterion represents the most conservative vibration impact threshold. 

GBV impact distances used in this assessment are the same as those used in the 

September 2009 Service Level EA and are summarized in the following table. 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

16 Service Level Environmental Assessment

Table 2.4-3 

Distances to Category 2 Ground-borne Vibration Impacts 

Scenario GBV Impact 

Level 

(VdB) 

Distance to Impact Level (feet) for Traffic Condition 

Traffic Condition Ga Traffic Condition Ha

Existing Use: 60 mph 72 450 560 

Future Use: 70 mph 72 509 520 

Future Use: 90 mph 72 620 773 

Notes: 

a

 Traffic conditions are discussed in Section 3.7.1 of the September 2009 Service Level EA. Both of these 

conditions represent freight and passenger trains in the corridor from Chicago to Aurora. Future 

passenger trains would operate at 70 mph in traffic condition G and 55 mph in traffic condition H; all 

other conditions are the same. 

The tier 1 service level NEPA review assessed only Project-related GBV at land uses 

where people sleep (primarily residences) for the same reasons as noted in Section 2.4.1, 

Noise Assessment. 

No-Build Alternative 

This analysis assumes that train-induced GBV would not change anywhere throughout 

the Project area under the No-Build Alternative. Consequently, no new vibration impacts 

are projected to occur beyond those that could occur due to other projects. 

Preferred Alternative - Two Round-Trip Trains per Day 

Both the existing and proposed (two round-trip TPD) rail traffic was assessed; this 

allowed the analysis to identify the incremental increase in GBV effects on residential 

land uses near the Eola Rail Yard. The incremental increases in the vibration impact 

contours are quite small, on the order of 10 feet. Analysis results indicate that the 

proposed improvements may result in vibration impacts at twelve residences. 

The potentially affected residences are near the existing Eola Yard. Noise and vibration 

associated with the existing rail yard were not assessed in this assessment. Car-to-car 

coupling events in the rail yard create audible and tactile noise events: you can hear them 

and feel them. Eola Yard is a busy yard, and residences are exposed to numerous car 

coupling events each day. The incremental increase in GBV associated with the proposed 

improvements in the yard would be quite small, and it is possible that the project-related 

vibration levels would be comparable to the vibration events created by railcar 

movements in the existing yard. On this basis, vibration mitigation is not recommended. 

Preferred Alternative - Five Round-trip Trains per Day 

The operation of five round-trip TPD would have the same incremental increase in GBV 

as the two round-trip TPD increase; however, this scenario also includes the potential to 

increase speeds to 90 mph, which would result in an increase of distances to category 2 

GBV impacts. 

Table 2.4-3 shows that as the train speed increases, the distance to the GBV impact 

contour also increases. Areas beyond the vibration impact contour are predicted to 

experience train-induced GBV levels below the FTA/FRA vibration impact threshold. 

Appendix C of the September 2009 Service Level EA contains a more detailed discussion 

of the noise and vibration analyses. 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 17

Figure 2.4-1, Vibration and Noise Contours and Impacts, presents the noise and vibration 

impact contours, and also identifies the location of the predicted project-related noise and 

vibration impacts. 

2.5 AIR QUALITY

Section 3.8, Air Quality, of the September 2009 Service Level EA addresses air quality 

impacts of the operations of the proposed passenger rail service between Chicago and 

Iowa City in sufficient detail for tier 1 service level NEPA analysis. Additional analysis 

of air quality impacts would be conducted as part of the tier 2 project level NEPA 

analysis. 

The following provides an update on the United States Environmental Protection 

Agency’s (EPA’s) determinations of nonattainment status that were pending when the 

September 2009 Service Level EA was published and adds discussion of potential 

impacts on sulfur dioxide levels. 

The September 2009 Service Level EA notes, on page 3-47, that in 2006 EPA lowered its 

24-hour ambient air quality health standard for fine particulate matter with a diameter of 

2.5 microns or smaller, known as PM-2.5, from 65 to 35 micrometers per cubic meter of 

air. Based on air quality monitoring from 2005 through 2007, EPA had recommended 

designating part of Scott County, Iowa, and all of Rock Island County, Illinois, as 

nonattainment for PM-2.5. However, based on the consideration of 2006 through 2008 

monitoring data, EPA designated Scott County and Rock Island County as attainment in 

the final rule published in the Federal Register (FR, November 13, 2009). Consequently, 

the nonattainment and maintenance areas within the Project area are limited to those 

listed in Table 3.8-1 of the September 2009 Service Level EA. 

September 2009 Service Level EA Errata 

Section 3.8, Air Quality, page 3-48, bulleted list following the second paragraph: 

• Ozone (O3), 100 tons per year of either nitrogen oxides (NOx) or volatile 

organic compounds (VOCs) 

• PM-2.5, 100 tons per year 

• Particulate matter less than 10 micrometers in diameter (PM-10), 100 tons per 

year 

• Sulfur dioxide (SO2), 100 tons per year 

Section 3.8.2, Two Round-trip Trains per Day, Preferred Alternative (Route A – AmtrakBNSF-IAIS), page 3-49, second-to-last sentence in second paragraph: The amount of 

hydrocarbons (HC), SO2, and carbon monoxide (CO) would decrease; NOx, PM-10, and 

PM-2.5 would increase. 

 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

18 Service Level Environmental Assessment

Section 3.8.2, Two Round-trip Trains per Day, page 3-49: 

Table 3.8-2 

Estimated Changes in Air Pollutants from Diversion of Vehicle and Plane Trips 

(tons per year)a

Pollutant Additional Train 

Emissions 

Reduction in Emissions 

Net Change 

Vehicles Planes 

HC 5.06 -11.55 -0.45 -6.94 

CO 22.03 -218.56 -2.81 -199.34 

NOx 108.51 -9.61 -8.99 89.90 

PM-10 2.82 -0.45 0.00 2.36 

PM-2.5 2.73 -0.45 0.00 2.28 

SO2 0.08 -0.15 0.00 -0.07 

carbon dioxide (CO2) 8,417.51 -8,381.63 -2,036.46 -2,000.59 

Notes: 

a

 Calculations of emissions from vehicles (including a mix of automobiles, light trucks, and sport utility 

vehicles) and trains were performed using EPA emission factors (Energy Information Administration, no 

date; EPA, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, April 2009; EPA, Office of Transportation and Air 

Quality, August 2005; Federal Highway Administration [FHWA], Office of Natural and Human 

Environment, April 2005; U.S. Department of Energy, no date; EPA, Technology Transfer Network, no 

date). 

Section 3.8.2, Two Round-trip Trains per Day, page 3-50: 

Table 3.8-3 

Summary of General Conformity Determination for Preferred Alternativea

Pollutant Route Miles in 

Area 

De Minimis 

Threshold 

Train Emissions 

Increase 

Net Emissions 

Changeb

Chicago PM-2.5 and O3 Nonattainment Areac

HC 46 100 1.06 -1.87 

NOx 46 100 22.79 18.19 

PM-2.5 46 100 0.57 0.46 

SO2 46 100 0.02 -0.02 

Lyons Township (McCook, Illinois) PM-10 Maintenance Area 

PM-10 4 100 0.05 0.04 

Notes: 

a

 All numbers are in tons per year. 

b

 Includes reduction in vehicle and plane emissions from trips diverted. 

c

 The Chicago nonattainment area includes the counties and townships listed in Table 3.8-1 and shown 

 in Figure 3.8-1. 

Section 3.8.2, Two Round-trip Trains per Day, Route B Alternative (Amtrak-CNMetra/Rock Island District-CSXT-IAIS), page 3-50, second-to-last sentence in second 

paragraph: 

The amount of HC, SO2, and CO would decrease (the decrease of HC and SO2 would be 

less compared to the Preferred Alternative); NOx, PM-10, and PM-2.5 would increase. 

 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 19

Section 3.8.2, Two Round-trip Trains per Day, Route B Alternative (Amtrak-CNMetra/Rock Island District-CSXT-IAIS), page 3-51: 

Table 3.8-4 

Estimated Changes in Air Pollutants from Diversion of Vehicle and Plane Trips 

(tons per year) 

Pollutant Additional Train Emissionsa

Reduction in Emissions 

Net Change 

Vehicles Planes 

HC 4.32 -9.09 -0.35 -5.11 

CO 18.82 -171.86 -2.21 -155.25 

NOx 92.70 -7.56 -7.07 78.07 

PM-10 2.41 -0.36 0.00 2.05 

PM-2.5 2.33 -0.36 0.00 1.98 

SO2 0.07 -0.12 0.00 -0.05 

CO2 7,191.05 -6,590.69 -1,600.08 -999.72 

Notes: 

a

 Calculations of emissions from vehicles (including a mix of automobiles, light trucks, and sport utility 

vehicles) and trains were performed using EPA emission factors (Energy Information Administration, no 

date; EPA, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, April 2009; EPA, Office of Transportation and Air 

Quality, August 2005; FHWA, Office of Natural and Human Environment, April 2005; U.S. Department of 

Energy, no date; EPA, Technology Transfer Network, no date). 

Section 3.8.2, Two Round-trip Trains per Day, Route B Alternative (Amtrak-CNMetra/Rock Island District-CSXT-IAIS), page 3-51: 

Table 3.8-5 

Summary of General Conformity Determination for Route B Alternativea

Pollutant Route Miles in 

Area 

De Minimis 

Threshold 

Train Emissions 

Increase 

Net Emissions 

Changeb

Chicago PM-2.5 and O3 Nonattainment Areac

Hydrocarbons 60 100 1.09 -1.22 

NOx 60 100 23.37 19.76 

PM-2.5 60 100 0.59 0.50 

SO2 60 100 0.02 -0.01 

Southeast Chicago (Lake Calumet) PM-10 Maintenance Area 

PM-10 4 100 0.03 0.02 

Notes: 

a

 All numbers are in tons per year 

b

 Includes reduction in vehicle and plane emissions from trips diverted 

c

 The Chicago nonattainment area includes the counties and townships listed in Table 3.8-1 and shown 

 in Figure 3.8-1. 

Section 3.8.3, Five Round-trip Trains per Day, page 3-52, second paragraph, second-tolast sentence: The amount of HC, SO2, and CO would decrease (the decrease would be 

more than that under the two round-trip TPD scenario); PM-10, PM-2.5, and NOx would 

increase. 

 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

20 Service Level Environmental Assessment

Section 3.8.3, Five Round-trip Trains per Day, page 3-52: 

Table 3.8-6 

Estimated Changes in Air Pollutants from Diversion of Vehicle and Plane Trips 

(tons per year) 

Pollutant Additional Train Emissionsa

Reduction in Emissions 

Net Change 

Vehicle Plane 

HC 12.97 -34.07 -0.88 -21.98 

CO 59.50 -644.49 -5.55 -590.53 

NOx 293.03 -28.35 -17.77 246.91 

PM-10 7.61 -1.34 0.00 6.27 

PM-2.5 7.38 -1.34 0.00 6.04 

SO2 0.21 -0.45 0.00 -0.24 

CO2 22,731.77 -24,715.07 -4,024.44 -6,007.74 

Notes: 

a

 Calculations of emissions from vehicles (including a mix of automobiles, light trucks, and sport utility 

vehicles) and trains were performed using EPA emission factors (Energy Information Administration no 

date; EPA, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, April 2009; EPA, Office of Transportation and Air 

Quality, August 2005; FHWA, Office of Natural and Human Environment April 2005; U.S. Department of 

Energy, no date; EPA, Technology Transfer Network, no date).

2.6 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

2.6.1 Eola Main Line Improvements 

A search of databases, review of historical aerials and topographic maps, interviews with 

the property owner, and a field reconnaissance was conducted to identify recognized 

environmental conditions (RECs) within the Eola Main Line Improvements section of the 

Project area. A field visit was conducted on June 23, 2010. Details of the hazardous 

materials assessment are documented in the Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment 

(PESA), dated July 2010, and included in Attachment 1. 

The Eola Main Line Improvements would be constructed within existing BNSF ROW. 

The land use near Eola Yard is primarily residential on the east end, industrial on the 

west end, with some agricultural fields adjacent to the middle of the yard. A rail line was 

constructed through the project limits in 1848 and Eola Yard began functioning as a rail 

yard as early as the 1870s. 

Hazardous material incidences have been reported within Eola Yard. The rail yard is 

listed in databases for Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 

Liability Information System (CERCLIS), Emergency Response Notification System 

(ERNS), State Hazardous Waste Sites (SHWS), leaking underground storage tanks 

(LUSTs), underground storage tanks (USTs), Hazardous Materials Incident Report 

System (HMIRS), Spills, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)-nongenerator sites12, and Facility Index System (FINDS) for the incidences that have 

occurred on the project site. Most have been minor spills. 

 

12 A RCRA-non-generator site is a hazardous waste handler that does not generate any quantity of 

hazardous waste during the current reporting period. 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 21

On January 20, 1993, a BNSF train collided head-on with a Southern Pacific train in Eola 

Yard, spilling approximately 10,000 gallons of diesel fuel. Some of the soils were 

removed for remediation; however, due to the location of the spill in relation to the 

existing railroad tracks some of the contamination remained in place and in-situ 

remediation was performed (see Figure 2.6-1, Eola Main Line Improvements 

Environmental Constraints). Contaminants did migrate to adjacent properties on the 

southwest side of Eola Yard. The site is enrolled into the Illinois State Site Unit and 

remediation activities are ongoing. 

A locomotive released diesel fuel in 2008 approximately 0.7 miles east of McClure Road 

near the main line tracks (see Figure 2.6-1, Eola Main Line Improvements Environmental 

Constraints). This is an active site enrolled into the Illinois State Site Unit SRP and is 

currently undergoing remediation. 

The entire rail yard is considered a REC due to the hazardous materials spills, its 

historical railroad use, and the materials transported through the yard. Adjacent properties 

on both sides of the western end of the yard are industrial. Several properties are listed in 

the environmental databases and would be considered RECs due to their current uses. 

A risk assessment category would be assigned during tier 2 project level NEPA 

documentation. However; based on Illinois State Geological Survey (ISGS) risk 

assessment rating categories the site has a high risk of contamination given the presence 

of spills and leaks documented on EPA and state databases, which are currently being 

remediated (see Attachment 1 for more information on REC sites). 

The EPA listing of potential, suspected, and known hazardous waste or hazardous 

substance sites in Illinois (the CERCLIS list) has been reviewed to ascertain whether the 

Eola Main Line Improvements would involve any listed sites. As a result of this review, 

it has been determined that the proposed undertaking would not require any ROW or any 

easement from a site included in the CERCLIS listing as of June 25, 2010. 

2.6.2 Wyanet Connection 

Hazardous material issues relevant to the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area

were evaluated through a field study and an environmental report. The issues were then 

further assessed through database research. 

ISGS completed a PESA on April 8, 2010, to identify and evaluate RECs that may 

indicate releases or potential releases of hazardous substances on, at, in, or to the 

proposed Wyanet Connection (see Attachment 2). 

The proposed Wyanet Connection would be constructed in a rural area approximately 

1 mile southwest of Wyanet; the northern (closest) extent of the Wyanet Connection 

section of the Project area is approximately 0.7 miles west of the southwestern edge of 

Wyanet. The Wyanet Connection section of the Project area consists of a mixture of 

agricultural land, undeveloped forested land, and railroad ROW. ISGS investigated two 

sites during the field work for the PESA: the Wyanet Connection section of the Project 

area (defined by ISGS as Site 2191-1) and a section of Pond Creek within this area and 

extending approximately 1,500 feet southeast (defined by ISGS as Site 2191-2). The 

presence of RECs was determined for each site; each potential issue was considered a 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

22 Service Level Environmental Assessment

REC. The PESA identified four RECs and two de minimis conditions at Site 2191-1 and 

none at Site 2191-2. 

Site 2191-1, Field Observations 

Piles of 5-gallon plastic and metal buckets with labels identifying them as “railroad curve 

grease” were observed during the PESA field work in several areas along the IAIS rail 

line from approximately 1,500 feet to 2,000 feet west of the BNSF rail line (see 

Figure 2.6-2, Wyanet Connection Environmental Constraints, and Attachment 2). Some 

of the labels on the buckets identified the grease as soy-based and biodegradable; others 

identified it as petroleum based. There were approximately 50 buckets on the north side 

of the IAIS rail line and a few scattered on the south side of the tracks. A slight smell of 

petroleum was noted near the buckets (ISGS, April 8, 2010). 

A large pile of metal debris was observed during the PESA field work along the south 

side of the IAIS tracks from approximately 1,600 feet to 1,800 feet west of the BNSF rail 

line (see Figure 2.6-2, Wyanet Connection Environmental Constraints, and 

Attachment 2). The debris appeared to have been dumped down the slope from the 

adjoining agricultural field to the south and contained an aboveground storage tank 

(AST), metal grain bins, a metal drainage culvert, wire fencing, and corrugated sheeting. 

The debris did not appear to be on existing railroad ROW but was located at the fence 

line between the railroad and adjoining property. The debris appeared to be within the 

Wyanet Connection section of the Project area. It is unknown whether the AST contained 

any residual liquids at the time of disposal; the PESA did not note any stained soils, 

distressed vegetation, or organic odors at the site of the AST that ISGS personnel 

observed, and the AST was not observed by HDR Engineering, Inc. (HDR) personnel 

during their site visit. 

In addition, the IAIS rail line had numerous piles of used railroad ties (about 20 used ties 

per pile) located primarily on the north side of the tracks; the piles were spaced 

approximately every 40 feet. Scattered, loose, used railroad ties were also located 

throughout the length of both rail lines (ISGS, April 8, 2010). 

Site 2191-1, Summary 

The following RECs were identified at Site 2191-1: an AST; potential chemical presence 

related to the buckets labeled “railroad curve grease”; solid waste; and unusual or 

noxious odors related to the “railroad curve grease” buckets. The following de minimis

conditions were identified at this site: likely pesticide and/or herbicide use based on 

agricultural land use and potential lead-based paint (ISGS, April 8, 2010). A risk 

assessment category would be assigned during tier 2 project level NEPA documentation. 

However, based on ISGS risk assessment rating categories the site has a moderate risk of 

contamination given the presence of “railroad curve grease,” which has not been verified 

by testing. 

Site 2191-2, Field Observations 

A southward-flowing creek runs along the north side of the IAIS railroad tracks and 

crosses under the tracks just west of the intersection of the BNSF and IAIS rail lines. No 

visual evidence of stressed vegetation, depressions, mounding or soil piles, lagoons or 

surface impoundments, stained soil or pavement, water discoloration, fill, ASTs or USTs, 

pumps or dispensers, protruding pipes, pipelines, drums, monitoring wells, pits, solid 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 23

waste, transformers, nonpetroleum chemical use or storage, or unusual or noxious odors 

were noted during a site visit by ISGS on April 2, 2010 (ISGS, April 8, 2010). 

No data gaps were identified for this site. Because there are no buildings present and no 

evidence of fill or demolition debris was observed, asbestos-containing materials and lead 

paint are unlikely to be present at this site. 

Site 2191-2, Summary 

No RECS or de minimis conditions were identified at this site. 

Hazardous Material Database Review of the Wyanet Connection Section of the Project Area 

Subsequent to and separate from the PESA, the following databases were searched for the 

Wyanet Connection section of the Project area on June 25, 2010: 

• EPA Federal Registry System (EPA FRS) 

• Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) Incident 

Reports Database 

• Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Illinois EPA) Bureau of Land 

Data-Center Inventory Report 

• Illinois EPA Site Remediation Program 

• Illinois EPA Facility Compliance Tracking System 

• Illinois EPA Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incidents 

• Illinois Emergency Management Agency Hazardous Materials Incident 

Reports Database 

The EPA listing of potential, suspected, and known hazardous waste or hazardous 

substance sites in Illinois (the CERCLIS list) has been reviewed to ascertain whether the 

proposed Wyanet Connection would involve any listed site(s). As a result of this review, 

it has been determined that the proposed undertaking would not require any ROW or any 

easement from a site included in the CERCLIS listing as of June 25, 2010. There are no 

Superfund or CERCLIS sites within 1 mile of the proposed Wyanet Connection (EPA 

FRS, June 25, 2010). The closest REC site is 0.7 miles east of the northern end of the 

Wyanet Connection section of the Project area (EPA FRS, June 25, 2010; Illinois EPA, 

no date a; Illinois EPA, no date b; Illinois EPA, June 24, 2010; Illinois EPA, June 25, 

2010). No hazardous material incidents involving trains have been reported within 

5 miles of Wyanet (PHMSA, no date). Two hazardous material incidents involving trucks 

have been reported in the vicinity of Wyanet; the location of these incidents is not within 

1 mile of the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area. Both of these incidents 

occurred in 1989 (Illinois Emergency Management Agency, no date). 

2.6.3 No-Build Alternative 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

The No-Build Alternative would not result in construction or appreciable change to the 

current track configuration or operating conditions of Eola Yard. Therefore, the No-Build 

Alternative would not impact any of the potential hazardous materials sites adjacent to or 

within Eola Yard. 

Wyanet Connection 

The No-Build Alternative would not result in changes to existing railroad infrastructure 

or operations. The Wyanet Connection would not be constructed, and no passenger rail 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

24 Service Level Environmental Assessment

service would be added between Chicago and Iowa City. Therefore, the No-Build 

Alternative would not affect the potential hazardous material sites along the IAIS rail line 

or near Wyanet. 

2.6.4 Preferred Alternative – Two Round-trip Trains per Day 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

The Preferred Alternative, which includes two round-trip TPD, would not require the 

acquisition of ROW. All construction activities would occur within the existing BNSF 

ROW. Because Eola Yard is considered to be a REC, it is possible that contaminated soil 

would be encountered during construction. If any contamination is encountered, the 

proper agencies would be notified and the contaminated soil would be handled and 

disposed of in accordance with Illinois regulations. Detailed hazardous material/special 

waste studies would be conducted in a manner consistent with Illinois DOT and Iowa 

DOT protocols and would be documented in subsequent tier 2 project level NEPA 

documents. 

Wyanet Connection 

Implementation of the Preferred Alternative would necessitate construction of the 

Wyanet Connection and would result in the addition of two round-trip passenger TPD on 

the existing BNSF and IAIS rail lines. Construction of the Wyanet Connection would 

disturb ground where ISGS personnel observed buckets labeled “railroad curve grease” in 

April 2010. Soil in the vicinity of the observed buckets would be tested for contamination 

prior to construction. If any contamination is encountered, the proper agencies would be 

notified and the contaminated soil would be handled and disposed of in accordance with 

Illinois regulations. Worker protection would be provided if needed. Detailed hazardous 

material/special waste studies would be conducted in a manner consistent with Illinois 

DOT and Iowa DOT protocols and would be documented in subsequent tier 2 project 

level NEPA documents. 

Relocation of Pond Creek as part of the construction of the Wyanet Connection could 

potentially affect the metal debris observed south of the IAIS rail line. If stream 

relocation activities affect the metal debris, the debris would be handled and disposed of 

in accordance with Illinois regulations after contacting the proper agencies. Soils in the 

vicinity of the debris would be tested for contamination as warranted; contaminated soil, 

if found, would be handled and disposed of in accordance with Illinois regulations. 

None of the REC sites to the east of the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 

would be affected by construction of the connection or by operation of trains on the 

connection. 

2.6.5 Preferred Alternative – Five Round-trip Trains per Day 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

The effects of the Preferred Alternative with five round-trip TPD would be similar to 

those of the two round-trip TPD scenario. Construction would affect the same area within 

the BNSF ROW as the two round-trip TPD scenario. The only REC that would be 

affected is Eola Yard. Similar actions should be taken if contaminated soil is encountered 

during construction. 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 25

Wyanet Connection 

The effects of running five round-trip TPD would be similar to those of the two 

round-trip TPD scenario. Construction of the Wyanet Connection would affect the same 

area as the Preferred Alternative, affecting the same REC at the proposed connection site. 

Similar actions with respect to potential contamination would be completed. None of the 

REC sites to the east of the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area would be 

affected by construction of the connection or by operation of trains on the connection. 

2.7 CULTURAL RESOURCES

HDR reviewed archival information and conducted archaeological and historic property 

field reconnaissance investigations for the Eola Main Line section of the Project area and 

summarized the investigations in a technical memorandum (Attachment 3). On July 20, 

2010, the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency concurred with the reconnaissance survey 

for Eola Yard. The concurrence letter is in Attachment 9. 

In accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1996, as 

amended, a record search was conducted by Illinois State Archaeological Survey, 

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign for known cultural resource sites within 1 

mile of the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area. The record search did not 

identify any archaeological resources or historic structures listed in or eligible for 

inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). On March 18, 2010, a 

Phase I archaeological reconnaissance survey was also conducted by Illinois State 

Archaeological Survey, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The survey located 

no archaeological material or historic structures within the Wyanet Connection section of 

the Project area. The reconnaissance survey results, noting that no archaeological 

material was identified and recommending project clearance, were submitted to the 

Illinois Historic Preservation Agency, the Illinois State Historic Preservation Officer 

(Illinois SHPO). On May 3, 2010, the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency concurred 

with the findings of the reconnaissance survey for the Wyanet Connection. The 

concurrence letter is in Attachment 9. 

2.7.1 No-Build Alternative 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

The No-Build Alternative would not result in changes to existing railroad infrastructure 

or operations. The Eola Main Line Improvements would not be constructed, and no 

passenger rail service would be added between Chicago and Iowa City. Therefore, the 

No-Build Alternative would not impact cultural resources. 

Wyanet Connection 

The No-Build Alternative would not result in changes to existing railroad infrastructure 

or operations. The Wyanet Connection would not be constructed, and no passenger rail 

service would be added between Chicago and Iowa City. Therefore, the No-Build 

Alternative would not impact cultural resources. 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

26 Service Level Environmental Assessment

2.7.2 Preferred Alternative – Two Round-trip Trains per Day 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

The Preferred Alternative would not have an impact on significant archaeological 

resources because no resources eligible for the NRHP have been identified within the 

construction limits of the Eola Main Line Improvements. 

Wyanet Connection 

The Preferred Alternative would not have an impact on cultural resources because no 

resources have been identified within 1 mile of the Wyanet Connection. 

2.7.3 Preferred Alternative – Five Round-trip Trains per Day 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

This Alternative would not have an impact on significant archaeological resources 

because no resources eligible for the NRHP have been identified within the construction 

limits of the Eola Main Line Improvements. 

Wyanet Connection 

Because no resources have been identified within the Project area or vicinity, increasing 

train traffic from two to five round-trip TPD would not impact cultural resources. 

2.8 PARKS AND NATURAL AREAS

The following information supplements Section 3.11, Parks and Federally or State-Listed 

Natural Areas, of the September 2009 Service Level EA with information on parks and 

natural areas) within 0.25 miles of the Eola Main Line Improvements and the Wyanet 

Connection. The parks that qualify for protection under Section 4(f) of the USDOT Act 

of 1966 (49 United States Code [USC] 303) are discussed further in Section 2.9, Section 

4(f) Resources. 

2.8.1 Eola Main Line Improvements 

The Eola Main Line Improvements section of the Project area is located entirely within 

BNSF ROW. There are no parks or natural areas next to this section of the Project area. 

However, there are four parks or natural areas located within 0.25 miles of the Eola Main 

Line Improvements: Asbury Park, Sutton Lake Park, Eola Road Marsh Natural Area, and 

Night Heron Marsh. The parks and natural areas are shown in Figure 2.6-1, Eola Main 

Line Improvements Environmental Constraints. 

Asbury Park is located approximately 150 feet south of Eola Yard. This 9.8-acre park is 

part of the Fox Valley Park District and includes two soccer fields, two informal ball 

fields, and a playground (Fox Valley Park District, 2010). 

Sutton Lake Park is located approximately 350 feet north of Eola Yard. This 23-acre park 

is part of the Fox Valley Park District and includes a 0.8-mile trail, a basketball court, a 

playground, an informal ball field, an informal soccer field, and water access for fishing 

(Fox Valley Park District, 2010). 

Eola Road Marsh is an Illinois Natural Areas Inventory (INAI) site located approximately 

70 feet south of Eola Yard. Eola Road Marsh has been determined to possess “high 

quality natural areas, habitats of endangered species, and other significant natural 

features” (University of Illinois Board of Trustees, 2009). 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 27

Night Heron Marsh is owned by the Forest Preserve District of DuPage County, and is 

located approximately 130 feet south of Eola Yard. The 136-acre marsh is undeveloped 

and has no amenities or parking for the public (Forest Preserve District of DuPage 

County, 2009). “Formerly cultivated farm fields, the preserve is a mix of restored prairie 

and natural wetlands, a haven for belted kingfishers, great egrets, illusive black-crowned 

night-herons, and great blue herons perching in willows” (Forest Preserve District of 

DuPage County, 2009). 

2.8.2 Wyanet Connection 

Five prairie areas were identified within the Wyanet Connection section of the Project 

area. One of these prairie areas is of high quality. Field surveys indicated that no 

federally or state-listed plant species occur in the area (see Attachment 11). In addition to 

these prairie areas within this section of the Project area, the Hennepin Canal Parkway 

State Park is located near this section. At the closest point, it is approximately 0.25 miles 

northeast of the Wyanet Connection. The prairie areas and Hennepin Canal Parkway 

State Park are shown in Figure 2.6-2, Wyanet Connection Environmental Constraints. 

There are no other parks or natural areas within 0.25 miles of the Wyanet Connection 

section of the Project area. 

The first prairie area within the Study Area is an approximately 0.35-acre native prairie 

remnant (Prairie A) on the west end of the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area. 

This area contains at least 62 different species, is of sufficient quality for listing on the 

INAI, and is limited to the area between the railroad grade and railroad ROW fence 

(Illinois Natural History Survey [INHS], July 19, 2010). This area has a high natural 

quality, rated as grade B to A-.13 The four other prairie areas within the Study Area are 

located north and west of the BNSF Railway line and north of the IAIS railroad line. 

These prairie areas are of lower quality (grade C to D). Another high quality (Grade B to 

A-) prairie area (Prairie B) is located along the south side of the IAIS tracks immediately 

east of the BNSF crossing (outside of, but adjacent to the Study Area). This 

approximately 0.10-acre prairie contains at least 46 species, is of sufficient quality for 

listing on the INAI, and is limited to the area between the railroad grade and railroad 

ROW fence (INHS, July 19, 2010). 

2.8.3 No-Build Alternative 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

The No-Build Alternative would not result in changes to existing railroad infrastructure 

or operations. The Eola Main Line Improvements would not be constructed, and no 

passenger rail service would be added between Chicago and Iowa City. Therefore, the 

No-Build Alternative would not result in impacts on Asbury Park, Sutton Lake Park, Eola 

Road Marsh Natural Area, or Night Heron Marsh. 

 

13 Natural quality is rated according to the type and quality of communities in the prairie area. Grade A 

areas consist of relatively stable or undisturbed communities, Grade B consists of late successional or 

lightly disturbed communities, Grade C consists of mid-successional or moderately to heavily disturbed 

communities, Grade D consists of early successional or severely disturbed communities, and Grade E 

consists of very early successional or very severely disturbed communities. 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

28 Service Level Environmental Assessment

Wyanet Connection 

The No-Build Alternative would not result in changes to existing railroad infrastructure 

or operations. The Wyanet Connection would not be constructed, and no passenger rail 

service would be added between Chicago and Iowa City. Therefore, the No-Build 

Alternative would not result in impacts on the prairie areas or Hennepin Canal Parkway 

State Park. 

2.8.4 Preferred Alternative - Two Round-trip Trains per Day 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

Construction of the Eola Main Line Improvements would have no direct impact on 

Asbury Park, Sutton Lake Park, Eola Road Marsh Natural Area, or Night Heron Marsh. 

Although noise and vibration levels may increase slightly, these parks and marshes are 

adjacent to what is currently a very active rail yard. Users (both human and wildlife) of 

these areas are not expected to observe a noticeable difference in noise and vibration 

levels as a result of the construction of the Eola Main Line Improvements or the 

operation of an additional two round-trip TPD through this area. The increases in noise 

and vibration would not result in an impairment of the parks and natural areas in the 

vicinity of the Eola Main Line Improvements. 

Wyanet Connection 

Construction of the Wyanet Connection would result in a direct impact on the 

approximately 0.35-acre Prairie A and would also impact the other lower quality prairie 

areas. Mitigation for these impacts would be incorporated into the overall mitigation plan 

for the relocation of Pond Creek (see Section 2.10, Waterways (Stream Relocation)). 

IDNR recommended that if the railroad prairie at Wyanet is adversely impacted, the 

impact area could be excavated and moved to a suitable site. Tree replacement could take 

place in the agricultural areas within the 7 acres that will be purchased for the project 

(IDOT, July 28, 2010). The proposed Wyanet Connection would not result in direct or 

indirect impacts on Prairie B. Although construction of the Wyanet Connection would 

move train traffic 350 feet closer to the Hennepin Canal Parkway State Park, there would 

be no direct impacts; the new track alignment and additional two TPD are expected to 

have a negligible impact on park users, as noise levels would not increase noticeably and 

the BNSF and IAIS rail lines are currently visible to park users. The increases in noise 

and vibration would not result in an impairment of the Hennepin Canal Parkway State 

Park. 

2.8.5 Preferred Alternative - Five Round-trip Trains per Day 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

The effects of running five round-trip TPD would be similar to those of operating two 

round-trip TPD, but noise and vibration levels would rise slightly from the increased train 

traffic. The increases in noise and vibration would not result in a significant impairment 

of the parks and natural areas in the vicinity of the Eola Main Line Improvements. 

Wyanet Connection 

The effects of running five round-trip TPD would be similar to those of operating two 

round-trip TPD, but noise and vibration levels would rise slightly from the increased train 

traffic. The increases in noise and vibration would not result in a significant impairment 

of the Hennepin Canal Parkway State Park. 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 29

2.9 SECTION 4(F) RESOURCES

Section 4(f) of the USDOT Act of 1966 (49 USC 303) grants special protection to four 

specific types of property. One type of protected property is historic sites, defined as 

historic properties that are listed in or eligible for inclusion in the NRHP. The other three 

types of protected properties are publicly owned parks, publicly owned refuges for 

wildlife and/or waterfowl, and publicly owned recreational areas. 

Section 4(f) forbids the Secretary of Transportation from approving projects that require 

the conversion (referred to as “use”) of land from these protected properties unless it can 

be clearly demonstrated that: “(i) There is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use 

of land from the property; and (ii) The action includes all possible planning to minimize 

harm to the property resulting from such use”; or the FRA determines that the use of the 

property, including any measure(s) to minimize harm (such as any avoidance, 

minimization, mitigation, or enhancement measures) would have a de minimis impact. A 

direct use occurs when there is a physical incorporation of land into a transportation 

facility. A constructive use occurs when a project does “not incorporate land from a 

section 4(f) resource, but the project’s proximity impacts are so severe that the protected 

activities, features, or attributes that qualify a resource for protection under section 4(f) 

are substantially impaired” and the resource can no longer perform its designated 

function (49 USC 303). 

No parks, publicly owned refuges for wildlife and/or waterfowl, or publicly owned 

recreational areas were identified during the September 2009 Service Level EA process 

or have been identified within the Eola Main Line Improvements or the Wyanet 

Connection sections of the Project area. The five prairie areas, identified in Section 2.8.2, 

within the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area are not publicly owned and are 

not eligible for protection under Section 4(f). 

Potential Section 4(f) resources were identified within approximately 0.25 miles of the 

Eola Main Line Improvements and the Wyanet Connection. Four parks or natural areas 

have been identified in the vicinity of the Eola Main Line Improvements: Asbury Park, 

Sutton Lake Park, Eola Road Marsh Natural Area, and Night Heron Marsh. These 

resources are described in more detail in Section 2.8, Parks and Natural Areas. No 

archaeological resources or historic structures were identified within the Eola Main Line 

Improvements section of the Project area. 

The only Section 4(f) resource in the vicinity of the Wyanet Connection is the Hennepin 

Canal Parkway State Park, which, at the closest point, is approximately 0.25 mile 

northeast of the Wyanet Connection. The Hennepin Canal was constructed between 1892 

and 1907 to serve barge traffic but was obsolete by the time construction was completed 

because it was between 20 and 40 feet narrower than the locks it connected (Illinois 

Department of Natural Resources [IDNR], 2010). The canal was open to boat traffic until 

1951 but has been used primarily as a recreational resource since the 1930s (IDNR, 

2010). Currently, the canal is one element of the 104.5-mile linear park that includes the 

Hennepin Canal Trail and crosses five Illinois counties. The Hennepin Canal Parkway 

State Park has a visitor center near Sheffield, Illinois, and offers picnicking, hiking, 

bicycling, fishing, boating, canoeing, camping, horseback riding, hunting, snowmobiling, 

and cross country skiing (IDNR, 2010). 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

30 Service Level Environmental Assessment

In addition to being a recreational resource, the entire Hennepin Canal is listed in the 

NRHP. It is “the first American canal built of concrete without stone cut facings,” and 

“some of the innovations pioneered on the Hennepin Canal were probably used on the 

Panama Canal” (IDNR, 2010). The canal has 33 locks, five of which have been restored 

to working condition while the rest have been replaced with concrete walls that create 

waterfalls (IDNR, 2010). 

2.9.1 No-Build Alternative 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

The No-Build Alternative would not result in changes to existing railroad infrastructure 

or operations. The Eola Main Line Improvements would not be constructed, and no 

passenger rail service would be added between Chicago and Iowa City. Therefore, the 

No-Build Alternative would not result in a direct use or proximity impacts on Section 4(f) 

resources. 

Wyanet Connection 

The No-Build Alternative would not result in changes to existing railroad infrastructure 

or operations. The Wyanet Connection would not be constructed, and no passenger rail 

service would be added between Chicago and Iowa City. Therefore, the No-Build 

Alternative would not result in a direct use or proximity impacts on Section 4(f) 

properties. 

2.9.2 Preferred Alternative - Two Round-trip Trains per Day 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

Implementation of the Preferred Alternative would necessitate the construction of the 

Eola Main Line Improvements and would result in the addition of two-round-trip 

passenger TPD through the Eola area. There would not be any direct use of Section 4(f) 

resources because no resource is next to the Eola Main Line Improvements section of the 

Project area. 

Asbury Park, Sutton Lake Park, Eola Road Marsh Natural Area, and Night Heron Marsh 

were reviewed for the potential for proximity impacts that could result in a constructive 

use. Construction of the Eola Main Line Improvements would take place entirely within 

the existing BNSF Eola Yard, an active rail yard. Train traffic would not be moved closer 

to any of the parks, as the additional main line track constructed would be located within 

the middle of the yard. Although this track may be visible from Asbury Park, Sutton Lake 

Park, Eola Road Marsh Natural Area, or Night Heron Marsh, the addition of one track 

within this large yard would not impact users of these areas. The aesthetics of the area 

would not change because the action is not introducing a new feature to the viewshed. 

Noise and vibration in the area would increase during construction but would return to 

near pre-construction levels with the operation of two additional round-trip TPD. The 

overall noise and vibration levels in the area north of Eola Yard would increase slightly, 

but no change would occur south of the yard limits. The slight increases in noise and 

vibration levels are not anticipated to affect or impair Sutton Lake Park, the only resource 

north of the Eola Main Line Improvements. The Eola Main Line Improvements are 

located in an area with major railroad operations and therefore would not result in 

ecological intrusion. Construction of the Eola Main Line Improvements would not affect 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 31

access to Asbury Park, Sutton Lake Park, Eola Road Marsh Natural Area, or Night Heron 

Marsh. 

Although five structures within the vibration and noise contour limits are of sufficient age 

to warrant additional investigation of their NRHP eligibility, none have been determined 

eligible. Any potential increase in the noise and vibration would be minor and would not 

change the basic characteristics of the noise and vibration effects the structures have been 

exposed to for over 50 years. As discussed in Section 2.4.1, Noise Assessment, and 

Section 2.4.2, Ground-borne Vibration Assessment, any changes in noise and vibration 

levels would be so minor that they would be within the modeling margin of error. Access 

to the five structures would not be altered. Although this track may be visible from these 

structures, the addition of one track within this large yard would not impact users of these 

areas. The aesthetics of the area would not change because the action is not introducing a 

new feature to the viewshed. 

Construction of the Eola Main Line Improvements would not result in a direct use or 

proximity impacts resulting in a significant impairment that would be considered a 

constructive use. 

Wyanet Connection 

Implementation of the Preferred Alternative would necessitate the construction of the 

Wyanet Connection and would result in the addition of two round-trip passenger TPD on 

the existing BNSF and IAIS rail lines. There would not be any direct use of Section 4(f) 

properties because no property is within the Wyanet Connection section of the Project 

area. 

The Hennepin Canal Parkway State Park was reviewed for the potential for proximity 

impacts that could result in a constructive use of a park and a significant historic 

resource. The construction of the Wyanet Connection would add a rail line north of the 

existing BNSF and IAIS tracks approximately 350 feet closer to Hennepin Canal 

Parkway State Park than the existing tracks. This added track, though potentially visible 

from the Hennepin Canal Parkway State Park, would have a negligible effect on 

recreational users and would not impact the historic designation of the canal, as there are 

already train tracks and train traffic in the vicinity on the existing rail lines. The aesthetics 

of the area would not change because the action is not introducing a new feature to the 

viewshed. Noise and vibration in the area would increase during construction but would 

return to near pre-construction levels with the operation of the two additional round-trip 

TPD. The overall noise and vibration levels in the area would increase slightly but would 

not affect the Hennepin Canal Parkway State Park except for subtle increases where the 

BNSF rail line crosses the Hennepin Canal. Construction of the Wyanet Connection 

would not affect access to the Hennepin Canal Parkway State Park. 

Construction of the Wyanet Connection would not result in a direct use or proximity 

impacts resulting in a significant impairment of Hennepin Canal Parkway State Park that 

would be considered a constructive use of a park or significant historic resource. 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

32 Service Level Environmental Assessment

2.9.3 Preferred Alternative - Five Round-trip Trains per Day 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

The effects of running five round-trip TPD would be similar to those of operating two 

round-trip TPD, but noise and vibration levels would rise slightly from the increased train 

traffic. The increases in noise and vibration would not result in a constructive use of the 

parks, natural areas, or any potentially NRHP-eligible structures in the vicinity of the 

Eola Main Line Improvements. 

Wyanet Connection 

The effects of running five round-trip TPD would be similar to those of operating two 

round-trip TPD, but noise and vibration levels would rise slightly from the increased train 

traffic. The increases in noise and vibration would not result in a constructive use of the 

Hennepin Canal Parkway State Park. 

2.10 WATERWAYS (STREAM RELOCATION) 

Waterways include rivers, perennial streams, and intermittent streams. According to 

current Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdictional guidance, a waterway is subject to CWA 

jurisdiction if the waterway is any of the following (EPA and USACE, December 2, 

2008): 

• A traditional navigable water, which would include all the waters described in 

33 CFR 328.3(a)(1) and 40 CFR 230.3(s)(1) 

• A non-navigable, relatively permanent tributary of a traditional navigable 

water, where the tributary typically flows year-round or has continuous flow 

at least seasonally (typically three months) 

• A non-navigable tributary that is not relatively permanent, but that does 

contain a significant nexus toward benefiting the chemical, physical, and/or 

biological integrity of downstream traditional navigable waters 

Waterways were documented during a field survey in July 2010 and a technical 

memorandum was prepared assessing the waterways present in the Eola Main Line 

Improvements section of the Project area (Attachment 5). This section of the Project area 

is within the Lower Fox River, hydrologic unit code (HUC) 8 (07120007), within the 

Town of Aurora sub-basin HUC 12 (071200070107). Aquatic resources within and 

surrounding it include the perennial southern branch of Indian Creek to the south; several 

perennial to intermittent, channelized and underground stormwater conveyances (upper 

headwaters of Indian Creek); Eola and Night Heron Marshes to the southeast; and several 

stormwater detention ponds to the north. These linear conveyances within the survey area 

of the Eola Main Line Improvements section connect upstream and offsite Eola and 

Night Heron Marsh, and several stormwater ponds, downstream to the southern branch of 

Indian Creek and subsequently to the Fox River. 

The southern branch of Indian Creek can be characterized as a typical Midwestern 

headwater stream that has been heavily influenced by regional suburban and urban 

development, as well as industrial-commercial development. Within the Eola Main Line 

Improvements section, aquatic resources are highly channelized to form an 

interconnected drainage network, which conveys stormwater—generated from both onand offsite locations–downstream. These linear features have a mixture of perennial, 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 33

intermittent, and ephemeral flow regimes. The survey limits used for the field observation 

in July 2010 include approximately 2,200 linear feet of stream of the southern branch of 

Indian Creek, and two parallel stormwater conveyances (headwaters of Indian Creek) that 

consist of approximately 14,500 combined linear feet or 7,100 and 7,400 linear feet, 

respectively. Total estimated stream/stormwater conveyances within the survey limits of 

the Eola Main Line Improvements section include approximately 16,700 linear feet. 

Pond Creek is present within the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area. Pond 

Creek, located in the Pond Creek-Big Bureau Creek sub-basin HUC 12 (071300013), is a 

perennial stream that generally flows from west to east. The creek is a tributary of the 

Hennepin Canal and is heavily channelized upstream and downstream of this section of 

the Project area. Within the boundary of this section of the Project area, Pond Creek is 

entrenched and has steep slopes (INHS, May 5, 2010).The primary land use adjacent to 

the stream is agriculture, but the riparian zone within this section of the Project area is 

mostly forested. A field survey of Pond Creek was conducted in July 2010 and the results 

are documented in Attachment 6. 

2.10.1 No-Build Alternative 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

The No-Build Alternative would not result in changes to existing railroad infrastructure 

or operations. The Eola Main Line Improvements would not be constructed, and no 

passenger rail service would be added between Chicago and Iowa City. Therefore, the 

No-Build Alternative would not impact any waterways within the Project area. 

Wyanet Connection 

The No-Build Alternative would not result in changes to the existing railroad 

infrastructure or operations. The Wyanet Connection would not be constructed, and no 

passenger rail service would be added between Chicago and Iowa City. Therefore, the 

No-Build Alternative would not impact any waterways within the Wyanet Connection 

section of the Project area. 

2.10.2 Preferred Alternative - Two Round-trip Trains per Day 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

For the Preferred Alternative - two round-trip TPD scenario, construction of the proposed 

connection would require a portion (approximately 4,920 linear feet) of linear 

conveyances to be filled and relocated to a culvert or enclosed conduit. This direct effect 

would result in an alternation of the current stream and stormwater conveyances. Aquatic 

communities, including fish, amphibians, and invertebrates, would be affected by the loss 

of habitat. 

Mitigation for the potential impacts on the stormwater drainage features could be 

accomplished through a combination of on- and offsite restoration. Preliminary analysis 

of onsite mitigation alternatives was limited due to anthropogenic constraints and the 

existing use of the section as a railway yard. Onsite mitigation would include replacement 

of the affected stormwater channels by enclosed conduits, which would maintain the 

hydraulic capacity and connectivity. 

Additional, offsite mitigation could include enhancement of the up-stream Eola and Night 

Heron Marshes and could include downstream aquatic habitat within the southern branch 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

34 Service Level Environmental Assessment

of Indian Creek. Enhancing aquatic habitat throughout Indian Creek (using in-stream 

treatments such as cross veins, J-hooks, porous weirs, Newberry riffles, or root wads) 

would create a more diverse aquatic ecosystem. These structures would be strategically 

located throughout the creek to optimize their effect on scour and deposition along the 

creek. Installation of channel treatments would enhance stream substrate and aid in the 

development of riffle–pool sequencing to restore a more natural width-to-depth ratio. 

Additionally, exotic plant species (reed canary grass, buckthorn, and honeysuckle) along 

Indian Creek would be removed and native herbaceous and woody wetland vegetation 

would be planted to help restore the stream corridor. 

IDOT and IDNR met on July 27, 2010 to discuss general concept-level mitigation. IDNR 

concurred with the general mitigations, understanding that detailed, site-specific 

mitigation plans would be developed during the tier 2 project level EA (see Attachment 

9). 

The next step in the development process would be to conduct further tier 2 project level 

NEPA review of the various project elements. The NEPA review would include the full 

range of alternatives evaluation, impact assessment, and mitigation development, 

including permit applications. It is important to note that the detailed engineering and 

alternatives analysis would be performed concurrent with the NEPA process. In 

accordance with Section 404 of the CWA, permits issued by USACE include mandatory 

conditions to mitigate impacts of a proposed action. Mitigations developed for the project 

would be consistent with these regulatory requirements. Therefore, coordination with all 

appropriate federal and state agencies, including IDNR and USACE, would occur to 

identify the best alternatives to avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts on aquatic resource 

features. 

Wyanet Connection 

Construction of the Wyanet Connection would require approximately 2,050 linear feet of 

Pond Creek to be filled and relocated. This direct effect would result in alternation of the 

current stream channel and temporary loss of stream habitat. The loss of habitat would 

impact aquatic communities, including fish, amphibians, and invertebrates. As the 

railroad embankment is constructed, a new channel would be excavated north of the new 

embankment. 

Indirect effects include impacts both upstream and downstream of the channel relocation. 

Indirect effects upstream of the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area include 

impacts on aquatic organism movement and disruption of the current hydrological 

regime. Construction of the Wyanet Connection may also result in downstream impacts 

on biota and habitat. During construction, changes in the hydrological flow may cause 

indirect effects on downstream habitat. 

Mitigation for the impacts on Pond Creek could be accomplished by a combination of 

restoration options, including on-site replacement of the current functions of Pond Creek 

through development of a more natural channel, off-site enhancement of downstream 

habitat within the Pond Creek watershed, on-site wetland development within a newly 

developed riparian corridor, and purchase of stream/wetland mitigation credits from an 

approved mitigation bank within the service area. Attachment 6 describes Pond Creek 

and the conceptual mitigation for potential impacts in more detail. 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 35

IDOT and IDNR met on July 27, 2010 to discuss general concept-level mitigation. IDNR 

concurred with the general mitigations. All possible alternatives to avoid, minimize, and 

compensate for any impacts on Pond Creek, consistent with IDNR and USACE 

permitting requirements, would be fully evaluated and all appropriate permits would be 

obtained during the tier 2 project level NEPA review (see Attachment 9). 

2.10.3 Preferred Alternative - Five Round-trip Trains per Day 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

For the Preferred Alternative - five round-trip TPD scenario, impacts would be the same 

as for the two round-trip TPD scenario. 

Wyanet Connection 

For the Preferred Alternative - five round-trip TPD scenario, impacts would be the same 

as for the two round-trip TPD scenario. 

2.11 WETLANDS

Waters of the U.S., including wetlands, waterways, lakes, natural ponds, and 

impoundments are regulated by USACE under Section 404 of the CWA, which requires a 

permit to authorize the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S. 

(33 USC 1344). 

USACE-Chicago District has jurisdiction over wetlands potentially affected by the Eola 

Main Line Improvements section of the Project area. Illinois EPA is responsible for 

Section 401 Water Quality Certification for any project requiring a federal permit or 

license that includes a discharge into a water of the state. 

The survey limits for the Eola Main Line Improvements were evaluated for wetlands in 

July 2010 (HDR, 2010). Wetlands within the survey limits include perennial to 

intermittent, channelized, and underground stormwater conveyances (upper waters of 

Indian Creek); palustrine emergent (PEM) wetland, and palustrine forested (PFO) 

wetland. The PEM wetland located on the western edge of the survey limits is an erosion 

ditch that flows into the storm sewer system. The PFO wetland was located on the eastern 

edge of the survey limits along the southern edge of the existing main tracks. The linear 

conveyances of Indian Creek were discussed further in Section 2.10, Waterways (Stream 

Relocation). 

Table 2.11-1 

Wetlands within Survey Limits 

Wetlands Areas within Survey Limits (acres) 

PFO 0.4 

Linear featuresa 7.9 

PEM 0.1 

Total Wetlands 8.4 

Source: HDR, 2010. Wetland Determination Technical Memo 

Note: 

a

 Areas include culvert system that flows beneath the rail lines 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

36 Service Level Environmental Assessment

In addition to the wetland observation within the survey limits, surrounding wetland areas 

were noted during the field visit and a desktop analysis was conducted (Figure 2.6-1, 

Eola Main Line Improvements Environmental Constraints). 

The Wyanet Connection section of the Project area was evaluated for wetlands in April 

2010 (INHS, May 5, 2010). One 4.4-acre palustrine, emergent, semipermanently flooded 

(PEMF) wetland area was delineated on the northeastern part of this section of the Project 

area. This wetland was the only National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) wetland mapped for 

the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area (Figure 2.6-2, Wyanet Connection 

Environmental Constraints). 

2.11.1 No-Build Alternative 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

The No-Build Alternative would not result in changes to the existing railroad 

infrastructure or operations. The Eola Main Line Improvements would not be 

constructed, and no passenger rail service would be added between Chicago and Iowa 

City. Therefore, the No-Build Alternative would not affect wetlands within the Eola 

Mainline Improvements section of the Project area. 

Wyanet Connection 

The No-Build Alternative would not result in changes to the existing railroad 

infrastructure or operations. The Wyanet Connection would not be constructed, and no 

passenger rail service would be added between Chicago and Iowa City. Therefore, the 

No-Build Alternative would not affect wetlands within the Wyanet Connection section of 

the Project area. 

2.11.2 Preferred Alternative - Two Round-trip Trains per Day 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

Construction of the proposed Eola Main Line Improvements would impact approximately 

1.7 acres of wetlands based on preliminary design. This direct effect would alter the 

current stream and stormwater conveyances. 

Mitigation for the Eola Main Line Improvements could occur on site or off site. Onsite 

mitigation would include replacement of the affected stormwater channels where 

practical. Additional, offsite mitigation could include enhancement of upstream Eola and 

Night Heron Marshes. Detailed, site-specific mitigation plans would be developed during 

the tier 2 project level NEPA analysis. The tier 2 project level EA would include a full 

range of alternatives, impact assessment, and mitigation development, including permit 

applications. Therefore, coordination with all appropriate federal and state agencies, 

including IDNR, would occur to identify the best alternatives to avoid, minimize, and 

mitigate impacts on wetland resources. 

Wyanet Connection 

The two-round trip TPD scenario would not impact the 4.4 acre PEMF wetland site 

within the northeastern part of the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area. The 

existing alignment would be used within the wetland area. Any potential temporary 

impacts would be minimized by using best management practices (BMPs) and by 

following state standards for any culvert placement or replacement within this section of 

the Project area. 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 37

2.11.3 Preferred Alternative - Five Round-trip Trains per Day 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

For the five round-trip TPD scenario, impacts would be the same as for the two 

round-trip TPD scenario. 

Wyanet Connection 

For the five round-trip TPD scenario, impacts would be the same as for the two 

round-trip TPD scenario. 

2.12 WATER QUALITY

Surface water is protected through several acts and regulations. Impacts on water 

resources are evaluated in accordance with CWA (33 USC 1251 et seq.) and Executive 

Order (EO) 12088, Federal Compliance with Pollution Control Standards (published at 

43 FR 477707). 

The Eola Main Line Improvements section of the Project area is located within the Lower 

Fox River Watershed, which covers a total of 701,195 acres in Kane, DuPage, DeKalb, 

Kendall, and LaSalle counties (Illinois EPA, 2010a). The major stream in this watershed 

is the Fox River, located east of the Eola Main Line Improvements section of the Project 

area. Within the proposed improvements, several unnamed drainages of Indian Creek 

flow parallel to each other and south, crossing the western extent of this section of the 

Project area through a culvert system. The drainages flow into Indian Creek, which 

continues west, flowing into the Fox River. Water resources adjacent to this section of the 

Project area also include several detention areas and marshes that provide natural 

treatment and retention of stormwater runoff from residential areas. 

Water quality of streams within Illinois can be assessed by consulting the Illinois EPA 

Integrated Water Quality Report and Section 303(d) list of Impaired Waters (Illinois 

EPA, 2010b). According to the 2010 303(d) list, Indian Creek was not assessed as part of 

the study. The Fox River (HUC 072100701) was assessed for use attainment and was not 

supporting aquatic life, fish consumption, public and food processing water supplies, and 

primary contact. See the following table. 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 38

Table 2.12-1 

2010 Illinois EPA 303(d) List – Specific Assessment information for Fox River 

Name Assessment 

Unit ID 

10-Digit 

HUC 

Illinois 

EPA 

Basin 

Cat. Size 

(miles) 

Use 

Attainmenta Causes Sources 

Fox River IL_DT-03 0712000701 4 5 7.39 N582, N583, 

N585, X586, 

X590 

Aldrin, other flow regime alterations, 

dissolved oxygen, 

sedimentation/siltation, total suspended 

solids (TSS), total phosphorus, aquatic 

algae, mercury, polychlorinated 

biphenyls, fecal coliform 

Contaminated sediments, impacts from 

hydrostructure flow 

regulations/modification, dam or 

impoundment, agriculture, urban 

runoff/storm sewers, municipal point 

discharges, toxics, source unknown

Fox River IL_DT-09 0712000701 4 5 8.11 N582, N583, 

N585, X586, 

X590 

Alteration in stream-side or littoral 

vegetative cover, hexachlorobenzene, 

methocychlor, other flow regime 

alterations, total phosphorus, aquatic 

algae, polychlorinated biphenyls, fecal 

coliform 

Streambank 

modification/destabilization, 

contaminated sediments, impacts from 

hdyrostructure flow 

regulation/modification, dam or 

impoundment, municipal point 

discharges, source unknown, combined 

sewer overflows, urban runoff/storm 

sewers 

Fox River IL_DT-38 0712000701 4 5 10.83 N582, N583, 

N584, N585, 

X586, X590 

Alteration in stream-side or littoral 

vegetative cover, other flow regime 

alterations, TSS, total phosphorus, 

aquatic algae, mercury, polychlorinated 

biphenyls, chloride, fecal coliform

Streambank 

modification/destabilization, impacts 

from hydrostructure flow 

regulations/modification, dam or 

impoundment, combined sewer 

overflows, urban runoff/storm sewers, 

municipal point discharges, toxics, 

source unknown

Fox River IL_DT-58 0712000701 4 5 3.74 N582, N583, 

X585, X586, 

X590 

Alteration in stream-side or littoral 

vegetation covers, other flow regime 

alterations, dissolved oxygen, mercury, 

polychlorinated biphenyls 

Streambank 

modification/destabilization, impacts 

from hydrostructure flow 

regulation/modification, toxics, source 

unknown

Notes: 

a

 N= not supporting; X = not assessed; 582 = not supporting aquatic life; 583 = fish consumption; 584 = public and food processing water supplies; 

585 = primary contact. 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 39

For the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area, as discussed in Attachment 6, 

according to the 2010 303(d) list, Pond Creek was not assessed as part of the 2010 that 

report (Illinois EPA 2010b). West Bureau Creek was assessed as fully supporting aquatic 

life and not supporting primary contact for fecal coliform. The source of the fecal 

coliform impairment is unknown. See the following table. 

Table 2.12-2 

2010 Illinois EPA 303(d) List – Specific Assessment Information for Pond Creek 

Name Assessment 

Unit ID 

10-Digit 

HUC 

Illinois 

EPA 

Basin 

Cat. Size 

(miles) 

Use 

Attainmenta Causesb Sourcesc

Pond 

Creek IL_DQDA 0713000107 11 3 10.16 

X582, X583, 

X585, X586, 

X590 

N/A N/A 

West 

Bureau 

Creek 

IL_DQD-01 0713000104 11 5 23.57 

F582, X583, 

N585, X586, 

X590 

400 140 

Notes: 

a X = not assessed; F = fully supporting; N = not supporting; 582 = primary contact; 583 = fish consumption; 

585 = aquatic life; 586 =secondary contact; 590 = aesthetic quality. 

b

 N/A = not applicable; 400 = above threshold for supporting primary contact for fecal coliform. 

b

 140 = source of fecal coliform unknown. 

The alterations to Pond Creek may affect water quality. Impacts both upstream and 

downstream of the channel relocation would occur during construction and relocation of 

the channel. Section 2.10, Waterways (Stream Relocation), describes the nature of the 

anticipated impacts to waterways which have the potential to impact water quality. 

The major potential causes of impairment within Illinois streams are fecal coliform 

bacteria impairing swimming (582-primary contact) use, mercury and polychlorinated 

biphenyls (PCBs) in fish tissue impairing (583-fish consumption) use, and low dissolved 

oxygen, high nutrients, excessive siltation, physical habitat alterations, and high 

suspended solids which impair (585-aquatic life) use (Illinois EPA, 2010). 

A tier 2 project level NEPA document would be developed as part of the process. During 

the tier 2 project level evaluation, environmental surveys would be conducted at a more 

defined scale. A detailed alternative analysis would also be completed to determine if any 

further avoidance or minimization of impacts could occur. All possible alternatives to 

avoid, minimize, and compensate for any impacts on Pond Creek would be fully 

evaluated, and all appropriate permits would be obtained after completion of the tier 2 

project level NEPA document. 

2.12.1 No-Build Alternative 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

The No-Build Alternative would not result in changes to existing railroad infrastructure 

or operations. The Eola Main Line Improvements would not be constructed, and no 

passenger rail service would be added between Chicago and Iowa City. Therefore, the 

No-Build Alternative would not affect current water quality within the Eola Main Line 

Improvements section of the Project area. 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

40 Service Level Environmental Assessment

Wyanet Connection 

The No-Build Alternative would not result in changes to existing railroad infrastructure 

or operations. The Wyanet Connection would not be constructed, and no passenger rail 

service would be added between Chicago and Iowa City. Therefore, the No-Build 

Alternative would not affect water quality within the Wyanet Connection section of the 

Project area. 

2.12.2 Preferred Alternative - Two Round-trip Trains per Day 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

No permanent water quality impacts are anticipated for the Eola Main Line 

Improvements. Temporary impacts would occur from the realignment of drainages and 

placement of any culverts along the new alignment. Temporary impacts on water quality 

would cease after construction was completed. Temporary impacts on water resources 

would be minimized by the use of BMPs. Discharge of stormwater during construction 

would be addressed under National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) 

permitting and with BMPs. Furthermore, Section 401 quality certifications for 

construction would be obtained from Illinois. 

Construction of the Eola Main Line Improvements is expected to result in the disturbance 

of 1 or more acres of total land area and, accordingly, is subject to the requirement for an 

NPDES permit for stormwater discharges from the construction sites. Permit coverage 

would be obtained either under the Illinois EPA General Permit for Stormwater 

Discharges from Construction Site Activities (NPDES Permit No. ILR10) or under an 

individual NPDES permit. Requirements applicable to such a permit would be followed, 

including the preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Such a plan shall 

identify potential sources of pollution which may reasonably be expected to affect the 

quality of stormwater discharges from the construction site, and shall describe and ensure 

the implementation of practices which would be used to reduce the pollutants in 

discharges associated with construction site activity and to ensure compliance with the 

terms of the permit. 

Operation and maintenance activities along the Eola Main Line Improvements section 

would be similar to activities along the rest of the proposed alignment. Possible negative 

effects of improper maintenance include erosion and siltation and the overuse or spill of 

herbicides. The risks for these potential effects on the Eola Main Line Improvements 

would be similar to those for the rest of the proposed alignment. 

Construction of the Eola Main Line Improvements is not expected to create any new 

pathways for groundwater pollution or any new potential sources of groundwater 

pollution, as defined in the Illinois Environmental Protection Act (415 Illinois compiled 

Statutes [ILCS] 5/3 et seq.). Accordingly, the Eola Main Line Improvements are not 

subject to compliance with the minimum setback requirements for community water 

supply wells or other potable water supply wells as set forth in 415 ILCS 5/14 et seq. 

Wyanet Connection 

The two-round trip TPD scenario is not expected to result in permanent water quality 

impacts in the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area. Temporary impacts would 

occur from stream realignment and placement of any culverts along the new alignment. 

Temporary impacts on water quality would cease after construction was completed. 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 41

Temporary impacts on water resources would be minimized by the use of BMPs. 

Discharge of stormwater during construction would be addressed under NPDES 

permitting and with BMPs. Furthermore, Section 401water quality certifications for 

construction would be obtained from Illinois EPA. 

Construction of the Wyanet Connection is expected to result in the disturbance of 1 or 

more acres of total land area and, accordingly, is subject to the requirement for an 

NPDES permit for stormwater discharges from the construction sites. Permit coverage 

would be obtained either under the Illinois EPA General Permit for Stormwater 

Discharges from Construction Site Activities (NPDES Permit No. ILR10) or under an 

individual NPDES permit. Requirements applicable to such a permit would be followed, 

including the preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Such a plan shall 

identify potential sources of pollution which may reasonably be expected to affect the 

quality of stormwater discharges from the construction site and shall describe and ensure 

the implementation of practices which would be used to reduce the pollutants in 

discharges associated with construction site activity and to ensure compliance with the 

terms of the permit. Operation and maintenance activities along the Wyanet Connection 

would be similar to those for the remainder of the proposed alignment. Possible negative 

effects of improper maintenance include erosion and siltation and the overuse or spill of 

herbicides. The risks of these potential effects on the Wyanet Connection section of the 

Project area would be similar to the rest of the proposed alignment. 

Construction of the Wyanet Connection is not expected to create new pathways for 

groundwater pollution or any new potential sources of groundwater pollution, as defined 

in the Illinois Environmental Protection Act (415 ILCS 5/3 et seq.). Accordingly, the 

Wyanet Connection is not subject to compliance with the minimum setback requirements 

for community water supply wells or other potable water supply wells as set forth in 

415 ILCS 5/14 et seq. 

2.12.3 Five Round-trip Trains per Day 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

Implementation of the ultimate service level envisioned by the Midwest Regional Rail 

Initiative (MWRRI) (five round-trip TPD) would result in the same impacts on water 

quality as those for the two round-trip TPD scenario. However, when capacity is 

increased from two to five round-trip TPD, additional trains on the track may slightly 

increase the risk of any hazardous material spills. 

Wyanet Connection 

Implementation of the ultimate service level envisioned by the MWRRI (five round-trip 

TPD) would result in the same temporary impacts on water quality during construction of 

the Wyanet Connection as the two round-trip TPD scenario. However, when capacity is 

increased from two to five round-trip TPD, additional trains on the track may slightly 

increase the risk of any hazardous material spills. 

2.13 FLOODPLAINS

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has mapped floodplains and a 

floodway for Indian Creek and the South Tributary of Indian Creek in Kane and Du Page 

counties within the Eola Main Line Improvements section of the Project area as shown on 

the current FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FEMA, August 3, 2009; FEMA, 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

42 Service Level Environmental Assessment

December 16, 2004). Portions of these streams have been designated as Zone A and Zone 

AE. Zone A is defined as areas with a 1 percent annual chance of flooding in which no 

base flood elevations have been determined and no floodway has been defined. Zone AE 

is defined as areas with a 1 percent annual chance of flooding where base flood 

elevations are provided and a floodway is defined. The Illinois State Water Survey has 

classified Indian Creek as at high risk for flooding (Illinois State Water Survey, June 

2008). Within the Eola Main Line Improvements section of the Project area, floodplain 

boundaries include approximately 2,300 feet of the existing main line tracks. 

FEMA has mapped floodplains for Pond Creek within the Wyanet section of the Project 

area and Hennepin Canal near this section of the Project area (FEMA, June 15, 1984). 

Both of these streams have been designated as Zone A as shown on the current FEMA 

Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FEMA, June 15, 1984). Zone A is defined as areas with a 1 

percent annual chance of flooding in which no base flood elevations have been 

determined and no floodway has been defined. The Illinois State Water Survey has 

classified Pond Creek as a low risk for flooding (Illinois State Water Survey, June 2008). 

Within the Project area, approximately 2,100 feet of the existing IAIS line is within the 

floodplain; the railroad track is built up about 15 feet above the floodplain. 

2.13.1 No-Build Alternative 

Eola Main Line 

The No-Build Alternative would not result in changes to existing railroad infrastructure 

or operations. The Eola Main Line Improvements would not be constructed, and no 

passenger rail service would be added between Chicago and Iowa City. Therefore, 

floodplains would not be affected within the Eola Main Line Improvements section of the 

Project area. 

Wyanet Connection 

The No Build Alternative would not result in changes to existing railroad infrastructure 

or operations. The Wyanet Connection would not be constructed, and no passenger rail 

service would be added between Chicago and Iowa City. Therefore, floodplains would 

not be affected within the Eola Main Line Improvements section of the Project area. 

2.13.2 Preferred Alternative - Two Round-trip Trains per Day 

Eola Main Line 

The Eola Main Line Improvements would be constructed if the Preferred Alternative is 

selected. Approximately 2,300 feet of the 13,500-foot main line improvements would be 

constructed in the existing floodplain. Construction of the crossover track at West Eola 

would intersect approximately 160 feet of the Indian Creek floodplain. Approximately 

500 feet of existing track would be removed from the floodplain near the southern edge 

of Eola Yard east of McClure Road. Approximately 4,920 feet of the stormwater 

conveyances would be relocated to construct the proposed Eola Main Line Improvements 

(see Section 2.10, Waterways (Stream Relocation)). The floodway of Indian Creek and 

the South Tributary of Indian Creek would not be affected. Impacts on the stream and 

floodplain would be mitigated as the design process advances and would be further 

assessed in a tier 2 project level EA. A floodplain permit from Kane and Du Page 

counties would be required (Du Page County Department of Economic Development and 

Planning, August 1, 2008; Kane County Stormwater Management, January 1, 2005). 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 43

The new stream channels would be designed in accordance with regulatory requirements 

(as specified in 17 Illinois Administrative Code 3706) for flood heights, flood velocities, 

average channel velocity, and prevention of scour, erosion, and sedimentation. The length 

and location of the proposed relocation of the South Tributary of Indian Creek and 

associated drainage conveyances would be determined during the design process. In 

accordance with 17 Illinois Administrative Code 3706, the proposed Eola Main Line 

Improvements would be elevated at least 1.0 foot above the base flood elevation. 

Hydraulic modeling would be performed to verify that the proposed construction would 

not cause more than 0.1 foot rise from the existing 100-year water surface profile to meet 

the requirements for an urban area, as specified in 17 Illinois Administrative Code 

3700.60. In accordance with FEMA guidelines (44 CFR 70), a letter of map revision 

would be submitted to FEMA for approval. 

The modifications to drainage structures included in the Eola Main Line Improvements 

Project would result in an insignificant change in their capacity to carry flood water. This 

change would cause a minimal increase in flood heights and flood limits. These minimal 

increases would not result in any significant adverse impacts on the natural and beneficial 

flood plain values; they would not result in any significant change in flood risks or 

damage; and they do not have significant potential for interruption or termination of 

emergency service or emergency evacuation routes; therefore, it has been determined that 

this encroachment is not significant. 

Wyanet Connection 

The Wyanet Connection would be constructed if the Preferred Alternative is selected. 

Approximately 2,400 feet of the 4,000-foot connection would be constructed in the 

existing floodplain. Approximately 2,050 feet of Pond Creek would be relocated to 

construct the proposed Wyanet Connection (see Section 2.10.2). The drainage area of 

Pond Creek upstream of the Project area is more than 10 square miles; in accordance with 

17 Illinois Administrative Code 3700 and 3706, an IDNR floodplain permit would be 

needed to relocate the stream and construct the Wyanet Connection. After the floodplain 

permit is reviewed by the state, a copy of the permit would be sent to the Bureau County 

Emergency Service and Disaster Administration for their review. The county’s 

requirements are based on state requirements (Bureau County, July 2, 2010). The new 

stream channel would be designed in accordance with regulatory requirements (as 

specified in 17 Illinois Administrative Code 3700 and 3706) for flood heights, flood 

velocities, average channel velocity, and prevention of scour, erosion, and sedimentation. 

The length and location of the proposed relocation of Pond Creek would be determined 

during the design process. In accordance with 17 Illinois Administrative Code 3706, the 

Wyanet Connection would be elevated above the base flood elevation; Pond Creek would 

flow through a culvert under the Connection. Hydraulic modeling would be performed to 

verify that the proposed construction would not cause more than 0.5 foot rise from the 

existing 100-year water surface profile to meet the requirements for a rural area, as 

specified in 17 Illinois Administrative Code 3700.60. In accordance with FEMA 

guidelines (44 CFR 70), a letter of map revision would be submitted to FEMA for 

approval. 

The modifications to drainage structures included in the Wyanet Connection project 

would result in an insignificant change in their capacity to carry flood water. This change 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

44 Service Level Environmental Assessment

would cause a minimal increase in flood heights and flood limits. These minimal 

increases would not result in any significant adverse impacts on the natural and beneficial 

flood plain values; they would not result in any significant change in flood risks or 

damage; and they do not have significant potential for interruption or termination of 

emergency service or emergency evacuation routes; therefore, it has been determined that 

this encroachment is not significant. 

2.13.3 Preferred Alternative - Five Round-Trip Trains per Day 

Eola Main Line 

The effects of running five round-trip TPD would be similar to the conditions for the two 

round-trip TPD operations. Impacts on the floodplain from constructing the Eola Main 

Line Improvements would be the same as under the two round-trip TPD scenario. 

Wyanet Connection 

The effects of running five round-trip TPD would be similar to the conditions for the two 

round-trip TPD operations. Impacts on the floodplain from constructing the Wyanet 

Connection would be the same as under the two round-trip TPD scenario. 

2.14 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES

This section describes the potential presence of threatened and endangered species in or 

near the Eola Main Line Improvements. The potential presence of threatened and 

endangered species in or near the Wyanet Connection was addressed in Section 3.17, 

Threatened and Endangered Species, of the September 2009 Service Level EA. In July 

2010, INHS completed a preliminary assessment of the prairie remnants in the vicinity of 

the Wyanet Connection (Attachment 11), described in Section 2.8, Parks and Natural 

Areas. The INHS survey indicates there are no federally or state-listed species present. 

Detailed site-specific botanical surveys for federally and state-listed species would be 

conducted during the tier 2 project level evaluation process. 

The U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16 USC 1531 et seq.) is the primary 

legislation that provides protections to threatened and endangered species in the United 

States. The ESA is administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), which has 

a key responsibility in managing species designations and protections granted under the ESA. 

As defined by the ESA, endangered refers to species that are "in danger of extinction within 

the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of [their] range," while 

threatened refers to “those animals and plants likely to become endangered within the 

foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of their ranges” (16 USC 1531 et 

seq.). Plant species and varieties (including fungi and lichens), animal species and 

subspecies, and vertebrate animal populations are eligible for listing under the ESA. 

State regulatory agencies can grant additional protection to federally listed species or 

designate protection to other species with a range within the state. The Illinois 

Endangered Species Board advises IDNR on state-listed threatened and endangered 

species. 

In addition to ESA protection, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and 

Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) were implemented to offer protection to avian 

species. The MBTA makes it unlawful to pursue, hunt, take, capture, kill, or sell 

migratory birds. BGEPA prohibits anyone, without a permit issued by the Secretary of 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 45

the Interior, from taking bald eagles, including their parts, nests, or eggs. BGEPA 

provides criminal penalties for persons who "take, possess, sell, purchase, barter, offer to 

sell, purchase or barter, transport, export or import, at any time or any manner, any bald 

eagle ... [or any golden eagle], alive or dead, or any part, nest, or egg thereof." This also 

pertains to impacts that result from human-induced alterations initiated around a 

previously used nest site during a time when eagles are not present, if, upon the eagle's 

return, such alterations agitate or bother an eagle to a degree that interferes with or 

interrupts normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering habits, and causes injury, death or nest 

abandonment. Impacts on migratory birds, bald eagles, and golden eagles would be 

evaluated further in the tier 2 project level NEPA documents. The primary means for 

mitigating potential impacts on migratory birds, bald eagles, and golden eagles would be 

scheduling construction to minimize impacts. 

2.14.1 Two Round-Trip Trains per Day 

Eight federally listed endangered, threatened, or candidate species are identified as 

occurring within DuPage and Kane Counties. Three species are state-listed within the 

Eola Main Line Improvements section of the Project area. Table 2.14-1 summarizes those 

species and their status. A survey to characterize the affected environment for aquatic 

resources was conducted June 30, 2010. Habitat for these species is not likely present 

within the Eola Main Line Improvements section of the Project area (HDR, 2010). This 

section of the Project area is a rail yard for BNSF railroad, and the surface is primarily 

covered with gravel or trackage and its associated elements (such as ties and ballast). The 

Eola Main Line Improvements would impact one perennial drainage feature, which flows 

through the yard; however, the drainage feature is heavily channelized, contains little to 

no riparian buffer, and provides little habitat for wildlife. Night Heron Marsh and Eola 

Road Marsh, two protected natural areas adjacent to Eola Yard, may contain habitat for 

some protected species. Noise and disturbance from construction of the new main line 

track is anticipated to have little effect on these areas as heavy traffic is commonplace for 

the yard. 

Table 2.14-1 

Federally Listed or Candidates for Listing Threatened and Endangered Species 

within the Eola Main Line Improvements Section of the Project Area 

Common Name Scientific Name Status General Habitat Type 

Prairie Bush Clover Lespedeza leptostachya Threatened Native prairie 

Eastern Prairie 

Fringed Orchid 

Platanthera leucophaea Threatened Wet or mesic prairie 

Indiana Bat Myotis sodalist Endangered Edge of hardwood forests (summer) 

mines/caves (winter) 

Sheepnose Mussel Plethobasus cyphyus Candidate Medium to large rivers with sand or 

gravel substrate 

Eastern Massasauga Sistrurus c. catenatus Candidate Wet prairies 

Hine’s Emerald 

Dragonfly 

Somatochlora hineana Endangered Calcareous spring-fed marshes and 

sedge meadows 

Leafy-prairie Clover Dalea foliosa Endangered Prairie remnants along the Des Plains 

River in Illinois 

Mead’s Milkweed Asclepias meadii Threatened Mesic to dry mesic upland tallgrass 

prairie 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

46 Service Level Environmental Assessment

Common Name Scientific Name Status General Habitat Type 

Yellow-headed 

Blackbird 

Xanthocephalus 

xanthocephalus 

State 

Endangered 

Prairie wetlands, usually dominated 

by cattail. 

Common Moorhen Gallinula chloropus State 

Endangered 

Large areas of open water 

Black Crowned 

Night Heron 

Nycticorax nycticorax State 

Endangered 

Marshes, ponds, streams or rivers; 

avoiding open, exposed areas 

Source: http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/lists/illinois-cty.html 

The potential effects that the operation of the new passenger rail service would have on 

any threatened, endangered, or candidate species are discussed in Section 3.17 of the 

September 2009 Service Level EA. 

Tree and brush clearing is expected to occur to improve crossing site distance for both 

vehicle and train traffic. This work would be conducted during specific time periods to 

comply with MBTA and BGEPA. Specific time intervals and locations requiring clearing 

would be identified during the tier 2 project level NEPA analysis. The potential for 

affecting threatened and endangered species, along with potential mitigation measures, 

would be evaluated in detail in the tier 2 project level NEPA analysis for the Eola Main 

Line Improvements. Any potential impacts on threatened and endangered species 

identified during the tier 2 project level analysis would be minimized through the use of 

BMPs and timing restrictions. 

2.14.2 Five Round-Trip Trains per Day 

At the five round-trip TPD, the same species would have the potential to be affected as 

under the initial two round-trip TPD scenario. However, when capacity is increased from 

two to five round-trip TPD, additional operational modifications would be required and 

would have the potential to impact threatened and endangered species. The most current 

federally and state-listed species lists would need to be reviewed for the addition or 

removal of any of the species listed in Table 2.14-1, above. 

September 2009 Service Level EA Errata 

The table reference on page 3-73 was incorrect. The correct reference is Table 3.17-1, 

updated below to include the Eastern Massasauga rattlesnake and the Sheepnose mussel: 

Table 3.17-1 

Federally Listed, Threatened, and Endangered Species within the Project Area 

Common Name Scientific Name Status State 

Western prairie fringed orchid Platanthera praeclara Threatened IA 

Eastern Massasauga rattlesnake Sistrurus c. catenatus Candidate IA 

Sheepnose mussel Plethobasus cyphyus Candidate IA 

Prairie bush clover Lespedeza leptostachya Threatened IA, IL 

Eastern prairie fringed orchid Platanthera leucophaea Threatened IA, IL 

Indiana bata Myotis sodalist Endangered IA, IL 

Higgin’s-eye pearlymussel Lampsilis higginsii Endangered IA, IL 

Decurrent false aster Boltonia decurrens Threatened IL 

Piping plover Charadrius melodus Endangered IL 

Hine’s emerald dragonfly Somatochlora hineana Endangered IL 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 47

Common Name Scientific Name Status State 

Leafy-prairie clover Dalea foliosa Endangered IL 

Mead’s milkweed Asclepias meadii Threatened IL 

Lakeside daisy Hymenopsis herbacea Threatened IL 

Sources: Illinois – http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/lists/illinois-cty.html and 

Iowa – http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/lists/iowa_cty.html 

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service letter, October 16, 2009 

Note: 

a

 Critical habitat has been designated in LaSalle County, Illinois. 

2.15 CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS

Impacts from construction of the Eola Main Line Improvements and Wyanet Connection 

would be temporary. The time required for construction impacts to dissipate varies by the 

type of construction activity and resources affected. Construction activities include noise 

and air emissions from construction vehicles, potential erosion caused by grading, and the 

physical and visual disruption caused by the presence of construction crews and 

equipment. Most construction impacts cease immediately with completion of 

construction. 

2.15.1 No-Build Alternative 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

The No-Build Alternative would not result in changes to existing railroad infrastructure 

or operations. The Eola Main Line Improvements would not be constructed, and no 

passenger rail service would be added between Chicago and Iowa City. Therefore, no 

construction impacts would be associated with the No-Build Alternative except for 

ongoing maintenance and other regularly scheduled activities. 

Wyanet Connection 

The No-Build Alternative would not result in changes to existing railroad infrastructure 

or operations. The Wyanet Connection would not be constructed, and no passenger rail 

service would be added between Chicago and Iowa City. Therefore, no construction 

impacts would be associated with the No-Build Alternative except for ongoing 

maintenance and other regularly scheduled activities. 

2.15.2 Preferred Alternative - Two Round-trip Trains per Day 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

The Eola Main Line Improvements section of the Project area is located entirely within 

existing railroad ROW. As discussed in Section 3.19, Construction Impacts, of the 

September 2009 Service Level EA, ground disturbance may result in the removal of 

vegetation from some areas, and BMPs would be implemented to minimize both wind 

and water erosion of exposed soil. Areas would be revegetated as soon as practicable to 

maintain long-term stability. In addition to some vegetation removal, construction of the 

Eola Main Line Improvements would have both temporary and long-term impacts on the 

waterway within Eola Yard. The long-term impacts on this waterway are discussed in 

Section 2.10, Waterways (Stream Relocation). Although natural areas are adjacent to 

Eola Yard, most of the work would take place within the yard, so no direct construction 

impacts would occur. In addition, BMPs would be implemented to minimize indirect 

effects. 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

48 Service Level Environmental Assessment

Construction of the Eola Main Line Improvements would not affect local transportation 

patterns, other than minor, temporary traffic increases from construction crews. The work 

would be confined to the existing Eola Yard and would not impact any roadways or atgrade roadway crossings. In addition, because Eola Yard is a highly active yard that is 

currently operating, any track closures would need to be kept as short as possible to allow 

continued train operations. 

The equipment necessary to perform construction activities would also have a temporary 

impact on air quality and noise in the immediate vicinity of the yard, but these impacts 

would cease immediately with completion of construction. 

At this time, it is not feasible to evaluate all of the construction impacts as they are 

dependent on final design and the BMPs employed by the construction contractor. The 

implementation of BMPs would minimize, to the extent practicable, impacts related to 

staging areas and to the stockpiling and storing of equipment and materials. Construction 

timing, methods, equipment, and disposal sites would be determined during final design 

with input from the construction contractor. As discussed in Section 2.12, Water Quality, 

an NPDES construction permit and stormwater pollution prevention plan would be 

required. Other permits would be identified and applied for prior to construction. All 

necessary permits and approvals for the Eola Main Line Improvements would be 

acquired, and implementation of their requirements would help minimize construction 

impacts. 

Wyanet Connection 

The Wyanet Connection section of the Project area is the largest construction area outside 

of the existing railroad ROW along the length of the Preferred Alternative. As discussed 

in Section 3.19, Construction Impacts, of the September 2009 Service Level EA, ground 

disturbance would result in the removal of vegetation from some areas, and BMPs would 

be implemented to minimize both wind and water erosion of exposed soil. Areas would 

be revegetated as soon as practicable to maintain long-term stability. In addition to 

vegetation clearing, construction of the Wyanet Connection would have both temporary 

and long-term impacts on Pond Creek and temporary impacts on floodplains. The longterm impacts on Pond Creek are discussed in Section 2.10, Waterways (Stream 

Relocation). The adjacent prairie areas would be protected from indirect effects through 

the implementation of BMPs. 

Construction of the Wyanet Connection would not affect local transportation patterns 

because it would not impact any roadways or at-grade roadway crossings other than by 

causing temporary traffic increases from construction crews. In addition, because the 

railroads are currently operating, any track closures would need to be kept as short as 

possible to allow continued train operations. 

The equipment necessary to perform construction activities would have a temporary 

impact on air quality and noise in the immediate vicinity of construction, but these 

impacts would cease immediately with completion of construction. 

At this time, it is not feasible to evaluate all of the construction impacts as they are 

dependent on final design and the BMPs employed by the construction contractor. The 

implementation of BMPs would minimize, to the extent practicable, impacts related to 

staging areas and to the stockpiling and storing of equipment and materials. Construction 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 49

timing, methods, equipment, and disposal sites would be determined during final design 

with input from the construction contractor. As discussed in Section 2.12, Water Quality, 

an NPDES construction permit and a stormwater pollution prevention plan would be 

required. Other permits would be identified and applied for prior to construction. All 

necessary permits and approvals for the Wyanet Connection would be acquired, and 

implementation of their requirements would minimize construction impacts. 

2.15.3 Preferred Alternative - Five Round-trip Trains per Day 

Eola Main Line Improvements 

Implementation of the ultimate service level envisioned by the MWRRI (five round-trip 

TPD) would affect only the operational environment and would not require any 

additional construction in the Eola Main Line Improvements section of the Project area. 

Therefore, construction impacts would be identical to those projected for two round-trip 

TPD. 

Wyanet Connection 

Implementation of the ultimate service level envisioned by the MWRRI (five round-trip 

TPD) would affect only the operational environment and would not require any 

additional construction in the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area. Therefore, 

construction impacts would be identical to those projected for two round-trip TPD. 

2.16 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS

This summary of impacts includes the summary presented in Section 3.22, Summary of 

Impacts, of the September 2009 Service Level EA. It also incorporates information 

presented in Sections 2.3, Transportation, through 2.15, Construction Impacts. 

Route A (the Preferred Alternative) is the environmentally preferable alternative; when 

compared to the Route B Alternative it requires fewer miles of track improvements, is a 

shorter and faster route, would provide better ridership, and would provide more 

environmental benefits. 

The Route A Alternative is 219 miles long and would require approximately 102 miles of 

track upgrade, whereas the Route B Alternative is 238 miles long and would require 

196 miles of track upgrade. Route A would attract a projected ridership of 

187,000 compared to 147,000 on Route B. The Route A Alternative is projected to divert 

117,000 vehicle trips, 16,000 bus passenger trips, and 42,000 plane passengers per year, 

reducing fuel usage and non-passenger rail transportation system congestion in the 

Project area. The Route B Alternative is projected to divert 92,000 vehicle trips, 

12,000 bus passenger trips, and 33,000 plane passengers per year, reducing fuel usage 

and nonpassenger rail transportation system congestion to a lesser extent than the 

Route A Alternative. Under the No-Build Alternative, traffic congestion would continue 

to worsen. 

Both the Route A and Route B alternatives would provide economic benefits through job 

creation, the potential for joint development, and increased economic activity. There 

would be no disproportionate impacts on minorities and low-income populations. The 

passenger rail service would provide increased mobility and employment opportunities 

throughout the Project area. These improvements would not be realized, and 

socioeconomic conditions would not change under the No-Build Alternative. 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

50 Service Level Environmental Assessment

In general, under both build alternatives, existing adjacent land uses would likely 

continue and future land use patterns would not change. The proposed Amtrak station in 

Moline is expected to enhance transportation-oriented development adjacent to the rail 

line at an existing bus station. Construction of the Wyanet Connection for the Route A 

Alternative would require the acquisition of approximately 7 acres of land, including 

approximately 2 acres of farmland. Land use would not change under the No-Build 

Alternative. 

Both build alternatives would improve public health and safety by upgrading grade 

crossing signal equipment and providing a safe, efficient modal choice for travel from 

Chicago to Iowa City, through the Quad Cities. Under both build alternatives, noise 

impacts would increase; the areas affected between Chicago and Wyanet would differ, 

but the total number of impacts would be approximately the same. The safety benefits 

provided by the build alternatives would not be realized under the No-Build Alternative. 

Noise conditions would not change under the No-Build Alternative. 

The Route A Alternative would reduce annual emissions of HC and CO to a greater 

extent (7 tons and 199 tons, respectively) compared to the Route B Alternative (5 tons 

and 155 tons, respectively). Under both build alternatives, annual emissions of NOx, 

PM-10, and PM-2.5 would increase. Under the No-Build Alternative, emissions of 

pollutants generated by vehicles and planes are expected to increase with anticipated 

worsening congestion. 

Fewer hazardous material sites exist near the Route A Alternative (approximately 

239 sites compared to 364 sites near the Route B Alternative). The No-Build Alternative 

would not be affected by hazardous material sites. The safety of hazardous material 

transportation by freight trains would improve under both build alternatives because of 

track and crossing upgrades but would remain unchanged under the No-Build 

Alternative. 

No impacts on cultural resources, parks, or INAI sites are expected under either build 

alternative. Construction of the Wyanet Connection under the Route A Alternative would 

impact approximately 0.20 acre of native prairie and 2.2 acres of a planted prairie. The 

tier 2 project level NEPA process would include additional analysis for avoidance, 

minimization, and mitigation for the impacts on prairie. Additional specific analysis 

would also take place during the tier 2 project level NEPA evaluation for each of the 

specific projects listed in Section 4.0, Next Steps. 

The Route A Alternative would cross approximately 120 waterways, compared to 

128 crossed by the Route B Alternative. Based on a review of the NWI, there are 

144 wetlands within 100 feet of the Route A Alternative and 263 wetlands within 

100 feet of the Route B Alternative. The Eola Main Line Improvements, which are 

required only for the Route A Alternative, would impact approximately 4,920 feet of 

linear stormwater conveyances associated with the headwaters of Indian Creek. The 

Wyanet Connection, which is required only for the Route A Alternative, would include 

work outside of the existing ROW, including the relocation of 2,050 feet of Pond Creek. 

The tier 2 project level NEPA evaluations for the Eola Main Line Improvements and the 

Wyanet Connection would include a full range of alternatives, impact assessment, and 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 51

mitigation development, as well as permit applications, to minimize the impact on these 

waterways to the extent practical. 

Both build alternatives would cross several floodplains, but impacts would be temporary 

and would cease when construction is completed. During the tier 2 project level NEPA 

analysis, coordination with the appropriate floodplain administrator would occur to avoid 

any long-term impacts on the base floodplain. 

The same threatened and endangered species have been identified within the counties that 

would be crossed by both build alternatives. However, the Route B Alternative is also 

adjacent to critical habitat of the threatened Indiana bat. The No-Build Alternative would 

not impact waterways, wetlands, floodplains, or threatened and endangered species. 

Under the Route A Alternative, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions would decrease by 

2,001 tons per year and fuel usage would decline by 266,000 gallons per year as 

compared to the No-Build Alternative. Under the Route B alternative, GHG emissions 

would decrease by 1,000 tons per year and annual fuel usage would decline by 

159,000 gallons per year as compared to the No-Build Alternative. 

Construction impacts would be similar for both the Route A and Route B alternatives and 

would be mitigated by the use of BMPs. Specific construction impacts would be 

evaluated during the tier 2 project level NEPA analysis. 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

52 Service Level Environmental Assessment

3.0 COMMENTS AND COORDINATION 

Subsequent to publication of the September 2009 Service Level EA, a public meeting 

was held, public comments were received, the Illinois DOT and Iowa DOT responded to 

comments, and additional correspondence with agencies occurred. 

3.1 PUBLIC MEETING

On September 29, 2009, Illinois DOT and Iowa DOT held a public information meeting 

at the Moline i wireless Center from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. to obtain public comments on the 

September 2009 Service Level EA. Of the 52 people attending the public information 

meeting, all but one was in support of the Project. All those who expressed a preference 

for one alternative preferred the Route A Alternative. The one individual who was not in 

full support of the Project was not convinced that ridership would meet projections and 

felt the cost was not worth the projected benefits. 

In general, those in favor of the Project were excited by the prospect of passenger rail 

service coming to the Quad Cities and the potential for future expansion of service with 

the MWRRI. Copies of the EA and preliminary engineering drawings were available for 

the public to peruse, and many attendees spent time reviewing the documents. During the 

meeting, 15 attendees provided written comments that expressed support for the Project, 

selection of the Route A Alternative, and rapid progression to operation of the two round 

trip TPD. 

3.2 PUBLIC COMMENTS

Comments were received from the public and agencies via the Project website, public 

meeting comment forms, a phone information line, email, and mail. Table 3.2-1 

summarizes the source of comments by media type. The majority of the comments were 

received from the website or by email. 

Table 3.2-1 

Comments by Media Type 

Media Total Agency Public 

Email 23 1 22 

Information line 2 0 2 

Letter 15 9 6 

Meeting comment form 15 0 15 

Website 41 0 41 

Total 96 10 86 

Table 3.2-2 summarizes the comments by topic. Of the 96 comments received, 40 stated 

support for the Project, and four expressed opposition to the Route B Alternative. Of 

those comments supporting the proposed service and stating a preference for an 

alternative, most supported Route A. Five comments were received regarding 

transportation issues, three regarding noise, two regarding air quality, one regarding 

cultural resources, and two regarding natural resources. 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 53

Table 3.2-2 

Comments by Topic 

Topic Total Agency Public 

Alternatives 1 0 1 

General comment 3 1 2 

General support 40 0 40 

Opposition to Alternative B 4 0 4 

Support Alternative A 23 0 23 

Support Alternative B 12 0 12 

Transportation 5 3 2 

Noise 3 2 1 

Air quality 2 1 1 

Cultural resources 1 1 0 

Natural resources 2 2 0 

Total 96 10 86 

3.3 COMMENT RESPONSES

All comments received from the public and agencies were reviewed and addressed. 

Attachment 9, Agency Comment Letters, contains copies of the comment letters received 

from USAG-RIA (sent to both Illinois DOT and Iowa DOT), FTA, USFWS (the Chicago 

Ecological Services Field Office and the Rock Island Field Office), the Peoria Tribe of 

Indians of Oklahoma, EPA, Illinois Historical Preservation Agency, USACE-Chicago 

District, as well as an email comment from Illinois EPA. Attachment 10 contains a 

complete list of all comments received on the EA, the issues raised in the comments, and 

the responses to the comments. In most cases, the commenter expressed a preference or 

an opinion concerning an alternative or the Project; these comments have been noted. 

In a few cases, the comment on the EA identified a concern or issue that requires 

additional analysis, clarification, or correction. This document responds to these 

comments and contains the new information, clarification, or correction required to 

address the issues identified in the comment and/or to correct the EA. 

3.4 AGENCY COORDINATION

Subsequent to publication of the September 2009 Service Level EA, additional agency 

correspondence was received. This correspondence is summarized in Table 3.4-1. These 

letters can be found in Attachment 9. 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

54 Service Level Environmental Assessment

Table 3.4-1 

Agency Coordination 

Date Coordination Key Comments 

IDNR April 1, 2010 Wyanet Connection: The natural resources review provided by 

[Ecological Compliance Assessment Tool] EcoCAT identified 

protected resources that may be in the vicinity of the proposed action. 

The Department has evaluated this information and concluded that 

adverse effects are unlikely. Therefore, consultation under 17 Ill. 

Adm. Code Part 1075 is terminated. 

Iowa State 

Historical 

Society 

May 3, 2010 Wyanet Connection: The Phase I survey assessment of the 

archaeological resources appear to be adequate. The consultation for 

this section of the project area is approved for purposes of the Tier 1 

Environmental Assessment. 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 55

4.0 NEXT STEPS 

As stated in Chapter 1 and throughout the September 2009 Service Level EA, the purpose 

of the EA is to provide FRA with documentation to support a decision that the proposed 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service could be implemented without 

significant impacts on the environment. Tier 2 NEPA documentation, studies, and design 

would be needed to assess location-specific impacts and identify measures to avoid, or 

further minimize and mitigate adverse environmental effects. A new tier 1 service level 

analysis would be needed before five round-trip TPD would be authorized. This chapter 

describes how FRA, Iowa DOT, and Illinois DOT plan to complete the additional 

documentation and design needed to advance the Project. 

4.1 PROJECT SECTIONS

As funding becomes available, the design and the tier 2 project level NEPA 

documentation would be advanced for sections of the Project. Separate tier 2 project level 

NEPA documentation would be prepared for each of the sections identified with two 

round-trip TPD. The tier 2 project level NEPA document would assess the environmental 

effects of all reasonable alternatives and would document measures to avoid or to further 

minimize and mitigate impacts. 

At this time, the tier 2 project level sections are expected to be as listed below, but they 

may be combined or modified based on available funding. 

Tier 2 Project sections required regardless of the alternative selected: 

• Illinois Track Improvements – This tier 2 project level NEPA document would 

include the track, tie, culvert, and bridge improvement or replacement to bring 

existing track to the standards needed for passenger trains operating at maximum 

speeds up to 90 mph from Halstead Street in Chicago to Wyanet along the 

alignment in Illinois. 

• Iowa Track Improvements – This tier 2 project level NEPA document would 

include the track, tie, culvert, and bridge improvement or replacement to bring 

existing track to the standards needed for 79 mph passenger trains along the 

alignment in Iowa. 

• Geneseo, Illinois, Station – There is currently no passenger train station in 

Geneseo. This tier 2 project level NEPA document would include the evaluation 

of station location alternatives and design. 

• Iowa City, Iowa, Station – This tier 2 project level NEPA document would 

include the evaluation of the repurchase and remodel of the existing station in 

Iowa City. Should acquisition not be possible, an evaluation of station locations 

and design would be conducted in-lieu of the analysis of remodeling the existing 

station. 

• Moline, Illinois, Station – There is currently no passenger train station in Moline. 

This tier 2 project level NEPA document would include the evaluation of station 

location alternatives and design. 

• Iowa City, Iowa, Layover Facility – There is currently no layover facility in 

Iowa City. This tier 2 project level NEPA document would include the evaluation 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

56 Service Level Environmental Assessment

of layover facility location alternatives and design. Alternatives considered may 

include areas outside of existing railroad ROW. 

• Colona, Illinois, Improvements – This tier 2 project level NEPA document 

would evaluate alternatives and design to improve the BNSF crossing in Colona. 

• Rock Island, Illinois, Yard Bypass – This tier 2 project level NEPA document 

would evaluate alternatives and design for a yard bypass track to allow passenger 

trains to avoid traveling through the Rock Island Yard.

• Silvis, Illinois, Bypass – If the Rock Island Yard bypass is not implemented, a 

tier 2 project level NEPA document would evaluate alternatives and design for 

improvements to the existing track alignments in Silvis. 

Additional tier 2 Project sections needed if the Preferred Alternative is selected: 

• Wyanet Connection – This tier 2 project level NEPA document would present 

alternatives and design for the connection between the BNSF and IAIS railroads 

near Wyanet. See the Wyanet Connection discussion in Section 2.3.1, Preferred 

Alternative (Route A – Amtrak-BNSF-IAIS) in the September 2009 Service Level 

EA for more information on this connection. 

• Eola, Illinois, Main Line Improvements – This tier 2 project level NEPA 

document would include the evaluation of alternatives and design to provide 

adequate main-track capacity to enable on-time operation of the proposed 

Chicago to Iowa City passenger rail service without disrupting the on-time 

schedule performance of other Amtrak intercity passenger trains and Metra 

commuter trains, and without affecting the operation of BNSF freight trains. The 

Eola Main Line Improvements would provide infrastructure at a bottleneck where 

main-track capacity is at present fully consumed by existing Amtrak long-distance 

and intercity passenger trains, Metra commuter passenger trains, and BNSF 

freight trains. See Section 2.0, Wyanet Connection and Eola Main Line 

Improvements Supplemental Information, for additional information on Eola 

Yard. 

Additional tier 2 Project sections needed if the Route B Alternative is selected: 

• Morris, Illinois, Station – There is currently no passenger train station in Morris. 

This tier 2 project level NEPA document would include the evaluation of station 

location alternatives and design. 

• Peru or La Salle, Illinois, Station – There are currently no passenger train 

stations in Peru or La Salle. This tier 2 project level NEPA document would 

include the evaluation of station location alternatives and design. 

Increasing train traffic to five round-trip TPD from Chicago to Iowa City, and maximum 

speeds up to 90 mph from Halstead Street in Chicago to Wyanet, would require the 

construction of additional sidings between Chicago and Iowa City and upgrades of 

signals and at-grade crossings between Chicago and Wyanet. Additional parking may be 

required at Amtrak stations along the proposed route. Project sections requiring 

additional sidings and crossing upgrades have not yet been identified for the ultimate five 

round-trip TPD operational level. The uncertainties that exist for this operational level 

make identification of sections difficult and impractical at this time. The construction 

impacts would be similar to those described for two round-trip TPD but would require 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 57

more new construction and additional ROW. Prior to implementation of the five roundtip TPD scenario, a supplemental tier 1 service level NEPA document would be 

developed to assess potential impacts on environmental resources along the route from 

Chicago to Iowa City. This would be followed by tier 2 project level NEPA documents 

for implementation. 

4.2 ADDITIONAL STUDIES

During the tier 2 project level NEPA process, multiple documents would be developed. 

These documents are anticipated to be a mixture of environmental assessments for areas 

such as the Wyanet Connection, and categorical exclusions for areas with minimal 

effects. The specific type of NEPA document has not yet been determined for each of the 

Project sections. 

In addition to NEPA documentation for the Project sections, design would be advanced 

and numerous studies would be completed as part of the tier 2 project level NEPA 

process to determine the specific nature and quantity of impacts. The design process 

would consider avoidance, minimization, and mitigation of impacts on sensitive 

environmental resources. Based on the Project section, the following studies may be 

required: 

• Wetland delineations 

• Cultural resources surveys and Section 106 consultation 

• Threatened and endangered species surveys 

• Engineering surveys 

• Noise analysis 

• Section 4(f) resource evaluation 

• Phase I Environmental Site Assessments 

• Air emissions analysis in non-attainment areas 

• Hydraulic modeling for surface waters and floodplains 

• Stream relocation studies 

In addition to the various studies, mitigation for impacts would also be developed. 

Several resources, such as surface water, wetlands, and floodplains, require approvals 

through permitting prior to construction disturbance; permits would be applied for 

subsequent to completion of NEPA documentation at a later date. Anticipated types of 

mitigation could include, but are not limited to, wetland mitigation, stream mitigation, 

construction timing restrictions for threatened and endangered species, implementation of 

a stormwater pollution prevention plan, implementation of BMPs, and documentation of 

historic railroad structures. 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

58 Service Level Environmental Assessment

5.0 REFERENCES 

16 USC 1531 et seq. U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973. 

17 Illinois Administrative Code 3700. May 26, 2005. Construction in Floodways of 

Rivers, Lakes and Streams. 

17 Illinois Administrative Code 3706. July 21, 1979. Regulation of Construction within 

Flood Plains. 

33 USC 1251 et seq. Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act) of 1977, as 

amended November 27, 2002. 

33 USC 1344. Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, as amended November 27, 2002.40 

CFR Part 312. Innocent Landowners, Standards for Conducting All Inquiry. 

44 CFR 70. October 1, 2009. Procedure for Map Correction. 

49 USC 303. Section 4(f) of the U.S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966. 

49 USC 303. Section 4(f) of the U.S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966. 

74 Federal Register 58688 – 58781. November 13, 2009. Air Quality Designations for the 

2006 24-Hour Fine Particle (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Final 

Rule. EPA. 

415 ILCS 5/3 et seq. Illinois Environmental Protection Act, as amended March 20, 2010. 

415 ILCS 5/14 et seq. Illinois Groundwater Protection Act, as amended March 20, 2010. 

Bureau County Emergency Service and Disaster Administration. July 2, 2010. Personnel 

communication regarding local floodplain requirements with Kristine Donarski, 

Director. 

Du Page County Department of Economic Development and Planning, Division of 

Environmental Concerns. August 1, 2008. Stormwater Management Permit. DuPage 

County Countywide Stormwater and Flood Plain Ordinance. Retrieved July 9, 2010. 

http://www.dupageco.org/dec/generic.cfm?doc_id=4129 

Energy Information Administration. Official Energy Statistics from the U.S. 

Government: Voluntary Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Program (Fuel and Energy 

Source Codes and Emission Coefficients. http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ 

coefficients.html. Retrieved on September 14, 2009. 

EO 12088. Federal Compliance with Pollution Control Standards. Published at 43 FR 

477707, October 13, 1978.EPA, Office of Transportation and Air Quality. August 

2005. Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and Fuel Consumption for 

Gasoline-Fueled Passenger Cars and Light Trucks, EPA420-F-05-022. 

https://www.whatcomsmarttrips.org/pdf/Emission%20Facts%202005.pdf. Retrieved 

on September 14, 2009. 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 59

EPA, Office of Transportation and Air quality. April 2009. Technical Highlights: 

Emission Factors for Locomotives, EPA-420-F-09-025. http://www.epa.gov/OMS/ 

regs/nonroad/locomotv/420f09025.pdf. Retrieved on September 14, 2009. 

EPA, Technology Transfer Network, Clearinghouse for Inventories & Emissions Factors. 

N.d. Emissions Factors & AP 42. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/index.html. 

Retrieved on September 14, 2009. 

EPA and USACE. December 2, 2008. “Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Following the U.S. 

Supreme Court's Decision in Rapanos v. United States & Carabell v. United States.” 

Available online at http://www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands/pdf/CWA_Jurisdiction_ 

Following_Rapanos120208.pdf 

EPA FRS. June 25, 2010.Query Results for Wyanet, Illinois. Retrieved on June 25, 2010. 

http://iaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_map_master.fii_retrieve 

Erdman, Anne L. et al. 1996. A Manual for Conducting Preliminary Environmental Site 

Assessments for Illinois Department of Transportation Highway Projects. Open File 

Series 1996-5. http://library.isgs.uiuc.edu/Pubs/pdfs/ofs/1996/ofs1996-05.pdf 

FEMA. June 15, 1984. FEMA Floodplain Map. Flood Insurance Rate Map; 

Unincorporated Bureau County, Illinois. Panel 200 of 250. Map Number FM170729 

0200A. http://msc.fema.gov/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/QuickOrderView? 

storeId=10001&catalogId=10001&langId=-1&userType=G 

FEMA. December 16, 2004. Flood Insurance Rate Map; Du Page County, Illinois and 

Incorporated Areas. Panel 0704 of 1006. Map Number 17043C0704H. 

http://msc.fema.gov/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/QuickOrderView?storeId=10001&cat

alogId=10001&langId=-1&userType=G 

FEMA. August 3, 2009. Flood Insurance Rate Map; Kane County, Illinois and 

Incorporated Areas. Panels 343 and 344 of 410. Map Numbers 17089C0343H and 

17089C0344H. http://msc.fema.gov/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/QuickOrderView? 

storeId=10001&catalogId=10001&langId=-1&userType=G 

FHWA, Office of Natural and Human Environment. April 2005. Assessing the Effects of 

Freight Movement on Air Quality at the National and Regional Level, Final Report. 

Forest Preserve District of DuPage County. 2009. Night Heron Marsh. Available online 

at: http://www.dupageforest.com/Conservation/ForestPreserves/Night_Heron_Marsh. 

html. Retrieved on July 11, 2010. 

Fox Valley Park District. 2010. Fox Valley Map. Available online at: 

http://foxvalleyparkdistrict.org/interactive-map/index.html. Retrieved on July 9, 2010. 

FTA. May 2006. Transit Noise and Vibration Assessment – Final Report, FTA-VA-90-

1003-06. Washington, DC: Harris Miller, Miller & Hanson, Inc. 

Hanson Professional Services, Inc. July 3, 2008. Moline-Rock Island Metropolitan Rail 

Study. Final Report. http://www.moline.il.us/departments/planning/economic/ 

pdf/Rail%20Study/moline%20report.pdf. Retrieved on August 14, 2009. 

HDR. 2010. Eola Main Line Improvements Wetland Delineation Technical Memo, 

prepared for Illinois and Iowa DOTs. July, 2010 
Supplemental Information 

August 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

60 Service Level Environmental Assessment

HDR. 2010. Eola Main Line Improvements Cultural Resources. Report prepared for the 

Illinois and Iowa Departments of Transportation, July 2010. 

IDNR. 2010. “Hennepin Canal – State Trail.” Available online at 

http://dnr.state.il.us/lands/landmgt/parks/r1/hennpin.htm. Retrieved on June 25, 2010. 

IDOT. July 28, 2010. Personal communication regarding IDNR concurrence with 

proposed mitigation from Barbara Stevens, Chief of Environmental Section, to John 

Morton, HDR. 

Illinois Emergency Management Agency. No date. Hazardous Materials Incident Reports 

Database. Retrieved on June 25, 2010. http://tier2.iema.state.il.us/ 

FOIAHazmatSearch/Default.aspxIllinois EPA, 2010a. Lower Fox River Watershed 

http://www.epa.state.il.us/water/water-quality/report-1996/fact-sheets/fact-sheet04.html 

Illinois EPA. 2010b. Illinois Integrated Water Quality Report and Section 303 (d) List. 

Water Resource Assessment Information and Listing of Impaired Waters 

Illinois EPA Bureau of Water. August2008. Illinois Integrated Water Quality Report and 

Section 303(d) List–2008, CWA Sections 303(d), 305(b) and 314, Water Resource 

Assessment Information and Listing of Impaired Waters IEPA/BOW/08-016. 

http://www.epa.state.il.us/water/tmdl/303-appendix/2008/2008-final-draft-303d.pdf. 

Retrieved on July 9, 2010. 

Illinois EPA. June 24, 2010. Facility Compliance Tracking System. Retrieved on June 25, 

2010. http://epadata.epa.state.il.us/land/webfacts/ 

Illinois EPA. June 25, 2010. Bureau of Land Data-Center Inventory report. Retrieved on 

June 25, 2010. http://epadata.epa.state.il.us/land/inventory/index.asp 

Illinois EPA. No date b. Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Tracking. 

Retrieved on June 25, 2010. http://epadata.epa.state.il.us/land/ust/ 

Illinois EPA. Site Remediation Program. No date a. Site Remediation Program Database. 

Retrieved on June 25, 2010. http://epadata.epa.state.il.us/land/srp/ 

INHS. May 5, 2010. Wyanet Connection Wetland Survey. Conducted by the Illinois 

Natural History Survey for the Illinois Department of Transportation Bureau of 

Design and Environment. 

INHS. July 19, 2010. Botanical Survey for the Illinois Department of Transportation 

Wyanet Connection Between IAIS and BNSF in Bureau County, Illinois. Conducted 

by the Illinois Natural History Survey for the Illinois Department of Transportation 

Bureau of Design and Environment. 

ISGS. April 8, 2010. Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment. Final Report. Proposed 

Track Connection between the BNSF and IAIS Railroads near Wyanet, Bureau 

County. 

Illinois State Water Survey. June 2008. Identification of Unmapped Special Flood Hazard 

Areas in Illinois. Retrieved July 1, 2010. http://www.illinoisfloodmaps.org/ 

DFIRMpdf/nosfha/ISWSNoSFHAbureau.pdf 
 Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 61

Kane County Stormwater Management. January 1, 2005. Kane County Stormwater 

Ordinance. Retrieved July 9, 2010. http://www.co.kane.il.us/kcstorm/index.asp 

Metra 2009. Ridership Reports - System Facts. 

http://metrarail.com/metra/en/home/about_metra/planning_records_reports/ridership_

reports.html. Retrieved on July 7, 2010. 

University of Illinois Board of Trustees. 2009. Illinois Natural Areas. Available online at: 

http://www.inhs.illinois.edu/research/inai/overview.html. Retrieved on July 11, 2010. 

U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. N.d. 

Transportation Energy Data Book, Download Edition 2B. 

http://www-cta.ornl.gov/data/download28.shtml. Retrieved on September 14, 2009. 

USDOT FRA, Illinois DOT, and Iowa DOT. September 2009. Chicago to Iowa City 

Intercity Passenger Rail Service Tier 1 Service Level Environmental Assessment. 

Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_train. Retrieved on July 9, 2010. 

Union

Station

BNSF

Morris

Peru--La Salle

Princeton

Mendota

Plano Naperville

Joliet

Geneseo

Wyanet

La Grange Rd

IAIS

IAIS

CSXT

METRA

Cedar Rapids

Iowa City

Quad Cities

Rockford

Chicago

Peoria

Mississippi River

Lake Michigan

Eola Main Line

Improvements

Proposed Wyanet Connection

WILL

COOK

LA SALLE

HENRY

BUREAU

KANE

DE KALB

GRUNDY

DU PAGE

KENDALL

ROCK ISLAND

CEDAR

SCOTT

JOHNSON

MUSCATINE

55

57

88

74 39

380

65

90

43

94

290

155

I l l i n o i s

I o w a

W i s c o n s i n

DATE

FIGURE

August 2010

1-1

Z:\Projects\IDOT\115305_ARRA_HighSpRailGrant_App\map_docs\mxd\Eola_Yard\Project_Location.mxd\july10\jcm

Project Location

Supplemental Information to the 2009 Tier 1 Service Level Environmental

Assessment for Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service

25 12.5 0 25

Miles

Scale

Legend

Existing AMTRAK Station

Proposed AMTRAK Station

Route A Alternative

Route B Alternative

Routes A & B Alternative

BNSF-Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway

CSXT-CSX Transportation

IAIS -Iowa Interstate Railroad
Proposed Main Line

Improvements

KANE CO DUPAGE CO

DATE

FIGURE

August 2010

1-2

Z:\Projects\IDOT\115305_ARRA_HighSpRailGrant_App\map_docs\mxd\Eola_Yard\Area_Map.mxd\july10\jcm

Eola Main Line Improvements Section

of the Project Area

Supplemental Information to the 2009 Tier 1 Service Level Environmental

Assessment for Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service

0.3 0.15 0 0.3

Miles

Scale

Legend

Proposed Main Line Improvements

Eola Yard Environmental Survey Limits
Proposed Wyanet Connection

Wyanet

IAIS

BNSF

IAIS

Pond Creek

Pond Creek

DATE

FIGURE

August 2010

1-3

Z:\Projects\IDOT\115305_ARRA_HighSpRailGrant_App\map_docs\mxd\Wyanet_Connection\Area_map.mxd\july10\jcm

Wyanet Connection Section of the Project Area

Supplemental Information to the 2009 Tier 1 Service Level Environmental

Assessment for Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service

0.3 0.15 0 0.3

Miles

Scale

Legend

Proposed Wyanet Connection

Wyanet LOC
Union

Station

BNSF

Mendota

Plano Naperville

Joliet

Rockford

Chicago

Lake Michigan

Eola Yard

Western

Avenue

Corridor

Belt Railway of Chicago

Aurora Subdivision

Mendota Subdivision

Chicago Subdivision

EJE

BNSF

BNSF

I l l i n o i s

I n d i a n a

DATE

FIGURE

August 2010

2.1-1

Z:\Projects\IDOT\115305_ARRA_HighSpRailGrant_App\map_docs\mxd\Eola_Yard\Vicinity.mxd\juy10\jcm

Regional Rail Related to Eola Main Line

Improvements

Supplemental Information to the 2009 Tier 1 Service Level Environmental

Assessment for Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service

10 5 0 10

Miles

Scale
KANE CO DUPAGE CO

Hill Yard

Aurora Transportation Center

West Yard

Eola Yard

East Yard

Eola

MP 33.4

West Eola

MP 35.3

DATE

FIGURE

August 2010

2.1-2

Z:\Projects\IDOT\115305_ARRA_HighSpRailGrant_App\map_docs\mxd\Eola_Yard\Eola_Yard_Detail.mxd\july10\jcm

Eola Main Line Improvements Vicinity

Supplemental Information to the 2009 Tier 1 Service Level Environmental

Assessment for Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service

0.5 0.25 0 0.5

Miles

Scale

Legend

Proposed Main Line Improvements

Eola Yard Environmental Survey Limits
Proposed Main Line

Improvements

KANE CO DUPAGE CO

DATE

FIGURE

August 2010

2.6-1

Z:\Projects\IDOT\115305_ARRA_HighSpRailGrant_App\map_docs\mxd\Eola_Yard\Environmental_Constraints.mxd\july10\jcm

Eola Main Line Improvements Environmental

Constraints

Supplemental Information to the 2009 Tier 1 Service Level Environmental

Assessment for Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service

0.3 0.15 0 0.3

Miles

Scale

Legend

Proposed Main Line Improvements

Eola Yard Environmental Survey Limits

REC Site

Park/Natural Area

100-Year Floodplain (FEMA)

Delineated Wetlands

NWI
Proposed Wyanet Connection

Wyanet

Hennepin Canal Parkway

IAIS

Hennepin Canal State Trail

BNSF

IAIS

Pond Creek

Pond Creek

Hennepin Canal

Village of Wyanet

AREA NOT INCLUDED

Prairie A Prairie B

DATE

FIGURE

August 2010

2.6-2

Z:\Projects\IDOT\115305_ARRA_HighSpRailGrant_App\map_docs\mxd\Wyanet_Connection\Environmental_Constraints.mxd\july10\jcm

Wyanet Connection Environmental Constraints

Supplemental Information to the 2009 Tier 1 Service Level Environmental

Assessment for Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service

0.3 0.15 0 0.3

Miles

Scale

Legend

Hazardous Materials Sites

Proposed Wyanet Connection

Wyanet LOC

Trail

Streams (NHD)

State Park

State Natural Areas

Prairie (Grade B to A-)

Prairie (Grade C to D+)

100-Year Floodplain (FEMA)

Delineated Wetlands

NWI

Attachments Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Attachment 1 

Eola Main Line Improvements PESA 

Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

Eola Mainline Improvements 

City of Aurora, DuPage, and Kane Counties, Illinois 

Prepared for: 

Illinois Department of Transportation 

Iowa Department of Transportation 

Prepared by: 

HDR Engineering, Inc. 

8550 W. Bryn Mawr Ave. 

Ste. 900 

Chicago, IL 60631 

142673 

July 13, 2010 

 

July 13, 2010 

George Weber, 

Chief, Bureau of Railroads 

Illinois Department of Transportation 

100 W. Randolph 

Suite 6-600 

Chicago, IL 60601 

Re: Eola Mainline Improvements 

Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment Report Submittal 

Dear Mr. Weber: 

We are pleased to provide you with the above-referenced Preliminary Environmental Site 

Assessment (PESA) report. The attached report presents our methodology, findings, 

opinions, conclusions, and recommendations regarding environmental conditions at the 

Project site. 

HDR appreciates the opportunity to serve the Illinois DOT and Iowa DOT on this important 

Project. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact John Morton at 

(402) 399-4903. 

Cordially, 

HDR Engineering, Inc. 

John H. Morton, P.E. 

Senior Vice President 

CC: Walt Zyznieuski, BDE 

i 

Table of Contents 

 List of Acronyms ......................................................................................................... iii

1.0 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 1

2.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 2

2.1 Purpose of the PESA and Involved Parties ............................................................ 2

2.2 Scope of Services, Significant Assumptions, and Limitations ................................. 2

3.0 Site Description ............................................................................................................ 4

3.1 Location and Legal Description ............................................................................... 4

3.2 Site and Vicinity Characteristics .............................................................................. 4

3.3 Description of Structures, Roads, and Other Site Improvements ........................... 4

3.4 Area Geology and Hydrogeology ............................................................................ 4

4.0 User-Provided Information .......................................................................................... 5

5.0 Records Review ........................................................................................................... 5

5.1 Environmental Records Review .............................................................................. 5

5.2 Summary of Listed Records of Concern to the Project ........................................... 9

5.3 Local Government Information .............................................................................. 12

5.4 Historical Use Information ..................................................................................... 12

5.5 Environmental Liens and Additional Information ................................................... 13

5.6 Summary of Previous Environmental Investigations ............................................. 13

6.0 Site Reconnaissance and Interviews ....................................................................... 13

6.1 Site Reconnaissance ............................................................................................ 13

6.2 Interviews .............................................................................................................. 13

6.3 Known Current and Past Uses of the Site and Adjoining Properties .................... 14

6.4 Utilities and PCBs ................................................................................................. 14

7.0 Data Gap Analysis ...................................................................................................... 15

8.0 Findings and Conclusions ........................................................................................ 15

9.0 Recommendations ..................................................................................................... 15

10.0 Qualifications of Environmental Professionals ..................................................... 16

10.1 Signatures and Qualifications ............................................................................... 16

11.0 References ................................................................................................................ 17
ii 

List of Tables 

Table 1 – Summary of Environmental Database Search......................................................... 7

Appendices 

Appendix A – Figures 

Appendix B – Site Photographs 

Appendix C – EDR Information 

Appendix D – Interview Documentation 

Appendix E – Historical Research Documentation 

Appendix F – Resumes of HDR Personnel 
iii 

List of Acronyms 

AAI All Appropriate Inquiries 

AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System 

AST aboveground storage tank 

ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials 

bgs below ground surface 

BNSF Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway 

CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability 

 Information System 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CORRACTS Corrective Action Report 

EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency 

ERNS Emergency Response Notification System 

ESA Environmental Site Assessment 

FIFRA Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act 

FINDS Facility Index System 

FRDS Federal Reporting Data System 

FURS Federal Underground Injection Control 

HDR HDR Engineering, Inc. 

LUST leaking underground storage tank 

MINES Mines Master Index File 

NFRAP No Further Remedial Action Planned 

NPL National Priority List 

NWI National Wetlands Inventory 

PESA Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment 

RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act 

RCRIS LQG Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System 

 Large Quantity Generators 

RCRIS SQG Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System 

 Small Quantity Generators 

RCRIS TSD Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System 

 Treatment, Storage, and Disposal 

REC recognized environmental condition 

SI Site Inspection 

Spills Spills Database 

SRP Site Remediation Program 
iv 

SWF/LF Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill 

TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act 

USC United States Code

USGS United States Geological Survey 

UST underground storage tank 

Note: A more complete acronym list is located in the EDR Report, Appendix C.
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

1 

1.0 Executive Summary 

HDR Engineering, Inc. (HDR) has conducted a Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment 

(PESA) for the Eola Mainline Improvements Project area in the City of Aurora, in DuPage 

and Kane Counties, Illinois. In this report, the “Project area” is defined as the Burlington 

Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) Eola Yard between Farnsworth Avenue (the western 

terminus) and Eola Road (the eastern terminus). 

Land use adjacent to Eola Yard consists primarily of residential land use, with some 

agricultural and industrial uses. According to HDR’s review of historical sources, including 

historical aerial photographs, historical topographic maps, and personal interviews, the 

Project area has been a rail yard since the 1870s. The properties adjacent to the west end of 

the rail yard have been industrial properties since at least 1978. Properties adjacent to the 

middle and east end of Eola Yard were primarily farmland with some industrial and 

residential development until the mid-1990s, when most of the farmland was developed for 

industrial and residential uses. 

This report identifies recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in the Project corridor that 

may adversely affect railroad construction or Project right-of-way acquisition (if required). 

This PESA was conducted in general conformance with the scope and limitations of 

A Manual for Preliminary Environmental Site Assessments for Illinois Department of 

Transportation Highway Projects and American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) 

Practice E 1527-05. Any exceptions to or deletions from these ASTM practices are described 

later in this report. This report includes a summary of the site reconnaissance conducted on 

June 23, 2010, a review of environmental databases, a review of historical data sources, and 

on-site and telephone interviews. 

This report has revealed evidence of RECs in connection with the Project area. Because of 

this, HDR recommends that the Illinois and Iowa Departments of Transportation (DOT) notify 

the selected construction contractor that subsurface hazardous material impacts are present 

within the Eola Mainline Improvements construction zone. The construction contractor should 

be prepared for the possibility of encountering affected soils, and should be prepared to 

detect, excavate, document, and dispose of affected materials in compliance with applicable 

environmental laws and regulations should they be encountered. 
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

2 

2.0 Introduction 

2.1 Purpose of the PESA and Involved Parties 

This PESA documents the evaluation of the Project area for indications of “recognized 

environmental conditions” (REC) An REC is defined by American Society for Testing and 

Materials (ASTM) Practice E 1527-05 as: “The presence or likely presence of any hazardous 

substances or petroleum products on a project site under conditions that indicate an existing 

release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or 

petroleum products into structures on the project site or into the ground, groundwater, or 

surface water of the project site. The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum 

products even under conditions of storage and use in compliance with local and state laws 

and regulations. The term is not intended to include de minimus conditions that generally do 

not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment and that generally 

would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of regulatory 

governmental agencies. Conditions determined to be de minimus are not recognized 

environmental conditions.” 

HDR received authorization from the Iowa Department of Transportation (Iowa DOT) to 

conduct a PESA of the Eola Mainline Improvements Project area, defined as Eola Yard from 

Farnsworth Avenue eastward to Eola Road in the City of Aurora in DuPage and Kane 

Counties, Illinois. In this report, the “Project area” is defined as the Burlington Northern Santa 

Fe Railway (BNSF) Eola Yard between Farnsworth Avenue (the western terminus) and Eola 

Road (the eastern terminus). This PESA has been prepared for the Illinois Department of 

Transportation (Illinois DOT) and Iowa DOT, and only Illinois DOT and Iowa DOT have the 

right to rely on its contents. 

2.2 Scope of Services, Significant Assumptions, and Limitations 

The services provided for this Project consist of the following: 

• Provide a description of the Project area including current land uses. 

• Provide a general description of the topography, soils, geology, and groundwater flow 

direction. 

• Review reasonably ascertainable regulatory information published by federal, state, 

local, tribal, health, and/or environmental agencies pertaining to the Project area. 

• Review historical data sources for the Project area, including aerial photographs, 

topographic maps, fire insurance maps, city directories, and other readily available 

development data. 

• Conduct an area reconnaissance and an environmental review—including a visual 

inspection of adjoining properties—with a focus on indications of hazardous 

substances, petroleum products, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), wells, storage 

tanks, solid waste disposal pits and sumps, and utilities. 

• Interview current owners and occupants of businesses that are located near the 

Project area and are likely to use hazardous materials in their operations and 

interview other persons with knowledge of the development history of the Project 

area. 

• Prepare a written report of the methods, findings, and conclusions. 

The goal of this scope of services is to assist the user in identifying conditions in the Project 

area that may indicate risks regarding hazardous materials storage, disposal, or other 

impacts. The resulting report may qualify the user for relief from liabilities as one of three 
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

3 

“defenses” identified in the 2002 Brownfields Amendments to the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Section 9607 (All 

Appropriate Inquiry subsections). These three defenses include: 

1. The “innocent landowner” defense to potential liabilities under 42 United States Code 

[USC] § 9601 

2. The “contiguous project corridor owner” defense pursuant to 42 USC § 9607q 

3. The “bona fide prospective purchaser” defense pursuant to 42 USC §9607r 

Federal regulations at 40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Part 312, promulgated by the 

United States (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), require that a liability release 

be based (in part) on completion of All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) prior to purchase of a 

property. Those inquiries are documented by Phase I reports, or Environmental Site 

Assessments (ESAs). EPA has agreed that the recently developed ASTM guidance 

(ASTM Practice E 1527-05) specifies and interprets AAI requirements. 

A user is defined by ASTM Practice E 1527-05 as the party seeking to use Practice E 1527 

to complete an environmental site assessment of a project area and may include a potential 

purchaser of land in the project area, a potential tenant of the project area, an owner of land 

in the project area, a lender, or a project area manager. Investigative areas not included in 

the standard ASTM scope of services for environmental site assessments include: asbestos, 

lead-based paint, lead in drinking water, radon or urea formaldehyde, wetland issues, 

regulatory compliance, cultural and historic resources, industrial hygiene, health and safety, 

ecological resources, endangered species, indoor air quality, and high-voltage power lines. 

The scope of services for environmental site assessments also does not include the 

completion of soil borings, installation of groundwater monitoring wells, or collection of soil or 

groundwater samples. Likely sources of vapor intrusion, from potential on-site or off-site 

sources, are identified. State and national policies and standards relevant to vapor intrusion 

are in flux and subject to change. 

HDR has made certain assumptions in preparing the scope of this assessment: 

• Data gathered from public information sources (i.e., libraries or public regulatory 

agencies) are accurate and reliable. 

• Site operations reflect site conditions relative to potential releases, and no intentional 

concealment of environmental conditions or releases has occurred. 

• Interview information is directly reported as gathered by the assessor and is limited by 

the accuracy of the interviewee’s recollection and experience. 

• Published geologic information and site observations made by the environmental 

professional are used to estimate likely contaminant migration pathways in the 

subsurface. These estimates by the environmental professional are limited in 

accuracy and are generally cross-referenced with existing information about similar 

sites and environmental releases in the area. 

• Regulatory information is limited to sites discovered after the late 1980s because 

reliable records were not kept by regulatory agencies prior to that time frame. 

Where a REC has resulted from historical uses or conditions, but apparently no longer 

persists at the site, the term “historical REC” is used. 

The findings and conclusions presented in this report are based on the procedures described 

in ASTM Practice E 1527-05, informal discussions with various agencies, a review of the 

available literature cited in this report, conditions noted at the time of this PESA, and HDR’s 

interpretation of the information obtained as part of this PESA. The findings and conclusions 
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

4 

are limited to the specific Project and properties described in this report, and by the accuracy 

and completeness of the information provided by others. 

An environmental site assessment cannot entirely eliminate uncertainty regarding the 

potential for RECs. Conducting this assessment is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, 

uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection with a project area within 

reasonable limits of time and cost. In conducting its services, HDR used a degree of care 

and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of its 

profession practicing in the same locality. No other warranty is made or intended. This PESA 

generally conforms to the level of documentation required in ASTM Practice E 1527-05. 

Deviations from the ASTM standard included deletion of certain records sources deemed to 

be inapplicable, or of limited value, to the specific needs of this client. 

3.0 Site Description 

3.1 Location and Legal Description 

Eola Yard is located at 865 McClure Avenue, in the City of Aurora, DuPage and Kane 

counties, Illinois. The site is approximately 150 acres. 

3.2 Site and Vicinity Characteristics 

The 1998 Naperville and Aurora North, Illinois, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle 

maps indicate that the site is approximately 710 feet above mean sea level. The topography 

near the site slopes downward from the north and northeast toward the south and southwest. 

The topography and geographic location suggest that shallow groundwater flows south and 

southwest. 

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service’s soil survey soil 

maps for the State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) Database, the soil near the site is mainly 

composed of Morley silt loam. The Morley silt loam complex consists of moderately fine or 

fine textures, layers impeding downward movement of water, and poorly drained soils of 

hydrologic group Class C, which have a layer of low hydraulic conductivity. Depth to the 

water table is 3 to 6 feet below ground surface (bgs), and the depth to bedrock, on average, 

is greater than 5 feet bgs. 

The soil lies on top of rock that formed during the Silurian period of the Paleozoic era, 

approximately 543 to 248 million years ago. 

3.3 Description of Structures, Roads, and Other Site Improvements 

The site is improved with three buildings, a front lawn, a concrete walkway, a paved driveway 

and parking area, a side lawn area, and the rail yard. The rail yard has two main line tracks 

and two yard lead tracks at the west end of the yard as well as three main line tracks and 

four yard leads at the east end of the yard. Indian Creek runs through the site through 

culverts or open ditches, flowing out of the site to the southwest.. 

3.4 Area Geology and Hydrogeology 

Groundwater flow in the Project area is expected to be to the south or southwest. Depth to 

the groundwater in the Project area is 3 feet to 6 feet. Approximately 34 wells are located 

within approximately 0.25 miles of the Project area, and a federal USGS well and public 

water supply system are located within approximately 0.25 miles of the Project area. 
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

5 

4.0 User-Provided Information 

The user of the report provided a proposed improvements map and aerial imagery of the 

Project area. In addition, in response to a request for information on the site, the user of the 

report stated that it: 

• Is aware of environmental cleanups currently taking place in the Project area. The 

sites have been enrolled in the Illinois EPA Site Remediation Program. 

• Is unaware of any environmental cleanup liens against the property. 

• Has knowledge of diesel fuel and used oil that is present on the property. 

• Has no knowledge of any spills or chemical releases on the property other than those 

that have been reported to the regulatory agencies and are under remediation 

through Illinois EPA. 

• Has knowledge of the presence of contamination on the property. 

5.0 Records Review 

5.1 Environmental Records Review 

Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), was contracted by HDR to complete a database 

search of federal, state, and tribal environmental records for the Project site. The federal and 

state databases searched consisted of the following: 

Federal ASTM Standard 

• NPL – National Priority List 

• Proposed NPL – Proposed National Priority List 

• Delisted NPL – National Priority List Deletions 

• CERCLIS – Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Information System 

• CERCLIS-NFRAP – CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned 

• CORRACTS – Corrective Action Report 

• RCRA TSD – Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Treatment, Storage, and 

Disposal Facilities 

• RCRA Small Quantity Generators (SQG) 

• RCRA Large Quantity Generators (LQG) 

• Institutional Control/Engineering Controls Registries 

• ERNS – Emergency Response Notification System 

Federal ASTM Supplemental 

• NPL Recovery – Federal Superfund Liens 

• DOD – Department of Defense Sites 

• FUDS – Formerly Used Defense Sites 

• U.S. Brownfields – Listing of Brownfields Sites 

• CONSENT – Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees 

• ROD – Records of Decision 

• UMTRA – Uranium Mill Tailing Sites 

• ODI – Open Dump Inventory 

• SSTS – Section 7 Tracking Systems 

• ICIS – Integrated Compliance Information System 

• MINES – Mines Master Index File 

• HMIRS – Hazardous Materials Incident Report System 

• TRIS – Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System 
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

6 

• TSCA – Toxic Substances Control Act 

• FTTS – FIFRA, TSCA, and EPCRA Tracking Systems 

• PADS – PCB Activity Database System 

• MLTS – Material Licensing Tracking System 

• FINDS – Facility Index System 

• RAATS – RCRA Administration Action Tracking System 

State ASTM Standard 

• CAT – Illinois Category List 

• SHWS – State Hazardous Waste Sites 

• SWF/LF – Directory of Solid Waste/Landfill Facilities 

• IL NIPC – Active and Inactive Solid Waste Disposal Sites in Northeastern Illinois 

• State LUST – Illinois Leaking Underground Storage Tanks 

• State UST – Illinois Underground Storage Tanks 

• VCP – Voluntary Cleanup Program 

• IL Spills – Reported Chemical Spills and Incidents 

• DRYCLEANERS – Drycleaner Facility Listing 

• BROWNFIELDS – Brownfields Tracking System 

• IL AIRS – Illinois Air Quality Database 

• Brownfields 

• Tier 2 

Tribal ASTM Standard 

• INDIAN RESERV – Indian Reservations 

• INDIAN LUST – Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land 

• INDIAN UST – Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land 

A computerized environmental information database search was performed for the Project 

site by EDR on June 23, 2010. The databases searched included federal, state, local, tribal, 

and EDR proprietary databases as defined by ASTM E 1527-05. The results of the database 

search are summarized in the following table and paragraphs. A complete copy of the EDR 

environmental database report is included in Appendix C. 
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

7 

Table 1 – Summary of Environmental Database Search 

Database Description Facilities 

Listed 

Sites of 

Concern 

to the 

Project 

Federal 

NPL 

The National Priorities List (NPL) is EPA’s database of uncontrolled 

or abandoned hazardous waste facilities that have been listed for 

priority remedial actions under the Superfund program. 

0 0 

Delisted NPL 

The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency 

Plan (NCP) established the criteria that EPA uses to delete sites 

from the NPL. 

0 0 

CERCLIS/ 

NFRAP 

The CERCLIS database is a compilation of facilities that EPA has 

investigated or is currently investigating for a release or threatened 

release of hazardous substances pursuant to the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act 

(CERCLA) of 1980. No Further Remedial Action Planned (NFRAP) 

refers to facilities that have been removed and archived from its 

inventory of CERCLA sites. 

2 2 

RCRA 

CORRACTS/ 

TSD 

EPA maintains a database of Resource Conservation and 

Recovery Act (RCRA) facilities associated with treatment, storage, 

and disposal (TSD) of hazardous materials that are undergoing 

“corrective action.” A “corrective action” order is issued when there 

has been a release of hazardous waste or constituents into the 

environment from a RCRA facility. 

1 1 

RCRA NonCORRACTS/ 

TSD 

The RCRA Non-CORRACTS/TSD Database is a compilation by 

EPA of facilities that report storage, transportation, treatment, or 

disposal of hazardous waste. Unlike the RCRA CORRACTS/TSD 

database, the RCRA Non-CORRACTS/TSD database does not 

include RCRA facilities where corrective action is required. 

0 0 

RCRA INFO 

The RCRA INFO database, maintained by EPA, lists facilities that 

generate hazardous waste as part of their normal business 

practices. Generators are listed as large, small, or conditionally 

exempt. Large quantity generators (LQG) produce at least 1,000 

kg/month of nonacutely hazardous waste or 1 kg/month of acutely 

hazardous waste. Small quantity generators (SQG) produce 100 to 

1,000 kg/month of nonacutely hazardous waste. Conditionally 

exempt small quantity generators (CESQG) are those that 

generate less than 100 kg/month of nonacutely hazardous waste. 

14 3 

RCRA-nongen 

The RCRA info database includes information on sites which 

generate, transport, store, treat, and/or dispose of hazardous waste 

as defined by RCRA. Non-generators do not presently generate 

hazardous waste. 

9 6 

ERNS 

Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) records and 

stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous 

substances. 

4 4 

HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System (HMIRS) 

contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to USDOT. 4 4 

US ENG 

Controls A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. 0 0 

US INST 

Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. 0 0 

DOD U.S. Department of Defense Sites. 0 0 

FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites. 0 0 
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

8 

Database Description Facilities 

Listed 

Sites of 

Concern 

to the 

Project 

U.S. 

Brownfields 

A brownfield site is an industrial or commercial project corridor that 

is abandoned, inactive, or underutilized, on which expansion or 

redevelopment is complicated because of the actual or perceived 

environmental contamination. 

0 0 

CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees. 0 0 

ROD Record of Decision. 0 0 

UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites. 0 0 

ODI Open Dump Inventory. 0 0 

SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems. 0 0 

ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System. 0 0 

MINES Mines Master Index File. 0 0 

PADS 

PCB Activity Database System (PADS) identifies generators, 

transporters, commercial storers, and/or brokers and disposers of 

PCBs who are required to notify EPA of such activities. 

0 0 

RAATS 

RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System (RAATS) contains 

records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA 

pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil 

actions brought by EPA. 

0 0 

MLTS 

MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) 

and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites that possess or use 

radioactive materials and are subject to NRC licensing 

requirements. 

0 0 

TRIS 

Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System (TRIS) identifies 

facilities that release toxic chemicals to the air, water, and land in 

reportable quantities under SARA Title III, Section 313. 

1 1 

FINDS 

Facility Index System/Facility Registry System (FINDS) contains 

both facility information and ‘pointers’ to other sources that contain 

further detail. 

31 12 

TSCA 

Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) identifies manufacturers and 

importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical 

Substance Inventory list. 

0 0 

FTTS 

FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System, Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and 

Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)/Toxic Substances Control Act (SCA). 

FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement 

actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA, and 

EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). 

1 1 

State and Local 

CAT State and tribal equivalent of the National Priorities List (NPL). 1 0 

SHWS 

State 

Hazardous 

Waste List 

Illinois EPA Superfund Programs List (SPL) is the state version of 

the federal CERCLIS list. Sites on the SPL list come from three 

sources: the Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund (WQARF) 

list and potential sites WQARF list, the federal Superfund list (NPL), 

and Department of Defense sites that require Superfund oversight. 

1 1 

SWF/LF 

State Landfill/ 

Historical 

Landfill 

The Illinois EPA maintains a list of Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill 

Sites (SWF/LF). 1 0 

IL NIPC 

The Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission maintains an 

inventory of active and inactive solid waste disposal sites, based on 

state, local government and historical archive data. 

1 0 
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

9 

Database Description Facilities 

Listed 

Sites of 

Concern 

to the 

Project 

State LUST 

Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) Site List – Illinois 

EPA provides a computer-generated database of the LUSTs within 

the specified area based on LUST incident reports and cleanup 

actions underway. 

31 7 

State UST The Illinois State Fire Marshal maintains a STC Facility List. This 

list includes Underground Storage Tanks. 20 5 

VCP Site 

Remediation 

Program 

Illinois EPA’s Site Remediation Program Database includes all 

sites currently enrolled in the state Voluntary Cleanup Program. 2 0 

IL Spills Lists chemical spills and incidents reported to the Office of 

Emergency Response. 2 2 

DRYCLEANE

RS 

A listing of drycleaning facilities in Illinois that applied for a license 

through the Illinois Drycleaner Environmental Response Trust 

Fund. 

3 0 

IL AIRS A listing of air permits and emissions information. 7 1 

Brownfields 

A brownfield site is an industrial or commercial project corridor that 

is abandoned, inactive, or underutilized, on which expansion or 

redevelopment is complicated because of the actual or perceived 

environmental contamination. 

0 0 

Tier 2 A listing of facilities which store or manufacture hazardous 

materials and submit a chemical inventory report. 3 0 

INDIAN 

RESERV Indian Reservations. 0 0 

INDIAN LUST LUST on Indian Lands. 0 0 

INDIAN UST UST on Indian Lands. 0 0 

5.2 Summary of Listed Records of Concern to the Project 

Federal Records 

CERCLIS Sites 

A review of the federal CERCLIS list, as provided by EDR and dated June 23, 2010, has 

revealed that Eola Yard is listed as an archived CERCLIS site and is not on the NPL. An 

adjacent property, PC Display Finishers, Inc. at 1666 N. Dearborn Ave., is also an archived 

CERCLIS site and is not on the NPL. 

RCRA CORRACTS Sites 

A review of the federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list, as provided by EDR and dated June 

23, 2010, has revealed that an adjacent property, PC Display Finishers, Inc. at 1666 N. 

Dearborn Ave., is a CORRACTS site. 

RCRA Generators Sites 

A review of the federal RCRA generators list, as provided by EDR and dated June 23, 2010, 

has revealed that three adjacent properties have generators on-site. Midstate Express, 1859 

Plain Ave., is listed as a RCRA small quantity generator site. Fernandos Body Works, 1660 

Dearborn Ave., and Dur-O-Wall Wire, Inc., 625 Crane Ave, are listed as RCRA conditionally 

exempt small quantity generator sites. 
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

10 

RCRA-nongen Sites 

A review of the RCRA-nongen list, as provided by EDR and dated June 23, 2010, has 

revealed that Eola Yard is listed twice and four adjacent properties are listed as RCRAnongen sites. The adjacent properties that are listed as RCRA-nongen sites include: 

• PC Display Finishers, Inc. (1666 N. Dearborn Ave.) 

• BP Amoco (1207 N. Eola Rd.) 

• Aurora Fast Freight, Inc. (1859 Plain Ave.) 

• Best Blast Corp. (1500 Dearborn Ave.) 

ERNS List 

A review of the federal ERNS list, as provided by EDR and dated June 23, 2010, has 

revealed that Eola Yard is listed twice. The first occurrence was on September 3, 1992 

because of waste oil/lubricant that was spilled when a storage tank was overfilled. The 

second occurrence was on February 17, 1994 when 500 gallons of oil was spilled. 

Two adjacent properties are also listed on the federal ERNS list. At 1901 Plain Ave., an 

unknown amount of an unknown oil was discovered under a slab at an auto facility on June 

19, 2009. The property at 625 Crane Ave. is on the federal ERNS list because of a spill of 

400 gallons of hydrochloric acid on June 27, 1994 due to a seal failure. 

HMIRS Sites 

A review of the Hazardous Materials Incident Report System, as provided by EDR and dated 

June 23, 2010, has revealed that four hazardous materials spill incidents occurred on Eola 

Yard property. The earliest incident occurred on July 27, 1992 when approximately 1.0 gallon 

of caustic soda was spilled from a tank car. On May 22, 1994 12.5 gallons of chlorine were 

spilled from a leaking tank car valve. The incident that occurred on May 24, 1998 involved 

the release of a vapor of cold tar distillates. A 4.0 gallon leak of hydrogen peroxide occurred 

on July 21, 1998 from a tank car. The released product evaporated and never entered the 

ground. 

FINDS Sites 

A review of the FINDS list, as provided by EDR and dated June 23, 2010, has revealed that 

Eola Yard, along with 11 adjacent properties, is on the FINDS list. The adjacent properties 

identified as FINDS sites include: 

• Dukane Precast, Inc (2000 Plain Ave.) 

• Dan/Veber Goodwin (Poss Rd. and 4th St.) 

• P.D.I. Industries Inc. (1666 Dearborn Ave.) 

• Fernando Body Works (1660 Dearborn Ave.) 

• PC Display Finishers, Inc. (1666 N. Dearborn Ave.) 

• BP Amoco (1207 N. Eola Rd.) 

• U-Pull-It (1901 Plain Ave.) 

• National Rent-A-Fence (1894 Plain Ave.) 

• Aurora Fast Freight, Inc. (1859 Plain Ave.) 

• Midstates Express (1859 Plain Ave.) 

• Dur-O-Wal Wire Inc. (625 Crane Ave.) 

TRIS Sites 

A review of the TRIS list, as provided by EDR and dated June 23, 2010, has revealed that 

the adjacent property, Dur-O-Wal, Inc. located at 625 Crane Ave. is a TRIS site. 
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

11 

FTTS and HIST FTTS Sites 

A review of the FTTS list, as provided by EDR and dated June 23, 2010, has revealed that 

the adjacent property, Dur-O-Wal, Inc. located at 625 Crane Ave. is a FTTS and HIST FTTS 

site. 

State and Local Records 

SHWS List 

A review of the SHWS list, as provided by EDR and dated June 23, 2010, has revealed that 

Eola Yard is listed as a SHWS site due to a railroad locomotive collision. On January 20, 

1993, a BNSF train collided head-on with a Southern Pacific train in Eola Yard, spilling 

approximately 10,000 gallons of diesel fuel. The contaminated soil was moved to an onsite 

location for land farming and the land farm is pending closure. In-situ remediation was also 

performed. However, contamination has migrated off-site to an adjacent property. This site is 

enrolled in the Illinois EPA Site Remediation Program. 

LUST Sites 

A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR and dated June 23, 2010, has revealed that 

Eola Yard is listed two times and four adjacent properties are also listed. One other LUST 

incident is listed in 1993, which is a BNSF leasehold property located outside of Eola Yard. 

One LUST case on Eola Yard property involving gasoline was opened in 1992 and closed in 

1993. Another LUST case on Eola Yard property involved fuel oil. This case was opened in 

1989 and closed in 2005. 

Adjacent to Eola Yard is P.D.I. Industries, located at 1666 Dearborn Ave., which is listed as a 

LUST site. The case involved fuel oil, was opened in 1992, and closed in 1993. National 

Rent-A-Fence is an adjacent property located at 1894 Plain Ave. The LUST case for this 

adjacent property was opened in 1994 and the more recent Low Priority Corrective Action 

Plan was approved with modification in 1999. Also adjacent to Eola Yard is Aurora Fast 

Freight, Inc. located at 1859 Plain Ave. The LUST case for the Aurora Fast Freight, Inc. 

property was opened in 1998 and has not yet been closed. The fourth property is Jard Gas 

located at 1302 Plain Ave. The LUST case for this property was opened in 1998 and closed 

in 1999. 

The other LUST case involving diesel fuel was opened in 1992 and a No Further 

Remediation letter has not been issued. This is a BNSF leasehold property located outside of 

Eola Yard; the name is referred to as Wholesale Auto. 

UST Sites 

A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR and dated June 23, 2010, has revealed that 

Eola Yard is a UST site and there are four UST sites located adjacent to the Project area. 

The USTs located on Eola Yard property were removed in the early 1990s. 

One of the adjacent UST sites is Hollis Robert, located at 1666 Dearborn Ave., where the 

UST was removed in 1992. The adjacent 7-Eleven property located at 1202 N. Eola Rd. 

contained a UST that was removed in 1992. Two USTs were located on adjacent property for 

National Rent-A-Fence at 1894 Plain Ave.; both were removed in 1994. Aurora Fast Freight, 

located at 1859 Plain Ave. adjacent to Eola Yard, was identified as having two USTs that 

were removed in 1998 and a third UST that was never installed. 

SPILLS Sites 

A review of the SPILLS list, as provided by EDR and dated June 23, 2010, has revealed that 

Eola Yard and one adjacent property, 1901 Plain Ave., are SPILLS sites. 
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

12 

AIRS Sites 

A review of the AIRS list, as provided by EDR and dated June 23, 2010, has revealed that 

the adjacent property, Dur-O-Wal, Inc., located at 625 Crane Ave., is an AIRS site. 

5.3 Local Government Information 

HDR did not perform interviews with any local government representatives. 

5.4 Historical Use Information 

The objective of reviewing historical use information is to develop a history of previous land 

uses in the vicinity of the Project area and to assess these uses for potential hazardous 

materials impacts that may affect the Project. HDR reviewed those historical sources that 

were readily available and likely to provide useful information, given the time and cost 

constraints inherent in ESA projects. 

Fire Insurance Maps 

Fire insurance maps are produced by private fire insurance companies to indicate uses of an 

area on specified dates. HDR requested fire insurance maps from EDR, the copyright holder 

for the Sanborn map collection; however, no Sanborn fire insurance map coverage exists for 

the Project corridor. 

City Directory Information 

City Directory searches were not conducted as part of the scope of work for this Project. 

Historical Aerial Photographs 

Historical aerial photographs are valuable for the environmental assessor to review features 

of properties along the Project corridor over a long period of time. HDR reviewed historical 

aerial photographs provided by EDR. Historical aerial photographs were reviewed from 1998 

back to 1949. Coverage was available for 11 years of that 49-year span, with the longest gap 

in coverage being 13 years (between 1980 and 1993). Information relating to observed 

features or the listed risk sites is presented below. 

1956 The area is predominantly agricultural land. The rail yard is present. The industrial 

properties located on the west end of the rail yard are minimal.

1962 Adjacent properties remain largely undeveloped.

1971 Adjacent properties remain largely undeveloped.

1978 The area remains predominantly agricultural land; however, more industrial 

properties located on the west end of the rail yard are developed.

1984 The properties remain mainly as they were in 1978.

1988 The properties remain mainly as they were in 1984.

1994 The area remains predominantly agricultural land; however, more industrial 

properties located on the west end of the rail yard are developed.

Historical Topographic Maps 

Historical topographic maps provide an overview of the area relative to potential previous 

land uses. HDR reviewed historical topographic maps of the Project corridor and adjoining 

properties for the years 1949, 1950, 1953 1954, 1962, 1964, 1972, 1978, and 1980, 1993, 
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

13 

and 1998. These maps served to verify the information gathered in the historic aerial 

photograph review. 

5.5 Environmental Liens and Additional Information 

No information regarding the chain-of-title ownership history or environmental liens recorded 

against the Project corridor was provided by the user. Environmental lien searches were not 

conducted as part of the scope of work for this Project. 

5.6 Summary of Previous Environmental Investigations 

No previous environmental investigations were reviewed for this report. 

6.0 Site Reconnaissance and Interviews 

6.1 Site Reconnaissance 

On June 23, 2010, HDR conducted a reconnaissance of the site. HDR representatives were 

escorted through the site by BNSF personnel. The site reconnaissance was conducted via 

vehicles with stops at key areas within the rail yard. The BNSF rail yard is improved and 

contains three buildings, a front lawn and side lawn, concrete walkway, paved driveway and 

parking area, and the rail yard. The rail yard has two main line tracks and two yard lead 

tracks at the west end of the yard, and three main line tracks and four yard leads at the east 

end of the yard. 

The interiors of the three buildings were not observed. However, according to the owner, the 

main building is used for office/meeting spaces; the interior of the building was being 

remodeled at the time of the site reconnaissance. The second building is primarily used for 

storage. The third building is used for limited maintenance on the maintenance-of-way 

equipment. Used oil is containerized and sent offsite. According to the owner there are no 

pits or an oil/water separator onsite. 

A pile of used tires was observed on the western edge of the rail yard, underneath the 

Farnsworth Road viaduct (see Photograph 1). Areas around the northwest exterior of the 

yard were used to store items such steel, and extra maintenance-of-way equipment (see 

Photograph 2). Three above-ground storage tanks (ASTs) and one 55-gallon drum were 

observed onsite (Photograph 3). The ASTs contain diesel fuel and used oil. The diesel fuel is 

used for the maintenance-of-way equipment. The 55-gallon drum was labeled as purge water 

(See Photograph 4). The owner confirmed that monitoring wells were sampled as part of an 

ongoing remediation activity through the Illinois EPA State Site Unit. 

A ditch was observed running through the Project area (Photograph 5). The drainage ditch 

drains water from the site and runs through the Indian Creek Industrial Park located to the 

south and west of the Project area (Photograph 6). The drainage ditch is labeled as Indian 

Creek (Photograph 7). 

6.2 Interviews 

Site Interviews 

HDR personnel met with BNSF representatives during the site reconnaissance on June 23, 

2010. These representatives referred HDR to BNSF’s manager of environmental operations 

for Illinois, Mr. Jim Cunnigham. Mr. Cunningham was interviewed by telephone on June 28, 

2010. The results of that interview are summarized below. 
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

14 

Mr. Cunningham reported that the site has been an active remediation site due to the 

collision of two trains in the early 1990s. Remediation of this area has been ongoing. He 

reported that soils removed from the area were land farmed on site. Mr. Cunningham stated 

that the work has been conducted through the Illinois EPA. He stated that there are no 

underground storage tanks located on site. Underground storage tanks were removed from 

the fueling yard area and were determined not to have leaked by the fire marshal on site 

during the removal activities. Mr. Cunningham did state that the facility has an NPDES and 

Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. The facility also has an SPCC plan. Mr. Cunningham 

indicated that BNSF-leased properties off of Industrial Road had some LUSTs. BNSF is 

currently working under the Illinois EPA State Site Unit to remediate those LUSTs. Mr. 

Cunningham stated that Michael Woolridge of the BNSF would have additional information 

regarding the on-going remediation activities at the site. 

HDR interviewed Mr. Woolridge on July 6, 2010. He stated that BNSF is currently working on 

two remediation sites through the Illinois EPA. These sites are referred to as the Indian 

Creek Development, where mitigation of contaminants occurred from the BNSF property, 

and the Aurora Wholesale Auto, a BNSF leasehold property that contained a LUST. Mr. 

Woolridge stated that area drinking water wells were sampled in 2009 and that BNSF will be 

sampling Indian Creek sediments in 2010 as part of the remediation activities. Mr. Woolridge 

indicated that there are groundwater monitoring wells on site. 

HDR interviewed Mr. Steve Skare, EMR, an environmental consultant working for the BNSF 

at Eola Yard. Mr. Skare stated that there was an AST release at the Eola Yard around 2001. 

A French drain system was installed to remediate the site. Mr. Skare also stated that there 

was a 2008 diesel release from a locomotive at the east end of the rail yard. This release is 

currently under the jurisdiction of the Illinois EPA. 

Offsite Interviews 

HDR did not conduct offsite interviews regarding the Project area. 

6.3 Known Current and Past Uses of the Site and Adjoining Properties 

The initial conversion of the site to a rail use was in 1848 when a rail line was constructed 

through the Project limits. Additional facilities and right-of-way for rail use increased 

incrementally over time. Yard activities on the Project site are documented as far back as the 

1870s. The current yard track arrangements and track locations are different from the original 

yard. This use is considered a historical REC. 

The majority of properties adjacent to the rail yard were primarily used for agricultural 

purposes, except for properties at the west end, which have been industrial since at least 

1956. By 1971, parcels along Eola Road north of the railroad tracks, and more industrial 

properties at the west end of the yard, began to be developed. Currently, the properties north 

and south of the yard at the middle east end are residential. Industrial properties exist 

adjacent to the west end of the rail yard. Historical use of the adjacent sites for agricultural 

purposes from 1930 through approximately 1955 likely included the application of pesticides 

in accordance with permitted uses. Because that use would, of late, have led to an agency 

requirement for testing prior to reusing the site, it constitutes an REC. 

6.4 Utilities and PCBs 

HDR did not observe signs indicating subsurface utilities other than typical municipal utilities 

such as water, sewer, electrical, telecommunications cable, and gas. One pole-mounted and 

one slab-on-grade mounted transformer were noted, but no large power substations or step-
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

15 

down transformers were noted. Signal bungalows are located within the rail yard. Given the 

age of the development of the area, it is unlikely that PCB-containing transformers would be 

present. Additionally, no spills or hazardous materials response events were noted in the 

EDR report. 

7.0 Data Gap Analysis 

The ASTM E 1527-05 standard requires a listing of “data gaps” encountered during the 

investigative process that may affect the validity of the conclusions drawn by the 

environmental professional. The standard also requires that the environmental professional 

estimate the relative importance of the data gaps. Generally, gaps in available data are 

related to the availability of historical data sources for specific sites of concern. The 

environmental professional uses multiple historical data sources as a method to provide 

coverage for data gaps. Historical information is collected on a recurring basis, and the 

passage of time between data sets may or may not constitute a significant gap in data 

coverage. For this Project, the following items may constitute a data gap as defined by 

ASTM: 

• Absence of Sanborn fire insurance maps 

• Absence of aerial photography prior to 1956 

The inability to obtain and review the Sanborn fire insurance maps, and the lack of aerial 

photography prior to 1956, do not appear to present significant data gaps because of the 

presence of other supporting historical information and the lack of development in the area 

prior to 1956. 

8.0 Findings and Conclusions 

HDR has conducted a Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment (PESA) of the Project 

area for the Eola Mainline Improvements, identified as Eola Yard in the City of Aurora, 

DuPage and Kane counties, Illinois. The PESA was performed in general conformance with 

the scope and limitations of A Manual for Conducting Preliminary Environmental Site 

Assessments for Illinois Department of Transportation Highway Projects and ASTM Practice 

E 1527-05. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described previously in this 

report. 

HDR personnel did observe recognized environmental conditions (RECs), as defined in 

ASTM Practice E 1527-05, in connection with the Project area. The rail yard is listed in 

databases for CERCLIS sites, ERNS, SHWS, LUST, UST, HMIRS, Spills, RCRA-nongen, 

and FINDS for incidents that have occurred on the Project site. The entire rail yard is 

considered a REC due to the hazardous materials spills, its historical railroad use, and the 

materials transported through the yard. 

The adjacent properties on both sides of the western end of the yard are industrial 

properties. Several are listed in the environmental databases and would be considered RECs 

due to their current and historic uses. 

9.0 Recommendations 

Recommendations included in this report have been developed through the investigative 

procedures described in the Scope of Services, Significant Assumptions, and Limitations

section of this report. These findings should be reviewed within the context of the limitations 

provided in the Limitations section. Based on the location and specific details of the identified 
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

16 

risk sites, HDR has identified RECs on the Project site. This conclusion has led to the 

inclusion of the following statement as required by ASTM E 1527-05: 

HDR has performed a Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment in general 

conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E 1527-05 of the Project 

area for the Eola Mainline Improvements, defined as Eola Yard, 865 McClure 

Road, City of Aurora, Kane and DuPage counties, Illinois. Any exceptions to 

or deletions from these practices are described in previous sections of this 

report. This report has revealed evidence of RECs in connection with the 

Project site. 

HDR has concluded that the risk of contamination from the site is high. Because of this 

conclusion, HDR recommends that the Illinois and Iowa departments of transportation notify 

the selected construction contractor that subsurface impacts may be present within the 

construction zone. The construction contractor should be prepared for the possibility of 

encountering affected soils, and be prepared to detect, excavate, document, and dispose of 

affected materials in compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations if 

contaminated soils are encountered. 

10.0 Qualifications of Environmental Professionals 

10.1 Signatures and Qualifications 

We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition 

of environmental professional as defined in Section 312.10 of 42 Code of Federal 

Regulations [C.F.R.] Part 312. This PESA was conducted under the supervision of a qualified 

environmental professional. 

The preceding report has been prepared in general conformance with standard industry 

practice for performance of Environmental Site Assessments and includes the applicable 

portions of the investigation procedures codified in ASTM E 1527-05, Standard Practice for 

Environmental Site Assessments: Environmental Site Assessment Process. The end user of 

this report may rely on the contents, findings, and conclusions to be accurate within the 

limitations stated in this report and in the ASTM standard. The report also complies with 

specific requirements supplied by the client. 

Qualified Environmental Professional 

Ms. Robin Martel, LEED AP 

Transportation Planner 
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

17 

Qualifications of Environmental Professionals 

This PESA was performed by the following HDR personnel: 

Ms. Robin Martel, LEED AP, HDR’s qualified environmental professional, as defined by 

ASTM Practice E 1527-05, has more than 17 years of experience in the assessment and 

remediation of impacted properties and compliance with environmental regulations. She has 

a BS in Geology from Ohio State University. Ms. Martel specializes in the investigation of 

hazardous-materials-impacted properties for municipal and state agencies, as well as for 

commercial clients. She is highly knowledgeable of federal, state, and local environmental 

regulations and standards. 

Ms. Kirsten Mawhinney, P.E., has more than 5 years of experience working on 

environmental studies for transportation projects. She has a BS in Civil Engineering from 

Purdue University. 

Qualifications of QA/QC Review Professionals 

Reviews for quality assurance and quality control were performed by the following HDR 

personnel: 

Mr. Todd Wilson, Chemist, HDR’s qualified environmental professional, as defined by ASTM 

Practice E 1527-05, has more than 18 years of experience in the assessment and 

remediation of impacted properties and compliance with environmental regulations. He has 

an MS in Pharmaceutical Science from The University of Nebraska Medical Center and a BS 

in Chemistry from The University of Nebraska-Lincoln. His experience covers the 

assessment of agricultural land, to multigenerational industrial properties, to large Superfund 

Sites. He is knowledgeable of federal, state, and local environmental regulations and 

standards. 

11.0 References 

A Manual for Conducting Preliminary Environmental Site Assessments for Illinois Department 

of Transportation Highway Projects, 1996. 

ASTM Practice E 1527-05. 2005. Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: 

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. 

Environmental Data Resources, Inc., Report. 2010. Eola Yard Improvements Project Level 

EA. The EDR Radius Map Report, Inquiry Number 2800629.2s. June 23, 2010. 

Interview. June 2010. Jim Cunningham, BNSF. 

Interview. July 2010. Michael Woolridge, BNSF. 

Interview. July 2010. Steve Skare, EMR 

Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

Appendix A 

Figures

KANE CO DUPAGE CO

Hill Yard

Aurora Transportation Center

West Yard

Eola Yard

East Yard

Eola

MP 33.4

West Eola

MP 35.3

DATE

FIGURE

July 2010

1

Z:\Projects\IDOT\115305_ARRA_HighSpRailGrant_App\map_docs\mxd\Eola_Yard\Eola_Yard_Vicinty.mxd\july10\jcm

Eola Main Line Improvements Vicinity

Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

0.5 0.25 0 0.5

Miles

Scale

Legend

Proposed Main Line Improvements

Eola Yard Environmental Survey Limits
Proposed Main Line

Improvements

KANE CO DUPAGE CO

PC Display Finishers

(12/04/1992)

Aurora Eola Derailment

(1/20/1993)

AST Release

(6/1/2001)

U-Pull It 

6/19/2009)

2000 Gallon Diesel Fuel Release

(10/27/2008)

DATE

FIGURE

July 2010

2

Z:\Projects\IDOT\115305_ARRA_HighSpRailGrant_App\map_docs\mxd\Eola_Yard\RESs.mxd\july10\jcm

Eola Main Line Improvements Recognized

Environmental Conditions

0.3 0.15 0 0.3

Miles

Scale

Legend

Proposed Main Line Improvements

Eola Yard Environmental Survey Limits

REC Site

Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

Appendix B 

Site Photographs

Photograph 1: Used tires underneath Farnsworth Road Viaduct 

(Looking west)

Photograph 2: Maintenance of Way equipment and used oil tank 

(Looking east)
Photograph 3: Above ground storage tanks on site. 

(Looking northeast)

Photograph 4: 55-gallon drum labeled as purge water. 

(Looking east) 
Photograph 5: Drainage ditch running through Eola Yard 

(Looking east)

Photograph 6: Indian Creek leaving Eola Yard and running through Indian Creek Industrial Park 

(Looking southwest)
Photograph 7: Sign marking Indian Creek as Kane County Stream 

(Looking southwest) 
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

Appendix C 

EDR Information 

FORM-STD-ALV

®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR TMpaM suidaR RDE ehT

440 Wheelers Farms Road

Milford, CT 06461

Toll Free: 800.352.0050

www.edrnet.com

Eola Yard Improvements Project Level EA

Eola Yard Improvements Project Level EA

Aurora, IL 60504

Inquiry Number: 2800629.2s

June 23, 2010
SECTION PAGE

Executive Summary ES1

Overview Map 2

Detail Map 3

Map Findings Summary 4

Map Findings 7

Orphan Summary 248

Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1

GEOCHECK ADDENDUM

Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1

Physical Setting Source Summary A-2

Physical Setting Source Map A-9

Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-10

Physical Setting Source Records Searched A-70

TC2800629.2s Page 1

Thank you for your business.

Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050

with any questions or comments.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice

This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data

Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from

other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL

DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,

MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL

ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,

ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,

CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY

LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,

environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor

should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I

Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any

property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2010 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole

or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other

trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TC2800629.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).

The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards

and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for

Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-05) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of

environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.

TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION

ADDRESS

EOLA YARD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT LEVEL EA

AURORA, IL 60504

COORDINATES

Latitude (North): 41.772700 - 41 ̊ 46’ 21.7’’

Longitude (West): 88.258300 - 88 ̊ 15’ 29.9’’

Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 16

UTM X (Meters): 395416.7

UTM Y (Meters): 4625092.0

Elevation: 709 ft. above sea level

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY

Target Property Map: 41088-G3 AURORA NORTH, IL

Most Recent Revision: 1998

East Map: 41088-G2 NAPERVILLE, IL

Most Recent Revision: 1998

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT

Portions of Photo from: 2005, 2006

Source: USDA

TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS

The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.

DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES

No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government

records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the

following databases:

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

Federal NPL site list

NPL National Priority List
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TC2800629.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2

Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites

NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens

Federal Delisted NPL site list

Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions

Federal CERCLIS list

CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System

FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing

Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list

RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal

Federal RCRA generators list

RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators

Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries

US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List

US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls

State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists

LF SPECIAL WASTE Special Waste Site List

State and tribal leaking storage tank lists

INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

State and tribal registered storage tank lists

INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing

State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries

ENG CONTROLS Sites with Engineering Controls

State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites

INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing

State and tribal Brownfields sites

BROWNFIELDS Municipal Brownfields Redevelopment Grant Program Project Descriptions

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

Local Brownfield lists

US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TC2800629.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites

DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations

ODI Open Dump Inventory

LF SPECIAL WASTE Special Waste Site List

INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands

Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites

US CDL Clandestine Drug Labs

CDL Meth Drug Lab Site Listing

US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register

Local Land Records

LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information

LUCIS Land Use Control Information System

Other Ascertainable Records

DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data

DOD Department of Defense Sites

FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites

CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees

ROD Records Of Decision

UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites

MINES Mines Master Index File

TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act

SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems

ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System

PADS PCB Activity Database System

RADINFO Radiation Information Database

RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System

UIC Underground Injection Wells

NPDES A Listing of Active Permits

IMPDMENT Surface Impoundment Inventory

INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations

SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing

PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database

COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List

COAL ASH DOE Sleam-Electric Plan Operation Data

EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS

EDR Proprietary Records

Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants

EDR Historical Auto Stations EDR Proprietary Historic Gas Stations

EDR Historical Cleaners EDR Proprietary Historic Dry Cleaners

SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS

Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TC2800629.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on

a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity

should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been

differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.

Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed

data on individual sites can be reviewed.

Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.

Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List

CERC-NFRAP: Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS

sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed

and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List

(NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a

recommendation for listing at a later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard

associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged

to be a potential NPL site.

 A review of the CERC-NFRAP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/23/2009 has revealed that there are

 2 CERC-NFRAP sites within approximately 1.5 miles of the target property.

 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 P C DISPLAY FINISHERS INC 1666 NORTH DEARBORN WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.915 mi.) I70 114

 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD ( 685 MCCLURE ROAD W 1/2 - 1 (0.836 mi.) G34 71

Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list

CORRACTS: CORRACTS is a list of handlers with RCRA Corrective Action Activity. This report shows

which nationally-defined corrective action core events have occurred for every handler that has had corrective

action activity.

 A review of the CORRACTS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/25/2010 has revealed that there is 1

 CORRACTS site within approximately 2 miles of the target property.

 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 P C DISPLAY FINISHERS INC 1666 NORTH DEARBORN WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.915 mi.) I70 114
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TC2800629.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

Federal RCRA generators list

RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting

the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA)

of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or

dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity

generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.

 A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/17/2010 has revealed that there are 5

 RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 1.25 miles of the target property.

 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 BALLCO MFG INC 2375 E LIBERTY ST ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.838 mi.) 42 78

 BILL JACOBS AURORA INC 2170 E NEW YORK ST S 1/2 - 1 (0.882 mi.) H59 103

 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 MIDSTATES EXPRESS 1859 PLAIN AVE WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.592 mi.) C13 15

 PROGRESSIVE TURNING 1680 MOUNTAIN ST W 1/2 - 1 (0.872 mi.) G51 91

 ROCK-TENN CO 705 N FARNSWORTH W 1 - 2 (1.231 mi.) O95 174

RCRA-CESQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting

the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA)

of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or

dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally

exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of

acutely hazardous waste per month.

 A review of the RCRA-CESQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/17/2010 has revealed that there are

 9 RCRA-CESQG sites within approximately 1.25 miles of the target property.

 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 WORLD COLOR DIRECT IMAGING 780 MC CLURE RD W 1/2 - 1 (0.835 mi.) F27 62

 GARTNER COLLISION REVISION 2424 E NEW YORK ST S 1/2 - 1 (0.876 mi.) H53 95

 NORB KORNAK OLDS INC 2175 E NEW YORK ST S 1/2 - 1 (0.882 mi.) H61 105

 FERNANDOS BODY WORKS 1660 DEARBORN AVE WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.909 mi.) I67 111

 STONEBRIDGE COUNTRY CLUB 2705 STONEBRIDGE BLVD N 1 - 2 (1.017 mi.) 82 130

 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC 625 CRANE AVE. WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.790 mi.) E24 55

 SERVICE MFG CORP 1601 E MOUNTAIN ST W 1 - 2 (1.035 mi.) N84 133

 SPEEDWAY 7540 948 N FARNSWORTH RD WNW 1 - 2 (1.242 mi.) P97 226

 VILLAGE MART ONE HOUR CLEANERS 950 N FARNSWORTH AVE WNW 1 - 2 (1.243 mi.) P100 234

Federal ERNS list

ERNS: The Emergency Response Notification System records and stores information on reported

releases of oil and hazardous substances. The source of this database is the U.S. EPA.

 A review of the ERNS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/31/2009 has revealed that there are 4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TC2800629.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

 ERNS sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 1901 PLAIN AVENUE 1901 PLAIN AVENUE SW 1/2 - 1 (0.522 mi.) B6 9

 625 CRANE AVE 625 CRANE AVE WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.790 mi.) E25 62

 685 MCCLURE RD 685 MCCLURE RD W 1/2 - 1 (0.836 mi.) G36 72

 685 MCCLURE RD EOLA YARD 685 MCCLURE RD EOLA YAR W 1/2 - 1 (0.836 mi.) G38 74

State- and tribal - equivalent NPL

CAT: Illinois Category List.

 A review of the CAT list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1997 has revealed that there is 1 CAT

 site within approximately 2 miles of the target property.

 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 BURLINGTON NORTHERN CHESTNUT / JOHNSON ST W 1/2 - 1 (0.836 mi.) G39 74

Facility Type: SITE REMEDIATION PROGRAM

State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS

SHWS: The State Hazardous Waste Sites records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites

may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state

funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by

potentially responsible parties. The data come from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency’s Category

List.

 A review of the SHWS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2010 has revealed that there is 1 SHWS

 site within approximately 2 miles of the target property.

 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 BURLINGTON NORTHERN - EOLA MCCLURE AVENUE ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.884 mi.) 63 109

State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists

SWF/LF: The Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites records typically contain an inventory of solid

waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. The data come from the Illinois Environmental

Protection Agency’s Available Disposal for Solid Waste in Illinois--Solid Waste Landfills Subject to State

Surcharge list.

 A review of the SWF/LF list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/31/2008 has revealed that there is 1

 SWF/LF site within approximately 1.5 miles of the target property.

 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 HARTMAN, JOHN 235 OAKVIEW SW 1 - 2 (1.198 mi.) 90 170
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TC2800629.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

IL NIPC: NIPC is an inventory of active and inactive solid waste disposal sites, based on state,

local government and historical archive data. Included are numerous sites that previously had never been

identified largely because, prior to 1971, there was no obligation to register such sites. The data come from

the Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission’s Solid Waste Landfill Inventory.

 A review of the IL NIPC list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/01/1988 has revealed that there is 1

 IL NIPC site within approximately 1.5 miles of the target property.

 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 FOX VALLEY PARK DISTRICT #3 SW 1 - 2 (1.328 mi.) 102 238

State and tribal leaking storage tank lists

LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported

leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency’s

LUST Incident Report.

 A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/30/2010 has revealed that there are 31

 LUST sites within approximately 1.5 miles of the target property.

 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 STONEBRIDGE COUNTRY CLUB 2500 STONEBRIDGE BLVD. NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.268 mi.) A1 7

NFA/NFR Letter: 12/9/1999

 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD SW 1/2 - 1 (0.601 mi.) 14 16

NFA/NFR Letter: 3/9/1993

 CAPITAL CONTROL 2115 EAST NEW YORK ST. S 1/2 - 1 (0.869 mi.) H48 87

 GARTNER BUICK 2424 EAST NEW YORK ST. S 1/2 - 1 (0.876 mi.) H54 99

NFA/NFR Letter: 11/9/1993

 NORB KORNAK OLDSMOBILE 2175 NEW YORK ST. S 1/2 - 1 (0.882 mi.) H60 105

NFA/NFR Letter: 6/19/2000

 BURLINGTON NORTHERN - EOLA MCCLURE AVENUE ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.884 mi.) 63 109

NFA/NFR Letter: 1/31/2005

 P.D.I. INDUSTRIES 1666 DEARBORN WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.904 mi.) I65 110

NFA/NFR Letter: 4/14/1993

 CASSENS TRANSPORT CO. 3401 LIBERTY RD. ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.972 mi.) M76 125

NFA/NFR Letter: 8/4/1998

 CASSENS TRANSPORT CO. 3401 LIBERTY AVE. ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.972 mi.) M77 126

NFA/NFR Letter: 8/6/1999

 INDIAN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DIST. #2 5 SOUTH 700 EOLA RD. NNE 1 - 2 (1.170 mi.) 87 169

NFA/NFR Letter: 7/13/1998

 INDIAN PRAIRIE DIST. SCHOOL EOLA RD. NE 1 - 2 (1.174 mi.) 89 169

NFA/NFR Letter: 1/30/2008

 BICKETT’S CAR WASH 1160 NORTH FARNSWORTH AWNW 1 - 2 (1.359 mi.) Q103 238

NFA/NFR Letter: 1/27/1994

 CITGO 420 NORTH FARNSWORTH WSW 1 - 2 (1.365 mi.) 105 240

NFA/NFR Letter: 7/17/2006

 LUNDGREN DOWLING 1180 NORTH FARNSWORTH AWNW 1 - 2 (1.375 mi.) Q106 241

NFA/NFR Letter: 10/26/2006

 CLARK OIL & REFINING 1180 NORTH FARNSWORTH AWNW 1 - 2 (1.375 mi.) Q107 241

NFA/NFR Letter: 8/19/1997
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TC2800629.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8

 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER 1175 NORTH FARNSWORTH AWNW 1 - 2 (1.380 mi.) Q108 242

NFA/NFR Letter: 11/4/1998

 JERRY YUSIM DATSUN 1542 EAST NEW YORK ST. SW 1 - 2 (1.414 mi.) 109 242

NFA/NFR Letter: 1/18/2006

NFA/NFR Letter: 1/18/2006

 WATER PROD. CO. 3255 EAST NEW YORK ST. SE 1 - 2 (1.454 mi.) 111 244

 AGRINETICS 1515 EAST NEW YORK ST. SW 1 - 2 (1.462 mi.) R112 244

NFA/NFR Letter: 12/6/1991

 CARSON, SUSAN 1500 EAST NEW YORK ST. SW 1 - 2 (1.485 mi.) R113 245

NFA/NFR Letter: 1/18/2002

 FOX VALLEY FORD 1401 N FARNSWORTH NW 1 - 2 (1.489 mi.) 114 245

NFA/NFR Letter: 1/6/1997

 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 NATIONAL RENT-A-FENCE 1894 PLAIN AVE. WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.557 mi.) B9 10

 AURORA FAST FREIGHT INC 1859 PLAIN AVE WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.592 mi.) C11 11

 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD 685 MCCLURE RD W 1/2 - 1 (0.836 mi.) G41 77

 RUSS TOGS INC. 1601 EAST MOUNTAIN ST. W 1 - 2 (1.035 mi.) N83 132

 REED MACHINERY & TRANSPORTATIO 712 NORTH FARNSWORTH AVW 1 - 2 (1.215 mi.) O92 172

NFA/NFR Letter: 5/30/2001

 AURORA PAPERBOARD DIV., DAVEY 705 NORTH FARNSWORTH AVW 1 - 2 (1.231 mi.) O94 173

NFA/NFR Letter: 4/4/1991

 SPEEDWAY 7540 948 N FARNSWORTH RD WNW 1 - 2 (1.242 mi.) P97 226

 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA 948 NORTH FARNSWORTH RDWNW 1 - 2 (1.242 mi.) P98 229

 KARD GAS 1302 PLAIN AVE WSW 1 - 2 (1.362 mi.) 104 239

NFA/NFR Letter: 2/11/1999

 CONOCO PHILLIPS 1331 NORTH FARNSWORTH AWNW 1 - 2 (1.452 mi.) 110 243

LUST TRUST: In case sufficient funds are not available in the Underground Storage Tank Fund, requests

for payment are entered on the Payment Priority List by "queue date" order. As required by the Environmental

Protection Act, the queue date is the date that a complete request for partial or final payment was received

by the Agency. The queue date is "officially" confirmed at the end of the payment review process when a Final

Decision Letter is sent to the site owner.

 A review of the LUST TRUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/20/2010 has revealed that there is

 1 LUST TRUST site within approximately 1.5 miles of the target property.

 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 CONOCO PHILLIPS 1331 NORTH FARNSWORTH AWNW 1 - 2 (1.452 mi.) 110 243

State and tribal registered storage tank lists

UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under

Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the Illinois State Fire

Marshal’s STC Facility List.

 A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/03/2010 has revealed that there are 20 UST
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TC2800629.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9

 sites within approximately 1.25 miles of the target property.

 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 JEWEL EXPRESS #3240 1127 NORTH EOLA ROAD E 1/2 - 1 (0.869 mi.) 46 85

 FOX VALLEY CYCLES 2115 E NEW YORK ST S 1/2 - 1 (0.869 mi.) H47 86

 OLD SUPERIOR TOYTA BLDG 2121 E NEW YORK ST S 1/2 - 1 (0.869 mi.) H50 90

 GERTNER BUICK PEUGEOT INC 2424 E NEW YORK ST S 1/2 - 1 (0.876 mi.) H56 100

 VALLEY IMPORTS INC 2170 E NEW YORK ST S 1/2 - 1 (0.882 mi.) H58 102

 NORB KORNAK OLDS, INC. 2175 EAST NEW YORK STRE S 1/2 - 1 (0.882 mi.) H62 108

 HOLLIS ROBERT 1666 DEARBORN ST WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.904 mi.) I66 111

 7-ELEVEN #32202 1202 NORTH EOLA ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.913 mi.) J69 113

 BP AMOCO #14166 1207 NORTH EOLA ROAD ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.933 mi.) K73 123

 R M KAUFMAN 1601 E MOUNTAIN ST W 1/2 - 1 (0.935 mi.) L74 124

 CASSENS TRANSPORT COMPANY 3401 LIBERTY ROAD ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.972 mi.) M78 126

 PREMIER ELECTRICAL CONST CO 1630 E MOUNTAIN ST W 1/2 - 1 (0.975 mi.) L81 129

 STONEBRIDGE COUNTRY CLUB 2705 STONEBRIDGE BLVD N 1 - 2 (1.017 mi.) 82 130

 CIRCLE K #6762 2946 A EAST NEW YORK ST SE 1 - 2 (1.216 mi.) 93 173

 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 NATIONAL RENT A FENCE CO 1894 PLAIN AVE WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.557 mi.) B10 11

 AURORA FAST FREIGHT, INC. 1859 PLAIN AVENUE WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.726 mi.) 21 22

 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RR 685 MCCLURE RD W 1/2 - 1 (0.836 mi.) G37 72

 REED MACHINERY & TRANSPORTATIO 712 N FARNSWORTH W 1 - 2 (1.215 mi.) O91 171

 AURORA PAPERBOARD DIV DAVEY CO 705 N FARNSWORTH AVE W 1 - 2 (1.231 mi.) O96 225

 SPEEDWAY 7540 948 NORTH FARNSWORTH ROWNW 1 - 2 (1.242 mi.) P99 231

State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries

INST CONTROL: Legal or administrative restrictions on land use and/or other activities (e.g.,

groundwater use restrictions) which effectively limit exposure to contamination may be employed as

alternatives to removal or treatment of contamination.

 A review of the INST CONTROL list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/23/2010 has revealed that there

 is 1 INST CONTROL site within approximately 1.5 miles of the target property.

 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 VILLAGE MART ONE HOUR CLEANERS 950 NORTH FARNSWORTH AVWNW 1 - 2 (1.243 mi.) P101 237

State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites

SRP: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Site Remediation Program Database

 A review of the SRP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/23/2010 has revealed that there are 2 SRP

 sites within approximately 1.5 miles of the target property.

 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 GARTNER BUICK 2424 EAST NEW YORK STRE S 1/2 - 1 (0.876 mi.) H52 94

 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 VILLAGE MART ONE HOUR CLEANERS 950 NORTH FARNSWORTH AVWNW 1 - 2 (1.243 mi.) P101 237
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TC2800629.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

Records of Emergency Release Reports

HMIRS: The Hazardous Materials Incident Report System contains hazardous material spill incidents

reported to the Department of Transportation. The source of this database is the U.S. EPA.

 A review of the HMIRS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/06/2010 has revealed that there are 4

 HMIRS sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 Not reported 685 MCCLURE RD W 1/2 - 1 (0.836 mi.) G31 70

 Not reported 685 MCCLURE RD W 1/2 - 1 (0.836 mi.) G32 71

 Not reported 685 MCCLURE ROAD W 1/2 - 1 (0.836 mi.) G33 71

 Not reported 685 MC CLURE RD W 1/2 - 1 (0.836 mi.) G35 72

SPILLS: A listing of incidents reported to the Office of Emergency Response.

 A review of the SPILLS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/19/2010 has revealed that there are 2

 SPILLS sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 Not reported 1901 PLAIN AVE SW 1/2 - 1 (0.522 mi.) B4 8

 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RR 685 MCCLURE RD W 1/2 - 1 (0.836 mi.) G37 72

Other Ascertainable Records

RCRA-NonGen: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting

the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA)

of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or

dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do

not presently generate hazardous waste.

 A review of the RCRA-NonGen list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/17/2010 has revealed that there

 are 9 RCRA-NonGen sites within approximately 1.25 miles of the target property.

 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 BRK FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 733 MCCLURE RD W 1/2 - 1 (0.835 mi.) 29 67

 SUPERIOR TOYOTA AMC JEEP INC 2121 E NEW YORK ST S 1/2 - 1 (0.869 mi.) H49 88

 P C DISPLAY FINISHERS INC 1666 NORTH DEARBORN WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.915 mi.) I70 114

 BP AMOCO 1207 N EOLA RD ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.922 mi.) J72 120

 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 AURORA FAST FREIGHT INC 1859 PLAIN AVE WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.592 mi.) C11 11

 ALLIANCE METAL TREATING 1900 PLAIN AVE. WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.663 mi.) 17 19

 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD 685 MCCLURE ROAD W 1/2 - 1 (0.836 mi.) G40 74

 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD 685 MCCLURE RD W 1/2 - 1 (0.836 mi.) G41 77

 BEST BLAST CORP 1500 DEARBORN ST WSW 1 - 2 (1.141 mi.) 86 135
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TC2800629.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11

TRIS: The Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System identifies facilities that release toxic

chemicals to the air, water, and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III, Section 313. The source

of this database is the U.S. EPA.

 A review of the TRIS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/31/2008 has revealed that there is 1 TRIS

 site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 DUR-O-WAL INC 625 CRANE ST WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.790 mi.) E22 23

FTTS: FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance

activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act) over the

previous five years. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.

 A review of the FTTS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/09/2009 has revealed that there is 1 FTTS

 site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC 625 CRANE AVE. WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.790 mi.) E24 55

HIST FTTS: A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all

ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports

the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances

Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA

regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS

database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is

no longer updated.

 A review of the HIST FTTS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/19/2006 has revealed that there is 1

 HIST FTTS site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC 625 CRANE AVE. WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.790 mi.) E24 55

MLTS: The Material Licensing Tracking System is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission

and contains a list fo approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and are subject to

NRC licensing requirements.

 A review of the MLTS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/18/2010 has revealed that there is 1 MLTS

 site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 PITTWAY CORP. 780 MCCLURE AVENUE W 1/2 - 1 (0.835 mi.) F26 62
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TC2800629.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12

FINDS: The Facility Index System contains both facility information and "pointers" to other

sources of information that contain more detail. These include: RCRIS; Permit Compliance System (PCS);

Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS); FATES (FIFRA [Federal Insecticide Fungicide Rodenticide Act]

and TSCA Enforcement System, FTTS [FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System]; CERCLIS; DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to

manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes); Federal

Underground Injection Control (FURS); Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS); Surface Impoundments (SIA); TSCA

Chemicals in Commerce Information System (CICS); PADS; RCRA-J (medical waste transporters/disposers); TRIS;

and TSCA. The source of this database is the U.S. EPA/NTIS.

 A review of the FINDS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/14/2010 has revealed that there are 31

 FINDS sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 STONEBRIDGE COUNTRY CLUB 2500 STONEBRIDGE BLVD NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.268 mi.) A2 7

 DUKANE PRECAST INC 2000 PLAIN AVENUE SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.408 mi.) 3 7

 NANCY YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 800 ASBURY DR SE 1/2 - 1 (0.628 mi.) 15 18

 AURORA PUMP 2301 LIBERTY S 1/2 - 1 (0.640 mi.) 16 18

 MOSER KENSINGTON JV 2200 E INDIAN TRAIL RD N 1/2 - 1 (0.691 mi.) D19 22

 WYSY/WMRO RADIO 620 EOLA RD ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.694 mi.) 20 22

 WORLD COLOR DIRECT IMAGING 780 MC CLURE RD W 1/2 - 1 (0.835 mi.) F27 62

 FREEDOM IMAGING SYSTEMS INC 780 MCCLURE RD W 1/2 - 1 (0.835 mi.) F28 66

 BRK FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 733 MCCLURE RD W 1/2 - 1 (0.835 mi.) 29 67

 BALLCO MFG INC 2375 E LIBERTY ST ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.838 mi.) 42 78

 GOODWIN, DAN/VEBER POSS RD & 4TH ST ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.851 mi.) 43 84

 CAPITAL CONTROL LTD DBA FOX 2115 E NEW YORK ST S 1/2 - 1 (0.867 mi.) H45 85

 SUPERIOR TOYOTA AMC JEEP INC 2121 E NEW YORK ST S 1/2 - 1 (0.869 mi.) H49 88

 GARTNER COLLISION REVISION 2424 E NEW YORK ST S 1/2 - 1 (0.876 mi.) H53 95

 BILL JACOBS AURORA INC 2170 E NEW YORK ST S 1/2 - 1 (0.882 mi.) H59 103

 NORB KORNAK OLDS INC 2175 E NEW YORK ST S 1/2 - 1 (0.882 mi.) H61 105

 PDI INDUSTRIES INC 1666 DEARBORN AVE WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.904 mi.) I64 110

 FERNANDOS BODY WORKS 1660 DEARBORN AVE WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.909 mi.) I68 113

 P C DISPLAY FINISHERS INC 1666 NORTH DEARBORN WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.915 mi.) I70 114

 BP AMOCO 1207 N EOLA RD ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.922 mi.) J71 119

 CASSENS TRANSPORT CO 3401 LIBERTY ST ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.973 mi.) M80 129

 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 U-PULL-IT 1901 PLAIN AVE SW 1/2 - 1 (0.522 mi.) B5 8

 NATIONAL RENT-A-FENCE 1894 PLAIN AVE WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.557 mi.) B8 10

 AURORA FAST FREIGHT INC 1859 PLAIN AVE WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.592 mi.) C11 11

 MIDSTATES EXPRESS 1859 PLAIN AVE WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.592 mi.) C12 14

 ALLIANCE METAL TREATING 1900 PLAIN AVE. WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.663 mi.) 17 19

 DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC 625 CRANE AVE. WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.790 mi.) E24 55

 CITY AUTO WRECKERS 690 MCCLURE RD W 1/2 - 1 (0.835 mi.) G30 70

 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD 685 MCCLURE ROAD W 1/2 - 1 (0.836 mi.) G40 74

 HEIMANN, MARY THERESE 2315 E NEW YORK ST S 1/2 - 1 (0.853 mi.) 44 85

 PROGRESSIVE TURNING 1680 MOUNTAIN ST W 1/2 - 1 (0.872 mi.) G51 91

DRYCLEANERS: Any business interested in operating a drycleaning facility in Illinois needs to apply for

a license through the Illinois Drycleaner Environmental Response trust Fund.

 A review of the DRYCLEANERS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2010 has revealed that there

 are 3 DRYCLEANERS sites within approximately 1.25 miles of the target property.

 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 STONEBRIDGE CLEANERS 1242 NORTH EOLA ROAD ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.939 mi.) K75 125
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TC2800629.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13

 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 AMERICAN STAR CLEANERS 3150 NORTH AURORA ROAD NE 1 - 2 (1.100 mi.) 85 135

 NEW CLEANERS 2849 EAST NEW YORK STRE SE 1 - 2 (1.172 mi.) 88 169

AIRS: A listing of air permits and emissions information.

 A review of the AIRS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/31/2008 has revealed that there are 7

 AIRS sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 FREEDOM IMAGING SYSTEMS INC 780 MCCLURE RD W 1/2 - 1 (0.835 mi.) F28 66

 BRK FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 733 MCCLURE RD W 1/2 - 1 (0.835 mi.) 29 67

 BALLCO MFG INC 2375 E LIBERTY ST ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.838 mi.) 42 78

 GARTNER COLLISION REVISION 2424 EAST NEW YORK ST. S 1/2 - 1 (0.876 mi.) H55 99

 GARTNER COLLISION REVISION 2424 E NEW YORK S 1/2 - 1 (0.876 mi.) H57 101

 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 DUKANE PRECAST INC 2000 PLAIN AVE SW 1/2 - 1 (0.549 mi.) B7 9

 DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC 625 CRANE AVE WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.790 mi.) E23 23

TIER 2: A listing of facilities which store or manufacture hazardous materials and submit a

chemical inventory report.

 A review of the TIER 2 list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/19/2010 has revealed that there are 3

 TIER 2 sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____

 AURORA PUMP 2301 LIBERTY S 1/2 - 1 (0.640 mi.) 16 18

 EXEL 2303 INDIAN TRAIL ROAD N 1/2 - 1 (0.677 mi.) D18 21

 CASSENS TRANSPORT COMPANY 3401 LIBERTY ST ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.973 mi.) M79 128
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TC2800629.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14

Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped: 

Site Name Database(s) ____________ ____________

BATAVIA TIER 2

DUR-O-WAL, INC. TIER 2

AKZO NOBEL PAINTS LLC TIER 2

RT 25 & E SULLIVAN RD CERC-NFRAP

RT 31 CERC-NFRAP, CORRACTS, RCRA-LQG,

 TRIS, PADS, MANIFEST, MANIFEST

D W CLEANERS DRYCLEANERS

ALL CLEANERS DRYCLEANERS

PRIME CLEANERS DRYCLEANERS

YOUNGS CLEANERS DRYCLEANERS

SCHINDLBECK,JOE P SWF/LF

BFI SWF/LF

SHELL OIL PRODUCTS US LUST

SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LUST

OAKHURST FOREST PRESERVE UST

CITGO UST

MARATHON CITGO STATION UST

8600 WHARF ST CHMIRS, HAZNET

SEARS 1660 RCRA-SQG

1020 NEW YORK ST RCRA-NonGen, FINDS

4006 THRU 4080 FOX VALLEY RCRA-NonGen, FINDS

PENSKE TRUCK LEASING RCRA-CESQG, FINDS

IL & INDIAN TRL FINDS, AIRS

875 RT 25 FINDS, AIRS

RT 25 FINDS, AIRS

RT 31 FINDS, AIRS

2211 S EOLA RD FINDS, AIRS

MCCLURE RD FINDS, AIRS

WISEMAN-HUGHES ENTERPRISES SRP

BRK ELECTRONICS INC AIRS

TELEDYNE PINES AIRS

MIDWEST SOIL REMEDIATION INC AIRS

BRK ELECTRONICS PITTWAY CORP MANIFEST
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.

138 kV 138 kV 138 kV 138 kV

138 kV 138 kV 138 kV 138 kV 138 kV

138 kV 138 kV 138 kV 138 kV 138 kV 138 kV 138 kV

138 kV 138 kV 138 kV 138 kV 138 kV

138 kV 138 kV

138 kV

138 kV

138 kV

138 kV 138 kV
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.

138 kV
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY

Search

Target Distance Total

Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

Federal NPL site list

NPL 2.000 0 0 0 0 0 0

Proposed NPL 2.000 0 0 0 0 0 0

NPL LIENS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0

Federal Delisted NPL site list

Delisted NPL 2.000 0 0 0 0 0 0

Federal CERCLIS list

CERCLIS 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0

FEDERAL FACILITY 2.000 0 0 0 0 0 0

Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List

CERC-NFRAP 1.500 0 0 0 2 0 2

Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list

CORRACTS 2.000 0 0 0 1 0 1

Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list

RCRA-TSDF 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0

Federal RCRA generators list

RCRA-LQG 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0

RCRA-SQG 1.250 0 0 0 4 1 5

RCRA-CESQG 1.250 0 0 0 5 4 9

Federal institutional controls /

engineering controls registries

US ENG CONTROLS 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0

US INST CONTROL 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0

Federal ERNS list

ERNS 1.000 0 0 0 4 NR 4

State- and tribal - equivalent NPL

CAT 2.000 0 0 0 1 0 1

State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS

SHWS 2.000 0 0 0 1 0 1

State and tribal landfill and/or

solid waste disposal site lists

SWF/LF 1.500 0 0 0 0 1 1

LF SPECIAL WASTE 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0

IL NIPC 1.500 0 0 0 0 1 1

State and tribal leaking storage tank lists

LUST 1.500 0 0 1 11 19 31

TC2800629.2s Page 4
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY

Search

Target Distance Total

Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted

LUST TRUST 1.500 0 0 0 0 1 1

INDIAN LUST 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0

State and tribal registered storage tank lists

UST 1.250 0 0 0 15 5 20

INDIAN UST 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0

FEMA UST 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0

State and tribal institutional

control / engineering control registries

ENG CONTROLS 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0

INST CONTROL 1.500 0 0 0 0 1 1

State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites

SRP 1.500 0 0 0 1 1 2

INDIAN VCP 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0

State and tribal Brownfields sites

BROWNFIELDS 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

Local Brownfield lists

US BROWNFIELDS 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0

Local Lists of Landfill / Solid

Waste Disposal Sites

DEBRIS REGION 9 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0

ODI 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0

LF SPECIAL WASTE 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0

INDIAN ODI 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0

Local Lists of Hazardous waste /

Contaminated Sites

US CDL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0

CDL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0

US HIST CDL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0

Local Land Records

LIENS 2 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0

LUCIS 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0

Records of Emergency Release Reports

HMIRS 1.000 0 0 0 4 NR 4

SPILLS 1.000 0 0 0 2 NR 2

Other Ascertainable Records

RCRA-NonGen 1.250 0 0 0 8 1 9

DOT OPS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0

DOD 2.000 0 0 0 0 0 0

TC2800629.2s Page 5
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY

Search

Target Distance Total

Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted

FUDS 2.000 0 0 0 0 0 0

CONSENT 2.000 0 0 0 0 0 0

ROD 2.000 0 0 0 0 0 0

UMTRA 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0

MINES 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0

TRIS 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR 1

TSCA 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0

FTTS 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR 1

HIST FTTS 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR 1

SSTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0

ICIS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0

PADS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0

MLTS 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR 1

RADINFO 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0

FINDS 1.000 0 0 2 29 NR 31

RAATS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0

UIC 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0

NPDES 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0

DRYCLEANERS 1.250 0 0 0 1 2 3

IMPDMENT 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0

AIRS 1.000 0 0 0 7 NR 7

TIER 2 1.000 0 0 0 3 NR 3

INDIAN RESERV 2.000 0 0 0 0 0 0

SCRD DRYCLEANERS 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0

PCB TRANSFORMER 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0

COAL ASH EPA 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0

COAL ASH DOE 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0

EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS

EDR Proprietary Records

Manufactured Gas Plants 2.000 0 0 0 0 0 0

EDR Historical Auto Stations 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0

EDR Historical Cleaners 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0

NOTES:

 TP = Target Property

 NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance

 Sites may be listed in more than one database

TC2800629.2s Page 6
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

NFR Date Recorded: 2/14/2000

NFA/NFR Letter: 12/9/1999

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 4/5/1999

20 Report Received: 4/5/1999

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 732

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: 6308986139

PRP City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60504

PRP Address: 2705 Stonebridge Blvd.

PRP Contact: Parin Schmidt

PRP Name: Stonebridge Country Club

Email: Not reported

Project Manager Phone: (217) 782-6762

Project Manager: Campbell

IEMA Date: 1/22/1999

Product: Gasoline, Deisel

IL EPA Id: 0894075796

Incident Num: 990137

LUST:

1412 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster A

0.268 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

719 ft.

1/4-1/2 AURORA, IL 60504

NNE 2500 STONEBRIDGE BLVD. N/A

A1 STONEBRIDGE COUNTRY CLUB LUST S103690705

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110018171538

FINDS:

1412 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster A

0.268 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

719 ft.

1/4-1/2 AURORA, IL 60504

NNE 2500 STONEBRIDGE BLVD N/A

A2 STONEBRIDGE COUNTRY CLUB FINDS 1008120527

Aerometric Data (SAROAD). AIRS is the national repository for

National Emission Data System (NEDS), and the Storage and Retrieval of

Subsystem) replaces the former Compliance Data System (CDS), the

AFS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Facility

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110001339784

FINDS:

2154 ft.

0.408 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

712 ft.

1/4-1/2 AURORA, IL 60505

SW 2000 PLAIN AVENUE N/A

3 DUKANE PRECAST INC FINDS 1004475688

TC2800629.2s Page 7
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES facilities.

Elimination System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the

information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge

PCS (Permit Compliance System) is a computerized management

discharge does not adversely affect water quality.

requirements, and include other provisions to ensure that the

limits on what can be discharged, impose monitoring and reporting

States are required to obtain a permit. The permit will likely contain

discharge pollutants from any point source into waters of the United

issued under the Clean Water Act. Under NPDES, all facilities that

the Compliance Information System (ICIS) tracks surface water permits

US National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) module of

their precursors, as well as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs).

on stationary and mobile sources that emit criteria air pollutants and

The NEI (National Emissions Inventory) database contains information

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

of the Clean Air Act.

redesign to support facility operating permits required under Title V

estimation of total national emissions. AFS is undergoing a major

to comply with regulatory programs and by EPA as an input for the

AFS data are utilized by states to prepare State Implementation Plans

used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants.

information concerning airborne pollution in the United States. AFS is

DUKANE PRECAST INC (Continued) 1004475688

PRP Name: U-PULL IT AUTO PARTS

Facility City: AURORA

Facility Address: 1901 PLAIN AVE

Incident ID: 20090663

SPILLS:

2758 ft. Site 1 of 7 in cluster B

0.522 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

703 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 

SW 1901 PLAIN AVE N/A

B4 SPILLS S109699896

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110018196496

FINDS:

2758 ft. Site 2 of 7 in cluster B

0.522 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

703 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

SW 1901 PLAIN AVE N/A

B5 U-PULL-IT FINDS 1008123009

TC2800629.2s Page 8
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

additional ERNS detail in the EDR Site Report.

Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access 

2758 ft. Site 3 of 7 in cluster B

0.522 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

703 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 

SW 1901 PLAIN AVENUE N/A

B6 1901 PLAIN AVENUE ERNS 2009909139

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Not reported

Year: Not reported

Emissions:

Year: 2007

Address Type Code: Not reported

SIC Code: 3273

Cease Operation Date: Not reported

ID Number: 089407AAM

Lat/Long: Not reported

Contact Fax: Not reported

Contact EMail: Not reported

Contact Extention: Not reported

Contact Tele: 630-898-6311

Contact Title: Not reported

Contact Name: Tom Gorman

Facility Address 2: Not reported

Facility ID: 16115

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: Not reported

Pollutant Code: Not reported

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Not reported

Year: Not reported

Emissions:

Year: 2006

Address Type Code: LOC

SIC Code: 3273

Cease Operation Date: Not reported

ID Number: 089407AAM

Lat/Long: 41.768000 / -88.266000

Contact Fax: 630-355-0441

Contact EMail: tgorman@dukaneprecast.com

Contact Extention: Not reported

Contact Tele: 630-898-6311

Contact Title: Not reported

Contact Name: Tom Gorman

Facility Address 2: Not reported

Facility ID: 16115

IL AIRS:

2896 ft. Site 4 of 7 in cluster B

0.549 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

702 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

SW 2000 PLAIN AVE N/A

B7 DUKANE PRECAST INC AIRS S107741532

TC2800629.2s Page 9
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: Not reported

Pollutant Code: Not reported

DUKANE PRECAST INC (Continued) S107741532

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110018197235

FINDS:

2943 ft. Site 5 of 7 in cluster B

0.557 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

702 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

WSW 1894 PLAIN AVE N/A

B8 NATIONAL RENT-A-FENCE FINDS 1008123083

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 9/23/1994

20 Report Received: 9/23/1994

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 732

Site Classification: LOW

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Dallas, TX 75212

PRP Address: 6303 Zenith

PRP Contact: Dennis McFarlind

PRP Name: National Rent-A-Fence

Email: Steve.Putrich@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 524-4827

Project Manager: Putrich

IEMA Date: 6/8/1994

Product: Gasoline

IL EPA Id: 0894075905

Incident Num: 941271

LUST:

2943 ft. Site 6 of 7 in cluster B

0.557 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

702 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

WSW 1894 PLAIN AVE. N/A

B9 NATIONAL RENT-A-FENCE LUST S104523155

TC2800629.2s Page 10
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: 1/1/1902

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 5/5/1994

Last Used Date: 6/8/1994

Tank Substance: Diesel Fuel

Tank Capacity: 500

Tank Number: 2

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: 1/1/1902

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 5/5/1994

Last Used Date: 6/8/1994

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 10000

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Pacoima, CA 91331

Owner Address: 10403 Glenoaks Blvd

Owner Id: U0022905

Owner Name: M&M Properties

Facility Type: Industrial / Manufacturing

Facility Status: Closed

Facility ID: 2033117

UST:

2943 ft. Site 7 of 7 in cluster B

0.557 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

702 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60506

WSW 1894 PLAIN AVE N/A

B10 NATIONAL RENT A FENCE CO UST U001965304

Contact address: 1859 PLAIN AVE

Contact: KENNETH HARTMANN

EPA ID: ILD004789400

 AURORA, IL 60505

Facility address: 1859 PLAIN AVE

Facility name: AURORA FAST FREIGHT INC

Date form received by agency: 07/30/2009

RCRA-NonGen:

3126 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster C

0.592 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

700 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505 LUST

WSW 1859 PLAIN AVE FINDS ILD004789400

C11 AURORA FAST FREIGHT INC RCRA-NonGen 1000340792

TC2800629.2s Page 11
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Generated waste on-site: Not reported

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Lamps

Generated waste on-site: Not reported

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Batteries

Universal Waste Summary:

Off-site waste receiver: Verified to be non-commercial

Used oil transporter: Unknown

Used oil transfer facility: Unknown

Used oil Specification marketer: Unknown

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: Unknown

User oil refiner: Unknown

Used oil processor: Unknown

Used oil fuel burner: Unknown

Furnace exemption: Unknown

On-site burner exemption: Unknown

Underground injection activity: Unknown

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: Unknown

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: Unknown

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Unknown

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: Unknown

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: NAME NOT REPORTED

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: NAME NOT REPORTED

Owner/Operator Summary:

Description: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste

Classification: Non-Generator

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (312) 898-4414

Contact country: US

 AURORA, IL 60505

AURORA FAST FREIGHT INC (Continued) 1000340792

TC2800629.2s Page 12
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

 SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES.

 F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND

 OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE LISTED IN F001, F004, OR

 BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE

 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING,

 ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND

 CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE,

 METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE,

Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,

Waste code: F002

 SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES.

 IN F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE

 ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED

 CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF

 FLUOROCARBONS; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS USED IN DEGREASING

 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, CARBON TETRACHLORIDE, AND CHLORINATED

 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE,

Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS USED IN DEGREASING:

Waste code: F001

 DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE.

 THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE

 USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN

 OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS

 CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN

 CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A

Waste name: A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS

Waste code: D002

 WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE.

 MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT

 WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE

 FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET,

 CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE

 LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS

Waste name: IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF

Waste code: D001

Waste name: Not Defined

Waste code: D000

Hazardous Waste Summary:

Classification: Not a generator, verified

Facility name: AURORA FAST FREIGHT INC

Date form received by agency: 04/07/1982

Historical Generators:

Generated waste on-site: Not reported

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Thermostats

Generated waste on-site: Not reported

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Pesticides

AURORA FAST FREIGHT INC (Continued) 1000340792

TC2800629.2s Page 13
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 11/2/1998

20 Report Received: 8/25/1998

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 732

Site Classification: HIGH

PRP Phone: 6309060250

PRP City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60506

PRP Address: 1859 Plain Ave.

PRP Contact: Bruce Hartman

PRP Name: Aurora Fast Freight

Email: Karl.Kaiser@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 524-4650

Project Manager: Kaiser

IEMA Date: 7/29/1998

Product: Deisel

IL EPA Id: 0894075071

Incident Num: 981859

LUST:

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110005812059

FINDS:

Violation Status: No violations found

 SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES.

 F001, F002, AND F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE

 OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN

 BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE

 ACID, AND NITROBENZENE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING,

Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: CRESOLS AND CRESYLIC

Waste code: F004

AURORA FAST FREIGHT INC (Continued) 1000340792

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110017873050

FINDS:

3126 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster C

0.592 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

700 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

WSW 1859 PLAIN AVE N/A

C12 MIDSTATES EXPRESS FINDS 1007450976

TC2800629.2s Page 14
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

MIDSTATES EXPRESS (Continued) 1007450976

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 05/15/2002

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: Not reported

Owner/operator country: US

 AURORA, IL 60505

Owner/operator address: 1859 PLAIN AVE

Owner/operator name: MIDSTATES EXPRESS

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 05/15/2002

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: Not reported

Owner/operator country: US

 AURORA, IL 60505

Owner/operator address: 1859 PLAIN AVE

Owner/operator name: MIDSTATES EXPRESS

Owner/Operator Summary:

 hazardous waste at any time

 waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of

 hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous

 waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of

Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous

Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (219) 873-0666

Contact country: Not reported

 AURORA, IL 60505

Contact address: 1859 PLAIN AVE

Contact: HAROLD J FERENCZI

EPA ID: ILR000128678

 AURORA, IL 60505

Facility address: 1859 PLAIN AVE

Facility name: MIDSTATES EXPRESS

Date form received by agency: 06/09/2004

RCRA-SQG:

3126 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster C

0.592 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

700 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

WSW 1859 PLAIN AVE ILR000128678

C13 MIDSTATES EXPRESS RCRA-SQG 1007370584

TC2800629.2s Page 15
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Violation Status: No violations found

 DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE.

 THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE

 USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN

 OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS

 CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN

 CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A

Waste name: A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS

Waste code: D002

Hazardous Waste Summary:

Off-site waste receiver: Commercial status unknown

Used oil transporter: No

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

Used oil processor: No

Used oil fuel burner: No

Furnace exemption: No

On-site burner exemption: No

Underground injection activity: No

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No

MIDSTATES EXPRESS (Continued) 1007370584

Area: 0.00000000000

SIA:

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: 3/9/1993

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 9/3/1992

20 Report Received: 7/16/1992

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 731

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Cicero, IL 60650

PRP Address: 5601 West 26th St.

PRP Contact: Joe Fleagle

PRP Name: Burlington Northern Railroad

Email: Not reported

Project Manager Phone: Not reported

Project Manager: Irwin

IEMA Date: 6/16/1992

Product: Gasoline

IL EPA Id: 0730055003

Incident Num: 921638

LUST:

3175 ft.

0.601 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

711 ft.

1/2-1 , IL 

SW IMPDMENT N/A

14 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD LUST S105250537

TC2800629.2s Page 16
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

SIC Code 2: 1211

Dun and Bradst # Identifying Operator Business 2: Not reported

Dun and Bradst # Identifying Facility Type 2: Not reported

Dun and Bradst # Identifying Operator Business 2: Not reported

Dun and Bradst # Identifying Facility Type 2: Not reported

Site Features: RU

Seepage Affected Drnk Water Wells Within 1 Mile: UNKNOWN

GW Quality Changes Detected: Not reported

Explanation Of GW Sampling if Other: Not reported

Frequency Of Groundwater Samplings: Not reported

Number of Monitoring Wells: 00

If Agricultural Impoundment, Average Daily # Livestock: 000000

If Agricultural Impoundment, Type of Livestock: Not reported

Description of Liner Type If ?? Above: Not reported

If Liner Type ?? Above, Thickness (inches): 000

Bottom of Liner: NONE

Year of Record for above Average: 1974

Avg Effluent for all Impoundments at facility: 000007200

Year of record for above average: 1971

Year of record for above average: 000024000

Year of record for above (effluent) average: 0000

Average Effluent (gal/day) out of impoundment: 000000000

Year of Record for above (influent) average: 0000

Average Influent (Gal/day) Into Impoundment: 000000000

Surface Area of all impoundments (acres): 0000014

Surface Area of all impoundments (acres): 000007

Last Year of Operation if Not in Use: 0000

Unique Record # assigned by S. Schock: P4558

# of years in Operation if In Use: 14

Impoundment Currently In Use: Yes

Age of Impoundment in Years: 14

Explanation For Above: STABILIZATN

Purpose For Impoundment: TREATMENT

Unique impoundment Number: 002

SIA Number: 00087

Type of Impoundment Facility 2: MINING

Place Code: 38882

County FIPS Code: 089

State Abbreviation: IL

Operator City,St,Zip: 0

Operator address: Not reported

Operator of impoundment: Not reported

Land Owner City,St,Zip: CHICAGO, IL 60606

Land owner street address: 547 WEST JACKSON BLVD

Date Facility Id’d and Inventoried: 41879

Longitude: 0881600

Latitude: 414600

SIC Code 2: 1211

NPDES Permit #: IL0037656

IEPA ID: 0

# of impoundments at Site: 002

SIA Number: 00087

Type of Impoundment Facility: MINING

Place Code: 38882

County FIPS Code: 089

Perimeter: 0.00000000000

BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD (Continued) S105250537

TC2800629.2s Page 17
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

sciences.

United States and other nations and the institute of education

entity for collecting and analyzing data related to education in the

NCES (National Center for Education Statistics) is the primary federal

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110036921418

FINDS:

3315 ft.

0.628 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

729 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60502

SE 800 ASBURY DR N/A

15 NANCY YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FINDS 1008256292

Max Daily Range: 100 - 999

CAS Number: 7664939

Chemical Name: SULFURIC ACID

Longitude: -88.262310835999898

Latitude: 41.764519483000001

Corporate Name: Verizon Wireless

Year: 2008

Max Daily Range: 100 - 999

CAS Number: 7664939

Chemical Name: SULFURIC ACID

Longitude: -88.262310835999898

Latitude: 41.764519483000001

Corporate Name: Verizon Wireless

TIER 2:

Incident Tracking, Compliance Assistance, and Compliance Monitoring.

that support Compliance and Enforcement programs. These include;

has the capability to track other activities occurring in the Region

that information with Federal actions already in the system. ICIS also

Compliance System (PCS) which supports the NPDES and will integrate

it Headquarters. A future release of ICIS will replace the Permit

information is maintained in ICIS by EPA in the Regional offices and

Federal Administrative and Judicial enforcement actions. This

a single repository for that information. Currently, ICIS contains all

replace EPA’s independent databases that contain Enforcement data with

information across most of EPA’s programs. The vision for ICIS is to

complete, will contain integrated Enforcement and Compliance

Compliance Information System and provides a database that, when

ICIS (Integrated Compliance Information System) is the Integrated

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110028076196

FINDS:

3379 ft.

0.640 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

718 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

South 2301 LIBERTY TIER 2 N/A

16 AURORA PUMP FINDS 1010038632

TC2800629.2s Page 18
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Year: 2009

AURORA PUMP (Continued) 1010038632

Furnace exemption: Unknown

On-site burner exemption: Unknown

Underground injection activity: No

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Unknown

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: Unknown

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: NAME NOT REPORTED

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: CATCHPOLE DONALD

Owner/Operator Summary:

Description: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste

Classification: Non-Generator

Land type: Facility is not located on Indian land. Additional information is not known.

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: Not reported

Contact country: Not reported

 Not reported

Contact address: Not reported

Contact: Not reported

 EOLA, IL 60519

Mailing address: P O BOX 68

EPA ID: ILD067995621

 AURORA, IL 60505

Facility address: 1900 PLAIN AVE

Facility name: ALLIANCE METAL TREATING INC

Date form received by agency: 04/20/1998

RCRA-NonGen:

3499 ft.

0.663 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

703 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

WSW 1900 PLAIN AVE. FINDS ILD067995621

17 ALLIANCE METAL TREATING RCRA-NonGen 1000182949

TC2800629.2s Page 19
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

of the Clean Air Act.

redesign to support facility operating permits required under Title V

estimation of total national emissions. AFS is undergoing a major

to comply with regulatory programs and by EPA as an input for the

AFS data are utilized by states to prepare State Implementation Plans

used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants.

information concerning airborne pollution in the United States. AFS is

Aerometric Data (SAROAD). AIRS is the national repository for

National Emission Data System (NEDS), and the Storage and Retrieval of

Subsystem) replaces the former Compliance Data System (CDS), the

AFS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Facility

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110001382156

FINDS:

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Area of violation: Not reported

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE VISIT

Evaluation date: 01/13/1998

Evaluation Action Summary:

Violation Status: No violations found

 SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES.

 IN F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE

 ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED

 CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF

 FLUOROCARBONS; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS USED IN DEGREASING

 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, CARBON TETRACHLORIDE, AND CHLORINATED

 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE,

Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS USED IN DEGREASING:

Waste code: F001

Waste name: Not Defined

Waste code: D000

Hazardous Waste Summary:

Classification: Small Quantity Generator

Facility name: ALLIANCE METAL TREATING INC

Date form received by agency: 07/09/1987

Historical Generators:

Off-site waste receiver: Verified to be non-commercial

Used oil transporter: No

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

Used oil processor: No

Used oil fuel burner: No

ALLIANCE METAL TREATING (Continued) 1000182949

TC2800629.2s Page 20
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Incident Tracking, Compliance Assistance, and Compliance Monitoring.

that support Compliance and Enforcement programs. These include;

has the capability to track other activities occurring in the Region

that information with Federal actions already in the system. ICIS also

Compliance System (PCS) which supports the NPDES and will integrate

it Headquarters. A future release of ICIS will replace the Permit

information is maintained in ICIS by EPA in the Regional offices and

Federal Administrative and Judicial enforcement actions. This

a single repository for that information. Currently, ICIS contains all

replace EPA’s independent databases that contain Enforcement data with

information across most of EPA’s programs. The vision for ICIS is to

complete, will contain integrated Enforcement and Compliance

Compliance Information System and provides a database that, when

ICIS (Integrated Compliance Information System) is the Integrated

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

transported off-site.

these facilities release directly to air, water, land, or that are

from facilities on the amounts of over 300 listed toxic chemicals that

US EPA TRIS (Toxics Release Inventory System) contains information

their precursors, as well as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs).

on stationary and mobile sources that emit criteria air pollutants and

The NEI (National Emissions Inventory) database contains information

ALLIANCE METAL TREATING (Continued) 1000182949

Year: 2009

Max Daily Range: 10,000 - 99,999

CAS Number: 7664417

Chemical Name: ANHYDROUS AMMONIA

Longitude: -88.372020000000006

Latitude: 41.780949999999898

Corporate Name: Exel

Year: 2008

Max Daily Range: 10,000 - 99,999

CAS Number: 7664417

Chemical Name: ANHYDROUS AMMONIA

Longitude: -88.372020000000006

Latitude: 41.780949999999898

Corporate Name: Exel

TIER 2:

3572 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster D

0.677 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

732 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60506

North 2303 INDIAN TRAIL ROAD N/A

D18 EXEL TIER 2 S110152460

TC2800629.2s Page 21
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110018304217

FINDS:

3646 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster D

0.691 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

734 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

North 2200 E INDIAN TRAIL RD N/A

D19 MOSER KENSINGTON JV FINDS 1008133740

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110018198109

FINDS:

3664 ft.

0.694 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

716 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60507

ESE 620 EOLA RD N/A

20 WYSY/WMRO RADIO FINDS 1008123170

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 2/28/1986

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Diesel Fuel

Tank Capacity: 10000

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60505

Owner Address: 1859 Plain Ave.

Owner Id: U0000967

Owner Name: Aurora Fast Freight, Inc.

Facility Type: None

Facility Status: Closed

Facility ID: 2001478

UST:

3831 ft.

0.726 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

706 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

WSW 1859 PLAIN AVENUE N/A

21 AURORA FAST FREIGHT, INC. UST U002113026

TC2800629.2s Page 22
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Not Installed

OSFM First Notify Date: Not reported

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Diesel Fuel

Tank Capacity: 20000

Tank Number: 3

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 2/28/1986

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Diesel Fuel

Tank Capacity: 10000

Tank Number: 2

Fee Due: No

AURORA FAST FREIGHT, INC. (Continued) U002113026

4170 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster E

0.790 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

708 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

WSW 625 CRANE ST 60505DRWLN62

E22 DUR-O-WAL INC TRIS 1005450237

Contact EMail: mikesmith@daytonsuperior.com

Contact Extention: 345

Contact Tele: 630-898-1101

Contact Title: Not reported

Contact Name: Michael Smith

Facility Address 2: Not reported

Facility ID: 5822

IL AIRS:

4170 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster E

0.790 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

708 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

WSW 625 CRANE AVE N/A

E23 DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC AIRS S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 23
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: .040000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: .630000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: .617300

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.330000

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.330000

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: .000000

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Emissions:

Year: 2006

Address Type Code: LOC

SIC Code: 3499

Cease Operation Date: Not reported

ID Number: 089005AGU

Lat/Long: 41.767450 / -88.270800

Contact Fax: 630-898-8331

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 24
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.09

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.159

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.01

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 3.63896

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 5

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.73320

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: .750000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 25
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 3.63896

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.73320

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 5

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.7287

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.41

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.68

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.59

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 26
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 3.63896

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 05/18/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 3

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 05/18/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.24000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 05/18/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 05/18/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 05/18/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2.47000

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 05/18/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2.47000

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 27
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/02/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 3.93000

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/02/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.55000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/02/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/02/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 05/18/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.73320

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 5

Pollutant Code: PART

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 28
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Tons per Year: 0.73320

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 3.63896

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 5

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 3.63896

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.73320

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/02/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.30000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/02/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/02/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 29
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.42100

Pollutant Code: ZNC

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PBB

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.52600

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: LEAD

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.38100

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 30
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated Date: 07/13/00

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 5

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 07/13/00

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 3.63896

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 07/13/00

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.73320

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 5

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 4.60000

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.66000

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.66000

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/02/03

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 31
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 05/14/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.46800

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 05/14/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 05/14/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2.26460

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 05/14/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.72960

Pollutant Code: ZNC

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 05/14/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.11000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 05/14/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2.26460

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 05/14/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 4.74700

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 32
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2.21230

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 3.62260

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/14/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.22900

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 33
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.28883

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 01/31/00

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2.82000

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 01/31/00

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.46800

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 07/13/00

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 5

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 07/13/00

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 3.63896

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 07/13/00

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.73320

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2.21230

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 34
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.22880

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.28880

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: 05/28/99

Last Updated By: EPA2478

Tons per Year: 0.12250

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.28880

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.22880

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: 05/28/99

Last Updated By: EPA2478

Tons per Year: 0.45150

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.22880

Pollutant Code: NOX

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 35
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.16900

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.22880

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.28880

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.22880

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.28880

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 36
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 3.27600

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.28610

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.14450

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 13.10400

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 37
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 3.27600

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.95260

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 13.10400

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 3.27600

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.25090

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 38
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: .000000

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Emissions:

Year: 2007

Address Type Code: Not reported

SIC Code: 3499

Cease Operation Date: Not reported

ID Number: 089005AGU

Lat/Long: Not reported

Contact Fax: Not reported

Contact EMail: Not reported

Contact Extention: Not reported

Contact Tele: 630-898-1101

Contact Title: Not reported

Contact Name: Michael Dexter

Facility Address 2: Not reported

Facility ID: 5822

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.23810

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 13.10400

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1992

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 39
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.73320

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: .750000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: .040000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: .630000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: .617300

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.330000

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.330000

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 40
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.68

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.59

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.09

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.159

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.01

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 3.63896

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 5

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 41
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 05/18/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2.47000

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 05/18/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2.47000

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 3.63896

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.73320

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 5

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.7287

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.41

Pollutant Code: CO

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 42
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.73320

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 5

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 3.63896

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 05/18/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 3

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 05/18/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.24000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 05/18/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 05/18/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 43
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.30000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/02/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/02/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/02/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 3.93000

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/02/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.55000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/02/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/02/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 05/18/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 44
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated Date: 05/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.73320

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 3.63896

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 5

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 3.63896

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.73320

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/02/04

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 45
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.66000

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.66000

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.42100

Pollutant Code: ZNC

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PBB

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.52600

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: LEAD

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.38100

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 46
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 05/14/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2.26460

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 05/14/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 4.74700

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 07/13/00

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 5

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 07/13/00

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 3.63896

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 07/13/00

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.73320

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 05/29/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 5

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 05/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 4.60000

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 47
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 3.62260

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/14/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.22900

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 05/14/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.46800

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 05/14/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 05/14/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2.26460

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 05/14/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.72960

Pollutant Code: ZNC

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 05/14/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.11000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 48
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Pollutant Code: HCL

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 07/13/00

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.73320

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2.21230

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2.21230

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: CO

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 49
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Tons per Year: 0.22880

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: 05/28/99

Last Updated By: EPA2478

Tons per Year: 0.45150

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.22880

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.28883

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 01/31/00

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2.82000

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 01/31/00

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.46800

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 07/13/00

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 5

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 07/13/00

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 3.63896

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 50
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.22880

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.28880

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.22880

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.28880

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: 05/28/99

Last Updated By: EPA2478

Tons per Year: 0.12250

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.28880

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 51
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 13.10400

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.16900

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.22880

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.28880

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 52
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.25090

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 3.27600

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.28610

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.14450

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1994

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 53
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 3.27600

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.95260

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 13.10400

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 3.27600

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

TC2800629.2s Page 54
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.23810

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 13.10400

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) S107741549

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: DUR O WAL

Owner/Operator Summary:

 hazardous waste

 the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely

 any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from

 time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of

 hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any

 from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely

 of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting

 land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less

 other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any

 waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or

 month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous

 or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar

 month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time;

Description: Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendar

Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator

Land type: Private

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (630) 898-1101

Contact country: Not reported

 Not reported

Contact address: Not reported

Contact: MICHAEL DEXTER

EPA ID: ILD039617543

 AURORA, IL 60505

Facility address: 625 CRANE ST

Facility name: DUR-O-WAL INC

Date form received by agency: 10/14/2009

RCRA-CESQG:

4170 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster E

0.790 mi. FINDS

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

708 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505 HIST FTTS

WSW 625 CRANE AVE. FTTS ILD039617543

E24 DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC RCRA-CESQG 1000139448

TC2800629.2s Page 55
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: Unknown

User oil refiner: Unknown

Used oil processor: Unknown

Used oil fuel burner: Unknown

Furnace exemption: Unknown

On-site burner exemption: Unknown

Underground injection activity: Unknown

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: Unknown

Transporter of hazardous waste: Unknown

Recycler of hazardous waste: Unknown

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Unknown

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: Unknown

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 06/15/1980

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: Not reported

Owner/operator country: US

 AURORA, IL 60505

Owner/operator address: 625 CRANE

Owner/operator name: DUR-O-WAL INC

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 02/10/1964

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: Not reported

Owner/operator country: US

 AURORA, IL 60505

Owner/operator address: 625 CRANE

Owner/operator name: DUROWAL INC

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 06/15/1980

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: Not reported

Owner/operator country: US

 DAYTON, OH 45459

Owner/operator address: 777 WASHINGTON VILLAGE DR

Owner/operator name: DAYTON SUPERIOR

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: NAME NOT REPORTED

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) 1000139448

TC2800629.2s Page 56
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Classification: Large Quantity Generator

Site name: DUR O WAL INC

Facility name: DUR-O-WAL INC

Date form received by agency: 03/03/2003

Classification: Large Quantity Generator

Facility name: DUR-O-WAL INC

Date form received by agency: 03/01/2004

Classification: Large Quantity Generator

Facility name: DUR-O-WAL INC

Date form received by agency: 03/01/2006

Classification: Large Quantity Generator

Facility name: DUR-O-WAL INC

Date form received by agency: 03/01/2008

Historical Generators:

Generated waste on-site: Unknown

Accumulated waste on-site: Unknown

Waste type: Thermostats

Generated waste on-site: Unknown

Accumulated waste on-site: Unknown

Waste type: Pesticides

Generated waste on-site: Unknown

Accumulated waste on-site: Unknown

Waste type: Lamps

Generated waste on-site: Unknown

Accumulated waste on-site: Unknown

Waste type: Batteries

Generated waste on-site: Not reported

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Thermostats

Generated waste on-site: Not reported

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Pesticides

Generated waste on-site: Not reported

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Lamps

Generated waste on-site: Not reported

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Batteries

Universal Waste Summary:

Off-site waste receiver: Commercial status unknown

Used oil transporter: Unknown

Used oil transfer facility: Unknown

Used oil Specification marketer: Unknown

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) 1000139448

TC2800629.2s Page 57
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Amount (Lbs): 52393.8

 DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE.

 THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE

 USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN

 OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS

 CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN

 CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A

Waste name: A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS

Waste code: D002

Annual Waste Handled:

Last Biennial Reporting Year: 2009

Biennial Reports:

Waste name: ARSENIC

Waste code: D004

Waste name: Not Defined

Waste code: D000

Waste name: LEAD

Waste code: D008

Waste name: CHROMIUM

Waste code: D007

Waste name: CADMIUM

Waste code: D006

 DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE.

 THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE

 USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN

 OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS

 CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN

 CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A

Waste name: A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS

Waste code: D002

 WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE.

 MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT

 WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE

 FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET,

 CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE

 LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS

Waste name: IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF

Waste code: D001

Hazardous Waste Summary:

Classification: Large Quantity Generator

Site name: DUR O WAL INC

Facility name: DUR-O-WAL INC

Date form received by agency: 08/05/1987

Classification: Large Quantity Generator

Facility name: DUR-O-WAL INC

Date form received by agency: 03/01/2002

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) 1000139448

TC2800629.2s Page 58
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Violation lead agency: EPA

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Date violation determined: 12/15/2004

Area of violation: Generators - General

Regulation violated: SR - 725.151(e)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: Not reported

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: Not reported

 Enforcement action: Not reported

Violation lead agency: EPA

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Date violation determined: 12/15/2004

Area of violation: Generators - General

Regulation violated: SR - 722.142(a)(2)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: Not reported

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: Not reported

 Enforcement action: Not reported

Violation lead agency: EPA

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Date violation determined: 12/15/2004

Area of violation: Generators - General

Regulation violated: SR - 703.121(a)&(b)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: Not reported

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: Not reported

 Enforcement action: Not reported

Violation lead agency: EPA

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Date violation determined: 12/15/2004

Area of violation: Generators - General

Regulation violated: SR - 722.123(a)

Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:

Amount (Lbs): 1595.1

Waste name: LEAD

Waste code: D008

Amount (Lbs): 1595.1

Waste name: CHROMIUM

Waste code: D007

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) 1000139448

TC2800629.2s Page 59
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Legislation Code: EPCRA

Investigation Reason: Neutral Scheme, Region

Investigation Type: EPCRA, Enforcement, Federal Conducted

Violation occurred: Yes

Inspector: ALLEN

Inspection Date: Not reported

Region: 05

Inspection Number: 2003071820817 1

HIST FTTS INSP:

Facility Function: Manufacturer

Legislation Code: EPCRA

Investigation Reason: Neutral Scheme, Region

Investigation Type: EPCRA, Enforcement, Federal Conducted

Violation occurred: Yes

Inspector: ALLEN

Inspection Date: 07/18/03

Region: 05

Inspection Number: 2003071820817 1

FTTS INSP:

Evaluation lead agency: EPA

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Area of violation: Generators - General

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 12/15/2004

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Area of violation: Not reported

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 10/14/2009

Evaluation Action Summary:

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: Not reported

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: Not reported

 Enforcement action: Not reported

Violation lead agency: EPA

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Date violation determined: 12/15/2004

Area of violation: Generators - General

Regulation violated: SR - 725.116

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: Not reported

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: Not reported

 Enforcement action: Not reported

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) 1000139448

TC2800629.2s Page 60
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES facilities.

Elimination System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the

information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge

PCS (Permit Compliance System) is a computerized management

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

discharge does not adversely affect water quality.

requirements, and include other provisions to ensure that the

limits on what can be discharged, impose monitoring and reporting

States are required to obtain a permit. The permit will likely contain

discharge pollutants from any point source into waters of the United

issued under the Clean Water Act. Under NPDES, all facilities that

the Compliance Information System (ICIS) tracks surface water permits

US National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) module of

transported off-site.

these facilities release directly to air, water, land, or that are

from facilities on the amounts of over 300 listed toxic chemicals that

US EPA TRIS (Toxics Release Inventory System) contains information

their precursors, as well as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs).

on stationary and mobile sources that emit criteria air pollutants and

The NEI (National Emissions Inventory) database contains information

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

of the Clean Air Act.

redesign to support facility operating permits required under Title V

estimation of total national emissions. AFS is undergoing a major

to comply with regulatory programs and by EPA as an input for the

AFS data are utilized by states to prepare State Implementation Plans

used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants.

information concerning airborne pollution in the United States. AFS is

Aerometric Data (SAROAD). AIRS is the national repository for

National Emission Data System (NEDS), and the Storage and Retrieval of

Subsystem) replaces the former Compliance Data System (CDS), the

AFS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Facility

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110001385661

FINDS:

Facility Function: Manufacturer

DUR-O-WAL WIRE INC (Continued) 1000139448

TC2800629.2s Page 61
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

additional ERNS detail in the EDR Site Report.

Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access 

4170 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster E

0.790 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

708 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

WSW 625 CRANE AVE N/A

E25 625 CRANE AVE ERNS 94379207

Status: Not reported

Inspector Name: Not reported

Next Inspection Date: 999999

Last Inspection Date: 11/1983

Burial Use: No

Incinerate Use: No

Redistribution Use: No

Store Material Use: No

License Use: Not reported

States Allowing Use: Not reported

Building: Not reported

Department: BRK ELECTRONICS DIVISION

Primary Program: Not reported

Institution Code: 15023

Contact Phone: Not reported

Contact Name: D.A.SCHOO, RAD.SAFETY OFFICER

Lic. Expiration Date: 10/31/1988

License Date: 11/01/1984

First License Date: 0

License Number: 12-15023-01

MLTS:

4407 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster F

0.835 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

719 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

West 780 MCCLURE AVENUE N/A

F26 PITTWAY CORP. MLTS 1001209972

Land type: Private

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (630) 585-7000

Contact country: US

 AURORA, IL 60507

Contact address: 780 MC CLURE RD

Contact: TONYUR FEDORA

 AURORA, IL 60507

Mailing address: 780 MCCLURE

EPA ID: ILD059458000

 AURORA, IL 60507

Facility address: 780 MC CLURE RD

Facility name: WORLD COLOR DIRECT IMAGING

Date form received by agency: 03/04/1997

RCRA-CESQG:

4407 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster F

0.835 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

719 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60507

West 780 MC CLURE RD FINDS ILD059458000

F27 WORLD COLOR DIRECT IMAGING RCRA-CESQG 1000422857

TC2800629.2s Page 62
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Off-site waste receiver: Verified to be non-commercial

Used oil transporter: No

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

Used oil processor: No

Used oil fuel burner: No

Furnace exemption: No

On-site burner exemption: No

Underground injection activity: No

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Unknown

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (203) 532-4266

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 GREENWICH, CT 06831

Owner/operator address: 340 PEMBERWICK RD

Owner/operator name: MILL THE

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: NAME NOT REPORTED

Owner/Operator Summary:

 hazardous waste

 the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely

 any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from

 time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of

 hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any

 from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely

 of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting

 land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less

 other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any

 waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or

 month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous

 or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar

 month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time;

Description: Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendar

Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator

WORLD COLOR DIRECT IMAGING (Continued) 1000422857

TC2800629.2s Page 63
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 04/10/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 07/02/1992

Date violation determined: 02/20/1992

Area of violation: Generators - Pre-transport

Regulation violated: SR - 722.134(d)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 04/10/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 07/02/1992

Date violation determined: 02/20/1992

Area of violation: Generators - Pre-transport

Regulation violated: SR - 722.134(d)(5)

Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:

 SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES.

 IN F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE

 ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED

 CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF

 FLUOROCARBONS; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS USED IN DEGREASING

 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, CARBON TETRACHLORIDE, AND CHLORINATED

 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE,

Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS USED IN DEGREASING:

Waste code: F001

 WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE.

 MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT

 WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE

 FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET,

 CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE

 LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS

Waste name: IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF

Waste code: D001

Waste name: Not Defined

Waste code: D000

Hazardous Waste Summary:

Classification: Large Quantity Generator

Site name: BRK ELECTRONICS

Facility name: WORLD COLOR DIRECT IMAGING

Date form received by agency: 06/18/1990

Historical Generators:

WORLD COLOR DIRECT IMAGING (Continued) 1000422857

TC2800629.2s Page 64
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

transported off-site.

these facilities release directly to air, water, land, or that are

from facilities on the amounts of over 300 listed toxic chemicals that

US EPA TRIS (Toxics Release Inventory System) contains information

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

of the Clean Air Act.

redesign to support facility operating permits required under Title V

estimation of total national emissions. AFS is undergoing a major

to comply with regulatory programs and by EPA as an input for the

AFS data are utilized by states to prepare State Implementation Plans

used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants.

information concerning airborne pollution in the United States. AFS is

Aerometric Data (SAROAD). AIRS is the national repository for

National Emission Data System (NEDS), and the Storage and Retrieval of

Subsystem) replaces the former Compliance Data System (CDS), the

AFS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Facility

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110001354819

FINDS:

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Area of violation: Not reported

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 10/24/1984

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 07/02/1992

Area of violation: Generators - Pre-transport

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 02/20/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Area of violation: Not reported

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE VISIT

Evaluation date: 03/17/1998

Evaluation Action Summary:

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

WORLD COLOR DIRECT IMAGING (Continued) 1000422857

TC2800629.2s Page 65
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Facility Address 2: Not reported

Facility ID: 28913

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: Not reported

Pollutant Code: Not reported

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Not reported

Year: Not reported

Emissions:

Year: 2006

Address Type Code: LOC

SIC Code: 2752

Cease Operation Date: Not reported

ID Number: 089800ABV

Lat/Long: 41.775400 / -88.276700

Contact Fax: 630-375-8503

Contact EMail: Not reported

Contact Extention: Not reported

Contact Tele: 630-375-8538

Contact Title: Not reported

Contact Name: David Wiseman

Facility Address 2: Not reported

Facility ID: 28913

IL AIRS:

their precursors, as well as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs).

on stationary and mobile sources that emit criteria air pollutants and

The NEI (National Emissions Inventory) database contains information

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

of the Clean Air Act.

redesign to support facility operating permits required under Title V

estimation of total national emissions. AFS is undergoing a major

to comply with regulatory programs and by EPA as an input for the

AFS data are utilized by states to prepare State Implementation Plans

used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants.

information concerning airborne pollution in the United States. AFS is

Aerometric Data (SAROAD). AIRS is the national repository for

National Emission Data System (NEDS), and the Storage and Retrieval of

Subsystem) replaces the former Compliance Data System (CDS), the

AFS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Facility

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110016689476

FINDS:

4407 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster F

0.835 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

719 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

West 780 MCCLURE RD AIRS N/A

F28 FREEDOM IMAGING SYSTEMS INC FINDS 1007153905

TC2800629.2s Page 66
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: Not reported

Pollutant Code: Not reported

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Not reported

Year: Not reported

Emissions:

Year: 2007

Address Type Code: Not reported

SIC Code: 2752

Cease Operation Date: Not reported

ID Number: 089800ABV

Lat/Long: Not reported

Contact Fax: Not reported

Contact EMail: Not reported

Contact Extention: Not reported

Contact Tele: 630-375-8538

Contact Title: Not reported

Contact Name: David Wiseman

FREEDOM IMAGING SYSTEMS INC (Continued) 1007153905

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: NAME NOT REPORTED

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 01/01/1900

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: Not reported

Owner/operator country: US

 Not reported

Owner/operator address: Not reported

Owner/operator name: BRK FIRE EXTINGUISHERS

Owner/Operator Summary:

Description: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste

Classification: Non-Generator

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (630) 851-7330

Contact country: Not reported

 Not reported

Contact address: Not reported

Contact: ENV COORDINATOR

EPA ID: ILD984780437

 AURORA, IL 60504

Facility address: 733 MCCLURE RD

Facility name: BRK FIRE EXTINGUISHERS

Date form received by agency: 04/01/2006

RCRA-NonGen:

4410 ft.

0.835 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

713 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504 AIRS

West 733 MCCLURE RD FINDS ILD984780437

29 BRK FIRE EXTINGUISHERS RCRA-NonGen 1000114172

TC2800629.2s Page 67
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Waste type: Pesticides

Generated waste on-site: No

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Lamps

Generated waste on-site: No

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Batteries

Universal Waste Summary:

Off-site waste receiver: Commercial status unknown

Used oil transporter: No

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

Used oil processor: No

Used oil fuel burner: No

Furnace exemption: No

On-site burner exemption: No

Underground injection activity: No

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: BRK ELECTRONICS INC

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 01/01/1900

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: Not reported

Owner/operator country: US

 Not reported

Owner/operator address: Not reported

Owner/operator name: BRK FIRE EXTINGUISHERS

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

BRK FIRE EXTINGUISHERS (Continued) 1000114172

TC2800629.2s Page 68
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Contact Name: Not reported

Facility Address 2: Not reported

Facility ID: 11426

IL AIRS:

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

of the Clean Air Act.

redesign to support facility operating permits required under Title V

estimation of total national emissions. AFS is undergoing a major

to comply with regulatory programs and by EPA as an input for the

AFS data are utilized by states to prepare State Implementation Plans

used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants.

information concerning airborne pollution in the United States. AFS is

Aerometric Data (SAROAD). AIRS is the national repository for

National Emission Data System (NEDS), and the Storage and Retrieval of

Subsystem) replaces the former Compliance Data System (CDS), the

AFS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Facility

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110001332763

FINDS:

Violation Status: No violations found

 WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE.

 MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT

 WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE

 FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET,

 CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE

 LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS

Waste name: IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF

Waste code: D001

Hazardous Waste Summary:

Classification: Large Quantity Generator

Facility name: BRK FIRE EXTINGUISHERS

Date form received by agency: 01/09/1990

Historical Generators:

Generated waste on-site: No

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Thermostats

Generated waste on-site: No

Accumulated waste on-site: No

BRK FIRE EXTINGUISHERS (Continued) 1000114172

TC2800629.2s Page 69
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: Not reported

Pollutant Code: Not reported

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Not reported

Year: Not reported

Emissions:

Year: Not reported

Address Type Code: LOC

SIC Code: 3999

Cease Operation Date: 8/28/1996

ID Number: 089800ABO

Lat/Long: Not reported

Contact Fax: Not reported

Contact EMail: Not reported

Contact Extention: Not reported

Contact Tele: Not reported

Contact Title: Not reported

BRK FIRE EXTINGUISHERS (Continued) 1000114172

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110018203139

FINDS:

4411 ft. Site 1 of 13 in cluster G

0.835 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

707 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60507

West 690 MCCLURE RD N/A

G30 CITY AUTO WRECKERS FINDS 1008123672

additional HMIRS detail in the EDR Site Report.

Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access 

4414 ft. Site 2 of 13 in cluster G

0.836 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

707 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 

West 685 MCCLURE RD N/A

G31 HMIRS 9998080428

TC2800629.2s Page 70
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

additional HMIRS detail in the EDR Site Report.

Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access 

4414 ft. Site 3 of 13 in cluster G

0.836 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

707 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 

West 685 MCCLURE RD N/A

G32 HMIRS 94060525

additional HMIRS detail in the EDR Site Report.

Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access 

4414 ft. Site 4 of 13 in cluster G

0.836 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

707 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 

West 685 MCCLURE ROAD N/A

G33 HMIRS 92080164

Date Started: Not reported

Action: SH

Priority Level: Not reported

Date Completed: 09/29/1995

Date Started: Not reported

Action: ARCHIVE SITE

Priority Level: NFRAP: No further Remedial Action planned

Date Completed: 06/10/1987

Date Started: Not reported

Action: SITE INSPECTION

Priority Level: Low priority for further assessment

Date Completed: 09/08/1986

Date Started: Not reported

Action: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT

Priority Level: Not reported

Date Completed: 10/01/1983

Date Started: Not reported

Action: DISCOVERY

CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History:

Contact Tel: (312) 353-5821

Contact Name: JANET PFUNDHELLER

Contact Title: RESPONSIBLE PARTY INVESTIGATOR

CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Name(s):

Non NPL Status: NFRAP

NPL Status: Not on the NPL

Federal Facility: Not a Federal Facility

Site ID: 0500449

CERC-NFRAP:

4414 ft. Site 5 of 13 in cluster G

0.836 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

707 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

West 685 MCCLURE ROAD ILD074373150

G34 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD (SIA) CERC-NFRAP 1003869972

TC2800629.2s Page 71
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Priority Level: Not reported

Date Completed: 09/29/1995

BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD (SIA) (Continued) 1003869972

additional HMIRS detail in the EDR Site Report.

Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access 

4414 ft. Site 6 of 13 in cluster G

0.836 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

707 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 

West 685 MC CLURE RD N/A

G35 HMIRS 9998060644

additional ERNS detail in the EDR Site Report.

Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access 

4414 ft. Site 7 of 13 in cluster G

0.836 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

707 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 

West 685 MCCLURE RD N/A

G36 685 MCCLURE RD ERNS 92281136

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Diesel Fuel

Tank Capacity: 10000

Tank Number: 2

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 3/8/1991

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Diesel Fuel

Tank Capacity: 10000

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Springfield, MO 65802

Owner Address: 3253 Chestnut Expressway

Owner Id: U0002161

Owner Name: Burlington Northern Railroad

Facility Type: Other

Facility Status: Closed

Facility ID: 2027513

UST:

4415 ft. Site 8 of 13 in cluster G

0.836 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

707 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

West 685 MCCLURE RD SPILLS N/A

G37 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RR UST U002113054

TC2800629.2s Page 72
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Exempt from registration

OSFM First Notify Date: 12/3/1992

Last Used Date: 6/1/1972

Tank Substance: Diesel Fuel

Tank Capacity: 175

Tank Number: 5

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Exempt from registration

OSFM First Notify Date: 8/24/1990

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Used Oil

Tank Capacity: 30000

Tank Number: 4

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 3/8/1991

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Diesel Fuel

Tank Capacity: 10000

Tank Number: 3

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 3/8/1991

BURLINGTON NORTHERN RR (Continued) U002113054

TC2800629.2s Page 73
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

PRP Name: BNSF RR

Facility City: AURORA

Facility Address: 685 MCCLURE RD

Incident ID: 20081580

PRP Name: BNSF RAILWAY

Facility City: AURORA

Facility Address: 685 MCCLURE RD

Incident ID: 20050306

PRP Name: BNSF RAILROAD

Facility City: AURORA

Facility Address: 685 MCCLURE RD

Incident ID: 20041629

SPILLS:

Fee Due: Not reported

BURLINGTON NORTHERN RR (Continued) U002113054

additional ERNS detail in the EDR Site Report.

Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access 

4415 ft. Site 9 of 13 in cluster G

0.836 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

707 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 

West 685 MCCLURE RD EOLA YARD N/A

G38 685 MCCLURE RD EOLA YARD ERNS 94360077

Facility Type: SITE REMEDIATION PROGRAM

Facility ID: 1214225010

CAT:

4415 ft. Site 10 of 13 in cluster G

0.836 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

707 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 

West CHESTNUT / JOHNSON STREET N/A

G39 BURLINGTON NORTHERN CAT 1000285775

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (630) 780-5171

Contact country: Not reported

 Not reported

Contact address: Not reported

Contact: ENV COORDINATOR

EPA ID: ILD128580727

 AURORA, IL 60504

Facility address: 685 MC CLURE RD

Facility name: BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD

Date form received by agency: 04/01/2006

RCRA-NonGen:

4415 ft. Site 11 of 13 in cluster G

0.836 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

707 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

West 685 MCCLURE ROAD FINDS ILD128580727

G40 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RCRA-NonGen 1000285762

TC2800629.2s Page 74
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Used oil processor: No

Used oil fuel burner: No

Furnace exemption: No

On-site burner exemption: No

Underground injection activity: No

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 01/01/1900

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: Not reported

Owner/operator country: US

 Not reported

Owner/operator address: Not reported

Owner/operator name: BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: NAME NOT REPORTED

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 01/01/1900

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: Not reported

Owner/operator country: US

 Not reported

Owner/operator address: Not reported

Owner/operator name: BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD

Owner/Operator Summary:

Description: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste

Classification: Non-Generator

EPA Region: 05

BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD (Continued) 1000285762

TC2800629.2s Page 75
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

discharge does not adversely affect water quality.

requirements, and include other provisions to ensure that the

limits on what can be discharged, impose monitoring and reporting

States are required to obtain a permit. The permit will likely contain

discharge pollutants from any point source into waters of the United

issued under the Clean Water Act. Under NPDES, all facilities that

the Compliance Information System (ICIS) tracks surface water permits

US National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) module of

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110005849172

FINDS:

Violation Status: No violations found

Waste name: POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENOLS (PCBs)

Waste code: X002

Hazardous Waste Summary:

Classification: Large Quantity Generator

Facility name: BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD

Date form received by agency: 01/17/1990

Historical Generators:

Generated waste on-site: No

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Thermostats

Generated waste on-site: No

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Pesticides

Generated waste on-site: No

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Lamps

Generated waste on-site: No

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Batteries

Universal Waste Summary:

Off-site waste receiver: Commercial status unknown

Used oil transporter: No

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD (Continued) 1000285762

TC2800629.2s Page 76
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES facilities.

Elimination System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the

information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge

PCS (Permit Compliance System) is a computerized management

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD (Continued) 1000285762

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Unknown

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (708) 780-5171

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 ST. PAUL, MN 55164

Owner/operator address: PO BOX 64960

Owner/operator name: BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: NAME NOT REPORTED

Owner/Operator Summary:

Description: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste

Classification: Non-Generator

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (708) 780-5171

Contact country: US

 ST PAUL, MN 55164

Contact address: PO BOX 64960

Contact: JOE FLEAGLE

 ST PAUL, MN 55164

Mailing address: PO BOX 64960

EPA ID: ILD137664694

 AURORA, IL 60504

Facility address: 685 MCCLURE RD

Facility name: BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD

Date form received by agency: 01/08/1990

RCRA-NonGen:

4415 ft. Site 12 of 13 in cluster G

0.836 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

707 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

West 685 MCCLURE RD LUST ILD137664694

G41 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RCRA-NonGen 1000285763

TC2800629.2s Page 77
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: Not reported

20 Report Received: Not reported

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 731

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60504

PRP Address: 685 McClure Rd.

PRP Contact: Mike Long

PRP Name: Burlington Northern Railroad

Email: Not reported

Project Manager Phone: Not reported

Project Manager: NOT ASSIGNED

IEMA Date: 9/3/1992

Product: Deisel

IL EPA Id: 0894075076

Incident Num: 922468

LUST:

Violation Status: No violations found

Waste name: POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENOLS (PCBs)

Waste code: X002

Hazardous Waste Summary:

Off-site waste receiver: Verified to be non-commercial

Used oil transporter: No

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

Used oil processor: No

Used oil fuel burner: No

Furnace exemption: No

On-site burner exemption: No

Underground injection activity: No

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD (Continued) 1000285763

Contact: MATTHEW WAUTELET

 AURORA, IL 60507

Mailing address: PO BOX 280

EPA ID: ILR000023762

 AURORA, IL 60507

Facility address: 2375 E LIBERTY ST

Facility name: BALLCO MFG INC

Date form received by agency: 07/02/1996

RCRA-SQG:

4425 ft.

0.838 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

717 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60507 AIRS

ESE 2375 E LIBERTY ST FINDS ILR000023762

42 BALLCO MFG INC RCRA-SQG 1001116356

TC2800629.2s Page 78
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

FINDS:

Violation Status: No violations found

 WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE.

 MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT

 WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE

 FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET,

 CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE

 LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS

Waste name: IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF

Waste code: D001

Hazardous Waste Summary:

Off-site waste receiver: Verified to be non-commercial

Used oil transporter: No

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

Used oil processor: No

Used oil fuel burner: No

Furnace exemption: No

On-site burner exemption: No

Underground injection activity: No

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Unknown

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (708) 898-1600

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 AURORA, IL 60507

Owner/operator address: 2375 E LIBERTY ST

Owner/operator name: BALLCO MFG INC

Owner/Operator Summary:

 hazardous waste at any time

 waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of

 hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous

 waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of

Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous

Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (708) 898-1600

Contact country: US

 AURORA, IL 60507

Contact address: PO BOX 280

BALLCO MFG INC (Continued) 1001116356

TC2800629.2s Page 79
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 11/07/03

Last Updated By: EPA2597

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Emissions:

Year: Not reported

Address Type Code: LOC

SIC Code: 3592

Cease Operation Date: 1/28/2004

ID Number: 043805AAO

Lat/Long: Not reported

Contact Fax: 630-898-7367

Contact EMail: Not reported

Contact Extention: Not reported

Contact Tele: 630-898-1600

Contact Title: Owner

Contact Name: Ozzie VanGelderen

Facility Address 2: PO Box 280

Facility ID: 4864

IL AIRS:

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

their precursors, as well as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs).

on stationary and mobile sources that emit criteria air pollutants and

The NEI (National Emissions Inventory) database contains information

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

of the Clean Air Act.

redesign to support facility operating permits required under Title V

estimation of total national emissions. AFS is undergoing a major

to comply with regulatory programs and by EPA as an input for the

AFS data are utilized by states to prepare State Implementation Plans

used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants.

information concerning airborne pollution in the United States. AFS is

Aerometric Data (SAROAD). AIRS is the national repository for

National Emission Data System (NEDS), and the Storage and Retrieval of

Subsystem) replaces the former Compliance Data System (CDS), the

AFS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Facility

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110006407931

BALLCO MFG INC (Continued) 1001116356

TC2800629.2s Page 80
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 05/28/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.22500

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 01/10/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 01/28/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 11/07/03

Last Updated By: EPA2597

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 11/07/03

Last Updated By: EPA2597

Tons per Year: 0.22500

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 01/28/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 11/07/03

Last Updated By: EPA2597

Tons per Year: 0.22500

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

BALLCO MFG INC (Continued) 1001116356

TC2800629.2s Page 81
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.22500

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: 07/08/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.22500

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 01/27/00

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 02/09/01

Last Updated By: EPA2520

Tons per Year: 0.22500

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 07/08/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.22500

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 01/14/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 07/08/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.22500

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

BALLCO MFG INC (Continued) 1001116356

TC2800629.2s Page 82
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.22500

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.22500

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.22500

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.22500

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: PART

BALLCO MFG INC (Continued) 1001116356

TC2800629.2s Page 83
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.22500

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.22500

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.22500

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.22500

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.22500

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.22500

BALLCO MFG INC (Continued) 1001116356

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110018174660

FINDS:

4492 ft.

0.851 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

718 ft.

1/2-1 EOLA, IL 60519

ENE POSS RD & 4TH ST N/A

43 GOODWIN, DAN/VEBER FINDS 1008120839

TC2800629.2s Page 84
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110018198699

FINDS:

4505 ft.

0.853 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

705 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

South 2315 E NEW YORK ST N/A

44 HEIMANN, MARY THERESE FINDS 1008123229

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110018198225

FINDS:

4580 ft. Site 1 of 16 in cluster H

0.867 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

712 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

South 2115 E NEW YORK ST N/A

H45 CAPITAL CONTROL LTD DBA FOX FINDS 1008123181

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2011

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 4/30/2009

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2011

Green Tag Issue Date: 3/3/2009

Green Tag Decal: K000430

Install Date: 7/9/2001

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Currently in use

OSFM First Notify Date: 9/28/2001

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 15000

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Boise, ID 83726

Owner Address: P.O. Box 20, Department 72405 A subsidiary of New Albertson’s, Inc.

Owner Id: U0033589

Owner Name: Jewel Food Stores, Inc.

Facility Type: Self-Service Station

Facility Status: Active

Facility ID: 2040463

UST:

4588 ft.

0.869 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

719 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

East 1127 NORTH EOLA ROAD N/A

46 JEWEL EXPRESS #3240 UST U003769844

TC2800629.2s Page 85
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2011

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 4/30/2009

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2011

Green Tag Issue Date: 3/3/2009

Green Tag Decal: K000430

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Does Not Exist

OSFM First Notify Date: Not reported

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 10000

Tank Number: 3

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2011

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 4/30/2009

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2011

Green Tag Issue Date: 3/3/2009

Green Tag Decal: K000430

Install Date: 7/9/2001

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Currently in use

OSFM First Notify Date: 9/28/2001

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 10000

Tank Number: 2

Fee Due: No

JEWEL EXPRESS #3240 (Continued) U003769844

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 1/16/1990

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 1000

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60505

Owner Address: 419 Hill Ave Dba Fox Valley Cycles

Owner Id: U0002387

Owner Name: Capital Control Ltd

Facility Type: None

Facility Status: Closed

Facility ID: 2025298

UST:

4589 ft. Site 2 of 16 in cluster H

0.869 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

712 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

South 2115 E NEW YORK ST N/A

H47 FOX VALLEY CYCLES UST U002113060

TC2800629.2s Page 86
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Fee Due: 600

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 1/16/1990

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 1000

Tank Number: 2

Fee Due: 600

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

FOX VALLEY CYCLES (Continued) U002113060

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: Not reported

20 Report Received: Not reported

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 731

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60507

PRP Address: P.O. Box 350

PRP Contact: Donovan Chester

PRP Name: Sports Rental

Email: Not reported

Project Manager Phone: Not reported

Project Manager: NOT ASSIGNED

IEMA Date: 2/16/1990

Product: Gasoline

IL EPA Id: 0894075150

Incident Num: 900434

LUST:

4589 ft. Site 3 of 16 in cluster H

0.869 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

712 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

South 2115 EAST NEW YORK ST. N/A

H48 CAPITAL CONTROL LUST S104527231

TC2800629.2s Page 87
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

Used oil processor: No

Used oil fuel burner: No

Furnace exemption: No

On-site burner exemption: No

Underground injection activity: No

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Unknown

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: NAME NOT REPORTED

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: SUPERIOR TOYOTA AMC JEEP INC

Owner/Operator Summary:

Description: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste

Classification: Non-Generator

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (312) 851-9400

Contact country: US

 AURORA, IL 60504

Contact address: 2121 E NEW YORK ST

Contact: LORI TAVES

EPA ID: ILD097280317

 AURORA, IL 60504

Facility address: 2121 E NEW YORK ST

Facility name: SUPERIOR TOYOTA AMC JEEP INC

Date form received by agency: 04/29/1987

RCRA-NonGen:

4590 ft. Site 4 of 16 in cluster H

0.869 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

712 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

South 2121 E NEW YORK ST FINDS ILD097280317

H49 SUPERIOR TOYOTA AMC JEEP INC RCRA-NonGen 1000215699

TC2800629.2s Page 88
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110005843891

FINDS:

Violation Status: No violations found

 SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES.

 F001, F002, AND F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE

 OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN

 BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE

 ACID, AND NITROBENZENE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING,

Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: CRESOLS AND CRESYLIC

Waste code: F004

 SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES.

 F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND

 OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE LISTED IN F001, F004, OR

 BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE

 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING,

 ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND

 CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE,

 METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE,

Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,

Waste code: F002

 WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE.

 MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT

 WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE

 FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET,

 CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE

 LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS

Waste name: IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF

Waste code: D001

Hazardous Waste Summary:

Off-site waste receiver: Verified to be non-commercial

Used oil transporter: No

SUPERIOR TOYOTA AMC JEEP INC (Continued) 1000215699

TC2800629.2s Page 89
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: 1/1/1976

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 4/24/1986

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Not reported

Tank Capacity: 1000

Tank Number: 3

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: 1/1/1976

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 4/24/1986

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Used Oil

Tank Capacity: 550

Tank Number: 2

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: 1/1/1976

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 4/24/1986

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 2000

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Naperville, IL 60540

Owner Address: 1535 W Ogden Ave

Owner Id: U0016591

Owner Name: Wolf Daniel A

Facility Type: Commercial / Retail

Facility Status: Closed

Facility ID: 2008500

UST:

4590 ft. Site 5 of 16 in cluster H

0.869 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

712 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

South 2121 E NEW YORK ST N/A

H50 OLD SUPERIOR TOYTA BLDG UST U001144819

TC2800629.2s Page 90
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: 1/1/1976

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 4/24/1986

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Not reported

Tank Capacity: 560

Tank Number: 4

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

OLD SUPERIOR TOYTA BLDG (Continued) U001144819

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 01/01/0001

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: Not reported

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 Not reported

Owner/operator address: Not reported

Owner/operator name: PROGRESSIVE TURNING

Owner/Operator Summary:

 hazardous waste at any time

 waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of

 hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous

 waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of

Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous

Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator

Land type: Private

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (630) 898-3072

Contact country: Not reported

 Not reported

Contact address: Not reported

Contact: ENV COORDINATOR

EPA ID: ILD984818021

 AURORA, IL 60505

Facility address: 1680 MOUNTAIN ST

Facility name: PROGRESSIVE TURNINGS INC

Date form received by agency: 04/01/2006

RCRA-SQG:

4606 ft. Site 13 of 13 in cluster G

0.872 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

708 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

West 1680 MOUNTAIN ST FINDS ILD984818021

G51 PROGRESSIVE TURNING RCRA-SQG 1000611594

TC2800629.2s Page 91
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Generated waste on-site: No

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Lamps

Generated waste on-site: No

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Batteries

Universal Waste Summary:

Off-site waste receiver: Commercial status unknown

Used oil transporter: No

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

Used oil processor: No

Used oil fuel burner: No

Furnace exemption: No

On-site burner exemption: No

Underground injection activity: No

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: Not reported

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 Not reported

Owner/operator address: Not reported

Owner/operator name: PROGRESSIVE TURNING

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 01/01/1900

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: Not reported

Owner/operator country: US

 Not reported

Owner/operator address: Not reported

Owner/operator name: PROGRESSIVE TURNINGS INC

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 01/01/1900

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: Not reported

Owner/operator country: US

 Not reported

Owner/operator address: Not reported

Owner/operator name: PROGRESSIVE TURNINGS INC

PROGRESSIVE TURNING (Continued) 1000611594

TC2800629.2s Page 92
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Area of violation: Not reported

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE VISIT

Evaluation date: 03/31/1998

Evaluation Action Summary:

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: Not reported

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: Not reported

 Enforcement action: Not reported

Violation lead agency: Not reported

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Date violation determined: Not reported

Area of violation: Not reported

Regulation violated: Not reported

Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:

 WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE.

 MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT

 WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE

 FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET,

 CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE

 LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS

Waste name: IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF

Waste code: D001

 WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE.

 MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT

 WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE

 FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET,

 CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE

 LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS

Waste name: IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF

Waste code: D001

Hazardous Waste Summary:

Classification: Large Quantity Generator

Facility name: PROGRESSIVE TURNINGS INC

Date form received by agency: 03/21/1991

Classification: Small Quantity Generator

Facility name: PROGRESSIVE TURNINGS INC

Date form received by agency: 03/17/1998

Historical Generators:

Generated waste on-site: No

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Thermostats

Generated waste on-site: No

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Pesticides

PROGRESSIVE TURNING (Continued) 1000611594

TC2800629.2s Page 93
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110006404471

FINDS:

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Area of violation: Not reported

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE VISIT

Evaluation date: 03/17/1998

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

PROGRESSIVE TURNING (Continued) 1000611594

Remediation Applicant Company: Not reported

Remediation Applicant Name: Not reported

Remediation Applicant Title: Mr.

Remediation Applicant Co: Gartner Buick-Peugeot, Inc.

No Further Remediation Letter Dt: Not reported

Total Acres: 6.3

Active: False

NFR Recorded: Not reported

Sec. 4 Letter Date: 1/27/1995

Proj Mgr Assigned: Bynum

Consultant Phone: (630) 495-0707

Consultant City,St,Zip: Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181

Consultant Address2: Suite 800-PMB 8008

Consultant Address: 2 Mid America Plaza

Consultant Company: Schrack Environmental Consulting, Inc.

Point Of Contact: Ronald W. Schrack, P.E.

Date Enrolled: 2/3/1994

Contact Phone: (630) 851-2500

Contact City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60504

Contact Address2: Not reported

Contact Address: 2424 East New York Street

Contact Name: Roland Gartner

Latitude: 41.7602

Longitude: -88.25777

US EPA Id: ILD097165211

IL EPA Id: 0434075026

SRP:

4626 ft. Site 6 of 16 in cluster H

0.876 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

South 2424 EAST NEW YORK STREET N/A

H52 GARTNER BUICK SRP S104491824

TC2800629.2s Page 94
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Acres: Not reported

Worker Caution: Not reported

Barrier: Not reported

Institutional Controls: Not reported

Comprehensive/Focused: Not reported

Site Type: Not reported

NFR Letter Date Recorded: Not reported

NFR Letter: Not reported

Site Name: Not reported

Illinois EPA: Not reported

Remediation Applicant City,St,Zip: Not reported

Remediation Applicant Address 2: Not reported

Remediation Applicant Address: Not reported

GARTNER BUICK (Continued) S104491824

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: GARTNER ROLAND

Owner/Operator Summary:

 hazardous waste

 the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely

 any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from

 time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of

 hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any

 from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely

 of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting

 land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less

 other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any

 waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or

 month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous

 or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar

 month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time;

Description: Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendar

Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (630) 375-9000

Contact country: US

 AURORA, IL 60504

Contact address: 2424 E NEW YORK ST

Contact: DAVID ZILLY

EPA ID: ILD097165211

 AURORA, IL 60504

Facility address: 2424 E NEW YORK ST

Facility name: GARTNER COLLISION REVISION

Date form received by agency: 04/25/2003

RCRA-CESQG:

4626 ft. Site 7 of 16 in cluster H

0.876 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504 MANIFEST

South 2424 E NEW YORK ST FINDS ILD097165211

H53 GARTNER COLLISION REVISION RCRA-CESQG 1004692909

TC2800629.2s Page 95
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

of the Clean Air Act.

redesign to support facility operating permits required under Title V

estimation of total national emissions. AFS is undergoing a major

to comply with regulatory programs and by EPA as an input for the

AFS data are utilized by states to prepare State Implementation Plans

used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants.

information concerning airborne pollution in the United States. AFS is

Aerometric Data (SAROAD). AIRS is the national repository for

National Emission Data System (NEDS), and the Storage and Retrieval of

Subsystem) replaces the former Compliance Data System (CDS), the

AFS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Facility

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110005843597

FINDS:

Violation Status: No violations found

Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator

Site name: GARTNER BUICK PEUGEOT

Facility name: GARTNER COLLISION REVISION

Date form received by agency: 12/12/1989

Historical Generators:

Off-site waste receiver: Commercial status unknown

Used oil transporter: No

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

Used oil processor: No

Used oil fuel burner: No

Furnace exemption: No

On-site burner exemption: No

Underground injection activity: No

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 04/25/2003

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (630) 375-9000

Owner/operator country: US

 AURORA, IL 60504

Owner/operator address: 2424 E NEW YORK ST

Owner/operator name: GARTNER COLLISION REVISION

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 01/01/0001

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

GARTNER COLLISION REVISION (Continued) 1004692909

TC2800629.2s Page 96
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Waste Amount: Not reported

Waste Code: Not reported

Waste Line No: Not reported

Waste Page No: Not reported

Manifest DOC ID: Not reported

TRAN Date: Not reported

TRAN ORDER NO: Not reported

TRAN EPA ID: Not reported

Mifest DOC ID: Not reported

WI MANIFEST TRANS: -

Waste LBS: Not reported

Unit of Measure: Not reported

Waste Amount: Not reported

Waste Code: Not reported

Waste Line No: Not reported

Waste Page No: Not reported

Manifest DOC ID: Not reported

TSG Copy Revd Date: Not reported

GEN Copy Revd Date: Not reported

TSD EPA ID: Not reported

TSD Date: Not reported

Gen Date: Not reported

Gen EPA ID: Not reported

Copy Type: Not reported

Manifest DOC ID: Not reported

WI MANIFEST SHIP: -

Contact Email Address: Not reported

Contact Extention: Not reported

Contact Telephone: Not reported

Contact Zip: Not reported

Contact City: Not reported

Contact State: Not reported

Contact Address: Not reported

Contact Title: Not reported

Contact Last Name: Not reported

Contact First Name: Not reported

ACT Name: HW Generator - Very Small

ACT Code 1: 203

ACT Status: A

ACT Code: 203

FID: 0

EPA ID: ILD097165211

Year: 04

WI MANIFEST:

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

GARTNER COLLISION REVISION (Continued) 1004692909

TC2800629.2s Page 97
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Waste LBS: Not reported

Unit of Measure: Not reported

Waste Amount: Not reported

Waste Code: Not reported

Waste Line No: Not reported

Waste Page No: Not reported

Manifest DOC ID: Not reported

TRAN Date: Not reported

TRAN ORDER NO: Not reported

TRAN EPA ID: Not reported

Mifest DOC ID: Not reported

WI MANIFEST TRANS: -

Waste LBS: Not reported

Unit of Measure: Not reported

Waste Amount: Not reported

Waste Code: Not reported

Waste Line No: Not reported

Waste Page No: Not reported

Manifest DOC ID: Not reported

TSG Copy Revd Date: Not reported

GEN Copy Revd Date: Not reported

TSD EPA ID: Not reported

TSD Date: Not reported

Gen Date: Not reported

Gen EPA ID: Not reported

Copy Type: Not reported

Manifest DOC ID: Not reported

WI MANIFEST SHIP: -

Contact Email Address: Not reported

Contact Extention: Not reported

Contact Telephone: 0

Contact Zip: 0

Contact City: Not reported

Contact State: Not reported

Contact Address: Not reported

Contact Title: Not reported

Contact Last Name: Not reported

Contact First Name: Not reported

ACT Name: HW Generator - Very Small

ACT Code 1: 203

ACT Status: A

ACT Code: 203

FID: 0

EPA ID: ILD097165211

Year: 05

Waste LBS: Not reported

Unit of Measure: Not reported

GARTNER COLLISION REVISION (Continued) 1004692909

TC2800629.2s Page 98
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: 11/9/1993

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 2/29/1992

20 Report Received: 8/25/1992

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 731

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60504

PRP Address: 2424 East New York St.

PRP Contact: Vic Fazio

PRP Name: Gartner Buick

Email: Not reported

Project Manager Phone: Not reported

Project Manager: Rominger

IEMA Date: 5/26/1992

Product: Gasoline

IL EPA Id: 0434075026

Incident Num: 921404

LUST:

4626 ft. Site 8 of 16 in cluster H

0.876 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

South 2424 EAST NEW YORK ST. N/A

H54 GARTNER BUICK LUST S104524904

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: Not reported

Pollutant Code: Not reported

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Not reported

Year: Not reported

Emissions:

Year: Not reported

Address Type Code: LOC

SIC Code: Not reported

Cease Operation Date: Not reported

ID Number: 043407AAL

Lat/Long: Not reported

Contact Fax: Not reported

Contact EMail: Not reported

Contact Extention: Not reported

Contact Tele: Not reported

Contact Title: Not reported

Contact Name: Not reported

Facility Address 2: Not reported

Facility ID: 29360

IL AIRS:

4626 ft. Site 9 of 16 in cluster H

0.876 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 

South 2424 EAST NEW YORK ST. N/A

H55 GARTNER COLLISION REVISION AIRS S107742198

TC2800629.2s Page 99
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 4/12/1986

Last Used Date: 5/1/1992

Tank Substance: Used Oil

Tank Capacity: 1000

Tank Number: 3

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 4/12/1986

Last Used Date: 5/1/1992

Tank Substance: Not reported

Tank Capacity: 550

Tank Number: 2

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 4/12/1986

Last Used Date: 2/25/1992

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 1000

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60504

Owner Address: 2424 E New York St

Owner Id: U0005649

Owner Name: Gartner Buick Peugeot Inc

Facility Type: Auto Dealer

Facility Status: Closed

Facility ID: 2019490

UST:

4626 ft. Site 10 of 16 in cluster H

0.876 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

South 2424 E NEW YORK ST N/A

H56 GERTNER BUICK PEUGEOT INC UST U001144734

TC2800629.2s Page 100
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: 1/1/1902

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 9/9/1991

Last Used Date: 5/1/1992

Tank Substance: Not reported

Tank Capacity: 550

Tank Number: 5

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Exempt from registration

OSFM First Notify Date: 4/12/1986

Last Used Date: 9/1/1979

Tank Substance: Not reported

Tank Capacity: 280

Tank Number: 4

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

GERTNER BUICK PEUGEOT INC (Continued) U001144734

Emissions:

Year: Not reported

Address Type Code: LOC

SIC Code: Not reported

Cease Operation Date: 4/5/2004

ID Number: 089800ABU

Lat/Long: Not reported

Contact Fax: Not reported

Contact EMail: Not reported

Contact Extention: Not reported

Contact Tele: 630-375-9000

Contact Title: A Managing Partner

Contact Name: Gred Gade

Facility Address 2: Not reported

Facility ID: 28337

IL AIRS:

4626 ft. Site 11 of 16 in cluster H

0.876 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 

South 2424 E NEW YORK N/A

H57 GARTNER COLLISION REVISION AIRS S107742197

TC2800629.2s Page 101
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: Not reported

Pollutant Code: Not reported

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Not reported

Year: Not reported

GARTNER COLLISION REVISION (Continued) S107742197

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 4/29/1986

Last Used Date: 4/1/1988

Tank Substance: Not reported

Tank Capacity: 500

Tank Number: 2

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 4/29/1986

Last Used Date: 4/1/1988

Tank Substance: Not reported

Tank Capacity: 500

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60504

Owner Address: 2170 E New York St

Owner Id: U0015593

Owner Name: Valley Imports Inc

Facility Type: None

Facility Status: Closed

Facility ID: 2011563

UST:

4655 ft. Site 12 of 16 in cluster H

0.882 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

South 2170 E NEW YORK ST N/A

H58 VALLEY IMPORTS INC UST U000793950

TC2800629.2s Page 102
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Used oil processor: Unknown

Used oil fuel burner: Unknown

Furnace exemption: Unknown

On-site burner exemption: Unknown

Underground injection activity: Unknown

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: Unknown

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: Unknown

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Unknown

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: Unknown

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: NAME NOT REPORTED

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 10/27/2000

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (630) 357-1200

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 NAPERVILLE, IL 60540

Owner/operator address: 1564 W OGDEN AVE

Owner/operator name: AURORA INVESTMENT LLC

Owner/Operator Summary:

 hazardous waste at any time

 waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of

 hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous

 waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of

Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous

Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (630) 357-1200

Contact country: US

 AURORA, IL 60504

Contact address: 2170 E NEW YORK ST

Contact: RICH KRUKIEWICZ

EPA ID: ILD047908686

 AURORA, IL 60504

Facility address: 2170 E NEW YORK ST

Facility name: JACOBS BILL AURORA INC

Date form received by agency: 08/12/2009

RCRA-SQG:

4655 ft. Site 13 of 16 in cluster H

0.882 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

South 2170 E NEW YORK ST FINDS ILD047908686

H59 BILL JACOBS AURORA INC RCRA-SQG 1000283001

TC2800629.2s Page 103
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110005829504

FINDS:

Violation Status: No violations found

Waste name: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE

Waste code: D039

Hazardous Waste Summary:

Classification: Small Quantity Generator

Facility name: JACOBS BILL AURORA INC

Date form received by agency: 10/16/1986

Classification: Small Quantity Generator

Facility name: JACOBS BILL AURORA INC

Date form received by agency: 10/25/2000

Historical Generators:

Generated waste on-site: Not reported

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Thermostats

Generated waste on-site: Not reported

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Pesticides

Generated waste on-site: Not reported

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Lamps

Generated waste on-site: Not reported

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Batteries

Universal Waste Summary:

Off-site waste receiver: Verified to be non-commercial

Used oil transporter: Unknown

Used oil transfer facility: Unknown

Used oil Specification marketer: Unknown

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: Unknown

User oil refiner: Unknown

BILL JACOBS AURORA INC (Continued) 1000283001

TC2800629.2s Page 104
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

NFR Date Recorded: 11/17/2000

NFA/NFR Letter: 6/19/2000

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 3/17/2000

20 Report Received: 3/17/2000

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 732

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Hinsdale, IL 60521

PRP Address: 493 Old Surrey Rd.

PRP Contact: James Kornak

PRP Name: Norb Kornak Oldsmobile

Email: Not reported

Project Manager Phone: (217) 782-6762

Project Manager: Reynolds

IEMA Date: 11/9/1999

Product: Gasoline, Uset Oil

IL EPA Id: 0894075080

Incident Num: 992513

LUST:

4655 ft. Site 14 of 16 in cluster H

0.882 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

South 2175 NEW YORK ST. N/A

H60 NORB KORNAK OLDSMOBILE LUST S104190535

 hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any

 from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely

 of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting

 land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less

 other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any

 waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or

 month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous

 or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar

 month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time;

Description: Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendar

Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (312) 898-8750

Contact country: US

 AURORA, IL 60507

Contact address: P O BOX 1584

Contact: RICK JOHNSON

 AURORA, IL 60507

Mailing address: P O BOX 1584

EPA ID: ILD024934366

 AURORA, IL 60505

Facility address: 2175 E NEW YORK ST

Facility name: KORNAK NORB OLDS INC

Date form received by agency: 05/13/1998

RCRA-CESQG:

4655 ft. Site 15 of 16 in cluster H

0.882 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

South 2175 E NEW YORK ST FINDS ILD024934366

H61 NORB KORNAK OLDS INC RCRA-CESQG 1000307054

TC2800629.2s Page 105
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Used oil fuel burner: No

Furnace exemption: Unknown

On-site burner exemption: Unknown

Underground injection activity: No

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Unknown

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: Unknown

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 01/01/0001

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: NAME NOT REPORTED

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 01/01/0001

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: KORNAK NORBERT

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: NAME NOT REPORTED

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: KORNAK NORBERT

Owner/Operator Summary:

 hazardous waste

 the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely

 any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from

 time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of

NORB KORNAK OLDS INC (Continued) 1000307054

TC2800629.2s Page 106
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110005821361

FINDS:

Violation Status: No violations found

 WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE.

 MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT

 WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE

 FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET,

 CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE

 LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS

Waste name: IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF

Waste code: D001

 WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE.

 MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT

 WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE

 FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET,

 CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE

 LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS

Waste name: IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF

Waste code: D001

Hazardous Waste Summary:

Classification: Small Quantity Generator

Facility name: KORNAK NORB OLDS INC

Date form received by agency: 08/12/1987

Historical Generators:

Off-site waste receiver: Commercial status unknown

Used oil transporter: No

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

Used oil processor: No

NORB KORNAK OLDS INC (Continued) 1000307054

TC2800629.2s Page 107
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: 10/1/1976

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 3/26/1986

Last Used Date: 10/1/1998

Tank Substance: Transmission Oil

Tank Capacity: 500

Tank Number: 3

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: 10/1/1976

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 3/26/1986

Last Used Date: 10/1/1998

Tank Substance: New Oil

Tank Capacity: 1000

Tank Number: 2

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: 10/1/1976

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 3/26/1986

Last Used Date: 10/1/1998

Tank Substance: Used Oil

Tank Capacity: 500

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Hinsdale, IL 60521

Owner Address: 220 N. County Line Road

Owner Id: U0030483

Owner Name: Kornak Family Limited Partnership

Facility Type: Auto Dealer

Facility Status: Closed

Facility ID: 2006184

UST:

4655 ft. Site 16 of 16 in cluster H

0.882 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

South 2175 EAST NEW YORK STREET N/A

H62 NORB KORNAK OLDS, INC. UST U000867480

TC2800629.2s Page 108
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: 10/1/1976

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 3/26/1986

Last Used Date: 10/1/1998

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 5000

Tank Number: 4

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

NORB KORNAK OLDS, INC. (Continued) U000867480

20 Report Received: Not reported

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 731

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Arden Hills, MN 55126

PRP Address: 4105 North Lexington Ave.

PRP Contact: Greg Jeffries

PRP Name: Burlington Northern Railroad

Email: Bradley.Dilbaitis@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 785-8378

Project Manager: Dilbaitis

IEMA Date: Not reported

Product: Fuel Oil

IL EPA Id: 0438995008

Incident Num: 881712

LUST:

Site Size: 10

Year Entered: Not reported

Year Completed: Not reported

US Epaid: Not reported

SSU Status: Active

Current Program: SSU

Region: Des Plaines

 from the bridge.

 Aurora Road and go west to Eola Road. Go south. Train yard is visible

Directions: Take I-55 North to Route 30 West to Route 59 North. Take this to North

Lat/Long: 41.7703514 / -88.257331

Facility Type: Railroad - locomotive collision

Facility ID: 0438995008

SHWS:

4668 ft.

0.884 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

723 ft.

1/2-1 EOLA, IL 60519

ENE MCCLURE AVENUE LUST N/A

63 BURLINGTON NORTHERN - EOLA SHWS S106781196

TC2800629.2s Page 109
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

NFR Date Recorded: 3/21/2005

NFA/NFR Letter: 1/31/2005

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: Not reported

BURLINGTON NORTHERN - EOLA (Continued) S106781196

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110018368611

FINDS:

4774 ft. Site 1 of 6 in cluster I

0.904 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

WSW 1666 DEARBORN AVE N/A

I64 PDI INDUSTRIES INC FINDS 1008140145

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: 4/14/1993

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 2/8/1993

20 Report Received: 12/18/1992

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 731

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60507

PRP Address: P.O. Box 2375

PRP Contact: Bob Hollis

PRP Name: P.D.I. Industries

Email: Not reported

Project Manager Phone: Not reported

Project Manager: Irwin

IEMA Date: 12/1/1992

Product: Fuel Oil

IL EPA Id: 0890050013

Incident Num: 923407

LUST:

4774 ft. Site 2 of 6 in cluster I

0.904 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

WSW 1666 DEARBORN N/A

I65 P.D.I. INDUSTRIES LUST S104003493

TC2800629.2s Page 110
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Exempt from registration

OSFM First Notify Date: 12/28/1993

Last Used Date: 1/1/1968

Tank Substance: Not reported

Tank Capacity: 500

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60505

Owner Address: 1666 Dearborn St

Owner Id: U0020758

Owner Name: Hollis Robert

Facility Type: Industrial / Manufacturing

Facility Status: Exempt

Facility ID: 2031422

UST:

4774 ft. Site 3 of 6 in cluster I

0.904 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

WSW 1666 DEARBORN ST N/A

I66 HOLLIS ROBERT UST U000867454

 hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any

 from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely

 of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting

 land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less

 other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any

 waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or

 month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous

 or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar

 month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time;

Description: Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendar

Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (630) 896-3040

Contact country: Not reported

 Not reported

Contact address: Not reported

Contact: ENV COORDINATOR

EPA ID: ILR000160564

 AURORA, IL 60505

Facility address: 1660 DEARBORN AVE

Facility name: FERNANDOS BODY WORKS

Date form received by agency: 12/23/2009

RCRA-CESQG:

4799 ft. Site 4 of 6 in cluster I

0.909 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

WSW 1660 DEARBORN AVE ILR000160564

I67 FERNANDOS BODY WORKS RCRA-CESQG 1012210762

TC2800629.2s Page 111
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Generated waste on-site: Not reported

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Pesticides

Generated waste on-site: Not reported

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Lamps

Generated waste on-site: Not reported

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Batteries

Universal Waste Summary:

Off-site waste receiver: Commercial status unknown

Used oil transporter: No

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

Used oil processor: No

Used oil fuel burner: No

Furnace exemption: No

On-site burner exemption: No

Underground injection activity: No

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 12/23/2009

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: Not reported

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 Not reported

Owner/operator address: Not reported

Owner/operator name: FERNANDOS BODY WORKS

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 12/23/2009

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: Not reported

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 Not reported

Owner/operator address: Not reported

Owner/operator name: FERNANDOS BODY WORKS

Owner/Operator Summary:

 hazardous waste

 the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely

 any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from

 time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of

FERNANDOS BODY WORKS (Continued) 1012210762

TC2800629.2s Page 112
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Violation Status: No violations found

Generated waste on-site: Not reported

Accumulated waste on-site: No

Waste type: Thermostats

FERNANDOS BODY WORKS (Continued) 1012210762

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110040318803

FINDS:

4799 ft. Site 5 of 6 in cluster I

0.909 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

WSW 1660 DEARBORN AVE N/A

I68 FERNANDOS BODY WORKS FINDS 1012297808

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 8/14/2008

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Green Tag Issue Date: 5/1/2008

Green Tag Decal: J000465

Install Date: 8/1/1997

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Currently in use

OSFM First Notify Date: 11/18/1997

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 15000

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Dallas, TX 752210711

Owner Address: P.O. Box 711

Owner Id: U0014207

Owner Name: 7 -Eleven, Inc.

Facility Type: Self-Service Station

Facility Status: Active

Facility ID: 2035697

UST:

4818 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster J

0.913 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

718 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60514

ENE 1202 NORTH EOLA N/A

J69 7-ELEVEN #32202 UST U003559101

TC2800629.2s Page 113
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 8/14/2008

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Green Tag Issue Date: 5/1/2008

Green Tag Decal: J000465

Install Date: 8/1/1997

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Currently in use

OSFM First Notify Date: 11/18/1997

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 10000

Tank Number: 3

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 8/14/2008

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Green Tag Issue Date: 5/1/2008

Green Tag Decal: J000465

Install Date: 8/1/1997

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Currently in use

OSFM First Notify Date: 11/18/1997

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 10000

Tank Number: 2

7-ELEVEN #32202 (Continued) U003559101

Date Started: Not reported

Action: DISCOVERY

CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History:

Description: RCRA Deferral - Lead Confirmed

Description: RCRA Deferral Audit

Program Priority:

Contact Tel: (312) 353-5821

Contact Name: JANET PFUNDHELLER

Contact Title: RESPONSIBLE PARTY INVESTIGATOR

CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Name(s):

Non NPL Status: Deferred to RCRA

NPL Status: Not on the NPL

Federal Facility: Not a Federal Facility

Site ID: 0507014

CERC-NFRAP:

4829 ft. Site 6 of 6 in cluster I

0.915 mi. FINDS

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505 RCRA-NonGen

WSW 1666 NORTH DEARBORN CORRACTS ILD005071949

I70 P C DISPLAY FINISHERS INC CERC-NFRAP 1000703663

TC2800629.2s Page 114
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

 AURORA, IL 60504

Owner/operator address: PO BOX 1324

Owner/operator name: ROBERT J HOLLIS

Owner/Operator Summary:

Description: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste

Classification: Non-Generator

Land type: Private

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (630) 896-1274

Contact country: Not reported

 Not reported

Contact address: Not reported

Contact: ENV COORDINATOR

EPA ID: ILD005071949

 AURORA, IL 60505

Facility address: 1666 DEARBORN AVE

Facility name: PC DISPLAY FINISHERS INC

Date form received by agency: 11/01/2007

RCRA-NonGen:

Schedule end date: Not reported

Original schedule date: Not reported

NAICS Code(s): Not reported

 corrective action priority

Action: CA075LO - CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a low

Actual Date: 09/14/1992

Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY

EPA Region: 05

EPA ID: ILD005071949

Schedule end date: Not reported

Original schedule date: Not reported

NAICS Code(s): Not reported

Action: CA070NO - RFA Determination Of Need For An RFI, RFI is Not Necessary

Actual Date: 05/01/2009

Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY

EPA Region: 05

EPA ID: ILD005071949

CORRACTS:

Priority Level: Not reported

Date Completed: 09/26/1995

Date Started: Not reported

Action: ARCHIVE SITE

Priority Level: Deferred to RCRA (Subtitle C)

Date Completed: 12/04/1992

Date Started: Not reported

Action: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT

Priority Level: Not reported

Date Completed: 04/27/1992

P C DISPLAY FINISHERS INC (Continued) 1000703663

TC2800629.2s Page 115
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL

Waste code: F005

 THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES.

 LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF

 ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS

 CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF

 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS

 KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE,

Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL

Waste code: F005

Hazardous Waste Summary:

Classification: Large Quantity Generator

Facility name: PC DISPLAY FINISHERS INC

Date form received by agency: 08/15/1980

Classification: Not a generator, verified

Facility name: PC DISPLAY FINISHERS INC

Date form received by agency: 11/18/1980

Historical Generators:

Off-site waste receiver: Commercial status unknown

Used oil transporter: No

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

Used oil processor: No

Used oil fuel burner: No

Furnace exemption: No

On-site burner exemption: No

Underground injection activity: No

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 898-2136

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, IL 99998

Owner/operator address: PO BOX 1324

Owner/operator name: ROBERT J HOLLIS

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 898-2136

Owner/operator country: Not reported

P C DISPLAY FINISHERS INC (Continued) 1000703663

TC2800629.2s Page 116
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 02/25/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 11/13/1992

Date violation determined: 12/30/1991

Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure

Regulation violated: SR - 725.212(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 08/26/1992

 Enforcement action: VIOLATION NOTICE (VN)

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 11/13/1992

Date violation determined: 12/30/1991

Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure

Regulation violated: SR - 725.212(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 08/26/1992

 Enforcement action: VIOLATION NOTICE (VN)

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/05/1994

Date violation determined: 12/30/1991

Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure

Regulation violated: SR - 725.211

Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:

Event: RFA Determination Of Need For An RFI, RFI is Not Necessary;

Event date: 05/01/2009

 action priority.

Event: CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a low corrective

Event date: 09/14/1992

Corrective Action Summary:

 THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES.

 LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF

 ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS

 CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF

 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS

 KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE,

P C DISPLAY FINISHERS INC (Continued) 1000703663

TC2800629.2s Page 117
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 03/09/1990

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/05/1994

Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 12/30/1991

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 11/13/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 12/30/1991

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/05/1994

Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 12/27/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Area of violation: Not reported

Evaluation: FOCUSED COMPLIANCE INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 12/27/1993

Evaluation Action Summary:

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/15/1988

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 08/26/1988

Date violation determined: 02/02/1988

Area of violation: TSD - General

Regulation violated: Not reported

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 02/25/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/05/1994

Date violation determined: 12/30/1991

Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure

Regulation violated: SR - 725.211

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

P C DISPLAY FINISHERS INC (Continued) 1000703663

TC2800629.2s Page 118
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110005812503

FINDS:

Evaluation lead agency: EPA

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Area of violation: Not reported

Evaluation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW

Evaluation date: 02/02/1988

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 08/26/1988

Area of violation: TSD - General

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 02/02/1988

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Area of violation: Not reported

P C DISPLAY FINISHERS INC (Continued) 1000703663

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110018385996

FINDS:

4869 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster J

0.922 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

718 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

ENE 1207 N EOLA RD N/A

J71 BP AMOCO FINDS 1007692534

TC2800629.2s Page 119
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Contact Last Name: Not reported

Contact First Name: Not reported

ACT Name: HW Generator - Small

ACT Code 1: 202

ACT Status: A

ACT Code: 202

FID: 0

EPA ID: ILR000131300

Year: 05

WI MANIFEST:

Violation Status: No violations found

Classification: Small Quantity Generator

Facility name: BP AMOCO

Date form received by agency: 09/02/2004

Historical Generators:

Off-site waste receiver: Commercial status unknown

Used oil transporter: No

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

Used oil processor: No

Used oil fuel burner: No

Furnace exemption: No

On-site burner exemption: No

Underground injection activity: No

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No

Handler Activities Summary:

Description: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste

Classification: Non-Generator

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (219) 838-5138

Contact country: Not reported

 Not reported

Contact address: Not reported

Contact: DAVID PORTER

 ARTESIA, 907026038

Mailing address: PO BOX 6038

EPA ID: ILR000131300

 AURORA, IL 60504

Facility address: 1207 N EOLA RD

Facility name: BP AMOCO

Date form received by agency: 11/01/2007

RCRA-NonGen:

4869 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster J

0.922 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

718 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

ENE 1207 N EOLA RD MANIFEST ILR000131300

J72 BP AMOCO RCRA-NonGen 1007570025

TC2800629.2s Page 120
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Contact Email Address: Not reported

Contact Extention: Not reported

Contact Telephone: Not reported

Contact Zip: Not reported

Contact City: Not reported

Contact State: Not reported

Contact Address: Not reported

Contact Title: Not reported

Contact Last Name: Not reported

Contact First Name: Not reported

ACT Name: HW Generator - Small

ACT Code 1: 202

ACT Status: A

ACT Code: 202

FID: 0

EPA ID: ILR000131300

Year: 06

Waste LBS: Not reported

Unit of Measure: Not reported

Waste Amount: Not reported

Waste Code: Not reported

Waste Line No: Not reported

Waste Page No: Not reported

Manifest DOC ID: Not reported

TRAN Date: Not reported

TRAN ORDER NO: Not reported

TRAN EPA ID: Not reported

Mifest DOC ID: Not reported

WI MANIFEST TRANS: -

Waste LBS: Not reported

Unit of Measure: Not reported

Waste Amount: Not reported

Waste Code: Not reported

Waste Line No: Not reported

Waste Page No: Not reported

Manifest DOC ID: Not reported

TSG Copy Revd Date: Not reported

GEN Copy Revd Date: Not reported

TSD EPA ID: Not reported

TSD Date: Not reported

Gen Date: Not reported

Gen EPA ID: Not reported

Copy Type: Not reported

Manifest DOC ID: Not reported

WI MANIFEST SHIP: -

Contact Email Address: Not reported

Contact Extention: Not reported

Contact Telephone: 0

Contact Zip: 0

Contact City: Not reported

Contact State: Not reported

Contact Address: Not reported

Contact Title: Not reported

BP AMOCO (Continued) 1007570025

TC2800629.2s Page 121
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

GEN Copy Revd Date: Not reported

TSD EPA ID: Not reported

TSD Date: Not reported

Gen Date: Not reported

Gen EPA ID: Not reported

Copy Type: Not reported

Manifest DOC ID: Not reported

WI MANIFEST SHIP: -

Contact Email Address: Not reported

Contact Extention: Not reported

Contact Telephone: 0

Contact Zip: 0

Contact City: Not reported

Contact State: Not reported

Contact Address: Not reported

Contact Title: Not reported

Contact Last Name: Not reported

Contact First Name: Not reported

ACT Name: HW Generator - Small

ACT Code 1: 202

ACT Status: A

ACT Code: 202

FID: 0

EPA ID: ILR000131300

Year: 07

Waste LBS: Not reported

Unit of Measure: Not reported

Waste Amount: Not reported

Waste Code: Not reported

Waste Line No: Not reported

Waste Page No: Not reported

Manifest DOC ID: Not reported

TRAN Date: Not reported

TRAN ORDER NO: Not reported

TRAN EPA ID: Not reported

Mifest DOC ID: Not reported

WI MANIFEST TRANS: -

Waste LBS: Not reported

Unit of Measure: Not reported

Waste Amount: Not reported

Waste Code: Not reported

Waste Line No: Not reported

Waste Page No: Not reported

Manifest DOC ID: Not reported

TSG Copy Revd Date: Not reported

GEN Copy Revd Date: Not reported

TSD EPA ID: Not reported

TSD Date: Not reported

Gen Date: Not reported

Gen EPA ID: Not reported

Copy Type: Not reported

Manifest DOC ID: Not reported

WI MANIFEST SHIP: -

BP AMOCO (Continued) 1007570025

TC2800629.2s Page 122
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Waste LBS: Not reported

Unit of Measure: Not reported

Waste Amount: Not reported

Waste Code: Not reported

Waste Line No: Not reported

Waste Page No: Not reported

Manifest DOC ID: Not reported

TRAN Date: Not reported

TRAN ORDER NO: Not reported

TRAN EPA ID: Not reported

Mifest DOC ID: Not reported

WI MANIFEST TRANS: -

Waste LBS: Not reported

Unit of Measure: Not reported

Waste Amount: Not reported

Waste Code: Not reported

Waste Line No: Not reported

Waste Page No: Not reported

Manifest DOC ID: Not reported

TSG Copy Revd Date: Not reported

BP AMOCO (Continued) 1007570025

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 10000

Tank Number: 2

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 8/14/2008

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Green Tag Issue Date: 6/25/2008

Green Tag Decal: J000495

Install Date: 7/31/1998

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Currently in use

OSFM First Notify Date: 1/11/1999

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 10000

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Oconomowoc, WI 53066

Owner Address: 1185 Sandpiper Drive

Owner Id: U0034453

Owner Name: Shrigi, LLC

Facility Type: Self-Service Station

Facility Status: Active

Facility ID: 2036446

UST:

4924 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster K

0.933 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

720 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

ENE 1207 NORTH EOLA ROAD N/A

K73 BP AMOCO #14166 UST U003559111

TC2800629.2s Page 123
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 8/14/2008

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Green Tag Issue Date: 6/25/2008

Green Tag Decal: J000495

Install Date: 7/31/1998

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Currently in use

OSFM First Notify Date: 1/11/1999

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 10000

Tank Number: 3

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 8/14/2008

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Green Tag Issue Date: 6/25/2008

Green Tag Decal: J000495

Install Date: 7/31/1998

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Currently in use

OSFM First Notify Date: 1/11/1999

Last Used Date: Not reported

BP AMOCO #14166 (Continued) U003559111

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 5/7/1986

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 8000

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Long Island City, NY 11101

Owner Address: 27-11 49Th Ave

Owner Id: U0018647

Owner Name: Russ Togs

Facility Type: None

Facility Status: Closed

Facility ID: 2022345

UST:

4934 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster L

0.935 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

711 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60507

West 1601 E MOUNTAIN ST N/A

L74 R M KAUFMAN UST U000867501

TC2800629.2s Page 124
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 5/7/1986

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Diesel Fuel

Tank Capacity: 8000

Tank Number: 2

R M KAUFMAN (Continued) U000867501

License Expires: 12/31/10

Facility Contact: SANG LEE

Facility Id: 3057-5842-01

IL Drycleaners:

4960 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster K

0.939 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

721 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

ENE 1242 NORTH EOLA ROAD N/A

K75 STONEBRIDGE CLEANERS DRYCLEANERS S106541554

NFR Date Recorded: 2/11/1999

NFA/NFR Letter: 8/4/1998

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 9/17/1997

20 Report Received: 8/5/1997

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 732

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Edwardsville, IL 62025

PRP Address: 145 North Kansas

PRP Contact: Eugene Drzewiecki

PRP Name: Cassens Transport Co.

Email: Steve.Putrich@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 524-4827

Project Manager: Putrich

IEMA Date: 7/17/1997

Product: Other Petro

IL EPA Id: 0434075070

Incident Num: 971279

LUST:

5134 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster M

0.972 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

720 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

ESE 3401 LIBERTY RD. N/A

M76 CASSENS TRANSPORT CO. LUST S104521414

TC2800629.2s Page 125
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

NFR Date Recorded: 8/23/1999

NFA/NFR Letter: 8/6/1999

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 9/17/1997

20 Report Received: 2/14/1997

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 732

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Edwardsville, IL 62025

PRP Address: P.O. Box 468

PRP Contact: Brian Suhre

PRP Name: Cassens Transport Co.

Email: Steve.Putrich@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 524-4827

Project Manager: Putrich

IEMA Date: 1/23/1997

Product: Deisel

IL EPA Id: 0434075070

Incident Num: 970137

LUST:

5134 ft. Site 2 of 5 in cluster M

0.972 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

720 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

ESE 3401 LIBERTY AVE. N/A

M77 CASSENS TRANSPORT CO. LUST S104521668

Tank Number: 2

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2011

Green Tag Issue Date: 6/25/2009

Green Tag Decal: K000549

Install Date: 1/1/1982

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 3/26/1986

Last Used Date: 7/15/1997

Tank Substance: Diesel Fuel

Tank Capacity: 20000

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Edwardsville, IL 62025

Owner Address: 145 Kansas Street PO Box 468

Owner Id: U0002573

Owner Name: Cassens Transport Company

Facility Type: Commercial / Retail

Facility Status: Active

Facility ID: 2005995

UST:

5134 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster M

0.972 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

720 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

ESE 3401 LIBERTY ROAD N/A

M78 CASSENS TRANSPORT COMPANY UST U002113062

TC2800629.2s Page 126
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Green Tag Issue Date: 6/25/2009

Green Tag Decal: K000549

Install Date: 7/24/1997

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Currently in use

OSFM First Notify Date: 9/10/1997

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: New Oil

Tank Capacity: 3000

Tank Number: 5

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2011

Green Tag Issue Date: 6/25/2009

Green Tag Decal: K000549

Install Date: 7/24/1997

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Currently in use

OSFM First Notify Date: 9/10/1997

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Used Oil

Tank Capacity: 3000

Tank Number: 4

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2011

Green Tag Issue Date: 6/25/2009

Green Tag Decal: K000549

Install Date: 1/1/1982

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 3/26/1986

Last Used Date: 7/15/1997

Tank Substance: Used Oil

Tank Capacity: 1000

Tank Number: 3

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2011

Green Tag Issue Date: 6/25/2009

Green Tag Decal: K000549

Install Date: 1/1/1982

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 3/26/1986

Last Used Date: 7/15/1997

Tank Substance: New Oil

Tank Capacity: 4000

CASSENS TRANSPORT COMPANY (Continued) U002113062

TC2800629.2s Page 127
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2011

Green Tag Issue Date: 6/25/2009

Green Tag Decal: K000549

Install Date: 7/24/1997

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Currently in use

OSFM First Notify Date: 9/10/1997

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Diesel Fuel

Tank Capacity: 20000

Tank Number: 6

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2011

CASSENS TRANSPORT COMPANY (Continued) U002113062

Max Daily Range: 1,000 - 9,999

CAS Number: 64742547

Chemical Name: OIL (HYDRAULIC)

Longitude: -88.250799999999899

Latitude: 41.767090000000003

Corporate Name: Cassens Transport Company

Year: 2008

Max Daily Range: 10,000 - 99,999

CAS Number: 64741884

Chemical Name: OIL, [MOTOR]

Longitude: -88.250799999999899

Latitude: 41.767090000000003

Corporate Name: Cassens Transport Company

Year: 2008

Max Daily Range: 1,000 - 9,999

CAS Number: 64742547

Chemical Name: OIL (HYDRAULIC)

Longitude: -88.250799999999899

Latitude: 41.767090000000003

Corporate Name: Cassens Transport Company

Year: 2008

Max Daily Range: 100,000 - 999,999

CAS Number: 68476302

Chemical Name: FUEL OIL, [NO. 2]

Longitude: -88.250799999999899

Latitude: 41.767090000000003

Corporate Name: Cassens Transport Company

TIER 2:

5137 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster M

0.973 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

720 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

ESE 3401 LIBERTY ST N/A

M79 CASSENS TRANSPORT COMPANY TIER 2 S110151445

TC2800629.2s Page 128
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Year: 2009

Max Daily Range: 10,000 - 99,999

CAS Number: 64741884

Chemical Name: OIL, [MOTOR]

Longitude: -88.250799999999899

Latitude: 41.767090000000003

Corporate Name: Cassens Transport Company

Year: 2009

Max Daily Range: 100,000 - 999,999

CAS Number: 68476302

Chemical Name: FUEL OIL, [NO. 2]

Longitude: -88.250799999999899

Latitude: 41.767090000000003

Corporate Name: Cassens Transport Company

Year: 2009

CASSENS TRANSPORT COMPANY (Continued) S110151445

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110018162913

FINDS:

5137 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster M

0.973 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

720 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60504

ESE 3401 LIBERTY ST N/A

M80 CASSENS TRANSPORT CO FINDS 1008119670

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 5/8/1986

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 1000

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60505

Owner Address: 1630 E Mountain St

Owner Id: U0012139

Owner Name: Premier Electrical Const Co

Facility Type: None

Facility Status: Closed

Facility ID: 2010882

UST:

5146 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster L

0.975 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

1/2-1 AURORA, IL 60505

West 1630 E MOUNTAIN ST N/A

L81 PREMIER ELECTRICAL CONST CO UST U000176888

TC2800629.2s Page 129
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 5/8/1986

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 2000

Tank Number: 2

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

PREMIER ELECTRICAL CONST CO (Continued) U000176888

 hazardous waste

 the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely

 any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from

 time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of

 hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any

 from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely

 of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting

 land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less

 other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any

 waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or

 month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous

 or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar

 month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time;

Description: Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendar

Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (217) 785-2361

Contact country: Not reported

 Not reported

Contact address: Not reported

Contact: ENV COORDINATOR

EPA ID: ILD984822080

 AURORA, IL 60504

Facility address: 2705 STONEBRIDGE BLVD

Facility name: STONEBRIDGE COUNTRY CLUB

Date form received by agency: 11/01/2007

RCRA-CESQG:

5368 ft.

1.017 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

738 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60504 UST

North 2705 STONEBRIDGE BLVD FINDS ILD984822080

82 STONEBRIDGE COUNTRY CLUB RCRA-CESQG 1000611991

TC2800629.2s Page 130
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110005888502

FINDS:

Violation Status: No violations found

Waste name: LEAD

Waste code: D008

 WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE.

 MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT

 WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE

 FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET,

 CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE

 LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS

Waste name: IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF

Waste code: D001

Hazardous Waste Summary:

Classification: Large Quantity Generator

Facility name: STONEBRIDGE COUNTRY CLUB

Date form received by agency: 04/25/1991

Historical Generators:

Off-site waste receiver: Commercial status unknown

Used oil transporter: No

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

Used oil processor: No

Used oil fuel burner: No

Furnace exemption: No

On-site burner exemption: No

Underground injection activity: No

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: Not reported

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 Not reported

Owner/operator address: Not reported

Owner/operator name: STONEBRIDGE CTY CLUB

Owner/Operator Summary:

STONEBRIDGE COUNTRY CLUB (Continued) 1000611991

TC2800629.2s Page 131
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2001

Green Tag Issue Date: 12/9/1998

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 2/25/1991

Last Used Date: 12/22/1998

Tank Substance: Diesel Fuel

Tank Capacity: 1000

Tank Number: 2

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2001

Green Tag Issue Date: 12/9/1998

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 2/25/1991

Last Used Date: 12/22/1998

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 1000

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60504

Owner Address: 2705 Stonebridge Blvd

Owner Id: U0017887

Owner Name: Stonebridge Country Club

Facility Type: Private Institution

Facility Status: Closed

Facility ID: 2028053

UST:

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

STONEBRIDGE COUNTRY CLUB (Continued) 1000611991

IEMA Date: 5/9/1991

Product: Gasoline

IL EPA Id: 0894075795

Incident Num: 911228

LUST:

5465 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster N

1.035 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

708 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60507

West 1601 EAST MOUNTAIN ST. N/A

N83 RUSS TOGS INC. LUST S104526025

TC2800629.2s Page 132
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: Not reported

20 Report Received: Not reported

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 731

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Long Island, NY 11101

PRP Address: 27011 49th Ave.

PRP Contact: Not reported

PRP Name: MORTIMER ZIMMERMAN

Email: Not reported

Project Manager Phone: Not reported

Project Manager: NOT ASSIGNED

RUSS TOGS INC. (Continued) S104526025

 AURORA, IL 60505

Owner/operator address: 1601 E MOUNTAIN ST

Owner/operator name: LEVIN LOUIS

Owner/Operator Summary:

 hazardous waste

 the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely

 any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from

 time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of

 hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any

 from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely

 of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting

 land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less

 other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any

 waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or

 month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous

 or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar

 month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time;

Description: Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendar

Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator

Land type: Private

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (708) 898-6800

Contact country: US

 AURORA, IL 60505

Contact address: 1601 E MOUNTAIN ST

Contact: SID LEVIN

EPA ID: ILD984821322

 AURORA, IL 60505

Facility address: 1601 E MOUNTAIN ST

Facility name: SERVICE MFG CORP

Date form received by agency: 04/17/1991

RCRA-CESQG:

5465 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster N

1.035 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

708 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60504

West 1601 E MOUNTAIN ST FINDS ILD984821322

N84 SERVICE MFG CORP RCRA-CESQG 1000611918

TC2800629.2s Page 133
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110006404649

FINDS:

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Area of violation: Not reported

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE VISIT

Evaluation date: 01/08/1998

Evaluation Action Summary:

Violation Status: No violations found

 WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE.

 MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT

 WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE

 FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET,

 CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE

 LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS

Waste name: IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF

Waste code: D001

Waste name: Not Defined

Waste code: D000

Hazardous Waste Summary:

Off-site waste receiver: Verified to be non-commercial

Used oil transporter: No

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

Used oil processor: No

Used oil fuel burner: No

Furnace exemption: No

On-site burner exemption: No

Underground injection activity: No

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Unknown

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (708) 898-6800

Owner/operator country: Not reported

SERVICE MFG CORP (Continued) 1000611918

TC2800629.2s Page 134
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

SERVICE MFG CORP (Continued) 1000611918

License Expires: 12/31/10

Facility Contact: SON

Facility Id: 3368-4294-01

IL Drycleaners:

5806 ft.

1.100 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

730 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60504

NE 3150 NORTH AURORA ROAD N/A

85 AMERICAN STAR CLEANERS DRYCLEANERS S106540578

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: NAME NOT REPORTED

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 05/22/2003

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (630) 851-9444

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 AURORA, IL 60505

Owner/operator address: 601 N FARNSWORTH

Owner/operator name: J B INDUSTRIES

Owner/Operator Summary:

Description: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste

Classification: Non-Generator

Land type: Private

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (312) 851-5670

Contact country: US

 AURORA, IL 60505

Contact address: 1500 DEARBORN ST

Contact: CLIVE PECOVER

EPA ID: ILD035755719

 AURORA, IL 60505

Facility address: 1500 DEARBORN ST

Facility name: BEST BLAST CORP

Date form received by agency: 05/22/2003

RCRA-NonGen:

6023 ft.

1.141 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

701 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60505

WSW 1500 DEARBORN ST ILD035755719

86 BEST BLAST CORP RCRA-NonGen 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 135
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/23/1994

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 05/06/1994

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Regulation violated: SR - 725.271

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: Not reported

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: Not reported

 Enforcement action: Not reported

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 08/25/1994

Area of violation: TSD - Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures

Regulation violated: SR - 725.153

Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:

Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator

Facility name: BEST BLAST CORP

Date form received by agency: 11/07/1988

Historical Generators:

Off-site waste receiver: Commercial status unknown

Used oil transporter: No

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

Used oil processor: No

Used oil fuel burner: No

Furnace exemption: No

On-site burner exemption: No

Underground injection activity: No

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 01/01/0001

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 136
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 07/13/1993

Area of violation: Generators - General

Regulation violated: SR - 722.120(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 07/13/1993

Area of violation: Generators - General

Regulation violated: SR - 722.112(c)

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 05/06/1994

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.117(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/23/1994

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 05/06/1994

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.117(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 137
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Regulation violated: SR - 722.111

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Date violation determined: 04/29/1992

Area of violation: Generators - Pre-transport

Regulation violated: SR - 722.134(c)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 07/10/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Date violation determined: 04/29/1992

Area of violation: Generators - Pre-transport

Regulation violated: SR - 722.134(c)

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/08/2002

Date violation determined: 04/29/1992

Area of violation: Generators - General

Regulation violated: SR - 722.111

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/08/2002

Date violation determined: 04/29/1992

Area of violation: Generators - General

Regulation violated: SR - 722.111

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 138
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.114(a)/(b)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 703.121(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Regulation violated: SR - 725.274

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 09/08/1993

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Regulation violated: SR - 725.273(b)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 07/10/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/08/2002

Date violation determined: 04/29/1992

Area of violation: Generators - General

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 139
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.116(a)

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Preparedness and Prevention

Regulation violated: SR - 725.131

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 05/18/1994

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.116(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 05/18/1994

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.114(c)

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 140
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.114(c)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.114(a)/(b)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: LDR - General

Regulation violated: SR - 728.150(a)(1)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.175

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 141
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/01/1992

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.113(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/01/1992

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.113(a)

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.175

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 05/18/1994

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: Generators - Pre-transport

Regulation violated: SR - 722.134(d)

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

Violation lead agency: State

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 142
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures

Regulation violated: SR - 725.151(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.116(a)

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.115(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 05/18/1994

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.114(a)/(b)

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 143
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure

Regulation violated: SR - 725.212(a)

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures

Regulation violated: SR - 725.155

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures

Regulation violated: SR - 725.155

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures

Regulation violated: SR - 725.151(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 05/18/1994

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 144
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: LDR - General

Regulation violated: SR - 728.150(a)(2)

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: LDR - General

Regulation violated: SR - 728.107(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: LDR - General

Regulation violated: SR - 728.107(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 09/08/1993

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Regulation violated: SR - 725.273(b)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 145
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.114(c)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.113(b)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/01/1992

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.113(a)

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: Generators - Pre-transport

Regulation violated: SR - 722.134(d)

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 146
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure

Regulation violated: SR - 725.212(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures

Regulation violated: SR - 725.155

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: Generators - Pre-transport

Regulation violated: SR - 722.134(d)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.115(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 147
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 05/18/1994

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.113(b)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 05/18/1994

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/01/1992

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.113(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: LDR - General

Regulation violated: SR - 728.150(a)(1)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 09/08/1993

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Regulation violated: SR - 725.273(a)

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 148
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Regulation violated: SR - 725.274

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure

Regulation violated: SR - 725.212(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.173

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures

Regulation violated: SR - 725.151(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 149
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.115(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: LDR - General

Regulation violated: SR - 728.150(a)(2)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 703.121(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 05/18/1994

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 703.121(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 150
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Regulation violated: SR - 728.150(a)(1)

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Regulation violated: SR - 725.274

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 09/08/1993

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Regulation violated: SR - 725.271

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures

Regulation violated: SR - 725.151(a)

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Preparedness and Prevention

Regulation violated: SR - 725.137

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 151
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.173

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 05/18/1994

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.115(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.114(c)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: Not reported

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: Not reported

 Enforcement action: Not reported

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Preparedness and Prevention

Regulation violated: SR - 725.135

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: LDR - General

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 152
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.113(b)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: LDR - General

Regulation violated: SR - 728.150(a)(2)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: LDR - General

Regulation violated: SR - 728.107(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Financial Requirements

Regulation violated: SR - 725.242(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 153
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: Generators - Pre-transport

Regulation violated: SR - 722.134(d)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.116(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.114(a)/(b)

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.113(b)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 154
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 09/08/1993

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Regulation violated: SR - 725.271

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Financial Requirements

Regulation violated: SR - 725.242(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.175

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Regulation violated: SR - 725.173

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 155
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

 Enforcement action: FINAL CIVIL JUDICIAL ACTION FOR IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/01/1992

Date violation determined: 09/20/1990

Area of violation: Generators - General

Regulation violated: SR - 722.111

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 11/19/1990

 Enforcement action: VIOLATION NOTICE (VN)

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/01/1992

Date violation determined: 09/20/1990

Area of violation: Generators - General

Regulation violated: SR - 722.111

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: 5000

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 10/29/1993

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/01/1992

Date violation determined: 09/20/1990

Area of violation: Generators - General

Regulation violated: SR - 722.111

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 09/08/1993

Date violation determined: 02/04/1992

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Regulation violated: SR - 725.273(a)

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 03/30/1992

 Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 156
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: Generators - Pre-transport

Evaluation: SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIER

Evaluation date: 02/26/1999

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Area of violation: Not reported

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 04/08/2002

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Area of violation: Not reported

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE EVALUATION

Evaluation date: 04/08/2002

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Area of violation: Not reported

Evaluation: FOCUSED COMPLIANCE INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 03/02/2004

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Area of violation: Not reported

Evaluation: NOT A SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIER

Evaluation date: 04/09/2004

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Area of violation: Not reported

Evaluation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW

Evaluation date: 03/25/2005

Evaluation Action Summary:

 Paid penalty amount: Not reported

 Final penalty amount: Not reported

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 05/18/1994

 Enforcement action: REFERRAL TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Violation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/01/1992

Date violation determined: 09/20/1990

Area of violation: Generators - General

Regulation violated: SR - 722.111

 Paid penalty amount: 3234

 Final penalty amount: 23000

 Proposed penalty amount: Not reported

 Enforcement lead agency: State

 Enf. disp. status date: Not reported

 Enf. disposition status: Not reported

 Enforcement action date: 06/06/1996

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 157
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Evaluation date: 02/26/1999

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/08/2002

Area of violation: Generators - General

Evaluation: SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIER

Evaluation date: 02/26/1999

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Evaluation: SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIER

Evaluation date: 02/26/1999

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: TSD - Preparedness and Prevention

Evaluation: SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIER

Evaluation date: 02/26/1999

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: LDR - General

Evaluation: SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIER

Evaluation date: 02/26/1999

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure

Evaluation: SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIER

Evaluation date: 02/26/1999

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures

Evaluation: SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIER

Evaluation date: 02/26/1999

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/01/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Evaluation: SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIER

Evaluation date: 02/26/1999

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/01/1992

Area of violation: Generators - General

Evaluation: SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIER

Evaluation date: 02/26/1999

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Evaluation: SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIER

Evaluation date: 02/26/1999

Evaluation lead agency: State

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 158
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 04/09/1997

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/09/1997

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 04/09/1997

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Area of violation: Not reported

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/09/1997

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - Financial Requirements

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 04/09/1997

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - Financial Requirements

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/09/1997

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: LDR - General

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 04/09/1997

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: Generators - General

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 04/09/1997

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/09/1997

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: LDR - General

Evaluation: SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIER

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 159
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Evaluation date: 04/09/1997

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/08/2002

Area of violation: Generators - General

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/09/1997

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: LDR - General

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/09/1997

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/08/2002

Area of violation: Generators - General

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 04/09/1997

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 04/09/1997

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 04/09/1997

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/09/1997

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: Generators - General

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/09/1997

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/09/1997

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/09/1997

Evaluation lead agency: State

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 160
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: Generators - General

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: TSD - Preparedness and Prevention

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - Financial Requirements

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: LDR - General

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: LDR - General

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures

Evaluation: CASE DEVELOPMENT INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 08/25/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 161
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: Generators - General

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/08/2002

Area of violation: Generators - General

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - Financial Requirements

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: TSD - Preparedness and Prevention

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 162
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - Financial Requirements

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Area of violation: Not reported

Evaluation: FOCUSED COMPLIANCE INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 08/27/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: LDR - General

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: LDR - General

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: Generators - Pre-transport

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: Generators - Pre-transport

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/08/2002

Area of violation: Generators - General

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 05/06/1994

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 163
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: LDR - General

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: LDR - General

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/08/2002

Area of violation: Generators - General

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/08/2002

Area of violation: Generators - General

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: Generators - General

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: LDR - General

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 164
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - Financial Requirements

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: TSD - Preparedness and Prevention

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: Generators - Pre-transport

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: Generators - Pre-transport

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: LDR - General

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 165
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Evaluation date: 04/29/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/29/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: LDR - General

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/29/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/29/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/29/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: LDR - General

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/29/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - Financial Requirements

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/29/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: Generators - General

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: TSD - Preparedness and Prevention

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 07/13/1993

Evaluation lead agency: State

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 166
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - Financial Requirements

Evaluation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW

Evaluation date: 02/04/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: Generators - Pre-transport

Evaluation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW

Evaluation date: 02/04/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Evaluation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW

Evaluation date: 02/04/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/01/1992

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Evaluation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW

Evaluation date: 02/04/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/08/2002

Area of violation: Generators - General

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/29/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: TSD - Preparedness and Prevention

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/29/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: Generators - Pre-transport

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/29/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/29/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

Evaluation date: 04/29/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 09/08/1993

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Evaluation: FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 167
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/01/1992

Area of violation: Generators - General

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE

Evaluation date: 09/20/1990

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 09/08/1993

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Evaluation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW

Evaluation date: 02/04/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: LDR - General

Evaluation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW

Evaluation date: 02/04/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/2004

Area of violation: TSD - Closure/Post-Closure

Evaluation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW

Evaluation date: 02/04/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/21/1999

Area of violation: TSD - Preparedness and Prevention

Evaluation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW

Evaluation date: 02/04/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: LDR - General

Evaluation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW

Evaluation date: 02/04/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - Container Use and Management

Evaluation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW

Evaluation date: 02/04/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - General Facility Standards

Evaluation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW

Evaluation date: 02/04/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: 04/09/1997

Area of violation: TSD - Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures

Evaluation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW

Evaluation date: 02/04/1992

Evaluation lead agency: State

BEST BLAST CORP (Continued) 1007092684

TC2800629.2s Page 168
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

NFR Date Recorded: 11/19/1998

NFA/NFR Letter: 7/13/1998

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 10/29/1992

20 Report Received: 7/23/1992

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 732

Site Classification: LOW

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Naperville, IL 60523

PRP Address: P.O. Box 3990

PRP Contact: Paulette Jurgoven

PRP Name: Indian Prairie School Dist. #204

Email: Robert.Harlow@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 524-7650

Project Manager: Harlow

IEMA Date: 6/1/1992

Product: Fuel Oil, Non Petro

IL EPA Id: 0434075019

Incident Num: 921459

LUST:

6178 ft.

1.170 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

732 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60504

NNE 5 SOUTH 700 EOLA RD. N/A

87 INDIAN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DIST. #204 LUST S104002986

License Expires: 12/31/10

Facility Contact: JESSICA BERTHEL

Facility Id: 3437-7093-01

IL Drycleaners:

6188 ft.

1.172 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60504

SE 2849 EAST NEW YORK STREET N/A

88 NEW CLEANERS DRYCLEANERS S106541249

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Naperville, IL 60540

PRP Address: 30W026 Ogden Ave.

PRP Contact: Paul Woodburn

PRP Name: Indian Prairie School Dist.

Email: Sam.Hale@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 782-1803

Project Manager: Hale

IEMA Date: 9/26/1990

Product: Gasoline

IL EPA Id: 0438990001

Incident Num: 902790

LUST:

6197 ft.

1.174 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

727 ft.

> 1 EOLA, IL 60519

NE EOLA RD. N/A

89 INDIAN PRAIRIE DIST. SCHOOL LUST S104190323

TC2800629.2s Page 169
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: 1/30/2008

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: Not reported

20 Report Received: Not reported

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 731

Site Classification: Not reported

INDIAN PRAIRIE DIST. SCHOOL (Continued) S104190323

Quarter Section2: Not reported

Quarter Section1: Not reported

Section: 34

Unknown: Not reported

Range: 08E

Other: Not reported

Township: 38N

Special: Not reported

Primemer ID: 3

Oil Field: Not reported

Landscaping: Not reported

Lat/Long: 414405/881831

Demolition: X

Radiation: Not reported

Hazardous Liquid: Not reported

Hazardous: Not reported

Slag: Not reported

Incinerator Ash: Not reported

Foundry Sand: Not reported

PO Box: Not reported

Industrial: Not reported

Operator: JOHN HARTMAN

Pathological: Not reported

Owner Name: JOHN HARTMAN

Animal: Not reported

NIPC Map Number: 321

Septic: Not reported

Provisional IEPA ID: Not reported

Municipal Waste: Not reported

IEPA ID Number: 890050010

General: Not reported

Region: WMRC

IL WMRC_LF:

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110018203745

FINDS:

6326 ft.

1.198 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

726 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60505

SW 235 OAKVIEW SWF/LF N/A

90 HARTMAN, JOHN FINDS 1008123731

TC2800629.2s Page 170
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Land Application: Not reported

Survace Impoundment: Not reported

Other: Not reported

Incineration: Not reported

None: Not reported

Landfill: X

Combination: Not reported

Secured Containers: Not reported

In-situ Clay: Not reported

Recompacted Clay: Not reported

Other: Not reported

Abandonment: Not reported

Leachate Collected: Not reported

Open Dump: Not reported

Size Fill: 2

Random Dump: Not reported

Landfill Size: 2

Offsite Waste: Not reported

FD Site: Not reported

Date Cleaned: Not reported

GW Monitoring: NO

Date Discover: Not reported

RCRA Facility: Not reported

Reaction: Not reported

Close Date: 111679

Source Other: Not reported

IEPA Permit Date: 10175

Agency: NIPC

Permit Status: UNPERMITTED UNAUTHORIZED

Local Agency: Not reported

Operational Status: CLOSED FINAL COVER

DPH: Not reported

IDM&M: Not reported

PollutionControlBoard: Not reported

ISGS: Not reported

IEPA: X

Quarter Section4: Not reported

Quarter Section3: Not reported

HARTMAN, JOHN (Continued) 1008123731

Last Used Date: 12/22/1998

Tank Substance: Diesel Fuel

Tank Capacity: 6000

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60505

Owner Address: 712 N. Farnsworth

Owner Id: U0012559

Owner Name: Reed Machinery & Transportation Co.

Facility Type: Industrial / Manufacturing

Facility Status: Closed

Facility ID: 2018949

UST:

6418 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster O

1.215 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

702 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60505

West 712 N FARNSWORTH N/A

O91 REED MACHINERY & TRANSPORTATION CO. UST U001144784

TC2800629.2s Page 171
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 4/7/1986

Last Used Date: 12/22/1998

Tank Substance: Diesel Fuel

Tank Capacity: 6000

Tank Number: 2

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 4/7/1986

REED MACHINERY & TRANSPORTATION CO. (Continued) U001144784

NFR Date Recorded: 12/27/2001

NFA/NFR Letter: 5/30/2001

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 4/14/2000

20 Report Received: 3/24/2000

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 732

Site Classification: NFA

PRP Phone: 6308515656

PRP City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60505

PRP Address: 712 North Farnsworth Ave.

PRP Contact: Steve Thompson

PRP Name: Reed Machinery & Transportation

Email: Robin.McCain@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 785-6309

Project Manager: McCain

IEMA Date: 3/15/2000

Product: Deisel

IL EPA Id: 0894076028

Incident Num: 20000451

LUST:

6418 ft. Site 2 of 5 in cluster O

1.215 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

702 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60505

West 712 NORTH FARNSWORTH AVE. N/A

O92 REED MACHINERY & TRANSPORTATION LUST S104530519

TC2800629.2s Page 172
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2011

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 9/30/2009

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2011

Green Tag Issue Date: 7/24/2009

Green Tag Decal: K000590

Install Date: 10/3/1996

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Currently in use

OSFM First Notify Date: 1/20/1997

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 15000

Tank Number: 2

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2011

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 9/30/2009

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2011

Green Tag Issue Date: 7/24/2009

Green Tag Decal: K000590

Install Date: 10/6/1996

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Currently in use

OSFM First Notify Date: 1/20/1997

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 15000

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Columbus, IN 47201

Owner Address: 4080 West Jonathan Moore Pike

Owner Id: U0035671

Owner Name: RDK Ventures, LLC

Facility Type: Self-Service Station

Facility Status: Active

Facility ID: 2034801

UST:

6419 ft.

1.216 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

711 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60507

SE 2946 A EAST NEW YORK STREET N/A

93 CIRCLE K #6762 UST U003104788

Email: Not reported

Project Manager Phone: Not reported

Project Manager: Kohrmann

IEMA Date: 9/21/1990

Product: Deisel

IL EPA Id: 0894075118

Incident Num: 902727

LUST:

6500 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster O

1.231 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

699 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60507

West 705 NORTH FARNSWORTH AVE. N/A

O94 AURORA PAPERBOARD DIV., DAVEY CO. LUST S104526664

TC2800629.2s Page 173
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: 4/4/1991

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 2/29/1992

20 Report Received: 2/29/1992

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 731

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60507

PRP Address: P.O. Box 1120

PRP Contact: Jacob Peter

PRP Name: Aurora Paperboard

AURORA PAPERBOARD DIV., DAVEY CO. (Continued) S104526664

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Unknown

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: Not reported

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 Not reported

Owner/operator address: Not reported

Owner/operator name: DODD JOHN

Owner/Operator Summary:

 hazardous waste at any time

 waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of

 hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous

 waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of

Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous

Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (630) 898-4231

Contact country: US

 AURORA, IL 60505

Contact address: 705 FARNSWORTH

Contact: STEPHAN STARZYK

EPA ID: ILD984825505

 AURORA, IL 60505

Facility address: 705 FARNSWORTH

Facility name: ROCK TENN

Date form received by agency: 11/04/1997

RCRA-SQG:

6500 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster O

1.231 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

699 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60505 AIRS

West 705 N FARNSWORTH FINDS ILD984825505

O95 ROCK-TENN CO RCRA-SQG 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 174
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

The NEI (National Emissions Inventory) database contains information

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

of the Clean Air Act.

redesign to support facility operating permits required under Title V

estimation of total national emissions. AFS is undergoing a major

to comply with regulatory programs and by EPA as an input for the

AFS data are utilized by states to prepare State Implementation Plans

used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants.

information concerning airborne pollution in the United States. AFS is

Aerometric Data (SAROAD). AIRS is the national repository for

National Emission Data System (NEDS), and the Storage and Retrieval of

Subsystem) replaces the former Compliance Data System (CDS), the

AFS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Facility

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110001814485

FINDS:

Violation Status: No violations found

Waste name: TRICHLOROETHYLENE

Waste code: D040

Waste name: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE

Waste code: D039

Waste name: BENZENE

Waste code: D018

Waste name: LEAD

Waste code: D008

 WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE.

 MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT

 WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE

 FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET,

 CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE

 LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS

Waste name: IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF

Waste code: D001

Hazardous Waste Summary:

Off-site waste receiver: Verified to be non-commercial

Used oil transporter: No

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

Used oil processor: No

Used oil fuel burner: No

Furnace exemption: No

On-site burner exemption: No

Underground injection activity: No

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 175
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: .299520

Pollutant Code: N2O

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Emissions:

Year: 2006

Address Type Code: LOC

SIC Code: 2631

Cease Operation Date: Not reported

ID Number: 089800AAT

Lat/Long: 41.770030 / -88.281200

Contact Fax: 630-898-5783

Contact EMail: charbit@rocktenn.com

Contact Extention: 2477

Contact Tele: 630-898-4231

Contact Title: Not reported

Contact Name: Charles P Harbit

Facility Address 2: Not reported

Facility ID: 6001

IL AIRS:

permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES facilities.

Elimination System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the

information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge

PCS (Permit Compliance System) is a computerized management

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

discharge does not adversely affect water quality.

requirements, and include other provisions to ensure that the

limits on what can be discharged, impose monitoring and reporting

States are required to obtain a permit. The permit will likely contain

discharge pollutants from any point source into waters of the United

issued under the Clean Water Act. Under NPDES, all facilities that

the Compliance Information System (ICIS) tracks surface water permits

US National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) module of

transported off-site.

these facilities release directly to air, water, land, or that are

from facilities on the amounts of over 300 listed toxic chemicals that

US EPA TRIS (Toxics Release Inventory System) contains information

their precursors, as well as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs).

on stationary and mobile sources that emit criteria air pollutants and

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 176
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.138176

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: .344448

Pollutant Code: METHANE

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 5.090000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.138176

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 8.830000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 7.420000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: .089856

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 177
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM2.5

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 17.99362

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 26.27520

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 25891.200000

Pollutant Code: CO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: .709632

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.138176

Pollutant Code: PM2.5

Id Num: Not reported

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 178
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 7.22

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.138176

Pollutant Code: PM2.5

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.138176

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.709632

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.138176

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 4.05

Pollutant Code: VOM

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 179
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Tons per Year: 0.70963

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM2.5

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.70963

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 8.6

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 22

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.089856

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 180
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.70963

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 03/28/06

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 8.34000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 17.99362

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 26.27520

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 22

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 181
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 03/28/06

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 7

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 03/28/06

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM2.5

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 03/28/06

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 03/28/06

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 4.71000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 03/28/06

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 03/28/06

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 03/28/06

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 182
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 03/21/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 9.73000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 26.27520

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.70963

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM2.5

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 22

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 183
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 03/21/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 03/21/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM2.5

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 03/21/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 03/21/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 03/21/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.43000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 03/21/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.70963

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 03/21/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 8.17000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 184
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 09/12/03

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 17.99362

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 09/12/03

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 26.27520

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 09/12/03

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 09/12/03

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 22

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 09/12/03

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 09/12/03

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 17.99362

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 185
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/03/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2.21000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/03/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.70963

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/03/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 7.98000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/03/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/03/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/03/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 9.50000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 09/12/03

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.70963

Pollutant Code: NH3

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 186
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Tons per Year: 26.27600

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 11/19/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 22

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 11/19/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 11/19/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 11/19/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 18

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 11/19/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.70963

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 06/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 06/03/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.13818

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 187
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 06/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 06/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 7.96000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 06/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 06/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 9.48000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 06/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.94000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 06/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.70963

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 11/19/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 188
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated Date: 07/08/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2.22000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 07/08/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 13.84000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 07/08/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 3.75000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 58.75642

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 38.59200

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 20.55167

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 11/19/02

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 189
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 58.75642

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.41000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 20.55167

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 15

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 3.97000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 07/08/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 190
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 03/07/00

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 15.71000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 03/07/00

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2.66000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 03/07/00

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.21300

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 03/07/00

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 38.59200

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 191
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 44.54800

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 21.27510

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 69.41170

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 58.75642

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 03/07/00

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 4.31000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 20.55167

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 38.59200

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 192
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 44.54800

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 3.40000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.21300

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.40000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 12.43000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1

Pollutant Code: PART

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 193
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Tons per Year: 21.27510

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.43280

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 6.49270

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 69.41170

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 16.84260

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.36190

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 194
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 44.54800

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 13

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 5

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.10800

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 195
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 5.87000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 18.54000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 69.41170

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 14.90660

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 69.41170

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 196
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 20.80000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 204

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 84

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.68000

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 30

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 14.90660

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 44.54800

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1995

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 197
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 4.10400

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 84

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 25.83360

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 4.10400

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 29.80000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 7.24000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 198
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 4.10400

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 204

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 9.13000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 26.30000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 25.83360

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 38.70000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 199
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Contact Title: Not reported

Contact Name: Charles P Harbit

Facility Address 2: Not reported

Facility ID: 6001

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 4.10400

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 204

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 25.83360

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 84

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 4

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 3.44000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 8.28000

Pollutant Code: VOM

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 200
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Tons per Year: 5.090000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.138176

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 8.830000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 7.420000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: .089856

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: .299520

Pollutant Code: N2O

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Emissions:

Year: 2007

Address Type Code: Not reported

SIC Code: 2631

Cease Operation Date: Not reported

ID Number: 089800AAT

Lat/Long: Not reported

Contact Fax: Not reported

Contact EMail: Not reported

Contact Extention: Not reported

Contact Tele: 630-898-4231

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 201
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 26.27520

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 25891.200000

Pollutant Code: CO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: .709632

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.138176

Pollutant Code: PM2.5

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.138176

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: .344448

Pollutant Code: METHANE

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2007

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 202
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.138176

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.709632

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.138176

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 4.05

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM2.5

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 17.99362

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 203
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.70963

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 8.6

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 22

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.089856

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 7.22

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

Last Updated Date: Not reported

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.138176

Pollutant Code: PM2.5

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2006

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 204
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 17.99362

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 26.27520

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 22

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.70963

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM2.5

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 205
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 03/28/06

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 03/28/06

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 4.71000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 03/28/06

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 03/28/06

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 03/28/06

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.70963

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 03/28/06

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 8.34000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 206
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM2.5

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 22

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 03/28/06

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 7

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2005

Last Updated Date: 03/28/06

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM2.5

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 207
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 03/21/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 03/21/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.43000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 03/21/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.70963

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 03/21/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 8.17000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 03/21/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 9.73000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 26.27520

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.70963

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 208
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 09/12/03

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 22

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 09/12/03

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 09/12/03

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 10/15/04

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 17.99362

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 03/21/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 03/21/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM2.5

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2004

Last Updated Date: 03/21/05

Last Updated By: EPA2499

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 209
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated Date: 06/03/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 7.98000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/03/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/03/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/03/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 9.50000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 09/12/03

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.70963

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 09/12/03

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 17.99362

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 09/12/03

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 26.27520

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 09/12/03

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 210
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 11/19/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 11/19/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 18

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 11/19/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0.70963

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 06/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 06/03/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PM10

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/03/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2.21000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

Last Updated Date: 06/03/04

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.70963

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2003

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 211
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 06/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 06/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 9.48000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 06/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.94000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 06/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.70963

Pollutant Code: NH3

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 11/19/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 26.27600

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 11/19/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 22

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 11/19/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 212
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 58.75642

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 38.59200

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 20.55167

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 11/19/02

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 06/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 1.13818

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2002

Last Updated Date: 06/02/03

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 7.96000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 213
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 20.55167

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 15

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 3.97000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 07/08/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 07/08/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2.22000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 07/08/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 13.84000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2001

Last Updated Date: 07/08/02

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 3.75000

Pollutant Code: CO

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 214
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Tons per Year: 1.21300

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 03/07/00

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 38.59200

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 58.75642

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 2000

Last Updated Date: 05/22/01

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 0.41000

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 215
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 69.41170

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 58.75642

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 03/07/00

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 4.31000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 20.55167

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 09/24/99

Last Updated By: EPA2110

Tons per Year: 38.59200

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 03/07/00

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 15.71000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 03/07/00

Last Updated By: EPA2499

Tons per Year: 2.66000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1999

Last Updated Date: 03/07/00

Last Updated By: EPA2499

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 216
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.21300

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.40000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 12.43000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 44.54800

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 21.27510

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1998

Last Updated Date: / /

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 217
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 6.49270

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 69.41170

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 16.84260

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.36190

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 44.54800

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 3.40000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1998

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 218
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 5

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.10800

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 21.27510

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1997

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1.43280

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 219
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 18.54000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 69.41170

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 14.90660

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 69.41170

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 44.54800

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1996

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 13

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 220
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0.68000

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 30

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 14.90660

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 44.54800

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 1

Pollutant Code: PART

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 5.87000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1995

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 221
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Tons per Year: 25.83360

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 4.10400

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 29.80000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 7.24000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 20.80000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 204

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1994

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 84

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 222
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 9.13000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 0

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 26.30000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 25.83360

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 38.70000

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 4.10400

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 84

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 223
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 25.83360

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 84

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 4

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 3.44000

Pollutant Code: CO

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 8.28000

Pollutant Code: VOM

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 4.10400

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: Facility Reported

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 204

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1993

Last Updated Date: / /

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

TC2800629.2s Page 224
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 4.10400

Pollutant Code: SO2

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1992

Last Updated Date: / /

Last Updated By: Not reported

Tons per Year: 204

Pollutant Code: NOX

Id Num: Not reported

Emissions Type: IEPA Estimated Emissions (tons per year)

Year: 1992

ROCK-TENN CO (Continued) 1000612323

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 5/8/1986

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Diesel Fuel

Tank Capacity: 15000

Tank Number: 2

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 5/8/1986

Last Used Date: 6/1/1990

Tank Substance: Diesel Fuel

Tank Capacity: 7500

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60507

Owner Address: 705 N Farnsworth Ave

Owner Id: U0000979

Owner Name: Aurora Paperboard Div Davey Co

Facility Type: None

Facility Status: Closed

Facility ID: 2019893

UST:

6500 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster O

1.231 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

699 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60507

West 705 N FARNSWORTH AVE N/A

O96 AURORA PAPERBOARD DIV DAVEY CO UST U002113037

TC2800629.2s Page 225
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 5/8/1986

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Diesel Fuel

Tank Capacity: 15000

Tank Number: 3

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

AURORA PAPERBOARD DIV DAVEY CO (Continued) U002113037

 hazardous waste

 the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely

 any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from

 time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of

 hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any

 from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely

 of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting

 land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less

 other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any

 waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or

 month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous

 or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar

 month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time;

Description: Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendar

Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: CABESSE@SSALLC.COM

Contact telephone: (937) 863-6272

Contact country: US

 AURORA, IL 60505

Contact address: 948 N FARNSWORTH RD

Contact: CHARLES A BESSE

 SPRINGFIELD, OH 45501

Mailing address: PO BOX 1500

EPA ID: ILD984783142

 AURORA, IL 60505

Facility address: 948 N FARNSWORTH RD

Facility name: SPEEDWAY 7540

Date form received by agency: 02/28/2007

RCRA-CESQG:

6559 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster P

1.242 mi. TIER 2

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

703 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60505 LUST

WNW 948 N FARNSWORTH RD FINDS ILD984783142

P97 SPEEDWAY 7540 RCRA-CESQG 1000326039

TC2800629.2s Page 226
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

 WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE.

 MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT

 WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE

 FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET,

 CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE

 LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS

Waste name: IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF

Waste code: D001

Hazardous Waste Summary:

Classification: Small Quantity Generator

Site name: EMRO MARKETING NO 7540

Facility name: SPEEDWAY 7540

Date form received by agency: 04/09/1990

Historical Generators:

Off-site waste receiver: Verified to be non-commercial

Used oil transporter: No

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

Used oil processor: No

Used oil fuel burner: No

Furnace exemption: No

On-site burner exemption: No

Underground injection activity: No

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 01/01/1998

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: Not reported

Owner/operator country: US

 SPRINGFIELD, OH 45501

Owner/operator address: PO BOX 1500

Owner/operator name: SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 01/01/1998

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: Not reported

Owner/operator country: US

 SPRINGFIELD, OH 45501

Owner/operator address: PO BOX 1500

Owner/operator name: SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC

Owner/Operator Summary:

SPEEDWAY 7540 (Continued) 1000326039

TC2800629.2s Page 227
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

45 Report Received: 12/5/1996

20 Report Received: 4/15/1992

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 731

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: East Hazel Crest, IL 60429-0162

PRP Address: P.O. Box 162

PRP Contact: R.G. Schumann

PRP Name: Emro Marketing

Email: Steve.Putrich@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 524-4827

Project Manager: Putrich

IEMA Date: 3/31/1992

Product: Gasoline

IL EPA Id: 0894075147

Incident Num: 920832

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: Not reported

20 Report Received: Not reported

Non LUST Determination Letter: 2/14/1997

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 731

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: East Hazel Crest, IL 60429-0162

PRP Address: P.O. Box 162

PRP Contact: R.G. Schumann

PRP Name: Emro Marketing

Email: Steve.Putrich@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 524-4827

Project Manager: Putrich

IEMA Date: 2/15/1991

Product: Gasoline

IL EPA Id: 0894075147

Incident Num: 910388

LUST:

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110005872573

FINDS:

Violation Status: No violations found

Waste name: BENZENE

Waste code: D018

SPEEDWAY 7540 (Continued) 1000326039

TC2800629.2s Page 228
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Year: 2008

Max Daily Range: 10,000 - 99,999

CAS Number: 68476302

Chemical Name: DIESEL

Longitude: -88.281903999999898

Latitude: 41.776462000000002

Corporate Name: Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC

Year: 2008

Max Daily Range: 100,000 - 999,999

CAS Number: 86290815

Chemical Name: GASOLINE

Longitude: -88.281903999999898

Latitude: 41.776462000000002

Corporate Name: Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC

TIER 2:

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: Not reported

20 Report Received: Not reported

Non LUST Determination Letter: 6/25/1996

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 732

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: East Hazel Crest, IL 60429-0162

PRP Address: P.O. Box 162

PRP Contact: R.G. Schumann

PRP Name: Emro Marketing

Email: Steve.Putrich@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 524-4827

Project Manager: Putrich

IEMA Date: 5/10/1996

Product: Deisel

IL EPA Id: 0894075147

Incident Num: 960794

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

SPEEDWAY 7540 (Continued) 1000326039

PRP Name: Speedway SuperAmerica

Email: Not reported

Project Manager Phone: Not reported

Project Manager: NOT ASSIGNED

IEMA Date: 10/13/2000

Product: Gasoline

IL EPA Id: 0894075147

Incident Num: 20001961

LUST:

6559 ft. Site 2 of 5 in cluster P

1.242 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

703 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60505

WNW 948 NORTH FARNSWORTH RD. N/A

P98 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LUST S104530273

TC2800629.2s Page 229
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

IL EPA Id: 0894075147

Incident Num: 992822

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 5/4/1998

20 Report Received: 3/25/1998

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 732

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: 9378643000

PRP City,St,Zip: Springfield, OH 45501

PRP Address: Post Office Box 1500

PRP Contact: Dan Strubel

PRP Name: Speedway SuperAmerica

Email: Steve.Putrich@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 524-4827

Project Manager: Putrich

IEMA Date: 3/20/1998

Product: Unleaded Gas

IL EPA Id: 0894075147

Incident Num: 980611

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: Not reported

20 Report Received: Not reported

Non LUST Determination Letter: 2/14/2002

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 732

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: 9378637722

PRP City,St,Zip: Springfield, OH 45501

PRP Address: P.O. Box 1500

PRP Contact: Janice Campbell

PRP Name: Speedway SuperAmerica

Email: Steve.Putrich@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 524-4827

Project Manager: Putrich

IEMA Date: 12/13/2001

Product: Gasoline

IL EPA Id: 0894075147

Incident Num: 20012042

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: Not reported

20 Report Received: Not reported

Non LUST Determination Letter: 12/1/2000

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 732

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: 9378643000

PRP City,St,Zip: Enon, OH 45323

PRP Address: 600 Speedway Dr.

PRP Contact: Melissa Frazer

SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (Continued) S104530273

TC2800629.2s Page 230
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: Not reported

20 Report Received: Not reported

Non LUST Determination Letter: 6/2/2000

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 732

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: 9378643000

PRP City,St,Zip: Springfield, OH 45501

PRP Address: Post Office Box 1500

PRP Contact: Dan Strubel

PRP Name: Speedway SuperAmerica

Email: Valerie.A.Davis@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 785-7492

Project Manager: Davis

IEMA Date: 12/23/1999

Product: Gasoline, Deisel

SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (Continued) S104530273

Install Date: Not reported

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Exempt from registration

OSFM First Notify Date: 4/18/1986

Last Used Date: 1/1/1974

Tank Substance: Not reported

Tank Capacity: 550

Tank Number: 10

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 8/22/2008

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Green Tag Issue Date: 7/31/2008

Green Tag Decal: J000540

Install Date: 7/1/1992

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Currently in use

OSFM First Notify Date: 6/8/1993

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 10000

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Springfield, OH 455011500

Owner Address: P.O. Box 1500

Owner Id: U0026552

Owner Name: Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC

Facility Type: Self-Service Station

Facility Status: Active

Facility ID: 2014573

UST:

6559 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster P

1.242 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

703 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60504

WNW 948 NORTH FARNSWORTH ROAD N/A

P99 SPEEDWAY 7540 UST U004128090

TC2800629.2s Page 231
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Tank Number: 5

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 8/22/2008

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Green Tag Issue Date: 7/31/2008

Green Tag Decal: J000540

Install Date: 7/1/1992

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Currently in use

OSFM First Notify Date: 6/8/1993

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Diesel Fuel

Tank Capacity: 10000

Tank Number: 4

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 8/22/2008

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Green Tag Issue Date: 7/31/2008

Green Tag Decal: J000540

Install Date: 7/1/1992

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Currently in use

OSFM First Notify Date: 6/8/1993

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 12000

Tank Number: 3

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 8/22/2008

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Green Tag Issue Date: 7/31/2008

Green Tag Decal: J000540

Install Date: 7/1/1992

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Currently in use

OSFM First Notify Date: 6/8/1993

Last Used Date: Not reported

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 10000

Tank Number: 2

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 8/22/2008

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Green Tag Issue Date: 7/31/2008

Green Tag Decal: J000540

SPEEDWAY 7540 (Continued) U004128090

TC2800629.2s Page 232
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Green Tag Issue Date: 7/31/2008

Green Tag Decal: J000540

Install Date: 1/1/1979

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 3/13/1987

Last Used Date: 6/1/1992

Tank Substance: Diesel Fuel

Tank Capacity: 4000

Tank Number: 8

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 8/22/2008

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Green Tag Issue Date: 7/31/2008

Green Tag Decal: J000540

Install Date: 1/1/1969

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 3/13/1987

Last Used Date: 6/1/1992

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 8000

Tank Number: 7

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 8/22/2008

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Green Tag Issue Date: 7/31/2008

Green Tag Decal: J000540

Install Date: 1/1/1969

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 3/13/1987

Last Used Date: 6/1/1992

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 6000

Tank Number: 6

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 8/22/2008

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Green Tag Issue Date: 7/31/2008

Green Tag Decal: J000540

Install Date: 1/1/1969

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 3/13/1987

Last Used Date: 6/1/1992

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 6000

SPEEDWAY 7540 (Continued) U004128090

TC2800629.2s Page 233
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 8/22/2008

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Green Tag Issue Date: 7/31/2008

Green Tag Decal: J000540

Install Date: 1/1/1979

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 3/13/1987

Last Used Date: 6/1/1992

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 10000

Tank Number: 9

Fee Due: No

Self Service Permit Expire Date: 12/31/2010

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: 8/22/2008

Green Tag Expire Date: 12/31/2010

SPEEDWAY 7540 (Continued) U004128090

 hazardous waste

 the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely

 any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from

 time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of

 hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any

 from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely

 of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting

 land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less

 other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any

 waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or

 month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous

 or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar

 month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time;

Description: Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendar

Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator

Land type: Private

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (708) 851-5757

Contact country: US

 AURORA, IL 60505

Contact address: 950 N FARNSWORTH AVE

Contact: VICTOR GONZALES

EPA ID: ILD981192560

 AURORA, IL 60606

Facility address: 950 N FARNSWORTH AVE

Facility name: VILLAGE MART ONE HOUR CLEANERS

Date form received by agency: 05/13/1998

RCRA-CESQG:

6562 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster P

1.243 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

703 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60505

WNW 950 N FARNSWORTH AVE FINDS ILD981192560

P100 VILLAGE MART ONE HOUR CLEANERS RCRA-CESQG 1000276249

TC2800629.2s Page 234
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

Used oil processor: No

Used oil fuel burner: No

Furnace exemption: Unknown

On-site burner exemption: Unknown

Underground injection activity: No

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Unknown

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: Unknown

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 01/01/0001

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: NAME NOT REPORTED

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: NAME NOT REPORTED

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: 01/01/0001

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (708) 851-5757

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 AURORA, IL 60506

Owner/operator address: 950 N FRANSWORTH

Owner/operator name: GONZALES VICTOR

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (708) 851-5757

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 AURORA, IL 60506

Owner/operator address: 950 N FRANSWORTH

Owner/operator name: GONZALES VICTOR

Owner/Operator Summary:

VILLAGE MART ONE HOUR CLEANERS (Continued) 1000276249

TC2800629.2s Page 235
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

FINDS:

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Area of violation: Not reported

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE VISIT

Evaluation date: 02/03/1998

Evaluation lead agency: State

Date achieved compliance: Not reported

Area of violation: Not reported

Evaluation: COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE VISIT

Evaluation date: 05/13/1998

Evaluation Action Summary:

Violation Status: No violations found

 SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES.

 F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND

 OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE LISTED IN F001, F004, OR

 BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE

 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING,

 ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND

 CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE,

 METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE,

Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,

Waste code: F002

Waste name: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE

Waste code: D039

Waste name: Not Defined

Waste code: D000

 SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES.

 F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND

 OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE LISTED IN F001, F004, OR

 BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE

 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING,

 ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND

 CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE,

 METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE,

Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,

Waste code: F002

Waste name: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE

Waste code: D039

Hazardous Waste Summary:

Classification: Small Quantity Generator

Facility name: VILLAGE MART ONE HOUR CLEANERS

Date form received by agency: 11/19/1996

Historical Generators:

Off-site waste receiver: Commercial status unknown

Used oil transporter: No

VILLAGE MART ONE HOUR CLEANERS (Continued) 1000276249

TC2800629.2s Page 236
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110007534846

VILLAGE MART ONE HOUR CLEANERS (Continued) 1000276249

NFR Recorded: 5/17/2001

Sec. 4 Letter Date: Not reported

Proj Mgr Assigned: Mergen

Consultant Phone: (847) 228-0707

Consultant City,St,Zip: Rolling Meadows, IL 60008-

Consultant Address2: Suite 1000

Consultant Address: 1707 Golf Road

Consultant Company: URS

Point Of Contact: Michael W. Ander

Date Enrolled: 7/8/2000

Contact Phone: (219) 426-4704

Contact City,St,Zip: Ft. Wayne, IN 46802-

Contact Address2: Suite 500

Contact Address: 111 East Wayne Street

Contact Name: Anthony Zirille

Latitude: 41.77745

Longitude: -88.28334

US EPA Id: ILD981192560

IL EPA Id: 0894075059

SRP:

Acres: 0.02999

Worker Caution: False

Engineered Barriers: Not reported

Institutional Controls: Groundwater use restriction

RA City,St,Zip: Ft. Wayne, IN 46802-

RA Secondary Address: Suite 500

RA Address: 111 East Wayne Street

RA Company: EIG Village Mart, LLC

Remediation Applicant Name: Anthony Zirille

Remediation Applicant Title: Mr.

Comprehensive / Focused: Focused

Type Of Site: Industrial/Commercial

Date NFR Recorded: 5/17/2001

NFR Letter: 11/14/2000

Illinois EPA Id: 0894075059

IL INSTUTIONAL CONTROL:

6562 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster P

1.243 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

703 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60504

WNW 950 NORTH FARNSWORTH AVENUE SRP N/A

P101 VILLAGE MART ONE HOUR CLEANERS INST CONTROL S104491890

TC2800629.2s Page 237
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Acres: 0.02999

Worker Caution: False

Barrier: Not reported

Institutional Controls: Groundwater use restriction

Comprehensive/Focused: Focused

Site Type: Industrial/Commercial

NFR Letter Date Recorded: 5/17/2001

NFR Letter: 11/14/2000

Site Name: Village Mart One Hour Cleaners

Illinois EPA: 0894075059

Remediation Applicant City,St,Zip: Ft. Wayne, IN 46802-

Remediation Applicant Address 2: Suite 500

Remediation Applicant Address: 111 East Wayne Street

Remediation Applicant Company: EIG Village Mart, LLC

Remediation Applicant Name: Mr. Anthony Zirille

Remediation Applicant Title: Mr.

Remediation Applicant Co: EIG Village Mart, LLC

No Further Remediation Letter Dt: 11/14/2000

Total Acres: 0.03

Active: False

VILLAGE MART ONE HOUR CLEANERS (Continued) S104491890

7014 ft.

1.328 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

712 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 

SW N/A

102 FOX VALLEY PARK DISTRICT #3 IL NIPC S100789651

NFA/NFR Letter: 1/27/1994

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 2/29/1992

20 Report Received: 2/29/1992

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 731

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Northbrook, IL 60062

PRP Address: 736 Greenwood

PRP Contact: Not reported

PRP Name: JEFF LITNER

Email: Not reported

Project Manager Phone: Not reported

Project Manager: Rominger

IEMA Date: 12/13/1989

Product: Gasoline

IL EPA Id: 0894075141

Incident Num: 892626

LUST:

7175 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster Q

1.359 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

712 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60504

WNW 1160 NORTH FARNSWORTH AVE. N/A

Q103 BICKETT’S CAR WASH LUST S104527374

TC2800629.2s Page 238
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

BICKETT’S CAR WASH (Continued) S104527374

Tank Capacity: 5000

Tank Number: 2

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: 1/1/1970

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 3/14/1986

Last Used Date: 8/28/1998

Tank Substance: Gasoline

Tank Capacity: 5000

Tank Number: 1

Owner City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60505

Owner Address: 1302 Plain Ave

Owner Id: U0012073

Owner Name: Kard Gas

Facility Type: Golf Course

Facility Status: Closed

Facility ID: 2017172

UST:

NFR Date Recorded: 3/9/1999

NFA/NFR Letter: 2/11/1999

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 10/29/1998

20 Report Received: 9/25/1998

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 732

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: 6308592120

PRP City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60505

PRP Address: 1302 Plain Ave.

PRP Contact: Sharon Poss

PRP Name: Kard Gas

Email: Mike.Lowder@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 785-5734

Project Manager: Lowder

IEMA Date: 8/31/1998

Product: Gasoline, Deisel

IL EPA Id: 0894075999

Incident Num: 982173

LUST:

7190 ft.

1.362 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

686 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60505

WSW 1302 PLAIN AVE UST N/A

104 KARD GAS LUST U000176886

TC2800629.2s Page 239
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: 1/1/1970

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 3/14/1986

Last Used Date: 8/28/1998

Tank Substance: Diesel Fuel

Tank Capacity: 5000

Tank Number: 3

Fee Due: Not reported

Self Service Permit Expire Date: Not reported

Self Service Permit Inspection Date: Not reported

Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported

Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Green Tag Decal: Not reported

Install Date: 1/1/1970

Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported

Tank Status: Removed

OSFM First Notify Date: 3/14/1986

Last Used Date: 8/28/1998

Tank Substance: Gasoline

KARD GAS (Continued) U000176886

NFR Date Recorded: 9/11/2006

NFA/NFR Letter: 7/17/2006

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 6/29/2001

20 Report Received: 6/8/2001

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 732

Site Classification: HIGH

PRP Phone: 6308510024

PRP City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60505

PRP Address: 1700 North Farnsworth Ave., Suite 24

PRP Contact: Al Olieh

PRP Name: Citgo

Email: Scott.McGill@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 524-5137

Project Manager: McGill

IEMA Date: 5/18/2001

Product: Gasoline

IL EPA Id: 0894075871

Incident Num: 20010859

LUST:

7206 ft.

1.365 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60505

WSW 420 NORTH FARNSWORTH N/A

105 CITGO LUST S104968058

TC2800629.2s Page 240
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

NFR Date Recorded: 12/8/2006

NFA/NFR Letter: 10/26/2006

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 3/21/2005

20 Report Received: 2/14/2005

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: P.A.

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Not reported

PRP Address: Not reported

PRP Contact: Not reported

PRP Name: Not reported

Email: Steve.Kasa@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 557-7048

Project Manager: Kasa

IEMA Date: 1/25/2005

Product: Gasoline

IL EPA Id: 0894075821

Incident Num: 20050131

LUST:

7260 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster Q

1.375 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

711 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60505

WNW 1180 NORTH FARNSWORTH AVENUE N/A

Q106 LUNDGREN DOWLING LUST S106781185

NFR Date Recorded: 6/11/1998

NFA/NFR Letter: 8/19/1997

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 5/4/1995

20 Report Received: 3/23/1995

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 732

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Glen Ellyn, IL 60137

PRP Address: 800 Roosevelt Rd., Bldg. E. Suite 200

PRP Contact: Maureen Turman

PRP Name: Clark Oil & Refining

Email: Steve.Putrich@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 524-4827

Project Manager: Putrich

IEMA Date: 3/20/1995

Product: Gasoline

IL EPA Id: 0894075821

Incident Num: 950562

LUST:

7260 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster Q

1.375 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

711 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60505

WNW 1180 NORTH FARNSWORTH AVENUE N/A

Q107 CLARK OIL & REFINING LUST S104522650

TC2800629.2s Page 241
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

NFR Date Recorded: 5/25/1999

NFA/NFR Letter: 11/4/1998

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 1/12/1998

20 Report Received: 9/6/1996

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 732

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Akron, OH 44316-0001

PRP Address: 1144 East Market St.

PRP Contact: Joe Smerglia

PRP Name: Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Email: Steve.Putrich@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 524-4827

Project Manager: Putrich

IEMA Date: 8/15/1996

Product: Other Petro

IL EPA Id: 0894075951

Incident Num: 961456

LUST:

7284 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster Q

1.380 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

710 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60505

WNW 1175 NORTH FARNSWORTH AVE. N/A

Q108 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER LUST S104521936

IEMA Date: 12/4/1992

Product: Uset Oil

IL EPA Id: 0894075182

Incident Num: 923452

NFR Date Recorded: 4/23/2007

NFA/NFR Letter: 1/18/2006

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 3/29/1993

20 Report Received: 10/18/2005

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 731

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60503

PRP Address: 1542 East New York St.

PRP Contact: Gerald Murphy

PRP Name: Jerry Yusim Datsun

Email: Bradley.Dilbaitis@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 785-8378

Project Manager: Dilbaitis

IEMA Date: 3/26/1992

Product: Uset Oil

IL EPA Id: 0894075182

Incident Num: 920799

LUST:

7467 ft.

1.414 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

719 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60503

SW 1542 EAST NEW YORK ST. N/A

109 JERRY YUSIM DATSUN LUST S104524294

TC2800629.2s Page 242
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

NFR Date Recorded: 4/23/2007

NFA/NFR Letter: 1/18/2006

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 10/18/2005

20 Report Received: 2/1/1993

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 731

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Naperville, IL 60567-4886

PRP Address: P.O. Box 4886

PRP Contact: Jerry Yusim

PRP Name: Jerry Yusim Datsun

Email: Bradley.Dilbaitis@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 785-8378

Project Manager: Dilbaitis

JERRY YUSIM DATSUN (Continued) S104524294

Pay Assignee: Not reported

Date Approved: 10/27/2009

Running Total: 46927138.81

Amount To Be Paid: 15430.87

Incident Number: 20031636-57407

Queue Date: 9/15/2009

Facility Name: AURORA 66 #33

LUST TRUST:

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 12/19/2003

20 Report Received: 12/1/2003

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: P.A.

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Not reported

PRP Address: Not reported

PRP Contact: Not reported

PRP Name: Not reported

Email: Wayne.Zuehlke@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 557-6937

Project Manager: Zuehlke

IEMA Date: 11/7/2003

Product: Gasoline

IL EPA Id: 0894075859

Incident Num: 20031636

LUST:

7668 ft.

1.452 mi.

Relative:

Lower

Actual:

706 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60505

WNW 1331 NORTH FARNSWORTH AVENUE LUST TRUST N/A

110 CONOCO PHILLIPS LUST S106058510

TC2800629.2s Page 243
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: Not reported

20 Report Received: Not reported

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 731

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60507

PRP Address: P.O. Box 50

PRP Contact: Paul Hawkins

PRP Name: Water Prod. Co.

Email: Not reported

Project Manager Phone: Not reported

Project Manager: NOT ASSIGNED

IEMA Date: 1/14/1993

Product: Gasoline

IL EPA Id: 0434075025

Incident Num: 930138

LUST:

7680 ft.

1.454 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

723 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60507

SE 3255 EAST NEW YORK ST. N/A

111 WATER PROD. CO. LUST S104524180

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: 12/6/1991

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 2/29/1992

20 Report Received: 2/29/1992

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 731

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Naperville, IL 60566

PRP Address: P.O. Box 151

PRP Contact: John Gase

PRP Name: Agrinetics

Email: Not reported

Project Manager Phone: Not reported

Project Manager: Irwin

IEMA Date: 1/15/1991

Product: Gasoline

IL EPA Id: 0894075788

Incident Num: 910133

LUST:

7717 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster R

1.462 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

720 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60505

SW 1515 EAST NEW YORK ST. N/A

R112 AGRINETICS LUST S104526296

TC2800629.2s Page 244
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

NFR Date Recorded: 5/15/2002

NFA/NFR Letter: 1/18/2002

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: 5/18/1994

20 Report Received: 4/20/1994

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 732

Site Classification: LOW

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Aurora, IL 60507

PRP Address: P.O. Box 517

PRP Contact: Joan Soderdahl

PRP Name: Susan Carson

Email: Not reported

Project Manager Phone: (217) 782-6762

Project Manager: Ingold

IEMA Date: 3/29/1994

Product: Gasoline

IL EPA Id: 0894075896

Incident Num: 940663

LUST:

7839 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster R

1.485 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

720 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60505

SW 1500 EAST NEW YORK ST. N/A

R113 CARSON, SUSAN LUST S104523281

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: FOX VALLEY FORD

Owner/Operator Summary:

 hazardous waste at any time

 waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of

 hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous

 waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of

Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous

Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator

EPA Region: 05

Contact email: Not reported

Contact telephone: (312) 820-1500

Contact country: US

 AURORA, IL 60505

Contact address: 1401 N FARNSWORTH

Contact: FRAN CIRRINCIONE

EPA ID: ILD050659655

 AURORA, IL 60505

Facility address: 1401 N FARNSWORTH

Facility name: FOX VALLEY FORD

Date form received by agency: 02/11/1988

RCRA-SQG:

7859 ft.

1.489 mi.

Relative:

Higher

Actual:

711 ft.

> 1 AURORA, IL 60505 LUST

NW 1401 N FARNSWORTH FINDS ILD050659655

114 FOX VALLEY FORD RCRA-SQG 1000135412

TC2800629.2s Page 245
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations

ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the

Environmental Interest/Information System 

Registry ID: 110005830574

FINDS:

Violation Status: No violations found

 WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE.

 MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT

 WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE

 FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET,

 CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE

 LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS

Waste name: IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF

Waste code: D001

Waste name: Not Defined

Waste code: D000

Hazardous Waste Summary:

Off-site waste receiver: Verified to be non-commercial

Used oil transporter: No

Used oil transfer facility: No

Used oil Specification marketer: No

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No

User oil refiner: No

Used oil processor: No

Used oil fuel burner: No

Furnace exemption: No

On-site burner exemption: No

Underground injection activity: No

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No

Transporter of hazardous waste: No

Recycler of hazardous waste: No

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Unknown

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No

Handler Activities Summary:

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Operator

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

Owner/operator country: Not reported

 CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998

Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED

Owner/operator name: NAME NOT REPORTED

Owner/Op end date: Not reported

Owner/Op start date: Not reported

Owner/Operator Type: Owner

Legal status: Private

Owner/operator telephone: (312) 555-1212

FOX VALLEY FORD (Continued) 1000135412

TC2800629.2s Page 246
Map ID MAP FINDINGS

Direction

Distance EDR ID Number

Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number

NFR Date Recorded: Not reported

NFA/NFR Letter: 1/6/1997

Section 57.5(g) Letter: Not reported

45 Report Received: Not reported

20 Report Received: Not reported

Non LUST Determination Letter: Not reported

Section 57.5(g) Letter: 731

Site Classification: Not reported

PRP Phone: Not reported

PRP City,St,Zip: Dearborn, MI 48126

PRP Address: 1 Park Lane Blvd., Suite 1500 East

PRP Contact: Dan Gordan

PRP Name: Ford Motor Co.

Email: Steve.Putrich@illinois.gov

Project Manager Phone: (217) 524-4827

Project Manager: Putrich

IEMA Date: 5/8/1989

Product: Non Petro

IL EPA Id: 0894075066

Incident Num: 890746

LUST:

corrective action activities required under RCRA.

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource

FOX VALLEY FORD (Continued) 1000135412

TC2800629.2s Page 247
ORPHAN SUMMARY

City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s)

AURORA 1005635243 IL & INDIAN TRL FINDS, AIRS

AURORA 1003870051 RT 25 & E SULLIVAN RD 60504 CERC-NFRAP

AURORA 1008111941 875 RT 25 60505 FINDS, AIRS

AURORA 1004476065 RT 25 FINDS, AIRS

AURORA 1000217312 RT 31 CERC-NFRAP, CORRACTS, RCRA-LQ

TRIS, PADS, MANIFEST, MANIFEST

AURORA 1008110605 RT 31 60504 FINDS, AIRS

AURORA S108112978 SCHINDLBECK,JOE P 527TH ST 60505 SWF/LF

AURORA S108110792 BFI 1565 AURORA AVENUE LN 60504 SWF/LF

AURORA U001144754 OAKHURST FOREST PRESERVE 1850 5TH AVE 60504 UST

AURORA S109615995 BRK ELECTRONICS PITTWAY CORP 780 MC CLURE RD 60504 MANIFEST

AURORA S107740357 BRK ELECTRONICS INC 780 MC CLURE RD 60504 AIRS

AURORA S110151047 BATAVIA 2700 COUNTY LINE FARM 60504 TIER 2

AURORA S110152234 DUR-O-WAL, INC. 625 CRANE STREET 60505 TIER 2

AURORA S109092626 D W CLEANERS 2380 S EOLA RD DRYCLEANERS

AURORA 1008210294 2211 S EOLA RD 60504 FINDS, AIRS

AURORA S106540560 ALL CLEANERS 2211 S EOLA RD DRYCLEANERS

AURORA S109147850 SHELL OIL PRODUCTS US 1851 N FARNSWORTH AVE 60505 LUST

AURORA S109147913 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA 948 N FARNSWORTH AVE 60505 LUST

AURORA 1012178606 SEARS 1660 2 FOX VALLEY MALL 60504 RCRA-SQG

AURORA S110150575 AKZO NOBEL PAINTS LLC 300 EAST INDIAN TRAIL ROAD 60505 TIER 2

AURORA 1008151257 MCCLURE RD FINDS, AIRS

AURORA U003985268 TELEDYNE PINES 601 W NEW YORK ST AIRS

AURORA S108536318 PRIME CLEANERS 3015 E NEW YORK ST 60504 DRYCLEANERS

AURORA 1005443424 1020 NEW YORK ST RCRA-NonGen, FINDS

AURORA S107739259 WISEMAN-HUGHES ENTERPRISES 30260 E NEW YORK ST 60504 SRP

AURORA 1006807450 PENSKE TRUCK LEASING 641 N OHIO ST 60505 RCRA-CESQG, FINDS

AURORA 1000862443 4006 THRU 4080 FOX VALLEY RCRA-NonGen, FINDS

AURORA U003972442 CITGO 2112 UNITED STATES HIGHWAY 34 60504 UST

NAPERVILLE U004127996 MARATHON CITGO STATION RT 59 & FERRY RD 60563 UST

NAPERVILLE S107744241 MIDWEST SOIL REMEDIATION INC 29551 N AURORA RD 60563 AIRS

NAPERVILLE S109261618 YOUNGS CLEANERS 1665 N RT 59 60563 DRYCLEANERS

RICHMOND S109040948 8600 WHARF ST 60563 CHMIRS, HAZNET

TC2800629.2s Page 248
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency

on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.

Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days

from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

Federal NPL site list

NPL: National Priority List

National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority

cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon

coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center

(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.

Date of Government Version: 03/31/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/02/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010

Number of Days to Update: 10

Source: EPA

Telephone: N/A

Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/26/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

NPL Site Boundaries

Sources:

EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)

Telephone: 202-564-7333

EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6

Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659

EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7

Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247

EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8

Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774

EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9

Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246

EPA Region 10

Telephone 206-553-8665

Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites

A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule

in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on

the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.

Date of Government Version: 03/31/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/02/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010

Number of Days to Update: 10

Source: EPA

Telephone: N/A

Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/26/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens

Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority

to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner

received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.

Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994

Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994

Number of Days to Update: 56

Source: EPA

Telephone: 202-564-4267

Last EDR Contact: 05/17/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/30/2010

Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

TC2800629.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal Delisted NPL site list

DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions

The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the

EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the

NPL where no further response is appropriate.

Date of Government Version: 03/31/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/02/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010

Number of Days to Update: 10

Source: EPA

Telephone: N/A

Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/26/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

Federal CERCLIS list

CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System

CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities,

private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,

and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities

List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.

Date of Government Version: 01/29/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/09/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010

Number of Days to Update: 62

Source: EPA

Telephone: 703-412-9810

Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/12/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing

A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive

Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPAa??s Federal

Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.

Date of Government Version: 06/23/2009

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2010

Number of Days to Update: 26

Source: Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 703-603-8704

Last EDR Contact: 04/30/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/26/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List

CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned

Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status

indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined

no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates

this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time.

This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that,

based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. 

Date of Government Version: 06/23/2009

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/02/2009

Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009

Number of Days to Update: 19

Source: EPA

Telephone: 703-412-9810

Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/13/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list

CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report

CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.

TC2800629.2s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 03/25/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010

Number of Days to Update: 57

Source: EPA

Telephone: 800-424-9346

Last EDR Contact: 05/17/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/30/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list

RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal

RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation

and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database

includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste

as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that

move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the

waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.

Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010

Number of Days to Update: 87

Source: Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 312-886-6186

Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

Federal RCRA generators list

RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators

RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation

and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database

includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste

as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate

over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.

Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010

Number of Days to Update: 87

Source: Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 312-886-6186

Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators

RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation

and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database

includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste

as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate

between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.

Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010

Number of Days to Update: 87

Source: Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 312-886-6186

Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators

RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation

and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database

includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste

as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators

(CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.

Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010

Number of Days to Update: 87

Source: Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 312-886-6186

Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

TC2800629.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries

US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List

A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building

foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental

media or effect human health.

Date of Government Version: 12/20/2009

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010

Number of Days to Update: 82

Source: Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 703-603-0695

Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls

A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,

such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation

care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally

required as part of the institutional controls.

Date of Government Version: 12/20/2009

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010

Number of Days to Update: 82

Source: Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 703-603-0695

Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

Federal ERNS list

ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System

Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous

substances.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 02/11/2010

Number of Days to Update: 20

Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard

Telephone: 202-267-2180

Last EDR Contact: 04/07/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010

Data Release Frequency: Annually

State- and tribal - equivalent NPL

CAT: Category List

Sites on this list are: Notice of Response Action, NPL, Pre/proposed NPL, Completed Remedial Action, Site Remediation

Program, Federal Facilities, and Cleanup Started and/or Completed Sites.

Date of Government Version: 06/01/1997

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/1997

Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/1997

Number of Days to Update: 38

Source: Illinois EPA

Telephone: N/A

Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2001

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A

Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS

SHWS: State Oversight List

State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites

may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds

(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially

responsible parties. Available information varies by state.

Date of Government Version: 03/01/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2010

Number of Days to Update: 8

Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 217-524-4826

Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

TC2800629.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists

LF WMRC: Waste Management & Research Center Landfill Database

The Waste Management & Research Center Landfill Database includes records from the Department of Public Health,

Department of Mines & Minerals, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, State Geological Survey, Northeastern

Illinois Planning Commission and Pollution Control Board.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2001

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/06/2006

Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2006

Number of Days to Update: 31

Source: Department of Natural Resources

Telephone: 217-333-8940

Last EDR Contact: 09/18/2009

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/28/2009

Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

SWF/LF: Available Disposal for Solid Waste in Illinois - Solid Waste Landfills Subject to State Surcharge

Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal

facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities

or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal

sites.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2010

Number of Days to Update: 36

Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 217-785-8604

Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Annually

LF SPECIAL WASTE: Special Waste Site List

These landfills, as of January 1, 1990, accept non-hazardous special waste pursuant to the Illinois EPA Non-Hazardous

Special Waste Definition. List A includes landfills that may receive any non-hazardous waste, Non-Regional Pollution

Control Facilities are so noted. List B includes landfills designed to receive specific non-hazardous wastes.

List B landfills are designated as a Regional Pollution Control Facility by RPCF, or Non-Regional Pollution Control

Facility by Non-RPCF.

Date of Government Version: 01/01/1990

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2009

Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2009

Number of Days to Update: 28

Source: Illinois EPA

Telephone: 217-782-9288

Last EDR Contact: 06/10/2009

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A

Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

IL NIPC: Solid Waste Landfill Inventory

Solid Waste Landfill Inventory. NIPC is an inventory of active and inactive solid waste disposal sites, based

on state, local government and historical archive data. Included are numerous sites which previously had never

been identified largely because there was no obligation to register such sites prior to 1971.

Date of Government Version: 08/01/1988

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/1994

Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/1994

Number of Days to Update: 11

Source: Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission

Telephone: 312-454-0400

Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2006

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A

Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

State and tribal leaking storage tank lists

LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites

Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground

storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state.

Date of Government Version: 04/30/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2010

Number of Days to Update: 16

Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 217-782-6762

Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

TC2800629.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
LUST TRUST: Underground Storage Tank Fund Payment Prioirty List

In case sufficient funds are not available in the Underground Storage Tank Fund, requests for payment are entered

on the Payment Priority List by "queue date" order. As required by the Environmental Protection Act, the queue

date is the date that a complete request for partial or final payment was received by the Agency. The queue date

is "officially" confirmed at the end of the payment review process when a Final Decision Letter is sent to the

site owner.

Date of Government Version: 04/20/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2010

Number of Days to Update: 16

Source: Illinois EPA

Telephone: 217-782-6762

Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada

Date of Government Version: 02/01/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010

Number of Days to Update: 40

Source: Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 415-972-3372

Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.

Date of Government Version: 03/10/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010

Number of Days to Update: 27

Source: EPA Region 4

Telephone: 404-562-8677

Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.

Date of Government Version: 05/04/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010

Number of Days to Update: 22

Source: EPA Region 10

Telephone: 206-553-2857

Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.

Date of Government Version: 02/19/2009

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2009

Date Made Active in Reports: 03/16/2009

Number of Days to Update: 25

Source: EPA Region 1

Telephone: 617-918-1313

Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.

Date of Government Version: 05/03/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010

Number of Days to Update: 22

Source: EPA Region 6

Telephone: 214-665-6597

Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska

TC2800629.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 03/24/2009

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2009

Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2009

Number of Days to Update: 28

Source: EPA Region 7

Telephone: 913-551-7003

Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.

Date of Government Version: 02/25/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/25/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010

Number of Days to Update: 46

Source: EPA Region 8

Telephone: 303-312-6271

Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

State and tribal registered storage tank lists

UST: Underground Storage Tank Facility List

Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery

Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available

information varies by state program.

Date of Government Version: 05/03/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2010

Number of Days to Update: 16

Source: Illinois State Fire Marshal

Telephone: 217-785-0969

Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian

land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee

and Tribal Nations)

Date of Government Version: 03/10/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010

Number of Days to Update: 27

Source: EPA Region 4

Telephone: 404-562-9424

Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian

land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).

Date of Government Version: 02/01/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010

Number of Days to Update: 40

Source: EPA Region 9

Telephone: 415-972-3368

Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian

land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).

Date of Government Version: 02/25/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/25/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010

Number of Days to Update: 46

Source: EPA Region 8

Telephone: 303-312-6137

Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

TC2800629.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian

land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).

Date of Government Version: 02/11/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010

Number of Days to Update: 60

Source: EPA Region 5

Telephone: 312-886-6136

Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian

land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).

Date of Government Version: 04/01/2008

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/30/2008

Date Made Active in Reports: 03/16/2009

Number of Days to Update: 76

Source: EPA Region 7

Telephone: 913-551-7003

Last EDR Contact: 05/12/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian

land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).

Date of Government Version: 05/03/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010

Number of Days to Update: 22

Source: EPA Region 6

Telephone: 214-665-7591

Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian

land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal

Nations).

Date of Government Version: 02/19/2009

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2009

Date Made Active in Reports: 03/16/2009

Number of Days to Update: 25

Source: EPA, Region 1

Telephone: 617-918-1313

Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian

land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).

Date of Government Version: 05/04/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010

Number of Days to Update: 22

Source: EPA Region 10

Telephone: 206-553-2857

Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing

A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.

Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010

Number of Days to Update: 55

Source: FEMA

Telephone: 202-646-5797

Last EDR Contact: 04/19/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries

TC2800629.2s Page GR-8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
ENG CONTROLS: Sites with Engineering Controls

Sites using of engineered barriers (e.g., asphalt or concrete paving).

Date of Government Version: 04/23/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/26/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2010

Number of Days to Update: 24

Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 217-782-6761

Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/09/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

Inst Control: Institutional Controls

Legal or administrative restrictions on land use and/or other activities (e.g., groundwater use restrictions)

which effectively limit exposure to contamination may be employed as alternatives to removal or treatment of contamination.

Date of Government Version: 04/23/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/26/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2010

Number of Days to Update: 24

Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 217-782-6761

Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/09/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites

INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing

A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.

Date of Government Version: 04/02/2008

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008

Number of Days to Update: 27

Source: EPA, Region 1

Telephone: 617-918-1102

Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng

A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.

Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008

Number of Days to Update: 27

Source: EPA, Region 7

Telephone: 913-551-7365

Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009

Data Release Frequency: Varies

SRP: Site Remediation Program Database

The database identifies the status of all voluntary remediation projects administered through the pre-notice site

cleanup program (1989 to 1995) and the site remediation program (1996 to the present).

Date of Government Version: 04/23/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/26/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2010

Number of Days to Update: 24

Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 217-785-9407

Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/09/2010

Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

State and tribal Brownfields sites

BROWNFIELDS: Municipal Brownfields Redevelopment Grant Program Project Descriptions

The Illinois Municipal Brownfields Redevelopment Grant Program (MBRGP) offers grants worth a maximum of $240,000

each to municipalities to assist in site investigation activities, development of cleanup objectives, and performance

of cleanup activities. Brownfields are abandoned or underused industrial and/or commercial properties that are

contaminated (or thought to be contaminated) and have an active potential for redevelopment.

Date of Government Version: 02/10/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2010

Number of Days to Update: 7

Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 217-785-3486

Last EDR Contact: 05/17/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

TC2800629.2s Page GR-9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
BROWNFIELDS: Redevelopment Assessment Database

The Office of Site Evaluations Redevelopment Assessment database identifies the status of all properties within

the State in which the Illinois EPA’s Office of Site Evaluation has conducted a municipal Brownfield Redevelopment

Assessment.

Date of Government Version: 05/03/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2010

Number of Days to Update: 16

Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 217-524-1658

Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

Local Brownfield lists

US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites

Included in the listing are brownfields properties addresses by Cooperative Agreement Recipients and brownfields

properties addressed by Targeted Brownfields Assessments. Targeted Brownfields Assessments-EPA’s Targeted Brownfields

Assessments (TBA) program is designed to help states, tribes, and municipalities--especially those without EPA

Brownfields Assessment Demonstration Pilots--minimize the uncertainties of contamination often associated with

brownfields. Under the TBA program, EPA provides funding and/or technical assistance for environmental assessments

at brownfields sites throughout the country. Targeted Brownfields Assessments supplement and work with other efforts

under EPA’s Brownfields Initiative to promote cleanup and redevelopment of brownfields. Cooperative Agreement

Recipients-States, political subdivisions, territories, and Indian tribes become Brownfields Cleanup Revolving

Loan Fund (BCRLF) cooperative agreement recipients when they enter into BCRLF cooperative agreements with the

U.S. EPA. EPA selects BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients based on a proposal and application process. BCRLF

cooperative agreement recipients must use EPA funds provided through BCRLF cooperative agreement for specified

brownfields-related cleanup activities.

Date of Government Version: 03/02/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/23/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010

Number of Days to Update: 55

Source: Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 202-566-2777

Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/12/2010

Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites

ODI: Open Dump Inventory

An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258

Subtitle D Criteria.

Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004

Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004

Number of Days to Update: 39

Source: Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 800-424-9346

Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A

Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations

A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside

County and northern Imperial County, California.

Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009

Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009

Number of Days to Update: 137

Source: EPA, Region 9

Telephone: 415-972-3336

Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/20/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

LF SPECIAL WASTE: Special Waste Site List

These landfills, as of January 1, 1990, accept non-hazardous special waste pursuant to the Illinois EPA Non-Hazardous

Special Waste Definition. List A includes landfills that may receive any non-hazardous waste, Non-Regional Pollution

Control Facilities are so noted. List B includes landfills designed to receive specific non-hazardous wastes.

List B landfills are designated as a Regional Pollution Control Facility by RPCF, or Non-Regional Pollution Control

Facility by Non-RPCF.

TC2800629.2s Page GR-10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 01/01/1990

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2009

Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2009

Number of Days to Update: 28

Source: Illinois EPA

Telephone: 217-782-9288

Last EDR Contact: 06/10/2009

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A

Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands

Location of open dumps on Indian land.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007

Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008

Number of Days to Update: 52

Source: Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 703-308-8245

Last EDR Contact: 06/08/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/23/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites

US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs

A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this

web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported

they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.

In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry

and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,

contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.

Date of Government Version: 08/19/2009

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/29/2009

Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2010

Number of Days to Update: 43

Source: Drug Enforcement Administration

Telephone: 202-307-1000

Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/20/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

CDL: Meth Drug Lab Site Listing

A listing of clandestine/meth drug lab locations.

Date of Government Version: 04/21/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2010

Number of Days to Update: 28

Source: Department of Public Health

Telephone: 217-782-5750

Last EDR Contact: 04/19/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register

A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this

web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported

they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.

In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry

and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,

contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.

Date of Government Version: 09/01/2007

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2008

Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/2009

Number of Days to Update: 131

Source: Drug Enforcement Administration

Telephone: 202-307-1000

Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009

Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

Local Land Records

LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information

A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent

Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.

CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.

TC2800629.2s Page GR-11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 02/05/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010

Number of Days to Update: 60

Source: Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 202-564-6023

Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System

LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure

properties.

Date of Government Version: 12/09/2005

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/11/2006

Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007

Number of Days to Update: 31

Source: Department of the Navy

Telephone: 843-820-7326

Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/06/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

Records of Emergency Release Reports

HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System

Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.

Date of Government Version: 04/06/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010

Number of Days to Update: 50

Source: U.S. Department of Transportation

Telephone: 202-366-4555

Last EDR Contact: 04/07/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010

Data Release Frequency: Annually

SPILLS: State spills

A listing of incidents reported to the Office of Emergency Response.

Date of Government Version: 04/19/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/21/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2010

Number of Days to Update: 29

Source: Illinois EPA

Telephone: 217-558-1677

Last EDR Contact: 04/19/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

Other Ascertainable Records

RCRA-NonGen: RCRA - Non Generators

RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation

and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database

includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste

as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous

waste.

Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010

Number of Days to Update: 87

Source: Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 312-886-6186

Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data

Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.

Date of Government Version: 01/12/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/09/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010

Number of Days to Update: 62

Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety

Telephone: 202-366-4595

Last EDR Contact: 05/12/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/23/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

TC2800629.2s Page GR-12

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DOD: Department of Defense Sites

This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that

have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006

Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007

Number of Days to Update: 62

Source: USGS

Telephone: 703-692-8801

Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2010

Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites

The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers

is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/30/2009

Date Made Active in Reports: 12/01/2009

Number of Days to Update: 62

Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Telephone: 202-528-4285

Last EDR Contact: 06/16/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees

Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released

periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.

Date of Government Version: 04/11/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010

Number of Days to Update: 28

Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library

Telephone: Varies

Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

ROD: Records Of Decision

Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical

and health information to aid in the cleanup.

Date of Government Version: 04/29/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010

Number of Days to Update: 20

Source: EPA

Telephone: 703-416-0223

Last EDR Contact: 06/16/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010

Data Release Frequency: Annually

UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites

Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills

shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from

the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings

were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.

Date of Government Version: 01/05/2009

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/08/2009

Number of Days to Update: 1

Source: Department of Energy

Telephone: 505-845-0011

Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/13/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

MINES: Mines Master Index File

Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes

violation information.

Date of Government Version: 02/12/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010

Number of Days to Update: 68

Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration

Telephone: 303-231-5959

Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/20/2010

Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

TC2800629.2s Page GR-13

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System

Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and

land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/13/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2010

Number of Days to Update: 36

Source: EPA

Telephone: 202-566-0250

Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/13/2010

Data Release Frequency: Annually

TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act

Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the

TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant

site.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2002

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2006

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006

Number of Days to Update: 46

Source: EPA

Telephone: 202-260-5521

Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/12/2010

Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years

FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)

FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,

TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the

Agency on a quarterly basis.

Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009

Number of Days to Update: 25

Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances

Telephone: 202-566-1667

Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/13/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)

A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.

Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009

Number of Days to Update: 25

Source: EPA

Telephone: 202-566-1667

Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/13/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing

A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The

information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA

(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions

are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters

with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included

in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.

Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007

Number of Days to Update: 40

Source: Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 202-564-2501

Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008

Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing

A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA

regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation

of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some

EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing

EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that

may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.

TC2800629.2s Page GR-14

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007

Number of Days to Update: 40

Source: Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 202-564-2501

Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008

Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems

Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all

registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March

1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices

being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2010

Number of Days to Update: 35

Source: EPA

Telephone: 202-564-4203

Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Annually

ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System

The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement

and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)

program.

Date of Government Version: 04/24/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010

Number of Days to Update: 18

Source: Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 202-564-5088

Last EDR Contact: 03/29/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/12/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

PADS: PCB Activity Database System

PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers

of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.

Date of Government Version: 09/01/2009

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2009

Date Made Active in Reports: 12/01/2009

Number of Days to Update: 41

Source: EPA

Telephone: 202-566-0500

Last EDR Contact: 04/22/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2010

Data Release Frequency: Annually

MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System

MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which

possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,

EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.

Date of Government Version: 03/18/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010

Number of Days to Update: 51

Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Telephone: 301-415-7169

Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

RADINFO: Radiation Information Database

The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.

Date of Government Version: 04/13/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010

Number of Days to Update: 33

Source: Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 202-343-9775

Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/26/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

TC2800629.2s Page GR-15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System

Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more

detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric

Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial

enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal

Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities

Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).

Date of Government Version: 04/14/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010

Number of Days to Update: 41

Source: EPA

Telephone: (312) 353-2000

Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System

RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA

pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration

actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of

the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources

made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.

Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995

Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995

Number of Days to Update: 35

Source: EPA

Telephone: 202-564-4104

Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008

Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

BRS: Biennial Reporting System

The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation

and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)

and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2007

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/25/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2010

Number of Days to Update: 76

Source: EPA/NTIS

Telephone: 800-424-9346

Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/06/2010

Data Release Frequency: Biennially

UIC: Underground Injection Wells

Injection wells are used for disposal of fluids by "injection" into the subsurface. The construction of injection

wells range from very technical designs with twenty-four hour monitoring to simply a hole dug in the ground to

control runoff. As a result of this diversity, the UIC Program divides injection wells into five different classes.

Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2010

Number of Days to Update: 7

Source: Illinois EPA

Telephone: 217-782-9878

Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/13/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

NPDES: A Listing of Active Permits

A listing of facilities currently active in the state. The types of permits are public, private, federal and state.

Date of Government Version: 01/15/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2010

Number of Days to Update: 11

Source: Illinois EPA

Telephone: 217-782-0610

Last EDR Contact: 04/12/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/26/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

DRYCLEANERS: Illinois Licensed Drycleaners

Any retail drycleaning facility in Illinois must apply for a license through the Illinois Drycleaner Environmental

Response Trust Fund. Drycleaner Environmental Response Trust Fund of Illinois.

TC2800629.2s Page GR-16

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/04/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2010

Number of Days to Update: 34

Source: Drycleaner Environmental Response Trust Fund of Illinois

Telephone: 800-765-4041

Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/13/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

IMPDMENT: Surface Impoundment Inventory

Statewide inventory of industrial, municipal, mining, oil & gas , and large agricultural impoundment. This study

was conducted by the Illinois EPA to assess potentail for contamination of shallow aquifers. This was a one-time

study. Although many of the impoundments may no longer be present, the sites may be contaminated.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/1980

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/08/2002

Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2002

Number of Days to Update: 87

Source: Illinois Waste Management & Research Center

Telephone: 217-333-8940

Last EDR Contact: 02/20/2002

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A

Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

AIRS: AIRS

A listing of air permits and emissions information.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2009

Date Made Active in Reports: 02/27/2009

Number of Days to Update: 15

Source: Illinois EPA

Telephone: 217-557-0314

Last EDR Contact: 04/12/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/26/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

TIER 2: Tier 2 Information Listing

A listing of facilities which store or manufacture hazardous materials and submit a chemical inventory report.

Date of Government Version: 02/19/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/25/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2010

Number of Days to Update: 41

Source: Illinois Emergency Management Agency

Telephone: 217-785-9860

Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/06/2010

Data Release Frequency: Annually

INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations

This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater

than 640 acres.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006

Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007

Number of Days to Update: 34

Source: USGS

Telephone: 202-208-3710

Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2010

Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing

The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office

of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established

drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,

Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.

Date of Government Version: 02/10/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010

Number of Days to Update: 60

Source: Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 615-532-8599

Last EDR Contact: 05/10/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/09/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands

Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps

of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,

Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,

Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.

TC2800629.2s Page GR-17

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006

Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007

Number of Days to Update: 339

Source: U.S. Geological Survey

Telephone: 888-275-8747

Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2010

Data Release Frequency: N/A

PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database

The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.

Date of Government Version: 01/01/2008

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/18/2009

Date Made Active in Reports: 05/29/2009

Number of Days to Update: 100

Source: Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 202-566-0517

Last EDR Contact: 05/14/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List

A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.

Date of Government Version: 11/09/2009

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/18/2009

Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2010

Number of Days to Update: 54

Source: Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: N/A

Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

COAL ASH DOE: Sleam-Electric Plan Operation Data

A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009

Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009

Number of Days to Update: 76

Source: Department of Energy

Telephone: 202-586-8719

Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2010

Data Release Frequency: Varies

EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS

EDR Proprietary Records

Manufactured Gas Plants: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants

The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)

compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s

to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture

of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,

such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds

are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently

disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil

and groundwater contamination.

Date of Government Version: N/A

Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A

Date Made Active in Reports: N/A

Number of Days to Update: N/A

Source: EDR, Inc.

Telephone: N/A

Last EDR Contact: N/A

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A

Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

EDR Historical Auto Stations: EDR Proprietary Historic Gas Stations

EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential

gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited

to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station

establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,

filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc.

TC2800629.2s Page GR-18

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A

Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A

Date Made Active in Reports: N/A

Number of Days to Update: N/A

Source: EDR, Inc.

Telephone: N/A

Last EDR Contact: N/A

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A

Data Release Frequency: Varies

EDR Historical Cleaners: EDR Proprietary Historic Dry Cleaners

EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential

dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources

that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were

not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc.

Date of Government Version: N/A

Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A

Date Made Active in Reports: N/A

Number of Days to Update: N/A

Source: EDR, Inc.

Telephone: N/A

Last EDR Contact: N/A

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A

Data Release Frequency: Varies

OTHER DATABASE(S)

Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be

complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the

area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily

mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.

CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data

Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through

transporters to a tsd facility.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2007

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/26/2009

Date Made Active in Reports: 09/11/2009

Number of Days to Update: 16

Source: Department of Environmental Protection

Telephone: 860-424-3375

Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/06/2010

Data Release Frequency: Annually

NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information

Hazardous waste manifest information.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 02/05/2010

Number of Days to Update: 16

Source: Department of Environmental Protection

Telephone: N/A

Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2010

Data Release Frequency: Annually

NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data

Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD

facility.

Date of Government Version: 04/30/2010

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/13/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2010

Number of Days to Update: 39

Source: Department of Environmental Conservation

Telephone: 518-402-8651

Last EDR Contact: 05/13/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/23/2010

Data Release Frequency: Annually

PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information

Hazardous waste manifest information.

TC2800629.2s Page GR-19

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2009

Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2009

Number of Days to Update: 13

Source: Department of Environmental Protection

Telephone: 717-783-8990

Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/06/2010

Data Release Frequency: Annually

RI MANIFEST: Manifest information

Hazardous waste manifest information

Date of Government Version: 11/03/2009

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2010

Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2010

Number of Days to Update: 10

Source: Department of Environmental Management

Telephone: 401-222-2797

Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/13/2010

Data Release Frequency: Annually

WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information

Hazardous waste manifest information.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/17/2009

Date Made Active in Reports: 08/10/2009

Number of Days to Update: 24

Source: Department of Natural Resources

Telephone: N/A

Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2010

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/04/2010

Data Release Frequency: Annually

Oil/Gas Pipelines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs

from 1:100,000-Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily

gas pipelines.

Electric Power Transmission Line Data

Source: Rextag Strategies Corp.

Telephone: (281) 769-2247

U.S. Electric Transmission and Power Plants Systems Digital GIS Data

Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity

to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all

sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,

and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.

AHA Hospitals:

Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.

Telephone: 312-280-5991

The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals.

Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

Telephone: 410-786-3000

A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,

a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Nursing Homes

Source: National Institutes of Health

Telephone: 301-594-6248

Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.

Public Schools

Source: National Center for Education Statistics

Telephone: 202-502-7300

The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary

and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical

database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are

comparable across all states.

Private Schools

Source: National Center for Education Statistics

Telephone: 202-502-7300

The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. 

TC2800629.2s Page GR-20

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Daycare Centers: Homes & Centers Listing

Source: Department of Children & Family Services

Telephone: 312-814-4150

Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2009 from the Federal

Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA.

NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR

in 2002 and 2005 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Scanned Digital USGS 7.5’ Topographic Map (DRG)

Source: United States Geologic Survey

A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images

are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image

is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection.

STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION

© 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection

and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject

to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.

TC2800629.2s Page GR-21

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TC2800629.2s Page A-1

geologic strata.

of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the

Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics

 2. Groundwater flow velocity.

 1. Groundwater flow direction, and

Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:

forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.

EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in

Most Recent Revision: 1998

East Map: 41088-G2 NAPERVILLE, IL

Most Recent Revision: 1998

Target Property Map: 41088-G3 AURORA NORTH, IL

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP

Elevation: 709 ft. above sea level

UTM Y (Meters): 4625092.0

UTM X (Meters): 395416.7

Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 16

Longitude (West): 88.2583 - 88 ̊ 15’ 29.9’’

Latitude (North): 41.77270 - 41 ̊ 46’ 21.7’’

TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES

AURORA, IL 60504

EOLA YARD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT LEVEL EA

EOLA YARD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT LEVEL EA

TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM 
TC2800629.2s Page A-2

should be field verified.

on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity

Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated

SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft) Elevation (ft)

TP

TP

0 1/2 1 Miles ✩Target Property Elevation: 709 ft.

North South

West East 715 710 718 709 719 710 709 711 709 710 712 708 710 719 717 720 730 730 740 711 710 710 711 710 704 705 703 706 709 710 710 710 712 710 707 707 713 715

General Topographic Gradient: General NW

TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY

should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.

assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,

Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to

TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).

sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data

using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other

Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional

GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY 
TC2800629.2s Page A-3

Not Reported

LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION

MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW

hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.

authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined

flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory

EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater

AQUIFLOW

 Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.

 Status: Not found

 Search Radius: 1.25 miles

Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*:

* ©1996 Site−specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under

a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation.

contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.

environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should

of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the

Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator

HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION

AURORA NORTH YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map

NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY

NWI Electronic

NWI Quad at Target Property Data Coverage

1703200025E - FEMA Q3 Flood data

1703200015D - FEMA Q3 Flood data

Additional Panels in search area: 17089C - FEMA DFIRM Flood data

Flood Plain Panel at Target Property: 1701970050B - FEMA Q3 Flood data

DUPAGE, IL YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map

FEMA FLOOD ZONE

FEMA Flood

Target Property County Electronic Data

and bodies of water).

Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways

contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.

the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should

Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist

HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY 
TC2800629.2s Page A-4

Depth to Bedrock Max: > 60 inches

Depth to Bedrock Min: > 60 inches

Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: HIGH 

Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil.

to 6 feet.

conductivity, wet state high in the profile. Depth to water table is 3

Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained. Soils have a layer of low hydraulic

movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.

Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward

Soil Surface Texture: silt loam

Soil Component Name: MORLEY 

The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data.

in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps.

for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns

Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil

DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY

Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).

of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman

Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology

ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION

Era: Paleozoic Category: Stratifed Sequence

System: Silurian

Series: Middle Silurian (Niagoaran)

Code: S2 (decoded above as Era, System & Series)

at which contaminant migration may be occurring.

Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed

GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY

move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils.

characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes

to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil

using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary

Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional

GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY 
TC2800629.2s Page A-5

gravelly - loamy sand

stratified

Deeper Soil Types: muck

silt loam

Shallow Soil Types: silty clay loam

loam

muck

Surficial Soil Types: silty clay loam

loam

muck

Soil Surface Textures: silty clay loam

appear within the general area of target property.

Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may

OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA

Min: 6.10

Max: 8.40

Min: 0.06

Max: 0.60

50%), Lean Clay

limit less than

Clays (liquid

SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED

Soils.

200), Clayey

passing No.

than 35 pct.

Materials (more

 4 42 inches 60 inches silty clay loam Silt-Clay

Min: 6.10

Max: 8.40

Min: 0.06

Max: 0.60

50%), Lean Clay

limit less than

Clays (liquid

SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED

Soils.

200), Clayey

passing No.

than 35 pct.

Materials (more

 3 28 inches 42 inches silty clay loam Silt-Clay

Min: 5.60

Max: 7.80

Min: 0.20

Max: 0.60

50%), Lean Clay

limit less than

Clays (liquid

SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED

Soils.

200), Clayey

passing No.

than 35 pct.

Materials (more

 2 9 inches 28 inches silty clay Silt-Clay

Min: 5.10

Max: 7.30

Min: 0.60

Max: 2.00

50%), Lean Clay

limit less than

Clays (liquid

SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED

Soils.

200), Clayey

passing No.

than 35 pct.

Materials (more

 1 0 inches 9 inches silt loam Silt-Clay

Soil Layer Information 

Boundary Classification

Permeability

Rate (in/hr)

Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction

(pH)

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY 
TC2800629.2s Page A-6

 E20 ILSG10000196689 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SW

 D19 P34435 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSW

 F18 ILSG10000196833 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SW

 E17 ILSG10000196747 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SW

 D16 ILSG10000197040 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSW

 C15 P34431 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SW

 14 ILSG10000196800 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SE

 C13 ILSG10000196852 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SW

 12 ILSG10000196801 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSW

 11 P34432 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNW

 A10 ILSG10000196796 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSE

 B9 P13006 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSW

 B8 ILSG10000196803 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSW

 7 ILSG10000196794 1/4 - 1/2 Mile South

 6 ILSG10000197572 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNW

 A5 ILSG10000196886 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSE

 4 ILSG10000196984 1/8 - 1/4 Mile SW

 3 P13004 1/8 - 1/4 Mile NNE

 2 ILSG10000196900 1/8 - 1/4 Mile SSW

 1 ILSG10000197019 1/8 - 1/4 Mile South

STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION

LOCATION

MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP

Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.

 O80 IL0895185 1/2 - 1 Mile WSW

FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION

LOCATION

MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP

 S79 USGS2383327 1/2 - 1 Mile WSW

FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION

LOCATION

MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP

State Database 1.000

Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile

Federal USGS 1.000

WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION

DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)

opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.

professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an

EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental

LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY 
TC2800629.2s Page A-7

 R72 P13011 1/2 - 1 Mile South

 R71 P13013 1/2 - 1 Mile South

 R70 P13008 1/2 - 1 Mile South

 R69 P13010 1/2 - 1 Mile South

 Q68 P13002 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE

 M67 ILSG10000197432 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE

 P66 ILSG10000198051 1/2 - 1 Mile NW

 O65 ILSG10000196837 1/2 - 1 Mile WSW

 64 ILSG10000197960 1/2 - 1 Mile NW

 63 ILSG10000197344 1/2 - 1 Mile West

 62 ILSG10000197033 1/2 - 1 Mile West

 L61 P34565 1/2 - 1 Mile WSW

 N60 P34429 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW

 N59 P34427 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW

 N58 P34430 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW

 N57 P34428 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW

 M56 ILSG10000197429 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE

 55 ILEP10000005320 1/2 - 1 Mile SW

 L54 ILSG10000196675 1/2 - 1 Mile WSW

 L53 ILSG10000196674 1/2 - 1 Mile WSW

 L52 ILEP10000005336 1/2 - 1 Mile WSW

 L51 ILEP10000005331 1/2 - 1 Mile WSW

 K50 ILSG10000197440 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW

 K49 ILSG10000197439 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW

 48 ILSG10000197647 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW

 47 P13001 1/2 - 1 Mile East

 46 P34439 1/2 - 1 Mile NW

 45 ILSG10000198031 1/2 - 1 Mile NNE

 J44 P34561 1/2 - 1 Mile SW

 J43 P34560 1/2 - 1 Mile SW

 42 P34444 1/2 - 1 Mile West

 41 P34443 1/2 - 1 Mile West

 40 ILSG10000197736 1/2 - 1 Mile NE

 39 P13005 1/2 - 1 Mile North

 38 ILSG10000198074 1/2 - 1 Mile North

 I37 ILSG10000197716 1/2 - 1 Mile NW

 36 P34438 1/2 - 1 Mile NW

 35 ILSG10000196697 1/2 - 1 Mile SW

 I34 ILSG10000197652 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW

 G33 ILSG10000197654 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW

 H32 ILSG10000196491 1/2 - 1 Mile SSW

 H31 ILSG10000196521 1/2 - 1 Mile SSW

 G30 ILSG10000197657 1/2 - 1 Mile NW

 29 P34433 1/2 - 1 Mile NW

 G28 P34437 1/2 - 1 Mile NW

 G27 P34436 1/2 - 1 Mile NW

 26 P34434 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSW

 25 ILSG10000197667 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NW

 24 ILSG10000197721 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NW

 F23 ILSG10000196845 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSW

 F22 ILSG10000196844 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSW

 F21 ILEP10000005341 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SW

STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION

LOCATION

MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY 
TC2800629.2s Page A-8

 120 ILSG10000195754 1/2 - 1 Mile South

 119 ILSG10000196146 1/2 - 1 Mile SW

 118 ILSG10000197068 1/2 - 1 Mile West

 117 P13003 1/2 - 1 Mile NE

 X116 P34447 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW

 115 ILSG10000198333 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW

 X114 ILSG10000197678 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW

 W113 ILSG10000197290 1/2 - 1 Mile West

 112 ILSG10000195936 1/2 - 1 Mile SSW

 U111 ILSG10000197256 1/2 - 1 Mile West

 110 ILSG10000197584 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE

 U109 ILSG10000197222 1/2 - 1 Mile West

 X108 ILSG10000197601 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW

 107 P34563 1/2 - 1 Mile SW

 106 P34564 1/2 - 1 Mile SW

 W105 ILSG10000197292 1/2 - 1 Mile West

 U104 ILSG10000197242 1/2 - 1 Mile West

 U103 ILSG10000197223 1/2 - 1 Mile West

 102 ILSG10000195932 1/2 - 1 Mile SSW

 101 P34445 1/2 - 1 Mile West

 V100 ILSG10000196580 1/2 - 1 Mile ESE

 W99 P34446 1/2 - 1 Mile West

 98 ILSG10000198240 1/2 - 1 Mile NW

 V97 P13030 1/2 - 1 Mile ESE

 U96 ILSG10000197191 1/2 - 1 Mile West

 Q95 ILSG10000197827 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE

 94 P13000 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE

 S93 P34568 1/2 - 1 Mile WSW

 S92 P34569 1/2 - 1 Mile WSW

 P91 P34440 1/2 - 1 Mile NW

 P90 P34442 1/2 - 1 Mile NW

 P89 P34441 1/2 - 1 Mile NW

 P88 ILSG10000198098 1/2 - 1 Mile NW

 87 ILEP10000005416 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW

 86 ILSG10000195952 1/2 - 1 Mile South

 S85 ILSG10000196672 1/2 - 1 Mile WSW

 S84 ILSG10000196671 1/2 - 1 Mile WSW

 S83 ILSG10000196670 1/2 - 1 Mile WSW

 T82 ILSG10000197712 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW

 T81 ILSG10000197711 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW

 78 ILSG10000196157 1/2 - 1 Mile SSW

 S77 ILSG10000196700 1/2 - 1 Mile WSW

 76 ILSG10000197309 1/2 - 1 Mile East

 S75 ILEP10000005338 1/2 - 1 Mile WSW

 R74 P13009 1/2 - 1 Mile South

 R73 P13012 1/2 - 1 Mile South

STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION

LOCATION

MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY 
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.

7 20

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

7

20

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

720

7

2 0

7 2 0

7 2

0

7 20 7 20

7 2 0

6 8 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 20

7

20

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 20

7 2 0

7 20

7 20

7 2

7 2 0 7 2 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

7

2 0

7 20

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

7 2 0

6

6 8 0

6 8 0

IL
TC2800629.2s Page A-10

Driller: BECK

Record Type: Affidavit

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: --

Section: 18 Plot Location: Not Reported

Township: 38N Range: 09E

County Code: 043 County: DUPAGE

Depth (in feet): 100 Aquifer Type: --

Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 10/27/1985

Owner: JAMES VOJCEK

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 181816 Second ID: Not Reported

3

NNE

1/8 - 1/4 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P13004

Site id: ILSG10000196900

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 75

Status: ENG Elevation: 714

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: IL Dept. of Transportation

Rdir: E Farm name: Aurora East Water Treatment Pl

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 18 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.769433

Longitude: -88.259399

Api number: 120433000400

2

SSW

1/8 - 1/4 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000196900

Site id: ILSG10000197019

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 20

Status: ENG Elevation: 716

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: IL Dept. of Transportation

Rdir: E Farm name: Aurora East Water Treatment Pl

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 18 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.77055

Longitude: -88.258664

Api number: 120433000300

1

South

1/8 - 1/4 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197019

Map ID

Direction

Distance

Elevation Database EDR ID Number

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-11

Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 290

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 630

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Gaffke, George E.

Rdir: E Farm name: Aurora Venture

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 18 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.776515

Longitude: -88.26029

Api number: 120433113900

6

NNW

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197572

Site id: ILSG10000196886

Wfmto: 200 Pumpgpm: 7

Wformation: rock Wfmfrom: 60

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 200

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Knierim, James

Rdir: E Farm name: Metropolitan Management Co.

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 18 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.769313

Longitude: -88.255457

Api number: 120432501800

A5

SSE

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILSG10000196886

Site id: ILSG10000196984

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 20

Status: ENG Elevation: 713

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: IL Dept. of Transportation

Rdir: E Farm name: Aurora East Water Treatment Pl

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 18 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.770214

Longitude: -88.261682

Api number: 120433000200

4

SW

1/8 - 1/4 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILSG10000196984

Map ID

Direction

Distance

Elevation Database EDR ID Number

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-12

Driller: KNIERIM

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Commercial Well Type: --

Section: 18 Plot Location: 5A

Township: 38N Range: 09E

County Code: 043 County: DUPAGE

Depth (in feet): 200 Aquifer Type: Bedrock

Permit: 056292 Date Drilled: 01/13/1977

Owner: METROPOLITAN MANAGEMENT CO

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 181818 Second ID: Not Reported

B9

SSW

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS P13006

Site id: ILSG10000196803

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 40

Status: ENG Elevation: 709

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: IL Dept. of Transportation

Rdir: E Farm name: Aurora East Water Treatment Pl

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 18 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.76859

Longitude: -88.260283

Api number: 120433000100

B8

SSW

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILSG10000196803

Site id: ILSG10000196794

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 11

Status: ENG Elevation: 708

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: IL Dept. of Transportation

Rdir: E Farm name: Aurora East Water Treatment Pl

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 18 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.768425

Longitude: -88.257558

Api number: 120433000500

7

South

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000196794

Site id: ILSG10000197572

Wfmto: 630 Pumpgpm: 0

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-13

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 40

Status: ENG Elevation: 712

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: IL Dept. of Transportation

Rdir: E Farm name: Aurora East Water Treatment Pl

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 18 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.768559

Longitude: -88.261793

Api number: 120433000000

12

SSW

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILSG10000196801

Driller: NEELY

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: ~~

Section: 13 Plot Location: 1D

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 155 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: M110990 Date Drilled: 01/13/1984

Owner: GARY BOREN

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066114 Second ID: Not Reported

11

WNW

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34432

Site id: ILSG10000196796

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 11

Status: ENG Elevation: 707

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: IL Dept. of Transportation

Rdir: E Farm name: Aurora East Water Treatment Pl

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 18 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.768468

Longitude: -88.255351

Api number: 120433000600

A10

SSE

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILSG10000196796

Map ID

Direction

Distance

Elevation Database EDR ID Number

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-14

Driller: GELTZ

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: IN Well Type: ~~

Section: 13 Plot Location: 1A

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 137 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: M017405 Date Drilled: 04/28/1972

Owner: MASONRY SYSTEMS OF ILL

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066113 Second ID: Not Reported

C15

SW

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS P34431

Site id: ILSG10000196800

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 11

Status: ENG Elevation: 710

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: IL Dept. of Transportation

Rdir: E Farm name: Aurora East Water Treatment Pl

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 18 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.768512

Longitude: -88.253141

Api number: 120433000700

14

SE

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000196800

Site id: ILSG10000196852

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 137

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: 1 Company na: Geltz, N. H.

Rdir: E Farm name: Masonry Systems of Ill.

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.769161

Longitude: -88.263546

Api number: 120890141000

C13

SW

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILSG10000196852

Site id: ILSG10000196801

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-15

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 150

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: 1 Company na: Geltz, N. H.

Rdir: E Farm name: Aurora Precast Cncrt

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.768899

Longitude: -88.265104

Api number: 120892284100

F18

SW

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILSG10000196833

Site id: ILSG10000196747

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 125

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Sission, Edward H.

Rdir: E Farm name: Valley Volkswagon

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 24 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.767817

Longitude: -88.263073

Api number: 120890136000

E17

SW

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000196747

Site id: ILSG10000197040

Wfmto: 100 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: rock Wfmfrom: 40

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 100

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Knierim, Phil

Rdir: E Farm name: Eola Warehousing

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.770931

Longitude: -88.265951

Api number: 120893077200

D16

WSW

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILSG10000197040

Map ID

Direction

Distance

Elevation Database EDR ID Number

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-16

Pws status: Not Reported Sdwis well: Not Reported

Y coord: 3181960.25

X coord: 3335435

Amb well: 0

W aquifer: Not Reported

W d depth: 0

W min setb: 0

W suscept: Not Reported W policy: Not Reported

W cws name: Not Reported W status: Not Reported

Well id: 08900 W cws num: Not Reported

F21

SW

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILEP10000005341

Site id: ILSG10000196689

Wfmto: 300 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 92

Elevref: GL Total dept: 300

Status: WATER Elevation: 715

Farm num: 2 Company na: Neeley, Harry C.

Rdir: E Farm name: DuKane Precast Inc.

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 24 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.767336

Longitude: -88.263527

Api number: 120893069300

E20

SW

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000196689

Driller: KNIERIM

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: --

Section: 13 Plot Location: 2B

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 100 Aquifer Type: Bedrock

Permit: 089-0578-92 Date Drilled: 11/06/1992

Owner: EOLA WARCHOUSING

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 241023 Second ID: Not Reported

D19

WSW

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS P34435

Site id: ILSG10000196833

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-17

Site id: ILSG10000196845

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: yellow & white lime Wfmfrom: 125

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 160

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Brown, Darwin

Rdir: E Farm name: Bach Building Systems

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.769103

Longitude: -88.265944

Api number: 120893341500

F23

WSW

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILSG10000196845

Site id: ILSG10000196844

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 0

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Not Reported

Rdir: E Farm name: Alliance Metal Treating

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.769103

Longitude: -88.265944

Api number: 120893457800

F22

WSW

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILSG10000196844

Updt ts: 09/14/2006 Site id: ILEP10000005341

Range: 8E Section: 13

Meridian: 3 Township: 38N

Long dec d: -88.265

Lat dec de: 41.76833

Pop cnt: 0

Fed type c: NP B name: INDUSTRIAL/AGRICULTURAL

Prn cnty: Kane Status cd: I

Zip code: 60505 Fips cd: 89

City name: AURORA State code: IL

Addr two t: Not Reported

Addr one t: 1900 PLAIN AVE

Facility n: IL3066340

Fac name: NITREX INC CHICAGO OPERATIONS

Cwswell merg are: 0

Sys number: Not Reported Api: Not Reported

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-18

Driller: GELTZ

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: IN Well Type: ~~

Section: 13 Plot Location: 2A

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 150 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: M043201 Date Drilled: 11/19/1975

Owner: AURORA PRECAST CONCRETE INC

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066116 Second ID: Not Reported

26

WSW

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS P34434

Site id: ILSG10000197667

Wfmto: 320 Pumpgpm: 5

Wformation: dolomite Wfmfrom: 300

Elevref: GL Total dept: 320

Status: WATER Elevation: 720

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Neely, Mark S.

Rdir: E Farm name: Bohr, Don

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.777407

Longitude: -88.265031

Api number: 120892694000

25

NW

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197667

Site id: ILSG10000197721

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 132

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: 1 Company na: Geltz, N. H.

Rdir: E Farm name: Friedens Donald

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.778299

Longitude: -88.263557

Api number: 120892222600

24

NW

1/4 - 1/2 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197721

Map ID

Direction

Distance

Elevation Database EDR ID Number

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-19

Driller: GELTZ

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: ~~

Section: 13 Plot Location: 1F

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 132 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: M030283 Date Drilled: 06/06/1974

Owner: DONALD J FRIEDERS

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066115 Second ID: Not Reported

29

NW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34433

Driller: NEELY

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: ~~

Section: 13 Plot Location: 2E

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 320 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: M123959 Date Drilled: 05/23/1986

Owner: DON BOHR

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066118 Second ID: 26940

G28

NW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34437

Driller: NEELY

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: ~~

Section: 13 Plot Location: 2E

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 205 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: M007579 Date Drilled: 06/04/1969

Owner: GLEN THUOT

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066117 Second ID: Not Reported

G27

NW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34436

Map ID

Direction

Distance

Elevation Database EDR ID Number

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-20

Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 170

Status: WATER Elevation: 730

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Neely, Mark S.

Rdir: E Farm name: Mandel, Harvey

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 24 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.765097

Longitude: -88.262659

Api number: 120892896800

H32

SSW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000196491

Site id: ILSG10000196521

Wfmto: 205 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 120

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 205

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: 1 Company na: Fykes, Charles N.

Rdir: E Farm name: Wil-Fred

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 24 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.765519

Longitude: -88.263502

Api number: 120892984000

H31

SSW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000196521

Site id: ILSG10000197657

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 205

Status: WATER Elevation: 675

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Neely, Paul C.

Rdir: E Farm name: Thuott Glen

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.7773

Longitude: -88.267195

Api number: 120890055900

G30

NW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197657

Map ID

Direction

Distance

Elevation Database EDR ID Number

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-21

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 160

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Knierim Company, Inc.

Rdir: E Farm name: J N Abens Const

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 24 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.767457

Longitude: -88.267852

Api number: 120892348000

35

SW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000196697

Site id: ILSG10000197652

Wfmto: 170 Pumpgpm: 10

Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 74

Elevref: GL Total dept: 0

Status: WATER Elevation: 720

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Pitz, John W.

Rdir: E Farm name: Hauser, Elmer

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.777247

Longitude: -88.268234

Api number: 120892663800

I34

WNW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197652

Site id: ILSG10000197654

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 10

Wformation: lime Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 155

Status: WATER Elevation: 720

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Neely, Mark S.

Rdir: E Farm name: Boren, Gary

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.777257

Longitude: -88.267866

Api number: 120892895500

G33

WNW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197654

Site id: ILSG10000196491

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 30

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-22

Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 88

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 145

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: 1 Company na: Fykes, Charles N.

Rdir: E Farm name: Vojeck, Jim & Dianne

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 18 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.781981

Longitude: -88.260275

Api number: 120432721700

38

North

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000198074

Site id: ILSG10000197716

Wfmto: 180 Pumpgpm: 12

Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 65

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 180

Status: WATER Elevation: 710

Farm num: 1 Company na: Neely, Mark S.

Rdir: E Farm name: Gonnerman, Steve

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.778183

Longitude: -88.268413

Api number: 120893511900

I37

NW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197716

Driller: K AND K

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: ~~

Section: 13 Plot Location: 2F

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 360 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: M083291 Date Drilled: 01/10/1979

Owner: RICHARD HEIMNAN

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066119 Second ID: Not Reported

36

NW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34438

Site id: ILSG10000196697

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-23

Driller: LAYNE-WESTERN

Record Type: Affidavit

Well Use: IN Well Type: ~~

Section: 13 Plot Location: 4C

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 1385 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 00/00/0000

Owner: BURLINGTON NORTHERN

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066124 Second ID: Not Reported

41

West

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34443

Site id: ILSG10000197736

Wfmto: 200 Pumpgpm: 15

Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 117

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 200

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Pitz, John W.

Rdir: E Farm name: Xinos, Bill

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 18 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.778381

Longitude: -88.248136

Api number: 120433017800

40

NE

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197736

Driller: LAYNE WESTERN

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Irrigation Well Type: --

Section: 18 Plot Location: 4H

Township: 38N Range: 09E

County Code: 043 County: DUPAGE

Depth (in feet): 345 Aquifer Type: Bedrock

Permit: 139046 Date Drilled: 06/20/1988

Owner: AURORA VENTURE GOLF COURSE

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 181817 Second ID: 28168

39

North

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P13005

Site id: ILSG10000198074

Wfmto: 145 Pumpgpm: 12

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-24

Driller: FYKES

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Industrial/Commercial Well Type: --

Section: 24 Plot Location: 1G

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 205 Aquifer Type: Bedrock

Permit: 017412 Date Drilled: 04/28/1990

Owner: WIL-FRED #1

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 174138 Second ID: Not Reported

J44

SW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34561

Driller: NEELY

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: ~~

Section: 24 Plot Location: 1G

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 170 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: M095007 Date Drilled: 07/23/1980

Owner: HARVEY MANDEL

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066181 Second ID: Not Reported

J43

SW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34560

Driller: NEELY

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: ~~

Section: 13 Plot Location: 4D

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 200 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: M119962 Date Drilled: 08/28/1985

Owner: ROBERT MICHALSKI

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066125 Second ID: 26689

42

West

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34444

Map ID

Direction

Distance

Elevation Database EDR ID Number

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-25

Driller: GELTZ

Record Type: Affidavit

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: --

Section: 17 Plot Location: 8D

Township: 38N Range: 09E

County Code: 043 County: DUPAGE

Depth (in feet): 102 Aquifer Type: Bedrock

Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 07/18/1987

Owner: AURORA VENTURE

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 181813 Second ID: Not Reported

47

East

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P13001

Driller: Not Reported

Record Type: Affidavit

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: ~~

Section: 13 Plot Location: 3F

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 71 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 00/00/0000

Owner: ROBERT MICHALSKI

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066120 Second ID: Not Reported

46

NW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34439

Site id: ILSG10000198031

Wfmto: 345 Pumpgpm: 570

Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 118

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 345

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: 1 Company na: Neupert, Thomas A.

Rdir: E Farm name: Venture, Aurora

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 18 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.781485

Longitude: -88.252403

Api number: 120432816800

45

NNE

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000198031

Map ID

Direction

Distance

Elevation Database EDR ID Number

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-26

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 1410

Status: WATER Elevation: 695

Farm num: 3 Company na: Western W Scraper Co

Rdir: E Farm name: Not Reported

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.775358

Longitude: -88.272021

Api number: 120890065500

K50

WNW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197440

Site id: ILSG10000197439

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 107

Status: WATER Elevation: 710

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Neely&Schimelpfening

Rdir: E Farm name: Sherman Earl James

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.775358

Longitude: -88.272021

Api number: 120890065700

K49

WNW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197439

Site id: ILSG10000197647

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 20

Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 200

Status: WATER Elevation: 725

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Neely, Mark S.

Rdir: E Farm name: Michalski, Robert

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.777185

Longitude: -88.270813

Api number: 120892668900

48

WNW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197647

Map ID

Direction

Distance

Elevation Database EDR ID Number

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-27

Lat dec de: 41.76778

Pop cnt: 80

Fed type c: NTNC B name: INDUSTRIAL/AGRICULTURAL

Prn cnty: Kane Status cd: A

Zip code: 60505 Fips cd: 89

City name: AURORA State code: IL

Addr two t: Not Reported

Addr one t: 625 CRANE STREET

Facility n: IL3066605

Fac name: DUR-O-WALL NORTH WELL

Cwswell merg are: 0

Sys number: Not Reported Api: Not Reported

Pws status: Not Reported Sdwis well: Not Reported

Y coord: 3181703.75

X coord: 3333840.5

Amb well: 0

W aquifer: Not Reported

W d depth: 0

W min setb: 0

W suscept: Not Reported W policy: Not Reported

W cws name: Not Reported W status: Not Reported

Well id: 08901 W cws num: Not Reported

L52

WSW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILEP10000005336

Updt ts: 09/21/2006 Site id: ILEP10000005331

Range: 8E Section: 24

Meridian: 3 Township: 38N

Long dec d: -88.27028

Lat dec de: 41.76722

Pop cnt: 80

Fed type c: NTNC B name: INDUSTRIAL/AGRICULTURAL

Prn cnty: Kane Status cd: A

Zip code: 60505 Fips cd: 89

City name: AURORA State code: IL

Addr two t: Not Reported

Addr one t: 625 CRANE STREET

Facility n: IL3066613

Fac name: DUR-O-WAL EAST WELL

Cwswell merg are: 0

Sys number: Not Reported Api: Not Reported

Pws status: Not Reported Sdwis well: Not Reported

Y coord: 3181494.25

X coord: 3333979

Amb well: 0

W aquifer: Not Reported

W d depth: 0

W min setb: 0

W suscept: Not Reported W policy: Not Reported

W cws name: Not Reported W status: Not Reported

Well id: 08901 W cws num: Not Reported

L51

WSW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILEP10000005331

Site id: ILSG10000197440

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-28

Pws status: Not Reported Sdwis well: Not Reported

Y coord: 3180853

X coord: 3334374.25

Amb well: 0

W aquifer: Not Reported

W d depth: 0

W min setb: 0

W suscept: Not Reported W policy: Not Reported

W cws name: Not Reported W status: Not Reported

Well id: 08902 W cws num: Not Reported

55

SW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILEP10000005320

Site id: ILSG10000196675

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 200

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: 1 Company na: Geltz, N. H.

Rdir: E Farm name: Dur-O-Wal Of Ill

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 24 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.767172

Longitude: -88.270729

Api number: 120890099700

L54

WSW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000196675

Site id: ILSG10000196674

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 308

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: 2 Company na: Geltz, N. H.

Rdir: E Farm name: Dur-O-Wal of Ill.

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 24 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.767172

Longitude: -88.270729

Api number: 120890116200

L53

WSW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000196674

Updt ts: 09/21/2006 Site id: ILEP10000005336

Range: 8E Section: 24

Meridian: 3 Township: 38N

Long dec d: -88.27083

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-29

N58

WNW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34430

Driller: NEELY-SCHIMELPFENIG

Record Type: Geology,Any other type of record

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: ~~

Section: 13 Plot Location: Not Reported

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 107 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 00/00/1942

Owner: EARL JAMES SHERMAN

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066112 Second ID: Not Reported

N57

WNW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34428

Site id: ILSG10000197429

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 200

Status: WATER Elevation: 715

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: No Company

Rdir: E Farm name: Reber Preserving Co

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 17 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.775283

Longitude: -88.243896

Api number: 120430000100

M56

ENE

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197429

Updt ts: 09/18/2006 Site id: ILEP10000005320

Range: 8E Section: 24

Meridian: 3 Township: 38N

Long dec d: -88.26889

Lat dec de: 41.76528

Pop cnt: 0

Fed type c: NP B name: SCHOOL

Prn cnty: Kane Status cd: I

Zip code: 60505 Fips cd: 89

City name: AURORA State code: IL

Addr two t: Not Reported

Addr one t: 1934 LIBERTY ROAD

Facility n: IL3075044

Fac name: JOHNSON ELEM SCHOOL DIST #131

Cwswell merg are: 0

Sys number: Not Reported Api: Not Reported

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-30

L61

WSW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34565

Driller: Not Reported

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Commercial Well Type: ~~

Section: 13 Plot Location: Not Reported

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 1461 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 00/00/1946

Owner: WESTERN AUSTIN

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 071953 Second ID: Not Reported

N60

WNW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34429

Driller: Not Reported

Record Type: Chemical Analysis

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: ~~

Section: 13 Plot Location: Not Reported

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 98 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 00/00/0000

Owner: DONALD BOHR

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066111 Second ID: Not Reported

N59

WNW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34427

Driller: J.BRICKEY

Record Type: Affidavit

Well Use: School Well Type: --

Section: 13 Plot Location: Not Reported

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 60 Aquifer Type: --

Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 11/08/1991

Owner: NAT. COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 222451 Second ID: Not Reported

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-31

64

NW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197960

Site id: ILSG10000197344

Wfmto: 780 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: sandstone Wfmfrom: 580

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 780

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Kerry, Charles

Rdir: E Farm name: Sparkling Springs

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.774414

Longitude: -88.27322

Api number: 120893203700

63

West

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197344

Site id: ILSG10000197033

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: rock Wfmfrom: 90

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 120

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Brown, Darwin

Rdir: E Farm name: Partida-Cuevas, Abel

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.770764

Longitude: -88.273168

Api number: 120893503100

62

West

1/2 - 1 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILSG10000197033

Driller: KNIERIM

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: ~~

Section: 24 Plot Location: 3H

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 160 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: M062024 Date Drilled: 06/15/1977

Owner: J N ABENS CONST CO

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066185 Second ID: Not Reported

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-32

M67

ENE

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197432

Site id: ILSG10000198051

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 121

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: 1 Company na: Geltz, N. H.

Rdir: E Farm name: Popp Jina

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.781839

Longitude: -88.268438

Api number: 120890040900

P66

NW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000198051

Site id: ILSG10000196837

Wfmto: 700 Pumpgpm: 12

Wformation: sandstone Wfmfrom: 660

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 700

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: 1 Company na: William Knierim

Rdir: E Farm name: Fidler, Brenda S.

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.768939

Longitude: -88.273142

Api number: 120893593500

O65

WSW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILSG10000196837

Site id: ILSG10000197960

Wfmto: 100 Pumpgpm: 12

Wformation: rock Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 100

Status: WATER Elevation: 725

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Ward, Delbert G.

Rdir: E Farm name: Kobulnicky, Henry

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.780514

Longitude: -88.269891

Api number: 120892895600

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-33

R70

South

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P13008

Driller: B L PALMER

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Not Reported Well Type: --

Section: 19 Plot Location: Not Reported

Township: 38N Range: 09E

County Code: 043 County: DUPAGE

Depth (in feet): 205 Aquifer Type: Bedrock

Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 00/00/0000

Owner: Not Reported

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 174934 Second ID: Not Reported

R69

South

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P13010

Driller: HAROLD N POHL

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: --

Section: 17 Plot Location: 8F

Township: 38N Range: 09E

County Code: 043 County: DUPAGE

Depth (in feet): 144 Aquifer Type: Bedrock

Permit: 009933 Date Drilled: 07/01/1970

Owner: D HAIAR

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 181814 Second ID: Not Reported

Q68

ENE

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P13002

Site id: ILSG10000197432

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 1428

Status: WATER Elevation: 714

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Geiger, S. B. Co.

Rdir: E Farm name: C B & Q Rr Company

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 17 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.775295

Longitude: -88.242702

Api number: 120430159500

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-34

R73

South

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P13012

Driller: K & K WELL DRILLING

Record Type: Affidavit

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: --

Section: 19 Plot Location: Not Reported

Township: 38N Range: 09E

County Code: 043 County: DUPAGE

Depth (in feet): 100 Aquifer Type: --

Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 03/09/1988

Owner: STONINGTON DEVELOPMENT

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 181820 Second ID: Not Reported

R72

South

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P13011

Driller: P KNIERIM

unusual

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology,Indicates comment in owner’s field something

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: --

Section: 19 Plot Location: Not Reported

Township: 38N Range: 09E

County Code: 043 County: DUPAGE

Depth (in feet): 200 Aquifer Type: Bedrock

Permit: 102686 Date Drilled: 02/23/1982

Owner: DONALD NICOLE LOT 9

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 181822 Second ID: Not Reported

R71

South

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P13013

Driller: BL PALMER

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Not Reported Well Type: --

Section: 19 Plot Location: Not Reported

Township: 38N Range: 09E

County Code: 043 County: DUPAGE

Depth (in feet): 105 Aquifer Type: Bedrock

Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 00/00/0000

Owner: Not Reported

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 174932 Second ID: Not Reported

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-35

Lat dec de: 0

Pop cnt: 0

Fed type c: Not Reported B name: Not Reported

Prn cnty: Not Reported Status cd: Not Reported

Zip code: Not Reported Fips cd: Not Reported

City name: Not Reported State code: Not Reported

Addr two t: Not Reported

Addr one t: Not Reported

Facility n: Not Reported

Fac name: Not Reported

Cwswell merg are: 0

Sys number: IL0895185 Api: 120893436700

Pws status: A Sdwis well: WL20031

Y coord: 3333253

X coord: 3333253

Amb well: 0

W aquifer: 5050

W d depth: 169

W min setb: 400

W suscept: C2 W policy: U

W cws name: DEARBORN MHP W status: A

Well id: 20031 W cws num: 0895185

S75

WSW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILEP10000005338

Driller: B L PALMER

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Not Reported Well Type: --

Section: 19 Plot Location: Not Reported

Township: 38N Range: 09E

County Code: 043 County: DUPAGE

Depth (in feet): 110 Aquifer Type: Bedrock

Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 00/00/0000

Owner: Not Reported

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 174933 Second ID: Not Reported

R74

South

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P13009

Driller: AUGUSTYNIAK

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: --

Section: 19 Plot Location: Not Reported

Township: 38N Range: 09E

County Code: 043 County: DUPAGE

Depth (in feet): 150 Aquifer Type: Bedrock

Permit: 003379 Date Drilled: 08/31/1967

Owner: HENRY F GROESCH

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 181821 Second ID: Not Reported

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-36

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 141

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: 1 Company na: Geltz, N. H.

Rdir: E Farm name: Gongalez Amon

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 24 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.76183

Longitude: -88.265858

Api number: 120890147700

78

SSW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000196157

Site id: ILSG10000196700

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 115

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Layne-Western

Rdir: E Farm name: City of Aurora Pioneer Park

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 24 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.767474

Longitude: -88.273058

Api number: 120892616200

S77

WSW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILSG10000196700

Site id: ILSG10000197309

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 166

Status: WATER Elevation: 718

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Archibald, E. C.

Rdir: E Farm name: C B & Q Rr

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 17 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.773983

Longitude: -88.242097

Api number: 120430159400

76

East

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197309

Updt ts: 12/30/1899 Site id: ILEP10000005338

Range: Not Reported Section: Not Reported

Meridian: Not Reported Township: Not Reported

Long dec d: 0

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-37

Treatment objective: disinfection

Facility type: Storage Treatment process: hypochlorination, post

Facility name: DISTRIBUTION PRESSURE STORAGE

Facility id: 13426

Status: Active Owner type: Private

Pws type: CWS

PWS Source: Groundwater

Population Served: 26 Pwssvcconn: 14

Pws name: DEARBORN MHP

State: IL County: Kane

Pwsid: IL0895185 Epa region: 05

O80

WSW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Lower

FRDS PWS IL0895185

Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 0

Ground water data count: 0

Ground water data begin date: 0000-00-00 Ground water data end date: 0000-00-00

Water quality data end date:1986-09-24 Water quality data count: 1

Peak flow data count: 0 Water quality data begin date: 1986-09-24

Peak flow data begin date: 0000-00-00 Peak flow data end date: 0000-00-00

Daily flow data end date: 0000-00-00 Daily flow data count: 0

Real time data flag: 0 Daily flow data begin date: 0000-00-00

Project number: 441706200

Source of depth data: other government (other than USGS)

Well depth: 169 Hole depth: Not Reported

Aquifer: SILURIAN SYSTEM

Aquifer Type: Not Reported

Type of ground water site: Single well, other than collector or Ranney type

Local standard time flag: N

Date inventoried: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: CST

Site type: Ground-water other than Spring Date construction: Not Reported

Topographic: Flat surface

Hydrologic: Lower Fox. Illinois. Area = 1090 sq.mi.

Altitude datum: National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929

Altitude accuracy: Not Reported

Altitude method: Interpolated from topographic map

Altitude: 705

Location map: AURORA NORTH Map scale: 24000

Country: US Land net: NENENWS24 T 38N R 3E 3

State: 17 County: 089

Dec latlong datum: NAD83 District: 17

Coor accr: F Latlong datum: NAD27

Dec lon: -88.27340371 Coor meth: M

Longitude: 0881624 Dec lat: 41.767807

Latitude: 414604 EDR Site id: USGS2383327

Site name: 38N 8E-24.5h1

Agency cd: USGS Site no: 414604088162401

S79

WSW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Lower

FED USGS USGS2383327

Site id: ILSG10000196157

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-38

Treatment objective: disinfection

Facility type: Distribution_system_zone Treatment process: hypochlorination, post

Facility name: DEARBORN MHP

Facility id: 24035

Status: Active Owner type: Private

Pws type: CWS

PWS Source: Groundwater

Population Served: 26 Pwssvcconn: 14

Pws name: DEARBORN MHP

State: IL County: Kane

Pwsid: IL0895185 Epa region: 05

Contact zip: 60522

Contact city: HINSDALE

Contact address2: Not Reported

Contact phone: 630-920-8350 Contact address1: PO BOX 309

Original name: DRESLER, STANLEY

Contact name: DRESLER, STANLEY

Treatment objective: disinfection

Facility type: Well Treatment process: hypochlorination, post

Facility name: WELL 1 (20031)

Facility id: 19748

Status: Active Owner type: Private

Pws type: CWS

PWS Source: Groundwater

Population Served: 26 Pwssvcconn: 14

Pws name: DEARBORN MHP

State: IL County: Kane

Pwsid: IL0895185 Epa region: 05

Contact zip: 60522

Contact city: HINSDALE

Contact address2: Not Reported

Contact phone: 630-920-8350 Contact address1: PO BOX 309

Original name: DRESLER, STANLEY

Contact name: DRESLER, STANLEY

Treatment objective: disinfection

Facility type: Treatment_plant Treatment process: hypochlorination, post

Facility name: TP 01-TREATMENT

Facility id: 15841

Status: Active Owner type: Private

Pws type: CWS

PWS Source: Groundwater

Population Served: 26 Pwssvcconn: 14

Pws name: DEARBORN MHP

State: IL County: Kane

Pwsid: IL0895185 Epa region: 05

Contact zip: 60522

Contact city: HINSDALE

Contact address2: Not Reported

Contact phone: 630-920-8350 Contact address1: PO BOX 309

Original name: DRESLER, STANLEY

Contact name: DRESLER, STANLEY

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-39

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: NITRATE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: 000

Vio. beginning Date: 01/01/93 Vio. end Date: 12/31/93 Vio. Period: 012 Months

Violation ID: 9322835 Source ID: 000 PWS Phone: Not Reported

VIOLATIONS INFORMATION:

PWS currently has or had major violation(s) or enforcement: YES

Treatment Class: Treated Population: 32

City Served: AURORA

Facility Latitude: 41 46 5.0000 Facility Longitude: 88 16 25.0000

Addressee / Facility: Not Reported

AURORA, IL 60566

PWS Name: DEARBORN MHP

Date Initiated: Not Reported Date Deactivated: Not Reported

PWS ID: IL0895185

Contact zip: 60522

Contact city: HINSDALE

Contact address2: Not Reported

Contact phone: 630-920-8350 Contact address1: PO BOX 309

Original name: DRESLER, STANLEY

Contact name: DRESLER, STANLEY

Treatment objective: disinfection

Facility type: Sampling_station Treatment process: hypochlorination, post

Facility name: GENERIC RAW SAMPLING STATION

Facility id: 30116

Status: Active Owner type: Private

Pws type: CWS

PWS Source: Groundwater

Population Served: 26 Pwssvcconn: 14

Pws name: DEARBORN MHP

State: IL County: Kane

Pwsid: IL0895185 Epa region: 05

Contact zip: 60522

Contact city: HINSDALE

Contact address2: Not Reported

Contact phone: 630-920-8350 Contact address1: PO BOX 309

Original name: DRESLER, STANLEY

Contact name: DRESLER, STANLEY

Treatment objective: disinfection

Facility type: Sampling_station Treatment process: hypochlorination, post

Facility name: GENERIC FINISHED SAMPLING STATION

Facility id: 27694

Status: Active Owner type: Private

Pws type: CWS

PWS Source: Groundwater

Population Served: 26 Pwssvcconn: 14

Pws name: DEARBORN MHP

State: IL County: Kane

Pwsid: IL0895185 Epa region: 05

Contact zip: 60522

Contact city: HINSDALE

Contact address2: Not Reported

Contact phone: 630-920-8350 Contact address1: PO BOX 309

Original name: DRESLER, STANLEY

Contact name: DRESLER, STANLEY

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-40

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: ETHYLBENZENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: 000

Vio. beginning Date: 04/01/94 Vio. end Date: 06/30/94 Vio. Period: 003 Months

Violation ID: 9424564 Source ID: 000 PWS Phone: Not Reported

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: STYRENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: 000

Vio. beginning Date: 04/01/94 Vio. end Date: 06/30/94 Vio. Period: 003 Months

Violation ID: 9424565 Source ID: 000 PWS Phone: Not Reported

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR)

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: Not Reported

Vio. beginning Date: 05/01/94 Vio. end Date: 05/31/94 Vio. Period: 001 Months

Violation ID: 9424566 Source ID: Not Reported PWS Phone: Not Reported

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: LEAD & COPPER RULE

Violation Type: Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and Cu

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: Not Reported

Vio. beginning Date: 01/01/94 Vio. end Date: 06/30/94 Vio. Period: 006 Months

Violation ID: 9424567 Source ID: Not Reported PWS Phone: Not Reported

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR)

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: Not Reported

Vio. beginning Date: 03/01/94 Vio. end Date: 03/31/94 Vio. Period: 001 Months

Violation ID: 9422837 Source ID: Not Reported PWS Phone: Not Reported

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR)

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: Not Reported

Vio. beginning Date: 02/01/94 Vio. end Date: 02/28/94 Vio. Period: 001 Months

Violation ID: 9422836 Source ID: Not Reported PWS Phone: Not Reported

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-41

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: 000

Vio. beginning Date: 04/01/94 Vio. end Date: 06/30/94 Vio. Period: 003 Months

Violation ID: 9424558 Source ID: 000 PWS Phone: Not Reported

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: TRICHLOROETHYLENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: 000

Vio. beginning Date: 04/01/94 Vio. end Date: 06/30/94 Vio. Period: 003 Months

Violation ID: 9424559 Source ID: 000 PWS Phone: Not Reported

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: 000

Vio. beginning Date: 04/01/94 Vio. end Date: 06/30/94 Vio. Period: 003 Months

Violation ID: 9424560 Source ID: 000 PWS Phone: Not Reported

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: MONOCHLOROBENZENE (CHLOROBENZENE)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: 000

Vio. beginning Date: 04/01/94 Vio. end Date: 06/30/94 Vio. Period: 003 Months

Violation ID: 9424561 Source ID: 000 PWS Phone: Not Reported

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: BENZENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: 000

Vio. beginning Date: 04/01/94 Vio. end Date: 06/30/94 Vio. Period: 003 Months

Violation ID: 9424562 Source ID: 000 PWS Phone: Not Reported

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: TOLUENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: 000

Vio. beginning Date: 04/01/94 Vio. end Date: 06/30/94 Vio. Period: 003 Months

Violation ID: 9424563 Source ID: 000 PWS Phone: Not Reported

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-42

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: P-DICHLOROBENZENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: 000

Vio. beginning Date: 04/01/94 Vio. end Date: 06/30/94 Vio. Period: 003 Months

Violation ID: 9424552 Source ID: 000 PWS Phone: Not Reported

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: 000

Vio. beginning Date: 04/01/94 Vio. end Date: 06/30/94 Vio. Period: 003 Months

Violation ID: 9424553 Source ID: 000 PWS Phone: Not Reported

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: 000

Vio. beginning Date: 04/01/94 Vio. end Date: 06/30/94 Vio. Period: 003 Months

Violation ID: 9424554 Source ID: 000 PWS Phone: Not Reported

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: 000

Vio. beginning Date: 04/01/94 Vio. end Date: 06/30/94 Vio. Period: 003 Months

Violation ID: 9424555 Source ID: 000 PWS Phone: Not Reported

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: 000

Vio. beginning Date: 04/01/94 Vio. end Date: 06/30/94 Vio. Period: 003 Months

Violation ID: 9424556 Source ID: 000 PWS Phone: Not Reported

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: CARBON TETRACHLORIDE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: 000

Vio. beginning Date: 04/01/94 Vio. end Date: 06/30/94 Vio. Period: 003 Months

Violation ID: 9424557 Source ID: 000 PWS Phone: Not Reported

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-43

Enforcement Date: 5/15/2001 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5295201

Compliance Period: 3/1/2001 0:00:00 - 3/31/2001 0:00:00

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Routine Minor (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 5/15/2001 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 5295201

Compliance Period: 3/1/2001 0:00:00 - 3/31/2001 0:00:00

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Routine Minor (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 5/15/2001 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5295201

Compliance Period: 3/1/2001 0:00:00 - 3/31/2001 0:00:00

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Routine Minor (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: LEAD & COPPER RULE

Violation Type: Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and Cu

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: Not Reported

Vio. beginning Date: 04/01/93 Vio. end Date: 09/30/93 Vio. Period: 006 Months

Violation ID: 9321129 Source ID: Not Reported PWS Phone: Not Reported

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: 000

Vio. beginning Date: 04/01/94 Vio. end Date: 06/30/94 Vio. Period: 003 Months

Violation ID: 9424549 Source ID: 000 PWS Phone: Not Reported

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: XYLENES, TOTAL

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: 000

Vio. beginning Date: 04/01/94 Vio. end Date: 06/30/94 Vio. Period: 003 Months

Violation ID: 9424550 Source ID: 000 PWS Phone: Not Reported

Vio. Awareness Date: Not Reported

Contaminant: O-DICHLOROBENZENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

Analysis Method: Not Reported

Analysis Result: Not Reported Maximum Contaminant Level: Not Reported

Num required Samples: Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: 000

Vio. beginning Date: 04/01/94 Vio. end Date: 06/30/94 Vio. Period: 003 Months

Violation ID: 9424551 Source ID: 000 PWS Phone: Not Reported

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-44

Enforcement Date: 8/29/2002 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5601202

Compliance Period: 5/1/2002 0:00:00 - 5/31/2002 0:00:00

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 8/29/2002 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5601202

Compliance Period: 5/1/2002 0:00:00 - 5/31/2002 0:00:00

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 8/29/2002 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 5601202

Compliance Period: 5/1/2002 0:00:00 - 5/31/2002 0:00:00

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 8/29/2002 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 5601202

Compliance Period: 5/1/2002 0:00:00 - 5/31/2002 0:00:00

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 4/15/2001 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 5295301

Compliance Period: 2/1/2001 0:00:00 - 2/28/2001 0:00:00

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Repeat Major (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 4/15/2001 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5295301

Compliance Period: 2/1/2001 0:00:00 - 2/28/2001 0:00:00

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Repeat Major (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 4/15/2001 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 5295301

Compliance Period: 2/1/2001 0:00:00 - 2/28/2001 0:00:00

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Repeat Major (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 4/15/2001 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5295301

Compliance Period: 2/1/2001 0:00:00 - 2/28/2001 0:00:00

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Repeat Major (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 5/15/2001 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 5295201

Compliance Period: 3/1/2001 0:00:00 - 3/31/2001 0:00:00

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Routine Minor (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-45

Enforcement Date: 10/7/2004 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5601805

Compliance Period: 7/1/2004 0:00:00 - 9/30/2004 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 11/29/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Received

Violation ID: 5601704

Compliance Period: 4/1/2004 0:00:00 - 6/30/2004 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 8/24/2004 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5601704

Compliance Period: 4/1/2004 0:00:00 - 6/30/2004 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 11/29/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Received

Violation ID: 5601704

Compliance Period: 4/1/2004 0:00:00 - 6/30/2004 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 8/24/2004 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5601704

Compliance Period: 4/1/2004 0:00:00 - 6/30/2004 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 8/24/2004 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 5601704

Compliance Period: 4/1/2004 0:00:00 - 6/30/2004 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 8/26/2004 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 5601704

Compliance Period: 4/1/2004 0:00:00 - 6/30/2004 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 8/24/2004 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 5601704

Compliance Period: 4/1/2004 0:00:00 - 6/30/2004 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 8/26/2004 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 5601704

Compliance Period: 4/1/2004 0:00:00 - 6/30/2004 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-46

Enforcement Date: 12/5/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State BCA Signed

Violation ID: 5602705

Compliance Period: 8/4/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: PN Violation for NPDWR Violation

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 9/14/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5602705

Compliance Period: 8/4/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: PN Violation for NPDWR Violation

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 10/7/2004 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 5601805

Compliance Period: 7/1/2004 0:00:00 - 9/30/2004 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 10/7/2004 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5601805

Compliance Period: 7/1/2004 0:00:00 - 9/30/2004 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 11/29/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Received

Violation ID: 5601805

Compliance Period: 7/1/2004 0:00:00 - 9/30/2004 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 10/7/2004 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 5601805

Compliance Period: 7/1/2004 0:00:00 - 9/30/2004 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 11/29/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Received

Violation ID: 5601805

Compliance Period: 7/1/2004 0:00:00 - 9/30/2004 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 8/26/2004 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 5601805

Compliance Period: 7/1/2004 0:00:00 - 9/30/2004 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 8/26/2004 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 5601805

Compliance Period: 7/1/2004 0:00:00 - 9/30/2004 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-47

Enforcement Date: 9/14/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5602805

Compliance Period: 8/4/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: Other Non-NPDWR Potential Health Risks

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 11/29/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 5602805

Compliance Period: 8/4/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: Other Non-NPDWR Potential Health Risks

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 12/5/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State BCA Signed

Violation ID: 5602805

Compliance Period: 8/4/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: Other Non-NPDWR Potential Health Risks

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 9/14/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5602705

Compliance Period: 8/4/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: PN Violation for NPDWR Violation

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 12/5/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State BCA Signed

Violation ID: 5602705

Compliance Period: 8/4/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: PN Violation for NPDWR Violation

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 11/29/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 5602705

Compliance Period: 8/4/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: PN Violation for NPDWR Violation

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 10/27/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Formal NOV Issued

Violation ID: 5602705

Compliance Period: 8/4/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: PN Violation for NPDWR Violation

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 10/27/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Formal NOV Issued

Violation ID: 5602705

Compliance Period: 8/4/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: PN Violation for NPDWR Violation

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 11/29/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 5602705

Compliance Period: 8/4/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: PN Violation for NPDWR Violation

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-48

Enforcement Date: 11/29/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 5603106

Compliance Period: 10/8/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: PN Violation for NPDWR Violation

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 11/10/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5603106

Compliance Period: 10/8/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: PN Violation for NPDWR Violation

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 10/27/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Formal NOV Issued

Violation ID: 5603106

Compliance Period: 10/8/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: PN Violation for NPDWR Violation

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 10/27/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Formal NOV Issued

Violation ID: 5603106

Compliance Period: 10/8/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: PN Violation for NPDWR Violation

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 10/27/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Formal NOV Issued

Violation ID: 5602805

Compliance Period: 8/4/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: Other Non-NPDWR Potential Health Risks

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 10/27/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Formal NOV Issued

Violation ID: 5602805

Compliance Period: 8/4/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: Other Non-NPDWR Potential Health Risks

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 11/29/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 5602805

Compliance Period: 8/4/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: Other Non-NPDWR Potential Health Risks

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 12/5/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State BCA Signed

Violation ID: 5602805

Compliance Period: 8/4/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: Other Non-NPDWR Potential Health Risks

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 9/14/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5602805

Compliance Period: 8/4/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: Other Non-NPDWR Potential Health Risks

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-49

Enforcement Date: 11/29/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 5603206

Compliance Period: 10/8/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: Other Non-NPDWR Potential Health Risks

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 12/5/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State BCA Signed

Violation ID: 5603206

Compliance Period: 10/8/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: Other Non-NPDWR Potential Health Risks

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 12/5/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State BCA Signed

Violation ID: 5603206

Compliance Period: 10/8/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: Other Non-NPDWR Potential Health Risks

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 11/29/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 5603206

Compliance Period: 10/8/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: Other Non-NPDWR Potential Health Risks

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 11/10/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5603206

Compliance Period: 10/8/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: Other Non-NPDWR Potential Health Risks

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 11/10/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5603106

Compliance Period: 10/8/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: PN Violation for NPDWR Violation

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 11/29/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 5603106

Compliance Period: 10/8/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: PN Violation for NPDWR Violation

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 12/5/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State BCA Signed

Violation ID: 5603106

Compliance Period: 10/8/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: PN Violation for NPDWR Violation

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 12/5/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State BCA Signed

Violation ID: 5603106

Compliance Period: 10/8/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: PN Violation for NPDWR Violation

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-50

Enforcement Date: 1/17/2006 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 5603506

Compliance Period: 10/1/2005 0:00:00 - 12/31/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1/26/2006 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5603506

Compliance Period: 10/1/2005 0:00:00 - 12/31/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1/26/2006 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 5603506

Compliance Period: 10/1/2005 0:00:00 - 12/31/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1/26/2006 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 5603506

Compliance Period: 10/1/2005 0:00:00 - 12/31/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1/26/2006 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5603506

Compliance Period: 10/1/2005 0:00:00 - 12/31/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1/17/2006 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 5603506

Compliance Period: 10/1/2005 0:00:00 - 12/31/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 10/27/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Formal NOV Issued

Violation ID: 5603206

Compliance Period: 10/8/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: Other Non-NPDWR Potential Health Risks

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 10/27/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Formal NOV Issued

Violation ID: 5603206

Compliance Period: 10/8/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: Other Non-NPDWR Potential Health Risks

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 11/10/2005 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5603206

Compliance Period: 10/8/2005 0:00:00 - 11/29/2005 0:00:00

Contaminant: 7500

Violation Type: Other Non-NPDWR Potential Health Risks

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-51

Enforcement Date: 10/16/2006 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 5604207

Compliance Period: 9/1/2006 0:00:00 - 9/30/2006 0:00:00

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 7/26/2006 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5604106

Compliance Period: 4/1/2006 0:00:00 - 6/30/2006 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 7/20/2006 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 5604106

Compliance Period: 4/1/2006 0:00:00 - 6/30/2006 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: No Enf Action as of Enf. Action: 10/17/2006 0:00:00

Violation ID: 5604106

Compliance Period: 4/1/2006 0:00:00 - 6/30/2006 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 8/1/2006 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Received

Violation ID: 5604106

Compliance Period: 4/1/2006 0:00:00 - 6/30/2006 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 7/26/2006 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 5604106

Compliance Period: 4/1/2006 0:00:00 - 6/30/2006 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: No Enf Action as of Enf. Action: 10/17/2006 0:00:00

Violation ID: 5604006

Compliance Period: 6/1/2006 0:00:00 - 6/30/2006 0:00:00

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 7/25/2006 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5604006

Compliance Period: 6/1/2006 0:00:00 - 6/30/2006 0:00:00

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 7/25/2006 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 5604006

Compliance Period: 6/1/2006 0:00:00 - 6/30/2006 0:00:00

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-52

Enforcement Date: 1994-05-12 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 9422837

Compliance Period: 1994-03-01 - 1994-03-31

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1994-05-12 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 9422837

Compliance Period: 1994-03-01 - 1994-03-31

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1994-04-07 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 9422836

Compliance Period: 1994-02-01 - 1994-02-28

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1994-04-07 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 9422836

Compliance Period: 1994-02-01 - 1994-02-28

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1995-01-01 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 9321129

Compliance Period: 1994-07-01 - 2015-12-31

Contaminant: LEAD & COPPER RULE

Violation Type: Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and Cu

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 10/26/2006 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 5604307

Compliance Period: 7/1/2006 0:00:00 - 9/30/2006 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 10/17/2006 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 5604307

Compliance Period: 7/1/2006 0:00:00 - 9/30/2006 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 10/17/2006 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5604307

Compliance Period: 7/1/2006 0:00:00 - 9/30/2006 0:00:00

Contaminant: 0999

Violation Type: Monitoring and Reporting Stage 1

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 10/16/2006 0:00:00 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 5604207

Compliance Period: 9/1/2006 0:00:00 - 9/30/2006 0:00:00

Contaminant: COLIFORM (TCR)

Violation Type: Monitoring, Routine Major (TCR)

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-53

Enforcement Date: 1994-11-09 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 9424551

Compliance Period: 1994-04-01 - 1994-06-30

Contaminant: O-DICHLOROBENZENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1994-07-14 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 9424551

Compliance Period: 1994-04-01 - 1994-06-30

Contaminant: O-DICHLOROBENZENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1994-07-14 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 9424551

Compliance Period: 1994-04-01 - 1994-06-30

Contaminant: O-DICHLOROBENZENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1994-11-09 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 9424550

Compliance Period: 1994-04-01 - 1994-06-30

Contaminant: XYLENES, TOTAL

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1994-07-14 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 9424550

Compliance Period: 1994-04-01 - 1994-06-30

Contaminant: XYLENES, TOTAL

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1994-07-14 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 9424550

Compliance Period: 1994-04-01 - 1994-06-30

Contaminant: XYLENES, TOTAL

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1994-11-09 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 9424549

Compliance Period: 1994-04-01 - 1994-06-30

Contaminant: CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1994-07-14 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 9424549

Compliance Period: 1994-04-01 - 1994-06-30

Contaminant: CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1994-07-14 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 9424549

Compliance Period: 1994-04-01 - 1994-06-30

Contaminant: CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-54

T81

WNW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197711

Enforcement Date: 1994-07-14 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 9424554

Compliance Period: 1994-04-01 - 1994-06-30

Contaminant: TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1994-11-09 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 9424553

Compliance Period: 1994-04-01 - 1994-06-30

Contaminant: 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1994-07-14 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 9424553

Compliance Period: 1994-04-01 - 1994-06-30

Contaminant: 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1994-07-14 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 9424553

Compliance Period: 1994-04-01 - 1994-06-30

Contaminant: 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1994-11-09 Enf. Action: State Compliance Achieved

Violation ID: 9424552

Compliance Period: 1994-04-01 - 1994-06-30

Contaminant: P-DICHLOROBENZENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1994-07-14 Enf. Action: State Public Notif Requested

Violation ID: 9424552

Compliance Period: 1994-04-01 - 1994-06-30

Contaminant: P-DICHLOROBENZENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

Enforcement Date: 1994-07-14 Enf. Action: State Violation/Reminder Notice

Violation ID: 9424552

Compliance Period: 1994-04-01 - 1994-06-30

Contaminant: P-DICHLOROBENZENE

Violation Type: Monitoring, Regular

System Name: DEARBORN MHP

ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-55

S84

WSW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILSG10000196671

Site id: ILSG10000196670

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 20

Status: ENG Elevation: 710

Farm num: B-3 Company na: Layne Western Co., Inc.

Rdir: E Farm name: Property Addition

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 24 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.767117

Longitude: -88.27313

Api number: 120892304200

S83

WSW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILSG10000196670

Site id: ILSG10000197712

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 173

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: 1 Company na: Geltz, N. H.

Rdir: E Farm name: Hubbard William

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.778067

Longitude: -88.273268

Api number: 120890040700

T82

WNW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197712

Site id: ILSG10000197711

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 145

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Will-Dupage Drill Co.

Rdir: E Farm name: Kresz Tony

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.778067

Longitude: -88.273268

Api number: 120892347600

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-56

87

NNW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILEP10000005416

Site id: ILSG10000195952

Wfmto: 120 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: rock Wfmfrom: 105

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 120

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Knierim, Phil

Rdir: E Farm name: Magill, John D.

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 19 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.760177

Longitude: -88.257826

Api number: 120432623100

86

South

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000195952

Site id: ILSG10000196672

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 20

Status: ENG Elevation: 710

Farm num: B-1 Company na: Layne Western Co., Inc.

Rdir: E Farm name: Property Addition

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 24 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.767117

Longitude: -88.27313

Api number: 120892304100

S85

WSW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILSG10000196672

Site id: ILSG10000196671

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 169

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Not Reported

Rdir: E Farm name: Dearborn MHP

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 24 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.767117

Longitude: -88.27313

Api number: 120893436700

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-57

P89

NW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34441

Site id: ILSG10000198098

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 119

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: 1 Company na: Geltz, N. H.

Rdir: E Farm name: Johannessen Kenneth

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.782178

Longitude: -88.269342

Api number: 120892284200

P88

NW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000198098

Updt ts: 12/30/1899 Site id: ILEP10000005416

Range: Not Reported Section: Not Reported

Meridian: Not Reported Township: Not Reported

Long dec d: 0

Lat dec de: 0

Pop cnt: 0

Fed type c: Not Reported B name: Not Reported

Prn cnty: Not Reported Status cd: Not Reported

Zip code: Not Reported Fips cd: Not Reported

City name: Not Reported State code: Not Reported

Addr two t: Not Reported

Addr one t: Not Reported

Facility n: Not Reported

Fac name: Not Reported

Cwswell merg are: 0

Sys number: IL0894070 Api: Not Reported

Pws status: A Sdwis well: WL01758

Y coord: 3334832.41055

X coord: 3334832.41055

Amb well: 0

W aquifer: Not Reported

W d depth: 1450

W min setb: 200

W suscept: Not Reported W policy: C

W cws name: AURORA W status: P

Well id: 01758 W cws num: 0894070

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-58

S92

WSW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34569

Driller: WARD

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology,Chemical Analysis

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: ~~

Section: 13 Plot Location: 3H

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 100 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: M108415 Date Drilled: 07/28/1983

Owner: HENRY KOBULNICKY

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066121 Second ID: Not Reported

P91

NW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34440

Driller: GELTZ

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: ~~

Section: 13 Plot Location: 3H

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 119 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: M041901 Date Drilled: 10/08/1975

Owner: KENNETH JOHANNESSEN

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066123 Second ID: Not Reported

P90

NW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34442

Driller: GELTZ

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: ~~

Section: 13 Plot Location: 3H

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 121 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: M004826 Date Drilled: 00/00/1968

Owner: JIM POPP

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066122 Second ID: Not Reported

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-59

Q95

ENE

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197827

Driller: KNIERIM

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: --

Section: 17 Plot Location: 7E

Township: 38N Range: 09E

County Code: 043 County: DUPAGE

Depth (in feet): 220 Aquifer Type: Bedrock

Permit: 009635 Date Drilled: 03/01/1989

Owner: TOM PHILLIPS

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 181811 Second ID: Not Reported

94

ENE

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P13000

Driller: GELTZ

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: IN Well Type: ~~

Section: 24 Plot Location: 4H

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 200 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: M009187 Date Drilled: 00/00/1970

Owner: DUR-O-VAL OF ILL

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066188 Second ID: Not Reported

S93

WSW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34568

Driller: GELTZ

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: IN Well Type: ~~

Section: 24 Plot Location: 4H

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 308 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: M012363 Date Drilled: 00/00/1971

Owner: DUR-O-VAL OF ILL

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066189 Second ID: Not Reported

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-60

98

NW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000198240

Driller: JAMES KNIERIM

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Commercial Well Type: --

Section: 20 Plot Location: 8G

Township: 38N Range: 09E

County Code: 043 County: DUPAGE

Depth (in feet): 216 Aquifer Type: Bedrock

Permit: 061274 Date Drilled: 06/07/1977

Owner: AURORA THERMO GAS

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 181833 Second ID: Not Reported

V97

ESE

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P13030

Site id: ILSG10000197191

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 20

Status: ENG Elevation: 710

Farm num: B-1 Company na: Layne Western Co., Inc.

Rdir: E Farm name: Strathmore Co. Plant

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.772533

Longitude: -88.275603

Api number: 120892278900

U96

West

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197191

Site id: ILSG10000197827

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 144

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Pohl, Harold N.

Rdir: E Farm name: Haiar D

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 17 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.779047

Longitude: -88.243252

Api number: 120430323200

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-61

101

West

1/2 - 1 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS P34445

Site id: ILSG10000196580

Wfmto: 216 Pumpgpm: 25

Wformation: rock Wfmfrom: 45

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 216

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Knierim, James

Rdir: E Farm name: Aurora Thermo Gas

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 20 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.76591

Longitude: -88.243303

Api number: 120432525100

V100

ESE

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000196580

Driller: Not Reported

Record Type: Chemical Analysis

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: ~~

Section: 13 Plot Location: 5D

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 125 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 00/00/0000

Owner: DONALD J HOPP

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066127 Second ID: Not Reported

W99

West

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34446

Site id: ILSG10000198240

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 1450

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: 28 Company na: Water Well Solutions

Rdir: E Farm name: Aurora

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 12 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.783301

Longitude: -88.268476

Api number: 120893636900

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-62

U104

West

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197242

Site id: ILSG10000197223

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 14

Status: ENG Elevation: 0

Farm num: B-6 Company na: Layne Western Co., Inc.

Rdir: E Farm name: Riverdale Coat Co

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.772917

Longitude: -88.275975

Api number: 120892254700

U103

West

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197223

Site id: ILSG10000195932

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 155

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: 1 Company na: Geltz, N. H.

Rdir: E Farm name: Aurora Lincoln Merc

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 24 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.760066

Longitude: -88.263413

Api number: 120892260500

102

SSW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILSG10000195932

Driller: Not Reported

Record Type: Chemical Analysis,Any other type of record

Well Use: IN Well Type: ~~

Section: 13 Plot Location: 5B

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 1358 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 04/06/1944

Owner: C B AND Q RR

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066126 Second ID: Not Reported

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-63

107

SW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34563

Driller: DUPAGE PUMP

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: ~~

Section: 24 Plot Location: 3F

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 130 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: M074446 Date Drilled: 05/18/1978

Owner: DOMIN AND SONS

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066184 Second ID: Not Reported

106

SW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34564

Site id: ILSG10000197292

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 14

Status: ENG Elevation: 710

Farm num: B-4 Company na: Layne Western Co., Inc.

Rdir: E Farm name: Riverdale Coat Co

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.773659

Longitude: -88.275995

Api number: 120892254500

W105

West

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197292

Site id: ILSG10000197242

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 14

Status: ENG Elevation: 0

Farm num: B-5 Company na: Layne Western Co., Inc.

Rdir: E Farm name: Riverdale Coat Co

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.773163

Longitude: -88.275982

Api number: 120892254600

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-64

110

ENE

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197584

Site id: ILSG10000197222

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 16

Status: ENG Elevation: 710

Farm num: B-1 Company na: Layne Western Co., Inc.

Rdir: E Farm name: Riverdale Coat Co

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.772903

Longitude: -88.276491

Api number: 120892254200

U109

West

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197222

Site id: ILSG10000197601

Wfmto: 320 Pumpgpm: 15

Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 295

Elevref: GL Total dept: 320

Status: WATER Elevation: 715

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Neely, Mark S.

Rdir: E Farm name: Bartlett, Ron

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.776796

Longitude: -88.275479

Api number: 120892895400

X108

WNW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197601

Driller: GELTZ

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: ~~

Section: 24 Plot Location: 2E

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 141 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: M021239 Date Drilled: 12/08/1972

Owner: ROMAN GONZALEZ

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066183 Second ID: Not Reported

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-65

W113

West

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197290

Site id: ILSG10000195936

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 160

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: 1 Company na: Touvell Albert R

Rdir: E Farm name: Nadlers

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 24 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.760108

Longitude: -88.265363

Api number: 120890041000

112

SSW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000195936

Site id: ILSG10000197256

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 14

Status: ENG Elevation: 0

Farm num: B-2 Company na: Layne Western Co., Inc.

Rdir: E Farm name: Riverdale Coat Co

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.773276

Longitude: -88.276499

Api number: 120892254300

U111

West

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197256

Site id: ILSG10000197584

Wfmto: 220 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: shale Wfmfrom: 80

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 220

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Knierim, Phil

Rdir: E Farm name: Eola Post Office

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 17 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.776663

Longitude: -88.240888

Api number: 120432863700

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-66

X116

WNW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P34447

Site id: ILSG10000198333

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 111

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: 1 Company na: Geltz, N. H.

Rdir: E Farm name: Welch J B

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 12 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.784702

Longitude: -88.267543

Api number: 120892260400

115

NNW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000198333

Site id: ILSG10000197678

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 8

Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 110

Status: WATER Elevation: 715

Farm num: 2 Company na: Weirich, William Theodore

Rdir: E Farm name: Neisendorf, Robert

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.777621

Longitude: -88.275497

Api number: 120892895700

X114

WNW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS ILSG10000197678

Site id: ILSG10000197290

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 14

Status: ENG Elevation: 0

Farm num: B-3 Company na: Layne Western Co., Inc.

Rdir: E Farm name: Riverdale Coat Co

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.773648

Longitude: -88.276507

Api number: 120892254400

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-67

119

SW

1/2 - 1 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILSG10000196146

Site id: ILSG10000197068

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: GL Total dept: 220

Status: WATER Elevation: 700

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Knierim Company, Inc.

Rdir: E Farm name: City Auto Wrecker

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 13 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.771234

Longitude: -88.277188

Api number: 120892240700

118

West

1/2 - 1 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILSG10000197068

Driller: GELTZ

Record Type: Affidavit

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: --

Section: 17 Plot Location: 8H

Township: 38N Range: 09E

County Code: 043 County: DUPAGE

Depth (in feet): 76 Aquifer Type: --

Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 03/15/1989

Owner: AURORA VENTURE

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 181815 Second ID: Not Reported

117

NE

1/2 - 1 Mile

Higher

IL WELLS P13003

Driller: NEELY

Record Type: Construction Report,Geology

Well Use: Domestic Well Type: ~~

Section: 13 Plot Location: 5E

Township: 38N Range: 08E

County Code: 089 County: KANE

Depth (in feet): 320 Aquifer Type: ~~

Permit: M109775 Date Drilled: 10/06/1983

Owner: RON BARTLETT

Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey

Well ID: 066128 Second ID: Not Reported

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-68

Site id: ILSG10000195754

Wfmto: 120 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: rock Wfmfrom: 50

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 120

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: Not Reported Company na: Knierim, James

Rdir: E Farm name: Duhai, John

Tdir: N Rng: 9

Section: 19 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.758404

Longitude: -88.255384

Api number: 120432623000

120

South

1/2 - 1 Mile

Lower

IL WELLS ILSG10000195754

Site id: ILSG10000196146

Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0

Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0

Elevref: Not Reported Total dept: 185

Status: WATER Elevation: 0

Farm num: 3 Company na: Geltz, N. H.

Rdir: E Farm name: Dadin Gardens

Tdir: N Rng: 8

Section: 24 Twp: 38

Latitude: 41.761728

Longitude: -88.270694

Api number: 120890050700

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 
TC2800629.2s Page A-69

Basement Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported

Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported

Living Area - 1st Floor 0.400 pCi/L 100% 0% 0%

Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L % 4-20 pCi/L % >20 pCi/L

Number of sites tested: 1

Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 60504

 : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.

 : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L.

 Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.

Federal EPA Radon Zone for DUPAGE County: 2 

1st Floor living area 13 0.8 2.4 6.4 1 0 DUPAGE

Basement 135 0.5 4.8 64.5 47 3 DUPAGE

Total 167 0.5 4.4 64.5 51 3 DUPAGE

1st Floor bedroom 19 1.1 3.1 5.4 3 0 DUPAGE

____ ______ ________ ________ ________ _____________ _________ _____

Floor # Sites Min pCi/L Avg pCi/L Max pCi/L # Sites>4pCi/L # Sites>20 County

Radon Test Results 

State Database: IL Radon 

AREA RADON INFORMATION

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS

RADON


TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM)

Source: United States Geologic Survey

EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds

to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data

with consistent elevation units and projection.

Scanned Digital USGS 7.5’ Topographic Map (DRG)

Source: United States Geologic Survey

A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images

are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image

is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection.

HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION

Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2009 from the Federal

Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA.

NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR

in 2002 and 2005 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION

AQUIFLOW Information System R

Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information

EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater

flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has

extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table

information.

GEOLOGIC INFORMATION

Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit

Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital

representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).

STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database

Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national

Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil

survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation

of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)

soil survey maps.

SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database

Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS)

Telephone: 800-672-5559

SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping

scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to

construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the

original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county

natural resource planning and management.

TC2800629.2s Page A-70

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS

FEDERAL WATER WELLS

PWS: Public Water Systems

Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water

Telephone: 202-564-3750

Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at

least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.

PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data

Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water

Telephone: 202-564-3750

Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after

August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).

USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)

This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface

water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.

STATE RECORDS

Water Well Records

Source: Illinois Geological Survey

Telephone: 217-333-4747

Illinois Private Well Database and PICS (Public, Industrial, Commercial Survey)

Source: Illinois State Water Survey

Telephone: 217-333-9043

Water Well Location Information

Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Telephone: 217-782-0810

OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION

RADON

State Database: IL Radon

Source: Department of Nuclear Safety

Telephone: 217-785-9958

County Radon Results

Area Radon Information

Source: USGS

Telephone: 703-356-4020

The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.

The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at

private sources such as universities and research institutions.

EPA Radon Zones

Source: EPA

Telephone: 703-356-4020

Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor

radon levels.

OTHER

Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities

Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656

Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater

Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

TC2800629.2s Page A-71

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION

© 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection

and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject

to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.

TC2800629.2s Page A-72

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

Appendix D 

Interview Documentation

Project BNSF Eola Yard PESA Project No. 142673 

Time Date 6/28/2010 

Call to Jim Cunningham Phone No. 612.817.1587 

Call from Robin Martel Phone No. 773.380.7935 

Discussion, Agreement and/or Action

Jim Cunningham, BNSF, was contacted regarding the environmental conditions of the Eola Yard 

site. Mr. Cunningham stated that there was a collision between BNSF and Southern Pacific trains in 

the early 1990’s were diesel fuel was spilled. The collision occurred on the western end of the yard 

near Farnsworth Road. At the time of the incident, 5,000 gallons of diesel fuel was estimated; 

however, it has been determined that more fuel was spilled that originally thought. Mr. Cunningham 

stated that a majority of the soil remained in place; however, some soils were moved to another 

location and remediated. He was not sure of the status of that “land farm”. Some in-situ 

remediation did occur at the location of the spill due to the inability to remove the active tracks for 

complete excavation of the soils. 

During investigations for the diesel fuel it was determined that there was a LUST nearby. This was 

a leasehold property that the BNSF owned. BNSF is in the process of remediating that site. 

Mr. Cunningham stated that there are no more USTs on site. Tanks were removed from the fueling 

yard but were not leaking. 

All of the environmental remediation activities are being conducted through the Illinois Site 

Remediation Program. 

Mr. Cunningham is not aware of any other environmental conditions of the site. 

The on-site buildings are for office space/storage and maintenance for the maintenance-of-way 

equipment. The facility does have a NPDES permit and an SPCC and Stormwater Management 

Plan. 

Mr. Cunningham stated that Mr. Michael Woolridge is currently working on the environmental 

remediation activities at the site and would have more information. Mr. Woolridge can be reached at 

763.782.3483 
Project BNSF Eola Yard PESA Project No. 142673 

Time Date 7/6/2010 

Call to Michael Woolridge Phone No. 763.782.3483 

Call from Robin Martel Phone No. 773.380.7935 

Discussion, Agreement and/or Action

Mr. Michael Woolridge, BNSF, was contacted in regards to the environmental conditions of the Eola 

Yard project. I informed Mr. Woolridge that his contact information was provided by Mr. Jim 

Cunningham. 

Mr. Woolridge indicated that there are currently 2-active projects that the BNSF is working on 

through the Illinois EPA, Site Remediation Program. Those projects are referred to as the Aurora 

Wholesale Auto and the Indian Creek Development. The Indian Creek Development project is due 

to the off-site migration of contaminants from the on-site collision of two trains in Eola Yard. The 

incident involved the release of diesel. The Aurora Wholesale Auto is from a leasehold property that 

BNSF is ultimately responsible for as the property owner. 

Robin Martel asked Mr. Woolridge about the 55-gallon drum labeled as purge water that is currently 

sitting on-site. Mr. Woolridge indicated that under the direction of the IEPA, BNSF sampled the 

surrounding water supply wells. Mr. Woolridge also indicated that BNSF will be collecting 

sediment samples from the Indian Creek, as part of the remediation program for the project. 

Robin Martel asked Mr. Woolridge if there are any soil management plans or special use restrictions 

on the Eola Yard. Mr. Woolridge indicated that there we not, but any contractors doing work on-site 

would need to stockpile, profile, and dispose of any contaminated soils in the proper manner. 

Mr. Woolridge indicated that there are groundwater monitoring wells onsite. 

Robin Martel asked if the areas of contamination have been delineated. Mr. Woolridge indicated 

that he could show the areas of contamination and the approximate limits on a map. 

Ms. Martel agreed to send (via email), a map of the project so that Mr. Woolridge could mark the 

locations and send back to Ms. Martel. 

Mr Woolridge was not aware of any violations and was not sure of the specific plans that are in 

place at the site. 
Project BNSF Eola Yard PESA Project No. 142673 

Time Date 7/21/2010 

Call to Steve Skare Phone No. 630.789.9336 

Call from Robin Martel Phone No. 773.380.7935 

Discussion, Agreement and/or Action

Steve Skare, EMR, was contacted regarding the environmental conditions of the Eola Yard site. Mr. 

Skare’s firm is an environmental consultant working on site investigations/remediation with the 

BNSF at Eola Yard. Mr. Skare stated that there was an AST release in 2001 at Eola Yard. The site 

was remediated and closed. Mr. Skare also stated that there was a locomotive that leaked diesel fuel 

in 2008; this release is currently part of an ongoing investigation through the Illinois State Site unit. 

Additional underground storage tanks have been removed from the site in the early 2000’s but stated 

that they were determined to not be leaking. 

Mr. Skare’s firm is working on a LUST site located outside of Eola Yard, referred to as Wholesale 

Auto. This is a BNSF leasehold property located off the mainline tracks, east of the Fox River in 

downtown Aurora. Mr. Skare stated that this LUST was first reported in the early 1990’s. Mr. 

Skare confirmed that this site is not located within Eola Yard. The site is located along Broadway 

and Illinois Streets in Aurora, Illinois. He understood that this is not a mainline track for the BNSF 

and is a spur line. 

 

Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

Appendix E 

Historical Research Documentation 


EDR Historical Topographic Map Report

Environmental Data Resources, Inc.s (EDR) Historical Topographic Map Report is designed to assist professionals in

evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topographic Map Report

includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the early 1900s.

Thank you for your business.

Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050

with any questions or comments.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice

This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc.

It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO

WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA

RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,

MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL

ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,

ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,

CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY

LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings,

environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they

be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site

Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the

information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2010 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map

of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks

used herein are the property of their respective owners.
Historical Topographic Map

→

N

TARGET QUAD

NAME: GENEVA

MAP YEAR: 1949

REVISED:1932

SERIES: 15

SCALE: 1:62500

SITE NAME: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

 ADDRESS: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

Aurora, IL 60502

LAT/LONG: 41.7727 / -88.2583

CLIENT: HDR Engineering, Inc.

CONTACT: Robin Martel

INQUIRY#: 2800629.4

RESEARCH DATE: 06/23/2010
Historical Topographic Map

→

N

TARGET QUAD

NAME: WHEATON

MAP YEAR: 1949

REVISED:1908

SERIES: 15

SCALE: 1:62500

SITE NAME: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

 ADDRESS: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

Aurora, IL 60502

LAT/LONG: 41.7727 / -88.2583

CLIENT: HDR Engineering, Inc.

CONTACT: Robin Martel

INQUIRY#: 2800629.4

RESEARCH DATE: 06/23/2010
Historical Topographic Map

→

N

TARGET QUAD

NAME: AURORA NORTH

MAP YEAR: 1950

SERIES: 7.5

SCALE: 1:24000

SITE NAME: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

 ADDRESS: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

Aurora, IL 60502

LAT/LONG: 41.7727 / -88.2583

CLIENT: HDR Engineering, Inc.

CONTACT: Robin Martel

INQUIRY#: 2800629.4

RESEARCH DATE: 06/23/2010
Historical Topographic Map

→

N

TARGET QUAD

NAME: NAPERVILLE

MAP YEAR: 1953

SERIES: 7.5

SCALE: 1:24000

SITE NAME: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

 ADDRESS: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

Aurora, IL 60502

LAT/LONG: 41.7727 / -88.2583

CLIENT: HDR Engineering, Inc.

CONTACT: Robin Martel

INQUIRY#: 2800629.4

RESEARCH DATE: 06/23/2010
Historical Topographic Map

→

N

TARGET QUAD

NAME: WHEATON

MAP YEAR: 1954

SERIES: 15

SCALE: 1:62500

SITE NAME: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

 ADDRESS: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

Aurora, IL 60502

LAT/LONG: 41.7727 / -88.2583

CLIENT: HDR Engineering, Inc.

CONTACT: Robin Martel

INQUIRY#: 2800629.4

RESEARCH DATE: 06/23/2010
Historical Topographic Map

→

N

TARGET QUAD

NAME: NAPERVILLE

MAP YEAR: 1962

SERIES: 7.5

SCALE: 1:24000

SITE NAME: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

 ADDRESS: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

Aurora, IL 60502

LAT/LONG: 41.7727 / -88.2583

CLIENT: HDR Engineering, Inc.

CONTACT: Robin Martel

INQUIRY#: 2800629.4

RESEARCH DATE: 06/23/2010
Historical Topographic Map

→

N

TARGET QUAD

NAME: AURORA NORTH

MAP YEAR: 1964

SERIES: 7.5

SCALE: 1:24000

SITE NAME: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

 ADDRESS: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

Aurora, IL 60502

LAT/LONG: 41.7727 / -88.2583

CLIENT: HDR Engineering, Inc.

CONTACT: Robin Martel

INQUIRY#: 2800629.4

RESEARCH DATE: 06/23/2010
Historical Topographic Map

→

N

TARGET QUAD

NAME: AURORA NORTH

MAP YEAR: 1972

PHOTOREVISED:1964

SERIES: 7.5

SCALE: 1:24000

SITE NAME: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

 ADDRESS: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

Aurora, IL 60502

LAT/LONG: 41.7727 / -88.2583

CLIENT: HDR Engineering, Inc.

CONTACT: Robin Martel

INQUIRY#: 2800629.4

RESEARCH DATE: 06/23/2010
Historical Topographic Map

→

N

TARGET QUAD

NAME: NAPERVILLE

MAP YEAR: 1972

PHOTOREVISED:1962

SERIES: 7.5

SCALE: 1:24000

SITE NAME: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

 ADDRESS: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

Aurora, IL 60502

LAT/LONG: 41.7727 / -88.2583

CLIENT: HDR Engineering, Inc.

CONTACT: Robin Martel

INQUIRY#: 2800629.4

RESEARCH DATE: 06/23/2010
Historical Topographic Map

→

N

TARGET QUAD

NAME: AURORA NORTH

MAP YEAR: 1978

PHOTOINSPECTED: 1964

SERIES: 7.5

SCALE: 1:24000

SITE NAME: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

 ADDRESS: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

Aurora, IL 60502

LAT/LONG: 41.7727 / -88.2583

CLIENT: HDR Engineering, Inc.

CONTACT: Robin Martel

INQUIRY#: 2800629.4

RESEARCH DATE: 06/23/2010
Historical Topographic Map

→

N

TARGET QUAD

NAME: NAPERVILLE

MAP YEAR: 1980

PHOTOREVISED:1962

SERIES: 7.5

SCALE: 1:24000

SITE NAME: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

 ADDRESS: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

Aurora, IL 60502

LAT/LONG: 41.7727 / -88.2583

CLIENT: HDR Engineering, Inc.

CONTACT: Robin Martel

INQUIRY#: 2800629.4

RESEARCH DATE: 06/23/2010
Historical Topographic Map

→

N

TARGET QUAD

NAME: AURORA NORTH

MAP YEAR: 1993

SERIES: 7.5

SCALE: 1:24000

SITE NAME: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

 ADDRESS: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

Aurora, IL 60502

LAT/LONG: 41.7727 / -88.2583

CLIENT: HDR Engineering, Inc.

CONTACT: Robin Martel

INQUIRY#: 2800629.4

RESEARCH DATE: 06/23/2010
Historical Topographic Map

→

N

TARGET QUAD

NAME: NAPERVILLE

MAP YEAR: 1993

SERIES: 7.5

SCALE: 1:24000

SITE NAME: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

 ADDRESS: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

Aurora, IL 60502

LAT/LONG: 41.7727 / -88.2583

CLIENT: HDR Engineering, Inc.

CONTACT: Robin Martel

INQUIRY#: 2800629.4

RESEARCH DATE: 06/23/2010
Historical Topographic Map

→

N

TARGET QUAD

NAME: AURORA NORTH

MAP YEAR: 1998

SERIES: 7.5

SCALE: 1:24000

SITE NAME: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

 ADDRESS: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

Aurora, IL 60502

LAT/LONG: 41.7727 / -88.2583

CLIENT: HDR Engineering, Inc.

CONTACT: Robin Martel

INQUIRY#: 2800629.4

RESEARCH DATE: 06/23/2010
Historical Topographic Map

→

N

TARGET QUAD

NAME: NAPERVILLE

MAP YEAR: 1998

SERIES: 7.5

SCALE: 1:24000

SITE NAME: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

 ADDRESS: Eola Yard Improvements Project

Level EA

Aurora, IL 60502

LAT/LONG: 41.7727 / -88.2583

CLIENT: HDR Engineering, Inc.

CONTACT: Robin Martel

INQUIRY#: 2800629.4

RESEARCH DATE: 06/23/2010


EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package

Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist

environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s

professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo

per decade.

When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE

ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more

information contact your EDR Account Executive.

Thank you for your business.

Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050

with any questions or comments.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice

This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc.

It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO

WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA

RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,

MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL

ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,

ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,

CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY

LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings,

environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they

be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site

Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the

information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2010 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map

of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks

used herein are the property of their respective owners.
Date EDR Searched Historical Sources:

Aerial Photography	June 23, 2010

Target Property:

Eola Yard Improvements Project Level EA

Aurora, IL 60502

Year Scale Details Source

1956 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=1000' Panel #: 41088-G3, Aurora North, IL;/Flight Date: July 30,

1956

EDR

1956 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=1000' Panel #: 41088-G3, Aurora North, IL;/Flight Date: July 30,

1956

EDR

1962 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Panel #: 41088-G3, Aurora North, IL;/Flight Date: April 10,

1962

EDR

1962 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Panel #: 41088-G3, Aurora North, IL;/Flight Date: April 10,

1962

EDR

1971 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=833' Panel #: 41088-G3, Aurora North, IL;/Flight Date: May 14,

1971

EDR

1971 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=833' Panel #: 41088-G3, Aurora North, IL;/Flight Date: May 14,

1971

EDR

1978 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=1000' Panel #: 41088-G3, Aurora North, IL;/Flight Date: October

30, 1978

EDR

1978 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=1000' Panel #: 41088-G3, Aurora North, IL;/Flight Date: October

30, 1978

EDR

1984 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=1000' Panel #: 41088-G3, Aurora North, IL;/Flight Date: April 28,

1984

EDR

1984 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=1000' Panel #: 41088-G3, Aurora North, IL;/Flight Date: April 28,

1984

EDR

1988 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Panel #: 41088-G3, Aurora North, IL;/Flight Date: April 29,

1988

EDR

1988 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Panel #: 41088-G3, Aurora North, IL;/Flight Date: April 29,

1988

EDR

1994 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Panel #: 41088-G3, Aurora North, IL;/Flight Date: March 31,

1994

EDR

1994 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Panel #: 41088-G3, Aurora North, IL;/Flight Date: March 31,

1994

EDR

1994 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=750' Panel #: 41088-G3, Aurora North, IL;/Flight Date: March 31,

1994

EDR

2800629.5

2
INQUIRY #:

YEAR:

2800629.5

1956

 = 1000'
INQUIRY #:

YEAR:

2800629.5

1956

 = 1000'
INQUIRY #:

YEAR:

2800629.5

1962

 = 750'
INQUIRY #:

YEAR:

2800629.5

1962

 = 750'
INQUIRY #:

YEAR:

2800629.5

1971

 = 833'
INQUIRY #:

YEAR:

2800629.5

1971

 = 833'
INQUIRY #:

YEAR:

2800629.5

1978

 = 1000'
INQUIRY #:

YEAR:

2800629.5

1978

 = 1000'
INQUIRY #:

YEAR:

2800629.5

1984

 = 1000'
INQUIRY #:

YEAR:

2800629.5

1984

 = 1000'
INQUIRY #:

YEAR:

2800629.5

1988

 = 750'
INQUIRY #:

YEAR:

2800629.5

1988

 = 750'
INQUIRY #:

YEAR:

2800629.5

1994

 = 750'
INQUIRY #:

YEAR:

2800629.5

1994

 = 750'
INQUIRY #:

YEAR:

2800629.5

1994

 = 750'
Eola Yard Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment

Aurora, IL June 2010 

Appendix F 

Resumes of HDR Personnel 

 

 

 

 

 

Education 

Bachelor of Science, Geology, Ohio State 

University, 1993 

Professional Registrations 

LEED Accredited Professional, US National 

Registration, No. N/A Issued: 11/30/2006 

Professional Affiliations 

Women's Transportation Seminar (WTS), 

Greater Chicago, President, Member, 2003-

Present 

American Council of Engineering 

Companies, ACEC-IL, Public Transportation 

Committee Chair, 2006-2009 

HDR Tenure 

2 Years 

Industry Tenure 

17 Years 

Robin S. Martel 

Transportation Planning Proj ect Manager

Professional Experience 

Ms. Martel has over 17 years of experience performing environmental engineering and 

transportation projects. She is a project manager in specific areas of expertise that includes 

NEPA documentation for public improvement and redevelopment projects; public 

involvement; transportation planning; environmental site assessments; and grant preparation 

and administration for federal and state funding. 

HDR Pr oj ect Exper i ence 

HDR Engineering, Canadian National and EJ&E Railroad Merger Environmental 

Impact Statement, Chicago, IL. Comment Coder. The study analyzed impacts CN acquired 

and operated over the EJ&E Railway, a 200-mile corridor located in northeastern Illinois and 

northwestern Indiana, about 40-miles outside Chicago. The potential impacts were compared 

to continuing operations on the separate facilities. The outreach program included 14 scoping 

meetings, 9 public meetings, and meetings with resource agencies, stakeholders, and elected 

officials. The Environmental Impact Statement also identified mitigation. 

Illinois Dept of Transportation, Chicago Region Environmental and Transportation 

Efficiency Program (CREATE), Environmental Documents, Chicago, IL. QA/QC 

Reviewer. The task order contract provided environmental documentation for various 

projects of the CREATE program. The CREATE program consists of 78 projects in five 

designated rail corridors and cost an estimated $1.5 billion. The projects range from railroad 

infrastructure, rail-to-rail fly-overs, new grade separations, and viaduct improvements. 

Lake County Division of Transportation, Fairfield Road Throughway Improvements 

Study, Round Lake, IL. Transportation Planning Lead. The Fairfield Road and the 

Metra/IL 134 Intersection Improvements Study (Section 08-104-08-BR) includes Phase I 

engineering services for the improvement of the intersection of Fairfield Road and the 

Metra/IL 134 located in the Villages of Round Lake and Round Lake Beach. Work includes 

the preparation of a Project Development Report that provides a recommended design of 

study alternatives. 

McHenry County Hwy. Department, Randall Road Improvements, McHenry, IL. 

Project Manager. HDR provided Phase I services for the widening/upgrading of 3.5-miles of 

Randall Road from County Line Road to Ackman Road. The study identified a 

comprehensive solution addressing the communities needs and complying with Federal Aid 

guidelines, utilizing a CSS approach, and integrating project goals and NEPA guidelines. 

The tasks included traffic, environmental, drainage, funding, and alternative analyses, 

preliminary design, documentation, public involvement, and access/incident management 

plans. 

S.B. Friedman & Company, Moline Transit-Oriented Development Study. Assistant 

Project Manager. The study included conceptual planning for an intermodal transit Center 

Station serving a major regional bus transfer station/terminal and proposed to add an Amtrak 

Passenger Rail Station, re-establishing passenger rail services to the Quad Cities. HDR's 

duties focused on existing conditions, ridership, program needs for transit modes, and 

funding strategies. 
Robin S. Mart el - Page 2 

Seneca I-80 Railport, Seneca I-80 Railport Intermodal, Seneca, IL. Deputy Project 

Manager. The project involves preparing an Environmental Assessment for the widening of 

US Route 6 to accommodate traffic related to the development of an intermodal railport 

along CSX Railroad adjacent to the Illinois River. The scope includes widening the roadway 

from a 2 to 5 lane urban cross section, two new intersections, signals and upgrading the 

interchange at I-80. A TIGER Grant application was prepared and submitted on behalf of 

Grundy County. 

Village of Burr Ridge, Madison Street Intersection Improvements Study, Burr Ridge, 

IL. Transportation Planner. The project included Phase I engineering and preliminary design 

for improvements at three consecutive intersections at Joliet Road, 79th Street and 83rd 

Street. Alternatives included roundabout, traffic signal and no action. This study complied 

with the Federal Aid guidelines, as federal funding was anticipated and was processed 

through IDOT BLRS. Significant stakeholders included IDOT, DuPage County, and the 

Village of Willowbrook. The study also included bike lanes though the corridor. 

Non-HDR Pr oj ect Exper i ence 

Ashland Chemical Company, Release Assessment, Calumet City, Illinois. Staff Scientist. 

Ms. Martel was responsible for the preparation of the Release Assessment (RA) Work Plan 

and reviewing historical data to assess the need for Interim Measures at the facility. The 

project included preparing a Quality Assurance Project Plan under the new requirements for 

the US EPA, Region V. All the documents were submitted to the US EPA, Region V. 

Ashland Chemical Company, Willow Springs, Illinois. Staff Scientist. Ms. Martel was 

responsible for report preparation, data management, and field coordination/sampling for 

RCRA facility. The project involved coordination and reporting activities with the Illinois 

Environmental Protection Agency. 

City of Chicago Department of Environment, Chicago, Illinois. Project 

Manager/Environmental Lead. Ms. Martel was responsible for the management and 

oversight of all City of Chicago, Department of Environment projects. The project included 

the redevelopment of Chicago Housing Authority's (CHA) public housing at Cabrini Green. 

Ms. Martel was responsible for the preparation of the Environmental Assessment (EA) 

according to the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines. Ms. 

Martel managed the technical staff and assisted in the analysis of the socioeconomic and 

natural environments to determine potential impacts. Ms. Martel was responsible for all 

public involvement and coordination with multiple stakeholders involved in the project. Ms. 

Martel assisted the project team with the Phase I, Phase II, and SRP reporting for the project. 

City of Rockford, Barber Coleman Village, Rockford, Illinois. Project Manager. The City 

of Rockford was awarded a USEPA Brownfield Assessment Grant for the Barber Colman 

Village, a former industrial complex redeveloped into a mixed use complex. Ms. Martel 

helped the City of Rockford prepare the grant application for the 2005 and 2007 funding 

cycle and was responsible for managing the environmental assessments for the property. 

Grundy County Department of Transportation, Ridge Road Phase I, Grundy County, 

Illinois. Environmental Lead. Ms. Martel prepared environmental documentation and 

coordination for the Phase I for the widening of Ridge Road and the replacement of the 

EJ&E Railroad bridge. 

GSA Federal Courthouse, Rockford, Illinois. Project Manager. Ms. Martel was 

responsible for the preparation of environmental documentation for the construction of a new 

Federal Courthouse in the City of Rockford. The EA was completed and a FONSI was 

issued for the project in November 2002. Environmental documentation for included a 

Phase I and Phase II site investigations and enrollment of the site into the Illinois Site 

Remediation Program. 
Robin S. Mart el - Page 3 

Illinois Department of Transportation, State Bicycle Plan, Springfield, Illinois. Project 

Manager. The State Bicycle Plan involved developing a set of criteria to enable IDOT to 

effectively prioritize the funding of bicycle facilities through their capital and enhancement 

funding programs. Ms. Martel conducted stakeholder meetings throughout the State to 

establish the priority criteria. 

Illinois State Tollway. Project Manager. Ms. Martel managed the environmental 

management and compliance services on a systemwide basis. The project included 

evaluating the operations and maintenance procedures at the tollway to determine federal, 

state, county, and local environmental regulations apply. The documentation included 

tollway procedures for environmental management, training schedules, permitting schedules, 

responsibility matrix, checklists, and environmental regulations and interpretations. 

Illinois State Tollway, Environmental Services Contract, Illinois. Project Manager. Ms. 

Martel managed the environmental services contract that included environmental site 

assessments, IEPA documentation, remediation oversite, remediation cost estimates, and 

litigation support. 

Metra, Belmont Avenue Road Grade Seperation, Downers Grove, Illinois. Project 

Manager. Ms. Martel managed the design of the railroad-highway grade separation. She was 

responsible for obtaining and coordinating resources to conduct an evaluation of the natural 

and socioeconomic impacts for several alternatives to the proposed project. Ms. Martel 

prepared the alternatives analysis, purpose and need, land acquisition/land use and 

environmental justice section of the EA. The EA was prepared according to NEPA and FTA 

Guidelines (UMTA Circular 5620.1). The FONSI was issued for the projects within 30 days 

by the FTA. FONSI received in June 2002. 

Metra, New Starts Projects, Illinois. Environmental Lead. Ms. Martel was responsible for 

the environmental assessments and preliminary engineering for the expansion/extension of 

three service corridors: the North Central Service, Union Pacific West Line, and Southwest 

Service. She also evaluated the floodway/floodplain impacts of the expansion program in 

addition to report preparation. 

Metra, Pingree Road Station, Crystal Lake, Illinois. Environmental Lead. Ms. Martel 

compiled the entire EA report for the construction of a new Metra station and parking lot. 

The project is located on Pingree Road. 

South Suburban Chicago Brownfield's Coalition, Chicago, Illinois. Project Manager. Ms. 

Martel was responsible for the Phase I and Phase II assessment activities for the US EPA 

Brownfield pilot grant. Ms. Martel prepared the IEPA Grant applications to secure additional 

funding for each of the five communities in the brownfield coalition. All five communities 

were awarded IEPA grants in 2002 and 2003. 

U.S EPA Brownfield's Assessment Pilot and Illinois EPA Brownfield Grant, Rockford, 

Illinois. Project Manager/Project Principle. Ms. Martel was responsible for the selection and 

cataloging of a 9.2-mile area for potential brownfield site and the preparation of Phase 1 

Environmental Site Assessments for the priority brownfield sites. Ms. Martel prepared the 

plans and reports and prepared IEPA grants for Rockford's brownfield program. She was 

responsible for public involvement activities associated with Rockford's brownfield program. 

The City of Rockford was awarded both USEPA grants $400k and $240k in state grants. 

U.S. Steel Gary Works, Gary, Indiana. Project Manager. Ms. Martel assisted in the 

preparation of a public involvement plan for the RCRA facility investigation activities at the 

active U.S. Steel site. The public input and participation was an essential element to ensuring 

unimpeded progress in these programs. 

 

 

 

 

 

Education 

Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, 

Purdue University, 2005 

Professional Registrations 

Professional Engineer, Illinois, No. 

062062611 Issued: 06/07/2010, Expires: 

11/30/2011 

Professional Affiliations 

Women's Transportation Seminar (WTS), 

Chicago, Member, 2009-Present 

HDR Tenure 

5 Years 

Industry Tenure 

5 Years 

Kirsten Mawhinney, PE 

Professional Experience 

Ms. Mawhinney has been actively involved in numerous transportation planning projects. 

Her experience includes transportation planning, environmental studies, public involvement, 

and grant preparation. She also has a high proficiency in computer skills such as: 

Microstation, GEOPAK, Arc GIS 9, HCS, Adobe Acrobat Professional, COREL Graphics 

Suite, and Microsoft Office. 

HDR Pr oj ect Exper i ence 

City of Chicago, Chicago Avenue Rehabilitation, Phase II, Chicago, IL. Transportation 

Planning EI. HDR completed Phase II widening and intersection improvements for the 

reconstruction on Chicago Avenue. Phase II responsibilities included the development of 

PS&E's for two separate roadway plans for 5-miles of widening, utility coordination, 

resurfacing, signalization, MOT, and 19 intersection modifications along the four lane urban 

roadway. 

City of Chicago, Chicago Department of Transportation, STP Traffic Signal 

Modernization. Transportation Planning EI. HDR was selected to provide design services 

for the modernization of ten intersections for traffic counts, surveys, intersection traffic 

operation models, timing schedules, traffic signal requirement drawings, traffic signal 

control plan sheets, pavement restoration sheets, marking and signing sheets, and detailed 

cost estimates. HDR also prepared a bid package of 14 intersections requiring coordination 

with various consultant groups and reviewing entities. 

City of Chicago, Fullerton Bridge over Lincoln Park Lagoon, Phase I, Chicago, IL. 

Transportation Planning EI. HDR was selected for Phase I engineering services for the 

replacement of the Fullerton Parkway Bridge and an adjacent pedestrian underpass. The 

replacement bridge is wider and replaced a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete 

bridge in the heart of Lincoln Park. 

Clark Dietz, Inc., East Side Highway Corridor Study, Bloomington, IL. Transportation 

Planning EI. The study identified a highway corridor east of Bloomington-Normal, between 

I-74 south and I-55 north. The facility addresses future transportation capacity deficiencies 

and included an evaluation of the potential impacts on the social, economic, and 

environmental resources. A preferred corridor was recommended for use in further detailed 

design and environmental studies. The IDOT approach to Context Sensitive Solutions was 

used. 

Cook County DOH, Traffic Engineering Services, Cook County, Illinois, Chicago, IL. 

Transportation Planning EI. HDR was selected to provide various traffic engineering 

services at various locations the County. The Scope of Services includes any or all of the 

following services based on individual work order assignments: Perform 24-hour machine 

counts, Perform 12-hour or 16-hour manual traffic counts, intersection and link traffic 

projections, speed analysis, prepare warrant studies, Intersection Design Study in IDOT or 

County format, and perform work order task assignments as directed by the County. 

HDR Engineering, Canadian National and EJ&E Railroad Merger Environmental 

Impact Statement, Chicago, IL. Transportation Planning EI. The study analyzed impacts 

CN acquired and operated over the EJ&E Railway, a 200-mile corridor located in 
Kirsten Mawhinney - Page 2 

northeastern Illinois and northwestern Indiana, about 40-miles outside Chicago. The 

potential impacts were compared to continuing operations on the separate facilities. The 

outreach program included 14 scoping meetings, 9 public meetings, and meetings with 

resource agencies, stakeholders, and elected officials. The Environmental Impact Statement 

also identified mitigation. 

Illinois Dept of Transportation, Chicago Region Environmental and Transportation 

Efficiency Program (CREATE), Environmental Documents, Chicago, IL. 

Transportation Planning EI. The task order contract provided environmental documentation 

for various projects of the CREATE program. The CREATE program consists of 78 projects 

in five designated rail corridors and cost an estimated $1.5 billion. The projects range from 

railroad infrastructure, rail-to-rail fly-overs, new grade separations, and viaduct 

improvements. 

Illinois Dept of Transportation, FA 309, US-30 Corridor Study, IL. Transportation 

Planning EI. HDR completed a 19-mile corridor study of US Route 30 in northwestern 

Illinois. The study included the evaluation of the feasibility of several corridors based on 

social, economic, environmental, and engineering issues. The tasks included evaluation of 

potential impacts to environmental resources including wetlands, cultural resources, 

floodplains, Section 4(f) properties, and noise impacts. 

Illinois Dept of Transportation, FAP 332, Illinois 394 Improvements, Phase I, from I-80 

South to Will / Kankakee County Line, IL. Transportation Planning EI. HDR completed 

an Environmental Class of Action Determination Phase I study for IL-394. The project 

involved operational and environmental evaluation of widening and upgrading 14.5-miles of 

rural arterial to access controlled freeway. The work tasks included alternative analysis, 

traffic analysis, conceptual/preliminary design, cost estimates, agency coordination, and 

public involvement. Ms. Mawhinney's responsibilities included water quality data collection 

and interchange design studies. 

Illinois Dept of Transportation, US Route 51 (FAP 322) EIS, CR 900 N (South of Pana) 

to CR 2150 N (East of Irvington), IL. Transportation Planning EI. This project was 

completed by the US 51 Partners, a joint venture between HDR and Clark Dietz, with their 

sub-consultants Huff & Huff and Lin Engineering for the study, preparation, and submission 

of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and a design report for US 51 along a 70-mile 

corridor in central Illinois. The study included the evaluation of the feasibility of several 

alignments based on social, economic, environmental and engineering issues. 

Illinois State Toll Hwy. Authority, ISTHA I-90 Plazas 1, 5 & 7 Open Road Tolling, IL. 

Transportation Planning EI. HDR was selected to design three independent roadway 

segments and other major features for three toll plazas on the Northwest Tollway I-90. The 

project included roadway work, toll plaza design, toll facilities, bridge and culvert 

replacement, structure removals, drainage, lighting, and associated utility work. The roadway 

geometrics included the reconfiguration of three half-mile sections of the toll plaza corridors 

to accommodate the layout of the high-speed I-Pass lanes. 

Illinois State Toll Hwy. Authority, Tri-State Tollway/I-57 Interchange Environmental 

Assessment. Transportation Planning EI. The project involved agency coordination, public 

involvement, preliminary design, traffic analysis, environmental evaluation, and 

documentation. The tasks included the development of an access justification report, 

coordination with various environmental agencies, and coordination with other projects 

within the corridor. The environmental impact evaluation included biological resources, 

traffic noise, special waste sites, agricultural resources, social/economic resources, and 

public involvement. 

Kane County, Kane County Randall Road, US 20, Foothill Drive Intersection 
Kirsten Mawhinney - Page 3 

Improvements, Elgin, IL. Transportation Planning EI. HDR was selected for Phase I 

engineering and preparation of preliminary design for improvements in the City of Elgin. 

The study complies with the Federal Aid guidelines, as federal funding was anticipated. 

HDRs approach integrated the project goals and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 

guidelines to provide a comprehensive solution. 

Lake County Division of Transportation, Fairfield Road Throughway Improvements 

Study, Round Lake, IL. Transportation Planning EI. The Fairfield Road Throughway 

Improvements Study included Phase I engineering services for the improvement of the 

intersection between Fairfield road and the Metra Railroad/IL-134. The work included the 

preparation of a project development report recommending design of study alternatives of a 

railroad grade separation with or without a grade separated interchange of the existing 

intersection. 

Lake County Division of Transportation, Riverwoods Road and Everett Road 

Intersection Improvements Study, Mettawa, IL. Transportation Planning EI. HDR 

completed the Phase I study of improvements to the intersection of Riverwoods Road and 

Everett Road. The alternatives analysis focused on the evaluation and comparison of traffic 

signal alternatives and roundabout alternatives. A simulation model of these two alternatives 

was developed using VISSIM for a visual comparison of the two alternatives. The specific 

tasks included traffic analyses, evaluation of impacts to environmental resources, 

preliminary design, and cost estimates. The operational analysis of the roundabout was 

completed using SIDRA. The public involvement aspect utilized Context Sensitive Solutions 

(CSS). 

McHenry County Hwy. Department, Randall Road Improvements, McHenry, IL. 

Transportation Planning EI. HDR provided Phase I services for the widening/upgrading of 

3.5-miles of Randall Road from County Line Road to Ackman Road. The study identified a 

comprehensive solution addressing the communities needs and complying with Federal Aid 

guidelines, utilizing a CSS approach, and integrating project goals and NEPA guidelines. 

The tasks included traffic, environmental, drainage, funding, and alternative analyses, 

preliminary design, documentation, public involvement, and access/incident management 

plans. 

Ohio County Commission, Proposed I-70 Interchange and Access Road Environmental 

Assessment (EA), Wheeling, WV. Transportation Planning EI. The project included the 

development and evaluation of I-70 interchange alternatives and an access road. Four 

alternatives were evaluated based on traffic operations and environmental impacts. The 

environmental issues included floodplains and wetlands. The specific tasks included a traffic 

noise analysis, farmland study, floodplains analysis, and wetland impact evaluation. 

Village of Burr Ridge, Madison Street Intersection Improvements Study, Burr Ridge, 

IL. Transportation Planning EI. Phase I engineering and preliminary design for the project 

included improving three consecutive intersections at Joliet Road, 79th, and 83rd Streets. 

The alternatives included roundabout, traffic signal, and no-action. The study complies with 

the Federal Aid guidelines, as federal funding was anticipated and processed through IDOT 

BLRS. The significant stakeholders included IDOT, DuPage County, and the Village of 

Willowbrook. The study also includes bike lanes though the corridor. 

 

 

 

 

 

Education 

Master of Science, Pharmaceutical 

Sciences, University of NE Medical Center, 

1991 

Bachelor of Science, Chemistry, University 

of Nebraska Lincoln, 1987 

Professional Registrations 

Nevada Certified Environmental Manager, 

Nevada, No. EM-1924 Issued: 01/26/2007, 

Expires: 01/26/2011 

Nebraska Water Well Monitoring 

Technician, Nebraska, No. 79506 Issued: 

1/16/2007, Expires: 12/31/2010 

Professional Affiliations 

Society of American Military Engineers 

(SAME), Omaha, Member 

Toastmasters International, Omaha, 

Member 

HDR Tenure 

6 Years 

Industry Tenure 

18 Years 

Todd C. Wilson 

Program/ Proj ect Chemist

Professional Experience 

Mr. Wilson has experience providing advice on complex chemistry problems arising at, and 

management of hazardous toxic and radioactive waste (HTRW) sites across the country. He 

advises on or performs chemical sampling, testing, and analysis of wastes. Completes field 

audits and review of laboratory Chemical Quality Assurance and Health and Safety 

requirements. He recommends appropriate disposal, treatment, or processing requirements of 

materials based on the chemical properties of the waste to ensure compliance with all 

applicable laws and regulations. He prepares Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPP), 

Sampling and Analysis Plans (SAP) and Field Sampling Plan (FSP) for HTRW 

Environmental Restoration Contracts. He provides onsite training and auditing of personnel 

to ensure adherence to the work plans. He investigates, analyzes, directs, and manages 

investigations of site operations to determine the presence and concentration of toxic and 

hazardous chemicals. He reviews sampling, testing, and analysis of reports to verify the 

accuracy and adequacy of the data; and to ensure compliance with contract requirements and 

conformance with accepted procedures to all applicable laws and regulations. He completes 

risk evaluations and assessments. He ensures accurate sampling and scientifically defensible 

data on which corrective action decisions are made. He interprets federal and state 

regulations, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and Department of Defense (DOD) 

manuals and directives. Conducts negotiations with contractors, customers, public, legal, and 

regulatory agencies. He evaluates innovative technologies (including natural attenuation and 

in situ technologies) for applications in the remediation of HTRW sites and assists in the 

design of bench- and pilot-scale remediation systems to determine applicability of the 

technology(ies) for full scale remediation of HTRW sites. He has evaluated a number of 

sites for dioxins, furans, and PCBs for various TSCA issues. This includes the evaluation of 

congener data and Total Equivalency Factors (TEFs) from the manufacturing/application of 

Herbicide Orange/Purple or due to power generation. The following projects represent a 

general sampling of Mr. Wilson's experience: 

HDR Pensacola, Okaloosa County Landfills Environmental Compliance Services, FL. 

Project Chemist. HDR is contracted to provide environmental compliance services to 

Okaloosa County at four closed landfills: Niceville Landfill, Wright Landfill, Laurel Hill 

Landfill, and Baker Landfill. Services provided for the County include the management of 

the permit required monitoring programs and associated remedial investigations & actions 

focusing on proactively protecting the environment while reducing the owners long term 

liability. Management of these programs include the coordination of sampling activities 

with the County's contracted laboratory, data review, submittal of semi-annual reports, 

coordination of resampling events, biennial reporting, and as needed compliance assistance. 

HDR is evaluating monitoring programs seeking to optimize the assessment monitoring 

programs at each landfill by reducing the number of wells by eliminating redundancy, 

reducing sampling frequency, and reducing the number of parameters to minimize the O&M 

costs while still providing sufficient data for the detection and assessment programs. As part 

of this optimization program changes have been made to sampling protocols and procedures 

to minimize sample turbidity thereby reducing detected metal concentrations. HDR worked 

closely with FDEP to implement these changes. In this region of the Panhandle iron 

concentrations in the groundwater are problematic. Altered redox conditions beneath the 

landfill cause naturally occurring iron to solubilize and migrate in the groundwater. HDR is 
Todd C. Wilson - Page 2 

working with the FDEP to address this concern with innovative methods. 

Loup Power District, FERC Relicensing. Provided advice, programs, designs, plans, 

specifications, recommendations, reports, studies & other support services associated with 

preparation and filing of application for new FERC license. Fish tissue was collected and 

analyzed for PCBs due to an existing health warning. HDR also prepared licensing 

compliance support and 9 & 10th Part 12 inspection reports. 

USACE - Kansas City District, Imperial Oil Superfund. Project Chemist. Reviewed 

previous documents for data gap analysis. Worked with Regional office, USACE and EPA 

to complete a supplemental investigation. The remedial design for Operable Unit 3 included 

demolition, decontamination, and disposal of below ground and above ground structures; the 

removal and off-site disposal of floating product and the excavation and off-site disposal of 

contaminated soil and other secondary waste streams at the site. Primary contaminants at the 

site include arsenic, lead and PCBs. The remedy also included installation of a hydraulic 

barrier, excavation, dewatering, water treatment along with restoration of the site and 

impacted wetlands. 

USACE - Kansas City District, McConnell Solid Waste Management Unit 207, 

Supplemental RCRA Facility Investigation, KS. Project Chemist. Conducted a 

Supplemental Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facility Investigation at Solid 

Waste Management Unit 207 at McConnell Air Force Base in Wichita, Kansas. Tasks 

included development of a site conceptual exposure model using the Environmental 

Protection Agency's Data Quality Objectives process, field investigation activities, and a 

human health risk assessment. 

Eglin AFB, Fort Walton Beach, Florida. Project Chemist. Mr. Wilson was involved with 

the Environmental Restoration Program (ERP) for Eglin AFB under the Air Force Materiel 

Command (AFMC). Mr. Wilson was responsible for the review of chemistry issues for 

multiple sites including low-level radioactive materials sites containing depleted uranium 

(DU), magnesium-thorium, and other low-level radioactive materials, landfill monitoring 

sites, dioxin, petroleum, solvent and arsenic (cattle dipping) sites. He assisted in writing the 

basewide health and safety plan, QAPP, and the Florida Comprehensive Quality Assurance 

Plan (CompQAP). The CompQAP is used by the Eglin Bioenvironmental Engineering 

(BEE) personnel to train employees on the proper collection, documentation and analytical 

requirements for base operations. Mr. Wilson provided training to BEE personnel, and also 

assisted the Eglin PM to evaluate, investigate and remediate existing Herbicide 

Orange/Purple loading, spraying and testing facilities at several locations on Eglin AFB. 

Pueblo Chemical Depot (PCD), Pueblo, Colorado. Project Manager. Mr. Wilson was 

involved with management of Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) operations on PCD. 

Mr. Wilson performed reviews of chemistry issues including the Colorado Department of 

Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) issued Compliance Orders and Compliance 

Advisory requirements issued by the state of Colorado. Mr. Wilson assisted in establishing 

and auditing an onsite analytical laboratory for the analysis of explosives by U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8330 (HPLC) and 8321A (HPLC/MS). He 

completed extensive negotiations with Army Environmental Center (AEC), PCD, CDPHE, 

and EPA on work plans, QAPPs, Corrective Management Monitoring Plans (CMMP), and 

other primary documents. 
Attachments Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Attachment 2 

Wyanet Connection PESA 

lOOT Sequence #: 15795

lOOT Job #: NA

PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

FINAL REPORT

ISGS: 2191

DATE:

lOOT DESIGN DATE:

DATE REQUEST RECEIVED:

LOCATION:

April 8, 2010

May 15,2010

April 1, 2010

Proposed track connection between the BNSF and IAIS

railroads near Wyanet, Bureau County; Wyanet quadrangle

(USGS 7.5-minute topographic map), T16N, R8E, Sections

19 and 20.
2

Table of Contents

GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

BACKGROUND 6

Introduction 6

Geology 6

Hydrogeology 7

DISCUSSION 7

Man-Made Hazards 7

Natural Hazards 10

CONCLUSIONS 11

ENDORSEMENTS 11

ADDRESS LISTINGS 12

INFORMATION SOURCES 13

APPENDIX 17

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS 19
3

GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS

AAI All Appropriate Inquiries MSDS - Material Safety Data Sheet

ACM Asbestos-Containing Material MTBE methyl tertiary-butyl ether

AST Aboveground Storage Tank NFR No Further Remediation

ASTM American Society for Testing and NFRAP - No Further Remedial Action

Materials Planned

AULs Activity and Use Limitations NIPC Northeastern Illinois Planning

(includes institutional controls, Commission

engineered barriers, and HAAs) NPL National Priorities List

BNSF Burlington Northern and Santa Fe NRCS - Natural Resources Conservation

BOL Bureau of Land (IEPA) Service (formerly Soil Conservation

BTEX Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Service)

and total Xylenes OSFM - Office of the State Fire Marshal

it Centerline PAA Permit Access Agreement

CERCLlS- Comprehensive Environmental PAH/PNA- Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbon

Response, Compensation, and PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyl

Liability Information System PESA Preliminary Environmental Site

FEMA - Federal Emergency Management Assessment

Agency P.G. Professional Geologist

FID Flame Ionization Detector PID Photoionization Detector

FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map ppb parts per billion (equivalent to \.Ig/kg

GC Gas Chromatograph for solids, and \.Ig/I in liquids)

HAA Highway Authority Agreement ppm parts per million (equivalent to

IAIS Iowa Interstate (railroad) mg/kg in solids, and mg/I in liquids)

ICC Illinois Commerce Commission PRP Potentially Responsible Party

IDNR Illinois Department of Natural RCRA - Resource Conservation and

Resources Recovery Act

IDOT Illinois Department of REC Recognized Environmental

Transportation Condition

lEMA Illinois Emergency Management ROW Right-of-Way

Agency SIC Standard Industrial Classification

IEPA Illinois Environmental Protection SRP Site Remediation Program

Agency TACO Tiered Approach to Cleanup

IMD Illinois Manufacturers Directory Objectives

ISD Illinois Services Directory TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching

ISGS Illinois State Geological Survey Procedure

ISTC Illinois Sustainable Technology TRI Toxic Release Inventory

Center (formerly Waste TVOC Total Volatile Organic Compound

Management and Research USDA - United States Department of

Center) Agriculture

ISV Initial Site Visit USEPA - United States Environmental

ISWS Illinois State Water Survey Protection Agency

LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank USGS - United States Geological Survey

\.Ig/kg micrograms per kilogram (ppb) UST Underground Storage Tank

\.Ig/I micrograms per liter (ppb) VOC Volatile Organic Compound

mg/kg milligrams per kilogram (ppm)

mg/I milligrams per liter (ppm)

M.P. Milepost
4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report presents the results of an environmental site assessment for this proposed railroad

track connection of the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe (BNSF) and Iowa Interstate (IAIS)

railroads near Wyanet, Bureau County. This report was prepared on behalf of the Illinois

Department of Transportation (lOOT) by the Illinois State Geological Survey (ISGS).

The following sites were examined for this project. The tables below list sites along the project for

which recognized environmental conditions (RECs)* were identified for each address or address

range (Table 1); sites along the project for which only de minimis conditions were identified (Table

2); sites along the project for which no RECs were identified (Table 3); and sites adjacent to but

not on the project that were identified on environmental databases (Table 4). Further investigation

of sites with RECs may be desired.

Table 1. The following sites along the project were determined to contain RECs:

Property name ISGS REC(s), including de Regulatory Land use

IDOT parcel # site # minimis conditions database(s)

Railroad Track 2191-1 AST; potential None Agricultural!

Connection Area chemical presence; railroad

NA solid waste; unusual

or noxious odors;

likely pesticide and/or

herbicide use;

potential lead paint

Table 2. The following sites along the project were determined to contain de minimis

conditions only:

Property name ISGS De minimis condition(s) Land use

IDOT parcel # site #

None

Table 3. The following sites along the project were determined not to contain RECs or de

minimis conditions:

Property name ISGS Land use

lOOT parcel # site #

Pond Creek 2191-2 Creek

NA
5

Table 4. The following additional sites, adjacent to but not on the project, were identified

on environmental databases:

Property name ISGS Regulatory Land use

site # database(s)

None

* For all sites:

Where REC(s) are indicated as present, a condition was noted that may be indicative of

releases or potential releases of hazardous substances on, at, in, or to the site, as

discussed in the text. Potential hazards were not verified by ISGS testing. Radon,

biological hazards (such as mold, medical waste, or septic waste), and non-agricultural

pesticides and/or herbicides may also be of concern. No further investigation concerning

the presence or use of these factors was conducted for this PESA.

Where RECs are not indicated as present, radon, biological hazards (such as mold,

medical waste, or septic waste), and non-agricultural pesticides and/or herbicides may still

be of concern. No further investigation concerning the presence or use of these factors

was conducted for this PESA.

For the purposes of this report, the following are considered to be de minimis conditions:

• Normal use of lead-based paint on exteriors and interiors of buildings and structures.

• Use of asbestos-containing materials in building construction.

• Transformers in normal use, unless the transformers were observed to be leaking, appear

on an environmental regulatory list, or were otherwise determined to pose a hazard not

related to normal use.

Agricultural use of pesticides and herbicides. In addition, most land in Illinois was under

agricultural use prior to its conversion to residential, industrial, or commercial development.

Pesticides, both regulated and otherwise, may have been used throughout the project area

at any time. Unless specifically discussed elsewhere in this report, no information regarding

past pesticide use that would be subject to enforcement action was located for this project,

and such use is considered a de minimis condition.

Radon and biological hazards are not considered in this PESA unless specifically noted.

NA =No parcel number was supplied by lOOT for this site.

Although potential natural hazards and undermining, if present, are described in this report, they

are not considered as RECs or de minimis conditions for the purposes of this report, and are

therefore not listed in the tables above.
6

BACKGROUND

Introduction

This is the Final Report of a preliminary environmental assessment by the ISGS of natural and

man-made hazards that may be encountered for this proposed BNSF and IAIS railroad track

connection project near Wyanet, Bureau County (Attachment 1). The project requires the

acquisition of 2.8 hectares (7 acres) of new ROWand includes in-stream work. No building

modification or demolition is expected, and it is unknown whether any subsurface utility relocation

or excavation is to occur. No stationing information was provided by lOOT for this project. This

report identifies and evaluates recognized environmental conditions (RECs) that may be indicative

of releases or potential releases of hazardous substances on, at, in, or to the proposed project.

This assessment has been prepared using historical and geological information including aerial

photographs, U.S. Geological Survey topographic maps, plat maps, file information of the ISGS

and other state agencies, and various other sources of information. An on-site investigation has

been completed. The specific methods used to conduct the assessment are contained in "A

Manual for Conducting Preliminary Environmental Site Assessments for Illinois Department of

Transportation Highway Projects" (Erdmann et aI., 1996, and revisions in preparation). If new

environmental information is received concerning this site, this report will be updated accordingly

and the information made part of the permanent file. If such information is considered to have a

significant impact on the findings of this report, the report will be corrected by addendum and

resubmitted to lOOT Bureau of Design and Environment.

This Preliminary Environmental SiteAssessment (PESA) was performed in compliance with

the IDOT-ISGS PESA Manual (Erdmann et al., 1996, and revisions in preparation) and not

with the All Appropriate Inquiries environmental assessment standard (40 CFR Part 312)that

took effect on November 1, 2006.

Geology

Bedrock geology. The topmost bedrock unit is Pennsylvanian-age bedrock of the Tradewater

Formation. The Tradewater Formation consists of elongate sandstone sheets that may contain

clay and mica, and may also contain local areas of limestone and coal measures.

Surficial geology. The thickness of surficial deposits in the project area are between 30 and 61

m (100 and 200 ft). The uppermost 15 m (49 ft) consists of less than 6 m (20 ft) of Peoria Silt,

described as light yellow to gray silt, that is underlain by greater than 6 m (20 ft) of the Wedron

Group, made up of primarily loamy and sandy glacial material in this area.

Soils. None of the soils along the project ROW have been classified as hydric soils by the

NRCS. Non-prime farmland soils along the ROW are the Rodman gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 5

percent slopes; Rodman gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes; and the Hennepin loam, 35

to 70 percent slopes.
7

Hydrogeology

Due to project type or IDOT internal procedure, the sections on surficial public water supplies,

groundwater recharge, groundwater protection areas, potential for contamination of shallow

aquifers, and well log information are not included in this report.

Drainage direction. Surficial drainage in the project area is generally toward Pond Creek which

essentially bisects the project area; Pond Creek flows toward the southeast. However, the BNSF

and IAIS train tracks are substantially built up in this area creating local drainage divides that

disrupt local drainage from its natural flow patterns, but all the runoff eventually makes its way into

Pond Creek.

Neither the near-surface nor the shallow unconfined groundwater flow direction was specifically

determined for this project, but they generally mimic local topography.

DISCUSSION

Man-Made Hazards

The project area is primarily under commercial (railroad) and agricultural use. Attachment 1

contains a project location map. Attachment 2 contains a map of all sites discussed in this report.

The most recent versions of the OSFM's UST database, IEPA's LUST database, IEPA's Bureau

of Land database, and USEPA's CERCUS database utilized for this report were dated April 7,

2010, April 5, 2010, April 7, 2010, and April 6,2010, respectively. IEPA files were reviewed on

March 31, 2010. No OSFM or USEPA files were reviewed for this project. Field work for this

project was conducted on April 2, 2010.

Data gaps applicable to the entire project area

The following data gaps applicable to the entire project area were noted for this project. Data gaps

specific to individual sites are discussed in the site writeups below.

(1) Although Sanborn Fire Insurance maps were present for the town of Wyanet, they did not

extend far enough west to cover the project area.

(2) Aerial photographs provided information only for those specific times covered by the

photographs, as noted in the Information Sources section. No records were available for

intervening years, and other land uses could have occurred in these years.

Site 2191-1: Railroad Track Connection Area, no address, Wyanet (Attachment 2). This area

consists of a mixture of agricultural land, undeveloped land, and railroad ROW. The railroad ROW

consists of the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad running from the northeast to

southwest, and the Iowa Interstate (IAIS) railroad, running in approximately an east-west direction

in this area. Along the BNSF railroad line, agricultural fields were present north of the IAIS railroad.

South of the IAIS railroad the land was either forested or undeveloped weed-covered land. The

IAIS railroad was located within the floodplain of Pond Creek, but was built up approximately 5 m

(15 ft) above the natural ground level. Trees lined both the north and south sides of the tracks and
8

Pond Creek crossed beneath it just west of the intersection with the BNSF railroad.

During a site visit, several areas (marked as A on Attachment 2) contained piles of 19-1iter (5-

gallon) plastic and metal buckets with labels on them identifying them as "railroad curve grease".

Some of the labels identified the grease as soy-based and biodegradable; others were petroleumbased. There were approximately 50 buckets total on the north side of the IAIS tracks and a

scattered few on the south side of the tracks. A slight smell of petroleum was noted in close

proximity to the buckets. Also noted along the south side of the tracks was a large pile of metal

debris (approximate location marked as B on Attachment 2). The debris appeared to have been

dumped down the slope from the adjoining agricultural field to the south and contained an AST,

metal grain bins, metal drainage culvert, wire fencing, and corrugated sheeting. The debris did not

appear to be on current railroad ROW, stopping right at the fence line between the railroad and

adjoining property, but appears to be in the proposed corridor being scoped for this project. In

addition, the IAIS railroad had numerous piles of used railroad ties (containing around 20 used

railroad ties per pile) located primarily on the north side of the tracks; the piles were spaced

approximately every 12 m (40 ft). Scattered loose used railroad ties were also located throughout

the length of both rail lines. This site was not listed on any of the regulatory lists checked for this

project.

Plat maps from 1875 show the railroad tracks present and their intersection was labeled "Junction

Station". A small building is also shown on this map in the west quadrant of their intersection. Plat

maps from 1903 show the building was gone but label the intersection "Railroad Jct". Plat maps

from 1938 to 2005 show both railroad tracks present throughout this period and show the

surrounding land under individual use. Aerial photographs from 1941 to 2007 show this site in

essentially the same configuration as it is currently.

No visual evidence of stressed vegetation, depressions, mounding or soil piles, lagoons or surface

impoundments, stained soil or pavement, water discoloration, fill, pumps or dispensers, protruding

pipes, pipelines, drums, monitoring wells, pits, transformers, non-petroleum chemical use or

storage were noted at this site during a site visit by ISGS on April 2, 2010.

No data gaps were identified for this site.

Although there are no buildings present, some of the demolition debris was painted and may

therefore contain lead-based paint. However, none of demolition debris appeared to contain

asbestos-containing material so it is unlikely to be present at this site.

The following RECs were identified at this site: AST; potential chemical presence as noted above;

solid waste; unusual or noxious odors.

The following de minimis conditions were identified at this site: Likely pesticide and/or herbicide use

based on agricultural land use; potential lead-based paint.

Site 2191-2: Pond Creek, no address, Wyanet (Attachment 2). This southward-flowing creek

runs along the north side of the IAIS railroad tracks and crosses under it just west of the

intersection of the BNSF and IAIS railroads. According to the 2008 IEPA Water Quality Report,

Pond Creek has not been assessed for water quality in the project area. This site was not listed

on any of the regulatory lists checked for this project.
9

No visual evidence of stressed vegetation, depressions, mounding or soil piles, lagoons or surface

impoundments, stained soil or pavement, water discoloration, fill, storage tanks (above or

underground), pumps or dispensers, protruding pipes, pipelines, drums, monitoring wells, pits, solid

waste, transformers, non-petroleum chemical use or storage, or unusual or noxious odors were

noted at this site during a site visit by ISGS on April 2, 2010.

No data gaps were identified for this site.

Because there are no buildings present and no evidence of fill or demolition debris was observed,

asbestos-containing materials and lead paint are unlikely to be present at this site.

No RECS or de minimis conditions were identified at this site.

Other potential man-made hazards

Properties adjacent to the proposed project that appear on regulatory lists. The ISGS

conducted a search of federal, state, and other environmental databases for sites with reported

environmental concerns on sites adjacent to the proposed project. For certain resources, the

search distances may have been expanded when deemed applicable in the judgment of the

environmental professional. Refer to the Appendix for complete citations for these databases and

the date of last update of each database. Sites along the project are listed in the preceding

section. The following sites adjacent to the project but not along the project were identified.

Federal records:

CERCUS: NPL, Active, and Archived

None.

RCRA sites subject to corrective action (CORRACTS)

None.

RCRA sites - non-CORRACTS TSD

None.

RCRA sites - other

None.

Brownfields pilot sites

None.

State records:

Leaking underground storage tanks (LUST)

None.

Registered underground storage tanks (UST)

None.
10

Landfills, disposal sites, and solid waste management facilities

None.

Activity and Use Limitations (including Institutional controls, engineered barriers, and Highway

Authority Agreements

None.

Brownfields

None.

IEPA Bureau of Land Inventory

None.

IEPA Site Remediation Program

Non-LUST spill incidents

None.

Tribal records: There are no tribally owned lands in the state of Illinois; therefore, the checking

of tribal records is not applicable for this report.

Natural Hazards

Wetlands. According to National Wetlands Inventory maps, two wetlands have been mapped in

the project area. One is a palustrine emergent forested wetland located at the far eastern project

limit, and the second is a palustrine forested broad-leafed deciduous temporary wetland located

just southeast of where Pond Creek crosses under the IAIS railroad tracks. These wetlands maps

were defined primarily by aerial photographs, which may reflect conditions specific to the year or

season that the photography was completed. Therefore, wetlands areas may be either overstated

or missing entirely.

Floodplains. According to Flood Insurance Rate maps, the project route crosses the Special

Flood Hazard Area (land area subject to inundation by a flood that has a 1% probability of being

equaled or exceeded in any given year) of Pond Creek. Flooding, standing water, and saturated

soils may be encountered in this area, particularly during periods of high or extended rainfall or

spring snowmelt.

No other observed or known natural hazards were identified for this project.
11

CONCLUSIONS

(1) RECs were identified at the following site along the project:

Site 2191-1: Railroad Track Connection Area. AST; potential chemical presence;

solid waste; unusual or noxious odors; likely pesticide and/or herbicide use;

potential lead paint.

(2) No RECs or de minimis conditions were identified at the following site along the project:

• Site 2191-2: Pond Creek.

(3) No properties that appear on environmental databases as listed in the text were identified

on sites adjacent to the proposed project.

(4) According to Flood Insurance Rate maps, the project route crosses the Special Flood

Hazard Area (land area subject to inundation by a flood that has a 1% probability of being

equaled or exceeded in any given year) of Pond Creek. Flooding, standing water, and

saturated soils may be encountered in this area, particularly during periods of high or

extended rainfall or spring snowmelt.

(5) For the purposes of this report, the following are considered to be de minimis conditions:

• Normal use of lead-based paint on exteriors and interiors of buildings and structures.

Use of asbestos-containing materials in building construction.

• Transformers in normal use, unless the transformers were observed to be leaking, appear

on an environmental regulatory list, or were otherwise determined to pose a hazard not

related to normal use.

• Agricultural use of pesticides and herbicides. In addition, most land in Illinois was under

agricultural use prior to its conversion to residential, industrial, or commercial development.

Pesticides, both regulated and otherwise, may have been used throughout the project area

at any time. Unless specifically discussed elsewhere in this report, no information regarding

past pesticide use that would be SUbject to enforcement action was located for this project,

and such use is considered a de minimis condition.

ENDORSEMENTS

Project Manager:

Approved:

Date: '1-8-/ 0
12

ADDRESS LISTINGS

The following addresses along the project were evaluated for this project. Addresses of sites, if

any, adjacent to the proposed project but not along the project are not listed here; see text for

discussion of these sites.

Property name and address ISGS site # Parcel #

Railroad Track Connection Area 2191-1 NA

no address, Wyanet

Pond Creek 2191-2 NA

no address, Wyanet
13

INFORMATION SOURCES

Lists, Databases, and Publications

Bannon-Nilles, P.L., Ousley, JR., Krick, M., and Raymond, L. (October 1999). A directory of

Illinois libraries: Historical resources for environmental site assessments. Illinois State

Geological Survey Open File Series 1999-8.

Erdmann, A.L., Bauer, R.A., Bannon, P.L., and Schneider, N.P. (1996, and revisions in prep). A

manual for conducting preliminary environmental site assessments for Illinois Department

of Transportation highway projects. Illinois State Geological Survey Open File Series 1996-

5.

Illinois Department of Transportation Site Assessment Tracking System: frostycap.isgs.uiuc.edu/

idot extranet.

Illinois Emergency Management Agency (September 22, 2007). Incident database:

http://tier2.iema.state.il.us/FOIAHazmatSearch/

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land (February 11, 2010). Brownfields

database: epadata.epa.state.il.us/land/brownfields.

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land (April 7, 2010). BOL database:

epadata .epa. state.il.us/land/inventory/.

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land (April 7, 2010). Site remediation program

database: epadata.epa.state.il.us/land/srp/.

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land (July 2007). State underground injection

control inventory, 1984-July 2007.

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Water (2008). Illinois Integrated Water Quality

Report and Section 303(d) List. www.epa.state.il.us/water/water-quality/index.html.

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Water (2008). Illinois Integrated Water Quality

Report and Section 303(d) list: Appendix B-2. Stream Assessments. www.epa.state.il.us/

water/tmdl/303-appendix/2008/appendix-b2-streams.pdf.

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (April 5, 2010). Leaking underground storage tank

(LUST) database: http://epadata.epa.state.il.us/land/ust/.

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency Response (January 30, 2006).

Incident database, 1972-January 2006.

Masters, J.M., Ipe, V.C., Smith, L.R., and Falter, M. (1999). Directory of Illinois Mineral Producers

and Maps of Extraction Sites, 1997. Illinois State Geological Survey, Illinois Minerals 117.

National Response Center (1990-2010). Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS)

database: www.nrc.uscg.mil/foia.html.
14

Office of the State Fire Marshal (April 7, 2010). Underground storage tank (UST) database:

www.state.il.us/osfm.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service web soil survey (January

8, 2010). websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/applWebSoiISurvey.aspx.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1982-1989). Emergency response notification system

(ERNS) database: www.rtknet.org/db/erns/.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (April 7, 2010). Illinois Brownfields pilot sites database:

www.epa.gov/swerosps/bf/plocat.htm#region5.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (April 7, 2010). Resource conservation and recovery

information system (RCRAinfo) database, CORRACTS and non-CORRACTS databases:

www.epa.gov/enviro/html/rcris/rcris_queryjava.html.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (April 6, 2010). Comprehensive Environmental Response,

Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLlS) database: cfpub.epa.govl

supercpad/cursites/srchsites.cfm.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1987-2008). Toxics release inventory: www.epa.gov/

enviro/html/tris/tris_query.html.

U.S. Geological Survey and Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (2010). Source Water

Assessment Program for Illinois: www.epa.state.il.us/water/groundwaterlsource-waterassessment/index.html.

GIS Data

Berg, R.C., and Kempton, J. P. (1988). Stack-unit mapping of geologic materials in Illinois to a

depth of 15 meters. Illinois State Geological Survey Circular 542. GIS data produced from

publication plates (1995, revised 1998).

Geiger, J.W. (2006). Summary of former manufactured gas plants of Illinois (draft). Illinois State

Geological Survey.

Illinois Department of Natural Resources (1997). Landfill sites of Illinois.

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Water. Illinois Water Quality Mapping Tool:

maps.epa.state.i1.us/website/wqinfol.

Illinois State Geological Survey. ILOIL Interactive Mapping System: runoff.isgs.uiuc.edu/websitel

iloil/viewer.htm.

Illinois State Geological Survey, Environmental Site Assessments section (2008). Summary of

CERCLIS sites in Illinois (draft). Illinois State Geological Survey.

Illinois State Geological Survey, Environmental Site Assessments section (2008). Summary of

landfill sites in Illinois (draft). Illinois State Geological Survey.
15

Illinois State Geological Survey, Environmental Site Assessments section (2008). Summary of

LUST sites in Illinois (draft). Illinois State Geological Survey.

Killey, M.M., Hines, J.K., and DuMontelle, P.O. (1985). Landslide inventory of Illinois. Illinois State

Geological Survey Circular 534. GIS data produced from Plate 1 (1995).

Kolata, D.R. (2005). Bedrock geology of Illinois. Illinois State Geological Survey Illinois Map 14.

Piskin, K. (1975). Glacial drift in Illinois: Thickness and character. Illinois State Geological Survey

Circular 490. GIS data produced from Plate 1 (1994, revised 1998).

U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Pipeline Safety (2010). Pipeline Integrity

Management Mapping Application: www.npms.phmsa.dot.gov.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, and Illinois Natural History

Survey (1996). Illinois wetlands inventory.

U.S. Geological Survey and Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (2010). Source Water

Assessment Program (SWAP) ArclMS Mapping Tool: www.epa.state.il.us/water/

groundwater/source-water-assessmentlindex.html.

Bailey and Son (1903). Plat maps. Bureau County.

Rockford Map Publishers (1938,1948,1952,1965,1971,1975,1980,1988,1995, 2005). Plat

maps. Bureau County.

U.S. Geological Survey (2008). Earthquake Hazards Program, Preliminary National Seismic

Hazard Maps, Central and Eastern US. Peak Acceleration (% g) with 2% Probability of

Exceedance in 50 Years: http://gldims.cr.usgs.gov/.

U.S. Geological Survey (1983). Topographic map, 1:24,000 (7.5-minute) series: Wyanet

Quadrangle.

Warner and Beers (1875). Plat maps. Bureau County.

Weibel, C.P. and Panno, S.V. (1997). Karst terrains and carbonate rocks of Illinois [map], in Karst

regions of Illinois. Illinois State Geological Survey Open File Series 1997-2.

Aerial Photographs

2005 ISGS photomosaic

1998 ISGS photomosaic

1988 Markhurd IL 557 Line 36

1970 USDA RR-2LL-60 and 99

1964 USDA RR-2EE-196

1958 USDA RR-1V-17
16

1951 USDA RR-3H-25, 26,141, and 142

1941 USDA RR-2B-137 and 138

Ogden, Jan (March 31, 2010). Written correspondence. Freedom of Information Officer, Illinois

Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land, Springfield, Illinois.
APPENDIX

IDOT:

City:

County:

Location Coordinates:

IDOT District Contact:

Name:

Phone:

17

ISGS PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST

NA

Wyanet

Bureau

T'1'6i'["R8E, Sections 19 and 20

Connie Lindenmier

(815) 434-8434

ISGS: 2191

ISGS Lead: D. Adomaitis

Task Status* Date By

Orialnal Material Cooied MF 4/1/10 DJA

lOOT Project Location Database - (All other projects/lOOT sites in the vicinity of the project)

• Other Preliminary Environmental Site Assessments NF 4/5/10 DJA

• Preliminary Site InvestigationslPhase II Reports NF 4/5/10 DJA

• Maintenance Facilities NF 4/5/10 DJA

• Permit-Access Agreements NF 4/5/10 DJA

• Draft Highway Authority Agreements/Highway Authority Agreements NF 4/5/10 DJA

• Miscellaneous Sites NF 4/5/10 DJA

Local Collections

• County NF 4/5/10 DJA

• City NF 4/5/10 DJA

Geologic Information

• ISGS Stack-Unit Map (GIS) MF 4/5/10 DJA

• ISGS Glacial Drift in Illinois (GIS) MF 4/5/10 DJA

·

ISGS Bedrock Geology of Illinois (GIS) MF 4/5/10 DJA

·

USDA NRCS Soil Survey Maps MF 4/5/10 DJA

• USDA NRCS Hydric Soils MF 4/5/10 DJA

·

USDA NRCS Prime Farmland Soils MF 4/5/10 DJA

Hydrogeologic Information (non-CE projects only)

• IEPA Restricted Status List NA 4/5/10 DJA

• USGS-IEPA SWAP-IL Public Water Supplies NA 4/5/10 DJA

• ISGS Wells (GIS) NA 4/5/10 DJA

·

ISWS Public Water Supply Surface Water Intakes in illinois (GIS) NA 4/5/10 DJA

·

Berg Potential for Aquifer Contamination Map NA 4/5/10 DJA

• Keefer Potential for Aquifer Recharge Map NA 4/5/10 DJA

• Sole Source Aquifer Protection Program NA 4/5/10 DJA

Hydrogeologic Information (all projects)

• USGS-I EPA SWAP Wellhead Protection NF 4/6/10 DJA

• USGS-I EPA SWAP Fact Sheets /IEPA Well Site Survey Reports NF 4/6/10 DJA

Historical Records

·

Aerial Photographs MF 4/7/10 DJA

• USGS Topographic Maps MF 4/7/10 DJA

• Plat Maps MF 4/7/10 DJA

• Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps: Chadwyck-Healey Inc. NF 3/28/10 DJA

• Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps: University Publications of America NF 3/28/10 DJA

• Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps: Rascher Publishing Company NF 3/28/10 DJA

• City Directories NF 3/28/10 DJA

• Industrial Directories (optional) NA 3/28/10 DJA

• IEPA-ISGS Summary of Former Manufactured Gas Plant Sites (GIS) NF 4/1/10 DJA

• ISGS Draft CERCUS Site Coverage (GIS) NF 4/1/10 DJA

• ISGS Draft LUST Site Coverage (GIS) NF 4/1/10 DJA

• ISGS Draft Landfill Site Coverage (GIS) NF 4/1/10 DJA
18

Task Status* Date By

Federal Records

• CERCLIS (NPL, Active, Archived) NF 4/7/10 DJA

·

Mercury Site Lists NF 4/7/10 DJA

• RCRA CORRACTS NF 4/7/10 DJA

• RCRA Non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities NF 4/7/10 DJA

• RCRA (Other) NF 4/7/10 DJA

• ERNS NF 4/7/10 DJA

• Brownfields Pilot Sites NF 4/7/10 DJA

• Toxics Release Inventory NF 4/7/10 DJA

USEPA Information Request

• Sent No 3/28/10 DJA

• Received

State Records

• LUST NF 4/7/10 DJA

• UST NF 4/7/10 DJA

• Landfills (GIS) NF 4/7/10 DJA

• Activity and Use Limitations (AULs) NF 4/7/10 DJA

• Brownfields NF 4/7/10 DJA

• IEPA Bureau of Land Inventory NF 4/7/10 DJA

• IEPA Site Remediation Program NF 4/7/10 DJA

• lEMA Incidents NF 4/7/10 DJA

• State Underground Injection Control Inventory NF 4/7/10 DJA

• IEPA Illinois Water Quality Reports MF 4/7/10 DJA

IEPA BOL Information Request

• Sent Yes 3/30/10 DJA

• Received Yes 3/31/10

OSFM Information Request

• Sent No 3/28/10 DJA

• Received

Local Records

• Fire Department Records (optional) NA 4/2/10 DJA

Mining Maps and Publications

• ISGS Quadrangle/County On-Line Coal Maps and Directories NF 4/7/10 DJA

• ISGS Non-Coal Underground Mines NF 4/7/10 DJA

• Lead Mining NF 4/7/10 DJA

Oil and Gas Information

• ISGS Oil and Gas Fields/Oil Wells (ILOIL GIS) NF 4/6/10 DJA

• USDOT OPS Pipeline Integrity Management Mapping Application NF 4/6/10 DJA

Natural Hazards

• USGS Seismic Risk Map NF 4/7/10 DJA

• FEMA FIRM Maps MF 4/7/10 DJA

• ISGS Landslide Inventory (GIS) NF 4/7/10 DJA

• Weibel Karst Terrains and Carbonate Rocks of Illinois Maps NF 4/7/10 DJA

• USFWS, IDNR, and INHS Illinois Wetlands Inventory (GIS) MF 4/7/10 DJA

* MF = Material found within search radius; NF = Nothing found within search radius; NA = Not applicable

Date of Records Review Completion: April 7, 2010
19

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

1. Project location map, ISGS #2191.

2. Site location map.
ATTACHMENT 1: Project location map

ISGS #2191 '" '---"

o 0.50.25

1

I

•• Miles Kilometers

1
ATTACHMENT 2: Site location map

ISGS #2191

(Site boundary is approximate and should

not be used as actual parcel boundary)

o 75 150

Attachments Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Attachment 3 

Eola Main Line Improvements Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum 

HDR Engineering, Inc. 8404 Indian Hills Drive 

Omaha, Nebraska 68114-4908 

Phone (402) 399-1000 

Fax (402) 399-1111 

www.hdrinc.com 

Page 1 of 14 

Technical Memo

Eola Main Line Improvements 

Cultural Resources 

PROJECT DESCRIPTION 

In September 2009 the Iowa and Illinois departments of transportation (Iowa DOT and Illinois 

DOT) developed a Tier 1 Service Level Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Intercity 

Passenger Rail project between Chicago, Illinois, and Iowa City, Iowa. This memo provides 

supplemental information to that EA documenting potential historic properties in and around the 

Eola Yard that could be adversely affected by the proposed Project. The EA and supplemental 

Information will be submitted as part of the Iowa and Illinois DOTs’ Office of Rail 

Transportation application for High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) Program grant funds 

from the FRA FY2010 DOT Appropriations Act. 

The purpose of this technical memo is to assist the Iowa and Illinois DOTs in preparing 

supplemental information on possible cultural impacts to the Eola Yard resulting from the 

proposed Project. Since the current NEPA analysis is at the service level, specific Project 

impacts are not known. 

Eola Yard Cultural Resources Project Area - No federal agency has defined an Area of 

Potential Effects (APE) as yet. For the purposes of this memo, the project area includes railroad 

right of way (ROW) from about 500 feet west of the Farnsworth Avenue overpass on the west 

end of the yard to roughly 500 feet west of the EJ&E Railroad overpass (Figure 1). 

The entirety of the archaeological resources review is within the existing Eola Yard, an active 

rail yard with dozens of trains passing through each day. Limits for the architectural structures 

review coincide with the incremental noise and vibration contours (Figure 2). Being an active 

yard, the soils in the area are mapped by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service 

Web Soil Survey as earthy fill (USDA 2010). 
Cultural Resources Technical Memo 

HDR Engineering, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 600 

Minneapolis, MN 55416 

Phone (763) 591-5400 

Fax (763) 591-5413 

www.hdrinc.com 

Page 2 of 14 

Figure 1: Existing Eola Rail Yard 
Cultural Resources Technical Memo 

HDR Engineering, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 600 

Minneapolis, MN 55416 

Phone (763) 591-5400 

Fax (763) 591-5413 

www.hdrinc.com 

Page 3 of 14 

Figure 2: Vibration and Noise Contours and Impacts 

 
Cultural Resources Technical Memo 

HDR Engineering, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 600 

Minneapolis, MN 55416 

Phone (763) 591-5400 

Fax (763) 591-5413 

www.hdrinc.com 

Page 4 of 14 

BACKGROUND RESEARCH 

The following resources were reviewed in order to discover the likelihood of historic properties 

existing within the Eola Yard. 

• Historic aerial photographs from 1939 (Illinois Natural Resources Geospatial Data 

Clearinghouse 2010) 

• 1874 atlas (Historic Map Works. 2010a) 

• Government Land Office (GLO) plats (Illinois State Archives 2010) 

• SHPO/IAS surveys and data (Illinois Archaeological Survey 2010) 

• History of DuPage County, Illinois (Blanchard 1892) 

• Map of Naperville Township, DuPage County, 1904 (Shows Chicago, Burlington, and 

Quincy Railroad running through property still owned by E.G. Crane. No rail yard 

shown.) (Historic Map Works. 2010b) 

• Historic topographic maps (EDR 2010) 

• Naperville Township, DuPage County, Aurora Township; Kane County Assessors 

Offices online records 

Results from the reviews are discussed below. 

SHPO/IAS SURVEYS AND DATA 

On June 23, 2010, HDR requested a site file search from the Illinois Archaeological Survey 

(IAS) and the Illinois State Museum Society for information on previously recorded 

archaeological sites within a 1-mile radius of the yard. Information was received June 30, 2010. 

The online database for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP 2010) was checked for 

listed properties within or near the yard. There are no listed properties within the area, and the 

nearest listed property is more than a mile away at the intersection of Spring and Broadway 

streets in Aurora. A search for locally listed properties has not been conducted. Below are 

summaries of the information received from the Illinois State Museum Society for archaeological 

properties near the project area. 

Summary of Kane County 

There have been no previous surveys and no recorded archaeological sites within the Eola Yard. 

Most of the surveys conducted within 1 mile of the yard were related to residential and 

commercial development (Table 1). Of the 12 sites recorded within 1 mile of the project, six are 

low density lithic scatters or isolated finds associated with undetermined prehistoric cultural 

affiliation (Table 2). The remaining six sites are historic, and none predate the Early Industrial 

period (1871-1900). The compliance status of all sites is “Not Eligible for the National Register 

of Historic Places.” 
Cultural Resources Technical Memo 

HDR Engineering, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 600 

Minneapolis, MN 55416 

Phone (763) 591-5400 

Fax (763) 591-5413 

www.hdrinc.com 

Page 5 of 14 

Ta b le 1: Re c o rd e d Histo ric Pro p e rtie s within 1 Mile o f Eo la Ya rd 

Site Number Associated 

Survey Doc # Context National Register Eligibility Status 

11-K-724 12351 Histo ric – p o st 1871 No t e lig ib le 

11-K-725 12351 Histo ric – p o st 1871 No t e lig ib le 

11-K-726 12351 Histo ric – p o st 1871 No t e lig ib le 

11-K-727 12351 Pre histo ric unkno wn No t e lig ib le 

11-K-912 14364 Pre histo ric unkno wn No t e lig ib le 

11-K-913 14364 Pre histo ric unkno wn No t e lig ib le 

11-K-914 14364 Histo ric – p o st 1871 No t e lig ib le 

11-K-915 14364 Pre histo ric unkno wn No t e lig ib le 

11-K-916 14364 Po st-Wa r No t e lig ib le 

11-K-917 14364 Pre histo ric unkno wn No t e lig ib le 

11-K-918 14364 Histo ric – p o st 1871 No t e lig ib le 

11-K-919 14364 Pre histo ric unkno wn No t e lig ib le 

Ta b le 2: Re c o rd e d Surve ys within 1 Mile o f Eo la Ya rd 

Surveys w/in 1 mi 

(Doc #) Preparer Year survey completed 

13214 n/ a n/ a 

13335 Mid we st Arc ha e o lo g ic a l Re se a rc h Se rvic e s, Inc . 2003 

12351 Arc ha e o lo g y a nd G e o m o rp ho lo g y Se rvic e s 2002 

14364 Arc ha e o lo g y a nd G e o m o rp ho lo g y Se rvic e s 2004 

3475 No rthe rn Ill Unive rsity 1990 

15308 No rthe rn Ill Unive rsity 2005 

178 Mid -Am e ric a n Re se a rc h C e nte r n/ a 

7940 Ill Tra nsp o rta tio n Arc ha e o lo g ic a l Re se a rc h Pro g ra m 1996 

Summary of DuPage County 

Within the DuPage County portion of the survey area, there have been no previous surveys and 

no recorded archaeological sites. Most of the surveys conducted within 1 mile of the project have 

been related to development (Table 3). Of the 16 sites recorded within 1 mile of the yard, seven 

are low density artifact scatters associated with undetermined prehistoric cultural affiliation, and 

two are isolated finds (Table 4). One is a multicomponent Late Archaic/historic site. The 

remaining six sites are from historic periods. The compliance status of nine sites is “Not Eligible 

for the National Register of Historic Places,” with the remaining sites’ status undetermined or 

not available at the time of report preparation. 
Cultural Resources Technical Memo 

HDR Engineering, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 600 

Minneapolis, MN 55416 

Phone (763) 591-5400 

Fax (763) 591-5413 

www.hdrinc.com 

Page 6 of 14 

Ta b le 3: Re c o rd e d Surve ys within 1 Mile o f Eo la Ya rd 

Surveys w/in 1 mi 

(Doc #) Preparer Ye a r Surve y 

Co m p le te d 

2488 The Be nha m G ro up , Inc 1988 

4020 n/ a n/ a 

4876 Unive rsity o f Ill. Re so urc e Inve stig a tio n Pro g ra m 1992 

6048 Arc ha e o lo g ic a l Re se a rc h Inc . 1994 

6138 Mid we st Arc ha e o lo g ic a l Re se a rc h Se rvic e s, Inc . 1994 

6387 No rthe rn Illino is Unive rsity 1995 

7294 Arc ha e o lo g ic a l Re se a rc h Inc . 1996 

7940 n/ a n/ a 

9434 Mid we st Arc ha e o lo g ic a l Re se a rc h Se rvic e s, Inc . 1999 

9620 The C .A.V.E. G ro up , Inc . 1999 

9953 The C .A.V.E. G ro up , Inc . 1999 

13036 Pub lic Se rvic e Arc ha e o lo g y Pro g ra m 2003 

14063 Arc ha e o lo g ic a l Re se a rc h Inc . 2003 

16099 Pub lic Se rvic e Arc ha e o lo g y Pro g ra m 2007 

18017 Ill Tra nsp o rta tio n Arc ha e o lo g ic a l Re se a rc h Pro g ra m 2009 

18213 Mid we st Arc ha e o lo g ic a l Re se a rc h Se rvic e s, Inc . 2008 

Ta b le 4: Re c o rd e d Histo ric Pro p e rtie s within 1 Mile o f Eo la Ya rd 

Site Number Associated 

Survey Doc # Context National RegisterEligibility Status 

11-Du-311 n/ a Pre histo ric unkno wn No t e lig ib le 

11-Du-111 n/ a Pre histo ric unkno wn n/ a 

11-Du-213 4876 Multic o m p o ne nt La te Arc ha ic / histo ric n/ a 

11-Du-214 4876 Pre histo ric unkno wn n/ a 

11-Du-312 n/ a Pre histo ric unkno wn No t e lig ib le 

11-Du-313 n/ a Histo ric -Mo d e rn No t e lig ib le 

11-Du-323 6138 Histo ric Euro Am e ric a n und e te rm ine d 

11-Du-338 6387 Histo ric – p o st 1871 No t e lig ib le 

11-Du-339 6387 Histo ric – p o st 1871 No t e lig ib le 

11-Du-340 6387 Histo ric – p o st 1901 No t e lig ib le 

11-Du-4 n/ a Pre histo ric wo o d la nd n/ a 

11-Du-440 9434 Pre histo ric unkno wn No t e lig ib le 

11-Du-441 9434 Pre histo ric unkno wn No t e lig ib le 

11-Du-472 13036 Histo ric – p o st 1841 No t e lig ib le 

11-Du-90030 n/ a Iso la te d find n/ a 

11-Du-90031 n/ a Iso la te d find n/ a 
Cultural Resources Technical Memo 

HDR Engineering, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 600 

Minneapolis, MN 55416 

Phone (763) 591-5400 

Fax (763) 591-5413 

www.hdrinc.com 

Page 7 of 14 

EOLA HISTORIC MAP REVIEW 

The main railroad line appears to be of historic age. The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad 

was originally the Aurora Branch Railroad that extended 13 miles from Aurora into Kane 

County, and to Turner Junction (now West Chicago) in 1852. The name changed in 1852 to the 

Chicago & Aurora Railroad, and then changed again in 1853 to Chicago, Burlington, and Quincy 

Railroad Co. The line was completed to Chicago by 1864, thereby creating a link west to the 

Mississippi River (Blanchard 1882). 

Government Land Office Maps 

(Illinois State Archives. 2010) 

DuPage County 1842. The land survey map of DuPage County indicates the Eola Yard area and 

its surroundings were composed of farmland and marsh. 

Kane County 1840. The land survey map of Kane County shows a road to Chicago about one 

mile south of the yard area, and a stream (Indian Creek) running north-south through and along 

the section lines between Sections 13 & 14. 

Other Atlases 

The DuPage County Atlas 1874, Naperville Township (Historic Map Works 2010a) shows the 

railroad traversing the yard area, but no yard. Property on either side of the railroad is shown as 

owned by Edgar G. Crane. The map also shows two structures very near the northern boundary 

of the area. These are a cheese factory and the Eola Post Office. 

DuPage County 1904, Naperville Township. (Historic Map Works. 2010b) This map depicts the 

Chicago Burlington Quincy RR running through property still owned by E.G. Crane. No rail 

yard is shown. 

Historic Topographic Maps 

The 1993 topographic map of Naperville (7.5 ft series, Scale: 1:24000) shows Eola Road 

continuing in a straight line crossing over the rail yard. The 1998 quad map of the same area 

shows the crossing is removed, and a new bypass constructed over the yard, east of the previous 

crossing. The Vaughn Road overpass is visible on the 1980 topographic map, but by 1993 it has 

been removed. The topographic maps from 1949 to 1993 indicate several structures existed 

within the yard, primarily in the central part near the southern tracks, which were probably used 

for off-loading and product storage. (EDR 2010) 

As no Sanborn fire insurance maps exist, details of the structures are not available. Today, this 

area is used as a lumberyard, and a standing brick structure holds the BNSF electrical 

department. 
Cultural Resources Technical Memo 

HDR Engineering, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 600 

Minneapolis, MN 55416 

Phone (763) 591-5400 

Fax (763) 591-5413 

www.hdrinc.com 

Page 8 of 14 

HISTORIC AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS 

Several structures appear on the 1938 aerial photograph that are no longer standing today 

(Illinois Natural Resources Geospatial Data Clearinghouse 2010). One is the bridge that carried 

Vaughn Road over the railroad yard and tracks. Other structures include the cheese factory 

buildings that were indicated on the 1874 atlas, and various structures associated with the rail 

yard (Historic Map Works. 2010a). The areas adjacent to the rail yard are primarily agricultural. 

FIELD VISIT 

On July 6, 2010, HDR representatives were escorted through the site by BNSF personnel to 

assess the area for potential archaeological properties and historic standing structures. The visit 

was limited to areas within the active rail yard where allowed by BNSF, and was conducted by 

personnel in vehicles with stops at key areas within the rail yard. Photographs were taken of 

items of interest, including culverts, bridges and other structures, and building foundations. The 

photographs serve to document overall rail yard conditions, and evidence of disturbance. 

SUMMARY OF RESEARCH 

Prehistoric Archaeological Properties

Although there are no properties or surveys previously recorded within the ROW, within 1 mile 

records show that there are several previous inventory studies and recorded properties (Illinois 

Archaeological Survey 2010). There may have been prehistoric sites within the rail yard at one 

time; however, it is highly likely that all traces have been removed by previous agricultural 

tilling associated with the Crane farm, and the later incremental development of the rail yard. 

HDR’s environmental assessment revealed that a train collision in the 1990s spilled fuel oil 

requiring soil removal from the yard as remediation (HDR 2010). It is very doubtful that any 

intact soils remain within the yard that could contain cultural remains from the precontact period. 

Historic Archaeological Properties 

Several structures appear on the 1938 aerial photograph, and on the historic topographic maps, 

that are no longer standing today. (Illinois Natural Resources Geospatial Data Clearinghouse 

2010, EDR 2010) One is a bridge that carried Eola Road over the railroad tracks. The piers for 

the bridge are still standing. Other potential archaeological remains may be associated with 

structures associated with railroad use, off-loading, and storage of materials among the southern 

tracks. Two concrete slabs and/or foundations from structures of unknown age are visible on 

either side of the new Eola Road overpass (Photos 1 & 2). 

Historic Standing Structures 

From the 1874 atlas, two structures stand out: a cheese factory and the Eola post office (Historic 

Map Works. 2010a). Records from the Naperville township assessor indicate that the post office 

was built in 1874. No information is available on the cheese factory. Neither of these structures 

is within the rail yard; both are adjacent to the yard, on the north side. 
Cultural Resources Technical Memo 

HDR Engineering, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 600 

Minneapolis, MN 55416 

Phone (763) 591-5400 

Fax (763) 591-5413 

www.hdrinc.com 

Page 9 of 14 

 

Photo 1: Concrete Slab Foundation 

Photo 2: Concrete Foundation 
Cultural Resources Technical Memo 

HDR Engineering, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 600 

Minneapolis, MN 55416 

Phone (763) 591-5400 

Fax (763) 591-5413 

www.hdrinc.com 

Page 10 of 14 

IMPACTS TO HISTORIC STRUCTURES 

The previous noise and vibration study (Completed in September 2009) identified 16 structures 

within or adjacent to the current rail yard that could be incrementally affected by noise or 

vibration if the proposed Project is built (Table 5). Most of these structures are elements of 

modern, recently built residential subdivisions and as such, do not meet the requirements of a 

historic property based on age (photo 3). There are an unknown number of residences that could 

be affected within one recently built structure on Stamford Court, and in two additional 

structures on Bromley Lane. 

Ta b le 5: Pro p e rtie s within the Eo la Ya rd 

Po te ntia lly Affe c te d b y No ise a nd / o r Vib ra tio n 

Address Description Year built 

DuPa g e Co unty 

1060-1080 Sta m fo rd C o urt C o nd o s 2002 

3100 Blo c k, Bro m le y La ne C o nd o s 2002 

1041 O a khill Dr., Auro ra Ho use 2001 

1047 O a khill Dr., Auro ra Ho use 2001 

1066 O a khill Dr., Auro ra 

2531 Sutto n La ne , Auro ra Ho use / c o nd o 1996 

2533 Sutto n La ne , Auro ra Ho use / c o nd o 1998 

2535 Sutto n La ne , Auro ra Ho use / C o nd o 1998 

1064 E 4th St., Eo la Ho use 2001 

6s381 4th St., Eo la Ho use 1900 

6s375 Eo la Rd ., Eo la Ho use 1924 

Ka ne Co unty 

1305 Rura l St., Auro ra Ho use n/ a 

1307 Rura l St., Auro ra Sing le sto ry Ho use 1948 

1313 Rura l St., Auro ra Sing le sto ry Ho use 1955 
Cultural Resources Technical Memo 

HDR Engineering, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 600 

Minneapolis, MN 55416 

Phone (763) 591-5400 

Fax (763) 591-5413 

www.hdrinc.com 

Page 11 of 14 

Photo 3. Example of modern house on Oakhill Drive 

Photo from Naperville Township Assessor’s office

Two structures that could be affected are potentially historic. These include 6S381 4th Street, and 

6S375 Old Eola Road, in the unincorporated village of Eola, in Naperville Township, DuPage 

County. These structures are of sufficient age to meet eligibility requirements of the NRHP 

(photos 4 & 5). Additional investigation into their historical significance may be warranted. 

On the western end of the yard there are three structures that may be affected by incremental 

noise impacts. These include structures located at 1305, 1307, and 1313 Rural Street, Aurora. 

The year-built information for the structure at 1305 Rural St. was not available. The two other 

structures are mid-twentieth century residences that may meet age requirements for the NRHP. 

Photographs of these structures are not available. Additional investigation on these properties 

may be warranted. 

CONCLUSION 

There are no previously recorded archaeological sites within the Eola Yard. The two foundations 

noted during field review are poured concrete and date to the early to mid twentieth century. 

While the original structures may have been important to the operation of the rail line, there is 

little chance that they could currently contain important archaeological information. The yard 

itself has been heavily altered throughout its existence, such that it is unlikely that there are any 
Cultural Resources Technical Memo 

HDR Engineering, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 600 

Minneapolis, MN 55416 

Phone (763) 591-5400 

Fax (763) 591-5413 

www.hdrinc.com 

Page 12 of 14 

current areas within the yard that would contain significant and undisturbed buried cultural 

materials. 

There are three structures on the west end of the yard that are within the noise impact contour 

that may fall outside the Eola Yard Improvement limits, but are close enough to warrant 

attention. The structures appear to date to the mid twentieth century, and may be old enough to 

warrant further inventory, assuming they actually fall within the yard improvement limits. Two 

structures within the incremental vibration contours within the unincorporated village of Eola 

have sufficient age to require additional inventory at the Tier 2 level. The field visit noted that 

there are additional vintage structures within the rail yard or adjacent to it. The scope of this 

assessment was to document those structures that would be incrementally affected by noise or 

vibration should the project be constructed, not those already within the existing contours. If 

construction will require removal or alteration of existing structures within the rail yard, 

additional inventory may be necessary. 

Photo 4: Eola Road 

Photo from Naperville Township Assessor’s office.
Cultural Resources Technical Memo 

HDR Engineering, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 600 

Minneapolis, MN 55416 

Phone (763) 591-5400 

Fax (763) 591-5413 

www.hdrinc.com 

Page 13 of 14 

 

Photo 5: 6351 4th Street 

Photo from Naperville Township Assessor’s office
Cultural Resources Technical Memo 

HDR Engineering, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 600 

Minneapolis, MN 55416 

Phone (763) 591-5400 

Fax (763) 591-5413 

www.hdrinc.com 

Page 14 of 14 

REFERENCES/SOURCES 

Aurora Township Assessor’s Office Website. Accessed July 2010 at 

http://auroratownshipassessor.com/Assessor/assessor.html 

Blanchard, Rufus. 1882. History of Du Page County. Chicago: O.L. Baskin & Co., Historical 

Publishers. Accessed from Illinois Digital Archives in July 2010 at 

http://www.idaillinois.org/u?/npl,1186 

Du Page County Assessor’s Office Website. Accessed July 2010 at 

http://www.co.dupage.il.us/soa/ 

Historic Map Works. 2010a. Naperville Township Map from the1874 Du Page County Atlas. 

Originally published byThompson Bros. and Burr, Chicago. Accessed in July 2010 at 

http://www.historicmapworks.com/Map/US/27736/Naperville+Township/ 

Historic Map Works. 2010b. Naperville Township Map from the 1904 Du Page County Atlas. 

Originally published by Middle-West Publishing Co., Chicago. Accessed in July 2010 at 

http://www.historicmapworks.com/Map/US/214213/Naperville+Township++Eola++Cop

enhagen/DuPage+County+1904/Illinois/ 

Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). Eola Yard Improvements Project Level EA. Report 

prepared for HDR Engineering, Inc., June 23, 2010. 

HDR Engineering, Inc. (HDR). 2010. Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment Chicago to 

Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service Eola Mainline Improvements. Report prepared 

for the Illinois and Iowa Departments of Transportation, July 2010. 

Illinois Archaeological Survey/Illinois State Museum Society. Project Area Sites and Surveys 

Record Search. June 2010. 

Illinois Natural Resources Geospatial Data Clearinghouse, University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign. Historic aerial photographs from 1938 (Dupage Co.) and 1939 (Kane Co.). 

Accessed in July 2010 at: http://www.isgs.uiuc.edu/nsdihome/ 

Illinois State Archives. 2010. Federal Township Plats of Illinois (1804-1891). Accessed in July 

2010 at http://landplats.ilsos.net/FTP_Illinois.html 

Kane County Assessors Office. Accessed July 2010 at http://www.co.kane.il.us/soa/ 

Naperville Township Website. Accessed July 2010 at 

http://www.napervilletownship.com/SD/Naperville/content/default.aspx 

National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Database searched in July 2010 at 

http://www.nps.gov/nr/ 

USDA. 2010. Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey Soil Survey. Accessed 

from: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx 
Attachments Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Attachment 4 

Wyanet Connection Archaeological Survey Short Report 





Attachments Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Attachment 5 

Eola Main Line Improvements Aquatic/Stream Impact Analysis 

Conceptual Mitigation Technical Memorandum 

	ABC

DEC	FC	C	DF	FF	E	

		CBF	BF

Chicago to Iowa Ci

Eola Main Line Imp

Analysis an

INTRODUCTION 

The purpose of this technical mem

resources and anticipated impacts

Main Line Improvements, located

Improvements are a component o

required to reestablish intercity pa

In 2009, Illinois Department of Tr

Transportation (Iowa DOT) prepa

EA) describing the potential envi

service between Chicago and Iow

Administration (FRA) as part of I

Rail Program grant application. Th

DOT and Iowa DOT are submitti

funding the intercity passenger ra

2010 Notice of Funding Availabi

Program. As part of the 2010 HSI

resubmit the 2009 EA with suppl

impacts to aquatic resources from

for those impacts. Detailed discus

Line Improvements is included in

EA. 

AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT

This technical memo describes th

limits of the Eola Main Line Impr

assessment of existing conditions

aquatic habitat quality through a d

condition. The assessment of exis

Improvements section of the Proj

conveyances (wetlands are discus

features within Eola yard convey l

the southern branch of Indian Cre

FFB	BF		 	DC

		

Technical 

 City Intercity Passenger Rail 

mprovements Aquatic/Stream

and Conceptual Mitigation Pla

emo is to characterize the affected environment fo

cts to these resources from the construction of the 

ted in Kane and Du Page County, Illinois. The Eo

t of the set of required infrastructure improvement

 passenger rail service between Chicago and Iowa

f Transportation (Illinois DOT) and Iowa Departm

epared a Service Level (Tier 1) Environmental Ass

vironmental impacts from reestablishing intercity

owa City. The 2009 EA was submitted to Federal R

 of Illinois DOT and Iowa DOT High-speed Intercit

The 2009 grant application was not successful. H

itting a new Grant Application to FRA for conside

 rail service between Chicago and Iowa City unde

ability for Service Development Programs under th

SIPR Grant Application, Illinois DOT and Iowa D

plemental information including this description o

om the Eola Main Line Improvements and concep

cussions of the purpose and need and description o

 in Chapters 1 and 2 of the Supplemental Informat

T

 the existing condition of the aquatic resources wit

provements section of the Project area (Figure 2)

ns for the aquatic resources includes background i

 a discussion of biological quality, water quality, a

xisting conditions within the survey limits of Eola

roject area will focus on several linear drainage fea

cussed and addressed in a separate memo). The lin

ey large volumes of water generated both on-site a

reek, a 2nd order perennial tributary of Fox River

DCF	AFEFC	

!	"#$#	

al Memo

il Service - 

am Impact 

Plan 

t for aquatic 

he proposed Eola 

 Eola Main Line 

ents that would be 

wa City (Figure 1). 

tment of 

 Assessment (2009 

ity passenger rail 

al Railroad 

rcity Passenger 

However, Illinois 

ideration of 

der the FRA’s 

r the HSIPR 

a DOT intend to 

n of possible 

eptual mitigation 

n of the Eola Main 

ation to the 2009 

 within the survey 

 2). The 

d information on 

, and geomorphic 

 Eola Main Line 

 features or 

 linear drainage 

e and off-site to 

ver. Field 
FFB	BF		 	DCF	AFEFC		 	ABC	

!	"#$#	 	 DEC	FC	C	DF	FF	E			

"	 		CBF	BF	

observations were made on July 6, 2010 at several representative channelized conveyances 

within the survey limits. A photo log of the site observations is included in Attachment A. 

Background Information 

The survey limits of the Eola Main Line Improvements section of the Project area resides within 

the within the Town of Aurora sub-basin HUC 12 (071200070107) of the Lower Fox River, 

HUC 8 (07120007). Aquatic resources within and surrounding the Eola Main Line 

Improvements section of the Project area include the perennial southern branch of Indian Creek 

to the south; several perennial to intermittent, channelized storm water conveyances within the 

survey limits; Eola Road Marsh Illinois Natural Area Inventory (INAI) site and Night Heron 

Marsh to the southeast; and several storm water detention ponds to the north (Figure 2). The 

linear conveyances within the survey limits of the Eola Main Line Improvements section of the 

Project area have a unique connection to both upstream and downstream resources. The 

drainages within Eola serve to connect the upstream Eola and Night Heron Marsh wetland 

complex and numerous storm water ponds to the southern branch of Indian Creek. The southern 

branch of Indian Creek flows west into the main branch of Indian Creek then into the Fox River, 

approximately two miles downstream from the location of the Eola main line improvements. 

Within the survey limits of the Eola Main Line Improvements section of the Project area there 

are approximately 16,700 linear feet of open channel, storm water conveyances, which includes 

approximately 2,200 linear feet of the southern branch of Indian Creek and two parallel wet 

bottom storm water conveyances that measure approximately 7,100 and 7,400 linear feet, 

respectively (Figure 2). 

The southern branch of Indian Creek can be characterized as an urbanized stream that has been 

heavily influenced by regional industrial-commercial development. Within the survey limits of 

the Eola Main Line Improvements section of the Project area, aquatic habitat resources are 

highly channelized and form a complex drainage network, which conveys both natural base flow 

and storm water generated from on- and offsite locations to downstream aquatic resources. These 

linear features have a mixture of perennial, intermittent, and ephemeral flow regimes and contain 

associated palustrine forested (PFO), palustrine scrub-shrub (PSS), and palustrine emergent 

(PEM) wetlands. A detailed discussion and maps of the wetlands identified within and adjacent 

to the survey limits are provided in the Wetlands Determination Report conducted by HDR 

Engineering, Inc. 

Biological Quality 

Biological quality of a stream is best assessed through detailed field sampling of various groups 

of aquatic species (i.e., fish, macro invertebrates, mussels, crayfish, amphibians, etc.) conducted 

according to Illinois approved methodologies. When detailed sampling data is unavailable, 

consultation with the IDNR Stream Rating System does provide some insight into regional 

biological quality. According to the Illinois Biological Stream Rating System (IDNR 2008) the 

south branch of Indian Creek is not listed as a Biologically Significant Stream (BSS) and it is not 

rated as A or B for diversity or integrity. The main or northern branch Indian Creek (adjacent to 

the western terminus of the Project Area) is rated as Class D (Poor – Limited Aquatic Resource) 

for integrity. This stream rating indicates that the main branch of Indian Creek is impaired and 

not functional according to its biological communities. 
	ABC	 FFB	BF		 	DCF	AFEFC		

DEC	FC	C	DF	FF	E			 	 !	"#$#	

		CBF	BF	 %	

A search of the Illinois Natural History (INHS) Fish Collection Database indicates there are no 

records of collections from Indian Creek; however, collection records from Fox River indicate 

over 60 species of fish have been collected from this large downstream tributary (Table 1) 

(http://ellipse.inhs.uiuc.edu:591/INHSCollections/fishsearch.html). Based on the proximity and 

downstream connection with Fox River, it is likely a small subset of these fish species is likely 

present within the southern branch of Indian Creek. Observations during the site visit conducted 

on July 6, 2010 confirmed the presence of fishes within the 2,220 linear feet of more natural 

stream habitat associated with the southern branch of Indian Creek. 

Table 1: Illinois Natural History Fish Collection Database 

# Genus species Common Name Stream 

	A 	ABCDEFB

BACA	 BE	ABCDEFB

D	EFBECBBB DBABC	DEFB

ADECEAABEA	 BEBEBDEFB

ADEFDB 	 	BDEFB

!ACECEEEB "AB	BDEFB

#ECCAF $EBC	 DEFB

%	AABEBCAB EEBDEFB

&DB		AD	EDCA ' E(ABDEFB

)DBADE EE DEFB

EEEADFAB *++CACDEFB

EAAB ,BBBDEFB

CECEAA	 ECBDEFB

CECEA	 -ECB.DEFB

CECEAB /EA0CBDEFB

!CECEAEBA	 CBCCBDEFB

#BF	BECAC  BE EDEFB

%DBC	BAB 1EABAE2	BDEFB

&CA	DBCAC AB(ADEFB

)CEA	 'E	A	((EDEFB

CEDB		 2E	A	((EDEFB

AFC	 EEBCBDEFB

DEAB		 *BB	(ADEFB

DEAB		E *BB	(AF	 BBCDEFB

DEAB		AE *BB	(AF	B2DEFB

!DEE 3	 BBC	(ADEFB

#DE	E "E	ADEFB

%DEF 40C	(ADEFB

&DEAE 	B2DEFB

)EDCFE	E 'E	ADEFB

EDCFE	E A	EF 'E	AA0CCDEFB

EDCA	EF 52BE	ADEFBFFB	BF		 	DCF	AFEFC		 	ABC	

!	"#$#	 	 DEC	FC	C	DF	FF	E			

&	 		CBF	BF	

# Genus species Common Name Stream 

EEBED "ABDEFB

EEBDDB BEDEFB

EECEAAB 'BBCAEBDEFB

!EECEAABAC BBCAEB.DEFB

#EECEAC *ECBBCAEBDEFB

%EECEAAE	DFEC 'AEABCBCAEBDEFB

&EECEA!A	BBB *BBBCAEB.DEFB

)"EECCAC 4E0ABCA	DEFB

"ECEBE	A *ECBABDEFB

"ECEDACBEF 6BCABDEFB

"ECEDEED 2B0BABDEFB

"ECEDFEB ' EABDEFB

"ECED	FBF 'CABDEFB

!"EC#	A! 'EBDEFB

#"ECB 7C EBCEDEFB

%$DEDEEF	A 3	2EBEDEFB

&%A#	A!B BEBADEFB

)%BAADEF 5E2 BADEFB

%BAA	ACA CBCBDEFB

%BADEEDA	A 'BCBABCCBDEFB

%BAEA	 '	BE	AEDEFB

%DA	BECAC 	EBEDEFB

%DA	DE	A DABCEDEFB

!%DA	!	A 	ABCEDEFB

#%EEABB	A "AB BDEFB

%%EEBEA	AC  BDEFB

&%	EFCE	!A DABC(ADEFB

!)&ABF!C "B0BDEFB

!&EC	ACEA	AC BBA	DEFB

'DACACCACBFABFBFABFDE(AFAC)CECEA	*)&'*+!FE

) EECEAABAC*)&'*+ABFACFE) EECEA!A	BBB*)&*

&E,		BE"ACA	CEE		CEBACAA+

CCD,--		DBF,./0-"&E		CEB-#AC	+C!FEB1	2+3404
	ABC	 FFB	BF		 	DCF	AFEFC		

DEC	FC	C	DF	FF	E			 	 !	"#$#	

		CBF	BF	 '	

Water Quality 

Water Quality standards in Illinois are determined by the Watershed Management Section 

(WMS) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA). In addition to setting state 

limits on water quality, IEPA administers the state 401 certification program. A typical 401 

project certification process includes: 1) a detailed antidegradation review according to state 

standards, 2) a public notice, 3) posting of an antidegradation fact sheet, 4) IEPA review of the 

comments received, 5) IEPA decision to hold a public hearing, and 6) preparation of comment 

responses prior to the issuance of any certification. Typical 401 project level certification may 

take up to two or more years for IEPA to fully process. 

Rivers and streams are rated based on the degree of support (attainment) of a designated use. 

Ratings are determined by an analysis of various types of information, including biological, 

physicochemical, physical habitat, and toxicity data. When sufficient data are available, each 

applicable designated use in each segment is assessed as Fully Supporting (good), Not 

Supporting (fair), or Not Supporting (poor). Waters in which at least one applicable use is not 

fully supported are considered “impaired.” Water Quality of streams within Illinois can be 

assessed by consulting the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) Integrated Water 

Quality Report and Section 303(d) list of Impaired Waters (IEPA 2010). 

According to the IEPA 303(d) list prepared in 2010, Indian Creek was not assessed; however the 

Fox River (HUC 072100701), in which Indian Creek discharges into, was assessed for use 

attainment in 2010 (Table 2) and was not supporting aquatic life (582), fish consumption (583), 

public and food processing water supplies (584), and primary contact (585). The identified 

causes include the following aldrin (79), alteration in stream-side or littoral vegetative covers 

(84), chloride (138), hexachlorobenzene (246), mercury (274), methoxychlor (277), other flow 

regime alterations (319), dissolved oxygen (322), polychlorinated biphenyls (348), 

sedimentation/siltation (371), fecal coliform (400), total suspended solids (403), pH (443), total 

phosphorus (462), and aquatic algae (479). Identified sources of the non attainment causes 

include the following atmospheric deposition – toxics (10), combined sewer overflows (23), 

contaminated sediments (28), impacts from hydrostructure flow regulation/modification (58), 

municipal point discharges (85), streambank modification/destabilization (125), source unknown 

(140), dam or impoundment (142), agriculture (156), and urban runoff/storm sewers (177) 

Table 2: 2010 IEPA 303(d) List - Specific Assessment Information for the Fox River 

Name Assessment

Unit ID 

10-Digit

HUC 

IEPA

Basin Cat. Size(miles) Use Attainment* 

DEF8-59:7;))#)))#)#8&1%<1%<1%<

=%!<=&)

DEF8-59:7;)&)#)))#)%81%<1%<1%<

=%!<=&)

DEF8-59:7;%)#)))#))8%1%<1%<1%<

1%<=%!<=&)

DEF8-59:7;%)#)))#)8#1%<1%<=%<

=%!<=&)

.=>EBBC?D>(	0	 E2?1>E	 E2?%>0E?%

>(AE	 E@%>A	(B?%!>BEC0E?&)>BABA	0FFB	BF		 	DCF	AFEFC		 	ABC	

!	"#$#	 	 DEC	FC	C	DF	FF	E			

(	 		CBF	BF	

Geomorphic Condition 

As described in the introduction the aquatic resources within the survey limits have been subject 

to significant disturbance and alteration from their original condition. Historical mapping of the 

region indicates modifications to the presettlement landscape occurred during the early to mid 

19th century. Since this time, the aquatic features within the yard have regained some natural 

features such as meanders, riffles and pools; however, ongoing “improvements” and routine 

maintenance activities continue to degrade the existing aquatic habitat. Assessment of the 

existing geomorphic condition was performed for the aquatic resources within the survey limits 

of the Project area through observation of the channel conditions and hydrological conditions. In 

addition, the IEPA Qualitative Stream Habitat Assessment Procedure (SHAP) was also 

performed. 

Channel and Hydrological Condition 

The wetted width of the channelized conveyances measured approximately 5 to 10 feet wide 

within the survey area of the Project Area, and maintained a depth of flow of approximately 1 to 

2 feet. Substrate within the channel was composed of course sands, gravel, and cobble, with a 

fair amount of fine grained sand and silt deposition as well. As mentioned above the stream 

channel has been straightened and is generally confined by railroad tracks. Some portions 

contain a small riparian bench approximately 5-10 feet wide adjacent to the channel. The banks 

slopes were approximately 2:1 (H:V) along most of the channel and were mostly vegetated with 

a mixture of emergent, shrub-scrub, and woody riparian vegetation. Outside of the riparian bench 

railroad ballast composed the remainder of the riparian area. The stream is constricted by various 

culverts within the survey limits, which connect the various linear conveyances to Indian Creek. 

Indian Creek becomes much more natural (i.e., more meandering with some riffle-pool structure) 

downstream and outside the survey limits.

Qualitative Stream Habitat Assessment Procedure (SHAP) 

The IEPA’s Qualitative Stream Habitat Assessment Procedure (SHAP) (IEPA 1994) was used to 

provide a standard assessment of the habitat within the linear aquatic resources on July 6, 2010. 

These linear conveyances have been channelized and disturbed; however, the lower 2,200 of 

stream within the survey limits does maintain natural channel characteristics including riffle-pool 

sequencing, undercut banks, while also maintain a small riparian bench around the channel. 

Overall the stream habitat is generally poor; however, it is suitable enough to support a limited 

community of aquatic organisms. Generally the function of this stream is to convey storm water 

from offsite (upstream) and onsite locations downstream to the southern branch of Indian Creek. 

Attachment B includes a completed SHAP form for the evaluated aquatic resources. 
	ABC	 FFB	BF		 	DCF	AFEFC		

DEC	FC	C	DF	FF	E			 	 !	"#$#	

		CBF	BF	 )	

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES 

The construction of the Eola main line improvements would impact approximately 4,920 linear 

feet of open channel storm water conveyances. In general the open channel would be replaced 

with an enclosed conduit and a new rail line constructed immediately adjacent to the enclosed 

conduit. Analysis of these impacts includes a discussion on the direct effects from the proposed 

action as well as the potential indirect effects. 

Direct Effects 

Construction of the proposed connection would relocated 4,920 linear feet of open storm water 

channel to an enclosed conduit. This direct effect would result in alternation to the current 

hydrology and would result in loss of open channel habitat. This direct effect would alter the 

current channel and would result in the permanent loss of this channelized stream habitat for 

numerous aquatic and terrestrial organisms, including fish, amphibians, invertebrates, and 

mammals. During construction, the open channel tributaries of the south branch of Indian Creek 

would be affected physically, chemically, and biologically. The biological functions of these 

systems would be affected by the loss of habitat, refugia, food production, reproduction, and 

dispersal. The chemical integrity of south branch tributaries can be defined as the natural 

composition and properties of various substances within the aquatic system. Impacts on the 

chemical functions would include alteration of nutrient cycling, particulate retention, organic 

carbon export, removal and sequestration of elements and compounds, and diminished water 

quality. The physical functions can be characterized as the hydrological attributes of a particular 

stream. Impacts on the physical functions would include alteration of the natural flow regime, 

flood attenuation ability, storm water reduction, groundwater exchange, and maintenance of 

natural thermal regimes. 

Indirect Effects 

Indirect effects would include impacts both upstream and downstream of the channel relocation. 

Indirect effects upstream of the Eola main line improvements of the Project area would include 

impacts on aquatic organism movement and disruption of the current hydrological regime. 

Downstream impacts on biota and habitat may also result from construction the improvements. 

During construction, changes in the hydrological flow may have indirect effects on downstream 

habitat. Furthermore, after construction, the new encased channel and its relation to downstream 

flows would require time to adjust. During the channel adjustment period, downstream habitat 

areas may indirectly change through scour and/or accretion; however, these impacts are likely to 

be short term and localized to areas immediately downstream of this section of the Project area. 

POTENTIAL MITIGATION MEASURES 

As stated above, approximately 4,920 linear feet of stream and storm water conveyances and 

their associated fringe wetlands (discussed in separate wetlands determination report) could be 

impacted by the proposed action. In order to offset the loss of aquatic habitat (stream and storm 

water conveyances and wetlands), mitigation for these aquatic resources will be required. 

In March of 2010, the USACE produced a regulatory guidance document that provides detailed 

guidance for stream mitigation in Illinois (USACE, 2010). This guidance document was 
FFB	BF		 	DCF	AFEFC		 	ABC	

!	"#$#	 	 DEC	FC	C	DF	FF	E			

*	 		CBF	BF	

designed in order to facilitate Clean Water Act Section 404 permit applications, and provide a 

standard way to assess adverse impacts and to determine the amount of mitigation required. 

Based on this guidance document, mitigation for the potential stream impacts to upper 

headwaters of the southern branch of Indian Creek could be accomplished through a combination 

of on- and off-site restoration alternatives. Preliminary analysis of mitigation alternatives and 

onsite observations indicated available onsite mitigation was limited due to numerous 

anthropogenic constraints within the railway yard. Ecologically successful mitigation would be 

very difficult to achieve onsite; however, numerous onsite Best Management Practices (BMPs) 

could be included as part of the mitigation. On-site mitigation is limited to and could include the 

implementation of numerous Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would minimize potential 

future impacts to aquatic resources. Furthermore, by implementing additional BMPs such as the 

use of interpretive signage, ecological training for rail employees and exotic species management 

potential future impacts may be avoided. 

In order to fully compensate for the functions and values, offsite mitigation appears to be a much 

more viable alternative for the impacts. Off-site mitigation could include: 

1. Aquatic habitat restoration and enhancement through the management of exotic species 

within Eola Road Marsh and Night Heron Marsh 

2. Restore stream and wetland habitat within Night Heron Marsh to south of Liberty Street 

3. Restore and enhance aquatic habitat features downstream within Indian Creek 

4. Purchase wetland and stream mitigation credits from an approved mitigation bank within 

the service area. 

Aquatic habitat within Eola Road Marsh and Night Heron Marsh can be enhanced by instituting 

an aggressive exotic species management plan. Removing exotics (i.e., buckthorn, reed canary 

grass, Phragmites etc.) and planting wetland herbaceous, shrubs and tree species would enhance 

these natural areas and improve overall aquatic habitat. Additional off-site mitigation in the form 

of habitat enhancement and/or creation could be accomplished through a partnership with the 

DuPage County Forest Preserve District (DCFPD) to restore wetlands and stream features within 

the Night Heron Marsh parcel to the south across Liberty Street. In recent years, the Forest 

Preserve acquired a parcel south of the road, which remains relatively undeveloped. Detailed offsite surveys to identify restoration options will be conducted during the Tier 2 project level 

NEPA environmental assessment process. 

 Approximately 6,500 linear feet of aquatic habitat along Indian Creek (Figure 3) could be 

enhanced through a combination of exotic species removal, wetland plantings, bank stabilization, 

and/or installation of the appropriate in-stream treatments such as: cross veins, j-hooks, porous 

weirs, newberry riffles, or root wads (Attachment C). Exact locations for the downstream 

mitigation measures have not been selected at this point of the project; however, detailed surveys 

to identify specific mitigation sites will be conducted during the Tier 2 project level NEPA 

environmental assessment process. These structures will be strategically located throughout 

Indian Creek to optimize their effect on scour and deposition along the creek. Installation of 

channel treatments will enhance stream substrate and aid in the development of riffle–pool 

sequencing to restore a more natural width to depth ratio. 

Additional off-site mitigation for wetlands and stream impacted by the Eola Main Line 

Improvements could be accomplished through the purchase of stream/wetland mitigation credits 
	ABC	 FFB	BF		 	DCF	AFEFC		

DEC	FC	C	DF	FF	E			 	 !	"#$#	

		CBF	BF	 +	

from an approved mitigation bank(s) located within the service area. Preliminary analysis 

indicates numerous permitted mitigation banks within northern Illinois include: 

1. Ferson Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank, USACOE Permit 199600027 

2. Otter Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank, USACOE Permit 199300675 

3. Butterfield Road Wetland Mitigation Bank, USACOE Permit 19980192 

4. Cedar Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank, USACOE Permit 200500804 

5. Andalusia Slough Wetland Mitigation Bank, USACOE Permit CEMVR-OD-P-2005-205 

6. Jelkes Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank, USACOE Permit 200300216 

7. Kilbuck Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank, USACOE Permit CEMVR-RD 342590 

8. Mink Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank, USACOE Permit 200200409 

9. Red Wing Slough Wetland Mitigation Bank, USACOE Permit 200300490 

By employing the appropriate combination of on- and off-site mitigation measures detailed 

above, impacts to the aquatic resource features within the Eola yard can be mitigated to minimize 

impacts. 

Should FRA approve Illinois DOT’s HSIPR grant application, preliminary engineering including 

detailed evaluation of possible alternatives to avoid or minimize aquatic impacts will be 

evaluated. In addition, detailed, site-specific mitigation plans to compensate for unavoidable 

impacts will be developed during the Tier 2 project level environmental assessment and Section 

404 permit evaluation. 

FUTURE PHASES OF THE PROJECT 

If the FRA approves the Illinois DOT FY2010 HSIPR Grant Application, Service Development 

Plan and Tier I EA, the next step in the development process will be to conduct a detailed Project 

Level NEPA review of the various project elements. During the Project Level NEPA review 

process numerous environmental surveys will be conducted at a more defined scale. The Project 

Level NEPA review will also include the full range of alternatives evaluation, impact assessment 

and mitigation development, including permit applications. It is also important to note that the 

detailed engineering and alternative analysis will be concurrent with the Project Level NEPA 

review. Illinois DOT will coordinate the future Project Level NEPA reviews with all of the 

appropriate federal and state agencies including the Illinois Department of Natural Resources 

(IDNR) and will work with these agencies to identify the best alternatives to avoid and minimize 

impacts to aquatic resource features. 
FFB	BF		 	DCF	AFEFC		 	ABC	

!	"#$#	 	 DEC	FC	C	DF	FF	E			

$#	 		CBF	BF	

REFERENCES 

HDR. Wetland Report for High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) - Eola Yard 

Improvements. July 2010. 

Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board. 

Updated November 1, 2009. On-line. 

http://dnr.state.il.us/conservation/naturalheritage/pdfs/et_list_by_co_aug2009.pdf 

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. DWPC Field QC Manual. Section E: Stream Habitat. 

Revision No. 1, June 1994. 

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. 303(d) List Specific Assessment Information for 

Streams. On-line. http://www.epa.state.il.us/water/tmdl/303-appendix/2010/appendix-b2-

streams-draft-3-26-10.pdf 

Illinois Natural History Survey. On-line Fish Collection Database. Updated May 10, 2010. Online. http://ellipse.inhs.uiuc.edu:591/INHSCollections/fishsearch.html 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Illinois Stream Mitigation Guidance, Stream Mitigation Method 

for Processing Section 404 Clean Water Act Permit Applications in the State of Illinois. 

Version 1.0, March 2010. 
	ABC	 FFB	BF		 	DCF	AFEFC		

DEC	FC	C	DF	FF	E			 	 !	"#$#	

		CBF	BF	 $$	

FIGURES 

1 – Location Map for the Eola Main Line Improvements section of the Project area 

2a and 2b – Survey Limits for the Eola Main Line Improvements section of the 

Project area 

3 – Off site Mitigation Alternative Map the Eola Main Line Improvements section 

of the Project area 

 


Drainage 3 (Indian Creek)

Wetland Area 2

Drainage 1

Sampling Point 5

Sampling Point 3

Sampling Point 4

Drainage 2

Drainage 3

Drainage 3 (Indian Creek)

DATE

FIGURE

July 2010

2a

Z:\Projects\IDOT\115305_ARRA_HighSpRailGrant_App\map_docs\mxd\Environmental_Constraints.mxd\sept09\jcm

Waterways Technical Memo

Eola Main Line Improvements

0.09 0 0.09 0.045

I

Miles

Scale

Legend

Wetland Impacts

Survey Limits

Wetland Areas within Survey Limits

Desktop Determined Wetlands
BNSF

Eola Road Marsh age 1

Drainage 2

Night Heron Marsh

Sampling Points 1 and 2

e 2

DATE

FIGURE

July 2010

2

Z:\Projects\IDOT\115305_ARRA_HighSpRailGrant_App\map_docs\mxd\Environmental_Constraints.mxd\sept09\jcm

Waterways Technical Memo

Eola Main Line Improvements

0.1 0 0.1 0.05

I

Miles

Scale

Legend

Wetland Impacts

Survey Limits

Wetland Areas within Survey Limits

Desktop Determined Wetlands

b
Proposed Main Line

Improvements

KANE CO DUPAGE CO

DATE

FIGURE

July 2010

3

Z:\Projects\IDOT\115305_ARRA_HighSpRailGrant_App\map_docs\mxd\Eola_Yard\Stream_Mitigation.mxd\july10\jcm

Off-Site Stream Mitigation

Waterways Tech Memo

0.3 0.15 0 0.3

Miles

Scale

Legend

Proposed Main Line Improvements

Eola Yard Environmental Survey Limits

Stream Mitigation
	ABC	 FFB	BF		 	DCF	AFEFC		

DEC	FC	C	DF	FF	E			 	 !	"#$#	

		CBF	BF	

ATTACHMENTS 

A – Site Observation Photo Log 

B – IEPA SHAP Data Sheet 

C – Typical Section of Instream Mitigation Features 

	ABC	 FFB	BF		 	DCF	AFEFC		

DEC	FC	C	DF	FF	E			 	 !	"#$#	

		CBF	BF	

Attachment A – Site Observation Photo Log 





	ABCDEFDDDFDFEFDBFEABDDDBAEBD	DEFDFDFDBDDFD E !EDFDD"EBFD#$

	ABCDFDEFDBAEBD	DEBBDABCDBFDAFABDFDFDBDDFD E %EDFDD"EBFD#BD




	ABCDFEFDEFDFD&'EC BF!D"FD(D)ACFD*BD+ED,D E -EDE.EBFDFDFD(.FDEEDD

	ABCDEFDEFDFDFABDDBEFEDFE,DEBBDAFABDFD E !EDFEFDDDA,'EFD!DFDBDFE	D


/

	ABCDFD,DFDF'DDFD,EB	,BFDEFDFDBEFEDFE,DEBBDEBDE.EBFDA'EAEBDCFEFAB

	ABCDEFDEFDFDABEDEABECDEFDEDAFDDAFDA'EAEBDCFEFABDEBD,D,DDEDFDFF,DF,DEFDB!EBD


0

	ABCDEFDEFDFDEABECDEFDEDAFDDDBFADFDECD'EFDDAE,BFDECE

	ABCDEFDEFDFDFE,DEBBDDBAEBD	DEBCDFDFBDBE!DDFD(.FDEED
FFB	BF		 	DCF	AFEFC		 	ABC	

DEC	FC	C	DF	FF	E			 	 !	"#$#	

		CBF	BF	

Attachment B – IEPA SHAP Data Sheet 



	ABC	 FFB	BF		 	DCF	AFEFC		

DEC	FC	C	DF	FF	E			 	 !	"#$#	

		CBF	BF	

Attachment C – Typical Section of Instream Mitigation Features 





Attachments Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Attachment 6 

Wyanet Connection Aquatic/Stream Impact analysis 

Conceptual Mitigation Technical Memorandum 

	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEF

EFEEEDFDED	EED	

Chicago to Iowa Ci

Wyanet Connectio

and Co

INTRODUCTION 

As part of the FY2010 High-Spee

Federal Railroad Administration (

Transportation (Illinois DOT) pro

concerning the potential effects o

Iowa Interstate Railroad and the B

The purpose of this technical mem

resources and anticipated environ

of a new track connection at Wya

Intercity Passenger Rail Service P

location of the Wyanet Connectio

proposed action, the purpose of a

proposed action are provided in th

(EA) published in September 200

Should FRA approve Illinois DO

process for the Wyanet Connectio

connection, complete a tier 2 proj

undertake detailed avoidance and

for the connection. Following the

of appropriate permits, Illinois DO

AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT

This technical memo describes th

Wyanet Track Connection section

Wyanet Connection section of the

aquatic resources in this section o

habitat quality as well as a discus

condition. The assessment of exis

tributary of West Bureau Creek (

at one representative sample reac

observations is included in Attach

the entire stream that may be affe

EFE

Technical 

 City Intercity Passenger Rail 

tion Aquatic/Stream Impact A

onceptual Mitigation Plan 

peed Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) Grant Appl

n (FRA) has requested that the Illinois Departmen

provide, at the “service level,” more site-specific i

s of the construction of a new railroad connection b

e BNSF Railway near Wyanet, Illinois (Wyanet C

emo is to characterize the affected environment fo

ronmental consequences to these resources from th

yanet, Bureau County, Illinois, for the Chicago to

Project (the proposed action) (see Figure 1 for th

tion section of the Project area). Detailed discussio

and need for the proposed action, and alternative

the original Tier 1 Service Level Environmental A

009. 

OT’s HSIPR grant application, the next steps in th

ction will be to complete preliminary engineering f

roject level National Environmental Policy Act (N

nd minimization evaluations, and apply for all app

 the approval of the project level NEPA document 

 DOT will undertake final design and construction

T

 the existing conditions of the aquatic resources w

tion of the Project area (see Figure 2 for an aerial v

 the Project area). The assessment of existing cond

of the Project area includes background informat

ussion of biological quality, water quality, and geo

xisting conditions focuses on Pond Creek, a thirdk (see Figure 2). Field observations were made on J

ach of Pond Creek. A photo log and key map of th

achment A. The observed reach of Pond Creek is r

ffected by the Wyanet Connection. 

C

al Memo

il Service -

t Analysis 

plication, the 

ent of 

information 

n between the 

t Connection). 

t for aquatic 

 the construction 

 to Iowa City 

r the general 

ssions of the 

ives to the 

tal Assessment

n the development 

g for the 

NEPA) review, 

ppropriate permits 

nt and the receipt 

on.

within the 

l view of the 

nditions for the 

ation on aquatic 

 geomorphic 

-order perennial 

on June 30, 2010, 

f the site 

 is representative of 
	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD $ED#E

C  	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE

 EFEEEDFDED	EED	

Background Information 

The Wyanet Connection section of the Project area is within the Lower Illinois RiverSenachwine Lake Watershed, hydrologic unit code (HUC) 8 (07130001), within the Pond CreekBig Bureau Creek sub-basin HUC 12 (071300010701) (see Figure 3). This section the Project 

area contains numerous aquatic resources including: one primary perennial stream, Pond Creek, 

and several smaller intermittent and ephemeral tributaries. The site also contains forested 

wetlands along the stream banks and one large emergent pond/wetland (see Figure 4). A 

discussion and maps of the delineated wetlands within the Wyanet Connection section of the 

Project area is provided in the Wetlands Delineation Report conducted by the Illinois Natural 

History Survey (INHS) (Attachment B). 

Pond Creek can be characterized as a typical Midwestern headwater stream in that it has been 

heavily influenced by agricultural land practices. Historical aerial photography from 1941 (see 

Figure 5) and U.S. Geological Survey USGS topographic mapping (see Figure 6) indicate that 

this stream has been substantially altered through channelization. The 1923 15-minute series 

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic mapping (see Figure 7) provides the earliest post 

settlement documentation of the channelization of Pond Creek. Furthermore, presettlement land 

cover data provide some insight into the original stream channel and its relation to West Bureau 

Creek (see Figure 8). The presettlement stream channel of Pond Creek was mapped near the 

current channel, within an extensive prairie landscape. High-quality remnant prairie sites have 

been identified within the right-of-way of the IAIS railroad. Because of their rarity, species 

diversity, and vulnerability to habitat degradation, prairie communities are of special concern in 

Illinois. These sites have been surveyed by INHS and have been determined to represent Grade 

A- to Grade B Illinois Natural Areas Inventory (INAI) quality sites (Attachment B). Grade A 

and B designation is reserved for only the highest quality prairie remnants. These sites have a 

low abundance of exotic species, high density of forb species, high diversity of forb species 

diversity, and the presence of conservative prairie species (Handle and Kuntz, 2004). 

Biological Quality 

The biological quality of a stream is best assessed through detailed field sampling of various groups 

of aquatic species (fish, macroinvertebrates, mussels, crayfish, amphibians, etc.) conducted according 

to Illinois-approved methodologies. When detailed sampling data are unavailable, consultation with 

the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) Stream Rating System provides some insight 

into regional biological quality. According to the Illinois Biological Stream Rating System (IDNR, 

2008), Pond Creek is not listed as a Biologically Significant Stream (BSS) and it is not rated as A or 

B for diversity or integrity. West Bureau Creek, located approximately 2 miles downstream, is rated 

as Class B (high) for diversity and is rated as Class C (moderate) for integrity (see Figure 9) 

immediately upstream of the confluence with Pond Creek. These IDNR stream ratings indicate that 

West Bureau Creek is fully functional according to its biological communities. 

A search of the Illinois Natural History Survey (INHS) Fish Collection Database did not identify 

any records from Pond Creek; however, INHS records from West Bureau Creek indicate that 

more than 30 species of fish have been collected from this downstream tributary (see Table 1). 

Based on the proximity to and downstream connection with West Bureau Creek, many of these 

fish species may also be present within Pond Creek. Field observations conducted on June 30, 

2010, indicate that Pond Creek is functioning biologically and is a productive resource. Water 

clarity during the site visit was excellent, allowing observation throughout the stream channel 
$ED#E 	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD

	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE  C

EFEEEDFDED	EED	 %

habitats. Numerous leopard frogs jumped from the banks of the stream, moving upstream during 

the site visit. Several species of fish, including minnows and sunfish, were observed within the 

deeper pools and runs of the stream. Many damselfly and dragonfly adults were also observed 

using the Pond Creek channel and adjacent emergent wetlands. In general, Pond Creek is a 

relatively homogenous stream environment; however, it still provides suitable habitat conditions 

for many different species of aquatic animals. 

Table 1: Illinois Natural History Fish Collection Database 

# Genus species Common Name Stream 

	ABAC 	ABCDEF	B	

DAEFBFAA	FAC FBEFDEF	B	

DAEFE	 	BBE	DEF	B	

DABFBFFF	 DAFE	DEF	B	

DE	CCACB	 CEADEF	B	

DE	CCAECFEBA F ADEF	B	

!BFBFACACCA "BFBCBFDEF	B	

#BFBFA	 $A%CBFDEF	B	

&BFBFAEBAC 'B(FABFCBFDEF	B	

)E	BC	A	 *FAA(E	DEF	B	

BACE	BAB ABBF EADEF	B	

AEBAAEE	 +,BB,%DEF	B	

EFA	CC -E	 EADEF	B	

EFAF 	(DEF	B	

CFEAC FCADEF	B	

BABC C EADEF	B	

!FEBFCF ,B,	FABEEDEF	B	

#FFBFA	 BCAEDEF	B	

&FFBFAB -CCAEDEF	B	

)FFBFAAFCEFB AFABCCAEDEF	B	

FFBBAB .%ABCA	DEF	B	

FBFEAB	F /,BCEADEF	B	

FBFEC		 0EADEF	B	

FBFEFAC (,	FAEADEF	B	

FBFEC	 BCEADEF	B	

FBCA FBFDEF	B	

!	AAEF 1(ADEF	B	

#	AACABA BECCBFDEF	B	

&	AFAC 	,	FA,DEF	B	

)EAC	FBAB 	FE,DEF	B	

EACEFCA "BFABC,DEF	B	

!	BABABC BECBDEF	B	

"FBCABFACAB A	DEF	B	

"F#CC	FABACBF$DFCCBF	%ABAA&

BBE#''CCE(	((#)*+'"DFCCBF	'A(BC&BF	,C+&&-.+.(/////////(
	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD $ED#E

C  	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE

& EFEEEDFDED	EED	

Water Quality 

Water Quality standards in Illinois are determined by the Watershed Management Section 

(WMS) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA). In addition to setting state 

limits on water quality, IEPA administers the state 401 certification program. A typical 401 

project certification process includes: 1) a detailed antidegradation review according to state 

standards, 2) a public notice, 3) posting of an antidegradation fact sheet, 4) IEPA review of the 

comments received, 5) IEPA decision to hold a public hearing, and 6) preparation of comment 

responses prior to the issuance of any certification. Typical 401 project level certification may 

take up to two or more years for IEPA to fully process. 

Water quality standards have been established for all surface waters in Illinois. Rivers and 

streams are rated based on the degree of support (attainment) of a designated use. Ratings are 

determined by an analysis of various types of information, including biological, 

physicochemical, physical habitat, and toxicity data. When sufficient data are available, each 

applicable designated use in each segment is assessed as Fully Supporting (good), Not 

Supporting (fair), or Not Supporting (poor). Waters in which at least one applicable use is not 

fully supported are considered “impaired.” The water quality of streams within Illinois can be 

assessed by consulting the IEPA Integrated Water Quality Report and Section 303(d) List of 

Impaired Waters (IEPA, 2010). 

According to the 2010 Section 303(d) list, Pond Creek was not assessed (see Table 2) as part of 

the 2010 study. West Bureau Creek was assessed as fully supporting aquatic life (582), and not 

supporting primary contact for fecal coliform – (400). The source of the fecal coliform 

impairment is unknown (140). 

Table 2: 2010 IEPA 303(d) List - Specific Assessment Information for Pond Creek 

Name Assessment

Unit ID 

10-Digit 

HUC 

IEPA

Basin Cat. Size (miles) 

Use 

Attainment* Causes Sources 

2C

31455+)!))))!)6

7#87#8

7#87#8

7&)

*9+*9+

DEF

	B	



31455:))!))))6!

"#87#8

*#87#8

7&)

)))

012	FBA3$2CCEEFB	32	FBEEFB	3)4-2EAF	BAB3)452F	EBF	6)4)2

AABC3)472F	AF	BAB83)*.2ABBACB(

The major potential causes of impairment within Illinois streams are fecal coliform bacteria 

impairing swimming (582-primary contact) use, mercury, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 

in fish tissue impairing (583-fish consumption) use, and low dissolved oxygen, high nutrients, 

excessive siltation, physical-habitat alterations, and high suspended solids which impair 

(585-aquatic life) use (IEPA, 2010). 

Geomorphic Condition 

As mentioned above, Pond Creek has been subject to numerous alterations. Based on historical 

aerial photographs and USGS topographic mapping, these alterations were likely undertaken 

during the drainage boom of the late 1800s or early 1900s. During this time, farmers began 
$ED#E 	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD

	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE  C

EFEEEDFDED	EED	 '

transforming native prairie into highly productive farmland by installing a network of clay tiles. 

The tiles drained into excavated channels (ditches) that conveyed water from fields into the 

natural streams. Natural streams such as Pond Creek were often dredged, leveed, and 

straightened to speed the flow of water away from farm fields. Within the Wyanet Connection 

section of the Project area, Pond Creek was most likely relocated and channelized during the 

initial construction of the IAIS rail line in the mid 1800s. Since this time, the Pond Creek 

channel has been under gradual recovery and has redeveloped some natural features such as 

point bars, riffles, and pools. The existing geomorphic condition was assessed by observation of 

both the channel condition and the hydrological condition within Pond Creek. In addition, the 

IEPA Qualitative Stream Habitat Assessment Procedure (SHAP) was performed for the reach of 

Pond Creek that would be affected by the Wyanet Connection. 

Channel and Hydrological Condition 

Within the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area, Pond Creek is located at the base of a 

large trapezoidal-shaped channel, approximately 15 to 20 feet below top of bank. The stream has 

been heavily incised, straightened, confined, and isolated from the majority of its riparian 

floodplain; however, the channel does maintain a riparian wetland bench approximately 50 to 75 

feet wide. The bench is approximately 1 to 2 feet above the wetted channel under normal base 

flow and appears to be frequently inundated as flood waters increase after rain events. The 

bank’s slopes are approximately 1.5:1 (H:V) from the toe of the bench to the top of the bank. The 

slopes are very steep; however, they appeared stable and were well vegetated from the edge of 

the water to the top of the bank. 

Herbaceous wetland vegetation was present along the margins of the channel and submergent 

vegetation was present within the channel. The wetted width of the Pond Creek channel 

measures approximately 30 to 50 feet within the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 

and maintains a relatively even depth of flow of approximately 2.0 feet. Substrate throughout the 

channel is composed of course and fine sands with some silt deposition along the littoral 

margins. The stream is slightly constricted by two large open-bottom arched culverts in the IAIS 

railroad embankment and then again by similar culverts in the BNSF railroad embankment. The 

large open-bottom arched culverts within the existing rail embankments downstream of the 

proposed connection do not appear to critically impede or constrict flow; however, under 

low-flow conditions, they may impede the upstream movement of aquatic animals. Pond Creek 

becomes much more natural downstream of the BNSF rail line and eventually flows into West 

Bureau Creek. 

Qualitative Stream Habitat Assessment Procedure (SHAP) 

During the field survey conducted on June 30, 2010, observations of Pond Creek for the 

15 habitat metrics were mostly within the fair to poor category, generating a total score of 74 out 

of 208. This score indicates that the habitat within the affected reach has not been able to fully 

recover from the impacts of channelization that occurred at the turn of the century. In general, 

the bank zone habitat and substrate habitat within the channelized reach of Pond Creek is very 

homogenous. This reach maintains little channel sinuosity and lacks typical riffle –pool 

sequencing in natural unaltered streams.. The majority of the stream habitat within Pond Creek 

is similar in flow, depth, substrate, and velocity and can be characterized as a run or glide 

habitat. The riparian vegetation surrounding stream is a mix of both herbaceous and woody 

species. In some areas, bush honeysuckle has completely eliminated all other species within the 
	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD $ED#E

C  	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE

( EFEEEDFDED	EED	

riparian corridor. The slopes are well vegetated, stable, and provide a good mix of canopy cover. 

See Attachment C for the completed SHAP form. 

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES 

The environmental consequences of the proposed action would result in the relocation of 

approximately 2,050 feet of Pond Creek. The following analysis of these impacts includes a 

discussion of the direct effects of the proposed action as well as the potential indirect effects. 

Direct Effects 

Construction of the Wyanet Connection would fill and relocate approximately 2,050 linear feet 

of Pond Creek as part of the construction of a new rail embankment. This direct effect would 

alter the current stream channel and would result in the temporary loss of this channelized stream 

habitat for numerous aquatic and terrestrial organisms, including fish, amphibians, invertebrates, 

and mammals. As the embankment is constructed, a new more natural channel would be 

reconstructed north of the new embankment to enhance the existing habitat for these species. 

During construction, Pond Creek would be affected physically, chemically, and biologically. The 

biological functions of Pond Creek would be affected by the loss of habitat during construction. 

The biological functions within Pond Creek include habitat, refugia, food production, 

reproduction, and dispersal. The chemical integrity of Pond Creek can be defined as the natural 

composition and properties of various substances within the aquatic system. Impacts on the 

chemical functions within Pond Creek would include alteration of nutrient cycling, particulate 

retention, organic carbon export, removal and sequestration of elements and compounds, and 

diminished water quality. The physical functions can be characterized as the hydrological 

attributes of a particular stream. Impacts on the physical functions of Pond Creek would include 

alteration of the natural flow regime, flood attenuation ability, storm water reduction, 

groundwater exchange, and maintenance of natural thermal regimes. 

Indirect Effects 

Indirect effects would include impacts both upstream and downstream of the channel relocation. 

Indirect effects upstream of the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area would include 

impacts on aquatic organism movement and disruption of the current hydrological regime. 

Downstream impacts on biota and habitat may also result from construction of the new 

connection. During construction, changes in the hydrological flow may have indirect effects on 

downstream habitat. Furthermore, after construction, the new channel would require time to 

adjust. During the channel adjustment period, downstream habitat areas may indirectly change 

through scour and/or accretion; however, these impacts are likely to be short term and localized 

to areas immediately downstream of this section of the Project area. 
$ED#E 	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD

	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE  C

EFEEEDFDED	EED	 )

POTENTIAL MITIGATION MEASURES 

As stated above, construction of the Wyanet Connection would impact approximately 

2,050 linear feet of Pond Creek and its associated riparian wetlands. To offset the loss of aquatic 

habitat, mitigation for these resources would be required. The following paragraphs and figures 

referenced describe a conceptual mitigation plan. 

In March of 2010, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) produced a regulatory guidance 

document that provides detailed guidance for stream mitigation in Illinois (USACE, 2010). This 

guidance document was designed to facilitate Clean Water Act Section 404 permit applications 

and provides a standard way to assess adverse impacts and to determine the amount of mitigation 

required. 

Mitigation for the impacts on Pond Creek could be accomplished through a combination of 

restoration alternatives, including: 

1. On-site replacement and enhancement of the current functions Pond Creek through 

development of a more natural channel 

2. Off-site enhancement of downstream habitat within the Pond Creek watershed 

3. On-site wetland development within a newly developed riparian corridor 

4. Purchase of stream/wetland mitigation credits from an approved mitigation bank 

Preliminary analysis of on-site mitigation alternatives indicated that on-site mitigation options 

were limited by many natural and anthropogenic constraints. Given the complex nature of the 

Pond Creek system and the on-site constraints, the relocation of Pond Creek must be performed 

along the north side of the new rail connection (see Figure 10). The on-site channel mitigation 

would increase the total channel length by 1.5 times the existing length by introducing 

meandering to the new channel. The new channel would measure approximately, 3,000 linear 

feet and would replace the current hydrological functions performed by Pond Creek while also 

enhancing the quality of the habitat by incorporating multiple in-stream treatments such as cross 

veins, j-hooks, porous weirs, newberry riffles, or root wads. These structures would be 

strategically located within the new channel to optimize their effect on scour and deposition. 

Attachment D depicts various typical sections for the various in-stream treatment options. 

Installation of channel treatments would enhance the heterogeneity of the substrate, aid the 

development of riffle–pool sequencing, and restore a more natural width-to-depth ratio of the 

channelized reach of Pond Creek. 

Additionally, the new stream channel would be constructed with a riparian bench to 

accommodate overbank flooding and natural wetland development. The wetland bench would be 

constructed with slopes conducive to the establishment of wetland vegetation. In addition to the 

planting of the wetland bench, the site would be managed to eliminate the establishment of 

exotic species through routine maintenance of the restored stream corridor. Detailed, site-specific 

mitigation plans will be developed during the tier 2 project level NEPA process. 

Off-site enhancement of stream resources within the Pond Creek watershed will also be included 

in the mitigation plan. Due to on-site constraints, additional mitigation downstream of the 

proposed connection will be proposed to further mitigate for the loss of aquatic habitat associated 

with the Wyanet Connection. As Pond Creek flows downstream and southeast through the BNSF 

embankment, the stream channel becomes much more natural and meandrous (see Figure 11), 
	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD $ED#E

C  	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE

* EFEEEDFDED	EED	

making this section of stream an ideal location for further enhancement, restoration, and 

protection. The off-site channel enhancement location is close to the Hennepin Canal State Park, 

making potential deeding to IDNR a potential alternative. 

Approximately 2,050 linear feet of stream would be enhanced through a combination of exotic 

species removal, wetland planting, bank stabilization, and/or installation of the appropriate 

instream treatments such as cross veins, j-hooks, porous weirs, newberry riffles, or root wads. 

Exact locations for the downstream mitigation measures have not been selected at this point; 

detailed surveys to identify specific mitigation sites will be conducted during the tier 2 project 

level NEPA process. 

FUTURE PHASES OF THE PROJECT 

Illinois DOT and Iowa DOT are currently applying for a grant from FRA through the HSIPR. If 

FRA approves the grant application, Service Development Plan, and Tier 1 EA, the next step in 

the development process will be to conduct a detailed tier 2 project level NEPA review of the 

various Project elements. During the tier 2 process, numerous environmental surveys will be 

conducted at a more defined scale. The tier 2 project level NEPA review will also include an 

evaluation of the full range of alternatives, impact assessment and proposed mitigation 

development, including permit applications. It is also important to note that the detailed 

engineering and alternative analysis will be concurrent with the tier 2 project level NEPA 

review. Illinois DOT will coordinate the future tier 2 project level NEPA reviews with all of the 

appropriate federal and state agencies, including IDNR, and will work with these agencies to 

identify the best alternatives to avoid and minimize impacts on aquatic resource features. 
$ED#E 	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD

	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE  C

EFEEEDFDED	EED	 +

REFERENCES 

Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2008. Integrating Multiple Taxa in a Biological 

Stream Rating System. Illinois State Wildlife Grant Program Report. Springfield, Illinois. 

34 p. http://dnr.state.il.us/orc/biostrmratings/

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. 303(d) List Specific Assessment Information for 

Streams. On-line. http://www.epa.state.il.us/water/tmdl/303-appendix/2010/appendixb2-streams-draft-3-26-10.pdf 

Illinois Natural History Survey. On-line Fish Collection Database. Updated May 10, 2010. Online. http://ellipse.inhs.uiuc.edu:591/INHSCollections/fishsearch.html 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Illinois Stream Mitigation Guidance, Stream Mitigation Method 

for Processing Section 404 Clean Water Act Permit Applications in the State of Illinois. 

Version 1.0, March 2010. 

Handel, W.C. and J. Koontz. 2004. Inventory of Roadside Prairies. Illinois Department of 

Transportation Illinois Natural History Survey Center for Biodiversity. Technical Report. 

FIGURES 

1. Location Map for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 

2. 2005 Aerial Photograph for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 

3. Watershed Map for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 

4. Wetlands and Waterways Map for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 

5. 1941 Historical Aerial Photograph for the Wyanet Connection s section of the Project 

area 

6. USGS Topographic Map for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 

7. 1923 Historic USGS Topographic Map for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project 

area 

8. Presettlement Land Cover Map for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 

9. IDNR Stream Rating Map for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 

10. On-site Mitigation Alternative Map for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 

11. Off-site Mitigation Alternative Map for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project 

area 

	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD $ED#E

	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE C

EFEEEDFDED	EED	 

 Figure 1: Location Map for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 

 
$ED#E 	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD

	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE C

EFEEEDFDED	EED	 

Figure 2: 2005 Aerial Photograph for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 
	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD $ED#E

C  	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE

 EFEEEDFDED	EED	

Figure 3: Watershed Map for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 
$ED#E 	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD

	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE C

EFEEEDFDED	EED	 %

Figure 4: Wetlands and Waterways Map for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 
	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD $ED#E

C  	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE

& EFEEEDFDED	EED	

Figure 5: 1941 Historical Aerial Photograph for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 
$ED#E 	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD

	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE C

EFEEEDFDED	EED	 '

Figure 6: USGS Topographic Map for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 
	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD $ED#E

C  	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE

( EFEEEDFDED	EED	

Figure 7: 1923 Historic USGS Topographic Map for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 
$ED#E 	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD

	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE C

EFEEEDFDED	EED	 )

Figure 8: Presettlement Land Cover Map for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 
	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD $ED#E

C  	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE

* EFEEEDFDED	EED	

Figure 9: IDNR Stream Rating Map for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 
$ED#E 	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD

	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE C

EFEEEDFDED	EED	 +

Figure 10: On-site Mitigation Alternative Map for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 
	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD $ED#E

C  	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE

 EFEEEDFDED	EED	

Figure 11: Off-site Mitigation Alternative Map for the Wyanet Connection section of the Project area 

	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD $ED#E

	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE  C

EFEEEDFDED	EED	

ATTACHMENTS 

A – Site Observation Photo Log 

B - INHS Wetland Delineation Report / INHS Prairie Report 

C – IEPA SHAP Data Sheet 

D – Typical Section of Instream Mitigation Features 

	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD $ED#E

	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE  C

EFEEEDFDED	EED	

Attachment A – Site Observation Photo Log 





	AABCDEFCCDADCDEADBAFCE

	AABCDEFAC DDAADBAFCE




	AABCDE!DDCCCCDCC"#$%&'CDEC D(#A ADD CADC

)	AABCDEDA*AC"DBD*ADB+A*AE$,$'CA




-	AABCDE*A"  (AD"AA (*CCD$,$'C"DBD

.	AABCDEAA*$,$'CAA*CCDADBAACD


)

	A+AEA"(ADE"DBAADB

/&AD# BCD(CCDA0 DAC"DBD


-

1	AABCDEA*D#C  CADAADB2DAC "2*(E"DB

	AABCDE*34ADB2DAC "E(ECADADE"DBA


.

	AABCDE#C AADEDA"DBAADB2AAA5C#-6

#AD* # AADCDA*ADADE"DB*A*DAAADE




7#C CDECDD"*CCD0AC#A DD

)7#C C"EA DD


/

-7#C  AECDD"*CCDAACADA DD

.7#C ED*DCDEEA DD


1

	AABCDEA*CCDADB#C "DBCEA-8AAA"DB

	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD $ED#E

	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE  C

EFEEEDFDED	EED	

Attachment B 

INHS Wetland Delineation Report 

(This report is included as Attachment 8 to the 

Tier 1 Service Level Environmental Assessment Supplemental Information)

Supplemental INHS Prairie Report 

(This report is included as Attachment 11 to the 

Tier 1 Service Level Environmental Assessment Supplemental Information) 

	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD $ED#E

	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE  C

EFEEEDFDED	EED	

Attachment C – IEPA SHAP Data Sheet 



	 	FEA!	DCD"DE!	#		DD $ED#E

	AB	CAD	EF	CEDEFEFE  C

EFEEEDFDED	EED	

Attachment D – Typical Section of Instream Mitigation Features 





Attachments Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Attachment 7 

Eola Main Line Improvements Wetland Delineation Report 

Attachments Wetland Delineation 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service July 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 1 

Technical Memo

Wetland Report for Chicago to Iowa City Intercity 

Passenger Rail - Eola Main Line Improvements 

July 2010 

 Prepared for: Illinois DOT and Iowa DOT 

INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT SUMMARY 

In 2009, the Illinois Department of Transportation (Illinois DOT) and Iowa Department of 

Transportation (Iowa DOT) prepared a Service Level (Tier 1) Environmental Assessment (2009 

EA) describing the potential environmental impacts from reestablishing intercity passenger rail 

service between Chicago and Iowa City. The 2009 EA was submitted to Federal Railroad 

Administration (FRA) as part of Illinois DOT and Iowa DOT High-speed Intercity Passenger 

Rail Program grant application. The 2009 grant application was not successful. However, Illinois 

DOT and Iowa DOT are submitting a new grant application to FRA for consideration of funding 

the intercity passenger rail service between Chicago and Iowa City under the FRA’s 2010 Notice 

of Funding Availability for Service Development Programs under the HSIPR Program. As part 

of the 2010 HSIPR Grant Application, Illinois DOT and Iowa DOT intend to resubmit the 2009 

EA with supplemental information, including this description of possible impacts to aquatic 

resources from the Eola Main Line Improvements and conceptual mitigation for those impacts. 

The Eola Main Line Improvements are a component of the set of required infrastructure 

improvements that would be required to reestablish intercity passenger rail service between 

Chicago and Iowa City (Figure 1). Detailed discussions of the purpose and need and a 

description of the Eola Main Line Improvements are included in Chapters 1 and 2 of the 

Supplemental Information to the 2009 EA. 

The Project area for this Wetland Report is the BNSF Railway (BNSF) Eola Rail Yard located 

within Aurora, Illinois. The Project is located in Sections 17 and 18 of Township 38 north, 

Range 9 east of DuPage County, Illinois, and Sections 13 and 14 of Township 38 north, Range 8 

east of Kane County (See Figure 1). 

HDR conducted a wetland observation of the Project area on July 6, 2010, to identify wetlands 

within it (See Figure 1). 

 
Wetland Delineation Technical Memo 

July 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

2 Service Level Environmental Assessment 

WETLAND SITES SUMMARY 

HDR conducted a wetland and waters of the U.S. identification on behalf of Illinois DOT on July 

6, 2010, at the Eola Yard. The following sources were used to determine the wetland boundaries 

and waters of the U.S. locations: 

• Soil Survey of DuPage and Kane County, Illinois 

• United State Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps 

• National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps 

• 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 

1987) 

• Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: 

Midwest Region (U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, 2008) 

• NRCS, USDA, Web Soil Survey 

The survey limits were within the Eola Yard, which presented several constraints for completing 

full routine wetland delineation. The challenges included safety of the delineators and previous 

disturbances of the area due to the construction of the rail yard. Observing the soil profile was 

difficult due to the presence of fill material (gravel and cobble-sized ballast) associated with the 

construction of the rail yard; in most cases, the upland area was ballast, which created distinct 

wetland boundaries. Wetland boundaries were determined by on-site observations, as well as offsite or desktop analysis due to the constraints of conducting delineation inside a working rail 

yard. A “Routine Wetland Determination Data Form” was completed for accessible wetland and 

upland areas. In locations where it was difficult to document the soil profile, the hydrology and 

vegetation community were relied upon for the wetland determination. These forms are present 

in Attachment B. Sampling points and wetland boundaries were documented in the field and are 

shown on Figure 2. Non-wetland waters of the U.S. were also identified and further discussed in 

a Stream Assessment Technical Memo (HDR, 2010). 

In addition to the wetland observation within the survey limits, surrounding wetland areas were 

noted during the field visit and a desktop analysis was conducted. See Figure 2 for the desktop 

delineation for the areas outside of the survey limits. 

Also during the on-site observation, the Floristic Quality Index (FQI) was used to assess the 

ecological integrity of communities (Swink and Wilhelm, 1994; Taft et al., 1997). This index 

provides a measure for the quality or environmental integrity of each individual community. The 

FQI is calculated as follows: 

FQI = R/√N 

Where R represents the sum of the numerical ratings for all species recorded at the site and N 

represents the total number of recorded species. Numerical ratings for each species are shown in 

the species list for each community. Plants not native to Illinois are not scored. The mean 

Coefficient of Conservatism (mean C), defined as the sum of the numerical ratings divided by 

the total number of native Illinois species (R/N), was also determined. Although generalizations 

are problematic, for interpretive purposes it can be said that FQI values of ten or less for 

individual sites indicate low natural quality. Sites with FQI values of twenty or more (mean C > 

3.0) possess some evidence of native character and may be considered environmental assets. See 

Attachment D for the FQI for each area. 
Technical Memo Wetland Delineation 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service July 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 3 

EOLA YARD IMPROVEMENTS WETLAND OVERVIEW 

Brief narratives of the delineated wetlands that met all wetland criteria are presented below. 

Wetland Area 1 

The area characterized by Sampling Point 1 is located between the main tracks and a rail spur 

that extends south on the eastern edge of the Project area (See Attachment C- Photo Log). This 

area is a palustrine forested wetland (PFO) dominated by box elder (Acer negundo) and green 

ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica). The area appears to be altered on the eastern edge for a 

transmission corridor. A connection from this area to Night Heron Marsh occurs through culvert 

systems beneath the railroad spur. Night Heron Marsh is outside of the survey limits but is 

adjacent to the Project area. Night Heron Marsh is a persistent emergent wetland. 

Drainage 1 

Sampling Point 3 characterizes an unnamed drainage that conveys stormwater through the Eola 

Rail Yard culvert system (See Attachment C- Photo Log). The drainage extends east to west 

between a maintenance roadway and existing rail line. A culvert on the east end of the drainage 

conveys flow from Eola Road Marsh, a persistent emergent wetland. The culvert on the west end 

connects to Drainage 2 and 3. The eastern portion of the drainage has vegetation communities 

that include narrow leaf cattail (Typha angustifolia) and reed canary grass (Phalaris 

arundinacea). The western portion of the drainage is dominated by elderberry (Sambucus 

canadensis) (See Attachment B- Sampling Point 3). 

Drainage 2 

Drainage 2 displayed similar characteristics to the eastern portion of Drainage 1. It consists of a 

linear drainage with associated wetland fringe that was inaccessible during the field survey; 

therefore no Sampling Points were collected. The drainage is also connected to the culvert 

system that conveys stormwater and flow from the adjacent marshes to Indian Creek. The 

drainage is dominated by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) and narrow leaf cattail 

(Typha angustifolia). Hydrology was present displaying surface water, and soils were assumed to 

be hydric by referencing Sampling Point 3. 

Drainage 3 (Indian Creek) 

Drainage 3 displayed similar characteristics to the western portion of Drainage 1. Drainage 3 is a 

linear drainageway that extends from Eola Road Marsh to the west, connecting with the other 

drainages to convey stormwater. Two linear features are included for this drainage; a small 

feature extends east to west between the main tracks and southern rail spur, while a large feature 

extends east to west and continues to the western portion of the survey limits (See Figure 2). 

Drainage 3 also flows across the western portion of the survey limits for the Project (See 

Attachment B-Sampling Point 5). Some sources note this channel as Indian Creek; further 

discussion of the drainages and contribution to Indian Creek is contained in the Stream 

Assessment Technical Memorandum (HDR, 2010). Dominant vegetation included box elder 

(Acer negundo) and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica). Hydrology was present displaying 

surface water, and soils were assumed to be hydric due to inundation. 
Wetland Delineation Technical Memo 

July 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

4 Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Wetland Area 2 

This is an erosion feature located between an abandoned rail track and a fence along the 

boundary of the rail yard in western portion of the Project area. The area was observed during the 

wetland survey, but a Sampling Point was not collected due to constraints. The area conveys 

runoff through a 5-10 foot ditch that flows into a storm sewer pipeline. Dominant vegetation 

included reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea). 

Table 1: Wetland Determination Data Sheet Summary 

Area/Drainage Acres within Survey Limits 

We tla nd Are a 1 0.4 

Dra ina g e 1 2.8 

Dra ina g e 2 3.5 

Dra ina g e 3 1.6 

We tla nd Are a 2 0.1 

To ta l 8.4 

No te : Ac re s inc lud e c ulve rt syste m s tha t flo w b e ne a th 

the m a in ra il line s.

The wetland observation determined the wetland boundaries for the survey limits despite the 

constraints that occurred due to the Eola Yard location. For the proposed Preferred Alternative - 

Two Round-trip Trains per Day scenario, construction would impact approximately 1.7 acres, 

based on preliminary design. This direct effect would result in minor alteration to the current 

stream and stormwater conveyances. 

FUTURE PHASES OF THE PROJECT 

Should FRA approve the Illinois and Iowa DOTs’ 2010 HSIPR grant application, the next step in 

the development process would be to conduct a detailed Project Level (Tier 2) NEPA evaluation, 

including preliminary engineering and permitting. During this process, a detailed alternatives 

analysis would be conducted and additional wetland delineation would be conducted. During the 

alternatives analysis, additional sampling points would need to be collected within the Eola Rail 

Yard Project area. During the Project Level NEPA and permitting process, a mitigation plan to 

avoid, minimize, and mitigate for wetland impacts would be developed beyond a concept phase 

and coordinated with all appropriate federal and state agencies including the Illinois Department 

of Natural Resources (IDNR). Illinois DOT would work with these agencies to identify the best 

alternatives to avoid and minimize impacts to wetland resources. 

 
Technical Memo Wetland Delineation 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service July 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 5 

REFERENCES 

Cowardin, et al. December 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the 

United States. FWS/OBS-79/31. U.S. Department of Interior, Washington, D.C. 

HDR, 2010. Stream Assessment Technical Memo. 

Environmental Laboratory. January 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, 

Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2008. Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers 

Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region, ed. J.S. Wakely, R.W. Lichvar, and C.V. 

Noble. ERDC/EL TR-08-27. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and 

Development Center. 

Attachments Wetland Delineation 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service July 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Attachment A- Figures 

Attachments Wetland Delineation 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service July 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Figure 1: Project Location Map 

 
Attachments Technical Memo 

July 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

 Service Level Environmental Assessment 
Attachments Wetland Delineation 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service July 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Figure 2b: Analyzed Sites – DuPage County 

Attachments Wetland Delineation 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service July 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Attachment B- Data Sheets 

US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region – Interim Version 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Midwest Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): 

Slope (%): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI or WWI classification: 

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

VEGETATION – Use scientific names of plants.

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 Dominance Test is >50% 

 Prevalence Index is 3.01

 Morphological Adaptations1

 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1

 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

 = Total Cover 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

 = Total Cover 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

 = Total Cover 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1. 

2. 

 = Total Cover 

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

Eola Yard EA DuPage County July 6, 2010

Iowa DOT and Illinois DOT IL 1

J. Bartletti, R. Keith, and B. Baker Sec 18/17, T38N, R9E

Depression Concave

Drummer silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes PEMC

The sampling point characterized by this data sheet an inundated marsh connected to Night Heron Marsh. This area is a wetland due to the presence 

of hydrophytic vegetation, hydrology, and assumed hydric soils. Sampling point is located on the east end of the project limits.

30 ft

Acer negundo

Salix nigra

20

20

20

60

Y

Y

Y

FACW

FACWOBL

Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4

4

100

15 ft

0

0

0

0

5 ft

0

10

10

Y FACW+

0

Phalaris arundinacea

0

Dominate species were documented for the purposes of this data sheet, but a complete inventory of vegetation was completed for the FQI. 

Reset Form Print Form
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region – Interim Version 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) 

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) 

 Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 

 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: 

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

 Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9) 

 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

1

Hydric soils were assumed due to surface water, presence of obligate species, and geomorphic position. 

2-24

At Surface

At Surface

Area appears to remain inundated for long periods of time, and is connected to the Night Heron Marsh through culvert system. 
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region – Interim Version 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Midwest Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): 

Slope (%): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI or WWI classification: 

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

VEGETATION – Use scientific names of plants.

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 Dominance Test is >50% 

 Prevalence Index is 3.01

 Morphological Adaptations1

 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1

 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

 = Total Cover 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

 = Total Cover 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

 = Total Cover 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1. 

2. 

 = Total Cover 

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

Eola Yard EA DuPage County July 6, 2010

Iowa DOT and Illinois DOT IL 2

J. Bartletti, R. Keith, and B. Baker Sec. 18/17, T38N, R9E

Railroad embankment Concave

Drummer silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes N/A

The sampling point characterized by this data sheet upland to Sampling Point 2 and it the edge of existing railroad tracks. Sampling point is located on 

the east end of the project limits.

30 ft

3

0

0

15 ft

0

0

0

10 40

5 ft

30 150

Melilotus officinalis

Daucus pusillus

20

10

10

40

Y

Y

Y

UPL

FACU

UPL

40 190

Bromus inermis

4.75

Dominate species were documented for the purposes of this data sheet, but a complete inventory of vegetation was completed for the FQI. 

Reset Form Print Form
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region – Interim Version 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) 

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) 

 Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 

 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: 

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

 Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9) 

 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

2

Railroad Ballast

At Surface

Wetland area was to the edge of the railroad ballast, a restrictive layer that is not hydric.

None 

None

None

Sampling point is characteristic of the edge of the existing railroad track, therefore wetland hydrology was not present. 
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region – Interim Version 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Midwest Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): 

Slope (%): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI or WWI classification: 

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

VEGETATION – Use scientific names of plants.

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 Dominance Test is >50% 

 Prevalence Index is 3.01

 Morphological Adaptations1

 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1

 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

 = Total Cover 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

 = Total Cover 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

 = Total Cover 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1. 

2. 

 = Total Cover 

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

Eola Yard EA Kane County July 6, 2010

Iowa DOT and Illinois DOT IL 3

J. Bartletti, R. Keith, and B. Baker Sec. 14/13, T38N, R8E

Railroad ditch Concave

Orthents, loamy, undulating N/A

The sampling point characterized by this data sheet is linear waterway that is located between railroad track main line and maintenance road. Wetland 

fringe is associated with the linear waterway due to the presence of dominant hydrophytes, hydric soils, and presence of hydrology. 

2

3

67

15 ft

20

20

Sambucus canadensis Y FACW+

0

0

0

0

5 ft

0

Solidago canadensis

25

20

45

Y

Y

FACW+

FACU

0

Phalaris arundinacea

0

Dominant vegetation was noted for this data sheet, vegetation community was documented for FQI. 

Reset Form Print Form
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region – Interim Version 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) 

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) 

 Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 

 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: 

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

 Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9) 

 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

3

0-9

9-20

10YR 3/1

10YR 2/1 

80

100

10YR 5/6 20 C PL Silt loam

 Silt loam

Soil profile is previously disturbed due to development of the railroad embankments. 

3-4

9 

At Surface

Channels convey hydrology through rail yard from west to eastern end, along the main tracks. 
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region – Interim Version 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Midwest Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): 

Slope (%): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI or WWI classification: 

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

VEGETATION – Use scientific names of plants.

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 Dominance Test is >50% 

 Prevalence Index is 3.01

 Morphological Adaptations1

 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1

 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

 = Total Cover 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

 = Total Cover 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

 = Total Cover 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1. 

2. 

 = Total Cover 

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

Eola Yard EA Kane County July 6, 2010

Iowa DOT and Illinois DOT IL 4

J. Bartletti, R. Keith, and B. Baker Sec. 14/13, T38N, R8E

Ditch between two main rail lines Convex

Orthents, clayey, undulating N/A

The sampling point characterized by this data sheet is upland to Sampling Point 3. Area is on west side of Sampling Point 3 located within ditch area 

between two main rail tracks. 

1

2

50

0

10 20

70 210

20 80

5 ft

0

Trifolium repens

Rumex crispus

Phalaris arundinacea

60

20

10

10

100

Y

Y

N

N

FACFACU+

FAC+

FACW+

100 310

Poa pratensis

3.10

The area failed to display dominant hydrophytes.

Reset Form Print Form
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region – Interim Version 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) 

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) 

 Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 

 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: 

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

 Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9) 

 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

4

0-6 10YR 3/1 100 Silt loam

Ballast

6

A restrictive layer, railroad ballast, was present to the entire soil profile could not be observed. 

None

None

None

Area failed to display primary or two secondary hydrology indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region – Interim Version 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Midwest Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): 

Slope (%): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI or WWI classification: 

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

VEGETATION – Use scientific names of plants.

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 Dominance Test is >50% 

 Prevalence Index is 3.01

 Morphological Adaptations1

 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1

 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

 = Total Cover 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

 = Total Cover 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

 = Total Cover 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1. 

2. 

 = Total Cover 

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

Eola Yard EA Kane County July 6, 2010

Iowa DOT and Illinois DOT IL 5

J. Bartletti, R. Keith, and B. Baker Sec. 14/13, T38N, R8E

Drainageway Concave

Milford silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes N/A

The sampling point characterized by this data sheet is linear waterway with associated riparian buffer due to the presence of hydrophytic vegetation, 

hydrology, and assumed hydric soils. 

30 ft

Acer saccharinum

20

20

40

Y

Y

FACW

 FACW

Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5

5

100

15 ft

Sambucus canadensis

10

10

20

Y

Y

FACW

FACWFraxinus pennyslvanica

0

0

0

0

5 ft

0

20

20

Y FACW+

0

Phalaris arundinacea

0

Dominate species were documented for the purposes of this data sheet, but a complete inventory of vegetation was completed for the FQI. 

Reset Form Print Form
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region – Interim Version 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) 

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) 

 Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 

 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: 

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

 Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9) 

 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

5

Hydric soils were assumed due to inundation and geomorphic position. Intermittent stream bed was cobble. 

2-12

At Surface

0

Linear waterway with a wetted width of approximately 15 feet wide, and a depth of flowing water less than 12 inches. Waterway is a intermittent 

stream that flows east to west. This data form documents a portion of Indian Creek, that crosses beneath the rail tracks from south to north. 
Attachments Wetland Delineation 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service July 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Attachment C- Photo Log 

Attachments Wetland Delineation 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service July 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Sampling Point 1 – Wetland Area 1 located on the in the 

southeastern portion of the survey limits for the Project. Looking 

north. 

Sampling Point 1 – Wetland Area 1 located on the in the 

southeastern portion of the survey limits for the Project. Looking 

north. 
Attachments Wetland Delineation 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service July 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Sampling Point 1 and 2 – Sampling points on the south side of 

Wetland Area 1. Looking west. 

Sampling Point 3 – Drainage 1 was represented by Sampling 

Point 3 and flows east to west through the Eola Rail Yard. 

Looking east. 
Attachments Technical Memo 

July 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

 Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Sampling Point 3 – Sampling points on the south side of 

Drainage 1. Looking west. 

Drainage 1 – Segment of Drainage 1 located east of Sampling 

Point 3 area. Looking west. 
Attachments Wetland Delineation 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service July 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Drainage 1 – Segment of Drainage 1 east of Sampling Point 3 

area. Looking west. 

Drainage 2 – Linear drainage with associated wetland fringe. 

Looking west. 

Drainage 2 located 

between two main 

lines 
Attachments Technical Memo 

July 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

 Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Drainage 3 – Linear drainage that is located along the southern 

portion of the survey limits. Looking west. 

Sampling Point 5 – Drainage 3 (Indian Creek) located on the in 

the southwestern portion of the survey limits for the Project. 

Looking north. 
Attachments Wetland Delineation 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service July 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Sampling Point 5 – Drainage 3 (Indian Creek) located on the in 

the southwestern portion of the survey limits for the Project. 

Looking south 

Wetland Area 2 – Erosion feature located on northwest side of 

the survey limits conveying stormwater runoff. Looking east. 

 
Attachments Technical Memo 

July 2010 Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

 Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Attachment D- FQI 

Site: Wetland area 1

Locale: Between main tracks and spur line

Date: July 06, 2010 1 hours

By: JLB

File: c:\DOCUME~1\jbartlet\Desktop\FQA\studies\Eola_Wetland_1.inv

 FLORISTIC QUALITY DATA Native 21 75.0% Adventive 7 25.0% 

 21 NATIVE SPECIES Tree 7 25.0% Tree 0 0.0% 

 28 Total Species Shrub 2 7.1% Shrub 1 3.6% 

 2.0 NATIVE MEAN C W-Vine 1 3.6% W-Vine 0 0.0% 

 1.5 W/Adventives H-Vine 0 0.0% H-Vine 0 0.0% 

 9.4 NATIVE FQI P-Forb 5 17.9% P-Forb 1 3.6% 

 8.1 W/Adventives B-Forb 1 3.6% B-Forb 3 10.7% 

 -1.2 NATIVE MEAN W A-Forb 5 17.9% A-Forb 0 0.0% 

 -0.6 W/Adventives P-Grass 0 0.0% P-Grass 2 7.1% 

 AVG: Faculative (+) A-Grass 0 0.0% A-Grass 0 0.0% 

 P-Sedge 0 0.0% P-Sedge 0 0.0% 

 A-Sedge 0 0.0% A-Sedge 0 0.0% 

 Fern 0 0.0% 

ACRONYM C SCIENTIFIC NAME W WETNESS PHYSIOGNOMY COMMON NAME 

 

ACENEG 1 Acer negundo -2 FACW- Nt Tree BOXELDER 

 

ACESAI 1 Acer saccharinum -3 FACW Nt Tree SILVER MAPLE 

 

AMARUD 0 Amaranthus rudis -3 FACW Nt A-Forb TAMARISK WATERHEMP 

 

AMBART 0 Ambrosia artemisiifolia 3 FACU Nt A-Forb COMMON RAGWEED 

 

APOCAN 2 Apocynum cannabinum 0 FAC Nt P-Forb DOGBANE 

 

ARCMIN 0 ARCTIUM MINUS 5 UPL Ad B-Forb COMMON BURDOCK 

 

CONCAN 0 Conyza canadensis 1 FAC- Nt A-Forb HORSEWEED 

 

DAUCAR 0 DAUCUS CAROTA 4 FACU- Ad B-Forb QUEEN ANNE'S LACE 

 

EUPSER 1 Eupatorium serotinum -1 FAC+ Nt P-Forb LATE BONESET 

 

FRAPES 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica v. subintegerrima -3 FACW Nt Tree GREEN ASH 

 

GEUVER 1 Geum vernum 1 FAC- Nt P-Forb SPRING AVENS 

 

GLETRI 2 Gleditsia triacanthos 0 FAC Nt Tree HONEY LOCUST 

 

HORJUB 0 HORDEUM JUBATUM -1 FAC+ Ad P-Grass SQUIRREL-TAIL GRASS 

 

IMPCAP 2 Impatiens capensis -3 FACW Nt A-Forb SPOTTED TOUCH-ME-NOT 

 

LEMMIR 3 Lemna minor -5 OBL Nt A-Forb SMALL DUCKWEED 

 

LYSLAN 6 Lysimachia lanceolata 0 FAC Nt P-Forb LANCE-LEAVED LOOSESTRIFE 

 

MELOFC 0 MELILOTUS OFFICINALIS 3 FACU Ad B-Forb YELLOW SWEET CLOVER 

 

OENBIB 1 Oenothera biennis 3 FACU Nt B-Forb COMMON EVENING PRIMROSE 

 

PHAARU 0 PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA -4 FACW+ Ad P-Grass REED CANARY GRASS 

 

POPDEL 2 Populus deltoides -1 FAC+ Nt Tree EASTERN COTTONWOOD 

 

RHACAT 0 RHAMNUS CATHARTICA 3 FACU Ad Shrub COMMON BUCKTHORN 

 

RUBSTR 6 Rubus strigosus -2 FACW- Nt P-Forb RED RASPBERRY 

 

RUMCRP 0 RUMEX CRISPUS -1 FAC+ Ad P-Forb CURLY DOCK 

 

SALEXI 1 Salix exigua -5 OBL Nt Shrub SANDBAR WILLOW 

 

SALNIG 3 Salix nigra -5 OBL Nt Tree BLACK WILLOW 

 

SAMCAN 2 Sambucus canadensis 4 FACU- Nt Shrub COMMON ELDER 
 

ULMAME 5 Ulmus americana -2 FACW- Nt Tree AMERICAN ELM 

 

VITRIP 2 Vitis riparia -2 FACW- Nt W-Vine RIVERVBANK GRAPE 

 
Site: Sampling Point 3

Locale: Drainage 1 and 2

Date: July 06, 2010 1 hours

By: JLB

File: c:\DOCUME~1\jbartlet\Desktop\FQA\studies\Eola_Drainage_1_2.inv

 FLORISTIC QUALITY DATA Native 45 80.4% Adventive 11 19.6% 

 45 NATIVE SPECIES Tree 6 10.7% Tree 0 0.0% 

 56 Total Species Shrub 2 3.6% Shrub 1 1.8% 

 2.5 NATIVE MEAN C W-Vine 3 5.4% W-Vine 1 1.8% 

 2.0 W/Adventives H-Vine 0 0.0% H-Vine 0 0.0% 

 16.7 NATIVE FQI P-Forb 20 35.7% P-Forb 2 3.6% 

 15.0 W/Adventives B-Forb 2 3.6% B-Forb 4 7.1% 

 -1.6 NATIVE MEAN W A-Forb 4 7.1% A-Forb 0 0.0% 

 -1.0 W/Adventives P-Grass 3 5.4% P-Grass 2 3.6% 

 AVG: Fac. Wetland (-) A-Grass 0 0.0% A-Grass 1 1.8% 

 P-Sedge 3 5.4% P-Sedge 0 0.0% 

 A-Sedge 0 0.0% A-Sedge 0 0.0% 

 Fern 2 3.6% 

ACRONYM C SCIENTIFIC NAME W WETNESS PHYSIOGNOMY COMMON NAME 

 

ACENEG 1 Acer negundo -2 FACW- Nt Tree BOXELDER 

 

ALIPAM 2 Alisma plantago-aquatica v. americanum -5 OBL Nt P-Forb AMERICAN WATER PLANTAIN 

 

AMARUD 0 Amaranthus rudis -3 FACW Nt A-Forb TAMARISK WATERHEMP 

 

AMBART 0 Ambrosia artemisiifolia 3 FACU Nt A-Forb COMMON RAGWEED 

 

APOCAN 2 Apocynum cannabinum 0 FAC Nt P-Forb DOGBANE 

 

ARCMIN 0 ARCTIUM MINUS 5 UPL Ad B-Forb COMMON BURDOCK 

 

ASCINC 4 Asclepias incarnata -5 OBL Nt P-Forb SWAMP MILKWEED 

 

ASCSYR 0 Asclepias syriaca 5 UPL Nt P-Forb COMMON MILKWEED 

 

BOECYC 3 Boehmeria cylindrica -5 OBL Nt P-Forb FALSE NETTLE 

 

CAMRAD 2 Campsis radicans 0 FAC Nt W-Vine TRUMPET CREEPER 

 

CXNORM 4 Carex normalis -3 FACW Nt P-Sedge SPREADING OVAL SEDGE 

 

CXSQUA 5 Carex squarrosa -5 OBL Nt P-Sedge NARROW-LEAVED CATTAIL 

SEDGE 

CONCAN 0 Conyza canadensis 1 FAC- Nt A-Forb HORSEWEED 

 

DAUCAR 0 DAUCUS CAROTA 4 FACU- Ad B-Forb QUEEN ANNE'S LACE 

 

EQUARV 0 Equisetum arvense 0 FAC Nt Fern COMMON HORSETAIL 

 

EQUHYE 2 Equisetum hyemale affine -2 FACW- Nt Fern TALL SCOURING RUSH 

 

ERIANN 1 Erigeron annuus 1 FAC- Nt B-Forb ANNUAL FLEABANE 

 

EUPSER 1 Eupatorium serotinum -1 FAC+ Nt P-Forb LATE BONESET 

 

GEUVER 1 Geum vernum 1 FAC- Nt P-Forb SPRING AVENS 

 

GLETRI 2 Gleditsia triacanthos 0 FAC Nt Tree HONEY LOCUST 

 

HELGRO 2 Helianthus grosseserratus -2 FACW- Nt P-Forb SAWTOOTH SUNFLOWER 

 

HORJUB 0 HORDEUM JUBATUM -1 FAC+ Ad P-Grass SQUIRREL-TAIL GRASS 

 

IMPCAP 2 Impatiens capensis -3 FACW Nt A-Forb SPOTTED TOUCH-ME-NOT 

 

JUNINT 3 Juncus interior -1 FAC+ Nt P-Forb INLAND RUSH 

 

LEEORY 3 Leersia oryzoides -5 OBL Nt P-Grass RICE CUT GRASS 

 

LYSLAN 6 Lysimachia lanceolata 0 FAC Nt P-Forb LANCE-LEAVED LOOSESTRIFE 
 

MELOFC 0 MELILOTUS OFFICINALIS 3 FACU Ad B-Forb YELLOW SWEET CLOVER 

 

MORRUB 4 Morus rubra 1 FAC- Nt Tree RED MULBERRY 

 

OENBIB 1 Oenothera biennis 3 FACU Nt B-Forb COMMON EVENING PRIMROSE 

 

PARQUI 2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia 1 FAC- Nt W-Vine VIRGINIA CREEPER 

 

PHAARU 0 PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA -4 FACW+ Ad P-Grass REED CANARY GRASS 

 

PHRAUS 1 Phragmites australis -4 FACW+ Nt P-Grass COMMON REED 

 

POLHYO 4 Polygonum hydropiperoides -5 OBL Nt P-Forb MILD WATER PEPPER 

 

POPDEL 2 Populus deltoides -1 FAC+ Nt Tree EASTERN COTTONWOOD 

 

RHACAT 0 RHAMNUS CATHARTICA 3 FACU Ad Shrub COMMON BUCKTHORN 

 

RUBSTR 6 Rubus strigosus -2 FACW- Nt P-Forb RED RASPBERRY 

 

RUDSUB 5 Rudbeckia subtomentosa -3 FACW Nt P-Forb SWEET BLACK-EYED SUSAN 

 

RUMCRP 0 RUMEX CRISPUS -1 FAC+ Ad P-Forb CURLY DOCK 

 

SAGLAT 4 Sagittaria latifolia -5 OBL Nt P-Forb COMMON ARROWHEAD 

 

SALEXI 1 Salix exigua -5 OBL Nt Shrub SANDBAR WILLOW 

 

SALNIG 3 Salix nigra -5 OBL Nt Tree BLACK WILLOW 

 

SAMCAN 2 Sambucus canadensis 4 FACU- Nt Shrub COMMON ELDER 

 

SAPOFF 0 SAPONARIA OFFICINALIS 3 FACU Ad P-Forb BOUNCING BET 

 

SCIATR 4 Scirpus atrovirens -5 OBL Nt P-Sedge DARK GREEN RUSH 

 

SETGLA 0 SETARIA GLAUCA 0 FAC Ad A-Grass PIGEON GRASS 

 

SOLDUL 0 SOLANUM DULCAMARA 0 FAC Ad W-Vine BITTERSWEET NIGHTSHADE 

 

SOLCAN 1 Solidago canadensis 3 FACU Nt P-Forb CANADA GOLDENROD 

 

SOLGIG 3 Solidago gigantea -3 FACW Nt P-Forb LATE GOLDENROD 

 

SPAPEC 4 Spartina pectinata -4 FACW+ Nt P-Grass PRAIRIE CORD GRASS 

 

THAREV 5 Thalictrum revolutum 0 FAC Nt P-Forb WAXY MEADOW RUE 

 

TRAOHI 3 Tradescantia ohiensis 2 FACU+ Nt P-Forb COMMON SPIDERWORT 

 

TYPLAT 1 Typha latifolia -5 OBL Nt P-Forb BROAD-LEAVED CATTAIL 

 

ULMAME 5 Ulmus americana -2 FACW- Nt Tree AMERICAN ELM 

 

VERBLA 0 VERBASCUM BLATTARIA 4 FACU- Ad B-Forb MOTH MULLEIN 

 

VERHAS 3 Verbena hastata -4 FACW+ Nt P-Forb BLUE VERVAIN 

 

VITRIP 2 Vitis riparia -2 FACW- Nt W-Vine RIVERVBANK GRAPE 

 
Site: Drainage 3 (Indian Creek)

Locale: South Branch

Date: July 06, 2010 1 hours

By: JLB

File: c:\DOCUME~1\jbartlet\Desktop\FQA\studies\Eola_Drainage_3.inv

 FLORISTIC QUALITY DATA Native 26 66.7% Adventive 13 33.3% 

 26 NATIVE SPECIES Tree 6 15.4% Tree 0 0.0% 

 39 Total Species Shrub 2 5.1% Shrub 1 2.6% 

 2.2 NATIVE MEAN C W-Vine 2 5.1% W-Vine 0 0.0% 

 1.4 W/Adventives H-Vine 0 0.0% H-Vine 0 0.0% 

 11.0 NATIVE FQI P-Forb 7 17.9% P-Forb 3 7.7% 

 9.0 W/Adventives B-Forb 1 2.6% B-Forb 4 10.3% 

 -0.7 NATIVE MEAN W A-Forb 7 17.9% A-Forb 2 5.1% 

 0.1 W/Adventives P-Grass 1 2.6% P-Grass 2 5.1% 

 AVG: Faculative (+) A-Grass 0 0.0% A-Grass 1 2.6% 

 P-Sedge 0 0.0% P-Sedge 0 0.0% 

 A-Sedge 0 0.0% A-Sedge 0 0.0% 

 Fern 0 0.0% 

ACRONYM C SCIENTIFIC NAME W WETNESS PHYSIOGNOMY COMMON NAME 

 

ABUTHE 0 ABUTILON THEOPHRASTI 4 FACU- Ad A-Forb BUTTONWEED 

 

ACENEG 1 Acer negundo -2 FACW- Nt Tree BOXELDER 

 

ACESAI 1 Acer saccharinum -3 FACW Nt Tree SILVER MAPLE 

 

AMARUD 0 Amaranthus rudis -3 FACW Nt A-Forb TAMARISK WATERHEMP 

 

AMBART 0 Ambrosia artemisiifolia 3 FACU Nt A-Forb COMMON RAGWEED 

 

AMBTRI 0 Ambrosia trifida -1 FAC+ Nt A-Forb GIANT RAGWEED 

 

APOCAN 2 Apocynum cannabinum 0 FAC Nt P-Forb DOGBANE 

 

ARCMIN 0 ARCTIUM MINUS 5 UPL Ad B-Forb COMMON BURDOCK 

 

CENMAC 0 CENTAUREA MACULOSA 5 UPL Ad B-Forb SPOTTED CENTAUREA 

 

CONCAN 0 Conyza canadensis 1 FAC- Nt A-Forb HORSEWEED 

 

DAUCAR 0 DAUCUS CAROTA 4 FACU- Ad B-Forb QUEEN ANNE'S LACE 

 

EUPSER 1 Eupatorium serotinum -1 FAC+ Nt P-Forb LATE BONESET 

 

FRAPES 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica v. subintegerrima -3 FACW Nt Tree GREEN ASH 

 

GEUVER 1 Geum vernum 1 FAC- Nt P-Forb SPRING AVENS 

 

GLETRI 2 Gleditsia triacanthos 0 FAC Nt Tree HONEY LOCUST 

 

HORJUB 0 HORDEUM JUBATUM -1 FAC+ Ad P-Grass SQUIRREL-TAIL GRASS 

 

IMPCAP 2 Impatiens capensis -3 FACW Nt A-Forb SPOTTED TOUCH-ME-NOT 

 

IPOPAN 2 Ipomoea pandurata 3 FACU Nt P-Forb WILD SWEET POTATO 

 

LEMMIR 3 Lemna minor -5 OBL Nt A-Forb SMALL DUCKWEED 

 

LEOCAR 0 LEONURUS CARDIACA 5 UPL Ad P-Forb MOTHERWORT 

 

LINVUL 0 LINARIA VULGARIS 5 UPL Ad A-Forb BUTTER-AND-EGGS 

 

LYSLAN 6 Lysimachia lanceolata 0 FAC Nt P-Forb LANCE-LEAVED LOOSESTRIFE 

 

MELOFC 0 MELILOTUS OFFICINALIS 3 FACU Ad B-Forb YELLOW SWEET CLOVER 

 

OENBIB 1 Oenothera biennis 3 FACU Nt B-Forb COMMON EVENING PRIMROSE 

 

PHAARU 0 PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA -4 FACW+ Ad P-Grass REED CANARY GRASS 

 

PHRAUS 1 Phragmites australis -4 FACW+ Nt P-Grass COMMON REED 
 

POPDEL 2 Populus deltoides -1 FAC+ Nt Tree EASTERN COTTONWOOD 

 

RHACAT 0 RHAMNUS CATHARTICA 3 FACU Ad Shrub COMMON BUCKTHORN 

 

RUBSTR 6 Rubus strigosus -2 FACW- Nt P-Forb RED RASPBERRY 

 

RUMCRP 0 RUMEX CRISPUS -1 FAC+ Ad P-Forb CURLY DOCK 

 

SALEXI 1 Salix exigua -5 OBL Nt Shrub SANDBAR WILLOW 

 

SAMCAN 2 Sambucus canadensis 4 FACU- Nt Shrub COMMON ELDER 

 

SETGLA 0 SETARIA GLAUCA 0 FAC Ad A-Grass PIGEON GRASS 

 

TOXRAD 1 Toxicodendron radicans 3 FACU Nt W-Vine POISON IVY 

 

TRIREF 9 Trifolium reflexum 5 UPL Nt A-Forb BUFFALO CLOVER 

 

TYPANG 0 TYPHA ANGUSTIFOLIA -5 OBL Ad P-Forb NARROW-LEAVED CATTAIL 

 

ULMAME 5 Ulmus americana -2 FACW- Nt Tree AMERICAN ELM 

 

VERHAS 3 Verbena hastata -4 FACW+ Nt P-Forb BLUE VERVAIN 

 

VITRIP 2 Vitis riparia -2 FACW- Nt W-Vine RIVERVBANK GRAPE 

 
Site: Wetland area 2

Locale: Erosional feature along abandoned track

Date: July 06, 2010 1 hours

By: JLB

File: c:\DOCUME~1\jbartlet\Desktop\FQA\studies\Eola_Wetland_2.inv

 FLORISTIC QUALITY DATA Native 12 60.0% Adventive 8 40.0% 

 12 NATIVE SPECIES Tree 2 10.0% Tree 1 5.0% 

 20 Total Species Shrub 1 5.0% Shrub 1 5.0% 

 1.3 NATIVE MEAN C W-Vine 1 5.0% W-Vine 0 0.0% 

 0.8 W/Adventives H-Vine 0 0.0% H-Vine 0 0.0% 

 4.6 NATIVE FQI P-Forb 3 15.0% P-Forb 1 5.0% 

 3.6 W/Adventives B-Forb 1 5.0% B-Forb 3 15.0% 

 -0.5 NATIVE MEAN W A-Forb 3 15.0% A-Forb 0 0.0% 

 0.6 W/Adventives P-Grass 1 5.0% P-Grass 2 10.0% 

 AVG: Faculative A-Grass 0 0.0% A-Grass 0 0.0% 

 P-Sedge 0 0.0% P-Sedge 0 0.0% 

 A-Sedge 0 0.0% A-Sedge 0 0.0% 

 Fern 0 0.0% 

ACRONYM C SCIENTIFIC NAME W WETNESS PHYSIOGNOMY COMMON NAME 

 

AILALT 0 AILANTHUS ALTISSIMA 5 UPL Ad Tree TREE-OF-HEAVEN 

 

AMARUD 0 Amaranthus rudis -3 FACW Nt A-Forb TAMARISK WATERHEMP 

 

AMBART 0 Ambrosia artemisiifolia 3 FACU Nt A-Forb COMMON RAGWEED 

 

APOCAN 2 Apocynum cannabinum 0 FAC Nt P-Forb DOGBANE 

 

ARCMIN 0 ARCTIUM MINUS 5 UPL Ad B-Forb COMMON BURDOCK 

 

CONCAN 0 Conyza canadensis 1 FAC- Nt A-Forb HORSEWEED 

 

DAUCAR 0 DAUCUS CAROTA 4 FACU- Ad B-Forb QUEEN ANNE'S LACE 

 

EUPSER 1 Eupatorium serotinum -1 FAC+ Nt P-Forb LATE BONESET 

 

FRAPES 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica v. subintegerrima -3 FACW Nt Tree GREEN ASH 

 

HORJUB 0 HORDEUM JUBATUM -1 FAC+ Ad P-Grass SQUIRREL-TAIL GRASS 

 

MELOFC 0 MELILOTUS OFFICINALIS 3 FACU Ad B-Forb YELLOW SWEET CLOVER 

 

MORRUB 4 Morus rubra 1 FAC- Nt Tree RED MULBERRY 

 

OENBIB 1 Oenothera biennis 3 FACU Nt B-Forb COMMON EVENING PRIMROSE 

 

PHAARU 0 PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA -4 FACW+ Ad P-Grass REED CANARY GRASS 

 

PHRAUS 1 Phragmites australis -4 FACW+ Nt P-Grass COMMON REED 

 

RHACAT 0 RHAMNUS CATHARTICA 3 FACU Ad Shrub COMMON BUCKTHORN 

 

SAMCAN 2 Sambucus canadensis 4 FACU- Nt Shrub COMMON ELDER 

 

TRIPRA 0 TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE 2 FACU+ Ad P-Forb RED CLOVER 

 

TYPLAT 1 Typha latifolia -5 OBL Nt P-Forb BROAD-LEAVED CATTAIL 

 

VITRIP 2 Vitis riparia -2 FACW- Nt W-Vine RIVERVBANK GRAPE 

 

Attachments Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Attachment 8 

Wyanet Connection Wetland Delineation Report 

TRANSMITTAL 

 To: Illinois Department of Transportation 

 Bureau of Design and Environment 

 Attn: Barb Traeger 

 From: Illinois Natural History Survey 

 Re: Wetland Survey 

Route and Location 

 Project Title: Wyanet Connection 

 Location: Between BNSF and IAIS railroad lines 

 Sequence No.: 15795 

 IDOT Dist. No.: 3 

 County: Bureau County 

Surveys Conducted By: Brian Wilm, Scott Wiesbrook, 

and Brad Zercher 

University of Illinois 

Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability 

Illinois Natural History Survey 

1816 S. Oak Street 

Champaign, IL 61820 

(217) 244-2176 (Wilm) 

 bwilm@inhs.illinois.edu 

Date Conducted: 26 April, 2010 

Project Summary: 

A wetland survey was conducted for proposed work on the Wyanet Connection, 

between the BNSF and IAIS railroad lines, in Bureau County, Illinois. Summary 

information regarding the wetland determination site is presented in the wetland 

project report. The plant species list is found in Appendix A and the wetland 

determination form is included in Appendix B. Wetland boundaries were recorded 

using a Trimble Global Positioning System. The spatial data has been digitally 

uploaded to the intranet site (http://frostycap.isgs.uiuc.edu/idot_extranet). The 

location of the determination site was overlaid on a digital orthroquad (DOQ) using 

ArcGIS; printouts of this DOQ are included with this report and one copy is 

included in Appendix C.

 

Signed: ____________________________ 

 Dr. Allen Plocher 

 INHS/IDOT Project Principal Investigator and Project Coordinator 

Date: _______5/5/10_________________ 
2

WETLAND PROJECT REPORT 

 To: Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) 

 Bureau of Design and Environment 

 From: Illinois Natural History Survey 

Route and Location 

 Project Title: Wyanet Connection 

 Location: Between BNSF and IAIS railroad lines 

 Sequence No.: 15795 

 IDOT Dist. No.: 3 

 County: Bureau County 

Surveys Conducted By: Brian Wilm, Scott Wiesbrook, 

and Brad Zercher 

 University of Illinois 

 Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability 

 Illinois Natural History Survey 

 1816 S. Oak Street 

 Champaign, IL 61820 

 (217) 244-2176 (Wilm) 

 bwilm@inhs.illinois.edu 

Date Conducted: 26 April, 2010 

 

Introduction and Project Summary: 

 The following sources were examined while surveying the project corridor to 

determine wetland locations and boundaries: United States Geological Survey 

topographic maps and National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps (Wyanet 7.5 

minute quadrangles); Soil Survey of Bureau County, Illinois (Zwicker 1992); 

National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Illinois (Reed 1988); the 

1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 

1987); Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation 

Manual: Midwest Region (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2008); and the NRCS, 

USDA, Web Soil Survey. These materials were used during on-site evaluation of 

vegetation, soils, and hydrology. 

 All potential wetlands within the specified study area were examined. One routine 

on-site wetland determination was performed; the site was determined to be a 

wetland. 

 Wetland boundaries were recorded using a Trimble Global Positioning System. 

The spatial data has been digitally uploaded to the intranet site 

(http://frostycap.isgs.uiuc.edu/idot_extranet). The location of the determination site 
3

was overlaid on a digital orthroquad (DOQ) using ArcGIS 9.x software (ESRI 

2002). Printouts of this DOQ are included with this report. 

 The Floristic Quality Index (FQI) is used to assess the ecological integrity of 

communities (Swink and Wilhelm 1994, Taft et al. 1997). This index provides a 

measure for the quality or environmental integrity of each individual community. 

The FQI is calculated as follows: 

FQI = R/ツN 

 where R represents the sum of the numerical ratings for all species recorded at the 

site and N represents the total number of recorded species. Numerical ratings for 

each species are shown in the species list for each community. Plants not identified 

to species level are not given a numerical rating. Plants not native to Illinois are 

also not scored. The mean Coefficient of Conservatism (mean C), defined as the 

sum of the numerical ratings divided by the total number of native Illinois species 

(R/N), was also determined. Although generalizations are problematic, for 

interpretive purposes it can be said that FQI values of ten or less for individual sites 

indicate low natural quality. Sites with FQI values of twenty or more (mean C>3.0) 

possess some evidence of native character and may be considered environmental 

assets. 

Wetland Site Summary: 

Site 1: This pond (with its associated wooded fringe) borders both the north and 

south sides of the BNSF railroad line at the northeasternmost part of the project 

area. Dominant hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology are all 

present; therefore, the site is a wetland. The FQI for the site is 11.9 and the mean 

coefficient of conservatism is 2.3; these values are indicative of fair floristic 

quality. The site is identified in the National Wetlands Inventory as 

semipermanently flooded, emergent, palustrine wetland (PEMF). This wetland 

provides wildlife habitat for waterfowl and wading birds, while also providing 

significant storage of surface water runoff. The wetland covers 0.224 ha (0.555 

acres) within the project corridor, while totaling 1.791 ha (4.428 acres) overall. 

Stream Characterization and Watershed Classification 

Pond Creek at the project area was substantially entrenched with moderately to 

steeply sloping stream banks; stream banks were moderately well vegetated. 

Channel width was about 12 m (40 ft); water was clear with a slight brownish tint. 

Flow was moderate, with a depth estimated to be less than 1 m (3.3 ft). Substrate 

was primarily silt. Woody debris was common. 

 The project area occurs within the Illinois River – Ottawa to East Peoria watershed 

(USGS Hydrologic Unit Code 7130001). 
4

Literature Cited 

Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. 

 Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, 

 Vicksburg, MS. 207 pp. 

ESRI. 2002. ArcGIS 9.x. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, 

CA, USA. 

Reed, P. B., Jr. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Illinois. 

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory. NERC-88/18.13. 

117 pp. 

Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States 

Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Available online at 

http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/ [Accessed April 15 - May 5, 2010]. 

Swink, F. and G. Wilhelm. 1994. Plants of the Chicago Region. 4th Ed. Indiana 

Academy of Sciences. 900 pp. 

Taft, J. B., G. S. Wilhelm, D. M. Ladd, and L. A. Masters. 1997. Floristic quality 

assessment for vegetation in Illinois - a method for assessing vegetation integrity. 

Erigenia 15:3-95. 

U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2008. Interim regional supplement to the Corps of 

Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region, eds. J. S. Wakely, R. 

W. Lichvar, and C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-08-27. U. S. Army Engineer 

Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS. 

Zwicker, S. E. 1992. Soil survery of Bureau County, Illinois. United States 

Department of Agriculture – Soil Conservation Service, in cooperation with the 

Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station. Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station 

Soil Report No. 139. 302 pp. + maps. 
5

Appendix A. Plant Species List 

6

Site 1 – Pond and Associated Wooded Fringe 

DOMINANT PLANT SPECIES

Scientific name Common name Stratum Wetland indicator Coefficient of 

Status Conservatism 

Lemna minor common duckweed herb OBL 3 

Phalaris arundinacea reed canary grass herb FACW+ * 

Salix nigra black willow tree, sapling OBL 3 

Scirpus fluviatilis river bulrush herb OBL 3 

*Species not native to Illinois 

ALL PLANT SPECIES

Scientific name Common name Stratum Wetland indicator Coefficient of 

Status Conservatism 

Acer negundo box elder shrub FACW- 1

Campanula americana American bellflower herb FAC 4

Carex sp. sedge herb ----- -- 

Chaerophyllum procumbens wild chervil herb FAC+ 1

Cornus drummondii rough-leaved dogwood shrub FAC 2 

Cryptotaenia canadensis honewort herb FAC 1 

Ellisia nyctelea Aunt Lucy herb FAC+ 1 

Galium aparine annual bedstraw herb FACU 0 

Impatiens capensis jewelweed herb FACW 2 

Iris shrevei southern blue flag herb OBL 5 

Lemna minor common duckweed herb OBL 3 

Lonicera maackii Amur honeysuckle shrub UPL * 

Morus alba white mulberry tree, sapling FAC * 

Parthenocissus quinquefolia Virginia creeper vine, herb FAC- 2 

Phalaris arundinacea reed canary grass herb FACW+ * 

Plantago rugelii red-stalked plantain herb FAC 0 

Polygonum amphibium water smartweed herb OBL 3 

Polygonum scandens climbing buckwheat herb FAC 2 

Prunus serotina wild black cherry shrub FACU 1 

Quercus macrocarpa bur oak tree, sapling, shrub FAC- 5 

Ranunculus abortivus little-leaf buttercup herb FACW- 1 

Ranunculus sceleratus cursed crowfoot herb OBL 3 

Rorippa islandica marsh yellow cress herb OBL 4 

Salix nigra black willow tree, sapling, shrub OBL 3 

Scirpus fluviatilis river bulrush herb OBL 3 

Sicyos angulatus bur cucumber herb FACW- 3 

Solidago gigantea late goldenrod herb FACW 3 

Toxicodendron radicans poison ivy vine, herb FAC+ 1 

Ulmus americana American elm tree, sapling, shrub FACW- 5 

Viburnum opulus European high-bush cranberry shrub UPL * 

Viola pratincola common blue violet herb FAC 1 

Vitis riparia riverbank grape vine, herb FACW- 2 

*Species not native to Illinois FQI = R/ツN = 62/ツ27 = 11.9 

 mean C = R/N = 62/27 = 2.3

7

Appendix B. Wetland Delineation Forms 

US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region – Interim Version 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Midwest Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): 

Slope (%): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: 

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

VEGETATION – Use scientific names of plants.

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 Dominance Test is >50% 

 Prevalence Index is 3.01

 Morphological Adaptations1

 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1

 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

 = Total Cover 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

 = Total Cover 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

 = Total Cover 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1. 

2. 

 = Total Cover 

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

8

 Wyanet Connection Bureau 4/26/10

 Illinois Department of Transportation - District 3 Illinois 1

 Wilm, Wiesbrook, Zercher SE/4, NW/4, Section 20, T. 16 N., R. 8 E.

Excavated depression Concave

< 1%

NRCS mapped as Water and Muscatune silt loam; Revised to Sable silty clay loam, overwash PEMF

 No No No

 No No No

 Salix nigra yes OBL 5

 5

 100%

 Salix nigra yes OBL

 Phalaris arundinacea

 Scirpus fluviatilis

 yes

 yes

 yes

 OBL

 FACW+

 OBL

x

 Lemna minor

Dominant hydrophytic vegetation is present throughout the entire site.
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region – Interim Version 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) 

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) 

 Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 

 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: 

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

 Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9) 

 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

9

0-12+ 10YR 3/1 85 7.5YR 4/4 15 C M, PL CL Redox include soft masses in matrix.

This site is the pond and associated fringe which is inundated or saturated for significant duration 

during the growing season.

<66

At surface

At surface

This excavated depression and its associated fringe appear to be saturated or inundated to a depth 

less than 2 m for a significant duration during the growing season.

 1
10

Appendix C. Project Area and Wetland Delineation Figure 

	


  







 	










  

 


       

Attachments Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Attachment 9 

Agency Comment Letters 







United States Department of the Interior 

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 

Chicago Ecological Services Field Office 

1250 South Grove Avenue, Suite lO3 

Barrington, Illinois 600 lO 

Phone: (847) 381-2253 Fax: (847) 381-2285 

IN REPLY REFER TO: 

FWSIAES-CIFO/2009-FA-0515 

October 9, 2009 

George Weber 

Bureau of Railroads Bureau Chief 

Illinois Department of Transportation 

100 W. Randolph 

Suite 6-600 

Chicago, Illinois 60601 

Dear Mr. Weber: 

This responds to your request for comments on the Tier 1 Service Level Environmental 

Assessment (EA) for the Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service project. Illinois 

Department ofTransportation and Iowa Department of Transportation, in conjunction with the 

Federal Railroad Administration are evaluating the reestablishment ofpassenger rail service 

between the aforementioned cities. The Tier 1 Service Level EA addresses the service level 

issues that would be part ofthe initial operations and the proposed alternatives. The Tier 2 

Project Level analyses would address specific project level activities. We provide comments as 

they relate to fish and wildlife resources that may be affected by construction and operation of 

the proposed project. 

We reviewed the information provided in your Tier 1 Service Level EA. We checked our 

records for the presence offederally listed species, Service trust resources, and other fish and 

wildlife resources that may be affected by the proposed project. Based on our review we offer 

the following comments that should be addressed in the Tier 2 Project Level EA. 

Alternatives 

The Tier 1 EA indicates that for both alternatives (Route A and B), track rehabilitation would 

occur within the existing railroad grade. However, some ditching, minor bridge work and 

culvert work, and other track related upgrades would be required outside ofthe existing railroad 

grade. The Tier 2 EA should identify the locations ofthese track upgrades and assess possible 

impacts to natural resources. 
Mr. George Weber 2 

Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 

Noise and Vibration 

The Tier 2 EA should evaluate whether wildlife, particularly migratory birds, would be affected 

by noise and vibration from the possible increase in frequency and speed oftrains for both 

alternati ves. 

Parks and Federally or State-listed Natural Areas 

The Tier 2 EA should describe and identify all natural areas providing habitat for wildlife 

resources that abut the right-of-way ofthe proposed alternatives. These natural areas would 

include county forest preserves which provide valuable habitat for fish and wildlife resources. A 

figure should be provided in the Tier 2 EA that shows all natural areas along the proposed 

alternatives. Figure 3.11.1 only shows state wildlife management areas and neglects to show 

county forest preserves or other natural areas. 

Threatened and Endangered Species 

This section notes that specific construction impacts to listed and candidate species would be 

further evaluated in the Tier 2 EA. The Tier 2 EA should include a list ofthe state listed species 

that are present in aforementioned natural areas as some ofthose species (i.e., migratory birds) 

are also Service trust resources. 

Indirect and Cumulative Impacts 

The Tier 2 EA should fully disclose all indirect and cumulative impacts to natural resources. 

The Tier 1 EA only discusses anticipated beneficial impacts from the two alternatives. Indirect 

and cumulative impacts such as those that could occur to streams, wetlands, water quality, etc. as 

a result of proposed track upgrades should be indentified as well. 

These comments only address activities within the Chicago Illinois Field Office coverage area, 

which ends at the Kane-Kendall County border for Alternative A and at the Will-Kendall County 

border for Alternative B. The Service's Rock Island Field Office should be contacted for 

comments outside of our coverage area. 

This letter provides comment under the authority of, and in accordance with, the provisions of 

the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (83 Stat. 852 as amended P.L. 91-190,42 U.S.C. 

4321 et seq.), the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 

et seq.) and the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (87 Stat. 884. as amended; 16 

U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). 
Mr. George Weber 3 

If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Shawn Cirton at 847/381-2253, ext. 19. 

Sincerely, 

fi1AA(:r 

v/ 

Janice C. Engle 

Acting Field Supervisor 

cc: RIFO, Woeber 

USEP A, Westlake 

USCOE, Chernich 

HDR, Morton 





From: Rogers, Michael D. 

Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:16 AM 

To: Zyznieuski, Walter G 

Subject: FW: General Conformity Applicability Levels 

Walt, 

Below is a link from Michael Leslie of Region V to what I think is the most recent final rule (July 17, 2006, 

71 FR 40420) dealing with general conformity de minimis thresholds. It includes that same weird 

ノ;ミェ┌;ェW デエ;デ SラWゲミげデ ゲヮWIキaキI;ノノ┞ ;SSヴWゲゲ マラSWヴ;デW ;ミS マ;ヴェキミ;ノ ラ┣ラミW NAAゲが H┌デ テ┌ゲデ さOデエWヴ ;ヴW;ゲ 

キミゲキSW ふラ┌デゲキSWぶ ;ミ ラ┣ラミW デヴ;ミゲヮラヴデ ヴWェキラミくざ The threshold for such areas outside an ozone transport 

region is 100 tpy for both VOC and NOx. 

For Illinois PM2.5 nonattainment areas the threshold is also 100 tpy and should be assessed for direct 

PM2.5, SO2, and NOx emissions. 

Let me know if you have any questions. 

Mike 

************************************* 

Mike Rogers 

Illinois EPA, Bureau of Air 

1021 North Grand Avenue East 

Springfield, IL 62794-9276 

 

phone: 217 524-4408 

fax: 217 557-2559 

e-mail: michael.rogers@illinois.gov

 
From: Leslie.Michael@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Leslie.Michael@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 7:29 AM 

To: Rogers, Michael D. 

Subject: General Conformity Applicability Levels 

http://www.epa.gov/air/genconform/documents/Jul06/EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0491-0026.pdf 

----------------------------------------------------

Michael Leslie, P.E. 

USEPA - Region 5 (AR-18J) 

77 W. Jackson Blvd. 

Chicago, IL 60604 

Phone: (312) 353-6680 

Fax: (312) 408-2266 

----------------------------------------------------






!"#$%&'()&*'('

+,#-&.#,/0/#

1%%$23$4&5/",#67/26&38&.#,24"3#6,6$32&9&:;

*<''&=>&5$#?4/2&@?AB)&C337&<<'

5/,#&!""%$D,26E

!"#$%&'()'$*$+,-./$.011".2301$4"25""1$6789$:$;<;8

$$$$$$$=,0>".2$7?@4",ABC#$&DD())E$$

$$$$$$$F0?12G#$6?,"-?$

="#$208$/%F)&1G&H*IHJ&

.K$4& %/66/#& $4& $2& #/8/#/2D/& 63& 6K/& "#3L/D6& B3M& #/D/26%B& 4M-7$66/F& 83#& D324M%6,6$32>& .K/& 2,6M#,%& #/43M#D/& #/N$/A&

"#3N$F/F& -B& OD3:!.& $F/26$8$/F& "#36/D6/F& #/43M#D/4& 6K,6& 7,B& -/& $2& 6K/& N$D$2$6B& 38& 6K/& "#3"34/F& ,D6$32>& .K/&

5/",#67/26& K,4& /N,%M,6/F& 6K$4& $283#7,6$32& ,2F& D32D%MF/F& 6K,6& ,FN/#4/& /88/D64& ,#/& M2%$?/%B>& .K/#/83#/)&

D324M%6,6$32&M2F/#&(I&1%%>&!F7>&:3F/&@,#6&('IP&$4&6/#7$2,6/F>

.K$4& D324M%6,6$32& $4& N,%$F& 83#& 6A3& B/,#4& M2%/44& 2/A& $283#7,6$32& -/D37/4& ,N,$%,-%/& 6K,6& A,4& 236& "#/N$3M4%B&

D324$F/#/FQ& 6K/& "#3"34/F& ,D6$32& $4& 73F$8$/FQ& 3#& ,FF$6$32,%& 4"/D$/4)& /44/26$,%& K,-$6,6)& 3#& R,6M#,%& !#/,4& ,#/&

$F/26$8$/F&$2&6K/& N$D$2$6B>& 18&6K/& "#3L/D6& K,4& 236& -//2&$7"%/7/26/F&A$6K$2&6A3& B/,#4& 38&6K/& F,6/& 38&6K$4&%/66/#)& 3#&

,2B&38&6K/&,-3N/&%$46/F&D32F$6$324&F/N/%3")&,&2/A&D324M%6,6$32&$4&2/D/44,#B>

@%/,4/&D326,D6&7/&$8&B3M&K,N/&SM/46$324&#/0,#F$20&6K$4&#/N$/A>

.K/&2,6M#,%& #/43M#D/& #/N$/A& #/8%/D64&6K/&$283#7,6$32&/T$46$20&$2&6K/& 1%%$23$4&R,6M#,%&U/#$6,0/&5,6,-,4/&,6&6K/&6$7/&

38& 6K/& "#3L/D6& 4M-7$66,%)& ,2F& 4K3M%F& 236& -/& #/0,#F/F& ,4& ,& 8$2,%& 46,6/7/26& 32& 6K/& 4$6/& -/$20& D324$F/#/F)& 23#&

4K3M%F& $6& -/& ,& 4M-46$6M6/& 83#& F/6,$%/F& 4$6/& 4M#N/B4& 3#& 8$/%F& 4M#N/B4& #/SM$#/F& 83#& /2N$#327/26,%& ,44/447/264>& 18&

,FF$6$32,%& "#36/D6/F& #/43M#D/4& ,#/& /2D3M26/#/F& FM#$20& 6K/& "#3L/D6V4& $7"%/7/26,6$32)& B3M& 7M46& D37"%B& A$6K& 6K/&

,""%$D,-%/& 46,6M6/4& ,2F& #/0M%,6$324>& !%43)& 236/& 6K,6& 6/#7$2,6$32& F3/4& 236& $7"%B& 15RCW4& ,M6K3#$X,6$32& 3#&

/2F3#4/7/26&38&6K/&"#3"34/F&,D6$32>

=6/N/&U,7/#

5$N$4$32&38&OD34B46/74&,2F&O2N$#327/26

*(I9IYP9PP''

!"#$%&'()$("&*+*,&'(-$'("&*+*,-.,&(/-/&"





Attachments Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Attachment 10 

Comments and Responses 

1

 

EA Comments

Aleksy, Donald - City of LaSalle-Office of Economic Development Comment ID: 13

Address: 745 2nd St Date: 9 /24/2009

LaSalle, IL 61301 Comment Email

Comment: The City of LaSalle would fully support Amtrak Rail Service through our city. It would be a benefit for 

economic development for our downtown.

Topic(s): Support B Response: Comment noted

Aleksy, Donald - City of LaSalle-Office of Economic Development Comment ID: 17

Address: 745 2nd St Date: 9 /22/2009

LaSalle, IL 61301 Comment Letter

Comment: I am writing in response to the Illinois Department of Transportation's notification that a passenger 

rail line is being considered between Chicago and Iowa City. We are pleased to hear of these 

discussions. Specifically that the City of LaSalle is being considered under Alternative "B". This 

would be a boost to our economic development efforts here in LaSalle. Amtrak Service with a stop in

 LaSalle would be beneficial for many reasons. The first is that it will support our tourism efforts with 

the Lock 16 Project of the Illinois Heritage Corridor with our new Canal Boat. In addition, our citizens 

would have easy access to Chicago not currently available. They now have to travel 20 miles north to

 Mendota to access this service. We have many veterans who require transportation to the Iowa City 

Veteran's Hospital. This would be a great benefit to our Veteran's Home in supplying transportation 

service. Our area is also a tourism hub with proximity to many State Parks and other historical sites in

 the area. I believe the combination of needs for veteran transportation, tourism attractions and the 

need of our citizen's to have direct access to Chicago makes the City of LaSalle a strong candidate 

to host a stop along the Alternative "B" Plan. I look forward to speaking with [you] about this project. If

 you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Topic(s): Support B Response: Comment noted

Anderson, Brenda Comment ID: 68

Address: 21W551 North Ave Date: 10/5 /2009

Lombard, IL 60148 Comment Website

Comment: My daughter and I live near Chicago, and she is considering enrollment at Iowa State University. We 

are concerned about the lack of options available for public transportation between Chicago and 

various cities in Iowa. Passenger rail service between Chicago and Iowa City would be a great start! 

More students would be encouraged to come to Iowa if rail service were available.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Anonymous, Comment ID: 20

Address: Date: 9 /28/2009

Comment Website

Comment: There already is a train running from Chicago through Mendota and to Princeton. If it went the 

southern route it give access to Joliet, Morris and LaSalle. Both connect at Wyanet.

Topic(s): Support B Response: Comment noted

Bachman, Jason Comment ID: 9

Address: Date: 9 /23/2009

Lake Zurich, IL Comment Website

Comment: How much traffic today runs between the cities on the line? What data do we have about this?
2

 

Topic(s):Transportation Response: Pages 3-4 and 3-5 of the environmental assessment provide 

information on current train traffic on the rail lines proposed to 

be used for the passenger rail service.

Bacon, Elizabeth - Experlex, LLC Comment ID: 62

Address: 2333 Dunmore Dr Date: 10/4 /2009

Darien, IL 60561 Comment Website

Comment: Great idea!!!

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Bacon, Robert Comment ID: 63

Address: 8546 Thistlewood Ct Date: 10/4 /2009

Darien, IL 60561 Comment Website

Comment: This proposed service would be a great addition to rail options in the midwest. It makes sense 

environmentally, logistically and, very likely, financially. To Connect Chicago with efficient passenger 

rail service into the central midwest (and beyond) would be a part of the rebirth of a vital and 

affordable transportation option that will serve tens of thousands of people for years to come. Let's get on 

with it!

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Beat, Robert Comment ID: 26

Address: 3726 Vogel Ct Date: 9 /29/2009

Bettendorf, IA 52722 Comment Website

Comment: I think the choice of any route will result in positive benefits for rail travel. It would be nice if it could 

ultimately interface with national AMTRAK routes without having to go to Chicago. I think 

consideration should be given to encouraging bus companies to offer connecting service between 

medium-sized communities and selected AMTRAK rail stations to extend the reach of rail travel 

throughout the region. 

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted. As discussed on page 2-1 in the EA, bus 

service would be provided as part of the ultimate service level.

Belz, Nat Comment ID: 29

Address: 15 Westchester Dr Date: 9 /29/2009

Asheville, NC 28803 Comment Website

Comment: Go for it! I'll use it whenever I come home!

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Biermann, John Comment ID: 52

Address: 1697 33rd Ave Ct Date: 9 /29/2009

East Moline, IL 61244 Comment Meeting Comment Form

Comment: I fully support Amtrak's' proposed route through the Quad Cities. My wife and I have traveled Amtrak 

about 10,000 miles over the past 7 years (to Washington DC, Los Angeles, CA; Whitefish, MT). We 

normally board in Galesburg, IL, to connect in Chicago. The connection in the Quad Cities would be 

far more convenient for us. We have trips planned in 2010 to Montana and San Francisco, CA, both 

by rail. In addition to long-distance connections, the commuter traffic and usage would greatly benefit

from a Quad Cities connection alleviating the problems of battling Chicago traffic/parking and saving fuel.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Bloom, Andrea - The Earlville Post Comment ID: 35

Address: PO Box 487 Date: 9 /30/2009

Earlville, IL 60518 Comment Email

Comment: Thank you for this information. As the proposed northern route passes through the two communities 

covered by our newspaper, Earlville and Leland, Ill.(between Plano and Mendota), we are wondering:
3

 Would the passenger trains stop here, to give people the benefit of convenient transportation to 

Chicago and elsewhere? Or would they just increase the already frequent and painfully loud rail 

traffic passing through our business and residential neighborhoods night and day?

Topic(s): Noise Response: Existing stations at Plano and Mendota would continue to 

provide passenger rail service; a station is not planned for 

Earlville. As discussed in the EA (pages 3-32, 3-33, and sheets

 18, 19, and 20 for the Route A Alternative in Appendix C), 

noise levels would minimally increase in Leland and Earlville.

Borgstrom, Robert Comment ID: 84

Address: 2596 Creekside Date: 10/9 /2009

Morris, IL 60450 Comment Website

Comment: The CSXT Rail line moves freight now through many towns one being Morris. The rail traffic has 

increased over the years and will continue to do so with the new Seneca intermodal being 

developed. We can not control the time of the rail traffic so at two in the morning when the 

conductors love to sound the horn we are at their mercy. With so many houses on the rail line I think 

it would be a tremendous mistake to open the freight rail line for passengers. If this project goes 

through, how many more our down the line? I can't state this opinion strong enough. Please keep me

updated on the progress of this project. Thank you for this opportunity to voice the opinion of many 

Morris residents.

Topic(s): Opposition to B Response: As discussed in the EA (pages 3-34, 3-35, and sheets 17 and 

18 for the Route B Alternative in Appendix C), noise levels 

would minimally increase in Morris.

Borgstrom, Chris Comment ID: 85

Address: 416 Liberty St Date: 10/9 /2009

Morris, IL 60450 Comment Website

Comment: I am an individual living in Morris, Illinois, which is located along this proposed corridor. I understand 

that you are studying the human, natural, and economic impacts of expanding the use of rail along 

this corridor. I oppose any expansion of rail use. Our human environment already has too much 

pollution--from the exhaust of these engines and noise--the disruption of peaceful neighborhoods, 

and the possible disruption of the natural environments along the way. The small chance of having a 

positive economic impact would be overshadowed by the greater cost to the human and natural 

environments.

Topic(s): Opposition to B Response: As discussed on pages 3-50 and 3-51 in the EA, emissions of 

particulate matter and nitrogen oxides would minimally increase.

 Emissions of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons would 

decrease when considering train emissions and reductions in 

emissions from vehicles and planes. As discussed in the EA 

(pages 3-34, 3-35, and sheets 17 and 18 for the Route B 

Alternative in Appendix C), noise levels would minimally 

increase in Morris. Pages 3-15 through 3-17 of the EA discuss 

the economic impacts of the proposed passenger rail service.

Breisch, David Comment ID: 51

Address: 3046 4th St, Unit 8 Date: 9 /29/2009

Moline, IL 61265 Comment Meeting Comment Form

Comment: I am a strong supporter of increased passenger rail service in the country, as well as between 

Chicago and the Quad Cities/Iowa City. As a resident of the Quad Cities, I currently drive to the 

Chicagoland area about once a month. I look forward to the day that I can take the train instead of 

drive. Also, it would be a great asset to our region and would provide fantastic economic and 

environmental benefits.

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted
4

Breitwieser, Susan Comment ID: 94

Address: 428 Armstrong St Date: 10/14/2009

Morris, IL 60450 Comment Email

Comment: Please do not allow this project to go any further...My back yard backs up to freight railway tracks. 

The freight traffic has increased so much. It used to be that only a couple trains late at night went 

thru. Now there are many. These conductors do not care either that they are waking everyone in the 

neighborhood up. The old conductors used to give quick blows of their whistles before the 

intersection, now they begin before the intersection and lay on the horn thru the next intersection. I 

can not tell you the last night that I was able to get the required eight hours of sleep. I work day shift, 

and every day I am so tired. Now I see that there are folks wanting to have commuter trains use 

those tracks from Chicago to Iowa City. I personally do not want this to happen. There are MANY 

children in my neighborhood. I would hate to see anyone get hurt by those fast passenger trains. Not

 to mention the noise. As I mentioned earlier, the train traffic has already increased a lot. It is very 

loud as it is. I have planted many evergreen trees both at the edge of my property near the tracks as

 well as near the back of my house trying to diffuse some of the noise. Believe me it does not work! 

I am asking that everyone who is involved in this project please, please think of the little people. I am

 still fortunate enough to have a job, so I am able to pay for my mortgage. I can not afford to move. 

Even if I could, I am sure that with increased train traffic the value of my property will go down 

drastically! I do not see this helping our economy in any way what so ever. Please, please share my

 concerns with everyone involved. I hope to get a reply to my message.

Topic(s): Opposition to B Response: As discussed in the EA (pages 3-34, 3-35, and sheets 17 and 

18 for the Route B Alternative in Appendix C), noise levels 

would minimally increase in Morris. Pages 3-26 and 3-27 of the 

EA discuss public safety; grade crossing warnings would be 

upgraded and highway congestion would decrease, improving 

safety.

Buczek, Mary - Iowa Association of Railroad Passengers Comment ID: 100

Address: 1422 W 9th St Date: 10/15/2009

Davenport, IA 52804 Comment Website

Comment: After viewing the environmental study and previously the Amtrak study, I want to express my support 

of passenger rail service between Chicago and Iowa City. I support the route using the BNSF to 

Wyanet, Illinois then connecting to the Iowa Interstate to the Quad Cities and Iowa City. 

Environmentally the train will help conserve oil usage by using less fuel then automobiles driving 

between the cities. I have discussed passenger train service with several people. Almost all are 

supportive of having passenger train service and would use it as an alternative mode of travel.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Cechner, Thomas Comment ID: 71

Address: 216 North Ave Date: 10/6 /2009

Lockport, IL 60441 Comment Website

Comment: The southern route along the Illinois river is better. The route is more scenic and under served. This 

will bring more people into the system. There are state parks along the way and major towns 

Minooka, Morris, Marseilles, Ottawa, La Salle and Peru.

Topic(s): Support B Response: Comment noted

Collette, Rondi Comment ID: 58

Address: 215 Waubansee Date: 10/1 /2009

Minooka, IL 60447 Comment Website

Comment: Since we live close to the Plan B route, we would prefer that alternative. That way we could actually 

use what our tax dollars are paying for, for a change.

Topic(s): Support B Response: Comment noted
5

Costigan, Michael Comment ID: 89

Address: 22949 S Frances Way Date: 10/9 /2009

Channahon, IL 60410 Comment Website

Comment: I believe this to be a sound proposal that offers several benefits for the residents of the region. We 

sorely need transportation alternatives to flying and the use of highways. Building more highways and

 airports/runways is no longer the most viable or economically feasible solution. We need 

diversification in our transportation choices, and choices that are economical and practical. This 

proposed rail service would help to ease severely crowded highways and offer a viable alternative to 

flying. Both of the proposed routes of "A" and "B" from Iowa City to Chicago have their advantages. 

Please do one. I travel to both the Quad Cities and Iowa City with some frequency. Rail service 

would be far more attractive than driving I-80. It would offer a safe and relaxing mode of 

transportation. One could even work and study while traveling.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Curry, Marie Comment ID: 83

Address: Date: 10/8 /2009

Lockport, IL 60441 Comment Info Line

Comment: We're in desperate need of some transportation into Iowa. I have to go into Iowa...there's no 

form...other than I have to go into Chicago and I still can't get into the cities I want in Iowa. So I'm 

certainly looking forward to having some transportation into Iowa City.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Dalton, Larry Comment ID: 49

Address: 2410 Warren St Date: 9 /29/2009

Davenport, IA 52804 Comment Meeting Comment Form

Comment: Would like to see the northern route. It would be an economic boost to the Quad Cities. It would be 

better for the environment. With the colleges we have from Iowa City to Chicago, would be a real 

need for train transportation. It would be good for a commuter train. It would benefit both Iowa and 

Illinois.

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted

Dessner, Pat - Workplace Solutions Comment ID: 21

Address: 12036 County Road X17 Date: 9 /28/2009

Columbus Junction, IA 52738 Comment Website

Comment: This would be a great service.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Diehl, Tracy - Village of Annawan Comment ID: 92

Address: 203 W Front, PO Box 446 Date: 10/13/2009

Annawan, IL 61234 Comment Letter

Comment: I am writing in support of the State of Iowa and State of Illinois ARRA application for passenger rail 

service between Chicago, Quad Cities and Iowa City. While the train would not be stopping in 

Annawan specifically, we do feel the train stopping in the area would make a positive impact all 

surrounding communities here in Henry County. It would potentially bring more people to the area 

who would in turn shop at our stores and stay at our hotels. The other plus for the train to stop in the 

area is, while we can get on the train in Princeton or Kewanee, it would give those closer to Geneseo

 a near by location to use this transportation. Lastly as we all have celebrations in our community and 

this would give those traveling to said events a different outlet for transportation. Again, this will then 

help with commerce in our locations. Not to mention adding to attendance to our community festivals.

 If I can be or any further assistance, please don’t hesitate to contact me here in Annawan. Best of 

luck with your decision! Thank you for your time and consideration.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted
6

Dumelle, Christopher Comment ID: 6

Address: 605 N Grove Ave Date: 9 /23/2009

Oak Park, IL 60302 Comment Website

Comment: I believe the Northern Route would run more closely through the center of the Chicago area's 

population, allowing it to serve more riders more easily than the Southern Route.

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted

Eberhardt, Patrick - City of Geneseo Comment ID: 54

Address: 115 S Oakwood Ave Date: 9 /29/2009

Geneseo, IL 61254 Comment Letter

Comment: I am writing this letter to express support for an application being submitted by the Iowa department 

of Transportation (DOT) under competitive grant funding made available through the American 

Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The Illinois DOT is collaborating with the Iowa DOT to 

seek High Speed Rail corridors and Intercity Passenger Rail Service (HSIPR) funding through a 

Track 2 application. These funds would support continued environmental impact analysis, track 

infrastructure construction and improvements, layover facility construction and station improvements 

to implement service between Chicago and Iowa City, Iowa. Approval of this application would allow 

Illinois to move forward with its mission of providing fast, frequent and reliable train service to as 

many Illinois communities as possible. The implementation of this project would help create jobs, 

improve our nation's transportation infrastructure and assist in providing transportation alternatives to 

the citizens of northwestern Illinois. The City of Geneseo City Council recently passed a resolution in

 support of a passenger rail route from Chicago to the Quad Cities. The City owns property adjacent 

to the Iowa Interstate Railroad tracks in the downtown corridor, which is suitable for development as 

a future station site. This property is adjacent to the 1900-era depot building, and could also be 

utilized as parking if the former depot building were deemed appropriate for restoration as a modern 

station facility. The community is supportive of having a passenger rail station, and the City's 1997 

comprehensive Plan (updated 2005) includes development of the aforementioned site as a 

passenger rail station. This project is strongly supported by those in our community and so we 

respectfully encourage you to take full consideration of this application.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted. As noted on page 2-5 in the EA, the location 

of the proposed Geneseo station will be determined and 

documented in a Tier 2 project-level NEPA document.

Eschbach, Robert - City of Ottawa Comment ID: 98

Address: Date: 10/15/2009

Comment Email

Comment: As members of the Illinois Valley Corridor Steering Committee, we are in favor of the Route B 

Alternative as described in the Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service Tier 1 Service 

Level Environment Assessment. We are not aware at this time if those responsible for this 

aforementioned document has any knowledge of a feasibility study that has already been performed,

 as well as what is proposed in the near future for a 60 mile section of the Route B Alternative. In 

August of 2003 an Illinois Valley Commuter Rail Feasibility Study was complete for the 60-mile 

corridor from Joliet to LaSalle/Peru. This study concluded that the existing CSX rail line is physically, 

operationally, and financially feasible for commuter rail operations. For more in depth information on 

this study, please se the following website: www.cityof Ottawa.org. Since that time this committee 

had been working to secure funding for the next phase of studies. We are happy to report that the 

funds have been secured and we are anxiously waiting to start a comprehensive transportation 

corridor study. The Chicago to Iowa study states that Route A already has passenger rail through 

almost half of its proposed route. Therefore, Route B would make a better alternative by providing 

service to area that are not currently being served by commuter rail. This commuter rail service, thus 

reducing vehicular traffic on the already congested highways. It would seem to be more financially 

feasible to examine the existing Phase I Feasibility Study and wait for the results of the planned 

Phase II study as both of these are either paid for or fully funded. We believe that this has the 

potential to save a tremendous amount of revenue, while answering the questions regarding the 

anticipated cost estimates associated with proposed track improvements, grade crossings and new 
7

signals. Should you have any questions or comments please contact Tami Huftel, City Planner for 

the city of Ottawa at (815) 433-0161 ext. 40. (Also signed by Mayor Richard Kopczick, Mayor David 

Spicer, Mayor Scott Harl, Mayor Pro Tem Robert Davis and Mayor Fred Esmond)

Topic(s): Support B Response: Thank you for your comment in support of the Chicago to Iowa 

City Intercity Passenger Rail Service. We have reviewed the 

August 2003 Illinois Valley Commuter Rail Feasibility Study. 

The EA for the Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail 

Service considered alternatives for intercity passenger rail. 

Chapter 2 of the EA discusses the merits of the Route A and B 

Alternatives and concluded that the Route B Alternative is a 

longer route, would require more time for trains to travel from 

Chicago to Iowa City, and would require more upgrade of rail, 

signals, and other infrastructure. The Route B Alternative would 

not attract as many riders as the Route A Alternative, and fewer 

vehicle, bus, and plane trips would be diverted to rail. Emissions

 from trains would be higher from the Route B Alternative and 

would not be offset by trip diversions as much as Route A. 

Environmental impacts (wetlands, streams, and hazardous 

waste sites) would be greater on Route B. Taking all of these 

factors into consideration, the Preferred Alternative for the 

intercity passenger rail is the Route A Alternative. Commuter rail

 from Joliet to La Salle would serve a different function than the 

proposed intercity passenger rail service and selection of the 

Route A Alternative does not preclude the development of a 

commuter rail system from Joliet to Peru/La Salle.

Fabian, Karen - KET Corporation Comment ID: 28

Address: PO Box 764 Date: 9 /29/2009

Morris, IL 60450 Comment Website

Comment: Having a passenger train stop in Morris would definitely improve commerce in our town. Please go 

with alternative plan B.

Topic(s): Support B Response: Comment noted

Fries, Richard and Rebecca Comment ID: 88

Address: 1020 Buell Ave Date: 10/9 /2009

Joliet, IL 60435 Comment Website

Comment: We understand there used to be a train that went from Chicago to Iowa City, the Rock Island and it 

would be great to have it back. We think it would be great to have a train from Chicago to Iowa City 

that goes through Joliet. There are many students from Joliet that attend the University of Iowa and 

this would be a great way to get home and back. It would also be nice to be able to visit Iowa City 

from Joliet for football games, basketball games and visiting friends and not have to drive. We are 

both alumni from the University of Iowa and believe there are many more here in Joliet. It is a great 

idea and we think it should be done.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Gehrke, Judith Comment ID: 90

Address: #1 Linder Lane NE Date: 10/11/2009

Iowa City, IA 52240 Comment Website

Comment: The Delbert Gehrke family of Iowa City, Ia. is ecstatic about the proposal to have train service 

between Mendota and I.C. We were raised in Mendota and 10 of us now live in I.C. My husband 

worked for the Iowa Athletic Dept for 35 yrs and I taught school. Our children and grandchildren are 

here as well as many friends and students at U of Iowa that are from the Mendota area. There are 

many Hawk fans in the area and student parents that travel from Mendota to I.C. Our hospitals, UIHC 

and VA service many people in the Mendota area. I travel from I.C. to Mendota to visit my Mother 
8

every 10 days. The truck traffic on I80 is stressful and many seniors will find the train service that 

passes the beautiful countryside/over Miss. river a real vacation trip. We already took a train from Mt. 

Plesant to Princeton...just "experience a train ride" but there was no Mendota stop (disappointing). 

Hurray for the Mendota Iowa City train. Count 10 votes from us.

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted

Hahn, Jerry - Hahn Studio Comment ID: 69

Address: 113 S Ward St Date: 10/6 /2009

Geneseo, IL 61254 Comment Email

Comment: SUBJECT: I am writing in support of the State of Iowa and State of Illinois ARRA application for 

passenger rail service between Chicago, Quad Cities, and Iowa City. I am a retired employee of the 

US Army Corps of Engineers (Rock Island). During the mid 1960’s (while in the military) and 

beginning in 1969 as a resident and small business owner here in Geneseo, I fully enjoyed and 

profited by the existence of passenger rail service to points east and west. I utilized passenger rail 

service coast to coast for business travel, and personal and recreational purposes. As a Human 

Resources Manager responsible for staffing at the Corps of Engineers District Office, travel 

arrangements for new employees often included train travel. The gradual loss of this option 

complicated travel planning and was more costly. Enjoyable and affordable rail access to locations 

east and west for business travel, educational purposes (college travel for children), and plain old 

family fun train trips to places like Chicago were not there as a travel option during much of this time. 

I fully support the idea of reigniting passenger rail service across this part of the Midwest, especially 

this Chicago through Geneseo to the Quad Cities and Iowa City segment. I cannot help but believe 

that the economic, job creation, educational, recreational, and overall quality of life impacts will be 

100% positive.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Hannafan, Terrence Comment ID: 12

Address: 1715 N 8th St Date: 9 /24/2009

Clinton, IA 52732 Comment Website

Comment: Good morning, I firmly support expanded passenger rail service in the upper Midwest. Two 

suggestions for future routes: Chicago-Clinton-Cedar Rapids; Minneapolis-St. Louis. Thank you.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Hausler, Bob - City of Plano Comment ID: 16

Address: 17 E Main St Date: 9 /23/2009

Plano, IL 60545 Comment Email

Comment: Hi Amanda, The City of Plano, Illinois supports the Chicago, Illinois and Iowa City, Iowa Alternate 

Route "A" rail line with stops in Plano, Illinois. Thank You,

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted

Hausler, Bob - City of Plano Comment ID: 8

Address: 17 E Main St Date: 9 /23/2009

Plano, IL 60545 Comment Email

Comment: Rick, The City of Plano, Illinois supports the Chicago, Illinois and Iowa City, Iowa Alternate Route "A"

 rail line with stops in Plano, Illinois. Thank You, Mayor Robert A Hausler, City of Plano, Illinois

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted

Helsell, Charles Comment ID: 59

Address: 551 Ashton Place NE, Apt 4 Date: 10/1 /2009

Cedar Rapids, IA 52402 Comment Email

Comment: I have heard about this proposed passenger train route (Iowa City to Chicago via Quad Cities) and 

support such a route added to Amtrak's system. It does seem to me that such a route would benefit 

from having Cedar Rapids as the terminus rather than Iowa City. In other words, that the route would 

start in Cedar Rapids and continue to Iowa City, etc. I say this not just because I live in Cedar Rapids

 and would use that passenger train to visit Chicago (and, possibly, to go on to other Amtrak 
9

destinations) but because I see Cedar Rapids as a much larger metropolitan area than Iowa City and

 including it in a proposed route would add considerably to passenger use of the route and to the 

financial viability and success of the route. There may be some very good reasons why Cedar 

Rapids is not or cannot be considered for this route including difficulty linking Cedar Rapids with the 

Iowa City route or other difficulties. I only provide this (and this may be the wrong organization to 

suggest this to) because it seems like such an obvious city to include in your plans.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Iowa City was identified as the western terminus of the 

proposed Chicago to Iowa City Intercity passenger rail service 

based on the University of Iowa and area hospitals. A 

substantial number of University students are from Illinois; it is 

anticipated that many of these students, family, and others 

would travel by train from Iowa City to various destinations 

between the Quad Cities and Chicago. Traffic generated by the 

hospitals, the business community, and area residents would 

add to the rail service demand.

The proposed Chicago to Iowa City Intercity passenger rail 

service would use the existing Iowa Interstate Railroad (IAIS) 

from Wyanet, Illinois to Iowa City to provide service from 

Chicago to Iowa City via the Quad Cities (the Quad Cities was 

previously identified as a destination from Chicago within the 

Midwest Regional Rail System). The IAIS rail line extends from 

Utica, Illinois through Wyanet, Illinois to the Quad Cities and 

continues across southern Iowa to Iowa City, Des Moines, and 

Omaha. Iowa DOT has submitted a Track 3 application to 

extend passenger rail service across Iowa to Omaha. The 

Midwest Regional Rail Initiative identified the IAIS rail line as the

 route for the proposed Chicago to Omaha passenger rail 

service based on available line capacity (the IAIS line is lightly 

used for freight traffic, as compared to the heavily used Union 

Pacific and BNSF Railway lines). 

Cedar Rapids, Iowa has been identified as one of the locations 

for the proposed feeder bus system that would link additional 

Midwest cities to the Midwest Regional Rail System. Feeder 

bus system service is anticipated to begin with the ultimate 

service level of five round-trip trains per day.

Hodgden, Dianna Comment ID: 37

Address: Date: 10/1 /2009

Comment Email

Comment: I would like to voice my support for a rail service linking Iowa City with Chicago. Our son lives in 

Chicago and traveling to see him has become difficult due to older age. This service would benefit 

us greatly.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Jirak, David Comment ID: 25

Address: 3229 Middle Rd Date: 9 /28/2009

Davenport, IA 52803 Comment Website

Comment: Use Route A...It's the fastest route from QCA to Chicago. If we are going to make Amtrak appeal 

over automobiles we need to get people to their destinations as fast if not faster than automobiles.

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted

Johnson, Roger Comment ID: 45

Address: 12 Walbrier Ct Date: 9 /29/2009

LeClaire, IA 52753 Comment Meeting Comment Form

Comment: We use Amtrak to visit two children in Chicago. Anxious for Moline service! No place to park in 
10

Chicago - they don't want your car. Tickets are less than auto parking (~ $50/nt) Traffic delays in 

Chicago avoided. No charge for bags. No lost bags. Big seats. Can walk around on-board. Can buy 

last-minute ticket at fair price - unlike airlines. Airports are subsidized, highways are subsidized - so 

rail merits support also. No toll booths. Can arrive 10 minutes early and just get on - no BIG DEAL. 

Under 300-400 miles - airlines are not competitively priced.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Kass, Glenn Comment ID: 43

Address: 3630 Pine Ridge Ct, Apt 205 Date: 9 /29/2009

Moline, IL 61265 Comment Meeting Comment Form

Comment: Option A is definitely the choice. It appears to have the most logical build process and timeline. It 

also has the support of the various entities that must sign-off. Couple of questions: 1) Why are there 

more environmentally friendly trains in Europe than here? Seems we could further impact that area 

unless there is a reason? Particulate matter has hurt the QC so what is the impact with this project? 

Up or down in levels? 2) How would this affect our airport in Moline? I would not want to shift 

resources and loose that valuable service. 3) We have been told publicly "within two years" this could

 begin. The charts show 2014 for start of service. Isn't this project more in the "New Deal" area the 

federal recovery act should serve? Why are there no funds to assist Moline, Iowa City and Wyanet to

 get this program moving? Moline definitely doesn't have, nor will they have, the $mil that is needed 

for the station. I fully support this project. If the extra time is needed to do it right and avoid an "I80" 

bridge scenario in the future, then take it. However, a better job of communicating expectations to the

 public would be nice. I want to thank the federal, state, regional and local reps that keep pushing this

 program. Paul Rumler, et.al, should be recognized. But push harder and make the dollars work.

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted

Topic(s): Transportation Response: Federal grant money has been applied for to construct the track,

 signaling, and related infrastructure improvements. The 

proposed Moline station is anticipated to be part of the 

transportation-oriented development planned for downtown 

Moline, as discussed on pages 2-5 and 3-16 in the EA.

Topic(s): Air Quality Response: As discussed on page 3-49 in the EA, emissions of particulate 

matter would minimally increase.

Lange, Richard Comment ID: 24

Address: 532 8th St Date: 9 /28/2009

LaSalle, IL 61301 Comment Website

Comment: 1) the corridor maps discussed on radio PSAs and the home page don't appear on this web site. 2) 

Absent those corridor maps I'm working from my geographic memory of the rail grades in the area. 

Comment: The "northern option" from Wyanette, IL into Chicago simply expands service to towns 

already serviced by Amtrak (i.e.) Mendota, Plano, etc. The "southern option would provide likely 

provide service to LaSalle, Ottawa, Morris connecting / expanding existing service to Joliet. As a 

citizen of LaSalle, IL and a user of Amtrak (Mendota connection) my preference would be the 

"southern option" expanding travel and connection options to thousands of users and non-current 

users alike. Richard Lange

Topic(s): Support B Response: Comment noted

Latino, Mike - Exelon Corporation Comment ID: 86

Address: 16850 Swift Arrow Dr Date: 10/9 /2009

Lockport, IL 60441 Comment Website

Comment: I would be very much in favor of a train route between Chicago and Iowa City. I live in the Joliet area 

and my daughter is attending University of Iowa. I as well as several of my friends from the area who 

also have children at U of Iowa, discuss frequently how unfortunate it is that there is only a bus 

option. This would be a great addition to the transportation grid in the Midwest.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted
11

Latino, Mike - Exelon Corporation Comment ID: 87

Address: 16850 Swift Arrow Dr Date: 10/9 /2009

Lockport, IL 60441 Comment Email

Comment: I would be very much in favor of a train route connecting Iowa City and Chicago. I live in the Joliet 

area and my daughter attends the University of Iowa. I also have several friends who are similarly 

situated. We often comment on the lack of transportation options. The bus is the most available 

choice. Train service would greatly enhance the transportation grid in the Midwest.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Lohman, Brett - Lohman Companies Comment ID: 55

Address: 935 S Oakwood Ave, PO Box 297 Date: 9 /29/2009

Geneseo, IL 61254-0297 Comment Letter

Comment: I am writing you to express my support for the passenger rail service between the Quad cities and 

Chicago with a stop in Geneseo. We would find a stop in Geneseo for convenient for to commute to 

Chicago to meet with the Insurance Companies we do business with as well as customers we have 

in Chicago. I would also like to share with you that when my father and uncles came up with the idea 

to build the Illini Beef plant is Joslin, Il (now known as the Tyson plant) passenger service on the 

Butterworth car was instrumental in getting this development off the ground. My father and uncles 

made weekly trips to Chicago for many years to get financing, design the plant, interview potential 

management candidates, sell stock in the company, and line up potential purchasers of the product. 

They also had to run their own company at the same time so available time was in short supply. The 

passenger service offered on the Butterworth car allowed them to board downtown Geneseo then 

meet with each other and other employees and board members on the way up to Chicago and back 

as well as the time saving of getting off the train downtown Chicago and being just blocks away from 

their appointments.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Lorenz, Jr, Francis Comment ID: 10

Address: 6331 N Knox Ave Date: 9 /23/2009

Chicago, IL 60646 Comment Website

Comment: Hooray! The more viable options for travel, the better. As a nation, we need to expand rail service, 

especially true "High Speed", as in Europe and Japan. I suppose we can learn to "walk" first with 79 

mph trains to Iowa City, but faster trains to Des Moines and Omaha should be considered, too.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted. As discussed on page 2-8 of the EA, trains 

would operate at a maximum speed of 90 mph between 

Chicago and Wyanet with implementation of the ultimate service

 level of five round-trip trains per day.

Love, Robert & Sheri Comment ID: 96

Address: 510 Armstrong St Date: 10/14/2009

Morris, IL 60450 Comment Website

Comment: The train tracks go right along our back yard. Even the freight trains alone are so loud it wakes me out

 of my sleep. I cant imagine having more train traffic. We have 6 children and don’t want to risk 

anything happening to them. I see kids walking those tracks all the time!! Please do not allow any 

more train traffic!!

Topic(s): Opposition to B Response: As discussed in the EA (pages 3-34, 3-35, and sheets 17 and 

18 for the Route B Alternative in Appendix C), noise levels 

would minimally increase in Morris. Pages 3-26 and 3-27 of the 

EA discuss public safety; grade crossing warnings would be 

upgraded and highway congestion would decrease, improving 

safety.
12

Ludwig, Rhonda - Geneseo City of Commerce Comment ID: 53

Address: 100 W Main St Date: 9 /29/2009

Geneseo, IL 61254 Comment Letter

Comment: The Board of Directors of Geneseo Chamber of Commerce along with its membership, proudly 

invites passenger rail into our community. Geneseo businessmen/residents have donated addition 

land to enhance the existing facility for passenger rail, reaffirming Geneseo's commitment to this 

great mode of travel. As a leader in Henry county tourism, Geneseo Chamber of Commerce & 

Tourism Center will offer its services to make certain passengers feel welcomed and included as 

part of our quaint town upon their arrival. Those who embark on the rail experience from Geneseo will

 leave confident and informed of all services provided by Amtrak. Passenger Rail, welcome to 

Geneseo! When you're here, you're home!

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Marks, Jean - Nash Nash Bean & Ford LLP Comment ID: 32

Address: 445 US Hwy 6 E Date: 9 /30/2009

Geneseo, IL 61254 Comment Letter

Comment: I am writing in support of the State of Iowa and State of Illinois ARRA application for passenger rail 

service between Chicago, Quad Cities and Iowa City. I can speak for myself and for family that we 

would most definitely utilize the service. There has been times when our family has missed a family 

function in the Chicago area because we didn't have reliable transportation and there have been 

times we've had to take off work to drive an ill family member to Iowa city for a medical appointment. 

My 9 year old daughter would love to have a gift of train tickets to Chicago to go [to] the museums 

and the American Girl Store. She and her Dad would be willing to take the train to a Chicago Cubs 

game. Please consider a passenger railstop in Geneseo. Thank you for your time and consideration 

in this matter.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Mathias, Dean - Quad Cities Transportation Advocacy Group Comment ID: 38

Address: 745 Hillcrest Rd Date: 9 /29/2009

Milan, IL 61264 Comment Meeting Comment Form

Comment: Trains and bikes and buses ROCK!! Thanks for the excellent poster graphics. Favor Route A along 

Hennepin - already train connections for Joliet. Train station need to accommodate bikes parking and 

protection for bikes from the elements. Amtrak rail cars should be prepared to accommodate a large

 volume of bicycle ridership, much as the local buses do a great job hauling bicycles on their front 

racks. Use Europe as [didn't finish thought]. Amtrak should also encourage bicyclists from THE 

OUTSET!!! Those bicyclists already have the alternative transportation frame of mind. Ads should 

include bicyclists to encourage riders from one community to travel to another as well as 

demonstrate the alternative transportation life style. Thank you for your efforts.

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted

McGowan, Tommy Comment ID: 27

Address: 407 W Jackson St Date: 9 /29/2009

Morris, IL 60450 Comment Website

Comment: I heard on the local radio about the 2 proposed routes and I believe the route with the CSX way 

through Joliet and Morris is good, because the other route already sees a lot of Amtrak trains 

everyday and there are no passenger trains through Morris, Ottawa, or other towns on that line, and 

those towns probably would appreciate trains to Chicago and the Quad Cities.

Topic(s): Support B Response: Comment noted

Mickley, Joe - Hanford Insurance Agency Comment ID: 33

Address: 119 S State St Date: 9 /30/2009

Geneseo, IL 61254 Comment Email

Comment: I am writing in support of the State of Iowa and State of Illinois ARRA application for rail service 

between Chicago, Quad Cities and Iowa City. Such a service would enhance the growth and 
13

development of western Illinois. A 2 way transportation system would improve the economic 

advantage for both ends Iowa City and the Chicago area. This would enhance the quality of life for 

many residents of western Illinois. It would open up the culture and education opportunities available 

in the Chicago area. As an owner of a small business that was established in 1855 in western Illinois 

this service is critical to the growth and development of our particular area. Rail service would open 

our community to many residents who work in Chicago but wish to reside in a smaller town. Rail 

service would be highly utilized by our residents for both employment, educational and entertainment

 purposes. Thank You for your consideration in this matter.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Miller, Lora Lea Comment ID: 80

Address: 12433 US Hwy 6 Date: 10/8 /2009

Geneseo, IL 61254 Comment Email

Comment: Rail service...A Much Needed Service. Especially to Iowa City as this area has a large contingent of 

people that are referred to the University of Iowa Medical Center. If you have driven between 

Geneseo and Iowa City on Interstate 80, you would know that corridor is a raceway. Trucks bumper 

to bumper 80 to 85 mph all lanes. Then throw in an ambulance or two plus the personal vehicles... 

not an enjoyable drive and a dangerous one. Rail service would allow patients to get to Iowa City 

without the hassle of driving. The medical center has a pickup and delivery service already in place. 

I’m sure the train depot would not be a problem for the hospital service to cover. This would also be 

a great asset to the veterans in this vicinity as the veterans hospital is in Iowa City. Currently the trip is

 being covered by van. The problem is getting and keeping drivers to and from the hospital in order 

to cover the various appointment times. With train service the appointments could be set up 

according to the train schedule. A valuable service to those who have sacrificed for this country. 

Public transportation in this part of the United States is nonexistant. What a boone to the economics 

of the areas involved with the addition of rail service. I believe the rail service would be an excellent 

investment of taxpayer dollars that would be a benefit to a large segment of the public throughout the

 northern part of Illinois and Iowa.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Moline, Norman - Augustana College Comment ID: 41

Address: 3836 28th Ave Date: 9 /29/2009

Rock Island, IL 61201-5801 Comment Meeting Comment Form

Comment: Route A is the ONLY viable option. Shorter, quicker route is essential. People will ride the train if it 

takes 3 hours, 20 minutes. They will not is it is 4/5 hours. Saves more fuel. Greater benefits to efforts

 to reduce emissions. BNSF line allows work with company well-adapted to handling AMTRAK trains.

 This route also allows better access to key western suburb areas such as Naperville, Oak Brook, the

 whole high-tech corridor which, to be direct, is MORE important than the Joliet and southwest 

corridor. Please move forward with Plan A as quickly as possible.

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted

Moore, Jennifer Comment ID: 78

Address: Date: 10/8 /2009

Comment Website

Comment: I feel this is long overdue. Currently, the route to Iowa from Joliet requires one to go to Chicago first, 

and becomes a 4 hour + journey. With the current congestion on I80 due to the endless construction

 from Joliet to Iowa and the repairs on the I80 bridge, this would be a much needed solution.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Morrison, Charlotte Comment ID: 50

Address: 3906 44th St Date: 9 /29/2009

Rock Island, IL 61201 Comment Meeting Comment Form

Comment: Bring Amtrak to the Quad Cities ASAP. I would never drive to Chicago again for business or 

pleasure. Use the proposed Wyanet route to save money and to do as little damage to the 

environment as possible. *Fastest route is imperative. I completely support passenger rail and all it 
14

can bring to the Quad Cities for economic growth and development. Furthermore, continue to make 

plans and get funding for route from Quad Cities to Iowa City. Many students from Chicago attend 

college/university here in Quad Cities. Additionally many students from Chicago and Quad Cities 

attend University of Iowa. Not to mention the huge fan buses for Iowa sports.

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted

Mowers, Rick - Geneseo Chamber of Commerce Comment ID: 95

Address: 728 Cardinal Ct Date: 10/14/2009

Geneseo, IL 61254 Comment Website

Comment: As a business owner, and resident of Geneseo, I would love to see rail service from Geneseo to 

Chicago and Iowa City. There are many events in both cities that people from Geneseo attend. Even

 more people would attend these events if rail transportation was convenient. I would like to attend 

concerts and theatre events in both locations. Many people are sports fans of the Iowa Hawkeyes, 

and Chicago teams, and would welcome the convenience of rail transportation to these events. It 

would also reduce pollution. There are also events in Geneseo that others would be able to 

participate in via rail transportation.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Neff, Gerald - Iowa Chapter Sierra Club Comment ID: 57

Address: 18144 242nd Ave Date: 10/1 /2009

Pleasant Valley, IA 52767 Comment Website

Comment: I agree with the findings of the Iowa and Illinois DOT that Alternative A would be the better choice. 

We need a third choice for travel in this area other than automobile or air travel. Rail would provide 

that third choice. Now that the price of gasoline has dropped the rail choice loses some of its 

attraction. However, fuel prices will continue to fluctuate and if the rail fares can be competitive with 

driving costs, the chances of people using the trains increases. Reviving rail transportation in this 

country is an absolute must.

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted

Orgeron, Anna Comment ID: 48

Address: 1900 6th Ave Date: 9 /29/2009

Rock Island, IL 61201 Comment Meeting Comment Form

Comment: Would like to see northern route - soon?

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted

Pakala, James Comment ID: 5

Address: 1303 Mautenne Dr Date: 9 /23/2009

Missouri, MO 63021 Comment Website

Comment: My wife and I try to avoid driving because it is private, not public, transportation and long drives can 

be life-threatening (only in part because I fall asleep at the wheel) or medically harmful (my wife has a

 muscle disease that driving or sitting in a car for long periods negatively affects). As to flying, the 

cost and lack of availability to smaller cities is a huge problem. The environmental damage of train 

service is a fraction of that caused by planes and highway vehicles.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Parkyn, John Comment ID: 7

Address: W636 Cherry St Date: 9 /23/2009

Stoddard, WI 54658 Comment Email

Comment: I believe the Northern Route would run more closely through the center of the Chicago area's 

population, allowing it to serve more riders more easily than the Southern Route.

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted
15

Persampiers, Patrick - Balfour Beatty Rail Comment ID: 39

Address: 218 Richmond Hill Dr Date: 9 /29/2009

Geneseo, IL 61254 Comment Meeting Comment Form

Comment: I think Route A Alternative would work. Also the train station at Geneseo should be located on the 

west end of town and not in the middle of town where it might block two crossings.

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted. As noted on page 2-5 in the EA, the proposed

 Geneseo station location will be determined and documented 

in a Tier 2 project-level NEPA document.

Petrella, Suzanne - Kendall County Illinois Comment ID: 56

Address: 111 W Fox St Date: 10/1 /2009

Yorkville, IL 60560 Comment Website

Comment: Alternative A is a much preferred route as the population in this area is in great need of additional 

transportation options. Kendall County has statistically been one of the fastest growing counties in 

the nation during the past several years. Many residents here would appreciate Alternative A as 

would developers and the business community for all the economic opportunities presented. 

Convenience is key, as we have all struggled with the challenges of downtown transportation. Future 

additional service would be most welcome as a way to ease highway congestion.

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted

Pleshe, David Comment ID: 46

Address: 644 Schroeder Rd Date: 9 /29/2009

Coal Valley, IL 61240 Comment Meeting Comment Form

Comment: Plan A looks most promising. Less environmental impact and quicker service. This plan needs to be 

"fast-tracked"!

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted

Pleshe, Becky Comment ID: 47

Address: 644 Schroeder Rd Date: 9 /29/2009

Coal Valley, IL 61240 Comment Meeting Comment Form

Comment: I am in favor of the Chicago to Iowa City rail service. We really need this in the Quad Cities. I prefer 

Plan A but would be happy with either plan.

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted

Powell, Rick Comment ID: 3

Address: 1290 E IL Route 71 Date: 9 /22/2009

Ottawa, IL 61350 Comment Website

Comment: First, I think there should be more public hearings in IL, and closer to the people who might use the 

service. It is nearly 1 1/2 hours to the Quad City meeting from where I live. There are thousands of 

potential customers of this service who live closer to Chicago, and I am doubtful you will capture 

more than a few people from these areas at your IL public hearing. Secondly, I am asking if any of 

the content of the report will be made available on-line on the 24th of September. I am not sure if I 

will have time to visit the library at La Salle. I will have plenty of comments following my review of the EA.

Topic(s): General Comment Response: Comment noted

Rick, Kyle - The Arc Comment ID: 42

Address: 114 57th Pl Date: 9 /29/2009

Davenport, IA 52806 Comment Meeting Comment Form

Comment: Train service to Chicago from the Quad Cities would be heavily used by the business community on a 

periodic commuting basis for meetings/conferences and the like. Route A is definitely preferable not

 only on a cost basis, but on use and time basis. It would directly compete in terms of commute time 

for those using I80 and I88. Recreational use will also be high to commute for entertainment in 

Chicago and also to go to Iowa city for sporting events and theater/music performances. Let's do this!

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted
16

Riley, Jim - Hometown National Bank Comment ID: 14

Address: 260 Bucklin St Date: 9 /24/2009

LaSalle, IL 61301 Comment Email

Comment: Given the opportunity to expand rail service in the northern IL area, adding additional communities to 

a cross state route, I strongly suggest using Alternative B, through LaSalle, Ottawa and Morris. The 

Princeton, Mendota route is already being served by rail service. Offering this area an alternative 

route and destinations is logical if one of the goals is to expand economical public transportation. 

The combined populations of the Alternative B route have no legitimate public transportation east or 

west. The communities mentioned have a combined population which is much larger than the 

existing Alternative A route. I understand some preliminary study has been done supporting a 

LaSalle to Joliet route. That information may provide additional support for an Alternative B decision. 

Alternative B through LaSalle and Morris will expand rail service and open up an additional market. 

Thank you for your consideration.

Topic(s): Support B Response: Comment noted

Rohr, Lynda Comment ID: 81

Address: 319 Parkshore Dr Date: 10/8 /2009

Shorewood, IL 60404 Comment Website

Comment: Having the train stop in Joliet and go to Geneseo would be beneficial for me so that I may see my 

daughter and 3 grandsons...it is 111 miles from my home to hers, and the cost of gas is hard on my 

wallet, plus I am handicapped and hard for me to drive the hour and forty five minutes plus potty 

break. So if I had a vote in this, it would be yes!

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Schlake, Diane - Naperville Police Dept Comment ID: 72

Address: 1127 Bayhill Ave Date: 10/6 /2009

Naperville, IL 60565 Comment Website

Comment: The existing rail will limit the speed. Need to invest in new infrastructure and create High Speed Rail 

like in Asia and Europe...US is so far behind, because we love our cars

Topic(s): Alternatives Response: As discussed in Section 2.4 of the EA, the maximum speed of 

operation would increase to 90 mph from Chicago to Wyanet 

with implementation of the ultimate service level of five roundtrip trains per day, as envisioned by the Midwest Regional Rail 

Initiative.

Sessions, Carl - City High Little Hawk Comment ID: 79

Address: Date: 10/8 /2009

Iowa City, IA Comment Email

Comment: My name is Carl Sessions, and I'm the news editor at the City High Little Hawk in Iowa City. We are 

interested in doing a story about the possible train that would go from Chicago to Iowa City, but we 

have some questions. Is there anyone you could recommend me to talk to about it?

Topic(s): General Comment Response: Comment noted

Sheridan, Arthur - City of Plano Comment ID: 15

Address: 17 E Main St Date: 9 /23/2009

Plano, IL 60545 Comment Email

Comment: Please provide mailing address for comments.

Topic(s): General Comment Response: Comment noted

Sheridan, Arthur - City of Plano Comment ID: 36

Address: 17 E Main St Date: 9 /29/2009

Plano, IL 60545 Comment Email

Comment: The City of Plano, IL. IS DEFINITELY IN FAVOR and wishes to support the routing of the rail line 

thru Plano, Il.
17

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted

Souferis, Athena Comment ID: 91

Address: Date: 10/12/2009

Skokie, IL 60077 Comment Website

Comment: This is needed so much...the university students and their families have no way of getting to Iowa 

from Chicago and the reverse unless they drive. This is unheard in this time and age w/such demand

 and such a large student body.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Steinbrecher, Lew - City of Moline Comment ID: 31

Address: 619 16th St Date: 9 /30/2009

Moline, IL 61265 Comment Email

Comment: Thank you for both this email and the voice message you left on my phone here at City Hall this 

morning. I appreciate the opportunity to express my support for the intercity passenger rail service 

being proposed between Chicago and Iowa City through Moline.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Stroka, Thomas - Midwest High Speed Rail Association Comment ID: 11

Address: 622 Franklin St, Apt 4 Date: 9 /23/2009

Michigan City, IN 46360 Comment Website

Comment: I firmly support the efforts to build a high speed rail connecting Iowa City to Chicago Union Station. I 

grew up along the BNSF line in the suburbs of Chicago and my whole family continues to live on both

 sides of the tracks there. With updated crossings along the rail line, I see no problem using the 

existing track for a high speed rail to Iowa City. The major problem I see is the number of stops 

along the way. Every high speed train I took when I lived in France had only one or two stops before 

the final destination...I believe the only stops should be Joliet, LaSalle, Moline and Iowa City. The 

train will become a more viable option for travelers only if it is as convenient in terms of getting to 

their destination as quickly as (or much more quickly than) driving. Good luck with the work that lies 

ahead of you.

Topic(s): Support B Response: Comment noted

Studer, Judith Comment ID: 82

Address: 518 N Hebbard St Date: 10/8 /2009

Joliet, IL 60432 Comment Email

Comment: Absolutely, YES--the ability to take a train to Iowa City would be a huge positive opportunity!

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Stumpe, Dan Comment ID: 70

Address: 2315 Beauport Dr Date: 10/6 /2009

Naperville, IL 60564 Comment Info Line

Comment: I gotta tell ya, I'm really excited about the Chicago to Iowa City route. I think it's about time - it's a 

great idea for getting kids back and forth to the University of Iowa. I hope you can extend it - in time - 

to Des Moines and maybe up to Ames to get more students. I think it's long overdue. It's one that we

 will be using and using often.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Terronez, Darrell - Western Illinois University Comment ID: 44

Address: 321 9th St Date: 9 /29/2009

Silvis, IL 61282 Comment Meeting Comment Form

Comment: Meeting/presentation was extremely informative. Rail from Iowa City to Chicago and from Chicago to

 Iowa City is exciting. This area will benefit greatly financially and culturally. Passenger rail will 

eliminate traffic congestion on the interstate/highways and be better for the environment. This is a 

safe way to travel. Traveling by rail allows you to relax, enjoy the scenery and meet new people. This 
18

is very exciting! Hope it happens soon.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Tomzik, David Comment ID: 30

Address: 702 Brandon Date: 9 /29/2009

Wheeling, IL 60690 Comment Website

Comment: Route option B will provide improved mobility, access and economic development to the Illinois 

River communities. This line at one time supported rail service which can return. The Joliet- LaSalle 

corridor is a well defined corridor with strong interaction between these communities. In addition, this

 line will connect with the 110mph line to Bloomington, Springfield and St Louis at Joliet.

Topic(s): Support B Response: Comment noted

Turpin, Gary Comment ID: 18

Address: 32 Cobblestone Lane Date: 9 /27/2009

LeClaire, IA 52722 Comment Website

Comment: I have used the Amtrak Service from Galesburg to Chicago three times in the last year and find it 

wonderful. When Quad Cities link is completed I will use it at least monthly or even more often. I 

prefer Alternative A. I would favor seeing this "Fast Tracked" in some fashion. Use some of that 

Obama money to get this done quickly.

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted

Wallace, Ryan Comment ID: 4

Address: 3900 N Pine Grove, Apt 714 Date: 9 /23/2009

Chicago, IL 60613 Comment Website

Comment: As a resident of Chicago, graduate of University of Iowa, and someone who has family in the Des 

Moines metro area, I am thoroughly excited about the prospects of a Chicago-Iowa City rail 

connection. Many rural citizens never experience the great city of Chicago because the drive can be 

so daunting. Many students at the U of Iowa come from the Chicago-land area and have extremely 

limited options to return home for weekends and holidays. I hope that due diligence is done to 

determine a route that has the least impact, but I wholeheartedly believe a rail connection from Iowa 

City to Chicago is to everyone's mutual benefit.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Weber, Sue Comment ID: 77

Address: 610 Manhattan Rd Date: 10/8 /2009

Joliet, IL 60433 Comment Website

Comment: this would be great, we currently travel to my sisters house in Colo Iowa several times a year, and 

this would wonderful as we wouldn't have to deal with that horrible semi truck traffic. It would even be 

better if it went all the way to Des Moines or at least Ames Iowa.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Werner, Ken - Werner Restoration Services Inc. Comment ID: 34

Address: PO Box 496 Date: 9 /30/2009

Colona, IL 61241-0496 Comment Email

Comment: I just want to voice my support for the proposed rail service from Chicago , thru the Quad Cities and 

Geneseo area to Iowa City. This would have a huge impact on the Quad City economy along with 

Geneseo. My home town of Geneseo would benefit from this service both economically and socially.

 My family would use it for both business and pleasure. Trains have had a big impact on our 

community before and it will help in future. My business, WERNER RESTORATION SERVICES with

 our 30 employees , frequently travel to Chicago and Iowa City for training and could use this service.

 Geneseo has land that was donated years ago just for this possibility so the interest is here. Thanks 

for your time.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted
19

Werner, Ken - Werner Restoration Services Inc. Comment ID: 40

Address: PO Box 496 Date: 9 /29/2009

Colona, IL 61241-0496 Comment Meeting Comment Form

Comment: My opinion is rail service not only to Chicago but also west to Omaha will benefit the Quad Cities and 

the surrounding areas a great deal. I would like to specifically see Geneseo included as a stop. The 

City of Geneseo has a great interest in the rail service. We have land already donated for the 

location. We have a fall event called "Planes, Trains and Automobiles" that has shown tremendous 

growth in the past few years, with a great interest in the trains that have been part of the events. 

Personally, I have 10 brothers and sisters that travel a great deal and who would be interested in a 

safe, inexpensive mode of transportation. My family attends many Chicago sporting events each 

year and have driven to Princeton to catch the train. My son has just graduated from the University of 

Nebraska at Lincoln and would have used this to commute. My sister lives in Omaha and would use 

it. I am the owner of Werner Restoration Services of Colona, IL, and have many employees who 

receive training in Chicago and Omaha. We all feel the rail service would be an awesome addition to 

the whole Quad City community.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Comment noted

Wilkins, Jeff - Kendall County Board Comment ID: 97

Address: 111 W Fox St Date: 10/14/2009

Yorkville, IL 60560 Comment Email

Comment: The Kendall County Board unanimously passed the resolution in support of alternative “A” at the 

County Board meeting held Tuesday, October 6, 2009.

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted

Wolff, Sue Comment ID: 19

Address: 605 W 7th St Date: 9 /28/2009

Sterling, IL 61081 Comment Website

Comment: I would be beyond HAPPY if the train would be using the BNSF rail and go through Princeton Illinois. 

My family would be riding it instead of driving from Sterling to Chicago and back again every 

weekend just to see our grandchild.

Topic(s): Support A Response: Comment noted

Yapp, John - City of Iowa City Comment ID: 60

Address: Date: 10/2 /2009

Comment Email

Comment: Theresa, Dale Helling (Iowa City City Manager) asked me to contact you. Thank you for the notice of

 the Tier 1 Environmental Review for passenger rail service between Chicago and Iowa City. We are

 certainly excited about the opportunity to bring back passenger rail service to our area, and we 

appreciate your efforts in obtaining public comment. To that end, let us know if we can provide any 

assistance in obtaining public input between now and October 15. The Iowa City City Council has 

recently approved a resolution of support for passenger rail service, and we have obtained several 

other letters of support from community stakeholders which we have forwarded to Amanda Martin at 

Iowa DOT. Let us know if you would like copies of these also.

Topic(s): General Support Response: Thank you. Comment noted

 
20

This Page Intentionally Left Blank 

 
21

EA Agency Comments

Department of the Army-US Army Garrison - Rock Island Arsenal Comment ID: 64

Joel Himsl, Garrison Manager Date: 9 /29/2009

1 Rock Island Arsenal Comment Letter

Rock Island, IL 61299-5000

Comment: Reference Illinois Department of Transportation (DOT) letter, August 19, 2009. In response to 

your letter dated August 19, 2009, the US Army Garrison-Rock Island Arsenal (USAG-RIA) is willing to work 

toward an agreement in the future phases of this project to allow passenger trains on the Government Bridge and 

trackage currently leased by the Iowa Interstate Railroad, LTD. Correction is needed in your letter regarding name 

and ownership of the bridge that may be utilized for this project. The bridge name is “Government Bridge” and is 

owned by the US Army Garrison-Rock Island Arsenal, not the US Army Corps of Engineers, Louisville. The US 

Army Corps of Engineers, Louisville administers the current lease of the tracks crossing USAG-RIA between the 

cities of Davenport, Iowa and Rock Island, Illinois. That Lease is with the Iowa Interstate Railroad. USAG-RIA has 

discussed with HDR Inc. proposed improvements to the Government Bridge rail system to include signal 

upgrades and power derailers. Plans and specifications for any such improvements would have to be submitted 

for review and approval by the USAG-RIA, Directorate of Public Works and fully coordinated with the current 

Lease holder before execution. The US Army Engineer District, Rock Island operates a Lock & Dam located at 

the Government Bridge. River traffic has priority, therefore when the Government Bridge swing span is open, rail 

traffic is closed. I look forward to working with you in the future to make USAG-RIA an integral part in transforming 

America’s transportation system through a national network of high-speed rail corridors A copy of this letter has 

been provided to Ms. Nancy Richardson, Director, Iowa Department of Transportation, 800 Lincoln Way, Ames, 

IA 50010 and Mr. Brian Ray, Transportation Engineer, HDR Engineering, Inc. 8404 Indian Hills Drive, Omaha, NE 

68114-4098. If you have any questions please contact Mr Stephen Clark, Chief, Housing and Master Planning 

Division, USAG-RIA Directorate of Public Works, 309-782-2444, Stephen.a.clark@us.army.mil.

 

Topic(s):Transportation Response: The FONSI has been updated to correct the name and 

 ownership of the Government Bridge that crosses the 

 Mississippi River at Rock Island. 

Department of the Army-US Army Garrison - Rock Island Arsenal Comment ID: 65

Joel Himsl, Garrison Manager Date: 9 /29/2009

1 Rock Island Arsenal Comment Letter

Rock Island, IL 61299-5000

Comment: Reference Illinois Department of Transportation (DOT) letter, subject: Chicago to Iowa City 

Intercity Passenger Rail Service Project-Environmental Assessment, August 19, 2009. In response to your letter 

subject as above, dated August 19, 2009, the US Army Garrison-Rock Island Arsenal (USAG-RIA) is willing to 

work toward an agreement in the future phases of this project to allow passenger trains on the Government 

Bridge and trackage currently leased by the Iowa Interstate Railroad, LTD. Correction is needed in your letter 

regarding name and ownership of the bridge that may be utilized for this project. The bridge name is “Government 

Bridge” and is owned by the US Army Garrison-Rock Island Arsenal, not the US Army Corps of Engineers, 

Louisville. The US Army Corps of Engineers, Louisville administers the current lease of the tracks crossing 

USAG-RIA between the cities of Davenport, Iowa and Rock Island, Illinois. That Lease is with the Iowa Interstate 

Railroad. USAG-RIA has discussed with HDR Inc. proposed improvements to the Government Bridge rail system 

to include signal upgrades and power derailers. Plans and specifications for any such improvements would have 

to be submitted for review and approval by the USAG-RIA, Directorate of Public Works and fully coordinated with 

the current Lease holder before execution. The US Army Engineer District, Rock Island operates a Lock & Dam 

located at the Government Bridge. River traffic has priority, therefore when the Government Bridge swing span is 
22

open, rail traffic is closed. I look forward to working with you in the future to make USAG-RIA an integral part in 

transforming America’s transportation system through a national network of high-speed rail corridors A copy of 

this letter has been provided to Ms. Barbara H. Stevens, Chief, Environmental Section, Illinois Department of 

Transportation, 2300 South Dirksen Parkway, Springfield, IL 62764 and Mr. Brian Ray, Transportation Engineer, 

HDR Engineering, Inc. 8404 Indian Hills Drive, Omaha, NE 68114-4098. If you have any questions please contact 

Mr Stephen Clark, Chief, Housing and Master Planning Division, USAG-RIA Directorate of Public Works, 309-

782-2444, Stephen.a.clark@us.army.mil.

 

Topic(s):Transportation Response: The FONSI has been updated to correct the name and 

 ownership of the Government Bridge that crosses the 

 Mississippi River at Rock Island. 

Federal Transit Administration-Region VComment ID: 67

Marisol Simon, Regional Administrator Date: 9 /25/2009

200 West Adams St, Suite 320 Comment Letter

Chicago, IL 60606

Comment: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is providing these comments in regard to the proposed 

passenger rail service between Chicago, Illinois, and Iowa City, Iowa. Since our fellow U.S. Department of 

Transportation operating division, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), is a cooperating agency in this 

effort, our remarks will only address this project’s potential impact on our grantees, and not the NEPA process. In 

each of the two (2) “build” alternatives, existing and proposed commuter rail services in the Chicago metropolitan 

area provided by Metra will be affected by the proposed project. We understand that train scheduling, both 

passenger and freight, will be a major issue in the operation of the proposed new service. Our concern is that 

there is or will be sufficient track capacity along the proposed intercity passenger route to allow both existing and 

proposed passenger and freight services to not be negatively impacted by the additional service. Slower travel 

times for commuters will lead to inconveniences for them and a loss of ridership for Metra. The resulting loss in 

operating revenue for commuter rail services will only magnify the financial struggle that Metra already is 

incurring. Additionally, the Rock Island County Metropolitan Mass Transit District (MetroLINK), which is 

headquartered in Moline, Illinois, and operates municipal bus transit service in the Illinois Quad Cities, is pursuing 

a commuter rail component to its system. This planned service will use the same tracks as the proposed Chicago 

– Iowa City Intercity Passenger Service Project. The analysis of this intercity project should consider the potential 

inclusion of the MetroLINK commuter rail service, when evaluating operations and track capacity. We appreciate 

the opportunity provided to us to respond to the information gathering phase of the environmental review process. 

We ask that you continue to keep us at the FTA – Region V informed of the further development of this project. If 

you have any questions or comments concerning our remarks, please contact Steve Polito at (312) 353-1552. 

Topic(s): Transportation Response: The errata section of the FONSI has been updated to provide 

information on Metra operations in Chicago. The Amtrak 

feasibility study considered all Chicago train operations, 

including Metra operations and, as discussed in the EA (pages 

3-4 and 3-5, 3-11, 3-81 and 3-82), identified Eola Yard in Aurora

 as the major potential source of rail traffic congestion. A track 1

 grant under the Federal Railroad Administration’s High Speed 

Intercity Passenger Rail program has been applied for to 

implement changes at the Eola Yard to improve train traffic flow 

(see Section 3.21 of the EA). 

The errata section of the FONSI has been updated to include a 

brief discussion of the proposed commuter rail system in 

Moline that would be operated by MetroLINK. 

Future Tier 2 Project-level analysis will be conducted to 

determine the impacts to Metra and MetroLINK commuter rail 

system operations from the Chicago to Iowa City Intercity 

passenger rail service. 
23

Fish and Wildlife Service-Chicago Ecological Services Field Office Comment ID: 93

Janice Engle, Acting Field Supervisor Date: 10/13/2009

1250 S Grove Ave, Suite 103 Comment Letter

Barrington, IL 60010

Comment: This responds to your request for comments on the Tier 1 Service Level Environmental 

Assessment (EA) for the Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service project. Illinois Department of 

Transportation and Iowa Department of Transportation, in conjunction with the Federal Railroad Administration 

are evaluating the reestablishment of passenger rail service between the aforementioned cities. The Tier 1 

Service Level EA addresses the service level issues that would be part of the initial operations and the proposed 

alternatives. The Tier 2 Project Level analyses would address specific project level activities. We provide 

comments as they relate to fish and wildlife resources that may be affected by construction and operation of the 

proposed project. We reviewed the information provided in your Tier 1 Service Level EA. We checked our records 

for the presence of federally listed species, Service trust resources, and other fish and wildlife resources that may 

be affected by the proposed project. Based on our review we offer the following comments that should be 

addressed in the Tier 2 Project Level EA. 

Alternatives 

The Tier 1 EA indicates that for both alternatives (Route A and B), track rehabilitation would occur within the 

existing railroad grade. However, some ditching, minor bridge work and culvert work, and other track related 

upgrades would be required outside of the existing railroad grade. The Tier 2 EA should identify the locations of 

these track upgrades and assess possible impacts to natural resources. 

Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 

Noise and Vibration 

The Tier 2 EA should evaluate whether wildlife, particularly migratory birds, would be affected by noise and 

vibration from the possible increase in frequency and speed of trains for both alternatives. 

Parks and Federally or State-listed Natural Areas 

The Tier 2 EA should describe and identify all natural areas providing habitat for wildlife resources that abut the 

right-of-way of the proposed alternatives. These natural areas would include county forest preserves which 

provide valuable habitat for fish and wildlife resources. A figure should be provided in the Tier 2 EA that shows all 

natural areas along the proposed alternatives. Figure 3.11.1 only shows state wildlife management areas and 

neglects to show county forest preserves or other natural areas. 

Threatened and Endangered Species 

This section notes that specific construction impacts to listed and candidate species would be further evaluated in 

the Tier 2 EA. The Tier 2 EA should include a list of the state listed species that are present in aforementioned 

natural areas as some of those species (i.e., migratory birds) are also Service trust resources. 

Indirect and Cumulative Impacts 

The Tier 2 EA should fully disclose all indirect and cumulative impacts to natural resources. The Tier 1 EA only 

discusses anticipated beneficial impacts from the two alternatives. Indirect and cumulative impacts such as those 

that could occur to streams, wetlands, water quality, etc. as a result of proposed track upgrades should be 

indentified as well. These comments only address activities within the Chicago Illinois Field Office coverage area, 

which ends at the Kane-Kendall County border for Alternative A and at the Will-Kendall County border for 

Alternative B. The Service's Rock Island Field Office should be contacted for comments outside of our coverage 

area. This letter provides comment under the authority of, and in accordance with, the provisions of the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (83 Stat. 852 as amended P.L. 91-190,42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Fish and 

Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) and the Endangered Species Act of 

1973, as amended (87 Stat. 884. as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If you have any questions, lease contact 
24

Mr. Shawn Cirton at 847/381-2253, ext. 19. 

Topic(s):Natural Resources Response: Comments noted. Your letter will be referenced during 

completion of the Tier 2 analysis to address your concerns with 

any construction outside the existing railroad grades, noise and 

vibration impacts to wildlife, habitat, protected species, and 

cumulative impacts. The Rock Island Field Office has been 

contacted. 

Fish and Wildlife Service Comment ID: 104

Richard Nelson, Field Supervisor Date: 10/16/2009

Rock Island Field Office, 1511 47th Ave Comment Letter

Moline, IL 61265

Comment: This is in response to your letter of August 17, 2009, requesting our comments on the proposed 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service Project – Environmental Assessment by the 

Federal Railroad Administration, Iowa Department of Transportation, and the Illinois Department of 

Transportation. For the purposes of this letter we will provide information relative to the portion of the 

project within Iowa. Our data indicate that the specie on the enclosed list may occur in the counties of

 your proposed action. Descriptions of the habitat requirements are included with the list. You may 

use these descriptions to help you determine if there is suitable habitat within your project area. In 

order to determine if your project “may affect” species on the enclosed list, we invite you to use a 

new tool the Service has designed to help with the consultation process – the Section 7(a)92) 

Technical Assistance webpage 

(http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/section7/s7process/index/htm). By following the 

instructions, you can determine what your action area is, whether listed species may be found within 

the action area, and if the project may affect listed species. You will find several products on the site 

that can streamline the consultation process for this and future projects. When determining if listed 

species may be located within a project area, you can download county-specific species lists for all 

of the states in Region 3. Species specific best management practices will also eventually be 

available. Example letters and templates are available to assist with documenting “no effect” 

determinations and preparing requests for “not likely to adversely affect” concurrence. These 

comments are provided as technical assistance in accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 

1973 (87 State. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq). National Wetland Inventory maps 

indicate that there may be wetlands within and adjacent to the project area. These areas may be 

affected by the proposed project. The Corps of Engineers is the Federal agency responsible for 

wetland regulation, and we recommend that you contact them for assistance in delineating the 

wetland types and acreage within the project boundary. Priority consideration should be given to 

avoid impacts to these wetland areas. Any future activities in the study area that would alter these 

wetlands may require a Section 404 permit. Unavoidable impacts will require a mitigation plan to 

compensate for any losses of wetland functions and values. The U.S. Army corps of Engineers, 

Clock Tower building, P.O. Box 2004, Rock Island, Illinois, 61201, should be contacted for 

information about the permit process. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please 

contact Heidi Woeber of my staff at (309) 757-5800 extension 209. 

Attachment: Habitat Descriptions for Federal Threatened and Endangered Species in Scott, 

Muscatine, Cedar and Johnson Counties, Iowa. The endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) has 

been noted as occurring in Muscatine County. Indiana bats are considered to potentially occur in 

counties along and south of I-80 in Iowa. Any rea with forested habitat potentially provide suitable 

habitat for this species. Indiana bats migrate seasonally between winter hibernacula and summer 

roosting habitats. Winter hibernacula include caves and abandoned mines. Females form nursery 

colonies under the loose bark of trees (dead or alive) and/or cavities, where each female gives birth 

to a single young in June or early July. A single colony may utilize a number of roost trees during the 

summer, typically a primary roost tree and several alternates. The species of size of tree does not 

appear to influence whether Indiana bats utilize a tree for roosting provided the appropriate bark 

structure is present. During the summery, the Indiana bat frequents the corridors of small streams 

with riparian woods as well as mature upland forests. It forages for insects along stream corridors, 
25

within the canopy of floodplain and upland forests, over clearings with early successional vegetation 

(old fields), along the borders of cropland, along wooded fencerows, over farm ponds, and in 

pastures. Suitable summer habitat in Iowa is considered to have the following characteristics within a 

1⁄2 mile radius of a project site: 1) forest cover of 15% of greater; 2) permanent water; 3) one or 

more of the following tree species: shagbark and shellbark hickory that may be dead or alive, and 

dead bitternut hickory, American elm, slippery elm, eastern cottonwood, silver maple, white oak, red 

oak, post oak, and shingle oak with slabs or plates of loose bark; 4) potential roost trees with 10% or 

more peeling or loose bark. If the project site contains any habitat that fits the above description, it 

may be necessary to conduct a survey to determine whether the bat is present. In addition a search 

for this species should be made prior to any cave-impacting activities. If habitat is present or Indiana 

bats are known to be present, they must not be harmed, harassed or disturbed, and this field office 

should be contacted for further assistance. The eastern prairie fringed orchid (Platanthera 

leucophaea) is listed as threatened and known to occur in Johnson County. It occupies mesic to wet 

grassland habitats. There is no critical habitat designated for this species. Federal regulations 

prohibit any commercial activity involving this species or the destruction, malicious damage, or 

removal of this species from Federal land or any other lands in knowing violation of State law or 

regulation, including State criminal trespass law. Growth of the prairie fringed orchid beings in May 

and flowering occurs in July. This species should be search for whenever wet prairie remnants or 

other wet meadows are encountered. The prairie bush clover (Lespedeza leptostchya) is listed as 

threatened and considered to potentially occur statewide in Iowa based on historical records and 

habitat distribution, although we have no record of occurrences in Cedar, Johnson, Scott, and 

Muscatine Counties. It occupies dry to mesic prairies with gravelly soil. There is no critical habitat 

designated for this species. Federal regulations prohibit any commercial activity involving this 

species or the destruction, malicious damage, or removal of this species from Federal land or any 

other lands in knowing violation of State law or regulation, including State criminal trespass law. This 

species should be searched for whenever prairie remnants are encountered. The western prairie 

fringed orchid (Plantanthera praeclara) is listed as threatened and considered to potentially occur 

statewide in Iowa based on historical records and habitat distribution although we have no record of 

occurrences in Cedar, Johnson, Scott, and Muscatine Counties. It occupies wet to mesic grassland 

habitats. There is no critical habitat designated for this species. Federal regulations prohibit any 

commercial activity involving this species or the destruction, malicious damage, or removal of this 

species from Federal land or any other lands in knowing violation of State law or regulation, including 

State criminal trespass law. This species should be searched for whenever prairie remnants are 

encountered. The endangered Higgins eye pearlymussel (Lampsilis higginsii) is listed for the 

Mississippi River north of Lock and Dam 20 which includes Muscatine and Scott Counties. This 

species prefers sand/gravel substrates with a swift current and is most often found in the main 

channel border or an open, flowing side channel. The project lies within the range of the eastern 

massasauga (Sistrurus c. cataenatus), a docile rattlesnake that is declining throughout its national 

range and is currently a Federal Candidate species. The snake is currently listed as endangered by 

the State of Iowa and is known to occur in Johnson and Muscatine Counties. Your proactive efforts to

 conserve this species no may help avoid the need to list the species under the Endangered 

Species Act in the future. Due to their reclusive nature, we encourage early project coordination to 

avoid potential impacts to massasaugas and their habitat. The massasauga is often found in or near 

wet areas, including wetlands, wet prairie, or nearby woodland or shrub edge habitat. This often 

includes dry goldenrod meadows with a mosaic of early successional woody species such as 

dogwood or multiflora rose Wet habitat and nearby dry edges are utilized by the snakes, especially 

during the spring and the fall. Dry upland areas up to 1.5 miles away are utilized during the summer, if 

available. 

The project lies within the range of the freshwater sheepnose mussel (Plethobasus cyphyus) that is 

declining throughout its national range and is currently a Federal Candidate species. It is known to occur 

in Johnson, Muscatine, and Scott Counties. Significant declines relative to its historical distribution and its 

small isolated remaining populations continue to be threatened.

Topic(s): Natural Resources Response: Comments noted. As noted in the EA in Section 3.17.2, 
26

specific construction impacts for listed and candidate species 

will be evaluated further in the Tier 2 Project Level NEPA 

review. Any required field work and consultation, if needed, will 

be conducted as part of the Tier 2 Project Level NEPA review. 

The errata section of the FONSI includes reference to the 

Eastern Massasauga rattlesnake and the Sheepnose mussel in 

accordance with the attachment to your letter.

Illinois EPA, Bureau of Air Comment ID: 66

Mike Rogers Date: 9 /30/2009

1021 N Grand Ave E Comment Email

Springfield, IL 62794-9276

Comment: Below is a link from Michael Leslie of Region V to what I think is the most recent final rule (July 

17, 2006, 71 FR 40420) dealing with general conformity de minimis thresholds. It includes that same weird 

language that doesn’t specifically address moderate and marginal ozone NAAs, but just “Other areas inside 

(outside) an ozone transport region.” The threshold for such areas outside an ozone transport region is 100 tpy 

for both VOC and Nox. For Illinois PM2.5 nonattainment areas the threshold is also 100 tpy and should be 

assessed for direct PM2.5, SO2, and Nox emissions. Let me know if you have any questions. 

[http://www.epa.gov/air/genconform/documents/Jul06/EPA-HQ- OAR-2004-0491-0026.pdf]

Topic(s):Air Quality Response: The FONSI has been updated to evaluate emissions of sulfur 

dioxide from train operations and diversion of vehicle and plane 

trips between Chicago and Quad Cities.

Illinois Historic Preservation Agency Comment ID: 103

Anne Haaker, Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Date: 10/14/2009

1 Old State Capitol Plz Comment Letter

Springfield, IL 62701-1512

Comment: We have reviewed the information provided in the Environmental Assessment regarding the 

above referenced project. Our review is required by section 106 of the National historic Preservation Act of 1966, 

as amended. We advice that there may be properties of architectural, historical or archaeological significance that 

are on or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places within the project Boundaries. This will require 

consultation with this office to avoid adverse effects as defined in 36 CFR 800. We look forward to receiving and 

reviewing the information we requested in a letter dated September 1, 2009, and working with you as the 

project continues. If you have any questions, please contact Emilie Eggemeyer, Cultural Resources 

Manager, #1 Old State Capitol Plaza, Springfield, IL 62701, 217/785-3977. 

Topic(s): Cultural Resources Response: Thank you for your comment. Project-level specific analysis will

 be conducted under Tier 2 NEPA Project-level documentation. 

Consultation with your office under Section 106 of the National 

Historic Preservation Act with regard to architectural, historical, 

and archaeological resources will occur during this process as 

specific resources, potential impacts, and concerns are identified. 

Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Comment ID: 101

John Froman, Chief Date: 9 /9 /2009

118 S Eight Tribes Trail, PO Box 1527 Comment Letter

Miami, OK 74355

Comment: Thank you for notice of the referenced projects. The Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma is 

currently unaware of any documentation directly linking Indian Religious Sites to the proposed construction. In the 

event any items falling under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) are 
27

discovered during construction, the Peoria Tribe request notification and further consultation. The Peoria Tribe 

has no objection to the proposed construction. However, if any human skeletal remains and/or objects falling 

under NAGPRA are uncovered during construction, the construction should stop immediately, and the appropriate 

persons, including state and tribal NAGPRA representatives contacted.

Topic(s): Cultural Resources Response: Thank you for your comment. Project-level specific analysis will

 be conducted under Tier 2 NEPA documentation. Coordination 

with agencies will occur during this process as specific 

resources, potential impacts, and concerns are identified. 

United States Enviromental Protection Agency-Region 6 Comment ID: 102

Kenneth Westlake, Chief, NEPA Implementation Section Date: 10/14/2009

77 West Jackson Blvd Comment Letter

Chicago, IL 60604-3590

Comment: Under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality 

regulations and Section 309 of the Clean Air Act, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reviews and 

comments on major federal action. Typically, these reviews focus on environmental Impact Statements (EIS), but 

we also have the discretion to review and comment on other environmental documents prepared under NEPA if 

interest and resources permit. EPA has reviewed the Draft Tier 1 Service Level Environmental Assessment (EA) 

for the above project. This letter provides our comments on that document and possible impacts related to the 

proposed project. We previously provided scoping comments for this project on September 22, 2009 regarding 

purpose and need, alternatives, environmental impacts, and mitigation of unavoidable impacts. We appreciate 

this document noted air quality improvements anticipated and the environmental savings from traffic and fuel 

efficiencies for the alternatives considered. Surface waters and wetlands were mentioned as possibly being 

impacted where bridge and culvert work may be needed, but identification of these sites and best management 

practices to be utilized are deferred to Tier II NEPA documentation. 

The preferred alternative requires a connecting segment be constructed in Wyanet, Illinois, and will need work 

done within the Pond Creek floodplain. This will be addresses in a separate Tier II document. We acknowledge 

that the Tier I document provides extensive consideration of noise and vibration impacts, which is helpful; it 

indicates alternative A may impact 1,928 receptors and alternative B may impact, 1,801 receptors. Although 

Appendix B provided some demographic information on Environmental Justice communities (EJ), it was not clear 

whether the alternate B noise impacts were focused in EJ areas. This Tier I document also did not identify 

sensitive receptor locations for noise, such as hospitals and schools. The Tier I EA noted that these receptors 

might be more impacted under a future scenario of 5 round trip trains per day at increased speeds to 90 miles per 

hour (mph). That scenario will be considered in a supplemental Tier I EA evaluation. The present document is 

focused upon the addition of 2 round trip trains per day along an established active corridor, operating at current 

79 mph maximum speeds. At this level of operations, minimal impacts are anticipated. Greater impacts are 

anticipated if and when the service for this corridor upgrades to 5 round trip trains per day with speeds increased 

from Chicago to Wyanet, Illinois to 90 mph. Your Agency proposed that these environmental impacts will be 

discussed in a supplemental Tier I EA. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this Tier I document. We 

request that IDTO provide us with further Tier I and Tier II EA documents for this corridor project. If you have any 

questions on our comments, please contact me or Norm west of my staff, by phone at (312) 353- 5682 or by 

email at west.norman@epa.gov. 

Topic(s): Noise Response: FRA identified its approach for the High-Speed Intercity 

Passenger Rail Program (HSIPR) National Environmental Policy

 Act (NEPA) system level program in the June 17, 2009 

Guidance (74 Fed. Reg. 29900 (June 23, 2009)). The noise 

analysis conducted for this Tier 1 EA was a screening effort to 

determine the relative impacts of each alternative and to 

determine where additional noise analysis may be required. 

The Tier 1 EA was prepared in accordance with recent FRA 

guidance including: Compliance with NEPA in Implementing 

HSIPR (August 13, 2009); Overview of HSIPR NEPA 

Requirements (August 14, 2009), and the June 17, 2009 
28

Guidance (74 Fed. Reg. 29900 (June 23, 2009)).

The noise analysis for Tier 2 Project-level NEPA evaluation will 

be conducted at a more detailed level to determine impacts to 

specific communities (including environmental justice 

communities) and sensitive receptors such as hospitals and 

schools and other noise and vibration sensitive land uses 

identified in FRA guidelines (High-Speed Ground 

Transportation Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment 

(October 2005)). The Tier 2 noise and vibration impact 

assessments will be performed in accordance those guidelines.

US Army Corps of Engineers-Chicago District Comment ID: 105

Leesa Beal, Chief, East Section, Regulatory Branch Date: 10/15/2009

111 N Canal St Comment Letter

Chicago, IL 60606-7206

Comment: This office is in receipt of your August 19, 2009 correspondence requesting the participation of the 

Chicago District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) as a cooperating agency in the review of the 

Tier 1 Service Level Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Chicago to Iowa City Intercity 

Passenger Rail Service project. The Illinois Department of Transportation and Iowa Department of 

transportation, in conjunction with the Federal Railroad Administration, are initiating the information 

gathering phase of the EA for the proposed improvements included in the Chicago to Iowa City 

Intercity Passenger Rail Service Project. The Corps cordially accepts the invitation to participate in 

the collaborative effort among Federal Government, States, railroads and other key stakeholders in 

facilitating the vision of a national network of high-speed rail corridors. According to the EA, Tier 1 will

establish purpose and need, estimate ridership, select the preferred route, identify the station stops,

specify the service levels, define types of operation, and identify the logical next phases. Their 2 will

define specific construction activities which would be evaluated in subsequent Tier 2 NEPA 

documents. The Corps will be required to evaluate the EA in accordance with the policy and 

procedures set forth in the rules governing the regulatory program of the Corps of Engineers, Title 

33 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 320 through part 332, and the policies and procedures 

for implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) at Title 33 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations Part 230. The goal of our review is to conclude that the activity will not have a 

significant adverse effect on the quality of the human environment. As part of the Corps 

requirements, The Tier 2 EA shall address all studies and surveys as required by Federal and state 

governing authorities and shall follow all policies and procedures in identifying aquatic resources and

natural areas within the project corridor. The EA shall also provide an assessment of the direct, 

indirect and cumulative effects that the project may have on federally jurisdictional areas such as 

rivers, streams, wetlands, etc., and if necessary, consider compensation to offset the proposed 

impacts. Please be informed that additional environmental studies and reviews may be required by 

this office once the NEPA/404 Review process is underway and the two proposed alternative site 

configurations are presented for comment. These comments address activities within the Chicago 

District regulated area only which, terminates at the Kane-Kendall County border for Alternative A and

at the Will-Kendall County border for Alternative B. The Corps looks forward to working closely with 

Federal and other lead agencies in completing a comprehensive review of the supporting 

documentation pertaining to the project. If you have any questions, please contact Kathy Chernich of 

my staff by telephone at (312) 846-5531, or email at Kathy.g.chernich@usace.army.mil.

Topic(s): General Comment Response: Comments noted. Coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers will continue in the Tier 2 Project Level NEPA review.

Any required permits will be applied for in the Tier 2 Project 

Level NEPA review process.
Attachments Supplemental Information 

Chicago to Iowa City Intercity Passenger Rail Service August 2010 

Service Level Environmental Assessment 

Attachment 11 

Illinois Natural History Survey, Preliminary Prairie Report 

Memorandum 

Illinois Department of Transportation 

Wyanet Connection 

Between Iowa Interstate Railroad (IAIS) & 

Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad (BNSF) 

in Bureau County, Illinois 

 Prepared by 

Michael J. C. Murphy 

Mapping by 

Janet L. Jarvis

Division of Biodiversity and Ecological Entomology 

 Biotic Surveys Section 

Memorandum to: 

Illinois Department of Transportation 

Bureau of Environment 

2300 South Dirksen Parkway 

 Springfield, Illinois 62764 

 

19 July 2010 

INHS © 1816 S. Oak St. © Champaign, IL 61820 http://www.inhs.uiuc.edu 
INTRODUCTION 

 A request was received in July 2010 for botanical surveys to be conducted within habitats 

occurring in the Wyanet Connection Survey Area, Bureau County, Illinois, with an emphasis on 

any potential high quality prairie remnants. The survey area is located at the point of intersection 

between the Iowa Interstate Railroad (IAIS) and the Burlington Northern Sante Fe Railroad 

(BNSF) slighty southwest of Wyanet, Illinois (Figure 1), and encompasses a total area of 22.21 

ha (54.89 acres). Survey boundaries included areas north of the IAIS railroad and areas 

northwest and southeast of the BNSF railroad (Figure 1). Specific goals of botanical surveys 

were: 1) to search for populations of threatened or endangered plant species within or 

immediately adjacent to survey boundaries – with an emphasis on potential remnant prairie 

habitats, and 2) determine if any high quality natural plant communities were present within the 

study area. 

METHODS 

 Botanical surveys were conducted during two site visits between 6 July 2010 and 14 July 

2010, with the search emphasis on threatened and endangered vascular plant species and/or highquality natural communities. Cumulative species lists were compiled for all community 

types/plant associations encountered, and several dozen plant specimens were collected and 

preserved for laboratory examination with GPS coordinates taken at all collection locations. 

Upon identification of collected specimens, a Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) based on Taft 

et al. (1997) was conducted on any high-quality natural communities occurring in the study area. 

Collected specimens are deposited in the Illinois Natural History Survey Herbarium (ILLS), in 

Champaign, Illinois. Botanical nomenclature follows Taft et al. (1997) and if not specifically 

stated, scientific names followed by an asterisk (*) denote vascular plants that are adventive to 

this region. Community classification and grades of natural quality follow White (1978). 

Grades of natural quality are as follows: 

 Grade A: Relatively stable or undisturbed communities 

 Grade B: Late successional or lightly disturbed communities 

 Grade C: Mid-successional or moderately to heavily disturbed communities 

 Grade D: Early successional or severely disturbed communities 

 Grade E: Very early successional or very severely disturbed communities 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Threatened and Endangered Species

 No threatened or endangered vascular plant species were found within the survey area 

during botanical surveys conducted on the two site visits. 

Community Types

 Community types within the survey area (Figure 1) included four cultural community 

types (communities resulting from human disturbance) and three natural community types, 

which were represented by varying degrees of natural quality. Species lists for all community 

types (with the exception of agricultural land) are provided in Table 1. Natural community types 

1
that still possessed a relatively high degree of natural quality will be discussed in detail in the 

following section, while cultural communities and highly degraded natural communities will be 

discussed only briefly. Community types occurring within the survey area are as follows: 

 Natural Communities Cultural Communities

 - Dry to dry-mesic gravel prairie - Prairie planting 

 - Dry-mesic to wet-mesic prairie - Pastureland 

 - Mesic floodplain forest - Successional forest 

 - Agricultural land 

Community Descriptions 

Dry to dry-mesic gravel prairie:

 Five small remnants of dry to dry-mesic gravel prairie were found within the study area 

(Figure 1), ranging in size from 0.008 ha (0.02 acres) to 0.054 ha (0.13 acres). One of these 

remnants was very high quality (grade B to A-), but small (approximately 0.029 ha [0.07 acres]), 

and occurred immediately southeast of where the IAIS and BNSF railroads intersect (see Figure 

1). The native Floristic Quality Index (FQI) for this remnant was 30.7 (29.0 with adventive 

taxa), which is a relatively high score considering the very small area this remnant occupies. The 

native mean C-value was 4.7 (4.2 with adventive taxa), which also supports the interpretation of 

a remnant community with high natural quality. Species occurring in this remnant as well as 

results of the Floristic Quality Assessment are shown in Table 2. The remaining gravel prairie 

remnants ranged in quality from grade D+ to C (see Figure 1). Species compositions within 

each of these areas were variable, but taxa commonly associated with these habitats included 

(see also Table 1): 

Amorpha canescens Euphorbia corollata Schizachyrium scoparium 

Andropogon gerardii Helianthus rigidus Silphium laciniatum 

Aster ericoides Psoralea tenuiflora Silphium terebinthinaceum 

Bouteloua curtipendula Ratibida pinnata Solidago rigida 

Brickellia eupatorioides Rosa carolina Stipa spartea 

Eupatorium altissimum Ruellia humilis Tradescantia ohiensis 

Other taxa that were indicative of these habitats, but less commonly encountered, included: 

Anemone cylindrica Dalea purpurea Solidago missouriensis 

Asclepias viridiflora Desmodium illinoense Sporobolus heterolepis 

Aster azureus Liatris aspera Triosteum perfoliatum 

Aster laevis Lithospermum canescens Viola pedatifida 

Coreopsis palmata Penstemon pallidus 

Non-native species were common in these habitats, but infestation levels as well as the diversity 

of non-native species varied depending upon disturbance history and the degree of degradation 

having occurred within a given area. Common non-native species of gravel prairie habitats 

included (see also Table 1): 

Bromus inermis Melilotus alba Poa compressa 

Daucus carota Pastinaca sativa Poa pratensis 

2
Dry-mesic to wet-mesic prairie:

 On the western edge of the survey area, remnant prairie habitats ranging from dry-mesic 

to wet-mesic occurred parallel to, and on both the north and south sides of, the IAIS railroad 

(Figure 1). Dry-mesic to wet-mesic prairie remnants represented 1.13 ha (2.79 acres) of the 

survey area. The highest quality remnants of this community type occurred on the north side of 

the IAIS railroad, and these remnant communities continued west along the railroad (approx. 1.6 

km [1 mile]) to CR 1200 E. One small remnant of this community type (approximately 0.14 ha 

[0.35 acres]) that occurred in the survey area (see Figure 1) had very high natural quality 

ranging from grade B to A-. The native FQI for this remnant was 33.8 (31.9 with adventive 

taxa), which again, is a relatively high score considering the very small area this remnant 

occupies. The native mean C-value was 4.6 (4.0 with adventive taxa), which also supports the 

interpretation of a remnant community with high natural quality. Species occurring in this 

remnant as well as FQA results are shown in Table 3. Remaining prairie communities of this 

type within the survey area were grade C to D (Figure 1), but higher quality areas (including 

another grade B to A- section of prairie - see Figure 1) occurred west, and outside of the survey 

area, toward CR 1200 E. 

Species commonly encountered within these habitat types included (see also Table 1): 

Allium canadense Carex tricocarpa Rosa carolina 

Amphicarpa bracteata Equisetum laevigatum Schizachyrium scoparium 

Andropogon gerardii Euphorbia corollata Silphium laciniatum 

Apios americana Euthamia graminifolia Silphium terebinthinaceum 

Apocynum sibiricum Helianthus rigidus Solidago canadensis 

Aster ericoides Heliopsis helianthoides Solidago rigida 

Aster laevis Monarda fistulosa Spartina pectinata 

Aster praealtus Muhlenbergia frondosa Stipa spartea 

Calystegia sepium Pycnanthemum virginianum Tradescantia ohiensis 

Carex lanuginosa Ratibida pinnata Veronicastrum virginianum 

Other taxa that were indicative of these habitats, but less commonly encountered, included: 

Amorpha canescens Desmodium illinoense Lilium michiganense 

Asclepias viridiflora Desmodium sessilifolium Lithospermum canescens 

Bouteloua curtipendula Echinacea pallida Phlox maculata 

Carex emoryi Eryngium yuccifolium Phlox pilosa 

Carex meadii Lespedeza capitata Sporobolus heterolepis 

Dalea candida Liatris cylindracea Symphoricarpos occidentalis 

Dalea purpurea Liatris pycnostachya Zizia aurea 

Several non-native species were commonly encountered in these habitats, and included (see also 

Table 1): 

Agropyron repens Melilotus alba Poa compressa 

Bromus inermis Pastinaca sativa Poa pratensis 

Daucus carota Phalaris arundinacea 

3
Mesic floodplain forest:

 A small amount of mesic floodplain forest (0.86 ha [2.12 acres]) occurred within the 

survey area, and this habitat type was located along Pond Creek (Figure 1). All areas 

representing this community type were highly degraded (grade D-), and infestation levels of 

Lonicera maackii* (amur honeysuckle) were often very high. The ground flora in these areas 

was sparse and the dominant condition was bare soil. Heavy shading from amur honeysuckle as 

well as a dense overstory and understory of Acer negundo (boxelder), Celtis occidentalis

(hackberry), Morus alba* (white mulberry), Prunus serotina (black cherry), Ulmus americana

(American elm), and Ulmus rubra (slippery elm), is a contributing factor to the low diversity in 

these areas (see also Table 1). 

Prairie Planting:

 Approximately 1.39 ha (3.43 acres) of the survey area were represented by prairie 

plantings (Figure 1). Located on the northern boundaries of the survey area, these prairies 

appeared to be old agricultural and/or pastureland areas that had been replanted to prairie in more 

recent years. Much of this community type was dominated by native prairie species, including 

Andropogon gerardii (big bluestem), Monarda fistulosa (wild bergamot), Panicum virgatum

(prairie switch grass), and Ratibida pinnata (yellow coneflower), but also had portions infested 

with, and/or dominated by, non-native species and native ruderal species - these included: 

Ambrosia artemisiifolia (common ragweed), Bromus inermis* (Hungarian brome), Medicago 

sativa* (alfalfa), Melilotus alba* (white sweet clover), Pastinaca sativa* (wild parsnip), and 

Torilis japonica* (Japanese hedge parsley) (see also Table 1). 

Pastureland:

 Located on the northern boundary of the survey area (Figure 1), pastureland represented 

0.26 ha (0.64 acres) of the total survey area. The two dominant species of this community type 

were Hungarian brome* and alfalfa* (see also Table 1). 

Successional Forest:

 Successional forest habitats were prevalent within the survey area (Figure 1), occupying 

4.92 ha (12.15 acres), and representing areas that have been severely degraded. These areas are 

now characterized by very dense growth of native, and to a much greater extent, non-native 

woody species, to the near or complete exclusion of plant species that historically would have 

been present in these habitats. 

Agricultural Land:

 

 Agricultural land represented 10.93 ha (27.02 acres) of the total survey area (Figure 1), 

and at the time surveys were conducted, was planted in either corn (Zea mays) or soybeans 

(Glycine max). 

4
Recommendations

 Due to the high quality condition of several sections of prairie within the survey area, it is 

recommended that further surveys for threatened or endangered species be conducted at different 

times of the growing season (i.e, late summer, autumn, and spring) to account for the phenology 

of different species. Further surveys would also provide additional information with respect to 

the natural quality these remnants still possess. 

5
REFERENCES 

Reed, P. B., Jr. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: north central 

 (region 3). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88(26.3). 

Taft, J. B., G. S. Wilhelm, D. M. Ladd, and L. A. Masters. 1997. Floristic quality 

 assessment for vegetation in Illinois. A method for assessing vegetation integrity. 

 Erigenia 15:3-95. 

White, J. 1978. Illinois natural areas inventory technical report. Vol. 1. Survey methods 

 and results. Illinois Natural Areas Inventory, Urbana. 426 pp. 

6

Agricultural Land

Mesic Floodplain ForestPasture Land

RailroadSuccessional ForestPrairie Planting

PondDry/Dry-Mesic Gravel Prairie (Grade B to A-)Dry/Dry-Mesic Gravel Prairie (Grade C to D+)

Dry-Mesic to Dry-Mesic to Wyanet Conn

0 

125

Figure 1. Plant community types located in the Wyanet Connection Survey Area, Bureau County, Illinois. 

BNSF Railroad

Proposed Track Connection

Table 1. Vascular plant species and corresponding habitats observed in the IDOT Wyanet Connection Survey Area, Bureau 

County, Illinois. Habitat abbreviations are: DMGP = dry/dry-mesic gravel prairie; DMWMP = dry-mesic to wet-mesic prairie; 

MFPF = degraded mesic floodplain forest; PLPR = planted prairie; PL = pastureland; and SF = successional forest. Other 

abbreviations are: C = coefficient of conservatism; W = numeric wetness values for wetland categories (see end of table); 

Wetness = wetland classification category (see end of table); Physiog. = physiognomy (combination of structural attributes, 

life history and taxonomic classification). Single letter prefixes for Forb, Grass, Sedge, or Vine classifications: A = annual, H 

= herbaceous, P = perennial, and W = woody. Scientific names in all capital letters indicate non-native taxa. DMGP DMWMP

M

F

P

F

P

L

P

R

PLSF

C Scientific Name W Wetness Physiog. Common Name

1 Acer negundo -2 FACW- Tree BOXELDER X X X X

0 AGROPYRON REPENS 3 FACU P-Grass QUACK GRASS X

0 Agrostis alba -3 FACW P-Grass RED TOP X

0 ALLIARIA PETIOLATA 0 FAC B-Forb GARLIC MUSTARD X X

2 Allium canadense 3 FACU P-Forb WILD GARLIC X

0 AMARANTHUS RETROFLEXUS 2 FACU+ A-Forb ROUGH PIGWEED X

0 Ambrosia artemisiifolia 3 FACU A-Forb COMMON RAGWEED X X X

0 Ambrosia trifida -1 FAC+ A-Forb GIANT RAGWEED X X X X

8 Amorpha canescens 5 UPL Shrub LEAD PLANT X X

4 Amphicarpa bracteata 0 FAC H-Vine HOG PEANUT X

5 Andropogon gerardii 1 FAC- P-Grass BIG BLUESTEM X X X

4 Anemone canadensis -3 FACW P-Forb MEADOW ANEMONE X X

8 Anemone cylindrica 5 UPL P-Forb CANDLE ANEMONE X

4 Anemone virginiana 5 UPL P-Forb TALL ANEMONE X

3 Apios americana -3 FACW H-Vine GROUND NUT X

2 Apocynum sibiricum -1 FAC+ P-Forb INDIAN HEMP X X X

0 Asclepias syriaca 5 UPL P-Forb COMMON MILKWEED X X X X

9 Asclepias viridiflora 5 UPL P-Forb GREEN MILKWEED X X

0 ASPARAGUS OFFICINALIS 3 FACU P-Forb GARDEN ASPARAGUS X X

7 Aster azureus 5 UPL P-Forb SKY-BLUE ASTER X

4 Aster ericoides 4 FACU- P-Forb HEATH ASTER X X

8 Aster laevis 5 UPL P-Forb SMOOTH BLUE ASTER X X

4 Aster novae-angliae -3 FACW P-Forb NEW ENGLAND ASTER X

0 Aster pilosus 4 FACU- P-Forb HAIRY ASTER X X X X

4 Aster praealtus -5 OBL P-Forb WILLOW ASTER X

3 Aster simplex -5 OBL P-Forb PANICLED ASTER X

7 Astragalus canadensis -1 FAC+ P-Forb CANADIAN MILK VETCH X

1 Bidens frondosa -3 FACW A-Forb COMMON BEGGAR'S TICKS X

7 Bouteloua curtipendula 5 UPL P-Grass SIDE-OATS GRAMA X X

0 BRASSICA NIGRA 5 UPL A-Forb BLACK MUSTARD X X

6 Brickellia eupatorioides 5 UPL P-Forb FALSE BONESET X X

0 BROMUS ARVENSIS 5 UPL P-Grass CHESS X

0 BROMUS INERMIS 5 UPL P-Grass HUNGARIAN BROME X X X

1 Calystegia sepium 0 FAC P-Forb AMERICAN BINDWEED X X X X

4 Campanula americana 0 FAC A-Forb AMERICAN BELLFLOWER X X X

4 Carex aggregata 5 UPL P-Sedge SMOOTH CLUSTERED SEDGE X

4 Carex brevior 0 FAC P-Sedge PLAINS OVAL SEDGE X

6 Carex emoryi -5 OBL P-Sedge RIVERBANK SEDGE X

4 Carex lanuginosa -5 OBL P-Sedge WOOLY SEDGE X

6 Carex meadii 4 FACU- P-Sedge MEAD'S STIFF SEDGE X

5 Carex stricta -5 OBL P-Sedge TUSSOCK SEDGE X

6 Carex trichocarpa -5 OBL P-Sedge HAIRY-FRUITED LAKE SEDGE X

1 Cassia fasciculata 4 FACU- A-Forb GOLDEN CASSIA X

3 Celtis occidentalis 1 FAC- Tree HACKBERRY X X

4 Cicuta maculata -5 OBL B-Forb WATER HEMLOCK X X

3 Cirsium discolor 5 UPL B-Forb PASTURE THISTLE X X

6 Comandra umbellata 3 FACU P-Forb BASTARD TOAD-FLAX X

8
DMGP

DMWMPM

F

P

F

P

L

P

R

Table 1 continued

PLSF

C Scientific Name W Wetness Physiog. Common Name

0 COMMELINA COMMUNIS 0 FAC A-Forb COMMON DAY FLOWER X

0 Conyza canadensis 1 FAC- A-Forb HORSEWEED X X X

6 Coreopsis palmata 5 UPL P-Forb PRAIRIE COREOPSIS X X

2 Cornus drummondii 0 FAC Shrub ROUGH-LEAVED DOGWOOD X X

1 Cryptotaenia canadensis 0 FAC P-Forb HONEWORT X X

2 Cuscuta gronovii -3 FACW A-Forb COMMON DODDER X

0 DACTYLIS GLOMERATA 3 FACU P-Grass ORCHARD GRASS X X

9 Dalea candida 5 UPL P-Forb WHITE PRAIRIE CLOVER X

8 Dalea purpurea 5 UPL P-Forb PURPLE PRAIRIE CLOVER X X

0 DAUCUS CAROTA 4 FACU- B-Forb QUEEN ANNE'S LACE X X X X

5 Desmodium illinoense 5 UPL P-Forb ILLINOIS TICK TREFOIL X X

6 Desmodium sessilifolium 5 UPL P-Forb SESSILE-LEAVED TICKTREFOIL X

7 Echinacea pallida 5 UPL P-Forb PALE PURPLE CONEFLOWER X X

4 Elymus canadensis 1 FAC- P-Grass CANADA WILD RYE X

4 Elymus virginicus -2 FACW- P-Grass VIRGINIA WILD RYE X X

0 Equisetum arvense 0 FAC Fern COMMON HORSETAIL X X

4 Equisetum laevigatum -3 FACW Fern SMOOTH SCOURING RUSH X X

2 Erigeron strigosus 1 FAC- P-Forb DAISY FLEABANE X X X

7 Eryngium yuccifolium -1 FAC+ P-Forb RATTLESNAKE MASTER X

2 Eupatorium altissimum 3 FACU P-Forb TALL BONESET X X

2 Eupatorium rugosum 3 FACU P-Forb WHITE SNAKEROOT X X

3 Euphorbia corollata 5 UPL P-Forb FLOWERING SPURGE X X

3 Euthamia graminifolia -2 FACW- P-Forb GRASS-LEAVED GOLDENROD X

0 FESTUCA ARUNDINACEA 2 FACU+ P-Grass TALL FESCUE X X

2 Fragaria virginiana 1 FAC- P-Forb WILD STRAWBERRY X X

4 Galium triflorum 2 FACU+ P-Forb SWEET-SCENTED BEDSTRAW X X

2 Geum canadense 0 FAC P-Forb WHITE AVENS X X

2 Gleditsia triacanthos 0 FAC Tree HONEY LOCUST X X

1 Hackelia virginiana 1 FAC- P-Forb STICKSEED X X

2 Helianthus grosseserratus -2 FACW- P-Forb SAWTOOTH SUNFLOWER X

5 Helianthus hirsutus 5 UPL P-Forb BRISTLY SUNFLOWER X

6 Helianthus rigidus 5 UPL P-Forb PRAIRIE SUNFLOWER X X

3 Helianthus tuberosus 0 FAC P-Forb JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE X

4 Heliopsis helianthoides 5 UPL P-Forb FALSE SUNFLOWER X X

2 Impatiens capensis -3 FACW A-Forb SPOTTED TOUCH-ME-NOT X X X

4 Juglans nigra 3 FACU Tree BLACK WALNUT X X

1 Juniperus virginiana 3 FACU Tree EASTERN RED CEDAR X X

1 Lactuca canadensis 2 FACU+ B-Forb WILD LETTUCE X X

0 LACTUCA SERRIOLA 0 FAC B-Forb PRICKLY LETTUCE X

4 Lespedeza capitata 3 FACU P-Forb ROUND-HEADED BUSH CLOVER X

7 Liatris aspera 5 UPL P-Forb ROUGH BLAZING STAR X X

8 Liatris cylindracea 5 UPL P-Forb CYLINDRICAL BLAZING STAR X

6 Liatris pycnostachya 1 FAC- P-Forb PRAIRIE BLAZINE STAR X

6 Lilium michiganense -1 FAC+ P-Forb MICHIGAN LILY X

6 Lithospermum canescens 5 UPL P-Forb HOARY PUCCOON X

0 LONICERA MAACKII 5 UPL Shrub AMUR HONEYSUCKLE X X X X

3 Lycopus americanus -5 OBL P-Forb COMMON WATER HOREHOUND X

5 Lythrum alatum -5 OBL P-Forb WINGED LOOSESTRIFE X

3 Malus ioensis 5 UPL Tree IOWA CRAB X

0 MEDICAGO LUPULINA 1 FAC- A-Forb BLACK MEDICK X X

0 MEDICAGO SATIVA 5 UPL P-Forb ALFALFA X X

0 MELILOTUS ALBA 3 FACU B-Forb WHITE SWEET CLOVER X X X X

4 Menispermum canadense -1 FAC+ W-Vine MOONSEED X X

0 MIRABILIS NYCTAGINEA 5 UPL P-Forb WILD FOUR O'CLOCK X

4 Monarda fistulosa 3 FACU P-Forb WILD BERGAMOT X X

9
DMGP

DMWMPM

F

P

F

P

L

P

R

Table 1 continued

PLSF

C Scientific Name W Wetness Physiog. Common Name

0 MORUS ALBA 0 FAC Tree WHITE MULBERRY X X

3 Muhlenbergia frondosa -3 FACW P-Grass COMMON SATIN GRASS X

0 NEPETA CATARIA 1 FAC- P-Forb CATNIP X

10 Onosmodium molle 5 UPL P-Forb DOWNY MARBLESEED X

3 Osmorhiza longistylis 4 FACU- P-Forb ANISE ROOT X X

3 Panicum oligosanthes v. scribnerianum 3 FACU P-Grass SCRIBNER'S PANIC GRASS X X

4 Panicum virgatum -1 FAC+ P-Grass PRAIRIE SWITCH GRASS X X

2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia 1 FAC- W-Vine VIRGINIA CREEPER X X X X

0 PASTINACA SATIVA 5 UPL B-Forb WILD PARSNIP X X X

6 Penstemon pallidus 5 UPL P-Forb PALE BEARD TONGUE X

0 PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA -4 FACW+ P-Grass REED CANARY GRASS X X

0 PHLEUM PRATENSE 3 FACU P-Grass TIMOTHY X X

10 Phlox maculata -5 OBL P-Forb WILD SWEET WILLIAM X

7 Phlox pilosa 1 FAC- P-Forb SAND PRAIRIE PHLOX X

1 Phragmites australis -4 FACW+ P-Grass COMMON REED X

4 Phryma leptostachya 5 UPL P-Forb LOPSEED X X X

2 Physalis heterophylla 5 UPL P-Forb CLAMMY GROUND CHERRY X

0 Physalis subglabrata 5 UPL P-Forb SMOOTH GROUND CHERRY X

1 Phytolacca americana 1 FAC- P-Forb POKEWEED X X

3 Pilea pumila -3 FACW A-Forb CANADA CLEARWEED X X

0 POA COMPRESSA 2 FACU+ P-Grass CANADIAN BLUE GRASS X X X

0 POA PRATENSIS 1 FAC- P-Grass KENTUCKY BLUE GRASS X X X X

2 Polygonum scandens 0 FAC H-Vine CLIMBING FALSE BUCKWHEAT X X

2 Populus deltoides -1 FAC+ Tree EASTERN COTTONWOOD X X

3 Prunus americana 5 UPL Tree AMERICAN PLUM X

1 Prunus serotina 3 FACU Tree WILD BLACK CHERRY X X X X

8 Psoralea tenuiflora 5 UPL P-Forb SCURFY-PEA X

5 Pycnanthemum virginianum -4 FACW+ P-Forb COMMON MOUNTAIN MINT X

5 Quercus macrocarpa 1 FAC- Tree BURR OAK X

4 Ranunculus septentrionalis -4 FACW+ P-Forb SWAMP BUTTERCUP X

4 Ratibida pinnata 5 UPL P-Forb YELLOW CONEFLOWER X X X

1 Rhus glabra 5 UPL Shrub SMOOTH SUMAC X X X

2 Ribes missouriense 5 UPL Shrub MISSOURI GOOSEBERRY X X

4 Rosa carolina 4 FACU- Shrub PASTURE ROSE X X

2 Rubus occidentalis 3 FACU Shrub BLACK RASPBERRY X X X

2 Rubus pensylvanicus 1 FAC- Shrub YANKEE BLACKBERRY X X X X

2 Rudbeckia hirta 3 FACU P-Forb BLACK-EYED SUSAN X X X

3 Ruellia humilis 4 FACU- P-Forb HAIRY RUELLIA X X

0 RUMEX CRISPUS -1 FAC+ P-Forb CURLY DOCK X

4 Sagittaria latifolia -5 OBL P-Forb COMMON ARROWHEAD X

1 Salix exigua -5 OBL Shrub SANDBAR WILLOW X

2 Sambucus canadensis 4 FACU- Shrub COMMON ELDER X X

0 SAPONARIA OFFICINALIS 3 FACU P-Forb BOUNCING BET X

5 Schizachyrium scoparium 4 FACU- P-Grass LITTLE BLUESTEM X X X

6 Senecio plattensis 4 FACU- P-Forb PRAIRIE RAGWORT X

6 Silene stellata 5 UPL P-Forb STARRY CAMPION X

5 Silphium integrifolium 5 UPL P-Forb ROSIN WEED X

5 Silphium laciniatum 4 FACU- P-Forb COMPASS PLANT X X

4 Silphium perfoliatum -2 FACW- P-Forb CUP PLANT X

4 Silphium terebinthinaceum 1 FAC- P-Forb PRAIRIE DOCK X X

3 Smilax hispida 0 FAC W-Vine BRISTLY GREEN BRIER X

4 Smilax lasioneuron 5 UPL H-Vine COMMON CARRION FLOWER X

0 Solanum carolinense 4 FACU- P-Forb HORSE NETTLE X

1 Solidago canadensis 3 FACU P-Forb CANADA GOLDENROD X X X

3 Solidago gigantea -3 FACW P-Forb LATE GOLDENROD X X X

10
Table 1 continued

DMGPDMWMPM

F

P

F

P

L

P

R

Table 1 continued

PLSF

C Scientific Name W Wetness Physiog. Common Name

4 Solidago missouriensis 5 UPL P-Forb MISSOURI GOLDENROD X

4 Solidago rigida 4 FACU- P-Forb RIGID GOLDENROD X X

4 Spartina pectinata -4 FACW+ P-Grass PRAIRIE CORD GRASS X

9 Sporobolus heterolepis 4 FACU- P-Grass NORTHERN DROP SEED X X

5 Stachys palustris -5 OBL P-Forb WOUNDWORT X

6 Stipa spartea 5 UPL P-Grass PORCUPINE GRASS X X

6 Symphoricarpos occidentalis 5 UPL Shrub WOLFBERRY X

3 Teucrium canadense v. virginicum -2 FACW- P-Forb AMERICAN GERMANDER X X

5 Thalictrum dasycarpum v. hypoglaucum -2 FACW- P-Forb SMOOTH MEADOW RUE X

5 Tilia americana 3 FACU Tree AMERICAN LINDEN X

0 TORILIS JAPONICA 5 UPL A-Forb JAPANESE HEDGE PARSLEY X

1 Toxicodendron radicans 3 FACU W-Vine POISON IVY X X X X X

3 Tradescantia ohiensis 2 FACU+ P-Forb COMMON SPIDERWORT X X

0 TRAGOPOGON PRATENSIS 5 UPL B-Forb COMMON GOAT'S BEARD X

0 TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE 2 FACU+ P-Forb RED CLOVER X

5 Triosteum perfoliatum 5 UPL P-Forb LATE HORSE GENTIAN X X

5 Ulmus americana -2 FACW- Tree AMERICAN ELM X X

3 Ulmus rubra 0 FAC Tree SLIPPERY ELM X X

2 Urtica dioica -1 FAC+ P-Forb TALL NETTLE X X X

0 VERBASCUM THAPSUS 5 UPL B-Forb WOOLLY MULLEIN X X X

2 Verbena stricta 5 UPL P-Forb HOARY VERVAIN X

3 Verbena urticifolia -1 FAC+ P-Forb WHITE VERVIAN X X X X

6 Veronicastrum virginicum 0 FAC P-Forb CULVER'S ROOT X

0 VIBURNUM OPULUS 0 FAC Shrub EUROPEAN BUSH CRANBERRY X

9 Viola pedatifida 4 FACU- P-Forb PRAIRIE VIOLET X

2 Vitis riparia -2 FACW- W-Vine RIVERBANK GRAPE X X X X

6 Zizia aurea -1 FAC+ P-Forb GOLDEN ALEXANDERS X

Wetland classification categories follow Reed (1988) for Region 3. Further 

details are from Taft et al. (1997). Plants are placed within one of five wetland 

indicator categories: Obligate Wetland (OBL), Facultative Wetland (FACW), 

Facultative (FAC), Facultative Upland (FACU), and Upland (UPL). Within 

any of these five categories, a “+” indicates that a particular taxon has a greater 

tendency to occur in wetlands while a “-” indicates a lesser tendency. 

Following this, indicator status categories, in descending order of probability 

of occurrence in wetland habitat, would be: 

-5 Obligate Wetland (OBL) 

-4 Facultative Wetland + (FACW+) 

-3 Facultative Wetland (FACW) 

-2 Facultative Wetland - (FACW-) 

-1 Facultative + (FAC+) 

0 Facultative (FAC) 

+1 Facultative - (FAC-) 

+2 Facultative Upland + (FACU+) 

+3 Facultative Upland (FACU) 

+4 Facultative Upland - (FACU-) 

+5 Upland (UPL) 

11
C Scientific Name Physiognomy Common Name

8 Amorpha canescens Shrub LEAD PLANT

5 Andropogon gerardii P-Grass BIG BLUESTEM

8 Anemone cylindrica P-Forb CANDLE ANEMONE

9 Asclepias viridiflora P-Forb GREEN MILKWEED

7 Aster azureus P-Forb SKY-BLUE ASTER

4 Aster ericoides P-Forb HEATH ASTER

8 Aster laevis P-Forb SMOOTH BLUE ASTER

7 Bouteloua curtipendula P-Grass SIDE-OATS GRAMA

6 Brickellia eupatorioides P-Forb FALSE BONESET

0 BROMUS INERMIS P-Grass HUNGARIAN BROME

3 Cirsium discolor B-Forb PASTURE THISTLE

2 Cornus drummondii Shrub ROUGH-LEAVED DOGWOOD

8 Dalea purpurea P-Forb PURPLE PRAIRIE CLOVER

0 DAUCUS CAROTA B-Forb QUEEN ANNE'S LACE

7 Echinacea pallida P-Forb PALE PURPLE CONEFLOWER

4 Equisetum laevigatum Fern SMOOTH SCOURING RUSH

2 Erigeron strigosus P-Forb DAISY FLEABANE

2 Eupatorium altissimum P-Forb TALL BONESET

3 Euphorbia corollata P-Forb FLOWERING SPURGE

5 Helianthus hirsutus P-Forb BRISTLY SUNFLOWER

6 Helianthus rigidus P-Forb PRAIRIE SUNFLOWER

1 Juniperus virginiana Tree EASTERN RED CEDAR

1 Lactuca canadensis B-Forb WILD LETTUCE

7 Liatris aspera P-Forb ROUGH BLAZING STAR

3 Malus ioensis Tree IOWA CRAB

0 MELILOTUS ALBA B-Forb WHITE SWEET CLOVER

10 Onosmodium molle P-Forb DOWNY MARBLESEED

3 Panicum oligosanthes v. scribnerianum P-Grass SCRIBNER'S PANIC GRASS

0 PASTINACA SATIVA B-Forb WILD PARSNIP

6 Penstemon pallidus P-Forb PALE BEARD TONGUE

0 POA COMPRESSA P-Grass CANADIAN BLUE GRASS

8 Psoralea tenuiflora P-Forb SCURFY-PEA

4 Ratibida pinnata P-Forb YELLOW CONEFLOWER

1 Rhus glabra Shrub SMOOTH SUMAC

 Fern 1 2.1% 

Table 2. Vascular plant species occurring at a grade B to A- remnant gravel prairie within the IDOT Wyanet 

Connection Survey Area, Bureau County, IL, and results of corresponding Floristic Quality Assessment. C = 

coefficient of conservatism; Physiognomy = (combination of structural attributes, life history and taxonomic 

classification). Single letter prefixes accompanying Forb, Grass, Sedge, or Vine classifications are as follows: A = 

annual, H = herbaceous, P = perennial, and W = woody. Taxa with scientific names in all capital letters are 

adventive to the region. 

 3.4 W/Adventives P-Grass 6 12.5% P-Grass 2 4.2% 

 AVG: Fac. Upland A-Grass 0 0.0% A-Grass 0 0.0% 

 P-Sedge 0 0.0% P-Sedge 0 0.0% 

 A-Sedge 0 0.0% A-Sedge 0 0.0% 

 4.2 W/Adventives H-Vine 0 0.0% H-Vine 0 0.0% 

 30.7 NATIVE FQI P-Forb 26 54.2% P-Forb 0 0.0% 

 29.0 W/Adventives B-Forb 2 4.2% B-Forb 3 6.3% 

 3.4 NATIVE MEAN W A-Forb 0 0.0% A-Forb 0 0.0% 

 FLORISTIC QUALITY DATA Native 43 89.6% Adventive 5 10.4% 

 43 NATIVE SPECIES Tree 2 4.2% Tree 0 0.0% 

 48 Total Species Shrub 4 8.3% Shrub 0 0.0% 

 4.7 NATIVE MEAN C W-Vine 2 4.2% W-Vine 0 0.0% 

12
C Scientific Name Physiognomy Common Name

4 Rosa carolina Shrub PASTURE ROSE

5 Schizachyrium scoparium P-Grass LITTLE BLUESTEM

6 Senecio plattensis P-Forb PRAIRIE RAGWORT

4 Silphium terebinthinaceum P-Forb PRAIRIE DOCK

1 Solidago canadensis P-Forb CANADA GOLDENROD

3 Solidago gigantea P-Forb LATE GOLDENROD

4 Solidago rigida P-Forb RIGID GOLDENROD

9 Sporobolus heterolepis P-Grass NORTHERN DROP SEED

6 Stipa spartea P-Grass PORCUPINE GRASS

3 Teucrium canadense v. virginicum P-Forb AMERICAN GERMANDER

1 Toxicodendron radicans W-Vine POISON IVY

3 Tradescantia ohiensis P-Forb COMMON SPIDERWORT

2 Verbena stricta P-Forb HOARY VERVAIN

2 Vitis riparia W-Vine RIVERBANK GRAPE

Table 2 continued

13
C Scientific Name Physiognomy Common Name

0 AGROPYRON REPENS P-Grass QUACK GRASS

2 Allium canadense P-Forb WILD GARLIC

8 Amorpha canescens Shrub LEAD PLANT

4 Amphicarpa bracteata H-Vine HOG PEANUT

5 Andropogon gerardii P-Grass BIG BLUESTEM

4 Anemone canadensis P-Forb MEADOW ANEMONE

0 Asclepias syriaca P-Forb COMMON MILKWEED

4 Aster ericoides P-Forb HEATH ASTER

8 Aster laevis P-Forb SMOOTH BLUE ASTER

4 Aster praealtus P-Forb WILLOW ASTER

7 Bouteloua curtipendula P-Grass SIDE-OATS GRAMA

6 Brickellia eupatorioides P-Forb FALSE BONESET

0 BROMUS INERMIS P-Grass HUNGARIAN BROME

6 Carex emoryi P-Sedge RIVERBANK SEDGE

4 Carex lanuginosa P-Sedge WOOLY SEDGE

6 Carex meadii P-Sedge MEAD'S STIFF SEDGE

6 Carex trichocarpa P-Sedge HAIRY-FRUITED LAKE SEDGE

3 Cirsium discolor B-Forb PASTURE THISTLE

6 Comandra umbellata P-Forb BASTARD TOAD-FLAX

6 Coreopsis palmata P-Forb PRAIRIE COREOPSIS

8 Dalea purpurea P-Forb PURPLE PRAIRIE CLOVER

5 Desmodium illinoense P-Forb ILLINOIS TICK TREFOIL

6 Desmodium sessilifolium P-Forb SESSILE-LEAVED TICKTREFOIL

7 Echinacea pallida P-Forb PALE PURPLE CONEFLOWER

4 Elymus canadensis P-Grass CANADA WILD RYE

4 Equisetum laevigatum Fern SMOOTH SCOURING RUSH

7 Eryngium yuccifolium P-Forb RATTLESNAKE MASTER

3 Euphorbia corollata P-Forb FLOWERING SPURGE

3 Euthamia graminifolia P-Forb GRASS-LEAVED GOLDENROD

2 Fragaria virginiana P-Forb WILD STRAWBERRY

6 Galium tinctorium P-Forb STIFF BEDSTRAW

6 Helianthus rigidus P-Forb PRAIRIE SUNFLOWER

3 Helianthus tuberosus P-Forb JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE

4 Heliopsis helianthoides P-Forb FALSE SUNFLOWER

1 Lactuca canadensis B-Forb WILD LETTUCE

7 Liatris aspera P-Forb ROUGH BLAZING STAR

 Fern 1 1.6% 

Table 3. Vascular plant species occurring at a grade B to A- remnant dry-mesic to wet-mesic prairie within the 

IDOT Wyanet Connection Survey Area, Bureau County, IL, and results of corresponding Floristic Quality 

Assessment. C = coefficient of conservatism; Physiognomy = (combination of structural attributes, life history and 

taxonomic classification). Single letter prefixes accompanying Forb, Grass, Sedge, or Vine classifications are as 

follows: A = annual, H = herbaceous, P = perennial, and W = woody. Taxa with scientific names in all capital 

letters are adventive to the region. 

 2.3 W/Adventives P-Grass 8 12.9% P-Grass 4 6.5% 

 AVG: Fac. Upland (+) A-Grass 0 0.0% A-Grass 0 0.0% 

 P-Sedge 4 6.5% P-Sedge 0 0.0% 

 A-Sedge 0 0.0% A-Sedge 0 0.0% 

 4.0 W/Adventives H-Vine 2 3.2% H-Vine 0 0.0% 

 33.8 NATIVE FQI P-Forb 34 54.8% P-Forb 0 0.0% 

 31.9 W/Adventives B-Forb 2 3.2% B-Forb 3 4.8% 

 2.1 NATIVE MEAN W A-Forb 0 0.0% A-Forb 0 0.0% 

 FLORISTIC QUALITY DATA Native 55 88.7% Adventive 7 11.3% 

 55 NATIVE SPECIES Tree 0 0.0% Tree 0 0.0% 

 62 Total Species Shrub 3 4.8% Shrub 0 0.0% 

 4.6 NATIVE MEAN C W-Vine 1 1.6% W-Vine 0 0.0% 

14
C Scientific Name Physiognomy Common Name

8 Liatris cylindracea P-Forb CYLINDRICAL BLAZING STAR

6 Lithospermum canescens P-Forb HOARY PUCCOON

0 MELILOTUS ALBA B-Forb WHITE SWEET CLOVER

4 Monarda fistulosa P-Forb WILD BERGAMOT

3 Panicum oligosanthes v. scribnerianum P-Grass SCRIBNER'S PANIC GRASS

6 Panicum rigidulum P-Grass MUNRO GRASS

0 PASTINACA SATIVA B-Forb WILD PARSNIP

0 POA COMPRESSA P-Grass CANADIAN BLUE GRASS

0 POA PRATENSIS P-Grass KENTUCKY BLUE GRASS

4 Ratibida pinnata P-Forb YELLOW CONEFLOWER

4 Rosa carolina Shrub PASTURE ROSE

2 Rubus occidentalis Shrub BLACK RASPBERRY

3 Ruellia humilis P-Forb HAIRY RUELLIA

5 Schizachyrium scoparium P-Grass LITTLE BLUESTEM

5 Silphium integrifolium P-Forb ROSIN WEED

5 Silphium laciniatum P-Forb COMPASS PLANT

4 Silphium terebinthinaceum P-Forb PRAIRIE DOCK

4 Smilax lasioneuron H-Vine COMMON CARRION FLOWER

1 Solidago canadensis P-Forb CANADA GOLDENROD

4 Solidago rigida P-Forb RIGID GOLDENROD

4 Spartina pectinata P-Grass PRAIRIE CORD GRASS

6 Stipa spartea P-Grass PORCUPINE GRASS

3 Tradescantia ohiensis P-Forb COMMON SPIDERWORT

0 TRAGOPOGON PRATENSIS B-Forb COMMON GOAT'S BEARD

3 Viola sororia P-Forb WOOLY BLUE VIOLET

2 Vitis riparia W-Vine RIVERBANK GRAPE

Table 3 continued

15