alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# International space year 1992 love your planet

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  International space year 1992 love your planet 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  151 × 41 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  index.cpd 

Part of: International space year 1992 love your planet (2 objects)     Next

International space year 1992 love your planet

International space year 1992 love your planet

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Has saving energy brought your family closer together? install a solar or heat pump water heating system, and soak up some savings

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Has saving energy brought your family closer together? install a solar or heat pump water heating system, and soak up some savings 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of Energy 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  150 × 66 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  56478754.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
California High-Speed Rail Authority 

Fresno to Bakersfield 

Section 

Draft Supplemental 

Environmental Impact 

Report/Environmental 

Impact Statement 

Appendix 3.4-A 

Noise and Vibration 

November 2017 
Appendix 3.4-A 

Noise and Vibration 

November 2017 California High-Speed Rail Authority 

Fresno to Bakersfield Section 

Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS 

This page intentionally left blank 
Appendix 3.4-A 

Noise and Vibration 

California High-Speed Rail Authority November 2017 

Fresno to Bakersfield Section Page | 3.4-A-1 

Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS 

APPENDIX 3.4-A: NOISE AND VIBRATION 

A number of technical appendices included as part of the Fresno to Bakersfield Section Final 

Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) have not been 

recreated for the purposes of this Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS because the information contained 

within the technical appendix would remain applicable to the F-B LGA. Appendix 3.4-A did not 

require an update for the F-B LGA analysis and therefore is not included in Volume II of the 

Fresno to Bakersfield Section Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS. To review the appendix in its entirety, 

please refer to the Authority’s Final EIR/EIS: Fresno to Bakersfield website. 
Appendix 3.4-A 

Noise and Vibration 

November 2017 California High-Speed Rail Authority 

3.4-A-2 | Page Fresno to Bakersfield Section 

Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS 

This page intentionally left blank
July 14, 2015

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin

Regional Administrator (3RAOO)U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Region Ill

1650 Arch Sired

Philadelphia PA 19103-2023

Dear Mr. Garvin:

Pursuant to section 181 (aX5) of the Clean Air Act this is a request for a I —year attainment dale

extension to July 20, 2016’ for (the District, Maryland, Virginia) portion of the Washington, DC—MD—

VA ozone nonattainment area, which is classified as marginal for the 2008 8—hour ozone national

ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). By this letter, I am certifying that:

I) The (Washington, DC, State of Maryland, Commonwealth of Virginia) has complied with all

requirements anti commitments pertaining to the area in the applicable ozone implementation

plan; and

2) The Washington, DC-MD-VA 2008 ozone NAAQS nonaitainment area’s fourth-highest daily

maximum 8-hour average monitored ‘a1ue during the 2014 ozone season is 0.075 ppm or less.

Attached is the letter certifying that our ozone data in the Air Quality System is complete,

quality-assured amhient air quality monitoring data for the attainment year 2014 ozone season.

Maryland would appreciate your taking action on this request as soon as possible. If you would like to

discuss this further please call meat 410-537-3255.

Sincerely,

George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., Director

Air and Radiation Management Administration

Attachment

Although the final implementation of the 2008 National Ambient Air OuaIty Standards for Ozone: Nonattatnment Area Classilcations Approach,

Attainment Deadines and Revocaton o the 1997 Ozone Standards for Transportation Conformity Purposes’ tile (77 FR 30160) se tie attainment date

as December 3l of the attainment year (2015 for marginal areas), on December 23, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of

Columbia Circuit vacated this portion of the regulations. Therefore, Lonsisient with the Phase 1 rule for implementation of the 1997 ozone NAAOSattainment bmeframes run from the date that are designations and nonattainment classifications (by operation of law) became effective.

. a a

Recycled Pziper www.mde.maryland.gov rr Users l-&lfl-735-225N

via Maryland Relay Service
FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION

Chicago to St. Louis High-Speed Rail Program
Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement
Tier 2 Evaluation of Springfield Rail Improvements Project

Prepared by
U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration
and
Illinois Department of Transportation

Cooperating Agencies

Federal Highway Administration Illinois Historic Preservation Agency
USS. Fish and Wildlife Service Illinois Department of Agriculture
USS. Army Corps of Engineers Minois Department of Natural Resources

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5
Pursuant to:

National Environmental Policy Act (42 USC § 4332 et seq.), and implementing regulations (40 CFR Parts
1500-1508), 64 FR 28545, 23 CFR § 771, 49 USC § 303(formerly Department of Transportation Act of 1966,
Section 4(f)); National Historic Preservation Act (16 USC § 470); Clean Air Act as amended (42 USC §§
7401 et seq. and 40 CFR Parts 51 and 93); the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 USC § 1531-1544); the
Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1251-1387); and the Uniform Relecation Assistance and Real Property

Date of Approval ~ A
lolzafia bur Dhawcde

Date of Approval for IDOT

The following persons may be contacted for additional information concerning this document:

Ms. Andréa Martin Mr. Joseph E. Shacter

USDOT Federal Railroad Administration Director, Division of Public and Intermodal

1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E., Mail Stop 20 Illinois Department of Transportation

Washington, DC 20590 100 West Randolph Street, Suite 6-600

Phone: (202) 493-6201 Chicago, Illinois 60601-3229

Phone: (312) 793-2116

This Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) evaluates High-Speed Rail (HSR) service
improvements in the 280-mile Chicago to St. Louis Corridor in Cook, Will, Grundy, Livingston, McLean,
Logan, Sangamon, Macoupin, Jersey, Madison, and St. Clair counties in Ilinois and in St. Louis County in
Missouri. No-Build and high-speed rail improvement alternatives are evaluated. Build Alternatives would
reduce passenger rail travel times, improve service reliability, increase frequency of trips, and increase
capacity and safety for passenger and freight trains. For the Tier 1 Final EIS, the Preferred Alternatives are
Alternatives C and D, which will utilize the Northeast Iinois Regional Commuter (NIRC) Rock Island
District (RID) route between Chicago and Joliet and the existing Amtrak route from Joliet to St. Louis, with
the exception of the portion of the corridor through Springfield. A Tier 2 Evaluation of the Springfield Rail
Improvements Project in Sangamon County, Illinois is also included in this EIS. Relocating the Union Pacific
corridor to 10% Street (Alternative 2A) is the Preferred Alternative through Springfield.
Docket No. FAA-2015-8134 Dir. ID 2014-NM-256-AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 12/16/14

Regional Airline Association

12/16/14

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 12/16/14

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 12/16/14
Letter from Aidman Piser & Company, P.A.



 Exhibit 10.31 
 August 14, 2008 
 Securities and Exchange Commission 
 100 F Street, NE 
 Washington, DC 20549 
 Dear Ladies
and Gentlemen: 
 We are the former independent registered public accounting firm for Stem Cell Therapy International, Inc. (the “Company”). We have
read the Company’s disclosure set forth in Item 4.01 “Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant” of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated August 14, 2008 (the “Current Report”) and are in
agreement with the disclosure in the Current Report, insofar as it pertains to our firm. 
 Sincerely, 
 /s/ Aidman, Piser & Company, P.A.
#### Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6702.

Entry No. 746316.

Invoice dated Tunstall, England, March. 4, 1942.

Certified March 5, 1942.

Entered at New York, N. Y., April 8, 1942.

(Decided January 6, 1947)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S, King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
J~~1E0 S7ql~S

C o Q

0 < pA01E~~\2 

### NOV 2 2 19%

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION Mr. David T. Deal American PetroleumInstitute 1220 L St., N.W

. Washington, D

.C. 20005-4070 Dear Dave: Thank you for your letter of November 13, describing API's concerns about the refinery modeling being undertaken by the Department of Energy (DOE) on behalfof EPAin connection with our consideration ofAPI's petition on the Phase II RFG NOx standard. We and DOE would be happy to meet with you at this time to discuss API's concerns, as your letter requests, although DOE's modeling and analysis are still in progress . As you know, in response to API's needs, we are committed to completing our consideration ofthe API petition by the end ofthis year. Another option, that you discussed when we met on November 19, would be to schedule a meeting when DOE has released a draft ofits complet :, modeling results. A meeting shortly following the release ofthe draft could provide an opportunity for you to ask clarifying questions that would assist in your review ofthe refinery cost modeling results. DOE is currently expecting to conclude its analysis on December 13, which would mean that a draft report should be available for release on December 16 . We could schedule a meeting as early as Monday, December 23. The purpose ofthe meeting would be to provide an explanation ofthe information contained in the DOE report and answer questions that arise in your preliminary review . This meeting would include all interested parties; all ofthe organizations that submitted public comments on the API petition would be invited to attend. We would allow25 days fromthat meeting for written comments to be submitted to EPA (i .e., until January 17, 1997) . Those comments could include the issues you raised in your November 13 letter, ifthey remain of concern, and any additional issues that arise fromreviewof DOE's report. EPA would study the submissions fromall ofthe commenters, incorporate them into its response, and attempt to complete its response within 45 days, by March 3, 1997. 

# 1 ~- UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

Recycled/Recyclable . Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100%Recycled Paper (40~o Postconsurner)-2-

Our concern is that this option extends the decision beyond the end of 1996 ; however, you indicated that it may be preferable as it would permit member companies an opportunity to comment on DOE's analysis prior to a final decision by EPA on the API petition. I look forward to hearing from you on this issue. Please respond in writing. Sincerely,

Charles N

. Freed Director Fuels and Energy Division cc: Barry McNutt, DOE
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL AND EXECUTIVE FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Southern Growth Corporation, (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: October 4, 2011



/s/ Joseph Rozelle

Joseph Rozelle

President

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Case No. 13,300.

#### STANWOOD v. FORDYCE.

[See Case No. 15,130.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-Q FOR THE PERIODS ENDED JULY 5, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-05-1998             JUL-05-1998
<CASH>                                          60,254                  21,147
<SECURITIES>                                    51,692                  66,268
<RECEIVABLES>                                  325,927                 404,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (41,177)                (28,097)
<INVENTORY>                                    429,919                 436,324
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               877,723                 947,364
<PP&E>                                       1,106,863               1,134,469
<DEPRECIATION>                                 520,737                 533,080
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,136,321               2,282,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          406,129                 432,751
<BONDS>                                        585,831                 692,284
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                   5,673
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,024,005               1,038,087
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,136,321               2,282,235
<SALES>                                        544,508               1,097,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               544,508               1,097,678
<CGS>                                          383,412                 768,269
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  486,427                 970,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (6,598)                 (8,498)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,927                  23,307
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,752                 112,637
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,449                  33,791
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,303                  78,846
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,303                  78,846
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.66                    1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65                    1.38


</TABLE>
# C_2007199EN.01004202.xml

| 25.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/42

---

Action brought on 22 June 2007 — Imperial Chemical Industries v OHIM (LIGHT & SPACE)

(Case T-224/07)

(2007/C 199/80)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Imperial Chemical Industries plc (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, and V. Chandler, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | The decision of the First Board of Appeal dated 30 March 2007 in Case R 1631/2006-1 shall be annulled. |
| --- | --- |

—

The decision of the First Board of Appeal dated 30 March 2007 in Case R 1631/2006-1 shall be annulled.

| — | The Office shall bear its own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Office shall bear its own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘LIGHT & SPACE’ for goods in class 2 — application No 5 147 756

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refusal of the application

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal regarded the trade mark in question as if it were an advertising slogan, indication of quality or incitement to purchase without considering whether the trade mark could also be an indication of origin.

Pleas in law:

Furthermore, the Board of Appeal erred in its examination of the trade mark as a whole and in its examination of its component parts and committed an error of law by requiring that the trade mark combines words that are unusual or out of the ordinary in relation to the goods in question in order to acquire distinctive character.

Finally the Board of Appeal did not assess distinctiveness in relation to the specific goods applied for.

---
Case: 2:12-cv-00656-GCS-EPD Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/25/12 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T22:00:04-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO