alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Sioux quillwork techniques

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Sioux quillwork techniques 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  Bureau of Indian Affairs, Curriculum Development Center, Aberdeen Area Office 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Illustrates various quillwork techniques and shows Indian articles when decorated with porcupine quills. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  161 × 46 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  008705590.jpg; 008705590.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Case: 2:12-cv-00557-EAS-MRA Doc #: 23 Filed: 08/16/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T21:01:57-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-006-CV

NO. 2-06-155-CV

Ex Parte S.R.D., a child

In the Interest of B.G.D. a/k/a S.R.D., A Child	APPELLANT

	----------

	FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY	NO. 2-006  -04400    08-463              -CV

JOSEPH H. LEE, III, VIRGINIA K. LEE AND 	APPELLANTS

PATRICIA LEE BARROW AND SAVINGS 

OF AMERICA, INC.	CiItTiIMoOrRtTgGaAgGeE, InNcC.	   APPELLANT	

	V.

 OPAL LEE, IN HER CAPACITY AS 	APPELLEE

MaAnNsSfFiIeElLdD InNdDeEpPeEnNdDeEnNtT ScChHoOoOlL 	APPELLEES

DiIsStTrRiIcCtT, CiItTyY oOfF MaAnNsSfFiIeElLdD, aAnNdD 

TaArRrRaAnNtT CoOuUnNtTyY, TeExXaAsS TEMPORARY ADMINISTRATOR OF 

THE ESTATE OF DALE T. LEE, DECEASED	

	----------

	FROM THE 236TH          PROBATE DISTRICT COURT  NO. 2 OF TARRANT                     TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered appellant’s [s’]’ “uNUnopposed Motion To Dismiss aAppealNotice Of Nonsuit.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P.Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the appellants [ [s][- [oOR the the party incurring the same], for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  cay CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

    HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER                                     , JJ.

DELIVERED:    September 28, 2006  December 168, 2008
Appendix G 

Temporary Proposed 

Detour Routes
(logo) C-III | C-III AssetManagement

 

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

**C-III Asset Management LLC**

 

 

The undersigned, KevinDonahue, President of C-III Asset Management LLC (f/k/a Centerline ServicingLLC), the Special Servicer under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreementdated as of December 1, 2015, relating to the **Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Trust 2015-P2, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series2015-P2** (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), hereby certifies asfollows:

 

1. a review of the activitiesof the Special Servicer and of its performance under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement during the calendar year 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) has been madeunder the undersigned’s supervision;

 

2. to the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer maintainedan effective internal control system relating to its servicing of the MortgageLoans serviced by it and has fulfilled in all material respects its obligationsunder the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Capitalized terms nototherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling andServicing Agreement.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, as of the 1stday of March, 2017, I have hereunto signed my name.

  

 

/s/ Kevin Donahue

**Kevin Donahue,** President

C-III Asset Management LLC, a 

Delaware limited liabilitycompany

 

WFCM 2015-P2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 132 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 132

        Expressing support for prayer at school board meetings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 29 (legislative day, April 28), 2005

  Mr. Vitter (for himself, Mr. Coburn, and Mr. DeMint) submitted the 
 following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
        Expressing support for prayer at school board meetings.

Whereas the freedom to practice religion and to express religious thought is 
        acknowledged to be a fundamental and unalienable right belonging to all 
        individuals;
Whereas the United States was founded on the principle of freedom of religion 
        and not freedom from religion;
Whereas the framers intended that the First Amendment would prohibit the Federal 
        Government from enacting any law that favors one religious denomination 
        over another, not prohibit any mention of religion or reference to God 
        in civic dialog;
Whereas in 1983, the United States Supreme Court held in Marsh v. Chambers, 463 
        U.S. 783, that the practice of opening legislative sessions with prayer 
        has become part of the fabric of our society and to invoke divine 
        guidance on a public body entrusted with making the laws is not a 
        violation of the Establishment Clause, but rather is simply a tolerable 
        acknowledgment of beliefs widely held among the people of this Nation;
Whereas voluntary prayer in elected bodies should not be limited to prayer in 
        State legislatures and Congress;
Whereas school boards are deliberative bodies of adults similar to a legislature 
        in that they are elected by the people, act in the public interest, and 
        are open to the public for voluntary attendance; and
Whereas voluntary prayer by an elected body should be protected under law and 
        encouraged in society because voluntary prayer has become a part of the 
        fabric of our society, voluntary prayer acknowledges beliefs widely held 
        among the people of this Nation, and the Supreme Court has held that it 
        is not a violation of the Establishment Clause for a public body to 
        invoke divine guidance: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes that prayer before school board meetings is 
        a protected act in accordance with the fundamental principles 
        upon which the Nation was founded; and
            (2) expresses support for the practice of prayer at the 
        beginning of school board meetings.
                                 <all>
```
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Hawaii volcanoes

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Hawaii volcanoes 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. National Park ServiceHarper, Charley, 1922-2007 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. National Park Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Country        
                    -  United States 
                    -           State        
                    -  Hawaii 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  143 × 60 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  019406309.jpg; 019406309.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1051

ASPEX EYEWEAR, INC., and CONTOUR OPTIK, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

E'LITE OPTIK, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

in case no. 02-CV-634, Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The court notes that E'Lite Optik, Inc. has not filed a status report.

The court's March 31, 2009 order directed E'Lite Optik to file a status report

every 60 days and within 21 days after the bankruptcy proceedings are completed or

the stay has been lifted.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

E'Lite Optik is directed to file a status report within 30 days of the date of filing of

this order and every 60 days thereafter. E'Lite Optik is further directed to file a status
report within 21 days after the bankruptcy proceedings are completed or the stay has

been lifted. Aspex Eyewear, Inc. et al. may also respond within that time.

FOR THE COURT

JUL 28 2009

/s/ Jan Horbalv

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

Date

cc:	Michael A. Nicodema, Esq.

Daniel V. Thompson, Esq.

s17

PILED _

U.S. COURT OF ApFEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

JUL 2 8 2009

JAN HORBALY

Cievc

2009-1051	 2
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Todd Shipyards Corporation (“we”, “us”, “our”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 2, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of our operations.








Date: February 3, 2011










/s/ Berger A. Dodge


Berger A. Dodge,


Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
TS-EMLA50/60/70/80

Attachment #5

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 2 

Worker/Occupational Exposure Information on the New Chemical Substance at 

Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter – Manufacture and Processing
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

JOHN PATRICK MOORE,

Plaintiff,

Civil Action 2:12-cv-609 

 vs. Judge Marbley

Magistrate Judge King

BRENT CRUSE, et al.,

Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, an inmate formerly incarcerated at the Chillicothe

Correctional Institution [“CCI”], claims that his constitutional rights

were violated by officials at CCI. Defendant Robinson, the warden of

CCI, has filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)

for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Doc. No.

18. Defendant Robinson specifically argues, inter alia, that the

Complaint, as it relates to the claims asserted against him, seeks to

posit liability on a theory of respondeat superior. Because such a

theory is an insufficient basis for liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, see

Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 691-95 (1978); Bellamy v.

Bradley, 729 F.2d 416, 421 (6th Cir. 1984), defendant Robinson contends

that the claims asserted against him must be dismissed.

In his response to defendant Robinson’s motion, Doc. No. 27,

plaintiff concedes that “Warden Robinson cannot be held liable as

Respondeat Superior,” id. [sic], and asks that this defendant be

dismissed from the action.

It is RECOMMENDED that the motion to dismiss filed on behalf of

Case: 2:12-cv-00609-ALM-NMK Doc #: 28 Filed: 11/14/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
defendant Robinson, Doc. No. 18, be GRANTED.

If any party seeks review by the District Judge of this Report

and Recommendation, that party may, within fourteen (14) days, file and

serve on all parties objections to the Report and Recommendation,

specifically designating this Report and Recommendation, and the part

thereof in question, as well as the basis for objection thereto. 28

U.S.C. §636(b)(1); F.R. Civ. P. 72(b). Response to objections must be

filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof. 

F.R. Civ. P. 72(b). 

The parties are specifically advised that failure to object to

the Report and Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to de

novo review by the District Judge and of the right to appeal the decision

of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers,

Local 231 etc., 829 F.2d 1370 (6th Cir. 1987); United States v. Walters, 

638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

November 14, 2012 s/Norah McCann King 

 Norah McCann King

 United States Magistrate Judge

2

Case: 2:12-cv-00609-ALM-NMK Doc #: 28 Filed: 11/14/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# **EXHIBIT 32.1**

#  

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) thisQuarterly Report of Cruzan International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company asof June 30, 2005 and its results of operations for the period ended June 30,2005.

 
|                             |   /s/   Jay S. Maltby                   |
|----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                             | Jay S. Maltby                                     |
|                             | Chairman, Chief Executive  Officer  and President |
|                             |
|                             |                                              |
|                             |                                              |
| Date:  August 11, 2005 |                                              |

 

1

----
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Torotel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB forthe period ending January 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dale H. Sizemore, Jr., ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of the Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Dale H. Sizemore, Jr. |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |
|                            |
| Dale H.  Sizemore, Jr.          |
| Chief  Executive Officer        |
| March 13,  2003                 |

 

----
Exhibit 32

               Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
                      Of Title 18 of the United States Code


     Each of the undersigned officers of Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. certifies
that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. for
the quarterly period ended July 3, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the
requirements of secton 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tootsie Roll
Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries.









Dated: Nov 11, 2004                   /S/MELVIN J GORDON
       ------------                   ------------------
                                     MELVIN J GORDON
                                     Chairman and Chief and
                                     Executive Officer



Dated: Nov 11, 2004                   /S/G HOWARD EMBER, JR.
       ------------                   ----------------------
                                     G. Howard Ember, Jr.
                                     V.P./Finance and
                                     Chief Financial Officer
P ur p os e of 

Gr a nt Pr o gr a m

Eli gi bl e 

A p plic a nts

Eli gi bl e 

Pr oj ects

To f u n d hi g h w ay-r ail or p at h w ay-r ail gr a d e cr ossi n g i m pr ov e m e nt pr oj ects t h at 

f oc us o n i m pr ovi n g t h e s af ety a n d m o bility of p e o pl e a n d g o o ds. 

( 4 9 U. S. C. 2 2 9 0 9)

• St at es, i ncl u di n g t h e District of C ol u m bi a, P u ert o Ric o, a n d ot h er U nit e d St at es 

t errit ori es a n d p oss essi o ns.

• P oli tc al s u b divisi o n of a St at e.

• F e d er ally r ec o g niz e d I n di a n Tri b e.

• A u nit of l oc al g ov er n m e nt or a gr o u p of l oc al g ov er n m e nts.

• A p u blic p ort a ut h ority.

• A m etr o p olit a n pl a n ni n g or g a niz a t o n.

A gr o u p of t h e e n t t es d escri b e d a b ov e.

Gr a d e s e p ar a t o n or cl os ur e, i ncl u di n g t hr o u g h t h e us e of a bri d g e, 

e m b a nk m e nt, t u n n el, or c o m bi n a t o n t h er e of.

Tr ack r el oc a t o n.

I m pr ov e m e nt or i nst all a t o n of pr ot ec tv e d evic es, si g n als, si g ns, or ot h er 

m e as ur es t o i m pr ov e s af ety r el at e d t o a s e p ar a t o n, cl os ur e, or tr ack 

r el oc a t o n pr oj ect.

Ot h er m e a ns t o i m pr ov e t h e s af ety if r el at e d t o t h e m o bility of p e o pl e a n d 

g o o ds at hi g h w ay-r ail gr a d e cr ossi n gs (i ncl u di n g t ec h n ol o gic al s ol u t o ns).

T h e pl a n ni n g, e nvir o n m e nt al r evi e w, a n d d esi g n of a n eli gi bl e pr oj ect ty p e.

R ailr o a d Cr ossi n g Eli mi n a t o n Gr a nt Pr o gr a m

T h e F e d er al R ailr o a d A d mi nistr a t o n s u p p orts t h e n a t o n’s r ail 

n et w or k t hr o u g h a v ari et y of c o m p e t t v e a n d d e dic at e d gr a nt pr o gr a ms 

d esi g n e d t o i m pr ov e hi g h w ay-r ail gr a d e cr ossi n g s af et y a n d i m pr ov e t h e 

m o bilit y of p e o pl e a n d g o o ds. 

T h e R ailr o a d Cr ossi n g Eli mi n a t o n gr a nt pr o gr a m is a n e w gr a nt 

pr o gr a m e n act e d i n S ec t o n 2 2 3 0 5 of t h e Bi p ar ts a n I nfr astr uct ur e L a w.

R ailr o a d Cr ossi n g Eli mi n a t o n Gr a nt Pr o gr a m F act S h e et

F O R T H E M O S T U P- T O- D AT E I N F O R M ATI O N, VI SI T F R A’ S W E B SI T E: h t ps://r ailr o a ds. d ot. g o v/ BIL

F Y 2 2- F Y 2 6 F u n di n g: $ 6 0 0 Milli o n/ Ye ar A D V A N C E A P P R O P R ATI O N SF Y 2 2- F Y 2 6 F u n di n g: $ 5 0 0 Milli o n/ Ye ar A U T H O RI Z E D F U N DI N G ( * F ULLY A U T H O RI Z E D L E V EL S)