alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 20 06 - 25001 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 20 06 -NM - 0 79 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRA

N SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, li st latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
Exhibit
10.42


 


Page 1 of 1


 


March
30, 2022


 


Via
Email


cdeutsch@paradigmopp.com


jteta@paradigmopp.com


 


Paradigm
Opportunities Fund, LP


96
Moseman Ave


Katonah,
NY 10536


Attention:
Corey Deutsch


 


	Re:	Stock
    Purchase Agreement dated September 30, 2021 between INVO Bioscience, Inc. and Paradigm Opportunities Fund, LP (as amended, the “Agreement”)


 


Dear
Corey,


 


Under
the terms of the Agreement, you agreed to purchase 600,703 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share of INVO Bioscience, Inc.
(the “Company”) for a purchase price of $1,999,740.29 on or before February 28, 2022. To date, you have paid the Company
$315,000 and were issued 94,623 shares of our common stock. Since, as of today which is past the above due date, you have not been able
to complete the purchase of the remaining 506,080 shares you committed to, we hereby terminate the Agreement.


 


Pursuant
to Section 6.3 of the Agreement, if either party fails to perform its obligations at the Closing (as defined in the Agreement), then
the breaching party shall be required to pay the non-breaching party a non-refundable fee in an amount equal to $250,000 (the “Break-Up
Fee”), which fee must be paid within 5 days of the scheduled Closing. We reserve the right to exercise our rights under the agreement,
including with respect to the Break-up Fee. In the interim, we are willing to discuss with you a resolution of this issue.


 


Please
do not hesitate to contact me or our CFO, Andrea Goren, should you have any questions.


 


	Kind
    regards,	 
	 	 
	/s/
    Steven Shum	 
	 	 
	Steven
    Shum, CEO
# C_2013178EN.01000401.xml

| 22.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Regionale del Veneto — Sede di Mestre-Venezia (Italy) lodged on 27 March 2013 — SICES and Others v Agenzia Dogane Ufficio delle Dogane di Venezia

(Case C-155/13)

2013/C 178/06

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Commissione Tributaria Regionale del Veneto — Sede di Mestre-Venezia

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Società Italiana Commercio e Servizi srl, in liquidation (SICES) and Others

Applicants:

Defendant: Agenzia Dogane Ufficio delle Dogane di Venezia

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

On a proper construction of Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 341/2007, (1) is there an unlawful transfer of licences for the importation at a preferential rate of duty of garlic of Chinese origin under the GATT quota, where the holder of those licences, following payment of the duty due, places the garlic in question on the market by means of a transfer to another trader who holds import licences and from whom it had — prior to the importation — acquired the garlic concerned?

1

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 341/2007 of 29 March 2007 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas and introducing a system of import licences and certificates of origin for garlic and certain other agricultural products imported from third countries (OJ 2007 L 90, p. 12).

1

---
Exhibit
No. 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Pacific Land Trust (the “Trust”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Roy Thomas, Chief
Executive Officer of the Trust, certifies, to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.




TEXAS PACIFIC LAND TRUST(Registrant)Date:  May
      7, 2009
                
                By:
                /s/
      Roy ThomasRoy
      Thomas, General Agent and Chief Executive
  Officer
Exhibit 99.8



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

of Tipperary Corporation Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tipperary Corporation (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David L. Bradshaw, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/     David L. BradshawName:

David L. BradshawTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate:

May 14, 2003
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9330 

To provide for the issuance of a Prince Hall Commemorative Stamp. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 9, 2024 

Mr. GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for the issuance of a Prince Hall Commemorative 

Stamp. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Original Prince Hall 

5 Commemorative Stamp Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PRINCE HALL COMMEMORATIVE SEMIPOSTAL 

7 STAMP. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The United States Postal Service 

9 shall issue a semipostal stamp (hereinafter in this Act reVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:35 Sep 07, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H9330.IH H9330

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9330 IH

1 ferred to as the ‘‘Prince Hall Commemorative Stamp’’) in 

2 accordance with this section. 

3 (b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The issuance and sale 

4 of the Prince Hall Commemorative Stamp shall be gov5 erned by the provisions of section 416 of title 39, United 

6 States Code, and regulations issued under such section. 

7 (c) DISPOSITION OF PROCEEDS.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—All amounts becoming avail9 able from the sale of the Prince Hall Commemora10 tive Stamp (as determined under section 416(d) of 

11 such title 39) shall be transferred to the Department 

12 of Education, for purposes of making Federal Pell 

13 Grants under section 401 of the Higher Education 

14 Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a), through payments 

15 which shall be made at least twice a year. 

16 (2) PROCEEDS NOT TO BE OFFSET.—In accord17 ance with section 416(d)(4) of such title 39, 

18 amounts becoming available from the sale of the 

19 Prince Hall Commemorative Stamp (as so deter20 mined) shall not be taken into account in any deci21 sion relating to the level of appropriations or other 

22 Federal funding to be furnished in any year to the 

23 Department of Education. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9330 IH

1 (d) DURATION.—The Prince Hall Commemorative 

2 Stamp shall be made available to the public for during 

3 the two-year period beginning on January 1, 2025. 

4 (e) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this Act, the term 

5 ‘‘semipostal stamp’’ refers to a stamp described in section 

6 416(a)(1) of title 39, United States Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 4.2


 


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM


 



We have issued our report dated April 1, 2022, with respect to the financial statement
of m+ funds Trust, Series 1-26 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-263748) and related
Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name
as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.


 


 


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


April 1, 2022
Before the First Division,

May 29, 1946

No. 51169.

#### Protests 8941-K, etc., of Semon Bache & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 255 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
```
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 10-05



Private Placement Subscription Agreement for B.C. Residents




Name of Purchaser

 _________________________________

     (the “Purchaser”)




Address

_________________________________




City

_________________________________




Province

__________________________________




Country

__________________________________




Postal Code

__________________________________




Date

__________________________________




Payment Method

      Conversion
    of Debt                                




# Shares Purchased

__________       x US$0.50 = 

   $ ____________

(the “Shares”)                                       Subscription Price




/s/: “Purchasers”

____________________

  Please make cheque payable to: 

Signature of Purchaser

       “Legacy Wine & Spirits International Ltd.”




These securities have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933(the “US Securities Act”) and may not be offered or sold in the United States or to U.S. persons (other than distributors) unless the securities are registered under the US Securities Act, or an exemption from the registration requirements of the US Securities Act is available. Hedging Transactions involving these securities may not be conducted unless in compliance with the US Securities Act.




    This Subscription is accepted for and on behalf of Legacy Wine & Spirits International Ltd.




        By: /s/: M. Scheive                                                Date: August 19, 2008

              Marc Scheive, President




1.0   Purchase and Sale of Shares




1.1   The Purchaser subscribes for and agrees to receive, as a conversion of debt, common shares of Legacy Mining Ltd., a Nevada Corporation (the “Issuer”) in the amount set out above (the “Shares”), to be recorded in the name of the Purchaser at the address set out above.

Legacy Wine & Spirits International Ltd.   385 52 Ave., Pointe-Calumet, Quebec, J0N 1G4   

 Phone: 1-888-488-6882      Fax: 1-888-265-0498     E-mail:  info@legacywineandspirits.com

 



1

 










 

2

 














3











 

4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
       
<S>                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<CASH>                          178
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                178
<PP&E>                          1,171,230
<DEPRECIATION>                  1,115,032
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  128,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           5,208,005
<BONDS>                         20,437
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        38,258,096
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    128,133
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                256,042
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              2,341,180
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (2,597,222)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .07
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6532

In Re: BRIAN TIMOTHY HUGGINS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-01-4527)

Submitted: April 17, 2002 Decided: April 29, 2002

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brian Timothy Huggins, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Brian Timothy Huggins petitions this court for a writ of

mandamus directing the district court to require the United States

to respond to his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) motion,

which Huggins filed in November 2001. The district court docket

sheet reveals that on March 27, 2002, the district court ordered

the United States to respond. Accordingly, Huggins has received

the relief he seeks. We deny the motion for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis and dismiss the mandamus petition as moot. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before us and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Toreador Resources Corporation;(2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;(3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operation and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;(4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     (5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: November 9, 2007/s/ Charles J. Campise
 Charles
J. CampiseVice President  Finance & Accounting andChief Accounting Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
No. 50209.

#### Protests 947882-G, etc., of American Straw Goods Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items of the merchandise consist of hats composed of manila hemp similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the items of merchandise in question were held dutiable as claimed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JAMES A. D'ANGELO, SR., AND CAROLYN D'ANGELO,

Petitioners

v.

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 342 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of September, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
EXHIBIT 12

TRANSAMERICA FINANCE CORPORATIONCOMPUTATION OF RATIO
OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES(Dollar amounts in millions)

|                                  
|----------------------------------
|2002                              
|                                  
|Fixed charges:                    
|Interest and debt expense         
|One-third of rental expense       
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|Earnings:                         
|Income from continuing operations 
|before income taxes               
|Fixed charges                     
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

The
ratios were computed by dividing income from continuing operations before income taxes
and fixed charges, by fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest and debt expense
and one-third of rent expense, which approximates the interest factor.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v THOMAS H. FRANKLIN, Private, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

12 USCMA 477, 31 CMR 63

No. 15,014

August 4, 1961

*Colonel Olin W. Jones,*USMC, was on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Commander Louis L. Milano,*USN, and *Lieutenant (jg) Conrad Alexander Buhler,*USNR, were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion

HomeR Ferguson, Judge;

Among other offenses, the accused was found guilty of breach of arrest, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 95, 10 USC § 895, and absence without leave, in violation of Code, supra, Article 86, 10 USC § 886. These offenses occurred at the same time and place but were treated separately for purposes of punishment. This was error. United States v Modesett, 9 USCMA 152, 24 CMR 414; United States v Lowe, 9 USCMA 215, 25 CMR 477; United States v Taglione, 9 USCMA 214, 25 CMR 476. Accordingly, corrective action must be taken.

The decision of the board of review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy for further reference to the board and reassessment of the sentence in light of the multiplicity here involved.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs in the result.
NO. 07-00-0174-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

OCTOBER 26, 2010

JAMES B. CRENSHAW,

Appellant

V.

MIDWEST CONCRETE, INC., STEVE HOLBERT,

KENNETH THOMAS, AND BEVERLY HOLBERT,

Appellees

____________________________

FROM THE 137TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 97-560,037; HONORABLE CECIL G. PURYEAR, PRESIDING

***Memorandum Opinion***

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

James B. Crenshaw appeals from the trial court’s summary judgment.  We dismiss the appeal.  On July 17, 2000, this Court issued an opinion removing this case from the docket and abating it because appellee Midwest Concrete had filed a bankruptcy petition.   The bankruptcy proceedings were closed as of July 15, 2010, and this court reinstated the case on the docket on September 14, 2010.  Also on September 14, 2010, counsel for appellant was notified that appellant’s brief was due no later than October 14, 2010, no extension would be granted, and if the brief was not filed by the deadline, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.  To date, no brief or motion to extend the deadline has been filed.  Nor has the court received any explanation for the omission.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P.  38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b).

Per Curiam

2
EXHIBIT  32.2





Certification
of Chief Financial Officer


pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted


pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NYFIX, Inc. for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Steven R. Vigliotti, as Chief
Financial Officer of NYFIX, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NYFIX,
Inc.





Dated:
May 11, 2009





By:
                      /S/ Steven R.
      VigliottiSteven
      R. VigliottiChief
      Financial Officer