alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008200EN.01000601.xml

| 6.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 August 2008

(2008/C 200/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5487 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 167,06 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4606 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79285 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4622 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6312 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 122,74 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0315 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,928 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 235,13 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7049 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,2159 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4965 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,375 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7882 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6890 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6168 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,0873 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1388 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1339 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 575,80 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,4340 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,6173 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2173 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 059,10 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0666 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,140 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,4325 |
| THB | Thai baht | 52,075 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4308 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,3331 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5487

JPY

Japanese yen

167,06

DKK

Danish krone

7,4606

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79285

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4622

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6312

ISK

Iceland króna

122,74

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0315

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,928

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

235,13

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7049

PLN

Polish zloty

3,2159

RON

Romanian leu

3,4965

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,375

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7882

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6890

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6168

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,0873

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1388

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1339

KRW

South Korean won

1 575,80

ZAR

South African rand

11,4340

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,6173

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2173

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 059,10

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0666

PHP

Philippine peso

68,140

RUB

Russian rouble

36,4325

THB

Thai baht

52,075

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4308

MXN

Mexican peso

15,3331

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10(yy) 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment to Employment Agreement is dated as of March 17, 2005 (this
“Amendment”) among Perrigo Company, a Michigan corporation (“Buyer”), Agis Industries (1983) Ltd., an Israeli public company (the “Company”), and Sharon Kochan (the “Executive”).

 WHEREAS, Buyer, Company and the Executive are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of November 14, 2004 (the
“Employment Agreement”) which provides, among other things, that the Buyer agrees to appoint Executive to serve as a member of the Buyer’s Executive Committee; and 
 WHEREAS, Buyer, Company and the Executive wish to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, the mutual covenants, promises and representations set forth herein, and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
 1. Amendments.

 (a) The last sentence of Section 1(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety. 
 (b) The phrase “for members of the Executive Committee” as used in Sections 2(a), (b) and (c) are each hereby deleted in their
entirety and replaced with the phrase “for members of the Parent’s senior management”. 
 2. Benefit Levels.
Notwithstanding anything else to the contrary contained in this Amendment, it is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that the benefit levels provided for in Sections 2(a), (b) and (c) shall remain at the same levels as they were
prior to this Amendment. 
 3. Effect of Amendments. Except to the extent expressly amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect in all respects. 
 4. Applicable Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed and enforced
in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law provision or rule that would cause the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction. 
 5. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts (including counterparts executed and delivered by facsimile, which
shall be as counterparts executed and delivered manually), all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement and shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other party,
it being understood that all parties need not sign the same counterpart. 
 [Signature page follows.] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized
respective officers as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	PERRIGO COMPANY
		
	By:	 	 /s/ David T. Gibbons

	Name:	 	David T. Gibbons
	Title:	 	President & CEO
	
	AGIS INDUSTRIES (1983) LTD.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Moshe Arkin

	Name:	 	Moshe Arkin
	Title:	 	Chairman
	
	SHARON KOCHAN
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Sharon Kochan

	Name:	 	Sharon Kochan
(Reap. Dec. 9256)

#### Trans World International Service Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 492549.

(Decided November 20, 1958)

*Eugene R. Pickrell*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappr.aisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the merchandise covered by the above appeal for reappraisement, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was as follows:

> Methyltesterone USP, BP-$.46 per gram net pkd

> Testosterone Propionate USP BP_$.46 per gram net pkd

> Testosterone USP BP_$.48 per gram net pkd

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there were no higher export values for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this appeal may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

*581On tbe agreed facts, I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c))-, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise herein involved, and that such value in each case is as follows:

Methyltesterone USP, BP_$0.46 per gram, net packed

Testosterone Propionate USP, BP_$0.46 per gram, net packed

Testosterone USP, BP_$0.48 per gram, net packed

Insofar as the appeal relates to other merchandise, it is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9322 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9322

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 675 Wolf Ledges Parkway in Akron, Ohio, as the ``Judge James R. 
                    Williams Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 6, 2024

 Mrs. Sykes (for herself, Mr. Landsman, Mr. Wenstrup, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. 
 Jordan, Mr. Latta, Mr. Miller of Ohio, Mr. Davidson, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. 
  Turner, Ms. Brown, Mr. Balderson, Mr. Joyce of Ohio, Mr. Carey, Mr. 
  Rulli, Ms. Plaskett, Ms. McClellan, Ms. Kamlager-Dove, Ms. Kelly of 
 Illinois, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania, Mr. Amo, 
 Mr. Veasey, and Mr. Neguse) introduced the following bill; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 675 Wolf Ledges Parkway in Akron, Ohio, as the ``Judge James R. 
                    Williams Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JUDGE JAMES R. WILLIAMS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 675 Wolf Ledges Parkway in Akron, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Judge James R. Williams Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Judge 
James R. Williams Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: May 12, 2015

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Anita Lee, EPA Region 9

SUBJECT: May 11, 2015 Telephone call with Fort Mojave Tribe Regarding Proposed Clean Power 

Plan for Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A conference call was held between the Fort Mojave Indian Tribe and EPA Region 9 on May 11, 2015

to provide the tribe with a brief update of the publicly-announced schedule for proposing a Federal Plan, 

and for taking final action on the proposed Clean Power Plan and Supplemental Proposal.

ATTENDEES

Fort Mojave Indian Tribe

 Luke Johnson, Environmental Director

 Christine Medley, GAP Coordinator

EPA Region 9

 Amy Zimpfer, Associate Director, Region 9 Air Division

 Ben Machol, Manager, Region 9 Clean Energy and Climate Change Office 

 Anita Lee, Region 9 Air Planning Office

 Ann Lyons, Region 9 Office of Regional Counsel

ATTACHMENTS

 none
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Southern District of Ohio

Barbara J. Martin, )

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-649

Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting 

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of %, along with costs.

’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

other: Pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. §405(g), the decision of the Commissioner is 

reversed, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings 

pursuant to this order and the joint stipulation. .

This action was (check one):

’ tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

’ tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: Aug 7, 2013 CLERK OF COURT

s/Denise M. Shane

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-00649-JLG-EPD Doc #: 28 Filed: 08/07/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# Official Journal C 189/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.189.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 189 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5529 June 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.189.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 189

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5529 June 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 189/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6563 — Mexichem SIH/Wavin) (1) | 1 |
| 2012/C 189/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6469 — Tognum/TMH) (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 189/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6563 — Mexichem SIH/Wavin) (1)

1

2012/C 189/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6469 — Tognum/TMH) (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 189/03 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 189/03

Euro exchange rates

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 189/04 | State aid — Romania — State aid SA.33623 (12/C) (ex 11/NN) — Alleged preferential electricity tariffs for ArcelorMittal Galați SA — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1) | 3 |
| 2012/C 189/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6537 — Faurecia/Plastal) (1) | 17 |
| 2012/C 189/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5979 — KGHM/Tauron Wytwarzanie/JV) (1) | 18 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2012/C 189/04

State aid — Romania — State aid SA.33623 (12/C) (ex 11/NN) — Alleged preferential electricity tariffs for ArcelorMittal Galați SA — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1)

3

2012/C 189/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6537 — Faurecia/Plastal) (1)

17

2012/C 189/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5979 — KGHM/Tauron Wytwarzanie/JV) (1)

18

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
cc: Hon. Jerome T. Tao, District Judge 

Anthony Perry Oliver 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) I947A
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 18, 2016

Order 

March 18, 2016

153309(102)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

ANDREW MAURICE RANDOLPH,

Defendant-Appellant.

SC: 153309

COA: 321551

Genesee CC: 2013-033003-FC

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to file an 

application for leave to appeal in excess of the page limit restriction is GRANTED. The 

60-page application submitted on March 8, 2016, is accepted for filing.
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of InterXion Holding N.V. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies to the undersigneds knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Richard Rowson

Richard J.C. Rowson

Interim Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 30, 2018
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Robert L.G. White, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Breeze-Eastern Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  November 14, 2006 /s/  Robert L.G. White   Robert L. G. White   President & Chief Executive Officer   
29
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6670

ANDREW SULLIVAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-3423-6BD)

Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 14, 1997

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Sullivan v. South Carolina, No. CA-96-3423-6BD (D.S.C. Apr. 24,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. JOSE AGUILAR , Jr., De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 15-30072

D.C . No. 1:11-c r-00004-B M M M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of M o nta

na B ria n M . M orris, Distric t

Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d M arc h 15, 2016 ** B e fore : GOODW IN, LEAVY, a nd C HR ISTEN, C irc uit Judge s. Jose Aguila

r, Jr., a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s orde r de ny ing his motion for a s e nte nc e re duc tion unde r 18 U.S.C . § 3582(c )(2). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo whe the r the distric t c ourt ha s a uthority to 

# FIL ED MAR 21 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).m odify

a se nte nc e unde r se c tion 3582(c )(2), se eUnite d State s v . Le nie ar , 574 F.3d 668, 672 (9th C ir. 2009), a nd we a ffirm . Aguila r c o nte nds tha

t he is e ligiblefor a

se nte nc e re d

u c tion unde r Am e ndm e nt 782 to the

Se nte nc ing Guide line s. The distric t c ourt prope rly c onc lude d tha

t Aguila r is ine ligiblefor a

re duc tion be c a

use his 168-m o nth se nte nc e is a lre a dy at the bottom

of his a m e nde d guide line range . Se eU.S.S.G. § 1B 1 .10(b)(2)(A) (distric t c ourt m ay not re duc e a

se nte nc e “ to a

te rm tha t is le ss tha n the m inim

um of the am e nde d guide line range ” ); Unite d State s v . Dav is , 739 F.3d 1222, 1224 (9th C ir. 2014). C ontra ry to Aguila r’ s c onte ntion, his “ a

pplic a ble guide l ine range ” is de te rm ine d without c onside ration of a ny de pa rture or va

rianc e a pplie d at his original se nte n c ing. Se eU.S.S.G. § 1B 1.10 c m t. n.1(A); Unite d State s v . Ple asant , 704 F.3d 808, 812 (9th C ir. 2013). AFFIRM E D.

1 5 - 3 0 0 7 2 2