alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **CMBS Department**

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Bank of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Trust2016-UBS10, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-UBS10

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of June 1, 2016 (the “Agreement”), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian(“Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”):

 

(a) A review of WellsFargo’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performanceunder the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer’s knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled allof its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Super collider exploring new frontiers: the superconducting super collider

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Super collider exploring new frontiers: the superconducting super collider 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of Energy 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  180 × 60 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  18506412.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Interim Decision .#1547 

Krrima or 141mM 

In Visa Petition Proceedings 

A-14389539 

Decided by Regional Commissioner /away 17 1966 

Petition to classify alien as eligible orphan as defined in section 101(b) (1) (F), 

Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended by P. L. 89-238, is denied 

since adoption of the beneficiary by her widowed aunt does not meet the 

statutory requirement of adoption by a United States citizen and spouse. 

This matter is before the Regional Commissioner on appeal from 

the denial of the petition to classify the alien as an eligible orphan 

under section 101(b) (6) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

This section has since been repealed by P.L. 89-236, effective December 1 1965, and the definition of the term "child" in section 101 

(b) (1) (F) of the Act has 'been amended to read as follows: 

{Bs) a child, under the age of fourteen at the time a petition is filed in his 

behalf to accord a Aseeliication as an immediate reiative under section 201(b), 

who is an orphan because, of the death or disappearance of, abandonment or desertion by, or separation- or loss from, both parents, or for whom the sole 

er surviving parent is incapable of providing the proper care which will be 

provided tne ctuid if admitted to the 'United Staten and who has in writing 

irrevocably released the child for emigration and adoption; who has been 

adopted abroad by a United States citizen and his spouse who personally saw 

and observed the child prior to or during the adoption proceedings; or who is 

coming to the United States for adoption by a United gtates citizen and spouse 

who have complied with the preadoption requirements, if any, of the child's 

proposed residence: Provided, That no natural parent or prior adoptive parent of any such child shall thereafter, by virtue of such parentage, be accorded any right, privilege, or status under this act. (Emphasis supplied.) 

The instant petition discloses that the beneficiary was born December 13, 1954 at Barbados, West Indies; that she presently resides 

with her mother at Belleplaine, St. Andrew, Barbados; that she has 

only one parent; that the latter is unable to provide for her support. 

It is further reflected that the child's aunt, a 49-year-old United 

States citizen whose husband is deceased, intends to adopt the beneficiary in this country. 

473 
Interim Decision #1547 

It hai been held in utter pf D —, 8 I. & N. Dec. 628, that the 

adoption of a child by an aunt who is divorced does not meet the 

statutory requirement under section 4 of the Act of September 11, 

1957 that the adoption of en eligible orphan be by a United States 

citizen and spouse. Similar language is contained in. section 101(b) 

(1) (F) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended, as 

previously noted above. The adoptive ' parents must be a married 

couple and, therefore, the instant petition by the alien's widowed 

aunt cannot be approved. Accordingly, this appeal will be dismissed. 

ORDER: It is ordered that the appeal be and the same is hereby 

dismissed. 

• 

474
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DALE B. GREEN

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 18

- 1611

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

.

________________________________/

Opinion filed August 24 , 2018

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit

Court for Putnam County

, Patti A. Christensen , Judge.

Dale B. Green, Daytona Beach, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the postconviction court’s denial of Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion as it

was both untimely and improperly successive. We dismiss Appellant’s untimely effort to

seek revie w of the denial of his rule 3.80 0(c) motion, as no appeal is available from an

order denying that motion which sought purely discretionary relief from the court below.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J.

, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
No. 40326.

#### Petition 5726-R of F. W. Myers & Co., Inc. (Ogdensburg).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It whs established that the exporter had two price lists, one for the wholesale or jobber glove trade and the other for the retail trade. The major portion of the sales was made to retailers who paid a higher price. The merchandise was entered at prices appearing upon the wholesale list and the appraiser advanced the value. It was found that the error in invoicing was an honest one and that full and candid disclosure was made to the customs authorities. On the evidence presented the petition was granted.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Consumer handbook onadjustable-rate mortgages.**
 
2012 | 2014 | 2020
 
SuDoc:FR 1.8/3:M 84/2/
Item Number:0443-E-60 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000918003
 
November 29, 2017
Exhibit 35.7



|     |  |                                                                                                             
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084, 8th Floor 401 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2015, by and among GS MORTGAGE
SECURITIES CORPORATION II, as Depositor, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, SITUS HOLDINGS, LLC as Operating Advisor, WELLS FARGO
BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-GS1 (the
Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant
to Section 10.07 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Marthinsen, Managing Director of Special Servicing do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Special Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such
period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Daniel Marthinsen
|Daniel Marthinsen    
|Managing Director    
|Wells Fargo Bank     



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Tipperary
Corporation  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tipperary
Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph B. Feiten, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | /s/ JOSEPH B. FEITEN |                        
| | -------------------- | -----------------------
| |                      |                        
| | Name:                | Joseph B. Feiten       
| | Title:               | Chief Financial Officer
| | Date:                | August 14, 2003
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7997** 

ALBERT CHARLES EICHEL , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. MACDONALD, Ms.; Chapline; BENNETT, Ms.; Major , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. ( 1:12

- cv - 01220

- TSE

- TRJ )

Submitted : January 17, 201 3 Decided: January 23, 2013

Before GREGORY, SHEDD , and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Albert Charles Eichel, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Albert Charles Eichel appeals the district court ’ s order dismi ssing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (200 6 ). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R.
34(b). Because Eichel’ s informal brief does not challenge the
basis for the di strict court’s disposition, Eichel has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly , we deny Eichel’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm the district

court ’ s order . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Rhett G. DePew,

Plaintiff

 v.

Dr. Gary Krisher,

Defendant

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action 2:12-cv-00250

Judge Marbley

Magistrate Judge Abel

Plaintiff Rhett G. DePew, a state prisoner, brings this action alleging that

defendant Dr. Gary Krisher was deliberately indifferent to his safety when he refused to

give plaintiff a bottom bunk restriction. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff

DePew's December 13, 2012 objections (doc. 32) to Magistrate Judge Abel's December 3,

2012 Report and Recommendation (doc. 30) that defendant Krisher’s October 10, 2012

motion for judgment on the pleadings (doc. 25) be granted.

Upon de novo review in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B),

the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and GRANTS defendant

Krisher’s October 10, 2012 motion for judgment on the pleadings (doc. 25).

Plaintiff’s objections set out his medical treatment and argue that he has been

denied medical treatment for serious medical needs and subjected to cruel and unusual

punishment by Dr. Krisher. However, the objections do not contest the Magistrate

Judge’s finding that because he has been transferred to a new facility and is no longer

under the care of defendant Dr. Krisher, his claim for injunctive relief is MOOT. See, e.g.,

Case: 2:12-cv-00250-ALM-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 01/07/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Kensu v. Haigh, 87 F.3d 172, 175 (6th Cir. 1996). Nor does he contest the Magistrate

Judge’s finding that a prisoner has no liberty interest in remaining at a particular prison,

Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238, 245 (1983), and that his transfer to a lesser security

prison appeared to be a reasonable one that is consistent with ODRC's classifications of

prisoners and its designation of the prisons where prisoners of similar security levels

are held. Since the complaint seeks only injunctive relief and not money damages,

(March 22, 2012 Complaint, p. 6, Doc. 2, PageID 7), plaintiff’s claims against defendant

Krisher are MOOT.

For the reasons set out above, defendant Krisher’s October 10, 2012 motion for

judgment on the pleadings (doc. 25) is GRANTED. Defendant Dr. Gary Krisher is

hereby DISMISSED from this lawsuit. All other defendants named in the complaint

were earlier dismissed by the Court’s July 16, 2012 Order (doc. 17). Accordingly, the

Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter JUDGMENT for defendants. This action is

hereby DISMISSED.

 s/Algenon L. Marbley 

Algenon L. Marbley 

United States District Judge 

Case: 2:12-cv-00250-ALM-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 01/07/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Torotel, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2003, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Dale H. Sizemore, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Dale H. Sizemore, Jr.             |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                             |
|                                             |
| Dale H. Sizemore, Jr.                            |
| Chief Executive Officer  September 11, 2003 |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I,
Jean-Marc Allain, President and Chief Executive Officer of Trans-Lux
Corporation, do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

    (1) The Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2010 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

    This Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not
be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Registrant or
the certifying officer.



                                        /s/ Jean-Marc Allain
                                        -------------------------------------
Date:  August 18, 2010                  Jean-Marc Allain
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
1998 CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AUDITS & SURVEYS WORLDWIDE,  INC. AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.     
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1998          
<CASH>                         1,174                              
<SECURITIES>                   0          
<RECEIVABLES>                  13,079            
<ALLOWANCES>                   (151)                           
<INVENTORY>                    1,454
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               16,239      
<PP&E>                         7,661    
<DEPRECIATION>                 (4,027)     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 25,576     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          12,046      
<BONDS>                        1,599          
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0        
<PREFERRED>                    0          
<COMMON>                       131      
<OTHER-SE>                     9,861     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   25,576          
<SALES>                        0     
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               27,737          
<CGS>                          0     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  13,328     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               13,999          
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0        
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             182        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                228           
<INCOME-TAX>                   29        
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            199          
<DISCONTINUED>                 0          
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0          
<CHANGES>                      0            
<NET-INCOME>                   199           
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  .02           
<EPS-DILUTED>                  .02                             
        

</TABLE>
10IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

MAUREEN RILEY, : 

 : 

 Plaintiff, : Case No. 12-cv-0628 

 : 

 v. : JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 : 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL : 

SECURITY, : 

 : Magistrate Judge Deavers 

 Defendant. : 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

 On July 10, 2013 the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and 

Recommendation in this case recommending that this Court overrule Plaintiff’s Statement of 

Errors and affirm the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision. (Doc. 16) The parties were 

specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the 

consequences of their failure to do so. There has nevertheless been no objection to the Report 

and Recommendation. 

 Since neither party has objected, and deadline for such objections to be filed elapsed on 

July 24, 2013, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 

16). Plaintiff’s Statement of Errors (Doc. 10) is hereby OVERRULED. The decision of the 

Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED. This actions is hereby DISMISSED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/ Algenon L. Marbley 

 ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

DATED: September 6, 2013

Case: 2:12-cv-00628-ALM-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 09/06/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
EXHIBIT 35.1
 SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
  (a)
    
    A review of the Servicers activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing
agreement during the period from July 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 has been made under my
supervision.
 (b)
    
    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the
aforementioned period.
  /s/ Daniel J. GardettoDaniel J. GardettoAssistant Treasurer of
Ford Motor Credit Company LLC,
as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner
Trust 2010-B