### 1468 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2015 / Notices

6 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22.

7 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(b)(2–3).

8 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(b)(3).

9 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F). 10 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). and accurately clear and settle its cleared CDS contracts. In addition, the proposed revisions are consistent with the relevant requirements of Rule 17Ad–

22. 6 In particular, the amendments to the Risk Management Framework will enhance the financial resources available to the clearing house by imposing a more conservative initial margin requirement, and are therefore reasonably designed to meet the margin and financial resource requirements of Rule 17Ad–22(b)(2–3). 7 Additionally, the amendments to the Risk Management Framework related to ICC’s GF allocation methodology further ensure ICC maintains sufficient financial resources consistent with the requirements of Rule 17Ad–22(b)(3). 8 As such, the proposed rule change is designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions, derivatives agreements, contracts, and transactions within the meaning of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) 9 of the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition

ICC does not believe the proposed rule change would have any impact, or impose any burden, on competition. The risk model enhancements apply uniformly across all market participants. Therefore, ICC does not believe the proposed rule change imposes any burden on competition that is inappropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not been solicited or received. ICC will notify the Commission of any written comments received by ICC.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action

Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:

(A) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

• Use the Commission’s Internet comment form ( http://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– ICC–2014–24 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

• Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR–ICC–2014–24. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site ( http://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filings will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of ICE Clear Credit and on ICE Clear Credit’s Web site at https:// www.theice.com/clear-credit/regulation.

All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–ICC–2014–24 and should be submitted on or before January 30,

2015. 10

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. Brent J. Fields, Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015–00126 Filed 1–8–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 8011–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**Notice of Availability for Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Draft**  **EIS), Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation, Draft Subsistence Evaluation, and**  **Schedule of Public Hearings for the Proposed Airport, Angoon, Alaska** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

**ACTION :**  Notice of availability (NOA), notice of comment period, notice of public hearing.

**SUMMARY :**  In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. ) and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 CFR parts 1500– 1508), the FAA issues this notice to advise the public that a Draft EIS for the proposed airport in Angoon has been prepared and is available for public review and comment. Included in the Draft EIS are a subsistence evaluation consistent with Section 810 of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) and a draft evaluation pursuant to Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 (recodified as 49 U.S.C. 303(c)).

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before March 11, 2015. The public comment period will commence on January 9, 2015 and will close on March 11, 2015. The FAA intends to host public information meetings and hearings on the Draft EIS/810 Evaluation/4(f) Evaluation on the following dates:

1. March 3, 2015 in Juneau, Alaska, at the Centennial Hall, 101 Egan Dr., Juneau, AK from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.

2. March 5, 2015 in Angoon, Alaska, at the Angoon Community Association Building, 315 Heendae Rd., Angoon, AK from 2:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.

3. March 10, 2015 at the Holiday Inn, 550 C St. SW., Washington, DC, from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.

**ADDRESSES :**  Copies of the Draft EIS and the evaluations are available at the following locations:


### 1469 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2015 / Notices

1. Online at www.angoonairporteis.com 2. Juneau Public Library

• Downtown Branch, 292 Marine Way,

Juneau, AK 99801

• Douglas Branch, 1016 3rd Street,

Douglas, AK 99824

• Mendenhall Mall Branch, 9109

Mendenhall Mall Rd., Juneau, AK

99801 3. U.S. Forest Service, Admiralty Island

National Monument Office, 8510 Mendenhall Loop Road, Juneau, AK

99801 4. Angoon Community Association

Building, 315 Heendae Rd., Angoon,
AK 99820 5. Angoon City Government Office, 700

Aan Deina Aat Street, Angoon, AK
99820 6. Angoon Senior Center, 812 Xootz Rd.,

Angoon, AK 99820 7. The FAA, Airports Division. Please

contact Leslie Grey at (907) 271–5453 for a copy. You may submit comments or request more information by any of the following methods:

1. Email: comments@ angoonairporteis.com; include ‘‘Angoon Airport EIS comments’’ in the subject line of the message.

2. U.S. Mail: Angoon Airport EIS Comments, 1220 SW. Morrison, Suite 700, Portland, Oregon 97205.

3. In person: To drop off comments, contact Leslie Grey at (907) 271–5453.

Comments from interested parties on the Draft EIS are encouraged, and may be presented orally at the public hearings. Testimony will be limited to 5 minutes per speaker. The FAA encourages all interested parties to provide comments concerning the scope and content of the Draft EIS. Comments should be as specific as possible and address the analysis of potential environmental impacts and the adequacy of the proposed action or merits of alternatives and the mitigation being considered. Reviewers should organize their participation so that it is meaningful and makes the agency aware of the viewer’s interests and concerns using quotations and other specific references to the text of the Draft EIS and related documents. Matters that could have been raised with specificity during the comment period on the Draft EIS may not be considered if they are raised for the first time later in the decision process. This commenting procedure is intended to ensure that substantive comments and concerns are made available to the FAA in a timely manner so that the FAA has an opportunity to address them.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Leslie Grey, AAL–611, Federal Aviation Administration, Alaskan Region, Airports Division, 222 W. 7th Avenue, Box #14, Anchorage, AK 99513. Ms. Grey may be contacted during business hours at (907) 271–5453 (telephone) and (907) 271–2851 (fax), or by email at Leslie.Grey@faa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (DOT&PF) has requested funding and approval from the FAA for a new land-based airport and an access road to improve the availability and reliability of transportation services to and from Angoon. The DOT&PF’s proposed action is located in the Admiralty Island National Monument and Kootznoowoo Wilderness Area (Monument– Wilderness Area). The FAA has proposed additional alternatives to the proposed action, including the no action alternative. The purpose and need is discussed in detail in the Draft EIS.

The proposed project would be comparable to other rural airports in Southeast Alaska, such as those at Kake or Hoonah. It would consist of a paved, 3,300-foot-long and 75-foot-wide runway, with future expansion to 4,000 feet long.

Construction of the proposed airport would be completed in two to three construction seasons. The impact categories considered in the Draft EIS include numerous categories as required by FAA Orders 1050.1E and 5050.4B. In addition, subsistence activities and wilderness character are evaluated. Because the DOT&PF’s proposed action is located in the Monument–Wilderness Area, the DOT&PF has indicated that it intends to submit an application under ANILCA Title XI to use the lands, using the Draft EIS as supporting documentation.

Additional details regarding the project can be found on the project Web site at www.angoonairporteis.com.

Issued in Anchorage, Alaska, on December 31, 2014. Byron K. Huffman, Manager, Airports Division, AAL–600.
[FR Doc. 2015–00023 Filed 1–8–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Railroad Administration**

**[Docket Number FRA–2014–0091]**

**Petition for Waiver of Compliance**

In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this document provides the public notice that by a document dated September 29, 2014, the Eastern Berks Gateway Railroad (EBGR) has petitioned the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for a waiver of compliance from certain provisions of the Federal railroad safety regulations contained at 49 CFR 223.11, Requirements for existing locomotives . FRA assigned the petition Docket Number FRA–2014– 0091. EBGR is headquartered in Boyertown, PA, and is a for-profit subsidiary of the nonprofit Colebrookdale Railroad Restoration Trust. EBGR has petitioned for a permanent waiver of compliance for its Plymouth locomotive, Number 6434, from the requirements of the Railroad Safety Glazing Standards, 49 CFR part 223, for certified glazing in all windows and a minimum of four emergency windows. The locomotive was built in 1964. The locomotive is used for one or two weekly trips over 8.6 miles of track between Boyertown and Pottstown, PA, which serves as a feeder line to the Norfolk Southern Railroad that runs through Pottstown, PA. The line meanders through woods and rock formations. There are six public at-grade highway crossings on the railroad. Two of those crossings have automated flashing lights. The remainder is equipped with cross-bucks. The locomotive is used primarily for passenger excursion trains and for yard switching duties in Boyertown. The maximum speed limit for these operations is 10 mph. EBGR indicates no instance of vandalism or personal injury, and professes financial burden in retrofitting the locomotive to comply with FRA safety glazing standards.

A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications concerning the petition, is available for review online at www.regulations.gov and in person at the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., W12–140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Operations Facility is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.

Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for their request.

All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the appropriate docket number and may be