alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

R & D FILM 1, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

 Civil Action 2:12-cv-1137

v. Judge Michael H. Watson

 Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers

DOES 372-401,

Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

 Plaintiff filed its Complaint in this action on December 10, 2012. On July 12, 2013, the

Court ordered Plaintiff to amend its Complaint within thirty days to substitute in the real names

for its Doe Defendants and to perfect service on those named partes as required under Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or to alternatively show cause why the Court should not dismiss

this action pursuant to Rule 4(m). (ECF No. 6.) To date, Plaintiff has not moved to amend its

Complaint to substitute in the real names for its Doe Defendants. Nor has Plaintiff responded to

the Court’s Show Cause Order. It is therefore RECOMMENDED that the Court dismiss this

action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to timely effect service of process. 

PROCEDURE ON OBJECTIONS

If any party seeks review by the District Judge of this Report and Recommendation, that

party may, within fourteen (14) days, file and serve on all parties objections to the Report and

Recommendation, specifically designating this Report and Recommendation, and the part in

question, as well as the basis for objection. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

Case: 2:12-cv-01137-MHW-EPD Doc #: 7 Filed: 08/21/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Response to objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

The parties are specifically advised that the failure to object to the Report and

Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and

waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court. See, e.g., Pfahler v. Nat’l Latex

Prod. Co., 517 F.3d 816, 829 (6th Cir. 2007) (holding that “failure to object to the magistrate

judge’s recommendations constituted a waiver of [the defendant’s] ability to appeal the district

court’s ruling”); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005) (holding that

defendant waived appeal of district court’s denial of pretrial motion by failing to timely object to

magistrate judge’s report and recommendation). Even when timely objections are filed,

appellate review of issues not raised in those objections is waived. Robert v. Tesson, 507 F.3d

981, 994 (6th Cir. 2007) (“[A] general objection to a magistrate judge’s report, which fails to

specify the issues of contention, does not suffice to preserve an issue for appeal . . . .”) (citation

omitted)).

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: August 21,2013 /s/ Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers 

 Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers

 United States Magistrate Judge 

2

Case: 2:12-cv-01137-MHW-EPD Doc #: 7 Filed: 08/21/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual
Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 2, 2010 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with
the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2010-4 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial
Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Accounting Corporate Controller of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2012 through
December 31, 2012, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my
knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                 |  |  |  |                      
|--- |  | ------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey               |  |  |  | Dated: March 26, 2013
|    |  | Connie Coffey                   |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President,       |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Accounting Corporate Controller |  |  |  |
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

(subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of LVFAR
Green Technology Corp., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended October 31, 2013 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: February 13, 2014 | By:/s/ Peter H. Tong                      
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------------
|                         | Peter H. Tong, Chief Executive Officer and
|                         | Chief Financial Officer                   



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-10.60





 EXHIBIT 10.60 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”), made this 12th day of July, 2017, by and among BioE LLC, a
Minnesota limited liability company with offices located at 8000 Norman Center Drive, #620, Bloomington, MN 55437 (“Licensor”), CytoMedical Design Group LLC, a Minnesota limited liability, and Cryo-Cell International, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, with offices located at Cryo-Cell International, Inc., 700 Brooker Creek Blvd., Suite 1800, Oldsmar, FL 34677 (“Licensee”). 

RECITALS 
 WHEREAS the Parties
entered into a Cord Blood Technology Exclusive License Agreement with an Effective Date of 30 June, 2015, (the “Agreement”); 

WHEREAS Licensee and Licensor wish to amend the Agreement as set forth below; THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 1.    Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the
Agreement. 
 2.    The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein by reference. 

3.    Section 5 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

“5.    Licensee shall pay Licensor the amount of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) on or before
July 14, 2017 as royalties for the licenses granted herein. Thereafter, the license contemplated by this Agreement will be fully paid-up and no further royalty payments or license fees shall be due or
owed now or in the future to Licensor from Licensee.” 
 4.    Section 6 is deleted in its entirety. 

5.    Section 7.1 is deleted. 

6.    Except as hereby amended or as otherwise expressly set forth herein, the Agreement and all of the terms and
provisions thereof shall remain in full force and effect. Wherever a conflict exists between this Amendment and the Agreement, the provisions of this Amendment shall control. 

7.    This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective successors,
assigns and representatives. 












 8.    This Amendment may be executed and delivered in counterparts,
including by facsimile or electronic signature included in an Adobe PDF file, each of which shall be deemed an original and which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to he executed as of the day and year first above stated. 

 

			
	BIOE LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Dennis M. Lindahl

	Name:	 	Dennis M. Lindahl
	Title:	 	Chairman
	Date:	 	7/12/17
	
	CRYO-CELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Mark Portnoy

	Name:	 	Mark Portnoy
	Title:	 	Co-CEO
	Date:	 	7/12/17
	
	CYTOMEDICAL DESIGN GROUP LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael P. Haider

	Name:	 	Michael P. Haider
	Title:	 	CEO
	Date:	 	7/12/17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

R & D FILM 1, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

 Civil Action 2:12-cv-1136

v. Judge Michael H. Watson

 Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers

DOES 353-371,

Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

 Plaintiff filed its Complaint in this action on December 10, 2012. On July 12, 2013, the

Court ordered Plaintiff to amend its Complaint within thirty days to substitute in the real names

for its Doe Defendants and to perfect service on those named partes as required under Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or to alternatively show cause why the Court should not dismiss

this action pursuant to Rule 4(m). (ECF No. 7.) To date, Plaintiff has not moved to amend its

Complaint to substitute in the real names for its Doe Defendants. Nor has Plaintiff responded to

the Court’s Show Cause Order. It is therefore RECOMMENDED that the Court dismiss this

action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to timely effect service of process. 

PROCEDURE ON OBJECTIONS

If any party seeks review by the District Judge of this Report and Recommendation, that

party may, within fourteen (14) days, file and serve on all parties objections to the Report and

Recommendation, specifically designating this Report and Recommendation, and the part in

question, as well as the basis for objection. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

Case: 2:12-cv-01136-MHW-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 08/21/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Response to objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

The parties are specifically advised that the failure to object to the Report and

Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and

waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court. See, e.g., Pfahler v. Nat’l Latex

Prod. Co., 517 F.3d 816, 829 (6th Cir. 2007) (holding that “failure to object to the magistrate

judge’s recommendations constituted a waiver of [the defendant’s] ability to appeal the district

court’s ruling”); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005) (holding that

defendant waived appeal of district court’s denial of pretrial motion by failing to timely object to

magistrate judge’s report and recommendation). Even when timely objections are filed,

appellate review of issues not raised in those objections is waived. Robert v. Tesson, 507 F.3d

981, 994 (6th Cir. 2007) (“[A] general objection to a magistrate judge’s report, which fails to

specify the issues of contention, does not suffice to preserve an issue for appeal . . . .”) (citation

omitted)).

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: August 21,2013 /s/ Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers 

 Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers

 United States Magistrate Judge 

2

Case: 2:12-cv-01136-MHW-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 08/21/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Todd Shipyards Corporation ("we", "us", "our") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) 	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of our operations.

 

Date: November 6, 2008

 

/s/ Stephen G. Welch

Stephen G. Welch, 

President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL AND EXECUTIVE FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Apollo Acquisition Corporation, (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: October 3, 2011



/s/ Joseph Rozelle

Joseph Rozelle

President

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                           MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                   1,112,143
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            1,745,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                               144,000
<INVENTORY>                                              1,410,484
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         4,391,459
<PP&E>                                                   2,384,159
<DEPRECIATION>                                             842,508
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           6,847,048
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    1,390,283
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                     8,664
<OTHER-SE>                                               5,411,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             6,847,048
<SALES>                                                    408,801
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         1,040,276
<CGS>                                                      463,314
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            2,007,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           2,194
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (941,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (941,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (941,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (.11)
        

</TABLE>
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Honor awards medals

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Honor awards medals 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  151 × 41 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  026148084.jpg; 026148084.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
# Official Journal L 267/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.267.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 267 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 539 October 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.267.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 267

English edition

Legislation

Volume 539 October 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2010/597/EU |
| | * | Decision of the European Central Bank of 16 September 2010 on the authenticity and fitness checking and recirculation of euro banknotes (ECB/2010/14) | 1 |
| | | GUIDELINES |
| | | 2010/598/EU |
| | * | Guideline of the European Central Bank of 16 September 2010 amending Guideline ECB/2000/7 on Monetary Policy Instruments and Procedures of the Eurosystem (ECB/2010/13) | 21 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

2010/597/EU

*

Decision of the European Central Bank of 16 September 2010 on the authenticity and fitness checking and recirculation of euro banknotes (ECB/2010/14)

(ECB/2010/14)

1

GUIDELINES

2010/598/EU

*

Guideline of the European Central Bank of 16 September 2010 amending Guideline ECB/2000/7 on Monetary Policy Instruments and Procedures of the Eurosystem (ECB/2010/13)

(ECB/2010/13)

21

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Order filed August 20, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00207-CV

____________

WHITE STAR PUMP COMPANY, LLC, Appellant

V.

ALPHA HUNTER DRILLING, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-57416

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due April 14, 2020. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court granted the reporter’s first request for extension of time to file 

the record until July 31, 2020. As of today, the record has not been filed and the 

court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. Because the 

reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.
We order Amanda King, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Spain, Hassan, and Poissant.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

William J. Brown, II, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. Case No. 2:11-cv-995

Michael J. Astrue, JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY

Commissioner of Magistrate Judge Kemp

Social Security, 

 

Defendant. 

ORDER

 This case is before the Court to consider a Report and Recommendation issued by the

Magistrate Judge on July 2, 2012. The time for filing objections has passed, and no objections

have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report

and Recommendation. The plaintiff’s statement of errors is OVERRULED. The Clerk shall

enter judgment in favor of the defendant Commissioner of Social Security.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Algenon L. Marbley 

Algenon L. Marbley

United States District Judge

Case: 2:11-cv-00995-ALM-TPK Doc #: 16 Filed: 08/28/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>