alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 1 AND 2 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,314
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,589
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,285
<PP&E>                                          31,242
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,518
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,944
<BONDS>                                         18,790
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,660
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           361
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,322
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,518
<SALES>                                          2,919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,919
<CGS>                                            1,329
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (5)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 544
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (1)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (1)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (1)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 23

- 00092

- CR

ISMAEL CASO JR. A/K/A ISMAEL CASO

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 103rd District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019DCR1178

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed

. The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
August 8, 2024
Exhibit 35.4

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC35

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the Trustee in its capacity as Custodian (a Certifying Servicer)
under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2015 (the Agreement), by and among, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as
Master Servicer, C-III Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and Paying Agent, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, here by
certifies in accordance with Section 10.08 of the Agreement:



|A) | A review of such Certifying Servicers activities from December 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the reporting period) and of such Certifying Servicers performance under the Agreement has been made
under such officers supervision and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|B) | That, as to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICASas Trustee in its capacity as Custodian/s/ David CoBY:

David CoTitle:

DirectorDate:

March 1, 2016
Case: 2:12-cv-00309-EAS-EPD Doc #: 11 Filed: 08/24/12 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00309-EAS-EPD Doc #: 11 Filed: 08/24/12 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T10:26:44-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge Washoe County Alternate Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk Jason Michael Flores

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2
(0) I94Th ce°
# C_2008108EN.01001801.xml

| 29.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/18

---

Calls for proposals under the work programme for 2008 of the Information and Communication Technologies Policy Support Programme as part of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007 to 2013)

(2008/C 108/11)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of the call for proposals under the work programme for 2008 of the Information and Communication Technologies Policy Support Programme (ICT PSP) as part of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call: CIP-ICT PSP-2008-2.

Call documentation including content, deadline and budget is given in the call texts which are published on the ICT PSP website: http://ec.europa.eu/ict_psp

---
August 6, 1940

No. 44188.

#### Protests 5746-K, etc., of H. P. Lambert Co., Inc.

Application by Government for rehearing granted.
Before the First Division,

August 27, 1943

No. 48695.

#### Protests 59155-K, etc., of Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the Radium D in question is similar in all material respects to the commodity involved in *Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.*v. *United States*(10 Cust. Ct. 227, C. D. 759), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1749 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1201, par. 1749) was sustained.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 14, 2020

No. 04-20-00305-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.K.P., A CHILD

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-PA-01650

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant Mom’s brief was due to be filed with this court on October 12, 2020. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.6(a). On the due date, Mom filed a motion for a twenty-day extension of time to 

file her brief.

Appellant Mom’s motion is GRANTED. Her brief is due on November 2, 2020. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of October, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
(Reap. Dec. 8215)

#### Schneider Bros. & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 46681.

(Decided April 21, 1953)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States subject to the approval of the Court that the merchandise herein consists of 300 gross toy rubber water pistols; that the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, plus the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, is $2.80 per gross, net packed, and that there is no higher foreign value.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this appeal to reap-praisement be subrhitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

*546• On the agreed facts I find the export, value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the involved merchandise and that such value was $2.80 per gross, net packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 75 (Thursday, April 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7430]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 35014]


Suffolk & Southern Rail Road LLC--Sublease and Operation 
Exemption--Brookhaven Rail Terminal

    Suffolk & Southern Rail Road LLC (Suffolk), a noncarrier, has filed 
a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to sublease from 
Custom Recycling LLC (Custom), a noncarrier, and to operate 1,280 feet 
of rail line located at the Brookhaven Rail Terminal at Yaphank, 
Suffolk County, NY. There are no mileposts on the line. Custom 
currently leases the line from Nicolia Realty LLC, also a noncarrier 
and owner of the line. As a result of this transaction, Suffolk will 
provide common carrier service over this line of railroad, which 
currently is being served as industry trackage by the New York & 
Atlantic Railway, a Class III rail carrier.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Suffolk intends to engage an existing short line railroad to 
provide service over the line and notes that such carrier will file 
a notice of exemption for Board authority before commencing 
operations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Suffolk certifies that its projected annual revenues as a result of 
this transaction will not exceed those that would qualify it as a Class 
III rail carrier and will not exceed $5 million.
    The earliest this transaction may be consummated is the May 3, 2007 
effective date of the exemption (30 days after the exemption was 
filed).
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption 
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a 
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the 
exemption. Petitions for stay must be filed no later than April 26, 
2007 (at least 7 days before the exemption becomes effective).
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 35014, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a 
copy of each pleading must be served on John D. Heffner, John D. 
Heffner, PLLC, 1920 N Street, NW., Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at http://www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: April 12, 2007.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-7430 Filed 4-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 11

Honoring the service of Reverend Lloyd Ogilvie. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2005

Mr. KYL (for himself, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. LOTT, Mr. CHAMBLISS, and Mr. 

SANTORUM) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION

Honoring the service of Reverend Lloyd Ogilvie.

Whereas a decade ago, on January 24, 1995, the Reverend 

Lloyd Ogilvie was elected by the Senate as its 61st Chaplain; 

Whereas Reverend Lloyd Ogilvie is a friend and confidant to 

Senators, and to many staff members and Senate employees; 

Whereas Reverend Lloyd Ogilvie was always a soothing presence in a body whose Members are sometimes at loggerheads; 

Whereas Reverend Lloyd Ogilvie is someone upon whom 

Democrats and Republicans, men and women of different 

religious faiths, can count as a sympathetic and trusted 

advisor; and 
2

•SRES 11 ATS 

Whereas after the tragedy of September 11, 2001, and until 

his retirement in 2003, we depended on him even more 

to strengthen our spirit and help us find consolation in 

Scripture: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate honors the significance of 

2 this 10-year anniversary by declaring to the Reverend 

3 Lloyd Ogilvie that we remember his loving service to the 

4 Senate and this Country, and use this anniversary to ex5 press our gratitude to him for his ministry to the Senate 

6 family.

Æ
(Reap. Dec. 10216)

#### Japan America Trading Agency, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. DE-26239, etc.

(Decided March 29, 1962)

*Stein & Sliostalc*for the plaintiff.

*William H. Orriolc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A”, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that on or about the dates of exportation to the United States of the footwear (tabis, etc.) covered by the Yasuda & Co. invoices and entries the subject of the Appeals for Reappraisement enumerated in the Schedule of Cases attached hereto and made a part hereof, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States was the ex factory unit values as invoiced plus the f .o.b. charges, but not including the buying commission.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeals for Re-appraisement enumerated in the attached 'Schedule are limited to Yasuda & Oo. invoices and abandoned in all other respects.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there were no higher foreign values for merchandise such as or similar to the merchandise covered by the Appeals for Reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Oases on the dates of exportation thereof to the United States.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeals for Re-appraisement enumerated in the attached 'Schedule of Oases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation, and the record thus made.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the footwear (tabis, etc.), covered by the invoices and entries of Yasuda & Co., is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and that such statutory value for the said merchandise is the ex-factory unit values, as invoiced, plus the f.o.b. charges, but not including the buying commission.

*604As to all other merchandise included on the invoices covered by the entries involved in these appeals for reappraisement, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EX-10.(P)(III) Second Addendum to January 23, 2007






EXHIBIT 10(p)(iii)




	 	 	 
	

	 	HARRIS CORPORATION
	 
	 	 
	HOWARD L. LANCE

	 	1025 West NASA Boulevard
	Chairman, President and

	 	Melbourne, FL USA 32919
	Chief Executive Officer

	 	phone 1-321-724-3900
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	www.harris.com






July 30, 2008




Timothy Thorsteinson

59 Farnham Avenue West

Toronto, Ontario M4V1 H6

Canada




Subject: Second Addendum to January 23, 2007 Letter of Agreement




Dear Tim:



This will confirm our recent discussions, whereby we agreed that the terms of your January 23, 2007
Letter of Agreement and the December 5, 2007 addendum to that Letter of Agreement will be extended
to June 30, 2009, except for the changes set forth below.





	 	•	 	Positon: You will remain employed by Harris Canada Systems Inc. You will be president of
Harris Corporation’s Broadcast Communications Business Unit, reporting directly to me.
	 
	 	•	 	Base Salary and Annual Incentive Plan (AIP): Your base salary will be CAD 552,200 and
your AIP target will be CAD 399,000. Future increases to your base salary and AIP target
will be subject to review by Harris’ Management Development and Compensation Committee.
	 
	 	•	 	Benefits: This will confirm that, due to your U.S. citizenship and job duties, you, your
wife and your children will be eligible for medical and dental benefits while you are in the
U.S. Coverage will be pursuant to the terms of Harris’ medical and dental plans, but you
will not be required to make any payments or have any deductions taken from your pay for
this coverage. With this limitation, you expressly disclaim entitlement to all other Harris
Corporation U.S. benefits.
	 
	 	•	 	Compliance with Section 409A: If, at the time of your separation from service within the
meaning of Section 409A, you are a “specified employee” within the meaning of Section
409A(a)(2)(B)(i), and if any payment or benefit to which you become entitled under this
Second Addendum to the January 23, 2007 Letter of Agreement is considered deferred
compensation subject to interest, penalties and additional tax imposed pursuant to Section
409A(a) of the Code as a result of the application of Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i), then no such
payment shall be payable or benefit shall be provided prior to the date that is the earlier of
(i) six months and one day after your separation from service, and (ii) your death, and the
initial payment or provision of benefit shall include a catch-up amount covering amounts that
would otherwise have been paid or provided but for the application of this subparagraph.




assuredcommunications



 









 










Tim, I look forward to continuing our working relationship as we grow the company. If you have any
questions, please contact me or Jeff Shuman.




Sincerely,




/s/ Howard L. Lance        

Howard L. Lance




Accepted:




	 	 	 
	/s/ Timothy Thorsteinson 

Timothy Thorsteinson (Signature)

	 	 
	 
	 	 
	8/1/08

Date
May 25, 1972

No. 72-13

#### Steven J. Meredith, PVT, U. S. Marine Corps v United States Navy Court of Military Review (Panel No. 2); Honorable Charles Timblin, CAPT, JAGC, USN, Senior Judge; Honorable Robert C. Lehnert, COL, USMC, Judge; and Honorable J. Fielding Jones, Judge.

A Petition for Writ of Mandamus and a Petition for New Trial having been submitted in the above-entitled case, it appears from the matters presented in support of accused’s Petition that the accused was, at the time of the decision of the Court of Military Review and constructive service upon him, mentally incapable of understanding the nature of the appellate proceedings in his case. Such has the effect of tolling appellate review in his case and renders the decision of the said Court a nullity. *672United States v Thomas, 13 USCMA 163, 32 CMR 162 (1962); United States v Bell, 7 USCMA 744, 23 CMR 208 (1956); United States v Korzeniewski, 7 USCMA 314, 22 CMR 104 (1956). Accordingly, it is necessary for the Court of Military Review to reconsider the accused’s case, after first determining that he is presently able to comprehend the proceedings against him. At such time, it may consider the post-trial information regarding his mental condition at the time of trial and time of the offenses, in light of the evidence thereto presented at the trial level. Manual for Courts-Martial, 1969, Paragraph 120; United States v Thomas, supra.

The Petition for New Trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General without action, as accused’s case is not presently pending before this Court, within the meaning of Article 73, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 873.
Exhibit (31)-1**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Phillip D. Wright, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Transcontinental Gas Pipe LineCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:August 8, 2006     By: /s/Phillip D. Wright     Phillip D. Wright    Senior Vice President    (Principal Executive Officer)