alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 9324)

#### Plywood & Door Manufacturers Corporation et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 14323, etc.

(Decided February 24, 1959)

*James Wilson Young*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel have stipulated and agreed in these cases as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto that the merchandise involved in the appeals for re-appraisement enumerated in Schedule “A”, attached hereto and made part hereof, consists of plywood exported from Finland in the years 1955, 1956, and 1957 and that the merchandise is properly valued on the basis of foreign value as defined in Section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for home consumption including cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the appraised unit values, less 4% net packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals for reappraisement enumerated on Schedule “A”, annexed hereto and made part hereof may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find foreign value, as defined in section 402(c), as amended, of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved in the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached *504to and made a part of this decision, and that such value, in each case, was the appraised unit value, less 4 per centum net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-K of Jasper Explorations, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert Denman Chief Financial Officer, Secretary Treasurer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: June 14, 2012








/s/ Robert Denman


Robert Denman


Chief Financial Officer, Secretary Treasurer and Director
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

**DARDANOS ACQUISITION CORP.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofDardanos Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William Tay, Principal  Executive  Officer of the Company,certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to William Tay and will be retained by Dardanos Acquisition Corp. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Dated: March 25, 2013

 

By: /s/ William Tay

William Tay

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
(Reap. Dec. 8935)

Entry No. 18690, etc.

#### Castelazo & Associates *v.*United States

(Decided July 23, 1957)

*Myron W. Curzon*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Mollie Strum,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

*598WilsoN, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement involve the proper value of certain steel cutlery exported from Germany and entered at the port of Los Angeles.

It appears that the involved merchandise was appraised in DM at the unit values, less 20 per centum discount, plus 4 per centum tax, plus packing. ■

At the trial, the following stipulation was entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> * * * I offer to stipulate with the Government, that as to the merchandise covered by the invoices in these two cases, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market, in the ordinary course of trade, was the appraised unit values as shown on the invoices in red ink, less 33 and *}i*per cent, plus 4 per cent, plus packing and there was no export value which was higher * * *.

> * * * * * * *

> Miss Strum: * * * the Government so stipulates * * *.

On the agreed facts herein, I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised unit values, less 33% per centum plus 4 per centum, plus packing. Judgment will be entered accordingly.
RE: Fuel oil justification

Flajole, Andy to: Andrew Parks, Foster, Stacy 11/16/2012 11:17 AM

History: This message has been forwarded.

Hi Andrew,

Please find attached FPL’s response to the question in your email below.  Please contact me if you have

any questions.

Thank You,

Andy Flajole

Environmental Services

(561) 691‐2766

From: Parks.Andrew@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Parks.Andrew@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 12:38 PM

To: Foster, Stacy; Flajole, Andy

Subject: Fuel oil justification

Hi Stacy/Andy, could you provide your justification for your need for 1,000 hours/yr fuel oil as backup to 

the primary use of natural gas. In other words, why 1,000 hours specifically and what about the natural 

gas supply requires you to have a backup fuel oil supply? The justification is needed for our preliminary 

determination.

Thanks.

Andrew B. Parks, P.E.

Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Region IV

61 Forsyth Street, SW

Atlanta, GA 30303

Phone: 404-562-8122

Fax: 404-562-9019PEEC Back-up Back-up Fuel Oil_11-16-12.pd Oil_11-16-12.pdf
RITAJ. DUVALL, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

Civil Action 2: 12-cv-486 

Judge Michael H. Watson 

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

Defendant. 

ORDER 

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the United States Magistrate 

Judge's October 25, 2012 Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 11. After Plaintiff 

missed case scheduling deadlines and failed to respond to the Court's October 2, 2012 

Show Cause Order, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court dismiss 

Plaintiff's action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (b). 

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge specifically advises 

Plaintiff that the failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen 

days of the Report results in a "waiver of the right to de novo review ... by the District 

Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court." Report and 

Recommendation 3-4, ECF No. 11. The time period for filing objections to the Report 

and Recommendation has expired. Plaintiff has not objected to the Report and 

Recommendation. 

Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such 

Case: 2:12-cv-00486-MHW-EPD Doc #: 13 Filed: 11/27/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
objections expired, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge, DISMISSES this action pursuant to Rule 41 (b), and DIRECTS the 

Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

2 

Case: 2:12-cv-00486-MHW-EPD Doc #: 13 Filed: 11/27/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:11-cv-01139-EAS-NMK Doc #: 21 Filed: 06/25/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T17:46:14-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
# C_2008282EN.01S00301.xml

| 6.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/s3

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

On 6 November 2008, in Official Journal of the European Union C 282 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Seventh supplement to the 26th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain free of charge the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see: http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

Image

---
Exhibit 13.2

906 Certification

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the annual report of China Zenix Auto International Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I,
Martin Cheung, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 28, 2016
|                     | 
|By:                  |  | /s/ Martin Cheung      
|                     |  |                        
|Name:                |  | Martin Cheung          
|Title:               |  | Chief Financial Officer
# SAA-2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

                    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201*et seq.*). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.                 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2007-27815.                 

*Date Filed:*                     April 4, 2007.                 

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope:*                     April 25, 2007.                 

*Description:*                     Application of Exec Air Inc. of Naples Dba. ExecAir requesting authority to conduct scheduled passenger operations as a commuter air carrier.                 

Barbara J. Hairston, 

Supervisory Docket Officer, Docket Operations, Altenate Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. E7-7248 Filed 4-16-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
# Exempt ion Amendment	for	Bradley	Pierce	2016

Page 1 of	8 April 1, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington DC 20590

Brad ley Pierce 27 West Sutton Rd Sutton, MA 01590

Bradley Pierce would like to petition for amendments to the FAA 333 Exemption 12442, Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

- 1463.

I.

Requested a mendment to section titled "Conditions and Limitations"

Number 1 of "Conditions and Limitations" of Exemption 12442, R egulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

- 1463 states "authorized operations by this grant of exemption are limited to the DJI Phantom 3 Professional and 3D Robotics Solo when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft wi ll require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption."

This petitioner Bradley Pierce, would like to amend the selection of sUAS to include make/models that are identified in the monthly updated approved list located at Docket ID: FAA

- 2007

- 3330 titled "Approved Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Make/Model under Section 333".

Conditions and limitations of implementing the use of any par ticular approved make/model UA would remain the same as listed in Exemption 12442, Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

- 1463

The petitioner states there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that was the basis for the granting of the original exemption, FAA 333 Exemption 12442, Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

- 1463

.

Respectfully,

Mr. Bradley Pierce 27 West Sutton Road Sutton, MA 01590
# C_2021316EN.01000101.xml

| 6.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 316/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 316/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2019-2020 SESSION

Sitting of 9 March 2020

2020-2021 SESSION

Sitting of 10 March 2020

TEXTS ADOPTED

Sitting of 26 March 2020

TEXTS ADOPTED

Sittings of 16 and 17 April 2020

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
Exhibit 99



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350
as adopted pursuant to
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, as the chief executive officer and the chief financial
officer, respectively, of Todd Shipyards Corporation (the "Company") do
hereby certify for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that (i) the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter of the
Company's fiscal year ending March 30, 2003 (the "Report"), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2002, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
periods covered in the Report.




By:
   Scott H. Wiscomb
   Chief Financial Officer
   August 13, 2002




By:
   Stephen G. Welch
   Chief Executive Officer
   August 13, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
EARNINGS AND RETAINED EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                            <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    Jul-01-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<CASH>                               20,594
<SECURITIES>                         69,497
<RECEIVABLES>                        29,004
<ALLOWANCES>                          2,360
<INVENTORY>                          70,119
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    194,367
<PP&E>                              221,104
<DEPRECIATION>                       93,008
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      558,003
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                76,499
<BONDS>                               7,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             34,397
<OTHER-SE>                          403,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        558,003
<SALES>                             168,391
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    168,391
<CGS>                                79,115
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        48,526
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     (4,591)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        156
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      541
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      44,801
<INCOME-TAX>                         16,086
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  28,715
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         28,715
<EPS-BASIC>                           .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .58


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

REAPPOINTMENT TO THE 

PENNSYLVANIA INTEREST ON 

LAWYERS TRUST ACCOUNT BOARD

:

:

:

:

:

No. 162

DISCIPLINARY RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2018, Stella L. Smetanka, Esquire, Allegheny 

County, is hereby reappointed as a member of the Pennsylvania Interest on Lawyers 

Trust Account Board for a term of three years, commencing September 1, 2018.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with this first amendment on Form 10-Q/A-1 (the Amendment)
to the Quarterly Report of TransTechnology Corporation (the Company) for the
quarterly period ended September 28, 2003, as previously filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and as amended by this Amendment (the
Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Date: June 21, 2004
    /s/Robert L. G. WhiteRobert L. G. White,President & Chief Executive Officer Date: June 21, 2004
    /s/Joseph F. SpanierJoseph F. Spanier,Chief Financial Officer
# C_2007315EN.01004403.xml

| 22.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/44

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 30 October 2007 — Simsalagrimm Filmproduktion v Commission and EACEA

(Case T-314/07 R)

(2007/C 315/85)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court of First Instance has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 62 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2005 

Referred to the Committee on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Joint Committee on the Library to procure 

a statue of Rosa Parks for placement in the Capitol. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. PROCUREMENT OF A STATUE OF ROSA PARKS. 

4 The Joint Committee on the Library shall procure 

5 a statue of Rosa Parks and cause such statue to be placed 

6 in a suitable location in the Capitol, as determined by the 

7 Joint Committee on the Library. The Joint Committee on 

8 the Library shall consider all locations in the Capitol, in9 cluding Statuary Hall, the Rotunda, and the Capitol Vis10 itor Center. 

11 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF EXPENSES. 

12 The expenses incurred by the Joint Committee on the 

13 Library in carrying out this concurrent resolution shall be 
2 

SCON 62 RFH 

1 paid out of the miscellaneous items account within the 

2 contingency fund of the Senate on vouchers approved by 

3 the Joint Committee on the Library and signed by the 

4 chairman and vice-chairman of the Joint Committee. 

Passed the Senate November 16, 2005. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND RETAINED EARNINGS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-28-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<CASH>                               29,853
<SECURITIES>                         64,173
<RECEIVABLES>                        70,029
<ALLOWANCES>                          3,027
<INVENTORY>                          28,277
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    197,022
<PP&E>                              155,958
<DEPRECIATION>                       70,338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      391,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                59,417
<BONDS>                               7,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             15,975
<OTHER-SE>                          288,363
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        391,649
<SALES>                             264,433
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    264,433
<CGS>                               138,040
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        71,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     (3,793)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        419
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      919
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      58,244
<INCOME-TAX>                         21,656
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  36,588
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         36,588
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          1.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                          1.59
        

</TABLE>