alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 9 (Monday, January 14, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 2878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00582]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2012-0622; FRL-9770-1]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Georgia: New 
Source Review--Prevention of Significant Deterioration

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is withdrawing a proposed rulemaking published in the 
Federal Register on January 2, 2013, to approve changes to the Georgia 
State Implementation Plan (SIP) New Source Review Prevention of 
Significant Deterioration program for the fine particulate matter 
standards as a result of the inadvertent publication of an incorrect 
version of the proposed rulemaking.

DATES: The proposed rule published January 2, 2013, is withdrawn as of 
January 14, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Twunjala Bradley, Regulatory 
Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 
Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 
Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Ms. Bradley's 
telephone number is (404) 562-9352; email address: 
bradley.twunjala@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 2, 2013 (78 FR 45), a proposed 
rulemaking was published in the Federal Register entitled ``Approval 
and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Georgia: New Source Review--
Prevention of Significant Deterioration'' to approve changes to 
Georgia's SIP-approved regulations entitled ``Air Quality Control Rule 
391-3-.1.'' The proposed rule version published in the Federal Register 
on January 2, 2013, was an incorrect version and EPA therefore, is now 
withdrawing its January 2, 2013, proposed rulemaking action. In a 
separate action, the correct version of EPA's proposed rulemaking 
related to Georgia's Air Quality Control Rule 391-3-.1 is being 
provided for public comment. This course of action will promote 
efficiency, mitigate confusion, and create a new comment period on the 
future proposed action to approve Georgia's SIP revisions related to 
Rule 391-3-1 with a proper basis of evaluation.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Greenhouse gases, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen 
oxides, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: January 4, 2013.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2013-00582 Filed 1-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
No. 62015.

#### Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 239831-K, etc. (El Paso).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FILED AS PART OF THE QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                                 937
<SECURITIES>                                                         6,553
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       10,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                                          4,633
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    22,701
<PP&E>                                                              99,065
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      36,381
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      92,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                9,043
<BONDS>                                                             32,682
<COMMON>                                                             2,740
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                                          22,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        92,264
<SALES>                                                             26,039
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    48,572
<CGS>                                                               17,151
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       30,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   3,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      2,101
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           946
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  1,155
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         1,155
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                         0.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0.60
        

</TABLE>
- FPL_1543ocr-1
- FPL_1543ocr-2
- FPL_1543ocr-3
- FPL_1543ocr-4
- FPL_1543ocr-5
- FPL_1543ocr-6
- FPL_1543ocr-7
- FPL_1543ocr-8
- FPL_1543ocr-9
- FPL_1543ocr-10
- FPL_1543ocr-11
- FPL_1543ocr-12
- FPL_1543ocr-13
- FPL_1543ocr-14
- FPL_1543ocr-15
- FPL_1543ocr-16
- FPL_1543ocr-17
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1135

LEONNEL CEDRICK YONTA, Petitioner,
v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted: September 11, 2008 Decided: October 1, 2008 Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition dismissed in part and denied in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Danielle L. C. Beach-Oswald, BEACH-OSWALD IMMIGRATION LAW ASSOC., PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Acting Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Paul T. Cygnarowicz, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Leonnel Cedrick Yonta, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for relief from removal. Yonta first challenges the finding that he failed to show changed or extraordinary circumstances justifying the untimely filing of his asylum application. We have reviewed Yonta’s claims and conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review them. See8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3) (2006); Niang v. Gonzales , 492 F.3d 505, 510 n.5 (4th Cir. 2007); Almuhtaseb v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 743, 747-48 (6th Cir. 2006) (collecting cases). Next, Yonta challenges the finding below that he failed to qualify for withholding of removal. “To qualify for withholding of removal, a petitioner must show that he faces a clear probability of persecution because of his race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” Rusu v. INS , 296 F.3d 316, 324 n.13 (4th Cir. 2002) (citing INS v. Stevic , 467 U.S. 407, 430 (1984)). Having conducted our review, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the finding that Yonta did not establish eligibility for withholding of removal. Finally, we uphold the finding below that Yonta failed to demonstrate that it is more likely than not that he would be tortured if removed to Cameroon. 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2008).3 Accordingly, we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 223 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 223

Supporting the goals and ideals of ``National Life Insurance Awareness 
                                Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 28, 2005

 Mr. Chambliss (for himself, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, Ms. Collins, Mr. 
Vitter, Mr. Martinez, Mr. Thune, Mr. Johnson, and Mr. Allen) submitted 
      the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the goals and ideals of ``National Life Insurance Awareness 
                                Month''.

Whereas life insurance is an essential part of a sound financial plan;
Whereas life insurance provides financial security for families in the event of 
        a premature death by helping surviving family members meet immediate and 
        longer-term financial obligations and objectives;
Whereas nearly 50,000,000 Americans say they lack the life insurance coverage 
        needed to ensure a secure financial future for their loved ones;
Whereas recent studies have found that when a premature death occurs, 
        insufficient life insurance coverage on the part of the insured results 
        in \3/4\ of surviving family members having to take measures such as 
        working additional jobs or longer hours, borrowing money, withdrawing 
        money from savings and investment accounts, and, in too many cases, 
        moving to smaller, less expensive housing;
Whereas individuals, families, and businesses can benefit greatly from 
        professional insurance and financial planning advice, including the 
        assessment of their life insurance needs; and
Whereas the Life and Health Insurance Foundation for Education (LIFE), the 
        National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors (NAIFA), and a 
        coalition representing hundreds of leading life insurance companies and 
        organizations have designated September 2005 as ``National Life 
        Insurance Awareness Month'', the goal of which is to make consumers more 
        aware of their life insurance needs, seek professional advice, and take 
        the actions necessary to achieve the financial security of their loved 
        ones: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of ``National Life 
        Insurance Awareness Month''; and
            (2) calls on the Federal Government, States, localities, 
        schools, nonprofit organizations, businesses, other entities, 
        and the people of the United States to observe the month with 
        appropriate programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 158 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the President should designate 

the week beginning September 11, 2005, as ‘‘National Historically Black 

Colleges and Universities Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2005 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. BAYH, Mr. 

BUNNING, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. DEWINE, 

Mrs. DOLE, Mr. DODD, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. ISAKSON, 

Mr. KERRY, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. LOTT, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. SANTORUM, 

Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. TALENT, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. OBAMA, and Mr. BURR) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the President should 

designate the week beginning September 11, 2005, as 

‘‘National Historically Black Colleges and Universities 

Week’’. 

Whereas there are 105 historically Black colleges and universities in the United States; 

Whereas historically Black colleges and universities provide 

the quality education essential to full participation in a 

complex, highly technological society; 
2 

•SRES 158 IS

Whereas historically Black colleges and universities have a 

rich heritage and have played a prominent role in the history of the United States; 

Whereas historically Black colleges and universities have allowed many underprivileged students to attain their full 

potential through higher education; and 

Whereas the achievements and goals of historically Black colleges and universities are deserving of national recognition: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL HISTORICALLY 

3 BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES WEEK. 

4 (a) SENSE OF THE SENATE.—It is the sense of the 

5 Senate that the President should designate the week be6 ginning September 11, 2005, as ‘‘National Historically 

7 Black Colleges and Universities Week’’. 

8 (b) PROCLAMATION.—The Senate requests the Presi9 dent to issue a proclamation— 

10 (1) designating the week beginning September 

11 11, 2005, as ‘‘National Historically Black Colleges 

12 and Universities Week’’; and 

13 (2) calling on the people of the United States 

14 and interested groups to observe the week with ap15 propriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to 

16 demonstrate support for historically Black colleges 

17 and universities in the United States. 

Æ
1 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

Docket Number EPA-R08-OAR-2010-0909 

Finding of Substantial Inadequacy of Implementation Plan; Call for Utah State 

Implementation Plan Revision 

DATE: November 19, 2010 

SUBJECT: Explanation of Document Order: Finding of Substantial Inadequacy of 

Implementation Plan; Call for Utah State Implementation Plan Revision 

FROM: Tim Russ, Environmental Scientist 

 Office of Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance 

 Air and Radiation Program (8P-AR) 

TO: Docket Number EPA-R08-OAR-2010-0909 

DOCUMENT ORDER 

The documents in this docket appear in chronological order, beginning with the most recent 

documents. State regulations were posted based on the federally enforceable effective date of 

each respective regulation. Utah rules R307-210 and R307-214 appear at the beginning of the 

docket because, at present, they have not been federally approved.
California High-Speed Rail Authority 

Fresno to Bakersfield 

Section 

Draft Supplemental 

Environmental Impact 

Report/Environmental 

Impact Statement 

Appendix 3.5-A 

Technical Study: Pre-Construction 

Electromagnetic Measurement Survey 

November 2017 
Appendix 3.5-A 

Technical Study: Pre-Construction Electromagnetic Measurement Survey 

November 2017 California High-Speed Rail Authority 

Fresno to Bakersfield Section 

Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS 

This page intentionally left blank 
Appendix 3.5-A 

Technical Study: Pre-Construction Electromagnetic Measurement Survey 

California High-Speed Rail Authority November 2017 

Fresno to Bakersfield Section Page | 3.5-A-1 

Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS 

APPENDIX 3.5-A: TECHNICAL STUDY: PRE-CONSTRUCTION 

ELECTROMAGNETIC MEASUREMENT SURVEY 

A number of technical appendices included as part of the Fresno to Bakersfield Section Final 

Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement: (EIR/EIS) have not been 

recreated for the purposes of this Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS because the information contained 

within the technical appendix would remain applicable to the F-B LGA. Appendix 3.5-A did not 

require an update for the F-B LGA analysis and therefore is not included in Volume II of the 

Fresno to Bakersfield Section Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS. To review the appendix in its entirety, 

please refer to the Authority’s Final EIR/EIS: Fresno to Bakersfield website. 
Appendix 3.5-A 

Technical Study: Pre-Construction Electromagnetic Measurement Survey 

November 2017 California High-Speed Rail Authority 

3.5-A-2 | Page Fresno to Bakersfield Section 

Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS 

This page intentionally left blank
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 14

- 00217

- CR

HOBART T. RICHARDSON , JR.

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- 949

- C2

ORDER

Hobart Richardson was convicted of two counts of possession of a controlled

substance. See T EX

. H EALTH & S AFETY C ODE A NN . § 481.115 (West 2011). The State’s

brief in this appeal was originally due on November 24, 2014. The State has requested

and been granted two extensions of time to file its brief. It has now filed a third motion

for extension of time to file i ts brief.

The State’s motion is denied. Its brief is ORDERED to be filed no later than 5:00

p.m. on February 27, 2015.

PER CURIAMRichardson v. State Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion denied

Order issued and filed February 12, 201 5
Biomass-Based Diesel Exports by Destination Page 1 of2 

~ U.S. Energy Information 

Administration 

PE••• .J 'J'ROl . . . ..J FUM ... .1 & O'l'll ER L,lQUlDS 

OVERVIEW I DATA I ANALYSIS & PROJECTIONS GLOSS.~RY, FAQS' 

Exports by Destination 

Product: [ Biomass-Based Diesel v j Period-Unit: j Annual-Thousand Barrels v j 

Show Dots By: View 

~ Destination C Product History 

Total All Countries D 1,748 3,056 4 ,675 1,974 2011 -201 4 

Argentina D 0 0 2011-2012 

Australia D 38 225 105 2011-2013 

Bahama Islands D 0 2011-2012 

Brazil D 0 0 2011-2013 

Cameroon D 0 2014-2014 

Canada D 45 1,707 1,915 1,679 2011-2014 

Cayman I stands D 3 2013-2014 

Chile D 2011-2011 

China D 0 0 2011-2012 

Colombia D 0 0 2011-2012 

Congo (Brazzaville) D 0 2014-2014 

Costa Rica D 0 2011-2011 

Dominican Republic D 42 12 14 2011-2014 

Ecuador D 53 71 2012-2013 

Equatorial Guinea 0 0 2013-2013 

Estonia ll 28 2011-2011 

France D 0 2011-2011 

Germany D 0 2011-2011 

Ghana D 0 2014-2014 

Gibraltar D 483 58 2013-2014 

Guatemala D 0 0 2011-2012 

Hong Kong D 0 2012-2013 

India D 316 0 0 2011-201 4 

Ireland D 0 2011-2011 

Israel D 65 0 2011-2012 

Italy D 19 2011 -2011 

Jamaica D 0 2014-2014 

Japan D 0 0 2011-2012 

Korea , South D 22 2011-2011 

Malaysia [] 52 1,005 2011-2013 

Mexico [J 2 0 4 2011-2014 

Netherlands D 612 121 0 2011-2014 

Nicaragua D 0 2013-2013 

Nigeria D 0 2013-2013 

Norway [] 165 602 2011-2012 

Peru [] 0 9 51 59 201 1-2014 

Philippines D 0 2013-2013 

Puerto Rico D 0 201 4-2014 

Singapore D 14 0 201 1-2014 

South Africa 0 0 2012-2014 

httn://www eia_gov/clnav/net/net move exnc a EPOORDB EEX mbbl a.htm 11/25/20 15
No. 65664..

#### W. Y. Moberly, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 330061-K, etc. (Great Falls).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7313]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2539-033]


Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P.; Notice Rejecting Rehearing 
Request

April 12, 2007.
    On February 15, 2007, the Commission issued an order on offer of 
settlement and issuing new license. Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P., 
118 FERC ] 61,101. On March 19, 2007, Adirondack Hydro Development 
Corporation and Green Island Power Authority, jointly, filed a request 
for rehearing in this proceeding.
    Under section 313(a) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 
825l(a)(2000), a request for rehearing may be filed only by a party to 
the proceeding. Green Island is not a party to this proceeding.\1\ 
Therefore, the request for rehearing is rejected as to Green Island 
Power Authority.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On June 28, 2006, the Secretary denied Green Island's late 
motion to intervene in the School Street relicensing proceeding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice constitutes final agency action. Requests for rehearing 
by the Commission of this rejection notice must be filed within 30 days 
of the date of issuance of this notice, pursuant to 18 CFR 385.713 
(2006).

 Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-7313 Filed 4-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-K of Jasper Explorations, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert Denman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: June 14, 2012








/s/ Robert Denman


Robert Denman


Chief Executive Officer,


President and Director
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00125

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF R.D., A C HILD §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 233rd District

Court

of Tarrant County ( 233

- 679221

- 20 )

September 16, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s order . It is ordered that the order of the trial court is

af firmed

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

Justice Dabney Bassel