alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### F. R. Tripler & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6396.

Entry No. 5147, etc.

Invoices dated Hawick, England, July 21, 1941, etc.

Certified July 23, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., September 13, 1941, etc.

(Decided September 30, 1946)

*Jordan & Klingaman*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Code, Judge

(Abstract): These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in. foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

The agreed set of facts, embodied in the stipulation of submission, establishes that export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)) is the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values of the articles in question are the appraised values, less additions made by the importers on entry because of advances in similar cases.
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Oakwood Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President, Director,
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: March 29, 2011
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Regency Affiliates, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Laurence S. Levy,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906


of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.




Dated:
October 15, 2008





By: /s/ Laurence S. Levy


Laurence
S. Levy


President
and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 2 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 2

 Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is 
                               assembled.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2005

     Mr. Frist (for himself and Mr. Reid) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is 
                               assembled.

    Resolved, That the Secretary inform the House of Representatives 
that a quorum of the Senate is assembled and that the Senate is ready 
to proceed to business.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer**


**pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted**


**pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002** ****




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NYFIX, Inc. for the
      quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Steven R. Vigliotti, as Chief
      Financial Officer of NYFIX, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to the best of his knowledge the Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NYFIX,
      Inc.





Dated:
      May 12, 2008





By:
            /
                S
                / Steven R. VigliottiSteven
              R. VigliottiChief
              Financial Officer
# Official Journal C 38I/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 038I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6525 January 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 038I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6525 January 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2022/C 38 I/01 | Council Decision of 24 January 2022 appointing two members and three alternates to the Administrative Board of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2022/C 38 I/01

Council Decision of 24 January 2022 appointing two members and three alternates to the Administrative Board of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 38 I/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10596 – OTPP / KKR / GREENCOLLAR) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2022/C 38 I/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10526 – CHEVRON / NESTE BASE OIL) (
  1
  ) | 5 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2022/C 38 I/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10596 – OTPP / KKR / GREENCOLLAR) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

3

2022/C 38 I/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10526 – CHEVRON / NESTE BASE OIL) (
  1
  )

1

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Before the First Division,

January 10, 1941

No. 45150.

#### Protest 42505-K of Dan Brechner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the paper balls in question are the same as those 'the subject of Abstract 40492. The claim at 35 percent under paragraph 1413 was therefore sustained.
p.1 

OAR Box 1865 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

161) VI-E-10 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 12/3/2008 3:22:22 PM Sheet 161 of 198 
P.2 

TELEPHONE/CALL RECORO 

SlncMlng Call 

Qoucgoln* Cell 

Person Calling 

Person Called 

.r-^a ^ VV^Vjl-^JkjvX v 

Project No. 

*%Th\ - col , A-83-27 

Project Neae 

>*«- ^^ ^ 

KZ\Z-^ \ ^ 

Tlaa 

VI-E-10 

^_/. 0c* 

Activity 

Activity 

'C~Z*=>2- "^ ^-W^\ - V\^S r 

Ceneiel Subject 

V^< : S «=•><-> ^V 

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN 

-•^»s-/0 

•>' -. jVvn i 

V-^V U V\sS<^_ ^ ^ ^r^-Js^ , ^'•VC ^

 >V % ' 

^ Cv»<S - ^ ^ • ^ ^ J2&J Vc> o ^ > «--_•«£. CN4— 

o-w ^ ^ss V^*^ V^^>^ X 

w\cv>^ S NQ^V»>»\ a ^ V 

^ 

J) ^N * <\-e*. 

^ C A ^X-W-^Or- ^ c c_^ 

"s <*. W ^ ^-^^-V L 

^ ^5" 

W^x-^-re^ .<•>«_ v . V-rO Os-S*. _1£ ^K c v 

is- O*. 0-S» c^W =\ - No, -^—V=cv 

Vv^ . =X SV^CW^SL 

-can. 

N^V ^>Np\< ^ ^ 

« 

~""^ ^ ^\^ ^ N^. 

CXv^5V-. CS-v-vgaA V>^tv- ^

 N *^4B-Q*^S.' « C^o'sSvS 

^5 

>N.«S-fr<.-

^XdVA^ , 

^VN« C J 

^ ^ 

^r^xNgc^ sNr 

-!s-6-c*-r: N-\^Si \z. 

•^v ^ 

v, 

v*>: N<~ ^ ^<s. ' 

^ 

^ 

^CLO j .*V. is* 

<3v>—<s^ VJ^-^C- 1 

rVjS.<T^ 

7 

^ 

x-v*» 

•X^Or^^V v^<\V \ "VX** ^ Uoa. L V ^ 

rVa-Sv 

£•«-«> XT 

TS 

• ^ s x ^ o ^ 1 ^ ,««-, <^- c 

T - ^ 

^ ^ 

«^>-o \-*x^ 

ft>*x*.._S 
P.3 

1 RADIAN 

TELEPHONE CALL RECORO 

Olncoaing Call 

Doucgolng Call 

Person Celling 

Person Celled 

Generel Subject 

Project No. 

Project NeoM 

Dace 

Activity 

Activity 

Tie* 

Distributio n 

^ 

TOPICS OISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN 

^>^v <4L-

•<\^a r

 S< S P 

^ o ^ 

v_v w •^V ' V 

Co6-S-, V C^Q-^S- ^ '^^ ^

 Nx5K^> X^NJV^r^" ** ^ A No x I^_ 

Vfli. sr-^ o. > o— ^ -

V 6 X - \ x ^ s -

«a» x Ox. ' ox^^ir ^x-^~ W-^-v v i^ 

^ 

• ^ 

- i ^ , V-^g - O—^J^SNw^ X. ^ 

^>s^-<L\^s^ 

>-g^-^q-S s - ,, 

<>^ ^N^ ^ CaOv V 

^x-crvx^. . 

Qs_>s_X : 

. Sy 3^ 7 - \i\~[ -

Si«nacure
Petition for FAA Exemption: Section 333

Submitted by Christopher Bird on behalf of Bird’s Eye Photography, LLC.

Design and Operational Characteristics

Bird’s Eye Photography will be using Blade Chroma quadcopter with the dimensions of 9.5 

inches tall and 45.99 ounces. There are four 780kv brushless out runner motors. The Chroma is 

operated via remote with full control of vertical and horizontal movement, throttle and speed. It 

is equipped with a GPS and GLONASS for navigation. 

Prefight Procedures

Preflight procedures would include quadcopter and remote batteries are fully charged, blades are 

undamaged, a preflight engine check, and proper input between quadcopter and remote. Ensure 

GPS is locked at a home position prior to take off. 

Radio Frequencies

The control link between the Blade Chroma quadcopter and remote operates under 2.4GHz. The 

video link between the attached 4K camera and remote operates under 5.8GHz. 

PIC Qualifications

Christopher Bird has a certificate from National Drone School where he has passed the 

requirement examination in flying, controlling, and maneuvering, and knows the FAA rules and 

regulations qualified for UAV flight. He has a membership card from Academy of Model 

Aeronautics (member number 611685) and has been a member for over 20 years. He has been 

flying model aircrafts for over 20 years, and has obtained a private pilot license, logging over 

100 flight hours. 

Description of Use

The Blade Chroma will be used for recreational and commercial photography and videography. 

It will be used to provide images and videos for real estate, private events, sporting events, and 

other special events as requested by clientele. 

Operating Speed and Altitude

According with the FAA guidelines when it comes to commercial use of the Blade Chroma, it 

will be operating with a 200 foot ceiling. The Blade Chroma speed does not exceed 5 miles per 

hour during flight operation. Flights would be clear of any and all power lines, hazardous 

weather conditions, and from a safe distance of 25 feet from bystanders or vulnerable property.

Flights would also remain within a video link range of 1,970 feet

Area of Intended Operation

Areas of operation would include real estate property, public parks, beaches, residences, and 

businesses. Flights would comply with FAA regulations of 5 mile minimum distance from any

airports.
# C_2008245EN.01S00301.xml

| 26.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
September 20, 2016

Exemption No. 15462A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–5788

Mr. Timothy A. Worthy

Tango Whiskey Innovations LLC

1212 Knoll Ridge Drive

Cedar Park, TX 78613

Dear Mr. Worthy:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter posted to the public docket on July 22, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) on behalf of Tango Whiskey Innovations LLC (hereinafter petitioner 

or operator) for an amendment to your current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) 

and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to conduct UAS operations. You 

requested an amendment to change the company name from Tango Whiskey Concepts LLC to 

Tango Whiskey Innovations LLC.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. 

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 15462

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 
2

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 

granted an amendment to change the operator name.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, Tango Whiskey Innovations LLC is hereafter referred to as the 

operator. All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 15462 remain in 

effect. 

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

This exemption terminates on March 31, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Sound Kitchen Entertainment Group,
Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2011, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Alfred Fernandez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: October 7, 2011                  /s/ Alfred Fernandez
                                       --------------------
                                       Alfred Fernandez
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       (Principal Financial Officer)
Case No. 9,917.

#### MULLER et al. v. The IGINIA.

[N. Y. Times,

Jan. 7, 1863.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

Jan., 1863.

Carriers — Maritime Tort — Damage to Cargo— Presumption op Negligence — Pressure— Peril op the Sea.

[1. Damage to cargo raises an inference that it was caused by the carrier’s negligence, rather than by perils of the sea.]

[2. Pressure of one part of a cargo upon another is not a peril of the sea.]

[This was a libel by George J. Muller and others against the ship Iginia, her tackle, etc., for damage to cargo.]

This was a libel filed to recover the value of two casks of wine, shipped, with others, on board the vessel at Antwerp, consigned to the libelants at New York. These two casks, on the arrival of the vessel, were found to be empty. The bill of lading was in the usual form, having the usual exception of losses by perils of sea. These casks were stowed in the ground tier. The evidence was, that the casks themselves were sound, and that they did not shift on the passage over. The respondents proved that the vessel experienced heavy weather, which lasted most of the time for forty days, and that during this time the water brought up by the pumps had a smell of wine. The port warden here certified that the leakage was “apparently caused by working, or pressure of the cargo.”

Kaufman, Frank & Wilcoxson, for libel-ants.

Dukes & Sullivan, for respondents.

Before SHIPMAN, District Judge.

HELD BY THE COURT.

That the burden of proof that the loss was occasioned by the perils of the sea is upon the carriers. The Martha [Case No. 9,145]; Bearse v. Ropes [Id. 1,192]; The Emma Johnson [Id. 4,465]. That if the loss of the wine can be fairly attributed to the force of the gale, which the master" of the vessel took every precaution to provide against, but failed from no fault of his own. then it falls within the exception of the bill of lading. That on the evidence the proximate cause of the damage was the too heavy pressure to which the casks were subjected by the weight of the cargo upon them. That this was a danger which could and should have been provided against, and the consequences of which must be charged to the ship, and not to the sea.

Decree for libelants for ?170.25, the value of the wine, with interest from date of filing the libel.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# CDS Library of Congress

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  CDS Library of Congress 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  Cataloging Distribution Service 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  Library of Congress. Cataloging Distribution Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Country        
                    -  United States 
                    -           State        
                    -  District of Columbia 
                    -           Town        
                    -  Washington 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  161 × 42 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  020968922.jpg; 020968922.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT LUIS VER

DU-DEGREGORIO, Pe t i tione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R e sponde nt. No. 15-73323 Age n c y No. A206-262-982 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the De pa rtm e nt of Hom e la

n d Se c urity Subm itte d Se pte m

be r 27, 2016 * * B e fore : TASHIM A , SILVER M AN, a nd M . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. Luis Ve rdu-De gre gorio, a native and c i tiz e n of Spa in, pe t itions pro se for re vie w of the De pa

rtm e nt of Hom e la

nd Se c urity ’ s (“ DHS” ) fina l a d m i nistra tive re m ova l orde r finding Ve rdu-De gre gorio re m ova ble a s a n a lie n c onvic te d of a

n a ggrav at e d fe lony , a fte r e xpe dite d re m ova l proc e e dings pursua nt to 8 U.S.C . 

# FIL ED OCT 05 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).§ 1228(b). Our jurisdiction is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w de novo

c la im s of due proc e s s viola tions. Singh v . Ashc roft , 367 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th C ir. 2004). W e de ny

in pa rt a nd dismiss in pa

rt the pe tition for re vie w. Ve rdu-De gre gorio doe s not c h a lle nge the DHS’ s de te rm ination tha t he ha s be e n c o nvic te d of a

n a ggravate d fe lony

tha t re nde rs him

re m ova ble unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii). Se eTijani v . Holde r , 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th C ir. 2010) (issue s not ra ise d

in a n ope ning brie f are wa ive d). To thee xte nt tha

t Ve rdu-De gre gorio c o nte nds tha t he did not knowingly wa ive his right to a

ppe a l his re m ova l orde r and re que st withholding of re m ova l, his due proc e ss c la im

fa ils be c a

use he doe s not e xpla in how his due proc e ss rights we re viola

te d in his signing of the

wa ive r, nor did hee sta

b lish a ny re sulting pre j udic e . Se eLata v . IN

S, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th C ir. 2000) (re quiring e rror and pre judic e to pre va il on a

due proc e s s c la i m ). To thee xte nt tha

t Ve rdu-De gre gorio is c olla te ra lly atta c king his underly ing sta te c rim ina l c onvic tion, we la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r this c l a im . Se eRamirezVillalpando v. Holde r , 645 F.3d 1035, 1041 (9th C ir. 2010) (holding tha t pe titioner c ould not c olla

te ra lly atta c k his sta

t e c ourt c onvic t ion on a

pe tition for re vie w of a

n a ge nc y de c ision). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D in par t; DISM ISSE D in par t. 1 5 - 7 3 3 2 3 2