alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Toreador Resources Corporation;(2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;(3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operation and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;(4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     (5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: May 10, 2007/s/ Nigel J. Lovett

Nigel J. LovettPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 15.1 

 

The Shareholders and Board of Directors 

Texas Industries, Inc. 

 

We are aware of theincorporation by reference in the Post-Effective Amendment Number 9 to Registration Statement Number 2-48986 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 33-53715 on Form S-8, and Registration Statement Number 333-11604 on Form S-8, and in the relatedProspectuses of our report dated September 16, 2003 relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Texas Industries, Inc. which are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2003. 

 

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report is not part of theRegistration Statement prepared or certified by accountants within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

October 10, 2003 

Dallas, Texas
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         1065163
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2358337
<ALLOWANCES>                                     50000
<INVENTORY>                                     852654
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4573239
<PP&E>                                         5681953
<DEPRECIATION>                                  995925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                23397917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1363913
<BONDS>                                        1096584
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           770548
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      52951484
<OTHER-SE>                                  (33649165)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  23397917
<SALES>                                        1826821
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3435448
<CGS>                                          1232831
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4225301
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2698
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               86289
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (836382)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (836382)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (836382)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 9748)

#### M & G Importing Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. A/18.

(Decided July 20, 1960)

*W. G. Carroll*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kao, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, — is as follows:

> Lucky Indian Tom Tom *@*$3.80 per Gross

> Net

> Packed

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

> *432IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such value was $3.80 per gross, net packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




|                     |  |     |                           
|-------------------- |  | --- | --------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2022 |  | By: | /s/Justin B. Klee         
|                     |  |     | Justin B. Klee            
|                     |  |     | Co-Chief Executive Officer





---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trinity Capital Corporation, a New Mexico corporation (“Trinity”), for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Daniel R. Bartholomew, as Chief Financial Officer of Trinity, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Trinity. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /s/ Daniel R. Bartholomew |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Daniel R. Bartholomew     |
| Chief Financial Officer   |
| November 9, 2009          |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, CONTAINED IN
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CORPORATION'S 1998 THIRD QUARTER REPORT ON FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             801
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,090
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     82,637
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               768,780
<PP&E>                                       4,205,453
<DEPRECIATION>                                 584,458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,569,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          574,538
<BONDS>                                        975,871
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,026,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,569,966
<SALES>                                        401,533
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               997,752
<CGS>                                          401,533
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  700,092
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              69,158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                162,058
<INCOME-TAX>                                    61,492
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            100,566
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   100,566
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 128631 & (54)(55) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 128631 COA: 250296 Muskegon CC: 02-047104-FC ERNEST NEAL, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 15, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to add issue is GRANTED. The motion to remand is DENIED.

t1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY, 

Plaintiff, Case No. 2:11-cv-1043

JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST

v. Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel

JAMES P. SALYER, ETC., et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff Protective Life Insurance

Company’s Motion to Dismiss Counts I and II of Defendant Karen Saylor’s Counterclaim (ECF

No. 9), Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Deposit Funds and for Discharge (ECF No. 11), and

parties’ Joint Motion for Entry of Agreed Order Granting Protective Life Insurance Company’s

Interpleader and Deposit of Insurance Proceeds with the Court (ECF No. 18). 

The parties’ Joint Motion (ECF No. 18) is GRANTED. In light of the Court’s Order

granting the parties’ Joint Motion and the terms of the agreed order, Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave

(ECF No. 11) and Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9) are DENIED AS MOOT. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Gregory L. Frost 

GREGORY L. FROST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Case: 2:11-cv-01043-GLF-MRA Doc #: 19 Filed: 01/18/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
EARNINGS AND RETAINED EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-26-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<CASH>                               44,166
<SECURITIES>                         63,865
<RECEIVABLES>                        70,944
<ALLOWANCES>                          3,204
<INVENTORY>                          39,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    223,073
<PP&E>                              160,895
<DEPRECIATION>                       79,840
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      490,670
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                67,819
<BONDS>                               7,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             33,315
<OTHER-SE>                          354,507
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        490,670
<SALES>                             299,862
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    299,862
<CGS>                               144,513
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        76,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      3,874
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        254
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      296
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      82,172
<INCOME-TAX>                         29,829
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  52,343
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         52,343
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                          1.09
        

</TABLE>
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2013

- 1004 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2013

- NE

- 34

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into an d then out of the changed cell

.

**Estimated Costs:**

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

co st (@$8 5 /h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Prorated Life Asse ss ment (SP3474EN

- E) 0.0 $ 0.00 $ 

### 15,940 $ 0.00 

### 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00


### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

**On**

**- Condition Costs:** 

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$8 5/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### : 

### N/A

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulator y action”?

YES * NO

* E xplanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:**
Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.
YES NO Explanation:

**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:**
This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transpo rtation?

YES * NO



### * E xplanation 

### :
# C_2008112EN.01001002.xml

| 7.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5072 — AMSSC/BE Group/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 112/05)

On 10 April 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5072. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5072. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Energy technology for a competitive America: Energy Awareness Month, October 1992

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Energy technology for a competitive America: Energy Awareness Month, October 1992 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of Energy 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. Department of Energy 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  157 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  027155564.jpg; 027155564.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer**


**pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted**


**pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002** ****




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NYFIX, Inc. for the
      quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), P. Howard Edelstein, as Chief
      Executive Officer of NYFIX, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to the best of his knowledge the Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NYFIX, Inc.




Dated:
      August 15, 2007


By:/s/
                        P. Howard EdelsteinP.
                  Howard EdelsteinPresident
                        and Chief Executive
                        Officer
No. 47513.

#### Protest 34290-K of Pacific Overseas Trading Co. (Portland, Oreg.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial the protest was submitted without the introduction of evidence in support of the claim made. The papers disclosed nothing to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action. The protest was therefore overruled.
Before the Second Division,

May 24, 1945

No. 50207.

#### Protest 936767-G of Isler & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items of the merchandise consist of hemp knotted straw hats the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 46497, which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the items of merchandise in question were held dutiable as claimed.