alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Regency
Affiliates, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Laurence S. Levy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as
      of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the
      Company for the periods presented.

Dated: December 17, 2007


/s/ Laurence S. Levy
-------------------------------------
Laurence S. Levy
President and Chief Executive Officer
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-50580

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Christopher Davidson, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:20-CR-9-1

Before Higginbotham, Jones, and Costa, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

In this case, Christopher Davidson pleaded guilty to one count of 

possession of a firearm by a felon. During the same rearraignment hearing, 

he pleaded guilty to three counts of a separate indictment: one count of 

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute, and to distribute, 50 grams or 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-50580 Document: 00515828088 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2021
No. 20-50580

2

more of actual methamphetamine and two counts of distribution of five 

grams or more of actual methamphetamine. The district court grouped all 

four counts in calculating his offense level, and he was sentenced on all the 

counts at the same sentencing hearing.

Davidson argues that the district court erred by grouping his firearm 

offense with his drug offenses. Because he did not object to the grouping in 

the district court, plain error review applies. See United States v. Izaguirre, 

973 F.3d 377, 380 (5th Cir. 2020). Davidson’s firearm possession in this case 

was a specific offense characteristic of his drug offenses, as he received the 

two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) based on his firearm 

possession. We have affirmed the § 2D1.1(b)(1) enhancement in Davidson’s 

appeal in No. 20-50579.

As we noted in that appeal, Davidson possessed the firearm near drug 

paraphernalia in his backpack within the time frame of his drug conspiracy 

and less than a week after his two distribution offenses. Because Davidson’s 

firearm possession was a specific offense characteristic of his drug offenses,

the grouping of his firearm and drug offenses was not plainly erroneous. See

U.S.S.G. § 3D1.2(c); United States v. Segler, 37 F.3d 1131, 1135 & n.8 (5th Cir. 

1994); see also United States v. Le, 512 F.3d 128, 134 (5th Cir. 2007) 

(recognizing that we may affirm the district court’s judgment on any basis 

supported by the record).

AFFIRMED.

Case: 20-50580 Document: 00515828088 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2021
#### C. J. Tower *&*Sons *v.*United States

No. 7624.

Entry Nos. 5345; 2343.

— Invoices dated Newmarket, Ontario, Canada, March 19, 1947, etc

•Entered at Niagara Palls, N. Y., March 25, 1947, etc.

*315(Decided November 5, 1948)

*Lamb & Lerch (John 0. Lerch*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General *(Dorothy C. Bennett,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Ekwall, Judge:

These are appeals from findings of value by the appraiser on importations of leather from Canada. Two cases, involving two shipments, have been consolidated for trial. In re-appraisement 164055-A the appraiser found the proper values to he the unit entered prices in Canadian dollars, packed, F. O. B. New-market, Ontario, Canada, to which he added 8 percent Canadian sales tax. This value represented the foreign market value as defined in section 402 (c), as amended by T. D. 49646. In reappraisement 166252-A the importer on entry added under duress to meet advances by the appraiser in reappraisement 164055-A.

It is claimed on behalf of the plaintiff herein that the sales tax is no part of the market value. Counsel for the plaintiff stated at the hearing that there was no dispute as to the *per se*unit prices adopted by the appraiser.

Plaintiff introduced in evidence a copy of the Canadian sales tax law.and also produced the testimony of the sales manager of the exporting company. ■

■ At the conclusion of the hearing Government counsel stated that in view of the fact that the Commissioner of Customs had reversed his position as to the inclusion of this sales tax in the market value since the time of this appraisement, and also in view of the decisions of the Supreme Court and this court, the Government would not press the claim that the 8 percent Canadian sales tax should be included in the foreign value of this merchandise.

• Upon the record as made and in view of the decisions of the courts as set forth in *United States*v. *Passavant,*169 U. S. 16; *Veolay*v. *United States,*23 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 101, T. D. 47766; and *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C: A. D. 334, I find that the proper basis of value herein is the foreign value as defined in section 402 (c), *supra.*I further find that such values are the appraised values, less the item of 8 percent Canadian sales tax-, which forms no part of such value.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
(logo) pwc

  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association (“Midland” or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all transactions serviced on the *Enterprise!*Loan Management System (the “Platform”), as of December31, 2015 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company'scompliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management's assertion that Midland complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 25, 2016

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106 

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*
**Exhibit 8.1**

 

**List of Subsidiaries**

 

**Wholly********Owned Subsidiaries**

 

Lentuo HK Limited

Beijing Anhui Wanxing Science & Technology Co., Ltd.

Beijing Jiashi Shengtong Investment Consulting Co., Ltd.

 

**Consolidated Affiliated Entit****ies**

 

Beijing Tuozhan Industrial & Trading Development Co., Ltd.

Beijing Aotong Automobile Trading Co., Ltd.

Beijing Lentuo Chengxin Commercial & Trading Co., Ltd.

Beijing Yuantongqiao Toyota Automobile Trading Co., Ltd.

Beijing Tuojiacheng Commercial & Trading Co., Ltd.

Beijing Lentuo Huitong Automobile Sales Service Co., Ltd.

Beijing Tuozhan Automobile Repair Co., Ltd.

Beijing Lentuo Automobile Leasing Co., Ltd.

Beijing Lentuo Tongda Automobile Sales Service Co., Ltd.

 

1

----
November 8, 1950

No. 54843.

#### J. Jolles Studios, Inc. v. United States,

protest 4733-K.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
PUBLIC LAW 104–218—OCT. 1, 1996 110 STAT. 3021

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 191:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–796 (Comm. on the Judiciary).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

Sept. 17, considered and passed House.

Sept. 18, considered and passed Senate.

WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 32 (1996):

Oct. 1, Presidential statement.

Æ

Public Law 104–218

104th Congress

Joint Resolution

To confer honorary citizenship of the United States on Agnes Gonxha Bojaxhiu,

also known as Mother Teresa.

Whereas the United States has conferred honorary citizenship on

only three occasions in its more than two hundred years, and

honorary citizenship is and should remain an extraordinary honor

not lightly conferred nor frequently granted;

Whereas Agnes Gonxha Bojaxhiu, better known throughout the

world as Mother Teresa, has worked tirelessly with orphaned

and abandoned children, the poor, the sick, and the dying;

Whereas Mother Teresa founded the Missionaries of Charity in

1950, and has taken in those who have been rejected as ‘‘unacceptable’’ and cared for them when no one else would, regardless

of race, color, creed, or condition;

Whereas Mother Teresa has deservedly received numerous honors,

including the 1979 Nobel Peace Prize and the 1985 Presidential

Medal of Freedom;

Whereas Mother Teresa has worked in areas all over the world,

including the United States, to provide comfort to the world’s

neediest; and

Whereas Mother Teresa through her Missionaries of Charity has

established within the United States numerous soup kitchens,

emergency shelters for women, shelters for unwed mothers, shelters for men, after-school and summer camp programs for children, homes for the dying, prison ministry, nursing homes, and

hospital and shut-in ministry: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Agnes

Gonxha Bojaxhiu, also known as Mother Teresa, is proclaimed

to be an honorary citizen of the United States of America.

Approved October 1, 1996.

Oct. 1, 1996

[H.J. Res. 191]
# Official Journal L 155/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 155 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5819 June 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 155

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5819 June 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2015/929 of the European Central Bank of 26 May 2015 amending Decision ECB/2007/7 concerning the terms and conditions of TARGET2-ECB (ECB/2015/22) | 1 |
| | | GUIDELINES |
| | * | Guideline (EU) 2015/930 of the European Central Bank of 2 April 2015 amending Guideline ECB/2012/27 on a Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross settlement Express Transfer system (TARGET2) (ECB/2015/15) | 38 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Decision (EU) 2015/929 of the European Central Bank of 26 May 2015 amending Decision ECB/2007/7 concerning the terms and conditions of TARGET2-ECB (ECB/2015/22)

1

GUIDELINES

*

Guideline (EU) 2015/930 of the European Central Bank of 2 April 2015 amending Guideline ECB/2012/27 on a Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross settlement Express Transfer system (TARGET2) (ECB/2015/15)

38

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
(Reap. Dec. 8942)

Entry No. 420.

#### Munsingwear, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided July 25, 1957)

*John B. Faegre, Jr.,*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Ford, Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted the appeal listed above upon a stipulation to the effect that the market value or price at or about the date of exportation of the subject merchandise, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including all costs and charges specified in section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930, was as follows:

> *603Item No. HA-1120 Can. $14.30 per doz. pair, net packed

> Item No. H-1121 Can. $15.75 per doz. pair, net packed

It has been further agreed that there was no higher export value for said merchandise.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, I find the proper dutiable foreign value for said merchandise to be as set out above. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Before the Third Division,

May 28, 1958

No. 62027.

#### J. J. Hayes Company *v.*United States,

protest 312799-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
NO. 07-06-0271-CV IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL D JULY 19, 2006

______________________________ In re MICH AEL COX,

Relator

_______________________________ ON PETITION

FOR WRIT

OF MAND

AMUS

_______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS an d CAMPBELL, JJ. Pending before this court is the petition of M ichael Cox for a wri t of mandamus. He requeststhat we or

der the "99 th Distric

t Court to g rant and prov ide [him]” the clerk’s record in cause number 92-415-137 along w ith the court reporte r’s record. We deny the application. The pertinent rul es of procedure obl igate o ne seeking mandamus relief to accompany

his petitio n with an app endix. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.3(j). The latter must i nclude, among other thing s, a certified or swor n copy of the docu ment showing the matter complained of. In this cas e, the document showing the matter complai ned of would be th e motion requesting a copy of the pertinent r

ecords and theorder or or ders denyi ng it. No ne of thos e ite ms wer e pro vided by Cox. And, even though he representsthat the motion and order or orders were mistakenly sent to the C ourt of Cr imin al Ap pea ls, th is do es no t reli eve him from the obliga tion to prov ide sa me with hi s petition for w rit of mandamus. Nor does1 Accordi ng to Cox’ s peti ti on, he requires the trial court r ecords to prep are a peti ti on for h abeas rel ief

under art icl e 11.07 o f th e Texas Code of Crim inal Pro ced ure o f wh ich w e lack jurisd iction. See In r e Trevi no , 79 S.W .3d 794 ( Tex. App. – Corpus Chri sti 2002) ( ori g. pr oceeding ) (wher ein t he courtheld that itlac ked juri sdict ion over a p eti ti on for mandamus reli ef when re lat or was requ esti ng courtrecords to aid in prepari ng an 11.07 writ). 2 his status as a pro se litigant reliev e him of

complying with the rules of procedur e. Holt v. F.F. Enters. , 990 S.W .2d 756, 759 (Tex. App.– Amarillo 1998, pet. den ied). 1 Acco rdin gly, the petition for writ of mandamus pending befor e this court is denied.

Per Curiam
Case: 2:12-cv-00893-EAS-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 10/04/12 Page: 1 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00893-EAS-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 10/04/12 Page: 2 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00893-EAS-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 10/04/12 Page: 3 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00893-EAS-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 10/04/12 Page: 4 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00893-EAS-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 10/04/12 Page: 5 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00893-EAS-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 10/04/12 Page: 6 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00893-EAS-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 10/04/12 Page: 7 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00893-EAS-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 10/04/12 Page: 8 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00893-EAS-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 10/04/12 Page: 9 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00893-EAS-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 10/04/12 Page: 10 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00893-EAS-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 10/04/12 Page: 11 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00893-EAS-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 10/04/12 Page: 12 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00893-EAS-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 10/04/12 Page: 13 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00893-EAS-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 10/04/12 Page: 14 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00893-EAS-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 10/04/12 Page: 15 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00893-EAS-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 10/04/12 Page: 16 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00893-EAS-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 10/04/12 Page: 17 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00893-EAS-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 10/04/12 Page: 18 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T13:18:35-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Quarterly Report ofTodhunter International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (this “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) theinformation contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition of the Company as of March 31, 2004 and its results ofoperations for the period ended March 31, 2004.

 
|   |   /s/  Jay S. Maltby                                |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Jay S. Maltby                                                 |
|   | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer  And President |

 

 

Date:  May 12, 2004

 

----
7/27/2015 DJI­Checklist1.jpg (754×953)

http://dronelife.com/wp­content/uploads/2014/10/DJI­Checklist1.jpg 1/1
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 11, 2015

No. 04-12-00430-CR

Charles ARRINGTON,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR1663

Honorable Sharon MacRae, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Appellant’s Motion for Leave to File Post-Remand Memorandum of Law is GRANTED.

Appellant’s request that this appeal be submitted for oral argument is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on the 11th day of March, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

ALLANDRO GROSE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

BRET MILLER,

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action 2:11-cv-191

Judge Peter C. Economus

Magistrate Judge E.A. Preston Deavers

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on January 4, 2012 for a telephonic status conference

following the parties' Joint Motion for Stay. Counsel for Plaintiff indicates that he must move to

withdraw in this case because he has been unable to communicate with his client. Counsel will

file his Motion to Withdraw on or before JANUARY 13, 2012. If the Motion to Withdraw is

granted, the Court will schedule a status conference at which Plaintiff must appear in person or

through another attorney. Plaintiff's failure to appear and participate in this case may result in

dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute.1

The parties' Joint Motion for Stay is GRANTED until such time as matters of Plaintiff's

legal representation are resolved or by further Order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: January 4, 2012 /s/ Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers 

ELIZABETH A. PRESTON DEAVERS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1 Counsel for Plaintiff is DIRECTED to forward a copy of this Order to Plaintiff

at his last known residence.

Case: 2:11-cv-00191-PCE-EPD Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/04/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 168 

Expressing gratitude and sincere respect for Jesse R. Nichols. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 13, 2005 

Mr. FRIST (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, and Mr. BAUCUS) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing gratitude and sincere respect for Jesse R. 

Nichols. 

Whereas Jesse R. Nichols, Sr., faithfully served the United 

States Senate and the Committee on Finance as the Government Documents Clerk and Librarian from 1937 

through 1971; 

Whereas Jesse R. Nichols, Sr., was born on June 14, 1909, 

in Clarksdale, Mississippi, and was the first African 

American Clerk employed by the United States Senate; 

Whereas he carried out his duties in exemplary fashion, 

bringing credit to the Committee and to Congress; 

Whereas Jesse Nichols worked effectively under the guidance 

of Democratic and Republican Chairmen, including Pat 

Harrison of Mississippi, Walter F. George of Georgia, 

Harry Flood Byrd of Virginia and Russell B. Long of 
2 

SRES 168 ATS

Louisiana from the Seventy-Fifth Congress through the 

Ninety-First Congress; and 

Whereas the Committee on Finance will long remember the 

commitment, service and leadership of Jesse R. Nichols, 

Sr., as documented in an oral history posted on the Senate Historian’s website: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the United States Senate expresses its 

2 deep gratitude and sincere respect for Jesse R. Nichols 

3 for his unfailing service and his dedication to the United 

4 States Senate. The Senate hereby expresses condolences 

5 to the family due to the death of Jesse R. Nichols, Sr., 

6 on February 18, 2005. 

Æ