alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 24  POWER OF ATTORNEY  The undersigned directors and officers of Jialijia Group Corporation Limited, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), hereby constitute and appoint Na Jin with full power to act, as the undersigned’s true and lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for the undersigned and in the undersigned’s name, place and stead in the undersigned’s capacity as an officer and/or director of the Company, to execute in the name and on behalf of the undersigned an annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”), under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and to file such Report, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith and any and all amendments thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done and to take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to, in the best interest of, or legally required of, the undersigned, it being understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such attorney-in-fact’s discretion.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 15th day of April, 2022.   /s/ Na JinDirector, Chief Executive Officer,April 15, 2022Na JinChief Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Dongzhi ZhangChairman of the BoardApril 15, 2022Dongzhi Zhang/s/ Jiannan WuDirectorApril 15, 2022Jiannan Wu
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9042 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9042

To provide for civilian agency artificial intelligence watermarks, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 15, 2024

 Ms. Jackson Lee introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for civilian agency artificial intelligence watermarks, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Civilian Agency AI Watermark Act''.

SEC. 2. CIVILIAN AGENCY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WATERMARK SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--Not later than eight months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall seek to 
consult with the Director of the National Institute of Standards and 
Technology and the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark 
Office regarding development of an artificial intelligence watermark 
and trademark system to identify Federal agency approved artificial 
intelligence applications for civilian agency use.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of Homeland Security each fiscal year to 
carry out this section such sums as may be necessary.
                                 <all>
```
#### United States *v.*Fred L. Cole

No. 7602.

Entry No. 5-C.

— Invoice dated Mexico, D. F., September 11, 1947. Certified September 11, 1947.

Entered at Corpus Christi, Tex., September 29, 1947.

(Decided June 18, 1948)

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Richard H..Welsh,*special attorney), for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Johnson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States — is as follows:

Azulejos — Decorados 11 x 11_ Mex. $0.55 each

Azulejos — Típicos varios, 11 x 11_ 2.00 each

Packing included. Tax (1.65%) extra.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

*269On tbe agreed facts I find tbe export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of tbe merchandise bere involved, and

tbat sucb values were as follows:

Azulejos — Decorados 11 x 11_ Mex. $0.55 each

Azulejos — Típicos varios, 11 x 11_ 2.00 each

Packing included. Tax (1.65%) extra.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Case: 2:12-cv-00726-NMK Doc #: 23 Filed: 08/02/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-00726-NMK Doc #: 23 Filed: 08/02/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
(Reap. Dec. 9331)

#### New York Hanseatic Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. A-15.

(Decided February 27, 1959)

*Eugene B. Pickrell*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*511Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain sodium trichloracetate exported from West Germany and entered at the port of Hilo, T.H.

Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of this merchandise is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value therefor is $330.84 per 1,000 kilos, plus cost of packing and labor in packing, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 18, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41155

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HILARIO HERNANDEZ-PINEDA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:06-CR-157-ALL

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Hilario Hernandez-Pineda has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hernandez-Pineda has

not filed a response. 

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 275 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 275

  Designating the week of February 6, 2006 as ``National Teen Dating 
               Violence Awareness and Prevention Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 18, 2005

 Mr. Crapo (for himself, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Durbin, Mr. 
    Akaka, Ms. Murkowski, Mrs. Murray, and Mr. Biden) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating the week of February 6, 2006 as ``National Teen Dating 
               Violence Awareness and Prevention Week''.

Whereas 1 in 3 female high school students reports being physically abused or 
        sexually abused by a dating partner;
Whereas over 40 percent of male and female high school students surveyed had 
        been victims of dating violence at least once;
Whereas violent relationships in adolescence can have serious ramifications for 
        victims, who are at higher risk for substance abuse, eating disorders, 
        risky sexual behavior, suicide, and adult re-victimization;
Whereas the severity of violence among intimate partners has been shown to 
        increase if the pattern was established in adolescence;
Whereas 81 percent of parents surveyed either believed dating violence is not a 
        problem or admitted they did not know it is a problem; and
Whereas the establishment of a ``National Teen Dating Violence Awareness and 
        Prevention Week'' will benefit schools, communities, and families 
        regardless of socio-economic status, race, or gender: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of February 6, 2006 as ``National 
        Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Week''; and
            (2) calls on the people of the United States, especially 
        high schools, law enforcement, local, and State officials, and 
        interested groups to observe the week with appropriate 
        activities that promote awareness and prevention of the crime 
        of teen dating violence in our communities.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2008261EN.01000701.xml

| 14.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 October 2008

(2008/C 261/05)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3639 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,63 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4526 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,7854 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6689 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5416 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 305 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4285 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,653 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 253 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7092 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,5576 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,7827 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,56 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9216 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 2,032 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5903 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,587 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,2551 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0043 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 680,32 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,6035 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,3097 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,142 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 393,5 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7757 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,24 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,6393 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,707 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,022 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,2407 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3639

JPY

Japanese yen

136,63

DKK

Danish krone

7,4526

GBP

Pound sterling

0,7854

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6689

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5416

ISK

Iceland króna

305

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4285

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,653

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

253

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7092

PLN

Polish zloty

3,5576

RON

Romanian leu

3,7827

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,56

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9216

AUD

Australian dollar

2,032

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5903

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,587

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,2551

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0043

KRW

South Korean won

1 680,32

ZAR

South African rand

12,6035

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,3097

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,142

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 393,5

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7757

PHP

Philippine peso

64,24

RUB

Russian rouble

35,6393

THB

Thai baht

46,707

BRL

Brazilian real

3,022

MXN

Mexican peso

17,2407

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 27, 2019

izm

Order 

Clerk

December 27, 2019

160727 (23)

In re GEETER 

___________________________________________ 

CHARLES LAMONT GEETER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 160727 

COA: 350482 

OAKLAND CIRCUIT COURT, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it is 

DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable 

for filing fees.

Initially, MCL 600.2963(8) does not bar the present application based on 

outstanding fees appellant owes this Court in Geeter v Chippewa Corr Facility Warden, 

SC 156253 under In re Jackson, 326 Mich App 629 (2018) because this application relates 

to an underlying criminal case and it is manifest that appellant cannot currently pay the 

outstanding fees.

Appellant is not required to pay an initial partial fee. However, for an appeal to be 

filed, within 21 days of the date of this order, appellant shall submit a copy of this 

order and refile the copy of the pleadings returned with this order. By doing this, 

appellant becomes responsible to pay the $375.00 filing fee. Failure to comply with this 

order shall result in the dismissal of this application.

If appellant timely refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the 

Department of Corrections in the amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to appellant’s 

account until the payments equal the balance due of $375.00. This amount shall then be 

remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8), appellant shall not file a new civil action or appeal 

in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to appellant and return 

a copy of appellant’s pleadings with this order.
# Official Journal C 466A/18 N

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 466A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6418 November 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 466A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6418 November 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2021/C 466 A/01 | Notice of open competition – EPSO/AD/396/21 – Irish-language (GA) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2021/C 466 A/01

Notice of open competition – EPSO/AD/396/21 – Irish-language (GA) lawyer-linguists (AD 7)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
No. 54835.

#### Jean R. Graef, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 161236-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Case: 2:11-cv-00817-EAS-NMK Doc #: 19 Filed: 09/06/12 Page: 1 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00817-EAS-NMK Doc #: 19 Filed: 09/06/12 Page: 2 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00817-EAS-NMK Doc #: 19 Filed: 09/06/12 Page: 3 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T16:58:30-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
No. 54199.

#### Caron Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 143524-K, 145028-K, and 151345-K (New York).

*419Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Free tax help VITA, volunteer income tax assistance

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Free tax help VITA, volunteer income tax assistance 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Internal Revenue Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. Internal Revenue Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Publication ; no. 729; Publication (United States. Internal Revenue Service) ; 729. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  154 × 40 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  024528886.jpg; 024528886.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-1324 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-104-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Supreme Court of Florida

____________

No. SC21-1327

____________

CANDIE LYNN WALKER,

Petitioner,

vs.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

January 6, 2022

LAWSON, J.

Petitioner, Candie Lynn Walker, through counsel, seeks to 

invoke this Court’s discretionary jurisdiction under article V, 

section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution, which allows us to 

review, among other things, “any decision of a district court of 

appeal that . . . expressly and directly conflicts with a decision of 

another district court of appeal . . . on the same question of law.” 

Counsel’s jurisdictional brief argues that we are empowered to 

review the First District Court of Appeal’s decision in Walker v. 

State, 324 So. 3d 60 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021), because it conflicts with a 
- 2 -

decision in another case “decided in the same district court of 

appeal.” This argument is contrary to the plain language of our 

constitution, which only grants discretionary jurisdiction under this 

clause when a decision from one district court “conflicts with a 

decision of another district court of appeal.” Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. 

Const. (emphasis added). Not surprisingly, our precedent also 

makes clear that “[t]his Court’s jurisdiction does not extend to 

intra-district conflict.” Terry v. State, 808 So. 2d 1249, 1250 n.1 

(Fla. 2002).

Because the only jurisdictional argument presented in 

Walker’s brief is contrary to our constitution and precedent, we 

deny Walker’s petition.

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, MUÑIZ, COURIEL, and 

GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION 

AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal

Direct Conflict of Decisions

First District - Case No. 1D20-608

(Escambia County)
- 3 -

Philip J. Massa of Philip J. Massa, P.A., West Palm Beach, Florida,

for Petitioner

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Welch, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida,

for Respondent