alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case No. 9,890.

#### MOWER et al. v. BURDICK.

[4 McLean, 7.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Michigan.

June Term, 1845.

■ Pleading at Law — Plea—Tkavekse—Augumen-tativelt Denied.

A plea which argumentatively denies a fact averred in the declaration, is demurrable. The traverse must be direct.

[This was a proceeding by Mower and Stevens against Burdick.]

Barstow & Douglass, for plaintiffs.

Joy & Porter, for defendant.

1

 [Reported by Hon. John McLean, Circuit Justice.]

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

This action i is brought upon a sealed instrument, dated the 0th of June, 1839, in which the defendant agreed to indemnify the plaintiffs and save them harmless against the payment of a certain promissory note, made and signed by the plaintiffs jointly and severally, with one Samuel Mower, then of Michigan City, Indiana, for the sum of seventeen hundred dollars, payable in one year, for the benefit and ¡ use of the said Samuel Mower. And the plaintiffs aver, that on the 12th day of July, 1842, they paid the said note. The second count in the declaration was substantially tlie same on another note.

The defendant pleaded that the said Samuel Mower did himself take up and pay each of the said several promissory notes when they became due, without this, that the said plaintiffs paid the sums due upon the said promis-sor.v notes when they became due, or any part of all or either of them in manner and form, etc., which the said defendant is ready to verify. To this plea, the plaintiffs demurred. This plea is bad. The plaintiffs aver that they paid the notes after they became due; the plea alleges that Mower paid them when they became due, which is not a direct answer to the averment in the declaration. This may be a good argument to show that the plaintiffs could not have paid the notes as they allege, but it is an argumentative denial of the fact stated in the deelaration, which should be traversed. Steph. PI. 173-177, 1S1, 3S5. The case was discontinued.
Exhibit 13.1  Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Bona Film Group Limited (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2012as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dong Yu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: April 29, 2013  By:
/s/ Dong YuName:
Dong YuTitle:
Chief Executive Officer  1
CERTIFICATION

OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Staffing 360° Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2012 (the “Report”),
I, Allan Hartley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.    The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.    The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: September 13, 2012 | /s/ Allan Hartley                                            
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                         | Allan Hartley                                                
|                         | Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer)



|Date: September 13, 2012 | /s/ Adam Wasserman                                                                            
|------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         | Adam Wasserman                                                                                
|                         | Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
from within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2007307EN.01000402.xml

| 18.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 307/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 307/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4909 — Nissan Forklift/Atlet)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 307/05)

On 12 October 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4909. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4909. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
# C_2009007EN.01000302.xml

| 13.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5264 — Invitrogen/Applied Biosystems)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 7/03)

On 11 November 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5264. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5264. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trinity Capital Corporation, a New Mexico corporation (“Trinity”), for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Daniel R. Bartholomew, as Chief Financial Officer of Trinity, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Trinity. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /s/ Daniel R. Bartholomew |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Daniel R. Bartholomew     |
| Chief Financial Officer   |
| August 17, 2009           |
# Official Journal L 386/29 D

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 386 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4729 December 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 386

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4729 December 2004

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 2216/2004 of 21 December 2004 for a standardised and secured system of registries pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Decision No 280/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 2216/2004 of 21 December 2004 for a standardised and secured system of registries pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Decision No 280/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Appendix G

Air Quality
# L_2013210EN.01S00302.xml

| 6.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 210/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 210/s3

---

NOTE TO READERS — WAY OF REFERRING TO ACTS

As of 1 July 2013 the way of referring to acts has changed.

During a transitional period this new practice will coexist with the previous one.

---
**Exhibit 12.2**

**302 CERTIFICATION**

I,Javier Galán A., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Enersis Chile S.A.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its combined subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: April 29, 2016
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# National Library of Medicine: new frontiers in health communication, sesquicentennial, 1836-1986

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  National Library of Medicine: new frontiers in health communication, sesquicentennial, 1836-1986 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  National Library of Medicine 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  National Library of Medicine (U.S.) 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018277863.jpg; 018277863.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8931 

To redesignate Saratoga National Historical Park as Saratoga National 

Battlefield Park. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 2, 2024 

Ms. STEFANIK (for herself and Mr. TONKO) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To redesignate Saratoga National Historical Park as 

Saratoga National Battlefield Park. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SARATOGA NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD PARK. 

4 (a) REDESIGNATION.—Saratoga National Historical 

5 Park shall hereafter be known and designated as ‘‘Sara6 toga National Battlefield Park’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to Saratoga National Historical Park shall be 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8931 IH

1 deemed to be a reference to Saratoga National Battlefield 

2 Park. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 50624.

#### Protest 58433-K/12314 of Shabby Shoppe, Inc. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record *308was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoice should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry. The protest was sustained to this extent.
#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7549.

Entry No. 753625, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, April 17, 1942, etc.

Certified April 20,-1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 5, 1942, etc.

(Decided February 20, 1948)

*John R. Rafter*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

Undisputed facts establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise is export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), and that such statutory values for the articles in question are the appraised values, less additions made *on entry*because of advances in similar cases.
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 2015 - 3877 Directorate ID : 2015 - SW - 039 - AD Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters Model AS332C, AS332C1, AS332L , and AS332L 1 Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 19 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to detect and prevent structural damage to the tail rotor (T/R) blades caused by overheating, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 167,644 (4 -blade T/R se t) $209,555 (5 -blade T/R set) Labor per Helicopter ( 1 work - hour X $85 for inspection ) (2 work - hours X $85 for deactivation ) (0.5 work - hour X $85 for RFM revision ) (0.5 work - hour X $85 for placard) (3 work - hours X $85 for blade replacement ) $ 85 $ 170 $43 $43 $255 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $85 per inspection $170 for the deactivation $43 for the RFM revision $43 for the placard $167,899 (replacement, 4 -blade T/R set) $209,810 (replacement, 5 -blade T/R set) Total U . S . Flee t Cost $1,615 per inspection $3,230 for the deactivation $817 for the RFM revision $817 for the placard Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  )2

Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : George Schwab
# C_2007269EN.01006401.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/64

---

Action brought on 18 September 2007 — Pfizer v OHIM — Isdin (ISDIN Pediatrícs)

(Case T-355/07)

(2007/C 269/116)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Pfizer Ltd (Sandwich, United Kingdom) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, A. Renck, T. Dolde, lawyers, and M. Hawkins, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Isdin, SA (Barcelona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 June 2007 in Case R 566/2006-1; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 June 2007 in Case R 566/2006-1; and

| — | order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The figurative mark ‘ISDIN Pediatrícs’ for products in among others class 5 — Community trade mark No 1 243 807

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Isdin, SA

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: The national word mark ‘ISTIN’ for goods in class 5

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Partial declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the Cancellation Division's decision insofar as it declared the invalidity of the Community trade mark

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Violation of the applicant's right to be heard pursuant to Article 73 of Council Regulation No 40/94 and violation of Article 52 read in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of the regulation.

Pleas in law:

---