Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 12 / Friday, January 19, 2007 / Notices 2511 

the system, select ‘‘docket search,’’ then 

key in the docket ID number identified 

above. Please note that EPA’s policy is 

that public comments, whether 

submitted electronically or in paper, 

will be made available for public 

viewing at www.regulations.gov, as EPA 

receives them and without change, 

unless the comment contains 

copyrighted material, CBI, or other 

information whose public disclosure is 

restricted by statute. For further 

information about the electronic docket, 

go to www.regulations.gov. 

Title: NESHAP for the Printing and 

Publishing Industry (Renewal). 

ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 

1739.05, OMB Control Number 2060–

0335. 

ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to 

expire on January 31, 2007. Under OMB 

regulations, the Agency may continue to 

conduct or sponsor the collection of 

information while this submission is 

pending at OMB. An Agency may not 

conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 

required to respond to, a collection of 

information unless it displays a 

currently valid OMB control number. 

The OMB control numbers for EPA’s 

regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after 

appearing in the Federal Register when 

approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, 

are displayed either by publication in 

the Federal Register or by other 

appropriate means, such as on the 

related collection instrument or form, if 

applicable. The display of OMB control 

numbers in certain EPA regulations is 

consolidated in 40 CFR part 9. 

Abstract: The Maximum Achievable 

Control Technology (NESHAP) for the 

Printing and Publishing Industry were 

promulgated on May 30, 1996 (61 FR 

27131). These standards apply to the 

following facilities in 40 CFR part 63, 

subpart KK: publication rotogravure, 

product and packaging rotogravure, and 

wide-web flexographic printing presses 

at major sources. The effective date was 

May 30, 1999, for sources existing on 

May 30, 1996. For new sources or 

reconstructed sources after May 30, 

1996, the effective date of startup is May 

30, 1996, whichever is later. 

These standards of performance for 

this category of major sources and area 

sources of hazardous air pollutants are 

required by section 112 of the Clean Air 

Act. Facilities may meet the standards 

by materials substitution, by installing 

control devices, or by a combination of 

both. The information that is required to 

be submitted to the Agency or kept at 

the facility is needed to insure 

compliance with the regulation. These 

include initial one time notifications, 

performance test plans and reports and 

records of maintenance and shutdown, 

startup, and malfunctions. The required 

notifications are used to inform the 

Agency or delegated authority when a 

source becomes subject to the standard. 

The reviewing authority may then 

inspect the source to check if the 

pollution control devices are properly 

installed and operated, leaks are being 

detected and repaired and the standard 

is being met. Performance test reports 

are needed as these are the Agency’s 

records of a source’s initial capability to 

comply with the emission standard, and 

serve as a record of the operating 

conditions under which compliance 

was achieved. For facilities that install 

continuous monitoring systems (CMS) 

there are performance test and 

maintenance reports. Excess emissions 

reports are submitted semiannually. 

Responses to the information collection 

are mandatory under Clean Air Act 

section 112 and 40 CFR part 63, subpart 

KK. The responses are not anticipated to 

be kept confidential due to the nature of 

the information collected; however, any 

information submitted to the Agency for 

which claim of confidentiality is made 

will be safeguarded according to the 

Agency policy set forth in 40 CFR part 

2. 

Burden Statement: The annual public 

reporting and recordkeeping burden for 

this collection of information are 

estimated to average 100 hours per 

response. Burden means the total time, 

effort, or financial resources expended 

by persons to generate, maintain, retain, 

or disclose or provide information to or 

for a Federal agency. This includes the 

time needed to review instructions; 

develop, acquire, install, and utilize 

technology and systems for the purposes 

of collecting, validating, and verifying 

information, processing and 

maintaining information, and disclosing 

and providing information; adjust the 

existing ways to comply with any 

previously applicable instructions and 

requirements; train personnel to be able 

to respond to a collection of 

information; search data sources; 

complete and review the collection of 

information; and transmit or otherwise 

disclose the information. 

Respondents/Affected Entities: 

Owners or operators of publication 

rotogravure, product and packaging 

rotogravure, or wide-web flexographic 

printing presses. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

352. 

Frequency of Response: Initially, on 

occasion, and semiannually. 

Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 

50,796. 

Estimated Total Capital and 

Operations & Maintenance (O&M) 

Annual Costs: $412,000, which includes 

$7,000 annualized capital/startup costs 

and $405,000 annual O&M costs. 

Changes in the Estimates: There is no 

change in the labor hours or cost in this 

ICR compared to the previous ICR. This 

is due to two considerations. First, the 

regulations have not changed over the 

past three years and are not anticipated 

to change over the next three years. 

Secondly, the growth rate for the 

industry is very low, negative or nonexistent, so there is no significant 

change in the overall burden. 

Since there are no changes in the 

regulatory requirements and there is no 

significant industry growth, the labor 

hours and cost figures in the previous 

ICR are used in this ICR and there is no 

change in burden to industry. 

Dated: January 8, 2007. 

Oscar Morales, 

Director, Collection Strategies Division. 

[FR Doc. E7–698 Filed 1–18–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–6683–3] 

Environmental Impact Statements and 

Regulations; Availability of EPA 

Comments 

Availability of EPA comments 

prepared pursuant to the Environmental 

Review Process (ERP), under section 

309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 

102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 

Policy Act as amended. Requests for 

copies of EPA comments can be directed 

to the Office of Federal Activities at 

202–564–7167. An explanation of the 

ratings assigned to draft environmental 

impact statements (EISs) was published 

in the Federal Register dated April 7, 

2006 (71 FR 17845). 

Draft EISs 

EIS No. 20060402, ERP No. D–NOA–

K39102–CA, Cordell Bank, Gulf of the 

Farallones and Monterey Bay National 

Marine Sanctuaries, Proposes a Series 

of Regulatory Changes, Offshore of 

Northern/Central, CA. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed project. Rating LO. 

EIS No. 20060461, ERP No. D-USNE11061-FL, Boca Chica Field, 

Restoration of Clear Zones and 

Stormwater Drainage Systems, 

Implementation, Naval Air Station 

(NAS) Key West, Monroe County, FL. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about wetlands 

and mangrove forest impacts. EPA 

recommended that the final document 

include an analysis of the 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
2512 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 12 / Friday, January 19, 2007 / Notices 

comprehensive vegetative control 

maintenance program and a thorough 

discussion of the overall monitoring and 

adaptive management plan. Rating EC2. 

EIS No. 20060465, ERP No. D–FRC–

H03002–00, Rockies Express Western 

Phase Project, Construction and 

Operation for the Natural Gas Pipeline 

Facilities: Rockies Express (CP06–

354–000), TransColorado (CP06–401–

000) and Overthrust (CP06–423–000), 

CO, WY, NE, KS, MO and NM. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about potential 

impacts to air and water quality, and 

requested that additional information be 

provided to disclose cumulative impacts 

of new gas-fueled compression stations, 

and to evaluate specific hydrostatic test 

water acquisition and discharge 

considerations. Rating EC2. 

EIS No. 20060472, ERP No. D–MMS–

A02245–00, Gulf of Mexico Outer 

Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Lease 

Sales: 2007–2012 Western Planning 

Area Sales 204, 207, 210, 215, and 

218: Central Planning Area Sales 205, 

206, 208, 213, 216, and 222, TX, LA, 

MS, AL and Fl. 

Summary: While EPA had no 

objections to the proposed action, EPA 

did request clarification in the areas of 

hypoxia research, National Estuarine 

Research Reserve, National Estuary 

Program, air/water quality impacts, 

cumulative impacts and mitigation. 

Rating LO. 

Final EISs 

EIS No. 20060454, ERP No. F–SFW–

K99035–CA, Orange County Southern 

Subregion Habitat Conservation Plan 

(HCP), Implementation, Application 

for and Incidental Take Permit, 

Orange County, CA. 

Summary: EPA’s previous concerns 

about air and water quality impacts 

have been resolved; therefore, EPA does 

not object to the proposed action. 

EIS No. 20060463, ERP No. F–CGD–

G11047–00, Beacon Port Deepwater 

Port License Application, 

Construction and Operation, 

Deepwater Port and Offshore Pipeline, 

U.S. COE Section 404 and 10 Permits, 

Gulf of Mexico, San Patricio County, 

TX. 

Summary: Should the applicant 

decide to re-apply, EPA will work with 

USCG and MARAD to resolve any 

continuing issues about the proposed 

use of an open rack vaporization regasification system. 

EIS No. 20060474, ERP No. F–BLM–

G65099–NM, Kasha-Katuwe Tent 

Rocks National Monument Resource 

Management Plan, Implementation, 

Rio Puerco Field Office, Sandoval 

County, NM. 

Summary: No formal comment letter 

was sent to the preparing agency. 

EIS No. 20060476, ERP No. F–SFW–

K64022–CA, Aquatic Habitat 

Conservation Plan and Candidate 

Conservation Agreement with 

Assurances to Conserve Habitat for 

and Mitigate Impacts on Six Aquatic 

Species, USFWS Enhancement of 

Survival Permit and an USNMF 

Incidental Take Permit Issuance, 

Humboldt and Del Norte Counties, 

CA. 

Summary: EPA continues to have 

environmental concerns about 

temperature effects from temporary 

reductions in canopy cover and 

recommended additional prescriptions 

for areas showing temperature impacts 

under pre-project conditions. 

EIS No. 20060499, ERP No. F–COE–

G36156–AR, Bayou Meto Basin, 

Arkansas General Reevaluation 

Project, Address Waterfowl 

Management, Water Supply and 

Flood Control Strategies, Located in 

Portions of Lonoke, Prairie, Jefferson, 

Arkansas and Pulaski Counties, AR. 

Summary: No formal comment letter 

was sent to the preparing agency. 

EIS No. 20060534, ERP No. F–NOA–

E91017–00, Gulf of Mexico Red 

Snapper Total Allowable Catch and 

Reduce Bycatch in the Gulf of Mexico 

Directed and Shrimp Trawl Fisheries, 

To Evaluate Alternatives, Gulf of 

Mexico. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed action. 

Dated: January 16, 2007. 

Clifford Rader, 

Environmental Protection Specialist, Office 

of Federal Activities. 

[FR Doc. E7–697 Filed 1–18–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–6683–2] 

Environmental Impacts Statements; 

Notice of Availability 

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal 

Activities, General Information (202) 

564–7167 or http://www.epa.gov/ 

compliance/nepa/. 

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact 

Statements 

Filed 01/08/2007 through 01/12/2007 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9. 

EIS No. 20070007, Draft EIS, NPS, NM, 

Bandelier National Monument, 

Ecological Restoration Plan, 

Reestablish Healthy, Sustainable 

Vegetative Conditions within the 

Pinon-Juniper Woodland, Los Alamos 

and Sandoval Counties, NM, 

Comment Period Ends: 03/19/2007, 

Contact: John Mack 505–672–3861–

Ext 568. 

EIS No. 20070008, Draft EIS, AFS, 00, 

Great Basin Creek South Rangeland 

Management Projects, Management of 

12 Livestock Grazing Allotments, 

Bridgeport Ranger District, Lyon and 

Mineral Counties, NV and Mono 

County, CA, Comment Period Ends: 

03/05/2007, Contact: David Loomis 

775–884–8132. 

EIS No. 20070009, Final EIS, AFS, 00, 

Antelope-Pardee 500kV Transmission 

Project, Construct, Operate and 

Maintain a New 25.6 mile 500kV 

Transmission Line, Right-of-Way 

Permit and Special Use 

Authorization, Angeles National 

Forest, Los Angeles County, CA, Wait 

Period Ends: 02/20/2007, Contact: 

John Boccio 415–703–2641. 

EIS No. 20070010, Final EIS, FHW, LA, 

East-West Corridor Highway 

Component, from I–130 to Louis 

Armstrong International Airport, to 

Central Business District (CBD), 

Jefferson, Orleans and St. Charles 

Parishes, LA, Wait Period Ends: 02/ 

20/2007, Contact: Robert Mahoney 

225–757–7624. 

EIS No. 20070011, Draft EIS, FHW, MI, 

I–94 Jackson Freeway Modernization 

Project, Improvements between 

Michigan State Route-60 (MI–60) and 

Sargent Road, Funding and NPDES 

and U.S. Army COE Section 404 

Permits Issuance, Jackson County, MI, 

Comment Period Ends: 02/20/2007, 

Contact: David Calabrese 517–702–

1825. 

Amended Notices 

EIS No. 20060471, Draft EIS, FHW, IL, 

Prairie Parkway Study, Transportation 

System Improvement between 

Interstate 80 (I–80) and Interstate 88 

(I–88) Grundy, Kendall and Kane 

Counties, IL, Comment Period Ends: 

02/28/2007, Contact: Matt Fuller 217–

492–4625. Revision of FR Notice 

Published 11/17/2006: Extending 

Comment Period from 01/16/2007 to 

02/28/2007. 

EIS No. 20060490, Draft EIS, OSM, 00, 

Black Mesa Project, Revisions to the 

Life-of-Mine Operation and 

Reclamation for the Kayenta and 

Black Mesa Surface-Coal Mining 

Operations, Right-of-Way Grant, 

Mohave, Navajo, Coconino and 

Yavapai Counties, AZ and Clark 

County, NV, Comment Period Ends: 

02/06/2007, Contact: Peter A. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES