alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 219 (Tuesday, November 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 67627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27455]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Nevada Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that a meeting of the Nevada 
Advisory Committee (Committee) to the Commission will convene on 
Wednesday, December 12, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. and adjourn at approximately 
3:00 p.m. The meeting will take place at the Department of Employment, 
Training and Rehabilitation, 2800 East St. Louis Ave., Las Vegas, 
Nevada 89104. The purpose of the meeting is for the Committee to 
consider a draft report on bullying in public schools and plan future 
activities.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the Western Regional Office by January 12, 
2013. The mailing address is Western Regional Office, U.S. Commission 
on Civil Rights, 300 N. Los Angeles St., Suite 2010, Los Angeles, CA 
90032. Persons wishing to email their comments may do so to 
atrevino@usccr.gov. Persons that desire additional information should 
contact Angelica Trevino, Office Manager, Western Regional Office, at 
(213) 894-3437. Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting 
and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact 
the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Western Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Western Regional Office at the above 
email or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, November 6, 2012.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2012-27455 Filed 11-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
IIA 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 1 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating 

to marriage. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2005 

Mr. ALLARD (for himself, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. LOTT, Mr. ENZI, Mr. DEMINT, 

Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. VITTER, Mr. THUNE, 

Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. FRIST, Mr. TALENT, Mr. BURR, Mrs. HUTCHISON, 

Mr. KYL, Mrs. DOLE, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. MCCONNELL, 

Mr. HATCH, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. STEVENS, and Mr. 

COBURN) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relating to marriage. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 
2 

•SJ 1 IS 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. This article may be cited as the ‘Mar3 riage Protection Amendment’. 

4 ‘‘SECTION 2. Marriage in the United States shall con5 sist only of the union of a man and a woman. Neither 

6 this Constitution, nor the constitution of any State, shall 

7 be construed to require that marriage or the legal inci8 dents thereof be conferred upon any union other than the 

9 union of a man and a woman.’’. 

Æ
# C_2009008EN.01S00301.xml

| 13.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided to no longer quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
# CA2008025EN.01001801.xml

| 30.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 25/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 25/18

---

MEMBERS OF THE SELECTION BOARD

MEMBERS OF THE SELECTION BOARD

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST/40/07

OPEN COMPETITION

ASSISTANTS (AST 3) IN THE FIELD OF PROOFREADING

ASSISTANTS

IN THE FIELD OF PROOFREADING

(Maltese language)

(2008/C 25 A/05)

| Chairman: | Valeria SCIARRINO |
| --- | --- |
| Alternate chairman: | Raymond PISANI |
| Full members: | Carmel AZZOPARDI |
| | Helle LITTLEJOHN |

Chairman:

Valeria SCIARRINO

Alternate chairman:

Raymond PISANI

Full members:

Carmel AZZOPARDI

Helle LITTLEJOHN

---
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v WAYNE CALLAHAN, Private, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

18 USCMA 573, 40 CMR 285

No. 22,156

September 12, 1969

*Lieutenant Donald B. Brant, Jr.,*JAGC, USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Commander Walter F. Brown,*JAGC, USN, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

This appellant’s pleas of guilty to three specifications of absence without leave, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 886, are not rendered improvident by the law officer’s failure to set forth the elements of these offenses when assessing the worth of the guilty pleas. Not only is the inquiry into the pleas equal to that found in United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247, but, in mitigation, Callahan testified and acknowledged not only his guilt but gave his reasons for going absent. However, the procedure followed in this case would not meet the standard that must apply to cases tried thirty days after the decision in United States v Care, supra.

Therefore, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Ferguson, Judge:

I concur in the result. See my dissent in United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247.
Exhibit 31.7

ARC PROPERTIES OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Glenn J. Rufrano, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of ARC Properties Operating Partnership, L.P.;
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                   
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2015 |  |  |  | /s/ Glenn J. Rufrano                                                                                                              
|                     |  |  |  | Glenn J. Rufrano                                                                                                                  
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer of American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., general partner of ARC Properties Operating Partnership, L.P.
#### Albert B. McConnell et al. *v.*United States

No. 6386.

Entry No. 727382, etc.

Invoices dated Glasgow, Scotland, August 27, 1941, etc.

Certified September 2, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 1, 1941, etc.

(Decided September 27, 1946)

*Jordan & Klingaman*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in .section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
In The Matter Of: 

SERVED: April 13, 2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

' .... ~ L ,_. ~ . : ... ~ ...... ;____ -!:\ 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0867 

BIRMINGHAM 

FLIGHT CENTER, INC. 

Respondent 

Case No. 2012S0090053 

ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR RESPONDENT TO FILE SUPPLEMENT AL 

MATERIAL AND CONTINUING THE MOTION CONFERENCE 

On March 30, 2016, an Order Setting Motion Conference was filed. This Order set for 

April 13, 2016, a Motion Conference on the Respondent's Motion for Alternate Sanctions. 

· On April 16, 20 l (), the parties convened by telephone for the Motion Conference. During 

the Motion Conference, the Court set a filing deadline and a date and time for a Continued . 

Motion Conference. This Order codifies those dates. 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.205(a)(l) and (6), and after reviewing all relevant caselaw, 

regulation, statutory authority, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The deadline for the Respondent to file its Supplemental Material shall be May 2, 2016. 

2. The parties shall reconvene for a Continued Motion Conference on May 5, 2016, at 

10:30 a.m. Eastern time. · 

3. The Office of Hearings shall provide the parties with the conference call number, no later 

than May 2, 2016. 

Attachment: Service List 
Docket No. F AA-2014-0867 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

ONE COPY 

Mr. Christopher R. Stevenson 

Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

Southern Region · 

1701 Columbia A venue 

College Park, GA 30337 

TEL: 404-305~5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

Mr. Paul R. Borth 

Respondent's Counsel 

Barnett & Borth, LLC 

800 Waukegan Road, Suite 200 

Glenview, IL 60025-4387 

TEL: 847-724-5520 

FAX:: 815-356-7042 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

' US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX:: 202-366-7536 

Birmingham Flight Center, Inc. 

Respondent 

4243 East Lake Blvd. 

Birmingham, AL 35217 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
# C_2007223EN.01001602.xml

| 22.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/16

---

Appeal brought on 3 August 2007 by Alessandro Lofaro against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 24 May 2007 in Joined Cases F-27/06 and F-75/06, Lofaro v Commission

(Case T-293/07 P)

(2007/C 223/27)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Alessandro Lofaro (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: J.-L. Laffineur, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought by the appellant

| — | declare the appeal admissible and well founded and, accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the appeal admissible and well founded and, accordingly,

| — | set aside the order of the Civil Service Tribunal in Cases F-27/06 and 75/06 delivered on 24 May 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the order of the Civil Service Tribunal in Cases F-27/06 and 75/06 delivered on 24 May 2007;

| — | rule on the merits and uphold the appellant's original application. |
| --- | --- |

—

rule on the merits and uphold the appellant's original application.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In his appeal, the appellant claims that the Civil Service Tribunal erred in law in its interpretation of Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations and, in particular, as regards the period laid down for lodging the complaint and the date to be taken into account for the expiry of that period. The appellant claims that the Tribunal's interpretation prejudices general principles of Community law, such as the principle of legal certainty, of non-discrimination and of proportionality, as well as the rights of the appellant. He further submits that the Tribunal did not respond to all the pleas put forward by him in his actions and that, accordingly, the order is vitiated by a defective statement of reasons which is inadequate and incorrect.

---
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

DEC 24 2014 

~r. ~ark Creager 

GDC Technics, Ltd. 

607 N. Frank Luke Drive 

San Antonio, Texas 78226 

Dear ~r. Creager: 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, Washington 98057-3356 

We have received your petition letter dated November 7, 2014, requesting exemption from 

§ 25.813(e) of Title 14, Code ofFederal Regulations. This request was submitted to the 

Department of Transportation's Federal Docket ~anagement System (at Regulations.gov) 

on November 20,2014, and has been assigned Docket No. FAA-2014-0981. The 

exemption, if granted, would permit relief from the requirement that no door may be 

installed between any passenger seat that is occupiable for takeoff and landing and any 

passenger emergency exit, such that the door crosses any egress path (including aisles, 

crossaisles, and passageways). You stated that the proposed exemption is specifically 

intended for a VIP interior on a Boeing 787-8 airplane designated as "not for hire, not for 

common carriage." The petition also stated that you have chosen to comply with the 

applicable provisions of Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) No. 109. 

This is to inform you that we have reviewed your petition and the proposed interior door 

installation, in conjunction with the provisions of SF AR 109. We have determined that 

according to paragraph 10 ofthe SFAR, the design proposed by GDC Technics, Ltd., would 

satisfy the requirements ofthe SFAR and therefore, an exemption from§ 25.813(e) is not 

needed. 

You may withdraw your petition in writing via Regulations.gov (Docket No. FAA-2014-

0981) within 30 days. Otherwise, if we have not heard from you within that timeframe, we 

will close the docket with no further notice to you. 

If you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please 

contact ~r. JeffGardlin at (425) 227-2136, or by e-mail at Jeff.Gardlin@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

.f'7- Suzanne ~asterson ~anager, Airframe & Cabin Safety 

Transport Standards Staff 

COPY 

OF ORiGINAL
(Reap. Dec. 8939)

Entry No. 885519.

#### Cosmos Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided July 25, 1957)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a re-appraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff. The court thereupon ordered the case submitted.

*601Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 35.14



LOGO

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

OF

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the Special Servicer), as special servicer under the
applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in
his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:



| | 1. | A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1, 2015 and ending on December 31, 2015 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto) (the
Reporting Period), and of the Special Servicers performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and
Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



LNR PARTNERS, LLC,a Florida limited liability companyBy:

/s/ Job WarshawJob WarshawPresident


Dated: February 23, 2016





1601 Washington Avenue  Suite
700  Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600  Fax: (305) 695-5601



---

Schedule I

CGCMT 2015-GC33

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.,
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC33

Citibank, N.A.,

Global Transaction Services

388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor

New York NY 10013

John Hannon

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

390 Greenwich
Street, 5th Floor

New York NY 10013

Paul Vanderslice

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

388 Greenwich
Street, 19th Floor

New York NY 10013

Richard Simpson

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

388 Greenwich
Street, 17th Floor

New York NY 10013

Ryan M. OConnor

Situs Holdings, LLC

5065 Westheimer, Suite 700E

Attn: Legal Department

Houston TX 77052

Legal Department

Situs Holdings, LLC

2 Embarcadero, Suite 1300

San Francisco CA 94111

Stacey Ciarlanti
No. 64310.

protests 219476-K, etc. (New York).

#### Charles Hall, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), the items of merchandise marked with the letter “A” were held dutiable as follows: (a) As to the items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to May 28, 1950, at 20 percent under paragraph 1547(a) ; and (b) as to items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after May 28, 1950, at 10 percent under paragraph 1547(a), as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 52476).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARK DAVID SMITH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 619 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of February, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 79 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 79

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that no United States assistance 
should be provided directly to the Palestinian Authority if any 
representative political party holding a majority of parliamentary 
seats within the Palestinian Authority maintains a position calling for 
the destruction of Israel.

            Passed the Senate February 1, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 79

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

   Expressing the sense of Congress that no United States assistance 
    should be provided directly to the Palestinian Authority if any 
  representative political party holding a majority of parliamentary 
seats within the Palestinian Authority maintains a position calling for 
                       the destruction of Israel.
```