alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification

 

I, James Darrell Thomas, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2010-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.              Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.              I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and, based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement; and

 

5.              All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.

 
|                  | HARLEY-DAVIDSON   MOTORCYCLE TRUST 2010-1 |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                  |                                      |   |
|                  |                                      | By: | Harley-Davidson   Credit Corp.,

 as   Servicer |
|                  |                                      |   |   |
|                  |                                      | By: | /s/   James Darrell Thomas |
|                  |                                      |   | James   Darrell Thomas |
|                  |                                      |   | Vice   President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary |
|                  |                                      |   | (senior   officer in charge of the servicing function) |
|                  |                                      |   |   |
|                  |                                      |   |   |
| March 25,   2013 |                                      |   |   |

 

----
<PAGE>

November 16, 1998

TJ International, Inc.
200 East Mallard
Boise, Idaho  83706



Re:  Form 10-Q Report for the Quarter Ended October 3, 1998

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K calling for
a letter from a registrant's independent accountants whenever there has been a
change in accounting principle or practice.

We have been informed that, as of January 4, 1998, the Company changed from
the LIFO method of accounting to the FIFO method of accounting for its lumber,
veneer, Microllam-Registered Trademark- LVL, TJI-Registered Trademark- Joists
and open web trusses.  According to management, the Company is executing a
strategy of increasing the sales of its new technology Parallam-Registered
Trademark- PSL, Timberstrand-Registered Trademark- LSL, and TJI-Registered
Trademark- TS-120 TimberStrand-Registered Trademark- flanged I-joist products
which are valued using the FIFO methodology.  The Company believes using the
FIFO inventory costing methodology for all its product lines is a more
appropriate and consistent matching of costs against revenues.

A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for
determining the preferability of accounting principles among acceptable
alternative principles has not been established by the accounting profession. 
Thus, we cannot make an objective determination of whether the change in
accounting described in the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method. 
However, we have reviewed the pertinent factors, including those related to
financial reporting, in this particular case on a subjective basis, and our
opinion stated below is based in our determination made in this manner.

We are of the opinion that the Company's change in method of accounting is to
an acceptable alternative method of accounting, which, based upon the reasons
stated for the change and our discussions with you, is also preferable under
the circumstances in this particular case.  In arriving at this opinion, we
have relied on the business judgment and business planning of your management.

We have not audited the application of this change to the financial statements
of any period subsequent to January 3, 1998.  Further, we have not examined
and do not express any opinion with respect to your financial statements for
the nine months ended October 3, 1998.

                                   Very truly yours,


                                   /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                   ------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




|                     |  |     |                        
|-------------------- |  | --- | -----------------------
|Date: March 31, 2022 |  | By: | /s/James M. Frates     
|                     |  |     | James M. Frates        
|                     |  |     | Chief Financial Officer



---
#### United States *v.*Cooperativa Azucarera Los Caños

No. 7557.

Entry No. C-12.

Invoice dated Calcutta, India, October 8, 1941.

Certified October 9, 1941.

Entered at Arecibo, Puerto Rico, January 5, 1942.

(Decided March 4, 1948)

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiS.

*Louis E. Bubón*for the defendant.

Laweence, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement was submitted on the following stipulation:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course' of trade for exportation to the United States, plus when not included in such price, the cost of all containers of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, is Rupees 46/3/2 per 100 bags, packed, less *%*Rupee per bale shipping charges.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that there was no higher foreign value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

> *******

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value of the involved merchandise to which this appeal relates, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 to be the proper basis for determining the value of said merchandise, and that such value is rupees 46/3/2 per 100 bags, packed, less *%*rupee per bale shipping charges.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# C_2008143EN.01000802.xml

| 10.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5090 — ČEZ/MOL/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 143/05)

On 13 May 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5090. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5090. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

GARY D. CHANEY,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

vs.

 CASE NO. C2-11-750

OFFICER PFAFF, et al., JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE TERENCE P. KEMP

Defendants.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the Order filed December 13, 2012, JUDGMENT is hereby entered

DISMISSING this case.

Date: December 13, 2012 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:11-cv-00750-EAS-TPK Doc #: 15 Filed: 12/13/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
124 STAT. 4068 PUBLIC LAW 111–369—JAN. 4, 2011 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6412: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Dec. 7, 9, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 20, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–369 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to require the Attorney General to share 

criminal records with State sentencing commissions, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Access to Criminal History 

Records for State Sentencing Commissions Act of 2010’’. 

SEC. 2. ATTORNEY GENERAL TO SHARE CRIMINAL RECORDS WITH 

STATE SENTENCING COMMISSIONS. 

Section 534(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended 

by inserting after ‘‘, the States’’ the following: ‘‘, including State 

sentencing commissions’’. 

Approved January 4, 2011. 

Access to 

Criminal History 

Records for State 

Sentencing 

Commissions Act 

of 2010. 

28 USC 1 note. 

Jan. 4, 2011 

[H.R. 6412] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINA L APP EALS OF TEX AS

N O . P D - 0 5 6 3 - 1 7

T E R R I R E G I N A L A N G , A p p e l l a n t

v . T H E S T A T E O F T E X A S O N A P P E L L A N T ’ S P E T I T I O N F O R D I S C R E T I O N A R Y R E V I E W

F R O M T H E T H I R D C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

B U R N E T C O U N T Y K E L L E R , P . J . , f

i l e d a c o n c u r r i n g o p i n i o n .
A statute must be construed in acc ordanc e with the plain meaning of its text unless the text is ambig uous or the plain mea ning w ould lead to absurd r esults that the leg islature could not have possibly intended. The org anized reta il theft statute say s:

1 A person commits an offe nse if the person intenti o n al ly conducts, promotes, or facilitates an acti vi t

y in which the person rec eives, possesses, conce als, stores,

Boyk in v. State , 818 S.W .2d 782, 785 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). 1LANG CONCURR ENCE — 2

barte rs, sells, or disposes of . . . stolen re tail mercha ndise. 2 Does the m eaning of the statute chang e if the italicized lang uag e is remove d? Although terms i n a st atute can s o m eti mes overla p, rende ring the m ain verbs in a st atute meaningle ss is an 3 absurd result that the leg islature could not have possibly intended. But that is exactly what happens 4 if this statute is applied to a mere shoplifter. I t is sug g ested that Appellant was not a mere shoplifter beca use she left the store with the items she stole. But the whole p o i n t of theft is to “depr ive the

owner of proper

ty .” One does not expect a person who steals proper ty from a store to rema in in the 5 store indef

initely , so leaving the store is not a suff iciently distinct act from the initial theft. 6 Wit h these c omments I join the Court’s opinion. Filed: Nove mber 21, 2018 Publis h

T E X . P E N A L C O D E § 31.16(b)( 1) (e mphasis added)

.

2 See Clinton v. State , 354 S.W .3d 795, 802 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). 3 See Arteaga v. State , 521 S.W .3d 329, 334 (Tex. Crim. App. 2017) (“We also presume that 4 ever y word has been used for a purpose and that eac h word, phrase , clause , and sentenc e should be g iven ef fec t if rea sonably

possible.”). T E X . P E N A L C O D E § 31.03(a)

. 5 Perhaps one could consume cer tain kinds of proper

ty inside a store, but it is absurd to think 6 t h at criminal liability under this provision could turn on whether a person who steals a ca n d y b ar from a store eats it while still ins ide the store or eats it shortly

afte r exiti ng .
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 7529 Dir ID: 2014 - NM - 207 - AD
#### Nicholas H. Babcock *v.*Joseph Emrich.

— Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Order filed, November 14, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00833-CV

____________

JETALL COMPANIES, INC., Appellant

V.

FOUR SEASONS FOOD DISTRIBUTORS, INC. AND DAVID G. DANG, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the 212th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-CV-2294

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due November 11, 2013. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The 

record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed 

timely, we issue the following order.

We order Tamra Parks, the substitute court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 10 days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM
No. 53706.

protest 147130-K (New York).

#### Herman Hollander, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact landed. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, is subject to an allowance in duties. The protest was sustained to this extent.
# Official Journal C 141/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 141 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4916 June 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 141

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4916 June 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 141/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 141/2 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 2 |
| 2006/C 141/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4238 — E.ON/Pražská plynárenská) (1) | 4 |
| 2006/C 141/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4256 — Xstrata/Falconbridge) (1) | 5 |
| 2006/C 141/5 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4204 — Cinven/UPC France) (1) | 6 |
| 2006/C 141/6 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4156 — Lactalis/Nestlé) (1) | 7 |
| 2006/C 141/7 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4218 — Investcorp/Orefi Participation) (1) | 8 |
| 2006/C 141/8 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4096 — Carrefour/Hyparlo) (1) | 8 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 141/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 141/2

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

2

2006/C 141/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4238 — E.ON/Pražská plynárenská) (1)

4

2006/C 141/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4256 — Xstrata/Falconbridge) (1)

5

2006/C 141/5

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4204 — Cinven/UPC France) (1)

6

2006/C 141/6

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4156 — Lactalis/Nestlé) (1)

7

2006/C 141/7

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4218 — Investcorp/Orefi Participation) (1)

8

2006/C 141/8

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4096 — Carrefour/Hyparlo) (1)

8

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 141/9 | Call for proposals — DG EAC No 26/06 — European associations acting at European level in the field of education (1) | 9 |

III   Notices

Commission

2006/C 141/9

Call for proposals — DG EAC No 26/06 — European associations acting at European level in the field of education (1)

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
No. 48033.

#### Petition 6124-R of Mrs. Otto Falk (Milwaukee).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The petitioner testified that she imported an iron cot with spring and mattress and some other goods and that when the invoice arrived she sent it to her customs broker to make entry. It appeared from the testimony of the customs broker that in making entry he deducted from the value of certain *400upholstery cloth the values of the cotton mattress and cushions which were, in fact, included in the value of the spring mattress, but that the total on the entry was the same as the total value of the invoice, and that his action was due to the joint understanding between himself, and the appraiser. The collector assessed 14 percent additional duties. It was found that the petitioner in making entry acted without intention to misrepresent the facts, or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise, dr to defraud the revenue of the United States. The petition was therefore granted.
Exhibit No. 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Pacific Land Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), David M. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer of the Trust, certifies, to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.







TEXAS PACIFIC LAND TRUST(Registrant)Date:  August 6, 2009
By:
/s/ David M. PetersonDavid M. Peterson, Assistant General Agent
and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit (31)-2**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Richard D. Rodekohr, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Transcontinental Gas Pipe LineCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 15, 2005     By: /s/ Richard D. Rodekohr         Richard D. Rodekohr    Vice President and Treasurer    (Principal Financial Officer)
No. 40324.

#### Protests 834641-G(A), etc., of Park Benziger Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the records presented the protests were overruled.
TS- EMLA50 /60/70/80

Attachment #5

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 2

Worker/ Occupational Exposure Information on the New Chemical Substance at

Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter

– Manufacture and Processing