alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TODHUNTER
INTERNATIONAL, INC'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       6,809,978
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,886,728
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 24,989,841
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            52,824,482
<PP&E>                                      74,996,025
<DEPRECIATION>                              34,306,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              98,810,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,363,501
<BONDS>                                     36,019,565
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,497
<OTHER-SE>                                  42,512,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                98,810,460
<SALES>                                     35,572,005
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,572,005
<CGS>                                       24,109,311
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,109,311
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,689,023
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,859,024
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,914,647
<INCOME-TAX>                                   698,520
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,216,127
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,216,127
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45
        

</TABLE>
# CA2008093EN.01003001.xml

| 15.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 93/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 93/30

---

RESERVE LISTS (1)

OPEN COMPETITIONS

(2008/C 93 A/05)

EPSO/AD92/07 — CONFERENCE INTERPRETERS (AD5)

HAVING SLOVENIAN (SL) AS MAIN LANGUAGE

Option 1

| HRIBAR | Tadeja |
| --- | --- |
| KUŽNIK | Nina |

HRIBAR

Tadeja

KUŽNIK

Nina

Option 2

NO SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE

Option 3

| NAVARRO JEVTOVIC | Vladimir |
| --- | --- |

NAVARRO JEVTOVIC

Vladimir

EPSO/AD93/07 — CONFERENCE INTERPRETERS (AD7)

HAVING SLOVENIAN (SL) AS MAIN LANGUAGE

Option 1

NO SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE

Option 2

NO SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE

Option 3

| GINEFRA | Piergiorgio |
| --- | --- |

GINEFRA

Piergiorgio

The reserve lists will be valid until 31 December 2009 and may be extended.

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

---
Exhibit 34.2




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP)









Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm






The Board of Directors


U.S. Bank National Association






We have examined management’sassertion, including the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities platform (the Platform), as of March 31, 2013, and for the period fromApril 1, 2012 through March 31, 2013, except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)–(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(v)–(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i), and 1122(d)(4)(i)–(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report.  Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.






Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.






In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of March 31, 2013, and for the periodfrom April 1, 2012 through March 31, 2013, for the Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.






/s/ Ernst & Young LLP




May 28, 2013
EXHIBIT 32.2


		  CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
		      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
			     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Thomas
Brandt, Executive Vice President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Trans-Lux
Corporation, do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

    (1) The Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

    This Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not
be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Registrant or
the certifying officer.



				       /s/ Thomas Brandt
				       -----------------------------
Date:  May 20, 2008		       Thomas Brandt
				       Executive Vice President and
				       Co-Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.2**I, Joseph F. Spanier, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Breeze-Eastern Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 7, 2007 /s/  Joseph F. Spanier   Joseph F. Spanier   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 4.14
English Summary
​
Framework agreement on the
performance of confirmatory
diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2
​
This Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Service Agreement”) is entered into between:
​
21Dx GmbH, with the address at Kreillerstraße 210, 81825 München, Germany (“Customer”)
​
and
​
Centogene GmbH (“CENTOGENE”), a company incorporated in accordance with the laws of the Federal Republic of Germany with a registered address at Am Strande 7, 18055 Rostock, Germany.
​
		1.	Subject Matter of the Contract

​
Customer is the main contractor of the Berlin Senate due to a tender won to establish and operate state-run test centers in Berlin to carry out so-called antigen "citizen tests". The parties undertake to establish a cooperation in carrying out publicly billed PCR tests in those state-run test centers for eligible persons according to the Regulation on the entitlement to be tested with regard to a direct determination of the pathogen of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (Coronavirus-Test-Verordnung - TestV).
​
		2.	Scope of Services

​
Amongst other obligations, CENTOGENE together with its laboratory partner are responsible for the provision of laboratory analysis to conduct PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 whereas Customer shall be responsible for taking throat swabs, logistics and the operation of CENTOGENE’s web portal to link and register samples.
​
		3.	Obligations of CENTOGENE

​
Obligations include, among other things,
​
		i.	performance of laboratory analysis tests	

		ii.	delivery of swabs and labels to link samples within the web portal

		iii.	notification of results to test persons and to public health offices in case of positive tests

		iv.	support of Customer with documentation requirements in case of billing checks by public 

​
		4.	Remuneration

​
The test kits as well as the access to the web portal are provided to Customer free of charge. As for the laboratory analysis and the throat swabs both parties shall invoice their services and costs separately from each other with the public cost unit according to the Regulation on the entitlement to be tested with regard to a direct determination of the pathogen of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (Coronavirus-Test-Verordnung - TestV).
​
		5.	Term and Termination

​
The term of the Service Agreement commenced on June 26, 2021 and expires on March 31, 2022
Exhibit 34.14



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



| |  |                                                                                                                               
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Audit  Tax  Advisory
Grant Thornton LLP 1201 Walnut St, Suite 2200
Kansas City, Missouri 64106 T 816.412.2400
F 816.412.2404

Board of Directors

Situs
Holdings, LLC

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing
Criteria (Managements Assertion), that Situs Holdings, LLC (the Company) complied with servicing criteria set forth in Items 1117, 1119, 1122(d)(3)(i), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(vii) of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commissions Regulation AB included in Appendix A as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, with respect to the Companys Operating or Trust Advisor Services performed over the deals listed in Appendix B (the
Platform). Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion about the Companys compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Services and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination was not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Companys activities with respect to
the Platform during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that Situs Holdings, LLC complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2015, for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.







LOGO

Kansas City, Missouri

February 18, 2016
Exhibit (31)-1**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Phillip D. Wright, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Transcontinental Gas Pipe LineCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 4, 2005     By: /s/ Phillip D. Wright         Phillip D. Wright
Case: 2:12-cv-00684-EAS-NMK Doc #: 21 Filed: 03/01/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T21:24:06-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
April 17, 1944

No. 49345.

Suit 4453.

#### L. *Oppleman, Inc.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 775 affirmed March 6, 1944. C. A. D. 270.
GARY LEONARD CLAIR

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF F ILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 1467

Opinion filed May 17, 2017.

Petition for Belated Appeal

-- Original Jurisdiction.

Gary Leonard Clair, pro se

, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The pet ition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

WOLF, RAY, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9288 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9288

 To direct the Secretary of Defense to procure cleaning products that 
  are identified by the Safer Choice program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 2024

 Ms. Slotkin (for herself and Ms. Mace) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Defense to procure cleaning products that 
  are identified by the Safer Choice program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prioritizing PFAS-Free Cleaning 
Products Act''.

SEC. 2. PROCUREMENT OF CLEANING PRODUCTS.

    The Secretary of Defense shall, to the maximum extent practicable, 
only procure cleaning products that are identified by--
            (1) the Safer Choice program; or
            (2) an independent third-party organization that provides 
        certifications in a manner consistent with the Safer Choice 
        program.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2007283EN.01000602.xml

| 24.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/6

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court (Ireland) made on 6 August 2007 — Nicole Hassett and Cheryl Doherty/The Medical Defence Union Limited and MDU Services Limited v Raymond Howard and Brian Davidson

(Case C-372/07)

(2007/C 283/10)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Supreme Court, Ireland

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Nicole Hassett and Cheryl Doherty/The Medical Defence Union Limited and MDU Services Limited

Applicants:

Defendants: Raymond Howard and Brian Davidson

Defendants:

Questions referred

Where medical practitioners form a mutual defence organisation taking the form of a company, incorporated under the laws of one Member State, for the purpose of providing assistance and indemnity to its members practising in that and another Member State in respect of their professional practice, and the provision of such assistance or indemnity is dependant on the making of a decision by the Board of Management of that company, in accordance with its Articles of association, in its absolute discretion, are proceedings in which a decision refusing assistance or indemnity to a medical practitioner practising in the other Member State pursuant to that provision is challenged by that medical practitioner as involving a breach by the company of contractual or other legal rights of the medical practitioner concerned to be considered to be proceedings which have as their object the validity of a decision of an organ of that company for the purposes of Article 22, paragraph 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (1) so that the courts of the Member State in which that company has its seat have exclusive jurisdiction?

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2201 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ L 12, p. 1).

1

---