alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021009EN.01001301.xml

| 11.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/13

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2020 — Lietuvos geležinkeliai v Commission

(Case T-814/17) (1)

(Competition - Abuse of a dominant position - Rail freight market - Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU - Access by third-party undertakings to infrastructure managed by Lithuania’s national railway company - Removal of a section of railway track - Concept of ‘abuse’ - Actual or likely exclusion of a competitor - Calculation of the amount of the fine - 2006 Guidelines on the method for setting fines - Remedies - Proportionality - Unlimited jurisdiction)

(2021/C 9/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by: W. Deselaers, K. Apel and P. Kirst, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Cleenewerck de Crayencour, A. Dawes, H. Leupold and G. Meessen, acting as Agents)

Intervener, in support of the defendant: Orlen Lietuva AB (Mažeikiai, Lithuania) (represented by: C. Thomas and C. Conte, lawyers)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking, primarily, the annulment of Commission Decision C(2017) 6544 final of 2 October 2017 relating to proceedings under Article 102 TFEU (Case AT.39813 — Baltic Rail) and, in the alternative, the reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB by Article 2 of European Commission Decision C(2017) 6544 final of 2 October 2017 relating to proceedings under Article 102 TFEU (Case AT.39813 — Baltic Rail) at EUR 20 068 650; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB by Article 2 of European Commission Decision C(2017) 6544 final of 2 October 2017 relating to proceedings under Article 102 TFEU (Case AT.39813 — Baltic Rail) at EUR 20 068 650;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Lietuvos geležinkeliai and the Commission to bear their own costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Lietuvos geležinkeliai and the Commission to bear their own costs;

| 4. | Orders Orlen Lietuva AB to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Orlen Lietuva AB to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 12.2.2018.

---
# C_2008261EN.01000502.xml

| 14.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5048 — Ingersoll Rand/Trane)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 261/03)

On 10 April 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5048. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5048. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Exhibit 12.1

Statement Regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges    Radiation Therapy Services Holdings, Inc.

PredecessorSuccessorYear Ended December 31,Period From
January 1 to
February 21,
2008

Period From
February 22 to
December 31,
2008Year Ended
December 31,
2009

Year Ended
December 31,
20102006

2007Pre-tax income before before adjustment for noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries


49,886


42,644


(10,283
)

(4,266
)

(6,713
)

(126,600
)(Income) Loss from equity investees


128


46


(39
)

118


(880
)

(1,001
)Distributed income of equity investees














301


(1,007
)Noncontrolling interest in pre-tax income of subsidiaries that have not incurred fixed charges


(580
)

(1,211
)

(19
)

(2,483
)

(1,835
)

(1,698
)Fixed Charges


13,376


21,298


4,981


57,070


65,138


62,489Earnings


62,810


62,777


(5,361
)

50,439


56,010


(67,817
)Interest expense


12,570


20,250


4,783


55,863


63,119


59,098An estimate of the interest within rental expense


806


1,048


198


1,207


2,018


3,392Fixed Charges


13,376


21,298


4,981


57,070


65,138


62,489Ratio of earnings to fixed charges


4.70


2.95











Deficiency to cover charges(2)








10,341


6,631


9,128


130,306


(1)For
purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consist of income (loss) before provision for income taxes plus fixed charges.
Fixed charges consist of interest expense on all indebtness including amortization of deferred financing costs and the portion of operating lease rental expense that is representative of the interest
factor.(2)Coverage
deficiency represents the amount by which earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges.


---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of SodaStream International Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Erdreich,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





April 30, 2012



|By: | /s/ Daniel Erdreich            | 
|--- | ------------------------------ | 
|    | Name: Daniel Erdreich          | 
|    | Title: Chief Financial Officer |
(logo)PrincipalTM 

 

**Statement ofCompliance**

 

ToWells Fargo Bank National Association, Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator,and Paying Agent of the Series of Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, referred to on Attachment A:

 

I,Steven Johnson, in my capacity as Managing Director of Principal GlobalInvestors, LLC and Principal Real Estate Investors, LLC, as Primary Servicersfor mortgage loans securing securities issued in conjunction with the series ofCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, referred to on Attachment A,hereby state that:

 

1.       I aman officer of Principal Global Investors, LLC and Principal Real EstateInvestors, LLC;

 

2.       Areview of the activities of Principal Global Investors, LLC and Principal RealEstate Investors, LLC in their capacity as Primary Servicers during thecalendar year ending December 31, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”); and of theirperformance under the applicable sub-servicing agreement has been made under mysupervision; and

 

3.       To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, Principal Global Investors, LLC and PrincipalReal Estate Investors, LLC, as Primary Servicers have fulfilled all of theirobligations in all material respects under the Primary Servicing Agreements forsaid Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, referred to on Attachment Athroughout the above-referenced Reporting Period.

 

 

Date:February 21, 2024

 

 /s/Steven R. Johnson 

StevenR. Johnson 

ManagingDirector

PrincipalReal Estate Investors, LLC 

PrincipalGlobal Investors, LLC

 

 

**Attachment A**

Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates

 

| **Wells Fargo Bank,  National Association, as Master Servicer** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Series  2005 PWR10 dated December 1, 2005                       | Series  2007 Top25 dated January 30, 2007 | Series  2006-Top24 dated October 1, 2006 |
| Series  2007 Top26 dated April 18, 2007                         | Series  2013 C17 dated November 1, 2013 | Series  2007 PWR15 dated March 29, 2007 |
| Series  2013 C13 dated May 1, 2013                              | Series  2015 – C27 dated March 1, 2015 | Series  2014 – C19 dated March 1, 2014 |
| Series  2014 – LC14 dated February 1, 2014                | Series  2017 – P7 dated April 1, 2017 | Series  2015 – P1 dated August 1, 2015 |
| Series  2014 – C21 dated August 1, 2014                   | Series  2016 – P3 dated April 1, 2016 | Series  2017 – P8 dated September 1, 2017 |
| Series  2015 – P2 dated December 1, 2015                  | Series  2016 – P4 dated July 1, 2016 | Series  2017 – CD6 dated November 1, 2017 |

 

| **Midland Loan  Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Series  2016 – P5 dated October 1, 2016                                                | Series  2016 – P6 dated December 1, 2016 | Series  2019 – CD8 dated August 1, 2019 |
| CSAIL  2021 C20 dated March 1, 2021                                                          |   |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<CIK>  0000098559
<NAME>  TOKHEIM CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                            5868
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    72385
<ALLOWANCES>                                      3008
<INVENTORY>                                      64735<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                145946
<PP&E>                                           95465<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                   56955
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  261455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            98359
<BONDS>                                         100000
<COMMON>                                         20679<F4>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             9433<F3>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (14189)<F5>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    261455
<SALES>                                         279662
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                279662
<CGS>                                           209438<F6>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   209438<F6>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               12443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1786
<INCOME-TAX>                                       299
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1487
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1487
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
<FN>
<F1> Represents gross inventory net of loss reserves.
<F2> Represents gross PP&E.
<F3> Represents redeemable preferred stock of $24,000 less Guaranteed ESOP
     of $10,012 and treasury stock of $4,555.
<F4> Represents common stock of $20,871 less treasury stock of $192.
<F5> Represents retained earnings of $9,591 less minimum pension liability
     of $3,248 and foreign currency translation adjustments of $20,532.
<F6> Includes product development expenses and excludes depreciation and
     amortization.
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906

Certification of Chief
Executive Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the Report) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the Registrant), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael S. Gross, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/S/    MICHAEL S.
GROSSName:

Michael S. GrossDate:

February 25, 2015
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
UNDER
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a) I, Dominic J. Pileggi, certify that: (1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Thomas & Betts
Corporation; (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; (4) The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; (b) [Reserved] (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and (5) The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Dated this 6th day of August 2004. /s/ DOMINIC J. PILEGGIDominic J. PileggiChief Executive Officer
# C_2007262EN.01000902.xml

| 1.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4756 — AGCO/ARGO/Laverda)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 262/08)

On 13 September 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4756. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4756. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Michael
R. Mulcahy, President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Trans-Lux Corporation,
do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

    (1) The Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

    This Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not
be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Registrant or
the certifying officer.



                                       /s/ Michael R. Mulcahy
                                       ----------------------------------------
Date:  November 14, 2007               Michael R. Mulcahy
                                       President and Co-Chief Executive Officer
Regulatory Evaluation 

--:J-o 1 ~ -c c-::- a)_ "-t-1 + o Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: - ...-Af)~ 

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you mu\t ensure the totals update accordingzv. If 

the} do not, click (or Tab) into and then out oftht changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action 

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance) (e.g., Inspection, Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) 

Do no (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet t include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Inspection - 1.0 106 Lockin_g_ Force · 

Inspection - Bell 

1.0 106 Crank 

' 

• 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $18,020 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing, and close- replacement) 

up) 

Replacement 5.0 $566 

Install Inspection 15.0 $1,004 Openings 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) : The two Parts 

Cost estimates include the shipping estimate to the United States. 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? @ 

YES* 0 N0[8] 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? G 

YES* 0 N0(8] 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. G 

YES 0 N0[8] 

Explanation: This AD only affects 106 US registered gliders. 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? G) 

YES* D N0[8] 

*Explanation:
Exhibit 34.2



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Managers of C-III Capital Partners LLC, the

Sole Member of C-III Asset Management LLC:

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Managements Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB
Servicing Criteria, that C-III Asset Management LLC (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for
all transactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving first lien commercial mortgage loans (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(i)
 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix) and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the
Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the assertion based on our examination.

Our
examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting managements assertion and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2016 is fairly stated, in all material aspects.



LOGO

Asheville, North Carolina

February 6, 2017
# C_2008278EN.01S00301.xml

| 31.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---