alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-20295

Summary Calendar

 

LAWRENCE STEPHEN MAXWELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; THE

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OF THE

COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; INTERNAL

REVENUE SERVICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH

OF PUERTO RICO,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-96-MC-685

- - - - - - - - - -

October 14, 1997

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lawrence Stephen Maxwell appeals from the district court’s

dismissal of his petition to quash three administrative summonses

directed to other parties and issued by the Internal Revenue

Service (IRS) for lack of jurisdiction. Maxwell argues that the

summonses had been issued in connection with an investigation

into his tax liability, that the summonses had been issued
No. 97-20295

-2-

outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, that

neither Maxwell nor the summoned third parties were subject to

the administrative authority of the United States Federal

Corporation, that IRS Special Agent Duncan did not have the

authority to issue the summonses, and that the administrative

summons (Form 2039) had not been published in the Federal

Register. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Because Maxwell has not shown that he had any proprietary

interest in the subjects of the summonses, he lacked standing to

petition to quash the summonses. See United States v. Bass, 784

F.2d 1282, 1286-87 & n.7 (5th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, the

judgement of the district court dismissing Maxwell’s petition for

lack of jurisdiction is AFFIRMED.
| 1.     | I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 to the  annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 of Sanomedics International Holdings, Inc.                                                                                                                                         |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
| 2.     | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

| April 25, 2014 | By:    | /s/ David C. Langle                                       |   |
|----------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|           |   | David C. LanglePrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer |   |
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 262 

Condemning the statements of former Education Secretary William J. 

Bennett. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mr. REID, Mr. CORZINE, Ms. MIKULSKI, Ms. 

LANDRIEU, and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the statements of former Education Secretary 

William J. Bennett. 

Whereas William J. Bennett served as chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities from 1981 to 

1985; 

Whereas William J. Bennett served as Secretary of Education from 1985 to 1988; 

Whereas William J. Bennett served as Director of the Office 

of National Drug Control Policy from 1989 to 1990; and 

Whereas on September 28, 2005, William J. Bennett stated 

the following on Salem Radio Network’s Bill Bennett’s 

Morning in America: ‘‘[I] do know that it’s true that if 

you wanted to reduce crime, you could—if that were your 

sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this 
2 

SRES 262 IS

country, and your crime rate would go down. That would 

be an impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible 

thing to do, but your crime rate would go down.’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. That the Senate strongly condemns Wil3 liam J. Bennett’s reprehensible statements of September 

4 28, 2005. 

5 SEC. 2. That the Senate believes that such state6 ments are unbecoming of a former Cabinet Secretary. 

Æ
Exhibit 4.28


 


DESCRIPTION OF THE
REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES 


REGISTERED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 12 OF THE SECURITIES 


EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


 


As
of March 15, 2022, iSign Solutions Inc. (the “Company”) had one class of common stock registered under Section 12 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).


 


Description of Common Stock


 


The
following description of the Company’s common stock is a summary and does not purport to be complete. It is subject to and qualified
in its entirety by reference to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”)
and the Company’s Amended Bylaws (the “Bylaws”) incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-K of which
this Exhibit is attached. The Company encourages you to read its Certificate of Incorporation, its Bylaws and the applicable provisions
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”) for additional information.


 


Authorized Capital Shares


 


At
March 15, 2022, the Company had 2,000,000,000 authorized shares of Common Stock with a par value of $.01, of which 6,332,736 were issued
and outstanding. In addition the Company has 45,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock


 


Voting Rights


 


The
holders of Common Stock shall have the rights to vote for the election of directors and on all other matters requiring stockholder action,
each share being entitled to one vote.


 


Dividend Rights


 


The
holders of Common Stock shall have all of the rights to dividends that may or may not be declared and paid or set apart for payment out
of any assets or funds of the Corporation legally available for the payment of dividends. Since its inception, the Company has not paid
dividends and does not currently anticipate paying dividends on its Common Stock in the foreseeable future.


 


Liquidation Rights


 


The
holders of Common Stock shall have the right upon the voluntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, to participate
in the distribution of the net assets of the Corporation on a pro rata basis.





 


Other Rights and Preferences


 


The Company’s Common Stock has no sinking
fund or redemption provisions or preemptive, conversion, or exchange rights.


 


Listing


 


The Common Stock is traded on the OTC Markets
Group Inc.’s OTC Pink quotation system under the trading symbol “ISGN”


 


Transfer Agent and Registrar


 


The transfer agent and registrar for our common
stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC. The transfer agent and registrar’s address is 6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn,
NY 11219. Our shares of common stock are issued in uncertificated form only.
1

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 EASTERN DIVISION 

TED A. POPLAWSKI, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. Civil Action 2: 12-cv-1096 

 Judge Graham 

 Magistrate Judge King 

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE 

SERVICE, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 ORDER

 Upon defendants’ motion, Doc. No. 16, the referral of the case to 

the June 2013 Settlement Week is VACATED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to 

advise the assigned mediator. 

 Defendants’ motion improperly included an attachment that 

reflects the parties’ settlement positions. The Clerk is DIRECTED to 

place the attachment to Doc. No. 16 under seal. 

 s/Norah McCann King 

 Norah McCann King 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

June 4, 2013 

Date 

Case: 2:12-cv-01096-JLG-NMK Doc #: 17 Filed: 06/04/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 653/2006

of 27 April 2006         

fixing the maximum export refund on barley in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 21 to 27 April 2006, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005, the maximum refund on exportation of barley shall be 5,90 EUR/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 April 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 April 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 12.

(3)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9106 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.9106

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
To direct the Director of the United States Secret Service to apply the 
same standards for determining the number of agents required to protect 
      Presidents, Vice Presidents, and major Presidential and Vice 
            Presidential candidates, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Enhanced Presidential Security Act 
of 2024''.
SEC. 2. UNIFORM STANDARDS FOR SECRET SERVICE PROTECTION OF PRESIDENTS, 
VICE PRESIDENTS, AND MAJOR PRESIDENTIAL AND VICE PRESIDENTIAL 
CANDIDATES.
    The Director of the United States Secret Service shall apply the 
same standards for determining the number of agents required to protect 
Presidents, Vice Presidents, and major Presidential and Vice 
Presidential candidates.
SEC. 3. REPORT.
    Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Director of the United States Secret Service shall conduct a 
comprehensive review of the provision of protection by the Secret 
Service for Presidents, Vice Presidents, former Presidents, and major 
Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates, and submit to the 
Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate a report that includes the 
findings from such review, along with any recommendations for improving 
the provision of protection.
SEC. 4. DEFINITION.
    In this Act, the term ``major Presidential and Vice Presidential 
candidates'' has the meaning given such term in section 3056 of title 
18, United States Code, and includes any other Presidential or Vice 
Presidential candidate for whom the President has otherwise authorized 
the Secret Service to protect.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# C_2008209EN.01000101.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/1

---

(2008/C 209/01)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 197, 2.8.2008

OJ C 197, 2.8.2008

Past publications

OJ C 183, 19.7.2008

OJ C 171, 5.7.2008

OJ C 158, 21.6.2008

OJ C 142, 7.6.2008

OJ C 128, 24.5.2008

OJ C 116, 9.5.2008

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY 

ASSIGNMENT OF JUDGES OF

PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL COURT TO 

THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF 

THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF 

PENNSYLVANIA 

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 336 Common Pleas Judicial 

Classification Docket 

 O R D E R

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 4

th day of March, 2016, the Petitions of Sheila WoodsSkipper, President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of the First Judicial District of 

Pennsylvania, for the extension of temporary assignment of Judges of Philadelphia 

Municipal Court to the Court of Common Pleas of the First Judicial District of 

Pennsylvania are hereby granted, as follows:

Hon. Frank T. Brady

Hon. Martin S. Coleman

Hon. James M. DeLeon

Hon. Teresa Carr Deni

Hon. Patrick F. Dugan

Hon. Joyce O. Eubanks

Hon. Jacquelyn Frazier-Lyde

Hon. Thomas F. Gehret

Hon. Barbara S. Gilbert

Hon. Charles Hayden

Hon. Nazario Jimenez, Jr.

Hon. Lydia Y. Kirkland

Hon. Gerard A. Kosinski

Hon. Henry Lewandowski III

Hon. William A. Meehan, Jr.

Hon. Bradley K. Moss

Hon. Marsha H. Neifield

Hon. Wendy L. Pew

Hon. Harvey W. Robbins
-2-

Hon. T. Francis Shields

Hon. David C. Shuter

Hon. Karen Y. Simmons

Hon. Craig M. Washington

Hon. Marvin L. Williams
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION





The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the annual report of Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.  Germán Lemonnier, the Chief Financial Officer of Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc.





Date: April 26, 2013














/s/ Germán LemonnierName: Germán LemonnierChief Financial Officer
----

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 of 12 December 2002 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid for employment

(2006/C 254/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)  With the exception of the shipbuilding sector and of other sectors subject to special rules in regulations and directives governing all state aid within the sector.

(2)  With the exception of the shipbuilding sector and of other sectors subject to special rules in regulations and directives governing all state aid within the sector.

----
cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge 

Washoe County Alternate Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

Jason Michael Flores 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) I94Th ce°
1 of 2

02 MAY 2013

Mr. Pat Mullen FAA - Small Airplane Directorate

901 Locust St

Room 301 Kansas City, MO 64106

USA

Dear Mr. Mullen:

SUBJECT: FAR 23.1549(b) - Exemption No. 10465 – AP PLICATION FOR EXTENSION

REFERENCE: FAA Docket Number: FAA-2011-1345

Viking Air Limited (VAL) is currently working with Honeywell International Inc. (HI) to address compliance with 23.1549(b) to satisfy the “Conditio ns and Limitations” stated in the subject exemption.

We have completed flight testing on a developmental load of software that permits VAL to display the “green arcs” (see photo 1) for DHC-6 Series 400 del iveries registered in the US. This option is being developed during HI’s current revision to their Ape x platform.

As shown above, HI is introducing changes, like the ir “Smart View” Synthetic Vision display to their system that will be available on all aircraft model s that incorporate Apex. Photo 1 – Developmental Flight Testing2 of 2

In addition to the optional Apex configurations, HI is completing the Apex functions that were not available during the initial certification of the D HC-6 Series 400. Two noteworthy items include the Autopilot and TCAS II systems. These systems will r educe the pilot’s workload and enhance

situational awareness.

To this date, VAL has exported four aircraft to the US, and plan on delivering two more aircraft this year, and one in 2014. Of these seven aircraft, six require the Autopilot and TCAS II systems. It is expected to take three weeks per aircraft to incorp orate the modifications once they are approved.

All seven aircraft are expected to be delivered bef ore VAL has certification in July 2014 for the HI “Phase 2” configuration. Table A below shows the ai rcraft delivery schedule and the aircraft awaiting the upgrades.

Honeywell Phase 2

S/N Customer Planned Delivery Autopilot TCAS II 852 US Army Delivered Required Required 862 US Army Delivered Required Required 863 US Army Delivered Required Required 869 DFAIR AUG 2013 Required Required 870 TUDOR Delivered Required Required

876 LOCH ARD JUN 2013 Not Ordered Not Ordered 900 TWIN EXPRESS JUN 2014 Required Required

Due to the small number of aircraft affected by Exe mption No. 10465, and the fact that three of the seven aircraft are operated by one entity, VAL is r equesting a 12 month extension to the exemption.

This would ensure that aircraft delivered after Jul y 31, 2014 will be fully compliant with 23.1549(b),

and all aircraft will be retrofitted within three m onths from that date (October 31, 2014).

This additional time will enable our customers to s chedule the incorporation of the exemption’s terminating action along with their “Phase 2” upgra des into a single maintenance event and keep their

downtime to a minimum.

Please contact the undersigned should the FAA requi re additional information or additional supporting

data for this extension.

Yours truly,

Adam Dennis, P.Eng. Manager, Certification Engineering

cc.

Paul Arnell, TCCA - Pacific Region Jim Rutherfor d, FAA - Small Airplane Directorate Table A – US Aircraft Deliveries
Exhibit 4.3



 


 


 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated April 1, 2022, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 561 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement
on Form S-6 (File No. 333-262209) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement
and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


April 1, 2022
No. 46874.

#### Protest 889368-G of H. W. Peabody & Co. (San Francisco).

*452Opinion by

Tilson. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and based upon an average yarn count of 12, and other statutory requirements, merchandise described on the invoice as “15 pieces white” was held dutiable at the appropriate rate under said paragraph 904 (b), plus 5 percent under paragraph 905; and merchandise described as “10 pieces natural” was held dutiable at the appropriate rate under paragraph 904 (a), plus 5 percent under paragraph 905, as claimed.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Sediment budgets and routing inforested drainage basins**
 
Part A | PartB | Part C | Part D
 
SuDoc:A 13.88:PNW-141
Item Number:0083-B-06 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000920782
 
November 29, 2017
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7220

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DIRK LADSON,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:93-cr-00162-RAJ-10)

Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 20, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dirk Ladson, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Dirk Ladson appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Ladson

,

No. 2:93-cr-00162-RAJ-10 (E.D. Va. filed June 11, 2008; entered

June 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED