alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table 1 - SCR annual cost per NREL and ES

NREL implicit costs of SCR

Discount FCR % share Low fixed cost High fixed cost Low annual cost

SRP 9.8% 11.59% 21.7% $100.901 $118.457 $11.69

LADWP 6.0% 8.72% 21.2% $98.576 $115.727 $8.59

APS 8.3% 10.41% 14.0% $65.097 $76.424 $6.78

NVE 8.3% 10.41% 11.3% $52.543 $61.685 $5.47

TEP 8.0% 10.19% 7.5% $34.874 $40.941 $3.55

BOR 5.0% 8.02% 24.3% $112.990 $132.650 $9.07

Total 100.0% $464.980 $545.883 $45.15

NREL: pp. 19, 59 p. 14 p. 47 p. 47 pp. 19, 61

O&M costs (p. 47) $11.95 $11.95

Total cost (p. 111) $57.10

ES implicit costs of SCR (pp. 21-22)

Annual

Discount FCR % share Inflation rate 2012 cap. cost 2018 cap. cost

SRP 7.0% 7.0% 21.7% 3.0% $107.720 $124.78

LADWP 7.0% 7.0% 21.2% 3.0% $105.238 $121.91

APS 7.0% 14.9% 14.0% 3.0% $69.497 $80.50

NVE 7.0% 14.9% 11.3% 3.0% $56.094 $64.98

TEP 7.0% 14.9% 7.5% 3.0% $37.230 $43.13

BOR 7.0% 6.5% 24.3% 3.0% $120.627 $139.73

Total 100.0% $496.406 $575.026

2012 capital costs op. exp. Retrofit cap. cost to retrofit

date

Unit 1 $137.527 $3.982 2017 $159.431

Unit 2 $188.585 $3.982 2016 $212.254

Unit 3 $170.294 $3.982 2018 $203.340
High annual cost

$13.72

$10.09

$7.96

$6.42

$4.17

$10.64

$53.01

pp. 19, 61

$16.71

$69.72

2018 annual

capital cost 2018 oper. exp. 2018 total annual cost 2012 total annual cost

$8.735 $3.10 $11.830 $10.133

$8.533 $3.02 $11.557 $9.899

$11.995 $2.00 $13.992 $12.027

$9.682 $1.61 $11.294 $9.708

$6.426 $1.07 $7.496 $6.443

$9.083 $3.47 $12.549 $10.744

$54.453 $14.264 $68.717 $58.954
% Worker exposure 2 weeks, 5 days/week exposure, 30 days no exposure % From Occup_Soil Inc for PBPK.xlsx, Applicator Rochelle rate, Corn % January 19, 2016 % Cecilia Tan

% Setting model parameters use human_parameters_MRP QPC = 31; % to get QALV = 8.3 L/min @BW = 69 kg use preg_female_parameters BWSW=1; %Set BW to a fixed value BWST=69; %Set BW = 69 kg PREG=0; % Not pregnant DZONE = 1; %Turn dermal exposure on KDIS = 0.0; %daily dissipation TSTOP=1392; %Simulation time in hours

% Dermal exposure SAF=1; % Fraction of skin in contact with chlorpyrifos. FAD=1; % Fraction of dose available to be absorbed. Values of <1 could be used if pesticide is encapsulated. DERM =7.39; % dose in ug/kg D3=5; %DAYS/WEEK P2=8; %HRS/DAY S2=0 ;%OFFSET FROM 0 START TIME (EG IF YOU WANT TO MODEL FROM MIDNIGHT, BUT DOSE AT 8 AM) %W2=28; %28 day exposure W2=14; %14 day exposure

% Inhalation exposure CONCMGM=0.00108; % Inhalation concentration mg/m3. Value is largest value reported in monitoring data. D3IN=5; %DAYS/WEEK P2IN=8; %HRS/DAY S2IN=0 ;%OFFSET FROM 0 START TIME (EG IF YOU WANT TO MODEL FROM MIDNIGHT, BUT DOSE AT 8 AM) %W2IN=28; %28 day exposure W2IN=14; %14 day exposure

prepare @clear@all start @NoCallback simall = [_time _rbcce _urinetcpy _cv*350.6]; %conc unit = ug/L

%save simall @file='applicator_spray_corn_rochelle_01192016' @format=ascii save simall @file='applicator_spray_corn_rochelle_01212016' @format=ascii
**
**Exhibit 10.43**

**Summary of Amendment to Severance for Gary S. Gillheeney, Sr.**

Pursuant to the terms of that certain Amended and Restated Key Employee Agreement dated February 1, 2007 by and between Organogenesis Inc. (the“Company”) and Gary S. Gillheeney, Sr., as amended (the “Agreement”), in connection with a termination of Mr. Gillheeney’s employment by the Company other than for Cause (as defined therein) orMr. Gillheeney’s termination of his employment for Good Reason (as defined therein), the Company is obligated to provide Mr. Gillheeney with: (i) one half of his then current annual base salary, less applicable taxes, payable insix (6) equal monthly installments, (ii) continuation of medical, dental and life insurance for six months following the date of termination and (iii) executive outplacement services with a mutually agreeable outplacement provider forup to one (1) year. In August 2018, the Company’s board of directors approved a change to the terms of Mr. Gillheeney’s severance benefits upon the Company’s termination of his employment other than for Cause (as defined inthe Agreement) or Mr. Gillheeney’s termination of his employment for Good Reason (as defined in the Agreement) such that Mr. Gillheeney is entitled to: (i) his then current annual base salary, less applicable taxes, payable intwelve (12) equal monthly installments, (ii) continuation of medical, dental and life insurance for one year following the date of termination and (iii) executive outplacement services with a mutually agreeable outplacement providerfor up to one (1) year. 
**
Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 31 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 1 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 31 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 2 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 31 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 3 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 31 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 4 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 31 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 5 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 31 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 6 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 31 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 7 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 31 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 8 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 31 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 9 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 31 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 10 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 31 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 11 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 31 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 12 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 31 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 13 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 31 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 14 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 31 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 15 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 31 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 16 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 31 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 17 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2016-07-21T12:38:48-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Before the Third Division,

January 22, 1940

No. 43061.

#### Protest 983167-G of Samuel Shapiro & Co., Inc. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

There was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff when this case was called for trial. On the record presented the protest was overruled.
CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA - HQ - OW -2014-0598 DCN: SGE00 963 .A01     THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECA USE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
No. 46302.

#### Protests 997041-G/11756, etc., of M. Olaf H. Olsen, M. E. et al. (New Orleans, etc.).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Arturo Sanchez Rosario,

Petitioner

v.

Immigration and Customs

Enforcement and Warden, Marion

Correctional Institution,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 2:12-cv-0488

Judge Frost

Magistrate Judge Abel

ORDER

Petitioner Arturo Sanchez Rosario brings this action for writ of habeas corpus

under 28 U.S.C. §2251, which he styles a petition to vacate pending charges and

detainer. This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abel’s July 6, 2012 Report

and Recommendation recommending that the petition to vacate pending charges and

detainer be dismissed. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been

filed. 

Upon de novo review as required by 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B), the Court ADOPTS

the Report and Recommendation. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. 

This action is hereby DISMISSED. 

 /s/ Gregory L. Frost 

Gregory L. Frost

United States District Judge

Case: 2:12-cv-00488-GLF-MRA Doc #: 6 Filed: 08/06/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Before the Third Division,

April 20, 1944

No. 49359.

#### Protests 35476-K, etc., of James H. Rhodes & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From the testimony of the vice president of the importing firm and the records in *Stein*v. *United States,*6 Cust. Ct. 443, C. D. 511 (including exhibit 1), and *Pearson v. United States,*T. D. 47136 (including exhibit 5), affirmed in 23 C. C. P. A. 35 (T. D. 47684), which records were incorporated herein, the protests wore sustained as to certain Tam O’Shanter octagon sharpening hones, 7)4-8 inches by 3-4 inches, the Tam O’Shanter joiners hones, 6-7 inches by 2 inches bjr *%-l*inch, and Tam O’Shanter octagon blocks 7)1-8 inches, and 25 percent of such stones involved as measuring 8-10 inches by 2)£-4 inches.
(Reap. Dec. 9347)

#### Dyson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 789731; 789589.

(Decided March 17, 1959)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeals for a reap-praisement were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff and the cases were ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that — '

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 23.1













CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We hereby consent to the inclusion of our report dated March 31, 2014, for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, related to the financial statements of Marathon Patent Group, Inc. (Formerly American Strategic Minerals Corporation, which appear in Marathon Patent Group, Inc. on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) filed on or about June 11, 2014.
 
 
 
 /s/ KBL, LLP
 KBL, LLP
 New York, NY
 June 11, 2014














114 West 47th Street, 19th Floor, New York, NY 10036
212.785-9700
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CASTRO ENTERPRISES, INC.,

 Appellant,

v.

ROCIO MATA RELIFORD,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00079-CV

Appeal from

205th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2017DCV3879)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on Appellant’s motion to dismiss and concludes the 

motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed, in accordance with the opinion of 

this Court. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We further order Appellant to pay all costs of this 

appeal. We further order that this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
No. 56595.

protest 60684-K (Los Angeles).

#### Oscar Leistner, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

# ADDRESSES:

Tom Bradshaw, National Endowment for the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 616, Washington, DC 20506-0001, telephone 202-682-5527 (this is not a toll-free number), fax 202/682-5677. 

Murray Welsh, 

Director, Administrative Services, National Endowment for the Arts.

[FR Doc. E7-724 Filed 1-18-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

SUNLINK HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SunLink Health Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert M. Thornton, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|             |  |     |  |                            
|------------ |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|             |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert M. Thornton, Jr.
|             |  |     |  | Robert M. Thornton, Jr.    
|             |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer    
|May 14, 2009 |  |     |  |
Searched for **https://www.oge.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.oge.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
124 STAT. 4128 PUBLIC LAW 111–378—JAN. 4, 2011 

Public Law 111–378 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify Federal responsibility 

for stormwater pollution. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. FEDERAL RESPONSIBILITY TO PAY FOR STORMWATER 

PROGRAMS. 

Section 313 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 

U.S.C. 1323) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(c) REASONABLE SERVICE CHARGES.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For the purposes of this Act, reasonable 

service charges described in subsection (a) include any reasonable nondiscriminatory fee, charge, or assessment that is— 

‘‘(A) based on some fair approximation of the proportionate contribution of the property or facility to 

stormwater pollution (in terms of quantities of pollutants, 

or volume or rate of stormwater discharge or runoff from 

the property or facility); and 

‘‘(B) used to pay or reimburse the costs associated 

with any stormwater management program (whether associated with a separate storm sewer system or a sewer 

system that manages a combination of stormwater and 

sanitary waste), including the full range of programmatic 

and structural costs attributable to collecting stormwater, 

reducing pollutants in stormwater, and reducing the 

volume and rate of stormwater discharge, regardless of 

whether that reasonable fee, charge, or assessment is 

denominated a tax. 

‘‘(2) LIMITATION ON ACCOUNTS.— 

‘‘(A) LIMITATION.—The payment or reimbursement of 

any fee, charge, or assessment described in paragraph (1) 

shall not be made using funds from any permanent 

authorization account in the Treasury. 

‘‘(B) REIMBURSEMENT OR PAYMENT OBLIGATION OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.—Each department, agency, or 

instrumentality of the executive, legislative, and judicial 

branches of the Federal Government, as described in subsection (a), shall not be obligated to pay or reimburse 

any fee, charge, or assessment described in paragraph (1), 

except to the extent and in an amount provided in advance 

Jan. 4, 2011 

[S. 3481] 


anorris on DSK5R6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
PUBLIC LAW 111–378—JAN. 4, 2011 124 STAT. 4129 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 3481: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Dec. 21, considered and passed Senate. 

Dec. 22, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

by any appropriations Act to pay or reimburse the fee, 

charge, or assessment.’’. 

Approved January 4, 2011. 


anorris on DSK5R6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 

REGION IX
 

75 Hawthorne Street
 

San Francisco, CA 94105·3901
 

JUN 1 3 2011 

James Goldstene 

Executive Officer 

California Air Resource Board 

1001 I Street, Post Office Box 2815 

Sacramento, lifornia 95812 

- " On 'P<IIay 18,2011, you submitted the 2011 Progress Report on Implementation ofthe PM25 State 

Implementation Plans (SIP) for the South Coast and San Joaquin Valley Air Basins and Proposed SIP 

Revisions. This SIP submittal consists of revisions to the California SIP for the South Coast and San 

Joaquin Valley PM25 nonattainment areas. 

We have reviewed this package for completeness and found that it conforms to the completeness criteria 

in 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. 

If you have any questions regarding our review, please call me or have your staff contact J,isa l1anf, 

Chief of the Planning Office, at (415) 972-3854, hanflisa0';epa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

,t;AV(hZ4L/ o orah Jordan 7" ... yr 

Director, Air Division 

cc:	 Barry Wallerstein 

Executive Officer, South Coast Air Quality Management District 

Seyed Sadedrin
 

Executive Director, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
 

Prinud on l<tcydtd Paptr
Motion GRANTED and Order filed June 27, 2018. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00523-CV

____________

IN RE ATLANTIC SOUNDING CO INC., AND WEEKS MARINE, INC., 

Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

113th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-38112

ORDER

On June 26, 2018, relators Atlantic Sounding Co Inc., and Weeks Marine, 

Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. Relators ask this court to 

order the Honorable Michael Landrum, Judge of the 113th District Court, in Harris 

County, Texas, to set aside his order dated June 7, 2018, entered in trial court number 
2017-38112, styled Reco Graham v. Atlantic Sounding Co, Inc., and Weeks Marine, 

Inc.. Relators claim respondent abused his discretion by ordering them to produce 

documents and materials protected by the attorney client and work product 

privileges. 

Relators also filed a motion for temporary stay of proceedings below. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. Relators asked this court to stay proceedings in the 

trial court pending a decision on the petition for writ of mandamus.

It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relators’ request 

for relief requires further consideration and that relators will be prejudiced unless 

immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relators’ motion and 

issue the following order:

We ORDER the June 7, 2018 order entered in trial court cause number 2017-

38112, Reco Graham v. Atlantic Sounding Co, Inc., and Weeks Marine, Inc.,

STAYED until a final decision by this court on relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus, or until further order of this court.

In addition, the court requests Reco Graham, the real party-in-interest, to file 

a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before July 11, 2018. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 52.4.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Busby, Donovan, and Brown.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 74 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 74

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 2863) making appropriations 
for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
2006, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Representatives 
shall make the following corrections:
    Strike Division C, the American Energy Independence and Security 
Act of 2005 and Division D, the Distribution of Revenues and Disaster 
Assistance.

            Passed the Senate December 21, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 74

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Making appropriation for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year 
           ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes.
```