AUDERDALE

 Livable Downtown

THE CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA

Adopted: November 18, 2003

Incorporates changes from “May 2007 Master Plan Update”

FORT LAUDERDALE

 A Livable Downtown

CONSOLIDATED DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN for

THE CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA

Adopted: November 18, 2003

Incorporates changes from “May 2007 Master Plan Update”

iii

preface

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

Crossroads

dramatic

ping the

ontinuing

dale at a

uestions

from this

it be like

t? Will it

?

order to

erdale is

into the

owntown

as devel

ces have

ve vision

 in these

owntown

tory and

r visions. 

The Vision incorporates past efforts and defines the nextstep, as Downtown transitions from an emerging urbancore into a mature, vibrant city center. The next period of growth can transform Downtown intoa truly livable urban center, with diverse, healthy residential neighborhoods. It can knit together the urban fabricinto a seamless pattern of walkable, beautiful streets,public spaces, and buildings of the highest quality. It cancombine the energy and optimism of a rapidly growingcity with a balanced approach that tackles the seriouschallenges of traffic, parking, transit, schools, and infrastructure. The City must focus on all of these issues tocreate a truly livable Downtown, and to achieve the longterm economic sustainability that would accompany it. The next step is clear. The City’s leadership and itscitizens have chosen a positive path towards urbansuccess. As the Vision is implemented, the details ofthe Master Plan will change and adapt to unforeseencircumstances, but its core planning principles shouldbe maintained. The next natural step of FortLauderdale’s evolution is Building a Livable Downtown.

table of contents

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

v

ENTS

vi

viii

.1.3

.1.6

2.3 

2.4

2.10

.2.12

3.3

3.4

.3.10

3.16

3.20

3.26

3.36

updated CHAPTER 4: Design GuidelinesPreface..................................................................................................... 4.2An Overview.............................................................................................. 4.41 Principles of Street Design...................................................................4.52 Street Design Examples ......................................................................4.203 Principles of Building Design............................................................... 4.364 Quality of Architecture.......................................................................... 4.615 Principles of Storefront Design............................................................ 4.696 Character Area Guidelines................................................................... 4.767 Neighborhood Transition Areas........................................................... 4.868 Thematic Planning Districts..................................................................4.889 Principles of Riverfront Design.............................................................4.9010 Implementation...................................................................................4.96CHAPTER 5: ImplementationAn Overview...............................................................................................5.3Future Growth and Land Use................................................................ 5.6Design....................................................................................................... 5.8Planning Process......................................................................................5.10APPENDICESA: Zoning Analysis....................................................................................A.1B: Capacity & Green Space Analysis.......................................................B.1C: Market Analysis ...................................................................................C.1D: Street Design Requirements................................................................D.1E: Preliminary Capital Cost Analysis........................................................ E.1
ISSION

ioner

mmissioner - District III

 District I District II District IV

G COMMITTEE

r Architects - Chair

Chair, 

t of Urban & Regional Planning

 Architects

mmunities

Architecture

Civic Association

epresentative

tant, Kerr and Associates

nell Architects

or, Downtown Development Authority

 Development Corporation

ate, Inc. 

Lauderdale Investments, Inc. 

er Construction

unity Redevelopment Agency, 

derdale

ty

cial Services, Inc.

CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALEFloyd T. Johnson Former City ManagerAlan A. Silva Acting City ManagerGreg Kisela Assistant City ManagerBud Bentley Assistant City ManagerCecelia H. Hollar Director, Construction ServicesBruce D. Chatterton Planning and Zoning Services ManagerChris Barton Principal PlannerChristine Fisher Planner II (Project Manager)Rollin Maycumber Planner IMichelle Riley Administrative AideKathleen Connor Parks Planner Brenda Kelley NW Community Redevelopment AgencyMichael Matthias Economic Development ManagerDOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYGale M. Butler Chair; AutoNation, Inc.Doug Eagon Board member; Stiles Development Corp.Alan C. Hooper Secretary; Hooper ConstructionCharles B. Ladd, Jr. Vice Chair; Barron Real Estate, Inc. Jack Loos Treasurer; First Lauderdale Investments, William “Bill” Scherer Board Member; Conrad & Scherer Law FirmC.A. Stallworth Board member; Broward Community CollegeChris Wren Executive Director

introduction

EDGEMENTS FORT LAUDERDALE: Building a Livable Downtown
vii

acknowledgements

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

vii

ng

OTHER ORGANIZATIONS AND INDIVIDUALSAnthony Abbate, ArchitectBroward Center for the Performing ArtsBroward County Administrator's OfficeBroward County Board of County CommissionersBroward County EngineeringRobert Carr, Archaeological & Historical Conservancy, Inc.City of Fort Lauderdale Community Redevelopment AgencyDowntown Development Authority EDSA, C. Douglas Coolman First Baptist Church of Fort LauderdaleFlorida Atlantic University / Broward Community CollegeFlorida Department of Transportation District IVGlatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.Alan Gleichmann, ArtistThomas Gustafson, Attorney Gloria Katz, Former Commissioner District 1Deborah KerrThe Las Olas CompaniesDouglas McCraw, Peregrine Partners Group, Inc.New Phase Realty Corp.John O’Brien, VisPlan, Inc.Riverfront Fort Lauderdale, Inc.Riverwalk TrustGreg Stuart, Broward County Office of Urban Planning & RedevelopmentThe Sun-Sentinel, Broward EditionWallace, Roberts & Todd, LLCZyscovich Architects
mission has placed a high

 Downtown Urban Design

2002, the Commission

ban Design Core Steering

e to provide oversight,

mulation of the plan. In

elopment Authority voted

Consolidated Downtown

ity selected the team of

eenberg Consultants, Inc.

ects & Planners LLP. 

ey issues for the future of

hese is the need to plan

initiatives, while creating

e with private investment.

c sustainability, to protect

vestments that have been

ed heavily in planning, in

 land use, zoning, transportation, affordable housing, community facilities and infrastructure. These ongoing efforts have occurred independently, however. Although a large body of work has developed, there has been no "big picture" study which integrates these efforts in a comprehensive vision for Downtown. The Consolidated Downtown Master Plan is a response to the need for such a study. The Master Plan has been conceived and supported by a wide variety of institutions and individuals, establish- ing a broad and diverse constituency critical to the Plan's success. Recognizing that good design is creat- ed in a dialogue, the planning process has been struc- tured around a series of public workshops, with an extensive public and stakeholder outreach program. Continued public involvement is key to the success of the Plan.

TION

HE MASTER PLAN 
introduction

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

ix

[Figure 0.1] Study area boundary in relation to the City of Fort Lauderdale boundary. 

[Figure 0.2] Study area boundary corresponds to

the boundary of the Downtown “Regional ActivityCenter” (RAC).

KEY

City Boundary

Downtown RAC 

Master Plan Boundary

INTRODUCTION

ocument,

decision

al design

 circum

ad-map",

ncluding

s, proce

ncentives

ms, and

endations

range of

 projects

rnmental

clean-up,

re costs.

n to exist

 basis for

Public

approach

ons. 

 used to

ster Plan.

rom the

over time

he Plan.

DOWNTOWN RACEstablished by 1989 Comprehensive Plan Regional Activity Center (Broward County Plan)Mixed-Use Designation5,100 residential unit allocation1997 additional Zoning designations adopted

1.1 Square Miles

750 Acres135 City Blocks

THE VISION

1

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

chapter

1

the vision

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

1.3

trengths.

ful urban

residents

with this

sh green

ty of Las

story. 

wntown,

ts have

imited in

-another.

egrating

 are not

me, vast

 activity,

ng in the

 by utiliz

owntown

ive, and

nitiatives,

mbined to

ther. The

a strong

providing

 a desir

ers of the

1.3
ed-use Downtown, combining new homes with

urants, and places for art, culture and civic life...

The Vision is of a Downtown with destinations, activities and places

that appeal to both residents and to visitors...

a Downtown which is a great place to walk - with appealing

tecture, lots of activity, and the comfortable shade of

y lush tree canopy...

The Vision is for Downtown neighborhoods with parks, local shopping, and housing for

many types of families and people of different incomes...
1

the vision

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

1.5

VISION

ntown, lushly landscaped, and promoting the health of the

ly the New River... 

an active and dynamic destination, easy to find

y connects the north and south sides of town...

for a Downtown with many ways to get around, including transit such as

ators, or trolleys, and also bicycles, so more people can leave their cars...

Ramblas, Barcelona, Spain Riverwalk, San Antonio, Texas Rockefeller Center, New York, New York

aces...
al redevelopment

st-growing regions, Fort Lauderdale has lagged dramatically behind neighboring civic centers in popula

icate a rebirth of city living, Downtown Fort Lauderdale is poised to support a significant increase in its

, will support and sustain future economic development and urban vitality. Increased Downtown redevel

onsible, sustainable way that can create a vibrant, mixed-use city center. 

 Downtown, with supporting amenities

essential for the long-term growth of the Downtown. Housing opportunities should exist for a variety of

orkforce housing, live-work units, family-oriented housing, and luxury condominiums are just a few of the

st to encourage a diverse Downtown population. Along with increased number and variety of units,

ure must be provided. Schools, parks, and transit, to name a few, must keep pace with a growing residen

borhood character and distinct identity

e enough area that distinct identities have begun to emerge among its various neighborhoods. Building

ch area, these distinct identities should be strengthened and encouraged, avoiding approaches that are

radic to create a sense of place. A variety of building scales, mixtures of uses, and architectural expres

a of the Downtown RAC into smaller memorable neighborhoods that establish a clear 'mental map' of the

rinciples

et of shared ideals and goals that drive the Master Plan recommendations. They result from broad consensus

uding the public, stakeholders, and City leaders and staff. These principles are used to provide criteria for measur

 urban design and planning proposals, both within the Master Plan, and for future planning efforts Downtown.
1.7

1

the vision

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

1.7

PLANNING PRINCIPLES

1.7

Focus most intense development in a compact core

 create a more unified, active Downtown with areas of distinct character and more

eak in a compact core, and gradually scale down into surrounding neighborhoods.

ut the most intensive, commercially-oriented, 'central business district'-type develop

 the core. 

Surround the core with strong, walkable, mixed-income neighborhoods

wn core are vital. Neighborhoods should be pedestrian-friendly, connected by transit,

dale can take advantage of the current proximity of neighborhoods within walking

k of barriers, such as freeways, common in other cities. Vibrant mixed-income neigh

own and create a continuous network of walkable streets. Walkable streets along with

ce car trips and foster transit, walking and cycling. 

Create extroverted, pedestrian friendly buildings

on active, interesting ground floor uses. 'Extroverted' buildings have active retail,

ltiple openings, such as storefront or residential entrances are encouraged to provide

, including awnings and arcades, add to the visual richness of streets and provide a

ank walls, landscaped setbacks, and inactive uses, such as ground floor parking, are

principle 4principle 5principle 6
tments and existing resources

e reflects several waves of public and private investment that have given Fort Lauderdale a strong founda

s Master Plan. Areas of previous investment, such as the Riverwalk, should be leveraged to achieve even

d resources should be valued. Future growth and development should build upon these past successes

ould not be seen as a 'clean slate'. 

rridor a top priority

alk are among the most memorable and successful places in Downtown. However, each is incomplete,

nnected to each other. The next phase of growth can complete the vision of a unified Las Olas - Riverwalk

al public space. Strongly linking these two areas is the key to leveraging public investment and visitor

nefit to the City and an increase in property values. It should be a unique, urban centerpiece for the new

h juxtaposition of the linear, urban street and the winding, natural river. 

 and better connect the two sides

arrier into a seam, by improving connections between the north and south sides, and improving public

 Accessible and friendly pedestrian crossings, completion of the Riverwalk 'loop', and transit connections

ategies that can contribute to this goal. 
1

the vision

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

1.9

PLANNING PRINCIPLES

Green the Downtown with a connected system of parks, trails and streets

remarkable South Florida climate and the ability to quickly grow lush landscapes. A

ly transform the city's image and increase pedestrian comfort levels. The 'greening'

eation of new parks to sustain the anticipated population growth, the creation of trails

 systems, and the comprehensive planting of street-trees throughout Downtown. 

Provide alternatives to the car: walking, transit and cycling

natives to the car become increasingly important. In addition to widespread pedes

d bicycle-friendly improvements are critical. An increased population of Downtown

uns on frequent intervals and utilizes environmentally-sensitive, or 'green', technolo

connect into a regional trail system. The shift from car-only transportation to a multi

ortation options for more types of people (the elderly, the young, those without cars,

nsportation network, while reducing the impacts of increased traffic.

onnect to the surrounding neighborhoods, the beach, and regional destinations

tions to and from the surrounding neighborhoods and the beach. As the area's most

hould be easily accessible to Downtown residents; likewise, Downtown as an urban

nts and tourists. A fully-integrated transit system would also connect Downtown with

orhoods and Districts, such as the Hospital District just south of The Downtown study

principle 10principle 11principle 12

CONTEXTS2

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

chapter

[Figure 2.1] Coastal ‘linear city’ growth pattern, approximately 10 to 20 miles wide.

(Image from NASA) 

2.3

2

contexts

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

 the 750

mprehen

regional,

physical

ns have

er trends

.

nalysis of
rida has developed in the

hing from Palm Beach to

urban pattern is unique in

 geographic constraints of

erglades.

Everglades Watershed is

ure of the region. Water

Wildlife Refuges, and

cies have established an

el to the Atlantic coastline.

at the midpoint of South

corridor.

nvironmental reclamation

althy water flow patterns

 historic agricultural and

 defined areas for urban

ses, and environmental

rk for future growth.

Broward County forms an east-west "slice" of the SouthFlorida linear city pattern. The Everglades create a hardboundary for urban growth, limiting the new land available in the county. The "sprawl" pattern of automobileoriented development consumes land at a rapid pace,using up this limited resource inefficiently. Westwardgrowth is thus quickly reaching its natural limits.With nowhere else to go, new development must moveback into older suburbs and urban centers. Infill and"Smart Growth" strategies can allow these areas tobenefit from this trend by promoting revitalization ofexisting urban areas, economic development, and useof mass transit.Downtowns are logical locations for increased density,given their historic role as regional hubs. Downtown FortLauderdale has played a key role in the history of SouthFlorida and Broward County. The goals and principlesof the Master Plan are synchronized with those of theRegional Activity Center (RAC): they support the continued relevance of Downtown Fort Lauderdale as thecivic, cultural, and economic hub of the county. 
2.5

2

contexts

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

[Figure 2.6] right: The Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan

(CERP) attempts to recreate the historic southwesterly water flow and

define urbanized, agricultural, and conservation zones.

(Images from South Florida Water Management District)

Water Conservation Area Water Conservation Area

Alligator Alley Alligator Alley

Broward County Broward County

Ft. Lauderdale

Water Conservation Area Water Conservation Area

Alligator Alley Alligator Alley

Broward County Broward County

Ft. Lauderdale

Boca Raton Boca Raton Boca Raton Boca Raton

Pompano Bch. Pompano Bch. 

Hollywood Hollywood Hollywood Hollywood

Coral Springs Coral Springs Coral Springs Coral SpringsMiramar Miramar

Plantation Plantation Plantation PlantationSunrise Sunrise Sunrise Sunrise

REGION
d along the banks of the

connections between the

eas. The emergence of

ay to the east, and the

m to the west, established

etwork of regional water

astructure elements.

 railroad (Henry Flagler's

a's entire east coast)

uderdale to the rest of the

ually, commuter railroad

nt patterns and shifted

 of the historic transporta

FEC line is currently used

red with the north-south

 Federal Highway has

with bigger and faster

er west, and further away

egional interaction with

-west "boulevards", bring

m I-95 and the Florida

In addition to these systems of ground transportation,Downtown Fort Lauderdale continues to benefit from itsimportant relationship to nearby airports and the PortEverglades seaport.
2.7

2

contexts

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown REGION

derdale bound

HolidayPark

Birch StatePark

BonnetHouse

Ft. LauderdaleBeach

South BeachPark

PortEverglades

CroissantPark

Water Bus

Sunrise

Blvd.

Las Olas

Blvd.

A1A

To

Airport

ConventionCenter

CruiseTerminal

HospitalDistrict

[Figure 2.11] The Downtown Study Area, shown in dark purple, with connections to important

nearby destinations. 

l

Intracoastal

Waterway

Rt -1

N N
er patterns of regional growth

cknowledge Fort Lauderdale's

n Broward County, the govern

historic urban center, and one

destinations in South Florida.

ected growth in the region,

westward expansion, creates a

of well-planned 'infill' develop

own Fort Lauderdale has the

ble, mature, vibrant city center,

le of 'smart growth' within the

oals for reducing sprawl.

art growth’ strategies such as

d development are increasingly

he inefficiencies and shortcom

er with underutilized land and

dale is an ideal candidate for

rican cities which have placed

lopment downtown, especially

and economic development.

 advantages.

build upon its inherent, natural

vable urban core and civic hub

graphic location, with proximity

-south highways, intracoastal

nt geographic features, such as

her waterways; natural foliage,

with its large variety of fast-growing and distinctive trees andplants; and climate, which allows year-round outdoor activity andlandscaping possibilities. Several of these natural advantages areunique to Downtown Fort Lauderdale, such as the New River'smeandering path through Downtown, and have the potential todistinguish the Downtown and create a true sense of place.Improve Downtown connections to regional and statewidemass transit infrastructure.One of the most important needs identified by the DowntownMaster Plan, a coordinated multi-modal transit plan for BrowardCounty and the entire South Florida region is essential to the futuresuccess of Downtown Fort Lauderdale and other urban centers.Passenger rail service should be encouraged and planned on theexisting FEC line that runs through Downtown. Conversion hasbeen discussed by various parties for a number of years; althoughthere are numerous obstacles, it is potentially the single mostimportant catalyst for the revitalization of city centers up and downFlorida's east coast, including Downtown Fort Lauderdale. Thereturn of passenger rail service to Downtown would decreasecommuter automobile traffic, activate streets with pedestrians,provide Downtown residents with convenient transit connectionsalong the Florida coast, and catalyze rapid economic development. While current regional commuter rail service remains west ofDowntown along the current Tri-Rail line, better transit connectionsshould connect to and from Downtown westward to the FortLauderdale Tri-Rail station. Links should be frequent, Downtownstops should be well-located and well-designed, and clean-air
2.9

2

contexts

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown REGION

be highly

ansit links

 the Fort

wn could

umbers of

ss through

ons.

onal transit

 neighbor

benefits of

out relying

 for short,

od transit

especially

the area's

ale Beach

ctions to

increases,

beach will

 can enjoy

ements to

tudied. 

d Broward

Downtown

ment base

sit should

Enhance regional access with a variety of transportationoptions.A greater variety of transportation options allows for greaterfreedom of movement, less reliance on the automobile, and thepossibility of recreational transportation options, such as bicyclingon a regional trail system.Provide a network of bicycle trails and lanes that connect withongoing county-wide bike trail proposals. Fort Lauderdale shouldtake advantage of ongoing County initiatives to create a countywide, comprehensive bike and trail-way plan by creating anintegrated system within the RAC. Improve water bus service, facilities, and public awareness. Thespecial quality of water-based transit helps to define a memorable,exciting image for Fort Lauderdale. Few cities offer this option, andFort Lauderdale should continue to take advantage of improvedwater-bus service. Routes should be clear, service should befrequent, and public awareness should be greatly improved.Current maps and signage are often inadequate, especially fortourists. Plan for a multi-modal transportation hub Downtown to servethe entire region.As the civic and urban center of Broward County, Downtown FortLauderdale could sustain a central multi-modal transportation hubfor the entire region. Ideally, this would include a connection to thepotential FEC passenger rail service described above. The transportation hub would generate increased pedestrian traffic andeconomic vitality to the heart of the Downtown. 

[Figure 2.15] Dixie Highway Trail map.[Figure 2.16] Water taxi service.
 several waves of public

sformed Downtown Fort

ime when Downtown was

lopment was occurring

c investment during this

and faith that Downtown

its role as the civic hub of

f public projects included

rking, transportation, and,

focus on the riverfront as

blic open space to anchor

ly paid off with an exten

ent. Initially this develop

 office and commercial

vestment is transforming

nd is beginning to spread

The emerging pattern of

 shift to residential devel

rent or pending projects

d interest in housing for

Snapshot of Real Estate Market Conditions:

Office Sector:

 Fort Lauderdale Central Business District (CBD) has

represented approxImately. 15 to 20 percent of theBroward County office inventory for the past 20 years.

 The long term health of office employment growth is

reasonably strong .

 Construction Since 1980: approxImately. 190,000

square feet per year.

Retail Sector:

 70 percent of projected retail demand comes from

new residents and workers.

 The need exists for a broader merchandise mix than in

the past including supermarkets, pharmacies, andlarge general merchandisers.

Residential Sector:

 The luxury rental market is heavily driven by Downtown

and nearby employment trends.

 The for-sale market relies on a combination of

downtown employees, lifestyle purchasers, andsecond home purchasers.

 There is a strong, largely untapped market for housing

beyond the luxury market for housing at various ofprice points.

 There is a critical need to provide “workforce” housing

in the Downtown area to ensure housing options for thewhole community.

ATE MARKET

 & Private Investment
KEY

Public ProjectsPrivate DevelopmentsCurrent or Pending Public ProjectsCurrent or Pending Private Developments

2

contexts

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

2.11

ainment, Riverwalk 1993-2002: Large-scale private investment in Downtown Today: Continued rapid pace of change and spread to 

outlying districts

REAL ESTATE MARKET
an "sprawl" have diverted

is trend is reversing as

natural boundary of the

er, eastern suburbs and

he new frontier for future

d, Fort Lauderdale has

share of regional popula

e when compared to other

nty.

With a population growth of approximately 29.2%(approxImately. 370,000 people) between 1990 and2000 county-wide, Fort Lauderdale grew by only 2.1%.Fort Lauderdale has lagged dramatically behind neighboring civic centers in population growth. An increasedresidential population is necessary to support andsustain economic development and urban vitality.DENSITYThe 750-acre Downtown RAC has an unusually smallresidential population when compared to successfulurban areas of similar sizes. Examples such asSavannah, Coral Gables, South Beach and Charlestondemonstrate the kinds of livable urban environmentsthat include commercial development, dense mixedincome housing and strong networks of parks andpublic spaces. Both Savannah and South Beach havepedestrian-friendly, walkable urban districts andresidential densities in the range of 20,000 dwellingunits in areas similar to that of the Downtown FortLauderdale RAC.

PHICS

ections

Ft. Lauderdale

Boca Raton Boca Raton Boca Raton Boca Raton

Pompano Bch. Pompano Bch. 

Hollywood Hollywood Hollywood Hollywood

Coral Springs Coral Springs Coral Springs Coral SpringsMiramar Miramar

Plantation Plantation Plantation PlantationSunrise Sunrise Sunrise Sunrise

Pop. 74,764 21.6% growth (10 yr.)Pop. 117,549 49.1% growth (10 yr.)Pop. 72,73978.9% growth (10 yr.)Pop. 139,35714.5% growth (10 yr.)Pop. 82,93424.1% growth (10 yr.)Pop. 85,77930.6% growth (10 yr.)Pop. 78,191 8% growth (10 yr.)Pop. 152,397 2.1% growth (10 yr.)
2

contexts

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

[Figure 2.21] Downtown Coral Gables,

Florida with the RAC boundary overlaid atthe same scale.

2.13

[Figure 2.22] Historic Charleston, South

Carolina with the RAC boundary overlaid atthe same scale.

Refer to Appendix B for a more detailedCapacity Study.

DEMOGRAPHICS

Current Density (Gross) of housingunits Downtown:approxImately. 5 dwelling units/acreCurrent Population Downtown: approxImately. 7,340Population of RAC if potentialdevelopment sites are developedat densities similar to othercomparable, livable Downtownareas:approxImately. 28,000 - 37,000residents

n Miami, Florida

rlaid at the
wn to achieve the critical mass

 vibrant 24/7 community.

Downtown residential growth

ansportation, infrastructure,

nities with the urban design

ment, plan for new community

shopping, upgraded utilities,

he long-term financial implica

ment capacity, and determine

City and the project developer.

Strive to attract a diverse population, along with diversehousing types and affordability levels.Embrace the demand for Downtown housing to encourage thedevelopment of workforce housing.Create minimum standards for the provision of integratedworkforce housing in new residential development. Integrateworkforce housing units with market rate housing throughout theentire RAC.Consider inclusionary and incentive-based zoning regulations toprovide workforce housing. Also utilize CRA tools, partnerships,grants, etc. to provide and integrate the units.Support the preparation of a Housing Study for the DowntownRAC.Implement the Framework Plan that allows for a variety of buildingtypes that will accommodate a range of housing and family types,including townhomes, walk-up apartments, live-work units, studenthousing, high-rise condos, and others. 

8 1,954,572 2,273,287 2,548,3038 1,949,400 2,289,900 2,612,7008 1,974,500 2,329,020

0 351,412 354,520 283,680

ATION PROJECTIONS

2010 2020 2030
FRAMEWORK 3

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

chapter

owntown

mination

hese are

ionships

es in the

ext, the

s: 

followed

y recom

specific

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK BLVD

BROWARD BLVD

LAS OL

NEW RIVER

TARPON RIVER

DAVIE BLVD

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE

HOLIDAY PARK

WARFIELD

PARK

HARDY

PARK

STRANAHANPARK

TARPON RIVER PARK

RIVERWALK

FLAGLER GREENWAY Min. 1 new Pocket Park per dashed boundary

Min. 1 new Pocket Parkper dashed boundary

[Figure 3.1] Framework Plan diagram showing several proposed urban design

themes overlaid.

3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

3.3
OLAS & RIVERWALK CORRIDOR

ons

 for improving Downtown

mpacts can be effectively

sting strengths. Two great

d and the Riverwalk, are

ficant public and private

 Fort Lauderdale can do

and leverage these great

Corridor (which includes

rrently consists of a series

stitutions. Some pockets

sful than others; some

ain times and others are

ne are well-connected to

hat the sum of the parts

than any of the individual

unity to create a continu

ity by filling in critical gaps

ts of active street life. 

as Olas, meanders along

, too, has areas of varying

plete areas on both sides,

blic waterfront access.

nd landscaped, several

nsisting of little more than

a sidewalk along the water. With the influx of largescale condo high-rises fronting the river, fewer andfewer sites remain for more generous Riverwalk dimensions. Most critically, recent development has left theRiverwalk devoid of daily activity except for occasionallarge organized events. As a result, the Riverwalk’spotential to be a focus of public life has been compromised. Riverwalk completion along both sides of theriver, along with strategically-placed river crossings,would allow for a continuous recreational loop.Remaining opportunities to create retail, cultural andother activity along the river should not be lost.Unfortunately, the Las Olas and Riverwalk Corridors arealso poorly connected to one another, leaving a missedopportunity for creating a synergy between them.Completion of both corridors, with better links betweenthem, could create a compelling, memorable urbancenterpiece and the focus of Downtown. This wouldrequire improved north-south connections, includingone or more distinctive pedestrian river-crossings. Aferry or 'signature' pedestrian bridge could provide aspectacular new 'postcard view' for Fort Lauderdale andcreate a much-needed, easy pedestrian connectionacross the New River. Strengthening and connectingthese two key corridors can create a strong pedestrianfocus for Downtown with a linked set of destinations.
3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

3.5

THE LAS OLAS & RIVERWALK CORRIDOR

corridor are

[Figure 3.6] SW 2nd Street pedestrian activity.

[Figure 3.9] Las Olas Boulevard dining &

retail, Downtown’s most successful example.

[Figure 3.7] Las Olas ‘Riverfront’ destination retail.

[Figure 3.8] ‘Downtown’ Las Olas Boulevard.

BCD

Las Olas Corridor

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK BLVD

BROWARD BLVD

LAS OL

NEW RIVER

TARPON RIVER

DAVIE BLVD

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE

[Figure 3.5] Just south of the Las Olas Corridor, the Riverwalk is the most successful public

park in the Downtown area, creating a distinct sense of place based on Fort Lauderdale'sstrongest identifying feature, the New River. Though it links several neighborhoods along itslength, it is less successful at connecting the River's two sides. 

A
nuous, walkable, urban prome

een existing pockets of active

nue and the area above the Federal

 ground floor retail or other active

reation uses along the south side).

uilding site on the north side of Las

ws and noise of Federal Highway

venue and SE 3rd Avenue: Provide

er active uses in the few remaining

, specifically at the empty FAU/BCC

possible solutions for activating the

transparent entry or possible gift

3rd and SW 4th Avenues: Provide

r active uses in remaining develop

sion of the current restaurant and

7th Avenue and SW 5th Avenue:

ue and SW 2nd Street with ground

ore the possibility of retrofitting the

with active uses.

Complete the Riverwalk Corridor. Fill in the missing 'pieces' along the North and South sides of theNew River, providing continuous public access on both sidesstretching from the Federal Highway tunnel westward to the 4th/7th Avenue bridge.

:: ACTION

Require all future riverfront development stretching from the 7th/4thAvenue bridge to Federal Highway to provide public riverfront access inaccordance with an updated Riverwalk Master Plan. The City shouldactively pursue riverfront access between SW 1st and SW 4th Avenue,the key remaining 'missing link' in the Riverwalk park.

:: ACTION

Require remaining riverfront development to provide ground floor restaurant, retail, cultural, or other active uses to activate the Riverwalk edges.A variety of experiences along the Riverwalk, occurring at various timesof the day, is crucial to its success.

:: ACTION

Update the existing Riverwalk Master Plan and create Riverwalk-specificDesign Guidelines. 

RWALK CORRIDOR

g

o

a

l 2
3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

3.7

THE LAS OLAS & RIVERWALK CORRIDOR

e a contin

g the New

the Federal

acent to the

e landings.

a, including

 considered

EC rail line

sed Flagler

een the two

e. Create an

idge, highly

e Riverwalk

Better connect the Riverwalk and the Las Olas Corridor.Combine these two parallel pedestrian spaces into an integratedurban experience and a defining element of Downtown. Increasethe perception of close proximity of each space, and bring some ofthe vitality of 'old' Las Olas & Himmarshee Village to the Riverwalk.

:: ACTION

Encourage strong north-south pedestrian connections between the LasOlas and Riverwalk Corridors at every possible location, in particular atpublic rights-of-way. 

:: ACTION

Introduce new ground floor retail, active uses, streetscape improvements, plazas and other 'green connections' to encourage street activity.

:: ACTION

Introduce an integrated signage and wayfinding system to assistconnections for residents and visitors.

:: ACTION

New development shall not block any existing street, alley, or other rightof-way to the Riverwalk. Provide mid-block connections where possible.

goal 4

[Figure 3.13] Monumental pedestrian bridge

in Spain by Calatrava. 

[Figure 3.12] Potential pedestrian bridge design produced by Alan

Gleichmann at a Community Public Workshop.

[Figure 3.14] Suspended movable

pedestrian cab in Bilbao, Spain.
RWALK CORRIDOR

2ND ST

4TH ST

SE 5TH CT SE 5T

BLVD

N RIO VISTA DR

8TH AVE 8TH AVE 8TH AVE

SE 9TH AVE SE 9TH AVE SE 9TH

SE 10TH AVE SE 10TH AVE SE

SE 11TH AVE SE 11TH AVE

SE 10TH TER SE 10TH TER SE

LAS

New River

RANAHAN

RK

IZENGA

RK

SMOKER

PARK
3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

3.9

THE LAS OLAS & RIVERWALK CORRIDOR

[Figure 3.17] Existing Riverwalk.

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRU

BROW

NEW

TAR

DAVIE BLVD

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE

[Figure 3.18] Key map.
nt began along the banks

and later, Seminole native

 river. White planters and

the construction of forts

he name Fort Lauderdale.

nchored by Stranahan's

ng and was then trans

er's East Coast Railway in

n 1911 and established as

d County in 1915, Fort

tinued to increase. Fort

on to the water was inten

of marshland to create a

aimed land for building,

ce of America"; and, later,

velopment and tourism.

Downtown Fort Lauderdale survived long periods of disinvestment, and eventually rebounded with waves ofpublic and private reinvestment. A resurgence ofresidential demand is currently transforming both theskyline and urban character of the area.Despite the ever-changing urban landscape, vestiges ofDowntown's urban history are evident to the carefulobserver: the Stranahan House; the original street gridcentered around the railroad and the river; StranahanPark, preserving a portion of the old Cypress Swamps;the historic Flagler Rail Line; and remnants of a onceexpansive commercial canal system. Other importanthistorical traces have been lost, such as the oncevibrant 'main street' along the old Andrews Avenue. 

E & L E G A C Y

tory & Past Strengths

-1945: Shows higher density develop

 shifting eastward. 1945-1950: Shows the importance of the ‘working’ river’s edge to the life of the city 1984-present: Transformation of urban form with high-rise buildings, bulkier

massing and parking garages
3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

3.11

HERITAGE & LEGACY

LAS OLAS B

RIVER

PON RIVER

nal Cypress 

p & 

 System

r

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK BLVD

BROWARD BLVD

LAS OLAS B

NEW RIVER

TARPON RIVER

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE

Expanded Street Grid

Historic Andrews Ave'Main Street'

Historic'Town Square'

odern street grid

[Figure 3.22] Historic and contemporary

views of Andrews Avenue show a strikingtransformation.

[Figure 3.21] Expanded city grid showing the importance of Andrews Avenue as 'Downtown’s

Main Street' and the appearance of Stranahan Park as the historic 'Town Square.'
f significant architectural

e already been lost. For a

e, the number of remain

e small. Efforts should be

on and maintenance of

the decaying Southside

In addition to designated

e several non-designated

nce that should be valued

t plans. These include:

 in the F.A.T. Village area;

 Deco structures in the

significant examples of

 the Public Library (whose

s a longtime partner of

e in the history of modern

Federal Courthouse. 

In addition to buildings, landscapes of significant importance, though not officially designated, should bevalued and preserved where possible. A few examplesinclude: the immense banyan trees adjacent to the 'OneStop Shop' city building off of Andrews Avenue; theSmoker Park cluster of shade trees; and the streettrees planted along 'old' Las Olas between FederalHighway and the Himmarshee Canal. CULTURAL LEGACYDowntown's cultural legacy remains one of its greateststrengths. A cluster of significant cultural institutionsincludes: the Performing Arts Center, Museum ofScience, Old Fort Lauderdale Village & Museum, theHistorical Society, the Museum of Art, and FloridaAtlantic University and Broward Community College.With the Public Library just to the north, this ensembleof diverse cultural destinations will anchor theDowntown far into the future and should be recognizedand enhanced with future development.

RITAGE LANDSCAPE HERITAGE
3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE: Building a Livable Downtown

3.13

HERITAGE & LEGACY

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK BLVD

BROWARD BLVD

LAS OLAS B

NEW RIVER

TARPON RIVER

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE

SmokerPark

Las OlasStreetscape

Tarpon RiverPark

One-stop Shop Landscape

Stranahan Park

ParkerPlayhouse

Auditorium

FAU / BCC

Public Library

CinemaParadiso

Museum

Old Fort of ArtLauderdaleVillage & Museum / Historical Society

City Hall

Museumof Science

PAC

 of

[Figure 3.24] Heritage landscapes and cultural institutions or sites.

LAS OLAS B

RIVER

PON RIVER

ahan

e 

marshee

rt Apts.

[Figure 3.25] Progresso Plaza.[Figure 3.26] Federal Courthouse.[Figure 3.27] Canal Photo.[Figure 3.28] Las Olas streetscape.
Encourage preservation of existing designated historic structures and interiors.

:: ACTION

Continue funding and support for ongoing city-wide historic and archaeological documentation.

:: ACTION

Encourage the restoration and possible re-use of the Southside Schoolfor a public use (possibly its historic function as a school).

:: ACTION

Encourage the restoration of the few remaining historic structuresDowntown.

:: ACTION

Encourage design excellence for new structures and discourage newdevelopments from imitating historic styles.

ric features related to Fort

layers of richness and histori

de geographic elements, infra

rid.

eet grid patterns within the RAC,

the practice of vacating city streets

ing purposes.

brant street life and 'main street'

ews Avenue area. 

g

o

a

l 2
Encourage preservation of historic and significant landscapes.

:: ACTION

Maintain the publicly owned landscape at the corner of NW 2nd Streetand Andrews Avenue (currently the One Stop Shop) and preserve themature trees behind the existing building. Redevelop the entire blockinto a neighborhood park as illustrated in the Open Space subsection ofthe Framework.

:: ACTION

Encourage preservation and enhancement of the historic landscape atStranahan Park, on land that was part of the original Cypress swampand canal system, reinforcing its legacy as one of the few remainingnatural features Downtown.

:: ACTION

Work to keep the Tarpon River clean, encourage the preservation of thelandscapes along its edges where possible, and encourage increasedpublic access along its edges where possible.

:: ACTION

Treat the Las Olas streetscape (between Federal Highway and theTarpon River) as a significant historic landscape whose features shouldbe maintained and preserved.

3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

3.15

HERITAGE & LEGACY

structures

za building,

toric impor

ng Federal

c or institu

servation of

tions to the

 significant

ar attention

pleasing.

n the Flagler

es of the Art

ructures by

ortant defin

[Figure 3.31] Downtown Public Library.

goal 4

[Figure 3.32] FAT Village Warehouse.[Figure 3.34] Stranahan Park.[Figure 3.33] One Stop Shop landscape.
amework Plan and Design

ironmentally sustainable

at includes: mixed-use,

s; areas of higher density

dantly landscaped open

ecifically, the Framework

own’s relationship to the

advantage of Downtown’s

er and canals) and native

ort Lauderdale’s identity

r of environmental goals.

QUALITY

ement techniques in the

proved. Large portions of

street system drain into a

New River. The two filtra

he north side of the river,

without utilizing advanced

orm water drainage basin

r with no filtration. This

, given the success of the

mportance of public river

es at storm water outlets

ze impervious surfaces

ntown, can go a long way

ion of the New River. 

AIR QUALITYAir quality in most of South Florida rarely reachesunhealthy levels due to the coastal location and windpatterns. However, increasing dependence on theautomobile and sprawl patterns of development inevitably lead to higher levels of vehicle-produced pollution.Likewise, high density development Downtown couldalso create increased congestion and pollution ifautomobile-oriented development is the predominantgrowth model. Multi-modal transportation options mustbe explored, with an increased focus on pedestrian andbicycle mobility, and various forms of public transit.SUSTAINABLE BUILDING DESIGNMost Downtown buildings do not respond to specificclimactic issues in terms of materials, shading devices,and energy-efficient design. Given the local climacticconditions, requiring high-energy consumption for airconditioned space, an increased awareness of greenbuilding technologies could greatly benefit Downtownfrom an economic as well as an environmental point ofview. While creating better quality environments forhuman health, the LEED (Leadership in Energy andEnvironmental Design) guidelines have emerged inrecent years as a model for advocating sustainablebuilding design and should be encouraged in futuredesign and construction Downtown.

nt

ner Downtown
3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE: Building a Livable Downtown

3.17

ENVIRONMENT

[Figure 3.35] Diagram showing the extent of the storm water shed areas that drain into a

small stretch of the New RIver. 

Primary StormwaterDrainage Basin

StormwaterDrainage Basin

Secondary StormwaterDrainage Basin

Secondary Stormwater

StormPump Stations

StormwaterOutfalls

wn area

ent tree

RAC has

dramatic

of tree

st to the

orhoods.

in the

tent tree

eratures.

 surface

s pedes

king. A

creased

nificantly

[Figure 3.36] Existing Downtown Storm

Pump Station along the New River.
Encourage environmentally-friendly, fuel/energy efficient,

'green' building design.

:: ACTION

Encourage the widespread use of LEED (Leadership in Energy andEnvironmental Design) design standards through a strategy of "government leading by example" in forthcoming public projects. (See Figure3.41)

:: ACTION

Encourage the use of LEED design standards through policy initiativesand incentives to the private sector.

Increase pedestrian comfort Downtown.Reduce heat build-up and shade-free areas to create a comfortable walking environment.

:: ACTION

Maximize the tree canopy downtown through increases in both streetand park trees.

:: ACTION

Maximize the use of ground-floor shading devices on buildings, whichcreates a more comfortable, shaded environment for pedestrians on thesidewalk as well as a reduction in heat gain for interior building uses.

r.

water management solutions and

 includes: reducing the amount of

polluted stormwater runoff into the

or various techniques for reducing

surface parking lots); 'greening'

f street sweeping.

technically advanced solutions for

ets. Techniques include advanced

all discharge points along the river.

ng water-based transit.

t incorporate clean-air technologies.

ed-use growth which decreases the

s.

endly options for Downtown. 

y to decrease airborne pollutants.

g

o

a

l 3

g

o

a

l 4
[Figure 3.40] Proposed Downtown conditions sowing a combination of new parks, street

trees, and improved existing parks can help return downtown to a greener, healthier environment.

3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE: Building a Livable Downtown

3.19

ENVIRONMENT

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK BLVD

BROWARD BLVD

LAS OLAS BL

NEW RIVER

TARPON RIVER

DAVIE BLVD

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE

LAS OLAS BL

RIVER

ON RIVER

the ‘Urban

other

[Figure 3.41] Example of building designed

using the principles of Sustainable BuildingDesign 

What is LEED?The LEED (Leadership in Energy andEnvironmental Design) Green BuildingRating SystemTM is a voluntary, consensus-based national standard for developing high-performance, sustainable buildings. LEED was created to:• define "green building" by establishing 

a common standard of measurement 

• promote integrated, whole-building 

design practices 

• recognize environmental leadership in 

the building industry 

• stimulate green competition • raise consumer awareness of green 

building benefits 

• transform the building market LEED provides a complete framework forassessing building performance andmeeting sustainability goals. LEEDrecognizes achievements and promotesexpertise in green building through acomprehensive system offering projectcertification, professional accreditation,training and practical resources. 
CE

 the Public Realm

 generous open space

uccess and livability of

s on the quality of open

assets into a sum that is

arts. Streets, as well as

mportant public spaces.

ortage of usable green

nd a poor distribution of

pproximately 20 acres of

dy area, or approximately

e and activity, Downtown

small amount of public

eeded to support residen

neighborhoods require a

om small pocket parks to

cessibility to parks is also

owntown are beyond a 5-

and public open spaces

strong connections. The

Downtown as its most

 it has the potential for

er success. 

STREETSDespite small areas of notable exception (such as LasOlas Boulevard), there are few attractive walkablestreets and pedestrian spaces in Downtown. The lackof landscaping and tree cover, width of streets, anddesign of sidewalks and building facades contribute tothis shortcoming (Fig. 3.42). Though walking distancesare often short, the urban environment makes walkingan undesirable option for moving around Downtown.Pockets of active street life include Las Olas Boulevard,Las Olas Downtown, Las Olas Riverfront, HimmarsheeVillage, and Stranahan Park. Some of these pockets ofstreet life operate successfully through much of the day,while others are much more specialized in their use andappeal. While close to each other, they tend to work asseparate and distinct places.Las Olas Boulevard is the most successful street in FortLauderdale, both for its retail/restaurant activity and forits pedestrian friendly streetscape. It is active at different times of the day and night, creating a 24/7 environment not achieved in other parts of Downtown. Thedesirable blending of human scale, landscape andactive street life should serve as a model for otherDowntown streets.
3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

3.21

OPEN SPACE

[Figure 3.44] Shaded circles indicate areas within a 5 minute walking distance of the parks.

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK BLVD

BROWARD BLVD

NEW RIVER

TARPON RIVER

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE

LAS OLAS BLVD

1/4 MILE RADIUS 5 MIN. WALK

RIVER

PON RIVER

D

Cooley Hammock

Park 

nia 

man

ng School 

oliday 

ark
rks and public spaces.

ga Park through a combination of

d programming. 

ased access and activity along the

t north of the library, such as the re

te an updated set of design guide

e RIverwalk. Include recommenda

floor uses, and amount of space

dy Park as a successful neighbor

bility of re-using the abandoned

nctions. (The potential loss of this

n the livability of this part of the city.

ational and open space needs of

ea, especially those within walking

al to its success.)

d “Art in Public Places” program to

ay and appreciation of art. This

n the success of Broward County’s

Encourage the creation of new parks and public spacesDowntown.Plan for any location within the study area to be within a 5-minutewalk of a quality public space.

:: ACTION

Encourage the creation of 6 new major parks and public spaces:1) Flagler Heights Community Park/ Plaza at the intersection of 

Sistrunk and 3rd Avenue

2) 'City Center' Community Park/ Plaza at SE 2nd Street.3) An expansion of the South Riverwalk between Andrews and 3rd

Avenue.

4) 'Gateway' landscape or public open space at the re-designed intersection of Federal highway and Sunrise Boulevard5) Require any future redevelopment of the south riverfront properties

between SW 4th Avenue and SW 1st Avenue to provide an expansion of the South Riverwalk.

6) Community Park located on the block currently occupied by the

city's 'One Stop Shop' building

:: ACTION

Encourage the introduction of a series of new, neighborhood, smallscale pocket parks, with a minimum distribution based on theFramework Diagram 3.48. Ideal sites would take advantage of pre-existing landscapes.

:: ACTION

Encourage the preparation of a Parks Master Plan for Downtown thatincludes recommendations for the location, design, and improvementsfor new and existing public parks and other spaces. Special focusshould be placed on urban park programming and standards, as wellas impact fee restructuring. 

g

o

a

l 2
3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

3.23

OPEN SPACE

RIVER

PON RIVER

D

 Park @Re- 

tersection

[Figure 3.50] A pocket park in Palm Beach.[Figure 3.49] ‘One-Stop Shop’ landscape.

[Figure 3.48] New neighborhood Pocket Parks.

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK BLVD

BROWARD BLVD

NEW RIVER

TARPON RIVER

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE

LAS OLAS BLVD

Min. 1 new Pocket Parkper dashed boundary

Min. 1 new Pocket Parkper dashed boundary

KEY

Existing, Improved &Proposed Parks & Plazas

Area Containing at Least1 New Pocket Park
n interconnected recreational

nd linear parks.

ler Greenway, stretching generally

north and south sides of the river.

 landscaped park would contain

ing to the more extensive Broward

e-development and the enhance

 the south side of the Tarpon River. 

ant public link between the eastern

as Olas Boulevard. This link occurs

site; whatever the final outcome of

s key connection in some form.

g

o

a

l 4

Encourage a network of ‘Green Streets’ throughout DowntownEncourage every Downtown street to be a ‘Green Street’, but placeextra emphasis on creating a primary network along the majorstreet connectors linking most of the significant public spaces.

::ACTION

Encourage the creation of a network of tree-lined streets, allowing greater walkability and contributing to the overall "greening" of downtown. Smallerstreets could be transformed with shade for pedestrians and bicycles,while larger streets could be transformed from barriers into urban boulevards.

::ACTION

Implement urban design street guidelines set forth in Chapter 4.
3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

3.25

OPEN SPACE

LAS OLAS B

RIVER

PON RIVER

er)

[Figure 3.56] A Coral Gables streetscape.[Figure 3.55] The Las Olas streetscape.

[Figure 3.54] New major 'Green Streets' network.

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK BLVD

BROWARD BLVD

LAS OLAS BL

NEW RIVER

TARPON RIVER

DAVIE BLVD

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE
T & ACCESS

ation to Multi-Modal Options

 to multiple destinations

key components for a

e elements that allow for

be considered simultane

ors. Roadway design and

relationship to the city’s

he city at several scales,

ual buildings.

ed upon their jurisdiction

 help determine roadway

he appropriation of funds.

he RAC are governed by

tate of Florida, Broward

auderdale. There are four

s within the RAC, Major (or

rials, Collectors and Local

achieve specific perform

 Minor Arterials typically

commuter traffic, while

 are designed to help the

to residential streets and

ach roadway classification

allow or limit traffic flow

e. 

Within and near the RAC, key roadways such as SunriseBoulevard, Broward Boulevard and US-1 are classifiedas State Principal Arterials and are designed to carryhigher volumes of traffic. Andrews Avenue, 3rd Avenueand Sistrunk Boulevard/NE 6th Street are classified asCounty Minor Arterials and are designed to carry lesstraffic volume than Principal Arterials, but are stilloriented toward moving traffic and less towards facilitating pedestrian activity. SW/SE 2nd Street, SW 6thStreet, E Las Olas Boulevard (portions of) are all examples of City Local Access streets that are designed tolimit traffic flow and allow more pedestrian activity.In general, roadway standards Downtown have evolvedto accommodate faster moving traffic at the expense ofa pedestrian-oriented streetscape. Lane width, curbradius, road design speed, and turning lane stackinglength requirements in an urban core area should haveless stringent requirements, and policy movement inthis direction is evident in the Florida Department ofTransportation’s ‘Plans Preparation Manual’ (in thechapter titled ‘Transportation Design for LivableCommunities’). This shift in design approach should beembraced and promoted to allow Downtown tobecome less dominated by traffic at the expense oflivability and attractiveness.
3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

3.27

MOVEMENT & ACCESS

Tarpon River Tarpon River

SE 11TH AVE SE 11TH AVE

H TER 

LAS OL

D

W RIVER
DRAFT

 transit modes and nodes

riders throughout South

 County Transit (BCT) bus

 Transit Management

ser, the Tri-Rail's Shuttle

 Water Bus Service and

wntown Transit Terminal,

and NW 1st Avenue. Each

as routes designed to inter

t the different services.

for many key destinations

ounty, there are significant

are lengthy; shuttle service

tinuous service; multiple

urisdictions, unclear transit

of user-friendliness. Public

Downtown transit should

 routes, shorter headway

plification of the existing

All transit initiatives should

echnologies, and accom

ns such as the ability to

ks.

[Figure 3.58] The Broward County Transit System Bus routes.

NW 1ST ST NW 1ST ST W 1ST STSW 2ND ST./ HIMMARSHEE ST. SW 2ND ST./ HIM ND ST / HIMMARSHEE ST. MARSHEE STSW 2ND CT SW2ND CT SW 4TH ST SW4TH ST SW 4TH CT SW4TH CT SW 4TH PL SW 4TH PL SW 4TH PLAS OLAS BLVD LAS OLAS BLVD OLAS BLVDSW 1ST ST SW 1ST ST 

NE 4TH ST NE4TH ST 

NE 3RD ST NE 3RD ST NE 3RD STNE 2ND ST NE 2ND ST NE 1ST ST NE1ST ST 

SE 2ND ST SE 2ND ST 

SE 4TH ST SE 4TH ST SE 4TH ST

SE 2ND CT SE 2ND CT 

SE 6TH ST SE 6TH ST

SE 5TH CT 

VISTA BLVD VISTA BLVD

NEWS NEW R I S NEW R IVER DR W R S

S RIO

SW 5 SW 6TH ST SW 6TH STSW 7TH ST SW 7TH ST SW 7TH ST

SW 8TH S SW 8TH STSW 9TH ST SW 9TH ST

CT

5TH PL

SE 6TH CT SE 6TH CT

SE 9TH ST SE 9TH ST

SE 10TH ST SE 10TH ST SW 10TH ST SW 10TH ST

SW 1 SW 1 

SE 7TH ST SE 7TH ST

SE 8TH ST SE 8TH ST

NE 5TH ST NE5TH ST NE 6TH ST NE 6TH ST 

NW 7TH ST NW 7TH ST 

NW 8TH ST NW 8TH ST NW 9TH ST 

Tarpon River Tarpon River

NW 7TH AVE

NW 6TH AVE NW 6TH AVE

NW 5TH AVE NW 5TH AVE

SE 8TH AVE SE 8TH AVE

SE 9TH AVE SE 9TH AVE

SE 10TH AVE SE 10TH AVE

SE 11TH AVE SE 11TH AVE

H TER 

SE 1ST AVE SE 1ST AVE SE 1ST

SE 4TH AVE SE 4TH AVE

SE 5TH AVE SE 5TH AVE

SE 5TH TER SE 5TH TER

T AVE

SW FLAGLER AVE SW FLAGLER A SW FLAGLER A

SW 1ST AVE SW 1ST AVE

VE

SW 6TH AVE SW 6TH AVE

SW 5TH AVE SW 5TH AVE

SW 3RD AVE SW 3RD AVE

2ND AVE 2ND AVE

FEDERAL HIGHWAY FEDERAL HIGHWAY

SW 4TH AVE SW 4TH AVE

NE 7TH AVE

NE 7TH AVE NE 7TH AVE

NE 8TH AVE NE 8TH AVE

NE 8TH AVE NE 8TH AVE

FLAGLER AVE FLAGLER AVE

NE 1ST AVE NE 1ST AVE

NE 2ND AVE NE 2ND AVE

NE 4TH AVE NE 4TH AVE

NE 5TH AVE NE 5TH AVE

NE 5TH TER NE 5TH TER

NE 9TH AVE NE 9TH AVE

AGLER AVE

VE

SE 3RD AVE SE 3RD AVE

FLAGLER DRIVE ER

SISTRUNK BLVD SISTRUNK BLVD NK BLVD

BROWARD BLVD BROWARD BLV D

LAS OL

84

84

1

40

22 81

11

50

20

10

55

40

14

31

60

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK BLVD

BROWARD BLVD

NEW RIVER

DAVIE BLVD

3RD AVE

FEDERAL HWY

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE
3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

3.29

MOVEMENT & ACCESS

[Figure 3.60] Tri-Rail Shuttle Bus System.

NW 1ST ST NW 1ST ST W 1ST STSW 2ND ST./ HIMMARSHEE ST. SW 2ND ST./ HIM ND ST / HIMMARSHEE ST. MARSHEE STSW 2ND CT SW2ND CT SW 4TH ST SW4TH ST SW 4TH CT SW4TH CT SW 4TH PL SW 4TH PL SW 4TH PLAS OLAS BLVD LAS OLAS BLVD OLAS BLVDSW 1ST ST SW 1ST ST 

NE 4TH ST NE4TH ST 

NE 3RD ST NE 3RD ST NE 3RD STNE 2ND ST NE 2ND ST NE 1ST ST NE1ST ST 

SE 2ND ST SE 2ND ST 

SE 4TH ST SE 4TH ST SE 4TH ST

SE 2ND CT SE 2ND CT 

SE 6TH ST SE 6TH ST

SE 5TH CT 

VISTA BLVD VISTA B S RIO BLVD

SW 5 SW 6TH ST SW 6TH STSW 7TH ST SW 7TH ST SW 7TH ST

SW 8TH S SW 8TH STSW 9TH ST SW 9TH ST

CT

5TH PL

SE 6TH CT SE 6TH CT

SE 9TH ST SE 9TH ST

SE 10TH ST SE 10TH ST SW 10TH ST SW 10TH ST

SW 1 SW 1 

SE 7TH ST SE 7TH ST

SE 8TH ST SE 8TH ST

NE 5TH ST NE5TH ST NE 6TH ST NE 6TH ST 

NW 7TH ST NW 7TH ST 

NW 8TH ST NW 8TH ST NW 9TH ST 

Tarpon River Tarpon River

NW 7TH AVE

NW 6TH AVE NW 6TH AVE

NW 5TH AVE NW 5TH AVE

SE 8TH AVE SE 8TH AVE

SE 9TH AVE SE 9TH AVE

SE 10TH AVE SE 10TH AVE

SE 11TH AVE SE 11TH AVE

H TER 

SE 1ST AVE SE 1ST AVE SE 1ST

SE 4TH AVE SE 4TH AVE

SE 5TH AVE SE 5TH AVE

SE 5TH TER SE 5TH TER

T AVE

SW FLAGLER AVE SW FLAGLER A SW FLAGLER A

SW 1ST AVE SW 1ST AVE

VE

SW 6TH AVE SW 6TH AVE

SW 5TH AVE SW 5TH AVE

SW 3RD AVE SW 3RD AVE

2ND AVE 2ND AVE

FEDERAL HIGHWAY FEDERAL HIGHWAY

SW 4TH AVE SW 4TH AVE

NE 7TH AVE

NE 7TH AVE NE 7TH AVE

NE 8TH AVE NE 8TH AVE

NE 8TH AVE NE 8TH AVE

NE 1ST AVE NE 1ST AVE

NE 2ND AVE NE 2ND AVE

NE 4TH AVE NE 4TH AVE

NE 5TH AVE NE 5TH AVE

NE 5TH TER NE 5TH TER

NE 9TH AVE NE 9TH AVE

VE

SE 3RD AVE SE 3RD AVE

LAGLER DRIVE ER

SISTRUNK BLV SISTRUNK BLV

LAS OL To Gat Ocean Mile via A1A

To Ft. Lauderdale

Tri-Rail Station

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK BLVD

BROWARD BLVD

NEW RIVER

DAVIE BLVD

3RD AVE

FEDERAL HWY

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE

Tarpon River Tarpon River

SE 11TH AVE SE 11TH AVE

H TER 

LAS OL

D

W RIVER

VD

RAC TRANSIT MODESBusCurrently, there are fifteen BCT busroutes that serve the RAC. Thesefifteen routes carry approximately 50percent (14 million per year) of thetotal BCT system riders and 20 percentof the daily riders either begin or endtheir trip within the RAC. Thefrequency of service ranges from 15 to40 minute headways on weekdays,and 30 to 60 minute headways onweekends.Water BusWater Taxi Inc. provides a Water Busservice that runs along the New Riverconnecting key waterfront destinationson the New River and intracoastalwaterway to various BCT bus routes,Tri-Rail Shuttle routes and to the TMA'sCity Cruiser.ShuttleThe TMA provides a local circulatorsystem, the City Cruiser, whichconnects the employment core withbeach destinations and neighborhoods to the northwest and northeast.Tri-Rail provides a shuttle service thatconnects its regional rail facility to thekey nodes within RAC, includingBroward County's Central DowntownTransit Terminal and Fort Lauderdale'sCity Cruiser Service. Tri-Rail has oneweekday route that services the RACand the Tri-Rail Station.
nd mass transit depends,

ality of the overall street

cessful urban centers rely

ure with reasonably-sized

t grids provide abundant

s for developments of

undant options for pedes

Most importantly, an un

es public access to the

ns and areas.le, a gradual pattern of

and alleys has occurred

nded to reduce traffic in

‘redundancy’ in the grid

e traffic congestion on

of a fine grain of walkable

development parcels also

d creates a less pedes

[Figure 3.62] Diagram showing existing instances of vacated streets and alleys, and blocked

streets. The trend should be discouraged in the future.

KEYBlocked streetsVacated streetsVacated alleys
3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

3.31

MOVEMENT & ACCESS

Respect the publicly owned street grid and alley system.As the steward of Downtown public space, the City should weigh theoverall public good (for traffic circulation, transit, pedestrians,bicycles, view corridors, light and air) against initiatives to decreasepublically owned land. Land removed from public ownership, oftenin incremental, seemingly insubstantial steps, can add up to a longterm weakening of the public realm with significant implications(such as increased traffic congestion concentrated on fewer streets). 

:: ACTION

Discourage the practice of vacating city streets and alleys (except in thestrategic locations mentioned later in “Goal 2”). Maintain all remainingalleys where possible and encourage building types which take advantageof the alleys.

:: ACTION

Encourage the re-opening of street blockages that have been used fortraffic reduction or security reasons. Utilize other, more appropriate, trafficcalming devices advocated in this framework, such as: mini-roundabouts,decreased lane widths, on-street parallel parking, etc., while maintainingtraffic flow. Other, more appropriate security measures include: buildingand multiple entries fronting streets, neighborhood retail/ corner stores,pedestrian street lighting, vibrant commercial streets, etc.

[Figure 3.63] A traffic calming device used in

nearby Delray Beach”: the mini-roundabout.

goal 1
s to the street grid.

gn of the Federal Highway/ Sunrise

ge the creation of a significant

e new development opportunities.

oundabout, would allow a constant

of a large public space which could

r a monument. Other solutions are

g a significant, memorable public

ged.

constrained and under-developed

al Highway between NE 4th Street

depth and development potential.

eys 1⁄2 block to the west. 

constrained and under-developed

Highway between NE 4th Street and

h and development potential. This

certain alleys in blocks to the north

between Federal Highway and the

e of unusually narrow blocks that

y-scaled development. 

ts between NE 2nd Street and NE

NE 5th Avenue. This would create

rease connectivity between Flagler

New TrafficCircle @ Sunrise'Gateway'

New Streets

@ Federal Hwy Corridor

New Alleys @ Federal Hwy Corridor

Vacated Alleys @ Federal Hwy Corridor

Vacated Alleys @ Las Olas

Peninsula

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK BLVD

BROWARD BLVD

LAS OLAS BL

NEW RIVER

TARPON RIVER

DAVIE BLVD

ANDREWS AVE

3RD AVE

FEDERAL HWY

FEC RAIL LINE

[Figure 3.65] New and altered streets and the resulting improved development parcels.

KEYProposed vacated streetsProposed streetsConsolidated parcels
3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

3.33

MOVEMENT & ACCESS

ve bicycle

onal users.

osals for a

eet trail and

diagram for

trian-friendly

own at key

ge for both

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK BLVD

BROWARD BLVD

LAS OLAS BLV

NEW RIVER

TARPON RIVER

DAVIE BLVD

ANDREWS AVE

3RD AVE

FEDERAL HWY

FEC RAIL LINE

On-StreetBike LaneNetwork

Flagler Greenway Off-StreetBike Trail

South RiverwalkOff-StreetBike Trail

Tarpon RiverOff-StreetBike Trail

[Figure 3.67] On and off-street bicycle

paths will create a downtown network.

[Figure 3.66] Existing and proposed bike trail network.
it system.

, connecting both sides of the river

ulator (red loop), connecting the

e core.

 changing demands in routing and

oop” may run back and forth along

, and cross the river for the south

The “red loop” may be extended

rds the Hospital District.

st green technologies for transit

 they must be capable of crossing

 FEC railroad tracks. 

ated 'image' for the new transit

icle design, clear graphics, transit

including stops, signage, lighting,

dscaping, should be integrated with

eet design principles in Chapter 4.

monstration Project" (along the Las

e realization of the transit system

ccordance with the broader transit

iece of the Downtown Circulator. 

ty Study and determine applicable

mplementation that are consistent

Optional 'Red Loop' Extension

'Hospital District'Extension

'Sistrunk Connector'

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK BLVD

BROWARD BLVD

LAS OLAS BLVD

NEW RIVER

TARPON RIVER

DAVIE BLVD

ANDREWS AVE

3RD AVE

FEDERAL HWY

FEC RAIL LINE

To Beach

'Red Loop'

To Tri-Rail

'Blue Loop'

[Figure 3.69] 2 overlapping transit loops, with flexible routing. 
3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

3.35

MOVEMENT & ACCESS

'Sistrunk Connector'

FEC Passenger Rail Service

DirectConnectionto Airport

Multi-Modal

Transportation Hub

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK BLVD

BROWARD BLVD

LAS OLAS B

NEW RIVER

TARPON RIVER

DAVIE BLVD

ANDREWS AVE

3RD AVE

FEDERAL HWY

FEC RAIL LINE

[Figure 3.70] A multi-modal transportation hub can be located at the intersection of two transit

loops and the future FEC passenger rail station; Connections to the water bus system shouldalso be accommodated. 

agler Rail

the historic

e potential

port such a

Downtown. 

 rail passen

es into one,
 & BUILDING TYPES

ive mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly neighborhoods

gnation for the Downtown

ized as "mixed-use", to

ent with a specific amount

pment. However, the true

ckets of "single-use" activ

 primarily residential uses

AC land-use designation

pment of property in the

g regulations.

ZONINGCurrent zoning regulations were established in 1997 toregulate uses and development in the RAC. The "CityCenter" District allows a great deal of development flexibility compared to most downtown areas in the U.S. andSouth Florida. A parking exemption allows some flexibility and, as the Downtown becomes more walkable, itwill allow for a gradual reduction of parking ratios,reducing the already severe impacts of parking ondevelopment sites. (In many cities, the preponderanceof unsightly parking garages results from stringentparking requirements for each new project.) Theunspecified height limit in the "City Center" Districtreflects a market driven approach to building form.Surrounding zoning districts (within the RAC) havevarying height limits and other zoning controls. In general, existing zoning regulations exhibit the following characteristics:

Reactive: avoids conflicts with surroundingneighborhoods Affects only individual properties: does notinclude public realmNot design based: offers no guidance for designNegative: only says what you can't do
[Figure 3.72] Zoning designations and boundaries.

3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

3.37

LAND USE & BUILDING TYPES

Arts &ScienceDistrict

City

Historic Center

Preservation

District

West

Transitional

Mixed-Use

District

South

Transitional

Mixed-Use

District

East TransitionalMixed-UseDistrict

Residential and ProfessionalOffice District

Urban

Village

District

se Regional

RAC ZONING DISTRICTS

City Center (CC):

Unspecified heightUnspecified density Highly flexible zoning

Urban Village (UV):

Max height 55’, up to 150’ with 

conditional use permit

Unspecified density

Residential Professional Office (RPO):

Max height 55’, up to 150’ with 

conditional use permit

50 DU/Acre max.

"Transition" Districts(EMU, WMU, SMU)

“Neighborhood Compatibility”25 DU/Acre max.

Arts and Sciences District (RAC-AS)

“Neighborhood Compatibility”35 DU/Acre max.
nations of official zoning

o have a clear thematic,

wn area. This view reveals

locations and boundaries

s around the city. Certain

ry clear identities, while

 all. Transitions between

ral edges or boundaries

changes in existing land

c street grid.

The pattern of historic street grids has a particularlystrong impact on the perception of Downtown’s neighborhoods:The different block sizes and grid types create specialconditions where different grids collide. This often hasthe effect of creating noticeable transitions from onearea to another. For example, there is a clear shift inscale and perception of place when passing across NE4th Street from the Flagler Heights grid to the historicdowntown grid.Different block types (varying dimensions, lot sizes,alleys, etc.) are better suited for different types of development. For example, the block type in the FlaglerHeight area (with alleys) are particularly well suited forcertain residential building typologies that take advantage of alleys (eg, rear out-buildings/ garage apartments, etc.) and parking solutions (eg, interior blockparking).

 TYPES

NTITY STREET PATTERNS
3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

3.39

LAND USE & BUILDING TYPES

[Figure 3.74] The overall block structure divided into its various adjacent street grid systems.

Historic

Downtown

FlaglerHeightsGrid

Rio Vista SE 7th St.

NE 4th St.

New River

Las Olas Blvd.

Broward Blvd.

FEC Rail Line

Andrews Ave.

3rd Ave.

Federal Hwy

VictoriaPark

Progresso

Regal Trace/City View

Holiday Park

s

a

toria

Park

Beverly

Heights/

Colee

Hammock

liday

Park

dge

on. 
ange dramatically in scale

 single-story/ low density. 

ildings are located 

cated primarily along 

 located primarily in 

rridors

ty Center, large areas of

utilized, with vacant land

se areas represent a vast

velopment of housing and

he city center. 

ell-defined and attractive

 new projects have devel

e" characteristics. These

arily by car, and do not

des or active uses facing

ce is provided on rooftops

This self-reinforcing trend

g environment of inactive

streets, even in the center of town, discouraging pedestrian-friendly developments. As a result, each projectacts as an island, rather than contributing to thecreation of strong neighborhoods and active, walkablestreets.A combination of market factors and a high water tablehas created a pattern of very large above-groundparking structures in Downtown. When tied to thedevelopment of buildings, garages can weaken therelationship to street level pedestrian spaces. Thesestructures dominate many views of Downtown, and canhave a negative impact on pedestrian street activityand sense of safety.In many cases, insufficient attention has been paid totransitions in scale and interface between very largenew structures and the legacy of smaller buildings inDowntown. An overall vision for Downtown can createa framework for better relationships among separatedevelopment projects. Large buildings can be successfully integrated in historic urban cores, by careful attention to massing and active ground floor uses.

 TYPES

DING TYPES
3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

3.41

LAND USE & BUILDING TYPES

[Figure 3.75] Diagram showing the distribution of small to extra-large building types in the RAC.

[Figure 3.77] Mid-scale buildings located in

north-south corridors.

[Figure 3.76] Concentration of large buildings in the core area.[Figure 3.78] Very low intensity of development in pockets north and south of the

New River.

KEY

Extra Large-Scale Buildings

Large-Scale BuildingsMid-Scale Buildings

Small-Scale Buildings
ent, with an emphasis on

al, commercial, retail, cultural,

active streets and 24/7 commu

d be characterized not only as

ct, block, or development, but

 building.

opment. 

r a variety of office types and

ce space will attract different

e the likelihood of economic

ge and floorplate offerings for differ

sses, as foreseen in current market

singly popular urban housing/office

Encourage a variety of housing options Downtown. Encourage a variety of housing types and affordability levels tomake Downtown more inclusive. Housing opportunities shouldexist for multiple family types and multiple incomes, with increasedattention given to workforce housing.

:: ACTION

Encourage the preparation of a Downtown Housing Study that willidentify housing conditions, needs, and strategies.

:: ACTION

Encourage planning initiatives that define goals for multiple housingopportunities and a strategy for achieving the goals.

:: ACTION

Encourage the inclusion of workforce housing in market-rate developments. Workforce housing should be located within the same buildingsas market-rate housing, not in separate buildings of lower quality.

:: ACTION

Encourage concurrent planning and development of schools, parks,utilities and other public amenities necessitated by an increasedresidential population.

:: ACTION

Encourage a mixture of housing types and scales, ranging from highrise condos to townhomes.

 TYPES

g

o

a

l 3
3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

3.43

LAND USE & BUILDING TYPES

espond to

m regional

dents and

 requiring it

and occurs.

n those key

future retail

nitial recom

wth projec

ric through

ary streets;

etback line;

s accessed

ys.

arking lots.

rner stores,

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK BLVD

BROWARD BLVD

AS OLAS B

NEW RIVER

TARPON RIVER

LV

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE

D

EDERAL HWY EDERAL HWY EDERAL HWY

D

E

[Figure 3.81] Focused areas of ground floor retail and retail districts in key Downtown

locations.

KEY

Ground Floor (storefront)Retail

Potential Areas forLarger-Scale Retail
 TYPES

[Figure 3.82] Three different character areas, whose characteristics are defined in the Design

Guidelines chapters shown overlaid over existing zoning boundaries.

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK BLVD

BROWARD BLVD

SW 7TH ST

NW 4TH ST

SW 9TH ST

LAS OLAS B

NEW RIVER

TARPON RIVER

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE

RAC-UV

RAC-CC

RACEMU

RS-8

H-1

RAC-RPO

RACSMU

RACAS

RAC-WMU

H-1

B-3

B-1

B-1

RMM-25

RML-25 CB CB P RMM-25 RS-8 B-1 B-1 RMM-25 RS-8 RS-8 CF- HS CB ROA CB ROC RD-15

U

ROC

B 3 CB

RM15

RMM25

RMM25

RO

RC-15

RMM-25

RMM-25

CF-HS

CB

B-2

B-3

I

P

RMH-25

B2 CB

B-3

B-1

RMM25

RML25

P

RM-15

KEY

Downtown Core

Near Downtown

ct quality Urban Neighborhood

nct quality, creating a hierarchy

y and character of areas within

g a pedestrian 'sense of place'

n RAC depends on the devel

 with its own character and

reas' are determined based on

development patterns, bound

reinforce and strengthen exist

erns. The Framework diagram

 areas. Each exhibits unique

paces while sharing common

ed design. While all three are

inguished by varying building

mercial uses.

orts the following general descrip

e "center," including the greatest

mercial and civic uses, combined

iate-scale mixed residential area,

using, with some office and service

act urban form with a strong neigh

with some service commercial and

bed in Chapter 4.
3

framework

LAND USE & BUILDING TYPES FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

rent Character areas (not taking into account actual, site-specific locations or new/ proposed green spaces.

tional, retail, and office

housing variety

Primarily residentialCommunity retail & employment

R DOWNTOWN URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD Refer to Chapter 4 for more detailed design guidelines for Character Areas

3.45
 TYPES

Reduce the negative impacts of parking garages.

:: ACTION

Maximize on-street parallel parking throughout the RAC.

:: ACTION

Encourage parking garages that do the following:

• disguise or conceal the parking use • activate the ground floor with pedestrian friendly uses• locate the parking internally to buildings with discrete entrances

These can be achieved by implementing the Design Guidelinesdescribed in Chapter 4.

goal 7

al Use Districts.

reas of particular interest and

hile still maintaining a healthy

F.A.T. Village (Flagler Arts and

e special district with a significant

distinctive architectural character

ehouse architecture. The Design

 in terms of scale, use, and re

he Arts and Entertainment District

g Arts Center and the Museum of

d sites currently exist in the area.

me History would complement the

t ongoing efforts to create an

d the existing FAU/BCC campus,

oximity of the Museum of Art and

e elements, improved destination

ovative ground-floor programming

town institutional base.

he Courts District south of the New

ourthouse and Family Courthouse

sites and benefit from the proximity
3

framework

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

3.47

LAND USE & BUILDING TYPES

[Figure 3.86] Potential future landmarks have the potential to transform the face of Downtown

with a new generation of architectural excellence. 

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK BLVD

BROWARD BLVD

LAS OLAS B

NEW RIVER

TARPON RIVER

DAVIE BLVD

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE Southside School:

Possible new

school or civic/

community function

Andrews 

'Gateway' Bridge to Downtown

Maritime

Museum

Arts District

Gateway

Multimodal

Transportation Hub

Sunrise/ FederalGateway: public art/ landscape w/ possible civic use

Sistrunk Blvd.

Gateway

PotentialFederal CourthouseDowntown Gateway from Airport/ South

New Pedestriancrossing/ River Landmark

Creative Re-useof Existing Court Building: Possible new school, museum

or civic useCounty Gov't. Building (part of Downtown Campus)New City Hall

[Figure 3.87] Recent examples of landmark

civic projects that utilize quality design totransform the image of a city.Carre d’Art in Nimes, FranceMuseum of Art in Milwaukee, WisconsinPedestrian Bridge in Bilbao, SpainFederal Courthouse in Las Vegas, Nevada

rks for the

ity for the

w years.

architectural

nternational

nce, public

 retain and

 strengthen

center.

se which is

disruption to

Campus to

Downtown.

mark signif

s a loosely

The arrival

dy provides

streetscape,

ding edges.

 public art,

lic spaces.

DESIGN GUIDELINES

4

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

revised chapter

May 2007 UPDATE
e 3 years after the Master Plan

Consolidated Downtown

e Downtown" was devel

cent rapid growth in the

o transform the downtown

n center with strong and

urban fabric of walkable,

ed multi-modal circulation

paces; high quality build

o provide light and air at

xceptional urban environ

e goal of maintaining the

design solutions.

 and framework identified

gn guidelines defined in

, were developed to pro

 achieve the intent of the

ementation in 2003, there

outcomes. City agencies

Master Plan's goals pro

ct-approvals process, and

ch as the refinement of

cent generation of private

brace the spirit of the

 desire to create a great

Downtown environment.Looking closely at the successes and shortcomings ofthe 2003 Master Plan, we learned that some guidelineswere effective in implementing the intent of the MasterPlan; that some turned out partially effective and inneed of future refinement; and that elements of theFramework Plan required more specific guidelines to befully implemented. This 2006 Design Guideline Updateplaces a greater focus on: more specific recommendations for achieving high quality architecture and improving building scale and massing; more careful attentionto the public realm including building/street relationships and design of the streetscape; and better strategies to resolve parking and other negative impacts. Inaddition, specific areas of the Downtown, calledThematic Planning Districts have been identified for further analysis in order to enhance and preserve theirunique characteristics.With the evolution of these guidelines, the vision of theMaster Plan will become more readily achievable andDowntown Fort Lauderdale will become an even betterplace to live, work and play.

ADDED MAY 2007
4

design guidelines

TS FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

4.4

4.5

4.20

4.36

4.61

4.69

4.76

4.86

4.88

4.90

4.96

4.3
orm the image of a city.

stions applied throughout

hieve a number of the

als, especially those relat

nes are not meant to be

nd reflective of a design

ow flexibility to create the

ent.

this Update combine the

ter 4 of the original 2003

f new and revised guide

th a note at each new or

ant to illustrate and clarify

atment of the following key

eets

 bicycle and vehicular facil

 planting

ng to its neighbors, streets,

buildings, both on the street

ilding facades, with a par

r activity.

f pedestrian and vehicle

vice.

The guidelines are broken down into ten sections:

1 Principles of Street Design2 Street Design Examples3 Principles of Building Design4 Quality of Architecture5 Principles of Storefront Design6 Character Area Guidelines7 Neighborhood Transition Areas8 Thematic Planning Districts9 Principles of Riverfront Design10 Implementation

UIDELINES

REVISED MAY 2007
4.5

[Figure 4.04] Example of street grid and

view corridor blocked by new building overvacated street; a public good sacrificed toprivate development.

[Figure 4.05] Continuous streets and shorter blocks create pedestrian connectivity.

cated City

purposes. 

Framework

ely neces

ls. (The

y and Las

treet alter

grid is ben

f buildable

street frontages and public access, and the increased distribution oftraffic flows.Avoid further alley closings, except when absolutely necessary toimprove prohibitively difficult-to-build parcels. Alleys are beneficialin the creation of a particular block type that is well suited for residential uses. Parking directly off of the alley can serve residentialbuildings that line the streets. Alleys can also provide access toentrances into parking structures and accommodate service needs.

STREET DESIGN

[Figure 4.02] ENCOURAGED [Figure 4.03 ]

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown
 barricading streets. 

ng street closures; discourage

 of street closures, a variety of

d be utilized to inhibit through

e devices are illustrated in this

eighborhood streets in Flagler

-roundabout’. The roundabout

 Example 1: Bulb-outs and ‘speed table’ ENCOURAGED [Figure 4.09] Example 2: Mini-roundabout

LOCAL STREET

LOCAL STREET LOCAL STREET

ON-STREET PKGSPEED TABLEBULB-OUT

ON-STREET PKG

MINI-ROUNDABOUT

BULB-OUT

slows traffic and adds a distinct urban identity with landscape elements at intersections.Another traffic calming technique is the ‘speed table’, which is anelevated portion of the roadway that encourages cars to slowdown and creates a more seamless pedestrian crossing.On-street parking, practical for a number of reasons, also servesas an effective traffic-calming device.

T DESIGN
4.7

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

ENCOURAGED

ts except

portant for

d for more

structured

providing a

ntributes to

estrians at

various points along the streets who then walk to nearby destinations. It can provide a significant revenue source for the city thatcould contribute to the costs of an improved public realm.

[Figure 4.10] [Figure 4.11]

PRINCIPLES OF STREET DESIGN

[Figure 4.12] A lack of on-street parking on

major streets Downtown.

[Figure 4.13] On-street parking in San

Diego, CA on an arterial street.
T DESIGN

planned network.

e lanes is critical to make

nes need to be properly sized

 desirable biking environment,

street parking: a = 5 feet

on-street parking: a = 4 feet

AFTER

CODE ISSUECoordinate with County Bikeways Plan

[Figure 4.16] [Figure 4.17]
4.9

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown PRINCIPLES OF STREET DESIGN

etwork in a

oordinated

, flowering,

et tree des

er Heights)

 Important

nopy, side

most impor

However, these factors should not be used to avoid providing streettrees. Coordinated design of tree planting, sidewalks and underground utilities is essential.b) Street trees should continue as close to intersection corners aspossible, which will require reconsideration of driver sightline requirements. These are currently not compatible with Downtown urbandesign objectives.

[Figure 4.18]

CODE ISSUERequires re-evaluation of local corner sight triangle regulations.
T DESIGN

row of street trees between

n the sidewalk and automobile

ological buffer that encourages

ng the sidewalk (with buildings

n provide consistent shade for

rable to palms where pedestri

reduce the visual width of the

th shade and palm trees can

Trees located directly adjacent to buildings are discouraged; theyprovide little shade, have limited size and growth potential, and aremostly limited to palms.

ENCOURAGED

[Figure 4.21] [Figure 4.22]

CODE ISSUE1) Need new City of FL code requirement2) Requires re-evaluation of FDOT 

Horizontal Clearance regulations.
[Figure 4.28] Shade trees closely spaced in

Fort Lauderdale creating shade anddefined street-edge 4.11

PRINCIPLES OF STREET DESIGN

of 30’ apart

ell-defined

[Figure 4.23]

ENCOURAGED

[Figure 4.25] Palm trees spaced too far apart

in Fort Lauderdale

[Figure 4.26] Palm trees effectively spaced

in Hollywood

[Figure 4.27] Shade trees spaced too far apart

in Fort Lauderdale

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

CODE ISSUE1) City of FL, Code of Ordinances & 

ULDR, Sec 4-7 13.20, Tree Spacing

2) Requires re-evaluation of ‘Pedestrian

Priority Street’ guidelines regulating treespacing.

[Figure 4.24]
T DESIGN

 trees.

um canopy clearance (face of

shade trees, and a minimum of

an current code requirements,

 of eliminating trees altogether.

CODE ISSUEFDOT Plans Preparation manual - DesignCriteria & Process, Horizontal clearances

[Figure 4.29]

ance shown from curb

criptions. See App. D)

Median condition for palm trees Shoulder condition for palm trees
4.13

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

s to mark

encourage

marker.

ome areas,

m the per

e added to

[Figure 4.31] Two Delray Beach examples of palm trees at intersections

[Figure 4.30]

CODE ISSUECity of FL, Code of Ordinances & ULDR, Sec4-7 19.5, sight triangle requirements

PRINCIPLES OF STREET DESIGN
T DESIGN

requirement.

y current County corner chord

building setbacks at every

or suburban conditions and is

 (where the option for corners

ighly desirable). The Corner

d corners, where ground floor

The necessary utility infrastructure can be located underground,within an adjacent building (with external access), or at the base ortop of signal posts. These methods are common in many cities.

[Figure 4.32] AFTER [Figure 4.33]

CODE ISSUEDevelop new County Utility Easementrequirement for urban areas
4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

4.15

tions to a

mum of 20

omplishes

 for pedes

motorists to

r pedestri

[Figure 4.34] AFTER [Figure 4.35]

PRINCIPLES OF STREET DESIGN

[Figure 4.36] A large curb radius causes

longer, less safe pedestrian crossing distances

[Figure 4.37] A small curb radius in Palm

Beach

CODE ISSUEAlter Florida Building Code requirement forurban conditions
T DESIGN

urb cuts on “Primary” streets.

ble, they are generally discour

possible, curb cuts leading to

ve-through services should be

ndary streets (streets which are

trian-oriented activity).

Multiple access points serving the same development should alsobe consolidated into the fewest number of curb cuts as possible,and the width and number of lanes of curb cuts should be minimized.

[Figure 4.40] ENCOURAGED [Figure 4.41]

PRIMARY STREET PRIMARY STREET

CODE ISSUEAdd Design Code requirement for the location and consolidation of curb cuts.
4.17

4

design guidelines

PRINCIPLES FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown OF STREET DESIGN

ds of cars,

lanes and

 standards

anes within

sive high

d bicycles

ossing dis

 within the

[Figure 4.42]

A CURB

B TRAVEL LANEC TURN LANEA CURBB TRAVEL LANEC TURN LANEA CURBB TRAVEL LANEC TURN LANE

2’

11’ to 12’10’ to 12’

2’

11’

10’ to 11’

2’

10’ to 11’10’ to 11’

1’-6”

11’10’

1’-6”

10’-6”

10’

1’-6”

10’10’

COLLECTORS

EXISTING PROPOSED

ARTERIALS

EXISTING PROPOSED

LOCAL

EXISTING PROPOSED

CODE ISSUE1) FDOT Plans Preparation Manual - 

Design Criteria & Process, lane widths

2) FDOT Greenbook, lane widths3) TDLC as possible reference
Encourage reduced design speeds on all RAC streets.

Traffic speed plays an essential role in any successful pedestrianoriented environment. Since people tend to drive at speeds thatfeel safe on a given road, the actual design of the road plays justas important a role as the posted speed limits in determining thespeed of traffic flow. There are very few examples of successfulpedestrian streets that accommodate high-speed traffic flow.Slowed or ‘calmed’ automobile traffic is a key component to acomfortable pedestrian friendly streetscape. While the traffic maymove more slowly, overall volumes and travel times can be minimized by maintaining the integrity of the street grid, and throughthe use of signal timing and other traffic calming devices that donot disrupt flow (such as mini-roundabouts at residential localintersections.)Decreased design speeds allow the reduction of roadway andintersection dimensions, balancing traffic design with pedestrianneeds. Design speed Downtown should range from 15 - 40 mphdepending on the street type.

[Figure 4.45]

T DESIGN

nd setbacks for all Downtown

uncoordinated and conflicting

nt requirements).

ngle urban design elements that

blic realm. Currently, overlapping

ments initiated by different agen

ect which often undermines each

ncreased jurisdictional coopera

ntext of future ‘precinct planning’

fixed dimensions for Downtown

S-1

5

CODE ISSUE1) County Trafficways plan2) Need for institutional coordination of 

Downtown R.O.W.
4.19

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown PRINCIPLES OF STREET DESIGN

MAY 2007
 BOULEVARD Street Design Example

ic boulevard”

own’s most challenging physi

ent streetscape improvements,

a successful balance between

endliness. Intersections, bur

ple turning lanes, are wide and

ridor lacks strong visual defini

g and building form. Broward

city and fastest-moving streets;

eet parking, and suggests that

s unlikely in the near future.

d on: strong and continuous

, improved north-south pedes

ovements of the east-west trav

ramatically landscaped, urban

mensions by relocating existing

opriate streets, and replacing

er pedestrian sidewalk activity.

ew, primary row of palm trees

but inconsistent, rows of street

lms) set back further from the

 Create a significant, raised, planting bed along the center

median that contains low plantings and palm trees. This creates a visual ‘narrowing’ of the Boulevard, and provides generous and safe mid-point islands for pedestrian crossings. Themedian should extend to intersections, without the interruptionof turn lanes, for pedestrian safety.

 Introduce pedestrian crossings at key mid-block locations, taking advantage of enlarged medians where possible. This

addresses the unusual condition of extra-long blocks onBroward, and will require push-button triggered signalization.

BEFORE

[Figure 4.48]
4.21

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRU

BROW

NEW

TAR

DAVIE BLVD

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE

[Figure 4.49] [Figure 4.50] Key map

BROWARD BOULEVARD Street Design Example

NOTE ON STREET DESIGN EXAMPLES:The street design examples illustrate principles and guidelines, and do not representfully engineered solutions. Other alternatives are acceptable, as long as they satisfythe fundamental urban design principles ofthe Master Plan. The City has the flexibilityto work with the Master Plan street designrecommendations to make them compatiblewith changing or unforeseen conditions,and ongoing studies. 
HIGHWAY Street Design Example

teway boulevard”

gh-capacity traffic corridor that

as a primary automobile entry

south, it should be an elegant,

rrently, inconsistent landscap

ses, and excessively long turn

aped medians) contribute to a

 pedestrian safety, unfitting for

roward Boulevard, pedestrian

he east-west direction), and the

me a well-defined, landscaped

quality of Broward Boulevard’s

ghway can provide a dramatic

of shade and palm trees. It can

 anticipating the future redevel

d sites. This can be accom

acity. 

with palm trees. Turn lanes

inimum possible lengths, max

n. A pedestrian path running

ped median may be desirable

s on the median at each inter

 Create a continuous, planting strip along the sides of Federal

Highway, to buffer the sidewalks from traffic with a variety ofplantings and a primary row of shade trees. 

 Encourage all future redevelopment along Federal Highway to

follow a consistent build-to line (as shown on following pages)and contribute to a more vibrant streetscape.

BEFORE [Figure 4.51] 
4.23

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRU

BROW

NEW

TAR

DAVIE BLVD

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE

[Figure 4.52] [Figure 4.53] Key map

FEDERAL HIGHWAY Street Design Example

REVISED MAY 2007
reet Design Example

T

[Figure 4.54]
4.25

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRU

BROW

NEW

TAR

DAVIE BLVD

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE

[Figure 4.56] Key map

[Figure 4.55]

FEDERAL HIGHWAY Street Design Example

REVISED MAY 2007

NOTE ON STREET DESIGN EXAMPLES:The street design examples illustrate principles and guidelines, and do not representfully engineered solutions. Other alternatives are acceptable, as long as they satisfythe fundamental urban design principles ofthe Master Plan. The City has the flexibilityto work with the Master Plan street designrecommendations to make them compatiblewith changing or unforeseen conditions,and ongoing studies. 
UE Street Design Example

rant, active spine”

e a vibrant pedestrian-friendly

own, passing through all three

ignificant public spaces, such

ommunity Park. The existing

ommodate a much more inter

with wider sidewalks, on-street

nt shade trees. 3rd Avenue

 other ground-floor activity.

room for expanded sidewalks

g both sides of the street, with

o the sidewalk, decreasing the

es between the parking and

s with tall palm trees to create

m along the street.

uses, especially at key public

ints

ess absolutely unavoidable.

hicular site access should be

ever possible.

BEFORE [Figure 4.57]

REVISED MAY 2007
4.27

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRU

BROW

NEW

TAR

DAVIE BLVD

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE

[Figure 4.58] [Figure 4.59] Key map

3RD AVENUE Street Design Example
esign Example

DER

LATIONS

[Figure 4.60]
4.29

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRU

BROW

NEW

TAR

DAVIE BLVD

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE

[Figure 4.61] [Figure 4.62] Key map

Recommended planting stripbetween sidewalk and residential buildings 66’

3RD AVENUE Street Design Example

REVISED MAY 2007

NOTE ON STREET DESIGN EXAMPLES:The street design examples illustrate principles and guidelines, and do not representfully engineered solutions. Other alternatives are acceptable, as long as they satisfythe fundamental urban design principles ofthe Master Plan. The City has the flexibilityto work with the Master Plan street designrecommendations to make them compatiblewith changing or unforeseen conditions,and ongoing studies. 
AVENUE Street Design Example

vitalized ‘main street’”

allenges to 3rd Avenue, and

der to become an interesting,

[Figure 4.65] 

R

ATIONS
[Figure 4.66]

4.31

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRU

BROW

NEW

TAR

DAVIE BLVD

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE

[Figure 4.67] Key map

ANDREWS AVENUE Street Design Example

rd Avenue

will be sim

ed by con

Village and

etail ‘main

REVISED MAY 2007

NOTE ON STREET DESIGN EXAMPLES:The street design examples illustrate principles and guidelines, and do not representfully engineered solutions. Other alternatives are acceptable, as long as they satisfythe fundamental urban design principles ofthe Master Plan. The City has the flexibilityto work with the Master Plan street designrecommendations to make them compatiblewith changing or unforeseen conditions,and ongoing studies. 
REETS Street Design Example

hborhood connectors”

y residential streets have right

 Current regulations have the

ke streetscapes, or wide-open

nation of both. This will not

hborhood feeling. Street and

pe a range of residential build

rmonious, pedestrian-oriented

suffer from inconsistent curb

for on-street parking on both

paving in parking lanes should

ease the visual roadway width.

oken up by occasional planted

ain street trees along the nar

es between the sidewalk and

intersections with taller palm

s at intersections. Mini-round

all local-to-local intersections,

ts (landscape, fountain, etc) to

eets. This technique is 

common in many cities, and allows the re-opening of currently barricaded streets in areas such as Flagler Heights.

 The building to building setbacks allow for a ‘green’ semi-private planting area between the sidewalk and building. This

space may also be occupied by entry stairs, or stoops, andprojecting bay windows (or other architectural elements.) Thisspace should not be paved (except at building entrances), andshould not be used for parking.

 Discourage all curb-cuts except where absolutely unavoidable.

Parking, service and other vehicular access should be fromside streets or alleys wherever possible.

BEFORE [Figure 4.68] 
4.33

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

[Figure 4.69] [Figure 4.70] Key map

LOCAL STREETS Street Design Example

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK

BROWAR

NEW R

TARPO

DAVIE BLVD

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE
 design example

TIONS

[Figure 4.71]
4.35

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK

BROWAR

NEW R

TARPO

DAVIE BLVD

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE

[Figure 4.72]

LOCAL STREETS Street design example

[Figure 4.73] Key map

NOTE ON STREET DESIGN EXAMPLES:The street design examples illustrate principles and guidelines, and do not representfully engineered solutions. Other alternatives are acceptable, as long as they satisfythe fundamental urban design principles ofthe Master Plan. The City has the flexibilityto work with the Master Plan street designrecommendations to make them compatiblewith changing or unforeseen conditions,and ongoing studies. 

REVISED MAY 2007

7’

7’
etwall” should generally meet

In general, most of the building “streetwall” should meet the setback lines, except in cases of special entry features, architecturalarticulation, or in the instance of well-defined public spaces (seePrinciples of Building Design B-2). When all the buildings along astreet follow this principle, the street forms a well-defined, continuous corridor (with some variation) that encourages walkability andactivity along its length.

S OF BUILDING DESIGN

[Figure 4.76] ENCOURAGED [Figure 4.77]
4.37

pen space

unusable,

ble, subur

d building.

Dimensions and treatments often vary, resulting in a discontinuous,inefficient use of open space. As a result, the open space is ‘wasted’ rather than contributing to a vibrant public realm. Open spaceshould be consolidated and used to create pedestrian-friendlyspaces, parks, and plazas; ‘hard’ surfaces mixed with landscapingshould be encouraged to create usable, urban plazas. 

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown PRINCIPLES OF BUILDING DESIGN

ure 4.78] ENCOURAGED [Figure 4.79]

[Figure 4.80] Unusable ‘green’ spaces

resulting from building setbacks, with treesplaced on the wrong side of the sidewalk

[Figure 4.81] Open, or ‘green’, space

requirements can be organized and consolidated into usable public plazas, as inthis Coconut Grove example
d maximum building ‘street

dimension (“b”) of a building

ng begins to step back (“c”).

on the width of the street and

Varying streetwall heights in each of the Character Areas describedlater in this chapter will create different types of streets and streetsections. Building form will be used to distinguish different areasof the Downtown by creating a variety of different street-levelpedestrian experiences.(Refer to Character Area Guidelines later this chapter for details)

al ‘shoulder’ step-back)

NG DESIGN
4.39

• a break/ articulation of the façade; OR, • significant change of massing/ façade design

streetwall’

pe variety,

rrow-block

The princi

ontages is

 treatment

d pedestri

Building streetwalls in the Near Downtown and UrbanNeighborhood that exceed 300’ in length should be encouraged tocreate variation in the physical design and articulation of the streetwall through the following examples:

• division into multiple buildings/ but without superficial 

facade parapets

[Figure 4.85] Encouraged Streetwall Length

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown PRINCIPLES OF BUILDING DESIGN

OR

LESS PREFERRED

Line internal pedestrian,public “vias” with activeground floor uses; ORno “vias” with separatebuildings abutting oneanother

Public plaza/ open

space lined with activeground floor uses

NOTE

NOTE

[Figure 4.84] 

PREFERRED PREFERRED

[Figure 4.86] 

MAY 2007
rea for towers.

 dramatically change the visu

kyline, the street environment,

.

ccording to Character Area. 

nes in Chapter 4 for details.

Note: Preferred floorplate GSF doesn’t include open balcony area).Varying floorplate areas in each of the Character Areas describedlater in this chapter will encourage more slender towers (allowingmore than one tower per project in some cases) and discouragemassive, bulky, ‘wall’-type buildings with larger floorplates, therebyproviding more light and air to streets/open spaces below.(Maximum floorplate area below shoulder height is not specified.)

NG DESIGN

ENCOURAGED

[Figure 4.89] [Figure 4.90]
4.41

ntages on

to orient

If a tower building has only one frontage, then this frontage isconsidered the Primary Street. If a Primary Street has a rightof-way < or = to 60 feet, then Building Design Principle B-7applies.

ENCOURAGED [Figure 4.93] Locate towers on primary streets (> 60 ft. wide)

- ‘Room to breathe’- Maintain street character

ure 4.91] [Figure 4.92]

DEFINITIONTower: Any floor above defined ‘streetwall’height used for framing the street, varies byCharacter Area

DEFINITIONPrimary & Secondary Streets: Wherebuildings have one frontage, this frontage isconsidered the Primary Street. Where buildings have two or more frontages, one isPrimary and at least one is Secondary. ThePrimary Street is the one with the most significant pedestrian activity or overall urbanimportance. The Primary Street is usually,but not always, the street with the greatestright-of-way dimension. Las Olas Blvd is anexample of a Primary Street that is sometimes a smaller right-of-way than theSecondary ones that cross it. Interpretationof Primary & Secondary designations varydepending on the specific site, and shouldbe confirmed with City staff.

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown PRINCIPLES OF BUILDING DESIGN
th a right-of-way < or = to 60

e ‘shoulder’ are encouraged

et (for Character Areas other

n these cases is 30 feet, and

d within a 60 degree triangle

ocated on a corner site, where

increased stepbacks from the

both streets, provided that the

r with the preferred maximum

Where atypical lot dimensions (such as unusually narrow blocks)occur, the principle of minimizing the impact of higher buildings onsmaller streets and lower scale building fabric still applies, but sitespecific solutions need to be found for placement of higher elements. One way of achieving this guideline could be through thedevelopment of a Precinct plan.

NG DESIGN

[Figure 4.96]

60 

NAL

LE

0 

E

PREFERRED

LDER'

HT

ES) 

BASE 

TOWER 

MIN. 30' 

o

o

[Figure 4.95]
4.43

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

along the

In general, surface parking along street frontages should beavoided. However, when it is unavoidable, access and frontageshould be limited to Secondary Streets. Parking lots create‘dead’ spaces along pedestrian-oriented streets, where streetlife and street-space definition are lost. Parking within the interior of a block with discrete access is a preferred alternative. 

ure 4.97] ENCOURAGED [Figure 4.98]

PRINCIPLES OF BUILDING DESIGN

DEFINITIONPrimary & Secondary Streets: Wherebuildings have one frontage, this frontage isconsidered the Primary Street. Where buildings have two or more frontages, one isPrimary and at least one is Secondary. ThePrimary Street is the one with the most significant pedestrian activity or overall urbanimportance. The Primary Street is usually,but not always, the street with the greatestright-of-way dimension. Las Olas Blvd is anexample of a Primary Street that is sometimes a smaller right-of-way than theSecondary ones that cross it. Interpretationof Primary & Secondary designations varydepending on the specific site, and shouldbe confirmed with City staff.
ry streets and alleys. 

and minimize visual exposure

he ground floor of a parking

arage should not be visible

, and parks (see Q5). Active

ong primary streets, water

as a preferred design.

Parking garage design should be well integrated with the overall building design.In order to create vibrant streetscapes, structured parkings encouraged to be shielded from streets with a ‘liner’ of active uses (residential/ commercial/ office).

NG DESIGN

PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

[Figure 4.101] [Figure 4.102]

REVISED MAY 2007
4.45

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown PRINCIPLES OF BUILDING DESIGN

[Figure 4.104] Parking integrated with

building design – does not impact pedestrian activity on-street, and does not dominate view

Figure 4.103]

eyond the

ed to sec

treet inter

g garages

screening

chitectural

, etc.).

Liner uses are encouraged to provide active, occupied space(residential, commercial, cultural, etc) at the street level andupper floors along primary streets, parks, and waterway.Landscaping, plazas, or active uses are encouraged to concealor enhance rooftop parking areas.Active building uses are encouraged to cover entire streetfrontage ‘b’Minimum criteria for liner depth ‘a’:

Where retail is not feasible:

townhouses w/ individual entryoffice/ conference room spaceother active/ transparent use 

2 LOT DEPTH <150’ ground nd & up

25’min40’min40’min

25’ min Residential/ live- work30’ min Retail/cultural30’ min Office2 LOT DEPTH <150’ ground nd & up

25’min40’min40’min

25’ min Residential/ live- work30’ min Retail/cultural30’ min Office

2 LOT DEPTH 150’ or > ground nd & up

25’min60’min40’min

25’ min Residential/ live- work40’ min Retail/cultural30’ min Office2 LOT DEPTH 150’ or > ground nd & up

25’min60’min40’min

25’ min Residential/ live- work40’ min Retail/cultural30’ min Office

REVISED MAY 2007
NG DESIGN

nce to face street.

encouraged to face the street

he more pedestrian entrances

nteresting the street becomes.

ge pedestrian activity, accom

y foot, from on-street parking,

and from transit. If interior-block parking exists, there may also besecondary entrances from the parking area, or mid-block pedestrian passages from parking areas to the street. Buildings set backfrom the street behind surface parking lots are discouraged, sincethey draw pedestrian life away from the streets, and createunpleasant approaches to their entrances for people arriving at thebuilding on foot. 

[Figure 4.105] ENCOURAGED [Figure 4.106]
4.47

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown PRINCIPLES OF BUILDING DESIGN

ENCOURAGED [Figure 4.108]

 drop-offs

street-life.

ommodat

parking at

ound floor

[Figure 4.107]
verted’ ground floors with

ramework Plan (Figure 3.81)

d undertake an in-depth retail

effective and realistic retail

wn. Active ground-floor retail

pedestrian-oriented corridors

borhood locations, such as

 ‘square’. Ground floor retail

development; rather, it should

be encouraged in market-supported areas that contribute to awell-planned, interconnected, active streetscape.Where ground floor retail is not appropriate, other ‘extroverted’program elements should be located on the ground floor orwherever possible such as residential common areas. Theseuses should have transparent and open facades and avoidblank walls wherever possible.

NG DESIGN

[Figure 4.109] DISCOURAGED [Figure 4.110]

 DECORATED WALL WITH

NINGS OR ACTIVE USES ON

GROUND FLOOR

GROUND FLOOR

PARKING

GROUND FLOOR PARKING
4.49

Encourage pedestrian shading devices of various types.Pedestrian comfort and visual interest can be achieved through theconsistent use of a variety of shading devices. These elementsmay project beyond building setback lines. Some options include:

• Awnings• Arcades• “Eyebrow” overhangs• Miscellaneous shade structures

(Shading devices should be used in conjunction with street trees.)

[Figure 4.112] Fixed awnings[Figure 4.113] Movable awnings[Figure 4.114] ‘Eyebrow’ overhang

B-12

[Figure 4.111]

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown PRINCIPLES OF BUILDING DESIGN
ndows to animate residential

add to the quality of residential

sual variety of the streetscape.

s can break up the potential

 Balconies, in particular, take

ar-round climate by lining the

paces.

Balconies and bay windows may project beyond building setbacklines (to be coordinated with City Staff on a case by case basis,and subject to potential conflicts.) When possible, depth of balconies should provide outdoor space that is usable and accessibleby apartments. “False” balconies are discouraged. 

[Figure 4.115] ENCOURAGED [Figure 4.116]

NG DESIGN
4.51

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE: Building a Livable Downtown PRINCIPLES OF BUILDING DESIGN

rances to

hborhood

distributed

perceived)

, especial

ances also

street.

[Figure 4.118] Vancouver, BC, Canada

- Townhouses at base of apartment building- Increased activity, safety at street level

Figure 4.117] ENCOURAGED [Figure 4.120]

[Figure 4.122] Delray Beach

- Each unit has separate entrance- Garden areas and steps enhance privacy

[Figure 4.119] [Figure 4.121]
er floor uses and pedestrian

-rises, often fail to address the

uses and pedestrian-oriented

n inappropriate prioritization of

 and other factors. Therefore,

extra effort must be made to integrate these larger buildings intothe fabric of a continuous pedestrian-oriented urban environmentby utilizing various strategies described in this chapter. Key amongthese is the addition of lower scale active uses, such as retail oradditional residential, at the perimeter of the site.

ENCOURAGED

[Figure 4.125] [Figure 4.126]

NG DESIGN
4.53

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown 

[Figure 4.128]

Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, Spain.

dings and

Civic or government buildings, cultural facilities, and other specialmonuments should have particular prominence within theDowntown.In the tradition of great examples from many citiesaround the world, these buildings should have greater freedom inform and architectural expression. These signature landmarks ofcity-wide importance will stand out by being the “exception to therule”, and have a greater impact when surrounded by strong andwell-defined streetscapes which are encouraged elsewhere in thischapter.

27]

ada.
rights-of-way(air rights)

priate to lot size and block

es over alley rights-of-way

rated design.

NG DESIGN

[Figure 4.129] ENCOURAGED [Figure 4.130]

ADDED MAY 2007
4.55

4

design guidelines

PRINCIPLES FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown OF BUILDING DESIGN

DISCOURAGED

y preclud

ghts, wall

mproperly

to atmos

nshielded

 that are

hout con

e sodium)

couraged

Mitigate noise pollution:Mechanical equipment, exhaust fans, generators and othersimilar noise-producing equipment should be muffled anddirected away from streets, public spaces, and adjacent properties 

[Figure 4.131]

MAY 2007 B-19 ADDED MAY 2007
towers on adjacent lots:

intain vertical open space

inimum horizontal distance

ee Character Area Guidelines

Abutting property owners can coordinate tower placement (anddeviate from 30’ requirement) as long as they maintain 60’clearance

* with special review for non-parallel building facades and specialarchitectural features

NG DESIGN

[Figure 4.132] ENCOURAGED [Figure 4.133]

ADDED MAY 2007
4.57

4

design guidelines

PRINCIPLES FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown OF BUILDING DESIGN

Figure 4.134] ENCOURAGED

 a single

[Figure 4.135]

MAY 2007
NG DESIGN

m ground floor elevation of 2’

or individual ground floor

[Figure 4.136] [Figure 4.137] 

ADDED MAY 2007
4.59

m streets’

ay, or that

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown PRINCIPLES OF BUILDING DESIGN

138] ENCOURAGED [Figure 4.139] ENCOURAGED [Figure 4.140]

MAY 2007
visual amenities that provide a com

scaped spaces (recreation & open

inable roof treatments (environmen

A

C

A

D

E

”

[Figure 4.141] [Figure 4.142] [Figure 4.143] 

UILDING DESIGN

ADDED MAY 2007
4.61

4

design guidelines QUALITY OF ARCHITECTURE FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

Figure 4.147]

ondon

[Figure 4.148]

Vancouver

[Figure 4.149]

Pittsburgh

[Figure 4.144] 

Tokyo 

[Figure 4.145] 

Chicago

[Figure 4.146] 

San Francisco

ne com

 to con

uderdale.

s should

al promi

culptural

istances.

awkward

ntial neg

MAY 2007
all buildings above 37 sto

own Core

the skyline through architec

es of design approaches

els

orms

ms

s

ing

cture of the building

ecks at upper levels

[Figure 4.151] [Figure 4.152] [Figure 4.153] [Figure 4.154] 

S’

CTURE

ADDED MAY 2007
4.63

4

design guidelines

QUALITY OF ARCHITECTURE FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

building,

ty for the

nd lighting

 masonry,

and glass

Avoid less durable materials, such as EIFS, at first 2 floorsAvoid less durable materials, such as vinyl or aluminum siding,molded plastic or fiberglass details and moldings

Figure 4.155] [Figure 4.156] 

[Figure 4.157] [Figure 4.158] 

ADDED MAY 2007

ATERIALS
CTURE 

[Figure 4.159] [Figure 4.160] 

use of buildings with historic

 maintained; 

estored; 

 maintained;

g should be respected; 

op & adjacent additions are 

ORIC BUILDINGS

ADDED MAY 2007
4.65

4

design guidelines

QUALITY FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown OF ARCHITECTURE

[Figure 4.162]

[Figure 4.163]

reet,

view tech

ling street

High quality, durable exterior materialsRicher material pallette, more intensive details and lightingencouraged for the street level.

MAY 2007
CTURE 

d to the unique nature of the

[Figure 4.164] 

[Figure 4.165] [Figure 4.166]

ADDED MAY 2007

TURAL ENVIRONMENT
4.67

4

design guidelines

QUALITY OF ARCHITECTURE FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

ON

[Figure 4.167] 

ades

posi

[Figure 4.170] [Figure 4.171] 

2007
CTURE 

al styles that each create a

est quality expression of its

 that is meant to imitate the

r mimic older buildings in a

NFIDENT DESIGN

[Figure 4.174] [Figure 4.175] 

[Figure 4.172] 

ADDED MAY 2007
4.69

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

[Figure 4.176] 

here it

hown at

[Figure 4.177] 

MAY 2007
efront styles & types in adja

uildings, to create variety

vel

[Figure 4.178] [Figure 4.180]

[Figure 4.179]

ADDED MAY 2007
4.71

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown STORE FRONTS

ENCOURAGED

[Figure 4.182] 

& cultural

, EIFS

 MAY 2007
loor height and, encourage

jacent public sidewalk 

[Figure 4.183]

ADDED MAY 2007
4.73

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown STORE FRONTS

cy & views

primarily

alk

hysical

[Figure 4.185] [Figure 4.188] [Figure 4.189]

[Figure 4.186] [Figure 4.187]

ED DISCOURAGED ENCOURAGED

MAY 2007
 devices of various types

e 4.190] [Figure 4.191] [Figure 4.192]

ADDED MAY 2007
4.75

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown STORE FRONTS

disguise

Encourage well-designed night-lighting solutions to:

Animate the street after business hoursSpotlight tenant’s merchandise without distracting reflections or light spillage onto adjacent properties

SF-8

[Figure 4.195] 

[Figure 4.196] 

[Figure 4.194] 

MAY 2007 ADDED MAY 2007
SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK BLVD

BROWARD BLVD

LAS OLAS BLV

NEW RIVER

TARPON RIVER

DAVIE BLVD

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE

[Figure 4.197] The Downtown RAC with Character Area designations

R AREA GUIDELINES 

acter Areas

KEY

Downtown Core

Near DowntownUrban Neighborhood

 will create a variety of urban

Creating a pedestrian 'sense of

owntown RAC depends on the

ve character and special quali

sed on the existing street grid,

king distances, and other fac

xisting and emerging develop

gram illustrates three different

ique urban form and public

g common themes relating to

all three are essentially mixed

ng building forms and ratio of
4.77

onal, retail, and office

ousing variety

:

 framing of the street defined by

sis on 6-8 story building ‘shoul

with towers stepped back above.

Use:Primarily residentialCommunity retail & employmentForm:A varied neighborhood scale including amix of housing types such as townhousesand apartment buildings. Buildings stepback above defined bases, and verticalelements emphasize primary streets.

R DOWNTOWN URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD

Character Areas do not replace existing RACZoning. Character Areas & Zoning are complementary, serving different purposes.Character Areas apply new and updated‘Urban Design’ guidelines. RAC Zoningheight and density limits apply in allCharacter Areas.

CHARACTER AREA GUIDELINES

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown
[Figure 4.199] 

stage 1,

7 floors

Max. Height: 30 floors (Preferred) Building Type: Building Shoulders, Stage1 and stage 2 towers.Preferred Max. Floorplate Size:

Office: 32,000 SF 

no max to 7 floors 

Residential: 12,500 – 18,000 SF

no max to 7 floors 

Max. Height: 6 floors (Preferred) 

12 floors by “conditional

use process” per ULDR (where allowancesfor additional height are permitted for specific locations pursuant to the ULDR, thenthe ULDR shall control)Building Type: Building shoulders andstage 1 towers.Preferred Max. Floorplate Size:

Office: 16,000 SF

no max to 5 floors

Residential: 10,000 SF

no max to 5 floors 

12 Floors

6 Floors

RE NEAR DOWNTOWN URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD

DELINES

road map by which buildings are designed and built in the Downtown such that they contribute to the cre

enter with strong and dynamic neighborhoods: an urban fabric of walkable, tree-lined streets; an integrat

nd distinct public spaces; high quality buildings designed and oriented to provide light and air at the street

 environment. Although following this road map will lead to buildings that meet the vision, principles and

esigns that vary from these guidelines, while clearly meeting their intent, will also be considered.

ADDED MAY 2007
4.79

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

SUNRISE BLVD

SISTRUNK BLVD

BROWARD BLVD

LAS OLAS BLV

NEW RIVER

TARPON RIVER

DAVIE BLVD

FEDERAL HWY

3RD AVE

ANDREWS AVE

FEC RAIL LINE

KEY

Downtown Core

Near DowntownUrban Neighborhood

[Figure 4.200] The Downtown RAC with Character Area designations

CHARACTER AREA GUIDELINES
street

Special architectural design encouraged for buildings over 37 floors (SignatureTower).

[Figure 4.203] 

1-B

[Figure 4.202] 

NON-RESIDENTIAL

DELINES REVISED MAY 2007

OWN CORE
CHARACTER AREA GUIDELINES

AREA 1: DOWNTOWN CORE

4.81

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

nd provide

LDINGS ABOVE

OULDER(WHEN

R 15 FLOORS)

500 sf max.(Preferred)

[Figure 4.205] * Special design and develop- ment encouraged for buildings

above 37 floors( Signature Tower)

*SPECIAL DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS:Requirements for representation of skyline views from various viewpoints.Participation in public initiatives: i.e. upper level publicamenities, street level uses,and additional public improvements, that will benefit thedevelopment project and itsenvirons.Dramatic and/or elegant building form with both a compelling street and skyline presence.Consistent and integratedarchitectural details.High quality materials.
DELINES

DOWNTOWN

priate

Building ‘Shoulder’ guidelines:Encourage more human-scaled “framing”of the street.Note: Area above 7 floors allows foradditional bulk in non-tower building

Encourage maximum building heightof 30 floors

e 4.207] 

2-B

[Figure 4.208] 

NON-RESIDENTIAL

[Figure 4.209] 

NON-TOWER OPTION

REVISED MAY 2007
CHARACTER AREA GUIDELINES

AREA 2: NEAR DOWNTOWN

4.83

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

line and

Note: Tower Guidelines on this page are alternatives and shouldnot be combined in a single tower.

00 sf max.

[Figure 4.211] 

INGS UP TO 30 

RS
DELINES

 NEIGHBORHOOD

reetwall height. Townhouses are a suitable option, especially on alley blocks.

3-B

[Figure 4.214] 

REVISED MAY 2007
CHARACTER AREA GUIDELINES

AREA 3: URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD

4.85

conditional

NON-RESIDENTIAL

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

RESIDENTIAL

[Figure 4.216] [Figure 4.217] 
[Figure 4.219] 

HOOD TRANSITIONS

PE I

YPE I

ansition areas (blue areas on

ary, increased 1’ for every 1’ of

istance of 100’

transition areas (to include

abuts zones with height limit =

on)

ADDED MAY 2007
NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSITIONS

TRANSITION TYPE II

4.87

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

[Figure 4.221] 

icts (max

whichever

gram): see

oning disC DISTRICTS

or Special Districts:

ral District

[Figure 4.222] 

 PLANNING DISTRICTS ADDED MAY 2007
4.89

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

RAL

nt projects

GOVERNMENT CAMPUS 

Combined City/ County government campusMixed-use residential, office and retail Pedestrian-friendly streetscapesLinks to multi-modal transitPublic open spaceHigh quality civic architecture

ocus

warehouse

JUDICIAL CAMPUS 

Strengthen existing courts-district south of the RiverRevitalize underutilized sitesCreate new active relationship to Riverwalk areaMinimize negative urban design impacts of perimeter securityrequirements

THEMATIC PLANNING DISTRICTS
NT GUIDELINES

street and pedestrian con

e the visual presence of the

ic access 

[Figure 4.224] 

ADDED MAY 2007
4.91

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown RIVERFRONT GUIDELINES

long both

[Figure 4.226] 

[Figure 4.225] 

MAY 2007
destrian connections to the

ks, double row of trees,

d active ground floor uses 

[Figure 4.227] [Figure 4.228] 

INES 

ADDED MAY 2007
4.93

4

design guidelines

RIVERFRONT FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown GUIDELINES

Create at least one key pedestrian gateway from each riverfront development to public riverwalk

R-4

[Figure 4.229] 

ADDED MAY 2007
erwalk Master Plan (Small Area

to separate character areas

as, with unique setback, stepback,

palette variations

urban/active to less-urban/passive

erwalk, small scale open cafes and

along the river’s edge adjacent to

 These open air structures should

not inhibit views and access along

[Figure 4.230] 

INES 

ADDED MAY 2007
4.95

4

design guidelines

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown RIVERFRONT GUIDELINES

[Figure 4.233] 

st dimen

for build

from) the

[Figure 4.232] 

MAY 2007
TATION

 of high-quality precedents

eference by developers

[Figure 4.234] 

ADDED MAY 2007


IMPLEMENTATION5

FORT LAUDERDALE: Building a Livable Downtown

chapter

5

implementation

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

5.3

nt shift in

uses had

ades, so

econom

nd trans

It is now

onal and

s kinds of

ne-issue

o ensure

eving an

 need to

pts to do

Because the city's evolution is dynamic and not entirelypredictable in detail, the Master Plan focuses on thebroad relationships among areas, networks, uses andactivities, and buildings and streets. It maintains a margin of flexibility in its particulars. It is therefore importantthat the implementation process remain supple. As initiatives arise in a given area, a detailed response anddirection should be provided to project proponents, giving consideration to need, opportunity and market conditions. Guidance from the City should focus primarilyon issues of fit and context as well as on the creationand maintenance of an attractive, safe and well-usedpublic realm, a fundamental factor in urban vitality.With this objective in mind, the Master Plan proposes adesign-based way of visualizing and thinking about theDowntown that emphasizes compatible built-form whileencouraging mixed-use. It is intended to be a flexibleand usable document, providing a widely supportedframework for decision-making. It allows for the evolution of detailed physical design over time to accommodate changing circumstances and market conditions.

N
ted downtown core is the

 benefits all stakeholders.

e value of private invest

ent and adds to the city's

 in a snowball-like effect.

emented through a series

jects. The identification of

e standard and lead the

zation is vitally important.

nds will be required and

o leverage private invest

ew project can be multi

pands an existing zone of

 realized through a com

s scales. Although large

the investment in attract

exclusion of smaller, finer

s seldom a single "magic

o support modest incre

existing assets and areas.

Small scale opportunities - re-use of existing vacantlands and under-utilized buildings, public, private andcommunity initiatives - should all be harnessed andcapitalized upon. While these types of initiatives maynot have large immediate impacts individually, cumulatively and over time they effect profound change. The Master Plan does not in itself constitute a revisionof existing policy, process or regulations. Public agencies will be responsible for crafting an approach toimplementing the Master Plan recommendations. Thiswill require a variety of approaches and actions. Theseare distinct form the Master Plan itself, and can changeand evolve over time without affecting the consensusprinciples of the Plan. The Plan should be seen as a framework or "roadmap”to be put into practice by a variety of means, includingchanges to the regulatory structure and process, procedures for development review and approval, incentives for development, public investment programs andother implementation techniques. It identifies a range
5

implementation

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

5.5

elopment

ities and

e efforts

as pollu

jor infra

n guiding

effective

ections it

uals and

ter Plan

his may

 particu

ernment.

red sup

ster Plan,

City gov

ticipated

 through

public meetings and workshop discussions. The continuing value of broad-based involvement needs to beemphasized during the implementation phases. Ongoing effort should be devoted to expanding thisinvolvement and encouraging broad community outreach as the vision evolves. 

IMPLEMENTATION

AN OVERVIEW
wn will provide new oppor

elopment initiatives, eco

ms, public improvement

menities. The Downtown

ving and dynamic mix of

ape the growth into a sus

nned land uses, densities

g blocks for revitalization,

pes, urban form and activ

s and policies for future

wntown primarily reside in

and Future Land Use Plan

lan. These planning doc

ed and implemented in a

volves multiple layers of

pproach to land use plan

onsistency between local

nd state plans. 

Land Use Plans designate

tudy area as a "Regional

 designation: provides a

mework, with land use

parameters and implementation policies that areexpressly designed for the Downtown; enables the Cityto coordinate land use planning activities with the applicable agencies in one process; and, allows the City toutilize land use policies intended to increase planneddensities and uses, and create a mixed-use downtown. Downtown development in previous decades has beenmarked by periods of growth in discreet sectors. Therecent growth in the residential sector, coupled withprevious and on-going growth in the office and institutional sectors, has created an emerging mixed-use,urban environment. It is expected that the residentialcomponent of future growth will continue to play animportant role in the Downtown’s future. The RAC’sresidential component is defined by the specific number of dwelling units that are allocated for it in the Cityand County's Future Land Use Plans. This dwelling unitallocation for the Downtown RAC is a crucial factor infuture growth and development. Other land usesplanned in the RAC are included in the plans and policies contained in The Future Land Use Element of TheCity and County's Comprehensive Plans. 

AND USE & GROWTH
5

implementation

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

5.7

FUTURE LAND USE & GROWTH

ON

owntown

nterests.

s Future

ontext of

e Master

County's

by defin

 residen

en a pre

n recent

cated in

of 2003,

wn RAC.

stainable

owth and

ations by

 prohibit

own. It is

s recent

 current

 needed

Future residential and population growth in theDowntown quantified for the Master Plan analyzedproperty conditions, available land and infrastructure,comparable urban centers and future land uses in thecontext of the Master Plan vision. This analysis alsorecognized that sustainable urban centers evolve andchange through the process of redevelopment and revitalization. The analysis indicates that the Downtowncurrently has the potential for a total population of28,000 to 37,000 persons. This population couldincrease over time pending future policy and redevelopment initiatives and market factors. The currentdwelling unit allocation is not sufficient to meet marketor planned conditions. Therefore, it is important thatthe City and County monitor market and redevelopmentactivities to anticipate the future land use needs for thecontinued maturation of the Downtown and in turn,coordinate plans and policies to accomplish futuredwelling unit allocations. POPULATION
an be achieved incremen

pproach that seizes every

 and advance the larger

tal projects can be lever

For example, the cyclical

ewalks, services and utili

ake design changes for a

cost by integrating urban

mal capital budget prepa

elopment project creates

ortion of the public realm.

nt of streets, parks and

nterface with the public

expressed in the Master

ban design initiatives. For

ards for streets should

on greening the streets,

nd improving multi use of

 parking, signage, cross

re also typical improve

codified with the street

ds.

ublic improvements, and

e improvements, are also

factors that will need to be considered with the publicsector design issues. Other agencies such as BrowardCounty and Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT) are responsible for significant roadway and transit improvements in the Downtown. The DowntownDevelopment Authority (DDA) and CommunityRedevelopment Agency (CRA) also support a wide variety of capital improvements in the Downtown. The participation of these agencies is vital to the continuedimprovement of infrastructure and facilities in the publicrealm. Design standards and the pre-design of publicimprovements involving these and other agencies willfurther the coordination of capital projects. This coordination also provides one of the best opportunities toleverage multi-agency funding sources and projects fora comprehensive approach to building the public realmand implementing the Downtown Master Plan. Anotheraspect of coordination that includes the private sector isthe timing and continuity of the development of capitalprojects. It is important that improvements in the public realm are designed and completed in a manner thatwill serve current and future needs. Therefore, the programming of the capital projects in the public realmmust be anticipated in a logical sequence and includedwith the capital facilities plans of the various responsible agencies and private entities. 

SIGN ISSUES
5

implementation

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

5.9

be imple

e private

thodolo

 encour

ssues to

of devel

c realm.

he devel

n design

 visibility

ontribut

nt, it ulti

ell as its

ed in the

eral than

head on

es. It is

es and a

ver time

at maxi

nd devel

ntation, a

al design

guidelines spelled out in the Master Plan to a level ofmore detailed urban design and guidelines in priorityareas. 

ES

DESIGN
 PROCESS

regime advocated by the

ed on an integrated view

using on the urban design

buildings. It is based on

bjectives, not rigid codes,

dded zoning complexity.

urban design relationships

of buildings and public

s well by examples and

d that the application of

nce objectives will require

dealing with particulars on

his kind of informed dia

 on the certainty of hard

l require trust and collab

essfully demonstrated in

approach seeks to foster

-design culture in Fort

c "grass-roots" support,

lic agencies, and elected

Based on need and the imminence of significantchange, the Master Plan foresees a process of PrecinctPlanning in which areas of particular focus would bestudied in greater detail when development opportunities arise. The urban design vision for groupings ofblocks, buildings and public spaces would beadvanced, identifying combined public/private opportunities to achieve larger goals. These Precinct Plans forareas of significant change could be initiated by the private sector or the public sector, including agencies,communities, or groups of area stakeholders. In thecase of public sector initiative, planning could be undertaken with City approval or in partnership with the City.Precinct boundaries would be decided on a case bycase basis, in collaboration with the various groupsinvolved. The Precinct Plans would set out a particular vision foreach of these areas including such things as: a generaldistribution of uses and activities; densities and floorarea ratios; building footprints and block layouts; building envelopes and illustrative building designs; acceptable ways of handling parking; an interconnected streetnetwork, including an internal hierarchy of streetsdesigned for a range of use and character; an open

PLANNING REGIME THE PRECINCT PLANNING OPTION
5

implementation

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

5.11

m to cre

y include

ways and

ace, both

he more

 accom

expecta

ps, such

hbors, to

onships;

building

ries.

ve com

nd neigh

hopping,

the chal

re highly

y or may

distance.

ssential.

Precinct Plans could be adopted by the CityCommission as a general guide - minor changes couldbe permitted with staff approval; major ones wouldrequire another Commission approval. Specific guidelines for the approval and amendment of the PrecinctPlans, and for the approval of subsequent Precinct Planprojects, need to be worked out fully by the City.Ultimately, the Precinct Plans need to be supported byregulatory strategies. Ideally, these should fit seamlessly into the existing zoning code not make the zoningregulations more complex, but simpler and morestreamlined. Other techniques such as PUD's (Planned UnitDevelopment) and Zoning Overlay Districts have beeneffective in other cities. Specific locally-appropriatetechniques will need to be found which can translateurban design plans into the regulatory regime in FortLauderdale. 

OTHER TECHNIQUES

PLANNING PROCESS

APPENDICES

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

A

zoning analysis

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

A.1

IS

ale Regional Activity Center 

SEC. 47-13.20. DOWNTOWN RAC REVIEW PROCESS AND SPECIAL REGULATIONS. 

ACKS PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY STREETS SECTION H IMAGE STREETS SECTION I NEW RIVER WATER FRONT CORRIDOR SECTION J ALL OTHER RAC STREETS SECTION K 

3.20 

provided in Sec 47-

 provided in Sec 47-

3.20 

esidential and mixed 

e provided for in Sec. 

ntial, apply minimum 

8, RMH-60**** 

esidential and mixed 

e provided for in Sec. 

ntial apply minimum 

8RMH-60  

3.20 

esidential and mixed 

e provided for in Sec. 

ntial, apply minimum 

8,RMH-60** ** 

esidential and mixed 

e provided for in Sec. 

ntial, apply minimum 

8, RMH-60  

3.20 

esidential and mixed 

e provided for in Sec. 

ntial apply minimum 

8, RMH-60** ** 

esidential and mixed 

e provided for in Sec. 

ntial apply minimum 

8,RMH-60  

3.20 

esidential and mixed 

e provided for in Sec. 

ntial, apply minimum 

8, RMH-60** **, 

ay be required see 

esidential and mixed 

e provided for in 

esidential, apply 

ec. 47-5.38, RMH

yard may be 

7-13.20. 

1. Building Frontage Setback Requirement – min 75% 

of linear frontage on ground floor 10 ft from property line. 

2. General Stepback and Setback Requirements – for 

portions of building located more than 9 ft above the sidewalk, See subsection H.9 

3. First Floor Uses – min 75% linear frontage for a 

depth of at least 20 feet from the building front shall be used for retail sales, retail banking, residential uses, food and beverage, commercial recreation, governmental facility, service use (not including professional office), public museum or art gallery, or other public cultural facility accessible to the public and occupants of the building in which the use is located. 

4. First Floor Transparency – min of 35% of first floor. 5. Awnings, canopies, arcades are required over all 

doors/windows required by subsection H.4 (height to be between 7ft 6in (this is currently being changed to 8 ft to be compatible with FBC) and 12 ft and 4 ft in depth). 

6. Cornice – a cornice shall be provided a min of 12 ft 

above sidewalk or at level similar to adjacent properties (max 35 ft). 

7. Street Trees – shade trees per 40 ft (shade trees 

14 ft high, palm 18 ft high, ornamental 12 ft high). Alternative configurations are considered. 

8. Location of Street Trees – may be located in public 

right-of-way. 

9. Building stepbacks – at cornice (see Section H.6) a 

min stepback of 10ft. At a level between 4th and 

10th floor an additional min 10 ft stepback or 

multiple ones, or alternative approved design. 

10. New develop/redevelopment – shall meet all of the 

ULDR and all other requirements of streets within 50ft of the closest street. 

11. This code does not apply to structures built before 

1997, unless 50% is voluntarily demolished/replaced 

1. Street 

requirements see Sections H.1, H.2, H.4, H.5, H.6, H.7, H.8, H.9, H.10, and H.11. 

1. Applies to parcel within 100 ft of 

the river (within RAC-CC & RACAS). A Min 60ft setback from seawall or high water mark for principal structures or less if existing ROW is less than 60ft, but in no case shall any be less than 45ft. Exceptions for less than 45ft setback: 

a. Any residential or 

marine use that is no higher than 35ft may have portions within a 20ft min setback (but must be compatibility). 

b. Structures may exceed 

requirements of J.1 and J.1a, but must provide additional setback requirements as structure height increases and must follow contain specific architectural features. 

2. Additional Criteria – along N. & S. 

New River Dr. development must follow regulations in Section H. Ground level uses must contain pedestrian oriented designs. 

1. All other streets 

shall provide: a. Min setback 

of 5ft from property line. 

b. Modifications 

may occur pending development. 

2. Street Trees, see 

H.7 

3. Location of Street 

Trees, see H.8 

ermit, 

 du/ac 

CC 
& GREEN SPACE ANALYSIS

nal Activity Center: Unit Count, 

nsity

STING CONDITIONS

1529

2141

3,670 7.8 du/ acre 4.9 du/ acre approx. 7,340

3670

1430

nly 216

ly 267

5,583 11.9 du/ acre 7.4 du/ acre approx. 11,166

5583

2960

8,543 18.3 du/ acre 11.4 du/ acre approx. 17,086

TURE ESTIMATES @ POTENTIAL FULL BUILD-OUT

8543

rom: 3157 to 14857

rom: 11,700 to 23,400 25.0 to 50.0 du/ acre 15.6 to 31.2 du/ acre approx. 23,400 to 46,800

700

3400

8543

18925 to 22710 125 to 150 du/acre

1240 50 du/acre

1155 to 2310 50 to 100 du/acre

3890 to 7780 50 to 100 du/acre

1065 to 2130 50 to 100 du/acre1135 to 2270 50 to 100 du/acre

255.5 35 du/acre

30 15 du/acre

average

rom: 36,239 to 47,269 77.4 to 101.0 du/ acre 48.3 to 63.0 du/ acre approx. 72,477 to 94,537

GROSS approximately 30 du/ acre *anecdotalGROSS approximately 35 du/ acre *anecdotal

(NET) (GROSS) (# units x 2 occ.)

# Units Density Density Population Estimate

Density

(NET)

# Units

(# units x 2 occ.)

Density Population Estimate

(GROSS)

(includes New River and canals)(approx. 38% of Gross)(approx. 71% of Net)
B.2

147.4 du/ acre

133.3 du/ acre122.3 du/ acre

122.0 du/ acre

107.0 du/ acre 5 levels + 1 level retail (9000 sf); 506 pkg; 80' 

85.0 du/ acre

59.5 du/ acre 11 levels; 30,000 sf office/retail; 380 pkg; 143'51.0 du/ acre25.0 du/ acre

190 sf= 16.6 acres

771 sf= 1.7 acres

955 sf= 4.2 acres

992 sf= 0.8 acres

908 sf= 23.4 acres= 3% of Gross RAC area

90 acres

113.4 acres= 14% of altered Gross area

37.5 acres to 5% of Gross RAC area

75.0 acres 10% of Gross RAC area

81.9 acres min. 11% of Gross RAC area

163.8 acres min. 23% of Gross RAC area330.8 acres min. 46% of Gross RAC area NOT POSSIBLE

168.5 acres min. 23% of Gross RAC area

337.0 acres min. 47% of Gross RAC area NOT POSSIBLE680.4 acres min. 94% of Gross RAC area NOT POSSIBLE

Density

(NET)

B

capacity study

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

[Figure B.1] Map showing soft site assumptions
NALYSIS

C

marketing study

FORT LAUDERDALE: Building a Livable Downtown

and Projections by Use through 2010 

preliminary findings related to the 

y Use (through 2010). The basis for our 

mic, demographic and market trends both 

nd for specific uses in Downtown Fort 

-Sale Housing, Retail, and Hotel. Our 

ysis. 

and is summarized herein and segmented 

e downtown area is one of the principal 

, office and retail. Therefore, projecting 

le through 2010 provides the basis for 

nd, as well as other factors that will be 

e. 

oyment in downtown Ft. Lauderdale. 

d projected employment base, we 

within the downtown Ft. Lauderdale 

oyment. 

e and the Ft. Lauderdale Downtown 

0 million square feet of (private sector) 

nal 225,000 square feet of public sector 

feet per private office worker1 and 225 

age occupancy of 90 percent, current 

00 persons. 

oyment, as well as the estimates for 

ng table to illustrate our analysis: 

Based upon Florida Department of Labor statistics, Broward County’s total employment in 2002 was 781,293. Accordingly, the Department of Labor projects employment to be 888,232 in 2010, or an average annual increase of 13,367 jobs during the next eight years. To ascertain the need for office space among the employment sectors, we estimate that approximately 95 percent of FIRE sector jobs require office space, 27.5 percent of Services sector require office space, and 10 percent of all other sectors require office space. Based upon these assumptions, office employment for the County is currently in the range of 180,000, increasing to 205,000 (or 3,300 office jobs per annum) in 2010. Considering that Downtown Fort Lauderdale represents approximately 15 percent of the County’s inventory (reported to be roughly 35 million square feet), the analysis indicates approximately 26,500 office jobs currently in downtown Ft. Lauderdale, which is directly in line with the 25,000 jobs estimated above. Therefore, as indicated in the table above, downtown Fort Lauderdale employment is projected to increase to 30,600 by 2010, or nearly 500 office jobs per year. If downtown captures slightly more than its “fair share” of office development during the next several years, the demand increased to between 650 to 700 office jobs per year. Retail/Hospitality – Again, there is no formal source of data that provides downtown employment statistics within the retail/hospitality sector. Nonetheless, we estimate 

Broward County Employment Projections Annual Annual

by Industry (2002 and 2010) 2002 2010 Change %Change

Agricultural & Mining 10,848 12,986 267 2.3%

Construction 41,310 44,722 427 1.0%

Manufacturing 38,120 34,234 (486) -1.3%

Trans., Comm. & Utility 32,825 37,626 600 1.7%

Wholesale Trade 47,489 53,491 750 1.5%

Retail Trade 148,286 163,715 1,929 1.2%

FIRE 51,970 57,418 681 1.3%

Services 318,299 380,455 7,770 2.3%

Government 92,146 103,585 1,430 1.5%

Total 781,293 888,232 13,367 1.6%

*Self Employed and Unpaid Family labor included within Services sector

Broward County Office Employment Annual Annual

by Industry (2002 and 2010) 2002 2010 Change %Change

Percent of FIRE: 95% 49,372 54,547 647 1.3%

Percent of Services: 27.5% 87,532 104,625 2,137 2.3%

Percent Other 10.0% 41,102 45,036 492 1.1%

 Total Office Employment 178,006 204,208 3,275 1.7%

Downtown Ft. LauderdaleOffice Employment (2002 and 2010)% of County: 15.0% 26,701 30,631 491 1.7%

% of County: 20.0% 35,601 40,842 655 1.7%

Source: Florida Dept. of Labor; Black's Office Guide; Lambert Advisory

Broward County and Downtown Fort Lauderdale

Office Employment (Existing and Projected Demand)

2002 and 2010
C.2

C

marketing study

FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown

hich 

il 

etail 

wn retail 

onal 

 jobs 

opment 

onable to 

er year. 

 2,300 

 

for 

mining 

ctors that 

vides a 

rized as: 

and 

nditions; 

d upon 

erdale 

As noted 

by 

approximately 500 to 700 jobs per year. Utilizing the factor of 225 square feet of space per employee, following is a summary of projected demand for three scenarios: 

Downtown Ft. LauderdaleOffice Space Demand (Projected 2010) Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3Projected Annual Employment Growth: 500 700 900 Sq.Ft. per Employee 225 s.f. 225 s.f. 225 s.f.Total Office Space Demanded (annual): 112,500 s.f. 157,500 s.f. 202,500 s.f.Total Office Space Demanded 2003 to 2010: 900,000 s.f. 1,260,000 s.f. 1,620,000 s.f.

As a measurement against historical office development trends in downtown Fort Lauderdale, an average of approximately 190,000 square feet of space has been added to the market annually since 1980. Housing Demand

Housing demand for downtown Ft. Lauderdale is driven by employment growth, and from non-downtown workers and second home residents; accordingly, the distinction between rental and for-sale demand has been contemplated. Following is a summary of assumptions and factors used to project demand for housing: 

Employment Conversion – In an effort to derive a factor to “convert” downtown employment to residential demand, we reference a study conducted by the Miami Downtown Development Authority (1998) that surveyed downtown office workers to measure their interest in living within the CBD (in either rental of for-sale). The survey indicated that 18 percent of all office workers were “very likely” to live downtown (provided desirable available product) and an additional sixteen percent indicated that they would be “somewhat likely” to live downtown. Therefore, if we assume that 70 to 100 percent of the “very likely” candidates will actually move downtown, and 10 to 20 percent of the “somewhat likely” move downtown, we estimate an office worker-toresident “conversion” factor of 18 percent to 26 percent. In terms of converting retail/hospitality employment to residential demand, we assume that since wages are typically lower than that of the professional services, a worker-toresident “conversion” factor of 7.5 to 12.5 percent has been applied. Furthermore, assuming a maximum 50 percent of hospital workers are financially qualified for downtown housing, we apply a higher potential “capture” ratio for this employment base given their odd working hours and need to be close to work, estimated between 25 to 35. 

Downtown Ft. LauderdaleResidential Demand from Employment Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3Est. Annual Employment Growth (thru 2010) 600 700 800

% DT Office Employee (prefer DT residence) 18% 22% 26%Est. Retail/Hospitality DT Employment Growth 60 60 60

% DT Retail Employee (prefer DT residence) 8% 10% 13%

Est. Broward General/Other8 17 17 17

% DT 
C

marketing study

FORT LAUDERDALE: Building a Livable Downtown 

d applying the appropriate 

mand (rental and for-sale) from 

een roughly 120 and 220 households. 

roduct within the downtown market, 

for-sale and rental demand, we apply a 

Census data indicates that rental 

sing downtown, we apply an upward 

ncreasing younger, professional and 

his urban environment. 

of the renter demand will reside 

development type that is feasible to 

asing existing single family homes. 

l downtown rental and for-sale 

ment. As noted, upwards of 80 

d from downtown workers. However, 

that downtown Ft. Lauderdale 

torically lacked quality downtown 

reased level of demand from areas 

wntown employee demand adjustment 

cent, while for-sale housing will have 

o the fact that there is a significant 

Scenario 3 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

221 117 165 221

50% 50% 50% 50%

111 58 82 111

90% 90% 90% 90%

100 52 74 100

60% 70% 60% 50%

166 75 124 199

1,328 600 990 1,593

For-Sale Housing

ted housing demand, we estimate that 

Ft. Lauderdale is in the range of 65 to 

s through 2010. Accordingly, we 

 in downtown Ft. Lauderdale is in the 

0 to 1,600 units through 2010. In 

e) is estimated to be roughly 145 to 

hrough 2010. 

Retail Demand

We have developed a retail trade model for downtown Fort Lauderdale which uses income and expenditure trends in a defined market area to determine demand for retail space by major retail category. Capture estimates take into account the strength of major retail nodes of activity outside of the trade area. It should be noted that our retail model has two components. The first model is based upon primary area resident, inflow from residents in the surrounding region, and visitor expenditure in the primary trade area. The second model is based upon the inflow of day time worker expenditure into downtown Fort Lauderdale driven by surveys of daytime worker expenditure conducted by the International Council of Shopping Centers in 1997. The Lambert Advisory Retail Trade Model is provided in detail, including a summary of our methodology, as an attachment to this memorandum. Following is a summary of retail demand by category: 

Downtown Ft. LauderdaleAvg. Annual Retail S.F. Demand by Category Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

Shoppers Goods* 6,000 8,500 11,000Food Stores 5,000 7,500 10,000Eating & Drinking Establishments 5,000 7,000 9,000Pharmacies 1,000 2,000 3,000Other Retail (Building, Liquor Stores) 2,100 3,500 5,000Total Retail Sq.Ft. Demanded (annually) 19,100 28,500 38,000Total Retail Sq.Ft. Demand (2003 to 2010) 133,700 199,500 266,000

* General Merchandise, apparel, furniture and home equip., hardware & misc.)

We estimate that retail space demand resident and day worker expenditure in downtown Fort Lauderdale will average approximately 22,000 to 38,000 square feet per year through 2010, or total 160,000 to 260,000 square feet during the period. This breaks down approximately 90 percent from expenditures of trade area residents, other inflow of resident sales from outside the trade area, and their visitors and 10 percent from non-resident day workers. Hotel Demand

Downtown Fort Lauderdale’s hotel market primarily comprises the Riverside Hotel and the new Hampton Inn, or a combined total of less than 300 rooms. Throughout the surrounding area, basically extending south to 17th Street, east to the beaches and north to 

Sunrise Boulevard., there is more than 4,500 hotel rooms which is deemed to adequately service existing and near term (future) demand. It is our belief that the downtown Fort Lauderdale hotel market should remain at least at current levels for the next twenty four to thirty six months. Beyond that time frame, we project that there may be an opportunity to build up to 250 rooms in the downtown area, representing the only addition to hotel supply in the downtown area through 2010. 
C

marketing study

FORT LAUDERDALE: Building a Livable Downtown

C.4

jected 

cenario 3

202,500

,620,000

166199

1,3281,593

365

2,921

38,000

266,000

N/A

250
D

design requirements 

ESIGN REQUIREMENTS FORT LAUDERDALE: Building a Livable Downtown

Current Standards 

County/State 

Master Plan Standards 

 100ft1 85-100ft 

120ft2 120ft 

88ft3 70ft 

80ft4 80ft 

- Varies 

; non

ke line ?? verify 6 + turn; no bike lane 

urn 8-lane & turn 6+ turn 

urn ?? verify 3+ turn + 1 bike lane 

urn ?? verify 3+ turn + 1 bike lane 

12ft5, 11ft6 11ft 

11ft7 10ft-6in 

10-11ft8 10ft 

11ft & 10ft9 10ft 

ed Not required 

Required on all streets except 

Broward and Federal 

8ft (art./coll.) 7ft (local) 

8ft & 7ft11 7ft 

5ft12 5ft 

4ft13 4ft 

3ft 3ft 

35ft14 15ft max 

1 Broward County Planning Council (Feb. 2002), Broward County Trafficways Plan2 Broward County Planning Council (Feb. 2002), Broward County Trafficways Plan3 Broward County Planning Council (Feb. 2002), Broward County Trafficways Plan4 Broward County Planning Council (Feb. 2002), Broward County Trafficways Plan5 Note: This is for an Arterial through or travel lane. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, pg 2-40 

6 Note: Is permitted on an Arterial given specific conditions. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, pg 2-40 

7 Note: For a Collector through or travel lane. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, pg 2-40 

8 Florida Department of Transportation (May 2002), Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for 

Design, Construction and Maintenance, for Streets and Highways (The Greenbook), pg 3-58 

9 Note: TDLC lane widths are 11ft, and can be reduced to 10ft given conditions. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, pg 21-5. 

10 City of Fort Lauderdale (Sept. 2002), Code of Ordnances and Unified Land Development 

Regulations, Sec. 47-20.11 

11 Note: TDLC parking lanes can be reduced to 7ft (measure from face of curb) in residential areas. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, Ch. 21. 

12 Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria 

and Process, Ch 8, pg 8-5 and Ch 21, pg 21.5 

13 Note: Measured from the lip of the gutter i.e. 5.5 ft wide. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, Ch 8, pg 8-5 and Ch 21, pg 21.5 

14 Note: Florida Building Code requires a 35ft min turning radius, and the CRA has been able to use 

a 20ft-turning radius, however, no information was found on this subject. 
D.2

 

Master Plan Standards 

t.b.d. t.b.d. t.b.d. 

None required None required None required 

No longer applicable: See Urban 

Design Guidelines Street Sections

No longer applicable: See Urban 

Design Guidelines Street Sections

5’ 

Varies; create Riverwalk Master 

Plan guidelines 

Shade-40ft o.c. max. 

Palm-20ft o.c. max. 

6’ shade, 8’ palm 

, 

s or 

mph)33

Min. 3ft ; Max. 5ft (new) 1.5ft (existing trees or design speed < 25mph) 

m curb No min. dist. from curb 

12ft 

6ft 

t 

Primary row of street trees adjacent

to curb 

18in max. 

D

design requirements

FORT LAUDERDALE: Building a Livable Downtown

g, , j

15 Note: Can have a hedge up to 30in measured from crown of roadway within limits of sight triangle. 

City of Fort Lauderdale (Sept. 2002), Code of Ordnances and Unified Land Development Regulations, Sec. 47-19.5 

16 Note: Can have a hedge up to 30in measured from crown of roadway within limits of sight triangle. 

City of Fort Lauderdale (Sept. 2002), Code of Ordnances and Unified Land Development Regulations, Sec. 47-19.5 

17 Note: Can have a hedge up to 30in measured from crown of roadway within limits of sight triangle. 

City of Fort Lauderdale (Sept. 2002), Code of Ordnances and Unified Land Development Regulations, Sec. 47-19.5 

18 Note: This is said to be a County Requirement, and most County requirements refer back to FDOT 

standards. 

19 Note: This is said to be a County Requirement, and most County requirements refer back to FDOT 

standards. 

20 Note: This is said to be a County Requirement, and most County requirements refer back to FDOT 

standards. 

21 Note: 75% of building frontage must be at a 10ft setback.

City of Fort Lauderdale (Sept. 2002), Code of Ordnances and Unified Land Development Regulations, Sec 47-13.20 

22 Note: Other parts of building can be at a 5ft setback. 

City of Fort Lauderdale (Sept. 2002), Code of Ordnances and Unified Land Development Regulations, Sec 47-13.20 

23 Note: 75% of building frontage must be at a 10ft setback. 

City of Fort Lauderdale (Sept. 2002), Code of Ordnances and Unified Land Development Regulations, Sec 47-13.20 

24 Note: Other parts of building can be at a 5ft setback. 

City of Fort Lauderdale (Sept. 2002), Code of Ordnances and Unified Land Development Regulations, Sec 47-13.20 

25 City of Fort Lauderdale (Sept. 2002), Code of Ordnances and Unified Land Development 

Regulations, Sec 47-13.20 

26 City of Fort Lauderdale (Sept. 2002), Code of Ordnances and Unified Land Development 

Regulations, Sec 47-13.20 

27 Note: Depending the condition the setback can be 20ft, 35ft, or 45ft. 

City of Fort Lauderdale (Sept. 2002), Code of Ordnances and Unified Land Development Regulations, Sec 47-13.20 

28 Note: This is for roadways within the RAC. 

City of Fort Lauderdale (Sept. 2002), Code of Ordnances and Unified Land Development Regulations, Sec 47-13.20 

29 Note: This is for roadways within the RAC. 

City of Fort Lauderdale (Sept. 2002), Code of Ordnances and Unified Land Development Regulations, Sec 47-13.20 

30 City of Fort Lauderdale (Sept. 2002), Code of Ordnances and Unified Land Development 

Regulations, Sec 47-13.20 

31 Note: This is from the sight distance at intersections. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2002). Design Standards for Design, Construction, Maintenance and Utility Operations on the State Highway System, Index 546. 

32 Note: This is for horizontal clearance to trees. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, pg 2-78 

33 Note: This is the TDLC Horizontal clearance to trees for EXISTING PLANTINGS. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, pg 21-7. Note: Florida Greenbook it calls for 1.5ft of clear zone on streets with design speeds of 25mph or less. Also if conditions due not permit clear zone can be reduced to 1.5ft, in cases of design speed > 25mh. Florida Department of Transportation (May 2002), Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance, for Streets and Highways (The Greenbook). Pg. 3-60. 

34 City of Fort Lauderdale (Sept. 2002), Code of Ordnances and Unified Land Development 

Regulations, Sec. 47-21.6 

35 City of Fort Lauderdale (Sept. 2002), Code of Ordnances and Unified Land Development 

Regulations, Sec. 47-21.6 

36 Note: This is from the sight distance at intersections. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2002). Design Standards for Design, Construction, Maintenance and Utility Operations on the State Highway System, Index 546 

30 ft

22 ft

none required

none requirednone required
D

design requirements

REMENTS FORT LAUDERDALE: Building a Livable Downtown

Current Standards 

County/State 

Master Plan Standards 

2ft37 18in 

4-6ft39, 6ft40 5ft min; actual varies 

12ft41, 11ft42, 10ft43 No min. 

11ft44, 10ft45 No min. 

?? No min. 

6ft (new trees)47, 3ft (existing trees)48 Min. 3ft (new and existing) 

8ft-6in49 8ft-6in 

< 18in50 18in max 

: Shade

o.c.51, 

ft o.c. 52

Shade-40ft o.c. max. 

Palm-20ft o.c. max. 

2ft53 18in 

12ft54, 11ft55, 10ft56 10ft 

11ft57, 10ft58 10ft 

No turn lanes 

11ft & 10ft59 10ft 

100ft60

Encourage reduced stacking 

lengths (See Urban Design 

guidelines) 

145ft plus queue length61

Encourage reduced stacking 

lengths (See Urban Design 

guidelines)

y p g yy

37 Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2002). Design Standards for Design, Construction, 

Maintenance and Utility Operations on the State Highway System, Index 300 

38 Note: This information comes from the Subdivision requirements. 

City of Fort Lauderdale (Sept. 2002), Code of Ordnances and Unified Land Development Regulations, Sec. 47-24.5 

39 Note: Standard width of a sidewalk should be 5 feet when separated from the back of curb by a 

buffer strip. A 4 foot sidewalk may be considered when physical constraints exist and where necessary right of way is unavailable or prohibitively expensive. When sidewalks must be constructed adjacent to the curb, the minimum width should be 6 feet. Florida Department of Transportation (May 2002), Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance, for Streets and Highways (The Greenbook). Pg. 3-17. 

40 Note: Measured from back of curb (not face). 

Florida Department of Transportation (2002). Florida Intersection Design Guide (on Florida State Hwy System)

41 Note: For medians on an Arterials. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, pg 2-40 

42 Note: Is permitted for medians on Arterials given conditions. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, pg 2-40

43 Note: Is permitted for medians on Arterials given conditions. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, pg 2-40 

44 Note: Is for a median on a Collector. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, pg 2-40 

45 Note: Is for a median on a Collector. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, pg 2-40 

46 NEED TO VERIFY, SAID TO BE A CITY REQUIREMENT AND MEASURED FROM FACE 

OF CURB 

47 Note: Is for the horizontal clearance to trees. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, pg 2-78 

48 Note: This is the TDLC horizontal clearance to trees for EXISTING PLANTINGS. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, pg 21-7 

49 Note: This is from the sight distance at intersections. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2002). Design Standards for Design, Construction, Maintenance and Utility Operations on the State Highway System, Index 546. 

50 Note: This is from the sight distance at intersections. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2002). Design Standards for Design, Construction, Maintenance and Utility Operations on the State Highway System, Index 546. 51 Note: This is for roadways within the RAC. 

City of Fort Lauderdale (Sept. 2002), Code of Ordnances and Unified Land Development Regulations, Sec 47-13.20 

52 Note: This is for roadways within the RAC. 

City of Fort Lauderdale (Sept. 2002), Code of Ordnances and Unified Land Development Regulations, Sec 47-13.20 

53 Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2002). Design Standards for Design, Construction, 

Maintenance and Utility Operations on the State Highway System, Index 300 

54 Note: This is for turn lanes on an Arterial. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, pg 2-40 

55 Note: Is permitted for turning lanes on an Arterial given conditions. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, pg 2-40 

56 Note: Is permitted for turning lanes on an Arterial given conditions. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, pg 2-40 

57 Note: Is permitted for turning lanes on a Collector given conditions. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, pg 2-40 

58 Note: Is permitted for turning lanes on a Collector given conditions. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, pg 2-40 

59 Note: TDLC turn lane widths are 11ft, and can be reduced to 10ft given conditions. 

Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria and Process, pg 21-5 

60 Florida Department of Transportation (Jan. 2003), Plans Preparation Manual – Design Criteria 

and Process, Sec. 2.13.2 

61 Note: Can almost assume a 1:1 ratio for queuing length, where 10 cars per hour equals 10 feet in 

length of turning lane queue length. Florida Department of Transportation (May 2002), Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance, for Streets and Highways (The Greenbook). Pg. 3-58
E

capital costs

FORT LAUDERDALE: Building a Livable Downtown

E.1

Major Capital Projects Conceptual Level Cost Estimates

New River Pedestrian Crossing

* Standard FDOT Movable Bridge (or) $ 7.0 M* Tramway (15 person gondola) $5 to $8 M* Ferry (15 person vessel only) $ 200K

Roundabout (at Sunrise Blvd. and Federal Hwy.)

* Diameter ranging from 375 ft to 475 ft (area = 2.5 to 4 acres) $3.0 to $6.0 M

Community, Neigborhood and Pocket Parks (10.5 acres) $8.5 to $14.2 M Improved Stranahan Park (1.72 acres) $700k to $1.9 MTypical Streetscape Improvements (400 ft long section) $325K to $575KGateway Projects (includes 4 gateways) $250K to $1 M

NOTES: 

All estimates represent only design and construction costs and do not include land acquistion or R-O-W costs. 

List of Typical Major Capital Project Costs

Downtown Fort Lauderdale Master Plan

All estimates shown are based on experiential knowledge and research of similar projects.Gateways can include: a variety of architectural features and landscaping.All estimates are based on 2003 dollars.All calculations are for planning purposes only and are not based on preliminary design costs.Typical park improvements can include: lighting, plazas, landscaping, art, and play equipment where applicable.Typical streetscape improvements can include: street trees, enhanced lighting, sidewalks, furnishings and landscaping.Roundabout features are limited to: roadway, landscaping and architectural treaments.

APITAL COST ANALYSIS

of specific

aster Plan.

or utilities,

ed or pro

cies. The

xamples of

ement the

ied in var

ncepts for

blic agen

plans. The

be accom

public and

ELLIOTT KEY

GOLDEN

BEACH

SUNNY

ISLES

BEACH

MIAMI SHORES

BAL HARBOUR

BAY

HARBOR

ISLANDS

SURFSIDE INDIAN

CREEK

NORTH

BAY

VILLAGE

MIAMI BEACH

KEY BISCAYNE

FLORIDA CITY

HOMESTEAD

PALMETTO BAY

PINECREST

WEST MIAMI

SWEETWATER

MEDLEY

HIALEAH

GARDENS

OPA

LOCKA

NORTH

MIAMI

BISCAYNE

PARK

NORTH

MIAMI

BEACH

AVENTURA

HIALEAH

MIAMI

EL PORTAL

MIAMI SPRINGS

CORAL GABLES

SOUTH MIAMI

BLACK CREEK CANAL

SNAKE CREEK CANAL

ARSENICKER KEYS

AMELIA EARHART

PARK

DINNER KEY

BISCAYNE NATIONAL PARK

INTERCOASTAL

WATERWAY

RAGGED KEYS

KENDALL-TAMIAMI

EXECUTIVE AIRPORT

OPA-LOCKA

WEST

AIRPORT

MIAMI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

DEERING ESTATES

OPA-LOCKA

AIRPORT

EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK

HOMESTEAD AIR

RESERVE BASE

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY

MONROE COUNTY

TURKEY POINT

KEY LARGO

CRANDON PARK

HAULOVER

PARK

FIU/BUENA

VISTA

LARRY & PENNY

THOMPSON PARK

METROZOO

SNAPPER CREEK CANAL

L-31E

CHAPMAN

FIELD PARK

CHICKEN KEY

SANDS KEY

BROWARD COUNTY

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY

TRAIL GLADES

RANGE

NORTHWEST

WELLFIELD

TAMIAMI CANAL (C-4)

TURKEY POINT

WILDNERNESS PRESERVE

OLETA RIVER

STATE PARK

FISHER ISLAND

LEVEE-31W

HOMESTEAD

GENERAL

AVIATION

AIRPORT

C-111

FIU

MATHESON HAMMOCK PARK

BILL BAGGS

CAPE FLORIDA STATE PARK

VIRGINIA KEY

LEVEE-31N

HOMESTEAD BAYFRONT PARK

BLACK POINT PARK

INTERCOASTAL WATERWAY

MDOC

NORTH

SW 168 ST

SW 136 ST

K

R

O

M

E

AV

E

SW 72 ST

S

W 14

7

A

V

E

OLD CUTLER

RD

NW 7 ST

NW 46 ST

N

W

2

AV

E

SW 360 ST

SW 344 ST

S

W

2

0

7

A

V

E

S

W 18

7

A

V

E

SW 264 ST

SW 56 ST

W OKEECHOBEE RD

NW 41 ST

NW 138 ST

N

W 117

AV

E

NW 186 ST

N

W 10

7

AV

E

I 7

5

S

R

8

2

6

E

X

T

N

W

6

7

A

V

E

N KENDALL DR

N

W

4

7

AV

E

N

W

2

2

AV

E

112 HWY

W

D I X I E

H W Y

I 9

5

LEHMAN CSWY

SW 232 ST

SW 120 ST

S

W 12

7

A

V

E

S

W 112

A

V

E

SW 40 ST

US

1

G

RA

N

A

D

A

B

L

V

D

NW 54 ST

I 195

MAC ARTHUR CSWY

NE 163 ST

BROAD

CSWY

C

O

L

L

NI S

AV

E

SW 320 ST

SW 304 ST

SW 42 ST

SW 8 ST

NW 74 ST

NW 106 ST

S

W 117

AV

E

NW 170 ST

N

W

7

7

A

V

E

OLD CUTLER RD

S

W

7

2

AV

E

N

W

5

7

AV

E

N

W 12

AV

E

RICKENBACKER

CSWY

N

E 10

AV

E

SW 328 ST

SW 280 ST

SW 152 ST

US

1

SW 104 ST

SW 26 ST

NW 25 ST

SR 874 EXT

S

W 10

7

AV

E

SNAPPER CREEK EXT

N

W

8

7

A

V

E

SOUTH

DIXIE

HWY

NW 202 ST

NW 36 ST

N

W

3

7

AV

E

SR 83 6 EXT

N

W

3

2

AV

E

N

W

7

AV

E

N

M

AI MI AV

E

VENETIAN CSWY

N

E

6

AV

E

N

E 12

AV

E

IVES DAIRY RD

U

S 1

SW 312 ST

S

W 19

7

A

V

E

SW 248 ST

SW 184 ST

SW 268 ST

S

W 15

7

A

V

E

NW 58 ST

NW 90 ST

S

W

9

7

AV

E

N

W

9

7

A

V

E

S

W

8

7

AV

E

SR 826 EXT

E

8

A

V

E

F

L

O

R

DI A

T

P

K

E

N

W

2

AV

E

US

1

S

W

217

A

V

E

SW 296 ST

TAMIAMI TRL

OLD CARD SOUND RD

S

W 16

7

A

V

E

SW 288 ST

U

S

2

7

SR 821 EXT

S

W 13

7

A

V

E

SW 112 ST

SW 24 ST

S

R

8

2

6

E

X

T

W FLAGLER ST

GRATIGNY

PKY

N

W

2

7

AV

E

NW 62 ST

N

W 17

AV

SR 9 EXT

NE 167 ST

PORT BLVD

BISCAYNE BLVD

W

D

XI EI

H

WY

S

W 17

7

A

V

E

SW 216 ST

SW 200 ST

SW 88 ST

NW 154 ST

FLORIDA TPKE

S

W

6

7

AV

E

S

W

5

7

AV

E

I 395 EXT

N

E

2

AV

E

JULIA TUTTLE CSWY

79 STCY

MIAMIDADE

COUNTY

DEPARTMENT OF

PLANNING AND ZONING

0 0.4 0.8 1.6 2.4

Miles

COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN

ADOPTED 2015-2025

* THIS PLAN IS NOT A ZONING MAP ! Within each map category on this plan map, numerous land uses, zoning

districts and housing types may occur. This plan map may be interpreted only as provided in the adopted plan text entitled

"Interpretation of The Land Use Plan Map: Adopted Policy Of The Land Use Element." That adopted text provides necessary

definitions and standards for allowable land uses, densities or intensities of use for each map category, and for interpretation

and application of the plan as a whole. The adopted text must be consulted in its entirety in interpreting any one plan map category, and

no provision shall be used in isolation from the remainder. Restrictions accepted by the Board of County Commissioners in association with

Land Use Plan map amendments shall be considered as an adopted part of the Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) and are

delineated in the adopted text.

This Land Use Plan (LUP) map, in conjunction with all other adopted components of the CDMP, will govern all development-related

actions taken or authorized by Miami-Dade County. The LUP map generally reflects municipal land use policies adopted

in comprehensive plans. However, with limited exceptions enumerated in the Statement of Legislative Intent, this plan does

not supersede local land use authority of incorporated municipal governments authorized in accordance with the Miami-Dade County

Charter. For further guidance on future land uses authorized within incorporated municipalities, consult the local comprehensive plan

adopted by the pertinent municipality.

NOTICE: The original true and correct copy of the official Land Use Plan map is maintained by the Director of the Department

of Planning and Zoning. This is a reproduction. Any question regarding information shown on this reproduction shall be

resolved by reference to the origial.

EVERGLADES

NATIONAL

PARK

WATER

CONSERVATION

AREA NO.3

BIG CYPRESS

PRESERVE

ENTIRE COUNTY MAP

Carlos Gimenez Mayor

Board of County Commissioners

Joe A. Martinez

Chairperson

Audrey M. Edmonson

Vice Chairman

Barbara J. Jordan Lynda Bell

District 1 District 8

Jean Monestime Dennis C. Moss

District 2 District 9

Audrey M. Edmonson Sen. Javier D. Souto

District 3 District 10

Sally A. Heyman Joe A. Martinez

District 4 District 11

Bruno A. Barreiro Jose "Pepe" Diaz

District 5 District 12

Rebeca Sosa Esteban Bovo, Jr.

District 6 District 13

Xavier Suarez

District 7

Alina T. HudakA

County Manager

R. A. Cuevas, Jr.

County Attorney

Prepared by the Department of Planning and Zoning

Marc LaFerrier, Director

Miami-Dade County provides equal access and equal opportunity in employment and

services and does not discriminate on the basis of disability.

Updated Thru July 2011

THIS MAP INCORPORATES

AMENDMENTS ADOPTED THROUGH:

AMENDMENT CYCLE

October 2005-06

ADOPTION DATE

Oct. 4, 2006

April 2005-06

April 2004-05

October 2004-05

October 2003-04

April 2003-04

April 2002-03

October 2001-02

Beacon Lakes DRI

April 2001-02

April 19, 2006

May 9, 2005

Dec. 12, 2005

Oct. 21, 2004

April 10, 2003

May 5, 2004

Oct. 10, 2002

May 30, 2002

May 9 & 30, 2002

April 2006-07 March 28, 2007

April 2007-08

Beacon Lakes DRI (2)

Metrozoo DRI July 3, 2008

July 17, 2008

April 24, 2008

October 2007-08 Nov. 20, 2008

April 2008-09 May 6, 2009

April 2009-10

October 2009-10

April 28, 2010

October 6, 2010

April 2010-11 July 27, 2011

October 2010-11 May 18, 2011

HIGH DENSITY (HDR) 60-125 DU/AC OR MORE/GROSS AC

0 0.4 0.8 1.6 2.4

W MilesATER

2015 URBAN DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY

2025 EXPANSION AREA BOUNDARY

CANAL

LEVEE/CANAL

EXISTING RAPID TRANSIT / FUTURE RAPID TRANSIT

EXPRESSWAYS

MAJOR ROADWAYS (3 OR MORE LANES)

MINOR ROADWAYS (2 LANES)

ADOPTED 2015 AND 2025

LAND USE PLAN *

FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA

RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES

ESTATE DENSITY (EDR) 1-2.5 DU/AC

LOW DENSITY (LDR) 2.5-6 DU/AC

LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY (LMDR) 6-13 DU/AC

MEDIUM DENSITY (MDR) 13-25 DU/AC

MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY (MHDR) 25-60 DU/AC

ESTATE DENSITY W/ ONE DENSITY INCREASE (DI-1)

LOW DENSITY W/ ONE DENSITY INCREASE (DI-1)

LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY W/ ONE DENSITY INCREASE (DI-1)

MEDIUM DENSITY W/ ONE DENSITY INCREASE (DI-1)

TWO DENSITY INCREASE WITH URBAN DESIGN (DI-2)

* * Note: This symbol denotes an urban center where an area plan has been accepted

by the Board of County Commissioners and codified in a zoning overlay district

that shows the defined boundaries of the center.

ADOPTED REGIONAL URBAN CTR

ADOPTED METROPOLITAN URBAN CTR

ADOPTED COMMUNITY URBAN CTR

URBAN CENTERS * *

REGIONAL

METROPOLITAN

COMMUNITY

TRANSPORTATION (ROW, RAIL, METRORAIL, ETC.)

TERMINALS

INDUSTRIAL AND OFFICE

RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL AND OFFICE

BUSINESS AND OFFICE

OFFICE/RESIDENTIAL

INSTITUTIONS UTILITIES, AND COMMUNICATIONS

PARKS AND RECREATION

AGRICULTURE

OPEN LAND

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

ENVIRONMENTALLY PROTECTED PARKS

ZOO MIAMI ENTERTAINMENT AREA
June 28, 2012
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

 One City, One Future 

 TABLE OF CONTENTS 

 

PREFACE 

Capital Budget Message 

How to Read this Document

1. INTRODUCTION 

Purpose............................................................................................1 

CIP Development Process.......................................................................1 

Prioritization Criteria............................................................................4 

Capital Plan Framework.........................................................................5 

2011-2012 Multi-Year Capital Plan Program Overview...................................6 

 

2. HIGHLIGHTS 

Highlights by Fund..............................................................................7 

3. FUNDING OVERVIEW 

Funding Sources...............................................................................14 

Funded, Partially Funded and Unfunded....................................................16 

Discussion on Miami Trolley.................................................................17 

Section Reports: 

1-Funding Type by Job........................................................................21 

2-Fund by Cost Component and Funding Source.........................................39 

3-Cost Estimates vs. Available Funding....................................................55 

APPENDIX 

Alphabetical Project Index....................................................................70 

List of Completed Projects in FY2010-2011...............................................87 
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

______________________________________________________________________

CAPITAL BUDGET MESSAGE 

CITY of MIAMI, FLORIDA 

 Tomas P. Regalado Johnny Martinez, PE 

Mayor Chief Administrator / City Manager 

Together with the City Commission, we are pleased to present the 2011-2012 Capital Improvements 

Program and Multi-Year Capital Plan – the CIP. 

We continue to utilize a capital planning process that gives City government an effective, service and 

result-oriented program to focus on meeting the needs and quality of life of our residents and visitors, as 

well as positioning the City for future growth. The preservation, management and utilization of these 

significant capital resources, both physical and fiscal, are the foundation on which we build the Miami 

of today and the future, which is the heart of South Florida, and the gateway to the rest of the Country. 

As a result of the City Commission’s past approval of the CIP, the Capital Improvements Department has 

either completed or will complete during this year a number of projects that significantly improve the 

quality of life of residents and visitors. These projects include the Brickell Key Bridge Rehabilitation 

Project, Launch of the Miami Trolley Program in the Health District and Brickell/Biscayne Areas, Marlins 

Stadium Parking Garages, NE 2 Ave Improvements, Williams Park, US-1 Privacy Wall. 

Under the guidance of Miami’s elected officials, capital improvements are once again based on core 

planning principles and fundamental urban needs: infrastructure, transportation and quality of life. This 

Plan shows the City’s continued commitment to positively impact the lives and well-being of its residents 

and visitors by improving, enhancing and expanding the streets on which we travel, the paths on which we 

walk, the parks where we play, the arts and social facilities to support our culture, the fire and police 

facilities that keep us safe, and the infrastructure that maintains our environment, with the ultimate intent of 

enhancing the neighborhoods and commercial corridors that are the cornerstones of our community.

In building upon the improvements of the last few years, the City Administration has set up a well-qualified 

workforce of architects, engineers, construction managers, and financial managers in the Department of 

Capital Improvements. They administer, manage and implement our capital and transportation programs, 

with all City Departments playing integral roles. The CIP contains individual capital projects that are 

organized by fund and programmed for the current fiscal year and into the next five years. Revenue has 

been analyzed and projected for future years, then assigned to those projects and needs that take 

precedence. 
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

______________________________________________________________________

The CIP, as presented, has been updated and revised to best address all of the currently identified needs in 

the City within the limitations of the available funding revenues. The CIP by nature is a dynamic, evolving 

document that will continually be refined as each of the projects within the program advances. This most 

likely will include projects moving in and out of the years in which they are programmed, as well as the 

introduction of new projects and possibly the modification or elimination of others. As City priorities, 

project scopes of work, cost estimates and production schedules are advanced, the CIP will be modified to 

reflect any necessary changes. It is in this context that we respectfully request your approval of the CIP 

presented before you.

To greater emphasize the role of these improvements in shaping the Miami of the future, the Capital 

Improvements and Transportation offices continue with their sole purpose of planning, coordinating, 

executing and monitoring capital projects and the expenditure of capital funds. This department has a clear 

mandate to work with staff from other departments, the Administration and City officials to develop and 

implement a Capital Program that balances key community needs, policy directives, and the physical 

condition of assets and facilities. To that end, the Department is finding innovative ways to speed the 

delivery of these improvements to the public.

With revenue sources such as the Homeland Defense/Neighborhood Improvement Bonds, Streets Bond, 

Parking Surcharge, updated City Impact Fee Ordinance and the County’s Transit Surtax and General 

Obligation Bond, the resources are all in place for the continued physical renewal of the City of Miami.
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

HOW TO READ THIS DOCUMENT

This document contains the City of Miami’s six-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) that runs from October 1, 

2011 through September 30, 2017. The document is organized into the five sections described below. 

INTRODUCTION – The Introduction defines the purpose of the CIP and details the Plan development process. 

This section contains the following six parts:

Purpose of the Capital Improvement Plan provides a thorough explanation of the purpose of the Capital 

Plan with a detailed description of the difference between capital and operating budget and the legal 

authority given to the City for the preparation of the Plan via several City and State of Florida statutes.

CIP Development Process describes the efforts of the Department of Capital Improvement Program in the 

delivery of the projects and the adjustments to the project funding allocation.

Prioritization Criteria detailed description of the method used to establish the criteria by which the projects 

are considered for funding.

Capital Plan Framework shows the eleven distinct funds or program used to establish the Capital Plan 

2011-2012 Multi-Year Capital Plan Overview shows the distinct funds into which the Multi Year Capital 

Plan is organized. It also shows a pie chart of the Funding Summary by fund.

HIGHLIGHTS – During the fiscal year CIP and other City of Miami departments work on hundreds of projects. 

This section describes those projects that are noteworthy because of their magnitude or impact to the community, 

priority in meeting the City’s strategic plan, or innovative qualities. The highlighted projects are presented 

according to capital fund category.

FUNDING OVERVIEW –This section begins by describing the seven types of revenue sources: Federal Grants, 

State Grants, Miami-Dade County Grants, Other Grant, City Bonds, CIP Fees/Revenues, Private Donation 

/Other. These revenue sources are the funding vehicles for the Capital Improvement Plan. The funding status for 

the CIP projects can be further described by three categories: Funded, Partially Funded or Unfunded. Several 

reports at the end of the section identify the projects and the funding situation. This section also contains 

discussions on significant bond issuance initiatives and the Miami Trolley project.

APPENDIX – Additional information helpful to understanding the Capital Plan, including an alphabetical project 

index and, lists of completed and unfunded projects, are contained in the Appendix.
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

 

1. INTRODUCTION 
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

 

INTRODUCTION 

Purpose of the Capital Improvement Plan

The Multi-Year Capital Plan (the Capital Improvement Plan or CIP) is an official statement of public policy 

regarding long-range physical development in the City of Miami. A capital improvement is defined as a 

capital or “in-kind “expenditure of $5,000 or more, resulting in the acquisition, improvement or addition to 

fixed assets in the form of land, buildings or improvements, more or less permanent in character, and durable 

equipment with a life expectancy of at least three years. The Capital Plan is a proposed funding schedule for 

six years, updated annually to add new projects, reevaluate project priorities and revise recommendations, 

with the first year of the plan being the Capital Budget. 

The Capital Budget

Miami’s Capital Budget is distinct from the Operating Budget. The Capital Budget represents a legal 

authorization to spend, during the first year of the plan, funds from Federal, State and various other sources 

and is adopted separately from the six year plan by means of an appropriations resolution. The Capital 

Budget authorizes capital expenditures while the Operating Budget authorizes the expenditure of funds for 

employee salaries and the purchase of supplies and small equipment. Capital projects can have an impact on 

the operating budget through additional costs, revenues or cost savings. 

Legal Authority 

Legal requirements for preparing Miami’s Capital Plan are set forth in the Florida Statutes and the City of 

Miami Code. A capital improvement programming process to support the Comprehensive Plan is required 

by the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, more 

particularly, Section 163.3177 of the Florida Statutes (2005). Further, the Financial Integrity Ordinance, 

Chapter 18, Article IX / Division 2 of the City Code, requires the development and approval of a multi-year 

capital plan. 

CIP Development Process

The 2011-2012 Multi-Year Capital Plan is an update to the 2010-2011 Multi-Year Capital Plan which was 

approved by the City Commission on February 24th, 2011. The new FY11-12 Plan contains the same fund 

and program framework and project priorities as the prior Plan, but incorporates allocations for funding 

sources becoming available in FY2012. The primary focus of the Capital Improvements Program Office 

since the approval of the previous Plan has been the continued management of ongoing projects, initiation of 

previously approved projects, and coordination with the Finance Team to identify and secure financing 

opportunities. 

1
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

The efforts of the Capital Improvements Program/Transportation Office align with several objectives of the 

City’s Strategy Map and are summarized below. The Strategy Map can be seen on the next page. 

Provide Excellent Recreational, Educational & Cultural Programs – through frequent communication with 

the Parks and Recreation Department, continued implementation of high-priority parks capital projects 

including those identified in the Homeland Defense/Neighborhood Improvement Bond Program. 

Restore, Maintain & Beautify Urban & Residential Infrastructure – continued management of ongoing 

construction and design for street, traffic calming and drainage projects identified as top priorities through 

resident and elected official input, particularly those identified in the Street Bond Program. 

Foster Transportation Systems for Future Growth – The Transportation Office, through capital funding, 

continued the development of the Miami Trolley Program which began with initiation of the Health/Stadium 

District Route and the Brickell/Biscayne Route, and will be followed by the planed Overtown Route, 

Allapattah Route and the Coral Way Route. 

Provide Excellent Public Safety – through frequent communication with the Miami Police and Fire-Rescue 

Departments, continue to implement significant public safety projects including the construction of Fire 

Station 13 and the design of Fire Station 14. 

Improve Business and Service Delivery Processes – utilize resources made available through the Capital 

Program Support Services contract to develop project scopes and estimates, and facilitate progress of the 

Multi-Year Capital Plan. Further, the Capital Improvements Program Office seeks opportunities to develop 

alternate contracting methodologies, through pre-approved contracts with industry professionals, to expedite 

the large volume of projects in the Capital Plan. 

2
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

3
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

Prioritization Criteria

In addition to the surveying of all of CIP’s client departments to determine their capital project needs, CIP 

uses a hierarchy of criteria to determine how projects are considered for funding on a yearly basis. Projects 

with the highest rankings, or in the case of projects meeting more than one criterion, are given priority for 

funding and implementation. The criterion used is listed as follows in the order of priority: 

Life/Safety- These projects are normally related to structural issues at City facilities and demand immediate 

attention. They are considered “emergency” projects as they are not always planned for or funded. 

Legal Requirements- These projects are funded based on the need to comply with legally mandated 

requirements set forth by Federal, State and local governments. These types of projects may be required as a 

result of binding settlements with other governmental agencies to meet current codes, ordinances or health 

and safety issues. An example of these projects may be federally mandated compliance with ADA 

requirements either citywide or at a particular park or facility.

Essential Improvements- These types of projects demand funding for improvements necessary to the 

functioning and/ or preservation of facilities or infrastructure. This criterion measures the extent to which a 

facility or infrastructure has deteriorated and needs improvements relative to the overall condition of similar 

structures. Bridge repairs, storm water infrastructure improvements and repairs, and roadway resurfacing 

highlight a variety of public works related projects that would fall under this criterion. The majority of Street 

Bonds-funded projects would fall under this category as the preservation and improvement of the existing 

infrastructure is the overwhelming goal. Facility roof replacements, repairing of structural damage, and fire 

station renovations and replacement are also examples of essential facility improvements. 

Quality of Life Improvements- Projects of this type improve the overall quality of life for the residents of 

Miami. Projects such as these would include traffic calming, streetscapes, fountains, neighborhood and entry 

signs, and landscaping. 

Efficiency Improvements- This criterion measures those projects that when completed will increase 

efficiency or result in overall cost savings to the city. Such projects may benefit a greater number of people 

or more efficiently and effectively provide and support the defined functional requirements of the intended 

use. Projects such as these include renovation to offices, layout or workspace within a building, planning or 

zoning department where a smoother and more fluid processing of plans equates to time savings and 

increased customer service. 

Revenue Producing- These projects when completed would generate additional revenues to the city. 

Projects of this nature show an overall return on investments, and should be measured on the risk involved. 

The criterion measures the number of people who will benefit from the project, both directly and indirectly, 

and the associated costs versus revenues generated. Elements considered in the rating include the project type 

and overall community needs. Such a project might include a new park with a community center and water 

park. 

Service Improvements- These types of projects demonstrate an increased delivery capability when 

completed. This criterion measures the number of people served and the benefit derived from a project. 

Replacements and renewals, which bring facilities up to acceptable standards and expand capacity, such as a 

marina expansion and renovation are illustrations of these types of projects. 

Service/Space Expansion- These are projects which result in expansion of space to serve the needs of the 

community. Such projects, typically parks or public facilities, would include renovations, additions, 

expansions or new construction of recreation centers, fire stations, police facilities, theatres and convention 

centers. 

4
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

Capital Plan Framework

The 2011-2012 Multi-Year Capital Plan is structured into eleven (11) distinct funds or programs, some with 

subcategories. With the exception of the Funding Type by Job report, all reports in the Plan follow this 

program framework. The programs are listed and described below. 

 Community Redevelopment Area (CRA): This program accounts for the acquisition or 

construction of major capital facilities and infrastructure for community redevelopment in the 

defined Community Redevelopment Area. 

 General Government Projects: This program consists of capital improvements, including 

computers and communications, to the City of Miami’s municipal office buildings and operations 

facilities. 

 Public Safety: The Public Safety fund or program accounts for the acquisition of equipment or 

construction of major facilities that support the operations of the Police and Fire-Rescue 

Departments. 

 Disaster Recovery: The fund is utilized to account for revenue received from the Federal 

Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), insurance and other agencies resulting from declared 

disasters which required measures of relief in the areas of debris removal, roads and bridges, 

buildings and equipment, parks, marinas, and stadiums. At the present time, there are no disaster 

recovery projects planned or included in the FY11-12 Capital Plan. 

 Public Facilities: The Public Facilities program includes improvements to public use facilities such 

as stadiums, auditoriums and marinas. This fund also accounts for capital funding for redevelopment 

projects and historic preservation efforts. 

 Parks and Recreation: This program accounts for the acquisition, rehabilitation or construction of 

capital facilities for recreational activities. The City of Miami’s park system comprises over 100 

parks. 

 Streets and Sidewalks: The capital projects in the Streets and Sidewalks program provide 

reconstruction, major maintenance and beautification to Miami’s street system. 

 Mass Transit: This program accounts for the acquisition of equipment or construction of capital 

facilities that support the maintenance and operation of public transportation systems. 

 Sanitary Sewers: This program includes projects that will improve the City’s existing sanitary 

sewer system. 

 Storm Sewers: The Storm Sewer program accounts for projects that result in improved drainage 

throughout the City of Miami. 

 Solid Waste: This program includes projects for the acquisition of equipment or construction of 

facilities for the collection and removal of solid waste. 

5
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

Program Overview

The total value of the six-year plan is $411 million, representing 248 projects throughout the various 

programs. The following graph shows that the Streets and Sidewalks program accounts for the largest 

portion of the total Capital Plan funding at $127 million or 30.9%. The Parks and Recreation, the second 

largest, accounts for $85.3 million or 20.8% of the overall Plan value. The General Government program is 

the third largest fund accounting for $80.7 million, or 19.6% of the total Plan. 

6
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

 

 

2. HIGHLIGHTS 
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

 

HIGHLIGHTS 

Highlights by Fund

The most significant project accomplishments of the hundreds of projects under development in CIP and 

other City departments are highlighted in this section and grouped according to fund category. The 

projects that are noted in this section are deemed to be significant based on: 

 Scale or magnitude and/or anticipated impact to the community; 

 High priority alignment with the City’s Strategic Map;

 Accomplishment of a long standing need or objective; or, 

 Representation of an innovative solution to a problem. 

FUND 301 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA (CRA) 

NW 2nd Avenue Roadway Improvements – This project included the design, and construction of the 

needed improvements including but not limited to roadway reconstruction, pavement milling and 

resurfacing, repair of broken driveway approaches and sidewalk, new ADA compliant pedestrian ramps, 

and repair of curb and gutter as needed. NW 2nd Avenue is under the jurisdiction, Miami-Dade County 

Public Works. Project Location: The area bounded by NW 1st Avenue to NW 3rd Avenue from NW 10th 

Street to NW 14th Street. NW 10th and 11th Streets are not included.

NW 3rd Avenue Overtown Business Corridor Streetscape – Overtown is one of the oldest 

communities in the City and vital to the economic engine of Miami. This project consisted of the 

reconstruction of the roadway, sidewalk reconstruction, decorative lights, landscaping and hardscape of 

the corridor. Project Location: NW 3rd Avenue from NW 8th Street to NW 14th Street. 

Old Fire Station No. 2 Restoration - Design and construction to rehabilitate and restore the old Fire 

Station No. 2, a historic 1926 two story CBS structure approximately 10,500 SF (5,250 SF per floor). The 

work includes selective demolition, environmental cleanup, construction of new structural and roof 

systems, second floor, all new MEP including HVAC, new restrooms on both floors, restoration and 

installation of historical elements, exterior site work, ADA and code upgrades and related work. Design 

will be done in three phases. Ph. 1: Condition Assessment Report & Recommendations. Ph. 2: Design & 

Construction for strengthening of the structural systems and new roof. Ph. 3: Design and Construction of 

adaptive re-use. Design Phase of project is complete and construction is underway. Project location: 1401 

North Miami Avenue 

FUND 311 GENERAL GOVERNMENT IMPROVEMENTS 

Solid Waste Collection Equipment Upgrade – This project included the acquisition of new Hybrid 

Autocar Automated Side Loader, Rubbish Truck, Freightliner M2, and Commercial Grinder for Virginia 

Key Composting Facility. 

7
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

 

Communications/Technology: 

IT Modernization - The City continued the most far reaching technology modernization effort in its 

history. Legacy business systems are being replaced with new software applications offering modern 

technical designs to enable best business practices. The internet, high bandwidth and wireless 

telecommunication, geographic information systems, business intelligence databases, and modern desktop 

and server hardware form the foundation for a reliable, agile, technology infrastructure. 

Two major modernization efforts were the focal point of the Information Technology Department: 

iMiami ERP system including Oracle R12 upgrade and the Land Management System, each contribute 

directly to the accomplishment of City’s strategic objectives. 

Oracle R12 brings the latest version of the financials and human resources systems to the city along with 

improvements in business processes and computer processing speed. In addition, the team launched the 

implementation of Hyperion Budget and Planning system as well as Oracle Business Intelligence 

applications. 

FUND 312 PUBLIC SAFETY

Police: 

South Police Substation Hurricane Protection - The project consisted of providing hurricane protection 

for the windows and the circular main front entrance at the 2-story police substation. Project included the 

preparation of a design analysis report to retrofit the building with protective screening and impact 

resistant window/glass system. Project also included the purchase and Installation of a selected system 

based on the phase I report. Project Location: 2200 West Flagler Street 

Fire: 

Fire Station 13 - Design and construction of a New Fire Station facility of approximately 11,105 square 

feet Gross Area. The building shall be one story and two bay apparatus fire rescue facility. The facility 

shall include all typical fire station amenities for fire rescue personnel. The project shall include site 

development such as parking spaces as per zoning requirements, landscaping, water main improvement 

and street signalization. Seek LEED Silver Certification. The Project design was completed is currently in 

construction. Project Location: 958-960-990 NE 79 Street. 

Fire Station 11 – Completed the design and construction of approximately 11,749 square feet two stories 

and two bay apparatus fire rescue facility. The facility includes all typical fire station amenities for fire 

rescue personnel plus two lieutenants and a captain. The project included: allowance for demolition of an 

existing fire station and site development including parking spaces for 15-18 vehicles and landscaping; a 

water main improvement and new signalization. The project also included design and construction of a 

temporary site for firefighter relocation in two trailers with temporary signalization, electrical, water, 

sewer, fire truck parking area, some landscape, chainlink and wood fences for security. Project Location: 

5920 W Flagler Street 

Fire Stations 1, 6, 8 & 9 Emergency Generator Replacement – For Fire Stations 1, 6, 8 and 9, we 

completed design to replace the existing standby generator with a larger generator capable of providing 

emergency power to the entire facility. Provide other related code required upgrades such as larger louver 

vents, day tank, transfer switch and concrete pad. 

8
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

 

FUND 325 PUBLIC FACILITIES 

Stadium Parking Garage: The City of Miami is currently finalizing the constructing of the parking 

surface lot to serve the Florida Marlins Stadium. The project consists of four parking garages - two at six 

stories high and two at five stories high and six surface lots, along with retail space. The parking garages 

are constructed using a standard foundation with spread footings, a precast joist system and cast in place 

decks. The parking garage walls consist of tilt-up precast construction. 

Marine Stadium Marina at Virginia Key - This type of marina facilities currently under design is for 

pleasure crafts. Fixed docks supported by concrete piles are proposed. The docks construction will utilize 

concrete, fiberglass decking and aluminum. This new marina will accommodate approximately 220 

vessels. In addition, upland utility improvements and an administration building of approximately 5,000 

sq. ft Gross Area to support marina activities and administration. Project Location: 3301 Rickenbacker 

Causeway 

Miamarina Piers A, B & C Fire Line Repairs – Completed the design to remove and replace 1,200 

linear feet of corroded iron pipe, and corresponding connections, fittings and support brackets below piers 

A, B and C. 

James L. Knight Center Chiller & Cooling Tower – This project currently under construction consists 

of removing and replacing four Chillers and all related pumps, piping and electrical work at the James L. 

Knight Center. The project also includes the Demolition of the existing cooling tower and replacing it 

with new cooling tower assembly. Project Location: 400 SE 2nd Avenue. 

Historic Preservation: 

Gusman Center – The Gusman Center housing the Olympia Theater has been one of Miami’s beloved 

cultural centers since 1926. Tucked into Miami’s contemporary skyline is an enchanting Mediterranean 

courtyard with shimmering stars and golden balconies. Majestic turrets and towers suggest another era 

when performances were events, and grand theaters provided a dreamlike escape from the modern world. 

The Olympia Theater at the Gusman Center for the Performing Arts is not just a “venue” – is the jewel of 

South Florida arts and entertainment facilities, affording South Florida’s diverse community and its 

international guests a unique cultural experience that defies comparison. As such, the City of Miami 

plans to implement major renovations to the theater to rehabilitate the structure and upgrade it to have 

state of the art equipment. 

FUND 331 PARKS AND RECREATION 

1814 Brickell Avenue Park Land Acquisition and site development - Acquisition of property located 

at 1814 Brickell Avenue for park land purposes. The project will consist of permitting and construction of 

a new park on a 35,500 SF property. The program includes landscaped areas an elevated landscaped court 

and a children's play area. Scope includes landscaping consisting of groundcover, shrubs and mature 

trees, decorative concrete hardscaping, benches, picket fencing, site drainage, irrigation and lighting. The 

park will also house the City’s 9/11 memorial.

Duarte Park ADA Modifications – The scope of work was comprised of several phases. At the Parking 

Lot: providing accessible parking spaces and access aisle. At the Recreational Building: replacing the 

entrance door knob hardware with accessible lever operated hardware at the Computer room. At women's 

and men's bathrooms: Providing permanent ADA signage, grab bars at handicap stalls, paper towel 

dispensers and at the women's only replace the toilet flush control on the open side of the toilet's clear 

space. At the recreation area: replacing the drinking fountain with hi-low accessible drinking fountain. 

9
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

 

At the Pavilion area: providing an accessible picnic table. At the Field house restrooms: providing ADA 

permanent signage, accessible stalls, replacing all bathroom accessories, replacing all plumbing fixtures 

and adjusting plumbing rough accordingly replace entry door with accessible door and hardware. At the 

Field: relocating and replacing drinking fountain with Hi-Lo accessible drinking fountain and providing 

an accessible route from the Field House to the Basketball and Baseball bleachers. Project Location: 1700 

NW 28th Street aka 2800 NW 17th Avenue. 

Juan Pablo Duarte Park - Provided one van accessible space and one standard H/C space. Scope of 

work also included: providing an accessible route from the baseball field bleachers to the existing Field 

House, and Renovating existing standalone restroom to meet ADA compliance. Restroom repairs within 

the Recreation Building. Project Location: 2800 NW 17th Avenue. 

Curtis Park ADA Modifications – This multi-phase project included: Providing at restrooms of 

Recreation Building, Concessions Building and Stadium Building permanent accessible rooms signage, 

accessible accessories and flush valves, also insulation for hot water pipes. At parking areas: providing 

accessible parking spaces with access aisle. Also included in the scope was providing accessible door 

entrance, water coolers and walkway to accessible chess table. Project Location: 1901 NW 24th Street 

Bicentennial / Museum Park Mooring Bollards - Designed and installed ship bollards for Bicentennial 

Park on the north side of FEC slip. These improvements will allow for the mooring of tall ships and 

historical sailing vessels. In addition the facility can be used to host competitive sailing evens such at the 

Volvo Ocean Race in May of 2012. 

Gibson Park – This major project currently under construction includes the demolition of existing park 

facilities including Recreation Building, play courts, pool and utility building. The project will provide 

new sports field with artificial turf, upgraded sports lighting, 1,000 seat covered bleachers and press box. 

Also included will be a new Aquatic Center with new pool, restrooms, showers, lockers and new pump 

building; the construction a new Recreation Building with administrative and fitness spaces; a new open 

park area with pavilions, play areas and other park amenities. A new covered walkway will connect the 

Recreation Building to the existing Library. The project is to meet LEED Silver standards. Project also 

includes Street Improvements to address existing roadway conditions around the park; the reconstruction 

of NW 12th Street with new drop-off area, parking and landscaping. 

Orange Bowl Committee Athletic Field at Moore Park - To commemorate its 75th anniversary the 

Orange Bowl Committee proposed to build with the City of Miami a youth sports/high school football 

stadium at Moore Park, the place where the tradition of the Orange Bowl game was born. The new facility 

includes football field of synthetic turf, running track with facilities for track & field events, electronic 

score board, field sports lighting, 1,500-seat aluminum bleachers, 6,000 sf building with restrooms, 

clubrooms, concession area for home and visitor teams, in addition to ticket booth, storage spaces and 

press box with PA system. 

Roberto Clemente Park – The project consisted of the furnishing of all labor, materials and equipment 

for a new Recreation Building of approximately 9,000 sq. ft. (Gross Area) at Roberto Clemente Park. The 

new building has spaces for Neighborhood Enhancement Team (NET) that includes two staff offices, one 

large open office, and reception area. The new building also has the Parks Department spaces such as art 

and craft room/homework room, computer room for 8 to 12 stations, multipurpose rooms, children room 

and warming kitchen and staff office. The shared areas are the conference room for 8 to 10 people, the 

staff room and the public rooms for approximately 300 kids during summer programs, electrical room, 

pump room, maintenance storage, covered terrace, playground area and water playground area. Project 

Location: 101 NW 34th Street. 

10
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

 

Coral Gate Park Community Building - The project consists of furnishing of all labor, material and 

equipment for the construction of a new community building of approximately 4,600 G.S.F. Also, the 

project includes a new parking lot, landscape, irrigation, demolition of existing building, new playground 

and utility on site for services. Seek LEED Silver Certification. The construction of the project is almost 

complete. Project location: 1415 SW 32 Avenue. 

Williams Park Community Center – The project consisted of demolishing the existing 2,500 SF 

community center and constructing a new community center (approximately 5,000 SF) with three 

multipurpose rooms, an art and crafts room, a computer room, a manager's office, public restrooms and 

various support spaces. Project also included remodeled portions of the walkways and bleachers to satisfy 

accessibility requirements; remodeling the pool building restrooms/shower rooms to satisfy accessibility 

requirements and provide a year-round changing facility and, remodeling a portion of the site surrounding 

the new community center and parking area to remediate drainage problems. The project is to be LEED 

Silver. Project Location: 1717 NW 5 Avenue. 

FUND 341 STREETS AND SIDEWALKS 

NE 2 Avenue Improvements – Provide all project management and engineering analysis and design 

services necessary for preparing construction documents for the reconstruction of NE 2nd Avenue from 

NE 20th Street to NE 84th Street. The project length is approximately 4.1 miles. The scope of work 

includes roadway reconstruction, storm water system, curb and gutter, concrete sidewalk, signing and 

pavement markings, decorative lighting, signalization and landscape. Segment B1 (NE 36 Street to NE 42 

Street) is completed, Segments B2 (NE 42 Street to NE 57 Street) and C (NE 57 Street to NE 69 Street) 

are currently under construction and Segments A (NE 20 Street to NE 36 Street), B3 (NE 42 Street to NE 

51 Street) and D (NE 69 Street to NE 84 Street) are currently under design. 

Brickell Key Bridge Rehabilitation Project - The purpose of this service was to provide structural 

inspection, survey, design of repairs, detailed construction plans, technical special provisions, prepare 

permit packages, cost estimates, utility coordination, FRI's and RAFs, shop drawing reviews and 

reviewing proposed repair products. 

NW N. River Dr. 22nd Ave.-24th Ave - Milling and resurfacing including re-striping. In addition, scope 

included reconstruction of approximately 200 linear feet of roadway with one new inlet and 50 L.F. of 

french drain. 

NW 2nd Avenue Roadway Improvements - This project includes the design, and construction of the 

needed improvements including but not limited to roadway reconstruction, pavement milling and 

resurfacing, repair of broken driveway approaches and sidewalk, new ADA compliant pedestrian ramps, 

and repair of curb and gutter as needed. NW 2nd Avenue is under the jurisdiction Miami-Dade County 

Public Works. Project Location: area bounded by NW 1st Avenue to NW 3rd Avenue from NW 10th 

Street to NW 14th Street. NW 10th and 11th Streets are not included. 

NW 17 Avenue between NW 3rd and NW 1st Street – Installation of Guardrail to increase pedestrian 

safety along this busy corridor. 

Traffic Calming – Studies were performed for various neighborhoods within the City. As a result, a 

variety of traffic calming devices such as but not limited to traffic circles, chokers, medians and 

intersection improvements were recommended to address speeding and cut through traffic as well as to 

11
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

 

improve overall quality of life in our residential neighborhoods. Traffic calming circles or other calming 

devices have been completed or will begin construction throughout the city. 

Downtown Street Infrastructure – This infrastructure project addresses the need to restore long 

neglected street infrastructure in Downtown Miami. The project includes milling and resurfacing of the 

existing roads, replacement of sidewalks and curbing, addition of ADA compliant pedestrian ramps, and 

lining of existing storm sewer pipes. 

US 1 (Pink Wall) Replacement – Phase II – Following the successful completion of Phase 1 between 

17th Avenue to the Planetarium on the east side of US 1 (a distance of some 3,100 ft.), the City of Miami 

is finalizing Phase II of the project between 17th Avenue and just west of Natoma Street (19th Avenue). 

The scope of this project included the demolition and removal of the existing privacy fence/wall, 

installation of a concrete post and panel type wall, barrier wall installation, drainage, landscaping, and 

minor roadway improvements. 

FUND 343 MASS TRANSIT 

City of Miami Trolley Program - Capital Acquisition – The City of Miami with federal funding from 

the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009, funding from the Florida Department of 

Transportation (FDOT) and city funds, acquired rubber-tire circulator/shuttle to operate several routes 

within the City boundaries to serve its constituents and visitors alike. 

Trolley Program – Operation and Maintenance - The City of Miami has been awarded transit service 

development funding by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for this project. The state 

funds are intended to off-set 50% of the operating and maintenance costs associated with the first three 

years of service. The City’s match will originate from the transit portion of the transportation halfcent surtax proceeds. The following are the implemented and/or proposed routes: 

 Health District, Health District/Stadium - Launched March 2012 

 Brickell/Biscayne – Launched April 2012 

 Overtown/Health District – Scheduled for July 2012 

 Coral Way Circulator - Scheduled for Winter 2012/2013 

 Allapatah/Overtown Circulator – Scheduled for Winter 2012/2013 

FUND 352 STORM SEWERS 

Englewood Road and Storm Sewer Improvements - The new drainage facilities may consist of a 

combination of exfiltration drains, deep drainage wells, grease & oil interceptors and other pollution 

control structures. Road improvements include milling and resurfacing, new or repair sidewalks, curb and 

gutter, ADA ramps, re-grade or re-sodding swale areas, repair or replace damaged or disfigured traffic 

signs, and tree planting. The design phase of the project is completed and included the preparation of a 

General Development Report which evaluated the existing road and drainage conditions, developed

alternative improvements and cost estimates, and recommended a preferred alternative. The construction 

of the project is scheduled to begin in the Fall. Project Location: Area generally bounded by SW 16th St, 

SW 27th Avenue, SW 22nd St, and SW 32nd Avenue. and includes traffic circles at SW 30 avenue/16 

terrace, SW 31avenue/18 street, SW 31st Avenue/19th street, SW 29 avenue/18 street, SW 29 avenue/19 

street Raised Crosswalk at SW 20 street between 27th avenue and 32nd avenue. 

North Bayshore Drainage (Partially Funded by CRA) – This project was part of the Omni CRA 

initiative to develop drainage alternatives to address the existing flooding & roadway conditions. 

12
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

 

Improvements under study include the design and construction of a new storm sewer pump station; the 

rebuilding of the intersection @ N Bayshore Dr & NE 18 St; and new pavement @ N Bayshore Dr, 

between NE 17 & 18 Street 

Northwest Road and Storm Sewers Improvements – Design and construction of a storm sewer system 

including: road improvements such as damaged sidewalk replacement, damaged curb and / or gutter 

replacement, ADA compliant ramp construction, re-sod of swales, milling & resurfacing. The project is 

currently under construction. Project Location: Area generally bounded by NW 71st St, NW 7th Ave, 

NW 62nd St, and NW 12th Ave. 

Fairlawn Storm Sewer Improvements Project Phase III – The project consisted of the construction of 

a storm sewer system, road improvements such as damaged sidewalk replacement, damaged curb and / or 

gutter replacement, ADA compliant ramp construction, re-sod of swales, milling & resurfacing. Project 

location: selected roads bounded by W. Flagler Street to SW 8th Street, SW 47th Avenue to SW 57th 

Avenue. 

Kinloch Storm Sewer Improvements Project - This project consists of three parts: 

(1) The General Development Report (GDR) to address flooding problems within the limits of the project. 

This comprehensive report serves as a plan to design drainage systems to reduce flooding in these 

communities. It also identified contributing factors to the flooding conditions, evaluated feasible measures 

to reduce flood stages, established drainage requirements, and provided specific recommendations to 

improve drainage conditions within the project limits. This phase of the project is completed. 

(2) Phase I Design and Construction: consists of exfiltration trenches, manholes, inlets, cross drains, 

swale trenches, and surface restoration. This phase of the project is constructed. 

(3) Phase II Design and Construction: consists of a connection to an existing outfall, old exfiltration 

trenches will be replaced with new ones, manholes, inlets, swale trenches and surface restoration. This 

phase of the project is currently under design. 

Road improvements for both phases include roadway milling & resurfacing, ADA Ramps, damaged 

sidewalk and curb and/or gutter replacement and swale restoration on street blocks impacted by the 

drainage construction. Project Location: Area bounded by SW/NW 42 Avenue, SW/NW 47 Avenue, NW 

7 Street, and SW 8 Street; and NW 43rd Avenue from Flagler to 4th Terrace. 

FUND 353 SOLID WASTE 

Solid Waste Equipment Acquisition –The Solid Waste Department continues to purchase a large variety 

of equipment, including Street Sweepers, Roll-Off Transfer Trucks, Litter Containers, Side Loader 

Compactor Waste Collection Vehicles, and Rear Load Waste Collection Vehicles. This new equipment 

will improve the efficiency of garbage and trash pickup within the City as well as help insure a clean city 

for our residents and visitors. 

13
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

 

3. FUNDING OVERVIEW 
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

 

FUNDING OVERVIEW

Funding Sources

The Capital Improvement Plan contains funding from seven types of revenue sources: 

 Federal Grants - Federal grants, such as Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), may be 

used only for the purposes specified in Federal laws. The amount of funding available from Federal 

sources is dedicated by National priorities. These grants derive from agencies at the federal level 

such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and Housing and Urban Development 

(HUD). 

 State Grants - State grants are awarded by State of Florida agencies such as the Florida Department 

of Transportation (FDOT) and Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). These grants 

may be used only for the purposes specified in State laws. 

 Miami-Dade County Grants - Miami-Dade County may contribute funding in the form of a grant 

for specific projects to be undertaken by the City. 

 Grant – Other - These are grants which do not derive from Federal, State or Miami-Dade County 

resources. An example of this funding type is a grant or contribution from another municipality. 

 City Bonds - Two types of bonds can be issued by the City for capital improvements: (1) General 

Obligation Bonds and (2) Special Obligation Bonds: 

 General obligation bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the City of Miami and are 

secured by the City’s ad valorem taxing power. These bonds finance specific capital 

improvement programs such as public safety, highway or storm sewers. The City’s most recent 

general obligation bond issuance was approved by voters in November 2001. These bonds, 

named the Homeland Defense/Neighborhood Improvement (HD) Bonds, provide for a total 

infusion of $255 million worth of capital investment in the areas of public safety, parks and 

recreation, streets, drainage, quality of life infrastructure improvements, and historic 

preservation. The first issuance in the amount of $155 million took place in 2002 while the 

second issuance took place in July 2007 and derived almost $51 million. The third issuance in 

the amount of $50,599,645 took place in May 2009. 

 Special obligation bonds are secured by a limited revenue source. 

 In order to accelerate the construction of much needed road and drainage 

infrastructure projects, the City leveraged recurring revenue streams from Local 

Option Gas Tax, the Transit Half-Cent Surtax, and the Parking Surcharge into a 

special obligation bond program. The first issuance of this bond program, known as 

the “Streets Bonds”, in the amount of $80 million took place at the end of calendar 

14
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

year 2007. The second issuance in the amount of $57,634,240 took place in 

December 2009. 

 In order to provide funds together with other available moneys, to finance the cost of 

construction of parking appurtenant and ancillary facilities, including retail space, 

surface lots and parking structures to the site adjacent to the Marlins Baseball 

Stadium, the City leveraged recurring revenue streams from Convention 

Development Tax, Parking Revenues and Parking Surcharge into a special 

obligation bond program. The issuance of this bond program, known as the “Marlins 

Stadium Project”, in the amount of $72.57 million of Tax-Exempt Special 

Obligation and $14.83 million of Taxable Special Obligation took place in July 

2010. 

 CIP Fees/Revenues - These funds are collected from current revenues produced by miscellaneous 

county or city taxes and various fees. Notable funding sources included in this category are the 

annual General Fund contribution to capital projects, storm water utility trust funds, local option 

gas tax, the transit 1⁄2 cent surtax, fire assessment fee, and impact fees. 

 Private Donation/Other - This funding source includes any private funds contributed to the City 

as well as the dedication or sale of land for capital facilities. 

The chart below shows that City Bonds represent the largest share of funding in the Capital Plan, accounting 

for 33.6% of overall Plan funds. CIP Fees/Revenues represent the second largest funding source, accounting 

for 30.7% of the Plan’s funding. Sources deriving from Miami-Dade County represent 9.4% of the Plan. The 

remaining 26.3% of funding is from Federal, State, Grant-Other and Private Donations/Other sources. 

The “Funding Type by Job Number” Report in the Reports Section provides a listing of projects associated 

with the various sources under each of the funding types described above. 

15
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

Funded, Partially Funded and Unfunded Projects

The projects in the CIP can be placed in one of three funding proportion categories: Funded, Partially Funded 

or Unfunded. The “Cost Estimates versus Available Funding” listing in the Reports Section provides a 

breakdown of funded, partially funded and unfunded projects by fund. It is important to note that the total 

funded amounts in the CIP do not account for unfunded project estimates. The funding proportion is 

determined by comparing a project’s estimated costs against anticipated revenues and available dollars. It is 

anticipated that revenues to address the unfunded gap will derive from future year allocations of general fund 

revenues or other existing recurring revenues, successful pursuit of grants, or identification of new revenue 

sources or financing options. 

The portion of project estimates that is currently unfunded accounts for 42.6% of total estimated costs for the 

projects identified in the “Cost Estimates versus Available Funding” listing. This percentage is derived from 

projects that are completely unfunded 10.9% as well as the unfunded portion of partially funded 31.7% 

projects. These needs will be evaluated annually based on priorities and availability of funding. 

16
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

Discussion on Miami Trolley

The City of Miami received a grant in the amount of $4.1 Million from the American Recovery and 

Reimbursement Act (ARRA) for the purchase of Rubber Tire Trolley Vehicles and Capital Equipment as 

well as installation of bus benches / shelters as part of the Economic Stimulus Package enacted by the United 

States Congress in 2009. In addition, the City of Miami received a grant in the amount of $1.9 Million from 

the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) which requires a 33.3% match of city funds for the 

purchase of Classic American Trolleys, 32' in length. The City also received a grant in the amount of $1.5M 

from FDOT which requires a 50% match for Operation and Maintenance cost associated with the Health 

District/Stadium and the Brickell/Biscayne routes. 

Complimenting the grants with Transit Half-Cent Surtax, the City of Miami launched its inaugural routes of 

the Miami Trolley (Health District, Health District/Stadium, Brickell/Biscayne). The latest survey indicates 

an average of 2,000 passengers daily, and more on event days. All Trolleys are accessible to riders using 

wheelchairs and are ADA Compliant. The Trolley provides the same high level of service to passengers with 

or without disabilities. The following are some accessibility features provided as part of our service: 

 Trolley Stops Announcements 

 Boarding Assistance 

 Assistance for Passengers with Visual and Mobility Impairments 

For the Safety and Security of All Trolley Passengers, the following Policies are in place: 

 Eating, drinking, and smoking are not allowed on the trolley. 

 Caustic or flammable materials are not allowed on board. 

 Service animals trained to assist persons with disabilities are welcome. Other pets must be kept in a 

secured carrier. 

The Health District, Health District/Stadium routes 

began on March 1, 2012. The service runs 

approximately every 15 minutes from 6:30 am to 11 

pm, Monday through Saturday. The Health District 

Trolley route will travel around the district between 

NW 7th Avenue and NW 14th Avenue and NW 14th 

Street and NW 20th Street. Routes include stops at the 

following locations: UM Life Science Park, Lindsey 

Hopkins Technical Education Center, Miami-Dade 

College Medical Campus, Ryder Trauma Center, 

Jackson Memorial Hospital, Veterans Affairs Miami 

Medical Center, UM Hospital and Clinics, UM 

Biomedical Research Building, Bascom Palmer Eye 

Institute, Marlins Stadium. 

17
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

The Brickell/Biscayne route, serving the downtown 

area, was launched on April 27, 2012. The service 

runs approximately every 15 minutes from 6:30 am 

to 11 pm, Monday through Saturday and on Sundays 

during Miami HEAT playoff games. Routes include 

stops at the following locations: Financial District, 

Mary Brickell Village, Brickell Key, Miami 

Convention Center, Bayfront Park, Freedom Tower, 

Miami-Dade College Wolfson Campus, American 

Airlines Arena, Museum Park, Adrienne Arsht 

Center, Miami International University Art and 

Design, Margaret Pace Park, Omni Bus Terminal. 

The Overtown/Health District route is scheduled 

to launch in July 2012. The service will run 

approximately every 15 minutes from 6:30 am to 

7:00 pm, Monday through Friday. Routes include 

stops at the following locations: UM Life Science 

Park, Lindsey Hopkins Technical Education 

Center, Miami-Dade College Medical Campus, 

Ryder Trauma Center, Bascom Palmer Eye 

Institute, Biomedical Research Institute UM, UM 

Hospials and Clinics, Seybold Pointe, Henry 

Reeves Park, Rosa Parks Community SchoolOvertown, Overtown Transit Village, Black Police 

Precinct & Courthouse Museum, Booker T. 

Washington School. 

18
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

19
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

HEALTH DISTRICT TROLLEY

20
Section Reports

1 – Funding Type by Job No.
 Fund Source Management System

City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Funding Type by Job No.

FUNDING Funding

Total

Approp.

Prior Approp.

2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2

Future Fundin

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

Grant - Federal

000007 American Recovery Reinvestment Act (ARRA) CD

 $0  $0 $0 $2,497,123 $2,497,123 B-40181 James L. Knight Center Chiller & Cooling

 $0  $0 $0 $2,497,123 $2,497,123 000007 

888902 Community Development Block Grant

 $0  $0 $0 $400,000 $400,000 B-30035A North Shorecrest Roads Improvements Project

 $0  $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 B-30365E Coral Way NET Office Remodeling - CD

 $0  $0 $0 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 888902 

888925 FEMA Recovery Assistance

 $0  $0 $0 $173,200 $173,200 B-50654 Overtown Stormwater Pump Station Upgrades

 $0  $0 $0 $173,200 $173,200 888925 

888927 Federal Aviation Admin. Grant

 $0  $0 $0 $150,000 $150,000 B-75001 Watson Island Infrastructure

 $0  $0 $0 $150,000 $150,000 888927 

888939 FEMA Federal Assistance to Firefighters Grant

 $0  $0 $0 $656,466 $656,466 B-70411 Fire Rescue Personal Protective Equipment

 $0  $0 $0 $656,466 $656,466 888939 

888959 FEMA 2007 & Future Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Grant

 $0  $0 $600,000 $0 $600,000 B-30588 San Marco Island and Biscayne Island Drainage

 $0  $0 $600,000 $0 $600,000 888959 

 $0 

 $0 $600,000 $4,876,789 $5,476,789 Grant - Federal

Grant - State

888907 Florida Recreation Assistance Program

 $0  $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 B-30585 Morningside Park New Pool Facility

 $0  $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 888907 

888909 FL Dept of Environmental Protection (FDEP)

 $0  $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 B-30588 San Marco Island and Biscayne Island Drainage

 $0  $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 888909 

888913 FDOT Transportation Enhancement Program

 $0  $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 B-30130 Miami River Greenway SW 1st Court to South

 $0  $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 B-30336 Miami River Greenway (5th Street bridge

 $0  $0 $1,079,879 $0 $1,079,879 B-30624 Overtown Greenway @ NW 11 Terrace -

 $0  $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 B-30631 Miami River Greenway from Miami Circle

 $0  $0 $2,339,739 $0 $2,339,739 B-30651 Miami River Greenway from NW 10th to NW

21
 Fund Source Management System

City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Funding Type by Job No.

FUNDING Funding

Total

Approp.

Prior Approp.

2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2

Future Fundin

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

Grant - State (Cont.)

888913 FDOT Transportation Enhancement Program

 $0  $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 B-39911 Venetian Causeway Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 B-40643A North Spring Garden Greenway

 $0  $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 B-40686 Miami River Greenways/ Streetscape Segment

 $0  $0 $5,419,618 $4,000,000 $9,419,618 888913 

888917 FDOT Other

 $0  $0 $0 $83,537 $83,537 B-30542A US1 Roadway Improvements and Wall

 $0  $0 $0 $1,899,151 $1,899,151 B-70715 City of Miami Trolley Program - Capital

 $0  $0 $0 $4,460,746 $4,460,746 B-75005 Watson Island Aviation & Visitor Center

 $0  $0 $0 $6,443,434 $6,443,434 888917 

888920 FIND Waterways Assistance Program FY07 and Future

 $0  $0 $0 $35,000 $35,000 B-30541B Kennedy Park Floating Dock PHI

 $0  $0 $0 $40,000 $40,000 B-30541C Kennedy Park Shoreline Stabilization Phase I

 $0  $0 $0 $40,000 $40,000 B-30604 Miamarina Intracoastal Bulkhead Assessment

 $0  $0 $0 $175,000 $175,000 B-30688 Marine Stadium Restoration

 $0  $0 $0 $17,500 $17,500 B-30689 Marine Stadium Bulkhead Replacement

 $0  $0 $0 $38,750 $38,750 B-30706 Miscellaneous Repairs 10% Set Aside

 $0  $0 $0 $15,000 $15,000 B-30721 Spoil Island E Restoration and Floating Dock

 $0  $0 $0 $46,500 $46,500 B-30731 Miami Women's Club Baywalk Project - CRA

 $0  $0 $0 $7,500 $7,500 B-40171 Coconut Grove Viewing Platform Spoil Island

 $0  $0 $0 $7,500 $7,500 B-40172 Coconut Grove Viewing Platform Spoil Island

 $0  $0 $800,000 $0 $800,000 B-40180 Marine Stadium Marina at Virginia Key

 $0  $0 $800,000 $422,750 $1,222,750 888920 

888960 Sunshine State Financing Commission Number 1

 $0  $0 $0 $75,534 $75,534 B-30538 Museum Park - Partially Funded by CRA

 $0  $0 $0 $2,449,706 $2,449,706 B-30541 Citywide Park Equipment & Site Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $8,063 $8,063 B-30546A Gusman Hall Improvements - FY2012

 $0  $0 $0 $145,829 $145,829 B-35887 Moore Park New Construction

 $0  $0 $0 $2,679,132 $2,679,132 888960 

888961 Sunshine State Financing Commission Number 2

 $0  $0 $0 $8,000,467 $8,000,467 B-30305B Gibson Park New Construction (Partially

 $0  $0 $0 $66,897 $66,897 B-30325 Miamarina Emergency Pier Repairs

 $0  $0 $0 $6,015,466 $6,015,466 B-30538 Museum Park - Partially Funded by CRA

 $0  $0 $0 $1,012,439 $1,012,439 B-30541 Citywide Park Equipment & Site Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $96,937 $96,937 B-30546A Gusman Hall Improvements - FY2012

 $0  $0 $0 $230,000 $230,000 B-30566A Melreese Golf Training Center

 $0  $0 $0 $475,000 $475,000 B-30588 San Marco Island and Biscayne Island Drainage

22
 Fund Source Management System

City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Funding Type by Job No.

FUNDING Funding

Total

Approp.

Prior Approp.

2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2

Future Fundin

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

Grant - State (Cont.)

888961 Sunshine State Financing Commission Number 2

 $0  $0 $0 $750,000 $750,000 B-35002 Virginia Key Landfill Assessment

 $0  $0 $0 $505,070 $505,070 B-35806 Curtis Park New Pool Facility

 $0  $0 $0 $560,000 $560,000 B-35812A Duarte Park Building Renovation, Splash Park

 $0  $0 $0 $21,000 $21,000 B-35838 Kennedy Park Restroom Building

 $0  $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000 B-35853A Virrick Park New Pool Facility

 $0  $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 B-35865A Coral Gate Park Community Building

 $0  $0 $0 $3,785,528 $3,785,528 B-35883A Hadley Park New Youth Center

 $0  $0 $0 $1,454,174 $1,454,174 B-35887 Moore Park New Construction

 $0  $0 $0 $3,845,377 $3,845,377 B-60454 Fire Station #14 (New)

 $0  $0 $0 $29,236 $29,236 B-70100 Gusman Hall Improvements / Repairs

 $0  $0 $0 $484,979 $484,979 B-70414 James L. Knight Center / Hyatt- Fire Alarm

 $0  $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000 B-70416 Emergency Radio Equipment replacement

 $0  $0 $0 $400,000 $400,000 B-72915A Police Headquarters Helipad and Roof

 $0  $0 $0 $28,132,570 $28,132,570 888961 

888966 Sunshine State Financing Commission Number 3

 $0  $0 $0 $8,356,706 $8,356,706 B-74609 ERP Integration System

 $0  $0 $0 $6,467,852 $6,467,852 B-74610 Technology Infrastructure

 $0  $0 $0 $5,139,942 $5,139,942 B-74614 Land Management System

 $0  $0 $0 $19,964,500 $19,964,500 888966 

888967 Economic Stimulus Package 2009 - FDOT

 $0  $0 $0 $3,955,018 $3,955,018 B-78508B ARRA - NE 2nd Avenue Improvements (57th

 $0  $0 $0 $2,220,578 $2,220,578 B-78508C ARRA - NE 2 Avenue Improvements Segment

 $0  $0 $0 $6,175,596 $6,175,596 888967 

888974 Economic Stimulus 2009 - FD Of Health

 $0  $0 $0 $392,130 $392,130 B-30694 ARRA Citywide Bicycle Rack & Signage

 $0  $0 $0 $392,130 $392,130 888974 

 $0 

 $0 $6,219,618 $68,910,112 $75,129,730 Grant - State

Grant - Miami-Dade County

373001 Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond

 $0  $0 $0 $119,622 $119,622 B-30541 Citywide Park Equipment & Site Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $119,622 $119,622 373001 

373002 Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond 2008 & Future

 $0  $0 $0 $83,320 $83,320 B-30541 Citywide Park Equipment & Site Improvements

23
 Fund Source Management System

City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Funding Type by Job No.

FUNDING Funding

Total

Approp.

Prior Approp.

2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2

Future Fundin

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

 $0  $0 $0 $83,320 $83,320 373002 

888896 Miami-Dade County DERM Virginia Key Grant

 $0  $0 $0 $650,000 $650,000 B-35002 Virginia Key Landfill Assessment

 $0  $0 $0 $650,000 $650,000 888896 

888938 Miami-Dade County Grant/Contribution

 $0  $0 $0 $450,000 $450,000 B-30646 South Bayshore Drive Roadway and Drainage

 $0  $0 $0 $99,418 $99,418 B-40268 FEC Quiet Zone Study

 $0  $0 $0 $549,418 $549,418 888938 

888947 MDC Building Better Communities GOB

 $0  $5,569,000 $0 $681,000 $6,250,000 B-30011 Englewood Road and Storm Sewer

 $0  $4,260,000 $0 $671,000 $4,931,000 B-30014 Northwest Road and Storm Sewers

 $0  $961,000 $0 $0 $961,000 B-30504 Linear Parks, Greenways and Baywalk

 $0  $0 $0 $15,500,000 $15,500,000 B-30508 Virginia Key Beach Park Museum

 $0  $0 $0 $250,000 $250,000 B-30531 Dorsey Memorial Library Restoration

 $0 $10,790,000 $0 $17,102,000 $27,892,000 888947 

888953 Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Org (MPO)

 $0  $0 $0 $48,000 $48,000 B-30645C Health District Bicycle and Pedestrian

 $0  $0 $48,000 $0 $48,000 B-30645D Baywalk Mobility Plan

 $0  $0 $48,000 $48,000 $96,000 888953 

888964 County CDT

 $0  $0 $0 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 B-30508 Virginia Key Beach Park Museum

 $0  $0 $0 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 888964 

888968 Economic Stimulus Package 2009 - Miami Dade County (MDC)

 $0  $0 $0 $4,084,282 $4,084,282 B-30668 ARRA - Purchase of Trolley Vehicles

 $0  $0 $0 $4,084,282 $4,084,282 888968 

888976 Miami-Dade County Dept Cultural Affairs

 $0  $0 $354,614 $0 $354,614 B-30671 Caribbean Marketplace Renovation

 $0  $0 $354,614 $0 $354,614 888976 

 $0 

$10,790,000 $402,614 $27,636,642 $38,829,256 Grant - Miami-Dade County

Grant - Other

000004 CRA Operating Budget

 $0  $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 B-30305B Gibson Park New Construction (Partially

 $0  $0 $0 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 B-30394 North 14 St. Multi Media Entertainment

 $0  $0 $5,000,000 $0 $5,000,000 B-30538 Museum Park - Partially Funded by CRA

 $0  $0 $0 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 B-30579 Old Fire Station No. 2 Restoration - CRA

24
 Fund Source Management System

City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Funding Type by Job No.

FUNDING Funding

Total

Approp.

Prior Approp.

2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2

Future Fundin

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

Grant - Other (Cont.)

000004 CRA Operating Budget

 $0  $0 $0 $1,120,080 $1,120,080 B-30624 Overtown Greenway @ NW 11 Terrace -

 $0  $0 $0 $46,500 $46,500 B-30731 Miami Women's Club Baywalk Project - CRA

 $0  $0 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 B-40169 300 NW 11 Street Community Center - CRA

 $0  $0 $5,000,000 $13,166,580 $18,166,580 000004 

888932 Greater Miami CVB

 $0  $0 $0 $284,569 $284,569 B-75005 Watson Island Aviation & Visitor Center

 $0  $0 $0 $284,569 $284,569 888932 

888955 MSEA Contribution to Capital

 $0  $0 $0 $2,155,560 $2,155,560 B-30566A Melreese Golf Training Center

 $0  $0 $0 $350,000 $350,000 B-30671 Caribbean Marketplace Renovation

 $0  $0 $0 $2,505,560 $2,505,560 888955 

888957 Downtown Development Agency

 $0  $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000 B-30645A Transportation Program Support Services -

 $0  $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000 888957 

888962 The Children's Trust

 $0  $0 $0 $260,000 $260,000 B-30174 Virginia Key Beach Park Historic Restoration

 $0  $0 $0 $260,000 $260,000 888962 

888965 Bayfront Park Management Trust

 $0  $0 $0 $309,000 $309,000 B-40173 Bayfront Park Electrical Repairs

 $0  $0 $0 $309,000 $309,000 888965 

888975 Hyatt - Chiller/Cooling Tower

 $0  $0 $2,024,277 $0 $2,024,277 B-40181 James L. Knight Center Chiller & Cooling

 $0  $0 $2,024,277 $0 $2,024,277 888975 

 $0 

 $0 $7,024,277 $16,550,709 $23,574,986 Grant - Other

City Bonds

356005-1 Streets Bond Program - Series 1

 $0  $0 $0 $1,643,748 $1,643,748 B-30011 Englewood Road and Storm Sewer

 $0  $0 $0 $150,000 $150,000 B-30035A North Shorecrest Roads Improvements Project

 $0  $0 $0 $616,615 $616,615 B-30035B Shorecrest Roadway Milling & Resurfacing

 $0  $0 $0 $407,530 $407,530 B-30130 Miami River Greenway SW 1st Court to South

 $0  $0 $0 $182,100 $182,100 B-30167B Shenandoah Traffic Calming - Phase 2 - D4

 $0  $0 $0 $353,127 $353,127 B-30167D Shenandoah Roadway Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $96,100 $96,100 B-30168A Silver Bluff Traffic Calming Priority 3 - D4

25
 Fund Source Management System

City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Funding Type by Job No.

FUNDING Funding

Total

Approp.

Prior Approp.

2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2

Future Fundin

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

City Bonds (Cont.)

356005-1 Streets Bond Program - Series 1

 $0  $0 $0 $250,692 $250,692 B-30377A District 1 - Sidewalk Repairs and ADA

 $0  $0 $0 $250,691 $250,691 B-30377B District 2 - Sidewalk Repairs & ADA

 $0  $0 $0 $250,691 $250,691 B-30377C District 3 - Sidewalk Repairs and ADA

 $0  $0 $0 $250,691 $250,691 B-30377D District 4 - Sidewalk Repairs & ADA

 $0  $0 $0 $250,691 $250,691 B-30377E District 5 - Sidewalk Repairs & ADA

 $0  $0 $0 $1,291,774 $1,291,774 B-30542A US1 Roadway Improvements and Wall

 $0  $0 $0 $236,151 $236,151 B-30606 DWNTWN Beautification Project Phase I

 $0  $0 $0 $341,271 $341,271 B-30606D DWNTWN Beautification - Design Phase

 $0  $0 $0 $1,371,543 $1,371,543 B-30606L DWNTWN Beautification (Lighting)

 $0  $0 $0 $4,651,682 $4,651,682 B-30606N DWNTWN Beautification - North

 $0  $0 $0 $3,399,353 $3,399,353 B-30606S DWNTWN Beautification - South

 $0  $0 $0 $17,929 $17,929 B-30613 District 3 - Miscellaneous Roadway

 $0  $0 $0 $36,001 $36,001 B-30614 District 4 - Miscellaneous Roadway

 $0  $0 $0 $170,283 $170,283 B-30615 District 5 - Miscellaneous Roadway

 $0  $0 $0 $542,287 $542,287 B-30629 Durham Terrace Drainage Project

 $0  $0 $0 $1,368,535 $1,368,535 B-30643 Lummus Park Landing Project - Street Project

 $0  $0 $0 $230,000 $230,000 B-30662D US-1 Median Closures at Bridgeport and SW

 $0  $0 $0 $203,036 $203,036 B-30687 Coconut Grove Business Improvement District -

 $0  $0 $0 $721,100 $721,100 B-30699 Beacom Project Area Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $85,000 $85,000 B-30703 Bob Hope Dr. Between NW 20th Street to NW

 $0  $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 B-30704 NW 14th Avenue Between NW 24th Street to

 $0  $0 $0 $223,165 $223,165 B-30705 NW 24th Street Between NW 14th Avenue and

 $0  $0 $0 $350,000 $350,000 B-30718 I-95 South Miami Terminal Street

 $0  $0 $0 $135,000 $135,000 B-30719 SW 16th Avenue from Coral Way to 20 Street -

 $0  $0 $0 $311,000 $311,000 B-30722 NW 31st Street Roadway Improvement Project

 $0  $0 $0 $607,762 $607,762 B-30725 NW 11th Street Roadway Improvement Project

 $0  $0 $0 $259,540 $259,540 B-30732 NW 9th Street Roadway Improvement Project -

 $0  $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 B-30770 SW 22nd Avenue Medians - US 1 to Coral Way

 $0  $0 $0 $324,670 $324,670 B-30771 Traffic Calming SW 6th Street Project - D4

 $0  $0 $0 $600,000 $600,000 B-30776 Silver Bluff Drainage Improvements - D4

 $0  $0 $0 $126,437 $126,437 B-30780 NW 14 Avenue and 28 Street Area Roadway

 $0  $0 $0 $739,493 $739,493 B-30781 NW 11 Street from 27 to 37 Avenue Area

 $0  $0 $0 $85,997 $85,997 B-40183 Belle Meade Gateway Enclosure

 $0  $0 $0 $1,257,175 $1,257,175 B-40643A North Spring Garden Greenway

 $0  $0 $0 $459,881 $459,881 B-40672D Flagami Traffic Calming Phase IV - D4

 $0  $0 $0 $455,506 $455,506 B-40686 Miami River Greenways/ Streetscape Segment

 $0  $0 $0 $657,244 $657,244 B-40704A SW 32 Avenue Improvements Additional

26
 Fund Source Management System

City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Funding Type by Job No.

FUNDING Funding

Total

Approp.

Prior Approp.

2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2

Future Fundin

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

City Bonds (Cont.)

356005-1 Streets Bond Program - Series 1

 $0  $0 $0 $846,200 $846,200 B-43114A Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Phase 29

 $0  $0 $0 $27,042,691 $27,042,691 356005-1 

356005-2 Streets Bond Program - Series 2

 $0  $0 $0 $3,407,401 $3,407,401 B-30014 Northwest Road and Storm Sewers

 $0  $0 $0 $597,178 $597,178 B-30035A North Shorecrest Roads Improvements Project

 $0  $0 $0 $49,777 $49,777 B-30035B Shorecrest Roadway Milling & Resurfacing

 $0  $0 $0 $150,000 $150,000 B-30130 Miami River Greenway SW 1st Court to South

 $0  $0 $0 $1,196,873 $1,196,873 B-30167D Shenandoah Roadway Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $514,741 $514,741 B-30168A Silver Bluff Traffic Calming Priority 3 - D4

 $0  $0 $0 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 B-30500 Civic Center NW 14th Street

 $0  $0 $0 $1,296,112 $1,296,112 B-30542A US1 Roadway Improvements and Wall

 $0  $0 $0 $600,000 $600,000 B-30588 San Marco Island and Biscayne Island Drainage

 $0  $0 $0 $2,864,414 $2,864,414 B-30606 DWNTWN Beautification Project Phase I

 $0  $0 $0 $157,509 $157,509 B-30606D DWNTWN Beautification - Design Phase

 $0  $0 $0 $3,104,372 $3,104,372 B-30606L DWNTWN Beautification (Lighting)

 $0  $0 $0 $1,754,250 $1,754,250 B-30606N DWNTWN Beautification - North

 $0  $0 $0 $680,000 $680,000 B-30606S DWNTWN Beautification - South

 $0  $0 $0 $111,419 $111,419 B-30611 District 1 - Miscellaneous Roadway

 $0  $0 $0 $8,802,400 $8,802,400 B-30613 District 3 - Miscellaneous Roadway

 $0  $0 $0 $380 $380 B-30614 District 4 - Miscellaneous Roadway

 $0  $0 $0 $1,294,228 $1,294,228 B-30615 District 5 - Miscellaneous Roadway

 $0  $0 $0 $2,683,043 $2,683,043 B-30629 Durham Terrace Drainage Project

 $0  $0 $0 $2,379,918 $2,379,918 B-30630 Palm Grove Road Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 B-30637 Mary Brickell Village Drainage Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $2,896,602 $2,896,602 B-30687 Coconut Grove Business Improvement District -

 $0  $0 $0 $35,892 $35,892 B-30693 Neighborhood Traffic Calming

 $0  $0 $0 $105,000 $105,000 B-30703 Bob Hope Dr. Between NW 20th Street to NW

 $0  $0 $0 $165,000 $165,000 B-30704 NW 14th Avenue Between NW 24th Street to

 $0  $0 $0 $136,835 $136,835 B-30705 NW 24th Street Between NW 14th Avenue and

 $0  $0 $0 $400,400 $400,400 B-30716 Tigertail Resurfacing - D2

 $0  $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 B-30717 Coral Gate Community Improvements - D4

 $0  $0 $0 $509,000 $509,000 B-30718 I-95 South Miami Terminal Street

 $0  $0 $0 $3,700,001 $3,700,001 B-30724 NW 33rd Street Roadway Improvement Project

 $0  $0 $0 $142,238 $142,238 B-30725 NW 11th Street Roadway Improvement Project

 $0  $0 $0 $888,000 $888,000 B-30726 NW 60th Avenue Roadway Improvement

 $0  $0 $0 $1,810,000 $1,810,000 B-30727 NW 18th Avenue Roadway Improvement

 $0  $0 $0 $110,000 $110,000 B-30728 NW 17th Court Roadway Improvement Project

27
 Fund Source Management System

City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Funding Type by Job No.

FUNDING Funding

Total

Approp.

Prior Approp.

2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2

Future Fundin

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

City Bonds (Cont.)

356005-2 Streets Bond Program - Series 2

 $0  $0 $0 $250,000 $250,000 B-30729 NW 17th Terrace Roadway Improvement

 $0  $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 B-30730 NW 4th Terrace Roadway Improvement Project

 $0  $0 $0 $496,708 $496,708 B-30732 NW 9th Street Roadway Improvement Project -

 $0  $0 $0 $198,000 $198,000 B-30741 SW 16 Avenue Roadway & Drainage

 $0  $0 $0 $250,000 $250,000 B-30743 SW 28th Road Roadway & Drainage

 $0  $0 $0 $402,000 $402,000 B-30745 NW 8th Street Roadway and Drainage

 $0  $0 $0 $180,000 $180,000 B-30746 NW 14th Court Roadway & Drainage

 $0  $0 $0 $400,000 $400,000 B-30747 SW 13th Street Roadway & Drainage

 $0  $0 $0 $600,000 $600,000 B-30760 SW 17th Avenue Roadway & Drainage

 $0  $0 $0 $48,108 $48,108 B-30775 Shenandoah Area Improvements - D4

 $0  $0 $0 $300,001 $300,001 B-30880 NE 2nd Court Roadway and Drainage

 $0  $0 $0 $2,196,465 $2,196,465 B-39911 Venetian Causeway Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $60,000 $60,000 B-40174 Royal Road - Milling and Resurfacing - D2

 $0  $0 $0 $850,000 $850,000 B-40666B Brickell Lighting Phase II - D2

 $0  $0 $0 $738,131 $738,131 B-40672D Flagami Traffic Calming Phase IV - D4

 $0  $0 $0 $590,000 $590,000 B-40672G Flagami Traffic Calming - D4 (Including 11th

 $0  $0 $0 $1,179,778 $1,179,778 B-40686 Miami River Greenways/ Streetscape Segment

 $0  $0 $0 $310,083 $310,083 B-40704A SW 32 Avenue Improvements Additional

 $0  $0 $0 $56,367,257 $56,367,257 356005-2 

363001 1984 Police Bonds

 $0  $0 $0 $1,771 $1,771 B-72915 Police Headquarters Helipad and Roof

 $0  $0 $0 $1,771 $1,771 363001 

369100 1991 Fire Bonds

 $0  $0 $0 $50,400 $50,400 B-72802 Fire Stations & Other Fire Facilities

 $0  $0 $0 $50,400 $50,400 369100 

371100 Series 1995 Sanitary Sewer Bonds

 $0  $0 $60,000 $0 $60,000 B-70600 Police Department Sanitary Sewer System

 $0  $0 $60,000 $0 $60,000 371100 

385200-1 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 1)

 $0  $0 $0 $29,346 $29,346 B-30078 Homeland Defense Legal Services Support

 $0  $0 $0 $491,852 $491,852 B-30325 Miamarina Emergency Pier Repairs

 $0  $0 $0 $27,127 $27,127 B-30508 Virginia Key Beach Park Museum

 $0  $0 $0 $90,000 $90,000 B-30538 Museum Park - Partially Funded by CRA

 $0  $0 $0 $19,940 $19,940 B-30541 Citywide Park Equipment & Site Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $42,111 $42,111 B-30671 Caribbean Marketplace Renovation

 $0  $0 $0 $58,775 $58,775 B-33514 Marine Stadium Marina Improvements

28
 Fund Source Management System

City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Funding Type by Job No.

FUNDING Funding

Total

Approp.

Prior Approp.

2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2

Future Fundin

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

City Bonds (Cont.)

385200-1 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 1)

 $0  $0 $0 $14,072 $14,072 B-35806 Curtis Park New Pool Facility

 $0  $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 B-35838 Kennedy Park Restroom Building

 $0  $0 $0 $685,344 $685,344 B-35853A Virrick Park New Pool Facility

 $0  $0 $0 $400,499 $400,499 B-35865A Coral Gate Park Community Building

 $0  $0 $0 $393,642 $393,642 B-35887 Moore Park New Construction

 $0  $0 $0 $260,307 $260,307 B-35904 Neighborhood Parks Improv. Contingencies -

 $0  $0 $0 $79,800 $79,800 B-40643A North Spring Garden Greenway

 $0  $0 $0 $123,618 $123,618 B-40665 Brentwood Village Project

 $0  $0 $0 $5,085 $5,085 B-40695L Miami River Greenway Segment G and

 $0  $0 $0 $714,000 $714,000 B-50705 Kinloch Storm Sewer Improvements Project

 $0  $0 $0 $52,992 $52,992 B-60453A Fire Station #13

 $0  $0 $0 $181,362 $181,362 B-60454 Fire Station #14 (New)

 $0  $0 $0 $3,798 $3,798 B-72803 Fire Station Equipment and Furniture

 $0  $0 $0 $802,249 $802,249 B-72813 Defense and Security Equipment Acquisition

 $0  $0 $0 $1,050,600 $1,050,600 B-78508 NE 2 Avenue Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $5,626,519 $5,626,519 385200-1 

385200-2 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 2)

 $0  $0 $0 $6,992 $6,992 B-30134A Bryan Park New Tennis/Community Center

 $0  $0 $0 $1,046,765 $1,046,765 B-30174 Virginia Key Beach Park Historic Restoration

 $0  $0 $0 $97,774 $97,774 B-30305B Gibson Park New Construction (Partially

 $0  $0 $0 $605,678 $605,678 B-30325 Miamarina Emergency Pier Repairs

 $0  $0 $0 $288,153 $288,153 B-30538 Museum Park - Partially Funded by CRA

 $0  $0 $0 $408,167 $408,167 B-30541 Citywide Park Equipment & Site Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $207,889 $207,889 B-30671 Caribbean Marketplace Renovation

 $0  $0 $0 $839,408 $839,408 B-30689 Marine Stadium Bulkhead Replacement

 $0  $0 $0 $53,000 $53,000 B-30772 Bay of Pigs Park Lighting - D4

 $0  $0 $0 $116,782 $116,782 B-30800 Fern Isle / PBA Park Improvements Project -

 $0  $0 $0 $108,439 $108,439 B-35806 Curtis Park New Pool Facility

 $0  $0 $0 $1,129,251 $1,129,251 B-35865A Coral Gate Park Community Building

 $0  $0 $0 $578,237 $578,237 B-39910E District 2 Quality of Life Park Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $5,006,636 $5,006,636 B-60453A Fire Station #13

 $0  $0 $0 $194,711 $194,711 B-60464 New Dinner Key Marina Dockmaster Building

 $0  $0 $0 $983,364 $983,364 B-72813 Defense and Security Equipment Acquisition

 $0  $0 $0 $738,000 $738,000 B-78502A Museum of Science - Development in

 $0  $0 $0 $12,409,246 $12,409,246 385200-2 

385200-3 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 3)

29
 Fund Source Management System

City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Funding Type by Job No.

FUNDING Funding

Total

Approp.

Prior Approp.

2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2

Future Fundin

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

City Bonds (Cont.)

385200-3 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 3)

 $0  $0 $0 $845,136 $845,136 B-30134A Bryan Park New Tennis/Community Center

 $0  $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 B-30178 Design District/FEC

 $0  $0 $0 $450,000 $450,000 B-30179 Downtown Baywalk Master Plan & Design

 $0  $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 B-30538B Museum Park Environmental Remediation -

 $0  $0 $0 $457,515 $457,515 B-30541 Citywide Park Equipment & Site Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $35,001 $35,001 B-30541B Kennedy Park Floating Dock PHI

 $0  $0 $0 $71,001 $71,001 B-30541C Kennedy Park Shoreline Stabilization Phase I

 $0  $0 $0 $215,348 $215,348 B-30547E Parks ADA Modifications - District 2

 $0  $0 $0 $96,917 $96,917 B-30547F Parks ADA Modifications - District 3 - Jose

 $0  $0 $0 $491,147 $491,147 B-30547G Parks ADA Modifications - District 4 -

 $0  $0 $0 $211,137 $211,137 B-30547H Parks ADA Modifications - District 5

 $0  $0 $0 $42,048 $42,048 B-30685A 1814 Brickell Avenue Park

 $0  $0 $0 $175,000 $175,000 B-30688 Marine Stadium Restoration

 $0  $0 $0 $178,000 $178,000 B-30689 Marine Stadium Bulkhead Replacement

 $0  $0 $0 $435,471 $435,471 B-30690 West End Park New Community Building

 $0  $0 $0 $250,000 $250,000 B-30696 Miamarina Pier A, B & C Fire Line Repairs

 $0  $0 $0 $0 $0 B-30721 Spoil Island E Restoration and Floating Dock

 $0  $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 B-30773 Martin Luther King (MLK) Blvd / I-95 Area

 $0  $0 $0 $50,027 $50,027 B-30801 Manatee Bend Park Shoreline Improvements -

 $0  $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 B-30802 Pallot Park Shoreline Improvements - D2

 $0  $0 $0 $14,124 $14,124 B-30820 Legion Park Boat Ramp Repairs - D2

 $0  $0 $0 $122,000 $122,000 B-30821 Coral Gate Park Furniture, Security System and

 $0  $0 $0 $600,000 $600,000 B-30882 African Square Park - Splash Park - D5

 $0  $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 B-30884 NW 62 Street West of I-95 Roadway

 $0  $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 B-30885 Freedom Garden Statue Rehabilitation - D5

 $0  $0 $0 $925,061 $925,061 B-30886 Lummus Landing Square - D5

 $0  $0 $0 $250,000 $250,000 B-33514 Marine Stadium Marina Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $1,297,161 $1,297,161 B-35806 Curtis Park New Pool Facility

 $0  $0 $0 $752,797 $752,797 B-35812A Duarte Park Building Renovation, Splash Park

 $0  $0 $0 $96,133 $96,133 B-35838 Kennedy Park Restroom Building

 $0  $0 $0 $797,175 $797,175 B-35853A Virrick Park New Pool Facility

 $0  $0 $0 $338,884 $338,884 B-35865A Coral Gate Park Community Building

 $0  $0 $0 $45,000 $45,000 B-35868A Robert King High Park Furniture - D4

 $0  $0 $0 $1,591,277 $1,591,277 B-35883A Hadley Park New Youth Center

 $0  $0 $0 $5,168,221 $5,168,221 B-35887 Moore Park New Construction

 $0  $0 $0 $510,916 $510,916 B-35904 Neighborhood Parks Improv. Contingencies -

 $0  $0 $0 $259,331 $259,331 B-39910 Quality of Life District 2 - Various Projects

30
 Fund Source Management System

City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Funding Type by Job No.

FUNDING Funding

Total

Approp.

Prior Approp.

2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2

Future Fundin

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

City Bonds (Cont.)

385200-3 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 3)

 $0  $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 B-39910C North Venetian Drive Lighting (District 2

 $0  $0 $0 $409,751 $409,751 B-39910E District 2 Quality of Life Park Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $33,132 $33,132 B-39910I Brickell Avenue Decorative Pedestrian

 $0  $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000 B-39910K Bayside Historic Sign - D2

 $0  $0 $0 $55,945 $55,945 B-40170 Irrigation System at Kennedy Dog Park - D2

 $0  $0 $0 $940,007 $940,007 B-40180 Marine Stadium Marina at Virginia Key

 $0  $0 $0 $100,200 $100,200 B-40643A North Spring Garden Greenway

 $0  $0 $0 $478,217 $478,217 B-40686 Miami River Greenways/ Streetscape Segment

 $0  $0 $0 $1,805,867 $1,805,867 B-50705 Kinloch Storm Sewer Improvements Project

 $0  $0 $0 $766,000 $766,000 B-50706A Roadway, Drainage and Traffic Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $18,364 $18,364 B-60453A Fire Station #13

 $0  $0 $0 $1,050,105 $1,050,105 B-60454 Fire Station #14 (New)

 $0  $0 $0 $3,096,440 $3,096,440 B-60464 New Dinner Key Marina Dockmaster Building

 $0  $0 $0 $394,169 $394,169 B-70100 Gusman Hall Improvements / Repairs

 $0  $0 $0 $1,981,636 $1,981,636 B-72813 Defense and Security Equipment Acquisition

 $0  $0 $0 $150,000 $150,000 B-75823 Biscayne Park Site Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $250,000 $250,000 B-75830A Blanche Park Master Plan Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $800,000 $800,000 B-75883 Peacock Park Site Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $15,000 $15,000 B-75973 Oakland Grove Park Playground Equipment

 $0  $0 $0 $1,262,000 $1,262,000 B-78502A Museum of Science - Development in

 $0  $0 $0 $2,649,420 $2,649,420 B-78508 NE 2 Avenue Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $33,753,081 $33,753,081 385200-3 

385200-8 2002 Homeland Defense Series 1 Interest Post 09-30-06

 $0  $0 $0 $841,280 $841,280 B-30305B Gibson Park New Construction (Partially

 $0  $0 $0 $146,827 $146,827 B-30325 Miamarina Emergency Pier Repairs

 $0  $0 $0 $256,436 $256,436 B-30538 Museum Park - Partially Funded by CRA

 $0  $0 $0 $8,500 $8,500 B-30711 Triangle Park Swings - D3

 $0  $0 $0 $306,378 $306,378 B-35853A Virrick Park New Pool Facility

 $0  $0 $0 $1,559,421 $1,559,421 385200-8 

397001 1970 Pollution Control G.O.B. (303000) (399003)

 $0  $0 $0 $361,200 $361,200 B-60351 Fire Station #10 (New)

 $0  $0 $0 $361,200 $361,200 397001 

399001 1976 & 78 Storm Sewer G O Bond

 $0  $0 $0 $250,000 $250,000 B-30183 Garden Storm Sewer - Phase I

 $0  $0 $0 $617,481 $617,481 B-50643 Wagner Creek / Seybold Canal Dredging

 $0  $0 $0 $867,481 $867,481 399001 

31
 Fund Source Management System

City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Funding Type by Job No.

FUNDING Funding

Total

Approp.

Prior Approp.

2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2

Future Fundin

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

 $0  $0 $60,000 138,039,067 138,099,067 City Bonds

CIP Fees/Revenues

356001 Local Option Gas Tax

 $0  $0 $0 $13,181 $13,181 B-30035B Shorecrest Roadway Milling & Resurfacing

 $0  $0 $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 B-30551 Public Works Maintenance Yard

 $0  $0 $0 $747,173 $747,173 B-30588 San Marco Island and Biscayne Island Drainage

 $0  $0 $0 $193,767 $193,767 B-30615 District 5 - Miscellaneous Roadway

 $0  $0 $0 $13,180 $13,180 B-30630 Palm Grove Road Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 B-30700 FDEP Drainage Wells Compliance

 $0  $0 $0 $2,416,500 $2,416,500 B-30991 Citywide Roadway Improvements

 $0  $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 B-30992 Riverview Pump Station

 $0  $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 B-40168 South Bayshore Drive from Aviation Avenue to

 $0  $0 $0 $325,000 $325,000 B-40643A North Spring Garden Greenway

 $0  $0 $0 $3,671,025 $3,671,025 B-43114A Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Phase 29

 $0  $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 B-50654 Overtown Stormwater Pump Station Upgrades

 $0  $0 $2,500,000 $8,179,826 $10,679,826 356001 

356003 Parking Surcharge

 $0  $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 B-71210 Downtown Street Conversions

 $0  $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 356003 

356007 Parking Surcharge 2007

 $0  $0 $0 $549,710 $549,710 B-30606N DWNTWN Beautification - North

 $0  $0 $0 $549,716 $549,716 B-30606S DWNTWN Beautification - South

 $0  $0 $0 $673,568 $673,568 B-30621 Center Grove Street and Lighting Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $1,280,508 $1,280,508 B-30628 Bird Avenue Road Improvement

 $0  $0 $0 $1,000,001 $1,000,001 B-30637 Mary Brickell Village Drainage Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $280,205 $280,205 B-31206 SE 3rd Street Widening

 $0  $0 $0 $4,333,708 $4,333,708 356007 

360001 Stormwater Utility Trust Fund

 $0  $0 $0 $1,372,476 $1,372,476 B-30262 Citywide Storm Sewer Repair Project

 $0  $0 $0 $2,534,160 $2,534,160 B-50643 Wagner Creek / Seybold Canal Dredging

 $0  $0 $0 $360,152 $360,152 B-50654 Overtown Stormwater Pump Station Upgrades

 $0  $0 $0 $4,266,788 $4,266,788 360001 

360003 Stormwater Utility Trust Fund (FY07 and Future)

 $0  $0 $0 $273,961 $273,961 B-30011 Englewood Road and Storm Sewer

 $0  $0 $0 $273,961 $273,961 B-30014 Northwest Road and Storm Sewers

 $0  $0 $741,885 $1,996,800 $2,738,685 B-30262 Citywide Storm Sewer Repair Project

32
 Fund Source Management System

City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Funding Type by Job No.

FUNDING Funding

Total

Approp.

Prior Approp.

2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2

Future Fundin

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

CIP Fees/Revenues (Cont.)

360003 Stormwater Utility Trust Fund (FY07 and Future)

 $0  $0 $0 $489,938 $489,938 B-30588 San Marco Island and Biscayne Island Drainage

 $0  $0 $0 $9,854 $9,854 B-30597 Citywide Drainage Improvement Project

 $0  $0 $0 $220,000 $220,000 B-30629 Durham Terrace Drainage Project

 $0  $0 $0 $715,384 $715,384 B-30632 Drainage Master Plan Update

 $0  $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 B-30637 Mary Brickell Village Drainage Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $504,934 $504,934 B-30700 FDEP Drainage Wells Compliance

 $0  $0 $0 $430,297 $430,297 B-50643 Wagner Creek / Seybold Canal Dredging

 $0  $0 $0 $370,233 $370,233 B-50705 Kinloch Storm Sewer Improvements Project

 $0  $0 $0 $154,917 $154,917 B-50706A Roadway, Drainage and Traffic Improvements

 $0  $0 $741,885 $5,540,279 $6,282,164 360003 

367001 Impact Fees

 $0  $0 $0 $22,020 $22,020 B-30305D Gibson Park Furniture - D5

 $0  $0 $0 $13,134 $13,134 B-30997 Police Swat Vehicles

 $0  $0 $0 $177,892 $177,892 B-31206 SE 3rd Street Widening

 $0  $0 $0 $9,295 $9,295 B-35806 Curtis Park New Pool Facility

 $0  $0 $0 $4,900 $4,900 B-35838 Kennedy Park Restroom Building

 $0  $0 $0 $12,088 $12,088 B-50654 Overtown Stormwater Pump Station Upgrades

 $0  $0 $0 $195,737 $195,737 B-60351 Fire Station #10 (New)

 $0  $0 $0 $82,022 $82,022 B-72803 Fire Station Equipment and Furniture

 $0  $0 $0 $56,321 $56,321 B-72915 Police Headquarters Helipad and Roof

 $0  $0 $0 $573,409 $573,409 367001 

367011 Impact Fees - Ord 12750

 $0  $0 $0 $345,785 $345,785 B-30541 Citywide Park Equipment & Site Improvements

 $0  $0 $397,101 $0 $397,101 B-30541D Citywide Park Equipments & Site

 $0  $0 $377,000 $0 $377,000 B-30995 Virginia Key Bike Trail Building - D2

 $0  $0 $0 $520 $520 B-30996 MRC Emergency Repairs

 $0  $0 $220,552 $37,766 $258,318 B-30997 Police Swat Vehicles

 $0  $0 $0 $193,123 $193,123 B-35806 Curtis Park New Pool Facility

 $0  $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 B-35883A Hadley Park New Youth Center

 $0  $0 $0 $443,600 $443,600 B-35887 Moore Park New Construction

 $0  $0 $0 $6,504 $6,504 B-60453A Fire Station #13

 $0  $0 $0 $65,000 $65,000 B-72915 Police Headquarters Helipad and Roof

 $0  $0 $0 $48,535 $48,535 B-74205B GSA Fleet Maintenance Garage Expansion

 $0  $0 $0 $124 $124 B-75883 Peacock Park Site Improvements

 $0  $0 $994,653 $1,640,957 $2,635,610 367011 

33
 Fund Source Management System

City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Funding Type by Job No.

FUNDING Funding

Total

Approp.

Prior Approp.

2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2

Future Fundin

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

CIP Fees/Revenues (Cont.)

375001 Fire Assessment Fee

 $0  $0 $0 $74,619 $74,619 B-70102A Fire Station No. 6 Office Building - Structural

 $0  $0 $0 $60,301 $60,301 B-70104 Fire Station No. 10 Restroom Remodeling

 $0  $0 $0 $230,000 $230,000 B-70105 Refurbishing of Existing Apparatus

 $0  $0 $0 $158,124 $158,124 B-70106 Firefighting Equipment and Gear

 $0  $0 $0 $120,866 $120,866 B-72801 Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD)

 $0  $0 $0 $2,661,779 $2,661,779 B-72802 Fire Stations & Other Fire Facilities

 $0  $0 $0 $175,000 $175,000 B-72803 Fire Station Equipment and Furniture

 $0  $0 $0 $291,200 $291,200 B-72804 Phone and Radio Equipment Upgrades

 $0  $0 $0 $93,461 $93,461 B-72805 Computer Equipment and Software Upgrades

 $0  $0 $0 $374,867 $374,867 B-72808 Light Fleet Replacement

 $0  $0 $0 $110,316 $110,316 B-72809 Large Firefighting Equipment

 $0  $0 $0 $11,876 $11,876 B-74204 Emergency Dispatch Furniture

 $0  $0 $0 $305,015 $305,015 B-74609 ERP Integration System

 $0  $0 $0 $4,667,424 $4,667,424 375001 

375002 Fire Assessment Fee (FY07)

 $0  $0 $0 $55,524 $55,524 B-70104 Fire Station No. 10 Restroom Remodeling

 $0  $0 $0 $556,814 $556,814 B-72802 Fire Stations & Other Fire Facilities

 $0  $0 $0 $130,018 $130,018 B-72803 Fire Station Equipment and Furniture

 $0  $0 $0 $60,000 $60,000 B-72804 Phone and Radio Equipment Upgrades

 $0  $0 $0 $292,791 $292,791 B-72808 Light Fleet Replacement

 $0  $0 $0 $216,500 $216,500 B-72809 Large Firefighting Equipment

 $0  $0 $0 $1,311,647 $1,311,647 375002 

382001 Contribution From General Fund

 $0  $0 $0 $152,205 $152,205 B-30194A Manuel Artime ADA Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $30,778 $30,778 B-30538 Museum Park - Partially Funded by CRA

 $0  $0 $0 $65,490 $65,490 B-30994 City of Miami Impact Fee Study - Citywide

 $0  $0 $0 $40,000 $40,000 B-30997 Police Swat Vehicles

 $0  $0 $0 $341,186 $341,186 B-60351 Fire Station #10 (New)

 $0  $0 $0 $451,566 $451,566 B-70500 Development/UDP Consultants - Watson Is,

 $0  $0 $0 $117,229 $117,229 B-72915 Police Headquarters Helipad and Roof

 $0  $0 $0 $1,070,989 $1,070,989 B-74200 Citywide General Fleet Replacement

 $0  $0 $0 $9,141,422 $9,141,422 B-74220 Police Vehicle Replacement

 $0  $0 $0 $2,003,786 $2,003,786 B-74606 Upgrade PC Software & Hardware

 $0  $0 $0 $5,486,772 $5,486,772 B-74609 ERP Integration System

 $0  $0 $0 $2,648,299 $2,648,299 B-74610 Technology Infrastructure

 $0  $0 $0 $1,176,209 $1,176,209 B-74614 Land Management System

34
 Fund Source Management System

City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Funding Type by Job No.

FUNDING Funding

Total

Approp.

Prior Approp.

2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2

Future Fundin

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

CIP Fees/Revenues (Cont.)

382001 Contribution From General Fund

 $0  $0 $0 $50,016 $50,016 B-75005 Watson Island Aviation & Visitor Center

 $0  $0 $0 $22,775,947 $22,775,947 382001 

382007 Contribution From General Fund 2003

 $0  $0 $0 $7,000,000 $7,000,000 B-74609 ERP Integration System

 $0  $0 $0 $7,000,000 $7,000,000 382007 

382008 Contribution From General Fund 2007 and Future

 $0  $0 $0 $15,000 $15,000 B-30365E Coral Way NET Office Remodeling - CD

 $0  $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000 B-30365H Generator for City Hall

 $0  $0 $0 $6,770 $6,770 B-30365J Beckham Hall Fire Damage Repair

 $0  $0 $0 $180,800 $180,800 B-30384C Communication UPS Power

 $0  $0 $0 $1,268,254 $1,268,254 B-30551 Public Works Maintenance Yard

 $0  $0 $0 $843,083 $843,083 B-30554 Police Radios Replacement

 $0  $0 $0 $16,545 $16,545 B-30996 MRC Emergency Repairs

 $0  $0 $0 $11,394 $11,394 B-30997 Police Swat Vehicles

 $0  $0 $0 $399,990 $399,990 B-43114A Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Phase 29

 $0  $0 $0 $63,579 $63,579 B-70104 Fire Station No. 10 Restroom Remodeling

 $0  $0 $0 $164,114 $164,114 B-70411 Fire Rescue Personal Protective Equipment

 $0  $0 $0 $68,722 $68,722 B-70418 FEMA Assistance to Firefighters Program

 $0  $0 $0 $753,967 $753,967 B-72802 Fire Stations & Other Fire Facilities

 $0  $0 $0 $150,000 $150,000 B-72803 Fire Station Equipment and Furniture

 $0  $0 $2,113,744 $1,418,538 $3,532,282 B-73202C Solid Waste Collection Equipment

 $0  $0 $0 $2,189,280 $2,189,280 B-74200 Citywide General Fleet Replacement

 $0  $0 $0 $15,098,315 $15,098,315 B-74220 Police Vehicle Replacement

 $0  $0 $0 $916,896 $916,896 B-74606 Upgrade PC Software & Hardware

 $0  $0 $0 $2,825,965 $2,825,965 B-74609 ERP Integration System

 $0  $0 $0 $2,800,000 $2,800,000 B-74617 IT Modernization

 $0  $0 $2,113,744 $29,216,212 $31,329,956 382008 

383001 CIP Misc. Revenue

 $0  $0 $0 $46,358 $46,358 B-50654 Overtown Stormwater Pump Station Upgrades

 $0  $0 $0 $46,358 $46,358 383001 

888923 Contribution From Special Revenue

 $0  $0 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 B-74609 ERP Integration System

 $0  $0 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 888923 

888924 DRI Transportation Fee

 $0  $0 $0 $1,417,532 $1,417,532 B-31220 Downtown DRI Transportation Component

35
 Fund Source Management System

City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Funding Type by Job No.

FUNDING Funding

Total

Approp.

Prior Approp.

2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2

Future Fundin

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

 $0  $0 $0 $1,417,532 $1,417,532 888924 

888926 Prior Year Fund Balance

 $0  $0 $0 $91,565 $91,565 B-50643 Wagner Creek / Seybold Canal Dredging

 $0  $0 $0 $91,565 $91,565 888926 

888930 Transit Half-Cent Surtax

 $0  $0 $0 $2 $2 B-30035B Shorecrest Roadway Milling & Resurfacing

 $0  $0 $0 $149,920 $149,920 B-30183 Garden Storm Sewer - Phase I

 $0  $0 $0 $277,280 $277,280 B-30336 Miami River Greenway (5th Street bridge

 $0  $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 B-30606 DWNTWN Beautification Project Phase I

 $0  $0 $0 $150,916 $150,916 B-30615 District 5 - Miscellaneous Roadway

 $0  $0 $0 $256,693 $256,693 B-30630 Palm Grove Road Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $81,788 $81,788 B-30645A Transportation Program Support Services -

 $0  $0 $0 $2,702 $2,702 B-30716 Tigertail Resurfacing - D2

 $0  $0 $0 $98,933 $98,933 B-30774 West Flagler Area Improvements - D4

 $0  $0 $0 $366,281 $366,281 B-30775 Shenandoah Area Improvements - D4

 $0  $0 $0 $145,372 $145,372 B-30780 NW 14 Avenue and 28 Street Area Roadway

 $0  $0 $0 $140,700 $140,700 B-40695L Miami River Greenway Segment G and

 $0  $0 $0 $284,903 $284,903 B-50706A Roadway, Drainage and Traffic Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $55,001 $55,001 B-78508 NE 2 Avenue Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $2,060,491 $2,060,491 888930 

888931 Transit Half-Cent Surtax (FY07 and Future)

 $0  $0 $0 $618,102 $618,102 B-30011 Englewood Road and Storm Sewer

 $0  $0 $0 $618,104 $618,104 B-30014 Northwest Road and Storm Sewers

 $0  $0 $0 $458,525 $458,525 B-30035B Shorecrest Roadway Milling & Resurfacing

 $0  $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 B-30168A Silver Bluff Traffic Calming Priority 3 - D4

 $0  $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 B-30305C Gibson Park Area Street Improvements - Street

 $0  $0 $0 $979,360 $979,360 B-30336 Miami River Greenway (5th Street bridge

 $0  $0 $0 $439,001 $439,001 B-30518 Northwest 14th Street Streetscape Project - CIP

 $0  $0 $0 $1,076,873 $1,076,873 B-30588 San Marco Island and Biscayne Island Drainage

 $0  $0 $0 $861,784 $861,784 B-30606N DWNTWN Beautification - North

 $0  $0 $0 $461,784 $461,784 B-30606S DWNTWN Beautification - South

 $0  $0 $0 $1,338,644 $1,338,644 B-30613 District 3 - Miscellaneous Roadway

 $0  $0 $0 $461,905 $461,905 B-30624 Overtown Greenway @ NW 11 Terrace -

 $0  $0 $0 $680,000 $680,000 B-30628 Bird Avenue Road Improvement

 $0  $0 $0 $1,201,546 $1,201,546 B-30630 Palm Grove Road Improvements

 $0  $0 $505,400 $184,291 $689,691 B-30645A Transportation Program Support Services -

 $0  $0 $0 $1,026,000 $1,026,000 B-30645B Transportation Program Support Services -

 $0  $0 $0 $12,000 $12,000 B-30645C Health District Bicycle and Pedestrian

36
 Fund Source Management System

City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Funding Type by Job No.

FUNDING Funding

Total

Approp.

Prior Approp.

2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2

Future Fundin

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

CIP Fees/Revenues (Cont.)

888931 Transit Half-Cent Surtax (FY07 and Future)

 $0  $0 $0 $12,000 $12,000 B-30645D Baywalk Mobility Plan

 $0  $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 B-30646 South Bayshore Drive Roadway and Drainage

 $0  $0 $0 $820,640 $820,640 B-30651 Miami River Greenway from NW 10th to NW

 $0  $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 B-30662D US-1 Median Closures at Bridgeport and SW

 $0  $0 $0 $115,000 $115,000 B-30694A Citywide Bicycle Rack & Signage Program

 $0  $0 $0 $308,156 $308,156 B-30716 Tigertail Resurfacing - D2

 $0  $0 $0 $240,000 $240,000 B-30770 SW 22nd Avenue Medians - US 1 to Coral Way

 $0  $0 $0 $209,239 $209,239 B-30774 West Flagler Area Improvements - D4

 $0  $0 $0 $83,467 $83,467 B-30780 NW 14 Avenue and 28 Street Area Roadway

 $0  $0 $0 $600,000 $600,000 B-30822 Brickell Area Shared Use Path and Roadway

 $0  $0 $0 $180,000 $180,000 B-30823 Fair Isle Area Roadway and Drainage

 $0  $0 $0 $999,976 $999,976 B-30883 NW 12 Avenue / NW 12 Place Roadway

 $0  $0 $0 $1,361,000 $1,361,000 B-30990 Roadway Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 B-30993 SW/NW 17th Avenue Traffic Corridor Study -

 $0  $0 $0 $183,398 $183,398 B-31206 SE 3rd Street Widening

 $0  $0 $0 $50,667 $50,667 B-40268 FEC Quiet Zone Study

 $0  $0 $0 $785,000 $785,000 B-40704A SW 32 Avenue Improvements Additional

 $0  $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 B-43114A Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Phase 29

 $0  $0 $0 $2,426 $2,426 B-50706A Roadway, Drainage and Traffic Improvements

 $0  $0 $27,000 $964,972 $991,972 B-70715 City of Miami Trolley Program - Capital

 $0  $0 $0 $1,230,810 $1,230,810 B-78508 NE 2 Avenue Improvements

 $0  $0 $532,400 $20,074,670 $20,607,070 888931 

888956 Contribution from Special Revenue - SRF 2007

 $0  $0 $0 $211,626 $211,626 B-30194A Manuel Artime ADA Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $401,356 $401,356 B-30596 Dinner Key Marina - Miscellaneous Repair

 $0  $0 $0 $30,000 $30,000 B-30602 Seminole Dinghy Dock Expansion

 $0  $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 B-30604 Miamarina Intracoastal Bulkhead Assessment

 $0  $0 $0 $71,695 $71,695 B-30689 Marine Stadium Bulkhead Replacement

 $0  $0 $554,488 $1,113,510 $1,667,998 B-30706 Miscellaneous Repairs 10% Set Aside

 $0  $0 $0 $76,870 $76,870 B-33514 Marine Stadium Marina Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $600,000 $600,000 B-50722 Little River Waterfront Park

 $0  $0 $0 $155,290 $155,290 B-60464 New Dinner Key Marina Dockmaster Building

 $0  $0 $554,488 $2,710,347 $3,264,835 888956 

888969 Subrogation Auto Claim Revenues

 $0  $0 $112,200 $334,924 $447,124 B-30666 Damaged Vehicle Replacement / Repairs

 $0  $0 $112,200 $334,924 $447,124 888969 

37
 Fund Source Management System

City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Funding Type by Job No.

FUNDING Funding

Total

Approp.

Prior Approp.

2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2

Future Fundin

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

CIP Fees/Revenues (Cont.)

888972 Rickenbacker Marina Rental Revenue

 $0  $0 $0 $146,700 $146,700 B-30706 Miscellaneous Repairs 10% Set Aside

 $0  $0 $0 $146,700 $146,700 888972 

888973 TVM Production Basic Use Fee

 $0  $0 $150,000 $253,500 $403,500 B-30182A Coconut Grove Waterfront Master Plan

 $0  $0 $0 $60,000 $60,000 B-30541B Kennedy Park Floating Dock PHI

 $0  $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 B-30541C Kennedy Park Shoreline Stabilization Phase I

 $0  $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 B-30721 Spoil Island E Restoration and Floating Dock

 $0  $0 $0 $750 $750 B-40171 Coconut Grove Viewing Platform Spoil Island

 $0  $0 $0 $750 $750 B-40172 Coconut Grove Viewing Platform Spoil Island

 $0  $0 $0 $30,000 $30,000 B-75883 Peacock Park Site Improvements

 $0  $0 $150,000 $495,000 $645,000 888973 

 $0 

 $0 $7,699,370 118,433,784 126,133,154 CIP Fees/Revenues

Private Donations / Other

000001 General Fund Operating Budget

 $0  $0 $0 $60,000 $60,000 B-50654 Overtown Stormwater Pump Station Upgrades

 $0  $0 $0 $60,000 $60,000 000001 

000002 Special Revenue Operating Budget

 $0  $0 $0 $290,400 $290,400 B-30262 Citywide Storm Sewer Repair Project

 $0  $0 $0 $411,622 $411,622 B-30346 Traffic Study Reviews - Oracle Project

 $0  $0 $0 $825,000 $825,000 B-30384C Communication UPS Power

 $0  $0 $0 $1,527,022 $1,527,022 000002 

888951 Other Public & Private Contributions

 $0  $0 $0 $616,513 $616,513 B-30374 Virginia Key Rowing Center Improvements

 $0  $0 $0 $1,650 $1,650 B-40171 Coconut Grove Viewing Platform Spoil Island

 $0  $0 $0 $1,650 $1,650 B-40172 Coconut Grove Viewing Platform Spoil Island

 $0  $0 $0 $619,813 $619,813 888951 

888963 Proceeds from Conveyance of Easement

 $0  $0 $0 $1,502,044 $1,502,044 B-30182A Coconut Grove Waterfront Master Plan

 $0  $0 $0 $1,502,044 $1,502,044 888963 

 $0 

 $0 $0 $3,708,879 $3,708,879 Private Donations / Other

 $0 $10,790,000 $22,005,879 378,155,982 410,951,861 Total

38
Section Reports

2 – Funding by cost 

component & Funding 

Source
 Funding by Cost Component & Sources

2011-2012 Capital Improvement Plan

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

FUND: 301-CRA projects

Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

Phase

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Management

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Land Acquisition

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Planning

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,381,982.00 $1,381,982.00 Design

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $6,219,375.00 $6,219,375.00 Construction

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Equipment

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $299,075.00 $299,075.00 Administration

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $2,889,868.00 $2,889,868.00 Other

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $502,700.00 $502,700.00 Construction Engineering

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $11,293,000.00 $11,293,000.00 Total

Name Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

No.

Fund Fund

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $11,046,500.00 $11,046,500.00 CRA Operating Budget 000004

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 3) 385200-3

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $46,500.00 $46,500.00 FIND Waterways Assistance Program FY07 888920

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $11,293,000.00 $11,293,000.00 Total

39
 Funding by Cost Component & Sources

2011-2012 Capital Improvement Plan

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

FUND: 311-General Government

Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

Phase

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $7,564,636.28 $7,564,636.28 Management

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,268,254.37 $1,268,254.37 Land Acquisition

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Planning

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $20,326,252.79 $20,326,252.79 Design

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $2,112,200.00 $1,328,624.60 $3,440,824.60 Construction

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $47,745,689.49 $47,745,689.49 Equipment

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $140,000.00 $140,000.00 Administration

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $200,888.22 $200,888.22 Other

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $50,150.00 $50,150.00 Construction Engineering

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $2,112,200.00 $78,624,495.75 $80,736,695.75 Total

Name Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

No.

Fund Fund

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $2,000,000.00 $0.00 $2,000,000.00 Local Option Gas Tax 356001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $49,055.26 $49,055.26 Impact Fees - Ord 12750 367011

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $316,891.16 $316,891.16 Fire Assessment Fee 375001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $21,592,967.98 $21,592,967.98 Contribution From General Fund 382001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $7,000,000.00 $7,000,000.00 Contribution From General Fund 2003 382007

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $25,162,026.00 $25,162,026.00 Contribution From General Fund 2007 and 382008

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $259,331.35 $259,331.35 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 3) 385200-3

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $650,000.00 $650,000.00 Miami-Dade County DERM Virginia Key 888896

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,000,000.00 $1,000,000.00 Community Development Block Grant 888902

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 FIND Waterways Assistance Program FY07 888920

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,500,000.00 $1,500,000.00 Contribution From Special Revenue 888923

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 Other Public & Private Contributions 888951

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $775,000.00 $775,000.00 Sunshine State Financing Commission 888961

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $19,964,500.00 $19,964,500.00 Sunshine State Financing Commission 888966

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $112,200.00 $334,924.00 $447,124.00 Subrogation Auto Claim Revenues 888969

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 TVM Production Basic Use Fee 888973

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $2,112,200.00 $78,624,495.75 $80,736,695.75 Total

40
 Funding by Cost Component & Sources

2011-2012 Capital Improvement Plan

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

FUND: 312-Public Safety

Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

Phase

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $4,392.19 $4,392.19 Management

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,767,043.06 $1,767,043.06 Land Acquisition

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Planning

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $2,050,383.62 $2,050,383.62 Design

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $10,810,843.43 $10,810,843.43 Construction

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $220,551.76 $9,536,519.62 $9,757,071.38 Equipment

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $412,912.68 $412,912.68 Administration

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Other

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $471,362.49 $471,362.49 Construction Engineering

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $220,551.76 $25,073,457.09 $25,294,008.85 Total

Name Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

No.

Fund Fund

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $825,000.00 $825,000.00 Special Revenue Operating Budget 000002

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,771.00 $1,771.00 1984 Police Bonds 363001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $347,214.03 $347,214.03 Impact Fees 367001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $220,551.76 $109,270.09 $329,821.85 Impact Fees - Ord 12750 367011

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $50,400.00 $50,400.00 1991 Fire Bonds 369100

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $4,350,532.87 $4,350,532.87 Fire Assessment Fee 375001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,311,646.80 $1,311,646.80 Fire Assessment Fee (FY07) 375002

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $498,414.98 $498,414.98 Contribution From General Fund 382001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $2,235,658.80 $2,235,658.80 Contribution From General Fund 2007 and 382008

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,040,400.59 $1,040,400.59 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 1) 385200-1

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $5,990,000.00 $5,990,000.00 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 2) 385200-2

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $3,050,104.93 $3,050,104.93 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 3) 385200-3

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $361,200.00 $361,200.00 1970 Pollution Control G.O.B. (303000) 397001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $656,466.00 $656,466.00 FEMA Federal Assistance to Firefighters 888939

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $4,245,377.00 $4,245,377.00 Sunshine State Financing Commission 888961

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $220,551.76 $25,073,457.09 $25,294,008.85 Total

41
 Funding by Cost Component & Sources

2011-2012 Capital Improvement Plan

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

FUND: 325-Public Facilities

Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

Phase

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $20,000.00 $26,349.35 $46,349.35 Management

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Land Acquisition

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $752,044.46 $752,044.46 Planning

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $950,000.00 $5,209,089.92 $6,159,089.92 Design

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $2,458,765.00 $13,925,241.22 $16,384,006.22 Construction

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $100,000.00 $56,787.00 $156,787.00 Equipment

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $224,595.87 $224,595.87 Administration

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 Other

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $542,937.29 $542,937.29 Construction Engineering

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $3,528,765.00 $20,887,045.11 $24,415,810.11 Total

Name Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

No.

Fund Fund

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $2,497,123.00 $2,497,123.00 American Recovery Reinvestment Act 000007

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $653,786.69 $653,786.69 Contribution From General Fund 382001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $550,627.00 $550,627.00 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 1) 385200-1

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,639,797.16 $1,639,797.16 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 2) 385200-2

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $5,283,616.45 $5,283,616.45 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 3) 385200-3

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $146,826.72 $146,826.72 2002 Homeland Defense Series 1 Interest 385200-8

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $4,460,746.00 $4,460,746.00 FDOT Other 888917

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $800,000.00 $271,250.00 $1,071,250.00 FIND Waterways Assistance Program FY07 888920

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 Federal Aviation Admin. Grant 888927

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $284,569.00 $284,569.00 Greater Miami CVB 888932

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 MDC Building Better Communities GOB 888947

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $554,488.00 $2,110,346.87 $2,664,834.87 Contribution from Special Revenue - SRF 888956

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $8,063.09 $8,063.09 Sunshine State Financing Commission 888960

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $678,048.67 $678,048.67 Sunshine State Financing Commission 888961

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,502,044.46 $1,502,044.46 Proceeds from Conveyance of Easement 888963

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $146,700.00 $146,700.00 Rickenbacker Marina Rental Revenue 888972

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $150,000.00 $253,500.00 $403,500.00 TVM Production Basic Use Fee 888973

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $2,024,277.00 $0.00 $2,024,277.00 Hyatt - Chiller/Cooling Tower 888975

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $3,528,765.00 $20,887,045.11 $24,415,810.11 Total

42
 Funding by Cost Component & Sources

2011-2012 Capital Improvement Plan

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

FUND: 331-Parks and Recreation

Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

Phase

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $5,720.00 $1,351,905.41 $1,357,625.41 Management

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 Land Acquisition

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Planning

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $101,103.00 $14,655,092.41 $14,756,195.41 Design

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $5,690,614.00 $56,209,115.13 $61,899,729.13 Construction

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $197,100.80 $3,414,559.90 $3,611,660.70 Equipment

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $64,300.00 $1,112,525.97 $1,176,825.97 Administration

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $289,653.00 $289,653.00 Other

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $69,877.00 $1,702,625.85 $1,772,502.85 Construction Engineering

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $6,128,714.80 $79,235,477.67 $85,364,192.47 Total

Name Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

No.

Fund Fund

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $5,000,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $6,000,000.00 CRA Operating Budget 000004

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $36,215.00 $36,215.00 Impact Fees 367001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $774,100.80 $1,482,632.24 $2,256,733.04 Impact Fees - Ord 12750 367011

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $119,622.00 $119,622.00 Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond 373001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $83,320.00 $83,320.00 Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond 2008 & 373002

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $30,777.90 $30,777.90 Contribution From General Fund 382001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $2,062,388.82 $2,062,388.82 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 1) 385200-1

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $4,779,448.66 $4,779,448.66 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 2) 385200-2

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $18,277,191.99 $18,277,191.99 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 3) 385200-3

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,412,594.40 $1,412,594.40 2002 Homeland Defense Series 1 Interest 385200-8

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 Florida Recreation Assistance Program 888907

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $90,000.00 $90,000.00 FIND Waterways Assistance Program FY07 888920

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $15,500,000.00 $15,500,000.00 MDC Building Better Communities GOB 888947

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $616,513.00 $616,513.00 Other Public & Private Contributions 888951

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $2,505,560.00 $2,505,560.00 MSEA Contribution to Capital 888955

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $600,000.00 $600,000.00 Contribution from Special Revenue - SRF 888956

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $2,671,069.00 $2,671,069.00 Sunshine State Financing Commission 888960

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $21,959,144.66 $21,959,144.66 Sunshine State Financing Commission 888961

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $260,000.00 $260,000.00 The Children's Trust 888962

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $5,000,000.00 $5,000,000.00 County CDT 888964

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $309,000.00 $309,000.00 Bayfront Park Management Trust 888965

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $240,000.00 $240,000.00 TVM Production Basic Use Fee 888973

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $354,614.00 $0.00 $354,614.00 Miami-Dade County Dept Cultural Affairs 888976

43
 Funding by Cost Component & Sources

2011-2012 Capital Improvement Plan

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

FUND: 331-Parks and Recreation

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $6,128,714.80 $79,235,477.67 $85,364,192.47 Total

44
 Funding by Cost Component & Sources

2011-2012 Capital Improvement Plan

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

FUND: 341-Streets & Sidewalks

Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

Phase

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $372,447.62 $372,447.62 Management

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Land Acquisition

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Planning

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $48,000.00 $18,021,335.14 $18,069,335.14 Design

 $0.00 $0.00  $961,000.00 $4,996,638.00 $91,439,047.78 $97,396,685.78 Construction

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Equipment

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $4,183,259.07 $4,183,259.07 Administration

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $348,702.47 $348,702.47 Other

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $422,980.00 $6,234,605.05 $6,657,585.05 Construction Engineering

 $0.00 $0.00  $961,000.00 $5,467,618.00 120,599,397.13 127,028,015.13 Total

Name Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

No.

Fund Fund

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $411,622.47 $411,622.47 Special Revenue Operating Budget 000002

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,120,080.00 $1,120,080.00 CRA Operating Budget 000004

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $6,732,652.76 $6,732,652.76 Local Option Gas Tax 356001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Parking Surcharge 356003

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $24,256,655.26 $24,256,655.26 Streets Bond Program - Series 1 356005-1

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $47,676,813.82 $47,676,813.82 Streets Bond Program - Series 2 356005-2

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $3,333,707.00 $3,333,707.00 Parking Surcharge 2007 356007

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $177,891.86 $177,891.86 Impact Fees 367001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $399,989.90 $399,989.90 Contribution From General Fund 2007 and 382008

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,259,103.30 $1,259,103.30 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 1) 385200-1

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $4,110,968.95 $4,110,968.95 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 3) 385200-3

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 Community Development Block Grant 888902

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $5,419,618.00 $4,000,000.00 $9,419,618.00 FDOT Transportation Enhancement Program 888913

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $83,537.00 $83,537.00 FDOT Other 888917

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,417,532.00 $1,417,532.00 DRI Transportation Fee 888924

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,543,880.83 $1,543,880.83 Transit Half-Cent Surtax 888930

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $16,559,235.52 $16,559,235.52 Transit Half-Cent Surtax (FY07 and Future) 888931

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $450,000.00 $450,000.00 Miami-Dade County Grant/Contribution 888938

 $0.00 $0.00  $961,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $961,000.00 MDC Building Better Communities GOB 888947

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $48,000.00 $48,000.00 $96,000.00 Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Org 888953

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $6,175,596.46 $6,175,596.46 Economic Stimulus Package 2009 - FDOT 888967

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $392,130.00 $392,130.00 Economic Stimulus 2009 - FD Of Health 888974

45
 Funding by Cost Component & Sources

2011-2012 Capital Improvement Plan

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

FUND: 341-Streets & Sidewalks

 $0.00 $0.00  $961,000.00 $5,467,618.00 120,599,397.13 127,028,015.13 Total

46
 Funding by Cost Component & Sources

2011-2012 Capital Improvement Plan

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

FUND: 343-Mass Transit

Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

Phase

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Management

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Land Acquisition

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Planning

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $485,000.00 $590,996.20 $1,075,996.20 Design

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $27,000.00 $6,784,281.63 $6,811,281.63 Equipment

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $20,400.00 $14,291.00 $34,691.00 Administration

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Other

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction Engineering

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $532,400.00 $7,389,568.83 $7,921,968.83 Total

Name Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

No.

Fund Fund

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,899,150.63 $1,899,150.63 FDOT Other 888917

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $81,788.00 $81,788.00 Transit Half-Cent Surtax 888930

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $532,400.00 $1,199,930.00 $1,732,330.00 Transit Half-Cent Surtax (FY07 and Future) 888931

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $99,418.20 $99,418.20 Miami-Dade County Grant/Contribution 888938

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Downtown Development Agency 888957

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $4,084,282.00 $4,084,282.00 Economic Stimulus Package 2009 - Miami 888968

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $532,400.00 $7,389,568.83 $7,921,968.83 Total

47
 Funding by Cost Component & Sources

2011-2012 Capital Improvement Plan

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

FUND: 351-Sanitary Sewers

Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

Phase

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $589.00 $0.00 $589.00 Management

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Land Acquisition

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Planning

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Design

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $55,000.00 $0.00 $55,000.00 Construction

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Equipment

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $550.00 $0.00 $550.00 Administration

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Other

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $3,861.00 $0.00 $3,861.00 Construction Engineering

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $60,000.00 $0.00 $60,000.00 Total

Name Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

No.

Fund Fund

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $60,000.00 $0.00 $60,000.00 Series 1995 Sanitary Sewer Bonds 371100

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $60,000.00 $0.00 $60,000.00 Total

48
 Funding by Cost Component & Sources

2011-2012 Capital Improvement Plan

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

FUND: 352-Storm Sewers

Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

Phase

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $64,087.45 $64,087.45 Management

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Land Acquisition

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Planning

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $8,460,608.71 $8,460,608.71 Design

 $0.00 $0.00  $9,829,000.00 $1,841,884.99 $19,786,033.04 $31,456,918.03 Construction

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Equipment

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,840,795.71 $1,840,795.71 Administration

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $572,065.00 $572,065.00 Other

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $2,911,416.80 $2,911,416.80 Construction Engineering

 $0.00 $0.00  $9,829,000.00 $1,841,884.99 $33,635,006.71 $45,305,891.70 Total

Name Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

No.

Fund Fund

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 General Fund Operating Budget 000001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $290,400.00 $290,400.00 Special Revenue Operating Budget 000002

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $500,000.00 $1,447,173.00 $1,947,173.00 Local Option Gas Tax 356001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $2,786,035.00 $2,786,035.00 Streets Bond Program - Series 1 356005-1

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $8,690,444.00 $8,690,444.00 Streets Bond Program - Series 2 356005-2

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,000,001.00 $1,000,001.00 Parking Surcharge 2007 356007

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $4,266,788.00 $4,266,788.00 Stormwater Utility Trust Fund 360001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $741,885.00 $5,540,279.00 $6,282,164.00 Stormwater Utility Trust Fund (FY07 and 360003

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $12,087.88 $12,087.88 Impact Fees 367001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $46,357.55 $46,357.55 CIP Misc. Revenue 383001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $714,000.00 $714,000.00 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 1) 385200-1

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $2,571,867.00 $2,571,867.00 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 3) 385200-3

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $867,481.00 $867,481.00 1976 & 78 Storm Sewer G O Bond 399001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 FL Dept of Environmental Protection (FDEP) 888909

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $173,200.00 $173,200.00 FEMA Recovery Assistance 888925

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $91,565.00 $91,565.00 Prior Year Fund Balance 888926

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $434,823.04 $434,823.04 Transit Half-Cent Surtax 888930

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $2,315,505.24 $2,315,505.24 Transit Half-Cent Surtax (FY07 and Future) 888931

 $0.00 $0.00  $9,829,000.00 $0.00 $1,352,000.00 $11,181,000.00 MDC Building Better Communities GOB 888947

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $599,999.99 $0.00 $599,999.99 FEMA 2007 & Future Pre-Disaster 888959

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $475,000.00 $475,000.00 Sunshine State Financing Commission 888961

49
 Funding by Cost Component & Sources

2011-2012 Capital Improvement Plan

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

FUND: 352-Storm Sewers

 $0.00 $0.00  $9,829,000.00 $1,841,884.99 $33,635,006.71 $45,305,891.70 Total

50
 Funding by Cost Component & Sources

2011-2012 Capital Improvement Plan

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

FUND: 353-Solid Waste

Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

Phase

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Management

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Land Acquisition

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Planning

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Design

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $2,113,744.00 $1,418,538.00 $3,532,282.00 Equipment

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Administration

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Other

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction Engineering

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $2,113,744.00 $1,418,538.00 $3,532,282.00 Total

Name Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

No.

Fund Fund

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $2,113,744.00 $1,418,538.00 $3,532,282.00 Contribution From General Fund 2007 and 382008

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $2,113,744.00 $1,418,538.00 $3,532,282.00 Total

51
 Funding by Cost Component & Sources

2011-2012 Capital Improvement Plan

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

FUND: Totals

Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

Phase

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $26,309.00 $9,383,818.30 $9,410,127.30 Management

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $3,535,297.43 $3,535,297.43 Land Acquisition

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $772,044.46 $772,044.46 Planning

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $1,584,103.00 $70,695,740.79 $72,279,843.79 Design

 $0.00 $0.00 $10,790,000.00 $17,155,101.99 199,718,280.20 227,663,382.19 Construction

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $2,658,396.56 $68,956,375.64 $71,614,772.20 Equipment

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $85,250.00 $8,227,455.30 $8,312,705.30 Administration

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $4,451,176.69 $4,451,176.69 Other

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $496,718.00 $12,415,797.48 $12,912,515.48 Construction Engineering

 $0.00 $0.00 $10,790,000.00 $22,005,878.55 378,155,986.29 410,951,864.84 Total

Name Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

No.

Fund Fund

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 General Fund Operating Budget 000001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,527,022.47 $1,527,022.47 Special Revenue Operating Budget 000002

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $5,000,000.00 $13,166,580.00 $18,166,580.00 CRA Operating Budget 000004

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $2,497,123.00 $2,497,123.00 American Recovery Reinvestment Act 000007

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $2,500,000.00 $8,179,825.76 $10,679,825.76 Local Option Gas Tax 356001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Parking Surcharge 356003

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $27,042,690.26 $27,042,690.26 Streets Bond Program - Series 1 356005-1

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $56,367,257.82 $56,367,257.82 Streets Bond Program - Series 2 356005-2

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $4,333,708.00 $4,333,708.00 Parking Surcharge 2007 356007

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $4,266,788.00 $4,266,788.00 Stormwater Utility Trust Fund 360001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $741,885.00 $5,540,279.00 $6,282,164.00 Stormwater Utility Trust Fund (FY07 and 360003

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,771.00 $1,771.00 1984 Police Bonds 363001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $573,408.77 $573,408.77 Impact Fees 367001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $994,652.56 $1,640,957.59 $2,635,610.15 Impact Fees - Ord 12750 367011

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $50,400.00 $50,400.00 1991 Fire Bonds 369100

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $60,000.00 $0.00 $60,000.00 Series 1995 Sanitary Sewer Bonds 371100

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $119,622.00 $119,622.00 Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond 373001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $83,320.00 $83,320.00 Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond 2008 & 373002

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $4,667,424.03 $4,667,424.03 Fire Assessment Fee 375001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,311,646.80 $1,311,646.80 Fire Assessment Fee (FY07) 375002

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $22,775,947.55 $22,775,947.55 Contribution From General Fund 382001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $7,000,000.00 $7,000,000.00 Contribution From General Fund 2003 382007

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $2,113,744.00 $29,216,212.70 $31,329,956.70 Contribution From General Fund 2007 and 382008

52
 Funding by Cost Component & Sources

2011-2012 Capital Improvement Plan

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

FUND: Totals

Name Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

No.

Fund Fund

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $46,357.55 $46,357.55 CIP Misc. Revenue 383001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $5,626,519.71 $5,626,519.71 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 1) 385200-1

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $12,409,245.82 $12,409,245.82 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 2) 385200-2

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $33,753,080.67 $33,753,080.67 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 3) 385200-3

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,559,421.12 $1,559,421.12 2002 Homeland Defense Series 1 Interest 385200-8

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $361,200.00 $361,200.00 1970 Pollution Control G.O.B. (303000) 397001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $867,481.00 $867,481.00 1976 & 78 Storm Sewer G O Bond 399001

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $650,000.00 $650,000.00 Miami-Dade County DERM Virginia Key 888896

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,400,000.00 $1,400,000.00 Community Development Block Grant 888902

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 Florida Recreation Assistance Program 888907

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 FL Dept of Environmental Protection (FDEP) 888909

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $5,419,618.00 $4,000,000.00 $9,419,618.00 FDOT Transportation Enhancement Program 888913

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $6,443,433.63 $6,443,433.63 FDOT Other 888917

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $800,000.00 $422,750.00 $1,222,750.00 FIND Waterways Assistance Program FY07 888920

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,500,000.00 $1,500,000.00 Contribution From Special Revenue 888923

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,417,532.00 $1,417,532.00 DRI Transportation Fee 888924

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $173,200.00 $173,200.00 FEMA Recovery Assistance 888925

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $91,565.00 $91,565.00 Prior Year Fund Balance 888926

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 Federal Aviation Admin. Grant 888927

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $2,060,491.87 $2,060,491.87 Transit Half-Cent Surtax 888930

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $532,400.00 $20,074,670.76 $20,607,070.76 Transit Half-Cent Surtax (FY07 and Future) 888931

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $284,569.00 $284,569.00 Greater Miami CVB 888932

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $549,418.20 $549,418.20 Miami-Dade County Grant/Contribution 888938

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $656,466.00 $656,466.00 FEMA Federal Assistance to Firefighters 888939

 $0.00 $0.00 $10,790,000.00 $0.00 $17,102,000.00 $27,892,000.00 MDC Building Better Communities GOB 888947

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $619,813.00 $619,813.00 Other Public & Private Contributions 888951

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $48,000.00 $48,000.00 $96,000.00 Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Org 888953

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $2,505,560.00 $2,505,560.00 MSEA Contribution to Capital 888955

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $554,488.00 $2,710,346.87 $3,264,834.87 Contribution from Special Revenue - SRF 888956

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Downtown Development Agency 888957

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $599,999.99 $0.00 $599,999.99 FEMA 2007 & Future Pre-Disaster 888959

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $2,679,132.09 $2,679,132.09 Sunshine State Financing Commission 888960

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $28,132,570.33 $28,132,570.33 Sunshine State Financing Commission 888961

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $260,000.00 $260,000.00 The Children's Trust 888962

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $1,502,044.46 $1,502,044.46 Proceeds from Conveyance of Easement 888963

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $5,000,000.00 $5,000,000.00 County CDT 888964

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $309,000.00 $309,000.00 Bayfront Park Management Trust 888965

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $19,964,500.00 $19,964,500.00 Sunshine State Financing Commission 888966

53
 Funding by Cost Component & Sources

2011-2012 Capital Improvement Plan

Active & Future

CIP Projects Only

FUND: Totals

Name Funding

Total Prior

Years

Current

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 

Future Funding 

No.

Fund Fund

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $6,175,596.46 $6,175,596.46 Economic Stimulus Package 2009 - FDOT 888967

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $4,084,282.00 $4,084,282.00 Economic Stimulus Package 2009 - Miami 888968

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $112,200.00 $334,924.00 $447,124.00 Subrogation Auto Claim Revenues 888969

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $146,700.00 $146,700.00 Rickenbacker Marina Rental Revenue 888972

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $150,000.00 $495,000.00 $645,000.00 TVM Production Basic Use Fee 888973

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $392,130.00 $392,130.00 Economic Stimulus 2009 - FD Of Health 888974

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $2,024,277.00 $0.00 $2,024,277.00 Hyatt - Chiller/Cooling Tower 888975

 $0.00 $0.00  $0.00 $354,614.00 $0.00 $354,614.00 Miami-Dade County Dept Cultural Affairs 888976

 $0.00 $0.00 $10,790,000.00 $22,005,878.55 378,155,986.29 410,951,864.84 Total

54
Section Reports

3 – Cost Estimates versus 

Available Funding
City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Dist. Estimate ($) Phase

CIP Projects Only

 Cost Estimates versus Available Funding

Active & Future

B-No. Client Project

Total Cost Total 

Funds ($) Status 

301-CRA projects

 6,000,000 6,000,000 B-30394 Community Redevelopment

Agency

North 14 St. Multi Media Entertainment

District Streetscape 92-686001

2 Active 5-Constructio

 3,500,000 3,500,000 B-30579 Community Redevelopment

Agency

Old Fire Station No. 2 Restoration - CRA

92-686001

2 Active 5-Constructio

 93,000 93,000 B-30731 Community Redevelopment

Agency

Miami Women's Club Baywalk Project - CRA

92-686001

2 Active 3-Design 

 2,000,000 200,000 B-30538B Community Redevelopment

Agency

Museum Park Environmental Remediation -

92-686001

1,2,3,4,5 Active 3-Design 

 1,987,714 1,500,000 B-40169 Community Redevelopment

Agency

300 NW 11 Street Community Center - CRA

92-689001

5 Active 3-Design 

301-CRA projects 13,580,714 11,293,000 

311-General Government

 1,015,000 1,015,000 B-30365E Community Development Coral Way NET Office Remodeling - CD

91-02994

3 Active 3-Design 

 6,770 6,770 B-30365J Building Department Beckham Hall Fire Damage Repair 1 Future 8-Future 

 3,268,254 3,268,254 B-30551 Public Works Public Works Maintenance Yard 1,2,3,4,5 Active 3-Design 

 447,124 447,124 B-30666 General Services

Administration

Damaged Vehicle Replacement / Repairs 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

 17,065 17,065 B-30996 General Services

Administration

MRC Emergency Repairs 1,2,3,4,5 Future 8-Future 

 1,400,000 1,400,000 B-35002 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Virginia Key Landfill Assessment 2 Active 5-Constructio

 259,331 259,331 B-39910 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Quality of Life District 2 - Various Projects 2 Future 8-Future 

 25,000 25,000 B-70416 General Services

Administration

Emergency Radio Equipment replacement 1,2,3,4,5 Future 8-Future 

 11,876 11,876 B-74204 General Services

Administration

Emergency Dispatch Furniture 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

 48,535 48,535 B-74205B General Services

Administration

GSA Fleet Maintenance Garage Expansion 1 Active 5-Constructio

 24,239,737 24,239,737 B-74220 General Services

Administration

Police Vehicle Replacement 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

 25,474,457 25,474,457 B-74609 Information Technology ERP Integration System 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

55
City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Dist. Estimate ($) Phase

CIP Projects Only

 Cost Estimates versus Available Funding

Active & Future

B-No. Client Project

Total Cost Total 

Funds ($) Status 

311-General Government

 9,116,151 9,116,151 B-74610 Information Technology Technology Infrastructure 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

 186,819 25,000 B-30365H General Services

Administration

Generator for City Hall 1,2,3,4,5 Active 4-Bid (JOC) 

 65,490 65,490 B-30994 Public Facilities City of Miami Impact Fee Study - Citywide 1,2,3,4,5 Future 8-Future 

 12,200 9,900 B-40171 City Manager Coconut Grove Viewing Platform Spoil Island

C - D2

2 Future 8-Future 

 12,200 9,900 B-40172 City Manager Coconut Grove Viewing Platform Spoil Island

E - D2

2 Future 8-Future 

 3,619,887 3,260,268 B-74200 General Services

Administration

Citywide General Fleet Replacement 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

 7,174,921 2,920,682 B-74606 Information Technology Upgrade PC Software & Hardware 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

 7,913,018 6,316,151 B-74614 Information Technology Land Management System 1,2,3,4,5 Active 3-Design 

 4,100,000 2,800,000 B-74617 Information Technology IT Modernization 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

 700,000 0 B-30365C Community Development City Property Building Maintenance 1,2,3,4,5 Future 8-Future 

 54,977 0 B-70415 General Services

Administration

MRC Security System Harding - UASI Funded

18-180011

2 Active 3-Design 

 300,000 0 B-74219 General Services

Administration

Property Maintenance Building Improvements 1,2,3,4,5 Future 8-Future 

311-General Government 89,468,815 80,736,695 

312-Public Safety

 1,005,800 1,005,800 B-30384C Police Communication UPS Power 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 322,845 322,845 B-30997 Police Police Swat Vehicles 1,2,3,4,5 Future 8-Future 

 5,076,843 5,076,843 B-60454 Fire Rescue Fire Station #14 (New) 4 Future 2-Pre-Design 

 74,619 74,619 B-70102A Fire Rescue Fire Station No. 6 Office Building - Structural

Analysis

5 Active 7-On-Hold 

 179,403 179,403 B-70104 Fire Rescue Fire Station No. 10 Restroom Remodeling 1 Active 3-Design 

 230,000 230,000 B-70105 Fire Rescue Refurbishing of Existing Apparatus 1,2,3,4,5 Future 8-Future 

 158,123 158,123 B-70106 Fire Rescue Firefighting Equipment and Gear 1,2,3,4,5 Future 8-Future 

 820,580 820,580 B-70411 Fire Rescue Fire Rescue Personal Protective Equipment 1,2,3,4,5 Active 3-Design 

 120,865 120,865 B-72801 Fire Rescue Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) 1,2,3,4,5 Active 3-Design 

 4,022,960 4,022,960 B-72802 Fire Rescue Fire Stations & Other Fire Facilities 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

 3,767,249 3,767,249 B-72813 Fire Rescue Defense and Security Equipment Acquisition 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

56
City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Dist. Estimate ($) Phase

CIP Projects Only

 Cost Estimates versus Available Funding

Active & Future

B-No. Client Project

Total Cost Total 

Funds ($) Status 

312-Public Safety

 240,321 240,321 B-72915 Police Police Headquarters Helipad and Roof

Replacement

1,2,3,4,5 Active 4-Bid (JOC) 

 6,150,000 843,082 B-30554 Police Police Radios Replacement 1,2,3,4,5 Active 3-Design 

 6,275,200 898,123 B-60351 Fire Rescue Fire Station #10 (New) 1 Future 8-Future 

 5,168,420 5,084,496 B-60453A Fire Rescue Fire Station #13 2 Active 5-Constructio

 343,610 68,722 B-70418 Fire Rescue FEMA Assistance to Firefighters Program

FY2011

1,2,3,4,5 Future 8-Future 

 713,417 540,837 B-72803 Fire Rescue Fire Station Equipment and Furniture

Replacement

1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

 1,209,200 351,200 B-72804 Fire Rescue Phone and Radio Equipment Upgrades 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

 950,000 93,461 B-72805 Fire Rescue Computer Equipment and Software Upgrades 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

 1,649,658 667,658 B-72808 Fire Rescue Light Fleet Replacement 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

 660,316 326,816 B-72809 Fire Rescue Large Firefighting Equipment 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

 1,600,000 400,000 B-72915A Police Police Headquarters Helipad and Roof

Replacement

1,2,3,4,5 Future 8-Future 

 622,481 0 B-30709 Fire Rescue Fire Station Hardening / Facility Apparatus

Room Doors

1,2,3,4,5 Future 8-Future 

 0 0 B-70103 Fire Rescue Fire Department Training Burn Tower / Search

Facility & Props

1,2,3,4,5 Active 7-On-Hold 

 3,035,000 0 B-72811 Fire Rescue Replace Existing Fire Engines 1,2,3,4,5 Future 8-Future 

312-Public Safety 44,396,914 25,294,008 

325-Public Facilities

 363,831 363,831 B-30194A Public Facilities Manuel Artime ADA Improvements 3 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 1,311,253 1,311,253 B-30325 Public Facilities Miamarina Emergency Pier Repairs 2 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 250,000 250,000 B-30531 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Dorsey Memorial Library Restoration 2 Active 7-On-Hold 

 105,000 105,000 B-30546A Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Gusman Hall Improvements - FY2012 1,2,3,4,5 Future 8-Future 

 401,356 401,356 B-30596 Public Facilities Dinner Key Marina - Miscellaneous Repair 2 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 90,000 90,000 B-30604 Public Facilities Miamarina Intracoastal Bulkhead Assessment 2 Active 1-Study 

 250,000 250,000 B-30696 Public Facilities Miamarina Pier A, B & C Fire Line Repairs 2 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 4,521,400 4,521,400 B-40181 Public Facilities James L. Knight Center Chiller & Cooling 2 Active 5-Constructio

57
City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Dist. Estimate ($) Phase

CIP Projects Only

 Cost Estimates versus Available Funding

Active & Future

B-No. Client Project

Total Cost Total 

Funds ($) Status 

325-Public Facilities

Tower Oracle Project 41-410004

 484,978 484,978 B-70414 Public Facilities James L. Knight Center / Hyatt- Fire Alarm

System Replacement

2 Future 8-Future 

 451,566 451,566 B-70500 Public Facilities Development/UDP Consultants - Watson Is,

others

2,5 Active 7-On-Hold 

 47,179,389 1,905,544 B-30182A Public Facilities Coconut Grove Waterfront Master Plan

Implementation - Phase I

2 Active 3-Design 

 60,000 30,000 B-30602 Public Facilities Seminole Dinghy Dock Expansion 2 Future 8-Future 

 511,716 350,000 B-30688 Public Facilities Marine Stadium Restoration 2 Active 7-On-Hold 

 2,094,393 1,106,603 B-30689 Public Facilities Marine Stadium Bulkhead Replacement 2 Active 3-Design 

 1,853,459 1,853,447 B-30706 Public Facilities Miscellaneous Repairs 10% Set Aside 2 Future 8-Future 

 1,315,550 385,645 B-33514 Public Facilities Marine Stadium Marina Improvements 2 Active 3-Design 

 33,180,900 1,740,007 B-40180 Public Facilities Marine Stadium Marina at Virginia Key 2 Active 2-Pre-Design 

 4,725,960 3,446,441 B-60464 Public Facilities New Dinner Key Marina Dockmaster Building 2 Active 3-Design 

 10,000,000 423,405 B-70100 Public Facilities Gusman Hall Improvements / Repairs 2 Future 8-Future 

 647,190 150,000 B-75001 Public Facilities Watson Island Infrastructure 2 Future 8-Future 

 8,326,357 4,795,330 B-75005 Economic Development Watson Island Aviation & Visitor Center 2 Active 5-Constructio

 2,600,000 0 B-35000 Public Facilities Watson Island Public Park Improvements 2 Future 8-Future 

 287,000 0 B-35003 Public Facilities Allapattah Community Elderly Center 1 Future 8-Future 

 0 0 B-39903 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Waterfront Improvements Citywide 1,2,3,4,5 Future 8-Future 

325-Public Facilities 121,011,301 24,415,810 

331-Parks and Recreation

 29,346 29,346 B-30078 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Homeland Defense Legal Services Support 1,2,3,4,5 Future 8-Future 

 852,128 852,128 B-30134A Parks and Recreation Bryan Park New Tennis/Community Center 4 Active 3-Design 

 1,306,765 1,306,765 B-30174 Virginia Key Park Trust Virginia Key Beach Park Historic Restoration

Phase 2

2 Active 5-Constructio

 9,939,521 9,939,521 B-30305B Parks and Recreation Gibson Park New Construction (Partially

Funded by CRA 92-689001)

5 Active 5-Constructio

 22,020 22,020 B-30305D Parks and Recreation Gibson Park Furniture - D5 5 Active 5-Constructio

 616,513 616,513 B-30374 Parks and Recreation Virginia Key Rowing Center Improvements 2 Active 2-Pre-Design 

58
City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Dist. Estimate ($) Phase

CIP Projects Only

 Cost Estimates versus Available Funding

Active & Future

B-No. Client Project

Total Cost Total 

Funds ($) Status 

331-Parks and Recreation

 20,527,127 20,527,127 B-30508 Virginia Key Park Trust Virginia Key Beach Park Museum 2 Active 2-Pre-Design 

 397,100 397,100 B-30541D Parks and Recreation Citywide Park Equipments & Site

Improvements FY12

1,2,3,4,5 Active 3-Design 

 2,385,560 2,385,560 B-30566A Parks and Recreation Melreese Golf Training Center 1 Active 5-Constructio

 42,048 42,048 B-30685A Parks and Recreation 1814 Brickell Avenue Park

PlaygroundEquipment

2 Active 4-Bid 

 8,500 8,500 B-30711 Parks and Recreation Triangle Park Swings - D3 3 Active 7-On-Hold 

 53,000 53,000 B-30772 Parks and Recreation Bay of Pigs Park Lighting - D4 4 Active 2-Pre-Design 

 116,781 116,781 B-30800 Parks and Recreation Fern Isle / PBA Park Improvements Project -

D1

1 Future 8-Future 

 50,026 50,026 B-30801 Parks and Recreation Manatee Bend Park Shoreline Improvements -

D2

2 Future 8-Future 

 50,000 50,000 B-30802 Parks and Recreation Pallot Park Shoreline Improvements - D2 2 Future 8-Future 

 14,123 14,123 B-30820 Parks and Recreation Legion Park Boat Ramp Repairs - D2 2 Future 8-Future 

 122,000 122,000 B-30821 Parks and Recreation Coral Gate Park Furniture, Security System

and Miscellaneous Improvements - D4

4 Active 5-Constructio

 600,000 600,000 B-30882 Parks and Recreation African Square Park - Splash Park - D5 5 Active 2-Pre-Design 

 75,000 75,000 B-30885 Parks and Recreation Freedom Garden Statue Rehabilitation - D5 5 Active 5-Constructio

 925,061 925,061 B-30886 Parks and Recreation Lummus Landing Square - D5 5 Active 3-Design 

 377,000 377,000 B-30995 Parks and Recreation Virginia Key Bike Trail Building - D2 2 Active 2-Pre-Design 

 2,127,159 2,127,159 B-35806 Parks and Recreation Curtis Park New Pool Facility 1 Active 1-Study 

 45,000 45,000 B-35868A Parks and Recreation Robert King High Park Furniture - D4 4 Active 5-Constructio

 987,988 987,988 B-39910E Parks and Recreation District 2 Quality of Life Park Improvements 2 Active 5-Constructio

 55,945 55,945 B-40170 Parks and Recreation Irrigation System at Kennedy Dog Park - D2 2 Active 2-Pre-Design 

 309,000 309,000 B-40173 Bayfront Park Management

Trust

Bayfront Park Electrical Repairs 2 Active 3-Design 

 150,000 150,000 B-75823 Parks and Recreation Biscayne Park Site Improvements 2 Future 8-Future 

 250,000 250,000 B-75830A Parks and Recreation Blanche Park Master Plan Improvements 2 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 830,124 830,124 B-75883 Parks and Recreation Peacock Park Site Improvements 2 Active 3-Design 

 15,000 15,000 B-75973 Parks and Recreation Oakland Grove Park Playground Equipment 5 Future 8-Future 

 2,000,000 2,000,000 B-78502A Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Museum of Science - Development in

Bicentennial Park - Phase 2

1,2,3,4,5 Active 3-Design 

59
City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Dist. Estimate ($) Phase

CIP Projects Only

 Cost Estimates versus Available Funding

Active & Future

B-No. Client Project

Total Cost Total 

Funds ($) Status 

331-Parks and Recreation

 16,339,250 11,756,367 B-30538 Parks and Recreation Museum Park - Partially Funded by CRA

92-686001

1,2,3,4,5 Active 3-Design 

 5,293,595 4,896,494 B-30541 Parks and Recreation Citywide Park Equipment & Site

Improvements

1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

 252,830 130,001 B-30541B Parks and Recreation Kennedy Park Floating Dock PHI 2 Active 4-Bid 

 997,424 186,001 B-30541C Parks and Recreation Kennedy Park Shoreline Stabilization Phase I 2 Active 3-Design 

 1,278,018 215,348 B-30547E Parks and Recreation Parks ADA Modifications - District 2 2 Active 4-Bid (JOC) 

 434,719 96,917 B-30547F Parks and Recreation Parks ADA Modifications - District 3 - Jose

Marti Park

3 Active 4-Bid (JOC) 

 607,351 491,147 B-30547G Parks and Recreation Parks ADA Modifications - District 4 -

Shenadoah Park

4 Active 3-Design 

 517,816 211,137 B-30547H Parks and Recreation Parks ADA Modifications - District 5 5 Active 4-Bid (JOC) 

 3,519,500 200,000 B-30585 Parks and Recreation Morningside Park New Pool Facility 2 Future 8-Future 

 1,104,614 954,614 B-30671 Parks and Recreation Caribbean Marketplace Renovation 5 Active 4-Bid 

 2,252,675 435,471 B-30690 Parks and Recreation West End Park New Community Building 4 Active 3-Design 

 416,400 90,000 B-30721 Parks and Recreation Spoil Island E Restoration and Floating Dock 2 Active 3-Design 

 1,550,187 1,312,797 B-35812A Parks and Recreation Duarte Park Building Renovation, Splash Park

and Sign

1 Active 5-Constructio

 235,750 222,033 B-35838 Parks and Recreation Kennedy Park Restroom Building

Improvements

2 Active 3-Design 

 3,457,462 2,088,897 B-35853A Parks and Recreation Virrick Park New Pool Facility 2 Active 7-On-Hold 

 1,963,181 1,943,634 B-35865A Parks and Recreation Coral Gate Park Community Building 4 Active 5-Constructio

 7,838,562 5,876,805 B-35883A Parks and Recreation Hadley Park New Youth Center 5 Active 3-Design 

 7,606,074 7,605,466 B-35887 Parks and Recreation Moore Park New Construction 5 Active 3-Design 

 1,272,223 771,223 B-35904 Parks and Recreation Neighborhood Parks Improv. Contingencies -

ADA Modifications

1,2,3,4,5 Future 8-Future 

 675,000 600,000 B-50722 Parks and Recreation Little River Waterfront Park 2 Future 8-Future 

 346,250 0 B-30587 Parks and Recreation Virginia Key Beach Swimming Area 2 Future 8-Future 

 225,770 0 B-35844 Parks and Recreation Lummus Park Historic Building Restoration 5 Future 8-Future 

 0 0 B-35858 Parks and Recreation Kinloch Park - Senior Community Center 1 Active 7-On-Hold 

 432,000 0 B-35872 Parks and Recreation African Square Park Rec. Bldg. Improvements 5 Future 8-Future 

331-Parks and Recreation 103,896,491 85,364,192 

60
City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Dist. Estimate ($) Phase

CIP Projects Only

 Cost Estimates versus Available Funding

Active & Future

B-No. Client Project

Total Cost Total 

Funds ($) Status 

341-Streets & Sidewalks

 1,557,530 1,557,530 B-30130 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Miami River Greenway SW 1st Court to South

Miami Avenue - D2

2 Active 5-Constructio

 620,841 620,841 B-30168A Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Silver Bluff Traffic Calming Priority 3 - D4 4 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 100,000 100,000 B-30178 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Design District/FEC 5 Future 8-Future 

 1,000,000 1,000,000 B-30305C Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Gibson Park Area Street Improvements - Street

Component of B-30305B

5 Active 5-Constructio

 2,256,640 2,256,640 B-30336 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Miami River Greenway (5th Street bridge

exten.)

3 Active 4-Bid 

 411,622 411,622 B-30346 Transportation & Transit Traffic Study Reviews - Oracle Project

35-110007

1,2,3,4,5 Active 1-Study 

 250,692 250,692 B-30377A Capital Improvement Program

Admin

District 1 - Sidewalk Repairs and ADA 1 Active 5-Constructio

 250,691 250,691 B-30377B Capital Improvement Program

Admin

District 2 - Sidewalk Repairs & ADA 2 Active 5-Constructio

 250,691 250,691 B-30377C Public Works District 3 - Sidewalk Repairs and ADA 3 Active 7-On-Hold 

 250,691 250,691 B-30377D Capital Improvement Program

Admin

District 4 - Sidewalk Repairs & ADA 4 Active 5-Constructio

 250,691 250,691 B-30377E Capital Improvement Program

Admin

District 5 - Sidewalk Repairs & ADA 5 Active 5-Constructio

 2,500,000 2,500,000 B-30500 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Civic Center NW 14th Street 1,2,3,4,5 Active 3-Design 

 961,000 961,000 B-30504 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Linear Parks, Greenways and Baywalk

Improvements

1,2,3,4,5 Future 8-Future 

 2,671,422 2,671,422 B-30542A Capital Improvement Program

Admin

US1 Roadway Improvements and Wall

Replacement Phase II

2 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 3,150,565 3,150,565 B-30606 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

DWNTWN Beautification Project Phase I 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 498,780 498,780 B-30606D Capital Improvement Program

Admin

DWNTWN Beautification - Design Phase 1,2,3,4,5 Active 3-Design 

 4,475,915 4,475,915 B-30606L Capital Improvement Program

Admin

DWNTWN Beautification (Lighting) 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 7,817,426 7,817,426 B-30606N Capital Improvement Program DWNTWN Beautification - North 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Const. (JOC

61
City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Dist. Estimate ($) Phase

CIP Projects Only

 Cost Estimates versus Available Funding

Active & Future

B-No. Client Project

Total Cost Total 

Funds ($) Status 

341-Streets & Sidewalks

Admin

 5,090,853 5,090,853 B-30606S Capital Improvement Program

Admin

DWNTWN Beautification - South 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

 111,418 111,418 B-30611 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

District 1 - Miscellaneous Roadway

Improvements

1 Future 8-Future 

 10,158,973 10,158,973 B-30613 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

District 3 - Miscellaneous Roadway

Improvements

3 Future 8-Future 

 36,381 36,381 B-30614 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

District 4 - Miscellaneous Roadway

Improvements

4 Future 8-Future 

 1,809,194 1,809,194 B-30615 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

District 5 - Miscellaneous Roadway

Improvements

5 Future 8-Future 

 1,960,508 1,960,508 B-30628 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Bird Avenue Road Improvement 2 Active 3-Design 

 3,851,337 3,851,337 B-30630 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Palm Grove Road Improvements 2 Active 5-Constructio

 1,368,535 1,368,535 B-30643 Parks and Recreation Lummus Park Landing Project - Street Project 5 Active 3-Design 

 1,026,000 1,026,000 B-30645B Transportation & Transit Transportation Program Support Services -

Transportation Professional Services

1,2,3,4,5 Active 3-Design 

 60,000 60,000 B-30645C Transportation & Transit Health District Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility

Study

1,2,3,4,5 Active 1-Study 

 60,000 60,000 B-30645D Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Baywalk Mobility Plan 2 Active 1-Study 

 3,160,379 3,160,379 B-30651 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Miami River Greenway from NW 10th to NW

12th Ave.

3 Active 3-Design 

 330,000 330,000 B-30662D Capital Improvement Program

Admin

US-1 Median Closures at Bridgeport and SW

30 Ct - D2

2 Active 7-On-Hold 

 3,099,637 3,099,637 B-30687 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Coconut Grove Business Improvement District

- Street Improvements

2 Active 4-Bid (JOC) 

 35,892 35,892 B-30693 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Neighborhood Traffic Calming

Improvements-D4-Study

4 Active 1-Study 

 392,130 392,130 B-30694 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

ARRA Citywide Bicycle Rack & Signage

Program

1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 115,000 115,000 B-30694A Transportation & Transit Citywide Bicycle Rack & Signage Program 1,2,3,4,5 Future 8-Future 

 721,100 721,100 B-30699 Capital Improvement Program Beacom Project Area Improvements 3 Active 7-On-Hold 

62
City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Dist. Estimate ($) Phase

CIP Projects Only

 Cost Estimates versus Available Funding

Active & Future

B-No. Client Project

Total Cost Total 

Funds ($) Status 

341-Streets & Sidewalks

Admin

 190,000 190,000 B-30703 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Bob Hope Dr. Between NW 20th Street to NW

17th Street - D1

1 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 240,000 240,000 B-30704 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NW 14th Avenue Between NW 24th Street to

NW 27th Street - D1

1 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 360,000 360,000 B-30705 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NW 24th Street Between NW 14th Avenue

and NW 17th Avenue - D1

1 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 200,000 200,000 B-30717 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Coral Gate Community Improvements - D4 4 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 859,000 859,000 B-30718 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

I-95 South Miami Terminal Street

Improvements - D2

2 Active 3-Design 

 135,000 135,000 B-30719 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

SW 16th Avenue from Coral Way to 20 Street

- D3

3 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 311,000 311,000 B-30722 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NW 31st Street Roadway Improvement Project

- D1

1 Active 3-Design 

 749,999 749,999 B-30725 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NW 11th Street Roadway Improvement Project

- D1

1 Active 5-Constructio

 888,000 888,000 B-30726 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NW 60th Avenue Roadway Improvement

Project - D1

1 Active 4-Bid 

 1,810,000 1,810,000 B-30727 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NW 18th Avenue Roadway Improvement

Project - D1

1 Active 3-Design 

 110,000 110,000 B-30728 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NW 17th Court Roadway Improvement Project

- D1

1 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 250,000 250,000 B-30729 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NW 17th Terrace Roadway Improvement

Project - D1

1 Active 3-Design 

 75,000 75,000 B-30730 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NW 4th Terrace Roadway Improvement

Project - D1

1 Active 3-Design 

 756,247 756,247 B-30732 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NW 9th Street Roadway Improvement Project

- D1

1 Active 5-Constructio

 198,000 198,000 B-30741 Transportation & Transit SW 16 Avenue Roadway & Drainage

Improvements - D3

3 Active 3-Design 

 250,000 250,000 B-30743 Transportation & Transit SW 28th Road Roadway & Drainage

Improvements - D3

3 Active 3-Design 

 402,000 402,000 B-30745 Transportation & Transit NW 8th Street Roadway and Drainage 3 Active 4-Bid (JOC) 

63
City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Dist. Estimate ($) Phase

CIP Projects Only

 Cost Estimates versus Available Funding

Active & Future

B-No. Client Project

Total Cost Total 

Funds ($) Status 

341-Streets & Sidewalks

Improvements

 180,000 180,000 B-30746 Transportation & Transit NW 14th Court Roadway & Drainage

Improvements - D3

3 Active 4-Bid (JOC) 

 400,000 400,000 B-30747 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

SW 13th Street Roadway & Drainage

Improvements - D3

3 Active 3-Design 

 600,000 600,000 B-30760 Transportation & Transit SW 17th Avenue Roadway & Drainage

Improvements - D3 & D4

3,4 Future 8-Future 

 400,000 400,000 B-30770 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

SW 22nd Avenue Medians - US 1 to Coral

Way - D4

4 Active 1-Study 

 324,670 324,670 B-30771 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Traffic Calming SW 6th Street Project - D4 4 Active 3-Design 

 100,000 100,000 B-30773 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Martin Luther King (MLK) Blvd / I-95 Area

Improvements - D5

5 Active 3-Design 

 414,388 414,388 B-30775 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Shenandoah Area Improvements - D4 4 Active 3-Design 

 739,493 739,493 B-30781 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NW 11 Street from 27 to 37 Avenue Area

Roadway Improvements - D1

1 Future 8-Future 

 600,000 600,000 B-30822 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Brickell Area Shared Use Path and Roadway

Improvements

2 Future 8-Future 

 180,000 180,000 B-30823 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Fair Isle Area Roadway and Drainage

Improvements - D2

2 Active 4-Bid (JOC) 

 999,975 999,975 B-30883 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NW 12 Avenue / NW 12 Place Roadway

Improvements

5 Active 3-Design 

 75,000 75,000 B-30884 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NW 62 Street West of I-95 Roadway

Improvements - D5

5 Future 8-Future 

 1,361,000 1,361,000 B-30990 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Roadway Improvements 1,2,3,4,5 Future 8-Future 

 2,416,500 2,416,500 B-30991 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Citywide Roadway Improvements 1,2,3,4,5 Future 8-Future 

 200,000 200,000 B-30993 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

SW/NW 17th Avenue Traffic Corridor Study -

Citywide

1,2,3,4,5 Active 1-Study 

 1,417,532 1,417,532 B-31220 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Downtown DRI Transportation Component 2 Active 1-Study 

 100,000 100,000 B-39910C Capital Improvement Program North Venetian Drive Lighting (District 2 2 Active 3-Design 

64
City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Dist. Estimate ($) Phase

CIP Projects Only

 Cost Estimates versus Available Funding

Active & Future

B-No. Client Project

Total Cost Total 

Funds ($) Status 

341-Streets & Sidewalks

Admin QOL)

 33,132 33,132 B-39910I Public Works Brickell Avenue Decorative Pedestrian

Crosswalk

2 Active 2-Pre-Design 

 25,000 25,000 B-39910K Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Bayside Historic Sign - D2 2 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 3,196,465 3,196,465 B-39911 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Venetian Causeway Improvements 2 Active 4-Bid 

 100,000 100,000 B-40168 Public Works South Bayshore Drive from Aviation Avenue

to Kirk Avenue - D2 PW

2 Active 2-Pre-Design 

 60,000 60,000 B-40174 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Royal Road - Milling and Resurfacing - D2 2 Active 5-Constructio

 85,996 85,996 B-40183 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Belle Meade Gateway Enclosure 2 Active 3-Design 

 2,762,175 2,762,175 B-40643A Capital Improvement Program

Admin

North Spring Garden Greenway 5 Active 5-Constructio

 850,000 850,000 B-40666B Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Brickell Lighting Phase II - D2 2 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 590,000 590,000 B-40672G Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Flagami Traffic Calming - D4 (Including 11th

Street Milling and Resurfacing)

4 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 3,113,501 3,113,501 B-40686 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Miami River Greenways/ Streetscape Segment

D (ELH)

3 Active 5-Constructio

 145,785 145,785 B-40695L Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Miami River Greenway Segment G and

Segment E2 Decorative Lighting

3 Active 7-On-Hold 

 1,752,327 1,752,327 B-40704A Capital Improvement Program

Admin

SW 32 Avenue Improvements Additional

Services

2,4 Active 3-Design 

 5,017,214 5,017,214 B-43114A Public Works Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Phase 29 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

 50,000 50,000 B-71210 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Downtown Street Conversions 2,5 Active 1-Study 

 3,955,018 3,955,018 B-78508B Capital Improvement Program

Admin

ARRA - NE 2nd Avenue Improvements (57th

Street to 69th Street) Segment C

5 Active 5-Constructio

 2,220,578 2,220,578 B-78508C Capital Improvement Program

Admin

ARRA - NE 2 Avenue Improvements Segment

B2

5 Active 5-Constructio

 1,207,178 1,147,178 B-30035A Capital Improvement Program

Admin

North Shorecrest Roads Improvements Project

- Partial CDBG 91-02910 - D2

2 Active 5-Constructio

65
City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Dist. Estimate ($) Phase

CIP Projects Only

 Cost Estimates versus Available Funding

Active & Future

B-No. Client Project

Total Cost Total 

Funds ($) Status 

341-Streets & Sidewalks

 1,138,397 1,138,099 B-30035B Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Shorecrest Roadway Milling & Resurfacing

Project

2 Active 5-Constructio

 1,212,500 182,100 B-30167B Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Shenandoah Traffic Calming - Phase 2 - D4 4 Active 3-Design 

 1,603,890 1,550,000 B-30167D Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Shenandoah Roadway Improvements 4 Active 5-Const. (JOC

 11,248,770 450,000 B-30179 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Downtown Baywalk Master Plan & Design 2 Active 1-Study 

 2,617,649 439,001 B-30518 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Northwest 14th Street Streetscape Project - CIP

Funded

5 Active 4-Bid 

 2,702,729 673,568 B-30621 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Center Grove Street and Lighting

Improvements

2 Active 3-Design 

 2,998,700 2,661,864 B-30624 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Overtown Greenway @ NW 11 Terrace -

Partially Funded by CRA 92-689001

5 Active 3-Design 

 1,221,625 1,000,000 B-30631 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Miami River Greenway from Miami Circle

Greenway to South Miami Avenue

2 Active 3-Design 

 9,260,130 550,000 B-30646 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

South Bayshore Drive Roadway and Drainage

Improvements

2 Active 3-Design 

 716,694 711,257 B-30716 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Tigertail Resurfacing - D2 2 Active 5-Constructio

 5,664,273 3,700,001 B-30724 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NW 33rd Street Roadway Improvement

Project - D1

1 Active 3-Design 

 3,061,314 308,172 B-30774 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

West Flagler Area Improvements - D4 4 Active 3-Design 

 1,052,354 355,276 B-30780 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NW 14 Avenue and 28 Street Area Roadway

Improvements - D1

1 Active 2-Pre-Design 

 488,405 300,001 B-30880 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NE 2nd Court Roadway and Drainage

Improvements Project - D5

5 Active 3-Design 

 2,705,098 641,494 B-31206 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

SE 3rd Street Widening 2 Active 7-On-Hold 

 800,000 123,618 B-40665 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Brentwood Village Project 5 Future 8-Future 

 2,414,686 1,198,012 B-40672D Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Flagami Traffic Calming Phase IV - D4 4 Active 3-Design 

66
City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Dist. Estimate ($) Phase

CIP Projects Only

 Cost Estimates versus Available Funding

Active & Future

B-No. Client Project

Total Cost Total 

Funds ($) Status 

341-Streets & Sidewalks

 36,938,862 4,985,831 B-78508 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NE 2 Avenue Improvements 2,5 Active 3-Design 

 1,062,500 0 B-30520 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Hainsworth Village Street Improvement 2 Future 8-Future 

 0 0 B-30612 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

District 2 - Miscellaneous Roadway

Improvements

2 Future 8-Future 

 1,140,000 0 B-30723 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NW 24th Avenue Roadway Improvement

Project - D1

1 Active 3-Design 

 660,816 0 B-31212 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NE 1st Avenue Reconstruction - NE 41 St. to

NE 43 St.

5 Future 8-Future 

 441,636 0 B-31213 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

N. Miami Court Reconstruction 5 Future 8-Future 

 666,995 0 B-31214 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NE 1 Court Reconstruction 5 Future 8-Future 

 500,000 0 B-31215 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NE Miami Place Reconstruction 5 Future 8-Future 

 868,100 0 B-31217 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NE 43 Street Reconstruction 5 Future 8-Future 

 287,000 0 B-40176 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

West Flagler Street Landscape - D4 4 Future 8-Future 

 2,652,720 0 B-40672E Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Flagami Traffic Calming, Phase V - D4 4 Future 8-Future 

 3,233,408 0 B-40672F Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Flagami Traffic Calming, Phase VI - D4 4 Future 8-Future 

 0 0 B-40700 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Little River Road Improvements Project -

Phase I

5 Future 8-Future 

341-Streets & Sidewalks 205,478,973 127,028,015 

343-Mass Transit

 796,479 796,479 B-30645A Transportation & Transit Transportation Program Support Services -

Transit Professional Services

1,2,3,4,5 Active 3-Design 

 4,084,282 4,084,282 B-30668 Transportation & Transit ARRA - Purchase of Trolley Vehicles 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

 150,085 150,085 B-40268 Transportation & Transit FEC Quiet Zone Study 2,5 Active 1-Study 

 2,891,122 2,891,122 B-70715 Transportation & Transit City of Miami Trolley Program - Capital

Acquisition

1,2,3,4,5 Active 3-Design 

67
City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Dist. Estimate ($) Phase

CIP Projects Only

 Cost Estimates versus Available Funding

Active & Future

B-No. Client Project

Total Cost Total 

Funds ($) Status 

343-Mass Transit 7,921,968 7,921,968 

351-Sanitary Sewers

 60,000 60,000 B-70600 Police Police Department Sanitary Sewer System

Repairs

1,2,3,4,5 Active 3-Design 

351-Sanitary Sewers 60,000 60,000 

352-Storm Sewers

 9,230,466 9,230,466 B-30014 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Northwest Road and Storm Sewers

Improvements - D5

5 Active 5-Constructio

 4,401,561 4,401,561 B-30262 Public Works Citywide Storm Sewer Repair Project 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

 4,488,983 4,488,983 B-30588 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

San Marco Island and Biscayne Island

Drainage Improvements - D2

2 Active 5-Constructio

 9,853 9,853 B-30597 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Citywide Drainage Improvement Project 1,2,3,4,5 Active 1-Study 

 3,445,330 3,445,330 B-30629 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Durham Terrace Drainage Project 4 Active 5-Constructio

 1,004,934 1,004,934 B-30700 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

FDEP Drainage Wells Compliance 1,2,3,4,5 Active 3-Design 

 600,000 600,000 B-30776 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Silver Bluff Drainage Improvements - D4 4 Future 8-Future 

 500,000 500,000 B-30992 Public Works Riverview Pump Station 3 Active 3-Design 

 851,797 851,797 B-50654 Public Works Overtown Stormwater Pump Station Upgrades 5 Active 7-On-Hold 

 2,890,100 2,890,100 B-50705 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Kinloch Storm Sewer Improvements Project 1,4 Active 5-Constructio

 9,518,900 8,785,811 B-30011 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Englewood Road and Storm Sewer

Improvements - Phase III - D4

4 Active 4-Bid 

 1,398,000 399,920 B-30183 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Garden Storm Sewer - Phase I 1 Active 3-Design 

 716,819 715,384 B-30632 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Drainage Master Plan Update 1,2,3,4,5 Active 1-Study 

 3,278,827 3,100,001 B-30637 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Mary Brickell Village Drainage Improvements 1,2,3,4,5 Active 3-Design 

 23,087,275 3,673,503 B-50643 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Wagner Creek / Seybold Canal Dredging 1,5 Active 7-On-Hold 

 1,483,601 1,208,246 B-50706A Capital Improvement Program Roadway, Drainage and Traffic Improvements 1,4 Active 4-Bid (JOC) 

68
City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program

Dist. Estimate ($) Phase

CIP Projects Only

 Cost Estimates versus Available Funding

Active & Future

B-No. Client Project

Total Cost Total 

Funds ($) Status 

352-Storm Sewers

Admin - D1 & D4

 7,049,000 0 B-30007 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Auburn Storm Sewer Phase III 4 Future 8-Future 

 5,320,000 0 B-30012 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Auburn Storm Sewer Ph. I & II 4 Future 8-Future 

 5,719,000 0 B-30013 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Reid Acres Storm Sewers 5 Future 8-Future 

 3,990,000 0 B-30015 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Little River Storm Sewers Ph. II 5 Future 8-Future 

 5,586,000 0 B-30016 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Liberty Storm Sewers 5 Future 8-Future 

 5,586,000 0 B-30017 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Fairway Storm Sewers 5 Future 8-Future 

 9,975,000 0 B-30018 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

NW 71 St. Main Trunk Storm Sewer 5 Future 8-Future 

 4,500,000 0 B-30216 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Avalon Storm Sewer - Phase III 2,4 Future 8-Future 

 204,444 0 B-30637A Capital Improvement Program

Admin

South Miami Avenue Drainage Improvements

- MDC

2 Future 8-Future 

 9,600,000 0 B-30647 Capital Improvement Program

Admin

Tamiami Roadway & Storm Sewer Project 1,4 Future 8-Future 

352-Storm Sewers 124,435,893 45,305,891 

353-Sol d Waste i

 4,950,820 3,532,282 B-73202C Solid Waste Solid Waste Collection Equipment 1,2,3,4,5 Active 5-Constructio

353-Solid Waste 4,950,820 3,532,282 

Grand Total 715,201,892 410,951,864 

69
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

 

APPENDIX 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alphabetical Project Index 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project name Project 

Number

 Fund Allocation Project 

Status

Project Phase

1814 Brickell Avenue Park 

PlaygroundEquipment

B-30685A $ 42,048 Active 4-Bid

300 NW 11 Street Community Center - CRA 

92-689001

B-40169 $ 1,500,000 Active 3-Design

African Square Park - Splash Park - D5 B-30882 $ 600,000 Active 2-Pre-Design

African Square Park Rec. Bldg. 

Improvements

B-35872 $ - Future 8-Future

Allapattah Community Elderly Center B-35003 $ - Future 8-Future

ARRA - NE 2 Avenue Improvements 

Segment B2

B-78508C $ 2,220,578 Active 5-Construction

ARRA - NE 2nd Avenue Improvements 

(57th Street to 69th Street) Segment C

B-78508B $ 3,955,018 Active 5-Construction

ARRA - Purchase of Trolley Vehicles B-30668 $ 4,084,282 Active 5-Construction

ARRA Citywide Bicycle Rack & Signage 

Program

B-30694 $ 392,130 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

Auburn Storm Sewer Ph. I & II B-30012 $ - Future 8-Future

Auburn Storm Sewer Phase III B-30007 $ - Future 8-Future

Avalon Storm Sewer - Phase III B-30216 $ - Future 8-Future

Bay of Pigs Park Lighting - D4 B-30772 $ 53,000 Active 2-Pre-Design

Bayfront Park Electrical Repairs B-40173 $ 309,000 Active 3-Design

Bayside Historic Sign - D2 B-39910K $ 25,000 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

Baywalk Mobility Plan B-30645D $ 60,000 Active 1-Study

ALPHABELITAL PROJECT INDEX

70
 2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project name Project 

Number

 Fund Allocation Project 

Status

Project Phase

Beacom Project Area Improvements B-30699 $ 721,100 Active 7-On-Hold

Beckham Hall Fire Damage Repair B-30365J $ 6,770 Future 8-Future

Belle Meade Gateway Enclosure B-40183 $ 85,997 Active 3-Design

Bird Avenue Road Improvement B-30628 $ 1,960,508 Active 3-Design

Biscayne Park Site Improvements B-75823 $ 150,000 Future 8-Future

Blanche Park Master Plan Improvements B-75830A $ 250,000 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

Bob Hope Dr. Between NW 20th Street to 

NW 17th Street - D1

B-30703 $ 190,000 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

Brentwood Village Project B-40665 $ 123,618 Future 8-Future

Brickell Area Shared Use Path and Roadway 

Improvements

B-30822 $ 600,000 Future 8-Future

Brickell Avenue Decorative Pedestrian 

Crosswalk

B-39910I $ 32,440 Active 2-Pre-Design

Brickell Lighting Phase II - D2 B-40666B $ 850,000 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

Bryan Park New Tennis/Community Center B-30134A $ 852,128 Active 3-Design

Caribbean Marketplace Renovation B-30671 $ 954,614 Active 4-Bid

Center Grove Street and Lighting 

Improvements

B-30621 $ 673,568 Active 3-Design

City of Miami Impact Fee Study - Citywide B-30994 $ 65,490 Future 8-Future

City of Miami Trolley Program - Capital 

Acquisition

B-70715 $ 2,891,123 Active 3-Design

City Property Building Maintenance B-30365C $ - Future 8-Future

71
 2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project name Project 

Number

 Fund Allocation Project 

Status

Project Phase

Citywide Bicycle Rack & Signage Program B-30694A $ 115,000 Future 8-Future

Citywide Drainage Improvement Project B-30597 $ 9,854 Active 1-Study

Citywide General Fleet Replacement B-74200 $ 3,260,269 Active 5-Construction

Citywide Park Equipment & Site 

Improvements

B-30541 $ 5,293,595 Active 5-Construction

Citywide Park Equipments & Site 

Improvements FY12

B-30541D $ 397,101 Active 3-Design

Citywide Roadway Improvements B-30991 $ 2,416,500 Future 8-Future

Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Phase 29 B-43114A $ 5,017,215 Active 5-Construction

Citywide Storm Sewer Repair Project B-30262 $ 4,401,561 Active 5-Construction

Civic Center NW 14th Street B-30500 $ 2,500,000 Active 3-Design

Coconut Grove Business Improvement 

District - Street Improvements

B-30687 $ 3,099,638 Active 4-Bid (JOC)

Coconut Grove Viewing Platform Spoil 

Island C - D2

B-40171 $ 9,900 Future 8-Future

Coconut Grove Viewing Platform Spoil 

Island E - D2

B-40172 $ 9,900 Future 8-Future

Coconut Grove Waterfront Master Plan 

Implementation - Phase I

B-30182A $ 1,905,544 Active 3-Design

Communication UPS Power B-30384C $ 1,005,800 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) B-72801 $ 120,866 Active 3-Design

Computer Equipment and Software 

Upgrades

B-72805 $ 93,461 Active 5-Construction

Coral Gate Community Improvements - D4 B-30717 $ 200,000 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

72
 2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project name Project 

Number

 Fund Allocation Project 

Status

Project Phase

Coral Gate Park Community Building B-35865A $ 1,943,634 Active 5-Construction

Coral Gate Park Furniture, Security System 

and Miscellaneous Improvements - D4

B-30821 $ 122,000 Active 5-Construction

Coral Way NET Office Remodeling - CD 91-

02994

B-30365E $ 1,015,000 Active 3-Design

Curtis Park New Pool Facility B-35806 $ 2,127,160 Active 1-Study

Damaged Vehicle Replacement / Repairs B-30666 $ 447,124 Active 5-Construction

Defense and Security Equipment 

Acquisition

B-72813 $ 3,767,249 Active 5-Construction

Design District/FEC B-30178 $ 100,000 Future 8-Future

Development/UDP Consultants - Watson 

Is, others

B-70500 $ 451,566 Active 7-On-Hold

Dinner Key Marina - Miscellaneous Repair B-30596 $ 401,356 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

District 1 - Miscellaneous Roadway 

Improvements

B-30611 $ 111,419 Future 8-Future

District 1 - Sidewalk Repairs and ADA B-30377A $ 250,692 Active 5-Construction

District 2 - Miscellaneous Roadway 

Improvements

B-30612 $ - Future 8-Future

District 2 - Sidewalk Repairs & ADA B-30377B $ 250,691 Active 5-Construction

District 2 Quality of Life Park 

Improvements

B-39910E $ 987,988 Active 5-Construction

District 3 - Miscellaneous Roadway 

Improvements

B-30613 $ 10,158,973 Future 8-Future

District 3 - Sidewalk Repairs and ADA B-30377C $ 250,691 Active 7-On-Hold

District 4 - Miscellaneous Roadway 

Improvements

B-30614 $ 36,381 Future 8-Future

73
 2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project name Project 

Number

 Fund Allocation Project 

Status

Project Phase

District 4 - Sidewalk Repairs & ADA B-30377D $ 250,691 Active 5-Construction

District 5 - Miscellaneous Roadway 

Improvements

B-30615 $ 1,809,195 Future 8-Future

District 5 - Sidewalk Repairs & ADA B-30377E $ 250,691 Active 5-Construction

Dorsey Memorial Library Restoration B-30531 $ 250,000 Active 7-On-Hold

Downtown Baywalk Master Plan & Design B-30179 $ 450,000 Active 1-Study

Downtown DRI Transportation Component B-31220 $ 1,417,532 Active 1-Study

Downtown Street Conversions B-71210 $ 50,000 Active 1-Study

Drainage Master Plan Update B-30632 $ 715,384 Active 1-Study

Duarte Park Building Renovation, Splash 

Park and Sign

B-35812A $ 1,312,797 Active 5-Construction

Durham Terrace Drainage Project B-30629 $ 3,445,330 Active 5-Construction

DWNTWN Beautification - Design Phase B-30606D $ 498,780 Active 3-Design

DWNTWN Beautification - North B-30606N $ 7,817,426 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

DWNTWN Beautification - South B-30606S $ 5,090,853 Active 5-Construction

DWNTWN Beautification (Lighting) B-30606L $ 4,475,915 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

DWNTWN Beautification Project Phase I B-30606 $ 3,150,565 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

Emergency Dispatch Furniture B-74204 $ 11,876 Active 5-Construction

Emergency Radio Equipment replacement B-70416 $ 25,000 Future 8-Future

74
 2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project name Project 

Number

 Fund Allocation Project 

Status

Project Phase

Englewood Road and Storm Sewer 

Improvements - Phase III - D4

B-30011 $ 8,785,811 Active 4-Bid

ERP Integration System B-74609 $ 25,474,458 Active 5-Construction

Fair Isle Area Roadway and Drainage 

Improvements - D2

B-30823 $ 180,000 Active 4-Bid (JOC)

Fairway Storm Sewers B-30017 $ - Future 8-Future

FDEP Drainage Wells Compliance B-30700 $ 1,004,934 Active 3-Design

FEC Quiet Zone Study B-40268 $ 150,085 Active 1-Study

FEMA Assistance to Firefighters Program 

FY2011

B-70418 $ 68,722 Future 8-Future

Fern Isle / PBA Park Improvements Project - 

D1

B-30800 $ 116,782 Future 8-Future

Fire Department Training Burn Tower / 

Search Facility & Props

B-70103 $ - Active 7-On-Hold

Fire Rescue Personal Protective Equipment B-70411 $ 820,580 Active 3-Design

Fire Station #10 (New) B-60351 $ 898,123 Future 8-Future

Fire Station #13 B-60453A $ 5,084,496 Active 5-Construction

Fire Station #14 (New) B-60454 $ 5,076,844 Future 2-Pre-Design

Fire Station Equipment and Furniture 

Replacement

B-72803 $ 540,838 Active 5-Construction

Fire Station Hardening / Facility Apparatus 

Room Doors

B-30709 $ - Future 8-Future

Fire Station No. 10 Restroom Remodeling B-70104 $ 179,403 Active 3-Design

Fire Station No. 6 Office Building - 

Structural Analysis

B-70102A $ 74,619 Active 7-On-Hold

75
 2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project name Project 

Number

 Fund Allocation Project 

Status

Project Phase

Fire Stations & Other Fire Facilities B-72802 $ 4,022,960 Active 5-Construction

Firefighting Equipment and Gear B-70106 $ 158,124 Future 8-Future

Flagami Traffic Calming - D4 (Including 11th 

Street Milling and Resurfacing)

B-40672G $ 590,000 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

Flagami Traffic Calming Phase IV - D4 B-40672D $ 1,198,012 Active 3-Design

Flagami Traffic Calming, Phase V - D4 B-40672E $ - Future 8-Future

Flagami Traffic Calming, Phase VI - D4 B-40672F $ - Future 8-Future

Freedom Garden Statue Rehabilitation - D5 B-30885 $ 75,000 Active 5-Construction

Garden Storm Sewer - Phase I B-30183 $ 399,920 Active 3-Design

Generator for City Hall B-30365H $ 25,001 Active 4-Bid (JOC)

Gibson Park Area Street Improvements - 

Street Component of B-30305B

B-30305C $ 1,000,000 Active 5-Construction

Gibson Park Furniture - D5 B-30305D $ 22,020 Active 5-Construction

Gibson Park New Construction (Partially 

Funded by CRA 92-689001)

B-30305B $ 9,939,521 Active 5-Construction

GSA Fleet Maintenance Garage Expansion B-74205B $ 48,535 Active 5-Construction

Gusman Hall Improvements - FY2012 B-30546A $ 105,000 Future 8-Future

Gusman Hall Improvements / Repairs B-70100 $ 423,405 Future 8-Future

Hadley Park New Youth Center B-35883A $ 5,876,805 Active 3-Design

Hainsworth Village Street Improvement B-30520 $ - Future 8-Future

76
 2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project name Project 

Number

 Fund Allocation Project 

Status

Project Phase

Health District Bicycle and Pedestrian 

Mobility Study

B-30645C $ 60,000 Active 1-Study

Homeland Defense Legal Services Support B-30078 $ 29,346 Future 8-Future

I-95 South Miami Terminal Street 

Improvements - D2

B-30718 $ 859,000 Active 3-Design

Irrigation System at Kennedy Dog Park - D2 B-40170 $ 55,945 Active 2-Pre-Design

IT Modernization B-74617 $ 2,800,000 Active 5-Construction

James L. Knight Center / Hyatt- Fire Alarm 

System Replacement

B-70414 $ 484,979 Future 8-Future

James L. Knight Center Chiller & Cooling 

Tower Oracle Project 41-410004

B-40181 $ 4,521,400 Active 5-Construction

Kennedy Park Floating Dock PHI B-30541B $ 130,001 Active 4-Bid

Kennedy Park Restroom Building 

Improvements

B-35838 $ 222,033 Active 3-Design

Kennedy Park Shoreline Stabilization Phase 

I

B-30541C $ 186,001 Active 3-Design

Kinloch Park - Senior Community Center B-35858 $ - Active 7-On-Hold

Kinloch Storm Sewer Improvements Project B-50705 $ 2,890,100 Active 5-Construction

Land Management System B-74614 $ 6,316,151 Active 3-Design

Large Firefighting Equipment B-72809 $ 326,816 Active 5-Construction

Legion Park Boat Ramp Repairs - D2 B-30820 $ 14,124 Future 8-Future

Liberty Storm Sewers B-30016 $ - Future 8-Future

Light Fleet Replacement B-72808 $ 667,658 Active 5-Construction

77
 2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project name Project 

Number

 Fund Allocation Project 

Status

Project Phase

Linear Parks, Greenways and Baywalk 

Improvements

B-30504 $ 961,000 Future 8-Future

Little River Road Improvements Project - 

Phase I

B-40700 $ - Future 8-Future

Little River Storm Sewers Ph. II B-30015 $ - Future 8-Future

Little River Waterfront Park B-50722 $ 600,000 Future 8-Future

Lummus Landing Square - D5 B-30886 $ 925,061 Active 3-Design

Lummus Park Historic Building Restoration B-35844 $ - Future 8-Future

Lummus Park Landing Project - Street 

Project

B-30643 $ 1,368,535 Active 3-Design

Manatee Bend Park Shoreline 

Improvements - D2

B-30801 $ 50,027 Future 8-Future

Manuel Artime ADA Improvements B-30194A $ 363,831 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

Marine Stadium Bulkhead Replacement B-30689 $ 1,106,603 Active 3-Design

Marine Stadium Marina at Virginia Key B-40180 $ 1,740,007 Active 2-Pre-Design

Marine Stadium Marina Improvements B-33514 $ 385,645 Active 3-Design

Marine Stadium Restoration B-30688 $ 350,000 Active 7-On-Hold

Martin Luther King (MLK) Blvd / I-95 Area 

Improvements - D5

B-30773 $ 100,000 Active 3-Design

Mary Brickell Village Drainage 

Improvements

B-30637 $ 3,100,001 Active 3-Design

Melreese Golf Training Center B-30566A $ 2,385,560 Active 5-Construction

Miamarina Emergency Pier Repairs B-30325 $ 1,311,254 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

78
 2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project name Project 

Number

 Fund Allocation Project 

Status

Project Phase

Miamarina Intracoastal Bulkhead 

Assessment

B-30604 $ 90,000 Active 1-Study

Miamarina Pier A, B & C Fire Line Repairs B-30696 $ 250,000 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

Miami River Greenway (5th Street bridge 

exten.)

B-30336 $ 2,256,640 Active 4-Bid

Miami River Greenway from Miami Circle 

Greenway to South Miami Avenue

B-30631 $ 1,000,000 Active 3-Design

Miami River Greenway from NW 10th to 

NW 12th Ave.

B-30651 $ 3,160,379 Active 3-Design

Miami River Greenway Segment G and 

Segment E2 Decorative Lighting

B-40695L $ 145,785 Active 7-On-Hold

Miami River Greenway SW 1st Court to 

South Miami Avenue - D2

B-30130 $ 1,557,530 Active 5-Construction

Miami River Greenways/ Streetscape 

Segment D (ELH)

B-40686 $ 3,113,501 Active 5-Construction

Miami Women's Club Baywalk Project - 

CRA 92-686001

B-30731 $ 93,000 Active 3-Design

Miscellaneous Repairs 10% Set Aside B-30706 $ 1,853,460 Future 8-Future

Moore Park New Construction B-35887 $ 7,605,466 Active 3-Design

Morningside Park New Pool Facility B-30585 $ 200,000 Future 8-Future

MRC Emergency Repairs B-30996 $ 17,065 Future 8-Future

MRC Security System Harding - UASI 

Funded 18-180011

B-70415 $ - Active 3-Design

Museum of Science - Development in 

Bicentennial Park - Phase 2

B-78502A $ 2,000,000 Active 3-Design

Museum Park - Partially Funded by CRA 92-

686001

B-30538 $ 11,756,367 Active 3-Design

Museum Park Environmental Remediation - 

92-686001

B-30538B $ 200,000 Active 3-Design

79
 2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project name Project 

Number

 Fund Allocation Project 

Status

Project Phase

N. Miami Court Reconstruction B-31213 $ - Future 8-Future

NE 1 Court Reconstruction B-31214 $ - Future 8-Future

NE 1st Avenue Reconstruction - NE 41 St. 

to NE 43 St.

B-31212 $ - Future 8-Future

NE 2 Avenue Improvements B-78508 $ 4,985,831 Active 3-Design

NE 2nd Court Roadway and Drainage 

Improvements Project - D5

B-30880 $ 300,001 Active 3-Design

NE 43 Street Reconstruction B-31217 $ - Future 8-Future

NE Miami Place Reconstruction B-31215 $ - Future 8-Future

Neighborhood Parks Improv. Contingencies 

- ADA Modifications

B-35904 $ 771,223 Future 8-Future

Neighborhood Traffic Calming 

Improvements-D4-Study

B-30693 $ 35,892 Active 1-Study

New Dinner Key Marina Dockmaster 

Building

B-60464 $ 3,446,441 Active 3-Design

North 14 St. Multi Media Entertainment 

District Streetscape 92-686001

B-30394 $ 6,000,000 Active 5-Construction

North Shorecrest Roads Improvements 

Project - Partial CDBG 91-02910 - D2

B-30035A $ 1,147,178 Active 5-Construction

North Spring Garden Greenway B-40643A $ 2,762,175 Active 5-Construction

North Venetian Drive Lighting (District 2 

QOL)

B-39910C $ 100,000 Active 3-Design

Northwest 14th Street Streetscape Project - 

CIP Funded

B-30518 $ 439,001 Active 4-Bid

Northwest Road and Storm Sewers 

Improvements - D5

B-30014 $ 9,230,466 Active 5-Construction

NW 11 Street from 27 to 37 Avenue Area 

Roadway Improvements - D1

B-30781 $ 739,493 Future 8-Future

80
 2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project name Project 

Number

 Fund Allocation Project 

Status

Project Phase

NW 11th Street Roadway Improvement 

Project - D1

B-30725 $ 750,000 Active 5-Construction

NW 12 Avenue / NW 12 Place Roadway 

Improvements

B-30883 $ 999,976 Active 3-Design

NW 14 Avenue and 28 Street Area 

Roadway Improvements - D1

B-30780 $ 355,276 Active 2-Pre-Design

NW 14th Avenue Between NW 24th Street 

to NW 27th Street - D1

B-30704 $ 240,000 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

NW 14th Court Roadway & Drainage 

Improvements - D3

B-30746 $ 180,000 Active 4-Bid (JOC)

NW 17th Court Roadway Improvement 

Project - D1

B-30728 $ 110,000 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

NW 17th Terrace Roadway Improvement 

Project - D1

B-30729 $ 250,000 Active 3-Design

NW 18th Avenue Roadway Improvement 

Project - D1

B-30727 $ 1,810,000 Active 3-Design

NW 24th Avenue Roadway Improvement 

Project - D1

B-30723 $ - Active 3-Design

NW 24th Street Between NW 14th Avenue 

and NW 17th Avenue - D1

B-30705 $ 360,000 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

NW 31st Street Roadway Improvement 

Project - D1

B-30722 $ 311,000 Active 3-Design

NW 33rd Street Roadway Improvement 

Project - D1

B-30724 $ 3,700,001 Active 3-Design

NW 4th Terrace Roadway Improvement 

Project - D1

B-30730 $ 75,000 Active 3-Design

NW 60th Avenue Roadway Improvement 

Project - D1

B-30726 $ 888,000 Active 4-Bid

NW 62 Street West of I-95 Roadway 

Improvements - D5

B-30884 $ 75,000 Future 8-Future

NW 71 St. Main Trunk Storm Sewer B-30018 $ - Future 8-Future

NW 8th Street Roadway and Drainage 

Improvements

B-30745 $ 402,000 Active 4-Bid (JOC)

81
 2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project name Project 

Number

 Fund Allocation Project 

Status

Project Phase

NW 9th Street Roadway Improvement 

Project - D1

B-30732 $ 756,248 Active 5-Construction

Oakland Grove Park Playground Equipment B-75973 $ 15,000 Future 8-Future

Old Fire Station No. 2 Restoration - CRA 92-

686001

B-30579 $ 3,500,000 Active 5-Construction

Overtown Greenway @ NW 11 Terrace - 

Partially Funded by CRA 92-689001

B-30624 $ 2,661,864 Active 3-Design

Overtown Stormwater Pump Station 

Upgrades

B-50654 $ 851,797 Active 7-On-Hold

Pallot Park Shoreline Improvements - D2 B-30802 $ 50,000 Future 8-Future

Palm Grove Road Improvements B-30630 $ 3,851,337 Active 5-Construction

Parks ADA Modifications - District 2 B-30547E $ 215,348 Active 4-Bid (JOC)

Parks ADA Modifications - District 3 - Jose 

Marti Park

B-30547F $ 96,917 Active 4-Bid (JOC)

Parks ADA Modifications - District 4 - 

Shenadoah Park

B-30547G $ 491,147 Active 3-Design

Parks ADA Modifications - District 5 B-30547H $ 211,137 Active 4-Bid (JOC)

Peacock Park Site Improvements B-75883 $ 830,124 Active 3-Design

Phone and Radio Equipment Upgrades B-72804 $ 351,200 Active 5-Construction

Police Department Sanitary Sewer System 

Repairs

B-70600 $ 60,000 Active 3-Design

Police Headquarters Helipad and Roof 

Replacement

B-72915 $ 240,321 Active 4-Bid (JOC)

Police Headquarters Helipad and Roof 

Replacement

B-72915A $ 400,000 Future 8-Future

Police Radios Replacement B-30554 $ 843,083 Active 3-Design

82
 2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project name Project 

Number

 Fund Allocation Project 

Status

Project Phase

Police Swat Vehicles B-30997 $ 322,846 Future 8-Future

Police Vehicle Replacement B-74220 $ 24,239,738 Active 5-Construction

Property Maintenance Building 

Improvements

B-74219 $ - Future 8-Future

Public Works Maintenance Yard B-30551 $ 3,268,254 Active 3-Design

Quality of Life District 2 - Various Projects B-39910 $ 259,331 Future 8-Future

Refurbishing of Existing Apparatus B-70105 $ 230,000 Future 8-Future

Reid Acres Storm Sewers B-30013 $ - Future 8-Future

Replace Existing Fire Engines B-72811 $ - Future 8-Future

Riverview Pump Station B-30992 $ 500,000 Active 3-Design

Roadway Improvements B-30990 $ 1,361,000 Future 8-Future

Roadway, Drainage and Traffic 

Improvements - D1 & D4

B-50706A $ 1,208,246 Active 4-Bid (JOC)

Robert King High Park Furniture - D4 B-35868A $ 45,000 Active 5-Construction

Royal Road - Milling and Resurfacing - D2 B-40174 $ 60,000 Active 5-Construction

San Marco Island and Biscayne Island 

Drainage Improvements - D2

B-30588 $ 4,488,984 Active 5-Construction

SE 3rd Street Widening B-31206 $ 641,495 Active 7-On-Hold

Seminole Dinghy Dock Expansion B-30602 $ 30,000 Future 8-Future

Shenandoah Area Improvements - D4 B-30775 $ 414,389 Active 3-Design

83
 2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project name Project 

Number

 Fund Allocation Project 

Status

Project Phase

Shenandoah Roadway Improvements B-30167D $ 1,550,000 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

Shenandoah Traffic Calming - Phase 2 - D4 B-30167B $ 182,100 Active 3-Design

Shorecrest Roadway Milling & Resurfacing 

Project

B-30035B $ 1,138,100 Active 5-Construction

Silver Bluff Drainage Improvements - D4 B-30776 $ 600,000 Future 8-Future

Silver Bluff Traffic Calming Priority 3 - D4 B-30168A $ 620,841 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

Solid Waste Collection Equipment B-73202C $ 4,950,820 Active 5-Construction

South Bayshore Drive from Aviation 

Avenue to Kirk Avenue - D2 PW

B-40168 $ 100,000 Active 2-Pre-Design

South Bayshore Drive Roadway and 

Drainage Improvements

B-30646 $ 550,000 Active 3-Design

South Miami Avenue Drainage 

Improvements - MDC

B-30637A $ - Future 8-Future

Spoil Island E Restoration and Floating Dock B-30721 $ 90,000 Active 3-Design

SW 13th Street Roadway & Drainage 

Improvements - D3

B-30747 $ 400,000 Active 3-Design

SW 16 Avenue Roadway & Drainage 

Improvements - D3

B-30741 $ 198,000 Active 3-Design

SW 16th Avenue from Coral Way to 20 

Street - D3

B-30719 $ 135,000 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

SW 17th Avenue Roadway & Drainage 

Improvements - D3 & D4

B-30760 $ 600,000 Future 8-Future

SW 22nd Avenue Medians - US 1 to Coral 

Way - D4

B-30770 $ 400,000 Active 1-Study

SW 28th Road Roadway & Drainage 

Improvements - D3

B-30743 $ 250,000 Active 3-Design

SW 32 Avenue Improvements Additional 

Services

B-40704A $ 1,752,327 Active 3-Design

84
 2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project name Project 

Number

 Fund Allocation Project 

Status

Project Phase

SW/NW 17th Avenue Traffic Corridor Study 

- Citywide

B-30993 $ 200,000 Active 1-Study

Tamiami Roadway & Storm Sewer Project B-30647 $ - Future 8-Future

Technology Infrastructure B-74610 $ 9,116,151 Active 5-Construction

Tigertail Resurfacing - D2 B-30716 $ 711,258 Active 5-Construction

Traffic Calming SW 6th Street Project - D4 B-30771 $ 324,670 Active 3-Design

Traffic Study Reviews - Oracle Project 35-

110007

B-30346 $ 411,622 Active 1-Study

Transportation Program Support Services - 

Transit Professional Services

B-30645A $ 796,479 Active 3-Design

Transportation Program Support Services - 

Transportation Professional Services

B-30645B $ 1,026,000 Active 3-Design

Triangle Park Swings - D3 B-30711 $ 8,500 Active 7-On-Hold

Upgrade PC Software & Hardware B-74606 $ 2,920,683 Active 5-Construction

US-1 Median Closures at Bridgeport and 

SW 30 Ct - D2

B-30662D $ 330,000 Active 7-On-Hold

US1 Roadway Improvements and Wall 

Replacement Phase II

B-30542A $ 2,671,423 Active 5-Const. (JOC)

Venetian Causeway Improvements B-39911 $ 3,196,465 Active 4-Bid

Virginia Key Beach Park Historic 

Restoration Phase 2

B-30174 $ 1,306,765 Active 5-Construction

Virginia Key Beach Park Museum B-30508 $ 20,527,127 Active 2-Pre-Design

Virginia Key Beach Swimming Area B-30587 $ - Future 8-Future

Virginia Key Bike Trail Building - D2 B-30995 $ 377,000 Active 2-Pre-Design

85
 2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project name Project 

Number

 Fund Allocation Project 

Status

Project Phase

Virginia Key Landfill Assessment B-35002 $ 1,400,000 Active 5-Construction

Virginia Key Rowing Center Improvements B-30374 $ 616,513 Active 2-Pre-Design

Virrick Park New Pool Facility B-35853A $ 2,088,897 Active 7-On-Hold

Wagner Creek / Seybold Canal Dredging B-50643 $ 3,673,503 Active 7-On-Hold

Waterfront Improvements Citywide B-39903 $ - Future 8-Future

Watson Island Aviation & Visitor Center B-75005 $ 4,795,331 Active 5-Construction

Watson Island Infrastructure B-75001 $ 150,000 Future 8-Future

Watson Island Public Park Improvements B-35000 $ - Future 8-Future

West End Park New Community Building B-30690 $ 435,471 Active 3-Design

West Flagler Area Improvements - D4 B-30774 $ 308,173 Active 3-Design

West Flagler Street Landscape - D4 B-40176 $ - Future 8-Future

86
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

List of Completed Projects 

in FY2010-2011 

 

 

 

 

 
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project Project 

Number

Project Description Fund 

Allocation 

($)

NW 2nd Avenue 

Roadway 

Improvements - CRA 

92-689001

B-30135 This project includes the design, and construction of 

the needed improvements including but not limited to 

roadway reconstruction, pavement milling and 

resufacing, repair of broken driveway approches and 

sidewalk, new ADA compliant pedestrian ramps, and 

repair of curb and gutter as needed. NW 2nd Avenue is 

under the jurisdiction Miami-Dade County Public 

Works. 


1,800,000

NW 3rd Avenue 

Overtown Business 

Corridor Streetscape 

Project - CRA 92-

689001

B-30390 Reconstruction of the roadway, sidewalk 

reconstruction, decorative lights, landscaping and 

hardscape of the corridor

5,200,000

City Hall Staff Room 

Improvements

B-30365D Renovate the Staff room at City Hall to improve the 

utilization of the space and the HVAC system, install 

some electrical outlets and provide 3 new cubicles by 

eliminating a storage room behind the Staff Room.

16,384

Citywide Telephone 

Equipment Upgrade

B-74616 Replacement of aging voice communications 

equipment




192,432

Compound fence 

modification for Public 

Works Operations Yard

B-30365G Modify existing 6' high fence on east property line to 10' 

high.

9,995

Fleet Truck Wash 

Upgrade

B-74205A Construction of an automated truck wash facility 

included a water reclamation system, new 2000 SF 

building and all related components of the demolition of 

the existing metal structure.





1,447,677

301 - CRA

311 - GENERAL GOVERNMENT

87
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project Project 

Number

Project Description Fund 

Allocation 

($)

MRC - Elevator 

Modernization

B-74214 Replace building's original passenger elevators




1,060,900

SAR for Property 

Maintenance Facility

B-30001 The project involves the preparation & submittal of a 

site assessment report (SAR) to MD-DERM for the city 

maintenance facility.


122,429

Strategic IT and Project 

Management Services

B-74608 Acquisition of Strategic IT and Project Management 

Services.




599,290

Fire Station #11 - 

Trailer Rental / Land 

Lease

B-60452B To cover cost of lease agreement for use of vacant lot 

and the monthly lease payments for trailers.

200,000

Fire Station #11 (New) B-60452 Design and construction of approx. 11,749 s.f. two 

stories and two bay apparatus fire rescue facility. The 

facility includes all typical fire station amenities for fire 

rescue personnel plus two lieutenants and a captain. 

The project includes demolition of an existing fire 

station and site development including parking spaces 

for 15-18 vehicles and landscaping. Also, the project 

includes a water main improvement and new 

signalization. The project included design and 

construction of a temporary site for firefighter relocation 

in two trailers with temporary signalization, electrical, 

water, sewer, fire truck parking area, some landscape, 

chainlink and wood fences for security. The temporary 

site is at close location of the new fire station 

construction, and it shall operate until the conclusion of 

the construction.

4,633,273

Fire Station Alerting 

and Records 

Management

B-72806 Replacing the Fire Stations alerting system with new 

updated system




2,645,144

Fire Station Emergency 

Generator Upgrades

B-30364 Emergency Generator Replacement at Fire Stations 

#2, #5, #7 and Headquarter Complex Building.





364,407

Fire Station 

Enhancements - Range 

Hoods

B-72802N Modification and/or replacement of existing stove hood 

equipment at the following Fire Stations: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 

7, 8, 9, 10 and 12.

45,000

312 - PUBLIC SAFETY

88
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project Project 

Number

Project Description Fund 

Allocation 

($)

New Rescue Trucks - 

Impact Fees North 

District

B-72810N To fund purchase of 2 new rescue trucks with 

enhanced capabilities and technology, to be housed at 

fire station #6 and fire station #5. Rescue Trucks #25 & 

#26.

494,508

New Rescue Trucks - 

Impact Fees South 

District - Fire Station 4

B-72810S To fund the purchase of a new rescue truck with 

enhanced capabilities and technology, to be housed at 

fire station #4.

243,375

South Police 

Substation Hurricane 

Protection

B-30592 The project consists of providing hurricane protection 

for the windows and the circular main front entrance at 

the 2-story police substation. Phase I included the 

preparation of a design analysis report to retrofit the 

building with protective screening and impact resistant 

window/glass system. Phase II will include the 

purchase and Installation of a selected system based 

on the phase I report.

548,521

The College of Policing - 

EOC Facility

B-72910A Upgraded IT Switchgear equipment for the Emergency 

Operations Center

1,231,406

City Hall Roof B-30121B Temporary water proofing repairs to existing roof. 7,201

Dinner Key Dredging B-30247 Engineering and implementation of dredging 

approximately 10,000 cy for the main approach channel 

at the north end of the Marina. 





1,261,370

Dinner Key 

Harbormaster Office 

Trailer

B-33511A 1. Purchase and install an office trailer, 

restroom/shower trailer and an ADA compliant 

restroom/shower trailer.


2. Provide utility hook-up to the trailers.


3. Stripe parking spaces on the existing asphalt 

surface.


4. Provide parking lot illumination


5. Stripe crosswalk on the access road for pedestrian 

crossing to the boat ramp

228,547

James L Knight Center 

Garage Improvements 

(Garage #4)

B-30365B Contribution to MPA to automate the parking operation 

at the Miami Tower to a new on foot system





480,000

James L. Knight Center 

Miscellaneous 

Improvements

B-33506 Various improvements to James L. Knight Center 86,438

325 - PUBLIC FACILITIES

89
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project Project 

Number

Project Description Fund 

Allocation 

($)

Manuel Artime Building 

#970 Re-Roof

B-30672 Replace existing roof with new roof. 175,000

Manuel Artime 

Miscellaneous Project

B-30501A Miscellaneous Improvements 273,664

Marine Stadium Marina 

- Miscellaneous Repair 

& Equipment

B-30595 Miscellaneous Repair & Equipment 281,146

Miamarina - 

Miscellaneous Repairs

B-30594 Miscellaneous Repairs 186,720

Piling and Pier Repairs - 

Dinner Key

B-60474A Piling and Pier Repairs





166,000

Alice Wainwright Park 

Site Improvements

B-35906 Site Improvements including court, irrigation, 

landscaping, playground and furnishing upgrades or 

installation.





283,803

Armbrister Park Site 

Improvements

B-75816 Site Improvements including Court, Irrigation, 

Landscaping, Playground and Furnishing Upgrades or 

Installation.





110,000

Bay of Pigs Park Shade 

Structure

B-75920A Park Shade Structure 29,000

Bayfront Park Baywalk 

Improvements

B-30656 The project scope is limited to the area immediately 

surrounding the existing Baywalk, from Chopin Plaza to 

N.E. 2nd Avenue. The scope includes but is not limited 

to: demolition of portions of existing concrete walks 

including hauling and proper disposal of all debris; 

removal of existing plant material including small trees, 

shrubs and existing ground cover; excavation and 

preparation of new planters with suitable planting 

material and topsoil; new plant material to include, 

large feature trees, large palms, medium trees, ground 

cover; all necessary topsoil and mulch; irrigation 

including reworking existing systems and potentially 

new pumps and controls; site furnishings including park 

benches and litter receptacles.

1,600,000

Belle Meade 

Playground

B-75821 Playground




18,505

331 - PARKS & RECREATION

90
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project Project 

Number

Project Description Fund 

Allocation 

($)

Bicentennial / Museum 

Park Mooring Bollards

B-30538A Design and install ship bollards for Bicentennial Park 

on the north side of FEC slip

1,484,754

Blanche Park Site 

Improvements

B-75830 Site Improvements including: Irrigation, Landscaping, 

Playground and Furnishing Upgrades or Installation.





45,000

Brickell Avenue Park 

Land Acquisition

B-30685 Acquisition of property located at 1814 Brickell Avenue 

for park land purposes

2,553,277

Buena Vista Park Court 

Upgrades

B-75947 Court Upgrades




10,000

Buena Vista Park 

Playground Equipment

B-75945 Playground Equipment




15,000

Buena Vista Park Site 

Furnishings

B-75946 Site Furnishing




5,000

Charles Hadley Park 

Field House and 

Concession Building

B-35883 Project consists of the furnishing of all labor, materials 

and equipment for the design and construction of a one 

story concession building of approximately 3,000 

square feet as well as water main and sewer line 

improvements. The building includes a field house, 

restrooms, park office and ancillary space to support 

the building's operation. Also, the project includes a 

Site Plan Study to identify future site improvements in 

the park. 

1,271,000

Curtis Park Playground 

Equipment and Site 

Furnishing

B-35808A Playground Equipment and Site Furnishings





56,123

91
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project Project 

Number

Project Description Fund 

Allocation 

($)

Duarte Park ADA 

Modification - 

Construction Only

B-35812B At the parking lot, provide accessible parking spaces 

and access aisle. At the Recreational Building: 

Replace the entrance door knob hardware with 

accessible lever operated hardware at the Computer 

room. At women's and men's bathrooms: Provide 

permanent ADA signage, grab bars at handicap stalls, 

paper towel dispensers and at the women's only 

replace the toilet flush control on the open side of the 

toilet's clear space. At the recreation area replace the 

drinking fountain with hi-low accessible drinking 

fountain. At the Pavilion area provide an accessible 

picnic table. 

At the Field house restrooms provide ADA permanent 

signage, accessible stalls, replace all bathroom 

accessories, replace all plumbing fixtures and adjust 

plumbing rough accordingly replace entry door with 

accessible door and hardware. At the Field relocate 

and replace drinking fountain with Hi-Lo accessible 

drinking fountain aand provide an accessible route from 

the Field House to the Basketball and Baseball 

bleachers. 

147,781

Henderson Park New 

Office / Restroom 

Facility

B-35856A Design and construction of a 1,290 SF building with 

restrooms, office with storage, food serving area, and 

storage rooms for lawn equipment and Park furniture. 

The scope also includes the design and construction of 

a 2,560 SF covered recreation area, entry plaza, 

landscaping, security and sports lighting and 

miscellaneous site improvements such as site furniture 

and accessibility from Park to Clinic facility next door.

1,234,069

Jose Marti Park New 

Swings / Shade and 

Additional Vitacourse

B-30640 Install new swings and shade structure and expand vita 

course.

73,897

Kirk Munroe Tennis 

Court Improvements

B-75854 Tennis Court Improvements 







143,057

Legion Park Site 

Furnishings

B-75856 To provide and install light structure at basketball 

court.





60,000

Marjorie Stoneman 

Douglas Park Site 

Improvements

B-75862 Site Improvements including: Court, Irrigation, 

Landscaping, Playground and Furnishing Upgrades or 

Installation.





49,768

92
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project Project 

Number

Project Description Fund 

Allocation 

($)

Merrie Christmas Park 

Site Improvements

B-75864 Site Improvements including: Court, Irrigation, 

Landscaping, Playground and Furnishing Upgrades or 

Installation.





60,000

Moore Park Athletic 

Field OBC

B-30625 To commemorate its 75th anniversary the Orange Bowl 

Committee proposed to build with the City of Miami a 

youth sports/high school football stadium at Moore Par, 

the place where the tradition of the Orange Bowl game 

was born. The new facility includes:


"Football field of synthetic turf 


"Running track with facilities for track & field events


"Electronic score board


"Field sports lighting


"1,500-seat aluminum bleachers


"6,000 sf building with restrooms, clubrooms, 

concession area for home and visitor teams, in addition 

to ticket booth, storage spaces and press box with PA 

system.


2,500,000

Roberto Clemente Park 

Recreation Building

B-30172A The project consists of the furnishing of all labor, 

materials and equipment for a new Recreation Building 

of approximately 9,000 sq. ft. (Gross Area)at Roberto 

Clemente Park. The new building has spaces for 

Neighborhood Enhancement Team (NET) that includes 

two staff offices, one large open office, reception area. 

Also, the new building has the Parks Department 

spaces such as art and craft room/homework , 

computer room for 8 to 12 stations, multipurpose 

rooms, children room and warming kitchen and staff 

office. The shared areas are the conference room for 8 

to 10 people, the staff room and the public rooms for 

approximatly 300 kids during summer programs, 

electrical room, pump room, maintenance storage, 

covered terrace, playground area and water playground 

area.

3,081,158

93
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project Project 

Number

Project Description Fund 

Allocation 

($)

Shenandoah Park 

Improvements

B-30304 PHASE I: Install bollards along SW 22 Ave, improve 

SW 17 Alley, construct a drainage system and replace 

fence and wind screen. PHASE II: New pool heater 

system and modify related piping and electrical 

systems. PHASE III: New irrigation and drainage 

systems, grade and sod the field. PHASE IV: Remodel 

the Recreation Building, install a new HVAC system, 

Install New Insulation and ceiling Drywall, Install new 

Movable Partition, construct a new addition for Arts and 

Craft, and Remodeling of Restroom facility.





2,513,184

Town Park 

Improvements

B-75985A Miscellaneous Improvements
 45,000

Virginia Key Master 

Plan

B-30363 Master Plan





725,000

Virginia Key Wild Life & 

Nature Center

B-30347 Virginia Key Wild Life & Nature Center - General 

Improvements to Park Site





435,996

Williams Park 

Community Building

B-75991A Demolish the existing 2,500 SF community center and 

construct a new approximately 5,000 SF community 

center with three multipurpose rooms, an art and crafts 

room, a computer room, a manager's office, public 

restrooms and various support spaces. Remodel 

portions of the walkways and bleachers to satisfy 

accessibility requirements. Remodel the pool building 

restrooms/shower rooms to satisfy accessibility 

requirements and provide a year-round changing 

facility. Remodel a portion of the site surrounding the 

new community center and parking area to remediate 

drainage problems. The project is LEED Silver. 

1,638,569

ARRA - ADA Sidewalk 

Improvements District 1

B-30683A Sidewalk Improvements within District 1 Boundaries 180,805

ARRA - ADA Sidewalk 

Improvements District 2

B-30683B Sidewalk Improvements within District 2 Boundaries 129,780

341 - STREETS & SIDEWALKS

94
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project Project 

Number

Project Description Fund 

Allocation 

($)

ARRA - ADA Sidewalk 

Improvements District 3

B-30683C Sidewalk Improvements within District 3 Boundaries 132,035

ARRA - ADA Sidewalk 

Improvements District 4

B-30683D Sidewalk Improvements within District 4 Boundaries 174,362

ARRA - ADA Sidewalk 

Improvements District 5

B-30683E Sidewalk Improvements within District 5 Boundaries 179,935

ARRA - Brickell Key 

Bridge Rehabilitation 

Project

B-30634A The purpose of this service is to provide structural 

bridge repairs, inspection, survey, design of repairs, 

detailed construction plans, technical special 

provisions, prepare permit packages, cost estimates, 

utility coordination, FRI's and RAFs, shop drawing 

reviews and reviewing proposed repair products.

1,713,201

ARRA - NE 2 Avenue 

Improvements (36th 

Street to 42nd Street) - 

Segment B1

B-78508A Provide all project management and engineering 

analysis and design services necessary for preparing 

construction documents for the reconstruction of NE 

2nd Avenue from NE 36th Street to NE 42nd Street. 

The scope of work includes roadway reconstruction, 

stormwater system, curb and gutter, concrete sidewalk, 

signing and pavement markings, decorative lighting, 

signalization and landscape, Reference B-78508 for 

Non-ARRA Funded Segment and B-78058B for ARRA 

Funded Segment from 59th to 69th Streets.

510,979

Brickell Key Bridge 

Rehabilitation Project

B-30634 The purpose of this service is to provide structural 

bridge repairs, inspection, survey, design of repairs, 

detailed construction plans, technical special 

provisions, prepare permit packages, cost estimates, 

utility coordination, FRI's and RAFs, shop drawing 

reviews and reviewing proposed repair products.

735,000

Buena Vista East 

Lighting

B-78500B Removal of existing street lighting; installation of new 

street lighting; installation of decorative light poles 

conduit and wiring; permitting fees; field construction 

inspection of underground conduits & handholes 

installation and related surface restoration.

2,368,482

Coconut Grove Park 

Area Milling & 

Resurfacing

B-30035 The project consist of milling and resurfacing.
 609,397

95
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project Project 

Number

Project Description Fund 

Allocation 

($)

Coral Gate Roadway & 

Wall Improvements

B-30627 The project scope includes but is not limited to milling 

and resurfacing, sidewalk upgrades to meet ADA 

criteria, swale regrading, signing and pavement 

markings, and removal of the existing wall and its 

corresponding foundation to construct a 10-ft high 

precast concrete wall, and landscape improvements.


1,552,874

District 3 NW Quadrant 

- Phase 1

B-30020C Milling, resurfacing, fixing swales, sidewalk, curb and 

gutter where existing and ADA ramps, striping.

2,072,521

District 3 NW Quadrant 

- Phase II

B-30020D Milling, resurfacing, fixing swales, sidewalk, curb and 

gutter where existing and ADA ramps, striping.

450,258

Flagami Traffic 

Calming (including East 

Little Havana devices)

B-40672A Construction of traffic circles and other traffic devices 

subject to site conditions.

131,950

Flagami Traffic 

Calming Improvement 

(Phase 2)

B-40672B Construction of traffic circles. 555,469

Flagami Traffic 

Calming Phase III

B-40672C This is a traffic calming project. Various roadway 

intersections and adjacent areas were improved. 


513,940

Little River Industrial 

Park

B-30540 Study, develop alternative recommendations, and 

implementation of a variety of streetscape related items 

such as gateway signs, lighting, landscaping, and way 

finding signage for the Little River Industrial Park. 





2,000,000

Mary St-Grand Ave and 

Tiger Tail Traffic 

Calming - Civil 

Engineering Services

B-30037 Study and design of a traffic circle for the intersection 

of Mary St and Grand Avenue; Design of traffic circle or 

alternative for Tiger Tail and SW 22nd Avenue.

29,503

NW 13th Terrace B-30019H Milling, resurfacing, sidewalks, turfblock, landscapng, 

striping.

362,738

96
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project Project 

Number

Project Description Fund 

Allocation 

($)

NW 17 Avenue 

between NW 3rd and 

NW 1st Street - Install 

Guardrail - D3

B-30714 Install Guardrail 58,000

NW 24 Ave between 

NW 3 Street to NW 6 

Street - D3

B-30715 Project includes the abandoment of existing auger 

holes and the addition of new inlets and french drain 

along various streets along NW 24 Avenue and SW 24 

Road

290,542

NW 34th Avenue @ SR 

836 Roadway 

Improvements - D1

B-30702 Project consists of removing the existing paver blocks 

within the swale area between NW 13th Street to NW 

14th Street along 13th Avenue under SR 836. The 

paver blocks were replaced with gravel and a new curb 

and gutter will be constructed to prevent vehicles from 

parking along the street. As part of this contract 

drainage inlets and pipe were cleaned/desilted.

21,165

NW 35th Street - D1 B-30500D Streetscape project including milling and resurfacing, 

sidewalks, turfblock installation, landscaping, ramps, 

and striping.

356,751

Pedro Pan Monument B-30536 The scope consists of furnishing design, labor, 

materials equipment and supervision of monument 14 

ft. Ht. The project also includes the stand support for 

the Bronze plaque and sidewalk repair.


49,024

Renaming of Coconut 

Grove Streets

B-39910L Replacing Street Name signs in Coconut Grove. 2,700

Silver Bluff Traffic 

Calming - Phase 2 - D4

B-30168B Construction of traffic circles which include drainage 

improvements, curbs, gutters, milling & resurfacing, 

landscaping, and pavement markings.

1,204,936

SW 11th Street (14-17 

Avenue)

B-30034B Streetscape project including milling & resurfacing, 

sidewalks, curb and gutters, landscaping, handicap 

ramps, and striping.

753,983

SW 17 Terrace 

between SW 18 and 19 

Avenues - D4

B-30710 Drainage Improvement of SW 17th Terrace between 

SW 18th Avenue and SW 19th Avenue, milling and 

resurfacing and final striping of the resurfaced 

pavement.

65,001

SW 5th Street (55-57 

Avenue)

B-30025A Streetscape project including milling & resurfacing, 

sidewalks, curbs and gutters, landscaping, handicap 

ramps, and striping

513,828

97
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project Project 

Number

Project Description Fund 

Allocation 

($)

SW 5th Street 

Improvements

B-30026A Milling & resurfacing, curbs and gutter & sidewalk 580,137

West Grove and Center 

Grove traffic circles 

feasibility

B-30041A Traffic data collection and analysis. Feasibility study to 

determine whether or not the locations warrant traffic 

circle installation.

18,259

Belle Meade Storm 

Sewer Project, Ph 2

B-50672 Storm sewer improvements includes. solid storm water 

pipes, storm water pump station, water quality 

structure, roadway milling/resurfacing, selected road 

construction and a new outfall & surface restoration. 

Other improvements include damaged sidewalk 

replacement, new curb & gutter, new ADA compliant 

ramps, & resod of swales.





12,301,058

Flagami/West End 

Storm Sewer 

Improvements PH II

B-50695 Construction of a storm sewer system that will consist 

of new outfalls, retrofit of existing outfalls with manatee 

barriers, new exfiltration trench, storm sewer pipe for 

gravity conveyance, cross drains, catch basins, 

manholes, and surface restoration. Road 

improvements such as roadway milling & resurfacing, 

damaged sidewalk replacement, damaged curb and/or 

gutter replacement, ADA Compliant Ramp construction 

and resod of swale at the affected road blocks by the 

drainage construction.





8,731,704

Flagami/West End 

Storm Water Pump 

Stations Nos. 1, 2, 3 

and 4

B-50696 Construction of 4 new storm sewer pump stations to 

alleviate flooding problems in the Flagami/West End 

areas.





5,832,228

North Bayshore Drive 

Drainage 

Improvements - 

Partially Funded CRA 

92-686001

B-50658 Develop drainage alternatives to address the existing 

flooding & roadway conditions. Improvements under 

study include design/const new storm sewer pump sta 

& Rebuilding of the intersection @ N Bayshore Dr & NE 

18 St & new pavement @ N Bayshore Dr, between NE 

17 & 18 St.





4,586,253

352 - STORM SEWERS

98
2011-2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Project Project 

Number

Project Description Fund 

Allocation 

($)

Tamiami Storm Sewer 

Improvements Project

B-50706 Drainage Improvements consisting of French drains, 

new storm sewer outfalls, catch basins, cross drains 

and surface restoration. Road improvements such as 

roadway milling & resurfacing, damaged sidewalk 

replacement, curb and/or gutter replacement, resod of 

swales, and ADA compliant ramp construction as 

needed within project limits.


Design and construction of traffic circle at 4th Ave. 

and Flagami Blvd.





1,792,084

ARRA / Solid Waste 

Biodiesel Refuse 

Haulers

B-73202B Pucharse biodiesel refuse haulers 731,850

Solid Waste Collection 

Equipment ARRA 

Grant Match

B-73202A Purchase biodiesel refuse haulers 2,195,550

353 - SOLID WASTE

99
6.70

6.85

3.52

7.65

6.72

12.22

33.5

12.98

5.68

7.0

12.67 16.0

6.47

15.58

21.37

6.8

18.07

11.0

Application of City

Land use Designation

Pending #

N

S

R

7

SR 84

NI TE

R

S

TA

TE

9

5

N

W

3

1

S

T

A

VE

S

SR

7

N

A

ND

R

E

WS

A

VE

DAVIE BLVD

P

O

WE

R

L

NI E

R

D

NW 19 ST

N FEDERAL

HWY

SE 17 ST

INTERSTATE 595

N

O

CEA

N

D

R

NW 62ND ST

NE 26 ST

W MCNAB RD

N

D

XI EI H

WY

NE 13 ST

S

W

4

TH

A

VE

W SUNRISE BLVD

W PROSPECT RD

NE 62ND ST

W BROWARD BLVD

N

W

2

7

A

VE

S

FED

ERA

L

H

WY

SISTRUNK BLVD

E COMMERCIAL BLVD

NE

1

5

TH

A

VE

E SUNRISE BLVD

W COMMERCIAL BLVD

W OAKLAND PARK BLVD

S

A

ND

R

E

WS

A

VE

E LAS OLAS BLVD

N

A

TL

A

N

TIC

B

L

VD

S

E

3

R

D

A

VE

E OAKLAND PARK BLVD

RIVERLAND DR

NE 45TH ST

NE

4

TH

A

VE

S

W

9

TH

A

VE

NE

3

R

D

A

VE

S

W

3

1

S

T

A

VE

N

W

7

TH

A

VE

E MCNAB RD

S

A

TLA

N

TIC

BL

VD

WILTON DR

E BROWARD BLVD

ELLER DR

FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE

E

SI E

N

H

O

WE

R

B

L

VD

S

D

XI EI H

WY

E PROSPECT RD

N

E

2

0

A

VE

N

VICTORIA

PARK

RD

SE 32ND ST SE

19TH

ST

S

W

7

TH

A

VE

N

FED

ERA

L

H

W

Y

W MCNAB RD

S

ANDREWS

A

VE

S

W

3

1

S

T

A

VE

0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

A

TLA

N

TI

C

O

CEA

N

F

CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE

OFFICIAL FUTURE LAND USE MAP

JANUARY, 2011

LEGEND

*ALLOWABLE DENSITY FOR EACH IRREGULAR DISTRICT IS INDICATED ON MAP IN DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.

UTILITIES

COMMUNITY FACILITIES

COMMERCIAL

EMPLOYMENT CENTER

OFFICE PARK

INDUSTRIAL

TRANSPORTATION PARK-OPEN SPACE

LOW 4.4

LOW-MEDIUM 8

MEDIUM 15

MEDIUM-HIGH 25

HIGH 60

IRREGULAR*

**NOT A FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION

WATER**

# Broward County land use designations are in effect in annexed areas until such time City land use designations are applied

COMMERCIAL RECREATION

CONSERVATION

NW REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER

DOWNTOWN REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER

SOUTH REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER

CENTRAL BEACH REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER

REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER - PARK

REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER CONSERVATION
SW 8TH ST

S DIXIE HWY

FLOR DI A TPKE EXT

NW 27TH AVE

SW 72ND ST

SW 88TH ST

SW 216TH ST

SW 177TH AVE

SW 184TH ST

SW 117TH AVE

SW 56TH ST

BISCAYNE BLVD

SW 152ND ST

NW 36TH ST

SW 202ND AVE

SW 217TH AVE

W FLAGLER ST

SR 826 EXT

I 195

SW 67TH AVE

COLLINS AVE

SW 40TH ST

W OKEECHOBEE RD

NW 12TH ST

SW 264TH ST

SR 874 EXT

SW 200TH ST

SW 288TH ST

SW 57TH AVE

NW 7TH ST

NW 22ND AVE

SW CARD SOUND

RD

I 75 EXT

SW 24TH ST

SW 127TH AVE

NW 17TH AVE

SW 167TH AVE

SW 272ND ST

SW 147TH AVE

NW 32ND AVE

SW 197TH AVE

NW 107TH AVE

SR 112

NW 167TH ST

NW 183RD ST

N MIAMI AVE

NW 135TH ST

OLD CUTLER RD

W 4TH AVE

SW 104TH ST

SW 157TH AVE

PALM AVE

NW 199TH ST

E 4TH AVE

E 8TH AVE

SW 344TH ST

SW 328TH ST

SR 9

N KROME AVE

KROME AVE

NW 58TH ST

SW 87TH AVE

NW 97TH AVE

NW 25TH ST

NW 37TH AVE

NE 6TH AVE

SR 878

SW 97TH AVE

ALTON RD

SW 182ND AVE

SW 92ND AVE

SW 168TH ST

SW 42ND ST

SW 112TH AVE

W 12TH AVE

NW 46TH ST

NW 54TH ST

NW 79TH ST

NW 62ND ST

SW 280TH ST

SR 836 EXT

NW 57TH AVE

SW 268TH ST

NW 67TH AVE

W 16TH AVE

SW 232ND ST

W 68TH ST

NE 135TH ST

NW 47TH AVE

SW 32ND ST

SW 47TH ST

SW 296TH ST

SW 77TH AVE

NW 119TH ST

GRANADA BLVD

SW 7TH ST

I 95 EXPY

SR 934

SW 72ND AVE

GRATIGNY PKWY

OLD DIXIE HWY

NW 72ND AVE

NW 117TH AVE

SW 137TH AVE

NW 186TH ST

FRONTAGE RD

W 49TH ST

SW 144TH ST

NW 191ST ST

NW 95TH ST

NW 154TH ST

SW 27TH AVE

NW 175TH ST

E 10TH AVE

SW 1ST ST

W 60TH ST

NW 2ND AVE

NW 28TH ST

W DIXIE HWY

PINE TREE DR

SW 26TH ST

INGRAHAM

HWY

NE 159TH ST

SW 37TH AVE

SW 304TH ST

NW 215TH ST

SW 48TH ST

SW 192ND AVE

SW 22ND ST

NE 151ST ST

NW 41ST ST

SW 120TH ST

SW 62ND AVE

W 29TH ST

SW 22ND AVE

NW 14TH ST

W 44TH PL

PORT BLVD

SW 248TH ST

SW 17TH AVE

NE 163RD ST

NW 11TH ST

NW 114TH AVE

NE 79TH ST

SW 16TH ST

FLOR DI A TPKE EXPY

SW 64TH ST

W 28TH AVE

W 37TH ST

NW 77TH CT

CARIBBEAN BLVD

OPA LOCKA BLVD

LUDLAM DR

MACARTHUR CSWY

S MIAMI AVE

SW 18TH ST

E 9TH ST

HARDING AVE

SW 32ND AVE

ALI BABA AVE

SW 256TH ST

SW 320TH ST

SW 139TH AVE

SW 160TH ST

MARLIN RD

NW 29TH ST

ALHAMBRA CIR

SW 392ND ST

SW 128TH ST

SR 836 RAMP

SW 132ND AVE

E 17TH ST

E 49TH ST

SW 107TH AVE

PRAIRIE AVE

NE 125TH ST

W 8TH AVE

SW 59TH ST

NW 82ND AVE

SW 96TH ST

SW 68TH ST

W 53RD ST

PONCE DE LEON BLVD

NW 143RD ST

SW 3RD AVE

SW 112TH ST

CORAL WAY

NW 207TH ST

SW 94TH ST

96TH ST

E 21ST ST

SW 80TH ST

MER DI AI N AVE

SW 5TH TER

NE 15TH AVE

SW 42ND AVE

NW 90TH ST

NW 42ND AVE

NW 33RD ST

CRANDON

BLVD

E 65TH ST

RICKENBACKER CSWY

NE 143RD ST

SW 12TH AVE

NE 215TH ST

NW 52ND AVE

NW 127TH ST

NW 6TH AVE

NW 6TH ST

BRICKELL AVE

S BAYSHORE DR

GRAND AVE

NW 21ST ST

FRANJO RD

NW 173RD DR

NE 185TH ST

BIRD AVE

SW 376TH ST

GRIFFING BLVD

NE 19TH AVE

HIALEAH DR

I 95 EXT

SW 187TH AVE

NW 138TH ST

SW 207TH AVE

E 57TH ST

HAMMOCKS BLVD

N BAY RD

SW 16TH AVE

E 40TH ST

LENAPE DR

NE 8TH ST

NW N RIVER DR

NE 22ND AVE

JANN AVE

NE 12TH AVE

E 33RD ST

NW S RIVER DR

OCEAN BLVD

NE 123RD ST

TIGERTAIL AVE

SW 162ND AVE

DADE BLVD

NE 87TH ST

WESTWARD DR

MAIN HWY

NW 8TH ST

SW 62ND ST

W 76TH ST

SW 186TH ST

E 25TH ST

WASH NI GTON AVE

DOVE AVE

W PALM DR

BAILES RD

QUAIL ROOST DR

I 395 EXPY

NE 96TH ST

SW 66TH ST

NE 203RD ST

FONTAINEBLEAU BLVD

W 24TH AVE

SW 95TH ST

HARBOR DR

NW 17TH ST

SW 33RD ST

PERIMETER RD

NW 50TH ST

ORIOLE AVE

KENNEDY CSWY

NW 74TH ST

ANASTASIA AVE

W 20TH AVE

SHERIDAN AVE

NE 141ST ST

DEER RUN

NW 103RD ST

NE 18TH AVE

NW 106TH ST

SE 8TH AVE

SW 220TH ST

NW 169TH ST

NW 151ST ST

DOUGLAS

ROAD

EXT

SW 240TH ST

E MOWRY DR

E OKEECHOBEE RD

NW 36TH AVE

SW 2ND AVE

LITTLE RIVER DR

NW 84TH AVE

NW 74TH AVE

NW 122ND ST

NW 87TH AVE

NW 137TH AVE

NW 202ND ST

NW 92ND AVE

NW 170TH ST

SW 185TH AVE

SW 47TH TER

NW 132ND AVE

NW 78TH AVE

16TH ST

NW 116TH WAY

NE 171ST ST

NE 2ND CT

NW 15TH ST

NW 178TH ST

NW 112TH AVE

NE 179TH ST

SW 122ND AVE

NW 109TH AVE

NW 102ND AVE

NORMANDY DR

NW 20TH ST

5TH ST

NE 71ST ST

NW 81ST ST

WILLIAM LEHMAN CSWY

BYRON AVE

BOBOLINK DR

SW 211TH ST

NE 199TH ST

HARDEE RD

MAYNADA ST

N FEDERAL HWY

KILLIAN PKWY

SW 212TH ST

PALMETTO DR

NW 68TH AVE

W MOWRY DR

SE 9TH CT

NE 183RD ST

NE 121ST ST

NW 60TH AVE

NE 137TH ST

NE 103RD ST

MIAMI LAKEWAY S

71ST ST

NW 77TH AVE

NW 29TH AVE

NW 125TH ST

S KROME AVE

SW 74TH ST

MINOLA DR

HAMMOND DR

NW 203RD ST

W 47TH ST

N AUGUSTA DR

SW 85TH AVE

NI D AI N CREEK DR

NE 36TH ST

NE 207TH ST

PARK BLVD

GULFSTREAM

RD

EAST DR

SW 135TH AVE

NW 196TH ST

SW 4TH AVE

W 9TH ST

I 95 RAMP

BAY VISTA BLVD

NE 26TH AVE

SW 82ND AVE

NW 39TH CT

SW 85TH ST

PONCE DE LEON RD

W

OAKMONT DR

GRAND CANAL DR

NE 54TH ST

W 16TH ST

NE 14TH AVE

LINCOLN BLVD

W 21ST ST

W 17TH ST

ALEX MUXO BLVD

SW 145TH AVE

NW 145TH ST

W 23RD ST

SW 146TH AVE

SE 6TH AVE

W PARK DR

NE 61ST ST

W 57TH ST

SW 7TH AVE

SW 74TH AVE

W 33RD ST

NW 1ST AVE

SW FLOR DI A AVE

NE 2ND AVE

NE 213TH ST

SW 27TH ST

NE 1ST AVE

SE 12TH AVE

D CI KENS AVE

SW 78TH ST

SW 6TH AVE

SW 5TH AVE

NW 82ND ST

CORTEZ ST

NW 83RD ST

NW 3RD AVE

E PALM DR

IVES DAIRY RD

SW 142ND LN

NE 13TH AVE

SE 1ST ST

SW 22ND AVE RD

NE 177TH ST

SW 58TH AVE

NW 34TH ST

SINBAD AVE

FLORIDA TPKE RAMP

S FLAGLER AVE

SW 127TH DR

SW 352ND ST

SW 47TH AVE

E CALUSA CLUB DR

NW 161ST ST

NW 156TH ST

NE 205TH ST

NE 113TH ST

NW 19TH AVE

NW 53RD AV

N

E

W 79TH AVE

NW 196TH TER

SW 134TH AVE

NW 195TH DR

VENETIAN WAY

SR 9 RAMP

SW 118TH AVE

SW 152ND

AVE

MIRACLE MILE

COCOPLUM RD

SW 172ND AVE

NE 107TH ST

HONEY HILL DR

SW 142ND AVE

SW 136TH ST

1ST ST

NW 52ND ST

SW 70TH AVE

N SNAPPER CREEK DR

WESTWOOD DR

NW 157TH ST

NW 62ND AVE

S SPUR DR

SW 76TH AVE TAMIAMI BLVD

NE 167TH ST

NW 106TH TER

SW 111TH ST

SW 58TH TER

W 84TH ST

SW 146TH ST

W 27TH ST

SW 79TH AVE

SW 312TH ST

NW 45TH AVE

COMMERCE WAY

NW 203RD TER

NE 152ND ST

SW 14TH AVE

NE 6TH ST

SW 173RD ST

SUNNY ISLES BLVD

SR 878 RAMP

W MEADOW LAKE DR

SW 174TH ST

S

HOMESTEAD

BLVD

W 24TH ST MIAMI CIR

NW 8TH ST RD

NE 172ND ST

SAN AMARO DR

SW 360TH ST

NW 118TH

AVE

EDGEWATER DR

SE 10TH AVE

SR 112 RAMP

MILAN AVE

NE 196TH ST

NW 7TH AVE

SW 6TH ST

NW 39TH AVE

W 40TH PL

I 95

SEVILLA AVE

BROAD CSWY

LA GORCE CIR

NW 160TH ST

NW SUNSHINE STATE PKWY E

SW 82ND

RD

NE 69TH ST

NE 20TH ST

NE 95TH ST

VENETIAN CSWY

SE 8TH ST

NW 87TH ST

NW 69TH ST

SW 68TH ST RD

SW 97TH CT

E TROON CIR

DAVIS RD

NW 15TH ST RD

SW 102ND AVE

NE 168TH ST

W 18TH

AVE

NW 12TH AVE

SW 82ND AVE RD

NW 159TH ST

NW 139TH ST

85TH ST

NW 7TH AVE EXT

SR 826 RAMP

NW 114TH ST

GRATIGNY RAMP

SE 7TH ST

NE 193RD ST

NE 13TH ST

LE JEUNE RD

ROSEDALE DR

NW 207TH DR

SE 3RD ST

NW 15TH AVE

NE 88TH ST

NE 10TH AVE

NW 71ST ST

HARRISON ST

BIRD DR

SW 4TH ST

NE 119TH ST

NW 2ND ST

NW 14TH AVE

NE 15TH ST

SW 75TH AVE

NW 72ND AVE

SW 117TH AVE

SW 127TH AVE

SW 328TH ST

NW 32ND AVE

SR 826 EXT

NW 82ND AVE

S DIXIE HWY

SW 82ND AVE

NW 7TH AVE

I 195

SW 197TH AVE

SW 232ND ST

INDIAN CREEK DR

SW 328TH ST

NW 103RD ST

SW 97TH AVE

SW 102ND AVE

SW 77TH AVE

SW 142ND AVE

N KROME AVE

SW 142ND AVE

SW 6TH ST

W 84TH ST

SW 27TH ST

SW 172ND AVE

SW 122ND AVE

NW 42ND AVE

SW 96TH ST

NW 22ND AVE

SW 147TH AVE

NW 87TH ST

SW 92ND AVE

NW 199TH ST

SW 97TH AVE

NW 6TH ST

SW 280TH ST

NW 97TH AVE

SW 107TH AVE

SW 78TH ST

SW 112TH ST

SW 320TH ST

NW 32ND AVE

SW 77TH AVE

NW 14TH AVE

SW 112TH AVE

NE 199TH ST

SW 312TH ST

NW 11TH ST

NW 191ST ST

SW 128TH ST

NW 87TH ST

SW 107TH AVE

NW N RIVER DR

SW 192ND AVE

SW 42ND AVE

NW 79TH AVE

SW 137TH AVE

I 95 EXPY

NE 12TH AVE

SW 137TH AVE

NE 10TH AVE

SW 80TH ST

SW 127TH AVE

SW 137TH AVE

NW 71ST ST NW 71ST ST

SW 152ND AVE

E PALM DR

SW 162ND AVE

NE 8TH ST

SW 92ND AVE

SW 112TH AVE

NW 77TH AVE

SW 344TH ST

NW 2ND AVE

SW 112TH AVE

NW 32ND AVE

NW 207TH ST

SW 120TH ST

NE 2ND AVE

E PALM DR

OLD CUTLER RD

SW 102ND AVE

NW 72ND AVE

SW 200TH ST

SW 82ND AVE

NW 2ND AVE

NE 2ND AVE

SW 187TH AVE

SW 92ND AVE

NW 90TH ST

NW 203RD ST

SW 72ND AVE

NW 156TH ST

SW 240TH ST

SW 122ND AVE

SW 162ND AVE

KROME AVE

W 84TH ST

SW 360TH ST

SW 64TH ST

SW 132ND AVE

NW 67TH AVE

W MOWRY DR

W 4TH AVE

NW 14TH AVE

SW 47TH ST

NW 7TH ST

SR 836 RAMP

NW 2ND AVE

W 84TH ST

NW 74TH ST

SW 82ND AVE

W 8TH AVE

SW 88TH ST

I 95 EXPY

SW 162ND AVE

SW 7TH ST

SW 96TH ST

I 95 EXPY

NW 37TH AVE

SW 16TH ST

NW 42ND AVE

NW 77TH CT

SW 120TH ST

NE 207TH ST

NW 17TH AVE

NW 20TH ST

NE 14TH AVE

SW 177TH AVE

NW 6TH AVE

SW 137TH AVE

SW 147TH AVE

NW 37TH AVE

SW 134TH AVE

NW 207TH ST

SW 167TH AVE

NE 15TH ST

SW 160TH ST

SW 112TH ST

NW 7TH AVE

SW 122ND AVE

NW 151ST ST

SW 112TH ST

SW 157TH AVE

SW 62ND AVE

I 95 EXPY

SW 256TH ST

SW 157TH AVE

W 20TH AVE

NW 87TH AVE

E PALM DR

NW 106TH ST

W DIXIE HWY

SW 87TH AVE

SW 82ND AVE

NW 12TH AVE

SW 320TH ST

NW 12TH AVE NW 12TH AVE

W 20TH AVE

SW 132ND AVE

NW 62ND AVE

NE 2ND AVE

SW 240TH ST

NE 6TH AVE

INGRAHAM HWY

EAST DR

NW 215TH ST

NW 87TH AVE

SW 256TH ST

SW 107TH AVE

SW 312TH ST

W 76TH ST

NE 14TH AVE

SW 152ND AVE

SW 104TH ST

SW 328TH ST

SW 16TH ST

SW 152ND AVE

NW S RIVER DR

NE 163RD ST

E 10TH AVE

SW 127TH AVE

SW 62ND AVE

SW 48TH ST

SW 112TH AVE

SW 187TH AVE

SW 122ND AVE

SR 836 RAMP

NW 14TH AVE

SW 96TH ST

NW 57TH AVE

W 20TH AVE

SW 87TH AVE

NE 167TH ST

SW 328TH ST

SW 37TH AVE

NW 87TH AVE

NW 17TH AVE

NW 7TH ST

NW 14TH ST

SW 256TH ST

SW 152ND AVE

COLLINS

AVE

SW 280TH ST

SW 304TH ST

NE 13TH AVE

SW 296TH ST

SW 162ND AVE

INGRAHAM HWY

SW 132ND AVE

OLD CUTLER

RD

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY MAYOR

Carlos A. Gimenez

Board of County Commissioners

Joe A. MartinezChairman

Audrey M. Edmonson Vice Chairwoman

Barbara J. Jordan Lynda Bell

District 1 District 8

Jean Monestime Dennis C. Moss

District 2 District 9

Audrey M. Edmonson Sen. Javier D. Souto

District 3 District 10

Sally A. Heyman Joe A. Martinez

District 4 District 11

Bruno A. Barreiro Jose "Pepe" Diaz

District 5 District 12

Rebeca Sosa Esteban Bovo Jr.

District 6 District 13

Xavier L. Suarez

District 7

Harvey Ruvin

Clerk of Courts

Pedro J.Garcia

Property Appraiser

Alina T. Hudak

County Manager

Robert A.Cuevas Jr.

County Attorney

Prepared by the Department of Sustainability, Planning

Economic and Enhancement

Jack Osterholt, Interim Director

Miami-Dade County provides equal access and equal opportunity in employment and

services and does not discriminate on the basis of disability.

ENTIRE COUNTY MAP

LAND USE MAP MIAMI-DADE COUNTY

SUSTAINABILITY, PLANNING AND ECONOMIC

ENHANCEMENT DEPARTMENT NO

i

RTH

0 1 2

in Miles

S C A L E

LAND USE MAP

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Single-Family

Two-Family Duplexes

Mobile Home Parks

Townhouses

Low-Density Multi-Family

High-Density Multi-Family

Residential-Government Owned Housing

Transient-Residential (Hotels, Motels)

Commercial, Shopping Centers, Stadia

Office

Mixed Use-Business/Residential

Institutional

Industrial Extraction

Industrial

Industrial Intensive, Office type of use

Industrial intensive, Commercial Condominium type of use

Airports, Ports

Communications, Utilities, Terminals

Streets, Roads, Expressways, Ramps

Streets, Expressway R/W

Agriculture

Parks, Preserves, Conservation Areas

Water Conservation Areas

Vacant Government Owned, Unprotected

Vacant, Protected, Privately Owned

Vacant, Protected, Government Owned

Vacant Privately Owned, Unprotected

Canal right-of-way

Inland Waters

Ocean, Bay Waters

EXPRESSWAYS

MAJOR ROADS

MINOR ROADS

STREETS

URBAN DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY 2011
Miami-Dade 2035 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Cost Feasible Projects

PDE/De

sign ROW CST OM TOTAL PDE/De sign ROW CST 

Bike/Ped set aside $27.9 $27.9 $24.7 Existing Public Works

Facilities O&M $317.9 $317.9 

Congestion Management setaside $51.4 $51.4 $65.6 

1st Street Bridge over Miami River US‐1 Bridge replacement $96.5 $96.5 

Golden Glades Multi‐modal

Facility Upgrade

Capacity improvement, including a pedestrian

overpass to connect Golden Gladesintermodal center to business park west of

CSX tracks

$0.9 $3.2 $2.7 $6.8 

Golden Glades Multi‐modal

Terminal Tri‐Rail/MDT Terminal

1,000 space deck, intermodal center with

improved bus circulation and improved ADA,

Replace multiple existing pedestrian bridges

with a single‐level bridge

$20.4 $20.4 

I‐95 (NB) Ramp to

Turnpike/SR 826 Add 1 auxiliary/acceleration lane $1.8 $18.0 $19.8 

Miami Beach Intermodal

Center

63rd StreetCollins Avenue

87th Street

West Bay Drive New North Beach bus transfer station $3.4 $3.4 

NW 14th Street Civic Center Biscayne Boulevard Widen to 3 lanes (2 to 3) $0.3 $1.3 $0.2 $1.7 

NW 25th Street NW 89th Court HEFT

Traffic signal improvements; improve

intersections to accommodate truck

movements.

$3.0 $20.2 $23.2 

NW 25th Street NW 89th Court SR 826 Widen to 6 lanes (4 to 6) $32.4 $32.4 

NW 25th Street Viaduct SR 826 NW 87th Court Phase 2 ‐ construction of Viaduct from SR 826

to NW 87th Court $128.7 $128.7 

NW 87th Avenue NW 36th Street NW 58th Street Widen to 6 lanes (4 to 6) $0.8 $2.4 $13.6 $0.1 $17.0 

NW 87th Avenue extension NW 58th Street NW 95th Street Extend to connect the freight hubs of Doral and Medley $3.0 $10.1 $0.3 $13.4 

NW 107th Avenue NW 41st Street NW 25th Street Widen to 6 lanes (4 to 6) $0.8 $5.0 $12.5 $0.1 $18.4 

NW 107th Avenue 1000ft N of NW 122nd Street Okeechobee Road Widen bridge over Miami Canal $5.9 $0.1 $6.0 

NW South River Drive NW 19th Street NW 23rd Avenue Widen Tamiami Swing Bridge to 4 lanes (2 to 4) $2.2 $44.6 $0.1 $46.9 

Parking expansion at Opa‐

Locka Tri‐Rail station

Opa‐Locka Tri‐Rail

Station

Opa‐Locka Tri‐Rail station parking

improvements $0.4 $2.6 $3.0 

Port of Miami Construct parking garage ‐ intermodal hub capacity $10.5 $10.5 

Port Of Miami Tunnel Port of Miami SR‐836/I‐395 Tunnel (port alternative access) $1.5 $329.7 $331.2 $400.6 

South Beach bus transfer

station New South Beach bus transfer station $1.8 $1.8 

SR 25/Okeechobee Road at NW 154th Street Traffic signals $1.9 $1.9 

SR 823/NW 57th Avenue/Red

Road W 19th Street W 23rd Street Widen to 6 lanes (4 to 6) $31.5 $31.5 

SR 823/NW 57th Avenue/RedRoad Okeechobee Road W 19th Street Widen to 5 lanes (4 to 5) $15.4 $15.4 

SR 823/NW 57th Avenue/RedRoad W 53rd Street W 65th Street Widen to 6 lanes (4 to 6) $25.9 $25.9 

SR 823/NW 57th Avenue

/Red Road W 23rd Street W 46th Street Widen to 6 lanes (4 to 6) $43.2 $43.2 

Facility From To Description

YOE Cost (in millio

II

2015‐2020

III

2021‐2025

Priority II-IV (2015-2035) Page 1
Miami-Dade 2035 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Cost Feasible Projects

PDE/De

sign ROW CST OM TOTAL PDE/De sign ROW CST 

Facility From To Description

YOE Cost (in millio

II

2015‐2020

III

2021‐2025

SR 860/NW 186th

Street/Miami Gardens Drive NW 97th Avenue I‐75 New 4 lanes $2.2 $15.8 $10.9 $28.8 

SR 997/Krome Avenue SW 136th Street Kendall Drive Widen to 4 lanes (2 to 4) $0.0 

SR 997/Krome Avenue SR 94/Kendall Drive SR 90/SW 8th Street Widen to 4 lanes (2 to 4) $52.9 $52.9 

SW 137th Avenue US‐1 SW 184th Street Widen to 4 lanes (2 to 4) $28.8 $28.8 

SW 137th Avenue SW 24th Street SW 8th Street Widen to 6 lanes (4 to 6) $0.6 $8.5 $0.1 $9.1 

SW 264th Street US‐1 SW 147th Avenue New 2‐lane $0.1 $0.5 $2.5 $0.1 $3.2 

SW 264th/SW 268th St SW 147th Ave SW 112th Avenue Roadway improvements $1.3 $4.1 $20.7 $0.4 $26.4 

SW 320th Street/Mowry

Drive S. Dixie Highway SW 187th Avenue Widen to 4 lanes with continuous left turn lanes (2 to 4) $3.6 $4.6 $18.2 $0.1 $26.5 

SW 328th Street/North Canal

Drive US‐1 Intersection improvements ‐ add turn lanes $0.1 $0.1 $0.5 $0.1 $0.8 

Truck Parking Improvement Okeechobee Road

Provide a location in the area of Okeechobee

and the HEFT for long‐term truck parking and

staging.

$0.3 $1.3 $1.7 $3.2 

Truck Parking Improvement

Develop a truck staging area near NW 36th

Street and NW 37th Avenue for the Port of

Miami River.

$0.4 $1.2 $2.7 $4.4 

West 24th Avenue W 52nd Street W 76th Street Widen to 5 lanes (2 to 5) $0.4 $13.2 $0.6 $14.2 

Downtown/Port Access

Construct I‐95 NB Slip Ramp on NW 6th St;

Implement NE/NW 5th/6th St/Port Blvd.

improvements for access between POM and I‐

95 slip ramp

$0.1 $0.1 $43.3 

I‐95

Golden Glades

Interchange Broward County Line Special use lanes (managed lanes) $0.0 $105.1 

MIC Loan Repayment $0.0 $93.0 

SR 821/HEFT Eureka Drive Kendall Drive Widen to 8‐, 10‐, 12‐lanes plus auxiliary lanes $0.0 $550.3 

SR 826/Palmetto Expressway SR 836 NW 87th Avenue on I‐ 75 Special use lanes $87.3 $87.3 $68.3 

SR 826/Palmetto Expressway@ 67th Avenue

Interchange improvements ‐ reconstruct as

SPUI interchange $0.0 $143.7 

SR 836/Dolphin Expressway NW 12th Avenue Ramp to I‐95 Ramp to I‐95 $0.0 $184.5 

SR 886/Port Bridge Repairs to bascule rail and vehicle bridge $0.0 $5.7 

SR 924/Gratigny ParkwayExtension (west) SR 826/I‐75 HEFT Limited access facility providing a connection between HEFT, I‐75, SR 924, SR 826 $42.2 $79.2 $121.4 $371.8 

SW 127th Avenue SW 120th Street SW 144th Street New 4 lanes / Widen to 4 lanes $0.6 $2.5 $3.1 $12.2 

SW 152nd Street SW 147th Avenue SW 157th Avenue Widen to 4 lanes (2 to 4) $0.0 $0.7 $11.5 

Venetian Causeway Bridge Bayshore Drive Purdy Avenue Bridge replacement $4.9 $4.9 $185.9 

Farmlife Roadway Expansion SW 312th Street (Campbell Drive) SW 328th (Lucy Street) Widen to 4 lanes with left turn lanes (2 to 4) $0.0 

Freight Rail Safety and

Security

Safety and security enhancements of freight

transportation system, including gradecrossing improvements and signal upgrades

$0.0 

Priority II-IV (2015-2035) Page 2
Miami-Dade 2035 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Cost Feasible Projects

PDE/De

sign ROW CST OM TOTAL PDE/De sign ROW CST 

Facility From To Description

YOE Cost (in millio

II

2015‐2020

III

2021‐2025

I‐395 East of I‐95 MacArthur Causeway Bridge Major capital improvement $210.9 $210.9 $397.5 

Medley Bridge/CanalImprovement Program

NW 121 Way, NW 116

Way, NW 105 Way, NW

79 Ave

Improve the connections between

Okeechobee Rd and Medley through a

combination of bridge widening and canal

improvements (NW 121 Way, NW 116 Way,

NW 105 Way, NW 79 Ave)

$0.0 

Miami Intermodal Center Central Station $81.5 $81.5 

Miami Intermodal Center (MIC) Bus Plaza Rd NW 25th St $0.4 $0.4 

NW 82nd Avenue NW 8th Street NW 12th Street New 4 lanes $0.0 

NW 97th Avenue NW 58th Street NW 74st Street New 4 lanes / Widen to 4 lanes $0.0 

NW 170th Street HEFT NW 97th Avenue New 6 lanes $0.0 

Perimeter Road NW 20th Street NW 57th Avenue Widen to 4 lanes (2 to 4) $0.0 

South Florida Rail Corridor North of Hialeah Market North of MIC Double tracking of the remaining single track of Tri‐Rail $0.0 

SR 5/US‐1/ Biscayne

Boulevard

Expand SB left turn lane for trucks entering

Port $0.0 

SR 823/NW 57th Avenue/Red

Road W 65th Street W 84th Street Widen to 6 lanes (4 to 6) $0.0 

SR 826/Palmetto Expressway

(EB) to I‐95 (NB)

Operational improvement within the Golden

Glades Interchange $0.0 

SR 826/Palmetto Expressway

@ 57th Avenue

Interchange Improvements ‐ reconstruct asSPUI interchange $0.0 

SR 826/Palmetto Expressway

(NB) Okeechobee Road NW 103rd Street Addition of 1 auxiliary lane $0.0 

SR 826/Palmetto Expressway

(EB) to NW 167th Street

Operational improvement within the Golden

Glades Interchange $0.0 

SR‐826 & SR‐836 INT NW 87TH NW 57TH AVENUE $45.4 $45.4 

SR 836/Dolphin Expressway NW 87th Avenue Interchange improvement $0.0 

SR 874/Don Shula

Expressway Ramp Connector

SW 136th Street SR 874 Ramp connection to SW 136th Street $32.0 $32.0 

SR 924/Gratigny ParkwayExtension (east) NW 32nd Avenue I‐95 Limited access facility providing E/W mobility to I‐95 $62.1 $108.0 $170.1 $238.3 

SR 985/SW 107th Avenue SW 8th Street Flagler Street Widen to 6 lanes (4 to 6) $0.0 

SR 997/Krome Avenue North of SW 8th Street Mile post 2.754 Widen to 4 lanes (2 to 4) $0.0 

SR 997/Krome Avenue SR‐5/US‐1 SW 328th Street (Lucy Street) Widen to 4 lanes (2 to 4) $0.0 

SR 997/Krome Avenue SW 296th Street SW 136th Street Widen to 4 lanes (2 to 4 ) $0.0 $91.0 

SR 997/Krome Truck By‐Pass Along Flagler Avenue/ Civic Court NW 6th Street New 2 lanes (Companion project with Krome widening SW 328th Street to SW 296th Street) $0.0 

SR 997/Krome Avenue SW 328th Street (Lucy Street) SW 296th Street Widen to 4 lanes (2 to 4) (Companion project with Krome truck by‐pass) $0.0 

SR 997/Krome Avenue Mile post 2.754 Mile post 5.122 Widen to 4 lanes (2 to 4) $0.0 

SR 997/Krome Avenue Mile post 5.122 Mile post 8.151 Widen to 4 lanes (2 to 4) $0.0 

Priority II-IV (2015-2035) Page 3
Miami-Dade 2035 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Cost Feasible Projects

PDE/De

sign ROW CST OM TOTAL PDE/De sign ROW CST 

Facility From To Description

YOE Cost (in millio

II

2015‐2020

III

2021‐2025

SR 997/Krome Avenue Mile post 8.151 Mile post 10.626 Widen to 4 lanes (2 to 4) $0.0 

SR 997/Krome Avenue Mile post 10.626 Mile post 14.184 Widen to 4 lanes (2 to 4) $0.0 

SW 72nd Street/Sunset Drive SW 117th Avenue SW 157th Avenue Widen to 6 lanes (4 to 6) $0.0 

SW 104th Street/Killian

Parkway SW 160th Avenue SW 167th Avenue New 4 lanes / Widen to 4 lanes $0.0 

SW 157th Avenue SW 8th Street SW 42nd Street New 4 lanes / Widen to 4 lanes $0.0 

SW 157th Avenue SW 184th Street SW 216th Street New 2 lanes $0.0 

SW 200th Street US‐1 Quail Roost Drive Widen to 4 lanes (2 to 4) $0.0 

SW 312th Street/CampbellDrive

Turnpike access ramps (west‐to‐north and

south‐to‐west) $0.0 

SW 312th Street/CampbellDrive SW 152nd Avenue SW 137th Avenue Widen to 6 lanes with left turn lanes (4 to 6) $0.0 

SW 312th Street/CampbellDrive

NW 14th Avenue

SW 176th Avenue

SW 197th Ave

HEFT Widen to 6 lanes (4 to 6) $0.0 

US‐1 (Busway) SW 88th Street Florida City Additional park‐and‐ride lots at selected locations $5.9 $5.9 $42.5 

US‐1 (Busway) SW 88th Street Florida City Bus signal priority $0.0 

West Avenue North of Lincoln Road South of 18th Street New connector bridge $0.0 

Transit Maintenance of Effort $1,113.0 $3,922.0 $5,035.0 $1,270.0 

Partially Funded $431.6 $28.6 $0.0 $0.0 $460.1 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 

TOTAL $596.4 $473.8 $2,440.1 $4,242.1 $7,751.8 $0.7 $133.5 $4,171.8 

Priority II-IV (2015-2035) Page 4
INTRODUCTION 

The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) plan is a 

planning document that sets forth the City's capital 

improvements to ensure that municipal facilities 

are appropriate and adequate to serve the needs of 

the people of Fort Lauderdale. Historically, the 

City Commission has adopted the CIP plan 

annually. The 2012-2016 CIP was adopted by the 

City Commission on September 7, 2011. 

The plan shows previously funded projects that 

have remaining balances. The 5-year CIP Plan is 

balanced based on expected revenues, bonds and 

other financing mechanisms. 

The projects in the CIP Plan provide the basic 

necessities, such as the municipal water works, as 

well as amenities which make Fort Lauderdale 

such a desirable community in which to live and 

work. The following objectives are key to the 

review process: 

 Conformity with the City's Comprehensive 

Plan. 

 Coordination of capital improvements with 

the development of the operating budget to 

maintain a reasonable tax levy. 

The CIP Plan adopts $65,788,115 million of 

improvements in FY 2012, of which: 

 $2,262,650 in improvements are 

attributable to the City's General Fund; 

 $26,957,000 from CRA contributions to 

General Fund for the new aquatics 

complex and other related projects; 

 $10,740,000 from other funding 

contributions to General Fund projects; 

 $300,000 for CDBG related projects; 

 $18,420,000 is related to the City's Water 

& Sewer System; 

 $3,365,250 for Grant related projects; 

 $1,800,000 is related to the Waste Water 

Regional Repair and Restoration projects; 

 $1,598,215 for improvements to the 

Executive Airport; and 

 $345,000 for Parking Services. 

The City’s adopted operating budget specifically 

identifies several projects to be included in this 

year's CIP plan, and each capital project must have 

approved funding authorized by the City 

Commission before work begins. 

The City recognizes on-going responsibility to 

maintain and improve its capital facilities to meet 

the demands of a dynamic city. The 5-year CIP 

Plan is based on City Commission and 

Administration’s recognition of the need to have a 

comprehensive and financially balanced plan. 

The methodology used to develop the CIP Plan 

stems from a needs assessment performed by City 

staff. The assessments generate projects that 

address physical and/or structural improvements 

and improvements to programs or services that are 

provided to the public. CIP Applications are 

submitted to the Research and Budget Division. 

Each application that involves a physical or 

structural improvement must have a project cost 

estimate form completed by an engineer attached. 

The Department Director will determine the 

priority according to the following: 

 Public Safety, which means the project is 

related to life, safety, ADA compliance, or 

health concerns; 

 City Commission Request, which means 

the City Commission has requested this 

project based upon his/her 

recommendation; 

 City Manager Request, which means the 

City Management, has requested the 

project based upon his assessment. 

The application must be completed in its entirety 

or it will be rejected. Assessments of the project 

applications are analyzed by City Management 

and further prioritized for recommendation to the 

City Commission. After review and adoption, 

funded projects are implemented. 

Under the guidance of the City Management, the 

Research and Budget division and Public Works 

have assembled the adopted FY 2012-2016 CIP 

Plan. Together, the managers and directors 

develop the CIP plan for meeting and managing 

the City’s capital improvement needs. 

Capital Improvement Program

City of Fort Lauderdale, FL 225 Fiscal Year 2012
The City recognizes that the CIP Plan must be 

within the financial parameters necessary to 

preserve the City’s fiscal integrity. Pursuant to the 

City's long range planning objectives, each project 

is analyzed and prioritized according to needs of 

the community, relative priority, and the City's 

ability to implement the project using available 

resources. 

The CIP Plan is not a budget. The 5-year CIP Plan 

is presented annually to the City Commission for 

adoption. 

A capital improvement project must meet the 

following criteria to be a candidate for the CIP 

Plan: 

 represent a physical improvement; 

 have an anticipated life of not less than 

 10 years; and 

 cost $50,000 or more. 

The CIP Plan contains the following major 

sections: 

 Introduction: 

 FY 2012 CIP Plan: 

A brief description of the adopted projects 

for FY 2012 and the financing sources. 

 FY 2012 Funding Sources and 

Appropriations: 

Includes first year approved and funded 

projects. This section also designates 

routine and non-routine projects. 

 Long Range CIP Plan (Five-Year Plan): 

Information relevant to all approved 

capital projects from the previous CIP Plan 

and this 5-year CIP Plan is included here. 

Also listed are projects, which have been 

identified, but not yet programmed or do 

not have a funding source identified. 

These projects require: 

 Additional coordination with other 

levels of government; 

 Additional funding from outside 

sources; 

 The completion of other projects; 

and 

 Additional project information. 

The projects are reviewed annually and are 

entered into the applicable program years 

when the funding source is determined and 

the needs of the community are met. 

 Summaries: 

This section displays the first year 

appropriations by fund and summary of 

potential financial sources. 

Capital Improvement Program City of Fort Lauderdale, FL 226 Fiscal Year 2012
FY 2012 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BY DEPARTMENT 

Business Enterprises 

Business Enterprises includes the Fort Lauderdale Aquatics Center, War Memorial Auditorium, Cemeteries and Marine 

Services. Although the Executive Airport operates under Business Enterprises, it is included under Enterprise Funds. 

Estimated FY 2012 CIP Projects: $0

Summary of FY 2012 Projects 

 No Projects Identified for FY 2012 

 5-Year CIP Total for Business Enterprises: $8,948,559

Economic Development 

Economic Development includes projects that will focus on streetscape improvement and pedestrian pathways. 

Estimated FY 2012 CIP Projects: $27,257,000

Summary of FY 2012 Projects 

 Almond Avenue Streetscape - $130,000 

 Aquatic Center -$25,000,000 

 Beach Wall Decorative Lighting System - $279,000 

 Broward Center of the Performing Arts (PACA) -$300,000 

 Channel Square - $200,000 

 Intracoastal Promenade (Perimeter Promenade Only) $246,500 

 Las Olas Beach Plaza - $30,000 

 Oceanside Plaza - $450,000 

 Sebastian Street/Alhambra Street Site - $300,000 

 SR A1A Beachfront Promenade - $75,000 

 SR A1A Streetscape Improvements (Westside) - $246,500 

5-Year CIP Total for Economic Development: $84,729,000

Fire 

Fire Rescue projects are scheduled in the future years while the Fire Bond program continues construction of new stations. 

Estimated FY 2012 CIP Projects: $ 0 

____________________________________ 

Summary of FY 2012 Projects 

 No Projects Identified for FY 2012 

 5-Year CIP Total for Fire Bond: $6,672,504

Information Systems 

Information Systems’ capital improvements include an off-site data 

center and the refurbishment of a radio tower, which are scheduled 

for future years. 

Estimated FY 2012 CIP Projects: $0 

Summary of FY 2012 Projects 

 No Projects Identified for FY 2012 

 5-Year CIP Total for Information Systems: $1,500,000 

Capital Improvement Program City of Fort Lauderdale, FL 227 Fiscal Year 2012
FY 2012 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BY DEPARTMENT 

Parks & Recreation 

The Parks and Recreation Department is responsible for City Parks including preserves, ball field playgrounds, tennis and 

basketball courts, some facilities that are not included in the Public Works - facilities section and a tree-planting program. 

Estimated FY 2012 CIP Projects: $560,650 

Summary of FY 2012 Projects 

 Beach Community Center Floor - $54,000 

 Bill Keith Preserve - $191,650 

 Gore Betz Park - $50,000 

 Holiday Park Improvements - $65,000 

 Jimmy Evert Tennis Court Renovations - $100,000 

 Osswald Fencing, Security & Golf Course Lights - $100,000 

 

 5-Year CIP Total for Parks & Recreation: $24,006,520

Planning & Zoning

Planning & Zoning capital improvements focus on streetscape and 

pedestrian improvements, improved mobility options, and design and construction for enhanced public places.

 Estimated FY 2012 CIP Projects: $0

Summary of FY 2012 Projects 

 No Projects Identified for FY 2012 

 5-Year CIP Total for Planning & Zoning: $33,899,000

Police 

Police capital improvements fund Police facilities and safety & security 

equipment. 

Estimated FY 2012 CIP Projects: $0

Summary of FY 2012 Projects 

 No Projects Identified for FY 2012 

5-Year CIP Total for Police: $104,470,926 

Capital Improvement Program City of Fort Lauderdale, FL 228 Fiscal Year 2012
FY 2012 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BY DEPARTMENT 

Public Works 

Public Works is comprised of five divisions: 1) The General Services Bureau is responsible for Sanitation service and 

general engineering projects, 2) Transportation is primarily responsible for the regular maintenance of city streets and for the 

coordination of projects with the County and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), 3) Bridges is tasked with 

improving bridges on city streets and is funded by state transportation allocations, 4) Neighborhood Services is responsible 

for improvements that enhance the aesthetics of the City’s neighborhoods by providing matching funds and professional 

services to make those improvements, and 5) Facilities is mainly responsible for the improvement and maintenance of 

approximately 130 city owned buildings. Water and Sewer and Stormwater also operate under Public Works, but are 

included within the Enterprise Funds.

Estimated FY 2012 CIP Projects: $12,442,000

Summary of FY 2012 Projects 

 ADA Settlement - $200,000

 Annual Asphalt Concrete Resurfacing - $740,000

 Bridge Reconstructions (5 bridges FDOT project) Eastments & Utility Relocs - $250,000

 Bridge Repairs at Several Locations - $100,000

 Business Capital Improvement Program - $100,000

 Concrete and Paver Maintenance - $100,000

 Downtown Transit Connector- The Wave - $10,000,000

 Las Olas Transportation Plan Implementation - $100,000

 Marshal’s Point Bridge Noise Mitigation - $152,000

 Neighborhood Capital Improvements - $500,000

 South middle River Right of Way Improvements - $100,000

 Top of the Tunnel North Extension and Public Space - $100,000

 5-Year CIP Total for Public Works General Services: $314,030,213

 



Routine capital expenditures. 

Capital Improvement Program City of Fort Lauderdale, FL 229 Fiscal Year 2012
FY 2012 ENTERPRISE FUNDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BY FUND 

Airport 

Airport capital improvements fund runways, facilities, grounds and security. 

Estimated FY 2012 CIP Projects: $4,963,465

Summary of FY 2012 Projects 

 Airport Airfield Infrastructure Improvements - $200,000

 Construct Airport Security Annex - $20,000

 Design & Construct T/W Echo Extension - $6,250

 Design & Construct Customs Building/Apron - $3,430,000

 Executive Airport Facilities Improvement - $25,000

 Executive Airport Landbanking Program - $50,000

 Executive Airport Landscaping Program - $25,000

 Helistop Infrastructure Recapitalization - $50,000

 Noise Program Enhancements - $25,000

 R/W 26, 13-31 By-Pass Taxiways -$ 221,250

 Taxilane Charlie Pavement & Lighting Rehab -$244,090

 Taxiway C & D Pavement Rehabilitation - $280,000

 TaxiwayEcho Pavement Rehabilitation - $386,875

 5-Year CIP Total for Airport: $28,559,015

Central Services 

Capital Improvements for the Central Services fund are for the Print Shop. 

Estimated FY 2012 CIP Projects: $0

Summary of FY 2012 Projects 

 No Projects Identified for FY 2012

 5-Year CIP Total for Central Services: $100,000

Parking & Fleet Services 

Parking capital improvements fund facilities, parking lots and vehicle purchases. 

Estimated FY 2012 CIP Projects: $345,000

Summary of FY 2012 Projects 

 Parking – Right of Way Improvements and Metering - $345,000

 5-Year CIP Total for Parking: $47,160,000

 



 Includes Grant Funds. 



Routine capital expenditures. 

Capital Improvement Program City of Fort Lauderdale, FL 230 Fiscal Year 2012
FY 2012 ENTERPRISE FUNDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BY FUND

Water & Sewer, Region and Stormwater 

Water & Sewer capital improvements fund facilities, wells, water mains, waste water systems and pump stations. Region 

capital improvements fund wastewater treatment plant and system facilities. Stormwater capital improvements fund drainage 

systems. 

Estimated FY 2012 CIP Projects: $20,220,000

Note: Water and Sewer Bond Funded appropriations are made to specific utility projects when presented to the Commission 

for approval during the year. 

Summary of FY 2012 Projects 

 Annual Sanitary Sewer Rehab - $350,000

 Annual Water Services Replacement - $250,000

 Distribution and Collection R & R - $400,000

 Dixie Wellfield - $50,000

 Dixie Wellfield Raw Water Main Replacement - $4,000,000

 IT Special Projects/R&R - $200,000

 Las Olas Blvd Large Watermain Improvement - $3,300,000

 Oakland Park Blvd Water Main - $2,000,000

 Peele Dixie Renewal & Replacement Projects - $130,000

 Peele Dixie Additional Water Supply Construction - $1,000,000

 Sanitary Sewer Collection System Rehab-Basin A-18 - $1,250,000

 Sanitary Sewer Collection System Rehab-Basin A-7 - $2,000,000

 Sanitary Sewer Collection System Rehab-Basin B-6 - $1,350,000

 Shady Banks Small Water Main Improvements - $1,240,000

 Small Water Main Replacement - $500,000 

 Water Treatment Plant Repair & Replacement - $400,000

 Regional R & R - $1,800,000

 5 Year CIP Total for Water and Sewer and Region: $78,371,100

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Includes Grant Funds.



Routine capital expenditures.

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OPERATING IMPACT

Capital projects can be categorized as either routine or 

non-routine. Routine projects are included the Capital 

Improvement Program yearly and have a regularly 

replacement cycle. 

FY 2012 Non-Routine Projects is $60,298,115 

FY 2012 Routine Projects is $5,490,000

Capital projects that are budgeted from Enterprise 

Funds do not necessarily have an impact on the General 

Fund. However, some projects that are budgeted or 

require some initial funding from the General Fund may 

have additional operating costs such as tree 

management, mowing, electricity, and various 

maintenance costs. 

The impact of capital project operating costs on the 

annual budget requires careful consideration. Operating 

costs are a fundamental element of the City’s Capital 

Improvement Program and the budget development 

process. 

Reliable operating cost estimates are necessary from the 

onset of each budget cycle because the City must 

determine specific ongoing expenses it will incur once a 

project has been approved. During the cost estimating 

phase of the CIP development, factors such as a 

project’s location, structural impacts, future 

maintenance and/or replacement are thoroughly 

analyzed. 

The operating impact for projects in the FY 2012 CIP 

Plan is $44,776. 

Capital Improvement Program City of Fort Lauderdale, FL 231 Fiscal Year 2012
General

Fund Gas Tax CRA CDBG Grants Total

Sources

General Fund CIP Unreserved Fund Balance/Closed 

Project Balances $ 2,262,650 - - - - 2,262,650

Gas Tax Fund - 740,000 - - - 740,000

Beach CRA - - 26,957,000 - - 26,957,000

CDBG - - - 300,000 - 300,000

Grants - - - - 10,000,000 10,000,000

Total CIP Funding Sources - General Government $ 2,262,650 740,000 26,957,000 300,000 10,000,000 40,259,650

Sources Airport

FAA & 

FDOT 

Grants Parking Region Water & Sewer Total

Airport Fund $ 1,598,215 - - - - 1,598,215

Airport Grants - 3,365,250 - - - 3,365,250

Parking Fund - - 345,000 - - 345,000

Regional Fund - - - 1,800,000 - 1,800,000

Water & Sewer Fund - - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000

Water & Sewer Capital Projects Fund Balance - - - - 2,350,000 2,350,000

Water & Sewer Fund Balance or Debt Issuance - - - 15,070,000 15,070,000

Total CIP Funding Sources - Enterprise Funds $ 1,598,215 3,365,250 345,000 1,800,000 18,420,000 25,528,465

Grand Total CIP Funding Sources 65,788,115

2012 - 2016 CIP PLAN

FUNDING SOURCES FOR FY 2012 APPROPRIATIONS - ENTERPRISE FUNDS

CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE

2012 - 2016 CIP PLAN

FUNDING SOURCES FOR FY 2012 APPROPRIATIONS - GENERAL GOVERNMENT

CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE

Capital Improvement Program City of Fort Lauderdale, FL 232 Fiscal Year 2012
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE

2012-2016 CIP PLAN

FY 2012 APPROPRIATIONS BY PROJECT - GENERAL FUND

Gas

CIP Project Name General Tax CRA CDBG Grants Total

Economic Development

Almond Avenue Streetscape $ - - 130,000 - - 130,000

Aquatic Center - - 25,000,000 - - 25,000,000

Beach Wall Decorative Lighting System - - 279,000 - - 279,000

Broward Center of the Performing Arts (PACA) Plan 300,000 - - - - 300,000

Channel Square - - 200,000 - - 200,000

Intracoastal Promenade (Perimeter Promenade Only) - - 246,500 - - 246,500

Las Olas Beach Plaza - - 30,000 - - 30,000

Oceanside Plaza - - 450,000 - - 450,000

Sebastian St./Alhambra St. Site - - 300,000 - - 300,000

SR A1A Beachfront Promenade - - 75,000 - - 75,000

SR A1A Streetscape Improvements (Westside) - - 246,500 - - 246,500

Total Economic Development $ 300,000 - 26,957,000 - - 27,257,000

Parks & Recreation

Beach Community Center Floor Replacement $ 54,000 - - - - 54,000

Bill Keith Preserve: Shoreline/ Rip-Rap Portion 191,650 - - - - 191,650

Gore Betz Park 50,000 - - - - 50,000

Holiday Park Improvements 65,000 - - - - 65,000

Jimmy Evert Tennis Court Renovations 100,000 - - - - 100,000

Osswald Fencing, Security & Golf Course Lights 100,000 - - - - 100,000

Total Parks & Recreation $ 560,650 - - - - 560,650

Public Works

ADA Settlement - General Fund $ - - - 200,000 - 200,000

Annual Asphalt Concrete Resurfacing - 740,000 - - - 740,000

Bridge Reconstruction Easements & Utility Relocs 250,000 - - - - 250,000

Bridge Repairs at Several Locations 100,000 - - - - 100,000

Business Capital Improvement Program 100,000 - - - - 100,000

Concrete and Paver Maintenance 100,000 - - - - 100,000

Downtown Transit Connector - The Wave - - - - 10,000,000 10,000,000

Las Olas Transportation Plan Implementation 100,000 - - - - 100,000

Marshal's Point Bridge Noise Mitigation 152,000 - 152,000

Neighborhood Capital Improvements 500,000 - - - - 500,000

South Middle River Right of Way Improvements - - - 100,000 - 100,000

Top of the Tunnel North Extension and Public Space 100,000 - - - - 100,000

Total Public Works $ 1,402,000 740,000 - 300,000 10,000,000 12,442,000

Total Appropriations Government Projects $ 2,262,650 740,000 26,957,000 300,000 10,000,000 40,259,650

Capital Improvement Program City of Fort Lauderdale, FL 233 Fiscal Year 2012
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE

2012-2016 CIP PLAN

FY 2012 APPROPRIATIONS BY PROJECT - ENTERPRISE FUNDS

FAA & Water

FDOT and

CIP Project Name Airport Grants Parking Region Sewer Total

Airport

Airport Airfield Infrastructure Improvements $ 200,000 - - - - 200,000

Construct Airport Security Annex 20,000 - - - - 20,000

Design & Construct T/W Echo Extension 6,250 - - - - 6,250

Design & Construct Customs Building/Apron 686,000 2,744,000 - - - 3,430,000

Executive Airport Facilities Improvement 25,000 - - - - 25,000

Executive Airport Land Banking Program 50,000 - - - - 50,000

Executive Airport Landscaping Program 25,000 - - - - 25,000

Helistop Infrastructure Recapitalization 50,000 - - - - 50,000

Noise Program Enhancements 25,000 - - - - 25,000

R/W 26,13-31 By-Pass Taxiways 221,250 - - - - 221,250

Taxilane Charlie Pavement & Lighting Rehab 244,090 - - - - 244,090

Taxiway C & D Pavement Rehabilitation - 280,000 - - - 280,000

Taxiway Echo Pavement Rehabilitation 45,625 341,250 - - - 386,875

Total Airport $ 1,598,215 3,365,250 - - - 4,963,465

Parking

Parking- Right Of Way Improvements and Metering $ - - 345,000 - - 345,000

Total Parking $ - - 345,000 - - 345,000

Region

Regional R & R $ - - - 1,800,000 - 1,800,000

Total Region $ - - - 1,800,000 - 1,800,000

Water and Sewer

Annual Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation $ - - - - 350,000 350,000

Annual Water Services Replacement - - - - 250,000 250,000

Distribution & Collection R&R - - - - 400,000 400,000

Dixie Wellfield - - - - 50,000 50,000

Dixie Wellfield Raw Water Main Replacement - - - - 4,000,000 4,000,000

IT Special Projects/R&R - - - - 200,000 200,000

Las Olas Blvd Large Water Main Improvements - - - - 3,300,000 3,300,000

Oakland Park Blvd Water Main - - - - 2,000,000 2,000,000

Peele Dixie Renewal and Replacement Projects - - - - 130,000 130,000

Peele-Dixie Additional Water Supply Construction - - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000

Sanitary Sewer Collection System Rehab-Basin A-18 - - - - 1,250,000 1,250,000

Sanitary Sewer Collection System Rehab-Basin A-7 - - - - 2,000,000 2,000,000

Sanitary Sewer Collection System Rehab-Basin B-6 - - - - 1,350,000 1,350,000

Shady Banks Small Water Main Improvements - - - - 1,240,000 1,240,000

Small Water Main Replacement - - - - 500,000 500,000

Water Treatment Plant Repair and Replacement - - - - 400,000 400,000

 Total Water and Sewer $ - - - - 18,420,000 18,420,000

Total Enterprise Funds First Year Projects $ 1,598,215 3,365,250 345,000 1,800,000 18,420,000 25,528,465

Capital Improvement Program City of Fort Lauderdale, FL 234 Fiscal Year 2012
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE

2012-2016 CIP PLAN

FIVE YEAR PLAN - GENERAL GOVERNMENT

Available

Balance 5 Year

2/1/11 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total

Business Enterprises

Aquatic Complex Competition Pool $ - - 300,000 - - - 300,000

Bahia Mar Dredging - - 797,125 - - - 797,125

Electrical Improvements New River 82,774 - - 350,000 350,000 514,226 1,214,226

Floating Docks - Aquatic Complex - - - - - 375,000 375,000

Las Olas Marina - Electrical Upgrade 13,439 - - 255,561 - - 255,561

Las Olas Marina - Floating Dock Replacement - - 56,200 147,500 - - 203,700

Las Olas Marina & Aquatics Complex Dredging - - 695,495 - - - 695,495

Las Olas Marina Roof Replacement 1,000 170,600 - - - 170,600

Marine Facilities Improvements Cooley's Landing 283,203 70,000 - - - 70,000

New River Boat Crossing at Kinney Tunnel - - 700,000 - - - 700,000

New River Pumpout Facilities - - 745,560 - - - 745,560

Pump Out Station on South New River 230,000 - - 57,500 - - 57,500

Riverwalk Seawall Replacement Northside - - 1,329,792 - - - 1,329,792

War Memorial Back Parking Lot Resurfacing - - 175,000 - - - 175,000

War Memorial Main Roof Replacement - - 572,000 - - - 572,000

War Memorial Stage Electric and Stage Rigging Repl - - 643,500 643,500 - - 1,287,000

Total Business Enterprises $ 610,416 - 6,255,272 1,454,061 350,000 889,226 8,948,559

Economic Development

Aquatic Center $ - 25,000,000 - - - - 25,000,000

Almond Avenue Streetscape - 130,000 - 2,470,000 - - 2,600,000

Beach Wall Decorative Lighting System - 279,000 - - - - 279,000

Broward Center of the Performing Arts (PACA) Plan - 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,500,000

Channel Square - 200,000 - 3,850,000 - - 4,050,000

City View Improvements @ NW 2 St - - - - 50,000 - 50,000

Intracoastal Promenade (Perimeter Promenade Only) - 246,500 - 4,753,500 - - 5,000,000

Las Olas Beach Plaza - 30,000 - 570,000 - - 600,000

Northwest 7th/9th Avenue Connector 16,787 - 8,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 - 24,000,000

Oceanside Plaza - 450,000 - 8,750,000 - - 9,200,000

Sebastian St./Alhambra St. Site - 300,000 - 5,650,000 - - 5,950,000

SR A1A Beachfront Promenade - 75,000 - 1,425,000 - - 1,500,000

SR A1A Streetscape Improvements (Westside) - 246,500 - 4,753,500 - - 5,000,000

Total Economic Development $ 16,787 27,257,000 8,300,000 40,522,000 8,350,000 300,000 84,729,000

Fire-Rescue

Fire Rescue - EOC - Communications Center $ - - 1,401,304 - - - 1,401,304

Fire Rescue - EOC Renovation - - 200,200 - - - 200,200

Fire Rescue - Ocean Rescue Headquarters - - 1,430,000 - - - 1,430,000

Fire Rescue - Singer Building Renovation - - - 572,000 - - 572,000

Fire Rescue - Training Facility/Tower - - - 1,500,000 - - 1,500,000

Fire Station 46 Conversion - - 286,000 - - - 286,000

Fire-Rescue Admin - FS 2 - A/C & Heating System - - - 139,000 - - 139,000

Fire-Rescue Support Services/Logistics Facility - - - 1,144,000 - - 1,144,000

Total Fire-Rescue $ - - 3,317,504 3,355,000 - - 6,672,504

Information Systems $

Off-Site Data Center - - 650,000 700,000 - - 1,350,000

Refurbish Radio Tower - - 150,000 - - - 150,000

Total Information Systems $ - - 800,000 700,000 - - 1,500,000

Parks & Recreation

Awning Structures City-Wide Playgrounds $ - - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 200,000

Bass Park Pool Building 154,000 - 1,600,000 - - - 1,600,000

Beach Community Center Floor Replacement - 54,000 - - - - 54,000

Bill Keith Preserve: Shoreline/Rip-Rap Portion 86,298 191,650 - - - - 191,650

Carter Park Renovations 55,000 - 50,000 - - - 50,000

Carter Park Senior Center - - 1,250,000 - - - 1,250,000

City-Wide Playground Replacements - - 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 680,000

City-Wide Tennis Court Improvements - - 356,070 - - - 356,070

Civic Peoples Park Memorial Wall - - 75,000 - - - 75,000

Croissant Park Ball Field Renovations - - 750,000 - - - 750,000

Degraffenreidt Community Center/Bass Park - - - 1,750,000 1,400,000 - 3,150,000

Fitness Facility & Offices in Holiday Park - - - 500,000 3,075,000 - 3,575,000

Floyd Hull Park - - 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,200,000

Floyd Hull Park Restrooms - - 50,000 - - - 50,000

George English Park Improvements $ 44,713 - 135,000 - - - 135,000

 ************************************* 5 YEAR PLAN ***********************************

Capital Improvement Program City of Fort Lauderdale, FL 235 Fiscal Year 2012
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE

2012-2016 CIP PLAN

FIVE YEAR PLAN - GENERAL GOVERNMENT

Available

Balance 5 Year

2/1/11 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total

 ************************************* 5 YEAR PLAN ***********************************

Gore Betz Park 8,770 50,000 400,000 - - - 450,000

Holiday Park Improvements - 65,000 585,000 - - - 650,000

Holiday Park Racquetball Courts - - 658,000 - - - 658,000

Hortt Park 11,235 - 270,000 - - - 270,000

Jimmy Evert Tennis Court Renovations - 100,000 356,000 - 100,000 - 556,000

Mills Pond Park Improvements - - 500,600 - - - 500,600

Mills Pond Parking, Lake Side & Rugby Field Lights - - 125,000 300,000 75,000 - 500,000

Osswald Fencing, Security & Golf Course Lights - 100,000 558,000 - - - 658,000

Osswald Park/Merritt Community Center - - 90,000 - - - 90,000

Payroll System Parks & Recreation - - 80,000 - - - 80,000

Pool Equipment Replacements 125,000 - 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 500,000

Property Purchase Waverly Road - - 500,000 - - - 500,000

Riverland Multipurpose Field Lighting - - 486,500 - - - 486,500

Riverland Park Senior Citizens Center - - 1,500,000 - - - 1,500,000

Riverwalk Improvements 234,428 - 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 600,000

Riverwalk South Pavilion - - - 365,000 - - 365,000

Snyder Park Improvements - - 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,200,000

Warbler Wetlands 300,787 - 350,000 - - - 350,000

Warfield Park Lighting - - 475,700 - - - 475,700

Water Spray Park at Holiday Park - - 300,000 - - - 300,000

Total Parks & Recreation $ 1,020,231 560,650 12,595,870 4,010,000 5,745,000 1,095,000 24,006,520

Planning

Riverwalk District Plan - Stranahan Landing/Smoker Park $ - - - 275,000 - - 275,000

Riverwalk District Plan - Overall Landscaping - - 124,000 50,000 771,000 50,000 995,000

Andrews Avenue Streetscape Improvements - - - 10,400,000 - - 10,400,000

Broward Boulevard Streetscape Improvements - - - - 5,200,000 - 5,200,000

NE/SE 3 Avenue Streetscape Improvements - - - - - 11,600,000 11,600,000

Riverwalk District Plan - Esplanade Park - - 183,000 - - 845,000 1,028,000

Riverwalk District Plan - Huizenga Plaza & Andrews - - 97,000 400,000 904,000 - 1,401,000

SE/SW 6 St Streetscape Improvements - - - - 3,000,000 - 3,000,000

Total Planning $ - - 404,000 11,125,000 9,875,000 12,495,000 33,899,000

Police

Police New AC (To Include Computer Rooms) $ - - 357,500 214,500 477,500 - 1,049,500

Public Safety Voice & Data Communications System - - 5,500,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 4,000,000 20,500,000

Police Security Camera System - - 60,000 96,000 - - 156,000

Police Jail Roof Replacement - - 350,000 - - - 350,000

Police Headquarters Elevator Replacements - - 250,000 250,000 - - 500,000

Police Conversion of Evidence Narcotics Warehouse - - - 75,000 - - 75,000

Police Conversion of Evidence Warehouse To Offices - - 103,500 - - - 103,500

Police Records Workspace Reorganization - - 100,000 - - - 100,000

Police Gun Range - - - - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000

Police Headquarters Replacement - - 3,000,000 30,000,000 45,000,000 - 78,000,000

Police Mesh Mobile Data Network 101,004 - 750,000 750,000 - - 1,500,000

Police Conversion of Current Swat Armory - - 77,000 - - - 77,000

Police Email Archive & Retrieval System - - - 173,926 - - 173,926

Police Interior Improvements to Evidence Warehouse - - 60,000 - - - 60,000

Police Records Unit Document Imaging Project - - 208,000 208,000 410,000 - 826,000

Total Police $ 101,004 - 10,816,000 37,267,426 52,387,500 4,000,000 104,470,926

Public Works

ADA - Right Of Way/Facilities $ 25,865 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 3,000,000

ADA Compliance Improvements - Non Decree 3,724 - 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 1,600,000

ADA Settlement - General Fund 3,741,466 200,000 500,000 - - - 700,000

Annual Asphalt Concrete Resurfacing - - 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 2,600,000

Annual Asphalt Concrete Resurfacing 740,000 740,000 740,000 740,000 740,000 740,000 3,700,000

Annual Marine Facilities, Seawall and Mooring Buoy 280,000 - 284,000 284,000 284,000 284,000 1,136,000

Annual Navigational Sign Repairs 100,000 - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 200,000

Annual Roof Repairs 825,000 - 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 1,600,000

Annual Speed Humps 107,990 - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000

Beach Masterplan-Phase I - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 4,000,000

Beach Wall Decorative Lighting System - - 429,000 - - - 429,000

Bridge Painting - - 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 560,000

Bridge Reconstruction Easements & Utility Relocs - 250,000 250,000 - - - 500,000

Bridge Repairs at Several Locations $ - 100,000 852,000 852,000 6,532,000 - 8,336,000

Bridge Replacement at E. Las Olas Boulevard - - - - 3,659,183 - 3,659,183

Capital Improvement Program City of Fort Lauderdale, FL 236 Fiscal Year 2012
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE

2012-2016 CIP PLAN

FIVE YEAR PLAN - GENERAL GOVERNMENT

Available

Balance 5 Year

2/1/11 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total

 ************************************* 5 YEAR PLAN ***********************************

Bridge Replacement at Laguna Terrace - - - - 2,430,000 - 2,430,000

Bridge Replacement at NE 41 Street - - - - 972,000 - 972,000

Bridge Replacement at NE 42 Street - - - - 972,000 - 972,000

Bridge Replacement at SE 15th Avenue 16,990 - 1,644,557 - - - 1,644,557

Bridge Replacement at South Ocean Drive - - - - 2,214,000 - 2,214,000

Bridge Replacement at The Harborage #865778 712,558 - 27,000 - - - 27,000

Bridge Replacement at West Lake Drive/Lake Lucille - - - - 3,985,200 - 3,985,200

Bridge Replacement at West Lake Drive/Mercedes Riv - - - - 2,916,000 - 2,916,000

Business Capital Improvement Program 170,817 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000

Capital Maintenance Facilities 350,000 - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000

City Hall Exterior Paint - - 750,000 - - - 750,000

City Wide Security Upgrades - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000

Concrete & Paver Maintenance - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000

Covered Walkway Structure - City Hall - - 250,000 - - - 250,000

Downtown St.Scapes Including Andrews & 3rd Avenues - - - - 9,652,500 - 9,652,500

Downtown Transit Connector- The Wave - 10,000,000 93,792,000 9,592,000 - - 113,384,000

Dredging Recap 1,247,759 - 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,000,000

Engr - Street Lights 475,400 - 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 600,000

FEC RR Crossing - Various Locations Maintenance 259,364 - 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 680,000

Flagler Drive Greenway 93 - 1,778,163 - - - 1,778,163

Galt Ocean Sidewalk Improvements - - 695,000 - - - 695,000

General Services Building Renovations - SW 14 Ave 200,000 - 300,000 - - - 300,000

Kinney Tunnel Painting - - 350,000 - - - 350,000

Las Olas Transportation Plan Implementation - 100,000 1,850,000 1,850,000 670,000 - 4,470,000

Marshal's Point Bridge Noise Mitigation - 152,000 - - - - 152,000

Middle River Terrace Dixie Highway Streetscape Imp - - - 142,000 - - 142,000

NE 15 Ave - Median (NE 13 St - Sunrise Blvd.) - - 292,000 - - - 292,000

Neighborhood Capital Improvements 572,441 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000

New City Hall - - - - - 72,000,000 72,000,000

Pavement Management Software System and Inspection - - - - - 125,000 125,000

Pedestrian Stairway at SW 4 Ave (Marshall) Bridge - - 500,000 - - - 500,000

Public Works Operations Center - - - - - 31,031,000 31,031,000

PW Compound Electrical Distribution Panel - - 90,000 - - - 90,000

Rehabilitate Riverhouse - - 1,275,000 - - - 1,275,000

Remediate and Renovate 6th Floor City Hall 227,526 - 772,474 - - - 772,474

Remodel 301 Building - - 5,288,136 - - - 5,288,136

Riviera Isles Street Improvements 16,904 - - 4,410,000 - - 4,410,000

South Middle River Right of Way Improvements - 100,000 650,000 - - - 750,000

Sunrise Boulevard Beautification - - 2,860,000 - - - 2,860,000

Top of the Tunnel North Extension and Public Space - 100,000 6,900,000 - - - 7,000,000

Transportation Enhancement Projects 1,140 - 200,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000

Vehicle Write Up Building Renovations - SW 14th Av - - 52,000 - - - 52,000

Total Public Works $ 10,075,037 12,442,000 128,581,330 23,180,000 40,336,883 109,490,000 314,030,213

Total General Government Projects $ 11,823,475 40,259,650 171,069,976 121,613,487 117,044,383 128,269,226 578,256,722

Capital Improvement Program City of Fort Lauderdale, FL 237 Fiscal Year 2012
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE

2012-2016 CIP PLAN

FIVE-YEAR PLAN - ENTERPRISE FUNDS

Available

Balance 5 Year

2/1/11 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total

Airport

Airfield Access and Security Improvements $ - - 60,000 315,000 2,925,000 - 3,300,000

Airfield Lighting Rehabilitation - - - 80,000 320,000 - 400,000

Airfield Pavement Maintenance Program - - - - 100,000 400,000 500,000

Airport Airfield Infrastructure Improvements 792,950 200,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 1,800,000

Blast Fence @ Foxtrot (East) - - - - 70,000 280,000 350,000

Construct Airport Security Annex 451,500 20,000 - - - - 20,000

Construct Eastern Perimeter Road - - - - 50,000 500,000 550,000

Design & Construct Acute Angle Taxiways (N&D) - - - - - 10,000 10,000

Design & Construct Relocation Of T/W Golf-Phase II - - - - 6,250 283,750 290,000

Design & Construct T/W Echo Extension - 6,250 311,250 2,632,500 - - 2,950,000

Design & Construct Customs Building/Apron 141,265 3,430,000 - - - - 3,430,000

Executive Airport Facilities Improvement 100,000 25,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 225,000

Executive Airport Land Banking Program 1,559,142 50,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 850,000

Executive Airport Landscaping Program - 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000

Helistop Infrastructure Recapitalization 201,601 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 450,000

Master Plan Update - - - 100,000 400,000 - 500,000

Mid-Field Taxiway Extension and Run-Up Area - - - 73,000 528,550 1,182,750 1,784,300

Noise Program Enhancements 601,780 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000

R/W 26,13-31 By-Pass Taxiways - 221,250 885,000 - - - 1,106,250

Relocation of T/W Golf-Phase I 61,575 - 1,121,250 - - - 1,121,250

Taxilane Charlie Pavement & Lighting Rehab - 244,090 - - - - 244,090

Taxiway C & D Pavement Rehabilitation 2,886,210 280,000 - - - - 280,000

Taxiway Echo Pavement Rehabilitation - 386,875 1,825,000 1,779,375 - - 3,991,250

Taxiway Foxtrot Pavement Rehabilitation - - - 8,750 393,125 2,075,000 2,476,875

Taxiway Pavement Striping - - - 36,000 144,000 - 180,000

Taxiway Sierra Pavement Rehabilitation - - 300,000 1,200,000 - - 1,500,000

Total Airport $ 6,796,023 4,963,465 5,302,500 7,024,625 5,736,925 5,531,500 28,559,015

Central Services

Purchase of 4-Color Digital Press $ - - 100,000 - - - 100,000

Total Central Services $ - - 100,000 - - - 100,000

Fleet

Fleet Maintenance & Repair Garage Facility, Fuel $ - - 4,625,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 10,625,000

Total Fleet $ - - 4,625,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 10,625,000

Parking

Oceanside Plaza $ - - 900,000 17,200,000 130,000 - 18,230,000

Parking- Right Of Way Improvements and Metering 690,000 345,000 345,000 345,000 345,000 345,000 1,725,000

Sebastian St./Alhambra St. Site - - 800,000 15,650,000 130,000 - 16,580,000

Total Parking $ 690,000 345,000 2,045,000 33,195,000 605,000 345,000 36,535,000

Region

Regional R & R $ 1,119,564 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 9,000,000

Total Region $ 1,119,564 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 9,000,000

Stormwater

Hendricks Isles Drainage Improvements $ - - 675,000 - - - 675,000

Total Stormwater $ - - 675,000 - - - 675,000

Water And Sewer

Annual Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation $ 298,242 350,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,350,000

Annual Water Services Replacement - 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,250,000

Broward Blvd - Large Water Main Improvements - - - 6,700,000 - - 6,700,000

Distribution & Collection R&R 1,207,039 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 2,000,000

Dixie Wellfield - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 365,000 565,000

Dixie Wellfield Raw Water Main Replacement - 4,000,000 - - - - 4,000,000

Flagler Heights - Small Watermain Improvements - - 1,988,000 - - - 1,988,000

Imperial Point Package 2 - Large Watermain Improvements - - 3,000,000 - - - 3,000,000

IT Special Projects/R&R 384,593 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000

Las Olas Blvd Large Watermain Improvements - 3,300,000 - - - - 3,300,000

NE 16 Ave Large Water Main Improvements - - - 3,300,000 - - 3,300,000

NE 4th St - Large Water Main Improvements - - 3,530,000 - - - 3,530,000

Oakland Park Blvd Water Main - 2,000,000 - - - - 2,000,000

 ************************************* 5 YEAR PLAN ***********************************

Capital Improvement Program City of Fort Lauderdale, FL 238 Fiscal Year 2012
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE

2012-2016 CIP PLAN

FIVE-YEAR PLAN - ENTERPRISE FUNDS

Available

Balance 5 Year

2/1/11 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total

 ************************************* 5 YEAR PLAN ***********************************

Peele Dixie Renewal and Replacement Projects $ - 130,000 80,000 80,000 1,713,000 1,270,000 3,273,000

Peele-Dixie additional Water Supply Construction - 1,000,000 - - - - 1,000,000

Poinciana Park (North) - Large Water Main - - - 2,400,000 - - 2,400,000

Sanitary Sewer Collection System Rehab Basin B-13 - - 1,350,000 - - - 1,350,000

Sanitary Sewer Collection System Rehab Basin B-2 - - - 1,350,000 - - 1,350,000

Sanitary Sewer Collection System Rehab-Basin A-18 - 1,250,000 - - - - 1,250,000

Sanitary Sewer Collection System Rehab-Basin A-7 - 2,000,000 - - - - 2,000,000

Sanitary Sewer Collection System Rehab-Basin B-6 - 1,350,000 - - - - 1,350,000

Seabreeze Blvd - Large Water Main Replacement - - - 4,100,000 - - 4,100,000

Shady Banks Small Water Main Improvements - 1,240,000 - - - - 1,240,000

Sistrunk Blvd/NE 6th St & NE 7 Ave Large - Water Main - - - 6,600,000 - - 6,600,000

Small Water Main Replacement - 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000

SW 31st Ave - Large Water Main Improvement - - - 3,300,000 - - 3,300,000

Water Treatment Plant Repair and Replacement - 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 2,000,000

Total Water And Sewer $ 1,889,874 18,420,000 12,248,000 30,130,000 4,013,000 3,885,000 68,696,000

Total Enterprise Fund Projects $ 10,495,461 25,528,465 26,795,500 75,149,625 15,154,925 11,561,500 154,190,015

Capital Improvement Program City of Fort Lauderdale, FL 239 Fiscal Year 2012
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE

2012-2016 CIP PLAN

FIVE-YEAR APPROPRIATIONS BY FUND 

Available

Balance 5 Year

2/1/11 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total

General Government

Business Enterprises $ 610,416 - 6,255,272 1,454,061 350,000 889,226 8,948,559

Economic Development 16,787 27,257,000 8,300,000 40,522,000 8,350,000 300,000 84,729,000

Fire Bonds - - 3,317,504 3,355,000 - - 6,672,504

Information Systems - - 800,000 700,000 - - 1,500,000

Parks & Recreation 1,020,231 560,650 12,595,870 4,010,000 5,745,000 1,095,000 24,006,520

Planning - - 404,000 11,125,000 9,875,000 12,495,000 33,899,000

Police 101,004 - 10,816,000 37,267,426 52,387,500 4,000,000 104,470,926

Public Works 10,075,037 12,442,000 128,581,330 23,180,000 40,336,883 109,490,000 314,030,213

Total General Government $ 11,823,475 40,259,650 171,069,976 121,613,487 117,044,383 128,269,226 578,256,722

Enterprise Funds

Airport $ 6,796,023 4,963,465 5,302,500 7,024,625 5,736,925 5,531,500 28,559,015

Central Services - - 100,000 - - - 100,000

Fleet - - 4,625,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 10,625,000

Parking 690,000 345,000 2,045,000 33,195,000 605,000 345,000 36,535,000

Region 1,119,564 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 9,000,000

Stormwater - - 675,000 - - - 675,000

Water and Sewer 1,889,874 18,420,000 12,248,000 30,130,000 4,013,000 3,885,000 68,696,000

Total Enterprise Funds $ 10,495,461 25,528,465 26,795,500 75,149,625 15,154,925 11,561,500 154,190,015

Total Cip Projects $ 22,318,936 65,788,115 197,865,476 196,763,112 132,199,308 139,830,726 732,446,737

 ************************************* 5 YEAR PLAN ***********************************

Capital Improvement Program City of Fort Lauderdale, FL 240 Fiscal Year 2012
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE

2012-2016 CIP PLAN

SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL SOURCES

Pending 5 Year

FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total

Funding Uses-All Funds

Projects $ 22,318,936 65,788,115 197,865,476 196,763,112 132,199,308 139,830,726 732,446,737

POTENTIAL FINANCING SOURCES

Transfers In:

 General Fund $ - - - - - - -

 Carry Forward 22,318,936 - - - - - -

 General Cap. Projects Fund Bal. - 2,262,650 - - - - 2,262,650

CIP Appropriations

 Airport $ - 2,864,375 (12,356,470) (5,023,625) (1,337,325) 1,381,500 (14,471,545)

 Airport Grants - 2,099,090 17,658,970 12,048,250 7,074,250 4,150,000 43,030,560

 CDBG - 300,000 - - - - 300,000

 CRA - 27,257,000 8,300,000 40,522,000 8,350,000 300,000 84,729,000

 Gas Tax - 740,000 740,000 740,000 740,000 740,000 3,700,000

 Other Funding* - 9,700,000 167,429,976 83,351,487 110,954,383 127,229,226 498,665,072

 Parking - 345,000 345,000 345,000 345,000 345,000 1,725,000

 Parking Revenue Bonds - - 1,700,000 32,850,000 260,000 - 34,810,000

 Regional R & R - 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 9,000,000

 Water & Sewer - 18,420,000 12,248,000 30,130,000 4,013,000 3,885,000 68,696,000

Total Funding Sources-All Funds $ 22,318,936 65,788,115 197,865,476 196,763,112 132,199,308 139,830,726 732,446,737

 ***************************************** 5 YEAR PLAN ******************************************

Capital Improvement Program City of Fort Lauderdale, FL 241 Fiscal Year 2012
This page intentionally left blank. 

Capital Improvement Program City of Fort Lauderdale, FL 242 Fiscal Year 2012
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

Broward MPO 

2035 Long Range 

Transportation 

Plan 

Update 

Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

Prepared by: 

In association with: 

December 2009
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

 TABLE OF CONTENTS 

1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 

 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 1 

 1.2 Methodology and Changes From the Previous Plan ........................................................ 1 

 1.3 Limitations of the Analysis ................................................................................................. 2 

 1.4 Policy Statement ................................................................................................................ 2 

2.0 Federal Funding ....................................................................................................................... 3 

 2.1 Federal Trust Fund Revenues and SAFETEA-LU Programs.............................................. 3 

 2.2 Federal Highway Administration Programs ...................................................................... 5 

 2.3 Federal Transit Administration Programs ......................................................................... 6 

 2.4 State of Florida Department of Transportation Funding ................................................. 7 

 2.5 State Program Revenue Estimates ................................................................................... 7 

 2.6 State Program Descriptions and Project Eligibility ......................................................... 10 

 2.7 State and Federal New Starts Funding ........................................................................... 12 

 2.8 Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise .......................................................................................... 13 

3.0 Dedicated Gas Taxes and Transportation Concurrency Fees ............................................ 16 

 3.1 State Motor Fuel Taxes Distributed to the County ......................................................... 16 

 3.2 Locally Imposed Gas Taxes.............................................................................................. 17 

 3.3 Gas Tax Revenues ............................................................................................................ 18 

 3.4 Transportation Concurrency Fees ................................................................................... 18

4.0 Agency Revenues .................................................................................................................. 20 

 4.1 Broward County Transit .................................................................................................... 20 

 4.2 Tri-Rail/SFRTA ................................................................................................................... 21 

 4.3 Broward County Port Everglades Department ................................................................ 22 

 4.4 Broward County Aviation Department ............................................................................. 23 

5.0 Summary of Forecast Revenues .......................................................................................... 24 

LIST OF EXHIBITS 

Exhibit 1: Authorized Federal Funding Levels .............................................................................. 4

Exhibit 2: Projected Total State Revenues ................................................................................... 7

Exhibit 3: FDOT Transportation Programs .................................................................................... 8

Exhibit 4: FDOT Program Funding Estimates for Broward County ............................................... 9

Exhibit 5: Estimated Federal/State New Starts Funding ............................................................. 13

Exhibit 6: Turnpike Expansion Projects in Broward County ........................................................ 14

Exhibit 7: Turnpike Revenues Available for Capital FY 2015-2035 ............................................ 15

Exhibit 8: Projected Gas Tax Revenues in Broward County ....................................................... 18

Exhibit 9: Projected Transportation Concurrency Fees in Broward County ................................ 19

Exhibit 10: Broward County Transit Forecast Revenues ............................................................ 21

Exhibit 11: Summary of Projected Baseline Revenues (YOE dollars) for Broward County ........ 24

Exhibit 12: Summary of Projected Baseline Revenues (2009 dollars) for Broward County ........ 24

 
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

1 

1.0 Introduction 

 

1.1 Purpose 

The Broward Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is developing a Long Range 

Transportation Plan (LRTP) for a 2035 horizon year. This 2035 LRTP will demonstrate the 

MPO’s plans for future capital investment in transportation infrastructure as well as ongoing 

operating and maintenance expenses for the Broward metropolitan planning area, i.e., 

Broward County. This memorandum on revenue forecasting assumptions is an important 

component of the overall LRTP, as it provides a review of the financial resources that are 

projected to be available to the Broward metropolitan area through 2035. The identification 

of these resources will then be used to prioritize future highway and transit investments in a 

‘constrained’ scenario which is limited to existing and reasonably likely funding sources. In 

addition, the review will discuss potential new funding sources which could be used to fund 

additional transportation investments in an ‘unconstrained’ scenario. It is important to note, 

however, that some of the revenues identified in this review – specifically, revenues for 

Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise – are programmed by their respective agencies, and thus 

these funds are not available to be prioritized by the MPO for use on identified 

transportation needs in the county. 

The principal federal, state, and local funding programs which support transportation 

investment in Broward County are reviewed and forecasted through 2035 in this 

memorandum. This review includes information on: 

• Federal funding programs for both highways and public transportation 

• State of Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) funding programs and revenue 

estimates 

• Gas tax revenues and transportation concurrency fees 

• Local agency revenues, specifically for Broward County Transit (BCT) 

1.2 Methodology and Changes From the Previous Plan 

The most significant change in methodology from the prior LRTP relates to the treatment of 

inflation. Federal planning regulations which were adopted in 2007 and corresponding MPO 

Advisory Council (MPOAC) guidelines now require that both cost and revenue forecasts be 

presented in year-of-expenditure (YOE) dollars, rather than in base year dollars as had been 

the standard approach previously. FDOT revenue forecasts are now given in YOE dollars, and 

FDOT provides inflation forecasts which can be used to estimate YOE project costs. 

Aside from this significant change, the overall approach is similar to that in the previous 

plan. FDOT’s guidelines for estimating and presenting future revenues are followed in this 

review, as laid out in the 2035 Revenue Forecast Handbook and subsequent supplements, 

revisions, and workshops. FDOT currently provides its revenue forecasts for the period 2014 

through 2018 as the “2nd Five Years Plan” and then the period 2019 through 2035 as the 

“2035 Cost Feasible Plan.” The updated 2009-2013 Transportation Improvement Program 

(TIP) is used for near-term revenue forecasts prior to the “2nd Five Years Plan.” Funding in 

the “2035 Cost Feasible Plan” is provided for 2019 and 2020 and then in five-year 

aggregates for the periods 2021 to 2025, 2026 to 2030, and 2031 to 2035. 
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

2 

Revenue growth rates for key local revenue sources – including gas taxes, concurrency fees, 

and ad valorem (property) taxes – were developed in consultation with MPO staff. 

1.3 Limitations of the Analysis 

This analysis describes only State FDOT revenues forecasted to flow to Broward County for 

capital improvement purposes – that is, for the State Capacity Program. The review does not 

include FDOT operating and maintenance funds (i.e., the State Non-Capacity Program) that 

would be applied to facilities in Broward County. FDOT implements the Non-Capacity 

Program throughout the state and does not provide district-level revenue estimates for the 

Non-Capacity Program. According to FDOT, the Department has estimated sufficient 

revenues to meet the Non-Capacity safety, preservation, and support objectives in each 

metropolitan area in the state. 

1.4 Policy Statement 

As is true for most metropolitan areas in the state, Broward MPO is facing a very challenging 

environment for long-range planning. The challenges include: 

• Major cost increases in recent years for projects that were programmed in previous 

Plans, due to substantial increases in costs for right-of-way, labor, and key 

commodities such as steel and concrete. 

• A deep and sustained recession across the nation, with Florida being particularly 

hard-hit, and all transportation funding sources – gas taxes, property taxes, sales 

taxes, tolls, rental car taxes, and more – experiencing major declines from previously 

projected levels. 

• Volatility in petroleum prices causing significant changes in transit ridership, vehicle 

miles traveled (VMT), gas tax revenues, and other key travel indicators, making 

estimation of future travel patterns difficult. 

• The potential for substantial long-term changes in federal transportation policy and 

funding following the reauthorization of the SAFETEA-LU. 

In short, the past five years have been challenging for Broward MPO and its planned 

transportation investments, and the constrained 2035 Plan will reflect this difficulty. Based 

on the revenues projected in this review, many worthwhile projects will not be included in 

the constrained Plan and will be deferred to the unfunded project list. However, the 

examination of potential new funding sources can also serve as an important policy 

statement for the MPO about its transportation future. 

 
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

3 

2.0 Federal Funding 

This section describes the federal revenue sources (i.e., the Highway Trust Fund) and federal 

funding programs whose revenues flow to Broward County, either directly or through FDOT. 

Federal revenues include both Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit 

Administration (FTA) funds, and these federal revenues may be either formula-based or 

discretionary depending on the program. 

At the time of this 2035 LRTP update, the current federal surface transportation legislation 

– the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, or 

SAFETEA-LU – is approaching its expiration and will need to be reauthorized.1 This 

reauthorization will set funding levels and specify changes in the various transportation 

funding programs. There exists the potential for major policy changes in the next iteration of 

the surface transportation legislation, although there is no consensus among observers 

about what form those changes might ultimately take. 

In addition, the Highway Trust Fund is facing insolvency (i.e., an inability to meet committed 

formula payments to states). Insolvency was averted in 2008 by an ‘emergency’ transfer of 

$8 billion from the general fund to the highway trust fund. A combination of 

stagnation/reduction in vehicle miles traveled, increased fuel-efficiency of vehicles, and no 

change in federal gas tax since 1993 (i.e., inability to keep up with cost increases) has 

created this funding crisis. The National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue 

Commission recommended an increase in the gas tax (plus indexing for inflation) as one of a 

set of policy options. However, none of this is currently known, and absent that information, 

states and MPOs must continue to refer to SAFETEA-LU for a description of funding 

programs and authorized funding levels. 

 

2.1 Federal Trust Fund Revenues and SAFETEA-LU Programs 

As noted above, the following description of federal funding sources and programs is 

prepared within the current SAFETEA-LU legislative framework. Funding programs for 

transportation may change and authorized funding levels for each program will change when 

Congress reauthorizes the transportation legislation. Presented below is a general 

description of current federal transportation funds. 

The Highway Trust Fund (HTF) was created by the Highway Revenue Act of 1956 (Pub. L. 84-

627) to ensure a dependable source of funding for the National System of Interstate and 

Defense Highways and to serve as the source of funding for the remainder of the Federal-aid 

Highway Program. Like other Federal trust funds, the HTF is a financing mechanism 

established by law to account for tax receipts that are collected by the Federal Government 

and are dedicated or "earmarked" for expenditure on special purposes. Originally, the HTF 

focused solely on highways, but later Congress determined that some revenues from the 

highway-user taxes dedicated to the HTF should be used to fund transit needs. As a result, 

the Mass Transit Account was created within the HTF effective April 1, 1983. Since that 

 

1 Congress was originally set to begin the process of reauthorization in the second half of 2009. However, it 

now appears likely that SAFETEA-LU will be extended in its current form for another 18 months, with 

reauthorization not occurring until 2011. 
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

4 

time, a portion of the revenues earmarked for the HTF has been credited specifically to the 

Mass Transit Account. 

Tax revenues directed to the HTF are derived from excise taxes on highway motor fuel and 

truck related taxes on truck tires, sales of trucks and trailers, and heavy vehicle use. The 

Mass Transit Account receives a portion of the motor fuel taxes (2.86 cents per gallon), as 

does the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund (0.1 cent per gallon). The General 

Fund receives 2.5 cents per gallon of the tax on gasohol and some other alcohol fuels plus 

an additional 0.6 cent per gallon for fuels that are at least 10 percent ethanol. The Highway 

Account receives the remaining portion of the fuel tax proceeds. For example, as of October 

1, 1997, the 18.4 cents per gallon gasoline tax was split as follows: 2.86 cents per gallon to 

the Mass Transit Account, 0.1 cent per gallon to the Leaking Underground Storage Tank 

Trust Fund, and 15.44 cents to the Highway Account. All of the receipts from the non-fuel 

taxes are deposited in the Highway Account. 

SAFETEA-LU established funding authorization levels (i.e., funding levels which may be used 

for the respective programs) and obligation limitations (i.e., a restriction on the amount of 

federal assistance that may be promised or obligated during a specific period—a given year, 

for example) for highway and transit programs for fiscal years 2005 through 2009. SAFETEALU extended the practice of establishing separate budget categories for highway and mass 

transit discretionary spending, thus establishing a budgetary "firewall" between each of 

those programs and all other discretionary programs. The firewall ensures that the protected 

highway and transit programs no longer have to compete with other domestic discretionary 

programs (e.g. housing or education) for a place in the annual federal budget. The budgetary 

firewall was instrumental in establishing “guaranteed” annual funding levels (or more 

accurately, obligation limitations) for both highway and transit programs. Any authorizations 

in excess of the guaranteed levels are in the budgetary “red zone” and remain part of the 

general discretionary budget category. Red zone funds may be made available through the 

annual budget and appropriations process and must compete with other budget priorities 

for their place in the budget each year. Exhibit 1 presents the guaranteed funding levels 

available for obligation as authorized in SAFETEA-LU and summarized by USDOT. 

Exhibit 1: Authorized Federal Funding Levels (millions of dollars)

Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total 

Guaranteed Available for Obligation 

Highway Category 

 Firewall $35,164M $37,221M $39,461M $40,824M $42,470M $195,892M

 Exempt $739M $739M $739M $739M $739M $3,6954M

 Total $35,903M $37,960M $40,199M $41,563M $43,209M $198,834M

Mass Transit Category 

 Firewall $7,646M $8,623M $8,975M $9,731M $10,338M $45,313M

TOTAL $43,550M $46,583M $49,174M $51,294M $53,547M $244,148M
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

5 

2.2 Federal Highway Administration Programs 

The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) receives federal revenues from five major 

programs (along with a number of smaller programs) and allocates the applicable funds to 

the regional MPOs through specific FDOT funding programs. FDOT’s major programs can be 

divided into two general categories: Capacity Programs and Non-Capacity Programs. 

Capacity Programs include each major FDOT program that expands the capacity of existing 

transportation systems, while Non-Capacity Programs include the remaining FDOT programs 

that are designed to support, operate, and maintain the state transportation system. MPOs 

are responsible for planning, and receive revenue estimates, only for those FDOT programs 

that are part of the Capacity Program. Thus, only those federal funding programs that are 

part of the FDOT Capacity Program are described in this review. The major FHWA federal 

funding programs, whose funds flow through the FDOT Capacity Program are: National 

Highway System Program (NHS), Surface Transportation Program (STP), and Congestion 

Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ). The other two major FHWA funding 

programs, Interstate Maintenance Program (IM) and the Highway Bridge Replacement and 

Rehabilitation Program (HBRRP), provide funds that largely flow through the FDOT’s NonCapacity Program. 

• National Highway System Program (NHS): The NHS Program provides funding for 

improvements to rural and urban roads that are part of the National Highway System, 

including the Interstate System and designated connections to major intermodal 

terminals. Under certain circumstances, NHS funds may also be used to fund transit 

improvements in NHS corridors. The federal share of project costs, under the NHS 

program, is 80 percent. If the funds are used for projects on the Interstate System, the 

federal share of project costs will be 90 percent (unless the project adds lanes that are 

not high occupancy- vehicle or auxiliary lanes, in which case the federal share will revert 

to the 80 percent level). 

 

• Surface Transportation Program (STP): The STP provides flexible funding that may be 

used by states and localities for projects on any Federal-aid highway, including the NHS, 

bridge projects on any public road, transit capital projects, and intracity and intercity bus 

terminals and facilities. A portion of funds reserved for rural areas may be spent on rural 

minor collectors. Within the STP program there exists a 10 percent set-aside of STP 

funds for safety improvement projects including railway/highway crossings and a 10 

percent set-aside for transportation enhancements. The federal share of project costs, 

under STP, is 80 percent. If the funds are used for projects on the Interstate System, the 

federal share of project costs will be 90 percent (unless the project adds lanes that are 

not high-occupancy-vehicle or auxiliary lanes, in which case the federal share will revert 

to the 80 percent level). 

 

• Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ): The primary 

purpose of the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) is to 

fund projects and programs in air quality non-attainment and maintenance areas for 

ozone, carbon monoxide (CO), and small particulate matter (PM-10) which reduce 

transportation related emissions. CMAQ funds enjoy flexible applications with respect to 

projects that meet the broad goals of the program. The funds are not available for 
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

6 

construction of new highway lanes, except HOV lanes, in non-attainment areas. The 

federal share of project costs, under the STP program, is 80 percent, unless the funds 

are used for projects on the Interstate System, in which case the federal share of project 

costs will be 90 percent. 

2.3 Federal Transit Administration Programs 

There are four primary FTA funding programs that flow directly to the MPO or the local transit 

agency. Two of the programs (Section 5307 Urbanized Area funds and Section 5309 Fixed 

Guideway Modernization funds) are formula-based, while Section 5309 Bus and BusRelated funds are generally earmarked and Section 5309 “New Starts” funds are allocated 

on a competitive basis through a multi-year application process. This section briefly 

describes each program and the pertinent project eligibility requirements. 

• Section 5307 Urbanized Area: The 5307 formula grants program provides transit capital 

and operating assistance to urbanized areas with populations of more than 50,000. 

Annual grant funds are based on various demographic, level of service, and ridership 

variables. SAFETEA-LU limits the application of these grants to capital purposes (e.g., bus 

and rail vehicle replacement and facility rehabilitation and replacement), but 

preventative maintenance expenses in the operating budget may be considered as 

“capital” for this purpose. This broad definition of “capital” expense effectively allows 

transit agencies the option of funding operations from Section 5307 funds, thereby 

providing great flexibility from this funding source. Also, SAFETEA-LU continued the 

transit enhancement program established in TEA-21 under the Section 5307 program 

where, in urbanized areas with populations of 200,000 of more, at least one percent of 

the Section 5307 funds apportioned each fiscal year shall be used for activities defined 

as transit enhancements. 

 

• Section 5309 Fixed Guideway Modernization: This program provides capital funds for 

existing fixed guideway systems, based on revenue miles and route miles of service that 

have been in operation for seven years. 

• Section 5309 Bus and Bus-Related: This discretionary program provides project-specific 

capital grants for the purchase of bus vehicles and other bus-related assets. 

• Section 5309 New Starts: Fixed guideway transit projects from across the country 

compete for capital assistance grants from FTA through the New Starts process, which is 

the country’s primary mechanism for funding major new transit capacity projects. New 

Starts is a highly competitive and time-intensive process where projects must meet 

stringent requirements for both cost-effectiveness and implementing agencies must 

show that they have the long-term financial capacity to successfully build, operate, and 

maintain the proposed project. Projects generally receive much less than the statutory 

maximum Federal participation of 80%. Broward County Transit does not currently have 

any projects in the New Starts “pipeline,” but the County does have plans to apply for 

New Starts funding for multiple major fixed guideway transit projects. If the New Starts 

applications are successful, the estimated federal share of capital costs for these 

projects is projected to be approximately 50%. 
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

7 

2.4 State of Florida Department of Transportation Funding 

This section describes the State transportation funding programs and the forecasted 

revenues developed by FDOT that are projected to flow to Broward County through the year 

2035. Revenues that are distributed by FDOT are comprised of three major funding-source 

categories: federal, state, and turnpike. The total forecasted revenues for the entire State of 

Florida over the plan period are shown in Exhibit 2. 

Exhibit 2: Projected Total State Revenues (millions of dollars) 

Source 2007-10 2011-15 2016-20 2021-25 2026-30 2031-35 29-Year 

Total 

Federal $8,208 $9,904 $10,137 $10,836 $11,417 $11,912 $62,414

 23% 26% 26% 25% 24% 23% 24%

State 22,650 24,442 25,431 28,530 31,978 35,531 168,542

 65% 65% 66% 66% 67% 68% 66%

Turnpike 4,131 3,159 3,027 4,149 4,514 4,921 23,901

 12% 8% 8% 10% 9% 9% 9%

Total $34,989 $37,485 $38,594 $43,514 $47,910 $52,365 $254,857 

 (Source: FDOT 2035 Revenue Forecast Handbook, May 2008, Table 1, page 6) 

2.5 State Program Revenue Estimates 

Beginning in 2008, FDOT prepared long-range revenue projections for the state’s major 

funding categories based upon the state’s Adopted Work Program, current federal and state 

legislation, forecasts of federal funding, and internal FDOT policies. Due to the severe 

economic downturn nationally and in Florida, these projections continue to change and have 

been revised downward more than once from their initial estimates. As the recession 

continues, the state’s revenue estimates may continue to change, but this review presents 

the most current available estimates from FDOT. 

FDOT combines the Department’s major programs into two general categories: Capacity 

Programs and Non-Capacity Programs. 

• Capacity Programs include each major FDOT program that expands the capacity of 

existing transportation systems. 

• Non-Capacity Programs include the remaining FDOT programs that are designed to 

support, operate and maintain the state transportation system. FDOT, based upon 

input from local MPOs, takes the lead in developing and administering a statewide 

Non-Capacity Program. According to FDOT, the Department has estimated sufficient 

revenues to meet safety, preservation and support objectives through 2035 

throughout the state, including each metropolitan area. It is not necessary for MPOs 

to identify projects for these programs, so revenue estimates for these activities have 

not been developed for metropolitan areas. 

• Accordingly, with regard to state programs and state funding, MPOs need only 

identify projects that are funded through state Capacity Programs. 
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

8 

The major elements of the Capacity and Non-Capacity Programs and eligible projects are 

detailed in Exhibit 3, taken from the current 2035 Revenue Forecast Handbook. 

Exhibit 3: FDOT Transportation Programs 

 (Source: FDOT 2035 Revenue Forecast Handbook, May 2008, Table 2, page 8)
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

9 

Exhibit 4 summarizes FDOT’s current revenue forecasts for its major program areas for 

Broward County. 

Exhibit 4: FDOT Program Funding Estimates for Broward County (millions of dollars) 

FY 15

Subtotal

FYs 16‐20

Subtotal

FYs 21‐25

Subtotal

FYs 26‐30

Subtotal

FYs 31‐35

Subtotal

21‐Year

Total

SIS Highways/FIHS Construction/ROW $97 $639 $63 $0 $0 $799

"Mega‐Projects" (uncertain timing) $3,304

Other Arterial Construction/ROW ‐ Capacity Program $44 267.8 299.9 321.8 350 $1,284

Other Arterial Construction/ROW ‐ Product Support1 $9 $54 $60 $64 $70 $257

Transit2 $26 $138 $156 $174 $190 $683

TMA $34 $178 $187 $193 $194 $785

TOTAL FORECASTED FDOT REVENUES $209 $1,276 $766 $753 $804 $7,111

County Share of District TRIP Funds ‐ Illustrative Only 3 $13 $56 $54 $54 $54 $230

1 ‐ Product support for planning/engineering is estimated as 20% of Other Arterial/ROW.

2 ‐ In final summary of revenues, some FDOT Transit funds are eliminated to avoid double‐counting with BCT projected revenues.

3 ‐ TRIP funding illustrative due to uncertainty of amount going to Broward County and to SEFTC's role as decision‐maker.

 (Sources: FDOT 2035 Revenue Forecast Handbook Supplement for Broward County; 

 FDOT SIS/FIHS Second Five Years and Cost Feasible Plan) 

In the 2035 Revenue Forecast Handbook, FDOT offers the following guidance for planning 

for the use of TMA funds: 

The estimates of TMA Funds developed from the analysis should be added to 

the amounts provided by FDOT for the appropriate Capacity Program (Other 

Arterials Construction & ROW, Transit, etc.) for each time period. Estimates of 

TMA Funds for non-Capacity Programs (Product Support, Resurfacing, etc.) 

should be documented, but should not be added to estimates of Non-Capacity 

Program funds provided by FDOT because those estimates are statewide 

estimates. 

FDOT also notes that all TMA funds may be used on “off-system” roads. The TMA funds are 

presented here as a separate line-item, but they are added to the other capacity program 

areas (as described above) when creating the cost-feasible plan. 

Also, as described in the footnote to Exhibit 4, FDOT’s Transportation Regional Incentive 

Program (TRIP) funds are shown as illustrative only, meaning they are not being used in the 

determination of the 2035 cost feasible plan. This is done for two reasons. First, FDOT 

estimates TRIP funds only at the District level and not at the County level. Therefore, the 

share of the projected District Four TRIP funds that will actually be allocated to Broward 

County is not known. An estimate of 50% has been used in the illustrative calculation above, 

based on population and past experience. The second reason is that the Broward MPO is 

not the “decision-maker” with respect to choosing projects that receive TRIP funding. 

Instead, the Southeast Florida Transportation Council (SEFTC) is charged with that 

responsibility. In light of these constraints, the Broward MPO and FDOT agreed that it would 

be more prudent to show the TRIP funds as illustrative only.
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

10 

2.6 State Program Descriptions and Project Eligibility 

This section presents a brief description of each major sub-program under the State 

Capacity Program and describes what types of planned projects and programs are eligible 

for funding across the different major sub-programs. 

FDOT subdivides the state Capacity Programs into two additional areas of focus: Economic 

Competitiveness and Quality of Life goals. Planning and project identification responsibilities 

are divided between the State and the MPO across the two programs. The Economic 

Competitiveness program includes projects that help strengthen the State’s comparative 

economic position and include the following major programs: FIHS Construction/ROW, 

Aviation, Rail, Seaport, and Intermodal Access. FDOT has “taken the lead” in identification of 

planned projects and programs that support the Economic Competitiveness Goal and 

provides detailed information to MPOs. As a result, metropolitan plans and programs that 

include state and federal funds for these major programs should be coordinated and 

consistent with state long range plans and programs. MPOs have been requested to “take 

the lead” in identification of planned projects and programs for the major programs that 

support the Quality of Life Goal. These programs include: Other Arterial Construction and 

Right of Way (ROW), and Transit. The programs described below are presented under the 

subcategories of Economic Competitiveness, and Quality of Life goals. 

 

Economic Competitiveness Goals 

• FIHS Construction and Right-of-Way: As a statewide Economic Competitiveness Goal, 

FDOT “takes the lead” in identifying projects that are consistent with the FIHS 

Construction and ROW Program. The Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS) is a 

component of the State Highway System. Its primary purpose is to serve interstate 

and regional commerce and long distance trips. Metropolitan plans and programs for 

the FIHS should be consistent with the current FIHS Cost Feasible Plan, as provided 

to each MPO. Public transportation, intermodal access, and seaport development 

projects may be funded under this program, provided that they are included in the 

current FIHS Cost Feasible Plan. Capacity improvement projects eligible for funding in 

the current plan include: 

o Construction of additional lanes; 

o The capacity improvement component of interchange modifications; 

o New interchanges; 

o Exclusive lanes for through traffic, public transportation vehicles, and other 

high occupancy vehicles; 

o Bridge replacement for which the essential purpose is to provide increased 

capacity; 

o Other construction to improve traffic flow, such as intelligent transportation 

system (ITS), incident management systems, and vehicle control and 

surveillance systems; 

o The preferred alternative defined by an approved multimodal Interstate 

Master Plan; and 

o New weight and weigh-in-motion stations and rest areas.

• Rail: The state provides funding for acquisition of rail corridors and assistance in 

developing intercity passenger and commuter rail service, fixed guideway system 
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

11 

development, rehabilitation of rail facilities and high speed transportation. Projects 

and programs eligible for funding include: 

o Assistance with acquisition of rail corridors; 

o Assistance with development of fixed guideway systems; 

o Assistance with rail passenger services including all aspects of intercity, and 

commuter rail development; 

o Rehabilitation of rail branch lines where economically justified; and 

o Improvement of warning devices at public rail-highway grade crossings. 

• Intermodal Access: The state provides assistance in improving access to intermodal 

facilities and the acquiring of associated rights of way. Projects and programs eligible 

for funding include: 

o Assistance with improving access to seaports and airports, particularly 

through highway and rail improvements; and 

o Assistance with development of intermodal terminals and facilities. 

• Strategic Intermodal System: The 2003 Florida Legislature enacted Sections 339.61-

64, Florida Statutes that created the Florida Strategic Intermodal System, and 

adopted by reference the SIS Steering Committee's recommendations for designation 

criteria that established the initial statewide system of SIS hubs and corridors. The 

statutes also directed FDOT to develop a strategic plan for funding and managing the 

SIS, with input from external transportation partners. The need for a Strategic 

Intermodal System was identified by various entities with an interest in the funding of 

key transportation systems throughout the state. Among these entities were the 

Stakeholders Task Force, the Florida Chamber Foundation and the Transportation 

and Land Use Committee The Strategic Intermodal System calls for a transportation 

system that is made up of statewide and regionally significant facilities and services 

(strategic); contains all forms of transportation for moving both people and goods, 

including linkages that provide for smooth and efficient transfers between modes 

and major facilities (intermodal); and integrates individual facilities, services, forms 

of transportation (modes) and linkages into a single, integrated transportation 

network (system). 

 

Quality of Life Goals 

• Other Arterial Construction and Right of Way: The primary purpose of this major 

program is to fund improvements on State Highway System roadways, or SHS, that 

are not designated as part of the SIS or FIHS. The approximately 8,000 miles 

(statewide) of non-FIHS highways represent about 68% of the current SHS. Projects 

and programs eligible for funding include: 

o Construction and traffic operations improvements on the SHS that add 

capacity, reconstruct existing facilities, improve highway geometrics (e.g., 

curvature), provide grade separations, and improve turning movements 

through signalization improvements and adding storage capacity within turn 

lanes; 

o Acquisition of land necessary to support the SHS construction and bridge 

programs; 

o Acquisition of land in SHS corridors on an advanced basis (before 

construction is funded in the 5-year Work Program); 
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

12 

o Construction and traffic operations improvements on certain local government 

roads2 that add capacity, reconstruct existing facilities, improve highway 

geometrics (e.g., curvature), provide grade separations, and improve turning 

movements through signalization improvements and adding storage capacity 

within turn lanes; and 

o Acquisition of land necessary to support the construction program for certain 

local government roads, as discussed immediately above. 

There exists a great deal of local discretion and flexibility in how funds from the Other 

Arterial Construction and Right-of-Way program are applied. For example, all of the funds 

may be applied to transit improvements (either capital improvements or operations). If a 

District decided to use all Other Arterial Construction and Right-of-Way program funds on 

transit, they would effectively be transferring those funds to the Transit program and the 

funds would then be subject to the eligibility requirements under the Transit program. 

Conversely, all funds may be applied to roadway improvements. Use of these funds for road 

projects not on the SHS will effectively reduce the amount of funds planned for the SHS and 

public transportation in the metropolitan area, the District and the State. 

• Transit: The state provides technical and operating/capital assistance to transit, 

paratransit and ridesharing systems. Projects and programs eligible for funding 

include: 

o Capital and operating assistance to public transit systems and Community 

Transportation Coordinators, through the Public Transit Block Grant Program; 

o Service Development projects, which are special projects that can receive 

initial funding from the state; 

o Commuter assistance programs that encourage transportation demand 

management strategies, ridesharing and public/private partnerships to 

provide services and systems designed to increase vehicle occupancy; and 

o Assistance with acquisition, construction, promotion and monitoring of parkand-ride lots. 

2.7 State and Federal New Starts Funding 

FDOT has projected approximately $1.18 billion in statewide funding that will be available to 

counties and regions through the Florida New Starts Transit Program from FY 2015 through 

FY 2035. The MPO estimates that Broward County’s “share” of these funds, based on 

population and demonstrated need, is approximately 10% of the statewide total, or $118 

million. The MPO further has estimated that major transit capital projects in the County 

which successfully apply for and receive federal New Starts funding are likely to have their 

funding structured so that federal funds cover 50% of the costs, state funds cover 10% of 

the cost, and the remaining 40% of the capital costs are borne locally. Using these matching 

proportions and assuming the $118 million in state New Starts, the MPO estimates that 

slightly more than $700 million will be available in federal New Starts funding over the 

period. Of course, both the state and federal New Starts programs are discretionary, and the 

 

2 By law, state funds cannot be used on local government roads except under certain subprograms subject to 

annual legislative appropriations. FDOT has directed that long range plans should not assume that state funds 

will be appropriated for local government road improvements. 
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

13 

actual future revenues that flow to Broward County for major transit capital projects will 

depend on the total amount of discretionary funding available and on the how highly 

Broward’s proposed projects are rated against competing projects. These funding estimates 

are shown in the table in Exhibit 5. 

Exhibit 5: Estimated Federal/State New Starts Funding (millions of dollars)

FY 15

Subtotal

FYs 16‐20

Subtotal

FYs 21‐25

Subtotal

FYs 26‐30

Subtotal

FYs 31‐35

Subtotal

21‐Year

Total

Statewide New Starts Funds 75.0 $        $     291.7 $     270.9 $     270.9 $     270.9 $  1,179.4

Broward Share of Funds (providing

10% match) $         7.5 $       29.2 $       27.1 $       27.1 $       27.1 $      117.9

Implied Federal New Starts Funds

(50% match) $       37.5 $     145.9 $     135.5 $     135.5 $     135.5 $      589.7

TOTAL Broward State/Federal

New Starts Funds $       45.0 $     175.0 $     162.5 $     162.5 $     162.5 $      707.6

2035 Forecast

2.8 Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise 

Florida’s Turnpike has played a major role in meeting the transportation needs of South 

Florida since its opening in 1957. Today, the Turnpike annually serves over 400 million 

patrons, or more than one million users per day, and about half of these are in South 

Florida. In order to provide quality service in this important travel market, the Turnpike 

continues to fund major projects in South Florida. 

The Turnpike’s “net revenues” are defined as gross revenues (i.e., tolls and concessions) 

less operating and maintenance expenses. Net revenues are used for a number of projects 

such as capacity improvements (widenings and interchange improvements), safety, SunPass 

improvements, ITS development, preservation activities such as resurfacing and 

rehabilitation, and annual debt service. The Turnpike has a coordinated process in place to 

appropriate the revenues to needed transportation projects in Broward County. However, as 

with other state and local revenue sources, the recession has had a negative impact on 

Turnpike traffic and revenues. As of the writing of this plan, given the economic difficulties 

facing the state, Turnpike officials are facing great uncertainty over long-term projections of 

future revenues that will be available for capital projects. Therefore, the constrained plan 

shows only the revenues and expenses associated with those projects that are already 

included the Turnpike’s current ten-year finance plan, and there are no major capital 

improvements currently projected for the system beyond 2018. 

 
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

14 

Exhibit 6 shows the Turnpike’s projected major capital improvements in Broward County, 

which include widenings, toll plaza improvements, and interchange projects. 

Exhibit 6: Turnpike Expansion Projects in Broward County 

FPID Facility Location Project Cost 

(millions) Year

406097-1 Turnpike From: MP 59 - N of Sunrise Blvd (SB)

To: MP 66 - N of Atlantic Blv (SB) Widen to 4-lanes $108.3 UC1

406097-4 Turnpike From: MP 59 - N of Sunrise Blvd (NB)

To: MP 66 - N of Atlantic Blv (NB) Widen to 4-lanes $55.8 2010

406094-1 Turnpike From: MP 53 - Griffin Rd (SB)

To: MP 59 - N of Sunrise Blvd (SB) Widen to 4-lanes+ $103.1 UC

406094-4 Turnpike From: MP 57 - Peters Rd (NB)

To: MP 59 - N of Sunrise Blvd (NB) Widen to 4-lanes+ $30.3 2009

420809-3 Turnpike MP 53-54 & Interstate 595 Interchange Modification +

Aux. Lanes $157.9 2013

417547-1 HEFT MP 26-47; From SR 836 to Turnpike 

Mainline; all plazas2

Conversion to All-Electronic

Tolling (Ph 3) $33.0 2010

415462-2 Turnpike MP 0X - 4X and 47 - 53; Golden Glades 

to Griffin Rd; all plazas2

Conversion to All-Electronic

Tolling (Ph 4) $17.9 2012

422418-7 Southern 

Coin Pompano Beach Service Plaza Reconstruction n/a3 2011

1 - 'UC' = under completion as of most current Turnpike plan.

2 - Project is in both Broward and Miami-Dade Counties.

3 - Estimated reconstruction costs not provided by Turnpike.

 (Adapted from Ten-Year Finance Plan in Turnpike June 2009 Master Plan) 

In addition, the MPO has independently estimated the amount of revenue that will be 

available for capital projects that derives from Turnpike operations in Broward County. This 

analysis includes two facilities – the Sawgrass Expressway and approximately two-thirds of 

the “Southern Coin” portion of the Turnpike mainline. The Turnpike has forecasted toll 

revenues for the next ten years for each facility and has projected its annual system-wide 

O&M costs through 2018. These operating costs depend on both the number of miles of 

roadway being maintained and the number of transactions that occur (i.e., the number of 

travelers). By weighting the number of miles in each facility or section of the Turnpike by the 

number of transactions that occur on that facility/section, the MPO is able to create a 

reasonable allocation factor that can be used to attribute O&M costs to the facilities in 

Broward County. In addition, the MPO has estimated the Broward County share of Turnpike 

debt payments by assuming net revenues (i.e., gross revenues less operating costs) will 

provide 1.6 times (1.6x) coverage on debt. Any funds remaining after those debt payments 

are available for capital projects. However, this analysis does not account for expenditures on 

mandatory resurfacing and rehabilitation (“3R”) projects, and those investments would 

occur before any expansion projects and would utilize that available funding. 
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

15 

Exhibit 7 shows the projected Turnpike revenues available for capital in Broward County. 

Again, these are MPO estimates and do not represent official Turnpike projections. 

Exhibit 7: Turnpike Revenues Available for Capital FY 2015-2035 (millions of dollars) 

FY 15

Subtotal

FYs 16-20

Subtotal

FYs 21-25

Subtotal

FYs 26-30

Subtotal

FYs 31-35

Subtotal

21-Year

Tota

Gross Toll Revenues $113 $602 $664 $733 $809 $2,922

Estimated Share of O&M Expenses $41 $225 $261 $302 $350 $1,180

Net Revenues $72 $377 $403 $431 $459 $1,742

Estimated Share of Debt Service $45 $235 $252 $269 $287 $1,089

Revenues Available for Capital $16 $92 $108 $125 $143 $484

(Millions of YOE Dollars)

Sawgrass Expressway and Broward County Portion of Southern Coin

 (Note: Turnpike revenues estimated by Broward MPO – not official Turnpike projections) 
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

16 

3.0 Dedicated Gas Taxes and Transportation Concurrency Fees 

 

There are a number of separate gasoline taxes in the State of Florida which can provide 

revenue for transportation improvements to Florida cities and counties. These gas taxes are: 

• Constitutional Gas Tax (also known as the “Secondary Gas Tax”) 

• County Gas Tax 

• Municipal Gas Tax (as part of the Municipal Revenue Sharing program) 

• Local Option Six-Cent Gas Tax (the “6-Cent LOGT”) 

• Capital Improvement Local Option Gas Tax (the “5-Cent LOGT”) 

• Ninth-Cent Gas Tax 

The first three taxes are imposed by the State and distributed to the Counties, while the last 

three taxes are local option gas taxes which can be imposed by each county, respectively, 

according to its discretion. This section describes the uses of each gas tax by county 

governments and the projected revenues within Broward County. 

3.1 State Motor Fuel Taxes Distributed to the County 

 

• Constitutional Gas Tax (Secondary Gas Tax): Florida levies a two-cent tax per gallon 

on motor fuels sold known as the Constitutional Gas Tax (also referred to as the 

Secondary Gas Tax). Twenty percent of the Constitutional Gas Tax is directly returned 

to the county in which it was collected, while the remaining eighty percent is pledged 

to the State’s road and bridge bonds, which are administered by the State Board of 

Administration. If no such State bonds exist within a given county, then the eighty 

percent of the Constitutional Gas Tax revenues are remitted to the county in which it 

was collected. Any excess of the eighty percent portion not needed for State bonds is 

also remitted. By statute, the Constitutional Gas Tax must be used for the acquisition, 

construction and maintenance of roads. 

 

• County Gas Tax: The County Gas Tax, formerly the Seventh-Cent Gas Tax, is a tax of 

one cent on every gallon of motor fuel sold in a county at the wholesale level. The 

State Department of Revenue administers the tax and redistributes net proceeds to 

the counties. County Gas Tax proceeds are to be used for transportation related 

capital and operating expenditures, and may be used as security for revenue bond 

financing. 

 

• Municipal Gas Tax: The Florida Revenue Sharing Act of 1972, which created the 

Revenue Sharing Trust Fund for Municipalities, was an attempt by the Legislature to 

ensure a minimum level of revenue parity across units of local government. Currently, 

the trust fund receives 1.3409% of sales and use tax collections, 12.5% of the state 

alternative fuel user decal fee collections, and the net collections from a one-cent 

municipal fuel tax. An allocation formula serves as the basis for the distribution of 

these revenues to each municipality that meets strict eligibility requirements. 

Municipalities must use the funds derived from the one-cent municipal fuel tax for 

transportation-related expenditures. During fiscal year 2009, the municipal fuel tax 

represented 28.48% of the total revenue sharing program funding. 

 
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

17 

3.2 Locally Imposed Gas Taxes 

There are three local option gas taxes imposed in Broward County; (i) the up to six cents 

Local Option Gas Tax (the “6-Cent LOGT”), (ii) the Ninth-Cent Gas Tax, and (iii) the Capital 

Improvement Local Option Gas Tax (the “5-Cent LOGT”). All three local option gas taxes are 

authorized by the State Legislature and are imposed, with local discretion, by Broward 

County. 

 

• 6-Cent Local Option Gas Tax: The 6-Cent LOGT is a tax of 1 to 6 cents on every gallon 

of motor fuel and special fuel sold at retail in a county. It may be levied by a majority 

vote of the governing body or by referendum. The proceeds may be used for 

transportation expenditures, both capital and operating, including public 

transportation. The 6-Cent LOGT may be used as security for revenue bond financing. 

Municipalities within each county receive a portion of the total tax proceeds. Broward 

County currently levies the full six cents. 

• Ninth-Cent Gas Tax: The Ninth-Cent Gas Tax, formerly the Voted Gas Tax, is a tax of 

one cent on every gallon of motor fuel and special fuel sold in a county. It may be 

levied by an extra-majority vote of the governing body or by referendum. Pursuant to 

Florida Statutes, the Ninth-Cent Gas Tax was required to be levied on diesel fuel in 

every county beginning January 1, 1994. The proceeds are to be used for 

establishing, operating and maintaining a transportation system, including both 

capital and operating expenditures. Counties are authorized to expend funds in 

conjunction with the state or federal government for joint transportation projects. The 

Ninth-Cent Gas Tax may be used as security for revenue bond financing. 

 

• 5-Cent Capital Improvement Local Option Gas Tax: Passed during the 1993 

legislative session, the 5-Cent LOGT is a tax of 1 to 5 cents on every gallon of motor 

fuel, but not special fuel, sold at retail in a county. It may be levied by a majority plus 

one vote of the governing body or by referendum. The proceeds may be used for 

transportation expenditures needed to meet the requirements of the capital 

improvements element of an adopted comprehensive plan, including public 

transportation. The proceeds may not, however, be used for operations. The 5-Cent 

LOGT may be used as security for revenue bond financing. Broward County currently 

levies the full five cents 

 
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

18 

3.3 Gas Tax Revenues 

Projecting gasoline tax revenues in the current environment is very difficult. The original 

2009 county-level gas tax projections from the state’s Local Government Financial 

Information Handbook were subsequently reduced by 6.5% to address revenue drops 

caused by major reductions in vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The gasoline tax projections for 

Broward County in the table below assume that collections will remain flat through 2011 

and then resume a very modest growth of approximately 1% per year. This growth rate, 

which is well below inflation, means that the purchasing power of the existing gas taxes will 

continue to decline over time. Exhibit 8 shows the projected gas tax revenues in the County 

over the plan period. 

Exhibit 8: Projected Gas Tax Revenues in Broward County (millions of dollars) 

FY 15

Subtotal

FYs 16‐20

Subtotal

FYs 21‐25

Subtotal

FYs 26‐30

Subtotal

FYs 31‐35

Subtotal

21‐Year

Total

Constitutional Fuel Tax $14.5 $74.9 $78.7 $82.7 $86.9 $337.8

County Fuel Tax $6.6 $34.1 $35.9 $37.7 $39.6 $154.0

Municipal Fuel Tax $11.6 $59.7 $62.7 $65.9 $69.3 $269.2

Local Option Fuel Taxes

Ninth Cent $8.6 $44.1 $46.4 $48.7 $51.2 $199.0

1 to 6 Cents ‐ County $30.3 $155.9 $163.8 $172.2 $181.0 $703.2

1 to 6 Cents ‐ Municipal $18.1 $93.2 $98.0 $103.0 $108.2 $420.6

1 to 5 Cents ‐ County $23.2 $119.3 $125.4 $131.8 $138.5 $538.1

1 to 5 Cents ‐ Municipal $13.0 $67.2 $70.6 $74.2 $78.0 $303.0

TOTAL FUEL TAXES $125.9 $648.4 $681.5 $716.3 $752.8 $2,924.8

3.4 Transportation Concurrency Fees 

The Transportation Concurrency Management system divides Broward County into ten 

Concurrency Districts. Two of these districts (Northwest and Southwest Districts) are 

designated as Standard Concurrency Districts, where roadway improvements are 

anticipated to be the dominant form of transportation enhancement. The remaining eight 

districts are designated as Transportation Concurrency Management Districts in which the 

level of service standards are oriented towards transit improvements and Transportation 

System Management (TSM) strategies. The district boundaries and designations were the 

result of extensive consultations with the municipalities. Transportation Concurrency 

assessments are based on selected projects within a five-year Capital Improvement Program 

adopted by the County Commission. The Transportation Concurrency Assessment is 

calculated as the total peak-hour trip generation of the proposed development, multiplied by 

a constant dollar figure for each District, that represents the cost per trip of the selected 

enhancements in that District. The revenues from Transportation Concurrency Assessments 

must be used to fund transportation enhancements in the District from which it was 

collected. 
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

19 

Revenues from concurrency fees grew strongly during the recent housing and construction 

boom. Total annual revenues from the eight districts totaled $2.6 million in FY05, grew to 

$5.2 million in FY06, and peaked at $10.4 million in FY07. Since then, however, revenues 

have declined substantially along with the housing market, with an FY10 projection of only 

$2.6 million. Based on the projected length of the current downturn, the MPO believes that 

concurrency fees will stay at this level through 2011 and then grow modestly thereafter at 

the rate of inflation. The projected transportation concurrency fee revenues in the County 

during the plan period are presented in Exhibit 9. 

Exhibit 9: Projected Transportation Concurrency Fees in Broward County 

(millions of dollars) 

FY 15 

Subtotal

FYs 16-20 

Subtotal

FYs 21-25 

Subtotal

FYs 26-30 

Subtotal

FYs 31-35 

Subtotal

21-Year

Total

Transportation 

Concurrency Revenues $2.9 $16.0 $18.6 $21.5 $24.9 $83.9
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

20 

4.0 Agency Revenues 

 

4.1 Broward County Transit 

Broward County Transit (BCT) provides bus and paratransit services over a 410-square mile 

service area in Broward County, and its buses provide inter-county connectivity with the 

Palm Beach and Miami-Dade transit systems as well as the Tri-Rail commuter rail services 

offered by the South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA). BCT has a total 

active fleet of 295 fixed route buses and 96 community buses, and it offers 40 routes 

serving over 5000 designated bus stops in the County. Total annual service provided 

exceeds 14 million revenue vehicle miles, and over 38 million annual passenger trips are 

taken on BCT services.3

BCT operating expenses are supported by a range of revenue sources. Passenger fare 

revenues are projected to cover approximately 20% of BCT operating costs (based on the FY 

2010 operating budget), necessitating a substantial subsidy from public sources. These 

sources include local general funds, proceeds from the local option gas tax (LOGT), and 

state operating support. LOGT revenues been described in the previous section and are not 

included here, in order to avoid double-counting. 

Exhibit 10 summarizes the other projected operating revenues that will be available to BCT 

in the future. The MPO assumes that total fare revenues will grow at a rate of only 1.5% 

annually, meaning that the farebox recovery ratio will decline slowly over time. And as with 

other revenue sources, the MPO assumes that both local general funds and state operating 

support will be flat through 2012 until the economy recovers. After that, local general fund 

support will grow with inflation (at 3% per year), while state operating support growth will lag 

slightly behind inflation, thus slowly losing purchasing power. 

Broward County also receives significant state and federal funding for transit capital, as well 

as a small amount of support from transportation concurrency fees. The state transit capital 

grants have already been accounted for in the FDOT sections of this memo, and this also 

does not include possible federal New Starts funding support, which has also been outlined 

above. Transportation concurrency fees have also been described above. Federal transit 

capital support has varied widely in the past five years, but it is projected at $23.4 million for 

FY10. Exhibit 10 also shows the federal transit capital grant support that will be available to 

the County, assuming that federal support following the reauthorization grows at a rate of 

4%, or slightly above that of inflation. 

 

3 All BCT service exhibits as of January 2009. 
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

21 

Exhibit 10: Broward County Transit Forecast Revenues (millions of dollars) 

FY 15

Subtotal

FYs 16‐20

Subtotal

FYs 21‐25

Subtotal

FYs 26‐30

Subtotal

FYs 31‐35

Subtotal

21‐Year

Total

TOTAL Transit Operating Funding

(Not Included Elsewhere) $80.1 $428.4 $480.2 $538.8 $605.2 $2,132.7

TOTAL Transit Capital Funding

(Not Included Elsewhere) $25.8 $137.1 $151.4 $167.2 $184.6 $666.1

County Contribution to SFRTA $5.1 $28.8 $33.8 $39.7 $46.6 $154.0

4.2 Tri-Rail/SFRTA 

SFRTA provides the Tri-Rail commuter rail service along a 70-mile rail corridor connecting 

Palm Beach, Broward, and Miami-Dade Counties. Tri-Rail serves 18 stations along the 

corridor and connects with the Metrorail in Miami to provide access to downtown Miami. TriRail was initially created by FDOT in 1987 to provide supplementary commuter access 

during the widenings of I-95 and the Turnpike and was intended to be temporary. However, 

the service proved popular and has been retained ever since, and line extensions and 

additional fleet purchases have extended Tri-Rail’s reach and service quality. Most recently, 

Tri-Rail completed a major double-tracking project (supported by federal New Starts funds), 

which included a new high-level fixed bridge over the New River near Ft. Lauderdale. 

SFRTA is supported by annual capital and operating contributions from each of the three 

counties, in addition to state and federal grant support and fare revenues. SFRTA has been 

seeking a dedicated stream of funding, with a rental car surcharge as the most likely funding 

source, but it has not yet achieved that goal. Due to the recession and the lack of available 

local funding, all three counties are currently contributing the statutory minimum amount 

($4.2 million per year) to SFRTA, and that funding level will continue. If the legislation 

governing SFRTA contributions by the counties is changed or if a dedicated funding source 

for SFRTA is created, then the Plan can be updated accordingly. 

Funding from Broward County to SFRTA passes through Broward County Transit and has 

been included as a line item in the BCT exhibits above.
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

22 

4.3 Broward County Port Everglades Department 

Port Everglades, which is sited on land within three municipalities (Hollywood, Fort 

Lauderdale, and Dania Beach) as well as unincorporated Broward County, is one of the 

country’s top container ports and also one of its busiest cruise ship departure ports. Port 

Everglades is also the main seaport in South Florida for receiving petroleum products such 

as gasoline and jet fuel. The port is a major economic engine for Broward County, and the 

Port Everglades Department is a self-supporting enterprise fund of the County, meaning it 

does not receive local tax funding to support its operations or capital improvements. 

State funding for Port Everglades capital improvements may be available through the SIS 

and TRIP programs, but these funds have already been accounted for previously. In addition, 

the County Incentive Grant Program (CIGP) could also be a source of port funding, but those 

funds have also been accounted for in the “Other Arterial Construction/ROW” category in the 

FDOT projections. However, there is one additional source of port capital funding which has 

not been included previously, which is the Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic 

Development (FSTED) Program. The program is described in the excerpt below from the 

website of the Florida Ports Council. Projecting the revenues that might be available to any 

single port from the FSTED Program is very difficult, and so those revenues are not included 

in this baseline revenue projection. But this program could prove valuable in the future for 

dealing with freight and passenger congestion at Port Everglades. 

The Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development (FSTED) 

Council is a public entity created by statute and charged with implementing 

the state's economic development mission by facilitating the implementation 

of seaport capital improvement projects at the local level. The Council was 

created within the Department of Transportation and consists of the port 

directors of the 14 publicly owned seaports and a representative from the 

Department of Transportation, the Department of Community Affairs, and the 

Governor's Office of Tourism, Trade and Economic Development. 

In 1990, the State Legislature created the FSTED Program, under Chapter 

311, Florida Statutes (F.S.), to finance port transportation projects on a 50-50 

matching basis. They established this alternative to the traditional 

Department of Transportation program because they understood the 

importance of Florida's international trade to the state's economic progress 

and job creation and because they recognized the urgency of building the 

transportation capacity needed for the state's 14 public deepwater seaports 

to satisfy their customer's demands and compete in the fast-paced global 

marketplace. 

Chapter 311 creates a partnership between the state and its seaports. It is 

driven by an approach to project development that reflects the special 

characteristics of seaports: they are public entities, but must function as 

businesses to fulfill their public purpose. Like any business, they must 

demonstrate a service orientation and prompt response to customer demand, 

flexibility to meet changing market trends and accountability to ensure sound 
Technical Report # 6 

Financial Resources 

23 

investments. This approach is key to the success of Chapter 311 and the 

seaport bond financing programs authorized by Section 320.20, F.S., in 

accelerating the pace at which our seaports have been able to build the 

facilities needed to compete with out of state ports and to sustain and 

enlarge the state's share of international commerce. 

The FSTED Program requires consistency with local plans and matching funds 

from each seaport; thus seaport investments are driven by a local 

commitment to meet the community's strategic objectives. 

... 

Responsibility for project development through the FSTED Program is thus 

initiated at the local level, based on an understanding of market demand and 

local seaport opportunity and capacity. At the State level, project review is 

accomplished by three state agencies that are full voting members of the 

FSTED Council. They are the departments of Transportation, Community 

Affairs and the Governor's Office of Tourism, Trade and Economic 

Development. 

Section 311.07(3)(a), Florida Statues, provides that program funds will be 

used to fund approved projects on a 50-50 matching basis with any of the 

deepwater ports which is governed by a public body. An approved project is a 

project that has been approved by the FSTED Council. Grant funding under 

the program is limited to specific types of port facilities or port transportation 

projects.

4.4 Broward County Aviation Department 

The Broward County Aviation Department (BCAD), like the Port Everglades Department, is 

also a self-supporting enterprise fund of the county. BCAD is responsible for the operation of 

the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport (FLL) as well as North Perry Airport 

(HWO), a small general aviation airport. FLL is a major economic engine for the County, 

supporting its tourist and other business sectors and also drawing passengers with final 

destinations throughout South Florida due to its relatively low-cost status and large number 

of airlines and flight options. 

BCAD operations are supported by an array of different revenue sources, including 

concession fees, parking fees, building and ground rentals, rental car facility charges, 

passenger facility charges, and federal and state grants. No local tax funding is used to 

support aviation operations. For capital investments, as with Port Everglades, State funding 

may be available through the SIS and TRIP programs, but these funds have already been 

accounted for previously. 
5.0 Summary of Forecast Revenues A summary of the forecast revenues described above is presented in Exhibit 11 in Year of Expenditure (YO12 represents the same information in 2009 dollars. While the MPO does not have direct decision-making revenues shown here (in particular, the Turnpike has its own long range capital planning process and coimportant to show the full range of highway and transit funds that will be available for use within the Coyears. Exhibit 11: Summary of Projected Baseline Revenues (YOE dollars) for Broward County (millions of dolYEAR‐OF‐EXPENDITURE REVENUE PROJECTIONS FY 15

Subtotal

FYs 16‐20

Subtotal

FYs 21‐25

Subtotal

FYs 26‐30

Subtotal

FDOT ‐ SIS/FIHS $97 $639 $63 $0 FDOT ‐ "Mega‐Projects" (uncertain timing) $3,304 FDOT ‐ Other Arterial, Transit, TMA $91 $517 $570 $607 FDOT ‐ Product Support (Equal to 20% of Other Arterial) $9 $54 $60 $64 State & Federal Transit New Starts $45 $175 $163 $163 Turnpike (revenues available for capital) $16 $92 $108 $125 Fuel Taxes (Constitutional, County, Municipal, LOGTs) $126 $648 $681 $716 Transportation Concurrency Fees $3 $16 $19 $22 Broward County Transit Operating (not included elsewhere) $80 $428 $480 $539 Broward County Transit Capital (not included elsewhere) $26 $137 $151 $167 County Contribution to SFRTA $5 $29 $34 $39 Estimated Fare Revenue from Premium Transit $95 TOTAL $498 $2,735 $5,632 $2,538 Estimated Broward TRIP Funds ‐ Illustrative Projects Only $13 $56 $54 $54  (Note: Turnpike revenues estimated by Broward MPO – not official Turnpike projections) 
Exhibit 12: Summary of Projected Baseline Revenues (2009 dollars) for Broward County (millions of doBASE YEAR (2009) REVENUE PROJECTIONS FYs 14‐15

Subtotal

FYs 16‐20

Subtotal

FYs 21‐25

Subtotal

FYs 26‐30

Subtotal

FDOT ‐ SIS/FIHS $79 $466 $39 $0 FDOT ‐ "Mega‐Projects" (uncertain timing) $2,052 FDOT ‐ Other Arterial, Transit, TMA $74 $378 $354 $321 FDOT ‐ Product Support (Equal to 20% of Other Arterial) $7 $39 $37 $34 State

& Federal Transit New Starts $37 $128 $101 $86 

Turnpike (revenues available for capital) $13 $67 $67 $66 Fuel Taxes (Constitutional, County, LOGTs) $103 $473 $423 $379 Transportation Concurrency Fees $2 $12 $12 $11 Broward County Transit Operating (not elsewhere included) $65 $307 $290 $275 Broward County Transit Capital (not elsewhere included) $21 $100 $94 $88 County Contribution to SFRTA $5 $27 $29 $31 Estimated Fare Revenue from Premium Transit $50 TOTAL $408 $1,996 $3,498 $1,343 Estimated Broward TRIP Funds ‐ Illustrative Projects Only $10 $41 $33 $28 
!!

!!

!

!

±

WEST PALM BEACH AREA

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd

Northlake Blvd

Indiantown Rd

Beeline Hwy

Southern Blvd

Okeechobee Blvd

PGA Blvd

Persimmon Blvd

60th St

A1A

SW 18th St

A1A

Blue

SR 7

Florida's Turnpike

Jog Rd

Military Trail

Yamato Rd

Glades Rd

Haverhill Rd

95

Donald

PGA Blvd

Ross Rd

Heron Blvd

95

Lantana Rd

Hypoluxo Rd

Gateway Blvd

Boynton Beach Blvd

Lake Ida Rd

Atlantic Ave

Linton Blvd

Clint Moore Rd

Forest Hill Blvd

Powerline Rd

Congress Ave

Woolbright Rd

Belvedere Rd

Lake Worth Rd

Lyons Rd

Palmetto Park Rd

Hood Rd

45th St

Golf Rd

95

US 27

US 27

SR 80/US 441

CR 717

SR 715

SR 700/US 98

LAKE OKEECHOBEE

US 441

GLADES AREA

Proposed Palm Tran

Bus System

Community Bus Service

Existing Tri-Rail Station

Existing Tri-Rail Route

Proposed Tri-Rail Station

Proposed Tri-Rail Route 

Expansion

New Interchange

CSX and FEC Existing 

Railroad Lines

Existing Park-N-Ride Facility

Proposed Park-N-Ride Facility

Proposed Bus Rapid Transit 

(BRT)

The Cost Feasible Plan Transit System represents the Palm Tran 

System, Bus Rapid Transit Routes along SR 7 and Glades Rd.

New Urban Interchange

Existing Intermodal Center

P:\PROJECTS\08011_Palm Beach 2035 LRTP\CF Plan\CF 2\GIS\CF2-Transit Base-2035.mxd

LEGEND NOTES

Proposed Inland Port

Proposed Regional Rail

Proposed Rail Transit Service

2035 Cost Feasible 2 Plan - Transit Component

95

06/16/09

Reduced Headway to Transit 

Routes 2 and 3

New Intermodal Center

New Glades Transit Routes
! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! !

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^^ ^

^ ^ ^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

W

W

CS

RPD

W

W

I

I

I

I

I

RPD RPD

I

RPD

W

SF7

ROS

SF7

W

SF7

SF7

RPD

I

RPD

I

SF7 I

SF14

SF7

I

ROS

SF14

CS

DMPBTIII

GC

SF7

GC

CSPD

SF7

I

GC

RPD

RPD

CPD

I

SF14

RPD

CPD

CS

RPD

CS

CSPD

RPD

MF14

MF32

DMPBTI

W

CPD

SF7

SF7

SLT

SF7

CSPD

W

I

PC

CS

NC

CPD

SF7

CSPD

IPD

SF7

ROS/PD

ROS

RPD

GC

SF7

SF14

RPD

GC

SF7

CS

CPD

SF7

AC

CS

CSPD

ROS

RPD

CS

RPD

PC

CS

OC

IPD CS

CS

RPD

GC

RPD

SLT

I

MF32

MF14

RPD

MF32

CS

SF14

PC

SF7

RPD

W

RPD

CSPD

SF11

CPD

RPD

CSPD

CPD

NC

SF7

RPD

CPD

GC

NC

RPD

CPD

MF20

CS

RPD

OC

RPD

RPD

ROS

SF7

CPD

RPD

RPD

CS

CSPD

MF32

CSPD

CPD

CSPD

CPD

MF14

MF32

CS

CS

GC

CPD

CPD

MF14

SF14

RPD

RPD

RPD

RPD

MF32

MF20

IPD MF32

CPD

RPD

SF14

SF11

RPD

RPD

CPD

DMPBTI

CS

GC

CSPD

OC

I

CPD

CS

CSPD

GC

MF20

CS

MF32

CS

DMPBTIV

SF7

I

NC

RPD

GC

OC

CS

RPD

MF32

SF14

MF32

RPD

ROS

GC

MF32

GC

CS

SLT

AC

OC

NC

CS

CM

GC

RPD

SF14

CS

MF20

DMPBTII

CS

RPD

RPD

GC

RPD

RPD

OC

CS

MF14

OC

RPD

RPD

RPD

RPD

ROS

GC

RPD

PC

I

CS

CMUD TYPE I

BMUD TYPE I

DMPBTIII

RPD

RPD

RPD

CSPD

CPD

RPD

RPD

MF20

MF32

MF32

RPD

CPD

RPD

CS

MF32

SF7

RPD

CPD

MF32

RPD

CS

MF32

RPD

BMUD TYPE II

CPD

NC

GC

NC

CPD

POR/PD

RPD

CSPD

CS

CS

CPD

NC GC

MF20

RPD

PC

RPD

CPD

MF32

MF14

GC

MF32

POR

NC

NC

CC2

MF32

MF20

NMUD TYPE III

ROS

RPD

MF14

CS

RPD

CS

MF20

-

GC

DMPBTIV

CSPD

CPD

NC

CPD

SLT

MF20

SLT

CS

GC

RPD

CMUD TYPE I

CS

NC

SLT

GC

IPD

SLT

PC

SLT

GC

CPD

NC

NC

ROS

CS

MF32

MF20

POR

GC

GC

ROS

RPD

MF32

POR/PD

MF20

ROS

RPD

CPD

RPD

ROS

GC

RPD

MF32

NC

RPD

ROS

ROS

CS

SF14

POR/PD

ROS/PD

GC DMPBTIV

DMPBTIII

CPD

GC

NC

SLT

MF32

ROS

GC

MF20

SLT

ROS

ROS

SLT

NC

RPD

SLT

DMPBTIV

MF20

CMUD TYPE II

MF14

CPD

NC

NC

MF14

CPD

SLT

DMPBTIII

DMPBTIII

RPD

DMPBTIII

ROS

SLT

CMUD TYPE I

DMPBTII

OCPD

NC

CPD

NMUD TYPE II

MF20

NMUD TYPE I

RPD

OC

CS

MF20

POR/PD

SLT

ROS

ROS

RPD

CMUD TYPE II

ROS

DMPBTII

DMPBTIV

CPD

POR/PD

OC

MF32

ROS

ROS

RPD

RPD

NC

MF32

ROS

CMUD TYPE III

GC

POR

CSPD

SLT

POR

GC

CMUD PUBLIC GREEN

MF14

ROS

CSPD

SLT

SLT

SLT

DIXIE

OLIVE

JOG

FLORIDAS

PARKER

GEORGIA

VILLAGE

CONGRESS

45TH

7TH

NORTHLAKE

BI SI

FLAGLER

L

MILITARY

TAMARIND

AUSTRALIAN

INTERSTATE 95

30TH

PINEWOOD

GARDEN

N

BROADWAY

PALM BEACH LAKES

15TH

6TH

23RD

13TH

M

SOUTHERN

EMBASSY

54TH

BELVEDERE

WINDSOR

FERN

SAPODILLA

42ND

DYER

3RD

BANYAN

SARATOGA

8TH

GREENWOOD

SANDHILL

39TH

FOREST HILL

DOUGLAS

ROSEMARY

OKEECHOBEE

MERCER

4TH

DATURA

40TH

5TH

HAVERHILL

PARK

SUMMIT

FLORIDA

WEBSTER

HUNTER

41ST

CLARE

44TH

110TH

46TH

51ST

47TH

48TH

DIVISION

MERRILL

SHILOH

O

50TH

EVERNIA

AVON

BRANDYWINE

55TH

LAKE

57TH

CLEMATIS

58TH

CUMBERLAND

59TH

EADIE

52ND

35TH

53RD

SHORE

34TH

QUADRILLE

P

2ND

BUNKER

WARE

WILDCAT

LYTLE

IRONHORSE

38TH

WASHINGTON

SHAKER

GREEN

DOCK

20TH

SEQUOIA

43RD

MARTIN

DREHER

OTTER

LINDA

UPLAND

EASLEY

AUDUBON

SELKIRK

SUNSET

21ST

FLORIDA MANGO

24TH

EDMOR

49TH

PALMETTO

RIVERWALK

LAKES

PARKE

ROBBINS

HILLCREST

NOTTINGHAM

PURITAN

32ND

GALE

FLAMINGO

POTTER

EXECUTIVE CENTER

CHURCHILL

36TH

GREGORY

BEE LINE

IRIS

27TH

19TH

BEAR ISLAND

PLYMOUTH

PRESIDENTIAL

STATE ROAD 7

MURRAY

QUIDA

PINEHURST

ISLAND

26TH

17TH

RILYN

HOLLYWOOD

SHENANDOAH

TECUMSEH

ELLAMAR

16TH

AVILA

9TH

MCINTOSH

CHILLINGWORTH

CARVER

KANUGA

37TH

LOCUST

LYMAN

ALHAMBRA

MONCEAUX

ELECTRONICS

HENRIETTA

ARDMORE

LAKEWOOD

ANDROS

BRISTOL

ELWA

PINE CAY

EXCHANGE

RUSSLYN

25TH

PINE

11TH

MACY

HIGH

LILAC

HAWKS LANDING

MALVERNE

TUXEDO

KAYE

MANNING

MONROE

BAKER

WINTERS

PILGRIM

BAYW NI DS

GARDENIA

FRANKLIN

CLAREMORE

EASTVIEW

31ST

CARIBBEAN

BISCAYNE

COLONIAL

SPENCER

BELMONT

GRANT

22ND

WILKINS

HURON

HAMPTON

SEVILLE

WESTVIEW

UNKNOWN

ALPINE

MANGONIA

EAGLE

HEATH

OMAR

COMMUNITY

MADDOCK

ECHO LAKE

EATON

14TH

BRIGGS

29TH

KITTBUCK

PRESIDIO

CORTEZ

ELIZABETH

WITT

SERV CI E ALLEY

HADEN

CLEAR LAKE

WALTON

TEMPLE

FOX

SUMMA

28TH

10TH

LATONA

ERIE

TRINITY

GATOR

RED RIVER

VINCENT

ONTARIO

ROEBUCK

GREYMON

HIBISCUS

DOBBINS

CORPORATE

ALMERIA

HANK AARON

HIGHLAND

18TH

TERRACE

WAVERLY

DE SOTA

RIDGEWOOD

CHARLOTTE

33RD

WORTH

RUTLAND

NORTON

NILE RIVER

CHASE

BEVERLY

TURTLE

IRMA LAKE

HAMILTON

HANSEN

VALENCIA

GRAY

NATHAN HALE

ALABAMA

FRANCIS

OLYMPIA

BEACON

LEIGH

BUTLER

NORTHPOINT

OLD OKEECHOBEE

LOFTIN

AUSTIN

LIVINGSTON

VALLEY FORGE

BUNKER RANCH

OSPREY

GLENRIDGE

EDGEWOOD

GILA

PERSHING

JAMES RIVER

GRANADA

ROWLEY

EL VEDADO

BRADLEY

FERNWOOD

CORDOVA

COLUMBIA

56TH

CLYDE

SUPERIOR

TIGRIS

RAILROAD

SAN ANDROS

UP THE GROVE

TERRA LAGO

CALVIN

HOBART

PINE ISLAND

LAKE TAHOE

COSTELLO

SAND CAY

CLEARWATER

STATE

ROYAL PALM

ANDREWS

GLENN

CONNISTON

SHELLEY

PALM

BOYD

CHAGALL

NARCISSUS

WILLOW POND

HERITAGE

SERVICE

WENONAH

CENTREPARK

LAURIE

CELEBRATION

BOLLARD

MIRAMAR

HERONWOOD

CHARLES

HILLSBORO

LINCOLN

LAKEVIEW

ELKHORN

PORTER

BOOKER

PENN

BLOOMFIELD

ORTEGA

KERN

ARLINGTON

BARCELONA

A E ISAACS

ADAMS

WESTWOOD

BEAUTIFUL

CHEERFUL

PRESERVE

DEER POINT

MICHIGAN

GRANDE

OGSTON

MUSKOGEN

DUVAL

GREEN PINE

SANTA LUCIA

ROBERT

LAKE LUCERNE

MONTE VERDE

68TH

CROSS

PUTNAM

SHELLY

FALCON GREEN

ORANGE

EGRET LAKES

VICTORIA

PARADISE

DIANA

BAY POINT

SPARROW HAWK

REVERE

FOXHALL

CAMELLIA

MARKET

CLARKE

WHITEHALL

ESSEX

WRIGHT

HAWKS

WRENA

HENRY

MILLER

WILDERNESS

LYTTON

CLARK

LIDDY

SPYGLASS

LAINHART

UNITED

SWANSEA

GRASSY BAY

KINGS

ROCKLAND

CLIPPER

INDUSTRIAL

COLUMBUS

PAMELA

RUGBY

LAKEN

SPRUCE

RIDGEWAY

HILTONIA

EAST

VIA VILLAGIO

ABRAHAM

FLAGLER MEMORIAL BRIDGE

WILDER

ANHINGA

LINEYARD WATER

BAY HARBOUR

MCGINLEY

GOLF

BELMONTE

EGRET POINTE

CENTRAL

WESTERN

TRAVELER

ROBINS

EGRET MEADOW

SPRING CREEK

MADEIRA

VIRGINIA

EL PRADO

KENWOOD

TURTLE ISLAND

GLENWOOD

ARGYLE

TORRES

NEWARK

PINE RIDGE

MORTON

VALLETTE

PINE SAGE

CARGILL

ELAINE

TANGLEWOOD

ARKONA

MEADE

CAFFIA

SOPHIA

CONSULATE

PALMBROOKE

LEGEND CLUB

EDEN

FOREST

AVENIDA HERMOSA

LANTERN BAY

REYNOLDS

PUTNAM RANCH

EDGAR

BIGNONIA

MANGROVE

EMBARCADERO

62ND

FAIRWAY

WHALTON

1ST

CAROLINE

MAYFLOWER

TELOGIA

FISH CREEK

KIFER

ANTIETAM

PASEO ANDORRA

CHICKARINES

BURGOYNE

ALAMANDA

ROSELAND MAGNOLIA

WILDEMERE

NEW YORK

HANDY

UNION

MEDINA

TRADITION COVE

TALLADEGA

NORTH FORK

HUDSON

BREVARD

MAGGIORE

65TH

80TH

KENILWORTH

71ST

ALLENDALE

OLYMPIC

OAKMONT

BOB O LINK

IRWIN

INDEPENDENCE

WATERFORD

WARREN

SOELCA

SUGAR LOAF

WORTHINGTON

TARPON LAKE

NEW JERSEY

THE POINTE

TUSCALOOSA

PASEO MORELLA

WHITE WING

WILMOT

PASEO CASTALLA

OXFORD

JAMES

BROOKS

IROQUOIS

JEFFERSON

CYPRESS POINT

HANNAH

XIANG RIVER

BLUE SPRINGS

GRUBER

HAWTHORNE

69TH

75TH

72ND

CRANESNEST

SARATOGA BAY

QUAIL MEADOW

MESA

BRIDGE PORT

ALTON

73RD

74TH

TECHNOLOGY

PIGEON CAY

ROOSEVELT

SANDPIPER

COMMERCE

AKERS AWAY MHP

HOPE BAY

70TH

12TH

CUYAHOGA

PARKLAND

LOMBARD

MCKENNA

63RD

SOUTHARD

GREEN CAY

PRAIRIE

SANDY CAY

60TH

CANYON

SENECA

NICHOLLS

FRESHWATER LAKES

HILLCREST MEMORIAL PARK CEMETERY

CARDINAL NEWMAN HIGH SCHOOL

DAKOTA

CROZET

QUAIL

PARKLAND

OLD OKEECHOBEE

35TH

MARTIN

2ND

22ND

39TH

FRANKLIN

6TH

ALLENDALE

DE SOTA

1ST

45TH

51ST

ARDMORE

MADDOCK

OKEECHOBEE

59TH

8TH

42ND

38TH

NATHAN HALE

11TH

41ST

UPLAND

42ND

UNKNOWN

10TH

44TH

40TH

GREGORY

4TH

29TH

39TH

18TH

UPLAND

28TH

TUXEDO

LOCUST

CONNISTON

WASHINGTON

45TH

55TH

2ND

PARK

49TH

20TH

7TH

ARLINGTON

52ND

37TH

31ST

43RD

7TH

11TH

PALM

9TH

11TH

27TH

15TH

57TH

LAKE

BREVARD

HANSEN

GLENWOOD

7TH

MACY

KANUGA

LYTLE

OKEECHOBEE

10TH

OMAR

UNKNOWN

COLONIAL

22ND

RAILROAD

53RD

2ND

OMAR

LAKE

IRIS

16TH

SUNSET

10TH

58TH

26TH

6TH

AVENIDA HERMOSA

SUMMA

4TH

31ST

FLAGLER

WINDSOR

ARLINGTON

33RD

39TH

13TH

JOG

38TH

9TH

21ST

39TH

HIBISCUS

33RD

8TH

34TH

27TH

HAMPTON

27TH

RIDGEWAY

AVON

BRADLEY

FLORIDA

52ND

11TH

8TH

5TH

FLAGLER

AVON

26TH

10TH

29TH

MONROE

45TH

ANDREWS

MILITARY

33RD

44TH

WINDSOR

FLORIDA

27TH

LAKEWOOD

47TH

8TH

31ST

10TH

9TH

HIGH

OMAR

VALLEY FORGE

35TH

33RD

MILLER

32ND

5TH

49TH

35TH

FLAGLER

28TH

UNKNOWN

3RD

17TH

EL PRADO

GLENWOOD

BISCAYNE

SPRUCE

9TH

SAND CAY

14TH

50TH

NORTON

11TH

54TH

DIVISION

SUMMA

34TH

14TH

WINTERS

HAVERHILL

IRIS

FLAGLER

8TH

10TH

33RD

11TH

LAKEVIEW

HAVERHILL

TAMARIND

FRANCIS

31ST

VICTORIA

PINE

23RD

PARKLAND

GREENWOOD

21ST

38TH

SUNSET

MILITARY

6TH

MANGONIA

AUDUBON

35TH

56TH

GARDEN

37TH

WORTH

19TH

4TH

37TH

CHURCHILL

19TH

SHELLEY

47TH

22ND

33RD

DIVISION

40TH

JOG

ROSEMARY

30TH

42ND

43RD

32ND

45TH

2ND

SUNSET

13TH

34TH

37TH

17TH

ALMERIA

110TH

MACY

53RD

PALMETTO

29TH

DYER

10TH

P.B. County Municipal Complex

City Hall

Post Office

Kravis Center for the PerformingArts

State Regional Service Center

PoliceAdministrative Building/Garage

Seaboard Train Station

Federal Building U.S. Court House

W.P.B. Public Library

St. Anne's Catholic Ch.

Holy Trinity Episcopal Church

P.B County Health Unit

Performance Arts School

First Prysbyterian Church

American Red Cross

P.B. County Social Services

Ballet Florida

First Church of Christ Scientist

New Bethel Church

P. Zion Baptist Ch.

St. Patrick Episcopal Ch.

P.B. County Community Service Dept.

Tabernacle Missionary Baptist Ch.

Payne Chapel A.M.E. Church

Housing & Comm. Development

Friendship Missionary Baptist Church

Palm Beach Junior College

Mt. Zion Missionary Baptist Ch.

Orthodox Zion Primative Baptist Ch.

Historical Museum

Ebenezer Missionary Baptist Ch.

Christ TempleApostolic Faith Ch.

Riddle & Locust Houses

PD

PD

PD

PD

PD

Judicial Center PD

Judicial Center PD

Reflections PD

PD

Phillips Point PD

Channel 5 PD PD

Esperante PD

Lakeside Center PD

PD

Northbridge Centre PD PD

One Clearlake Centre PD

Barnett Centre PD

Clearlake Plaza DPD

Proposed Public Square

G

G

G

G

Northwest Historic District

El Cid Historic District

Flamingo Park Historic District

Belair Historic District

Northwood HIlls Historic District

Old Northwood Historic District

Prospect Park/Southland Park Historic District

Grandview Heights Historic District

Central Park Historic District

Northboro Park Historic District

Mango Promenade Historic District

West Northwood Historic District

Clematis Street HIstoric District

St. Ann's Historic District

City of West Palm Beach

Official Zoning Map and Downtown Regulating Plan

¶

Zoning_Map

<all other values>

zone_class

SF7

SF11

SF14

MF14

MF20

MF32

RPD

PC

POR/PD

BMUD TYPE I

BMUD TYPE II

CMUD TYPE I

CMUD TYPE II

CMUD TYPE III

CMUD PUBLIC GREEN

-

NMUD TYPE I

NMUD TYPE II

NMUD TYPE III

CSPD

CPD

CS

CM

GC

AC

I

IPD

N-MUD

NC

OC

OCPD

POR

ROS/PD

ROS

W

CC2

DMPBTI

DMPBTII

DMPBTIII

DMPBTIV

Special Landscape Treatment

Historic District*

grid

grid1

^ New Location of Civic Importance

Existing Civic Buildings

Required Retail Frontage

Proposed Special Landscape Treatment

Providencia Park

Primary Street

Cross Block Passage

! ! ! !

Voter Referendum Height Limit

Downtown PD

Proposed Garage Location

grid

grid1

Last Updated Map 19, 2005 - Ordinance No. 3849-05

* Individual designated sites not denoted.
I

I

P

T

I

I

GAA

P

B-1

RS-4.4

RS-8

CC

RS-8

P

P

RS-8

I

RS-8

RS-4.4

P

I

RS-8

I

P

I

B-3

RS-8

PEDD

RD-15

AIP

B-1

P

AIP

RS-8

I

RAC-CC

RS-8

I

RS-8

CB

CF

RDS-15

I

RS-8

B-1

CC

B-3

RS-8

CF

RS-8

RS-8

RS-8

P

B-3

RS-4.4

I

RS-8

RS-8

RS-8

RD-15

RC-15

B-1

I

RS-8

RS-8

RS-8

CB

B-2

P

B-1

B-3

B-2

B-1

CF

RS-8

RAC-UV

CB

IOA

RS-8

RD-15

CF

RS-8

B-2

RC-15

CB

RS-4.4

RS-8

B-1

B-2

U

AIP

CF

PRD

B-1

ABA

P

B-2

I

P

CB

CF

CF

B-3

CF-S

RMM-25

B-3

CF

CF

RS-8

RD-15

RMM-25

CF

RM-15

RMH-60

RMH-60

RMM-25

MHP

B-3

CB

RMM-25

CB

I

RO

P

RM-15

RMM-25

RS-8

NBRA

RS-8

RS-8

RD-15

RC-15

RM-15

RML-25

CF

RD-15

P

RMM-25

U

U

I

U

B-1

P

AIP

RS-8

U

CF

RM-15

RO

RS-8

B-1

RM-15

RS-4.4

CF

B-1

RCS-15

RD-15

B-2

CB

RO

RMM-25

P

CB

CF

RMM-25

SLA

RAC-EMU

B-3

RMM-25

CF

RS-8

CF

RMM-25

P CF

RML-25

RD-15

RMM-25

RMH-60

RMH-25

RS-8

B-1

I

CC

RAC-SMU

RMM-25

RS-8

RM-15

CF

B-3

CF-HS

RD-15

RMM-25

RS-8

RMM-25

CF

B-1

CB

B-1

ROA

RMS-15

CB

CF

RAC-RPO

RD-15

RMM-25

RMH-60

B-1

RS-8

CB

CF

RMM-25

P

RAC-WMU

CF

B-2

CF

CF

P

RMM-25

CF

RMH-60

PUD

B-2

RS-8

RD-15

RMM-25

ROA

PUD

B-3

P

RMM-25

CC

RAC-AS

CF

B-1

RMH-60

RMM-25

B-2

P

RMM-25

RS-8

RD-15

RD-15

CF-HS

B-3

P

H-1

RMM-25

RMH-25

RMH-25

B-2

P

RMM-25

RMM-25

RM-15

RMM-25

ROA

B-1

B-1

RMH-60

ABA

RML-25 P

RM-15

I

RS-8

RMM-25

RM-15

B-2

B-3

RM-15

CF-H

B-3

RC-15

RMM-25

CC

P

PCC

RC-15

RS-8

RMH-25

B-2

P

ROC

CB

RMM-25

P

RC-15

RMM-25

RD-15

RML-25

P

B-1

B-1

RML-25

U

RM-15

RMM-25

P

RMH-25

CB

P

P

RMM-25

RMM-25

CF

CF-H

CB

RM-15

P

RML-25

B-3

CF

CB

RML-25

RMH-60

B-3

RM-15

RC-15

CF-HS

RMH-60

B-2

I

RMM-25

RO

RMM-25

U

B-3

CF-HS

P

RML-25

RMM-25

B-2

RD-15

RMM-25

B-3

CF

CB

B-2

RMH-25

RD-15

RC-15

CB

RM-15

R

M

L-25

RM-15

RD-15

RM-15

CF-HS

CB

RDS-15

P

RML-25

RMM-25

U RMM-25

CF

RM-15

ROA

RMM-25

RMM-25

RMM-25

RMM-25

RD-15

CF

P

RMM-25

RMM-25

CB

RMH-25

RM-15

RM-15

P

CB

P

RS-8

RMM-25

CF

RML-25

P

CF-HS

P

RD-15

RD-15

RMM-25

B-1

CB

RMH-25

RML-25

RMM-25

CF

RD-15

RD-15

RMH-60

RMS-15

P

RD-15

RMH-60

ROC

RC-15

CF-H

B-3

RMM-25

RO

RD-15

RMM-25 RS-8

CB

CF

CR

MHP

RMM-25

B-3

RMM-25

RD-15

CF

B-2

CB

B-2

B-2

CF-HS

CB

RM-15

RD-15

B-3

RMH-60

RML-25

B-2

B-1

RO

R

M

M-25

CC

RMM-25

CF-HS

P

B-3

P

B-3

CF-H

P

RO

CF-H

RMM-25

B-3

RMM-25

RMH-60

RM-15

P

CF-H

RMM-25

RMH-25

RM-15

RML-25

CF-H

RMM-25

RMM-25

RMS-15

RMM-25

RMM-25

CB

RML-25

RM-15

CF-H

RD-15

P

RML-25

CB

RMH-25

RMM-25

RMH-60

RMM-25

CF-HS

B-1

B-2

RMM-25

ROC

ROC

RML-25

RD-15

B-1

B-3

RMH-60

CF-H

CF-H

RS-8

RML-25

RO

CB

RMM-25

CB

RMM-25

RMM-25

RMH-25

CF

CF-HS

RMM-25

RO

RO

ROC

RMH-25

CF

CB

RD-15

RMH-25

RD-15

ROC

RML-25

B-2

CF-H

RM-15

RMM-25

H-1

B-3

RM-15

B-1

B-3

CB

CB

ROC

ROA

SBMHA

RMM-25

CB

CF-H

RO

RMM-25

RML-25

RMM-25

RML-25

RMM-25

B-1

X-P

X-P

RMM-25

CF-H

ROA

RC-15

RMM-25

RD-15

ROC

RD-15

RM-15

ROC

RO

RD-15

X-P

ROC

ROC

RMM-25

X-G-R

RO

X-P

RMM-25

RO

CF-H

RS-8

RMM-25

X-P

X-B-OR

ROC

RO

RD-15

ROA

X-P

RD-15

X-P

RMM-25

RMM-25

X-P-R

RMM-25

RD-15

RML-25

CF-H

ROA

RMH-60

X-P

RMM-25

RMH-25

RMM-25

CB

RO

RS-8

RMM-25

ROA

RMM-25

Application of City

Zoning Designation

Pending*

P

B-2

PUD

B-1

Application of City

Zoning Designation

Pending*

Application of City

Zoning Designation

Pending*

Application of City

Zoning Designation

Pending*

P

P

CF-S

PUD

Application of City

Zoning Designation

Pending*

B-3

B-3

B-3

CB

Application of City

Zoning Designation

Pending*

Application of City

Zoning Designation

Pending*

PUD

CF

B-1

RMM-25

RC-15

CB

B-2

B-2

X-P

CB

Application of City

Zoning Designation

Pending*

B-2

P

P

P

CF-H

U

PUD

RMM-25

CF

RD-15

CF-H

B-1,B-3

ORD. C-09-08

PUD

PUD

X-P

X-P

RO

RM-12.67 RM-16

RM-33.5

RD-12.2

CF

CF-HS

RS-6.7

RS-6.85 B

RS-6.85 A

CF-S

RS-3.52

RD-12.22

P

U

CF-HS

CF-HS

CB

P

CF

P

P

P

PUD

P

P

P

P

SRA

C-SA

e

SRA

C-SA

w

I595

N SR7

SR84

N US1

N SR 7

SR 84

N US 1

N I95 NB

N I95 SB

N US441 N US 441

W SR84

N A1A

W SR 84

NW MLK AVE NW 31ST AVE

N FED HWY

NW MLK JR AVE

BAYVIEW DR

N DIXIE HWY

NW 10TH ST

SW 12TH ST

N SR A1A

N STATE ROAD 7

N ANDREWS AVE

NW 19TH ST

N FEDERAL HWY

NW MLK JUN OI R AVE

9I 5 RAMP

STATE ROAD 84

S I95 NB

S A1A

S US1

N ICW

WWY

S US 1

NW 6TH ST

W STATE ROAD 84

W SUNRISE BLVD

S I95 SB

W MCNAB RD

NE 26TH ST

W BROWARD BLVD

NE 62ND ST

NW 21ST AVE

NW MART NI LUTHER K NI G AVE

NE 56TH ST

SW 4TH AVE

NW MART NI LUTHER K NI G JR AVE

W COMMERCIAL BLVD

N ATLANTIC BLVD

SE 17TH ST

S SR A1A

NW 9TH AVE

NW 7TH AVE

W OAKLAND PARK BLVD

S ANDREWS AVE

SW MLK AVE

NW MART NI LUTHER K NI G JUN OI R AVE

NE 15TH AVE

S SR7

CYPRESS CREEK RD

SW 31ST AVE

ELLER DR

NW 5TH AVE

NE 38TH ST

S SR 7

S FED HWY

NW 7TH TER

E LAS OLAS BLVD

SW 42ND ST

SE 9TH ST

N OCEAN DR

N INTRACOASTAL WWY

N FT LAUD BEACH BLVD

E COMMERCIAL BLVD

NW 44TH ST

SW MLK JR AVE

E OAKLAND PARK BLVD

NE 6TH ST

DAVIE BLVD

NW 38TH ST

NW 62ND ST

SE 3RD AVE

NW 39TH ST

S US441

S MIAMI RD

RIVERLAND RD

NE 6TH AVE

W PROSPECT RD

N FT LAUDERDALE BCH BLVD

S US 441

SW 17TH ST

NE 34TH CT

W NEW RIVER W

WY

W SISTRUNK BLVD

MARINA BLVD

NE 45TH ST

NW 68TH ST

MIDDLE RIVER DR

FLORIDA TPKE

N FT LAUDERDALE BEACH BLVD

SW MLK JUN OI R AVE

NE 4TH ST

NW 3RD AVE

N FORT LAUDERDALE BCH BLVD

NE 2ND ST

S FEDERAL HWY

SW 30TH AVE

SE 15TH ST

NE 10TH ST

SE 6TH AVE

NE 33RD AVE

N FORT LAUDERDALE BEACH BLVD

SEABREEZE BLVD

NE 3RD ST

SE 4TH AVE

NE 7TH AVE

NW 26TH ST

SE 6TH ST

I 595 RAMP

EL MAR DR

NW 16TH ST

SW 16TH ST

NW 22ND ST

NW 8TH AVE

NW 15TH AVE

SW 27TH AVE

RAVENSWOOD RD

NW 13TH ST

MCINTOSH RD

NW 23RD AVE

S ICW

WWY

SE 2ND CT

WILTON DR

BRENT JETT BLVD

NW 14TH CT

SW 16TH CT

SW 21ST TER

EL VEDADO DR

N BIRCH RD

NE 21ST AVE

SW MART NI LUTHER K NI G AVE

SW 36TH ST

NW 35TH AVE

S FT LAUD BEACH BLVD

NE 26TH TER

5TH CT

E BROWARD BLVD

OAK ST

E SUNRISE BLVD

S OCEAN DR

NE 25TH AVE

NE 37TH DR

NW 64TH ST

SW MART NI LUTHER K NI G JR AVE

NW 34TH ST

NE 12TH TER

NE 14TH AVE

AVILA DR

NE 51ST ST

JACKSON BLVD

MIDDLE ST

NW 11TH PL

NW

MIDDLE RIVER WWY

DOLPH NI DR

CAROL NI A AVE

NURMI DR

NE 7TH ST

S STATE ROAD 7

SE 12TH ST

NW 15TH CT

SW 23RD AVE

SW 15TH ST

NE FLAGLER DR

SW 30TH ST

E SI ENHOWER BLVD

NE 30TH PL

NW 20TH ST

E PROSPECT RD

DEGAN RD

GALT OCEAN DR

NE 32ND AVE

ARIZONA AVE

NW 12TH AVE

NW 33RD AVE

S FT LAUDERDALE BCH BLVD

NW 69TH CT

SE 11TH ST

CORDOVA RD

NE 35TH DR

NW 30TH CT

NE 18TH AVE

NW 22ND RD

NE 30TH ST

NW 24TH ST

NE 35TH ST

SEAGRAPE DR

SW 9TH ST

NW 49TH ST

SW 47TH AVE

NW 12TH ST

NW 10TH PL

NE 53RD ST

NE 68TH ST

SE 20TH ST

PALM AVE

NE 34TH AVE

MARJORIE A DAVIS ST

ALABAMA AVE

NE 49TH ST

NE 32ND ST

BOUGAINVILLA DR

NE 26TH AVE

SE 7TH ST

NW 15TH TER

SW 28TH ST

SW 40TH ST

SE 14TH AVE

PETERS RD

SW 33RD AVE

PINE AVE

SW 26TH TER

SW 34TH ST

SW 21ST AVE

FEDERAL HWY RAMP

SE 11TH CT

E LAKE DR

NW 8TH ST

F EI STA WAY

NW 7TH CT

EUCLID DR

NE 62ND CT

NE 13TH AVE

NE 9TH ST

NW 29TH ST

SE 28TH ST

SW 14TH CT

SW 44TH TER

NE 8TH ST

SW 14TH ST

NE 9TH AVE

NW 8TH CT

NW 17TH ST

SE 18TH CT

NW EULA JOHNSON ST

CENTER AVE

SE 25TH AVE

CORAL RIDGE ISLES DR

BAY CLUB DR

SW 31ST ST

E COUNTRY CLUB CIR

SW 12TH CT

INLET DR

SE 42ND ST

BURRIS RD

NW 1ST AVE

SE 26TH ST

SE 19TH ST

MIDDLE RIVER WWY

NW 40TH ST

L DI O DR

SE 13TH ST

NW 65TH ST

NE 47TH ST

NE 25TH ST

NW 9TH PL

SE 14TH ST

NE 5TH ST

NE 12TH AVE

E NEW RIVER WWY

PO NI C AI NA DR

SW 13TH ST

SW 44TH AVE

SE 4TH ST

FLORIDA AVE

NE 11TH AVE

HENDRICKS ISLE

MOLINA DR

NE 14TH ST

SE 10TH ST

NE 55TH CT

NW 62ND RD

SW 16TH AVE

SW 18TH ST

IOWA AVE

NE 21ST RD

SW 19TH ST

SW 20TH ST

SW 43RD AVE

IDLEWYLD DR

SE 22ND AVE

NE 1ST ST

NW 37TH ST

CARMENA DR

NE 61ST CT

NE 2ND AVE

SW 20TH CT

N VICTORIA PARK RD

NW 41ST ST

NW 46TH AVE

SW 25TH ST

SW 28TH TER

LAUDERDALE MANORS DR

SW 28TH AVE

SW 43RD WAY

PERIMETER RD

NE 22ND TER

WALNUT ST

LONG ISLAND AVE

BELCHER RD

N OCEAN BLVD

NW 42ND ST

PRIVATE RD

SE 21ST TER

NW 43RD TER

NW 21ST ST

SW 5TH PL

SW 28TH WAY

FAIRFAX DR

SW 42ND AVE

NW 29TH AVE

NW 7TH PL

NW 14TH WAY

NW 36TH CT

SE 16TH CT

POINCIANA ST

NE 46TH CT

E DAYTON C RI

NE 4TH AVE

NE 16TH ST

NW 8TH RD

PLACEDO DR

ROYAL PALM DR

NE 59TH ST

NE 20TH WAY

NE 5TH AVE

ELM ST

NW 56TH ST

SW 41ST AVE

NE 64TH ST

NE 51ST CT

NW 34TH AVE

NE 1ST AVE

SEM NI OLE DR

NW 11TH ST

NW 25TH ST

SW 22ND AVE

NW 43RD ST

PONCE DE LEON

W

DR

YOMING AVE

BAYSHORE DR

W DAYTON C RI

S ATLANTIC BLVD

R VI EI RA SI LE DR

NW INTRACOASTAL WWY

SE 14TH CT

PENNSYLVANIA AVE

NW 11TH CT

NW 53RD ST

NW 9TH TER

SI LE OF PALMS

SW 20TH AVE

E PERIMETER RD

OAKES RD

NE 21ST DR

GUAVA ISLE

SW 1ST TER

SE 6TH CT

N R OI V SI TA BLVD

S OCEAN LN

CORAL WAY

SW 18TH CT

SW 29TH ST

SW 19TH AVE

NE 22ND AVE

NW 43RD CT

NW 10TH CT

SE 1ST ST

NE 22ND DR

SW 26TH ST

SW 23RD ST

INDIANA AVE

NW 19TH TER

NW 36TH ST

SI LE OF VEN CI E

NE 5TH CT

SE 64TH ST

W LAKE DR

ASH ST

NE 55TH ST

HILSEN DR

NE 12TH ST

SW 35TH TER

BIMINI LN

NE 1ST TER

SE 41ST ST

SE 21ST AVE

NE 4TH CT

NE 34TH ST

NW 35TH CT

NE 4TH TER

NW 32ND AVE

NE 23RD AVE

CHATEAU PARK DR

BRYAN BLVD

NE 10TH AVE

NW 2ND ST

NE 24TH TER

NE 20TH AVE

NE 50TH CT

SW 7TH ST

NE 33RD ST

NW 30TH TER

NE 63RD CT

ORANGE ISLE

SE 2ND ST

SW 36TH AVE

MANGO ISLE

NASSAU LN

NW 39TH WAY

DELLAGO DR

NW 38TH AVE

NE 22ND WAY

W TRADE WINDS AVE

SW 12TH TER

NW 18TH CT

NE 18TH ST

AUBURN BLVD

HIMMARSHEE ST

NW 1ST CT

W PERIMETER RD

NW 15TH ST

DEL LAGO DR

SW 39TH ST

NW 66TH ST

NW 15TH PL

SW 6TH ST

ISLA BAHIA DR

NW 27TH AVE

SW 11TH CT

SW 1ST AVE

IMPERIAL POINT DR

NW NEW RIVER WWY

SW 35TH AVE

KEY LARGO LN

NW 19TH AVE

SEA ISLAND DR

SE 16TH ST

NE 15TH ST

CITRUS ISLE

NW 13TH CT

NE 52ND ST

SW 5TH ST

NW 9TH CT

SW 5TH CT

NW 43RD PL

SW 11TH ST

PELICAN ISLE

RIVERSIDE DR

SW 33 TER

NE 7TH PL

OAK TREE DR

NW 65TH PL

DELMAR PL

S NI TRACOASTAL W

WY

MARATHON LN

SE 8TH ST

NE 63RD ST

NE 28TH AVE

NE 29TH CT

NW 6TH AVE

NW 10TH TER

SW 15TH CT

SE 12TH CT

NW 62ND TER

ROYAL PLAZA DR

BARCELONA DR

NW 8TH PL

MARIETTA DR

NW 10TH AVE

NE 3RD AVE

SE 18TH ST

NW 45TH CT

NE 23RD DR

NW 55TH ST

ORTON AVE

NW 33RD CT

NW 32ND CT

SW 43RD ST

SE 1ST AVE

SW 4TH ST

84 SR

SE 24TH AVE

NW 55TH CT

AVOCADO ISLE

1ST AVE

NE 2ND TER

NE 16TH TER

SE 19TH AVE

SW 36TH TER

NW 40TH CT

SW 11TH AVE

SW 34TH TER

NW 41ST AVE

IMPERIAL LN

MANDARIN ISLE

SE 8TH AVE

NE 5TH TER

SW 46TH AVE

SW 8TH ST

NE 28TH ST

NE 4TH PL

NW 46TH CT

NW 33RD ST

RIOMAR ST

FLAM NI GO LN

UTAH AVE

SW 25TH AVE

NE 31ST AVE

CAT CAY LN

SW 7TH AVE

SW 37TH AVE

NE 19TH AVE

NE 29TH ST

ANDROS LN

SW R VI ERS DI E DR

NE 27TH ST

MAINLAND DR

CANAL DR

ARBOR DR

NE 59TH CT

SE 18TH AVE

NW 4TH ST

TERMINAL DR

SE 2ND AVE

TERRAMAR ST

SW 6TH CT

NW 1ST ST

NW 27TH ST

SAN MARCO DR

SE 21ST ST

NE 59TH PL

SW 4TH CT

HAVANA DR

SW 3RD ST

NW 25TH PL

NW 47TH CT

SW 22ND ST

LUCILLE DR

SE 16TH AVE

EDGEWATER RD

CORAL GARDENS DR

NE 30TH CT

NE 40TH ST

NW 30TH ST

NE 26TH PL

COMMERCIAL BLVD

NW 8TH LN

NE 13TH CT

POWELLS RD

ANT OI CH AVE

NE 60TH ST

BASIN DR

SUNRISE KEY BLVD

TENNESSEE AVE

SW 37TH TER

NW 42ND AVE

NE 26TH DR

SW 23RD TER

NE 16TH PL

SOMERSET DR

NW 6TH CT

NE 17TH ST

NE 21ST TER

MHP

E EVANSTON CIR

NE 21ST ST

COVE LAKE RD

NE 42ND CT

NE 39TH ST

CASTILLA ISLE

NW 48TH CT

NW 35TH ST

COCONUT DR

GULFSTREAM LN

NE 20TH DR

NE 16TH CT

NE 27TH DR

LAKE EMERALD DR

ROSE DR

NE 17TH TER

SE 22ND ST

SW 22ND TER

I95NB TO TRI RAIL

NW 18TH AVE

NE 11TH ST

SW 9TH AVE

REHTZ RD

W EVANSTON C RI

PROGRESSO DR

SW 32TH TER

NE 17TH CT

GRANDE DR

NE 67TH ST

IROQUOIS AVE

NE 26TH CT

NE 3RD TER

HIBISCUS AVE

SE 23RD AVE

SE 32ND ST

SW 27TH CT

LLOYD DR

SW 32ND ST

NW 51ST ST

SW 2ND ST

LAGUNA DR

SW 10TH CT

SW 38TH AVE

SW 24TH ST

NW 12TH PL

SW 32ND AVE

NW 6TH WAY

POINSETTIA DR

NE 54TH CT

MOLA AVE

NE 57TH PL

NW 5TH PL

NE 52ND CT

SW 21ST WAY

NE 20TH CT

NW 4TH CT

S NEW RIVER DR E

SW 42ND TER

LEE WAGENER BLVD

NW 66TH CT

Harbor In el t DR

NW 24TH AVE

NE 33RD CT

NEW RIVER DR

SW 13TH CT

NE 25TH CT

KENTUCKY AVE

NE 35TH CT

HICKORY ST

NW 23RD LN

S BIRCH RD

NW 7TH ST

SE 24TH ST

SW 32ND CT

STATE ROAD 7 RAMP

NW 3RD ST

PARK DR

NW 57TH PL

NE 13TH ST

E TRADE W NI DS AVE

NW 32ND ST

AQUA VISTA BLVD

NW 14TH ST

NE 43RD ST

ACCESS RD

NW 34TH CT

SERVICE RD

NW 17TH CT

SW 30TH PL

S RIO VISTA BLVD FLORIDA TPK RAMP

NW 4TH PL

THE P NI ES

SW 8TH AVE

NW 19TH CT

NW 18TH ST

NW 57TH CT

SW 32ND PL

NE 11TH CT

SW 40TH TER

FUEL TENDER RD

SW 15TH TER

NW 41ST TER

MAYAN DR

SW 24TH AVE

PINA DEL RIO

SW 34TH CT

SW 18TH AVE

NW 69TH ST

CORAL RIDGE DR

NW 13TH AVE

SW 17TH AVE

NE 58TH ST

CHERRY ST

SLOCUM ST

SW 38TH TER

NE 57TH CT

NE 18TH TER

WOOD HUE

CAYUGA RD

SE 13TH TER

NW 9TH ST

NW 53RD CT

NW 36TH TER

SW 3RD CT

NE 56TH CT

NW 33RD TER NW 23RD CT

NW 57TH ST

SW 17TH WAY

NW 21ST TER

NE 12TH CT

GARDENIA RD

DE SOTO DR

NW 17TH AVE

NW 17TH TER NW 16TH AVE

NW 16TH TER

S DI NEY LN

NE 13TH TER

YACHT CLUB BLVD

SW 14TH AVE

NW 14TH PL

NW 5TH ST

BONTONA AVE

NW 20TH AVE

NE 24TH PL

NW 28TH ST

SW 14TH TER

NE 57TH ST

SW 40TH PL

GATEHOUSE RD

SE 12TH AVE

SE 36TH ST

NW 32ND TER

SW 1ST ST

FRONTAGE RD

CODRINGTON DR

SW 12TH AVE

GEORGIA AVE

TANGELO ISLE

NW 37TH AVE

NE 36TH ST

SW FLAGLER AVE

WINNEBAGO RD

NE 32ND CT

VERMONT AVE

NE 53RD CT

NW 46TH ST

NE 20TH ST

NE 3RD CT

S PERIMETER RD

NW 47TH TER

E MELROSE C RI

INTRACOASTAL DR

NW 51ST CT

NW 63RD ST

NE 65TH CT

NE 16TH AVE

MERCEDES DR

SW 23RD CT

NE 54TH ST

NW 26TH TER

VICTORIA TER

NE 27TH CT

NW 38TH WAY

NE 24TH ST

SARANAC RD

BRICKELL DR

NW 29TH TER

SW 33RD ST

NW 52ND ST

NW 23RD ST

NE 22ND RD

SW 28TH DR

NW 12TH CT

BERKLEY BLVD

NE 17TH AVE

NE 28TH CT

SW 8TH CT

NE 47TH CT

W MELROSE CIR

NW 27TH CT

NW 6TH PL

S GORDON RD

NE 56TH PL

NW 24TH TER

NW 52ND CT

NE 20TH TER

NW 60TH ST

NW 28TH AVE

NW 34TH WAY

NE 15TH CT

S DIXIE CT

NE 24TH CT

NE 40TH CT

N COMPASS DR

NE 25TH TER

NE 27TH AVE

NW 5TH WAY

MAR NI A BAY DR W

NE 29TH AVE

NW 5TH CT

BARBARA DR

NE 44TH ST

NE 46TH ST

SW KANSAS AVE

ALLENWOOD DR

NW 28TH CT

NE 23RD ST

CHARLEY AVE

SE 12TH WAY

NE 48TH ST

SW 18TH TER

AIRPORT ACCESS RD

SW 21ST CT

SW 33RD CT

NW 31ST WAY

SW 3RD AVE

NW 12TH TER

NE 10TH TER

NW 14TH AVE

NE 42ND ST

ADMIRAL'S WAY

NE 19TH ST

SW 4TH PL

NW 3RD PL

NE 14TH TER

NE 19TH TER

SE 5TH ST

BRYAN PL

CONNTIE CT

NW 50TH CT

NW 27TH WAY

NE 29TH DR

SE 31ST ST

EXECUTIVE AIRPORT WAY

SENECA RD

S SERVICE RD

NW 65TH DR

SW 29TH TER

ROYAL PARK DR

DELAWARE AVE

N SERVICE RD

SW 29TH WAY

ATKINSON AVE

SW 21ST LN

SEA VIEW PL

PACKARD AVE

NE 28TH DR

SE 32ND CT

NE 9TH PL

NE 37TH ST

NE 27TH TER

W PARK DR

NE 66TH ST

SE 25TH ST

SW 42ND WAY

NE 48TH CT

MARINER DR

N PERIMETER RD

NE 22ND ST

NW 47TH ST

SW 30TH TER

SE 29TH ST

SW 5TH AVE

TARPON DR

NE 14TH WAY

SW 34TH AVE

NW 11TH AVE

NW 29TH CT

LAKE POINTE DR

NE 15TH TER

NW 39TH AVE

BELMAR ST

NW 16TH CT

LAGUNA TER

FERN RD

SAILFISH RD

SE 35TH ST

NW 68TH CT

NE 34TH LN

SW 29TH AVE

NW 23RD TER

NW 67TH CT

MOFFATT AVE

NW 24TH CT

N ANDREWS WAY

SW 25TH TER

NE 7TH TER

NE 14TH RD

NW 54TH ST

NW 45TH ST

NW 18TH TER

SEVILLE ST

NW 28TH LN

NE 65TH ST

LAZY LN

NW 27TH LN

SW 34TH WAY

NE 12TH RD

AURELIA PL

NE 34TH DR

NE 14TH PL

NW 3RD CT

ALLEY

SE 14TH PL

NW 25TH AVE

NW 15TH WAY

TEQUESTA ST

NE 41ST ST

SW 26TH AVE

NW 38TH TER

SUNSET DR

MAR NI A BAY DR E

NW 22ND TER

RIVERVIEW DR

SW 21ST ST

NW 25TH TER

OCEAN BAY CLUB DR

NE 61ST ST

OCEANIC AVE

NW 56TH CT

NW 5TH LN

NW 27TH TER

GRACE DR

LAKESIDE DR

NE 25TH PL

H DI DEN FOREST

WAVERLY RD

NE 6TH TER

NW 63RD CT

N ANDREWS AVE EXT

MARION DR

SW 22ND CT

SW 1ST CT

PINES RD

NE 27TH WAY

AVALON AVE

NW 54TH CT

NE 15TH WAY

SW 10TH ST

CORSAIR AVE

SE 10TH AVE

NW 30TH AVE

HIBISCUS PL

NW 36TH AVE

VIRAMAR ST

NE 37TH CT

NE 6TH LN

LAS OLAS CIR

NW 4TH AVE

SE 38TH ST

N SEABREEZE BLVD

NE 43RD CT

NE 30TH DR

TROPIC DR

NW 28TH TER

SW 27TH LN

AURAMAR ST

NE 21ST CT

TAHOE LN

VISTAMAR ST

NW 45TH AVE

COMPASS DR

NW 42ND CT

N PORT ROYALE DR

NW 19TH WAY

NE 21ST WAY

SE 30TH ST

NW 18TH PL

NW 26TH AVE

NW 42ND TER

THE LOFTS

NW 24TH WAY

SW 29TH CT

NE 21ST LN

SW 2ND AVE

NW 28TH WAY

NW 37TH TER

SW 8TH TER

SW 12TH PL

NW 35TH TER

SW 2ND CT

NE 58TH CT

NW 22ND AVE

NE 8TH AVE

NW 30TH WAY

SW 43RD TER

N NEW RIVER DR E

TWIN LAKES MHP

SW 43RD CT

NW 51ST PL

NE 40TH PL

NW 50TH ST

NE 17TH WAY

NE 17TH RD

NW 35TH WAY

S ALMAR DR

NE 12TH WAY

SW 41ST CT

CORTEZ ST

CAPRI AVE

WINDAMAR ST

NW 44TH CT

NE 19TH CT

NW 14TH TER

SW 27TH TER

NE 45TH CT

SW 27TH ST

SE 23RD ST

E CAMPUS CIR

SW 32ND TER

NW 48TH ST

ALBACORE ST

NE 48TH LN

SW 26TH CT

NW 16TH WAY

LOMBARDY AVE

ACACIA CT

SW 24TH CT

PARK LN

NW 21ST CT

NW 9TH LN

SW 16TH TER

W CAMPUS C RI

GRANADA ST

WINDSOR CT

NW 65TH CT

NW 44TH TER

NE 14TH CT

SW 6TH AVE

NW 8TH TER

SW 37TH WAY

SW 15TH AVE

SE 5TH AVE

NW 44TH AVE

NE 39TH DR

SE 10TH TER

SE 5TH TER

WASHINGTON DR

NW 36TH WAY

NW 41ST CT

NW 43RD AVE

NE 24TH AVE

NW 2ND AVE

W LAS OLAS BLVD

ARPEIKA ST

SW 10TH AVE

SW 44TH ST

OAK TREE LN

NW 13TH PL

COLLEY AVE

THE LAKES

HARBOR DR

NE 21ST CIR

E DIXIE CT

NE 25TH WAY

HARMON AVE

NW 49TH CT

NW 25TH WAY

NW 39TH TER

NW 17TH WAY

SW 9TH TER

DUPONT BLVD

SW 13TH AVE

SW 4TH DR

NW 26TH WAY

NE 8TH TER

SW 8TH WAY

W D XI EI CT

MANATEE DR

NW 2ND TER

WB TO I595

HOUSTON ST

SW 33RD TER

NW 39TH PL

SE 11TH AVE

SW 17TH PL

BANYAN ST

SW 39TH AVE

NW 11TH TER

NW 39TH CT

NE 36TH CT

NW 29TH WAY

SW 39TH TER

W OAKLAND PARK ACCESS

NW 13TH TER

SW 10TH TER

SW 11TH PL

NW 32ND WAY

NE 40TH DR

NW 22ND CT

NW 34TH TER

CASTLE HARBOR DR

NW 17TH PL

SE 17TH AVE

COURTNEY ST

S VICTORIA PARK RD

SE 9TH AVE

ASTOR PL

SW 31ST CT

SE 15TH AVE

NW 20TH CT

NW 31ST CT

HALL OF FAME DR

COURT HOUSE DR

17TH ST RAMP

NW 6TH TER

NW 52ND PL

SW 14TH WAY

MIRAMAR AVE

PENN WAY

SW 41ST PL

SI LAND CLUB DR

FORT ROYAL ISLE

SW 41ST ST

BUTTONWOOD ST

NE 14TH LN

ALAMANDA CT

RIVERSIDE PL

SUNSET MHP

NW 22ND WAY SW 38TH ST

VALENCIA ST

MINNETONKA RD

MAGELLAN

NW 29TH PL

NE 44TH CT

NE 7TH CT

SW 27TH WAY

NW FLAGLER AVE

SW 17TH TER

SE 26TH AVE

NW 11TH WAY

SW 20TH TER

SYLVAN LN

LAZY LAKE MHP

RIVER LN

BAY COLONY LN

S COMPASS DR

CLEMATIS PL

S EL PRADO AVE

HEADWAY PARK

NW 51ST RD

NW 33RD DR

NE 6TH CT

R VI ER H GI HLANDS AVE

EL PRADO AVE

SW 34TH PL

N TRADE WINDS AVE

WATERS DI E DR

WINONA LN

JUDGE G.W. TEDDER, SR ST

BREAKERS AVE

NW 30TH PL

DATURA CT

PORTSIDE DR

NW 42ND WAY

NW 1ST LN

SW 45TH AVE

NW 30TH DR

SW 37TH CT

NW 33RD WAY

HARR SI TER

OAKLAND CT

MANATEE CT

NW 26TH CT

PORT ROYALE LN

SE 10TH CT

S TRADE WINDS AVE

NW 58TH CT

SW 28TH CT

NW 45TH WAY

SW 33RD WAY

SE TUNNEL RAMP

NW 3RD TER

SW 24TH TER

SW 45TH TER

SW 37TH ST

SW 42ND CT

5TH KEY DR

HOLLY HEIGHTS DR

HARBORAGE ISLE DR

NW 31ST TER

NE 8TH CT

COMPASS PT

LAKE CT

THOMAS WAY

SW 11TH TER

SW 13TH PL

NW 49TH DR

NE 9TH TER

SW 36TH WAY

NW 23RD RD

NW 66TH DR

SW4TH ST

NE 30TH TER

SW 3RD TER

ISLA BAHIA TER

SW 16TH PL

NW 20TH TER

CHIPPEWA LN

TREEHOUSE LN

NW 29TH DR

PANTHER LN NW 23RD WAY

SHORE CT

NW 26TH RD

COOK ST

NE 8TH WAY

PELICAN COVE RD

SE 33RD ST

NE 31ST RAMP

NE 41ST CT

MARINE CT

SE 26TH TER

NE 44TH PL

NW 53RD PL

NE 28TH PL

SW 19TH CT

GARDEN CT

MANOR LN

E LAUDERWAY

CAPRI DR

NW 45TH TER

NE 30TH AVE

SW 19TH PL

NW 58TH ST

NW 1ST TER

SEBASTIAN ST

1ST KEY DR

TANBARK LN

NW 13TH LN

NW 15TH LN

NE 54TH ST

NE 14TH RD

SW 2ND CT

NE 46TH ST

SE 2ND ST

NE 7TH AVE

NW 49TH ST

SE 1ST ST

NE 63RD CT

SERV CI E RD

SW 32ND CT

SW 16TH AVE

SW 23RD CT

NW 35TH ST

NE 35TH CT

NE 18TH ST

NW 9TH PL

NW 25TH AVE

NE 4TH AVE

NE 14TH ST

SW 43RD ST

NE 58TH CT

NE 20TH TER

NW 1ST ST

NW 8TH AVE

SW 17TH ST

NW 47TH ST

NE 20TH AVE

NW 2ND TER

NE 14TH AVE

NE 30TH ST

NW 36TH ST

NW 21ST TER

NW 35TH AVE

NW 34TH TER

SW 2ND AVE

NE 23RD ST

NW 2ND AVE

SW 2ND AVE

NW 28TH AVE

NE 9TH ST

NE 18TH AVE

NW 12TH ST

NW 52ND CT

NW 15TH CT

NW 33RD AVE

NE 6TH CT

NW 17TH CT

NE 9TH ST

NE 55TH ST

NW 1ST AVE

NW 5TH CT

SW 36TH AVE

NW 11TH ST

NW 40TH CT

NW 7TH CT

NW 36TH CT

NE 40TH ST

NW 29TH TER

SW 18TH TER

NW 35TH ST

NW 28TH ST

NE 7TH AVE

NW 13TH CT

NE 51ST CT

NW 47TH ST

SW 5TH CT

NE 4TH AVE

SW 5TH ST

NE 17TH CT

NW 43RD ST

NW 20TH CT

NE 34TH ST

SW 8TH AVE

NW 34TH CT

NE 26TH DR

ALLEY

NW 29TH ST

NW 20TH ST

NW 5TH ST

NE 59TH CT

SW 31ST ST

NE 5TH ST

NE 1ST AVE

NE 47TH CT

SW 27TH TER

NE 40TH ST

NW 10TH AVE

SE 4TH AVE

NW 49TH ST

NW 29TH TER

NW 2ND ST

NW 4TH ST

NW 42ND ST

SW 21ST CT

NW 30TH ST

NW 16TH AVE

NW 5TH PL

NE 59TH CT

NE 27TH ST

SW 10TH CT

NW 43RD PL

NW 42ND AVE

NE 63RD CT

NW 22ND ST

NW 11TH CT

SW 13TH ST

CONNTIE CT

E PERIMETER RD

SW 42ND AVE

NE 17TH TER

NW 15TH TER

NE 4TH AVE

MIDDLE RIVER DR

NW 37TH AVE

SW 6TH ST

W SR 84

NW 33RD WAY

NW 17TH AVE

NW 64TH ST

NE 16TH TER

SE 10TH ST

SW 21ST ST

SW 5TH ST

SW 28TH AVE

NE 21ST AVE

SW 3RD ST

NW 34TH TER

NW 18TH CT

NW 34TH AVE

NE 17TH ST

SW 9TH ST

NE 5TH AVE

NE 5TH TER

SW 24TH AVE

SW 44TH AVE

NE 63RD CT

NW 62ND ST

SW 19TH ST

NE 1ST AVE

NE 22ND TER

SW 10TH ST

NW 43RD AVE

NW 30TH TER

NW 15TH ST

NW 9TH TER

NW 69TH ST

NW 43RD AVE

NW 29TH TER

SW 43RD ST

SW 24TH AVE

NE 17TH AVE

NW 53RD ST

NW 35TH ST

NE 51ST CT

NE 7TH AVE

NE 28TH AVE

NE 48TH CT

NW 36TH ST

NW 30TH AVE

NE 52ND ST

SE 12TH ST

NW 26TH AVE

NE 24TH ST

NW 36TH AVE

SW 13TH ST

NE 20TH TER

NE 30TH ST

NE 40TH ST

NE 18TH AVE

NW 9TH CT

NE 40TH CT

NW 16TH ST

NW 33RD AVE

SW 17TH AVE

NE 17TH AVE

SW 22ND ST

I 595 RAMP

NW 24TH ST

SW 18TH ST

SW 28TH AVE

NW 7TH ST

SW 11TH ST

NE 57TH CT

NE 45TH ST

NW 10TH AVE

NW 17TH AVE

NE 17TH TER

NE 15TH TER

NE 19TH ST

NE 43RD CT

NW 10TH CT

SW 16TH ST

NW 63RD ST

SW 32ND ST

SE 16TH ST

NW 18TH AVE

NW 38TH AVE

NW 6TH AVE

NW 39TH ST

SW 6TH ST

SW 8TH ST

NE 21ST TER

NW 32ND AVE

NE 2ND AVE

SW 4TH AVE

NE 28TH AVE

NE 40TH ST

NE 21ST ST

NE 26TH ST

NE 7TH ST

NW 15TH AVE

NE 17TH AVE

NE 5TH TER

NE 15TH AVE

NW 16TH AVE

SW 25TH ST

SW 1ST ST

SW 2ND AVE

NW 44TH ST

NE 15TH TER

SW 23RD AVE

NE 6TH TER

NW 34TH TER

SW 4TH CT

NW 27TH AVE

SW 10TH CT

NW 2ND AVE

SW 9TH TER

SW 26TH AVE

I 595 RAMP

NE 5TH TER

SW 16TH ST

NW 9TH CT

SW 14TH AVE

SW 22ND CT

NE 8TH AVE

NE 22ND ST

NW 35TH WAY

NE 19TH AVE

SW 5TH CT

NW 17TH TER

SW 4TH CT

NE 9TH AVE

SW 21ST TER

NE 19TH AVE

NW 4TH CT

VISTAMAR ST

NW 32ND AVE

NE 7TH TER

SW 2ND AVE

ACCESS RD

NE 59TH CT

NW 21ST ST

NW 32ND TER

SE 3RD AVE

NW 36TH CT

NW 51ST ST

NW 46TH ST

NW 30TH CT

NW 32ND ST

SW 36TH AVE

SERVICE RD

SW 4TH CT

NW 53RD ST

NE 41ST ST

NE 33RD ST

NE 27TH AVE

NE 59TH CT

NE 21ST DR

SW 22ND ST

NW 30TH TER

NW 32ND AVE

NW 27TH TER

NW 19TH AVE

NE 14TH WAY

SW 8TH ST

NW 7TH AVE

NE 57TH ST

NE 43RD ST

NE 47TH CT

NW 24TH ST

HARBOR DR

NE 25TH ST

NW 31ST WAY

SW 10TH ST

SE 1ST ST

NW 4TH ST

NW 23RD ST

NW 12TH AVE

NE 17TH TER NE 17TH AVE

NE 57TH ST

SW 22ND ST

NW 14TH ST

NE 49TH ST

I 595 RAMP

NW 28TH AVE

NW 3RD AVE

NW 52ND PL

N FEDERAL HWY

NE 26TH CT

NE 34TH ST

ARPEIKA ST

NE 11TH AVE

NE 51ST ST

NW 47TH CT

NE 11TH ST

I95 RAMP

NE 49TH ST

NW 7TH ST

SW 9TH ST

NW 26TH AVE

I95 RAMP

SW 22ND AVE

NW 11TH AVE

NW 17TH ST

NE 19TH AVE

E NEW RIVER WWY

NW 3RD CT

NE 14TH AVE

ACCESS RD

NE 23RD ST

NE 15TH CT

NW 23RD ST

NW 28TH AVE

NW 26TH TER

NE 12TH ST

NE 18TH AVE

NW 25TH AVE

NW 13TH ST

NW 6TH CT

NW 43RD TER

NE 6TH AVE

NE 51ST ST

NW 6TH TER

NE 40TH CT

SW 32ND ST

NW 6TH PL

SW 16TH CT

NW 42ND ST

SW 21ST ST

NE 17TH WAY

NE 56TH PL

NE 48TH CT

NE 57TH ST

NE 33RD ST

SW 24TH ST

NW 20TH AVE

NE 6TH TER

NW 27TH ST

NW 42ND TER

NW 36TH TER

NE 42ND CT

SW 15TH TER

NE 17TH AVE

NE 49TH ST

NW 23RD AVE

NE 33RD ST

NW 29TH WAY

NW 7TH CT

NE 29TH ST

SW 30TH AVE

SW 42ND TER

NE 39TH ST

NW 17TH AVE

NW 40TH ST

SE 5TH AVE

NW 28TH TER

NE 11TH AVE

NE 16TH TER

NE 41ST ST

NE 34TH ST

NW 21ST AVE

NW 25TH TER

NE 19TH AVE

NE 3RD AVE

NW 36TH TER

NW 34TH TER

NE 42ND ST

NW 28TH WAY

NW 42ND ST

NW 8TH TER

NW 13TH CT

NW 29TH ST

NW 33RD TER

NW 5TH ST

NW 24TH AVE

SW 9TH ST

NE 9TH ST

NE 17TH TER

SW 5TH ST

NE 5TH AVE

NE 14TH ST

NW 26TH TER

NE 58TH ST

NW 30TH AVE

NW 32ND TER

SW 13TH ST

SW 26TH TER

SW 12TH CT

NE 40TH ST

NE 18TH TER

NE 1ST AVE

NW 23RD TER

SW 2ND CT

NW 8TH ST

NW 29TH TER

SW 8TH AVE

SW 1ST AVE

NE 32ND AVE

NE 28TH ST

SW 28TH ST

NW 8TH PL

NE 57TH CT

NW 52ND ST

NE 46TH ST

SE 14TH AVE

NE 17TH AVE

SW 18TH TER

NW 28TH AVE

NW 27TH ST

SE 7TH ST

NW 37TH AVE

NE 20TH AVE

SW 25TH AVE

NE 47TH ST

NE 45TH ST

NW 20TH TER

NW 8TH AVE

SE 2ND AVE

NW 29TH CT

SW 23RD ST

SW 37TH TER

NE 59TH ST

SW 16TH ST

SW 43RD ST

SW 15TH AVE

SW 22ND ST

SW 10TH ST

NW 43RD AVE

NW 18TH ST

SW 30TH PL

NW 21ST AVE

NW 19TH AVE

NW 55TH ST

SW 28TH AVE

NW 28TH TER

NW 15TH WAY

NW 10TH PL

NE 47TH ST

SW 12TH PL

NW 35TH TER

NE 48TH CT

NE 17TH WAY

NW 45TH ST

SW 26TH ST

NW 5TH ST

I95 RAMP

SW 21ST CT

NE 48TH ST

NE 9TH AVE

NW 57TH ST

SW 2ND ST

NW 48TH ST

NE 17TH TER

NE 48TH ST

NW 12TH AVE

NW 3RD AVE

NE 65TH CT

NE 5TH AVE

NW 5TH ST

NW 10TH AVE

SW 13TH ST

NE 17TH CT

COCONUT DR

NE 22ND ST

NW 23RD AVE

NW 39TH TER

NW 56TH ST

NW 25TH AVE

SW 46TH AVE

NW 33RD ST

NW 36TH AVE

NW 30TH WAY

NE 57TH ST

NE 6TH AVE

NW 32ND CT

NE 32ND ST

NE 10TH AVE

NW 9TH ST

NW 3RD CT

NW 17TH AVE

NE 47TH CT

SW 11TH CT

SE 15TH AVE

NW 23RD CT

NW 8TH CT

NW 69TH CT

NE 8TH AVE

NE 39TH ST

NW 19TH AVE

NW 4TH ST

NE 7TH AVE

SE 10TH AVE

NW 45TH AVE

NW 16TH AVE

NW 4TH PL

NE 52ND ST

SW 30TH ST

NW 44TH AVE

NW 29TH TER

SW 32ND ST

NE 63RD ST

SW 3RD AVE

NW 30TH AVE

NE 15TH AVE

NW 43RD AVE

SW 12TH TER

NW 13TH ST

NW 36TH WAY

NE 19TH AVE

NW 13TH CT

NW 3RD AVE

NW 8TH ST

NW 35TH WAY

NW 30TH WAY

NW 23RD ST

NW 15TH AVE

NE 8TH ST

NW 22ND AVE

SW 11TH ST

EL PRADO AVE

SW 11TH ST

SW 23RD CT

NE 17TH TER

SW 20TH ST

SW 16TH CT

NW 18TH TER

NW 20TH ST

NW 43RD AVE

NW 26TH ST

SW 38TH AVE

NW 36TH ST

SW FLAGLER AVE

NW 10TH TER

NE 55TH CT

NW 27TH ST

NE 12TH AVE

NW 10TH AVE

SW 12TH CT

SW 12TH AVE

NE 57TH ST

NE 51ST CT

SW 5TH ST

NE 3RD AVE

NE 14TH TER

NE 26TH DR

SW 25TH TER

NW 30TH ST

SW 34TH AVE

SE 8TH ST

NW 14TH CT

NW 35TH TER

NE 8TH ST

NE 40TH CT

NE 9TH AVE

NE 36TH ST

NE 17TH ST

SW 4TH PL

NW 34TH AVE

SW 19TH ST

NW 42ND ST

NE 21ST CT

SW 28TH TER

S I95 NB

NE 15TH TER

SW 37TH AVE

SW 8TH AVE

NW 3RD AVE

NW 22ND ST

NW 9TH TER

NW 27TH AVE

NE 6TH TER

NW 2ND AVE

NE 33RD CT

NE 22ND TER

NE 27TH AVE

SOMERSET DR

NE 7TH AVE

NE 65TH ST

SW 13TH CT

SW 26TH TER

NE 19TH TER

NW 36TH AVE

NE 49TH ST

NW 24TH AVE

NE 40TH ST

SE 20TH ST

NE 59TH ST

NW 16TH WAY

NW 41ST AVE

NE 40TH CT

I95 RAMP

SW 17TH ST

NE 18TH TER

EUCLID DR

NE 17TH TER

NE 57TH ST

NW 30TH AVE

NE 48TH CT

NW 44TH TER

SW 1ST ST

I95 RAMP

SW 27TH TER

NE 22ND AVE

SW 15TH ST

SW 22ND ST

SW 38TH AVE

NE 9TH ST

SW 18TH AVE

NE 3RD TER

NW 69TH CT

NW 3RD AVE

NW 28TH ST

SW 38TH AVE

NW 36TH TER

NE 17TH CT

I 595 RAMP

NW 15TH PL

NW 27TH ST

NW 17TH WAY

NE 22ND ST

NE 44TH ST

NE 10TH AVE

NW 29TH TER

NE 65TH CT

I 595 RAMP

NW 29TH ST

NW 23RD AVE

NW 55TH CT

NW 10TH PL

NE 46TH ST

NE 40TH CT

SW 37TH AVE

NE 28TH DR

NE 20TH AVE

NW 20TH AVE

NW 17TH ST

NE 30TH ST

SW 3RD ST

NW 15TH AVE

NW 45TH AVE

NE 58TH ST

NE 2ND TER

NW 55TH ST

W LAS OLAS BLVD

NW 8TH AVE

NE 5TH TER

NW 15TH ST

NE 16TH ST

NE 55TH ST

CORDOVA RD

NE 20TH AVE

NW 17TH TER

NW 34TH TER

GRACE DR

SW 9TH AVE

NW 33RD TER

NE 21ST CT

NW 37TH ST

NW 36TH TER

NW 9TH CT

NE 27TH TER

NW 35TH CT

NW 32ND TER

NW 34TH ST

NE 8TH AVE

SW 2ND AVE

NE 7TH AVE

NW 25TH TER

NW 43RD TER

NE 37TH ST

NE 47TH CT

1ST AVE

NW 18TH AVE

NW 28TH ST

NW 30TH CT

NE 53RD ST

NE 13TH CT

NW 16TH AVE

NW 11TH AVE

SW 23RD ST

NW 42ND TER

SW 21ST CT

NW 23RD TER

SW 29TH AVE

NW 3RD ST

NW 44TH AVE

NW 34TH TER

NE 3RD TER

SW 9TH ST

NW 14TH AVE

NW 16TH ST

NE 56TH CT

SW 35TH TER

NW 23RD TER

NE 12TH AVE

NW 20TH CT

NW 40TH ST

NE 23RD ST

NW 33RD AVE

NE 17TH AVE

SW 30TH TER

NW 49TH ST

SW 22ND ST

NW 28TH AVE

NE 4TH AVE

NW 34TH AVE

NW 40TH ST

NW 38TH AVE

NW 43RD TER

SW 18TH CT

NW 35TH AVE

NW 32ND AVE

SW 20TH ST

NW 44TH AVE

NW 8TH CT

NW 36TH ST

SW 29TH TER

NW 13TH AVE

NE 12TH TER

NE 56TH CT

NE 59TH ST

NW 35TH AVE

NE 39TH ST

SW 34TH CT

NW 32ND WAY

SW 25TH ST

NW 53RD CT

NE 16TH ST

NW 15TH CT

NE 14TH AVE

THE PINES

NW 22ND ST

NW 13TH ST

NE 21ST DR

ELLER DR

SW 20TH ST

N ICW

WWY

SW 32ND CT

NW 17TH TER

SE 25TH ST

SE 5TH AVE

SW 38TH AVE

NW 3RD ST

NE 8TH AVE

NE 3RD AVE

NW 16TH AVE

NE 22ND WAY

SW 8TH AVE

NW 2ND AVE

N US 1

SW 2ND ST

NW 51ST CT

NW 53RD ST

NE 14TH PL

NW 13TH AVE

SLOCUM ST

NE 1ST AVE

NE 19TH ST

NE 35TH ST

NE 20TH ST

NW 21ST ST

NE 21ST TER

NW 8TH CT

NW 4TH ST

NE 19TH AVE

NW 34TH AVE

NW 27TH ST

SERVICE RD

NW 27TH AVE

NW 12TH AVE

NW 36TH TER

NW 12TH CT

NW 29TH AVE

NE 25TH ST

NW 18TH CT

SE 28TH ST

NW 29TH CT

NW 3RD ST

NW 15TH PL

9I 5 RAMP

NW 3RD ST

SW 13TH CT

NE 1ST AVE

NW 18TH AVE

I95 RAMP

NW 24TH ST

NE 13TH AVE

SE 5TH ST

NW 29TH AVE

NE 16TH TER

NW 27TH AVE

NW 46TH ST

N OCEAN BLVD

NW 30TH AVE

NW 29TH AVE

NE 47TH ST

S I95 SB

NW 34TH TER

NE 1ST AVE

NE 55TH CT

NE 27TH DR

SW 13TH AVE

NW 15TH WAY

SW 22ND AVE

NW 30TH AVE

NW 9TH ST

NE 17TH WAY

SW 9TH AVE

NW 18TH CT

NE 3RD AVE

NE 43RD ST

HICKORY ST

NW 16TH ST

NW 18TH AVE

NW 38TH AVE

NW 28TH ST

NW 15TH ST

NW 6TH CT

SW 14TH ST

NE 6TH AVE

NW 20TH AVE

NE 58TH ST

SW 41ST CT

SW 4TH ST

SW 27TH ST

NE 42ND ST

NE 15TH AVE

NW 48TH ST

NW 11TH CT

SW 18TH ST

SW 3RD AVE

SW 39TH ST

SE 2ND ST

NW 23RD WAY

SW 28TH AVE

SW 27TH ST

NW 45TH AVE

NW 38TH AVE

NW 8TH CT

NW 17TH ST

NW 4TH PL

NW 54TH ST

NW 6TH AVE

SW 3RD AVE

NW 52ND CT

SW 2ND ST

NE 17TH AVE

NE 8TH AVE

NE 9TH AVE

NW 14TH TER

NW 39TH AVE

NE 29TH AVE

NW 25TH ST

NW 43RD ST

NE 18TH AVE

NE 13TH AVE

NE 62ND CT

NW 22ND AVE

NE 40TH ST

SW 14TH AVE

NW 15TH TER

SW 23RD ST

NW 19TH CT

NE 15TH AVE

NW 1ST AVE

NW 28TH CT

NE 27TH DR

NW 8TH AVE

SW 23RD ST

NW 27TH WAY

NW 7TH CT

SE 6TH CT

NE 15TH TER

MARINA BLVD

NE 25TH ST

NW 36TH TER

NW 30TH TER

SW 21ST ST

NE 17TH AVE

NE 14TH AVE

NW 45TH ST

NE 27TH DR

SW 23RD TER

NW 33RD ST

NE 24TH ST

NW 33RD TER

NW 43RD AVE

NW 34TH TER

SW 18TH CT

SW 13TH ST

NE 23RD ST

SE 9TH AVE

NE 16TH TER

NE 28TH ST

NE 16TH AVE

NW 45TH ST

SW 43RD WAY

SW 26TH AVE

SE 14TH ST

NE 10TH AVE

NW 26TH ST

NW 33RD WAY

SW 41ST ST

SE 16TH ST

SW 10TH ST

NE 7TH TER

NE 61ST ST

NW 64TH ST

SW 12TH ST

NE 26TH AVE

NW 37TH TER

NW 17TH ST

NW 2ND ST

SW 32ND CT

NE 20TH ST

NW 45TH CT

NW 25TH ST

NE 15TH ST

NW 12TH TER

NE 16TH TER

NE 12TH ST

SW 25TH AVE

NE 43RD CT

NW 4TH CT

NE 30TH ST

NW 21ST TER

NE 49TH ST

SW 2ND AVE

SW 22ND TER

NE 17TH WAY

SE 18TH ST

NW 28TH TER

SW 14TH ST

NE 37TH ST

NW 27TH ST

NW 8TH CT

NE 57TH ST

SW 20TH ST

NE 55TH ST

SW 5TH ST

SW 11TH ST

NE 55TH ST

NE 46TH ST

SW 11TH ST

SW 30TH AVE

NW 24TH ST

SW 1ST ST

NW 22ND ST

NW 28TH AVE

NW 42ND AVE

NW 69TH CT

SW 18TH ST

NW 38TH TER

SW 37TH AVE

NW 27TH AVE

SW 21ST TER

SE 1ST AVE

NW 33RD ST

NW 23RD AVE

NW 43RD TER

NW 5TH CT

SE 32ND ST

NW 8TH ST

NE 42ND ST

NW 19TH AVE

NW 29TH AVE

NE 7TH AVE

NW 7TH ST

NE 8TH TER

SW 24TH ST

SW 22ND ST

I95 RAMP

NW 15TH CT

NE 21ST ST

NW 10TH AVE

NE 16TH ST

S I95 NB

NW 38TH TER

NW 52ND CT

SW 14TH ST

NE 32ND AVE

NW 24TH AVE

NW 23RD CT

NE 13TH AVE

SW 2ND AVE

NW 4TH CT

NW 7TH AVE

NE 43RD ST

SW 46TH AVE

NE 11TH AVE

NW 12TH TER

NW 30TH TER

NE 32ND ST

ACCESS RD

SW 28TH WAY

NE 47TH ST

NE 54TH ST

NW 3RD AVE

NE 12TH TER

NE 6TH CT

NE 57TH ST

NW 52ND CT

NW 35TH TER

NW 2ND ST

SW 36TH AVE

NW 17TH ST

NW 35TH TER

SW 10TH AVE

PROGRESSO DR

NE 33RD ST

NW 19TH AVE

SW 24TH ST

NW 33RD AVE

NW 45TH AVE

NW 39TH AVE

NW 12TH AVE

SE 13TH ST

NE 33RD ST

NW 26TH AVE

NE 13TH ST

NW 18TH ST

NE 4TH AVE

NE 17TH AVE

NW 41ST ST

I95 RAMP

SW 12TH AVE

SW 13TH AVE

SE 18TH ST

NE 26TH CT

NW 28TH CT

NW 43RD ST

SW 1ST AVE

SW 16TH ST

NW 3RD ST

NE 20TH ST

SW 23RD TER

NW 14TH AVE

NE 46TH ST

NE 17TH AVE

SW 2ND CT

SW 15TH CT

SE 21ST ST

NW 36TH AVE

NW 12TH CT

NE 17TH RD

N VICTORIA PARK RD

NW 11TH AVE

NE 56TH CT

NW 18TH AVE

NW 12TH ST

NE 2ND TER

I 595 RAMP

NE 25TH ST

NE 7TH AVE

OAK ST

SW 15TH CT

NW 28TH WAY

NW 9TH ST

NE 13TH TER

SW 22ND TER

NE 9TH AVE

NE 37TH ST

NW 10TH AVE

SLOCUM ST

NW 8TH AVE

FLORIDA TPK RAMP

NE 17TH TER

SW 11TH CT

NE 17TH TER

NE 20TH CT

SW 5TH PL

NE 5TH TER

SW 34TH AVE

I95 RAMP

NW 39TH ST

I595

NE 58TH ST

NW 18TH ST

SW 18TH AVE

NE 17TH TER

NW 7TH ST

NE 57TH ST

NW 69TH ST

NW 18TH AVE

NE 35TH CT

NW 20TH ST

SW 42ND TER

NE 15TH ST

NE 24TH ST

NW 1ST ST

NW 51ST PL

NW 40TH ST

SW 28TH WAY

NW 24TH CT NE 16TH AVE NE 16TH AVE

NW 45TH CT

SW 24TH AVE

NE 21ST LN

ACCESS RD

NW 10TH TER

NW 30TH AVE

SW 14TH TER

NW 11TH ST

NE 27TH AVE

NW 43RD PL

SE 15TH ST

SW 14TH TER

SE 18TH AVE

NW 45TH AVE

SW 4TH CT

NW 6TH CT

NW 43RD ST

NE 12TH AVE

NE 51ST CT

NW 13TH ST

NE 27TH ST

NE 51ST CT

NE 10TH AVE

SE 28TH ST

SW 34TH CT

NW 21ST ST

SW 11TH ST

NW 17TH CT

NW 27TH WAY

NE 16TH TER

NW 23RD AVE

NE 13TH AVE

NW 32ND AVE

NE 17TH AVE

NW 7TH AVE

SW 30TH AVE

NW 1ST CT

NE 17TH AVE

N OCEAN DR

NE 12TH AVE

NE 16TH AVE NE 15TH ST

NE 32ND ST

SW 43RD AVE

NW 28TH ST

NW 44TH AVE

NW 31ST TER

SW 21ST ST

NW 30TH ST

NW 29TH TER

SE 18TH AVE

NW 35TH AVE

NW 6TH AVE

NW 9TH ST

SW 32ND CT

NW 41ST TER

NW 17TH AVE

SW 12TH PL

NE 8TH ST

NE 47TH ST

NE 27TH DR

SW 21ST ST

SE 15TH ST

NE 40TH CT

NE 51ST ST

SW 4TH ST

NW 43RD AVE

SW 34TH ST

NE 5TH AVE

SW 43RD AVE

NE 22ND ST

NW 25TH AVE

NE 63RD ST

NW 14TH ST

SW 2ND ST

NE 13TH AVE

NW 12TH ST

NW 27TH ST

SW 13TH CT

NE 17TH AVE

NW 16TH AVE

SW 2ND CT

NW 2ND ST

NW 5TH AVE SW 13TH ST

NE 25TH CT

NE 24TH AVE

NW 28TH AVE

SW 32ND ST

NE 43RD ST

NW 57TH CT

COCONUT DR

NW 27TH AVE

NE 2ND AVE

NW 43RD AVE

NW 41ST ST

NE 8TH AVE

NW 14TH AVE

NW 24TH ST

NE 14TH AVE

SW 17TH ST

SW 25TH ST

NW 53RD ST

SW 33RD ST

NE 6TH TER

NE 9TH ST

NW 12TH CT

NW 33RD TER

NW 47TH ST

NW 42ND AVE

SE 11TH ST

NE 17TH CT

NE 47TH ST

SE 14TH ST

NW 6TH AVE

SW 24TH ST

I95 RAMP

NW 49TH ST

NE 24TH CT

NW 6TH PL

SW 42ND TER

NE 45TH ST

NE 22ND WAY

NW 34TH AVE

SW 17TH AVE

NW 5TH ST

NW 26TH WAY

NW 35TH AVE

SW 14TH CT

SW 5TH CT

NE 17TH AVE

SW 5TH PL

SW 30TH TER

SE 8TH ST

NE 48TH CT

SW 7TH ST

SE 4TH AVE

I95 RAMP

SW 9TH ST

NE 8TH AVE

SW 15TH ST

SW 33RD CT

NW 56TH ST

SW 11TH CT

NE 40TH CT

NE 21ST DR

SW 26TH AVE

NW 17TH AVE

NW 45TH ST

NE 27TH AVE

NE 20TH ST

NW 56TH ST

NE 36TH ST

NW 30TH TER

SW 2ND AVE

NE 8TH AVE

NW 51ST ST

NW 5TH AVE

NE 47TH ST

NW 11TH PL

SW 19TH ST

NE 17TH WAY

NE 56TH CT

SW 38TH AVE

SW 16TH TER

NW 32ND ST

NW 23RD CT

NW 33RD ST

NW 22ND ST

NE 34TH ST

PROGRESSO DR

SE 13TH ST

NE 60TH ST

SW 23RD ST

NW 6TH ST

NE 40TH ST

NW 15TH ST

SW 18TH AVE

NE 41ST ST

NW 46TH ST

SW 21ST AVE

NW 10TH TER

NW 7TH PL

NE 17TH CT

SW 44TH AVE

NE 18TH ST

SW 8TH ST

NE 28TH ST

SW 10TH ST

NE 17TH ST

SW 33RD ST

SW 42ND AVE

NW 35TH AVE

SW 8TH AVE

SW 18TH AVE

NW 19TH AVE

NW 8TH ST

SW 12TH ST

SW 23RD CT

NW 14TH ST

NW 38TH TER

SE 15TH AVE

NW 18TH ST

NW 6TH PL

S INTRACOASTAL WWY

ACCESS RD

SW 20TH ST

NW 26TH ST

I 595 RAMP

SW 18TH ST

NE 15TH AVE

SW 15TH ST

NE 43RD CT

NW 27TH AVE

NE 9TH AVE

SW 21ST ST

NW 47TH ST

SW 20TH AVE

SW 44TH TER

NE 39TH ST

NW 40TH CT

NW 10TH AVE

NE 40TH CT

NE 36TH CT

NE 56TH CT

NW 26TH WAY

SW 5TH AVE

ACCESS RD

SW 18TH ST

NW 43RD CT

SE 12TH CT

NW 1ST AVE

SW 29TH TER

SE 2ND AVE

NE FLAGLER DR

NW 21ST CT

NW 34TH AVE

NW 9TH PL

NW 21ST ST

NE 20TH AVE

SW 26TH ST

SW 3RD ST

NW 29TH TER

NE 59TH PL

NE 9TH AVE

NW 29TH AVE

SW 19TH ST

NE 57TH ST

NW 23RD AVE

SW 7TH ST

NW 9TH CT

NE 19TH TER

NW 37TH TER

SW 12TH AVE

NW 6TH ST

NE 21ST AVE

NE 21ST ST

SW 28TH TER

NW 15TH WAY

NW 25TH AVE

NW 9TH PL

NW 4TH CT

SW 23RD ST

I95 RAMP

NE 59TH ST

SW 30TH AVE

NW 40TH ST

NW 4TH ST

SW 33RD ST

SE 36TH ST

N INTRACOASTAL W

WY

NW 26TH ST

NE 1ST AVE

NW 65TH ST

NW 5TH ST

NE 56TH CT

SW 35TH AVE

NW 42ND ST

NW 28TH AVE

NW 43RD AVE

NE 60TH ST

NW 29TH ST

NW 34TH ST

NE 53RD CT

I 595 RAMP

NE 59TH CT

NE 45TH CT

NW 11TH TER

SE 11TH ST

SW 15TH ST

NW 43RD ST

SW 26TH AVE

SE 23RD ST

NE 3RD AVE

NE 15TH AVE

NE 3RD TER

NW 13TH TER

SE 2ND ST

SW 18TH ST

NE 21ST ST

NW 23RD ST

NE 24TH CT

NW 54TH ST

NW 15TH ST

NE 17TH TER

SW 4TH ST

NE 11TH AVE

NE 18TH TER

NW 8TH ST

NE 10TH AVE

NE 20TH AVE

NW 9TH ST

NW 34TH AVE

NE 18TH ST

SW 14TH AVE

NE 30TH CT

NE 28TH ST

NW 8TH PL

NE 48TH ST

NW 52ND ST

NW 10TH TER

NW 10TH TER

SW 29TH ST

SW 2ND ST

NE 16TH AVE

NW 15TH CT

NW 30TH AVE

SW 13TH AVE

SW 14TH CT

NW 44TH AVE

NE 1ST AVE

NE 40TH ST

NW 66TH ST

NW 32ND CT

NW 38TH TER

NW 65TH ST

NE 40TH CT

NE 24TH ST

NE 35TH ST

NE 8TH ST

SE 16TH ST

SW 19TH ST

NW 7TH CT

NW 4TH CT

NW 37TH ST

NW 18TH ST

NW 36TH AVE

NE 23RD AVE

SW 23RD CT

NW 57TH ST

SE 24TH ST

W LAS OLAS BLVD

NW 21ST ST

NW 3RD AVE

NW 25TH AVE

NW 48TH ST

COVE LAKE RD

NE 32ND ST

NE 22ND AVE

NE FLAGLER DR

NE 33RD CT

SW 17TH ST

NW 55TH CT

NE 8TH AVE

SW 24TH ST

SW 28TH AVE

NW 1ST CT

SE 26TH ST

HAVANA DR

SW 32ND ST

NW 16TH TER

NW 1ST ST

NW 24TH AVE

NW 35TH TER

NE 1ST TER

NE 3RD AVE

NW 46TH ST

NW 26TH ST

NE 1ST TER

NW 33RD WAY

NW 53RD ST

NE 11TH AVE

NW 38TH AVE

NW 35TH ST

SW 10TH AVE

NE 9TH AVE

NW 43RD ST

SW 12TH CT

SW 10TH ST

SW 23RD ST

I95 RAMP

SW 16TH CT

NW 14TH ST

NW 41ST AVE

PALM AVE

SW 9TH ST

NW 15TH AVE

NW 38TH AVE

NE 58TH ST

SW 9TH ST

NE 29TH CT

FEDERAL HWY RAMP

NE 19TH ST

NE 3RD AVE

NW 28TH WAY

NE 3RD AVE

NE 20TH AVE

NE 27TH ST

SW 34TH AVE

SW 22ND AVE

NE 5TH TER

NW 29TH CT

NE 16TH ST

NW 26TH AVE

SW 27TH TER

NW 56TH ST

NE 28TH ST

SW 23RD ST

NW 25TH WAY

NW 27TH AVE

SW 24TH CT

SW 23RD ST

SW 38TH TER

NW 27TH WAY

NE 33RD AVE

SW 27TH TER

NE 38TH ST

NW 39TH ST

NW 9TH ST

SW 16TH ST

NW 13TH AVE

NE 9TH AVE

NE 7TH TER

NW 19TH TER

NE 18TH AVE

NW 23RD ST

SW 34TH ST

NW 43RD TER

NE 32ND AVE

NW 28TH AVE

NW 21ST TER

NE 3RD AVE

NW 5TH PL

NW 5TH AVE

N US1

NW 5TH CT

NE 18TH TER

SW 13TH ST

NW 36TH WAY

NW 32ND CT

NW 16TH ST

NW 24TH ST

NE 27TH ST

NE 19TH AVE

NW 23RD ST

NW 33RD TER

NW 44TH TER

NE 39TH ST

SW 25TH AVE

NW 29TH TER

SW 30TH ST

SW 22ND CT

SW 46TH AVE

NW 13TH AVE

NW 42ND ST

NE 19TH AVE

FLORIDA TPKE

NE 25TH ST

NW 17TH ST

NW 16TH TER

NE 40TH CT

SW 4TH PL

NW 12TH ST

SW 36TH TER

SW 24TH AVE

NE 9TH TER

NE 7TH AVE

NE 39TH ST

NE 3RD AVE

NW 5TH CT

NE 7TH AVE

NE 16TH PL

NW 27TH WAY

NW 18TH AVE

NE 36TH ST

SW 7TH ST

SIDNEY LN

SW 14TH ST

SERV CI E RD

SW 28TH WAY

NE 16TH CT

SW 29TH ST

NW 68TH CT

NE 3RD AVE

SW 28TH TER

NE 15TH ST

SW 34TH TER

SE 32ND ST

NE 38TH ST

NE 20TH TER

NE 29TH ST

NW 20TH AVE

NE 15TH TER

NE 22ND AVE

NW 19TH AVE

NW 31ST WAY

I95 RAMP

NE 44TH CT

NW 21ST ST

SW 44TH AVE

NW 42ND TER

NW 3RD CT

SW 21ST ST

SE 10TH AVE

SW 4TH CT

NE 20TH AVE

SW 22ND TER

NW 33RD AVE

NE 6TH TER

NW 33RD ST

NE 2ND AVE

NE 41ST ST

NE 34TH CT

NE 55TH ST

NW 53RD CT

NW 36TH AVE

N FED HWY

SW 9TH TER

NW 2ND ST

NW 24TH TER

NW 39TH AVE

NW 8TH PL

NW 28TH TER

SW 19TH AVE

SW 24TH AVE

NW 42ND AVE

NE 6TH CT

NW 17TH ST

NW 40TH CT

SW 29TH AVE

I95 RAMP

NW 23RD TER

NW 3RD CT

NW 9TH PL

NE 2ND TER

NW 4TH AVE

SW 34TH TER

I 595 RAMP

NW 37TH AVE

NE 26TH AVE

NE 27TH ST

SW 14TH AVE

SW 10TH AVE

NE 25TH AVE

NW 34TH WAY

NE 16TH AVE

NE 37TH ST

NE 1ST ST

SW 6TH AVE

NW 44TH TER

NE 15TH AVE

SW 22ND TER

NE 42ND CT

NW 41ST ST

NW 29TH AVE

NW 18TH PL

NW 21ST TER

THE PINES

NW 25TH ST

NW 10TH TER

NE 28TH AVE

NW 18TH AVE

NE 58TH CT

NW 13TH CT

NW 11TH TER

SE 23RD AVE

NW 21ST ST

NE 25TH ST

NW 29TH TER

NE 12TH TER

NW 12TH AVE

NE 65TH ST

NW 17TH TER

SE 22ND ST SE 21ST ST

NW 30TH TER

SW 11TH CT

NW 4TH ST

NW 37TH ST

SW 2ND ST

SW 6TH ST

SW 42ND AVE

NE 35TH ST

NW 33RD TER

NE 20TH ST

NW 45TH AVE

SW 29TH AVE

E PERIMETER RD

SW 22ND AVE

SW 23RD CT

SW 6TH ST

SE 13TH ST

NW 15TH PL

SE 1ST AVE

NW 7TH CT

NE 12TH TER

NE 5TH AVE

SW 21ST ST

ACCESS RD

SW 22ND ST

NW 42ND ST

SW 22ND CT

NW 53RD ST

NE 37TH ST

NE 35TH ST

SW 8TH ST

NW 18TH CT

NW 26TH AVE

NW 43RD ST

NE 55TH CT

NW 8TH AVE

SW 6TH AVE

NE 19TH AVE

NE 4TH AVE

NE 7TH AVE

NW 8TH CT

NE 28TH AVE

NE 8TH AVE

NW 33RD AVE

NW 6TH CT

NW 14TH CT

NE 5TH AVE

NE 30TH PL

NE 46TH CT

SW 14TH AVE

NE 17TH AVE

SW 15TH ST

NW 52ND ST

NW 7TH CT

NE 26TH AVE

NW 18TH CT

NE 14TH ST

NW 1ST ST

NW 15TH ST

NE 22ND AVE

NE 21ST RD

SW 39TH ST

NW 5TH AVE

NW 28TH TER

NE 10TH AVE

NW 11TH AVE

NW 33RD AVE

SW 31ST ST

NW 46TH ST

NW 36TH AVE

NW 56TH ST

NW 34TH ST

NW 30TH ST

NE 56TH CT

NE 2ND AVE

NE 12TH TER

SW 6TH ST

NW 34TH TER

NW 3RD AVE

NW 6TH CT

NE 42ND ST

NW 53RD ST

NW 14TH CT

NW 34TH WAY

NE 21ST CT

NW 2ND ST

SW 41ST AVE

SW 32ND CT

NW 21ST ST

SE 16TH ST

NE 34TH ST

NE 40TH PL

NE 17TH TER

NW 13TH ST

NW 44TH ST

SW 3RD AVE

NE 2ND AVE

NE 45TH ST

NW 31ST WAY

NW 2ND ST

NW 5TH ST

SW 6TH CT

NE 26TH CT

NW 7TH ST

NE 15TH AVE

SW 11TH CT

NW 3RD AVE

SW 32ND ST

NW 25TH TER

SW 25TH ST

NW 48TH ST

SE 4TH AVE

NE 23RD AVE

SW 1ST ST

NE 49TH ST

NW 33RD WAY

NW 11TH AVE

SW 19TH ST

NW 54TH ST

NW 46TH CT

SW 28TH TER

NE 26TH AVE

NE 18TH AVE

NE 27TH ST

NW 13TH AVE

NE 36TH ST

NE 3RD AVE

OAK ST

SE 4TH ST

NW 13TH ST

SW 9TH ST

NW 29TH ST

NE 10TH AVE

SW 38TH AVE

SE 25TH AVE

NW 4TH ST

SW 25TH AVE

NE 15TH WAY

NW 11TH ST

NW 5TH AVE

SW 30TH ST

NE 15TH AVE

NE 26TH AVE

NE 57TH CT

SW 2ND CT

NW 7TH ST

SW 7TH AVE

NE 60TH ST

N V CI TOR AI PARK RD

NW 22ND CT

SW 15TH AVE

NW 22ND AVE

SW 43RD TER

SW 3RD ST

NW 33RD CT

NE 21ST LN

NE 64TH ST

NW 38TH TER

NE 17TH TER

NW 24TH AVE

SW 12TH AVE

SW 14TH ST

NE 16TH CT

NE 63RD ST

SE 14TH ST

NE 5TH TER

SE 11TH CT

NW 6TH ST

NW 11TH PL

NW 3RD ST

NE 5TH TER

NE 16TH AVE

NE 15TH AVE

I95 RAMP

NW 6TH CT

NW 32ND TER

NW 12TH TER

NW 38TH TER

NE 14TH TER

NE 1ST AVE

NE 21ST WAY

SW 25TH TER

NW 6TH AVE

NW 11TH ST

SW 21ST ST

NE 2ND AVE

NE 35TH ST

SW 22ND AVE

SW 44TH AVE

SW 15TH TER

NW 25TH ST

NW 17TH ST

SW 29TH AVE

NE 5TH AVE

SE 1ST AVE

NW 14TH AVE

NW 13TH CT

NW 33RD ST

SW 2ND AVE

NW 15TH ST

SE 15TH AVE

NW 6TH AVE

SW 24TH AVE

NW 27TH TER

NE 8TH ST

NW 7TH ST

SW 31ST ST

SW 25TH TER

NW 20TH ST

SW 22ND AVE

SW 15TH TER

I 595 RAMP

SW FLAGLER AVE

SW 6TH ST

SW 30TH TER

NW 7TH AVE

NE 7TH AVE

SE 14TH ST

SW 26TH ST

NW 30TH ST

NE 29TH ST

NW 5TH CT

SW 12TH CT

NE 1ST ST

SW 19TH AVE

NW 8TH PL

NE 16TH AVE

NE 30TH ST

NW 34TH WAY

NW 35TH TER

N

S

R

7

SR 84

IN

T

E

R

S

TAT

E

9

5

S

SR

7

N

W

31S

T

AV

E

N

A

N

D

R

E

W

S

AV

E

P

O

W

E

R

L

NI E

R

D

N

O

C

EA

N

D

R

N

F

E

D

E

RA

L

H

WY

NW 19 ST

INTERSTATE 595

SE 17 ST

NW 62ND ST

W MCNAB RD

NE 26 ST

N

D

XI EI H

WY

W SUNRISE BLVD

NE 13 ST

W BROWARD BLVD

S

W

4

T

H

AV

E

W PROSPECT RD

NE 62ND ST

W COMMERCIAL BLVD

N

E 15

T

H

AV

E

RIVERLAND DR

FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE

NE 45TH ST

N

W

7

T

H

AV

E

E MCNAB RD

ELLER DR

S

D

XI EI H

WY

SE

19TH ST

W MCNAB RD

N

S

R

7

0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

A

TLA

N

TIC

O

CEA

N

OFFICIAL CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE ZONING MAP

AS ADOPTED JUNE 17, 1997 AND AS AMENDED

AS OF OCTOBER 18, 2011

RollinM\C:\Arcmap Projects\ftl_zones.mxd

μ

Map Legend

** Please see accompanying table for key

to zoning designations as shown on map.

Applicable regulations for zoning designations

shown are located in the city's Unified Land

Development Regulations (ULDR).

* Broward County zoning designations are

in effect in annexed areas until such time

city zoning designations are applied.

Corporate Limits

Zones**

Zoning Designations

Pending