canyons within the assessment area. Although continuation of current livestock grazing levels,

patchily distributed (Outcomes 3 and 4), these Reserves would not be located in pronghorn

populations were connected by movement of range. Alternatives 3, 4, and 6 would promote

sheep across open habitats between canyons. active restoration of rangelands by prescribing

Currently, encroachment of juniper and increased higher levels of burning to reduce sagebrush and

densities of sagebrush have reduced the amount of juniper densities and to promote increased forb

open areas, restricted sheep movement, and growth. This would improve the quality and disreduced the amount of habitat within canyons, tribution of pronghorn habitat to near historic

thereby, resulting in isolated and smaller popula- levels. Cumulative effects of highways, railroads,

tions. Many of the existing populations have been agricultural lands, and fences on non-Federal

reintroduced. Diseases transmitted by domestic lands will continue to fragment landscapes and

livestock, primarily sheep, contribute to cumula- restrict movements of pronghorn.

tive effects to California bighorn sheep that

reduce population size and distribution. SlIITIIliary Ef fGCtS by

Reintroductions and augmentation would-be AllOi 11811VO

required to maintain populations under all alternatives. Restoration of native ranges using prescribed Species Outcomes

burning would improve habitat conditions by

reducing the amount of juniper and the density of Weighted mean outcomes for all plant and vertesagebrush, but the difference between alternatives

 bratf sPecies assessed m thls stud

y

 a'e

 ^played

is slight. It is also estimated that the spread of

 b? alternative and planning area in figure 4.42.

exotic vegetation would continue in all alterna-

 These

 summarized results are a reflection of the

tives, but at a slower rate in Alternatives 4 and 6. Patter,

n of

 outcomes seen within most of the indiBecause of disease problems associated with

 vidual sPecies

 grouP

s reP0

«

ed above' Habitat for

domestic livestock, especially domestic sheep,

 nearlX dl

 fPecles TM*

 morc

 ^vorable under rnscumulative effects on California bighorn sheep

 torlc

 conditions than currently. Further declines

populations will remain high under all alternatives.

 m habltat

 are projected under Alternatives 1 and

5, but overall mean outcomes would change little

Pronghorn. Pronghorn populations in the assess- from current projections under the other alternament area have declined from historic levels dur- tives. Alternatives 4 and 6 appear to be most

ing early human settlement. Construction of favorable in overall mean outcome, but distincfences (impassable by pronghorn), roads, rail- tions among Alternatives 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7 are difroads, and the conversion of native ranges to agri- ficult to detect in the overall means shown here,

cultural crops have created barriers to pronghorn

movement between ranges and have resulted in Differences among the alternatives are more obvirestricted use of available habitats. However, con-

 ous m «gure 4.43, which displays the number of

ditions were improved beginning in the 1950s

 sPecief $** fel1 mto each

 outcome class by time

when fences were modified on Federal lands to Perlod (historic, current, and future under each of

promote movement of pronghorn. Encroachment

 the sev

r

en

 alternatives) and by planning area. One

of woody vegetation, increases in the density of

 view of

 ^hese

r

 differences would be to look at

sagebrush and associated decline in native herba-

 sPecie;>that fal1 mto

 Outcomes 1, 2, and 3 as conceous vegetation, and increases in livestock graz-

 trast<jd to those

 **

 fal1 mto

 Outcomes 4 and 5.

ing have contributed to declines in habitat on

 The brcak between

 Outcomes 3 and 4 is imporFederal lands

 tant as

 Outcome 4 indicates conditions under

which populations are largely isolated. On that

Alternatives 1, 2, 5, and 7 would result in contin- basis, Alternative 1 is projected to clearly support

ued decline in pronghorn habitat as a result of the fewest species at the level of Outcomes 1, 2,

Terrestrial 683
and 3, and Alternatives 4, 6, and 7 is projected to Distinctions between the alternatives are further

support the most species. Alternatives 2, 3, and 5 clarified in figure 4.44 which shows the number

are intermediate. A comparison of the alternatives of species under each alternative and planning

to current conditions reflects a conservative view area that were projected to change > 0.5 in

of our ability to restore ecosystems that have been weighted mean outcome. There are few species for

heavily modified from historic conditions. Even which habitat is projected to improve under

Alternatives 4, 6, and 7 which would have the Alternatives 1 and 2. A large number of species

most positive results, are projected to result in are projected to experience habitat decreases under

only moderate improvements over current condi- Alternative 1. Under Alternative 5, habitat

tions, especially in the UCRB planning area. decreases are projected for more species than are

Alternatives 1 and 5 are projected to result in habitat increases. Alternatives 3 and 7 display

declines from current. Compared on the basis of approximately equal numbers of increases and

number of species that fall in Outcomes 1 and 2, decreases, while only Alternatives 4 and 6 clearly

none of the alternatives would allow habitat and show more species for which habitat is expected to

populations to return to historic conditions. increase than species for which decreases are

expected.

Figure 4.42 Plants and Vertebrates

EEIS UCRB

1 i | =; i 1 i . :

Federal Cumulative Federal Cumulative

• a- * •&

2 - 2 -

 :

 ~—

o

j ' . Vg^S^^S * \g£££%£%

4 4 -

f- I _ i _ L . I I |__ I L. 1 I C l_l I I I I I I I (_

H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

Alternative Alternative

Figure 4.42. Mean outcome scores averaged over 141 (EEIS) and 132 (UCRB) species of plants and vertebrates in the planning

areas for historic, current, and future scenarios under seven preliminary draft EIS alternatives. Solid lines indicate scores for habitat conditions on Federal lands only; dashed lines indicate projected populations from cumulative effects analysis. These lines are

for illustrative purposes only; they do not imply trends between alternatives.

684 Terrestrial
Figure 4.43 Plants and Vertebrates

EEIS UCRB

Figure 4.43. Frequency distribution of mean habitat outcome scores for 141 (EEIS) and 132 (UCRB) species of plants and vertebrates on Federal lands in the planning areas for historic, current, and future conditions under seven preliminary draft EIS alternatives. See "Methods for Assessing Species and Habitat Outcomes" for full definition of each outcome score and for ranges of

weighted mean outcome values used to define each outcome score.

Figure 4.44 Plants and Vertebrates

Change from Current to Future

EEIS UCRB

Figure 4.44. Departure of habitat outcomes on Federal lands from current conditions under each alternative for 141 (EEIS) and

132 (UCRB) species of plants and vertebrates on Federal lands in the planning areas. Departure is estimated as a change of

weighted mean outcome of 0.5 units or greater.

Terrestrial
One important distinction among the alternatives effects of Alternative 7 are closer to those of

is the number of species for which some likeli- Alternatives 4 and 6 than are those of Alternatives

hood of extirpation (Outcome 5) is projected. 2 and 3. None of the alternatives is projected to

Figure 4.45 shows the number of species, by alter- result in a return to the relatively low likelihoods

native and planning area, for which there were of extirpation that were predicted for historic

mean likelihoods of 10 points, 20 points, and 50 conditions.

points attributed to Outcome 5 in the Federal

habitat analysis. Three different levels of likeli- Similarity of Alternatives

hood were used for this analysis because there is

no single, critical threshold of concern, particular- We used the weighted mean habitat outcomes for

ly when all taxa are combined in a single analysis. all Plant and vertebrate species that were assessed

At all three levels of likelihood a similar pattern

 to

 calculate average similarity among the time

among alternatives emerges. The overall likelihood Penods and alternatives (current conditions, hisof extirpations has increased from historic to cur-

 toric

 conditions, projected future conditions

rent conditions and is projected to continue "nder each of the seven alternatives). For this

increasing under Alternatives 1 and 5. Alternatives analysis, we computed matrices of Pearson correla4 and 6 are projected to result in small decreases

 tion

 coefficients for habitat on Federal land on the

in the likelihood of extirpation. Alternatives 2, 3 ^0 planning areas (table 4.21) and then used

and 7 show intermediate results, although the these matrices to compute a hierarchical cluster

Figure 4.45 Outcome 5

EEIS UCRB

60 | 1 60 I 1

;' \

; \

50 / \ 50 ft

> / ?- V A A

I

40' /A X A 40

 /A--, A

r~ u v^yv

 3° • / / \ ,v.A , •

I 20-/ / M * V"* 20- /* V- •<• "'

 V*"

z /.'irX * /••' Jk * '*'••*

° H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 ° H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

Period / Alternative Period / Alternative

10 pts 20 pts 50 pts 10 pts 20 pts 50 pts

•*- -4- * *--*•-• -

Figure 4.45. Numbers of species with likelihoods of 10, 20, and 50 points in Outcome 5 (habitat scarce, patchy and isolated with

high risk of local population extirpation) under historic and current periods and under each preliminary draft EIS alternative in

the EEIS and UCRB planning areas.

68S Terrestrial
Table 4.21. Similarity matrix (Pearson correlation) based upon weighted mean outcomes for all species

(plants and vertebrates) in the EEIS and UCRB planning areas.

Alternative H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6

EEIS

C .7425

A1 .5867 .8515

A2 .6399 .8710 .9551

A3 .6523 .8518 .9514 .9775

A4 .6883 .8270 .9008 .9518 .9670

A5 .6138 .8286 .9670 .9476 .9737 .9485

A6 .7132 .8381 .8995 .9513 .9639 .9956 .9413

AT .6651 .8329 .9006 .9613 .9512 .9695 .9195 .9692

UCRB

C .6885

A1 .5292 .8392

A2 .5573 .8593 .9532

A3 .5664 .8343 .9517 .9711

A4 .6029 .8112 .9067 .9463 .9668

A5 .5390 .8098 .9636 .9440 .9753 .9579

A6 .6283 .8217 .9077 .9463 .9631 .9944 .9507

A7 .5758 .8122 .9082 .9560 .9490 .9678 .9327 .9674

analysis using unweighted pair-group agglomera- Figure 4.46 Dendrograms

tion. We then constructed dendrograms to display „„„„ ,

I - ,c / /S\ *'

 EEIS Plannln9 arel

relationships among the scenarios (he. 4.46).

r

 ° ° Reacaled Di»t»nce

This analysis shows similar clustering of alterna- o s 10 is 20 25

tives in both planning areas. Alternatives 4, 6, and * * * * * *

7 formed one cluster, indicating that species were TM j~i

judged to respond more similarly to these three *7 —*—.

alternatives than to other alternatives (fig. 4.46). AS —I i

Alternatives 2 and 3 were closely correlated and AS I

clustered together, and Alternatives 1 and 5 were „ ZHZ^

clustered. Further clustering of the alternative outcomes in the UCRB EIS first grouped Alternatives

 B

-

 aaiB

 pi«nmng «re*

1, 2, 3, and 5, then that cluster with Alternatives M

4, 6, and 7. Current and historic outcomes were " J | ^

then linked at successively lower similarity levels. TM —pi {

The pattern was slightly different in the EEIS area £ —[-"

where Alternatives 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7 clustered next, c 1

then that cluster was joined with the cluster of

Alternatives 1 and 5. The current and historic out- s«m»rio

comes were then linked to the combination of all Figure 4.46. Dendrograms of similarity among time periods

alternatives. It is further apparent from table 4.21 and alternatives, based upon mean outcomes for 141 (EEIS)

that historic outcomes are clearly dissimilar to cur-

 md 132

 (UCRB) species of vascular plants and vertebrates in

j r LI • the planning areas. Similarity was calculated from a matrix of

rent outcomes and from the alternatives. „

 v 6

, . „- - ' „ • , ,,

rearson correlation coefficients among all scenarios (see table

4.21). In these figures, vertical lines connect sets of more

closely similar scenarios.

Terrestrial 68?
The linkage of Alternatives 4, 6, and 7 in both classes for each species. This measure incorporates

planning areas reflects the patterns of species variation among individual panelists as well as the

response described in the results of this assess- spread of likelihood points among outcomes by

ment. In most cases, species had higher average each panelist. We calculated the standard deviaoutcome scores in these alternatives than in oth- tion for each species and scenario and then averers, reflecting likely improvement in distribution aged these values among species for each scenario,

and abundance of habitat that is projected to Uncertainty, assessed by this measure, ranged

occur under these alternatives. Similarly, the link- from about 0.48 outcome units in the historic

age of Alternatives 1 and 5 reflects correlated scenario in both planning areas to about 0.58 in

responses of species to reduced riparian buffer most alternatives in the UCRB EIS area (fig.

provisions of these alternatives and to effects of 4.47). Uncertainty was lowest in the historic and

increased commodity production on species' current scenarios in both areas. Uncertainty varied

habitat. among classes of organisms in our assessment and

was highest for amphibians, lowest for plants, and

Uncertainty intermediate for birds, mammals, and reptiles in

the two planning areas (figs. 4.48 and 4.49).

The measure of uncertainty used throughout this

report is the standard deviation of the frequency

distribution of likelihoods among the outcome

Figure 4.47 Plants and Vertebrates

EEIS UCRB

0.6 I 1 0.6 I 1

,

D

j^ ys^***:sSsy\£TX^

d* a/ **-&nr

/

..• • •.. • . JT M

•H' If

0.5 &

I

Federal Cumulative Federal Cumulative

• Q- • Q

04U 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 J 04L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1_

H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

Alternative Alternative

Figure 4.47. Mean indices of uncertainty associated with weighted mean outcomes for 141 (EEIS) and 132 (UCRB) species of

vascular plants and vertebrates in the planning areas for historic, current, and future conditions under each alternative. Solid lines

indicate scores for habitat conditions on Federal lands only; dashed lines indicate projected populations from cumulative effects

analysis. These lines are for illustrative purposes only; they do not imply trends between alternatives.

688 Terrestrial
Figure 4.48 EEIS Federal Lands

0.80 [-JI» 0.70 ^V y/^Xrf' \. /

o 0-60 - 3^ ..<& s. .•&:.'_'.".'."....*

3 n. s^~~~~»t^..*yfc" — — -~ii"**f*

M

~$fr*»m— ^—-+1-—^»**^'*

^ 0 50 ^''^*

§ .....<?> * <8> * ^ * * «>

2 0.40 ^>

rt Qrt _| | | | | | | | L_

H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

Amphibians Birds Mammals Plants Reptiles

(n = 6) (n = 82) (n = 20) (n = 22) (n = 11)

Figure 4.48. Variation in mean uncertainty in weighted mean outcomes for amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals, and vascular

plants in the EEIS planning area.

Figure 4.49 UCRB Federal Lands

0.90 i 1

>, 0.80 -*V _

3 0.70 X. /^^* \ / .a

| 0.60 /*^ff^^

| 0.50 jpzz^ ----^ ^ ^ ^ ^

5

 0.40 -/

r\ or» |_| | | | | | | | [_

H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

Amphibians Birds Mammals Plants Reptiles

(n = 6) (n = 82) (n = 20) (n = 14) (n = 10)

Figure 4.49. Variation in mean uncertainty in weighted mean habitat outcome scores for amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals,

and vascular plants in the UCRB planning area.

Terrestrial 689
Acknowledgments

^^^^^^•^^•^^•MI^^HHM^^^HII^H^HHHi^HHIIMHMHii^^^BaHBHBnKfKW*1 : % . •

We want to acknowledge the participation of Lisa Croft in conducting the plant panel; the help of

Barbara Wales in maintaining our database and preparing materials for the panelists; David Cleaves for

assistance in development of the process used for this assessment; the work of Paul Brewster, Chris

Loggers, Katrina Martin, Cay Ogden, and Brad Thurber as panel scribes; and the efforts of Paul Brewster,

Michael Glos, Carole Jorgenson, Richard Nauman, Gail Rible, and Kreg Sloan who provided literature

reviews for species assessed in the panels; and the careful reviews provided by Scott Mills, Mike Wisdom,

and two anonymous reviewers. Elizabeth Galli-Noble assisted in editing, compiling and assembling the

final draft.

6QO Terrestrial
References

^^i^iH^^iH^^^HH^H^^^iHII^^HHHHHIIH^HIKi^HHHBBHHHH^HeiH!18e!ff:i7-»^^^- -.

Anthony, R.G.; Garrett, M.G.; Schuler, C.A. Black, H. 1974. A north temperate bat communi1993. Environmental contaminants in bald ty: structure and prey populations. Journal of

eagles in the Columbia River estuary. Journal Mammalogy. 55(1): 138-157.

of Wildlife Management b . 57: 10-19. . . \- r^r^ ,-VTT n is ,rvr,/

 Blaustem, A.R.; Hokit, D.G.; O Hara, R.K. 1994.

Anthony, R.G.; Issacs, F.B. 1989. Characteristics Pathogenic fungus contributes to amphibian

of bald eagle nest sites in Oregon. Journal of losses in the Pacific Northwest. Biological

Wildlife Management. 53: 148-159. Conservation. 67: 251-254.

Aubry, K.B.; Houston, D.B. 1992. Distribution Bock, C.E. 1970. The ecology and behavior of the

and status of the fisher in Washington. Lewis Woodpecker (Asyndesmus lewis). UniverNorthwestern Naturalist. 73: 69-70. sity of California Publications in Zoology. 92:

Axtell, R.W. 1972. Hybridization between western collared lizards with a proposed taxonomic Bellinger, E.K.; Gavin, T.A. 1992. Eastern

rearrangement. Copiea. 1972(4): 707-727. Bobolink populations: ecology and conserva-

. T T i • i -i • tlon in an agricultural landscape. In: Hagan,

Baker, J.M 1992. Habitat use and spatial orgam- ]M^ ffl. Johnston) D.W., eds Ecol and

zation of pine marten on southern Vancouver conservation of neotropical migrant landbirds.

Island British Columbia. Burnaby, BC: Simon Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution

Fraser University. 119 p. M.S. thesis. Press. 497.596

Ban

.

ci'V

- l?o4- 7°!Vf ^w^TT5' ^'E; », Bortolotti, G.R. 1984. Trap and poison mortality

Aubry K.B.; Buskirk, S.W. [and others], tech. of lden and bdd les Joumal of Wildlife

eds. 1 he scientific basis tor conserving rarest », _ , /Q in -fa i T-/O . . „. y , Management. 48: 1173-1179.

carnivores: American marten, hsher, lynx, and

wolverine in the Western United States. Gen. Boyce, M.S. 1992. Population viability analysis.

Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-254. Fort Collins, CO: Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 23:

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 481-506.

Rocky Mountain Forest an d Range Experiment . t n ~. , ^XT I n r 1 1 i

St • 99 127 Dramerd, K.; Z,ika, 1.; JNewnouse, B. [and others].

1995. Biogeography of the genus Carex in the

Bechard, M.J.; Schumtz, J.K. 1995. Ferruginous Columbia River Basin and neighboring lands.

Hawk (Buteo regalis). In: Poole, A.; Gill, F., eds. Contract Report 43-OEOO-5-5042. On file

The birds of North America 171. Philadelphia, with: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest

PA, and Washington, DC: The Academy of Service, U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of

Natural Sciences and the American Land Management, Interior Columbia Basin

Ornithologists' Union. 32 p. Ecosystem Management Project, 112 E. Poplar,

DT r. ._ . ,, . , ., Walla Walla, WA 99362. 172 p.

Betts, B.J. [in pressj. Roosting behavior or silverhaired and big brown bats in northeast Brown, H.A. 1990. Morphological variation and

Oregon. In: Barclay, R.M.R.; Brigham, R.M., age-class determination in overwintering tadeds. Bats and Forests. Proceedings of the first poles of the tailed-frog Ascaphus truei. Journal

bats and forest symposium, Victoria, BC. of Zoology. 220(2): 171-184.

Victoria: BC Forestry.

Terrestrial 691
Buck, S.G.; Mullis, C.; Mossman, A.S. [and Buskirk, S.W.; Forrest, S.C.; Raphael, M.G.;

others]. 1994. Habitat use by fishers in adjoin- Harlow, H.J. 1989. Winter resting site ecology

ing heavily and lightly harvested forest. In: of marten in the central Rocky Mountains.

Buskirk, S.W.; Harestad, A.S.; Raphael, M.G.; Journal of Wildlife Management. 53: 191-196.

Powell, R.A., eds. Martens, sables, and fishers:

biology and conservation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Buskirk S.W.; Powell, R.A. 1994. Habitat eco ogy

University Press: 368-376. °f*?hTM TMd American martens In: Buskirk,

S.W; Harestad, A.S.; Raphael, M.G.; Powell,

Bull, E.L. 1980. Resource partitioning among R.A., eds. Martens, sables, and fishers: biology

woodpeckers in northeastern Oregon. Moscow, and conservation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell

ID: University of Idaho. 109 p. Ph.D. University Press: 283-297.

Butler, R.W. 1981. The historical and present disBull, E.L.; Collins, C.T. 1993. Vaux's Swift tribution of the Bushtit in British Columbia.

(Chaetura vauxi). In: Poole, A.; Gill, E, eds. Murrelet. 62: 87-90.

The birds of North America 77. Philadelphia, wrui-r u uPA, and Washington, DC: The Academy of

 Cdl' M'W'; Mase[> Cj 1985. Wddhfe habitats in

Natural Sciences and The American

 mana§ed

 ^gelands -the Great Basin of

Ornithologists' Union. 12 p. southeastern Oregon. Gen Teck Rep. PNW-

& F GTR-187. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of

Bull, E.L.; Henjum, M.G. 1990. Ecology of the Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest

great gray owl. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR- Research Station. 30 p.

265. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of . nT

Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Cannings, RJ. 1991. Status report on the GrassResearch Station. 39 p. hopper Sparrow Ammodrammus savannarum in

British Columbia. On file with: University of

Bull, E.L.; Hohmann, J.E. 1993. The association British Columbia, Vancouver, BC. [not paged],

between Vaux's Swifts and old growth forests _ _ T T . . .

in northeastern Oregon. Western Birds. 24: Carey C 1993. Hypothesis concerning the causes

TM /2

 or

 the disappearance or Boreal loads from the

mountains of Colorado. Conservation Biology.

Bull, E.L; Wright, A.L.; Henjum, M.G. 1989. 7(2): 355-362.

Nesting and diet of Long-eared Owls in A* A mo/ n c • /-. n

conifer-forests, Oregon. Condor. 91: 908-912. Castellano MA 1994. Report on Fung,. On file

with: U.S. Department or Agriculture, Forest

Bury, R.B.; Corn, P.S. 1988. Douglas-fir forests in Service, U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of

the Oregon and Washington Cascades: relation Land Management, Interior Columbia Basin

of the herpetofauna to stand age and moisture. Ecosystem Management Project, 112 E. Poplar,

In: Szaro, R.C.; Severson, K.E.; Patton, D.R., Walla Walla, WA 99362. 75 p.

tech. eds. Management of amphibians, reptiles,

and small mammals in North America.

 Ch"7> J-A

- H.arP

e

!' J'S-

 1995

U Bryophytes of the

Proceedings of the symposium. Gen. Tech. Columbia *"«

 Basm' JJ* f *f Caiudum

Rep. RMGTR-166. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. border Contract No. 43-04R3-4-0181. On file

Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, ^lth: Uf; PeP

artment

 of Agriculture Forest

Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment J6^"'

 DePart

T

ment

 °f Interior, Bureau of

c, ,; 11 oo Land Management, Interior Columbia Basin

Station: 11-22. »

bcosystem Management Project, 112 b. Poplar,

Walla Walla, WA 99362. 49 p.

©92 Terrestrial
Chung-MacCoubrey, A. [in press]. Species com- Dobkin, D.S. 1993. Neotropical migrant landposition and roost requirements of bats using birds in the northern Rockies and Great Plains:

water sources in pinyon-juniper woodlands of a handbook for conservation management,

the middle Rio Grande River basin. In: Barclay, Publication Rl-93-94. Missoula, MT: U.S.

R.M.R.; Brigham, R.M., eds. Bats and Forests. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,

Proceedings of the first bats and forest sympo- Region 1. [not paged].

sium, Victoria, BC. Victoria, BC: BC Forestry.

Dunn, J.P.; Hall, J.S. 1989. Status of caveCopeland, J.P.; Harris, C.E. 1994. Wolverine dwelling bats in Pennsylvania. Journal of the

ecology and habitat use in central Idaho. Pennsylvania Academy of Sciences. 63(3):

Progress Report. On file with: Idaho Depart- 166-172.

ment of Fish and Game, 600 S. Walnut, Boise, .

ID 83712 29 Ehrlich, P.A.; Dobkin, D.S.; Wheye, D. 1988.

The birders handbook: a field guide to the natCorn, P.S.; Fogleman, J.C. 1984. Extinction of ural history of North American birds. New

montane populations of the northern leopard York: Simon and Schuster. 785 p.

frog (Rana pipiens) in Colorado. Journal of

Herpetology. 18(2): 147-152.

 En8> R'L;

 Schladweder, P. 1972. Sage grouse winter movements and habitat use in central

Cousineau, M.; Rogers, K. 1991. Observations on Montana. Journal of Wildlife Management. 36:

sympatric Rana pipiens, R. bLtiri, and their 141-146.

hybrids in eastern Colorado. Journal of „ . . ...

Herpetoloev. 25(1): 114-116. Enckson, J.L.; West, S.D. [in press]. Managed

forests in the Pacific Northwest: the effects of

Craig, T.H.; Trost, C.H. 1979. The biology and serai stage on bat habitat use patterns. In:

nesting density of breeding American Kestrals Barclay, R.M.R.; Brigham, R.M., eds. Bats and

and Long-eared Owls on the Big Lost River, Forests. Proceedings of First Bats and Forest

southeastern Idaho. Wilson Bulletin. 91: Symposium, Victoria, BC. Victoria, BC: BC

50-61. Forestry.

Crawford, J.A.; Lutz, R.S. 1985. Sage grouse pop- Eversman, S. 1994. Lichens of the Yellowstone

ulation trends in Oregon 1941-1983. Murrelet. ecosystem. Contract No. 43-OEOO-4-9195. On

66: 69-74. file with: U.S. Department of Agriculture,

_, ..,«„ / T • T^I Forest Service, U.S. Department of Interior,

Cronquist, A 1994 Intermountam Flora: Bufeau rf Land M ment> Interior

Vascular Plants of the Intermountam West Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management

US A Volume Five: Asterales. New York: The Project> 1 u £ Po ^ Walu WaUa> m

New York Botanical Garden, [not paged]. 9930 94

Daugherty, C.H.; Sheldon, A.L. 1982 Age- f {> R 1994 F ; from ^ Columbia Basin

specific movement patterns of&ctegAscaphas deposited in the University of Michigan

truet. Herpetologica. 38(4): 468-474. Herbarium. On file with: U.S. Department of

Dixon, R.D. 1995. Ecology of White-Headed Agriculture, Forest Service, U.S. Department of

Woodpeckers in the central Oregon Cascades. Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Interior

Moscow, ID: University of Idaho. 148 p. M.S. Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management

thesis Project, 112 E. Poplar, Walla Walla, WA

99362. 85 p.

Terrestrial 693
Foreman, E.D.; Bryan, T. 1987. Distribution, Green, G.S.; Anthony, R.G. 1989. Nesting sucabundance, and habitat of great gray owls in cess and habitat relationships of burrowing

south central Oregon. Murrelet. 68: 45-49. owls in the Columbia Basin, Oregon. Condor.

Fritts, S.H. 1992. Gray wolf recovery in the

northwestern United States. On file with: Gunson, J.R. 1991. Management plan for wolves

Okanogan National Forest, 1240 S. Second in Alberta. Wildlife Management Planning

Ave., Okanogan, WA 98840. 6 p. Series. Number 4. Edmonton: Alberta Forestry

c • CUD c c ,- T c inn/ TU Lands and Wildlife. 89 p.

Fntts, S.H.; Bangs, E.E.; Gore, J.F. 1994. The

relationship of wolf recovery to habitat conser- Hammer, S. 1995. The biogeography and ecology

vation and biodiversity in the northwestern of species in the lichen genus Cladonia in the

United States. Landscape and Urban Planning. Columbia River Basin. Contract No. 43-OEOO28: 23-32. 5-5100. On file with: U.S. Department of

i f-^ , «or, A i- • r i Agriculture, Forest Service, U.S. Department of

Galen, C . 19o9. A preliminary assessment o r th e T- D rrjx/ r T

r i T • . TMr 11 • TOT Interior, Bureau or Land Management, Interior

status or the Lewis Woodpecker in wasco ^ i u- n • c \i

^ _ _. XT n«-, «i Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management

County, Oregon. Report No. 88-3-01. p . H2 £ p , Walla Walla WA n 1 J /~\r» y"\ r*\ rivr-l 11-r 1 lUICCL, 11^. !_.. 1 UUld.1, W«lll<i Wdlld, W.TV

Portland, OR: Oregon Department or wildlife 0020 vn

XT n • --»0 JJj\)£. /U p.

Nongame Project. 23 p.

^ T^ T r^- T* ,-x T, i i ,, ^ r- Hammerson, G.A. 1982. Bullfrog eliminating

Garrett, K.L.; Dixon, R.D.; Raphael, M.G. lin T , c • /- i j u i • i i wn.- u j JW7 j i /n- -j Leopard Frogs in Colorado. Herpetological

press]. White-Headed Woodpecker (Ptcoides Review Hf4V 115 116

albolarvatus). In: Poole, A.; Gill, E, eds. The

 Ke CW>

 ^W'

 ll*~ll

Birds of North America [not numbered]. Haug, E.A.; Milsap, B.A.; Martell, M.S. 1993.

Philadelphia, PA, and Washington, DC: The Burrowing owl (Speotyto cunicularia). In: Poole,

Academy of Natural Sciences and The A.; Gill, E, eds. The Birds of North America

American Ornithologists' Union. 61. Philadelphia, PA, and Washington, DC:

/- TT7CU L /-A/--O-LT A The Academy of Natural Sciences and The

Gates, J.E.; Feldhamer G.A.; Griffith, LA.; American Ornithologists' Union. 20 p.

Raesly, R.L. 1984. Status of cave-dwelling bats ° r

in Maryland: importance of marginal habitats. Hayward, G.D.; Hayward, PH.; Garton, E.O.

Wildlife Society Bulletin. 12: 162-169. 1987. Revised distribution of the boreal owl in

„., _. c c „ „ irioo „ . the northern Rocky Mountains. Condor. 89:

Gilmer, D.S.; Stewart, R.E. 1983. Ferruginous /-,, ,-.^

hawk populations and habitat use in North

Dakota. Journal of Wildlife Management. 47: Hayward, G.D.; Hayward, PH.; Garton, E.O.

146-157. 1993. Ecology of boreal owls in the northern

_ . r, ,r.n,- TT i • in i i Rocky Mountains, USA. Wildlife Monographs.

Goggins, R. 1985. Habitat use by rlammulated 124-1 59

owls in northeastern Oregon. Corvallis:

Oregon State University. 54 p. M.S. Thesis. Hayward, G.D.; Verner, J. 1994. Flammulated,

r- r->\/i cuuiT-c f i iv- u boreal, and great gray owls in the United

Green, D.M.; Sharbel, T.E; Kearsley, J.; Kaiser, H. c u • i

, _._, „ 1-1 n • • States: a technical conservation assessment.

1996. Post glacial range fluctuation genetic Gen Tech R RM.GTR-253. Fort Collins,

subdivision and speciation in the Western CO; ^ Department of Agriculture, Forest

North American Spotted Frog complex, Rana c • D i x * • c jn

i- i • ^«-.-,/-,S/ service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range

rpretwsa. Evolution. 50:374-394. c • c • ->i a

 Experiment Station. 213 p.

©94 Terrestrial
Hornocker, M.G.; Hash, H.S. 1981. Ecology of Kaltenecker, J.; Wicklow-Howard, M.C. 1994.

the wolverine in northwestern Montana. Microbiotic soil crusts in sagebrush habitats of

Canadian Journal of Zoology. 59: 1286-1301. southern Idaho. Contract No. 43-OEOO-4-

TJ cr—inon n T r> j XT • i 9220. On file with: U.S. Department of Hunt, E.G. 1980. Report on Lava Beds National A • i c c • TT c r» r ' ...

 r

 . ,. ^ _, ..r . Agriculture, rorest Service, U.S. Department or

Monument bighorn sheep dieoff California ^^ Bufeau of Land Man nt> Interior

Department of Fish and Game Memorandum. Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management

Sacramento. 6 p. project> U2E p^ wdk WaUa> m

Janes, S.W. 1983. Status, distribution, and habitat 99362. 61 p.

selection of the grasshopper sparrow in Morrow ^^ Q p. ^ R G 1983 charactcristics

County, Oregon. Murrelet. 64: 51-54. of bald ^ communal roosts in the ^^^

Jennings, M.R.; Hayes, M.P. 1994. Amphibian Basin, Oregon and California. Journal of

and reptile species of special concern in Cali- Wildlife Management. 47: 1072-1079.

fornia. Final report submitted to the California Koehler( G M m? Jhe eco, of ^ j

Department of Fish and Game. Sacramento: (L canademis) in north-central Washington.

Inland Fisheries Division, [not paged]. p^,,,. Report Qn ffle ^. okanogan

Jessup, D.A. 1980. Pneumonia, bighorn, and National Forest, 1240 S. Walnut, Okanogan,

domestic sheep. American Association of WA 98840. 25 p.

Wildlife Veterinarians Newsletter. 4: 6. j^^ Q M mQ populadon and habkat char.

Jessup, D.A. 1982. Bighorn sheep and domestic acteristics of lynx and snowshoe hares in north

sheep: conflict in Nevada's Granite Mountains. central Washington. Canadian Journal of

American Association of Wildlife Veterinarians Zoology. 68: 845-851.

Newsletter. 14: 4-5. Koehler, G.M. 1991. Snowshoe hare, Lefus ameriJohnsgard, P.A. 1983. The Grouse of the World. canus, use of forest successional stages and popLincoln: University of Nebraska Press, [not ulation changes during 1985-1989 in northpaged] central Washington. Canadian Field-Naturalist.

105: 291-293.

Johnsgard, P.A. 1986. Birds of the Rocky Mountains with particular reference to national parks Koehler, G.M.; Aubry, K.B. 1994. Lynx. In:

in the northern Rocky Mountain region. Ruggiero, L.F.; Aubry, K.B.; Buskirk, S.W. [and

Boulder: Colorado Associated University Press. others], tech. eds. The scientific basis for con-

[not paged]. serving forest carnivores: American marten,

fisher, lynx, and wolverine in the Western

Johnsgard, P.A. 1990. Hawks, eagles, and falcons United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-254.

of North America. Washington, DC: Smith- Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of

sonian Institute, [not paged]. Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain

Jones, JJ. 1991. Habitat use of fisher in northcen-

 Forcst and

 ^"g6 Experiment Station: 74-98.

tral Idaho. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho. Koehler, G.M.; Brittell, J.D. 1990. Managing

147 p. M.S. thesis. spruce-fir habitat for lynx and snowshoe hares.

Jones, J.J.; Carton, E.G. 1994. Selection of sue- Journal of Forestrv-

 88: 1(M4

-

cessional stages by fishers in northcentral Laymon, S.A. 1987. Can the western subspecies

Idaho. In: Buskirk, S.W; Harestad, A.S.; of tne Yellow-billed Cuckoo be saved from

Raphael, M.G.; Powell, R.A., eds. Martens, extinction? Western Birds. 18: 19-25.

sables, and fishers: biology and conservation.

Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press: 283-297.

Terrestrial 695
Licht, L.E. 1986. Food and feeding behavior of Martin, S.K.; Witmer, G.; Sayler, R.D. 1995.

sympatric red-legged frogs, Rana aurora, and Carnivore conservation in the Columbia River

spotted frogs, Rana pretiosa, in southwestern Basin. On file with: U.S. Department of

British Columbia. Canadian Field-Naturalist. Agriculture, Forest Service, U.S. Department of

100(1): 22-31. Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Interior

,, _„ ,__ , ,vr c „ , Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Marcot, B.C. 1984. Winter use of some North- Project> j n £ p ^ wdk ^^ m

western California caves by western big-eared 99362 55 D

bats and long-eared myotis. Murrelet. 65: 46.

_ _ _ _. . McCune, B. 1994. Lichen species groups in the

Marcot, Bruce G ; Castellano, Mike; Christy, Columbia Basin: Ecosystem functions and

John; [and others], (in press). Chapter 5: indicator values. Contract No. 43-OEOO-4-

Terrestrial ecology of the Basin. In: Quigley, 925g Qn ffle with. ^ s Department Of

T.M.; Arbelbide, S.J., tech. eds. An assessment Agriculture, Forest Service, U.S. Department of

of ecosystem components in the interior Interior> Bufeau of Land Man ent> Interior

Columbia basin and portions of the Wamath Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management

and Great basins Gen Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR- Project) j 12 £ Po j Wjdk Wal]a> WA

XXX. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of 99362 262 D

Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest

Research Station. (Quigley, Thomas M., tech. McNeal, D.W. 1995. Report on the genus Allium

ed. The Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem in the Columbia River Basin. Contract No. 43-

Management Project: Scientific Assessment). OEOO-5-5062. On file with: U.S. Department

. , , -„ ,XT ., .. , of Agriculture, Forest Service, U.S. Department

Marks, J S. 1986. Nest-site characteristics and of ^^^ Bureau of Land Man ntj

reproductive success of Long-eared Owls in Interior Columbia Basin Ecos^stem Manage.

southwestern Idaho. Wilson Bulletin. 98: mem project) j ^ £ Poplar> WaUa ^^ m

547

-

560' 99362. 26 p.

Marks, J.S.; Marks, VS. 1987. Habitat selection Mech> L D 1993 TJ dati our thinki on the

by Columbian sharp-tailed grouse m western rok of human acdvi in wolf recovery.

S^46

 C nagement' 5 : Research Information Bulletin. U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.

Marks, J.S.; Yensen, E. 1980. Nest sites and food No.57.

habits of Long-eared Owls in southwestern Meinke> R; 1995a Assessmmt of the nus

Idaho. Murrelet. 61: 86-91. Mimuhu in the Columbia River Basin, for the

Marshall, D.C. 1992. Threatened and sensitive Eastside Ecosystem Management Project

vertebrates of Oregon's forests and woodlands. (EEMP). Contract No. 43-OEOO-5-5072. On

Portland, OR: Audubon Society of Portland. file with: U.S. Department of Agriculture,

66 p Forest Service, U.S. Department of Interior,

Bureau of Land Management, Interior ColumMartin, S.G.; Gavin, T.A. 1995. Bobolink bia Basin Ecosystem Management Project, 112

(Dolichonyx oryzivorous). In: Poole, A.; Gill, E, E Popiar) Wana w/idi^ WA 99362. 83 p.

eds. The Birds of North America 176.

Philadelphia, PA, and Washington, DC: The

Academy of Natural Sciences and The

American Ornithologists' Union. 24 p.

69S Terrestrial
Meinke, R.J. 1995b. Assessment of the genus Ormiston, J.H. 1966. The food habits, habitat,

Penstemon in the Columbia River Basin, for the and movements of mountain quail in Idaho.

Eastside Ecosystem Management Project Moscow, ID: University of Idaho. 39 p. M.S.

(EEMP). Contract No. 43-OEOO-5-5073. On thesis,

file with: U.S. Department of Agriculture, ^^ .

Forest Service, U.S. Department of Interior, Ormsbee, P.C. [in press]. Spatial distribution of

Bureau of Land Management, Interior Colum- ^ ro°J

st

l

s

 "sed bv,

 f

^

male My°"s volan' m

bia Basin Ecosystem Management Project, 112 ^16?

 h^tzt of the central Oregon CasE. Poplar, Walla Walla, WA 99362. 84 p. ^des

0

 In: E^' ^.R.; Brigham R.M.,

eds. Bats and rorests. Proceedings or the first

Miller, O.K.; Miller, H.H. 1994. Checklist of Bats and Forests Conference, Victoria, BC.

Columbia Basin fungi. Contract No. 43-OEOO- Victoria: BC Forests.

4-9246. On file with: U.S. Department of

Agriculture, Forest Service, U.S. Department of

 Per^ns' J"M

'

;

 Barrs, J M.; Peterson, J. 1990.

Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Interior Winter records of bats in Oregon and WashColumbia Basin Ecosystem Management

 in&on

- Northwestern Naturalist. 71: 59-62.

Project, 112 E. Poplar, Walla Walla, WA Perkins, J.M.; Cross, S.P. 1988. Differential use of

99362. 87 p. some coniferous forest habitat by hoary and silMiller, S.L. 1994. Macrofungi of the Columbia ver-haired bats in Oregon. Murrelet. 69: 21-24.

River Basin. Contract No. 43-OEOO-4-9252. Perimeter, S.I. [in press]. Bats and bridges: patOn file with: U.S. Department of Agriculture, terns Of night roost use by bats in the

Forest Service, U.S. Department of Interior, Willamette National Forest. In: Barclay,

Bureau of Land Management, Interior R.M.R.; Brigham, R.M., eds. Bats and Forests.

Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Proceedings of the first Bats and Forests

Project, 112 E. Poplar, Walla Walla, WA Conference, Victoria, BC. Victoria, BC: BC

99362. 151 p. Forests.

Milne, K.A.; Hejl, S.J. 1989. Nest-site characteris- powell, R.A.; Zielinski, WJ. 1994. Fisher. In:

tics of White-Headed Woodpeckers. Journal of Ruggiero, L.F.; Aubry, K.B.; Buskirk, S.W. [and

Wildlife Management. 53: 50-54. others], tech. eds. The scientific basis for conMunger, J.C.; Gerber, M.; Carroll, M. [and TMS

 forest

 «TMTM>«? American marten,

others]. 1995. Status and habitat associations ***\TM' and wolverine m the Western

of the Spotted Frog, Rana pretiosa, in United States. Gen Teck Rep. RM-GTR-254.

Southwestern Idaho. Final Report. On file *>rt Collms CO: U.S. Department of

with: Bureau of Land Management, Boise Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain

District, 3948 Development Ave., Boise, ID

 Forest and

 ^"g6 Experiment Station: 38-73.

83705-5389. [not paged]. Raphael, M.G.; White, M. 1984. Use of snags by

Navo, K.W.; Gore, J.A.; Skiba, G.T. 1992. w^r^ng ^^ ^ ^ ^TM^

Observations of the spotted bat, Euderma mac-

 Wlldllfe

 Monographs. 86: 1-66.

ulatum, in Northwestern Colorado. Journal of Reynolds, R.T.; Meslow, E.G.; Wight, H.W.

Mammalogy. 73(3): 547-551. 1978. Accipiter nesting habitats, Oregon.

Nussbaum, R.A.; Brodie, E.D., Jr.; Storm, R.M. Journal ^ Wildlife Management. 46: 124-138.

1983. Amphibians and reptiles of the Pacific Reynolds, R.T.; Wight, H.W. 1978. Distribution,

Northwest. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho density and productivity of accipiter hawks

Press. 332 p. breeding in Oregon. Wilson Bulletin. 90:

182-196.

Terrestrial 69?
Risser, P.G. 1981. The true prairie ecosystem. Sedgwick, J.A. 1994. Hammond's Flycatcher

Stroudsberg, PA: Hutchinson Ross Publishers. (Empidonax hammondi). In: Poole, A.; Gill, E,

[not paged]. eds. The Birds of North America 109.

n r. mnc T • L c L /- i u- Philadelphia, PA, and Washington, DC: The

Rosentreter, R. 1995. Lichens or the Columbia . , ' rxy » , i c,.:,,., „A TU

n- n • r\ ct • u u u c ,-vrr r Academy or Natural sciences and 1 he

River Basin. On hie with: Idaho State Orrice or .„ • /^ «:»u^i :„»,' TT«: „ i/'

, TT1 U 11 or, A • American (Jrmthologists Union, lop.

the Bureau or Land Management, 3380 Amencana Terrace, Boise, ID 83705-2500. 43 p. Spencer, W.D.; Barrett, R.H.; Zielinski, W.J.

_ _, /T-O-IT- I r> r 1983. Marten habitat preferences in the northRyan B. 1994. East Side Lichen Report for em Siefra Neva<k Jouma, of Wildlife

Washington and Oregon - Volumes 1-4. Management. 47: 1181-1186.

Contract No. 43-OEOO-4-9226. On file with:

 5

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Stewart, R.M. 1973. Breeding behavior and life

U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land history of the Wilson's Warbler. Wilson

Management, Interior Columbia Basin Bulletin. 85: 21-30.

Ecosystem Management Project, 112 E. Poplar, .

Walla Walla, WA 99362. 501 p.

 Thur°w>

 T.L.; White, CM. 1984. Nesting success

and prey selection or Long-eared Owls along a

Ryser, F.A. 1985. Birds of the Great Basin: a nat- juniper/sagebrush ecotone in south central

ural history. Reno: University of Nevada Press. Idaho. Murrelet. 65: 10-14.

Twining, H. 1940. Foraging behavior and survival

Saab, V.A.; Marks, J.S. 1992. Summer habitat use in the Sierra Nevada Rosy Finch. Condor. 42:

by Columbian sharp-tailed grouse in western 64-72.

Idaho. Great Basin Naturalist. 52: 166-173. TTn ^ r. . . „ „ . U.S. Department or Agriculture, rorest service;

Saab, V.A.; Rich, T.D. [in press]. Large-scale con- U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land

servation assessment for neotropical migratory Management. February 1996a. Interior

landbirds in the Interior Columbia River Basin. Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management

Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-xxx. Portland, Project; Eastside Preliminary Draft EnvironOR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest mental Impact Statement. On file with: U.S.

Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, U.S.

c i • TTC moo D j- u-i juu • Department of Interior, Bureau of Land

Sakai, H.F. 1988 Breeding biology and behavior Management, Interior Columbia Basin Ecoof Hamamonds and Western Flycatchers in m Man nt

 project; 112 E. p kr>

northwestern California. Western Birds. 19: WaUa Walla> m 99362 [irregular pagination].

"ty^OU.

c , c n T • nn -in-tn c • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service;

Sanborn, S.R.; Loomis, R B 1979 Systematics ^ D rtment Of interior, Bureau of Land

and behavior of collared lizards (Crotaphytus, Management. February 1996b. Interior

Iguamdae}I m southern California. Herpeto- Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management

logica. 35(2): 101 -106. pro.ect; Upper Columbia jy^ Basin prelimi.

Saunders, M.B.; Barclay, R.M.R. 1992. nary Draft Environmental Impact Statement.

Ecomorphology of insectivorous bats: a test of On file with: U.S. Department of Agriculture,

predictions using two morphologically similar Forest Service, U.S. Department of Interior,

species. Ecology. 73(4): 1335-1345. Bureau of Land Management, Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project, 112

E. Poplar, Walla Walla, WA 99362. [irregular

pagination].

^B Terrestrial
U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wild- Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife,

life Service. 1987. Northern Rocky Mountain 1993. Status of the Pygmy Rabbit BmchyUgus

wolf recovery plan. Denver, CO. 119 p. idahoensis in Washington. On file with:

,,„ „ r. , „. , i TMT.I i Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife,

U.S Department of the Interior, Fish and Wild- 6QO c ^ w North o, ia> WA 98501.

life Service. 1993. Grizzly bear recovery plan. j Q9 L ^ n

Denver, CO. 181 p.

TTC ^ - , T . „ , ,„., Weber, N.S. 1994. Pezizales of the Columbia

U.S Department of the Interior Fish and Wild- j^ Basin. imroduct and cautionary notes.

life Service. 1994 Recovery plan for woodland Contract No. 43-OEOO-4-9275. On file with:

canbou in the Selkirk Mountains. Portland, y s Departmem of Agriculture, Forest Service,

' P' U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land

U.S. Government. 1996. Rules and regulations. Management, Interior Columbia Basin

Federal Register. 61 (40): 7457 (Feb. 28, Ecosystem Management Project, 112 E. Poplar,

1996). 50 CFR 17, in part dealing with U.S. Walla Walla, WA 99362. 107 p.

Fish and Wildlife Service, endangered and Weckwerth, R.P.; Wright, P.L. 1968. Results of

threatened spec.es; notice classification of transplanting fishers in Montana. Journal of

96 candidate taxa. Washington, DC: U.S. Wildlife M ment. 32: 977.930.

Government Printing Orhce.

...„. _ ^ninncx , • •• Welsh, H.H. 1990. Relictual amphibians and old

Vogel, C.A.; Reese, K.P. 1995. Mountain quail sta- h forests Conservation Biology. 4(3):

tus report: a document preliminary to a habitat ? QQ -i i g

conservation assessment for mountain quail. On

file with: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Whitaker, J.O.; Maser, C. 1981. Food habits of

Forest Service, U.S. Department of Interior, seven species of lizards from Malheur County,

Bureau of Land Management, Interior Colum- southern Oregon. Northwest Science. 55(3):

bia Basin Ecosystem Management Project, 112 202-208.

E. Poplar, Walla Walla, WA 99362. 33 p. Wicklow.Howard, M.C. 1994. Vesicular-arbuscuVonhof, M.J. [in press]. Roosting ecology and lar mycorrhizae from sagebrush steppe habitat

roost-site preferences of reproductive female in western Idaho and parts of eastern and cenEptesicus juscus and Lasionyteris noctivagens in tral Oregon. Contract No. 43-OEOO-4-9220.

the Pend D'Oreille Valley in southern British On file with: U.S. Department of Agriculture,

Columbia. In: Barclay, R.M.R.; Brigham, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Interior,

R.M., eds. Bats and Forests. Proceedings of the Bureau of Land Management, Interior

first Bats and Forests Conference, Victoria, BC. Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management

Victoria, BC: BC Forests. Project, 112 E. Poplar, Walla Walla, WA

Wai-Ping, V; Fenton, M.B. 1989. Ecology of the "362"

 36 Pspotted bat (Euderma maculatum) roosting and Wicklow-Howard, M.C.; Kaltenecker, J. 1994.

foraging behavior. Journal of Mammalogy. Fungi from the Owyhee Region of southern

70(3): 617-622. Idaho and eastern Oregon. Contract No. 43-

W7ii JD^,C^I C j OEOO-4-9220. On file with: U.S. Department

Wallestad, R.O 1971. Summer movements and of Agriculture, Forest Service, U.S. Department

habitat use by sage grouse broods in central of Interior, Bureau of Land Management,

Montana. Journal of Wildlife Management. Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem

35: 129-136. Management Project, 112 E. Poplar, Walla

Walla, WA 99362. 76 p.

Terrestrial 699s
Wittenberger, J.F. 1978. The breeding biology of

an isolated Bobolink population in Oregon.

Condor. 80: 355-371.

Zeiner, D.C.; Laudenslayer, W.F.; Mayer, K.E.;

White, M., eds. 1990. California's wildlife. In:

Birds. Vol. 2. Sacramento: California Department of Fish and Game. 732 p.

Zika, P. 1995. Grapeferns and moonworts

(Botrychium, Ophioglossaceae) in the Columbia

Basin. Contract No. 43-OEOO-5-5051. On file

with: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest

Service, U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of

Land Management, Interior Columbia Basin

Ecosystem Management Project, 112 E. Poplar,

Walla Walla, WA 99362. 116 p.

700 Terrestrial
Appendix 4-A

mf^fHtf^ffHf^^f^fH^t^Hf^fi^ff^f^fi^^f^^ffffffH^K^Kimm^mKKf-m;:>^-m^ • • •..,..

List of panel participants

Vascular Plants Panel Passerines and Other Birds Panel

Lisa Croft, panel leader Martin Raphael, panel leader

Stephen Shelly, USDA Forest Service Katrina Martin, scribe, USDI Fish and

Wayne Owen, USDA Forest Service Wildlife Service

Victoria Saab, USDA Forest Service

Amphibians and Reptiles Panel Christine Paige, Missoula, Montana

Randy Hickenbottom, panel leader ^id D°

bkin' Hi.9h

 °ffTM*t

 Museum

 ., .

Cay Ogden, scribe, USDI Fish and Wildlife Service

 He

 f Ulmschneider, USDI Bureau of Land

Charlotte Corkran, Portland, Oregon _.

 Man|geme

 M0nA c * c •

Kenneth Kardong, Washington State University

 Diane Evans' USDA Forest Service

Charles Peterson, Idaho State University Bats and otner SmaM Mammals Panel

Waterbirds and Shorebirds Panel Randy Hickenbottom, panel leader

John Lehmkuhl, panel leader

 Brad Th"*?*> ^.rib?. t _. t ., . .fc

Cay Ogden, scribe, USDI Fish and Wildlife Service Jfmes J»"9".'

 Washington Statf VT8

?

1

*

Gar M y Ivey, USDI Fish and Wildlife Service Donna Howel^ U.S Department of the Army

isa

Grehin9tonDepartmentof

Fish and Game _. ffi^sffisss . , .. _. _ . . ' _ ..u.

John Ratti, University of Idaho

 Elizabeth Pierson' BerkeleV' California

Daniel Svingen, Nez Perce National Forest Carnivores and Ungulates Panel

Nils Warnock, University of Nevada, Reno

Robert Naney, panel leader

Raptors and Gamebirds Panel Cnris Loggers, scribe, USDA Forest Service

Richard Holthausen, panel leader

 Jo^ Cook: National C°uncil for Air and

Brad Thurber scribe Stream Improvement

Edward Garton, University of Idaho Thomas Hobbes Colorado Division of Wildlife

John Marzluff, Sustainable Ecosystems Institute £red Lmdsey Umversity <* Wyoming

Kerry Reese, University of Idaho Paul Pa^

et' Unive^ °f Alber a

 .

Richard Reynolds, USDA Forest Service

 Leonard

 R^ggiero, USDA Forest Service

John Squires, USDA Forest Service

Cavity Nesting Birds Panel

Martin Raphael, panel leader

Paul Brewster, scribe, USDA Forest Service

Evelyn Bull, USDA Forest Service

James Sedgwick, National Biological Survey

Rita Dixon, University of Idaho

David Marshall, Portland, Oregon

Terrestrial 701
Appendix 4-B

•••^^•IH^^^H^HHHHIIH^^HHHMHHBI^HBHHHHiHHIIIHBBHHHIHIBHH

Vascular plant species considered for evaluation of management alternatives in the Interior Columbia

River Basin assessment area.

Distribution & Scientific Name Evaluation'

Locally Endemic:

Abronia ammophila Fine

Agrostis rossiae Fine

Allium aaseae Fine

Allium dictuon Fine

Amsinckia carinata Fine

Arabis suffrutescens var. horizontalis Fine

Artemisia ludoviciana ssp. estesii Fine

Astragalus applegatei No

Astragalus atratus var. inseptus Fine

Astragalus collinus var. laurentii Fine

Astragalus columbianus Fine

Astragalus diaphanus var. diurnis Fine

Astragalus howellii Fine

Astragalus sinuatus Fine

Astragalus tyghensis Fine

Astragalus vexilliflexus var. nubilus Fine

Balsamorhiza rosea Fine

Botrychium pumicola Fine

Calochortus longebarbatus var. pec/w Yes

Calochortus macrocarpus var. maculosus Fine

Camissonla pygmaea Fine

Castilleja christii Fine

Castilleja cryptantha Fine

Castilleja pilosa var. steenensis Fine

Castilleja rubida Fine

Chrysothamnus parryi ssp. montanus Fine

Claytonia umbellata Fine

Cymopterus davisii Fine

Delphinium viridescens Fine

Draba trichocarpa Fine

Erigeron basalticus Fine

Erigeron lackschewitzii Fine

Eriogonum chrysops Fine

Eriogonum crosbyae Fine

Eriogonum meledonum Fine

Erythronium grandiflorum var. nudipetalum Fine

Hackelia venusta Fine

Haplopappus insecticruris Fine

/ves/a rhypara var. shellyi Fine

Lathyrus grimesii Fine

Leptodactylon glabrum Fine

Leptodactylon pungens ssp. hazeliae Fine

Lesquerella carinata var. languida Fine

Lesquerella humilis Fine

Lomatium erythrocarpum Fine

Lomatium greenmanii Fine

702 Terrestrial
Distribution & Scientific Name Evaluation'

Lomatium sp. nov. ("ochocoensis") Fine

Lomatium tuberosum Fine

Luina serpentina Fine

Lupinus cusickil Fine

Mimulus hymenophyllus Fine

Mimulus patulus Fine

Mirabilis macfarlanei Yes

Oenothera psammophila Fine

Oxytropis campestris var. wanapum Fine

Parnassia kotzebuei var. pumila Fine

Penstemon idahoensis Fine

Penstemon peckii Fine

Perideridia erythrorhiza Fine

Petrophytum cinerascens Fine

Phacelia lenta Fine

PWox idahonis Fine

Physaria didymocarpa var. /yrafa Fine

Primula alcalina Fine

Ranunculus reconditus Fine

Rubus bartonianus Fine

Rubus nigerrimus Fine

Saxifraga bryophora var. tobiasiae Fine

Senecio ertterae Fine

Sidalcea oregana var. ca/va Fine

Silene seelyi Fine

Sisyrinchium sarmentosum Fine

Stephanomeria malheurensls Yes

Tauschia hooveri Fine

Thelypodium howellii ssp. spectabilis Fine

Thelypodium repandum Fine

Tofieldia glutinosa ssp. absona Fine

Trifolium leibergii Fine

Trifolium thompsonii Yes

Regionally Endemic:

Arabis falcifructa Fine

4rab/s fecunda Fine

Artemisia campestris var. wormskioldii Fine

Aster jessicae No

^sfer moffis Fine

Astragalus anserinus Fine

Astragalus cusickli var. sterilis Fine

Astragalus diaphanus var. diaphanus Fine

Astragalus mulfordiae Yes

Astragalus oniciformis Yes

Astragalus paysonii Yes

Astragalus peckh Fine

Astragalus scaphoides Fine

Astragalus solitarius Yes

Astragalus tegetarioides Fine

Astragalus yoder-williamsii Yes

Calochortus longebarbatus var. longebarbatus Yes

Calochortus nitidus Yes

Terrestrial 703
Distribution & Scientific Name Evaluation1

Carex parryana ssp. idahoa Fine

Castilleja chlorotica Yes

Chaenactis cusickii Fine

Collomla mazama Yes

Cymopterus douglassii Fine

Descurainia torulosa Fine

Douglasia idahoensis Fine

Erigeron latus Fine

Erigeron salmonensis Fine

Eriogonum cusickii Fine

Eriogonum lewisii Fine

Eriogonum prociduum Fine

Grindelia howellii Yes

Hackelia cronquistii Yes

Haplopappus liatriformis Yes

Haplopappus radiatus Fine

Iliamna longisepala Fine

/ves/a rhypara var. rhypara Fine

Lepidium davisii Fine

Lepidium papilliferum Fine

Lesquerella carinata var. carinata No

Lesquerella paysonii Fine

Lesquerella pulchella No

Limnanthes floccosa var. bellingeriana Fine

Lomatium suksdorfii Yes

Lupinus biddlei No

Mentzelia mollis Fine

Mentzelia packardiae Fine

Mimulus clivicola Fine

Mimulus evanescens Fine

Mimulus jungermannioides Fine

Mimulus pygmaeus Yes

Mimulus washingtonensis Yes

Oryzopsis hendersonii Fine

Oryzopsis wallensis Fine

Oxytropis campestris var. columbiana Fine

Papaver pygmaeum Fine

Penstemon barrettiae Fine

Penstemon compactus Fine

Penstemon glaucinus Yes

Penstemon lemhiensis Yes

Physaria integritolia var. monticola Fine

Pleuropogon oregonus Fine

Polemonium pectinatum Yes

Potentilla cottamii Fine

S/'/ene spaldingii Yes

Thelypodium eucosmum Fine

Trifolium douglasii Fine

Trifblium owyheense Fine

704 Terrestrial
Distribution & Scientific Name Evaluation'

Scattered Distribution:

Antennaria arcuate Fine

Botrychium ascendens Yes

Botrychium crenulatum Yes

Botrychium paradoxum Yes

Botrychium pedunculosum Fine

Collomia renacta Fine

Cymopterus nivalis Fine

Cypripedium fasciculatum Yes

Howellia aquatilis Yes

Meconella oregana Fine

Oryzopsis contracta No

Phacelia inconspicua Fine

Phacelia minutissima Fine

Rorippa columbiae Fine

Disjunct Distribution:

Astragalus pulsiferae var. suksdorfii Fine

Musineon lineare Fine

Sullivantia hapemanii var. hapemanii Fine

Peripheral to Columbia Basin:

Care* lenticularis var. dolia Fine

'Evaluation: "Yes" - alternative outcomes evaluated; "Fine" - recommended for fine-scale analysis by Forests or BLM units; "No" - no panel Analysis done, and not recommended for fine-scale analysis.

Terrestrial 705
Appendix 4-C

Vertebrate species occurring in the Interior Columbia River Basin assessment area, with designation for

evaluation of management alternatives.

Common name Scientific name Evaluation1

Amphibians:

Cascade torrent salamander Rhyacotriton cascadae no

Cope's giant salamander Dicamptodon cope/ no

Idaho giant salamander Dicamptodon aterrimus Fine

Long-toed salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum no

Northwestern salamander Ambystoma gracile no

Tiger salamander Ambystoma tigrinum no

Coeur d'Alene salamander Plethodon idahoensis HER

Dunn's salamander Plethodon dunni no

Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii no

Larch mountain salamander Plethodon larselli Fine

Oregon slender salamander Batrachoseps wrighti no

Rough-skin newt Taricha granulosa no

Western toad Bufo boreas HER

Woodhouse's toad Bufo woodhousii HER

Pacific chorus frog Pseudacris regilla no

Western chorus frog Pseudacris triseriata no

Tailed frog Ascaphus true/ HER

Great basin spadefoot Spea intermontana no

Bullfrog Rana catesbeiana no

Cascades frog Rana cascadae no

Foothill yellow-legged frog Rana boylei no

Green frog Rana clamitans no

Northern leopard frog Rana pipiens HER

Red-legged frog Rana aurora no

Spotted frog species B Rana pretiosa sp. B HER

Spotted frog species A Rana pretiosa sp. A HER

Wood frog Rana sylvatica Fine

Birds:

Common loon Gavia immer WAT

Pacific loon Gavia pacifica no

Red-throated loon Gavia stellata no

Yellow-billed loon Gavia adamsii no

Clark's grebe Aechmophorus clarkii WAT

Eared grebe Podiceps nigricollis no

Horned grebe Podiceps auritus no

Pied-billed grebe Podilymbus podiceps no

Red-necked grebe Podiceps grisegena WAT

Western grebe Aechmophorus occidentalis WAT

American white pelican Pelecanus erythrorhynchos WAT

Double-crested cormorant Phalacrocorax auritus no

American bittern Botaurus lentiginosus WAT

Black-crowned night heron Nycticorax nycticorax WAT

Cattle egret Bubulcus ibis no

Great blue heron Ardea herodias WAT

Great egret Casmerodius albus WAT

7QB Terrestrial
Common name Scientific name Evaluation'

Green heron Butorides virescens no

Snowy egret Egretta thula WAT

Western least bittern Ixobrychus exills hesperis WAT

White-faced ibis Plegadis chihi WAT

American black duck Anas rubripes no

American wigeon Anas americana WAT

Barrow's goldeneye Bucephala Islandica WAT

Black scoter Melanitta nigra no

Blue-winged teal Anas discors WAT

Brant Branta bemicla no

Bufflehead Bucephala albeola WAT

Canada goose Branta canadensis no

Canvasback Aythya valisineria WAT

Cinnamon teal Anas cyanoptera WAT

Common goldeneye Bucephala clangula WAT

Common merganser Mergus merganser WAT

Eurasian wigeon Anas penelope no

Gadwall Anas strepera WAT

Greater scaup Aythya mania no

Greater white-fronted goose Anser albifrons no

Green-winged teal Anas crecca WAT

Harlequin duck Histrlonicus histrionicus WAT

Hooded merganser Lophodytes cucullatus WAT

Lesser scaup Aythya affinis WAT

Mallard Anas platyrhynchos WAT

Mute swan Cygnus olor no

Northern pintail Anas acute WAT

Northern shoveler Anas clypeata WAT

Oldsquaw Clangula hyemalis no

Red-breasted merganser Mergus serrator no

Redhead Aythya americana WAT

Ring-necked duck Aythya collaris WAT

Ross' goose Chen rossii no

Ruddy duck Oxyura jamaicensis WAT

Snow goose Chen caerulescens no

Surf scoter Melanitta perspicillata no

Trumpeter swan Cygnus buccinator WAT

Tundra swan Cygnus columbianus no

White-winged scoter Melanitta fusca no

Wood duck Aix sponsa WAT

Turkey vulture Cathartes aura no

Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus RGB

Black-shouldered kite Elanus caeruleus no

Cooper's hawk Accipiter cooper/7 RGB

Ferruginous hawk Buteo regalis RGB

Golden eagle Aquila chrysaetos no

Northern goshawk Accipiter gentilis RGB

Northern harrier Circus cyaneus no

Osprey Pandion hallaetus no

Red-shouldered hawk Buteo lineatus no

Red-tailed hawk Buteo jamaicensis no

Rough-legged hawk Buteo lagopus no

Sharp-shinned hawk Accipiter striatus no

Swainson's hawk Buteo swainsoni RGB

Terrestrial 70?
Common name Scientific name Evaluation1

American kestrel Falco span/eras no

Gyrfalcon Falco rusticolus no

Merlin Falco columbarius RGB

Peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus no

Prairie falcon Falco mexicanus no

Blue grouse Dendragapus obscurus RGB

California quail Callipepla californica no

Chukar Alectoris chukar no

Columbian sharp-tailed grouse Tympanuchus phasianellus columbianus RGB

Gambel's quail Callipepla gambelii no

Gray partridge Perdixperdix no

Mountain quail Oreortyx pictus RGB

Northern bobwhite Colinus virginianus no

Ring-necked pheasant Phasianus colchicus no

Ruffed grouse Bonasa umbellus no

Sage grouse Centrocercus urophasianus RGB

Scaled quail Callipepla squamata no

Spruce grouse Dendragapus canadensis no

White-tailed ptarmigan Lagopus leucurus no

Wild turkey Meleagris gallopavo no

American coot Fulica americana no

Sora Porzana Carolina WAT

Virginia rail Rallus limicola WAT

Yellow rail Coturnicops noveboracensis Fine

Greater sandhill crane Grus canadensis tabida WAT

Whooping crane Grus americana no

American golden-plover Pluvialis dominica no

Black-bellied plover Pluvialis squatarola WAT

Killdeer Charadrius vociferus no

Mountain plover Charadrius montanus no

Semipalmated plover Charadrius semipalmatus WAT

Western snowy plover Charadrius alexandrlnus nivosus WAT

American avocet Recurvirostra americana WAT

Black-necked stilt Himantopus mexicanus WAT

Baird's sandpiper Calidris bairdii WAT

Common snipe Gallinago gallinago WAT

Dunlin Calidris alpina WAT

Greater yellowlegs Tringa melanoleuca WAT

Hudsonian godwit Limosa haemastica no

Least sandpiper Calidris minutilla WAT

Lesser yellowlegs Tringa flavipes WAT

Long-billed curlew Numenius americanus WAT

Long-billed dowitcher Limnodromus scolopaceus WAT

Marbled godwit Limosa fedoa WAT

Pectoral sandpiper Calidris melanotos WAT

Red knot Calidris canutus no

Red phalarope Phalaropus fulicaria no

Red-necked phalarope Phalaropus lobatus WAT

Sanderling Calidris alba WAT

Semipalmated sandpiper Calidris pusilla WAT

Short-billed dowitcher Limnodromus griseus no

Solitary sandpiper Tringa solitaria no

Spotted sandpiper Actitis macularia WAT

Stilt sandpiper Calidris himantopus no

708 Terrestrial
Common name Scientific name Evaluation'

Upland sandpiper Bartramia longicauda WAT

Western sandpiper Calidris mauri WAT

Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus no

White-rumped sandpiper Calidris fuscicollis no

Willet Catoptrophorus semipalmatus WAT

Wilson's phalarope Phalaropus tricolor WAT

Black tern Chlidonias niger WAT

Bonaparte's gull Larus Philadelphia no

California gull Larus californlcus WAT

Caspian tern Sterna caspia Fine

Common tern Sterna hirundo no

Forster's tern Sterna forsteri WAT

Franklin's gull Larus pipixcan no

Glaucous gull Larus hyperboreus no

Glaucous-winged gull Larus glaucescens no

Herring gull Larus argentatus no

Long-tailed jaeger Stercorarius longicaudus no

Mew gull Larus canus no

Parasitic jeager Stercorarius parasiticus no

Ring-billed gull Larus delawarensis WAT

Sabine's gull Xema sabini no

Thayer's gull Larus thayeri no

Ancient murrelet Synthliboramphus antiquus no

Marbled murrelet Brachyramphus marmoratus no

Band-tailed pigeon Columba fasciata RGB

Mourning dove Zenaida macroura no

Rock dove Columba livia no

Black-billed cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus no

Yellow-billed cuckoo Coccyzus americanus PAS

Common barn owl Tyto alba no

Barred owl Strix varia RGB

Boreal owl Aegolius funereus RGB

Burrowing owl Athene cunicularia RGB

Flammulated owl Ofus flammeolus RGB

Great gray owl Strix nebulosa RGB

Great horned owl Bubo virginianus no

Long-eared owl Asio otus RGB

Northern hawk owl Surnia ulula no

Northern pygmy-owl Glaucidium gnoma RGB

Northern saw-whet owl Aegolius acadicus RGB

Northern spotted owl Strix occidentalis caurina RGB

Short-eared owl Asio flammeus no

Snowy owl Nyctea scandiaca no

Western screech owl Ofus kennicottii RGB

Common nighthawk Chordeiles minor PAS

Common poorwill Phalaenoptilus nuttallii no

Whip-poor-will Caprimulgus vociferus no

Black swift Cypseloides niger no

Vaux's swift Chaetura vauxi CAV

White-throated swift Aeronautes saxatalis no

Anna's hummingbird Calypte anna no

Black-chinned hummingbird Archilochus alexandri PAS

Broad-tailed hummingbird Selasphorus platycercus PAS

Calliope hummingbird Stellula calliope no

Terrestrial 70S
Common name Scientific name Evaluation1

Costa's hummingbird Calypte costae no

Rufous hummingbird Selasphorus rufus PAS

Belted kingfisher Ceryle alcyon no

Black-backed woodpecker Picoides arcticus CAV

Downy woodpecker Picoides pubescens CAV

Hairy woodpecker Picoides villosus CAV

Lewis' woodpecker Melanerpes lewis CAV

Northern flicker Colaptes auratus no

Pileated woodpecker Dryocopus pileatus CAV

Red-breasted sapsucker Sphyrapicus ruber Fine

Red-headed woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus no

Red-naped sapsucker Sphyrapicus nuchalis CAV

Three-toed woodpecker Picoides tridactylus CAV

White-headed woodpecker Picoides albolarvatus CAV

Williamson's sapsucker Sphyrapicus thyroideus CAV

Yellow-bellied sapsucker Sphyrapicus varius Fine

Acorn woodpecker Melanerpes formicivorus no

Alder flycatcher Empidonax alnorum no

Ash-throated flycatcher Myiarchus cinerascens PAS

Cordilleran flycatcher Empidonax occidental no

Dusky flycatcher Empidonax oberholseri no

Eastern kingbird Tyrannus tyrannus no

Gray flycatcher Empidonax wrightii no

Hammond's flycatcher Empidonax hammondii PAS

Least flycatcher Empidonax minimus Fine

Olive-sided flycatcher Contopus borealis PAS

Say's phoebe Sayomis saya no

Scissor-tailed flycatcher Tyrannus forficatus no

Western kingbird Tyrannus verticalis no

Western wood-pewee Contopus sordidulus no

Willow flycatcher Empidonax traillii PAS

Horned lark Eremophila alpestris PAS

Bank swallow Riparia riparia no

Barn swallow Hirundo rustica no

Cliff swallow Hirundo pyrrhonota no

Northern rough-winged swallow Stelgidopteryx serripennis no

Purple martin Progne subis no

Tree swallow Tachycineta bicolor no

Violet-green swallow Tachycineta thalassina no

American crow Corvus brachyrhynchos no

Black-billed magpie Pica pica no

Blue jay Cyanocitta cristata no

Clark's nutcracker Nucifraga columbiana no

Common raven Corvus corax no

Gray jay Perisoreus canadensis no

Pinyon jay Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus no

Scrub jay Aphelocoma coerulescens no

Steller"s jay Cyanocitta stelleri no

Black-capped chickadee Parus atricapillus no

Boreal chickadee Parus hudsonicus no

Chestnut-backed chickadee Parus rufescens CAV

Mountain chickadee Parus gambeli no

Plain titmouse Parus inomatus no

Bushtit Psaltriparus minimus PAS

718 Terrestrial
Common name Scientific name Evaluation1

Pygmy nuthatch Sitta pygmaea CAV

Red-breasted nuthatch Sitta canadensis no

White-breasted nuthatch Sitta carolinensis CAV

Brown creeper Certhia americana no

Bewick's wren Thryomanes bewickii no

Canyon wren Catherpes mexicanus no

House wren Troglodytes aedon no

Marsh wren Cistothorus palustris no

Rock wren Salpinctes obsoletus no

Winter wren Troglodytes troglodytes PAS

American dipper Cinclus mexicanus no

American robin Turdus migratorius no

Blue-gray gnatcatcher Polioptila caerulea no

Golden-crowned kinglet Regulus satrapa no

Hermit thrush Catharus guttatus no

Mountain bluebird Sialia currucoides no

Ruby-crowned kinglet Regulus calendula no

Swainson's thrush Catharus ustulatus no

Townsend's solitaire Myadestes townsendi no

Varied thrush Ixoreus naevius no

Veery Catharus fuscescens PAS

Western bluebird Sialia mexicana PAS

Wrentit Chamaea fasciata no

Brown thrasher Toxostoma rufum no

Gray catbird Dumetella carolinensis no

Northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos no

Sage thrasher Oreoscoptes montanus PAS

American pipit Anthus rubescens no

Sprague's pipit Anthus spragueii no

Bohemian waxwing Bombycilla garrulus no

Cedar waxwing Bombycilla cedrorum no

Phainopepla Phainopepla nitens no

Loggerhead shrike Lanius ludovicianus PAS

Northern shrike Lanius excubitor no

European starling Sturnus vulgaris no

Red-eyed vireo Vireo olivaceus PAS

Solitary vireo Vireo solitarius no

Warbling vireo Vireo gilvus no

American redstart Setophaga ruticilla no

American tree sparrow Spizella arborea no

Baird's sparrow Ammodramus bairdii no

Bay-breasted warbler Dendroica castanea no

Black-and-white warbler Mniotilta varia no

Black-headed grosbeak Pheucticus melanocephalus no

Black-throated blue warbler Dendroica caerulescens no

Black-throated gray warbler Dendroica nigrescens no

Black-throated sparrow Amphispiza bilineata Fine

Blackburnian warbler Dendroica fusca no

Blackpoll warbler Dendroica striata no

Blue grosbeak Guiraca caerulea no

Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus PAS

Brewer's blackbird Euphagus cyanocephalus PAS

Brewer's sparrow Spizella breweri PAS

Brown-headed cowbird Molothrus ater no

Terrestrial 711
Common name Scientific name Evaluation1

California towhee Pipilo crissalis no

Chestnut-collared longspur Calcarius ornatus no

Chestnut-sided warbler Dendroica pensylvanica no

Chipping sparrow Spizella passerina PAS

Clay-colored sparrow Spizella pallida Fine

Common grackle Quiscalus quiscula no

Common yellowthroat Geothlypis trichas no

Dark-eyed junco Junco hyemalis no

Dickcissel Spiza americana no

Fox sparrow Passerella iliaca no

Golden-crowned sparrow Zonotrichia atricapilla no

Grasshopper sparrow Ammodramus savannarum PAS

Great-tailed grackle Quiscalus mexicanus no

Green-tailed towhee Pipilo chlorurus PAS

Harris' sparrow Zonotrichia querula no

Hermit warbler Dendroica occidentalis Fine

House sparrow Passer domesticus no

Indigo bunting Passerina cyanea no

Lapland longspur Calcarius lapponicus no

Lark bunting Calamospiza melanocorys no

Lark sparrow Chondestes grammacus PAS

Lazuli bunting Passerina amoena PAS

Le conte's sparrow Ammodramus leconteii no

Lincoln's sparrow Melospiza lincolnii no

Macgillivray's warbler Oporornis tolmiei no

Magnolia warbler Dendroica magnolia no

Mccown's longspur Calcarius mccownii no

Nashville warbler Vermivora ruficapilla no

Northern oriole Icterus galbula no

Northern parula Parula americana no

Northern waterthrush Seiurus noveboracensis no

Orange-crowned warbler Vermivora celata no

Ovenbird Seiurus aurocapillus no

Painted redstart Myioborus pictus no

Palm warbler Dendroica palmarum no

Red-winged blackbird Agelaius phoeniceus PAS

Rose-breasted grosbeak Pheucticus ludovicianus no

Rufous-sided towhee Pipilo erythrophthalmus PAS

Rusty blackbird Euphagus carolinus no

Sage sparrow Amphispiza belli PAS

Scarlet tanager Piranga olivacea no

Scott's oriole Icterus parisorum no

Snow bunting Plectrophenax nivalis no

Song sparrow Melospiza melodia no

Summer tanager Piranga rubra no

Swamp sparrow Melospiza georgiana no

Tennessee warbler Vermivora peregrina no

Townsend's warbler Dendroica townsendi no

Tricolored blackbird Agelaius tricolor Fine

Vesper sparrow Pooecetes gramineus PAS

Virginia's warbler Vermivora virginiae no

Western meadowlark Sturnella neglecta PAS

Western tanager Piranga ludoviciana PAS

White-crowned sparrow Zonotrichia leucophrys no

712 Terrestrial
Common name Scientific name Evaluation'

White-throated sparrow Zonotrichia albicollis no

Wilson's warbler Wilsonia pusilla PAS

Yellow warbler Dendroica petechia PAS

Yellow-breasted chat Icteria wrens PAS

Yellow-headed blackbird Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus no

Yellow-rumped warbler Dendroica coronate no

American goldfinch Carduelis tristis no

Black rosy finch Leucosticte atrata PAS

Cassin's finch Carpodacus cassinii no

Common redpoll Carduelis flammea no

Evening grosbeak Coccothraustes vespertinus no

Gray-crowned rosy finch Leucosticte tephrocotis no

Hoary redpoll Carduelis hornemanni no

House finch Carpodacus mexicanus no

Lesser goldfinch Carduelis psaltria no

Pine grosbeak Pinicola enucleator no

Pine siskin Carduelis pinus no

Purple finch Carpodacus purpureus no

Red crossbill Loxia curvirostra no

White-winged crossbill Loxia leucoptera PAS

Savannah sparrow Passerculus sandwichensis no

Mammals:

Virginia opossum Didelphis virginiana no

Masked shrew Sorex cinereus no

Merriam's shrew Sorex merriami no

Montane shrew Sorex monticolus no

Preble's shrew Sorex preblei Fine

Pygmy shrew Sorex hoyi Fine

Trowbridge's shrew Sorex trowbridgii no

Vagrant shrew Sorex vagrans no

Water shrew Sorex palustris Fine

Broad-footed mole Scapanus latimanus Fine

Coast mole Scapanus orarius no

Shrew-mole Neurotrichus gibbsii Fine

Big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus no

California myotis Myotis californicus no

Fringed myotis Myotis thysanodes BSM

Hoary bat Lasiurus cinereus BSM

Little brown myotis Myotis lucifugus no

Long-eared myotis Myotis evotis BSM

Long-legged myotis Myotis volans BSM

Pale western big-eared bat Plecotus townsendii pallescens BSM

Pallid bat Antrozous pallidus no

Silver-haired bat Lasionycteris noctivagans BSM

Spotted bat Euderma maculatum BSM

Western pipistrelle Pipistrellus hesperus no

Western small-footed myotis Myotis ciliolabrum BSM

Yuma myotis Myotis yumanensis Fine

Brazilian free-tailed bat Tadarida brasiliensis Fine

American pika Ochotona princeps no

Black-tailed jackrabbit Lepus californicus no

Eastern cottontail Sylvilagus floridanus no

Mountain cottontail Sylvilagus nuttallii no

Terrestrial ?13
Common name Scientific name Evaluation1

Pygmy rabbit Brachylagus idahoensis BSM

Snowshoe hare Lepus americanus no

White-tailed jackrabbit Lepus townsendii BSM

Mountain beaver Aplodontia rufa Fine

Belding's ground squirrel Spermophilus beldlngi no

California ground squirrel Spermophilus beecheyi no

Cascade golden-mantled ground squirrel Spermophilus saturatus no

Cliff chipmunk Tarn/as dorsalis Fine

Columbian ground squirrel Spermophilus columbianus no

Douglas' squirrel Tamiasciurus douglasii no

Eastern fox squirrel Sciurus niger no

Golden-mantled ground squirrel Spermophilus lateralis no

Hoary marmot Marmota caligata no

Idaho ground squirrel Spermophilus brunneus Fine

Least chipmunk Tarn/as minimus no

Northern flying squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus BSM

Red squirrel Tamiasciurus hudsonicus no

Red-tailed chipmunk Tarn/as ruficaudus no

Townsend's ground squirrel Spermophilus townsendii no

Uinta chipmunk Tarn/as umbrinus Fine

Uinta ground squirrel Spermophilus armatus Fine

Washington ground squirrel Spermophilus Washington! Fine

Western gray squirrel Sciurus griseus Fine

White-tailed antelope squirrel Ammospermophilus leucurus Fine

Wyoming ground squirrel Spermophilus elegans nevadensis no

Yellow-bellied marmot Marmota flaviventris no

Yellow-pine chipmunk Tamias amoenus no

Botta's pocket gopher Thomomys bottae Fine

Brushprairie pocket gopher Thomomys talpoides douglasi Fine

Northern pocket gopher Thomomys talpoides no

Townsend's pocket gopher Thomomys townsendii no

Western pocket gopher Thomomys mazama no

White salmon pocket gopher Thomomys talpoides limosus Fine

California kangaroo rat Dipodomys californicus no

Chisel-toothed kangaroo rat Dipodomys microps no

Dark kangaroo mouse Microdipodops megacephalus no

Great basin pocket mouse Perognathus pan/us no

Little pocket mouse Perognathus longimembris no

Ord's kangaroo rat Dipodomys ordii no

Beaver Castor canadensis no

Black rat Rattus rattus no

Bushy-tailed woodrat Neotoma cinerea no

Canyon mouse Peromyscus crinitus no

Columbian mouse Peromyscus keenii no

Common muskrat Ondatra zibethicus no

Creeping vole Microtus oregoni no

Deer mouse Peromyscus maniculatus no

Desert woodrat Neotoma lepida no

Dusky-footed woodrat Neotoma fuscipes Fine

Heather vole Phenacomys intermedius no

House mouse Mus musculus no

Long-tailed vole Microtus longicaudus no

Meadow vole Microtus pennsylvanicus no

Montane vole Microtus montanus no

714 Terrestrial
Common name Scientific name Evaluation1

Northern bog lemming Synaptomys borealis Fine

Northern grasshopper mouse Onychomys leucogaster no

Norway rat Rattus norvegicus no

Pinyon mouse Peromyscus truei Fine

Potholes meadow vole Microtus pennsylvanicus kincaidi Fine

Sagebrush vole Lemmiscus curtatus no

Southern red-backed vole Clethrionomys gapperi no

Water vole Microtus richardsoni no

Western harvest mouse Reithrodontomys megalotis no

Western red-backed vole Clethrionomys califomicus no

Pacific jumping mouse Zapus trinotatus Fine

Western jumping mouse Zapus princeps no

Common porcupine Erethizon dorsatum no

Nutria Myocastor coypus no

Common gray fox Urocyon cinereoargenteus Fine

Coyote Canis latrans no

Gray wolf Canis lupus C&U

Kit fox Vulpes velox Fine

Red fox Vulpes vulpes no

Black bear Ursus americanus no

Grizzly bear Ursus arctos C&U

Common raccoon Procyon lotor no

American badger Taxidea taxus no

American marten Maries americana C&U

Ermine Mustela erminea no

Fisher Martes pennant! C&U

Long-tailed weasel Mustela frenata no

Mink Mustela vison no

Northern river otter Lutra canadensis no

Striped skunk Mephitis mephitis no

Western spotted skunk Spilogale gracilis no

Wolverine Gulo gulo C&U

Bobcat Lynx rufus no

Lynx Lynx lynx C&U

Mountain lion Felis concolor no

Feral horse Equus caballus no

Black-tailed deer Odocoileus hemionus columbianus no

Moose Alces alces no

Mule deer Odocoileus hemionus no

Rocky mountain elk Cervus elaphus nelsonii no

White-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus no

Woodland caribou Rangifer tarandus caribou C&U

Pronghorn Antilocapra americana C&U

American bison Bos bison no

California bighorn sheep Ovis canadensis californiana C&U

Mountain goat Oreamnos americanus no

Rocky mountain bighorn sheep Ovis canadensis canadensis no

Reptiles:

Painted turtle Chrysemys picta HER

Western pond turtle Clemmys marmorata HER

Northern alligator lizard Elgaria coerulea no

Southern alligator lizard Elgaria multicarinata no

Desert horned lizard Phrynosoma platyrhinos HER

Terrestrial 715
Common name Scientific name Evaluation1

Longnose leopard lizard Gambelia wislizenii HER

Mojave black-collared lizard Crotaphytus bicinctores HER

Sagebrush lizard Sceloporus graciosus graciosus HER

Short-horned lizard Phrynosoma douglassii HER

Side-blotched lizard Ufa stansburiana no

Western fence lizard Sceloporus occidentalis no

Western skink Eumeces skiltonianus no

Plateau striped whiptail Cnemidophorus velox no

Western whiptail Cnemidophorus tigris no

Rubber boa Charina bottae HER

California mountain kingsnake Lampropeltis zonata Fine

Common garter snake Thamnophis sirtalis HER

Gopher snake Pituophis catenifer no

Ground snake Sonora semiannulata Fine

Longnose snake Rhinocheilus lecontei Fine

Night snake Hypsiglena torquata HER

Racer Coluber constrictor no

Ringneck snake Diadophls punctatus HER

Sharptail snake Contia tenuls HER

Striped whipsnake Masticophis taeniatus HER

Western terrestrial garter snake Thamnophis elegans no

Western rattlesnake Crotalus viridis no

'Evaluation: BSM - bat and small mammal panel; CAV - cavity nesting woodpeckers, swifts, and nuthatches; C&U - mammalian carnivore and

ungulate panel; HER - amphibian and reptile panel; PAS - passerine and other birds; RGB - raptor and game bird panel; WAT - waterbird and

shorebird panel; "Fine" - recommended for fine-scale analysis by Forests or BLM units; "no" - no panel analysis done, and not recommended for

fine-scale analysis.

718 Terrestrial
Appendix 4-D

^•^^^•••••^^^^^^^^^^^^^••••••^^•^•••••••MMHPSgtairKo .1 <*-••. - " -

Standard deviation of mean outcome of management alternatives for selected vascular plant and vertebrate

species in the Interior Columbia River Basin assessment area. Mean outcomes were calculated as the mean

of outcomes weighted by likelihood scores averaged across all panelists.

Period / Alternative4

Panel1 Group2 Species Name Area3 H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

PLT PLT Astragalus mulfordiae EEIS BLM/FS 0.40 0.49 0.60 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67

EElSCumEff 0.40 0.67 0.60 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.75 0.67 0.67

UCRB BLM/FS 0.40 0.46 0.60 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67

UCRBCumEff 0.40 0.49 0.64 0.75 0.75 0.74 0.75 0.74 0.75

PLT PLT Astragalus oniciformis UCRB BLM/FS 0.30 0.49 0.75 0.75 0.59 0.67 0.59 0.67 0.67

UCRBCumEff 0.30 0.49 0.59 0.59 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67

PLT PLT Astragalus paysonii UCRB BLM/FS 0.40 0.46 0.46 0.49 0.36 0.30 0.36 0.30 0.36

UCRBCumEff 0.40 0.46 0.46 0.49 0.36 0.30 0.36 0.30 0.36

PLT PLT Astragalus solitarius EEIS BLM/FS 0.40 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.40 0.46 0.40 0.46

EElSCumEff 0.40 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.40 0.46 0.40 0.46

PLT PLT Astragalus

yoder-williamsii UCRB BLM/FS 0.30 0.67 0.64 0.67 0.67 0.48 0.64 0.48 0.64

UCRBCumEff 0.30 0.67 0.64 0.67 0.67 0.48 0.64 0.48 0.64

PLT PLT Botrychium ascendens EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.40

UCRB BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.46 0.49 0.46 0.49 0.46

UCRBCumEff 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49

PLT PLT Botrychium crenulatum EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.83 0.67 0.67 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.67

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.50 0.83 0.67 0.67 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.67

UCRB BLM/FS 0.49 0.49 0.67 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.67 0.75 0.75

UCRBCumEff 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49

PLT PLT Botrychium paradoxum EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49

UCRB BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49

PLT PLT Calochortus

longebartatus

var. longebarbatus EEIS BLM/FS 0.40 0.46 0.50 0.48 0.48 0.49 0.50 0.49 0.48

EElSCumEff 0.40 0.48 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.49

PLT PLT Calochortus

longebarbatus

var.peckii EEIS BLM/FS 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.46 0.40 0.30

EElSCumEff 0.00 0.44 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.46 0.40 0.30

PLT PLT Calochortus nitidus EEIS BLM/FS 0.49 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.40

EElSCumEff 0.49 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.40

UCRB BLM/FS 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.30 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.40

UCRBCumEff 0.46 0.67 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.30

PLT PLT Castilleja chlorotica EEIS BLM/FS 0.30 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.46

EElSCumEff 0.30 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.48

Terrestrial 717
Period / Alternative4

Panel' Group2 Species Name Area3 H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

PLT PLT Collomia mazama EEIS BLM/FS 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.30 0.40 0.30 0.30

EElSCumEff 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.30 0.40 0.30 0.30

PLT PLT Cypripedium

fasciculatum EEIS BLM/FS 0.46 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.46

EElSCumEff 0.46 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66

UCRB BLM/FS 0.46 0.64 0.67 0.67 0.36 0.30 0.36 0.30 0.40

UCRBCumEff 0.49 0.67 0.67 0.64 0.67 0.48 0.67 0.48 0.36

PLT PLT Grindelia howellii UCRB BLM/FS 0.00 0.50 0.49 0.44 0.40 0.46 0.40 0.46 0.46

UCRBCumEff 0.49 0.49 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36

PLT PLT Hackelia cronquistii EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.49 0.60 0.56 0.54 0.59 0.56 0.66 0.66

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.49 0.46 0.48 0.49

PLT PLT Haplopappus liatriformis UCRB BLM/FS 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30

UCRBCumEff 0.40 0.36 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30

PLT PLT Howellia aquatilis EEIS BLM/FS 0.40 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44

EElSCumEff 0.49 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78

UCRB BLM/FS 0.30 0.48 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.48

UCRBCumEff 0.30 0.48 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.48

PLT PLT Lomatium suksdorfii EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.49 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49

PLT PLT Mimulus pygmaeus EEIS BLM/FS 0.30 0.40 0.40 0.36 0.40 0.36 0.40 0.36 0.40

EElSCumEff 0.30 0.40 0.40 0.36 0.40 0.36 0.40 0.36 0.40

PLT PLT Mimulus

washingtonensis

var. washingtonensis EEIS BLM/FS 0.46 0.40 0.40 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.40

EElSCumEff 0.46 0.40 0.40 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.40

PLT PLT Mirabilis macfarlanei EEIS BLM/FS 0.30 0.32 0.32 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.54

EElSCumEff 0.30 0.50 0.64 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.54

UCRB BLM/FS 0.30 0.51 0.51 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.46

UCRBCumEff 0.30 0.45 0.45 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54

PLT PLT Penstemon glaucinus EEIS BLM/FS 0.49 0.46 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.44

EElSCumEff 0.49 0.46 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.44

PLT PLT Penstemon lemhiensis UCRB BLM/FS 0.46 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.40 0.30 0.40 0.30 0.49

UCRBCumEff 0.46 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.46 0.40 0.46 0.40 0.49

PLT PLT Polemonium pectinatum EEIS BLM/FS 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.40 0.30 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22

PLT PLT Silene spaldingii EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30

PLT PLT Stephanomeria

malheurensis EEIS BLM/FS 0.00 0.0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

718 Terrestrial
Period / Alternative"

Panel' Group2 Species Name Area3 H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

PLT PLT Trifolium thompsonii EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

HER AMP Coeur d'Alene

salamander UCRB BLM/FS 0.64 0.68 0.50 0.54 0.46 0.51 0.50 0.51 0.50

UCRBCumEff 0.64 0.54 0.36 0.42 0.42 0.45 0.36 0.47 0.56

HER AMP Northern leopard frog EEIS BLM/FS 0.69 0.77 0.45 0.67 0.49 0.74 0.48 0.74 0.78

EElSCumEff 0.69 0.77 0.17 0.22 0.22 0.27 0.17 0.27 0.36

UCRB BLM/FS 0.91 0.46 0.26 0.67 0.49 0.78 0.46 0.80 0.89

UCRBCumEff 0.91 0.42 0.17 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.17 0.22 0.36

HER AMP Spotted frog species A EEIS BLM/FS 0.67 0.67 0.70 0.74 0.67 0.73 0.71 0.77 0.77

EElSCumEff 0.67 0.67 0.70 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.71 0.72 0.67

HER AMP Spotted frog species B EEIS BLM/FS 1.08 0.67 0.70 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.58 0.67 0.53

EElSCumEff 1.08 0.67 0.67 0.62 0.61 0.62 0.55 0.62 0.67

UCRB BLM/FS 0.89 0.70 0.67 0.60 0.63 0.67 0.54 0.67 0.59

UCRBCumEff 0.89 0.70 0.58 0.63 0.65 0.63 0.49 0.63 0.67

HER AMP Tailed frog EEIS BLM/FS 0.93 0.91 0.43 0.91 0.86 0.94 0.64 0.94 0.94

EElSCumEff 0.93 0.91 0.44 0.62 0.65 0.65 0.67 0.65 0.62

UCRB BLM/FS 0.88 0.94 0.72 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.73 0.90 0.88

UCRBCumEff 0.88 0.94 0.88 0.68 0.72 0.78 0.86 0.78 0.72

HER AMP Western toad EEIS BLM/FS 0.70 0.73 0.80 0.61 0.58 0.64 0.80 0.64 0.71

EElSCumEff 0.70 0.89 0.91 0.74 0.74 0.80 0.90 0.80 0.84

UCRB BLM/FS 0.88 0.88 0.83 0.91 0.94 0.98 0.81 0.93 0.95

UCRBCumEff 0.88 0.92 0.98 0.84 0.86 0.84 0.81 0.82 0.95

HER AMP Woodhouse's toad EEIS BLM/FS 0.59 0.58 0.59 0.81 0.74 0.85 0.59 0.81 0.80

EElSCumEff 0.59 0.58 0.46 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.48 0.50 0.50

UCRB BLM/FS 0.71 0.54 0.58 0.81 0.74 0.85 0.58 0.81 0.80

UCRBCumEff 0.71 0.54 0.46 0.48 0.48 0.19 0.46 0.19 0.50

HER REP Common garter snake EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

UCRB BLM/FS 0.50 0.67 0.70 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.70 0.67 0.54

UCRBCumEff 0.50 0.77 1.00 0.69 0.69 0.69 1.00 0.69 0.77

HER REP Desert horned lizard EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.50

UCRB BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.50

UCRBCumEff 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.50

HER REP Longnose leopard lizard EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.60 0.64 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.64 0.60 0.63

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.63 0.67 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.67 0.63 0.60

UCRB BLM/FS 0.50 0.60 0.64 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.64 0.60 0.63

UCRBCumEff 0.50 0.63 0.67 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.67 0.63 0.60

HER REP Mojave black-collared

lizard EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

UCRB BLM/FS 0.50 0.60 0.64 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.64 0.60 0.63

UCRBCumEff 0.88 0.75 0.75 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.75 0.63 0.60

Terrestrial 719
Period / Alternative4

Panel1 Group2 Species Name Area3 H C A1 A2 A3 A4 AS A6 A7

HER REP Night snake UCRB BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.50

UCRBCumEff 0.50 0.49 0.48 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.48 0.49 0.50

HER REP Painted turtle EEIS BLM/FS 0.59 0.58 0.68 0.77 0.77 0.59 0.68 0.59 0.59

EElSCumEff 0.59 0.77 0.95 1.03 1.03 0.75 0.91 0.75 0.73

UCRB BLM/FS 0.50 0.48 0.58 0.66 0.70 0.49 0.58 0.43 0.50

UCRBCumEff 0.50 0.73 0.91 0.97 0.87 0.62 0.91 0.72 0.65

HER REP Rubber boa EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.30 0.50 0.50 0.64 0.30 0.64 0.70

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.50 0.30 0.50 0.50 0.64 0.30 0.64 0.70

UCRB BLM/FS 0.71 0.36 0.44 0.36 0.36 0.48 0.44 0.48 0.68

UCRBCumEff 0.71 0.50 0.72 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.72 0.67 0.51

HER REP Sagebrush lizard EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

UCRB BLM/FS 0.50 0.49 0.48 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.48 0.49 0.50

UCRBCumEff 0.50 0.78 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.75 0.77 0.78

HER REP Sharptail snake EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.46 0.59 0.59 0.66 0.49 0.75 0.70

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.50

HER REP Short-horned lizard EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

UCRB BLM/FS 0.50 0.49 0.46 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.46 0.49 0.50

UCRBCumEff 0.50 0.48 0.46 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.46 0.48 0.50

HER REP Striped whipsnake EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

UCRB BLM/FS 0.50 0.63 0.66 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.66 0.63 0.64

UCRBCumEff 0.50 0.63 0.66 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.66 0.60 0.63

HER REP Western pond turtle EEIS BLM/FS 0.83 0.80 0.90 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.70 0.75 0.75

EElSCumEff 0.83 0.67 0.30 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.30 0.67 0.67

WAT WAT Group 1: Open water

birds EEIS BLM/FS 0.30 0.64 0.69 0.63 0.63 0.64 0.59 0.64 0.61

EElSCumEff 0.31 0.69 0.69 0.66 0.64 0.68 0.56 0.68 0.63

UCRB BLM/FS 0.42 0.69 0.70 0.58 0.58 0.65 0.70 0.65 0.55

UCRBCumEff 0.45 0.72 0.73 0.60 0.60 0.70 0.72 0.70 0.59

WAT WAT Group 2: Common loon EEIS BLM/FS 0.44 0.49 0.61 0.57 0.57 0.58 0.57 0.58 0.57

EElSCumEff 0.61 0.73 0.81 0.73 0.72 0.72 0.73 0.72 0.73

UCRB BLM/FS 0.39 0.50 0.64 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58

UCRBCumEff 0.49 0.74 0.89 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74

WAT WAT Group 3: Wood duck,

mergansers EEIS BLM/FS 0.54 0.83 0.82 0.80 0.81 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.81

EElSCumEff 0.51 0.81 0.85 0.77 0.80 0.83 0.82 0.82 0.79

UCRB BLM/FS 0.51 0.97 1.00 1.03 1.01 0.90 0.97 0.90 0.95

UCRBCumEff 0.53 0.99 1.11 1.14 1.12 0.87 1.09 0.87 1.06

WAT WAT Group 4: Goldeneyes EEIS BLM/FS 0.49 0.52 0.60 0.57 0.59 0.54 0.53 0.54 0.55

EElSCumEff 0.49 0.54 0.59 0.61 0.67 0.53 0.57 0.53 0.55

UCRB BLM/FS 0.50 0.54 0.58 0.58 0.63 0.58 0.55 0.58 0.52

UCRBCumEff 0.50 0.57 0.60 0.58 0.67 0.57 0.58 0.57 0.52

728 Terrestrial
Period / Alternative4

Panel1 Group2 Species Name Area3 H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

WAT WAT Group 5: Western snowy

plover EEISBLM/FS 0.00 0 0.33 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.30 0.17 0.00

EElSCumEff 0.00 0.30 0.39 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.38 0.30 0.30

WAT WAT Group 6: Harlequin

duck EEISBLM/FS 0.49 0.50 0.39 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.66

EElSCumEff 0.46 0.50 0.36 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.64

UCRBBLM/FS 0.75 0.50 0.41 0.49 0.50 0.64 0.50 0.64 0.66

UCRBCumEff 0.75 0.49 0.38 0.50 0.50 0.72 0.50 0.73 0.63

WAT WAT Group 7: Herons,

egrets EEISBLM/FS 0.00 0.61 0.57 0.56 0.57 0.53 0.46 0.53 0.59

EElSCumEff 0.00 0.68 0.60 0.63 0.59 0.61 0.53 0.61 0.66

UCRBBLM/FS 0.40 0.56 0.61 0.51 0.51 0.52 0.56 0.52 0.52

UCRBCumEff 0.39 0.56 0.61 0.52 0.52 0.56 0.57 0.56 0.53

WAT WAT Group 8: Dabbling

ducks EEISBLM/FS 0.46 0.67 0.71 0.62 0.61 0.52 0.64 0.52 0.58

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.69 0.75 0.64 0.62 0.58 0.65 0.58 0.58

UCRBBLM/FS 0.42 0.57 0.64 0.56 0.53 0.58 0.56 0.58 0.56

UCRBCumEff 0.44 0.66 0.72 0.61 0.61 0.58 0.65 0.58 0.60

WAT WAT Group 9: Spotted

sandpiper EEISBLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.60 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.50 0.61 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

UCRBBLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.60 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

UCRBCumEff 0.50 0.50 0.61 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.49 0.49

WAT WAT Group 10: Greater

sandhill crane EEISBLM/FS 0.44 0.50 0.49 0.36 0.36 0.38 0.50 0.38 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.35 0.55 0.59 0.55 0.55 0.51 0.43 0.51 0.43

UCRBBLM/FS 0.52 0.60 0.56 0.57 0.57 0.47 0.58 0.47 0.47

UCRBCumEff 0.54 0.44 0.44 0.56 0.56 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.57

WAT WAT Group 11: Rails,

avocets EEISBLM/FS 0.46 0.50 0.63 0.54 0.54 0.48 0.54 0.48 0.54

EElSCumEff 0.57 0.53 0.66 0.57 0.57 0.49 0.58 0.50 0.58

UCRBBLM/FS 0.49 0.50 0.60 0.52 0.52 0.49 0.52 0.49 0.52

UCRBCumEff 0.53 0.54 0.64 0.56 0.56 0.50 0.56 0.50 0.56

WAT WAT Group 12: Curlew, willet EEISBLM/FS 0.25 0.30 0.25 0.34 0.34 0.41 0.29 0.41 0.34

EElSCumEff 0.29 0.35 0.28 0.37 0.37 0.43 0.34 0.43 0.39

UCRBBLM/FS 0.25 0.30 0.25 0.34 0.34 0.02 0.29 0.02 0.34

UCRBCumEff 0.29 0.35 0.28 0.37 0.37 0.43 0.34 0.43 0.39

WAT WAT Group 13: Upland

sandpiper EEISBLM/FS 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.30 0.44 0.30 0.44 0.36

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.14

UCRBBLM/FS 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.30 0.44 0.30 0.44 0.36

UCRBCumEff 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.14

WAT WAT Group 14: Common

snipe EEIS BLM/FS 0.49 0.56 0.66 0.64 0.64 0.57 0.63 0.58 0.61

EElSCumEff 0.48 0.58 0.67 0.65 0.65 0.57 0.65 0.58 0.61

UCRBBLM/FS 0.49 0.56 0.66 0.60 0.60 0.57 0.59 0.58 0.61

UCRB CumEff 0.48 0.58 0.67 0.65 0.65 0.57 0.65 .0.58 0.61

Terrestrial 721
Period / Alternative"

Panel1 Group2 Species Name Area3 H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

WAT WAT Group 15: Migrant

sandpipers EEIS BLM/FS 0.68 0.70 0.73 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.69 0.72 0.72

EElSCumEff 0.68 0.69 0.72 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69

UCRB BLM/FS 0.65 0.62 0.61 0.62 0.62 0.68 0.58 0.68 0.62

UCRBCumEff 0.67 0.67 0.68 0.67 0.67 0.66 0.65 0.66 0.66

RGB GMB Band-tailed pigeon EEIS BLM/FS 0.89 0.92 0.80 0.82 0.99 0.96 0.97 1.00 0.84

EElSCumEff 0.90 0.91 0.79 0.78 1.01 1.00 0.97 1.01 0.83

UCRB BLM/FS 0.77 0.87 0.78 0.74 0.86 0.87 0.83 0.87 0.97

UCRBCumEff 0.77 0.83 0.76 0.72 0.90 0.89 0.90 0.89 0.90

RGB GMB Blue grouse EEIS BLM/FS 0.70 0.69 0.79 0.79 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.63

EElSCumEff 0.70 0.69 0.82 0.81 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.64

UCRB BLM/FS 0.54 0.68 0.81 0.81 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.66

UCRBCumEff 0.50 0.68 0.72 0.72 0.66 0.66 0.67 0.65 0.64

RGB GMB Columbian sharp-tailed

grouse EEIS BLM/FS 0.44 0.47 0.52 0.52 0.75 0.70 0.73 0.70 0.69

EElSCumEff 0.43 0.52 0.54 0.53 0.80 0.77 0.78 0.78 0.80

UCRB BLM/FS 0.49 0.52 0.53 0.53 0.72 0.69 0.70 0.71 0.69

UCRBCumEff 0.48 0.53 0.54 0.54 0.74 0.73 0.73 0.75 0.76

RGB GMB Mountain quail EEIS BLM/FS 0.76 0.71 0.73 0.72 0.70 0.75 0.68 0.74 0.80

EElSCumEff 0.60 0.61 0.59 0.59 0.54 0.50 0.55 0.50 0.54

UCRB BLM/FS 0.92 0.39 0.48 0.50 0.64 0.70 0.61 0.70 0.64

UCRBCumEff 0.85 0.48 0.52 0.54 0.64 0.68 0.63 0.67 0.64

RGB GMB Sage grouse EEIS BLM/FS 0.56 0.75 0.70 0.73 0.91 0.77 0.86 0.80 0.74

EElSCumEff 0.56 0.79 0.72 0.72 0.81 0.73 0.76 0.76 0.73

UCRB BLM/FS 0.57 0.70 0.68 0.73 0.95 0.81 0.91 0.82 0.76

UCRBCumEff 0.56 0.73 0.68 0.73 0.73 0.74 0.72 0.75 0.72

RGB RAP Bald eagle EEIS BLM/FS 0.59 0.76 0.77 0.61 0.57 0.54 0.55 0.54 0.55

EElSCumEff 0.60 0.68 0.78 0.64 0.60 0.57 0.59 0.58 0.58

UCRB BLM/FS 0.59 0.76 0.77 0.61 0.57 0.54 0.55 0.54 0.55

UCRBCumEff 0.60 0.68 0.78 0.64 0.60 0.57 0.59 0.58 0.58

RGB RAP Barred owl EEIS BLM/FS 0.87 0.61 0.78 0.81 0.74 0.78 0.75 0.74 0.68

EElSCumEff 0.54 0.59 0.81 0.77 0.85 0.88 0.85 0.87 0.70

UCRB BLM/FS 0.70 0.82 0.72 0.78 0.77 0.76 0.63 0.76 0.64

UCRBCumEff 0.35 0.96 0.76 0.78 0.83 0.81 0.83 0.79 0.77

RGB RAP Boreal owl EEIS BLM/FS 0.95 0.74 0.80 0.79 0.84 0.85 0.84 0.85 0.89

EElSCumEff 0.76 0.79 0.81 0.80 0.81 0.81 0.82 0.81 0.90

UCRB BLM/FS 0.87 0.95 0.94 0.93 0.92 0.93 0.92 0.88 0.85

UCRBCumEff 0.92 0.94 0.92 0.90 0.79 0.79 0.81 0.76 0.76

RGB RAP Burrowing owl EEIS BLM/FS 0.61 0.84 0.83 0.83 0.73 0.73 0.74 0.74 0.73

EElSCumEff 0.55 0.73 0.76 0.76 0.72 0.71 0.73 0.71 0.75

UCRB BLM/FS 0.61 0.85 0.88 0.89 0.72 0.72 0.73 0.73 0.73

UCRBCumEff 0.57 0.74 0.74 0.75 0.70 0.69 0.71 0.69 0.73

RGB RAP Cooper's hawk EEIS BLM/FS 0.73 0.75 0.76 0.75 0.81 0.70 0.81 0.70 0.82

EElSCumEff 0.64 0.74 0.78 0.76 0.73 0.63 0.73 0.63 0.73

UCRB BLM/FS 0.73 0.76 0.79 0.79 0.82 0.70 0.82 0.70 0.82

UCRBCumEff 0.64 0.72 0.76 0.75 0.72 0.61 0.72 0.61 0.71

722 Terrestrial
Period / Alternative"

Panel1 Group2 Species Name Area3 H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

RGB RAP Ferruginous hawk EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.71 0.70 0.76 0.57 0.54 0.57 0.54 0.57

EElSCumEff 0.52 0.53 0.50 0.51 0.49 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.50

UCRB BLM/FS 0.51 0.70 0.69 0.75 0.56 0.54 0.57 0.54 0.56

UCRBCumEff 0.52 0.53 0.50 0.51 0.49 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.50

RGB RAP Flammulated owl EEIS BLM/FS 0.49 0.79 0.78 0.81 0.75 0.65 0.74 0.67 0.81

EElSCumEff 0.49 0.79 0.78 0.79 0.74 0.64 0.74 0.67 0.80

UCRB BLM/FS 0.49 0.79 0.78 0.81 0.75 0.65 0.74 0.67 0.81

UCRBCumEff 0.49 0.79 0.78 0.81 0.75 0.65 0.74 0.67 0.81

RGB RAP Great gray owl EEIS BLM/FS 0.75 0.84 0.76 0.83 0.64 0.61 0.66 0.61 0.80

EElSCumEff 0.77 0.89 0.86 0.84 0.73 0.69 0.74 0.69 0.88

UCRB BLM/FS 0.67 0.76 0.82 0.84 0.75 0.67 0.69 0.67 0.79

UCRBCumEff 0.74 0.77 0.87 0.86 0.77 0.70 0.72 0.70 0.82

RGB RAP Long-eared owl EEIS BLM/FS 0.78 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.71 0.81 0.79 0.81 0.80

EElSCumEff 0.78 0.77 0.81 0.73 0.70 0.62 0.70 0.62 0.74

UCRB BLM/FS 0.78 0.70 0.69 0.77 0.75 0.71 0.75 0.77 0.64

UCRBCumEff 0.74 0.65 0.76 0.74 0.67 0.69 0.56 0.74 0.64

RGB RAP Merlin EEIS BLM/FS 0.70 0.75 0.76 0.77 0.74 0.70 0.73 0.70 0.74

EElSCumEff 0.66 0.73 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.70 0.72 0.70 0.74

UCRB BLM/FS 0.69 0.69 0.71 0.71 0.69 0.69 0.67 0.69 0.66

UCRBCumEff 0.66 0.71 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.68 0.69 0.67

RGB RAP Northern goshawk EEIS BLM/FS 0.67 0.80 0.80 0.77 0.78 0.81 0.77 0.79 0.79

EElSCumEff 0.67 0.76 0.74 0.72 0.76 0.81 0.73 0.74 0.74

UCRB BLM/FS 0.66 0.87 0.71 0.68 0.69 0.75 0.67 0.73 0.66

UCRBCumEff 0.69 0.86 0.70 0.69 0.69 0.76 0.68 0.75 0.72

RGB RAP Northern pygmy-owl EEIS BLM/FS 0.48 0.55 0.56 0.53 0.54 0.52 0.54 0.52 0.56

EElSCumEff 0.48 0.53 0.55 0.52 0.52 0.49 0.52 0.49 0.52

UCRB BLM/FS 0.45 0.57 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.51 0.54 0.51 0.56

UCRBCumEff 0.46 0.54 0.53 0.52 0.52 0.47 0.52 0.47 0.52

RGB RAP Northern saw-whet owl EEIS BLM/FS 0.51 0.59 0.61 0.60 0.67 0.61 0.67 0.59 0.62

EElSCumEff 0.49 0.58 0.59 0.57 0.64 0.58 0.64 0.53 0.59

UCRB BLM/FS 0.45 0.60 0.59 0.60 0.64 0.58 0.64 0.55 0.62

UCRBCumEff 0.43 0.59 0.56 0.58 0.61 0.54 0.61 0.48 0.59

RGB RAP Swainson's hawk EEIS BLM/FS 0.73 0.69 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.66 0.67 0.65 0.65

EElSCumEff 0.73 0.74 0.73 0.73 0.71 0.68 0.71 0.65 0.69

UCRB BLM/FS 0.77 0.69 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.66 0.67 0.65 0.65

UCRBCumEff 0.77 0.74 0.73 0.73 0.71 0.68 0.71 0.65 0.69

RGB RAP Western screech owl EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.61 0.57 0.58 0.58 0.52 0.58 0.50 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.49 0.62 0.57 0.58 0.57 0.50 0.56 0.50 0.50

UCRB BLM/FS 0.50 0.61 0.57 0.58 0.58 0.52 0.58 0.50 0.50

UCRBCumEff 0.49 0.63 0.59 0.58 0.57 0.50 0.56 0.50 0.50

CAV CAV Black-backed

woodpecker EEIS BLM/FS 0.40 0.26 0.51 0.45 0.50 0.44 0.56 0.44 0.44

EElSCumEff 0.40 0.40 0.66 0.54 0.58 0.46 0.59 0.46 0.44

UCRB BLM/FS 0.40 0.44 0.73 0.55 0.58 0.48 0.54 0.58 0.41

UCRBCumEff 0.40 0.40 0.63 0.44 0.44 0.48 0.58 0.59 0.55

Terrestrial 723
Period / Alternative"

Panel1 Group2 Species Name Area3 H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

CAV CAV Downy woodpecker EEIS BLM/FS 0.44 0.46 0.54 0.41 0.36 0.39 0.51 0.42 0.36

EElSCumEff 0.44 0.44 0.50 0.33 0.33 0.39 0.55 0.36 0.38

UCRB BLM/FS 0.44 0.39 0.34 0.45 0.51 0.39 0.58 0.42 0.35

UCRBCumEff 0.44 0.46 0.30 0.45 0.51 0.39 0.54 0.36 0.35

CAV CAV Hairy woodpecker EEIS BLM/FS 0.26 0.40 0.50 0.48 0.44 0.44 0.43 0.49 0.40

EElSCumEff 0.36 0.31 0.43 0.44 0.44 0.49 0.43 0.49 0.46

UCRB BLM/FS 0.26 0.36 0.50 0.48 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.48 0.32

UCRBCumEff 0.26 0.36 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.43 0.50 0.48 0.44

CAV CAV Lewis'woodpecker EEIS BLM/FS 0.65 0.67 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.63 0.63 0.56 0.61

EElSCumEff 0.83 0.83 0.42 0.55 0.59 0.55 0.49 0.50 0.50

UCRB BLM/FS 0.70 0.74 0.50 0.49 0.40 0.66 0.71 0.64 0.56

UCRBCumEff 0.98 1.08 0.44 0.64 0.63 0.40 0.50 0.44 0.44

CAV CAV Pileated woodpecker EEIS BLM/FS 0.76 0.67 0.17 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.58 0.50 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.76 0.67 0.17 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.58 0.50 0.50

UCRB BLM/FS 0.71 0.73 0.17 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.51 0.50 0.50

UCRBCumEff 0.71 0.73 0.17 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.51 0.50 0.50

CAV CAV Pygmy nuthatch EEIS BLM/FS 0.26 0.17 0.41 0.56 0.63 0.50 0.68 0.50 0.35

EElSCumEff 0.26 0.17 0.41 0.56 0.63 0.50 0.68 0.50 0.35

UCRB BLM/FS 0.26 0.17 0.41 0.56 0.66 0.49 0.63 0.49 0.35

UCRBCumEff 0.26 0.17 0.41 0.56 0.66 0.49 0.63 0.49 0.35

CAV CAV Red-naped sapsucker EEIS BLM/FS 0.00 0.44 0.82 0.44 0.52 0.46 0.70 0.46 0.66

EElSCumEff 0.00 0.44 0.71 0.37 0.47 0.44 0.57 0.44 0.62

UCRB BLM/FS 0.00 0.44 0.82 0.44 0.52 0.46 0.70 0.46 0.66

UCRBCumEff 0.00 0.44 0.71 0.37 0.47 0.44 0.57 0.44 0.62

CAV CAV Three-toed woodpecker EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.32 0.64 0.44 0.52 0.19 0.35 0.35 0.45

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.20 0.64 0.44 0.52 0.19 0.35 0.35 0.45

UCRB BLM/FS 0.50 0.32 0.64 0.39 0.50 0.19 0.35 0.35 0.42

UCRBCumEff 0.50 0.20 0.64 0.39 0.50 0.19 0.35 0.35 0.42

CAV CAV Vaux's swift EEIS BLM/FS 0.92 0.45 0.50 0.56 0.74 0.58 0.44 0.38 0.36

EElSCumEff 0.54 0.26 0.44 0.59 0.50 0.54 0.50 0.32 0.64

UCRB BLM/FS 1.05 0.40 0.50 0.56 0.72 0.53 0.44 0.38 0.36

UCRBCumEff 0.62 0.34 0.44 0.59 0.50 0.54 0.50 0.32 0.64

CAV CAV White-breasted

nuthatch EEIS BLM/FS 0.26 0.20 0.41 0.34 0.45 0.40 0.36 0.46 0.41

EElSCumEff 0.26 0.27 0.41 0.34 0.45 0.32 0.36 0.39 0.41

UCRB BLM/FS 0.38 0.30 0.49 0.32 0.52 0.45 0.49 0.49 0.63

UCRBCumEff 0.38 0.30 0.49 0.32 0.52 0.45 0.49 0.49 0.63

CAV CAV White-headed

woodpecker EEIS BLM/FS 0.43 0.54 0.44 0.51 0.74 0.39 0.77 0.48 0.66

EElSCumEff 0.43 0.54 0.51 0.55 0.51 0.44 0.73 0.46 0.70

UCRB BLM/FS 0.43 0.53 0.44 0.51 0.63 0.46 0.78 0.41 0.70

UCRBCumEff 0.43 0.53 0.48 0.39 0.52 0.44 0.76 0.44 0.74

724 Terrestrial
Period / Alternative4

Panel' Group2 Species Name Area3 H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

CAV CAV Williamson's sapsucker EEIS BLM/FS 0.26 0.54 0.67 0.52 0.71 0.52 0.60 0.60 0.58

EElSCumEff 0.26 0.54 0.57 0.51 0.74 0.58 0.73 0.58 0.53

UCRB BLM/FS 0.26 0.48 0.51 0.41 0.65 0.61 0.55 0.64 0.58

UCRBCumEff 0.26 0.48 0.55 0.44 0.63 0.63 0.55 0.67 0.53

PAS FOR Black-chinned

hummingbird EEIS BLM/FS 0.32 0.30 0.46 0.44 0.46 0.46 0.43 0.37 0.46

EElSCumEff 0.32 0.36 0.48 0.51 0.48 0.45 0.47 0.58 0.57

UCRB BLM/FS 0.32 0.30 0.46 0.44 0.46 0.46 0.43 0.37 0.46

UCRBCumEff 0.32 0.36 0.48 0.51 0.48 0.52 0.47 0.58 0.57

PAS FOR Broad-tailed

hummingbird UCRB BLM/FS 0.49 0.38 0.48 0.43 0.36 0.48 0.47 0.48 0.44

UCRBCumEff 0.49 0.44 0.57 0.50 0.41 0.44 0.49 0.55 0.56

PAS FOR Chestnut-backed

chickadee EEIS BLM/FS 0.38 0.44 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.66 0.49 0.61 0.49

EElSCumEff 0.38 0.44 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.66 0.49 0.61 0.49

UCRB BLM/FS 0.38 0.38 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.66 0.49 0.61 0.49

UCRBCumEff 0.38 0.38 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.66 0.49 0.61 0.49

PAS FOR Hammond's flycatcher EEIS BLM/FS 0.48 0.36 0.56 0.36 0.56 0.54 0.60 0.51 0.46

EElSCumEff 0.44 0.50 0.60 0.47 0.60 0.60 0.67 0.59 0.48

UCRB BLM/FS 0.48 0.33 0.58 0.33 0.58 0.54 0.63 0.51 0.46

UCRBCumEff 0.44 0.49 0.60 0.48 0.60 0.60 0.67 0.59 0.48

PAS FOR Lazuli bunting EEIS BLM/FS 0.49 0.43 0.55 0.44 0.42 0.49 0.55 0.48 0.49

EElSCumEff 0.49 0.57 0.55 0.57 0.55 0.55 0.54 0.53 0.56

UCRB BLM/FS 0.48 0.50 0.53 0.49 0.49 0.50 0.55 0.50 0.50

UCRBCumEff 0.48 0.53 0.51 0.53 0.49 0.51 0.51 0.48 0.57

PAS FOR Olive-sided flycatcher EEIS BLM/FS 0.40 0.48 0.50 0.52 0.50 0.46 0.50 0.46 0.44

EElSCumEff 0.40 0.50 0.51 0.50 0.51 0.50 0.57 0.50 0.50

UCRB BLM/FS 0.40 0.37 0.49 0.48 0.47 0.46 0.50 0.45 0.42

UCRBCumEff 0.40 0.47 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.52 0.47 0.48

PAS FOR Rufous hummingbird EEIS BLM/FS 0.49 0.49 0.64 0.58 0.65 0.44 0.66 0.50 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.49 0.53 0.64 0.66 0.64 0.59 0.65 0.53 0.53

UCRB BLM/FS 0.48 0.50 0.66 0.65 0.60 0.50 0.66 0.44 0.50

UCRBCumEff 0.48 0.53 0.64 0.66 0.64 0.59 0.65 0.53 0.53

PAS FOR Rufous-sided towhee EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.48 0.49 0.48 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

UCRB BLM/FS 0.50 0.46 0.47 0.46 0.49 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.50

UCRBCumEff 0.50 0.49 0.48 0.49 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

PAS FOR Western bluebird EEIS BLM/FS 0.26 0.17 0.81 0.32 0.48 0.43 0.48 0.44 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.26 0.17 0.75 0.42 0.49 0.73 0.42 0.67 0.70

UCRB BLM/FS 0.26 0.17 0.81 0.44 0.41 0.43 0.41 0.39 0.43

UCRBCumEff 0.26 0.17 0.75 0.53 0.42 0.73 0.51 0.72 0.68

PAS FOR Western tanager EEIS BLM/FS 0.30 0.30 0.46 0.33 0.30 0.30 0.46 0.30 0.30

EElSCumEff 0.33 0.33 0.71 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.73 0.64 0.64

UCRB BLM/FS 0.30 0.30 0.45 0.33 0.30 0.30 0.45 0.30 0.30

UCRBCumEff 0.33 0.33 0.71 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.73 0.64 0.64

Terrestrial 725
Period / Alternative"

Panel1 Group2 Species Name Area3 H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

PAS FOR White-winged crossbill EEIS BLM/FS 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.22 0.36 0.48 0.00 0.36

EElSCumEff 0.30 0.30 0.44 0.30 0.22 0.55 0.46 0.26 0.48

UCRB BLM/FS 0.00 0..00 0.48 0.00 0.22 0.36 0.48 0.00 0.36

UCRBCumEff 0.30 0.30 0.44 0.30 0.22 0.55 0.46 0.26 0.48

PAS FOR Wilson's warbler EEIS BLM/FS 0.43 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.46 0.49 0.46

EElSCumEff 0.43 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.46 0.49 0.46

UCRB BLM/FS 0.40 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.47 0.48 0.44

UCRBCumEff 0.40 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.47 0.48 0.44

PAS FOR Winter wren EEIS BLM/FS 0.48 0.57 0.44 0.44 0.48 0.67 0.53 0.60 0.64

EElSCumEff 0.48 0.44 0.57 0.56 0.56 0.47 0.60 0.65 0.35

UCRB BLM/FS 0.38 0.47 0.63 0.55 0.55 0.59 0.67 0.65 0.72

UCRBCumEff 0.38 0.44 0.55 0.56 0.43 0.64 0.60 0.66 0.48

PAS WD Ash-throated flycatcher EEIS BLM/FS 0.58 0.58 0.64 0.64 0.75 0.75 0.74 0.78 0.74

EElSCumEff 0.58 0.58 0.67 0.67 0.68 0.62 0.59 0.72 0.68

UCRB BLM/FS 0.62 0.57 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.74 0.73 0.78

UCRBCumEff 0.62 0.57 0.67 0.67 0.68 0.62 0.59 0.86 0.68

PAS WD Bushtit EEIS BLM/FS 0.00 0.58 0.67 0.67 0.63 0.50 0.60 0.50 0.49

EElSCumEff 0.00 0.58 0.67 0.67 0.63 0.50 0.60 0.50 0.49

UCRB BLM/FS 0.48 0.58 0.66 0.66 0.58 0.50 0.67 0.50 0.49

UCRBCumEff 0.48 0.58 0.66 0.66 0.58 0.50 0.67 0.50 0.49

PAS WD Chipping sparrow EEIS BLM/FS 0.22 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.22 0.25 0.22 0.22

EElSCumEff 0.22 0.35 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.48 0.49 0.48 0.48

UCRB BLM/FS 0.22 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.22 0.25 0.22 0.22

UCRBCumEff 0.22 0.35 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.48 0.49 0.48 0.48

PAS WD Green-tailed towhee EEIS BLM/FS 0.48 0.44 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.48 0.44 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.50

UCRB BLM/FS 0.48 0.44 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.50

UCRBCumEff 0.48 0.44 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.50

PAS RIP Red-eyed vireo EEIS BLM/FS 0.48 0.32 0.48 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.44 0.50 0.36

EElSCumEff 0.31 0.46 0.39 0.46 0.46 0.48 0.39 0.49 0.32

UCRB BLM/FS 0.48 0.50 0.32 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.46 0.49 0.36

UCRBCumEff 0.44 0.32 0.44 0.48 0.48 0.49 0.39 0.50 0.50

PAS RIP Red-winged blackbird EEIS BLM/FS 0.38 0.50 0.48 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.48 0.45 0.45

EElSCumEff 0.38 0.50 0.57 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.57 0.59 0.59

UCRB BLM/FS 0.38 0.50 0.48 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.49 0.47 0.45

UCRBCumEff 0.38 0.50 0.57 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.57 0.61 0.61

PAS RIP Veery EEIS BLM/FS 0.45 0.55 0.57 0.60 0.58 0.57 0.59 0.55 0.60

EElSCumEff 0.45 0.54 0.51 0.54 0.54 0.56 0.52 0.57 0.54

UCRB BLM/FS 0.49 0.57 0.58 0.59 0.59 0.57 0.61 0.55 0.58

UCRBCumEff 0.49 0.58 0.52 0.56 0.56 0.60 0.53 0.59 0.58

PAS RIP Willow flycatcher EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.53 0.49 0.54 0.50 0.54 0.49 0.53 0.53

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.50 0.45 0.49 0.48 0.50 0.46 0.50 0.49

UCRB BLM/FS 0.50 0.53 0.50 0.54 0.50 0.54 0.49 0.53 0.53

UCRBCumEff 0.50 0.50 0.45 0.49 0.47 0.50 0.46 0.49 0.50

72B Terrestrial
Period / Alternative4

Panel1 Group2 Species Name Area3 H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

PAS RIP Yellow warbler EEIS BLM/FS 0.49 0.48 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.46 0.50 0.45 0.47

EElSCumEff 0.49 0.50 0.47 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.44 0.50 0.50

UCRB BLM/FS 0.49 0.48 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.46 0.50 0.45 0.47

UCRBCumEff 0.49 0.50 0.47 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.44 0.50 0.50

PAS RIP Yellow-billed cuckoo EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.45 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.50 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.30 0.30 0.44 0.44 0.45 0.00 0.46 0.44

UCRB BLM/FS 0.48 0.50 0.45 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.50 0.50

UCRBCumEff 0.46 0.34 0.31 0.44 0.44 0.46 0.00 0.46 0.45

PAS RIP Yellow-breasted chat EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.36 0.49 0.49 0.48 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.49 0.48 0.46 0.49 0.48 0.50 0.25 0.36 0.50

UCRB BLM/FS 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.35 0.49 0.48 0.49

UCRBCumEff 0.49 0.48 0.46 0.49 0.48 0.50 0.25 0.36 0.50

PAS GS Black rosy finch EEIS BLM/FS 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.20 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.00

EElSCumEff 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.20 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.00

UCRB BLM/FS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

UCRBCumEff 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

PAS GS Bobolink EEIS BLM/FS 0.46 0.49 0.50 0.54 0.54 0.49 0.50 0.48 0.53

EElSCumEff 0.49 0.50 0.45 0.70 0.71 0.66 0.44 0.65 0.58

UCRB BLM/FS 0.48 0.56 0.54 0.66 0.66 0.60 0.54 0.59 0.66

UCRBCumEff 0.48 0.48 0.50 0.68 0.68 0.63 0.50 0.62 0.65

PAS GS Brewer's blackbird EEIS BLM/FS 0.27 0.30 0.60 0.33 0.39 0.31 0.61 0.31 0.35

EElSCumEff 0.27 0.67 0.68 0.69 0.69 0.70 0.68 0.71 0.69

UCRB BLM/FS 0.27 0.30 0.60 0.33 0.39 0.31 0.61 0.31 0.35

UCRBCumEff 0.27 0.67 0.67 0.69 0.69 0.70 0.68 0.71 0.69

PAS GS Brewer's sparrow EEIS BLM/FS 0.46 0.49 0.68 0.72 0.72 0.73 0.62 0.73 0.68

EElSCumEff 0.44 0.71 0.62 0.64 0.64 0.66 0.60 0.64 0.68

UCRB BLM/FS 0.48 0.72 0.70 0.74 0.74 0.76 0.64 0.78 0.69

UCRBCumEff 0.47 0.63 0.61 0.62 0.61 0.66 0.60 0.64 0.68

PAS GS Grasshopper sparrow EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.20 0.41 0.20 0.47 0.27

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.20 0.39 0.20 0.46 0.27

UCRB BLM/FS 0.56 0.38 0.44 0.44 0.51 0.52 0.47 0.57 0.51

UCRBCumEff 0.56 0.40 0.38 0.38 0.53 0.51 0.36 0.52 0.40

PAS GS Horned lark EEIS BLM/FS 0.54 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.44 0.50 0.44 0.46

EElSCumEff 0.54 0.50 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.66 0.60 0.67 0.66

UCRB BLM/FS 0.54 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.44 0.50 0.44 0.44

UCRBCumEff 0.54 0.50 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.66 0.60 0.67 0.66

PAS GS Lark sparrow EEIS BLM/FS 0.47 0.50 0.68 0.72 0.72 0.73 0.62 0.73 0.68

EElSCumEff 0.46 0.66 0.60 0.61 0.61 0.64 0.58 0.65 0.62

UCRB BLM/FS 0.49 0.71 0.70 0.74 0.74 0.76 0.64 0.78 0.69

UCRBCumEff 0.48 0.63 0.61 0.62 0.61 0.66 0.60 0.65 0.67

PAS GS Loggerhead shrike EEIS BLM/FS 0.48 0.66 0.77 0.82 0.82 0.83 0.75 0.79 0.80

EElSCumEff 0.48 0.94 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.66 0.78 0.74 0.68

UCRB BLM/FS 0.48 0.66 0.77 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.76 0.78 0.83

UCRBCumEff 0.48 0.94 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.65 0.76 0.74 0.72

Terrestrial 72?
Period / Alternative"

Panel1 Group2 Species Name Area3 H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

PAS GS Sage sparrow EEIS BLM/FS 0.42 0.48 0.72 0.73 0.73 0.75 0.67 0.75 0.66

EElSCum/Eff 0.39 0.67 0.68 0.69 0.69 0.71 0.67 0.62 0.70

UCRB BLM/FS 0.42 0.48 0.72 0.73 0.73 0.75 0.67 0.75 0.66

UCRBCumEff 0.39 0.64 0.68 0.68 0.67 0.71 0.67 0.62 0.70

PAS GS Sage thrasher EEIS BLM/FS 0.46 0.49 0.68 0.72 0.72 0.73 0.62 0.73 0.68

EElSCumEff 0.44 0.64 0.64 0.65 0.64 0.66 0.62 0.73 0.66

UCRB BLM/FS 0.48 0.80 0.70 0.74 0.74 0.76 0.64 0.78 0.69

UCRBCumEff 0.47 0.61 0.62 0.65 0.64 0.66 0.62 0.65 0.69

PAS GS Vesper sparrow EEIS BLM/FS 0.40 0.48 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.69 0.62 0.67

EElSCumEff 0.35 0.66 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.58 0.57 0.59 0.56

UCRB BLM/FS 0.40 0.48 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.69 0.62 0.67

UCRBCumEff 0.35 0.67 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.59 0.57 0.61 0.57

PAS GS Western meadowlark EEIS BLM/FS 0.27 0.30 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.46 0.50 0.44 0.49

EElSCumEff 0.27 0.30 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.50

UCRB BLM/FS 0.27 0.30 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.46 0.50 0.44 0.49

UCRBCumEff 0.27 0.30 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.50

BSM BAT Fringed myotis EEIS BLM/FS 0.51 0.58 0.71 0.63 0.67 0.72 0.64 0.70 0.72

EElSCumEff 0.51 0.59 0.40 0.49 0.49 0.56 0.46 0.69 0.67

UCRB BLM/FS 0.48 0.58 0.70 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.74 0.65 0.72

UCRBCumEff 0.51 0.59 0.42 0.50 0.49 0.56 0.48 0.67 0.66

BSM BAT Hoary bat EEIS BLM/FS 0.42 0.57 0.65 0.86 0.63 0.76 0.75 0.79 1.00

EElSCumEff 0.42 0.73 0.71 0.65 0.71 0.70 0.64 0.75 0.69

UCRB BLM/FS 0.42 0.55 0.62 0.78 0.77 0.75 0.69 0.85 0.97

UCRBCumEff 0.42 0.73 0.59 0.62 0.64 0.68 0.64 0.74 0.68

BSM BAT Long-eared myotis EEIS BLM/FS 0.49 0.61 0.60 0.76 0.64 0.73 0.57 0.77 0.80

EElSCumEff 0.49 0.66 0.64 0.72 0.66 0.71 0.61 0.76 0.70

UCRB BLM/FS 0.49 0.61 0.58 0.76 0.62 0.67 0.67 0.77 0.80

UCRBCumEff 0.49 0.66 0.64 0.66 0.66 0.71 0.67 0.77 0.71

BSM BAT Long-legged myotis EEIS BLM/FS 0.48 0.65 0.68 0.73 0.70 0.65 0.64 0.62 0.69

EElSCumEff 0.48 0.52 0.46 0.66 0.39 0.56 0.46 0.72 0.68

UCRB BLM/FS 0.48 0.65 0.72 0.69 0.67 0.69 0.59 0.65 0.79

UCRBCumEff 0.48 0.52 0.46 0.59 0.59 0.56 0.46 0.70 0.52

BSM BAT Pale western

big-eared bat EEIS BLM/FS 0.52 0.53 0.54 0.47 0.58 0.47 0.60 0.55 0.55

EElSCumEff 0.52 0.56 0.43 0.49 0.50 0.54 0.40 0.57 0.56

UCRB BLM/FS 0.52 0.53 0.54 0.47 0.59 0.46 0.60 0.54 0.61

UCRBCumEff 0.52 0.55 0.44 0.49 0.50 0.54 0.40 0.56 0.56

BSM BAT Silver-haired bat EEIS BLM/FS 0.54 0.54 0.72 0.75 0.62 0.69 0.70 0.62 0.69

EElSCumEff 0.49 0.69 0.62 0.73 0.73 0.86 0.64 0.83 0.73

UCRB BLM/FS 0.54 0.54 0.74 0.67 0.66 0.71 0.90 0.66 0.66

UCRBCumEff 0.49 0.69 0.62 0.73 0.73 0.85 0.64 0.84 0.73

728 Terrestrial
Period / Alternative"

Panel1 Group2 Species Name Area3 H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

BSM BAT Spotted bat EEIS BLM/FS 0.32 0.48 0.33 0.30 0.22 0.29 0.50 0.23 0.48

EElSCumEff 0.32 0.49 0.19 0.21 0.48 0.22 0.46 0.21 0.50

UCRB BLM/FS 0.32 0.48 0.32 0.29 0.22 0.27 0.50 0.21 0.48

UCRBCumEff 0.32 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.48 0.50 0.04 0.48 0.50

BSM BAT Western small-footed

myotis EEIS BLM/FS 0.40 0.46 0.46 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.46 0.78 0.60

UCRB BLM/FS 0.40 0.46 0.46 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.46 0.78 0.60

BSM SMM Northern flying squirrel EEIS BLM/FS 0.30 0.83 0.70 0.86 0.83 0.80 0.72 0.80 0.68

EElSCumEff 0.32 0.80 0.39 0.57 0.49 0.59 0.67 0.61 0.71

UCRB BLM/FS 0.30 0.83 0.82 0.80 0.85 0.73 0.86 0.71 0.85

UCRBCumEff 0.32 0.77 0.59 0.50 0.64 0.73 0.50 0.72 0.71

BSM SMM Pygmy rabbit EEIS BLM/FS 0.64 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

UCRB BLM/FS 0.64 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

BSM SMM White-tailed jackrabbit EEIS BLM/FS 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40

EElSCumEff 0.40 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78

UCRB BLM/FS 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40

UCRBCumEff 0.40 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78

C&U CAR American marten EEIS BLM/FS 0.50 0.84 0.75 0.84 0.84 0.57 0.70 0.57 0.64

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.84 0.64 0.72 0.73 0.77 0.64 0.78 0.88

UCRB BLM/FS 0.76 1.01 0.79 0.88 0.88 0.64 1.00 0.64 0.64

UCRBCumEff 0.76 0.87 0.75 0.83 0.83 0.81 0.79 0.87 0.79

C&U CAR Fisher EEIS BLM/FS 1.01 0.44 0.39 0.58 0.59 0.85 0.35 0.85 0.75

EElSCumEff 1.01 0.40 0.27 0.40 0.24 0.40 0.24 0.40 0.70

UCRB BLM/FS 0.75 0.75 0.70 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.75 0.67 0.70

UCRBCumEff 0.75 0.44 0.51 0.48 0.42 0.49 0.42 0.59 0.72

C&U CAR Gray wolf EEIS BLM/FS 0.64 0.68 0.70 0.67 0.70 0.67 0.70 0.69 0.71

EElSCumEff 0.70 0.78 0.72 0.78 0.72 0.82 0.72 0.89 0.93

UCRB BLM/FS 0.52 0.75 0.79 0.75 0.79 0.75 0.78 0.76 0.78

UCRBCumEff 0.52 0.99 0.63 0.68 0.66 0.68 0.63 0.72 0.77

C&U CAR Grizzly bear EEIS BLM/FS 0.73 0.69 0.58 0.59 0.59 0.57 0.58 0.57 0.78

EElSCumEff 0.63 0.38 0.24 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.29 0.65

UCRB BLM/FS 0.61 1.18 1.03 1.07 1.03 1.08 1.03 1.19 1.22

UCRBCumEff 0.67 0.47 0.40 0.44 0.44 0.47 0.40 0.75 0.92

C&U CAR Lynx EEIS BLM/FS 0.45 0.69 0.50 0.50 0.78 0.50 0.51 0.78 0.79

EElSCumEff 0.45 0.50 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.30 0.50 0.50

UCRB BLM/FS 0.45 0.69 0.50 0.50 0.78 0.50 0.51 0.85 0.78

UCRBCumEff 0.45 0.49 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.30 0.50 0.50

C&U CAR Wolverine EEIS BLM/FS 0.45 0.69 0.58 0.59 0.59 0.57 0.58 0.57 0.64

EElSCumEff 0.84 0.49 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.24 0.79

UCRB BLM/FS 0.45 0.83 0.89 0.90 0.89 0.92 0.90 0.92 0.86

UCRBCumEff 0.84 0.20 0.14 0.30 0.14 0.27 0.14 0.30 0.85

Terrestrial 729
738 Terrestrial

Period / Alternative4

Panel1 Group2 Species Name Area3 H C A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

C&U UNG California bighorn

sheep EEISBLM/FS 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.50 0.49 0.30

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.46 0.46 0.49 0.46 0.46 0.49 0.46 0.30

UCRBBLM/FS 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.50 0.49 0.30

UCRBCumEff 0.50 0.46 0.46 0.49 0.46 0.46 0.49 0.46 0.30

C&U UNG Pronghorn EEISBLM/FS 0.45 0.50 0.63 0.63 0.49 0.46 0.63 0.46 0.63

EElSCumEff 0.45 0.70 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64

UCRBBLM/FS 0.45 0.67 0.64 0.64 0.48 0.46 0.64 0.46 0.64

UCRBCumEff 0.45 0.49 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64

C&U UNG Woodland caribou EEISBLM/FS 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50

EElSCumEff 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50

UCRBBLM/FS 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50

UCRBCumEff 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50

'Panel - BSM - bat and small mammal panel; CAV - cavity nesting woodpeckers, swifts, and nuthatches; C&U - mammalian carnivore and ungulate panel; HER - amphibian and reptile panel; PAS - passerine and other birds; RGB - raptor and game bird panel; WAT - waterbird and shorebird

panel.

2Group - Group within panel: AMP - amphibian; REP - reptile; FOR - forest passerine; WD - woodland passerine; GS - grassland & shrub passerine; RIP - riparian passerine; RAP - raptor; GMB - gamebird; BAT - bat; SMM - small mammal; CAR - carnivore; UNG - ungulate.

'Area - EEIS BLM/FS - Eastern Oregon and Washington planning area, BLM and Forest Service lands only; EEIS CumEff - all lands in Eastern

Oregon and Washington planning area; UCRB BLM/FS - Upper Columbia Basin planning area, BLM and Forest Service lands only; UCRB

CumEff - all lands in Upper Columbia Basin planning area.

'Period / Alternative - H - historical pre-European settlement period; C - current; Al - alternative 1; A2 - alternative 2; etc.