alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 15.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated March 15, 2016, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements of Innocoll AG included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year endedDecember 31, 2015. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (file no. 333-207184),as amended, of Innocoll AG of our report dated March 15, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of InnocollAG included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

/s/ Grant Thornton

Dublin, Ireland

March 17, 2016
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Todd Shipyards Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), that to the best of our knowledge
and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Dated:  October 28, 2003

/s/Scott H. Wiscomb
Scott H. Wiscomb,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



1
No. 53717.

protest 147030-K (New York).

#### J. Jackson & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

*207Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in Austin, *Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022201EN.01009301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 18.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/93 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10662 – ATLANTIA / YUNEX)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 201/10)

1.

On 10 May 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2022201EN.01009301-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Atlantia S.p.A (‘Atlantia’, Italy), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Yunex GmbH (‘Yunex’, Germany), ultimately controlled by Siemens AG (Germany). |

Atlantia will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Yunex.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Atlantia provides tolling and mobility services and manages motorway and airport infrastructure under concession. It is active in several EEA countries including Italy, Spain, France and, to a limited extent, Poland. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Yunex is a global provider of intelligent urban and interurban road traffic solutions. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2022201EN.01009301-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10662 – ATLANTIA / YUNEX

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2022201EN.01009301-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2022201EN.01009301-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
No. 47543.

#### Protest 965840-G of American Import Co. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the hearing an attempt was made by the only witness for the plaintiff to establish that the fur monkeys, a sample of which was received in evidence as illustrative exhibit 1, are the same as those the subject of Abstract 34101, which decision in turn is based upon agreed facts in Abstract 25607. However, this fact was not established. The plaintiff also failed to introduce any evidence that the merchandise is not chiefly used for the amusement of children. On the record presented the protest was overruled.
#### A. W. Fenton Co., (Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.) et al. *v.*United States

No. 7545.

Entry Nos. 727411; 718819; 758387.

Invoices dated London, England, January 20, 1944, etc.

Certified January 1944, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 10, 1944, etc.

(Decided February 19, 1948)

*E. H. Loyd*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivee, Presiding Judge:

The,,appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances-by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 62 (Monday, April 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6087]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

(Docket 45-2006)


Foreign-Trade Zone 86 - Tacoma, Washington, Withdrawal of Request 
for Manufacturing Authority

    Notice is hereby given of the withdrawal of the application 
requesting manufacturing authority on behalf of Panasonic Consumer 
Electronics Co., and its warehouse/FTZ operator Norvanco International 
Inc. The application was filed on November 8, 2006 (71 FR 69203, 11/30/
06).
    The withdrawal was requested because of changed circumstances, and 
the case has been closed without prejudice.

    Dated: March 27, 2007.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-6087 Filed 3-30-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Robert Gregory Ketter,

Plaintiff

 v.

City of Newark, Ohio, et al.,

Defendants

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action 2:11-cv-00734

Judge Watson

Magistrate Judge Abel

ORDER

Plaintiff’s June 27, 2013 motion to vacate the scheduling order (doc. 71) is

GRANTED. The Court will issue a new scheduling order when it rules on defendants’

motion to reconsider. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to remove document 70 from

the pending motions list. 

s/Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case: 2:11-cv-00734-MHW-MRA Doc #: 75 Filed: 07/02/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 28, 2009

p0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

138885

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138885 COA: 281875 Washtenaw CC: 06-001873-FC JO ANN CALDWELL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 21, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
# C_2008314EN.01S00301.xml

| 9.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
```

[104th Congress Public Law 211]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ211.104]

[[Page 110 STAT. 3013]]

  

Public Law 104-211
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To amend Public Law 103-93 to provide additional lands within the State 
       of Utah for the Goshute Indian Reservation, and for other 
            purposes. <<NOTE: Oct. 1, 1996 -  [H.R. 2464]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITION OF CERTAIN UTAH STATE LANDS TO GOSHUTE INDIAN 
            RESERVATION.

    The Utah Schools and Lands Improvement Act of 1993 (107 Stat. 995) 
is amended--
            (1) by redesignating section 11 as section 12; and
            (2) by inserting after section 10 the following new section:

``SEC. 11. ADDITIONAL GOSHUTE INDIAN RESERVATION LANDS.

    ``(a) Further Additions to Goshute Reservation.--In addition to the 
lands described in section 3, for the purpose of securing in trust for 
the Goshute Indian Tribe certain additional public lands and lands 
belonging to the State of Utah, which comprise approximately 8,000 acres 
of surface and subsurface estate, as generally depicted on the map 
entitled `Additional Utah-Goshute Exchange', dated July 1, 1994, such 
public lands and State lands are hereby declared to be part of the 
Goshute Indian Reservation in the State of Utah effective upon the 
completion of conveyance of the State lands from the State of Utah and 
acceptance of title by the United States.
    ``(b) Authorization.--The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to 
acquire through exchange those lands and interests in land described in 
subsection (a) which are owned by the State of Utah, subject to valid 
existing rights.
    ``(c) Application of Prior Provisions.--(1) Except as provided in 
paragraph (2), the remaining provisions of this Act which are applicable 
to the lands to be transferred to the Goshute Indian Tribe pursuant to 
section 3 shall also apply to the lands subject to this section.
    ``(2) The Goshute Indian Tribe will be responsible for payment of 
the costs of appraisal of the lands to be acquired pursuant to this 
section, which costs shall be paid prior to the transfer of such 
lands.''.

    Approved October 1, 1996.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2464:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104-562 (Comm. on Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 104-348 (Comm. on Indian Affairs).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):
            May 14, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 19, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit
      10.1

     

    INTERACTIVE
      SYSTEMS WORLDWIDE INC.

    2
      Andrews
      Drive, 2nd
      Floor

    West
      Paterson, NJ 07424

    


     

    July
      31,
      2008

     

     

    _____________________

     

    _____________________

     

    _____________________

     

    Dear
      Mr.
      _________________:

     

    Reference
      is made to the 14% Non-Negotiable Promissory Note (“Note”) due July
      31,
      2008 and the Note Purchase Agreement signed contemporaneous with issuance of
      the
      Note (“NPA”). The parties hereby agree that the amount evidenced by the Note as
      of July 31, 2008, including principal and interest accrued through July 31,
      2008, in the aggregate amount of $____________, shall continue to bear interest
      at the rate of 14% per annum and that the maturity date of the Note is extended
      to October 31, 2008. The duration of the Company’s covenants contained in
      Section 3.2 (relating to declaring or paying cash dividends or making cash
      distributions on common or preferred stock or purchasing common or preferred
      stock for cash) and Section 3.3 (relating to increasing the salary of any
      officer of the Company) in the NPA are extended to the earlier of payment of
      all
      principal and accrued interest on the Note or November 1, 2008. Except as herein
      provided, the Note and NPA shall remain in full force and effect in accordance
      with their respective terms.

     

    The
      extension of the Note and other provisions of this letter agreement are subject
      to and conditioned upon the holders of all similar Notes issued by the Company,
      in the aggregate initial principal amount of $369,000 agreeing to provisions,
      in
      all material respects, similar to the provisions contained in this letter
      agreement. If you agree to the terms of this letter, please sign a copy of
      this
      letter and return it to me.

     

    Interactive
      Systems Worldwide Inc.

     

    


     

    
      	 	By:	 
	 	 	Name: Bernard
              Albanese
	 	 	Title: Chief
              Executive Officer


    

          

     

    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

     

    Agreed
      to
      and Accepted:

     

    
      	 	 


    

    Name: 

    Title:
Exhibit No. 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Texas Pacific Land Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), David M. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer of the Trust,
certifies, to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

|                         | TEXAS PACIFIC LAND TRUST(Registrant)                                                                     
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  November 14, 2003 | By:/s/ David M. Peterson
     David M. Peterson, Assistant General
     Agent and Chief Financial Officer
(A. R. D. 15)

#### United States *v.*Nicholas Gal (Globe Shipping Co., Inc.)

Entry Nos. 720153/1; 708931.

Third Division, Appellate Term

(Order dated January 27, 1953)

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Spector,*special attorney), for the appellant, against the motion.

*Eugene B. Pickrell (Michael Stramiello, Jr.,*of counsel) for the appellee, for the motion.

Before Cline, Ekwall, and Johnson, Judges; Cline, J., not participating

ORDER

Ekwall, Judge:

Upon reading and filing appellee’s motion for rehearing and reconsideration of the order of this court, dated November 24, 1952, wherein the court denied the motion to dismiss the application for review filed by the appellant herein insofar as it seeks a review of the order of a single judge of the United States Customs Court, dated May 26, 1952 (Reap. Dec. 8119), relating to appeals for reappraisement Nos. 139494-A and 139535-A, and upon reading and filing the memorandum of the appellee in support of the motion herein, and the memorandum of the Government in opposition to this motion,

*590Now, upon further consideration thereof and of the memorandum filed on behalf of appellee, and in view of the holding in the case of *Cox*& *Fahner et al.*v. *United States,*31 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 141, C. A. D. 264, it is the opinion of the'court that the order of the single judge severing reappraisements 139494-A and 139535-A from re-appraisement 140802-A and ordering said' two reappraisement appeals restored to the calendar for futher proof, is an interlocutory-order and not appealable, and it is hereby

ORDERED, Adjudged, and Decreed that the application for review filed by the United States, appellant, be and the same is hereby dismissed insofar as it seeks a review of the order of a single judge of the United States Customs Court, dated May 26, 1952 (Reap. Dec. 8119), with respect to appeals for reappraisement Nos. 139494-A and 139535-A. The order of this court, dated November 24, 1952, is hereby revoked.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 20 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 20

       Designating January 2005 as ``National Mentoring Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 28, 2005

  Mr. Kennedy (for himself, Mr. McCain, Mr. DeWine, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. 
 Bayh, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Levin, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Dayton, Ms. Landrieu, 
 Mr. Johnson, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, Ms. Stabenow, and Mrs. Clinton) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Designating January 2005 as ``National Mentoring Month''.

Whereas mentors serve as role models, advocates, friends, and advisors to youth 
        in need;
Whereas mentoring is a proven, effective strategy to enable caring, responsible 
        adults to provide guidance and build confidence, stability, and 
        direction for individual children;
Whereas research demonstrates that mentoring has a positive impact on students 
        by increasing attendance at school, improving rates of high-school 
        graduation and college attendance, and reducing involvement with drugs, 
        alcohol, and violent behavior;
Whereas over 17,000,000 children in the United States today need or want a 
        mentor, but only 2,000,000 are in mentoring relationships, leaving a 
        ``mentoring gap'' of 15,000,000 young people;
Whereas the establishment of a National Mentoring Month will emphasize the 
        importance of mentoring and pay tribute to the many Americans already 
        involved in mentoring;
Whereas a month-long celebration of mentoring will encourage more organizations, 
        such as schools, businesses, faith communities, and individuals to get 
        involved in mentoring; and
Whereas celebrations of mentoring would encourage more individuals to volunteer 
        as mentors and help close the mentoring gap: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) proclaims the month of January 2005 as ``National 
        Mentoring Month'';
            (2) recognizes that the President issued a proclamation 
        calling upon the people of the United States and interested 
        groups to observe the month with appropriate ceremonies and 
        activities to promote awareness of mentoring and to encourage 
        many more Americans to participate in mentoring; and
            (3) recognizes with great appreciation the contributions of 
        millions of caring adults who now serve as mentors and 
        encourages more adults to give of their time and become mentors 
        as an essential part of school reform.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 31.2**I, Joseph F. Spanier, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Breeze-Eastern Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: February 13, 2007 /s/  Joseph F. Spanier   Joseph F. Spanier   Chief Financial Officer  
30