alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.12
​
English Summary
​
Service Agreement
 
This Service Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Service Agreement”) is entered into based on the tender award dated April 29, 2021 between:
​
Free State of Bavaria, Germany, represented by the Bavarian State Office for Health and Food Safety with address at Eggenreuther Weg 43, 91058 Erlangen, Germany (“Contracting Authority”)
​
and
​
Centogene GmbH (the “Contractor”), a company incorporated in accordance with the laws of the Federal Republic of Germany with a registered address at Am Strande 7, 18055 Rostock, Germany.
​
		1.	Subject Matter of the Contract

​
The Contractor undertakes to establish two mobile test centers to conduct PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 in each of the Bavarian government districts of Upper Palatinate and Upper Franconia.
​
		2.	Scope of Services

​
Amongst other obligations, the Contractor shall undertake the establishment and operation of mobile test centers and provide sufficient physicians and expert personnel in the test centers. The Contractor shall operate the mobile test centers on a 7-day per week basis and shall maintain test capacities to accommodate daily requirements which are estimated to be up to 500 per day per site.
​
The Contractor is permitted to engage subcontractors subject to prior approval by the Contracting Authority. The Contractor employs 21 Dx GmbH and Dr. Bauer Laboratoriums GmbH as subcontractors.
​
		3.	Obligations of the Contractor

​
The Contractor’s obligations include, among other things,
​
		i.	performance of tests by a physician or qualified personnel, especially in connection with breakout clusters or in a close spatial context (e.g. elderly care facilities)	

		ii.	establishment of mobile test centers at agreed places and times

		iii.	provision of mobile test facilities (e.g. tents, vehicles, containers)

		iv.	change of locations overnight

		v.	setup of test center locations within 24 hours upon request

		vi.	achievement of fully operational status within four hours after arrival at a test location

		vii.	provision of personal protective equipment for personnel and testing materials

		viii.	provision of notifications on test results to tested persons and health authorities

		ix.	provision of data on tested persons and findings to the health authorities and tested persons, carried out exclusively in a suitable manner using a data protection compliant web application	

		x.	general compliance with applicable law and regulations

​
		4.	Remuneration

​
In consideration of the Contractor providing the services under the Service Agreement, the Contracting Authority shall pay the Contractor a weekly basic flat rate (including expenses) per mobile test center a daily fee for operating the mobile test center during the term of the Service Agreement minus what the Contractor is entitled to under the Regulation on the entitlement to be tested with regard to a direct determination of the pathogen of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (Coronavirus-Test-Verordnung - TestV).
​
		5.	Term and Termination

​
The term of the Service Agreement commenced on April 29, 2021 and has expired on June 30, 2021.
Exhibit 33.11



|     |  |                                                                  
|---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | 130 S Jefferson Street
Suite 300 Chicago, IL 60631
(312) 233-6440
|    
|    
|    

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND

EXCHANGE COMMISSIONS REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

For
the calendar year ending December 31, 2017, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service

Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank(the
Servicer).

National Tax Search, LLC (NTS) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2017 and for
the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the CFR). NTS has used
the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (1)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and
1122(d)(4)(xii) (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122
(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTSs
TaxQ system (the Platform Transactions).

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the
Reporting Period and has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2017 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2017 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

National Tax Search, LLC, as
Vendor to Servicer



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Lori D. Eshoo           
|Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO
|January 26, 2018
Coachella Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor Service Program – Draft EIS/EIR

3 Environmental Analysis, Consequences, and Mitigation

May 2021 | 3-1

3 Environmental Analysis, Consequences, 

and Mitigation

The purpose of this chapter is to describe existing environmental baseline conditions in the areas 

that would be affected by the Build Alternative Options and the No Build Alternative, evaluate 

potential environmental effects or impacts associated with the No Build Alternative and with 

constructing and operating the Build Alternative Options, and present potential Tier 1/Program 

EIS/EIR mitigation strategies to avoid or reduce those effects or impacts under a Tier 2/Project-level 

analysis. 
Coachella Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor Service Program – Draft EIS/EIR

3 Environmental Analysis, Consequences, and Mitigation

May 2021 | 3-2

This page is intentionally blank.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9313 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to report to Congress 

on the compliance under the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 of 

all office buildings under the jurisdiction, custody, or control of the 

General Services Administration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 6, 2024 

Mr. MOLINARO (for himself and Ms. TITUS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to 

report to Congress on the compliance under the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 of all office buildings under 

the jurisdiction, custody, or control of the General Services Administration, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Think Differently 

5 About Building Accessibility Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9313 IH

1 SEC. 2. GAO REPORT. 

2 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

3 of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States 

4 shall report to the Committee on Transportation and In5 frastructure of the House of Representatives and the Com6 mittee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate 

7 on the compliance under the Architectural Barriers Act 

8 of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4151 et seq.) of all office buildings 

9 under the jurisdiction, custody, or control of the General 

10 Services Administration. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 138 

Designating July 23, 2005, as ‘‘National Day of the American Cowboy’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2005 

Mr. THOMAS (for himself, Mr. BURNS, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. 

CRAPO, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. ENZI, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. ALLEN, 

Mr. STEVENS, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. BINGAMAN, and Mr. CRAIG) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 23, 2005, as ‘‘National Day of the 

American Cowboy’’. 

Whereas pioneering men and women, recognized as cowboys, 

helped establish the American West; 

Whereas that cowboy spirit continues to infuse this country 

with its solid character, sound family values, and good 

common sense; 

Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, 

compassion, respect, a strong work ethic, and patriotism; 

Whereas the cowboy loves, lives off of, and depends on the 

land and its creatures, and is an excellent steward, protecting and enhancing the environment; 
2 

•SRES 138 ATS

Whereas the cowboy continues to play a significant role in 

America’s culture and economy; 

Whereas approximately 800,000 ranchers are conducting 

business in all 50 of these United States and are contributing to the economic well being of nearly every county 

in the Nation; 

Whereas rodeo is the sixth most-watched sport in America; 

Whereas membership in rodeo and other organizations surrounding the livelihood of a cowboy transcends race and 

gender and spans every generation; 

Whereas the cowboy is an American icon; 

Whereas to recognize the American cowboy is to acknowledge 

America’s ongoing commitment to an esteemed and enduring code of conduct; and 

Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys to their 

communities should be recognized and encouraged: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates July 23, 2005, as ‘‘National Day 

3 of the American Cowboy’’; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

6 activities. 

Æ
No. 56108.

protest 171324-K (New York).

#### Frederick B. Cooper Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the issue and merchandise herein are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Axel Stokby et al.*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358), except that in the liquidation of the entries covered by the instant protest, an allowance was made for gelatinous substance equal to 10 percent of the content of the tins, whereas the percentage of gelatinous substance should have been 19.8 percent as to entry 762940 and 28.3 percent as to entry 762941. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited the merchandise was held dutiable at *3}i*cents per pound under paragraph 703, Tariff Act of 1930, upon the basis of the net weight of the contents of the cans, less 19.8 percent and 28.3 percent allowance on entries 762940 and 762941, respectively, for the weight of the gelatinous material.
# C_2007199EN.01001201.xml

| 25.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 July 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-317/06) (1)

1

(Failure of Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2002/14/EC - Informing and consulting employees in the European Community - Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)

(2007/C 199/19)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Enegren and R. Vidal Puig, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: M. A. Sampoll Pucurull, agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to take, within the period prescribed the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community — Joint declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on employee representation (OJ 2002 L 80, p. 29)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by not having adopted, within the period prescribed, the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by not having adopted, within the period prescribed, the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 212, 2.9.2006.

1

---
Gase No. 14,686.

#### UNITED STATES v. BERREYESA.

[1 Hoff. Land Cas. 99.] 1

District Court, N. D. California.

Dec. Term, 1855.

Mexican Land Grant — Validity of Grant.

The confirmation of this claim not disputed.

Claim [by Jose Santos Berreyesa] for four square leagues of land in Napa county [the rancho Mallacomes], confirmed by the board, and appealed by the United States.

S. W. Inge, U. S. Atty.

Thornton & Williams, for appellee.

HOFFMAN, District Judge.

The genuineness of the grant is fully proved, and the circumstances mentioned appear in the expe-diente which is found in the archives. The boundaries of the land are proved to be well defined, being on three sides high mountains, on the fourth the rancho of Dr. Bale, from which the claimant’s land is separated by an arroyo having a mill upon it erected by Dr. Bale. The claim was confirmed by the board. No objection is urged on the part of the United States, and we think their decision should be affirmed.

*1135UNITED STATES v. BERREYESA See Case No. 15,140.
1 

### Werner, Christopher

From: Werner, Christopher

Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 6:32 PM

To: 'Szabo, Aaron'

Cc: Lorang, Phil; Jones, Rhea; Beaver, Melinda; Marks, Matthew; Anderson, Lea; VanLare, Paula; Greenglass, Nora; Smith, Kristi; Palma, Eliz abeth; Wood, Anna; Harnett, Bill Subject: EPA responses to Interagency Comments
Attachments: 03_09_2016 EPA RESPONSES to Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866 _E013563_Regional Haze_2060-AS55_NPRM.docx; RH NPRM Rx fire multi-year plan aspect 03_09_2016.docx; RH NPRM SMP aspect 03_09_20 16.docx

Categories: Regional Haze

Aaron,

As agreed upon during today’s interagency call on E PA’s proposed revisions to the regional haze rule, attached please find 3 documents, as follows: 1) Response-to-comments document containing EPA’s revi sed responses to additional interagency comments received earlier this week, entitled “03_09_2016 EP A RESPONSES to Summary of Interagency Comments unde r EO12866_E013563_Regional Haze_2060-AS55_NPRM.docx”; 2) Document referenced within response-to-comments doc ument, entitled “RH NPRM Rx fire multi-year plan aspect 03_09_2016.docx”; 3) Document referenced within response-to-comments doc ument, entitled “RH NPRM SMP aspect 03_09_2016.docx”.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you,

Chris Werner US EPA – Office of Air Quality Planning and Standar ds Air Quality Policy Division (919) 541-5133 werner.christopher@epa.gov
IIA 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 13 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative 

to marriage. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 14, 2005 

Mr. BROWNBACK (for himself and Mr. INHOFE) introduced the following joint 

resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relative to marriage. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 
2 

•SJ 13 IS

1 ‘‘ARTICLE — 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Marriage in the United States shall con3 sist only of the union of a man and a woman. 

4 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress shall have the power to en5 force this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 69 (Wednesday, April 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6796]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER02-2458-004, ER02-2458-005 and ER02-2458-006]


Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing

April 5, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 4, 2007, Wolverine Power Supply 
Cooperative, Inc. filed a response to the Commission's March 30, 2007 
letter order.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89cfccdbcac6e7e5e0e7ecdafcf9f9e6fbfdc9efecfbeaa7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d3b382f3e3213111413182e080d0d120f093d1b180f1e531a120b">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 13, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-6796 Filed 4-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 50190 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
CAROL WATKINS, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:13

- CR

- 176

- 6

Before KING, JOLLY, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Carol Watkins, Jr., appeals the sentence imposed following his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C) and 846

. He was sentenced to 165 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. He
contends that the district court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 12, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-50190 Document: 00512834088 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/12/2014No. 14

- 50190

32(i)(3)(B) and denied him due process by failing to rule on his objection to the drug quantity. Because Watkins did not raise these claims of error in the district court, review is for p lain error. See Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009); United States v. Jackson , 453 F.3d 302, 305 (5th Cir. 2006). The district court implicitly determined that a ruling on the drug quantity was unnecessary because it would not affect sente ncing. See F ED

. R. C RIM

. P . 32(i)(3)(B). C ontrary to Watkins’s argument, his unadjusted offense level under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1(b) , the career offender Guideline, was 32 because the offense statutory maximum was “ 20 years or more , but less than 25 years

. ” § 4B1.1(b)(3) ; see § 841(b)(1)(C)

. Thus, W atkins had th e same total offense level and guidelines range under § 4B1.1 (b) as calculated in the presentence report under § 2D1.1, the drug trafficking Guideline. Accordingly, the district court complied with
R ule 32(i)(3)(B) and did not deprive Watkins of an opportunity to be heard on a material issue or fail to make relevant findings of fact

. Further, Watkins cannot show that his substantial rights were affected. See Puckett , 556 U.S. at
135 . Even if the district court had ruled in his favor on the drug quantity, thus lowering his base offense level under § 2D1.1, Watkins still would have faced the same guidelines range since the higher offense level under § 4B1.1 would have applied. See § 4B1.1(b). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 14-50190 Document: 00512834088 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/12/2014