alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.2  LOGO OFFICERS CERTIFICATE C-III Asset Management LLC The
undersigned, Barry Davis, President of C-III Asset Management LLC (f/k/a Centerline Servicing LLC), the Special Servicer under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2015, relating to the Citigroup
Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC35, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC35(the Pooling and Servicing Agreement), hereby certifies as follows:  1.
a review of the activities of the Special Servicer and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement during the preceding calendar year 2018 (the Reporting Period) has been made under the undersigneds supervision;  2.
to the best of the undersigneds knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer maintained an
effective internal control system relating to its servicing of the Mortgage Loans serviced by it and has fulfilled in all material respects its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout such Reporting Period. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,as of the 1st day of March, 2019, I have hereunto signed my name.  /s/ Barry DavisBarry Davis, PresidentC-III Asset Management LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company
 CGCMT 2015-GC35
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-30609

Conference Calendar

 

WILLIAM EARL DEGRATE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF MONROE; JOE 

STEWART, Chief of Police,

Monroe City Police Dep’t;

BOB POWELL, Mayor of the

City of Monroe,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-244

- - - - - - - - - -

April 10, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

William Earl Degrate has filed an application for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal, following the district

court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure

to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. By moving

for IFP, Degrate is challenging the district court’s

certification that IFP should not be granted on appeal because 
No. 97-30609

-2-

his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117

F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). 

Degrate argues that the district court erred in not

permitting him to pursue his claims that he was falsely arrested

and imprisoned by the arresting officers. Because Degrate did

not appeal to the district court the magistrate judge’s order

denying Degrate’s motion to amend his complaint to add the claim

against the officers, Degrate has not preserved the issue for

appellate review. Colburn v. Bunge Towing, Inc., 883 F.2d 372,

379 (5th Cir. 1989). 

Degrate has not shown that he is presenting a nonfrivolous

issue on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Because Degrate has

not demonstrated a nonfrivolous issue for appeal, the appeal is

DISMISSED. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.24 (5th Cir.

1997); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL AND EXECUTIVE FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Constellation Growth Corporation, (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: October 23, 2012



/s/ Joseph Rozelle

Joseph Rozelle

President

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
No. 50601.

#### Protest 61119-K of E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. " (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoice should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as *301certified by the Federal Reserve Bank and set forth by the collector on the entry. The protest was sustained to this extent.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 12 (Friday, January 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-753]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Service Regulations Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service (hereinafter Service) will 
conduct an open meeting on February 8, 2007, to identify and discuss 
preliminary issues concerning the 2007-08 migratory bird hunting 
regulations.

DATES: The meeting will be held February 8, 2007.

ADDRESSES: The Service Regulations Committee will meet at the Embassy 
Suites Hotel, Denver--International Airport, 7001 Yampa Street, Denver, 
Colorado, (303) 574-3000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Blohm, Acting Chief, Division 
of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 
Department of the Interior, ms MBSP-4107-ARLSQ, 1849 C Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20240, (703) 358-1714.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the authority of the Migratory Bird 
Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703-712), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 
regulates the hunting of migratory game birds. We update the migratory 
game bird hunting regulations, located at 50 CFR part 20, annually. 
Through these regulations, we establish the frameworks, or outside 
limits, for season lengths, bag limits, and areas for migratory game 
bird hunting. To help us in this process, we have administratively 
divided the nation into four Flyways (Atlantic, Mississippi, Central, 
and Pacific), each of which has a Flyway Council. Representatives from 
the Service, the Service's Migratory Bird Regulations Committee, and 
Flyway Council Consultants will meet on February 8, 2007, at 8:30 a.m. 
to identify preliminary issues concerning the 2007-08 migratory bird 
hunting regulations for discussion and review by the Flyway Councils at 
their March meetings.
    In accordance with Departmental policy regarding meetings of the 
Service Regulations Committee attended by any person outside the 
Department, these meetings are open to public observation.

    Dated: December 11, 2006.
Paul R. Schmidt,
Assistant Director, Migratory Birds, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
 [FR Doc. E7-753 Filed 1-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
August 12, 1943

No. 48683.

Suit 4421.

#### Sears, *Roebuck & Co. et al.*v. *United States.*

Reap. Dec. 5728 affirmed. C. A. D. 246.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 250 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Gold Star Mothers Day. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2005 

Mr. COBURN (for himself, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. BYRD, Mr. 

CRAPO, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. LEVIN, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. THUNE, Mr. BUNNING, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. 

DORGAN, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. JOHNSON, and Mr. MARTINEZ) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Gold Star Mothers Day. 

Whereas the American Gold Star Mothers have suffered the 

supreme sacrifice of motherhood by losing sons and 

daughters who served in the Armed Forces, and thus perpetuate the memory of all whose lives were sacrificed in 

our wars; 

Whereas the American Gold Star Mothers assist veterans of 

the Armed Forces and their dependents in the presentation of claims to the Veterans’ Administration, and aid 

the men and women who served and died or were wounded or incapacitated during hostilities; 
2 

•SRES 250 ATS

Whereas the services rendered to the United States by the 

mothers of America have strengthened and inspired our 

Nation throughout our history; 

Whereas we honor ourselves and the mothers of America 

when we revere and emphasize the role of the home and 

the family as the true foundations of our Nation; 

Whereas by doing so much for the home, the American mother is a source of moral and spiritual guidance for the 

people of the United States and thus acts as a positive 

force to promote good government and peace among all 

mankind; and 

Whereas September 25, 2005, is being recognized as Gold 

Star Mothers Day: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of Gold Star 

3 Mothers Day; and 

4 (2) calls on the people of the United States to 

5 observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and 

6 activities. 

Æ
#### Rogers Peet Co. *v.*United States

No. 6720.

Entry No. 11962, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, December 16, 1941, etc.

Certified December 16, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., January 15, 1942, etc.

(Decided January 8, 1947)

*Lane & Wallace*and *Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, were filed to test the correctness of the action of the appraiser in including as a part of the dutiable values of the merchandise the so-called British purchase tax. The appeals have been submitted on a stipulation wherein counsel for the respective parties agree that the issues herein are similar in all material respects to the issues involved in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, and the record in that case has been admitted in evidence in this case.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise to be the values found by the appraiser, less any amounts added by the importer on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

Timmins Gold Corp. (the Company) is filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form
40-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Report).

I, Ian Harcus, Controller, performing the functions of Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



Name: Ian Harcus

Title:   Controller performing the functions of Chief
Financial Officer

Date:  March 20, 2017.

---
#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7571.

Entry Nos. 766811; 709944.

Invoices dated London, England, May 16, 1946, etc.

Certified May 16, 1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 7, 1946, etc.

(Decided March 25, 1948)

*John B. Bafter*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

The cited case has been incorporated herein by consent of the parties who further agree on a set of facts, embodied in a written stipulation submitting the present cases, showing export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values are the appraised values of the articles in question.
California High-Speed Rail Authority 

Fresno to Bakersfield 

Section 

Draft Supplemental 

Environmental Impact 

Report/Environmental 

Impact Statement 

Appendix 3.8-A 

Water Bodies Crossed by Project 

Alternatives 

November 2017 
Appendix 3.8-A 

Water Bodies Crossed by Project Alternatives 

November 2017 California High-Speed Rail Authority 

Fresno to Bakersfield Section 

Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS

This page intentionally left blank 
Table of Contents 

California High-Speed Rail Authority November 2017 

Fresno to Bakersfield Section Page | 3.8-A-1 

Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

APPENDIX 3.8-A: WATER BODIES CROSSED BY PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ............... 3.8-A-1
Table of Contents 

November 2017 California High-Speed Rail Authority 

3.8-A-2 | Page Fresno to Bakersfield Section 

Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS 

This page intentionally left blank 
Appendix 3.8-A 

Water Bodies Crossed by Project Alternatives 

California High-Speed Rail Authority November 2017 

Fresno to Bakersfield Section Page | 3.8-A-1 

Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS 

APPENDIX 3.8-A: WATER BODIES CROSSED BY PROJECT ALTERNATIVES 

Table 3.8-A-1 F-B LGA Alternative Waterbody Crossings 

Waterbody Name Approximate Crossing Width 

(feet)1

Type2 Crossing Type 

Calloway Canal 260 C Embankment or Retaining Wall

Friant-Kern Canal 230 C Viaduct or Elevated Structure

Beardsley Canal 423 C Viaduct or Elevated Structure

Beardsley Canal (2nd Crossing) 180 C Viaduct or Elevated Structure

Cross Valley Canal Underground C Elevated

Calloway Canal (2nd Crossing) 120 C Viaduct or Elevated Structure

Kern River 533 P Viaduct or Elevated Structure 

Stine Canal (Carrier Canal) 196 C Viaduct or Elevated Structure

Kern Island Canal3 Underground C Viaduct or Elevated Structure

East Side Canal Underground C Viaduct or Elevated Structure

1

 Crossing widths subject to change once F-B LGA is finalized. Crossing width is based on the F-B LGA limits of construction. 

2

 Type: C=canal 

P=perennial 

3 Canal is conveyed inside a culvert at the F-B LGA crossing. 
Appendix 3.8-A 

Water Bodies Crossed by Project Alternatives 

November 2017 California High-Speed Rail Authority 

3.8-A-2 | Page Fresno to Bakersfield Section 

Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS 

This page intentionally left blank
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SELVIN A. AVILA AMEZQUITA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-72582

Agency No. A073-978-383

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 24, 2011** 

Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Selvin A. Avila Amezquita, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s denial of his motion to reopen proceedings held in absentia. 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

FILED

JUN 02 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-72582

denial of a motion to reopen, Arrieta v. INS, 117 F.3d 429, 430 (9th Cir. 1997) (per

curiam), and we deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Avila Amezquita’s

motion to reopen where the record reflects that the hearing notice was sent by

certified mail to Avila Amezquita’s address of record and Avila Amezquita did not

provide any evidence to rebut the strong presumption of effective service. See id.

at 431 (“[N]otice by certified mail sent to an alien’s last known address can be

sufficient under the Act, even if no one signed for it.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

 

**CONTANGO ORE, INC.**

 

**Certification Required by Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

 

|   | I, Leah Gaines, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of Contango ORE, Inc. (the “Company”), certify that:                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
| 1.     | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
| 2.     | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

 

Date: October 28, 2020

 

|                                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/ LEAH GAINES                        |   |
| Leah Gaines                            |   |
| Chief Financial and Accounting Officer |   |
DISTRIBUTION OF THE 

DRAFT EIS

Section 8

8. Distribution of the Draft EIS
Springfield Rail Improvements Project 8-1 Tier 2 Draft Document 

8.0 Distribution of the Draft EIS 

The Tier 1 and Tier 2 Draft Environmental Impact Statements are being distributed to

the following federal, regional, state, and local agencies and other interested parties for

their review and comments.

Federal

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation

Department of the Army, Rock Island District, Corps of Engineers

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Natural Resources Conservation Service

U.S. Department of Agriculture

U.S. Department of Commerce

U.S. Department of Energy

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Region V

U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Rock Island Field Office

U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance

U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration

U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region V, Office of Environmental Review

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Federal Activities, Washington, D.C.

U.S. Senator Richard J. Durbin

U.S. Senator Mark Kirk

U.S. Representative Timothy V. “Tim” Johnson, District No. 15

U.S. Representative Aaron Schock, District No. 18

U.S. Representative John M. Shimkus, District No. 19

U.S. Representative Bobby Schilling, District No. 17

State Agencies ‐ Illinois

Illinois Bureau of the Budget

Illinois Commerce Commission

Illinois Department of Agriculture

Illinois Department of Corrections

Illinois Department of Natural Resources

Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Office of Mines and Minerals

Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Office of Water Resources

Illinois Department of Public Health

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Illinois Geological Survey

Illinois Historic Preservation Agency
Springfield Rail Improvements Project 8-2 Tier 2 Draft Document 

Illinois Natural History Survey

Illinois Nature Preserves Commission

Illinois State Clearinghouse

Illinois State Library

Illinois State Water Survey

Sub‐State Clearinghouses

Springfield‐Sangamon County Regional Planning Commission

Counties

Sangamon

Local Communities and Jurisdictions

Chatham

Grandview

Jerome

Leland Grove

Sherman

Southern View

Springfield

Other Agencies or Groups

Environmental Law and Policy Center

Lincoln Library

National Trust for Historic Preservation (Gaylord Building)

Township Officials of Illinois

United Counties Council of Illinois

Operating Railroads

Amtrak

Canadian National

CSX

Illinois & Midland Railroad

Kansas City Southern  

Norfolk Southern

Union Pacific
Case No. 13,290.

#### STANNARD v. The JOHN HART.

[Cited in The Richard Doane. Case No. 11,-765. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
No. 64314.

protests 58/3725, etc. (New York).

#### B. Altman & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.