alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION



In connection with the
annual report on Form 10-K of Universal Business Payment Solutions Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”) for the
period ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Bipin C. Shah, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: January 14, 2013 | /s/ Bipin C. Shah       | 
|---------------------- | ----------------------- | 
|                       | Bipin C. Shah           | 
|                       | Chief Executive Officer |
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 60 (Thursday, March 29, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 14678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5603]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 9313]
RIN 1545-BG29


Corporate Reorganizations; Additional Guidance on Distributions 
Under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 354(b)(1)(B); Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains correction to temporary regulations (TD 
9313) that were published in the Federal Register on Thursday, March 1, 
2007 (72 FR 9262) providing guidance regarding the qualification of 
certain transactions as reorganizations described in section 
368(a)(1)(D) where no stock and/or securities of the acquiring 
corporation are issued and distributed in the transaction.

DATES: This amendment is effective March 29, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bruce A. Decker at (202) 622-7550 (not 
a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The temporary regulations that are the subjects of this correction 
are under section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, temporary regulations (TD 9313) contain an error that 
may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification.

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1

    Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Correction of Publication

0
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is corrected by making the following 
amendments:

PART 1--INCOME TAXES

0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read, in 
part, as follows:

    Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *


0
Par. 2. Section 1.368-2T is amended by revising paragraph (l)(2)(iv) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  1.368-2T  Definition of terms (temporary).

* * * * *
    (l) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (iv) Exception. This paragraph (l)(2) of this section does not 
apply to a transaction otherwise described in Sec.  1.358-6(b)(2) or 
section 368(a)(1)(G) by reason of section 368(a)(2)(D).
* * * * *

LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, 
Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. E7-5603 Filed 3-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
----

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises

(2005/C 185/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----
Appendix B-7 

Accident Report Summary and Collision Diagrams
# CA2008179EN.01000101.xml

| 16.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 179/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 179/1

---

RESERVE LIST

   (1)

RESERVE LIST

(1

OPEN COMPETITION

OPEN COMPETITION

EPSO/AD/98/07

SENIOR AUDIT OFFICERS (AD 9)

SENIOR AUDIT OFFICERS

of Bulgarian, Czech, Estonian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Romanian, Slovenian and Slovakian citizenship

(2008/C 179 A/01)

Bulgarian citizenship

| ANGUELOVA | Iuliana |
| --- | --- |
| DIMITROVA (HRISTOVA) | Daniela |
| ZHELEZAROVA (TZVETKOVA) | Dilyanka |

ANGUELOVA

Iuliana

DIMITROVA (HRISTOVA)

Daniela

ZHELEZAROVA (TZVETKOVA)

Dilyanka

Czech citizenship

| DRAPAL | Stanislav |
| --- | --- |

DRAPAL

Stanislav

Estonian citizenship

| TULVA (TAMMSAAR) | Kristi |
| --- | --- |

TULVA (TAMMSAAR)

Kristi

Lithuanian citizenship

| JUOZULYNAS | Arunas |
| --- | --- |

JUOZULYNAS

Arunas

Maltese citizenship

| MANICOLO | Romilda |
| --- | --- |
| PISANI | Raymond |

MANICOLO

Romilda

PISANI

Raymond

Romanian citizenship

| JINARU (DUMITRESCU) | Daniela |
| --- | --- |
| MARDARE | Maria |
| MORARU (TANTANA) | Dana |

JINARU (DUMITRESCU)

Daniela

MARDARE

Maria

MORARU (TANTANA)

Dana

Slovenian citizenship

| EKER | Natasa |
| --- | --- |

EKER

Natasa

Slovakian citizenship

NO SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE

The reserve list will be valid until 31 December 2009 and may be extended.

31 December 2009

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
APPENDIX F-P 

Vegetation Mapping Surveys 

I 

0 4 20 0 80Meters 0 2 120 40 480Feet

F-P-1
#*

1 plant in wash parallel to 15

I 

0 50 100 200Meters 0 305 610 1,220Feet

F-P-2
#*

#*

#*

#*

1 veg. only plant in wash.

1 plant in wash para. to I-15

1 plant in wash para.. to I15.

1 plant in wash parallel to 15

I 

0 50 100 200Meters 0 310 620 1,240Feet

F-P-3
#*

1 plant on road offff ROW.

I 

0 50 100 200Meters 0 315 630 1,260Feet

F-P-4
#*

#*

#*

#*

2 plants in perp. wash.

4 plants in perp. wash.

1 plant wash perp. to I-15.

3-bloom; 1 veg. only in wash

I 

0 50 100 200Meters 0 320 640 1,280Feet

F-P-5
#*

#*

#*

2 plants in perp. wash.

4 plants in perp. wash.

1 lant in wash para. to I-15

I 

0 50 100 200Meters 0 325 650 1,300Feet

F-P-6
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                             |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------|
|   |   |                             |
|   |   |                             |
|   |   |                             |   |
|   | By:    | /s/ John      G. Sharkey    |   |
|   |   | Vice      President-Finance      |   |
|   |   | and      Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |   |                             |   |
|   |   | April      8, 2010               |   |
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 52 

Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in the crypt beneath the 

Rotunda of the Capitol in connection with memorial services to be conducted in the Supreme Court Building for the late honorable William 

H. Rehnquist, Chief Justice of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2005 

Mr. FRIST (for himself, Mr. REID, Mr. LOTT, and Mr. DODD) submitted the 

following concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in the crypt 

beneath the Rotunda of the Capitol in connection with 

memorial services to be conducted in the Supreme Court 

Building for the late honorable William H. Rehnquist, 

Chief Justice of the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That the Architect of the Capitol is author3 ized and directed to transfer to the custody of the Su4 preme Court of the United States the catafalque which 

5 is situated in the crypt beneath the Rotunda of the Capitol 

6 so that such catafalque may be used in the Supreme Court 

7 Building in connection with services to be conducted there 
2 

SCON 52 ATS

1 for the late honorable William H. Rehnquist, Chief Justice 

2 of the United States. 

Æ
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0865 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-199-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 29, 2020

No. 04-20-00149-CR

Christopher Timmy BRADY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 556329

Honorable Kevin M. O’Connell, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK 

OF JURISDICTION. 

It is so ORDERED on April 29, 2020.

_____________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of April, 2020.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
# Official Journal C 279/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 279 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6413 July 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 279

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6413 July 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 279/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10302 — Standard Industries/Grace) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2021/C 279/02 | Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.10273 — ArcelorMittal/Liberty Steel France) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 279/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10302 — Standard Industries/Grace) (
  1
  )

1

1

2021/C 279/02

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.10273 — ArcelorMittal/Liberty Steel France) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 279/03 | Euro exchange rates — 12 July 2021 | 3 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2021/C 279/04 | Update of the list of border crossing points as referred to in Article 2(8) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 279/03

Euro exchange rates — 12 July 2021

3

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2021/C 279/04

Update of the list of border crossing points as referred to in Article 2(8) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code)

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 279/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10340 — Goldman Sachs/Adapteo) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 11 |
| 2021/C 279/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10293 — Gilde Fund VI/EDCO) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 13 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 279/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10340 — Goldman Sachs/Adapteo) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

11

2021/C 279/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10293 — Gilde Fund VI/EDCO) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

13

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
(logo) C-III | C-III AssetManagement  

 

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

**C-III Asset Management LLC**

 

 

The undersigned, Barry Davis,President of C-III Asset Management LLC (*f/k/a Centerline Servicing LLC*),the Special Servicer under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement datedas of December 1, 2015, relating to the **Wells Fargo Commercial MortgageTrust 2015-P2, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-P2**(the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.       a review of the activities of the Special Servicer andof its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement during thecalendar year 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) has been made under the undersigned’ssupervision;

 

2.       to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based onsuch review, the Special Servicer maintained an effective internal controlsystem relating to its servicing of the Mortgage Loans serviced by it and hasfulfilled in all material respects its obligations under the Pooling andServicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Capitalized terms nototherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling andServicing Agreement.

 

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, as of the 1st day of March, 2019, I have hereuntosigned my name.

 

 

/s/ Barry Davis

**Barry Davis**, President

C-III Asset Management LLC, a

Delaware limited liabilitycompany 

 

 

WFCM 2015-P2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

MARGARET A. POWELL 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Civil Action 2:12-cv-746 

Judge Michael H. Watson 

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

Defendant. 

ORDER 

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the March 28, 2013 Report 

and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. ECF No. 21. The Magistrate Judge 

recommended that the Court grant Plaintiff's Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees and 

Costs Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act and award attorneys' fees and costs 

in the amount of $3,645. 

The Report and Recommendation specifically advises the parties that the failure 

to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of the Report results 

in a "waiver of the right to de novo review ... by the District Judge and waiver of the 

right to appeal the judgment of the District Court." Report and Recommendation 6, 

ECF No. 21. The time period for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation 

has expired. The Commissioner has not objected to the Report and Recommendation. 

Case: 2:12-cv-00746-MHW-EPD Doc #: 22 Filed: 04/23/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such 

objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for an Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs Pursuant to 

the Equal Access to Justice Act is GRANTED. ECF No. 18. Accordingly, Plaintiff is 

AWARDED attorneys fees' and costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 

U.S.C. § 2412, in the amount of $3,645. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

2 

MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

Case: 2:12-cv-00746-MHW-EPD Doc #: 22 Filed: 04/23/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 15.1
 
 CONSENT OF EUROMONITOR INTERNATIONAL LTD
 
 We hereby consent to the use by Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc. (the “Company”), in connection with its Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2012 on Form 20-F, and any amendments and supplements thereto (collectively, the “Annual Report”), of excerpts from our report dated May 2012, as amended and supplemented from time to time (the “Euromonitor Report”), the preliminary estimates we provided to the Company (the “Preliminary Estimates”), the information contained in the Euromonitor Report and the Preliminary Estimates (the “Intellectual Property”) and the use of our name in the Annual Report. We confirm that we have reviewed the references to the Euromonitor Report and the Preliminary Estimates in the Annual Report dated April 26, 2013, and we consent to this use of the Intellectual Property. We also confirm that we have reviewed references to the Intellectual Property and that they are quoted in an appropriate context.
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-187531 on Form F-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-173496 on Form S-8 of the Intellectual Property appearing in the Annual Report.
 
 Euromonitor International LtdBy:
/s/ Tom KitchinName:
Tom KitchinTitle:
Director
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________

No. 13-3144

____________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

TUYEN QUANG PHAM,

 Appellant

____________

On Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(E.D. Pa. 5-08-cr-00427-004)

District Judge: Honorable Legrome D. Davis

____________

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

July 9, 2015

Before: FISHER, JORDAN and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges.

____________

JUDGMENT ORDER

____________

This cause came on to be considered on the record from the United States District 

Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and was submitted pursuant to Third 

Circuit LAR 34.1(a) on September 8, 2014. After consideration of all contentions raised 

by the Appellant, it is now hereby

ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this Court that the judgment of the District Court 

entered June 27, 2013, be and the same is hereby VACATED for the same reasons stated 

in this Court's decision in United States v. Bui, 769 F.3d 831 (3d Cir. 2014). Appellant's 
petition is GRANTED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent 

with this order.

By the Court,

s/ D. Michael Fisher 

Circuit Judge

Attest:

s/Marcia M. Waldron

Clerk

Dated: July 9, 2015
.{^OFALToo ^ 

Department of Administration 

1301 Twelfth Stiret Suite 100 

Altoona, PA 16601 

(814) 04»-24ae 

fax (614) Mt-2411 

April 20, 2010 

e mail: council@altoonapa.gov 

website: www.altoonapa.qov 

OoT-osT-aoos-U^MC. 

MAYOR 

William Schirf 

COUNCIL MEMBERS 

David Bulteitaugh 

Erik Cagle 

Maris Gels 

Bnice Kelley 

Jan Mills, Sr. 

William Neugebauer 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany, Chief 

Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of the Secretary of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 02590 

RE: Support for the Altoona-Blair County Airport Authority to 

Recommend Colgan Air 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

Please accept this letter in support of the Altoona-Blair County Airport 

Authority's recommendation that Colgan Air, Inc., operating as United 

Express, continue to serve as operator of essential air service at the AltoonaBlair County Airport. 

The Washington, DC Dulles service offered by Colgan Air/United Express is a 

popular connection for many of our residents and business people. Colgan 

also offers dependable, safe and affordable air transportation at the AltoonaBlair County Airport facility. 

Therefore, we support the retention of Colgan Air/United Express and look 

forward to their continued quality air service to the Altoona-Blair County 

Airport and the residents of the City of Altoona. 

Sincerely, 

William Schirf, Mayor 

City of Altoona 

Printed on Recycled Paper
No. 46306.

#### Protest 987624-G of Shun Ying Chong & Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the drugs in question are similar to those passed upon in *Oy Wo Tong*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372), as amended by Abstract 44821. In accordance therewith the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was sustained.