alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of QR Energy, LP (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Cedric W. Burgher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 26, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Cedric W. Burgher  
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Cedric W. Burgher      
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
1 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont 

____________________ 

NO. 09-17-00285-CV 

____________________ 

IN RE COMMITMENT OF ROYAL LEE SMITH 

________________________________________________________________________ 

On Appeal from the 435th District Court 

Montgomery County, Texas 

Trial Cause No. 14-03-03232-CV

________________________________________________________________________ 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Royal Lee Smith was determined to be a sexually violent predator and 

committed for sex offender treatment. See In re Commitment of Smith, No. 09-14-

00400-CV, 2015 WL 1843526, at *1 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Apr. 23, 2015, no pet.) 

(mem. op.). On June 19, 2017, the trial court signed an order denying Smith’s motion 

for change of venue. Smith filed a notice of appeal. We questioned our jurisdiction 

and the parties filed responses. 

Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. HarCon Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Smith argues the order denying his 
2 

motion for a change of venue disposed of all pending claims and parties. In a civil 

commitment case, however, the trial court retains jurisdiction while the commitment 

order remains in effect. See In re Commitment of Cortez, 405 S.W.3d 929, 932 (Tex. 

App.—Beaumont 2013, no pet.). Smith has not identified a signed order by the trial 

court that is appealable at this time. 

We requested responses regarding whether the appeal was frivolous. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 45. Other than arguing that an order denying a motion to change venue is 

a final judgment, Smith does not address this Court’s suggestion that his appeal is 

frivolous. “To determine whether an appeal is objectively frivolous, we review the 

record from the viewpoint of the advocate and decide whether the advocate had 

reasonable grounds to believe the case could be reversed.” Glassman v. Goodfriend, 

347 S.W.3d 772, 782 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, pet. denied). 

In a civil commitment case, the trial court must review a case every two years 

to determine whether a requirement should be modified or probable cause exists to 

believe that the person’s behavioral abnormality has changed to the extent that the 

person is no longer likely to engage in a predatory act of sexual violence. See Tex. 

Health & Safety Code Ann. § 841.102 (West 2017). Furthermore, a request to 

change the forum in which a case will be heard necessarily implies that further 

proceedings will be conducted on that case. We conclude that the appeal is frivolous. 
3 

See Tex. R. App. P. 45. In the event Smith files a frivolous appeal with this Court in 

the future, the Court will consider imposing sanctions. See id.  

The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); 

43.2(f). 

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

 

 

 ________________________________ 

 STEVE McKEITHEN 

 Chief Justice 

Submitted on September 27, 2017 

Opinion Delivered September 28, 2017 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

June 25, 2003

Wachovia Bank, National Association
191 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia  30303

         Re:      Credit and Security Agreement dated as of November 15, 2001,
                  among Thomas & Betts Corporation (the "Borrower"), the lenders
                  party thereto (the "Lenders"), and Wachovia Bank, National
                  Association (f/k/a Wachovia Bank, N.A.), as administrative
                  agent for the Lenders (the "Agent"), as amended by that
                  certain First Amendment to Credit and Security Agreement and
                  Agreement to Release, dated as of March 25, 2002, as further
                  amended by that certain Second Amendment to Credit and
                  Security Agreement, dated as of June 21, 2002, as further
                  amended by that certain Third Amendment to Credit and Security
                  Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2003, as further amended
                  by that certain Fourth Amendment to Credit and Security
                  Agreement dated as of May 15, 2003 (as the same may be further
                  amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from
                  time to time, the "Credit Agreement").

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Section 2.07 of the Credit Agreement, the Borrower hereby notifies
the Agent of the termination of the total amount of the Commitments (as defined
in the Credit Agreement), effective June 25, 2003. As of the date hereof, there
are no Loans (as defined in the Credit Agreement) and from and after the date
hereof, there shall be no Loans outstanding under the terms and conditions of
the Credit Agreement.

The Borrower acknowledges that it continues to be obligated to Wachovia Bank,
National Association (individually, and together with Wachovia Securities, Inc.,
collectively, "Wachovia") for obligations with respect to letters of credit
issued by Wachovia, for obligations relating to foreign exchange agreements and
for treasury management services, among other things.

The existing letters of credit issued by Wachovia under the terms and conditions
of the Credit Agreement will constitute a portion of the letter of credit
facility provided under the Borrower's new credit facility with Wachovia and a
syndicate of other banks (the

<PAGE>

"New Facility). The letter of credit facility will be secured by the Collateral
which will secure the New Facility, and the existing Credit Agreement shall be
terminated. In addition, in the event that the New Facility does not become
effective on or prior to June 25, 2003, the Borrower agrees to pledge in favor
of Wachovia cash collateral equal to at least 105% of the outstanding Continuing
Obligations with respect to letters of credit, which pledge shall be made
pursuant to documents in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Wachovia
in its sole discretion.

Sincerely,

/s/ Thomas C. Oviatt

Thomas C. Oviatt
Vice President-Treasurer
EXHIBIT 4.2
 THIS WARRANT AND THE SECURITIES ISSUABLE UPON THE EXERCISE HEREOF HAVE NOT BEEN
REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933. THEY MAY NOT BE SOLD, OFFERED FOR
SALE, PLEDGED, HYPOTHECATED, OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN
EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, OR AN OPINION OF
COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED UNDER SUCH ACT
OR UNLESS SOLD PURSUANT TO RULE 144 UNDER SUCH ACT.
 WARRANT TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK
of TOREADOR RESOURCES CORPORATION
 Warrant No. 040
    
    Void after July 22, 2009
  Purchase Shares
 Exercise Price
 Exercise Period
 Method of Exercise




---



##### 



Put Right
   2




---



##### 



Accredited Investor
 Investment Representation
 Certificates for Shares
 Issuance of Shares
 Adjustment of Exercise Price and Number of Shares
 Subdivisions, Combinations and Other Issuances
 3




---



##### 



Reclassification, Reorganization and Consolidation
 Carry Over of Adjustments
 Discretionary Reduction in Exercise Price
 Notice of Adjustment
 Other Notices
 (i)
    
    the Company shall declare any
dividend or distribution upon its shares of Common Stock payable
in shares;(ii)
    
    the Company shall offer for
subscription pro rata to the holders of its shares of Common
Stock any additional shares of any class or other rights;(iii)
    
    there shall be any capital
reorganization or reclassification of the capital stock of the
Company, or consolidation, amalgamation or merger of the Company
with, or sale of all or substantially all of its assets to,
another corporation; or
 4




---



##### 



(iv)
    
    there shall be a voluntary
dissolution, liquidation or winding-up of the Company,
  Shares to be Reserved
 No Fractional Shares or Scrip
 No Stockholder Rights
 Participation in Rights Distribution
 5




---



##### 



Transfers of Warrant
 Replacement
 Successors and Assigns
 Amendments and Waivers
 Notices
 Captions
 Governing Law
 6




---



##### 



TOREADOR RESOURCES CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Nigel J. LovettName:
    Nigel J. LovettTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer  /s/ Dianne BrandDianne Brand
 7




---



##### 



FORM OF ELECTION TO EXERCISE
  
 
 (a) multiplied by (b)]
  
 
 Direction as to Registration
 Name of Registered Holder:Address of Registered Holder:
 8




---



##### 



FORM OF ASSIGNMENT
  
  
 
 Signature:(Signature must conform in all respect to name of
holder as specified on the face of the Warrant.)(Insert Social Security or Other Identifying Number
of Holder)
 9
California High-Speed Rail Authority 

Fresno to Bakersfield 

Section 

Draft Supplemental 

Environmental Impact 

Report/Environmental 

Impact Statement 

Appendix 3.6-C 

Energy Analysis Memorandum 

November 2017 
Appendix 3.6-C 

Energy Analysis Memorandum 

November 2017 California High-Speed Rail Authority 

Fresno to Bakersfield Section 

Administrative Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS 

This page intentionally left blank 
Appendix 3.6-C 

Energy Analysis Memorandum 

California High-Speed Rail Authority November 2017 

Fresno to Bakersfield Section Page | 3.6-C-1 

Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS 

APPENDIX 3.6-C: ENERGY ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM 

A number of technical appendices included as part of the Fresno to Bakersfield Section Final 

EIR/EIS have not been recreated for the purposes of this Draft Supplemental Environmental 

Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) because the information contained 

within the technical appendix would remain applicable to the F-B LGA. Appendix 3.6-C did not 

require an update for the F-B LGA analysis and therefore is not included in Volume II of the 

Fresno to Bakersfield Section Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS. To review the appendix in its entirety, 

please refer to the Authority’s Final EIR/EIS: Fresno to Bakersfield website. 
Appendix 3.6-C 

Energy Analysis Memorandum 

November 2017 California High-Speed Rail Authority 

3.6-C-2 | Page Fresno to Bakersfield Section 

Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS 

This page intentionally left blank
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Torotel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending October 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dale H. Sizemore, Jr.,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Dale H. Sizemore, Jr. |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |
|                           |
| Dale H. Sizemore, Jr.     |
| Chief Executive Officer        |
| December 9,  2005         |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THOMASTON MILLS, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                           1,942
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                       415
<INVENTORY>                                     49,436
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                98,506
<PP&E>                                         236,056
<DEPRECIATION>                                 151,748
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 184,934
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,516
<BONDS>                                         36,307
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,494
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,713
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   184,934
<SALES>                                        137,085
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               137,248
<CGS>                                          128,367
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,367
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,132
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,786
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,037)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,154)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,883)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,883)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.29)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6670
ANDREW SULLIVAN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-3423-6BD) Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 14, 1997 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrew Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Sullivan v. South Carolina , No. CA-96-3423-6BD (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Hannah Lee, Chief Financial Officer of Global Education & Technology Group Limited (the Company), hereby certifies, to the
best of his knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.

Date: June 27, 2011



|    |  |                |  |                        
|--- |  | -------------- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Hannah Lee
|    |  | Name:          |  | Hannah Lee             
|    |  | Title:         |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 35.1




Statement of Compliance of The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee.




I, Pierre Boutros, Vice President of The Bank of New York Mellon, a New York corporation (the “Trustee”), state:




(a) A review of the Trustee’s activities for the period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 (the “Reporting Period”) and of the Trustee’s performance under the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated July 15, 2010 between MS Structured Asset Corp. as depositor (the “Depositor”) and the Trustee, as trustee and securities intermediary, in each case amended by a series supplement between the Depositor and the Trustee (as amended in each such case, the “Trust Agreement”), has been made under my supervision.




(b)  To the best of my knowledge and based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period for Floating Rate Trust Series 2010-04 (IP)


The Bank of New York Mellon, as TrusteeDate: March 2, 2012

/s/Pierre BoutrosPierre BoutrosVice President
AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE


     This Amendment to that certain Promissory Note, dated December 20, 1996, in
the principal amount of $2,300,000 (the "Note"), given by Tipperary Corporation,
as "Maker" therein, to Slough Parks Incorporated, as "Lender" therein, is made
this 15th day of December, 1997, by and between said Maker and Lender.

     WHEREAS, the parties wish to extend the maturity date of the Note:

     IT IS THEREFORE agreed that, upon the condition that the Lender obtains the
consent of Colorado National Bank, as provided in that certain Subordination
Agreement, dated December 20, 1996 (to which the Note is subject as provided in
Section 12 thereof), Section 2 of the Note is amended and restated in its
entirety to read as follows:

               2.   Maturity.  The unpaid principal balance of this Note,
          together with accrued and unpaid interest.  Shall be due and payable
          in full on October 31, 1998.

     All other terms and provisions of the Note shall remain unchanged.


TIPPERARY CORPORATION                   SLOUGH PARKS INCORPORATED

                                   
By: /s/ David L. Bradshaw               By: /s/ Marshall D. Lees
    --------------------------------        -----------------------------------
    David L. Bradshaw, President            Marshall D. Lees, President
    and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 18, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 19387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7257]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 07-1447; RM-10798]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Annville, Manchester, Mt. Vernon, 
West Liberty, KY

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; denial of petition for reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document denies a Petition for Reconsideration filed 
jointly by Vernon R. Baldwin, Inc., Morgan County Industries, Inc., and 
Vernon R. Baldwin (``Petitioners'') directed to a letter which returned 
their Joint Petition for Rule Making (``Joint Petition''). The Joint 
Petition was defective because the proposed site at Mt. Vernon failed 
to provide a 70 dBu signal over the entire community due to terrain 
obstruction. This document finds that it is not in the public interest 
to allow Petitioners on reconsideration to reinstate and amend their 
Joint Petition with a new site because a Petition for Rule Making must 
be technically correct at the time of filing. With this action, the 
proceeding is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helen McLean, Media Bureau (202) 418-
2738.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order, adopted March 28, 2007, and released 
March 30, 2007. The full text of this Commission decision is available 
for inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC's 
Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Room 
CY-A257, and Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision 
may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, 
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, 
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or www.BCPIWEB.com. This 
document is not subject to the Congressional Review Act. (The 
Commission, is, therefore, not required to submit a copy of this 
Memorandum Opinion and Order to the Government Accountability Office, 
pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) 
because the petition for reconsideration was denied.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. E7-7257 Filed 4-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P