alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

RICK A. SLORP,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

LERNER, SAMPSON & CASE NO. 2:12-cv-498

ROTHFUSS, et al., JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE NORAH MCCANN KING

Defendants.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the OPINION AND ORDER filed March 8, 2013, JUDGMENT is

hereby entered DISMISSING this action.

Date: March 8, 2013 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 32 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7332]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel ``Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research 
Centers: Special Interest Project Competitive Supplements (Panel 7),'' 
Request for Application Number (RFA) DP07-002

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces a meeting of the aforementioned Special 
Emphasis Panel.

    Time and Date: 12 p.m.-4 p.m., June 5, 2007 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of research grant applications received 
in response to RFA DP07-002, ``Health Promotion and Disease 
Prevention Research Centers: Special Interest Project Competitive 
Supplements (Panel 7).''
    Contact Person for More Information: Sheree Marshall Williams, 
PhD, M.Sc., Scientific Review Administrator, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., MS D72, Atlanta, GA 
30333, telephone 404.639.4896.

    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: April 10, 2007.
Elaine L. Baker
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E7-7332 Filed 4-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Exhibit 4.12





ADDENDUM No. 2


to


the Management Agreement dated 16/05/2011 and any addenda thereto


(the "Management Agreement")





Between


POLYARISTI NAVIGATION CO.


of Liberia


(as Owner)





And





ALLSEAS MARINE S.A.


of Liberia


(as Manager)





In respect of the management of the Vessel BOX VOYAGER (the "Vessel")





Notwithstanding the relevant provisions of the Management Agreement, it is this, 18th day of September 2012, mutually agreed between the Owner and the Manager that a clause 8.05 shall be added to read as follows:





"Unless the agreement is terminated by the Owner in accordance with Clauses 12.03 (iii) and (iv) of this Agreement or by reason of default by gross negligence or misconduct of Manager, its Directors, officers and/or employees in the performance under this Agreement, upon termination of this Agreement in relation to the Vessel, the Management Fee will be continued at the above rate then in effect for 90 days from the date of termination. This is to cover operating and accounting cost of finalizing the Vessels' disbursements, demurrage, etc. In addition, the Owner shall continue to pay the following:





i)
Crew support costs for a further period of three calendar months


ii)
An equitable proportion of any management staff redundancy costs which may materialize.





Notwithstanding the above, in the event that the Management Agreement is terminated in accordance with Clause 12.05, then the provisions of the Compensation Agreement between the Manager and Box Ships Inc. dated 12/09/2012, copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, forming an integral part of this Agreement, or any renewal thereof shall be applied."





All other fees, terms, conditions and provisions of the Management Agreement remain unaltered and in full force and effect.





IN WITNESS WHEREOFthe parties have signed this Addendum this 18th day of September, 2012.


FOR THE OWNER
FOR THE MANAGER/s/ Maria Stefanou
/s/  George SkrimizeasMARIA STEFANOU
GEORGE SKRIMIZEASAttorney-in-fact
Attorney-in-fact
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 249 

Commemorating the Oahu All-Stars for winning the 2005 Cal Ripken World 

Series and the Hawaii Warriors for winning the 2005 Continental Amateur Baseball Association World Series (ages 9-under). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2005 

Mr. AKAKA (for himself and Mr. INOUYE) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the Oahu All-Stars for winning the 2005 

Cal Ripken World Series and the Hawaii Warriors for 

winning the 2005 Continental Amateur Baseball Association World Series (ages 9-under). 

Whereas on August 21, 2005, the Oahu All-Stars won the 

2005 Cal Ripken World Series; 

Whereas the team from Oahu worked together in the 1 hit 

shutout title game to beat the series reigning champs, 

Team Mexico; 

Whereas the manager and coaching staff, Gerald Oda, Keith 

Oda, and Staphe Fujimoto, respectively, had the ability 

to instill 14 boys from Oahu with the confidence and 

skills needed to succeed in a world competition; 
2 

•SRES 249 ATS

Whereas Kewby Meyer was named the Most Outstanding 

Player in the series; 

Whereas Kewby Meyer, Timmy Arakawa, Gavin Okada, and 

Kalani Lagoc-Crawford were named to the 2005 United 

States All World Series Team and Kash Kalohelani, 

Ryan Cortez, and Ryan Yamane were named to the 2005 

All Defensive Team; 

Whereas on August 5, 2005, the Hawaii Warriors won the 

2005 Continental Amateur Baseball Association World 

Series (ages 9-under) championship game; 

Whereas the team battled from behind in the final innings of 

the championship game to beat the Cincinnati Flames 

and complete the series with a perfect 9-0 record; and 

Whereas all of the teams’ players showed tremendous dedication throughout their tournaments toward the goal of 

winning World Series Championships and displayed great 

class and sportsmanship in victory: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commends the Oahu All-Stars for winning 

3 the 2005 Cal Ripken World Series title game and 

4 the Hawaii Warriors for winning the 2005 Conti5 nental Amateur Baseball Association World Series 

6 (ages 9-under); 

7 (2) recognizes the achievements of all the 

8 teams’ players, coaches, and support staff, and in9 vites them to the United States Capitol to be hon10 ored; 

11 (3) urges the President to— 
3 

•SRES 249 ATS

1 (A) recognize the achievements of the 

2 Oahu All-Star team and the Hawaii Warriors 

3 team; and 

4 (B) invite the teams to the White House 

5 for an appropriate ceremony honoring these 

6 world championship teams; and 

7 (4) directs the Secretary of the Senate to make 

8 available enrolled copies of this resolution to the 

9 Oahu All-Star team and the Hawaii Warriors team 

10 for appropriate display. 

11

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Oct-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 May-2-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jul-31-1998
<CASH>                                         292
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  23,714
<ALLOWANCES>                                   651
<INVENTORY>                                    14,228
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               43,187
<PP&E>                                         79,821
<DEPRECIATION>                                 53,733
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 71,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          27,427
<BONDS>                                        36,745
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       34,393
<OTHER-SE>                                     (57,998)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   71,674
<SALES>                                        106,955
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,955
<CGS>                                          97,870
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  106,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,130
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,967
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,715)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,715)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,715)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.87)
        

</TABLE>
PUBLIC LAW 104–241—OCT. 9, 1996 110 STAT. 3141

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 657 (S. 549):

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–315 (Comm. on Commerce).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 104–76 accompanying S. 549 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 141 (1995): Nov. 13, considered and passed House.

Vol. 142 (1996): Sept. 27, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–241

104th Congress

An Act

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the construction

of three hydroelectric projects in the State of Arkansas.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINES.

Notwithstanding the time limitations of section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, upon the request of the licensee for FERC Projects

numbered 4204, 4660, and 4659 (and after reasonable notice), is

authorized, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and

public interest requirements of such section 13 and the Commission’s procedures under such section, to extend the time required

for commencement of construction for the project for up to a maximum of 3 consecutive 2-year periods. This section shall take effect

for the project upon the expiration of the extension (issued by

the Commission under such section 13) of the period required

for commencement of construction of such project.

Approved October 9, 1996.

Effective date.

Oct. 9, 1996

[H.R. 657]
No. 49825.

#### Protest 103904-K of Joseph Dixon Crucible Co. (Charleston).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Prom the testimony of a representative of the plaintiff and that of the inspector and the deputy collector, the court held that only 233 out of 250 bags were imported and therefore directed the collector to reliquidate the entry, assessing duty on the basis of the imported quantity.
## Draft Proposal E-2

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Existing Buildings Code (IEBC).

Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft code

change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/deve lopment/iebc_concepts



## Repair Definition (E-2)

Objective: Expand definition of “repair” to include retrofits and changes to energy systems.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Section 202 as follows:

The restoration to good or sound condition or renewal of any part of an existing building

that is not an alteration for the purpose of its maintenance

.

Reason: For consistency with the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC). The

terms “good” and “sound” are not used in the 2012 IECC and are subjective. The wording “for

the purpose of its maintenance” is a reason for the text but not relevant to a definition. Who

determines if something is necessary for maintenance and what metric is to be used? Simply

saying “restoration or renewal,” along with the clarification that it is other than an alteration,

would clarify this term in the code. This is especially important because this definition and the

definition of alteration are key to determining which of Chapters 6, 7, 8, and/or 9 are applicable

to the work being conducted.

Cost Impact: There is no cost impact other than ensuring that maybe something that might not

have been considered within the scope of the International Existing Buildings Code (IEBC)

would now, through clarification, be considered.
# C_2008207EN.01000202.xml

| 14.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5086 — BAT/Skandinavisk Tobakskompagni)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 207/03)

On 27 June 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5086. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5086. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Before the Third Division,

May 27, 1946

No. 51166.

#### Petitions 6341-R, etc., of Sears Roebuck & Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

From the testimony of the appraiser at the port of entry and the admissions of counsel for the Government it appeared that the customs broker for the importer, in making entry, overlooked a column on the invoice which set forth a higher value on the date of exportation than the invoice price. This item was also overlooked by the examiner. From the entire record *296it was held that the entry of the merchandise at values lower than those found on final appraisement was without intent to defraud the Government or to deceive its officials. The petitions were therefore granted.
**
Exhibit 34.2 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP) 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

U.S. Bank National Association 

We have examined management’s****assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment ofCompliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the U.S.Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities****Platform (the “Platform”), for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration, registrar and paying agent services, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2019, exceptfor****servicing criteria Items 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(v), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(v)-(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respectto the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’scompliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established bythe American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise thePlatform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred eitherprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that the evidencewe obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedservicing criteria as of and for the year ended March 31, 2018, for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Minneapolis,Minnesota 

May 22, 2019 
**
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Todd Shipyards Corporation (“we”, “us”, “our”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 3, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of our operations.








Date: November 10, 2010

















/s/ Berger A. Dodge


Berger A. Dodge,


Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 34.11



|     |  |                                                                                                                              
|---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Plante & Moran, PLLC
10 South Riverside Plaza 9th Floor Chicago, IL 60606
Tel: 312.207.1040 Fax:
312.207.1066 plantemoran.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors

National Tax Search, LLC

We have examined National Tax Search, LLC (the Company) compliance with Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for the National Tax Search TaxQ system (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company has determined that only
certain servicing criteria, 1112(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this
report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.

Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements
assertion about the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included a selection of a
sample of transactions and compliance activities related to the Platform during the examination period and determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our
testing of selected transactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations, reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures did not include determining whether errors may have
occurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2015 for the Platform is fairly stated in all material respects.



/s/ Plante & Moran, PLCC


Chicago, IL

January 18,
2016



LOGO
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFCFO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trinity CapitalCorporation, a New Mexico corporation (the “Company”), for the period ended March 31,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), Daniel R. Bartholomew as Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of my knowledge:

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Daniel R. Bartholomew |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Daniel R. Bartholomew     |   |
| Chief Financial Officer   |   |
| May 10, 2006         |   |

 

 

28

----