alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EPA States Consultation and Coordination Webinar on Potential Reinterpretation of

Clean Water Act TAS

September 3 , 2015 2:00

– 4:00 p.m. EDT

Webinar Summary

Presenters: Tom Gardner

, EPA Office of Science and Technology

Tod Siegal, EPA Office of General Counsel

Moderator: Luke Cole, EPA Office of Science and Technology

Participants: See last page

– about 20 p articipants attended

P RESENTATION S UMMARY

The webinar began with introductions and instructions for participants, followed by a

presentation by Mr. Gardner and Mr. Siegal based on briefing slides available in the docket for

the rulemaking at www.regulations.gov . Search for Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 2014

- 0461

.

The webinar continued with an opportunity for questions and comments from state participants.

Questions were submitted by participants either in writing through the chat window to the EPA

moderator, Mr. Cole , or over th e phone after the phone lines were opened.

The following is a list of questions received from state participants during the webinar. For each

of the questions, the EPA presenters provided responses that were consistent with the

presentation materials and other information available at http://www.epa.gov/wqs

- tech/revised

interpretation

- clean

- water

- act

- tribal

- provision

. V iews and comments provided were

acknowl edged.

Q UESTIONS AND C OMMENTS

 Would you explain the bullet for TAS for new clean water act programs?

 What counts as "reservation lands" ?

 What is the difference between this proposal versus the 2014 proposal?

 Will the SAFETEA

- LU requirements for Oklahom a tribes trigger a case

- by

- case analysis

as mentioned on one of the slides (maybe slide 12?), rather than the blanket assumption

provided by this proposed interpretive rule?

 Will this action be affected by the ongoing litigation between Wyoming and EPA on TAS

boundary irregularities related to the Wind River Indian Reservation? The current

litigation is related to CAA.

 EPA had suggested that it met with both states and tribes in several meetings, can you give

a breakdown ?W EBINAR A TTENDEES

First Name Last Name Affiliation

Julia Anastasio ACWA

Iona Black Yale

Michelle Bushman Western States Water Council

Nephi Cole Wyoming Government

Trevor Flynn Kansas Dept. of Health and Environment

Jason Garber

Melissa Gildersleeve Washington State

Andrew Hanson US EPA

Sylvia Heaton MDEQ

Susan Kirsch ACWA

Les Lemm Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources

Jeromy Pankratz Office of the Attorney General, State of South Dakota

Michael Rivera CA Assembly

- District 31

Kimberly Roth NEIWPCC

Gina Shirey State of Alaska/Department of Environmental Conservation

Derek Smthee Oklahoma Water Resources Board

Debra Sturdevant Oregon DEQ

Maja Tritt EPA

Adriene Weaver NCDENR/DWR

Kent Woodmansey
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Toreador Resources Corporation;
 (2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 (3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operation and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 (4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     (5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: August 9, 2007/s/ Charles J. CampiseCharles J. CampiseVice President - Finance & Accounting and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 9, 2016

d1206 

# Order

Clerk December 9, 2016

153652

MICHAEL S. SHERMAN, D.O., P.C., d/b/a

PHYSICIAN EYE CARE ASSOCIATES OF

GARDEN CITY, and MICHAEL S.

SHERMAN, D.O.,

Plaintiffs/

Counterdefendants

- Appellees,

v SC: 153652

COA: 320689

Wayne CC: 08

- 014212

- CK

SHIRLEY T. SHERROD, M.D., P.C. and

SHIRLEY T. SHERROD, M.D.,

Defendants/

Counterplaintiffs/Third

- Party Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

and

GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL,

Third

- Party Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the

case of Power Play International v Reddy (Docket No. 154347) is pending on appeal

befor e this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the

present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in

ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.
Craig	Byrom

21234	Branford	Hills	Lane

Katy,	Texas	77450

512-731-4341

cbyrom1@gmail.com

Registered UAS S/N : CB14

Temporary N # NT0046692

 The aircraft be operated within a secure environment; and that 

no one be allowed to enter the secure environment unless they 

are part of the production, have been fully briefed of the risks 

prior to operation of the UAS, and have consented to the risks 

associated with being in the operating area. Should there be a 

mishap, the UAS being flown poses significantly less of a threat 

than the helicopters and fixed wing aircraft now being employed 

because they are a fraction of the size, carry no flammable fuel, 

do not carry crew or passengers, and pose an infinitely smaller

risk to others. This is in stark contrast to conventional aircraft that 

are flown to the site, carry explosive fuel, carry passengers and 

crew, and operate in a much larger area.

The safety of those on the ground is protected by the fact that no 

one will be allowed into the closed set without the permission of 

the film company. Security will be established for the flight area 

as part of the pre-flight control. Each individual within the secure 

area will be briefed prior to flight and will consent to being in the 

area. All others will be excluded from the area.

Altitude information being provided to the UAS pilot via a digitally 

encoded telemetric data feed, which downlinks from the aircraft 

to a ground-based on-screen display. This altitude information 

and GPS location will be generated by equipment installed on 

board the aircraft, using GPS triangulation or radio altimeter, or 

any combination thereof. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude and 

initiation point will be established and confirmed for accuracy by 

the pilot.
At all times while UAS is in preflight, flight and post flight, PIC 

and spotter will be in closed channel radio communication 

wearing hands free headsets.

Accompanying this additional information requesting relief is a 

Operations Manual specific to this aircraft “DJI S1000”

The Operators Manual was put together by Gene Payson and I 

was given permission for the personal use of this document to 

assist me in my relief.

Thank You

Craig Byrom
****Exhibit 34.1****

Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP 

One Towne Sq, Sre 600 

Southfield, MI 48076-3710 

Tel 248 372 7300 

Fax 248 368 8950 

Bakertilly.com 

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

To the Board of Directors of VW Credit, Inc. and 

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Indenture Trustee: 

We have examined VW Credit, Inc’s (the Company) compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation ABfor the Company’s Volkswagen Auto Lease Trust 2010-A asset backed securitization transactions except for the servicing criteria set forth in Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(ii)-(iv), 229.1122(d)(2)(vi), 229.1122(d)(4)(ix)-(xiii), and229.1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the asset backed securities transactions being serviced as of December 31, 2011 and for the period from January 1, 2011through December 31, 2011 (the “Reporting Period”). Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s compliance based on ourexamination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, VW Credit, Inc. complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned servicing criteria for the reporting period ended December 31, 2011. 

Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP 

/s/ BakerTilly Virchow Krause, LLP 

Southfield, Michigan 

March 27, 2012
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Don't be lulled into a false sense of security. having your check mailed on payday isn't always as safe as it seems

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Don't be lulled into a false sense of security. having your check mailed on payday isn't always as safe as it seems 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Veterans Administration 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. Veterans Administration 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Use direct deposit. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  151 × 36 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018859051.jpg; 018859051.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Torotel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending January 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dale H. Sizemore, Jr.,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Dale H. Sizemore, Jr. |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |
|                           |
| Dale H. Sizemore, Jr.     |
| Chief Executive Officer        |
| March 10,  2006                |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Todd Shipyards Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  November 4, 2004

 

 

/s/ Stephen G. Welch

Stephen G. Welch, 

President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 55426.

#### Novelty Veiling Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 164691-K (A) (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 41893.

#### Protest 159634-G of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Amrein*(26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) Normandy laces were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Embroidered shirts .and dresses similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Smith*(12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544) and lace window curtains similar to those the subject <of *Billwiller*v. *United States*(T. D. 44911) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Artificial flowers the same as those the subject of *Robinson-■Goodman*v. *United States*(17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) were held dutiable At 60 percent' under paragraph 1419.
Exhibt
      4.8

     

    REVOLVING
      LOAN AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
      THREE

     

    Amendment
      Date: September
      24, 2007

     

    Amended
      Credit Limit: $25,000.00                

     

    RFG
      Acquisition II Inc., a Delaware corporation, promises to pay JOHN W. BRANCH
      (“Lender”), an individual, the amended sum of TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND and 00/100
      DOLLARS ($25,000.00) (the “Amended Credit Limit”) or such other principal amount
      that may be outstanding, in no case to exceed the Amended Credit Limit, as
      evidenced by the books and records of Lender. 

     

    This
      Agreement Three hereby amends the Credit Limit as defined in the Revolving
      Loan
      Agreement, dated November 20, 2006, as amended, by and among RFG Acquisition
      II
      Inc. and John W. Branch. All other terms and conditions of the original
      Revolving Loan Agreement, dated November 20, 2006, as amended, remain unchanged
      and in full force and effect.

    


    This
      Agreement Three is effective as of the date listed above.

    


    

      
        	
                RFG
                  Acquisition II Inc.  

                 

                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              
	
                By:
                  

              	
                /s/ David
                  W. Matre

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	
              
	
                 

              	
                David
                  W. Matre

                Chief
                  Financial Officer

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	 
	
                 

              	 	
                 

              	
                 

              	 


      

       

      
        	
                “Lender”   

                 

                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              
	
                 

              	
                /s/ 
                  John W. Branch

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              
	
                 

              	
                JOHN
                  W. BRANCH, an individual

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	 
	
                 

              	 	
                 

              	
                 

              	 


      



    DO
      NOT DESTROY THIS ORIGINAL AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
# C_2009004EN.01000102.xml

| 9.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 4/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 4/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5274 — Newscorporation/Permira/NDS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 4/02)

On 19 December 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5274. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5274. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS

TEMPORARY REVISION 2B−2186

C

Aug 08/11

TR# 2B−2186

Airworthiness Requirements

Part 2 of Maintenance Requirements Manual

Appendix B − Airworthiness Limitations

Page 1 of 1

The contents of this Temporary Revision have been approved by the Chief, Engineering (or designate), National Aircraft Certification Branch, Transport

Canada Civil Aviation

Date July 25, 2011 Signed Remy Knoerr

FILING INSTRUCTIONS: Insert this Temporary Revision (TR) 2B−2186 facing page 2B−9, in Part 2 of the Maintenance Requirements Manual (MRM).

Record the incorporation of this Temporary Revision on the RECORD OF TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheet at the front of the

MRM Part 2.

Keep this Temporary Revison until normal revision service incorporates this information into the Maintenance Requirements

Manual.

DESCRIPTION: This Temporary Revision is issued to revise the NDT MANUAL REF. (from NOTE 5 to 27−40−102 Part 7), and to revise the

task DESCRIPTION (to specify upper and lower installation pins).

STRUCTURAL AIRWORTHINESS LIMITATIONS

NDT

INSPECTION INTERVAL

AWL

NUMBER

MRB TASK

REFERENCE

NDT

MANUAL DESCRIPTION INSPECT

TYPE

51000 lb MTOW 53000 lb MTOW

NUMBER REFERENCE REF.

SC O TYPE THRESHOLD

(LANDINGS)

REPEAT

(LANDINGS)

THRESHOLD

(LANDINGS)

REPEAT

(LANDINGS)

Pitch Trim Actuator

27−40−102 MSI 274001 27−40−102

Part 7

Horizontal stabilizer pitch trim actuator upper and

lower installation pins

Special

Detailed

40000 40000 40000 40000

CL 600 2B19
July 30 , 2015

Mr

. Kyle Falwell

Central Virginia Aerial Solutions, LLC

4132 Richmond Highway

Lynchburg, VA 24501

Dear Mr. Falwell :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains wh y we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your May 12 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 1450 ), but

we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does no t comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further,

you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close th e docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure