alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          68,600
<SECURITIES>                                 2,337,600
<RECEIVABLES>                                  770,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    922,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,280,700
<PP&E>                                       1,873,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                  70,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,429,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,401,400
<BONDS>                                     11,071,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          232,800
<PREFERRED>                                  1,053,000
<COMMON>                                     5,041,300
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,538,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,429,300
<SALES>                                      2,527,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,527,700
<CGS>                                        1,678,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,678,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,515,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,079,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,257,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                    49,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,198,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,198,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
Case: 2:11-cv-00233-EAS Doc #: 6 Filed: 02/27/12 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T12:25:15-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
------------- --~· ·- -- --·-~- ---.-

Writ uf M:wdamus Denied, Opinion issued September 12, 21H 2 

In The 

<!rourt of Appeals 

llfiftl~ IDistrict of UJcxas at IDallas 

No. 05-12-01226-CV 

IN RE DAVID A. SCHUM, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 330th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-05-9233-Y 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justice Morris, Richter, and Lang-Miers 

Opinion by Justice Richter 

In this original mandamus proceeding, relator contends the trial court abused its discretion 

by ordering the case transferred from Dallas County, Texas to DuPage County, Illinois. The facts 

and circumstances of the case are known to the parties and we do not recite them herein. Based on 

the record before the Court, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. 

See In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. 

Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we deny relator's 

petition for writ of mandamus. 

121226F.P05
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0235

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

SHELDON PATRICK TRACY,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until August 20, 2021, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

July 22 2021

07/22/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0235
Before the First Division,

January 8, 1941

No. 45127.

#### Petition 6118-R of J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Beown, J.

The petition was dismissed.
Exhibit 10.6 

FIRST AMENDMENTTOWARRANT NO. 025 

        ThisFirst Amendment to Warrant No. 025 (this “***Amendment*****”) isentered into effective as of August 14, 2003, (the “***EffectiveDate*****”), by and between Toreador Resources Corporation, a Delawarecorporation (the “Issuer”) and Barclays Bank PLC (the“***Holder*****” and together with the Issuer, the“***Parties*****”). 

RECITALS
    A.                 Previously, the Issuer issued Warrant No. 025 (the          “***Warrant*****”) dated as of April 14, 2003 to the          Holder. 

    B.                 Pursuant to Section 3 of the Warrant, the Warrant is exercisable commencing six          months after the Warrant Issue Date (April 14, 2003). 

    C.                 Section 14 of the Warrant permits the Parties to amend the Warrant upon the          written consent of the Holder and the Issuer. 

    D.                 The Issuer and the Holder have determined that the Warrant should be exercisable          commencing twelve months after the Warrant Issue Date (April 14, 2003). 

    E.                 Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have          the meanings given to such terms in the Warrant. 

    F.                 Based on the recitals set forth above and the promises contained herein and in          the Warrant, the Parties hereby agree that the Warrant be amended as of the          Effective Date as follows: 
AMENDMENTS
    1.       Amendmentto Section 3. Section 3 “Exercise Period” of the Warrant is replaced in its entirety to read as follows:  
 3.  ExercisePeriod. This Warrant shall be exercisable commencing twelve months after the WarrantIssue Date and shall expire and be of no further force or effect at 4:30 p.m. (Dallastime) on April 7, 2008 (the “***Expiration Date*****”).
No. 65674.

#### H. W. Ebert & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 60/25371 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From a review of the record in this case, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector. The protest was, therefore, overruled.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for COMM 2015-LC23 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of November 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

/s/ Jeffrey Coletta

Jeffrey Coletta 

Assistant Secretary

 

  

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
No. 49821.

#### Protest 90919-K of Meyer & Lange (New York).

*315Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of peeled grapes in cans, the same as that passed upon in *United States*v. *Meyer & Lange*(32 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 277). In view thereof the court held the merchandise dutiable at 25 cents per cubic foot under paragraph 742 as claimed.
No. 59173.

protest 240388-K (New York).

#### Wood, Niebuhr & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of smoked sardines, packed in oil, but neither skinned nor boned, and valued at over 18 but not over 23 cents per pound, including the weight of the immediate container, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2008253EN.01S00301.xml

| 4.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

CHARLES M. NASELSKY,

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 1888 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 169 DB 2012

Attorney Registration No. 51473

(Philadelphia)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4

th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted. 

Petitioner is ordered to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and 

processing of the Petition for Reinstatement. See Pa.R.D.E. 218(f).
Case No. 8,027.

#### LAMBERT et al. v. SMITH et al.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 347.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

July Term, 1806.

Security for Costs — .Death of Member of Partnership, Plaintiff — Rule for Costs — Continuance — Pilling Blanks in Declaration —Pleading after Knowledge of Same.

1. If the only resident member of a copartnership who are plaintiffs dies pending the suit, the defendant may demand security for costs against the surviving plaintiffs, and the court will continue the cause to give the defendants an opportunity to lay the rule and give sixty days’ notice.

2. If the blanks in the declaration have been filled up by the plaintiff at the trial-term, and the defendant pleads with a knowledge that they have been so filled up, it is not a ground for continuance of the cause.

Lambert died since the last term. Fos-dick, the surviving partner, resides out of the district. The defendants [Smith & Son] moved for a rule on the plaintiffsMEambert & Co.] to give security for costs.

''THE COURT decided that if the plaintiff did not now give the security, they would continue the cause so as to enable the defendant to give sixty days’ notice of the motion, according to the act of assembly. See Thomas v. Woodhouse [Case No. 13,917].

Mr. Swann gave the security required.

E. J. Lee, for defendant,

contended that he had a right to a continuance, because the plaintiff had filled up a blank in the declaration.

1

 [Reported by Hou. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

THE COURT said it was only ground for a motion to strike out what had been filled up.

It was then stated that defendant had pleaded non assumpsit after a knowledge that the blank had been so filled.

THE COURT said that that was a. waiver of the objection.

Mr. Lee then obtained a continuance on affidavit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TOREADOR
ROYALTY CORPORATION UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,315,971
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  242,428
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,658,472
<PP&E>                                       5,854,746
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,316,321
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,196,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          258,909
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       874,855
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,028,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,196,897
<SALES>                                      1,090,688
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,339,670
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,183,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                155,941
<INCOME-TAX>                                    52,574
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            103,367
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   103,367
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
No. 59168.

protest 238753-K (New York).

#### Allied Display Materials, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass bead Christmas tree ornaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Walco Bead Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 62, C. D. 1445), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the First Division,

August 16, 1939

No. 41941.

#### Protest 941468-G of Glaser Bros. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

McClelland, P. J.

The article was found to be a plaster-of-paris figure of a horse about 9 inches high on a base about 2 inches thick. On either side of the base in raised letters is the inscription “White Horse Whisky.” It was found that the figure of the horse taken by itself falls within the definition of a statuette and it was held the mere fact that advertising material appears on the base does not remove the article from the purview of the language under which classification was made. The protest was therefore overruled. Abstract 23727 cited. Brown, J., dissented.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 371 

Designating July 22, 2006, as ‘‘National Day of the American Cowboy’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2006 

Mr. THOMAS (for himself, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. BURNS, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. REID, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. 

SALAZAR, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. ENZI, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. ALLEN, 

Mr. ENSIGN, Mr. THUNE, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. FRIST, and Mr. CRAPO) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

APRIL 5, 2006 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 22, 2006, as ‘‘National Day of the 

American Cowboy’’. 

Whereas pioneering men and women, recognized as cowboys, 

helped establish the American West; 

Whereas that cowboy spirit continues to infuse this country 

with its solid character, sound family values, and good 

common sense; 

Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, 

compassion, respect, a strong work ethic, and patriotism; 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
2 

SRES 371 ATS

Whereas the cowboy loves, lives off of, and depends on the 

land and its creatures, and is an excellent steward, protecting and enhancing the environment; 

Whereas the cowboy continues to play a significant role in the 

culture and economy of the United States; 

Whereas approximately 800,000 ranchers are conducting 

business in all 50 States and are contributing to the economic well being of nearly every county in the Nation; 

Whereas rodeo is the sixth most-watched sport in the United 

States; 

Whereas membership in rodeo and other organizations encompassing the livelihood of a cowboy transcends race 

and sex and spans every generation; 

Whereas the cowboy is an American icon; 

Whereas to recognize the American cowboy is to acknowledge 

the ongoing commitment of the United States to an esteemed and enduring code of conduct; and 

Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys to their 

communities should be recognized and encouraged: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates July 22, 2006, as ‘‘National Day 

3 of the American Cowboy’’; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

6 activities. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



March 16, 2023



Via EDGAR



Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549



| | Re: | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Ladies and Gentlemen:



In connection with the Annual Report of VOC Energy
Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of
the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its
knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Trust.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The above certification is furnished solely pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.



| |  | THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.,
| |  | ------------------------------------------------
| |  |                                                 
| |  | Trustee for VOC Energy Trust                    
| |  |                                                 
| |  | By:                                             
| |  |                                                 
| |  |
The Honorable Cue D. Boykin, Chairman 

Texas Industrial Accident Board 

Lyndon Baines Johnson Building 

P. 0. Box 12757, Capitol Station 

Austin, Texas 78711 

Opinion No. H- 715 

Re: Whether a member of the 

Industrial Accident Board 

accumulates sick leave and vacation 

benefits. 

Dear Mr. Boykin: 

You have requested our opinion concerning whether a member of the 

Industrial Accident Board is a state employee for the purposes of vacation and 

sick leave entitlement. 

Article V, section 7 of the current appropriations act provides vacation 

and sick leave benefits to It[ e] mployees of the State . . . . ” Acts 1975. 64th 

Leg. ,ch. 743. bi Attorney General Opinion M-1280 (1972) this office ruled that a 

member of the Texas Employment Commission is a “State official” rather than an 

“annual employee” and thus the provisions of the appropriations act which related 

to sick leave and vacation were inapplicable. See also Attorney General Opinion 

M-1279 (1972). While the then current appropriations act referred to “annual 

employees of the State” whereas the present act applies to I,[ e] mployees of the 

State” we believe the ruling in M-1280 controls your question, for in our view 

a member of the Industrial Accident Board is clearly a state official rather than 

a state employee. See V. T. C. S. art. 8307, et seq. ; Aldine Independent School 

District v. StandleyT 280 S. W. 2d 578 (Tex. Sup. 1955); Attorney General Letter 

Advisory No. 85 (1974)‘.. Accordingly, in our opinion, an Industrial Accident 

Board member does not accumulate sick leave and vacation under the appropriations 

act. 

SUMMARY 

Members of the Industrial Accident Board 

do not accumulate vacation and sick leave under the appropriations act.. 

-Very truly yours, 

Attorney General of Texas 

p. 3070 
The Honorable Cue D. Boykin - page two (H-715) 

Opinion Committee 

jad: 

p. 3071
Before the Third Division,

May 31, 1945

No. 50227.

#### Protests 68397-K, etc., of Armour Leather Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# Official Journal L 253/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 253 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6530 September 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 253

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6530 September 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Decision No 1/2022 of the EU-CTC Joint Committee of 25 August 2022 as regards amending the data element requirements for transit declarations and rules on administrative assistance in Appendices I, IIIa and IV to the Convention on a common transit procedure [2022/1669] | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Decision No 1/2022 of the EU-CTC Joint Committee of 25 August 2022 as regards amending the data element requirements for transit declarations and rules on administrative assistance in Appendices I, IIIa and IV to the Convention on a common transit procedure [2022/1669]

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert D. Ravnaas, Chief Executive Officer of Kimbell Royalty GP, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 
| Date: March 27, 2017 | /s/ Robert D. Ravnaas                                                                                                                                                           |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of   Kimbell Royalty GP, LLC, the general partner of Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP

(Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----