alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 215 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 215

         Designating December 2005 as ``National Pear Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 2005

  Mr. Smith (for himself, Mr. Wyden, Mrs. Murray, Mrs. Feinstein, and 
 Mrs. Boxer) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
         Designating December 2005 as ``National Pear Month''.

Whereas pear trees imported to Oregon, Washington, and California by pioneers in 
        the 1800s thrived in the unique agricultural conditions found in the 
        Pacific States;
Whereas the Pacific States are internationally renowned for producing varieties 
        of delicious, sweet, and juicy pears;
Whereas the Pacific States form the only geographic region in the United States 
        with the ideal combination of climate and geography needed to produce 
        high-quality, delicious summer and winter pear varieties;
Whereas the rich pear-growing region stretches from the Central Valley of 
        California, through the Rogue River Valley in southern Oregon, and to 
        the banks of the Columbia River in Oregon and Washington;
Whereas pears are a high-quality source of vitamin C, potassium, and dietary 
        fiber, have no cholesterol, are low in calories, and complement an 
        active lifestyle;
Whereas Oregon, Washington, and California are world-renowned for providing 
        beautiful and delicious pears;
Whereas the United States does not have an official pear month; and
Whereas designating December 2005 as ``National Pear Month'' would be a suitable 
        recognition of the affection the people of the United States hold for 
        pears and the healthful benefits of pears: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates December 2005 as ``National Pear Month''; 
        and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the month with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and 
        consumption.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 363A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.363.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 363A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5613 December 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.363.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 363A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5613 December 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2013/C 363A/01 | Recruitment notice PE/171/S | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2013/C 363A/01

Recruitment notice PE/171/S

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 27 | (RO) |
| 29 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 36 | (DA) |
| 41 | (BG) |
| 43 | (EN) |
| 49 | (ET) |
| 50 | (HU) |
| 51 | (SL) |
| 54 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 58 | (EN/GA) |
| 75 | |
| 81 | |
| 82 | |
| 88 | (BG) |
| 89 | (CS) |
| 94 | |
| 104 | |
| 109 | |
| 111 | |
| 112 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 117 | (ET) |
| 118 | |
| 120 | |
| 131 | |
| 143 | |
| 160 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 162 | |
| 166 | |
| 167 | |
| 168 | |
| 172 | |
| 173 | |
| 174 | |
| 176 | (BG/DE/EN/ET/FI/IT/LT/LV/MT/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV) |
| 180 | (MT) |
| 182 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 183 | (IT) |
| 191 | |
| 192 | |
| 193 | |
| 194 | |
| 196 | |
| 197 | |
| 199 | |
| 200 | |
| 204 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 210 | (LV) |
| 211 | (PL) |
| 219 | |
| 227 | |
| 231 | |
| 235 | |
| 240 | |
| 264 | |
| 269 | |
| 276 | |
| 277 | |
| 279 | (PT) |
| 286 | (ET) |
| 289 | |
| 290 | |
| 292 | (SK) |
| 293 | (EN) |
| 294 | (DE) |
| 295 | (DA) |
| 299 | |
| 300 | (LT) |
| 301 | |
| 302 | |
| 308 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 309 | |
| 310 | |
| 317 | |
| 320 | |
| 321 | |
| 322 | |
| 335 | |
| 339 | |
| 346 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 347 | (GA) |
| 354 | (PT) |
| 355 | |
| 357 | |
| 361 | |
| 363 | |

5

27

(RO)

29

33

34

36

(DA)

41

(BG)

43

(EN)

49

(ET)

50

(HU)

51

(SL)

54

(DE/EN/FR)

58

(EN/GA)

75

81

82

88

(BG)

89

(CS)

94

104

109

111

112

(DE/EN/FR)

117

(ET)

118

120

131

143

160

(DE/EN/FR)

162

166

167

168

172

173

174

176

(BG/DE/EN/ET/FI/IT/LT/LV/MT/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV)

180

(MT)

182

(DE/EN/FR)

183

(IT)

191

192

193

194

196

197

199

200

204

(DE/EN/FR)

210

(LV)

211

(PL)

219

227

231

235

240

264

269

276

277

279

(PT)

286

(ET)

289

290

292

(SK)

293

(EN)

294

(DE)

295

(DA)

299

300

(LT)

301

302

308

(DE/EN/FR)

309

310

317

320

321

322

335

339

346

(DE/EN/FR)

347

(GA)

354

(PT)

355

357

361

363

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03997**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 03997\03997_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03997\03997_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03997\03997_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03997\03997_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03997\03997_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03997\03997_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03997\03997_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03997\03997_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03997\03997_PartF.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03997\03997_PartG.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03997\03997_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

03997\Certification Statement Plant ID_03997.pdf Plant certification statement x 03997\Supporting Documentation\03997_aerial.ppt Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03997\Supporting Documentation\PETE.Plant Water Balance.Units 1&2.Drawing No.008-00-6-M-F-26C.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 117 

Designating the week of May 9, 2005, as ‘‘National Hepatitis B Awareness 

Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 20, 2005 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself and Mr. SANTORUM) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of May 9, 2005, as ‘‘National Hepatitis 

B Awareness Week’’. 

Whereas hepatitis B is the most common serious liver infection in the world; 

Whereas chronic hepatitis B infections cause 80 percent of all 

primary liver cancer cases worldwide; 

Whereas 10,000,000 to 30,000,000 people will be infected 

with the hepatitis B virus worldwide in 2005; 

Whereas approximately 100,000 people in the United States 

will become infected with hepatitis B virus this year 

alone; 

Whereas fewer than 10 percent of diagnosed chronic hepatitis 

B patients in the United States are currently receiving 

treatment for their disease; 
2 

•SRES 117 IS

Whereas healthcare and work loss costs from liver disease 

and liver cancer-caused hepatitis B infections total more 

than $700,000,000 annually; 

Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

(CDC) estimates that 1,250,000 Americans are already 

infected with hepatitis B and nearly 6,000 will die of 

liver complications each year; 

Whereas a person who has become infected with hepatitis B 

may not have symptoms for up to 40 years after the initial infection has occurred, and there is currently no routine screening in place for early detection; 

Whereas the CDC has identified African-Americans, AsianAmericans, and Pacific Islanders, as well as Native 

Americans and Alaskan Natives, as having higher rates 

of hepatitis B infection in the United States; 

Whereas Asian-Americans and Pacific Islanders account for 

more than half of the chronic hepatitis B cases and half 

of the deaths resulting from chronic hepatitis B infection 

in the United States; and 

Whereas there is a need for a comprehensive public education 

and awareness campaign designed to help infected patients and their physicians identify and manage the secondary prevention of the disease and to help increase the 

length and quality of life for those diagnosed with chronic 

hepatitis B: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week of May 9, 2005, as 

3 ‘‘National Hepatitis B Awareness Week’’; 
3 

•SRES 117 IS

1 (2) calls upon the people of the United States 

2 to observe the week with appropriate programs and 

3 activities; and 

4 (3) supports raising awareness of the con5 sequences of untreated chronic hepatitis B and the 

6 urgency to seek appropriate care as a serious public 

7 health issue. 

Æ
0 

# j

I SERVED: FEBRUARY 23, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION DOCKETNO. FAA-2014-1118 (Civil Penalty Action)
ORDER OF CHIEFADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE GRANTING UNCONTESTED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT (i·'"'

By motion filed February 13,2015, 1Respondent moves to extend, through March 25, 2015, the time to answer the complaint. 2 Respondent states that Complainant has been contacted and "does not oppose a 30-day extension oftime for Federal Express Corporation to file its Answer."3 For good cause shown, Respondent's motion is granted.4 Respondent's answer to the complaintmaybe filed on or before March 25, 2015. SO ORDERED.



# . .**.-··--······i,-~}** 

# () /.

·.

### ~-<2C-:
'-
....**~**..w_, ·-**~ ,.~** ......-•• • • • A. Yoder Chief**Administrative~** dge Attachment- Service List

1FDMS DocketNo. FAA-2014-1118, Doc. No.5, Uncontested Motion to Extend Time to Answer Complaint ("Motion 5"). Unless otherwise stated, all document references are to FDMS Docket No. FAA-2014-1118, available at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketBrowser;rpp=50;so=DESC;sb=postedDate;po=O;D=FAA-2014-1 118, and all regulatory citations are to sections of 14 C.F.R. (2014). 2 Doc. No.2, Complaint. Because the complaint was served by mail on January 22, 2015, id. at 6, the answer now is due no laterthan February 26, 2015. See §§ 13.209(a) (answer or motion due "not later than 30 days after service ofthe complaint"), 13.211(e) (5 days added to period for "any response within a prescribed period after service by mail"). 3 Motion 5, supra note 1, at2. Thirty days after February 26, 2015, is Saturday, February 28, 2015. 4 § 13.213(-b).SERVICE LIST DocketNo. FAA-2014-1118 (Civil Penalty Action)

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY (VIA MAIL) Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W10005 ONE COPY (VIA MAIL, FOLLOWING CC BY FAX OR EMAIL, AS AVAILABLE) Greg G. Stofko, 

### Respondent's Counsel Legal Department F

edEx Express 1700 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 950 Washington, DC 20006 TEL: 202-393-9285 EMAIL: gregstofko@fedex.com Charles Raley, 

### Complainant's Counsel Enforcement Division, AGC-300 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 TEL: 202-267-3357 FAX: 202-267-5106 The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, 

### ChiefAdministrative LawJudge U.S. DepartmentofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2142 FAX: 202-366-7536

5 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
Before the First Division,

September 10, 1942

No. 47535.

#### Protests 67294-K, etc., of Parker Fur Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Walicer, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Theo Baldi , certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of IPOWorld;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and proceduresto be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)     designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financialreporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

c)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d)    disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.     I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and

 

b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
(Reap. Dec. 9253)

#### Filjay Imports *v.*United States

Entry No. 104529.

(Decided November 14, 1958)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

WilsoN, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the export value of the merchandise at the time of exportation to the United States covered by the Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated above at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to *579placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the entered unit value less the addition made under duress to meet the advance by the Appraiser in similar cases covering non-dutiable F.O.B. charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage, hauling and lighterage, and that the issues are similar in all material respects to the case of *Filjay Imports*v. *United States,*36 Cust. Ct. Rpts. 547, Reap. Dec. 8560.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher domestic value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal to re-appraisement enumerated above may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was the entered unit value, less the additions made under duress to meet the advances by the appraiser in similar cases covering nondutiable f. o. b. charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage, hauling, and lighterage.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
P a s s ama q u o d d y Trr ii b e

P ll e a s a n tt P o ii n tt

Trr ii b a ll L a n d s

0 0.5 1 2 3 4

Miles

Map Created by Christina Stringer

February 18 2013

Data Source Base Map Bing Maps

Trust Boundaries US 2010 Census

Fee Boundaries Passamaquoddy Tribe

Fee Land

Trust Land

EPA001406
(Reap. Dec. 9297)

#### Pan Pacific Overseas Corp. *F. L.*Kraemer & Co. et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 708353-1/3, etc.

(Decided January 20, 1959)

*Sharrells, Paley & Carter*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*447Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule were submitted for decision by counsel for the parties upon a stipulation reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise marked A and checked MG (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner Geller (Examiner’s Name) on the invoices covered by the above named appeals for reappraisement consists of birch plywood exported from Finland after May 20, 1955.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the market values or the prices at the time of exportation to the United States, of the merchandise marked A as aforesaid, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of Finland, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the appraised values less 4% and that there was no higher export value.

On the agreed facts, I find that foreign value, as defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is the proper basis of value for the merchandise marked *“A”*and checked MG by Examiner Geller on the invoices, and that the said value, in each instance, was the appraised value, less 4 per centum.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
### The Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrat e 1 

### Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, presiding by con sent of the parties. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). ___________ No. 95-3534

___________ Donald G. Tucker, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Shirley S. Chater, * Eastern District of Arkansas Commissioner, Social Security * Administration, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 8, 1996 Filed: April 29, 1996

___________ Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.

Dona ld G. Tucker filed applications with the Social Securit y Administration seeking Title II Disability Insurance Benefits and Title XV I Supplement Security Income pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. The Social Securi ty Administration denied his applications at each stage of th e administrative proces s. After Tucker exhausted all of his administrative remedies, he sought judicial review in federal district court. Th e district court granted the Commissi oner's motion for summary judgment and 1 denied that of Tucker. On appeal Tucker argues that the administrative la w judge improperly discredited his subjective comp laints of pain and did not consider his speech problems, erred in posing the hypothetical

### -2-

question to the vocational expert, and failed to credit the testimony of his treating physician. He asserts that there i s not substantial evidence to support the Commissioner's decision to deny him benefits. Afte r carefully reviewing the record and considering t he arguments raised orally and in wri ting, we conclude that there is substantial evidence in th e record as a whole to support the Commissioner's decision. The judgment in favor of the Commissioner is affirmed on the bas is of the district court's opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

LOWELL L. JONES, CASE NO. 2:12-CV-00150 

 JUDGE MARBLEY 

Petitioner, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers 

v. 

WARDEN, PICKAWAY 

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 

Respondent. 

OPINION AND ORDER 

On November 26, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation

recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

be dismissed. Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge’s 

Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have 

been filed. 

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby 

DISMISSED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Algenon L. Marbley 

 ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 United States District Judge 

Case: 2:12-cv-00150-ALM-EPD Doc #: 10 Filed: 01/15/14 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>