alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 91/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 91 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 597 April 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 91

English edition

Legislation

Volume 597 April 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/539 of 6 April 2016 amending Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 as regards pilot training, testing and periodic checking for performance-based navigation (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/540 of 6 April 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 16 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2016/541 of 19 August 2015 giving notice to Greece to take measures for the deficit reduction judged necessary to remedy the situation of excessive deficit (2015/1410) | 18 |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/542 of 17 July 2015 on granting short-term Union financial assistance to Greece (2015/1181) | 22 |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/543 of 17 July 2015 approving the adjustment programme of Greece (2015/1182) | 26 |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/544 of 19 August 2015 approving the macroeconomic adjustment programme of Greece (2015/1411) | 27 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/539 of 6 April 2016 amending Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 as regards pilot training, testing and periodic checking for performance-based navigation (
  1
  )

1

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/540 of 6 April 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

16

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2016/541 of 19 August 2015 giving notice to Greece to take measures for the deficit reduction judged necessary to remedy the situation of excessive deficit (2015/1410)

18

*

Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/542 of 17 July 2015 on granting short-term Union financial assistance to Greece (2015/1181)

22

*

Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/543 of 17 July 2015 approving the adjustment programme of Greece (2015/1182)

26

*

Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/544 of 19 August 2015 approving the macroeconomic adjustment programme of Greece (2015/1411)

27

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In Connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Properties Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stanley
J. Weber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Stanley J. Weber
--------------------
Stanley J. Weber
Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2005


                                       29
Order entered November 4 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00651
- CV
RUTH TORRES , Appellant

V. UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW COMMITTEE FOR THE

SUPREME COURT O F TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 20
- 07071

O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s November 2, 2021 second motion for extension of time to file her brief and withdrawal of her November 1, 2021 motion for contempt

. Appellant explains the extension is necessary because a supplemental clerk’s record she requested has not yet been filed. Appellee has filed a response opposing the extension and noting that the documents appellant
h as requested be included in the supplemental clerk’s record were f iled in a different trial court ca u se and were not made part of the trial record in this case.Attached to appellee’s response is a copy of appellant’s supplemental record

request

. We have reviewed the supplemental record request . As recited there , the documents appellant seeks to have included in the record were “ removed from public view” by order of the trial judge in that case. To the extent appellant seeks
an extension to file her brie f so the record can be supplemented with documents from another trial court ca u se that (1) appear to be sealed or to which ac cess is otherwise restricted and (2) were not made a part of the trial record in this case , we DENY the November 2nd motion

. We GR ANT the November 2 nd motion to the extent it concerns appellant’s contempt motion and ORDER th at motion WITHDRAWN

. On our own motion, we ORDER appellant’s brief, which was due October 28, 2021, b e filed no later than November 15, 2021.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre and the parties.
/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
# Official Journal C 14A/16 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 14A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6616 January 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 14A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6616 January 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | General Court |
| 2023/C 14 A/01 | Call for applications | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

General Court

2023/C 14 A/01

Call for applications

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-QSB  of  Regency
Affiliates, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Neil N. Hasson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
      material respects,  the consolidated financial condition of the Company as
      of the dates  presented and the  consolidated  result of operations of the
      Company for the periods presented.

Dated: May 26, 2006


/s/ Neil N. Hasson
--------------------------------------
Neil N. Hasson
Chief Financial Officer
Phantom Pre

- Flight Check List

Earth Forensics, Inc. 12532 Vista Panorama, North Tustin, California 92705 www. ea rth f or ens i cs . c om 

### Project Information

Date: Project: Weather:

PIC: Location: Visibility:

VO:

Flight Time Start

Flight Time End:



### Flight Plan (Office)

Check Flight Plan on Topo

Airport not <5NM

Check Google Street View and Pictometry birds eye view photography for possible obstructions

Check weather forecast

Battery for UAS fully charged

Battery for Communication system between PIC and VO fully charged

Firmware up to date



### Preflight

No People or animals close by

No Adverse Weather (wind, rain, snow)

No power lines or large buildings

Inspect propellers, gimbal, camera, landing gear, and remote control

Remove lens cap and gimbal clamp

Check remote control, Wi

- Fi extender, phantom, prop guards, and mobile device power

Calibrate compass.

GPS signal (minimum 7)

Observer in place



### N otes
Exhibit (31)-2**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Richard D. Rodekohr, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Transcontinental Gas Pipe LineCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 6, 2006       By: /s/ Richard D. Rodekohr         Richard D. Rodekohr    Vice President and Treasurer    (Principal Financial Officer)
June 26, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KINGWOOD HOME HEALTH CARE, L.L.C. D/B/A HEALTH SOLUTIONS HOME

HEALTH, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00368-CV V.

AMEDISYS INC. D/B/A/ AMEDISYS TEXAS, LTD., Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, signed February 2, 

2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find 

error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED

and REMAND the cause for proceedings in accordance with the court’s opinion.

We order appellee to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this 

decision certified below for observance.
Case: 2:12-cv-01190-EAS-EPD Doc #: 58 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T09:22:32-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
SCAD-20-0000436 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
IN RE: D. GERALD FALLS (Disabled), Bar No. 4088

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC Case No. 16-O-073)

ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Intermediate Court of Appeals Associate Judge Hiraoka,

assigned by reason of vacancy) Upon consideration of the March 11, 2021 motion filed by Bradley Tamm, Chief Disciplinary Counsel at the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, for discharge as Trustee over the legal practice of attorney D. Gerald Falls due to incapacity, as provided by Rule 2.20 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai# i, and the record in this matter, we conclude that the funds in the client trust account maintained at Hawaii National Bank, ending in x3326, have successfully escheated to the State, pursuant to Hawai # i Revised Statutes Ch. 523A (2008), and that nothing further remains for Trustee Tamm to do with regards to this trusteeship. Therefore, Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-20-0000436 15-MAR-2021 08:12 AM Dkt. 8 ORDIT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted and

Tamm is discharged as Trustee in this matter. The clerk of the court shall close these proceedings.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, March 15, 2021. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

2
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 254 

Marking the dedication of the Gaylord Nelson Wilderness within the Apostle 

Islands National Lakeshore. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2005 

Mr. FEINGOLD (for himself and Mr. KOHL) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Marking the dedication of the Gaylord Nelson Wilderness 

within the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore. 

Whereas the Honorable Gaylord Nelson, a State Senator, 

Governor, and United States Senator from Wisconsin, devoted his life to protecting the environment by championing issues of land protection, wildlife habitat, environmental health, and increased environmental awareness, including founding Earth Day; 

Whereas the Honorable Gaylord Nelson authored the Apostle 

Islands National Lakeshore Act, which led to the protection of one of the most beautiful areas in Wisconsin and 

recognized the rich assemblage of natural resources, cultural heritage, and scenic features on Wisconsin’s north 

coast and 21 islands of the 22-island archipelago; 
2 

•SRES 254 IS

Whereas the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore was designated a National Park on September 26, 1970; 

Whereas, on December 8, 2004, approximately 80 percent of 

the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore was designated 

the Gaylord Nelson Wilderness; 

Whereas the Gaylord Nelson Wilderness within the Apostle 

Islands National Lakeshore provides a refuge for many 

species of birds, including threatened bald eagles and endangered piping plovers, herring-billed gulls, doublecrested cormorants, and great blue herons, and is a safe 

haven for a variety of amphibians, such as blue-spotted 

salamanders, red-backed salamanders, gray treefrogs, 

and mink frogs, and is a sanctuary for several mammals, 

including river otters, black bears, snowshoe hares, and 

fishers; 

Whereas the official dedication of the Gaylord Nelson Wilderness occurred on August 8, 2005, 36 days after the Honorable Gaylord Nelson’s passing; and 

Whereas the Honorable Gaylord Nelson changed the consciousness of our Nation and embodied the principle that 

1 person can change the world, and the creation of the 

Gaylord Nelson Wilderness is a small, but fitting, recognition of his efforts: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the Honorable Gaylord Nelson’s 

3 environmental legacy; 

4 (2) celebrates the dedication of the Gaylord 

5 Nelson Wilderness within the Apostle Islands Na6 tional Lakeshore; and 
3 

•SRES 254 IS

1 (3) requests that the Secretary of the Senate 

2 transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to the 

3 family of the Senator. 

Æ
Case No. 8,570.

#### LOWELL MANUF’G CO. v. LARNED.

[Codd. Dig. 341; Cox. Manual Trade-Mark Cas. 241.]

Circuit Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

1873.

Trade-Marks — Hollow Wooden Stick foit Carpet Rolls.

[The plaintiffs, manufacturers of carpets, had adopted and used for a long while as a trademark an octagonal, hollow, wooden stick, upon which their carpets were rolled. When so rolled, the stick presented at its ends the appearance of two octagonal wooden rings. This stick had become well known in trade as indicating carpets manufactured by the plaintiffs. *Held,*that this stick was a valid trade-mark, for ••an unauthorized use of which the defendant was liable in damages, and to an injunction to restrain future use.]

The plaintiffs, since 1855, had 'rolled their •carpets upon a hollow stick, which stick, when put into the centre of their rolls of carpet, they claimed to be their trade-mark. The -stick consisted of two pieces, ground on the iDSide. so that when the two pieces were put together they formed a shell with a rectangular opening, and with the corners of the outside rounded off, so that the ends of the stick or shell formed an octagonal ring. This ring was both visible and tangible in ■each end of each roll of carpet. The stick ■or shell was made the length of the rolls of ■carpet, so as to exhibit the rings. The shell was adopted in 1855. and used continuously ever since, by plaintiffs, as a trade-mark, and was registered as a trade-mark in the U. S. patent office in 1S71. The defendants, in 1872, commenced to make and sell carpets rolled upon sticks resembling the sticks used by the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs filed a bill ■to enjoin the defendants from the use by them of such sticks for carpets. The evidence in the case showed that such sticks in rolls •of carpet indicated to the public that the goods containing them were made by the plaintiffs; that any one seeing the shells in carpets would suppose them to be the plaintiffs’ goods; and that the use by the defendants of said sticks would deceive the public.

HELD

BY THE COURT:

That said stick, as claimed by the plaintiffs, was a good and valid trade-mark; that they were entitled to its exclusive use; and that the defendants should be enjoined, and pay to the plaintiff's the profits and gains received by them in consequence of their infringement, together with such damages as plaintiffs had suffered thereby.
**
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGEACT OF 1934,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

I, Gary S. Gillheeney, Sr., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Organogenesis Holdings Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [omitted]; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: April 30, 2019 

 
/s/ Gary S. Gillheeney, Sr.Gary S. Gillheeney, Sr.
*Chief Executive Officer*

*(PrincipalExecutive Officer)*
**
(Reap. Dec. 8886)

Entry No. 727434.

#### Lep Transport, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided June 25, 1957)

*Eugene B. Pickrell*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto that the merchandise covered by the above mentioned appeal for reappraisement consists of Copyrapid Developing Powder imported from Germany, and that said merchandise was appraised on a United States Value, as defined under the provisions of Section 402 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, at $0.43 per 8 oz. package.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the date of the exportation of the merchandise here involved, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption in Germany and that there was no foreign value or export value as defined in Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the correct United States Value for said Copyrapid Developing Powder, as defined in Section 402 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, was $0.3297 per 8 oz. package.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal is abandoned as to any other merchandise listed on the invoice, and that this appeal may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the United States value, as that value is defined in section 402 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the copyrapid developing powder here involved, and that such value was $0.3297 per 8-ounce package.

The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it refers to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.