alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 167 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 167

   Recognizing the importance of sun safety, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 9, 2005

    Mr. McCain (for himself and Mr. Sununu) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing the importance of sun safety, and for other purposes.

Whereas Americans of all ages cherish the pleasures of outdoor activities, and 
        too few recognize that overexposure to the sun and its ultraviolet 
        radiation, classified by the Department of Health and Human Services as 
        a known carcinogen, is the leading cause of skin cancer;
Whereas it is critically important to be safe in the sun because skin cancer is 
        the fastest growing cancer in our country today, affecting 1 in 5 
        Americans during their lifetimes and killing 1 person every hour of 
        every day;
Whereas more than 1,000,000 new cases of skin cancer will be diagnosed in the 
        United States this year, accounting for nearly half of all new cases of 
        cancer and exceeding the incidence of breast, prostate, lung, and colon 
        cancer combined;
Whereas most people receive approximately 80 percent of their lifetime sun 
        exposure by age 18, setting the stage for skin cancer later in life;
Whereas skin cancer is highly preventable by taking simple precautions when 
        engaged in outdoor activities;
Whereas research demonstrates that practicing good sun safety has the potential 
        to significantly reduce the risk of skin cancer;
Whereas the Sun Safety Alliance and its members have dedicated themselves to 
        promoting sun safety, eliminating skin cancer from excessive sun 
        exposure, and encouraging sun protection practices, especially among 
        children; and
Whereas the Sun Safety Alliance has designated the week of June 5, 2005, to June 
        11, 2005, as National Sun Safety Week: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes
                    (A) the importance of sun safety; and
                    (B) the need for school-based sun safety education 
                programs;
            (2) encourages all Americans to protect themselves and 
        their children from the dangers of excessive sun exposure;
            (3) congratulates the Sun Safety Alliance for its efforts 
        to promote sun safety and prevent skin cancer; and
            (4) supports the goals and ideas of National Sun Safety 
        Week.
                                 <all>
```
The Honorable Donald D. Alsop, United States District Judge for the District 1 of Minnesota. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2966

___________ Dean Russell Clark, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Harold F. Synstelien, Administrative * District of Minnesota. Staff, State of Minnesota Board of * Electricity, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 2, 1997 Filed: December 16, 1997

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Dean Russell Clark appeals from the adverse grant of summary judgment by the Distri ctCourt in his action alleging racial discrimination under Title VII, 42 U.S.C .

1 § 200 0e-2(a) (1994), and disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § § 12101-12213 (1994). After carefully reviewing-2-

the record, we affirm the District Court & s judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Appellee & s motion to dismiss the appeal is denied as moot. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 12

<TABLE>


                               TRANSAMERICA FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<CAPTION>


                                                                Six Months Ended June 30,
                                                                 1999              1998
                                                              (Dollar amounts in millions)
<S>                                                              <C>                <C>


Fixed charges:
         Interest and debt expense                            $  219.1           $  188.3
         One-third of rental expense                              11.9               12.5
                                                              --------           --------

Total                                                         $  231.0           $  200.8
                                                              ========           ========

Earnings:
         Net income                                           $   69.1           $   64.2
         Provision for income taxes                               44.9               39.0
         Fixed charges                                           231.0              200.8
                                                              --------           --------

         Total                                                $  345.0           $  304.0
                                                              ========           ========


Consolidated ratio of earnings
      to fixed charges                                            1.49               1.51
                                                                  ====               ====


</TABLE>
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 1 

Informing the President of the United States that a quorum of each House 

is assembled. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2005 

Mr. FRIST (for himself and Mr. REID) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION

Informing the President of the United States that a quorum 

of each House is assembled.

1 Resolved, That a committee consisting of two Sen2 ators be appointed to join such committee as may be ap3 pointed by the House of Representatives to wait upon the 

4 President of the United States and inform him that a 

5 quorum of each House is assembled and that the Congress 

6 is ready to receive any communication he may be pleased 

7 to make.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Todd Shipyards Corporation ("we", "us", "our") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 27, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) 	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of our operations.

 

Date: February 4, 2010

 

/s/ Stephen G. Welch

Stephen G. Welch, 

President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 48664.

#### Protests 629082-G, etc., of Frank M. Modica et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese in question is similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 42146. The protests were therefore sustained.
# C_2008202EN.01001601.xml

| 8.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/16

---

Latest publication of COM documents other than legislative proposals and legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

(2008/C 202/07)

OJ C 196 of 2.8.2008

OJ C 196 of 2.8.2008

History of previous publications:

OJ C 194 of 31.7.2008

OJ C 188 of 25.7.2008

OJ C 118 of 15.5.2008

OJ C 106 of 26.4.2008

OJ C 55 of 28.2.2008

OJ C 9 of 15.1.2008

---
# C_2009014EN.01000301.xml

| 21.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5332 — Ericsson/STM/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 14/05)

On 25 November 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5332. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5332. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                          TRANSTECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

               STATEMENT OF THE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      IN ACCORDANCE WITH INSTRUCTION 4(g)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                ------------------------------
                                JUNE 29, 1997    JUNE 30, 1997
                                -------------    -------------
<S>                              <C>              <C>
    Primary earnings per share:

Weighted average number of
 common shares outstanding        5,027,829        5,103,635

Dilutive effect of stock
 option plan                        158,589            - (a)
                                 ----------       ----------
                                  5,186,418        5,103,635
                                 ==========       ==========


Net income                       $2,265,000       $1,828,000
                                 ==========       ==========


Primary earnings per share       $     0.44       $     0.36
                                 ==========       ==========
</TABLE>



(a)      The inclusion of stock options in the calculation of primary earnings
         per share was either anti-dilutive or not material as per APB 15.



                                       17
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-1004 Directorate Identifier: 2013-NE-34-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Prorated Life 

Assessment

(SP3474EN-E)

0.0 $ 0.00 $15,940 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): N/A
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
No. 49325.

#### Protests 874386-G, etc., of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *Bullocks*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 110, C. D. 441) the merchandise in question was held not subject to countervailing duty.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 28, 2015

d0720

Order 

Clerk

July 28, 2015

149597(53)

JOHN BIUNDO, as Personal Representative of the

Estate of REITHA M. BIUNDO, Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 149597

COA: 313569

Wayne CC: 10-011810-NH

SURJIT S. MAHAL, M.D.,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 3, 

2015 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
Case: 2:12-cv-00625-JLG-TPK Doc #: 6 Filed: 08/31/12 Page: 1 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00625-JLG-TPK Doc #: 6 Filed: 08/31/12 Page: 2 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00625-JLG-TPK Doc #: 6 Filed: 08/31/12 Page: 3 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00625-JLG-TPK Doc #: 6 Filed: 08/31/12 Page: 4 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00625-JLG-TPK Doc #: 6 Filed: 08/31/12 Page: 5 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T16:24:28-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
# Official Journal L 123/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 123 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6210 May 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 123

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6210 May 2019

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2019/711 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 as regards the resources for the specific allocation for the Youth Employment Initiative | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2019/712 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on safeguarding competition in air transport, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 868/2004 | 4 |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Directive (EU) 2019/713 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on combating fraud and counterfeiting of non-cash means of payment and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/413/JHA | 18 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2019/711 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 as regards the resources for the specific allocation for the Youth Employment Initiative

1

*

Regulation (EU) 2019/712 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on safeguarding competition in air transport, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 868/2004

4

DIRECTIVES

*

Directive (EU) 2019/713 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on combating fraud and counterfeiting of non-cash means of payment and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/413/JHA

18

| | | II   Non-legislative acts |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/714 of 7 March 2019 replacing Annex I and amending Annexes II and VII to Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the citizens' initiative | 30 |

II   Non-legislative acts

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/714 of 7 March 2019 replacing Annex I and amending Annexes II and VII to Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the citizens' initiative

30

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Case: 2:12-cv-00739-EAS-NMK Doc #: 21 Filed: 11/29/12 Page: 1 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00739-EAS-NMK Doc #: 21 Filed: 11/29/12 Page: 2 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00739-EAS-NMK Doc #: 21 Filed: 11/29/12 Page: 3 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00739-EAS-NMK Doc #: 21 Filed: 11/29/12 Page: 4 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00739-EAS-NMK Doc #: 21 Filed: 11/29/12 Page: 5 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00739-EAS-NMK Doc #: 21 Filed: 11/29/12 Page: 6 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T20:29:08-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
(Reap. Dec. 8912)

Entry No. 755547.

#### J. B. Henriques, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided July 10, 1957)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

WilsoN, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the export value of the vinyl alcohol at the time of exportation to the United States covered by the Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated above at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was £0.1.8% per pound net weight packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher domestic value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Reap-praisement enumerated above may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was £0.1.8% (English currency) per pound, net weight, packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 55418.

#### Schwabach Co. *v.*United States,

protest 135720-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the “rugs are not kelims, that they are not made on power driven looms but are hand made in the same way as are oriental rugs.”. The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
|     |                                                                                                                            |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. |

|                        |
|------------------------|
|                        |  |  |  |  |
| Date: October 29, 2012 |   | By: |   | /s/ James W. Griffith |
|                   |   | Name: |   | James W. Griffith |
|                   |   | Title: |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                   |   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |
|                   |   |   |   |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
|   |   | By: |   | /s/ Glenn A. Eisenberg |
|   |   | Name: |   | Glenn A. Eisenberg |
|   |   | Title: |   | Executive Vice President - Finance and Administration |
|   |   |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |
|   |   |   |   |   |
Before the Third Division,

November 17, 1949

No. 53727.

petition 6718-R (Seattle).

#### J. T. Steeb & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial petitioner’s customs broker testified that he had prepared the entry and amended entry; that he had discussed the amendment with the customs examiner; that the original invoice did not contain an item for packing and it was not noticed by the broker nor the examiner; that it was again overlooked at the time the amendment was made; that when the oversight was discovered by the examiner it was too late to reamend as the merchandise had been appraised. On the record presented it was held that the petitioner, in making the entry in this ease, acted without intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise.