alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: steam_record <steam_record@erg.com>, <Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov> Date: 9/29/2010 2:36 PM Subject: Fw: EPA Questionaire for the Stea m Electric Power - Lamar, CO

----- Forwarded by Jezebele Alicea/ DC/USEPA/US on 09/29/2010 02:35 PM

----- From: Jillian Tinnes <jillian.tinnes@lamarlp.com>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Virgil Cochran <virgil.cochran@lamarlp.com>

Date: 09/29/2010 11:32 AM

Subject: EPA Questionaire for the Steam Electric Power - Lamar, CO

Dear Jezebele,

My name is Jillian Tinnes, I am the Administrative Supervisor for the City of Lamar Power Plant. I have been compiling information for the Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating. Though we are aware that the Questionnaire is required to be returned to your division within 90 days of receipt, we are not able to complete all the sections at this time.

Some of the information required is currently being compiled by an outside company who is contracted to haul the ash from our facilities. We are in contact with this compan y and they anticipate providing us with information regarding the ash, which is a large portion of section C, within the next two weeks. Also, a newly appointed Plant Supervisor has just begun to look at the portion of the questionnaire that pertains to his operation. He has requested some additional time to review and provide his answers.

Considering both these positions, I would like to request an extension to provide a completed questionnaire by October 18, 2010. I am confident that all questions will be answered most accurately provided that we obtain some time to compile them.

Thank you for your consideration,

Jillian Tinnes jillian.tinnes@lamarlp.com Administrative Services Supervisor Lamar Light and Power
# C_2008307EN.01000402.xml

| 2.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 307/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 307/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5005 — Galp Energia/ExxonMobil Iberia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 307/04)

On 31 October 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5005. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5005. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Toreador Resources Corporation;(2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;(3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operation and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;(4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     (5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: November 9, 2007/s/ Nigel J. Lovett
 Nigel
J. LovettPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
U.S. Department of 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Transportation GENERAL COUNSEL Washington, DC 20590

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

49 CFR §37.42(b) DECEMBER 14, 2011

QUESTION:

WHERE THE TRACK ADJACENT TO A PLATFORM IS NOT SHARED WITH 

FREIGHT, ARE THERE ANY CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH AN APPROACH 

OTHER THAN LEVEL BOARDING IS ALLOWABLE?

ANSWER:

• There may be some situations where level boarding is not physically feasible (e.g., where 

the curvature of the track is too great to make level boarding workable).

• A railroad operator facing a potential situation of this kind should consult with FRA or 

FTA, as appropriate.

• If FRA or FTA agrees that level boarding is not physically feasible, then the railroad 

would meet the performance standard of section 37.42(a) at the station through the means 

and process provided in section 37.42 (c) – (d). 

• However, the fact that other stations on a line do not provide level boarding is not a 

justification for failing to meet the level boarding requirement of section 37.42(b) at any 

particular station at which the rule applies. The Department views compliance with the 

requirements of the rule on a station-by-station basis.

The General Counsel of the Department of Transportation has reviewed this document 

and approved it as consistent with the language and intent of 49 CFR Part 37.
# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE 14TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 27 th day of March, 2018 , the cause on appeal to revise or reverse the judgment between

STEVEN S. SIMS, Appellant

No. 05

- 16

- 00984

- CV V.

ROSALINE D. SIMS, Appellee On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District
Court, D allas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 16

- 03445. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang

- Miers, Justices Fillmore and Stoddart participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED

.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and execute d.

WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with

the Seal the reof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 6th day of June, 2018. 

# 5 L M

LISA MATZ, Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 30 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 30

 Providing for the appointment of Phillip Frost as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 2006

  Mr. Cochran (for himself, Mr. Frist, and Mr. Leahy) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for the appointment of Phillip Frost as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the 
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other 
than Members of Congress, resulting from the retirement of Manuel L. 
Ibanez, is filled by the appointment of Phillip Frost of Miami Beach, 
Florida. The appointment is for a term of 6 years, beginning upon the 
date of enactment of this joint resolution.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2008290EN.01000601.xml

| 13.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 290/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 290/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 November 2008

(2008/C 290/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2530 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,81 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4458 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82310 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1065 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4868 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 202,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,7825 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,415 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 271,00 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7091 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7658 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,8563 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,495 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0601 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,8992 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5193 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7119 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1801 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8890 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 712,85 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,0813 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5574 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,1500 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 472,15 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5014 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,200 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,4759 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,824 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,8484 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3517 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2530

JPY

Japanese yen

121,81

DKK

Danish krone

7,4458

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82310

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1065

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4868

ISK

Iceland króna

202,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,7825

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,415

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

271,00

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7091

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7658

RON

Romanian leu

3,8563

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,495

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0601

AUD

Australian dollar

1,8992

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5193

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7119

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1801

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8890

KRW

South Korean won

1 712,85

ZAR

South African rand

13,0813

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5574

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,1500

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 472,15

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5014

PHP

Philippine peso

61,200

RUB

Russian rouble

34,4759

THB

Thai baht

43,824

BRL

Brazilian real

2,8484

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3517

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DALLAS SEYMOUR,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 1623

[ January 7, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Tim Bailey , Judge; L.T. Case No. 13

- 9529CF10A

.

Dallas Seymour, Panama City, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul Patti III,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., G ERBER and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 46311.

#### Protest 50158-K/90053 of H. J. Mayer & Sons Co. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of ginger root, not preserved or candied, unground, the same as that the subject of *Wilson*v. *United States*(28 C. C. P. A. 63, C. A. D. 126). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1768 was therefore sustained.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the annual report of Innocoll
Holdings plc (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officer’s
knowledge:



1.  The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Anthony P. Zook            | 
|------------------------------ | 
|Name: Anthony P. Zook          | 
|Title: Chief Executive Officer | 
|Date: April 19, 2017           | 



|/s/ Jose Carmona               | 
|------------------------------ | 
|Name: Jose Carmona             | 
|Title: Chief Financial Officer | 
|Date: April 19, 2017           |
No. 47536.

#### Protests 849663-G, etc., of Harrison Bros. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-20656

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DOMINGO GUERRA ESPINOZA, also known as Domingo Espinoza, also

known as Domingo Espinoza Guerra, also known as Domingo EspinozaGuerra, also known as Miguel A. Espinoza, also known as Domingo Espinosa, 

also known as Domingo G. Espinoza, also known as Mingo Guerra,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-318-1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Domingo Guerra Espinoza has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Guerra Espinoza has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 4, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-20656 Document: 00512825320 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2014
No. 13-20656

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-20656 Document: 00512825320 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/04/2014
(logo) DIXON HUGHES GOODMANLLP

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Managers ofC-III Capital Partners LLC, the 

Sole Member of C-III AssetManagement LLC:

 

We have examined management’sassertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment ofCompliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that C-III AssetManagement LLC (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forthin Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forall transactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving first liencommercial mortgage loans (the “Platform”) as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2016, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(ii),1122(d)(3)(1) – 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix)and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to theactivities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Management isresponsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on the assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards established by the American Instituteof Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on atest basis, evidence supporting management’s assertion and performing suchother procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believethat our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

 

In our opinion, management’s assertionthat the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteriaas of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 is fairly stated, in allmaterial aspects.

 

 

/s/ Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP

 

Asheville, North Carolina

February 6, 2017
Before the Third Division,

June 3, 1958

No. 62037.

#### Morganite, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 317313-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carbon powder similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Morganite, Inc.*v. *United States*(42 C. C. P. A. 207, C. A. D. 595), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
ipii_ex479.htm

EXHIBIT 4.79
  
 Extension of Debenture Maturity Date
  
 TO Intellipharmaceutics International Inc. (the "Company")
  
 RE: Debenture dated November 15, 2019, for a face amount of US $250,000 issued by the Company to Isa Odidi and Amina Odidi (the "Debenture") and the Maturity Date (as defined in the Debenture and as extended from time to time) of such Debenture
  
 The undersigned hereby agree that the current Maturity Date of the Debenture (currently December 31, 2020) is extended to May 31, 2021. 
  
 DATED as of December 31,2020.
   
 	/s/ Isa Odidi 	 	 	/s/ Amina Odidi	 
	Isa Odidi  	 	 	Amina Odidi
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer**


**pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted**


**pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002** ****




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NYFIX, Inc. for the
      quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Steven R. Vigliotti, as Chief
      Financial Officer of NYFIX, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to the best of his knowledge the Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NYFIX,
      Inc.





Dated:
      August 11, 2008





By:
            /S/
                Steven R. VigliottiSteven
              R. VigliottiChief
              Financial Officer
#### Jabez C. Woodman, Jr., *versus*Silas H. Churchill.

The deposition of a person, taken while he is under sentence of death, having been convicted 'of murder, is made legal testimony by c. 53 of the laws of 1861, which provides that “ no person shall be incompetent-to testify in *consequence*of having been convicted of any criminal offence.”

Where a party attempted to impeach the character of a witness for truth, and it appeared that the witness had lived many years in a certain town, the other party was allowed to inquire of witnesses introduced to sustain his character — “.what is his general character for truth *in that town?”*— *It was held,*that the form of the question, in respect to reputation and *locality,*must depend on the testimony in regard to the position and business of the witness.

Exceptions from the ruling of Cutting, J.

*Vinton & Dennett,*in support of exceptions.

*J. C. Woodman, contra.*

The questions presented by the exceptions will fully appear from the opinion of the Court, which was drawn up by

Davis, J.

By c. 53 of the laws of 1861, it is provided that " no person shall be incompetent to testify in any court, *113or .proceeding at law, *in consequence*of having been convicted of any criminal offence.”

Groorgo Knight was convicted of murder in the first degree 5 and, while under sentence of death therefor, his deposition was taken by the defendant, to be used in the ease at bar. This was one mode of testifying in -the case. The question would not seem to require any argument. He was clearly within the terms of the statute. And, whether his mcompetcncy, before the statute, arose from "infamy” or "civil death,” or both, each of these was a *"consequence*of having been convicted.” The statute therefore prevented either of them from rendering him " incompetent to testify.” His deposition was properly admitted.

The reputation of Isaac Knight, another witness, having been attacked, the plaintiff had the right to sustain him. Knight having been proved to have lived in Poland for many years, a witness was asked, — "what is his general reputation for truth *in Poland 9”*

The question in such cases should be a general one, upon the examination in chief, not only in regard to the *reputation,*but in regard to *locality.*At would not be proper to restrict it to a small space, nor to a few persons. Nor, on the other hand, should the question be broader than the reputation. The extent of this differs in different persons. The form of the question in this respect must depend on the testimony in regard to the position or business of the person whose character is attacked. Under the circumstances proved in this case, the question is not materially different from the usual form, "among his neighbors,” or, "where he is known,” or, "in the place where he resides.” It was for the excepting party to make it appear that the place to which the question was limited was too large, or too small, or not the right place, to make it a fair test of the general reputation. As this does not appear, the exceptions must be overruled.

Appleton, C. J., Kent, Walton and Dickerson, JJ., concurred.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Alfonso Alonzo Rodriguez, * From the 238th District Court

of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CR42299.

Vs. No. 11-14-00340-CR * December 22, 2016

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.