alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Defendant Metso Minerals Industries, Inc.’s Notice of Appeal Page 1 CAUSE NO. 12 -09-27789- MCVAJA

MAVERICK AGGREGATES, INC., § IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, § § 365th JUDICIAL DISTRICT

v. § § IPE AGGREGATE, LLC, § METSO MINERALS INDUSTRIES, INC. § and CRISP INDUSTRIES, INC., §

Defendants. § MAVERICK COUNTY, TEXAS

DEFENDANT METSO MINERALS INDUSTRIES, INC.’S

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Defendant, Metso Minerals Industries, Inc. (“Metso”) , desires to appeal, and gives notice

of its appeal, from the interlocutory order entitled “Order Denying Application to Compel

Arbitration of Metso Minerals Industries, Inc.,” which the trial court signed on August 25, 2015

in Cause No. 12-09-27789- MCVAJA

, Maverick Aggregates, Inc. v. IPE Aggregate, LLC, Metso

Minerals Industries, Inc. and Crisp Industries, Inc. , 365th Judicial District Court of Maverick

County, Texas, and which denies Metso’s request to require Plaintiff, Maverick Aggregates, Inc.,

to arb itrate its claims

.

In accordance with Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 51.016 and Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure, Rule s 25.1 and 28.1, this is an accelerated interlocutory appeal, as allowed

by statute

. Cf. T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE § 171.098. Defendant Metso Minerals Industries,

Inc. appeals to the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio, Texas.

Respectfully submitted,

L ANGLEY & B ANACK

, I NC

.

By: /s/ Catherine M. Stone

CATHERINE M. STONE

State Bar No. 19286000

c stone@langleybanack.com HERIBERTO MORALES, JR.

State Bar No. 24011285 hmorales@langleybanack.com 04-15-00532-CV ACCEPTED
04-15-00532-CV
FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
8/26/2015 4:04:02 PM
KEITH HOTTLE
CLERKDefendant Metso Minerals Industries, Inc.’s Notice of Appeal Page 2 PAULA C. BOSTON

State Bar No. 24089661 pboston@langleybanack.com 745 East Mulberry, Suite 900 San Antonio, Texas 78212

- 3166 (210) 736

- 6600 Telephone (210) 735

- 6889 Facsimile

ERIC W. MATZKE ( pro hac vice )

WI State Bar No. 1079340

E ric.Matzke@quarles.com QUARLES & BRADY LLP 411 E. Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2350

Milwaukee WI 53202

- 4426 (414) 277

- 5365 Telephone (414) 978

- 8906 Facsimile

A TTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

- APPELLANT METSO MINERAL INDUSTRIES, INC.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served upon the following on this

26 day of August, 2015 , via email and regular mail :

Mr. Daniel R. Dutko DDutko@hanszenlaporte.com

H ANSZEN L A P ORTE 11767 Katy Freeway, Ste. 850 Houston, Texas 77970 Attorneys for Maverick Aggregates, Inc.

Mr. Oscar A. Garza ogarza@oscargarzalaw.com

T HE L AW F IRM OF O SCAR A. G ARZA

, LLC 111 Soledad Street, Suite 300 San Antonio, Texas 78205 Attorney for IPE Aggregate, LLC

Mr. G. Alan Powers apowers@sbplaw.com

S IMPSON

, B OYD & P OWERS
P. O. Box 685

1119 Halsell Street Bridgeport, Texas 76426 Attorneys for Crisp Industries, Inc.

/ s/ Catherine M. S t one CATHERINE M. STONE
>~-"o"DEc0 

• Miami-Dade County Public Schools 

&('cscr-.oo" giving our students the world 

Superintendent of Schools 

Alberto M. Carvalho Zil I] jAN Ill P 2: 2 \ 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor, 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

DOCKET#: F AA-2000-7997 

EXEMPTION #: 7560E 

January 7, 2013 

Miami-Dade County School Board 

Perla Tabares Hantman, Chair 

Dr. Martin Karp, Vice Chair 

Dr. Dorothy Bendross-Mindinga/1 

Susie II. Castillo 

Carlos L. Curbelo 

Dr. Lawrence S. Feldman 

Dr. Wilbert "Tee" Holloway 

Dr. Marta Perez 

Raquel A. Regalado 

SUBJECT: REQUEST TO EXTEND EXEMPTION NO. 7560E FROM 14 CFR (FAR SECTION) -

PART: 65.17(a); 65.19(b); 65.75 

Dear Sirs: 

George T. Baker Ayiation.School is requesting an extension of the following exemption that will expire on May 31, 2013: . ~~ r. . ' ! • ",. ~--

Exemption No. 7560E from 14 CFR (FAR Section) 

Part: 65.17(a); 

65.19(b); 

65.75. 

. . . 

This exemption continues to have a positive impact on the enrollment and the number of licensed Airframe and Powerplant 

Technicians graduating from George T. Baker Aviation School. The school offers the Federal Aviation Administration 

approved Airframe and Powerplant Aviation Maintenance Curriculum under Air Agency Certificate Number CT9T072R. 

Your approval of this extension will be greatly appreciated. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

cc: Mr. Ernst Biamby, Jr. 

Federal Aviation Administration.Safety Inspector 

South Florida Flight Standards DistriCt Office-19 .·. 

2895 S. W. l45thAvenue, Suite 120 

Miramar, Florida 33027 · 

George T. Baker Aviation School • 3275 N. W. 42nd Avenue • Miami, FL 33142 USA • Dr. Sean Gallagan, Principal 

305-871-3143 • 305-871-5840 (FAX) • www.BakerAviation.edu
1The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2731

___________

United States of America, *

 * 

Appellee, * 

 * Appeal from the United States

 v. * District Court for the District of

* Minnesota. 

Christopher Dean Williams, also known * 

as Scat, also known as Anthony Phillip * [UNPUBLISHED]

Hollis, also known as Rodney Flowers, * 

 * 

 Appellant. * 

___________

Submitted: October 18, 1999

Filed: October 22, 1999

___________

Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIUM.

Christopher Williams was tried by jury in the district court1 and convicted of one

count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine and crack

cocaine and one count of using a telephone in connection with a drug offense in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b). On appeal, Williams argues that (1) two witnesses,
-2-

James Horton and Tonya Frost, were given something of value in exchange for their

testimony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2) and therefore their testimony should be

excluded, (2) the district court gave inadequate jury instructions on the credibility of

witnesses testifying in order to receive reduced sentences, (3) Williams's trial should

have been severed from that of his co-defendants, (4) the district court erred in

admitting the crack cocaine found in a hotel room shared by Williams and two others

because the foundation was insufficient, and (5) the evidence as a whole was

insufficient.

We consistently have held that the government does not violate section 201(c)(2)

by putting on the testimony of witnesses who have received leniency in return for their

testimony. See United States v. Albanese, No. 99-1078, slip op. at 8-10 (8th Cir. Oct.

5, 1999). Therefore, the district court was correct in admitting the testimony of Horton

and Frost at Williams's trial. 

Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the district court

properly instructed the jury on the credibility of the witnesses, denied the severance of

the trials, found a proper foundation to admit the cocaine from the hotel room, and had

sufficient evidence to support the conviction. Accordingly, the conviction is affirmed.

See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 35.19



LOGO

Annual Statement of Compliance

GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-GC34

VIA EMAIL

To Addresses on Exhibit A:



| | Re: | GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-GC34, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC34 (the Trust), issued pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
October 1, 2015 (the Agreement), by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator and Trustee, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer and Midland Loan Services, A Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator, hereby certify that:

(1) A review of the activities of the Certificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the Reporting Period) and of
the performance of the Certificate Administrator under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(2) To the best of my
knowledge, based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such Reporting Period.

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

Date: March 15, 2016



|                                                             |  |                       
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------
|U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator
|                                                             | 
|By:                                                          |  | /s/ Kimberly O. Jacobs
|                                                             |  | Kimberly O. Jacobs    
|                                                             |  | Senior Vice President 



---

LOGO



Exhibit A

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II

200 West Street

New York, New York 10282-2198

Attention: GSMS 2015-GC34

leah.nivison@gs.com

Citibank, N.A.

388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor

New York, New York 10013

Attention: Citibank Agency & Trust  CGCMT 2015-GC35

john.hannon@citi.com
**EXHIBIT31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, H. James Serrone, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-QSB of Torotel, Inc.

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and wehave:

 

a)                        designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)                       evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “EvaluationDate”); and

 

c)                        presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)                        allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)                       anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterlyreport whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| /s/  H. James Serrone |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |
|                            |
| H. James Serrone                |
| Chief Financial Officer         |
| April 8, 2005              |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Thomas
Brandt, Executive Vice President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Trans-Lux
Corporation, do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

    (1) The Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

    This Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not
be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Registrant or
the certifying officer.



                                       /s/ Thomas Brandt
                                       -----------------------------
Date:  November 17, 2006               Thomas Brandt
                                       Executive Vice President and
                                       Co-Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 4.15.3



LOGO



| |  |  |  |                                                        
| |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | Level 7, 151 Macquarie Street Sydney
NSW 2000 Australia

Mr Marc Voigt

Managing Director
and Chief Executive Officer

Prima BioMed Limited

1 June 2015

Dear Marc

Variation to Executive Employment Agreement dated 1 August 2014 (Agreement)

Further to our recent discussions, Prima BioMed Limited (Prima)agrees to vary your Agreement as set out in the attached Schedule.

This variation is effective from Monday 1 June 2015. Your new Remuneration will start being paid to you from the next payroll run, with any back pay
backdated to 1 June 2015 paid on this day as well.

All other terms and conditions of your Agreement remain the same.

Please indicate your acceptance of this variation by signing (in duplicate) this letter and returning one executed copy to me.

Prima looks forward to your ongoing assistance.



|                         
|-------------------------
|Yours faithfully,        
|                         
|/s/ Lucy Turnbull AO     
|Lucy Turnbull AO         
|Chairman Prima BioMed
Ltd

I accept the variation to the Agreement



|              
|--------------
|/s/ Marc Voigt
|Marc Voigt    



---

Schedule

Agreed amendments to Agreement:



|                 |  |                                           
|---------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Clause           |  | Agreed Amendment                          
|                 | 
|Para 3, clause 3 |  | Replace 195,000 Euro with 215,000 Euro
OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE

 

 

I, Karen Montbach, a Managing Director of Citibank, N.A. (the “Company”), hereby certify, with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”), by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as depositor, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as master servicer, C-III Asset Management LLC, as special servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as operating advisor, Citibank, N.A., as certificate administrator (the “Certificate Administrator”), and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, the following:

 

1. A review of the Company's activities as Certificate Administrator during the reporting period ending December 31, 2015 and its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the reporting period ending December 31, 2015, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

 

This statement is given by the undersigned as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigned’s individual capacity.

 

Date: February 26, 2016

 

 

Citibank, N.A.

 

By: /s/ Karen Montbach

Name: Karen Montbach

Title: Managing Director

 

 

CGCMT 2015-GC35
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 EASTERN DIVISION 

ROBERT FRANCIS CASSIDY, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. Civil Action 2:12-cv-668 

Judge Marbley 

Magistrate Judge King 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant. 

ORDER

On December 26, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended 

that plaintiff’s unopposed motion for an award of attorney fees and costs, 

Doc. No. 25, be granted. Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 26. Although 

the parties were advised of their right to object to that recommendation, 

and of the consequences of their failure to do so, there has been no 

objection. 

The Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 26, is ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED. 

Plaintiff’s motion for an award of attorney fees and costs, Doc. No. 25, 

is GRANTED. Plaintiff is AWARDED an attorney fee, costs, and expenses 

under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §2412, in the total amount 

of $5,865.60, as well as the $350.00 filing fee. If it is determined that 

plaintiff does not owe a debt to the United States, that amount may be paid 

directly to plaintiff=s counsel in light of plaintiff=s assignment to that 

effect. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2527 (2010). 

 ____s/Algenon L. Marbley______ 

 Algenon L. Marbley 

 United States District Judge 

Case: 2:12-cv-00668-ALM-NMK Doc #: 27 Filed: 07/14/14 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76

36 38 40 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 1000 1500 2000 1000 18 12 06 00 06/21 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 21 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH, LLC | 130 S. Jefferson, Suite 300

Chicago, IL 60661

312-233-6440 |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OFCOMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’SREGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year endingDecember 31, 2016, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for **WellsFargo Bank** (the “Servicer”).

 

National Tax Search, LLC(“NTS”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31,2016 and for the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the“Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the“CFR”). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS bythe Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Onlyservicing criteria 1122 (d) (l)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the“Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activitiesNTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS hasdetermined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) ofthe SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs withrespect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered bythis report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer usingNTS’s TaxQ system (the “Platform Transactions”).

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessedits compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Periodand has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with theApplicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the ReportingPeriod with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante & Moran, PLLC, anindependent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation reporton the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as ofDecember 31, 2016 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

National Tax Search, LLC, asVendor to Servicer

 

 

/s/ Lori D. Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO 

January 23, 2017
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Co-Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the“Report”) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael S. Gross, the Co-Chief Executive Officer ofthe Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 
 
/S/    MICHAEL S.GROSS
**Name**: **Michael S. Gross****Date:** **February 20, 2020**
 
**
Before the First Division,

February 25, 1943

No. 48054.

#### Protests 63569-K, etc., of Asia Co. et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The issue is whether the fish were packed in oil. Several samples were admitted in evidence and the only witness produced was a Government chemist at the port of entry, who testified in behalf of the plaintiff. The record presented was very meager, but it is undisputed that the fish as imported contained vegetable oil. Following *Strchmeyer*v. *Untied States*(5 Ct. Cust. Appls. 527, T. D. 35175) the merchandise was held to be properly dutiable as assessed. *United States*v. *Marks Co.*(29 C. C. P. A. 77, C. A. D. 173) distinguished.