alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 258 

To commend Timothy Scott Wineman. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2005 

Mr. FRIST (for himself, Mr. REID, and Mr. BENNETT) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To commend Timothy Scott Wineman. 

Whereas Timothy S. Wineman became an employee of the 

United States Senate on October 19, 1970, and since 

that date has ably and faithfully upheld the high standards and traditions of the staff of the United States Senate for a period that included 19 Congresses; 

Whereas Timothy S. Wineman has served in the senior management of the Disbursing Office for more than 25 years, 

first as the Assistant Financial Clerk of the United 

States Senate from August 1, 1980 to April 30, 1998, 

and finally as Financial Clerk of the United States Senate from May 1, 1998 to October 14, 2005; 

Whereas Timothy S. Wineman has faithfully discharged the 

difficult duties and responsibilities of his position as Financial Clerk of the United States Senate with great 
2 

•SRES 258 ATS 

pride, energy, efficiency, dedication, integrity, and professionalism; 

Whereas Timothy S. Wineman has earned the respect, affection, and esteem of the United States Senate; and 

Whereas Timothy S. Wineman will retire from the United 

States Senate on October 14, 2005, with 35 years of 

service with the United States Senate all with the Disbursing Office: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the United States Senate commends 

2 Timothy S. Wineman for his exemplary service to the 

3 United States Senate and the Nation, and wishes to ex4 press its deep appreciation and gratitude for his long, 

5 faithful, and outstanding service. 

6 SEC. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit 

7 a copy of this resolution to Timothy S. Wineman. 

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TSR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John G. Sharkey, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

The forgoing certification is incorporated solely for the purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended
to be used for any other purpose.


/s/ John G. Sharkey
---------------------------
Vice President-Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
October 2, 2006
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 2:12-CR-155 (2)

JUDGE SMITH

CARLOS ANTONIO AGUILAR,

Date of Original Judgment:

Defendant. January 8, 2014 

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Reduce Sentence, pursuant

to 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(2), in an “Agreed Disposition Case.” (Doc. 177). Defendant was

originally sentenced on December 11, 2013 to 95 months imprisonment for conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute 1,000 grams or more of heroin. Defendant’s advisory sentencing

guideline range was 120 to 135 months, based on an offense level 29 and criminal history

category III. 

On November 1, 2014, the United States Sentencing Commission promulgated Guideline

Amendment 782, which reduced by two levels the offense levels assigned to the drug quantities

set forth in §2D1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, as well as parallel changes for

the listed chemicals found in §2D1.11. Defendants who are currently imprisoned for these drug

offenses are eligible for retroactive application of the guidelines as long as they meet certain

eligibility criteria.

The parties agree that the Defendant meets the Sentencing Commission’s eligibility

requirements for the retroactive application of Amendment 782 to his case. After considering

the original guideline range, the extent of any downward departure, the circumstances of

Defendant’s case, and his behavior while incarcerated, the parties jointly recommend a reduction

Case: 2:12-cr-00155-GCS-NMK Doc #: 181 Filed: 03/04/15 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
of Defendant’s sentence to a term of incarceration of 77 months. 

Whether to grant a reduction of sentence pursuant to §3582(c)(2) is within the discretion

of the court. United States v. Ursery, 109 F.3d 1129, 1137 (6th Cir. 1997). In considering

whether a reduced sentence is appropriate, this court must consider the factors in 18 U.S.C.

§3553(a) to the extent that they are applicable. See §3582(c)(2). 

Upon consideration of Defendant’s motion, the statutory sentencing factors set forth in

§3553(a), and the joint recommendation of the parties, the Court concludes that a reduction of

Defendant’s term of incarceration is appropriate in light of the reduction in the applicable

guideline range. The sentence of 95 months incarceration previously imposed in this case is

hereby reduced to a term of incarceration of 77 months. Under Amendment 782, Defendant’s

release date shall be no earlier than November 1, 2015. Except as provided above, all other

provisions of the judgment previously entered in this case shall remain in effect.

The Clerk shall remove Document 177 from the Court’s pending motion’s list.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Order Date: March 4, 2015

Effective Date: November 1, 2015

-2-

Case: 2:12-cr-00155-GCS-NMK Doc #: 181 Filed: 03/04/15 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9288 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to procure cleaning products that are 

identified by the Safer Choice program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2024 

Ms. SLOTKIN (for herself and Ms. MACE) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to procure cleaning products that are identified by the Safer Choice program, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prioritizing PFAS5 Free Cleaning Products Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROCUREMENT OF CLEANING PRODUCTS. 

7 The Secretary of Defense shall, to the maximum ex8 tent practicable, only procure cleaning products that are 

9 identified by— 

10 (1) the Safer Choice program; or 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9288 IH

1 (2) an independent third-party organization 

2 that provides certifications in a manner consistent 

3 with the Safer Choice program. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32.3


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Angela
D. Toppi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Trans-Lux
Corporation, do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

    (1) The Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

    This Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not
be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Registrant or
the certifying officer.



                                       /s/ Angela D. Toppi
                                       --------------------------------
Date:  November 14, 2007               Angela D. Toppi
                                       Executive Vice President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Universal City Development Partners, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 2, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert K. Gault, Jr. certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 11, 2006



By:

/s/ ROBERT K. GAULT, JR.Robert K. Gault, Jr. Principal Executive Officer




27
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON U N I TED STA TES C O U R T O F A PPEA LS FO R TH E N I N TH C I R C U I T W E ARE AM E RI CA/ S OM OS AM E RI CA COAL I T I ON OF A R I Z O N A e t a l. , P l ai n t i ffs - A p p el l an t s, v. M ARI COP A COUNT Y B OARD OF S U P E R V I S O R S e t a l. , D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 15281 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 6 - c v - 0 2 8 1 6 - RCB ME MORA ND UM *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona R obe rtC . B r oom f

i e l d, S e ni orD i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry9, 2010 S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B e f o r e : KOZ I NS KI , C h ie f J u d g e , G O O D W IN a nd I K U TA , C i rcu i tJu d g es. T he di stri ctcourtcorr ec t l y det erm i ned thati tl ac ked j uri sdi ct i on un der Y ou ng erv. H arri s, 40 1 U . S . 37 (197 1), t o con si der the cl ai m s of the si x p l ai nt i ff s w ho ar e M exi can n at i on al s: A fe dera l courtdeci si on w ou l d i m prop er l y i nt er fe re 

# FI LED JU L 12 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSpage 2

w i th the st at e c ri m i nal proceedi ng s thathad al re ady begun agai nstthem . S ee W o o d f e a th e r s , I n c . v . W a s h . C o u n ty , 1 8 0 F .3 d1 0 1 7 , 1 0 2 0 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 9 ) . A r i z onaha s a n i m port a nti nt e r e s ti n e nf or c i ng i t s c r i m i na l s t a tut e s , a nd i t ’ s not

“ r e a di l yappa r e nt ” tha tf e de r a l l a w pr e e m pt s A r i z . R e v. S t a t . § 13- 2319 or M ar i copa C ou nty’ s e nforcement pol i cy . S ee i d. at10 21 . T he M exi can n at i on al p la in tif f s a ls o h a v e a n a d e q u a te o p p o rtu n ityto litig a te th e irc o n s titu tio n a l c la im s in the s t a t e c ourtpr oc e e di ngs . S e e i d. a t1020–21. T he di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d, how e ve r , i n c onc l udi ng tha tY ounge rabs t e nt i on barr ed i tfr om consi deri ng the organi za t i on al and t axpaye r c l ai m s. T ho se pl ai nt i ff s w e r e n ’t p a rtie s to th e s ta te c o u rt p r o c e e d in g s , a n dth e y ’r e n o t s u f f ic ie n tly i nt e rtw i ne d w i th the pl a i nt i f f s w ho w e r e pa rt i e s t o tr i gge rY ounge r . S e e D or a n v. S a l e m I nn, I nc . , 422 U . S . 922, 928–29 ( 1975) ; G r e e n v. C i tyof T us c on, 255 F . 3d 1086, 1099–1100 ( 9th C i r . 2001) ( e n ba nc ) , l i m i t e d on othe rgr ounds , G i l be rt s on v. A l bri gh t , 38 1 F . 3d 96 5, 96 8– 69 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( en banc). O n rem and, the di stri ct c ourtm us ts t i l l de t e rm i ne w he the rthe or ga ni z a t i ona l a nd t a xpa y e rpl a i nt i f f s ha ve st an d i n g t o p u rsu e th ei r cl ai m s. AF F I RME D I N P AR T , RE V E RS E D I N P AR T AN D R E MAND E D. N o co st s.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          822100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1669118
<ALLOWANCES>                                     24418
<INVENTORY>                                    1053200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3770100
<PP&E>                                          985288
<DEPRECIATION>                                  308216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9826700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1071000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          1080000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      55750600
<OTHER-SE>                                  (48074900)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8755700
<SALES>                                        2746400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2746400
<CGS>                                          1575800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1467300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  7700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 24418
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               20200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (267400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (304400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   37000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (267400)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Michael
R. Mulcahy, President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Trans-Lux Corporation,
do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

    (1) The Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2007 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

    This Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not
be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Registrant or
the certifying officer.



                                       /s/ Michael R. Mulcahy
                                       ----------------------------------------
Date:  August 14, 2007                 Michael R. Mulcahy
                                       President and Co-Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-10851

RODNEY BERNARD ALLEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

SHAMELLE N. LYLES, Program Analyst, U.S. Department of Justice, Office 

of Professional Responsibility; CRAIG WATKINS, Criminal District Attorney, 

Dallas County, Texas; INNOCENCE PROJECT OF TEXAS; MICHAEL L. 

WARE, Assistant District Attorney, Dallas County, Texas,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:13-CV-1480

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rodney Bernard Allen, federal prisoner # 28935-077, moves this court 

for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in his appeal of the district court’s 

dismissal of his complaint alleging claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown 

Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983, the Federal Tort Claims Act, and Texas state law. By moving for IFP 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 9, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-10851 Document: 00512591176 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/09/2014
No. 13-10851

status in this court, Allen is challenging the district court’s certification that 

his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 

(5th Cir. 1997); FED. R. APP. P. 24(a). 

Allen has failed to address the district court’s certification that his 

appeal was not taken in good faith or the district court’s reasons for its 

certification decision. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202. Accordingly, his challenge 

to the district court’s certification decision is deemed abandoned. See 

Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 

1987). Additionally, Allen has not shown that his “appeal involves legal points 

arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” Howard v. King, 707 

F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). 

Allen’s motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal is denied, and his appeal is 

dismissed as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 & n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

The district court’s dismissal of Allen’s complaint, in part, for failure to 

state a claim counts as a strike under § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 

103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). This court’s dismissal of this appeal also 

counts as a strike. See id. Allen is cautioned that if he accumulates three 

strikes under § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed IFP in any civil action or 

appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is 

under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).

MOTION FOR IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; 

SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

2

 Case: 13-10851 Document: 00512591176 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/09/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5

<S>                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               AUG-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                  SEP-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<CASH>                          840
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                840
<PP&E>                          1,232,821
<DEPRECIATION>                  1,211,205
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  23,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           6,690,427
<BONDS>                         20,437
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        38,258,096
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    23,346
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                351,663
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,420,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (1,772,481)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (1,772,481)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (1,772,481)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.05)


</TABLE>
# C_2008096EN.01000101.xml

| 17.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 April 2008

(2008/C 96/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5928 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 161,41 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4603 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80610 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4038 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5896 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 117,81 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8985 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,848 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 254,26 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6972 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,4213 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6278 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 32,355 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1189 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7069 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6073 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,4135 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0223 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1551 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 576,39 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,7100 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 11,1365 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2570 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 639,42 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0229 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,778 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 37,2390 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,149 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6641 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6417 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5928

JPY

Japanese yen

161,41

DKK

Danish krone

7,4603

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80610

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4038

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5896

ISK

Iceland króna

117,81

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8985

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,848

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

254,26

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6972

PLN

Polish zloty

3,4213

RON

Romanian leu

3,6278

SKK

Slovak koruna

32,355

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1189

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7069

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6073

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,4135

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0223

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1551

KRW

South Korean won

1 576,39

ZAR

South African rand

12,7100

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

11,1365

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2570

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 639,42

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0229

PHP

Philippine peso

66,778

RUB

Russian rouble

37,2390

THB

Thai baht

50,149

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6641

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6417

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---