alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 35.1
 VW Credit, Inc. Annual Servicer Compliance Statement
Pursuant to Section 7.11 of the Transaction SUBI Servicing Supplement
And Item 1123 of Regulation AB
 
   1.
    
    A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from November 4, 2010
through December 31, 2010, and of its performance under the Transaction SUBI Servicing
Supplement was conducted under my supervision.2.
    
    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has, fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Transaction SUBI Servicing Supplement in all material respects
throughout such period.
  /s/ Andrew StuartName:
    Andrew StuartTitle:
    Executive Vice President & CFO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARK DAVID SMITH,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 619 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of February, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
No. 50635.

#### Protest 969068-G of Henry Pollak, Inc. (New York).

*311Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The reeord established that certain of the involved items consist of hats similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 47291. Upon the established facts and following the authority cited the merchandise in question was held dutiable as claimed.
1 Pursuant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 98-60212 Summary Calendar

KELL S. LYON, JR, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,

VERSUS FRED’S INC doing business as Fred’s, ET AL,
Defendants,

FRED’S STORES OF TENNESSEE INC.,

Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

(2:96-CV-141-B-B)

March 1, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHÉ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

We have conducted a de novo review of the record, and the law,

and have caref ully considered the written argument of counsel.

This study convinces us that the district court was correct in
concluding that, as a matter of law, probable cause did exist for

an o bjectively reasonable person to believe that Plaintiff had2

shoplifted an item of merchandise from the store, and that the
bringing of the charge was without malice. Accordingly, we affirm
the grant of Judgment As A Matter of Law to Defendant. Having so
concluded, we dismiss the Appellee’s cross-appeal as moot.

AFFIRMED, CROSS-APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT.
A03A0172.

#### MALDONADO v. THE STATE.

(580 SE2d 330)

Mikell, Judge.

Israel Maldonado pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. Pursuant to the negotiated guilty plea, he was sentenced on December 13, 2001, to five years, four in confinement and one suspended. On June 28, 2002, Maldonado filed a pro se motion to modify his sentence, asserting that he had been incarcerated since October 10, 2000, and that a summary report he received from the Georgia Department of Corrections indicated that the trial court failed to give him credit for time served. The trial court denied the motion, ruling that Maldonado’s release date was within the discretion of the State Board of Pardons and Paroles. Maldonado, proceeding pro se, appeals the denial of his motion. He is correct that “each person convicted of a crime in this state shall be given full credit for each day spent in confinement awaiting trial and the credit or credits shall be applied toward the convicted person’s sentence. OCGA § 17-10-11 (a).”1 However, even if *Addo*had precedential value, the amount of credit given for time served is computed by the pre-sentence custodian, and it is awarded by the post-sentence custodian.2 Therefore, the trial court is not involved in this process.3 Finally, OCGA § 17-10-11 (a) “applies only to persons who would not be confined but for the charges which *581give rise to the sentence for which credit is sought.”4 Here, even removing the disputed 14 months, Maldonado would not be currently eligible for release. Thus, his

Decided March 26, 2003.

Israel Maldonado, *pro se.*

*Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Amir a A. Arshad, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

> sole complaint goes to the Board’s calculation of credit on a legitimately entered sentence that is currently being legitimately served. Accordingly, [Maldonado’s] claim is cognizable only in a mandamus or injunction action against the Commissioner of the Department of Corrections or in a petition for habeas corpus, depending on what point in time in the service of [Maldonado’s] sentence any additional action may be filed.5

It follows that the trial court did not err in denying Maldonado’s motion to modify his sentence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Johnson, P. J, and Eldridge, J., concur.*

1

 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) *Addo v. State,*212 Ga. App. 163 (1) (441 SE2d 486) (1994) (physical precedent only).

2

Id.

3

*Diaz v. State,*245 Ga. App. 380, 381 (2) (537 SE2d 784) (2000).

4

 (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) *Beasley v.*State, 255 Ga. App. 522 (566 SE2d 333) (2002).

5

Id. at 523.
#### United States *v.*Tomas Perez

No. 7609.

Entry No. 708550.

— Invoice dated Havana, Cuba, August 1943.

Certified August 1943.

Entered at New York, N. Y., September 20, 1943.

(Decided July 20, 1948)

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster*and *Samuel D. Spector,*special attorneys), for the plaintiff.

No-appearance by defendant.

Cline, Judge:

This is a collector’s appeal for reappraisement of certain bard candy and chocolate tablets imported from Cuba on *273May 31, 1943. The bard candy was invoiced at 15 cents per pound and entered and appraised at 15 cents per pound plus 2% per centum tax. Tbe chocolate tablets were invoiced at 16 cents per pound and entered and appraised at 12 cents per tablet plus *2%*per centum tax.

When this case was first called for trial the parties agreed that it should be suspended under reappraisement No. 154039-A, which involved hard candy and chocolate bars exported from Cuba by the same exporter as herein and at about the same time. At a subsequent hearing there was no appearance on the part of the defendant and counsel for the Government stated:

Your Honor, this defendant hasn’t appeared on several occasions.

Prior to this time I believe he was in the Army. We communicated with the Commanding Officer, and kept on continuing this case until after he was out of the Army.

I see a new address on this case, apparently. I have been informed by Mr. Carey that he had been around here at one time, and they got this new address from him.

In view of the circumstances I believe we ought to submit the case this morning. There is no evidence we have, other than the incorporation of the record under which this case has been suspended originally.

I formally move the incorporation of the record in Reappraisement 154039-A, and submit the case.

In the incorporated case, the hard candy was invoiced and entered at 15 cents per pound and appraised at 21 cents per pound except in one instance where it was appraised at 18 cents per pound. The chocolate was invoiced and entered at 16 cents per package of two bars of chocolate and appraised at 26 cents per package in some instances and at 28 cents per package in other instances.. The trial court held that the export value was the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise and that such values were the entered values. *Louis Victor et al.*v. *United States,*18 Cust. Ct. 292, Reap. Dec. 6753. This decision was affirmed on appeal. *United States*v. *Louis Victor et al. Louis Victor et al.*v. *United States,*20 Cust. Ct. 362, Reap. Dec. 7522.

Since the entered and appraised values in the instant case are higher than the entered and final appraised values in the incorporated case and since there is nothing in the record to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the appraiser’s valuation, I hold that the export value as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such values are the appraised values.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 50224.

#### Protests 60793-K, etc., of Colchester Galleries, Ltd., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
UN I TE D ST AT ES D I STR I CT C OU RT F O R T H E D IS T R IC T O F C O LU M B IA

__________________________________________ ) JASPE R L . D OC KE RY ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Ci vi l A cti on No. 08 -08 06 (P L F) ) UNI TED STATES DEPARTMENT ) OF T REASURY, I nterna l Revenue Ser vice, )

) De fe nd ant. ) __________________________________________)
ORDER For the re asons stated in the a ccompa nying Me morandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDE RED that de fe nd ant’ s mo tio n to dis mis s [D kt. #9 ] is G RA NT ED ; and

it i s F U R T H E R

O R D E R E D th a tth i s c i v i l a c t i o ni s D IS M IS S E D i ni t s e n t i r e ty. This is a final appe alable O rder
. SeeFe d. R. App. P. 4(a). SO ORDERED.
/s/______________________ PAULL . FRI EDMAN Un i t edS t at es Di s tri ct J u d ge DATE: January

23, 2009
Exhibit 11.1

STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

The
following information sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net increase in net assets per share resulting from operations for the year ended December 31, 2014



|                                                                    |  |   |            | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ---------- | 
|Numerator for increase in net assets per share  basic and diluted: |  | $ | 11,690     | 
|Denominator for basic weighted average shares:                      |  |   | 11,532,985 | 
|Earnings per share  basic and diluted:                             |  | $ | 1.01       |
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                                             5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1,000,000
       
<S>                                                              <C>    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                              113
<SECURITIES>                                                      1,667
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     2,460
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                            3,383
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    1,437
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   53,633
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 0
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                             63
<OTHER-SE>                                                        5,021
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     53,633
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  1,559
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     1,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     14
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     229
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         75
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 154
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        154
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      2.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      2.34
        


</TABLE>
www.fra.dot.gov

Port of Northern Montana Multimodal Hub

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the Port of Northern Montana Multimodal Hub?

The Port of Northern Montana Multimodal Hub (Project) is a proposed inland port facility capable of shipping large cargo and containerized freight

via railway. Currently, Montana does not have the ability to ship or receive containerized cargo via rail due to a lack of an inland port. Shippers 

would continue to rely on roadway transportation to ship goods, resulting in high freight costs. The City of Shelby has completed Environmental 

Assessment (EA) pursuant to 42 USC § 4332, 49 USC § 303, and 64 FR 28545 for the proposed action, which includes: rail spurs, access roads, street 

upgrades, utilities, wastewater/stormwater facilities, laydown area, and a bulk material facility. 

Q: What are the benefits of the Project?

• Reduced greenhouse gas emissions • Reduced roadway maintenance costs • Job creation

• Regional and local economic growth • Reduced commercial traffic within 

downtown Shelby

• Increased tax revenue

Q: Where is the Project going to be located?

The Project will be located southeast of Shelby within Township 31 North, Range 2 West, Sections 2 & 3 and Township 32 North, Range 2 West, 

Sections 27, 28, 33, 34 and 35. The total Project area covers approximately 260 acres and is anticipated to begin construction in 2013.

 

Q: What if I have concerns or comments? Where can I find more information on the Project?

The EA will be available for public review at the Shelby City Hall, the Shelby Public Library and the FRA website 

http://www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0214 from April 1 - April 30, 2013. Additionally, a public open house meeting will be held on April 15, 2013 at 7:30 

PM at the Shelby City Hall, 112 1st Street South, Shelby, Montana, to address any comments or concerns you may have regarding the Project. If 

unable to attend the meeting, your questions and comments can be provided by mail to: Brad Koon, KLJ, PO Box 1567, Helena, MT 59601-1201; 

by email to brad.koon@kljeng.com or by phone at (406) 447-3344. We request your comments by April 30th to ensure that there is ample time 

to review and incorporate the comments during the environmental review process.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 9, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50664 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OSCAR DANIEL CISNEROS-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-2447-ALL

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Oscar Daniel Cisneros-Lopez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
# C_2008266EN.01000801.xml

| 21.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 266/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 266/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 October 2008

(2008/C 266/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3424 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,45 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4538 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,77165 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,919 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5299 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 305 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,787 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,986 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 268,27 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7091 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,5766 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6545 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,465 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0331 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,936 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,59 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4133 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,179 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9853 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 768,61 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,5213 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,1685 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,1792 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 215,93 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7279 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,3 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,2765 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,017 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,8329 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1693 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3424

JPY

Japanese yen

136,45

DKK

Danish krone

7,4538

GBP

Pound sterling

0,77165

SEK

Swedish krona

9,919

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5299

ISK

Iceland króna

305

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,787

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,986

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

268,27

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7091

PLN

Polish zloty

3,5766

RON

Romanian leu

3,6545

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,465

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0331

AUD

Australian dollar

1,936

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,59

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4133

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,179

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9853

KRW

South Korean won

1 768,61

ZAR

South African rand

13,5213

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,1685

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,1792

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 215,93

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7279

PHP

Philippine peso

64,3

RUB

Russian rouble

35,2765

THB

Thai baht

46,017

BRL

Brazilian real

2,8329

MXN

Mexican peso

17,1693

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 253 

Designating October 7, 2005, as ‘‘National ‘It’s Academic’ Television Quiz 

Show Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2005 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. CLINTON) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 7, 2005, as ‘‘National ‘It’s Academic’ 

Television Quiz Show Day’’. 

Whereas ‘‘It’s Academic’’, the Nation’s foremost televised 

high school quiz show, will begin its 45th season on 

NBC4 in Washington, District of Columbia, and is the 

longest running television quiz show in the Nation’s history; 

Whereas ‘‘It’s Academic’’ has used the power of television to 

motivate and showcase 2 generations of students in cities 

across the country, including students in Washington, 

District of Columbia; Baltimore, Maryland; Charlottesville, North Carolina; Buffalo, New York City, and Rochester, New York; Los Angeles, California; Chicago, Illinois; Honolulu, Hawaii; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Boston, Massachusetts; Denver, Colorado; Cincinnati and 
2 

•SRES 253 IS

Cleveland, Ohio; Jacksonville, Florida; Norfolk, Virginia; 

Fort Wayne, Indiana; Wilmington, Delaware; and students throughout the state of Kentucky; 

Whereas each year hundreds of secondary schools—public, 

parochial, private, suburban, rural, and inner-city—compete on ‘‘It’s Academic’’, demonstrating a diverse student 

population focused on academic excellence and encouraging community support for education; 

Whereas the dedicated teachers who work with the teams and 

prepare them for the competition on ‘‘It’s Academic’’ are 

introduced on the program, providing those teachers with 

positive recognition that reflects on the entire teaching 

profession; 

Whereas the corporate sponsors of ‘‘It’s Academic’’ have generously given scholarship grants to participating schools 

to help students pursue their education; 

Whereas ‘‘It’s Academic’’ has encouraged academic excellence 

by promoting academic competition as a motivating factor and generates the same adulation and respect for student scholars as for student athletes; and 

Whereas ‘‘It’s Academic’’ continues to provide a forum for 

showcasing academic excellence at the high school level 

and for presenting a positive image of schools, teachers, 

and students, thereby helping to offset negative stereotypes: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates October 7, 2005, as ‘‘National 

3 ‘It’s Academic’ Television Quiz Show Day’’; and 
3 

•SRES 253 IS

1 (2) calls on the people of the United States to 

2 observe the day by supporting the academic success 

3 of students and their local schools. 

Æ
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 21

- 00096

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Z.H. AND Z.H., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 307th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020

- 1156

- DR

Before Mo rr iss, C.J. , Stevens and Carter , * JJ.

______________________________________ *Jack Carter, Justice, Retired, Sitting by Assignment2 ORDER
Our review of the Appellant’s brief in this matter indicates that it contains the identities
of the minor children at issue in this parental

- rights termination case in violation of Rule 9.8 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Rule 9.8(b) states,

(b) Parental

- Rights Termination Cases . In an appeal or an original proceeding in an appellate court, arising out of a case in w hich t he termination of parental rights was at issue:

(1) except for a docketing statement, in all papers submitted to the court, including all appendix items submitted with a brief , petition, or motion: (A) a minor must be identified only by an a lias unle ss the court orders otherwise . . . .
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 9.8(b)(1)(A) ( second , third , and fourth emphas e s added) ; see also T EX

. R. A PP

. P.
9.9. The appellant’s brief contains the real names of the minor children under the Statement of
the Case se ct ion of th e brief, as well as in the Order of Termination contained in the appendix to
the brief. To protect the identity of the child ren , we hereby st rike the Appellant’s brief and order
that appellant refile his brief using only aliases for the minor ch il dren , in accordance with Rule
9. 8 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. We further order that Appellant’s corrected brief by refiled on or befor e January 26 , 2022

. We note that this is not a license for Appellant to
revise the substance of his bri ef

. IT IS S O ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: January 19 , 2022