alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces a meeting of the aforementioned Special Emphasis Panel.

*Time and Date:*                         12 p.m.-4 p.m., June 5, 2007 (Closed).                     

*Place:*                         Teleconference.                     

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                     

*Matters To Be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the review, discussion, and evaluation of research grant applications received in response to RFA DP07-002, “Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research Centers: Special Interest Project Competitive Supplements (Panel 7).”                     

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Sheree Marshall Williams, PhD, M.Sc., Scientific Review Administrator, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., MS D72, Atlanta, GA 30333, telephone 404.639.4896.                     

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                 

Dated: April 10, 2007. 

Elaine L. Baker 

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E7-7332 Filed 4-17-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
R&D Film 1, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

John Does, 

Defendants. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

ORDER 

Case Nos. 2:12-cv-1112; 

2:12-cv-1113; 2:12-cv-1115; 

2:12-cv-1116; 2:12-cv-1117; 

2: 12-cv-1120; 2: 12-cv-1136; 

2:12-cv-1137; 2:12-cv-1138; 

2:12-cv-1139; 

Judge Michael H. Watson 

On August 21, 2013, United States Magistrate Judge Deavers filed 

Reports and Recommendations ("R&R") concerning the disposition of R&D Film 

1, LLC's ("Plaintiff') Complaint in these cases. The R&Rs recommended 

dismissing these actions without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 4(m) for failure to timely effect service of process. 

The R&Rs notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&Rs 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). 

The R&Rs further specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the 

R&Rs within fourteen days would result in a waiver of the right to de novo review 

by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgments of the 

Case: 2:12-cv-01138-MHW-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 10/01/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
District Court. Report and Recommendation 2, ECF No. 8. The deadline for 

filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed. 

Having received no objections, the R&Rs are ADOPTED, and the cases 

are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter judgment and 

terminate these cases. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

M'iCHAELH:WATSON, 

~/l!k JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

Case: 2:12-cv-01138-MHW-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 10/01/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Tank Car Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark J. Garrette, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In witness whereof, I have executed this certification as of the 11thday of August, 2008.



/s/ Mark J. GarretteMark J. GarrettePrincipal Financial Officer
cc: Hon. Jerome T. Tao, District Judge

Anthony Perry Oliver Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2

(0) I947A
# Official Journal C 284/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.284.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 284 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5520 September 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.284.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 284

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5520 September 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 284/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |
| 2012/C 284/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 284/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

2012/C 284/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

6

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 284/03 | Euro exchange rates | 11 |
| | NOTICES CONCERNING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA |
| | EFTA Surveillance Authority |
| 2012/C 284/04 | State aid — Decision to raise no objections | 12 |
| 2012/C 284/05 | State aid — Decision to raise no objections | 13 |
| 2012/C 284/06 | State aid — Decision to raise no objections | 14 |
| 2012/C 284/07 | Announcement from Norway concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons — Announcement of invitation to apply for petroleum production licences on the Norwegian Continental Shelf — 22nd licensing round | 15 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 284/03

Euro exchange rates

11

NOTICES CONCERNING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

EFTA Surveillance Authority

2012/C 284/04

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

12

2012/C 284/05

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

13

2012/C 284/06

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

14

2012/C 284/07

Announcement from Norway concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons — Announcement of invitation to apply for petroleum production licences on the Norwegian Continental Shelf — 22nd licensing round

15

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

MARK A. HILL, 

 

 Petitioner, 

 Case No. 2:11-cv-755 

 v. Judge Graham 

 Magistrate Judge King 

WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE 

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 

 Respondent. 

OPINION AND ORDER 

 On April 22, 2016, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Petitioner’s Rule 60(b)(6) 

and 60(d)(3) Motion for Relief from Judgment (“Petitioner’s Motion”), ECF No. 39, be denied. 

Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 42. Although the parties were advised of the right to 

object to the Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, 

no objections have been filed. 

 The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 42, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. 

Petitioner’s Motion, ECF No. 39, is DENIED. 

Date: May 13, 2016 

 _______s/James L. Graham_____ 

 James L. Graham 

 United States District Judge 

 

 

Case: 2:11-cv-00755-JLG-NMK Doc #: 43 Filed: 05/13/16 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Venice Jet Center, LLC 

Complainant 

City of Venice, Florida 

Respondent 

Docket No. 16-09-05 

ORDER 

In addition to the standard pleadings filed in accordance with 14 CFR Part 16 § jj.23, th ^ 

FAA has before it motions from the parties to the proceeding and a party seeking to 

intervene. 

Based on this and because it is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete 

determination in this case, the Director does hereby extend the time for further action in 

this proceeding. 

Accordingly, it is Ordered that: 

(1) No other pleadings or filings will be accepted from either party in this proceeding 

unless the Director specifically requests the documents; and 

(2) Pursuant to 14 CFR § 16.11(a), the Director hereby extends the time for further action 

to on or before April 2, 2010. 

FEB 2 5 21 

landall S. Fiertz 

Director, Office of Airport 

Compliance and Field Operations 

Date 

s^S^I-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on February 25, 2010 I caused to be placed in the United States mail 

(first class, postage paid) or personally delivered a true copy of the foregoing ORDER addressed to: 

Dominique Pearlman, Esq. 

WIAND GUERRA KING P.L. 

3000 Bayport Drive, Suite 600 

Tampa, PL 33607 

dpearlman(2>wiandlaw.com 

813-347-5109 (v) 

813-347-5199(0 

Richard L. Richards, Esq. 

RICHARDS & ASSOCIATES 

232 Andalusia Avenue, Suite 202 

Coral Gables, PL 33134 

rrichards(S),richpa.net 

305-448-2228 (v) 

305-448-2229 (f) 

Robert C. Anderson 

HALL & ANDERSON, P.A. 

1314 East Venice Avenue, Suite E 

Venice, FL 34285 

randerson@hall-anderson.com 

941-480-0999 (v) 

941-480-1446 (f) 

Thomas R. Devine 

W. Eric Pilsk 

KAPLAN KIRSCH & ROCKWELL LLP 

1001 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 800 

Washington, DC 20036 

tdevine@kaplankirsch.com 

epilsk@kaplankirsch.com 

202-955-5600 ext. 568 (v) 

202-955-5616 (f) 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

ACQ-100 

^MUn.. 

Office of Airport Compliance 

and Field Operations
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 871 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 

provide for the eligibility of Transportation Security Administration employees to receive public safety officers death benefits, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2023 

Ms. BROWNLEY (for herself and Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968 to provide for the eligibility of Transportation Security Administration employees to receive public safety officers death benefits, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honoring Our Fallen 

5 TSA Officers Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 871 IH

1 SEC. 2. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION EM2 PLOYEES ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE PUBLIC 

3 SAFETY OFFICERS’ DEATH BENEFITS. 

4 Section 1204(14) of the Omnibus Crime Control and 

5 Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10284(14)) is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (F), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

8 the end; 

9 (2) in subparagraph (G), by striking the period 

10 at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

11 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the fol12 lowing: 

13 ‘‘(H) an employee of the Transportation 

14 Security Administration who is performing offi15 cial duties of the Administration, if those offi16 cial duties are related to protecting the Nation’s 

17 transportation systems to ensure freedom of 

18 movement for people and commerce.’’. 

19 SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY. 

20 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

21 apply with respect an injury sustained by an individual 

22 described in subparagraph (H) of section 1204(14) of the 

23 Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 

24 U.S.C. 10284(14)), as added by this Act, on or after Octo25 ber 31, 2013. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
No. 51142.

Abstract 50980.

#### Protests 76423-K, etc., of Columbia Co. et al.

Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
**
Exhibit 31.1 

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function 

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

**CERTIFICATION**

I, KevinJ. Cullum, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2016-A Owner Trust(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. I amresponsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association 

Date: June 27, 2019 

 
By: 
/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofNissan Motor Acceptance Corporation(senior officer in charge of theservicing function)**
# C_2009005EN.01000201.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/2

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2009/C 5/02)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation are legal tender throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties involved who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 8 December 2003 (2), euro-area Member States and those countries that have concluded a Monetary Agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins intended for circulation are allowed to issue certain quantities of commemorative euro coins for circulation, on condition that not more than one new coin design is issued per country per year and that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the technical features of normal euro circulation coins, but bear a commemorative design on the national side.

1

2

Issuing country: Luxembourg

Subject of commemoration: The Grand-Duke Henri and the Grand-Duchess Charlotte

Description of the design: The coin depicts, on the left-hand side of its inner part, the effigy of His Royal Highness, the Grand-Duke Henri superimposed on the effigy of the Grand-Duchess Charlotte, both looking to the left. The vertically aligned text ‘LËTZEBUERG’ and the year ‘2009’, flanked by the Mintmaster's mark and the mintmark, appear on the right-hand side of the inner part of the coin.

The outer ring of the coin shows the twelve stars of the European flag.

Maximum number of coins to be issued: 1 400 000 coins

Approximate date of issue: January 2009

Edge lettering: 2 ★★, repeated six times, alternately upright and inverted.

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national sides of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Council (General Affairs) of 8 December 2003 on changes in the design of national sides of euro coins. See also the Commission Recommendation of 29 September 2003 on a common practice for changes to the design of national sides of euro circulation coins (OJ L 264, 15.10.2003, p. 38).

2

---
No. 48676.

#### Protests 630807-G, etc., of Western Sausage & Provision Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and the cited cases, the following allowances were made by the court to compensate for the foreign substances on the outside of certain cheese: (1) 2)4 percent for cheese similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 42146, and (2) 1 percent for that similar to the Reggiano cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States, supra.*Protests sustained to this extent.
(Reap. Dec. 8804)

#### CaRbons. Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 775218, etc.

(Decided May 15, 1957)

*Fred Bennett (Jordan & Klingaman,*associate counsel); for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court,

> 1. That the merchandise, the subject of the reappraisement appeals enumerated in the schedule hereto annexed and made a part hereof, consists of arc light carbons imported from France.

> 2. That the issues in the aforesaid appeals are the same in all material respects as those decided in *Bert Friedberg & Company*v. *United States,*R. D. 8590, and that the record in the said R. D. 8590 may be incorporated in the record in each of the aforesaid appeals.

> 3. That the appraised value of the merchandise in each of the aforesaid appeals, less 15.35 per cent, is equal to the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, and that, on or about the dates of exportation of the merchandise herein involved, merchandise such as or similar thereto was not sold or offered for sale in the .country of exportation for export to the United States.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the reappraisement appeals herein may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the appraised values, less 15.35 per centum.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.