alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### LARRY EDWARD HADICK, Fireman, U. S. Navy, Petitioner v COMMANDANT, First Naval District, U. S. Navy, 495 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts and COMMANDING OFFICER, Naval Station, Boston, Massachusetts, Respondents

18 USCMA 533, 40 CMR 245

Miscellaneous Docket No. 69-33

August 21, 1969

*Colonel C. R. Larouche,*USMC, and *Captain Charles E. Patterson,*USMCR, counsel for Respondents.

*534Memorandum Opinion of the Court

In his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, petitioner alleges that his term of enlistment in the United States Navy should have expired August 11, 1968. He was not discharged on that date. Rather, on August 13, 1968, he was placed in confinement and charges were subsequently preferred; trial and conviction followed; and his case is now pending review before the United States Navy Court of Military Review. He contends that since no action was taken by Naval authorities with a view to his trial by court-martial prior to the date of his enlistment termination, jurisdiction did not, and could not, attach.

In their response to this Court’s Order to Show Cause, respondents have established that petitioner was hospitalized from April 21 to June 6, 1968, for treatment of injuries. Competent authority has determined that these injuries were sustained not in line of duty but as the result of petitioner’s misconduct. As a result, his enlistment was extended to September 27, 1968, in accordance with 10 USC § 972 (5), which provides:

> “An enlisted member of an armed force who—

> 

> (5) is unable for more than one day, as determined by competent authority, to perform his duties because of intemperate use of drugs or alcoholic liquor, or because of disease or injury resulting from his misconduct;

> is liable, after his return to full duty, to serve for a period that, when added to the period that he served before his absence from duty, amounts to the term for which he was enlisted or inducted.”

In view of this extension, petitioner was at all pertinent times properly subject to military law. United States v Doherty, 10 USCMA 453, 28 CMR 19.

The petition is denied.
Case: 2:12-cv-00067-EAS-EPD Doc #: 24 Filed: 10/16/12 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00067-EAS-EPD Doc #: 24 Filed: 10/16/12 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T10:31:38-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# HOPE, Waging war on poverty; homeownership and opportunity for people everywhere

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  HOPE, Waging war on poverty; homeownership and opportunity for people everywhere 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of Housing and Urban Development 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. Department of Housing and Urban Development 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  024439623.jpg; 024439623.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136641 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136641 

 COA: 274264 

Washtenaw CC: 06-000479-FH 

ROBERT ESTER POWELL, III, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 17, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
Case No. 6,456.

#### The GIPSEY.

[Blatchf. Pr. Cas. 126.) 1

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

March, 1862.

Vessel and Cakgo Condemned — Blockade.

The vessel was pursued while attempting to violate the blockade. All on board of her escaped before she was taken. The court allowed other testimony to be given. Letters on board afforded a strong presumption that the vessel and cargo were enemy property. No claimant intervened: It not being probable that the papers of the vessel, or any of her crew, or any further proof could be produced, the court decreed condemnation of vessel and cargo, the vessel having been appraised and taken for the use of the government in the Gulf of Mexico, where she was captured, and not having been brought within this district.

BETTS, District Judge.

The yacht schooner Gipsey, and her cargo, on the 29th of December, 1861, pursued, in attempting to violate the blockade of New Orleans, by the United States vessel of war New London, the Wissakicon being also in sight. The officers and crew of the yacht escaped from her in their boat before she was taken possession of by the captors, and after setting fire to the prize. The cargo on board was sent by the captors to this port, and the vessel, being insufficient to make the voyage north, was appraised and taken possession of and fised by' the government. After the cargo arrived here the district attorney, on an affidavit of the facts, moved the court for and obtained an order that Thomas W. Jackson be examined upon the standing interrogatories by the prize commissioners, with the like effect as if he were one of the witnesses prescribed by law, subject to any objections that might be made to his competency or credit. The case being regularly set.down for hearing, and the proofs being clear that the yacht was seized in attempting to evade the blockade of the port of New Orleans, the strong presumption, from the written letters and memorada found on board the vessel, being that she and her lading were both enemy property, and no party intervening to claim the said prize, although due service of process of monition was made .according to the course in admiralty, and the impracticability of obtaining the regular papers of the vessel, or any members of her crew, to give evidence in the case, being made clear, and it not being probable that any 'further proofs of the transaction can be produced before the court, because of the impediment of natural and physical causes, it is considered by the court that sufficient authority is shown for the condemnation of the said vessel and her cargo as prize of war. Jecker v. Montgomery, 13 How. [54 U. S.] 515, 516. Judgment of forfeiture is accordingly given in favor of the libellants.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7378]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 041107B]


Endangered Species; File No. 1595

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; issuance of permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Michael M. Hastings, University of 
Maine, 5717 Corbett Hall, Orono, Maine 04469, has been issued a permit 
to take shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) for purposes of 
scientific research.

ADDRESSES: The permit and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following offices:
    Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 
20910; phone (301)713-2289; fax (301)427-2521; and
    Northeast Region, NMFS, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-
2298; phone (978)281-9300; fax (978)281-9394.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brandy Hutnak or Malcolm Mohead, 
(301)713-2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 16, 2007, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (72 FR 1706) that a request for a scientific 
research permit to take shortnose sturgeon had been submitted by the 
above-named individual. The requested permit has been issued under the 
authority of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 16 
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and the regulations governing the taking, 
importing, and exporting of endangered and threatened species (50 CFR 
parts 222-226).
    This permit authorizes Michael Hastings to annually capture, 
anesthetize, measure, weigh, sex (borescope), tissue sample, scan (for 
tags), Carlin tag, PIT tag, recover, and release up to 70 sub-adult and 
adult shortnose sturgeon annually. Additionally, up to 30 sub-adult and 
adult shortnose sturgeon, annually, would be fitted/implanted with an 
external/internal transmitter. This project also includes the annual 
lethal take of up to 50 shortnose sturgeon eggs. Up to 2 incidental 
mortalities of shortnose sturgeon each year is also being authorized. 
This research will help assess the distribution, abundance, and 
movements, as well as document spawning, of shortnose sturgeon in the 
Penobscot River System, Maine.
    Issuance of this permit, as required by the ESA, was based on a 
finding that such permit (1) was applied for in good faith, (2) will 
not operate to the disadvantage of such endangered or threatened 
species, and (3) is consistent with the purposes and policies set forth 
in section 2 of the ESA.

    Dated: April 11, 2007.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of 
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-7378 Filed 4-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE

 

 

I,Karen Montbach, a Managing Director of Citibank, N.A. (the “Company”), hereby certify, with respect to the Poolingand Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2016(the “Agreement”), by andamong Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, C-III Asset Management LLC, as special servicer, ParkBridge Lender Services LLC, asoperating advisor, Citibank, N.A., as certificate administrator (the“Certificate Administrator”), and WilmingtonTrust, National Association,as trustee, the following:

 

1.            A review of the Company’s activities as Certificate Administrator during thereporting period ending December 31, 2016 and its performance under theAgreement has been made under my supervision. 

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the reportingperiod ending December 31, 2016, the Company has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout thereporting period.

 

This statement is given by theundersigned as an authorized officer of the Company and not in theundersigned’s individual capacity.

 

 

Date:       February 27, 2017

 

Citibank, N.A.

 

 

By: /s/ Karen Montbach

Name: Karen Montbach

Title: Managing Director

 

 

CGCMT 2016-P3
Exhibit 32.1

SUNLINK HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SunLink Health Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert M. Thornton, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Robert M. Thornton, Jr.Robert M. Thornton, Jr.Chief Executive Officer


February 14, 2007



37
##### 



Exhibit 31.3
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Toreador Resources Corporation;(2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;(3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operation and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;(4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 (5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
 Date: November 10, 2005/s/ Charles J. CampiseCharles J. Campise
Vice President-Accounting and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION OF 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Industries, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2004 (the Report), I, Melvin G. Brekhus, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: January 7, 2005 |  | /s/ M. G. Brekhus                    
|                       |  | Melvin G. Brekhus                    
|                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Texas Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Texas Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 51159.

#### Protests 57374-K, etc., of A. C. Pecora et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decisions cited the following allowances were made to compensate for the weight of the inedible substance on the outside of the cheese: (1) 2J4 percent for the cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), Abstract 42146, and Abstract 48269; and (2) 1 percent for the cheese similar to the Reggiano cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States, supra.*The protests were sustained to this extent.
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Ian Bangs, Chief Financial Officer of Prima BioMed Ltd, (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended June 30, 2012, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 13.2 (the Annual
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 3, 2012



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Ian Bangs          
|Ian Bangs              
|Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 20-F to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Prima BioMed Ltd under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 20-F),
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 14

- 12955 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:13

- cr - 00282

- CG

- B

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

– Appell ee,

ve rsus LARRY GENE BROADNAX, Defe ndant

– Appell ant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama

________________________ (February 10, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, HULL, and ROSENBAUM , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Appellant Larry Broadnax pled guilty to the offense of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and the District

Case: 14-12955 Date Filed: 02/10/2015 Page: 1 of 32 Court sentenced him to a prison term of 120 months, the maximum term prescribed by statute. 1 He appeals his sentence, arguing that the Dis trict Court, in determining this total offense level under the Sentencing Guidelines, erred (1) in applying U.S.S.G. § 2A3.1(a)(2) as the base offense level on a finding that he possessed a firearm while involved in the commission of an act of sexual abuse , and (2) in failing to apply U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a) to reduce his total offense level for acceptance of responsibility. We affirm. The salient facts are these. On April 30, 2013, the Mobile County, Alabama, Sheriff’s Office responded to a home invasion. They found two males in the front yard of the house suffering from injuries. One of the males said that a black sedan containing four men had pulled into the front yard. The men got out, and after one of them struck him in the face with a shotgun, three of the men entered the house. One stayed outside. Charles Campbell, who was inside the house, told the officers that the man who remained outside was his cousin, Larry Broadnax, the appellant. Campbell said that once inside, the three men forced the occ upants of the house to remove their clothes. Then, one of the men took a female occupant into a bedroom, raped her , and made her perform oral sex.

1 See 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2). Case: 14-12955 Date Filed: 02/10/2015 Page: 2 of 33 The police subsequently caught Broadnax driving the black sedan the four men had used. He consented to a search of the car. In the trunk were two shotguns and the cellphone of one of the victim s . We find no merit to Broadnax’s appeal. Even if we were to assume that the court erred in determining the total offense level as Broadnax contends, the vacation of his sentence and remand for resentencing would be unnecessary because the District Court emphatically stated du ring the sentencing hearing that, assuming such error, it would have imposed the same 120 months sentence it handed down. See United States v. Keen , 470 F.3d 1347, 134 8

– 49 (11th Cir. 2006). The court made the statement after taking fully into account the purposes of sentencing set out in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to wit: the seriousness of the offense and the need for just punishment, the need to deter others from committing the offense,
and the need to incarcerate Broadnax to protect the public.
AFFIRMED. Case: 14-12955 Date Filed: 02/10/2015 Page: 3 of 3