alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 5, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. AMOUNTS HAVE BEEN RESTATED TO INCLUDE
THE JULY 2, 1998 ACQUISITION OF TELECOMMUNICATION DEVICES, INC., ACCOUNTED FOR
AS A POOLING OF INTERESTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-05-1998
<CASH>                                          60,254
<SECURITIES>                                    51,692
<RECEIVABLES>                                  325,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (41,177)
<INVENTORY>                                    429,919
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               877,723
<PP&E>                                       1,106,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                 520,737
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,136,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          406,129
<BONDS>                                        585,831
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,024,005
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,136,321
<SALES>                                        544,656
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               544,656
<CGS>                                          381,314
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (8,985)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,752
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,449
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,303
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,303
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65
        

</TABLE>
## **Exhibit32.2**

**Certification of Chief FinancialOfficer**

**of Tipperary Corporation  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350**

 

 

                In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tipperary Corporation (the “*Company*”) for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “*Report*”), I, Joseph B. Feiten, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge:

 

1.                                       the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

2.                                       the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   |   |   |   | /s/  Joseph B. Feiten |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------|
|   |   |   |   |   | Name:                 | Joseph B. Feiten |
|   |   |   |   |   | Title:                | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   |   |   |   | Date:                 | November 15, 2004 |

 

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

TINA MARIE McGUIRE, : 

 : 

 Plaintiff, : Case No. 2:12-cv-01084 

 : 

 vs. : JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 : 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, : 

 : Magistrate Judge Abel 

 Defendant. : 

OPINION AND ORDER 

On September 10, 2013 the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and 

Recommendation in this case (Doc. 17), recommending that this Court affirm the decision of 

the Commissioner, denying Plaintiff’s application for Supplemental Security Income benefits. 

The parties were specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation 

and of the consequences of their failure to do so. (Id. at 26-27). No objections have been filed. 

 Since neither party has objected, and deadline for such objections elapsed on September 

24, 2013, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. The 

decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is hereby AFFIRMED. This case is hereby 

DISMISSED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/ Algenon L. Marbley s 

 ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

DATED: October 15, 2013 

Case: 2:12-cv-01084-ALM-MRA Doc #: 18 Filed: 10/15/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 39023.

#### Protests 660422-G, etc., of Dritz Traum Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the bottles and powder jars in question were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339.
Order entered October 17 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 01404
- CV IN RE RONALD NEWTON, Relator Original Proceeding from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 13
- 1181 8 

### O RDER Based on the Court’s opinion of today’s date, we DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of mandamus in part and DENY it in part

. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
APPENDIX A-5 

AUTOTRANSFORMER LOCATION MAPS 

AND TYPICAL FOOTPRINT 


...\DessestX\AT-Plans\AT-3B.dgn 6/28/2007 3:55:15 PM








...\AT-11.dgn 7/16/2007 8:15:32 AM

...\AT-13A.dgn 7/16/2007 8:18:39 AM
FRA 01-24

January 25, 2024

Contact: FRA Public Affairs

Tel.: (202) 493-6024 

FRAPA@DOT.gov

Federal Railroad Administration Issues Final Rule Requiring Emergency Escape 

Breathing Apparatuses in Trains Carrying Hazmat

After Norfolk Southern derailment in East Palestine, Rule strengthens worker safety by requiring 

railroads to provide protective gear for neck and face coverage with respiratory protection 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) today announced a final rule to 

improve employee safety on freight trains transporting hazardous materials. The rule requires railroads 

to provide emergency escape breathing apparatuses (EEBAs) for train crew members and other 

employees who could be exposed to an inhalation hazard in the event of a hazardous material, or 

hazmat, release. Railroads must also ensure that the equipment is maintained and in proper working 

condition and train their employees in its use. This rule was advanced after the Norfolk Southern 

derailment in East Palestine.

“As FRA continues to advance rail safety and address concerns related to the transportation of 

hazardous materials, this new rule will implement needed protections for the workers who transport 

these products around the country,” said FRA Administrator Amit Bose. “The safety needs and 

benefits of EEBAs have long been established by past tragedies and research, and this rule will provide 

rail employees with the knowledge and tools to minimize potential dangers.” 

Although casualties and fatalities caused by inhalation of hazmat are rare, train crew fatalities in 2004 

and 2005 resulting from chlorine gas inhalation demonstrated that employee protections are necessary. 

The final rule fulfills the mandate in the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 that FRA issue 

regulations requiring railroads to provide EEBAs and training in their use. The rule also addresses 

similar recommendations made by the National Transportation Safety Board. 

As part of this final rule, FRA conducted a Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA), which presents estimates 

of the costs likely to occur over the first 10 years of industry’s compliance with the final rule. The RIA 

will help facilitate railroads’ implementation of the rule’s requirements for EEBAs. As part of the 

benefits of the new rule, the analysis finds that in addition to heightened safety and the prevention of 

U.S Department of Transportation

Office of Public Affairs

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

www.transportation.gov/briefingroom 

News
injuries for covered employees, it will allow for earlier public notification in the event of hazmat 

releases.

The final rule on Emergency Escape Breathing Apparatus Standards is on public inspection in the 

Federal Register here and will be published tomorrow.

###
Case No. 16,196.

#### UNITED STATES v. GEE.

[2 Cranch. C. C. 163.]1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

April Term, 1819.

Jury—Peremptory Challenge.

Upoo an indictment for larceny, in Alexandria, D. C., the prisoner is entitled to a peremptory challenge

Indictment [against Thomas Gee] for stealing the money of James H. Caldwell.

1

 [Reported by Hou William Craneh, Chief Judge.]

THE COURT

decided that the prisoner was entitled to a peremptory challenge. Laws Va. Not. 13, 1792, p. 103, § 8.
No. 56101.

protests 172271-K, etc. (New York).

#### The Amscan Company et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6715]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 040507D]


New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is 
scheduling a public meeting of its Ad Hoc Sector Omnibus Committee 
(Committee) in April, 2007, to consider actions affecting New England 
fisheries in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Recommendations from 
this group will be brought to the full Council for formal consideration 
and action, if appropriate.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, April 26, 2007, at 9:30 
a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Sheraton Ferncroft, 50 
Ferncroft Road, Danvers, MA 01923; telephone: (978) 777-2500; fax: 
(978) 750-7959.
    Council address: New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water 
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, 
New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465-0492.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Committee will continue development of 
sector programs and operational guidelines addressing the specific 
terms of reference issues provided by the Council.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising 
after publication of this notice that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public has 
been notified of the Council's intent to take final action to address 
the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, at (978) 465-
0492, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: April 5, 2007.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-6715 Filed 4-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
Case: 2:11-cv-00994-EAS-NMK Doc #: 25 Filed: 06/07/12 Page: 1 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00994-EAS-NMK Doc #: 25 Filed: 06/07/12 Page: 2 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00994-EAS-NMK Doc #: 25 Filed: 06/07/12 Page: 3 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00994-EAS-NMK Doc #: 25 Filed: 06/07/12 Page: 4 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00994-EAS-NMK Doc #: 25 Filed: 06/07/12 Page: 5 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00994-EAS-NMK Doc #: 25 Filed: 06/07/12 Page: 6 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00994-EAS-NMK Doc #: 25 Filed: 06/07/12 Page: 7 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T15:26:48-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 95 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 95

   Expressing the sense of Congress with regard to the importance of 
 Women's Health Week, which promotes awareness of diseases that affect 
women and which encourages women to take preventive measures to ensure 
                              good health.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2006

   Mr. Feingold (for himself and Ms. Snowe) submitted the following 
 concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of Congress with regard to the importance of 
 Women's Health Week, which promotes awareness of diseases that affect 
women and which encourages women to take preventive measures to ensure 
                              good health.

Whereas women of all backgrounds have the power to greatly reduce their risk of 
        common diseases through preventive measures such as a healthy lifestyle 
        and frequent medical screenings;
Whereas significant disparities exist in the prevalence of disease among women 
        of different backgrounds, including women with disabilities, African 
        American women, Asian/Pacific Islander women, Latinas, and American 
        Indian/Alaska Native women;
Whereas since healthy habits should begin at a young age, and preventive care 
        saves Federal dollars designated to health care, it is important to 
        raise awareness among women and girls of key female health issues;
Whereas National Women's Health Week begins on Mother's Day annually and 
        celebrates the efforts of national and community organizations working 
        with partners and volunteers to improve awareness of key women's health 
        issues; and
Whereas in 2006, the week of May 14 through May 20, is dedicated as the National 
        Women's Health Week: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) recognizes the importance of preventing diseases that 
        commonly affect women;
            (2) calls on the people of the United States to use Women's 
        Health Week as an opportunity to learn about health issues that 
        face women;
            (3) calls on the women of the United States to observe 
        National Women's Check-Up Day on Monday, May 15, 2006, by 
        receiving preventive screenings from their health care 
        providers; and
            (4) recognizes the importance of federally funded programs 
        that provide research and collect data on common diseases in 
        women and highlight racial disparities in the rates of these 
        diseases.
                                 <all>
```
(Reap. Dec. 9344)

#### Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 820301; 873140.

(Decided March 11, 1959)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been sub-

mitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in Schedule A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, was exported from Japan.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the date of exportation of such merchandise to the United States the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets from the country in which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, was the net invoice price, packing included.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or. about the date of exportation such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for consumption in the country of exportation.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals for re-appraisement set forth in Schedule A may be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the net invoice prices, packing included.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### United States *v.*Lunham & Reeve, Inc. Lunham & Reeve, Inc., Thermal Syndicate, Ltd. *v.*United States and United States *v.*Lunham & Reeve, Inc.

No. 7568.

Entry Nos. 739315, etc.; 734999/1/3, etc.

Invoices dated Newcastle on Tyne, England, January 17, 1946, etc.

Certified January 17, 1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 18, 1946, etc.

*409(Decided March 22, 1948)

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the United States.

*Jordan & Klingaman■ {Jacob L. Klingaman*of counsel) for the importers.

Olivee, Presiding Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of- counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed between counsel, as to the appeals enumerated in the annexed schedule, subject to the approval of the court:

> (1) That the prices at the time of exportation to the United States, at which such merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of England, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were as follows:

> (a) Items marked A in green ink on the invoices and checked H. G. by Examiner Golub, the entered units of value plus 25 per cent less 2)4 per cent plus packing and boxes.

> (b) Items marked B in green ink on the invoices and checked H. G. by Examiner Golub, the entered unit values plus 10 per cent less 2)4 per cent plus packing and boxes.

> (c) Items marked C in green ink on the invoices and checked H. G. by Examiner Golub, the entered unit values less 2)4 per cent plus packing and boxes.

> (d) In the case of all other items, the appraised values.

> (2) That there was no higher export value for any of the involved merchandise.

> (3) That the appeals may be submitted. .

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are as follows:

As to the items marked “A” in green ink on the invoices and checked H. G. by Examiner Golub, the entered units of value, plus 25 per centum, less *2){*per centum, plus packing and boxes.

As to the items marked “B” in green ink on the invoices and checked H. G. by Examiner Golub, the entered unit values, plus 10 per centum, less *2}i*per centum, plus packing and boxes.

As to the items marked “C” in green ink on the invoices and checked H. G. by Examiner Golub, the entered unit values, less 2)4 per centum, plus packing and boxes.

As to all other merchandise involved, the appraised values.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Case No. 6,469.

#### GLADSTONE et al. v. CHAMBERLAIN et al.

[1 Am. Law Rev. 587.]

Circuit Court. S. D. New York.

1867.

Payment “in Case Construction’ or Contract —Usage.

[The question whether a written contract, made at Ceylon, to pay “in cash” for goods deliverable at New York, means a payment in specie, — gold or silver, — is one of intention; but the intention is to be reached by the court from the terms of the contract, either as the words themselves import, or as they are explained by local custom, or usage,]

[This was a suit *on*a' charter party by ■ Lawrence Gladstone and others against William Chamberlain and others. See Case No. 5,471.]

NELSON, Circuit Justice.

The real question in this case is embraced under the Issue presented by the second plea, and to which there is a demurrer. That question is, whether or not the contract at the island of Ceylon, in the charter party, to pay for goods deliverable at New York, “in cash.” means a payment in specie, — gold or silver. My opinion is, if that is the true interpretation of the agreement, then the libellants are entitled to specie, or its equivalent in New York. The question does *not*turn upon the intention of the parties outside of the terms or words of the agreement: they are to be interpreted by the court; and such conclusion is to be arrived at as the words themselves import, or as the words, explained by local custom or usage, import.

There is another difficulty arising out of the second plea, and that is as to the effect of the payment and acceptance as averred therein. To disembarrass the case from the pleadings, and enable the parties to present the real question to the court, we shall.give judgment in favor of the darnur-.rer, and against the special plea, leaving the case to be tried on the general issue, when the meaning of the phrase “to be paid in cash” may be explained by the usage and custom of the trade, if any such custom or usage exists.

[See Case No. 5,470.]