alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo)**Prudential**

**PrudentialAsset Resources**

PGIMReal Estate Finance

2100Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201

Tel214-777-4500

 

Abusiness of Prudential Financial, Inc.

 

 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association

CommercialMortgage Servicing

2010Corporate Ridge

10thFloor, Ste 1000

McLean,Virginia 22102-7853

Attention:Asset Manager

 

RE:         **CFCRE 2016 - C3**

Period: **January 1, 2018 to December 31,2018(the "Reporting Period")**

 

 

**Annual ComplianceStatement**

 

I, Joni Brown-Haas, in my capacity asPresident and Managing Director of Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the"Company") hereby certify with regard to the Company's role asSub-Servicer under the Sub-Servicing Agreement, (the "Agreement")dated as of January 1, 2016, pertaining to the above-referenced certificates,that:

 

       (i)           areview of the activities of the Company under the Agreement  during theperiod noted above, and  of the performance of the Company under theAgreement during the  relevant  period  has been made under mysupervision, and

 

     (ii)           tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled allits obligations under the Agreement throughout the relevant period, and

 

   (iii)           tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled itsobligations under its sub-servicing agreement in all material respects, and

 

    (iv)           theCompany has maintained an effective internal control system over the servicingof mortgage loans including the Loans serviced by the Company, and

 

     (v)           theCompany has not received any notice regarding qualification, or challenging thestatus of the Lower Tier REMIC or the Upper Tier REMIC as a REMIC, from the IRSor any other governmental agency or body.

 

Effectiveas of February 22, 2019

 

 

/s/Joni Brown-Haas

JoniBrown-Haas

Presidentand Managing Director

PrudentialAsset Resources, Inc.
**EXHIBIT31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, H. James Serrone, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Torotel, Inc.

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)      designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

 

b)      evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 daysprior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)      presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)      all significant deficiencies in thedesign or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial dataand have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses ininternal controls; and

 

b)      any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterlyreport whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| /s/   H. James Serrone |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|

 

 

H. James SerroneChief Financial OfficerMarch 30, 2005

 

----
Exhibit (31)-2**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Richard D. Rodekohr, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Transcontinental Gas Pipe LineCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 4, 2005     By: /s/ Richard D. Rodekohr         Richard D. Rodekohr
#### Inhabitants of Winterport *versus*Inhabitants of Frankfort.

When part of a town is set off and incorporated into a new town, and no provision is made in the act for the support of such paupers in the old town as have no settlement in the State, they must be supported by the town in which they are, -when the support is given, and no action can be maintained by one of the towns against the other for reimbursement.

On agreed statement. Assumpsit to recover money expended in support of one Doyle, who, it was agreed, had no legal settlement in the State, but before and at the time of the division of the old. town of Frankfort was supported by it, at the town farm, which is in the plaintiff town.

*JST. II. Hubbard,*for plaintiffs.

Before the division, Frankfort was under legal obligation to support this pauper, and no change was made in this respect by the Act of incorporation.

*W. Q. Crosby,*for defendants.

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Appleton, C. J.

The town of Winterport was incorporated out of part of the town of Frankfort.

*448The liabilities of these towns for the support of paupers must be decided by the general pauper law of the State, or by the special Act creating the new town. They are not liable at common law.

The plaintiffs cannot recover under the general law relating to paupers, because it is conceded that the pauper Doyle had no settlement in the defendant town.

The plaintiffs cannot recover under the Act of 1860, c. 422, incorporating the town of Winterport, — because the obligation thereafter to support those now chargeable as paupers Mi Frankfort, and not having a settlement therein, is not specially imposed on the defendant town.

The Act, c. 422, § 3, so far as it relates to paupers, is in these words, — "the .inhabitants of Winterport shall support all persons now chargeable as paupers in Frankfort, whose legal settlement is within the limits of Winterport; and all persons hereafter becoming chargeable shall belong to that town, in the territory of which they shall then have their legal settlement, whether direct or derivative.”

It will be perceived, that, as between these towns, the obligation of providing for those situated similarly to the pauper in question is not théreby imposed upon either town. The plaintiff town has no better right to recover of the defendants than would any other town have, in which she might receive support. That is, the defendant town is not liable, because the pauper has no settlement therein. *Holden*v. *Brewer,*38 Maine, 472. This must be regarded as a *casus omissus,*for which no provision has been made in the Act of incorporation, though it is otherwise in some of the Acts of incorporation cited by the counsel for the defendants. *Action to stand for trial.*

Cutting, Kent, Walton, Barrows and Daneorth, JJ., concurred.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Huntington National Bank,

Plaintiff

 v.

Gushard, Wilburn & Shorts, et al.,

Defendants

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action 2:12-cv-01035

Judge Marbley

Magistrate Judge Abel

ORDER

Plaintiff The Huntington National Bank’s July 30, 2013 motion to stay the

discovery deadlines (doc. 48) is GRANTED. This Court will reset the discovery

deadlines after resolution of the motion for judgment on the pleadings, if necessary.

s/Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case: 2:12-cv-01035-ALM-MRA Doc #: 49 Filed: 07/31/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 39017.

#### Protest 158669-G of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items consist of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230.. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
1

CY 2024 FRA Discretionary Grant Calendar

FY23-24 CRISI

FY23-24 RCE

FY24 FSP-NEC

FY24 FSPNational

FY21-24 R&E 

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr

2024 2025

NOFO CYCLE STAGES ARE ESTIMATED FOR PLANNING PURPOSES, AND NOT EXACT DURATIONS OR DATES. CHANGES MAY OCCUR, AND FRA WILL UPDATE ACCORDINGLY.

75 DAYS

75 DAYS

75 DAYS

60 DAYS

NOFO Publication Application Period Evaluation & Selection Period Award Announcement

60 DAYS
Boise Paper 400 Second Street, International Falls, MN 56649 T218.285.5664 F208.331.5n3 November 28, 2011 Mr. Dennis J. DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Office ofAviation Analysis U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue SE Washington, D.C. 20590 Dear Mr. DeVany: 

# •

On behalf of Boise Inc. and the 850 employees at our International Falls paper mill, I am writing in strong support ofthe federal Essential Air Service (EAS} program that maintains service to our community. With the recent announcement by Delta Airlines to terminate service to the International Falls airport, the case for protecting EAS is significantly reinforced. Air service is the only means of public transportation to and from our community and is essential to the growth and development of our business. Air service is particularly important as we serve our customer needs. Technical service representatives must be able to respond in a timely manner to customer concerns. Driving to another community would add an additional day to our response time, put us at a competitive disadvantage, and could potentially cause the loss of customers that are so critical to our economic vitality. Also imperative is supplier response time. When experiencing operational difficulties, time is ofthe essence. If suppliers experience additional travel time, it would cause additional hours of lost productivity and could be the difference in meeting important customer delivery requirements. In addition, we use air service as a selling pointwhen recruiting employees. It is difficult to attract those without ties to our remote location and would be even more so without this critical transportation service. We will whole-heartedly support the airline that replaces Delta and ask that you continue to consider the small communities in Minnesota that economically cannot afford to be without air service.

Bert Brown Mill Manager

### Page 2 November 28, 2011

xc: Falls Airport Commission International Falls City Council Koochiching County Board of Commissioners Pete Makowski, Office of SenatorAI Franken Jerry Fallos, Office of SenatorAmy Klobuchar Alisa Rossini, Office of Representative Chip Cravaack

Essential Air Service - Dayton
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 714/2006

of 10 May 2006         

amending Regulation (EC) No 1164/2005 as regards the quantity covered by the standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of maize held by the Polish intervention agency

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 1164/2005 is hereby amended as follows:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 May 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 188, 20.7.2005, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1989/2005 (OJ L 320, 8.12.2005, p. 22).

----
# C_2007297EN.01001001.xml

| 8.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 October 2007 — Henkel KGaA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-144/06 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(1)(b) - Refusal to register - Figurative mark - Representation of a red and white rectangular tablet with an oval blue centre - Distinctive character)

(2007/C 297/14)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Henkel KGaA (represented by: C. Osterrieth, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 17 January 2006 in Case T-398/04 Henkel KGaA v OHIM, in which the Court of First Instance rejected the application for annulment of the decision to refuse the registration of a three-dimensional mark for detergent products in the form of a red and white rectangular tablet with an oval blue centre — Three-dimensional mark consisting of the shape of the product — Distinctive character of the mark

Henkel KGaA

OHIM

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2) | Orders Henkel KGaA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Henkel KGaA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 121, 20.5.2006.

1

---
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# You could save up to $546 a year in medicare expenses medicare & you, the knowledge to make good decisions

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  You could save up to $546 a year in medicare expenses medicare & you, the knowledge to make good decisions 
                    -           Alternative Title        
                    -  Savings for medicare beneficiaries; Medicare & you, the knowledge to make good decisions 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of Health and Human Services 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. Department of Health and Human Services 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  2000-2010 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 43 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  045077824.jpg; 045077824.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
#### W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7408.

Invoice dated Stoke on Trent, England, October 1945.

Certified November 1945.

Entered at New York, N. Y., January 11, 1946.

Entry No. 732747.

(Decided October 15, 1947)

*Lane & Wallace*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has^been^submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

¡^Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 1 AND 2 OF
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,478
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,760
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,448
<PP&E>                                          37,067
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,819
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  58,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,326
<BONDS>                                         17,966
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           483
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,179
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,316
<SALES>                                          5,935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,935
<CGS>                                            2,743
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,909
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    17
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,002
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    139
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                139
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       139
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00




</TABLE>
#### Wm. L. Bane & Co. *v.*United States

No. 7536.

Entry No. 743487.

Invoice dated Longton, England, January 1946.

Certified January 25, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 8, 1946.

(Decided February 10, 1948)

*Sharretts*& *Iiillis (Howard C. Carter*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This proceeding has been submitted upon a stipulation wherein the parties hereto have agreed that the issues involved in this reappraisement are the same in all material respects as in the case of *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334. The record in that case was admitted as part of the record herein.

In view of the aforesaid stipulation and accepting same as a statement of fact, and in view of the decision cited, I find and hold that the export value of the merchandise is the value found by the appraiser, less any additions on entry by the importer by reason of advances by the appraiser in similar cases to equal the so-called British purchase tax.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.