alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.3





 Exhibit 4.3 

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO THE 

EIGHTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF 

FLUIDIGM CORPORATION 

Fluidigm Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware (the “Corporation”), hereby certifies that: 
 1. The name of the Corporation is Fluidigm Corporation. The
Corporation’s original Certificate of Incorporation was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on March 29, 2007. 

2. Article I of the Eighth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, as amended, is hereby amended and restated to
read in its entirety as follows: 
 “The name of the Corporation is Standard BioTools Inc. (the
“Corporation”).”
 3. Section 1 of Article IV of the Eighth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation, as amended, is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: 
 “Section 1. This Corporation is
authorized to issue two classes of stock, to be designated, respectively, Common Stock and Preferred Stock. The total number of shares of stock that the Corporation shall have authority to issue is four hundred ten million (410,000,000) shares,
of which four hundred million (400,000,000) shares are Common Stock, $0.001 par value, and ten million (10,000,000) shares are Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value.” 

4. This Certificate of Amendment to the Corporation’s Eighth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, has been duly
authorized and adopted by the Corporation’s Board of Directors in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, and has been duly approved by the stockholders of the Corporation at a meeting of the
stockholders on April 1, 2022, in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 












 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Fluidigm Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be
signed by its Chief Executive Officer this 1st day of April, 2022. 
  

	
	 /s/ Vikram Jog

	Name: Vikram Jog
	Title: Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

The following written statement accompanies the issuers Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q and is not filed as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8212, 34-47551
and IC-25967, dated March 21, 2003.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Richard D. Rodekohr, Vice President and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Richard D. Rodekohr
Richard D. Rodekohr
Vice President and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
May 13, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# .{^OFALToo ^

Departmen t o f Administratio n 130 1 Twelft h Stire t Suit e 10 0 Altoona , P A1660 1 (814 ) 04»-24a e fa x(614 ) Mt-241 1 Apri l 20 , 201 0 e mail : council@altoonapa.go v website : www.altoonapa.qo v 

## OoT-osT-aoos-U^MC

. MAYO R Willia m Schir f

COUNCI L MEMBER S Davi d Bulteitaug h Eri k Cagl e Mari s Gel s Bnic e Kelle y Ja n Mills , Sr

. Willia m Neugebaue r Mr

. Denni s J

. DeVany , Chie f Essentia l Ai rServic e Divisio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s U.S

. Departmen t o fTransportatio n Offic e o fth e Secretar yo fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Washington , D C 0259 0 RE : Suppor t fo rth e Altoona-Blai rCount yAirpor t Authorit yt o Recommen d Colga n Ai r Dea rMr

. DeVany : Pleas e accep t thi s lette ri n suppor t o f th e Altoona-Blai rCount yAirpor t Authority' s recommendatio n tha t Colga n Air , Inc. , operatin g a s Unite d Express , continu e t o serv e a s operato ro f essentia l ai rservic e a t th e Altoona Blai rCount yAirport

. Th e Washington , D C Dulle s servic e offere d b yColga n Air/Unite d Expres s i s a popula rconnectio n fo rman yo f ou rresident s an d busines s people

. Colga n als o offer s dependable , saf e an d affordabl e ai rtransportatio n a t th e Altoona Blai rCount yAirpor t facility

. Therefore , w e suppor t th e retentio n o f Colga n Air/Unite d Expres s an d loo k forwar d t o thei rcontinue d qualit yai rservic e t o th e Altoona-Blai rCount y Airpor t an d th e resident s o fth e Cit yo f Altoona

. Sincerely ,
Willia m Schirf , Mayo r Cit yo fAltoon a

Printe do nRecycle dPape r
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 219 

Designating March 8, 2006, as ‘‘Endangered Species Day’’, and encouraging 

the people of the United States to become educated about, and aware 

of, threats to species, success stories in species recovery, and the opportunity to promote species conservation worldwide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 28, 2005 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mr. CHAFEE, Mrs. CLINTON, and Mr. CRAPO) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating March 8, 2006, as ‘‘Endangered Species Day’’, 

and encouraging the people of the United States to become educated about, and aware of, threats to species, 

success stories in species recovery, and the opportunity 

to promote species conservation worldwide. 

Whereas in the United States and around the world, more 

than 1,000 species are officially designated as at risk of 

extinction and thousands more also face a heightened 

risk of extinction; 

Whereas the actual and potential benefits derived from many 

species have not yet been fully discovered and would be 

permanently lost if not for conservation efforts; 
2 

•SRES 219 IS

Whereas recovery efforts for species such as the whooping 

crane, Kirtland’s warbler, the peregrine falcon, the gray 

wolf, the gray whale, the grizzly bear, and others have resulted in great improvements in the viability of such species; 

Whereas saving a species requires a combination of sound research, careful coordination, and intensive management 

of conservation efforts, along with increased public 

awareness and education; and 

Whereas education and increasing public awareness are the 

first steps in effectively informing the public about endangered species and species restoration efforts: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates March 8, 2006, as ‘‘Endangered 

3 Species Day’’; and 

4 (2) encourages— 

5 (A) educational entities to spend at least 

6 30 minutes on ‘‘Endangered Species Day’’ 

7 teaching and informing students about threats 

8 to, and the restoration of, endangered species 

9 around the world; 

10 (B) organizations, businesses, and agencies 

11 with a shared interest in conserving endangered 

12 species to collaborate on educational informa13 tion for use in schools; and 
3 

•SRES 219 IS

1 (C) the people of the United States to ob2 serve the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

3 activities. 

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Nexlink Communication, LLC,

Plaintiff

 v.

Nick Glassburn, et al.,

Defendants

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action 2:12-mc-00047

Judge Graham

Magistrate Judge Abel

ORDER

This matter is before the Magistrate Judge on plaintiff’s Nexlink Communication,

LLC’s (“Nexlink”) unopposed February 7, 2013 motion to compel (doc. 4).

Nexlink is the holder of default judgments against defendants in the amount of

$101,189.91. On December 20, 2012, Nexlink subpoenaed defendants related to the

underlying default judgments and their finances and assets. Nexlink maintains that the

supoenas were properly served on December 21, 2012. 

Nexlink seeks an order pursuant to Rule 45(c)(2)(B)(i), Fed. R. Civ. P. compelling

defendants to produce the documents sought in the subpoenas. Defendants failed to

produce the documents. Defendants have also failed to file a motion to quash or modify

the subpoenas under Rule 45(c)(3). Nexlink also asks that the Court require defendants

to pay their attorney fees incurred in filing this motion. 

1

Case: 2:12-mc-00047-JLG-NMK Doc #: 5 Filed: 03/07/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Plaintiff’s Nexlink Communication, LLC’s (“Nexlink”) unopposed February 7,

2013 motion to compel (doc. 4) is GRANTED. Defendants Nick Glassburn and Tower

Wireless, Ltd. are ORDERED to produce the documents or electronically stored

information listed in Exhibit A of the subpoenas and permit their inspection or copying

within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order

will place defendants in contempt of court. 

Plaintiff is entitled to award of its attorney fees incurred in bringing its motion to

compel. Plaintiff is ORDERED to submit an itemized statement of such costs and fees

and supporting memorandum within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order.

Thereafter, defendants may file a brief in opposition within seven (7) days of the date of

service of plaintiff’s statement and supporting memorandum.

Under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A), Rule 72(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., and

Eastern Division Order No. 91-3, pt. F, 5, either party may, within fourteen (14) days

after this Order is filed, file and serve on the opposing party a motion for

reconsideration by the District Judge. The motion must specifically designate the

Order, or part thereof, in question and the basis for any objection thereto. The District

Judge, upon consideration of the motion, shall set aside any part of this Order found to

be clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

s/Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge

2

Case: 2:12-mc-00047-JLG-NMK Doc #: 5 Filed: 03/07/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Appendix H

Design Drawings
Typical Cross Section
10’ ACCESS ROAD

 9’

14’

(TYP)

10’ ACCESS ROAD

 9’

14’

(TYP)

* ALSO SEE END SECTION DETAILS

* ALSO SEE END SECTION DETAILS

TYPICAL TRACK SECTION - C

2%

1:10

3:1

3:1

3:1

(+/-)

MIN 12" BALLAST

12" SUBBALLAST

~

START STA *

@ 20-FT OFFSET

PROPOSED SUBGRADE

3.42’T/R TO TOP OF 

CL MAIN TRACK 1 (EXIST) CL PROP MAIN TRACK 2

PROP SUBGRADE

(TYP)

5.75’

9’

20’

10993+00.00 11062+77.38

END STA *

10868+94.54 10993+00.00

10848+53.41 10868+94.54

12" SUBBALLAST

12" SUBBALLAST

2%

C

3:1

3:1

SEE END SECTIONS

(+/-)

@ 20-FT OFFSET

PROPOSED SUBGRADE

MIN 12" BALLAST T/R TO TOP OF 

12" SUBBALLAST

3

~

:1

C

PROP SUBGRADE

(TYP)

17’ VARIES 0’ TO 20 ’

5.75’

TYPICAL TRACK SECTION - B

2%

1:10

3:1

3:1

3:1

SEE END SECTIONS

(+/-)

MIN 12" BALLAST

12" SUBBALLAST

3

~

:1

START STA *

* ALSO SEE END SECTION DETAILS

3.42’

@ 20-FT OFFSET

PROPOSED SUBGRADE

3.42’T/R TO TOP OF 

CL MAIN TRACK 1 (EXIST) CL PROP MAIN TRACK 2

L PROP MAIN TRACK 2

PROP SUBGRADE

(TYP) (TYP)

17’

5.75’

9’

20’

10’ ACCESS ROAD

3:1

SEE END SECTIONS

(TYP)

27’

(TYP)

14’

(TYP)

(TYP)

(TYP)

END STA *

EXIST GROUND

1:10

3:1

L EXISTING MAIN TRACK

9’

TRACK TO BE REMOVED/SHIFTED

3:1

SEE END SECTIONS

2%

1:10

(TYP)

27’

3:1

SEE END SECTIONS

2%

1:10

(TYP)

27’

NOTES:

1.

2.

SEE PLANS AND CROSS SECTIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

SHOULDER & DITCH WIDTHS, AND DITCH DEPTHS ARE VARIABLE.

TYPICAL SECTIONS SHOW TYPICAL DIMENSIONS. TRACK CENTERS, 

EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY DIMENSIONS.

SEE PLANS AND CROSS SECTIONS FOR

3.

ROADWAYS.

SEE ROADWAY END SECTIONS FOR AREAS ADJACENT TO 

TYPICAL TRACK SECTION - A

START STA * END STA *

4.

AND TURNOUT PADS.

TYPICAL WIDTHS VARY AT SIGNAL MOUNDS 

T001 T005 TRACK TYPICAL SECTIONS

DRAWN BY: 

GI_T001.dgn

4/9/2012

of

Engineering Design

Office of Assistant Vice President

CHECKED BY: 

DATE:

SHEET NUMBER

LOCATION & DESCRIPTION:

SHEET TITLE:

UPRR.tblPLOTTING.TBLGI_T001.dgnDefault

OMAHA, NE 68114 

8404 INDIAN HILLS DRIVE

HDR ENGINERING INC.

OMAHA, NE 68102 

222 SOUTH 15th ST, SUITE 247-N

CENTRAL PARK PLAZA NORTH

HNTB CORPORATION

NR -HDR

MPH-HDR

MP 203 TO MP 215

SPRINGFIELD SUBDIVISION

HIGH-SPEED RAIL GIRARD SIDING 

APRIL 09,2012

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

PRELIMINARY

DATE: 04/09/2012
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
  (1)  The undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 10, 2016 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2016-A Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and
 (2)  To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
  rd
 /s/ Mark KaczynskiMark KaczynskiPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 22
# C_2006294EN.01002001.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/20

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 June 2006 — Creative Technology Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) José Vila Ortiz

(Case C-314/05 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Likelihood of confusion - Application for Community word mark ‘PC WORKS’ - Opposition by the proprietor of the national figurative mark ‘W WORK PRO’ - Appeal in part clearly inadmissible and in part clearly unfounded)

(2006/C 294/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Creative Technology Ltd (represented by: S. Jones and P. Rawlinson, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: S. Laitinen, Agent) José Vila Ortiz

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 25 May 2005 in Case T-352/02 Creative Technology Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) dismissing as unfounded an action brought by the applicant for the Community trade mark PC WORKS for products in Class 9 for the annulment of decision R 265/2001-4 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 4 September 2002 dismissing the appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division refusing to register that trade mark in opposition proceedings brought by the holder of the national figurative mark W WORK PRO for products in Class 9

Creative Technology Ltd

Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Creative Technology Ltd is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Creative Technology Ltd is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 26.11.2005.

1

---
### 1

Kaufman Engineering, Inc.

1444 E Lackawanna Ave
Olyphant PA, 18447
cdrzewiecki@kaufmaneng.net
April 4
, 2016

FAA
Docket Management Facility
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12

- 140
Washington, DC 20590

Dear Sir or Madam
,

The purpose of this document is to supplement the petition for exemption of S ection 333 by Kaufman Engineering Inc. (FAA Docket Number

– FAA

- 2015

- 6740) in res ponse to the FAA ’s request for further information (dated March 24. 2016) to meet the requirments of § 11.81

.

Reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest ( § 11.81 (d))
By granting Kaufman Enginee ring, Inc

. ’s current request for exemption from Section 333 ( FAA

- 2015

- 6740)
, the public as a whole would benefit . Granting the petition would further public interest by allowing Kaufman Engineering, Inc. to safely , efficiently, and economically perform commercial aerial data acquisition within the National Airspace System in support of government agencies and private industry alike. Kaufman Engineering, Inc. has long standing relationships with multiple private companies and governmental agencies in the state of Pennsylvania , New York, Maryland, West Virginia and several ot her states whose opera tions could greatly benefit from the services Kaufman Engineering, Inc. proposes to provide (aerial topographic surveys, aerial photography, aerial videography
, etc. ) . The employment of these services would be a great ass et to the local economies surrounding these operations due to increased productivity provided by the proposed work products of Kaufman Engineering, Inc

. Kaufman Engineering , Inc. ‘ s use of UAS would directly benefit the National Airspace System by reducing pollution

### 2

and congestion. Kaufman Engineering, Inc

. ’ s proposed UAS operations would provide an efficient way to gather large amounts of data in an economical fashion, as compared to traditional manned aerial data collectio n techniques and systems. It is noteworthy that Kaufman Engineering, Inc. ’s proposed UAS operations would be realized without implicating any privacy or safety issues.

Additional information, views, or arguments to support Kaufman Engineering, Inc

. ’s request ( § 11.81 (g ))

This petition (FAA

- 2015

- 6740) is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to determine if certain UAS may operate safely in the National Airspace System. As such, Kaufman Engineering, Inc. ’s request for exemption may be granted pursuant to the authority of FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, as set forth in the orig inal petition (FAA

2015

- 6740) written on behalf of Kaufman Engineering, Inc.
Kaufman Engineering, Inc. feels that, as discussed above and in it s original document, it will operate its UAS safely in the National Airspace System in such a way as to not create a haz ard to the National Airspace Syste m, the pu blic, or otherwise pose a threat to national security.
Exhibit 31.1


RULE 13a-14(d) Certification





I, In-Young Chase, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10–K of SATURNS Trust No. 2010-03 (Alcoa) (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.           Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer, The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee of SATURNS Trust No. 2010-03 (Alcoa), has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement, which is the Trust Agreement relating to SATURNS Trust No. 2010-03 (Alcoa); and





5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon and its officers and agents.


By: /s/In-Young ChaseName:        In-Young ChaseTitle:          Vice PresidentDate:          March 29, 2012
Before the Second Division,

April 19, 1944

No. 49351.

#### Protests 618511-G, etc., of Rossett Maufacturing Co. (New York).

*295Opinion by

Tilson, J.

At the trial it was shown that the merchandise in question consists of hats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664), which record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith certain of the merchandise (manufacturer’s No. 505) was held to be properly dutiable at only 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) as claimed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

LEONARD ROMAN 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 Civil Action 2:12-cv-00747 

 v. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers 

 

JOHN BARLOW, et al., 

 

 Defendants. 

ORDER 

 Pursuant to the parties’ consent, on February 27, 2013 this case was referred to United 

States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers to conduct all further proceedings. (ECF 

No. 21.) This matter is before the Court for consideration of the December 18, 2012 Report and 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 11.) No party has objected to the Report 

and Recommendation and the time period for objections has expired. Accordingly, the Report 

and Recommendation hereby constitutes the final Order of this Court. Defendant Anthem Blue 

Cross and Blue Shield is REALIGED as Plaintiff in this case. The Clerk is DIRECTED to 

place Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield on the Court’s docket as a Plaintiff. Plaintiff’s 

Motion for Remand is DENIED. (ECF No. 7.) 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: February 28, 2013 /s/ Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers 

 Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

 

Case: 2:12-cv-00747-EPD Doc #: 22 Filed: 02/28/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
---

Exhibit 99.19

CONSENT OF EXPERT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year
ended December 31, 2014 (the Form 40-F) of Timmins Gold Corp., I, Taj Singh,
M. Eng, P. Eng., CPA, hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with
the references to the mineral reserve and resource estimates for the San
Francisco Project (the Estimates) and to the incorporation by reference of
references to, and summaries of, the Estimates in the Form 40-F.

/s/ Taj SinghName: Taj Singh, M. Eng, P. Eng., CPA

March 25, 2015

---
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

▲ ★

▲

▲ ▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/29

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL

■ ★

■

■

■

★

■

■ ■ ■

● ★

●

● ●

★

●

●

●

●