alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TSR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John G. Sharkey, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.


The forgoing certification is incorporated solely for the purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended
to be used for any other purpose.


/s/ John G. Sharkey
---------------------------
Vice President-Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
October 1, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
EARNINGS AND RETAINED EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    Oct-02-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<CASH>                               61,002
<SECURITIES>                         48,625
<RECEIVABLES>                        75,669
<ALLOWANCES>                          3,230
<INVENTORY>                          37,697
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    227,651
<PP&E>                              178,868
<DEPRECIATION>                       86,806
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      537,853
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                75,179
<BONDS>                               7,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             33,843
<OTHER-SE>                          389,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        537,853
<SALES>                             315,132
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    315,132
<CGS>                               152,764
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        78,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      4,922
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        368
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       88
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      88,343
<INCOME-TAX>                         31,984
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  56,359
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         56,359
<EPS-BASIC>                          1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0


</TABLE>
No. 55434.

#### H. R. Benedict & Sons, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 147919-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
.*AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Compass Construction et al JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

vs. Case No. 2:12-cv- 186

 

 

 Magistrate Judge King

Indiana Kentucky Ohio Regional 

Council of Carpenters of the 

United Brotherhood of Carpenters 

and Joiners of America, et al 

 

[] Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been

tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

[] Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been

tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

[X] Decision by Court. This action was decided by the Court without a trial or hearing.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Opinion and 

Order filed on August 20, 2012 this action is dismissed. 

Date: August 20, 2012. James Bonini, Clerk

 By: s/Rashan Spraggins

 Rashan Spraggins , Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-00186-NMK Doc #: 32 Filed: 08/20/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
**Q500	Owner	Maintenance	Procedures**

All	maintenance	will	be	performed	in	accordance	with	the	manufacturers requirements, safe - operating practices	and	per	the	operator’s	maintenance procedures	as	described	herein. The	Aircraft	log	sheet	will	be	closed	and	a	new	log sheet	created	after	7	days	ending	at	2400	hours	on	Sunday	on	a	weekly	basis. Pre - flight	inspection	per	the	operator’s	checklist	required before	each	flight. The operator	requires	an	inspection	signoff ;	once	daily	on	the	day	that	the	aircraft	is intended	to	be	flown prior	to	flight . Discrepancies	and	deficiencies	will	be	noted	in	the	aircraft	logbook	to	include	an Item	number,	Date	and	time,	Discrepancy,	Persons	name	and	Certificate	number. The	aircra ft	will	not	be	flown	until	the	Discrepancy	is corrected	and signed	off	by the	operator	or	authorized	repair	person,	listing	the	Item	number,	Date	and	Time, the	corrective	action	taken	and	the person’s signature	performing	the	corrective action. All	airfra me,	ground	station	and	component	items	are per	the	manufacturer, on condition	and	time	limits	will	be	set	as	the	needed . As	preventative	maintenance	the	operator	elects	to	time	limit	propeller	O - rings	to	a maximum	of	4	calendar	weeks	of	installation. O - rings	will	be	removed	and	replaced at	that	time	interval	or	upon	condition with	an	equivalent	or	higher	quality	O - ring than that supplied	by	the	manufacturer .		All	four	O - rings	will	be	replaced	anytime	a replacement	is	performed.		An	appropriate	entry	wi ll	be	made	noting	the flight time since	last	change and	the	installation	date	and	time . Weekly,	beginning	at	the	start	of	a	new	week	the	propeller	shaft	threads	will	have	a small	amount	of	anti - seize	applied	to	the	propeller	hub	threads	to	prevent	galling and	propeller	seizure. Propellers	will	be	installed	by	turning	the	propeller	in	the	proper	direction	until contact	is	made	with	the	O - ring,	then one	full	and	a	half	turn	will	be	made	to properly	seat	the	propellers	on	the	shaft.		This	is	per	the	manufacturers recommendation. This	maintenance	procedure	list	will	be	updated	and	amended	as	necessary.
BATHYMETRIC MAP

LISBURNE PENINSULA
DE LONG MOUNTAINS

syo000me,

Cape Sabine

7640000m..y

LISBURNE
PENINSULA

7650000m.NN,

7550000m.N,

+

5]0000m.g.

Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service (NOS) from Bathy-
metric Data other than NOS hydrographic surveys. This is a facsimile
reproduction of the bathymetric manuscript and does not necessarily
represent the final publication. This information is not intended for navi-
gational purposes.

Bathymetric Contour Intervals: 10 meters to maximum depth, supplemented
by 2 meter intervals.

Datum: Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW).

Universal Transverse Mercator Grid. Zone 3; 10,000 meter ticks (---) are
shown inside the neatline.

Protraction Diagram data shown in a subdued (screened) black was com-
piled by the Minerals Management Service (MMS].

THIS MAP IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal leasing purposes;
for such purposes use the MMS Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction
Diagrams.

Heavy line(s} indicate limits of these protraction diagrams.

EVALUATION OF BATHYMETRIC DATA

Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service from
Random Tracklines and Bathymetric Surveys dated 1944 to 1974.
‘The Bathymetric Data ranges in scale from 1:500:000 to
1:1,000,000 with a minimum line spacing of 3.0 and 2 maximum
line spacing of 15.0 nautical miles.

Data corrected for sound velocity according to Echo-Sounding
Correction Tables, 1980

755 0000m.N

68°

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MAP

NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE

1986

Produced at Washington, D.C.
for

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE

TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION
Scale 1:250,000
10

20 Statute Miles
=I

5 0
— 15
5 ° 5 10 15 20 25
i = 1 20 Kilometers
5 —° 5 10 15 Nautical Miles

165°

6p

68°

BATHYMETRIC DATA INDEX

T e000. “162°

15, DE LONG MTS.

Bathymetric data from sources other than
NOS hydrographic surveys.

NOS NR 3-8 (OCS)

INDEX TO
169"__ ADJOINING SHEETS __ 159°.

8
—

POINT LAY
West.

NR 35

Foy DE Long
Hope Mts,

165°

TS,
68° NR 3-7 we 3's
762°

care NOATAK
SEPPINGS
NO 31 Nase

67°
168°

{
{

|
|
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00392-CR

KOURTNEY JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (1555545D)

May 6, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the trial court’s judgment 

is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Elizabeth Kerr__________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
# C_2008108EN.01000701.xml

| 29.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 April 2008

(2008/C 108/07)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5628 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 163,55 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4623 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78470 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3514 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6181 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 114,52 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9655 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,161 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,28 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6980 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,4330 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6228 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 32,252 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9995 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6666 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5853 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,1745 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9906 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1293 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 556,94 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,7966 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,9418 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2631 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 401,20 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9377 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,036 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,9110 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,533 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6008 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3227 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5628

JPY

Japanese yen

163,55

DKK

Danish krone

7,4623

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78470

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3514

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6181

ISK

Iceland króna

114,52

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9655

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,161

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,28

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6980

PLN

Polish zloty

3,4330

RON

Romanian leu

3,6228

SKK

Slovak koruna

32,252

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9995

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6666

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5853

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,1745

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9906

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1293

KRW

South Korean won

1 556,94

ZAR

South African rand

11,7966

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,9418

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2631

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 401,20

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9377

PHP

Philippine peso

66,036

RUB

Russian rouble

36,9110

THB

Thai baht

49,533

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6008

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3227

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
LOWELL JONES, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CASE NO. 2:12-CV-125 

JUDGE WATSON 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE ABEL 

BRIAN COOK, WARDEN, 

Respondent. 

OPINION AND ORDER 

On November 9, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation 

recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254 be dismissed. Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the 

Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the consequences of failing to do 

so, no objections have been filed. 

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is 

hereby DISMISSED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

United 

JtJJi/#~ States District Judge 

Case: 2:12-cv-00125-MHW-MRA Doc #: 11 Filed: 12/13/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SEAN JENKINS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1596

[ October 19, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Martin County ; Lawrence M. Mirman , Judge; L.T. Case No.

431997CF001223A

.

Sean Jenkins, Century, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R.

Napodano, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, C ONNER and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>
                                                             EXHIBIT 11


            STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                       TRANSAMERICA CORPORATION


                                        Nine months ended September 30,
                                              1996         1995
                                         (Dollar amounts in millions,
                                            except for share data)
Primary

Average shares outstanding                     66.8         68.9
Net effect of dilutive stock options--
  based on the treasury stock method
  using average market price                    1.6*         1.6*
                                               ____         ____
                                  TOTAL        68.4         70.5
                                               ====         ====

Net income                                   $335.1       $361.1
Preferred dividends                           (12.8)       (13.6)
                                             ______       ______
Net income to common                         $322.3       $347.5
                                             ======       ======

Per share amount                              $4.82        $5.04
                                              =====        =====

Fully Diluted

Average shares outstanding                     66.8         68.9
Net effect of dilutive stock options--
  based on the treasury stock method
  using the market price at quarter end
  if higher than the average market
  price for three months                        1.7*         1.9*
                                               ____         ____
                                  TOTAL        68.5         70.8
                                               ====         ====

Net income                                   $335.1       $361.1
Preferred dividends                           (12.8)       (13.6)
                                             ______       ______
Net income to common                         $322.3       $347.5
                                             ======       ======

Per share amount                              $4.82        $5.04
                                              =====        =====

*Not included in per share calculation because effect is less
 than 3%.
**Exhibit
      10 (d)**





**FIRST
      AMENDMENT TO**


**INDUSTRIAL
      LEASE AGREEMENT**








**THIS
      FIRST AMENDMENT TO INDUSTRIAL LEASE AGREEMENT(The First Amendment)** is
      made this _____ day of June, 2007, by and between **LIBERTY
      PROPERTY/SYNTERRA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP**, a Pennsylvania limited
      partnership (**“Landlord”**) and **TASTY BAKING
      COMPANY**, a Pennsylvania corporation
      (**“Tenant”**).




W
      I T N E
      S S E T H:





WHEREAS,
      Landlord and Tenant entered into an Industrial Lease Agreement dated May 8,
      2007
      (the “**Lease**”) for an approximately 25 acre lot located within
      the Navy Yard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania as more particularly described in
      the
      Lease (the “**Premises**”);





WHEREAS,
      under the terms of Paragraph 30(d) (Lease Contingencies), Landlord may terminate
      the Lease if, on or before the date that is thirty (30) days after May 8, 2007
      (i.e. June 7, 2007), Landlord (or Landlord’s Affiliate) and Tenant have not
      entered into a lease (the “**Office Lease”)**for approximately
      35,000 square feet of office space in an office building to be constructed
      by an
      Affiliate of Landlord in the Navy Yard and commonly known as Three Crescent
      Drive (the “**Office Lease Contingency**”);





WHEREAS,
      Landlord and Tenant wish to extend the Office Lease Contingency for the Office
      Lease until June 15, 2007.





NOW,
      THEREFORE, intending to be legally
      bound, Landlord and Tenant hereby agree the Office Lease Contingency has been
      extended to June 15, 2007.  All other terms of the Lease are in full
      force and effect.





This
      First Amendment may be executed by
      the parties hereto and any number of separate counterparts, all of which, when
      delivered, shall together constitute one and the same agreement.





This
      First Amendment may be executed by
      facsimile signature which shall, for all purposes, serve as an original executed
      counterpart of the First Amendment upon delivery of an executed copy here by
      facsimile.









IN
      WITNESS
      WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have executed this First Amendment as of the day
      and year first above written.




**Landlord:**
 
 **LIBERTY
        PROPERTY/SYNTERRA**
 LIMITED
        PARTNERSHIP
 
 By:  Liberty
        Property Philadelphia Navy Yard
 Limited
        Partnership, its General Partner
 
 By:  Liberty
        Property Philadelphia Navy
 Yard
        Corporation, its General Partner
  By:John
                  S. GattusoSenior
                  Vice President
  **Tenant:****TASTY
                  BAKING COMPANY**By:Name:
                  Larry WeilheimerTitle:








2
#### Gedeon Heller *v.*United States

No. 7406.

Invoice dated London, England, September 1943.

Certified September 1943.

Entered at New York, N. Y., October 23, 1943.

Entry No. 712262.

(Decided October 14, 1947)

*Strauss & Hedges (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
APPENDIX S-A-4

WIGWAM AVENUE MSF MODIFICATION

S-A-4-1
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 6963

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JOHN SAMUEL LEIGH, a/k/a J.D., a/k/a J.R. , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. Gina M. Groh , District Judge. ( 3:00

- cr - 00057

- GMG

- RWT

- 25 )

Submitted : April 18, 2024 Decided: April 19, 2024

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. John Samuel Leigh , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6963 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/19/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: John Samuel Leigh appeals the district court’s paperless order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order. United States v. Leigh , No. 3:00

- cr - 00057

- GMG

- RWT

- 25 (N.D.W. Va. June 24, 2022)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6963 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/19/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
# C_2008164EN.01000202.xml

| 27.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5177 — Goldman Sachs/Candover/Expro)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 164/04)

On 17 June 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5177. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5177. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
(Reap. Dec. 9776)

#### Clear View Plastics *v.*United States

Entry No. M-1346; M-1533; M-3561.

(Decided August 31, 1960)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Ooehrcm Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeals for a re-appraisement were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official records discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

*469I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.