### 6784 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2010 / Notices

10 The text of the proposed rule change is

available on ISE’s Web site at http://www.ise.com,

on the Commission’s Web site at http://

www.sec.gov, at ISE, and at the Commission’s

Public Reference Room.

11 In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered its impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C 78c(f).

12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). 13 Id.

14 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

15 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site ( http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, 10 all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
ISE. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2010–11 and should be submitted on or before March 3, 2010.

IV. Commission’s Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change

The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange. 11 Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) 12 of the Act, which requires that
the rules of a national securities exchange provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among members and issuers and other persons using its
facilities.

As described more fully above, ISE recently amended DECN’s fee schedule for ISE Members pursuant to SR–ISE– 2010–10 (the ‘‘ Member Fee Filing ’’ ). The fee changes made pursuant to the Member Fee Filing became operative on February 1, 2010. DECN receives rebates and is charged fees for transactions it

executes on EGDX or EDGA in its capacity as an introducing broker for its non-ISE member subscribers. The current proposal, which will apply retroactively to February 1, 2010, will allow DECN to pass through the revised
rebates and fees to the non-ISE member
subscribers for which it acts an introducing broker. The Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with the Act because it will provide rebates and charge fees to non-ISE member subscribers that are equivalent
to those established for ISE member subscribers in the Member Fee Filing. 13

ISE has requested that the Commission find good cause for approving the proposed rule change prior to the thirtieth day after publication of notice of filing thereof in
the Federal Register. As discussed above, the proposal will allow DECN to pass through to non-ISE member
subscribers the revised rebate and fees
established for ISE member subscribers in the Member Fee Filing, resulting in equivalent rebates and fees for ISE
member and non-member subscribers. In addition, because the proposal will apply the revised rebates and fees retroactively to February 1, 2010, the
revised rebates and fees will have the same effective date, thereby promoting consistency in the DECN’s fee schedule. Accordingly, the Commission finds good cause, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, for approving the proposed rule change prior to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of notice of filing thereof in the Federal Register.

V. Conclusion

It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 14 that the proposed rule change (SR–ISE–2010–11) be, and hereby is, approved on an
accelerated basis.

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. 15

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010–2957 Filed 2–9–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 8011–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF STATE**

**[Public Notice: 6896]**

**Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant**  **Proposals: The Youth Exchange and Study (YES) Summer Academy** 

Announcement Type: New Grant. Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C/PY–10–27. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 19.415.

Application Deadline: March 19,

2010.

Executive Summary: The Office of Citizen Exchanges, Youth Programs Division, of the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) announces an open competition for a grant for a summer academy for youth. Public and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.501(c)(3), including accredited, postsecondary U.S. educational institutions,may submit proposals to provide a fourweek U.S.-based Academy in July 2010 for up to 27 teenagers. Seventeen of the participants will be foreign students from multiple countries who have already been screened and selected for an exchange program in the United States. They will be joined at the Academy by 10 American teenagers selected by the U.S. grant recipient. The Academy’s activities will focus on leadership development, critical thinking, communication skills, and community activism, in addition to exposure to U.S. culture and society through site visits and homestays with
American families.

I. Funding Opportunity Description

Authority: Overall grant making authority for this program is contained
in the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87– 256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the

Act is ‘‘to enable the Government of the
United States to increase mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the
ties which unite us with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the
United States and other
nations* * *and thus to assist in the development of friendly, sympathetic and peaceful relations between the
United States and the other countries of
the world. ’’ The funding authority for the program above is provided through legislation.

Purpose: This Academy aims to foster relationships between American teenagers and teenagers from countries with significant Muslim populations to build strong linkages and an awareness of shared values, and to enable youth to face together the global challenges of the 21st Century. Through this Academy, diverse but intellectually curious students will participate in an intensive, four-week program in the United States in the summer of 2010. Participants will


### 6785 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2010 / Notices

be engaged in a variety of activities such as training sessions, workshops, community and/or school-based programs, and cultural events. Participants will work on projects that promote community engagement to be implemented in their home

communities.

Goals: The goals of the Academy are (1) to develop a sense of civic responsibility and a commitment to cooperation among youth; (2) to foster relationships among youth from different ethnic, religious, and national groups; (3) to promote mutual understanding between the people of the United States and other countries; and (4) to stimulate the development of a cadre of young leaders who will share the knowledge and skills gained through participation in the Academy with their peers through positive action after they
return to their home communities.

With the specific focus of these institutes, the following outcomes will indicate a successful project:

• Participants from abroad will demonstrate an improved understanding of the United States and its people, and the American students
will better understand the interests of the people of the participating

countries.

• Participants will work together to identify and overcome misunderstanding or lack of understanding among nations both during the institute and after they return
home.

• Participants will develop critical thinking skills that will enable them to assess the reliability of media sources, and to analyze possible bias in journalism.

• Participants will demonstrate a better understanding of community service and leadership skills to carry out a successful project that addresses a
need in their home communities.

Participants: The 17 participants from abroad were competitively selected through a rigorous screening process for an academic-year exchange program. These participants were unable to take part in that program as planned, and will be attending this Academy instead. The grant recipient will be required to work with the two organizations thatselected them in order to provide predeparture orientation materials, to arrange international travel, and to facilitate community service project implementation after participants return
home. The international travel costs will be borne by these other two organizations through a separate funding arrangement.

The Academy: The U.S. program will begin and end in Washington, DC. At the outset, all participants will be engaged in a three- to four-day orientation and study tour of Washington. The closing session will include a meeting with State Department officials plus concluding workshops to prepare the participants
for their return home and finalization of their action plans for service projects at
home.

The intervening weeks of the Academy may take place in one or two
communities and should offer the participants exposure to the variety of
American life.

The Academy will take place on a U.S. university or college campus or at a similar group-oriented venue. For a portion of the academy, the participants will be housed together since living together will facilitate greater cooperation. For at least two weeks of the Academy, all participants will have homestays with local families.

During the course of the Academy, the grant recipient will arrange for mentors for the participants; the mentors may also serve as trainers or instructors, as appropriate. Adult staff should be available to support and supervise the participants during the course of the

Institute.

Program content: Through an approach of ‘‘ Think Globally, Act Locally, ’’ the Academy themes will
cover issues of common concern to young adults worldwide. Applicants are encouraged to be creative in identifying specific issues that are of broad interest to this age group. To explore these topics, the participants will also look at volunteer community service, respect for diversity, and youth leadership through interactive activities, practical experiences, and other hands-on opportunities. Leadership training will cover communication skills, critical thinking, problem solving, and team building. The program should offer exposure to U.S. culture and society through site visits and homestays with
American families. In addition to the selected American participants, program activities should engage American teenagers wherever possible. Social, cultural, and recreational activities will
balance the schedule.

Guidelines: Pending the availability of funds, the grant will begin on or about May 28, 2010. Applicants should propose a U.S. academy that will take place for four weeks between July 1, 2010, and August 6, 2010. The grant period will be approximately eight months in duration, as appropriate to the program design.

The grant recipient will be responsible for the following: • Recruitment, screening, and selection of ten American participants, ages 16–18, representing the diversity of
the United States.

• The designing and planning of a substantive program in the United States that promotes international dialogue on key global issues, critical thinking, respect for diversity, leadership development, civic education, and community service.
Some activities should be school and/or community-based, as feasible, and the projects will involve as much interaction with American peers, even beyond those directly participating in the Academy, as possible.

• Logistical arrangements, properly screened host family arrangements, other accommodations, disbursement of stipends, local travel, and travel
between sites.

• Monitoring of the participants’ safety and well-being while participating in the Academy, including during the homestays.

• Support in the planning and implementation of community service projects that the participants will implement upon their return home.

Applicant organizations must demonstrate their capacity for doing projects of this nature, focusing on three areas of competency: (1) Provision of programs that address the goals and themes outlined in this document; (2) age-appropriate programming for youth; and (3) previous experience in working with diverse international groups. The grant recipient must be able to assist the in-country organizations and the U.S. embassies in supporting follow-on activities for the foreign alumni of the Academy. The grant recipient will assume sole responsibility for supporting the follow-on activities of
the American alumni.

Proposals must demonstrate how the stated objectives will be met. The proposal narrative should provide detailed information on how the major program activities will be implemented, and applicants should explain and justify their programmatic choices. Programs must comply with J–1 visa regulations for the International Visitor category. Please be sure to refer to the complete Solicitation Package—this RFGP, the Project Objectives, Goals, and Implementation (POGI), and the Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)—for further information.

II. Award Information

Type of Award: Grant Agreement. Fiscal Year Funds: FY–2010. Approximate Total Funding: $140,000.

Number of Awards: One.


### 6786 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2010 / Notices

Approximate Average Award: $140,000.

Anticipated Award Date: Pending availability of funds, May 28, 2010.

Anticipated Project Completion Date: December 31, 2010.

III. Eligibility Information

III.1. Eligible Applicants

Applications may be submitted by public and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).

III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds

There is no minimum or maximum percentage required for this competition. However, the Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.

When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal and later included in an approved agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in accordance with OMB Circular A–110, (Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA’s contribution will be reduced in like proportion.

III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements

(a.) Bureau grant guidelines require that organizations with less than four years’ experience in conducting international exchanges be limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA anticipates making two awards in amounts exceeding $60,000 to support program and administrative costs required to implement this exchange program. Therefore, organizations with less than four years’ experience in conducting international exchanges are ineligible to apply under this competition. The Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.

IV. Application and Submission
Information

Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.

IV.1. Contact Information To Request an Application Package

Please contact the Youth Programs Division (ECA/PE/C/PY), U.S. Department of State, SA–5, 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20522–0503, Telephone (202) 632–6065, Fax (202) 632–9355, E-mail: ORourkeMM@state.gov to request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to the Funding Opportunity Number (ECA/PE/ C/PY–10–27) when making your request. Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f
for further information.

The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI) document which consists of required application forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation. It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) document, which provides specific information, award criteria and budget instructions tailored to this competition.

Please specify Program Officer Carolyn Lantz and refer to the Funding Opportunity Name and Number located at the top of this announcement on all other inquiries and correspondence.

IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet

The entire Solicitation Package may
be downloaded from the Bureau’s Web

site at http://exchanges.state.gov/grants/ open2.html, or from the Grants.gov Web

site at http://www.grants.gov.

Please read all information before downloading.

IV.3. Content and Form of Submission

Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation Package. The application should be submitted per the instructions under IV.3f.

‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission ’’ section below.

IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities. Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a DUNS number,

access http://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1– 866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the appropriate box of the SF–424 which is part of the formal application package.

IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal narrative and budget.

Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) document and the mandatory Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document for additional formatting and technical requirements.

IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of application.
Please note: Effective January 7, 2009, all applicants for ECA federal assistance
awards must include in their application the names of directors and/ or senior executives (current officers, trustees, and key employees, regardless of amount of compensation). In fulfilling this requirement, applicants
must submit information in one of the following ways:

(1) Those who file Internal Revenue Service Form 990, ‘‘Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax, ’’ must include a copy of relevant portions of this form.

(2) Those who do not file IRS Form
990 must submit information above in
the format of their choice.

In addition to final program reporting requirements, award recipients will also be required to submit a one-page document, derived from their program reports, listing and describing their grant activities. For award recipients,
the names of directors and/or senior executives (current officers, trustees,and key employees), as well as the onepage description of grant activities, will be transmitted by the State Department to OMB, along with other information required by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), and will be made available to the public by the Office of Management and Budget on its USASpending.gov Web site as part of ECA’s FFATA reporting requirements.

If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not received a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three years, or if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS within the past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure to do so will cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.

IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information when preparing your proposal narrative:

IV.3d.1 Adherence To All Regulations Governing The J Visa.


### 6787 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2010 / Notices

The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs is the official program sponsor of the exchange program covered by this RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau
will be the ‘‘ Responsible Officer’’ for the program under the terms of 22 CFR part 62, which covers the administration of the Exchange Visitor Program (J visa program). Under the terms of 22 CFR part 62, organizations receiving awards (either a grant or cooperative agreement) under this RFGP will be third parties

‘‘ cooperating with or assisting the sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor’s

program. ’’ The actions of recipient organizations shall be ‘‘ imputed to the sponsor in evaluating the sponsor’s compliance with ’’ 22 CFR part 62. Therefore, the Bureau expects that any organization receiving an award under this competition will render all assistance necessary to enable the Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR part 62 et seq.

The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places critically important emphases on the secure and proper administration of Exchange Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence by recipient organizations and program participants to all regulations governing the J visa program status. Therefore, proposals should explicitly state in writing that the applicant is prepared to assist the Bureau in meeting all requirements governing the administration of Exchange Visitor Programs as set forth in 22 CFR part 62. If your organization has experience as a designated Exchange Visitor Program Sponsor, the applicant should discuss their record of compliance with 22 CFR part 62 et seq., including the oversight of their Responsible Officers and Alternate Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program participants, provision of pre-arrival
information and orientation to participants, monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and security of forms, record-keeping, reporting and other requirements.

The Office of Citizen Exchanges of ECA will be responsible for issuing DS– 2019 forms to participants in this

program.

A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at http://exchanges.state.gov/ jexchanges/index.html or from: Office of Designation, ECA/EC/D, SA–5, Floor C2, Department of State, Washington, DC

20522–0582.

IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines.

Pursuant to the Bureau’s authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-political character and should be balanced and representative of the diversity of American political, social,
and cultural life. ‘‘Diversity ’’ should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,religion, geographic location, socioeconomic status, and disabilities. Applicants are strongly encouraged to
adhere to the advancement of this principle both in program administration and in program content.
Please refer to the review criteria under the ‘Support for Diversity’ section for specific suggestions on incorporating diversity into your proposal. Public Law 104–319 provides that ‘‘ in carrying out programs of educational and cultural exchange in countries whose people do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy, ’’ the Bureau ‘‘ shall take appropriate steps to provide opportunities for participation in such programs to human rights and democracy leaders of such countries. ’’ Public Law 106–113 requires that the governments of the countries described above do not have inappropriate influence in the selection process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.

IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation.

Proposals must include a plan to monitor and evaluate the project’s success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other technique plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the recipient organization will track participants or partners and be able to respond to key evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program, learning as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of the program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions in which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure gains in mutual understanding as well as substantive knowledge.

Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation plan should include a description of your project’s objectives, your anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are

‘‘ smart’’ (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.

Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important to show the scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast, represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.

We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes, as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in increasing order of importance):

1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange experience.

2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude, skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.

3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new knowledge gained;
continued contacts between participants, community members, and
others.

4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational improvements.

Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,satisfaction is usually captured as a shortterm outcome, whereas behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-term outcomes.

Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be judged on how well it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will


### 6788 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2010 / Notices

be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)

Recipient organizations will be required to provide reports analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. All data collected, including survey responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the Bureau upon request.

IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when preparing your budget:

IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF–

424A—‘‘ Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs ’’ along with a comprehensive budget for the entire program. Grant requests may not exceed $140,000. This amount will not include
the international travel costs for the foreign exchange participants. There must be a summary budget as well as breakdowns reflecting both administrative and program budgets.Applicants may provide separate subbudgets for each program component, phase, location, or activity to provide
clarification.

The Bureau reserves the right to reduce, revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of the program and the availability of
funds.

Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget guidelines and formatting instructions.

IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission:

Application Deadline Date: Friday, March 19, 2010

Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/PY–

10–27

Methods of Submission

Applications may be submitted in one of two ways:

(1.) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery service (i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or (2.) electronically through http:// www.grants.gov.

Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF– 424 contained in the mandatory Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.

IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed Applications.

Applications must be shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on
or before the above deadline but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be ineligible for
further consideration under this competition. Proposals shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for consideration under this competition. ECA will not notify you upon receipt of application. It is each applicant’s responsibility to ensure that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in person for this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.

Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure to include one extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM ’’

.

The original and six copies of the application should be sent to: Program Management Division, ECA–IIP/EX/PM, Ref.: ECA/PE/C/PY–10–27, SA–5, Floor 4, Department of State, Washington, DC

20522–0504.

With the submission of the proposal package, please also e-mail the Executive Summary, Proposal Narrative, and Budget sections of the proposal, as well as any attachments essential to understanding the program, in Microsoft Word and/or Excel to the program
officer at LantzCS@state.gov.

IV.3f.2—Submitting Electronic Applications.

Applicants have the option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov ( http:// www.grants.gov ). Complete solicitation packages are available at Grants.gov in
the ‘‘ Find ’’ portion of the system.

Please follow the instructions available in the ‘Get Started’ portion of the site ( http://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).

Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov.

Once registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an application will vary depending on a variety of factors including the size of the application and the speed of your internet connection. In addition, validation of an electronic submission via Grants.gov can take up to two business days. Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to begin the submission process through Grants.gov.

The Grants.gov website includes extensive information on all phases/ aspects of the Grants.gov process, including an extensive section on frequently asked questions, located
under the ‘‘ For Applicants ’’ section of the website. ECA strongly recommends that all potential applicants review thoroughly the Grants.gov website, well in advance of submitting a proposal through the Grants.gov system. ECA bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.

Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support; Contact Center Phone: 800–518–4726; Business Hours: Monday–Friday, 7 a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time; Email: support@grants.gov.

Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.

Please refer to the Grants.gov website,
for definitions of various ‘‘ application

statuses ’’ and the difference between a submission receipt and a submission validation. Applicants will receive a validation e-mail from grants.gov upon
the successful submission of an application. Again, validation of an electronic submission via Grants.gov can take up to two business days. Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to begin the submission process through Grants.gov. ECA will not notify you upon receipt of electronic applications.

It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via the Grants.gov web portal to ensure that proposals have been received by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.

IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications.

Executive Order 12372 does not apply to this program.

V. Application Review Information

V.1. Review Process

The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility. Proposals will


### 6789 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2010 / Notices

be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review. Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the discretion of the Department of State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for assistance awards (grants) resides with the
Bureau’s Grants Officer.

Review Criteria

Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below:

1. Quality of the program idea: The proposed program should be well developed, respond to design outlined in the solicitation, and demonstrate originality. It should be clearly and accurately written, substantive, and with sufficient detail. Proposals should exhibit originality, substance, precision,
and relevance to the Bureau’s mission.

2. Program planning and ability to achieve program objectives: A detailed agenda and work plan should clearly demonstrate how project objectives would be achieved. The agenda and plan should adhere to the program overview and guidelines described above. The substance of workshops, seminars, presentations, school-based activities, and/or site visits should be described in detail. Objectives should be reasonable, feasible, and flexible. The proposal should clearly demonstrate how the applicant will meet the program’s objectives and plan.

3. Support of diversity: The proposal should demonstrate the recipient’s commitment to promoting the awareness and understanding of diversity in program content. Applicants should demonstrate readiness to accommodate participants with physical disabilities.

4. Institutional capacity and track
record: Proposed personnel and
institutional resources should be adequate and appropriate to achieve the program goals. The proposal should demonstrate an institutional record, including responsible fiscal management and full compliance with all reporting requirements for past Bureau grants as determined by the
Bureau’s Office of Contracts. The Bureau will consider the past performance.

5. Project evaluation: The proposal should include a plan to evaluate the activity’s success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of the program. The proposal should include a draft survey questionnaire or other technique plus description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original project objectives. The grant recipient will be expected to submit intermediate reports after each project component is
concluded.

6. Cost-effectiveness and cost sharing: The applicant should demonstrate
efficient use of Bureau funds. The
overhead and administrative components of the proposal, including salaries and honoraria, should be kept as low as possible. All other items should be necessary and appropriate.The proposal should maximize costsharing through other private sector support as well as institutional direct funding contributions, which
demonstrates institutional and community commitment.

VI. Award Administration Information

VI.1a. Award Notices

Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures. Successful applicants will receive a Federal Assistance Award (FAA) from
the Bureau’s Grants Office. The FAA and the original proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall be the only binding authorizing document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer, and mailed to the recipient’s responsible officer identified in the application.

Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this competition.

VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements

Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements include the following:

Office of Management and Budget Circular A–122, ‘‘ Cost Principles for Nonprofit Organizations. ’’

Office of Management and Budget Circular A–21, ‘‘ Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions. ’’

OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘ Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian

Governments. ’’

OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.

OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local

Governments.

OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits ofStates, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.

Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information: http:// www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants. http://fa.statebuy.state.gov

. VI.3. Reporting Requirements

You must provide ECA with a hard copy original plus one copy of the following reports:

1. Quarterly reports, as required in the Bureau grant agreement.

2. A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award;

3. A concise, one-page final program report summarizing program outcomes no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award. This one-page report will be transmitted to OMB, and be made available to the public via OMB’s USAspending.gov Web site—as part of ECA’s Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting requirements.

4. An SF–PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress Report’’ Cover Sheet with all program reports.

Award recipients will be required to provide reports analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.

All data collected, including survey responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the Bureau upon request.

All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.

VII. Agency Contacts

For questions about this announcement, contact: Carolyn Lantz, Program Officer, Youth Programs Division (ECA/PE/C/PY), U.S. Department of State, SA–5, 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20522–0503, Telephone (202) 632–6421, Fax (202) 632–9355, E-mail: LantzCS@state.gov.

All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should reference the title, YES Summer Academy, and number, ECA/PE/C/PY–10–27.

Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries


### 6790 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2010 / Notices

or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.

VIII. Other Information

Notice

The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce, revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.

Dated: February 3, 2010. Maura M. Pally, Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of

State.

[FR Doc. 2010–2981 Filed 2–9–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4710–05–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Office of the Secretary**

**Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity**  **and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B (Formerly Subpart Q)**  **During the Week Ending January 30,**

**2010**

The following Applications for:
Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation’s Procedural Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et.

seq. ). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.

Docket Number: DOT–OST–2010–

0023.

Date Filed: January 25, 2010. Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope: February 16, 2010.

Description: Application of Wings Airways, Inc. requesting a certificate of public convenience and necessity to transport passenger, property and mail in interstate air transportation.

Docket Number: DOT–OST–2010–

0028.

Date Filed: January 29, 2010. Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope: February 19, 2010.

Description: Application of Aero Republica S.A. requesting a foreign air carrier permit and corresponding exemption to enable it to engage in daily scheduled nonstop flights between Bogota, Colombia and Miami, Florida.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2010–2903 Filed 2–9–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Surface Transportation Board**

**[STB Finance Docket No. 35346]**

**Nebraska Northwestern Railroad, Inc.—Acquisition and Operation**  **Exemption—Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation** 

Nebraska Northwestern Railroad, Inc. (NNW), a noncarrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire (by purchase and lease) from Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation (DM&E) and to operate approximately 28.1 miles of rail line as follows: (1) By purchase between milepost 404.5 near Chadron, NE., and milepost 411.72 Engineering Station 7492+73 near Dakota Junction, NE.; and (2) by lease between milepost 411.72 Engineering Station 7492+73 near Dakota Junction and milepost 432.6 near Crawford, NE., together with various side tracks, spur tracks, connections and
other facilities located therein.

NNW states that the proposed transaction does not contain any provision or involve any agreement
between it and DM&E that would limit NNW’s future ability to interchange traffic with a third party connecting

carrier.

NNW certifies that its projected
annual revenues as a result of the
transaction will not result in NNW becoming a Class II or Class I rail carrier and further certifies that its projected annual revenues will not exceed $5
million.

NNW states that it expects the
transaction to be consummated as soon as practicable following the effective of this exemption. The earliest this transaction may be consummated is February 24, 2010, the effective date of the exemption (30 days after the exemption was filed).

If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the exemption. Petitions for stay must be filed no later than February 17, 2010 (at least 7 days before the exemption becomes effective).

An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB Finance Docket No. 35346, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423– 0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be served on Michael W. Blaszak, 211 South Leitch Avenue, La Grange, IL 60525.

Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at http:// www.stb.dot.gov

.

Decided: February 4, 2010.
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2010–2875 Filed 2–9–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4915–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY**

**Office of Thrift Supervision**

**Interagency Guidance on Response Programs for Unauthorized Access to** 
**Customer Information and Customer**

**Notice**

**AGENCY :**  Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), Treasury.

**ACTION :**  Notice and request for comment.

**SUMMARY :**  The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed and continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44
U.S.C. 3507. The Office of Thrift Supervision within the Department of the Treasury will submit the proposed information collection requirement
described below to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act. Today, OTS is soliciting public comments on its proposal to
extend this information collection.

**DATES :**  Submit written comments on or before April 12, 2010.