alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Saitta J.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA vert.4; Hardesty j

. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
BARRY CRAIG MALONE, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. No. 68487



# FILED JUN 2 7 2016

This is an appeal from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Carolyn Ellsworth, Judge.

Notice of entry of the challenged order was served on appellant and his counsel by mail on June 12, 2015. Because the notice of appeal was filed in the district court on July 20, 2015, four days beyond the relevant appeal period, see NRS 34.575(1); NRAP 26(c), and appellant has failed to demonstrate that he delivered the notice of appeal to a prison official for mailing on or before the expiration of the appeal period, see NEAP 4(d), we conclude that the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Therefore, we lack jurisdiction, see Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994), and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

• kc) 

# a-cf.P2i (0) 1947Acc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge The Law Office of Dan M. Winder, P.C. Terrence M. Jackson Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk Barry Craig Malone

2 SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 

### e
No. 41952.

#### Petition 5429-R of Jose A. Montemayor e Hijos (Laredo).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that there was no intention to defraud the revenue or to conceal or misrepresent the facts. The petition was therefore granted.
No. 54830.

#### Stephen Rug Mills, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 149340-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
January 27, 2016 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE Washington, DC 20950 Dear Sir/MadamSubject: This isa request for exemption of section 333 ofthe FAA Reform Act and Part 11ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations form 14 C.F.R part 21 subpart H, 45.27(a). 45.29 (3) (eXd)(e)(f)(g) (h), 91.103, 91.119,91.121,91.203,91.151 Pursuant to Section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11.1, I Daniel Smede, a licensed Private Pilot

(crt. no. 71269541 ),is personally applying foran exemption from the following code of Federal Regulations tobe allowed commercial operation ofa lightweight unmanned Aircraft system for the purpose of aerial photography and video of real estate properties and landscapes.My company, Smede Marketing and Distribution, has been operating inthe Boise, Idaho market for over 25 years, and includes Idaho Property Images and Idaho Real Estate Photography. My flight experience covers more than 20 years with more than 5,000 hours logged in single engine land. Ialso have experience flying the DJI Inspire 1 quadcopter and successfully demonstrated an ability to maneuver the craft within FAA published guidelines safely. I would also be the PICofthe UAS. If granted, my request would permit operation ofthe lightweight quadcopter DJIInspire 1in areas away from public gatherings, congestion, airports and vehicular traffic. The exemption would allow
# C_2007297EN.01003302.xml

| 8.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/33

---

Order of the President of the Court of 11 September 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-483/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 297/56)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 20, 27.1.2007.

1

---
# C_2007269EN.01005501.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/55

---

Action brought on 31 August 2007 — Denka International v Commission

(Case T-334/07)

(2007/C 269/98)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Denka International BV (Barneveld, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Mereu and K. Van Maldegem, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Order the annulment of Decision 2007/387/EC of 6 June 2007 concerning the non-inclusion of dichlorvos in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the annulment of Decision 2007/387/EC of 6 June 2007 concerning the non-inclusion of dichlorvos in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance; and

| — | order the defendant to pay all costs and expenses in these proceedings, as well as compensatory and moratory interests of 8 %. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all costs and expenses in these proceedings, as well as compensatory and moratory interests of 8 %.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicant are identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-326/07 Cheminova and Others v Commission.

Cheminova and Others

Commission

---
Case: 2:12-cv-01180-EAS-EPD Doc #: 55 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T16:30:40-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
September 13, 1972

No. 72-33

#### James M. Lewis, Formerly PFC, U. S. Marine Corps v United States.

Petitioner contends, and the Government in its reply admits, that a request for trial by military judge alone at his trial by general court-martial was improperly executed in that it omitted to specify the name of the judge who was requested to try the case. As a consequence, the court-martial which was convened on May 22, 1970, to try him lacked jurisdiction to hear the petitioner’s case. United States v Brown, 21 USCMA 516, 45 CMR 290 (1972); United States v Grote, 21 USCMA 519, 45 CMR 293 (1972); United States v Rountree, 21 USCMA 62, 44 CMR 116 (1971); United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970).

In Belichesky v Bowman, 21 USCMA 146, 44 CMR 200 (1972), our decision in United States v Dean, supra, was held retroactively applicable to August 1, 1969, the effective date of the Military Justice Act of 1968 (Act of October 24, 1968, Public Law 90-632, 82 Stat 1335). It, as well as the holdings in United States *668v Brown and United States v Grote, both supra, are accordingly applicable to the accused’s case.

It is, therefore, by the Court, this 13th day of September 1972,

ORDERED:

That the Petition for Extraordinary Relief filed in the above-styled case be, and the same hereby is, granted. The decision of the United States Navy Court of Military Review is reversed and the findings and sentence of accused’s general court-martial are hereby set aside.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          561818
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2287365
<ALLOWANCES>                                     44120
<INVENTORY>                                     551920
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3505708
<PP&E>                                         6897178
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1831131
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                17193968
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2271723
<BONDS>                                         639446
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      53742005
<OTHER-SE>                                  (39459206)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  17193968
<SALES>                                        3818350
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7951584
<CGS>                                          2495347
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7291390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (25033)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              224490
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 460737
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             460737
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    460737
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
# C_2008245EN.01000101.xml

| 26.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 September 2008

(2008/C 245/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,47 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 155,91 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,46 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,792 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6829 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5944 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 137,29 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,271 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,414 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 240,75 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7085 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,3395 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6829 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,29 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8178 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7491 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5205 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,4253 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1372 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0895 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 691,24 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,9893 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,021 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,122 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 777,58 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0377 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,27 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,722 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,862 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7235 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,9172 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,47

JPY

Japanese yen

155,91

DKK

Danish krone

7,46

GBP

Pound sterling

0,792

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6829

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5944

ISK

Iceland króna

137,29

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,271

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,414

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

240,75

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7085

PLN

Polish zloty

3,3395

RON

Romanian leu

3,6829

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,29

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8178

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7491

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5205

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,4253

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1372

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0895

KRW

South Korean won

1 691,24

ZAR

South African rand

11,9893

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,021

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,122

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 777,58

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0377

PHP

Philippine peso

68,27

RUB

Russian rouble

36,722

THB

Thai baht

49,862

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7235

MXN

Mexican peso

15,9172

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
No. 46315.

#### Protests 24689-K, etc., of Armacost & Royston, Inc., et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It wras stipulated that the merchandise consists of peat moss of the same character as that passed upon in *Peat Import Corp.*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 181, C. D. 319). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1685 was therefore sustained.
852.54755
No. 55407.

#### Abraham & Straus, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 155285-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protest was dismissed.
# C_2008262EN.01000401.xml

| 15.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 October 2008

(2008/C 262/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3752 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,52 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4533 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78105 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,677 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5526 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 305 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4375 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,611 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 250 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,709 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,4705 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,765 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,455 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8905 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9066 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,565 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6753 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1744 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0072 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 628,92 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,2187 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,405 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,1407 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 366,94 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8056 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,85 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,75 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,832 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,8258 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3401 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3752

JPY

Japanese yen

141,52

DKK

Danish krone

7,4533

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78105

SEK

Swedish krona

9,677

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5526

ISK

Iceland króna

305

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4375

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,611

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

250

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,709

PLN

Polish zloty

3,4705

RON

Romanian leu

3,765

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,455

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8905

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9066

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,565

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6753

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1744

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0072

KRW

South Korean won

1 628,92

ZAR

South African rand

12,2187

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,405

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,1407

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 366,94

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8056

PHP

Philippine peso

64,85

RUB

Russian rouble

35,75

THB

Thai baht

46,832

BRL

Brazilian real

2,8258

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3401

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 109 

Commending the University of Oklahoma Sooners men’s gymnastics team 

for winning the National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Men’s 

Gymnastics Championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 14, 2005 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself and Mr. COBURN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the University of Oklahoma Sooners men’s 

gymnastics team for winning the National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Men’s Gymnastics Championship. 

Whereas on April 8, 2005, the University of Oklahoma Sooners won their sixth National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I Men’s Gymnastics Championship, 

at West Point, New York; 

Whereas the 2005 NCAA Championship is the Sooners’ third 

championship in the past 4 years; 

Whereas the championship title crowned a remarkable season 

for the Sooners in which the team achieved an impressive 

record of 21 wins and only 2 losses; 
2 

•SRES 109 ATS

Whereas the Sooners clinched a spectacular, nail-biting victory over the Ohio State Buckeyes, which was made possible by a heroic final performance on the vault by freshman Jonathan Horton; 

Whereas the Sooners’ winning score of 225.675 set a school 

record and dramatically surpassed second-place Ohio 

State’s score of 225.450; 

Whereas 6 members of the University of Oklahoma men’s 

gymnastics team, including Taqiy Abdullah-Simmons, 

Josh Gore, David Henderson, Jamie Henderson, Jonathan Horton, and Jacob Messina, also garnered a schoolrecord 13 All-America honors in the individual event 

finals; 

Whereas senior David Henderson’s 2005 NCAA title on the 

still rings gave the University of Oklahoma its 18th alltime individual national champion and capped off an exceptional 4 years; 

Whereas Head Coach Mark Williams was named the 2005 

NCAA Coach of the Year, making it the third time in his 

distinguished career that Head Coach Williams has received that honor; 

Whereas the tremendous success of the 2005 Sooners adds 

to the outstanding legacy of men’s gymnastics at the 

University of Oklahoma and is a reflection of the heart 

and dedication of the entire school, from the president to 

the athletic directors, coaches, athletes, managers, and 

staff members; and 

Whereas the teamwork, grit, and sportsmanship demonstrated by the University of Oklahoma Sooners men’s 

gymnastics team is a proud tribute to the university and 
3 

•SRES 109 ATS

the communities from which the team members hail: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the University of Oklahoma 

3 Sooners for their sixth National Collegiate Athletic 

4 Association Division I Men’s Gymnastics Champion5 ship; 

6 (2) recognizes all who have contributed their 

7 hard work and support to making the 2005 season 

8 a historic success; and 

9 (3) directs the Secretary of the Senate to trans10 mit a copy of this resolution to University of Okla11 homa President David L. Boren and Head Coach 

12 Mark Williams for appropriate display. 

Æ
Chicago‐Milwaukee

Amtrak Hiawatha Service

Draft Environmental Assessment

Appendix I

Section 4(f) Parks, Recreation, and Natural

Areas
   

           

       

             

           

             

               

             

             

       

             

           

             

               

           

             

   

   

           

           

                 

             

      

           

             

   

           

           

           

              

                 

             

           

   

   

             

                

              

Appendix I

Section 4(f) Parks, Recreation, and Natural Areas

Figure I‐1

Section 4(f) Parks, Recreation, and Natural Areas

Property Type Jurisdiction Relationship

Mozart Park City Park City of Chicago Adjacent

Ken Well Park City Park City of Chicago Adjacent

Kilbourn Park City Park City of Chicago Adjacent

Forest Glen Woods Forest Preserve Cook County Adjacent

Billy Caldwell Golf Course Private Adjacent

Indian Road Woods Forest Preserve Cook County Adjacent

Edgebrook Woods Forest Preserve Cook County Adjacent

St. Paul Woods Forest Preserve Cook County Adjacent

Harrer Park City Park City of Morton Grove Adjacent

Linne Woods Forest Preserve Cook County Adjacent

Diederich Park City Park City of Glenview Adjacent

Willowhill Golf Course Private Adjacent

Anetsberger Golf Course Private Adjacent

Somme Woods Forest Preserve Cook County Adjacent

Somme Prairie Nature Preserve Cook County Adjacent

Morton Grove Prairie Nature Preserve Morton Grove Park District Adjacent

Prairie Wolf Slough Forest Preserve Lake County Adjacent

Conway Farms Golf Course Private Adjacent

Middlefork Savannah Forest Preserve Lake County Partitions

Viking Park City Park City of Gurnee Adjacent

Midlane Golf Course Private Adjacent

Gurnee Woods Forest Preserve Lake County Adjacent

Wetlands Demonstration Project Forest Preserve Lake County Adjacent

Wadsworth Prairie Nature Preserve Lake County Partitions

Van Patton Woods Forest Preserve Lake County Adjacent

Prairie Springs Park City Park City of Pleasant Prairie Adjacent

Root River Parkway County Park Racine/Milwaukee County Partitions

MATC Oak Creek Campus Driving Range Private Adjacent

Holy Trinity Cemetery Private Adjacent

St. Adalberts Cemetery Private Adjacent

Root River Parkway County Park Milwaukee County Partitions

Oak Creek Parkway County Park Milwaukee County Adjacent

Baran Park County Park Milwaukee County Adjacent

Chicago‐Milwaukee Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor August 2016
 

Draft Environmental Assessment – Appendix I Appendix I‐2
Case: 2:12-cv-01140-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 04/23/13 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01140-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 04/23/13 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2016-03-31T10:38:16-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v DANNY G. THOMPSON, Fireman Recruit, U. S. Navy, Appellant

19 USCMA 484, 42 CMR 86

No. 22,865

June 5, 1970

*Commander E. M. Fulton, Jr.,*JAGC, USN, and *Captain Jeffery W, Maurer,*USMC, were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Charles J. Keever,*USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

Thompson has been convicted of two unauthorized absences beginning before 

August 1, 1969, the effective date of paragraph *75d,*Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Revised edition). Evidence of Article 15 disciplinary action for a six and one-half day unauthorized absence was inadmissible as to aggravate the sentence. United States v Johnson, 19 USCMA 464, 42 CMR 66 (1970). The presence of substantial other evidence in aggravation makes the effect of the above unauthorized absence minuscule. Reassessment of the sentence is not required.

This ease also raises a question regarding the military judge’s certification of seven prosecution exhibits. The issue, as worded, assumes that the certifications occurred before trial. This assumption appears to be without factual basis. Not only did the military judge attest to the correctness of seven prosecution exhibits but he made similar attestations as to at least ten defense exhibits. We therefore believe it obvious that his certifications on all of these exhibits — both prosecution and defense — occurred after trial, not before. There is no error. United States v Johnson, supra.

Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Court of Military Review.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

*485Ferguson, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Johnson, 19 USCMA 464, 42 CMR 66 (1970).