19024 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Office of the Secretary 

Submission for OMB Review: 

Comment Request 

April 11, 2007. 

The Department of Labor (DOL) has 

submitted the following public 

information collection request (ICR) to 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 

44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). A copy of this 

ICR, with applicable supporting 

documentation, may be obtained at 

http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ 

PRAMain, or contact Ira Mills on 202–

693–4122 (this is not a toll-free number) 

or e-Mail: Mills.Ira@dol.gov. 

Comments should be sent to the 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for U.S. 

Department of Labor/Employment and 

Training Administration (ETA), Office 

of Management and Budget, Room 

10235, Washington, DC 20503, 202–

395–7316 (this is not a toll free number), 

within 30 days from the date of this 

publication in the Federal Register. 

The OMB is particularly interested in 

comments which: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Agency: Employment and Training 

Administration. 

Type of Review: Revision of a 

currently approved collection. 

Title: Transmittal of Unemployment 

Insurance Materials. 

OMB Number: 1205–0222. 

Frequency: Annually. 

Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal 

Government. 

Type of Response: Reporting. 

Number of Respondents: 53. 

Annual Responses: 636. 

Average Response time: 1 minute. 

Total Annual Burden Hours: 11. 

Total Annualized Capital/Startup 

Costs: 0. 

Total Annual Costs (operating/ 

maintaining systems or purchasing 

services): 0. 

Description: Section 303(a)(6), SSA, 

requires, as a condition of receiving 

administrative grants, that state law 

contain provision for the ‘‘making of 

such reports, in such form and 

containing such information, as the 

Secretary of Labor may from time to 

time require, and compliance with such 

provisions as the Secretary of Labor may 

from time to time find necessary to 

ensure the correctness and verification 

of such reports.’’ Departmental 

regulations at 20 CFR 601.3 in part 

implement this requirement by 

requiring the submission of ‘‘all relevant 

state materials, such as statutes, 

executive and administrative orders, 

legal opinions, rules, regulations, 

interpretations, court opinions, etc. 

* * * ’’ Also, the regulations for the UC 

for Federal Civilian Employees (UCFE) 

program at 20 CFR 609.1(d)(1) and for 

the UC for ex-service members (UCX) 

program at 20 CFR 614.1(d)(1) require 

submission of certain documents to 

assure that states are properly 

administering these programs. The 

Trade Adjustment Assistance (which 

includes Trade Readjustment 

Allowances) program (TAA/TRA) 

regulations provide similar 

requirements at 20 CFR 617.52(c)(1). 

The MA 8–7 is the mechanism for 

implementing these submittal 

requirements, the purpose of which is to 

provide the Secretary with sufficient 

information to determine if (a) 

employers in a state qualify for tax 

credits under the Federal 

Unemployment Tax Act; (b) the state 

meets the requirements for obtaining 

administrative grants under Title III, 

SSA; and (c) the state is fulfilling it 

obligations under Federal UC programs. 

Ira L. Mills, 

Departmental Clearance Officer/Team 

Leader. 

[FR Doc. E7–7150 Filed 4–13–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–30–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–60,709] 

Caraustar Industries, York Carton 

Plant; York, PA; Amended Certification 

Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 

Worker Adjustment Assistance and 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and 

Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 

U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the 

Department of Labor issued a 

Certification of Eligibility to Apply for 

Worker Adjustment Assistance and 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance on February 14, 2007, 

applicable to workers of Caraustar 

Custom Packaging Group, Inc., Austell, 

Georgia. The notice was published in 

the Federal Register on February 27, 

2007 (72 FR 8794). 

At the request of the State agency, the 

Department reviewed the certification 

for workers of the subject firm. The 

workers are engaged in the production 

of folding cartons. 

New information shows that the 

correct name and location of the subject 

firm should read Caraustar Industries, 

York Carton Plant, York, Pennsylvania. 

Caraustar Custom Packaging Group, 

Inc., Austell, Georgia, the parent firm of 

Caraustar Industries, was inadvertently 

stated as the subject firm of this 

investigation in the original certification 

and is not the subject firm of this 

investigation. 

The investigation that was conducted 

was correctly conducted on behalf of the 

workers of Caraustar Industries, York 

Carton Plant, York, Pennsylvania. 

Accordingly, the Department is 

amending this certification to correct 

the subject firm name, city and State. 

The intent of the Department’s 

certification is to include all workers of 

Caraustar Industries, York Carton Plant 

who were adversely affected by 

customer imports. 

The amended notice applicable to 

TA–W–60,709 is hereby issued as 

follows: 

All workers of Caraustar Industries, York 

Carton Plant, York, Pennsylvania, who 

became totally or partially separated from 

employment on or after December 20, 2005 

through February 14, 2009, are eligible to 

apply for adjustment assistance under 

Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are 

also eligible to apply for alternative trade 

adjustment assistance under Section 246 of 

the Trade Act of 1974. 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Notices 19025 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of 

April 2007. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7–7101 Filed 4–13–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–61,204] 

Gildan Activewear Malone, Inc., 

Bombay, NY; Notice of Termination of 

Investigation 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade 

Act of 1974, as amended, an 

investigation was initiated on March 27, 

2007 in response to a worker petition 

filed a company official on behalf of 

workers at Gildan Activewear Malone, 

Inc., Bombay, New York. 

The petitioner has withdrawn the 

petition. Thus, this investigation is 

terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of 

April 2007. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7–7098 Filed 4–13–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–60,115] 

Modine Manufacturing, Blythewood, 

SC; Notice of Revised Determination 

on Reconsideration 

On November 16, 2006, the 

Department issued an Affirmative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration for the workers and 

former workers of Modine 

Manufacturing, Blythewood, South 

Carolina (the subject firm). The 

Department’s Notice of affirmative 

determination was published in the 

Federal Register on November 24, 2006 

(71 FR 67918). 

The worker-filed petition, dated 

September 19, 2006, stated that the 

subject firm produces automotive 

transmission oil coolers, that the subject 

firm will close in April 2007, and that 

subject firm production is shifting 

abroad (to Mexico). 

The denial of the workers’ eligibility 

to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) was 

based on the Department’s findings that 

there was no decline in sales or 

production in January through August 

2006 compared to the same period in 

2005, the subject firm did not import, 

and the subject firm did not shift 

production abroad during the relevant 

period. The determination was issued 

on October 12, 2006 and the Notice of 

determination was published in the 

Federal Register on October 25, 2006 

(71 FR 62490). 

Based on the July 20, 2006 WARN 

notice provided during the 

reconsideration (‘‘It is anticipated that 

the plant closing will commence on 

September 15, 2006 and will continue 

into 2007’’), the Department determines 

that, during the relevant period, there 

were significant sales, production, and 

employment declines at the subject 

firm. 

On reconsideration, the Department 

received information that revealed no 

increased import purchases of 

automotive transmission oil coolers or 

articles like or directly competitive with 

automotive transmission oil coolers by 

either the subject firm or the subject 

firm’s major declining customers. As 

such, the Department determines that 

increased imports did not contribute 

importantly to the subject workers’

separations. 

During the reconsideration 

investigation, the Department also 

confirmed with company officials that 

production shifted from the subject firm 

to an affiliated facility in Illinois. 

When it became apparent during the 

reconsideration investigation that the 

subject workers are not eligible to apply 

for TAA as primary workers, the 

Department conducted an investigation 

to determine whether the workers are 

eligible as secondary workers (workers 

of a company that supplied component 

parts to a customer that employed a 

group of workers certified for TAA). 

As the reconsideration investigation 

progressed, the Department was able to 

identify a subject firm customer that 

employed a group of workers who 

received a TAA certification and 

determined that the component parts 

supplied by the subject firm are related 

to the article that was the basis for the 

certification. Further, the new 

information revealed that the TAAcertified customer constituted over 20% 

of subject firm sales prior to the plant 

closure in September 2006. 

In accordance with Section 246 the 

Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 

amended, the Department herein 

presents the results of its investigation 

regarding certification of eligibility to 

apply for ATAA. The Department has 

determined in this case that the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 246 

have been met. 

A significant number of workers at the 

firm are age 50 or over and possess 

skills that are not easily transferable. 

Competitive conditions within the 

industry are adverse. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

information obtained in the 

reconsideration investigation, I 

determine that workers of Modine 

Manufacturing, Blythewood, South 

Carolina qualify as adversely affected 

secondary workers under Section 222 of 

the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. In 

accordance with the provisions of the 

Act, I make the following certification: 

‘‘All workers of Modine Manufacturing, 

Blythewood, South Carolina, who became 

totally or partially separated from 

employment on or after September 19, 2005 

through two years from the date of this 

certification, are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Section 223 of 

the Trade Act of 1974, and are eligible to 

apply for alternative trade adjustment 

assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act 

of 1974.’’

Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of 

April 2007. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7–7099 Filed 4–13–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–61,134] 

National Textiles (Sara Lee), WinstonSalem, NC; Notice of Termination of 

Investigation 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade 

Act of 1974, as amended, an 

investigation was initiated on March 19, 

2007, in response to a petition filed by 

on behalf of workers of National 

Textiles, Sara Lee, Winston-Salem, 

North Carolina. 

The petitioning group of workers is 

covered by an amended certification for 

workers of Hanes Brands Inc., formerly 

National Textiles, formerly Sara Lee 

Branded Apparel, Division Office, 

Winston-Salem, North Carolina (TA–W–

57,802), which expires on September 

28, 2007. Consequently, further 

investigation in this case would serve 

no purpose, and the investigation has 

been terminated. 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES