alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of TransTechnology Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 29, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date:  November 12, 2002                          /s/Michael J. Berthelot
       --------------------------------         --------------------------------
                                                Michael J. Berthelot,
                                                Chief Executive Officer


Date:  November 12, 2002                         /s/Joseph F. Spanier
       --------------------------------         --------------------------------
                                                Joseph F. Spanier,
                                                Chief Financial Officer
# Official Journal L 172/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 172 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 583 July 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 172

English edition

Legislation

Volume 583 July 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 83 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the emission of pollutants according to engine fuel requirements [2015/1038] | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 83 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the emission of pollutants according to engine fuel requirements [2015/1038]

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00087-CR

James M. HANNINGTON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1987CR2073

Honorable Sharon MacRae, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 13, 2013

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION 

In 1988, James M. Hannington pleaded guilty to felony credit card abuse pursuant to a 

plea bargain, and the court sentenced him to six years confinement, suspended imposition of the 

sentence and placed Hannington on probation for a period of six years. On June 10, 1991, the 

trial court revoked Hannington’s probation and imposed a six year prison term. The judgment 

ordered the term to run consecutive to the prison term imposed in another cause. On January 28, 

2013, Hannington filed a notice of appeal, challenging the 1991 sentence.
04-13-00087-CR

- 2 -

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Rodarte 

v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993). When a defendant appeals a conviction and 

sentence, the notice of appeal is timely if filed within thirty days after the day sentence is 

imposed or suspended in open court, or within ninety days after sentencing if the defendant 

timely files a motion for new trial. Id. at 109–10; Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1996).

Because the notice of appeal in this case was not timely filed, we lack jurisdiction to 

entertain the appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see Slaton v. 

State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (holding that if appeal is not timely 

perfected, court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address merits of appeal, and court may 

take no action other than to dismiss appeal; court may not suspend rules to alter time for 

perfecting appeal).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
#### B. Forman Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7376.

Invoices dated London, England, February 20, 1946, etc.

Certified February 21, 1946, etc.

Entered at Rochester, N. Y., April 5, 1946, etc.

Entry No. 573, etc.

(Decided September 10, 1947)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(William J. Vitale,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the appraised values of the merchandise involved, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, are equal to the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise was no higher.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, and following *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334, the record in which case was incorporated as part of the record herein, I find that export value,as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances made by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
- FPL_1551ocr-1
- FPL_1551ocr-2
- FPL_1551ocr-3
- FPL_1551ocr-4
- FPL_1551ocr-5
- FPL_1551ocr-6
- FPL_1551ocr-7
- FPL_1551ocr-8
- FPL_1551ocr-9
- FPL_1551ocr-10
- FPL_1551ocr-11
- FPL_1551ocr-12
- FPL_1551ocr-13
- FPL_1551ocr-14
- FPL_1551ocr-15
- FPL_1551ocr-16
- FPL_1551ocr-17
- FPL_1551ocr-18
- FPL_1551ocr-19
- FPL_1551ocr-20
- FPL_1551ocr-21
- FPL_1551ocr-22
- FPL_1551ocr-23
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Chief Executive Officer Certification**

 

I, William C. Enloe, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Trinity Capital Corporation;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a)             Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)            Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)             Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting, and;

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)             All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)            Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  August 6, 2004 | /s/  WILLIAM C. ENLOE                  |   |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                       | William  C. Enloe                      |
|                       | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Southern District of Ohio

Tammeria Hansgen, )

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-23

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

’ the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of %, along with costs.

’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

other: This case is hereby DISMISSED for want of prosecution. 

 

 .

This action was (check one):

’ tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

’ tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: Sep 25, 2012 CLERK OF COURT

s/Denise Shane, Deputy Clerk

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-00023-JLG-MRA Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA Y 9, 2013

NO. 03

- 10

- 00711

- CV

Rita Murdock, Appellant

v.

Trisun Healthcare, LLC d/b/a Park Place Health Center, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFO RE JUSTICES PURYEAR, RO SE AND GOODWIN
REVERSED AND REMANDED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

DISSENTING OPINION B Y JUSTICE ROSE

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was error in the trial court’s

judgment: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is FURTHER ordered that the appellee pay all cos ts relating to this appeal, both in this Court

and the court below; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 35.1














SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT OF TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION (“THE SERVICER”)








I, Wei Shi, certify that:





(a)   A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable Sale and Servicing Agreement during the year ended December 31, 2012 has been made under my supervision.




(b)   To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.








March 21, 2013








By:  /S/ WEI SHI





Wei Shi


Vice President - Treasury, Finance & Analytics


Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as Servicer of the


Toyota Auto Receivables 2010-C Owner Trust


- 22 -
Dismiss and Opinion Filed July 18, 2014 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-12-01655-CV

LULLY'S INC. D/B/A/ THE RIGHT ONE, Appellant

V.

MELANIE MATTOON, DAVID BOGNER, PENNI SKLAR, AND NAOMI KIARIE, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Appellees

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-03363



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright a nd Justices Lang-Miers and Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright

The parties move to DISMISS this appeal, stating the appeal and underlying trial court

litigation have been settl ed. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

121655F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

LULLY'S INC. D/B/A/ THE RIGHT ONE, Appellant

No. 05-12-01655-CV V.

MELANIE MATTOON, DAVID BOGNER, PENNI SKLAR, AND NAOMI KIARIE, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Appellees On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-03363. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Brown participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Subject to any agreement among the parties, we ORDER that appellees Melanie Mattoon, David Bogner, Penni Sklar, and Naomi Kiar ie, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, recover their costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Lully’s Inc. d/b/a The Right One.

Judgment entered July 18, 2014
### AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No . FAA - 2015 - 0674 Directorate ID : 2014 - SW - 019 - AD Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (Previously Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH) Model EC135 P1, P2, P2+, T1, T2, and T2+; and Model MBB - BK 117 C - 2 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 175 Model EC135 and 112 Model MBB - BK 117 C - 2 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to prevent the affected control lever from shifting, contact ing the helicopter structure, and reducing control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $312 (modification) for Model EC135 helicopters $396 (modification) for Model MBB - BK 117 C - 2 helicopters Labor per Helicopter ( 32 work-hour x $ 8 5 /workhour for the modification) (6.5 work- hour x $85/workhour for the inspection on Model EC135 helicopters ) (1 work-hour x $85/workhour for the inspection on Model MBB - BK 117 C - 2 helicopters ) $ 2,720 $ 553 per inspection cycle $85 per inspection cycle O ther (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $3,032 (modification) for Model EC135 helicopters $3,116 (modification) for Model MBB - BK 117 C - 2 helicopters $553 (inspection) for Model EC135 helicopters per inspection cycle $85 (inspection) for Model MBB - BK 117 C - 2 helicopters Total US Fleet Cost $530,600 (modification) for Model EC135 helicopters $348,992 (modification) for Model MBB - BK 117 C - 2 helicopters $96,775 (inspection) for Model EC135 helicopters per inspection cycle $9,520 (inspection) for Model MBB - B K 117 C - 2 helicopters2



### Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Wi ll the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Matt Fuller
West Coast Region Home

About Us

What We Do

Aquaculture

Fish Passage

Habitat

Protected Species

Fisheries

Hatcheries

Resources

Permits & Authorizations

Publications

Education & Outreach

Maps & Data

Recent Stories

Newsroom

NOAA Affiliates

West Coast Region Home » Green Sturgeon

Green sturgeon reach maturity around 15 years of age and can live to be 70 years old. Unlike sa

their long lives, returning to their natal rivers every 3-5 years. By comparing the DNA and movem

identified two genetically distinct population segments (DPS) of green sturgeon. Although these f

makeup is very different. This distinction allows NOAA Fisheries and other agencies to manage p

preserve diversity.

Fish that spawn in the Klamath River in Northern California and the Rogue River in Oregon belon

listed by NOAA Fisheries as a Species of Concern. Fish that spawn in the Sacramento River in C

southern DPS (sDPS). Record also show that historically, the sDPS spawned in Eel River (Califo

found to utilize these areas today.

During spawning runs, adult sDPS fish enter San Francisco Bay between mid-February and ear

Sacramento River. Spawning occurs in cool sections of the upper Sacramento River with deep, t

fall, these post spawn adults move back down the river and re-enter the ocean. After hatching, la

toward the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and estuary. After rearing in the delta and estuary for 

As adults, both sDPS and nDPS green sturgeon migrate seasonally along the West Coast, congr

Washington, Oregon, and California during the summer and fall months. During winter and spring

Vancouver Island B.C. Canada. 

For more information, contact NOAA Fisheries Green Sturgeon Recovery Coordinator, David Wo

or 707.575.6088.

NOAA HOME WEATHER OCEANS FISHERIES CHARTING SATELLITES CLIMATE RESEARCH COASTS CAREERS

Contact the West Coast

Region

Learn more about ESA

Section 7 consultations

Learn more about the Pacific

Coastal Salmon Recovery

Fund

Log into my IFQ account

Find a biological opinion

Report a stranded or

entangled marine mammal

Report a violation

Find grant opportunities

How do I?

Life History :: NOAA Fisheries West Coast Region http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/protected_species/green_sturge...

1 of 2 4/21/2016 11:22 AM
West Coast Region

Comment on Proposed Rules

Grants

Jobs

Feedback

Locate NOAA Staff

About Us

NOAA Fisheries Service

Fisheries Home

Privacy Policy

Information Quality

Disclaimer

About Us

Life History :: NOAA Fisheries West Coast Region http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/protected_species/green_sturge...

2 of 2 4/21/2016 11:22 AM
# C_2009014EN.01000302.xml

| 21.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5226 — Cinven/PGHL)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 14/06)

On 22 July 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5226. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5226. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       5,070,241
<SECURITIES>                                 5,393,256
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,042,224
<ALLOWANCES>                                   183,107
<INVENTORY>                                  4,848,654
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,791,124
<PP&E>                                      14,200,624
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,612,702
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,559,319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,143,695
<BONDS>                                      1,922,667
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,205
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,451,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,559,319
<SALES>                                     26,248,760
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,248,760
<CGS>                                       13,694,651
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,694,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,106,005
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,172
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,101,160
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,625,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,475,960
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,475,960
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES

 

Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. had international subsidiaries shown below as of March 31, 2022. Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.is not a subsidiary of any other entity.

 

|                                          |        |                               |
|------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| Subsidiary                               |   | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|                                     |   |
| Amylyx Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc.       |   | Canada                        |
|                                     |   |                          |
| Amylyx Pharmaceuticals EMEA B.V.         |   | Netherlands                   |
|                                     |   |
| Amylyx Pharmaceuticals Distribution Ltd. |   | Ireland                       |
|                                     |   |                          |
| Amylyx Pharmaceuticals Germany GmbH      |   | Germany                       |

 

 

----